Page last updated: 2024-10-15

levoleucovorin

Description

Levoleucovorin: A folate analog consisting of the pharmacologically active isomer of LEUCOVORIN. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

(6S)-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid : The pharmacologically active (6S)-stereoisomer of 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID135398559
CHEMBL ID1908841
CHEBI ID63606
SCHEMBL ID571901
SCHEMBL ID16946130
MeSH IDM0544494

Synonyms (76)

Synonym
n-[4-({[(6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-3,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl]methyl}amino)benzoyl]-l-glutamic acid
C03479
5-formyltetrahydrofolate
leucovorin
(6s)-leucovorin
58-05-9
l(-)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid
5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
l-leucovorin
5-formyltetrahydropteroylglutamate
(2s)-2-[[4-[[(6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-1,6,7,8-tetrahydropteridin-6-yl]methylamino]benzoyl]amino]pentanedioic acid
l-glutamic acid, n-(4-((((6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4-oxo-6-pteridinyl)methyl)amino)benzoyl)-
(6s)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid
unii-990s25980y
levo-folinic
levoleucovorin
990s25980y ,
l-glutamic acid, n-(4-(((2-amino-5-formyl-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4-oxo-6-pteridinyl)methyl)amino)benzoyl)-, (s)-
68538-85-2
(s)-leucovorin
(6s)-folinic acid
levofolinic acid
levofolene
l-folinic acid
isovorin
(6s)-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid
CHEBI:63606 ,
n-[4-({[(6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl]methyl}amino)benzoyl]-l-glutamic acid
SCHEMBL571901
(2s)-2-{[4-({[(6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl]methyl}amino)phenyl]formamido}pentanedioic acid
bdbm286
5-cho-h4pteglu1
levoleucovorin [orange book]
levoleucovorin [vandf]
khapzory
lfp-754
levofolinic acid [who-dd]
VVIAGPKUTFNRDU-STQMWFEESA-N
n5-formyl-(6s)-tetrahydrofolic acid
CHEMBL1908841
5-formyltetrahydropteroylglutamic acid
SCHEMBL16946130
DTXSID4023204
n5-formyltetrahydrofolate
l-n-[p-[[(2-amino-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-pteridinyl)methyl]amino]benzoyl]-glutamic acid
(6r,s)-5-formyltetrahydrofolate
n5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
n5-formyl-thf
DB11596
[6s]-5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate; 6s-folinic acid
Q192464
calcium-levofolinate
(s)-2-(4-((((s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-3,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl)methyl)amino)benzamido)pentanedioic acid
A923282
(2s)-2-[[4-[[(6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-3,6,7,8-tetrahydropteridin-6-yl]methylamino]benzoyl]amino]pentanedioic acid
(s)-methyl2-amino-3-n-boc-propanoate
EN300-19768275
CS-0091268
HY-127009
AKOS040752533
6s leucovorin
n-(4-((((6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-3,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl)methyl)amino)benzoyl)-l-glutamic acid
n-(4-((((6s)-2-amino-5-formyl-4-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropteridin-6-yl)methyl)amino)benzoyl)-l-glutamic acid
elvorine, isovorin, levofolene, levorin
leucovorin, (s)-isomer
s leucovorin
6s-leucovorin
acido levofolinico
levo leucovorin
cl-307,782
levo-leucovorin
l-5-formyltetrahydrofolate
6-s-leucovorin
6 s leucovorin
levofolinate
s-leucovorin

Effects

ExcerptReference
"Levoleucovorin has been studied in other cancers."( Levoleucovorin as replacement for leucovorin in cancer treatment.
Chuang, VT; Suno, M, 2012
)

Toxicity

ExcerptReference
" Determination of 48- and 72-h methotrexate concentrations proved to be a valuable method for identifying patients at high risk for toxic side effects."( [High-dose methotrexate therapy in osteogenic sarcoma: plasma pharmakokinetics to predict toxicity (author's transl)].
Bidlingmaier, F; Haas, RJ; Janka, GE; Wiesner, H, 1979
)
" While 10(-5) M MTX was rescued by 10(-3) M leucovorin, rescue of the toxic effect of 10(-4) M MTX by 10(-3) M leucovorin was not observed."( The reversal of methotrexate cytotoxicity to mouse bone marrow cells by leucovorin and nucleosides.
Bull, JM; Chabner, BA; Pinedo, HM; Zaharko, DS, 1976
)
"The rationale for melanoma-specific antitumor agents containing phenolic amines is based in part on the ability of the enzyme tyrosinase to oxidize these prodrugs to toxic intermediates."( Thymidylate synthase as a target enzyme for the melanoma-specific toxicity of 4-S-cysteaminylphenol and N-acetyl-4-S-cysteaminylphenol.
Bloomer, WD; Prezioso, JA; Wang, N, 1992
)
" None of the nonresponders responded to the addition of folinic acid, on the contrary toxicity was increased and 2 toxic deaths were reported."( Continuous 24-hour infusion of folinic acid does not increase the response rate of 5-fluorouracil but only the toxicity.
Karvounis, N; Kosmidis, P; Tsavaris, N; Tzannou, I, 1992
)
" There are few reports of such toxic effects during therapy for ALL."( Unexpected acute neurologic toxicity in the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Bowman, WP; Buchanan, GR; Jacaruso, D; Kamen, BA; Roach, ES; Rollins, N; Winick, NJ, 1992
)
"This report describes these toxic effects and outlines our successful approach to the problem."( Unexpected acute neurologic toxicity in the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Bowman, WP; Buchanan, GR; Jacaruso, D; Kamen, BA; Roach, ES; Rollins, N; Winick, NJ, 1992
)
" The publication of cases of overdoses may provide useful information on the causes of the mistakes, on drug-induced toxic effects, and on salvage therapy."( Overdose of vinblastine in a child with Langerhans' cell histiocytosis: toxicity and salvage therapy.
Conter, V; Corbetta, A; D'Angelo, P; Fraschini, D; Jankovic, M; Masera, G; Pacheco, C; Rabbone, ML,
)
" In the phase I part we found that the main side-effect in 27 evaluable patients (pts) was gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly in the form of nausea/vomiting (92%) and diarrhea (70%) which caused one therapy-related death."( A phase I-II study on the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of 5-fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin and cisplatinum in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Borsellino, N; Gebbia, N; Gebbia, V; Palmeri, S; Rausa, L; Russo, A; Rustum, Y, 1990
)
" Previously reported unpredictable and severe toxic effects were probably due to an interaction between methotrexate and nitrous oxide used in anesthesia."( On the safety of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer.
, 1988
)
" The procedure described allows the safe administration of HDMTX-CFR at the 50-g range to adults with advanced malignant solid tumors."( The safety of administration of massive doses of methotrexate (50 g) with equimolar citrovorum factor rescue in adult patients.
Djerassi, I; Reggev, A, 1988
)
" Unpredictable and severe toxic effects were significantly more common in patients aged greater than or equal to 50 who had received at least 80% of the full chemotherapy dose and in patients who had received chemotherapy within 6 h of mastectomy than in other patients."( Toxic effects of early adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
, 1983
)
" We found that MTX-CF is the least toxic single agent chemotherapeutic regimen in the management of GTN."( Methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue: reduced chemotherapy toxicity in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms.
Berkowitz, RS; Bernstein, MR; Goldstein, DP; Jones, MA; Marean, AR, 1980
)
" The 3 patients with mild toxicity had low drug clearance, but others with similar low MTX clearance experienced no apparent toxic effects beyond the expected transient nausea."( High-dose methotrexate with a safe rescue program.
Decker, DA; Edmonson, JH; Gilchrist, GS; Kovach, JS; Offord, JR; Taylor, WF, 1981
)
" In an attempt to reduce the duration of toxic effects in our patient, leucovorin was administered 24 hours after the overdose."( Massive vincristine overdose: failure of leucovorin to reduce toxicity.
Braat, PC; Goudsmit, R; Somers, R; Thomas, LL, 1982
)
" The most common adverse reactions are acute gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression while neurological, ocular and dermatological toxicities are unusual."( Dermatological toxicity from chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil.
Campanella, GA; Carrieri, G; Colucci, G; Leo, S; Tatulli, C; Taveri, R, 1994
)
" Adverse experiences were generally mild or moderate and occurred in 54 (60%) of 90 courses of l-leucovorin therapy."( Safety and efficacy of l-leucovorin rescue following high-dose methotrexate for osteosarcoma.
George, M; Goorin, A; Letvak, LA; Link, M; Poplack, D; Strother, D, 1995
)
"We studied the levamisole toxic effects in adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer."( [Toxicity of levamisole in adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer].
Beerblock, K; de Gramont, A; Demuynck, B; Grangé, JD; Krulik, M; Louvet, C; Navarro-Carola, E; Soubrane, D; Varette, C, 1993
)
"Clinical response to chemotherapy and observed toxic effects during chemotherapy."( Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Increased toxicity without improved response in squamous cell head and neck cancer.
Bajorin, D; Bosl, G; Harrison, L; Louison, C; Motzer, R; Pfister, DG; Scher, H; Shah, J; Strong, E, 1994
)
" Other significant toxic effects included grade 3 to 4 mucositis in eight patients and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 10."( Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Increased toxicity without improved response in squamous cell head and neck cancer.
Bajorin, D; Bosl, G; Harrison, L; Louison, C; Motzer, R; Pfister, DG; Scher, H; Shah, J; Strong, E, 1994
)
" Its use can be associated with significant toxic effects."( Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Increased toxicity without improved response in squamous cell head and neck cancer.
Bajorin, D; Bosl, G; Harrison, L; Louison, C; Motzer, R; Pfister, DG; Scher, H; Shah, J; Strong, E, 1994
)
" Therefore toxic potentiation of 5-FU due to simultaneous 1-LV dosing is presumed to be concerned with an increased ternary complex (FdUMP-TS-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate) formation and a greater extent of TS inhibition."( Effects of levofolinate calcium on subacute intravenous toxicity of 5-fluorouracil in rats.
Fujii, H; Ichimura, A; Murakami, Y; Murata, A; Takagi, H; Tauchi, K; Yamashita, N, 1998
)
" Other toxic manifestations included mucositis of varying degrees, diarrhea, and neutropenic fever, but all patients recovered."( High-dose leucovorin as sole therapy for methotrexate toxicity.
Flombaum, CD; Meyers, PA, 1999
)
"The aim of this study was to clarify whether preoperative chemotherapy caused adverse effects on the perioperative course of patients undergoing esophagectomy."( Does preoperative chemotherapy cause adverse effects on the perioperative course of patients undergoing esophagectomy for carcinoma?
Aikou, T; Baba, M; Fukumoto, T; Kusano, C; Nakano, S; Natsugoe, S; Shimada, M; Shirao, K, 1999
)
" 5-Fu+LVLD is significantly more toxic than the other two regimens in terms of neutropenia, mucositis and diarrhea."( Retrospective evaluation of toxicity in three different schedules of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected colorectal cancer. TTD Spanish Cooperative Group.
Alonso, MC; Antón, A; Aranda, E; Camps, C; Checa, T; Díaz-Rubio, E; Fonseca, E; Gallen, M; Navarro, M; Sastre, J,
)
" To predict 5-FU catabolic deficiencies and toxic side effects, we conducted a prospective study of patients treated for advanced colorectal cancer by high-dose 5-FU."( Correlation between uracil and dihydrouracil plasma ratio, fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetic parameters, and tolerance in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A potential interest for predicting 5-FU toxicity and determining optimal 5-FU dosage.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Delva, R; Gamelin, E; Genevieve, F; Guérin-Meyer, V; Ifrah, N; Larra, F; Lortholary, A; Robert, J, 1999
)
" Forty-seven patients (35%+/-8%) experienced significant toxicity and were unable to receive the second cycle as scheduled: 76% required dose reduction, 11% discontinued therapy (including two toxic deaths), 11% discontinued therapy during the first cycle, and 2% required dose delay."( Standard dose (Mayo regimen) 5-fluorouracil and low dose folinic acid: prohibitive toxicity?
Griffeth, S; Keith, B; Kocha, W; Sawyer, M; Stitt, L; Taylor, M; Tomiak, A; Vincent, M; Whiston, F; Winquist, E, 2000
)
" Haematologic side effects could not be analyzed, since details of each haematologic side effect by patients were not provided."( Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis.
Moher, D; Ortiz, Z; Shea, B; Suarez Almazor, M; Tugwell, P; Wells, G, 2000
)
" Some studies have been proven it to be safe for outpatient treatment and to have significant antitumor activity in colorectal and breast cancer patients."( [Capecitabine--a review of its antitumor activity and toxicity in clinical studies].
Maeda, Y; Sasaki, T, 2000
)
"Methotrexate can influence the central nervous system through several metabolic toxic pathways."( Methotrexate treatment protocols and the central nervous system: significant cure with significant neurotoxicity.
Aviner, S; Cohen, IJ; Goshen, Y; Kornreich, L; Shuper, A; Stark, B; Stein, J; Steinmetz, A; Yaniv, I, 2000
)
" Treatment dosages were adjusted if toxic events above WHO grade 2 occurred."( Toxicity and effects of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: results of the German prospective, controlled randomized multicenter trial FOGT-1.
Beger, HG; Link, KH; Staib, L,
)
"To study the effect of folates on discontinuation of methotrexate (MTX) as single-drug antirheumatic treatment due to toxicity, to determine which type of adverse events are reduced, to study the effects on the efficacy of MTX, and to compare folic with folinic acid supplementation in a 48-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial."( Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Breedveld, FC; de Boo, TM; de Rooij, DJ; Dijkmans, BA; Hartman, M; Huizinga, TW; Jacobs, MJ; Krabbe, PF; Laan, RF; Romme, TC; Rood, MJ; Severens, JL; van de Laar, MA; van de Putte, LB; van Denderen, CJ; van der Wilt, GJ; van Ede, AE; Westgeest, TA, 2001
)
" The primary end point was MTX withdrawal because of adverse events."( Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Breedveld, FC; de Boo, TM; de Rooij, DJ; Dijkmans, BA; Hartman, M; Huizinga, TW; Jacobs, MJ; Krabbe, PF; Laan, RF; Romme, TC; Rood, MJ; Severens, JL; van de Laar, MA; van de Putte, LB; van Denderen, CJ; van der Wilt, GJ; van Ede, AE; Westgeest, TA, 2001
)
" No between-group differences were found in the frequency of other adverse events or in the duration of adverse events."( Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Breedveld, FC; de Boo, TM; de Rooij, DJ; Dijkmans, BA; Hartman, M; Huizinga, TW; Jacobs, MJ; Krabbe, PF; Laan, RF; Romme, TC; Rood, MJ; Severens, JL; van de Laar, MA; van de Putte, LB; van Denderen, CJ; van der Wilt, GJ; van Ede, AE; Westgeest, TA, 2001
)
" Folates seem to have no effect on the incidence, severity, and duration of other adverse events, including gastrointestinal and mucosal side effects."( Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Breedveld, FC; de Boo, TM; de Rooij, DJ; Dijkmans, BA; Hartman, M; Huizinga, TW; Jacobs, MJ; Krabbe, PF; Laan, RF; Romme, TC; Rood, MJ; Severens, JL; van de Laar, MA; van de Putte, LB; van Denderen, CJ; van der Wilt, GJ; van Ede, AE; Westgeest, TA, 2001
)
" This is the first report of non-invasive monitoring of toxic 5-FU metabolites in normal human tissues."( Issues of normal tissue toxicity in patient and animal studies--effect of carbogen breathing in rats after 5-fluorouracil treatment.
Griffiths, JR; Howe, FA; Lofts, F; McIntyre, DJ; McSheehy, PM; Nicholson, G; Noordhuis, P; Peters, GJ; Price, NM; Rodrigues, LM; Smid, K; Stubbs, M; Wadsworth, P, 2001
)
" The severity of adverse events was associated with increased 5-FU/5-FDHU AUC ratio and reduced 5-FU CL, while 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics were not related to DPD activity."( Relationship between 5-fluorouracil disposition, toxicity and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in cancer patients.
Allegrini, G; Bocci, G; Cionini, L; Conte, PF; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Masi, G; Mini, E; Vannozzi, F, 2001
)
" All patients in the capecitabine group received a starting dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily and the majority (66%) did not require dose modification for adverse events."( First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Bajetta, E; Boyer, M; Bugat, R; Burger, U; Cassidy, J; Garin, A; Graeven, U; Hoff, P; Maroun, J; Marshall, J; McKendric, J; Osterwalder, B; Pérez-Manga, G; Rosso, R; Rougier, P; Schilsky, RL; Twelves, C; Van Cutsem, E, 2002
)
" Analysis of data from two large phase III trials demonstrates that efficacy is not compromised in patients requiring a dose reduction for adverse events."( First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Bajetta, E; Boyer, M; Bugat, R; Burger, U; Cassidy, J; Garin, A; Graeven, U; Hoff, P; Maroun, J; Marshall, J; McKendric, J; Osterwalder, B; Pérez-Manga, G; Rosso, R; Rougier, P; Schilsky, RL; Twelves, C; Van Cutsem, E, 2002
)
"Exclusive CRT approach is not safe to treat patients with low infiltrative rectal carcinoma."( Chemoradiation instead of surgery to treat mid and low rectal tumors: is it safe?
David Filho, WJ; de O Ferreira, F; Ferrigno, R; Lopes, A; Nakagawa, WT; Nishimoto, IN; Rossi, BM; Vieira, RA, 2002
)
" Female patients exhibited a higher incidence of severe toxicity (18%) and toxic death (4/105) than did male patients (9% and 1/138, respectively)."( Severe toxicity related to the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination (the Mayo Clinic regimen): a prospective study in colorectal cancer patients.
Bar-Sela, G; Beny, A; Haim, N; Tsalic, M; Visel, B, 2003
)
" We investigated the therapeutic and adverse drug reaction of intensive chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP), 5-FU and dl-leucovorin (LV) (PFL-therapy), which may be producing dual biochemical modulation effect of 5-FU for advanced colorectal carcinoma."( Investigation into the usefulness and adverse events of CDDP, 5-fU and dl-leucovorin (PFL-therapy) for advanced colorectal cancer.
Arai, T; Fukahara, T; Ishikawa, T; Iwai, T; Kuwabara, H; Maruyama, S; Murase, N; Okabe, S; Ootsukasa, S; Tanami, H; Udagawa, M; Yamashita, H, 2002
)
"Weekly treatment at these doses is convenient and well-tolerated for the large majority of patients, and achieves DI comparable with the 5 days a month QUASAR schedule and other more toxic standard regimens."( Weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: achieving lower toxicity with higher dose-intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer resection.
Anthoney, DA; Crellin, AM; Messruther, J; Patel, K; Sebag-Montefiore, D; Seymour, MT, 2004
)
" The safe minimum dose of folinic acid can be defined in terms of the dose of methotrexate given; the time to start of rescue is probably less important."( Defining the appropriate dosage of folinic acid after high-dose methotrexate for childhood acute lymphatic leukemia that will prevent neurotoxicity without rescuing malignant cells in the central nervous system.
Cohen, IJ, 2004
)
"3%), no toxic death, and only one grade 3 neutropenia (4."( Postoperative chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: can LV5FU2 reduce the toxic effects of the MacDonald regimen? A report on 23 patients.
Artru, P; Atlan, D; Bouché, O; Dahan, L; Lledo, G; Mitry, E; Nguyen, T; Richard, K; Ries, P; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF, 2005
)
" This study was to explore relationship of DPD to serum concentration of 5-FU in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOX6 regimen, and their correlation to treatment response and adverse events."( [Relationship of serum level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and serum concentration of 5-fluorouracil to treatment response and adverse events in colorectal cancer patients].
Dong, QM; He, YJ; Li, S; Li, YY; Xia, ZJ; Zhang, L; Zhou, ZM; Zhou, ZW, 2005
)
" Treatment response and adverse events in the patients were assessed."( [Relationship of serum level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and serum concentration of 5-fluorouracil to treatment response and adverse events in colorectal cancer patients].
Dong, QM; He, YJ; Li, S; Li, YY; Xia, ZJ; Zhang, L; Zhou, ZM; Zhou, ZW, 2005
)
" The predictability of neurotoxicity associated with oxaliplatin-based therapy should allow patients and doctors to develop strategies to manage this side effect in view of the individual patient's clinical situation."( Clinical management of oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity.
Grothey, A, 2005
)
" Adverse effects, including bone marrow suppression, liver damage, renal damage, and glucose tolerance, were evaluated daily during 3 courses of l-LV/5FU-modified RPMI regimen adjuvant chemotherapy for 22 patients with stage III colorectal cancer."( Toxicity during l-LV/5FU adjuvant chemotherapy as a modified RPMI regimen for patients with colorectal cancer.
Arii, K; Higashiguchi, T; Hotta, T; Matsuda, K; Oku, Y; Takifuji, K; Tominaga, T; Yamaue, H; Yokoyama, S, 2005
)
" These data suggest that 5-FU/l-LV can be given in the outpatient and yields improved prognosis and minimal adverse reactions even in patients in reduced dose or prolonged interval."( [Retrospective analysis on efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-leucovorin (l-LV) in advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer].
Chiba, N; Ishioka, C; Kakudo, Y; Kato, S; Ohori, H; Otsuka, K; Sakayori, M; Shibata, H; Takahashi, M; Takahashi, S; Yamaura, G; Yasuda, K; Yoshioka, T, 2005
)
" There was one toxic death."( Activity and toxicity of oxaliplatin and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated colorectal cancer patients: a phase II study.
Buccilli, A; Ciccarese, M; Ferraresi, V; Gabriele, A; Gamucci, T; Giampaolo, MA; Giannarelli, D; Mansueto, G, 2005
)
" Adverse effects associated with the Saltz regimen included diarrhea and neutropenia."( Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bricarello, A; Christian, BJ; Gaudreault, J; Mounho, B; Shiu, V; Zuch, CL,
)
" During the whole study period, the common grade 3/4 adverse events were acne-like rash (38%) and diarrhea (29%)."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
"Addition of cetuximab to weekly infusional 5-FU/FA plus irinotecan is safe and first data suggest a promising activity."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
" The most frequent common adverse events were nausea, Grades 1 - 2 in 13 patients (81."( Chronomodulated chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-FU and sodium folinate in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients: original analysis of non-hematological toxicity and patient characteristics in a pilot investigation.
Farker, K; Hippius, M; Höffken, K; Hoffmann, A; Merkel, U; Wedding, U, 2006
)
"Pharmacokinetics and non-hematological adverse events could be assessed in all patients included in the study."( Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and non-hematological toxicity in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with chronomodulated oxaliplatin, 5-FU and sodium folinate in a pilot investigation.
Farker, K; Hippius, M; Höffken, K; Hoffmann, A; Merkel, U; Roskos, M; Wedding, U, 2006
)
" Our data suggest that GSTT1-null is associated with a greater probability of developing toxicity to 5-Fu/CPT-11/Lv treatments, indicating a potential application of this genetic analysis in predicting adverse effects of this regimen."( Potential application of GSTT1-null genotype in predicting toxicity associated to 5-fluouracil irinotecan and leucovorin regimen in advanced stage colorectal cancer patients.
Aranda, E; Bandres, E; De la Haba, J; Garcia, F; García-Foncillas, J; Gómez, A; Huarriz, M; Morales, R; Romero, RZ, 2006
)
" End points included grade > or = 3 adverse events, response rate (in advanced disease), progression or relapse-free survival, dose-intensity, and overall survival in the studies with mature survival data."( Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
Andre, T; Bleiberg, H; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Green, E; Rothenberg, ML; Sargent, DJ; Tabah-Fisch, I; Tournigand, C, 2006
)
" Older age was not associated with increased rates of severe neurologic adverse events, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, infection, overall incidence of grade > or = 3 toxicity (63% v 67%; P = ."( Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
Andre, T; Bleiberg, H; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Green, E; Rothenberg, ML; Sargent, DJ; Tabah-Fisch, I; Tournigand, C, 2006
)
" This study was to explore the relationship between activity of DPD and concentration of 5-FU, and their correlation to adverse events among advanced gastric cancer patients treated with the same regimen containing 5-FU continuous infusion."( [Correlative analysis between serum dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, activity, concentration of 5-fluorouracil and adverse events in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients].
Cao, Y; Dong, QM; Jiang, WQ; Li, H; Li, S; Peng, RJ; Shi, YX; Yuan, ZY; Zhou, ZM, 2006
)
" Adverse events were assessed every cycle."( [Correlative analysis between serum dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, activity, concentration of 5-fluorouracil and adverse events in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients].
Cao, Y; Dong, QM; Jiang, WQ; Li, H; Li, S; Peng, RJ; Shi, YX; Yuan, ZY; Zhou, ZM, 2006
)
" And high level of 5-FU concentration led to the increase of adverse events."( [Correlative analysis between serum dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, activity, concentration of 5-fluorouracil and adverse events in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients].
Cao, Y; Dong, QM; Jiang, WQ; Li, H; Li, S; Peng, RJ; Shi, YX; Yuan, ZY; Zhou, ZM, 2006
)
"This concurrent chemoradiotherapy with PFML was safe and well tolerated."( Analysis of efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML) and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Katori, H; Taguchi, T; Tsukuda, M, 2007
)
" Most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred at similar rates in both treatment arms."( Phase III trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: a planned safety analysis in 1,864 patients.
Cartwright, T; de Braud, F; Figer, A; Haller, DG; Hill, M; Lim, R; Maroun, J; McKendrick, J; Nowacki, MP; Park, YS; Price, T; Schmoll, HJ; Sirzén, F; Soler-Gonzalez, G; Tabernero, J; Topham, C; Van Cutsem, E, 2007
)
"Neurotoxicity was recorded for all patients using standard adverse event reporting."( Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: NSABP C-07.
Bearden, JD; Cecchini, RS; Cella, D; Colangelo, LH; Colman, LK; Costantino, JP; Ganz, PA; Kopec, JA; Kuebler, JP; Land, SR; Lanier, KS; Murphy, K; Needles, BM; O'Connell, MJ; Pajon, ER; Seay, TE; Smith, RE; Wieand, HS; Wolmark, N, 2007
)
" The relation between adverse events on IROX to selected characteristics was analyzed."( Updated efficacy and toxicity analysis of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX) : intergroup trial N9741 in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alberts, SR; Ashley, AC; Campbell, ME; Findlay, BP; Fuchs, CS; Goldberg, RM; Grothey, A; Morton, RF; Pitot, HC; Ramanathan, RK; Sargent, DJ; Williamson, SK, 2007
)
" Fifty-two percent of patients required dose reductions for adverse events, and 26% experienced 119 hospitalizations related to complications of treatment or their disease, with 5 treatment-related deaths."( Updated efficacy and toxicity analysis of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX) : intergroup trial N9741 in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alberts, SR; Ashley, AC; Campbell, ME; Findlay, BP; Fuchs, CS; Goldberg, RM; Grothey, A; Morton, RF; Pitot, HC; Ramanathan, RK; Sargent, DJ; Williamson, SK, 2007
)
" We have applied goshajinkigan (TJ 107) for a case of advanced colon cancer with mFOLFOX 6, and experienced a reduction in numbness, the adverse effect of LOHP."( [A case of neurotoxicity reduced with goshajinkigan in modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy for advanced colon cancer].
Chisato, N; Ebisawa, Y; Kono, T; Mamiya, K; Mamiya, N; Satomi, M, 2007
)
"5% of the functional volume of both kidneys appears to be safe at a median follow-up of 2 years for a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 administered before and after simultaneous 5-FU and radiotherapy."( Renal toxicity of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in gastric cancer.
Belka, C; Bokemeyer, C; Budach, W; Hehr, T; Kollmannsberger, C; Welz, S, 2007
)
"Cetuximab-based combination chemotherapy (CBCC) proved safe and effective as second-line strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Safety and efficacy of cetuximab-chemotherapy combination in Saudi patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Al-Gahmi, AM; Bahadur, YA; Fawzi, EE; Ibrahim, EM; Sallam, YA; Zeeneldin, AA,
)
" Administration of TroVax alongside chemotherapy was safe and well tolerated with no SAEs attributed to the vaccine and no enhancement of chemo-related toxicity."( Vaccination of colorectal cancer patients with TroVax given alongside chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, leukovorin and irinotecan) is safe and induces potent immune responses.
Carroll, MW; Chikoti, P; Drury, N; Griffiths, R; Harrop, R; Hawkins, RE; Kingsman, SM; Naylor, S; Redchenko, I; Shingler, W; Steven, N, 2008
)
"An increase of sIL-2R, CD4+CD25+ T-cells and the CD4/8 ratio in patients with symptomatic adverse reactions were found."( Changes of immunological parameters reflect quality of life-related toxicity during chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Aizawa, M; Fujimoto, T; Itagaki, H; Kobayashi, R; Kuhara, K; Ogawa, K; Osawa, G; Otani, T; Yokomizo, H; Yoshimatsu, K,
)
" Evaluation points included adverse events, dose intensity, response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival."( Safety of irinotecan and infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in Japan: a retrospective review of 48 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Asaka, M; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Hamamoto, Y; Minashi, K; Muto, M; Ohtsu, A; Tahara, M; Yano, T; Yoshida, S, 2008
)
" We observed adverse events, time to treatment failure, response rate, reason to discontinue treatment, and dose intensity."( [Safety and efficacy analysis of FOLFOX4 regimen in elderly compared to younger colorectal cancer patients].
Chin, K; Hatake, K; Ichimura, T; Kuboki, Y; Matsuda, M; Matsuzaka, S; Mizunuma, N; Ogura, M; Shinozaki, E; Suenaga, M, 2008
)
"After 40 of the planned 74 patients had been randomly assigned, real-time adverse event monitoring led to early trial closure because of excess sequence-specific toxicity."( Severe sequence-specific toxicity when capecitabine is given after Fluorouracil and leucovorin.
Anthoney, DA; Bradley, C; Brown, JM; Brown, S; Crawford, SM; Hennig, IM; Jackson, DP; Melcher, AM; Naik, JD; Seymour, MT; Szubert, A, 2008
)
" Incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events during the first 12 weeks of treatment were 59%, 36%, and 67% for mFOLFOX6, bFOL, and CapeOx, respectively, (TREE-1) and 59%, 51%, and 56% for the corresponding treatments plus bevacizumab (TREE-2; primary end point)."( Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study.
Abubakr, Y; Childs, BH; Cohn, AL; Fehrenbacher, L; Hainsworth, JD; Hart, LL; Hedrick, E; Hochster, HS; Ramanathan, RK; Saif, MW; Schwartzberg, L; Wong, L, 2008
)
" The secondary aim was to evaluate whether distal bowel clearance < or =1 cm is safe after radiation."( Distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe?
Bujko, K; Chmielik, E; Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A; Nowacki, MP; Rutkowski, A; Wojnar, A, 2008
)
"For advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, FOLFOX4/mFOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI may be effective and comparatively safe treatments."( Efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil, leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4 and modified FOLFOX6) followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin plus irinotecan(FOLFIRI)for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer--case studies.
Adachi, K; Arimoto, Y; Kanamiya, Y; Nakamura, R; Nishio, K; Oba, H; Ohtani, H; Shintani, M; Yui, S, 2008
)
"Supplementation with folic acid is an effective measure to reduce hepatic adverse effects associated with methotrexate treatment."( Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on methotrexate-associated safety and efficacy in inflammatory disease: a systematic review.
Paul, C; Prey, S, 2009
)
" In addition, relative dose intensity (RDI), therapeutic efficacy, and adverse events in the patients who were given the regimen, we compared between the groups."( [Efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX6 regimen in aged patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer].
Inoue, N; Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Ishiguro, T; Kuwabara, K; Matsuki, M; Miyazaki, T; Okada, N; Sano, M; Yokoyama, M, 2008
)
" The rate of adverse events ( > or = grade 3) was not different between the groups ( 50% versus 51%)."( [Efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX6 regimen in aged patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer].
Inoue, N; Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Ishiguro, T; Kuwabara, K; Matsuki, M; Miyazaki, T; Okada, N; Sano, M; Yokoyama, M, 2008
)
"Similar to younger patients the mFOLFOX6 regimen is feasible, safe and effective in the selected aged patients, although the dose reduction may be needed for such patients."( [Efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX6 regimen in aged patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer].
Inoue, N; Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Ishiguro, T; Kuwabara, K; Matsuki, M; Miyazaki, T; Okada, N; Sano, M; Yokoyama, M, 2008
)
" Major adverse events were neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea, hand/foot syndrome, and neurotoxicity."( Efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.
Hatzopoulos, A; Heras, P; Karagiannis, S; Kritikos, K; Kritikos, N; Mitsibounas, D; Xourafas, V,
)
" Serious/grade 3-5 adverse events of interest for bevacizumab included bleeding (3%), gastrointestinal perforation (2%), arterial thromboembolism (1%), hypertension (5."( Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study.
Berry, S; Bridgewater, J; Canon, JL; Cunningham, D; DiBartolomeo, M; Georgoulias, V; Kretzschmar, A; Mazier, MA; Michael, M; Peeters, M; Rivera, F; Van Cutsem, E, 2009
)
" Follow-up for potential delayed adverse effects and efficacy is ongoing."( Initial safety report of NSABP C-08: A randomized phase III study of modified FOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab for the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.
Allegra, CJ; Atkins, JN; Azar, CA; Chu, L; Colangelo, LH; Fehrenbacher, L; Goldberg, RM; Lopa, SH; O'Connell, MJ; O'Reilly, S; Petrelli, NJ; Seay, TE; Sharif, S; Wolmark, N; Yothers, G, 2009
)
" Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were leukocytopenia in four patients, and neutropenia in 12 patients, while non-hematological toxicities such as nausea, anorexia and sensory neuropathy occurred in only one patient each adverse event."( The efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOX regimen (a combination of leucovorin and fluorouracil with oxaliplatin) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hattori, M; Honda, I; Kato, N; Kobayashi, D; Matsushita, H; Okochi, O; Tsuboi, K, 2009
)
" The most frequent adverse reactions were peripheral neuropathy (82 %), neutropenia (56."( [Therapeutic use and profile of toxicity of the FOLFOX4 regimen].
de la Rubia, A; Díaz-Carrasco, MS; Fernández-Lobato, B; Marín, M; Pareja, A; Vila, N,
)
" Docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is effective, but highly toxic regimen for advanced cases."( The efficacy and safety of reduced-dose docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of advanced stage gastric adenocarcinoma.
Abali, H; Budakoglu, B; Güler, T; Odabaşi, H; Oksüzoğlu, B; Ozdemir, NY; Uncu, D; Zengin, N, 2010
)
" An increase of adverse events with combination chemotherapy is predicted in elderly patients, and it remains controversial whether they should receive the same chemotherapy as younger patients."( Multicenter safety study of mFOLFOX6 for unresectable advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer in elderly patients.
Ikeguchi, M; Kanazawa, A; Katano, K; Kidani, A; Makino, M; Ozaki, N; Sugimoto, S; Takeda, H; Tanaka, T; Yoshimura, H, 2009
)
" Adverse events and the response to treatment were compared between the elderly and non-elderly groups."( Multicenter safety study of mFOLFOX6 for unresectable advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer in elderly patients.
Ikeguchi, M; Kanazawa, A; Katano, K; Kidani, A; Makino, M; Ozaki, N; Sugimoto, S; Takeda, H; Tanaka, T; Yoshimura, H, 2009
)
"The main adverse events were neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, which occurred in 62."( Multicenter safety study of mFOLFOX6 for unresectable advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer in elderly patients.
Ikeguchi, M; Kanazawa, A; Katano, K; Kidani, A; Makino, M; Ozaki, N; Sugimoto, S; Takeda, H; Tanaka, T; Yoshimura, H, 2009
)
" The primary dose of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) ranged from 60 mg/m(2) to 85 mg/m(2), and adverse reactions and serum platinum concentration were monitored."( [The pharmacokinetics and safety of oxaliplatin in a hemodialysis patient treated with mFOLFOX6 therapy].
Fujita, M; Kataoka, Y; Katayama, T; Koide, T; Matsuda, H; Okuda, M; Yamagishi, Y, 2009
)
"EP-UFT with lower UFT doses and without leucovorin support is a safe and effective regimen as first -line treatment of MGC."( Efficacy and toxicity of lower dose UFT without leucovorin in metastatic gastric cancer patients.
Alacacioglu, A; Meydan, N; Oztop, I; Somali, I; Tarhan, MO; Yilmaz, U,
)
" The patient tolerated glucarpidase well without any significant adverse events."( Glucarpidase rescue in a patient with high-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity.
Al Omar, S; Tuffaha, HW, 2011
)
"Glucarpidase is a safe and effective agent in the management of high-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity and delayed methotrexate elimination."( Glucarpidase rescue in a patient with high-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity.
Al Omar, S; Tuffaha, HW, 2011
)
"We retrospectively investigated the frequency and severity of adverse events in 124 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated by mFOLFOX6 regimen from August, 2005 to December, 2006."( [Revision of the informed consent form for patients based on investigation of adverse events of mFOLFOX6 regimen].
Boku, N; Kato, T; Kimura, H; Kudou, Y; Matsunaga, Y; Motokawa, S; Muramatsu, T; Nagata, N; Nakagaki, S; Ohashi, Y; Shino, M; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, T, 2009
)
" The primary toxicity outcome measure was toxicity-induced delay or dose reduction; the secondary outcome was Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade >or= 3 toxicity."( Association of molecular markers with toxicity outcomes in a randomized trial of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: the FOCUS trial.
Adlard, JW; Allan, JM; Braun, MS; Daly, CL; Meade, AM; Parmar, MK; Quirke, P; Richman, SD; Seymour, MT; Thompson, L, 2009
)
" Several forms of folate appear to be safe and efficacious in some individuals with major depressive disorder, but more information is needed about dosage and populations most suited to folate therapy."( Folate in depression: efficacy, safety, differences in formulations, and clinical issues.
Fava, M; Mischoulon, D, 2009
)
"FOLFOXIRI confers significant benefit in progression-free survival, survival, response and R0 resection rates but is more toxic compared with FOLFIRI."( A systematic review of FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: improved efficacy at the cost of increased toxicity.
Chiriatti, A; Fiorentini, G; Francini, G; Montagnani, F; Turrisi, G, 2011
)
" Adverse events resulting from its use include gastrointestinal perforation, wound-healing complications, hemorrhage, and arterial thromboembolism."( Fournier's gangrene as a possible side effect of bevacizumab therapy for resected colorectal cancer.
Gamboa, EO; Haller, N; Rehmus, EH, 2010
)
" The incidence of adverse drug reactions was not significantly different between the two groups, although the incidence rates of adverse events associated predominantly with 5-fluorouracil such as hand-and-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and oral mucositis were rather higher, though not significantly, in generic drug group than in brand drug group (16 vs."( Evaluation of efficacy and safety of generic levofolinate in patients who received colorectal cancer chemotherapy.
Fujii, H; Iihara, H; Itoh, Y; Matsuura, K; Takahashi, T; Yasuda, K; Yoshida, K, 2011
)
"The addition of cetuximab to chronotherapy allowed safe and effective therapeutic control of metastases, including their complete resection, despite previous failure of several treatment regimens."( Cetuximab and circadian chronomodulated chemotherapy as salvage treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): safety, efficacy and improved secondary surgical resectability.
Adam, R; Bouchahda, M; Giacchetti, S; Gorden, L; Guettier, C; Hauteville, D; Innominato, PF; Karaboué, A; Lévi, F; Saffroy, R, 2011
)
" 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and adverse events as end points were compared between the two groups."( [Efficacy and toxicity analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer].
Fang, F; Li, DC; Lu, GC, 2010
)
" There was no significant difference for 3-year DFS and all grades adverse events between the two groups."( [Efficacy and toxicity analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer].
Fang, F; Li, DC; Lu, GC, 2010
)
" No hematologic or non-hematologic toxic effects were clearly related to UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 during the first cycle or throughout the entire course of chemotherapy."( UGT1A1*1/*28 and *1/*6 genotypes have no effects on the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Akiyama, Y; Ando, Y; Araki, K; Fujita, K; Hirose, T; Ichikawa, W; Ishida, H; Kawara, K; Miwa, K; Miya, T; Mizuno, K; Nagashima, F; Narabayashi, M; Saji, S; Sasaki, Y; Sunakawa, Y; Yamamoto, W; Yamashita, K, 2011
)
" A protocol-defined prohibitive adverse event occurred in 4 patients (6%), including 2 treatment-associated deaths."( Cetuximab is associated with excessive toxicity when combined with bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Chen, HX; Christos, P; Hamilton, A; Horvath, L; Kindler, HL; Matulich, D; Ocean, AJ; Polite, B; Sparano, JA, 2010
)
" The incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events and grade 2 or greater histopathological sinusoidal injury were significantly higher in the SVI ≥ +30% than in the SVI < +30% group."( Splenomegaly in FOLFOX-naïve stage IV or recurrent colorectal cancer patients due to chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity can be predicted by the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio before chemotherapy.
Arai, T; Kobayashi, S; Koike, J; Koizumi, S; Makizumi, R; Miura, K; Miyajima, N; Nakano, H; Otsubo, T; Sakurai, J; Shimamura, T; Yamada, K, 2011
)
" Adverse events were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events."( Retrospective cohort study on the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: the HGCSG0801 study.
Asaka, M; Hatanaka, K; Hosokawa, A; Iwanaga, I; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kusumi, T; Miyagishima, T; Nakamura, M; Sakata, Y; Sogabe, S; Yuki, S, 2011
)
" We investigated whether there might be a discrepancy between the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) and the Neurotoxicity Criteria of Debiopharm (DEB-NTC), the commonly used oxaliplatin-specific scales, in the evaluation of peripheral neurotoxicity."( Discrepancy between the NCI-CTCAE and DEB-NTC scales in the evaluation of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Inoue, N; Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Kishino, T; Kumamoto, K; Okada, N; Sano, M, 2012
)
" Grades 3 and 4 adverse events included diarrhea (21% in the mIFL group and 26% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group) and neutropenia (19% in the mIFL group and 33% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group)."( Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial.
Ba, Y; Feng, FY; Guan, ZZ; He, J; Liang, J; Luo, RC; Qi, C; Qin, SK; Shen, L; Wang, D; Wang, JJ; Wang, LW; Xu, JM; Xu, RH; Yu, SY, 2011
)
" The literature review describes that the use of methotrexate for abortion purpose with therapeutic-dose presents a similar adverse effects to those found in our patient, however there are no case reports that describe the use of this drug in macrodosis for the same purpose, and their cytotoxic effects."( [Acute toxicity by methotrexate used for abortion purpose. Case report].
Belmont-Gómez, A; Carvajal-Valencia, JA; Chacón-Solís, RA; Estrada-Altamirano, A; Hernández-Pacheco, JA; Maya-Quiñones, JL; Valenzuela-Jirón, A, 2011
)
" Although skin toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with EGFR inhibitors, the differences in efficacy and safety between pre-emptive and reactive skin treatment according to KRAS tumor status has not been reported."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Iannotti, N; Lacouture, ME; Mitchell, EP; Pillai, MV; Piperdi, B; Shearer, H; Xu, F; Yassine, M, 2011
)
" The most commonly observed adverse events by KRAS tumor status included dermatitis acneiform and pruritus."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Iannotti, N; Lacouture, ME; Mitchell, EP; Pillai, MV; Piperdi, B; Shearer, H; Xu, F; Yassine, M, 2011
)
"FOLFIRI-B may be an efficient and safe choice in the 2nd line treatment of patients with MCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin."( Safety and efficacy of FOLFIRI-bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma as second line treatment.
Abali, H; Babacan, AN; Civelek, B; Dogan, U; Isik, M; Kos, T; Odabas, H; Oksuzoglu, B; Ozdemir, N; Zengin, N,
)
" Most frequently reported adverse events (AE) included hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurosensory adverse events (NSAE)."( Safety analysis of FOLFOX4 treatment in colorectal cancer patients: a comparison between two Asian studies and four Western studies.
André, T; Brienza, S; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Gomi, K; Lee, PH; Mizunuma, N; Ohtsu, A; Rothenberg, ML; Shimada, Y; Sugihara, K, 2012
)
" Adverse effects ≥ grade 2 were observed in 32% of the patients and adverse effects ≥ grade 3 in 15%."( Safety and outcome of chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer: results from two French tertiary centres.
Bensadoun, RJ; Hamidou, H; Michel, P; Paillot, B; Roullet, B; Silvain, C; Tougeron, D; Tourani, JM, 2012
)
"In selected elderly patients, chemoradiotherapy is well-tolerated, without any significant increase in adverse events, and the results are similar to those recorded in younger patients."( Safety and outcome of chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer: results from two French tertiary centres.
Bensadoun, RJ; Hamidou, H; Michel, P; Paillot, B; Roullet, B; Silvain, C; Tougeron, D; Tourani, JM, 2012
)
" The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and safety, including response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and grade ≥3 adverse events, between patients aged ≥65 years and patients aged <65 years."( Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin between elderly patients over 65 years and younger patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Bang, HY; Cho, YH; Hong Lee, M; Kim, SY; Lee, KY; Yoo, MW; Yoon, SY, 2012
)
"803E-03) with adverse drug reactions (ADRs)."( Pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer: a genome-wide association study to predict toxicity after 5-fluorouracil or FOLFOX administration.
Andreu, M; Baiget, M; Bessa, X; Brea-Fernández, A; Bujanda, L; Candamio, S; Carracedo, A; Castells, A; Castellví-Bel, S; Cazier, JB; Cortejoso, L; Crous-Bou, M; Durán, G; Fernandez-Rozadilla, C; Gallardo, E; García, MI; González, D; Gonzalo, V; Guinó, E; Jover, R; Lamas, MJ; Llor, X; López, R; López-Fernández, LA; Moreno, V; Páez, D; Palles, C; Paré, L; Reñé, JM; Rodrigo, L; Ruiz-Ponte, C; Tomlinson, I; Xicola, R, 2013
)
" The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) were 80% in S-1 and 74% in UFT/LV."( Safety of UFT/LV and S-1 as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in phase III trial: ACTS-CC trial.
Boku, N; Endo, T; Ikejiri, K; Kameoka, S; Kinugasa, Y; Kotake, K; Matsubara, Y; Mochizuki, H; Mochizuki, I; Nakamoto, Y; Shinozaki, H; Sugihara, K; Takagane, A; Takahashi, K; Takahashi, Y; Takii, Y; Takiuchi, H; Tomita, N; Watanabe, M; Watanabe, T, 2012
)
" The major dose-limiting toxic effect of oxaliplatin is neurotoxicity."( Preventive effect of traditional Japanese medicine on neurotoxicity of FOLFOX for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Ando, T; Fukuoka, J; Horikawa, N; Hosokawa, A; Kajiura, S; Kobayashi, Y; Ogawa, K; Sugiyama, T; Suzuki, N; Tsukioka, Y; Ueda, A; Yabushita, K, 2012
)
"Sequential IRIS + bevacizumab is a safe and effective method of systemic chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer and is compatible with mFOLFIRI + bevacizumab."( Safety verification trials of mFOLFIRI and sequential IRIS + bevacizumab as first- or second-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japanese patients.
Akiyama, S; Andoh, H; Gamoh, M; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Maeda, S; Mori, T; Murakawa, Y; Ohori, H; Sasaki, Y; Shimodaira, H; Suzuki, T; Takahashi, S; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2012
)
"Still there is no consensus on the choice of the most efficient and the least toxic chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( [Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of protocol cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin compared to protocol fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer].
Andrić, Z; Crevar, S; Gutović, J; Kostić, S; Kovčin, V; Murtezani, Z; Randjelović, T,
)
" This rare but potentially fatal side effect has neither identified risk factors nor established treatment guideline."( Oxaliplatin-induced lung toxicity. Case report and review of the literature.
Abeni, C; Bertocchi, P; Prochilo, T; Zaniboni, A, 2012
)
" Toxicity was mild; most adverse events were grade I or II and involved no severe infections or deaths."( Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOX7 regimen on the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Cai, J; Chen, RX; Meng, H; Wang, KL; Wang, Y; Wu, GC; Zhang, J; Zhang, ZT, 2012
)
"These results suggest that HR + RFA after effective chemotherapy is a safe procedure with low local recurrence at the RFA site and is a potentially effective treatment option for patients with initially unresectable CRLM."( Hepatic resection combined with radiofrequency ablation for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases after effective chemotherapy is a safe procedure with a low incidence of local recurrence.
Baba, H; Beppu, T; Chikamoto, A; Hayashi, H; Kikuchi, K; Kuroki, H; Mima, K; Miyamoto, Y; Nakagawa, S; Okabe, H; Sakamoto, Y; Watanabe, M, 2013
)
" FOLFIRI regimen is safe and effective in the second-line treatment of AGC patients pre-treated with cisplatin and taxanes."( The efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan with leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens.
Alkis, N; Arpacı, E; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Bilici, A; Budakoglu, B; Buyukberber, S; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Inal, A; Isıkdogan, A; Kaya, AO; Ozkan, M; Yumuk, F, 2012
)
" Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred during 5-FU/RT and during combined 5-FU/RT + mFOLFOX-6 were recorded."( Gene polymorphisms predict toxicity to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer.
Chen, Z; Duldulao, MP; Garcia-Aguilar, J; Ho, J; Kim, J; Le, M; Lee, W; Li, W; Nelson, RA, 2013
)
" An increase in adverse events associated with systemic chemotherapy is shown in elderly patients, but it remains controversial whether they should receive the same chemotherapy used for younger patients."( A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of a first-line treatment with modified FOLFOX-4 in unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients.
Hou, MF; Lu, CY; Ma, CJ; Tsai, HL; Wang, JY; Wu, DC; Wu, IC; Yeh, YS, 2012
)
" Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable adverse events occurred."( A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of a first-line treatment with modified FOLFOX-4 in unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients.
Hou, MF; Lu, CY; Ma, CJ; Tsai, HL; Wang, JY; Wu, DC; Wu, IC; Yeh, YS, 2012
)
"The mFOLFOX-4 therapy is an effective and safe first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients."( A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of a first-line treatment with modified FOLFOX-4 in unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients.
Hou, MF; Lu, CY; Ma, CJ; Tsai, HL; Wang, JY; Wu, DC; Wu, IC; Yeh, YS, 2012
)
"The grades of neurosensory adverse events (NSAEs) induced by FOLFOX4 treatment were compared between Asian and Western colorectal cancer patients and correlated with cumulative oxaliplatin doses."( Analysis of neurosensory adverse events induced by FOLFOX4 treatment in colorectal cancer patients: a comparison between two Asian studies and four Western studies.
André, T; Brienza, S; Goldberg, RM; Gomi, K; Gramont, A; Lee, PH; Mizunuma, N; Ohtsu, A; Rothenberg, ML; Shimada, Y; Sugihara, K, 2012
)
" The use of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe before hepatic resection."( Bevacizumab treatment before resection of colorectal liver metastases: safety, recovery of liver function, pathologic assessment.
Baranyai, ZS; Besznyák, I; Bursics, A; Dede, K; Jakab, F; Landherr, L; Mersich, T; Salamon, F; Zaránd, A, 2013
)
" Most treatment-related adverse events occurred at similar rates in both treatment arms."( Safety analysis of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 versus paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil/calcium folinate as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter open random phase II trial.
Ba, Y; Deng, T; Guo, ZQ; Hu, CH; Huang, DZ; Meng, JC; Wan, HP; Wang, ML; Xiong, JP; Xu, N; Yan, Z; Yao, Y; Yu, Z; Yu, ZH; Zhang, Y; Zheng, RS; Zhuang, ZX, 2013
)
"Balancing efficacy and safety of drugs is key for successful cancer therapy, as adverse reactions can prohibit the use of efficacious treatments."( Preemptive leucovorin administration minimizes pralatrexate toxicity without sacrificing efficacy.
Geskin, LJ; Koch, E; Story, SK, 2013
)
" The most commonly reported adverse events in the FOLFOX6 cohorts included decreased appetite, neutropenia, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, and vomiting."( An open-label study of the safety and tolerability of pazopanib in combination with FOLFOX6 or CapeOx in patients with colorectal cancer.
Adams, LM; Botbyl, J; Brady, J; Chau, I; Corrie, P; Digumarti, R; Laubscher, KH; Mallath, M; Midgley, RS, 2013
)
" The frequency of grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were comparatively assessed in each treatment arm."( Comparative assessment of skin and subcutaneous toxicity in patients of advanced colorectal carcinoma treated with different schedules of FOLFOX.
Bano, N; Mateen, A; Najam, R, 2013
)
" The most frequent adverse symptom of skin and subcutaneous toxicity reported in the patients treated with modified schedule of FOLFOX was pruritus (grade 1)."( Comparative assessment of skin and subcutaneous toxicity in patients of advanced colorectal carcinoma treated with different schedules of FOLFOX.
Bano, N; Mateen, A; Najam, R, 2013
)
" Simultaneous heterozygous UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms may produce higher exposure to SN-38 and a higher risk of adverse effects related to irinotecan."( Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity in a patient with UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms.
Ge, FJ; Lin, L; Liu, ZY; Sharma, MR; Wang, Y; Xu, JM, 2013
)
" Grade 3/4 adverse events were: neutropenia (54."( Safety and efficacy of modified FOLFOX6 plus high-dose bevacizumab in second-line or later treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Maruyama, S; Takii, Y, 2013
)
" The bimonthly regimen of high dose leucovorin is reported to be less toxic and more effective as compared to the monthly regimen of low dose leucovorin."( Comparative cardiac toxicity in two treatment schedules of 5-FU/LV for colorectal carcinoma.
Bano, N; Mateen, A; Najam, R, 2013
)
"Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based treatment is safe and efficient as preoperative treatment of mCRC with primarily unresectable liver metastases."( Safety and efficacy of addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis- a single institution experience.
Cvetanovic, A; Filipovic, S; Milenkovic, D; Milenkovic, N; Pejcic, I; Vrbic, S; Zivkovic, N,
)
" Recognizing this self-limiting toxic effect of oxaliplatin is important in order to avoid dose reductions that may affect clinical outcomes."( A curious case of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: recurrent, self-limiting dysarthria.
Dasanu, CA; Joseph, R, 2014
)
" The severity of OPN was assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events at baseline, every 2 weeks until the 8th cycle, and every 4 weeks thereafter until the 26th week."( Goshajinkigan oxaliplatin neurotoxicity evaluation (GONE): a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trial of goshajinkigan to prevent oxaliplatin‑induced neuropathy.
Fukunaga, M; Hata, T; Kojima, H; Kono, T; Matsui, T; Mishima, H; Morita, S; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Sakamoto, J; Shimada, M; Takemoto, H, 2013
)
"There were no statistically significant neuropathy differences among the study arms as measured by the primary end point or additional measures of neuropathy, including clinician-determined measurement of the time to grade 2 neuropathy by using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale or an oxaliplatin-specific neuropathy scale."( Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of intravenous calcium and magnesium to prevent oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity (N08CB/Alliance).
Atherton, P; Dakhil, SR; Fehrenbacher, L; Flynn, KA; Grothey, A; Lewis, GC; Loprinzi, CL; Qamar, R; Qin, R; Seisler, D, 2014
)
" The clinical efficacy and bevacizumab-related adverse reactions were observed."( [Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, mCRC].
Chen, Y; Cui, YH; Guo, X; Liu, TS; Yu, YY; Zhou, YH; Zhuang, RY, 2013
)
" Severe toxic reactions to 5-FU have been associated with decreased levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity."( A DPYD variant (Y186C) specific to individuals of African descent in a patient with life-threatening 5-FU toxic effects: potential for an individualized medicine approach.
Diasio, RB; Lee, AM; McConnell, K; Offer, SM; Relias, V; Saif, MW, 2014
)
"0144) adverse effects in stage II/III patients."( Personalized dosing via pharmacokinetic monitoring of 5-fluorouracil might reduce toxicity in early- or late-stage colorectal cancer patients treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens.
Beachler, C; El-Deiry, WS; Harvey, HA; Kline, CL; Mackley, HB; McKenna, K; Messaris, E; Poritz, L; Schiccitano, A; Sheikh, H; Sivik, J; Staveley-O'Carroll, K; Stewart, D; Zhu, J, 2014
)
"We have planned a multicentre prospective study to examine the relative impact of the efficacy and adverse events of cetuximab plus first-line chemotherapy on the quality of life in Japanese patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer."( A prospective observational study to examine the relationship between quality of life and adverse events of first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: QUACK Trial.
Ando, M; Fujii, H; Ooki, A; Sakamoto, J; Sato, A; Yamaguchi, K, 2014
)
" This treatment should be considered regardless of patients' age alone, but consideration should be given to the capacity of patients to tolerate adverse events."( Toxicity of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer: a population-based study.
Bedenne, L; Bouvier, AM; Faivre, J; Hamza, S; Lepage, C; Rollot, F, 2014
)
"8% and grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 12."( A combination of oral uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT + LV) is a safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal cancer: safety report of the UFT/LV study.
Hasegawa, K; Ijichi, M; Kawasaki, S; Kokudo, N; Koyama, H; Makuuchi, M; Miyagawa, S; Oba, M; Saiura, A; Takayama, T; Teruya, M; Yamamoto, J; Yoshimi, F, 2014
)
" The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (grade 3: 33."( An open-label phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab combined with mFOLFOX-6 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Asmis, TR; Ayoub, JP; Ballal, S; Cervantes, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Maurel, J; Moore, MJ; Nasroulah, F; Rivera, F; Schwartz, JD; Tabernero, J, 2014
)
" The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 75."( Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial.
Baba, H; Hamada, C; Kakeji, Y; Katsumata, K; Koda, K; Kodaira, S; Kondo, K; Matsuoka, J; Morita, T; Nishimura, G; Sadahiro, S; Saji, S; Sasaki, K; Sato, S; Tsuchiya, T; Usuki, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 2014
)
"Oral UFT plus leucovorin given by either dosage schedule is a very safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy."( Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial.
Baba, H; Hamada, C; Kakeji, Y; Katsumata, K; Koda, K; Kodaira, S; Kondo, K; Matsuoka, J; Morita, T; Nishimura, G; Sadahiro, S; Saji, S; Sasaki, K; Sato, S; Tsuchiya, T; Usuki, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 2014
)
" A series of adverse events were comparable between two arms, whereas some of the antibody therapy-associated toxicities were observed in FOLFIRI+PB arm."( Safety and efficacy of second-line treatment with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in combination of panitumumab and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Fan, Z; Han, G; He, L; Qin, Z; Xie, S; Xu, W, 2014
)
" As psoriasis is an incurable disease, the goal of the MTX treatment is to suppress psoriasis, achieving long-term remissions with minimal treatment-related adverse events (AEs)."( Folate supplementation reduces the side effects of methotrexate therapy for psoriasis.
Baran, W; Batycka-Baran, A; Bieniek, A; Szepietowski, JC; Zychowska, M, 2014
)
" The comparison revealed no significant differences in response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the frequency of overall adverse events after the start of second-line chemotherapy, although the frequency of anemia(Bgrade 3, p=0."( [The efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI or combined FOLFIRI and bevacizumab treatment as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients aged 75 years and older].
Baba, H; Chika, N; Haga, N; Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Kumagai, Y; Kumamoto, K; Okada, N; Sano, M; Tajima, Y, 2014
)
" R0 resection, survival, and adverse events were compared."( Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 regimen to treat advanced gastric cancer improves survival without increasing adverse events: a retrospective cohort study from a Chinese center.
Li, Y; Sun, Z; Yang, GF; Zhu, RJ, 2014
)
"The FOLFOX4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy could improve survival without increasing adverse events in patients with AGC."( Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 regimen to treat advanced gastric cancer improves survival without increasing adverse events: a retrospective cohort study from a Chinese center.
Li, Y; Sun, Z; Yang, GF; Zhu, RJ, 2014
)
" OBJECTIVE response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were recorded, and the relationships between various clinical factors and PFS or OS were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards models."( Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chen, L; Ju, HX; Liu, BX; Liu, LY; Luo, C; Xu, Q; Yang, YS; Ying, JE; Zhao, YZ; Zhong, HJ; Zhu, LM, 2014
)
" We studied whether haematological (leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) or non-haematological (mucositis, diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, hand-foot syndrome or other toxicity) adverse events were associated with disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in a large patient material treated with 5-fluorouracil based adjuvant chemotherapy."( Association of adverse events and survival in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: Is efficacy an impact of toxicity?
André, T; Bono, P; de Gramont, A; Hermunen, K; Österlund, P; Poussa, T; Quinaux, E; Soveri, LM, 2014
)
"Specific adverse events related to adjuvant fluorouracil chemotherapy are associated with improved DFS and OS in early stage CRC patients."( Association of adverse events and survival in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: Is efficacy an impact of toxicity?
André, T; Bono, P; de Gramont, A; Hermunen, K; Österlund, P; Poussa, T; Quinaux, E; Soveri, LM, 2014
)
"To assess the frequency and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients treated with four different schedules of FOLFOX."( Gastrointestinal adverse effects in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients treated with different schedules of FOLFOX.
Bano, N; Mateen, A; Najam, R; Qazi, F, 2014
)
" The severity of adverse effects (Grade 3 and 4) assessed in each treatment arm was compared."( Gastrointestinal adverse effects in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients treated with different schedules of FOLFOX.
Bano, N; Mateen, A; Najam, R; Qazi, F, 2014
)
" Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective technique for treatment of isolated liver metastasis."( Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation with aflibercept and FOLFIRI in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Agarwal, A; Butler-Bowen, H; Daly, KP; Saif, MW, 2014
)
"In 2594 patients with complete adverse event (AE) data, the incidence of grade 3 or greater 5FU-AEs in DPYD*2A, I560S, and D949V carriers were 22/25 (88."( DPYD variants as predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity in adjuvant colon cancer treatment (NCCTG N0147).
Alberts, SR; Berenberg, JL; Diasio, RB; Goldberg, RM; Lee, AM; Pavey, E; Sargent, DJ; Shi, Q; Sinicrope, FA, 2014
)
" By exclusion the pseudo-obstruction was attributed to a toxic oxaliplatin-induced autonomic neuropathy which slowly improved during months of follow-up."( A case of delayed oxaliplatin-induced pseudo-obstruction: an atypical presentation of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity.
Bleecker, JD; Pauwels, W; Vandamme, M, 2015
)
"Peripheral sensory neurotoxicity is a frequent adverse effect of oxaliplatin therapy."( Preventive effect of Goshajinkigan on peripheral neurotoxicity of FOLFOX therapy (GENIUS trial): a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase III study.
Baba, H; Emi, Y; Higashijima, J; Ishida, H; Kakeji, Y; Kato, T; Kojima, H; Kon, M; Kono, T; Maehara, Y; Miyake, Y; Ogata, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sakaguchi, Y; Shirabe, K; Takahashi, K; Tomita, N; Yamanaka, T, 2015
)
" The primary endpoint was the time to grade 2 or greater neuropathy, which was determined at any point during or after oxaliplatin-based therapy using version 3 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE)."( Preventive effect of Goshajinkigan on peripheral neurotoxicity of FOLFOX therapy (GENIUS trial): a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase III study.
Baba, H; Emi, Y; Higashijima, J; Ishida, H; Kakeji, Y; Kato, T; Kojima, H; Kon, M; Kono, T; Maehara, Y; Miyake, Y; Ogata, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sakaguchi, Y; Shirabe, K; Takahashi, K; Tomita, N; Yamanaka, T, 2015
)
" The main side effect of pemetrexed is myelosuppression, which may be prevented by folinic acid supplementation."( [Pemetrexed nephrotoxicity].
Izzedine, H, 2015
)
"Modern anticancer chemotherapy can cause numerous adverse effects in the organism, whose functioning has already been disrupted by the neoplastic process itself."( Evaluation of the toxicity of anticancer chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer.
Filipczyk-Cisarż, E; Kowalska, T; Nartowski, K; Wiela-Hojeńska, A; Łapiński, Ł,
)
"Docetaxel-cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (days 1-21) represents a standard but toxic regimen for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC)."( Feasibility and safety of dose-dense modified docetaxel-cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen (mTPF) in locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancers: a retrospective monocentric study.
Breheret, R; Capitain, O; Laccourreye, L; Linot, B; Peyraga, G; Yossi, S, 2015
)
"Dose-dense mTPF (days 1-14) is safe and seems to be as effective as TPF (days 1-21)."( Feasibility and safety of dose-dense modified docetaxel-cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen (mTPF) in locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancers: a retrospective monocentric study.
Breheret, R; Capitain, O; Laccourreye, L; Linot, B; Peyraga, G; Yossi, S, 2015
)
" The phase I dose escalation study revealed curcumin to be a safe and tolerable adjunct to FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with CRLM (n = 12) at doses up to 2 grams daily."( Curcumin inhibits cancer stem cell phenotypes in ex vivo models of colorectal liver metastases, and is clinically safe and tolerable in combination with FOLFOX chemotherapy.
Berry, DP; Brown, K; Cai, H; Dennison, A; Garcea, G; Greaves, P; Griffin-Teal, N; Higgins, JA; Howells, LM; Irving, G; Iwuji, C; James, MI; Karmokar, A; Lloyd, DM; Metcalfe, M; Morgan, B; Patel, SR; Steward, WP; Thomas, A, 2015
)
" Most grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported during the initial cycles of treatment."( Aflibercept for metastatic colorectal cancer: safety data from the Spanish named patient program.
Díaz de Corcuera, I; García de la Torre, M; Pérez Hoyos, MT; Salgado Fernández, M; Vidal Arbués, A, 2015
)
"Chemotherapy-induced toxic liver injury is a relevant issue in the clinical management of patients affected with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Liver toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI-containing regimen: a single institution experience.
Fausti, V; Gallo, P; Imperatori, M; Picardi, A; Santini, D; Spalato Ceruso, M; Tonini, G; Vespasiani Gentilucci, U; Vincenzi, B, 2015
)
" All patients experienced at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event: neutropenia (five patients, 83%), proteinuria (two patients; 33%) and anemia, thrombocytopenia and hypertension (one patient each, 17%)."( Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Second-line Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.
Gao, L; Gotoh, M; Nasroulah, F; Ohtsu, A; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Yoshizuka, N, 2015
)
" There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of grade 3-4 adverse events (EOX 79."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial.
Budzynski, A; Fijorek, K; Konopka, K; Krzemieniecki, K; Lazar, A; Matlok, M; Ochenduszko, S; Pedziwiatr, M; Puskulluoglu, M; Sinczak-Kuta, A; Urbanczyk, K, 2015
)
" Despite heterogeneity in response to aflibercept, no biomarkers for efficacy or adverse effects have been identified."( Evaluation of efficacy and safety markers in a phase II study of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with aflibercept in the first-line setting.
Chiron, M; Folprecht, G; Lambrechts, D; Margherini, E; Moisse, M; Pericay, C; Peuteman, G; Sagaert, X; Thienpont, B; Thuillier, V; Van Cutsem, E; Zalcberg, J; Zilocchi, C, 2015
)
" We assessed correlations of these three classes of biomarkers with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs)."( Evaluation of efficacy and safety markers in a phase II study of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with aflibercept in the first-line setting.
Chiron, M; Folprecht, G; Lambrechts, D; Margherini, E; Moisse, M; Pericay, C; Peuteman, G; Sagaert, X; Thienpont, B; Thuillier, V; Van Cutsem, E; Zalcberg, J; Zilocchi, C, 2015
)
"The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is considered the first-line chemotherapy for fit patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but carries an unfavourable adverse event (AE) profile."( Safety and Efficacy of Modified FOLFIRINOX for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A UK Single-Centre Experience.
Basu, B; Calder, J; Corrie, P; Ghorani, E; Hewitt, C; Wong, HH, 2015
)
" Then the recovery time of bowel function, the incidence of adverse reactions and complications, and the pre- and post-chemotherapy routine blood tests and hepatorenal functions were compared."( [Safety evaluation of intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy with Lobaplatin for advanced colorectal cancers].
Feng, L; Liu, Q; Liu, Y; Wu, X; Xia, D; Xu, L, 2015
)
"Peritoneal implantation of Lobaplatin as intraoperative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer is safe and tolerable."( [Safety evaluation of intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy with Lobaplatin for advanced colorectal cancers].
Feng, L; Liu, Q; Liu, Y; Wu, X; Xia, D; Xu, L, 2015
)
" The primary objective was to investigate the incidence of adverse drug reactions, particularly those of interest for bevacizumab."( Bevacizumab safety in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer.
Doi, T; Hatake, K; Ishihara, Y; Shirao, K; Takahashi, Y; Uetake, H, 2016
)
"5%) were the most common adverse drug reaction."( Bevacizumab safety in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer.
Doi, T; Hatake, K; Ishihara, Y; Shirao, K; Takahashi, Y; Uetake, H, 2016
)
" Toxicity over four cycles was graded according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria V2 or V3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD)."( Lean body mass as an independent determinant of dose-limiting toxicity and neuropathy in patients with colon cancer treated with FOLFOX regimens.
Ali, R; Assenat, E; Baracos, VE; Bianchi, L; Mollevi, C; Roberts, S; Sawyer, MB; Senesse, P, 2016
)
" We evaluated the safety and tolerability of ATII-cell transplantation by assessing the emergent adverse side effects that appeared within 12 months."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
"No significant adverse events were associated with the ATII-cell intratracheal transplantation."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
"Our results support the hypothesis that ATII-cell intratracheal transplantation is safe and well tolerated in patients with IPF."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
" We evaluated treatment-related adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)."( Safety and Management of Toxicity Related to Aflibercept in Combination with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Malaysian Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Abdullah, NM; Sharial, MM; Yusof, MM; Zaatar, A, 2016
)
" This infusion rate is safe for use in routine practice."( Faster FOLFOX: Oxaliplatin Can Be Safely Infused at a Rate of 1 mg/m2/min.
Cercek, A; Kemeny, NE; Park, V; Reidy-Lagunes, D; Saltz, LB; Segal, NH; Stadler, ZK; Varghese, A; Yaeger, R, 2016
)
" All adverse events resolved with supportive management."( Safety and efficacy of aflibercept in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of Asian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chong, DQ; Choo, SP; Chua, C; Imperial, M; Manalo, M; Ng, M; Tan, IB; Teo, P; Yong, G, 2016
)
"Traditional methods of reporting adverse events in clinical trials are inadequate for modern cancer treatments with chronic administration."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
"We developed an analytic approach and standardised, comprehensive format, the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) approach, which combines graphs and adverse event tabular displays with multiple longitudinal statistical techniques into a readily applicable method to study toxic effects."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
"The ToxT analytical approach incorporates the dimension of time into adverse event assessment and offers a more comprehensive depiction of toxic effects than present methods."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
"4% experienced grade 3/4 adverse events."( Effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of the ETNA observational cohort.
Becouarn, Y; Fourrier-Réglat, A; Grelaud, A; Guimbaud, R; Jové, J; Moore, N; Noize, P; Ravaud, A; Robinson, P; Rouyer, M; Smith, D; Tubiana-Mathieu, N, 2016
)
"The present study adds to the literature on the safe and beneficial effect of bevacizumab in the elderly receiving FOLFIRI regimen."( Effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of the ETNA observational cohort.
Becouarn, Y; Fourrier-Réglat, A; Grelaud, A; Guimbaud, R; Jové, J; Moore, N; Noize, P; Ravaud, A; Robinson, P; Rouyer, M; Smith, D; Tubiana-Mathieu, N, 2016
)
" The risk of mortality, therapeutic efficacy, and adverse effect were meta-analyzed."( Efficacy and safety of addition of bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV (IFL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Chen, K; Gong, Y; Shen, Y; Zhang, Q; Zhou, T, 2016
)
" The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were nausea (18."( Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. A Single Center Experience.
Bodoky, G; Harsanyi, L; Hegyi, P; Lakatos, G; Nehéz, L; Petranyi, A; Szűcs, A, 2017
)
" Previous studies have suggested that apatinib is safe and effective in some solid tumors."( Significant efficacy and well safety of apatinib in an advanced liver cancer patient: a case report and literature review.
Kong, L; Kou, P; Shao, W; Wang, H; Yu, J; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhu, H, 2017
)
" The frequency and severity of these adverse events vary from patient to patient and are partially explained by genetic polymorphism into the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene."( Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Toxicity in Two Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: Potential Role of Common DPYD Polymorphisms.
Cergnul, M; Cheli, S; Falvella, FS; Fava, S; Luoni, M, 2017
)
"There is little data on the frequency of adverse events following acute methotrexate ingestions in pediatric patients."( Evaluation of toxicity after acute accidental methotrexate ingestions in children under 6 years old: a 16-year multi-center review.
Beuhler, MC; Hays, H; Mowry, JB; Ryan, ML; Spiller, HA; Spiller, NE; Webb, A; Weber, J, 2018
)
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were comparable for patients <65years and ≥65years old."( Observed benefit and safety of aflibercept in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An age-based analysis from the randomized placebo-controlled phase III VELOUR trial.
Dochy, E; Lakomy, R; Macarulla, T; Magherini, E; Moiseyenko, VM; Papamichael, D; Prausova, J; Ruff, P; Soussan-Lazard, K; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, GA, 2018
)
" Demographics, disease presentation, initial treatment plan, treatment outcome, and treatment-related adverse events were assessed."( Effectiveness and toxicity of first-line methotrexate chemotherapy in low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience.
Berkowitz, RS; de Freitas Segalla Moreira, M; Elias, KM; Goldstein, DP; Horowitz, NS; Maestá, I; Nitecki, R, 2018
)
"001) and need to switch to second-line therapy due to treatment-related adverse events (5."( Effectiveness and toxicity of first-line methotrexate chemotherapy in low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience.
Berkowitz, RS; de Freitas Segalla Moreira, M; Elias, KM; Goldstein, DP; Horowitz, NS; Maestá, I; Nitecki, R, 2018
)
" Although treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with 8-day MTX/FA, these were all self-limited and resolved with no long-term sequelae."( Effectiveness and toxicity of first-line methotrexate chemotherapy in low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience.
Berkowitz, RS; de Freitas Segalla Moreira, M; Elias, KM; Goldstein, DP; Horowitz, NS; Maestá, I; Nitecki, R, 2018
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events with cetuximab plus FOLFOX administered as second- and third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients."( Efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOX in second-line and third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Arpaci, E; Demir, H; Eker, B; Gokmen Erdem, U; Inanc, M; Karaagac, M; Kiziltepe, M; Metin Seker, M; Ozaslan, E; Ozkan, M; Topaloglu, US,
)
" The overall incidence of any Grade adverse events (AEs) were 91."( Planned Safety Analysis of the ACTS-CC 02 Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 With Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur and Uracil With Leucovorin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer.
Aiba, K; Baba, H; Boku, N; Ishiguro, M; Itabashi, M; Kotake, K; Kunieda, K; Kusumoto, T; Maeda, A; Mochizuki, I; Morita, S; Okabe, M; Ota, M; Sakamoto, Y; Sugihara, K; Sunami, E; Takahashi, K; Tomita, N; Yamauchi, J; Yoshida, K, 2018
)
"Acne-like skin rash is a frequently occurring adverse event associated with drugs against the epidermal growth factor receptor."( EVITA-a double-blind, vehicle-controlled, randomized phase II trial of vitamin K1 cream as prophylaxis for cetuximab-induced skin toxicity.
Al-Batran, SE; Ettrich, TJ; Feustel, HP; Heeger, S; Hofheinz, RD; Homann, N; Kripp, M; Lorenzen, S; Merx, K; Ocvirk, J; Schatz, M; Schulte, N; Schulz, H; Tetyusheva, M; Trojan, J; Vlassak, S, 2018
)
"The primary end point was the 10-month progression-free rate (PFR); secondary end points included progression-free and overall survival, response rate, rate of metastases resection, and adverse events."( Activity and Safety of Cetuximab Plus Modified FOLFOXIRI Followed by Maintenance With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Antoniotti, C; Aprile, G; Bergamo, F; Boni, L; Cardellino, GG; Coltelli, L; Corsi, DC; Cremolini, C; Dell'Aquila, E; Di Fabio, F; Falcone, A; Fontanini, G; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Lonardi, S; Lupi, C; Mancini, ML; Marcucci, L; Marmorino, F; Masi, G; Mescoli, C; Ronzoni, M; Salvatore, L; Tonini, G; Zagonel, V, 2018
)
" Main grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 36 patients [31%]), diarrhea (in 21 patients [18%]), skin toxic effects (in 18 patients [16%]), asthenia (in 11 patients [9%]), stomatitis (in 7 patients [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (in 3 patients [3%])."( Activity and Safety of Cetuximab Plus Modified FOLFOXIRI Followed by Maintenance With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Antoniotti, C; Aprile, G; Bergamo, F; Boni, L; Cardellino, GG; Coltelli, L; Corsi, DC; Cremolini, C; Dell'Aquila, E; Di Fabio, F; Falcone, A; Fontanini, G; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Lonardi, S; Lupi, C; Mancini, ML; Marcucci, L; Marmorino, F; Masi, G; Mescoli, C; Ronzoni, M; Salvatore, L; Tonini, G; Zagonel, V, 2018
)
" We calculated the incidence of "any-grade" and "severe" toxicity for haematological and non-haematological adverse events of each group."( A systematic review of the safety profile of the different combinations of fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients.
Baratelli, C; Brizzi, MP; Di Maio, M; Scagliotti, GV; Sonetto, C; Tampellini, M; Zichi, C, 2018
)
" Secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and the completion rate of study therapy."( Safety of mFOLFOX6/XELOX as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of stage III colon cancer: phase II clinical study (The FACOS study).
Ishibashi, K; Ishida, H; Kato, H; Kato, R; Koda, K; Kosugi, C; Mori, M; Narushima, K; Oya, M; Shuto, K; Tanaka, S; Yoshimatsu, K, 2018
)
" Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 97."( Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI in the Real-life Setting: Safety and Quality of Life Data From the Italian Patient Cohort of the Aflibercept Safety and Quality-of-Life Program Study.
Antoniotti, C; Aprile, G; Bordonaro, R; Ciuffreda, L; Di Bartolomeo, M; Di Costanzo, F; Fasola, G; Frassineti, GL; Iaffaioli, V; Leone, F; Maiello, E; Marchetti, P; Pastorino, A; Sobrero, A; Zaniboni, A; Zilocchi, C, 2018
)
" It did not affect HRQL and showed similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events as those observed in the VELOUR trial."( Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI in the Real-life Setting: Safety and Quality of Life Data From the Italian Patient Cohort of the Aflibercept Safety and Quality-of-Life Program Study.
Antoniotti, C; Aprile, G; Bordonaro, R; Ciuffreda, L; Di Bartolomeo, M; Di Costanzo, F; Fasola, G; Frassineti, GL; Iaffaioli, V; Leone, F; Maiello, E; Marchetti, P; Pastorino, A; Sobrero, A; Zaniboni, A; Zilocchi, C, 2018
)
" The objective of this study was to compare outcome measures, adverse effects, and cost of FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRINOX treatments in rectal cancer patients."( Comparisons of Efficacy, Safety, and Cost of Chemotherapy Regimens FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRINOX in Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Study.
Chen, Y; Liu, J; Qi, F; Yan, Q; Zhang, G; Zheng, Z, 2018
)
"FOLFIRINOX has been one of the first-line options for advanced pancreatic cancer, even though it induces significant adverse effects."( The benefits of modified FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer and its induced adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fan, Z; Liu, B; Lu, T; Tong, H, 2018
)
" The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (13 patients, 18%), febrile neutropenia (3 patients, 4%), diarrhea (11 patients, 15%), hypertension (19 patients, 26%), proteinuria (8 patients, 11%), infections (8 patients, 11%), and mucositis (6 patients, 8%), with no toxic deaths."( AMALTHEA: Prospective, Single-Arm Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of First-Line FOLFIRI + Aflibercept for 6 Months Followed by Aflibercept Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Efstratiou, I; Fountzilas, G; Goudopoulou, A; Kalogera-Fountzila, A; Kalogeropoulou, L; Karavasilis, V; Kentepozidis, N; Koliou, GA; Kotoula, V; Koumakis, G; Laschos, K; Pectasides, D; Pentheroudakis, G; Petraki, C; Poulios, C; Samantas, E; Sgouros, J; Souglakos, I; Tikas, I; Voutsina, A; Vrettou, E; Zarkavelis, G, 2018
)
" Preliminary data hint that this regimen has cytoreductive activity in disease with adverse biology."( AMALTHEA: Prospective, Single-Arm Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of First-Line FOLFIRI + Aflibercept for 6 Months Followed by Aflibercept Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Efstratiou, I; Fountzilas, G; Goudopoulou, A; Kalogera-Fountzila, A; Kalogeropoulou, L; Karavasilis, V; Kentepozidis, N; Koliou, GA; Kotoula, V; Koumakis, G; Laschos, K; Pectasides, D; Pentheroudakis, G; Petraki, C; Poulios, C; Samantas, E; Sgouros, J; Souglakos, I; Tikas, I; Voutsina, A; Vrettou, E; Zarkavelis, G, 2018
)
" Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events in patients were neutropenia in 69 cases (22."( [Analysis on safety and preliminary efficacy of dose-modified regimen of 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in advanced colorectal cancer].
Cai, Y; Deng, R; Deng, Y; Hu, H; Li, J; Ling, J; Wu, Z; Yang, L; Zhang, J, 2018
)
" Overall, grade 3 adverse events, such as leukopenia and neutropenia, were observed in two of three patients (66."( Safety of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase I trial.
Emoto, S; Hata, K; Hiyoshi, M; Ishihara, S; Ishimaru, K; Kaneko, M; Kawai, K; Muro, K; Murono, K; Nagata, H; Nishikawa, T; Nozawa, H; Otani, K; Sasaki, K; Shuno, Y; Tanaka, T, 2019
)
"The adverse events of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab or CapeOX-bevacizumab in combination with ip PTX were considered similar to those described in previous studies of oxaliplatin-based treatment alone."( Safety of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase I trial.
Emoto, S; Hata, K; Hiyoshi, M; Ishihara, S; Ishimaru, K; Kaneko, M; Kawai, K; Muro, K; Murono, K; Nagata, H; Nishikawa, T; Nozawa, H; Otani, K; Sasaki, K; Shuno, Y; Tanaka, T, 2019
)
" The current study aims at evaluating the patterns and predictors of cardiac adverse events associated with various 5-FU-based systemic therapy regimens among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( 5-Fluorouracil-related Cardiotoxicity; Findings From Five Randomized Studies of 5-Fluorouracil-based Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Abdel-Rahman, O, 2019
)
"Dose modification of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) is often needed, especially in second-line and later-line treatments due to adverse events of previous treatment and poor patient condition."( Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus modified FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aikawa, T; Akashi, K; Ariyama, H; Baba, E; Doi, Y; Esaki, T; Ito, M; Kobayashi, K; Kusaba, H; Makiyama, A; Mitsugi, K; Shimokawa, H; Takayoshi, K; Tsuchihashi, K; Uenomachi, M; Yoshihiro, T, 2019
)
" Neurological adverse effects were assessed by CTC v2."( Effect of diabetes on neurological adverse effects and chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with different FOLFOX regimens.
Bano, N; Ikram, R, 2019
)
" We included patients with rectal cancer who received 4 courses of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) before rectal surgery and examined the postoperative complication rate, the clinicopathological response, and the rate of chemotherapy-related adverse events (UMIN 000012559)."( Preoperative FOLFOX in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer can be a safe and promising strategy: the R-NAC-01 study.
Funakoshi, T; Hattori, M; Hirose, K; Homma, S; Ichikawa, N; Iijima, H; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, H; Kamiizumi, Y; Kawamata, F; Koike, M; Kon, H; Kuraya, D; Minagawa, N; Murata, R; Nomura, M; Ohno, Y; Omori, K; Sato, M; Takahashi, N; Takeda, K; Taketomi, A; Yokota, R; Yoshida, T, 2019
)
"Surgery after four courses of mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy can be a safe and promising strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer."( Preoperative FOLFOX in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer can be a safe and promising strategy: the R-NAC-01 study.
Funakoshi, T; Hattori, M; Hirose, K; Homma, S; Ichikawa, N; Iijima, H; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, H; Kamiizumi, Y; Kawamata, F; Koike, M; Kon, H; Kuraya, D; Minagawa, N; Murata, R; Nomura, M; Ohno, Y; Omori, K; Sato, M; Takahashi, N; Takeda, K; Taketomi, A; Yokota, R; Yoshida, T, 2019
)
"Addition of daily oral curcumin to FOLFOX chemotherapy was safe and tolerable (primary outcome)."( Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial.
Barber, S; Brown, K; Foreman, N; Gescher, A; Griffin-Teall, N; Howells, LM; Irving, GRB; Iwuji, COO; Morgan, B; Patel, SR; Sidat, Z; Singh, R; Steward, WP; Thomas, AL; Walter, H, 2019
)
"Curcumin is a safe and tolerable adjunct to FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial.
Barber, S; Brown, K; Foreman, N; Gescher, A; Griffin-Teall, N; Howells, LM; Irving, GRB; Iwuji, COO; Morgan, B; Patel, SR; Sidat, Z; Singh, R; Steward, WP; Thomas, AL; Walter, H, 2019
)
"Methotrexate (MTX) increases the risk of alopecia and stomatitis, but the prevalence of these adverse events among rheumatic patients taking MTX is poorly defined."( Low-Dose Methotrexate and Mucocutaneous Adverse Events: Results of a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Lalani, R; Lyu, H; Solomon, DH; Vanni, K, 2020
)
"This meta-analysis gives more precise estimates of mucocutaneous adverse events that occur in rheumatic disease patients taking MTX."( Low-Dose Methotrexate and Mucocutaneous Adverse Events: Results of a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Lalani, R; Lyu, H; Solomon, DH; Vanni, K, 2020
)
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated, and HRQL was assessed at baseline, cycle 3, and every other cycle using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CR29, and EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels questionnaires (NCT01571284)."( Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI for Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Observations from the Global Aflibercept Safety and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Program (ASQoP).
Aparicio, J; Bordonaro, R; Bury, D; Chau, I; Cicin, I; Di Bartolomeo, M; Drea, E; Fedyanin, MY; García-Alfonso, P; Heinemann, V; Karthaus, M; Kavan, P; Ko, YJ; Maiello, E; Martos, CF; Peeters, M; Picard, P; Riechelmann, RP; Sobrero, A; Srimuninnimit, V; Ter-Ovanesov, M; Yalcin, S, 2019
)
"9%) in arm B experienced grade 3/4 adverse events related to bevacizumab; the most frequent were 2 anastomotic fistulas (both in arm A) and abscesses (1 in arm A and 2 in arm B)."( Efficacy and Safety of Two Neoadjuvant Strategies With Bevacizumab in MRI-Defined Locally Advanced T3 Resectable Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized, Noncomparative Phase 2 INOVA Study.
Adenis, A; André, T; Azria, D; Bachet, JB; Balosso, J; Ben Abdelghani, M; Borg, C; Boudghène, F; Conroy, T; Coudert, M; François, Y; Ghiringhelli, F; Ionescu-Goga, M; Lakkis, Z; Mantion, G; Mornex, F; Quero, L; Rio, E; Roullet, B; Spaëth, D; Tanang, A; Vendrely, V, 2019
)
" Until now, only a few mild adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been published after short-term use of LDMTX, and no severe cases have been reported."( Severe toxic effects of low-dose methotrexate treatment for placenta accreta in a patient with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations.
Guo, H; Hu, K; Liu, W; Tan, Z; Zhao, R, 2020
)
" The studies demonstrated a significant benefit from the triplet at the price of an increased incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs)."( Impact of age and gender on the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies.
Allegrini, G; Aprile, G; Bergamo, F; Boccaccino, A; Boni, L; Borelli, B; Buonadonna, A; Cordio, S; Cremolini, C; Dell'Aquila, E; Falcone, A; Latiano, TP; Libertini, M; Lonardi, S; Marmorino, F; Masi, G; Moretto, R; Passardi, A; Pella, N; Randon, G; Ratti, M; Ricci, V; Ronzoni, M; Rossini, D; Tamburini, E; Urbano, F; Zucchelli, G, 2019
)
"Studies of patients treated with bevacizumab and other vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have reported that hypertension adverse events (AEs) are associated with improved overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS)."( Effect of Early Adverse Events on Survival Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Ramucirumab.
Hopkins, AM; Karapetis, CS; Lim, HH; Rowland, A; Sorich, MJ; Yuen, HY, 2019
)
" The secondary endpoints were chronic cumulative neurotoxicity (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), time to grade 2 neurotoxicity (NCI-CTCAE or the oxaliplatin-specific neuropathy scale), acute neurotoxicity (analog scale), rates of dose reduction or withdrawal due to OIPN, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and adverse events."( Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of monosialotetrahexosylganglioside for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in stage II/III colorectal cancer.
Chen, G; Deng, YH; Ding, PR; Fan, WH; Feng, F; Jin, Y; Li, YH; Liang, HL; Lu, ZH; Peng, JW; Ren, C; Shi, SM; Wang, DS; Wang, F; Wang, FH; Wang, W; Wang, ZQ; Xie, CB; Xu, RH; Zhang, JW, 2020
)
" However, their use in the elderly is discouraged because of adverse events."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
" The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were compared between the groups."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
" However, the elderly patients suffered a higher incidence of severe adverse events (50% vs."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
" In stage two, an additional 20 patients were enrolled at a starting dose as defined in stage one, provided that in stage ≥1 objective response or ≥2 stable diseases were observed and ≤3 patients had serious adverse events (SAEs) within the first 6 weeks of treatment."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial.
Belkouz, A; de Vos-Geelen, J; Eskens, FALM; Klümpen, HJ; Mathôt, RAA; Punt, CJA; van Gulik, TM; van Oijen, MGH; Wilmink, JW, 2020
)
" One patient had a SAE during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and five patients required a dose reduction due to adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial.
Belkouz, A; de Vos-Geelen, J; Eskens, FALM; Klümpen, HJ; Mathôt, RAA; Punt, CJA; van Gulik, TM; van Oijen, MGH; Wilmink, JW, 2020
)
" However, intestinal mucositis is a common adverse effect for which no effective preventive strategies exist."( Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Prevents Intestinal Injury, Upregulation of Toll-Like Receptors, and 5-Fluorouracil/Oxaliplatin-Induced Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer.
Chang, CW; Chen, MJ; Chen, YJ; Chiang Chiau, JS; Chuang, WH; Lee, HC; Li, LH; Liu, CY; Shih, SC; Tsai, TH; Wang, HY; Wang, TE, 2020
)
"SEMS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to elective surgery appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with obstructing left-sided colon cancer."( Efficacy and safety of self-expanding metallic stent placement followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and scheduled surgery for treatment of obstructing left-sided colonic cancer.
Han, JG; Wang, YB; Wang, ZJ; Wei, GH; Yi, BQ; Zeng, WG; Zhai, ZW; Zhao, BC, 2020
)
" However, its efficacy is often limited by adverse effects, such as intestinal toxicity."( Leucovorin ameliorated methotrexate induced intestinal toxicity via modulation of the gut microbiota.
Chen, L; Fang, Q; Huang, X; Ouyang, D; Rao, T; Tan, Z; Zeng, X; Zhou, L, 2020
)
" A modified FOLFOXIRI regimen is also widely used to reduce adverse events."( Efficacy and Safety of Modified FOLFOXIRI+α in the Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Single-center Experience.
Adachi, T; Eguchi, S; Enjoji, T; Hidaka, M; Inoue, Y; Ito, S; Kanetaka, K; Kobayashi, K; Kosaka, T; Kuba, S; Okada, S; Takatsuki, M; Tetsuo, H; Torashima, Y; Yamaguchi, S; Yamanouchi, K, 2020
)
" In addition, grade 3 and 4 adverse events are found to be higher in panitumumab group than those in control group (RR = 1."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab supplementation for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Chen, S; Chen, X; Tan, C; Wang, C, 2020
)
"Panitumumab supplementation can provide some improvement in objective response for colorectal cancer patients with WT KRAS, but results in the increase in grade 3 and 4 adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab supplementation for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Chen, S; Chen, X; Tan, C; Wang, C, 2020
)
" In 15 patients (40%) 21 serious adverse events related to debulking were reported."( Safety and Feasibility of Additional Tumor Debulking to First-Line Palliative Combination Chemotherapy for Patients with Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Bakkerus, L; Buffart, TE; de Groot, JB; Gootjes, EC; Grunhagen, DJ; Haasbeek, CJA; Hendriks, MP; Labots, M; Meijerink, MR; Nuyttens, JJME; Ten Tije, AJ; Tuynman, JB; van de Ven, PM; van der Stok, EP; van Meerten, E; Verheul, HMW; Verhoef, C; Zonderhuis, BM, 2020
)
"Tumor debulking is feasible and does not prohibit administration of palliative chemotherapy in the majority of patients with multiorgan mCRC, despite the occurrence of serious adverse events related to local treatment."( Safety and Feasibility of Additional Tumor Debulking to First-Line Palliative Combination Chemotherapy for Patients with Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Bakkerus, L; Buffart, TE; de Groot, JB; Gootjes, EC; Grunhagen, DJ; Haasbeek, CJA; Hendriks, MP; Labots, M; Meijerink, MR; Nuyttens, JJME; Ten Tije, AJ; Tuynman, JB; van de Ven, PM; van der Stok, EP; van Meerten, E; Verheul, HMW; Verhoef, C; Zonderhuis, BM, 2020
)
"This first prospective randomized trial on tumor debulking in addition to chemotherapy shows that local treatment of metastases is feasible in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer and does not prohibit administration of palliative systemic therapy, despite the occurrence of serious adverse events related to local treatment."( Safety and Feasibility of Additional Tumor Debulking to First-Line Palliative Combination Chemotherapy for Patients with Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Bakkerus, L; Buffart, TE; de Groot, JB; Gootjes, EC; Grunhagen, DJ; Haasbeek, CJA; Hendriks, MP; Labots, M; Meijerink, MR; Nuyttens, JJME; Ten Tije, AJ; Tuynman, JB; van de Ven, PM; van der Stok, EP; van Meerten, E; Verheul, HMW; Verhoef, C; Zonderhuis, BM, 2020
)
" There was no association between IVS14 + 1 G > A polymorphism and the occurrence of adverse reactions."( Evaluation of adverse effects of chemotherapy regimens of 5-fluoropyrimidines derivatives and their association with DPYD polymorphisms in colorectal cancer patients.
Abdhaghighi, MJ; Jalali, H; Janbabaei, G; Negarandeh, R; Nosrati, A; Saghafi, F; Salehifar, E, 2020
)
"FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were the most common regimens in CRC patients and their toxicity profile was different in some adverse reactions."( Evaluation of adverse effects of chemotherapy regimens of 5-fluoropyrimidines derivatives and their association with DPYD polymorphisms in colorectal cancer patients.
Abdhaghighi, MJ; Jalali, H; Janbabaei, G; Negarandeh, R; Nosrati, A; Saghafi, F; Salehifar, E, 2020
)
" No toxic death was observed."( Safety and Efficacy of Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, Capecitabine, Cisplatin as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After FOLFIRINOX.
Bengrine, L; Fumet, JD; Ghiringhelli, F; Granconato, L; Hennequin, A; Palmier, R; Vincent, J, 2020
)
" A latent class analysis defined the unobserved latent constructs that can be predicted as symptom clusters, considering the intensity of four types of adverse events (AEs)."( Impact of adjuvant therapy toxicity on quality of life and emotional symptoms in patients with colon cancer: a latent class analysis.
Cacho Lavin, D; Calderón, C; Carmona-Bayonas, A; Gomez, D; Jimenez-Fonseca, P; Martinez Cabañez, R; Muñoz, MM, 2021
)
" We weekly applied the orofacial section of the Acute and Chronic Neuropathy Questionnaire of Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute of the United States of America (Oxaliplatin-specific neurotoxicity scale)."( FLOX (5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy for colorectal cancer leads to long-term orofacial neurotoxicity: a STROBE-guided longitudinal prospective study.
Costa, BA; da Rocha Filho, DR; de Albuquerque Ribeiro Gondinho, P; de Barros Silva, PG; Gifoni, MAC; Junior, RCPL; Lima, MVA; Lisboa, MRP; Vale, ML, 2020
)
"The strategy of monitoring MTX concentration at 54 h was safe in our cohort."( Safe administration of high-dose methotrexate with minimal drug level monitoring: Experience from a center in north India.
Dhingra, H; Kalra, M; Mahajan, A, 2020
)
" Whether a patient who experienced a major cardiac side effect from 5-FU can be safely rechallenged with this drug is a clinical dilemma."( 5-Fluorouracil Rechallenge After Cardiotoxicity.
Almnajam, M; Desai, A; Kim, AS; Mohammed, T; Patel, KN, 2020
)
" Adverse event data collection is recorded at every visit."( Efficacy and safety-in analysis of short-course radiation followed by mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.
Al Awabdeh, T; Al Darazi, M; Al Masri, M; Alqasem, K; Amarin, R; Charafeddine, M; Dabous, A; Daoud, F; Deeba, S; El Husseini, Z; Elkhaldi, M; Geara, F; Hushki, A; Jaber, O; Jamali, F; Kattan, J; Khalifeh, I; Kreidieh, M; Mohamad, I; Mukherji, D; Shamseddine, A; Temraz, S; Turfa, R; Zeidan, YH, 2020
)
" The protocol regimen was well tolerated with no serious adverse events of grade 4 reported."( Efficacy and safety-in analysis of short-course radiation followed by mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.
Al Awabdeh, T; Al Darazi, M; Al Masri, M; Alqasem, K; Amarin, R; Charafeddine, M; Dabous, A; Daoud, F; Deeba, S; El Husseini, Z; Elkhaldi, M; Geara, F; Hushki, A; Jaber, O; Jamali, F; Kattan, J; Khalifeh, I; Kreidieh, M; Mohamad, I; Mukherji, D; Shamseddine, A; Temraz, S; Turfa, R; Zeidan, YH, 2020
)
"In patients with LARC, neoadjuvant radiation followed by mFOLFOX6 with avelumab is safe with a promising pathologic response rate."( Efficacy and safety-in analysis of short-course radiation followed by mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.
Al Awabdeh, T; Al Darazi, M; Al Masri, M; Alqasem, K; Amarin, R; Charafeddine, M; Dabous, A; Daoud, F; Deeba, S; El Husseini, Z; Elkhaldi, M; Geara, F; Hushki, A; Jaber, O; Jamali, F; Kattan, J; Khalifeh, I; Kreidieh, M; Mohamad, I; Mukherji, D; Shamseddine, A; Temraz, S; Turfa, R; Zeidan, YH, 2020
)
" We evaluated the associations between the UGT1A1 genotype linked to adverse events-caused by irinotecan-and the efficacy and safety of mXELIRI and FOLFIRI."( Impact of UGT1A1 genotype on the efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ahn, JB; Bai, L; Cho, SH; Fang, WJ; Han, SW; Hong, YS; Iwasa, S; Kim, TW; Kotaka, M; Lee, KW; Matsuoka, H; Morita, S; Muro, K; Nakamura, M; Nishina, T; Park, YS; Sakamoto, J; Yamada, Y; Yuan, XL; Yuan, Y; Zhang, DS, 2021
)
" And the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions (OR = 1."( The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, D; Liu, W; Wang, X; You, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, S, 2021
)
"BEV combined with the FOLFOX regimen is more effective than the FOLFOX regimen alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, but it may also increase the risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions."( The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, D; Liu, W; Wang, X; You, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, S, 2021
)
" Patients exhibiting EWL had worse survival and higher frequencies of adverse events."( Early weight loss is an independent risk factor for shorter survival and increased side effects in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing first-line treatment within the randomized Phase III trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306).
Algül, H; Decker, T; Erickson, NT; Gesenhues, AB; Heinemann, V; Heintges, T; Höffkes, HG; Holch, JW; Kahl, C; Kaiser, F; Kiani, A; Kullmann, F; Lerch, MM; Link, H; Liu, L; Michl, M; Modest, DP; Moehler, M; Ricard, I; Scheithauer, W; Stintzing, S; Theurich, S; von Weikersthal, LF, 2022
)
" Its use may associate with adverse effects presumably originating from folate deficiency."( Rescuing effect of folates on methotrexate cytotoxicity in human trophoblast cells.
Ravaei, A; Rubini, M, 2022
)
"Despite the general acceptance of administering FA to prevent adverse events of MTX therapy, our findings suggest that FA may not be optimal, and indicate FTHF or MTHF as a better choice."( Rescuing effect of folates on methotrexate cytotoxicity in human trophoblast cells.
Ravaei, A; Rubini, M, 2022
)
" Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequently observed in group O (90 vs."( Comparison of safety and efficacy of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) and modified FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: data from clinical practice.
Aoyama, T; Kazama, K; Numata, M; Oshima, T; Rino, Y; Sato, M; Sato, S; Shiozawa, M; Sugano, N; Tamagawa, H; Uchiyama, M; Yukawa, N, 2022
)
"Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used to forecast clinical outcomes or drug adverse effects by analyzing different data sets such as electronic health records, diagnostic data, and molecular data."( Machine Learning Application in a Phase I Clinical Trial Allows for the Identification of Clinical-Biomolecular Markers Significantly Associated With Toxicity.
Bedon, L; Buonadonna, A; Cecchin, E; Dal Bo, M; Fabbiani, E; Polano, M; Toffoli, G, 2022
)
"Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy is an established safe and efficacious regimen for the treatment of mCRC as second-line chemotherapy."( Safety and efficacy review of aflibercept for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chau, I; Lau, DK; Mencel, J, 2022
)
" Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4."( Feasibility and Safety of Oxaliplatin-Based Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy With or Without Intraoperative Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study.
Alyami, M; Bakrin, N; Bardet, SM; Dumont, F; Durand Fontanier, S; Eveno, C; Gagniere, J; Glehen, O; Hübner, M; Pache, B; Pocard, M; Quenet, F; Sgarbura, O; Taibi, A; Teixeira Farinha, H; Thibaudeau, E, 2022
)
" A total of 514 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 134 patients, of which 206 (49."( Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received oxaliplatin-containing regimen.
Ahn, MS; Bae, BN; Baik, SH; Beom, SH; Han, SW; Jeon, SY; Jo, HJ; Kang, MH; Kim, DH; Kim, HK; Kim, JG; Kim, JH; Kim, JS; Kim, JY; Lee, MA; Lee, S; Oh, J; Park, I; Park, YS; Shin, SH; Yoon, JA; Zang, DY, 2023
)
"Chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) can negatively impact the care of patients."( Real-world safety and supportive care use of second-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cockrum, P; Kim, G; Surinach, A; Wainberg, Z; Wang, S, 2022
)
"In patients with mPDAC who received second-line therapy, those who received liposomal irinotecan-based regimens had the lowest rates of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia compared to FOLFIRI, FOLFIRINOX, and FOLFOX, while requiring a similar or lower level of medication to treat and manage those adverse events."( Real-world safety and supportive care use of second-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cockrum, P; Kim, G; Surinach, A; Wainberg, Z; Wang, S, 2022
)
" Patient characteristics were evaluated with multiple regression analyses for survival outcomes, using the Cox proportional hazard model and linear regression analyses for the worst grade of adverse events."( Impact of chronological age on efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in older non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of individual data from two phase II studies of patients aged >75 years.
Amagai, K; Bando, Y; Denda, T; Endo, S; Hatachi, Y; Hyodo, I; Ikezawa, K; Ishida, H; Kobayashi, K; Kuramochi, H; Morimoto, M; Moriwaki, T; Nakajima, G; Negoro, Y; Nishina, T; Sakai, Y; Sato, M; Shimada, M; Tsuji, A; Yamamoto, Y, 2022
)
" The study treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 19 patients (18."( Impact of chronological age on efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in older non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of individual data from two phase II studies of patients aged >75 years.
Amagai, K; Bando, Y; Denda, T; Endo, S; Hatachi, Y; Hyodo, I; Ikezawa, K; Ishida, H; Kobayashi, K; Kuramochi, H; Morimoto, M; Moriwaki, T; Nakajima, G; Negoro, Y; Nishina, T; Sakai, Y; Sato, M; Shimada, M; Tsuji, A; Yamamoto, Y, 2022
)
"The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab was age-independent in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥75 years, and attention should be paid to non-hematologic adverse events as age increases."( Impact of chronological age on efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in older non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of individual data from two phase II studies of patients aged >75 years.
Amagai, K; Bando, Y; Denda, T; Endo, S; Hatachi, Y; Hyodo, I; Ikezawa, K; Ishida, H; Kobayashi, K; Kuramochi, H; Morimoto, M; Moriwaki, T; Nakajima, G; Negoro, Y; Nishina, T; Sakai, Y; Sato, M; Shimada, M; Tsuji, A; Yamamoto, Y, 2022
)
" Pooled analyses for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) were undertaken."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, X; Lu, W; Tang, K; Wang, L, 2022
)
" However, grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequently reported in patients administered FOLFIRINOX compared with the other three regimens."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, X; Lu, W; Tang, K; Wang, L, 2022
)
" The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were: asthenia (21."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen.
Alonso de Castro, B; Cameselle García, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; De la Cámara Gómez, JC; Fernández-Montes, A; Gómez-Randulfe Rodríguez, MI; González Villarroel, P; Martínez-Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; Romero Reinoso, C; Salgado Fernández, M; Vidal Insua, Y, 2022
)
" We followed up these patients and analyzed the relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and chemotherapy-induced adverse events (AEs)."( A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Modified FOLFIRINOX with S-1 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in 71 Patients with Resected Pancreatic Carcinoma.
Dai, H; Feng, W; Tang, C; Yao, L, 2022
)
" The rate of adverse reactions such as hematological toxicity, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nonhematological toxicity, vomiting, fatigue, infection, diarrhea, intestinal obstruction, and peripheral neuropathy was lower in 10."( Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient Survival of PDL1/PD-1 Inhibitors versus FOLFIRINOX Regimens for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Dai, S; Jiang, C; Wu, Z; Zhou, L, 2022
)
"PDL1/PD-1 inhibitors in combination with FOLFIRINOX regimens have shown longer survival than treatment with FOLFIRINOX regimens for pancreatic cancer patients, with reliable clinical efficacy, tolerable adverse effects, and a high safety profile for patients."( Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient Survival of PDL1/PD-1 Inhibitors versus FOLFIRINOX Regimens for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Dai, S; Jiang, C; Wu, Z; Zhou, L, 2022
)
" Treatment regimens, body surface area, dosage, number of treatment courses, and adverse events( AEs) were evaluated."( [Comparative Safety Assessment of Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in Second- and Later-Line Treatment in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma].
Iwai, M; Kimura, M; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2022
)
" The prognosis, predictive factors (including systemic inflammation-based prognostic indicators), and adverse events were investigated."( Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Nano-Liposomal Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin in Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Study.
Aihara, R; Araki, K; Hatanaka, T; Hosaka, H; Hoshino, T; Hosouchi, Y; Ijima, M; Ishida, F; Ishii, N; Kakizaki, S; Kobatake, T; Kurihara, E; Naganuma, A; Shirabe, K; Suzuki, Y; Tamura, Y; Uraoka, T; Yasuoka, H; Yoshida, S, 2022
)
" Adverse events were manageable, although gastrointestinal symptoms and neutropenia were observed."( Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Nano-Liposomal Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin in Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Study.
Aihara, R; Araki, K; Hatanaka, T; Hosaka, H; Hoshino, T; Hosouchi, Y; Ijima, M; Ishida, F; Ishii, N; Kakizaki, S; Kobatake, T; Kurihara, E; Naganuma, A; Shirabe, K; Suzuki, Y; Tamura, Y; Uraoka, T; Yasuoka, H; Yoshida, S, 2022
)
" The adverse events were also analyzed."( Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Gao, L; Liu, X; Ma, X; Ou, K; Wang, Q; Yang, L; Zhang, H, 2022
)
" The incidence of any grade of adverse events (AEs) was 96."( Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Gao, L; Liu, X; Ma, X; Ou, K; Wang, Q; Yang, L; Zhang, H, 2022
)
" This series highlights the importance of thorough counseling for patients regarding the course of disease for which methotrexate is prescribed and the dosing, schedule, and adverse effects that are associated with methotrexate."( Methotrexate Toxicity: A Case Series from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India.
Bhardwaj, N; Chauhan, P; Jindal, R; Roy, S, 2022
)
" The criteria  for the inclusion of studies were previously defined based on the two secondary goals addressed in this review: 1) To analyze the magnitude of the differences  in clinical responses and 2) To study the magnitude of the differences in  adverse effects of irinotecan at high doses, as compared to the doses  described in the summary of product characteristics corresponding to the  FOLFIRI regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with genotypes  UGT1A1*1/* 1 or *1/*28."( Efficacy and safety of high doses of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with the FOLFIRI regimen based on the UGT1A1 genotype: A systematic review.
García-Gil, S; Gutiérrez-Nicolás, F; Miarons, M; Riera, P, 2022
)
"Our results provide preliminary evidence that HAIC based on FOLFIRI regimen is efficient and safe in some patients progressing after previous treatment."( The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Based on FOLFIRI for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma as Second-Line and Successive Treatment: A Real-World Study.
Chen, Y; Huang, P; Huang, X; Shi, G; Sun, Q; Yang, G; Zhou, Y, 2022
)
" Most commonly, it is associated with coronary vasospasm secondary to direct toxic effects on vascular endothelium."( Managing life-threatening 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.
Boldig, K; Ganguly, A; Kadakia, M; Rohatgi, A, 2022
)
" However, severe adverse effects due to irinotecan have been observed even in patients who do not harbor UGT1A1*28 or *6."( Association between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the R3HCC1 gene and irinotecan toxicity.
Hamamoto, Y; Hazama, S; Iida, M; Ioka, T; Kanesada, K; Matsui, H; Nagano, H; Ogihara, H; Shindo, Y; Suzuki, N; Takeda, S; Tokumitsu, Y; Tsunedomi, R; Yoshida, S, 2023
)
"We analyzed the incidence, time to first onset, and time to resolution for adverse events that require special attention and other selected toxicities in the nal-IRI combination group (n = 46)."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
"3%) were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events, with a median time to onset of 21."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
" Although the treatment-emergent adverse events occurred were controllable, patients with prolonged toxicities should be closely managed."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
" It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial."( Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group.
Acar, R; Akbas, S; Akinci, MB; Araz, M; Arslan, C; Artac, M; Bahceci, A; Bilgetekin, I; Bilici, A; Cakir, E; Celik, E; Cilbir, E; Cincin, I; Dede, DS; Demirkiran, A; Deniz, GI; Dogan, I; Erdem, D; Erdogan, AP; Eren, OO; Erol, C; Garbioglu, DB; Gulmez, A; Hacibekiroglu, I; Hamdard, J; Hizal, M; Inal, A; Kahraman, S; Kaya, AO; Koca, S; Kubilay, P; Kucukarda, A; Kut, E; Mandel, NM; Menekse, S; Nayir, E; Oksuzoglu, B; On, S; Oyman, A; Ozyukseler, DT; Paydas, S; Sakin, A; Sen, E; Sendur Mehmet, AN; Sevinc, A; Taskaynatan, H; Tastekin, D; Turhal, S; Uncu, D; Yalcin, B; Yildirim, ME, 2022
)
"Our meta-analysis shows that the aflibercept plus FOLFIRI combination shows better survival efficacies however; it is also associated with more high-grade adverse events."( A systemic review and meta-analysis of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI regimen as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A PRISMA compliant pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials and single arm studies to assess efficacy and safety.
Chorawala, MR; Patel, RS; Thakur, A, 2023
)
"In clinical trials, the assessment of safety is traditionally focused on the overall rate of high-grade and serious adverse events (AEs)."( Adverse events during first-line treatments for mCRC: The Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of three randomised trials.
Boccaccino, A; Bustreo, S; Carullo, M; Clavarezza, M; Cremolini, C; Cupini, S; Daniel, F; Libertini, M; Lonardi, S; Morano, F; Niger, M; Palermo, F; Pietrantonio, F; Procaccio, L; Raimondi, A; Rossini, D; Santini, D; Tomasello, G; Zaniboni, A, 2023
)
"We reported a patient with rheumatoid arthritis who received chronic methotrexate (MTX) therapy and experienced several adverse reactions like hemocytopenia and renal impairment."( Calcium Folate for Reducing the Side Effects of Low-dose Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report.
Hu, Y; Liu, R; Liu, X; Yan, Q, 2024
)
"A 66-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis received MTX and developed adverse effects of bone marrow suppression, like pancytopenia."( Calcium Folate for Reducing the Side Effects of Low-dose Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report.
Hu, Y; Liu, R; Liu, X; Yan, Q, 2024
)
"Low-dose MTX has fewer adverse reactions but may cause bone marrow suppression- related side effects."( Calcium Folate for Reducing the Side Effects of Low-dose Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report.
Hu, Y; Liu, R; Liu, X; Yan, Q, 2024
)
"The incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events in colorectal cancer patients with renal insufficiency has been compared to patients with normal renal function in only a few studies."( Feasibility and Safety of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Five Japanese Large-scale Clinical Trials.
Aoyama, T; Honda, M; Kanda, M; Kashiwabara, K; Maeda, H; Mayanagi, S; Muto, M; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Tanaka, K; Yamagishi, H; Yoshikawa, T, 2023
)
"As Grade 3 adverse events, hematological toxicities, such as neutropenia and anemia, and gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea and vomiting, were significantly more frequent in the L3-4 group."( Feasibility and Safety of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Five Japanese Large-scale Clinical Trials.
Aoyama, T; Honda, M; Kanda, M; Kashiwabara, K; Maeda, H; Mayanagi, S; Muto, M; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Tanaka, K; Yamagishi, H; Yoshikawa, T, 2023
)
" Since adverse events have the potential to shorten the duration of treatment, especially when using chemotherapy without oxaliplatin, careful management, including dose reduction, may be important in patients with renal insufficiency."( Feasibility and Safety of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Five Japanese Large-scale Clinical Trials.
Aoyama, T; Honda, M; Kanda, M; Kashiwabara, K; Maeda, H; Mayanagi, S; Muto, M; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Tanaka, K; Yamagishi, H; Yoshikawa, T, 2023
)
" Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy."( Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212
Alig, AHS; Caca, K; Fruehauf, S; Goekkurt, E; Graeven, U; Haas, S; Heinemann, V; Heinrich, K; Held, S; Karthaus, M; König, AO; Kretzschmar, A; Kurreck, A; Modest, DP; Mueller, L; Sommerhäuser, G; Stahler, A; Stintzing, S; Trarbach, T; von Weikersthal, LF, 2023
)
" Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events."( Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212
Alig, AHS; Caca, K; Fruehauf, S; Goekkurt, E; Graeven, U; Haas, S; Heinemann, V; Heinrich, K; Held, S; Karthaus, M; König, AO; Kretzschmar, A; Kurreck, A; Modest, DP; Mueller, L; Sommerhäuser, G; Stahler, A; Stintzing, S; Trarbach, T; von Weikersthal, LF, 2023
)
" Sixty-four patients (41%) treated with INCT-CRT and 57 CRT-CNCT patients (34%) experienced a grade 3+ adverse event (P = ."( Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Trial.
Garcia-Aguilar, J; Kim, JK; Lin, ST; Omer, DM; Qin, LX; Saltz, LB; Thompson, HM; Valdivieso, SC; Verheij, FS; Wu, AJ; Yuval, JB, 2024
)
" No difference in adverse events was observed between groups."( Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Trial.
Garcia-Aguilar, J; Kim, JK; Lin, ST; Omer, DM; Qin, LX; Saltz, LB; Thompson, HM; Valdivieso, SC; Verheij, FS; Wu, AJ; Yuval, JB, 2024
)
" Number of cycles, dose delays for any cause, and dose reductions for adverse events (AEs) were comparable between age classes."( Quality of life, effectiveness, and safety of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of the prospective QoLiTrap study.
Anchisi, S; Bohanes, P; Derigs, HG; Geffriaud-Ricouard, C; Grünberger, B; Gueldner, M; Hofheinz, RD; Piringer, G; Scholten, F; Schwarz, L; Thaler, J; von Moos, R, 2023
)

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReference
" The half-life of MTX in the CSF (11."( Weekly methotrexate-calcium leucovorin rescue: effect of alkalinization on nephrotoxicity; pharmacokinetics in the CNS; and use in CNS non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Frei, E; Pitman, SW, 1977
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis shows that a biexponential function adequately describes the plasma decay for all doses."( Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue.
Aroesty, J; Block, JB; Isacoff, WH; Lincoln, TL; Morrison, PF; Willis, KL, 1977
)
" Children excrete methotrexate at a faster rate than adults; the half-life of MTX during the first phase of plasma clearance curve is one hour shorter in children."( Degradation and clearance of methotrexate in children with osteosarcoma receiving high-dose infusion.
Kim, PY; Lantin, E; Romsdahl, MM; Sutow, WW; van Eys, DC; Wang, YM, 1978
)
"The general basis of pharmacokinetics are summarized with the clinical aims of a better utilisation of drugs by the application pharmacokinetic data."( [Pharmacokinetics of antineoplastic agents (author's transl)].
Cano, JP; Carcassonne, Y; Meyer, G, 1979
)
"The administration of calcium leucovorin, either concurrently or after high dosages of methotrexate in L1210 leukemic mice, has both pharmacokinetic and biochemical effects in tumor cells and drug-limiting proliferative normal tissue in small intestine."( Biochemical and pharmacokinetic effects of leucovorin after high-dose methotrexate in a murine leukemia model.
Donsbach, RC; Dorick, DM; Moccio, DM; Sirotnak, FM, 1976
)
" In the present study the pharmacokinetic behavior of 5-FU was investigated in combination with interferon alfa (IFN-alpha-2b) and further after adding the second well-established biomodulating agent folinic acid (FA)."( Influence of interferon alfa-2b with or without folinic acid on pharmacokinetics of fluorouracil.
Czejka, MJ; Fogl, U; Jäger, W; Micksche, M; Schernthaner, G; Schüller, J, 1992
)
" The present study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous and intra-hepatic arterial infusions of folinic acid in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 6) who were being treated with weekly regional infusions of 5-FU."( A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid.
Anderson, JH; Cooke, TG; Kerr, DJ; McArdle, CS; Setanoians, A, 1992
)
" The 7-OHMTX level increased during each infusion and a Cmax of 19 mumol."( Pharmacokinetic study of methotrexate, folinic acid and their serum metabolites in children treated with high-dose methotrexate and leucovorin rescue.
Breithaupt, H; Hartmann, R; Henze, G; Hepp, R; Wolfrom, C, 1990
)
" Plasma samples were obtained during and after infusions at appropriate times for a comprehensive pharmacokinetic study of each drug."( Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion of methotrexate and teniposide in pediatric cancer patients.
Evans, WE; Kavanagh, RL; Ochs, J; Rivera, GK; Rodman, JH; Sunderland, M; Yalowich, J, 1990
)
" The measured MTX peak concentrations correlated closely with pharmacokinetic data such as area under the curve and total body clearance."( [The effect of methotrexate pharmacokinetics and of leucovorin rescue on the prognosis of osteosarcoma].
Graf, N; Jost, W; Keller, HE; Müller, J; Sitzmann, FC,
)
"After the use of d,1-folinic acid (d,1-CHO-THF), pharmacokinetic measurements should take into account 1-CHO-THF and its metabolite 1-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (1-CH3-THF) as well as d-CHO-THF."( Pharmacokinetics of reduced folates after short-term infusion of d, 1-folinic acid.
Kühl, M; Nüssler, V; Schalhorn, A; Stupp-Poutot, G, 1990
)
" After administration of high doses of LV intravenously, conversion of (6S) LV to 5-CH3 THF was saturable, as indicated by the prolonged (6S) LV half-life of 58 minutes and the slow (6S) LV clearance of 119."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of high-dose leucovorin calcium after intravenous and oral administration.
Ratain, MJ; Schilsky, RL, 1990
)
" Along with other plasma pharmacokinetic parameters, terminal half-lives were estimated for (6S)-folinic acid (median, 45."( Pharmacokinetics of diastereoisomers of (6R,S)-folinic acid (leucovorin) in humans during constant high-dose intravenous infusion.
Doroshow, JH; Newman, EM; Straw, JA, 1989
)
" The bioavailability of intravenous and intramuscular doses was comparable based on area under the serum concentration-time curve, although for intramuscular administration, the peak concentration was lower and the time to peak concentration was longer."( Pharmacokinetics of leucovorin calcium after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration.
Gutierrez, ML; Leese, PT; McGuire, BW; Sia, LL; Stokstad, EL, 1988
)
" The longer duration of MTX administration (with delayed rescue) is thought to be more beneficial from the pharmacokinetic aspect."( Methotrexate administered by 6-h and 24-h infusion: a pharmacokinetic comparison.
Borsi, JD; Moe, PJ; Schuler, D, 1988
)
"Studies are described that sought the basis for a discrepancy in values for a key kinetic parameter of methotrexate transport (influx Vmax) in L1210 cells derived alternately from biochemical or pharmacokinetic measurements."( Enhancement of folate analogue transport inward in L1210 cells during methotrexate therapy of leukemic mice: evidence of the nature of the effect, possible host mediation, and pharmacokinetic significance.
Barrueco, JR; Poser, RE; Sirotnak, FM, 1987
)
" Methotrexate and 7-hydroxy-methotrexate concentrations were measured by specific radioimmunoassays and the data were analysed simultaneously by an integrated pharmacokinetic model."( Methotrexate and 7-hydroxy-methotrexate pharmacokinetics following intravenous bolus administration and high-dose infusion of methotrexate.
Bore, P; Bruno, R; Cano, JP; Favre, R; Lena, N, 1987
)
" In both studies the plasma half-life (t1/2) of the active isomer, L-formyltetrahydrofolate (CHO-THF), was only 32 to 35 minutes, whereas the inactive isomer, D-CHO-THF had a plasma t 1/2 of 352 to 485 minutes."( Pharmacokinetics of leucovorin (D,L-5-formyltetrahydrofolate) after intravenous injection and constant intravenous infusion.
Doroshow, JH; Newman, EM; Straw, JA, 1987
)
" The plasma half-life (beta) of the unnatural (d) isomer was 451 +/- 24 (S."( Pharmacokinetics of the diastereoisomers of leucovorin after intravenous and oral administration to normal subjects.
Straw, JA; Szapary, D; Wynn, WT, 1984
)
" The natural (l) isomer had a half-life (beta) of 47 +/- 4 (S."( Differences in the pharmacokinetics of the diastereoisomers of citrovorum factor in dogs.
Covey, JM; Straw, JA; Szapary, D, 1981
)
" Pharmacokinetic models were fit to plasma ZDV concentrations using extended least squares regression."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose zidovudine administered as a continuous infusion in patients with cancer.
Darnowski, J; Dudley, MN; Marchbanks, K; Posner, MR,
)
" Further study of potential nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior at doses above 20 g/m2/day is necessary."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose zidovudine administered as a continuous infusion in patients with cancer.
Darnowski, J; Dudley, MN; Marchbanks, K; Posner, MR,
)
" The tolerance and pharmacokinetic profile of IP 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine(FUDR) alone and with (R,S)-leucovorin ((R,S)-LV) have each been evaluated in previous phase I studies."( Intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR) and (S)-leucovorin for disease predominantly confined to the peritoneal cavity: a pharmacokinetic and toxicity study.
Chan, KK; Israel, VK; Jeffers, S; Jiang, C; Leichman, CG; Leichman, L; Morrow, CP; Muggia, FM; Roman, L; Tulpule, A, 1995
)
"To analyze clinical and pharmacokinetic data of cisplatin (CP)/fluorouracil (FU)/l folinic acid (l FA) chemotherapy administered as first-line treatment to locally advanced head and neck cancer patients."( Phase II trial of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and pure folinic acid for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a pharmacokinetic and clinical survey.
Dassonville, O; Demard, F; Etienne, MC; Guillot, T; Milano, G; Mobayen, H; Otto, J; Saudes, L; Schneider, M; Thyss, A, 1995
)
"This study highlights the efficacy of CP/FU/l FA in head and neck carcinoma and establishes the clinical importance of coupled FU/FA pharmacokinetics to predict pharmacodynamic variability."( Phase II trial of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and pure folinic acid for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a pharmacokinetic and clinical survey.
Dassonville, O; Demard, F; Etienne, MC; Guillot, T; Milano, G; Mobayen, H; Otto, J; Saudes, L; Schneider, M; Thyss, A, 1995
)
" In contrary, the coadministration of either FA or DPM or FA/DPM to 5FU does not lead to a significant change in the pharmacokinetic profile of 5FU, but also causes higher plasma concentrations."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil. Influence of the biomodulating agents interferon, dipyridamole and folinic acid alone and in combination.
Czejka, MJ; Fogl, U; Jäger, W; Schernthaner, G; Schüller, J; Weiss, C, 1993
)
" Minimum Akaike information criterion estimation was used to determine the simplest effective pharmacokinetic model."( Lack of effect of interferon alpha 2a upon fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.
Joel, SP; Johnston, A; Patel, N; Seymour, MT; Slevin, ML, 1994
)
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of folinic acid (FA) and its active metabolite, 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, were studied after oral administration of decreasing doses of calcium folinate during 37 courses of high and intermediate dose methotrexate treatment in 25 lymphoma patients."( Pharmacokinetics of folinic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic metabolite after repeated oral administration of calcium folinate following methotrexate treatment.
Cano, J; Carcassonne, Y; Catalin, J; Lejeune, C; Monjanel-Mouterde, S; Payet, B; Tubiana-Mathieu, N, 1994
)
" Pharmacokinetic parameters showed very wide interpatient variability."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of floxuridine/leucovorin given on the Roswell Park weekly regimen.
Creaven, PJ; Frank, C; Levine, EG; Meropol, NJ; Petrelli, NJ; Proefrock, A; Raghavan, D; Rodriguez-Bigas, M; Rustum, YM; Udvary-Nagy, S, 1994
)
" The pharmacokinetic advantage of 5-FU-ip was confirmed in our study (ratio AUC peritoneum/plasma between 160 and 328)."( [Continuous double administration of 5 fluorouracil (intravenous and intraperitoneal) modulated by folinic acid: phase I clinical study and pharmacokinetics in patients with intra-abdominal developing cancers].
Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chevreau, C; de Forni, M; Gualano, V; Izar-Soum, F; Martel, P; Roché, H; Soulié, P, 1993
)
"LV-6S exhibits pharmacokinetic patterns similar to those obtained with LV-6R,S whatever the route used, oral or intravenous."( Pharmacokinetics and in vitro studies of l-leucovorin. Comparison with the d and d,l-leucovorin.
Zittoun, J, 1993
)
" The pharmacokinetic interaction between alpha-IF and LV may play a role in the activity of this regimen."( Phase I-II study of the addition of alpha-2a interferon to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Pharmacokinetic interaction of alpha-2a interferon and leucovorin.
Buter, J; de Vries, EG; Mulder, NH; Roenhorst, HW; Sinnige, HA; Sleijfer, DT; Uges, DR; Verschueren, RC; Willemse, PH, 1993
)
"The pharmacokinetic values of d,l-leucovorin and l-leucovorin were compared in eight healthy volunteers following oral administration of 25 mg d,l-leucovorin and 12."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of leucovorin and levoleucovorin.
De Gialluly, E; Hancock, C; Johnson, JB; Marquet, J; Tonelli, AP; Yacobi, A; Zittoun, J, 1993
)
"A phase I and pharmacokinetic trial was performed between October 1993 and June 1994 to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of fluorouracil (5-FU) and intravenous (IV) leucovorin (folinic acid; FA) in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of leucovorin and infusional hepatic arterial fluorouracil.
Buckels, J; Budden, J; Doughty, J; Kerr, DJ; Ledermann, JA; McArdle, CS; Neoptolemos, J; Seymour, M; Taylor, I, 1995
)
" Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to determine peak and steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of 5-FU."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of leucovorin and infusional hepatic arterial fluorouracil.
Buckels, J; Budden, J; Doughty, J; Kerr, DJ; Ledermann, JA; McArdle, CS; Neoptolemos, J; Seymour, M; Taylor, I, 1995
)
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between fluorouracil (5-FU) and the biomodulating agent interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma."( Pharmacokinetic interaction of 5-fluorouracil and interferon alpha-2b with or without folinic acid.
b1p6uller, J; Czejka, M, 1995
)
" Pharmacokinetic parameters [ftorafur, uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate] showed wide interpatient variations."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer.
Creaven, PJ; Frank, C; Ho, DH; Kurowski, M; Meropol, NJ; Petrelli, NJ; Rodriguez-Bigas, M; Rustum, YM, 1996
)
" These results show that there is no pharmacokinetic advantage to the use of 6S-LV rather than 6R,S-LV as a modulator of 5-FU."( A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of 6S-leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil in patient with colorectal carcinoma.
Berghorn, E; Blumenson, LE; Creaven, PJ; Frank, C; Meropol, NJ; Petrelli, NJ; Rodriguez-Bigas, M; Rustum, YM, 1995
)
" On day 1 of treatment, CPT-11 alone was given by 90-minute infusion, and pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over 24 hours."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Berkery, R; Dietz, A; Eng, M; Kanowitz, J; Kelsen, DP; Kemeny, NE; Locker, P; Saltz, LB; Schaaf, L; Spriggs, D; Staton, BA; Steger, C, 1996
)
" As a consequence, the preadministration of IFN leads to a significant change in the basic pharmacokinetic parameters of both compounds: the mean area under the concentration-time curve is decreased at 27."( Disposition of 5-formyl- and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid in serum after i.v. bolus of calcium folinate: pharmacokinetic drug interaction with preadministered interferon-alpha-2b.
Bandak, S; Czejka, MJ; Meyer, B; Schüller, J; Simon, D; Weiss, C,
)
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed that single-dose UFT results in maximum plasma levels and an area under the concentration-time curve that increased with escalating UFT doses."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluations of UFT plus oral leucovorin.
Pazdur, R, 1997
)
" Because of laboratory data that suggests improved metabolism of AMT versus methotrexate (MTX) in lymphoblasts, we developed a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of AMT."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of aminopterin in patients with refractory malignancies.
Hum, M; Kamen, BA; Marling-Cason, M; Ratliff, AF; Rose, K; Wilson, J; Winick, N, 1998
)
" In a previous study with 5-FU stepwise dose escalation in a weekly regimen, and pharmacokinetic monitoring, we defined a therapeutic range for 5-FU plasma levels: 2,000 to 3,000 microg/L (area under the concentration-time curve at 0 to 8 hours [AUC0-8], 16 to 24 mg x h/L)."( Long-term weekly treatment of colorectal metastatic cancer with fluorouracil and leucovorin: results of a multicentric prospective trial of fluorouracil dosage optimization by pharmacokinetic monitoring in 152 patients.
Alleaume, C; Boisdron-Celle, M; Burtin, P; Cailleux, PE; Danquechin-Dorval, E; Delva, R; Dumesnil, Y; Fety, R; Gamelin, E; Geslin, J; Gesta, P; Goudier, MJ; Larra, F; Lortholary, A; Maigre, M; Maillart, P; Maillet, ML; Person-Joly, MC; Picon, L; Regimbeau, C; Robert, J; Sire, M, 1998
)
"Individual 5-FU dose adjustment with pharmacokinetic monitoring provided a high survival rate and percentage of responses, with good tolerance."( Long-term weekly treatment of colorectal metastatic cancer with fluorouracil and leucovorin: results of a multicentric prospective trial of fluorouracil dosage optimization by pharmacokinetic monitoring in 152 patients.
Alleaume, C; Boisdron-Celle, M; Burtin, P; Cailleux, PE; Danquechin-Dorval, E; Delva, R; Dumesnil, Y; Fety, R; Gamelin, E; Geslin, J; Gesta, P; Goudier, MJ; Larra, F; Lortholary, A; Maigre, M; Maillart, P; Maillet, ML; Person-Joly, MC; Picon, L; Regimbeau, C; Robert, J; Sire, M, 1998
)
"The cumulative pharmacokinetic pattern of oxaliplatin, a new diamminecyclohexane platinum derivative, was studied in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Cumulative pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin, administered every three weeks, combined with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer patients.
Allain, P; Boisdron-Celle, M; Bouil, AL; Brienza, S; Cailleux, A; Cvitkovic, E; Delva, R; Gamelin, E; Krikorian, A; Larra, F; Robert, J; Turcant, A, 1997
)
" Details are presented here on the methodology of NMRS data acquisition and on their pharmacokinetic analysis."( Non-invasive 19F-NMRS of 5-fluorouracil in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic studies.
Presant, CA; Waluch, V; Wolf, W, 1998
)
"Twenty-one paired pharmacokinetic studies were completed on patients with colorectal, gastric, and hepatocellular cancer, utilizing positron emission tomography (PET), which allowed the acquisition of tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic data and tumor blood flow (TBF) measurements."( Tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of fluorouracil biomodulation with N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate, folinic acid, and interferon alfa.
Brady, F; Brown, G; Harte, RJ; Jones, T; Luthra, SJ; Matthews, JC; O'Reilly, SM; Osman, S; Price, PM; Tilsley, DW, 1999
)
"SFU-dose adaptation optimal schedule using bimonthly LV5FU2 regimen was modulated by previously validated individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in 38 patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Individual 5FU-dose adaptation schedule using bimonthly pharmacokinetically modulated LV5FU2 regimen: a feasibility study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Bressolle, F; Duffour, J; Joulia, JM; Kramar, A; Pinguet, F; Topart, D; Ychou, M,
)
"At the 1st cure, 5F-U pharmacokinetic parameters (particularly the area under curve (AUC) in mg."( Individual 5FU-dose adaptation schedule using bimonthly pharmacokinetically modulated LV5FU2 regimen: a feasibility study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Bressolle, F; Duffour, J; Joulia, JM; Kramar, A; Pinguet, F; Topart, D; Ychou, M,
)
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were conducted to look for a relationship between the ratio of UH(2) to U and 5-FU metabolic outcome and tolerance."( Correlation between uracil and dihydrouracil plasma ratio, fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetic parameters, and tolerance in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A potential interest for predicting 5-FU toxicity and determining optimal 5-FU dosage.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Delva, R; Gamelin, E; Genevieve, F; Guérin-Meyer, V; Ifrah, N; Larra, F; Lortholary, A; Robert, J, 1999
)
" Five patients could not tolerate the treatment even at the lowest dose of interferon and 22 patients were unavailable for the pharmacokinetic analysis because of dose reductions of 5-FU."( A pharmacokinetic study of 5-FU/leucovorin and alpha-interferon in advanced cancer.
Carlsson, G; Glimelius, B; Gustavsson, B; Jeppsson, B; Jönsson, PE; Larsson, PA; Malmberg, M; Svedberg, M, 2000
)
" A single dose of IFNalpha as low as 3 MIU m(-2) can cause sustained elevation of PBL TP activity in vivo indicating that biochemical markers are important pharmacodynamic endpoints for developing optimal schedules of IFNalpha for biomodulation of 5-FU."( Induction of thymidine phosphorylase as a pharmacodynamic end-point in patients with advanced carcinoma treated with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and interferon alpha.
Braybrooke, JP; Ganesan, TS; Harris, AL; Houlbrook, S; Koukourakis, MI; Love, SD; O'Byrne, KJ; Patterson, AV; Propper, DJ; Talbot, DC; Taylor, M; Varcoe, S, 2000
)
"A pharmacokinetic population approach was used to analyze the data from 21 patients with colorectal cancer."( Dose and time dependencies of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Erdociain, E; Féty-Deporte, R; Gamelin, E; Guimbaud, R; Lafont, T; McLeod, HL; Terret, C, 2000
)
" The relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and patient characteristics were tested."( Dose and time dependencies of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Erdociain, E; Féty-Deporte, R; Gamelin, E; Guimbaud, R; Lafont, T; McLeod, HL; Terret, C, 2000
)
"The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in this study would be useful to predict the 5-fluorouracil plasma concentrations following other schedules of administration of 5-fluorouracil and to study the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between 5-fluorouracil and other drugs."( Dose and time dependencies of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Erdociain, E; Féty-Deporte, R; Gamelin, E; Guimbaud, R; Lafont, T; McLeod, HL; Terret, C, 2000
)
"Patients received a single 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (2,300 mg/m(2) on day 2) with leucovorin (15 mg orally [PO] bid on days 1 through 3) to provide reference pharmacokinetic data."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors.
Bi, DQ; Donavan, S; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; Keith, B; Monahan, BP; Morrison, G; Quinn, MG; Shapiro, J; Takimoto, CH; Zentko, S, 2000
)
" After oral administration of 1250 mg/m2, capecitabine is rapidly and extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract [with a time to reach peak concentration (tmax) of 2 hours and peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) of 3 to 4 mg/L] and has a relatively short elimination half-life (t(1/2)) [0."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine.
Blesch, K; Reigner, B; Weidekamm, E, 2001
)
" The mean PK parameters were: terminal half-life of ultrafiltrable platin, 17."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Beckert, B; Beykirch, M; Braess, J; Goecke, E; Hiddemann, W; Kern, W; Lang, N; Schalhorn, A; Stein, J; Stemmler, J; Waggershauser, T, 2001
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle."( Sequence effect of irinotecan and fluorouracil treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Allegrini, G; Comis, S; Conte, P; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Lencioni, M; Masi, G; Pfanner, E, 2001
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40."( Sequence effect of irinotecan and fluorouracil treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Allegrini, G; Comis, S; Conte, P; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Lencioni, M; Masi, G; Pfanner, E, 2001
)
" Because no data are available for patients with severe renal failure, the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU and its catabolites were determined for a patient with colorectal carcinoma and end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis therapy."( Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its catabolites determined by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for a patient on chronic hemodialysis.
Bommer, J; Göggelmann, C; Hull, WE; Rengelshausen, J; Schwenger, V; Walter-Sack, I, 2002
)
" The method was proved to be applicable to the pharmacokinetic study of LV in healthy volunteers after a single oral administration (75 mg)."( High-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of leucovorin in plasma: validation and application to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.
Chen, J; Cheng, WB; Duan, GL; Li, D; Zheng, LX, 2002
)
"A comparison of the intratumoral 5-FU pharmacokinetics indicated that there was no general effect of leucovorin on the intratumoral half-life of 5-FU."( Does leucovorin alter the intratumoral pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)? A Southwest Oncology Group study.
Jacobson, J; Macdonald, JS; Presant, CA; Waluch, V; Weitz, IC; Wolf, W, 2002
)
" Administration of modified pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC) using Leucovorin (intravenous infusion of 5-FU, 600 mg/m2/24 hours; oral administration of UFT, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co."( [A case of multiple liver metastases from colon cancer successfully treated with modified pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy using Leucovorin].
Hatada, T; Inoue, Y; Kobayashi, M; Kusunoki, M; Miki, C; Ojima, E, 2002
)
"Dose adaptation based on pharmacokinetic parameters has been shown to decrease toxicity of some 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)-based continuous infusion regimens."( Relationship between pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in plasma and in saliva, and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid.
Brouwers, JR; Coenen, JL; De Graaf, JC; Jansman, FG; Sleijfer, DT; Tobi, H,
)
"The conclusion of this study is that the application of pharmacokinetic parameters is not appropriate for identification of patients at risk for developing toxicity from treatment with 5-FU according to the Mayo-regimen."( Relationship between pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in plasma and in saliva, and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid.
Brouwers, JR; Coenen, JL; De Graaf, JC; Jansman, FG; Sleijfer, DT; Tobi, H,
)
" Systemic exposure based on plasma concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites was determined using individual parameter estimates derived from a population pharmacokinetic model constructed for this purpose in NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships of capecitabine metabolites in colorectal cancer patients.
Blesch, KS; Burger, HU; Gieschke, R; Reigner, B; Steimer, JL, 2003
)
"The objective of this study was to explore correlations between a variety of covariates and oxaliplatin ultrafilterable and blood pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin.
Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Delord, JP; Grégoire, N; Guimbaud, R; Lafont, T; Umlil, A, 2003
)
"To determine the toxicities and pharmacokinetic effects of eniluracil (EU) given on two weekly dosing schedules with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV)."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral eniluracil, fluorouracil and leucovorin given on a weekly schedule.
Cliatt, J; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Guo, XD; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; McQuigan, EA; Monahan, BP; Nguyen, D; Quinn, MG; Saif, MW; Schuler, B; Szabo, E; Takimoto, CH; Thomas, RR; Wilson, R, 2003
)
" infusion of 5-FU 2300 mg/m(2) to provide a pharmacokinetic reference."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral eniluracil, fluorouracil and leucovorin given on a weekly schedule.
Cliatt, J; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Guo, XD; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; McQuigan, EA; Monahan, BP; Nguyen, D; Quinn, MG; Saif, MW; Schuler, B; Szabo, E; Takimoto, CH; Thomas, RR; Wilson, R, 2003
)
" EU on either schedule decreased 5-FU plasma clearance by 48 to 52-fold, prolonged the half-life to >5 h, and increased the percentage of 5-FU excreted in the urine from 2% to 64-66%."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral eniluracil, fluorouracil and leucovorin given on a weekly schedule.
Cliatt, J; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Guo, XD; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; McQuigan, EA; Monahan, BP; Nguyen, D; Quinn, MG; Saif, MW; Schuler, B; Szabo, E; Takimoto, CH; Thomas, RR; Wilson, R, 2003
)
"Either a single 20-mg dose of EU given prior to or for 3 days around the oral 5-FU dose led to comparable effects on 5-FU pharmacokinetic parameters, and inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral eniluracil, fluorouracil and leucovorin given on a weekly schedule.
Cliatt, J; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Guo, XD; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; McQuigan, EA; Monahan, BP; Nguyen, D; Quinn, MG; Saif, MW; Schuler, B; Szabo, E; Takimoto, CH; Thomas, RR; Wilson, R, 2003
)
"The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and uracil were investigated in order to built a population pharmacokinetic model for the anticancer drug UFT, administered with leucovorin and vinorelbine."( Modelling of ftorafur and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics following oral UFT administration. A population study in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer.
Bonneterre, J; Campone, M; Deporte-Fety, R; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P; Urien, S, 2003
)
"Of the 31 patients treated, 30 were available for the pharmacokinetic analysis."( Modelling of ftorafur and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics following oral UFT administration. A population study in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer.
Bonneterre, J; Campone, M; Deporte-Fety, R; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P; Urien, S, 2003
)
"A pharmacokinetic model for ftorafur and 5FU was developed and should be useful to further study drug interactions and establish dosing guidelines."( Modelling of ftorafur and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics following oral UFT administration. A population study in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer.
Bonneterre, J; Campone, M; Deporte-Fety, R; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P; Urien, S, 2003
)
" No pharmacokinetic interaction between CCI-779 and 5-FU was observed."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779, a novel cytostatic cell-cycle inhibitor, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Boni, J; Bruntsch, U; Peters, M; Punt, CJ; Thielert, C, 2003
)
"Drugs pharmacokinetic control is a usual practice in case of flat continuous infusions."( [Modeling 5-FU clearance during a chronomodulated infusion].
Chevalier, V; Chevrier, R; Chollet, P; Cure, H; Kwiatkowski, F; Richard, D, 2003
)
" However, only a few pharmacokinetic data of 5-FU during chronomodulated infusion are available but up to now not for oxaliplatin."( Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin during chronomodulated infusion in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients: a pilot investigation with preliminary results.
Höffken, K; Hoffmann, A; Merkel, U; Roskos, M; Wedding, U, 2003
)
" Pharmacokinetic and neurotoxicity assessments were performed at the cohort 2 MTD."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with solid tumors.
Adjei, AA; Ames, MM; Atherton, P; Erlichman, C; Galanis, E; Goetz, MP; Goldberg, RM; Pitot, H; Reid, JM; Rubin, J; Sloan, JA; Windebank, AJ, 2003
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed an AUC value of 85."( Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.
Ehrsson, H; Fester, C; Guthoff, I; Kornmann, M; Lotspeich, E; Schatz, M; Wallin, I,
)
" He was treated with pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC) and low-dose CPT-11."( [A case of highly advanced ascending colon cancer with multiple bone and liver metastases and pleuritis carcinomatosa treated with pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy and low-dose CPT-11].
Aihara, T; Fukuhara, A; Kouno, T; Murayama, M; Nakagawa, K; Nakamura, E; Niida, M; Nishimoto, Y; Nozaki, H; Syouda, S; Watanabe, Y; Yagyu, T; Yasuoka, H, 2004
)
" Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on cycle 1 and 2 to assess the best sequence and detect any interaction between the two drugs."( Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and FU-FOL combination and pharmacokinetic analysis in advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Adam, R; Bastian, G; Bismuth, H; Castaing, D; Gil-Delgado, MA; Guinet, F; Khayat, D; Rocher, MA; Spano, JP; Taillibert, S; Urien, S, 2004
)
" Blood samples for the pharmacokinetic study were obtained after the initial dose on day 1 of the first course."( Comparison of the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of a uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) regimen between Japanese and American patients with advanced colorectal cancer: joint United States and Japan study of UFT/LV.
Abbruzzese, JL; Boku, N; Hoff, PM; Hyodo, I; Loehrer, PJ; Muro, K; Nagashima, F; O'Dwyer, PJ; Ohtsu, A; Shirao, K; Wadleigh, RG; Wadler, S; Yamada, Y, 2004
)
"The efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters of UFT and LV are comparable in Japanese and American patients; however, a difference in toxicity profile, specifically diarrhea, was noted."( Comparison of the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of a uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) regimen between Japanese and American patients with advanced colorectal cancer: joint United States and Japan study of UFT/LV.
Abbruzzese, JL; Boku, N; Hoff, PM; Hyodo, I; Loehrer, PJ; Muro, K; Nagashima, F; O'Dwyer, PJ; Ohtsu, A; Shirao, K; Wadleigh, RG; Wadler, S; Yamada, Y, 2004
)
" We assessed the feasibility and pharmacokinetic interactions of combining MMI270 with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA)."( A dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MMI270 (previously termed CGS27023A) with 5-FU and folinic acid.
Blackey, R; Cassidy, J; Choi, L; Devlin, M; Eatock, M; Johnson, J; Morrison, R; Owen, S; Twelves, C, 2005
)
" Pharmacokinetic analyses for both BAY 12-9566 and 5-fluorouracil were performed."( An NCIC CTG phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase and angiogenesis inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Agarwal, V; Chouinard, E; Goel, R; Hirte, H; Huan, S; Humphrey, R; Lathia, C; Matthews, S; Roach, J; Seymour, L; Stafford, S; Stewart, DJ; Walsh, W; Waterfield, B, 2005
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis suggested there was no interaction between BAY 12-9566 and 5-fluorouracil."( An NCIC CTG phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase and angiogenesis inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Agarwal, V; Chouinard, E; Goel, R; Hirte, H; Huan, S; Humphrey, R; Lathia, C; Matthews, S; Roach, J; Seymour, L; Stafford, S; Stewart, DJ; Walsh, W; Waterfield, B, 2005
)
" Although there is some evidence of a clinical interaction, there is no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction."( An NCIC CTG phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase and angiogenesis inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Agarwal, V; Chouinard, E; Goel, R; Hirte, H; Huan, S; Humphrey, R; Lathia, C; Matthews, S; Roach, J; Seymour, L; Stafford, S; Stewart, DJ; Walsh, W; Waterfield, B, 2005
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the addition of 90 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin to LV5FU2 significantly reduced the 5FU area under the curve."( Intensified bimonthly cisplatin with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (LV5FU2) in Patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas: a phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study.
Alamanos, Y; Bamias, A; Christodoulou, C; Fountzilas, G; Karavasilis, V; Pavlidis, N; Soulti, K; Syrigos, K; Tzamakou, E, 2004
)
" These results indicate that bevacizumab can be safely administered in combination with the Saltz regimen without pharmacokinetic interaction."( Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bricarello, A; Christian, BJ; Gaudreault, J; Mounho, B; Shiu, V; Zuch, CL,
)
"We developed a method to assess the similarity of pharmacokinetic data between ethnically different populations."( Overlap coefficient for assessing the similarity of pharmacokinetic data between ethnically different populations.
Fukushima, A; Matsuyama, Y; Mizuno, S; Ohashi, Y; Yamaguchi, T, 2005
)
" For irinotecan, SN-38, APC and NPC, similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed from plasma and saliva data."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and its metabolites from plasma and saliva data in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving Folfiri regimen.
Abderrahim, AG; Astre, C; Bressolle, F; Duffour, J; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2006
)
"8 ng/ml, indicating large inter-patient pharmacokinetic variations."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with leucovorin in Korean patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Cho, HK; Chung, SJ; Kang, JH; Kim, DD; Kuh, HJ; Lee, ES; Lee, JW; Lee, KS; Park, JK; Shim, CK, 2006
)
" Antitumor efficacy in Korean advanced colorectal cancer patients given oxaliplatin and 5-FU should be further evaluated with respect to pharmacokinetic variabilities."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with leucovorin in Korean patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Cho, HK; Chung, SJ; Kang, JH; Kim, DD; Kuh, HJ; Lee, ES; Lee, JW; Lee, KS; Park, JK; Shim, CK, 2006
)
" Pharmacokinetic parameters showed moderate interpatient variability."( Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and non-hematological toxicity in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with chronomodulated oxaliplatin, 5-FU and sodium folinate in a pilot investigation.
Farker, K; Hippius, M; Höffken, K; Hoffmann, A; Merkel, U; Roskos, M; Wedding, U, 2006
)
" This PK model could be useful in identifying predictors for PK and pharmacodynamic variability to individualize dosing."( Population pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Brouwers, JR; Jansman, FG; Kho, Y; Neef, C; Prins, NH, 2006
)
"To develop and a priori validate a methotrexate population pharmacokinetic model in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), receiving high-dose methotrexate followed by folinic acid rescue, identifying the covariates that could explain part of the pharmacokinetic variability of methotrexate."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Aumente, D; Buelga, DS; García, MJ; Gomez, P; Lukas, JC; Torres, A, 2006
)
" In an index group (37 individuals; 1236 methotrexate plasma concentrations), a population pharmacokinetic model was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Aumente, D; Buelga, DS; García, MJ; Gomez, P; Lukas, JC; Torres, A, 2006
)
"The final population pharmacokinetic model (two-compartmental) included only age and total bodyweight as influencing clearance (CL) and volume of distribution of central compartment (V(1))."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Aumente, D; Buelga, DS; García, MJ; Gomez, P; Lukas, JC; Torres, A, 2006
)
"A methotrexate population pharmacokinetic model has been developed for ALL children."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Aumente, D; Buelga, DS; García, MJ; Gomez, P; Lukas, JC; Torres, A, 2006
)
" Intraperitoneal FU exposure (AUC) after IP treatment was >1000-fold plasma AUC after IP treatment (regional pharmacokinetic advantage), and >100-fold plasma AUC after intravenous treatment (regional therapeutic advantage)."( A feasibility, pharmacokinetic and frequency-escalation trial of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high risk gastrointestinal tract cancer.
Brown, CB; Chester, JD; Dunham, R; Farrugia, D; Finan, PJ; Halstead, F; Joel, SP; King, J; Seymour, MT; Slevin, ML; Trigonis, I; Wilson, G, 2008
)
" Part 1 was designed to determine the OTR and part 2 was the pharmacokinetic part of the study."( Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the safety and tolerability of lapatinib (GW572016) in combination with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in patients with solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Boot, H; Keessen, M; Koch, KM; Pandite, L; Richel, DJ; Schellens, JH; Siegel-Lakhai, WS; Smith, DA; Versola, M; Vervenne, WL, 2007
)
" Co-administration of lapatinib increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, by an average of 41%; no other pharmacokinetic interactions were observed."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lapatinib in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan.
Flaherty, KT; Fleming, RA; Kerr, DJ; Koch, KM; Middleton, MR; Midgley, RS; O'Dwyer, PJ; Pratap, SE; Smith, DA; Stevenson, JP; Versola, M; Ward, C, 2007
)
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed after logarithmic transformation according to a general linear model."( A clinical pharmacokinetic analysis of tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin given in a new twice-daily oral administration schedule.
Bennouna, J; Cardot, JM; Château, Y; Douillard, JY; Etienne-Grimaldi, MC; François, E; Gamelin, E; Milano, G; Renée, N, 2007
)
" Three sequential skin biopsies were obtained in selected patients to assess the pharmacodynamic effects on EGFR signaling of FOLFIRI alone and with EKB-569."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
" Chemotherapy alone interferes with pharmacodynamic markers, an observation to be taken into account in future studies of targeted agents with chemotherapy."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
"To test the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy combined with cisplatin (PMC-cisplatin) as induction chemotherapy (ICT) before definitive treatment in patients with respectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)."( Effectiveness of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy combined with cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer: phase II study.
Chang, PM; Chang, SY; Chen, PM; Chu, PY; Huang, JL; Tai, SK; Tsai, TL; Wang, LW; Wang, YF; Yang, MH, 2008
)
"Individual FU dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic monitoring resulted in significantly improved objective response rate, a trend to higher survival rate, and fewer grade 3/4 toxicities."( Individual fluorouracil dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic follow-up compared with conventional dosage: results of a multicenter randomized trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Delva, R; Dorval, E; Gamelin, E; Jacob, J; Merrouche, Y; Morel, A; Pezet, D; Piot, G; Raoul, JL, 2008
)
"To evaluate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) pharmacokinetics and disease-free survival (DFS) in colorectal cancer patients given 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy within a nonrandomized, retrospective, pharmacokinetic study."( 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics predicts disease-free survival in patients administered adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Donato, S; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Federici, F; Iannopollo, M; Lastella, M; Lencioni, M; Orlandini, C; Ricci, S, 2008
)
" Individual plasma concentrations of 5-FU and 5-FDHU were determined on day 1 of the first cycle with a validated high performance liquid chromatography method, and the main pharmacokinetic variables were determined."( 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics predicts disease-free survival in patients administered adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Donato, S; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Federici, F; Iannopollo, M; Lastella, M; Lencioni, M; Orlandini, C; Ricci, S, 2008
)
" Because the replacement of 2-day-infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) of FOLFIRI with oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin (UFT/LV) would be highly beneficial for clinical management, we performed a phase I trial using oral UFT/LV and a pharmacokinetic evaluation."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tegafur-uracil/leucovorin combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Azuma, T; Chayahara, N; Hirai, M; Inoue, Y; Kadowaki, Y; Kasuga, M; Maeda, T; Miki, I; Nishisaki, H; Okumura, K; Okuno, T; Sakaeda, T; Tamura, T; Tsuda, M; Yamamori, M, 2009
)
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation suggested continuous exposure to 5-FU by means of oral UFT/LV administration in this combination."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tegafur-uracil/leucovorin combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Azuma, T; Chayahara, N; Hirai, M; Inoue, Y; Kadowaki, Y; Kasuga, M; Maeda, T; Miki, I; Nishisaki, H; Okumura, K; Okuno, T; Sakaeda, T; Tamura, T; Tsuda, M; Yamamori, M, 2009
)
" There were no significant differences in the main pharmacokinetic parameters between the two arms except a lower area under the plasma concentration-time curve and a smaller apparent steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) when GSH was coadministered."( Administration of reduced glutathione in FOLFOX4 adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer: effect on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics, Pt-DNA adduct formation, and neurotoxicity.
Airoldi, M; Cattel, L; Drescher, A; Jaehde, U; Milla, P; Weber, G, 2009
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on blood, plasma and plasma ultrafiltrable by ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry)."( Clinical and pharmacokinetics study of oxaliplatin in colon cancer patients.
Balacescu, L; Balacescu, O; Berindan-Neagoe, IB; Burz, C; Chintoanu, M; Cristea, V; Gog, A; Irimie, A; Leucuta, SE; Tanaselia, C; Ursu, M; Vlase, L, 2009
)
" The mean Cmax and AUC 0-24 of oxaliplatin increased in a dose-related manner."( Clinical and pharmacokinetics study of oxaliplatin in colon cancer patients.
Balacescu, L; Balacescu, O; Berindan-Neagoe, IB; Burz, C; Chintoanu, M; Cristea, V; Gog, A; Irimie, A; Leucuta, SE; Tanaselia, C; Ursu, M; Vlase, L, 2009
)
" With a relatively low interpatient variability, it is eliminated triphasically and the mean Cmax and AUC 0-24 increases in a dose-related manner."( Clinical and pharmacokinetics study of oxaliplatin in colon cancer patients.
Balacescu, L; Balacescu, O; Berindan-Neagoe, IB; Burz, C; Chintoanu, M; Cristea, V; Gog, A; Irimie, A; Leucuta, SE; Tanaselia, C; Ursu, M; Vlase, L, 2009
)
" The median C(max) of FU at each dose level increased significantly with increasing doses of vorinostat, suggesting a pharmacokinetic interaction between FU and vorinostat."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.
Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Pendyala, L; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Toth, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
"This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of cetuximab administered on an every-second-week schedule to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, on the basis of safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation."( Cetuximab administered once every second week to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a two-part pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase I dose-escalation study.
Baselga, J; Cervantes, A; Ciardiello, F; Kisker, O; Liebscher, S; Macarulla, T; Martinelli, E; Ramos, FJ; Rivera, F; Rodriguez-Braun, E; Roselló, S; Tabernero, J; Vega-Villegas, ME, 2010
)
" No pharmacokinetic interactions were noted between vorinostat and FU."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of two schedules of vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Diasio, RB; Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Muindi, JR; Wang, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2010
)
" 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be used in vivo to measure 5FU's half-life and metabolism to cytotoxic fluoronucleotides."( Can localised (19)F magnetic resonance spectroscopy pharmacokinetics of 5FU in colorectal metastases predict clinical response?
Griffiths, JR; Howe, FA; Ladroue, C; Lofts, F; McIntyre, DJ; Stubbs, M, 2011
)
" The 5FU half-life was measured in each subject, and averaged spectra were examined for the presence of fluoronucleotides."( Can localised (19)F magnetic resonance spectroscopy pharmacokinetics of 5FU in colorectal metastases predict clinical response?
Griffiths, JR; Howe, FA; Ladroue, C; Lofts, F; McIntyre, DJ; Stubbs, M, 2011
)
" The study also determined the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU, especially steady-state plasma and bone marrow (BM) concentrations."( Phase I, pharmacokinetic, and bone marrow drug-level studies of tri-monthly 48-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers.
Chen, RR; Cheng, AL; Ho, YF; Lu, WC; Yeh, KH, 2011
)
" We conducted a phase II trial to confirm the pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as surrogate biomarkers of BV + FOLFIRI regimen efficacy in colorectal cancer with liver metastases."( Pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla DCE-MRI as surrogate biomarkers of antitumor effects of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis.
Akiyoshi, K; Hamaguchi, T; Hirashima, Y; Horita, Y; Kato, K; Miyake, M; Nakajima, T; Okita, N; Shimada, Y; Shirao, K; Takahari, D; Takashima, A; Tateishi, U; Yamada, Y, 2012
)
", Salt Lake City, UT) that measures plasma 5-FU concentration and reports an AUC in mg · h/L has been developed to optimize therapy using pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing."( Modeling the 5-fluorouracil area under the curve versus dose relationship to develop a pharmacokinetic dosing algorithm for colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFOX6.
Grier, CE; Hamilton, SA; Haregewoin, A; Kaldate, RR; McLeod, HL, 2012
)
"The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic profile of liver-directed therapy with drug-eluting beads irinotecan (DEBIRI) in combination with systemic modified FOLFOX in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan drug-eluting beads in the treatment of chemo-naive unresectable colorectal liver metastasis with concomitant systemic fluorouracil and oxaliplatin: results of pharmacokinetics and phase I trial.
Martin, RC; Metzger, T; Schreeder, M; Scoggins, CR; Sharma, V; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2012
)
" Pharmacokinetic data has demonstrated minimal detectable levels of irinotecan (18."( Irinotecan drug-eluting beads in the treatment of chemo-naive unresectable colorectal liver metastasis with concomitant systemic fluorouracil and oxaliplatin: results of pharmacokinetics and phase I trial.
Martin, RC; Metzger, T; Schreeder, M; Scoggins, CR; Sharma, V; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2012
)
" Alternatively, 5-FU doses can be adjusted based on 5-FU pharmacokinetic (PK) monitoring."( Personalized dosing via pharmacokinetic monitoring of 5-fluorouracil might reduce toxicity in early- or late-stage colorectal cancer patients treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens.
Beachler, C; El-Deiry, WS; Harvey, HA; Kline, CL; Mackley, HB; McKenna, K; Messaris, E; Poritz, L; Schiccitano, A; Sheikh, H; Sivik, J; Staveley-O'Carroll, K; Stewart, D; Zhu, J, 2014
)
"The aim of this study was the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, clinical outcome, and imaging parameters in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFIRI plus sunitinib."( FOLFIRI and sunitinib as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases--a CESAR phase II study including pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and imaging data.
Büchert, M; Burkholder, I; Jaehde, U; Kanefendt, F; Kuhlmann, J; Moritz, B; Mross, K; Scheulen, M; Sörgel, F; Strumberg, D, 2014
)
" Pharmacokinetic parameters, including C max, AUC0-t, t 1/2, V d, and CL, were calculated using non-compartmental models."( Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of disodium folinate following single intravenous doses in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label, randomized, single-center study.
Li, Y; Li, Z; Liu, Y; Shi, S; Wu, J; Yang, C; Zhang, Y; Zhou, J, 2015
)
" Plasma was collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis before, during, and after surgery."( A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of Modufolin® compared to Isovorin® after single dose intravenous administration to patients with colon cancer: a randomized study.
Derwinger, K; Kodeda, K; Odin, E; Taflin, H; Wettergren, Y, 2015
)
" Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by the NLME software."( [SLCO1B1c. 521T>C gene polymorphisms are associated with high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Chen, Y; Gao, P; He, X; Li, J; Niu, C; Wang, C; Wang, Y; Zhang, H, 2014
)
" Many authors have described the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of MTX regarding osteosarcoma under a variety of circumstances."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate after intravenous administration in Chinese osteosarcoma patients from a single institution.
Lu, W; Niu, X; Tian, X; Zhang, Q; Zhang, W; Zhao, H; Zhen, J, 2015
)
"This phase Ib study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of ramucirumab, a recombinant human IgG1 neutralizing monoclonal antibody specific for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, in combination with irinotecan, levofolinate and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC)."( Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Second-line Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.
Gao, L; Gotoh, M; Nasroulah, F; Ohtsu, A; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Yoshizuka, N, 2015
)
"The effect of individual dose adjustment of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based on pharmacokinetic monitoring on the outcome of FOLFOX for metastatic colorectal cancer was analyzed retrospectively."( [Individual Dose Adjustment of 5-Fluorouracil Based on Pharmacokinetic Monitoring May Improve the Outcome of FOLFOX for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].
Kanda, J; Muneoka, K; Sakata, J; Sasaki, M; Shirai, Y; Wakabayashi, H; Wakai, T, 2016
)
" The sample group included 11 patients in whom 5-FU doses were adjusted individually based on pharmacokinetic monitoring according to an algorithm to maintain the area under the curve (AUC) in the range of 20-25 mg·h/L (Group A) and 9 patients in whom 5-FU doses were adjusted conventionally based on body surface area (Group B)."( [Individual Dose Adjustment of 5-Fluorouracil Based on Pharmacokinetic Monitoring May Improve the Outcome of FOLFOX for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].
Kanda, J; Muneoka, K; Sakata, J; Sasaki, M; Shirai, Y; Wakabayashi, H; Wakai, T, 2016
)
"The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the potential of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38, when administered with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI)."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
" Study description, pharmacokinetic parameter values and influential covariates are reported."( Population pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRINOX: a review of studies and parameters.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Gattacceca, F, 2019
)
" The individualized dosing of CPT-11 is essential to ensure optimal pharmacotherapy in cancer patients, given the wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of this drug and its active metabolite SN-38."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
" Supported by several demographic data, blood markers and pharmacokinetic parameters resulting from a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic study of CPT-11 and its metabolites (SN-38 and SN-38-G), we use machine learning techniques to predict high degrees of different toxicities (leukopenia, neutropenia and diarrhea) in new patients."( Prediction of irinotecan toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning models with pharmacokinetic parameters.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
" The elimination half-life slowly improved over the following cycles suggesting a reversible cause responsible for reduced MTX clearance and toxicity during the first cycle."( Reversible Impaired Methotrexate Clearance After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Osteosarcoma.
de Haan, J; Oude Munnink, T; Touw, D; van der Meer, A; van Kruchten, M, 2019
)
" A population pharmacokinetic approach was used to determine oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics with and without ibudilast."( Ibudilast for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: a pilot study assessing preliminary efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.
Blinman, PL; Dhillon, HM; Galettis, P; McLachlan, AJ; Proschogo, N; Reuter, SE; Teng, C; Vardy, JL, 2020
)
" Pharmacokinetic analysis indicates ibudilast has no significant effect on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics, and is unlikely to influence pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil."( Ibudilast for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: a pilot study assessing preliminary efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.
Blinman, PL; Dhillon, HM; Galettis, P; McLachlan, AJ; Proschogo, N; Reuter, SE; Teng, C; Vardy, JL, 2020
)
" Using pharmacokinetic analysis, it is possible to directly evaluate enzyme activity and consider what kind of enzyme variation causes the increase in the AUC of SN-38."( Effect of UGT1A1, CYP3A and CES Activities on the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and its Metabolites in Patients with UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms.
Ayukawa, H; Endo, S; Furuse, J; Furuta, T; Hirano, R; Kaneko, S; Kawai, K; Kobayashi, T; Minowa, Y; Nagashima, F; Naruge, D; Okano, N; Shibasaki, H; Yokokawa, A, 2021
)
"The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its four main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, APC and NPC) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX regimens and to quantify and explain the inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability in this context."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
" First, fixed and random effects models were selected using statistical and graphical methods; second, the impact of covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters was evaluated to explain the inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
" Moreover, a direct conversion of NPC into SN-38 had never been described before in a population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
" However, systematic evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic interactions among multi-drug therapy has not been reported previously."( FOLFIRINOX Pharmacodynamic Interactions in 2D and 3D Pancreatic Cancer Cell Cultures.
Allen-Coyle, TJ; Clynes, M; Conlon, NT; Garner, W; Mager, DE; Niu, J; O'Sullivan, F; Roche, S; Straubinger, RM; Welsch, E, 2022
)

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReference
"This paper presents an overview of studies of therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in which chemotherapy was combined with other modalities."( Current concepts of chemotherapy combined with other modalities for head and neck cancer.
DeWys, WD, 1975
)
"38 patients with advanced breast adenocarcinoma were treated in a phase II study with 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid combined with cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone."( A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid in combination with cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone for advanced breast cancer.
Aitini, E; Cantore, M; Cavazzini, G; Di Marco, A; Rabbi, C; Rivera, A; Smerieri, F; Togliani, B, 1992
)
"In a prospective randomized multicentre trial 139 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (70 men, 69 women; age 35-81 years) were given palliative treatment with fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) alone or combined with folic acid (100 mg/m2 before each dose of fluorouracil)."( [Fluorouracil as monotherapy or combined with folinic acid in the treatment of metastasizing colorectal carcinoma].
Aulbert, E; Burghardt, F; Hausamen, TU; Korsten, FW; Lindemann, W; Löffler, TM; Planker, M; Reis, HE; Schröder, M; Strohmeyer, G, 1992
)
"The possibility of a deleterious effect of the unnatural stereoisomer on the modulation of 5-FU led us to carry out a phase I-II study of 5-FU combined with the (6S)-stereoisomer of folinic acid given in high doses for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma."( Fluorouracil combined with the pure (6S)-stereoisomer of folinic acid in high doses for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I-II study.
Goldschmidt, E; Grison, X; Guillot, T; Hannoun, L; Lotz, JP; Machover, D; Marquet, J; Metzger, G; Richaud, J; Zittoun, J, 1992
)
" These findings suggested that arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with biochemical modulation was a safe and effective method for treating cancer patients."( [Arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with biochemical modulation in cancer patients].
Mai, M; Ogino, T; Suga, T; Takahashi, Y, 1991
)
"Clinically, 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (leucovorin, folinic acid, LV) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used at various doses, schedules, and routes of administration with therapeutic benefit to patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and breast carcinoma."( Toxicity and antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin. Role of dose schedule and route of administration of leucovorin.
Rustum, YM, 1989
)
" In this study leucovorin (folinic acid, LCV) was added to the MTX/FUra combination with the intention of generating elevated levels of methylenetetrahydrofolate to promote the formation of a stable fluorodeoxyuridylate-thymidylate synthetase ternary complex, thereby augmenting the cytotoxicity of the MTX-FUra sequence."( Lack of enhanced cytotoxicity of cultured L1210 cells using folinic acid in combination with sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil.
Cadman, E; Danhauser, LL; Heimer, R, 1985
)
" Of the 66 patients with colorectal carcinoma, 44 had not been previously treated with cytostatics and 22 were resistant to previous chemotherapy with 5-FU given either as a single agent or combined with other drugs."( Treatment of advanced colorectal and gastric adenocarcinomas with 5-fluorouracil combined with high-dose folinic acid. An update.
Chollet, P; Goldschmidt, E; Machover, D; Mathé, G; Misset, JL; Schwarzenberg, L; Vanden-Bulcke, JM, 1985
)
" This study assesses prospectively the results of liver resection as compared to liver resection combined with pre- and post-operative locoregional chemotherapy-immunotherapy in 40 patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma."( Hepatocellular carcinoma: surgical resection versus surgical resection combined with pre- and post-operative locoregional immunotherapy-chemotherapy. A prospective randomized study.
Konstantinidou, AE; Lygidakis, NJ; Pothoulakis, J; Spanos, H,
)
" The combination with folinic acid as a biomodulatory substance and other cytotoxic drugs has been introduced to render protocols more effective and less toxic."( Severe cardiotoxicity of high-dose 5-fluorouracil in combination with folinic acid, cisplatin and methotrexate in a 14-year-old boy with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Schmincke tumor).
Blütters-Sawatzki, R; Grathwohl, J; Lampert, F; Mertens, R,
)
" Drugs were administered with a programmable-in-time pump by continuous infusion for 5 days."( Spontaneous or imposed circadian changes in plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil coadministered with folinic acid and oxaliplatin: relationship with mucosal toxicity in patients with cancer.
Bastian, G; Brienza, S; Comisso, M; Etienne, MC; Lévi, F; Massari, C; Metzger, G; Milano, G; Misset, JL; Touitou, Y, 1994
)
"To determine the toxicities and potential for dose escalation of intravenous (IV) bolus fluorouracil (5-FU) given with 500 mg/m2/d leucovorin (LCV) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given in combination with fluorouracil plus calcium leucovorin in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.
Arbuck, SG; Balis, F; Chen, A; Grem, JL; Hamilton, JM; Jordan, E; McAtee, N; Murphy, RF; Setser, A; Steinberg, S, 1994
)
"A starting dose of 425 mg/m2/d of 5-FU with LCV on days 1 to 5 could be safely combined with GM-CSF starting either on day 1 or day 6, with further 5-FU dose escalation according to individual tolerance."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given in combination with fluorouracil plus calcium leucovorin in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.
Arbuck, SG; Balis, F; Chen, A; Grem, JL; Hamilton, JM; Jordan, E; McAtee, N; Murphy, RF; Setser, A; Steinberg, S, 1994
)
"This study was conducted to investigate the activity and toxicity of 5fluorouracil folinic acid+mitomycin C combined with alpha 2b interferon in advanced colorectal cancer based upon recent studies suggesting a possible biochemical modulation of 5fluorouracil by interferon."( Mitomycin C, 5fluorouracil and folinic acid in combination with alpha 2b interferon for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bascioni, R; Battelli, N; Battelli, T; Delprete, S; Manocchi, P; Mattioli, R; Mazzanti, P; Pilone, A; Rossini, S; Silva, RR, 1993
)
"Between June 1990 and April 1991 25 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were treated with mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 iv bolus on day 1, 5fluorouracil 375 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and folinic acid 200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 every 4 weeks, combined with alpha 2b interferon 3 million U day continuously."( Mitomycin C, 5fluorouracil and folinic acid in combination with alpha 2b interferon for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bascioni, R; Battelli, N; Battelli, T; Delprete, S; Manocchi, P; Mattioli, R; Mazzanti, P; Pilone, A; Rossini, S; Silva, RR, 1993
)
" The possibility of a deleterious effect of the unnatural stereoisomer on the modulation of 5-FU led us to carry out 2 consecutive phase I-II studies of 5-FU combined with the [6S]-stereoisomer of folinic acid given in high doses for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma."( 5-Fluorouracil combined with the [6S]-stereoisomer of folinic acid in high doses for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase I-II study of two consecutive regimens.
André, T; Goldschmidt, E; Grison, X; Hannoun, L; Lotz, JP; Machover, D; Marquet, J; Metzger, G; Richaud, J; Zittoun, J, 1993
)
"5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), when combined with leucovorin (LV) or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), may result in improved response rates compared with 5-FU alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Continuous infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin and recombinant interferon-alpha-2b in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A Multicenter Phase II study.
Burghouts, JT; Croles, JJ; de Mulder, PH; Kamm, Y; Punt, CJ; van Liessum, PA, 1993
)
"The efficacy of 5-FU continuous infusion combined with LV and IFN-alpha does not appear to differ significantly from earlier reports on treatment using 5-FU plus LV or 5-FU plus IFN-alpha for patients with colorectal cancer."( Continuous infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin and recombinant interferon-alpha-2b in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A Multicenter Phase II study.
Burghouts, JT; Croles, JJ; de Mulder, PH; Kamm, Y; Punt, CJ; van Liessum, PA, 1993
)
"To determine the most effective dose of leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) within a weekly bolus fluorouracil (FU) schedule, we conducted a randomized multicenter trial to compare therapeutic effects and toxicity of high-dose FA versus low-dose FA combined with FU at equal doses in both treatment groups."( Weekly high-dose leucovorin versus low-dose leucovorin combined with fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Study Group for Palliative Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Study Protocol 1.
Bernhard, G; Bernhard, H; Heike, M; Jäger, E; Klein, O; Knuth, A; Lautz, D; Meyer zum Büschenfelde, KH; Michaelis, J, 1996
)
"Patients with measurable inoperable or metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive weekly FU 500 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus combined with high-dose FA 500 mg/m2 (group A) or low-dose FA 20 mg/m2 (group B) by 2-hour infusion."( Weekly high-dose leucovorin versus low-dose leucovorin combined with fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Study Group for Palliative Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Study Protocol 1.
Bernhard, G; Bernhard, H; Heike, M; Jäger, E; Klein, O; Knuth, A; Lautz, D; Meyer zum Büschenfelde, KH; Michaelis, J, 1996
)
" Therefore, low-dose FA combined with weekly FU may be considered the preferred treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Weekly high-dose leucovorin versus low-dose leucovorin combined with fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Study Group for Palliative Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Study Protocol 1.
Bernhard, G; Bernhard, H; Heike, M; Jäger, E; Klein, O; Knuth, A; Lautz, D; Meyer zum Büschenfelde, KH; Michaelis, J, 1996
)
"The combination of sequential high dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (FU) combined with epirubicin (FEMTX regimen) has shown some clinical efficiency as a first line therapy in advanced gastric cancer."( Ineffectiveness of sequential high dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil combined with epirubicin (FEMTX regimen) as a salvage therapy in advanced colorectal cancers and other gastrointestinal tumors.
Adenis, A; Bonneterre, J; Leriche, N; Pion, JM; Vanlemmens, L,
)
" This observation prompted a Phase I clinical study of lometrexol given with folic acid supplementation which has confirmed that the toxicity of lometrexol can be markedly reduced by folic acid supplementation."( A phase I clinical study of the antipurine antifolate lometrexol (DDATHF) given with oral folic acid.
Bailey, N; Boddy, AV; Calvert, AH; Chapman, F; Gumbrell, L; Humphreys, A; Laohavinij, S; Lind, MJ; Newell, DR; Oakley, A; Proctor, M; Robson, L; Simmons, D; Taylor, GA; Thomas, HD; Wedge, SR, 1996
)
"To compare the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FU) and racemic leucovorin (d,l-LV) versus FU combined with the l-isomer of leucovorin (l-LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer."( Fluorouracil plus racemic leucovorin versus fluorouracil combined with the pure l-isomer of leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.
Burger, D; Depisch, D; Greiner, R; Karner, J; Kornek, G; Kovats, E; Marczell, A; Pidlich, J; Raderer, M; Rosen, H; Salem, G; Scheithauer, W; Schneeweiss, B, 1997
)
"These studies demonstrate that the present dose and schedule of AZT in combination with 5-FU + LV has significant activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and that the combination of 5-FU + LV with AZT increases the amount of DNA damage."( Maximum tolerable doses of intravenous zidovudine in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clinical evidence of significant antitumor activity and enhancement of zidovudine-induced DNA single strand break
Allegrini, G; Andreuccetti, M; Antonuzzo, A; Brunetti, I; Conte, PF; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Falcone, A; Lencioni, M; Malvaldi, G; Pfanner, E, 1997
)
" Its combination with other effective and well-tolerated cytotoxics may thus be beneficial."( Phase I-II study of vinorelbine in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a regimen with a low subjective toxic burden.
Aapro, M; Andreoni, G; de Braud, F; De Pas, TM; Goldhirsch, A; Minchella, I; Monti, S; Nolè, F; Zampino, MG, 1997
)
"There was no difference in response, survival, or toxicity between these three different leucovorin formulations combined with 5-FU."( Prospectively randomized North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of intensive-course fluorouracil combined with the l-isomer of intravenous leucovorin, oral leucovorin, or intravenous leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Goldberg, RM; Hatfield, AK; Kahn, M; Knost, JA; Krook, JE; Maillard, JA; Moertel, CG; O'Connell, MJ; Sargent, DJ; Schaefer, PL; Tirona, MT; Wiesenfeld, M, 1997
)
" Gastrimmune immunisation may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of colorectal cancer in combination with 5-FU/leucovorin."( Pre-clinical evaluation of the Gastrimmune immunogen alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in a rat colorectal cancer model.
Clarke, PA; Grimes, S; Hardcastle, JD; Justin, TA; Michael, D; Morris, TM; Robinson, G; Watson, SA, 1998
)
"To evaluate the antitumor activity in terms of response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and survival of paclitaxel in combination with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC)."( Paclitaxel in combination with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase II study.
Achterrath, W; Eberhardt, W; Harstrick, A; Klaassen, U; Lenaz, L; Neumann, K; Philippou Pari, C; Seeber, S; Strumberg, D; Wilke, H, 1998
)
"Paclitaxel combined with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-FU/leucovorin is well tolerated in the second line treatment of MBC."( Paclitaxel in combination with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase II study.
Achterrath, W; Eberhardt, W; Harstrick, A; Klaassen, U; Lenaz, L; Neumann, K; Philippou Pari, C; Seeber, S; Strumberg, D; Wilke, H, 1998
)
" Taken together, the results clearly demonstrated the ability of IL-15, but not IL-2, to provide significant improvement of the therapeutic index of FUra alone and in combination with LV."( Interleukin 15 protects against toxicity and potentiates antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil alone and in combination with leucovorin in rats bearing colorectal cancer.
Cao, S; Rustum, YM; Troutt, AB, 1998
)
" This prospective randomized trial compares low-dose (group 1) and high-dose (group 2) leucovorin, combined with the same dose of 5-FU to determine whether high-dose leucovorin was more beneficial than low-dose on overall survival."( A prospective randomized study comparing high- and low-dose leucovorin combined with same-dose 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer.
Blanc, F; Bons-Rosset, F; Fabbro-Peray, P; Gouze, C; Heran, B; Marçais, O; Perney, P; Ribard, D; Veyrac, M; Ychou, M, 1998
)
" Preclinical studies indicated an enhancement of the therapeutic index when capecitabine was combined with leucovorin."( A Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with oral leucovorin in patients with intractable solid tumors.
Allman, D; Bissett, D; Cassidy, J; Dirix, L; Griffin, T; Osterwalder, B; Reigner, B; Van Oosterom, AT, 1998
)
" We then tested the effect of GM-CSF given with a more toxic regimen of 5-FU/LV/IFN-alpha (IFN alpha-2a)."( A pilot study of interferon alpha-2a, fluorouracil, and leucovorin given with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.
Allegra, C; Behan, K; Chen, A; Flemming, D; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Haller, D; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; Johnston, PG; Lash, A; Liewehr, D; Monahan, B; Morrison, G; Quinn, M; Shapiro, JD; Steinberg, SM; Takimoto, C; Vaughn, D, 1999
)
"To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Armand, JP; Bexon, A; Bonnay, M; Ducreux, M; Mahjoubi, M; Méry-Mignard, D; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF; Ychou, M, 1999
)
" CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies."( Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Armand, JP; Bexon, A; Bonnay, M; Ducreux, M; Mahjoubi, M; Méry-Mignard, D; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF; Ychou, M, 1999
)
"Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil and calcium folinate was well-tolerated and increased response rate, time to progression, and survival, with a later deterioration in quality of life."( Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
Alakl, M; Awad, L; Carmichael, J; Cunningham, D; Douillard, JY; Gruia, G; Iveson, T; James, RD; Jandik, P; Karasek, P; Navarro, M; Roth, AD; Rougier, P, 2000
)
"This study was performed to investigate the activity and safety of high dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given as a weekly 24-hour infusion in combination with folinic acid plus mitomycin C in patients with advanced gastric cancer."( Weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in combination with mitomycin C for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Benter, T; Dörken, B; Hohenberger, P; Köhne, CH; Kretzschmar, A; Reichardt, P; Thuss-Patience, PC, 2000
)
" This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly 5-FU when administered with GM-CSF and high-dose LV."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 5-fluorouracil administered with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and high-dose leucovorin: a potential role for growth factor as mucosal protectant.
Blumenson, LE; Creaven, PJ; Frank, C; Meropol, NJ; Rustum, YM, 1999
)
" We describe the design of a phase II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of UFT/leucovorin combined with mitomycin-C in a larger group of previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( UFT/leucovorin combined with mitomycin-C in metastatic colorectal Ca.
Jakobsen, A, 2000
)
" Protracted infusional 5-FU has been associated with decreased tumor recurrence and improved survival when combined with postoperative adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy."( Postoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer combined with UFT/leucovorin.
Haller, DG; Minsky, BD; Rosenthal, DI; Saltz, L; Semple, D, 2000
)
"The recommended oral dosage of 5-FU (10 mg/m(2) PO bid) given with eniluracil and leucovorin is approximately 115-fold lower than the reference dosage for 24-hour infusional 5-FU."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors.
Bi, DQ; Donavan, S; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; Keith, B; Monahan, BP; Morrison, G; Quinn, MG; Shapiro, J; Takimoto, CH; Zentko, S, 2000
)
" The present study was initiated to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 5-FU-FA."( A phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil (24-hour) and folinic acid in patients with chemonaive advanced pancreatic cancer.
Arning, M; Arnold, D; Herrenberger, J; Huhn, D; Kindler, M; Korsten, EW; Langrehr, J; Musch, R; Oettle, H; Pelzer, U; Reitzig, P; Riess, H; Stroszczynski, C, 2000
)
"rhuMAbVEGF can be safely combined with chemotherapy at doses associated with VEGF blockade and without apparent synergistic toxicity."( Phase Ib trial of intravenous recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: pharmacologic and long-term safety data.
Adelman, D; Breed, J; Fyfe, G; Gaudreault, J; Gordon, MS; Holmgren, E; Margolin, K; Novotny, W; Stalter, S, 2001
)
" A total of 533 courses were administered with a range of 1-14 in FOLFOX4 and 1-12 in FOLFOX2; dose intensity was 92."( The value of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion +/- bolus 5-fluorouracil and levo-folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after 5FU-based chemotherapy: a GISCAD (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract) cancer phas
Baldelli, AM; Beretta, GD; Cascinu, S; Catalano, V; Curti, C; Giordani, P; Labianca, R; Martignoni, G; Mosconi, S; Pancera, G; Poletti, P; Zaniboni, A,
)
"The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients."( A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Balbiani, L; Bella, S; Blajman, C; Cazap, E; Chacón, M; Cóppola, F; Giglio, R; Lastiri, F; Mickiewicz, E; Montiel, M; Perazzo, F; Pujol, F; Recondo, G; Richardet, E; Rodger, J; Schmilovich, A; Simon, J; Van Kooten, M; Vilanova, M; Wasserman, E; Zori Comba, A, 2001
)
"Patients with isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer were treated every three weeks with increasing doses of oxaliplatin (4 hours; starting dose 25 mg/m2, escalation in steps of 25 mg/m2) in combination with folinic acid (1 hour, 200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2 hour, 600 mg/m2)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Beckert, B; Beykirch, M; Braess, J; Goecke, E; Hiddemann, W; Kern, W; Lang, N; Schalhorn, A; Stein, J; Stemmler, J; Waggershauser, T, 2001
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with leucovorin (LV)-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; de Gramont schedule) every 2 weeks in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 2 weeks as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Agelaki, A; Androulakis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kouroussis, C; Malamos, N; Mavroudis, D; Samonis, G; Souglakos, J; Vardakis, N, 2001
)
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and tolerance of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with conventional doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes."( Salvage chemotherapy with high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with conventional doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclin
Agelaki, S; Christodoulakis, M; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kouroussis, C; Mavroudis, D; Souglakos, J; Stylianou, K; Vamvakas, L, 2001
)
"Unusual aspect of the development of oxaliplatin was that substantial evidence of its activity was gathered when used in combination with protracted infusion of 5FU combined with leucovorin, preceeding the formal demonstration of its single activity in this disease."( [Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluoro-uracil and folinic acid as treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer].
André, T; Gramont, AD; Louvet, C; Maindrault-Goebel, F, 2001
)
"Fifteen patients with isolated liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma were treated with regional administration of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA)."( Regional administration of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases--a pilot experience.
Dvorák, J; Jandík, P; Malírová, E; Megancová, J; Melichar, B; Tousková, M; Voboril, Z,
)
" A phase II study was conducted to assess the tolerance and efficacy of CPT-11 in combination with leucovorin-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-FU given according to the de Gramont regimen in chemonaive patients with ACC."( Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.
Androulakis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kandilis, K; Kouroussis, C; Mavroudis, D; Sarra, E; Souglakos, J; Vamvakas, L; Ziras, N, 2002
)
" A phase II study of sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil, combined with doxorubicin, as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy was conducted in an attempt to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in improving the survival of patients with scirrhous gastric cancer."( Phase II study of sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for scirrhous gastric cancer.
Boku, N; Inoue, K; Kinoshita, T; Konishi, M; Nakagouri, T; Ohtsu, A; Ono, M; Sugitou, M; Takahashi, S; Yoshida, S, 2001
)
", Carlsbad, CA) when administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV)."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of protein kinase C-alpha antisense oligonucleotide ISIS 3521 administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer.
Dorr, FA; Geary, RS; Holmlund, JT; Kindler, HL; Kunkel, K; Mani, S; Ratain, MJ; Rudin, CM, 2002
)
"When eniluracil is given with 5-FU/LV, DPD inhibition appears to be influenced by schedule, and the time to recovery is much longer than has been observed with eniluracil given alone."( Impact of two weekly schedules of oral eniluracil given with fluorouracil and leucovorin on the duration of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition.
Grem, JL; Guo, XD; Harold, N; Keith, B; Quinn, M; Schuler, B; Shapiro, J; Zentko, S, 2002
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC)."( Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.
Agelaki, S; Androulakis, N; Athanasiadis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kourousis, Ch; Mavroudis, D; Samonis, G; Souglakos, J; Tsetis, D; Vardakis, N, 2002
)
" Its combination with uracil in a molar ratio of 1:4 (UFT) increases the 5-FU concentration in tumor cells compared with ftorafur alone."( A phase I study of oral uracil-ftorafur plus folinic acid in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors.
Beck, J; Boehlke, I; Bokemeyer, C; Hartmann, JT; Kanz, L; Mayer, F; Schroeder, M; von Pawel, J, 2002
)
" Thus, clinical and economic data demonstrate that irinotecan, either in combination with irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the first line setting or as monotherapy in the second line setting, has a major role in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer."( Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cunningham, D; Falk, S; Jackson, D, 2002
)
" Studies of bimonthly regimens of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous infusion combined with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) have shown encouraging response rates in patients not responding to a bimonthly LV/5-FU regimen."( Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Atanackovic, D; Corovic, A; Gruber, Y; Hegewisch-Becker, S; Hossfeld, DK; Nierhaus, A; Pichlmeier, U, 2002
)
"Forty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had progressed during or within 3 months after completion of chemotherapy with LV/5-FU 24-h infusion (LV/5-FU(24h)) (eight patients) or irinotecan combined with or after LV/5-FU(24h )(36 patients), were treated with L-OHP 85 mg/m(2), 2-h intravenous (i."( Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Atanackovic, D; Corovic, A; Gruber, Y; Hegewisch-Becker, S; Hossfeld, DK; Nierhaus, A; Pichlmeier, U, 2002
)
" Hyperthermic treatment combined with L-OHP/LV/5-FU showed no unexpected toxicities."( Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Atanackovic, D; Corovic, A; Gruber, Y; Hegewisch-Becker, S; Hossfeld, DK; Nierhaus, A; Pichlmeier, U, 2002
)
" This phase I study was designed to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly cisplatin in combination with standard doses of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), 30 min) and 5-FU (750 mg/m(2), 24 h)/folinic acid (200 mg/m(2), 30 min)."( Phase I study of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.
Arnold, D; Hoepffner, N; Kern, M; Neuhaus, P; Oettle, H; Riess, H; Settmacher, U, 2002
)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative radiation therapy for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma (T3-T4) when delivered in combination with chemotherapy (oral tegafur-uracil modulated with leucovorin)."( Efficacy of preoperative radiation therapy for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma when combined with oral tegafur-uracil modulated with leucovorin: results from a phase II study.
Batlle, JF; Carpeño, Jde C; García, AG; Grande, AG; Juberías, AM; Olivar, LM; Piñeiro, EH; Sánchez Santos, ME; Uzcudun, AE; Velasco, JC, 2002
)
"Our neoadjuvant radiation therapy protocol is efficient for the preoperative treatment of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma when combined with chemotherapy (oral tegafur-uracil modulated with leucovorin)."( Efficacy of preoperative radiation therapy for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma when combined with oral tegafur-uracil modulated with leucovorin: results from a phase II study.
Batlle, JF; Carpeño, Jde C; García, AG; Grande, AG; Juberías, AM; Olivar, LM; Piñeiro, EH; Sánchez Santos, ME; Uzcudun, AE; Velasco, JC, 2002
)
"This multicentre phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with the Nordic schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Frödin, JE; Glimelius, B; Kjaer, M; Linné, T; Oulid-Aïssa, D; Pfeiffer, P; Pyrhönen, S; Ristamäki, R; Skovsgaard, T; Tveit, KM, 2002
)
"Irinotecan combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of 5-FU/FA is active in advanced colorectal cancer with an easily managed safety profile which ensures good schedule compliance."( Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Frödin, JE; Glimelius, B; Kjaer, M; Linné, T; Oulid-Aïssa, D; Pfeiffer, P; Pyrhönen, S; Ristamäki, R; Skovsgaard, T; Tveit, KM, 2002
)
" Thus, Rofecoxib did not appear to increase antitumor activity and resulted in increased gastrointestinal toxicity when combined with 5-FU/LV."( Increased toxicity and lack of efficacy of Rofecoxib in combination with chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase II study.
Ashfaq, R; Becerra, CR; Frenkel, EP; Gaynor, RB, 2003
)
" One course of nedaplatin, 5-FU and LV combined with radiation was performed alternatively."( [Effect of nedaplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin combined with radiation therapy in unresectable esophageal carcinoma].
Futami, R; Makino, H; Maruyama, H; Miyashita, M; Miyashita, T; Nomura, T; Sasajima, K; Tajiri, T; Tateno, A, 2003
)
"A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy."( Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Adenis, A; Baulieux, J; Colin, P; Couzigou, P; Douillard, JY; Ducreux, M; Fallik, D; Jacob, J; Mahjoubi, M; Mahjoubi, R; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF; Ychou, M, 2003
)
" We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of CCI-779 in combination with leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced solid tumors."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779, a novel cytostatic cell-cycle inhibitor, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Boni, J; Bruntsch, U; Peters, M; Punt, CJ; Thielert, C, 2003
)
" If CCI-779 is to be used in combination with 5-FU/LV, other doses or schedules of administration will need to be explored."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779, a novel cytostatic cell-cycle inhibitor, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Boni, J; Bruntsch, U; Peters, M; Punt, CJ; Thielert, C, 2003
)
" The use of irinotecan together with raltitrexed is also being investigated, as is its combination with oxaliplatin."( Irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: dose intensification and combination with new agents, including biological response modifiers.
Ducreux, M; Köhne, CH; Schwartz, GK; Vanhoefer, U, 2003
)
"Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer."( A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Bouzid, K; Khalfallah, S; Padrik, P; Piko, B; Plate, S; Pshevloutsky, EM; Purkalne, G; Serafy, M; Tujakowski, J, 2003
)
" This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity of paclitaxel combined with semimonthly 5-FU/Leucovorin for the AGC patients."( [Preliminary report of semimonthly 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with paclitaxel in treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC)].
He, YJ; Hu, PL; Li, YH; Liu, DG; Liu, MZ; Qian, SY; Qiu, HJ; Teng, XY; Tian, WH; Xiang, XJ; Xu, RH; Zhang, B; Zhou, NN; Zhou, ZM, 2003
)
"Semimonthly 5-FU/LV combined with paclitaxel has high release rate but comparatively mild toxicity for AGC patients."( [Preliminary report of semimonthly 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with paclitaxel in treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC)].
He, YJ; Hu, PL; Li, YH; Liu, DG; Liu, MZ; Qian, SY; Qiu, HJ; Teng, XY; Tian, WH; Xiang, XJ; Xu, RH; Zhang, B; Zhou, NN; Zhou, ZM, 2003
)
" irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks."( Multimodal therapy with intravenous biweekly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combined with hepatic arterial infusion pirarubicin in non-resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (a European Association for Research in Oncology trial).
Auroux, J; Aziza, T; Braud, AC; Bugat, R; Buyse, M; Cherqui, D; Dupuis, O; Fagniez, PL; Ganem, G; Guimbaud, R; Haddad, E; Kobeiter, H; Piedbois, P; Piolot, A; Tayar, C; Valleur, P; Zelek, L, 2003
)
"The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with 24 h-continuous infusion of 5-flourouracil (FU) plus folinic acid, and to assess the toxicity and activity in patients with previously treated colorectal and gastric cancer."( Protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil plus high-dose folinic acid combined with bolus mitomycin C in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a phase I/II dose escalation study.
Bokemeyer, C; Hartmann, JT; Hofheinz, RD; Honecker, F; Käfer, G; Kanz, L; Köhne, CH; Nehls, O; Oechsle, K; Quietzsch, D; Wein, A, 2003
)
"This Nordic multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer."( Multicenter phase II study of Nordic fluorouracil and folinic acid bolus schedule combined with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berglund, A; Braendengen, M; Dahl, O; Fokstuen, T; Glimelius, B; Sørbye, H; Tveit, KM; Øgreid, D, 2004
)
"Oxaliplatin combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of FU+FA (Nordic FLOX) is a well-tolerated, effective, and feasible bolus schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that yields comparable results compared with more complex schedules."( Multicenter phase II study of Nordic fluorouracil and folinic acid bolus schedule combined with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berglund, A; Braendengen, M; Dahl, O; Fokstuen, T; Glimelius, B; Sørbye, H; Tveit, KM; Øgreid, D, 2004
)
" After the operation, weekly bolus of 5-fluorouracil combined with levofolinate was carried out."( [A case of rectal cancer with distant lymph node metastases completely responding to postoperative chemotherapy with levofolinate combined with 5-fluorouracil].
Inoue, M; Jingu, K; Nakajima, Y; Ochiai, T, 2004
)
" Oxaliplatin combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of 5-FU/ FA (Nordic FLOX) appears to be well tolerated, effective and feasible as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer yielding results comparable with those obtained by more complex schedules."( Nordic 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin bolus schedule combined with oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Dahl, O; Sørbye, H, 2003
)
"Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of systemic oxaliplatin (Oxa) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)."( Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.
Ehrsson, H; Fester, C; Guthoff, I; Kornmann, M; Lotspeich, E; Schatz, M; Wallin, I,
)
"We designed a phase II trial using Oxa in combination with 5-FU/FA and mitomycin C (MMC) for HAI treatment of patients with isolated non-resectable CRLM."( Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.
Ehrsson, H; Fester, C; Guthoff, I; Kornmann, M; Lotspeich, E; Schatz, M; Wallin, I,
)
"We conclude from our results that Oxa in combination with 5-FU/FA and MMC may be a feasible protocol for HAI treatment without major toxicity, especially avoiding higher grade neurotoxicity."( Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.
Ehrsson, H; Fester, C; Guthoff, I; Kornmann, M; Lotspeich, E; Schatz, M; Wallin, I,
)
"The purpose of our study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, safety profile, and pharmacokinetics of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM486A given in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in cancer patients."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM486A in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bootle, D; Bridgewater, J; Choi, L; de Bruijn, P; Eskens, FA; Ledermann, JA; Mueller, C; Planting, AS; Sklenar, I; Sparreboom, A; van Zuylen, L; Verweij, J, 2004
)
"The novel molecular agent SAM486A is tolerable and safe in combination with a standard 5-FU regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM486A in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bootle, D; Bridgewater, J; Choi, L; de Bruijn, P; Eskens, FA; Ledermann, JA; Mueller, C; Planting, AS; Sklenar, I; Sparreboom, A; van Zuylen, L; Verweij, J, 2004
)
"Mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus folinic acid (FA) is an effective treatment for metastatic gastrointestinal cancer."( Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with mitomycin C, infusional 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid. A phase-I-study in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Gnad, U; Hartmann, JT; Hehlmann, R; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Kreil, S; Saussele, S; Weisser, A; Willer, A, 2004
)
" In 10 of 19 patients who had not responded (SD, PD), three additional courses of chemotherapy were combined with sCMT (with 25 sCMT applications)."( Whole-body hyperthermia in the scope of von Ardenne's systemic cancer multistep therapy (sCMT) combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study.
Ahlers, O; Deja, M; Dräger, J; Felix, R; Hildebrandt, B; Kerner, T; Löffel, J; Riess, H; Stroszczynski, C; Wust, P, 2004
)
"This multicentre phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan when combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid according to the Mayo Clinic schedule and to evaluate the activity of this combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
"Diarrhoea was dose limiting at 300 mg/m2 irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid, and this was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
"This regimen of irinotecan in combination with the Mayo Clinic schedule of bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid every four weeks showed activity as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
"To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (IHCP) combined with intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer."( [Postoperative intraperitioneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion combined with intravenous chemotherapy for 82 advanced gastric cancer patients].
Lu, JF; Lu, WD; Shen, D; Xu, M; Zuo, Y, 2004
)
"Eighty-two patients with stage II - IV gastric cancer were postoperatively randomized into two groups; 46 patients in treatment group who received IHCP combined with intravenous chemotherapy for three times and 36 patients in control group who received intravenous chemotherapy only for six times."( [Postoperative intraperitioneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion combined with intravenous chemotherapy for 82 advanced gastric cancer patients].
Lu, JF; Lu, WD; Shen, D; Xu, M; Zuo, Y, 2004
)
"Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion combined with intravenous chemotherapy can prolong survival and reduce gastrointestinal side-effect which provides an effective treatment option for advanced gastric cancer."( [Postoperative intraperitioneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion combined with intravenous chemotherapy for 82 advanced gastric cancer patients].
Lu, JF; Lu, WD; Shen, D; Xu, M; Zuo, Y, 2004
)
"This phase I study was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumours, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and the dose for use in future studies."( An NCIC CTG phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase and angiogenesis inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Agarwal, V; Chouinard, E; Goel, R; Hirte, H; Huan, S; Humphrey, R; Lathia, C; Matthews, S; Roach, J; Seymour, L; Stafford, S; Stewart, DJ; Walsh, W; Waterfield, B, 2005
)
" was given with 350 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil/20 mg/m2 leucovorin x 5 days q28 days."( An NCIC CTG phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase and angiogenesis inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
Agarwal, V; Chouinard, E; Goel, R; Hirte, H; Huan, S; Humphrey, R; Lathia, C; Matthews, S; Roach, J; Seymour, L; Stafford, S; Stewart, DJ; Walsh, W; Waterfield, B, 2005
)
"We performed radio-frequency ablation (RFA) therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy for a 71-year old female gastric cancer patient with liver metastasis."( [A case of gastric cancer patient with liver metastasis treated by radiofrequency ablation therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy].
Imaizumi, H; Kamei, K; Kosaka, T; Nakano, Y; Takashima, S; Ueno, K; Usami, K, 2004
)
" To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on the patients with gastric carcinoma after palliative gastric resection, we analyzed all of the cases of gastric adenocarcinoma undergone palliative gastric resection in our Cancer Center in recent years."( [Palliative surgery combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer].
Chen, YB; Guan, YX; Li, W; Li, YF; Sun, XW; Xu, DZ; Zhan, YQ, 2004
)
"Our aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin."( Phase I dose escalation study of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Chen, JS; Huang, JS; Liau, CT; Lin, YC; Rau, KM; Wang, HM; Yang, TS, 2005
)
"Mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a well-tolerated active combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer."( Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and mitomycin C in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial.
Gnad-Vogt, SU; Hehlmann, R; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Kreil, S; Pilz, L; Saussele, S; Willeke, F; Willer, A, 2005
)
" This study is a preliminary clinical investigation to determine if HA could be safely used in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and doxorubicin (DOX)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of intravenous hyaluronic acid in combination with doxorubicin or 5-fluorouracil.
Brown, TJ; Ellis, A; Fox, RM; Gibbs, P; Heldin, P; Li, L; Rosenthal, MA; Uren, S; Wong, S, 2005
)
"Thirty patients with metastatic cancer were intravenously administered 500 mg/m2 HA in combination with escalating doses of DOX (30-60 mg/m2) or 5-FU (cumulative dose of 1,350-2,250 mg/m2 per cycle)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of intravenous hyaluronic acid in combination with doxorubicin or 5-fluorouracil.
Brown, TJ; Ellis, A; Fox, RM; Gibbs, P; Heldin, P; Li, L; Rosenthal, MA; Uren, S; Wong, S, 2005
)
" Here, we describe efficacy and safety results for the third patient cohort in this trial, who received BV combined with FU/LV, and compare them with results for concurrently enrolled patients who received IFL."( Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berlin, J; Fehrenbacher, L; Hainsworth, JD; Hambleton, J; Heim, W; Holmgren, E; Hurwitz, HI; Kabbinavar, F; Novotny, WF, 2005
)
"To explore the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma."( [Irinotecan combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced/metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Wu, WQ; Yu, BM, 2005
)
" CPT-11 combined with capecitabine are not only more effective, but also its occurrence of side effect is lowered, and are especially high effective for lung metastasis."( [Irinotecan combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced/metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Wu, WQ; Yu, BM, 2005
)
" Treatment with triple therapy using octreotide, galanin and serotonin appear to be comparable to 5-FU/LV in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin."( Comparison between triple therapy with octreotide, galanin and serotonin vs. irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leukovorin in human colon cancer.
El-Salhy, M; Hilding, L; Royson, H; Tjomsland, V, 2005
)
"To evaluate the effect and acute toxicity of late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage III and IV a nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)."( [Late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage III and IV a nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Feng, LP; Lin, Q; Wu, H; Yang, ZX; Yu, ZH, 2005
)
"Ninety-six patients with stage III and IV a NPC were randomly divided into 2 groups: test group (n = 46, undergoing late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy) and control group (n = 50, undergoing conventional radiotherapy)."( [Late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage III and IV a nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Feng, LP; Lin, Q; Wu, H; Yang, ZX; Yu, ZH, 2005
)
"Late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy effectively improves the disease control, delays the distant metastasis, and alleviates radioactivity damnification."( [Late course conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage III and IV a nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Feng, LP; Lin, Q; Wu, H; Yang, ZX; Yu, ZH, 2005
)
" Bevacizumab is currently approved for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC and is currently being tested in combination with standard therapies for a range of indications."( Bevacizumab combined with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens to treat colorectal cancer.
Hurwitz, H; Kabbinavar, F, 2005
)
" Here, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and 5-FU administered in combination with leucovorin in Korean advanced colorectal cancer patients."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with leucovorin in Korean patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Cho, HK; Chung, SJ; Kang, JH; Kim, DD; Kuh, HJ; Lee, ES; Lee, JW; Lee, KS; Park, JK; Shim, CK, 2006
)
" Between February 2002 and October 2002, 64 patients received UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) from day 1 to day 14 combined with oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1, every 3 weeks."( 'A phase II study of oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin combined with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer'.
Bennouna, J; Bordenave, S; Cvitkovic, F; Dorval, E; Douillard, JY; Hebbar, M; Jacob, JH; Malek, K; Paillot, B; Perrier, H; Priou, F; Seitz, JF; Tonelli, D, 2006
)
"Twice weekly SU5416 can be administered with bolus IFL without unexpected toxicities or altering the pharmacokinetic behavior of the administered drugs."( Phase I/pilot study of SU5416 (semaxinib) in combination with irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV (IFL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berlin, JD; Cropp, GF; Donnelly, E; Fleischer, AC; Hande, KR; Hannah, AL; Lockhart, AC; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Schumaker, RD, 2006
)
"To establish a safe and practical chemotherapeutic regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in an outpatient setting, a phase I clinical trial was conducted."( A phase I trial of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Emi, M; Kawabuchi, Y; Minami, K; Yamaguchi, Y,
)
"These results suggest that our treatment regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU/LV is a safe regimen in an outpatient setting and effective for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( A phase I trial of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Emi, M; Kawabuchi, Y; Minami, K; Yamaguchi, Y,
)
"To investigate the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-DCRT) in combination with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer."( Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer.
He, C; Hu, JB; Sun, XN; Wang, Q; Xu, J; Yang, QC, 2006
)
"Forty-eight patients with unresectable recurrent rectal cancer were randomized and treated by 3-DCRT or 3-DCRT combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy between September 2001 and October 2003."( Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer.
He, C; Hu, JB; Sun, XN; Wang, Q; Xu, J; Yang, QC, 2006
)
"Three-dimensional conformal radio-therapy combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer is a feasible and effective therapeutic approach, and can reduce distant metastasis rate and improve the survival rate."( Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer.
He, C; Hu, JB; Sun, XN; Wang, Q; Xu, J; Yang, QC, 2006
)
"To evaluate the efficacy of Avastin in combination with irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer."( [Efficacy of Avastin in combination with irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer].
Chen, JZ; Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Zheng, H, 2006
)
"Patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to this single arm phase II multi-center cooperative group trial of bevacizumab combined with IFL."( A phase II study of high-dose bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, as initial therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E2200.
Benson, AB; Catalano, PJ; Giantonio, BJ; Levy, DE; Meropol, NJ; O'dwyer, PJ, 2006
)
"Levamisole combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was previously shown to significantly reduce tumor relapses and improve patient survival when given postoperatively in patients with resected stage III colon cancer."( Randomized clinical trial of high-dose levamisole combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk colon cancer.
Krook, JE; Kugler, JW; Mahoney, MR; Morton, RF; O'Connell, MJ; Rayson, S; Rowland, KM; Sargent, DJ; Shepherd, L; Windschitl, HE, 2006
)
"Eight hundred seventy-eight patients who had undergone complete surgical resection of high-risk stage II/III colon cancer were stratified by known prognostic factors and randomized to receive 1 of 2 treatment regimens: standard-dose levamisole combined with 5-FU and leucovorin; or high-dose levamisole combined with the same chemotherapy."( Randomized clinical trial of high-dose levamisole combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk colon cancer.
Krook, JE; Kugler, JW; Mahoney, MR; Morton, RF; O'Connell, MJ; Rayson, S; Rowland, KM; Sargent, DJ; Shepherd, L; Windschitl, HE, 2006
)
"It was not possible to improve the efficacy of surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer by giving levamisole at its maximum tolerated dose in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin."( Randomized clinical trial of high-dose levamisole combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk colon cancer.
Krook, JE; Kugler, JW; Mahoney, MR; Morton, RF; O'Connell, MJ; Rayson, S; Rowland, KM; Sargent, DJ; Shepherd, L; Windschitl, HE, 2006
)
" We designed a new regimen to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of weekly low dose CPT-11 combined with 5-FU/l-LV therapy based on an RPMI regimen against advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer."( [Evaluation of weekly low-dose CPT-11 combined with 5-FU/l-LV therapy for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer--preliminary study].
Deguchi, Y; Kaneko, I; Kii, E; Murata, T; Sonoda, K; Tsubono, M; Yasuda, K, 2006
)
" After that his general condition recovered, and two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (IFL) therapy were performed on an outpatient basis."( [A case of advanced rectal carcinoma with multiple lung metastases responding to irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (IFL) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)].
Fukada, T; Hasegawa, A; Hashimoto, R; Hayashi, T; Kametaka, H; Kawano, H; Koyama, T; Seike, K; Tanaka, H; Yasuno, K, 2006
)
"Irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 combined with an infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) is a standard first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bressole, F; Chalbos, P; Debrigode, C; Desseigne, F; Duffour, J; Gourgou, S; Mineur, L; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
"Patients received FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to six cycles, comprising a 5-FU/LV regimen combined with irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 (cycle 1), increasing to 220 mg/m2 (cycle 2) and 260 mg/m2 (cycle 3 and subsequent cycles) dependent on toxicity."( Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bressole, F; Chalbos, P; Debrigode, C; Desseigne, F; Duffour, J; Gourgou, S; Mineur, L; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with calcium folinate and fluorouracil (OXA-LV5FU2) regimen as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer."( [Oxaliplatin in combination with calcium folinate and fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].
Fang, Y; Li, F; Li, J; Wang, YJ, 2006
)
"Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, was approved in 2004 for use in combination with intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer."( Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy: first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hochster, HS, 2006
)
"The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with FOLFIRI as a first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma."( Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FOLCETUX study).
Berardi, R; Cascinu, S; Ceccarelli, C; Di Fabio, F; Funaioli, C; Giannetta, L; Giaquinta, S; Longobardi, C; Martoni, AA; Mutri, V; Piana, E; Pinto, C; Rojas Llimpe, FL; Siena, S, 2007
)
" This phase I/II dose-finding study evaluated gefitinib in combination with a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA)/irinotecan (FOLFIRI-AIO) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Gefitinib in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid and irinotecan in patients with 5-FU/oxaliplatin- refractory colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO).
Arnold, D; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Kubicka, S; Wollert, J, 2006
)
"This open-label, phase IB study was undertaken to determine the safety/toxicity profile and recommended dose of oral once-daily PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) combined with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( A phase IB, open-label dose-escalating study of the oral angiogenesis inhibitor PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), in combination with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Bartel, C; Henry, A; Laurent, D; Masson, E; Poethig, M; Steward, W; Thomas, AL; Trarbach, T; Vanhoefer, U; Wang, J; Wiedenmann, B, 2007
)
"The MTD of PTK/ZK in combination with FOLFOX4 in this patient population is 1250 mg daily."( A phase IB, open-label dose-escalating study of the oral angiogenesis inhibitor PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), in combination with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Bartel, C; Henry, A; Laurent, D; Masson, E; Poethig, M; Steward, W; Thomas, AL; Trarbach, T; Vanhoefer, U; Wang, J; Wiedenmann, B, 2007
)
"This randomised phase II study evaluates the safety and efficacy profile of uracil/tegafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX)."( Uracil/ftorafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of randomised phase II study.
Aitini, E; Bajetta, E; Barone, C; Buzzoni, R; Di Bartolomeo, M; Ferrario, E; Iop, A; Isa, L; Jacobelli, S; Lo Vullo, S; Mariani, L; Pinotti, G; Recaldin, E; Zilembo, N, 2007
)
" This trial assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of erlotinib combined with FOLFOX."( Phase 1b dose escalation study of erlotinib in combination with infusional 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bolling, C; Brennscheidt, U; Cassidy, J; Díaz-Rubio, E; Fettner, S; Feyereislova, A; Hanauske, AR; Jones, RJ; Rakhit, A; Sastre, J, 2007
)
" The objective of this Phase I study was to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of imatinib in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancer."( Imatinib mesylate for targeting the platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory pancreatic, bile duct, colorectal, or gastric cancer--a dose-escalation Phase I trial.
Al-Batran, SE; Atmaca, A; Ehninger, G; Hosius, C; Jäger, E; Pauligk, C; Schleyer, E, 2007
)
"We conducted a randomised phase II study to compare irinotecan monotherapy with irinotecan in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) regarding efficacy and safety of these regimens in second-line therapy after failed fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( A randomised phase II study of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Arnold, D; Graeven, U; Heuer, T; Nusch, A; Porschen, R; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W, 2007
)
"Our study confirms that irinotecan alone or in combination with infusional 5-FU/FA is an effective and safe regimen for CRC patients who failed first-line therapies."( A randomised phase II study of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Arnold, D; Graeven, U; Heuer, T; Nusch, A; Porschen, R; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W, 2007
)
" Antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy improves survival in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer."( Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200.
Alberts, SR; Benson, AB; Catalano, PJ; Giantonio, BJ; Meropol, NJ; Mitchell, EP; O'Dwyer, PJ; Schwartz, MA, 2007
)
"This phase III clinical trial evaluated the impact on disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to bolus weekly fluorouracil (FU) combined with leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer."( Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07.
Atkins, JN; Colangelo, LH; Colman, LK; Conley, BA; Fehrenbacher, L; Findlay, MP; Flynn, PJ; Goodwin, JW; Kuebler, JP; Lanier, KS; Levine, EA; O'Connell, MJ; Petrelli, NJ; Ramanathan, RK; Seay, TE; Smith, RE; Soori, G; Wieand, HS; Wolmark, N; Yothers, G; Zapas, JL, 2007
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity of front line FOLFOX4 combined with bevacizumab in patients with metastatsic CRC (mCRC)."( Front-line bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.
Agelaki, S; Androulakis, N; Chatzidakis, A; Christophylakis, C; Diamandidou, E; Emmanouilides, C; Georgoulias, V; Kalbakis, K; Kalykaki, A; Kotsakis, A; Mavroudis, D; Sfakiotaki, G; Souglakos, J; Touroutoglou, N; Vamvakas, L, 2007
)
"Gefitinib, an orally active inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, combined with chemotherapy, has shown efficacy as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)."( First clinical experience of orally active epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor combined with simplified FOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boselli, S; de Braud, F; Lorizzo, K; Magni, E; Martignetti, A; Massacesi, C; Santoro, L; Zampino, MG; Zaniboni, A; Zorzino, L, 2007
)
"Patients with metastatic EGFR-positive CRC received gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg/day combined with simplified FOLFOX6."( First clinical experience of orally active epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor combined with simplified FOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boselli, S; de Braud, F; Lorizzo, K; Magni, E; Martignetti, A; Massacesi, C; Santoro, L; Zampino, MG; Zaniboni, A; Zorzino, L, 2007
)
"This phase I study was designed to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with FOLFOX4 [oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] in patients with solid tumors."( Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the safety and tolerability of lapatinib (GW572016) in combination with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in patients with solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Boot, H; Keessen, M; Koch, KM; Pandite, L; Richel, DJ; Schellens, JH; Siegel-Lakhai, WS; Smith, DA; Versola, M; Vervenne, WL, 2007
)
" No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the OTR was established at 1,500 mg/d lapatinib in combination with the standard FOLFOX4 regimen."( Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the safety and tolerability of lapatinib (GW572016) in combination with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in patients with solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Boot, H; Keessen, M; Koch, KM; Pandite, L; Richel, DJ; Schellens, JH; Siegel-Lakhai, WS; Smith, DA; Versola, M; Vervenne, WL, 2007
)
"Lapatinib can be safely administered in combination with the standard FOLFOX4 regimen."( Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the safety and tolerability of lapatinib (GW572016) in combination with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in patients with solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Boot, H; Keessen, M; Koch, KM; Pandite, L; Richel, DJ; Schellens, JH; Siegel-Lakhai, WS; Smith, DA; Versola, M; Vervenne, WL, 2007
)
"This study assessed the clinical activity and safety of twice-weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (TP-HDFL) in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma."( Multifractionated paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Cheng, AL; Hsu, C; Hsu, CH; Hsu, WL; Lin, CC; Tsai, YC; Yang, CH; Yeh, KH, 2007
)
" Resection of liver metastases from SBA combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy can result in extended disease-free survival and should undergo further investigation."( Resection of small bowel adenocarcinoma liver metastasis combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy results in extended disease-free period--a case report.
Eigenbrod, T; Klebl, F; Kullmann, F, 2006
)
"This study determined the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR) of oral lapatinib administered in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the combination."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lapatinib in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan.
Flaherty, KT; Fleming, RA; Kerr, DJ; Koch, KM; Middleton, MR; Midgley, RS; O'Dwyer, PJ; Pratap, SE; Smith, DA; Stevenson, JP; Versola, M; Ward, C, 2007
)
"To assess the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of endogenetic field hyperthermia (EFH) in combination with L-OHP /LV / 5-FU in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( [Postoperative abdominal endogenic field hyperthermia combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of 68 cases of advanced gastric cancer].
Huang, KH; Lin, XG; Liu, TH; Xie, DR, 2007
)
"EFH combined with the chemotherapeutic regimen FOLFOX might improve the therapeutic effect of stage II-IV gastric cancer without obviously increasing the adverse effects."( [Postoperative abdominal endogenic field hyperthermia combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of 68 cases of advanced gastric cancer].
Huang, KH; Lin, XG; Liu, TH; Xie, DR, 2007
)
"This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with standard oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in the first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Phase II trial of cetuximab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
André, T; Casado, E; Cervantes, A; Ciardiello, F; de Gramont, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Humblet, Y; Kisker, O; Soulié, P; Tabernero, J; Tortora, G; Valera, JS; Van Cutsem, E; Van Laethem, JL; Verslype, C, 2007
)
"Cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-4 is a highly active first-line treatment for mCRC, showing encouraging RR, mPFS, and mOS values."( Phase II trial of cetuximab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
André, T; Casado, E; Cervantes, A; Ciardiello, F; de Gramont, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Humblet, Y; Kisker, O; Soulié, P; Tabernero, J; Tortora, G; Valera, JS; Van Cutsem, E; Van Laethem, JL; Verslype, C, 2007
)
"To determine the recommended dose (RD) of EKB-569, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
"The RD of EKB-569 is 25 mg/day when combined with FOLFIRI and results in complete EGFR inhibition."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
"To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse reaction of Aidi Injection (ADI) combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and controlled with those of FOLFOX4 regimen alone."( [Comparative study on treatment of advanced colorectal cancer by Aidi injection combined with FOLFOX4 regimen and by FOLFOX4 regimen alone].
Dong, L; Fu, SY; Li, HJ, 2007
)
"Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU/leucovorin or capecitabine was generally well tolerated in elderly patients."( Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Arkenau, HT; Englisch-Fritz, C; Freier, W; Graeven, U; Greil, R; Grothey, A; Hinke, A; Kretzschmar, A; Kubicka, S; Porschen, R; Schmiegel, W; Schmoll, HJ; Seufferlein, T, 2008
)
"To test the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy combined with cisplatin (PMC-cisplatin) as induction chemotherapy (ICT) before definitive treatment in patients with respectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)."( Effectiveness of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy combined with cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer: phase II study.
Chang, PM; Chang, SY; Chen, PM; Chu, PY; Huang, JL; Tai, SK; Tsai, TL; Wang, LW; Wang, YF; Yang, MH, 2008
)
"This two-part phase Ib/II study investigated the feasibility of administering cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) in a weekly schedule (AIO FUFOX protocol) as first-line treatment in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-detectable advanced colorectal cancer."( Cetuximab in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FUFOX) in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II study of the AIO GI Group.
Arnold, D; Dittrich, C; Herrmann, T; Höhler, T; Lordick, F; Riemann, J; Schmoll, HJ; Seufferlein, T; Wöll, E; Zubel, A, 2008
)
" Cetuximab combined with FUFOX was generally well tolerated with the most common grade 3/4 adverse events being diarrhea (27%) and paresthesia (16%)."( Cetuximab in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FUFOX) in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II study of the AIO GI Group.
Arnold, D; Dittrich, C; Herrmann, T; Höhler, T; Lordick, F; Riemann, J; Schmoll, HJ; Seufferlein, T; Wöll, E; Zubel, A, 2008
)
"Gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg daily in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil at 2,000 mg/m(2) or gefitinib at a dose of 500 mg daily with 5-fluorouracil at 1,600 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin has an acceptable safety profile."( Gefitinib in combination with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in irinotecan-refractory patients with colorectal cancer: a phase I study of the Arbeits gemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).
Bokemeyer, C; Hartmann, JT; Höhler, T; Holtmann, M; Kröning, H; Pintoffl, JP, 2008
)
"Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with or without leucovorin (LV), is effective and well tolerated for first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)."( A four-arm, randomized, multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin combined with varying schedules of 5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy in previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer.
Bernard, SA; Bjarnason, GA; Braich, T; Desimone, P; Evars, JP; Hrushesky, WJ; Jolivet, J; Ramanathan, RK, 2008
)
"This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC)."( Phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Chang, YF; Chao, TY; Chen, PM; Chiou, TJ; Chiu, CF; Chung, CY; Hwang, WS; Lin, SF, 2008
)
"The aim of the study was to assess the toxicity and the clinical activity of biweekly oxaliplatin (OXA) in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administered every 2 weeks (modified FOLFOX-4 regimen) in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC)."( Biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX-4 regimen) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Fu, Z; Guan, F; Guo, QS; Liu, ZF; Wang, MY; Yang, XG; Zhang, XQ, 2008
)
" Oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and 5-FU should be considered a feasible chemotherapy regimen for patients with recurrent/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma."( Phase II trial of oxaliplatin combined with leucovorin and fluorouracil for recurrent/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma.
Cho, JY; Jeung, HC; Lee, DK; Lee, SJ; Lim, JY; Mun, HS; Paik, YH; Yoon, DS, 2008
)
" We evaluated TM in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL)."( A pilot trial of the anti-angiogenic copper lowering agent tetrathiomolybdate in combination with irinotecan, 5-flurouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Brewer, GJ; Gartner, EM; Griffith, KA; Henja, GF; Merajver, SD; Pan, Q; Zalupski, MM, 2009
)
" The FOLFIRI regimen consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m(2); day 1) combined with leucovorin (200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) as a bolus and 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks."( Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer.
Bang, YJ; Im, SA; Kim, DY; Kim, JH; Kim, TY; Lee, JS; Lee, KW; Lim, JH; Oh, DY; Seo, MD; Yi, HG, 2008
)
" In this study, escalating doses of Bortezomib were administered along with the standard FOLFOX-4 doses, in order to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile and activity of the combination."( An EORTC phase I study of Bortezomib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Anthoney, A; Bauer, J; Caponigro, F; Govaerts, AS; Lacombe, D; Marréaud, S; Milano, A; Twelves, C, 2009
)
" This study was to evaluate the efficacy of three-dimensional conformal gamma-knife radiotherapy combined with thermochemotherapy on locally advanced pancreatic cancer."( [Efficacy of whole body gamma-knife radiotherapy combined with thermochemotherapy on locally advanced pancreatic cancer].
Cai, CL; Kang, JB; Li, JG; Nie, Q; Qi, WJ; Wang, B; Zhang, LP, 2008
)
"3-D conformal gamma-knife radiotherapy combined with thermochemotherapy is well tolerated and is relatively effective for most patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer."( [Efficacy of whole body gamma-knife radiotherapy combined with thermochemotherapy on locally advanced pancreatic cancer].
Cai, CL; Kang, JB; Li, JG; Nie, Q; Qi, WJ; Wang, B; Zhang, LP, 2008
)
"To evaluate the efficacy of r oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin calcium (LV) combined with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of local advanced gastric cancer."( [Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin calcium combined with concurrent radiotherapy for local advanced gastric cancer].
Shao, ZY; Zhang, JD, 2008
)
"Radiotherapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy may be an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with advanced and metastatic gastric cancer."( [Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin calcium combined with concurrent radiotherapy for local advanced gastric cancer].
Shao, ZY; Zhang, JD, 2008
)
"This prospective study was conducted with the Korean Cancer Study Group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as first-line treatment in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer and to identify potential predictive biomarkers."( Phase II study and biomarker analysis of cetuximab combined with modified FOLFOX6 in advanced gastric cancer.
Bang, YJ; Choi, IS; Han, SW; Im, SA; Kim, MA; Kim, TY; Kim, WH; Lee, KH; Lee, KW; Lee, MH; Lee, NS; Oh, DY; Park, SR; Song, HS, 2009
)
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the POF regimen (biweekly 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC)."( A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in combination with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Chen, L; Fan, NF; Guo, ZQ; Lin, RB; Liu, J; Wang, XJ, 2008
)
"A total of 342 patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy: FOLFIRI-3 [n = 109, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 3 combined with leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m(2) day 1 and 46-h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2)], FOLFIRI-1 (n = 112, irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1 combined with LV 400 mg/m(2) day 1, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-h continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2)) and other various irinotecan-based regimens (n = 121)."( Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study.
André, T; Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Bidard, FC; Cervantes, A; de Gramont, A; Figer, A; Lledo, G; Louvet, C; Mabro, M; Maindrault-Goebel, F; Tournigand, C, 2009
)
" Purposes of this study were to determine the recommended phase II dose of cediranib in combination with standard doses of modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of this combination in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I study of cediranib in combination with oxaliplatin and infusional 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Chen, E; Gauthier, I; Jonker, D; MacLean, M; Powers, J; Seymour, L; Wells, J, 2009
)
" The recommended phase II dose is cediranib at 30 mg daily continuously in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX-6."( Phase I study of cediranib in combination with oxaliplatin and infusional 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Chen, E; Gauthier, I; Jonker, D; MacLean, M; Powers, J; Seymour, L; Wells, J, 2009
)
" Moreover, in combination with 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid (5FU-FA) or with Raltitrexed (RTX), both commonly used in the treatment of this disease, it showed a clear schedule-dependent synergistic antiproliferative interaction as demonstrated by calculating combination indexes."( Modulation of thymidilate synthase and p53 expression by HDAC inhibitor vorinostat resulted in synergistic antitumor effect in combination with 5FU or raltitrexed.
Avallone, A; Bruzzese, F; Budillon, A; Delrio, P; Di Gennaro, E; Leone, A; Pepe, S; Subbarayan, PR, 2009
)
" This phase I/II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT plus leucovorin (LV) for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of twenty-four-hour infusion of irinotecan in combination with oral UFT plus leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Tanaka, A, 2009
)
"A 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT/LV is feasible and active for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of twenty-four-hour infusion of irinotecan in combination with oral UFT plus leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Tanaka, A, 2009
)
"This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab combined with irinotecan, folinic acid (FA) and two different doses of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of EGFR-detectable metastatic colorectal cancer."( Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (FOLFIRI) in the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre two-part phase I/II study.
Brezault, C; Cals, L; Husseini, F; Loos, AH; Nippgen, J; Peeters, M; Raoul, JL; Rougier, P; Van Laethem, JL, 2009
)
"We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.
Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Pendyala, L; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Toth, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
"The maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat in combination with FOLFOX is 300 mg orally twice daily x 1 week every 2 weeks."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.
Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Pendyala, L; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Toth, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
"To investigate the safety and immunological responses of personalized peptide vaccination in combination with oral administration of UFT and UZEL for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), fourteen patients were enrolled in the present study."( Immunological evaluation of personalized peptide vaccination in combination with UFT and UZEL for metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients.
Hattori, T; Itoh, K; Komatsu, N; Mine, T; Okuno, K; Shiozaki, H; Yamada, A, 2009
)
"This oxaliplatin combined with ELF regimen shows good efficacy and acceptable safety in advanced gastric cancer patients."( [Oxaliplatin combined with ELF regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer].
Lou, F; Pan, HM; Zhu, YH, 2009
)
"The chemotherapy of bevacizumab combined with irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin results in better efficacy in patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer."( [Clinical research of bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer].
Chen, B; Chen, JZ; Cui, F; Luo, RC; Wan, C; Zheng, H, 2009
)
"Bevacizumab (Avastin) significantly improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with first-line irinotecan (IFL) plus bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Phase IV study of bevacizumab in combination with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ackland, S; Chiara, S; Clarke, S; Gapski, J; Langer, B; Mainwaring, P; Perez-Carrión, R; Sobrero, A; Young, S, 2009
)
"1 months and is comparable to that observed in published phase III and community-based trials using first-line bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI, and to phase III trials using bevacizumab in combination with bolus 5-FU/LV plus IFL."( Phase IV study of bevacizumab in combination with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ackland, S; Chiara, S; Clarke, S; Gapski, J; Langer, B; Mainwaring, P; Perez-Carrión, R; Sobrero, A; Young, S, 2009
)
"Bevacizumab combined with first-line FOLFIRI is an effective and well-tolerated therapy option for patients with metastatic CRC."( Phase IV study of bevacizumab in combination with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ackland, S; Chiara, S; Clarke, S; Gapski, J; Langer, B; Mainwaring, P; Perez-Carrión, R; Sobrero, A; Young, S, 2009
)
"To compare the therapeutic effect and toxicity of chemotherapy, used alone or in combined with Shenqi Fuzheng Injection (SFI), for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACRC)."( [Effect of Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with chemotherapy in treating advanced colorectal carcinoma].
Liang, QL; Pan, DC; Xie, JR, 2009
)
"One hundred and fifty-two patients with ACRC were equally randomized by digital table, to the treated group, treated by chemotherapy of FOLFOX regimen combined with SFI, and the control group treated by FOLFOX regimen alone."( [Effect of Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with chemotherapy in treating advanced colorectal carcinoma].
Liang, QL; Pan, DC; Xie, JR, 2009
)
"To investigate the efficiency, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of epirubicin combined with DDP and 5-Fu (PELF regimen) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( [Epirubicin combined with DDP and 5-Fu for treatment of advanced gastric cancer].
Li, J; Li, Y; Lu, M; Shen, L; Zhang, XD, 2009
)
"The regimen of epirubicin combined with DDP and 5-Fu is effective, well tolerable and safe for advanced gastric cancer patients either as adjuvant or as palliative therapy."( [Epirubicin combined with DDP and 5-Fu for treatment of advanced gastric cancer].
Li, J; Li, Y; Lu, M; Shen, L; Zhang, XD, 2009
)
"Third-generation regimens (MACOP-B [methotrexate/leucovorin (LV)/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/ prednisone/bleomycin] or VACOP-B [etoposide/LV/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone/bleomycin]) in combination with local radiation therapy seem to improve lymphoma-free survival of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL)."( Rituximab combined with MACOP-B or VACOP-B and radiation therapy in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study.
Broccoli, A; Brusamolino, E; Cabras, MG; Chiappella, A; Finolezzi, E; Martelli, M; Rossi, A; Salvi, F; Stefoni, V; Zinzani, PL, 2009
)
"Patients with previously treated solid tumors received axitinib (starting dose 5 mg twice daily) combined with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (1, 2, or 5 mg/kg, cohorts 1-3, respectively), FOLFIRI (cohort 4), or FOLFOX (cohort 5)."( A phase I study of axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors.
Abhyankar, V; Burgess, RE; Chen, Y; Infante, J; Kim, S; Robles, RL; Sharma, S; Tarazi, J; Tortorici, M; Trowbridge, RC, 2010
)
"Axitinib is well tolerated in combination with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or FOLFOX plus 2 mg/kg bevacizumab."( A phase I study of axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors.
Abhyankar, V; Burgess, RE; Chen, Y; Infante, J; Kim, S; Robles, RL; Sharma, S; Tarazi, J; Tortorici, M; Trowbridge, RC, 2010
)
"We conducted a phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of daily or twice daily vorinostat x 3 days when combined with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin every 2 weeks."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of two schedules of vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Diasio, RB; Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Muindi, JR; Wang, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2010
)
"The MTD of vorinostat in combination with sLV5FU2 is 1,700 mg orally once daily x 3 or 600 mg orally twice daily x 3 days every 2 weeks."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of two schedules of vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Diasio, RB; Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Muindi, JR; Wang, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2010
)
"HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and bevacizumab had antitumor activity in patients with advanced cancer and liver metastases, and the current results indicated that this combination warrants further study."( A phase 1 study of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with systemic 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors metastatic to the liver.
Bedikian, AY; Camacho, LH; Eng, C; Fu, S; Hong, D; Kurzrock, R; Lim, JA; Ng, C; Tsimberidou, AM; Wallace, M; Wen, S; Wheler, J, 2010
)
"Edotecarin (J-107088), a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase I has an additive effect on colon cell lines (HCT-116) when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)."( A phase I dose-escalation study of edotecarin (J-107088) combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.
Diasio, RB; Douillard, JY; Saif, MW; Sellers, S, 2010
)
" His diagnosis was rectal perforation combined with intraperitoneal abscess."( [A case of rectal cancer combined with intraperitoneal abscess responding completely to uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) therapy].
Hamaya, M; Hojyo, K; Honda, A; Kaneko, H; Kawashima, H; Narabashi, K; Noda, S; Okamoto, N; Onoda, K; Yamada, K; Yokote, K, 2010
)
"Seventy-eight patients with cTNM stage III or IV (M0) gastric cancer were enrolled and 39 were randomized into the treatment arm (n=39, paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX4 regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy every two weeks in each cycle) and control group (n=39)."( [A clinical study of paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX4 regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].
Liu, FR; Ma, FY; Ma, SQ; Qu, JJ; Shi, YR, 2010
)
"The efficacy of paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX4 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is high."( [A clinical study of paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX4 regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].
Liu, FR; Ma, FY; Ma, SQ; Qu, JJ; Shi, YR, 2010
)
"Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is shown to have similar efficacy to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when used both alone and in combination with oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Differences in efficacy and safety between capecitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil when combined with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aliberti, C; Chiriatti, A; Fiorentini, G; Licitra, S; Montagnani, F, 2010
)
" Hazard ratios for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion."( Differences in efficacy and safety between capecitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil when combined with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aliberti, C; Chiriatti, A; Fiorentini, G; Licitra, S; Montagnani, F, 2010
)
"To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a short intensive Uracil/Tegafur (UFT) based chemoradiotherapy scheme combined with celecoxib in locally advanced pancreatic cancer."( Phase II trial of Uracil/Tegafur plus leucovorin and celecoxib combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Busch, OR; Morak, MJ; Nuyttens, JJ; Padmos, EE; Richel, DJ; Schaake, EE; van der Gaast, A; van Eijck, CH; van Tienhoven, G; Vervenne, WL, 2011
)
"5 Gy radiotherapy combined with UFT 300 mg/m(2) per day, leucovorin (folinic acid) 30 mg and celecoxib 80 0mg for 28 days concomitant with radiotherapy."( Phase II trial of Uracil/Tegafur plus leucovorin and celecoxib combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Busch, OR; Morak, MJ; Nuyttens, JJ; Padmos, EE; Richel, DJ; Schaake, EE; van der Gaast, A; van Eijck, CH; van Tienhoven, G; Vervenne, WL, 2011
)
"Based on the lack of response, the substantial toxicity of mainly gastro-intestinal origin and the reported mediocre overall and progression free survival, we cannot advise our short intensive chemoradiotherapy schedule combined with celecoxib as the standard treatment."( Phase II trial of Uracil/Tegafur plus leucovorin and celecoxib combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Busch, OR; Morak, MJ; Nuyttens, JJ; Padmos, EE; Richel, DJ; Schaake, EE; van der Gaast, A; van Eijck, CH; van Tienhoven, G; Vervenne, WL, 2011
)
" We conducted this study to investigate its efficacy and safety when combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
"5 mg/m2 /day as an intravenous infusion for more than 7 days, in combination with chemotherapy."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
"Our study revealed that toxicity of Endostar combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of solid tumors was tolerable with moderate efficacy."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
"To compare clinical efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with those of oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
"Literature search was performed by keywords "irinotecan", "oxaliplatin" and "colorectal cancer" on all randomized controlled trails reported on irinotecan versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer in MEDLINE, OVID, Springer, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) and CBMdisc (Chinese Biology and Medicine disc) before January 2010."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
"Both irinotecan and oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin were effective in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
"Interstitial lung disease in patients with colorectal cancer during chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is rare."( Interstitial lung disease during chemotherapy combined with oxaliplatin and/or bevacizumab in advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Furushima, K; Ishihara, T; Katou, Y; Tanai, C; Tanaka, Y; Usui, K, 2011
)
"0 mg/kg q2w, concomitantly with a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) and FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV), respectively, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( A multicenter, randomized, open-label study to assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab given with either XELOX or FOLFOX-4 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Abt, M; Burns, I; Chen, E; Goldstein, D; Major, P; McKendrick, J; Rittweger, K; Robinson, B; Zhi, J, 2011
)
" BV in combination with XELOX and FOLFOX-4 was generally well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals and no deaths."( A multicenter, randomized, open-label study to assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab given with either XELOX or FOLFOX-4 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Abt, M; Burns, I; Chen, E; Goldstein, D; Major, P; McKendrick, J; Rittweger, K; Robinson, B; Zhi, J, 2011
)
"The MTD of sunitinib combined with FOLFIRI in chemotherapy-naive mCRC was 37."( A phase I study of sunitinib in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aranda, E; Carrato, A; Chau, I; Countouriotis, AM; Cunningham, D; Guillen-Ponce, C; Iveson, TJ; Ramos, FJ; Ruiz-Garcia, A; Saunders, MP; Starling, N; Tabernero, J; Tursi, JM; Vázquez-Mazón, F; Wei, G, 2012
)
" Treatment regimen: irinotecan (80 mg/m²) as 1-h infusion followed by 5-FU (2000 mg/m²) combined with FA (500 mg/m²) as 24-h infusion (d1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, qd 57)."( Palliative first-line therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid as a 24-hour infusion (AIO regimen) combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction followed b
Albrecht, H; Boxberger, F; Busse, D; Golcher, H; Hahn, EG; Hohenberger, W; Janka, R; Konturek, PC; Koucky, K; Männlein, G; Neurath, MF; Ostermeier, N; Reulbach, U; Schildberg, C; Siebler, J; Wein, A; Wolff, K, 2011
)
"This Phase I study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of cediranib (20 or 30 mg) in combination with mFOLFOX6 in Japanese patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC."( Phase I results from a two-part Phase I/II study of cediranib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boku, N; Mishima, H; Okamoto, W; Satoh, T; Shi, X; Shimamura, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K, 2012
)
"Cediranib (20 or 30 mg) in combination with mFOLFOX6 was considered tolerable according to the protocol-defined criteria, providing justification for the Phase II part of this study."( Phase I results from a two-part Phase I/II study of cediranib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boku, N; Mishima, H; Okamoto, W; Satoh, T; Shi, X; Shimamura, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K, 2012
)
"To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mitomycin-C (MMC) in combination with fluoropyrimidines as salvage 3rd -or 4th-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients."( Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Isikdogan, A; Kaplan, MA; Koca, D; Ozdemir, NY; Sevinc, A; Uncu, D; Unek, T; Yetisyigit, T; Yilmaz, U,
)
"MMC in combination with fluoropyrimidines is safe and active in heavily-pretreated MCRC patients."( Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Isikdogan, A; Kaplan, MA; Koca, D; Ozdemir, NY; Sevinc, A; Uncu, D; Unek, T; Yetisyigit, T; Yilmaz, U,
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of yiqi zhuyu decoction (YZD) combined with oxaliplatin plus 5-flurouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX-4) in the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC)."( Yiqi zhuyu decoction combined with FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cao, B; Deng, WL; Li, ST; Li, Z, 2011
)
"YZD combined with FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy significantly improved OS in this first-line trial in the patients with MCRC and significantly decreased grade 3/4 AEs."( Yiqi zhuyu decoction combined with FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cao, B; Deng, WL; Li, ST; Li, Z, 2011
)
"In this phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 172 patients with metastatic CRC were randomised to receive once-daily cediranib (20 or 30 mg) or placebo, each combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6)."( Cediranib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the randomised phase II part of a phase I/II study.
Amagai, K; Baba, H; Bando, H; Denda, T; Fukase, K; Hazama, S; Kato, T; Mishima, H; Muro, K; Shi, X; Skamoto, J; Yamaguchi, K, 2012
)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of trsatuzumab (Herceptin) combined with FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV) in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer."( [Efficacy of trsatuzumab (Herceptin) combined with FOLFIRI regimen in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer].
Chen, QQ; Gao, XP; Li, W; Pan, SY; Sun, J, 2011
)
"Trsatuzumab combined with FOLFIRI regimen is effective, safe and well tolerated for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer."( [Efficacy of trsatuzumab (Herceptin) combined with FOLFIRI regimen in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer].
Chen, QQ; Gao, XP; Li, W; Pan, SY; Sun, J, 2011
)
"We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel (FLTAX) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients."( Phase II study of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.
Hamaguchi, T; Iwasa, S; Kato, K; Kobayashi, K; Matsubara, J; Nagai, Y; Nakajima, TE; Nakayama, N; Shimada, Y; Takagi, S; Tsuji, A; Yamada, Y; Yoshioka, A, 2011
)
"The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as the second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully clarified, although bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the second-line setting has demonstrated a survival benefit."( Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens: a multicenter observational cohort study (TCTG 2nd-BV stud
Baba, E; Bando, H; Boku, N; Esaki, T; Fukunaga, M; Hyodo, I; Kato, S; Katsumata, K; Miyake, Y; Moriwaki, T; Ozeki, M; Satoh, T; Takashima, A; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, S, 2012
)
"This dose escalation, uncontrolled phase I study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of oral sorafenib 100, 200, or 400 mg twice daily (bid, continuous regimen) in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LCV, intravenous infusion or bolus) in patients with advanced, solid tumors."( Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced solid tumors.
Atsmon, J; Brendel, E; Bulocinic, S; Figer, A; Geva, R; Nalbandyan, K; Shacham-Shmueli, E; Shpigel, S, 2012
)
"To observe the efficacy, side effects and impact on the quality of life of Aidi Injection combined with leucovorin calcium/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4 regimen) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients."( A clinical study on safety and efficacy of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy.
Huang, XE; Li, CG; Li, Y; Tang, JH; Xu, HX, 2011
)
"Aidi injection combined with FOLFOX4 is associated with reduced toxicity of chemotherapy, enhanced clinical benefit response and improved quality of life of patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( A clinical study on safety and efficacy of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy.
Huang, XE; Li, CG; Li, Y; Tang, JH; Xu, HX, 2011
)
"The overall toxicity of oxaliplatin and continuous 5-FU/leucovorin infusion in combination with radiation was well tolerated."( Neoadjuvant treatment of mid-to-lower rectal cancer with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in combination with radiotherapy: a Korean single center phase II study.
Baek, JH; Jung, DH; Kwon, KA; Lee, KC; Lee, SH; Lee, WS; Shin, DB; Sym, SJ, 2013
)
"Leucovorin Sodium (LV/Na) has a high solubility, and is stable when given with continuous infusion of 5-FU."( A phase II randomized study of combined infusional leucovorin sodium and 5- FU versus the leucovorin calcium followed by 5-FU both in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bleiberg, H; D'Haens, G; Deleu, I; Efira, A; Humblet, Y; Paesmans, M; Peeters, M; Rezaei Kalantari, H; Vandebroek, A; Vergauwe, P, 2012
)
"Fifty seven patients with mCRC and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to receive LV/Na or LV/Ca with irinotecan or oxaliplatine combined with infusional 5-FU."( A phase II randomized study of combined infusional leucovorin sodium and 5- FU versus the leucovorin calcium followed by 5-FU both in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bleiberg, H; D'Haens, G; Deleu, I; Efira, A; Humblet, Y; Paesmans, M; Peeters, M; Rezaei Kalantari, H; Vandebroek, A; Vergauwe, P, 2012
)
"This phase I study assessed the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6)."( A phase I study of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Camidge, DR; Chan, E; Chow Maneval, E; Diab, S; Eckhardt, SG; Khosravan, R; Leong, S; Lin, X; Lockhart, AC; Messersmith, WA; Spratlin, J, 2012
)
" No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were apparent between sunitinib, its metabolite SU12662, and mFOLFOX6."( A phase I study of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Camidge, DR; Chan, E; Chow Maneval, E; Diab, S; Eckhardt, SG; Khosravan, R; Leong, S; Lin, X; Lockhart, AC; Messersmith, WA; Spratlin, J, 2012
)
"Sunitinib combined with mFOLFOX6 had acceptable tolerability."( A phase I study of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Camidge, DR; Chan, E; Chow Maneval, E; Diab, S; Eckhardt, SG; Khosravan, R; Leong, S; Lin, X; Lockhart, AC; Messersmith, WA; Spratlin, J, 2012
)
"The efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab every 2 or 4 weeks using the same dosage in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI were retrospectively evaluated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in the first-line and second-line therapy."( Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Buyukberber, S; Ciltas, A; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Dikilitas, M; Dogu, GG; Durnali, AG; Kaplan, MA; Karaca, H; Ozkan, M; Sevinc, A; Yetisyigit, T; Yildiz, R, 2012
)
" The patients had received biweekly FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks schedule for various reasons in individual patients."( Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Buyukberber, S; Ciltas, A; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Dikilitas, M; Dogu, GG; Durnali, AG; Kaplan, MA; Karaca, H; Ozkan, M; Sevinc, A; Yetisyigit, T; Yildiz, R, 2012
)
"Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI had similar efficacy and tolerability in mCRC."( Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Buyukberber, S; Ciltas, A; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Dikilitas, M; Dogu, GG; Durnali, AG; Kaplan, MA; Karaca, H; Ozkan, M; Sevinc, A; Yetisyigit, T; Yildiz, R, 2012
)
"To evaluate the safety and tolerability of two different weekly doses of the fully humanized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting monoclonal antibody matuzumab combined with high-dose 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (PLF) in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-positive advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas."( Phase I study of matuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (PLF) in patients with advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.
Heeger, S; Lüpfert, C; Przyborek, M; Schleucher, N; Trarbach, T; Vanhoefer, U, 2013
)
"Patients were treated in two matuzumab dose groups with the first cohort of patients receiving 400 mg matuzumab in combination with PLF."( Phase I study of matuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (PLF) in patients with advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.
Heeger, S; Lüpfert, C; Przyborek, M; Schleucher, N; Trarbach, T; Vanhoefer, U, 2013
)
"Matuzumab, in combination with PLF, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with modest anti-tumor activity."( Phase I study of matuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (PLF) in patients with advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.
Heeger, S; Lüpfert, C; Przyborek, M; Schleucher, N; Trarbach, T; Vanhoefer, U, 2013
)
" FOLFOX4 combined with panitumumab therapy was initiated 1 month after the operation."( [A case report of advanced mucinous adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon with peritoneal dissemination effectively treated by multidisciplinary approach with a focus on FOLFOX4 therapy combined with panitumumab].
Asano, T; Hattori, M; Kamiya, I; Negita, M; Takagi, D; Uemura, T, 2012
)
" This study compared the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) combined with RFA versus HR alone after effective chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable CRLM."( Hepatic resection combined with radiofrequency ablation for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases after effective chemotherapy is a safe procedure with a low incidence of local recurrence.
Baba, H; Beppu, T; Chikamoto, A; Hayashi, H; Kikuchi, K; Kuroki, H; Mima, K; Miyamoto, Y; Nakagawa, S; Okabe, H; Sakamoto, Y; Watanabe, M, 2013
)
" Recently, fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) demonstrated their superiority in first-line therapy."( Influcence of localization of primary tumor on effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.
Chauffert, B; Gentil, J; Ghiringhelli, F; Lorgis, V, 2012
)
"The maximum planned dose of oxaliplatin at 100 mg/m(2) per dose in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin was safe and well tolerated and in this patient population."( A multi-center phase Ib study of oxaliplatin (NSC#266046) in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.
Arceci, RJ; Bagatell, R; Boklan, J; Christians, U; Duncan, T; Gore, L; Herzog, C; Hunger, SP; Ivy, SP; Macy, ME; Narendren, A; Rolla, K; Trippett, T; Whitlock, J, 2013
)
" In the USA, the approval of cetuximab has been recently expanded to include the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS mutation-negative (wild-type), EGFR-expressing, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when used in combination with FOLFIRI (irinotecan, fluorouracil, leucovorin [folinic acid])."( Cetuximab: a guide to its use in combination with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in the USA.
Lyseng-Williamson, KA, 2012
)
"In this multicenter phase Ib study, drozitumab was given in combination with the mFOLFOX6 regimen and bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer on day 1 of every 14-day cycle."( Phase Ib study of drozitumab combined with first-line mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Amler, LC; Baranda, JC; Bayraktar, S; Flores, AM; MacIntyre, J; Montero, A; Portera, C; Raja, R; Rocha Lima, CM; Royer-Joo, S; Stern, H; Wallmark, J, 2012
)
" This phase I study aimed to assess the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of imatinib in combination with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and to identify pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and toxicities."( A phase I trial of imatinib in combination with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Copeman, M; Gibbs, P; Gouillou, M; Jefford, M; Lipton, L; Lynch, K; McArthur, G; Michael, M; Tebbutt, NC; Zalcberg, J, 2013
)
"This prospective observational study assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as preoperative treatment to downsize tumours for radical resection in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Preoperative treatment with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Albiol, M; Alsina, M; Codina-Barreras, A; Figueras, J; Guardeño, R; Hernandez-Yagüe, X; Lopez-Ben, S; Queralt, B; Soriano, J, 2013
)
" Preoperative treatment consisted of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) combined with oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy, which was followed by surgery in patients showing clinical benefit."( Preoperative treatment with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Albiol, M; Alsina, M; Codina-Barreras, A; Figueras, J; Guardeño, R; Hernandez-Yagüe, X; Lopez-Ben, S; Queralt, B; Soriano, J, 2013
)
"The aims of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed doses of gemcitabine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (G-FLIE) in solid tumors, including advanced pancreatic cancer, and to evaluate the toxicity of the regimen."( Phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (G-FLIE) in patients with metastatic solid tumors including adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Chalasani, SB; Chung, MS; Grossbard, ML; Kozuch, PS; Malamud, S; Mirzoyev, T; Olszewski, AJ, 2013
)
" However, the value of FAK combined with JWA for GC patients as a biomarker has not been studied."( High FAK combined with low JWA expression: clinical prognostic and predictive role for adjuvant fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin treatment in resectable gastric cancer patients.
Chen, Y; He, S; Li, A; Qiang, F; Røe, OD; Tan, Y; Wang, S; Wu, X; Xia, X; Zhang, J; Zhou, J; Zhou, Y, 2013
)
"Pazopanib combined with FOLFOX6 or reduced CapeOx was adequately tolerated in this patient population."( An open-label study of the safety and tolerability of pazopanib in combination with FOLFOX6 or CapeOx in patients with colorectal cancer.
Adams, LM; Botbyl, J; Brady, J; Chau, I; Corrie, P; Digumarti, R; Laubscher, KH; Mallath, M; Midgley, RS, 2013
)
" The multitargeted kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, was combined with chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatment of mCRC to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (primary objectives) and tumor response (secondary objective)."( Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study.
Boix, O; Ehrenberg, R; Fischer, R; Folprecht, G; Hacker, UT; Hamann, S; Köhne, CH; Kornacker, M; Krauss, J; Kuhlmann, J; Lettieri, J; Mross, KB; Schultheis, B; Strumberg, D, 2013
)
"Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability in combination with chemotherapy, with increased exposure of irinotecan and SN-38 but no significant effect on 5-fluorouracil or oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics."( Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study.
Boix, O; Ehrenberg, R; Fischer, R; Folprecht, G; Hacker, UT; Hamann, S; Köhne, CH; Kornacker, M; Krauss, J; Kuhlmann, J; Lettieri, J; Mross, KB; Schultheis, B; Strumberg, D, 2013
)
" We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conatumumab (an agonistic monoclonal antibody against human death receptor 5) and ganitumab (a monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor) combined with standard FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with mutant KRAS mCRC."( A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Choo, SP; Chuah, BYS; Cohn, AL; Cottrell, S; Dubey, S; Galimi, F; Hei, YJ; Kopp, MV; Loberg, R; Maurel, J; McCaffery, I; Mitchell, EP; Nowara, E; Pan, Y; Sakaeva, DD; Sastre, J; Suzuki, S; Tabernero, J, 2013
)
") or placebo, combined with mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2); levo-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2); fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus and 2400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion) every 14 days."( Sorafenib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX6) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the RESPECT trial.
Bulavina, I; Burdaeva, O; Cassidy, J; Chang, YL; Cheporov, S; Davidenko, I; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Gladkov, O; Köhne, CH; Lokker, NA; O'Dwyer, PJ; Potter, V; Rivera, F; Salazar, R; Samuel, L; Sobrero, A; Tabernero, J; Tejpar, S; Van Cutsem, E; Vladimirova, L, 2013
)
" These results do not support further development of sorafenib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in molecularly unselected patients with mCRC."( Sorafenib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX6) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the RESPECT trial.
Bulavina, I; Burdaeva, O; Cassidy, J; Chang, YL; Cheporov, S; Davidenko, I; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Gladkov, O; Köhne, CH; Lokker, NA; O'Dwyer, PJ; Potter, V; Rivera, F; Salazar, R; Samuel, L; Sobrero, A; Tabernero, J; Tejpar, S; Van Cutsem, E; Vladimirova, L, 2013
)
" Patients with histologically proven gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma who were treated with irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in a first-line setting were eligible for analysis."( First-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for high-grade metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Du, Z; Li, Q; Wang, Y; Wen, F; Zhou, Y,
)
"The results demonstrated that irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity for patients with metastatic high-grade gastointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma that merits further investigation in prospective trials."( First-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for high-grade metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Du, Z; Li, Q; Wang, Y; Wen, F; Zhou, Y,
)
"The purpose of this study is to observe and compare the preliminary efficacy and side effects of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy in combination with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( Clinical study of cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy in combination with docetaxel, 5-flourouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced-stage gastric carcinoma.
Kan, W; Ke, Z; Pengjun, Z; Qinghua, D; Ruzhen, Z; Shenglin, M; Xiadong, L; Zhibing, W,
)
"Retrospectively analyzed 101 patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin intravenous chemotherapy or intravenous administration of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy, 49 patients in intravenous chemotherapy (VC) group, 52 patients in hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) group."( Clinical study of cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy in combination with docetaxel, 5-flourouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced-stage gastric carcinoma.
Kan, W; Ke, Z; Pengjun, Z; Qinghua, D; Ruzhen, Z; Shenglin, M; Xiadong, L; Zhibing, W,
)
" We present the treatment rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized multicenter placebo-controlled phase II study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MetMAb combined with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX-6 (5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin)."( Treatment rationale and study design for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study evaluating onartuzumab (MetMAb) in combination with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bendell, JC; Ervin, TJ; Gallinson, D; Hack, SP; Phan, SC; Saleh, MN; Singh, J; Vallone, M; Wallace, JA, 2013
)
"Eligible patients with previously untreated mCRC are randomized 1:1 to either mFOLFOX-6 combined with bevacizumab and placebo followed by 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab and placebo or mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab plus MetMAb followed by 5 FU/LV, bevacizumab, and MetMAb."( Treatment rationale and study design for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study evaluating onartuzumab (MetMAb) in combination with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bendell, JC; Ervin, TJ; Gallinson, D; Hack, SP; Phan, SC; Saleh, MN; Singh, J; Vallone, M; Wallace, JA, 2013
)
"The study objectives were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic colorectal cancer."( A phase 1B study of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ashkenazi, A; Kapp, AV; Kozloff, MF; Messersmith, WA; Peddi, PF; Portera, CC; Royer-Joo, S; Wainberg, ZA, 2013
)
"The antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (ziv-aflibercept in the United States) in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved survival in a phase III study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen."( Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial.
Allegra, CJ; Chevalier, S; Ferry, DR; Lakomý, R; McKendrick, JJ; Moiseyenko, VM; Prausová, J; Ruff, P; Soussan-Lazard, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, GA, 2014
)
"The benefits of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin were maintained across the specified patient subgroups, including in patients with or without prior bevacizumab treatment."( Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial.
Allegra, CJ; Chevalier, S; Ferry, DR; Lakomý, R; McKendrick, JJ; Moiseyenko, VM; Prausová, J; Ruff, P; Soussan-Lazard, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, GA, 2014
)
" Here, we evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of efatutazone combined with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, levo-leucovorin, and irinotecan) as second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with mCRC."( Phase 1 study of efatutazone, a novel oral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, in combination with FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hyodo, I; Komatsu, Y; Machida, N; Ohtsu, A; Onuma, H; Sasaki, T; Yachi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Yuki, S, 2014
)
"50 mg (the recommended dose [RD] of efatutazone monotherapy) twice daily in combination with FOLFIRI in a 3-9 patient cohort."( Phase 1 study of efatutazone, a novel oral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, in combination with FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hyodo, I; Komatsu, Y; Machida, N; Ohtsu, A; Onuma, H; Sasaki, T; Yachi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Yuki, S, 2014
)
"Efatutazone combined with FOLFIRI demonstrates an acceptable safety profile and evidence of disease stabilization in Japanese patients with mCRC."( Phase 1 study of efatutazone, a novel oral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, in combination with FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hyodo, I; Komatsu, Y; Machida, N; Ohtsu, A; Onuma, H; Sasaki, T; Yachi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Yuki, S, 2014
)
" Seven electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of FOLFOX4 combined with HMs compared to FOLFOX4 alone."( FOLFOX 4 combined with herbal medicine for advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Chen, M; May, BH; Xue, CC; Zhang, AL; Zhou, IW, 2014
)
", in a week-on/week-off schedule, combined with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX."( Intermittent dosing of axitinib combined with chemotherapy is supported by (18)FLT-PET in gastrointestinal tumours.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Hoh, CK; Infante, JR; Kim, S; Reid, TR; Rosbrook, B; Tarazi, J, 2014
)
"Axitinib administered in a week-on/week-off schedule combined with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX is supported by (18)FLT-PET data and was well tolerated in patients with gastrointestinal tumours."( Intermittent dosing of axitinib combined with chemotherapy is supported by (18)FLT-PET in gastrointestinal tumours.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Hoh, CK; Infante, JR; Kim, S; Reid, TR; Rosbrook, B; Tarazi, J, 2014
)
"This phase I study investigated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, and efficacy in three cohorts all treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus that was delivered (1) in combination with 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin (5-FU/LV), (2) with mFOLFOX6 (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin), and (3) with mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab in patients with refractory solid tumors."( A phase I trial of everolimus in combination with 5-FU/LV, mFOLFOX6 and mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Bernard, S; Davies, JM; Dees, EC; Goldberg, RM; Ivanova, A; Keller, K; McRee, AJ; O'Neil, BH; Sanoff, HG, 2014
)
" In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of treatment with systemic gemcitabine (GEM) combined with HAIC with cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and isovorin in patients with advanced ICC."( Systemic gemcitabine combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and isovorin for the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study.
Harima, Y; Hidaka, I; Ishikawa, T; Marumoto, M; Marumoto, Y; Saeki, I; Sakaida, I; Segawa, M; Takami, T; Terai, S; Uchida, K; Urata, Y; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamasaki, T,
)
"Seven patients with advanced ICC, who received systemic GEM combined with HAIC with CDDP, 5-FU, and isovorin were studied."( Systemic gemcitabine combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and isovorin for the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study.
Harima, Y; Hidaka, I; Ishikawa, T; Marumoto, M; Marumoto, Y; Saeki, I; Sakaida, I; Segawa, M; Takami, T; Terai, S; Uchida, K; Urata, Y; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamasaki, T,
)
"Although this is a pilot study, we suggest that systemic GEM combined with HAIC with CDDP, 5-FU, and isovorin, may be a useful therapy for patients with advanced ICC."( Systemic gemcitabine combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and isovorin for the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study.
Harima, Y; Hidaka, I; Ishikawa, T; Marumoto, M; Marumoto, Y; Saeki, I; Sakaida, I; Segawa, M; Takami, T; Terai, S; Uchida, K; Urata, Y; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamasaki, T,
)
"To estimate the incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI as second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients previously treated with oxaliplatin."( [Cost-effectiveness analysis of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].
Abad, A; Echave, M; Frías, C; Giménez, E; Joulain, F; Lamas, MJ; Naoshy, S; Oyagüez, I; Pericay, C; Rubio, M, 2014
)
" In the cost-effectiveness analysis Euros 38,931/LYG was obtained with aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI."( [Cost-effectiveness analysis of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].
Abad, A; Echave, M; Frías, C; Giménez, E; Joulain, F; Lamas, MJ; Naoshy, S; Oyagüez, I; Pericay, C; Rubio, M, 2014
)
"Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI increased overall survival versus FOLFIRI, so it is an effective strategy in the treatment of patients with mCRC."( [Cost-effectiveness analysis of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].
Abad, A; Echave, M; Frías, C; Giménez, E; Joulain, F; Lamas, MJ; Naoshy, S; Oyagüez, I; Pericay, C; Rubio, M, 2014
)
"The aim of this retrospectively study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Aidi injection (ADI) combined with FOLFOX4 chemothreapy regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma."( Aidi injection combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Li, Y; Nan, H; Wang, T; Wang, Y; Zhang, C; Zhang, X, 2014
)
" Of the included 121 cases, 58 subjects received the treatment of ADI combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy (experiment group) and the other 63 cases received the FOLFOX4 chemotherapy alone (control group)."( Aidi injection combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Li, Y; Nan, H; Wang, T; Wang, Y; Zhang, C; Zhang, X, 2014
)
"ADI combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy can improve the quality of life and decrease some of the toxicity related to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Aidi injection combined with FOLFOX4 chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Li, Y; Nan, H; Wang, T; Wang, Y; Zhang, C; Zhang, X, 2014
)
"In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 as monotherapy or in combination with leucovorin as the second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer whose disease had progressed on gemcitabine treatment."( S-1 as monotherapy or in combination with leucovorin as second-line treatment in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study.
Ba, Y; Bai, Y; Ge, F; Jia, R; Li, F; Lin, L; Wang, Y; Xu, H; Xu, J; Xu, N; Zhang, Y, 2014
)
" Patients randomly received S-1 or S-1 in combination with leucovorin (SL arm) in 21-day cycles."( S-1 as monotherapy or in combination with leucovorin as second-line treatment in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study.
Ba, Y; Bai, Y; Ge, F; Jia, R; Li, F; Lin, L; Wang, Y; Xu, H; Xu, J; Xu, N; Zhang, Y, 2014
)
"This phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) as first-line treatment of metastatic wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer."( Biweekly cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of a phase II, open-label, clinical trial (OPTIMIX-ACROSS Study).
Alonso, V; Cirera, L; Fernandez-Plana, J; Mendez, M; Pericay, C; Quintero, G; Saigi, E; Salgado, M; Salud, A, 2014
)
" This study aimed to evaluate the drug safety and tolerability of continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) of endostar in combination with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as an initial therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients."( Endostar in combination with modified FOLFOX6 as an initial therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a phase I clinical trial.
Cao, J; Chen, Z; Guo, W; Ji, D; Li, J; Li, W; Lv, F; Qiu, L; Wang, J; Xia, Z; Zhang, S; Zhang, W, 2015
)
" Primary outcomes were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CIV endostar in combination with mFOLFOX6."( Endostar in combination with modified FOLFOX6 as an initial therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a phase I clinical trial.
Cao, J; Chen, Z; Guo, W; Ji, D; Li, J; Li, W; Lv, F; Qiu, L; Wang, J; Xia, Z; Zhang, S; Zhang, W, 2015
)
"Endostar in combination with mFOLFOX6 was generally safe and well tolerated."( Endostar in combination with modified FOLFOX6 as an initial therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a phase I clinical trial.
Cao, J; Chen, Z; Guo, W; Ji, D; Li, J; Li, W; Lv, F; Qiu, L; Wang, J; Xia, Z; Zhang, S; Zhang, W, 2015
)
"The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of aflibercept (Sanofi) to submit clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence for aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and fluorouracil-based therapy [irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (FOLFIRI)] for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer which has progressed following prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, as part of the Institute's Single Technology Appraisal process."( The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of
Duarte, A; Duffy, S; Rodriguez-Lopez, R; Simmonds, M; Spackman, E; Wade, R; Woolacott, N, 2015
)
" Oxaliplatin in combination with intravenous 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV; modified [m]FOLFOX6) or capecitabine (XELOX) improves tolerability compared with 5-FU/cisplatin regimen."( Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study.
André, T; Bachet, JB; Chibaudel, B; Cohen, R; de Gramont, A; Hentic, O; Louvet, C; Samalin, E; Soularue, É; Tournigand, C; Zaanan, A, 2015
)
" We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with disease progression during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine."( Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blin
Bodoky, G; Chang, SC; Ciuleanu, TE; Clingan, PR; Cohn, AL; Garcia-Alfonso, P; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Grothey, A; Kim, TW; Lonardi, S; Nasroulah, F; Obermannova, R; Portnoy, DC; Prausová, J; Simms, L; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015
)
" Curcumin may provide added benefit in subsets of patients when administered with FOLFOX, and is a well-tolerated chemotherapy adjunct."( Curcumin inhibits cancer stem cell phenotypes in ex vivo models of colorectal liver metastases, and is clinically safe and tolerable in combination with FOLFOX chemotherapy.
Berry, DP; Brown, K; Cai, H; Dennison, A; Garcea, G; Greaves, P; Griffin-Teal, N; Higgins, JA; Howells, LM; Irving, G; Iwuji, C; James, MI; Karmokar, A; Lloyd, DM; Metcalfe, M; Morgan, B; Patel, SR; Steward, WP; Thomas, A, 2015
)
"To explore the clinical efficacy and toxic and side effects of recombinant human endostatin (rh- endostatin/endostar) combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( Clinical observation on recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.
Gao, SR; Li, LM; Wang, AR; Wang, GM; Xia, HP; Xu, HY, 2015
)
"Preliminary observations show that endostar (once every other day) combined with chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer, with low toxic effects, good tolerance, deserving further study."( Clinical observation on recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.
Gao, SR; Li, LM; Wang, AR; Wang, GM; Xia, HP; Xu, HY, 2015
)
" This novel siRNA based drug was studied, in combination with chemotherapy, as targeted therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)."( RNAi therapy targeting KRAS in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.
Dancour, A; David, EB; Domb, A; Eliakim, R; Gabai, RM; Galun, E; Golan, T; Goldes, Y; Goldin, E; Harari, G; Hen, N; Hubert, A; Khvalevsky, EZ; Kopleman, Y; Lahav, M; Raskin, S; Segal, A; Shemi, A, 2015
)
" In this study, we compared the survival outcomes of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with either modified 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (mFOL- FOX6) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX)."( Comparison of first-line bevacizumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Akyol, M; Alacacioglu, A; Cokmert, S; Demir, L; Dirican, A; Kucukzeybek, Y; Oktay Tarhan, M; Varol, U; Vedat Bayoglu, I; Yildiz, I; Yildiz, Y,
)
"Our results show that XELOX is a safe and effective alternative to mFOLFOX6 when combined with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for mCRC patients."( Comparison of first-line bevacizumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Akyol, M; Alacacioglu, A; Cokmert, S; Demir, L; Dirican, A; Kucukzeybek, Y; Oktay Tarhan, M; Varol, U; Vedat Bayoglu, I; Yildiz, I; Yildiz, Y,
)
"Aiming at exploring clinical curative effect of oxaliplatin combined with flurouracil in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumor, this study divided 60 patients with gastrointestinal tumor into control and observation groups, each containing 30 patients."( Clinical curative effect of oxaliplatin combined with flurouracil in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumor.
Feng, W; Li, B; Liu, Y; Wang, J; Xu, D; Zhuang, J, 2015
)
" The remission rate, control rate and time to disease progression were compared among patients receiving cetuximab combined with different chemotherapy regimens in different periods."( [Clinical efficacy observation of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Bai, L; Han, C; Jiao, S; Li, J; Su, D; Wang, Y; Zhang, T, 2015
)
"Cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended as the first-line application in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients, because it is helpful to improve the rate of disease control."( [Clinical efficacy observation of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Bai, L; Han, C; Jiao, S; Li, J; Su, D; Wang, Y; Zhang, T, 2015
)
"The aim is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and side effects of paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy in combination with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients of locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) at high risk for recurrence after curative resection."( Effect of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Chen, S; Deng, Q; Jing, S; Li, J; Li, X; Ma, S; Tang, R; Wu, K; Wu, Z; Zheng, Z, 2014
)
"Cisplatin HIPEC combined with paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy regimen could improve the survival rate and decrease the postoperative recurrence of locally advanced GC."( Effect of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Chen, S; Deng, Q; Jing, S; Li, J; Li, X; Ma, S; Tang, R; Wu, K; Wu, Z; Zheng, Z, 2014
)
"Bevacizumab combined with modified FOLFOX6 is a standard regimen for colorectal cancer."( Bevacizumab in Combination with Modified FOLFOX6 in Heavily Pretreated Patients with HER2/Neu-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial.
Cao, J; Hu, X; Li, T; Lv, F; Ni, C; Ragaz, J; Sun, S; Wang, B; Wang, L; Wang, Z; Wu, Z; Xie, J; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2015
)
"5 mg/kg every three weeks, was administered with modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 46 hours every 2 weeks) to patients who failed at least 1 chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting."( Bevacizumab in Combination with Modified FOLFOX6 in Heavily Pretreated Patients with HER2/Neu-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial.
Cao, J; Hu, X; Li, T; Lv, F; Ni, C; Ragaz, J; Sun, S; Wang, B; Wang, L; Wang, Z; Wu, Z; Xie, J; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2015
)
" Preclinical evidence suggests that the scheduling of bevacizumab may be crucial to optimize its combination with chemo-radiotherapy."( Critical role of bevacizumab scheduling in combination with pre-surgical chemo-radiotherapy in MRI-defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the BRANCH trial.
Aloj, L; Avallone, A; Bianco, F; Botti, G; Budillon, A; Caracò, C; Comella, P; Delrio, P; Granata, V; Iaffaioli, VR; Leone, A; Marone, P; Muto, P; Pecori, B; Petrillo, A; Romano, C; Romano, G; Tatangelo, F, 2015
)
"These results highlights the relevance of bevacizumab scheduling to optimize its combination with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy in the management of LARC."( Critical role of bevacizumab scheduling in combination with pre-surgical chemo-radiotherapy in MRI-defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the BRANCH trial.
Aloj, L; Avallone, A; Bianco, F; Botti, G; Budillon, A; Caracò, C; Comella, P; Delrio, P; Granata, V; Iaffaioli, VR; Leone, A; Marone, P; Muto, P; Pecori, B; Petrillo, A; Romano, C; Romano, G; Tatangelo, F, 2015
)
"Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BKM120 daily combined with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of a 28 day cycle."( A phase I trial of mFOLFOX6 combined with the oral PI3K inhibitor BKM120 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.
Carlson, C; Ivanova, A; McRee, AJ; O'Neil, BH; Sanoff, HK, 2015
)
"The MTD of BKM120 in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 was 40 mg daily, which is well below the 100 mg daily dose proven effective and tolerable both as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutics."( A phase I trial of mFOLFOX6 combined with the oral PI3K inhibitor BKM120 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.
Carlson, C; Ivanova, A; McRee, AJ; O'Neil, BH; Sanoff, HK, 2015
)
" Herein, we critically discuss the current data on the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic CRC and briefly comment on existing controversies and future perspectives."( Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Grapsa, D; Saif, MW; Syrigos, K, 2015
)
" This phase I trial sought to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of bevacizumab and sorafenib combined with standard cytotoxic therapy for advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers."( Phase I trial of FOLFIRI in combination with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.
Borad, MJ; Erlichman, C; Grothey, A; Hubbard, JM; Johnson, E; Kim, G; Lensing, J; Puttabasavaiah, S; Qin, R; Wright, J, 2016
)
"A standard 3 + 3 trial design utilized 3 escalating sorafenib dose levels: (1) 200 mg daily, days 3-7, 10-14; (2) 200 mg twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13; and (3) 200 mg twice daily, days 3-7, 10-14 combined with standard dose FOLFIRI (5-fluouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg), repeated every 14 days."( Phase I trial of FOLFIRI in combination with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.
Borad, MJ; Erlichman, C; Grothey, A; Hubbard, JM; Johnson, E; Kim, G; Lensing, J; Puttabasavaiah, S; Qin, R; Wright, J, 2016
)
" The MTD was determined to be dose level 2: sorafenib 200 mg twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13 combined with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab at standard doses."( Phase I trial of FOLFIRI in combination with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.
Borad, MJ; Erlichman, C; Grothey, A; Hubbard, JM; Johnson, E; Kim, G; Lensing, J; Puttabasavaiah, S; Qin, R; Wright, J, 2016
)
"The MTD of this regimen is sorafenib 200 mg twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13 combined with standard doses of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab."( Phase I trial of FOLFIRI in combination with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.
Borad, MJ; Erlichman, C; Grothey, A; Hubbard, JM; Johnson, E; Kim, G; Lensing, J; Puttabasavaiah, S; Qin, R; Wright, J, 2016
)
"High-dose FOLFIRI combined with cetuximab yielded high response rates and enabled complete resection of class II hepatic metastases in most patients."( High Resectability Rate of Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases After UGT1A1-Adapted High-Dose Irinotecan Combined with LV5FU2 and Cetuximab: A Multicenter Phase II Study (ERBIFORT).
Buc, E; Chatelut, E; De la Fouchardière, C; Mendoza, C; Mineur, L; Pezet, D; Phelip, JM; Quesada, JL; Rivoire, M; Roblin, X, 2016
)
" In the present study, the efficacy and safety of a modified (1-week shorter administration period) UFT/LV schedule combined with bevacizumab for a similar population are reported."( Uracil-Tegafur and Oral Leucovorin Combined With Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 75 Years) With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial (Joint Study of Bevacizumab, Oral Leucovorin, and Uracil-Tegafur in Elderly Patients [J-BLU
Amagai, K; Denda, T; Higashijima, J; Hiroshima, Y; Hyodo, I; Indo, S; Ishida, H; Maeba, T; Masuishi, T; Mizuta, M; Moriwaki, T; Nakajima, G; Negoro, Y; Nishina, T; Ozeki, M; Sakai, Y; Sato, M; Shimada, M; Takahashi, I; Yamamoto, Y, 2016
)
"UFT/LV (3 weeks of therapy and 1 week without) combined with biweekly bevacizumab is a tolerable and effective treatment option for elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Uracil-Tegafur and Oral Leucovorin Combined With Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 75 Years) With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial (Joint Study of Bevacizumab, Oral Leucovorin, and Uracil-Tegafur in Elderly Patients [J-BLU
Amagai, K; Denda, T; Higashijima, J; Hiroshima, Y; Hyodo, I; Indo, S; Ishida, H; Maeba, T; Masuishi, T; Mizuta, M; Moriwaki, T; Nakajima, G; Negoro, Y; Nishina, T; Ozeki, M; Sakai, Y; Sato, M; Shimada, M; Takahashi, I; Yamamoto, Y, 2016
)
" We conducted a phase I study of lenalidomide in combination with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) in patients with advanced cancer."( Phase I clinical trial of lenalidomide in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced cancer.
Falchook, G; Fu, S; Hong, DS; Naing, A; Piha-Paul, S; Said, R; Tsimberidou, AM; Wheler, JJ; Ye, Y, 2016
)
"Lenalidomide in combination with FOLFOX was well tolerated."( Phase I clinical trial of lenalidomide in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced cancer.
Falchook, G; Fu, S; Hong, DS; Naing, A; Piha-Paul, S; Said, R; Tsimberidou, AM; Wheler, JJ; Ye, Y, 2016
)
" We aimed to establish the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 oral dose of the CCR2 inhibitor PF-04136309 in combination with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (oxaliplatin and irinotecan plus leucovorin and fluorouracil)."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
" Patients were allocated to receive either FOLFIRINOX alone (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 180 mg/m(2), leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), and bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), followed by 2400 mg/m(2) 46-h continuous infusion), administered every 2 weeks for a total of six treatment cycles, or in combination with oral PF-04136309, administered at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily in a standard 3 + 3 dose de-escalation design."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
"CCR2-targeted therapy with PF-04136309 in combination with FOLFIRINOX is safe and tolerable."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
" We found that cetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy, fostered ICD in CRC cells, which we measured via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response and an increase in phagocytosis by dendritic cells."( The EGFR-specific antibody cetuximab combined with chemotherapy triggers immunogenic cell death.
Bardelli, A; Bonaldi, T; Cancelliere, C; Conte, A; Cuomo, A; Di Fiore, PP; Magni, E; Penna, G; Pozzi, C; Ravenda, PS; Rescigno, M; Sigismund, S; Silvola, A; Spadoni, I; Zampino, MG, 2016
)
"The aim of this study is to discuss the curative effect of introperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy(IHPC) combined with systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis."( [Study of introperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy combined with systemic neoadjuvent chemotherapy in treatment of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis].
Chen, Y; Guo, Y; Suo, J; Wang, D; Xing, Y; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
"Sixty-four patients received IHPC combined with systemic chemotherapy."( [Study of introperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy combined with systemic neoadjuvent chemotherapy in treatment of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis].
Chen, Y; Guo, Y; Suo, J; Wang, D; Xing, Y; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
"IHPC combined with systemic chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic method for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in terms of reducing preoperative tumor load and achieving radical resection."( [Study of introperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy combined with systemic neoadjuvent chemotherapy in treatment of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis].
Chen, Y; Guo, Y; Suo, J; Wang, D; Xing, Y; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
"Research has indicated that some Chinese herb injections (CHIs) might be beneficial in combination with chemotherapy, including remedies that might be used as effective chemosensitizers and radiosensitizers, or as palliative therapy."( Network meta-analysis of Chinese herb injections combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Ge, L; Mao, L; Shen, XP; Tian, JH; Wang, YF; Yang, KH; Zhang, J; Zhang, JH, 2016
)
" Standard pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different CHIs combined with FOLFOX."( Network meta-analysis of Chinese herb injections combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Ge, L; Mao, L; Shen, XP; Tian, JH; Wang, YF; Yang, KH; Zhang, J; Zhang, JH, 2016
)
" More studies are required to confirm the efficacy of CHIs in combination with FOLFOX for advanced CRC."( Network meta-analysis of Chinese herb injections combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Ge, L; Mao, L; Shen, XP; Tian, JH; Wang, YF; Yang, KH; Zhang, J; Zhang, JH, 2016
)
"The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the potential of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38, when administered with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI)."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
"There was no PK drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
"To analyze the preventive effect of mecobalamin combined with glutathione on neurotoxicity induced by FOLFOX4 chemotherapy."( [Preventive effect of mecobalamin combined with glutathione on neurotoxicity induced by FOLFOX4 chemotherapy].
Li, SD; Li, XJ; Shi, JH, 2016
)
"Mecobalamin combined with glutathione can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity induced by FOLFOX4 chemotherapy, therefore, worthy of clinical application."( [Preventive effect of mecobalamin combined with glutathione on neurotoxicity induced by FOLFOX4 chemotherapy].
Li, SD; Li, XJ; Shi, JH, 2016
)
"Advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with monoclonal antibodies for treating patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM) have not been established."( The COMET Open-label Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFOX or XELOX Treatment Combined with Molecular Targeting Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients with Resectable Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer.
Deguchi, T; Inagaki, H; Ishigure, K; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kondo, A; Kondo, K; Matsui, T; Matsuoka, H; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Sato, M; Sato, Y; Shibata, Y; Takahashi, T; Takano, N; Tanaka, C; Tanaka, H, 2017
)
"Neoadjuvant therapy using FOLFOX/XELOX combined with monoclonal antibodies did not improve PFS, although it was administered safely and had less adverse effects after liver resection."( The COMET Open-label Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFOX or XELOX Treatment Combined with Molecular Targeting Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients with Resectable Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer.
Deguchi, T; Inagaki, H; Ishigure, K; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kondo, A; Kondo, K; Matsui, T; Matsuoka, H; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Sato, M; Sato, Y; Shibata, Y; Takahashi, T; Takano, N; Tanaka, C; Tanaka, H, 2017
)
" This randomized phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of icrucumab and ramucirumab each in combination with mFOLFOX-6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line therapy with a fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan."( Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFOX-6 in combination with ramucirumab or icrucumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line irinotecan-based therapy.
Alcindor, T; Asmis, T; Bendell, J; Berry, S; Binder, P; Burkes, R; Chan, E; Chan, T; Gao, L; Gill, S; Jeyakumar, A; Kambhampati, SR; Kauh, J; Kudrik, F; Moore, M; Nasroulah, F; Ramdas, N; Rao, S; Rothenstein, J; Spratlin, J; Strevel, E; Tang, PA; Tang, S; Yang, L; Zbuk, K, 2016
)
"Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mFOLFOX-6 alone (mFOLFOX-6) or in combination with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg IV (RAM+mFOLFOX-6) or icrucumab 15 mg/kg IV (ICR+mFOLFOX-6) every 2 weeks."( Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFOX-6 in combination with ramucirumab or icrucumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line irinotecan-based therapy.
Alcindor, T; Asmis, T; Bendell, J; Berry, S; Binder, P; Burkes, R; Chan, E; Chan, T; Gao, L; Gill, S; Jeyakumar, A; Kambhampati, SR; Kauh, J; Kudrik, F; Moore, M; Nasroulah, F; Ramdas, N; Rao, S; Rothenstein, J; Spratlin, J; Strevel, E; Tang, PA; Tang, S; Yang, L; Zbuk, K, 2016
)
" In vivo experiments confirmed the enhanced antitumor activity of the 5-FU + NaLV simultaneous combination with a good toxicity profile, whereas the sequential combination with CaLV failed to potentiate 5-FU activity."( Simultaneous, But Not Consecutive, Combination With Folinate Salts Potentiates 5-Fluorouracil Antitumor Activity In Vitro and In Vivo.
Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Di Desidero, T; Di Paolo, A; Orlandi, P, 2017
)
"One-hundred twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned to parsatuzumab, 400 mg, or placebo, in combination with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg."( Randomized Phase II Trial of Parsatuzumab (Anti-EGFL7) or Placebo in Combination with FOLFOX and Bevacizumab for First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Anderson, M; Argiles, G; Braiteh, F; Chang, I; Chen, D; Funke, R; García-Carbonero, R; Gore, I; Hegde, P; Hurwitz, H; Jassem, J; McCall, B; Rhee, I; Rivera, F; Stroh, M; Tebbutt, N; van Cutsem, E; Wainberg, ZA; Wakshull, E; Ye, W, 2017
)
"The CONCERT study (observational cohort study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initiating chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab) aimed to describe patient characteristics, bevacizumab use, its efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and its safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in daily medical practice."( Observational Cohort Study of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Initiating Chemotherapy in Combination With Bevacizumab (CONCERT).
André, T; Asselain, B; Bennouna, J; Ducreux, M; Phelip, JM, 2017
)
" Patients with mCRC initiating bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy were included and followed up for ≤ 36 months."( Observational Cohort Study of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Initiating Chemotherapy in Combination With Bevacizumab (CONCERT).
André, T; Asselain, B; Bennouna, J; Ducreux, M; Phelip, JM, 2017
)
" Bevacizumab was mainly started at 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks (95%) and mostly combined with FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan; 68."( Observational Cohort Study of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Initiating Chemotherapy in Combination With Bevacizumab (CONCERT).
André, T; Asselain, B; Bennouna, J; Ducreux, M; Phelip, JM, 2017
)
"Cetuximab vs bevacizumab combined with either mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen chosen by the treating physician and patient."( Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Atkins, JN; Benson, AB; Berry, S; Bertagnolli, MM; Blanke, C; El-Khoueiry, AB; Fruth, B; Goldberg, RM; Greene, C; Hochster, HS; Innocenti, F; Lenz, HJ; Mayer, RJ; Meyerhardt, JA; Mulkerin, DL; Niedzwiecki, D; O'Neil, BH; O'Reilly, EM; Polite, BN; Schilsky, RL; Schrag, D; Venook, AP; Watson, P, 2017
)
"This phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of tivantinib in combination with standard dose FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination for patients with previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, or stomach."( A Phase II Study of the c-Met Inhibitor Tivantinib in Combination with FOLFOX for the Treatment of Patients with Previously Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Junction, or Stomach.
Bendell, J; Flores, M; Hemphill, B; Kurkjian, C; Pant, S; Patel, M; Thompson, D, 2017
)
" The expansion dose was established as tivantinib 360 mg BID in combination with FOLFOX."( A Phase II Study of the c-Met Inhibitor Tivantinib in Combination with FOLFOX for the Treatment of Patients with Previously Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Junction, or Stomach.
Bendell, J; Flores, M; Hemphill, B; Kurkjian, C; Pant, S; Patel, M; Thompson, D, 2017
)
"Surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy is considered as the gold-standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients."( Effect of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment.
Chen, L; Huang, L; Lin, X; Xie, Y; Zheng, Q, 2017
)
" Among these patients, 71 patients received first-line treatment only (non-DC-CIK group), while the other 71 patients who had similar demographic and clinical characteristics received a DC-CIK cell infusion combined with first-line treatment (DC-CIK group)."( Effect of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment.
Chen, L; Huang, L; Lin, X; Xie, Y; Zheng, Q, 2017
)
"Our results showed that patients with advanced colorectal cancer might benefit from DC-CIK immunotherapy combined with first-line therapy by significantly prolonging 5-year OS and PFS."( Effect of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment.
Chen, L; Huang, L; Lin, X; Xie, Y; Zheng, Q, 2017
)
"PRODIGE 41-BEVANEC is an academic randomized, phase II study designed to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI after failure of CT1 in unknown primary NEC and GEP-NEC."( Evaluating bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI after the failure of platinum-etoposide regimen in patients with advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma: The PRODIGE 41-BEVANEC randomized phase II study.
Assenat, E; Bouarioua, N; Cadiot, G; Coriat, R; Dahan, L; Dubreuil, O; Elhajbi, F; Ferru, A; Gangloff, A; Granger, V; Hautefeuille, V; Hentic, O; Kurtz, JE; Le Malicot, K; Lepage, C; Lepere, C; Lievre, A; Lombard-Bohas, C; Malka, D; Roquin, G; Scoazec, JY; Smith, D; Walter, T, 2018
)
" We report 2 patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis treated with 4 courses each of FOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab, which led to a complete response."( [Five-Year Survival of Two Patients with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Treated with Four FOLFOX6and Four FOLFIRI Courses in Combination with Bevacizumab].
Ohara, H; Yamamoto, H, 2018
)
"To investigate the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with a leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen (PLF regimen; q2w) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for advanced gastric cancer."( Retrospective study on efficacy of a paclitaxel combined with a leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen for advanced gastric cancer.
Chen, Q; Lin, X; Shi, C; Wang, X; Yang, B, 2019
)
" We compared tolerability and efficacy of the two different chemotherapy regimens; 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) versus cisplatin with capecitabine (XP) combined with radiotherapy (RT) in the adjuvant therapy of the lymph node positive locally advanced gastric cancer."( Capecitabine-cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in combination with radiotherapy for adjuvant therapy of lymph node positive locally advanced gastric cancer.
Bilici, A; Erkol, B; Figen, M; Surmelioglu, A; Tilki, M; Ustaalioglu, BBO; Uyar, S, 2018
)
" Group 2 (n = 58) received 5-FU/LV combined with RT postoperatively."( Capecitabine-cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in combination with radiotherapy for adjuvant therapy of lymph node positive locally advanced gastric cancer.
Bilici, A; Erkol, B; Figen, M; Surmelioglu, A; Tilki, M; Ustaalioglu, BBO; Uyar, S, 2018
)
" Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either BEVZ92 or reference bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle every 2 weeks) in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI)."( Bevacizumab biosimilar BEVZ92 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Abdalla, KC; Bondarenko, I; Del Campo García, A; Franke, F; Huerga, C; Melo Cruz, F; Mendonça Bariani, G; Millán, S; Ostwal, V; Paravisini, A; Peredpaya, S; Rahuman, SA; Ramesh, A; Roca, E; Romera, A; Shah, P; Shparyk, Y, 2018
)
"Our results suggest that BEVZ92 and reference bevacizumab are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have no appreciable differences in efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety profiles as first-line treatment in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Bevacizumab biosimilar BEVZ92 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Abdalla, KC; Bondarenko, I; Del Campo García, A; Franke, F; Huerga, C; Melo Cruz, F; Mendonça Bariani, G; Millán, S; Ostwal, V; Paravisini, A; Peredpaya, S; Rahuman, SA; Ramesh, A; Roca, E; Romera, A; Shah, P; Shparyk, Y, 2018
)
" In this phase I study, we evaluated the safety of ip PTX combined with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab) or capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CapeOX-bevacizumab) for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis."( Safety of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase I trial.
Emoto, S; Hata, K; Hiyoshi, M; Ishihara, S; Ishimaru, K; Kaneko, M; Kawai, K; Muro, K; Murono, K; Nagata, H; Nishikawa, T; Nozawa, H; Otani, K; Sasaki, K; Shuno, Y; Tanaka, T, 2019
)
"The adverse events of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab or CapeOX-bevacizumab in combination with ip PTX were considered similar to those described in previous studies of oxaliplatin-based treatment alone."( Safety of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase I trial.
Emoto, S; Hata, K; Hiyoshi, M; Ishihara, S; Ishimaru, K; Kaneko, M; Kawai, K; Muro, K; Murono, K; Nagata, H; Nishikawa, T; Nozawa, H; Otani, K; Sasaki, K; Shuno, Y; Tanaka, T, 2019
)
"In order to reduce the frequency and the severity of oxaliplatin-related sensory-neuropathy and preserve antitumor efficacy, we performed alternating 4 mFOLFOX6 and 4 FOLFIRI cycles, in combination with bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( [A Case of a Patient with Rectum Cancer with Multiple Metastases, Who Was Able to Undergo Conversion Therapy Using Alternating mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI Regimens in Combination with Alternating Cetuximab and Bevacizumab].
O'hara, H; Yamamoto, H, 2018
)
"Polypharmacy of elderly oncology patients and fragmented medication management are well-known risk factors for drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Nightmares and hallucinations with aprepitant and opium powder: a suspected drug-drug interaction.
Azzouz, B; Bouché, O; Clarenne, J; Narjoux, G; Slimano, F; Zeller, PS, 2019
)
" The studies observed patients with wild-type [Kirsten] rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ([K]RAS/RAS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), who had been treated with panitumumab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the first line or with panitumumab combined with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the second line following fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy."( Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Describe the Use of Panitumumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Real-World Clinical Practice for Patients with Wild-Type RAS mCRC.
Bjorklof, K; Buchler, T; Csoszi, T; Demonty, G; Hebart, H; Kafatos, G; Kiehl, M; Koukakis, R; Kuhn, A; Tomasek, J, 2019
)
" We report a potential drug-drug interaction in 2 female patients both receiving treatment for HIV and cerebral toxoplasmosis: one case between E/C/F/TAF with calcium carbonate and a second case involving leucovorin as calcium salt."( HIV Viral Rebound Due to a Possible Drug-Drug Interaction between Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide and Calcium-Containing Products: Report of 2 Cases.
El-Sayed, D; Kang-Birken, SL; Prichard, J,
)
" To test this hypothesis, we analyzed CEA and CA19-9 serum levels in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy."( The Role of Serum CEA and CA19-9 in Efficacy Evaluations and Progression-Free Survival Predictions for Patients Treated with Cetuximab Combined with FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer.
Dai, G; Gou, M; Jia, J; Qian, N; Yang, F; Zhang, P, 2019
)
"CEA and CA19-9 are useful indicators of therapeutic curative effect from cetuximab combined with first-line chemotherapy."( The Role of Serum CEA and CA19-9 in Efficacy Evaluations and Progression-Free Survival Predictions for Patients Treated with Cetuximab Combined with FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer.
Dai, G; Gou, M; Jia, J; Qian, N; Yang, F; Zhang, P, 2019
)
"This study explores the effect of preoperative radiotherapy combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC)."( Clinical Evaluation of Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy on Patients with Locally Advanced Colon Cancer.
Guo, Z; Li, S; Qiao, W; Yu, W; Zhou, J, 2019
)
" This is the first clinical trial assessing safety and tolerability of Genistein in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer."( Genistein combined with FOLFOX or FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: phase I/II pilot study.
Ang, C; Dharmupari, S; Holcombe, RF; Moshier, E; Pintova, S; Zubizarreta, N, 2019
)
"gov, NCT01506167) that recruited patients with metastatic colorectal cancer scheduled to receive bevacizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice."( ACORN: Observational Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With First-Line Chemotherapy for Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the UK.
Baijal, S; Chau, I; Cunningham, D; Ellis, R; Harrison, M; Khakoo, S; Ograbek, A; Pedley, I; Raouf, S; Ross, P; Steward, W; Tahir, S, 2019
)
" In the NAPOLI-1 trial, liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil (nal-iri/5FU) was shown to improve overall survival when compared to fluorouracil alone for metastatic pancreatic cancer."( Comparison of conventional versus liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.
Arango, MJ; Noonan, AM; Porter, K; Reardon, J; Tossey, JC; VanDeusen, JB, 2019
)
"This study aimed to examine the efficacy of metabolically supported administration of chemotherapy combined with ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer."( Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Metabolically Supported Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine-Based or FOLFIRINOX Regimen Combined with Ketogenic Diet, Hyperthermia, and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
Iyikesici, MS, 2020
)
" We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with PDAC would be safe and effective."( Pembrolizumab in Combination with the Oncolytic Virus Pelareorep and Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib Study.
Arora, SP; Cheetham, K; Coffey, M; Eng, KH; Fields, P; Fountzilas, C; Kalinski, P; Mahalingam, D; Moseley, JL; Nuovo, G; Raber, P; Wilkinson, GA; Zhang, B, 2020
)
"This Phase IIb (NCT02195180) open-label study evaluated erythrocyte-encapsulated asparaginase (eryaspase) in combination with chemotherapy in second-line advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma."( Erythrocyte-encapsulated asparaginase (eryaspase) combined with chemotherapy in second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: An open-label, randomized Phase IIb trial.
Andre, T; Bachet, JB; Bouche, O; Cros, J; De La Fouchardiere, C; El Hajbi, F; El Hariry, I; Fabienne, P; Faroux, R; Guimbaud, R; Gupta, A; Hamm, A; Hammel, P; Kay, R; Lecomte, T; Louvet, C; Metges, JP; Mineur, L; Rebischung, C; Tougeron, D; Tournigand, C, 2020
)
"Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to either eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine or mFOLFOX6 (eryaspase arm), or to gemcitabine or mFOLFOX6 alone (control arm)."( Erythrocyte-encapsulated asparaginase (eryaspase) combined with chemotherapy in second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: An open-label, randomized Phase IIb trial.
Andre, T; Bachet, JB; Bouche, O; Cros, J; De La Fouchardiere, C; El Hajbi, F; El Hariry, I; Fabienne, P; Faroux, R; Guimbaud, R; Gupta, A; Hamm, A; Hammel, P; Kay, R; Lecomte, T; Louvet, C; Metges, JP; Mineur, L; Rebischung, C; Tougeron, D; Tournigand, C, 2020
)
"Eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy is associated with improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of ASNS expression in second-line advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma."( Erythrocyte-encapsulated asparaginase (eryaspase) combined with chemotherapy in second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: An open-label, randomized Phase IIb trial.
Andre, T; Bachet, JB; Bouche, O; Cros, J; De La Fouchardiere, C; El Hajbi, F; El Hariry, I; Fabienne, P; Faroux, R; Guimbaud, R; Gupta, A; Hamm, A; Hammel, P; Kay, R; Lecomte, T; Louvet, C; Metges, JP; Mineur, L; Rebischung, C; Tougeron, D; Tournigand, C, 2020
)
"To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of FOLFOX6 regimen and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer."( A comparative analysis on clinical efficacy of FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer.
Li, E; Liu, Y; Shao, H; Tai, Q; Zhao, R,
)
"The clinical data of 96 patients with advanced gastric cancer admitted and subjected to NACT combined with radical gastrectomy in our hospital from September 2013 to September 2017 were collected, and the patients were divided into FOLFOX6 group (n=48) and DCF group (n=48) according to the NACT regimens received."( A comparative analysis on clinical efficacy of FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer.
Li, E; Liu, Y; Shao, H; Tai, Q; Zhao, R,
)
"The FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as NACT combined with radical gastrectomy have curative effects in treating locally advanced gastric cancer, preferable clinical response rate and disease control rate can be obtained, and the adverse reactions of the chemotherapy are tolerable."( A comparative analysis on clinical efficacy of FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer.
Li, E; Liu, Y; Shao, H; Tai, Q; Zhao, R,
)
" The following study aims to determine whether cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is a cost-effective regimen for patients with specific RAS wt mCRC in China."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Ding, H; Fang, L; Gao, P; Huang, L; Wang, H; Ye, W; Zhu, Z, 2020
)
"Despite the survival benefit, cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is not a cost-effective treatment for the first-line regime of patients with RAS wt mCRC in China."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Ding, H; Fang, L; Gao, P; Huang, L; Wang, H; Ye, W; Zhu, Z, 2020
)
" Particularly, the expression of tumour-suppressing gene Ccdc80 was induced by vactosertib and further induced by vactosertib in combination with nal-IRI/5-FU/LV."( Inhibition of TGF-β signalling in combination with nal-IRI plus 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin suppresses invasion and prolongs survival in pancreatic tumour mouse models.
An, H; Heo, JS; Hong, CP; Hong, E; Kang, JM; Kim, SJ; Lee, S; Ooshima, A; Park, J; Park, JO; Park, S; Park, SH, 2020
)
"We demonstrated in this study that dose escalation using IMRT in combination with platin-based chemotherapy as a definitive treatment for esophageal carcinoma is safe and results in higher loco-regional and control survival when compared to previously reported data."( Tolerance and efficacy of dose escalation using IMRT combined with chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal carcinoma: Long-term results of 51 patients.
Carrère, N; Dalmasso, C; Guimbaud, R; Izar, F; Lusque, A; Modesto, A; Moyal, E; Rives, M; Vieillevigne, L, 2020
)
" The drug combination administered at clinical doses resulted in significantly higher antagonistic interactions compared to the low-dose optimized drug combination (ODC)."( Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment.
Nowak-Sliwinska, P; Ramzy, GM; Rausch, M; Zoetemelk, M, 2020
)
" Against this backdrop, the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan(nal-IRI)in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid(FF)for progressive metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine therapy was confirmed in Europe in 2015 ahead of Japan."( [Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Combination with Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid, As a New Option for Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer].
Ueno, M, 2020
)
" The data sources were the VELOUR (Aflibercept Versus Placebo in Combination With Irinotecan and 5-FU in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of an Oxaliplatin Based Regimen) and RAISE (Ramucirumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Second-Line FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma That Progressed During or After First-Line Therapy With Bevacizumab, Oxaliplatin, and a Fluoropyrimidine) trials, which compared FOLFIRI alone with AFL or RAM in second-line treatment for mCRC."( Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
Kashiwa, M; Matsushita, R, 2020
)
"AtezoTRIBE is a prospective, open label, phase II, comparative trial in which initially unresectable and previously untreated mCRC patients, irrespective of microsatellite status, are randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive up to 8 cycles of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab plus 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin with or without atezolizumab according to treatment arm until disease progression."( AtezoTRIBE: a randomised phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab as initial therapy for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Antoniotti, C; Aprile, G; Bergamo, F; Boccaccino, A; Boni, L; Borelli, B; Brunella, DS; Corallo, S; Cremolini, C; Falcone, A; Grassi, E; Lonardi, S; Marmorino, F; Morano, F; Moretto, R; Pietrantonio, F; Racca, P; Rossini, D; Salvatore, L; Tamberi, S; Tamburini, E; Tortora, G, 2020
)
"IORT using the INTRABEAM radiation system combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy is promising for select patients with PVTT."( INTRABEAM intraoperative radiotherapy combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
Han, M; He, Y; Liang, H; Shao, Z; Song, X, 2020
)
" with mCRC RAS/BRAF mutated, in first line will receive nivolumab in combination with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab every 2 weeks for 8 cycles followed by maintenance with bevacizumab plus nivolumab every 2 weeks."( Phase II study on first-line treatment of NIVolumab in combination with folfoxiri/bevacizumab in patients with Advanced COloRectal cancer RAS or BRAF mutated - NIVACOR trial (GOIRC-03-2018).
Antonuzzo, L; Bergamo, F; Berselli, A; Bordonaro, R; Damato, A; Iachetta, F; Maiello, E; Nasti, G; Normanno, N; Pinto, C; Romagnani, A; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2020
)
"We describe our experience with serial uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with standard weekly methotrexate and a eight-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) treatment regimen in the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder at 7 weeks of gestation."( Successful treatment of placenta accreta spectrum disorder using management strategy of serial uterine artery embolization combined with standard weekly and a 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid regimens at 7 weeks of gestation.
Chou, MM; Chuang, SW; Lu, YA; Yuan, JC, 2020
)
"Early diagnosis of the PAS disorder could result in better obstetric outcome through earlier intervention using serial UAE combined with standard weekly and a eight day MTX//FA regimen in the first trimester of pregnancy."( Successful treatment of placenta accreta spectrum disorder using management strategy of serial uterine artery embolization combined with standard weekly and a 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid regimens at 7 weeks of gestation.
Chou, MM; Chuang, SW; Lu, YA; Yuan, JC, 2020
)
" Although the survival benefits when combined with chemotherapy have been determined, there are no studies comparing the two agents with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment."( The effectiveness of cetuximab and panitumumab when combined with FOLFIRI in second-line treatment of KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancers. Single centre experience.
Almuradova, E; Çakar, B; Doğanavşargil, B; Gürsoy, P; Harman, M; Karabulut, B; Karateke, M; Sezak, M, 2021
)
" In this phase II study, we prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combined with S-1 (RS regimen) in the treatment of mCRC after the failure of conventional chemotherapy."( A prospective phase II study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chen, Z; Guo, W; Huang, M; Li, W; Qiu, L; Wang, C; Wang, Y; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhao, X; Zhu, X, 2021
)
"The use of sodium levofolinate (Na-Lev) is safe in combination with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal tumors treated with the FOLFIRI regimen."( Prospective Observational Study Comparing Calcium and Sodium Levofolinate in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the FOLFIRI Regimen.
Bartolini, G; Crudi, L; Donati, C; Foca, F; Frassineti, GL; Masini, C; Matteucci, L; Monti, M; Pagan, F; Passardi, A; Rapposelli, I; Ruscelli, S; Sbaffi, S; Sullo, F; Valgiusti, M, 2021
)
"The objectives of this study were to compare the safety profiles of sodium levofolinate (Na-Lev) and calcium levofolinate (Ca-Lev) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the FOLFIRI regimen and to measure the organizational impact of the introduction of Na-Lev on drug production and administration."( Prospective Observational Study Comparing Calcium and Sodium Levofolinate in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the FOLFIRI Regimen.
Bartolini, G; Crudi, L; Donati, C; Foca, F; Frassineti, GL; Masini, C; Matteucci, L; Monti, M; Pagan, F; Passardi, A; Rapposelli, I; Ruscelli, S; Sbaffi, S; Sullo, F; Valgiusti, M, 2021
)
"Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed demonstrated positive antitumor efficacy and acceptable toxicity."( Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 and Raltitrexed for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Phase II Study.
Bi, F; Cao, D; Chen, Y; Cheng, K; Gou, HF; Li, Q; Li, ZP; Liu, JY; Luo, DY; Qiu, M; Shen, YL; Wang, X; Yang, Y; Zhou, YW, 2021
)
" In the present study, we assessed the activity and safety of bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed."( Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 and Raltitrexed for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Phase II Study.
Bi, F; Cao, D; Chen, Y; Cheng, K; Gou, HF; Li, Q; Li, ZP; Liu, JY; Luo, DY; Qiu, M; Shen, YL; Wang, X; Yang, Y; Zhou, YW, 2021
)
"Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed showed promising antitumor activity and safety in refractory mCRC."( Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 and Raltitrexed for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Phase II Study.
Bi, F; Cao, D; Chen, Y; Cheng, K; Gou, HF; Li, Q; Li, ZP; Liu, JY; Luo, DY; Qiu, M; Shen, YL; Wang, X; Yang, Y; Zhou, YW, 2021
)
" We conducted this phase Ib/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in combination with FOLFOX4 for treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)."( Camrelizumab Combined with FOLFOX4 Regimen as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Sub-Cohort of a Multicenter Phase Ib/II Study.
Chen, Z; Li, H; Liu, Y; Meng, Z; Qin, S; Ren, Z; Wang, L; Xiong, J; Zhang, X; Zou, J, 2021
)
"Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of patients with aHCC showed good safety and tolerability, with promising preliminary antitumor activity."( Camrelizumab Combined with FOLFOX4 Regimen as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Sub-Cohort of a Multicenter Phase Ib/II Study.
Chen, Z; Li, H; Liu, Y; Meng, Z; Qin, S; Ren, Z; Wang, L; Xiong, J; Zhang, X; Zou, J, 2021
)
" Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablative technique that provides an alternative in patients with LAPC and can be safely combined with chemotherapy."( Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Combined With Chemotherapy Increases Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC).
Astras, G; Davakis, S; Dimitrokallis, N; Felekouras, E; Karamouzis, MV; Kountourakis, P; Moris, D; Oikonomou, D; Papalampros, A; Papamichael, D; Petrou, AS; Schizas, D, 2021
)
"Napabucasin 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab was tolerated, with a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC."( Phase I study of napabucasin in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bando, H; Iino, S; Kadowaki, S; Kageyama, R; Kawazoe, A; Masuishi, T; Muro, K; Taniguchi, H; Yoshino, T, 2021
)
"It is necessary to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) combined with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer."( The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, D; Liu, W; Wang, X; You, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, S, 2021
)
"We searched the PubMed et al databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the BEV combined with the FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer up to January 20, 2021."( The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, D; Liu, W; Wang, X; You, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, S, 2021
)
"BEV combined with the FOLFOX regimen is more effective than the FOLFOX regimen alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, but it may also increase the risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions."( The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, D; Liu, W; Wang, X; You, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, S, 2021
)
"To assess the toxicity patterns and effectiveness of doublet chemotherapy when administered at reduced doses of 20% (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) in combination with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) in old, vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Reduced-dose of doublet chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the REVOLT study.
Aprile, G; Avallone, A; Bilancia, D; Brugnatelli, S; Carlomagno, C; Cicero, G; Cinausero, M; Colombo, A; Corsi, D; Dell'Aquila, E; Pinto, C; Rapisardi, S; Reggiardo, G; Rosati, G, 2022
)
" In total, 75 and 43 patients received FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, respectively, in combination with panitumumab (53%) or cetuximab (47%)."( Reduced-dose of doublet chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the REVOLT study.
Aprile, G; Avallone, A; Bilancia, D; Brugnatelli, S; Carlomagno, C; Cicero, G; Cinausero, M; Colombo, A; Corsi, D; Dell'Aquila, E; Pinto, C; Rapisardi, S; Reggiardo, G; Rosati, G, 2022
)
"This study shows that with an appropriate design, including reduced doses, vulnerable older patients best tolerate chemotherapy when combined with anti-EGFR antibodies."( Reduced-dose of doublet chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the REVOLT study.
Aprile, G; Avallone, A; Bilancia, D; Brugnatelli, S; Carlomagno, C; Cicero, G; Cinausero, M; Colombo, A; Corsi, D; Dell'Aquila, E; Pinto, C; Rapisardi, S; Reggiardo, G; Rosati, G, 2022
)
"Traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMJs) combined with FOLFOX4 regimen could achieve favorable effects in the treatment of gastric cancer."( Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Du, X; Jiang, L; Ouyang, J; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
"PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Scientific Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang Data were searched to identify randomized controlled trials which focused on TCMJs combined with FOLFOX4 against gastric cancer from its inception to September 2021."( Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Du, X; Jiang, L; Ouyang, J; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
"The conclusion of this systematic review will provide evidence for selecting an optimal TCMJ combined with FOLFOX4 for patients with gastric cancer."( Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Du, X; Jiang, L; Ouyang, J; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
"Doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAb), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, or the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor mAb bevacizumab, are the current recommended standard of care therapies for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Triplet chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR agents for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Current evidence, advances, and future perspectives.
Cremolini, C; Esser, R; Falcone, A; Folprecht, G; Martinelli, E; Mazard, T; Modest, DP; Tsuji, A, 2022
)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and explore potential factors of efficacy."( Efficacy of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Liu, H; Rong, X; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Yu, H; Zhao, J, 2022
)
" They provided informed consent and were treated with apatinib combined with FOLFIRI according to the scheduled regimen until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred."( Efficacy of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Liu, H; Rong, X; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Yu, H; Zhao, J, 2022
)
"Apatinib combined with FOLFIRI for the first-line treatment of advanced unresectable mCRC showed good efficacy and safety."( Efficacy of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Liu, H; Rong, X; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Yu, H; Zhao, J, 2022
)
"To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed with oxaliplatin-containing regimen."( Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received oxaliplatin-containing regimen.
Ahn, MS; Bae, BN; Baik, SH; Beom, SH; Han, SW; Jeon, SY; Jo, HJ; Kang, MH; Kim, DH; Kim, HK; Kim, JG; Kim, JH; Kim, JS; Kim, JY; Lee, MA; Lee, S; Oh, J; Park, I; Park, YS; Shin, SH; Yoon, JA; Zang, DY, 2023
)
"Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI was effective and showed an acceptable safety profile in Korean patients with mCRC in daily clinical practice."( Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received oxaliplatin-containing regimen.
Ahn, MS; Bae, BN; Baik, SH; Beom, SH; Han, SW; Jeon, SY; Jo, HJ; Kang, MH; Kim, DH; Kim, HK; Kim, JG; Kim, JH; Kim, JS; Kim, JY; Lee, MA; Lee, S; Oh, J; Park, I; Park, YS; Shin, SH; Yoon, JA; Zang, DY, 2023
)
" Currently, no trials have investigated the impact of perioperative immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma."( Perioperative treatment in resectable gastric cancer with spartalizumab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT): a phase II study (GASPAR).
Brachet, PE; Castera-Tellier, M; Clarisse, B; Corbinais, S; Dorbeau, M; Dos Santos, M; Galais, MP; Guilloit, JM; Le Gallic, C; Leconte, A; Lequesne, J; Parzy, A; Poulain, L; Varatharajah, S; Vaur, D; Weiswald, LB, 2022
)
"GASPAR trial is a multicenter open-label, nonrandomized, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Spartalizumab in combination with the FLOT regimen as perioperative treatment for resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma."( Perioperative treatment in resectable gastric cancer with spartalizumab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT): a phase II study (GASPAR).
Brachet, PE; Castera-Tellier, M; Clarisse, B; Corbinais, S; Dorbeau, M; Dos Santos, M; Galais, MP; Guilloit, JM; Le Gallic, C; Leconte, A; Lequesne, J; Parzy, A; Poulain, L; Varatharajah, S; Vaur, D; Weiswald, LB, 2022
)
"Currently, no trials have investigated the impact of immunotherapy in combination with FLOT chemotherapy as perioperative treatment for resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma."( Perioperative treatment in resectable gastric cancer with spartalizumab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT): a phase II study (GASPAR).
Brachet, PE; Castera-Tellier, M; Clarisse, B; Corbinais, S; Dorbeau, M; Dos Santos, M; Galais, MP; Guilloit, JM; Le Gallic, C; Leconte, A; Lequesne, J; Parzy, A; Poulain, L; Varatharajah, S; Vaur, D; Weiswald, LB, 2022
)
"This multicenter single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted panitumumab usage combined with cytotoxic doublets for unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of the continuous use of panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Exploratory sequential examination of acquired mutations in circulating cell-free DNA.
Akazawa, N; Ando, T; Hirata, K; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Maeda, H; Mishima, H; Nagasaka, T; Nagata, N; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Shiozawa, M; Watanabe, J; Yamada, T; Yokota, M, 2022
)
"Cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy is a standard first-line treatment regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) RAS wild-type (wt); however, the efficacy of cetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) had never been demonstrated in a prospective, randomized, controlled phase III study."( [The TAILOR study establishes, in patients mCRC wt, the first line use of FOLFOX in combination with cetuximab].
Colombo, A; Porretto, CM; Rosati, G, 2022
)
"This study aimed to investigate the effect of the mFOLFOX6 regimen combined with SHR-1210 on immune function and prognosis in patients with microsatellite instability CRC."( Effects of mFOLFOX6 regimen combined with carrelizumab on immune function and prognosis in patients with microsatellite instability colorectal cancer.
Lu, P; Sun, J; Wang, Y; Yao, N, 2022
)
" This Phase I/II study examined the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose pulsed AZD8931, an EGFR/HER2/HER3 inhibitor, combined with chemotherapy, in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)."( PANTHER: AZD8931, inhibitor of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB3 signalling, combined with FOLFIRI: a Phase I/II study to determine the importance of schedule and activity in colorectal cancer.
Barber, PR; Forsyth, S; Gao, F; Hackett, LD; Hartley, JA; Hochhauser, D; Lopes, A; Lowe, HL; Ng, TT; Pearce, S; Propper, DJ; Sarker, D; Saunders, MP; Spanswick, VJ; Weitsman, GE; White, L, 2023
)
" FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, each in combination with E+C, were the most active first-line treatments as compared with E+C or to chemotherapy alone."( Antitumor Efficacy of Dual Blockade with Encorafenib + Cetuximab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Human BRAFV600E-Mutant Colorectal Cancer.
Altucci, L; Anderson, A; Ciardiello, D; Ciardiello, F; Coker, O; De Falco, V; Della Corte, CM; Famiglietti, V; Fowlkes, NW; Kanikarla, P; Kopetz, S; Lee, HM; Martinelli, E; Martini, G; Morris, V; Napolitano, S; Sorokin, A; Tabernero, J; Troiani, T; Villareal, OE; Woods, M, 2023
)
"To date, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are used in combination with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Radiosensitizing Effects of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin Alone and in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil on Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.
Bock, F; Cappel, ML; Frerker, B; Hildebrandt, G; Klautke, G; Kriesen, S; Manda, K, 2023
)
"The meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutic triplet-drug regimen combined with anti-EGFR antibody in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Triplet-drug chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibody as an effective therapy for patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Dong, W; Jiang, T; Jiang, X; Li, H; Li, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, M; Xiao, J; Yin, Z; Zeng, J, 2023
)

Bioavailability

ExcerptReference
" The therapeutic advantage of combination chemotherapy may reside in the whole organism, reflecting increased bioavailability of drug, reduced dose-limiting toxicity or reduced impairment of host defenses; it may reside in the tumor cells, reflecting the multiple molecular mechanisms of interaction mentioned above."( Multiple basis of combination chemotherapy.
Grindey, GB; Mihich, E, 1977
)
"The intestinal absorption and in vivo kinetics of (6S)-[3H]-5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5-methyl-H4folate), (6S)-[3H]-5-formyl-H4folate and [3H]folic acid were investigated to determine whether inherent differences exist in the overall bioavailability of these folates in rats."( Folic acid, 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate and 5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate exhibit equivalent intestinal absorption, metabolism and in vivo kinetics in rats.
Bhandari, SD; Gregory, JF, 1992
)
" Recent clinical trials suggest that oral mesna has adequate bioavailability (roughly 50% by urinary thiol measurements) to prevent urotoxicity in high-dose ifosfamide regimens."( Chemoprotectants for cancer chemotherapy.
Dorr, RT, 1991
)
" The effect of food on the bioavailability of folinic acid has not yet been studied, though it is most frequently administered orally."( Rescue after intermediate and high-dose methotrexate: background, rationale, and current practice.
Borsi, JD; Moe, PJ; Romslo, I; Sagen, E, 1990
)
" Absolute bioavailability was only 4% as a consequence of a significant intestinal first pass effect."( Pharmacokinetics of (-)-folinic acid after oral and intravenous administration of the racemate.
Cheron, JM; Greiner, PO; Marquet, J; Zittoun, J, 1989
)
" Bioavailability was assessed by measuring over 24 hours the blood concentrations of total folates, the parent compound 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, and the metabolite 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, using differential microbiologic assays with Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus faecalis."( Pharmacokinetics of leucovorin calcium after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration.
Gutierrez, ML; Leese, PT; McGuire, BW; Sia, LL; Stokstad, EL, 1988
)
" Absolute bioavailability of the 200-mg oral dose of leucovorin based on AUC was 31% compared with that of the iv dose (6,848 vs."( Absorption kinetics of orally administered leucovorin calcium.
Gutierrez, ML; Haynes, JD; Kisicki, JC; McGuire, BW; Sia, LL; Stokstad, EL, 1987
)
"Biochemical investigations show a decreased bioavailability of 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolic acid in vitamin B12 deficient human cell cultures and bone marrow cells."( [Vitamin B12 as a regulator and methotrexate as an antagonist of folic acid metabolism. Pathophysiologic and clinical aspects].
Sauer, H, 1983
)
" These results indicate that zinc deficiency in pregnant rats decreases folate bioavailability of folinic acid, folate polyglutamates and, to a lesser extent, that of folate monoglutamate."( Zinc deficiency and dietary folate metabolism in pregnant rats.
Blache, D; Coudray, C; Faure, P; Favier, A; Favier, M; Roussel, AM, 1993
)
"The bioequivalence and bioavailability of oral and intravenous formulations of levoleucovorin and leucovorin were studied, and the absolute bioavailabilities of levoleucovorin and leucovorin tablet formulations were determined."( Bioequivalence of oral and injectable levoleucovorin and leucovorin.
DeVito, JM; Johnson, JB; Kozloski, GD; Tonelli, AP, 1993
)
" It has been suggested that this drug may be given by the subcutaneous route and that following a short infusion the bioavailability is similar to that observed after intravenous administration."( Bioavailability of subcutaneous 5-fluorouracil: a case report.
Carlin, W; Dunlop, DJ; Eatock, MM; Soukop, M; Watson, DG, 1996
)
" Trials of new combinations are warranted to take advantage of the pharmacokinetic properties and oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin."( Experience of Oncopaz Cooperative Group with oral fluoropyrimidines in tumors of the stomach, lung, head and neck, and breast.
Belón, J; Blanco, E; Espinosa, E; Feliu, J; Garcia Alfonso, P; Garcia Girón, C; Garrido, P; González Barón, M; Jara, C; Ruiz, A; Vincent, JM; Zamora, P, 1997
)
"It has been suggested that colon cancer risk in ulcerative colitis (UC) is correlated to a reduced bioavailability of folate."( Folic acid supplementation and cell kinetics of rectal mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Biasco, G; Calabrese, C; Di Febo, G; Gionchetti, P; Miglioli, M; Miniero, R; Paganelli, GM; Pironi, L; Rivolta, G; Santucci, R; Zannoni, U, 1997
)
" The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of 1954U89 were examined in male beagle dogs and male CD rats."( The pharmacokinetics of 1954U89, 1,3-diamino-7-(1-ethylpropyl)-8-methyl-7H-pyrrolo-(3,2-f)quinazoline, in dogs and rats after intravenous and oral administration.
Deangelis, DV; Studenberg, SD; Wargin, WA; Woolley, JL, 1997
)
" In addition, we sought to determine whether coadministration of UFT and leucovorin alters the bioavailability of these agents."( Oral UFT plus leucovorin in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer.
Birkhofer, MJ; Meropol, NJ; Noel, D; Sonnichsen, DS, 1997
)
"28 hours and the oral bioavailability in 12 matched subjects was 83."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of aminopterin in patients with refractory malignancies.
Hum, M; Kamen, BA; Marling-Cason, M; Ratliff, AF; Rose, K; Wilson, J; Winick, N, 1998
)
"We conclude that AMT has good oral bioavailability and that, when given on a q12 hour x two weekly schedule, the MTD is 2 mg/m2 with delayed LV rescue."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of aminopterin in patients with refractory malignancies.
Hum, M; Kamen, BA; Marling-Cason, M; Ratliff, AF; Rose, K; Wilson, J; Winick, N, 1998
)
" In addition, a three-treatment by three-period crossover bioavailability comparison of oral LV 30 mg plus UFT 200 mg versus either LV or UFT alone was scheduled for the 8 days preceding the first cycle of therapy."( Bioavailability and phase II study of oral UFT plus leucovorin in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer.
Birkhofer, MJ; Ferreira, I; Meropol, NJ; Noel, D; Sonnichsen, DS, 1999
)
" However, the great interpatient variability observed in UFT and LV pharmacology may have obscured true bioavailability effects in this small patient population."( Bioavailability and phase II study of oral UFT plus leucovorin in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer.
Birkhofer, MJ; Ferreira, I; Meropol, NJ; Noel, D; Sonnichsen, DS, 1999
)
" No correlation was found between the degree of gastrointestinal damage and the presumed bioavailability of co-trimoxazole as estimated from serum levels of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole."( Gastrointestinal damage induced by cytostatic treatment does not affect the bioavailability of co-trimoxazole.
Höglund, P; Johnsson, A; Ljungberg, B; Nilsson-Ehle, I; Nyhlén, A,
)
" The potential benefit of long bioavailability and oral delivery of UFT compares favorably with continuous infusion regimens without the added morbidity of a catheter and pump."( A phase I study of combined UFT plus leucovorin and radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.
Bonner, JA; Childs, HA; Newsome, J; Raben, D; Robert, F; Spencer, SA, 2000
)
" Promising new agents: 5-FU prodrugs and inhibitors of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are promising chemotherapeutic agents with good oral bioavailability which can be combined with other drugs (leucoverin) with acceptable toxicity."( [Metastatic colorectal cancer: new therapeutics].
Brion, N; Paule, B,
)
" Numerous active 5-FU schedules are in clinical use, but erratic oral bioavailability has historically mandated intravenous administration."( Oral therapy for colorectal cancer: how to choose.
Damjanov, N; Meropol, NJ, 2000
)
"The reduced bioavailability of chemotherapeutic agents is one of the reasons that explains the limited efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in high grade glioma patients."( The effect of anticonvulsant drugs on blood levels of methotrexate.
Defanti, CA; Landonio, G; Riva, M; Siena, S, 2000
)
"The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract."( Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Hollis, D; Mayer, RJ; Meropol, NJ; Niedzwiecki, D; Schilsky, RL, 2001
)
" The effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT (2 x 100 mg capsules; dose in terms of FT) and leucovorin (2 x 15 mg tablets) was evaluated in a single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study."( Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin in cancer patients.
Alberts, D; Brooks, D; Damle, B; Ferreira, I; Kaul, S; Pazdur, R; Ravandi, F; Sonnichsen, D; Stewart, D, 2001
)
" The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were investigated for domestic LV tablet and capsule vs an imported tablet."( High-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of leucovorin in plasma: validation and application to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.
Chen, J; Cheng, WB; Duan, GL; Li, D; Zheng, LX, 2002
)
" Milk folate is entirely bound by an excess of folate-binding protein (FBP), prompting speculation that FBP may affect the bioavailability of the limited folate supply."( Dietary interactions influence the effects of bovine folate-binding protein on the bioavailability of tetrahydrofolates in rats.
Jones, ML; Nixon, PF; Treloar, T, 2003
)
" This is probably attributable to the low systemic bioavailability of Oxa."( Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.
Ehrsson, H; Fester, C; Guthoff, I; Kornmann, M; Lotspeich, E; Schatz, M; Wallin, I,
)
"The orally bioavailable matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MMI270 reduces tumour growth metastasis in preclinical models."( A dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MMI270 (previously termed CGS27023A) with 5-FU and folinic acid.
Blackey, R; Cassidy, J; Choi, L; Devlin, M; Eatock, M; Johnson, J; Morrison, R; Owen, S; Twelves, C, 2005
)
" It is well known that the microflora in the colon produce large quantities of folate that approach or exceed recommended dietary intakes; however, there is no direct evidence of the bioavailability of this pool in humans."( Folate is absorbed across the colon of adults: evidence from cecal infusion of (13)C-labeled [6S]-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid.
Aufreiter, S; Fazili, Z; Gregory, JF; Kamalaporn, P; Kim, YI; Marcon, N; O'Connor, DL; Pencharz, PB; Pfeiffer, CM, 2009
)
" In this single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study, we investigated the effects of a low-fat Japanese meal on the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of UFT (2 x 100-mg capsules; dose in terms of tegafur) and leucovorin (1 x 25-mg tablet)."( Effects of a low-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer.
Furuhata, T; Hosokawa, Y; Ishiyama, G; Iwayama, Y; Kimura, Y; Meguro, M; Mizuguchi, T; Nishidate, T; Okita, K; Sasaki, K; Tsuruma, T, 2009
)
" Folinic acid (leucovorin, LV) was preferred to folic acid as its bioavailability is higher."( Effect of leucovorin (folinic acid) on the developmental quotient of children with Down's syndrome (trisomy 21) and influence of thyroid status.
Blehaut, H; Conte, M; de Kermadec, FH; de Portzamparc, V; Mircher, C; Poret, G; Ravel, A; Rethore, MO; Sturtz, FG, 2010
)
" No differences were noted in the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat at the 800- or 1,400-mg dose-levels, suggesting bioavailability saturation."( A randomized phase II study of two doses of vorinostat in combination with 5-FU/LV in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.
Fakih, MG; Groman, A; McMahon, J; Muindi, JR; Wilding, G, 2012
)
" Naturally occurring 5-MTHF has important advantages over synthetic folic acid - it is well absorbed even when gastrointestinal pH is altered and its bioavailability is not affected by metabolic defects."( Folate, folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate are not the same thing.
Panzavolta, G; Scaglione, F, 2014
)
" Because the oral bioavailability of 5-FU is unpredictable and highly variable, 5-FU is commonly administered intravenously."( Role of ABC transporters in fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy response.
Magdy, T; Nies, AT; Schwab, M; Zanger, UM, 2015
)

Dosage Studied

ExcerptReference
"Fifty-one patients with nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasms (NMGTN) were treated with either 4 or 6 mg/kg methotrexate (MTX) and citrovorum factor (CF) rescue to determine if the higher dosage could reduce the number of courses of chemotherapy required to achieve remission."( Methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue for nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasms.
Berkowitz, RS; Goldstein, DP, 1979
)
" Progressive increases in the calcium leucovorin dosage on any schedule reduced both toxicity and the antitumor effect of methotrexate in each model."( Optimization of high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue therapy in the L1210 leukemia and sarcoma 180 murine tumor models.
Dorick, DM; Moccio, DM; Sirotnak, FM, 1978
)
" Significant linear correlations have been obtained between methotrexate dosage and concentrations in plasma at 6 and 24 hours after the initiation of the therapy."( Degradation and clearance of methotrexate in children with osteosarcoma receiving high-dose infusion.
Kim, PY; Lantin, E; Romsdahl, MM; Sutow, WW; van Eys, DC; Wang, YM, 1978
)
" The dosage of methotrexate was sequentially escalated to produce mucositis (the usual dose-limiting toxicity)."( Adjuvant methotrexate and leucovorin in head and neck squamous cancer. Two-year follow-up of a pilot project.
Applebaum, E; Bytell, DE; DeWys, WD; Sisson, GA; Taylor, SG, 1978
)
" All dogs tolerated E g of methotrexate/m2 of body surface, but granulocytopenia precluded escalation beyond this dosage in 4 dogs."( High-dose methotrexate and leucovorin rescue in dogs with osteogenic sarcoma.
Cotter, SM; Parker, LM, 1978
)
"We used MTX as single drug treatment on the basis of an incremental dosage schedule, with doses increased from 250 mg/m2 to 750 mg/m2 or from 5 to 10 g, at intervals of 10 days."( [Results and pharmacokinetic aspects of methotrexate therapy in high doses].
Breyer, S; Graninger, W; Jaschek, I; Lenzhofer, R; Moser, K, 1979
)
" The optimal dosage and duration of the two agents are yet to be determined."( High-dose methotrexate with folinic acid rescue.
Bender, JF; Fortner, CL; Grove, WR, 1977
)
"Cytocidal activity of a drug is dependent on both drug dosage and duration of exposure."( Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies of 24-h infusions of high-dose methotrexate.
Cohen, HJ; Jaffe, N, 1978
)
" Results indicate that the method should be usful in the future in assisting individualization of dosage regimens and in the study of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of MTX in cancer patients."( A radioimmunoassay for methotrexate and its comparison with spectrofluorimetric procedures.
Blum, MR; Loeffler, LJ; Nelsen, MA, 1976
)
" After early dosage modifications, serious toxic side effects were rare in this group of patients who had had extensive prior therapy."( Methotrexate (NSC-740) with citrovorum factor (NSC-3590) rescue, alone and in combination with cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271), in ovarian cancer.
Barlow, JJ; Piver, MS, 1976
)
"In this study, 30 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and high-dose Folinic acid, using a new sequential dosing schedule."( Phase II trial with 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid, using new sequential dosing schedule, in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients.
Bellora, G; Bergamino, T; Ciancio, A; Ferrero, A; Katsaros, D; Sismondi, P; Zola, P, 1992
)
" In contrast to only four of 56 patients with monotherapy, 14 of 39 with the combination treatment at the initial dosage had severe diarrhea with two treatment-related deaths in this latter group."( Fluorouracil versus folinic acid/fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer--preliminary results of a randomized trial.
Günther, E; Hinrichs, HF; Hirschmann, WD; Koniczek, KH; Natt, F; Sondern, W; Steinke, B; Wagner, T; Wander, HE; Werdier, D, 1992
)
" The reduction in methotrexate dosage in m-BACOD patients was not associated with an increased incidence of CNS relapse."( The m-BACOD combination chemotherapy regimen in large-cell lymphoma: analysis of the completed trial and comparison with the M-BACOD regimen.
Canellos, GP; Harrington, DP; Jochelson, MS; Klatt, MM; Pinkus, GS; Rosenthal, DS; Shipp, MA; Skarin, AT; Yeap, BY, 1990
)
" Eighty-seven percent of treatment courses were given in accordance with protocol dosing and schedule."( m-BACOD treatment for intermediate- and high-grade malignant lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial.
Balcerzak, S; Carden, JO; Coltman, CA; Dahlberg, S; Dana, BW; Fisher, RI; Hartley, K; Hartsock, RJ; Miller, TP, 1990
)
" Fifty-five eligible patients were treated at eight dosing levels."( A phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and alpha-2a-interferon in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Bauer, L; Budd, GT; Bukowski, RM; Gibson, V; Inoshita, G; Murthy, S; Prestifilippo, J; Sergi, JS; Yalavarthi, P, 1992
)
" in 15' x 5 days) every 4 weeks (Arm A), or to 5-FU alone at the same dosage (Arm B)."( Folinic acid + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus equidose 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer. Phase III study of 'GISCAD' (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer).
Aitini, E; Barni, S; Beretta, A; Beretta, GD; Cesana, B; Comella, G; Cozzaglio, L; Cristoni, M; Labianca, R; Pancera, G, 1991
)
" Dosage must be adjusted to the results of blood counts."( [Usefulness of folinic acid in cytopenia induced by antiparasitic drugs in AIDS patients].
Leport, C; Niyongabo, T; Vildé, JL, 1991
)
"Maximal dosing of cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs is often limited by the development of severe nonmyelosuppressive toxicities."( Chemoprotectants for cancer chemotherapy.
Dorr, RT, 1991
)
"In a previous study (J Clin Oncol 7:1407-1417, 1989), we identified two dosage administration schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) combined with leucovorin that were superior to single-agent 5FU for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer."( Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil with leucovorin: confirmatory evidence of improved therapeutic efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer.
Gerstner, JB; Kardinal, CG; Krook, JE; Levitt, R; Mailliard, JA; O'Connell, MJ; Poon, MA; Tschetter, LK; Wieand, HS, 1991
)
" Dosage of infused MTX was 1,000-2,000 mg per an artery."( [Intra-arterial infusion of high dose methotrexate therapy in recurrent gliomas].
Hayashi, A; Kyuma, Y, 1990
)
"To determine the maximal tolerable dosage of trimetrexate for treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia, 25 patients were treated each day with 45 mg/m2 of trimetrexate and 80 mg/m2 of leucovorin; 10 received 60 mg/m2 and 80 mg/m2; 12 received 60 mg/m2 and 160 mg/m2; and 6 received 90 mg/m2 and 160 mg/m2, respectively."( Trimetrexate-leucovorin dosage evaluation study for treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
Akil, B; Allegra, CJ; Feinberg, J; Hughlett, C; Lane, HC; Ogata-Arakaki, D; Sattler, FR; Shelhamer, J; Tuazon, CU; Verdegem, TD, 1990
)
"Thirty elderly patients suffering from macrocytic anaemia associated with chronic diseases were treated with folinic acid for 25 days at a dosage of 4-8 mg daily."( [Folinic acid in the treatment of elderly patients with macrocytic anemia].
Criserà, A; Ferrari, MG; Lucchi, R; Sacchetta, AC, 1990
)
"Four single-arm trials using methotrexate (M), 5-fluorouracil (5FU), and leucovorin (L) were sequentially performed in metastatic measurable colorectal cancer using different dosing and timing schedules for the three drugs."( Sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in metastatic measurable colorectal cancer. Does it work?
Cripps, C; Johnston, J; Maroun, J; Stewart, D; Weinerman, B, 1990
)
" Dosing error was excluded, as was the hypothesis that the high concentrations were due to the presence of methotrexate-specific antibodies."( Survival after unexpected high serum methotrexate concentrations in a patient with osteogenic sarcoma.
Bowles, MR; Buttsworth, JA; Grimes, DJ; Nixon, PF; Pond, SM; Ravenscroft, PJ; Thomson, DB; Whiting, RF,
)
" The doses and schedule of drug administration were designed to minimize dosage reduction and treatment delay."( Sixteen-week dose-intense chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
Abeloff, MD; Beveridge, RA; Damron, DJ; Davidson, NE; Donehower, RC; Fetting, JH; Gordon, GG; Waterfield, WC, 1990
)
" Neutropenia can also appear after low (prophylactic) dosage of TMP-SMX, and can be prevented by concomitant administration of folinic acid."( [Neutropenia caused by low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in children with chronic pathology of the urinary tract].
De Manzini, A; Lepore, L; Peratoner, L,
)
" Oral administration over 24 hours results in an AUC of 5-CH3 THF equivalent to that obtained after intravenous dosing in the presence of only small amounts of (6R) LV."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of high-dose leucovorin calcium after intravenous and oral administration.
Ratain, MJ; Schilsky, RL, 1990
)
"Several different strategies to improve the in vitro cytocidal effect of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV), including modulation of dosage and schedule and combination with other cytotoxic agents or biochemical modulators, were examined in the COLO 320DM and Ht-29 cell lines by means of the Bactec system."( A study of various strategies to enhance the cytotoxic activity of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in human colorectal cancer cell lines.
Scheithauer, W; Temsch, EM,
)
" The authors conclude that: (1) individualized dosing of outpatient MTX-CF chemotherapy for symptomatic EP can be safely managed, even in an indigent population; (2) rupture can occur up to 23 days after chemotherapy initiation; (3) fetal cardiac activity is an absolute contraindication to chemotherapy; (4) chemotherapy in patients with symptoms is of limited value because the disease is too far advanced; therefore, it is essential that the diagnosis of EP be established before symptom onset; and (5) chemotherapy offers no significant immediate advantages to outpatient laparoscopic surgery."( Outpatient chemotherapy of unruptured ectopic pregnancy.
Buster, JE; Ling, FW; Stovall, TG, 1989
)
" Groups of tumor bearing mice were treated with saline, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluourouracil plus leucovorin on an optimal dosage schedule."( Selective expansion of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate pools and modulation of 5-fluorouracil antitumor activity by leucovorin in vivo.
Dreyfuss, A; el-Magharbel, I; Frei, E; Holden, SA; Jones, SM; Rosowsky, A; Trites, D; Wright, JE, 1989
)
" Despite the 2-fold attenuation of dosage required, antitumor activity of the combination (increased life span, 161%) was approximately twice that obtained with maximum tolerated doses of either agent alone and tumor-free, long-term survivors were obtained."( Intracavitary therapy of murine ovarian cancer with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and 10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin incorporating systemic leucovorin protection.
DeGraw, JI; Schmid, FA; Sirotnak, FM, 1989
)
" dosage was only half that after oral dosage."( Pharmacokinetics of (-)-folinic acid after oral and intravenous administration of the racemate.
Cheron, JM; Greiner, PO; Marquet, J; Zittoun, J, 1989
)
" The syndrome appears to be associated with high dosage and slow acetylator status."( Sulphasalazine associated pancytopenia may be caused by acute folate deficiency.
Logan, EC; Ryrie, DR; Williamson, LM, 1986
)
" The initial rise in serum folate with intravenous and intramuscular dosing represented 5-formyltetrahydrofolate; this fell concomitantly with the appearance of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate."( Pharmacokinetics of leucovorin calcium after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration.
Gutierrez, ML; Leese, PT; McGuire, BW; Sia, LL; Stokstad, EL, 1988
)
" At these dosage levels, diarrhea was not a limiting toxicity."( High-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced colon cancer.
Arnold, DJ; Balcueva, EP; Dimitrov, NV; Scholnik, AP; Schwenke, P; Suhrland, LG; Walker, WS, 1988
)
" The optimal dosing for MV26PD remains to be determined."( Treatment of refractory lymphoma with methotrexate, VM-26 (teniposide), procarbazine, and dexamethasone: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 7902.
Anderson, J; Bloomfield, CD; Cooper, MR; Ginsberg, SJ; Gottlieb, AJ; Hurd, DD; Lachant, NA, 1988
)
" Dosage adjustment according to body surface area would seem indicated by the toxicity data, with a 5-FU dose of 1200 mg/m2 body surface area and citrovorum factor 50 mg/m2 being recommended for Phase II trials of this combination of drugs given according to this weekly schedule."( Phase I trial of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and citrovorum factor.
Budd, GT; Bukowski, RM; Schreiber, MJ; Steiger, E; Weick, JK, 1986
)
" The toxicities, cumulative VCR dosage, and percentage of ideal dosage observed in 18 patients receiving folinic acid have been compared with those observed in 70 patients who previously received VCR without folinic acid in the same chemotherapy program."( Clinical trial of folinic acid to reduce vincristine neurotoxicity.
Case, LD; Cooper, MR; Jackson, DV; Kaplon, MK; McMahan, RA; Pope, EK; Richards, F; Stuart, JJ; White, DR; Zekan, PJ, 1986
)
" It was found that the blood levels of MTX were maintained at 10(-4) M by the dosage of 500 mg/kg, but no higher levels were achieved by increasing dosage."( Experimental studies on high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor chemotherapy for 89Sr-induced osteosarcoma murine model.
Tomita, K, 1986
)
" Toxicity did not appear to be minimized by attenuation of MTX and/or 5-FU dosage or by increasing the dose and/or duration of LCV."( Continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion and pulse methotrexate/leucovorin for colorectal adenocarcinoma. A report of excessive toxicity.
Anderson, T; Frick, J; Hansen, RM; Quebbeman, EJ; Ritch, PS, 1987
)
" Using an intensive adjuvant treatment, the overall toxicity was tolerable allowing the application of the full therapeutic dosage in 95% without any interruptions."( [Principles of the simultaneous radiation and polychemotherapy in advanced head and neck carcinoma].
Hartenstein, RC; Wendt, TG; Wustrow, TP, 1987
)
" This allows an examination of dose-response relationships and comparisons of therapeutic index."( Comparison of unique leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil "escalating" and "maximum" dosage strategies.
Bruckner, HW; Mayer, R; Novak, J; Petrelli, NJ; Stablein, D, 1987
)
"5 microM at 5 hours, respectively, after termination of CF dosing in all subjects treated at the 800- and 1600-mg dose schedule."( Bioavailability of high-dose oral leucovorin.
Adelstein, DJ; Blum, MR; Giroski, P; Hines, JD; Rustum, YM; Zakem, MH, 1987
)
" From a consideration of the clinical pharmacokinetics of MTX, we suggest other factors that may predispose to the occurrence of marrow toxicity: the presence of hypoalbuminemia, interactions between MTX and other protein bound or weakly acidic drugs, and the repetitive dosing schedule of low dose MTX."( Pancytopenia associated with low dose pulse methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
MacKinnon, SK; Starkebaum, G; Willkens, RF, 1985
)
"One hundred and ninety-one cases of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were entered in a trial in which, for five months, all received cytotoxic therapy with prednisolone, vincristine, mercaptopurine, L-asparaginase, and methotrexate (the latter in high dosage followed by folinic acid)."( Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Comparison of immunotherapy (B.C.G.), intermittent methotrexate, and no therapy after a five-month intensive cytotoxic regimen ((Concord trial). Preliminary report to the Medical Research Council by the Leukaemi
, 1971
)
" 2 patients were treated with MTX single agent therapy at a dosage of up to 750mg/m2 per cycle and a short CF rescue of 48 hours."( [Methotrexate citrovorum factor therapy in advanced hypernephromas (author's transl)].
Baumgartner, G; Heinz, R; Linemayr, G, 1980
)
"Studies on thirty-six psoriatics revealed no differences in acute liver toxicity of four different intermittent dosage schedules of methotrexate with or without addition of leucovorin, as judged by daily determinations of SGOT for one week."( Methotrexate in psoriasis with and without leucovorin: effect of different dosage schedules on acute liver toxicity.
Bjerring, P; Zachariae, H, 1982
)
" It is concluded that methotrexate with folinic acid at the dosage used in this study, while less toxic than methotrexate alone, is less effective than methotrexate alone in the induction of remission of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic disease."( Treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: results of methotrexate alone versus methotrexate--folinic acid.
Hammond, CB; Smith, EB; Tyrey, L; Weed, JC, 1982
)
" At these dosage levels there were no statistically significant differences in response rate or survival between the two groups."( High-dose methotrexate in small cell lung cancer. Lack of efficacy in preventing CNS relapse.
Capizzi, RL; Carney, C; Delaney, D; Kahn, L; Kirsch, M; Lipper, S; Neijstrom, ES; Rudnick, SA, 1983
)
" Six of 19 patients (32%) treated with high-dose infusion responded (one complete response) and four of 18 patients (22%) receiving standard dosage responded (P = ."( A randomized comparison of high-dose infusion methotrexate versus standard-dose weekly therapy in head and neck squamous cancer.
Hauck, WW; Lad, TE; McGuire, WP; Showel, JL; Taylor, SG, 1984
)
" Use of the principle of concentration X time in dosage calculations will result in the avoidance of giving unnecessarily high doses of methotrexate."( Methotrexate. II. Use in pediatric chemotherapy.
Lippens, RJ, 1984
)
" A comparison of drug dosage in the group receiving TPN and the group receiving standard nutrition is a measure of drug tolerance in these patients."( A prospective randomized study of adjuvant parenteral nutrition in the treatment of diffuse lymphoma: effect on drug tolerance.
Brennan, MF; Fisher, RI; Popp, MB; Simon, RM, 1981
)
" Hypoxanthine protection differed among the cell lines, and the dose-response relationship for protection occurred within the physiologic bone marrow hypoxanthine concentration range."( Comparison of thymidine and folinic acid protection from methotrexate toxicity in human lymphoid cell lines.
Browman, GP, 1982
)
" The preliminary results of this study support the notion of a dose-response relationship to MTX in advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck."( Methotrexate treatment of advanced head and neck cancers: a dose response evaluation.
Fox, RM; Tattersall, MH; Woods, RL, 1981
)
" The current phase I study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles and clinical tolerance of escalating doses of the pure biologically active S-isomer of leucovorin ((S)-LV) given IP with the same dosing schedule of FUDR."( Intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR) and (S)-leucovorin for disease predominantly confined to the peritoneal cavity: a pharmacokinetic and toxicity study.
Chan, KK; Israel, VK; Jeffers, S; Jiang, C; Leichman, CG; Leichman, L; Morrow, CP; Muggia, FM; Roman, L; Tulpule, A, 1995
)
" Low dose and either continuous infusion or repetitive dosing of leucovorin, as well as the effect of treatment sequence and intervals between drugs, require additional investigation."( Preclinical and clinical aspects of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil.
Allegra, CJ; Grogan, L; Sotos, GA, 1994
)
" No significant difference was noted between the "success" and "failure" groups with respect to MTX dose or infusion time, the timing and dosage of folinic acid rescue, the number of courses of MTX, or the mean interval between courses."( High-dose methotrexate for gestational trophoblastic disease.
Covens, A; Elit, L; Gerulath, A; Murphy, J; Osborne, R; Rosen, B; Sturgeon, J, 1994
)
" Continuous subcutaneous infusion at the same total dosage over 3 days gave AUC (0-96 hr) values of 134 nmol/mg protein."( Leucovorin and folic acid regimens for selective expansion of murine 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate pools.
Alperin, W; Pardo, M; Rosowsky, A; Sayeed-Shah, U; Wright, JE, 1995
)
" In this paper, the cellular and clinical pharmacology of 5-FU potentiation by LV are reviewed, and the dosing and administration schedules are discussed in relation to reported clinical trials."( Role of leucovorin dosing and administration schedule.
Jolivet, J,
)
" Epirubicin dosage could be increased to 100 mg m-2 in 53 patients (87%), to 110 mg m-2 in 31 patients (51%) and to 120 mg m-2 in 18 cases (30%)."( Laevofolinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and escalating doses of epirubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in locally advanced and/or metastatic breast carcinoma: a phase I-II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM
Agostara, B; Cariello, S; Colucci, G; Durini, E; Gebbia, V; Giotta, F; Pacilio, G; Pezzella, G; Romito, S; Testa, A, 1995
)
" As a result, the extent of toxicity of cancer chemotherapy varies by 50% or more according to dosing time in mice or rats."( [Chrono-chemotherapy and dose intensity].
Lévi, F, 1995
)
" Animals in Groups III and IV received the same drug dosage for six weeks and were operated at different intervals: Group III at one week and Group IV at two weeks after completion of chemotherapy."( Effect of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on the integrity of colonic anastomoses in the rat.
Gordon, PH; Hananel, N, 1995
)
" Each of these dosage administration schedules has been demonstrated to be superior to single-agent bolus 5FU in previous controlled trials."( Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Buroker, TR; Gerstner, JB; Gesme, DH; Kardinal, CG; Krook, JE; Levitt, R; Mailliard, JA; O'Connell, MJ; Schaefer, PL; Wieand, HS, 1994
)
"Intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin appears to have a superior therapeutic index compared with weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin using the dosage administration schedules applied in this study based on similar therapeutic effectiveness, but lower financial cost, and less need for hospitalization to manage chemotherapy toxicity."( Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Buroker, TR; Gerstner, JB; Gesme, DH; Kardinal, CG; Krook, JE; Levitt, R; Mailliard, JA; O'Connell, MJ; Schaefer, PL; Wieand, HS, 1994
)
" Carboplatin was given as an outpatient on day 1 at a dosage based on the formula: Dose (mg/m2) = (0."( Phase II study of carboplatin and edatrexate (10-EdAM) with leucovorin rescue for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Benner, SE; Dimery, IW; Esparaz, B; Frenning, D; Guillory-Perez, C; Hong, WK; Huber, MH; Lippman, SM; Shirinian, M, 1994
)
" Eleven out of 19 patients (58%; 95% CI:34-80%) showed a complete (2 cases) or partial (9 cases) response to this treatment, regardless of the 5dFUR dosage employed."( Dose-finding study of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine in combination with fixed doses of cisplatin and L-folinic acid for the treatment of advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Biglietto, M; Carteni, G; Catalano, G; Comella, G; Comella, P; Della Vittoria Scarpati, M; Palmieri, G; Pandolfi, A; Stampino, CG,
)
"We examined the importance of dosing interval between leucovorin (LCV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on intracellular thymidylate synthase (TS) ternary complex, free TS and total TS protein levels in human MCF-7 breast and NCI H630 colon cancer cell lines."( The effect of dose and interval between 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on the formation of thymidylate synthase ternary complex in human cancer cells.
Allegra, CJ; Drake, JC; Johnston, PG; Voeller, DM, 1995
)
" l-LV was administered intravenously by a 2-hour infusion at a dosage of 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU at a dosage of 600 mg/m2, intravenously via bolus one hour after administration of l-LV had been started."( [A cooperative late phase II trial of l-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. l-Leucovorin and 5-FU Study Group (Japan Western Group)].
Abe, T; Hirabayashi, N; Kurihara, M; Nakano, S; Ohno, T; Ohta, J; Ohtani, T; Taguchi, T; Takeda, S; Yonemura, Y, 1995
)
" Dosing decisions in older patients are difficult and must integrate assessments of organ function, comorbidities, overall physical status, and goals of treatment, in an effort to ensure the best possible outcome for these patients."( Age and sex are independent predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Analysis of a large scale phase III trial.
Arcangeli, G; Douglass, HO; Driscoll, DL; Meropol, NJ; Petrelli, NJ; Stein, BN, 1995
)
" Intermittent dosing and supplementation with leucovorin have been tried in attempts to improve tolerance."( The tolerance for zidovudine plus thrice weekly or daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with and without leucovorin for primary prophylaxis in advanced HIV disease. California Collaborative Treatment Group.
Bozzette, SA; Forthal, D; Kemper, C; Leedom, J; McCutchan, JA; Richman, DD; Sattler, FR; Tilles, JG, 1995
)
" Clinical toxicity, such as headache and gastrointestinal distress, accounted for the observed difference in tolerance between dosing regimens."( The tolerance for zidovudine plus thrice weekly or daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with and without leucovorin for primary prophylaxis in advanced HIV disease. California Collaborative Treatment Group.
Bozzette, SA; Forthal, D; Kemper, C; Leedom, J; McCutchan, JA; Richman, DD; Sattler, FR; Tilles, JG, 1995
)
" Leucovorin use does not improve tolerance for chronic TMP/SMX dosing in AIDS, even among patients taking tablets daily."( The tolerance for zidovudine plus thrice weekly or daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with and without leucovorin for primary prophylaxis in advanced HIV disease. California Collaborative Treatment Group.
Bozzette, SA; Forthal, D; Kemper, C; Leedom, J; McCutchan, JA; Richman, DD; Sattler, FR; Tilles, JG, 1995
)
" Treatment was well tolerated; 4/27 patients experienced > or = ECOG grade 3 toxicity at full 5-FU dosage (500 mg/m2 bolus/infusion)."( A phase I-II study of N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA) added to 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer.
Canney, PA; Cassidy, J; Jodrell, DI; Kaye, SB; Kerr, DJ; Oster, W; Steward, WP; Yosef, H, 1994
)
" We were not able to increase 5FU weekly dosage above 700 mg/m2 due to the occurrence of grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity."( Weekly levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil plus hydroxyurea in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.
Buccellato, C; Cipolla, C; Comande, S; Curto, G; Gebbia, N; Gebbia, V; Latteri, M; Testa, A; Valenza, R, 1994
)
" The dose-response curve was steep, with 3/3 patients treated at a dose of 1,750 mg/m2 developing grade IV diarrhea."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of floxuridine/leucovorin given on the Roswell Park weekly regimen.
Creaven, PJ; Frank, C; Levine, EG; Meropol, NJ; Petrelli, NJ; Proefrock, A; Raghavan, D; Rodriguez-Bigas, M; Rustum, YM; Udvary-Nagy, S, 1994
)
" This was associated with delivery of 100% of the planned dosage of vincristine, prednisone, and daunorubicin at induction."( Poor outcome of intensive chemotherapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a possible dose effect.
Chan, LC; Chan, TK; Chiu, EK; Kwong, YL; Liang, R; Lie, A; Todd, D, 1994
)
" Eighty per cent reduction of leucovorin dosage leads to a significant decrease in grade 2 and grade 3 haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity."( Local and systemic toxicity of intra-hepatic-arterial 5-FU and high-dose or low-dose leucovorin for liver metastases of colorectal cancer.
Klotz, HP; Largiadèr, F; Weder, W, 1994
)
" A tolerable dosage regimen was radiation at 45 Gy with 4 days of 5-FU plus leucovorin during the first week and 3 days during the last week with postradiation chemotherapy."( Early evaluation of combined fluorouracil and leucovorin as a radiation enhancer for locally unresectable, residual, or recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group.
Burch, PA; Cha, SS; Gunderson, LL; Mailliard, JA; Martenson, JA; McKenna, PJ; Moertel, CG, 1994
)
"The increased embryotoxicity of pyrimethamine (PYM) with concomitant oral dosing of folic acid (FA) was examined in rats."( Synergistic embryotoxicity of combination pyrimethamine and folic acid in rats.
Chung, MK; Han, SS; Roh, JK,
)
" Toxicity (primarily gastrointestinal) necessitated dosage modification in 10 patients (29%)."( Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma: report of a trial with sequential methotrexate, intravenous (loading dose) folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and a literature review.
Balaban, EP; Bull, J; Frenkel, EP; Graham, M; Periman, P; Perkins, S; Pruitt, B; Ross, M; Ruud, C; Sheehan, RG, 1994
)
" The LV dosage was 30 mg/body (low-dose method) and the FU dosage was 500-750 mg/body."( [5-Fluorouracil plus low-dose leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer].
Ban, K; Imanari, T; Machida, T; Masuda, K; Matsumoto, M; Noda, Y; Shida, H; Takei, Y; Yamamoto, T, 1994
)
" Because of severe mucositis, the final 30 patients were treated with the same dosage of cisplatin but with the deletion on day 6 of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil."( Continuous-infusion cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Elias, A; Frei, E; Kalish, LA; Kass, F; Lynch, TJ; Shulman, L; Skarin, A; Strauss, G; Sugarbaker, D, 1994
)
" The addition of IFN-alpha produced more 5-FU-related toxicity compared with a previous study in which the same dosage and schedule of 5-FU plus LV was used."( Continuous infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin and recombinant interferon-alpha-2b in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A Multicenter Phase II study.
Burghouts, JT; Croles, JJ; de Mulder, PH; Kamm, Y; Punt, CJ; van Liessum, PA, 1993
)
" An escalating FU dosing schedule was used to achieve equal toxicity."( A randomized, double-blind trial of fluorouracil plus placebo versus fluorouracil plus oral leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Brenckman, WD; Bukowski, RM; Clendennin, NJ; Collier, MA; Guaspari, A; Laufman, LR; McKinnis, RA; Sullivan, BA, 1993
)
" If the combination is to be given on a protracted basis, 5-FU must be administered at a much smaller dosage than has been traditionally utilized."( A phase I trial of protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion and oral calcium leucovorin.
Anderson, T; Beatty, PA; Hansen, RM; Quebbeman, EJ, 1993
)
" Dosage adjustments for both methotrexate and leucovorin were made as needed, according to a defined protocol."( Low-dose methotrexate with leucovorin (folinic acid) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Bykerk, V; Choquette, D; Esdaile, JM; Hazeltine, M; Kanji, M; Neville, C; Robidoux, L; Shiroky, JB; St-Pierre, A; Zummer, M, 1993
)
" In total, 158 courses (median: 4, range: 1 through 16; 81 and 58 courses at, respectively, a 40 and 50 to 55 mg/m2 daily dosage of C) were delivered using a multichannel programmable in-time pump (Intelliject, Aguettant) connected to a double lumen implanted venous side-port."( Ambulatory chronotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A phase II feasibility trial.
Denis, B; Focan, C; Focan-Henrard, D; Kreutz, F; Levi, F, 1995
)
" In the dose-response range studied there was no apparent affinity for methotrexate."( Purification and characterization of folate binding proteins from rat placenta.
da Costa, M; Rothenberg, SP, 1996
)
" 5FU was given as a 24-hour infusion at a dosage of 4 g/m2 and oral leucovorin at a dosage of 50 mg every 6 hours for four doses, starting with the infusion of 5FU."( Leucovorin and high-dose fluorouracil in metastatic prostate cancer. A phase II trial of the piedmont Oncology Association.
Atkins, JN; Case, LD; Grote, T; McFarland, J; Muss, HB; Richards, F, 1996
)
" Patients who received Tomudex spent a substantially shorter time in hospital for dosing and had significantly lower rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicities such as leucopenia and mucositis."( 'Tomudex' (ZD1694): results of a randomised trial in advanced colorectal cancer demonstrate efficacy and reduced mucositis and leucopenia. The 'Tomudex' Colorectal Cancer Study Group.
Cunningham, D; Harper, P; Kerr, D; Olver, I; Perez-Manga, G; Rath, U; Seitz, JF; Svensson, C; Van Cutsem, E; Zalcberg, JR, 1995
)
" Individualized 5-FU dosing to obtain higher 5-FU plasma concentrations may be indicated."( Pharmacodynamics of fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.
Athanasiadis, I; Dolan, ME; Haraf, DJ; Kies, MS; Kozloff, M; Malone, D; Mick, R; Ratain, MJ; Vokes, EE; Weichselbaum, RR, 1996
)
" A further 46 patients (of whom 22 had been previously treated) received the same treatment as above but with a double dosage (500 mg/m2) of MTX."( Significance of methotrexate serum level achieved in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with sequential methotrexate, L-folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil.
Beneduce, G; Biondi, E; Casaretti, R; Comella, G; Comella, P; Daponte, A; Frasci, G; Gravina, A; Palmieri, G,
)
" For lymphoma, CHOP chemotherapy dosage costs are approximately half of those for CDE infusion related to the specific drug regimen and drug dosage used."( Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors--Part one. Model projections for cost based on charges.
Anderson, NR; Lokich, JJ; Moore, CL, 1996
)
" The principle cost differences between bolus and infusional schedules relate to drug dosage and the toxicity profile."( Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors--Part one. Model projections for cost based on charges.
Anderson, NR; Lokich, JJ; Moore, CL, 1996
)
" Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to hematologic toxicity."( A carboplatin-based regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.
Carroll, PR; Ernest, ML; Fippin, LJ; Small, EJ, 1996
)
" Two patients developed exacerbation of hepatitis when the dosage of prednisolone was reduced after they had ten weeks of high dose prednisolone."( Exacerbation of hepatitis in hepatitis B carriers following chemotherapy for haematological malignancies.
Chong, R; Goh, YT; Lee, LH; Ng, HS; Tan, P; Wong, GC, 1996
)
" In many countries patients with CRC do not receive chemotherapy because some clinicians perceive that the benefits of such treatment do not compensate for the potential negative effects on patient quality of life in terms of toxicity and inconvenient dosage schedules."( Colorectal cancer--an undertreated disease.
Kemeny, N, 1996
)
" Further studies are needed to establish a standard for appropriate dosage and administration of LV."( [Biochemical modulation applied to experimental cancer chemotherapy].
Nakamura, Y, 1996
)
" The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dosage of 5-FU that achieved 60% grade 3/4 toxicity."( A phase I/II study of leucovorin, carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (LCF) in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site or advanced oesophagogastric/pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Chang, J; Cunningham, D; Gore, M; Hill, A; Hill, M; Moore, H; Nicolson, M; Norman, A; O'Brien, M; Oates, J; Rigg, A; Ross, P; Watson, M, 1997
)
" However, the toxicities observed with this dosage schedule were considerable and further studies are needed to develop a less toxic regimen."( Treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 5-FU, leucovorin, interferon-alpha-2b, and cisplatin.
Buzaid, AC; Cohen, N; Greenberg, BR; Slater, D; Sporn, JR, 1997
)
" DHAD dosage could be increased to 18 mg/m2 in 66 out of 317 cycles of chemotherapy (21%)."( Dose intensification of mitoxantrone in combination with levofolinic acid, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor support in advanced untreated breast cancer patients. A multicentric phase II study of the Southern Italy O
Caruso, M; Colucci, G; Durini, E; Gebbia, N; Gebbia, V; Giotta, F; Pezzella, G; Riccardi, F; Romito, S, 1997
)
") dolasetron dosing regimens in patients receiving their first course of high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin."( A double-blind, randomized study of two different dosage regimens of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.
Cramer, MB; Hahne, WF; Kasimis, BS; Schulman, P; Stewart, WH; Tapazoglou, E, 1997
)
" Optimal dosing and administration strategies remain to be determined."( A comprehensive review of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Machover, D, 1997
)
" However, controversy remains regarding the optimal dosing regimen."( A comprehensive review of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Machover, D, 1997
)
" In sequence, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL x min, and methotrexate 10 mg/m2, increasing in 10-mg/m2 increments, were administered on day 1 every 21 days."( Phase I trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and methotrexate with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and leucovorin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma.
Edelman, MJ; Houston, J; Lauder, I; Meyers, FJ, 1997
)
" In addition, 5-FU levels were detectable throughout the 28-day dosing period; however, there was no evidence of significant accumulation of uracil, tegafur, or 5-FU."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluations of UFT plus oral leucovorin.
Pazdur, R, 1997
)
" Dosage was reduced for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and dermatitis."( Prospectively randomized North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of intensive-course fluorouracil combined with the l-isomer of intravenous leucovorin, oral leucovorin, or intravenous leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Goldberg, RM; Hatfield, AK; Kahn, M; Knost, JA; Krook, JE; Maillard, JA; Moertel, CG; O'Connell, MJ; Sargent, DJ; Schaefer, PL; Tirona, MT; Wiesenfeld, M, 1997
)
" In rats bearing advanced colorectal tumors, the role of LV dosage was more clearly evident with the weekly 5-FU treatment schedule than with the daily schedule."( Rationale for treatment design: biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin.
Cao, S; Rustum, YM; Zhang, Z,
)
" Eight episodes of grade 3 or 4 stomatitis were observed, and were responsible for dosage modifications of MTX and 5-FU."( Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil by methotrexate and high-dose L-leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer.
Acuña, JM; Acuña, LA; Amato, S; Barbieri, MR; Cuevas, MA; DeLena, M; Dominguez, ME; Lacava, JA; Langhi, MJ; Leone, BA; Lorusso, V; Machiavelli, MR; Ortiz, EH; Perez, JE; Rodriguez, R; Romero, AO; Sabatini, CL; Salvadori, MA; Vallejo, CT, 1998
)
" A North American study (study 10) was originally set up to compare two raltitrexed dosage arms (3."( Mature results from three large controlled studies with raltitrexed ('Tomudex').
Cunningham, D, 1998
)
" These include optimization of dosing and schedule of administration, determination of the most effective oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil/folinic acid combination, definition of the role of new thymidylate synthase inhibitors with respect to oxaliplatin therapy, and identification of the most effective combinations of oxaliplatin with the new anticancer agents that have been recently introduced."( Oxaliplatin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: future directions.
Bekradda, M; Cvitkovic, E; Ducreux, M; Louvet, C, 1998
)
" Therefore toxic potentiation of 5-FU due to simultaneous 1-LV dosing is presumed to be concerned with an increased ternary complex (FdUMP-TS-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate) formation and a greater extent of TS inhibition."( Effects of levofolinate calcium on subacute intravenous toxicity of 5-fluorouracil in rats.
Fujii, H; Ichimura, A; Murakami, Y; Murata, A; Takagi, H; Tauchi, K; Yamashita, N, 1998
)
" Raltitrexed, a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, offers similar antitumoral activity together with a tolerability in comparison to standard 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy and its simple dosage schedule also contributes to better quality of life."( [Drug clinics. How I treat. II. Therapeutic approaches to metastatic colorectal cancer].
Bours, V; Fillet, G; Jerusalem, G, 1998
)
" Raltitrexed has the added convenience of an every 3 weeks dosing schedule."( Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group.
Cocconi, G; Cunningham, D; Francois, E; Gustavsson, B; Hietschold, SM; Kerr, D; Possinger, K; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, G, 1998
)
" Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored."( High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.
Bertino, JR; Densmore, CL; Fleisher, M; Grant, SC; Heelan, RT; Kris, MG; Krol, G; Miller, VA; Pfister, DG; Pisters, KM; Rigas, JR; Sirotnak, FM; Tong, W; Tyson, LB, 1996
)
" Suramin was administered for eight weeks at doses determined by means of a computer-assisted dosing algorithm that used Bayesian pharmacokinetics to maintain suramin plasma concentrations of 200-250 microg/ml."( Suramin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients resistant to 5-FU+LV-based chemotherapy.
Allegrini, G; Antonuzzo, A; Brunetti, I; Conte, PF; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Falcone, A; Galli, C; Lencioni, M; Masi, G; Pfanner, E,
)
" Weekly dosing of paclitaxel produces notable activity, while maintaining relatively low toxicity in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients."( UFT/oral calcium folinate plus weekly paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer.
Dethling, J; Kühnle, H; Lück, HJ; Scholz, U, 1999
)
"This phase I study was undertaken to define the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dosage of UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) and vinorelbine (Navelbine) in combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients who have received one prior chemotherapy regimen."( UFT plus oral calcium folinate/vinorelbine for advanced breast cancer.
Déporte-Fety, R; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P; Laguerre, B, 1999
)
" Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to toxicity."( A phase II trial of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in the treatment of invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Kantoff, PW; Loughlin, KR; Manola, J; Oh, WK; Richie, JP, 1999
)
" There is no apparent reason to change the dosing regimen of prophylactic co-trimoxazole when there is clinical evidence of damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa induced by chemotherapy."( Gastrointestinal damage induced by cytostatic treatment does not affect the bioavailability of co-trimoxazole.
Höglund, P; Johnsson, A; Ljungberg, B; Nilsson-Ehle, I; Nyhlén, A,
)
"Combination chemotherapy with multiple drugs (FLMP therapy), in which the drugs were determined based on biochemical modulation and the dosing schedule was established in accordance with the circadian rhythms of the human body, was performed in cases of advanced recurrent gastric cancer."( [Effect of combination chemotherapy with multiple drugs (FLMP therapy) based on the circadian rhythms of the human body in advanced recurrent gastric cancer].
Iesato, H; Kamoshita, N; Kato, Y; Nagaoka, H; Okabe, T; Yokomori, T, 1999
)
" Preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisted of cisplatinum combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (total dosage of 30-70 Gy)."( Analysis of postoperative complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.
Eguchi, R; Hayashi, K; Ide, H; Itoh, H; Nakamura, T; Ohta, M; Okamoto, F; Takasaki, K, 1999
)
" UFT and other oral 5FU dosing strategies make promising components of combination chemotherapy, deserving further, randomised evaluation."( Epirubicin, cisplatin and oral UFT with leucovorin ('ECU'): a phase I-II study in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.
Cresswell, H; Dent, JT; Papamichael, D; Seymour, MT; Slevin, ML; Wilson, G, 1999
)
"In the Phase I portion, paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (3-hour infusion), carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 mg/mL."( Phase I/II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and methotrexate in advanced transitional cell carcinoma: a well-tolerated regimen with activity independent of p53 mutation.
deVere White, RW; Edelman, MJ; Gandour-Edwards, R; Meyers, FJ; Miller, TR; Williams, SG, 2000
)
" The use of 5-FU pro-drugs and/or DPD inhibitors can overcome this absorption problem and allow for oral dosing of fluoropyrimidines."( Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines: a novel class of oral antineoplastic agents.
Hoff, PM; Pazdur, R, 1999
)
" A dose-response relationship was observed between the radiation dose and the tumor downstaging and local control."( Preoperative chemotherapy and pelvic radiation for tethered or fixed rectal cancer: a phase II dose escalation study.
Buie, D; Chan, AK; Heine, J; Jenken, D; Johnson, DR; Langevin, J; Wong, AO, 2000
)
" This variability makes effective dosing of 5-FU and related drugs difficult."( Oral DPD-inhibitory fluoropyrimidine drugs.
Diasio, RB, 2000
)
" The removal of one administration of vinorelbine at dose levels 3 and 4 has allowed for increased UFT dosage and AUC0-6 h of fluorouracil, with no dose-limiting toxicity reported for these patients."( UFT/leucovorin plus vinorelbine combination for advanced breast cancer.
Bonneterre, J; Déporte, R; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P, 2000
)
"The recommended oral dosage of 5-FU (10 mg/m(2) PO bid) given with eniluracil and leucovorin is approximately 115-fold lower than the reference dosage for 24-hour infusional 5-FU."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors.
Bi, DQ; Donavan, S; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; Keith, B; Monahan, BP; Morrison, G; Quinn, MG; Shapiro, J; Takimoto, CH; Zentko, S, 2000
)
" Well dosed 5 FU over a short period of time without folinic acid may be a valuable and inexpensive adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer."( Importance of 5-fluorouracil dose-intensity in a double randomised trial on adjuvant portal and systemic chemotherapy for Dukes B2 and C colorectal cancer.
Beauduin, M; Brohée, D; Bury, J; Canon, JL; Focan, C; Focan-Henrard, D; Herman, ML; Lecomte, M; Vindevoghel, A,
)
" Three different dosing regimens were investigated in phase I studies: continuous monotherapy, intermittent monotherapy, and intermittent therapy supplemented with leucovorin."( 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin versus capecitabine in patients with stage III colon cancer.
Seitz, JF, 2001
)
" These data suggest that UFT/leucovorin should not be dosed simultaneously with food."( Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin in cancer patients.
Alberts, D; Brooks, D; Damle, B; Ferreira, I; Kaul, S; Pazdur, R; Ravandi, F; Sonnichsen, D; Stewart, D, 2001
)
" Due to a high rate of gastrointestinal side-effects in the initial phase of the trial, the dosage of 5-FU was reduced to 2,200 mg/m2 for all subsequent patients."( Phase II study of weekly 24-hour intra-arterial high-dose infusion of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases from colorectal carcinomas.
Gassel, HJ; Heinrich, S; Junginger, T; Köhne, CH; Lorenz, M; Mattes, E; Mueller, HH; Saeger, HD; Schramm, H; Staib-Sebler, E; Vetter, G, 2001
)
" Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin."( A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Balbiani, L; Bella, S; Blajman, C; Cazap, E; Chacón, M; Cóppola, F; Giglio, R; Lastiri, F; Mickiewicz, E; Montiel, M; Perazzo, F; Pujol, F; Recondo, G; Richardet, E; Rodger, J; Schmilovich, A; Simon, J; Van Kooten, M; Vilanova, M; Wasserman, E; Zori Comba, A, 2001
)
" It can be concluded that the total dose of 5-FU administered is important in planned dosage schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer."( Monthly 5-days 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin for adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer.
Ahn, JB; Chung, HC; Jeung, HC; Kim, BS; Kim, NK; Min, JS; Rha, SY; Roh, JK; Shim, KY; Yoo, NC, 2001
)
" After completion of the first chemotherapy cycle, LEV was administered orally at a dosage of 150 mg per day on days 1 to 3, once every 2 weeks."( Toxicity and effects of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: results of the German prospective, controlled randomized multicenter trial FOGT-1.
Beger, HG; Link, KH; Staib, L,
)
" The dosage and administration is referred to the weekly method developed at RPMI."( [Levofolinate and fluorouracil combination therapy].
Murakami, M; Takeuchi, S, 2001
)
" Since 5-FU seems to have dual, mechanisms of cell kill; DNA and RNA directed cytotoxicity, it is important to know how to maximize or improve therapeutic ratio by dosing or scheduling 5-FU administration, even modulating 5-FU with other agents."( [5-fluorouracil].
Aiba, K, 2001
)
" The phenytoin dosage was decreased and the symptoms resolved."( Phenytoin and fluorouracil interaction.
Brodribb, TR; Gilbar, PJ, 2001
)
" Dipyridamole was administered at three different dosing schedules (DS) and methods of administration in three groups of patients."( Leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil plus dipyridamole in leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a pilot study of three different dipyridamole regimens.
Dimitrakopoulos, A; Fotiadis, K; Genatas, K; Karatzas, G; Kosmas, C; Paliaros, P; Polyzos, A; Rokana, S; Tsavaris, N; Vachiotis, P; Vadiaka, M,
)
" Capecitabine in therapeutic dosage regimens generally has acceptable tolerability."( Capecitabine: a review of its use in the treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Goa, KL; McGavin, JK, 2001
)
" As a result, both the host tolerance and antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), like 30 other anticancer drugs, vary largely according to the dosing time in laboratory rodents."( Chronotherapy of colorectal cancer.
Giacchetti, S, 2002
)
"This study determined the effect of different weekly dosing schedules of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV)/eniluracil on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and plasma uracil levels."( Impact of two weekly schedules of oral eniluracil given with fluorouracil and leucovorin on the duration of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition.
Grem, JL; Guo, XD; Harold, N; Keith, B; Quinn, M; Schuler, B; Shapiro, J; Zentko, S, 2002
)
" In addition to a more favorable safety profile, the 300 mg/m(2) dosage offered improved dose-intensity compared with the initial dosage."( Bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Amadori, D; Cruciani, G; Giovanis, P; Marangolo, M; Nicolini, M; Oliverio, G; Panzini, I; Pasquini, E; Ravaioli, A; Rossi, A; Tassinari, D; Turci, D; Zumaglini, F, 2002
)
"In this study, we propose a simple population-based Bayesian approach for predicting MTX plasma concentration from a limited number of samples, so as to adapt both duration and dosage of the rescue agent to be used next."( Bayesian population model of methotrexate to guide dosage adjustments for folate rescue in patients with breast cancer.
Bonnier, P; Ciccolini, J; Durand, A; Hadjaj, D; Lejeune, C; Merite, N; Monjanel-Mouterde, S; Piana, P, 2002
)
" The use of BIA may lead to improved dosing with FU."( Relationships between body composition parameters and fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.
Ferrari, M; Ferrazzi, E; Gusella, M; Padrini, R; Toso, S, 2002
)
" 5-FU dosage was fixed at 1,600 mg/m2 while docetaxel was evaluated at weekly 1-hour infusion dosages of 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2 to determine the MTD."( A phase I study of weekly docetaxel, 24-hour infusion of high-dose fluorouracil/leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Chang, JY; Chen, LT; Chung, TR; Jan, CM; Liu, JM; Liu, TW; Shiah, HS; Whang-Peng, J; Wu, CW, 2002
)
" At a docetaxel dosage of 50 mg/m2 per week, the dose-limiting events of grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 hypomagnesemia occurred."( A phase I study of weekly docetaxel, 24-hour infusion of high-dose fluorouracil/leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Chang, JY; Chen, LT; Chung, TR; Jan, CM; Liu, JM; Liu, TW; Shiah, HS; Whang-Peng, J; Wu, CW, 2002
)
" The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery."( Tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II trial.
Antón-Torres, A; Aparicio, J; Aranda, E; Bretón, JJ; Carrato, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Fernández-Martos, C; Navarro, M; Rivera, F; Sastre, J, 2001
)
" In order to improve the therapeutic index of systemic chemotherapy for these patients, we designed a weekly MP-HDFL protocol, which took advantage of the low toxicity of the infusional dosing schedule for cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and double biochemical modulation of 5-FU by methotrexate and leucovorin."( A phase II study of weekly methotrexate, cisplatin, and 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (MP-HDFL) in patients with metastatic and recurrent esophageal cancer-improving toxicity profile by infusional schedule and double biochemi
Bu, CF; Cheng, AL; Hsu, C; Hsu, CH; Lin, CC; Lu, YS; Yang, CH; Yeh, KH,
)
" The present results have no clinical implications for the use of capecitabine and argue against the value of therapeutic drug monitoring for dosage adjustment."( Population pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships of capecitabine metabolites in colorectal cancer patients.
Blesch, KS; Burger, HU; Gieschke, R; Reigner, B; Steimer, JL, 2003
)
" But the usage and dosage of this therapy should be further studied."( [Tolerance of human body to simultaneous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and calcium folinate].
Chen, JY; Chen, LT; Lin, Q; Peng, XZ; Zhang, H, 2003
)
"Simultaneous continuous infusion of 5-FU and CF can enhance the dosage of 5-FU, and has a better efficacy to advanced digestive tract, head and neck cancers."( [Tolerance of human body to simultaneous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and calcium folinate].
Chen, JY; Chen, LT; Lin, Q; Peng, XZ; Zhang, H, 2003
)
"To determine the toxicities and pharmacokinetic effects of eniluracil (EU) given on two weekly dosing schedules with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV)."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral eniluracil, fluorouracil and leucovorin given on a weekly schedule.
Cliatt, J; Grem, JL; Grollman, F; Guo, XD; Hamilton, JM; Harold, N; McQuigan, EA; Monahan, BP; Nguyen, D; Quinn, MG; Saif, MW; Schuler, B; Szabo, E; Takimoto, CH; Thomas, RR; Wilson, R, 2003
)
"A pharmacokinetic model for ftorafur and 5FU was developed and should be useful to further study drug interactions and establish dosing guidelines."( Modelling of ftorafur and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics following oral UFT administration. A population study in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer.
Bonneterre, J; Campone, M; Deporte-Fety, R; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Kerbrat, P; Urien, S, 2003
)
" Leucovorin (LV) dosage was fixed at 500 mg/m(2)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction.
Fleming, GF; Hong, AM; Meyerson, A; Ratain, MJ; Schilsky, RL; Schumm, LP; Vogelzang, NJ, 2003
)
" These DLTs included grade 3 fatigue (n = 3), grade 2 neutropenia precluding weekly dosing (n = 1), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and grade 3 mental status changes (n = 1)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction.
Fleming, GF; Hong, AM; Meyerson, A; Ratain, MJ; Schilsky, RL; Schumm, LP; Vogelzang, NJ, 2003
)
" The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a modified TPFL regimen (m-TPFL) for locally advanced SCCHN, consisting of a modified dosage with docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU and l-leucovorin (l-LV) designed for Japanese patients."( Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil and l-leucovorin for locally advanced head and neck cancers: a modified regimen for Japanese patients.
Sasaki, S; Taniguchi, M; Watanabe, A, 2003
)
" Because of the high impact on cost-effectiveness each more expensive chemo-therapy schedule with higher overall dosage should first prove its superior clinical efficacy."( Innovative chemotherapies for stage III colon cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.
Koperna, T; Semmler, D,
)
"Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has proven efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although the optimal dosage and administration schedule are still unclear."( Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chiara, S; Gozza, A; Heouaine, A; Lionetto, R; Nobile, MT; Pastrone, I; Percivale, PL; Rosso, R; Sanguineti, O; Taveggia, P,
)
" Eight episodes of grade II or III stomatitis were observed and were responsible for dosage modifications of TMTX and 5-FU."( Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil by trimetrexate and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Bologna, F; Dominguez, ME; Lacava, JA; Leone, BA; Machiavelli, MR; Ortiz, EH; Pérez, JE; Romero, AO; Salum, G; Vallejo, CT, 2004
)
"We evaluated the optimal dosage schedule for combined oral chemotherapy using uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) in Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats."( Preliminary study of the optimal dosing schedule for oral UFT/leucovorin chemotherapy.
Ishikawa, K; Kamijo, A; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Nakamura, T; Sadahiro, S; Saguchi, T; Suzuki, T; Yasuda, S,
)
"Administration of UFT/LV for 5 days of the week seemed to exhibit superior antitumor activity, with no increase in the incidence of adverse effects, as compared with the consecutive daily dosing schedule."( Preliminary study of the optimal dosing schedule for oral UFT/leucovorin chemotherapy.
Ishikawa, K; Kamijo, A; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Nakamura, T; Sadahiro, S; Saguchi, T; Suzuki, T; Yasuda, S,
)
" Leucovorin dosage was adjusted according to creatinine clearance."( High-dose methotrexate therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: lack of relation between serum methotrexate concentration and creatinine clearance.
Campbell, M; Joannon, P; Oviedo, I; Tordecilla, J, 2004
)
" Dosage was reduced at any time if toxicity NCI CTC grade III/IV was observed."( Irinotecan plus folinic acid/continuous 5-fluorouracil as simplified bimonthly FOLFIRI regimen for first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Adami, B; Galle, PR; Heike, M; Hohl, H; Höhler, T; Klein, O; Moehler, M; Schroeder, M; Siebler, J; Steinmann, S; Teufel, A; Zanke, C, 2004
)
"Prednisone dosage (25 mg/d) was tapered to 0 mg/d within 24 weeks and was adjusted if flare-ups occurred."( Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Caporali, R; Cimmino, MA; Ferraccioli, G; Gerli, R; Klersy, C; Montecucco, C; Salvarani, C, 2004
)
"Follow-up was short, and a high dose of folinic acid and a relatively high starting dosage of prednisone were used."( Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Caporali, R; Cimmino, MA; Ferraccioli, G; Gerli, R; Klersy, C; Montecucco, C; Salvarani, C, 2004
)
" The results of growth curve analyses replicated these findings and suggested a significant adverse effect of cumulative dosage of intrathecal methotrexate on estimated Wechsler Performance IQ."( Cognitive changes in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy only according to the Pediatric Oncology Group 9605 protocol.
Barrowman, NJ; Dunlap, H; Halton, JM; Hsu, E; Keene, DL; Kuehn, SM; Matzinger, MA; Montour-Proulx, I, 2005
)
"The incidence of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related cardiotoxicity seems to be dosage and schedule dependent."( Cardiotoxicity of de Gramont's regimen: incidence, clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up.
Alakavuklar, MN; Barutca, S; Kundak, I; Meydan, N; Oztop, I; Yavuzsen, T; Yilmaz, U, 2005
)
" Morbidity is a significant limitation of this procedure, usually related to the extent of surgery, and hematological toxicity, which is considered as dependent upon the chemotherapy dosage alone."( Impact of the extent and duration of cytoreductive surgery on postoperative hematological toxicity after intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Boige, V; Elias, D; Estphan, G; Laplanche, A; Malka, D; Pocard, M; Raynard, B, 2005
)
" Recent treatment schedules vary markedly in terms of timing, dosing and scheduling of MTX and/or leukovorin, which may leave us uncertain with ideas such as "how should we best use HDMTX and LV?" or "why are we still using such by industry recommended doses of MTX?" The answer of how best to incorporate HDMTX and/or LV into ALL treatment plans is still not known and further clinical and pharmacological studies dealing with still controversial systemic MTX issue are actual even now, after more than 5 decades of clinical experiences with the MTX in pediatric oncology."( High-dose methotrexate and/or leucovorin rescue for the treatment of children with lymphoblastic malignancies: do we really know why, when and how?
Bajciová, V; Gregorová, V; Kadlecová, V; Mendelová, D; Sterba, J; Valík, D, 2005
)
" In the high 5-FU group, seven of 14 patients (50%) received < or =80% of the planned chemotherapy dose during the first cycle due to dosage reductions whilst treatment delays occurred in 10/14 patients."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
" A decrease of dosage or abundance of continuation was done during the course due to complications."( [Five cases of locally advanced rectal cancer or local recurrence performed intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy via the internal iliac artery].
Agata, T; Aoyama, H; Funabashi, M; Hanai, T; Kamano, T; Katsuno, H; Koide, Y; Maeda, K; Masumori, K; Noro, T; Sato, H, 2005
)
" The treatment schedule modification, omitting the 5-FU dosing on day 8, considerably improved treatment compliance, reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and asthenia."( Irinotecan, oxaliplatin plus bolus 5-fluorouracil and low dose folinic acid every 2 weeks: a feasibility study in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Bas, C; Bella, S; Chacon, M; Coppola, F; Escobar, E; Hidalgo, J; Korbenfeld, E; Martin, C; Martinez, J; Reale, M; Richardet, E; Senna, S; Smilovich, AM; Wasserman, E, 2006
)
" 5-fluoruracil 750 mg sq m(-1), leucovorin 75 mg sq m(-1), epirubicin 45 mg sq m(-1), carboplatin 225 mg sq m(-1) were administered every 3 weeks into celiac axis for three cycles (FLEC regimen), then gemcitabine at the dosage of 1 g sq m(-1) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for 3 months (FLECG regimen)."( Adjuvant intra-arterial 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin and carboplatin with or without systemic gemcitabine after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Cantore, M; Capelli, P; Fiorentini, G; Iacono, C; Lombardi, M; Mambrini, A; Pacetti, P; Pagani, M; Pederzoli, P; Pulica, C; Serio, G; Torri, T, 2006
)
" The dose intensity of gemcitabine of the 35 patients with 5-FU dosage set at MTD was 593 mg/m2 per week."( Phase I-II trial of weekly gemcitabine plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer.
Chang, JY; Chao, Y; Chen, LT; Cheng, AL; Chuang, TR; Hsu, C; Hsu, CH; Jan, CM; Liu, TW; Shiah, HS; Whang-Peng, J; Yu, WL, 2006
)
"In this study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of decreasing dosage of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer."( Decreasing dosage of irinotecan, 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Chueh, TC; Huang, JS; Lai, CH; Lan, YJ; Liaw, CC; Wang, CH; Yen, CL; You, YT,
)
"Palifermin administered at the indicated dosing regimen (40 microg/kg for 3 consecutive days) before chemotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the incidence of WHO grade 2 or higher OM in patients with metastatic CRC."( Palifermin reduces the incidence of oral mucositis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.
Abdi, E; Cesano, A; Chen, MG; Clarke, S; Davis, ID; Gayko, U; Gutheil, J; Rosen, LS; Schnell, FM; Zalcberg, J, 2006
)
" The proposed model could be used in Bayesian algorithms with a limited sampling strategy to estimate the systemic exposure of individual patients to methotrexate and adapt both folinic acid rescue and methotrexate dosing accordingly."( Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Aumente, D; Buelga, DS; García, MJ; Gomez, P; Lukas, JC; Torres, A, 2006
)
" We also performed a dose-response study with folinic acid and determined the impact of maternal folate supplementation on Folr1 nullizygous cardiac development."( Cardiovascular abnormalities in Folr1 knockout mice and folate rescue.
Finnell, RH; Gelineau-van Waes, J; Merriweather, M; Schwartz, RJ; Scott, M; Wlodarczyk, BJ; Yu, W; Zhu, H, 2007
)
"Our study shows that low LBM is a significant predictor of toxicity in female patients administered 5-FU using the convention of dosing per unit of body surface area."( Body composition as an independent determinant of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy toxicity.
Baracos, VE; Butts, CA; McCargar, LJ; Mourtzakis, M; Mulder, KE; Prado, CM; Reiman, T; Sawyer, MB; Scarfe, AG, 2007
)
" We were unable to demonstrate a significant dose-response relationship for renal damage in the tested dose range."( Renal toxicity of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in gastric cancer.
Belka, C; Bokemeyer, C; Budach, W; Hehr, T; Kollmannsberger, C; Welz, S, 2007
)
" The dosing regimen recommended in clinic trial is 8 mg/m(2)."( [10-hydroxy-camptothecin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer].
Cai, RG; Chen, SS; Chu, DT; Wu, F; Zhang, HG, 2007
)
" The dosage of FOLFOX 4 was reduced after three courses due to neutropenia and diarrhea."( [A patient with recurrent rectal cancer in whom pulmonary metastasis disappeared by FOLFOX 4 therapy].
Fujisawa, M; Ishibiki, Y; Ishiyama, S; Kitabatake, T; Kojima, K; Machida, M; Nakayama, Y; Nitta, S; Ono, S; Shinjou, K; Urao, M, 2007
)
"Cisplatin (DDP) in large dosage impairs renal functions, while the impact of fractionated low dose DDP on renal functions is unclear."( [Effects of fractionated low dose Cisplatin on renal functions of patients with gastric carcinoma].
Jin, ML; Li, J; Li, Y; Shen, L, 2007
)
" Although this patient could accept it relatively safely without any severe side effect, the optimal dosage and the timing of hemodialysis for inoperable metastatic colorectal cancer patients should be determined by a further study using more cases."( [Modified FOLFOX6 in a patient on hemodialysis with metastatic colorectal cancer].
Ehara, K; Hasebe, S; Hashimoto, M; Hayashi, M; Igarashi, M; Ito, T; Katori, H; Kinoshita, Y; Matoba, S; Matsuda, M; Mine, S; Moriyama, J; Sato, M; Sawada, T; Toda, S; Tsutsumi, K; Udagawa, H; Ueno, M; Watanabe, G; Yokoyama, T, 2008
)
"A phase III, multicenter, randomized study compared conventional dosing of fluorouracil (FU) plus folinic acid with pharmacokinetically guided FU dose adjustment in terms of response, tolerability, and survival."( Individual fluorouracil dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic follow-up compared with conventional dosage: results of a multicenter randomized trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Delva, R; Dorval, E; Gamelin, E; Jacob, J; Merrouche, Y; Morel, A; Pezet, D; Piot, G; Raoul, JL, 2008
)
" Those centres that did not use routine dosing of folinic acid post transplant chose not to do so on the grounds that they believed that it was not efficacious or may increase the risk of GVHD."( Folinic acid administration following MTX as prophylaxis for GVHD in allogeneic HSCT centres in Australia and New Zealand.
Bhurani, D; Kerridge, I; Schifter, M, 2008
)
" The setting of dosage was differed in two hospitals."( [Comparative survey on current status and the differences of treatment using modified FOLFOX6 regimen in patients with colorectal cancer in two general hospitals].
Anami, S; Fujii, C; Fukunaga, M; Furukawa, H; Kitada, N; Morimoto, S; Morita, S; Takara, K; Watari, M; Yamasaki, H; Yokoyama, T, 2008
)
" In contrast, a similar dosing regimen but at a lower dose (0."( Damaging effects of chronic low-dose methotrexate usage on primary bone formation in young rats and potential protective effects of folinic acid supplementary treatment.
Cool, JC; Fan, C; Foster, BK; Scherer, MA; Shandala, T; Tapp, H; Xian, CJ, 2009
)
" Capecitabine was given at an oral dosage of 825 mg/m(2)bid on each day of the radiotherapy period with the first daily dose applied 2 h before irradiation, followed by surgery 6 weeks later."( Neoadjuvant capecitabine combined with standard radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: mature results of a phase II trial.
Budach, W; Debus, J; Dunst, J; Hinke, A; Hoelscher, T; Mose, S; Reese, T; Roedel, C; Rudat, V; Wulf, J; Zuehlke, H, 2008
)
" The dosing regimen was continued up to 10 weeks."( Methotrexate-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in germ cells of mice: intervention of folic and folinic acid.
Jena, GB; Padmanabhan, S; Ramarao, P; Tripathi, DN; Vikram, A, 2009
)
" Prospective trials are required to assess whether dosing adjustments based on neutropaenia may improve chemotherapy efficacy."( Neutropaenia as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with first-line FOLFOX.
Inaba, Y; Matsuo, K; Muro, K; Najima, M; Sato, Y; Shitara, K; Takahari, D; Ura, T; Yamaura, H; Yokota, T, 2009
)
"Etoposide 50 mg/m(2), UFT 250 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 90 mg (fixed dose) were dosed in 3 gifts approximately 8h apart for 14 days followed by 1 week rest every 3 weeks until progressive disease (PD)."( Oral UFT, etoposide and leucovorin in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: a non-randomized phase II study.
Aerts, JG; Gras, J; Hoogsteden, H; Pouw, E; Pronk, T; Salomé, J; Schmitz, PI; Surmont, V; Tan, KY; van Klaveren, RJ; Vernhout, R, 2009
)
" Additionally, no dosage decrease was required, and only 4 cycles were withheld for 1 week because of neutropenia."( Efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.
Hatzopoulos, A; Heras, P; Karagiannis, S; Kritikos, K; Kritikos, N; Mitsibounas, D; Xourafas, V,
)
" Alternative vorinostat dosing schedules may be needed for optimal down-regulation of TS expression."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.
Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Fakih, MG; Fetterly, G; Holleran, JL; Litwin, A; Pendyala, L; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Toth, K; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
" Of the total 368 cycles administered, 68 suffered administration delays and 22 had the dosage reduced."( [Therapeutic use and profile of toxicity of the FOLFOX4 regimen].
de la Rubia, A; Díaz-Carrasco, MS; Fernández-Lobato, B; Marín, M; Pareja, A; Vila, N,
)
"The use of the FOLFOX4 regimen has been adjusted to uses with some solid scientific evidence, but its toxicity has limited its use and has made administering the planned dosage levels difficult."( [Therapeutic use and profile of toxicity of the FOLFOX4 regimen].
de la Rubia, A; Díaz-Carrasco, MS; Fernández-Lobato, B; Marín, M; Pareja, A; Vila, N,
)
" The CPT-11 dosage was 150 mg/m(2)."( [Two cases of advanced colorectal cancer with UGT1A1*28 homozygosity treated by FOLFIRI].
Fukuoka, T; Hatano, N; Imamura, Y; Morita, Y; Usui, H; Yokoyama, S, 2009
)
" CoFactor was developed as a more active replacement of leucovorin to potentially allow reduced dosing of 5-FU."( Resection of hepatic metastasis after 5-fluorouracil and cofactor for colon cancer.
Bouvet, M; Costantini, CL; Reid, TR,
)
" But even with an 85 mg/m(2) dose, mFOLFOX6 therapy could be continued by extending the dosing interval."( [The pharmacokinetics and safety of oxaliplatin in a hemodialysis patient treated with mFOLFOX6 therapy].
Fujita, M; Kataoka, Y; Katayama, T; Koide, T; Matsuda, H; Okuda, M; Yamagishi, Y, 2009
)
" Several forms of folate appear to be safe and efficacious in some individuals with major depressive disorder, but more information is needed about dosage and populations most suited to folate therapy."( Folate in depression: efficacy, safety, differences in formulations, and clinical issues.
Fava, M; Mischoulon, D, 2009
)
"FOLFOX4 (SWIFT1) and mFOLFOX6 (SWIFT2) regimens complying with the international standard dosage and schedule can also be administered safely and effectively in Japan."( Multicenter phase II study of FOLFOX for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Japan; SWIFT-1 and 2 study.
Ikenaga, M; Kato, T; Kondo, K; Mishima, H; Nagata, N; Nakao, A; Oba, K; Okuyama, Y; Sakamoto, J; Shibata, Y; Tanemura, H,
)
"9%, respectively, compared with dosing on an empty stomach."( Effects of a low-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer.
Furuhata, T; Hosokawa, Y; Ishiyama, G; Iwayama, Y; Kimura, Y; Meguro, M; Mizuguchi, T; Nishidate, T; Okita, K; Sasaki, K; Tsuruma, T, 2009
)
" As the drug is orally administered, capecitabine permits greater convenience and flexibility in dosing by eliminating the need for continuous infusion and its potential complications."( Dosing considerations for capecitabine-irinotecan regimens in the treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced colorectal cancer.
Boehm, KA; Cartwright, T; McCollum, D, 2010
)
" When chemotherapy with S-1 or UFT/LV started from the micrometastasis stage, not the advanced macroscopic metastasis stage, anti-LNM efficacy of S-1 was significantly higher than that of UFT/LV at the dosage in which antitumor activity of the two drugs against primary subcutaneous tumor was comparable."( Characterization of a novel lymph node metastasis model from human colonic cancer and its preclinical use for comparison of anti-metastatic efficacy between oral S-1 and UFT/ LV.
Hirai, T; Ito, Y; Kato, T; Kodera, Y; Nakanishi, H; Nakao, A, 2010
)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of calcium folinate (CF) applied in 10% of the methotrexate (MTX) dosage against morphologic and steroid-receptor damage induced by MTX in rat endosalpinx."( Protective effect of calcium folinate against methotrexate-induced endosalpinx damage in rats.
Chen, YP; Wang, HC; Yang, XJ; Zhao, J; Zheng, FY, 2011
)
" The regimen of pre-op CCRT was a radiation dosage of 45  Gy in 20 fractions and oral tegafur-uracil (UFUR) and leucovorin."( The impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on advanced low rectal cancer.
Chang, SC; Chen, WS; Jiang, JK; Kao, PS; Lee, RC; Liang, WY; Lin, JK; Lin, TC; Wang, HS; Wang, LW; Yang, SH, 2010
)
" The review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of this drug, alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and/or new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer patients."( Update on capecitabine alone and in combination regimens in colorectal cancer patients.
Azzariti, A; Cinieri, S; Colucci, G; De Vita, F; Lorusso, V; Maiello, E; Millaku, A; Numico, G; Petriella, D; Pisconti, S; Russo, A; Santini, D; Silvestris, N; Tommasi, S, 2010
)
" The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of a clinical decision support system and Bayesian forecasting algorithm in the prediction of MTX concentrations and assessment of LV dosing requirements in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer based on the current practice at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia."( Evaluating performance of a decision support system to improve methotrexate pharmacotherapy in children and young adults with cancer.
Barrett, JS; Dombrowsky, E; Jayaraman, B; Narayan, M, 2011
)
" Despite this, 150 mg/m(2) CPT is widely prescribed and is the maximum dosage covered by Japanese health insurance."( Retrospective analysis of the international standard-dose FOLFIRI (plus bevacizumab) regimen in Japanese patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma.
Akutsu, N; Fujii, H; Hamamoto, Y; Miyamoto, J; Nagase, M; Nishi, T; Warita, E; Yamanaka, Y, 2011
)
"5 and 50 mg/day) and continuous daily dosing (CDD; 37."( A phase I study of sunitinib in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aranda, E; Carrato, A; Chau, I; Countouriotis, AM; Cunningham, D; Guillen-Ponce, C; Iveson, TJ; Ramos, FJ; Ruiz-Garcia, A; Saunders, MP; Starling, N; Tabernero, J; Tursi, JM; Vázquez-Mazón, F; Wei, G, 2012
)
"FOLFOX plus bevacizumab therapy can be given safely to hemodialytic patients with no reduction in the dose of oxaliplatin if hemodialysis is performed soon after the administration of oxaliplatin and the dosing interval is extended to 3 weeks."( Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin in a hemodialytic patient treated with modified FOLFOX-6 plus bevacizumab therapy.
Chiba, T; Ezoe, Y; Horimatsu, T; Mashimo, Y; Miyamoto, S; Morita, S; Muto, M, 2011
)
" Concomitant 5-FU/LCV resulted in no clinically relevant changes in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval (AUC(0-12)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of sorafenib (100-400 mg bid) at steady state."( Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced solid tumors.
Atsmon, J; Brendel, E; Bulocinic, S; Figer, A; Geva, R; Nalbandyan, K; Shacham-Shmueli, E; Shpigel, S, 2012
)
"5, and 50 mg/day) on three schedules: 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off (2/2); 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off (4/2); or continuous daily dosing (CDD)."( A phase I study of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Camidge, DR; Chan, E; Chow Maneval, E; Diab, S; Eckhardt, SG; Khosravan, R; Leong, S; Lin, X; Lockhart, AC; Messersmith, WA; Spratlin, J, 2012
)
" standard body-surface-area (BSA) dosing in a FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Individual fluorouracil dose adjustment in FOLFOX based on pharmacokinetic follow-up compared with conventional body-area-surface dosing: a phase II, proof-of-concept study.
Asevoaia, A; Boisdron-Celle, M; Capitain, O; Gamelin, E; Morel, A; Poirier, AL, 2012
)
"Efficacy and tolerability of PK-adjusted FOLFOX dosing was much higher than traditional BSA dosing in agreement with previous reports for 5-FU monotherapy PK-adjusted dosing."( Individual fluorouracil dose adjustment in FOLFOX based on pharmacokinetic follow-up compared with conventional body-area-surface dosing: a phase II, proof-of-concept study.
Asevoaia, A; Boisdron-Celle, M; Capitain, O; Gamelin, E; Morel, A; Poirier, AL, 2012
)
"The efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab every 2 or 4 weeks using the same dosage in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI were retrospectively evaluated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in the first-line and second-line therapy."( Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Buyukberber, S; Ciltas, A; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Dikilitas, M; Dogu, GG; Durnali, AG; Kaplan, MA; Karaca, H; Ozkan, M; Sevinc, A; Yetisyigit, T; Yildiz, R, 2012
)
" However, our study clearly points out the need for determination of optimum biological dosing interval of bevacizumab in well-designed, prospective, randomized trials."( Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Buyukberber, S; Ciltas, A; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Dikilitas, M; Dogu, GG; Durnali, AG; Kaplan, MA; Karaca, H; Ozkan, M; Sevinc, A; Yetisyigit, T; Yildiz, R, 2012
)
" Data on folinic acid dosage and duration were analyzed along with SCT parameters using univariate and multivariate statistics."( Folinic acid supplementation in higher doses is associated with graft rejection in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Harila-Saari, A; Lindqvist, H; Remberger, M; Sundin, M; Winiarski, J, 2013
)
" The cost of drug acquisition was calculated based on dosage data and the mean number of treatment cycles from the pivotal studies NO16966 and NO16967."( Pharmaco-economic analysis of direct medical costs of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy with XELOX or modified FOLFOX-6 regimens: implications for health-care utilization in Australia.
Gibbs, P; Hack, SP; Kerr, A; Price, T; Stokes, L; Todd, C; Tran, G, 2013
)
" We designed a pilot study in order to explore the optimal dosing period for indisetron during modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6)."( Optimal dose period for indisetron tablets for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with modified FOLFOX6: a randomized pilot study.
Asaka, M; Kato, K; Komatsu, Y; Kudo, M; Meguro, T; Miyagishima, T; Muto, S; Nakatsumi, H; Oba, K; Sogabe, S; Tateyama, M; Uebayashi, M; Yuki, S, 2012
)
"43) with conventionally dosed therapy."( Between-course targeting of methotrexate exposure using pharmacokinetically guided dosage adjustments.
Cheng, C; Crews, KR; Evans, WE; Howard, SC; Jeha, S; McCormick, J; Panetta, JC; Pauley, JL; Pei, D; Pui, CH; Relling, MV; Ribeiro, R; Rubnitz, J; Sandlund, JT, 2013
)
" The experimental arm's dosage schedule was paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 (intravenous infusion) on days 1, 8 and 15 and S-1 80-120 mg/d (oral administration) on days 1-14."( A multicentre randomised trial comparing weekly paclitaxel + S-1 with weekly paclitaxel + 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Ba, Y; Deng, T; Guo, Z; Hu, C; Huang, D; Meng, J; Wan, H; Wang, M; Xiong, J; Xu, N; Yan, Z; Yao, Y; Yu, Z; Zhang, Y; Zheng, R; Zhuang, Z, 2013
)
"Traditional post-surgical chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is notorious for its devastating side effects due to the high dosage required."( Drug-eluting scaffold to deliver chemotherapeutic medication for management of pancreatic cancer after surgery.
Chen, H; Deng, X; Jin, J; Li, H; Peng, C; Shen, B; Zhan, Q; Zhang, X, 2013
)
" We started combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin and oxaliplatin(modified FOLFOX6)at a 20% lower than standard dosage for safety."( [A case of metastatic colorectal cancer with icterus due to multiple liver metastases treated effectively by FOLFOX plus bevacizumab].
Fukuda, K; Koja, S; Terasawa, T; Yasuda, K, 2013
)
"5 or 9 mg/kg/d given on days 1 to 3 of each 14-day cycle along with standard dosing of modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab."( A phase 1B study of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ashkenazi, A; Kapp, AV; Kozloff, MF; Messersmith, WA; Peddi, PF; Portera, CC; Royer-Joo, S; Wainberg, ZA, 2013
)
" The subsequent 14 patients were treated with a dulanermin dosage of 9 mg/kg/d."( A phase 1B study of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ashkenazi, A; Kapp, AV; Kozloff, MF; Messersmith, WA; Peddi, PF; Portera, CC; Royer-Joo, S; Wainberg, ZA, 2013
)
"6%) while 5 patients had extended-interval dosage (17."( Two-week combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, high-dose folinic acid and 5 fluorouracil (GEMFUFOL) as first-line treatment of metastatic biliary tract cancers.
Oztop, I; Unal, OU; Unek, IT; Yilmaz, AU, 2013
)
" With current dosing regimens, axitinib plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI seems to be less well tolerated than bevacizumab-based regimens."( Axitinib or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or modified FOLFOX-6 after failure of first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study.
Barone, C; Bendell, JC; Bloom, J; Kim, JG; Kim, S; Pastorelli, D; Pericay, C; Ricart, AD; Rosbrook, B; Sobrero, AF; Swieboda-Sadlej, A; Tarazi, J; Tournigand, C; Wainberg, ZA, 2013
)
"We evaluated week-on/week-off axitinib dosing plus chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal tumours, including tumour thymidine uptake by fluorine-18 3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography ((18)FLT-PET)."( Intermittent dosing of axitinib combined with chemotherapy is supported by (18)FLT-PET in gastrointestinal tumours.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Hoh, CK; Infante, JR; Kim, S; Reid, TR; Rosbrook, B; Tarazi, J, 2014
)
") axitinib 7 mg (n=3) or 10 mg (n=18) for 7 days followed by a 7-day dosing interruption; serial (18)FLT-PET scans were performed before day 1 and on days 7, 10, and 14."( Intermittent dosing of axitinib combined with chemotherapy is supported by (18)FLT-PET in gastrointestinal tumours.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Hoh, CK; Infante, JR; Kim, S; Reid, TR; Rosbrook, B; Tarazi, J, 2014
)
"3%); alteration and complete recovery (31%) or sustained deterioration (45%), possibly due to inadequate chronotherapy dosing and/or timing."( The circadian rest-activity rhythm, a potential safety pharmacology endpoint of cancer chemotherapy.
Beau, J; Innominato, PF; Iurisci, I; Karaboue, A; Lévi, F; Madrid, JA; Moreau, T; Ortiz-Tudela, E; Rol, MA, 2014
)
"An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample."( Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT.
Alberts, S; Ansari, R; Childs, BH; Chowhan, N; Grothey, A; Hainsworth, JD; Hart, L; Hochster, HS; Keaton, M; Ramanathan, RK; Rowland, K, 2014
)
"Oral UFT plus leucovorin given by either dosage schedule is a very safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy."( Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial.
Baba, H; Hamada, C; Kakeji, Y; Katsumata, K; Koda, K; Kodaira, S; Kondo, K; Matsuoka, J; Morita, T; Nishimura, G; Sadahiro, S; Saji, S; Sasaki, K; Sato, S; Tsuchiya, T; Usuki, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 2014
)
" Sequential blood samples were collected at regular intervals over 24 h after dosing and were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method."( Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of disodium folinate following single intravenous doses in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label, randomized, single-center study.
Li, Y; Li, Z; Liu, Y; Shi, S; Wu, J; Yang, C; Zhang, Y; Zhou, J, 2015
)
" A common dosage of leucovorin in adjuvant and palliative settings is 60 mg/m(2)."( Folate levels measured by LC-MS/MS in patients with colorectal cancer treated with different leucovorin dosages.
Derwinger, K; Odin, E; Taflin, H; Wettergren, Y, 2014
)
" Further studies are needed to establish whether higher dosage yields a better treatment response."( Folate levels measured by LC-MS/MS in patients with colorectal cancer treated with different leucovorin dosages.
Derwinger, K; Odin, E; Taflin, H; Wettergren, Y, 2014
)
" A randomized trial showed increased OS and decreased toxicity with PK-guided compared with BSA-based 5-FU dosing in patients with mCRC."( Cost effectiveness analysis of pharmacokinetically-guided 5-fluorouracil in FOLFOX chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ayer, T; Chen, Q; El-Rayes, BF; Flowers, CR; Goldstein, DA; Harvey, RD; Howard, DH; Lipscomb, J, 2014
)
"Thirty-two patients scheduled for colon resection were randomized to receive Modufolin® or Isovorin® at dosage of 60 or 200 mg/m²."( A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of Modufolin® compared to Isovorin® after single dose intravenous administration to patients with colon cancer: a randomized study.
Derwinger, K; Kodeda, K; Odin, E; Taflin, H; Wettergren, Y, 2015
)
"Seven patients with metastases confined to the liver were included and stratified into two groups, depending of dosage of systemic chemotherapy."( Fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan combined with intra-arterial hepatic infusion of drug-eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan in unresectable colorectal liver metastases: side effects and results of a concomitant treatment schedule. Clinical inves
Badzek, S; Golem, H; Gorsic, I; Kekez, D; Librenjak, N; Perkov, D; Plestina, S; Prejac, J; Smiljanic, R,
)
"The efficacy of the biweekly combination of cetuximab with FOLFOX-4 in patients with wild-type KRAS tumours supports the administration of cetuximab in a dosing regimen more convenient for patients and healthcare providers."( Biweekly cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of a phase II, open-label, clinical trial (OPTIMIX-ACROSS Study).
Alonso, V; Cirera, L; Fernandez-Plana, J; Mendez, M; Pericay, C; Quintero, G; Saigi, E; Salgado, M; Salud, A, 2014
)
" Future strategies should focus on investigating the immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy in conjunction with TroVax, understanding the optimal dosing and schedule of the combination, and examining potential predictive biomarkers to determine which patients may benefit from immunotherapy from those who do not."( TroVax in colorectal cancer.
Cen, P; Rowe, J, 2014
)
" Rescue dosage of leucovorin in variant group was higher than that in wild-type group [(312."( [SLCO1B1c. 521T>C gene polymorphisms are associated with high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Chen, Y; Gao, P; He, X; Li, J; Niu, C; Wang, C; Wang, Y; Zhang, H, 2014
)
" Standard dosage of mFOLFOX6 was used."( Endostar in combination with modified FOLFOX6 as an initial therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a phase I clinical trial.
Cao, J; Chen, Z; Guo, W; Ji, D; Li, J; Li, W; Lv, F; Qiu, L; Wang, J; Xia, Z; Zhang, S; Zhang, W, 2015
)
" This report explores the relationship between glucarpidase dosage and patient outcomes in pediatric oncology patients."( Comparable efficacy with varying dosages of glucarpidase in pediatric oncology patients.
Cheng, C; Crews, KR; Jeha, S; Molinelli, AR; Navid, F; Relling, MV; Scott, JR; Stewart, CF; Swanson, HD; Ward, DA; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
"No significant relationship was found between glucarpidase dosage (units/kg) and percent decrease in methotrexate plasma concentrations measured by TDx (P > 0."( Comparable efficacy with varying dosages of glucarpidase in pediatric oncology patients.
Cheng, C; Crews, KR; Jeha, S; Molinelli, AR; Navid, F; Relling, MV; Scott, JR; Stewart, CF; Swanson, HD; Ward, DA; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
" An adaptive reduction in chemotherapy dosage was required in 2 patients due to hematological toxicity, and a delay in chemotherapy cycles was required for 3 patients."( FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as a second-line therapy for metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Bengrine, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Guion-Dusserre, JF; Lorgis, V; Vincent, J, 2015
)
" The median total dosage of oxaliplatin was 811."( Initial safety report on the tolerability of modified FOLFOX6 as adjuvant therapy in patients with curatively resected stage II or III colon cancer (JFMC41-1001-C2: JOIN trial).
Goto, K; Hasegawa, J; Inoue, K; Ishigure, K; Kotaka, M; Manaka, D; Matsui, T; Oba, K; Ohtsu, A; Saji, S; Sakamoto, J; Shinozaki, K; Touyama, T; Watanabe, T; Yoshino, T, 2015
)
" No difference in other treatment toxicity was observed between the two groups, and patients exhibited high compliance in dosing administration."( Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (Hangeshashinto) for infusional fluorinated-pyrimidine-based colorectal cancer chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis.
Aoyama, T; Kataoka, M; Kono, T; Matsuda, C; Mishima, H; Morita, S; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Oshiro, M; Sakamoto, J, 2015
)
" During HIPEC in Colliseum technique Oxaliplatin was given in a dosage of 200 mg/m2 and Docetaxel in a dosage of 80 mg/m2."( Systemic Chemotherapy using FLOT - Regimen Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery plus HIPEC for Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasized Gastric Cancer. .
Hotopp, T; Müller, H; Tofeili, A; Wutke, K, 2014
)
"Because the serum concentration of 5-FU fluctuates and displays various patterns, the dosage should not be based on body surface area."( Fluctuation in Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Concentration During Continuous 5-Fluorouracil Infusion for Colorectal Cancer.
Higashida, M; Hirai, T; Kubota, H; Matsumoto, H; Murakami, H; Okumura, H; Tohyama, K; Tsuruta, A, 2015
)
" Spatially defined projected light photopolymerization of hydrogels with embedded active compounds is introduced as a flexible and cost-efficient method for producing multiplexed dosing assays."( Multiplexed Dosing Assays by Digitally Definable Hydrogel Volumes.
Andresen, TL; Chernyy, S; Faralli, A; Larsen, EK; Larsen, NB; Melander, F, 2016
)
" Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin could be economically reasonable if full dosing occurred ≥76% of the time (base case 42%)."( Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
Aspinall, SL; Chatta, G; Cunningham, FE; Good, CB; Passero, V; Smith, KJ; Soni, A; Zhao, X, 2014
)
"Adverse events seen with chemotherapy consisted of grade 2 leukopenia in 1 patient, but there were no cases of delayed administration or dosage reduction due to grade 2 neurotoxicity."( Evaluation of Preoperative Chemotherapy with Modified OPTIMOX-1 Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer with Factors Contraindicative of Curative Surgery.
Arimitsu, H; Hirano, A; Koda, K; Kosugi, C; Matsuo, K; Shiragami, R; Shuto, K; Suzuki, M; Tanaka, K; Yamazaki, M; Yasuda, H, 2015
)
"To (a) assess potential patient-specific factors related to adherence to mCRC chemotherapy regimens and (b) compare adherence with IV versus oral dosage forms."( Factors Associated with Adherence Rates for Oral and Intravenous Anticancer Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Anderson, S; Seal, BS; Shermock, KM, 2016
)
" The median cumulative dosage capecitabine was lower for patients treated with CAPOX (163,744 mg/m(2), interquartile range [IQR] 83,397-202,858 mg/m(2)) than for patients treated with CapMono (189,195 mg/m(2), IQR 111,667-228,125 mg/m(2), P = 0."( Intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and grade III-V toxicities among elderly stage III colon cancer patients.
Creemers, GJ; Janssen-Heijnen, ML; Lemmens, VE; Maas, HA; Pruijt, JF; Razenberg, LG; van Erning, FN, 2016
)
"CAPOX is associated with significantly more grade III-V toxicities than CapMono, which had a pronounced impact on the cumulative dosage received and completion of all planned cycles."( Intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and grade III-V toxicities among elderly stage III colon cancer patients.
Creemers, GJ; Janssen-Heijnen, ML; Lemmens, VE; Maas, HA; Pruijt, JF; Razenberg, LG; van Erning, FN, 2016
)
" This relationship favors new treatment strategies with white blood cell growth factors or chemotherapy dosing based on muscle value."( Sarcopenia is Associated with Chemotherapy Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer.
Ammari, S; Antoun, S; Bayar, MA; Chemama, S; Elias, D; Goéré, D; Lanoy, E; Raynard, B; Stoclin, A, 2016
)
" We propose that changes in dosing procedures could improve the delivery and therapeutic index for methotrexate and other folic acid-targeted drug conjugates and imaging agents."( Folate binding protein: therapeutic natural nanotechnology for folic acid, methotrexate, and leucovorin.
Banaszak Holl, MM; Boutom, SM; Chen, J; Frey, C; Marsh, EN; Merzel, RL; Shedden, K, 2017
)
" Potential correlation between treatment modalities (regimen, dosage and route of administration of L-OHP, and injection timing for dexamethasone administration) and HSRs was assessed."( Comparison between hypersensitivity reactions to cycles of modified FOLFOX6 and XELOX therapies in patients with colorectal cancer.
Ando, Y; Hayashi, T; Ikeda, Y; Ito, K; Kawada, K; Kumazawa, S; Maeda, K; Matsuoka, H; Murai, S; Ohta, H; Shiouchi, H; Yamada, S; Yasuda, K, 2017
)
" Risk factors for MEN included older age (>60 years), chronic kidney disease, and high initial dosage of MTX without folic acid supplementation."( Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis: A case series of 24 patients.
Chen, CB; Chen, TJ; Chung, WH; Huang, YH; Hui, RC; Hung, SI; Lu, YT; Wang, CW; Wang, KH; Yang, LC, 2017
)
" To reduce the risk of MEN, physicians should avoid prescribing MTX to high-risk patients and titrate the dosage slowly upward with folic acid supplementation."( Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis: A case series of 24 patients.
Chen, CB; Chen, TJ; Chung, WH; Huang, YH; Hui, RC; Hung, SI; Lu, YT; Wang, CW; Wang, KH; Yang, LC, 2017
)
"Methotrexate has a wide dosing range."( A single center retrospective analysis of a protocol for high-dose methotrexate and leucovorin rescue administration.
Cerminara, Z; Duffy, A; Gilmore, S; Nishioka, J; Trovato, J, 2019
)
"We performed a secondary analysis of a completed multicenter trial that investigated PK-guided 5FU dosing in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 +/- bevacizumab for colorectal cancer."( The impact of skeletal muscle on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer.
Choi, SK; Deal, AM; McLeod, HL; Muss, HB; O'Neil, B; Patel, JN; Sanoff, HK; Shachar, SS; Walko, CM; Weinberg, MS; Williams, GR, 2018
)
"Although our results did not confirm the impact of low skeletal muscle on PKs of 5FU, further research exploring the impact of body composition on chemotherapy PKs and related toxicities is warranted with the potential for alternative dosing strategies in sarcopenic patients to reduce unnecessary toxicities while maintaining efficacy."( The impact of skeletal muscle on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer.
Choi, SK; Deal, AM; McLeod, HL; Muss, HB; O'Neil, B; Patel, JN; Sanoff, HK; Shachar, SS; Walko, CM; Weinberg, MS; Williams, GR, 2018
)
" However, the toxicity and limited dosing of currently available molecular inducers have largely inhibited translation to clinical settings."( Regulation of T cell proliferation with drug-responsive microRNA switches.
Chen, YY; Smolke, CD; Wong, RS, 2018
)
" Dosing and completion of prescribed chemotherapy were assessed on the subset of patients who received all therapy at MSK."( Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Cercek, A; Crane, CH; Garcia-Aguilar, J; Gollub, MJ; Gonen, M; Guillem, JG; Nash, GM; Paty, PB; Reidy, DL; Roxburgh, CSD; Saltz, LB; Segal, NH; Seier, K; Shia, J; Smith, JJ; Stadler, ZK; Strombom, P; Temple, LKF; Vakiani, E; Varghese, A; Weiser, MR; Wu, AJ; Yaeger, R, 2018
)
" A 76-year-old African-American woman with a history of bullous pemphigoid on methotrexate therapy presented with lower extremity cellulitis, developing oral and cutaneous erosions during hospitalization after daily dosage of methotrexate."( Acute mucocutaneous methotrexate toxicity with marked tissue eosinophilia.
Borda, LJ; Milikowski, C; Ross, A; Villada, G, 2018
)
" Dosage was more often reduced in patients receiving FOLFOX based therapy."( Chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer: No effect on survival when the dose is reduced due to side effects.
Evert, M; Fest, P; Fichtner-Feigl, S; Gerken, M; Herr, W; Klinkhammer-Schalke, M; Munker, S; Ott, C; Reng, M; Schlitt, HJ; Schnoy, E; Stroszczynski, C; Teufel, A; Vogelhuber, M; Wiggermann, P, 2018
)
"Contrary to our expectations, the need to reduce chemotherapy dosage due to side effects does not indicate a worse prognosis in our retrospective analysis."( Chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer: No effect on survival when the dose is reduced due to side effects.
Evert, M; Fest, P; Fichtner-Feigl, S; Gerken, M; Herr, W; Klinkhammer-Schalke, M; Munker, S; Ott, C; Reng, M; Schlitt, HJ; Schnoy, E; Stroszczynski, C; Teufel, A; Vogelhuber, M; Wiggermann, P, 2018
)
"To review the evidence for benefits and harms of folate (folic acid or folinic acid) supplementation on methotrexate (MTX) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to assess whether or not folate supplementation would reduce MTX toxicity or reduce MTX benefits, and to decide whether a higher MTX dosage is essential."( Folate Supplementation for Methotrexate Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.
Guan, W; He, Y; Hu, W; Li, T; Liu, L; Liu, S; Liu, X; Lu, J; Wang, C; Wang, P; Xuan, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
" Hyperammonemia induced by 5-FU is relatively rare, with a reported incidence of 5-9%; however, caution is required with high dosage regimens of 5-FU that are currently recommended for colorectal cancer therapy because hyperammonemia is an important side effect."( [A Case of Recurrent Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy during Adjuvant Chemotherapy(Modified FOLFOX6)for Colorectal Cancer].
Funahashi, K; Kagami, S; Tamura, A; Yoshino, Y, 2018
)
" The individualized dosing of CPT-11 is essential to ensure optimal pharmacotherapy in cancer patients, given the wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of this drug and its active metabolite SN-38."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
" Here, we investigated a safe and efficient dosing schedule of oxaliplatin in folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen by monitoring total and free platinum concentrations in plasma."( Dose-escalation of oxaliplatin in hemodialysis patient treated with FOLFOX therapy: A case report.
Cai, X; Fang, W; Gu, Y; Li, X; Wang, D; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Xu, L; Zhao, F, 2019
)
" These data indicate that the use of modified dosing FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC pts older than 75 appears to maintain similar toxicity and efficacy when compared to younger pts."( Modified FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer patients Age 75 or older.
Fogelman, DR; Hess, KR; Ho, L; Javle, MM; Mizrahi, JD; Overman, MJ; Pant, S; Raghav, KPS; Rogers, JE; Shroff, RT; Varadhachary, GR; Wolff, RA, 2020
)
" Demographics, clinical and dosing characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected."( Real-World Dosing Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated With a Liposomal Irinotecan Regimen in the United States.
Ahn, D; Barzi, A; Bekaii-Saab, T; Corvino, FA; Mamlouk, K; Miksad, R; Pulgar, S; Surinach, A; Torres, AZ; Valderrama, A; Wang, S, 2020
)
"04) and a higher chemotherapy dosage (P = ."( Emotional distress and quality of life during folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer patients with and without chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A cross-sectional study.
Chen, JL; Chou, PL; Hsu, HT; Huang, YY; Juan, CH; Lin, PC; Wu, LM, 2020
)
" Evaluation of pharmacogenomically dosed perioperative gFOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and UGT1A1 genotype-directed irinotecan) to optimize efficacy while limiting toxic effects may have value."( Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype-Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Allen, K; Alpert, L; Catenacci, DVT; Chase, L; de Wilton Marsh, R; Ferguson, MK; Gordon, B; Hart, J; Karrison, T; Kindler, HL; Kipping-Johnson, K; Liao, CY; Lomnicki, S; Markevicius, U; Maron, SB; Moore, K; Narula, S; Peterson, B; Polite, BN; Posner, MC; Prachand, VN; Racette, C; Rampurwala, MM; Roggin, KK; Setia, N; Siddiqui, UD; Turaga, K; Xiao, SY, 2020
)
"In this study, perioperative pharmacogenomically dosed gFOLFIRINOX was feasible, providing downstaging with PRG 1 in more than one-third of patients and an R0 resection rate in 92% of patients."( Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype-Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Allen, K; Alpert, L; Catenacci, DVT; Chase, L; de Wilton Marsh, R; Ferguson, MK; Gordon, B; Hart, J; Karrison, T; Kindler, HL; Kipping-Johnson, K; Liao, CY; Lomnicki, S; Markevicius, U; Maron, SB; Moore, K; Narula, S; Peterson, B; Polite, BN; Posner, MC; Prachand, VN; Racette, C; Rampurwala, MM; Roggin, KK; Setia, N; Siddiqui, UD; Turaga, K; Xiao, SY, 2020
)
" This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was performed to determine the effect of different G-CSF regimens on the incidence and duration of neutropenia following FOLFIRINOX administration in order to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule."( Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.
Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Macaire, P; Paris, J; Schmitt, A; Vincent, J, 2020
)
" Final model estimates were used to simulate different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects."( Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.
Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Macaire, P; Paris, J; Schmitt, A; Vincent, J, 2020
)
" Our findings underscore the relevance of the clinically applied LV regimen and highlight the potential of this model to further optimize modifications in dosing and timing of Leucovorin on oral mucosa cells."( Patient-derived oral mucosa organoids as an in vitro model for methotrexate induced toxicity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Clevers, H; de Jonge, R; Driehuis, E; Heil, SG; Jansen, G; Kolders, S; Lin, M; Muller, IB; Oosterom, N; Pieters, R; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, MM, 2020
)
" We aimed to improve FOLFOXIRI by optimization of the dosing and the sequence of drug administration."( Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment.
Nowak-Sliwinska, P; Ramzy, GM; Rausch, M; Zoetemelk, M, 2020
)
" Other dosing schedules or combinations may be evaluated."( Selinexor (KPT-330), an Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Combination with FOLFOX in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) - Final Results of the Phase I Trial SENTINEL.
Amberg, S; Bokemeyer, C; Kranich, AL; Mann, J; Nilsson, S; Papadimitriou, K; Rolfo, C; Stein, A; Theile, S, 2020
)
" Given the known sex differences in fluoropyrimidine pharmacokinetics, sex-specific dosing of fluoropyrimidines warrants further investigation."( Sex and Adverse Events of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer: An Analysis of 34 640 Patients in the ACCENT Database.
Alberts, SR; Allegra, CJ; Andre, T; Blanke, CD; de Gramont, A; Dixon, JG; Francini, E; George, TJ; Goldberg, RM; Grothey, A; Haller, DG; Kerr, R; Marsoni, S; O'Connell, MJ; Saltz, LB; Seitz, JF; Shi, Q; Taieb, J; Twelves, C; VanCutsem, E; Wagner, AD; Wolmark, N; Yothers, G, 2021
)
" Screening patients for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency prior to 5-FU administration may facilitate an individualized strategy for optimal dosing and safety."( 5-Fluorouracil Rechallenge After Cardiotoxicity.
Almnajam, M; Desai, A; Kim, AS; Mohammed, T; Patel, KN, 2020
)
"5, 5, or 10 μg/kg) + 5-flurouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), dosed per manufacturers prescribing information, until tumor progression."( Immunologic and tumor responses of pegilodecakin with 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Aljumaily, R; Autio, KA; Bauer, TM; Bendell, J; Falchook, GS; Hecht, JR; Hung, A; Infante, JR; Javle, M; Leveque, J; Naing, A; Oft, M; Pant, S; Papadopoulos, KP; Patel, MR; Rao, S; Ratti, N; VanVlasselaer, P; Verma, R; Wainberg, ZA; Wong, DJ, 2021
)
" Whereas reductions of NTx dosage was more common in elderly patients in comparison 1 (p = 0."( Neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients receiving FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and lead to a similar oncological outcome compared to non-aged patients - Results of the
Ceyhan, GO; Damm, M; Kordes, M; Maggino, L; Moir, J; Rosendahl, J; Schorn, S; Weniger, M, 2020
)
" Folinic acid dosage was 2 mg/kg up to 50 mg per day for the entire course of the study."( Folinic Acid as Adjunctive Therapy in Treatment of Inappropriate Speech in Children with Autism: A Double-Blind and Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Batebi, N; Fakour, Y; Hasanzadeh, A; Moghaddam, HS; Mohammadi, MR, 2021
)
" LV is very potent in the prevention of neurotoxicity and administration of LV could protect the normal cells, but the dosage and duration of LV should be according to the MTX concentration."( How to rescue high-dose methotrexate induced nephrotoxicity and literature review about hemodiafiltration?
Ding, N; Gao, L; Gao, LH; Wang, XB; Wang, Z; Yang, YY; Zhang, LP, 2020
)
" Dose reduction was defined as any decrease from initial dose; dose delay was any dosing delay >3 days from target date."( Early dose reduction/delay and the efficacy of liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): A post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Belanger, B; Blanc, JF; Chen, LT; de Jong, FA; Macarulla, T; Mirakhur, B; Siveke, JT, 2021
)
" Further optimization in terms of dosing and timing will enhance clinical potential of this combination strategy for patients."( Two nanoformulations induce reactive oxygen species and immunogenetic cell death for synergistic chemo-immunotherapy eradicating colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Guo, J; Huang, L; Liu, Y; Sun, D; Yu, Z; Zou, Y, 2021
)
" The anamnesis revealed that he had been taken the prescribed dosage of MTX daily, instead of weekly."( Bowel perforation due to methotrexate therapeutic error: an insidious adverse reaction.
Cirronis, M; Locatelli, CA; Novara, E; Perlini, S; Persiano, T, 2021
)
" Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism."( Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone.
de Gramont, A; Glimelius, B; Marshall, J; Stintzing, S; Yoshino, T, 2021
)
" The optimal dosage and duration of FA rescue remain controversial."( Reduced dose folinic acid rescue after rapid high-dose methotrexate clearance is not associated with increased toxicity in a pediatric cohort.
Aarnivala, H; Banerjee, J; Harila-Saari, A; Niinimäki, R; Pokka, T; Vepsäläinen, K, 2022
)
" Additionally, universal dosing and timing guidelines are lacking."( Role of folinic acid in methotrexate-based prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
AlJohani, NI, 2021
)
"FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOXIRI are combination chemotherapy treatments that incorporate the same drug cocktail (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) but exploit an altered dosing regimen when used in the management of pancreatic and colorectal cancer, respectively."( A single microbubble formulation carrying 5-fluorouridine, Irinotecan and oxaliplatin to enable FOLFIRINOX treatment of pancreatic and colon cancer using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction.
Callan, B; Callan, JF; Gao, J; Griffith, DM; Logan, KA; Love, M; McHale, AP; McKaig, T; Nesbitt, H; Taylor, M, 2021
)
" Metabolic activity, citrulline levels and cytokine/chemokine production were measured to determine the optimal dosage and incubation time."( Development of a self-limiting model of methotrexate-induced mucositis reinforces butyrate as a potential therapy.
da Silva Ferreira, AR; Garssen, J; Harmsen, HJM; Harthoorn, LF; Hartog, A; Ten Klooster, JP; Tissing, WJE; van Bergenhenegouwen, J; van der Aa, SAJ; Wardill, HR; Wehkamp, T, 2021
)
" While the recommended dosing schedule for the triplet chemotherapy regimen with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in combination with bevacizumab is well established, the optimal dosing of FOLFOXIRI in combination with anti-EGFR agents is unknown."( Triplet chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR agents for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Current evidence, advances, and future perspectives.
Cremolini, C; Esser, R; Falcone, A; Folprecht, G; Martinelli, E; Mazard, T; Modest, DP; Tsuji, A, 2022
)
"To describe the management and outcome of a dog following a 10-fold dosing error of vincristine."( Successful management and recovery of a dog with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia following vincristine overdose.
Blong, AE; Poirier, M; Walton, RAL, 2022
)
" However, with the emergence of conditions where folate metabolism and transport are disrupted, such as folate receptor alpha autoantibody (FRαAb)-induced folate deficiency, it is critical to find a folate form that is effective and safe for pharmacologic dosing for prolonged periods."( Absorption and Tissue Distribution of Folate Forms in Rats: Indications for Specific Folate Form Supplementation during Pregnancy.
Arning, E; Bobrowski-Khoury, N; Bottiglieri, T; Quadros, EV; Sequeira, JM, 2022
)
"High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is active against various malignancies; it possesses serious toxicities and is associated with patient characteristics, dosage regimens, comedications, and physiological status."( Leucovorin (folinic acid) rescue for high-dose methotrexate: A review.
Jiang, R; Mei, S; Zhao, Z, 2022
)
"Original FOLFIRINOX (oFFX) is more toxic than other regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC); therefore, a modified FFX (mFFX) regimen with a reduced dosage has been used in Japanese clinical practice."( Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Original versus Modified FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the NAPOLEON Study.
Arima, S; Fukahori, M; Honda, T; Ide, Y; Ido, A; Kawahira, M; Koga, F; Komori, A; Makiyama, A; Mitsugi, K; Mizuta, T; Nakazawa, J; Nio, K; Otsu, S; Otsuka, T; Shibuki, T; Shimokawa, M; Shirakawa, T; Taguchi, H; Tsuruta, N; Ueda, Y; Ureshino, N, 2023
)
" Treatment was started with 30 mg of prednisolone, and the dosage was gradually decreased."( [A Case of Unilateral Interstitial Lung Disease in a Patient Treated with Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin].
Aisaki, K; Aoki, K; Doumoto, Y; Funatsu, K; Hosaka, M; Kimura, T; Kobori, S; Minoshima, K; Ushiku, H; Wakabayashi, M; Yoshida, H, 2022
)
" Logistic regression analysis explored the relationship between BSA or weight adjusted MTX dosing and: (i) CR to first-line chemotherapy; (ii) incidence of disease relapse."( Flat-dose versus weight or body surface area-based methotrexate dosing in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cushen, BF; Hancock, BW; Hills, A; Kandiah, K; Palmer, JE; Parker, VL; Singh, K; Tidy, JA; Winter, MC, 2023
)
"In LR-GTN patients, BSA and weight adjusted MTX-FA dosing did not influence CR to first-line chemotherapy or the incidence of disease relapse."( Flat-dose versus weight or body surface area-based methotrexate dosing in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cushen, BF; Hancock, BW; Hills, A; Kandiah, K; Palmer, JE; Parker, VL; Singh, K; Tidy, JA; Winter, MC, 2023
)
"In the treatment of LR-GTN, dose individualisation using BSA or weight is not required, and fixed dosing continues to be preferred as the UK standard."( Flat-dose versus weight or body surface area-based methotrexate dosing in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cushen, BF; Hancock, BW; Hills, A; Kandiah, K; Palmer, JE; Parker, VL; Singh, K; Tidy, JA; Winter, MC, 2023
)
" Pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, terminal elimination half-life, and terminal rate constant) of 3 preparations were calculated."( Three-Period Bioequivalence Study of Sodium Levofolinate Injection With Calcium Levofolinate for Injection and Sodium Folinate for Injection in Healthy Chinese Subjects.
Chen, X; Huang, Y; Jia, Y; Liu, G; Liu, R; Qiu, B; Shen, J; Wang, C, 2023
)
" Pharmacokinetic-guided (PKG) dosing has demonstrated beneficial effects in other tumors, but scarce data is available in pancreatic cancer."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Aldaz, A; Arbea, L; Chopitea, A; Martí-Cruchaga, P; Pardo, F; Ponz-Sarvise, M; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J; Rotellar, F; Sala-Elarre, P; Subtil, JC; Urrizola, A; Vilalta-Lacarra, A; Zozaya, G, 2023
)
" 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) dosage was adjusted throughout neoadjuvant treatment according to pharmacokinetic parameters and Irinotecan (CPT-11) pharmacokinetic variables were retrospectively estimated."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Aldaz, A; Arbea, L; Chopitea, A; Martí-Cruchaga, P; Pardo, F; Ponz-Sarvise, M; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J; Rotellar, F; Sala-Elarre, P; Subtil, JC; Urrizola, A; Vilalta-Lacarra, A; Zozaya, G, 2023
)
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
metaboliteAny intermediate or product resulting from metabolism. The term 'metabolite' subsumes the classes commonly known as primary and secondary metabolites.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
5-formyltetrahydrofolic acidA formyltetrahydrofolic acid in which the formyl group is located at position 5.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (4)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Folate metabolism ( Folate metabolism )2039
formylTHF biosynthesis II027
Folate metabolism156
Biochemical pathways: part I0466

Research

Studies (10,278)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19901665 (16.20)18.7374
1990's1900 (18.49)18.2507
2000's2598 (25.28)29.6817
2010's3095 (30.11)24.3611
2020's1020 (9.92)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials3,248 (29.56%)5.53%
Reviews1,002 (9.12%)6.00%
Case Studies1,661 (15.12%)4.05%
Observational90 (0.82%)0.25%
Other4,987 (45.39%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (705)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Pilot Trial of Hyper-CVAD and Methotrexate/ARA C Plus Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00041132]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of 4-regimen (SP, FL/Tax, FL/Doc, FOLFOX) in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer[NCT01283204]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-09Completed
A Phase II Study of MOAD (Methotrexate, Vincristine, L-asparaginase and Dexamethasone) With Subcutaneous Campath for Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00262925]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
A Multicenter Trial Investigating the Duration of Adjuvant Therapy(3 vs. 6 Months) With the FOLFOX 4 or XELOX Regimen for Patients With High Risk Stage II or Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT01308086]Phase 32,000 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Atezolizumab +/- Chemotherapy in Resectable MSI-H/dMMR Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer[NCT05836584]Phase 2240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-06-08Recruiting
Randomized Trial of Standard Chemotherapy Alone or Combined With Atezolizumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer and Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair[NCT02912559]Phase 3700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-16Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of 2nd Line FOLFIRI Versus Modified FOLFIRI With PARP Inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) (NSC-737664) in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer[NCT02890355]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Alternating Systemic and Hepatic Artery Infusion Therapy Versus Systemic Chemotherapy Alone As Adjuvant Treatment After Resection of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Labelled, Active-Contro[NCT02529774]Phase 2/Phase 3432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Study of Riluzole in Combination With mFOLFOX6/Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT04761614]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-02Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of PEP02 or Irinotecan in Combination With Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in Second Line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01375816]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to efficacy interim analysis as per protocol)
ESSAI DE PHASE III RANDOMISE EVALUANT LE FOLFOX AVEC OU SANS DOCETAXEL (TFOX) EN 1ère LIGNE DE CHIMIOTHERAPIE DES ADENOCARCINOMES OESO-GASTRIQUES LOCALEMENT AVANCES OU METASTATIQUES[NCT03006432]Phase 3507 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-19Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Open-Label Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Combination With Modified FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Good Performance Status[NCT01835041]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
PERIOP-FOLFIRINOX: A Pilot Trial of Perioperative Genotype-guided Irinotecan Dosing of gFOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT02366819]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-11Recruiting
Phase I Trial of Radioimmunotherapy (Y-90 M5A) in Combination With FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT01205022]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Second-line FOLFIRI + Panitumumab in Subjects With Wild Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received FOLFOX + Panitumumab in First-line[NCT03751176]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-08Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of the Combination of Low-Intensity Chemotherapy and Blinatumomab in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT03518112]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-18Terminated(stopped due to Due to Competing Studies)
H-9926-LCH III: Treatment Protocol of the Third International Study for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis[NCT00488605]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to This is a duplicate record and the sponsor has registered the study.)
A Stratified Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Given Before SCPRT as Treatment for Patients With MRI-Staged Operable Rectal Cancer at High Risk of Metastatic Relapse[NCT01263171]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Phase 3, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Chemotherapy Compared With Standard of Care Therapy as First-line Intervention in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Gastroeso[NCT04662710]Phase 3890 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-30Active, not recruiting
Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance of Perioperative Chemotherapy With 5FU-Cisplatin-Cetuximab in Adenocarcinomas of the Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction. Phase II Single Arm, Multicenter.[NCT01360086]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Calcium Plus Oxaliplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: a Multi-center, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT01364376]583 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Phase II, Multicentric Randomized Trial, Evaluating the Efficacy of Fluoropyrimidine-based Standard Chemotherapy, Associated to Either Cetuximab or Bevacizumab, in KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Progressive Disease After Receivi[NCT01442649]Phase 2133 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Oxaliplatin, Folinic Acid and 5 Fluorouracil Alone or in Combination With Intravenous Chemotherapy in Heavily Pre-Treated Patients With Liver-Predominant Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer[NCT02345746]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to patient population)
A Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI + Panitumumab as First-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-type Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Good Performance Status[NCT03142516]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-31Completed
mFOLFOXIRI Compared to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOx as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB or Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Research[NCT05200299]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pamrevlumab or Placebo in Combination With Either Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer[NCT03941093]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-10Active, not recruiting
Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation[NCT00335816]Phase 2248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Active, not recruiting
Avelumab Added to FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab Followed by Avelumab Maintenance in Patients With Previously Untreated RAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancer. The Phase II FIRE-6 Study[NCT05217069]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-27Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Nivolumab (NSC # 748726), a Checkpoint Inhibitor of PD-1, in B-ALL Patients Aged >/= 1 to < 31 Years Old With First Relapse[NCT04546399]Phase 2550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-04Suspended(stopped due to Other - FDA Partial Clinical Hold)
Randomised, Multicentre, Phase II Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With FOLFIRI-aflibercept Compared to Initial Treatment With FOLFIRI-aflibercept (for 6 Cycles) Followed by Maintenance With 5FU-aflibercept, in an Elderly Populat[NCT03279289]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-25Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of PET Scan-Directed Combined Modality Therapy in Esophageal Cancer[NCT01333033]Phase 2257 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
An Open Randomized Single Site Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study, of Calciumfolinat 60 mg/m², 200 mg/m² or 500 mg/ m² in Blood, Tumor and Adjacent Mucosa From Patients With Colon Cancer[NCT02959541]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of FOLFIRI in Combination With Sorafenib and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies[NCT01383343]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Comparing S-1/Leucovorin With sLV5FU2 as the First-line Treatment for Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer[NCT01193452]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Recruiting
A Phase II Clinical Trial of High Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Combination With FOLFOX + Bevacizumab in the 1st Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01198548]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Every Two Weeks With Bevacizumab to the Same Regimen Without Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Patients With Resected Stages II and III Carcinoma [NCT00096278]Phase 32,710 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-15Completed
Intensive Chemotherapy And Immunotherapy In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma[NCT00098774]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Treatment of Late Isolated Extramedullary Relapse From Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) (Initial CR1≥ 18 Months)[NCT00096135]168 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT00079274]Phase 33,397 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase II Trial of Modified FOLFOX-6 Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy and Post-operative Response Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus, Gastro-esophageal Junction, and[NCT02037048]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-10Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Treatment Selection Based Upon Tumor Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00098787]Phase 2247 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-08Completed
A Phase I Study Of Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine And Dexamethasone In Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin Plus 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin As Adjuvant Treatment After Resection Of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer[NCT00059930]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN™) When Added to 5 Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) With the Efficacy and Safety of Plac[NCT00399035]Phase 31,254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Alisertib (MLN8237) in Combination With mFOLFOX in Gastrointestinal Tumors[NCT02319018]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-27Completed
Phase II Study of Combination of Hyper-CVAD and Dasatinib (NSC-732517) With or Without Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Philadelphia (Ph) Chromosome Positive and/or BCR-ABL Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) (A BMT Study)[NCT00792948]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-01Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing Second Look Laparoscopy to Standard Follow up in Patients With no Radiologic Evidence of Disease at 6 Months After Complete Resection of Colorectal Mucinous Carcinoma[NCT01628211]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-04-30Recruiting
The Impact on Recurrence Risk of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoinfusion (TAI) Versus Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma And Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (PVTT) After Hepatectomy : A Random, Controlled,[NCT03192644]Phase 3162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-01Recruiting
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Using Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Patients With Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma[NCT02436044]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial: Intraportal Chemotherapy Combined With Adjuvant Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6) for Stage II and III Colon Cancer[NCT02402972]Phase 3700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
A Phase IB Study FOLFIRINOX and NIS793 in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer[NCT05417386]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-09Recruiting
Comparative Analysis of Immune Profile Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM): A Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial[NCT03698461]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Dasatinib (Sprycel®) (NSC #732517) as Primary Therapy Followed by Transplantation for Adults >/= 18 Years With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by CALGB, ECOG and SWOG[NCT01256398]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-14Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study of the Efficacy of Hepatic Arterial Perfusion Chemotherapy Concurrently Compared to Sequentially Combined With Targeted and Immunotherapy in Potentially Resectable Intermediate and Advanced HCC[NCT06041477]Phase 3540 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Irinotecan and POF (Paclitaxel Plus Oxaliplatin Plus 5-fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin) and Tislelizumab[NCT05319639]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-16Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Alone or in Combination With Bevacizumab Compared to Bevacizumab With a Fluoropyrimidine in Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Not [NCT04456699]Phase 3335 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-19Completed
Treatment of Social and Language Deficits With Leucovorin for Young Children With Autism[NCT04060030]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-08Recruiting
METIMMOX: Colorectal Cancer METastasis - Shaping Anti-tumor IMMunity by OXaliplatin[NCT03388190]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Multicenter Open-label Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Folfirinox (FFX) Versus Combination of CPI-613 With Modified Folfirinox (mFFX) in Patients With Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas[NCT03504423]Phase 3528 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Completed
To Observe the Pathological Remission Rate and Safety of FOLFOXIRI for Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-risk Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer With a Single-arm, Open, Prospective Phase II Exploratory Clinical Study[NCT05018182]Phase 269 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-02Recruiting
Post-resection/Ablation Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicenter Phase III Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Active Post-resection/Ablation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Canc[NCT05008809]Phase 3507 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-06Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of the JAK1/JAK2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib With Chemotherapy in Children With De Novo High-Risk CRLF2-Rearranged and/or JAK Pathway-Mutant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia[NCT02723994]Phase 2171 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Surgical Conversion Rate in Patients Receiving FOLFOXIRI +/- Cetuximab for Unresectable Wild-Type KRAS/NRAS Colorectal Cancer With Metastases Confined to the Liver[NCT02063529]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Ziv-Aflibercept Followed by the Addition of 5-FU in the Third Line Setting of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02235324]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Short-course Radiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy, Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy, and Selective Organ Preservation for MRI-defined Intermediate and High-risk Rectal Cancer Patients[NCT04246684]Phase 3702 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of SLOG vs mFOLFIRINOX as the First-line Treatment in Locally Advanced Uncresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer[NCT03443492]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-26Enrolling by invitation
An Open-label, Multicenter, Single-arm, Phase 1b/2 Study of NANT-008 in Combination With 5-fluorouracil, Bevacizumab, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.[NCT03127124]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-27Suspended(stopped due to IRB Recommendation)
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of FOLFOXIRI Compared to FOLFOX in First Line Treatment of Chemo-naive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02128425]Phase 2162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of MEGF0444A Dosed to Progression in Combination With Bevacizumab and FOLFOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01399684]Phase 2127 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy, Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) (NSC # 716051), and Transplantation for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by the CALGB and SWOG[NCT00039377]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Open, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing 5FU/ FA Plus Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus 5FU/FA Plus Irinotecan as First-line Treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00154102]Phase 31,221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Futibatinib in Combination With PD-1 Antibody-based Standard of Care Therapy in Patients With Solid Tumors.[NCT05945823]Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-13Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating Combination of TST001, Nivolumab and Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Subjects With Claudin18.2 Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (G[NCT06093425]Phase 3950 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial Investigating Bortezomib (NSC# 681239) on a Modified Augmented BFM (ABFM) Backbone in Newly Diagnosed T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy)[NCT02112916]Phase 3847 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-04Active, not recruiting
Orzel (UFT+Leucovorin) as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT00005608]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Drug was pulled from the market.)
International Phase 3 Trial in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Testing Imatinib in Combination With Two Different Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Backbones[NCT03007147]Phase 3475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-08Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC# 772518) in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory CD22+ B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)[NCT02981628]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-19Active, not recruiting
Risk-Stratified Randomized Phase III Testing of Blinatumomab (NSC#765986) in First Relapse of Childhood B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)[NCT02101853]Phase 3669 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Active, not recruiting
Intensified Methotrexate, Nelarabine (Compound 506U78) and Augmented BFM Therapy for Children and Young Adults With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma[NCT00408005]Phase 31,895 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-22Active, not recruiting
Phase I Clinical Trial With LBH589 and Infusional 5-FU/LV in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Failed 5-FU Based Chemotherapy[NCT01238965]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Adverse Events)
High Risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00075725]Phase 33,154 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-29Completed
[NCT01160419]Phase 249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-12-31Active, not recruiting
Intensive Treatment For T-CELL Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Advanced Stage Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Pediatric Oncology Group Phase III Study[NCT01230983]Phase 3573 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of mFOLFOX vs. mFOLFIRI in Advanced or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer Refractory to First Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin[NCT03464968]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-29Completed
SAMSUNG MEDICAL CENTER[NCT03110510]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-06Withdrawn(stopped due to institution problem)
Multicenter Study Investigating Utilization of Pharmacokinetic-Guided 5-Fluorouracil in Patients Receiving mFOLFOX6 With or Without Bevacizumab[NCT01164215]Phase 176 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Single Centre, Open-label, Parallel-group, Single Oral Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Male Subjects[NCT03258762]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-25Completed
Adjuvant Modified FOLFOXIRI Versus mFOLFOX6 in Patients With Postoperative MRD Positive Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Open Lable Randomized Phase 3 Study (AFFORD)[NCT05427669]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-09Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) or FOLFIRI as SEcond-line Therapy in NEuroendocrine CArcinomas and Exploratory Analysis of Predictive Role of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging and Biological Markers[NCT03387592]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Recruiting
Pilot / Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Systemic Therapy to Cytoreduction + Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Mitomycin C + Standard Systemic Therapy in Patients With Limited Peritoneal Dissemination of Colon Adenocarcinoma[NCT01167725]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Active, not recruiting
Randomized, Double Blind Phase II Study of FOLFOX/Bevacizumab Combined With MK-0646 Versus FOLFOX/Bevacizumab Combined With Placebo in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01175291]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to treatment deemed ineffective so accrual was closed)
A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid (FOLFIRI) With or Without the Addition of an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy[NCT01205711]Phase 2111 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Optimizing Ultrasound Enhanced Delivery of Therapeutics[NCT04821284]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-06Recruiting
A Phase IIa (Pilot) Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Folinic Acid, 5-FU, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) With Digoxin in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer[NCT04141995]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-12Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of Oleclumab (MEDI9447) With or Without Durvalumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Subjects With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma[NCT03611556]Phase 1/Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-21Completed
A Phase II Trial of Radioimmunotherapy (Y-90 M5A) Following Hepatic Resection and FOLFIRI or FOLFOX Chemotherapy [+/-BEVACIZUMAB], or Xelox for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to the Liver[NCT01320683]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Regorafenib in Combination With FOLFIRI Versus Placebo With FOLFIRI as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01298570]Phase 2181 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-07Completed
Chemotherapy With FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab (AvastinR) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Bearing Genotype UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*28: Prospective, Phase II, Multicenter Study[NCT00628810]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
[NCT02870036]Phase 1243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Resectability in Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver Metastases Secondary to Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-line Treatment Either With mFOLFOX-6 Plus Bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI Plus [NCT00778102]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A PHASE III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FOLFOXIRI + BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS FOLFIRI + BEVACIZUMAB AS FIRST- LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER[NCT00719797]Phase 3509 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Escalating High Dose Methotrexate Supported by Glucarpidase to Treat Patients With Primary Central Nervous Lymphoma (PCNSL)[NCT00727831]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Pilot Study of FOLFOX6 Plus Sir-Spheres® Microspheres (Chemo-radiotherapy) in Combination With Bevacizumab (Avastin) as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Nonresectable Liver Metastases From Primary Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00735241]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn by the study sponsor.)
Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-Label Phase 2 Study of CS-7017 in Combination With FOLFIRI in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Failed First-Line Therapy[NCT00967616]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Feasibility and Dose Discovery Analysis of Zoledronic Acid With Concurrent Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Osteosarcoma[NCT00742924]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of SCH 717454 in Combination With Different Treatment Regimens in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors (Phase 1B/2; Protocol No. P04722)[NCT00954512]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-25Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated for business reasons.)
A Multi Center Phase II Study of 5-Fluorouracil/ Folinic Acid Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.[NCT00919282]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Dose-Levels of Vorinostat in Combination With 5-FU and Leucovorin in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00942266]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of Sunitinib In Combination With Irinotecan, L-leucovorin, And 5-Fluorouracil In Patients With Unresectable Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00668863]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Phase III Study Evaluating the Use of Systemic Chemotherapy and Chemohyperthemia Intraperitoneal Preoperatively (CHIP) and After Maximum Resection of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Originating With Colorectal Cancer[NCT00769405]Phase 3264 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin in Combination With 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Folinic Acid (FA) in Patients Who Have Failed First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.[NCT00782041]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Terminated(stopped due to protocol violation)
Maintenance and Reinduction Chemotherapy With Avastin in Metastatic Colon Cancer: The MARTHA (SICOG 0803) Trial[NCT00797485]Phase 3672 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Recruiting
"PsyCARE Trial - Efficiency of a Composite Personalised Care on Functional Outcome in Early Psychosis : A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial "[NCT05796401]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-15Not yet recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Therapeutic Strategies Combining Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy: De-escalation Versus Escalation in Patients With Non-pretreated Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02842580]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Inclusion rythm too slow.)
A Non-randomized Phase 2 Study of Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without 5-FU and Leucovorin for Relapsed or Refractory Germ-Cell Tumors[NCT00957905]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Huaier Granule for Treating High-risk Stage II, Stage III Colorectal Cancer[NCT02785146]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Recruiting
A Phase Ib Adaptive Study Dasatinib for the Prevention of Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer Receiving FOLFOX Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab[NCT04164069]Phase 19 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Seeking Study of AZD2171 Given Daily Orally in Combination With Selected Standard Chemotherapy Regimens (CT) in Patients With Advanced Incurable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) or Colorectal Cancer[NCT00343408]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-29Completed
A Study to Characterize and Evaluate Biomarkers of Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer In The First-line Setting[NCT03532711]264 participants (Actual)Observational2012-01-01Completed
A Phase II Study Assessing Tumor Blood Flow as Measured by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving FOLFOX Alone Versus Patients Randomized to Receive FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab at 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg.[NCT00602329]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Due to Poor accrual)
PFL-Alpha Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery or FHX for Early Stage Esophageal Cancer - A Pilot Project[NCT00004897]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Institutional Review Board requested termination - all patients deceased and no new accrual.)
Phase II Study of Multimodality Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00004231]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Pilot and Feasibility Study of PD-1 Blockade With Nivolumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT03970252]Early Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-24Recruiting
Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Weekly Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Resectable, Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction or Gastric Cardia[NCT02730546]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-24Active, not recruiting
Neo-adjuvant Transarterial Chemoinfusion (TAI) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan/UCSF Criteria Who Underwent Liver Transplantation[NCT04595864]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Recruiting
Randomized Phase III Trial of 5-FU Based Maintenance Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in Patients With RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Induction With FOLFOX + Panitumumab[NCT03300609]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-27Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient Accrual)
Randomised Study to Investigate FOLFOXIRI Plus Cetuximab vs. FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of BRAF-mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT04034459]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-25Active, not recruiting
Effect of Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection on Survival and Quality of Life in Patients With Limited-metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Esophagogastric Junction - A Phase III Trial of Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internist[NCT02578368]Phase 3271 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Phase II Study of Peri-Operative Modified Folfirinox in Localized Pancreatic Cancer[NCT02047474]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-25Active, not recruiting
Role of Folinic Acid in Improving the Adaptive Skills and Language Impairment in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder[NCT05013164]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Completed
NEOadjuvant Chemotherapy Only Compared With Standard Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Trial[NCT03280407]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-01Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of S-1 Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer[NCT02128243]Phase 2242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Single-arm Phase II Study of Maintenance Therapy With Aflibercept After First-line Treatment With FOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients[NCT02129257]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-26Completed
The Purpose of This Study is to Evaluate the Effectiveness of MB-6 as Adjuvant Therapy in Reducing Neutropenia When Given Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage 3 Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With Surgery.[NCT02135887]184 participants (Anticipated)Observational2013-11-04Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-lable, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Irinotecan Versus Oxaliplatin in the First-line Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT03567629]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-29Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Parallel Control Trial to Compare mFOLFOX Versus mFOLFIRI Versus FOLFPTX (a Combination of Paclitaxel, Fluorouracil) as First-line Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer or Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction[NCT03045770]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-10Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2 Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of mFOLFOX6+Panitumumab Combination Therapy and 5-FU/LV+Panitumumab Combination Therapy in the Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Unresectable Advanced Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma of KRAS Wild-[NCT02337946]Phase 2164 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-16Completed
Early Treatment of Language Impairment in Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder With Leucovorin Calcium[NCT04060017]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-22Recruiting
Leucovorin for the Treatment of Language Impairment in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder[NCT02839915]Phase 2134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-13Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Metformin Plus Modified FOLFOX 6 in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01666730]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-21Completed
Standard Risk B-precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00103285]Phase 35,377 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-11Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized Phase 2 Study of ABT-869 in Combination With mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Folinic Acid) Versus Bevacizumab in Combination With mFOLFOX6 as Second-line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00707889]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan Followed By Postoperative Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver[NCT00019760]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-04-30Completed
The Effect of Oral Folinic Acid Rescue Therapy on Pemetrexed Induced Neutropenia: A Randomized Open-label Trial[NCT06010277]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-06Recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of FOLFOX Bevacizumab Plus Botensilimab and Balstilimab (3B-FOLFOX) in Patients With MSS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT05627635]Phase 1/Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-03Recruiting
A Phase III Study of Consolidative Radiotherapy in Patients With Oligometastatic HER2 Negative Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinoma (EGA)[NCT04248452]Phase 3314 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-26Recruiting
A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study, Comparing the Efficacy of Aflibercept Once Every 2 Weeks Versus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC) Treated With Irinotecan / 5-FU Combination (FOLFIRI) After Failure of an Oxalipla[NCT00561470]Phase 31,226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Folate Absorption Across the Large Intestine, Study #2: Capsule Study[NCT00941174]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Feasibility Pilot and Phase II Study Of Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab (IND #12034) for Children With Relapsed CD22-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00098839]Phase 1/Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Phase II Single Arm Study of the Use of CODOX-M/IVAC With Rituximab (R-CODOX-M/IVAC) in the Treatment of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (International Prognostic Index High or High-Intermediate Risk)[NCT00974792]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
A Pilot Study To Determine The Toxicity Of The Addition Of Rituximab To The Induction And Consolidation Phases And The Addition Of Rasburicase To The Reduction Phase In Children With Newly Diagnosed Advanced B-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma Treated With LMB/FAB T[NCT00057811]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study of Subcutaneous Campath-1H (NSC #715969, IND #10864) During Intensification Therapy in Adults With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00061945]Phase 1/Phase 2302 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Selective Use of Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT00462501]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Avastin, Irinotecan, High Dose 24 Hour Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Floxuridine and Leucovorin in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00449163]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-01Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by University of Miami Institutional Review Board)
Multi-Centre Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone, As Adjuvant Treatment After Resection Of Liver Metastases For Colorectal Cancer.[NCT00143403]Phase 3321 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Randomized Phase III Study for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Disseminated Lymphoblastic Lymphoma or Localized Lymphoblastic Lymphoma[NCT00004228]Phase 3393 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel - Cisplatin Chemotherapy, Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and 5-FU/Leucovorin for Gastric Cancer[NCT00003298]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-01Completed
Hepatic Resection Followed by Concurrent Adjuvant Portal Vein Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine and Systemic 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00002842]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-09-30Completed
Characterization and Research of Predictive Markers of Neurotoxicity During Treatment With Oxaliplatin in Colorectal Carcinoma: a Genetic and Proteomic Approach. Phase II Multicenter Study[NCT00884767]Phase 2206 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-09-30Recruiting
Open Comparative Study With a Cross-over According to Patients'Preference Receiving Xeloda or UFT With Folinic Acid in Advanced or Metastatic Colo-rectal Cancer[NCT00905047]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
FIRE-5 -Study: Optimal Anti-EGFR Treatment of mCRC Patients With Low-Frequency RAS Mutation[NCT04034173]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study Of Systemic High-Dose Methotrexate For The Treatment Of Glioblastoma Multiforme In Newly Diagnosed Patients With Measurable Disease[NCT00082797]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-07-12Completed
A Phase II Study of ORZEL (UFT + Leucovorin) in Elderly (at Least 75 Years Old) Patients With Colorectal Cancer[NCT00004860]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-10-09Completed
A Randomized Investigation of Side Effects to FOLFOXIRI in Combination With Tocotrienol or Placebo as First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02705300]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-06Active, not recruiting
NEO-adjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer[NCT06094140]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-20Recruiting
FLOX + Cetuximab (Erbitux®): First Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Wild Type K-RAS Tumor, A Phase II Study[NCT00660582]Phase 2152 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Randomized Phase III Study of UFT+Leucovorin vs. TS-1 as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage III Colon Cancer , and Investigate Predictive Factors Based on Gene Expression[NCT00660894]Phase 31,535 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase II Pilot Trial of Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) in Combination With Intensive Re-Induction Therapy for Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL)[NCT00873093]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Phase Ib Feasibility Study of Personalized Kinase Inhibitor Therapy Combined With Induction in Acute Leukemias Who Exhibit In Vitro Kinase Inhibitor Sensitivity[NCT02779283]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-13Completed
A Genotype-Guided Dosing Study of FOLFIRABRAX in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies[NCT02333188]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) + Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) + Chemotherapy Compared With Standard of Care as First-line Intervention in Participants With Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma[NCT04949256]Phase 3862 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-28Recruiting
A Phase 3 Trial Investigating Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk or Down Syndrome B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) and the Treatment of Patients With Localized B-Lymphoblastic Lymphom[NCT03914625]Phase 36,720 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-03Recruiting
Chemotherapy Intensification in Patients With High Lactate Dehydrogenase Values and Soluble Syndecan-1 Levels[NCT03117972]Phase 2177 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-04Active, not recruiting
Pharmacogenomically Selected Treatment for Gastric and Gastroesophageal (GEJ) Tumors: A Phase II Study[NCT00515216]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Pharmacogenomically Selected Treatment for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Tumors: A Phase II Study[NCT00514020]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase II, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of ZD6474 (Vandetanib) in Combination With FOLFOX vs FOLFOX Alone for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Who Have Failed Therapy With a[NCT00500292]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Intergroup Randomized Phase III Study of Postoperative Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin vs Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Bevacizumab for Patients With Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Receiving Pre-operative Chemoradiation[NCT00303628]Phase 3355 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-11Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated before reaching its accrual goal due to slow accrual.)
Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance to Chemotherapy With 5-fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00467142]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-23Completed
An Open-label, Multi-center, ph II Platform Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of NIS793 and Other New Investigational Drug Combinations With SOC Anti-cancer Therapy for the 2L Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)[NCT04952753]Phase 2205 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-15Active, not recruiting
An Exploratory Study of Treatment Sensitivity and Prognostic Factors in a Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Therapy vs. mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Therapy in Patients With Chemotherapy-naïve Wi[NCT02394834]757 participants (Actual)Observational2015-05-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative FOLFIRINOX Followed by Gemcitabine Based Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT01897454]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-27Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to slower than anticipated accrual)
A Open Label, Non Randomized, Phase Two Trial in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) With the Combination of m FOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as First Line Treatment: MINOAS Trial[NCT02624726]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase III Trial of Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy Plus Cetuximab (NSC-714692) or Bevacizumab (NSC-704865) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Progressed on Bevacizumab With Either FOLFOX, OPTIMOX or XELOX[NCT00499369]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to inadequate accrual, study was terminated and limited outcome data was reported.)
A Two Part Study in Japanese Patients With mCRC, Consisting of an Open-label Phase I Part to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Cediranib (AZD2171) in Combination With FOLFOX Followed by a Phase II, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Ass[NCT00494221]Phase 1/Phase 2172 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Phase I and Dose Expansion Cohort Study of Panobinostat in Combination With Fludarabine and Cytarabine in Pediatric Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome[NCT02676323]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-03Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Randomized Trial Investigating the Role of FOLFOX-4 Regimen Duration (3 Versus 6 Months) and Bevacizumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer[NCT00646607]Phase 33,756 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
An Open Labeled Phase 2 Study of Gemcitabine in Combination With Cisplatin, 5-FU (24h CI) and Folinic Acid in Patients With Inoperable Esophageal Cancer[NCT00759226]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Clinical Phase II Study Evaluating Systemic Chemotherapy in Combination With Cetuximab as Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Completely Surgically Resected Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin[NCT00766142]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-01Terminated(stopped due to In 2008, new data highlighted that Cetuximab had no efficacy in case of KRAS mutation. As such, eligibility criteria were revised and limited to KRAS wild-type. Inclusions were thus slown down considerably, and the trial was stopped.)
Randomized, Multinational, Study Of Aflibercept And Modified FOLFOX6 As First-Line Treatment In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00851084]Phase 2268 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Phase 2b, DB, Randomized Study Evaluating Efficacy & Safety of Sorafenib Compared With Placebo When Administered in Combination With Modified FOLFOX6 for the Treatment of Metastatic CRC Subjects Previously Untreated for Stage IV Disease[NCT00865709]Phase 2198 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of TGR 1202 Alone and in Combination With Either Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine or With FOLFOX in Patients With Select Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors[NCT02574663]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-11Completed
A Multicenter, Randomised Phase II Trial on the Therapy of Advanced Gastric Cancer or Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients Older Than 65 Years With Specific Regard of Quality of Life and Pharmacogenetic Risk Profile[NCT00737373]Phase 2143 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Randomized Trial of the I-BFM-SG for the Management of Childhood Non-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia[NCT00764907]Phase 34,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Recruiting
A Phase I Study of BBI608 Administered With FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab in Adult Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02641873]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Two-arm Phase II Randomised Trial of Intermittent Chemotherapy Plus Continuous Cetuximab and of Intermittent Chemotherapy Plus Intermittent Cetuximab in First Line Treatment of Patients With K-ras-normal (Wild-type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00640081]Phase 2169 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Of Simultaneous Pancreatic Cancer Treatment With Enoxaparin and ChemoTherapy (PROSPECT)[NCT00785421]Phase 2/Phase 3312 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
seconD-line Folfiri/aflIbercept in proSpecTIvely Stratified, Anti-EGFR resistaNt, Metastatic coloreCTal Cancer patIents With RAS Validated Wild typE Status[NCT04252456]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-23Recruiting
Randomized Phase 3 Study on the Optimization of Bevacizumab With mFOLFOX/mOXXEL in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01718873]Phase 3230 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Guided Dosing Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) and Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients[NCT02573220]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study terminated by PI due to inability to accrue.)
AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT BEVACIZUMAB IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WHO HAVE RECEIVED FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS BEVACIZUMAB.[NCT00720512]Phase 3184 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated
Phase II-III Study Comparing Radiochemotherapy With the FOLFOX Regimen Versus Radiochemotherapy With 5FU-cisplatin (Herskovic Regimen) in First Line Treatment of Patients With Inoperable Oesophageal Cancer.[NCT00861094]Phase 2/Phase 3266 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With FOLFOX for Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (PHOX)[NCT06078709]Phase 299 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-20Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Two Neoadjuvant Strategies With Bevacizumab in Locally Advanced Resectable Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Non-Comparative Phase II Study[NCT00865189]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-23Completed
A Prospective Multicenter Study With 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel (FLOT) in Patients With Locally Advanced, Limited Metastatic or Extensive Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Esophagogastric Junction[NCT00849615]Phase 2252 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Does Folinic Acid Supplementation Decrease Homocysteine Concentrations in Newborns[NCT00877227]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation Guided Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-risk Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Cohort Study (FINE Trial)[NCT05954078]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Escalating Doses of Carfilzomib With Hyper-CVAD in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma[NCT02293109]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-17Completed
A Randomized, Phase 2 Study Of FOLFOX Or FOLFIRI With AG-013736 Or Bevacizumab (Avastin) In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure Of An Irinotecan Or Oxaliplatin-Containing First-Line Regimen[NCT00615056]Phase 2171 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Phase 3 Study of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Advanced Resectable Rectal Cancer Comparing Modulation of 5-FU With Folinic Acid or With Interferon-alpha[NCT01060501]Phase 3796 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-07-31Completed
Multimodality Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy, Organ Preservation Surgery, and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy[NCT00544414]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-07Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone As Adjuvant Treatment Of Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT00026273]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Multicenter Phase III Randomized Study of FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Following or Not by a Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00952029]Phase 2/Phase 3492 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 3-Arm Phase 3 Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafe[NCT02928224]Phase 3702 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-13Completed
Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiation With Concurrent Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Followed by Surgery and Postoperative 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and Bevacizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT00321685]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-25Completed
Intensified Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy (Dasatinib NSC# 732517) in Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)[NCT00720109]Phase 2/Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-14Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Liposomal Irinotecan in Older Patients With Treatment Naïve Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (GIANT)[NCT04233866]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01867892]Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Enrolling by invitation
A Pilot Study of Molecularly Tailored Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01888978]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Induction Regimen With mFOLFOX6 and Ziv-aflibercept for First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Followed by Continuation Regimen With 5-FU/LV Alone or With Ziv-aflibercept Until Disease Progression[NCT01889680]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Withdrawn
Ph 2 Trial of G-FLIP (Low Doses Gemcitabine, 5FU, Leucovorin, Irinotecan & Oxaliplatin), Followed by G-FLIP-DM (G-FLIP + Low Doses Docetaxel & MitomycinC), When Used in Combination With Vitamin C, in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01905150]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy and Toripalimab for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: a Single-arm, Two-cohort, Phase II Trial (TORCH-R)[NCT05628038]Phase 293 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-18Recruiting
A Phase III Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Maintenance Therapy With Avelumab (MSB0010718C) Versus Continuation of First-line Chemotherapy in Subjects With Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach, or of the Gastro-esop[NCT02625610]Phase 3499 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-24Completed
A Randomised, Cross-over Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Glucarpidase for Routine Use After High Dose Methotrexate in Patients With Bone Sarcoma[NCT02022358]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment almost complete, has been slow and challenging)
Phase III Randomized Study of Intensive Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colon Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence[NCT00005979]Phase 30 participants Interventional1998-07-22Completed
A Phase I Open-Label, Safety Study of Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) After Ex Vivo Treatment of Bone Marrow With Anti-B7.1 and Anti-B7.2 Antibodies[NCT00005988]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
Phase II Study Evaluating the Combination of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Herceptin in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Progressed After 5-FU and/or Irinotecan-Containing Therapy[NCT00006015]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of sufficient accrual)
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Three-Arm Study Of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Plus Leucovorin (LV) Or Oxaliplatin Or A Combination Of (5-Fu) LV + Oxaliplatin As Second-Line Treatment Of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00008281]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-10-31Active, not recruiting
Primary Prophylaxis of Cerebral Toxoplasmosis in HIV-Infected Patients[NCT00000643]Phase 2150 participants InterventionalCompleted
Pyrimethamine Pharmacokinetics in HIV Positive Patients Seropositive for Toxoplasma Gondii[NCT00000973]Phase 126 participants InterventionalCompleted
FOCUS 3 - A Study to Determine the Feasibility of Molecular Selection of Therapy Using KRAS, BRAF and Topo-1 in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00975897]Phase 2/Phase 33,240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Comparative, Double-Blind Trial of Trimetrexate (CI-898) With Leucovorin Calcium Rescue Versus Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole for Moderately Severe Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in Patients With AIDS[NCT00001014]Phase 3302 participants InterventionalCompleted
Study Of The Survival Without Degradation To The Quality Of Life During Chemotherapy For Metastatic Breast Cancer In Women[NCT00010075]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Study Of Bolus/Infusion 5-FU/LV (de Gramont Regimen) Versus Oxaliplatin And Bolus/Infusion 5-FU/LV (de Gramont Regimen) As Third-Line Treatment Of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00016198]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin (OXAL), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), and Leucovorin (CF) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated With Irinotecan (CPT-11)[NCT00016978]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Fluorouracil-Docetaxel Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Intraperitoneal (IP) Floxuridine (FUdR) Plus Leucovorin in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer[NCT00006038]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-02-29Completed
Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing the Combination of Cetuximab With Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA Versus the Combination of Cetuximab With Irinotecan/5-FU/FA as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Non-Resectable Colorectal Liver [NCT00153998]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of JMT101 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor.[NCT04689100]Phase 1259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-11Recruiting
A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Either Continuous Chemotherapy Plus Cetuximab or Intermittent Chemotherapy With Standard Continuous Palliative Combination Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and a Fluoropyrimidine in First Line Treatment of Me[NCT00182715]Phase 32,421 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Vorinostat [Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (VORINOSTAT)] With Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) for Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers[NCT00537121]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Adjuvant Oral UFT/LV to 5-FU/l-LV in Stage III Colorectal Cancer (JCOG-0205-MF)[NCT00190515]Phase 31,101 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Clinical Study of UFT/Leucovorin, Radiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab Following Induction Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PERU)[NCT01050426]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Data from other trials failed to demonstrate meaningful survival advantage)
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy for Potentially Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction[NCT00525785]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab Versus FOLFIRI as a Secondline Treatment in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma[NCT05015621]Phase 3194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-18Recruiting
Intensive Treatment for Intermediate-Risk Relapse of Childhood B-precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A Randomized Trial of Vincristine Strategies[NCT00381680]Phase 3275 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab for Patients With Unresectable Stage IV Colon Cancer and a Synchronous Asymptomatic Primary Tumor[NCT00321828]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Intergroup Randomized Phase III Study of Postoperative Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin vs. Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Patients With Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Receiving Either Preoperative[NCT00068692]Phase 3225 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-15Completed
A Multicenter, Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Of Sunitinib In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) As First Line Treatment[NCT00457691]Phase 3768 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Irinotecan Combined With Infusional 5-FU/Folinic Acid or Capecitabine and the Role of Celecoxib in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00064181]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
NEoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Versus Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With Salvage Surgery as Needed (NEEDS Trial)[NCT04460352]Phase 31,020 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-27Recruiting
Post-Approved Phase III Study of 1-LV/5FU Therapy[NCT00195572]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Prospective Study of Short Infusion of Ziv-Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01941173]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
A Phase I and Randomized Phase II Double Blinded Placebo Controlled Study of mFOLFOX6 +/- AMG 337 in the First Line Treatment of Patients With Her2/Neu Negative and High MET Expressing Advanced Gastric and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT02344810]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-06Withdrawn(stopped due to The study did not open to accrual. No start date and no completion dates.)
A Phase 1 Trial of MK-4280 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy or Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT02720068]Phase 1576 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-02Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Rituximab Given in Conjunction With Standard Chemotherapy in Primary Central Nervous System (CNS) Lymphoma[NCT00335140]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-23Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
Phase II Study of the Efficacy of Amifostine (Ethyol) in Reducing the Incidence and Severity of Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer[NCT00601198]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding support withdrawn)
An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Trial to Compare Cetuximab in Combination With FOLFOX-4 Versus FOLFOX-4 Alone in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Chinese Subjects With RAS Wild-type Status[NCT01228734]Phase 3553 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-09Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial of MEK162 in Combination With FOLFOX in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Failed Prior Standard Therapy[NCT02041481]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Intraperitoneal Oxaliplatin Alone and in Combination With Intraperitoneal Floxuridine and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Cancer Confined to the Peritoneal Cavity[NCT00005860]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Study of Second Look Surgery With or Without Chemotherapy Intraperitoneally, in the Event of Risk of Intraperitoneal Recurrence[NCT00005944]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-07-01Terminated(stopped due to insuffisient recruitment)
A Pilot Study of Dose Intensification of Methotrexate in Patients With Advanced-Stage (III/IV) Small Non-Cleaved Cell Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and B-Cell All[NCT00005977]Phase 383 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Phase III Study of An Optimized LV-5FU-Oxaliplatin Regimen in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. C99-1.[NCT00006468]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin (LV), Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Bevacizumab (Anti-VEGF) in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00006786]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Interracial Study of CPT-11 (Irinotecan) Pharmacokinetics in 5-Fluorouracil Refractory Colorectal Cancer: A Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study of CPT-11[NCT00006103]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
Randomized Therapeutic Study Comparing Tumor Resection Followed Immediately by Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy VS Systemic Chemotherapy Alone for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Peritoneum[NCT00006112]Phase 20 participants Interventional1996-01-31Active, not recruiting
Alternation of FOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin - Leucovorin - Fluorouracil) and FOLFIRI (Irinotecan - Leucovorin - Fluorouracil) as Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00006115]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of PS-341 in Combination With 5-FU/LV in Solid Tumors[NCT00007878]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Dose-Escalation, Phase I/II Study of Oral Azithromycin and Pyrimethamine for the Treatment of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in Patients With AIDS[NCT00000966]Phase 145 participants InterventionalCompleted
Vitamin B12 and Folinic Acid Supplementation in Mitochondrial DNA Deletion Syndromes[NCT06186154]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Exploiting Circulating Tumour DNA to Intensify the Postoperative Treatment of Stage III and High-risk Stage II Resected Colon Cancer Patients With Adjuvant FOLFOXIRI and/or Post-adjuvant Trifluridine/Tipiracil[NCT05062889]Phase 2477 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-17Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Placebo in Participants With Esophageal Carcinoma Receiving Concurrent Definitive Chemoradiotherapy (KEYNOTE 975)[NCT04210115]Phase 3700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-28Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial of Cetuximab/Bevacizumab (CB) as Palliative First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Followed by FOLFOX+CB vs. FOLFOX+B[NCT00571740]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to The study was not activated)
A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial of Avastin Plus Gemcitabine Plus 5FU/Folinic Acid (A + FFG) vs. Avastin Plus Oxaliplatin Plus 5FU/Folinic Acid (A + FOLFOX 4) as Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00192075]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Sequential Administration of Oral 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) After Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients With Relapsed Hodgkin's Disease (Phase II)[NCT00587873]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-03-31Completed
A Genotype-guided Dosing Study of mFOLFIRINOX in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies[NCT01643499]Phase 179 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-26Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Plus Atezolizumab Versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.[NCT03721653]Phase 2218 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-30Completed
S1313, A Phase IB/II Randomized Study of Modified FOLFIRINOX + Pegylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) Versus Modified FOLFIRINOX Alone in Patients With Good Performance Status Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT01959139]Phase 1/Phase 2126 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-23Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) or Localized B-Lineage Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (B-LLy)[NCT01190930]Phase 39,350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-09Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Neoadjuvant Short Course Radiotherapy Concurrent With Infusional 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT02270606]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-04Completed
Quadruplet 1st Line Treatment of CAPOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab for mCRC, Multicenter Randomised Phase II Study (QUATTRO-II)[NCT04097444]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-11Recruiting
Phase IB Study to Evaluate the Safety of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination With Multiple Standard Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy Agents in Patients With Advanced Malignancies[NCT02419495]Phase 1221 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-26Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Single Arm, Phase 1/2 Trial of Metronomic 5-fluorouracil in Combination With Nab-paclitaxel, Bevacizumab, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.[NCT02620800]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-18Completed
Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus Induction FOLFOX Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial[NCT04215731]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-27Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy, Including Calaspargase Pegol, for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies[NCT05292664]Phase 192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-29Recruiting
Phase I Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Oxaliplatin for Peritoneal Malignancies[NCT00625092]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Sequential Phase I Study Of The Combination Of Everolimus (Rad001) With 5-Fu/Lv (De Gramont), Folfox6, And Folfox6/Panitumumab In Patients With Refractory Solid Malignancies[NCT00610948]Phase 174 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Intensive Conventional Chemotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission[NCT00002514]Phase 31,929 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-05-07Completed
Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy of a New Standard Pre-operative Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer According to the FOLFOX4 Regimen With Routine Chemoradiation Therapy[NCT05378919]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-01Recruiting
Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After Nonmyeloablative Conditioning For Patients With Hematological Malignancies[NCT00627666]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Study of BAX2398 in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Calcium Levofolinate in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Which Progressed or Recurred After Prior Gemcitabine-Based Therapy[NCT02697058]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-30Completed
A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.[NCT02658214]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-28Completed
A Pharmacogenetic-Based Phase I Trial of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer[NCT00654160]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study of AZD2171 (Cediranib) With Modified FOLFOX6 in Patients With Advanced Biliary Cancers[NCT01229111]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Drug Supply)
Primary Surgery Plus Single Course Methotrexate Versus Primary Methotrexate for Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasms in Low Risk Cases Above 40y: a Randomized Controled Trial[NCT02606539]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of cétuximab Associated With the Protocol FOLFIRINOX (LV5FU Simplified Combined With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin) in the First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Expressing EGFR or[NCT00556413]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Effect of Folic Acid on Homocysteine Levels and Flow-mediated Dilation in HIV and HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT02810275]Phase 369 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Phase 3 Study of Irinotecan, Folinic Acid, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Plus Ramucirumab or Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Progressive During or Following First-Line Combination Therapy Wit[NCT01183780]Phase 31,072 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-02Completed
Phase II Multicenter Study of the Impact of the Therapeutic Sequence of Radiochemotherapy (50 Gy + Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin + Cetuximab) Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery Then Post-surgery Chemotherapy (FOLFOX 4 + Cetuximab) in Synchronous L[NCT00541112]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-29Terminated(stopped due to Toxicity and lack of efficacy)
Phase II Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Association of Chemotherapy LV5FU2 Simplified and Cetuximab With Intra-arterial Hepatic Chemotherapy Using Oxaliplatin in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Nonresectable Hepatic Metastases[NCT00544349]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of 5FU/Folinic Acid and Irinotecan as Second or Third Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, Unresectable, Colorectal Cancer[NCT00075595]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-06-30Active, not recruiting
Treatment Protocol of the Third International Study For Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis[NCT00276757]376 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Chemotherapy Intra-Arterial Hepatic With Oxaliplatin Combined With Leucovorin Calcium and Fluorouracil IV[NCT00006050]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-04-04Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line FOLFOX Plus Panitumumab Versus 5FU Plus Panitumumab in RAS And BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Elderly Patients[NCT02904031]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Irinotecan Liposome in Combination With Oxaliplatin and 5-FU/LV in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT04796948]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-08Active, not recruiting
The Ondansetron Premedication Trial in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis[NCT04169828]176 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-02Recruiting
Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial in Resected Stage 2 (Dukes B) Colon Cancer: 6-Month Infusional 5FU-CPT11 (+/- Folinic Acid) Versus Observation - Determination of Biologic Predictive and Response Factors[NCT00091312]Phase 31,976 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-06-30Active, not recruiting
Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX-6 as First-line Treatment for Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial[NCT04230187]Phase 3528 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Recruiting
Gleevec (Imatinib) Plus Multi-Agent Chemotherapy For Newly-Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia[NCT00618501]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Phase 2 Study to Improve Tolerance of Chemotherapy Involving Cetuximab and Multidrug FOLFIRI, With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Studies, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00559741]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial: FOLFOX in Combination With Binimetinib as 2nd Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers With MAPK Pathway Alterations[NCT05564403]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-05-07Recruiting
Phase Ib Study of Gevokizumab in Combination With Standard of Care Anti-cancer Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Gastroesophageal Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT03798626]Phase 1167 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-22Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Irinotecan Liposome (Nal-IRI), Fluorouracil and Rucaparib in the Treatment of Select Gastrointestinal Metastatic Malignancies Followed by a Phase Ib of First and Second Line Treatment of Both Unselected and Selected (for BRCA 1/2 and PALB[NCT03337087]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Multi-Institutional Efficacy and Safety Study of Chemotherapy With Selective Internal Radiation Treatment Using Y-90 Microspheres (CHEMO-SIRT) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis[NCT00408551]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Recruiting
Feasibility Study of mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin Combined With l-Leucovorin (l-LV) and 5-Fluorouracil) in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00209703]Phase 230 participants Interventional2005-01-31Terminated
Randomized Phase III Clinical Study Comparing Postoperative UFT+LV, UFT+LV/UFT and UFT+LV+PSK/UFT+PSK Therapies for Stage III Colorectal Cancer[NCT00209742]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Oral Capecitabine and Intravenous Fluorouracil + Folinic Acid (Nordic FU/FA Regimen) for Patient Preference in Colorectal Cancer[NCT00212589]Phase 360 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
[NCT01851941]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children[NCT00400946]Phase 3800 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
AZD8931, an Inhibitor of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB3 Signalling, in Combination With FOLFIRI: a Phase I/II Study to Determine the Importance of Schedule and Activity in Colorectal Cancer[NCT01862003]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Potentially Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-type KRAS and BRAF: Alternating Chemotherapy Plus Cetuximab - A Randomised Phase II Trial[NCT01867697]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Risk Directed Therapy for Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Randomization of Highest Risk Infants to Intensive Chemotherapy +/- FLT3 Inhibition (CEP-701, Lestaurtinib; NSC#617807)[NCT00557193]Phase 3218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-15Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel as Switch MANteInance Versus Continuation of First-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced HER-2 Negative Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers: the ARMANI Phase III Trial[NCT02934464]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
Open Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of IMC-11F8 in Combination With 5-FU/FA and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-6) in Patients With Treatment-naïve, Locally-advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00835185]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
An Open, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Trimetrexate With Leucovorin Rescue for AIDS Patients With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia (PCP) and Serious Intolerance to Approved Therapies[NCT00000714]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Etoposide Vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid in the Treatment of Patients With Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary Site[NCT00003558]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-08-31Active, not recruiting
Phase IB/Randomized Phase II Study of Folfirinox Plus AMG-479 (Ganitumab) or Placebo in Patients With Previously Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT01473303]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to CALGB 81003 closed about a week after it was activated because of withdrawal of support. No patients were registered on this study.)
Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating the Feasibility and Tolerance of the Combination of FOLFOX With Cetuximab and the Combination of FOLFOX With Cetuximab and Bevacizumab as Perioperative Treatment in Patients With Resectable Liver Metastases From Colore[NCT00438737]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multi-cohort, Multicenter Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Envofolimab in Combination With BD0801 Injection With/Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT05148195]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-22Recruiting
Phase II/III Study of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Predictive Biomarker in Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIA Colon Cancer (COBRA)[NCT04068103]Phase 2/Phase 31,408 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-16Recruiting
A Groupwide Pilot Study to Test the Tolerability and Biologic Activity of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC# 102816) to Chemotherapy in Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and KMT2A (MLL) Gene Rearrangement[NCT02828358]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of the Chop-Montak Regimen in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma[NCT00513188]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Withdrawn
Oxaliplatin-CPT-11-5-FU-Leucovarin + Bevacizumab and Cetuximab (OCFL-BC) as a Combination Regimen for Systemic Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma With Potentially Resectable Liver and/or Lung Metastases. A Phase II Study[NCT00513266]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-06-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Sunitinib With FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin) for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancers[NCT00524186]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institute)
Phase II Randomized Study Comparing FOLFIRINOX + Panitumumab Versus mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Selected by RAS and B-RAF Status From Circulating DNA Analysis[NCT02980510]Phase 2219 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Active, not recruiting
An Uncontrolled, Open-label, Phase II Study in Subjects With Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum Who Are Receiving First Line Chemotherapy With mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin/ Folinic Acid/5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) in Combination With Regorafenib[NCT01289821]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
International Collaborative Treatment Protocol for Infants Under One Year With Acute Lymphoblastic or Biphenotypic Leukemia[NCT00550992]445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
"Frontline Chemotherapy Reinforced for Cancers of the Colon and Rectum With Potentially Resectable Hepatic and/or Pulmonary Metastases: Association of FOLFIRI and ERBITUX"[NCT00557102]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase 3, Global, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Efficacy Study of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) Plus mFOLFOX6 Compared With Placebo Plus mFOLFOX6 as First-line Treatment of Subjects With Claudin (CLDN)18.2-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced Unr[NCT03504397]Phase 3566 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-21Active, not recruiting
Phase II, Multicenter Study Evaluating G-CSF as Primary Prophylaxis for Neutropenia Associated With First-line Chemotherapy Regimen FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Are Homozygous for UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism, the Pr[NCT00541125]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase 4 Study to Characterize and Evaluate Markers of Chemoresistance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00559676]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Clinical Trial Comparing Oral Uracil/Ftorafur (UFT) Plus Leucovorin (LV) With 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Plus LV in the Treatment of Patients With Stages II And III Carcinoma of the Colon[NCT00378716]Phase 31,608 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-02-28Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial Of Neoadjuvant Combined Modality Therapy For Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT00081289]Phase 2146 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase 1/2a, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Anti-tumor Activity of PEN-866 in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies[NCT03221400]Phase 1/Phase 2340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-29Recruiting
A Multi-center, Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Objective Response Rate of Bevacizumab in Combination With Modified FOLFOX-6 Followed by One Year of Maintenance With Bevacizumab Alone in Patients With Initially Not or Borderline Resectable Color[NCT01383707]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-12Completed
A Multicenter, Clinical Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI With Bevacizumab As First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02246049]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Hyper-CVAD Regimen in Sequential Combination With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Frontline Therapy for Adults With B-Cell Lineage Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia[NCT03488225]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-28Terminated(stopped due to the study was closed early due to competing trials)
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy With Folfirinox to Gemcitabine in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma[NCT02539537]Phase 3171 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-23Active, not recruiting
Preoperative Folfirinox for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma - A Phase II Study[NCT02345460]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Competing studies)
TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSING ACUTE LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA, A MULTICENTER TRIAL[NCT00002532]Phase 20 participants Interventional1993-01-31Active, not recruiting
A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING DEXAMETHASONE WITH PREDNISONE IN INDUCTION TREATMENT AND BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION WITH INTENSIVE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN ADOLESCENT AND ADULT ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL-4)[NCT00002700]Phase 3392 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Calcium Leucovorin (LV), Mitomycin-C (Mito-C), and Dipyridamole (D) in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT00003018]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Three Different Regimens of CPT-11 Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Compared to 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Colon and Rectum[NCT00003594]Phase 31,691 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum (Per 04/99 Amendment) Old Title: A Phase II Study of Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum Confined to the Liver[NCT00003834]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-FU, and Leucovorin for Carcinoma of the Nasopharnyx[NCT00004164]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-08-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and 5 Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer[NCT00004206]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-09-30Active, not recruiting
A UKCCCR Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer[NCT00005586]Phase 32,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
[NCT00378456]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Open, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial With Cetuximab /5-FU/FA/Irinotecan or Cetuximab/5-FU/FA /Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin in K-ras/B-raf Wild Type Patients or With Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA With or Without Bevacizumab in K-ras Mutant Patients as N[NCT01802645]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Concurrent HIV Protease Inhibitor Nelfinavir as Part of a Neoadjuvant Regimen in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01068327]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-05Completed
Phase II Study Of 5FU-Irinotecan-Cisplatin As First-Line Treatment In Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma Of The Esophagus[NCT00075738]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of PS-341 (VELCADE) in Combination With 5FU/LV Plus Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00098982]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Recurrent Ganglionic Colorectal Cancer Not Accessible By Surgery Treated Using Chemotherapy With Simplified FOLFOX7 Followed By Radiotherapy Combined With 5FU and Oxaliplatin[NCT00268333]Phase 239 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Study of First-Line Therapy Comprising Leucovorin Calcium, Fluorouracil, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Patients With Progressive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Duodenal-Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors[NCT00416767]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Multi-Center Phase Ib Study of Oxaliplatin (NSC #266046) in Combination With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Pediatric Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT00281944]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Phase I Study of High Dose Methotrexate With Simultaneous Trimetrexate and Leucovorin in Patients With Recurrent Osteosarcoma[NCT00119301]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan + 5-Fluorouracil + Leucovorin + Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment For Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00080951]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
An Open-Labeled, Non-Randomized Phase I Study of Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Administered With Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT00080990]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Preoperative Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy (5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin) in T3-4 Rectal Cancers - Randomized Trial[NCT00296608]Phase 3762 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-04-30Completed
A Randomized Pilot Study of the Activation of the Hemostatic Pathway by FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab With or Without Dalteparin in First Line Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00323011]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Terminated(stopped due to drug not available)
Systemic Oxaliplatin or Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Combined With LV5FU2 +/- Irinotecan and an Target Therapy in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Restricted to the Liver[NCT02885753]Phase 3348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
Phase II Study Of Rituximab And Short Duration, High Intensity Chemotherapy With G-CSF Support In Previously Untreated Patients With Burkitt Lymphoma/Leukemia[NCT00039130]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy of 5-FU + Leucovorin, 5-FU + Levamisole, and 5-FU + Leucovorin + Levamisole in Patients With Dukes' B and C Carcinoma of the Colon[NCT00425152]Phase 32,151 participants (Actual)Interventional1989-07-31Completed
Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase III Study of Adjuvant Therapy With Celecoxib in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Curatively Resected Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT00085163]Phase 30 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
"Phase-2 Study Evaluating Overall Response Rate (Efficacy) and Autonomy Daily Living Preservation (Tolerance) of FOLFIRINOX Pharmacogenetic Dose Adjusted, in Elderly Patients (70 yo. or Older) With a Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma."[NCT02143219]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab Versus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.[NCT00433927]Phase 3568 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Combination Trial of PS-341 and 5-FU/LV in Gastric and/or GE Junction Adenocarcinoma[NCT00103103]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated
A Phase II Trial of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP) and Systemic FOLFOX4 for Subjects With Metastatic Unresectable Colorectal Cancers of the Liver With ≥ 40% Hepatic Tumor Burden[NCT00103298]Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat) in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors[NCT00138177]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Randomized Phase II/III Trial Comparing Folririnox Association [Oxaliplatin / Irinotecan / LV5FU2] Versus Gemcitabine in First Line of Chemotherapy in Metastatics Pancreas Cancers Patients[NCT00112658]Phase 2/Phase 3342 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase I Study of 5-FU (Plus Leucovorin) and Arsenic Trioxide for Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00449137]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
5-Fluorouracil/Folinate/Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) (FLOX Regimen), Given Continuously or Intermittently, in Combination With Cetuximab (Erbitux), in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Phase III Multicenter Trial.[NCT00145314]Phase 3571 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of UFT/LV Therapy Versus UFT/LV + PSK Therapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Histological Stage IIIa and IIIb Colorectal Cancer[NCT00497107]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Recruiting
Phase I/Ib Trial of ATR Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Combination With FOLFIRI in GI Malignancies With a Focus on Metastatic Colorectal and Gastric/Gastroesophageal Cancers[NCT04535401]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-13Active, not recruiting
RACE-trial: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced, Potentially Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) A Randomized Phase III Joint Study of the AIO, ARO and DGAV[NCT04375605]Phase 3342 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-03Active, not recruiting
mFOLFOXIRI Versus mFOLFOX6 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Treatment With Oxaliplatin (FANTASTIC): a Multicenter, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04338191]Phase 3638 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) as Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy and/or Immunotherapy in Subjects With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma and Locoregional Gast[NCT03505320]Phase 2143 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-29Recruiting
Treatment of Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors (AT/RT) of the Central Nervous System With Surgery, Intensive Chemotherapy, and 3-D Conformal Radiation[NCT00653068]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-08Active, not recruiting
The First-line Treatment of RCLM With RAS Mutation Was Local Short-course Radiotherapy (SCRT) + PD-1+ Standard Therapy[NCT05640726]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Not yet recruiting
Post-Approved Phase III Study of 1-LV/5FU Therapy[NCT00195585]Phase 3650 participants Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase III Study to Evaluate the 3-year Disease-free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Colon Cancer Receiving Either Perioperative or Postoperative Chemotherapy With FOLFOX or CAPOX Regimens[NCT02572141]Phase 3738 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo- and Active Calibrator-controlled Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of SAR153191 Subcutaneous (SC) on Top of MTX in Patients With Active RA Who Have Failed Previous TNF-α Antagonists[NCT01217814]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to delay in the study and the impact on the development timelines, not due to any identified safety concerns)
A Prospective Randomised Open Label Trial of Oxaliplatin/Fluoropyrimidine Versus Oxaliplatin/Fluoropyrimidine Plus Cetuximab Pre and Post Operatively in Patients With Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis Requiring Chemotherapy[NCT00482222]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Recruiting
Induction Chemotherapy Before or After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group[NCT02363374]Phase 2311 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-25Completed
Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Time of Infusion for High-Dose Methotrexate, Administered as a Continuous Intravenous Infusion at a Dose of 6g/m² Per 24 Hours of Infusion Time[NCT00513981]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomised Phase-III Study Comparing Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Modern Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.[NCT01524094]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Correlation Between Molecular Phenotype and Response to Two Independent Treatment Regimens, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Patients With Localized Esophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT02392377]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Novel Phase I/IIa Open Label Study of IMM 101 in Combination With Selected Standard of Care (SOC) Regimens in Patients With Metastatic Cancer or Unresectable Cancer at Study Entry[NCT03009058]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-24Terminated(stopped due to Commercial reasons)
A Phase I/II Trial of the c-Met Inhibitor, Tivantinib, in Combination With FOLFOX for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors (Phase I) and Previously Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus, Gastroesophageal (GE) Junction[NCT01611857]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial PNET and High Risk Medulloblastoma in Children < 36 Months Old With Intensive Induction Chemotherapy With Methotrexate Followed by Consolidation With Stem Cell Rescue vs. [NCT00336024]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Weekly 24-hour Infusion 5-fluoro-deoxyuridine (FUdR)/Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel (Taxotere) as First-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma (IIT# 14065)[NCT00448682]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Terminated
A Compassionate Treatment Protocol for the Use of Trimetrexate Glucuronate With Leucovorin Protection for Patients With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia.[NCT00002102]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Observational Study of the Impact of Circulating T Regulatory Cells (Tregs) on Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC) Patients Treated With Standard Fluorouracil/Irinotecan/Bevacizumab First Line Therapy[NCT01533740]31 participants (Actual)Observational2012-03-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Large Cell Lymphomas in Children and Adolescents: Comparison of APO vs APO + IDMTX/HDARA-C and Continuous vs Bolus Infusion of Doxorubicin[NCT00002618]Phase 3242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-12-31Completed
Induction Intensification in Infant ALL: A Children's Oncology Group Study[NCT00002756]Phase 2221 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of AK112 and AK119 in Combination With or Without Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Microsatellite Stabilized (pMMR/MSS) Colorectal Cancer[NCT05846867]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-10Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Trial Comparing UFT+PSK to UFT+LV in Stage IIB, III Colorectal Cancer[NCT00385970]Phase 3380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Active, not recruiting
Pre- and Post-Operative Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin 5FU/LV Versus Surgery Alone in Resectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Origin - Phase III Study[NCT00006479]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Extended Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer[NCT00003049]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-05-31Completed
Randomized Phase III Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (cT3 and cT4NxM0)[NCT00004099]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Role of Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00008060]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine And Dexamethasone In Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin Plus 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin In Patients With Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer[NCT00008294]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Phase IB Study in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Evaluate Pharmacodynamic Effects of Erlotinib and Safety and Efficacy of Erlotinib in Combination With Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab[NCT00118261]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Phase I Study Of Weekly Paclitaxel In Combination With ORZEL (UFT + Leucovorin) For Advanced Non-Hematological Malignancies[NCT00009828]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Withdrawn
A Phase I Study of Weekly Gemcitabine in Combination With Infusional 5-Fluorouracil and Oral Calcium Leucovorin in Adult Cancer Patients[NCT00019513]Phase 1108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
Osteosarcoma: Outcome of Therapy Based on Histologic Response. A Collaborative Effort of the POB/NCI, Texas Children's Hospital and University of Oklahoma.[NCT00019864]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-03-31Terminated
A Phase I & Pharmacologic Trial Of Sequential Irinotecan As A 24-Hour IV Infusion, Leucovorin, & Flurouracil As A 48-Hour IV Infusion In Adult Cancer Patients[NCT00020488]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Pilot Study of an Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibody, Cetuximab, in Combination With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin, and in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00020917]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase I Study of Flavopiridol in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Malignancies[NCT00021073]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Groupwide Phase II Study of Trastuzumab (Herceptin) in Metastatic Osteosarcoma Patients With Tumors That Overexpress HER2[NCT00023998]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Mechanisms of Antifolate Efficacy in Arthritis[NCT00000395]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-09-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Oral Clindamycin and Pyrimethamine for the Treatment of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in Patients With AIDS[NCT00000674]30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase I Trial of mBACOD and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in AIDS-Associated Large Cell, Immunoblastic, and Small Non-cleaved Lymphoma[NCT00000689]Phase 118 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase II Randomized Open-Label Trial of Atovaquone Plus Pyrimethamine and Atovaquone Plus Sulfadiazine for the Treatment of Acute Toxoplasmic Encephalitis[NCT00000794]Phase 2100 participants InterventionalCompleted
Evaluation of Escalating Doses of Intravenous Trimetrexate as Therapy for Previously Untreated Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients With Subsequent Comparison of Intravenous and Oral Pharmacokinetics[NCT00000998]Phase 150 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized, Comparative, Double-Blind Trial of Trimetrexate (CI-898) With Leucovorin Calcium Rescue Versus Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole for Moderately Severe Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in Patients With AIDS[NCT00001013]Phase 3364 participants InterventionalCompleted
The Use of Modified BFM +/- Compound 506U78 (Nelarabine) (NSC# 686673, IND #52611) in an Intensive Chemotherapy Regimen for the Treatment of T-Cell Leukemia[NCT00016302]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Time Finding Study of Chronomodulated Irinotecan, 5 Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin as First or Second Chemotherapy Line Against Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00039208]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Clinicopathological Study In Burkitts's And Burkitt-Like Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00040690]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
An Open-Labeled, Non-Randomized Phase I Study of Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Administered With Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT00042874]Phase 177 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dummy, Parallel-controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Study of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome in Combination With 5-FU/LV as Second-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer After Treat[NCT05074589]Phase 3298 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-25Completed
A Phase II Trial Of IRESSA (NSC 715055, IND 61187) In Combination With 5-FU/LV/ CPT-11 In Patients With Advanced Or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer[NCT00052585]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase I/II Study of Oblimersen Sodium (G3139, Genasense) in Combination With Oxaliplatin, 5FU and Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) Regimen in Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00055822]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
European Study Group For Pancreatic Cancer - Trial 3[NCT00058201]Phase 31,030 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Three Chemotherapies: [Irinotecan + Oxaliplatin (Irinox)], [Irinotecan + LV5FU2] and [Oxaliplatin + LV5FU2] as First Intention Treatment in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00066274]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-07-23Completed
Drug Treatment for Bowel Cancer: Making the Best Choices When a Milder Treatment is Needed[NCT00070213]Phase 3460 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Phase II Of An Optimized LV-5FU-Oxaliplatin Strategy With Celebrex In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Optimox2-Celecoxib Study[NCT00072553]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Parallel Group, Open-label, Phase II, Single-stage Selection Trial of Liposomal Irinotecan (Nal-IRI) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid or Docetaxel as Second-line Therapy in Patients With Progressive Poorly Differentiated [NCT03837977]Phase 2102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-13Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study Of Oral Etoposide In Combination With ORZEL (UFT + Leucovorin) For Advanced Non-Hematological Malignancies[NCT00009815]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Withdrawn
Phase II Trial Of Gemcitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, And Leucovorin In Patients With Measurable Unresectable Or Metastatic Biliary Tract Carcinoma (Intrahepatic, Extrahepatic, Ampulla Of Vater) And Gallbladder Carcinoma[NCT00009893]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Study Of Gemcitabine, Leukovorin, And Fluorouracil Used To Treat Locally Advanced And Metastatic Pancreatic And Biliary Adenocarcinomas[NCT00010088]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-01-31Active, not recruiting
Treatment Protocol for T-Cell and B-Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma of the European Inter-group Co-operation on Childhood Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma (EICNHL)[NCT00275106]Phase 3600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Withdrawn due to an excess of toxic deaths)
A Non-Randomized Multicenter Phase I/II Study Of Active Specific Immunotherapy In Patients With Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT00016133]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
Phase II Study in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated With Oxaliplatin (OXAL) or a Combination of Irinotecan (CPT-11) and OXAL[NCT00016952]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study Of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Plus Immunotherapy For Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00020943]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Completed
A Children's Oncology Group Pilot Study for the Treatment of Very High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents (Imatinib (STI571, GLEEVEC) NSC#716051)[NCT00022737]Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Local Excision Alone or Local Excision Plus Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Small Distal Rectal Cancers[NCT00023751]Phase 2320 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Randomized Phase I/III Study Of Systematic Chemotherapy With Or Without Hepatic Chemoembolization For Liver-Dominant Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of The Colon And Rectum[NCT00023868]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-11-01Terminated(stopped due to redesign)
A Phase I Study Of ZD1839 (Iressa) In Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, And 5-Fluorouracil In Previously Untreated, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer[NCT00026364]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase III Prospective Random Assignment Trial of Regional and Systemic Chemotherapy With or Without Initial Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Patients With Metastatic Unresectable Colorectal Cancers of the Liver[NCT00020501]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Multicenter, International Study Comparing The Combination Of SU5416/Irinotecan/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Irinotecan/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Alone As First-Line Therapy Of Patient With Previously Untreated Metast[NCT00021281]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-12-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study: Hyperfractionated Pre-Op Chemo-Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT00021398]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study Of OSI-774 In Combination With Oxaliplatin, And 5-Fluourouracil In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00049101]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Intensive Induction Therapy for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Experience a Bone Marrow Relapse[NCT00049569]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Study of ZD1839 (Iressa) in Combination With Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (LV) in Advanced Solid Malignancies (Phase I) and Advanced Colorectal Cancers (Phase II)[NCT00025142]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab (NSC 704865), Oxaliplatin (NSC 266046), Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Versus Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Versus Bevacizumab Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00025337]Phase 3880 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Pilot Phase II Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of an ALVAC-CEA/B7.1 Vaccine Administered With Chemotherapy, Alone or in Combination With Tetanus Toxoid, as Compared to Chemotherapy Alone, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma[NCT00027833]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-12-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study of First-Line Therapy Comprising Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Leucovorin Calcium, and Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Versus Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride and Capecitabine (XELIRI) in Patients With Unresectable Met[NCT00423696]Phase 2145 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-23Completed
A Phase I, Pharmacological, and Biological Study of OSI-774 in Combination With FOLFOX 4 (5-FU, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin) and Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00060411]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase III Trial of Modified FOLFOX6 Versus CAPOX, With Bevacizumab (NSC-704865) or Placebo, as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00070122]Phase 32,200 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase II Feasibility Translational Research Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiation in Patients With Clinical T4 Rectal Cancer[NCT00070434]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to poor accrual)
A Multicenter Study of the Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibody Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Plus 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancers That Have Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy[NCT00066846]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Oxaliplatin (NSC 266046) in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for Patients Who Have Not Received Prior Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00039611]0 participants Interventional2002-05-31Completed
CLOCC Trial (Chemotherapy + Local Ablation Versus Chemotherapy) Randomized Phase II Study Of Local Treatment Of Liver Metastases By Radiofrequency Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone In Patients With Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastas[NCT00043004]Phase 2119 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Combination With Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Malignancy[NCT00043121]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Methotrexate and Thiotepa Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma[NCT00045539]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase I Pharmacologic Trial Of Infusional UCN-01 Given With A Weekly Schedule Of 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin[NCT00042861]Phase 10 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of Oxaliplatin (OXAL), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin (CF), and Cetuximab (C225) For Patients With Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of The Colon Or Rectum[NCT00056030]Phase 273 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Designed to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) With Raltitrexed or Oxaliplatin Versus no HIPEC in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer (APEC Study)[NCT02965248]Phase 3147 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
5-Fluorouracil-Leucovorin With or Without Carboplatin as Adjuvant Treatment for Primary Dukes B2-C Colon Cancer; Chronomodulated Versus Standard Administration. A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial of the GRECCR-Belgium (Study 03).[NCT00046995]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Prospective Study Comparing Three Regimens Of Eloxatin ™ Plus Fluoropyrimidine For Evaluation Of Safety And Tolerability In First Line Treatment Of Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer (Tree Study)[NCT00062426]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Dose Escalation First-in-Human Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Safety, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Preliminary Clinical Activity and Pharmacokinetics of AM0010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT02009449]Phase 1350 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-15Active, not recruiting
The ADAPTA Study: ADjuvant chemotherAPy After Curative Intent resecTion of Ampullary Cancer. A Pan-European Prospective Multicenter Double Single Arm Cohort Study.[NCT06068023]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-07-01Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Selection Study of Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel Versus FOLFIRI in Refractory Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma[NCT04205968]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Combination Nilotinib and Hyper-CVAD in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Philadelphia-Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Blast-Phase Lymphoid Lineage[NCT01670084]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No Accrual)
The TRIPLETE Study RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF TRIPLET mFOLFOXIRI PLUS PANITUMUMAB Versus mFOLFOX6 PLUS PANITUMUMAB AS INITIAL THERAPY FOR UNRESECTABLE RAS AND BRAF WILDTYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS[NCT03231722]Phase 3435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-13Completed
Randomized Phase III Trial of mFOLFOX7 or XELOX Plus Bevacizumab Versus 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin or Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01279681]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Phase II Study of Gamma Interferon (IFN-γ) Added to Bolus + Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (LV) +/- Bevacizumab (BV) in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00786643]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Single-Arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Phase 2 Study for the Evaluation of Biomarkers in Patients With Advanced &/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild Type KRAS Treated Biweekly With Chemotherapy and Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment[NCT01276379]Phase 2221 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Randomized Phase III Trial of mFOLFIRINOX vs. FOLFOX With Nivolumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic HER2- Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT05677490]Phase 3382 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-23Recruiting
Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a Comparative Randomized Phase II Trial[NCT03777813]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-05Recruiting
Study of Endostar Combined With mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Efficacy Prediction[NCT01832948]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Essai De Phase III De Chimiotherapie Par FOLFOX 4 Ou Par Une Succession FOLFOX 7 - FOLFIRI Chez Des Patients Ayant Des Metastases Resecables D'Origine Colorectale - MIROX[NCT00268398]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Phase II-III Study of an Optimized LV-5FU-Oxaliplatin Strategy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Optimox2 Study. C02-2[NCT00274872]Phase 2/Phase 3600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-01-31Active, not recruiting
Open Label, Randomised, Multicenter Phase III Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Radically Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of a Sequential Treatment (CPT-11+5-FU/LV --> TXT+CDDP) Versus a 5-FU/LV Regimen[NCT01640782]Phase 31,100 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A PHASE II Study of GM-CSF As Pre- And Post-operative Adjuvant Therapy For Stage II And III Colon Cancer[NCT00262808]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Intensive Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Pilot Study[NCT00416819]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Preoperative FOLFOX Versus Postoperative Risk-adapted Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Low Risk for Local Failure: A Randomized Phase III Trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group[NCT04495088]Phase 3818 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Recruiting
Open, Multi-center Phase I/II Trial With Mitomycin C in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid in Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer[NCT00289445]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Randomized Study of Classic vs Simplified Leucovorin Calcium and Fluorouracil With or Without Irinotecan in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00303771]Phase 3282 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of CT-2106 in Combination With Infusional 5-fluorouracil/Folinic Acid (5-FU/FA)(de Gramont Schedule) as Second Line in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Failing an Oxaliplatin Plus 5-FU/FA Regimen[NCT00291785]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
One-year Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase 2-3 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Oral Folinic Acid Treatment (1mg/kg/d) on the Psychomotor Development of Young Down Syndrome Patients[NCT00294593]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Effect of Add-on Anti-Toxoplasmosis Treatment on Parameters Defining Toxoplasma Gondii Infection and on Psychopathology in Patients With Schizophrenia or Major Depression Serologically Positive for Toxoplasma Gondii - Phase 3 Study[NCT00300404]Phase 340 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Essai Randomise Comparant Deux Stategies De Chimiotherapie Dans Les Cancers Pancreatiques Avances: LV5FU2 Simplifie + Cisplatine Suivi de Gemcitabine, Versus Gemcitabine Suivi de LV5FU2 Simplifie + Cisplatine en Can de Progression[NCT00303758]Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Explorative Trial to Investigate Catumaxomab (Anti-EpCAM x Anti-CD3) for Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinomas Prior to Gastrectomy[NCT01504256]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
An Observational Study of Avastin® (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy for Treatment of First-line Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma[NCT01506167]719 participants (Actual)Observational2012-07-06Completed
A Randomized, Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Onartuzumab (MetMAb) in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in Patients With Metastatic HER2-Negative,[NCT01662869]Phase 3564 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Treatment Strategies in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver-only Metastases CAIRO5 a Randomized Phase 3 Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG)[NCT02162563]Phase 3564 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IMC-1121B in Combination With 5-FU/FA and Oxaliplatin (Modified FOLFOX-6) as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00862784]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Feasibility of an Immediate Preoperative Chemotherapy Before Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Research of Gene Expressions Changes Induced in the Tumor, Predictive of Chemotherapy Efficiency[NCT01715363]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties)
An Open-label Randomized Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib in Combination With Trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 Versus mFOLFOX6 Given With or Without Either Cetuximab or Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Subjects With HER2+ Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT05253651]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-24Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing 5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin Versus 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab in Patients With Stage II Colon Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence to Determine Prospectively the Prognostic Value of Molecular Ma[NCT00217737]Phase 33,610 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-06Active, not recruiting
[NCT01758666]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Active, not recruiting
Short-term Folinic Acid Supplementation Improves Vascular Reactivity in HIV-infected Individuals: a Randomized Trial[NCT01768182]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
An Open Label, Multicenter, Dose Finding, Phase 1 Study of Fusilev® (Levoleucovorin) to Prevent or Reduce Mucositis in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Receiving Folotyn® (Pralatrexate)[NCT01789723]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn
A Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Combination With FOLFIRI After Progression on FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab in KRAS(Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) and NRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.[NCT01814501]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-01Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Dose Finding, Single Arm, Phase 1 Study of Fusilev® (Levoleucovorin) to Prevent or Reduce Mucositis in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Folotyn® (Pralatrexate)[NCT01820091]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Withdrawn
An Investigator Initiated Phase 1 Trial To Evaluate mFOLFOX6 With Selinexor (KPT-330), An Oral Selective Inhibitor Of Nuclear Export (SINE), In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02384850]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Terminated
A Randomized Phase II Pilot Study Prospectively Evaluating Treatment for Patients Based on ERCC1(Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1) for Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal, Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer[NCT01498289]Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Phase Ib/II Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer With Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR-Bispecific Antibody Armed Activated T-Cells (BATs) in Combination With Low Dose IL-2 and GM-CSF[NCT02620865]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for First-line Treatment of Patients With RAS/B-RAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase 2 Trial[NCT04425239]Phase 2151 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-21Completed
Open, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing CMAB009 Plus FOLFIRI Versus FOLFIRI Alone as First-line Treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-expressing, RAS/BRAF Wild-type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT03206151]Phase 3520 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-12Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Using Oxaliplatin,Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil[NCT02987699]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
A Single-Arm Phase II Study in Japan to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Administered Every Two Weeks in Combination With FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed During or Following an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen[NCT01882868]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
An Exploratory Study of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Based Upon Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression, KRAS and BRAF Mutation Status, and ERCC1 Expression[NCT01280643]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase 2, Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy, and Optimal Dose of ABBV-400 in Combination With Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, and Bevacizumab in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT06107413]Phase 2206 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-12Recruiting
A Compassionate Treatment Protocol for the Use of Trimetrexate Glucuronate (Neutrexin) With Leucovorin Protection for European Adult Patients (>= 13 Years Old) With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia[NCT00002103]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
An Open-Label Multicenter Phase 1b Study of E7046 in Combination With Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) in Preoperative Treatment of Subjects With Rectum Cancer[NCT03152370]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-17Completed
Phase II Study of Methotrexate, Mechlorethamine, Vincristine, Prednisone, and Procarbazine (MMOPP) as Primary Therapy in Infants or Young Children With Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors or High-Grade Astrocytoma[NCT00002463]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional1989-02-28Completed
FOUR ARMS PHASE III CLINICAL TRIAL FOR T3-T4 RESECTABLE RECTAL CANCER COMPARING PRE-OPERATIVE PELVIC IRRADIATION TO PRE-OPERATIVE IRRADIATION COMBINED WITH FLUOROURACIL AND LEUCOVORIN WITH OR WITHOUT POST-OPERATIVE ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY[NCT00002523]Phase 31,011 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-04-30Completed
Study of Promace-Cytabom With Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole, Zidovudine (AZT), and Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma, Phase II[NCT00002571]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-06-30Completed
LSA5 PROTOCOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA (NHL)[NCT00002691]Phase 20 participants Interventional1995-08-31Completed
PALLIATIVE LOCAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR NON-RESECTABLE LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CARCINOMA, A RANDOMISED PHASE III STUDY[NCT00002793]Phase 3336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1991-01-31Active, not recruiting
Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Azidothymidine for AIDS-Related Primary CNS Lymphoma[NCT00000723]45 participants InterventionalTerminated
Phase II Multicentric Randomized Trial, Evaluating the Best Protocol of Chemotherapy, Associated With Targeted Therapy According to the Tumor KRAS Status, in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CCRM) Patients With Initially Non-resectable Hepatic Metastases[NCT01442935]Phase 2256 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
MEGA (Met or EGFR Inhibition in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma): FOLFOX Alone or in Combination With AMG 102 or Panitumumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma FNCLCC-FFCD-AGEO PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20 Randomized[NCT01443065]Phase 2162 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
COordinated Nivolumab and IntraperiToneal IL-2 for Gastric CanceR With PeritOneaL Metastasis (CONTROL) Phase 1b Pilot Study[NCT05802056]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-29Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Zimberelimab and Quemliclustat Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT05688215]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-07Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Erlotinib and Modified FOLFOX-6 (5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin) in Previously Untreated Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia[NCT00591123]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Induction Chemotherapy With Taxotere, Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Concomitant Cetuximab and Radiation for Locoregionally Advanced Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Phase II Trial[NCT01467115]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomised, Open-label, Phase II, Dose/Schedule Optimisation Study of NUC-3373/Leucovorin/Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab (NUFIRI-bev) Versus 5-FU/Leucovorin/Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-bev) for the Treatment of Patients With Previously Treated Unr[NCT05678257]Phase 2171 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
A Randomised Phase II/III Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Preoperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer[NCT01924819]Phase 2/Phase 3574 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomised, Multicentre Open-label Study of Active Symptom Control (ASC) Alone or ASC With Oxaliplatin/ 5F-U Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced/ Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancers Previously Treated With Cisplatin/ Gemcitabine Chem[NCT01926236]Phase 3162 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
A Phase Ib/II Open Label Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NUC-3373, a Nucleotide Analogue, Given in Combination With Standard Agents Used in Colorectal Cancer Treatment[NCT03428958]Phase 1/Phase 2225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-16Recruiting
A Folinic Acid Intervention for ASD: Links to Folate Receptor-alpha Autoimmunity & Redox Metabolism[NCT01602016]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Non-compliance)
mFOLFOX6 Combined With Dalpiciclib(SHR6390) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (FIND): A Single-arm, Phase IIa Study.[NCT05480280]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-20Recruiting
A Phase II/I Open-Label Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Combination With Modified FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Good Performance Status[NCT03699319]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-07Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of l-Leucovorin in Combination With Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole in the Therapy of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in Patients With the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome[NCT00002002]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase Ib Trial of mFOLFOX6 and Everolimus (NSC-733504) in Patients With Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT01231399]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00000658]Phase 3250 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Study of Trimetrexate With Leucovorin Rescue for AIDS Patients Who Are Refractory to Standard Therapies for Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia[NCT00000724]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized, Comparative Trial of Trimetrexate With Leucovorin Rescue Versus Standard Anti-Pneumocystis Therapy Versus Standard Anti-Pneumocystis Therapy With High Dose Steroids for AIDS Patients With Pneumocystis Pneumonia Who Appear to Be Refractory to[NCT00000730]Phase 3240 participants InterventionalTerminated
Neoadjuvant Treatment With mFOLFOXIRI Plus Cadonilimab (AK104) Versus mFOLFOX6 Alone in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Control Phase II Study (OPTICAL-2)[NCT05571644]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-15Not yet recruiting
HR070803 in Combination With Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, Calcium Folinate Versus Nab-paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: an Open, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial.[NCT05751850]Phase 3522 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-13Recruiting
A Study of Trimetrexate Glucuronate (Neutrexin) With Leucovorin Protection for Patients With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia[NCT00002434]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase III Randomized Study of Radiotherapy Alone vs With Concurrent Chemotherapy With MTX or VBMF (VCR/BLEO/MTX/5-FU) vs Subsequent Chemotherapy vs Concurrent and Subsequent Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer[NCT00002476]Phase 30 participants Interventional1990-01-31Completed
HIGH INTENSITY, BRIEF DURATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR DIFFUSE SMALL NONCLEAVED CELL LYMPHOMA AND THE L-3 SUBTYPE OF ALL: A PILOT STUDY OF A MULTIDRUG REGIMEN[NCT00002494]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-05-31Completed
Pilot Study in AIDS-Related Lymphomas[NCT00002524]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-06-30Completed
Phase II Evaluation of Gallium Nitrate (NSC 15200) in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome[NCT00002578]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-08-31Completed
A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRAHEPATIC ARTERIAL 5-FU AND LEUCOVORIN FOR COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES[NCT00002692]Phase 3312 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-12-31Active, not recruiting
TREATMENT OF ISOLATED CNS RELAPSE OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA -- A PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-WIDE PHASE II STUDY[NCT00002704]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
PHASE III STUDY OF HEPATIC ARTERY FLOXURIDINE (FUDR), LEUCOVORIN (LV), AND DEXAMETHASONE (DEX) VERSUS SYSTEMIC 5-FLUOROURACIL (5-FU) AND LEUCOVORIN (LV) AS TREATMENT FOR HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CANCER[NCT00002716]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF A WEEKLY 24H-INFUSION OF HIGH-DOSE 5-FU PLUS OR MINUS FOLINIC ACID (HD-FU/FA) VERSUS HD-FU/FA PLUS BIWEEKLY CISPLATIN VERSUS FAMTX (5-FU/ADRIAMYCIN/METHOTREXATE) IN ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER, AN EORTC/AIO INTERGROUP TRIAL[NCT00002722]Phase 2135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study For The Treatment of Newly-Diagnosed Disseminated Anaplastic Large Cell Ki-1 Lymphoma and T-Large Cell Lymphoma[NCT00002590]Phase 2221 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-07-31Completed
RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CONCOMITANT PREOPERATIVE RADIO-CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT POSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CARCINOMA[NCT00002896]Phase 3774 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-09-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study in Adults With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Testing Increased Doses of Daunorubicin During Induction, and Cytarabine During Consolidation, Followed by High-Dose Methotrexate and Intrathecal Methotrexate in Place of Cranial Irradia[NCT00003700]Phase 2163 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Efficacy Assessment of Systematic Treatment With Folinic Acid and Thyroid Hormone on Psychomotor Development of Down Syndrome Young Children[NCT01576705]Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-02Completed
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy for Potentially Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach[NCT00003862]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Eloxatin in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00004102]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Pan-European Trials in Adjuvant Colon Cancer (PETACC-2): Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial of High-Dose Infusional 5-FU (+ or - Folinic Acid) Versus Standard Bolus 5-FU/Folinic Acid[NCT00004150]Phase 30 participants Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase III Study of 5-FU/Leucovorin With or Without Concomitant SU5416 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00004252]Phase 30 participants Interventional1999-11-30Completed
ALinC 17: Protocol for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A Phase III Study[NCT00005596]Phase 31,076 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin, CPT-11, 5-FU and Leucovorin in Patients With Solid Tumors[NCT00005068]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Resection of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma[NCT00052910]Phase 3546 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Pilot Trial of GI-4000 Plus Bevacizumab and Either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in Patients With Ras Mutant Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Either Newly Diagnosed or Previously Treated.[NCT01322815]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual rate)
A Phase III Trial of Irinotecan / 5-FU / Leucovorin or Oxaliplatin / 5-FU/ Leucovorin With Bevacizumab, or Cetuximab (C225), or With the Combination of Bevacizumab and Cetuximab for Patients With Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum[NCT00265850]Phase 32,334 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
An Open Labelled Phase III Adjuvant Trial of Disease-free Survival in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Randomized to Allocation of Oxaliplatin- or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy by Standard Clinical Criteria or by a Transcriptomic T[NCT05314998]Phase 3394 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Rate of Conversion to Complete Resection in Patients With Initially Inoperable Hepatic-Only Metastases From Colorectal Cancer After Treatment With Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine and Dexamethasone in Combination With Bes[NCT00492999]Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Active, not recruiting
Study of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01679327]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
Clinical Efficacy of Chemotherapy Combined With Cytokine-induced Killer in Treatment of Patients With Colon Cancer[NCT03084809]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-06Completed
Phase II Study of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric, Gastro-esophageal Junction, and Esophageal Tumors[NCT01928290]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-08Completed
Randomized Phase II Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With 5-FU/FA Plus Panitumumab vs. 5-FU/FA Alone After Prior Induction Treatment With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab and Re-induction With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab in Case[NCT01991873]Phase 2387 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Randomised Phase III Trial Comparing Hepatic Arterial Injection of Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres (SIR-spheres) Plus Systemic Maintenance Therapy Versus Systemic Maintenance Therapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Ca[NCT01895257]Phase 3162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Recruiting
Phase III Study in mCRC Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild Type Tissue and RAS Mutated in LIquid BIopsy to Compare in First-line Therapy FOLFIRI Plus CetuxiMAb or BevacizumaB (LIBImAb Study)[NCT04776655]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-30Recruiting
A Phase I, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Ascending Doses of AZD0156 Monotherapy or in Combination With Either Cytotoxic Chemotherapies or Novel Anti-Cancer Agents in Patients With Advance[NCT02588105]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-10Completed
An Open Label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib With Pembrolizumab or Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab and FLOT in the Neoadjuvant / Adjuvant Treatment for Patients With Gastric Cancer[NCT04745988]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-11Recruiting
The Impact on Recurrence Risk of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoinfusion (TAI) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma And Microvascular Invasion (MVI) After Hepatectomy : A Random, Controlled, Stage III Clinical Trial.[NCT03192618]Phase 3290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-01Recruiting
Phase II Trial of FOLFOX6, Bevacizumab and Cetuximab in Patients With Colorectal Cancer[NCT00100841]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Open-label, Single Arm Phase II Trial Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Life of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Liposomal Irinotecan Combined With Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Followed by Curative Surgical Resection in Patient[NCT04617457]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-10Recruiting
Phase II Study to Evaluatate the Efficacy of Gemcitabine Plus Erlotinib for RASH-positive Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Friendly Risk Circumstances[NCT01729481]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Pre-operative Bevacizumab and FOLFOX Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer[NCT01212822]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-27Completed
A Phase 1b Study of Irinotecan, Levofolinate, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) Drug Product in Japanese Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Progressive During or Following First-Line Combination Therapy With Bevacizumab,[NCT01286818]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Treatment Protocol for Relapsed Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma of Childhood and Adolescence[NCT00317408]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Treatment Protocol for the Use of Trimetrexate With Leucovorin Rescue for AIDS Patients With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia and Serious Intolerance to Approved Therapies[NCT00001016]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Phase I Study of Trimetrexate Glucuronate (TMTX) With Leucovorin (LCV) Protection Plus Dapsone Versus Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) for Treatment of Moderately Severe Episodes of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia[NCT00002120]Phase 120 participants InterventionalCompleted
AUTOLOGOUS, ALLOGENEIC, OR SYNGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN HODGKIN'S DISEASE, NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA, AND MULTIPLE MYELOMA[NCT00002552]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-10-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Immediate Versus Delayed Chemotherapy for Asymptomatic Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00002570]Phase 367 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-07-15Completed
Phase II Trial of Trimetrexate and Leucovorin in The Treatment of Recurrent Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia[NCT00002738]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
Chemotherapy and Azidothymidine, With or Without Radiotherapy, for High Grade Lymphoma in AIDS-Risk Group Members[NCT00000703]45 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Study of Neutrexin (Trimetrexate Glucuronate) With Leucovorin Protection for Pediatric Patients (Ages 2-12) With Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia[NCT00002317]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Postoperative Evaluation of 5-FU by Bolus Injection vs. 5-FU by Prolonged Venous Infusion Prior to and Following Combined Prolonged Venous Infusion Plus Pelvic XRT vs. Bolus 5-FU Plus Leucovorin Plus Levamisole Prior to and Following Combined Pelvic XRT P[NCT00002551]Phase 31,917 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-03-31Completed
EXTRAMEDULLARY RELAPSE AND OCCULT BONE MARROW INVOLVEMENT IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA: A PHASE III GROUP-WIDE STUDY[NCT00002816]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-12-31Completed
PROTOCOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES AND THE SEZARY SYNDROME[NCT00002557]Phase 23 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomised Trial Comparing Pre-Operative Radiotherapy and Selective Post-Operative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer[NCT00003422]Phase 31,800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-01-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of 5-FU/Leucovorin/Levamisole Versus 5-FU Continuous Infusion/Levamisole as Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Resectable Colon Cancer[NCT00002593]Phase 31,135 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-12-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Trimetrexate (Neutrexin), 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00003446]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Continuous Oral Administration of SCH 66336 and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV) in Patients With Advanced Cancer[NCT00003956]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-04-30Completed
Multicentre Phase III Comparing To Therapeutic Sequence: Folfiri Following of Folfox6 (Group A) and Folfox6 Following Of (Group B) For Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00003260]Phase 3109 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-01-31Active, not recruiting
TREATMENT OF ADULT ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA: PHASE II TRIALS OF AN INDUCTION REGIMEN INCLUDING PEG-L-ASPARAGINASE, WITH OR WITHOUT PIXY, IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PATIENTS, FOLLOWED BY ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION OR FURTHER CHEMOTHERAPY IN FI[NCT00002665]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-07-31Completed
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Infants Less Than 1 Year of Age.[NCT00002785]Phase 20 participants Interventional1996-07-31Completed
The Value of Dexamethasone Versus Prednisolone During Induction and Maintenance Therapy of Prolonged Versus Conventional Duration of L-Asparaginase Therapy During Consolidation and Late Intensification, and of Corticosteroid + VCR Pulses During Maintenanc[NCT00003728]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Window Study of Trimetrexate With Simultaneous Leucovorin Protection in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Metastatic Osteosarcoma[NCT00003776]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Versus Oxaliplatin (OXAL)/5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated With 5-FU[NCT00005036]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Completed
A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Namilumab (20 mg, 80 mg and 150 mg) in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid [NCT02379091]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Completed
CHEMOTHERAPY CHOICES IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER: A RANDOMISED TRIAL COMPARING 2 DURATIONS AND 3 SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER[NCT00002893]Phase 3900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-06-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid/Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT00003001]Phase 1/Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Preoperative Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Protracted Continuous Infusion 5-FU and Dose Escalating Oxaliplatin Followed by Surgery, 5-FU, and Leucovorin for Locally Advanced (T3 and T4) Rectal Adenocarcinoma[NCT00003799]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-05-31Completed
Phase III Intergroup Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) (NSC# 616348) Plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5-FU/LV) Versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Alone After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer[NCT00003835]Phase 31,260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-05-31Completed
Phase I Study of Gemcitabine (Gemzar) and UFT/Leucovorin[NCT00003925]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Low Dose Continuous Infusion Topotecan in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Advanced Malignancies[NCT00003331]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-01-31Completed
CPT-11 in Combination With Weekly 24 Hour Infusion 5-FU Plus Folinic Acid Relative to Weekly 24 Hour Infusion 5-FU Plus Folinic Acid Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00004885]Phase 3430 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RO5520985 (Vanucizumab) Plus FOLFOX Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02141295]Phase 2197 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Terminated
T-Cell Depletion for Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prevention in High Risk Matched and Mismatched Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation[NCT00005641]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-09-30Terminated(stopped due to low study accrual)
PROTOCOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT NON-TESTICULAR GERM CELL TUMORS[NCT00002489]Phase 20 participants Interventional1991-10-31Completed
MULTICENTRE TRIAL OF INTENSIFIED THERAPY FOR ADULT ALL (O5/93)[NCT00002531]Phase 20 participants Interventional1993-01-31Active, not recruiting
A PHASE II TRIAL OF NEOADJUVANT CISPLATIN-FLUOROURACIL CHEMOTHERAPY, SURGERY, AND INTRAPERITONEAL (IP) FLOXURIDINE (FUdR) PLUS LEUCOVORIN IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER[NCT00002783]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-05-31Completed
Modulation of 5-Fluorouracil With Trimetrexate and Leucovorin in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT00002955]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
Adjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer[NCT00003063]Phase 31,050 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1991-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Study of FOLFIRI Plus Panitumumab in Extended RAS Wild Type and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Acquired Resistance to Prior Cetuximab (or Panitumumab) Plus Irinotecan-Based Therapy and Who Failed at Least One Subsequent Non[NCT02508077]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-16Terminated(stopped due to Poor Accrual)
Non-Operative Radiation Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Lower Rectum (NORMAL-R)[NCT02641691]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-27Completed
Phase II Study of AVELUMAB and CETUXIMAB and Modified FOLFOXIRI as Initial Therapy for RAS Wild-type Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients[NCT04513951]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid and Folfirinox in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT02896907]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-18Completed
Perioperative Versus Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: the PREOPANC-3 Study[NCT04927780]Phase 3378 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-07Recruiting
Phase III Intergroup Prospectively Randomized Trial of Perioperative 5-FU After Curative Resection, Followed by 5-FU/Leucovorin for Patients With Colon Cancer[NCT00002525]Phase 3859 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-10-01Terminated(stopped due to The study was stopped before reaching its accrual goal due to slow accrual)
Dose Intensive Chemotherapy for Children Less Than Ten Years of Age Newly-Diagnosed With Malignant Brain Tumors: A Pilot Study of Two Alternative Intensive Induction Chemotherapy Regimens, Followed by Consolidation With Myeloablative Chemotherapy (Thiotep[NCT00003273]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-11-30Withdrawn
A Randomized Prospective Study of Early Intensification Versus Alternating Triple Therapy for Patients With Poor Prognosis Lymphoma[NCT00002835]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-10-30Completed
HIGH INTENSITY, BRIEF DURATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY ALL: A PHASE II STUDY OF A MULTIDRUG REGIMEN[NCT00002865]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-04-30Completed
Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Patients With Colorectal Carcinoma and Other Refractory Tumors[NCT00004005]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of PN-401, 5-FU and Leucovorin in Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach[NCT00004233]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase IV Randomized Study of Pyrimethamine, Sulfadiazine, and Leucovorin Calcium for Congenital Toxoplasmosis[NCT00004317]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-07-31Recruiting
ALinC 17: Continuous Intensification for Very High Risk Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (A.L.L.): A Pediatric Oncology Group Pilot Study[NCT00003783]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of CPT-11 and 5-FU/LCV in Patients With Previously Untreated Gastric Adenocarcinoma[NCT00005607]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of DKN-01 in Combination With Tislelizumab ± Chemotherapy as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy in Adult Patients With Inoperable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ([NCT04363801]Phase 2232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-29Recruiting
An Examination of Changes in Urinary Metabolites With Use of Folinic Acid in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)[NCT03771560]Phase 2/Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-15Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating Overall Survival With Therasphere® In Conjunction With 2nd-Line FOLFOX In Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Pancreatic Carcinoma With Liver Metastases[NCT01581307]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial of Pulse Actinomycin-D Versus Multi-day Methotrexate for the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia[NCT01535053]Phase 357 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-18Completed
A Phase II Study of Neo-adjuvant Therapy With Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil, Panitumumab (Vectibix) and Radiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction[NCT01307956]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Drug manufacturer - Amgen requested study stop, per DSMB observation in POWER trial)
FOLFOXIRI in Combination With GM-CSF and IL-2 (FOLFOXIGIL) Versus FOLFOXIRI as First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Phase II Trial by the FNF Team.[NCT03222089]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Another study enrolling the similar group of patient are ongoing)
PRIMIER*: Randomized Phase II Trial of mFOLFOX6/Bevacizumab With or Without PRI-724 as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02413853]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study drug supply issues)
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I/II Clinical Trial to Identify the Modufolin® Dose With Most Favorable Safety Prospect and Confirmed Ability to Mitigate High-Dose Methotrexate Induced Toxicity During Treatment of Osteosarcoma Patients[NCT01987102]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Intensive, Short-Course Combination Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Poor-Risk Nonlymphoblastic Lymphoma and Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia and in Patients With Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00002471]Phase 20 participants Interventional1990-02-28Completed
A Phase Ib/II Open Label, Multi-arm, Parallel Cohort Dose Finding and Expansion Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of NUC-3373, a Nucleotide Analogue, Given in Combination With Standard Approved Agents in Patients With Advanced Soli[NCT05714553]Phase 1/Phase 291 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-08Recruiting
Phase I Study of Escalated Pharmacologic Dose, of Oral Folinic Acid in Combination With Temozolomide, According to Stupp R. Regimen, in Patients With Operated Grade-IV Astocytoma and a Non-methylated Gene Status of MGMT.[NCT01700569]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to changing the standard of care)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of R-HCVAD/MTX/ARA-C Induction Followed by Consolidation With an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Vs. R-Bendamustine Induction Followed by Consolidation With an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Patients ≤ 65 Years of Age With[NCT01412879]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Bevacizumab With Pelvic Radiotherapy And Primary Chemotherapy in Patients With Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer: the BRANCH Trial[NCT01481545]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Phase 2 Study of FOLFOX Plus or Minus GDC-0449 in Patients With Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Carcinoma[NCT00982592]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Total Therapy for Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) I[NCT02553460]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Intrathecal and Systemic Chemotherapy With Radiation Therapy for Children With Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor (AT/RT) Tumor[NCT00084838]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Leucovorin in Patients Receiving High Dose Methotrexate, With or Without Voraxaze Treatment[NCT00634504]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Front-line Combination Therapy of Sunitinib Malate Plus Chemotherapy With Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for Rectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Non-Resectable Metastases: A Phase II Non Controlled Study. (SUREMETS)[NCT00936832]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to because the sunitinib showed futility in anotehr trial)
A Randomized, Three Arm Multinational Phase III Study to Investigate Bevacizumab (q3w or q2w) in Combination With Either Intermittent Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin (XELOX) (q3w) or Fluorouracil/Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) Versus FOLFOX-4 Regime[NCT00112918]Phase 33,451 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Cetuximab and Envafolimab Plus mFOLFOXIRI Versus Cetuximab Plus mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI as First-line Treatment for RAS/BRAF Wild-type, MSS, Unresectable Left-side Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial (CEIL)[NCT05959356]Phase 2198 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Cadonilimab in Combination With FOLFOXIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic MSS Colorectal Cancer.[NCT05839470]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-19Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Perioperative Chemotherapy With Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, Docetaxel and S-1 (LOTS) For Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma[NCT04999332]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-10Recruiting
NeoOPTIMIZE: An Open-Label, Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Adaptive Switching of FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel as a Neoadjuvant Strategy for Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic C[NCT04539808]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-27Recruiting
A Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cetuximab Rechallenge in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (RAS Wild-type) Responding to First-line Treatment With FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab[NCT02934529]Phase 3673 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Multi-Center, Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy & Tolerability of Aprepitant and Palonosetron for the Prevention of CINV in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients Receiving FOLFOX[NCT00381862]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Randomised, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Two-Treatment, Two-Way Crossover, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Onivyde (Irinotecan Liposome Injection) Manufactured at Two Different Sites Administered in Combination With Anti-Cancer Ag[NCT05383352]Phase 1122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-30Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial for Newly Diagnosed High Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Including a Stratum Evaluating Dasatinib (NSC#732517) in Patients With Ph-like Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Sensitive Mutations[NCT02883049]Phase 35,937 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study Of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy And Radiation In Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT00089024]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-25Completed
A Phase 2 Study of RO4929097 (NSC 749225) in Combination With FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab Alone for the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (NCI #8467)[NCT01270438]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Withdrawn
A Single-Blind, Randomized Phase I/II Study of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Investigation of Modufolin® (60 or 200mg/m2) Compared to Levoleucovorin (60 or 200mg/m2) in Tumor, Adjacent Mucosa and Plasma for Patients With Colon Cancer[NCT01681472]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Open-label, Multicentre Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) With 177Lu-Edotreotide Compared to Best Standard of Care in Patients With Well-[NCT04919226]Phase 3202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-21Recruiting
PHASE I TRIAL OF POST-OPERATIVE COMBINED ORAL UFT PLUS LEUCOVORIN AND RADIATION THERAPY FOR RECTAL CANCER[NCT00002801]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-04-30Completed
Standard Chemotherapy (CHOP Regimen) Versus Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas and Poor Prognostic Factors: A Randomized Phase III Study (MISTRAL)[NCT00003215]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin in Combination With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia[NCT00004127]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
First Line Infusional 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer or Loco-Regional Recurrency - Role of Chronomodulated Delivery Upon Survival - A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial[NCT00003287]Phase 3554 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Aminopterin in Adults and Children With Refractory Acute Leukemia Grant Application Title: A Phase II Trial of Aminopterin in Acute Leukemia[NCT00003305]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-07-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Docetaxel Plus 5-FU, Cisplatin and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT00004913]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
A Clinical Trial Comparing 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Plus Leucovorin (LV) and Oxaliplatin With 5-FU Plus LV for the Treatment of Patients With Stages II and III Carcinoma of the Colon[NCT00004931]Phase 32,472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
ALINC #17 Treatment for Patients With Low Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group Phase III Study[NCT00005585]Phase 3838 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Development of a Novel Folic Acid Wound Dressing to Enhance Nitric Oxide Bioactivity Required for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wound Healing[NCT04723134]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Protocol for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Better Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A POG Pilot Study[NCT00003671]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-12-31Completed
Prospective Phase II Study of a High Dose, Short Course Regimen (R-CODOX-M/IVAC) Including CNS Penetration and Intensive IT Prophylaxis in HIV-Associated Burkitt's and Atypical Burkitt's Lymphoma[NCT00392834]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Study of Sequential Administration of Oral 6-Thioguanine After Methotrexate in Patients With Langerhans Cell in Histiocytosis (LCH)[NCT00588536]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Cytosine Deaminase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination With Oral 5-Fluorocytosine and Leucovorin for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas[NCT02015819]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-07Completed
A Prospective, Multi-centric, Phase Ⅲ, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Adjuvant Therapy With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (AG) Versus Oxaliplatin Plus Folinic Acid and Fluorouracil (OFF) for Gemcitabine-R[NCT02506842]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
Randomized Double-Blind Phase III Trial of Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SOLARIS)[NCT04094688]Phase 3455 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC#: 772518) for Newly Diagnosed High-Risk B-ALL; Risk-Adapted Post-Induction Therapy for High-Risk B-ALL, Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, and Disseminated B-LLy[NCT03959085]Phase 34,772 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
Genotype-Directed Phase II Study Of Higher Dose Of Irinotecan In First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Folfiri Plus Bevacizumab[NCT02138617]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Active, not recruiting
Mature B-Cell Lymphoma And Leukemia Study III[NCT01046825]Phase 2/Phase 3128 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-09Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial Of Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab With Modified FOLFOX7 In Patients With Stage II And III Rectal Cancer[NCT01871571]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-02Active, not recruiting
Phase I / II Dose Escalation of Oxaliplatin Via a Laparoscopic Approach of Aerosol Pressurized Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Nonresectable Peritoneal Metastases of Digestive Cancers (Stomach, Hail and Colorectal)[NCT03294252]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-24Terminated(stopped due to The 34 patients included had all completed their treatment period under the protocol and the data could be collected to assess the main objective and the secondary objectives before the last theoretical follow-up.)
Open Label Randomized Bioequivalence Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Safety Profile of Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92) vs Bevacizumab (AVASTIN®), Both With FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, in First-line Treatment for mCRC Patients[NCT02069704]Phase 1142 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-29Completed
The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: A Randomized Phase II Trial Testing The Efficacy of Triplet Versus Doublet Chemotherapy to Achieve Clinical Complete Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[NCT05610163]Phase 2312 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-08Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant NIS793 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)[NCT05546411]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-06Terminated(stopped due to Novartis, the drug manufacturer of NIS793, notified Dana Farber Cancer Institute that they are stopping all clinical development of NIS793 in pancreatic cancer, effective immediately.)
A Phase III Trial of Perioperative Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer[NCT04340141]Phase 3352 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Study of mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy in Chemotherapy-naive Patients With KRAS/NRAS Wild-type, Incurable/Unresectable, Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer[NCT02394795]Phase 3823 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-29Completed
Study Investigating the Association of NP137 With mFOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma[NCT05546853]Phase 152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-28Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase II, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Onartuzumab (MetMAb) In Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, And Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) In Patients With Metastatic HER2-Negative G[NCT01590719]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Trial of CT-322 (BMS-844203) Plus Irinotecan, 5-FU and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00851045]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Phase I Study of Ursodeoxycholic Acid (Ursodiol)in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT00873275]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-11Active, not recruiting
"A Phase II Study of Liposomial IrinoTecan (Nal-IRI) With 5-Fluorouracil, Levofolinic Acid and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer nITRo Trial"[NCT03528785]Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-02Recruiting
Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Localized Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy[NCT04418895]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-13Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of resources)
International Protocol for the Treatment of Childhood Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma[NCT00006455]Phase 3885 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-26Completed
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents[NCT03020030]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-03Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Phase Ib/II Study of FOLFIRI Alone Versus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFIRI Plus E7820 as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01133990]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-04Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early as the combination of E7820 and FOLFIRI was deemed to be not tolerable, hence no efficacy analysis was conducted.)
A Randomized, Double-Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Administered Subcutaneously Every 2 Weeks in Patients With Non-Infectious, Intermediate, Posterior or Pan-Uveitis (NIU)[NCT01900431]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Single Agent MEK Inhibitor Trametinib (GSK1120212) Vs 5-Fluorouracil or Capecitabine in Refractory Advanced Biliary Cancer[NCT02042443]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
The Effect of Folinic Acid Rescue Following Methotrexate (MTX) Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis on Regimen Related Toxicity and Transplantation Outcome: a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study[NCT02506231]Phase 2/Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Chemotherapy (Doxorubicin, Methotrexate and Leucovorin) in Combination With Antiviral-Based Therapy (Zidovudine + Hydroxyurea) for AIDS, Immunocompromised, or Immunocompetent Patients With Relapsed or CNS Positive Epstein Barr Virus Asso[NCT01964755]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-21Terminated(stopped due to Investigator Decision)
FOLFOX Via Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HAI) Plus Systemic Irinotecan With or Without Bevacizumab Versus Systemic FOLFOXIRI With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Initially Unresectable RAS-mutated Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases: A[NCT05727163]Phase 2194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-29Recruiting
Tocotrienol and Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Randomized Phase II Marker Trial[NCT04245865]Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-26Recruiting
First-line FOLFOX-4 Plus Panitumumab Followed by 5-FU/LV Plus Panitumumab or Single-agent Panitumumab as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With RAS Wild-type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: the VALENTINO Study[NCT02476045]Phase 2224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
Steam (Sequencing Triplet With Avastin and Maintenance): FOLFOXIRI/Bevacizumab Regimens (Concurrent and Sequential) vs. FOLFOX/Bevacizumab in First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT01765582]Phase 2280 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-23Terminated
Phase II Trial of FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02497157]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-21Completed
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Immunotherapy to CA125 (Oregovomab) Followed by Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy & Concurrent HIV Protease Inhibitor Nelfinavir in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer[NCT01959672]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-06Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Potential of Concomitant Ramucirumab to Affect the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 When Coadministered With Folinic Acid and 5 Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors[NCT01634555]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00002525 (4) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B3/C Disease
NCT00002525 (4) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B2 Disease
NCT00002525 (4) [back to overview]5-year Disease-free Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B3/C Disease
NCT00002525 (4) [back to overview]5-year Disease-free Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B2 Disease
NCT00002842 (1) [back to overview]2 Year Disease-free Survival .
NCT00003298 (4) [back to overview]Best Confirmed Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT00003298 (4) [back to overview]Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Incidence on Step 1
NCT00003298 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00003298 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00004228 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival as Assessed by Time to Death
NCT00004228 (2) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00039130 (3) [back to overview]2 Year Event Free Survival
NCT00039130 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00039130 (3) [back to overview]2 Year Overall Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00041132 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00041132 (3) [back to overview]Response
NCT00041132 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00052910 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00052910 (2) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Toxic Death
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival, for Only Complete Response Patients
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Alemtuzumab (Phase I)
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) During Treatment With Alemtuzumab (Phase II)
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Proceed to Course V Within 2-6 Weeks of the Last Dose of Alemtuzumab (Phase II)
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]Failure Pattern
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Sphincter Preservation
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]3-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]3-year Disease Free Survival
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Positive.
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Negative.
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Comparison of the Increase in Cure Rate of High Risk ALL Without Causing More Serious Side Effects Between Interventions
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Overall Survival (OS).
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Event Free Survival (EFS).
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events Postoperatively
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Distant Failure Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Second Primary Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Local-regional Failure Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events Preoperatively
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Survival Rate at 4 Years
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Pain Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Neurology Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Hepatic Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Dermatology Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Constitutional Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]2-yr Overall Survival
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Pre-Radiation Therapy Chemotherapeutic Response
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3/4 Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Pulmonary Events
NCT00089024 (2) [back to overview]Surgical Exploration
NCT00089024 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity While Receiving the Study Treatment
NCT00096135 (1) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00096278 (2) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00096278 (2) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00098774 (4) [back to overview]4 Year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00098774 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate After Remission Induction
NCT00098774 (4) [back to overview]4 Year Progression Free Rate
NCT00098774 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental Status Evaluation at 4 Months
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival Rate
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01%
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Remission Re-induction (CR2) Rate
NCT00100841 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Rate
NCT00100841 (2) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Event (SAE) Rate
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Optimal Time Point for Advance Health Related Quality of Life Intervention
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) for Low MRD (Negative) Subjects by Genetic Subset (TEL/Trisomy Positive vs Negative)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-High Patients.
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival Probability According to MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival Probability (OS) According to Induction Day 29 MRD Status
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Health-related Quality of Life Relative to Physical, Social and Emotional Impairment
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Early Marrow Status (EMS) by MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Low Patients
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event: Final Analysis
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events: Final Analysis
NCT00112918 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events
NCT00143403 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rates
NCT00143403 (2) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Participants With No Residual Tumor After Metastatic Surgery
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (KRAS Wild-Type Population)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (OS)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (Chinese V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Tumor Response - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Tumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Toxicity - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response - A+FOLFOX4 - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Survival at 12 Months and 24 Months - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progressive Disease - Avastin Subgroup
NCT00192075 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progressive Disease
NCT00262925 (2) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00262925 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00265850 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00265850 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]Patterns of Failure
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]Change in Rectal Function Between Baseline and 12 Months
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]5-year Disease-free Survival Rate
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]Change in Oxaliplatin-related Neurotoxicity Between Baseline and 12 Months
NCT00303628 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Completed 12 Cycles of Treatment
NCT00321685 (5) [back to overview]Resection Rate for T4 Rectal Cancers
NCT00321685 (5) [back to overview]Resection Rate for T3 Rectal Cancers
NCT00321685 (5) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT00321685 (5) [back to overview]5-year Recurrence-free Survival Rate
NCT00321685 (5) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00321828 (1) [back to overview]Major Morbidity Related to the Intact Primary Tumor
NCT00335140 (1) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate - Locally Reviewed
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic Diabetes Insipidus
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Rates of Nutritional Toxicities
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Rates of Gastrointestinal Toxicities
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Median/Range of Patients for Total Quality of Life (QOL) Score, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and Processing Speed Index (PSI).
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Acute Adverse Events
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Secondary Malignancies
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic Primary Hypothyroidism/Subclinical Compensatory HypothyroidismHypothyroidism/Subclinical Compensatory Hypothyroidism
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic Low Somatomedin C
NCT00336024 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic Central Hypothyroidism
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Event Free Survival. EFS
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Event Free Survival
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00381680 (6) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effects
NCT00381862 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Emesis and no Rescue Therapy Within 5 Days of Receiving FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in the First Cycle of Chemotherapy.
NCT00392834 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Resection of Liver Metastases
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00399035 (7) [back to overview]Time to Wound Healing Complications
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival by Bone Marrow Day 18 Status
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Serum Asparaginase Activity Level
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Level
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-year Disease-Free Survival by CNS Directed Treatment Group
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival by MRD Day 32 Status
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Asparaginase-Related Toxicity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Infection Toxicity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Post-Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm II vs. Arm III + Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm III vs. Arm II + Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival up to 2 Years
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival in Months
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Response
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) EQ-5D Self-Report Questionnaire
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (EQ-VAS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MDASI-GI Symptom Interference Score
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Assessment Inventory of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (MDASI-GI) Symptom Intensity Score
NCT00462501 (1) [back to overview]Complete Pathologic Response
NCT00467142 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in Objective Response (Partial or Complete Responses)
NCT00467142 (2) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response
NCT00494221 (5) [back to overview]Objective Tumour Response Rate
NCT00494221 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00494221 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00494221 (5) [back to overview]Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size
NCT00494221 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00499369 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00499369 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00500292 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With an Objective Disease Progression Event
NCT00514020 (1) [back to overview]"Number of Patients With Each Response in Good Risk Genotype (Thymidylate Synthase Promoter Enhancer Region [TSER]*2/*2 or TSER*2/*3 Genotype [Low TS Expression])"
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00515216 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00525785 (1) [back to overview]Complete Pathologic Response Rate
NCT00544414 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT00544414 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Lestaurtinib-related Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2)
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on the Tumor Assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) Criteria
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00588536 (1) [back to overview]Determine the Incidence of Complete and Partial Response and the Duration of Response in Patients With Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) Treated With Sequential Administration of Oral 6-TG After MTX.
NCT00591123 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate of Previously-untreated Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinomas of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract When Treated With the Combination of 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Erlotinib.
NCT00591123 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity of the Combination of FOLFOX, 5-FU, and Erlotinib
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MDASI-D Symptom Interference Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MD Anderson Symptoms Inventory Diarrhea (MDASI-D) Symptom Severity Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
NCT00634504 (1) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Leucovorin
NCT00653068 (4) [back to overview]Toxic Death
NCT00653068 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00653068 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00653068 (4) [back to overview]Non-hematological Toxicity Associated With Chemotherapy: Grade 3 or Higher During Protocol Therapy
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Clearance of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Sunitinib
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Presented Objective Response: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css) of 5-FU
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC 0-24) of Sunitinib
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC Last) and Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ∞) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Predose Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinib.
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events According to Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE).
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sunitinib
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib)
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation
NCT00742924 (1) [back to overview]Limiting Toxicity
NCT00766142 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time
NCT00766142 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT00766142 (4) [back to overview]Mean Number of Adverse Events Per Patient, Within 30 Days of Surgery
NCT00766142 (4) [back to overview]30-day Mortality Rate
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective Surgery
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective Surgery
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Time to Resection
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Best Response (BR)
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Early Response Rate (RR) (Stratum 1 Only)
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) or Death
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Half-Life (t1/2) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Mutation Status
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Serum Anti-IMC-11F8 Antibody Assessment (Immunogenicity)
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vss) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response )
NCT00835185 (12) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Immunogenicity of Intravenous (IV) Aflibercept
NCT00851084 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)-Related Severe Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Serum Anti-IMC-1121B (Immunogenicity) at Day 1
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response or Partial Response [Objective Response Rate (ORR)]
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00862784 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Number of Cycles of Radiotherapy
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Second Cancer, Local or Regional Recurrence, Distant Metastasis, or Death
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Surgery
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tumor Sterilization Defined by ypT0-N0
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tumor Down-Staging (ypT0-pT2)
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local and Distant Recurrences
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Number of Cycles of Chemotherapy
NCT00865189 (11) [back to overview]Number of Cycles of Induction Chemotherapy
NCT00865709 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00865709 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00865709 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00865709 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT00865709 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Toxic Death Rate
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (Stable Disease or Objective Response)
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Vorinostat Pharmacokinetics
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival
NCT00942266 (7) [back to overview]Fluorouracil Steady-state Pharmacokinetics
NCT00954512 (2) [back to overview]Part 2: Number of Participants With Each Type of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-Determined Overall Best Response
NCT00954512 (2) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00957905 (1) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival at 16 Weeks After Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in ≥10% of Participants Following Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Best Overall Response and Objective Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Progression-Free Survival Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Progression-Free Survival: Sensitivity Analysis Including Clinical Progression After Administration of CS-7017 and Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil After Failure of First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00982592 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00982592 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00982592 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00982592 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicities (Grade 3 and Higher)
NCT00982592 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicities (grades1 and 2)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Parameter
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examinations
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Ramucirumab
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) for B-LLy Patients
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) for B-LLy Patients
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Methotrexate Dose Randomization
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS in Low Risk (LR) Patients Based on Randomization to 1 of 2 Low-intensity Regimens
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Pulse Frequency Randomization
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS for SR Down Syndrome Patients With Standardized Treatment and Enhanced Supportive Care
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Sample Collection of Central Path Review Slides in B-LLy Patients
NCT01212822 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01212822 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01212822 (4) [back to overview]Complete and Partial Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT01212822 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT01217814 (1) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Serum Concentration of Functional and Bound Sarilumab
NCT01228734 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT01228734 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time
NCT01228734 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT01228734 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Curative Surgery of Liver Metastases
NCT01228734 (5) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01229111 (4) [back to overview]The Response Rate of Patients Evaluated Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
NCT01229111 (4) [back to overview]Estimation of Overall Survival
NCT01229111 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01229111 (4) [back to overview]Tabulation of the Toxicity Profile of the Combination Therapy
NCT01231399 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01231399 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subject With Overall Response
NCT01231399 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01231399 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Everolimus
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival Defined From the Date of First Induction Complete Response (CR) to Relapse or Death Due to Any Cause
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Feasibility of Maintenance Therapy in This Patient Population (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR). Feasibility Will be Defined as the Number of Deaths Ocuring.
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Probability of Being BCR-ABL Negative in the Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood at the Completion of the CNS Prophylaxis Course (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Response
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Response Duration
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Secondary Biomarkers Analysis
NCT01279681 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01279681 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate, Defined as the Percentage of Patients in Each Arm Who Have an Objective Status of Complete Response or Partial Response, Confirmed by a Second Assessment Measured at Least 6 Weeks From the Initial Assessment
NCT01279681 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 Adverse Events At Least Possibly Related to Treatment
NCT01279681 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ramucirumab Drug-Related Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Best Overall Response [Anti-Tumor Activity of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)]
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced Any Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT) During the DLT Assessment Period
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serum Anti-IMC-1121B Antibodies (Immunogenicity)
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Half Life (t1/2) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ramucirumab
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control (DC)
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response (OR)
NCT01289821 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (DOSD)
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Severe Adverse Events
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Drug Metabolism
NCT01307956 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01307956 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01307956 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Can Undergo Resection
NCT01307956 (4) [back to overview]Complete Pathological Response (pCR) Rate
NCT01322815 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Alive and Free of Progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients)
NCT01333033 (5) [back to overview]pCR Compared Between Induction Treatment Arms Among PET/CT Responders
NCT01333033 (5) [back to overview]PET/CT Response Between Treatment Arms
NCT01333033 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Among PET/CT Non-responders Within Each Induction Treatment Group
NCT01333033 (5) [back to overview]Complete Pathological Response (pCR) of PET/CT Non-responders
NCT01333033 (5) [back to overview]pCR Compared Among Non-responders Between Induction Treatment Arms if Treatment Regimens Are Found to be Efficacious
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Per-protocol Analysis Set (PPAS)
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving No Residual Tumor (R0)/Surgical Margin With Microscopic Residual Tumor (R1) Liver Resection
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Interval (DFI)
NCT01383707 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Complete Tumor Regression Rate (TRG1)
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Patients With Metastatic Lymphnodes at Pathology Exam After Surgery
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Sphincter Preservation
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01481545 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]PFS Variation by ERCC1
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) in High-ERCC1 Patients
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]PFS in Low-ERCC1 Participants
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) After Baseline Visit.
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) at Baseline
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Post Protocol Multi-agent Chemotherapy Treatment for Each Arm.
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Post Protocol Surgical Treatment for Each Arm.
NCT01535053 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CTCAE v4 Graded Adverse Events With Low-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia by Arm
NCT01576705 (2) [back to overview]GMDS (Griffiths Mental Development Scale)
NCT01576705 (2) [back to overview]BL (Brunet Lezine Revised Scale)
NCT01581307 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01581307 (3) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01581307 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01611857 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression in Phase II Dose Expansion
NCT01611857 (4) [back to overview]The Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Phase I Dose Escalation
NCT01611857 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival in Phase II Dose Expansion
NCT01611857 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Phase II Dose Expansion
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] in Cycle 1
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 1
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Cmax of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized AUC(0-∞) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2
NCT01666730 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01666730 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR) Objective Tumor Response Based on Computed Tomography (CT) Scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT01666730 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria
NCT01666730 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Computed Tomography (CT) Scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans According to RECIST
NCT01666730 (5) [back to overview]Number of Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities According to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(Last) of [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(Last) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(Last) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Cmax of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Plasma
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(Last) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Tumor Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-THF in Tumor Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(1/2) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(1/2) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(1/2) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Tmax of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]T(1/2) of [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]S-Folate Concentration
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Number of AEs Per Severity
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Homocystein Concentration
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Gene Expression Ratios (Mucosa:Tumor)
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Correlation of Gene Expression in Tumor and Adjacent Mucosa
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(0-2h) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(0-2h) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(0-2h) of [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(0-2h) of [6SR]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(Last) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Cmax of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Cmax of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Plasma
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Cmax of [6S]-5-THF in Plasma
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in Tumor Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Tumor Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Concentration of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Change in S-Folate Concentration From Screening
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Change in Homocystein Concentration From Screening
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Tmax of [6S]-5-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Tmax of [6S]-5-methyl-THF
NCT01681472 (43) [back to overview]Tmax of [6S]-5-formyl-THF
NCT01718873 (5) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT01718873 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01718873 (5) [back to overview]Toxic Effects
NCT01718873 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01718873 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Time to PFS2
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response During First-Line Therapy (ORR1)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival During First-Line Therapy (PFS1)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Considered by the Investigator to be Unresectable on Study Enrollment Who Subsequently Underwent Attempted Curative Resections of Metastases
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Underwent Liver Metastases Resections
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Tmax) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept in Cycle 1: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Steady State Drug Concentration (Css) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Aflibercept Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Active Metabolite SN-38 / Irinotecan Ratio on Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (Rmet): Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Clearance at Steady State (CLss) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving R0 Resection (R0 Resection Rate)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Able to Undergo Resection
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Toxicities Associated With Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Vascular Reconstruction
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in CRT at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) At Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VH Scale at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Score = 0 or At Least 2-step Reduction in Score at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 2-step Reduction in Vitreous Haze (VH) or Prednisone Dose <10 mg/Day at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prednisone Dose of ≤5 mg/Day (or Equivalent Oral Corticosteroid) at Week 16
NCT01900431 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment: Serum Functional Sarilumab Concentration
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Objective Response
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity and Tolerability (Arm A and Arm B) as Measured by the Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Survival
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial)
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01959672 (5) [back to overview]Distant Failure-free Survival
NCT01959672 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01959672 (5) [back to overview]Surgical Complete Resection (Negative Margin) Rate
NCT01959672 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CA-125-Specific T-cell Signal.
NCT01959672 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progressive Disease,
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]One-Year Rate of Failure-Free Survival (FFS)
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]One-year Rate of Overall Survival
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Response to Protocol Therapy
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]HIV Viral Load in Positive Subjects Before, During and After Protocol Therapy
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Toxicity Related to Protocol Therapy
NCT01964755 (6) [back to overview]T-Cell Subset Levels in Peripheral Blood in Positive Participants Before, During and After Protocol Therapy
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of AEs Per Severity (All Courses)
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Grade A1, Grade A2, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D Excretion Toxicities as Listed in the MTX-toxicity Management Instructions
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Ongoing AEs Per HDMTX Course
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed Late MTX Elimination (Definition F).
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed MTX Elimination (Definition D).
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Characterization (Number/Severity) of All Reported AEs During the ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD.
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed Early MTX Elimination (Definition E).
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Administered MAP Cycles Classified as Having Met the Criteria for Successful Advancement From First to Second HDMTX Course Within the Same MAP Cycle According to Definition A.
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Time to Successful MTX Elimination (Definition C)
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Ongoing HDMTX Related AEs Per HDMTX Course
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Administered HDMTX Courses Classified as Having Met the Criteria for Successful Advancement According to Definition A and/or Definition B
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of Administered MAP Cycles Classified as Having Met the Criteria for Successful Advancement to Next MAP Cycle According to Definition B.
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of HDMTX Courses in Which the Initial Hydration Was Increased
NCT01987102 (14) [back to overview]Number of HDMTX Related AEs Per Severity (All Courses)
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Mechanical Issues With Repeat Administrations of NSCs Via Rickham
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Average Steady State Levels of 5-FC and 5-FU in the Brain
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Developing Antibodies Against NSCs
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Average Steady State Levels of 5-FC Concentrations in Plasma
NCT02015819 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of 5-FC in the Brain to 5-FC in the Plasma
NCT02042443 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT02042443 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02042443 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02042443 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vd) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Ctrough,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Ctrough,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Cmax,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Cmax,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported With BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]AUC at Steady State (AUCss) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) at Cycle 1 (AUC0-336h) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHAs) Against Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Cmax Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Plasma Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed Using RECIST v. 1.1
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Clast) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (ORR) as Assessed Using RECIST v. 1.1
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS), Time to Event
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Plasma Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Vanucizumab
NCT02141295 (14) [back to overview]Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Vanucizumab
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Skin Toxicity
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity Graded Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival Rate (PFS Rate) at 9 Months After Randomization
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02337946 (9) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR)
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR 50) and 70% (ACR70) Response at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Pain as Measured Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]ACR Numeric (N) Index (ACRn) at Week 12
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]ACR Numeric (N) Index (ACRn) at Week 24
NCT02379091 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 6, and 10
NCT02384850 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events
NCT02384850 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Still Alive at End of Study (Overall Survival)
NCT02384850 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02384850 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02384850 (5) [back to overview]Numbers of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Left-sided Tumors
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in All Participants
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]OS in Participants With Left-sided Tumors
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT02394795 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Treated With Curative Surgical Resection After Chemotherapy
NCT02508077 (1) [back to overview]4-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT02553460 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicity (CTCAE Version 4.0)
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Composite Index Score up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (EORTC QLQ-STO22 ) Questionnaire Scores up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Scale Score up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score to 1 or Higher Than 1
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Grade Change From Baseline to Worst On-Treatment Grade 4 Hematology Values
NCT02625610 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Visual Analogue Scale up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Number of Any Grade 3 or Higher Toxicities
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Number of Post Chemotherapy Grade 3 or Higher Toxicities
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02641691 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire
NCT02730546 (1) [back to overview]Pathological Complete Response (PathCR) Rate
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate, ORR
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT02896907 (1) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life as Defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1 of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Final Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Interim Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for a Metabolite of Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Interim Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift in Visual Acuity Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Score
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shifts in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline to Maximum Grade On-treatment
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Final Analysis
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]AUC (0-24) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to t (AUC[0-t]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 (AUC[0-24]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution Following Oral Dosing (Vd/F) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Apparent Clearance Following Oral Dosing (CL/F) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) at Indicated Time Points
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Specific Gravity at Indicated Time Points
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameter
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate by Fredericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of ECG Parameter: ECG Mean Heart Rate
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Sodium, Calcium, Potassium, and Urea.
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine.
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelet and Leukocytes
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Reticulocytes
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Vd/F of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Tmax of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]T1/2 of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]Cmax of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]CL/F of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03258762 (36) [back to overview]AUC (0-t) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants
NCT03488225 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03488225 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity
NCT03488225 (5) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival
NCT03488225 (5) [back to overview]Participants to Achieve Complete Remission (CR):
NCT03488225 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03518112 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03518112 (5) [back to overview]Participants With a Response
NCT03518112 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT03518112 (5) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) Where Events Defined as no Response, Loss of Response, or Death
NCT03518112 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival Events in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Overall Survival by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With DC According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive ADA to Durvalumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival Events by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Oleclumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Oleclumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Nab-paclitaxel
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Gemcitabine and Metabolite 2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU)
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) in Dose Escalation Phase
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Oleclumab
NCT03611556 (31) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase
NCT03771560 (5) [back to overview]Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) - Parent Reported Change
NCT03771560 (5) [back to overview]Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) - Parent Reported Change
NCT03771560 (5) [back to overview]Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) - Teacher Reported Change
NCT03771560 (5) [back to overview]Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) - Parent Reported Change
NCT03771560 (5) [back to overview]Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) - Teacher Reported Change

5-year Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B3/C Disease

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or last date known alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year OS rate (NCT00002525)
Timeframe: every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually until year 15 after randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Perioperative 5-FU0.666
No Perioperative 5-FU0.612

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B2 Disease

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or last date known alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year OS rate (NCT00002525)
Timeframe: every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually until year 15 after randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Perioperative 5-FU0.851
No Perioperative 5-FU0.780

[back to top]

5-year Disease-free Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B3/C Disease

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second invasive primary cancer, or deaths, whichever occurred first. Patients who were still alive and had no DFS events were censored at the last disease assessment date known to be free of DFS events. Patients without any follow up data were censored at random assignment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year DFS rate. (NCT00002525)
Timeframe: every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually until year 15 after randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Perioperative 5-FU0.582
No Perioperative 5-FU0.543

[back to top]

5-year Disease-free Survival Rate in Patients With Dukes' B2 Disease

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second invasive primary cancer, or deaths, whichever occurred first. Patients who were still alive and had no DFS events were censored at the last disease assessment date known to be free of DFS events. Patients without any follow up data were censored at random assignment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year DFS rate. (NCT00002525)
Timeframe: every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually until year 15 after randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Perioperative 5-FU0.749
No Perioperative 5-FU0.724

[back to top]

2 Year Disease-free Survival .

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Disease free survival, defined as first documented evidence of treatment failure. Acceptable evidence includes: Anastomotic - positive cytology or biopsy; Abdominal, pelvic and retroperitoneal nodes - progressively enlarging node as evidenced by 2 CT scans separated by at least a 4 week interval, ureteral obstruction in the presence of a mass as documented on CT scan; Peritoneum - positive cytology or biopsy, progressively enlarged intraperitoneal solid mass as evidenced by 2 CT scans separated by at least 4 weeks; Ascites - positive cytology or biopsy; Liver - positive cytology or biopsy; Pelvic mass - positive cytology or biopsy, progressively enlarging intrapelvic solid mass as evidenced by 2 CT scans separated by at least 4 weeks; Abdominal wall - positive cytology or biopsy; Lung - positive cytology or biopsy or presence of multiple pulmonary nodules; Bone marrow - positive cytology, aspiration or biopsy. (NCT00002842)
Timeframe: 2 years after treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hepatic Resection/Portal Vein FUdr/Systemic 5-FU & Leucovorin9

[back to top]

Best Confirmed Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy

Response was based on pathology at surgery. A patient achieved complete response if no gross or microscopic tumor were identified with the surgical specimen and nodal tissue. Stable response was defined as a response that did not qualify as complete response or progressive disease (PD), where PD indicated metastatic spread. Best confirmed response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with complete response (CR). A patient was considered unevaluable if the patient did not have surgery, the pathologist did not examine at least 15 lymph nodes, or the pathology report was unavailable. (NCT00003298)
Timeframe: Assessed at surgery time (surgery performed during week 8-10 after registration to the study)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental Arm0

[back to top]

Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Incidence on Step 1

Incidence is defined as proportion of patients with any grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities among all treated patients. (NCT00003298)
Timeframe: assessed at the end of every cycle (cycle=21 days) during treatment (3 cycles in total)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental Arm65.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from registration to death, where a subject was censored on date of last record alive. (NCT00003298)
Timeframe: assessed every month for the first 3 months, every 3 months for the next 21 months, every 6 months for the next year, and annually thereafter up to year 10

Interventionyears (Median)
Experimental Arm1.55

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from registration until progression, recurrence, or death, whichever occurred first. If date of death occurred beyond three months from the date of last disease assessment, then PFS was censored at date of last disease assessment. Patients who were alive and progression-free were censored at the date of last disease evaluation. (NCT00003298)
Timeframe: assessed every month for the first 3 months, every 3 months for the next 21 months, every 6 months for the next year, and annually thereafter up to year 10

Interventionyears (Median)
Experimental Arm0.68

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival as Assessed by Time to Death

Overall survival will be computed by measuring the rate of deaths during induction due primarily to treatment toxicity and cumulative incidence of toxic deaths in induction or deaths in remission overall and separately for treatment groups defined by the two design factors. (NCT00004228)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A0 (Localized Disease Stg I/II) Modified CCG BFM96
A1 (Disseminated, No CNS - CCG Mod BFM w/Out Intens84
A2 (Disseminated, No CNS - CCG Mod BFM w/Intens88
B2 (CNS+) NHL/BFM-95 w/Intens Delayed Radiation Therapy81
B2 (Disseminated,CNS- (< Amend 7B)) NHL/BFM-95 w/Intens85
B1 (Disseminated CNS-) NHL/BFM-95 w/Out Intens85
B1 (NHL/BFM-95 w/Out Intens) Additional Enrollment92

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Assessed by time to treatment failure, occurrence of second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause. Statistical analysis will be to estimate the difference in the proportion of patients treated with each therapy who are long-term event-free survivors due either to the difference between the backbone therapy regimens (CCG BFM vs NHL/BFM-95), or due to the intensification. (NCT00004228)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of particpants (Number)
A0 (Localized Disease Stg I/II) Modified CCG BFM88
A1 (Disseminated, No CNS - CCG Mod BFM w/Out Intens82
A2 (Disseminated, No CNS - CCG Mod BFM w/ Intens80
B2 (CNS+) NHL/BFM-95 w/Intens Delayed Radiation Therapy63
B2 (Disseminated,CNS- (< Amend 7B)) NHL/BFM-95 w/Intens82
B1 (Disseminated CNS-) NHL/BFM-95 w/Out Intens84
B1 (NHL/BFM-95 w/Out Intens) Additional Enrollment90

[back to top]

2 Year Event Free Survival

Percentage of patients who were event free at 2 years. The 2-year event free rate was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. An event is defined as death, progression or treatment failure. (NCT00039130)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab With High Intensity Chemotherapy78

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Response is assessed by investigator according to Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT00039130)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab With High Intensity Chemotherapy83

[back to top]

2 Year Overall Survival

Percentage of participants who were alive at 2 years. The 2 year survival, with 95% confidence interval, was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039130)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab With High Intensity Chemotherapy80

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

"Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured as the interval from achievement of complete remission (CR) until relapse or death, regardless of cause; patients alive and in CR were censored at last follow-up. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~A complete remission (CR) was defined as recovery of morphologically normal bone marrow and blood counts (i.e., neutrophils >= 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelets > 100 x 10^9/L) and no circulating leukemic blasts or evidence of extramedullary leukemia and persisting for at least one month." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort1.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) as the interval from the on-study date until death. OS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort3.6

[back to top]

5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) and were alive and relapse free at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from CR

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor46
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors47

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months

"BCR-ABL response is defined in two ways: complete molecular response (CMR) and major molecular response (MMR).~Complete Molecular Response is defined as a Bcr-Abl (a fusion of gene of Bcr and ABl genes) ratio ≤0.0032% on the International Scale Bcr = breakpoint cluster gene Abl = abelson proto-oncogene~MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally)." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Molecular ResponseMajor Molecular Response
Entire Cohort94

[back to top]

5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who were alive at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from registration

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor53
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors51

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate at 1 year. PFS measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease or death due to any cause. Progressive disease is a 50% increase in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) of target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed if a complete response (confirmed, or unconfirmed) was not previously achieved; appearance of a new lesion/site; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease; or death due to disease without prior documentation of progression. (NCT00041132)
Timeframe: assessed after cycle 4, after completion of treatment, then every 3 months until 1 year after registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hyper-CVAD + MTX/Ara-C + Rituximab90

[back to top]

Response

Complete (CR), complete unconfirmed (CRU) and partial responses (PR). CR is complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease with the exception of nodes; no new lesions; previously enlarged organs must have regressed in size; and if bone marrow positive at baseline, it must be negative. CRU is complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; regressed, non-palpable organs; and one or more exceptions not qualifying for CR (see protocol section 10). PR applies to patients with at least one measurable lesion who do not qualify for CR or CRU. PR is a 50% decrease in sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to six identified dominant lesions identified at baseline; no new lesions; no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes; and splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed in size by at least 50% in SPD. (NCT00041132)
Timeframe: assessed after cycle 4 and after completion of treatment (168 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hyper-CVAD + MTX/Ara-C + Rituximab42

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival rate at 1 year. Time to death is from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. (NCT00041132)
Timeframe: assessed after cycle 4, after completion of treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter until 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hyper-CVAD + MTX/Ara-C + Rituximab92

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study enrollment to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00052910)
Timeframe: From study enrollment until death from any cause; up to 3 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm I (5-FU/LV)3.6
Arm II (ECF)3.5

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Disease free survival is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to death or documented second primary tumor, or cancer recurrence.The distribution of disease free survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00052910)
Timeframe: From the date of study enrollment until death or documented second primary tumor, or cancer recurrence; up to 4 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm I (5-FU/LV)2.7
Arm II (ECF)2.3

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease

The presence or absence of tumor cells at the end of induction assessed by studying tissue and/or blood/marrow. Details of methods and criteria used can be found in Shiramizu at al. BJH 153:758-763, 2011 (full citation in the citation section). (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Not Provided

Interventionpercentage of samples analyzed (Number)
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)22
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)70

[back to top]

Response Rate

Response includes both complete and partial responses. Per protocol, complete Response is defined as the complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease by physical examination, by imaging studies, by bone marrow biopsy (where indicated), by CNS evaluation (where indicated) and by biopsy where there is a residual abnormality on an imaging study. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present. Partial response is defined as: at least a 50% reduction in the size of all measurable tumor areas. Each site is to be defined by the product of the maximum length, width and depth (3 dimensions). No lesion may progress. No new lesion may appear. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present.. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants analyzed (Number)
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)88
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)83

[back to top]

Toxic Death

Implementation of the toxic death rate stopping rule, a death must be possibly, probably or definitely attributable to Rituximab and/or chemotherapy to be considered a toxic death. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Toxic deathNo toxic death
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)045
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)238

[back to top]

Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis

The incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis. Grade 3 stomatitis: Confluent ulcerations or pseudomembranes; bleeding with minor trauma. Grade 4 stomatitis: Tissue necrosis; Significant spontaneous bleeding; life-threatening consequences (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitisNo incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)441
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)634

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival, for Only Complete Response Patients

Disease Free Survival (DFS) is defined as the time from a Complete Response (CR) until death or relapse. The date of last clinical assesment will be used as the censor date for patients with no death or relapse. The DFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with confidence intervals presented. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy58.6
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy19.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission

A complete remission (CR) requires the following: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) > 1500/μl, no circulating blasts, platelets > 100,000/μl; bone marrow cellularity > 20% with trilineage hematopoiesis, and < 5% marrow blast cells, none of which appear neoplastic. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent (e.g., lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin or gum infiltration, testicular masses, or CNS involvement). (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy92
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy145

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Alemtuzumab (Phase I)

The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest alemtuzumab dose at which less than 40% of patients develop the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), where DLT is defined as the inability to proceed (due to medical complications) with the protocol treatment within six weeks of receiving the last dose of alemtuzumab. Groups of six patients will be enrolled into each cohort at the time of re-registration prior to starting Course IV. After a cohort has accrued 6 patients and at least 3 have completed the 2-6 week post alemtuzumab observation period without DLT, the incoming patients will be assigned to the next cohort in the table while the DLT and other toxicities continue to be assessed for the newly closed cohort. If less than 3 out of 6 enrolled patients in a cohort have completed the 2-6 week post alemtuzumab observation period without DLT, additional patients may continue to enroll in that same cohort, i.e., accrual will not be suspended while waiting for patient follow-up data. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy30

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) During Treatment With Alemtuzumab (Phase II)

Minimal Residual Disease measures the presence of of circulating leukemia cells in the body. Patients that report a Complete Response (CR) during treatment are further tested to determine the presence of small amounts of circulating leukemia cells. Here we report the number of patients who were MRD negative. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy16

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defines as the time from registration to death due to any cause. It is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with confidence intervals presented. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy33.6
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy23.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Proceed to Course V Within 2-6 Weeks of the Last Dose of Alemtuzumab (Phase II)

The primary endpoint is the number of participants who are able to proceed to course V within two - six weeks of completion of course IV. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 8 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy30

[back to top]

Failure Pattern

Type of failures (local/regional recurrence vs. distant recurrence vs. concurrent recurrence vs. second primary cancer vs. deaths) in the analysis population (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Local/regional recurrence onlyDistant recurrence onlyBoth local/regional and distant recurrenceAny recurrenceSecond primary cancerDeath
Control (Arm III)510116221
Irinocetan (Arm I)315220319
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)511420521

[back to top]

Proportion of Sphincter Preservation

Proportion of sphincter preservation was defined as number of patients with sphincter preservation divided by total number of patients randomized to the arm (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed at primary surgery time

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.814
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.724
Control (Arm III)0.655

[back to top]

3-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. 3-year OS rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years, estimated at 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.965
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.843
Control (Arm III)0.870

[back to top]

3-year Disease Free Survival

Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second invasive primary cancer and death from any cause, whichever occurred first. 3-year DFS rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years, estimated at 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.670
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.717
Control (Arm III)0.704

[back to top]

Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Positive.

Bone marrow status is defined as: M1: < 5% lymphoblasts; M2: 5-25% lymphoblasts; M3: > 25% lymphoblasts. Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years26
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)12
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old43
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years14
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years16
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years95
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old17
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years98
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years39
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)3
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)3
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)3

[back to top]

Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Negative.

Bone marrow status is defined as: M1: < 5% lymphoblasts; M2: 5-25% lymphoblasts; M3: > 25% lymphoblasts. Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years182
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)72
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old198
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years188
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years195
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years471
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old190
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years479
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years208
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)25
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)3
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)18

[back to top]

Comparison of the Increase in Cure Rate of High Risk ALL Without Causing More Serious Side Effects Between Interventions

Event Free Probability. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years83.2
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)81.6
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old69.1
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years91.2
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years82.1
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years73.5
Predisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old80.8
Prenisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years75.8
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years77.0
Prenisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)61.8
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)44.4

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Overall Survival (OS)

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years79.2
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)69.9
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old65.6
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years86.2
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years93.8
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years63.1
Predisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old84.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years73.6
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years74.6

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Event Free Survival (EFS)

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years66.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)43.3
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old35.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years80
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years34.7
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years39
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old55
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years47.8
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years49.4

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Overall Survival (OS).

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as negative with < .01 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years95.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)92.9
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old87.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years98.1
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years93.3
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years90.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old94.5
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years90.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years91.6
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)78.3
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)25.0

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Event Free Survival (EFS).

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years86.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)93.6
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old80.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years93.1
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years86.5
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years83.4
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old84.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years83.9
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years85.3
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)74.4
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)25

[back to top]

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A87.9
Mutant KRAS Arm D82.7

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

"The primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint.~Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier." (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A74.6
Wild-type KRAS Arm D71.5

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

"A secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint.~Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier." (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A67.1
Mutant KRAS Arm D65.0

[back to top]

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A51.1
Wild-type KRAS Arm D73.3

[back to top]

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A55.6
Mutant KRAS Arm D72.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A87.3
Wild-type KRAS Arm D85.6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-1.5
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Two Years

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan0.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A positive number indicates improvement in QOL." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-12.5
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Two Years

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-6.8
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan5.9
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin20.3

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival Rate at 4 Years

Disease-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of local-regional failure, the appearance of distant metastases, the appearance of a second primary failure, or date of death from any cause/ Disease-free survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive without failure are censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan68
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin62

[back to top]

Distant Failure Rate at 4 Years

Time to distant failure is defined as time from randomization to date of the appearance of distant metastases, last known follow-up (censored), or death without distant failure (competing risk). Distant failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan24
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Post-operative Chemotherapy

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy, approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-1.6
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin14.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation, approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan4.8
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin8.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A positive number indicates improvement in QOL." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation, approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-10.3
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-12.2

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

"A pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no evidence of residual cancer histologically; disease progression or death before surgery was considered less than pCR (even without surgical specimen). All cases were reviewed by the study's surgical oncology co-chair for the determination of pCR.~Each arm was first analyzed alone. If the arm had 9 or more pCRs in 48 evaluable pts, then the null hypothesis (H0) of 10% pCR rate would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of 25%, providing 90% power with a two-sided 10% type I error rate. If both arms reject H0, then statistical selection theory would be used to choose the arm for further study in a phase III trial. If only one arm has acceptable pCR rate, then that arm would be pursued in a phase III trial." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: After protocol surgery, approximately 10-16 weeks from randomization based on surgery occurring 4-8 weeks after chemoradiation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan10.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin20.8

[back to top]

Second Primary Rate at 4 Years

Time to second primary is defined as time from randomization to date of the appearance of a second primary cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death without second primary (competing risk). Second primary rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan2
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Two Years

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan0.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin6.7

[back to top]

Local-regional Failure Rate at 4 Years

Local-regional failure is defined as any of the following: no clinical complete response (cCR) in the primary site and/or nodes at any time after treatment completion (persistence), recurrence and/or progression in the primary site and/or nodes after cCR, and nonprotocol surgery to the primary site after cCR. Time to local-regional failure is defined as time from randomization to date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without local-regional failure (competing risk). Local-regional failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan16
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin18

[back to top] [back to top]

Survival Rate at 4 Years

Survival time is defined as time from registration/randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan85
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin75

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Pain Events

All Grade 3-4 Pain events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)31

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Neurology Events

All Grade 3-4 Neurology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)45

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal Events

All Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory Events

All Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)128

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia Events

All Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)49

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Hepatic Events

All Grade 3-4 Hepatic events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage Events

All Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal Events

All Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)139

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Dermatology Events

All Grade 3-4 Dermatology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)3

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Constitutional Events

All Grade 3-4 Constitutional events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)22

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow Events

"All Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms.~Arm Name" (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)564

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing Events

All Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology

All Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1

[back to top]

2-yr Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from date of diagnosis to death or date of last follow-up. 2-year overall survival is the probability of patients remaining alive at 2-years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods which censors patients at date of last follow-up. Precision of this conditional probability estimate was measured in terms of standard error. Median OS, the original primary endpoint, was not estimable based on the Kaplan-Meier method because of insufficient follow-up. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Patients are followed for survival up to 5 yrs post-therapy completion or death; As of this analysis, median follow-up among survivors was 31 months with the longest follow-up being 40 months.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Modified IRS0.70

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular Events

All Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)6

[back to top]

Pre-Radiation Therapy Chemotherapeutic Response

"Response pre-RT/post-CT was defined as follows with overall response defined as achieving PR or CR.~Complete Response (CR): Complete resolution of all initially demonstrable tumor on MRI or CT evaluation w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; negative CSF cytology. Partial Response (PR): >/= 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the maximum perpendicular diameters of the tumor (sum LD) relative to baseline w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; CSF cytology unchanged from that at diagnosis or clearing after being initially positive Stable Disease (SD): <50% decrease in the sum LD w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; CSF cytology unchanged from that at diagnosis or clearing after being initially positive Progressive Disease (PD): >/= 25% increase in the sum LD relative to baseline, or the appearance of any new areas of disease or appearance of positive cytology after two consecutive negative samples." (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed at study entry and pre-RT/post-CT at week 7.

Interventionproportion of evaluable patients (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Modified IRS0.58

[back to top]

Grade 3/4 Events

All Grade 3-4 events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1021

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary Events

All Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)4

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Pulmonary Events

All Grade 3-4 Pulmonary events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)4

[back to top]

Surgical Exploration

Patients who completed chemotherapy & chemo-radiation had restaging imaging studies 4 weeks after completion of chemo-radiation. If there were no contraindications for surgical resection, surgical exploration was performed 6-8 weeks after completing chemo-radiation (NCT00089024)
Timeframe: After 6 weeks of chemotherapy and then after 4 weeks of chemo-radiation.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
unresectable diseaseintra-abdominal metastasisresection of the primary tumor
Treatment469

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity While Receiving the Study Treatment

Toxicity event collected during Induction chemotherapy (CT) - two 3-week cycles, Concurrent CT and Radiation Therapy (CRT) (approximately 5.5 weeks), post CRT (4 weeks after the end of CRT), 2-3 months post CRT (8-12 weeks after the end of CRT) (NCT00089024)
Timeframe: From time of first dose until 30 days following final treatment, approximately 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction CT, grade 3Induction CT, grade 4CRT, grade 3CRT, grade 4Within 1 mo. post CRT, grade 3Within 1 mo. post CRT, grade 42-3 mos. post CRT, grade 32-3 mos. post CRT, grade 4
Treatment4511012190

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Monitoring of efficacy results will be performed in comparison with historical results. (NCT00096135)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CNS Patients - Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)64.9
Testicular Relapse Patients (Combination Chemotherapy)70

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Where events are defined as recurrence, second primary cancer, or death from any cause (NCT00096278)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm 1: Oxaliplatin + Leucovorin + 5-Fluorouracil75.5
Arm 2: Oxaliplatin + Leucovorin + 5-Fluorouracil + Bevacizumab77.4

[back to top]

Survival

Percentage of patients who did not experience an event where events are defined as death from any cause. (NCT00096278)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (mFOLFOX6)77.6
Arm II (Bevacizumab, mFOLFOX6)78.7

[back to top]

4 Year Overall Survival Rate

Percentage of patients who were alive at 4 years. The 4-year survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00098774)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Combination Chemo & Immunotherapy65

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate After Remission Induction

Response is assessed by investigator according to Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT00098774)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Combination Chemo & Immunotherapy66

[back to top]

4 Year Progression Free Rate

"Percentage of patients who were progression free at 4 years. The 4-year progression free rate was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~Relapse was assessed by investigator according to Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression required a 25% increase of previous area of gadolinium enhancement, appearance of new areas of T1 gadolinium enhancement or new appearance of malignant cells in the spinal fluid or new tumor appearance in other sites of the body" (NCT00098774)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Combination Chemo & Immunotherapy48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental Status Evaluation at 4 Months

Neurologic functioning will be assessed using the Mini-Mental Status Evaluation (MMSE), a standardized, bedside tool for evaluation of higher mental function. This assessment is based on a 30-point scale (0-30) with higher scores associated with better performance. (NCT00098774)
Timeframe: Baseline & month 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Baseline Score4 month ScoreChange from Baseline
Intensive Combination Chemo & Immunotherapy27281

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as time from randomization (to Arm A or Arm B) or registration (to Arm C) to the earlier of disease progression or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months once the patient is 2-4 years post-registration.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)10
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)9
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)13

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as time from randomization (to Arm A or Arm B) or registration (to Arm C) to death. Patients alive at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months once the patient is 2-4 years post-registration.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)18
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)21
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)32

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate is defined as proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response was assessed using Solid Tumor Response Criteria (RECIST). CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months up to 4 years post-registration.

Interventionproportion (Number)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)0.33
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)0.38
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)0.49

[back to top]

Event-free Survival Rate

Proportion of patients who were event free at 4 months (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At 4 months after enrollment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.604
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.640

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics

Mean trough serum concentration measured before final dose of epratuzumab. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: Up to day 36

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Twice Weekly Dosing Schedule501

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01%

Proportion of patients (evaluable and had MRD measured at the end of Block 1) who had MRD < 0.01%. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At the end of Block 1 of re-induction therapy (day 36)

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.195
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.295

[back to top]

Remission Re-induction (CR2) Rate

The proportion of patients who achieved complete response at the end Block 1 of re-induction therapy. Complete Remission (CR) - Attainment of M1 bone marrow (<5% blasts) with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of peripheral counts (ANC >1000/uL and platelet count >100,000/uL). Partial Remission (PR) - Complete disappearance of circulating blasts and achievement of M2 marrow status (5% or < 25% blast cells and adequate cellularity). Partial Remission Cytolytic (PRCL) - Complete disappearance of circulating blasts and achievement of at least 50% reduction from baseline in bone marrow blast count. Minimal Response Cytolytic (MRCL) - 50% reduction in the peripheral blast count with no increase in peripheral white blood cell count. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At the end of Block 1 of re-induction therapy (day 36)

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.646
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.660

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Rate

(NCT00100841)
Timeframe: From randomization to the first documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)9.6

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Event (SAE) Rate

The primary objective is to evaluate safety in all treated patients specifically the rate of serious adverse events which were defined as grade 5 events, grade 4 hemorrhage or thrombosis or bowel perforation (NCT00100841)
Timeframe: The duration of the study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 5 DeathGrade 4 venous thrombosis
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)22

[back to top] [back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) for Low MRD (Negative) Subjects by Genetic Subset (TEL/Trisomy Positive vs Negative)

Event-free probability where EFS is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Group 1-SR-low ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy95.22
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy88.52

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-High Patients.

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Group 3-SR-high ALL, Combination Chemotherapy85.58

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival Probability According to MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)

Event-Free survival by Day 29 MRD status (negative vs positive), Event Free Probability (time from study entry to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: MRD at Day 29 of therapy

InterventionPercent Probability (Number)
Induction Therapy, MRD Negative91.39
Induction Therapy, MRD Positive79.86

[back to top]

Overall Survival Probability (OS) According to Induction Day 29 MRD Status

Overall survival by Day 29 MRD status (negative vs positive), Overall survival defined as time from study entry to death or date of last contact for patients who are alive. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: Overall Survival Probability of 6 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Induction Therapy, MRD Negative97.07
Induction Therapy, MRD Positive90.47

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients

EFS for SR-Average with standard and Intensified Consolidation. Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard and Intensified therapy
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm III-combination Chemotherapy88.34
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm IV-combination Chemotherapy90.51

[back to top] [back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients

EFS for SR-Average with standard and Intensified Consolidation. Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard and Intensified therapyStandard therapy
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy83.8287.41
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm II-combination Chemotherapy88.8988.29

[back to top]

Early Marrow Status (EMS) by MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)

Early Marrow Status defined as M1 versus M2/M3 marrow is correlated with MRD (Positive vs. Negative) (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: Early Marrow Status at Day 15, MRD Status at Day 29 of therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients for Induction, MRD Negative4378
All Patients for Induction, MRD Positive258

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Low Patients

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
SR-low ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy95.22
SR-low ALL, Arm II-combination Chemotherapy93.96

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event: Final Analysis

Overall survival was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Patients not reported as having died at the time of the clinical cut-off date (30 June 2012) were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the final data cut-off date of 30 June 2012 (5 years after the last patient randomized).

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOX4NA
FOLFOX4 + BvNA
XELOX+BvNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event

Overall survival was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Patients not reported as having died at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the clinical data cut-off date of 30 June 2010 (36 months after the last patient randomized).

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOX4NA
FOLFOX4 + BvNA
XELOX+BvNA

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Time to Event

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the time of a recurrence, a new occurrence of colorectal cancer or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Patients without an event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be disease-free. Recurrence and new occurrence of colorectal cancer were based on tumor assessments made by the investigator. Patients with no tumor assessments after baseline but still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at day 1. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the data cut-off date of 30 June 2010 (36 months after the last patient randomized).

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOX4NA
FOLFOX4 + BvNA
XELOX+BvNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events

An overall survival event was death due to any cause. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the clinical data cut-off date of 30 June 2010 (36 months after the last patient randomized).

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with eventsPatients without events
FOLFOX4115840
FOLFOX4 + Bv151809
XELOX+Bv145807

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events: Final Analysis

An overall survival event was death due to any cause. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the final data cut-off date of 30 June 2012 (5 years after the last patient randomized).

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with eventsPatients without events
FOLFOX4161794
FOLFOX4 + Bv202758
XELOX+Bv182770

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival in Stage III Cancer Patients - Number of Events

A disease-free survival (DFS) event was composed of a recurrence, a new occurrence of colorectal cancer or death due to any cause. Recurrence and new occurrence of colorectal cancer were based on tumor assessments made by the investigator. Triggering events for DFS are reported; a patient can have both recurrence and a new occurrence of colon cancer. (NCT00112918)
Timeframe: From first patient randomized until the data cut-off date of 30 June 2010 (36 months after the last patient randomized).

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with a DFS eventRecurrenceNew OccurrenceDeathPatients without events
FOLFOX4237219317718
FOLFOX4 + Bv280253821680
XELOX+Bv253223625699

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rates

Probability of being alive was calculated in a yearly increment. (NCT00143403)
Timeframe: Median follow-up time (42 months)

,
Interventionsurvival rate (Number)
12 months24 months36 months
5-FU/FA0.9610.8450.716
Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA0.9730.8810.727

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

time interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of local, regional or distant relapse, or death due to cancer. (NCT00143403)
Timeframe: last tumor assessment date or cut-off date, whichever is earlier.

Interventionmonths (Median)
5-FU/FA21.6
Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA24.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The disease control rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease as best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI84.3
FOLFIRI Alone85.5

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI57.3
FOLFIRI Alone39.7

[back to top]

Participants With No Residual Tumor After Metastatic Surgery

Participants with no residual tumor after on-study surgery for metastases (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI29
FOLFIRI Alone10

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI46.9
FOLFIRI Alone38.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (KRAS Wild-Type Population)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI23.5
FOLFIRI Alone20.0

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI31.3
FOLFIRI Alone36.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (OS)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI19.9
FOLFIRI Alone18.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI8.9
FOLFIRI Alone8.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (Chinese V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI9.9
FOLFIRI Alone8.4

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning

Mean social functioning scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
At baselineAt week 8At week 16At week 24At week 32At week 40
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI75.2174.1473.7276.3174.0476.58
FOLFIRI Alone77.2876.7176.6777.9875.6478.07

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

Mean global health status scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a better QoL. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
At baselineAt week 8At week 16At week 24At week 32At week 40
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI58.8859.0260.7761.8359.6863.43
FOLFIRI Alone60.3361.8363.2964.0665.0764.02

[back to top]

Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event

Please refer to Adverse Events section for further details (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI599
FOLFIRI Alone597

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI7.4
FOLFIRI Alone7.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI16.2
FOLFIRI Alone16.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Time from first assessment of Complete Response or Partial Response to disease progression or death (within 60 days of last tumor assessment).~Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Tumor assessments based on modified WHO criteria." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from first assessment of complete response or partial response to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI9.6
FOLFIRI Alone7.7

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival - Avastin Subgroup

Defined as the time from date of first dose to the first observation of disease progression, or death due to any cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the first date of progression or death from any cause (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG - Avastin Subgroup13.7
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup11.5

[back to top]

Tumor Response - Avastin Subgroup

Response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Complete Response=disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease=20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease=small changes that do not meet above criteria. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: baseline to measured progressive disease (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Overall Response Rate (CR+PR)Stable Disease (SD)Disease Control Rate (CR+PR+SD)Progressive DiseaseUnknown
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup18981710
A+FFG - Avastin Subgroup000111161

[back to top]

Tumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Complete Response=disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease=20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease=small changes that do not meet above criteria. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: baseline to measured progressive disease (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Overall Response Rate (CR+PR)Stable Disease (SD)Disease Control Rate (CR+PR+SD)Progressive DiseaseUnknown
A + FOLFOX 421517163372
A+FFG1342125143

[back to top]

Toxicity - Avastin Subgroup

Includes all Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities and all non-hematologic toxicities with either >=1 Grade 4 or >=2 Grade 3 adverse events (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: every cycle (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutropenia (Grade 3)Neutropenia (Grade 4)Thrombocytopenia (Grade 3)Thrombocytopenia (Grade 4)Leukopenia (Grade 3)Leukopenia (Grade 4)Anemia (Grade 3)Anemia (Grade 4)Febrile neutropenia (Grade 3)Febrile neutropenia (Grade 4)Diarrhea (Grade 3)Diarrhea (Grade 4)Small intestinal obstruction (Grade 3)Small intestinal obstruction (Grade 4)Fatigue (Grade 3)Fatigue (Grade 4)Cerebral infarction (Grade 3)Cerebral infarction (Grade 4)Hyperglycemia (Grade 3)Hyperglycemia (Grade 4)Dehydration (Grade 3)Dehydration (Grade 4)Deep vein thrombosis (Grade 3)Deep vein thrombosis (Grade 4)Myocardial infarction (Grade 3)Myocardial infarction (Grade 4)Subdural hematoma (Grade 3)Subdural hematoma (Grade 4)Perirectal abscess (Grade 3)Perirectal abscess (Grade 4)Hypoxia (Grade 3)Hypoxia (Grade 4)
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup51000000100110200000102002000000
A+FFG - Avastin Subgrouup35103100001010000000000000001000

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression, or death due to any cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the first date of progression or death from any cause (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG8.6
A + FOLFOX 49.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is the duration from enrollment to death. For patients who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the date of death from any cause (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG20.6
A + FOLFOX 419.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response - A+FOLFOX4 - Avastin Subgroup

The duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of progression or death as a result of any cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: date of first response until the first date of documented progression or death from any cause (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup5.2

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of progression or death as a result of any cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: date of first response until the first date of documented progression or death from any cause (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG12.7
A + FOLFOX 47.9

[back to top]

Survival at 12 Months and 24 Months - Avastin Subgroup

Percentage of participants who were alive at 12 months and 24 months. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the date of death from any cause (up to 24 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants alive (Number)
12-Month Survival24-Month Survival
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup83.366.7
A+FFG - Avastin Subgroup75.650.4

[back to top]

Time to Progressive Disease - Avastin Subgroup

Defined as the time from study enrollment to the first date of disease progression. Time to disease progression was censored at the date of death if death was due to other cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to disease under study, whichever comes first (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG - Avastin Subgroup13.7
A + FOLFOX 4 - Avastin Subgroup13.8

[back to top]

Time to Progressive Disease

Defined as the time from study enrollment to the first date of disease progression. Time to disease progression was censored at the date of death if death was due to other cause. (NCT00192075)
Timeframe: randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to disease under study, whichever comes first (every 7-8 weeks for 2 cycles, monthly for 3 months, every other month for 6 months, then every 3 months up to 4.4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+FFG8.6
A + FOLFOX 49.7

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"Complete response requires that all of the following be present for at least four weeks.~1. Peripheral Blood Counts: Neutrophil count >= 1.0 x 109/L, Platelet count >= 100 x 109/L, Reduced hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit has no bearing on remission status, Leukemic blasts must not be present in the peripheral blood.~2 .Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy: Cellularity of bone marrow biopsy must be > 20% with maturation of all cell lines, <= 5% blasts.~3. Extramedullary leukemia, such as CNS or soft tissue involvement, must not be present." (NCT00262925)
Timeframe: assessed before the first consolidation cycle and first cytoreduction cycle, before the first and after the last maintenance cycle; after discontinuing treatment, assessed every 3 months if < 2 years and every 6 months if 2-5 years from study entry

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)33

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from registration to death from any cause. Patients alive were censored at follow up. (NCT00262925)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry and every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)5.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival time will be defined as the time from registration to death. Time to event distributions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall Survival (OS) will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. (NCT00265850)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab29.0
Arm B: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Cetuximab30.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS will be measured from study entry until first documented progression or death from any cause. Time to event distributions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. (NCT00265850)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab10.6
Arm B: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Cetuximab10.5

[back to top]

Patterns of Failure

Failure included recurrence, second primary cancer and death without recurrence. (NCT00303628)
Timeframe: Follow-up assessments performed every 3 months for patients < 2 years from randomization, every 6 months for patients 2-5 years from randomization, and every 12 months for patients 5-10 years from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Local/regional recurrenceDistant recurrenceMutiple recurrenceUnknown siteDeath without recurrenceSecond invasive primary cancerDFS event
Arm I (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin)6245151252
Arm II (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Bevacizumab)520816441

[back to top]

Change in Rectal Function Between Baseline and 12 Months

Change in rectal function between baseline and 12 months was measuring the long-term rectal function among the patients. Rectal function was measured using the Bowel Function Questionnaire at baseline and 12 months after randomization. The total score of the questionnaire was calculated as the number of problems with bowel function (score range 0-11). Change in rectal function between baseline and 12 months= total score at 12 months - total score at baseline. A negative value indicated improved rectal function. This change in score was calculated for each individual patient who had the data. (NCT00303628)
Timeframe: assessed at baseline and 12 months after randomization

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin)-1.17
Arm II (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Bevacizumab)1.18

[back to top]

5-year Disease-free Survival Rate

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second invasive primary cancer or death, whichever occurred first. Patients who were still alive and had no DFS events were censored at the last disease assessment date known to be free of DFS events. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year DFS rate. (NCT00303628)
Timeframe: Follow-up assessments performed every 3 months for patients < 2 years from randomization, every 6 months for patients 2-5 years from randomization, and every 12 months for patients 5-10 years from randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin)0.712
Arm II (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Bevacizumab)0.765

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause. Patients who were still alive were censored at last date of known alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year OS rate. (NCT00303628)
Timeframe: Follow-up assessments performed every 3 months for patients < 2 years from randomization, every 6 months for patients 2-5 years from randomization, and every 12 months for patients 5-10 years from randomization

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin)0.883
Arm II (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Bevacizumab)0.837

[back to top] [back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Completed 12 Cycles of Treatment

In the study, treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for a total of 12 cycles on both arms. The total number of cycles of treatment patient received until going off treatment due to any reason was recorded. It was a measure of the tolerance of the therapy. (NCT00303628)
Timeframe: assessed at the end of treatment

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin)0.722
Arm II (Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Bevacizumab)0.615

[back to top]

Resection Rate for T4 Rectal Cancers

Resection rate is defined as number of patients with T4 rectal cancer who underwent curative surgical resection among all eligible and treated patients with T4 rectal cancers (NCT00321685)
Timeframe: Assessed at surgery time

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I75

[back to top]

Resection Rate for T3 Rectal Cancers

Resection rate is defined as number of patients with T3 rectal cancer who underwent curative surgical resection among all eligible and treated patients with T3 rectal cancers (NCT00321685)
Timeframe: Assessed at surgery time

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I92

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

Pathologic complete response to preoperative therapy was determined at the time of surgical resection. Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as no evidence of invasive cells on pathologic examination of the primary rectal cancer (or tissue from the area where the tumor had been if there is a complete clinical response). Pathologic complete response rate is calculated as number of patients achieving pathologic complete response divided by all eligible and treated patients (NCT00321685)
Timeframe: Assessed at surgery time

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I17

[back to top]

5-year Recurrence-free Survival Rate

Recurrence free survival is defined as time from surgery to disease recurrence or death without recurrence (whichever occurred first) among resected patients. 5-year recurrence-free survival rate is estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, with 90% confidence interval calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT00321685)
Timeframe: recurrence follow-up began after post-operative chemotherapy, assessed every 3 months for patients 3-5 years from registration, every 6 months for patients 5-10 years from registration and every 12 months for patients 10 years from registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I81

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival is defined as time from registration to death from any cause. 5-year overall survival rate is estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00321685)
Timeframe: survival follow-up began after post-operative chemotherapy, assessed every 3 months for patients 3-5 years from registration, every 6 months for patients 5-10 years from registration and every 12 months for patients 10 years from registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I80

[back to top] [back to top]

Complete Response Rate - Locally Reviewed

"Assessed by the ECOG-ACRIN data manager based upon local review of images and data sent by the local sites.~Treatment response was determined by calculating the sum of the maximal cross section in 2 separate axes using enhancing lesion(s) on CT or MRI imaging. The same imaging modality was to be used throughout assessment. Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all contrast enhancing tumor size on CT or MRI, patient was off all glucocorticoids, and resolution of all meningeal and vitreous involvement if present. Response must have lasted at least 4 weeks." (NCT00335140)
Timeframe: For the primary endpoint, complete response will be based on disease status at three weeks post the end of therapy (week 17).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Standard Chemotherapy64

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic Diabetes Insipidus

"The number of patients who had Diabetes Insipidus and on DDAVP will be reported for this analysis due to small numbers.." (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Beginning of off-treatment to up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))1
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)1

[back to top]

Rates of Nutritional Toxicities

Rates of nutritional toxicities reported as Adverse Events during therapy for each cycle will be summarized using standard descriptive methods (such as number of patients). The difference in number of patients with nutritional toxicities between the two treatment regimens will be compared using a Chi-square test. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Beginning of treatment to the end of consolidation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nutritional Disorders Induction Cycle INo Nutritional Disorders Induction Cycle INutritional Disorders Induction Cycle IINo Nutritional Disorders Induction Cycle IINutritional Disorders Induction Cycle IIINo Nutritional Disorders Induction Cycle IIINutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle INo Nutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle INutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle IINo Nutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle IINutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle IIINo Nutritional Disorders Consolidation Cycle III
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))1029132673212279301029
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)172113251226830533533

[back to top]

Rates of Gastrointestinal Toxicities

Rates of gastrointestinal toxicities reported as Adverse Events during therapy for each cycle will be summarized using standard descriptive methods (such as number of patients). The difference in number of patients with gastrointestinal toxicities between the two treatment regimens will be compared using a Chi-square test. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Beginning of treatment to the end of consolidation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GI Tox Induction Cycle INo GI Tox Induction Cycle IGI Tox Induction Cycle IINo GI Tox Induction Cycle IIGI Tox Induction Cycle IIINo GI Tox Induction Cycle IIIGI Tox Consolidation Cycle INo GI Tox Consolidation Cycle IGI Tox Consolidation Cycle IINo GI Tox Consolidation Phase IIGI Tox Consolidation Cycle IIINo GI Tox Consolidation Cycle III
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))8314354351128732534
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)1226102883014241028632

[back to top]

Median/Range of Patients for Total Quality of Life (QOL) Score, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and Processing Speed Index (PSI).

"Three tools are used to assess intelligence (IQ) depending on age. The range of IQ scores is 40-160 (mean=100, SD=15); range for the Processing Speed Index (PSI)=45-155. Higher scores represent better functioning. (1) Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-4th Edition (WPPSI-IV) is used for ages 2.5 to 6 years. Bug Search and Cancellation subtests are summed to calculate PSI. (2) Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-5th Edition (WISC-V) is used for ages 6 - 16 years. Symbol Search and Coding subtests are summed to calculate PSI. (3) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales-4th Edition (WAIS-IV) is used for ages 16 and older. Symbol Search and Coding subtests are summed to calculate PSI.~The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4 (PedsQL) measures health-related quality of life (QOL). Parents complete the measure for children ages 2-17, and patients > 18 complete a self-report version. Total scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing better QOL." (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: 60 months (+/- 3 months)

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Median)
Total Quality of Life ScoreIntelligence QuotientProcessing Speed Index
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))60.577.082.0
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)56.578.589.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as time from enrollment to the occurrence of first event (disease progression/relapse, secondary malignancy, death from any cause) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. The percentage of participants with EFS and 90% confidence interval were provided. The difference in incidence for the two treatment regimens were compared using a one-sided log-rank test with a significance level of 0.1. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with EFS (Number)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))43.6
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)54.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Acute Adverse Events

Event is defined as the first occurrence of any acute toxicity. Estimates will be obtained using life-table methods. Patients who have progression or recurrence of disease will be censored in this analysis. Difference in incidence for the two treatment regimens will be compared using log-rank test. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Beginning of treatment to the end of consolidation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))97.4
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)97.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Secondary Malignancies

The number of patients who had secondary malignancy will be reported for this analysis due to small numbers. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Off-treatment up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))1
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic Primary Hypothyroidism/Subclinical Compensatory HypothyroidismHypothyroidism/Subclinical Compensatory Hypothyroidism

"Thyroid function was assessed as per ACNS0334 Endocrine Guidelines. Normal and Abnormal are defined at each institution by the laboratory standards where the blood tests are run. Primary Hypothyroidism/Subclinical Compensatory Hypothyroidism is defined as patients with Free T4 level less than Institutional Normal or equal to Institutional Normal with TSH level greater than Institutional Normal." (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Off-treatment up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))3
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic Low Somatomedin C

Low Somatomedin C is defined as patients with somatomedin C value less than institutional normal. As numbers are too small, descriptive statistics such as number will be reported for this analysis. Growth hormone function was assessed as per ACNS0334 Endocrine Guidelines. Low Somatomedin C levels are defined at each institution by the laboratory standards where the blood tests are run. (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Off-treatment up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))2
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic Central Hypothyroidism

"Thyroid function was assessed as per ACNS0334 Endocrine Guidelines. Normal and Abnormal are defined at each institution by the laboratory standards where the blood tests are run. Central Hypothyroidism is defined as Free T4 level less than Institutional Normal with TSH less than or equal to Institutional Normal." (NCT00336024)
Timeframe: Off-treatment up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Patients Treated Without Methotrexate (MTX))1
Arm II (Patients Treated With MTX)1

[back to top]

Event Free Survival. EFS

Percentage of patients who were event free at 3 years among those on Standard VCR dosing who did not undergo Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (SCT). (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: 3 years after enrollment

Interventionpercentage of participants EFS at 3 yrs3 (Number)
Regimen A: Standard Vincristine Dosing66.0

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1

Percentage of patients who had minimal residual disease (MRD) < 0.01% among those with isolated BM or combined BM relapse >= 36 months and had successful MRD determinations at End Block 1 (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: End of Block 1 (35 days) of Induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Regimen A50.8
Regimen B41.5

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3

Percentage of patients who had minimal residual disease (MRD) < 0.01% among those with isolated BM or combined BM relapse >= 36 months and had successful MRD determinations at End Block 3. (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: End of Block 3 (105 days) of Induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Regimen A81.4
Regimen B88.9

[back to top]

Adjusted Event Free Survival

Adjusted percentage of patients who were event free at 3 years. For patients who received matched donor SCT, EFS was adjusted to start from the actual SCT date. For patients who did not undergo SCT, EFS was adjusted to start from median time to SCT based on patients who received matched related SCT (where patients who had events prior to SCT date were excluded from the calculation of median time to SCT). (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionadjusted percentage of participants (Number)
Received SCTDid not receive SCT
Regimen A: Standard Vincristine Dosing82.264.2

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

Percentage of patients who were event free at 3 years among those with isolated BM or combined BM relapse >= 36 months. (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MRD < 0.01% BL1MRD >= 0.01% BL1MRD < 0.01% BL3MRD >= 0.01% BL3
Regimen A88.560.083.861.5
Regimen B77.346.283.333.3

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effects

Percentage of patients who developed at least 1 episode of grade 2 to 4 neuropathy. (NCT00381680)
Timeframe: Up to 107 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CC or CT genotypeHigh-risk CEP72 genotype (TT at rs924607)
All Patients17.344.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Emesis and no Rescue Therapy Within 5 Days of Receiving FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in the First Cycle of Chemotherapy.

(NCT00381862)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Aprepitant and Palonosetron54

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year

(NCT00392834)
Timeframe: 1 year post treatment

InterventionCumulative proportion surviving at 1 yr (Number)
Regimen A (R-CODOX-M Chemotherapy)1.0
Regimen B (Rituximab and IVAC Chemotherapy)0.82

[back to top]

Rate of Resection of Liver Metastases

Number of patients undergoing liver resection, based on patients with liver disease at baseline (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Post-randomisation until end of study

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cediranib 20 mg21
Placebo17

[back to top]

Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size

Maximum percentage reduction or minimum percentage increase in tumour size where size is the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

InterventionPercentage [change in tumour size (mm) ] (Mean)
Cediranib 20 mg-42.49
Placebo-40.61

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Based on RECIST measurements taken throughout the study and best objective tumour response at the defined analysis cut-off point. Measured from the time the criteria for CR/PR are first met (whichever is recorded first) until the patient progresses or dies. (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Treatment period from initial response up until data cut-off date of 21/03/10

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib 20 mg8.5
Placebo6.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Objective tumour response(defined as a confirmed response of CR or PR).The definition for a confirmed response was met when an initial RECIST response of PR/CR was confirmed at the next scheduled visit as a PR/CR according to an evaluable assessment.Intervening assessments of non-evaluable or stable disease were allowable as long as the initial RECIST response was confirmed.RECIST criteria defined as follows: Target lesions Complete Response(CR)Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR).At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began).Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.Non-target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all non-target lesi (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cediranib 20 mg254
Placebo178

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of months from randomisation to the date of death from any cause (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib 20 mg19.7
Placebo18.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

RECIST criteria defined as follows: Target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began).Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Non-target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all non-target lesions Non-Complete Response (non-CR/Non- Progression [non-PD]) Persistence of one or more non-target lesion or/and maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits. Progression (PD) Unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: RECIST assessed at baseline every 6 weeks through to week 24 and 12 week thereafter through to progression or data cut off date of 21/03/10 whichever was earliest.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib 20 mg8.6
Placebo8.2

[back to top]

Time to Wound Healing Complications

Number of days from post-randomisation surgery until wound healing complications (NCT00399035)
Timeframe: Post-randomisation until end of study

InterventionDays (Median)
Cediranib 20 mg18
Placebo18

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC).89
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG).90

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival by Bone Marrow Day 18 Status

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
M1 Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.89
M2/M3 Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.78
Hypocellular Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.88

[back to top]

Induction Serum Asparaginase Activity Level

Serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained days 4, 11, 18 and 25 post one-dose of IV-PEG on day 7 of the induction phase.

InterventionIU/mL (Median)
Day 4 NSAA LevelDay 11 NSAA LevelDay 18 NSAA LevelDay 25 NSAA Level
Overall.694.505.211.048

[back to top]

Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. Induction therapeutic NSAA rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving a NSAA level above 0.1 IU/mL at a given timepoint. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained days 4, 11, 18 and 25 post one-dose of IV-PEG on day 7 of the induction phase.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 4 NSAA RateDay 11 NSAA RateDay 18 NSAA RateDay 25 NSAA Rate
Overall97968712

[back to top]

Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Level

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for nadir serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained before doses administered at weeks 5, 11, 17, 23 and 29 of post-induction asparaginase treatment.

,
InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Week 5 NSAA LevelWeek 11 NSAA LevelWeek 17 NSAA LevelWeek 23 NSAA LevelWeek 29 NSAA Level
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC)0.1290.1430.1590.1800.123
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG)0.7260.7730.7870.7570.806

[back to top]

5-year Disease-Free Survival by CNS Directed Treatment Group

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
CNS-1.89
CNS-2.89
CNS-31.00
Traumatic Tap With Blasts.84
Traumatic Tap Without Blasts.87

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival by MRD Day 32 Status

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Low Day 32 MRD Level.79
High Day 32 MRD Level.90

[back to top] [back to top]

Induction Infection Toxicity Rate

Infection toxicity rate is defined as the percentage of patients who experience bacterial or fungal infection of grade 3 or higher with treatment attribution of possibly, probably or definite based on CTCAEv3 during remission induction phase of combination chemotherapy. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Assessed daily during remission induction days 4-32.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall26

[back to top]

Post-Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. Post-Induction therapeutic NSAA rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving a NSAA level above 0.1 IU/mL ever during post-induction therapy. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for nadir serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained before doses administered at weeks 5, 11, 17, 23 and 29 of post-induction asparaginase treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC)71
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG)99

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard RiskHigh Risk
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)87.485.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group

Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse adjusting for DFS events, was calculated using the method Gray et. al. High risk patients receive cranial radiation and low risk patients receive no cranial radiation. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Low RiskIntermediate RiskHigh Risk
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)1.851.163.64
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)1.929.16.52

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)89.01
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)90.53
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)78.07
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)86.46

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
High RiskInduction Failure
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)85.0100

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm II vs. Arm III + Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I and ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)91.45
ARM III and ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)85.78

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)

Disease-free survival defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, remission death) or date of last contact for those who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)91.76
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)90.53
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)86.06
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)84.89

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm III vs. Arm II + Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I and ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)82.96
ARM II and ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)88.30

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group

Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse adjusting for DFS events, was calculated using the method Gray et. al. High risk patients receive cranial radiation and low risk patients receive no cranial radiation. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Intermediate RiskHigh Risk
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)1.080
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)0.853.45

[back to top]

Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants

Evaluation the safety and toxicities of protocol regimen as evidenced by the rate of serious adverse events in study participants. (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab50

[back to top]

Overall Survival up to 2 Years

Percentage of patients with overall survival times of up to 2 years (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab61

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival in Months

Median number of months subjects achieved progression-free survival (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab13

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)

Percentage of patients achieving complete response or partial response per RECIST criteria ver 1.0 (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab67

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Response

Objective disease response: participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib124
FOLFIRI + Placebo128

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from the first objective documentation of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib30.1
FOLFIRI + Placebo39.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS data were censored on the day following the date of the last contact at which the patient was known to be alive. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib87.9
FOLFIRI + Placebo85.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of objective tumour progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: First dose of study treatment up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib33.6
FOLFIRI + Placebo36.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) EQ-5D Self-Report Questionnaire

"EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problem); 3 indicates worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain. Score is transformed and results in total score range -1.11 to 1.000; higher score indicates better health state." (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo0.040.040.030.050.050.09
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib0.020.020.020.030.000.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (EQ-VAS)

EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo3.34.36.64.34.09.0
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib1.01.71.83.8-0.9-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MDASI-GI Symptom Interference Score

Symptom Interference score is comprised of the sum 6 function items from MDASI core (general activity, walking, work, mood, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). Participant asked to rate how much symptoms have interfered in past 24 hours; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0=did not interfere and 10=interfered completely; lower scores indicated better outcome (range: 0 to 60). (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo-1.3-1.7-1.2-0.2-1.7-1.0
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib0.0-0.10.2-0.52.13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Assessment Inventory of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (MDASI-GI) Symptom Intensity Score

Symptom Intensity score is comprised of the sum of 13 MDASI core items (ie, pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, numbness or tingling). Participant asked to rate severity of each symptom at their worst in past 24 hours; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0=symptom not present and 10=as bad as you can imagine; lower scores indicated better outcome (range: 0 to 130). (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until end of treatment (EOT)/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo0.40.91.82.71.2-2.7
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib1.70.81.00.70.85.0

[back to top]

Complete Pathologic Response

This will be assessed on the basis of the surgical pathology report. (NCT00462501)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseUnknown
Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab With or Without Radiation8211

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in Objective Response (Partial or Complete Responses)

Objective response defined as complete or partial responses according to RECIST v1.0. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.).Radiologic assessment was carried out every four cycles (8 weeks) with centralized external secondary review. (NCT00467142)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Folfiri and Bevacizumab47.5

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the delay between response (complete or partial) and disease progression according to RECIST V1.0. Therefore, this criterion can only be assessed in in subjects who have responded. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or appearance of one or several new lesions (RECIST V1.0) Radiologic assessment was carried out every four cycles (8 weeks) with centralized external secondary review. (NCT00467142)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Folfiri and Bevacizumab9.5

[back to top]

Objective Tumour Response Rate

Number of patients with complete (CR) /partial response (PR) (based on RECIST). CR is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00494221)
Timeframe: RECIST at Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18, 24 and then every 12 weeks until progression through to a cut-off date of 13th Oct 2009 (based on approx 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cediranib 20 mg31
Cediranib 30 mg39
Placebo31

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of months until death (censored if still alive at date cut-off). Median non-estimable if >50% of subjects within a group are censored. (NCT00494221)
Timeframe: Randomisation until cut-off date 13OCT2009 (based on approximately 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib 20 mgNA
Cediranib 30 mg20.07
Placebo19.51

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Number of months from randomisation until progressive disease based on RECIST (progression of target lesions, clear progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions) or death in the absence of progression. (NCT00494221)
Timeframe: RECIST at Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18, 24 and then every 12 weeks until progression through to a cut-off date of 13th Oct 2009 (based on approx 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib 20 mg10.23
Cediranib 30 mg8.85
Placebo8.32

[back to top]

Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size

Best percentage change in tumour size from baseline, based on the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions (NCT00494221)
Timeframe: Randomisation until cut-off date 13OCT2009 (based on approximately 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Cediranib 20 mg-36.56
Cediranib 30 mg-43.99
Placebo-40.22

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Number of months from Complete/Partial response until progression up to cut-off date 13OCT2009 (based on approximately 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups). (NCT00494221)
Timeframe: RECIST at Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18, 24 and then every 12 weeks until progression through to a cut-off date of 13th Oct 2009 (based on approx 105 progression events observed across the 3 groups)

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Cediranib 20 mg13.26
Cediranib 30 mg8.12
Placebo10.42

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is measured from date of registration to first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00499369)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab3.2
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Lower Bevacizumab4.2
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Higher Bevacizumab8.5
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab1.4
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab5.6

[back to top]

Toxicity

Number of patients with Grade 3 through 5 adverse events that are related to study drug. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT00499369)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Alkaline phosphataseAnorexiaBilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Colitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)ConfusionConstipationCoughDehydrationDiarrheaDyspnea (shortness of breath)Edema: limbEdema: trunk/genitalEncephalopathyFatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Febrile neutropeniaHemoglobinHemorrhage, GI - StomaHypertensionInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - Abdomen NOSInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - BloodInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - UTIInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - Ab NOSInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - BloodInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - MucosaInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTILeukocytes (total WBC)LymphopeniaMagnesium, serum-low (hypomagnesemia)Mental statusMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavityMucositis/stomatitis (functional/symp) - Oral cavMucositis/stomatitis (functional/symp) - PharynxNasal cavity/paranasal sinus reactionsNauseaNeuropathy: sensoryNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Pain - Pain NOSPhosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)PlateletsPneumonitis/pulmonary infiltratesPotassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)Rash/desquamationRash: acne/acneiformRash: hand-foot skin reactionSodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)Thrombosis/thrombus/embolismVomiting
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab100101002300010210011101005001000000400110030000
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Higher Bevacizumab010010002301103100000000002110110030700000141001
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Lower Bevacizumab001000000210001210000010114000100010700202120000
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab001100111500002011100000010000001100310000000101
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab010000000300000010000000002000000001301001020010

[back to top]

Number of Patients With an Objective Disease Progression Event

Number of patients with objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of objective progression) (NCT00500292)
Timeframe: RECIST tumour assessments carried out at screening and then as per site clinical practice until objective progression. The only additional mandatory tumour assessment visit is at the point of data cut-off (5 March 2008 +/-3 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vandetanib 100 mg Plus FOLFOX23
Vandetanib 300 mg Plus FOLFOX27
Placebo Plus FOLFOX24

[back to top]

"Number of Patients With Each Response in Good Risk Genotype (Thymidylate Synthase Promoter Enhancer Region [TSER]*2/*2 or TSER*2/*3 Genotype [Low TS Expression])"

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) > 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) > 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions. This is a one-time assessment. (NCT00514020)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks to progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
Oxaliplatin + Leucovorin + 5-Fluorouracil09114

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the ERCC1 c.354C>T (rs11615) gene had a partial tumor response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
C/CC/TT/T
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU243

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the ERCC2 c.2251A>C (rs13181) gene had a partial response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AA/CC/C
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU531

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the GSTP1 c.313A>G (rs1695) gene had a partial response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AA/GG/G
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU432

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the MDR1 c.3435C>T (rs1045642) gene had a partial response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
C/CC/TT/T
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU090

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the TYMS 3'-UTR 1494delTTAAAG(6 bp) (rs34489327) gene had a partial tumor response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
+6 bp/+6 bp+6 bp/-6 bp
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU54

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the TYMS 5'-UTR TSER + G>C (rs34743033) gene had a partial tumor response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TYMS, TSER*2/*2TYMS, TSER*2/*3 (G)TYMS, TSER*2/*3 (C)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU522

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the TYMS 5'-UTR TSER + G>C (rs34743033) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TYMS, TSER*2/*2TYMS, TSER*2/*3 (G)TYMS, TSER*2/*3 (C)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU146

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the ERCC1 c.354C>T (rs11615) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
C/CC/TT/T
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU182

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the ERCC2 c.2251A>C (rs13181) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AA/CC/C
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU362

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the GSTP1 c.313A>G (rs1695) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AA/GG/G
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU821

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the MDR1 c.3435C>T (rs1045642) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
C/CC/TT/T
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU164

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the TYMS 3'-UTR 1494delTTAAAG(6 bp) (rs34489327) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
+6 bp/+6 bp+6 bp/-6 bp
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU65

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Stable Disease)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the XRCC1 c.1196G>A (rs25487) gene had stable disease. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AG/AG/G
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU650

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progressive disease - at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU6.2

[back to top]

Genetic Polymorphisms That May Alter Treatment Outcomes (Partial Response)

This outcome looks at what genotypes of the XRCC1 c.1196G>A (rs25487) gene had a partial response. (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A/AG/AG/G
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU162

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

"DCR - complete response, partial response, and stable disease~Complete response - disappearance of all target and non-target lesions~Partial response - at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter~Stable disease - neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response not sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease" (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU95.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR = complete response + partial response~Complete response - disappearance of all target and non-target lesions~Partial response - at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter" (NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU39.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00515216)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU11.4

[back to top]

Complete Pathologic Response Rate

"The complete pathologic response (path CR) rate after treatment calculated as the percentage of participants with path CR out of the total participants, where the path CR is defined as absence of tumor cells in the surgical specimen and all registered participants are used in the denominator for calculating the path CR rate.~Primary gastric carcinoma is not measurable by conventional criteria thus usual response criteria cannot be applied. The following criteria for response assessment applied: Pathologic Complete Response: Absence of tumor cells in the surgical specimen, 95% or more necrosis of the cancer; Complete Clinical Response: Absence of tumor on endoscopy, biopsy, cytology, or both." (NCT00525785)
Timeframe: Restaging and surgical resection at 4-6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, approximately at 16 weeks into treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5-Fluorouracil + Folinic Acid + Oxaliplatin14

[back to top]

Overall Response

Complete response (CR): Complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. No new lesions. Partial response (PR): Greater than or equal 50% decrease under baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. No new lesions. All measurable and evaluable lesions and sites must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00544414)
Timeframe: 30 days after last course of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment28

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression defined as a 50% increase or an increase of 10 cm^2 (whichever is smaller) in the sum of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, or clear worsening of any evaluable disease, or reappearance of any lesion that had disappeared, or appearance of any new lesion/site, or failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition. Progression-free survival defined as from first day of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first. If failure has not occurred, failure time is censored at the time of last follow-up. (NCT00544414)
Timeframe: From date of initial treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 171 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment170.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A

EFS time is defined as time from treatment assignment to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)86.67

[back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2)

EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)35.82

[back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. EFS will be compared between patients on treatment Arm C at DL2 to those on Arm B. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)38.89
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)35.82

[back to top]

Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have primary resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction

InterventionProportion of cells that are viable (Median)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)0.75
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)0.48
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)0.47

[back to top]

Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have acquired resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)

InterventionProportion of cells that are viable (Mean)
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)0.69

[back to top]

Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via mean and standard deviation by group. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction

InterventionqPCR fold expression ratio (Mean)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)1.25
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)7.85
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)5.83

[back to top]

Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in available Arm C relapse samples (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)

InterventionqPCR fold expression ratio (Mean)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)5.73

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy

Summarized with mean and standard deviation for those with available data in Arm C (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled between weeks 6-12 from start of induction

InterventionActivity percentage (Mean)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)69.00

[back to top]

Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm

Three-year EFS estimates and 90% CI will be reported by treatment arm and end-induction MRD status. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: 3 Years from end of Induction)

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm A (MRD Negative)86.05
Arm A (MRD Positive)87.5
Arm B (MRD Negative)47.37
Arm B (MRD Positive)22.73
Arm C (MRD Negative)51.85
Arm C (MRD Positive)27.03

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on the Tumor Assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) Criteria

"The overall ORR was the percentage of evaluable participants who achieved complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] according to RECIST criteria version 1.0.~CR reflected the disappearance of all tumor lesions (with no new tumors)~PR reflected a pre-defined reduction in tumor burden~Tumors were assessed by the IRC using Computerized Tomography (CT) scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans; and an observed response was confirmed by repeated imaging after 4 - 6 weeks." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 06 May 2010 (approximately 30 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/FOLFIRI11.1
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI19.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

"All AEs regardless of seriousness or relationship to study treatment, spanning from the first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment, were recorded, and followed until resolution or stabilization.~The number of participants with all treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), TEAE leading to death, and TEAE leading to permanent treatment discontinuation are reported." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization up to 30 days after the treatment discontinuation or until TEAE was resolved or stabilized

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Serious TEAETEAE leading to DeathTEAE causing permanent treatment discontinuation
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI60629437164
Placebo/FOLFIRI5921982973

[back to top]

Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay

Serum samples for immunogenicity assessment were analyzed using a bridging immunoassay to detect ADA. Positive samples in the ADA assay were further analyzed in the NAb assay using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay. (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: Baseline, every other treatment cycle, 30 days and 90 days after the last infusion of aflibercept/placebo

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one positive sample in the ADA assayAt least one positive sample in the NAb assay
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI81
Placebo/FOLFIRI182

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

"PFS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of progression, or death from any cause if it occurs before tumor progression is documented. To evaluate disease progression, copies of all tumor imaging sets were systematically collected and assessed by the IRC.~PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Hazard Ratio was estimated using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model.~The analysis for PFS was performed as planned when 561 deaths (OS events) had occurred." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the occurrence of 561 OS events, 06 May 2010 (approximately 30 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo/FOLFIRI4.67
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI6.90

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall Survival was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Once disease progression was documented, participants were followed every 2 months for survival status, until death or until the study cutoff date, whichever came first. The final data cutoff date for the analysis of OS was the date when 863 deaths had occurred (07 February 2011).~OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Hazard Ratio was estimated using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 07 February 2011 (approximately three years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo/FOLFIRI12.06
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI13.50

[back to top]

Determine the Incidence of Complete and Partial Response and the Duration of Response in Patients With Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) Treated With Sequential Administration of Oral 6-TG After MTX.

(NCT00588536)
Timeframe: Conclusion of the study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
MTX, 6-TG and Leucovorin212

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate of Previously-untreated Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinomas of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract When Treated With the Combination of 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Erlotinib.

"Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computerized tomography (CT) scan.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions" (NCT00591123)
Timeframe: 3.5 years

Interventionpercent of subjects that had response (Number)
FOLFOX Plus 5-FU and Erlotinib51.5

[back to top]

Toxicity of the Combination of FOLFOX, 5-FU, and Erlotinib

Adverse event assessment by investigators and as reported by subjects from time of consent to 30 days after last dose. Up to 3.5 years. (NCT00591123)
Timeframe: 3.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diarrhea / dehydrationAnorexiaNausea/VomitingRashFatiguePeripheral neuropathyNeutropeniaNeutropenic FeverHypokalemiaAST / ALT Elevation
FOLFOX Plus 5-FU and Erlotinib9543435122

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until death or up to 1 year after the randomization of last participant

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI12.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI15.7
Axitinib + FOLFOX17.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX14.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 130 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI7.52
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI12.29
Axitinib + FOLFOX10.15
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX10.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MDASI-D Symptom Interference Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal

Symptom Interference score is comprised of the average of 6 items on feeling or function from the MDASI-D core (general activity, mood, work, relations with others, walking, and enjoyment of life) and ranges from 0 to 10. Participants were asked to rate how much symptoms have interfered in last week; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0 = did not interfere and 10 = interfered completely. Lower scores indicated better outcome. Total average score range: 0 to 10. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of cycle 2-5, Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle throughout the study and end of treatment (cycle 65) or withdrawal

,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=39,46,35,33)Change at Cycle 2/Day 1 (n=35, 39, 34, 28)Change at Cycle 3/Day 1 (n=36,36,33,26)Change at Cycle 4/Day 1 (n=29,37,32,25)Change at Cycle 5/Day 1 (n=28,29,24,24)Change at Cycle 7/Day 1 (n=26,30,22,20)Change at Cycle 9/Day 1 (n=18,25,19,17)Change at Cycle 11/Day 1 (n=15,24,16,15)Change at Cycle 13/Day 1 (n=13,19,15,10)Change at Cycle 15/Day 1 (n=7,17,12,8)Change at Cycle 17/Day 1 (n=6,11,11,7)Change at Cycle 19/Day 1 (n=6,10,9,5)Change at Cycle 21/Day 1 (n=6,9,7,4)Change at Cycle 23/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,4)Change at Cycle 25/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,3)Change at Cycle 27/Day 1 (n=2,7,3,3)Change at Cycle 29/Day 1 (n=2,5,2,3)Change at Cycle 31/Day 1 (n=1,5,2,2)Change at Cycle 33/Day 1 (n=1,3,2,1)Change at Cycle 35/Day 1 (n=0,4,1,1 )Change at Cycle 37/Day 1 (n=0,4,0,1)Change at Cycle 39/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 41/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 43/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,1)Change at Cycle 45/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,1 )Change at Cycle 47/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 49/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 51/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 53/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 55/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 57/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 59/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 61/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 63/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0)Change at Cycle 65/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at end of treatment (n=21,29,26,21)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI2.10.81.30.81.00.71.11.01.12.32.42.11.72.21.61.63.24.54.5NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.3
Axitinib + FOLFOX2.40.10.30.20.80.40.60.81.3-0.10.70.30.40.9-0.6-1.6-1.3-0.1-0.8-1.2NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI1.70.90.3-0.20.40.40.30.30.70.90.70.81.0-0.30.50.90.0-0.5-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.3NA-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.30.0-0.20.0NA-0.21.0
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX2.8-0.5-0.20.50.30.00.3-0.20.71.32.12.42.11.41.41.31.31.20.33.31.32.01.51.82.5NANANANANANANANANANA1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MD Anderson Symptoms Inventory Diarrhea (MDASI-D) Symptom Severity Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal

Symptom severity score is comprised of average of 14 MDASI-D core items (pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, numbness or tingling and diarrhea) and ranges from 0 to 10. Participants were asked to rate severity of each symptom at their worst in last week; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0 = symptom not present and 10 = as bad as you can imagine. Lower scores indicated better outcome. Total average score range: 0 to 10. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of cycles 2- 5, Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle throughout the study and end of treatment (cycle 65) or withdrawal

,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=39,46,35,33)Change at Cycle 2/Day 1 (n=35, 39, 34,28)Change at Cycle 3/Day 1 (n=36,36,33,26)Change at Cycle 4/Day 1 (n=29,37,32,25)Change at Cycle 5/Day 1 (n=28,29,24,24)Change at Cycle 7/Day 1 (n=26,31,22,20)Change at Cycle 9/Day 1 (n=19,26,19,17)Change at Cycle 11/Day 1 (n=15,24,16,15)Change at Cycle 13/Day 1 (n=13,19,15,10)Change at Cycle 15/Day 1 (n=7,17,12,8)Change at Cycle 17/Day 1 (n=6,11,11,7)Change at Cycle 19/Day 1 (n=6,10,9,5)Change at Cycle 21/Day 1 (n=6,9,7,4)Change at Cycle 23/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,4)Change at Cycle 25/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,3)Change at Cycle 27/Day 1 (n=2,7,3,3)Change at Cycle 29/Day 1 (n=2,5,2,3)Change at Cycle 31/Day 1 (n=1,5,2,2)Change at Cycle 33/Day 1 (n=1,3,2,1)Change at Cycle 35/Day 1 (n=0,4,1,1)Change at Cycle 37/Day 1 (n=0,4,0,1)Change at Cycle 39/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 41/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 43/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,1)Change at Cycle 45/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,1 )Change at Cycle 47/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 49/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 51/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 53/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 55/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 57/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 59/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 61/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 63/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0)Change at Cycle 65/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at end of treatment (n=21,29,27,22)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI2.10.60.80.80.50.71.11.01.00.82.01.31.12.62.22.32.84.95.0NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA0.7
Axitinib + FOLFOX1.90.70.30.50.90.60.61.00.90.50.90.80.90.40.20.3-0.8-0.3-0.80.4NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.3
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI1.80.50.20.00.10.0-0.20.10.10.20.40.50.5-0.30.10.4-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.4NA-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.4-0.3-0.3-0.3-0.2NA-0.40.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX2.00.00.20.50.40.20.80.10.81.01.71.41.61.01.01.10.90.90.52.41.01.01.42.02.2NANANANANANANANANANA0.9

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Time in months from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 week up to 130 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI5.72
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI6.87
Axitinib + FOLFOX7.59
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX6.44

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR are those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 130 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI24.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI23.5
Axitinib + FOLFOX19.4
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX20.0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Leucovorin

Geometric mean (6S)-leucovorin area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from time 0 to the 3-hour time point. (NCT00634504)
Timeframe: 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours post-LV administration

Interventionmicromol x hour/L (Geometric Mean)
A (High-dose Methotrexate, Leucovorin, and Glucarpidase)6.43
B (High-dose Methotrexate and Leucovorin Without Glucarpidase)1.13

[back to top]

Toxic Death

The number of patients who experience death that is considered to be primarily attributable to complications of treatment. (NCT00653068)
Timeframe: During and after completion of study treatment up to 1 year after enrollment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum I3
Stratum III1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Estimated 4-year survival, where survival is calculated as the time from study enrollment to death from any cause or last follow-up alive whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier method is used for estimation. Patients alive at last contact are censored. (NCT00653068)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years after study enrollment

InterventionEstimated Probability (Number)
Stratum I0.3888
Stratum III0.5486

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Estimated 4-year EFS where EFS is calculated as the time from study enrollment to disease progression, disease relapse, occurrence of a second malignant neoplasm, death from any cause or last follow-up whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier method is used for estimation. Patients without an event are censored at last contact. (NCT00653068)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years after study enrollment

InterventionEstimated probability (Number)
Stratum I0.3401
Stratum III0.4500

[back to top]

Non-hematological Toxicity Associated With Chemotherapy: Grade 3 or Higher During Protocol Therapy

Number of Participants with Nonhematological Toxicity Associated With Chemotherapy: Grade 3 or Higher During Protocol Therapy. (NCT00653068)
Timeframe: During protocol therapy up to 1 year after enrollment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AcidosisAcute kidney injuryApneaAdult respiratory distress syndromeAspirationAtelectasisCatheter related infectionCentral nervous system necrosisDehydrationDiarrheaDissmeminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)EnterocolitisFebrile neutropeniaHearing impairmentHematuriaHydrocephalusHypernatremiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypotensionHypoxiaIncreased Alanine aminotransferaseIncreased Aspartate aminotransferaseIncreased LipaseIntracranial hemorrhagentraoperative venous injuryLaryngospasmLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionLung infectionMulti-organ failureMucositis oralPoisoning and procedural complicationsOther gastrointestinal disordersOther infectionPneumonitisProductive coughPulmonary edemaRecurrent laryngeal nerve palsyRenal calculiRespiratory failureSeizureSepsisSinus tachycardiaStridorUpper respiratory infectionVascular access complicationVoice alterationVomitingWeight loss
All Patients11213121111161111132922465412111313117211113262211111

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Irinotecan

Terminal phase half-life of irinotecan was calculated as ln 2/ kel. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI5.36

[back to top]

Clearance of Irinotecan

CL is calculated as dose divided by AUC 0-∞ (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL/hour (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI23.0

[back to top]

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Sunitinib

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL/hour (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI32.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Presented Objective Response: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of either a confirmed complete (CR) or partial response (PR) relative to the number of participants in FAS. Based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesion. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI36.6

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css) of 5-FU

Concentration at 22 hour post start of 5-FU infusion were to be used as Css if 5-FU concentrations suggested steady state at 22 hours time point. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI650

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Irinotecan

Vss was calculated using following equation: CL x mean residence time (MRT), where MRT = the area under the first moment curve from zero time to infinity (AUMC 0-∞)/AUC 0-∞- (infusion time/2), AUMC 0-∞ = the area under the first moment curve from zero time to time t (AUMC t)+ ((t x Ct*)/ kel) + (Ct* / kel^2), AUMC t is calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI160

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC 0-24) of Sunitinib

AUC 0-24 was determined using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib AUC 0-24SU012662 AUC 0-24Total (sunitinib + SU0122662) AUC 0-24
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI11613461507

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC Last) and Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ∞) of Irinotecan

"AUC last of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were calculated using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method.~AUC∞ of irinotecan was calculated using following equation; AUC last+(C*t/kel), where Ct* is the estimated concentration at the time of the last quantifiable concentration, kel is terminal phase rate constant that is estimated as the absolute value of the slope of a linear regression during the terminal phase of the natural-logarithm (ln) transformed concentration-time profile." (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Irinotecan AUC lastIrinotecan AUC ∞SN-38 AUC last
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI1310013800274

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Predose Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinib.

Plasma concentrations were assessed at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose and Cmax and Ctrough of sunitinib, its metabolite SU012662, and the total (sunitinib + SU0122662) were determined. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib CmaxSunitinib CtroughSU012662 CmaxSU012662 CtroughTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) CmaxTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) Ctrough
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI54.341.815.811.370.053.1

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan

Plasma samples were assessed at prior to initiation of irinotecan (and l-leucovorin) infusion, 1, 2 (predose for 5-FU bolus), 4, 8, and 24 hours after initiation of irinotecan infusion, and Cmax of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were determined. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Irinotecan CmaxSN-38 Cmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI196325.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.~PFS data was censored on the day following the date of the last tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for patients who 1) were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to observing objective tumor progression; 2) were removed from the study prior to documentation of objective tumor progression; and 3) were ongoing at the time of the analysis." (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI28.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR is defined as the time from the first objective documentation of complete or partial response that is subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The definition of censorship is the same as PFS. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI28.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events According to Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE).

Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient who received study drug was considered an adverse event (AE), without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE): those which occurred or worsened after baseline. An adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a serious adverse event (SAE): death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment emergent adverse eventsSerious adverse eventsCTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse eventsCTCAE grade 5 adverse events
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI7132701

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan

(NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Irinotecan tmaxSN-38 tmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI24

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sunitinib

(NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sunitinib TmaxSU012662 TmaxTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) Tmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI646

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy

Event-Free Survival (EFS) curves will be constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. A 1-sided 95% confidence interval for EFS will be constructed. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At 3 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)79.8
Standard-risk83.2
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy

Percent of patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Induction. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At the end of induction therapy (at 5 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)40.7
Standard-risk29.2
High-risk100.0

[back to top]

Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events

Number of patients in safety cohort with dose limiting toxicity (DLT)(including treatment delay) (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: Weeks 3 through 23 of treatment (From week 3 Induction through Intensification Block 1)

InterventionPts with DLTs (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)1

[back to top]

Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib)

An event is defined as: Induction failure, relapse at any site, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: From the time entry on study to first event or date of last follow-up, assessed up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)79.8
Standard-risk83.2
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation

A 1-sample Z-test of proportions (alpha=5%, 1-sided test) will be used. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At end of consolidation (at 11 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)10.5
Standard-risk0
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Limiting Toxicity

"The occurrence of Limiting Toxicity defined as Any CTC AE version 4 Grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicity thought to be possibly, probably or definitely related to zoledronic acid with the specific exclusion of:~Grade 3 nausea and vomiting controlled with adequate antiemetic prophylaxis.~Grade 3 transaminase (AST/ALT) that occurs during the evaluation period but resolves to ≤ Grade 2, before the planned dose of therapy after definitive surgery.~Grade 3 fever or infection.~Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia (see Section 5.1.1)~Grade 3 mucositis.~Grade 3 fatigue that returns to ≤ Grade 2, before the planned dose of therapy after definitive surgery.~Grade 3 joint range of motion, decreased or joint effusion that is related to the primary tumor." (NCT00742924)
Timeframe: Enrollment through the first 12 weeks of therapy.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1- Chemotherapy and 1.2 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid1
Arm 2 - Chemotherapy and 2.3 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid1
Arm 3 - Chemotherapy and 3.5 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid3
Chemotherapy and 2.3 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid After MTD2

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time

"Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of progression (as per RECIST v1.1) or death of any cause, whichever occurs first.~Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT00766142)
Timeframe: Since surgery, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy + Cetuximab12.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

OS is the delay between surgery and death (NCT00766142)
Timeframe: from surgery, up to five years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy + Cetuximab41.5

[back to top]

Mean Number of Adverse Events Per Patient, Within 30 Days of Surgery

(NCT00766142)
Timeframe: from the date of surgery up to 30 days

Interventionadverse events (Mean)
Chemotherapy + Cetuximab0.93

[back to top]

30-day Mortality Rate

Rate of deaths observed within 30 days of surgery (NCT00766142)
Timeframe: from the date of surgery up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemotherapy + Cetuximab0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, as described previously. The collective percentage of participants assessed as having a complete or major response was calculated as [number of participants with complete or major response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-657.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI52.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0

Using RECIST version 1.0, participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. The collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting RECIST criteria for CR or PR divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-661.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI80.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor

Following resective surgery, participants were evaluated for complete resection (R0) or the presence of microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor. The percentage of participants within each residual tumor classification was calculated as [number of participants with R0, R1, and/or R2 divided by the total number of participants] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R0, R1, or R2R0 or R1R0
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI61.051.248.8
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-648.733.323.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection

Among participants with curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]), relapse was defined as the first new occurrence of cancer or death. The percentage of participants who experienced relapse was calculated as [number of participants with a relapse event divided by the number of participants initially classified as R0 or R1 following resective surgery] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-676.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI57.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression

PD was defined, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-689.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI68.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. For participants without an event of death, OS was censored at the last-known alive date. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-632.2
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRINA

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-648.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI19.5

[back to top]

Time to Resection

Time to resection was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first resective surgery. For participants who did not undergo resective surgery, time to resection was censored at Day 1. Time to resection was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; and at time of surgery)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-64.4
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI4.3

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

RFS was defined as the time from curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]) to the date of first diagnosis of relapse. For participants with curative resection and without relapse, RFS was censored at the last known relapse-free assessment. RFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-68.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI17.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined, using RECIST version 1.0, as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD or death from any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For participants without documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the time of last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-611.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI18.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, where 'Complete response' was considered for those with 0 percent (%) viable tumor cells, 'Major response' for those with 1% to 49% viable tumor cells, 'Minor response' for 50% to 99% viable tumor cells, and 'No response' for 100% viable tumor cells. The response could not be determined in some cases and was documented as 'Unknown.' The percentage of participants within each response category was calculated as [number of participants with a given response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responseMajor responseMinor responseNo responseUnknown
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI4.847.633.3014.3
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6057.128.6014.3

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response according to RECIST version 1.0 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented CR or PR. Participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. For participants who did not complete a confirmatory tumor assessment, time to response was censored at the date of last tumor assessment, or if unavailable, at the date of first dose. Time to response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-63.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI3.1

[back to top]

Best Response (BR)

BR is recorded from start of treatment until progressive disease (PD). Imaging was repeated by same technique after every 4 cycles of treatment. Response was evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines version 1.0. Per RECIST v1.0 and CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage in sum of LD of target lesions to be PR nor increase of >=20%; PD, increase in existing lesions or new lesions. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: After every 4 cycles of treatment (approximately every 56 days for up to about 280 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Not evaluable (NE)
Stratum 106761
Stratum 2031564

[back to top]

Early Response Rate (RR) (Stratum 1 Only)

Early RR evaluated in stratum 1 to see if bevacizumab (bev) would be added to GFL treatment (tx). Patients with stable disease (SD) pre 5th cycle of tx had bev added. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Per RECIST and CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions; SD, neither sufficient shrinkage in sum of LD of target lesions to be PR nor increase of >=20%; Progressive Disease (PD), increase in existing lesions or new lesions. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of treatment (approximately 56 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Not evaluable (NE)
Stratum 105762

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Patients were censored if they did not progress, stopped particiaption due to an adverse event, or withdrew consent following the start of study treatment. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines version 1.0. Per RECIST v1.0, Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a measurable increase in smallest diameter of any target or non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, since baseline. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: From date of study treatment start until date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 15 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratum 15.5263
Stratum 23.9145

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: From the date of initial registration on the study until death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionProbability of surviving 12 months (Number)
Treatment0.88

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionProbability of 12-month RFS (Number)
Treatment0.83

[back to top]

Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate

Will be testing using an exact binomial test (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment57

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) or Death

The number of participants who experienced AEs, SAEs or death during the study and within 30 days of last dose. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: First dose to end of treatment and 30-day post treatment follow-up up to 31 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEsDeaths
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-644163

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1

(NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 predose, immediately after infusion, and 1, 2, 4, 24, 72, 96, 144, 168 and 236 hours postdose

Interventionmicrograms*hour/milliliter (µg*h/mL)] (Geometric Mean)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-639400

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1

CL is the volume of plasma (or blood) from which the drug is completely removed, or cleared, in a given time. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 predose, immediately after infusion, and 1, 2, 4, 24, 72, 96, 144, 168 and 236 hours postdose

Interventionmilliliters/hour (mL/h) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-620.3

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of response was defined as the time from first confirmed CR or PR to the first time of PD or death due to any cause. CR, PR and PD were defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD; PD was defined as a ≥20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. Participants with CR or PR who had no PD or death at the time of the data inclusion cutoff, the duration of response was censored at their last contact. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Time of response to time of measured PD or death up to 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-610.0

[back to top]

Half-Life (t1/2) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1

The t1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration of the drug to decrease by one half. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 predose, immediately after infusion, and 1, 2, 4, 24, 72, 96, 144, 168 and 236 hours postdose

Interventionhours (h) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-6142

[back to top]

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Mutation Status

Tumor tissues collected prior to study drug administration were evaluated for the presence or absence of KRAS mutations by a retrospective analysis. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
KRAS Mutation PositiveKRAS Mutation Negative
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-6916

[back to top]

Serum Anti-IMC-11F8 Antibody Assessment (Immunogenicity)

A participant was considered to have an anti-IMC-11F8 response if there were 2 consecutive positive samples or if the final sample tested is positive. Participants with a baseline sample positive for anti-IMC-11F8 antibodies were considered unevaluable for immunogenicity. A sample was considered positive for IMC-11F8 antibodies if it exhibited a post-baseline treatment emergent antibody level that exceeded the upper 95% confidence interval of the mean determined from the normal anti-IMC 11F8 level found in healthy treatment-naïve individuals. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Baseline up to last day of treatment plus 45 days after last treatment (127 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-64

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1

(NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 predose, immediately after infusion, and 1, 2, 4, 24, 72, 96, 144, 168 and 236 hours postdose

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (µg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-6344

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vss) of IMC-11F8 at Study Day 1 of Cycle 1

Vss is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug at steady-state. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 predose, immediately after infusion, and 1, 2, 4, 24, 72, 96, 144, 168 and 236 hours postdose

Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-63660

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the duration from the date of first dose to the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who were alive at the time of the data inclusion cutoff or lost to follow-up, OS was censored at the last contact. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: First dose to date of death from any cause up to 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-622.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response )

CR and PR defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.0 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and PR defined as a ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD. Percentage of participants was calculated as: (total number of participants with CR or PR from start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence) / (total number of participants treated) * 100. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-663.6

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) was determined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who had no PD or death at the time of the data inclusion cutoff, PFS was censored at their last tumor assessment prior to the earliest of the following events: 2 or more missed visits, additional cancer treatment or the end of the follow-up period. (NCT00835185)
Timeframe: First dose to measured PD or death up to 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-11F8 (Necitumumab) + mFOLFOX-610.0

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"Summary of overall objective response rate based on tumor assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed Complete Response (CR) or confirmed Partial Response (PR) relative to the total number of patients in the analysis population.~Per RECIST v 1.0 target lesions evaluation and assessed by tumor imaging: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.~The study was not powered for comparison of ORR between the two arms (non-comparative, open-label study)." (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 14 April 2011 (approximately 26 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
mFOLFOX6 Only45.9
mFOLFOX6 + Aflibercept49.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earliest between the last date the patient was known to be alive and the study cutoff date.~The study was not powered for comparison of OS between the two arms (non-comparative, open-label study)." (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 14 April 2011 (approximately 26 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
mFOLFOX6 Only22.31
mFOLFOX6 + Aflibercept19.45

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was based on tumor assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC). PFS was estimated from Kaplan-Meier Curves.~The study was not powered for comparison of PFS between the two arms (non-comparative, open-label study).~Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0), as at least a 20 percent increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions." (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 14 April 2011 (approximately 26 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
mFOLFOX6 Only8.77
mFOLFOX6 + Aflibercept8.48

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months

PFS rate at 12 months was defined as the percentage of patients alive without disease progression at 12 months after randomization. The primary efficacy analysis was based on assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC). The study was not powered for comparison of PFS rate at 12 months between the two arms (non-comparative, open-label study). Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0), as at least a 20 percent increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
mFOLFOX6 Only21.2
mFOLFOX6 + Aflibercept25.8

[back to top]

Immunogenicity of Intravenous (IV) Aflibercept

The antidrug antibody (ADA) assay was evaluated for participants receiving aflibercept. (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: Any time post baseline and 90 days after the last infusion of aflibercept, according to baseline status

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ADA Negative post-baselineADA Positive (drug specific) post-baselineADA Negative 90 days after last doseADA Positive 90 days after last dose
Negative or Missing1057450
Positive1211

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events in the safety population. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE), version 3.0 was used in this study to grade the severity of AEs. (NCT00851084)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization up to 30 days after the treatment discontinuation or until TEAE was resolved or stabilized

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Grade 3-4 TEAETreatment emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE leading to deathPremature treatment discontinuationPermanent treatment discontinuation
mFOLFOX6 + Aflibercept1191085583437
mFOLFOX6 Only11587322NA26

[back to top] [back to top]

Serum Anti-IMC-1121B (Immunogenicity) at Day 1

Data presented are the number of participants with treatment emergent anti-IMC-112B antibodies. (NCT00862784)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Cycles 1, 5, 9, and 30-day follow-up)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cycle 1 (n=39)Cycle 5 (n=33)Cycle 9 (n=25)30-day Follow-up (n=17)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + mFOLFOX-60202

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response or Partial Response [Objective Response Rate (ORR)]

ORR is the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), as classified by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0. CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR is a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions without new lesion and progression of non-target lesion. ORR is calculated as a total number of participants with CR or PR from the start of study treatment until disease progression or recurrence divided by the total number of participants treated, then multiplied by 100. (NCT00862784)
Timeframe: First dose to date of objective progressive disease up to 23.8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + mFOLFOX-658.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose to the first observation of progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0. PD is ≥20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesion and/or new lesion. For participants who had no PD or death or had started new therapeutic anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at their last radiographic tumor assessment. (NCT00862784)
Timeframe: First dose to measured progressive disease or death due to any cause up to 28.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + mFOLFOX-611.5

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of response was defined as the time from first objective status assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first time of progression or death as a result of any cause. CR or PR is classified by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0. CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR is a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions without new lesion and progression of non-target lesion. (NCT00862784)
Timeframe: Time of response to time of measured progressive disease up to 22.2 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + mFOLFOX-611.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who were alive or were lost to follow-up, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00862784)
Timeframe: First dose to death due to any cause up to 28.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + mFOLFOX-620.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Cycles of Radiotherapy

(NCT00865189)
Timeframe: Arm A: Week 16 to Week 23; Arm B: Week 1 to Week 7

Interventioncycles (Mean)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)4.5
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)5.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The overall survival was defined as the time from the first treatment intake to death from any cause. (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: From the first treatment administration to the date of death (up to approximately 6 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)NA
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT00865189)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)8.7
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)24.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Second Cancer, Local or Regional Recurrence, Distant Metastasis, or Death

(NCT00865189)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)30.4
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Surgery

The surgery involving a radical rectal excision using the TME technique. (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: Arm A: approximately 28-31 weeks after initiation of treatment; Arm B: approximately 13-15 weeks after initiation of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)91.3
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)97.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Sterilization Defined by ypT0-N0

Tumor sterilization was defined as the absence of residual tumor cells in the resected specimen including lymph nodes (ypT0-N0). The rate of sterilization of the tumoral specimen was assessed after surgery on the surgical specimen by local review. Analyses were performed for participants who have been operated as defined by the protocol (within the study and TME technique) and for all participants who have been operated. Reported is the percentage of participants with tumor sterilization. (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: After surgery (Arm A: approximately 28-31 weeks after initiation of treatment; Arm B: approximately 13-15 weeks after initiation of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)23.8
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)11.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Down-Staging (ypT0-pT2)

A participant with a downstaging was defined as a participant with T3 (T describes the size of the original [primary] tumor) at inclusion and T2 or T1 or T0 after surgery, or with N+ (N describes lymph nodes involvement) at inclusion and N- after surgery and if T is equal at inclusion and after surgery. The clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) classification was used at inclusion and the pathological staging tumor and nodes (ypTN) classification after surgery. Reported is the percentage of participants with tumor downstaging of the surgical specimen according to the local review and centralized review. (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: After surgery (Arm A: approximately 28-31 weeks after initiation of treatment; Arm B: approximately 13-15 weeks after initiation of treatment)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Downstaging, local review (n=41, 44)Downstaging, centralized review (n=39, 43)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)65.964.1
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)54.555.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local and Distant Recurrences

The percentage of participants with a recurrence was described by type of recurrence (local and distant recurrence). (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: After surgery (Arm A: approximately 28-31 weeks after initiation of treatment; Arm B: approximately 13-15 weeks after initiation of treatment)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local recurrenceDistant recurrence
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)2.217.4
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)6.713.3

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

The DFS was defined as the time from the first treatment intake to disease recurrence assessed (second primary cancer, local or distant recurrence, distant metastases) or death from any cause. The DFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00865189)
Timeframe: From first time of the treatment administration to the date of second cancer, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis or death from any cause (up to approximately 6 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)68.3
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)NA

[back to top]

Number of Cycles of Chemotherapy

(NCT00865189)
Timeframe: Arm A: Week 16 to Week 23; Arm B: Week 1 to Week 7

Interventioncycles (Mean)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)4.4
Arm B (Bevacizumab, Chemoradiotherapy)4.8

[back to top]

Number of Cycles of Induction Chemotherapy

(NCT00865189)
Timeframe: 6 cycles (12 weeks; cycle length = 14 days)

Interventioncycles (Mean)
Arm A (Bevacizumab, Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy)5.8

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression. Subjects without progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes. (NCT00865709)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 23 months later, assessed every 8 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + mFOLFOX69.2
Matching Placebo + mFOLFOX69.0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes. (NCT00865709)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 23 months later, assessed every 8 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + mFOLFOX69.1
Matching Placebo + mFOLFOX68.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00865709)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 33 months later.

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + mFOLFOX6535
Matching Placebo + mFOLFOX6552

[back to top]

Overall Response

Overall response of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes. (NCT00865709)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 23 months later, assessed every 8 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + mFOLFOX645
Matching Placebo + mFOLFOX661

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) was first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurred first according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Subjects still having CR or PR and alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR as a decrease of at least 30% and PD as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes. (NCT00865709)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 23 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Number)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + mFOLFOX67.5
Matching Placebo + mFOLFOX66.7

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.

The proportion of SAE rate among all eligible patients (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall8.2

[back to top]

Toxic Death Rate

The proportion of toxic death rate among all eligible patients. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall2.1

[back to top]

Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy

The percentage of eligible and evaluable patients who have achieved complete response at the end Block 1 of re-induction therapy. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: The outcome is measured the end of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs72.2
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 3. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 3 (Day 36 of Block 3) of re-induction therapy

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs80
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63.6

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 2. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 2 (Day 36 of Block 2) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs66.7
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs42.1

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 1. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs35.4
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs25

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

Percentage of patients who were event free at 4 months (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months after enrollment

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs68.5
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs37.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00942266)
Timeframe: Every 12 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat6.5
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat6.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (Stable Disease or Objective Response)

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI:~Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: At 2 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat53
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat53

[back to top]

Toxicity

"Number of participants with an adverse event.~Please refer to the adverse event reporting for more detail." (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: Daily

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat42
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat15

[back to top]

Vorinostat Pharmacokinetics

Blood samples (5 ml of blood each) will be collected in red-top vacutainers (no anticoagulant) at 0 (pre- vorinostat), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the vorinostat dose on the first day of 5-FU infusion on cycle 1 (day 2 of cycle 1). Mean area under the curve is presented with 95% CI. (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: day 2 (cycle 1)

Interventionhr∙μM (Mean)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat12.6
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat14.7

[back to top]

Response Rate

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI:~Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks; up to 100 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat2.3
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat100

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 100 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat2.4
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat2.9

[back to top]

Fluorouracil Steady-state Pharmacokinetics

Blood samples will be collected for determination of plasma 5-FU steady state concentration at 6 hours after start of 5-FU continuous infusion. The mean per treatment arm are presented. (NCT00942266)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Arm I: Low-dose Vorinostat389.4
Arm II: High-dose Vorinostat423.5

[back to top]

Part 2: Number of Participants With Each Type of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-Determined Overall Best Response

Overall best response was determined by RECIST criteria. Types of overall response could be: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Not Assessable (NA) or Incomplete Response/Stable Disease (IR/SD). (NCT00954512)
Timeframe: Up to ~30 days after the final dose of robatumumab (Up to ~14 months)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Assessable (NA)Incomplete Response/Stable Disease (IR/SD)
Regimen A: FOLFIRI (± Cetuximab) + Robatumumab000200
Regimen B: Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Robatumumab002100
Regimen D: Trastuzumab + Robatumumab001100
Regimen E: mTor Inhibitor (Everolimus) + Robatumumab002100
Regimen F: Gemcitabine (± Erlotinib) + Robatumumab001100

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to this study drug. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. (NCT00954512)
Timeframe: Up to ~30 days after the final dose of robatumumab (Up to ~14 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Regimen A: FOLFIRI (± Cetuximab) + Robatumumab2
Regimen B: Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Robatumumab3
Regimen D: Trastuzumab + Robatumumab2
Regimen E: mTor Inhibitor (Everolimus) + Robatumumab4
Regimen F: Gemcitabine (± Erlotinib) + Robatumumab4

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

"Number of Participants with Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progression of Disease (POD) Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (POD); POD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions" (NCT00957905)
Timeframe: Within 3 courses of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
Part A (Alvocidib and Oxaliplatin)025
Part B (Alvocidib and FOLFOX)6109

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival at 16 Weeks After Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first objective evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks postdose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRI66.7
CS7017 + FOLFIRI59.7

[back to top]

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in ≥10% of Participants Following Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

An adverse event (AE) >30 days after last dose of study drug was not included as a treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) unless considered related to treatment. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEBlood and Lymphatic System DisordersAnaemiaFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaEye DisordersGastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal painAbdominal pain upperAphthous stomatitisConstipationDiarrheaNauseaVomitingGeneral Disorders & Administration Site ConditionsAstheniaFace EdemaFatigueMucosal inflammationEdema peripheralPyrexiaInfections & InfestationsInfluenzaInjury, Poisoning, and Procedural ComplicationsInvestigationsWeight decreasedWeight increasedMetabolism and Nutrition DisordersDecreased appetiteDehydrationHypokalaemiaMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue DisordersPain in extremityBack painNervous System DisordersDizzinessHeadachePsychiatric DisordersRenal and Urinary DisordersReproductive System and Breast DisordersRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal DisordersCoughDyspneaSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue DisordersAlopeciaVascular Disorders
CS7017 + FOLFIRI5042357113398492012133039244314915734102116286202817461263143511931956201010
FOLFIRI50241600102147176593336333922091375215416120312374184617531065175721118

[back to top]

Best Overall Response and Objective Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

As per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.0, best overall response was characterized as confirmed complete response (CR) defined as disappearance of all target lesions, confirmed partial response (PR) defined as ≥30% decrease from baseline, stable disease (SD) defined as neither progressive disease (PD) nor PR, and PD defined as ≥20% increase from smallest sum of longest diameter recorded since treatment started. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as CR + PR. If there is no tumor assessment after the first dose of study drug, the best overall response is classified as Inevaluable. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Confirmed CRConfirmed PRObjective response (confirmed CR+PR)Stable diseaseProgressive diseaseInevaluableBest overall response of SD or better
CS7017 + FOLFIRI010101881230
FOLFIRI0772910238

[back to top]

Median Overall Progression-Free Survival Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first objective evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI4.2
CS7017 + FOLFIRI4.4

[back to top]

Median Overall Progression-Free Survival: Sensitivity Analysis Including Clinical Progression After Administration of CS-7017 and Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil After Failure of First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first objective documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death resulting from any cause, whichever came first. The sensitivity analysis included clinical progression as an event. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI4.2
CS7017 + FOLFIRI4.4

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression or death from any cause and is evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. (NCT00982592)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (FOLFOX Regimen and Placebo)8.77
Arm II (FOLFOX Regimen and Vismodegib)8.35

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Defined as the percentage of the patients who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. (NCT00982592)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (FOLFOX Regimen and Placebo)44
Arm II (FOLFOX Regimen and Vismodegib)37

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Defined as time from randomization day until death from any cause. (NCT00982592)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (FOLFOX Regimen and Placebo)15.38
Arm II (FOLFOX Regimen and Vismodegib)12.12

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicities (Grade 3 and Higher)

Defined as percentage of patients who experienced a toxicity with grade 3 or higher related to the protocol therapy. Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (NCT00982592)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Neuropathy (sensory)FatigueThrombosisNauseaHemorrhage_GIVomitingDehydrationNeutropeniaFebrile neutropeniaAnemiaThrombocytopeniaHypokalemiaHyperglycemiaHyponatremia
Arm I (FOLFOX Regimen and Placebo)1310118116632510051010
Arm II (FOLFOX Regimen and Vismodegib)19151488885021061042

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicities (grades1 and 2)

Defined as percentage of patients who experienced a toxicity with grade 1 or 2 (worst grade) related to the protocol therapy. Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. (NCT00982592)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Neuropathy (sensory)FatigueDiarrheaNauseaDysguesiaVomitingAnorexiaWeight lossLeukocytesAnemiaThrombocytopeniaHypoalbuminemiaHyperglycemiaElevated AST
Arm I (FOLFOX Regimen and Placebo)5654485416384130575157524129
Arm II (FOLFOX Regimen and Vismodegib)6273407142373529466056403746

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse Events were defined as TEAEs if they started on or after the date and time of administration of the first dose of study drug during the study. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any change in hematology, clinical chemistry, urine values and regular measurement of vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were recorded as TEAE. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI5

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Parameter

ECG was to be a complete standardized 12-lead recording. The ECGs were reviewed by the investigator or designee prior to study drug administration as part of the participant's standard of care. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI1

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examinations

Physical examination included examination of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, neck, heart, chest, lungs, abdomen, extremities, skin, lymph nodes, and neurological status. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI2

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as clinically significant adverse events (AEs) occurring less than or equal to (<=) 28 days after commencing study treatment and considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to study treatment. Toxicity was evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v.4.0). (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle length=28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI2

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS)

ECOG-PS measured participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (greater than[ >] 50 percent [%] of waking hours), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 1Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 2Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 3Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 4Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 5
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI12200

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. For participants not known to have died as of the cut-off date, OS was censored at the last known date alive. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death from Any Cause Up to 39.36 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI13.3
Placebo + FOLFIRI11.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)

The objective response rate is equal to the proportion of participants achieving a best overall response of partial response or complete response (PR + CR). Response was defined using RECIST, v. 1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions; PR was defined as having at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameter. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization until Disease Progression Up to 38.01 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI13.4
Placebo + FOLFIRI12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies

Blood samples were tested to determine if a participant reacted to ramucirumab by producing anti-ramucirumab antibodies. Samples were identified as treatment emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) if the post-treatment sample had an increase of at least 4 fold in titer from pre-treatment values. If the pre-treatment value was not detected or was not present, a 1:20 post-treatment titer was required to indicate treatment emergence. The percentage of participants with TE ADA was calculated as: (the number of participants with TE ADA / total number of participants with at least 1 post-treatment immunogenicity sample analyzed)*100. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 3, 5, and 30-Day FU

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Immunogenicity Any Time During Study (n=516, 512)Immunogenicity Post-Treatment (n=477, 473)
Placebo + FOLFIRI5.53.8
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI5.63.1

[back to top]

Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Ramucirumab

(NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Preinfusion and 1 hour postinfusion in Cycles 3, 5, 9, 13, and 17

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (ug/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cmin Dose 3 (n=248)Cmin Dose 5 (n=154)Cmin Dose 9 (n=27)Cmin Dose 13 (n=11)Cmin Dose 17 (n=5)Cmax Dose 3 (n=88)Cmax Dose 5 (n=51)Cmax Dose 9 (n=18)Cmax Dose 13 (n=12)Cmax Dose 17 (n=7)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI46.365.177.975.972.0221.0243.0262.0307.0253.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) [according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v). 1.1] or death due to any cause, whichever was first. PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the day of their death. Participants who did not progress or were lost to follow-up were censored at the day of their last radiographic tumor assessment. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization to Measured PD or Date of Death from Any Cause Up to 38.01 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI5.7
Placebo + FOLFIRI4.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D)

The EQ-5D is a generic, multidimensional, health status instrument. The profile allows participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood using a 3-level scale (no problem, some problems, and major problems). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted health-state Index Score according to the United Kingdom (UK) population-based algorithm. The possible values for the Index Score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). A negative change indicated a worsening of the participant's health status. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30-Day Follow-Up (FU) up to 171 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI-0.097
Placebo + FOLFIRI-0.103

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

The EORTC QLQ-C30 (v. 3.0) is a self-administered, cancer-specific questionnaire with multidimensional scales assessing 15 domains (5 functional domains, 9 symptoms, and global health status). A linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw scores to range between 0 and 100 per developer guidelines. For the functional domains and global health status scale, higher scores represent a better level of functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores represent a greater degree of symptoms. Maximum improvement is the best post-baseline change. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Baseline Up to 171 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI4.0
Placebo + FOLFIRI6.6

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for each randomization group will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-1.12
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.02

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for each randomization group will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-1.19
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks0.21

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.27

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.28

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.39

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.36

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.87

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.84

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 4.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.12

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 4.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.19

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the Social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.40

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.67

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.46
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.33

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.85
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.47

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.71
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.51

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.30

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.66

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.5 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.74

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.20

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.63

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.84

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.19

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.59

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.86

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.42

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Physical

Age and gender standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.44

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.21

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.27
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.34

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.64
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.67

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.72
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.77

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.16
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.25

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.62
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.64

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) for B-LLy Patients

OS is calculated as the time from study enrollment to death or date of last contact. The 5-year OS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-LLy93.97

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) for B-LLy Patients

EFS is calculated as the Time from study enrollment to first event (induction failure, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. The 5-year EFS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-LLy94.54

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Methotrexate Dose Randomization

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of interim maintenance II to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.7 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Average Risk: MTX 20 mg/m^2/Week Starting Dose95.05
B-ALL Average Risk: MTX 40 mg/m^2/Week Starting Dose94.17

[back to top]

DFS in Low Risk (LR) Patients Based on Randomization to 1 of 2 Low-intensity Regimens

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of Induction to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.1 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Low Risk Arm I (LR-M)98.75
B-ALL Low Risk Arm II (LR-C)98.50

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Genetic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.62

[back to top]

DFS in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Pulse Frequency Randomization

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of interim maintenance II to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.7 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks94.10
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks95.13

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.80
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.89

[back to top]

DFS for SR Down Syndrome Patients With Standardized Treatment and Enhanced Supportive Care

DFS is calculated as the time from end of Induction to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. The 5-year DFS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.1 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard Risk With Down Syndrome89.77

[back to top]

Sample Collection of Central Path Review Slides in B-LLy Patients

Percent of B-LLy patients who had adequate/usable samples of samples collected will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: Up to 1 month

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
B-LLy89.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Characterized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and a 5 mm absolute increase, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT01212822)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, FOLFOX)19.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Characterized using Kaplan-Meier curves. (NCT01212822)
Timeframe: 4.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, FOLFOX)26.0

[back to top]

Complete and Partial Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

To assess, by path examination after surgical resection, complete and partial response to neoadjuvant therapy. Characterized using proportions and 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01212822)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, FOLFOX)44.4

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

To investigate 2 year disease free survival in pts with resectable esophageal and GE junction cancer treated with perioperative bevaciumab and FOLFOX (NCT01212822)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, FOLFOX)4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Serum Concentration of Functional and Bound Sarilumab

(NCT01217814)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Bound ConcentrationFunctional Concentration
Sarilumab 150 mg qw4271.4342391.43

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death. For subjects who were still alive at the analysis data cut-off date or who lost to follow-up, survival was censored at the last recorded date that the subject was known to be alive. (NCT01228734)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 333 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab + FOLFOX-420.8
FOLFOX-416.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS was defined as the duration (in months) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 90 days of randomization or the last tumor assessment, whichever was later. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions, taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT01228734)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 333 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab + FOLFOX-49.2
FOLFOX-47.4

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as time from randomization to date of the first occurrence of radiologically confirmed PD as determined by IRC, Clinical PD according to the Investigator's assessment (if radiological confirmation of PD by IRC was unavailable), discontinuation of treatment due to progression or adverse event, start of new anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death within 90 days of last tumor assessment or randomization. Subjects without event were censored on the date of last tumor assessment. (NCT01228734)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 333 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab + FOLFOX-49.2
FOLFOX-45.6

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Curative Surgery of Liver Metastases

The number of subjects who underwent liver metastatic surgery after start of treatment and the outcome of surgery with respect to residual tumor after surgery (R0, R1, R2, not evaluable) were summarized. In case of resection of more than one metastasis, the worst outcome of surgery defined the overall status of a subject. R0 = No residual tumor after resection (all lesions resected completely); R1 = Metastases not resected completely with microscopic residual lesions; and R2 = Metastases not resected completely with macroscopic residual lesions. (NCT01228734)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 333 weeks

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Subjects with liver surgerySubjects with liver surgery outcome: R0Subjects with liver surgery outcome: R1Subjects with liver surgery outcome: R2Subjects not evaluable
Cetuximab + FOLFOX-497100
FOLFOX-462200

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Best ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 as determined by the IRC. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions. (NCT01228734)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 333 weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Cetuximab + FOLFOX-466.3
FOLFOX-440.5

[back to top]

The Response Rate of Patients Evaluated Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1

The number of patients with a Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions); Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT01229111)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate and Modified FOLFOX)461

[back to top]

Estimation of Overall Survival

Time of overall response (NCT01229111)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate and Modified FOLFOX)19.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Time in months that evaluable subjects survived progression free (NCT01229111)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate and Modified FOLFOX)14.4

[back to top]

Tabulation of the Toxicity Profile of the Combination Therapy

Number of patients that experienced >/= grade 3 treatment related toxicities (definite, probable, possible). (NCT01229111)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate and Modified FOLFOX)11

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. From the date treatment started until the date of death from any cause. (NCT01231399)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dose Level 1 - 2.5 mg Everolimus Daily20.3

[back to top]

Number of Subject With Overall Response

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT01231399)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose Level 1 - 2.5 mg Everolimus Daily5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. From the date treatment started until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01231399)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dose Level 1 - 2.5 mg Everolimus Daily14.5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Everolimus

The highest dose tested in which fewer than 33% of patients experience an attributable DLT to the study drug, when at least 6 patients are treated at that dose and are evaluable for toxicity. Toxicities will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. (NCT01231399)
Timeframe: Course 1 (first 28 days)

Interventionmg (Number)
Dose Level 1 - 2.5 mg Everolimus2.5

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)29.7

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival Defined From the Date of First Induction Complete Response (CR) to Relapse or Death Due to Any Cause

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: At 3 years after CR

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)52.6

[back to top]

Feasibility of Maintenance Therapy in This Patient Population (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR). Feasibility Will be Defined as the Number of Deaths Ocuring.

Proportions will be estimated based on the combined and individual cohorts. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)55.9

[back to top]

Probability of Being BCR-ABL Negative in the Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood at the Completion of the CNS Prophylaxis Course (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR)

Proportions will be estimated based on the combined and individual cohorts. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)0.667

[back to top]

Response

Proportion of patients reaching a CR. A CR requires the following: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) >1000/μL, no circulating blasts, platelets >100,000/μL; adequate bone marrow cellularity with trilineage hematopoiesis, and <5% marrow leukemia blast cells. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent (e.g., lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin or gum infiltration, testicular masses, or CNS involvement). (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant).9846

[back to top]

Response Duration

Duration of the partial or total response to the treatment. Evaluation and classification according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab8.66

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Measurements according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Main techniques: CT-scan. Two groups will be defined based on the score built from the proposed clinical variables and biomarkers. Instead of a binomial distribution, a Log-rank method has been used to calculate the sample size in order to include all the incidents during the follow-up. Expecting a minimum 20% difference (60 vs. 40%) on PFS at 12 months between groups and with the following assumptions:~Alpha error (bilateral): 5% Beta error: 20% Results are reported by subgroups to compare outcome measure according to BRAF mutation. All patients belong to same treatment/study arm." (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
WT BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab11.4
Mutant BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab5.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

"Measured as time in months from start of study treatment to death or lost to follow up.~Results are reported by subgroups to compare outcome measure according to BRAF mutation. All patients belong to same treatment/study arm." (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
WT BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab32.6
Mutant BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab9.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events

"Frequency and type of adverse events (AEs). AEs were coded according to NCI CTCAE V3.0 and classified by frequency, relatedness to study treatment (related/not related) and severity (Grade).~Severity ranges from grade 1 (low intensity) to Grade 5 (max. intensity, death)" (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEs72100462Grade 3 or higher AEs72100462Grade 5 AEs72100462Treatment related AEs of any grade72100462Treatment related AEs grade 3 or higher72100462
noyes
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab198
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab20
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab138
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab80
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab5
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab213
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab176
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab42
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab101
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab117

[back to top]

Secondary Biomarkers Analysis

The secondary biomarkers in serum and tumoral tissue will be analysed in order to predict the acquired resistance. (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PI3K and PTEN72100462IGF-1RP/MMP772100462
UKWTMutant
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab69
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab98
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab14
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab158
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab23
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death. (NCT01279681)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A [Fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab (BEV)]18.8
Arm B [Fluoropyrimidine/Oxaliplatin (OXAL) + BEV]15.4

[back to top]

Response Rate, Defined as the Percentage of Patients in Each Arm Who Have an Objective Status of Complete Response or Partial Response, Confirmed by a Second Assessment Measured at Least 6 Weeks From the Initial Assessment

"Response was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria:~Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions;~Partial Response (PR) 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions;~Progressive Disease (PD): 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions;~Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.~Response rate is reported as the percentage of participants who achieved Complete Response or Partial Response." (NCT01279681)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A [Fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab (BEV)]47
Arm B [Fluoropyrimidine/Oxaliplatin (OXAL) + BEV]38

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Patients were followed until progression (and progression was declared) regardless of whether the patient was on the first line treatment or not. Patients who progress following a missed scan will have their date of progression back-dated to the date of missing scan. Patients without a progression who are still alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of last follow-up. (NCT01279681)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A [Fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab (BEV)]6.7
Arm B [Fluoropyrimidine/Oxaliplatin (OXAL) + BEV]6.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Ramucirumab

Vss is the theoretical volume in which the total amount of study drug would need to be uniformly distributed during steady state to produce the same concentration as it is in plasma/serum. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

InterventionLiters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)2.513.06

[back to top]

Best Overall Response [Anti-Tumor Activity of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)]

Best overall response evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) criteria. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph nodes reduced to <10 millimeters (mm). Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph nodes), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter. Progressive Disease (PD): an increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition, the sum must have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (the appearance of 1 or more new lesions was considered progression). Stable Disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter since treatment started. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks until PD (up to 49 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)0141

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Ramucirumab

Reported for Day 1, Cycle 1 is AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC(0-inf)] and for Day 1, Cycle 5 is AUC over the dosing interval at steady state AUC(tau,ss). (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmicrograms*day/milliliter (mcg*day/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)16001690

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced Any Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT) During the DLT Assessment Period

DLTs were adverse events (AEs) possibly related to study drug that met the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE, version 4.03): Grade 4 neutropenia ≥7 days or ≥Grade 3 with bacteremia or sepsis; Absolute neutrophil count <1.0x10^9/Liters with fever ≥38.3°Celsius requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or ≥Grade 3 with bleeding requiring platelet transfusion; ≥Grade 3 altered coagulation tests and no anticoagulation; ≥Grade 4 or uncontrolled hypertension; ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except non-clinically significant Grade 3 events like electrolyte abnormality, hypersensitivity, and arthralgia/myalgia); urine protein >3 grams/24 hours; study drug-related toxicity causing Cycle 3, Day 1 treatment delay until Day 44 or later. Grade 3 or Grade 4 infusion-related reaction (hypersensitivity) due to ramucirumab or FOLFIRI, not a DLT. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 through Day 1, Cycle 3 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serum Anti-IMC-1121B Antibodies (Immunogenicity)

(NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 5 (Week 9), Cycle 6 (Week 11), Cycle 7 (Week 13), and Cycle 9 (Week 17) [(1 cycle=14 days)]

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=5)Day 1, Cycle 6 (n=1)Day 1, Cycle 7 (n=3)Day 1, Cycle 9 (n=4)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)0000

[back to top]

Half Life (t1/2) of Ramucirumab

t1/2 is the time required for the plasma/serum concentration to decrease 50%. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventiondays (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=6)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)7.388.55

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of Ramucirumab

The total body CL of ramucirumab on Day 1, Cycle 1 and on Day 1, Cycle 5, which was also considered CL at steady state (CLss), is reported. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmilliliters per hour (mL/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)11.410.4

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ramucirumab

The Cmax of ramucirumab in serum on Day 1, Cycle 1 and on Day 1, Cycle 5, which was also considered Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss), is reported. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=6)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)245267

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documented objective response of PR or CR, whichever was noted earlier, to first subsequent disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). DOR was defined for responders only (that is, subjects with CR or PR). DOR for subjects without disease progression or death before progression was right censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, assessed by every 8 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)257

[back to top]

Disease Control (DC)

DC was defined as the proportion of participants who had a best response rating of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST criteria that was achieved during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study treatment. CR and PR were confirmed not earlier than 4 weeks following the initial detection of response. A minimum of 8 weeks (allowing a minus 7-day time window) between start of study treatment and the first follow-up tumor assessment with SD as response was required to assign SD as best overall response. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, assessed by every 8 weeks

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)0.8537

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was calculated as the time from first date of receiving study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of follow-up. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, assessed by every 8 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)772

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as time from the date of start of study treatment to the date of first observed disease progression (radiological according to central assessment or clinical), or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. PFS for participants without disease progression or death at the date of database cutoff were right-censored at the last date of tumor assessment. Participants who had no tumor evaluation after baseline and no clinical progression post baseline and who did not die were censored at Day 1 in the analysis. PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions will also constitute PD. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, assessed by every 8 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)258

[back to top]

Objective Response (OR)

OR was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) observed by MRI or CT scan assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, version 1.1. CR and PR were confirmed not earlier than 4 weeks following the initial detection of response. CR = Disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and no-target). Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions and no appearance of new lesions. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after termination of study medication, an average of 47 weeks. Assessed every 8 weeks.

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)0.4390

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (DOSD)

DOSD was only evaluated in participants failing to achieve a best response of CR or PR, but who achieved SD. DOSR was defined as the time (in days) from date of start of study treatment to the date at which disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was first documented). The date the tumor scan was performed was used for this calculation. DOSD for participants without disease progression or death before progression at the time of analysis were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. (NCT01289821)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, assessed by every 8 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Regorafenib + Oxaliplatin/Folinic Acid/5-FU (mFOLFOX6)231

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To compare overall survival (OS) between ARM A and ARM B. OS is defined as the time from randomization until death as a result of any cause. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 5.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A13.8
Arm B11.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Severe Adverse Events

Toxicity Assessments were made according to NCI CTCAE v. 4.0 . Severe events (grades 3-4) that occurred in a higher percentage of regorafenib treated participants as compared to placebo are reported below. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
neutropeniadiarrheahypophosphatemiahypertensionelevated lipase
Arm A41151488
Arm B305023

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

To compare PFS between regorafenib + FOLFIRI chemotherapy (ARM A) versus placebo + FOLFIRI (ARM B) in patients failing one prior oxaliplatin-containing regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer. PFS is defined as the time from randomization until metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progression or death as a result of any cause. Radiographic response will be measured by RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, indicating if subject experienced a Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), no response or less response than Partial or Progressive; or Progressive Disease (PD), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 5.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A6.1
Arm B5.3

[back to top]

Drug Metabolism

To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of FOLFIRI between a subset of patients receiving regorafenib (ARM A) and patients receiving placebo (Arm B). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) levels of the irinotecan metabolite SN-38 were compared. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 28 days

,
InterventionAUC/dose=(ng/mL*h)/(mg/m^2) (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Arm A0.680.59
Arm B0.630.72

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Descriptively summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Response and disease progression were assessed using RECIST criteria version 1.1 (NCT01307956)
Timeframe: Patients were followed from time of consent until the date of first documented progession or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months.

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Panitumumab, Chemotherapy, Radiation)409

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Descriptively summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01307956)
Timeframe: From the first date of therapy until the date the patient dies, assessed up to 100 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Panitumumab, Chemotherapy, Radiation)596

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Can Undergo Resection

Restaging with repeat imaging studies will be performed. If no contraindication for surgical resection is identified, resection will be performed. Means (with associated standard errors), medians (with ranges), percentages and 95% confidence intervals will be reported as appropriate. (NCT01307956)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after completion of the radiation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Panitumumab, Chemotherapy, Radiation)11

[back to top]

Complete Pathological Response (pCR) Rate

Based on the proportion who achieve pCR based on the first 4 courses of protocol treatment. Evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines. Means (with associated standard errors), medians (with ranges), percentages and 95% confidence intervals will be reported as appropriate. (NCT01307956)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Panitumumab, Chemotherapy, Radiation)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Alive and Free of Progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients)

Clinical benefit rate is defined as the proportion of patients alive and free of progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients), assessed from first treatment with GI-4000. Progression is defined as CR (complete response) = disappearance of all target lesions; PR (partial response) = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions; PD (progressive disease) = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions; or SD (stable disease) = small changes that do not meet the above criteria. (NCT01322815)
Timeframe: 4 Months for patients who had undergone prior 1st-line therapy, and 10 months for previously untreated patients

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Chemotherapy and GI-40004
GI-4000 and Bevacizumab2

[back to top]

pCR Compared Between Induction Treatment Arms Among PET/CT Responders

"A PET/CT response to induction therapy is defined as metabolic activity of the tumor decreasing by >=35%, as>~>>~>>~>> measured by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). A pCR is defined as having no tumor found on pathology review at surgery in all resected lymph nodes and tissue. All tissues sampled must have NO viable tumor." (NCT01333033)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with a pCR (Number)
FOLFOX Responder40.28
CP (Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Radiation) Responder14.06

[back to top]

PET/CT Response Between Treatment Arms

A PET/CT response to induction therapy is defined as metabolic activity of the tumor decreasing by >=35%, as measured by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). (NCT01333033)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients with a response (Number)
FOLFOX Regimen64.86
CP (Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Radiation)56.14

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Among PET/CT Non-responders Within Each Induction Treatment Group

"A non-responder was defined as having a PET/CT SUV (standard uptake value) decrease of less than 35% after induction.~Among the patients who completed induction therapy and did not respond, the progression free survival in each arm were compared. PFS will be measured from study entry until documented progression or death from any cause. PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier." (NCT01333033)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOX Regimen Non-ResponderNA
CP Non-Responder33.4

[back to top]

Complete Pathological Response (pCR) of PET/CT Non-responders

The primary endpoint of this study is the percentage of PET/CT non-responders within each induction treatment group reporting a pCR. A pCR is defined as having no tumor found on pathology review at surgery in all resected lymph nodes and tissue. All tissues sampled must have NO viable tumor. (NCT01333033)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with a pCR (Number)
FOLFOX Non-Responder17.95
CP Non-Responder20

[back to top]

pCR Compared Among Non-responders Between Induction Treatment Arms if Treatment Regimens Are Found to be Efficacious

"A Complete Pathological Response (pCR) is defined as having no tumor found on pathology review at surgery in all resected lymph nodes and tissue. All tissues sampled must have NO viable tumor. A non-responder was defined as having a PET/CT SUV (standard uptake value) decrease of less than 35% after induction.>~>>>~>~>>> Among the patients who completed induction therapy and did not respond, the percentage of patients reporting a pCR in each arm were compared." (NCT01333033)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with a pCR (Number)
FOLFOX Regimen Non-Responders17.95
CP (Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Radiation) Non-Responders20

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Per-protocol Analysis Set (PPAS)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with shrinkage (PR) or disappearance of cancer (CR). Tumor response was evaluated according to the RECIST v1.1. The same method of tumor measurement and assessment had to be used to characterize each lesion throughout the study. Tumor assessment consisted of CT scan (abdomen + pelvis + chest) or CE-MRI (abdomen + pelvis) + non CE-CT (chest) according to the choice of the center. CR, Disappearance of all target lesions; PR, >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR. (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles of treatment (up to Week 22)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-664.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who were alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS was calculated as follows: OS (months) = ([Date of Death - first study drug administration] + 1)/30 (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: End of study up to approximately 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6NA

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study drug administration to the date of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined according to RECIST, v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants, who did not progress were censored at the date of the last assessment performed. Participants who withdrew from the study without documented progression and for whom an electronic case report form (eCRF) existed as evidence that evaluations had been made, were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments, but known to be alive were censored at the time of first study drug administration. PFS was calculated: PFS (months) = ([Date of Event - Date of first study drug administration] + 1)/30. (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: End of study up to approximately 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-611.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving No Residual Tumor (R0)/Surgical Margin With Microscopic Residual Tumor (R1) Liver Resection

The percentage of participants achieving R0/R1 liver resection was defined as the percentage of participants achieving R0 surgery (no residual tumor) plus percentage of participants achieving R1 surgery (surgical margin with microscopic residual tumor). (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: End of study up to approximately 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-629.9

[back to top]

Disease-free Interval (DFI)

DFI was defined as the time from the date of R0/R1 surgery to the date of disease relapse or death due to any cause. Participants who did not progress were considered censored at the date of the last assessment performed. For participants receiving two-stage resection, the date of R0/R1 surgery was the date of the second surgery. Participants, who did not receive surgery and participants without R0/R1 surgery were censored at Day 1. DFI was calculated as follows: DFI (months) = ([Date of R0/R1 surgery - Date of 1st relapse/Death] + 1)/30 (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: End of study up to approximately 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-610.8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with shrinkage (partial response [PR]) or disappearance of cancer (complete response [CR]). Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). The same method of tumor measurement and assessment had to be used to characterize each lesion throughout the study. Tumor assessment consisted of computerized tomography (CT) scan (abdomen + pelvis + chest) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) (abdomen + pelvis) + non CE-CT (chest) according to the choice of the center. CR, Disappearance of all target lesions; PR, >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01383707)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles of treatment (up to Week 22)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-654.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years

Disease progression is defined using the 2007 revised Cheson et al. criteria that is at least 50% increase in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target measurable nodal lesions over the smallest sum observed, or >= 50% increase in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) of any nodal > 1 cm in shortest axis, or >= 50% increase in the SPD of other target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed, any new bone marrow involvement, any new lesion, lymph node with long axis is > 1.5 cm or if both long and short axes are > 1 cm, PET positive if patients with no pretreatment PET scan or when PET scan was positive before therapy. Progression-free survival is measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)82
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)81

[back to top] [back to top]

Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)

Complete Response (CR) is a complete disappearance of all disease with the exception of the following. If no PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative. If the PET scan was negative before therapy, all nodal masses at baseline must have regressed. No new lesions. Previously enlarged organs must have regressed and not be palpable. Bone marrow (BM) must be negative if positive at baseline. Normalization of markers. Partial Response (PR) is a 50% decrease in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to 6 identified dominant lesions, including spleenic and hepatic nodules from baseline. No new lesions and no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes. If PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, PET should be positive in at least one previously involved site. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)94.1
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)82.9

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival (OS)

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)81
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)79

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Complete Tumor Regression Rate (TRG1)

"Complete tumor regression rate (TRG1) was the ratio of patients with TRG1, graded at surgical resection, and total patients included in the study, expressed in percentage.~Tumor regression grade (TRG) was misured according to the Mandard Scale. Briefly,TRG1 was a complete tumor regression (regardless of the presence of acellular mucine lakes), and TRG2 was a nearly complete tumor regression with extensive fibrosis; TRG3 presented with clear evidence of residual cancer cells but with predominant fibrosis;TRG4 was a residual of cancer cells outgrowing fibrosis; TRG5 was the absence of regressive changes." (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: In 8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Concomitant - Schedule A12.5
Sequential - Schedule B50

[back to top]

Patients With Metastatic Lymphnodes at Pathology Exam After Surgery

Number of patients with metastatic lymphnodes at pathology exam after surgery. (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: In 8 weeks after chemoradiation therapy completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sequential - Schedule B14
Concomitant - Schedule A5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was calculated from the date of initial treatment to the date of death for any cause or last follow up. (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sequential - Schedule B40
Concomitant - Schedule A11

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Sphincter Preservation

Sphincter preservation in patients with tumor < 5 cm from anal verge in 8 weeks after chemoradiation therapy (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: In 8 weeks after chemoradiation therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Concomitant - Schedule A13
Sequential - Schedule B41

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was calculated from the date of the initial treatment until tumor progression or relapse, death for any cause or last follow up.~Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sequential - Schedule B37
Concomitant - Schedule A11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Concomitant - Schedule A7
Sequential - Schedule B22

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

"Clinical response was assessed before surgery with the same imaging modalities that were used for the inclusion in the study.~Clinical response rate was the ratio between complete and partial response, evaluated by RECIST CRITERIA, and total of patients evaluated, expressed in percentage of patients.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01481545)
Timeframe: 7 weeks after chemoradiation therapy up to 11 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sequential - Schedule B40
Concomitant - Schedule A20

[back to top]

PFS Variation by ERCC1

"Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.~Participants were divided into subgroups according to ERCC1 quartiles to assess whether the differences in PFS between the two treatment arms varied by ERCC1 levels." (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: up to 3 years after registration

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Q1 ERCC1 (0.20-0.80)Q2 ERCC1 (0.81-1.10)Q3 ERCC1 (1.11-1.42)Q4 ERCC1 (1.43-5.71)
Arm I5.67.45.64.6
Arm II2.83.02.92.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in High-ERCC1 Patients

Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I FOLFOX4.7
Arm II IT5.3

[back to top]

PFS in Low-ERCC1 Participants

Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I5.9
Arm II2.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is the length of time between protocol registration and patient death (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I11.4
Arm II8.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR (complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response, unconfirmed partial response) in patients with measurable disease were assessed in each arm and compared between arms using Chi-squared test.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Arm I42
Arm II30

[back to top]

Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) After Baseline Visit.

Patient reported quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G). The FACT-G is a scale for assessing general QOL of cancer patients. It consists of four subscales: Physical Well Being, Functional Well Being, Social/Family Well-Being, and Emotional Well-Being. Each item in the FACT-G was scored using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1=a little bit; 2=somewhat; 3=quite a bit; 4=very much). For the negative statements, reversal was performed prior to score calculation. According to the FACIT measurement system, a subscale score was the summation of the individual item scores if more than 50% of subscale items were answered. When unanswered items existed, a subscale score was prorated by multiplying the mean of the answered item scores by the number of items in the subscale. The FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of the subscale scores. The FACT-G score ranges 0-108. A larger score suggests better QOL. (NCT01535053)
Timeframe: Prior to cycle 3 (4 weeks after cycle 1 if off study treatment prior to cycle 3). Prior to cycle 5, Prior to cycle 7, 26 weeks after starting study treatment.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pre-cycle 3Pre-cycle 5Pre-cycle 726 weeks
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)78.375.585.091.2
Regimen II (Methotrexate)81.678.984.590.9

[back to top]

Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) at Baseline

Patient reported quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G). The FACT-G is a scale for assessing general QOL of cancer patients. It consists of four subscales: Physical Well Being, Functional Well Being, Social/Family Well-Being, and Emotional Well-Being. Each item in the FACT-G was scored using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1=a little bit; 2=somewhat; 3=quite a bit; 4=very much). For the negative statements, reversal was performed prior to score calculation. According to the FACIT measurement system, a subscale score was the summation of the individual item scores if more than 50% of subscale items were answered. When unanswered items existed, a subscale score was prorated by multiplying the mean of the answered item scores by the number of items in the subscale. The FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of the subscale scores. The FACT-G score ranges 0-108. A larger score suggests better QOL. (NCT01535053)
Timeframe: Prior to cycle 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)82.3
Regimen II (Methotrexate)81.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response

Complete Response is defined as 3 consecutive bi-weekly values of hCG<5 over a minimum of 4 weeks of normal hCG values with no values greater than 5 mIU/ml (NCT01535053)
Timeframe: hCG testing is performed prior to each cycle to treatment until treatment is completed, up to 10 months. For patients who have responded to treatment hCG must be obtained every 4 weeks for 1 year after completing treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)78.6
Regimen II (Methotrexate)88.5

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Post Protocol Multi-agent Chemotherapy Treatment for Each Arm.

(NCT01535053)
Timeframe: Anytime during post treatment follow-up for up to 2 years from study entry.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)0
Regimen II (Methotrexate)0

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Post Protocol Surgical Treatment for Each Arm.

(NCT01535053)
Timeframe: Anytime during post treatment follow-up for up to 2 years from study entry.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)0
Regimen II (Methotrexate)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CTCAE v4 Graded Adverse Events With Low-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia by Arm

Maximum grade of physician assessed adverse events reported during treatment (NCT01535053)
Timeframe: Assessed throughout the treatment period and within 2-4 weeks after discontinuation of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Regimen I (Dactinomycin)714600
Regimen II (Methotrexate)4101000

[back to top]

GMDS (Griffiths Mental Development Scale)

GMDS for testing and estimate babies psychomotor development from birth to 2 years trough six subscales : Locomotor, Personal-social, Hearing and language, Eye-Hand coordination, Performance.Sub- and General Quotients (GDQ) standard score are based on a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 16. For children with delayed development, which is the case for children with Down Syndrome, Quotient tables could be not used because sub- and General quotient floors at 50. For each subscale, a raw score was derived from the contributing items. Total raw score was obtained by adding subscale raw scores. Sum of all subscale raw scores was converted into a development age using correspondence table. Subscale and global development quotients were computed by dividing the development age by the chronological age multiplied by 100. For preterm infants, chronological age was corrected taking into account the gestational term. Higher QD's scores show a better psychomotor development outcome (NCT01576705)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondeveloppement quotient (Mean)
Thyroxin + Folinic Acid51.96
Thyroxin+Folinic Acid Placebo51.27
Thyroxin Placebo+ Folinic Acid51.66
Thyroxin Placebo+ Folinic Acid Placebo51.67

[back to top]

BL (Brunet Lezine Revised Scale)

BL includes 4 subscales : Locomotor, Coordination, Language, Sociability. Subscale and global developpemental quotients were computed by dividing the developpemental age by the chronological age multiplied by 100. This kind of formula do not give a min-max outcome. Higher QD's scores show a better psychomotor developpement outcome. (NCT01576705)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondeveloppement quotient (Mean)
Thyroxin + Folinic Acid51.18
Thyroxin+Folinic Acid Placebo50.64
Thyroxin Placebo+ Folinic Acid51.24
Thyroxin Placebo+ Folinic Acid Placebo51.36

[back to top]

Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS defined as the time from study enrollment to progression in the liver by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or death, whichever occurs first will be analyzed and summarized with the survival probabilities over time using Kaplan-Meier method. Confidence intervals for the median PFS rates at different time points will be constructed when appropriate. (NCT01581307)
Timeframe: Up to 29 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
2nd Line Chemotherapy With Radiotherapy3

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

OS, defined as the time from study enrollment to death from any cause, will be analyzed and summarized with the survival probabilities over time using Kaplan-Meier method. Confidence intervals for the median OS rates at different time points will be constructed when appropriate. (NCT01581307)
Timeframe: Up to 29 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
2nd Line Chemotherapy With Radiotherapy14.09

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The overall response: ORR = complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). Rate will be summarized using both point estimates and exact confidence intervals based on the binomial distribution by groups. (NCT01581307)
Timeframe: Up to 29 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
2nd Line Chemotherapy With Radiotherapy05

[back to top]

Time to Progression in Phase II Dose Expansion

Defined as the time from first treatment until objective tumor progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01611857)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks until progressive disease, expected 18 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Tivantinib + FOLFOX Dose Expansion7.0

[back to top]

The Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Phase I Dose Escalation

Using a standard 3+3 design participants were enrolled in dose-escalating cohorts to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tivantinib when given with FOLFOX (5-FU 400 mg/m^2, continuous IV 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2 over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 IV, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2). MTD is defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 patients experiences a DLT, assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4. (NCT01611857)
Timeframe: 14 Days (1 cycle)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tivantinib 120 mg (PO BID) + FOLFOX0
Tivantinib 240 mg (PO BID) + FOLFOX0
Tivantinib 360 mg (PO BID) + FOLFOX1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival in Phase II Dose Expansion

Defined as the time from first treatment until objective tumor progression or death from any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01611857)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks until treatment discontinuation, projected 18 months and then every 3 months thereafter up to 5 years from start of treatment.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Tivantinib + FOLFOX Dose Expansion6.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Phase II Dose Expansion

Defined as the time from first treatment until death from any cause. (NCT01611857)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks until treatment discontinuation, an expected average of 18 months, then every 12 weeks thereafter up to 5 years from start of treatment.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Tivantinib + FOLFOX Dose Expansion9.6

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] in Cycle 1

Dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was calculated from AUC(0-∞) divided by the dose. Data presented are Geometric Least Squares (Geo LS) means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
FOLFIRI (Cycle 1)22.120.81

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)

(NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: -2, -1, -0.5, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 25, 48, 72, 96, 168, 264, 336 hours post-ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) infusion

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (µg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)201.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)

Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ramucirumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Up To 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 1

Dose-normalized Cmax was calculated from Cmax divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
FOLFIRI (Cycle 1)3.180.05

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Cmax of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2

Dose-normalized Cmax was calculated from Cmax divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)3.310.05

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized AUC(0-∞) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2

Dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was calculated from AUC(0-∞) divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)20.560.77

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Calculated using Kaplan Meier methods and the median will be estimated assuming an exponential distribution. (NCT01666730)
Timeframe: Time from first day of treatment to death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Metformin Hydrochloride, FOLFOX)7.1

[back to top]

Response Rate (RR) Objective Tumor Response Based on Computed Tomography (CT) Scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

"CBR is the number of participants of the total analysis population who experience confirmed complete (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST~CR = all detectable tumor has disappeared PR = a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum Stable Disease (SD) = small changes that do not meet previously given criteria. Progressive disease (PD) = a >=20% increase in target lesions~The true response rate of the combination therapy for this patient population will be estimated based on the number of response using a binomial distribution and its confidence intervals will be estimated using Wilson's method." (NCT01666730)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Metformin Hydrochloride, FOLFOX)4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria

Calculated using Kaplan Meier methods and the median will be estimated assuming an exponential distribution. (NCT01666730)
Timeframe: Time from first day of treatment received to the earlier documented disease progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Metformin Hydrochloride, FOLFOX)5.1

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Computed Tomography (CT) Scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans According to RECIST

"CBR is the number of participants of the total analysis population who experience a CR, PR, or SD per RECIST~CR = all detectable tumor has disappeared PR = a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum SD = small changes that do not meet previously given criteria. PD = a >=20% increase in target lesions" (NCT01666730)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Metformin Hydrochloride, FOLFOX)14

[back to top]

Number of Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities According to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0

The toxicity profile of the combination will be tabulated. (NCT01666730)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionEvents (Number)
Grade 3Grade 4
Treatment (Metformin Hydrochloride, FOLFOX)602

[back to top]

T(Last) of [6S]-5-THF

The time-point for the last measurable concentration for the metabolite [6S]-5-TH in plasma (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)4.75000000
L-LV(60)2.00000000
Mod(200)5.75000000
Mod(60)3.42857143

[back to top]

T(Last) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF

The time-point for the last measurable concentration for the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF in plasma (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)24.0000000
L-LV(60)12.0000000
Mod(200)15.0000000
Mod(60)8.5714286

[back to top]

T(Last) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF

The time-point for the last measurable concentration for the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF in plasma (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)6.00000000
L-LV(60)8.33333333
Mod(200)0.33333500
Mod(60)0.16667000

[back to top]

Cmax of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Plasma

Maximum concentration (Cmax) in plasma of the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)2786.25000
L-LV(60)1078.00000
Mod(200)2020.50000
Mod(60)800.42857

[back to top]

T(Last) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

The time-point for the last measurable concentration of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)3.00000000
L-LV(60)2.00000000
Mod(200)3.25000000
Mod(60)1.35714286

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Tumor Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF in tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m23574
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m21904
Modufolin 200 mg/m24396
Modufolin 60 mg/m21882

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-THF in mucosa adjacent to the tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m21333
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2626
Modufolin 200 mg/m25099
Modufolin 60 mg/m23481

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-THF in Tumor Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-THF in tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m21329
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2933
Modufolin 200 mg/m24175
Modufolin 60 mg/m22219

[back to top]

T(1/2) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Terminal plasma elimination half-life time for the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)3.07069184
L-LV(60)9.12204918
Mod(200)0.90893994
Mod(60)0.34368840

[back to top]

T(1/2) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF

Terminal plasma elimination half-life time for the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)1.51328500
L-LV(60)0.98944069
Mod(200)0.23180085
Mod(60)0

[back to top]

T(1/2) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF

Terminal plasma elimination half-life time for the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)7.0955575
L-LV(60)10.7281060
Mod(200)9.0743346
Mod(60)8.5121573

[back to top]

Tmax of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Timepoint (tmax) when Cmax in plasma occurs of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)1.14285857
L-LV(60)1.00000000
Mod(200)0.08333000
Mod(60)0.08333000

[back to top]

T(1/2) of [6S]-5-THF

Terminal plasma elimination half-life time for the metabolite [6S]-5-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)5.59459251
L-LV(60)0
Mod(200)1.24808943
Mod(60)0.96378070

[back to top]

S-Folate Concentration

Blood samples for folate biomarker (S-folate) analysis were collected at Screening, Day 2 and Day 5 (End of study visit). (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken at Screening visit, Day 2 and End of Study (Day 5)

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Concentration at ScreeningConcentration at Day 2Concentration at Day 5
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m221.7545.0044.75
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m221.0045.0040.80
Modufolin 200 mg/m215.0345.0044.14
Modufolin 60 mg/m218.7145.0040.29

[back to top]

Number of AEs Per Severity

Number of reported AEs per treatment with respect to severity (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Screening visit until end of study, Day 5

,,,
InterventionEvents (Number)
AEs of mild severityAEs of moderate severityAEs of severe severity
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m2130
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2001
Modufolin 200 mg/m2172
Modufolin mg/m2522

[back to top]

Homocystein Concentration

Blood samples for folate biomarker (homocystein) analysis were collected at Screening, Day 2, and Day 5 (End of study visit). (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken at Screening visit, Day 2, and End of Study (Day 5)

,,,
Interventionμmol/L (Mean)
Concentration at ScreeningConcentration at Day 2Concentration at Day 5
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m212.596.419.04
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m211.276.409.18
Modufolin 200 mg/m214.537.0610.20
Modufolin 60 mg/m213.808.1410.10

[back to top]

Gene Expression Ratios (Mucosa:Tumor)

Concentration of different genes involved in folate transport and metabolism were analysed in both tumor and adjacent mucosa. The concentration in mucosa was divided by the concentration in tumor. A value above 1 indicate that the gene expression was higher in mucosa than in tumor and a value below 1 that the gene expression was higher in tumor than in mucosa. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of Surgery)

,,,
InterventionRatio (Number)
AMTPCFTFPGSMTHFSABCC3GGHABCC1MTHFD1LSHMT1SHMT2RFC-1
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m23.332.450.830.724.150.310.430.352.260.481.18
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m21.862.920.630.832.480.350.770.290.720.380.53
Modufolin 200 mg/m25.602.750.700.873.370.470.550.241.130.340.66
Modufolin 60 mg/m21.352.030.470.511.830.500.410.150.890.310.48

[back to top]

Correlation of Gene Expression in Tumor and Adjacent Mucosa

Concentration of the gene expression was analysed in both tumor and adjacent mucosa. The presence of any correlation between the results (i.e., concentration of the gene expression in tumor versus adjacent mucosa) was evaluated for each treatment. No evaluation was done between treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of Surgery)

,,,
InterventionNormalized concentration (Number)
AMTPCFTFPGSMTHFSABCC3GGHABCC1MTHFD1LSHMT1SHMT2RFC-1
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m2-0.471930.114970.176640.958400.003220.789280.747570.744590.591830.555080.64565
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2-0.707300.89976-0.647430.584190.77700-0.097370.144360.209550.05531-0.71666-0.02450
Modufolin 200 mg/m20.754040.585020.886820.43194-0.258910.46883-0.167240.371600.678530.862660.23312
Modufolin 60 mg/m20.429720.881280.976240.94364-0.389870.937110.829630.321130.509660.810400.31800

[back to top]

AUC(0-2h) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 2 hours, for the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)326.40261
L-LV(60)239.90076
Mod(200)7734.09113
Mod(60)0

[back to top]

AUC(0-2h) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 2 hours, for the metabolite: [6S]-5-methyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)2336.24432
L-LV(60)1258.60184
Mod(200)2277.89290
Mod(60)997.74091

[back to top]

AUC(0-2h) of [6S]-5-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 2 hours, for the metabolite [6S]-5-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)827.1083
L-LV(60)640.0489
Mod(200)19408.1712
Mod(60)5639.2700

[back to top]

AUC(0-2h) of [6SR]-5-formyl-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 2 hours, for the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)29911.9184
L-LV(60)7595.4599
Mod(200)0
Mod(60)0

[back to top]

AUC(Last) of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to the last time point, for the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)462.10746
L-LV(60)239.90076
Mod(200)7910.61038
Mod(60)2272.78010

[back to top]

AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-formyl-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to the last time point, for the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)43429.1885
L-LV(60)9637.0308
Mod(200)75.6174
Mod(60)50.1858

[back to top]

AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-methyl-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to the last time point, for the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)32206.2771
L-LV(60)7689.0921
Mod(200)21737.2428
Mod(60)5495.1924

[back to top]

AUC(Last) of [6S]-5-THF

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to the last time point, for the metabolite [6S]-5-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionmcg*h/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)2231.1443
L-LV(60)640.0489
Mod(200)28466.5389
Mod(60)6766.9104

[back to top]

Cmax of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Maximum concentration (Cmax) in plasma of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)195.0000
L-LV(60)123.0000
Mod(200)22087.5000
Mod(60)6452.8571

[back to top]

Cmax of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Plasma

Maximum concentration (Cmax) in plasma of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R] 5,10- methylene-THF and the metabolites: [6S]-5-THF, [6S]-5-methyl-THF, and [6S]-5-formyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)32962.5000
L-LV(60)10168.3333
Mod(200)252.7500
Mod(60)261.0000

[back to top]

Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-THF

Correlation between the exposure of [6S]-5-THF following 2 hours after dosing (AUC[0-2h]) and the concentration of [6S]-5-THF in the tumor or adjacent mucosa at surgery. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

,,,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
AUC(0-2h) vs. conc in tumorAUC(0-2h) vs. conc in adjacent mucosa
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m2-0.021880.07937
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2NANA
Modufolin 200 mg/m20.270180.34905
Modufolin 60 mg/m20.382980.45404

[back to top]

Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-methyl-THF

Correlation between the exposure of [6S]-5-methyl-THF following 2 hours after dosing (AUC[0-2h]) and the concentration of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in the tumor or adjacent mucosa at surgery. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

,,,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
AUC(0-2h) vs. conc in tumorAUC(0-2h) vs. conc in adjacent mucosa
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m20.737430.76502
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m20.447570.34496
Modufolin 200 mg/m20.03292-0.66295
Modufolin 60 mg/m20.090330.36854

[back to top]

Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6S]-5-formyl-THF

Correlation between the exposure of [6S]-5-formyl-THF following 2 hours after dosing (AUC[0-2h]) and the concentration of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in the tumor or adjacent mucosa at surgery. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
AUC(0-2h) vs. conc in tumorAUC(0-2h) vs. conc in adjacent mucosa
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m20.687780.23512
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m20.115120.02576

[back to top]

Correlation Between Plasma and Tissue Concentration (Tumor and Mucosa) for [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF

Correlation between the exposure of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF following 2 hours after dosing (AUC[0-2h]) and the concentration of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in the tumor or adjacent mucosa at surgery. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery)

,,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
AUC(0-2h) vs. conc in tumorAUC(0-2h) vs. conc in adjacent mucosa
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m20.540390.68223
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2NANA
Modufolin 200 mg/m2-0.216660.27618

[back to top]

Cmax of [6S]-5-THF in Plasma

Maximum concentration (Cmax) in plasma of the metabolite [6S]-5-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
L-LV(200)577.6250
L-LV(60)335.0000
Mod(200)13372.5000
Mod(60)5015.7143

[back to top]

Concentration of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in mucosa adjacent to the tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m21333
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2626
Modufolin 200 mg/m25099
Modufolin 60 mg/m23481

[back to top]

Concentration of [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in Tumor Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the active substance in Modufolin: [6R]-5,10-methylene-THF in tumor tissue after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m21871
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2959
Modufolin 200 mg/m24725
Modufolin 60 mg/m22393

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF in mucosa adjacent to the tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m25456
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m21403
Modufolin 200 mg/m282
Modufolin 60 mg/m242

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-formyl-THF in Tumor Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF in tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m23611
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m2512
Modufolin 200 mg/m2100
Modufolin 60 mg/m257

[back to top]

Concentration of [6S]-5-methyl-THF in Adjacent Mucosa Tissue

Comparison of concentration of the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF in mucosa adjacent to the tumor after the different treatments. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Sample taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) at 0 min (before anesthetics) and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360 min after study drug administration, and 24 h after study drug administration

Interventionpmol/g (Mean)
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m23667
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m21216
Modufolin 200 mg/m22494
Modufolin 60 mg/m22066

[back to top]

Change in S-Folate Concentration From Screening

Blood samples for folate biomarker (S-folate) analysis were collected at Screening, Day 2 and Day 5 (End of study visit). Changes from screening to later visits were counted. (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken at Screening visit, Day 2 and End of Study (Day 5)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Shift from Normal at Screen to High at Day 2Missing data Screen to Day 2Normal at Screening and Normal at Day 5Shift from Normal at Screen to High at Day 5Missing data Screen to Day 5
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m280080
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m251141
Modufolin 200 mg/m280161
Modufolin 60 mg/m270340

[back to top]

Change in Homocystein Concentration From Screening

"Blood samples for folate biomarker (homocystein) analysis were collected at Screening, Day 2 and Day 5 (End of study visit). Changes from screening to later visits were counted.~The criteria for assessment categories normal, low and high were based on the reference ranges for plasma-Homocystein as follows: low <4,7 mcmol/L; normal => 4,7 and <=16 mcmol/L; high >16 mcmol/L. Values were applicable for both male and female adults." (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken at Screening visit, Day 2 and End of Study (Day 5)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Normal at Screen and Normal at Day 2Shift from Normal at Screen to Low at Day 2Shift from High at Screen to Normal at Day 2Normal at Screen and Normal at Day 5Shift from Normal at Screen to Low at Day 5Shift from High at Screen and Normal at Day 5Missing data Screen to Day 5
Levoleucovorin 200 mg/m24226020
Levoleucovorin 60 mg/m24204101
Modufolin 200 mg/m24135030
Modufolin 60 mg/m25025020

[back to top]

Tmax of [6S]-5-THF

Timepoint (tmax) when Cmax in plasma occurs for the metabolite [6S]-5-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)2.02083375
L-LV(60)1.50000000
Mod(200)0.38541750
Mod(60)0.09523571

[back to top]

Tmax of [6S]-5-methyl-THF

Timepoint (tmax) when Cmax in plasma occurs for the metabolite [6S]-5-methyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)4.75000000
L-LV(60)2.41666667
Mod(200)3.75000000
Mod(60)2.92857143

[back to top]

Tmax of [6S]-5-formyl-THF

Timepoint (tmax) when Cmax in plasma occurs for the metabolite [6S]-5-formyl-THF (NCT01681472)
Timeframe: Samples taken Day 1 (Day of surgery) and Day 2

Interventionh (Mean)
L-LV(200)0.12499750
L-LV(60)0.08333000
Mod(200)0.10416500
Mod(60)0.08333000

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate was calculated by adding complete and partial responses and stable disease. (NCT01718873)
Timeframe: At weeks 12 and 24 from randomization and every 3 months thereafter, assessed up to 90 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab Before Chemotherapy107
Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy103

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Patients alive at the time of the final analysis were censored on the date of the last follow-up information available. (NCT01718873)
Timeframe: assessed up to 90 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab Before Chemotherapy29.8
Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy24.1

[back to top]

Toxic Effects

Toxic effects were scored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. For the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 scale score range from 1 to 4. A high score, that is 3 and 4, represents a high level of toxicity, whereas the minimum values, that is 1 and 2, represents a mild/modest level of toxicity. (NCT01718873)
Timeframe: up to 4 weeks after the end of the treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab Before Chemotherapy108
Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy113

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

"Objective response rate (ORR), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, was the primary end point and was defined as the number of complete plus partial responses divided by the number of enrolled patients.~Per RECIST v 1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01718873)
Timeframe: Objective response was assessed by computed tomographic scan or other appropriate imaging at weeks 12 and 24 from randomization, and every 3 months thereafter, assessed up to 90 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bevacizumab Before Chemotherapy65
Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy66

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression or death, whichever occurred first. Patients without progression were censored on the date of the last follow-up visit.~Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT01718873)
Timeframe: assessed up to 90 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab Before Chemotherapy11.7
Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy10.5

[back to top]

Time to PFS2

Time to PFS2 was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression after reinduction of second-line therapy, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was defined as sum of longest diameters increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study. The sum of longest diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during second-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab18.76
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab13.17
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab14.75
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab15.08

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to any cause (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab33.97
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab28.32
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab30.65
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab28.32

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab100
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab98.9
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab100
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab99.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response During First-Line Therapy (ORR1)

ORR1 was the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during first-line therapy as assessed by investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1). CR was defined as disappearance of all extranodal target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes had to have decreased to <10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR1 = CR + PR (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during first-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.0
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.8
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab62.1
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival During First-Line Therapy (PFS1)

PFS1 was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression during first-line therapy, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was defined as sum of longest diameters increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study. The sum of longest diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during first-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.86
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.37
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab9.46
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.70

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Considered by the Investigator to be Unresectable on Study Enrollment Who Subsequently Underwent Attempted Curative Resections of Metastases

The proportion of participants considered by the investigator to be unresectable at study enrollment who subsequently underwent attempted curative resections of metastases was calculated as follows: number of participants considered by the investigator to be unresectable at study enrollment who subsequently underwent attempted curative resections of metastases divided by total number of participants in each arm. This outcome represents a measure of the rate of conversion from unresectable to resectable disease. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.24
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.17
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab0.14
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.21

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Underwent Liver Metastases Resections

Reported here is the proportion of participants who underwent liver metastases resections calculated as follows: number of participants who underwent liver metastases resections divided by total number of participants in each arm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.17
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.10
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab0.08
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.14

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Plasma Irinotecan (n=10)Plasma SN-38 (n=4)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI17700341

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=5)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI31223.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI32124.4

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Plasma IrinotecanPlasma SN-38
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI16900344

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI90.82.83

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Plasma IrinotecanPlasma SN-38
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI222032.2

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Plasma Irinotecan (n=10)Plasma SN-38 (n=5)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI5.1910.3

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Tmax) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept in Cycle 1: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventiondays (Median)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.0713.97

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventiondays (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI4.47

[back to top]

Steady State Drug Concentration (Css) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of 5-FU in combination with aflibercept and irinotecan in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 2.5, 21 and 45 hours post 5-FU infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI930

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionliter/day (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.8053

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/day (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.716

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/hour (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI18.3

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionliters (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI6.197

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliters (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI3.53

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI92.5

[back to top]

Aflibercept Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay

Blood samples of participants were analyzed by using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect aflibercept ADA in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative, competitive ligand binding assay to detect NAb. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline, at any time post baseline and 90 days after the last dose of aflibercept

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At baseline in the ADA assay (n=62)At any time post-baseline in the ADA assay (n=62)At any time post-baseline in the NAb assay (n=62)At 90 days after last dose in the ADA assay (n=50)At 90 days after last dose in NAb assay (n=50)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI10000

[back to top]

Active Metabolite SN-38 / Irinotecan Ratio on Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (Rmet): Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non - compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionratio (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.0313

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI304.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI355

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI246.9

[back to top]

Clearance at Steady State (CLss) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of 5-FU in combination with aflibercept and irinotecan in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 2.5, 21 and 45 hours post 5-FU infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/hour (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI122

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI73.19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened during the on--treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: First dose (Day 1 of Cycle 1) of study treatment up to end of treatment visit (30 days after last dose of study treatment) (maximum duration: 77 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI62

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the participant was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline up to death or study cut--off (maximum duration: 24.7 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI15.59

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall response in participants was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; any lymph node (target or non-target) must have reduction in the short axis to <10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Percentage of participants with overall response and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided. The 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks until DP (maximum duration: 16.4 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI8.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first observation of DP or death due to any cause, whichever came first. If death or progression was not observed, the participant was censored at the date of participant's last valid progression-free tumor assessment prior to the study cut-off date. DP for PFS was assessed by the IRRC based on tumor imaging according to RECIST 1.1. Progression in disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study with absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks until DP or death, due to any cause (maximum duration: 16.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI5.42

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving R0 Resection (R0 Resection Rate)

The percentage of participants achieving R0 resection, defined as the absence of gross and microscopic tumor involvement in the resection margins, will be determined for those participants who receive at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. A 90% confidence interval will be determined. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)55.6

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall Response Rate, defined as the percentage of patients that achieved Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) as per the Response evaluation in solid tumors criteria, was assessed using RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is defined as having at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Higher percentages of PR and CR are associated with more favorable outcomes (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Median Overall Survival defined as the the duration of time from diagnosis to the time of death from any cause will be determined. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)35.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Able to Undergo Resection

The percentage of participants with resectable or borderline resectable disease to undergo resection will be determined. The ability for patients to complete preoperative therapy and undergo resection is correlated with more favorable overall survival outcomes. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)15

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of disease progression will be analyzed. Median progression free survival will be presented. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to time of progression, assessed up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)34

[back to top]

Toxicities Associated With Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy

The number of patients who experienced treatment related adverse events will be determined for all patients who received at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. These events will be graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)22

[back to top]

Vascular Reconstruction

The percentage of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy requiring vascular reconstruction will be evaluated. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in CRT at Week 16

CRT was measured by SD-OCT, a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. All images were transmitted to the central reading center. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (<4, >=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline CRT. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Part A)0.0
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)-6.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at Week 16

BCVA score is based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters, and then at 1 meter. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (<4, >=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline BCVA. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Part A)3.5
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)9.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) At Week 16

CRT was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. All images were transmitted to the central reading center. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (<4, >=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline CRT. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionµm (microns) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Part A)-8.9
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)-35.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VH Scale at Week 16

Change from baseline in VH scale was evaluated on Miami 9-step scale. VH is the obscuration of fundus by vitreous cells and protein exudation. Each of the 9-step scale (from grade 0 [low opacity] to 8 [more opacity]) images (in increasing order of opacity) were equivalent to approximately 0.3 log units of degradation in visual acuity based on the Bangerter calibration. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated using mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) model with treatment groups, visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects as well as fixed continuous covariate of baseline adjudicated VH. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Part A)-0.1
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)-0.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Score = 0 or At Least 2-step Reduction in Score at Week 16

Participants with AC cell score = 0 or with ≥2 step reduction from baseline at Week 16 were evaluated. Slit lamp examinations were conducted at each visit to assess AC cell count. The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm × 1 mm slit beam was used to determine the grade according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria: grade 0 = no cells; grade +0.5 = 1 - 5 cells; grade +1 = 6 - 25 cells; grade +2= 26 - 50 cells; grade +3 = too many to count. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo (Part A)86.7
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)86.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 2-step Reduction in Vitreous Haze (VH) or Prednisone Dose <10 mg/Day at Week 16

At least 2-step reduction in VH per central review from baseline was evaluated on Miami 9-step scale. VH is the obscuration of fundus by vitreous cells and protein exudation. Each of the 9-step scale (from grade 0 [low opacity] to 8 [more opacity]) images (in increasing order of opacity) are equivalent to approximately 0.3 log units of degradation in visual acuity based on the Bangerter calibration. Participants with prednisone dose <10 mg/day (or equivalent oral corticosteroid) were also evaluated. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo (Part A)30.0
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)46.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prednisone Dose of ≤5 mg/Day (or Equivalent Oral Corticosteroid) at Week 16

Participants with prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day (or equivalent oral corticosteroid) at Week 16 were evaluated. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo (Part A)40.0
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A)41.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment: Serum Functional Sarilumab Concentration

Serum functional (unbound) sarilumab concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 294 ng/mL. Concentrations below LLOQ were set to zero for samples at predose. Post-treatment concentrations below LLOQ were replaced by LLOQ/2. The samples were considered non-eligible for the analysis if the previous dosing time was <11 days or >17 days before the sampling time for every other week regimens. (NCT01900431)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 (Baseline), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 52, and end of study (EOS) (Week 56)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
At BaselineAt Week 2At Week 4At Week 8At Week 12At Week 16At Week 24At Week 36At Week 52EOS (Week 56)
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (Part A + Part B)0.07383.39876.615958.919705.219598.422406.824375.425046.01730.0

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. Progression is defined as At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)8.0
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)13.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Objective Response

"Objective response (defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria)~CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.~PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters." (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 4 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)25
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)22

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)8.4
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)13.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from date of diagnosis to date of death from any cause. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)15.5
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)19.6

[back to top]

Toxicity and Tolerability (Arm A and Arm B) as Measured by the Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

(NCT01928290)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of treatment (estimated to be 5 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaFebrile neutropeniaAnal FistulaDiarrheaHematemesisNauseaPeripheral ischemiaVomitingFatigueLaparoscopy surgeryPainSepsisLung infectionPneumoniaHypernatremiaNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedAnorexiaDehydrationHypokalemiaBack painPeripheral sensory neuropathySyncopeDyspneaPleural embolismSkin infectionThromboembolic eventAbdominal painEnterocolitisHemorrhoidsG-tube infectionNeutropenic entercolitisAlkaline phosphatase increased
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)1214121341111111933411211114000000
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)000502010000000800020010000111111

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)5.8
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)10.5

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

"Clinical benefit rate is the percentage of combined patients who have achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)~CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm~PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters~SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study." (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 4 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)33
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)22

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)

Time from date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration or death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive without report of progression are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX6.2
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH204.3

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Survival

"Time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact.~Assessed using the logrank test." (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX14.4
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH207.7

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX

"Assess safety of mFOLFIRINOX in combination with PEGPH20 and select the optimal dose of PEGPH20 for the Phase II portion.~MTD of PEGPH20 in combination with mFOLFORINOX was evaluated by testing decreasing doses of PEGPH20 from 3mcg/kg on Day 1 and Day 3/4, to 3mcg/kg on Day 1 only and to 1.6 mcg/kg on Day 1 only.~MTD reflects the highest dose that had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of ≤ 17%. DLTs were defined as treatment regimen related: grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity; grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (ANC) anemia or thrombocytopenia; grade 4 ANC lasting > 7 days; grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia; grade ≥ 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, and creatinine; delay in starting the 2nd cycle of mFOLFIRINOX by > 2 weeks due to drug related toxicity.~DLT were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4. Note: the third and lowest dose level was not reached." (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: 2 cycles of 14 days

Interventionug/kg (Number)
Phase I: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH20, 3 ug/kg on Day 1 and Day 3/40
Phase I: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH20, 3 ug/kg on Day 13
All Phase 1 Participants3

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial)

"Objective tumor response rate (complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response, unconfirmed partial response) in patients with measurable disease were assessed in each arm and compared between arms using Chi-squared test.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions" (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX45
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH2033

[back to top] [back to top]

Distant Failure-free Survival

Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, medians and ranges. (NCT01959672)
Timeframe: Date of administration study drug to the date of first appearance of tumor lesions by imaging, or death, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Oregovomab, SBRT, Surgery)11

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, medians and ranges. (NCT01959672)
Timeframe: Date of first of study drug to the date of death, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Oregovomab, SBRT, Surgery)14.4

[back to top]

Surgical Complete Resection (Negative Margin) Rate

The percentage of patients who will undergo R0 resection (NCT01959672)
Timeframe: Up to week 18

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Oregovomab, SBRT, Surgery)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CA-125-Specific T-cell Signal.

The percentage of patients responding will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. (NCT01959672)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Oregovomab, SBRT, Surgery)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease,

Rate of progressive disease defined as at least a 25% increase in the longest diameter of a lesion, taking as reference the longest diameter recorded since the treatment started. An exact one-sided 90% confidence interval will be constructed round the progressive disease rate. (NCT01959672)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Oregovomab, SBRT, Surgery)2

[back to top]

One-Year Rate of Failure-Free Survival (FFS)

Rate of failure-free survival of study participants one-year after start of protocol therapy. Failure-free survival (FFS) will be measured from the date of treatment initiation until date of documented disease progression, relapse after response, or death from any cause. For patients alive and free of relapse or progression, follow-up time will be censored at the last documented date of failure-free status. Kaplan-Meier estimate of failure-free survival at one-year. (NCT01964755)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy + Antiviral-Based Therapy37.5

[back to top]

One-year Rate of Overall Survival

Rate of overall survival of study participants at one year since initiation of protocol therapy. Overall survival (OS) will be measured from the date of initiation of study treatment until date of death from any cause. In the absence of death, the follow-up will be censored at date of last contact (censored observation). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at one-year. (NCT01964755)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy + Antiviral-Based Therapy83.3

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Response to Protocol Therapy

"Complete Response (CR) rate in study participants to protocol therapy. Response will be assessed via CT Scan and bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, if applicable. Complete response criteria include:~Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities definitely assignable to Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL);~All lymph nodes and tumor masses disappeared or regressed to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameters for nodes > 1.5 cm before therapy);~Previously involved nodes that were 1.1 to 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) before treatment must have decreased to ≤ 1 cm in their GTD after treatment, or by more than 75% bin the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD);~No new sites of disease." (NCT01964755)
Timeframe: About 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemotherapy + Antiviral-Based Therapy3

[back to top]

HIV Viral Load in Positive Subjects Before, During and After Protocol Therapy

Measurement of HIV Viral Load in positive subjects before, during and after protocol therapy to assess the effect of protocol therapy on immune reconstitution or exhaustion. (NCT01964755)
Timeframe: From Baseline Up to 1 Year Post-Therapy

Interventioncopies/ml (Number)
Before TherapyDuring TherapyAfter Therapy
Chemotherapy + Antiviral-Based Therapy333NANA

[back to top] [back to top]

T-Cell Subset Levels in Peripheral Blood in Positive Participants Before, During and After Protocol Therapy

Measurement of T-cell subset levels (CD4, CD8) in peripheral blood before, during and after protocol therapy to assess the effect of protocol therapy on immune re-constitution or exhaustion. (NCT01964755)
Timeframe: From Baseline Up to 1 Year Post-Therapy

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Mean)
CD4 count, Before TherapyCD4 count, During TherapyCD4 count, After TherapyCD8 count, Before TherapyCD8 count, During TherapyCD8 count, After Thaerapy
Chemotherapy + Antiviral-Based Therapy328285323.5124610061006

[back to top]

Number of AEs Per Severity (All Courses)

Characterization (number and severity grade) of toxicity reported for each course of HDMTX treatment with folate rescue therapy and continuing until eight (8) days after start of HDMTX administration, per NCI CTCAE v4.0 (Grade refers to the severity of the AE). The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE; Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening, and Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: From the start of HDMTX administration through 8 days post dose for each course of HDMTX in total

,
InterventionNumber of AEs (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Cohort 1408113
Cohort 2271561

[back to top]

Number of Grade A1, Grade A2, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D Excretion Toxicities as Listed in the MTX-toxicity Management Instructions

The MTX-toxicity management instructions provided in the protocol are based on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) treatment management recommendations used in study protocol AOST0331, EURAMOS 1. The COG recommend changes in the hydration and the rescue frequency and/or dose to be done if pre-specified toxicities of different severity grades occur. (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
InterventionNumber of MTX excretion toxicities (Number)
Grade A2 (24h) SOC 1Grade A2 (24h) SOC 2Grade A2 (24h) MOD 1Grade A2 (24h) MOD 2Grade B (24h) SOC 1Grade B (24h) SOC 2Grade B (24h) MOD 1Grade B (24h) MOD 2None (24h) SOC 1None (24h) SOC 2None (24h) MOD 1None (24h) MOD 2Grade A2 (48h) SOC 1Grade A2 (48h) SOC 2Grade A2 (48h) MOD 1Grade A2 (48h) MOD 2Grade B (48h) SOC 1Grade B (48h) SOC 2Grade B (48h) MOD 1Grade B (48h) MOD 2None (48h) SOC 1None (48h) SOC 2None (48h) MOD 1None (48h) MOD 2Grade A1 (72h) SOC 1Grade A1 (72h) SOC 2Grade A1 (72h) MOD 1Grade A1 (72h) MOD 2Grade A2 (72h) SOC 1Grade A2 (72h) SOC 2Grade A2 (72h) MOD 1Grade A2 (72h) MOD 2Grade B (72h) SOC 1Grade B (72h) SOC 2Grade B (72h) MOD 1Grade B (72h) MOD 2None (72h) SOC 1None (72h) SOC 2None (72h) MOD 1None (72h) MOD 2
Cohort 12212101112211122100023222212111000001122
Cohort 22231000122112121000123210110000000014332

[back to top]

Number of Ongoing AEs Per HDMTX Course

Characterization (frequency and severity grade) of toxicity reported for each course of HDMTX treatment with folate rescue therapy and continuing until eight (8) days after start of HDMTX administration, per NCI CTCAE v4.0 (Grade refers to the severity of the AE). The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE; Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening, and Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: From the start of HDMTX administration through 8 days post dose for each course of HDMTX

,
InterventionNumber of AEs (Number)
Course 1 (SOC)Course 2 (SOC)Course 1 (MOD)Course 2 (MOD)
Cohort 11419614
Cohort 210101016

[back to top]

Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed Late MTX Elimination (Definition F).

"Definition F: Delayed late MTX elimination (according to US label for Calcium Folinate)~S-MTX level:~> 0.2 μmol/L at 72 hours AND > 0.1 μmol/L at 96 hours after start of MTX administration." (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
InterventionNumber of courses (Number)
Delayed late MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Undelayed late MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Delayed late MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Undelayed late MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Delayed late MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Undelayed late MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Delayed late MTX elimination in Course MOD 2Undelayed late MTX elimination in Course MOD 2
Cohort 103030202
Cohort 201010110

[back to top]

Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed MTX Elimination (Definition D).

"Definition D: Delayed MTX elimination (according to COGs excretion toxicity management instructions)~S-MTX levels of:~> 10 μmol/L at 24 h after start of MTX administration, OR > 1 μmol/L at 48 h after start of MTX administration, OR > 0.1 μmol/L at 72 h after start of MTX administration or later" (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
InterventionNumber of courses (Number)
Delayed MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Undelayed MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Delayed MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Undelayed MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Delayed MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Undelayed MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Delayed MTX elimination in Course MOD 2Undelayed MTX elimination in Course MOD 2
Cohort 131312222
Cohort 204131312

[back to top]

Characterization (Number/Severity) of All Reported AEs During the ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD.

The severity of AEs have been done using NCI CTCAE v4.0. Total number of AEs per severity grade are presented for all AEs and for AEs related to MTX. For AEs related to MTX the number of AEs occurring per preferred term and severity grade are detailed.The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE; Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening, and Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: From the start of HDMTX administration through 8 days post dose for all 4 courses of HDMTX in total

,
InterventionNumber of AEs (Number)
Grade 1 (ALL AEs)Grade 2 (ALL AEs)Grade 3 (ALL AEs)Grade 4 (ALL AEs)Any Grade (ALL AEs)Grade 1 (AEs Related to MTX)Grade 2 (AEs Related to MTX)Grade 3 (AEs Related to MTX)Grade 4 (AEs Related to MTX)Any Grade (AEs Related to MTX)ALAT increase (Related to MTX) Grade 1ALAT increase (Related to MTX) Grade 2ALAT increase (Related to MTX) Grade 3ALAT increase (Related to MTX) Grade 4ALAT increase (Related to MTX) Any GradeAnemia (Related to MTX) Grade 1Anemia (Related to MTX) Grade 2Anemia (Related to MTX) Grade 3Anemia (Related to MTX) Grade 4Anemia (Related to MTX) Any GradeASAT increased (Related to MTX) Grade 1ASAT increased (Related to MTX) Grade 2ASAT increased (Related to MTX) Grade 3ASAT increased (Related to MTX) Grade 4ASAT increased (Related to MTX) Any GradeCheilitis (Related to MTX) Grade 1Cheilitis (Related to MTX) Grade 2Cheilitis (Related to MTX) Grade 3Cheilitis (Related to MTX) Grade 4Cheilitis (Related to MTX) Any GradeConvulsion (Related to MTX) Grade 1Convulsion (Related to MTX) Grade 2Convulsion (Related to MTX) Grade 3Convulsion (Related to MTX) Grade 4Convulsion (Related to MTX) Any GradeDiarrhoea (Related to MTX) Grade 1Diarrhoea (Related to MTX) Grade 2Diarrhoea (Related to MTX) Grade 3Diarrhoea (Related to MTX) Grade 4Diarrhoea (Related to MTX) Any GradeDrug clearance decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 1Drug clearance decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 2Drug clearance decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 3Drug clearance decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 4Drug clearance decreased (Related to MTX) AnyGradeFebrile neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 1Febrile neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 2Febrile neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 3Febrile neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 4Febrile neutropenia (Related to MTX) Any GradeHeadache (Related to MTX) Grade 1Headache (Related to MTX) Grade 2Headache (Related to MTX) Grade 3Headache (Related to MTX) Grade 4Headache (Related to MTX) Any GradeNausea (Related to MTX) Grade 1Nausea (Related to MTX) Grade 2Nausea (Related to MTX) Grade 3Nausea (Related to MTX) Grade 4Nausea (Related to MTX) Any GradeNephropathy (Related to MTX) Grade 1Nephropathy (Related to MTX) Grade 21Nephropathy (Related to MTX) Grade 3Nephropathy (Related to MTX) Grade 4Nephropathy (Related to MTX) Any GradeNeutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 1Neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 2Neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 3Neutropenia (Related to MTX) Grade 4Neutropenia (Related to MTX) Any GradeNeutrophil count decrease (Related to MTX) Grade 1Neutrophil count decrease (Related to MTX) Grade 2Neutrophil count decrease (Related to MTX) Grade 3Neutrophil count decrease (Related to MTX) Grade 4Neutrophil count decrease (Related to MTX)AnyGradePyrexia (Related to MTX) Grade 1Pyrexia (Related to MTX) Grade 2Pyrexia (Related to MTX) Grade 3Pyrexia (Related to MTX) Grade 4Pyrexia (Related to MTX) Any GradeStomatitis (Related to MTX) Grade 1Stomatitis (Related to MTX) Grade 2Stomatitis (Related to MTX) Grade 3Stomatitis (Related to MTX) Grade 4Stomatitis (Related to MTX) Any GradeVomiting (Related to MTX) Grade 1Vomiting (Related to MTX) Grade 2Vomiting (Related to MTX) Grade 3Vomiting (Related to MTX) Grade 4Vomiting (Related to MTX) Any GradeWBC count decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 1WBC count decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 2WBC count decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 3WBC count decreased (Related to MTX) Grade 4WBC count decreased (Related to MTX) Any Grade
Cohort 14081136225661382141834007502070000000000210030000000000100012000200000000000000010001000009000900000
Cohort 2271569492012513803003000002000212000001010000010001001010100142006100010001100101000003210682001000101

[back to top]

Number of HDMTX Courses With Delayed Early MTX Elimination (Definition E).

"Definition E: Delayed early MTX elimination (according to US label for Calcium Folinate)~S-MTX levels of:~50 μmol/L at 24 hours after start of MTX administration, OR~5 μmol/L at 48 hours after start of MTX administration OR An increase in S-Creatinine level of 100% or greater at 24 hours after start of MTX administration." (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
InterventionNumber of courses (Number)
Delayed early MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Undelayed early MTX elimination in Course SOC 1Delayed early MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Undelayed early MTX elimination in Course SOC 2Delayed early MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Undelayed early MTX elimination in Course MOD 1Delayed early MTX elimination in Course MOD 2Undelayed early MTX elimination in Course MOD 2
Cohort 104040404
Cohort 204040403

[back to top]

Number of Administered MAP Cycles Classified as Having Met the Criteria for Successful Advancement From First to Second HDMTX Course Within the Same MAP Cycle According to Definition A.

"Definition A: Successful advancement from first to second HDMTX course within the same MAP cycle~Fulfilling all of the following criteria 8 days after start of first HDMTX course within the same MAP cycle:~Serum MTX: ≤ 0.1 μmol/L~Neutrophils: ≥ 0.25 x 109/L~Platelets: ≥ 50 x 109/L~Serum bilirubin: ≤ 1.25 x ULN~GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73 m2~No AE Grade 2 or more (NCI CTCAE v4.0) related to HDMTX hindering a potential HDMTX administration, at the discretion of the investigator" (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: 8 days after start of first HDMTX course in a MAP cycle

,
InterventionNumber of courses (Number)
Successful Course SOC 1Unsuccessful Course SOC 1Successful Course MOD 1Unsuccessful Course MOD 1
Cohort 14040
Cohort 24031

[back to top]

Time to Successful MTX Elimination (Definition C)

Definition C: Time to successful MTX elimination = Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Time (h) Course SOC 1Time (h) Course SOC 2Time (h) Course MOD 1Time (h) Course MOD 2
Cohort 184.5277.074.0072.50
Cohort 262.7562.7565.7588.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Administered HDMTX Courses Classified as Having Met the Criteria for Successful Advancement According to Definition A and/or Definition B

"Definition A: Successful advancement from 1st to 2nd HDMTX course within the same MAP cycle. Fulfilling all of the following criteria 8 days after start of first HDMTX course within the same MAP cycle:~Serum MTX: ≤0.1μmol/L~Neutrophils: ≥0.25x109/L~Platelets: ≥50x109/L~Serum bilirubin: ≤1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN)~Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥70 mL/min/1.73m2~No AE Grade 2 or more related to HDMTX hindering a potential HDMTX administration, at the discretion of the investigator~Definition B: Successful advancement to next MAP cycle~Fulfilling all of the following criteria 8 days after start of the second HDMTX course in previous MAP cycle:~Serum MTX: ≤0.1μmol/L~Neutrophils: ≥ 0.75 x 109/L~Platelets: ≥75x109/L~Serum bilirubin: ≤1.25xULN~GFR ≥70 mL/min/1.73m2~No AE Grade 2 or more related to HDMTX hindering a potential Adriamycin/Doxorubicin and Cisplatin (AP) administration, at the discretion of the investigator" (NCT01987102)
Timeframe: 8 days after start of first and/or second HDMTX course in a MAP cycle

,
InterventionNumber of courses (Number)
Successful Course SOC 1Unsuccessful Course SOC 1Successful Course SOC 2Unsuccessful Course SOC 2Successful Course MOD 1Unsuccessful Course MOD 1Successful Course MOD 2Unsuccessful Course MOD 2
Cohort 140404040
Cohort 240403121

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of HDMTX Courses in Which the Initial Hydration Was Increased

(NCT01987102)
Timeframe: Time from start of MTX treatment until serum MTX level is ≤ 0.1 μmol/L

,
InterventionHDMTX courses (Number)
Hydration change in Course SOC 1Unchanged hydration Course SOC 1Hydration change in Course SOC 2Unchanged hydration Course SOC 2Hydration change in Course MOD 1Unchanged hydration Course MOD 1Hydration change in course MOD 2Unchanged hydration Course MOD 2
Cohort 122132222
Cohort 204042212

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

Number of DLTs per dose level and the MTD/MFD. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: Day 28 of course 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1: (NSC 5x10^7 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 2: (NSC 1x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 3 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg + Leucovorin + Microdialysis1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Mechanical Issues With Repeat Administrations of NSCs Via Rickham

Number of participants with mechanical issues with repeat administrations of NSCs via Rickham. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: 28 days after last infusion of NSCs, up to 6 months total

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1 (NSC 5x10^7 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 2 (NSC 1x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 3 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg) + Leucovorin + Microdialysis0

[back to top]

Average Steady State Levels of 5-FC and 5-FU in the Brain

Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the patients who undergo intracerebral microdialysis (dose level 4) will be summarized using descriptive statistics. All summaries will be exploratory in spirit. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: Following the first dose of 5-FC, samples were collected every hour for 24 hours and then every 3 hours thereafter until the end of the 7-day course of 5-FC or until the microdialysis catheter stopped functioning.

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
average steady state levels of 5-FC in the brainaverage steady state levels of 5-FU in the brain
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg) + Leucovorin + Microdialysis2130.03

[back to top]

Number of Participants Developing Antibodies Against NSCs

Development of a antibody response to the NSCs will be evaluated by flow cytometry. Data from assessing for possible development of NSC immunogenicity with repeat exposure will be presented in an exploratory fashion using descriptive statistics. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: While receiving treatment, up to 6 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1 (NSC 5x10^7 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 2 (NSC 1x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)2
Dose Level 3 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg)0
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg) + Leucovorin + Microdialysis1

[back to top]

Average Steady State Levels of 5-FC Concentrations in Plasma

PK data from the patients who undergo intracerebral microdialysis (dose level 4) will be summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: Samples were obtained prior to the first dose of 5-FC then every 30 minutes for 3 hours, additional samples at 4 and 6 hours after the morning doses on days 4, 5. On days 6, 7, 8 blood samples were collected just before morning dose and 90 minutes later

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg) + Leucovorin + Microdialysis748

[back to top]

Comparison of 5-FC in the Brain to 5-FC in the Plasma

PK data from the patients who undergo intracerebral microdialysis (dose level 4) will be summarized using the mean ratio of average brain interstitial 5-FC concentrations to the average steady-state plasma levels. (NCT02015819)
Timeframe: The ratio of average brain interstitial 5-FC and 5-FU concentrations to average plasma steady-state levels was calculated using all measured data.

Interventionratio (Mean)
Dose Level 4 (NSC 1.5x10^8 and 5-FC 37.5 mg/kg) + Leucovorin + Microdialysis29

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Confirmed response (CR) is two or more objective statuses of CR a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Partial response (PR) is two or more objective statuses of PR or better a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Unconfirmed CR is one objective status of CR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR or PR. Unconfirmed PR is one objective status of PR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR, PR or unconfirmed CR. (NCT02042443)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from registration

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial ResponseUnconfirmed Partial ResponseStable/No ResponseIncreasing DiseaseSymptomatic Deterioration
Chemotherapy20981
Trametinib022191

[back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02042443)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Trametinib4.3
Chemotherapy7.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02042443)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Trametinib1.3
Chemotherapy2.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the t1/2 calculated at Cycle 7 (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: t1/2: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionh (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)294
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).289

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare efficacy in terms of ORR between arms. Clinical and radiological tumor assessments were performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.~Objective response (OR) is defined as a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) as defined by RECIST v1.1. All participants who did not meet the criteria for CR or PR by the end of the study were considered non-responders." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Every four weeks. Up to 48 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ORR (CR+PR)Stable diseaseProgressive diseaseunevaluable
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)402524
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)352745

[back to top]

Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Immunogenicity profile by means of measurement of ADA developed de novo (seroconversion) after cycle 5, cycle 8, and 12 months after first drug administration (pre-dose). (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: At baseline, and on Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycles: 1, 5 and 8, and 12 months after first drug administration

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SeroconversionNo seroconversion
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)071
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)267

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Vd calculated at Cycle 7 (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Vd: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

InterventionL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)4.06
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).3.86

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"Compare PFS between the randomized treatment arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression using RECIST v1.1, or death. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions plus 5 mm absolute increase, and/or unequivocal progression of known non-target lesion, and/or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)10.8
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)11.1

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Kel calculated at Cycle 7 (Ctrough,ss) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Kel: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionl/h (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)0.00236
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).0.00240

[back to top]

Ctrough,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Ctrough calculated at Cycle 7 (Ctrough,ss) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Ctrough, ss: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)69600
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).69300

[back to top]

Ctrough,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Ctrough calculated at Cycle 1 (Ctrough,sd ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Ctrough, sd: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)344
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).349

[back to top]

Cmax,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Cmax calculated at Cycle 7 (Cmax, ss ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Cmax, ss: 0 to 336 hours post-dose after the administration of Cycle 7 infusion (Week 13)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)195000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).200000

[back to top]

Cmax,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Cmax calculated at Cycle 1 (Cmax,sd ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Cmax, sd: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)120000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).123000

[back to top]

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported With BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Compare the safety profile by means of the frequency and severity of TEAEs and SAEs reported in each treatment arm. (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: From first study dose and up to 30 days after the end of study treatment for each patient, for an average of 11 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAE (any causality)Any grade>=3 TEAEAny TEAE leading to discontinuationAny treatment-related TEAEAny grade >=3 treatment-related TEAEAny serious TEAEAny bleeding event
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)7149670702119
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)66441363631914

[back to top]

AUC at Steady State (AUCss) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare the PK profile of BEVZ92 and Avastin®, both administered in combination with FOLFOX (any) or FOLFIRI, by means of comparing the truncated area under the concentration-versus-time curve calculated over a dosage interval at steady state (i.e. at Cycle 7; AUCss).~For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% CI of the ratio of a log-transformed exposure measure (AUC) falls completely within the range 80-125%." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: AUCss: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of Cycle 7 infusion (Week 13).

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)35900000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).35700000

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) at Cycle 1 (AUC0-336h) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BEVZ92 and Avastin®, both administered in combination with FOLFOX (any) or FOLFIRI, by means of comparing the truncated AUC calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1; AUC0-336h)~For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of a log-transformed exposure measure (AUC) falls completely within the range 80-125%." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: AUC0-336 hrs: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)16500000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).16600000

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (treatment failure, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Two-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)39.04
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)54.44

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients

OS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Two-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)58.40
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)71.33

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)58.94
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)67.00

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients

OS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Three-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)88.29
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)90.37

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)

Cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse adjusting for competing risks using the method of: Gray R, A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1141:1154, 1988 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Isolated CNS RelapseIsolated Bone Marrow RelapseCombined Bone Marrow Relapse
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients2.23.01.8
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients3.61.41.3

[back to top]

EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients88.3
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients88.8

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3

EFS will be calculated as time from the end of the three high-risk blocks of therapy to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-ALL MRD Undetectable25.0
VHR T-ALL MRD Detectable88.9

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond

EFS for very high risk (VHR) T-LLy patients treated with HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) intensification blocks who have complete or partial remission and those who do not respond (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-LLy (CR/PR)0

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year EFS rates will be calculated for both groups. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Combination Chemotherapy)81.7
Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy, Bortezomib)85.1

[back to top]

Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase

Percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3 or higher Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years from start of therapy by patient

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total Patients78.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHAs) Against Vanucizumab

Safety is evaluated in terms of number of participants with Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHAs) Against Vanucizumab. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: End of study (EoS, within 28 to 42 days after last dose, latest at 29 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Safety Run-In2
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-61

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Safety is evaluated in terms of percentage of participants with at least one serious adverse event and percentage of participants with at least one adverse event. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 29 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Serious Adverse eventsAdverse events
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-643.2100.0
Safety Run-In37.5100
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-649.5100.0

[back to top]

Cmax Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Cmax Ratio, values are reported for cycle 8 of both part 1 (safety run-in) and part 2 of the study. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycle 8

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Safety Run-In1.51
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-61.63

[back to top]

Plasma Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of CLss, values are reported for cycle 8 of both part 1 (safety run-in) and part 2 of the study. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycle 8

Interventionml/hr (Geometric Mean)
Safety Run-In15.3
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-618.0

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed Using RECIST v. 1.1

Efficacy of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of duration of objective response as assessed using RECIST v. 1.1. This was computed using the PFS definition with death on study (deaths that occurred outside the 30 days window from the last study treatment are excluded). (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 28 days prior to Day 1), then every 8 weeks until PD, start of other anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death (up to approximately 29 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6342
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6304

[back to top]

Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Clast) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Clast (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 8 of parts 1 and 2

Interventionug/ml (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 8
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6103361

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Cmax (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 8 of parts 1 and 2

,
Interventionug/ml (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 8
Safety Run-In463685
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6500794

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of AUC (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 8 of parts 1 and 2

,
Interventionhr*ug/ml (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 8
Safety Run-In73600112000
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-66350082100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (ORR) as Assessed Using RECIST v. 1.1

Efficacy of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Percentage of Participants With ORR as Investigator-Assessed Using RECIST v. 1.1. Best Overall Confirmed Response. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 28 days prior to Day 1), then every 8 weeks until progressive disease (PD), start of other anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death (up to approximately 29 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Safety Run-In62.5
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-643.6
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-651.6

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Vss, values are reported for cycle 8 of both part 1 (safety run-in) and part 2 of the study. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycle 8

Interventionml (Geometric Mean)
Safety Run-In4400
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-64140

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS), Time to Event

Efficacy of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of PFS as Investigator-Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). PFS was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Death on study was defined as death from any cause within 30 days of the last study treatment. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks, up to approximately 29 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6338.0
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6309.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Efficacy of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of OS as the time from randomization until death from any cause. 99999 = data not estimable due to the low number of deaths. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Baseline until death from any cause (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)

Interventiondays (Median)
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6746.0
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6NA

[back to top]

Plasma Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of t1/2, values are reported for cycle 8 of both part 1 (safety run-in) and part 2 of the study. (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycle 8

Interventionhr (Geometric Mean)
Safety Run-In202
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-6157

[back to top]

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Vanucizumab

PK profile of vanucizumab was evaluated in terms of Tmax (NCT02141295)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 8 of parts 1 and 2

,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 8
Safety Run-In2.794.04
Vanucizumab + mFOLFOX-62.051.58

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Skin Toxicity

"Skin toxicity was defined as events classified with an system organ class of Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders or a preferred term of paronychia." (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersParonychia
Group A17.97.1
Group B18.59.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity Graded Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3, 4 and 5
Group A019.680.4
Group B027.872.2

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from the day of randomization (Day 0) until the day of protocol treatment discontinuation determination, the day of PD decision during protocol treatment, or death from any cause, whichever came the earliest. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A8.1
Group B6.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival Rate (PFS Rate) at 9 Months After Randomization

PFS rate was defined as the gross percentage of participants who survived with no evidence of progression from the day of randomization (Day 0) until 9 months after Day 0. The presence/absence of progressive disease (PD) was determined based on imaging, consideration of clinical PD, or survival research results. PD based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months after randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A46.4
Group B47.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the day of randomization (Day 0) until death by all causes. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group ANA
Group BNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy

"Peripheral neuropathy was defined as events classified with a preferred term (PT) of peripheral neuropathy according to Standardized MedDRA Queries." (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A30.4
Group B3.7

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS is the period from the date of randomization (Day 0) until the date of judgment of progression from the date of randomization, or until death by all causes, whichever comes first. The presence/absence of progressive disease (PD) was determined based on imaging, consideration of clinical PD, or survival research results. PD based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A9.1
Group B9.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization. (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A100
Group B100

[back to top]

Response Rate (RR)

RR was defined as the percentage of participants who had shown complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as the best overall response in accordance with the RECIST 1.1 criteria after randomization. The best overall response was CR, followed by PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and not evaluable (NE). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters as the best overall response after randomization., SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). (NCT02337946)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A80.4
Group B87.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR 50) and 70% (ACR70) Response at Weeks 12 and 24

"ACR20/50/70 response is defined as a ≥20/50/70% reduction from Baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), and the following:~Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS); left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain~Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity~Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity~Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do~Acute-phase reactant: C-reactive Protein (CRP)." (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ACR 20, Week 12ACR 50, Week 12ACR 70, Week 12ACR 20, Week 24ACR 50, Week 24ACR 70, Week 24
Namilumab 150 mg/mL53.838.515.456.036.020.0
Namilumab 20 mg/mL72.020.04.065.234.813.0
Namilumab 80 mg/mL52.230.421.747.847.830.4
Placebo37.516.78.333.323.819.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Pain as Measured Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 12 and 24

Reduction of Pain, defined as a ≥40% change from Baseline as measured using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS); left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain at weeks 2, 12 and 24. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2, 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 12Week 24
Namilumab 150 mg/mL3.630.824.0
Namilumab 20 mg/mL14.344.043.5
Namilumab 80 mg/mL8.739.147.8
Placebo7.720.822.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24

The DAS28-CRP score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], general health: patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and acute phase response: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to approximately 10 (worst). Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.75
Namilumab 20 mg/mL-2.37
Namilumab 80 mg/mL-2.20
Namilumab 150 mg/mL-2.26

[back to top]

ACR Numeric (N) Index (ACRn) at Week 12

ACRn is defined as the lowest % improvement for TJC68, SJC66 and the median of 5 ACR components. These are • Patient's Assessment of Pain over previous 24 hours using a VAS; left end of line 0=no pain to right end of line 100=unbearable pain • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of line 0=no disease activity to right end of line 100=maximum disease activity • Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do • Acute-phase reactant: CRP. A positive % change indicates improvement. MMRM model with main effects for study site, treatment, visit, and previously failed medication with interactions between visit and treatment and visit and previously failed medication and participant used as a random effect with an unstructured covariance structure. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-17.25
Namilumab 20 mg/mL3.97
Namilumab 80 mg/mL19.68
Namilumab 150 mg/mL17.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12

The DAS28-CRP score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], general health: patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and acute phase response: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to approximately 10 (worst). Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with main effects for study site, treatment, visit, and previously failed medication with interactions between visit and treatment, visit and previously failed medication, and visit and baseline value as a covariate and participant as a random effect with an unstructured covariance structure was used for analysis. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.77
Namilumab 20 mg/mL-1.38
Namilumab 80 mg/mL-1.36
Namilumab 150 mg/mL-1.69

[back to top]

ACR Numeric (N) Index (ACRn) at Week 24

ACRn is defined as the lowest % improvement for TJC68, SJC66 and the median of 5 ACR components. These are • Patient's Assessment of Pain over previous 24 hours using a VAS; left end of line 0=no pain to right end of line 100=unbearable pain • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of line 0=no disease activity to right end of line 100=maximum disease activity • Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do • Acute-phase reactant: CRP. A positive % change indicates improvement. MMRM model with main effects for study site, treatment, visit, and previously failed medication with interactions between visit and treatment and visit and previously failed medication and participant used as a random effect with an unstructured covariance structure. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo34.04
Namilumab 20 mg/mL35.35
Namilumab 80 mg/mL44.66
Namilumab 150 mg/mL36.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 6, and 10

The DAS28-CRP score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], general health: patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and acute phase response: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to approximately 10 (worst). Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A MMRM model with main effects for study site, treatment, visit, and previously failed medication with interactions between visit and treatment, visit and previously failed medication, and visit and baseline value as a covariate and participant as a random effect with an unstructured covariance structure was used for analysis. (NCT02379091)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 6 and 10

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 6Change at Week 10
Namilumab 150 mg/mL-0.95-1.42-1.51
Namilumab 20 mg/mL-0.58-1.13-1.19
Namilumab 80 mg/mL-0.84-1.37-1.39
Placebo-0.33-0.70-0.75

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events

"Secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy and tolerability of selinexor in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by~- Toxicity (acc. to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC AE) v4.03)" (NCT02384850)
Timeframe: treatment start to up to 30 days after last dose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients with AEs of any CTCAE GradePatients with AEs of at least CTCAE Grade 3Patients with Selinexor related AEs of any GradePatients with Selinexor related AEs of at least Grade 3Patients with chemotherapy related AEs of any GradePatients with chemotherapy related AEs of at least Grade 3Patients with AEs leading to discontinuationPatients with at least 1 SAEPatients with at least 1 SAE related to SelinexorPatients with at least 1 SAE related to chemotherapy
Selinexor 20mg + mFOLFOX66645632313
Selinexor 40 mg+ mFOLFOX64444442211

[back to top]

Number of Patients Still Alive at End of Study (Overall Survival)

"Secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy and tolerability of selinexor in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by~- Overall survival (OS)~Overall survial is defined as length of time from start of treatment that patients are still alive. For this time-to-event variables the Kaplan-Meier method was intended to be used" (NCT02384850)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Selinexor 40 mg+ mFOLFOX60
Selinexor 20mg + mFOLFOX62

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy and tolerability of selinexor in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by~- Overall response rate (RR) (acc. to RECIST v1.1)~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed byCT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT02384850)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Selinexor 40 mg+ mFOLFOX60
Selinexor 20mg + mFOLFOX61

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy and tolerability of selinexor in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by~- Progression free survival (PFS) The disease status was measured by CT/MRI and evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria every 8 weeks during treatment, at End of Treatment and every 3 weeks during Follow-up to determine time until patient has Progressive Disease (PD). PD is defined according to RECIST v1.1 at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression." (NCT02384850)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Selinexor 40 mg+ mFOLFOX6NA
Selinexor 20mg + mFOLFOX6NA

[back to top]

Numbers of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities

"Primary objective is the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of selinexor in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.~Criteria to assess MTD was the experience of AEs > grade 3, discontinuation from study treatment due to adverse events or withdrawal of consent by the patients." (NCT02384850)
Timeframe: 28 days of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Discontinuation due to Adverse eventsDiscontinuation due to Withdrawal of ConsentDiscontinuation due to Progressive Disease
Selinexor 20mg + mFOLFOX6222
Selinexor 40 mg+ mFOLFOX6220

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Left-sided Tumors

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earlier of Progressive Disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death due to any cause. The left-sided tumors were defined as primary tumors occupying a left-sided site include the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy13.70
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy13.24

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants

OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy36.24
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy31.28

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in All Participants

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earlier of Progressive Disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death due to any cause. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy12.91
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy11.99

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR means that the period from the day when either CR or PR is first confirmed until the day of documented PD or the day of death due to all causes, whichever occurs earlier. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy11.86
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy10.74

[back to top]

OS in Participants With Left-sided Tumors

OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. The left-sided tumors were defined as primary tumors occupying a left-sided site include the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy37.85
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy34.30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurred in the treatment period after receiving the protocol treatment. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy402
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy398

[back to top]

Number of Participants Treated With Curative Surgical Resection After Chemotherapy

Curative surgical resection was defined as complete resection. (NCT02394795)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group P; mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy66
Group B; mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab Combination Therapy44

[back to top]

4-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate

PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. Will be estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT02508077)
Timeframe: At 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Panitumumab and FOLFIRI)0

[back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of Toxicity (CTCAE Version 4.0)

Toxicity rates will be estimated using all treated patients. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnorexiaAnxietyChillsDepressionDiarrheaDizzinessDry MouthFatigueFeverGastroesophageal reflux diseaseHeadacheMyalgiaNauseaRash maculo-papularVomiting
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)112121122121221

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Descriptive statistics (point and exact 90% confidence interval estimates from the resultant Kaplan-Meier curve) will be generated for OS. The median OS will be estimated on an intention-to-treat basis (using all registered patients), and on a response-evaluable basis (using all patients who completed all BAT infusions) using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)0.934

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Descriptive statistics (point and exact 90% confidence interval estimates from the resultant Kaplan-Meier curve) will be generated for PFS. The median PFS will be estimated on an intention-to-treat basis (using all registered patients), and on a response-evaluable basis (using all patients who completed all BAT infusions) using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

InterventionYears (Median)
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)0.934

[back to top]

Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital signs assessment included Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and Pulse Rate (PR). Number of Participants with any potentially clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Increased in Systolic blood pressureDecreased in Systolic blood pressureIncreased in Diastolic blood pressureDecreased in Diastolic blood pressureIncreased in pulse rateDecreased in pulse rate
Avelumab626924264830
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)574314214632

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Composite Index Score up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall composite health state index score, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3/4, Week 7, Week 13, Week 19, Week 25, Week 31, Week 37, Week 43, Week 49, Week 55, Week 61, Week 67, End of Treatment ( EOT up to 148 weeks) and Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

,
InterventionUnits on Scale (Mean)
Week 3/4Week 7Week 13Week 19Week 25Week 31Week 37Week 43Week 49Week 55Week 61Week 67End Of TreatmentSafety Follow-Up
Avelumab0.004-0.009-0.017-0.0110.0140.0130.0130.0580.0260.0280.0310.039-0.138-0.099
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)-0.002-0.032-0.053-0.039-0.049-0.023-0.035-0.046-0.100-0.164-0.091-0.076-0.125-0.062

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (EORTC QLQ-STO22 ) Questionnaire Scores up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (EORTC QLQ-STO22 ) supplements the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, pain, reflux symptom, dietary restrictions, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3/4, Week 7, Week 13, Week 19, Week 25, Week 31, Week 37, Week 43, Week 49, Week 55, Week 61, Week 67, End of Treatment ( EOT up to 148 weeks) and Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dysphagia: Week 3/4Dysphagia Week 7Dysphagia Week 13Dysphagia Week 19Dysphagia Week 25Dysphagia Week 31Dysphagia Week 37Dysphagia Week 43Dysphagia Week 49Dysphagia Week 55Dysphagia Week 61Dysphagia Week 67Dysphagia End Of TreatmentDysphagia Safety Follow-UpPain Week 3/4Pain Week 7Pain Week 13Pain Week 19Pain Week 25Pain Week 31Pain Week 37Pain Week 43Pain Week 49Pain Week 55Pain Week 61Pain Week 67Pain End Of TreatmentPain Safety Follow-UpReflux Week 3/4Reflux Week 7Reflux Week 13Reflux Week 19Reflux Week 25Reflux Week 31Reflux Week 37Reflux Week 43Reflux Week 49Reflux Week 55Reflux Week 61Reflux Week 67Reflux End of TreatmentReflux Safety Follow-upEating Restrictions Week 3/4Eating Restrictions Week 7Eating Restrictions Week 13Eating Restrictions Week 19Eating Restrictions Week 25Eating Restrictions Week 31Eating Restrictions Week 37Eating Restrictions Week 43Eating Restrictions Week 49Eating Restrictions Week 55Eating Restrictions Week 61Eating Restrictions Week 67Eating Restrictions EOTEating Restrictions Safety Follow-upAnxiety Week 3/4Anxiety Week 7Anxiety Week 13Anxiety Week 19Anxiety Week 25Anxiety Week 31Anxiety Week 37Anxiety Week 43Anxiety Week 49Anxiety Week 55Anxiety Week 61Anxiety Week 67Anxiety End of TreatmentAnxiety Safety Follow-Up
Avelumab0.601.340.651.521.694.39-0.67-2.591.230.891.061.318.217.25-0.042.600.16-0.51-1.550.97-1.26-1.94-0.62-1.00-1.59-0.499.4510.990.120.50-1.09-1.681.69-1.29-4.38-5.56-2.06-3.56-6.350.004.732.900.13-0.270.00-0.63-1.550.39-3.28-3.89-5.25-6.00-5.56-2.4510.0111.59-4.06-1.20-2.83-1.68-1.69-0.52-1.01-1.11-6.17-4.00-4.76-1.965.894.99
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)0.762.841.60-0.58-1.390.82-7.19-4.76-3.030.000.00-1.857.279.391.512.532.963.22-1.564.01-4.901.791.520.003.330.009.258.221.040.310.991.750.69-2.06-6.54-3.171.012.226.677.413.431.560.730.981.02-2.34-2.08-2.47-8.82-4.760.763.330.001.398.277.04-0.28-1.30-0.86-1.56-2.784.12-3.92-3.970.002.22-4.449.264.585.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Scale Score up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. It consisted of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial impact. The EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score ranges from 0 to 100; High score indicates better GHS/QoL. Score 0 represents: very poor physical condition and QoL. Score 100 represents: excellent overall physical condition and QoL. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3/4, Week 7, Week 13, Week 19, Week 25, Week 31, Week 37, Week 43, Week 49, Week 55, Week 61, Week 67, End of Treatment ( EOT up to 148 weeks) and Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3/4Week 7Week 13Week 19Week 25Week 31Week 37Week 43Week 49Week 55Week 61Week 67End Of TreatmentSafety Follow-Up
Avelumab0.85-1.010.241.370.411.851.773.334.014.002.384.90-11.67-9.29
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)1.30-1.44-2.50-5.85-4.43-3.09-1.39-1.191.520.00-5.000.00-11.54-7.51

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

The PFS time was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first). PFS was assessed as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as per IRC. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)4.4
Avelumab3.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who were still alive at the time of data analysis or who were lost to follow-up, OS time was censored at the date of last contact. OS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)10.9
Avelumab10.4

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment

The ORR defined as the percentage of all randomized participants with a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of partial response (PR),or complete response (CR) according to RECIST v1.1 and as per Investigator assessment. CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)14.4
Avelumab13.3

[back to top]

Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score to 1 or Higher Than 1

ECOG PS score is widely used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participants' disease is progressing, and is used to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The score ranges from Grade 0 to Grade 5, where Grade 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, Grade 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (like light house work, office work), Grade 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, Grade 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and Grade 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair, Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with shift in ECOG PS Score to 1 or Higher Than 1 were reported. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)140
Avelumab144

[back to top]

Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEsAny Serious TEAE
Avelumab22389
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)21475

[back to top]

Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

ECG parameters included heart rate, pulse rate intervals, QRS interval, QT interval corrected based on Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals and QTcB intervals. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities were reported. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From randomization into maintenance phase up to 1276 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decreased heart rateIncreased heart rateIncreased Pulse Rate intervalIncreased QRS intervalQTcF interval greater than (>)450milisecond (ms)less than or equal to(<=)480msQTcF interval: > 480 ms <= 500 msQTcF interval: > 500 msQTcB Interval: > 450 msec <= 480 msecQTcB Interval: > 480 msec <= 500 msecQTcB Interval: > 500 msec
Avelumab12389311823
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)02159231925

[back to top]

Maintenance Phase: Number of Participants With Grade Change From Baseline to Worst On-Treatment Grade 4 Hematology Values

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, white blood cells, platelet count, lipase, serum amylase, creatinine phosphokinase and creatinine. The hematology parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. An increase is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case (Grade 4) post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with increase to grade 4 have been presented. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 1276 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
lymphocyte count decreasedneutrophil count decreasedwhite blood cells decreasedplatelet count decreasedlipase increasedserum amylase increasedcreatinine phosphokinase increasedcreatinine increased
Avelumab11008221
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)06216300

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Visual Analogue Scale up to Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. (NCT02625610)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3/4, Week 7, Week 13, Week 19, Week 25, Week 31, Week 37, Week 43, Week 49, Week 55, Week 61, Week 67, End of Treatment ( EOT up to 148 weeks) and Safety Follow-up (Up to 152.3 Weeks)

,
InterventionMillimeter (Mean)
Week 3/4Week 7Week 13Week 19Week 25Week 31Week 37Week 43Week 49Week 55Week 61Week 67End Of TreatmentSafety Follow-Up
Avelumab0.6-2.1-0.7-0.1-1.41.40.93.22.13.43.54.9-10.3-9.6
Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)0.9-0.5-3.2-3.5-4.5-2.3-1.7-4.4-2.9-9.4-6.4-7.3-12.2-8.0

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"Criteria for complete clinical response:~No residual gross tumor at procto/sigmoidoscopy, or only erythematous scar or ulcer~No radiographic evidence of tumor on DRE~Substantial downsizing on MRI~No suspicious mesorectal lymph nodes on MRI~Negative biopsy from scar, ulcer, or former tumor site (if necessary according to surgeon's judgment)~Criteria for no significant clinical response:~Residual disease by DRE, endoscopy or MR.~Increase in primary tumor size upon clinical exam or imaging~Any new lesions" (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Radiation/Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU12

[back to top]

Number of Any Grade 3 or Higher Toxicities

-The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for all toxicity reporting. (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: From start of radiation treatment through 30 days after completion of treatment (approximately 18 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaFebrile neutropeniaCardiac arrestMyocardial infarctionVentricular fibrillationAbdominal painDiarrheaPancreatitisFeverCholectystitisLung infectionFallActivated partial thromboplastin time prolongedAspartate aminotransferase increasedCardiac troponin I increasedCardiac troponin T increasedLymphocyte count decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedWhite blood cell decreasedDehydrationHyperglycemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaGeneralized muscle weaknessPeripheral sensory neuropathySyncopeRespiratory failureAspirationDyspneaHypoxiaPalmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndromeCellulitisHypertensionHypotensionThromboembolic event
Arm 1: Radiation/Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU22111131111111113522122121112111121

[back to top]

Number of Post Chemotherapy Grade 3 or Higher Toxicities

-The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for all toxicity reporting. (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: Post-chemotherapy through 1 year follow-up (approximately 1 year and 4 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaFebrile neutropeniaCardiac arrestMyocardial infarctionVentricular fibrillationAbdominal painDiarrheaFeverCholecystitisLung infectionActivated partial thromboplastin time prolongedAspartate aminotransferase increasedCardiac troponin I increasedCardiac troponin T increasedLymphocyte count decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedWhite blood cell count decreasedDehydrationHyperglycemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaGeneralized muscle weaknessPeripheral sensory neuropathySyncopeRespiratory failureAspirationDyspneaHypoxiaCellulitisHypotensionThromboembolic event
Arm 1: Radiation/Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-FU2211113211111135211221211111111

[back to top]

Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire is broken down into physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. The answers range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: 10-14 months after chemoradiation (approximately 16-20 months)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have a lack of energyI have nauseaBecause of my physical condition, I have trouble meeting the needs of my familyI have painI am bothered by side effects of treatmentI feel illI am forced to spend time in bedI feel close to my friendsI get emotional support from my familyI get support from my friendsMy family has accepted my illnessI am satisfied with family communication about my illnessI feel close to my partner (or the person who is my main support)I am satisfied with my sex lifeI feel sadI am satisfied with how I am coping with my illnessI am losing hope in the fight against my illnessI feel nervousI worry about dyingI worry that my condition will get worseI am able to work (include work at home)My work (include work at home) is fulfillingI am able to enjoy lifeI have accepted my illnessI am sleeping wellI am enjoying the things I usually do for funI am content with the quality of my life right nowI have swelling or cramps in my stomach areaI am losing weightI have control of my bowelsI can digest my food wellI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)I have a good appetiteI like the appearance of my bodyI am embarrassed by my ostomy applianceCaring for my ostomy appliance is difficult
0=Not at All41710951514000000593156105110010012152061311
1=A Little Bit504522200000006016572010145122160202
2=Somewhat514361121221223414253655445207523810
3=Quite a Bit400030142221120401113255563205224200
4=Very Much00012001215131415154071100997763411210210310
Prefer Not to Answer/No Answer/No00000000010105000000000111100000001515

[back to top]

Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire is broken down into physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. The answers range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have a lack of energyI have nauseaBecause of my physical condition, I have trouble meeting the needs of my familyI have painI am bothered by side effects of treatmentI feel illI am forced to spend time in bedI feel close to my friendsI get emotional support from my familyI get support from my friendsMy family has accepted my illnessI am satisfied with family communication about my illnessI feel close to my partner (or the person who is my main support)I am satisfied with my sex lifeI feel sadI am satisfied with how I am coping with my illnessI am losing hope in the fight against my illnessI feel nervousI worry about dyingI worry that my condition will get worseI am able to work (include work at home)My work (include work at home) is fulfillingI am able to enjoy lifeI have accepted my illnessI am sleeping wellI am enjoying the things I usually do for funI am content with the quality of my life right nowI have swelling or cramps in my stomach areaI am losing weightI have control of my bowelsI can digest my food wellI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)I have a good appetiteI like the appearance of my bodyI am embarrassed by my ostomy applianceCaring for my ostomy appliance is difficult
0=Not at All9191711191917000000082196122000020014101091000
1=A Little Bit302600100000018214491000001550050200
2=Somewhat611201110000164404253522646025240400
3=Quite a Bit200100010121010504244336676033406800
4=Very Much0000000182019181919807020012111512697101113213600
Prefer Not to Answer/No Answer/No00001010000004000000010000000010002020

[back to top]

Prospective Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire is broken down into physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. The answers range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: Completion of chemoradiation (approximately 112 days)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have a lack of energyI have nauseaBecause of my physical condition, I have trouble meeting the needs of my familyI have painI am bothered by side effects of treatmentI feel illI am forced to spend time in bedI feel close to my friendsI get emotional support from my familyI get support from my friendsMy family has accepted my illnessI am satisfied with family communication about my illnessI feel close to my partner (or the person who is my main support)I am satisfied with my sex lifeI feel sadI am satisfied with how I am coping with my illnessI am losing hope in the fight against my illnessI feel nervousI worry about dyingI worry that my condition will get worseI am able to work (include work at home)My work (include work at home) is fulfillingI am able to enjoy lifeI have accepted my illnessI am sleeping wellI am enjoying the things I usually do for funI am content with the quality of my life right nowI have swelling or cramps in my stomach areaI am losing weightI have control of my bowelsI can digest my food wellI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)I have a good appetiteI like the appearance of my bodyI am embarrassed by my ostomy applianceCaring for my ostomy appliance is difficult
0=Not at All316811616130011101103165124100100013111041211
1=A Little Bit338372611000015011161144222324642101300
2=Somewhat1102430011112283423033531346116325800
3=Quite a Bit200020032132011800113276665104327300
4=Very Much0010100141516141417504000088797660041014300
Prefer Not to Answer/No Answer/No00010100000003000000000010001010101818

[back to top]

Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire has 2 statements about anorectal function and the participant answers 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: 10-14 months after chemoradiation (approximately 16-20 months)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have control of my bowelsI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)
0=Not at All26
1=A Little Bit26
2=Somewhat72
3=Quite a Bit52
4=Very Much22

[back to top]

Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire has 2 statements about anorectal function and the participant answers 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have control of my bowelsI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)
0=Not at All19
1=A Little Bit05
2=Somewhat54
3=Quite a Bit30
4=Very Much112

[back to top]

Quality of Anorectal Function as Measured by the FACT-C Questionnaire

-The FACT-C questionnaire has 2 statements about anorectal function and the participant answers 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (NCT02641691)
Timeframe: Completion of chemoradiation (approximately 112 days)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
I have control of my bowelsI have diarrhea (diarrhoea)
0=Not at All14
1=A Little Bit410
2=Somewhat62
3=Quite a Bit42
4=Very Much41

[back to top]

Pathological Complete Response (PathCR) Rate

Defined as number of patients with pathologic complete responses (pCR) divided by total evaluable patients. pCR is defined as no recognized cancer and margins free of tumor as found by the pathologist following resection of the esophageal specimen and accompanying lymph nodes. (NCT02730546)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Pembrolizumab, Chemotherapy, Radiation, Surgery)22.6

[back to top]

Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)

Proportion of KMT2A-Rearranged patients treated with azacitidine with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first course of azacitidine administration up to fourth course of azacitidine administration. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
KMT2A-Rearranged6.45

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 5 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged74.52

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 1 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged78.17

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 5 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged75.54

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 1 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged76.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"OS: time to death by any cause from randomized treatment arm assignment.~The log-rank test with stratification was used by prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Distributions of overall survival in arms 1 and 2 were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier." (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)5.4
Arm II (FOLFIRI)6.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive without report of progression are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)2.1
Arm II (FOLFIRI)2.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed and unconfirmed, partial, complete or stable response to therapy. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)0.32
Arm II (FOLFIRI)0.47

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate, ORR

Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed and unconfirmed, partial or complete response to therapy. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)0.09
Arm II (FOLFIRI)0.10

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

"DoR: time from date of first documentation of response (complete response, CR, or partial response, PR) to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause among participants, who achieve a response (CR or PR).~The distribution of DoR in each treatment arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)3.4
Arm II (FOLFIRI)5.1

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life as Defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30

Change in quality of life over the six measurement times will be modeled using mixed effects linear regression to account for correlation among repeated measurements from the same subjects. Average change in QoL from baseline to follow-up will be computed. (NCT02896907)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 28 days after the last treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, Ascorbic Acid)NA

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm16.8-1.4-0.9-0.7-1.8-1.6-1.9-0.5-2.1-2.60.5-4.5-4.5-8.0-3.1-4.2

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm66.5-0.91.94.25.65.12.93.62.0-4.0-8.1-0.1-0.6-4.1-0.44.23.31.7-3.3-5.52.0-5.0-5.0-5.0-8.0-5.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm69.00.81.43.04.03.31.31.44.10.30.20.2-4.0-3.0-4.0-3.4-10.4-18.37.08.08.08.0-8.5-11.1

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm68.3-2.1-2.4-1.4-0.42.5-3.62.4-2.8-8.1-1.84.01.5-2.0-12.7-11.0

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm60.7-4.33.83.54.24.35.64.34.2-5.6-2.83.9-4.6-3.2-6.02.8-5.6-2.8-8.3-8.3-8-16.7-16.70.0-13.1-10.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm62.8-2.4-1.60.70.2-1.1-4.0-2.5-2.6-5.8-3.3-5.20.00.0-1.23.6-16.7-27.8-16.70.0-250.0-14.1-17.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm62.8-3.4-1.9-0.21.4-2.2-4.51.70.0-4.82.133.34.20.0-15.5-24.6

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm8
Phase 3: Doublet Arm8
Phase 3: Control Arm5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in1.45

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in1.45

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in8.08

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in5.59

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Safety Lead-in52.8

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Safety Lead-in41.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.30
Phase 3:Control Arm1.51

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.47
Phase 3:Control Arm1.58

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.30
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.21

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.47
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.27

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm1.45

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm2.63

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.43
Phase 3:Control Arm1.45

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.43
Phase 3:Doublet Arm1.48

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3:Control Arm3.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1 of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 millimeter [mm] short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3:Control Arm1.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm9.40
Phase 3:Control Arm5.88

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 89.1 weeks for triplet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.82
Phase 3: Doublet Arm9.40

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib19.0

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm3.90.0-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.7-0.8-1.1-1.0-1.0-0.30.0-0.5-1.00.40.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib0.0154

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm15.9
Phase 3:Control Arm3.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm20.4
Phase 3:Control Arm1.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Doublet Arm5.70

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Doublet Arm6.06

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Control Arm5.75

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib16.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Final Analysis

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.82
Phase 3:Control Arm5.88

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm5.70
Phase 3:Control Arm5.75

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Interim Analysis

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.1 weeks for triplet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.03
Phase 3: Control Arm5.42

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in8.15

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in6.47

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm16.3-0.2-0.3-0.20.40.70.70.50.9-1.9-1.7-1.5-1.5-2.0-2.4-2.3-4.2-6.7-5.0-7.0-6.0-9.0-2.4-3.5

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm16.2-0.9-0.6-0.2-0.1-0.20.6-0.10.2-0.8-1.3-0.5-1.1-3.2-4.0-1.5-0.7-0.7-3.0-6.0-5.0-5.0-12.0-9.0-2.2-0.8

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm3.8-0.1-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.9-0.8-1.1-1.2-0.8-0.5-0.9-0.9-1.3-1.1-1.2-2.0-1.3-2.0-3.0-3.0-3.00.3-0.1

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm3.80.1-0.8-1.2-1.1-1.1-1.2-1.0-1.1-0.9-0.6-1.1-0.8-0.9-1.5-1.6-0.7-1.0-1.0-0.5-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.00.10.5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in841000970000

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm6.06
Phase 3:Control ArmNA

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in20670.0

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Interim Analysis

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants with dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in26

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants reporting AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in37

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in (CSLI)5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in19601540

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in654524

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in195000199000

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in33602490

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in59.920.5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in1.981.04

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in3.773.05

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in2.002.00

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in2.001.58

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in113006660

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to more than or equal to (>=) Grade 3 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time - HyperHemoglobin - HyperHemoglobin - HypoLeukocytes - HyperLeukocytes - HypoLymphocytes - HyperLymphocytes - HypoNeutrophils - HypoPlatelets - HypoProthrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Hyper
Phase 3: Doublet Arm903009347852
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9097021225413
Phase 3:Control Arm40170514576542

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine Aminotransferase - HyperAlbumin - HypoAlkaline Phosphatase - HyperAspartate Aminotransferase - HyperBilirubin - HyperCalcium - HyperCalcium - HypoCreatine Kinase - HyperCreatinine - HyperGlucose - HyperGlucose - HypoMagnesium - HyperMagnesium - HypoPotassium - HyperPotassium - HypoSodium - HyperSodium - HypoTroponin I - HyperUrate - Hyper
Phase 3: Control Arm10171891207364129592501
Phase 3: Doublet Arm7161271308111160141071402
Phase 3: Triplet Arm115013111111518458401114511004

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: heart rate- decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50 and increase from baseline > 25% and to a value > 100. QT interval- new > 450 (millisecond) msec, new > 480 msec, new > 500 msec, increase from baseline > 30 msec and increase from baseline > 60 msec. QTcF- new > 450 msec, new > 480 msec, new > 500 msec, increase from baseline > 30 msec and increase from baseline > 60 msec. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate - Decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50Heart Rate - Increase from baseline > 25% and to a value > 100QT Interval - New > 450 millisecond (msec)QT Interval - New > 480 msecQT Interval - New > 500 msecQT Interval - increase from baseline > 30 msecQT Interval - increase from baseline > 60 msecQTcF - New > 450 msecQTcF - New > 480 msecQTcF - New > 500 msecQTcF - increase from baseline > 30 msecQTcF - increase from baseline > 60 msec
Phase 3: Control Arm02872032102352245
Phase 3: Doublet Arm42430759921511867520
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1271743972239915912

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities

Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: low/high systolic blood pressure (SBP): <= 90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with decrease from baseline of >= 20mmHg or >= 160mmHg with increase from baseline of >= 20mmHg, low or high diastolic blood pressure (DBP): <= 50mmHg with decrease from baseline of >= 15mmHg or >= 100mmHg with increase from baseline of >= 15mmHg, low or high pulse: <= 50 beats/min with decrease from baseline of >= 15 beats/min or >= 120 beats/min with increase from baseline of >= 15 beats/min, low or high temperature: <= 36 degree Celsius (deg C) or >= 37.5 deg C. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Diastolic Blood Pressure - HighDiastolic Blood Pressure - LowPulse Rate - HighPulse Rate - LowSystolic Blood Pressure - HighSystolic Blood Pressure - LowTemperature - HighTemperature - Low
Phase 3: Control Arm752035102555
Phase 3: Doublet Arm62714413282384
Phase 3: Triplet Arm82123319373393

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift in Visual Acuity Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Score

Visual acuity was measured using the Snellen visual acuity conversion chart. This was determined by establishing the smallest optotypes that could be identified correctly by the participant at a given observation distance. Snellen visual acuity was reported as a Snellen fraction (m/M) in which the numerator (m) indicated the test distance and the denominator (M) indicated the distance at which the gap of the equivalent Landolt ring subtends 1 minute of arc. The LogMAR score was calculated as - log(m/M). The maximum increase in score of <= 0, 0 to < 0.1, 0.1 to < 0.2, 0.2 to < 0.3 and >=0.3 relative to baseline in LogMAR were reported in this endpoint. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline <=0 to >0-<0.1Baseline <=0 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline <=0 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline <=0 to >=0.3Baseline <=0 to missing scoreBaseline >0-<0.1 to <=0Baseline >0-<0.1 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline >0-<0.1 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline >0-<0.1 to >=0.3Baseline >0-<0.1 to missing scoreBaseline 0.1-<0.2 to <=0Baseline 0.1-<0.2 to >0-<0.1Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to <=0Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to >0-<0.1Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to missing scoreBaseline >=0.3 to <=0Baseline >=0.3 to >0-<0.1Baseline >=0.3 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline >=0.3 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline >=0.3 to missing scoreBaseline 0.1-<0.2 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline 0.1-<0.2 to missing score
Phase 3: Control Arm000012900003000000500001307
Phase 3: Doublet Arm83018662102510001420101939
Phase 3: Triplet Arm33154691774335113319412100

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shifts in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline to Maximum Grade On-treatment

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) abnormalities were defined according to CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 0: Non-missing value below Grade 2, Grade 2: LVEF between 40% and 50% or absolute change from baseline between -10% and < -20%, Grade 3: LVEF between 20% and 39% or absolute change from baseline <= -20%, Grade 4: LVEF lower than 20%. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values showing any shift in Grade from baseline to 1 day after dose 1 (post-baseline) were reported. Participants whose grade category was unchanged (e.g. Grade 0 to Grade 0) were not reported. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Grade 0 to Grade 2 post baselineBaseline Grade 0 to Grade 3 post baselineBaseline Grade 0 to missing gradeBaseline Grade 2 to missing gradeBaseline missing grade to Grade 0 post baseline
Phase 3: Control Arm0018620
Phase 3: Doublet Arm0120530
Phase 3: Triplet Arm2711701

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Control ArmNA

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Doublet Arm1.48

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3: Doublet Arm20.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3: Doublet Arm15.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.21
Phase 3:Control Arm1.51

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.27
Phase 3:Control Arm1.58

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm2.63

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Final Analysis

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants according to incidence of dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose interruptionsDose modificationsDiscontinuation due to AEs
Combined Safety Lead-in30168

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants44869.1

[back to top]

AUC (0-24) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants6930.8

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to t (AUC[0-t]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants59013.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Blood pressure of participants were measured at indicated time points in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Day 1 (Pre-dose) value was defined as Baseline for vital sign parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 336 and 504 hours

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
DBP, 4 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 12 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 24 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 48 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 72 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 96 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 120 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 144 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 168 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 336 hours, n=7, 7DBP, 504 hours, n=7, 6SBP, 4 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 12 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 24 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 48 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 72 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 96 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 120 hours, n=7, 7SBP,144 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 168 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 336 hours, n=7, 7SBP, 504 hours, n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-0.7-0.3-2.92.0-4.6-2.7-3.4-5.4-1.0-5.3-0.71.31.0-3.4-1.1-4.62.60.9-3.30.9-2.6-1.5
Healthy Japanese Participants-7.0-5.4-3.9-3.4-4.0-5.9-4.1-7.6-5.1-5.7-7.3-0.11.4-1.0-1.9-1.0-1.4-6.3-6.60.4-3.9-5.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants64670.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 (AUC[0-24]) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants8756.3

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution Following Oral Dosing (Vd/F) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionMilliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants135330.9

[back to top]

Apparent Clearance Following Oral Dosing (CL/F) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionMilliliter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants773.2

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) at Indicated Time Points

Urine samples were collected for analysis of urine pH. pH is calculated on a scale of 0 to 14, values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Day -1, 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionpH (Mean)
Day -1, n=7, 724 hours, n=7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n=7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants6.865.796.076.076.006.08
Healthy Japanese Participants6.215.865.795.936.006.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including mean corpuscular hemoglobin at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionPicogram (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.00.0-0.1-0.3-0.2
Healthy Japanese Participants0.0-0.40.00.10.0

[back to top]

Specific Gravity at Indicated Time Points

Urine samples were collected for analysis of specific gravity of urine. Urinary specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine. It measures the ratio of urine density compared with water density and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Day -1, 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day -1, n=7, 724 hours, n=7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n=7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants1.01771.02561.02361.02071.02461.0222
Healthy Japanese Participants1.01271.02141.02111.02111.01931.0183

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. All participants who take at least one dose of study treatment were included in Safety Population. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Up to Day 23

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsAny SAEs
Healthy Caucasian Participants60
Healthy Japanese Participants20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameter

The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters of can be read as Trace, + and ++ indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Only participants with abnormal findings for urinalysis at any visit has been presented. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Day -1, 24, 96, 168, 336 and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketones, 336 hours, ++Ketones, 336 hours, traceKetones, follow up (504 hours), +Occult blood, 336 hours, +Occult blood, follow up, traceProtein, Day -1, traceProtein, 24 hours, traceProtein, 96 hours, traceProtein, 168 hours, traceProtein, 336 hours, trace
Healthy Caucasian Participants0100113413
Healthy Japanese Participants2011002223

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate by Fredericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

A single 12-lead ECG was obtained at indicated time points using an ECG machine that automatically measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTcF intervals. Day 1 (Pre-dose) value was defined as Baseline for ECG parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 48, and 504 hours

,
InterventionMillisecond (Mean)
PR Interval, 4 hours, n=7, 7PR Interval, 12 hours, n=7, 7PR Interval, 24 hours, n=7, 7PR Interval, 48 hours, n=7, 7PR Interval, 504 hours, n=7, 6QRS duration, 4 hours, n=7, 7QRS duration, 12 hours, n=7, 7QRS duration, 24 hours, n=7, 7QRS duration, 48 hours, n=7, 7QRS duration, 504 hours, n=7, 6QT interval, 4 hours, n=7, 7QT interval, 12 hours, n=7, 7QT interval, 24 hours, n=7, 7QT interval, 48 hours, n=7, 7QT interval, 504 hours, n=7, 6QTcF interval, 4 hours, n=7, 7QTcF interval, 12 hours, n=7, 7QTcF interval, 24 hours, n=7, 7QTcF interval, 48 hours, n=7, 7QTcF interval, 504 hours, n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-4.6-5.9-0.10.32.2-2.1-0.6-2.00.4-0.8-20.4-21.7-7.3-14.7-9.2-6.6-5.7-0.1-2.9-2.2
Healthy Japanese Participants-5.3-8.7-3.1-17.0-7.3-1.6-0.30.33.1-0.3-4.0-17.94.32.314.7-4.9-7.7-0.911.66.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of ECG Parameter: ECG Mean Heart Rate

A single 12-lead ECG was obtained at indicated time points using an ECG machine that automatically calculates mean ECG heart rate. Day 1 (Pre-dose) value was defined as Baseline for ECG parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 48, and 504 hours

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
4 hours, n=7, 712 hours, n=7, 724 hours, n=7, 748 hours, n=7, 7504 hours, n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants6.07.13.15.03.2
Healthy Japanese Participants-2.32.3-5.36.7-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter including protein at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionGram per liter (Mean)
24 hours, n=7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n=7, 7Follow-up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-2.3-2.9-4.1-2.4-4.2
Healthy Japanese Participants-4.9-4.6-3.6-4.4-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Sodium, Calcium, Potassium, and Urea.

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including glucose, sodium, calcium, potassium, and urea at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Glucose, 24 hours, n=7, 7Glucose, 96 hours, n=7, 7Glucose, 168 hours, n=7, 7Category title 4. : Glucose, 336 hours, n=7, 7Glucose, Follow-up (504 hours), n= 7, 6Calcium, 24 hours, n=7, 7Calcium, 96 hours, n=7, 7Calcium, 168 hours, n=7, 7Calcium, 336 hours, n=7, 7Calcium, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Potassium, 24 hours, n=7, 7Potassium, 96 hours, n=7, 7Potassium, 168 hours, n=7, 7Potassium, 336 hours, n=7, 7Potassium, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Sodium, 24 hours, n=7, 7Sodium, 96 hours, n=7, 7Sodium, 168 hours, n=7, 7Sodium, 336 hours, n=7, 7Sodium, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Urea, 24 hours, n=7, 7Urea, 96 hours, n=7, 7Urea, 168 hours, n=7, 7Urea, 336 hours, n=7, 7Urea, Follow up,(504 hours) n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-0.26-0.10-0.37-0.090.00-0.054-0.033-0.033-0.040-0.0420.00-0.11-0.21-0.21-0.220.01.01.7-0.3-0.51.01-0.03-0.261.061.27
Healthy Japanese Participants-0.33-0.43-0.60-0.43-0.24-0.116-0.006-0.006-0.083-0.100-0.030.000.01-0.100.09-0.3-0.6-1.30.3-0.10.330.260.41-0.160.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine.

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including direct bilirubin, bilirubin and creatinine at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Direct bilirubin, 24 hours, n=7, 7Direct bilirubin, 96 hours, n=7, 7Direct bilirubin, 168 hours, n=7, 7Direct bilirubin, 336 hours, n=7, 7Direct bilirubin, Follow-up (504 hours), n=7, 6Bilirubin, 24 hours, n=7, 7Bilirubin, 96 hours, n=7, 7Bilirubin, 168 hours, n=7, 7Bilirubin, 336 hours, n=7, 7Bilirubin, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Creatinine, 24 hours, n=7, 7Creatinine, 96 hours, n=7, 7Creatinine, 168 hours, n=7, 7Creatinine, 336 hours, n=7, 7Creatinine, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.60.70.90.90.33.12.41.0-0.3-1.726.630.124.614.99.5
Healthy Japanese Participants0.70.40.6-0.3-0.31.4-0.60.7-4.0-3.421.724.420.914.15.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including alkaline phosphatase, ALT and AST at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Alkaline Phosphatase, 24 hours, n=7, 7Alkaline Phosphatase, 96 hours, n=7, 7Alkaline Phosphatase, 168 hours, n=7, 7Alkaline Phosphatase, 336 hours, n=7, 7Alkaline Phosphatase, Follow-up (504 hours), n=7,6ALT, 24 hours, n=7, 7ALT, 96 hours, n=7, 7ALT, 168 hours, n=7, 7ALT, 336 hours, n=7, 7ALT, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6AST, 24 hours, n=7, 7AST, 96 hours, n=7, 7AST, 168 hours, n=7, 7AST, 336 hours, n=7, 7AST, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-3.3-3.1-4.1-2.9-9.3-3.3-5.1-4.4-3.9-5.3-1.9-4.3-3.0-2.4-1.5
Healthy Japanese Participants-9.0-6.7-7.0-11.0-9.6-3.0-2.10.70.90.4-3.4-3.7-2.00.30.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature

Temperature of participants were measured at indicated time points in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Day 1 (Pre-dose) value was defined as Baseline for vital sign parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 336 and 504 hours

,
InterventionCelsius (Mean)
4 hours, n=7, 712 hours, n=7, 724 hours, n=7, 748 hours, n=7, 772 hours, n=7, 796 hours, n=7, 7120 hours, n=7, 7144 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n=7, 7504 hours, n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.270.26-0.01-0.04-0.10-0.04-0.17-0.090.01-0.13-0.07
Healthy Japanese Participants-0.010.04-0.07-0.16-0.10-0.11-0.10-0.14-0.09-0.27-0.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate of participants were measured at indicated time points in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Day 1 (Pre-dose) value was defined as Baseline for vital sign parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 336 and 504 hours

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
4 hours, n=7, 712 hours, n=7, 724 hours, n=7, 748 hours, n=7, 772 hours, n=7, 796 hours, n=7, 7120 hours, n=7, 7144 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n=7, 7504 hours, n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants4.710.1-5.0-0.3-0.30.62.0-0.17.11.62.2
Healthy Japanese Participants3.65.03.43.44.91.41.10.14.41.0-2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelet and Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters including basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelet and leukocytes at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. Data was not available as all basophil values were below the detection limit. Hence, the change from baseline in basophil values were not calculated. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Eosinophils, 24 hours, n=4, 3Eosinophils, 96 hours, n=4, 3Eosinophils, 168 hours, n=4, 3Eosinophils, 336 hours, n=3, 3Eosinophils, Follow up (504 hours), n=4, 2Lymphocytes, 24 hours, n=7, 7Lymphocytes, 96 hours, n=7, 7Lymphocytes, 168 hours, n=7, 7Lymphocytes, 336 hours, n=7, 7Lymphocytes, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Monocytes, 24 hours, n=7, 7Monocytes, 96 hours, n=7, 7Monocytes, 168 hours, n=7, 7Monocytes, 336 hours, n=7, 7Monocytes, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Neutrophils, 24 hours, n=7, 7Neutrophils, 96 hours, n=7, 7Neutrophils, 168 hours, n=7, 7Neutrophils, 336 hours, n=7, 7Neutrophils, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Platelet, 24 hours, n=7, 7Platelet, 96 hours, n=7, 7Platelet, 168 hours, n=7, 7Platelet, 336 hours, n=7, 7Platelet, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6Leukocytes, 24 hours, n=7, 7Leukocytes, 96 hours, n=7, 7Leukocytes, 168 hours, n=7, 7Leukocytes, 336 hours, n=7, 7Leukocytes, Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.070.000.000.00-0.050.360.300.260.090.000.04-0.010.000.00-0.03-0.54-0.79-0.69-0.96-0.97-11.6-6.3-13.3-27.3-24.3-0.09-0.46-0.36-0.77-0.97
Healthy Japanese Participants-0.03-0.030.000.00-0.05-0.27-0.11-0.10-0.50-0.41-0.11-0.040.01-0.09-0.06-0.63-0.76-0.61-0.93-1.09-18.3-15.1-20.0-22.4-22.9-1.00-0.89-0.67-1.50-1.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Reticulocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including reticulocytes at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionProportion of reticulocytes in blood (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.0003-0.00060.00090.00030.0017
Healthy Japanese Participants-0.00160.00170.0013-0.0011-0.0013

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including mean corpuscular volume at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants-0.7-1.4-1.1-1.9-1.7
Healthy Japanese Participants-0.60.1-0.30.40.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including hemoglobin at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionGram per liter (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants3.00.0-1.7-3.6-6.0
Healthy Japanese Participants2.02.60.0-4.9-12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including hematocrit at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.007-0.006-0.006-0.016-0.025
Healthy Japanese Participants0.0010.009-0.004-0.014-0.036

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter including erythrocytes at indicated time points. Day -1 value was defined as Baseline for hematology parameters. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between post-dose visit values minus Baseline value. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1), 24, 96, 168, 336 hours and follow up (504 hours)

,
Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
24 hours, n= 7, 796 hours, n=7, 7168 hours, n=7, 7336 hours, n= 7, 7Follow up (504 hours), n=7, 6
Healthy Caucasian Participants0.1000.006-0.021-0.079-0.183
Healthy Japanese Participants0.0260.101-0.024-0.187-0.411

[back to top]

Vd/F of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionMilliliters (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants157125.8

[back to top]

Tmax of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours (Median)
Healthy Caucasian Participants1.000

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours (Median)
Healthy Japanese Participants2.000

[back to top]

Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants122.75

[back to top]

T1/2 of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours (Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants99.46

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Japanese Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. PK Population is defined as all participants who administered at least one dose of study treatment and who have PK sample taken and analyzed. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Japanese Participants430.5

[back to top]

Cmax of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants371.1

[back to top]

CL/F of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionMilliliters per hour (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants1114.4

[back to top]

AUC (0-t) of Pyrimethamine in Healthy Caucasian Male Participants

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03258762)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22

InterventionHours* nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Healthy Caucasian Participants41582.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT03488225)
Timeframe: Start of treatment up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Hyper-CVAD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin)24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity

MRD levels continuously assessed during induction and consolidation therapy by 6-color multiparameter flow. MRD negativity defined by a value of at least 10-4 and confirmed on a second bone marrow aspiration/biopsy performed after a subsequent cycle. (NCT03488225)
Timeframe: Start of treatment up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Hyper-CVAD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin)4

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival

Event-free survival defined as the time interval from date of treatment start until the date of death, disease progression or relapse. (NCT03488225)
Timeframe: Start of treatment up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Hyper-CVAD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin)24

[back to top]

Participants to Achieve Complete Remission (CR):

Complete Remission (CR) is defined as - Normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts /= 100X10^9/L and complete resolution of all sites of extramedullary disease. (NCT03488225)
Timeframe: Start of treatment up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Hyper-CVAD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

For the purpose of toxicity monitoring, toxicities are defined as any treatment -related grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic AEs occurred any time during the trial.NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 utilized for adverse event reporting. (NCT03488225)
Timeframe: Start of treatment up to 30 days after last dose received.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Neutropenic FeverPeripheral Sensory NeuropathyAllergic ReactionMuscle Weakness
Treatment (Hyper-CVAD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin)2111

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Defined as the rate of Complete Response (CR) plus Partial Response (PR): Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox104
Folfirinox90

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of progressive disease or death from any cause.~Progressive Disease is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression." (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox7.82
Folfirinox7.98

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox11.10
Folfirinox11.73

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT03518112)
Timeframe: Time from the first day of treatment assessed up to 3 years, 1 month

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Blinatumomab, Combination Chemotherapy)16.7

[back to top]

Participants With a Response

"defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or CR with inadequate count recovery (CRi). Complete Remission (CR): Normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with 5% or less blasts in normocellular or hypercellular marrow with a granulocyte count of 1 x 10^9/L or above, and platelet count of 100 x 10^9/L. Complete resolution of all sites of extramedullary disease is required for CR.~Complete remission without recovery of counts (CRi): Peripheral blood and marrow results as for CR, but with incomplete recover of counts (platelets < 100 x 10^9/L; neutrophils < 1 x 10^9/L)." (NCT03518112)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Blinatumomab, Combination Chemotherapy)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry. MRD negativity: Absence of detectable leukemia using multiparameter flow cytometry with a sensitivity of NCT03518112)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Blinatumomab, Combination Chemotherapy)4

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) Where Events Defined as no Response, Loss of Response, or Death

"Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of disease-relapse. Relapse and resistant disease will be defined based on morphological assessment of bone marrow and peripheral blood.~Complete Remission (CR): Normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with 5% or less blasts in normocellular or hypercellular marrow with a granulocyte count of 1 x 10^9/L or above, and platelet count of 100 x 10^9/L. Complete resolution of all sites of extramedullary disease is required for CR.~Complete remission without recovery of counts (CRi): Peripheral blood and marrow results as for CR, but with incomplete recover of counts (platelets < 100 x 10^9/L; neutrophils < 1 x 10^9/L).~Partial Response (PR): As above for CR except for the presence of 6-25% marrow blasts." (NCT03518112)
Timeframe: Time from the first day of treatment assessed up to 3 years, 1 month

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Blinatumomab, Combination Chemotherapy)5.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Response date to loss of response or last follow up. Complete Remission (CR): Normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with 5% or less blasts in normocellular or hypercellular marrow with a granulocyte count of 1 x 10^9/L or above, and platelet count of 100 x 10^9/L. Complete resolution of all sites of extramedullary disease is required for CR.~Complete remission without recovery of counts (CRi): Peripheral blood and marrow results as for CR, but with incomplete recover of counts (platelets < 100 x 10^9/L; neutrophils < 1 x 10^9/L).~Partial Response (PR): As above for CR except for the presence of 6-25% marrow blasts." (NCT03518112)
Timeframe: Time from the first day of treatment assessed up to 3 years, 1 month

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Blinatumomab, Combination Chemotherapy)4.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase

Number of participants with abnormal vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate) reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 65.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PyrexiaDyspnoeaDyspnoea exertionalHypotensionTemperature intoleranceHypertension
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel310200
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX000010
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel301100
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX100101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase

Number of participants with abnormal ECG parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 65.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Atrial fibrillationTachycardiaAtrioventricular block
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel110
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase

Number of participants with abnormal ECG parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 172.1 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Supraventricular tachycardiaTachycardia
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel02
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel03
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 172.1 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnaemiaFebrile neutropeniaLeukocytosisLeukopeniaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaThrombocytosisHyperthyroidismHypothyroidismHypertransaminasaemiaAlanine aminotransferase decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAmylase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood albumin decreasedBlood alkaline phosphatase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedBlood creatinine increasedBlood glucose increasedBlood lactate dehydrogenase increasedBlood magnesium decreasedBlood oestrogen decreasedGamma-glutamyltransferase increasedHaemoglobin decreasedInternational normalised ratio increasedLipase increasedLiver function test increasedLymphocyte count decreasedNeutrophil countNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedTroponin I increasedWhite blood cell count decreasedWhite blood cell count increasedHyperglycaemiaHyperkalaemiaHypoalbuminaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypoglycaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHypophosphataemiaHypovolaemiaIron deficiencyType 2 diabetes mellitusProteinuria
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel17011222620001811113320100600014019131604132044811000
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel28313216131370016115082803008112061242001006163286300101
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel14102015700010908023020111001020890612122023000011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival Events in Dose Expansion Phase

The overall survival is defined as the time from the randomization until death due to any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of data cut off, overall survival was censored on the last date when participants were known to be alive. The overall survival is assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The number of participants with overall survival events (deaths) is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 38.7 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionParticipants with event (Number)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel47
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel32
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase

PFS: Time from randomization until first documentation of PD/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of whether participant received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to progression. PD:>=20% increase in SoD of TLs and an absolute increase of >= 5 mm of SoD/unequivocal progression of existing NTLs/appearance of new lesion. Participants who had no documented progression and were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at time of latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST v1.1 assessment. PFS is assessed by CD73 expression level either low/high at baseline using Kaplan-Meier method. CD73 low: No CD73 expression in tumor cells/<50% of tumor cells with 2+/3+ intensity. CD73 high: CD73 expression with 2+/3+ intensity in >=50% of tumor cells. Number of participants with PFS events is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionParticipants with event (Number)
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High35
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High23
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High39
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low8
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low9
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low12

[back to top]

Overall Survival by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase

The overall survival is defined as the time from the randomization until death due to any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of data cut off, overall survival was censored on the last date when participants were known to be alive. The overall survival is assessed by CD73 expression level either low or high at baseline using the Kaplan-Meier method. The CD73 low is defined as no CD73 expression in tumor cells or <50% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ intensity and CD73 high is defined as CD73 expression with 2+ or 3+ intensity in >=50% of tumor cells. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 38.7 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High9.9
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High7.9
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High12.1
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low22.2
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low16.0
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low16.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Dose Expansion Phase

The overall survival is defined as the time from the randomization until death due to any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of data cut off, overall survival was censored on the last date when participants were known to be alive. The overall survival is assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 38.7 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel10.8
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel8.9
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel12.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With DC According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase

The DC is defined as confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) (maintained for >=8 weeks). The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis <10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from date of first documentation. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of TLs to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of TLs to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SoD while on study, and no new lesions. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in SoD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of SoD, or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs, or the appearance of new lesion/s. Percentage of participants with DC is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel66.1
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel73.7
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel75.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Escalation Phase

The DC is defined as confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) (maintained for >=8 weeks). The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis <10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from date of first documentation. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of TLs to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of TLs to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SoD while on study, and no new lesions. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in SoD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of SoD, or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs, or the appearance of new lesion/s. Percentage of participants with DC is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 24.5 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel42.9
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel71.4
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX66.7
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX62.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase

The OR is defined as best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on RECIST v1.1. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis <10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The OR is assessed by cluster of differentiation 73 (CD73) expression level either low or high at baseline. The CD73 low is defined as no CD73 expression in tumor cells or <50% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ intensity and CD73 high is defined as CD73 expression with 2+ or 3+ intensity in >=50% of tumor cells. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High23.9
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High22.2
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High31.4
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low43.8
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low18.2
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low36.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive ADA to Durvalumab

Number of participants with positive ADA to durvalumab are reported. Persistent positive is defined as positive at >= 2 post-baseline assessments (with >=16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transient positive is defined as negative at last post-baseline assessment and positive at only one post-baseline assessment or at >= 2 post-baseline assessments (with <16 weeks between first and last positive). Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline ADA positive titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher level following drug administration. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 128 weeks (Pre-dose on C1D1, C2D1, C3D1, Day 1 of every 3 cycles starting with C5, through 12 weeks post last dose of durvalumab)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA positive at baselineADA positive post-baselinePersistent PositiveTransient PositiveTreatment-boosted ADA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel01100
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX00000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel00000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX02200
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel20000

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase

The DoR is defined as the time from the first documentation of an OR until the first documentation of a PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The OR is defined as best overall response of confirmed CR or PR based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis < 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in SoD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of SoD, or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs, or the appearance of new lesion/s. The DoR is assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel7.2
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel12.9
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel9.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Dose Escalation Phase

DLT: Any study drug related Grade (G)3 or higher toxicity including: any G4 immune-mediated AEs, >=G3 colitis/pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD), >=G3 nausea/vomiting/diarrhea that does not resolve to G2 or less within 3 days of maximal supportive care (MSC), G2 pneumonitis/ILD that does not resolve within 7 days of initiation of MSC, G4 anemia, G3 anemia with clinical sequelae/requires >2 units of red blood cells transfusion, G4 thrombocytopenia/neutropenia >=7 days, G3/4 thrombocytopenia with >=G3 hemorrhage, G4 febrile neutropenia (FN), G3 FN lasting >=5 days while receiving MSC, isolated G3 liver transaminase elevation (LTE)/ isolated G3 total bilirubin (TBL) that does not downgrade to G1 or less within 14 days of onset, isolated G4 LTE or TBL, elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase >3×upper limit of normal (ULN) and concurrent TBL >2×ULN without cholestasis or alternative explanations, any other toxicity judged as a DLT by Dose Escalation Committee. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 28 days after the first dose of study drugs

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel0
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel0
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX0
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival Events by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase

The overall survival is defined as the time from the randomization until death due to any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of data cut off, overall survival was censored on the last date when participants were known to be alive. The overall survival is assessed by CD73 expression level either low or high at baseline using the Kaplan-Meier method. The CD73 low is defined as no CD73 expression in tumor cells or <50% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ intensity and CD73 high is defined as CD73 expression with 2+ or 3+ intensity in >=50% of tumor cells. The number of participants with overall survival events (deaths) is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 38.7 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionParticipants with event (Number)
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High37
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High22
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High39
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low10
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low10
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until the first documentation of a PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of whether the participant received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to progression. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of sum of the diameters, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesion/s. Participants who had no documented progression and were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST v1.1 assessment. The PFS is assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The number of participants with PFS events is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionParticipants with event (Number)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel43
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel32
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs in Dose Expansion Phase

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 172.1 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEsAny TESAEs
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel6234
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel7037
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel3724

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in Dose Expansion Phase

The OR is defined as best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) and non-target lesions (NTLs), any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis < 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters (SoD) of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel29.0
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel21.1
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel32.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs in Dose Escalation Phase

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 65.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnaemiaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaHypothyroidismAlanine aminotransferase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood alkaline phosphatase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedBlood creatinine increasedBlood glucose decreasedInternational normalised ratio increasedLymphocyte count decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell count decreasedHypoalbuminaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHypophosphataemiaProteinuriaHyperthyroidismAmylase increasedGamma-glutamyltransferase increasedLipase increased
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel32203321011001000010010000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX12200000000011000000000100
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel32214310300123221322100000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX01112311000232211212001111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Oleclumab

Number of participants with positive ADA to oleclumab are reported. Persistent positive is defined as positive at >= 2 post-baseline assessments (with >=16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transient positive is defined as negative at last post-baseline assessment and positive at only one post-baseline assessment or at >= 2 post-baseline assessments (with <16 weeks between first and last positive). Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline ADA positive titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher level following drug administration. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 172.1 weeks (Pre-dose on Cycle [C] 1 Day [D] 1, C2D1, C3D1, Day 1 of every 3 cycles starting with C5, through 12 weeks post last dose of oleclumab)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA positive at baselineADA positive post-baselinePersistent PositiveTransient PositiveTreatment-boosted ADA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel01100
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX00000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel00000
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX01100
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel00000
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel01010

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival According to RECIST v1.1 by CD73 Expression at Baseline in Dose Expansion Phase

The PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the first documentation of a PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of whether the participant receives subsequent anticancer treatment prior to progression. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in SoD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of SoD, or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs, or the appearance of new lesion/s. Participants who had no documented progression and were still alive at time of analysis were censored at time of latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST v1.1 assessment. PFS is assessed by CD73 expression level either low/high at baseline using Kaplan-Meier method. CD73 low: No CD73 expression in tumor cells/<50% of tumor cells with 2+/3+ intensity. CD73 high: CD73 expression with 2+/3+ intensity in >=50% of tumor cells. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High5.6
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High5.2
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = High5.5
Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low10.5
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low7.6
Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel: CD73 Level = Low10.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Escalation Phase

The OR is defined as best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis < 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 24.5 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel0
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel14.3
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX0
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX12.5

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Oleclumab

Serum concentrations of oleclumab are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten minutes (mins) (± 5 mins) post end of infusion (EOI), approximately 1 hour (+ 15 mins) after start of infusion on C1D1, C3D1, and C5D1; and pre-dose on C3D1 and C5D1

,,,,
Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1 (EOI)C3D1 (pre-dose)C3D1 (EOI)C5D1 (pre-dose)C5D1 (EOI)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel297.6128.6NANANA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel710.2211.5870.373.19948.3
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX734.6368.91181235.71057
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel725.9226.8894.4116.4753.2
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel704.4164.8893.085.99852.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs in Dose Expansion Phase

Number of participants with abnormal vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate) reported as TEAEs are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 172.1 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypothermiaPyrexiaDyspnoeaDyspnoea exertionalHypertensionHypotensionOrthostatic hypotension
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel01571231
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel121821140
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel01261340

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab

Serum concentrations of durvalumab are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten mins (± 5 mins) post EOI, approximately 1 hour (+ 15 mins) after start of infusion on C1D1 and C5D1; and pre-dose on C2D1 and C5D1

,,,
Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1 (EOI)C2D1 (pre-dose)C5D1 (pre-dose)C5D1 (EOI)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel292.535.97NANA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel374.514.3974.52522.1
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX380.759.97175.9664.5
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel345.886.20137.9597.9

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab

Serum concentrations of durvalumab are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten mins (± 5 mins) post EOI, approximately 1 hour (+ 15 mins) after start of infusion on C1D1 and C5D1; and pre-dose on C2D1 and C5D1

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1 (EOI)C2D1 (pre-dose)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX309.050.52

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Nab-paclitaxel

Plasma concentrations of nab-paclitaxel are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten mins (± 5 mins) post EOI, approximately 30-40 mins after start of infusion on C1D1 and C4D1; and pre-dose on C4D1

,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1 (EOI)C4D1 (pre-dose)C4D1 (EOI)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel1711NANA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel2685NA1474
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel2381NA1825
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel2611NA1747
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel2711NA1445

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Gemcitabine and Metabolite 2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU)

Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and metabolite dFdU are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten mins (± 5 mins) post EOI, approximately 30-40 mins after start of infusion on C1D1 and C4D1; and pre-dose on C4D1

,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Gemcitabine C1D1 (EOI)Gemcitabine C4D1 (pre-dose)Gemcitabine C4D1 (EOI)dFdU C1D1 (EOI)dFdU C4D1 (pre-dose)dFdU C4D1 (EOI)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel3194NANA33700NANA
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel4659NA353032160434.634550
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel3301NA174829510245.123900
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel4086NA299826300177.527260
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel3315NA143132350149.921970

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) in Dose Escalation Phase

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Day 1 through 65.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEsAny TESAEs
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel74
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX30
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel76
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX84

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Oleclumab

Serum concentrations of oleclumab are reported. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Ten minutes (mins) (± 5 mins) post end of infusion (EOI), approximately 1 hour (+ 15 mins) after start of infusion on C1D1, C3D1, and C5D1; and pre-dose on C3D1 and C5D1

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1 (EOI)C3D1 (pre-dose)C3D1 (EOI)
Dose-escalation, Oleclumab 1500 mg + Durvalumab + mFOLFOX412.7134.3571.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival According to RECIST v1.1 in Dose Expansion Phase

The PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the first documentation of a PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of whether the participant received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to progression. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm of sum of the diameters, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesion/s. Participants who had no documented progression and were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST v1.1 assessment. The PFS is assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03611556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -28 to -1) through 36.1 months (maximum observed duration)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dose-expansion, Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel6.7
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel5.6
Dose-expansion, Oleclumab 3000 mg + Durvalumab + Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel7.5

[back to top]

Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) - Parent Reported Change

"The Social Responsiveness Scale - parent reported version measures social ability in children and young adults. There are 65 questions. The questions on the scale with anchors 1 (Not True) - 4 (Almost Always True). The scoring of SRS questions can range from 0-3 (with possible reverse scoring) based on scoring instructions for data analysis. The total possible score range for the SRS is 0 - 195. Analysis will be performed for mean of total score change over time.~Anchors Not True = 1 Sometimes True = 2 Often True = 3 Almost Always True = 4~Lower score indicates better performance." (NCT03771560)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Folinic Acid Open-label-7.8

[back to top]

Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) - Parent Reported Change

"Pediatric Quality of Life is reported by parent only and it assesses improvement of the child's overall quality of life through questions about physical, emotional, social and school functioning. There are 23 questions. The scoring of PedsQL questions can range from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost Always) points on a Likert scale. Questions are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0 - 100 scale for data analysis as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=23, 4=0. The total score = sum of all the questions over the number of items answered on. The total possible score range for the PedsQL is 0 - 100. Analysis will be performed for mean of total score change over time.~Scoring from 0 to 4~Never = 0, Almost Never = 1, Sometimes = 2, Often = 3, Almost Always =4~Higher score indicates better performance." (NCT03771560)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Folinic Acid Open-label-0.8

[back to top]

Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) - Teacher Reported Change

"The Aberrant Behavior Checklist - teacher reported version measures aberrant behavior in children and young adults. There are 58 questions. The scoring of ABC questions can range from 0 (not a problem) to 3 (severe) points on a likert scale. The total possible score range for the ABC is 0 - 174. Analysis will be performed for mean of total score change over time.~Scoring from 0-3~Not a problem = 0, Slightly = 1, Moderately Serious =2, Severe =3~Lower score indicates better performance." (NCT03771560)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Folinic Acid Open-label1.2

[back to top]

Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) - Parent Reported Change

"The Aberrant Behavior Checklist - parent reported version measures aberrant behavior in children and young adults. There are 58 questions.The scoring of one question can range from 0 (not a problem) to 3 (severe) points on a Likert scale. The total possible score range for the ABC is 0 - 174. Analysis will be performed for mean of total score change over time.~Scoring from 0-3~Not a problem = 0, Slightly = 1, Moderately Serious =2, Severe =3~Lower score indicates better performance." (NCT03771560)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Folinic Acid Open-label-2.4

[back to top]

Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) - Teacher Reported Change

"The Social Responsiveness Scale - teacher reported version measures social ability in children and young adults. There are 65 questions. The questions on the scale with anchors 1 (Not True) - 4 (Almost Always True). The scoring of SRS questions can range from 0-3 (with possible reverse scoring) based on scoring instructions for data analysis. The total possible score range for the SRS is 0 - 195. Analysis will be performed for mean of total score change over time.~Anchors Not True = 1 Sometimes True = 2 Often True = 3 Almost Always True = 4~Lower score indicates better performance." (NCT03771560)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Folinic Acid Open-label-0.5

[back to top]