Page last updated: 2024-11-13

ixazomib

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

ixazomib: a proteasome inhibitor with antineoplastic activity; MLN2238 is the biologically active form of MLN9708; structure in first source [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

ixazomib : A glycine derivative that is the amide obtained by formal condensation of the carboxy group of N-(2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)glycine with the amino group of [(1R)-1-amino-3-methylbutyl]boronic acid. The active metabolite of ixazomib citrate, it is used in combination therapy for treatment of multiple myeloma. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

FloraRankFlora DefinitionFamilyFamily Definition
GlycinegenusA non-essential amino acid. It is found primarily in gelatin and silk fibroin and used therapeutically as a nutrient. It is also a fast inhibitory neurotransmitter.[MeSH]FabaceaeThe large family of plants characterized by pods. Some are edible and some cause LATHYRISM or FAVISM and other forms of poisoning. Other species yield useful materials like gums from ACACIA and various LECTINS like PHYTOHEMAGGLUTININS from PHASEOLUS. Many of them harbor NITROGEN FIXATION bacteria on their roots. Many but not all species of beans belong to this family.[MeSH]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID25183872
CHEMBL ID2141296
CHEBI ID90942
SCHEMBL ID3742758
MeSH IDM000602996

Synonyms (65)

Synonym
NCGC00249611-01
D10130
ixazomib (usan)
mln 2238
mln-2238
MLN2238 ,
boronic acid, b-((1r)-1-((2-((2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)amino)acetyl)amino)-3-methylbutyl)-
ixazomib [usan:inn]
ixazomib [inn]
ixazomib
unii-71050168a2
71050168a2 ,
AKOS015995120
BCP9000953
bdbm50398609
CHEMBL2141296 ,
mln-9708 free base
1072833-77-2
NCGC00249611-03
ixazomib [usan]
((1r)-1-((2,5-dichlorobenzamido)acetamido)-3-methylbutyl)boronic acid
ixazomib [who-dd]
ixazomib [mi]
S2180
(r)-1-(2-(2,5-dichlorobenzamido)acetamido)-3-methylbutylboronic acid
BRD-K78659596-001-01-3
CS-1657
HY-10453
SCHEMBL3742758
CHEBI:90942 ,
n-[(1r)-1-borono-3-methylbutyl]-n(2)-(2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)glycinamide
(r)-(1-(2-(2,5-dichlorobenzamido)acetamido)-3-methylbutyl)boronic acid
[(1r)-1-[[2-[(2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)amino]acetyl]amino]-3-methyl-butyl]boronic acid
ixozamib
[(1r)-1-[[2-[(2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)amino]acetyl]amino]-3-methylbutyl]boronic acid
gtpl8450
AC-28456
DB09570
J-001749
EX-A547
mfcd18251438
[(1r)-1-{2-[(2,5-dichlorophenyl)formamido]acetamido}-3-methylbutyl]boronic acid
ixazomib(mln2238)
SW219743-1
mln2238(ixazomib)
BCP02410
ixazomib impurity
BCP24078
ixazomib (mln2238)
1072833-77-2 (free)
ixazomib (mln-2238)
Q20948663
AMY19380
CCG-264938
NCGC00249611-04
(r)-1-(2-(2,5-dichlorobenzamido)acetamido)-3-methylbutylboronic acid;ixazomib
A25328
AS-55976
nsc766907
nsc-766907
DTXSID701025662
EN300-7360341
n-((1r)-1-borono-3-methylbutyl)-n(2)-(2,5-dichlorobenzoyl)glycinamide
l01xx50
ixazomibum

Research Excerpts

Overview

Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) The drug is generally well tolerated; but the bone effect remains unknown.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma with adverse effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rashes, and thrombocytopenia reported in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance, resulting in treatment discontinuation. "( Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2022
)
2.46
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). "( Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients.
Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022
)
2.41
"Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug. "( An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022
)
2.46
"Ixazomib is a new-generation, oral PI that is generally well tolerated; however, its bone effect remains unknown."( Increased Bone Volume by Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma: 3-Month Results from an Open Label Phase 2 Study.
Abildgaard, N; Andersen, CW; Asmussen, JT; Diaz-delCastillo, M; Gundesen, MT; Kristensen, IB; Levin Andersen, T; Lund, T; Møller, HEH; Nielsen, AL; Nyvold, CG; Vinholt, PJ, 2023
)
1.93
"Ixazomib is a second-generation oral proteasome inhibitor."( Ixazomib - lenalidomide - dexamethason in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients - case reports.
Štork, M, 2023
)
3.07
"Ixazomib is a feasible and effective maintenance option for prolonging PFS across this heterogeneous patient population."( Ixazomib Versus Placebo as Postinduction Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: An Analysis by Age and Frailty Status of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study.
Benjamin, R; Bringhen, S; C de Farias, DL; Cain, LE; Cherepanov, D; Dimopoulos, MA; Grosicki, S; Labotka, RJ; Manne, S; Min, CK; Pour, L; Rajkumar, SV; Vorog, A; Wang, B, 2023
)
3.8
"Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). "( Real-world effectiveness of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the REMIX study.
Barrak, J; Benboubker, L; Calmettes, C; Charvet-Rumpler, A; Chouaid, C; Clement-Filliatre, L; Honeyman, F; Hulin, C; Karlin, L; Laribi, K; Leleu, X; Macro, M; Maloisel, F; Richez, V; Stoppa, AM; Vincent, L; Zerazhi, H, 2023
)
2.65
"Ixazomib is an efficacious and tolerable option for post-ASCT maintenance."( Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma.
Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020
)
1.51
"Ixazomib is an oral, second-generation, proteasome inhibitor that has been shown in preclinical models to prevent GVHD."( Ixazomib for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Abedin, S; Chhabra, S; D'Souza, A; Dhakal, B; Douglas Rizzo, J; Drobyski, WR; Fenske, TS; Hamadani, M; Hari, PN; Horowitz, MM; Jerkins, JH; Pasquini, MC; Runaas, L; Saber, W; Shah, NN; Shaw, BE; Tang, X; Thompson, R; Visotcky, A; Zhang, MJ; Zhu, F, 2020
)
2.72
"Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib."( The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020
)
1.49
"Ixazomib is a selective, effective, and reversible inhibitor of 20S proteasome and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Ixazomib inhibits myeloma cell proliferation by targeting UBE2K.
Chen, X; Chen, Y; Dong, Z; Huang, J; Ma, L; Su, J; Tian, L; Wang, Q; Xiao, P, 2021
)
3.51
"Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible option for certain patients who can benefit from an all-oral triplet combination."( Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Bahlis, NJ; Benboubker, L; Facon, T; Karlin, L; Kumar, SK; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Offner, F; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Rifkin, RM; Rigaudeau, S; Rodon, P; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Twumasi-Ankrah, P; Venner, CP; Voog, E; White, DJ; Yoon, SS; Yung, G; Zhang, X, 2021
)
1.86
"Ixazomib (IXA) is an orally available proteasome inhibitor, with an improved safety profile compared to Bortezomib (BTZ)."( Pre-Clinical Evaluation of the Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib against Bortezomib-Resistant Leukemia Cells and Primary Acute Leukemia Cells.
Cloos, J; Jansen, G; Kaspers, GJL; Kwidama, ZJ; Roeten, MSF; Segerink, WH; Ter Huizen, G; van Meerloo, J; Zweegman, S, 2021
)
1.59
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor with a wide safety profile that has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties, inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and anti-tumor activity."( Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib for Switch-Maintenance Prophylaxis of Recurrent or Late Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease after Day 100 in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Cho, C; Dahi, P; Devlin, SM; Flynn, L; Giralt, S; Lee, J; Murray, F; Perales, MA; Ponce, DM; Rodriguez, N; Sauter, C; Soto, C, 2021
)
1.64
"Ixazomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor that has been approved in the combination treatment of multiple myeloma and is currently under clinical investigation for the management of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. "( Ixazomib-induced cutaneous necrotizing vasculitis.
Alloo, A; Castillo, JJ; Granter, SR; Jadeja, SM; Khosravi, H; LeBoeuf, NR; Richardson, PG, 2018
)
3.37
"Ixazomib is a first-in-class oral proteasome inhibitor to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Acute Pancreatitis Associated with Ixazomib in a Multiple Myeloma Patient.
Lee, HC; Orlowski, RZ; Steiner, RE,
)
1.13
"Ixazomib is a boron-containing selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor that demonstrated antimyeloma activity with excellent safety profile."( Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma.
Moreau, P; Touzeau, C, 2018
)
2.64
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor used in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA-LEN-DEX) and licensed for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. "( Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Armoiry, X; Clarke, A; Connock, M; Cummins, E; Melendez-Torres, GJ; Royle, P; Tsertsvadze, A, 2018
)
3.37
"Ixazomib is a selective, potent, and reversible inhibitor of the 20S proteasome, and preferentially binds to and inhibits the β5 chymotrypsin-like proteolytic site."( Clinical Pharmacology of Ixazomib: The First Oral Proteasome Inhibitor.
Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Labotka, R; Venkatakrishnan, K; Xia, C, 2019
)
1.54
"Ixazomib is a selective and reversible inhibitor of the proteasome, which has been mainly investigated in the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).
Balic, M; Bartsch, R; Burgstaller, S; Egle, D; Fuchs, D; Gampenrieder, SP; Greil, R; Melchardt, T; Mlineritsch, B; Petru, E; Petzer, A; Rinnerthaler, G; Rossmann, D; Rumpold, H; Singer, CF; Ulmer, H, 2018
)
2.64
"Ixazomib is a new, orally administered, reversible proteasome inhibitor which is under investigation for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). "( Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders.
Rydygier, D; Smolewski, P, 2019
)
3.4
"Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor."( Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014
)
1.35
"Ixazomib is an investigational proteasome inhibitor that has shown preclinical activity in lymphoma models. "( Phase 1 dose-escalation study of IV ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.
Assouline, SE; Chang, J; Cheson, BD; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hamburg, S; Hui, AM; Martin, P; Reyes, R; Rifkin, R; Shou, Y; Yu, J, 2014
)
2.12
"Ixazomib is an investigational, oral, proteasome inhibitor with promising anti-myeloma effects and low rates of peripheral neuropathy."( Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014
)
1.42
"Ixazomib is an investigational proteasome inhibitor with demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models of multiple myeloma (MM), lymphoma, and solid tumors. "( Phase 1 study of ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in advanced non-hematologic malignancies.
Berg, D; Berger, AJ; Di Bacco, A; Gao, F; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Infante, JR; Kalebic, T; Kauh, JS; Lin, J; Liu, G; Siu, LL; Smith, DC; Sullivan, D; Thompson, JA; Tirrell, S; Vlahovic, G, 2015
)
2.2
"Ixazomib is an investigational, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor. "( The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2015
)
2.13
"Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs."( Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Azab, AK; Ghazarian, RN; Kusdono, HD; Luderer, MJ; Muz, B; Ou, M, 2016
)
1.52
"Ixazomib (Ninlaro(®)) is an orally bioavailable, reversible proteasome inhibitor developed by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. "( Ixazomib: First Global Approval.
Shirley, M, 2016
)
3.32
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor that is currently being studied for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Bahlis, NJ; Baker, BW; Berg, DT; Buadi, FK; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Ganly, P; Garderet, L; Gimsing, P; Grzasko, N; Hansson, M; Hui, AM; Jackson, SR; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Lin, J; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Palumbo, A; Pour, L; Richardson, PG; Sandhu, I; Simpson, DR; Stoppa, AM; Touzeau, C; van de Velde, H, 2016
)
2.39
"Ixazomib is an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor with a rapid proteasome dissociation rate."( Ixazomib suppresses human dendritic cell and modulates murine graft-versus-host disease in a schedule-dependent fashion.
Abdel-Mageed, S; Al-Homsi, AS; Cole, K; Feng, Y; Goodyke, A; McLane, M; Muilenburg, M, 2017
)
2.62

Effects

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ixazomib has been approved in several countries as single-agent maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, in both posttransplant and transplant-ineligible settings, based on two phase III studies. "( Dose Titration of Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Exposure-Response Analysis of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study.
Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK, 2023
)
2.69

Treatment

Ixazomib treatment resulted in significant metabolic regulation. Some of these changes were specific to KRAS WT tumors. Treatment did not adversely affect patient-reported quality-of-life scores across age and frailty status subgroups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In ixazomib-treated TCL and HL cells, transient inhibition followed by full recovery of proteasomal activity observed was accompanied by induction of proteasomal gene expression with NFE2L2 (also termed NRF2) as a prominent upstream regulator."( Combinatorial ixazomib and belinostat therapy induces NFE2L2-dependent apoptosis in Hodgkin and T-cell lymphoma.
Beheshti, A; David, KA; Evens, AM; McDonald, JT; Passero, FC; Ravi, D, 2020
)
1.43
"Ixazomib treatment resulted in significant metabolic regulation, and some of these changes were specific to KRAS WT tumors."( KRAS Genotype Correlates with Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Activity in Preclinical In Vivo Models of Colon and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Potential Role of Tumor Metabolism.
Amidon, B; Bannerman, B; Berger, AJ; Bernard, H; Chattopadhyay, N; Donelan, J; Galvin, K; Garnsey, J; Hales, P; Hather, G; Jordan, K; Koenig, E; Maldonado Lopez, A; Manfredi, M; Rhodes, N; Stringer, B; Tirrell, S; Xia, C; Yang, Y, 2015
)
1.39
"Treatment with ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has demonstrated better efficacy and safety profile without increasing the toxicity."( The MODIFY Study Protocol: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Prospective Pragmatic Study of Ixazomib-Based Triple-Drug Therapy in Chinese Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Chen, W; Li, L; Liu, A, 2023
)
1.47
"Treatment with ixazomib versus placebo did not adversely affect patient-reported quality-of-life scores across age and frailty status subgroups."( Ixazomib Versus Placebo as Postinduction Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: An Analysis by Age and Frailty Status of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study.
Benjamin, R; Bringhen, S; C de Farias, DL; Cain, LE; Cherepanov, D; Dimopoulos, MA; Grosicki, S; Labotka, RJ; Manne, S; Min, CK; Pour, L; Rajkumar, SV; Vorog, A; Wang, B, 2023
)
2.69
"Treatment with ixazomib had no toxic effect on the mdx mouse."( Ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, exhibits potential effect in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice.
Bertassoli, BM; Carvalho, AAS; Feder, D; Fonseca, FLA; Hermes, TA; Micheletto, MLJ; Perez, MM; Petri, G, 2021
)
2.4

Toxicity

Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma. Adverse effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rashes and thrombocytopenia reported in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance. Four dose-limiting toxic events were noted in phase 1.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Four dose-limiting toxic events were noted in phase 1: one at a dose of ixazomib of 2·97 mg/m(2) and three at 3·95 mg/m(2)."( Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014
)
0.93
" Twenty-one (49%) patients had at least one drug-related grade ≥3 adverse event (AE); the most common were neutropenia (19%), diarrhea (14%), and thrombocytopenia (12%)."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study.
Chim, CS; Chng, WJ; Esseltine, DL; Goh, YT; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hui, AM; Kim, K; Lee, JH; Min, CK; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wong, RS; Yang, H, 2015
)
0.7
" Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between ixazomib plasma exposure (area under the curve/day; derived from individual apparent clearance values from a published population pharmacokinetic analysis) and safety/efficacy outcomes (hematologic [grade ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2] or non-hematologic [grade ≥ 2 vs ≤ 1] adverse events [AEs], and clinical benefit [≥stable disease vs progressive disease]) using phase 1 data in relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820; N = 44)."( Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study.
Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016
)
0.92
" PK and adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a single 3 mg dose of ixazomib."( A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis.
Badros, A; Berdeja, J; Chari, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Hui, AM; Kukreti, V; Lipe, B; Qian, M; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, X, 2016
)
0.91
" Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects."( Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma.
Lonial, S; Panjic, EH; Schlafer, D; Shah, KS, 2017
)
0.46
" We focused on adverse events associated with such agents and described how they should be managed."( Management of adverse events induced by next-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma.
Boccadoro, M; Bonello, F; Larocca, A; Salvini, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety data from TOURMALINE-MM1 are reviewed and guidance for managing clinically relevant adverse events associated with IRd is provided."( Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Avivi, I; Berg, D; Einsele, H; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hájek, R; Hari, P; Kumar, S; Liberati, AM; Lin, J; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Masszi, T; Mateos, MV; Minnema, MC; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Romeril, K; Shustik, C; Spencer, A, 2017
)
0.71
" The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in IRd and placebo-Rd groups."( [Safety and management of adverse events of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone therapy in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma].
Aotsuka, N; Berg, D; Handa, H; Iida, S; Ishida, T; Izumi, T; Kase, Y; Komeno, T; Soeda, J; Sunami, K,
)
0.39
" The adverse events were usually mild, none leading to permanent drug interruptions."( Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program.
Alizadeh, H; Bátai, Á; Deák, B; Demeter, J; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Pető, M; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2019
)
0.78
" Fourteen patients (9%) discontinued IRd due to adverse events/toxicity in the absence of disease progression."( Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Aitchison, R; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jenner, MW; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Kothari, J; Kotsopoulou, M; Maouche, N; Minarik, J; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Ramasamy, K; Terpos, E; Vallance, GD; Zomas, A, 2020
)
0.83
" We report additional safety data from TOURMALINE-MM3 to inform adverse event (AE) management recommendations."( Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma.
Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020
)
0.79
"The incidence of grade 3 or more haematological and grade 2 or more non-haematological adverse events was lower in the dose-escalation group than in the standard-dose group, and only that of diarrhoea was significantly lower."( Safety and Effectiveness of Ixazomib Dose-escalating Strategy in Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Boku, S; Higai, K; Kagoo, T; Niijima, D; Ogawa, C; Ohashi, Y; Tani, K; Ueno, H; Yachi, Y; Yano, T; Yatabe, M; Yokoyama, A,
)
0.43
"A dose-escalation strategy to optimise ixazomib dosing may reduce treatment interruption due to adverse events without compromising its antitumor activity."( Safety and Effectiveness of Ixazomib Dose-escalating Strategy in Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Boku, S; Higai, K; Kagoo, T; Niijima, D; Ogawa, C; Ohashi, Y; Tani, K; Ueno, H; Yachi, Y; Yano, T; Yatabe, M; Yokoyama, A,
)
0.69
" In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures."( Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study.
Bao, L; Chen, B; Ding, K; Fu, C; Hua, L; Huang, Y; Li, B; Li, J; Liu, P; Luo, J; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, W; Wu, G; Xia, Z; Xu, T; Yang, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhou, X, 2020
)
2.26
"Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention."( Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, Z; Li, R; Ling, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhong, J, 2022
)
2.16
" The patient treatment course, including adverse events (AEs), was reported."( Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance.
Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022
)
1.06
" In terms of adverse reactions, our analysis revealed higher incidences of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 7."( Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
Chen, H; Shao, C; Sun, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, C, 2021
)
0.93
" The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, lung infections, diarrhea, and maculopapular rash."( Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma.
Bashir, Q; Feng, L; Huo, XJ; Lee, HC; Manasanch, EM; Morphey, A; Olsem, J; Orlowski, RZ; Patel, KK; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Weber, DM, 2022
)
0.96
"The addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance demonstrated a better than expected PFS compared with historical data using lenalidomide alone and was safe and tolerable."( Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma.
Bashir, Q; Feng, L; Huo, XJ; Lee, HC; Manasanch, EM; Morphey, A; Olsem, J; Orlowski, RZ; Patel, KK; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Weber, DM, 2022
)
1.31
"Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma with adverse effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rashes, and thrombocytopenia reported in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance, resulting in treatment discontinuation."( Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2022
)
2.46
"Herein, we aimed to determine the frequency and risk of AEs associated with ixazomib in Japanese patients using the Japanese Adverse Event Reporting Database (JADER)."( Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2022
)
1.25
" It does not have long-term cumulative toxicities, and the most adverse events are mild and manageable."( An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022
)
1.02
" Non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were more common than hematologic AEs."( Real-world toxicity and effectiveness of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in Korean patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.
Jo, JC; Kim, HR; Kim, K; Kim, SH; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, JY; Min, CK; Moon, JH; Shin, HJ, 2023
)
1.18
" Treatment-naïve patients with iNHL needing therapy received oral ixazomib 4 mg weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events."( Efficacy, safety, and molecular response predictors of oral ixazomib and short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL.
Coffey, DG; Cowan, AJ; Fromm, JR; Gooley, TA; Gopal, AK; Graf, SA; Greninger, AL; Libby, EN; Lynch, RC; Rasmussen, H; Shadman, M; Smith, SD; Ujjani, CS; Warren, EH, 2023
)
1.39
" The risk of cardiac adverse events (CAEs) with PIs has been documented with bortezomib and carfilzomib; however, only a few studies have been reported on ixazomib."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
1.11
"This study aimed to determine the safety signals of adverse events related to CAEs, the effect of concomitant medications, the time to the occurrence of CAEs, and the incidence of fatal clinical outcomes after the occurrence of CAEs for three PIs using the US Pharmacovigilance database."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
0.91
"We examined 1,567,240 cases of 231 drugs registered as anticancer drugs in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 1997 to March 2021."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
0.91
" However, no adverse event CAE signals were observed with ixazomib treatment."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
1.15
" Patients' treatment responses, overall response rate, progression-free survival rate, and adverse events were recorded."( Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter experience in Turkey.
Albayrak, M; Altuntas, F; Bakırtaş, M; Başcı, S; Basturk, A; Çakar, MK; Dal, MS; Dogu, MH; Ekinci, O; Eser, B; Giden, AO; Gulturk, E; Hacıbekiroglu, T; Kalpakci, Y; Korkmaz, S; Miskioglu, M; Ozatli, D; Serin, I; Ulas, T; Yiğenoğlu, TN, 2023
)
1.16
" Frequent (≥10% incidence) grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil and platelet counts (n=7 [16%] each)."( Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Following Injectable PI-Based Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Abe, Y; Chou, T; Handa, H; Ito, S; Mori, I; Sasaki, M; Shinozaki, T; Suzuki, K; Takezako, N; Yoshida, T, 2023
)
1.22

Pharmacokinetics

This population pharmacokinetic analysis of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib assessed the feasibility of switching from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing. The clinical drug-drug interaction study results were reconciled well by a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model that incorporated a minor contribution of CYP3A.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"This population pharmacokinetic analysis of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib assessed the feasibility of switching from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, and the impact of baseline covariates on ixazomib pharmacokinetics."( Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015
)
0.85
" This study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of ixazomib, administered with lenalidomide-dexamethasone, in East Asian patients with relapsed/refractory MM."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study.
Chim, CS; Chng, WJ; Esseltine, DL; Goh, YT; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hui, AM; Kim, K; Lee, JH; Min, CK; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wong, RS; Yang, H, 2015
)
0.93
" The clinical drug-drug interaction study results were reconciled well by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model that incorporated a minor contribution of CYP3A to overall ixazomib clearance and quantitatively considered the strength of induction of CYP3A and intestinal P-glycoprotein by rifampin."( Effects of Strong CYP3A Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor: Results of Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma and a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Ana
Bessudo, A; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Ke, A; Liu, G; Nemunaitis, J; O'Neil, BH; Patel, C; Rasco, DW; Rowland Yeo, K; Sharma, S; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wang, B; Xia, C; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.9

Compound-Compound Interactions

Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) Previous studies investigating the safety and efficacy of ICD in patients with RRMM demonstrate a toxicity profile.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Together, our data suggest the potential for proteasome inhibitor based therapy in CLL and the rationale design of drug combination strategies based on CLL biology."( The investigational agent MLN2238 induces apoptosis and is cytotoxic to CLL cells in vitro, as a single agent and in combination with other drugs.
Advani, P; Akhtar, D; Chanan-Khan, A; Chitta, K; Colon-Otero, G; Foran, J; Khan, AN; Masood, A; Miller, KC; Paulus, A; Rivera, C; Roy, V, 2014
)
0.4
" In a phase 1/2 trial we aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and activity of ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."( Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014
)
0.92
"We report the first clinical investigation conducted in Japan to confirm the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ixazomib alone and combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."( Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Chou, T; Handa, H; Ishizawa, K; Kase, Y; Suzuki, K; Takubo, T, 2017
)
1
" Eighty-eight patients were enrolled across the 3 drug-drug interaction studies; the ixazomib toxicity profile was consistent with previous studies."( Effects of Strong CYP3A Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor: Results of Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma and a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Ana
Bessudo, A; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Ke, A; Liu, G; Nemunaitis, J; O'Neil, BH; Patel, C; Rasco, DW; Rowland Yeo, K; Sharma, S; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wang, B; Xia, C; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.93
" In a preclinical study TNBC cells were treated with the first-generation proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and synergistic efficacy was demonstrated."( Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).
Balic, M; Bartsch, R; Burgstaller, S; Egle, D; Fuchs, D; Gampenrieder, SP; Greil, R; Melchardt, T; Mlineritsch, B; Petru, E; Petzer, A; Rinnerthaler, G; Rossmann, D; Rumpold, H; Singer, CF; Ulmer, H, 2018
)
1.92
" Patients will receive ixazomib in combination with carboplatin on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle."( Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).
Balic, M; Bartsch, R; Burgstaller, S; Egle, D; Fuchs, D; Gampenrieder, SP; Greil, R; Melchardt, T; Mlineritsch, B; Petru, E; Petzer, A; Rinnerthaler, G; Rossmann, D; Rumpold, H; Singer, CF; Ulmer, H, 2018
)
2.23
" A phase I trial of the second-generation proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in combination with MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) was conducted in patients with R/R AML."( A Phase I/II Trial of MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Combination with Ixazomib for Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Advani, AS; Caimi, P; Carew, J; Carraway, H; Chan, R; Cooper, B; de Lima, M; Elson, P; Gerds, A; Hamilton, B; Kalaycio, M; Little, J; Maciejewski, J; Malek, E; Miron, A; Mukherjee, S; Nazha, A; Pink, J; Sekeres, MA; Sobecks, R; Tomlinson, B; Unger, A; Visconte, V; Wei, W, 2019
)
0.98
" The combination of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CD) is a recognised treatment option for patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have relapsed after treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide, whilst also often being combined with newer proteasome inhibitors."( The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020
)
0.77
" The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate whether ixazomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (ICD) has improved clinical activity compared to CD in terms of progression-free survival (PFS)."( The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020
)
1.01
" Previous studies investigating the safety and efficacy of ICD in patients with RRMM demonstrate a toxicity profile consistent with ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, whilst the combination showed possible activity in RRMM patients."( The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020
)
0.97
" In this study, we used a cardiomyocyte model to investigate the molecular cardiotoxic mechanisms of carfilzomib (CFZ) and ixazomib (IXZ) alone or in combination with the immunomodulatory drug dexamethasone (DEX) which is frequently used in combination therapies in the clinic."( Molecular Cardiotoxic Effects of Proteasome Inhibitors Carfilzomib and Ixazomib and Their Combination with Dexamethasone Involve Mitochondrial Dysregulation.
Alpertunga, B; Arslan Eseryel, S; Gunaydin Akyildiz, A; Jannuzzi, AT; Karademir Yilmaz, B; Korkmaz, NS, 2023
)
1.35
"Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."( Real-world effectiveness of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the REMIX study.
Barrak, J; Benboubker, L; Calmettes, C; Charvet-Rumpler, A; Chouaid, C; Clement-Filliatre, L; Honeyman, F; Hulin, C; Karlin, L; Laribi, K; Leleu, X; Macro, M; Maloisel, F; Richez, V; Stoppa, AM; Vincent, L; Zerazhi, H, 2023
)
2.65

Bioavailability

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) was central to the development of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib, facilitating internal decisions. Many recent studies have investigated the safety of orally bioavailable prote asome inhibitors, such as ix Razomib and oprozomib. IxazomIB is an orally bio available proteasomesome inhibitor with a rapid proteasomal dissociation rate.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"MLN9708 (ixazomib citrate) is an investigational, orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor that is under development by Millennium in clinical studies in both hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies."( Syntheses of C-13 and C-14-labeled versions of the investigational proteasome inhibitor MLN9708.
Elliott, EL; Li, Y; Plesescu, M; Prakash, SR,
)
0.55
" Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor."( Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014
)
1.54
" Estimated absolute bioavailability and clearance were 60% and 2l h(-1), respectively."( Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015
)
0.63
"This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, in patients with myeloma who have limited prior exposure to bortezomib."( Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib.
Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, FK; Chanan-Khan, A; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Hwa, L; Kapoor, P; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, B; Laumann, K; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Rivera, CE; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Thompson, MA; Witzig, TE, 2015
)
1.02
" The unsuccessful clinical trials of proteasome inhibitor PS-341 (bortezomib) in solid tumors led to the invention of MLN9708 (ixazomib), an orally bioavailable next-generation proteasome inhibitor with improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features."( Next-generation proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 sensitizes breast cancer cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis.
Cao, WM; Cui, Y; Dou, J; Jiang, Z; Wang, H; Wang, Z; Yu, Y; Zhang, H; Zhao, Y, 2016
)
0.64
" We chose ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, because of its favorable physiochemical characteristics."( Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Ixazomib Combination Rescues Mice Subjected to Experimental Graft-versus-Host Disease and Is Superior to Either Agent Alone.
Abdel-Mageed, S; Al-Homsi, AS; Cole, K; Feng, Y; Goodyke, A; McLane, M; Muilenburg, M, 2017
)
1.12
" Ixazomib is an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor with a rapid proteasome dissociation rate."( Ixazomib suppresses human dendritic cell and modulates murine graft-versus-host disease in a schedule-dependent fashion.
Abdel-Mageed, S; Al-Homsi, AS; Cole, K; Feng, Y; Goodyke, A; McLane, M; Muilenburg, M, 2017
)
2.81
" Many recent studies have investigated the safety of orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitors, such as ixazomib and oprozomib."( Proteasome inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.
Gibson, RJ; Stansborough, RL, 2017
)
0.67
"gov identifier NCT01454076) assessed the relative bioavailability of capsule B in reference to capsule A in adult patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma."( A Phase 1 Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of Two Capsule Formulations of Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma.
Bessudo, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Nemunaitis, J; O'Neil, BH; Sharma, S; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wang, B, 2018
)
0.7
" The orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN2238 (ixazomib) has been demonstrated to have anticancer activity."( Preclinical evaluation of antitumor activity of the proteasome inhibitor MLN2238 (ixazomib) in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.
Augello, G; Azzolina, A; Cassata, G; Cervello, M; Cusimano, A; Di Sano, C; Emma, MR; Modica, M; Montalto, G; Puleio, R, 2018
)
0.95
"Model-informed drug development (MIDD) was central to the development of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib, facilitating internal decisions (switch from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, inclusive phase III trials, portfolio prioritization of ixazomib-based combinations, phase III dose for maintenance treatment), regulatory review (model-informed QT analysis, benefit-risk of 4 mg dose), and product labeling (absolute bioavailability and intrinsic/extrinsic factors)."( Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor.
Berg, D; Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Ke, A; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Patel, C; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H, 2019
)
1
"5 days) with first-order linear absorption (oral bioavailability of 58%)."( Clinical Pharmacology of Ixazomib: The First Oral Proteasome Inhibitor.
Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Labotka, R; Venkatakrishnan, K; Xia, C, 2019
)
0.82
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

This analysis supports a switch from BSA-based to fixed dosing, without dose modification for mild/moderate renal impairment or age. Ixazomib is ideally suited for maintenance therapy given its convenient once-weekly oral dosing and low toxicity profile.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Moreover, antitumor activity was shown via multiple dosing routes, including oral gavage."( Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer.
Bannerman, B; Berger, A; Blank, J; Bolen, J; Bruzzese, F; Cao, Y; Dick, L; Fitzgerald, M; Fleming, P; Garcia, K; Hales, P; Kupperman, E; Lee, EC; Liu, J; Manfredi, M; Rolfe, M; Tsu, C; Yang, Y; Yu, J; Yu, L, 2010
)
0.36
"Data were pooled from 226 adult patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma or solid tumours in four phase 1 studies, in which ixazomib dosing (oral/intravenous, once/twice weekly) was based on BSA."( Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015
)
0.84
"23 mg m(-2)) and fixed (4 mg) oral dosing with no trend in simulated AUC vs."( Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015
)
0.63
"This analysis supports a switch from BSA-based to fixed dosing, without dose modification for mild/moderate renal impairment or age, in future adult studies of ixazomib, simplifying dosing guidance and clinical development."( Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015
)
0.83
" The current analysis characterized the exposure-safety and exposure-efficacy relationships of ixazomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with a purpose of recommending an approach to ixazomib dosing for maintenance therapy."( Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study.
Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016
)
0.91
" Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the (i) pharmacology and dosing of ixazomib, (ii) the efficacy and safety data from clinical studies, (iii) highlight the various novel combinations that have been reported, and (iv) give an overview of the ongoing studies with ixazomib."( Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma.
Abeykoon, JP; Kapoor, P; Zanwar, S, 2018
)
2.15
" The sensitivity of human colorectal carcinoma cells to the PI Ixazomib was assessed via in vitro and in vivo dose-response experiments."( Non-invasive imaging of disrupted protein homeostasis induced by proteasome inhibitor treatment using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI.
Bradley, D; Chattopadhyay, N; Gibb, A; Golay, X; Johnson, SP; Lythgoe, MF; Pedley, RB; Ramasawmy, R; Taylor, V; Walker-Samuel, S; Zhu, Y, 2018
)
0.72
" Ixazomib is ideally suited for maintenance therapy given its convenient once-weekly oral dosing and low toxicity profile."( Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Beksac, M; Chng, WJ; Dash, AB; Dimopoulos, MA; Gay, F; Goldschmidt, H; Gupta, N; Hajek, R; Iida, S; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Maisnar, V; Mateos, MV; Min, CK; Moreau, P; Morgan, G; Palumbo, A; Pluta, A; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Skacel, T; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; Weisel, KC; Zweegman, S, 2019
)
1.94
" B cell activating factor plasma levels were significantly higher after ixazomib dosing in those who remained cGVHD free compared with those developed cGVHD."( Ixazomib for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Abedin, S; Chhabra, S; D'Souza, A; Dhakal, B; Douglas Rizzo, J; Drobyski, WR; Fenske, TS; Hamadani, M; Hari, PN; Horowitz, MM; Jerkins, JH; Pasquini, MC; Runaas, L; Saber, W; Shah, NN; Shaw, BE; Tang, X; Thompson, R; Visotcky, A; Zhang, MJ; Zhu, F, 2020
)
2.23
" Here, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of ixazomib dosing schedules."( Safety and Effectiveness of Ixazomib Dose-escalating Strategy in Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Boku, S; Higai, K; Kagoo, T; Niijima, D; Ogawa, C; Ohashi, Y; Tani, K; Ueno, H; Yachi, Y; Yano, T; Yatabe, M; Yokoyama, A,
)
0.67
"A dose-escalation strategy to optimise ixazomib dosing may reduce treatment interruption due to adverse events without compromising its antitumor activity."( Safety and Effectiveness of Ixazomib Dose-escalating Strategy in Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Boku, S; Higai, K; Kagoo, T; Niijima, D; Ogawa, C; Ohashi, Y; Tani, K; Ueno, H; Yachi, Y; Yano, T; Yatabe, M; Yokoyama, A,
)
0.69
" The developed framework represents an integrated approach to describing safety and efficacy with MM therapy, enabling the simulation of prospective trials and potential alternate dosing regimens."( Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients.
Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022
)
0.96
"We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the all-oral regimen of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with the use of metronomic cyclophosphamide dosing in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."( Ixazomib, Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone for First-Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Brown University Oncology Group Study.
Barth, P; Olszewski, AJ; Pelcovits, A; Reagan, JL; Rosati, V; Sturtevant, A; Winer, ES; Wood, R, 2023
)
2.59
" Collectively, these results highlight the value of safety-driven personalized dosing to maximize patient benefit/risk."( Dose Titration of Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Exposure-Response Analysis of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study.
Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK, 2023
)
1.24
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
apoptosis inducerAny substance that induces the process of apoptosis (programmed cell death) in multi-celled organisms.
orphan drugAny drug that has been developed specifically for treatment of a rare medical condition, the condition itself being known as an orphan disease.
proteasome inhibitorA drug that blocks the action of proteasomes, cellular complexes that break down proteins.
drug metabolitenull
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
benzamides
dichlorobenzeneAny member of the class of chlorobenzenes carrying two chloro groups at unspecified positions.
glycine derivativeA proteinogenic amino acid derivative resulting from reaction of glycine at the amino group or the carboxy group, or from the replacement of any hydrogen of glycine by a heteroatom.
boronic acidsCompounds having the structure RB(OH)2.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (26)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.41760.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
PPM1D proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.10440.00529.466132.9993AID1347411
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.30300.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
polyproteinZika virusPotency0.41760.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.10440.00339.158239.8107AID1347411
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Proteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01630.00060.73766.3700AID1559513; AID1604182; AID706736
Proteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.36985.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00100.76115.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.69125.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00650.00050.939410.0000AID1396601; AID1559513; AID1604186; AID1864383; AID706738
Proteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.81515.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.18170.00131.39067.9540AID1559513; AID1604184; AID706737
Proteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunitStaphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325IC50 (µMol)5.30005.30005.30005.3000AID1605096
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 Mus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.19950.00041.441910.0000AID1864382
Proteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.70995.0000AID1559513
Proteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01500.00130.68435.0000AID1559513
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunitStaphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325EC50 (µMol)3.60003.60003.60003.6000AID1605098
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (53)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
proteolysisProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiationProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
immune system processProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
response to virusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentationProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
fat cell differentiationProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
immune system processProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cell morphogenesisProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferationProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to organonitrogen compoundProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasomal protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
meiotic cell cycleProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of meiosis IProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (15)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
purine ribonucleoside triphosphate bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (27)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
ciliary basal bodyProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
ribosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
myofibrilProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
sarcomereProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolNACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 Mus musculus (house mouse)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (78)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1604184Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 2c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID706738Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta5 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1396604Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1864383Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta5 subunit (unknown origin) using Suc-LLVY-AMC as flurogenic substrate measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1605096Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1605100Cytotoxicity in human HeLa cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1864429Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS-primed mouse J774.A1 cells assessed as reduction in IL-1beta secretion at 1 uM relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1396605Cytotoxicity against human U266B1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1605101Cytotoxicity in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1605097Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) assessed as Kinact/Ki ratio pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1396606Cytotoxicity against human ARH77 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1605099Induction of hemolysis in sheep erythrocytes by measuring hemoglobin release incubated for 15 mins2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1604186Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1604182Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 1c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1882258Inhibition of proteasome (unknown origin)2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 229A review on the treatment of multiple myeloma with small molecular agents in the past five years.
AID706737Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta2 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1559513Inhibition of human 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate measured every 5 mins for 120 mins by fluorescence based assay
AID1453444Inhibition of recombinant human C-MYC/DDK-tagged ENGase expressed in HEK293T cells at 100 uM using heat inactivated bovine ribonuclease B as substrate pretreated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition after 90 mins by SDS-PAGE analysis2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
Repurposing of Proton Pump Inhibitors as first identified small molecule inhibitors of endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (ENGase) for the treatment of NGLY1 deficiency, a rare genetic disease.
AID1864382Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS-primed mouse J774.A1 cells assessed as reduction in IL-1beta secretion preincubated for 1 hr followed by nigericin stimulation and measured after 1 hr by ELISA2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1396601Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate incubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 1 hr by spectrofluorimetric method2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1605098Inhibition of ClpP in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33591 assessed as reduction in bacteria-induced hemolysis of sheep erythrocytes by measuring hemoglobin release incubated for 15 mins2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID706736Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta1 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1396623Bioavailability in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1.2 mg/kg, ig by LC-MS/MS analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1439192Drug metabolism in human plasma administered as iv bolus dose after 30 mins2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID1745855NCATS anti-infectives library activity on the primary C. elegans qHTS viability assay2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1347412qHTS assay to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: Counter screen cell viability and HiBit confirmation2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (292)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's148 (50.68)24.3611
2020's144 (49.32)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 65.71

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index65.71 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.94 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index108.06 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (65.71)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials78 (26.00%)5.53%
Reviews51 (17.00%)6.00%
Case Studies18 (6.00%)4.05%
Observational4 (1.33%)0.25%
Other149 (49.67%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (152)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Open-Label Phase 1 Study to Assess the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Ixazomib Administered Intravenously to Pediatric Patients Aged 0 to <18 Years With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, With or Without Extramed [NCT03888534]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Business decision (no safety or efficacy concerns))
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01564537]Phase 3722 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-01Completed
Phase Ib/II Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Oral Ixazomib in the Prophylaxis of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease. [NCT03225417]Phase 1/Phase 2142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of MLN9708 (Ixazomib [I]), Venetoclax (V), and Dexamethasone (D) Regimen (IVD) to Restore or Enhance Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) Sensitivity in Non-t(11;14) Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT03856112]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-21Withdrawn(stopped due to Per CTEP, Martha Khrum this study is withdrawn. Changing status to update CT.gov)
An Open-Label, Rollover Protocol for Patients Previously Enrolled in Millennium-Sponsored Ixazomib Studies [NCT02924272]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-16Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of DaRatumumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone vs Daratumumab, Bortezomib (VElcade) and Dexamethasone Followed by Daratumumab-Ixazomib-Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (DeRIVE Study) [NCT03942224]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-03Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Trial of Pembrolizumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03506360]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-19Completed
Phase II Trial of Ixazomib and Dexamethasone Versus Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide, Randomized With NFKB2 Rearrangement. (Proteasome Inhibitor NFKB2 Rearrangement Driven Trial, PINR) [NCT02765854]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Trial of Continuation of Post-Transplant Maintenance With Single-Agent Lenalidomide vs. Consolidation/Maintenance With Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone in Patients With Residual Myeloma [NCT02389517]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Combination With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone as Second Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Have Received Prior Treatment With a Lenalidomid [NCT03746652]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial Studying the Efficacy of a Triplet Combination of MLN9708, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as Induction Prior to, and as Consolidation After High-dose Therapy With Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by MLN9708 Maintenance in the I [NCT01936532]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-12Completed
A Phase I Study of the Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Selinexor in Combination With the Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib for the Treatment of Advanced Sarcoma [NCT03880123]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study will not proceed, no participants enrolled.)
A Randomised Phase II Trial of Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Combination With Ixazomib in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Who Have Relapsed After Treatment With Thalidomide, Lenalidomide and Bortezomib. [NCT02461888]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Active, not recruiting
MLN9708 for the Prophylaxis of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease in Patient Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation [NCT02250300]Phase 1/Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-19Completed
Phase I Study of the Combination of MLN9708 and Fulvestrant in Patients With Advanced Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [NCT02384746]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-02Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Myeloma XIV: A Phase III Trial to Compare Standard and Frailty-adjusted Induction Therapy With Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) and Maintenance Lenalidomide (R) to Lenalidomide Plus Ixazomib (R+I) [NCT03720041]Phase 3740 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-04Recruiting
An Open-label Phase I/II Trial of Venetoclax-Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory t(11;14) Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis [NCT05451771]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-26Recruiting
Pilot Study of Ixazomib to Reduce the Number of HIV DNA Positive Lymphoid Cells [NCT02946047]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-20Completed
Open Label Phase II Study of Ixazomib for the Prevention of Recurrent or Late Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease at 1-year After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT03082677]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-10Completed
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Next-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, Administered in Combination With a Standard Care Regimen of Melphalan and Prednisone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple [NCT01335685]Phase 1/Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-27Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Ixazomib and Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03323151]Phase 1/Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-13Active, not recruiting
A Multicentre Open-label Phase II Study of Ixazomib -Daratumumab Without Dexamethasone (IDara) in Elderly Relapse Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03757221]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-07Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of MLN9708 in Combination With MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine) for Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT02070458]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-08Completed
Multicenter Phase II, Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Maintenance Ixazomib After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Multiple Myeloma (BMT CTN 1302) [NCT02440464]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Ixazomib and Romidepsin in Relapsed/ Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) [NCT03547700]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-26Active, not recruiting
Phase 1/2 Trial of Ixazomib in Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma or Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT01864018]Phase 1/Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-20Active, not recruiting
Ixazomib (MLN9708) and Dexamethasone in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Clinical and Correlative Pilot Study [NCT02697383]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Open-label Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory Autoimmune Cytopenia [NCT03965624]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Decision of sponsor: impossibility of contract with Takeda)
An Open-label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Initially Treated With an Injection of Proteasome [NCT03416374]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-18Completed
Phase I/II Study Augmenting TAK-659 Action in Relapsed/Refractory AML by Addition of the Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-HEM17-092 [NCT04079738]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-20Terminated(stopped due to Funder requested termination due to halting internal development of TAK-659)
A Phase I/II Study of the Addition of Ixazomib to ONC201 and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03492138]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-26Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
Ixazomib in Combination With Thalidomide - Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02410694]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Toward a Risk-adapted Strategy to Cure Myeloma : An Intensive Program With Lenalidomide, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone Plus Daratumumab as Extended Induction and Consolidation Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk Multiple My [NCT03669445]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Open-Label Pilot Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Ixazomib Administered Orally to Patients With Scleroderma-Related Interstitial Lung Disease [NCT04837131]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-28Recruiting
Phase II Study of the Combination of Daratumumab, Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Protocol (UCHMC1809) [NCT03590652]Phase 246 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-17Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective Study of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Ixazomib in Combination With Lenalidomide for Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04217967]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-03Recruiting
A Phase IB/II Trial of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®), Ixazomib and Rituximab (RIXAR) as Front-line Therapy for High Risk Indolent B Cell Lymphoma [NCT02898259]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-20Terminated(stopped due to Funding was eliminated.)
A Phase I-II Trial of DA-EPOCH-R Plus Ixazomib as Frontline Therapy for Patients With MYC-aberrant Lymphoid Malignancies: The DACIPHOR Regimen [NCT02481310]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-28Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Study of Ixazomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed and Treatment-Naive Multiple Myeloma Patients Non-Eligible for Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation [NCT03608501]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Business decision (no safety or efficacy concerns))
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Japanese Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02917941]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-01Completed
A Phase I/II Study of MLN9708 as Post-Transplant Maintenance for Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in First Remission [NCT02632396]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-01Active, not recruiting
Optimizing Prolonged Treatment In Myeloma Using MRD Assessment (OPTIMUM) [NCT03941860]Phase 3510 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-16Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone [NCT03433001]295 participants (Actual)Observational2018-04-02Completed
"NINLARO Capsules Drug Use-Results Survey (All-Case Surveillance) Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma" [NCT03169361]774 participants (Actual)Observational2017-05-24Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01850524]Phase 3705 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-29Completed
Phase I Study of MLN 9708 in Addition to Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults [NCT02228772]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Phase 1 / 2 Trial of Idasanutlin in Combination With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With 17p Deleted, Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02633059]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy After Initial Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Treated With Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02312258]Phase 3706 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-09Completed
A Phase I Study of Ixazomib and Erlotinib in Advanced Solid Tumor Patients [NCT02942095]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-06Completed
Phase 2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Extramedullary Disease or Plasma Cell Leukemia [NCT02547662]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-24Completed
A Phase 1 Study of MLN9708 in Japanese Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04272775]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-05Terminated(stopped due to Business Decision; No Safety Or Efficacy Concerns)
Myeloma-Developing Regimens Using Genomics (MyDRUG) (Genomics Guided Multi-arm Trial of Targeted Agents Alone or in Combination With a Backbone Regimen) [NCT03732703]Phase 1/Phase 2228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
A Prospective Phase 2 Study to Assess the Minimal Residual Disease After Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (IRd) Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Myeloma Patients [NCT03376672]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability Study of Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Asian Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01645930]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-17Completed
Phase II Study of Targeting CD28 in Multiple Myeloma With Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) to Overcome Resistance to Chemotherapy [NCT03457142]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-11Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Ixazomib (NINLARO®) in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Receiving a Bortezomib-Based Induction Regim [NCT03173092]Phase 4141 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-20Active, not recruiting
A Multi-center, Open-label, Single-arm Clinical Study of Ixazomib/Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone (IxaPD) in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04989140]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-26Recruiting
A Phase III Study to Determine the Role of Ixazomib as an Augmented Conditioning Therapy in Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and as a Post-ASCT Consolidation and Maintenance Strategy in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03562169]Phase 3406 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-20Recruiting
A Phase I Two-Dimensional Dose-Finding Study of Ixazomib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Doxorubicin, Followed by a Phase II Extension to Assess the Efficacy of This Combination in Metastatic, Surgically Unresectable Urothelial Cancer [NCT02420847]Phase 1/Phase 257 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized Trial Evaluating Ixazomib Compared to Ixazomib-Lenalidomide Combination Maintenance Therapy for Frontline Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT03733691]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient enrollment)
Phase II Study Of Ixazomib As Maintenance Therapy For Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) And High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) In Remission [NCT02302846]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-20Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
Alternating the Administration of Ixazomib and Lenalidomide as Maintenance Therapy After Autologous Transplant for Treating Multiple Myeloma [NCT02619682]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-30Active, not recruiting
Bone Healing During Ninlaro Exposure. An Open Label Phase 2 Single Centre Clinical Trial [NCT04028115]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-24Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of a Novel Proteasome/IMiD Combination, Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT02578121]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator decided to close study without enrollment)
Multicenter Open Label Phase 2 Single Arm Study of Ixazomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Characterized With Genomic Abnormalities of Adverse Adverse Prognostic [NCT03683277]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-03Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment issue, 26 patients enrolled instead of 70 initially planned)
A Phase 2 Study of Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Combination With Dose-Attenuated Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT04052880]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-24Recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of MLN9708 Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Relapsed or Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02119468]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib/Dexamethasone and Oral Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03170882]Phase 2122 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
"A Multi-center Open-label Phase 2 Study of Ixazomib, Iberdomide and Dexamethasone in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma at First Relapse." [NCT04998786]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-14Active, not recruiting
China Continuation: A Single-Arm, Open-Label Study of Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy After Initial Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Treated With Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03748953]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-24Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial of Venetoclax (ABT-199) in Combination With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone for Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03399539]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-02Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), A Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Lymphoma [NCT00893464]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
An Investigator-Initiated Phase I Study of Selinexor (KPT-330), Ixazomib, and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02831686]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
An Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Phase 1 Study of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Advanced Nonhematologic Malignancies [NCT00830869]Phase 1116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-02Completed
A Single-arm, Multisite, Prospective Study of Ixazomib-pomalidomide-dexamethasone as Second or Third-line Combination Treatment for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Previously Treated With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Bortezo [NCT04790474]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-25Recruiting
MLN9708 (Ixazomib) and MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Phase 1b Trial [NCT03770260]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-10Completed
An Open-Label, Non-Comparative, Two-Cohort, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Ixazomib (NINLARO®) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (IPd, Cohort A) or With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRd, Cohort B) in Pati [NCT05183139]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Business decision (no enrollment))
Standard Maintenance [POMP/D (Methotrexate, 6 - Mercaptopurine, Vincristine, Prednisone/Dexamethasone)] Plus Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Lymphoblastic Lymphoma or Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia in Complete Rem [NCT02578511]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-29Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment, another competing study and difficult to find the right person to enroll on this study.)
A Phase II Study of IRD (Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone) for Consolidation Therapy Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Maintenance Ixazomib or Lenalidomide for Multiple Myeloma [NCT02253316]Phase 2236 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/1a Study of Venetoclax, MLN9708 (Ixazomib Citrate) and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT04847453]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-03Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Combination of Ixazomib and Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma [NCT02916771]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00932698]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-12Completed
Phase 2 Trial of Induction With Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone Prior to Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Followed by Consolidation With Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone and Ixazomib Maintenance in Multiple Myeloma [NCT03202628]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-24Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone Plus MLN9708 or Physicians Choice of Treatment Administered to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis [NCT01659658]Phase 3177 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-12Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor's decision)
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study of the Oral Formulation of MLN9708 Administered Weekly in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Who Require Further Treatment [NCT01318902]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-27Completed
A Window Study of Ixazomib in Untreated Indolent B-NHL [NCT02339922]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-19Active, not recruiting
Quality of Life, Symptoms and Treatment Satisfaction in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Receiving Ixazomib (Ninlaro®) in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in a Real World Setting: Pilot Study [NCT03903406]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-05-31Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Re [NCT01217957]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-22Completed
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Weekly Dosing of the Oral Form of MLN9708, a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00963820]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Evaluation of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Induction and Extended Consolidation Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients ≤65 Years Eligible for High Dose Therapy [NCT02897830]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-05Terminated(stopped due to negatives results)
Phase I/II Study of Ixazomib in Combination With Pomalidomide, Clarithromycin and Dexamethasone (PiC-D) in Patients With Double Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02542657]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
Ixazomib (MLN9708) in Combination With Carboplatin in Pretreated Women With Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT02993094]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-21Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow recruitment, the study had to be terminated prematurely.)
A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ixazomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04119336]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-14Terminated(stopped due to Study closure initiated by industry funding sponsor for commercial reasons.)
A Phase 2 Study of Ixazomib and Rituximab in Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT04047797]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-28Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Ixazomib Combined With Gemcitabine and Doxorubicin in Patients With Renal Medullary Carcinoma [NCT03587662]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-17Recruiting
Multicenter Phase II Study of Ixazomib Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03616782]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-24Recruiting
Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib Combinations in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01415882]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Ibrutinib in Combination With Ixazomib in Patients With Waldenström Macroglobulinemia [NCT03506373]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-05Active, not recruiting
Pomalidomide, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone (PId) With or Without Intensification by Cyclophosphamide (PICd): A Phase II Study in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03731832]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Plus Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia [NCT04463953]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-20Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination With Backbone Treatments for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02343042]Phase 1/Phase 2518 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of MLN9708 (Ixazomib) in Combination With Panobinostat and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02057640]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-22Completed
Phase 1 Study of Tasquinimod Alone and in Combination With Standard Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma [NCT04405167]Phase 134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-10Recruiting
MLN9708 and Dexamethasone in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Clinical and Correlative Pilot Study [NCT01660997]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-30Withdrawn
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Formulation of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), Administered Twice-weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment [NCT01383928]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Combination of MLN 9708 With Lenalidomide as Maintenance Therapy Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01718743]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-03Completed
Phase II Prospective Evaluation of Bone Remodeling During Ixazomib Treatment Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT02499081]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Twice Weekly Ixazomib Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04094961]Phase 1/Phase 261 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-18Recruiting
Phase I Study Of Vincristine, Doxorubicin, And Dexamethasone (VXD) Plus Ixazomib In Adults With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma, Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Or Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia [NCT01887587]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to SAE- risk of overall protocol treatment outweighs benefits)
Phase II Trial of Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Rituximab in Patients With Untreated Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT02400437]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Millennium 9708 in Combination With Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Adults >= 60 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02582359]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
BrUOG 299: Ixazomib, Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone for First-Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Brown University Oncology Group Study. [NCT02412228]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Active, not recruiting
A TACL Phase 1/2 Study of PO Ixazomib in Combination With Chemotherapy for Childhood Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma IND# 140730 [NCT03817320]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-12Recruiting
[NCT02406144]Phase 3316 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Id and Rd Maintenance Regimens After Induction of Remission in Multiple Myeloma: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study [NCT05477797]420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-15Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide, Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04009109]Phase 2188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-21Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Ixazomib vs. Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Relapsing on Lenalidomide as Part of First Line Therapy [NCT02004275]Phase 1/Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Nelfinavir Plus MLN9708 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma [NCT03422874]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor withdrew support)
A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral IXAZOMIB (MLN9708) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Hematologic Malignancies With Varying Degrees of Liver Dysfunction [NCT01912222]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A MULTIARM, OPEN LABEL, RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF MLN9708 PLUS ORAL DEXAMETHASONE or PLUS ORAL CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE or PLUS ORAL THALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE FOLLOWED BY MAINTENANCE WITH MLN9708 IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED ELDERLY MULTIPLE MYELOM [NCT02586038]Phase 2175 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
Exploratory Study of Ixazomib in Combination With Reduced Dose Lenalidomide Versus Ixazomib Alone for Maintenance Treatment of High Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT05722405]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Ixazomib for Treatment of Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease [NCT02513498]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-08Completed
Phase 0 Analysis of Ixazomib (MLN9708) in Patients With Glioblastoma [NCT02630030]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-24Completed
A Phase I Study of MLN9708 and Vorinostat to Target Autophagy in Patients With Advanced p53 Mutant Malignancies [NCT02042989]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-27Completed
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation vs. Conventional Therapy as Salvage Therapy for Relapsed / Progressive Patients With Multiple Myeloma After First-line Therapy [NCT05675319]Phase 3482 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-03Recruiting
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Oral Combination of Ixazomib (MLN9708) With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment [NCT02046070]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-05Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Mezigdomide Plus Ixazomib and Dexamethasone for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT06050512]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-02Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd), Followed by Daratumumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone (DId) for Relapsed and/or Refractory Myeloma [NCT03763162]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-17Recruiting
Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03012880]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-12Active, not recruiting
Safety of Ixazomib Targeting Plasma Cells in Multiple Sclerosis: A Phase 1b Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. [NCT03783416]Phase 172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-20Recruiting
Ixazomib for Desensitization in Kidney Transplantation [NCT03213158]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-15Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of Ixazomib+Daratumumab+Dexamethasone (IDd) in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT03439293]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-13Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) (KarMMa-3) [NCT03651128]Phase 3381 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-16Active, not recruiting
Open-label, Single-center Phase II Study of MLN9708 (Ixazomib) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas [NCT02158975]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Study of Multiple Rising Doses of MLN9708 for the Treatment of Subjects With ISN / RPS Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis [NCT02176486]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-09Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient enrollment, no safety or efficacy concerns)
Phase 1/1b Pharmacokinetics Study of Oral MLN9708 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Advanced Solid Tumors With Normal Renal Function or Severe Renal Impairment [NCT01830816]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-16Completed
Phase 1/2 Study Of Ixazomib In Combination With Cyclophosphamide And Dexamethasone In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Immunoglobulin Light Chain AL Amyloidosis [NCT03236792]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-12Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent MLN9708 for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Mutated Nucleophosmin-1 [NCT02030405]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Regulatory)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Citrate (MLN9708) Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant [NCT02181413]Phase 3656 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Oral IXAZOMIB (MLN9708) to Assess Relative Bioavailability, Food Effect, Drug-Drug Interaction With Ketoconazole, Clarithromycin or Rifampin; and Safety and Tolerability in Patients With Advanced Nonhematologic Malignancies or Lymphoma [NCT01454076]Phase 1112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-10Completed
A Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib for Kaposi Sarcoma [NCT04305691]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-07Recruiting
Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Patients With POEMS Syndrome [NCT02921893]Early Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Nonmyeloablative Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Followed By Maintenance Therapy With the Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, MLN9708, in Patients With High-risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02169791]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-15Completed
Ixazomib Maintenance Following Initial Therapy in Patients With Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis [NCT03618537]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-02Active, not recruiting
A Safety Study of Daratumumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone in AL Amyloidosis [NCT03283917]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-07Active, not recruiting
A Feasibility Study of Myeloablative BEAM Allogeneic Transplantation Followed by Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Relapsed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT02504359]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-20Completed
Solitary Plasmacytoma of Bone: Randomized Phase III Trial to Evaluate Treatment With Adjuvant Systemic Treatment and Zoledronic Acid Versus Zoledronic Acid After Definite Radiation Therapy [NCT02516423]Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of [ 14 C]-Ixazomib to Assess Mass Balance, Pharmacokinetics, and Metabolism in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma [NCT01953783]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-19Completed
Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine and IXAZOMIB (MLN9708) Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02477215]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-09Completed
Phase I/II Study of Ixazomib With Pegylated IFN-alpha 2b (pIFN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [NCT02447887]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-14Terminated(stopped due to IRB study closure facilitated by Investigator)
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Oral IXAZOMIB (MLN9708) in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01939899]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Open-Label Study to Determine the Feasibility of MLN9708 as Maintenance After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma, Followed by an Expansion Phase at the Maximum-Tolerated Dose (MTD) - A Phase II Study [NCT02168101]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC (0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 2: Ixazomib Concentration in Postdose Clinical Tumor Samples in Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: E Max: Maximum Observed Effect for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: C0: Initial Plasma Concentration After Bolus Intravenous Administration
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC (0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant TEAEs Related to Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT00830869 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Overall Response
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]CLr: Renal Clearance
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]C0: Initial Plasma Concentration After Bolus Intravenous Administration
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) for Ixazomib
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Ae (0-4): Amount of Drug Excreted in Urine From 0 to 4 Hours Postdose
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Overall Best Response
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Rac: Accumulation Ratio for Ixazomib
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting at Least 1 TEAE Related to Laboratory Assessments
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Fe (0-4): Fraction of Dose Excreted Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 4 Hours Postdose
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Emax: Maximum Observed Effect for Ixazomib
NCT00893464 (15) [back to overview]Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]AUC(0-last): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities Reported as TEAEs
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a TEAE of Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]T1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Elimination Half-life for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]λz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT00932698 (14) [back to overview]AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio: Day 15 AUC0-168 / Day 1 AUC0-168 for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Overall Response to Treatment With Ixazomib Citrate Based on Investigator's Evaluation Over Time
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Neurotoxicity Grading
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for MLN2238
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]TEmax: Time of Occurrence of Emax
NCT00963820 (11) [back to overview]Emax: Maximum Inhibition
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Ixazomib Given in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: 1 Year Survival Rate
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Following Treatment With the Combination Of Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide And Low-Dose Dexamethasone
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Time to Best Response
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher AEs, SAEs and Treatment Discontinuation
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Near Complete Response (nCR), Partial Response (PR) and Minimal Response (MR)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib Administered Weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone
NCT01217957 (18) [back to overview]Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Hematologic Response to Treatment Based on Investigators Assessment
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Organ Response to Treatment Based on Investigators Assessment
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Ctrough: Plasma Concentration Immediately Prior to Dosing for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Emax: Maximum Observed Percent Inhibition of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Organ Disease Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Peripheral Neuropathy Reported as a TEAE
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With One Year Hematologic Disease PFS
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Hematologic Response
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Time to Hematologic Disease Progression
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Time to Organ Disease Progression
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]AUC0-168: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as TEAE
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Ctrough: Plasma Concentration Immediately Prior to Dosing for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]AUC0-168: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]AUE0-168: Area Under Effect Curve of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition From Zero to Concentration at 168 Hours for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Hematologic Response
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Organ Response
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Organ Response
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Hematologic Disease Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib
NCT01318902 (27) [back to overview]TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition for Ixazomib
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Response (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate (Phase 2)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)
NCT01335685 (27) [back to overview]Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 1
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Neurotoxicity
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Time to Response
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16
NCT01383928 (29) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant TEAEs Related to Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT01454076 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]OS in High-Risk Participants
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]PFS in High-Risk Participants
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)
NCT01564537 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Best Response Category
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Adverse Events of ≥Grade 3 Intensity
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Reported as Adverse Events
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01645930 (12) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Hematologic Response
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analogue Scale Score
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Hematologic Disease Progression Free Survival
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Number of Hospitalizations
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]2-Year Vital Organ (Heart or Kidney) Deterioration and Mortality Rate
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Vital Organ Progression Free Survival
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Score
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Time to Vital Organ (Heart or Kidney) Deterioration and Mortality Rate
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Time To Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Time To Subsequent Anticancer Treatment
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Vital Organ (Cardiac and/or Kidney) Response
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Amyloidosis Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up
NCT01659658 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Unbound Cmax: Unbound Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Unbound AUClast: Unbound Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Participants
NCT01830816 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in RRMM Participants
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Pain Response Rate as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) and Analgesic Use
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]OS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MRD-Negative Status as Assessed by Flow Cytometry
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New or Worsening of Existing Skeletal-related Events (SREs)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]PFS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)-2
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Serum Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Based on Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ)-C30 Scale Total Score
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQOL Measured by EORTC-QLQ-MY20 Scale
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01850524 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline to Worst Value in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing a Grade 3 or Greater Adverse Event at Least Possibly Related to Treatment as Assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide (Phase I)
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, or Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort B)
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone (Phase I)
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Survival Time
NCT01864018 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Complete Response or Very Good Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort A)
NCT01887587 (2) [back to overview]Optimal Dose of MLN9708
NCT01887587 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events.
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Values
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Unbound Cmax: Unbound Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
NCT01912222 (6) [back to overview]Unbound AUC(0-last): Unbound Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants With Response Rates in PSMB1 Positive and PSMB1 Negative
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Phase 2: Rate of Disease Control
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01939899 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Radioactivity in Plasma
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Dose Administered in Urine
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Dose Administered in Feces
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Whole Blood Concentration (Cmax) for TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Renal Clearance of Ixazomib
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cumulative Percentage of the Total Radioactivity Dose Excreted in Urine
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Cmax for TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cumulative Percentage of the Total Radioactivity Dose Excreted in Feces
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cumulative Percentage of Ixazomib Dose Recovered in the Urine
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: AUC(0-816): Area Under the Whole Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 816 Hrs Post-dose for TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: AUC(0-816): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 816 Hrs Post-dose for TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Whole Blood Concentration of TRA
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Part A: AUC(0-312): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 312 Hrs Post-dose for Ixazomib
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01953783 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Investigations System Organ Class for Laboratory Values
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II)
NCT02004275 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT02030405 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02030405 (3) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events Related to Ixazomib
NCT02030405 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR + VGR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, and PR in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Combined Response Rate During the Induction Phase in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR and Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD) During the Induction Phase
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR) in NDMM Participants During the Induction Phase
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR) in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs, Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction, SAEs in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, AEs Resulting in Discontinuation and AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With (CR + VGPR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD in RRMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR + VGPR, CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD Throughout the Entire Treatment Period in NDMM Participants
NCT02046070 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) During the Induction Phase in NDMM Participants
NCT02057640 (4) [back to overview]Response to Combination Therapy (Panobinostat, Dexamethasone, MLN9708)
NCT02057640 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02057640 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity According to CTCAE Version 4.03
NCT02057640 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate at the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Response Rate at the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response at the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of MLN9708 (Phase I)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (Phase I)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]One-Year Overall Survival at the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02119468 (7) [back to overview]One-Year Progression-Free Survival at the Recommend Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02158975 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival Time
NCT02158975 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival Time
NCT02158975 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT02158975 (5) [back to overview]Number Patients That Experience Adverse Events, Grades 3-5
NCT02158975 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (cGVHD) After Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Maintenance With MLN9708
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years Post-allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Number of Phase I Patients Receiving 2.3mg, 3mg, or 4mg MLN9708 Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years Post-maintenance Therapy
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3/4/5 Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety of MLN9708 When Used as Maintenance After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Multiple Myeloma
NCT02168101 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (aGVHD) After Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Maintenance With MLN9708
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Recovery Post Transplant
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Relapse or Progression
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Day 30 CD33 Donor Chimerism
NCT02169791 (6) [back to overview]Day 30 CD3 Donor Chimerism
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Complement Protein C3 and C4 at Day 84
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least One Markedly Abnormal Value (MAV) for Hematologic Parameters
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Day 84
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Ixazomib at Each Scheduled Collection Time
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Levels of Autoantibodies (Anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid [dsDNA]) at Day 84
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 84
NCT02176486 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine (sCR) Level at Day 84
NCT02181413 (1) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02250300 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicity of MLN9708
NCT02250300 (3) [back to overview]Maximum-tolerated Dose of MLN9708.
NCT02250300 (3) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease.
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]MRD-negative Rate After ASCT
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]Response Rate of IRD Consolidation
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]Compare Response Rate Between the Two Maintenance Arms
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity of IRD Consolidation
NCT02253316 (6) [back to overview]Rate of MRD-positive to MRD-negative Conversion Between the Two Maintenance Arms
NCT02302846 (1) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Time to Resolution of Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) Events
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Time to Next Line Therapy (TTNT)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Time to Improvement of PN Events
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Time to End of the Next-line of Therapy After Study Treatment
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]PFS in a High-risk Population
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Conversion From Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive to MRD Negative
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Develop a New Primary Malignancy
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]OS in a High-risk Population
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Next-line Therapy
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response Category During the Treatment Period
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Correlation of MRD Status With PFS and OS
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Correlation Between Frailty Status and PFS and OS
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS)
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib
NCT02312258 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response Rate (VGPR) for IDR
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Time to Next Therapy (TTNT)
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02400437 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM Status
NCT02412228 (2) [back to overview]Evaluation of the Toxicities Associated With Ixazomib With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone.
NCT02412228 (2) [back to overview]Evaluation of the Response Rate of Ixazomib With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone for First-line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Time Point
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Infection Type
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Response to Treatment After Randomization
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Time Point
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Toxicity Type
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Short Form 36 (SF-36) Score
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD (Grades III-IV)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Total Score
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Cumulative Response Rates in Patients After Eight Cycles.
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT02481310 (2) [back to overview]12-month PFS (Progression Free Survival) of Treatment With Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R (Phase II)
NCT02481310 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R.
NCT02499081 (1) [back to overview]Change in Serum Osteocalcin From Baseline to End of Study in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Incidence of Discontinuation of All Systemic Immune Suppressive Therapies
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Biologic Studies
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Primary Malignancy Relapse
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Probability of Failure-free Survival at 1 Year
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Probability of Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Probability of Overall Survival at 1 Year
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Probability of Treatment Failure at 6 Months
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Treatment Success
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Use of Additional Systemic Immune Suppressive Therapies
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Complete Response + Partial Response)
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Short Form-36 (SF-36)
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACT)
NCT02513498 (15) [back to overview]Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Human Activities Profile (HAP)
NCT02547662 (5) [back to overview]Extramedullary Response Rate
NCT02547662 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate
NCT02547662 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
NCT02547662 (5) [back to overview]Biochemical Response Rate
NCT02547662 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02619682 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Graded According to CTCAE Version 4.0
NCT02619682 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02619682 (3) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT02630030 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Safety and Tolerability of Ixazomib
NCT02630030 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02630030 (3) [back to overview]Concentration of Ixazomib in Tumor Tissue
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Response (CR) (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Rate of Partial Response (PR) (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Rate of Confirmed Response, Defined as a Patient Who Has Achieved a Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), or Partial Response (PR) on Two Consecutive Evaluations (Phase II)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib Citrate and Idasanutlin in Combination With Dexamethasone (Phase I)
NCT02633059 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 (Phase I)
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Oral Ixazomib
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT02898259 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response (Complete Response (CR) + VGPR)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs Related Laboratory Parameters
NCT02917941 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]Culturable HIV by Quantitative Viral Outgrowth Assay
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]Cell Associated HIV DNA in CD4 T Cell Subsets
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]CD4/CD8 Ratio
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]Absolute CD8 T Cell Count
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]Absolute CD4 T Cell Count
NCT02946047 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT03169361 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03169361 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Health Care Utilization (HU): Number of Participants With at Least One Medical Encounter
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]HU: Duration of Medical Encounters
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module 20 (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Domain Score
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]HRQOL Based on EORTC QLQ-C30 SubScale Score
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]HRQOL Based on EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score
NCT03170882 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Based on 5-level Classification System of the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
NCT03202628 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events Graded According to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version (v) 12.1
NCT03202628 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Alive at 30 Months
NCT03202628 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate
NCT03202628 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT03202628 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 18 Months (PFS18) Defined as the Proportion of Patients Alive and Free From Disease Progression at 18 Months From Study Entry
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Change in Circulating APRIL Levels as Assessed by APRIL ELISA Assay
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Malignancies Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib: as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Distal Neuropathy Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Change in Circulating BAFF Levels as Assessed by BAFF ELISA Assay
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Thrombocytopenia Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Hematological Complications Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal Symptoms Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Complications Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants Caught Infection Within 12 Months
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Efficacy of Ixazomib: Percentage of Participants With > 20 Percent Decline in Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA)
NCT03213158 (11) [back to overview]Efficacy of Ixazomib: Percentage of Participants Received Successful Kidney Transplantation Within 12 Months
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive or Negative in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Based on Global Health Status Scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Based on Global Health Status Scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration of Hospital Stay Per Participants
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy (DOT)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Evaluation of Modified Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Events With Hospitalization Per Participants-Month
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Continuing Treatment With Ixazomib at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved VGPR or Better (CR + VGPR)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]PFS From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve VGPR or Better (CR+VGPR)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]PFS Rate at 12 Months and 24 Months After the Start of Treatment
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Continue to Receive Treatment at 12 Months and 24 Months After Start of Treatment
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)
NCT03433001 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy (DOT)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better (Complete Response + VGPR)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03439293 (7) [back to overview]Time To Response (TTR)
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]>= Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Response Percentage With Pembrolizumab Added to Ixazomib Citrate and Dexamethasone
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]Complete Response Percentage With Pembrolizumab Added to Ixazomib Citrate and Dexamethasone
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Percentage
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]Survival Time
NCT03506360 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT03770260 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity (Dose Escalation)
NCT04079738 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose(s) (RP2D)
NCT04119336 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT04119336 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Tests Abnormalities
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), and Partial Response (PR)
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher TEAE Related to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher TEAE Related to Body Weight
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher TEAE Related to Vital Signs
NCT04272775 (8) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Part 1: AUC (0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib

AUC (0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 11: pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose

,,,,
Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 11
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^291.6301.00
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^2191.87579.91
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^2391.461161.92
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2522.741542.64
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^2620.03800.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)

(NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to Cycle 10 Day 41; Part 2: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to Cycle 12 Day 41

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsSAEs
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^211
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^211
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^210
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^271
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^241
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^264
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^233
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)2210
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Prostate Cancer (PC)116
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STC)197
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC2011
Part 2:Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC)209

[back to top]

Part 2: Ixazomib Concentration in Postdose Clinical Tumor Samples in Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC

The average data of Days 1 and 4 of Cycle 1 was reported. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 4: Predose and (from 4-20 hours) post-dose

Interventionnanogram per gram (ng/g) (Mean)
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC525

[back to top]

Part 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib

T1/2 is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Day 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^2171.90
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^2144.69
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2104.84
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^290.80

[back to top]

Part 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio for Ixazomib

Rac was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-72) on Day 11 and AUC (0-72) on Day 1. AUC (0-72) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours post-dose. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^22.210
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^25.160
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^23.290
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^22.996
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^22.831
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^23.086
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^26.130

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 3.0. DLT is any of following related to ixazomib:Grade (GR) 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count<500 cells/cubic meter[cells/mm^3])for>7 days; GR 3 neutropenia with coincident fever and/or infection; GR 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets <25,000 cells/mm3)for>7 days; GR 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; Platelet count<10,000 cells/mm3; GR 3 peripheral neuropathy;>=GR 3 nausea/emesis in absence of optimal antiemetic therapy; >=GR 3 diarrhoea in absence of optimal supportive therapy;GR 3 QTc prolongation noted on average of 3 electrocardiograms (ECGs);>=GR 3 nonhematological toxicity except GR 3 arthralgia/myalgia or GR 3 fatigue for<1 week; Delay in initiation of subsequent therapy cycle by>7 days due to treatment-related toxicity Other>=GR 2 nonhematological toxicity that opinion of investigator, requires discontinuation of therapy with Ixazomib. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to Cycle 1 Day 21

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^21
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^21
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital sign measurements included diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate, weight and oral temperature. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 12 Day 41)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^20
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20
Part 2:Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC)0
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)0
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STC)0
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Prostate Cancer (PC)0
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC0

[back to top]

Part 1: TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) for Ixazomib

TEmax is the time to reach the Emax, equal to time (hours) to Emax. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 11
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^21.00024.000
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20.1000.080
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20.2500.100
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^20.1000.110
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^20.2500.080
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^20.0800.120
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20.0800.100

[back to top]

Part 1: E Max: Maximum Observed Effect for Ixazomib

E max is the maximum inhibition of 20S proteasome activity in whole blood. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of inhibition (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 11
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^27.704.50
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^217.9010.00
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^228.2046.10
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^235.2239.33
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^246.7354.30
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^262.2061.90
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^267.4070.40

[back to top]

Part 1: C0: Initial Plasma Concentration After Bolus Intravenous Administration

C0 is the plasma drug concentration at time zero following bolus intravenous injection. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 11 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionnanogram per mililiter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 11
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^215.127.1
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^282.569.0
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^2192.083.8
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^2346.70272.57
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^2366.16390.08
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2579.54648.97
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^2901.0869.0

[back to top]

Part 1: AUC (0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib

AUC (0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Part 1: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 11: pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose

Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 11
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^260.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response

Best overall response for a participant is best observed post-baseline disease response as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Partial Response (PR): at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameter. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the baseline smallest sum of longest diameter; persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits. Progressive disease: at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline smallest sum of longest diameter or appearance of 1 or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00830869)
Timeframe: Day 18 up to Day 21 of each cycle (Part 1: up to Cycle 10; Part 2: up to Cycle 12)

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRSDProgressive disease
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20001
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20010
Part 1: Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20001
Part 1: Ixazomib 1 mg/m^20015
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.33 mg/m^20003
Part 1: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^20023
Part 1: Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20020
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)0158
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Prostate Cancer (PC)0037
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STC)0088
Part 2: Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-TPEC00314
Part 2:Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^2-Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC)00510

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1, 8, 15 of each treatment cycle up to 45 treatment cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^20
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

The MTD was defined as the highest dose of ixazomib that generated dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 in 0 of 3 or 1 of 6 participants. DLT defined as any of the following considered possibly related to therapy by investigator: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for >7 days; platelet count <25,000 cells/mm^3; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by maximal supportive therapy; Grade 3 QTc prolongation>500 millisecond (msec);any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except arthralgia/myalgia; <1 week fatigue; delay in the initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >=7 days ; other Grade 2 ixazomib-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Treatment Cycle 1

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
All Participants2.34

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 336 hours postdose)

Interventionhr (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^2292.00
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2146.00
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^2209.39
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^2145.57
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^2107.58
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^2108.39

[back to top]

CLr: Renal Clearance

CLr is the volume of plasma from which the drug is completely removed by the kidney in a given amount of time, calculated as the amount of drug excreted in the urine divided by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, expressed in liter per hour (L/hr). (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15: 0 to 4 hours postdose

,,,,,
InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n= 0, 0,1, 0, 4, 6, 8, 5)Day 15 (n= 0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 3, 6, 2)
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20.0000000.024200
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2NA0.080500
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^20.0570580.098174
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20.0448280.034181
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^20.0853030.085569
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^20.1186860.098459

[back to top]

AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours postdose)

,,,,,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n= 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 6, 7, 5)Day 15 (n= 0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 0, 7, 2)
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^2NA175.0
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2NA732.0
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^2636.81385.4
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^21058.92108.7
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^21683.62537.2
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^2821.0NA

[back to top]

C0: Initial Plasma Concentration After Bolus Intravenous Administration

C0 is the plasma drug concentration at time zero following bolus intravenous injection, obtained from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 336 hours postdose)

,,,,,,,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n= 1, 1, 1, 0, 4, 7, 10, 5)Day 15 (n= 0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 3, 7, 2)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^27.430NA
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^259.400NA
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^2106.00056.300
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2NA383.000
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^2713.883497.189
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^2898.461802.825
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^2961.2051191.973
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^2541.771499.027

[back to top]

TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) for Ixazomib

TEmax: Time to reach the maximum observed effect (Emax), equal to time (hours) to Emax. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours postdose)

,,,,,,,
Interventionhr (Median)
Day 1 (n= 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 7, 5, 4)Day 15 (n= 0, 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 2)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20.25000NA
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20.083300.10000
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20.100000.10000
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^20.083300.08330
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^20.117000.08330
Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^20.083300.08330
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20.083300.16665
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^20.108500.10015

[back to top]

Ae (0-4): Amount of Drug Excreted in Urine From 0 to 4 Hours Postdose

Ae (0-4) is the total amount of drug excreted in the urine from 0 to 4 hours postdose. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15: 0 to 4 hours postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionnanogram (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n= 1, 1, 1, 0, 4, 6, 8, 5)Day 15 (n= 0, 1, 1, 1, 4, 3, 7, 2)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20NA
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^21440661.0
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20568.0
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2NA10200
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^28584.416711.7
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^29897.813128.2
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^225710.440712.9
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^217963.717982.2

[back to top]

Overall Best Response

Overall best response is the best response observed for a participant during the study based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for malignant lymphoma. Complete response (CR) as per IWG is complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. Partial response (PR) is a minimum of 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of other nodes. Stable disease (SD) is when a participant fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for PD. PD is any new lesion or increase by >50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 45

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20001
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20001
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^20010
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^20001
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^20112
Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^21024
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20224
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^20102

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^210
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^210
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^210
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^210
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^242
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^2104
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m²53
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^271

[back to top]

Rac: Accumulation Ratio for Ixazomib

Rac was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-168) on Day 15 and AUC (0-168) on Day 1. AUC (0-168) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours postdose)

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^22.174
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^22.267
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^22.113

[back to top] [back to top]

Fe (0-4): Fraction of Dose Excreted Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 4 Hours Postdose

Fe (0-4) is the fraction of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine from 0 to 4 hours postdose, calculated as percentage of the exact dose administered. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15: 0 to 4 hours postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of dose (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n= 1, 1, 1, 0, 4, 6, 8, 5)Day 15 (n= 0, 1, 1, 1, 4, 3, 7, 2)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^20NA
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^20.307000.14100
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^200.04900
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^2NA0.53600
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^20.298420.58105
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^20.236830.31852
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^20.423940.65344
Ixazomib1.76 mg/m^20.568960.55331

[back to top]

Emax: Maximum Observed Effect for Ixazomib

Emax is the maximum inhibition of 20S proteasome activity in whole blood. (NCT00893464)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours postdose)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of inhibition (Mean)
Day 1 (n= 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 7, 5, 4)Day 15 (n= 0, 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 2)
Ixazomib 0.125 mg/m^25.150NA
Ixazomib 0.25 mg/m^218.50064.300
Ixazomib 0.5 mg/m^233.20019.200
Ixazomib 1.0 mg/m^250.50044.400
Ixazomib 1.4 mg/m^266.33369.800
Ixazomib 1.76 mg/m^272.18674.833
Ixazomib 2.34 mg/m^281.86079.625
Ixazomib 3.11 mg/m^280.20083.650

[back to top] [back to top]

AUC(0-last): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2509.0001010.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^23.38356.533
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^220.700177.667
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2109.000458.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2159.050605.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2251.000808.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2449.0001435.600
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2416.5001915.000
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2410.0002297.200
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2418.175903.846
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2351.000937.857

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^226.60027.200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^22.1202.837
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^210.1908.857
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^222.20031.650
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^229.00056.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^221.100101.100
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^268.16785.420
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2117.933105.450
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^285.600109.660
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^258.90059.871
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^259.34361.800

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

The number of participants with any clinically significant changes in vital signs collected throughout the study that were reported as TEAEs. Measurement of vital signs, included oral temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities Reported as TEAEs

The number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout the study reported as TEAEs. Parameters assessed were hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Blood Creatinine IncreasedBlood Urea IncreasedWhite Blood Cell Count DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedAlanine Aminotransferase IncreasedLiver Function Test IncreasedBlood Calcium IncreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedHaematocrit DecreasedHaemoglobin Decreased
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^21000001000
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20010000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21011000100
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20100000000
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22000110000
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22101000011

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0001.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^21.0001.100
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^21.0001.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^20.7751.275
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20.7750.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^21.0001.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0000.667
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21.0000.832
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20.5251.500
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0001.010
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.6170.583

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death;is life-threatening;requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization;results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;is a congenital anomaly/birth defect;or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. A TEAE is defined as an AE that occurs after administration of first dose of study drug and through 30 days after last dose of study drug or until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^222
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^232
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^232
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^275
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^243
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^263
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22014
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2126

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or minimal response (MR) as assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg /24 h. MR=25-49% reduction in the serum monoclonal paraprotein maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 50-89% reduction in 24-h urinary light chain excretion, which still exceeds 200 mg/24 h, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; for participants with non-secretory myeloma only, 25-49% reduction in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate and on trephine biopsy, if biopsy is performed, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 through Cycle 115 (Up to 80.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR+PRCR+PR+MR
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^23333
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^25050
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^23333
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2510
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2918

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a TEAE of Peripheral Neuropathy

Neurotoxicity was assessed as the number of participants with the TEAE of peripheral neuropathy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Neuropathy PeripheralPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^201
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^200
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^210
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^230
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^230

[back to top]

T1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Elimination Half-life for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2135.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2126.50
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2129.33
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2105.88
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^292.70
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2115.85
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2123.06
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2124.93
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2134.00

[back to top]

λz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^20.005
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20.005
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20.006
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.007
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^20.008
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.006
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.006
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20.006
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.005

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib

MTD was highest dose of Ixazomib, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT was defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days;Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25,000/mm^3) for >7 days;Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc >500 millisecond [msec]);any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >2 weeks; other >=Grade 2 study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Ixazomib (All Groups)2

[back to top]

AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 11
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^256.53
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2177.67

[back to top]

AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2509.001010.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2109.00458.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2159.05605.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2251.00808.50
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2449.001435.60
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2416.501915.00
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2410.002297.20
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2451.64903.85
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2351.00937.86

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio: Day 15 AUC0-168 / Day 1 AUC0-168 for MLN2238

MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Interventionunitless (Mean)
1.68 mg/m^22.64
2.23 mg/m^21.45
2.97 mg/m^22.25
3.95 mg/m^21.19
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)2.25
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)2.19
PI naïve1.97
Carfilzomib2.37

[back to top]

Overall Response to Treatment With Ixazomib Citrate Based on Investigator's Evaluation Over Time

"Responses were based on International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Complete Response (CR)=Negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Partial Response (PR)= reduction in M-Protein ≥50% in serum and ≥90% in 24-hour urine. If M-protein unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference of involved and uninvolved Free Light Chain (FLC). If M-protein and FLC unmeasurable, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required, if baseline bone marrow plasma cell ≥30%. And ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Minimal Response (MR)= 25-49% reduction in serum paraprotein for 6 weeks. 50-89% reduction in 24 hour urinary light chain excretion for 6 weeks. For Non-secretory myeloma patients, 25-49 % reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow and trephine biopsy for a 6 weeks. 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Up to 354 days

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + PRCR + PR + MR
0.24 mg/m^200
0.48 mg/m^200
0.80 mg/m^200
1.20 mg/m^200
1.68 mg/m^200
2.23 mg/m^200
2.97 mg/m^22525
3.95 mg/m^22525
Carfilzomib2525
PI naïve1717
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)918
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)2233

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

"An Adverse Event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.~A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: From the first dose through 30 days after last dose of ixazomib citrate or until the start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 354 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
0.24 mg/m^23
0.48 mg/m^23
0.80 mg/m^22
1.20 mg/m^23
1.68 mg/m^24
2.23 mg/m^23
2.97 mg/m^28
3.95 mg/m^25
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)11
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)10
PI naïve6
Carfilzomib4

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN2238

Tmax: Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time to Cmax. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^21.501.07
0.48 mg/m^21.530.50
0.80 mg/m^21.521.83
1.20 mg/m^21.001.00
1.68 mg/m^21.521.27
2.23 mg/m^21.258.00
2.97 mg/m^21.001.25
3.95 mg/m^21.001.03
Carfilzomib1.421.03
PI naïve1.001.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)2.001.50
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)0.501.00

[back to top]

Neurotoxicity Grading

Neurotoxicity is graded using participant responses to 11 functional questions on a 5-point scale, where 0=Not at all and 4=Very much, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecology Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, Version 4.0(14). Neurotoxicity subscale is a sum of 11 reversed item scores where each original score is transformed as (4 - score). The highest possible score is 44, and a higher score indicates more neurotoxicity. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and End of Study (Up to 354 days)

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=2,3,3,3,4,3,7,4,9,8,6,4)End of Study (n=3,3,2,1,1,3,4,3,8,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^236.0025.00
0.48 mg/m^240.3340.67
0.80 mg/m^242.0038.50
1.20 mg/m^236.0035.00
1.68 mg/m^239.5042.00
2.23 mg/m^236.8036.00
2.97 mg/m^233.1436.00
3.95 mg/m^238.5033.33
Carfilzomib32.0027.33
PI naïve38.0037.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)38.4433.88
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)33.7327.24

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN2238

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^23.0103.64
0.48 mg/m^22.914.64
0.80 mg/m^25.756.89
1.20 mg/m^215.1017.90
1.68 mg/m^213.8317.63
2.23 mg/m^229.059.24
2.97 mg/m^265.46100.55
3.95 mg/m^2123.95134.00
Carfilzomib83.7355.10
PI naïve77.70118.05
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)75.9250.46
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)110.4393.68

[back to top]

AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for MLN2238

AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (tau) (AUC[0-tau]), where tau is the length of the dosing interval - 168 hours in this study). MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0,2,1,3,4,3,5,4,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=0,0,2,0,2,1,2,1,1,4,3,2)
0.24 mg/m^2NANA
0.48 mg/m^2NANA
0.80 mg/m^2NA398.50
1.20 mg/m^2NANA
1.68 mg/m^2258.00663.00
2.23 mg/m^2598.00868.00
2.97 mg/m^21269.673100.00
3.95 mg/m^21371.251460.00
Carfilzomib813.672075.00
PI naïve750.251549.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)1793.333690.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)854.201777.75

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for MLN2238

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Interventionhour (Mean)
0.80 mg/m^2271.00
1.20 mg/m^2190.50
1.68 mg/m^2189.00
2.23 mg/m^2175.00
2.97 mg/m^2246.00
3.95 mg/m^2165.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)186.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)202.33
PI naïve123.90
Carfilzomib108.00

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for MLN2238

Terminal elimination rate constant (λz) is the rate at which drugs are eliminated from the body and the values were used for calculation of T1/2. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Intervention1/hour (Mean)
0.80 mg/m^20.000
1.20 mg/m^20.000
1.68 mg/m^20.000
2.23 mg/m^20.00
2.97 mg/m^20.00
3.95 mg/m^20.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)0.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)0.00
PI naïve0.01
Carfilzomib0.01

[back to top]

TEmax: Time of Occurrence of Emax

(NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
0.24 mg/m^2NA
0.48 mg/m^2NA
0.80 mg/m^2NA
1.20 mg/m^2NA
1.68 mg/m^2NA
2.23 mg/m^2NA
2.97 mg/m^2NA
3.95 mg/m^2NA
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)NA
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)NA
PI naïveNA
CarfilzomibNA

[back to top]

Emax: Maximum Inhibition

A Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition Parameter. There were no subjects in the Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis Set for the 2.23 mg/m^2 cohort, so PD tables do not include that arm. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

InterventionPercentage of inhibition (Mean)
0.24 mg/m^2NA
0.48 mg/m^2NA
0.80 mg/m^2NA
1.20 mg/m^2NA
1.68 mg/m^2NA
2.23 mg/m^2NA
2.97 mg/m^2NA
3.95 mg/m^2NA
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)NA
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)NA
PI naïveNA
CarfilzomibNA

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 2: 1 Year Survival Rate

1-year survival rate is defined as the percentage of participants still alive at year after the first dose of stud drug. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: 1 year after first dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone92
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone92

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response (CR + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD). Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Following Treatment With the Combination Of Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide And Low-Dose Dexamethasone

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) assessed by the investigatory using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or; 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone59
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone62

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the investigator using IMWG criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone88
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone88

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of death + 1 day. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death (up to 787 days)

Interventionparticipants (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD or death. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.98
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Time to Best Response

Time to Best Response was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented documentation of a confirmed response of partial response (PR) or better. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.96
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone3.01

[back to top]

Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD). (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented progressive disease (Up to 787 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Phase 1: AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for Ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 3, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA834.608
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone587.6671083.998
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone923.4841831.324
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNANA

[back to top]

Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA11.999
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.30331.368
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone94.77953.517
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNANA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher AEs, SAEs and Treatment Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 3 or Higher AEsSAEsAEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation
Phase 2 :Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone76408
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75438

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Near Complete Response (nCR), Partial Response (PR) and Minimal Response (MR)

Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR= CR + Normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. nCR=Positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease. Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. MR=25% to 49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50% to 89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12 (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRsCRVGPRnCRPRMR
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone206392676
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2310382656

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: After Cycles 3, 6 and 9 (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
After 3 cyclesAfter 6 cyclesAfter 9 cycles
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone354757
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone374858

[back to top]

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AESAE
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone32
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone33
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone61
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone32

[back to top]

Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib

The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC(0-168) on Day 15 to the AUC(0-168) on Day 1. AUC(0-168) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.849
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.051

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib Administered Weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone

MTD of ixazomib will be determined by assessing adverse events and serious adverse events, clinical laboratory values, neurotoxicity grading, and vital sign measurements. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1: Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.97

[back to top]

Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.0204.165
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.5201.000
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.0601.015
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0.2502.000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Hematologic Response to Treatment Based on Investigators Assessment

The overall hematologic response rate is defined as number of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or very good partial response (VGPR) as assessed by the investigator. Response is determined according to standardized criteria using a central laboratory. CR=serum and urine negative for monoclonal protein by immunofixation; or free light chain ratio normal; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow without clonal dominance. PR=reduction in dFLC > 50%. VGPR= dFLC < 40 mg/L. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Day 22 to 28 in each cycle and end of treatment visit; then every 6 weeks thereafter until disease progression or initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to approximately 12 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg0
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)4
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)3

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg54.0051.26

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Organ Response to Treatment Based on Investigators Assessment

Organ response rate was estimated as the number of participants with documented organ response (ie. Heart or kidney ). Treatment response of amyloid-related organs were identified based on national cancer institute, common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.02 criteria. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: At Cycles 3, 6, 9, and 12; every 6 months thereafter until disease progression or the initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy and at end of treatment (EOT) visit (Up to approximately 12 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg0
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)2
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)2

[back to top]

Ctrough: Plasma Concentration Immediately Prior to Dosing for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg2.15392.9140

[back to top]

Emax: Maximum Observed Percent Inhibition of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionpercentage of inhibition (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg54.1061.09

[back to top]

Organ Disease Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Organ disease PFS, measured as the time from the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of organ disease progression or death. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of organ disease progression or death (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mgNA
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mgNA
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)NA
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Peripheral Neuropathy Reported as a TEAE

Neurotoxicity was assessed as the number of participants with the TEAE of peripheral neuropathy. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug plus 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to approximately 13 months)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNeuropathy peripheral
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg11
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg00
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)10
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)10

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With One Year Hematologic Disease PFS

One-year survival, defined as the patient survival probability at 1 year after the date of first dose of ixazomib. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of hematologic disease progression or death (Up to 1 year)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg83.3
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)80.0
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)21.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to First Hematologic Response

Time to first hematologic response, measured as the time from the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documentation of a hematologic response. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documentation of a hematologic response (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0.79
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)3.45
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)2.11

[back to top]

Time to Hematologic Disease Progression

Time to hematologic progression, measured as the time from the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documented hematologic disease progression. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documented hematologic disease progression (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg14.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mgNA
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)73.0
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)8.3

[back to top]

Time to Organ Disease Progression

Time to organ disease progression, measured as the time from the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documented organ disease progression. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documented organ disease progression (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg11
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)12.85
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)25.15

[back to top]

AUC0-168: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 5.5 mg1725.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as TEAE

The number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout the study reported as TEAEs. Parameters assessed were hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory values were assessed as an AE if that value leads to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or is considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug plus 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to approximately 13 months)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ThrombocytopeniaAnaemiaNeutropeniaHyponatraemiaHypokalaemiaBlood creatinine increasedPlatelet count decreased
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg2201110
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg0000002
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)2011110
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)2201000

[back to top]

Ctrough: Plasma Concentration Immediately Prior to Dosing for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 5.5 mg5.3300

[back to top]

AUC0-168: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Post-dose for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg861.01078.1

[back to top]

Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 5.5 mg0.7500

[back to top]

Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg1.00001.0000

[back to top]

AUE0-168: Area Under Effect Curve of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition From Zero to Concentration at 168 Hours for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhr*percentage of inhibition (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg3333.63943.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. A TEAE is defined as an AE that occurs after administration of first dose of study drug and through 30 days after last dose of study drug or until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug plus 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to approximately 13 months)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg63
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg55
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)105
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)55

[back to top]

Duration of Hematologic Response

Duration of hematologic response, measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a hematologic response to the date of hematologic disease progression. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of a hematologic response to the date of hematologic disease progression (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg12.9
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)69.5
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)19.7

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 5.5 mg92.20

[back to top]

Time to First Organ Response

Time to first organ response, measured as the time from the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documentation of a organ response. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of first documentation of a organ response (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg6.85
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)9.55
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)6.85

[back to top]

Duration of Organ Response

Duration of organ response, measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a organ response to the date of organ disease progression. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of a organ response to the date of organ disease progression (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg4.1
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)20.5
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)18.25

[back to top]

Hematologic Disease Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Hematologic disease PFS, measured as the time from the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of hematologic disease progression or death. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of ixazomib to the date of hematologic disease progression or death (Up to approximately 12 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg14.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg7.2
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Naive)73.0
Dose Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (PI Exposed)8.3

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib

MTD was highest dose of Ixazomib, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 4.03 as: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/mm^3) for >7 days;Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection;Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25,000/mm^3) for >7 days;Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding;platelet count <10,000/mm^3;Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy;Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc >500 msec);any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia;or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue;delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >2 weeks;other >=Grade 2 study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation, considered possibly related to therapy as assessed by Investigator. (NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days)

Interventionmg (Number)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 4.0 mg4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Ixazomib 5.5 mg4

[back to top]

TEmax: Time to Maximum Observed Effect (Emax) of Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition for Ixazomib

(NCT01318902)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 (MTD cohort participants only, 4.0 mg) and Day 15 (all participants enrolled in the study): predose (within 1 hour (hr) before dosing), and postdose at multiple timepoints up to 168 hr

Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg1.00001.0300

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal elimination rate constant, calculated as the negative of the slope of the log-linear regression of the natural logarithm concentration-time curve during the terminal phase. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg0.004
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0.006
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg0.007

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal elimination rate constant, calculated as the negative of the slope of the log-linear regression of the natural logarithm concentration-time curve during the terminal phase. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0.005
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0.006

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal elimination rate constant, calculated as the negative of the slope of the log-linear regression of the natural logarithm concentration-time curve during the terminal phase. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mgNA0.005

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg167.000
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg130.362
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg98.900

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg163.500
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg120.050

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mgNA140.575

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 11
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg1.0201.050
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg0.5178.000

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg1.7500.833
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg1.0001.000
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg1.3020.500

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg1.5601.500
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg1.2821.275
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0.5670.760

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 11
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg319.7141227.143
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg287.0001180.000

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Phase 2)

DOR is defined as time of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better response to first documented PD or start of alternative therapy. DOR was presented for those achieving CR+VGPR+PR. Per IMWG criteria, CR:1)Negative immunofixation on serum+urine, 2)Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, 3)< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR: Serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ 90% or >reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level < 100 mg/ 24-hour. PR:1)≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24-hour. If serum+urine M-protein are unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required. Else, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was ≥30%. In addition, if present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of first documented disease progression for up to 5.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)25.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as percentage of participants with overall response including CR, VGPR, and partial response (PR). Per IMWG criteria, CR:1)Negative immunofixation on serum and urine, 2)Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, 3)< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR: Serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ 90% or >reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level < 100 mg/ 24-hour. PR:1)≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24-hour. If serum+urine M-protein are unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required. If serum+urine M-protein are unmeasurable and serum free light assay is also unmeasurable, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was ≥30%. In addition, if present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Day 1 of every other cycle from Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days) up to 61 cycles, at end of treatment (Up to 5.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg86
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg67
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg100
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg65
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg60
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg40
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg67
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg50

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Phase 2)

Overall Survival is the time in months from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From date of enrollment to date of death, approximately 5.5 years (Approximate median follow-up: 43.6 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)NA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (Phase 2)

Progression Free Survival is defined as time in months from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression per investigator assessment or up to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per IMWG criteria, progressive disease requires any 1 or more of following: Increase of ≥25% from nadir in serum M-component and/or (absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL), urine M-component and/or (absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hour. Participants without measurable serum+urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: absolute % must be ≥10%. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From the date of enrollment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause for up to 5.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)18.4

[back to top]

Time to First Response (Phase 2)

Response is defined as CR, VGPR and PR. Per IMWG criteria, CR:1)Negative immunofixation on serum+urine, 2)Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, 3)< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR: Serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ 90% or >reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level < 100 mg/ 24-hour. PR:1)≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24-hour. If serum+urine M-protein are unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required. Else, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was ≥30%. In addition, if present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From the date of enrollment to the date of the first documented response for up to 5.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)1.9

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) (Phase 2)

TTP is defined as time from date of enrollment to date of first documented disease progression (PD). Per IMWG criteria, progressive disease requires any 1 or more of following: Increase of ≥25% from nadir in serum M-component and/or (absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL), urine M-component and/or (absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hour. Participants without measurable serum+urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: absolute % must be ≥10%. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From the date of enrollment to the date of the first documented disease progression for up to 5.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)22.1

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate (Phase 2)

VGPR or better response rate is defined as percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR). Per International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG), CR: 1) Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, 2) Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and 3) < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Day 1 of every other cycle from Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days) until death (Up to 5.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg (RP2D)48

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg450.000705.667
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg806.8241610.500
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg1612.2501680.000

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg662.8331527.800
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg1037.5002680.000
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg934.8002435.000

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 11
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg26.79169.214
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg39.30022.000

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg22.95030.267
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg53.27885.636
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg104.225285.000

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib (Phase 1)

(NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg55.36759.560
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg50.875109.000
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg72.080146.400

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy for up to 5.6 years

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
During Entire Study Any Adverse EventGrade 3 or Higher Adverse EventSerious Adverse EventAdverse Event With Any Study Drug DiscontinuationAdverse Event With Any Study Drug Reduction
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg77204
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg44402
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg33301
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg262112813
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg55323
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg65423
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg44212
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg65124

[back to top]

Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)

Accumulation ratio for AUCtau (Rac) was calculated as area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 14 divided by area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 1. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 11
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.0 mg4.019
Arm A: Ixazomib 3.7 mg4.120

[back to top]

Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)

Accumulation ratio for AUCtau (Rac) was calculated as area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 14 divided by area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 1. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 15
Arm B: Ixazomib 3.0 mg1.700
Arm B: Ixazomib 4.0 mg2.288
Arm B: Ixazomib 5.5 mg1.970

[back to top]

Observed Accumulation Ratio for AUCtau (Rac) (Phase 1)

Accumulation ratio for AUCtau (Rac) was calculated as area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 14 divided by area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) on Day 1. (NCT01335685)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 and at multiple timepoints (up to 8 hours) on Day 11 for Arm A, Day 15 for Arm B and Day 29 for Arms C and D

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 29
Arm C: Ixazomib 3.0 mg2.632
Arm C: Ixazomib 4.0 mg2.560
Arm D: Ixazomib 4.0 mg2.540

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the time of death plus 1 day. For participants who did not die, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Overall Survival was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 3 mgNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 1

The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants surviving at Year 1. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: 1 year after the first dose of study treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 3 mg94

[back to top]

Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax of ixazomib after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 11
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg1.0351.030
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg1.0000.984

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adverse EventSerious Adverse Event
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg10071
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg10029

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood creatinine increasedShift to the leftPlatelet count decreasedBlood bicarbonate decreasedAnaemiaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaEosinophiliaHypokalaemiaHyperkalaemiaHyperglycaemiaHyponatraemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyperchloraemiaIron deficiency anaemia
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg00201111101140011
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg32010000110001200

[back to top]

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PyrexiaBradycardiaOrthostatic hypotensionHypotension
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg1101
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg3011

[back to top]

Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg33.51558.674
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg46.94651.832

[back to top]

Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg315.4501105.44
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg284.5761023.52

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD + 1 day. Participants that did not experience PD will be censored at the last response assessment that is SD or better. PD: >=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants that received Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) or an alternate cancer therapy were also be censored at the last response assessment that is, SD or better prior to initiation of therapy. Participants without response assessment will be censored at the date of first dose. TTP was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 3 mg29.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first plus 1. PD: >=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved,uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants who received ASCT or an alternate anticancer therapy were censored at the last response assessment that was SD or better before initiation of therapy. Participants without a response assessment were censored at the date of first dose. PFS was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 3 mg29.7

[back to top]

Phase 2: Time to Response

Time to first response is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response (PR or better) in a participant who responded + 1 day. PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by 90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg0.72

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

VGPR as per IMWG criteria is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg37

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg14

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg22

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response to the date of first documented PD. PD is defined as >=25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcaemia development. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg29.0

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)

PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by 90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg65

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)

Overall response is defined as CR, VGPR or PR based on IMWG Response Criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine M-protein level <100 mg/24h. Partial response (PR) is a minimum of 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of other nodes. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg94

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)

nCR as per IMWG criteria is positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; appearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg10

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)

MR as per IMWG criteria is 25%-49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50%-89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg6

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg74

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level >=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg65

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)

CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg29

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events

A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg46

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Partial response(PR):>=50% reduction of serum M-protein,urinary M-protein by >=90%/to <200 mg/24 hr reduction.Near CR(nCR):positive immunofixation of serum/urine;soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance;<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level >=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg92

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib

The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-72) on Day 11 to the AUC (0-72) on Day 1. AUC (0-72) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg3.785
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg3.967

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16

CR as per IMWG criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR were applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein; Urine M-protein; Serum FLC assay. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycles 4, 8, and 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
After 4 cyclesAfter 8 cyclesAfter 16 cycles
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg496492

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for >7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >14 days; <=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other >=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation. (NCT01383928)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase 1: All Participants3.7

[back to top]

AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Arm 1:Days 1, 15 and Arm 5:Day 6 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 264 hrs)post-dose;Arm 2, 3:Days 1,15 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 216 hrs)post-dose;Arm 4:Day 8 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 168 hrs)post-dose

Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)] (Geometric Mean)
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg551.985
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg1148.778
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A1284.079
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule B1334.659
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted1465.979
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fed998.698
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg231.527
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg613.112

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Arm 1:Days 1, 15 and Arm 5:Day 6 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 264 hours[hrs])post-dose;Arm 2, 3:Days 1,15 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 216 hrs)post-dose;Arm 4:Day 8 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 168 hrs)post-dose

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg38.975
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg39.250
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A61.866
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule B71.949
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted77.001
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fed22.752
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg25.706
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg37.245

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities

(NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Arm 1 and 5: Cycle 19 Day 45; Arm 2: Cycle 7 Day 45; Arm 3: Cycle 22 Day 45; Arm 4: Cycle 25 Day 45

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg0
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A or B0
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted or Fed0
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg0
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg0

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Arm 1:Days 1, 15 and Arm 5:Day 6 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 264 hrs)post-dose;Arm 2, 3:Days 1,15 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 216 hrs)post-dose;Arm 4:Day 8 pre-dose and at multiple time points(up to 168 hrs)post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg1.090
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg1.500
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A1.290
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule B1.250
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted1.020
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fed4.000
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg1.450
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Arm 1 and 5: Cycle 19 Day 45; Arm 2: Cycle 7 Day 45; Arm 3: Cycle 22 Day 45; Arm 4: Cycle 25 Day 45)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsSAEs
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg2912
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A or B205
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted or Fed2412
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg183
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg2110

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

Best overall response for a participant is best observed post-baseline disease response as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1: Complete response (CR) was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than (<) 10 millimeter [mm]). No new lesions. Partial response (PR) was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. Stable disease (SD) was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, Progressive Disease (PD). An increase of >=20% from the nadir (or baseline, if it represents the point at which the sum of target disease was lowest) represents PD. (NCT01454076)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (approximately 1.9 years)

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPD
Arm 1: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Ketoconazole 400 mg006338
Arm 2: Ixazomib 4 mg Capsule A or B005050
Arm 3: Ixazomib 4 mg Fasted or Fed063559
Arm 4: Ixazomib 4 mg + Rifampin 600 mg005347
Arm 5: Ixazomib 2.5 mg + Clarithromycin 500 mg015347

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response

"Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now [current pain]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst)." (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineEOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone345145
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone351153

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0000000000000

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone4.7936.315.66.832.47.122.482.412.422.572.712.372.512.82

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR [including sCR] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone26.0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone21.7

[back to top]

OS in High-Risk Participants

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone46.9
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone78.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone71.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism

Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone80.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone53.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone51.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17). (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone42.2
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC

Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone48.1
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone39.0

[back to top]

PFS in High-Risk Participants

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone18.7
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone9.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.7

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.4
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone17.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTPain: BaselinePain: EOTNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone58.4-6.070.0-4.768.4-8.675.1-2.181.9-7.677.9-6.938.46.038.02.75.03.421.25.727.40.916.94.712.2-1.36.317.216.70.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentGlobal Health Index: Last Follow-upPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Last Follow-upRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Last Follow-upEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Last Follow-upCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Last Follow-upSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Last Follow-upFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTFatigue: Last Follow-upPain: BaselinePain: EOTPain: Last Follow-upNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTNausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-upDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Last Follow-upInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTInsomnia: Last Follow-upAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Last Follow-upConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTConstipation: Last Follow-upDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Last Follow-upFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone56.4-6.016.767.3-6.20.064.4-8.6-16.775.3-6.1-25.081.6-5.8-50.075.3-7.90.039.56.722.238.53.80.06.00.633.323.72.30.030.5-0.533.315.36.50.013.52.233.38.110.80.018.61.3-33.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-upBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTBody Image: Last Follow-upFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOTFuture Perspective: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.41-2.5817.974.4337.0479.48-5.38-33.360.26-2.75-11.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTDisease Symptoms: Last Follow-upSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.71-2.351.1117.234.5278.00-0.2756.992.76

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone359205
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone357201

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone57.57

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the length of time between the date of first documented response (PR, VGPR, or CR) and the date of first documented progressive disease (PD). According to IMWG criteria: CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From date of documentation of a confirmed response to date of progressive disease, (approximately 20 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone12.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined as any of the following AEs that were considered by investigator to be possibly related to therapy: 1. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 7 consecutive days; 2. Grade 3 neutropenia with fever and/or infection; 3. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at least 7 consecutive days; 4. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; 5. Platelet count <10,000/mm^3; 6. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or ≥Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; 7. Grade 3 or greater nausea and / or emesis despite the use of optimal anti-emetic prophylaxis; 8. Grade 3 or greater diarrhea that occurred despite maximal supportive therapy; 9. Any other Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia, <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; 10. A delay of >2 weeks in the subsequent cycle of treatment; 11. Other combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities ≥Grade 2 that, in the opinion of the investigator, required discontinuation of study drug. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (up to Day 28)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Best Response Category

Percentage of participants who achieve or maintain any best response category during the treatment period were reported. Best response includes complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR). Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1, Day 1 to Cycle 3, Day 1 until disease progression (approximately 20 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone53.5

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone1.5

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone2.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was a medically important event. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone4318

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Adverse Events of ≥Grade 3 Intensity

Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were defined as any test results which were observed beyond the clinically acceptable limits as per the discretion of investigator. Clinical laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis tests. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedAspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedBlood Creatinine IncreasedHaemoglobin DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedAnaemiaFebrile NeutropeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaHyperglycaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHypophosphataemia
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone21112461128135112

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Reported as Adverse Events

The number of participants who meet markedly abnormal criteria for vital signs, included diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature, respiratory rate, and body weight. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1 or 2 HypertensionGrade 2 Hypotension
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone41

[back to top]

AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone685.9

[back to top]

AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone1746.0

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone37.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

SF-36 Version 2 is a multipurpose, participant completed, short-form health survey with 36 questions that consists of an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. Physical component summary (PCS) is mostly contributed by physical function (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and general health (GH). Mental component summary (MCS) is mostly contributed by mental health (MH), role emotional (RE), social function (SF), and vitality (VT). Each component on the SF-36 item health survey is scored from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Total score ranges from 0-100, where higher scores are associated with less disability and better quality of life. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide10.3

[back to top]

Duration of Hematologic Response

Duration of hematologic response (DOR) was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a hematologic response to the date of first documented hematologic disease progression as determined by the investigator. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From time of first documented response to disease progression (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + DexamethasoneNA
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide21.19

[back to top]

EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analogue Scale Score

The EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) records the participant's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter vertical VAS that ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Baseline is defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the start of study drug administration. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: At Week 28 of the OS follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide23.0

[back to top]

Hematologic Disease Progression Free Survival

Hematologic disease PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of hematologic PD according to central laboratory results and ISA criteria as evaluated by an adjudication committee, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone29.50
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide27.73

[back to top]

Number of Hospitalizations

A hospitalization was defined as at least one overnight stay in an intensive care unit and/or non-intensive care unit. If a single hospitalization included both an intensive care unit stay and a non-intensive care unit stay, the hospitalization was counted only once (as an intensive care unit stay). The mean number of hospitalizations is reported in this outcome measure. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionhospitalizations (Mean)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone1.8
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

SF-36 Version 2 is a multipurpose, participant completed, short-form health survey with 36 questions that consists of an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. Physical component summary (PCS) is mostly contributed by physical function (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and general health (GH). Mental component summary (MCS) is mostly contributed by mental health (MH), role emotional (RE), social function (SF), and vitality (VT). Each component on the SF-36 item health survey is scored from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Total score ranges from 0-100, where higher scores are associated with less disability and better quality of life. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide2.0

[back to top]

2-Year Vital Organ (Heart or Kidney) Deterioration and Mortality Rate

Cardiac (Heart) deterioration was defined as the need for hospitalization for heart failure. Kidney deterioration was defined as progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with the need for maintenance dialysis or renal transplantation. Vital organ deterioration was evaluated by an adjudication committee. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest decimal. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone47
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide54

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib

As prespecified in the protocol, data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for ixazomib arm group only. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: 1, 4 hours postdose, Day 14: 144 hours postdose; Cycle 2, Day 1: predose, Day 14: 144 hours postdose; Cycles 3 to 10, Day 1: predose (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1 Hour Post-doseCycle 1 Day 14: 4 Hours Post-doseCycle 1 Day 14: 144 Hours Post-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 14: 144 Hours Post-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1 Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 1 Pre-doseCycle 6 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 8 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 9 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1: Pre-dose
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone16.51810.6523.8752.0004.7262.1872.2762.2642.2352.2992.0382.1432.232

[back to top]

Vital Organ Progression Free Survival

Vital organ PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression of vital organ (heart or kidney) according to central laboratory results and ISA criteria as evaluated by an adjudication committee, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone15.77
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide11.01

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Score

The European Quality of Life (EuroQOL) 5-Dimensional (EQ-5D) is a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 possible choices: no problems to extreme problems. Higher scores=worsening of the quality of life. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: At Week 28 of the OS follow-up

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mobility: No Problems in Walking AboutMobility: Some Problem in Walking AboutMobility: Confined to BedSelf-Care: No Problems With Self- CareSelf-Care: Some Problems Washing or DressingSelf-Care: Unable to Wash or DressUsual Activities: No Problems With Performing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Some Problem With Performing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Unable to Performing Usual ActivitiesPain/Discomfort: No Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Moderate Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Extreme Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: Not Anxious or DepressedAnxiety/Depression: Moderately Anxious or DepressedAnxiety/Depression: Extremely Anxious or Depressed
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone000000000000000
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide010010010010001

[back to top]

Time to Vital Organ (Heart or Kidney) Deterioration and Mortality Rate

Time to vital organ deterioration or death was assessed by the investigator and defined as the time from randomization to vital organ (heart or kidney) deterioration or death, whichever occurs first. Cardiac deterioration is defined as the need for hospitalization for heart failure. Kidney deterioration is defined as progression to ESRD with the need for maintenance dialysis or renal transplantation. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From randomization to time of vital organ deterioration or death (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone38.67
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide26.09

[back to top]

Time To Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as: 1) death due to any cause; 2) hematologic progression or major organ progression according to central laboratory results and ISA criteria as evaluated by the investigator; 3) clinically morbid organ disease requiring additional therapy; or 4) withdrawn for any reason. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone10.32
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide5.32

[back to top]

Time To Subsequent Anticancer Treatment

Time to subsequent anticancer therapy was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of subsequent anticancer therapy. Participants without subsequent anticancer therapy were censored at the date of death or last known to be alive. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until subsequent anticancer treatment (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone26.48
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide12.45

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of hematologic disease progression, or organ (cardiac or renal) progression, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first according to central laboratory results and ISA criteria as evaluated by the investigator. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone11.86
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide7.62

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response

Overall hematologic response was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR) based on central laboratory results and the 2010 International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) Consensus Criteria as assessed by an adjudication committee. CR: Complete disappearance of M-protein from serum and urine on immunofixation, and normalization of free light chain (FLC) ratio. VGPR: differential free light chain (difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; dFLC) < 40 mg/L. PR: ≥50% reduction in dFLC. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest decimal. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone53
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan58
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide30
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Thalidomide50
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Lenalidomide51

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response

Complete hematologic response was defined as the percentage of participants with CR based on central laboratory results and the 2010 ISA Consensus Criteria as assessed by the investigator. CR: Complete disappearance of M-protein from serum and urine on immunofixation, and normalization of FLC ratio. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest decimal. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone30
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Vital Organ (Cardiac and/or Kidney) Response

Vital organ (heart and kidney) response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved vital organ response according to central laboratory results and ISA criteria as evaluated by an adjudication committee. A vital organ response was defined as response of 1 or 2 of the involved vital organs with no change from Baseline in the rest of involved vital organs. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest decimal. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone19
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide12

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until discontinuation of study drug due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurs first (up to 115 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone69.55
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide43.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or medically important event. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after administration of the last dose of study drug (up to 115 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Ixazomib + Dexamethasone44
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan11
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide2
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Thalidomide0
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Lenalidomide17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Amyloidosis Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

The amyloidosis symptom scale questionnaire is a participant completed questionnaire that evaluates symptom severity of 3 symptoms: Swelling, Shortness of Breath and Dizziness, each rated on an 11-point scale where: 0=no symptoms to 10=very severe symptoms. Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Total Score is the sum of all responses from the amyloidosis symptom scale ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide-16.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) Score at Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

The FACT/GOG-Ntx is a participant completed questionnaire that comprises 11 individual items evaluating symptoms of neurotoxicity on a 5-point scale where: 0=not at all (best) to 4=very much for a total possible score of 0 to 44. Symptom scores are inverted so that higher scores of FACT/GOG-Ntx indicate higher quality of life or functioning. As prespecified in the protocol, data was planned to be collected and analyzed in a combined way for non-ixazomib arm groups in this outcome measure. (NCT01659658)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 of the PFS Follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm B: Dexamethasone + Melphalan/Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Lenalidomide0.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse Event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT01830816)
Timeframe: From signing of first dose of study drug up to the 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately up to 885 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib19
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib14
End-stage Renal Disease: Ixazomib6

[back to top]

Unbound Cmax: Unbound Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01830816)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib0.300
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib0.478
End-stage Renal Disease: Ixazomib0.213

[back to top]

Unbound AUClast: Unbound Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01830816)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib6.637
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib9.249
End-stage Renal Disease: Ixazomib8.925

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01830816)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib1.0400
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib1.0000
End-stage Renal Disease: Ixazomib1.2500

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Participants

Overall response rate defined as percentage of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma participants who achieved partial response (PR), complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR) according to International Myeloma Working Group Criteria. PR=>50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >90% or <200 mg/24 h. If serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, >50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels in place of M-protein criteria. If serum and urine M-protein and serum free light assay are not measurable, >50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell >0%; CR=negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR=serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or > 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h. (NCT01830816)
Timeframe: Day 1 of every other cycle from cycle 1 (each cycle of 28 days) up to progression of disease (approximately up to 855 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib29
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib18
End-stage Renal Disease: Ixazomib0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in RRMM Participants

DOR was defined as time from date of first documentation of a PR or better to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) for responders. Increase of >25% from lowest response value in any one or more of following: Serum M-component and/or (absolute increase must be >0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >200 mg/24 h); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels and the absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL; Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; absolute percentage must be > 5%; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcaemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Responders without PD were censored at the date of the last response assessment that was stable disease (SD) or better. (NCT01830816)
Timeframe: Day 1 of every other cycle from cycle 1 (each cycle of 28 days) up to progression of disease (approximately up to 855 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Normal Renal Function: Ixazomib134
Severe Renal Impairment: Ixazomib225

[back to top]

Pain Response Rate as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) and Analgesic Use

Pain response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of at least a 30% reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic use for 2 consecutive measurements > 28 days apart, were reported. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex51.3
Ixazomib + LenDex50.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR + partial response (PR) + very good partial response (VGPR) (including sCR) or better relative to the ITT population during treatment period. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % PC's in bone marrow. PR was defined as ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% along with ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR was defined as ≥90% in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24. sCR is defined as stringent complete response. Percentages are rounded off to nearest whole numbers. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex80
Ixazomib + LenDex82

[back to top]

OS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. High risk category includes t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17) abnormalities. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex43.1
Ixazomib + LenDex39.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of first documented progression (PD) for responders, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex37.5
Ixazomib + LenDex50.6

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR assessed by an IRC relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population during the treatment period. Percentage of participants with CR, as assessed by IMWG disease assessment criteria were reported. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % plasma cells (PC's) in bone marrow. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex14
Ixazomib + LenDex26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MRD-Negative Status as Assessed by Flow Cytometry

The absence of minimal residual disease (MRD negativity) was tested in all participants who achieve a CR and maintained it until Cycle 18, using bone marrow aspirates. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 18 (cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex50
Ixazomib + LenDex59

[back to top] [back to top]

PFS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease based on central laboratory results and IMWG criteria as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex17.5
Ixazomib + LenDex22.4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria whichever occurs first. PD required one of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute % must be >10%; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 79 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex21.8
Ixazomib + LenDex35.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)191125
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)163119
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)189119
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)160105

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)-2

PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documentation of disease progression on the subsequent line of anticancer therapy, as assessed by the investigator in accordance with IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex52.2
Ixazomib + LenDex63.2

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was assessed as the time from randomization to the date of initial progression classification. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by 2 consecutive evaluations (To qualify as progression, the participant must have a BPI-SF worst pain score > 4 during pain progression): 1) a ≥ 2 point and 30% increase from Baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or 2) a 25% or more increase in analgesic use from Baseline without a decrease in BPI-SF worst pain score from Baseline. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex47.1
Ixazomib + LenDexNA

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex26.8
Ixazomib + LenDex45.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Serum Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Based on Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The laboratory values assessment included serum chemistry and hematology. The Serum chemistry assessment included blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, bilirubin (total), urate, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphate, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide (CO2), magnesium, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Hematology assessment included hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet (count), leukocytes with differential neutrophils (ANC). Participants with abnormal serum chemistry laboratory values reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of any agent in the study drug regimen and through 30 days after the last dose of any agent in the study drug regimen. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypokalaemiaBlood creatinine increasedHypophosphataemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHyperglycaemiaHypocalcaemiaHyperkalaemiaAlanine aminotransferase increasedIron deficiencyHypercalcaemiaCreatinine renal clearance decreasedHypoalbuminaemiaAspartate aminotransferase increasedHyperuricaemiaAnaemiaThrombocytopeniaNeutropeniaNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedLymphopeniaFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaInternational normalised ratio increasedPancytopeniaIron deficiency anaemiaWhite blood cell count decreasedLymphocyte count decreased
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)3916915764310754352582439181542242420
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)336961076711212025334155677643112
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)3312311816123421713152144813422401133
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)1692874133126251257153611605312151

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PR or better, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex1.87
Ixazomib + LenDex1.02

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQOL Measured by EORTC-QLQ-MY20 Scale

EORTC QLQ-MY20 was a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. The scale has 20 questions. Subscale and individual items include future perspective items 18-20, body image item 17, disease symptoms items 1-6, side effects of treatment items 7-16. Raw scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher score is better quality of life. Positive change indicates improvement. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 9 years

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: End of TreatmentSide-Effects: BaselineSide-Effects: End of TreatmentBody Image: BaselineBody Image: End of TreatmentFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: End of Treatment
Ixazomib + LenDex29.2-5.317.63.381.2-2.355.06.0
Placebo + LenDex30.3-3.118.01.781.7-7.857.34.4

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose at multiple timepoints up to 4 hours; Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 14, Cycles 2-3 Day 1 and Day 14, Cycles 4-11 Day 1 (Each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1 Hour Post-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 4 Hours Post-doseCycle 1 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 6 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 8 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 9 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 11 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 12 Day 1: Pre-dose
Ixazomib44.74516.2537.8672.6648.5212.7638.4903.2843.5942.6032.5982.5392.5932.5362.6672.686

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis are censored at the date last known to be alive. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDexNA
Ixazomib + LenDexNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline to Worst Value in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale score ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated normal activity and 5 indicated death. The data is reported for those categories where at least 1 participant had worst post-baseline value for each ECOG score. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 0Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 0Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 4Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 4
Ixazomib + LenDex2352231011045794835113
Placebo + LenDex235720219672186122872

[back to top] [back to top]

Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide (Phase I)

Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days

Interventionmg/m² weekly (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)400

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, or Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort B)

The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)63

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I/II, Cohort ANA
Phase II, Cohort BNA

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone (Phase I)

Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days

Interventionmg weekly (Number)
MTD of ixazomibMTD of dexamethasone
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)440

[back to top]

Survival Time

The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I/II, Cohort ANA
Phase II, Cohort BNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Complete Response or Very Good Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort A)

The percentage of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)35

[back to top]

Optimal Dose of MLN9708

This measure will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at which no more than 1 Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) is observed. The starting dose of MLN9708 will be 2.3 mg orally on days 1, 8 and 15. If no DLT is seen in the first 3 patients, the dose will be increased to 3 mg and then to 4 mg orally on days 1, 8 and 15 in a classic 3 +3 phase I design. We will not attempt to increase the dose beyond 4 mg orally which, if achieved with acceptable toxicity, would be accepted as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). 0 of 3 DLTs would allow escalation to the next dose level. 1 of 3 DLTs will require expanding to six patients; 1 of 6 DLTs will allow escalation again. 2 DLTs will require dose de-escalation. (NCT01887587)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionmg (Number)
Modified VXLD Plus MLN97082.3

[back to top]

Adverse Events.

Safety, tolerability will be assessed by counting the number of participants experiencing adverse events at 8 weeks post treatment. (NCT01887587)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 days post treatment; approximately 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
(Modified VXLD) Plus MLN97085

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Values

The number of participants with any markedly abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout study. (NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 15 for each treatment cycle (28 days treatment cycle for up to a maximum of 12 cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)0
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)0
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)0

[back to top]

Unbound Cmax: Unbound Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)0.50893
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)0.37245
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)0.23176

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Day 45 for each treatment cycle for up to a maximum of 12 cycles [28 days treatment cycles])

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAESAE
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)1510
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)136
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)2015

[back to top]

Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)0.950
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)1.500
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)1.205

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature (oral or tympanic measurement), sitting blood pressure (after the participant has rested for at least 5 minutes), and pulse (bpm). (NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 15 for each treatment cycle (28 days treatment cycle for up to a maximum of 12 cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)0
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)0
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)0

[back to top]

Unbound AUC(0-last): Unbound Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01912222)
Timeframe: Part A, Day 1: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionnanogram*hours per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Normal Hepatic Function (Ixazomib 4 mg)9.6476
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 2.3 mg)7.3292
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Ixazomib 1.5 mg)4.4383

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator using the international Working Group criteria for participants CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesions. (NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 15 Cycle 29 (approximately up to Day 802) or until PD or the start of alternate therapies

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRStable Disease (SD)PD
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 4 mg0012
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 5.3 mg0023
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 7.0 mg0023
Phase 2: PSMB1 Negative0001
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive0147

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

The DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a response to the date of first documented PD. Responders without documentation of PD will be censored at the date of last response assessment. DOR was categorized as CR+PR and CR. (NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Time from the date of first documentation of a response to the date of first documented PD (approximately up to Day 802)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive0.0328542094

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants With Response Rates in PSMB1 Positive and PSMB1 Negative

(NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Baseline up to occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or discontinuation of study due to any other reasons (approximately up to Day 802)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive12
Phase 2: PSMB1 Negative1

[back to top]

Phase 2: Rate of Disease Control

Rate of disease control is defined as percentage of participants who achieved a SD or better for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 months. (NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Baseline or until occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or discontinuation of study due to any other reasons (approximately up to Day 805)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive16.7
Phase 2: PSMB1 NegativeNA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented PD or death. Participants without documentation of PD will be censored at the date of last response assessment that is SD or better. Participants without response assessment will be censored at the date of first dose. (NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented PD or death (approximately up to Day 802)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lead-in Dose Finding: Ixazomib 5.3 mg (RP2D)1.9
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive2.4
Phase 2: PSMB1 NegativeNA

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

TTR is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a PR or better response in a participant who responded. (NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented PR or better response or death (approximately up to Day 802)

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive560

[back to top]

Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

(NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

,,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 4 mg1265.00002440.0000
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 5.3 mg1030.14292007.0000
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 7.0 mg1680.33333120.0000

[back to top]

Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

,,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 4 mg141.3333124.2667
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 5.3 mg103.4717144.0667
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 7.0 mg121.1167152.0667

[back to top]

Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

,,
Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 4 mg1.00001.0000
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 5.3 mg1.00000.7500
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 7.0 mg1.05001.0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01939899)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to Day 832)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAESAE
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 4 mg31
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 5.3 mg73
Lead-in Dose Finding Phase: Ixazomib 7.0 mg64
Phase 2: PSMB1 Negative11
Phase 2: PSMB1 Positive114

[back to top]

Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Radioactivity in Plasma

"The plasma samples were pooled for participants over 816 hrs post-dose, and data was analysed using the Hamilton method time-proportional pooling, and therefore the data is reported as percent of total radioactivity in plasma with measure type as number and measure dispersion as Not applicable, NA." (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 816 hrs) post-dose

Interventionpercent of total radioactivity in plasma (Number)
P4, ixazomibP2, ML00701258P3, ML00701201P6, ML00749506P7, ML00752034
Ixazomib54.27.9118.910.63.20

[back to top]

Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Dose Administered in Urine

"The 35-day post-dose data is extrapolated from the average of four participant data from 0-168-hr pooled urine. The data is therefore reported as percentage of dose with measure type as number and measure dispersion as NA." (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionpercentage of dose (Number)
U9, ixazomibU1U2U3U4U5, ML00701258U6, ML00701201U7U8U10, ML00751996U11, ML00749506U12, ML00752034U13
Ixazomib1.300.3910.9261.611.332.7230.22.750.6955.931.280.0690.974

[back to top]

Ixazomib and Metabolites as Percent of Total Dose Administered in Feces

"The 35-day post-dose data is extrapolated from the average of four participant data from 0-168-hr pooled feces. The data is therefore reported as percentage of dose with measure type as number and measure dispersion as NA." (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionpercentage of dose (Number)
FH6, ixazomibFH1FH2FH3, ML00701258FH4, ML00701201FH5FH7, ML00752034FH8FH9
Ixazomib13.80.9000.1110.6200.9011.141.580.5020.112

[back to top]

Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Whole Blood Concentration (Cmax) for TRA

Time to reach the maximum observed whole blood concentration (Cmax) for TRA, equal to time (hours) to Cmax for TRA after administration, obtained directly from the whole blood TRA concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionhr (Median)
Ixazomib0.6000

[back to top]

Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax of ixazomib after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 14) post-dose

Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Ixazomib0.5000

[back to top]

Part A: Renal Clearance of Ixazomib

Renal clearance is the volume of plasma from which ixazomib is completely removed by the kidney in a given amount of time, calculated as the amount of ixazomib excreted in the urine divided by the area under the plasma ixazomib concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 14) post-dose

Interventionliter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib0.1191

[back to top]

Part A: Cumulative Percentage of the Total Radioactivity Dose Excreted in Urine

Percentage of the TRA dose excreted in urine from Day 1 to Day 35 of Part A. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionpercentage of dose (Mean)
Ixazomib62.06

[back to top]

Part A: Tmax: Time to Reach the Cmax for TRA

Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for TRA, equal to time (hours) to Cmax for TRA after administration, obtained directly from the plasma TRA concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionhr (Median)
Ixazomib0.5000

[back to top]

Part A: Cumulative Percentage of the Total Radioactivity Dose Excreted in Feces

Percentage of the TRA dose excreted in feces from Day 1 to Day 35 of Part A (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionpercentage of dose (Mean)
Ixazomib21.80

[back to top]

Part A: Cumulative Percentage of Ixazomib Dose Recovered in the Urine

Percentage of the ixazomib dose excreted unchanged in the urine from 0 to 168 hrs post-dose. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A from 0 to pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hrs) post-dose

Interventionpercentage of dose (Mean)
Ixazomib3.226

[back to top]

Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TRA

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of TRA is the peak plasma concentration of TRA, obtained directly from the plasma TRA concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionnanogram-equivalent per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib78.80

[back to top]

Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 14) post-dose

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib89.06

[back to top]

Part A: AUC(0-816): Area Under the Whole Blood Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 816 Hrs Post-dose for TRA

AUC(0-816) is a measure of the area under the whole blood concentration time-curve from time zero to 816 hrs post-dose for TRA. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 816 hrs) post-dose

Interventionnanogram-equivalent* hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib29200

[back to top]

Part A: AUC(0-816): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 816 Hrs Post-dose for TRA

AUC(0-816) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 816 hrs post-dose for TRA. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 816 hrs) post-dose

Interventionnanogram-equivalent*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib2981

[back to top]

Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Whole Blood Concentration of TRA

Maximum observed whole blood concentration (Cmax) of a TRA is the peak whole blood concentration of TRA, obtained directly from the whole blood TRA concentration-time curve. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to Day 35) post-dose

Interventionnanogram-equivalent per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib181.6

[back to top]

Part A: AUC(0-312): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 312 Hrs Post-dose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-312) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 312 hrs post-dose for ixazomib. (NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Part A pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 312 hrs) post-dose

Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Ixazomib1181

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01953783)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 5 Day 45

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib71

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-registration (at crossover)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)5.6

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).436
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).632

[back to top]

Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionproportion of partcipants (Number)
Overall Response RateClinical Benefit RateDisease Control Rate
Arm I(Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).231.269.962

[back to top]

Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II)

Pre-treatment patient-report of fatigue and overall quality of life (based on a 10-point Likert scale). A higher number indicates a better quality of life where 10 is the best outcome and 0 is the worst. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
High QoL(7-10)Medium or Low QoL (0-7)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)2116
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)2711

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)

progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for disease progression is met. If a patient initiates another anti-cancer treatment prior to disease progression, they will be censored at the date of initiation of this treatment. Patients will be randomized to treatment using the Pocock-Simon algorithm balancing the distribution of the following stratification factors between the two treatment arms: 1) ISS 1-2 disease vs. ISS 3 disease (current ISS stage based off screening beta 2 microglobulin and albumin) 2) High risk cytogenetics features: yes vs. no High risk cytogenetics features include: del(1p), gain of 1q, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14; 20), del(17p) 3) Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor: yes vs. no (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)228
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)619

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II)

Overall survival was analyzed from the time of registration to the date of death or last known date living. Due to median OS time not being reached due to lack of deaths at the time of this report by either arm, the 2 year OS rate has been reported. This analysis censors living patients at 2 years. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of patients alive (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).795
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).784

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)

For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined by the following adverse events at least possibly related to study therapy: Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Alopecia is not expected but would not be considered a DLT. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be adequately managed with optimal supportive care. Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be controlled with appropriate therapy Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 4 lymphopenia is expected with this regimen and will not be construed as a DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days despite appropriate supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days or is associated with greater then or equal to grade 3 bleeding event (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Phase 1 Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level 20
Phase 1 Dose Level 31
Phase 1 Dose Level 41

[back to top]

Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II)

The count of paitents that experenced an adverse event is reported in this section. A full table of these events is reported in the adverse event section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 92 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)22
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) + Crossover Patients From Arm I33
Phase 1 Dose Level 12
Phase 1 Dose Level 22
Phase 1 Dose Level 34
Phase 1 Dose Level 46

[back to top]

Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 39 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Level 12
Phase 1 Dose Level 23
Phase 1 Dose Level 36
Phase 1 Dose Level 45

[back to top]

Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)

These events are reported in the adverse events section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 44.5 months

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Phase 1 Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level 20
Phase 1 Dose Level 31
Phase 1 Dose Level 41

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)12.3
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)23.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II)

Proportion of patients that went two of more cycles of treatment without discontinuing treatment for progression or intolerability. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 42 days

Interventionproportion of partcipants (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).949
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).921

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

Disease response status is based on the IMWG criteria being held for two consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as proportion of patients with minimal response (MR) and better according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).564
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).737

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) from time of study entry to the earlier of death from any cause or end of follow up at 1 year (NCT02030405)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib (MLN9708)0

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate after 3 cycles of treatment (9 weeks) was assessed as complete remission (CR); CR with incomplete recovery (CRi); and partial remission (PR) with MLN9708, in participants with NPM1-mutated AML by LeukemiaNet1 guidelines:~Although achievement of complete remission (CR) has unique clinical significance for improved overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to achievement of CRi with incomplete platelet recovery, the latter is still a clinically meaningful response, as it is independently-superior to resistant disease.~Partial remission (PR) is defined as meeting all hematologic criteria for CR with an allowance for 5% to 25% bone marrow blasts or decrease of pre-treatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%.~Stable disease is defined as a change in bone marrow aspirate blast count within 10% of baseline.~Relapsed disease is defined as reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow blasts" (NCT02030405)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Remission (CR)Complete Remission with incomplete recovery (CRi)Partial Remission (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Relapsed Disease (RD)Progressive Disease (PD)
Ixazomib (MLN9708)000002

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168) hours postdose

Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)1.2252.000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, and PR in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles

Percentage of participants with Overall Response (CR + VGPR + PR), CR, VGPR and PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCRVGPRPR
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)75.016.720.837.5
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)85.719.028.638.1

[back to top]

Combined Response Rate During the Induction Phase in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Participants

Combined Response Rate is the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR), including stringent Complete Response (sCR), and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria during the Induction Phase (Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles). CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)27
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)24

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in NDMM Participants

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the initiation of alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)32.2
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)36.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in RRMM Participants

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)26.3

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.2501.000
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.0401.000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR and Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD) During the Induction Phase

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)79121567120
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)7191562183

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Participants

ORR is the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR or PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells (PC) in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved free light chain (FLC) levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28 day cycle (Up to 45 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)49

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)885.1671338.333
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)792.6001226.600

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) in NDMM Participants

PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)23.5
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)23.0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) in RRMM Participants

PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)14.2

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) in NDMM Participants

TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)30.9
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)32.2

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) in RRMM Participants

TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)16.8

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR) in NDMM Participants During the Induction Phase

TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the initiation of alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)2.2
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.9

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)518.1671241.000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in RRMM Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of End of Treatment (EOT) (Up to 45 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL at EOTPhysical functioning, Change from BL at EOTRole functioning, Change from BL at EOTEmotional functioning, Change from BL at EOTCognitive functioning, Change from BL at EOTSocial functioning, Change from BL at EOTFatigue, Change from BL at EOTNausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at EOTPain, Change from BL at EOTDyspnea, Change from BL at EOTInsomnia, Change from BL at EOTAppetite Loss, Change from BL at EOTConstipation, Change from BL at EOTDiarrhea, Change from BL at EOTFinancial Difficulties, Change from BL at EOT
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)-5.50-6.00-7.67-5.00-5.33-11.335.113.335.0010.00-6.004.672.006.004.00

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR) in RRMM Participants

TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)2.1

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionnanogram/mL (ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)64.28353.145
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)46.60062.280

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)47.40052.229

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in NDMM Participants

"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEGrade 3 or Higher AEsAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose ReductionSAEs
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)352791117
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)3427111020

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs, Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction, SAEs in RRMM Participants

"An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEGrade 3 or Higher AEAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose ReductionSAEs
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)7249193030

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, AEs Resulting in Discontinuation and AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles

"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AESAEAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose Reduction
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)22615
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)20424

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With (CR + VGPR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD in RRMM Participants

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)19514443710

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR + VGPR, CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD Throughout the Entire Treatment Period in NDMM Participants

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCR + VGPRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)8236152167180
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)7132122159186

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) During the Induction Phase in NDMM Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 13 (Up to 1 year)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL; Cycle 13Physical functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Role functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Emotional functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Cognitive functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Social functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Fatigue, Change from BL at Cycle 13Nausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at Cycle 13Pain, Change from BL at Cycle 13Dyspnea, Change from BL at Cycle 13Insomnia, Change from BL at Cycle 13Appetite Loss, Change from BL at Cycle 13Constipation, Change from BL at Cycle 13Diarrhea, Change from BL at Cycle 13Financial Difficulties, Change from BL at Cycle 13
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)3.4714.178.3311.342.789.03-10.88-4.86-13.89-11.11-16.67-18.06-13.89-2.784.17
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)-5.4317.976.522.54-7.25-11.59-6.76-4.35-10.87-7.25-10.14-7.25-5.805.801.45

[back to top]

Response to Combination Therapy (Panobinostat, Dexamethasone, MLN9708)

Response to intervention as measured by international uniform response criteria and clinical benefit response according to modified EBMT response criteria, comparing myeloma panels obtained at the beginning of each cycle that include SPEP, 24 h UPEP, serum and urine IFEs, and serum free light chains to results at screening. In addition a baseline bone marrow exam and skeletal survey will be obtained and repeated as clinically indicated and for assessment of complete remission (bone marrow) (NCT02057640)
Timeframe: 4 months (102 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DL1 - 3mg Lxazomib0
DL2 - 4mg Lxazomib0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival for all will be the number of months from study entry to death from any cause. (NCT02057640)
Timeframe: up to 3 years from start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
DL1 - 3mg Lxazomib12.8
DL2 - 4mg Lxazomib17.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity According to CTCAE Version 4.03

Number of Participants with Dose Limiting Toxicity of MLN9708 (lxazomib) according to CTCAE version 4.03 (NCT02057640)
Timeframe: at 28 days from start of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Levels 14

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival will be the number of days from study entry to progression or death of any cause, whichever comes first.~Progression-free survival is survival with absence of progressive disease, defined by~An increase of 25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following:~Serum M-component (absolute increase must be >0.5 g/100 ml) *~Urine M-component (absolute increase must be >200mg per 24 h)~Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be >100 mg/l)~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be >10%)~And / or:~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/100 ml) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder" (NCT02057640)
Timeframe: 1 year from start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
DL1 - 3mg Lxazomib1.2
DL2 - 4mg Lxazomib3.5

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of MLN9708 (Phase I)

The highest dose level that produces 1/6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle #1 will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The RP2D of ixazomib and pomalidomide will generally be the MTD, but it may be less than the MTD based on a review of available data/cumulative toxicities from phase I. (NCT02119468)
Timeframe: From the initial treatment to Day 28 (Cycle #1)

Interventionmg (Number)
Dose Level #2 (4mg MLN9708)4

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (Phase I)

Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) is defined as any of the toxicities in Section 7.3 that are at least possibly related to either Pomalidomide or MLN9708 that occur during cycle 1. Toxicity graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. The highest dose level that produces 1/6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in course 1 will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The RP2D of ixazomib and pomalidomide will generally be the MTD, but it may be less than the MTD based on a review of available data/cumulative toxicities from phase I. (NCT02119468)
Timeframe: From the initial treatment to Day 28 (Cycle #1)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level #1: 3mg MLN97081
Dose Level #2: 4mg MLN97081

[back to top] [back to top]

One-Year Progression-Free Survival at the Recommend Phase II Dose (RP2D)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from initial treatment to recurrence, progression or death. In a clinical trial, measuring the progression-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. Progression-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula [Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research: volume II, the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 1987;82:1-406.] (NCT02119468)
Timeframe: Date of first dose of study drug to first documented disease relapse, progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, up to 24 months. And the median follow-up for the surviving patients is at least one year.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (%) (Number)
Dose Level #2 (4mg MLN9708)34

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival Time

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from study start until death. (NCT02158975)
Timeframe: 24 months after initiation of study treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN9708NA

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival Time

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from study start until disease progression or death. (NCT02158975)
Timeframe: 24 months after initiation of study treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN97083.2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

The percentage of patients with an objective response rate will be determined. The overall response will be based on response in each compartment (skin, blood, lymph nodes and viscera) using a global composite scoring system. Objective response is considered (CR) Complete Response (Complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease), CRu (Complete Response Unconfirmed), or (PR) Partial Response (Regression of measurable disease). (NCT02158975)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months after initiation of study treatment

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
MLN97088

[back to top]

Number Patients That Experience Adverse Events, Grades 3-5

To assess the safety and tolerability of MLN9708, the number of patients experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) greater than or equal to grade 3 will be recorded. (NCT02158975)
Timeframe: 30 days after the last dose of study drug

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaThrombocytopeniaDiarrheaMucocitisAcute Kidney InjuryAtrial FibrilationDyspneaHypercalcemiaHyponatremiaHypotensionLymph Node PainRashRespiratory FailureSupraventricular TachycardiaThromboembolic Event
MLN9708111111111111111

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time from documentation of tumor response to disease progression. (NCT02158975)
Timeframe: 24 months after initiation of study treatment

Interventionmonths (Number)
MLN970812

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (cGVHD) After Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Maintenance With MLN9708

Incidence of chronic Graft-versus-host disease GVHD was assessed based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical trials in Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease (Filipovich et al. 2005) from date of randomization until date of first documented progression, or date of death from any cause. (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: from date of enrollment every 28 days, up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN9708 - 2.3 mg2
MLN9708 - 3 mg2
MLN9708 - 4 mg2

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years Post-allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Overall survival is measured as the interval from first study treatment until date of death, or date last known alive. (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for approximately 24 weeks after ASCT, then every 3 months thereafter for 2 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN9708 Combined Dose EscalationNA

[back to top]

Number of Phase I Patients Receiving 2.3mg, 3mg, or 4mg MLN9708 Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MLN9708 will be determined as the dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients experiences a DLT during one cycle (28 days) of therapy utilizing the National Cancer Institute Common Technology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0 (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: Collected from day of first dose to the end of the first treatment cycle, up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN9708 - 2.3 mg0
MLN9708 - 3 mg0
MLN9708 - 4 mg0

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years Post-maintenance Therapy

PFS is measured from the date of first protocol treatment until date of disease progression or death occurs, or date of last adequate tumor assessment using the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. IMWG disease progression is defined as an increase of ≥ 25% from the nadir in at least one of the following criteria: 1) serum M-protein, 2) urine M-protein, 3) only in patients with non-measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference in involved and uninvolved FLC levels, 4) Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be ≥10%). OR Disease progression also could include development of new lytic bone lesions or increase from baseline in size of lytic bone lesion(s); development of new soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) or definite increase from nadir in existing soft tissue plasmacytomas; or development of hypercalcemia (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for approximately 24 weeks then every 3 months thereafter for 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN9708 Combined Dose Escalation6.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3/4/5 Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety of MLN9708 When Used as Maintenance After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Multiple Myeloma

Defined as the number of participants with treatment-emergent grade 3/4/5 adverse events/serious adverse events utilizing the National Cancer Institute Common Technology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0 determined to be related to MLN9708. (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: Defined as the time from Day 1 of study drug administration until 30 days after treatment completion for up to 2 years.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN9708 - 2.3 mg1
MLN9708 - 3 mg2
MLN9708 - 4 mg2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (aGVHD) After Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Maintenance With MLN9708

Incidence of acute Graft-versus-host disease GVHD was assessed based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical trials in Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease (Przepiorka et al. 1995) from date of randomization until date of first documented progression, or date of death from any cause. (NCT02168101)
Timeframe: from date of enrollment every 28 days, up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN9708 - 2.3 mg2
MLN9708 - 3 mg2
MLN9708 - 4 mg2

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Recovery Post Transplant

To measure the time to platelet recovery post-transplant (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Haploidentical Transplant29

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Relapse or Progression

To estimate the incidence of relapse/progression at one-year post-transplant. (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haploidentical Transplant10

[back to top]

Neutrophil Engraftment

To obtain time to neutrophil engraftment post-transplant (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Haploidentical Transplant16

[back to top]

Graft Versus Host Disease

To measure days to onset of acute graft versus host disease (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Haploidentical Transplant28.5

[back to top]

Day 30 CD33 Donor Chimerism

To measure CD33 donor chimerism at Day 30 (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionpercentage of chimerism (Median)
Haploidentical Transplant100

[back to top]

Day 30 CD3 Donor Chimerism

To measure CD3 donor chimerism post-transplant (NCT02169791)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionpercentage of chimerism (Median)
Haploidentical Transplant100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Complement Protein C3 and C4 at Day 84

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

,,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Complement Protein C3: BaselineComplement Protein C3: Change at Day 84Complement Protein C4: BaselineComplement Protein C4: Change at Day 84
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg82.2-7.412.4-0.8
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg110.3-19.520.0-6.0
Pooled Placebo122.3-20.329.0-4.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 168

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Placebo0
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg0
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 101 (30 days after last dose of study drug)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Placebo33.3
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg20.0
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 101 (30 days after last dose of study drug)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Placebo0
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg0
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Markedly Abnormal Value (MAV) for Hematologic Parameters

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 168

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Placebo0
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg0
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg50.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Day 84

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

,,
Interventionmilliliter/minute/1.73 square meter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 84
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg130.02.6
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg103.5-0.5
Pooled Placebo88.76.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Ixazomib at Each Scheduled Collection Time

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 168 hours) post-dose (Cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)

,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Pre-dose0.25 hour0.5 hour1 hour1.5 hours2 hours4 hours8 hours24 hours168 hours
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg0.00000.00000.42440.67760.50560.51340.10820.00000.00000.0000
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg0.00000.00002.50332.20002.34002.27671.17000.99670.54930.0000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Levels of Autoantibodies (Anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid [dsDNA]) at Day 84

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

,,
Interventioninternational units/milliliter (IU/mL) (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 84
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg34.37.5
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg129.39.5
Pooled Placebo18.7-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 84

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

,,
Interventionmilligram per milligram creatinine (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 84
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg2.6134-0.4740
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg0.75350.9943
Pooled Placebo1.7567-0.1680

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine (sCR) Level at Day 84

(NCT02176486)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

,,
Interventionmicromoles per liter (mcmol/L) (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 84
Cohort A: Ixazomib 0.5 mg72.4881.768
Cohort B: Ixazomib 2 mg81.77013.260
Pooled Placebo91.347-2.947

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), as evaluated by an independent review committee according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PD was defined as ≥25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M component; participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels must be >10 mg/dL; participants without measurable serum, urine M-protein levels and FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cell percent must have been ≥10%; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size increase; hypercalcemia development. (NCT02181413)
Timeframe: Randomization up to End of treatment (EOT) (24 months); thereafter followed up every 4 weeks until progression of disease or death (to data cutoff: approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo21.3
Ixazomib Citrate26.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicity of MLN9708

A 3+3 design will be employed. At each dose, three patients will be initially evaluated. If no dose limiting toxicities are observed, the MLN9708 dose will be increased; if one dose limiting toxicity is observed, three additional patients will be treated at that dose. A dose at which two DLTs are observed in three or six patients are judged to be too toxic, the lower dose will be defined as the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). (NCT02250300)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventiondose limiting toxicity (Number)
MLN9708 Phase I (3.0 mg)0
MLN9708 Phase I (4.0 mg)0

[back to top]

Maximum-tolerated Dose of MLN9708.

Maximum-tolerated dose of ixazomib (MLN9708) will be determined from the incidence of dose limiting toxicities at each dosage. Results for both escalation phase cohorts (3.0 mg and 4.0 mg) were used to determine the maximum tolerated dose. (NCT02250300)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionmillligram (Number)
Maximum Tolerated Dose of Study Drug4

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease.

The number of participants who have graft-versus-host disease. The two expansion phase cohorts (3.0 mg and 4.0 mg) were not included in this analysis. (NCT02250300)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN9708 Phase II Matched Sibling9
MLN9708 Phase II Matched Unrelated10

[back to top]

MRD-negative Rate After ASCT

For the purposes of this study, a patient will be considered as having minimal residual disease if a positive result (1x10E06) is obtained using the Adaptive Clonoseq MRD testing (NCT02253316)
Timeframe: Prior to beginning consolidation treatment (Day -28 to Day 0)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Consolidation: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone51

[back to top]

Response Rate of IRD Consolidation

For the purposes of this study, response rate is defined as the improvement in complete response rate. Response will be determined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. (NCT02253316)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of IRD consolidation treatment (approximately Day 112 of consolidation treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Consolidation: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

For the purposes of this study, a patient will be considered as having minimal residual disease if a positive result (1x10E06) is obtained using the Adaptive Clonoseq MRD testing. (NCT02253316)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of IRD consolidation treatment (approximately Day 112 of consolidation treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Consolidation: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone19

[back to top]

Compare Response Rate Between the Two Maintenance Arms

"Response will be determined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. Response includes stringent complete response (sCR) and complete response (CR).~sCR requires all of the following:~CR as defined below~Normal free light chain ratio (0.26-1.65)~Absence of clonal cells in the bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence~CR requires all of the following:~Disappearance of monoclonal protein by both protein electrophoresis and immunofixation studies from the blood and urine~If serum and urine monoclonal protein are unmeasurable, Normal free light chain ratio (0.26-1.65)~<5% plasma cells in the bone marrow~Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytoma" (NCT02253316)
Timeframe: Through completion of maintenance treatment (estimated to be day 1095 of maintenance treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maintenance Arm 1: Ixazomib50
Maintenance Arm 2: Lenalidomide80

[back to top]

Toxicity of IRD Consolidation

For the purposes of this study, toxicity will be defined as inability to receive 4 cycles of IRD consolidation due to toxicity. (NCT02253316)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of IRD consolidation treatment (approximately Day 112 of consolidation treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Consolidation: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone7

[back to top]

Rate of MRD-positive to MRD-negative Conversion Between the Two Maintenance Arms

(NCT02253316)
Timeframe: Cycle 13 Day 1 of maintenance treatment (Approximately Day 364 of maintenance treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maintenance Arm 1: Ixazomib5
Maintenance Arm 2: Lenalidomide11

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

RFS defined as interval from date of enrollment to date of first objective documentation of disease relapse or death from any cause. Survival or times to failure and time to progression functions estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02302846)
Timeframe: 84 days

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Ixazomib34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 11 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 14 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 17 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 20 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 23 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 26 Day 1
Placebo-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.00.0-0.0-0.0-0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.10.00.0

[back to top]

Time to Resolution of Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) Events

PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies not elsewhere classified (NEC) according to the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the resolution date or the day before and after. Time to resolution was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the resolution date for resolved events. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo196.0
Ixazomib451.0

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, using IMWG criteria. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.6
Ixazomib17.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Improvement of PN Events

PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies NEC according to the MedDRA. A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the improvement date or the day before and after. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the improvement of event. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo81.0
Ixazomib64.0

[back to top]

Time to End of the Next-line of Therapy After Study Treatment

Time to end of the next line of therapy is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of last dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy following study treatment. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo25.6
Ixazomib23.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2)

PFS2 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to objective PD on next-line treatment using IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to every 12 weeks until second PD or death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo50.3
Ixazomib51.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per IMWG criteria, PD is defined as, increase of 25% of lowest response value in one or more of following criteria: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/ deciliter (dL)); or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24-hour); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (FLC) levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); or bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute plasma cell percentage ≥10%); development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma; or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5mg/dL). (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.4
Ixazomib17.4

[back to top]

PFS in a High-risk Population

High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying del17, t(4;14), t(14;16). PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.6
Ixazomib10.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Conversion From Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive to MRD Negative

Bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were sent to a central laboratory and were assessed for MRD using flow cytometry. MRD negativity was defined as absence of MRD and MRD positivity was defined as presence of MRD. MRD was assessed by 8-color flow cytometry with the IMWG recommended sensitivity of 10^-5. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo3
Ixazomib6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Develop a New Primary Malignancy

(NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.2
Ixazomib5.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo69.5
Ixazomib64.8

[back to top]

OS in a High-risk Population

High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying cytogenetic deletion (del)17, translocation [t](4;14), t(14;16). OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo48.3
Ixazomib37.3

[back to top]

Duration of Next-line Therapy

Duration of next-line therapy is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy coming after study treatment to the date of the last dose. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo14.0
Ixazomib8.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response Category During the Treatment Period

Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria based on IRC assessment. Best response included PR, VGPR and CR. PR= >=50% reduction of serum M protein and >=90% or <200 mg reduction urinary M protein in 24-hour, or >50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, or >50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if bone marrow plasma cells >30% and >50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas at baseline. VGPR= >90% reduction (<100 mg/24-hour) in serum M-protein + urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis. Complete response= >5% plasma cells in myelogram with absence of paraprotein in serum and urine according to immunofixation. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PRVGPRCR
Ixazomib253431
Placebo293728

[back to top]

Correlation of MRD Status With PFS and OS

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. Participants with various types of known MRD status were pooled together for analysis of overall survival in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
PFS for Participants with Known MRD+ at Study EntryPFS for Participants with Known MRD- at Study EntryOS for Participants with Known MRD Status (MRD- Status, MRD+ Status) at Study Entry
Ixazomib16.940.5NA
Placebo9.3NANA

[back to top]

Correlation Between Frailty Status and PFS and OS

Participant's frailty status is classified as fit, unfit or frail on the bases of 4 components: age, the Charlson comorbidity scoring system without age weighting, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. The sum of the 4 frailty scores equals the total frailty score. A total frailty score of 0 corresponds to a frailty status of fit; a total score of 1, to unfit; and a total score of 2 or more, to frail. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS will be measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
PFS Based on Frailty Status of FitPFS Based on Frailty Status of UnfitPFS Based on Frailty Status of FrailOS Based on Frailty Status of FitOS Based on Frailty Status of UnfitOS Based on Frailty Status of Frail
Ixazomib18.617.615.4NANA46.5
Placebo8.510.611.1NANA42.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS)

"The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question How would you rate your overall health during the past week? are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS." (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 (cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26
Ixazomib-0.1-1.2-0.60.6-1.5-0.7-0.40.1-1.60.20.3-0.5-1.1-0.70.5-0.21.71.10.41.31.00.92.30.30.9
Placebo1.72.11.51.81.03.10.91.42.03.93.94.23.12.22.52.40.51.61.11.51.62.1-0.30.02.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 11 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 14 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 17 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 20 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 23 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 26 Day 1PFSFU- Visit 37PDFU- Visit 26
Ixazomib-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.01.01.0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib

Plasma concentrations of the complete hydrolysis product of ixazomib citrate (ixazomib) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (1 and 4 hours post-dose Day 1, Days 8 and 15 pre-dose); Cycle 2 and 5 (Days 1 and 8 pre-dose) and Cycles 3, 4, 6 to 10 (Day 1 pre-dose) (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 - 1 Hour Post-doseCycle 1 Day 1 - 4 Hours Post-doseCycle 1 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 15 - Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 6 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 8 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 9 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1 - Pre-dose
Ixazomib19.35312.6981.6832.8281.9583.2172.2522.3632.3284.5472.5032.5852.6062.5662.686

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of ixazomib or placebo through 30 days after the last dose of ixazomib or placebo. A SAE means any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered medically significant. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 88 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SAETEAE
Ixazomib2492
Placebo1782

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of disease progression. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment start

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab33

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Duration of time from start of treatment to disease progression. Progressive disease is defined as occurring when a >25% increase in serum IgM and an absolute 500mg/dL increase in IgM level occurs from the lowest attained response value, or progression of clinically significant disease related symptoms. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment start

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab33

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response Rate (VGPR) for IDR

Rate of very good partial response or better in patients treated with IDR. VGPR is defined as a >90% reduction in serum IgM levels from baseline. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: 76 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab5

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

The duration of response is measured from the time a participant achieved a response until the date of progression. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: From the time each participant achieved a response to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment start

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab33

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall response includes the rate of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), stabl disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Minor response is >25%-50% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Partial Response is (>50-90% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Very Good Partial Response is >90% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Complete Response is resolution of all symptoms, normalization of serum IgM with disappearance of IgM paraprotein, resolution of any adenopathy or splenomegaly. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab25

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM Status

To evaluate the overall response rate of participants by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM mutations in WM. Overall response is defined as achieving at least a minor response, or >25% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. (NCT02400437)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MYD88 Mutated, CXCR4 Wild-type11
MYD88 Mutated, CXCR4 Mutated14

[back to top]

Evaluation of the Toxicities Associated With Ixazomib With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone.

(NCT02412228)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of study, up to 2 years, end of study reported

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib Regimen12

[back to top]

Evaluation of the Response Rate of Ixazomib With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone for First-line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

(NCT02412228)
Timeframe: Through study treatment completion, an average of 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib Regimen12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival

The primary endpoint compares progression-free survival as a time to event endpoint from randomization between patients randomized to ixazomib and placebo maintenance in high risk multiple myeloma. Participants are considered a failure of the primary endpoint if they die or suffer from disease progression or if they initiate non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy. Disease progression was evaluated using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Participants must meet one of the criteria for disease progression specified in the protocol. The time to this event is the time from randomization to progression, death, or initiation of non-protocol anti myeloma therapy whichever comes first. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate progression-free survival during the 2 year post-transplant follow-up period. Participants who were event-free at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance65.355.3
Placebo72.759.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Time Point

All Grade 2 and 3 infections are reported according to the BMT CTN MOP (Manual of Procedures) where a higher grade corresponds to more severe symptoms. The cumulative incidence of severe, life-threatening, or fatal infections (Grade 3), treating death as a competing event, are estimated at 6, 12 and 18 months post randomization using Aalen-Johansen estimators for each treatment group. Comparison of cumulative incidence between the two treatment arms was done using a Z test at fixed time points. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months Post-randomization12 Months Post-randomization18 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance4.84.84.8
Placebo0.00.00.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Infection Type

All Grade 2 and 3 infections are reported according to the BMT CTN MOP (Manual of Procedures) where a higher grade corresponds to more severe symptoms. The number of participants with post-randomization infections in each treatment arm is described by severity and type of infection. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-randomization

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with InfectionsMaximum Severity: Grade 2Maximum Severity: Grade 3Participants with Bacterial InfectionParticipants with Viral InfectionParticipants with Fungal InfectionParticipants with Other Infection
Ixazomib Maintenance8623601
Placebo1110121110

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Response to Treatment After Randomization

Response was assessed using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Best response is the best of all the disease response status at each assessment time point after randomization. The order from best to worst is: Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), and Progressive Disease (PD). All disease classifications are relative to the patient's disease status prior to allogeneic transplant (i.e. study entry). This outcome was compared between treatment groups using all response data up to 2 years post-transplant. These response data were summarized separately for patients in sCR/CR at the time of randomization vs. those who were not in sCR/CR at the time of randomization. Within each group (in sCR/CR vs not in sCR/CR at randomization), best response to treatment was compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's Exact test instead of a chi-square test because of the small sample size. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676
Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
Ixazomib Maintenance6
Placebo5
Ixazomib Maintenance2
Ixazomib Maintenance0
Placebo0
Placebo1
Ixazomib Maintenance3
Placebo4
Placebo3
Ixazomib Maintenance4
Ixazomib Maintenance1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as freedom from death from any cause. OS post-randomization is estimated for each arm using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared between arms using the log rank test. Participants who are alive at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. Confidence intervals for values of 100% were not calculated and are shown as 100%. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance100.094.7
Placebo90.986.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Time Point

Toxicities are graded using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Higher grades correspond to worse symptoms with the minimum grade being a 0 and the maximum grade being a 5. The cumulative incidence of Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was estimated at 6, 12 and 18 months post randomization using Aalen-Johansen estimators for each treatment group. Death from a cause other than toxicity was treated as a competing risk. Comparison of cumulative incidence between the two treatment arms was done using a Z test at fixed time points. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months Post-randomization12 Months Post-randomization18 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance57.161.961.9
Placebo63.668.272.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Toxicity Type

Toxicities are graded using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Higher grades correspond to worse symptoms with the minimum grade being a 0 and the maximum grade being a 5. Toxicities post-randomization are described for each treatment arm by the type of toxicity as well as peak overall grade. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-randomization

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maximum Toxicity Grade : 0 - 2Maximum Toxicity Grade : 3Maximum Toxicity Grade : 4Maximum Toxicity Grade : 5Abnormal Liver SymptomsDysgeusiaEncephalopathyGrade 3-5 Allergic ReactionGrade 3-5 AnaphylaxisGrade 3-5 Blood/Lymphatic ToxicityGrade 3-5 Cardiac ToxicityGrade 3-5 FatigueGrade 3-5 FeverGrade 3-5 GI ToxicityGrade 3-5 Hearing LossGrade 3-5 HemorrhageGrade 3-5 Hepatobiliary/PancreasGrade 3-5 HyperthyroidismGrade 3-5 HypothyroidismGrade 3-5 Metabolic ToxicityGrade 3-5 Musculoskeletal ToxicityGrade 3-5 Nervous System ToxicityGrade 3-5 Ocular ToxicityGrade 3-5 Renal ToxicityGrade 3-5 Respiratory ToxicityGrade 3-5 Skin/Subcutaneous Tissue ToxicityGrade 3-5 Vascular ToxicityHepatitisIntestinal ObstructionLiver FailureSevere Muscle Weakness/ParalysisSudden Vision LossTumor Lysis Syndrome
Ixazomib Maintenance8130031000563060010041400212010001
Placebo6141122010873070070163425853100100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment

Response was assessed using the International Uniform Response Criteria. All disease classifications are relative to the patient's disease status prior to allogeneic transplant (i.e. study entry). Response to treatment after randomization (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) is summarized in each arm post-transplant at 18 months and 24 months post-transplant. These response data were summarized separately for patients in sCR/CR at the time of randomization vs. those who were not in sCR/CR at the time of randomization. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 18 months and 24 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676
Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Not EvaluablePartial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Died Before Evaluation
Ixazomib Maintenance3
Placebo3
Placebo2
Placebo0
Ixazomib Maintenance2
Placebo4
Ixazomib Maintenance4
Placebo1
Placebo6
Ixazomib Maintenance0
Ixazomib Maintenance1
Ixazomib Maintenance5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD were determined using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Death prior to chronic GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Cumulative incidences are compared between treatment arms using Gray's test. Data of chronic GVHD were collected from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the 2014 NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs are scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement; 3 indicates the worst symptom. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD are also recorded. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance68.668.6
Placebo63.663.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Short Form 36 (SF-36) Score

The MOS SF-36 instrument is a general assessment of health quality of life with eight components: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Pain Index, General Health Perceptions, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health Index. The scale is 0 to 100 where 0 is maximum disability and 100 is no disability, so the higher the score the more positive the outcome. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used as the outcome measures in summarizing the SF-36 data for this study. This self-reported questionnaire was completed at transplant, randomization, 6 months following the start of maintenance therapy (which corresponds to 6 months post-randomization), and 24 months post-transplant. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed prior to maintenance, 6 months post-randomization and at 24 months after transplant. Only English and Spanish speaking patients were eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this trial. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: Randomization, 6 months post-randomization, 24 months post-transplant

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
PCS: RandomizationPCS: 6 Months Post-randomizationPCS: 24 Months Post-transplantPCS: Change from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationPCS: Change from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplantMCS: RandomizationMCS: 6 Months Post-randomizationMCS: 24 Months Post-transplantMCS: Change from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationMCS: Change from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplant
Ixazomib Maintenance38.747.945.13.34.751.554.856.1-0.64.9
Placebo41.541.245.71.07.849.954.549.55.3-2.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD (Grades III-IV)

Cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD were determined using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Death prior to acute GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Cumulative incidences are compared between treatment arms using Gray's test. Grading of acute GVHD was derived by consensus grading per BMT Clinical Trials Network (CTN) manual of procedures (MOP). The acute GVHD algorithm calculates the grade based on the organ (skin, GI and liver) stage and etiology/biopsy reported on the weekly GVHD form. Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II aGVHD is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-4 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver. Grade 4 is the worst outcome. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 100 days post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib Maintenance9.5
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

Disease progression was evaluated using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Participants in sCR/CR must meet at least one of the criteria for disease progression specified in the protocol for sCR/CR participants; those not in sCR/CR must meet at least one of the disease progression criteria specified in the protocol for those not in sCR/CR. The cumulative incidence of progression from randomization will be estimated for each treatment arm using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, with death in remission treated as a competing risk. Initiation of anti-myeloma therapy will be considered evidence of progression. Participants who were event-free at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance34.744.7
Placebo27.336.4

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Total Score

The FACT-BMT version 4.0 instrument is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), which evaluates the health-related quality of life (HQL) of patients receiving treatment for cancer, and the BMT Concerns module, that addresses disease and treatment-related questions specific to bone marrow transplant. This scale goes from 0 to 196 where higher scores indicate better functioning. The FACT-BMT Total, which has all items in the FACT-G and BMT modules, was used as the outcome measure. This self-reported questionnaire was completed at transplant, randomization, 6 months following the start of maintenance therapy (which corresponds to 6 months post-randomization), and 24 months post-transplant. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed prior to maintenance, 6 months post-randomization and at 24 months after transplant. Only English and Spanish speaking patients were eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this trial. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: Randomization, 6-months post-randomization, 24 months post-transplant

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Randomization6 Months Post-randomization24 Months Post-transplantChange from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationChange from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplant
Ixazomib Maintenance100.0121.4121.55.012.6
Placebo110.0114.0109.07.03.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was determined as the average number of months subjects survived following enrollment. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone23.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

This measure is the number of months participants remain free from evidence of disease. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone5.2

[back to top]

Cumulative Response Rates in Patients After Eight Cycles.

Percentage of subject response rates at any point during the eight cycles. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone28

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

Median time in months participants maintain CR, PR or stable disease. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone5.1

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine

Maximum tolerated dose of bendamustine in combination with fixed doses of ixazomib (MLN9708) and dexamethasone will be determined from the incidence of dose limiting toxicities at each dosage. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: Six months for each dosing cohort

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone80

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A 3+3 design was employed. At each dose, three patients were initially evaluated. If no dose limiting toxicities were observed, the bendamustine dose was increased; if one dose limiting toxicity is observed, three additional patients were treated at that dose. A dose at which 2 DLTs were observed in 3 or 6 patients were judged to be too toxic and the lower dose was defined as the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine (70 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone0
Bendamustine (80 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone1
Bendamustine (90 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was defined as the number of subjects achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after at least four cycles of ixazomib (MLN9708) and bendamustine plus dexamethasone. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone11

[back to top]

12-month PFS (Progression Free Survival) of Treatment With Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R (Phase II)

12-month PFS will be defined as the percentage of patients alive and progression free 12 months from start of therapy. Patients lost to follow up will be censored from last point of contact. PFS was calculated using a Kplan-meier estimation with the probability of patients being progression free at 12 months, presented as the percentage based on this probability. (NCT02481310)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months from initiation of treatment

Interventionprobability (%) of patients alive (Number)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy, Rituximab, Ixazomib)75.84

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Serum Osteocalcin From Baseline to End of Study in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

To evaluate the effect of Ixazomib on inducing osteoblast activation as measured by change in serum osteocalcin from baseline to end of study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. (NCT02499081)
Timeframe: Baseline, Treatment (28-day cycles for 6 cycles)

Interventionng/ML (Median)
Ixazomib20.00

[back to top]

Incidence of Discontinuation of All Systemic Immune Suppressive Therapies

The incidence of complete discontinuation of all systemic immune-suppressive therapies will be determined at 1 year. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)0

[back to top]

Biologic Studies

The biologic impact of proteasome inhibition in the treatment of chronic GVHD will be assessed. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)0

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Primary Malignancy Relapse

Defined as hematologic relapse or any unplanned intervention to prevent progression of disease in patients with evidence (molecular, cytogenetic, flow cytometric, radiographic) of malignant disease after transplantation. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)1

[back to top]

Probability of Failure-free Survival at 1 Year

Kaplan-Meier estimate assessed at 1 year for failure-free survival, defined as the absence of death from any cause, relapse or addition of secondary immune suppressive agents. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionprobability of failure-free survival (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)0.57

[back to top]

Probability of Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year

Kaplan-Meier estimate assessed at 1 year for probability of non-relapse mortality, defined as death in the absence of primary malignancy relapse after transplant. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionnon-relapse mortality probability (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)0.1

[back to top]

Probability of Overall Survival at 1 Year

Kaplan-Meier estimate assessed at 1 year for overall survival, defined as absence of death from any cause. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionprobability of overall survival (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate).9

[back to top]

Probability of Treatment Failure at 6 Months

Kaplan-Meier estimate assessed at 6 months for probability of treatment failure, defined as addition of a line of systemic immune-suppressive therapy, recurrent malignancy, or death. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionTreatment failure probability (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate).28

[back to top]

Treatment Success

Treatment success will be estimated at 1 year with a composite outcome of complete resolution of all reversible chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) manifestations, discontinuation of all systemic immune suppressive agents, and freedom from death or primary malignancy relapse after transplant. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)0

[back to top]

Use of Additional Systemic Immune Suppressive Therapies

Addition of therapy after ixazomib constitutes failure, could occur at any time from baseline to 12mo. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)21

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days following completion of study treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsNon-Serious Adverse Events
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)1918

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Complete Response + Partial Response)

ORR at 6 months will be determined by both clinician-defined categories of complete response and partial response, as well as separately calculated according to the proposed response definitions of the NIH Consensus Conference. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Physician impression ORRNIH ORR
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)1617

[back to top]

Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale

Lee symptom scale (LSS) has subscales with min=0, max=100; results given are 12mo scores, with higher numbers indicating higher symptom burden. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
skin scaleenergy scalelung scaleeye scalenutrition scalepsychological scalemouth scaleoverall summary score
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)15251050016.7020.8

[back to top]

Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Short Form-36 (SF-36)

SF-36 subscales have min=0 and max=100; results given are actual scores at 12mo, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life. (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
norm-based physical functioningnorm-based role-physical scorenorm-based bodily pain scorenorm-based general health scorenorm-based vitality scorenorm-based social functioning scorenorm-based role-emotional scorenorm-based mental health scorestandardized physical component scorestandardized mental component score
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)44.437.346.136.24951.448.152.839.753.8

[back to top]

Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACT)

"FACT-BMT subscales have various min/max, see below; results given are actual 12mo scores, with higher scores indicating better functioning.~FACT physical well-being (0-28) FACT social/family well-being (0-28) FACT emotional well-being (0-24) FACT functional well-being (0-28) FACT Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) subscale (0-40) FACT trial outcome index (0-96) FACT-General (G) (0-108) FACT-BMT total (0-148)" (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
physical well-beingsocial/family well-beingemotional well-beingfunctional well-beingBMT subscaleFACT-Gtrial outcome indexFACT-BMT total
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)2323.721183284.772114.1

[back to top]

Symptoms as Measured by Patient Self-report--Human Activities Profile (HAP)

"HAP subscales have min=0 and max=94; results given are actual 12mo scores, with higher scores indicating better functioning.~Maximum Activity Score (MAS) is highest item number answered still doing. Represents highest oxygen demanding activity that respondent still performs.~Adjusted Activity Score (AAS) is MAS minus total number of stopped doing responses below MAS. A measure of usual daily activities.~Modified AAS is MAS minus total number of stopped doing responses below MAS but not penalized for not doing activities not permitted post transplant. The following items are not counted against the score:11,15,19,20,22,25,34,41,42,47,49,50,52,53,54,57,72,73,77,78." (NCT02513498)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
maximum activity scoreadjusted activity scoremodified adjusted activity score
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate)747070

[back to top]

Extramedullary Response Rate

Extramedullary response, defined as a response by extramedullary plasmacytoma or plasma cell count parameters. The extramedullary response rate will be estimated by the number of responders(patients that achieved a partial or complete response) divided by the number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02547662)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)0.40

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate

A confirmed response is defined as a patient who has achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (PR), or PR on two consecutive evaluations. The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT02547662)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)0.06

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

Number of patients with adverse events is reported here, the full list of those adverse events and their frequency is reported in the adverse event section. (NCT02547662)
Timeframe: 4 years 1 month

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)17

[back to top]

Biochemical Response Rate

The biochemical response rate will be estimated by the number of responders(patients that achieved partial or complete response) divided by the number of evaluable patients who have measurable disease by serum M-protein, urine M-protein, or serum FLC assay at baseline. Exact binomial confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02547662)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)0.25

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT02547662)
Timeframe: 4 years 8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)4.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Graded According to CTCAE Version 4.0

Adverse events Toxicity during the 24 months plus one month of post autologous transplant maintenance therapy (NCT02619682)
Timeframe: 2 years plus one month

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Post Autologous Transplant Maintenance30

[back to top]

Overall Survival

all MM patients who got post autologous transplant study therapy (NCT02619682)
Timeframe: Median 4.6 years from start of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Post Autologous Transplant Maintenance21

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

(NCT02619682)
Timeframe: Median of 4.6 years from start of study therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Post Autologous Transplant Maintenance11

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Safety and Tolerability of Ixazomib

Safety was assessed with routine postoperative laboratory, vital sign, neurologic exam, and imaging studies through the day of surgery to staple or suture removal. This data was collected and any adverse events graded and their relationship to ixazomib administration determined. (NCT02630030)
Timeframe: At the time of surgery, approximately 3 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) was used to stratify any adverse patient response to ixazomib. There were no clinically relevant adverse events as a result of ixazomib administration. (NCT02630030)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib3

[back to top]

Concentration of Ixazomib in Tumor Tissue

The relationship between patient's demographic, tumor and drug concentration results will be assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient and tested with Wald's test. In addition, the mean and standard error of the concentrations will be estimated using a random-effects model to account for the within-patient correlation of the tumor biopsy samples. Given the limited number of observations, a relatively simple covariance matrix (e.g. compound symmetry) will be assumed. (NCT02630030)
Timeframe: At time of surgery, approximately 3 hours

Interventionng/g (Number)ng/g (Number)
Participant 3 Sample 1Participant 3 Sample 2Participant 3 Sample 3Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3
Ixazomib7.882.034.172.703.2521.818.036.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 (Phase II)

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3+ Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 3+ Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 3+ Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly Related
Phase 2: Dose Level 114131092013139900534220

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Phase II)

The distribution of overall survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II and MTD21.0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (Phase II)

The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II and MTD3.8

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Response (CR) (Phase II)

The rate of CR will be estimated by the number of patients with a sCR or CR or divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportions will be calculated. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II and MTD0

[back to top]

Rate of Partial Response (PR) (Phase II)

The rate of PR will be estimated by the number of patients with a VGPR or PR divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportions will be calculated. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II and MTD2

[back to top]

Rate of Confirmed Response, Defined as a Patient Who Has Achieved a Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), or Partial Response (PR) on Two Consecutive Evaluations (Phase II)

Responses will be summarized by simple descriptive summary statistics delineating complete and partial responses as well as stable and progressive disease in this patient population. The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRSDNACRVGPRsCR
Phase II and MTD2614000

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib Citrate and Idasanutlin in Combination With Dexamethasone (Phase I)

Defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients). DLT is graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1: Dose Level 00
Phase 1: Dose Level 10
Phase 1: Dose Level 22
Phase 2: Dose Level 11

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 (Phase I)

Overall toxicity incidence as well as toxicity profiles by dose level, patient and tumor site will be explored and summarized. Frequency distributions, graphical techniques and other descriptive measures will form the basis of these analyses. (NCT02633059)
Timeframe: 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, up to 3 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3+ Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 3+ Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 3+ Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 3+ Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 4+ Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 4+ Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly RelatedGrade 5 Non-heme Adverse Events, Regardless of AttributionGrade 5 Non-heme Adverse Events, At Least Possibly Related
Phase 1: Dose Level 0320000320000110000
Phase 1: Dose Level 1441100441100210000
Phase 1: Dose Level 2333200333200000000

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Duration of overall response: The duration of overall response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started).~The duration of overall CR is measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR until the first date that progressive disease is objectively documented." (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)2.7
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)8.9
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)5.5
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD8.7

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Oral Ixazomib

"To determine the MTD of the combination of oral ixazomib and lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated low-grade B cell lymphoma having high tumor burden by GELF criteria or FLIPI 3-5.~MTD will be determined using the first 12 participants 15 months after beginning treatment" (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: 15 months after beginning treatment

Interventionmg (Number)
Lenalidomide + Ixazomib + Rituximab4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

These criteria are based on the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma and include the following categories: Complete Response (CR)(Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease, and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy), Partial Response (PR) (A ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or extranodal masses), Stable Disease (SD) (Failing to attain the criteria needed for a PR or CR, but not fulfilling those for progressive disease), Relapse and Progression (PD) (For determination of relapsed and progressive disease, lymph nodes should be considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 cm, regardless of the short axis). (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete responseStable DiseasePartial ResponseRelapse and Progression
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)1200
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)2001
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)2311
Expansion Cohort 2: Non-Follicular Lymphoma at MTD0000
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD5000

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure (event-free survival) is defined as the time from study entry to first event of disease progression, discontinuation of treatment for any reason, initiation of new treatment, or death. (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)10
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)0
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)6.1
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD5.8

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)0
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)2.5
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)9.0
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD4.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"A number of participants who survived without disease progression~PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first.~Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)3
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)2
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)5
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD5
Expansion Cohort 2: Non-Follicular Lymphoma at MTD0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the date of study entry to the date of death. (NCT02898259)
Timeframe: Up to 15 months after beginning treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DL1 (Ixazomib 2.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)3
DL2 (Ixazomib 3.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)3
DL3/MTD (Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide 20 mg + Rituximab 375mg/m2)6
Expansion Cohort I: Follicular Lymphoma at MTD5
Expansion Cohort 2: Non-Follicular Lymphoma at MTD0

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD as assessed using IMWG criteria. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dL); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dL); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg22.57

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg22.05

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response (Complete Response (CR) + VGPR)

Response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR was defined as negative immunofixation in serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg50.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR:percentage of participants with CR including stringent complete response(sCR),VGPR,partial response(PR) per independent review committee(IRC)by IMWG criteria.CR: serum,urine -ve immunofixation; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5%plasma cells in bone marrow(CR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels=normal FLC ratio 0.26 to 1.65+CR criteria).sCR:CR+normal FLC ratio,absence of clonal plasma cells(immunohistochemistry)or 2-to 4-color flow cytometry.VGPR:serum,urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,not by electrophoresis or ≥90%reduction,<100mg/24hrs(VGPR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels,requires>90%decrease in involved-uninvolved FLC level difference).PR: ≥50%reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hr urinary M protein by≥90%/ to<200mg/24-hr or ≥50%decrease in difference between involved-uninvolved FLC levels/≥50%reduction in bone marrow plasma cells,if≥30%at baseline/≥50%soft tissue plasmacytoma size reduction. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg84.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg34

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as time in months from date of first documentation of response, VGPR or better, and ORR (CR+PR (including sCR and VGPR) or better, to date of first documented PD among participants who responded to treatment. Response was assessed by investigator using IMWG Criteria. CR:negative immunofixation in serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and;<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR:CR plus normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. VGPR:serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours. PR:≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
VGPR or betterORR
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA21.65

[back to top]

Culturable HIV by Quantitative Viral Outgrowth Assay

Infectious units per million CD4 T cells (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits per million (Median)
Baseline24 weeks
Ixazomib 1 mg0.490.30
Ixazomib 2 mg0.300.48
Ixazomib 3 mg0.620.82
Ixazomib 4 mg1.541.31

[back to top]

Cell Associated HIV DNA in CD4 T Cell Subsets

HIV copies per million CD4 T cells (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
Interventioncopies per million (Median)
Baseline24 weeks
Ixazomib 1 mg378394
Ixazomib 2 mg626425
Ixazomib 3 mg664.8624
Ixazomib 4 mg416481

[back to top]

CD4/CD8 Ratio

CD4/CD8 T cell count ratio (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionratio (Median)
Baseline24 weeks
Ixazomib 1 mg1.451.84
Ixazomib 2 mg1.140.92
Ixazomib 3 mg1.281.17
Ixazomib 4 mg1.581.75

[back to top]

Absolute CD8 T Cell Count

Cells per microliter (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
Interventioncells/mmˆ(3) (Median)
Baseline24 weeks
Ixazomib 1 mg508387
Ixazomib 2 mg803885
Ixazomib 3 mg1014689
Ixazomib 4 mg573416

[back to top]

Absolute CD4 T Cell Count

Cells per microliter (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
Interventioncells/mmˆ(3) (Median)
Baseline24 weeks
Ixazomib 1 mg724714
Ixazomib 2 mg914809
Ixazomib 3 mg1130765
Ixazomib 4 mg735632

[back to top]

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Number of treatment-emergent adverse events experienced by subjects as defined by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (NCT02946047)
Timeframe: 7 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib 1 mg0
Ixazomib 2 mg0
Ixazomib 3 mg0
Ixazomib 4 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT03169361)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Week (From start of administration to the end of 6 cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib 4 mg642

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) refers to AE related to administered drug. (NCT03169361)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Week (From start of administration to the end of 6 cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib 4 mg573

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause, up to 3 years are reported. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg18.8

[back to top]

Health Care Utilization (HU): Number of Participants With at Least One Medical Encounter

Healthcare resources used during medical encounters included hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HospitalizationsEmergency Room StaysOutpatient Visits
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg231132
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg16929

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR: Time from first documentation of CR/PR/VGPR to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PR:>=50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% to <200 mg/24-hour or >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/ >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if >=30% at Baseline/ >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR: serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR:negative immunofixation on serum + urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PD:serum M-component increase >=0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase >=200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell >=10%/development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg14.3
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg14.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), or complete response (CR) based on laboratory results and IRC assessment using modified IMWG criteria. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when baseline value >=30% and; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5 % plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg41
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg38

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PD required 1 of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (increase must be >=0.5 g/dl; Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 mg/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: Bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (>11.5 mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg5.1
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg8.4

[back to top]

HU: Duration of Medical Encounters

Duration of healthcare resources used during medical encounters including hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits was reported in days. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years

,
Interventiondays (Median)
HospitalizationsEmergency Room StaysOutpatient Visits
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg1.01.03.0
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg2.01.04.0

[back to top]

HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module 20 (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, side effects of treatment), and 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the future perspective scale indicate better perspective of the future, for the body image scale indicate better body image and for the disease symptoms scale indicate higher level of symptomatology. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: End of TreatmentSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: End of TreatmentBody Image: BaselineBody Image: End of TreatmentFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: End of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg72.468.981.477.882.983.767.564.0
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg73.273.581.074.481.575.058.857.9

[back to top] [back to top]

HRQOL Based on EORTC QLQ-C30 SubScale Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a QOL scale. Most of the 30 items had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale. Each subscale raw score were linearly transformed to a total score between 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL. The Physical domain of the functional subscale is reported in the secondary outcome measure 7. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL: BaselineGlobal Health Status/QoL: End of TreatmentRole (Functional Scale): BaselineRole (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentEmotional (Functional Scale): BaselineEmotional (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentCognitive(Functional Scale): BaselineCognitive (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentSocial (Functional Scale): BaselineSocial (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentFatigue (Symptom Scale): BaselineFatigue (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentNausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): BaselineNausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentPain (Symptom Scale): BaselinePain (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentDyspnea (Symptom Scale): BaselineDyspnea (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentInsomnia (Symptom Scale): BaselineInsomnia (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentAppetite Loss (Symptom Scale): BaselineAppetite Loss (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentConstipation (Symptom Scale): BaselineConstipation (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentDiarrhea (Symptom Scale): BaselineDiarrhea (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentFinancial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): BaselineFinancial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg60.848.267.949.283.172.884.077.475.769.861.050.394.892.965.253.219.024.629.529.414.323.011.419.816.716.317.112.7
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg57.047.867.447.674.967.679.669.672.263.160.050.896.788.761.151.225.240.532.636.922.234.513.325.017.819.022.216.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: Time from randomization to first occurrence of confirmed progressive disease (PD) as assessed by investigator by International Myeloma Working Group(IMWG) response criteria/death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD requires following: Increase of >=25 % from nadir in: Serum M component (increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dl]); Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 milligram [mg]/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new/increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (>11.5mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg4.8
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg7.1

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of PR/VGPR/CR. Per IMWG criteria, PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M-protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when Baseline value >=30% and; if present at Baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg1.1
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg2.0

[back to top]

HRQOL Based on EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter (cm), vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores from all dimensions were combined into a single index score that was reported, where higher score was better quality of life. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg64.455.9
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg59.246.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Based on 5-level Classification System of the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score

EQ-5D-5L comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, 5= extremely severe problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across the five dimensions. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mobility: 1 = I Have no Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 2 = I Have Slight Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 4 = I Have Severe Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 5 = I am Unable to Walk AboutSelf-Care: 1 = I Have no Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 5 = I am Unable to Wash or Dress MyselfUsual Activities: 1 = I Have no Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 5 = I am Unable to do my Usual ActivitiesPain/Discomfort: 1 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 2 = I Have Slight Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 3 = I Have Moderate Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 4 = I Have Severe Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 5 = I Have Extreme Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 1 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 2 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 3 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 4 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 5 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg91211812110442109127381015621913612
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg5688013653047871351360681120

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events Graded According to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version (v) 12.1

The number of patients experiencing a grade 3 or greater adverse event will be reported. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. (NCT03202628)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, ASCT)7

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Alive at 30 Months

The distribution of overall survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT03202628)
Timeframe: 30 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, ASCT)75

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate

Will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a stringent complete response (sCR), complete response CR, or VGPR divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true overall >= VGPR will be calculated. (NCT03202628)
Timeframe: 30 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, ASCT)25

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a stringent complete response (sCR), complete response CR, very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true overall response rate will be calculated. (NCT03202628)
Timeframe: 30 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, ASCT)50

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 18 Months (PFS18) Defined as the Proportion of Patients Alive and Free From Disease Progression at 18 Months From Study Entry

The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. If patients are censored prior to 18 months post registration, a Kaplan Meier (Kaplan, E. and Meier, P., 1958) estimate for PFS18 along with the 95% confidence intervals will be reported. (NCT03202628)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, ASCT)0.3750

[back to top]

Change in Circulating APRIL Levels as Assessed by APRIL ELISA Assay

B cell activating factor belonging to a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are members of the TNF ligand superfamily. Plasma APRIL ELISA assay can be performed in 2-3 hours. It can be used as a marker of disease activity in sensitized patients. (NCT03213158)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionpg/ml (Median)
Baseline3 months
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates163172

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Malignancies Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates0

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib: as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Distal Neuropathy Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates1

[back to top]

Change in Circulating BAFF Levels as Assessed by BAFF ELISA Assay

B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF) are members of the TNF ligand superfamily. Plasma BAFF ELISA assays can be performed in 2-3 hours. It can be used as a marker of disease activity in sensitized patients. (NCT03213158)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline3 months
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates126160

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Thrombocytopenia Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates0

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Hematological Complications Within 12 Months

Hematological complications include leucopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia (NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates2

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal Symptoms Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates5

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Complications Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates2

[back to top]

Safety of Ixazomib as Assesses by Percentage of Participants Caught Infection Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates5

[back to top]

Efficacy of Ixazomib: Percentage of Participants With > 20 Percent Decline in Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA)

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates0

[back to top]

Efficacy of Ixazomib: Percentage of Participants Received Successful Kidney Transplantation Within 12 Months

(NCT03213158)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive or Negative in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR

MRD was measured by the flow cytometry method using bone marrow aspiration. Reported data were numbers of participants with MRD positive and negative in bone marrow in participants who achieved CR. MRD positive was categorized into three sensitivity levels with the numbers of cells counted (10^-4 to - Max; 10^-5 to 10^-4; 10^-6 to 10^-5). MRD negativity is defined as absence of MRD and MRD positivity is defined as presence of MRD. If a participant is MRD-positive at their first evaluation and MRD-negative after re-examination, the participant will be considered to be MRD-negative. CR will be assessed by IMWG Criteria. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sensitivity Level; 10^-4=< - MaxSensitivity Level; 10^-5=< - <10^-4Sensitivity Level; 10^-6=< - <10^-5Negative
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy1215
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy1325
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0110

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 23 cycles for VRd Group, Up to 32 cycles for KRd and Overall Group, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: Cycle 23Disease Symptoms: Cycle 32Side-Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 23Side-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 32Body Image: BaselineBody Image: Cycle 23Body Image: Cycle 32Future Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: Cycle 23Future Perspective: Cycle 32
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy19.234.632.7816.6016.0518.5223.0816.6716.6744.1635.1927.78
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy19.883.972.7816.6114.2918.5225.9314.2916.6747.1631.7527.78

[back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 23 cycles for VRd Group, Up to 32 cycles for KRd and Overall Group, each cycle was of 28 days)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: Cycle 23Side-Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 23Body Image: BaselineBody Image: Cycle 23Future Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: Cycle 23
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy24.07016.673.7044.44066.6711.11

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response

Best response is defined as the cumulative numbers of participants who achieve each level of best response including PR, VGPR and CR assessed with IMWG Criteria, after each cycle of treatment. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CRVGPRPR
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy23.120.528.2
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy24.417.831.1
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy33.3050.0

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)

RDI for each study drug is defined as 100*(Total amount of dose taken)/(Total prescribed dose of treated cycles), where total prescribed dose equals [dose prescribed at enrollment* number of prescribed doses per cycle* the number of treated cycles]. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercent (Median)
Bortezomib, IxazomibCarfilzomib, IxazomibBortezomib/Carfilzomib, IxazomibLenalidomideDexamethasone
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy71.9387.7083.2447.1848.61

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Study Treatment

OS was defined as the period from the first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I to the time when death (regardless of the cause of death) was confirmed. Participants who were still alive were censored at the last confirmed date of survival or the date of data cut-off, whichever was earlier. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib TherapyNA

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration of Hospital Stay Per Participants

HCRU was calculated from Exposure-adjusted rate of hospitalization events (per participants-months) and the duration of hospitalization among participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II. Duration of hospital stay per participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II was reported. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionDays (Mean)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy14.8
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy19.4
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy18.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of response ≥PR to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. PR and PD will be assessed with IMWG Criteria. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy15.31
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy28.03
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy28.03

[back to top]

Duration of Therapy (DOT)

DOT is defined as the treatment duration of study drug at study treatment Period I. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy14.69
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy12.43
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy12.43

[back to top]

Evaluation of Modified Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)

Modified QALYs was calculated from the score of EORTC QLQ-C30. The health-related quality of life scale score of EORTC QLQ-C30 was converted into a utility value ranging from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health), and used to adjust the value of survival years; this value was assessed as the modified QALY. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionQuality-Adjusted Life-Years (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0.467
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0.534
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy0.518

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Events With Hospitalization Per Participants-Month

HCRU was calculated from Exposure-adjusted rate of hospitalization events (per participants-months) and the duration of hospitalization among participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II. Number of events with hospitalization per participants-month in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II was reported. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionNumber of Events per Participants-Month (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy1.9
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy2.9
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Continuing Treatment With Ixazomib at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment

(NCT03416374)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy50.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy35.9
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy37.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved VGPR or Better (CR + VGPR)

VGPR or better (CR + VGPR) were assessed by IMWG Criteria. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy33.3
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy43.6
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy42.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)

(NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy100.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy59.1
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy64.0

[back to top]

PFS From the Start of Study Treatment

PFS was defined as the period from the first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I to the time of confirmed PD or confirmed death (regardless of the cause of death), whichever is earlier. PFS was assessed by IMWG Criteria. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy28.96
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy28.96

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment

PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and have not had disease progression at 12 months after the date of first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I. PFS was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria (2014 version). Per IMWG criteria, progressive disease (PD): serum M-component increase ≥0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase ≥200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell ≥10%/ development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy50.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy48.7
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy48.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy6
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy35
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy41

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best response of PR or better including stringent complete response (sCR), VGPR and PR assessed with IMWG Criteria, after the start of the study treatment. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy83.3
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy71.8
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy73.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response

Best response is defined as the cumulative numbers of participants who achieve each level of best response including partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR) and complete response (CR) assessed with IMWG Criteria after each cycle of treatment. Per IMWG criteria, PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR: serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum+urine +disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CRVGPRPR
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.08.522.0

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)

RDI is defined as 100*(Total amount of dose taken)/(Total prescribed dose of treated cycles), where total prescribed dose equals [dose prescribed at enrollment* number of prescribed doses per cycle* the number of treated cycles]. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercent (Mean)
IxazomibLenalidomideDexamethasone
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone66.4944.7241.07

[back to top] [back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the future perspective scale, higher score = better perspective of the future. For the body image scale, higher scores = better body image. Higher score for the disease symptoms scale = higher level of symptomatology. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 37 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: End of TreatmentSide-Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide-Effects of Treatment: End of TreatmentBody Image: BaselineBody Image: End of TreatmentFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: End of Treatment
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone19.3311.1117.8016.6728.1816.6742.4933.33

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve VGPR or Better (CR+VGPR)

The percentage of participants of CR + VGPR is defined as the rate of participants who achieve a best response of VGPR or better (sCR, CR, or VGPR) according to the IMWG Criteria after the start of the IRd therapy. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone31.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)

(NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone21.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the period from the start of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) therapy in standard medical care to the time of confirmed progressive disease (PD) or confirmed death (regardless of the cause of death), whichever was earlier. PFS was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria (2014 version). Per IMWG criteria, PD: serum M-component increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase ≥ 200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell ≥ 10%/ development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 Months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone4.79

[back to top] [back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR

Rate of MRD will be calculated by the percentage of participants who are MRD-negative. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
10^-4=< - Max10^-5=< - <10^-410^-6=< - <10^-5Negative
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone26.716.76.750.0

[back to top]

PFS Rate at 12 Months and 24 Months After the Start of Treatment

PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and have not had disease progression at 12 months and 24 months after the date of start of study treatment. PFS was assessed by IMWG Criteria (2014 version). Per IMWG criteria, PD: serum M-component increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase ≥ 200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell ≥ 10%/ development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: 12 months and 24 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone5741

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Continue to Receive Treatment at 12 Months and 24 Months After Start of Treatment

(NCT03433001)
Timeframe: 12 months and 24 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone40.021.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the period from the start of IRd therapy in standard medical care to the time when death (regardless of the cause of death) is confirmed. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.23

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best response of PR or better including stringent complete response (sCR), VGPR and PR assessed with IMWG Criteria, after the start of the study treatment. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone53.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone249

[back to top]

Duration of Therapy (DOT)

DOT is defined as the treatment duration of IRd therapy. (NCT03433001)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months as a maximum

InterventionDays (Mean)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone353.3

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the first dose of any study drug treatment to the date of the first documented PD. PD is defined as increase of 25% of lowest response value in one or more of following criteria: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/dl); or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24-hour); difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dl); or bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute plasma cell percentage ≥10%); development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma; or development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mg21.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as time from date of first dose of drug to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Participant without documentation of PD or death were censored at the date of last response assessment that is stable disease (SD) or better. PD is defined as increase of 25% of lowest response value in one or more of following criteria: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/dl); or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24-hour); difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dl); or bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute plasma cell percentage ≥10%); development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma; or development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. SD is defined as not meeting criteria for other responses. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mg16.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better (Complete Response + VGPR)

Response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. VGPR is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level< 100 milligram (mg) per 24 hours. The percentage of participants were rounded off to the single decimal point. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mg32.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of any study drug treatment to the date of death. Participant without documentation of death at the time of analysis will be censored at the last visit at which s/he was known to be alive. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mgNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR), VGPR and partial response (PR). CR: Negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow; normal free light chain (FLC) ratio of 0.26-1.65; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; and PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90%/to <200 mg/24 hours; In addition, if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; no known evidence of progressive/new bone lesions. The percentage of participants were rounded off to the single decimal point. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mg66.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of the first documented PD among participants who responded to the treatment. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mg24.0

[back to top]

Time To Response (TTR)

TTR is defined as the time from first dose of any study drug treatment to the date of first documentation of PR or better. PR is defined as >=50% reduction of serum M protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90%/to <200 mg/24 hours; In addition, if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; no known evidence of progressive/new bone lesions. (NCT03439293)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off: 1 January 2022 (Approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Daratumumab 16 mg/kg + Dexamethasone 20 mgNA

[back to top]

>= Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Response Percentage With Pembrolizumab Added to Ixazomib Citrate and Dexamethasone

Will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a VGPR, complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) at any time divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success rate will be calculated. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)0

[back to top]

Complete Response Percentage With Pembrolizumab Added to Ixazomib Citrate and Dexamethasone

Will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a CR or sCR at any time divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success rate will be calculated. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)0

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Graded according National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)13

[back to top]

Overall Response Percentage

Defined as a partial response or better noted as the objective status on two consecutive evaluations. The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)0.077

[back to top]

Survival Time

The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT03506360)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Pembrolizumab, and Dexamethasone)1.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity (Dose Escalation)

Number of participants experiencing a dose limiting toxicity to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (NCT03770260)
Timeframe: At Day 28

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experienced a Dose Limiting ToxicityDid Not Experience a Dose Limiting ToxicityWithdrew from Treatment
Dose Level 1030
Dose Level 2031
Dose Level 3010

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria below.~CR = Negative immunofixation on serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow~Stringent CR = Above definition plus normal FLC ration and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by IHC or 2-4 color flow cytometry~PR = At least 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 urinary M-protein by at least 90% or to <200 mg/24 h. If serum and urine M-protein unmeasurable, require at least 50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. If serum free light assay also unmeasurable, require at least 50% reduction in plasma cells, provided baseline was at least 30%~Very Good PR (VGPR) = Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h" (NCT04119336)
Timeframe: up to 8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Nivolumab and Ixazomib0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from starting study treatment to disease progression or death from any cause. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria defines progressive disease (PD) as at least 25% increase from lowest response value of any of the following:~Serum M-component (absolute increase must be at least 0.5 g/dL)~Urine M-component (absolute increase must be at least 200 mg/24 h)~If serum and urine M-protein unmeasurable, absolute increase in free light chain (FLC) must be >10 mg/dL. If FLC levels also unmeasurable, absolute increase in bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be at least 10%.~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas, or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder" (NCT04119336)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Nivolumab and Ixazomib3.96

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Tests Abnormalities

Laboratory tests abnormalities were graded using the CTCAE version 4.03. as: Grade 1 (Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms); Grade 2 (Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated); Grade 3 (Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated); Grade 4 (Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated); Grade 5 (Death related to AE). (NCT04272775)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 29 days after last dose of study drug (up to Cycle 87 Day 44) (Each Cycle length=28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 4: Neutrophils lowGrade 4: Leukocytes lowGrade 4: Lymphocytes lowGrade 4: Platelets lowGrade 4: Sodium lowGrade 4: Potassium lowGrade 3: Neutrophils lowGrade 3: Hemoglobin lowGrade 3: Leukocytes lowGrade 3: Lymphocytes lowGrade 3: Platelets lowGrade 3: Albumin lowGrade 3: Corrected calcium highGrade 3: Sodium lowGrade 3: Potassium lowGrade 3: Phosphate low
Cohort 1: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0033004233010111
Cohort 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone2102112223211001

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), and Partial Response (PR)

Number of participants who achieved CR, PR, VGPR were assessed in accordance to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma. CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio if disease measurable only by SFLC. VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or greater than or equal to (>=) 90% decrease in serum M-protein with urine M-protein <100 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24 hrs). If disease measurable only by SFLC, >= 90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (dFLC). PR: >= 50% reduction of serum M-protein and >= 90% reduction in urine M-protein or to <200 mg/24 hrs, or a >= 50% decrease in dFLC. A >=50% decrease in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas present at baseline (NCT04272775)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 29 days after last dose of study drug (up to Cycle 87 Day 44) (Each Cycle length=28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: Ixazomib 4.0 mg0
Cohort 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

(NCT04272775)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 29 days after last dose of study drug (up to Cycle 87 Day 44) (Each Cycle length=28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: Ixazomib 4.0 mg7
Cohort 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone7

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT:Any following adverse events (AEs) possibly related to ixazomib assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03; Grade 4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia lasting >7 consecutive days; Grade 3/greater neutropenia with fever/infections; Grade 3/greater thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count less than (<)10,000 per cubic meter(/mm^3); Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain/Grade 3 or greater peripheral neuropathy; Grade 3/greater nonhematologic toxicities with exceptions of arthralgia/myalgia, fatigue lasting <7 days manageable nausea/emesis with antiemetic prophylaxis, diarrhea that is controlled with supportive care; treatment delay of >14 days at start of Cycle 2 due to failure of hematologic/nonhematologic recovery; Other Grade 2/greater ixazomib related nonhematologic toxicities required permanent discontinuation of ixazomib;Inability to receive at least 80% of planned lenalidomide doses due to the AEs related to ixazomib. (NCT04272775)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 Day 1 until Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: Ixazomib 4.0 mg1
Cohort 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone1

[back to top] [back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT04272775)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1: pre-dose and at multiple time points (15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes and 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 96, and 168 hours) post-dose (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Cohort 1: Ixazomib 4.0 mg65.368.8
Cohort 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone32.934.5

[back to top]