Page last updated: 2024-12-08

eslicarbazepine acetate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

eslicarbazepine acetate : The acetate ester, with S configuration, of licarbazepine. An anticonvulsant, it is approved for use in Europe and the United States as an adjunctive therapy for epilepsy. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID179344
CHEMBL ID87992
CHEBI ID87016
SCHEMBL ID250594
MeSH IDM0374531

Synonyms (84)

Synonym
chebi:87016 ,
sep - 0002093
CHEMBL87992 ,
bia-2093
236395-14-5
ESL ,
bia 2-093, >=98% (hplc), solid
NCGC00165752-01
bia 2-093
acetic acid (s)-5-carbamoyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[b,f]azepin-10-yl ester
bdbm50240669
NCGC00165752-02
stedesa
bia-2-093
eslicarbazepine acetate
exalief
sep-0002093
erelib
zebinix
pazzul
[(5s)-11-carbamoyl-5,6-dihydrobenzo[b][1]benzazepin-5-yl] acetate
AKOS005145781
QIALRBLEEWJACW-INIZCTEOSA-N
eslicarbazapine acetate
exelief
bea68zvb2k ,
eslicarbazepine acetate [usan]
sep 0002093
unii-bea68zvb2k
HMS3263M06
aptiom
zebinix (tn)
aptiom (tn)
eslicarbazepine acetate (usan)
D09612
S4657
s-(-)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide
(s)-(-)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide
5h-dibenz9b,f)azepine-5-carboxamide, 10-(acetyloxy)-10,11-dihydro-, (10s)-
LP01102
(10s)-5-carbamoyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[b,f]azepin-10-yl acetate
eslicarbazepine acetate [vandf]
5h-dibenz(b,f)azepine-5-carboxamide, 10-(acetyloxy)-10,11-dihydro-, (10s)-
eslicarbazepine acetate [mart.]
(s)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5hdibenz( b,f)azepine-5-carboxamide
eslicarbazepine acetate [ema epar]
sep0002093
eslicarbazepine acetate [mi]
eslicarbazepine acetate [who-dd]
eslicarbazepine acetate [orange book]
SCHEMBL250594
CCG-222406
HY-B0703
tox21_501102
NCGC00261787-01
(s)-5-carbamoyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[b,f]azepin-10-yl acetate
(10s)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide
AC-31734
E1046
DTXSID90178308 ,
DB09119
eslicarbazepine (acetate) ,
J-015175
Q410273
5h-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide, 10-(acetyloxy)-10,11-dihydro-, (10s)-
mfcd06798333
bia 2093
AS-14058
5-(aminocarbonyl)-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[b,f]azepin-10-yl acetate
AR-270/43507894
SDCCGSBI-0633789.P001
NCGC00165752-06
HMS3885N14
eslicarbazepine-acetate
NCGC00165752-04
H11471
(s)-10-acetoxy- 10,11-dihydro- 5h-dibenz[b,f]azepine- 5-carboxamide
EN300-18665321
(9s)-2-carbamoyl-2-azatricyclo[9.4.0.0,3,8]pentadeca-1(11),3(8),4,6,12,14-hexaen-9-yl acetate
(10s)-5-carbamoyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo(b,f)azepin-10-yl acetate
(10s)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenz(b,f)azepine-5-carboxamide
dtxcid80100799
eslicarbazepine acetate (mart.)
(s)-10-acetoxy-10,11-dihydro-5hdibenz(b,f)azepine-5-carboxamide

Research Excerpts

Overview

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication for patients with focal-onset epilepsy. It is a novel antiepileptic drug whose effectiveness against trigeminal pain was recently demonstrated.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a third-generation anti-epileptic prodrug quickly and extensively transformed to eslicarbazepine after oral administration. "( ABCB1 C3435T, G2677T/A and C1236T variants have no effect in eslicarbazepine pharmacokinetics.
Abad-Santos, F; Del Peso-Casado, M; Enrique-Benedito, T; Mejía-Abril, G; Navares, M; Ochoa, D; Ovejero-Benito, MC; Román, M; Villapalos-García, G; Zubiaur, P, 2021
)
2.06
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a prodrug antiseizure medication for the treatment of focal seizures. "( The pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles of eslicarbazepine acetate are comparable between Korean and White subjects.
Cho, JY; Chung, JY; Hwang, I; Hwang, S; Jang, IJ; Kim, E; Lee, S; Oh, J, 2022
)
2.41
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD), oral anti-seizure medication for the treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures. "( Psychiatric adverse events in three phase III trials of eslicarbazepine acetate for focal seizures.
Altalib, H; Blum, D; Cantu, D; Grinnell, T; Ikedo, F; Vieira, M; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
2.41
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an adjunctive therapy or monotherapy for focal onset seizures. "( Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy.
Kim, DW; Kwack, DW, 2023
)
2.63
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication for patients with focal-onset epilepsy. "( A Prospective Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Treatment on Bone Density and Metabolism in Patients with Focal-Onset Epilepsy.
Hirsch, M; Immisch, I; Knake, S; Schulze-Bonhage, A, 2023
)
2.6
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as monotherapy for partial-onset seizures in adults and as adjunctive therapy in patients aged above 6 years in the European Union (EU). "( Effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate in dependency of baseline anticonvulsant therapy: Results from a German prospective multicenter clinical practice study.
Brecht, S; Kockelmann, E; Lendemans, D; Losch, F; Weissinger, F; Winter, Y, 2019
)
2.3
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug whose effectiveness against trigeminal pain was recently demonstrated. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate interacts in a beneficial manner with standard and alternative analgesics to reduce trigeminal nociception.
Micov, A; Pecikoza, U; Stepanović-Petrović, R; Tomić, M; Vuković, M, 2020
)
3.44
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) of the carboxamide family and structurally related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, although it has pharmacological differences that may have relevant implications of clinical utility. "( [The role of eslicarbazepine acetate in the treatment of focal-onset epilepsy in pediatric age: practical issues].
Aparicio, J; García-Peñas, JJ; Roldán-Aparicio, S; Smeyers-Durá, P, 2020
)
2.37
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel sodium channel blocker for use in the treatment of focal onset seizures. "( [Alzemon: a prospective follow-up study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy].
Alfaro-Sáez, A; Asensio-Asensio, M; Bertol-Alegre, V; Blanco-Cantó, ME; Castro-Vilanova, MD; Díaz-Román, M; Galiano, ML; García-Escrivá, A; Hernández-Rubio, L; López-González, F; Méndez-Miralles, MA; Montoya, J; Tortosa-Conesa, D, 2021
)
2.33
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiseizure medication (ASM) that is approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. "( Predictors of seizure freedom, response and retention after 12 months of treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate: A post-hoc analysis of the Euro-Esli study.
Delanty, N; Fernandes, H; Holtkamp, M; Loureiro, R; McMurray, R; Mecarelli, O; Sales, F; Villanueva, V, 2021
)
2.29
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is an anticonvulsant drug approved for the treatment of focal epilepsies, and related to oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine (CBZ), which are also derivatives of the dibenzazepine family. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate as a therapeutic option in a patient with carbamazepine-induced rash and HLA-A*31:01.
Kay, L; Klein, KM; Reif, PS; Rosenow, F; Strzelczyk, A; Willems, LM; Zöllner, JP, 2017
)
3.34
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new anti-epileptic drug belonging to the dibenzazepine carboxamide family that is currently approved as adjunctive therapy and monotherapy for partial-onset (focal) seizures. "( Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures.
Galiana, GL; Gauthier, AC; Mattson, RH, 2017
)
3.34
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug specifically designed with the objective to identify carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine analogues with favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles."( Effects of eslicarbazepine acetate on lipid profile and sodium levels in patients with epilepsy.
Brienza, M; Davassi, C; Franco, V; Mecarelli, O; Pulitano, P; Russo, E, 2017
)
1.57
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive treatment in adults, children, and adolescents with focal-onset seizures. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate in epilepsies with focal and secondary generalised seizures: systematic review of current evidence.
Paule, E; Rosenow, F; Schubert-Bast, S; Strzelczyk, A; Willems, LM; Zöllner, JP, 2018
)
3.37
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that has not previously been evaluated for the treatment of TN."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
1.48
"Eslicarbazepine acetate has shown to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated drug for TN. "( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
2.2
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel once-daily antiepileptic drug and a third-generation single enantiomer member of the dibenzazepine family."( Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients with Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Brigo, F; Cagnetti, C; Grillo, E; Lattanzi, S; Silvestrini, M; Verrotti, A; Zaccara, G, 2018
)
1.59
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for partial-onset seizures (POS). "( Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Efficacy and Safety in Monotherapy of Partial-Onset Seizures.
Blum, D; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Grinnell, T; Ludwig, EA; Passarell, JA; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
2.16
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation member of the dibenzazepine family approved in 2009 by the European Medicines Agency with the indication of adjunctive therapy in adult people with partial-onset seizures (PPOS). "( The ROME (Retrospective Observational Multicenter study on Eslicarbazepine) study: Efficacy and behavioural effects of Eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial onset seizures in real life.
Assenza, F; Assenza, G; Di Lazzaro, V; Lanzone, J; Mecarelli, O; Pulitano, P; Tombini, M, 2018
)
2.13
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) for focal-onset seizures (FOS). "( Exposure-safety and efficacy response relationships and population pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Falcão, A; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Gidal, BE; Grinnell, T; Jacobson, MP; Ludwig, E; Moreira, J; Passarell, J; Rocha, F; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
2.15
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is an anticonvulsant drug with a recent U.S. "( Formulation and Stability Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Oral Suspensions for Extemporaneous Compounding.
Dave, VS; Mar, MZ; Perri, JR; Zhao, F,
)
1.85
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel dibenzazepine antiepileptic, that has demonstrated efficacy against trigeminal pain, both in preclinical and clinical studies. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate reduces trigeminal nociception: Possible role of adrenergic, cholinergic and opioid receptors.
Micov, A; Pecikoza, U; Stepanović-Petrović, R; Tomić, M, 2018
)
3.37
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed in Spain in February 2011 as an adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization."( [Eslicarbazepine acetate in clinical practice. Efficacy and safety results].
Cimadevilla, JM; Fernández-Pérez, J; Payán-Ortiz, M; Quiroga-Subirana, P; Serrano-Castro, PJ, 2013
)
2.02
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new central nervous system-active compound with anticonvulsant activity whose mechanism of action is by blocking the voltage-gated sodium channel."( Eslicarbazepine acetate: an update on efficacy and safety in epilepsy.
Loiacono, G; Rossi, A; Verrotti, A; Zaccara, G, 2014
)
2.57
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset or focal seizures."( Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal seizures: results of the 1-year ESLIBASE retrospective study.
Camacho, JL; Castillo, A; Flores, J; Garcés, M; Giner, P; Giráldez, BG; Guillamón, E; López González, FJ; López-Gomáriz, E; Mauri, JA; Molins, A; Palau, J; Rodríguez-Uranga, J; Salas-Puig, J; Serratosa, JM; Toledo, M; Torres, N; Villanueva, V, 2014
)
2.13
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new generation voltage-gated sodium channel blocker. "( Two-year follow-up with eslicarbazepine acetate: a consecutive, retrospective, observational study.
Chaves, J; Correia, FD; Freitas, J; Lopes, J; Lopes-Lima, J; Magalhães, R; Ramalheira, J, 2014
)
2.15
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is an anticonvulsant approved as an adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures."( Assessment of the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate in acute mania and prevention of recurrence: experience from multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase II clinical studies in patients with bipolar disorder I.
Almeida, L; Costa, R; Falcão, A; Grunze, H; Kotlik, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2015
)
2.13
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug registered as the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. "( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of eslicarbazepine for the treatment of epilepsy.
Banach, M; Borowicz, KK; Czuczwar, SJ, 2015
)
1.86
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug derived from carbamazepine/oxcarbazepine with a more favorable metabolic profile and potentially better tolerability."( The Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Models of Trigeminal, Neuropathic, and Visceral Pain: The Involvement of 5-HT1B/1D Serotonergic and CB1/CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors.
Micov, AM; Pecikoza, UB; Stepanović-Petrović, RM; Tomić, MA, 2015
)
1.48
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (Aptiom(®)) is a once-daily, orally administered antiepileptic drug (AED) approved previously in the EU, USA and several other countries for use as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. "( Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy: A Review in Partial-Onset Seizures.
Dhillon, S; Shirley, M, 2016
)
3.32
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third generation AED structurally related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, but without several of the drawbacks associated with these compounds. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of partial epilepsy.
Ben-Menachem, E; Zelano, J, 2016
)
3.32
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiepileptic drug for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. "( Abuse liability assessment of eslicarbazepine acetate in healthy male and female recreational sedative users: A Phase I randomized controlled trial.
Blum, D; Chakraborty, B; Cheng, H; Levy-Cooperman, N; Schoedel, KA, 2016
)
2.17
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. "( The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice.
Baftiu, A; Brodtkorb, E; Burns, ML; Dinarevic, J; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Kufaas, RF; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T, 2016
)
2.13
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED), still insufficiently studied regarding pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability. "( Pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate-A national approach to the evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring data and clinical outcome.
Brodtkorb, E; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Molden, E; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T; Sætre, E, 2017
)
2.14
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiepileptic drug that is approved as adjunctive therapy in adults with focal-onset seizures. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate: its effectiveness as adjunctive therapy in clinical trials and open studies.
Ben-Menachem, E; Holtkamp, M; Peltola, J; Shorvon, SD; Steinhoff, BJ; Trinka, E; Villanueva, V, 2017
)
3.34
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a promising antiepileptic drug structurally related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, which is in the final phase of clinical development. "( Disposition of eslicarbazepine acetate in the mouse after oral administration.
Alves, G; Caramona, M; Castel-Branco, M; Falcão, A; Figueiredo, I; Lourenço, N; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2008
)
2.14
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new voltage-gated sodium channel blocker currently in development for the treatment of neuropathic pain, including that of diabetic origin. "( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fontes-Ribeiro, C; Macedo, T; Martins, F; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Santos, AT; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2009
)
2.2
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new-generation voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, which has been demonstrated to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of epilepsy. "( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Costa, R; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Soares da Silva, P; Soares, E; Vaz da Silva, M, 2009
)
2.2
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily voltage-gated sodium channel blocker that has been developed for the treatment of partial epilepsy and other indications."( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects during a three-stage, open-label, multiple-dose, single-period study.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Nunes, T; Soares, E; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2010
)
1.48
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily novel antiepileptic drug approved in Europe for use as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. "( Hepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferase is responsible for eslicarbazepine glucuronidation.
Bonifácio, MJ; Fernandes-Lopes, C; Loureiro, AI; Soares-da-Silva, P; Wright, LC, 2011
)
1.81
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new member of the dibenzazepine family, and blocks the fast inactivated voltage-gated sodium channel."( [New antiepileptic drugs, and therapeutic considerations].
Szupera, Z, 2011
)
1.09
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebenix®) is a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker approved in 2009 by the European Medicines Agency as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and exposure-response relationship of eslicarbazepine acetate in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fuseau, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
2.05
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is an alternative treatment in associated therapy in patients with partial epilepsy who do not respond adequately to treatment in monotherapy."( [Eslicarbazepine acetate: a novel therapeutic alternative in the treatment of focal seizures].
Mauri-Llerda, JA, 2012
)
2.01
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel once-daily antiepileptic drug (AED) approved in Europe since 2009 that was found to be efficacious and well tolerated in a phase III clinical program in adult patients with partial onset seizures previously not controlled with treatment with one to three AEDs, including carbamazepine (CBZ). "( Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Bialer, M; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
2.09
"Eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel third-generation antiepileptic related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine with a benign adverse effect profile. "( Eslicarbazepine acetate in the management of refractory bipolar disorder.
Bhattacharya, A; Nath, K; Praharaj, SK,
)
3.02
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) is a novel central nervous system drug undergoing clinical phase III trials for epilepsy and phase II trials for bipolar disorder. "( Enantioselective HPLC-UV method for determination of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) and its metabolites in human plasma.
Alves, G; Caramona, M; Castel-Branco, M; Falcão, A; Figueiredo, I; Fortuna, A; Loureiro, A, 2007
)
2.03

Effects

Eslicarbazepine acetate has few, but some, drug-drug interactions. It is an effective, safe and well-tolerated drug for TN.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eslicarbazepine acetate has few, but some, drug-drug interactions."( Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures.
Galiana, GL; Gauthier, AC; Mattson, RH, 2017
)
2.62
"Eslicarbazepine acetate has shown to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated drug for TN. "( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
2.2

Treatment

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate was noninferior to BID carbamazepine-CR. "( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate versus controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy: A phase III double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study.
Ben-Menachem, E; Elger, C; Keller, B; Kowacs, PA; Löffler, K; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Trinka, E, 2018
)
1.14

Toxicity

Eslicarbazepine acetate has shown to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated drug for TN.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The incidence of adverse events, which were mild in severity, was similar between all treatment groups, including the placebo group."( Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of BIA 2-093, a novel putative antiepileptic agent, during first administration to humans.
Almeida, L; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2003
)
0.32
" All adverse events were mild in severity, except for 1 case of somnolence of moderate severity, which occurred in a subject receiving 1200 mg BIA 2-093."( Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of BIA 2-093, a novel putative antiepileptic, in a rising multiple-dose study in young healthy humans.
Almeida, L; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2004
)
0.32
"Newly designed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are being evaluated for their efficacy in preventing seizures and for their toxic profiles."( Neurotoxicity induced by antiepileptic drugs in cultured hippocampal neurons: a comparative study between carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and two new putative antiepileptic drugs, BIA 2-024 and BIA 2-093.
Ambrósio, AF; Araújo, IM; Carvalho, AP; Carvalho, CM; Leal, EC; Malva, JO; Soares-da-Silva, P; Verdasca, MJ, 2004
)
0.32
"In all parameters assayed, OXC was more toxic than the other AEDs used."( Neurotoxicity induced by antiepileptic drugs in cultured hippocampal neurons: a comparative study between carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and two new putative antiepileptic drugs, BIA 2-024 and BIA 2-093.
Ambrósio, AF; Araújo, IM; Carvalho, AP; Carvalho, CM; Leal, EC; Malva, JO; Soares-da-Silva, P; Verdasca, MJ, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common adverse events (AEs) (>10%) were dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea."( Efficacy and safety of 800 and 1200 mg eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures.
Almeida, L; Gil-Nagel, A; Lopes-Lima, J; Maia, J; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2009
)
0.62
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 51% of patients."( Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate: results of a 1-year open-label extension study in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.
Almeida, L; Cramer, JA; Członkowska, A; Elger, C; Guekht, A; Halász, P; Hodoba, D; Maia, J; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.64
" Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 83% of patients."( Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy: results of a 1-year open-label extension study.
Almeida, L; Ben-Menachem, E; Falcão, A; Gabbai, AA; Hufnagel, A; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2013
)
0.67
" Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation were dose dependent."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on treatment in patients with focal-onset seizures: integrated analysis of pooled data from double-blind phase III clinical studies.
Almeida, L; Ben-Menachem, E; da-Silva, PS; Elger, C; Falcão, A; Gabbai, AA; Gil-Nagel, A; Halász, P; Lopes-Lima, J; Nunes, T, 2013
)
0.7
" We collected the following variables: gender, aetiology of epilepsy, epileptogenic area, reason for switch to ESL, clinical response after initiation of ESL, adverse effects of ESL, refractoriness criteria and treatment discontinuation."( [Eslicarbazepine acetate in clinical practice. Efficacy and safety results].
Cimadevilla, JM; Fernández-Pérez, J; Payán-Ortiz, M; Quiroga-Subirana, P; Serrano-Castro, PJ, 2013
)
1.3
"Analysis of overall tolerability and neurological adverse effects (AEs) of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials."( Neurological adverse events of new generation sodium blocker antiepileptic drugs. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blinded studies with eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide and oxcarbazepine.
Fadda, V; Giovannelli, F; Maratea, D; Verrotti, A; Zaccara, G, 2013
)
0.82
" Despite a broad range of commonly used antiepileptic drugs, approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy have drug resistance or encounter significant adverse effects."( Eslicarbazepine acetate: an update on efficacy and safety in epilepsy.
Loiacono, G; Rossi, A; Verrotti, A; Zaccara, G, 2014
)
1.85
" Most (87%) began ESL because of poor seizure control and 13% because of adverse events (AEs) with CBZ or OXC."( Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal seizures: results of the 1-year ESLIBASE retrospective study.
Camacho, JL; Castillo, A; Flores, J; Garcés, M; Giner, P; Giráldez, BG; Guillamón, E; López González, FJ; López-Gomáriz, E; Mauri, JA; Molins, A; Palau, J; Rodríguez-Uranga, J; Salas-Puig, J; Serratosa, JM; Toledo, M; Torres, N; Villanueva, V, 2014
)
0.68
" Side-effect profile improved when OXC and CBZ recipients were switched to ESL."( Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal seizures: results of the 1-year ESLIBASE retrospective study.
Camacho, JL; Castillo, A; Flores, J; Garcés, M; Giner, P; Giráldez, BG; Guillamón, E; López González, FJ; López-Gomáriz, E; Mauri, JA; Molins, A; Palau, J; Rodríguez-Uranga, J; Salas-Puig, J; Serratosa, JM; Toledo, M; Torres, N; Villanueva, V, 2014
)
0.68
" ESL adverse events were mostly of mild and moderate intensities and consistent with previously reported observations for ESL."( Assessment of the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate in acute mania and prevention of recurrence: experience from multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase II clinical studies in patients with bipolar disorder I.
Almeida, L; Costa, R; Falcão, A; Grunze, H; Kotlik, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2015
)
0.68
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were dizziness, headache, fatigue, somnolence, nausea, and nasopharyngitis."( Efficacy and safety of conversion to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: a randomized historical-control phase III study based in North America.
Blum, D; Cheng, H; Grinnell, T; Harvey, J; Sperling, MR, 2015
)
0.67
" The overall adverse event profile was consistent with the known safety profile of ESL."( Efficacy and safety of conversion to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: a historical-control phase III study.
Bhatia, P; Blum, D; Cheng, H; Grinnell, T; Jacobson, MP; Pazdera, L, 2015
)
0.67
"2%) had ≥1 adverse effect (AE), that led to discontinuation in 7 patients."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine-acetate in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: Case series.
Camacho, JL; Castillo, A; Garcés, M; Giner, P; Giráldez, BG; Gómez-Ibáñez, A; Guillamón, E; López-Gomáriz, E; López-González, FJ; Mauri, JA; Molins, A; Palau, J; Rodríguez-Uranga, J; Salas-Puig, J; Serratosa, JM; Toledo, M; Torres, N; Villanueva, V, 2017
)
0.46
" The incidence of seizures was assessed via seizure calendars and the nature and severity of adverse events (AEs) were also recorded."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: Experience from a multicenter, observational study.
Agredano, PM; Bayarri, PG; Bermejo, PE; Campos, D; Falip, M; García-Morales, I; Gil-Nagel, A; Giráldez, BG; Gomariz, EL; González, FJL; Jiménez-Huete, A; Jovel, CE; Navacerrada, FJ; Ojeda, J; Palao, S; Pascual, MRQ; Prior, MJAA; Sáez, AA; Toledano, R, 2017
)
0.77
" The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and serious adverse events were analyzed."( Safety Profile of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Add-On Therapy in Adults with Refractory Focal-Onset Seizures: From Clinical Studies to 6 Years of Post-Marketing Experience.
Costa, R; Gama, H; Graça, J; Magalhães, LM; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vieira, M, 2017
)
0.79
"From a pooled analysis of four phase III studies, it was concluded that the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse drug reactions were dose dependent."( Safety Profile of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Add-On Therapy in Adults with Refractory Focal-Onset Seizures: From Clinical Studies to 6 Years of Post-Marketing Experience.
Costa, R; Gama, H; Graça, J; Magalhães, LM; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vieira, M, 2017
)
0.79
" Pooled safety was analyzed by means of adverse events and clinical laboratory assessments."( Pooled efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on treatment in patients with focal-onset seizures: Data from four double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase III clinical studies.
Ben-Menachen, E; Chaves, J; Elger, C; Gama, H; Gil-Nagel, A; Koepp, M; Kowacs, PA; Moreira, J; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Trinka, E; Villanueva, V, 2017
)
0.74
" Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation was dose dependent."( Pooled efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on treatment in patients with focal-onset seizures: Data from four double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase III clinical studies.
Ben-Menachen, E; Chaves, J; Elger, C; Gama, H; Gil-Nagel, A; Koepp, M; Kowacs, PA; Moreira, J; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Trinka, E; Villanueva, V, 2017
)
0.74
" Safety findings were generally similar to those of pivotal trials, with no major safety risks identified and with several specific adverse drug effects, such as hyponatremia, reported."( Comparing Safety and Efficacy of "Third-Generation" Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment.
Johnson, EL; Krauss, GL; Kwok, CS, 2017
)
0.46
" Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups for patients in the safety set."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate versus controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy: A phase III double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study.
Ben-Menachem, E; Elger, C; Keller, B; Kowacs, PA; Löffler, K; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Trinka, E, 2018
)
0.79
" Sixty-one per cent of patients presented some adverse event; four patients discontinued eslicarbazepine for this reason."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
0.75
"Our study supports the hypothesis that eslicarbazepine acetate is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment for the treatment of TN."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
1.02
"Eslicarbazepine acetate has shown to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated drug for TN."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Diaz-Maroto, I; García-Muñozguren, S; Gracia-Gil, J; Palazón-García, E; Perona-Moratalla, AB; Sanchez-Larsen, A; Segura, T; Sopelana, D, 2018
)
2.2
" There were no notable differences in overall tolerability between subgroups, but the incidence of some adverse events (eg, dizziness, somnolence, nausea) differed between subgroups and/or between treatment periods."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients converting from carbamazepine.
Blum, D; Cheng, H; Grinnell, T; Harvey, JH; Pazdera, L; Sam, MC; Sperling, MR; Strom, LA, 2018
)
0.79
"To evaluate the nature and incidence of psychiatric and cognitive adverse events (AEs) reported with eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) used as adjunctive treatment for refractory partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults."( Psychiatric and cognitive adverse events: A pooled analysis of three phase III trials of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate for partial-onset seizures.
Andermann, E; Ben-Menachem, E; Benbadis, SR; Biraben, A; Biton, V; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Cheng, H; Gama, H; Rocha, F; Shah, AK; Shneker, B; Trinka, E, 2018
)
0.91
" The probability of a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; dizziness, headache, or somnolence) was higher with an initial dose of ESL 800 mg than with an initial dose of ESL 400 mg QD."( Exposure-safety and efficacy response relationships and population pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Falcão, A; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Gidal, BE; Grinnell, T; Jacobson, MP; Ludwig, E; Moreira, J; Passarell, J; Rocha, F; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
0.7
"3%) patients experienced 152 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years with Focal Seizures.
Costa, R; Gama, H; Ikedo, F; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Steinhoff, B, 2018
)
0.75
" Study endpoints included treatment retention time, time on ESL monotherapy, change in standardized seizure frequency (SSF), change in quality of life (QoL) in epilepsy (QOLIE-31) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs related to allergic reaction, hyponatremia and thyroid function were also evaluated."( Long-term safety and efficacy following conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in adults with focal seizures.
Blum, D; Cheng, H; Chung, S; Grinnell, T; Jung, J; Shah, A; Sinha, SR; Stern, JM, 2019
)
0.76
" Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of special interest were evaluated."( Safety and Tolerability of Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients (Aged 4-17 Years) With Focal Seizures.
Blum, D; Cantu, D; Costa, R; Grinnell, T; Józwiak, S; Li, Y; McGoldrick, PE; Mintz, M; Moreira, J; Pina-Garza, JE; Wolf, SM, 2020
)
0.83
" Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout follow-up by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and ESL discontinuation due to AEs, respectively."( Safety, tolerability and effectiveness of transition to eslicarbazepine acetate from carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in clinical practice.
Assenza, G; McMurray, R; Peltola, J; Rocamora, R; Villanueva, V, 2020
)
0.8
" Safety was evaluated by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy for refractory focal-onset seizures in children: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase-III clinical trial.
Auvin, S; Falcão, AC; Gama, H; Kirkham, F; Moreira, J; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2020
)
0.87
" Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs-related withdrawals were pooled by direct or indirect meta-analysis."( The tolerability and safety profile of eslicarbazepine acetate in neurological disorders.
Chen, D; Chu, S; Liu, L; Tan, G; Wang, HJ; Zhu, LN, 2020
)
0.83
" Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study.
Chaves, J; Ikedo, F; Moreira, J; Rocamora, R; Soares-da-Silva, P; Trinka, E, 2020
)
0.84
" The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with ESL was 64."( Long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in children with focal seizures.
Blum, D; Cantu, D; Gama, H; Grinnell, T; Holmes, GL; Kirkham, FJ; Moreira, J; Pina-Garza, JE; Sankar, R; Tosiello, R; Wheless, J, 2020
)
0.81
" The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated for the older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults separately."( Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults.
Andermann, E; Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Cendes, F; Gama, H; Grinnell, T; Penovich, P; Ramsay, RE; Rocha, F; Rogin, J; Rosenfeld, W; Soares-da-Silva, P; Tosiello, R, 2021
)
0.87
"Analyses of adverse event data support the safety and tolerability of ESL in adults aged ≥60 years."( Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults.
Andermann, E; Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Cendes, F; Gama, H; Grinnell, T; Penovich, P; Ramsay, RE; Rocha, F; Rogin, J; Rosenfeld, W; Soares-da-Silva, P; Tosiello, R, 2021
)
0.87
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 81 % vs 73 %) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (16 % vs 2 %) were reported more frequently in Arm 2 than Arm 1, respectively."( Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as a first or later adjunctive therapy in patients with focal seizures.
Blum, D; Cantu, D; Gidal, B; Grinnell, T; Hixson, J; Mehta, D; Pikalov, A; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.93
" At least possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ESL post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed separately by age categories."( Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Elderly Versus Non-Elderly Patients with Focal Seizures: From Pooled Data of Clinical Studies to 8 Years of Post-Marketing Experience.
Costa, R; Gama, H; Magalhães, LM; Moreira, J; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vieira, M, 2021
)
1.02
" Here, we evaluate risk factors for the development of psychiatric treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in clinical trials of adjunctive ESL in adults with focal seizures."( Psychiatric adverse events in three phase III trials of eslicarbazepine acetate for focal seizures.
Altalib, H; Blum, D; Cantu, D; Grinnell, T; Ikedo, F; Vieira, M; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
0.97
" The reported adverse effects included one patient with gaze-evoked nystagmus and another patient with a rash."( Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy.
Kim, DW; Kwack, DW, 2023
)
1.19

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic profile of eslicarbazepine acetate was not affected by gender. Given the potential consequences of antiepileptic therapy nonadherence, missed-dose scenarios of 12- to 48-hour dose delays (4-hour intervals) were evaluated.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"75-4h and 6h postdose, after which they declined with an approximate mean apparent terminal half-life of 8-17h and 7-12h, respectively."( Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of BIA 2-093, a novel putative antiepileptic agent, during first administration to humans.
Almeida, L; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2003
)
0.32
" Median maximum plasma concentrations of the major metabolite (licarbazepine, (+/-)-10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-5H-dibenz/b,f/azepine-5-carboxamide) were attained (t(max)) at 2 to 3 h postdose; thereafter, plasma concentrations declined with a mean apparent terminal half-life of 9 to 13 h following repeated dosing."( Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of BIA 2-093, a novel putative antiepileptic, in a rising multiple-dose study in young healthy humans.
Almeida, L; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2004
)
0.32
"At steady-state, the pharmacokinetic profile of eslicarbazepine acetate was not affected by gender."( Effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093), a new voltage-gated sodium channel blocker.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Gellert, M; Maia, J; Mazur, D; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2007
)
0.86
" While eslicarbazepine Cmax did not significantly differ between the different groups, the extent of systemic exposure, assessed by AUC, increased when renal function decreased."( Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Mota, F; Potgieter, JH; Potgieter, MA; Soares, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2008
)
0.59
" At the end of each 4-week period, a 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiling was performed."( Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in children and adolescents with epilepsy.
Almeida, L; Butoianu, N; Falcão, A; Magureanu, SA; Minciu, I; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2008
)
0.6
" Test/Reference geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were calculated for AUC0- yen, AUC0-12 and Cmax of metformin."( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fontes-Ribeiro, C; Macedo, T; Martins, F; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Santos, AT; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2009
)
0.76
"There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between ESL and lamotrigine in healthy subjects."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and lamotrigine in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
" C(max) and AUC(0-t) were defined as primary pharmacokinetic parameters."( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects during a three-stage, open-label, multiple-dose, single-period study.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Nunes, T; Soares, E; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2010
)
0.76
" ESL was not associated with any clinically relevant changes in R-warfarin pharmacokinetic parameters."( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects during a three-stage, open-label, multiple-dose, single-period study.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Nunes, T; Soares, E; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2010
)
0.76
" The primary objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 1200 mg once daily and topiramate (TPM) 200 mg once daily in healthy subjects."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.84
" However, there was no difference between TPM elimination half-life following TPM co-administered with ESL and TPM administered alone (24."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
"Blood samples for the pharmacokinetic assessment were taken at pre-dose, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24h post-dose at steady-state in 51 patients stabilised on chronic (beyond 1 year) treatment with ESL 400mg (n=7), 800mg (n=26) or 1200mg (n=18) once-daily."( Pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate at steady-state in adults with partial-onset seizures.
Almeida, L; Elger, C; Falcão, A; Halász, P; Perucca, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2011
)
0.69
" The major compound in plasma was the active metabolite eslicarbazepine, which reached maximum concentrations (C(max)) 2h post-dose; thereafter, its plasma concentrations declined with a mean apparent half-life of 13, 14, and 20h in patients receiving ESL doses of 400, 800, and 1200mg once daily, respectively."( Pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate at steady-state in adults with partial-onset seizures.
Almeida, L; Elger, C; Falcão, A; Halász, P; Perucca, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2011
)
0.69
"The objectives of the current population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic analyses were to characterize the population PK of eslicarbazepine (the main active metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate), to evaluate the influence of patient factors and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the PK variability of eslicarbazepine, to assess the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the PK of concomitant AEDs and to investigate the relationship between eslicarbazepine systemic exposure and eslicarbazepine acetate antiepileptic activity in patients with partial-onset seizures uncontrolled with one to three AEDs."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and exposure-response relationship of eslicarbazepine acetate in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fuseau, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
0.8
" After ESL oral administration, the effective half-life (t(1/2,eff) ) of eslicarbazepine was 20-24 h, which is approximately two times longer than its terminal half-life (t(1/2))."( Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Bialer, M; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
0.64
" An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between pharmacokinetic parameters of 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel following ESL+OC and OC alone, and 90% confidence intervals (90%CI) for the ESL+OC/OC alone geometric mean ratio (GMR) were calculated."( Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of a combined ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel oral contraceptive in healthy women.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Gama, H; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2013
)
0.79
" The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between Test (SMV under co-administration with ESL) and Reference (SMV administered alone) treatments for AUC0-∞, AUC0-t and Cmax of SMV and SMV-acid."( Effect of repeated administration of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Falcão, A; Nunes, T; Pinto, R; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2013
)
0.66
" As a third-generation medication, ESL is believed to have favorable efficacy/safety profile and pharmacokinetic properties in comparison with related drugs (carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine)."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of eslicarbazepine for the treatment of epilepsy.
Banach, M; Borowicz, KK; Czuczwar, SJ, 2015
)
0.42
"The aim of the paper was to evaluate pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of ESL with aspect to epilepsy treatment."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of eslicarbazepine for the treatment of epilepsy.
Banach, M; Borowicz, KK; Czuczwar, SJ, 2015
)
0.42
" Sample blood levels of eslicarbazepine and (R)-licarbazepine were determined; pharmacokinetic parameters were derived for eslicarbazepine."( A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing Eslicarbazepine Acetate Administered Orally as a Crushed or Intact Tablet in Healthy Volunteers.
Blum, D; Cheng, H; Kharidia, J; Schutz, R; Sunkaraneni, S, 2016
)
0.71
" The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ."( The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice.
Baftiu, A; Brodtkorb, E; Burns, ML; Dinarevic, J; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Kufaas, RF; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T, 2016
)
0.69
"Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ."( The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice.
Baftiu, A; Brodtkorb, E; Burns, ML; Dinarevic, J; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Kufaas, RF; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T, 2016
)
0.69
"Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED), still insufficiently studied regarding pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability."( Pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate-A national approach to the evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring data and clinical outcome.
Brodtkorb, E; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Molden, E; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T; Sætre, E, 2017
)
2.14
"TDM-data from 168 patients were utilized for assessment of pharmacokinetic variability, consisting of 71% of the total number of patients in Norway using ESL, 2011-14."( Pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate-A national approach to the evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring data and clinical outcome.
Brodtkorb, E; Johannessen Landmark, C; Johannessen, SI; Molden, E; Reimers, A; Svendsen, T; Sætre, E, 2017
)
0.7
"Given the potential consequences of antiepileptic therapy nonadherence, missed-dose scenarios of 12- to 48-hour dose delays (4-hour intervals) for eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy were evaluated using simulated plasma concentrations of a population pharmacokinetic model (representing 493 subjects)."( Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation and Missed-Dose Simulations for Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy in Patients With Partial-Onset Seizures.
Bainbridge, J; Blum, D; Chudasama, V; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Ludwig, E; Marvanova, M; Phillips, L; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to assess dose selection, identify significant AED drug interactions, and quantitate relationships between exposure and safety and efficacy outcomes from Phase 3 trials of adjunctive ESL."( Exposure-safety and efficacy response relationships and population pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Falcão, A; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Gidal, BE; Grinnell, T; Jacobson, MP; Ludwig, E; Moreira, J; Passarell, J; Rocha, F; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
0.7
" No significant relationship was observed between sex, race and ABCB1 polymorphism and eslicarbazepine pharmacokinetic variability."( ABCB1 C3435T, G2677T/A and C1236T variants have no effect in eslicarbazepine pharmacokinetics.
Abad-Santos, F; Del Peso-Casado, M; Enrique-Benedito, T; Mejía-Abril, G; Navares, M; Ochoa, D; Ovejero-Benito, MC; Román, M; Villapalos-García, G; Zubiaur, P, 2021
)
0.62
" ESL shows a well-established pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic relationship and has similar extrinsic epilepsy-related factors across ethnicities."( The pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles of eslicarbazepine acetate are comparable between Korean and White subjects.
Cho, JY; Chung, JY; Hwang, I; Hwang, S; Jang, IJ; Kim, E; Lee, S; Oh, J, 2022
)
0.97

Bioavailability

To compare the bioavailability (BA) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. To demonstrate the bioequivalence (BE) between two active product ingredient (API) sources of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To investigate the bioavailability and bioequivalence of three different formulations of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093): 50 mg/mL oral suspension (test 1), 200mg tablets (test 2) and 800mg tablets (reference)."( Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) : relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 50 mg/mL oral suspension and 200mg and 800mg tablet formulations.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fontes-Ribeiro, C; Lima, R; Macedo, T; Neta, C; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P; Tavares, S, 2005
)
1.99
" The bioavailability of R-licarbazepine was essentially bioequivalent."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
"Concomitant administration of eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily and topiramate 200 mg once daily showed no significant change in exposure to eslicarbazepine but an 18% decrease in exposure to topiramate, most likely caused by a reduced bioavailability of topiramate."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.91
"To compare the bioavailability (BA) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and to demonstrate the bioequivalence (BE) between two active product ingredient (API) sources of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in healthy volunteers."( Bioequivalence of eslicarbazepine acetate from two different sources of its active product ingredient in healthy subjects.
Falcão, A; Lima, R; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sousa, R, 2013
)
0.92
" In vivo studies indicated that the formulated tablets had 2 times higher bioavailability than marketed tablets."( Formulation of cyclodextrin inclusion complex-based orally disintegrating tablet of eslicarbazepine acetate for improved oral bioavailability.
Desai, S; Poddar, A; Sawant, K, 2016
)
0.66
" Eslicarbazepine bioavailability was not significantly altered by crushing, indicating that ESL tablets can be administered intact or crushed."( A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing Eslicarbazepine Acetate Administered Orally as a Crushed or Intact Tablet in Healthy Volunteers.
Blum, D; Cheng, H; Kharidia, J; Schutz, R; Sunkaraneni, S, 2016
)
0.71

Dosage Studied

To investigate the dosage form proportionality and food effect of the final tablet formulation of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in healthy volunteers.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Within each of 4 dosage groups of 8 healthy male adult subjects, 2 subjects were randomized to receive placebo, and the remaining 6 subjects were randomized to receive BIA 2-093 (200 mg bid, 400 mg qd, 800 mg qd, and 1200 mg qd) for 8 days."( Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of BIA 2-093, a novel putative antiepileptic, in a rising multiple-dose study in young healthy humans.
Almeida, L; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2004
)
0.32
" Therefore, patients with mild to moderate liver impairment treated with ESL do not require dosage adjustment."( Pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with moderate hepatic impairment.
Almeida, L; Maia, J; Mota, F; Potgieter, JH; Potgieter, MA; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2008
)
0.67
" ESL dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients with a creatinine clearance <60 ml/min."( Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Maia, J; Mota, F; Potgieter, JH; Potgieter, MA; Soares, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2008
)
0.59
"To investigate the dosage form proportionality and food effect of the final tablet formulation of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in healthy volunteers."( Dosage form proportionality and food effect of the final tablet formulation of eslicarbazepine acetate: randomized, open-label, crossover, single-centre study in healthy volunteers.
Almeida, L; Cerdeira, R; Falcão, A; Fontes-Ribeiro, C; Lima, R; Macedo, T; Neta, C; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vasconcelos, T, 2008
)
0.79
"The bioequivalence criteria between the ESL 400 mg and 800 mg tablets were met and dosage form proportionality was demonstrated."( Dosage form proportionality and food effect of the final tablet formulation of eslicarbazepine acetate: randomized, open-label, crossover, single-centre study in healthy volunteers.
Almeida, L; Cerdeira, R; Falcão, A; Fontes-Ribeiro, C; Lima, R; Macedo, T; Neta, C; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vasconcelos, T, 2008
)
0.57
" * During long-term, open-label treatment for up to 1 year, eslicarbazepine acetate at a median dosage of 800 mg once daily produced sustained reductions from baseline in seizure frequency."( Eslicarbazepine acetate.
McCormack, PL; Robinson, DM, 2009
)
2.04
" Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval (AUC(0-24)) were calculated for eslicarbazepine (ESL active metabolite) and lamotrigine."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and lamotrigine in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
" Therefore, no dosage adjustment appears to be usually required in either lamotrigine or ESL when the drugs are co-administered."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and lamotrigine in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
" End/start of treatment geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were calculated for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval at steady-state (AUC(ss)) of eslicarbazepine (ESL major active metabolite), R-licarbazepine (ESL minor active metabolite) and TPM at Day 8 and Day 27."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.
Almeida, L; Brunet, JS; Falcão, A; Lefebvre, M; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Sicard, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2010
)
0.62
"0μg/mL, and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC(0-24)) were 132."( Pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate at steady-state in adults with partial-onset seizures.
Almeida, L; Elger, C; Falcão, A; Halász, P; Perucca, E; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2011
)
0.69
" The convenience of once-daily dosing and a short/simple titration regimen in combination with a comparative efficacy and tolerability profile might promote ESL as a valid alternative to the current adjunctive antiepileptic drug therapy armamentarium for drug-resistant partial seizures in adults."( Eslicarbazepine acetate for partial-onset seizures.
Luef, G; Rauchenzauner, M, 2011
)
1.81
" Most analyses used a model using log-transformed data from trough concentration (minimum steady-state plasma concentration during a dosage interval [C(min,ss)])."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and exposure-response relationship of eslicarbazepine acetate in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fuseau, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
0.61
" A continuous dose-response relationship was observed between eslicarbazepine concentrations and seizure frequency reduction, which was not affected by concomitant AEDs."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and exposure-response relationship of eslicarbazepine acetate in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Fuseau, E; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2012
)
0.61
" The smaller peak-to-trough fluctuation of eslicarbazepine in CSF (a measure of sustained delivery to the brain) than in plasma supports once-daily dosing of ESL."( Steady-state plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate and oxcarbazepine in healthy volunteers.
Almeida, L; Falcão, A; Nunes, T; Rocha, JF; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2013
)
0.62
" Formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if, for both 400 or 800 mg ESL dosage strengths, the test (TBM)/reference (MF) geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were within the predetermined range of 80-125%."( Bioequivalence of eslicarbazepine acetate from two different sources of its active product ingredient in healthy subjects.
Falcão, A; Lima, R; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sousa, R, 2013
)
0.72
" The mean area under the curve (AUC)ss,0-τ (in μmol h/L) following the last dose of an 8-day repeated dosing was 1156."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate and oxcarbazepine at steady state in healthy volunteers.
Almeida, L; Bialer, M; Elger, C; Falcão, A; Nunes, T; Soares-da-Silva, P; Vaz-da-Silva, M, 2013
)
0.66
" On most secondary measures, the dose-response relationship was relatively flat or showed saturation at higher ESL doses."( Abuse liability assessment of eslicarbazepine acetate in healthy male and female recreational sedative users: A Phase I randomized controlled trial.
Blum, D; Chakraborty, B; Cheng, H; Levy-Cooperman, N; Schoedel, KA, 2016
)
0.72
" Patients were switched because they experienced persistent seizures with OXC but were unable to tolerate increased OXC dosing due to adverse events."( Overnight switching from oxcarbazepine to eslicarbazepine acetate: an observational study.
Höfler, J; Kalss, G; Kirschner, M; Kuchukhidze, G; Leitinger, M; Rohracher, A; Schmid, E; Steinhoff, BJ; Trinka, E; Wendling, AS, 2017
)
0.72
" This improvement is more pronounced if the OXC-related AEs are most evident following morning dosing of OXC."( Transition from oxcarbazepine to eslicarbazepine acetate: A single center study.
Mäkinen, J; Peltola, J; Rainesalo, S, 2017
)
0.74
" Incidences of the most frequent TEAEs were lower for patients who initiated dosing at 400 versus 800mg QD, regardless of titration regimen and maintenance dose."( Adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate: A pooled analysis of three phase III trials.
Abou-Khalil, B; Biton, V; Blum, D; Cheng, H; Elger, CE; Gama, H; Grinnell, T; Krauss, G; Moreira, J; Rocha, JF; Rogin, JB; Trinka, E, 2017
)
0.84
" Based on the plasma concentration simulations conducted herein, potential dosing recommendations were developed that suggest a missed ESL dose should be taken when remembered, and the usual dose regimen resumed."( Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation and Missed-Dose Simulations for Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy in Patients With Partial-Onset Seizures.
Bainbridge, J; Blum, D; Chudasama, V; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Ludwig, E; Marvanova, M; Phillips, L; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
0.71
" AED extension studies evaluate treatment retention, drug tolerability, and drug safety during individualized treatment with flexible dosing and thus provide information not available in rigid pivotal trials."( Comparing Safety and Efficacy of "Third-Generation" Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment.
Johnson, EL; Krauss, GL; Kwok, CS, 2017
)
0.46
" At the dosage of 30 mg/kg/day, eslicarbazepine acetate-treated patients had a significantly greater reduction in baseline seizure frequency (weighted mean difference - 21."( Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients with Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Brigo, F; Cagnetti, C; Grillo, E; Lattanzi, S; Silvestrini, M; Verrotti, A; Zaccara, G, 2018
)
1.15
" This quantitative approach supported decision-making during the development of ESL, and contributed to dosing recommendations and labeling information related to drug interactions."( Exposure-safety and efficacy response relationships and population pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.
Ben-Menachem, E; Blum, D; Carreño, M; Falcão, A; Fiedler-Kelly, J; Gidal, BE; Grinnell, T; Jacobson, MP; Ludwig, E; Moreira, J; Passarell, J; Rocha, F; Soares-da-Silva, P; Sunkaraneni, S, 2018
)
0.7
" Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions, indications and dosage regimen are described."( [New possibilities of pharmacotherapy of epilepsy: eslicarbazepine acetate in treatment of focal epilepsy].
Karlov, VA; Vlasov, PN; Zhydkova, IA,
)
0.38
"6%), with no clear dose-response relationship."( Safety and Tolerability of Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients (Aged 4-17 Years) With Focal Seizures.
Blum, D; Cantu, D; Costa, R; Grinnell, T; Józwiak, S; Li, Y; McGoldrick, PE; Mintz, M; Moreira, J; Pina-Garza, JE; Wolf, SM, 2020
)
0.83
" The dose-response relationship was evaluated in regression models."( Eslicarbazepine acetate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Chang, XC; Hong, WK; Wang, Y; Xu, HQ; Yuan, H; Zheng, RY, 2021
)
2.06
" Thirty adult patients with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures were enrolled, and ESL was administered at a single loading dosage of 30 mg/kg."( Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy.
Kim, DW; Kwack, DW, 2023
)
1.19
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
anticonvulsantA drug used to prevent seizures or reduce their severity.
drug allergenAny drug which causes the onset of an allergic reaction.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
acetate esterAny carboxylic ester where the carboxylic acid component is acetic acid.
dibenzoazepine
carboxamideAn amide of a carboxylic acid, having the structure RC(=O)NR2. The term is used as a suffix in systematic name formation to denote the -C(=O)NH2 group including its carbon atom.
ureas
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (7)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.97280.531815.435837.6858AID504845
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224820
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.42561.069113.955137.9330AID720538
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.58750.006026.168889.1251AID488953
DNA polymerase kappa isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.67950.031622.3146100.0000AID588579
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency39.81070.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
P2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)20.00000.15602.93526.1000AID1064727
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (36)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
regulation of ruffle assemblyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
tissue homeostasisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transport into cytosolP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal action potentialP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of prostaglandin secretionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to ATPP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transmembrane transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to fluid shear stressP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
purinergic nucleotide receptor signaling pathwayP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
endothelial cell activationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood vessel endothelial cell migrationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to axon injuryP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium-mediated signalingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chemotaxisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of touchP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contractionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
relaxation of cardiac muscleP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to zinc ionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ATPP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwayP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microglial cell migrationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell chemotaxisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (10)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
purinergic nucleotide receptor activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellularly ATP-gated monoatomic cation channel activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated calcium channel activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (11)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
lysosomal membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell junctionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
terminal boutonP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell bodyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (35)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID195317Compound was tested for anticonvulsant activity against MES-induced seizures in rat1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID190110Compound was tested intraperitoneally for anticonvulsant activity by rotarod test1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID1064727Antagonist activity at human P2X4 receptor expressed in human 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced cytosolic calcium influx preincubated for 30 mins followed by ATP addition by Fluo-4 AM dye-based fluorescence assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 22, Issue:3
Carbamazepine derivatives with P2X4 receptor-blocking activity.
AID217795Displacement of [3H]BTX from voltage-gated sodium channel of rat cortical synaptosomes1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID194783Percent inhibition of 22Na+ uptake by voltage sensitive sodium channel of rat cortical synaptosomes at 30 uM1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID196514t max was for the anticonvulsant effect was tested in rats administered by gastric tube; t max1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID178166Compound was tested for anticonvulsant activity administered by gastric tube in rat by MES test1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID189163Protective index value of the compound, given by gastric tube (TD50/ED50)1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID196513t max for anticonvulsant activity was tested in rats intraperitoneally1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID189164Protective index value of the compound, given by intraperitoneally (TD50/ED50)1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID194782Percent inhibition of 22Na+ uptake by voltage sensitive sodium channel of rat cortical synaptosomes at 100 uM1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID176347Compound was tested intraperitoneally for anticonvulsant activity against MES-induced seizures in rat by MES test1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID190105Compound was tested for anticonvulsant activity administered by gastric tube in rat by rotarod test1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID1064725Antagonist activity at human P2X4 receptor expressed in human 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced cytosolic calcium influx at 20 uM preincubated for 30 mins followed by ATP addition by Fluo-4 AM dye-based fluorescence assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 22, Issue:3
Carbamazepine derivatives with P2X4 receptor-blocking activity.
AID194784Percent inhibition of 22Na+ uptake by voltage sensitive sodium channel of rat cortical synaptosomes at 300 uM1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 42, Issue:14
Anticonvulsant and sodium channel-blocking properties of novel 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide derivatives.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (220)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (0.45)18.2507
2000's32 (14.55)29.6817
2010's138 (62.73)24.3611
2020's49 (22.27)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 59.00

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index59.00 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.70 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.12 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index95.63 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (59.00)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials68 (29.69%)5.53%
Reviews44 (19.21%)6.00%
Case Studies6 (2.62%)4.05%
Observational14 (6.11%)0.25%
Other97 (42.36%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (63)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) as Monotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Partial-onset Seizures:a Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Clinical Study [NCT01162460]Phase 3815 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label Drug Interaction Study Between Eslicarbazepine Acetate 1200mg and Lamotrigine 150mg Following Multiple Doses Administrations in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02283801]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of BIA 2-093 and Oxcarbazepine in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01679002]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as First Add-on to Levetiracetam or Lamotrigine Monotherapy or as Later Adjunctive Treatment for Subjects With Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures: A Multicenter, Open-label, Non-randomized Trial [NCT03116828]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-07Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Historical Control Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy Not Well Controlled by Current Antiepileptic Drugs [NCT01091662]Phase 3172 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) as Adjunctive Therapy for Refractory Partial Seizures in a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Trial [NCT00988429]Phase 3653 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-02Completed
An Open-label Eslicarbazepine Acetate Long-term Safety and Tolerability Study in Children and Adolescents (4 - 17 Years) [NCT03108729]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-06Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was not withdrawn for safety reasons. The sponsor received approval for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients 4 years of age and older)
ZEBinix Retention Rate in Epilepsy in Elderly Patients [NCT04221282]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-04-01Recruiting
Long Term Eslicarbazepine Acetate Extension Study [NCT00910247]Phase 3274 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Historical Control Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy Not Well Controlled by Current Antiepileptic Drugs [NCT00866775]Phase 3193 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Dose Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Single and Multiple Dosing, Dose-escalation Phase I Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Zebinix (Eslicarbazepine Acetate) After Oral Administrat [NCT04095182]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-22Completed
[NCT01878578]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Terminated(stopped due to prematurely terminated due to impossibility of recruiting the planned number of patients by the study centre.)
A Phase 3, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Clinical Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Diabetic Neuropathic Pain [NCT01129960]Phase 3332 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated
Efficacy and Safety of BIA 2-093 as Adjunctive Therapy for Refractory Partial Seizures in a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT00957372]Phase 3253 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Effect of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics of Gliclazide in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02777671]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Phase I, Single Centre, Open, Randomised, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of Eslicarbazepine Acetate and Oxcarbazepine in Healthy Subject [NCT00900237]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effect of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics of Metformin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00971295]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Two Period Crossover Comparison of the Cognitive and Behavioral Effects of Eslicarbazepine Acetate and Carbamazepine in Healthy Adults [NCT02912364]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Effect of Repeated Administration of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) 800mg Once-daily on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Female Subjects [NCT00898560]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) as Adjunctive Therapy for Refractory Partial Seizures in a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial. [NCT00957684]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Effect of Repeated Administration of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT00987558]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Clinical Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia [NCT01124097]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated
A Non-Interventional, Prospective Study to Assess Seizure Control and Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy to One Baseline Antiepileptic Drug, in Adults With Partial-Onset Seizures With or Without Secondary Generalization [NCT01532726]56 participants (Actual)Observational2012-03-31Completed
Single-dose Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of an Oral Suspension and Two Tablet Formulations of BIA 2-093 in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02279667]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Adult Healthy Volunteers [NCT01879332]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
An Open-label, Single-dose, Single-centre Study, Investigating the Pharmacokinetics of BIA 2-093 in Subjects With Various Degrees of Renal Impairment [NCT02281422]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Single Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate 400mg, 600mg and 800mg Tablets Clinical Trial Formulation (CTF) Versus the To-be-marketed Formulation (TBM) in Healthy Male and Female [NCT02283840]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study Between Eslicarbazepine Acetate and Carbamazepine in Healthy Subject [NCT02284854]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase I, Open-label Drug Interaction Study Between Eslicarbazepine Acetate 1200mg and Phenytoin 300 mg Following Multiple Dose Administrations in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02283827]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
The Effect of BIA 2-093 on the Steady-state Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Warfarin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02287415]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of a Single 900 mg Oral Dose of BIA 2-093 and Oxcarbazepine in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01678976]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Effect of BIA 2-093 on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Female Volunteers [NCT02281448]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Multiple-dose, Single-centre Study, Investigating the Pharmacokinetics of BIA 2-093 in Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment. [NCT02281526]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Sources of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Healthy Subjects [NCT02284880]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of BIA 2-093 as Adjunctive Therapy for Refractory Partial Seizures in a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT00957047]Phase 3395 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2093) as Therapy for Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT00981227]Phase 2567 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
The Tolerability and Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single 800 mg Oral Dose of BIA 2-093 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02170649]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
A Single Centre, Phase I, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic Profile and Effects on EEG of Single Rising Oral Doses of BIA 2-093 When Given to Healthy Male Adult Volunteers. [NCT02171195]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
Single-dose and Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of BIA 2-093 and Its Metabolites in Healthy Elderly Subjects Compared With Those in Healthy Young Subjects [NCT02172755]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Effects of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (Esl, Bia 2-093) on Cognitive Function in Children With Partial Onset Seizures: an add-on, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT01527513]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Systematic Review: Retigabine for Adjunctive Therapy in Partial Epilepsy [NCT01587339]6,498 participants (Actual)Observational2010-09-30Completed
A Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of BIA 2-093 in Controlling Refractory Partial Seizures When Added to Ongoing Therapy [NCT02170077]Phase 2144 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2 093) in Acute Manic Episodes Associated With Bipolar I Disorder in a Double Blind, Randomised, Dose Titration, Placebo Controlled, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT01822678]Phase 2161 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF TWO SINGLE AND MULTIPLE HIGH DOSE REGIMENS OF BIA 2-093 IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS [NCT01879345]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Food Effect and Dosage Form Proportionality Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate Market Formulation in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02288312]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Disposition of Eslicarbazepine Acetate and Its Metabolites S-licarbazepine and R-licarbazepine Following Oral Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02281591]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Double-blind Study in Paediatric Epileptic Subjects Aged From 5 to Less Than 8 Years to Compare the Subject Preference for ESL Suspension Formulation With Alternative Flavours [NCT02021461]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Single Center, Single Dose, Open Label, Laboratory Blind, Randomized, Three Period, Six Sequence, Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Two Different Sources of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (800 mg) and to Assess the Dose Equivalence of Two Diff [NCT03116321]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-03Completed
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Rising Multiple Dose Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Steady State Pharmacokinetic Profile and CNS Effects of BIA 2-093, in Young Healthy Male Volunteers. [NCT02171234]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) in Acute Manic Episodes Associated With Bipolar I Disorder in a Double-blind, Fixed Multiple Dose, Randomised, Placebo-controlled,Multicentre Clinical Trial. [NCT01824602]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Due to a slow recruitment rate)
Extension Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) in the Recurrence Prevention of Bipolar I Disorder [NCT01825837]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Multi-centre, Multi-national Post-marketing Non-interventional Prospective Study Evaluating Retention Rate, Seizure Control and Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (ESL) as Adjunctive Treatment to One Baseline Antiepileptic Drug in Adul [NCT01830400]254 participants (Actual)Observational2012-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2 093) as Therapy for Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT00980746]Phase 2557 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2 093) as Adjunctive Therapy for Refractory Partial Seizures in Children [NCT00988156]Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-07Completed
The Effect of BIA 2-093 on the Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of Digoxin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02172742]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy in Subjects With Fibromyalgia: a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT01820585]Phase 2528 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase-1, Open-label, Drug Interaction Study Between Eslicarbazepine Acetate 1200 mg and Topiramate 200 mg Following Multiple Dose Administrations in Healthy Male [NCT02283814]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Effects of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) on Cognition and Psychomotor Function: Single-blind, Single-centre, Single and Multiple Dose, Fixed-order, Placebocontrolled Trial in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02284828]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (ESL) as Adjunctive Therapy for Partial Seizures in Elderly Patients [NCT01422720]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Preventive Therapy for Subjects With Migraine: a Doubleblind,Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial [NCT01820559]Phase 2452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2-093) as Monotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Partial-onset Seizures: a Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Clinical Study - Open-label ESL Extension [NCT02484001]Phase 3206 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Open Label Active-controlled, 4-period Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adult Men and Women [NCT02283788]Phase 167 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Tolerability of BIA 2-093 in Children and Adolescents With Refractory Partial Epilepsy [NCT02170064]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Seizure-free During the Last 4 Weeks on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During the 10-week Double-blind Monotherapy Treatment Period.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight >= 7%
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Reaching Each of the Exit Events.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in MADRS in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Randomization.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Completion Rate
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Completion Rate During the 10 Weeks of Monotherapy
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative 112-day Exit Rate as Estimated by Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Standardized Seizure Frequency (SSF) by Period
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Responder Rate (Proportion [%] of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).
NCT00866775 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L
NCT00898560 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration
NCT00898560 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification
NCT00898560 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity
NCT00900237 (2) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Plasma Concentration in Plasma and Cerebral Spinal Fluid
NCT00900237 (2) [back to overview]AUC0-t AUC From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Number and Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Subjects With Orthostatic Effects.
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Subjects With Potentially Clinically Significant Clinical Laboratory Evaluations
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During Study
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight ≥7%
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Responder Rate (Percentage of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Treatment Retention Time (Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy or Adverse Events)
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Subjects With QTc-F Changes (in Categories) From Baseline.
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Number and Percent of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Screening
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing Each Visit Post-one Year).
NCT00910247 (17) [back to overview]Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing the One Year Treatment)
NCT00957047 (2) [back to overview]PART I - Seizure Frequency
NCT00957047 (2) [back to overview]PART II - Nº of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT00957372 (2) [back to overview]PART II: Nº of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT00957372 (2) [back to overview]Seizure Frequency
NCT00957684 (1) [back to overview]Part I: Seizure Frequency
NCT00971295 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ - Area Under the Plasma Concentration From Time Zero to Infinity
NCT00971295 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration
NCT00971295 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT00980746 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain
NCT00981227 (2) [back to overview]Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose
NCT00981227 (2) [back to overview]Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin Tmax (Time of Occurrence of Cmax)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin AUC0-∞ (AUC From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin AUC0-t
NCT00988156 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency
NCT00988156 (2) [back to overview]Responder Rate
NCT00988429 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Responders
NCT00988429 (2) [back to overview]Seizure Frequency Over the 12-week Maintenance Period.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative 112-day Exit Rate as Estimated by Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Seizure-free During the Last 4 Weeks on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight >= 7% From Baseline
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Standardized Seizure Frequency (SSF) by Period
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Responder Rate (Proportion [%] of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Subjects Reaching Each Exit Criteria
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During the 10-week Double-blind Monotherapy Treatment Period.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Proportion (%) of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score of MADRS From Baseline in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Randomization.
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Score in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),From Baseline .
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing the 18 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment).
NCT01091662 (16) [back to overview]Completion Rate During the 10 Weeks of Monotherapy (% of Subjects Entering the Monotherapy Period Who Complete).
NCT01124097 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
NCT01129960 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
NCT01422720 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Standardized Seizure Frequency
NCT01422720 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01527513 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Power of Attention Score to the End of the Double Blind (DB) Period
NCT01527513 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency During the One-year Open-Label (OL)
NCT01527513 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Standardized Seizure Frequency - Part I
NCT01678976 (3) [back to overview]Total of Subjects Reporting at Least One Adverse Event
NCT01678976 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01678976 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)
NCT01679002 (3) [back to overview]AUC - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve
NCT01679002 (3) [back to overview]Number of of Subjects Reporting at Least One Adverse Event
NCT01679002 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration
NCT01820559 (1) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Migraine Attacks
NCT01820585 (1) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
NCT01822678 (1) [back to overview]Change in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score at the End of the 3-week Treatment Period, in Relation to the Baseline.
NCT01824602 (1) [back to overview]Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score From Baseline Until the End of the 3-week Treatment Period
NCT01825837 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Showed no Worsening According to the Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Scale (Intent-to-Treat Population)
NCT01879332 (1) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events Reported
NCT01879345 (4) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events Reported
NCT01879345 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-τ
NCT01879345 (4) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration
NCT01879345 (4) [back to overview]Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02021461 (1) [back to overview]Assessment of Taste Preference
NCT02170064 (3) [back to overview]Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax).
NCT02170064 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) Post-dose
NCT02170064 (3) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Seizure Frequency During Each 4-week Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Phase
NCT02170077 (1) [back to overview]"The Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction in Seizure Frequency (Further Referred to as Responders) in a Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period"
NCT02170649 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-oo)
NCT02170649 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification (AUC0-t)
NCT02170649 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT02170649 (4) [back to overview]Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax)
NCT02171195 (1) [back to overview]Total Number of Adverse Events
NCT02171234 (3) [back to overview]Total Number of Adverse Events
NCT02171234 (3) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT02171234 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-τ
NCT02172742 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Steady-state Plasma Concentration
NCT02172742 (3) [back to overview]AUCτ - Steady-state Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile Over 24 h
NCT02172742 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax at Steady-state
NCT02172755 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax)
NCT02172755 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - Time of Maximum Observed Concentration
NCT02172755 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve to Last Measurable Time Point
NCT02279667 (4) [back to overview]Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02279667 (4) [back to overview]Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02279667 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time
NCT02279667 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity
NCT02281422 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Peak Plasma Concentration
NCT02281422 (3) [back to overview]AUC(0-12h) - AUC From Time Zero to 12h
NCT02281422 (3) [back to overview]Tmax (hr) - Time at Which Cmax Occurred
NCT02281448 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-t
NCT02281448 (4) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT02281448 (4) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma BIA 2-194 Concentration
NCT02281448 (4) [back to overview]Tmax
NCT02281526 (2) [back to overview]Cmax - Peak Plasma Concentration
NCT02281526 (2) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve, AUC(0-tlast).
NCT02281591 (4) [back to overview]Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02281591 (4) [back to overview]Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02281591 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity
NCT02281591 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve to Last Measurable Time Point
NCT02283788 (1) [back to overview]QTcI - QT Interval Individually Corrected for Heart Rate - Day 5
NCT02283814 (3) [back to overview]AUCτ - Cumulative Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady State.
NCT02283814 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02283814 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02283827 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02283827 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time
NCT02283827 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02283840 (3) [back to overview]Tmax BIA 2-005 - Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration of BIA 2-005
NCT02283840 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time
NCT02283840 (3) [back to overview]Cmax BIA 2-005 - the Maximum Plasma Concentration of BIA 2-005
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Motor Reaction Time (MRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Motor Reaction Time (MRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Recognition Reaction Time (RRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Total Reaction Time (TRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Recognition Reaction Time (RRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284828 (6) [back to overview]Total Reaction Time (TRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (CBZ) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t (CBZE) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for CBZE
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (BIA 2-093) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t (CBZ) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for CBZ
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (CBZE) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02284854 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t (BIA 2-093) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for BIA 2-093
NCT02284880 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification
NCT02284880 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT02284880 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02287415 (3) [back to overview]AUCτ - Steady-state Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile Over 24 h, the Dosing Interval
NCT02287415 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Steady-state Plasma Concentration
NCT02287415 (3) [back to overview]Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax
NCT02288312 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ (BIA 2-005)
NCT02288312 (4) [back to overview]Tmax (BIA 2-005)
NCT02288312 (4) [back to overview]Cmax (BIA 2-005)
NCT02288312 (4) [back to overview]AUC0-t (BIA 2-005)
NCT02912364 (5) [back to overview]Profile of Mood States (POMS) Score.
NCT02912364 (5) [back to overview]MCG Paragraph Recall Scores.
NCT02912364 (5) [back to overview]Overall Composite Z Score of Neuropsychological Battery as a Measure of Direct Comparison of the 2 Antiepileptic Drugs.
NCT02912364 (5) [back to overview]Dual Task Percent of Time in Box.
NCT02912364 (5) [back to overview]Overall Z-score for Executive Function.
NCT03116828 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Completing 24 Weeks Adjunctive Therapy During Maintenance Phase

Percentage of Subjects Seizure-free During the Last 4 Weeks on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.

Seizure-free subjects during the last four weeks of monotherapy were determined as subjects who had seizure assessments during the 4 weeks between Visits 8 and 9 (Weeks 15 through 18), and did not have any seizures. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Weeks 15 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD13.3
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD14.4

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).

(NCT00866775)
Timeframe: 18 Week Double-blind treatment period

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Actual AttemptNon-suicidal Self-Injurious BehaviorInterrupted AttemptAborted AttemptPreparatory AttemptsSuicidalBehaviorWish to be DeadNon-specific Active Suicidal ThoughtsAct. Suicidal Idea. w/any method-no intent to actAct. Suicidal Idea.w/any method-some intent to actAct. Suicidal Idea. w/any method-Spec. Plan to act
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD001.501.504.64.61.500
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD0000003.10.80.800

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During the 10-week Double-blind Monotherapy Treatment Period.

Seizure-free subjects during the monotherapy period were determined as subjects who had seizure assessments during the monotherapy period, and did not have any seizures in the 10 weeks between Visits 6 and 9 (Weeks 9 through 18). Subjects who discontinued during this period were considered not seizure-free even if they were seizure-free at the time of discontinuation, i.e., to be considered seizure-free, subjects must complete the 10-week period without any seizures. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Weeks 9 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD8.3
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight >= 7%

(NCT00866775)
Timeframe: 18 Week Double-blind treatment period

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD2
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Reaching Each of the Exit Events.

The percentage of subjects reaching each of the 5 exit criteria. 1.One episode of status epilepticus.2.One secondary general partial seizure (in subjects who did not have gen. seizures during 6 months prior to screening).3.A two fold increase in any consecutive 28 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 28 day seizure rate during the 8 wk baseline period. 4.A two fold increase in any consecutive 2 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 2 day seizure rate during the 8 wk baseline period. If the highest number of seizures in any consecutive 2 day period during the 8 wk baseline was 1 then 3 seizures in a consecutive 2 day period was required to exit.5.Worsening of seizures or increase in seizure frequency considered serious or requiring intervention as judged by the Investigator. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
exit criterion 1exit criterion 2exit criterion 3 (investigator prog. assessment)exit criterion 3 (sponsors prog. assessment)exit criterion 4 (investigaor prog. assessment)exit criterion 4 (sponsor prog. assessment)exit criterion 5
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD06.710.08.38.310.013.3
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD0.80.84.25.95.15.93.4

[back to top]

Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.

The start of the monotherapy period was defined as the date of termination of all other AEDs while taking study monotherapy medication. Time on monotherapy was defined from the start of monotherapy period to the last dose of monotherapy treatment. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 18

Interventiondays (Median)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QDNA
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QDNA

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in MADRS in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Randomization.

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual symptom scores, ranging from 0 to 60, higher score indicates more severe depression. Each of the 10 symptoms of depression on MADRS was measured on a scale of 0 to 6 with 0 representing the lowest severity of the symptom and 6 representing the highest severity (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, Baseline: Day 0; End of AED taper/conversion period: end of week 8; End of monotherapy period: end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change from baseline to AED T/C pd n=7,13Change from baseline to end of mono pd n=6,13
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD-1.3-6.8
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD-7.9-9.6

[back to top]

Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.

The relative (%) change in standardized seizure frequency was evaluated for four periods: titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18). (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, Double-blind: weeks 1to 18; baseline:weeks-8 to -1; Titration: weeks 1 to 2; AED taper/conversion:weeks 3 to 8; monotherapy: weeks 9 to 18

,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Relative (%) change from baselne for DB periodRelative (%) change from baseline -tiration periodRelative (%) change from baseline -AED t/c periodRelative (%) change from baseline - mono period
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD-30.9-29.6-30.2-48.7
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD-41.5-52.4-39.7-38.6

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).

The QOLIE-31 overall score was obtained by using a weighted average of multi-item scale scores. The recorded responses were converted to 0-100 point scales. The mean of the individual item scores in each subgroup were calculated, with higher converted scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, baseline: day 0: End of AED taper/conversion period: end of week 8; End of monotherapy period: end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change from baseline to end of AED T/C pd n=39,86change from baseline to end of mono. pd n=36,86
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD3.27.8
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD6.36.4

[back to top]

Completion Rate

Subjects completing the study were determined as subjects who completed the 18 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD48.3
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD64.4

[back to top]

Completion Rate During the 10 Weeks of Monotherapy

Monotherapy completion rate was defined as the proportion (%) of subjects entering the monotherapy period who completed the 10 weeks of monotherapy treatment. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD64.4
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD81.7

[back to top]

Cumulative 112-day Exit Rate as Estimated by Kaplan-Meier Method

Cumulative exit rate was defined as the proportion of subjects meeting at least one of the five exit criteria over a 16-wk study period (start of Antiepilectic Drugs(AED) taper/conv.period (Wk 3 to end of double blind monotherapy period (Wk 18)):1.One episode of status epilepticus.2.One secondary general partial seizure (in subjects who did not have gen. seizures during 6 months prior to screening).3.A two fold increase in any consecutive 28 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 28 day seizure rate during the 8 wk baseline period. 4.A two fold increase in any consecutive 2 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 2 day seizure rate during the 8 wk baseline period. If the highest number of seizures in any consecutive 2 day period during the 8 wk baseline was 1 then 3 seizures in a consecutive 2 day period was required to exit.5.Worsening of seizures or increase in seizure frequency considered serious or requiring intervention as judged by the Investigator. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 3 to Week 18

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD0.444
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD0.287

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual symptom scores, ranging from 0 to 60, higher score indicates more severe depression. Each of the 10 symptoms of depression on MADRS was measured on a scale of 0 to 6 with 0 representing the lowest severity of the symptom and 6 representing the highest severity (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18; Baseline: day 0; End of AED taper/conversion period: end of week 8; End of monotherapy period: end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change from baseline to AED T/C periodChange from baseline to end of mono period
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD-0.4-1.1
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD-2.0-2.4

[back to top]

Standardized Seizure Frequency (SSF) by Period

Seizure frequency was evaluated by using a standardized frequency per 4 weeks (28 days). It was evaluated for five periods: baseline (Weeks -8 to -1), titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18). (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 18, Double-blind: weeks 1 to 18; Baseline: weeks -8 to -1; Titration: weeks 1 to 2; AED taper/conversion: weeks 3 to 8; Monotherapy: weeks 9 to 18

,
InterventionNumber of seizures in 28 days (Mean)
SSF during double-blind periodSSF during baselineSSF during titration periodSSF during AED taper/conversion periodSSF during monotherapy period
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD8.88.76.28.713.2
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD6.910.96.46.96.8

[back to top]

Responder Rate (Proportion [%] of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).

Responder rate was defined as the proportion (%) of subjects with a ≥ 50% reduction of seizure frequency from baseline. This analysis was done for the titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18) periods. (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, Double blind: weeks to 8; baseline:weeks -8 to -1; titration: weeks 1 to 2; AED taper/conversion: weeks 3 to 8; monotherapy: weeks 9 to 18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responder rate during double blind periodResponder rate during the titration periodResponder Rate during the AED T/C periodResponder rate during monotherapy period
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD36.746.741.735.0
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD39.851.743.232.2

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L

Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L (NCT00866775)
Timeframe: 18 Week Double-blind treatment period

,
InterventionPercent (Number)
≤ 135 and > 130 mEq/L≤ 13- amd > 125 mEq/L≤125 mEq/L
Eslicarbazepine 1200 mg QD2963
Eslicarbazepine 1600 mg QD61115

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration

To investigate whether multiple-dose administration of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, BIA 2-093) 800 mg once-daily (QD) affects the pharmacokinetics of the components of a combined oral contraceptive (ethinyloestradiol and levonorgestrel). (NCT00898560)
Timeframe: 15-day

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Cmax (ethinyloestradiol)Cmax (levonogestrel)
ESL and Microginon®75.04340
Microginon®82.44170

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification

To investigate whether multiple-dose administration of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, BIA 2-093) 800 mg once-daily (QD) affects the pharmacokinetics of the components of a combined oral contraceptive (ethinyloestradiol and levonorgestrel). (NCT00898560)
Timeframe: 15-day

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (ethinyloestradiol)AUC0-t (levonogestrel)
ESL and Microginon®0.45332.0
Microginon®0.66537.4

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity

To investigate whether multiple-dose administration of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, BIA 2-093) 800 mg once-daily (QD) affects the pharmacokinetics of the components of a combined oral contraceptive (ethinyloestradiol and levonorgestrel). (NCT00898560)
Timeframe: 15-day

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-∞ (ethinyloestradiol)AUC0-∞ (levonorgestrel)
ESL and Microginon®0.53343.1
Microginon®0.76852.1

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Plasma Concentration in Plasma and Cerebral Spinal Fluid

Cmax - Maximum plasma concentration CSF - Cerebral Spinal Fluid Oxcarbazepine, BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are active metabolites of Eslicarbazepine Acetate. (NCT00900237)
Timeframe: Day 9 - Pre-dose; 0.5h; 1h; 1.5h; 2h; 3h; 4h; 6h; 8h; 12h; 16h; 24h

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194) plasmaCmax (BIA 2-195) plasmaCmax (Oxcarbazepine) plasmaCmax (BIA 2-194) CSFCmax (BIA 2-195) CSFCmax (Oxcarbazepine) CSF
Eslicarbazepine Acetate23932886245755953893.2
Oxcarbazepine161624039199075662146448

[back to top]

AUC0-t AUC From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time

AUC0-t - area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last sampling time at which concentrations were at or above the limit of quantification CSF - cerebrospinal fluid Oxcarbazepine, BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are active metabolites of Eslicarbazepine Acetate. (NCT00900237)
Timeframe: Day 9 - Pre-dose; 0.5h; 1h; 1.5h; 2h; 3h; 4h; 6h; 8h; 12h; 16h; 24h

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-194) plasmaAUC0-t (BIA 2-195) plasmaAUC0-t (Oxcarbazepine) plasmaAUC0-t (BIA 2-194) CSFAUC0-t (BIA 2-195) CSFAUC0-t (Oxcarbazepine) CSF
Eslicarbazepine Acetate340123187433377154509117911522
Oxcarbazepine16472639034713586187239962485

[back to top]

Number and Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Number and percent of subjects with treatment emergent adverse events (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate220

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Orthostatic Effects.

Number and percentage of subjects with orthostatic effects. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate67

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Potentially Clinically Significant Clinical Laboratory Evaluations

Number and percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant clinical laboratory evaluations (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate186

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During Study

Percentage of subjects that are seizure-free during study (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate7.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight ≥7%

Percentage of subjects with increase of body weight ≥7% (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentagae of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate27

[back to top]

Responder Rate (Percentage of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).

Responder rate (percentage of subjects with a ≥50% reduction of seizure frequency from baseline). (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate62.4

[back to top]

Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.

The start of the monotherapy period was defined as the date of termination of all other anti-epileptic drugs while taking study medication. Time on eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy is defined from the date of the first monotherapy dose in 093-045 or 093-046 study to the last known dose of monotherapy treatment, regardless of dose change and the time gap between the parent studies and the current study. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionDays (Median)
Eslicarbazepine AcetateNA

[back to top]

Treatment Retention Time (Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy or Adverse Events)

The retention time is defined from the start of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy period in 093-045 or 093-046 to the last known dose of open-label eslicarbazepine acetate. The time may include taking eslicarbazepine acetate concomitantly with other anti-epileptic drugs. If a subject's termination reason(s) includes: withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, physician decision or other, then it was assumed the subject terminated the study due to lack of efficacy. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: One year

Interventiondays (Median)
Eslicarbazepine AcetateNA

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Subjects With QTc-F Changes (in Categories) From Baseline.

"Number and percentage of subjects by QT interval corrected using the Fridericia fomula (QTcF) categories~Based on the numbers of subjects who had at least one post-baseline assessment, the number and percentage of subjects with QTcF values in the following categories were summarized:~>500 millisecond (msec) at any post-baseline timepoint but not present at baseline~>480 msec at any post-baseline timepoint but not present at baseline~>450 msec at any post-baseline timepoint but not present at baseline~Change from Baseline >=60 ms for at least one post-baseline measurement~Change from Baseline >=30 ms for at least one post-baseline measurement and <60 ms for all post-baseline measurement~QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle." (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>500ms at any postbaseline not present at baseli>450ms at any postbaseline not present at baseline>480ms at any postbaseline not present at baselineCFB >=60 ms for at least one post-baselineCFB>=30ms for at least one &<60ms for all PBL
Eslicarbazepine Acetate091042

[back to top]

Percentage of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).

"The C-SSRS is an instrument designed to systematically assess and track suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. The C-SSRS will be completed by the Investigator or Sub-Investigator (or qualified site personnel).~Suicidal ideation is collected as any occurrence of wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.~Suicidal behavior is collected as any occurrence of actual attempts, Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior, interrupted attempts, aborted attempts, or preparatory acts or behavior, suicidal behavior.~Any suicidality is defined as having at least one occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation." (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of events (Number)
Any SuicidalityAny suicidal behaviorAny suicidal ideation
Eslicarbazepine Acetate4.00.73.6

[back to top]

Number and Percent of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L

Number and percentage of subjects who had normal sodium value (i.e. >135 mEq/L) at baseline but reached <=135 mEq/L and >130 mEq/L, <=130 mEq/L and >125 mEq/L, or <=125 mEq/L at any post baseline. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
<=135 mEq/L and >130 mEq/L<=130 mEq/L and >125 mEq/L<=125 mEq/L
Eslicarbazepine Acetate48224

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Screening

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual item scores . Each of the 10 symptoms of depression on MADRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 6 with 0 representing the lowest severity of the symptom and 6 representing the highest severity. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: baseline and Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate-1.5

[back to top]

Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.

Relative (%) change in standard seizure frequency(SSF) from baseline (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: Month 12 from baseline

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate-66.4

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).

"Change in the overall score from baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31 )~The QOLIE-31 overall score was obtained by using a weighted average of multi-item scale scores. The recorded responses were converted to 0-100 point scales. The mean of the individual item scores in each subgroup were calculated, with higher converted scores reflecting better quality of life." (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: baseline and Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate6.6

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual item scores. Each of the 10 symptoms of depression on MADRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 6 with 0 representing the lowest severity of the symptom and 6 representing the highest severity. (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate-1.5

[back to top]

Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing Each Visit Post-one Year).

Completion rate (% of subjects completing each visit post-one year). (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: post 1 year

Interventionpercentagae of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate66.7

[back to top]

Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing the One Year Treatment)

Completion rate (% of subjects completing the one year treatment) (NCT00910247)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionpercentagae of participants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate74.8

[back to top]

PART I - Seizure Frequency

The primary efficacy endpoint is the natural log transformation of the seizure frequency per 4 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the ITT population. Efficacy analyses were performed chiefly using data from the 12-week maintenance period in Part I of the study. The primary efficacy variable is the ln transformation of the seizure frequency per 4 weeks. Seizure frequency was compared between each active treatment group and the placebo group using an ANCOVA that models seizure frequency as a function of baseline seizure frequency and treatment. (NCT00957047)
Timeframe: 12-week maintenance period

Interventionln (Seizures) per 4 weeks (Least Squares Mean)
ESL 1200 mg Once Daily7
ESL 400 mg Once Daily8.7
ESL 800 mg Once Daily7.1
Placebo9.8

[back to top]

PART II - Nº of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Safety assessments were based primarily on AEs (Number of patients who experienced at least one AEs), and on whether these were related to the study medication, were serious, led to permanent discontinuation of study participation, or led to death. (NCT00957047)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAE270
TEAE With Onset Within the 1st 4 Weeks151
TEAE With Onset After 1st 4 Weeks240
Treatment-related TEAE194
TEAE Leading to Discontinuation37
Serious TEAE28
TEAE Leading to Death3

[back to top]

PART II: Nº of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

The primary objective for Part II of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, BIA 2-093) at doses titrated to an efficacy or safety endpoint over a 1-year open-label period. Safety assessments were based primarily on AEs (Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse events are reported); assessment of AEs was based on treatment relatedness, action taken on study drug, outcome, and causality. (NCT00957372)
Timeframe: 1-year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAE112
TEAE With Onset Within the First 4 Weeks of Part II40
TEAE With Onset After the First 4 Weeks of Part II94
Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Event66
TEAE Leading to Discontinuation From the Study9
Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event11
TEAE Leading to Death2

[back to top]

Seizure Frequency

The primary efficacy endpoint is the natural log transformation of the seizure frequency per 4 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis was based on results for the ITT population during the 12-week maintenance period. Seizure frequency was compared between each active treatment group and the placebo group using an ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor and seizure frequency as a covariate (NCT00957372)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionln (Seizures) per 4 weeks (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.3
ESL 800 mg5.7
ESL 1200 mg5.5

[back to top]

Part I: Seizure Frequency

"The primary efficacy endpoint is the natural log transformation of the seizure frequency per 4 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Efficacy analyses were performed chiefly using data from the 12-week maintenance period in Part I of the study. The primary efficacy variable is the ln transformation of the seizure frequency per 4 weeks. Seizure frequency was compared between each active treatment group and the placebo group using an ANCOVA that models seizure frequency as a function of baseline seizure frequency and treatment.to a frequency per 4 weeks basis" (NCT00957684)
Timeframe: 12-week maintenance period

Interventionln (Seizures) per 4 weeks (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.64
ESL 400 mg6.73
ESL 800 mg5.66
ESL 1200 mg5.35

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ - Area Under the Plasma Concentration From Time Zero to Infinity

area under the plasma metformin concentration from time zero to infinity (NCT00971295)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Metformin + ESL7362
Metformin7688

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration

Maximum Observed Plasma Metformin Concentration (NCT00971295)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Metformin + ESL1091
Metformin1224

[back to top]

Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax

time of occurrence of maximum observed plasma metformin concentration (NCT00971295)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionhours (Mean)
Metformin + ESL2.66
Metformin2.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain

Endpoint mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the treatment period. Likewise, baseline mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the baseline period. (NCT00980746)
Timeframe: 17 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ESL 1200 mg QD-1.7546
ESL 400 mg BD-2.2865
ESL 600 mg BID-1.6746
ESL 800 mg BID-1.8353
ESL 800 mg QD-1.9829
Placebo-1.5801

[back to top]

Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose

"Details of neuropathic pain, as recorded in a subject diary, were used for the primary assessment of analgesic efficacy. Subjects assessed their pain using an 11-point (0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain) NRPS upon awakening each morning and recorded the results in the subject diary. This score reflected the subject's mean pain over the previous 24 hours. Subjects were trained how to record their pain reliably. Investigators were trained in the subject's NRPS use during site initiation visits and at the investigators' meeting." (NCT00981227)
Timeframe: baseline and 13 weeks

InterventionPoints (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.5448
ESL 1200 mg/Day-1.8183
ESL 1600 mg/Day-2.0854
ESL 800 mg/Day-1.8236

[back to top]

Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

"The primary efficacy variable will be based upon an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, to be recorded in a patient's diary upon awakening each morning. This score should reflect the patient's mean pain over the previous 24 hours.~Please note that the change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain, i.e. the difference between endpoint mean pain and baseline mean pain, which are defined as follows:~Baseline mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain (NRPS) in the patient diary performed in the last 7 days before randomisation.~Endpoint mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain in the patient diary in the last 7 days of the treatment period." (NCT00981227)
Timeframe: baseline and 13 weeks

InterventionPoints (Least Squares Mean)
ESL 1200 mg Once Daily-1.9447
ESL 400 mg Twice-daily-1.9786
ESL 600 mg Twice Daily-1.6798
ESL 800 mg Once-daily-1.6633
ESL 800 mg Twice Daily-2.0834
Placebo-1.5441

[back to top]

Simvastatin Tmax (Time of Occurrence of Cmax)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionhours (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)1.50
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)1.62

[back to top]

Simvastatin AUC0-∞ (AUC From Time Zero to Infinity)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)108
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)54.6

[back to top]

Simvastatin Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)17.7
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)6.89

[back to top]

Simvastatin AUC0-t

"AUC0-t - area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last sampling time at which concentrations were at or above the limit of quantification~Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test)" (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)93.9
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)43.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency

Relative reduction in the standardised 4-week seizure frequency from the baseline period to the 12-week maintenance period. (NCT00988156)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Visit 7

Interventionseizures/month (Mean)
Placebo62.0
Esl (BIA 2-093)36.6

[back to top]

Responder Rate

Responder rate defined as the number of patients with at least a 50% decrease in the standardised 4-week seizure frequency from the baseline period to the 12-week maintenance period. (NCT00988156)
Timeframe: baseline up to Visit 7

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo40
Esl (BIA 2-093)41

[back to top]

Proportion of Responders

Subjects who had at least a 50% reduction from baseline in standardized seizure frequency during the maintenance period were classified as responders. (NCT00988429)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week-8 through Week -1) and Maintenance period (Week 3 to week 14)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo23.1
ESL 800 mg QD (ITT Population)30.5
ESL 1200 mg QD (ITT Population)42.6

[back to top]

Seizure Frequency Over the 12-week Maintenance Period.

(NCT00988429)
Timeframe: 12-week maintenance period (Week 3 to week 14)

InterventionNº Standardized Seizures by 4 weeks (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (ITT Population)7.88
ESL 800 mg QD (ITT Population)6.54
ESL 1200 mg QD (ITT Population)6.00

[back to top]

Cumulative 112-day Exit Rate as Estimated by Kaplan-Meier Method

"Cumulative exit rate was defined as the proportion of subjects meeting at least one of the following five exit criteria over a 16-week study period (from start of AED taper/con. period (Wk 3) to end of double blind monotherapy period (Wk 18)).1.One episode of status epilepticus.2.One secondary gen. partial seizure (in subjects who did not have gen.seizures during 6 mo. prior to screening).3.A two fold increase in any consecutive 28 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 28 day seizure rate during the 8 week baseline period. 4.A two fold increase in any consecutive 2 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 2 day seizure rate during the 8 week baseline period. If the highest number of seizures in any consecutive 2 day period during the 8 week baseline was 1 then 3 seizures in a consecutive 2 day period was required to exit.~5.Worsening of seizures or increase in seizure frequency considered serious or requiring intervention as judged by the investigator" (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: From beginning of Week 3 to end of Week 18

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg0.156
ESL 1600 mg0.128

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Seizure-free During the Last 4 Weeks on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.

Percentage of participants that were Seizure-free during the last four weeks of monotherapy were determined as subjects who had seizure assessments during the 4 weeks between Visits 8 and 9 (Weeks 15 through 18), and did not have any seizures. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 15 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg16.7
ESL 1600 mg17.0

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Subjects With Increase of Body Weight >= 7% From Baseline

(NCT01091662)
Timeframe: 18 Week Double-blind treatment period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg1.8
ESL 1600 mg11.7

[back to top]

Time on Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy.

The start of the monotherapy period was defined as the date of termination of all other AEDs while taking study monotherapy medication. Time on monotherapy was defined from the start of monotherapy period to the last dose of monotherapy treatment. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 18

Interventiondays (Median)
ESL1200 mgNA
ESL 1600 mgNA

[back to top]

Change in Seizure Frequency From Baseline.

The relative (%) change in standardized seizure frequency was evaluated for four periods: titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18). (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: 18 weeks, Double-blind:weeks 1-18; Baseline: weeks -8to -1; titration: weeks 1 to 2; AED taper/conversion: weeks 3 to 8; monotherapy; weeks 9 to 18

,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
Relative(%) change from baseline fo DB pd n=54,98Relative(%)chg from baseline for titrat pd n=54,98Relative (%) chg from baseline-AED t/c pd n=54,98Relative (%) change from baseline-mono pd n=48,87
ESL 1200 mg-36.1-19.3-39.4-45.7
ESL 1600 mg-47.5-35.6-42.9-52.1

[back to top]

Change in Total Score From Baseline in 31-Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31).

The QOLIE-31 overall score was obtained by using a weighted average of multi-item scale scores. The recorded responses were converted to 0-100 point scales. The mean of the individual item scores in each subgroup were calculated, with higher converted scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, Baseline: Day 0: End of AED taper/conversion period: end of week 8; End of monotherapy period: end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
chg from baseline-end of AED taper/covn.pd n=45,85change from baseline-end of monotherapy pd n=50,96
ESL 1600 mg5.84.7
ESL1200 mg3.44.0

[back to top]

Standardized Seizure Frequency (SSF) by Period

Seizure frequency was evaluated by using a standardized frequency per 4 weeks (28 days). It was evaluated for five periods: baseline (Weeks -8 to -1), titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18). (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Double-blind: week to 18; Baseline: weeks -8 to -1; titration: weeks 1 to 2; AED taper/conversion weeks 3 to 8; monotherapy: weeks 9 to 18

,
Interventionseizures in 28 days (Mean)
SSF during double-blind pd n=54,100SSF druing baseline pd n=54,98SSF during titration pd n=54,100SSF during AED taper/conversion pd n=54,100SSF during monotherapy pd n=48,88
ESL 1600 mg5.28.76.45.15.0
ESL1200 mg5.57.46.06.04.7

[back to top]

Responder Rate (Proportion [%] of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction of Seizure Frequency From Baseline).

Responder rate was defined as the proportion (%) of subjects with a ≥ 50% reduction of seizure frequency from baseline. This analysis was done for the titration (Weeks 1 to 2), AED taper/conversion (Weeks 3 to 8), monotherapy (Weeks 9 to 18), and double-blind (Weeks 1 to 18) periods. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, Double-blind weeks 1-18; baseline: weeks -8 to -1; Titration: weeks 1-2; AED taper/conversion; weeks 3-8; monotherapy weeks 9-18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
responder rate during the DB periodresponder rate during titration periodresponder rate during the AEDresponder rate during monotherapy period
ESL 1600 mg46.037.039.046.0
ESL1200 mg35.229.629.638.9

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L.

Proportion (%) of Subjects With Normal Baseline Sodium Reaching Blood Sodium ≤135 mmol/L, ≤130 mmol/L, and ≤125 mmol/L (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
≤ 135 and > 130 mEq/L≤ 130 and > 125 mEq/L≤ 125 mEq/L
ESL 1600 mg54.520.90
ESL1200 mg49.18.80

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Subjects Reaching Each Exit Criteria

"The proportion (%) of subjects reaching each of the 5 exit criteria-1.One episode of status epilepticus.2.One secondary gen. partial seizure (in subjects who did not have gen.seizures during 6 mo. prior to screening).3.A two fold increase in any consecutive 28 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 28 day seizure rate during the 8 week baseline period. 4.A two fold increase in any consecutive 2 day seizure rate compared to the highest consecutive 2 day seizure rate during the 8 week baseline period. If the highest number of seizures in any consecutive 2 day period during the 8 week baseline was 1 then 3 seizures in a consecutive 2 day period was required to exit.~5.Worsening of seizures or increase in seizure frequency considered serious or requiring intervention as judged by the investigator" (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 18, (beginning of week 1 to end of week 18)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
exit criterion 1exit criterion 2exit criterion investigator prog. assessment)exit criterion 3 (sponsors prog. assessment)exit criterion 4 (investigaor prog. assessment)exit criterion 4 (sponsor prog. assessment)exit criterion 5
ESL 1600 mg002.01.05.06.05.0
ESL1200 mg01.95.63.71.93.73.7

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Subjects That Are Seizure-free During the 10-week Double-blind Monotherapy Treatment Period.

Seizure-free subjects during the monotherapy period were determined as subjects who had seizure assessments during the monotherapy period, and did not have any seizures in the 10 weeks between Visits 6 and 9 (Weeks 9 through 18). Subjects who discontinued during this period were considered not seizure-free even if they were seizure-free at the time of discontinuation, i.e., to be considered seizure-free, subjects must complete the 10-week period without any seizures. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 9 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg7.4
ESL 1600 mg10.0

[back to top]

Proportion (%) of Events in Each Classification of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS).

(NCT01091662)
Timeframe: 18 Week Double-blind treatment period

,
InterventionPercent of particiants (Number)
Actual AttemptNon-suicidal Self-Injurious BehaviorInterrupted AttemptAborted AttemptPreparatory AttemptsSuicidal BehaviorWish to be DeadNon-specific Active Suicidal ThoughtsAct. Suicidal Idea. w/any method-no intent to actAct. Suicidal Idea.w/any method-some intent to actAct. Suicidal Idea. w/any method-Spec. Plan to act
ESL 1600 mg00.900000.9100.90
ESL1200 mg3.400003.41.70000

[back to top]

Change in Total Score of MADRS From Baseline in Those Subjects With a MADRS Score of ≥14 at Randomization.

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual item scores. From 0-60, higher score indicates more severe (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18, baseline:day 0;end of AED taper/conversion period; end of week 8; end of monotherapy period: end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
chge from baseline-end of AED taper/covn.pd n=7,16chg from baseline-end of monotherapy pd n=7,18
ESL 1600 mg-6.6-4.1
ESL1200 mg-3.9-6.1

[back to top]

Change in Total Score in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),From Baseline .

The total score of MADRS is defined as the sum of all individual item scores. From 0-60, high score indicates more severe (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 18,baseline day 0; end of AED taper/conversion period; end of week 8; end of monotherapy period; end of week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
chg from baseline-end of AED taper/covn.pd n=48,88chg from baseline-end of monotherapy pd n=54,98
ESL 1600 mg-1.8-1.6
ESL1200 mg-1.20.0

[back to top]

Completion Rate (% of Subjects Completing the 18 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment).

Subjects completing the study were determined as subjects who completed the 18 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: 18 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg75.9
ESL 1600 mg80.0

[back to top]

Completion Rate During the 10 Weeks of Monotherapy (% of Subjects Entering the Monotherapy Period Who Complete).

Monotherapy completion rate was defined as the proportion (%) of subjects entering the monotherapy period who completed the 10 weeks of monotherapy treatment. (NCT01091662)
Timeframe: Week 8 through 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ESL1200 mg85.4
ESL 1600 mg90.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

"The efficacy analysis was restricted to the primary efficacy variable in the analysis population. The intended treatment period, starting on the day of the randomization and ending at the efficacy cut-off date (October 31, 2011), was the basis for the analysis.~The primary efficacy variable was the difference between the mean values of 7 daily pain scores preceding the efficacy cut-off date (endpoint mean pain score), and before randomization (baseline mean pain score), respectively. The daily pain scores were based on the morning response to the 11-point Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) question relating to average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 [0 = no pain; 10 = the most intense pain imaginable]" (NCT01124097)
Timeframe: baseline to endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Esl 1600 mg QD-1.19
Esl 1200 mg QD-1.34
Esl 800 mg Once Daily (QD)-0.94
Placebo-0.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

"Study was prematurely halted. The efficacy analysis was restricted to the primary efficacy variable in the interim analysis population. The intended treatment period, starting on the day of the randomization and ending at the efficacy cut-off date (31st October 2011), was the basis for the efficacy analysis; patients with less than 20 days of study medication were excluded from the analysis, except those with early discontinuation. Primary efficacy variable was the difference between the mean values of 7 daily pain scores preceding the efficacy cut-off date (endpoint mean pain score), and before randomization (baseline mean pain score), respectively. The daily pain scores were based on the morning response to the 11-point Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) question relating to average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 [0 = no pain; 10 = the most intense pain imaginable]" (NCT01129960)
Timeframe: baseline up to endpoint 15 weeks (3-week titration phase and 12-week treatment maintenance phase)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Esl 1600 mg-1.56
Esl 1200 mg-0.90
Esl 800 mg-1.73
Placebo-1.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Standardized Seizure Frequency

Absolute and relative changes from baseline of seizure frequency standardised to a frequency per 4 weeks. (NCT01422720)
Timeframe: 8-week Baseline Period and 26-week Treatment Period

Interventionseizures/4 weeks (Mean)
FAS - Baseline Period4.8
FAS - Treatment Period3.6
PPS - Baseline Period4.0
PPS- Treatment Period3.1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events (AE)

"An AE was defined as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), if first onset or worsening was after the first intake of investigational medicinal product (IMP) and not more than 14 days after the last administration of IMP.~TEAE assessment:~patients who died~patients who died due to Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)~patients with at least one Serious Adverse Event (SAE)~patients with at least one Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)~patients prematurely terminated due to TEAE~patients with at least one TEAE~patients with at least one related TEAE~patients with at least one severe TEAE~patients without any TEAE" (NCT01422720)
Timeframe: throughout the study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
patients who diedpatients who died due to TEAEpatients with at least one SAEpatients with at least one TESAEpatients prematurely terminated due to TEAEpatients with at least one TEAEpatients with at least one related TEAEpatients without any TEAEpatients with at least one severe TEAE
Esl 800 mg3311101847312512

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Power of Attention Score to the End of the Double Blind (DB) Period

Power of Attention was defined as the sum of the reaction time measures from the attentional tasks (simple [dominant hand only] reaction time, choice reaction time and digit vigilance speed) in order to assess information processing speed and attention/psychomotor speed.Change from baseline to the end of the double-blind period in Power of Attention will be compared between the treatment groups using an ANCOVA. Non-inferiority of ESL vs Placebo will be assessed by comparing the 95% CI's upper bound of the difference of Least Squares Mean (LSmeans) between treatment groups (ESL-placebo) with 121 ms. If the upper bound is greater than 121 ms then the null hypothesis that the change from baseline in the Power of Attention score in ESL group is at least 121 ms inferior than the placebo group will be rejected. Single Values were calculated the average of post treatment visits (visits 5 and 7or EDV) minus average of baseline visits (visits 1 and 2) (NCT01527513)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (-4 weeks for training), Visit 2 (Day 1), Visit 5 (6 weeks), Visit 7 (12 weeks) or at early discontinuation visit (EDV)

InterventionMilli seconds (ms) (Mean)
Placebo111.085
Esl (BIA 2-093)59.122

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency During the One-year Open-Label (OL)

Overall Change from Baseline in Seizure Frequency per week for the One-Year Open-Label Period (NCT01527513)
Timeframe: Weeks 1 to ≥ 41 weeks

InterventionSeizure per week (Mean)
Esl PART II-3.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Standardized Seizure Frequency - Part I

(NCT01527513)
Timeframe: Baseline; Titration Period (4 Weeks: V2-V3-V4)

InterventionSeizures per week (Mean)
Placebo-9.13
Esl (BIA 2-093)-31.03

[back to top]

Total of Subjects Reporting at Least One Adverse Event

Monitoring of Adverse Events throughout the study: Safety was evaluated from the number of reported adverse events (AEs) by patient (NCT01678976)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
Interventionsubjects reporting at least 1 AE (Number)
All treatment-emergent AEsPossibly related to treatment AEs
BIA 2-09365
Oxcarbazepine64

[back to top]

Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was acessed for BIA 2-093 metabolites (BIA 2-194; BIA 2-195) and Oxcarbazepine. (NCT01678976)
Timeframe: at pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)Cmax (Oxcarbazepine)
BIA 2-093 900 mg od15753428140
Oxcarbazepine 900 mg od597817081268

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) to last measurable time point (AUC0-t) was acessed for BIA 2-093 metabolites (BIA 2-194; BIA 2-195) and Oxcarbazepine. (NCT01678976)
Timeframe: at pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-194)AUC0-t (BIA 2-195)AUC0-t (Oxcarbazepine)
BIA 2-093 900 mg od299065138771821
Oxcarbazepine 900 mg od214433491246549

[back to top]

AUC - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve

"AUC - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve for BIA 2-093 metabolites:~BIA 2-194 BIA 2-195 Oxcarbazepine" (NCT01679002)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h post-dose

,,
Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-194)AUC0-t (BIA 2-195)AUC0-t (Oxcarbazepine)
BIA 2-093 450 mg Bid283014190912699
BIA 2-093 900 mg od381601201643238
Oxcarbazepine 450 mg Bid268376488415196

[back to top]

Number of of Subjects Reporting at Least One Adverse Event

Number of of subjects reporting at least one adverse event. (NCT01679002)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionNumber of of subjects reporting at least (Number)
BIA 2-093 900 mg od9
BIA 2-093 450 mg Bid10
Oxcarbazepine 450 mg Bid11

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration

"Cmax - maximum observed plasma drug concentration for BIA 2-093 metabolites:~BIA 2-194 BIA 2-195 Oxcarbazepine" (NCT01679002)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h post-dose

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)Cmax (Oxcarbazepine)
BIA 2-093 450 mg Bid16667702182
BIA 2-093 900 mg od22210685208
Oxcarbazepine 450 mg Bid1219524811080

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Migraine Attacks

The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline in the frequency of migraine attacks standardised to 4 weeks in the Maintenance Period, as recorded in the subject diary. If there were less than 24 h between the end of 1 migraine event and the start of the next event, these 2 events were considered to belong to 1 migraine attack. There had to be a minimum of 24 h of freedom from headache, pain, and symptoms of migraine between attacks recorded in the subject diary to be considered as more than 1 attack of migraine for statistical analysis. (NCT01820559)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionnumber of migraine attacks/participant (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.8
ESL 800 mg-1.0
ESL 1200 mg-1.0

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain. Pain intensity was assessed on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain and was recorded in a subject's diary. The subject was instructed to complete the assessment daily on awakening.Primary analyses were conducted on the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all randomised subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and with at least 1 post-randomisation rating of 24-h-average pain. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain recorded in a subject's diary upon awakening each morning. An ANCOVA on the FAS revealed no statistically significant differences between the 3 ESL groups and the placebo group after 13 weeks of treatment. (NCT01820585)
Timeframe: Baseline and 13 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
ESL 400 mg-0.8
ESL 800 mg-1.2
ESL 1200 mg-0.8

[back to top]

Change in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score at the End of the 3-week Treatment Period, in Relation to the Baseline.

The YMRS is used to assess disease severity in patients who have been previously diagnosed with mania and it has proven psychometric properties through 11 item multiple-choice diagnostic questionnaire and the total score is determined from the summation of each 11 individual scores (and can range from 0 - 60) based on the patient's subjective feedback of his clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. A higher score indicates a worse rating for symptoms related to mania. At every visit throughout the study, investigators administered the YMRS. The results of the primary analysis of efficacy were calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Primary variable is presented through ANCOVA results for absolute change in YMRS total score from baseline (V2) to end of treatment (V7). A responder has at least 50% improvement (reduction) in the YMRS total score or has a total score of less than 12 points at the end of treatment period. (NCT01822678)
Timeframe: baseline and 3-week

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BIA 2-093 - 2400 mg (Maximum Dose)-14.2
BIA 2-093 - 1800 mg (Maximum Dose)-12.5
Placebo-10.3

[back to top]

Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score From Baseline Until the End of the 3-week Treatment Period

The YMRS is used to assess disease severity in patients who have been previously diagnosed with mania and it has proven psychometric properties through 11 item multiple-choice diagnostic questionnaire and the total score is determined from the summation of each 11 individual scores (and can range from 0 - 60) based on the patient's subjective feedback of his clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. A higher score indicates a worse rating for symptoms related to mania. At every visit throughout the study, investigators administered the YMRS. The results of the primary analysis of efficacy were calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Primary variable is presented through ANCOVA results for absolute change in YMRS total score from baseline (V2) to end of treatment (V7). A responder has at least 50% improvement (reduction) in the YMRS total score or has a total score of less than 12 points at the end of treatment period. (NCT01824602)
Timeframe: baseline and 3-week

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-17.7
ESL 600 mg-16.9
ESL 1200 mg-16.7
ESL 1800 mg-11.3

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Showed no Worsening According to the Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Scale (Intent-to-Treat Population)

The CGI-BP scale is a modification of the CGI scale, which provides a means of assessing severity and treatment-related improvement in manic and depressive domains reflecting clinically relevant degrees of change. The concept of improvement refers to the clinical distance between the individual's current condition and that prior to the start of treatment. The scale for 'severity of illness' measures mania, depression and overall illness on a 7 point scale from 1 ('normal, not ill') to 7 ('very severely ill'). The scale for 'change from preceding phase' and 'change from worst phase' measures mania, depression, and overall illness on an 8-point scale from 1 (very much improved) to 8 ('not applicable'). If the patient, in 'change from preceding phase', at any visit during the double-blind, has a score of 5, 6, or 7 in any of 3 categories (mania, depression, or overall bipolar illness), then the illness will be considered to have worsened. (NCT01825837)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BIA 2-093 300 mg26
BIA 2-093 900 mg14
BIA 2-093 1800 mg16

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events Reported

Safety was evaluated through the recording and monitoring of adverse events (NCT01879332)
Timeframe: 2 days

,,
InterventionNumber of adverse events reported (Number)
Nervous system AEGastrointestinal AEGeneral and Administration Site Conditions AEEye AESkin and Subcutaneous Tissue AE
BIA 2-093 3000 mg Once Daily65411
BIA 2-093 3600 mg Once Daily64110
Placebo11000

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events Reported

investigate the tolerability of two single- and multiple-dose regimens of BIA 2-093 (1800 mg and 2400 mg)considering the Number of adverse events reported by patient (NCT01879345)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

InterventionNumber of adverse events reported (Number)
BIA 2-093 - 1800 mg (Group 1)10
BIA 2-093 - 2400 mg (Group 2)7
Placebo7

[back to top]

AUC0-τ

Single dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following an oral single-dose of BIA 2-093 Multiple dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following the last dose of an oral 7- day once-daily regimen of BIA 2-093 (NCT01879345)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-τ (BIA 2-005) single doseAUC0-τ (BIA 2-005) multiple doseAUC0-τ (oxcarbazepine) single doseAUC0-τ (oxcarbazepine) multiple dose
BIA 2-093 - 1800 mg (Group 1)50756374029935896958
BIA 2-093 - 2400 mg (Group 2)44559690586045479956

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration

"Single dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following an oral single-dose of BIA 2-093 Multiple dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following the last dose of an oral 7- day once-daily regimen of BIA 2-093~Oxcarbazepine is a BIA 2-093 metabolite" (NCT01879345)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-005) single doseCmax (BIA 2-005) multiple doseCmax (oxcarbazepine) single doseCmax (oxcarbazepine) multiple dose
BIA 2-093 - 1800 mg (Group 1)3456947665241361
BIA 2-093 - 2400 mg (Group 2)3592656506508734

[back to top]

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax

Single dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following an oral single-dose of BIA 2-093 Multiple dose: pharmacokinetic parameters following the last dose of an oral 7- day once-daily regimen of BIA 2-093 (NCT01879345)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
tmax (BIA 2-005) single dosetmax (BIA 2-005) multiple dosetmax (oxcarbazepine) single dosetmax (oxcarbazepine) multiple dose
BIA 2-093 - 1800 mg (Group 1)3.82.14.673.83
BIA 2-093 - 2400 mg (Group 2)3.33.64.003.67

[back to top]

Assessment of Taste Preference

Subject preference for 3 flavours of the ESL oral suspension was assessed based on a measured score using a 0-10 cm (minimum and maximum measured values) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Higher values represent the stronger preference. (NCT02021461)
Timeframe: single Study Day

Interventionunits on a scale (0-10 cm VAS) (Mean)
ESL Banana Taste5.8
ESL Grape Taste5.8
ESL Tutti-Frutti Taste7.1

[back to top]

Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax).

(NCT02170064)
Timeframe: pre-dose, and ½, 1½, 3, 4½, 6 and 12 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Dosage regimen 5 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 15 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 30 mg/kg/day
Group 1 (2-6 Yrs)121
Group 2 (7-11 Yrs)233
Group 3 (12-17 Yrs)223

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) Post-dose

(NCT02170064)
Timeframe: pre-dose, and ½, 1½, 3, 4½, 6 and 12 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Dosage regimen 5 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 15 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 30 mg/kg/day
Group 1 (2-6 Yrs)69211618329935
Group 2 (7-11 Yrs)48201639526890
Group 3 (12-17 Yrs)63821719432400

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Seizure Frequency During Each 4-week Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Phase

"The efficacy variables were the percentage change in seizure frequency during each 4-week treatment period compared to the baseline phase.~Seizures were recorded in the patient's diary during the baseline phase and during the following 4-week treatment periods.~Seizure frequency for each patient was standardised to a frequency per 28 days period (i.e., mean daily frequency multiplied by 28). Changes in seizure frequency were analysed for each age group separately." (NCT02170064)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of 5 mg/kg/day treatment period (4 weeks), 15 mg/kg/day treatment period (4 weeks) and 30 mg/kg/day treatment period (4 weeks).

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
5Dosage regimen 5 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 15 mg/kg/dayDosage regimen 30 mg/kg/day
Group 1 (2-6 Yrs)-28.2-24.8-40.6
Group 2 (7-11 Yrs)-11.75.012.2
Group 3 (12-17 Yrs)-17.1-31.7-43.1

[back to top]

"The Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction in Seizure Frequency (Further Referred to as Responders) in a Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period"

(NCT02170077)
Timeframe: baseline, week 12

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
ODG - Once Daily Group54
TDG - Twice Daily Group41
PLG - Placebo Group28

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-oo)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-oo) of BIA 2-093 (NCT02170649)
Timeframe: pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
FastingFed
Single Group243589242459

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification (AUC0-t)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time at which concentrations were at or above the limit of quantification (AUC0-t) of BIA 2-093 (NCT02170649)
Timeframe: pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
FastingFed
Single Group243155229350

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum observed plasma concentration of BIA 2-093 (NCT02170649)
Timeframe: pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
FastingFed
Single Group1130212799

[back to top]

Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax)

Time of occurrence of Cmax of BIA 2-093 (NCT02170649)
Timeframe: pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
FastingFed
Single Group3.54.0

[back to top]

Total Number of Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined as any undesirable event occurring to a subject during the study, whether or not related to the investigational product (NCT02171195)
Timeframe: up to 20 weeks

,,,,,,,,
InterventionNumber of Adverse Events (Number)
All Adverse EventsAE Considered Not Related to TreatmentAE Considered Possibly Related to TreatmentAE of Mild SeverityAE of Moderate Severity
Group 1 20 mg72552
Group 2 50 mg30330
Group 3 100 mg70761
Group 4 200 mg20220
Group 5 400 mg10110
Group 6 600 mg10110
Group 7 900 mg20220
Group 8 1200 mg74370
Placebo70770

[back to top]

Total Number of Adverse Events

Total Number of Adverse Events. (NCT02171234)
Timeframe: up to 20 weeks

,,,,
InterventionTotal Number of AE (Number)
All Adverse EventsAE Considered Not Related to TreatmentAE Considered Possibly Related to TreatmentAdverse Events of Mild SeverityAdverse Events of Moderate Severity
Group 1 - BIA 2-093 200 mg b.i.d.93690
Group 2 - BIA 2-093 400 mg o.d.15213150
Group 3 - BIA 2-093 800 mg o.d.50541
Group 4 - BIA 2-093 1200 mg o.d.12012120
Placebo14113140

[back to top]

Cmax

Cmax - Maximum observed plasma concentration (NCT02171234)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 8

,,,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Cmax Day 1Cmax Day 8
Group 1 - BIA 2-093 200 mg b.i.d.30866683
Group 2 - BIA 2-093 400 mg o.d.78278824
Group 3 - BIA 2-093 800 mg o.d.1107418675
Group 4 - BIA 2-093 1200 mg o.d.1607125457

[back to top]

AUC0-τ

"AUC0-τ - Area under the plasma concentration time curve to last measurable time point~Day 1 - pre-dose, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, hours post final dose Day 8 - pre-dose, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post final dose" (NCT02171234)
Timeframe: Day 1 - pre-dose, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, hours post final dose Day 8 - pre-dose, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post final dose

,,,
Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
AUC0-τ Day 1AUC0-τ Day 8
Group 1 - BIA 2-093 200 mg b.i.d.2216363140
Group 2 - BIA 2-093 400 mg o.d.96262126308
Group 3 - BIA 2-093 800 mg o.d.159492268384
Group 4 - BIA 2-093 1200 mg o.d.250426423003

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Steady-state Plasma Concentration

Cmax - Maximum steady-state plasma concentration of BIA 2-005 (BIA 2-093 metabolite) and Digoxin (NCT02172742)
Timeframe: Day 6 and Day 7: pre-dose; Day 8: pre-dose, ½, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-005)Cmax (Digoxin) (Digoxin+Placebo)Cmax (Digoxin) (Digoxin+BIA 2-093)
BIA 2-093 + Placebo275712,3501,909

[back to top]

AUCτ - Steady-state Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile Over 24 h

Steady-state Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile Over 24 h of BIA 2-005 (BIA 2-093 metabolite) and Digoxin (NCT02172742)
Timeframe: Day 6 and Day 7: pre-dose; Day 8: pre-dose, ½, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUCτ (BIA 2-005)AUCτ (Digoxin) (Digoxin+Placebo)AUCτ (Digoxin) (Digoxin+BIA 2-093)
BIA 2-093 + Placebo3702971760716595

[back to top]

Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax at Steady-state

Time of Occurrence of Cmax Maximum steady-state plasma concentration of BIA 2-005 (BIA 2-093 metabolite) and Digoxin (NCT02172742)
Timeframe: Day 6 and Day 7: pre-dose; Day 8: pre-dose, ½, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
tmax (BIA 2-005)tmax (Digoxin) (Digoxin+placebo)tmax (Digoxin) (Digoxin+BIA 2-093)
BIA 2-093 + Placebo211

[back to top]

Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax)

"Single-dose period: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose.~Multiple-dose period: from Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, early in the morning, before the daily dose (for trough levels).~Day 12: pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-last dose.~BIA 2-194, BIA 2-195, and oxcarbazepine are metabolites of BIA 2-093" (NCT02172755)
Timeframe: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose From Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, before the daily dose (for trough levels). On Day 12, pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours p

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Single dose (BIA 2-194)Multiple dose (BIA 2-194)Single dose (BIA 2-195)Multiple dose (BIA 2-195)Single dose (oxcarbazepine)Multiple dose (oxcarbazepine)
Elderly Subjects94691506720953176.3135
Young Subjects98671730919246177.3150

[back to top]

Tmax - Time of Maximum Observed Concentration

"Single-dose period: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose.~Multiple-dose period: from Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, early in the morning, before the daily dose (for trough levels).~Day 12: pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-last dose.~BIA 2-194, BIA 2-195, and oxcarbazepine are metabolites of BIA 2-093" (NCT02172755)
Timeframe: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose From Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, before the daily dose (for trough levels). On Day 12, pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours p

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Single dose (BIA 2-194)Multiple dose (BIA 2-194)Single dose (BIA 2-195)Multiple dose (BIA 2-195)Single dose (oxcarbazepine)Multiple dose (oxcarbazepine)
Elderly Subjects2.962.0413.67.295.412.67
Young Subjects3.002.0411.37.585.412.67

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve to Last Measurable Time Point

"Single-dose period: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose.~Multiple-dose period: from Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, early in the morning, before the daily dose (for trough levels).~Day 12: pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-last dose.~BIA 2-194, BIA 2-195, and oxcarbazepine are metabolites of BIA 2-093" (NCT02172755)
Timeframe: Day 1 at pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose From Day 5 to Day 11 inclusive, before the daily dose (for trough levels). On Day 12, pre-dose, and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours p

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Single dose (BIA 2-194)Multiple dose (BIA 2-194)Single dose (BIA 2-195)Multiple dose (BIA 2-195)Single dose (oxcarbazepine)Multiple dose (oxcarbazepine)
Elderly Subjects19052128836457381591110141508
Young Subjects1747132906303361127825771490

[back to top]

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of BIA 2-093 metabolite: BIA 2-005 (NCT02279667)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK assays: pre-dose, 30, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
BIA 2-093 16 mL Oral Suspension 50 mg/mL2
BIA 2-093 - Four 200 mg Tablets3
BIA 2-093 One 800 mg Tablet3

[back to top]

Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

Cmax - the maximum plasma concentration of BIA 2-093 metabolite: BIA 2-005 (NCT02279667)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK assays: pre-dose, 30, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 16 mL Oral Suspension 50 mg/mL18048
BIA 2-093 - Four 200 mg Tablets16007
BIA 2-093 One 800 mg Tablet17042

[back to top]

AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time

AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time of BIA 2-093 metabolite: BIA 2-005 (NCT02279667)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK assays: pre-dose, 30, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 16 mL Oral Suspension 50 mg/mL323277
BIA 2-093 - Four 200 mg Tablets302026
BIA 2-093 One 800 mg Tablet299016

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity

AUC0-∞ - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity of BIA 2-093 metabolite: BIA 2-005 (NCT02279667)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK assays: pre-dose, 30, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 16 mL Oral Suspension 50 mg/mL325732
BIA 2-093 - Four 200 mg Tablets304219
BIA 2-093 One 800 mg Tablet301065

[back to top]

Cmax - Peak Plasma Concentration

BIA 2-194; BIA 2-195; Oxcarbazepine are BIA 2-093 metabolites (NCT02281422)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 1, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)Cmax (Oxcarbazepine)
Group 1 Normal Renal Function14286.790211.076138.339
Group 2 Mild Renal Impairment18677.265348.843172.293
Group 3 Moderate Renal Impairment15055.632410.828157.629
Group 4 Severe Renal Impairment14974.79465.928157.955
Group 5 End Stage Renal Disease14510.197359.798208.473

[back to top]

AUC(0-12h) - AUC From Time Zero to 12h

"BIA 2-194; BIA 2-195; Oxcarbazepine are BIA 2-093 metabolites~AUC - area under the plasma concentration versus time curve" (NCT02281422)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 1, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,,
Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC(0-12h) (BIA 2-194)AUC(0-12h) (BIA 2-195)AUC(0-12h) (Oxcarbazepine)
Group 1 Normal Renal Function105275.7331522.3701218.276
Group 2 Mild Renal Impairment150945.0342435.2451388.146
Group 3 Moderate Renal Impairment138473.1152025.7311460.113
Group 4 Severe Renal Impairment138262.8142157.8601496.463
Group 5 End Stage Renal Disease134757.9362690.5841832.298

[back to top]

Tmax (hr) - Time at Which Cmax Occurred

"BIA 2-194; BIA 2-195; Oxcarbazepine are BIA 2-093 metabolites~Cmax - maximum observed plasma drug concentration" (NCT02281422)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 1, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Tmax (BIA 2-194)Tmax (BIA 2-195)Tmax (Oxcarbazepine)
Group 1 Normal Renal Function1.12122.0082.396
Group 2 Mild Renal Impairment1.32720.1852.581
Group 3 Moderate Renal Impairment2.60926.1723.970
Group 4 Severe Renal Impairment2.68033.9474.787
Group 5 End Stage Renal Disease1.63310.7734.260

[back to top]

AUC0-t

AUC0-t (ng.h/mL) following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® concomitantly with the 14th dose of a 15-day oral regimen of BIA 2-093 1200 mg once-daily (Test) and following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® administered alone (Reference) (NCT02281448)
Timeframe: pre-dose, on Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 of the BIA 2-093 + OC period.

Interventionpg.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (ethinyloestradiol) TestAUC0-t (ethinyloestradiol) ReferenceAUC0-t (Levonorgestrel) TestAUC0-t (Levonorgestrel) Reference
Overall Population3475952400033600

[back to top]

Cmax

Cmax following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® concomitantly with the 14th dose of a 15-day oral regimen of BIA 2-093 1200 mg once-daily (Test) and following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® administered alone (Reference) (NCT02281448)
Timeframe: pre-dose, on Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 of the BIA 2-093 + OC period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Cmax (ethinyloestradiol) TestCmax (ethinyloestradiol) ReferenceCmax (Levonorgestrel) TestCmax (Levonorgestrel) Reference
Overall Population53.466.132203720

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Plasma BIA 2-194 Concentration

Cmax - Maximum observed plasma BIA 2-194 concentration on days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 during a 15-day oral regimen of BIA 2-093 1200 mg once-daily. (NCT02281448)
Timeframe: Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 during a 15-day oral regimen of BIA 2-093 1200 mg once-daily.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 4Day 6Day 8Day 10Day 12Day 14Day 15
Cmax (BIA 2-194)0.0084431069110961101751033210821106709978

[back to top]

Tmax

Tmax following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® concomitantly with the 14th dose of a 15-day oral regimen of BIA 2-093 1200 mg once-daily (Test) and following administration of a single-dose of Microginon® administered alone (Reference) (NCT02281448)
Timeframe: pre-dose, on Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 of the BIA 2-093 + OC period.

Interventionh (Mean)
tmax (ethinyloestradiol) Testtmax (ethinyloestradiol) Referencetmax (Levonorgestrel) Testtmax (Levonorgestrel) Reference
Overall Population1.671.521.281.21

[back to top]

Cmax - Peak Plasma Concentration

Day 1 - Cmax Peak plasma concentration (NCT02281526)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 1, 2, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5, 7, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax BIA 2-093Cmax BIA 2-194Cmax 2-195 GlucoronideCmax OxcarbazepineCmax BIA 2-093 GlucoronideCmax BIA 2-194 Glucoronide
Subjects - Healthy Controls99.50018180.00016.667121.0005.0001381.125
Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment477.50016392.77816.875100.1119.0001067.000

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve, AUC(0-tlast).

"Day 1 - Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, AUC(0-tlast).~BIA 2-194, 2-195 Glucoronide, Oxcarbazepine, BIA 2-093 Glucoronide, 2-194 Glucoronide are BIA 2-093 metabolites." (NCT02281526)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 1, 2, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5, 7, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionh·ng/mL (Mean)
AUC(0-tlast) BIA 2-093AUC(0-tlast) BIA 2-194AUC(0-tlast) 2-195 GlucoronideAUC(0-tlast) OxcarbazepineAUC(0-tlast) BIA 2-093 GlucoronideAUC(0-tlast) BIA 2-194 Glucoronide
Subjects - Healthy Controls49.750234750.429157.7381899.0922.50011642.372
Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment954.891240188.36950.6031489.5306.8758634.780

[back to top]

Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

(NCT02281591)
Timeframe: Phase A: pre-dose (Day 1); and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.Phase B: Days 6 to 10 inclusively: pre-dose. Day 11 (last dose): pre-dose; and ½, 1, 1½,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)Cmax (Oxcarbazepine)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate15809222136
R-licarbazepine4376941101
S-licarbazepine1036413292.8
S-licarbazepine R-licarbazepine104968099261

[back to top]

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax

(NCT02281591)
Timeframe: Phase A: pre-dose (Day 1); and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.Phase B: Days 6 to 10 inclusively: pre-dose. Day 11 (last dose): pre-dose; and ½, 1, 1½,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
tmax (BIA 2-194)tmax (BIA 2-195)tmax (Oxcarbazepine)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate1.9918.63.59
R-licarbazepine10.71.221.21
S-licarbazepine0.96511.71.36
S-licarbazepine R-licarbazepine1.011.411.34

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity

(NCT02281591)
Timeframe: Phase A: pre-dose (Day 1); and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.Phase B: Days 6 to 10 inclusively: pre-dose. Day 11 (last dose): pre-dose; and ½, 1, 1½,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-∞ (BIA 2-194)AUC0-∞ (BIA 2-195)AUC0-∞ (Oxcarbazepine)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate27119188163181
R-licarbazepine11003660871073
S-licarbazepine13272454172500
S-licarbazepine R-licarbazepine2014091168844726

[back to top]

AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve to Last Measurable Time Point

(NCT02281591)
Timeframe: Phase A: pre-dose (Day 1); and ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.Phase B: Days 6 to 10 inclusively: pre-dose. Day 11 (last dose): pre-dose; and ½, 1, 1½,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-194)AUC0-t (BIA 2-195)AUC0-t (Oxcarbazepine)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate26804567571947
R-licarbazepine941965203422
S-licarbazepine1301473074748
S-licarbazepine R-licarbazepine1983131146353401

[back to top]

QTcI - QT Interval Individually Corrected for Heart Rate - Day 5

(NCT02283788)
Timeframe: -30 minutes (pre-dose) 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 23.5 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
0.5 hr1 hour1.5 hours2 hours3 hours4 hours5 hours6 hours8 hours12 hours16 hours23.5 hours
BIA 2-093 1200 mg-8.05-9.34-8.70-9.48-8.04-7.72-3.54-4.59-2.63-0.01-3.72-3.36
BIA 2-093 2400 mg-6.15-7.34-8.67-8.31-8.50-6.16-1.71-2.64-1.360.03-4.65-0.06
Moxifloxacin 400 mg-2.773.805.306.878.4910.137.075.835.805.855.212.39
Placebo-4.39-4.14-4.22-5.32-3.24-2.10-0.75-3.10-1.77-1.44-1.41-1.71

[back to top]

AUCτ - Cumulative Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady State.

(NCT02283814)
Timeframe: Time Frame: Group A:Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration; Group B: Day 8 and 27 within 5 minutes prior dosing and 0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.33,1.67,2,2.5,3,4,6,9,12,16 and 24h

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUCτ (BIA 2-194)AUCτ (BIA 2-195)
BIA 2-093389794.322886.8
BIA 2-093 + TPM361733.919611.8

[back to top]

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax

BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are metabolites/active forms of eslicarbazepine acetate Both Groups A and B described in participant flow recieved BIA 2-093 and Topiramate. The results presented here are related with the different interventions in both groups (NCT02283814)
Timeframe: Time Frame: Group A:Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration; Group B: Day 8 and 27 within 5 minutes prior dosing and 0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.33,1.67,2,2.5,3,4,6,9,12,16 and 24h

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Tmax (BIA 2-194)Tmax (BIA 2-195)
BIA 2-0932.006.00
BIA 2-093 + TPM2.009.00

[back to top]

Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are metabolites/active forms of eslicarbazepine acetate (NCT02283814)
Timeframe: Time Frame: Group A:Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration; Group B: Day 8 and 27 within 5 minutes prior dosing and 0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.33,1.67,2,2.5,3,4,6,9,12,16 and 24h

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)
BIA 2-09325414.81062.6
BIA 2-093 + TPM21960.6931.8

[back to top]

Cmax - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are metabolites of eslicarbazepine acetate (NCT02283827)
Timeframe: Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-194)Cmax (BIA 2-195)Cmax (PHT)
BIA 2-09323806.5954.39405.1
BIA 2-093 + Phenytoin16350.6976.912868.5

[back to top]

AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time

"AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time~BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are metabolites of eslicarbazepine acetate" (NCT02283827)
Timeframe: Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-194)AUC0-t (BIA 2-195)AUC0-t (PHT)
BIA 2-093371574.920675.0186826.5
BIA 2-093 + Phenytoin (PHT)251055.219471.2264784.8

[back to top]

Tmax - the Time of Occurrence of Cmax

BIA 2-194 and BIA 2-195 are metabolites of eslicarbazepine acetate (NCT02283827)
Timeframe: Day 8 and 27: within 5 minutes prior to dosing and 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,6,9,12,16 and 24 hours after drug administration

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Tmax (BIA 2-194)Tmax (BIA 2-195)Tmax (PHT)
BIA 2-0932.509.004.00
BIA 2-093 + Phenytoin (PHT)3.009.004.00

[back to top]

Tmax BIA 2-005 - Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration of BIA 2-005

(NCT02283840)
Timeframe: prior to and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after drug administration

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Tmax (BIA 2-005) TestTmax (BIA 2-005) Reference
Cohort A:BIA 2-093 400 mg2.002.50
Cohort B:BIA 2-093 600 mg2.503.00
Cohort C:BIA 2-093 800 mg3.003.00

[back to top]

AUC0-t - the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time

(NCT02283840)
Timeframe: prior to and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after drug administration

,,
Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-093) TestAUC0-t (BIA 2-093) Reference
Cohort A:BIA 2-093 400 mg125739.8122134.1
Cohort B:BIA 2-093 600 mg219560.8215750.4
Cohort C:BIA 2-093 800 mg294749.1293959.9

[back to top]

Cmax BIA 2-005 - the Maximum Plasma Concentration of BIA 2-005

(NCT02283840)
Timeframe: prior to and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after drug administration

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-005) TestCmax (BIA 2-005) Reference
Cohort A:BIA 2-093 400 mg7107.76660.3
Cohort B:BIA 2-093 600 mg10724.810404.5
Cohort C:BIA 2-093 800 mg13186.412767.6

[back to top]

Motor Reaction Time (MRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-0934.10.7-10.8

[back to top]

Motor Reaction Time (MRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
Pre-dose3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-093587.0590.3588.2576.5

[back to top]

Recognition Reaction Time (RRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
Pre-dose3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-093425.0414.0419.3408.0

[back to top]

Total Reaction Time (TRT) (ms): Raw Values at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
Pre-dose3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-0931011.91004.31007.5984.5

[back to top]

Recognition Reaction Time (RRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-093-11.1-9.2-19.3

[back to top]

Total Reaction Time (TRT) (ms): Change From Baseline at Each Time Point During Acute Dosing Phase

(NCT02284828)
Timeframe: -1, 3, 6, and 10 hours post-dose

Interventionmiliseconds (Mean)
3 hours6 hours10 hours
Group 1 BIA 2-093-7.0-8.4-30.0

[back to top]

Cmax (CBZ) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

Reference - Day 28 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg Test - Day 35 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 28 to 35

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax CBZ (D28 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)Cmax CBZ (D35 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)
Group B104149719

[back to top]

AUC0-t (CBZE) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for CBZE

"Reference - Day 28 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg Test - Day 35 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg~CBZE - carbamazepine-epoxide is the active metabolite of CBZ" (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 28 to 35

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t CBZE (D28 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)AUC0-t CBZE (D35 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)
Group B1532214953

[back to top]

Cmax (BIA 2-093) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

Reference - Day 7 following once-daily oral administration of ESL 800 mg Test - Day 35 following once-daily oral administration of ESL 800 mg (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 7 to 35

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax ESL (D7 ESL 800mg)Cmax ESL (D35 ESL 800mg)
Group A1860114591

[back to top]

AUC0-t (CBZ) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for CBZ

Reference - Day 28 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg Test - Day 35 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 28 to 35

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t CBZ (D28 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)AUC0-t CBZ (D35 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)
Group B10449494394

[back to top]

Cmax (CBZE) - the Maximum Plasma Concentration

"Reference - Day 28 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg twice-daily Test - Day 35 following twice-daily oral administration of CBZ 400 mg twice-daily~CBZE - carbamazepine-epoxide is the active metabolite of CBZ" (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 28 to 35

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax CBZE (D28 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)Cmax CBZE (D35 CBZ 400 mg twice-daily)
Group B15621560

[back to top]

AUC0-t (BIA 2-093) - Area Under the Curve to Last Measurable Concentration for BIA 2-093

Reference - Day 7 following once-daily oral administration of ESL 800 mg Test - Day 35 following once-daily oral administration of ESL 800 mg (NCT02284854)
Timeframe: Day 7 to 35

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC0-t ESL (D7 ESL 800mg)AUC0-t ESL (D35 ESL 800mg)
Group A276836188648

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time at Which Concentrations Were at or Above the Limit of Quantification

"Reference - MF - marketed formulation Test - TBM - to-be-marketed~BIA 2-005 - BIA 2-093 metabolite" (NCT02284880)
Timeframe: pre-dose then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on each dosing period

,
Interventionng.hr/ml (Mean)
AUC0-t (BIA 2-005 Reference)AUC0-t (BIA 2-005 Test)
400 mg BIA 2-093112568108224
800 mg BIA 2-093279035278734

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Plasma Concentration

Reference - MF - marketed formulation Test - TBM - to-be-marketed BIA 2-005 - BIA 2-093 metabolite (NCT02284880)
Timeframe: pre-dose then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on each dosing period

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Cmax (BIA 2-005 Reference)Cmax (BIA 2-005 Test)
400 mg BIA 2-09364616547
800 mg BIA 2-0931318312988

[back to top]

Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax

"Reference - MF - marketed formulation Test - TBM - to-be-marketed~BIA 2-005 - BIA 2-093 metabolite" (NCT02284880)
Timeframe: pre-dose then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on each dosing period

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Tmax (BIA 2-005 Reference)Tmax (BIA 2-005 Test)
400 mg BIA 2-0932.002.00
800 mg BIA 2-0932.001.75

[back to top]

AUCτ - Steady-state Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile Over 24 h, the Dosing Interval

(NCT02287415)
Timeframe: PHASE A: first 3 days; PHASE B: Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8: pre-dose. PHASE C: Days 1, 3, 5 and 7: pre-dose; Day 8: 24 h post last-warfarin dose.

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Group 1411834

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Steady-state Plasma Concentration

(NCT02287415)
Timeframe: PHASE A: first 3 days; PHASE B: Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8: pre-dose. PHASE C: Days 1, 3, 5 and 7: pre-dose; Day 8: 24 h post last-warfarin dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Group 131652

[back to top]

Tmax - Time of Occurrence of Cmax

(NCT02287415)
Timeframe: PHASE A: first 3 days; PHASE B: Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8: pre-dose. PHASE C: Days 1, 3, 5 and 7: pre-dose; Day 8: 24 h post last-warfarin dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Group 16

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ (BIA 2-005)

AUC0-∞ (BIA 2-005) - the area under the plasma BIA 2-005 concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated from AUC0-t + (Clast/λz), where Clast is the last quantifiable concentration and λz the apparent terminal rate constant; (BIA 2-005 is a BIA 2-093 metabolite) (NCT02288312)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose.

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fasting243808
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fed236089
BIA 2-093 800 mg (2 x 400 mg)244821

[back to top]

Tmax (BIA 2-005)

tmax (BIA 2-005) - the time of occurrence of Cmax of BIA 2-005 (BIA 2-005 is a BIA 2-093 metabolite) (NCT02288312)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fasting2.64
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fed2.75
BIA 2-093 800 mg (2 x 400 mg)2.56

[back to top]

Cmax (BIA 2-005)

Cmax (BIA 2-005) - maximum observed plasma drug concentration of BIA 2-005 (BIA 2-093 metabolite) (NCT02288312)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fasting10973
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fed11044
BIA 2-093 800 mg (2 x 400 mg)11022

[back to top]

AUC0-t (BIA 2-005)

AUC0-t (BIA 2-005) - the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time at which BIA 2-005 concentrations are at or above the limit of quantification, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule (BIA 2-005 is a BIA 2-093 metabolite) (NCT02288312)
Timeframe: pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose.

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fasting241651
BIA 2-093 800 mg Fed234092
BIA 2-093 800 mg (2 x 400 mg)242375

[back to top]

Profile of Mood States (POMS) Score.

"Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they feel a variety of emotions/feelings. The overall score is presented.~Assessments were performed prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each treatment period. Score range: -32 to 200. Lower scores correspond to better mood state." (NCT02912364)
Timeframe: Prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each six-week treatment period.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Non-drug Condition Average8
Eslicarbazepine11
Carbamazepine15

[back to top]

MCG Paragraph Recall Scores.

"Participants were read a paragraph and were asked to recall content immediately following and twenty minutes after hearing the reading. MCG = Medical College of Georgia.~Assessments were performed prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each treatment period. Score range: 0 - 60, higher scores indicate better memory function." (NCT02912364)
Timeframe: Prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each six-week treatment period.

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Immediate RecallDelayed Recall
Carbamazepine3130
Eslicarbazepine3331
Non-drug Condition Average3433

[back to top]

Overall Composite Z Score of Neuropsychological Battery as a Measure of Direct Comparison of the 2 Antiepileptic Drugs.

Z score of cognitive tests at end of each 6-week drug treatment period for each intervention (i.e., Eslicarbazepine and Carbamazepine). The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate poor cognitive performance compared to the mean and positive numbers represent higher cognitive performance compared to the mean. (NCT02912364)
Timeframe: At the end of each 6-week drug treatment period.

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Eslicarbazepine.001
Carbamazepine-.23

[back to top]

Dual Task Percent of Time in Box.

"Participants were asked to use their computer mouse to keep the cursor inside a moving box on the computer screen while simultaneously responding with a button press when a number on the screen exceeded a certain value.~Assessments were performed prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each treatment period." (NCT02912364)
Timeframe: Prior to treatment (non-drug condition average) and at the end of each six-week treatment period.

Interventionpercentage of time in box (Mean)
Non-drug Condition Average62
Eslicarbazepine62
Carbamazepine60

[back to top]

Overall Z-score for Executive Function.

Executive function consists of a composite of measures from the computerized cognitive tests. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate poor cognitive performance compared to the mean and positive numbers represent higher cognitive performance compared to the mean. (NCT02912364)
Timeframe: At the end of each 6-week drug treatment period.

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Eslicarbazepine.22
Carbamazepine-.32

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Completing 24 Weeks Adjunctive Therapy During Maintenance Phase

Phase 4 study of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy in adult subjects with a diagnosis of epilepsy with Partial-onset seizures (POS). Two groups of ESL-naïve subjects will be evaluated (NCT03116828)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of the study drug until the completion of 24 weeks Maintenance Phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Eslicarbazepine Acetate (Arm 1)36
Eslicarbazepine Acetate (Arm 2)37

[back to top]