Page last updated: 2024-11-12

lisdexamfetamine dimesylate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: A dextroamphetamine drug precursor that also functions as a CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANT and DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITOR and is used in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID11597697
CHEMBL ID1201178
SCHEMBL ID678421
MeSH IDM0502623

Synonyms (55)

Synonym
vyvanse (tn)
lisdexamfetamine mesilate (jan)
elvanse (tn)
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (usan)
608137-33-3
D04747
nrp-104
l-lysine-d-amphetamine dimesylate
lys-amp
spd-489
venvanse
lys-d-amp
lisdexamfetamine mesilate
vyvanse
nrp 104
lisdexamfetamine mesylate
lis-dexamfetamine dimesylate
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate
lisdexamphetamine dimesilate
CHEMBL1201178
lisdexamfetamine dimethanesulfonate
tyvense
spd489
lisdexamfetamine dimesilate
nrp104
(2s)-2,6-diamino-n-[(1s)-1-methyl-2-phenylethyl]hexanamide dimethanesulfonate
sjt761gegs ,
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate [usan]
unii-sjt761gegs
spd 489
ldx
hexanamide, 2,6-diamino-n-((1s)-1-methyl-2-phenylethyl), (2s), dimethanesulfonate
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate [vandf]
lisdexamfetamine mesilate [mart.]
lisdexamfetamine mesilate [jan]
lisdexamfetamine dimethanesulfonate [mi]
(2s)-2,6-diamino-n-((1s)-1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)hexanamide dimethanesulphonate
hexanamide, 2,6-diamino-n-((1s)-1-methyl-2-phenylethyl), (2s), dimethanesulphonate
lisdexamfetamine mesilate [who-dd]
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate [orange book]
CETWSOHVEGTIBR-FORAGAHYSA-N
SCHEMBL678421
DTXSID60209653 ,
dimesylate, lis-dexamfetamine
lis dexamfetamine dimesylate
dimesylate, lisdexamfetamine
AKOS030254940
ldx;lisdexamfetamine mesilate;lisdexamfetamine mesylate;nrp 104;nrp-104;spd 489
BCP24044
(2s)-2,6-diamino-n-[(2s)-1-phenylpropan-2-yl]hexanamide;methanesulfonic acid
Q27289243
dtxcid10132144
lisdexamfetamine mesilate (mart.)
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate capsules
(2s)-2,6-diamino-n-((1s)-1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)hexanamide dimethanesulfonate

Research Excerpts

Overview

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a stimulant prodrug with low abuse and diversion potential. It is used in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults. Lisdexa is a novel prodrug approved in North America, Europe and Brazil for treating ADHD.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug approved for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and for moderate-to-severe binge eating disorder in adults in some countries."( What is the potential for abuse of lisdexamfetamine in adults? A preclinical and clinical literature review and expert opinion.
Batisse, A; Carton, L; Dematteis, M; Icick, R; Kammerer, E; Rolland, B; Weibel, S, 2022
)
2.16
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a stimulant prodrug with low abuse and diversion potential that is used in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults. "( Review of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Didenko, E; Maw, K; Meleshkina, D; Najib, J; Ramnarain, J; Tabassum, M; Yusupov, K, 2020
)
2.4
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting prodrug stimulant for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). "( Efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and recent methylphenidate use.
Adeyi, B; Babcock, T; Burtea, T; Dirks, B; Duncan, D; Jain, R; Lasser, R; Renna, J; Scheckner, B, 2013
)
2.14
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting, prodrug stimulant therapy for patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). "( Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate throughout the day in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a randomized, controlled trial.
Banaschewski, T; Bloomfield, R; Civil, R; Coghill, DR; Dittmann, RW; Lecendreux, M; Otero, IH; Squires, LA; Zuddas, A, 2014
)
2.22
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a novel prodrug approved in North America, Europe and Brazil for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). "( Differences in the neurochemical and behavioural profiles of lisdexamfetamine methylphenidate and modafinil revealed by simultaneous dual-probe microdialysis and locomotor activity measurements in freely-moving rats.
Brammer, RJ; Gosden, J; Hackett, D; Heal, DJ; Kulkarni, RS; Rowley, HL, 2014
)
1.85
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a novel pro-drug of d-amphetamine that is currently used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children aged ≥ 6 years and adults. "( Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacology and toxicology of lisdexamfetamine: a novel d-amphetamine pro-drug.
Hutson, PH; Pennick, M; Secker, R, 2014
)
1.85
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting oral prodrug stimulant. "( The use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for the treatment of ADHD and other psychiatric disorders.
Álvarez, FJ; Roncero, C, 2014
)
2.23
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a new drug for the treatment of ADHD."( Expert recommendation: contributions to clinical practice of the new prodrug lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Alda, JA; Cardo-Jalón, EC; Eddy-Ives, LS; Fernández-Jaén, A; Fernández-Pérez, M; Hernández-Otero, I; Hervás, A; Hidalgo-Vicario, MI; Quintero, J; Ramos-Quiroga, JA; Sánchez, J; Sans-Fitó, A; Soutullo, C, 2014
)
1.35
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults. "( Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy.
Ermer, JC; Frick, G; Pennick, M, 2016
)
3.32
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive molecule."( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: the first long-acting prodrug stimulant treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Faraone, SV, 2008
)
2.51
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a once-daily medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children (aged 6-12 years) and adults."( The efficacy and safety profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adults.
Najib, J, 2009
)
2.07
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a long-acting amfetamine prodrug that requires in vivo hydrolysis to gradually release active d-amfetamine. "( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults.
Siddiqui, MA; Weber, J, 2009
)
3.24
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting oral prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children 6 to 12 years old and in adults. "( Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover
Boellner, SW; Krishnan, S; Stark, JG; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
2.13
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug stimulant approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and children 6-12 years of age. "( Assessing effects of treatment with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for pediatric ADHD using a parental survey.
Antonucci, D; Kerney, DL; Kunins, C; López, FA; Manos, M, 2010
)
2.08
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is an inactive, water-soluble prodrug in which d-amphetamine is bonded to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid."( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a prodrug stimulant for the treatment of ADHD in children and adults.
Mattingly, G, 2010
)
2.52
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting amphetamine prodrug indicated for the treatment of ADHD and has been shown to be effective in children, adolescents and adults."( The use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for the treatment of ADHD.
Childress, AC; Sallee, FR, 2012
)
1.49
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a D-amphetamine prodrug currently approved for attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder with the potential to be better tolerated due to its prolonged clinical effect."( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate improves processing speed and memory in cognitively impaired MS patients: a phase II study.
Benedict, RH; Cookfair, D; Morrow, SA; Patrick, K; Smerbeck, A; Weinstock-Guttman, B, 2013
)
2.55
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug that requires conversion to d-amphetamine (d-AMPH) for bioactivity. "( Effects of lithium on oxidative stress and behavioral alterations induced by lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: relevance as an animal model of mania.
Araújo, MM; Carvalho, AF; Cordeiro, RC; de Lucena, DF; Hyphantis, TN; Macêdo, DS; McIntyre, RS; Queiroz, AI; Quevedo, J; Sousa, FC; Vasconcelos, SM, 2013
)
2.06
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid. "( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study.
Biederman, J; Boellner, SW; Childress, A; Krishnan, S; Lopez, FA; Zhang, Y, 2007
)
3.23
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a d-amphetamine prodrug developed for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. "( Toxicity profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in three independent rat toxicology studies.
Krishnan, S; Montcrief, S, 2007
)
2.11

Treatment

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment for 2 years was not associated with deterioration of cognitive function in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment duration was not associated with change in BMI percentile, and the medication was well tolerated."( Lisdexamfetamine in Pediatric Binge Eating Disorder: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Blom, TJ; Casuto, LL; Cummings, T; Guerdjikova, AI; Matthews, A; McElroy, SL; Mori, N,
)
0.85
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment for 2 years was not associated with deterioration of cognitive function in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. "( Cognitive Function of Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a 2-Year Open-Label Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate.
Banaschewski, T; Bliss, C; Coghill, DR; Robertson, B; Zuddas, A, 2018
)
2.13

Toxicity

2% (53/88) receiving lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event. The most frequent with lisdExam Fetamine dinesylate being dry mouth and headache (both 11%)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Most adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred during the first 4 weeks."( Long-term effectiveness and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Childress, AC; Findling, RL; Krishnan, S; McGough, JJ, 2008
)
0.62
" Adverse events were generally mild and included dry mouth, decreased appetite, and insomnia."( Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Adler, LA; Biederman, J; Goodman, DW; Kollins, SH; Krishnan, S; Weisler, RH; Zhang, Y, 2008
)
0.58
" The most common adverse events reported with LDX were typical of amphetamine products and included decreased appetite, insomnia, upper abdominal pain, headache, irritability, weight loss, and nausea."( The efficacy and safety profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adults.
Najib, J, 2009
)
0.63
" Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms."( Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an open-label, dose-optimization study.
Findling, RL; Gao, J; Ginsberg, LD; Jain, R, 2009
)
0.62
" Safety assessments included adverse events inquiries, vital signs, and electrocardiograms while the primary effectiveness assessment was the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) total score."( Long-term safety and effectiveness of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder.
Adler, L; Gao, J; Mattingly, G; Squires, L; Weisler, R; Young, J, 2009
)
0.62
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were upper respiratory tract infection (21."( Long-term safety and effectiveness of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder.
Adler, L; Gao, J; Mattingly, G; Squires, L; Weisler, R; Young, J, 2009
)
0.62
" Safety assessments included adverse events."( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: linear dose-proportionality, low intersubject and intrasubject variability, and safety in an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers.
Buckwalter, M; Ermer, J; Homolka, R; Martin, P; Purkayastha, J; Roesch, B, 2010
)
1.8
" Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms."( Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: novel findings using a simulated adult workplace environment design.
Brams, M; Gao, J; Gasior, M; Giblin, J; Squires, L; Wigal, T, 2010
)
0.58
" Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, laboratory findings, physical examinations, and ECG."( Efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Childress, AC; Cutler, AJ; Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Findling, RL; Gasior, M; Hamdani, M; Squires, L, 2011
)
0.68
" Self-report rating scales of functioning and direct assessment of ADHD symptoms, verbal learning/memory, and adverse side effects were collected (baseline only for control students)."( Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in college students with ADHD.
Carson, KM; Dupaul, GJ; O'Dell, SM; Rossi, JS; Swentosky, A; Verdi, G; Vilardo, BA; Weyandt, LL, 2012
)
0.61
"To evaluate the type, frequency, duration, and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of the prodrug lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children with and without previous exposure to stimulant medication in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)."( Adverse events in medication treatment-naïve children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a small, controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Jun, A; Lerner, MA; Stehli, A; Steinberg-Epstein, R; Wigal, SB; Wong, AA, 2012
)
0.79
" Safety was assessed using adverse effects and LDX levels."( Adverse events in medication treatment-naïve children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a small, controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Jun, A; Lerner, MA; Stehli, A; Steinberg-Epstein, R; Wigal, SB; Wong, AA, 2012
)
0.58
"LDX reduced the core symptoms of ADHD with more severe adverse events in stimulant-naïve than previous-exposure subjects."( Adverse events in medication treatment-naïve children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a small, controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Jun, A; Lerner, MA; Stehli, A; Steinberg-Epstein, R; Wigal, SB; Wong, AA, 2012
)
0.58
" While medications for ADHD are generally well-tolerated, there are common, although less severe, as well as rare but severe adverse events AEs during treatment with ADHD drugs."( Practitioner review: current best practice in the management of adverse events during treatment with ADHD medications in children and adolescents.
Banaschewski, T; Buitelaar, J; Coghill, D; Cortese, S; Danckaerts, M; Dittmann, RW; Graham, J; Holtmann, M; Sergeant, J; Taylor, E, 2013
)
0.39
" Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, laboratory findings, and electrocardiograms."( A long-term open-label safety and effectiveness trial of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Childress, AC; Cutler, AJ; Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Findling, RL; Gasior, M; Hamdani, M; Saylor, K, 2013
)
0.64
" Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), height and weight, vital signs and electrocardiogram parameters."( Efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and atomoxetine in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, phase IIIb study.
Anderson, CS; Bloomfield, R; Caballero, B; Cardo, E; Civil, R; Coghill, D; Dittmann, RW; Higgins, N; Hodgkins, P; Lyne, A; Nagy, P, 2013
)
0.7
"2% (53/88) receiving lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, the most frequent with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate being dry mouth and headache (both 11."( A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate as augmentation therapy in adults with residual symptoms of major depressive disorder after treatment with escitalopram.
Cutler, AJ; Gao, J; Geibel, BB; Lasser, R; Patkar, AA; Richards, C; Sambunaris, A; Trivedi, MH, 2013
)
0.95
"In short-term, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase III trials, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in children, adolescents, and adults receiving LDX were typical for those reported for stimulants in general."( A systematic review of the safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Caballero, B; Civil, R; Coghill, DR; Sorooshian, S, 2014
)
0.68
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported by 4 participants receiving placebo and by 23 participants receiving LDX (all doses) with no serious AEs while on active treatment."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with clinically stable schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ascending multiple doses.
Corcoran, M; Dirks, B; Ermer, J; Gertsik, L; Martin, P; Raychaudhuri, A; Stevenson, A; Walling, D, 2014
)
0.69
" Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, and change in weight."( Efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine for treatment of adults with moderate to severe binge-eating disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Gao, J; Gasior, M; Hudson, JI; Jonas, J; McElroy, SL; Mitchell, JE; Wang, J; Whitaker, T; Wilfley, D, 2015
)
0.42
" The incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events was 58."( Efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine for treatment of adults with moderate to severe binge-eating disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Gao, J; Gasior, M; Hudson, JI; Jonas, J; McElroy, SL; Mitchell, JE; Wang, J; Whitaker, T; Wilfley, D, 2015
)
0.42
" Discontinuation rates because of adverse events (AEs) were low; NNH for discontinuation because of an AE for LDX vs."( Lisdexamfetamine for binge eating disorder in adults: a systematic review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved indication - what is the number needed to treat, number needed to harm and likelihood to be helped or harmed?
Citrome, L, 2015
)
0.42
" Pharmacotherapy plays a main role in multimodal treatment, albeit adverse effects are a concern."( Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Darling, L; Hansen, MV; Holst, H, 2015
)
0.42
"The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients receiving lisdexamfetamine in a clinical setting."( Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Darling, L; Hansen, MV; Holst, H, 2015
)
0.42
" Withdrawals due to all-cause, adverse effects and lack of efficacy were defined as primary outcomes evaluating the safety of such medications."( An Evaluation on the Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: a Comparison of Multiple Treatments.
Gao, J; He, S; Li, Y; Wang, Q; Zhang, Y, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety evaluations included the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital sign and weight assessments, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale responses."( A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, 12-Month Extension Safety and Tolerability Trial of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With Binge Eating Disorder.
Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Gasior, M; Hudson, J; McElroy, SL; Quintero, J; Radewonuk, J, 2017
)
0.68
" Treatment-emergent adverse events reported in greater than or equal to 10% of participants were dry mouth (27."( A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, 12-Month Extension Safety and Tolerability Trial of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With Binge Eating Disorder.
Ferreira-Cornwell, MC; Gasior, M; Hudson, J; McElroy, SL; Quintero, J; Radewonuk, J, 2017
)
0.68
" Safety monitoring included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, electrocardiography, and growth."( Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Phase IV, 2-Year, Open-Label Study in Europe.
Banaschewski, T; Caballero, B; Coghill, DR; Nagy, P; Otero, IH; Soutullo, C; Yan, B; Zuddas, A, 2017
)
0.74
"Fluoxetine for BN and lisdexamfetamine for BED are relatively safe and well-tolerated."( Safety of pharmacotherapy options for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder.
Bello, NT; Yeomans, BL, 2018
)
0.48
" Safety and tolerability assessments included the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events and vital sign changes."( A 12-Month Open-Label Extension Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Major Depressive Disorder in Adults.
Brawman-Mintzer, O; Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Gu, J; Iosifescu, DV; Madhoo, M; Mago, R; McIntyre, RS; Richards, C; Sarkis, E; Weisler, R, 2018
)
0.71
"1% [189/1559]) were the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events."( A 12-Month Open-Label Extension Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Major Depressive Disorder in Adults.
Brawman-Mintzer, O; Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Gu, J; Iosifescu, DV; Madhoo, M; Mago, R; McIntyre, RS; Richards, C; Sarkis, E; Weisler, R, 2018
)
0.71
" These may also be triggered by drugs and appear as adverse drug reactions (ADRs)."( Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Mood and Emotion in Pediatric Patients Treated for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Comparative Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
Carnovale, C; Clementi, E; Gentili, M; Mazhar, F; Nobile, M; Peeters, GGAM; Pozzi, M; Radice, S,
)
0.13
"We mined data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pharmacovigilance database, focused on methylphenidate, atomoxetine, amphetamine, lisdexamfetamine, and their derivatives."( Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Mood and Emotion in Pediatric Patients Treated for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Comparative Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
Carnovale, C; Clementi, E; Gentili, M; Mazhar, F; Nobile, M; Peeters, GGAM; Pozzi, M; Radice, S,
)
0.13
"We conclude that real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System are consistent with previous evidence from meta-analyses."( Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Mood and Emotion in Pediatric Patients Treated for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Comparative Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
Carnovale, C; Clementi, E; Gentili, M; Mazhar, F; Nobile, M; Peeters, GGAM; Pozzi, M; Radice, S,
)
0.13
" Lisdexamfetamine was generally well tolerated by both ethnic groups, with no serious adverse events reported."( A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese and Caucasian healthy adult subjects.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Martin, P; Matsuo, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profile of lisdexamfetamine and were similar in both ethnic groups."( A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese and Caucasian healthy adult subjects.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Martin, P; Matsuo, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" Two participants withdrew from the trial in the first week: one relocated away from the study site, the other self-withdrew due to a possible, known side effect of LDX (agitation)."( Safety and tolerability of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence: a phase-2 dose-escalation study.
Bruno, R; Carr, A; Clifford, B; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Lintzeris, N; Liu, Z; Siefried, KJ, 2021
)
0.62
"LDX at a dose of up to 250 mg/day was safe and well tolerated by study participants, warranting larger trials as a pharmacotherapy for MA dependence."( Safety and tolerability of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence: a phase-2 dose-escalation study.
Bruno, R; Carr, A; Clifford, B; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Lintzeris, N; Liu, Z; Siefried, KJ, 2021
)
0.62
" Safety and tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in pulse and blood pressure (BP)."( Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Preschool Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Childress, AC; Findling, RL; Gunawardhana, L; Jacobsen, L; Johnson, SA; Lloyd, E, 2022
)
0.72
" Safety was the number of adverse events (AEs) by system organ class."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
" There were no treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs)."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
"A tapering dose regimen of lisdexamfetamine was safe and feasible for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal in an inpatient setting."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
" Key safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest (i."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nivasorexant in adults with binge-eating disorder: A randomized, Phase II proof of concept trial.
Berger, B; Coloma, PM; Guerdjikova, AI; Joyce, JM; Liebowitz, MR; McElroy, SL; Pain, S; Rabasa, C, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between GXR and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX, Vyvanse®; Shire US LLC, Wayne, PA, USA) has not been thoroughly evaluated.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Descriptive statistics were used for pharmacokinetic parameters."( Multiple daily-dose pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy adult volunteers.
Krishnan, SM; Stark, JG, 2008
)
0.61
" Blood samples were collected predose and 0 to 96 hours postdose for pharmacokinetic analysis."( Effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts in adults.
Buckwalter, M; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Homolka, R; Lasseter, KC; Martin, P; Zhang, P, 2009
)
0.6
" h/mL, for Cmax and AUCinf, respectively."( Effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts in adults.
Buckwalter, M; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Homolka, R; Lasseter, KC; Martin, P; Zhang, P, 2009
)
0.6
" However, approximately 50% of subjects receiving MAS XR showed an earlier Tmax while on omeprazole, indicating unpredictable release of active drug by the second bead of MAS XR, most likely related to reduced stomach acid while on a PPI compromising the pulsed delivery of MAS XR."( Effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts in adults.
Buckwalter, M; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Homolka, R; Lasseter, KC; Martin, P; Zhang, P, 2009
)
0.6
" Dose-proportionality and intersubject and intrasubject variability of pharmacokinetic parameters were examined."( Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: linear dose-proportionality, low intersubject and intrasubject variability, and safety in an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers.
Buckwalter, M; Ermer, J; Homolka, R; Martin, P; Purkayastha, J; Roesch, B, 2010
)
1.8
" Information on the pharmacokinetic profile of LDX in children with ADHD is lacking."( Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover
Boellner, SW; Krishnan, S; Stark, JG; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
0.68
"The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine delivery from LDX, and intact LDX with increasing doses of LDX administered in children with ADHD."( Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover
Boellner, SW; Krishnan, S; Stark, JG; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
0.68
" The pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine and intact LDX were calculated over 48 hours."( Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover
Boellner, SW; Krishnan, S; Stark, JG; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
0.68
"Data on pharmacokinetic parameters of the prodrug stimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate via alternate routes of administration are limited."( Intranasal versus oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover, single-dose, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult men.
Buckwalter, M; Dennis, K; Diehl, B; Doll, WJ; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Martin, PT; Page, RC; Sandefer, EP, 2011
)
0.88
" Mean ± SD elimination half-life (t(1/2)) values were also similar for PO (11."( Intranasal versus oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover, single-dose, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult men.
Buckwalter, M; Dennis, K; Diehl, B; Doll, WJ; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Martin, PT; Page, RC; Sandefer, EP, 2011
)
0.64
" Subject variability for d-amphetamine pharmacokinetic parameters was low."( Intranasal versus oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover, single-dose, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult men.
Buckwalter, M; Dennis, K; Diehl, B; Doll, WJ; Ermer, JC; Haffey, MB; Martin, PT; Page, RC; Sandefer, EP, 2011
)
0.64
"Among 80 enrolled subjects, 77 were included in pharmacokinetic and safety analyses."( An open-label investigation of the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and venlafaxine extended-release, administered alone and in combination, in healthy adults.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Haffey, MB; Harlin, B; Lasseter, K; Martin, P; Purkayastha, J; Richards, C; Roesch, B, 2013
)
0.63
" However, the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between GXR and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX, Vyvanse®; Shire US LLC, Wayne, PA, USA) has not been thoroughly evaluated."( Pharmacokinetics of coadministered guanfacine extended release and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Corcoran, ME; Ermer, J; Fetterolf, J; Haffey, M; Martin, P; Preston, P; Purkayastha, J; Roesch, B; Wang, P, 2013
)
0.85
" Following administration of LDX alone or in combination with GXR, the statistical comparisons of the AUC0-∞ and Cmax of d-amphetamine fell entirely within the reference interval."( Pharmacokinetics of coadministered guanfacine extended release and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Corcoran, ME; Ermer, J; Fetterolf, J; Haffey, M; Martin, P; Preston, P; Purkayastha, J; Roesch, B; Wang, P, 2013
)
0.63
"In healthy adults, coadministration of GXR and LDX did not result in a clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic DDI compared with either treatment alone."( Pharmacokinetics of coadministered guanfacine extended release and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Corcoran, ME; Ermer, J; Fetterolf, J; Haffey, M; Martin, P; Preston, P; Purkayastha, J; Roesch, B; Wang, P, 2013
)
0.63
" Furthermore, unlike d-amphetamine, the pharmacodynamic effects of LDX are independent of the route of administration underlining the requirement to be hydrolyzed by contact with red blood cells."( Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacology and toxicology of lisdexamfetamine: a novel d-amphetamine pro-drug.
Hutson, PH; Pennick, M; Secker, R, 2014
)
0.4
" Consistent with previous studies, pharmacokinetic parameters increased linearly with increasing LDX dose."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with clinically stable schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ascending multiple doses.
Corcoran, M; Dirks, B; Ermer, J; Gertsik, L; Martin, P; Raychaudhuri, A; Stevenson, A; Walling, D, 2014
)
0.69
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and serially for 72 h post-dose."( Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Effects on the Pharmacokinetics of Cytochrome P450 Substrates in Healthy Adults in an Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Martin, P, 2015
)
1.86
" Pharmacokinetic end points included maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) or to last assessment (AUClast)."( A Single-Dose, Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Individuals With Normal and Impaired Renal Function.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Lasseter, K; Marbury, T; Martin, PT; Yan, B, 2016
)
0.66
"Mean LDX Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-∞ in participants with mild to severe renal impairment did not differ from those with normal renal function; participants with ESRD had higher mean Cmax and AUClast than those with normal renal function."( A Single-Dose, Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Individuals With Normal and Impaired Renal Function.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Lasseter, K; Marbury, T; Martin, PT; Yan, B, 2016
)
0.66
" Due to the specific pharmacokinetics of the long-acting stimulants, this article revises the pharmacokinetic studies on LDX, the newest amphetamine pro-drug."( Lisdexamfetamine: A pharmacokinetic review.
Comiran, E; Fröehlich, PE; Kessler, FH; Limberger, RP, 2016
)
0.43
" Clinical effects of LDX in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been shown to persist up to 14 hours; however, pharmacokinetic (PK) data of LDX and amphetamine in ADHD adults are not currently available."( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Lisdexamfetamine in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Adler, LA; Alperin, S; Faraone, SV; Leon, T, 2017
)
0.46
" pharmacodynamic [PD])."( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Lisdexamfetamine in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Adler, LA; Alperin, S; Faraone, SV; Leon, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Pharmacokinetic parameters for lisdexamfetamine and d-amphetamine were estimated by noncompartmental analysis."( A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese and Caucasian healthy adult subjects.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Martin, P; Matsuo, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" The purposes of this study were constructing a population pharmacokinetic model of d-amphetamine after dosing of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and assessing influential factors on the pharmacokinetics of d-amphetamine in Japanese pediatric patients with ADHD."( Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of d-amphetamine after administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese pediatric ADHD patients.
Matsumoto, S; Matsuo, Y; Tsuda, Y; Wajima, T, 2020
)
0.99
" Oral fluid and blood samples were collected for up to 72 h and urine for up to 120 h post-drug administration for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of intact LDX and d-AMPH."( Lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid, plasma, and urine after controlled oral administration of lisdexamfetamine.
Barreto, F; Carlos, G; Comiran, E; Fröehlich, PE; Limberger, RP; Pechanksy, F, 2021
)
0.62
" Viloxazine extended-release: Cmax = 95."( Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Viloxazine Extended-Release (SPN-812) and Lisdexamfetamine in Healthy Adults.
Adewole, T; Faison, SL; Fry, N; Maletic, V; Nasser, A; Odebo, O; Wang, Z,
)
0.13
"The objective of this research was to characterize the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on the pharmacokinetic properties of the pro-drug lisdexamfetamine and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine."( Lisdexamfetamine Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Nonsurgical Controls.
Elmquist, WF; Erickson, AL; Mitchell, JE; Mohammad, AS; Nelson, C; Orcutt, M; Roerig, JL; Steffen, KJ; Zhang, W, 2021
)
0.62
" Noncompartmental analyses were used to compare pharmacokinetic measures between groups."( Lisdexamfetamine Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Nonsurgical Controls.
Elmquist, WF; Erickson, AL; Mitchell, JE; Mohammad, AS; Nelson, C; Orcutt, M; Roerig, JL; Steffen, KJ; Zhang, W, 2021
)
0.62

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" In the present study, we have examined the effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), an amphetamine pro-drug that is approved for the treatment of ADHD on acetylcholine and histamine efflux in pre-frontal cortex and hippocampus alone and in combination with the anti-depressant s-citalopram."( Effects of lisdexamfetamine alone and in combination with s-citalopram on acetylcholine and histamine efflux in the rat pre-frontal cortex and ventral hippocampus.
Folgering, JH; Heins, MS; Hutson, PH, 2015
)
0.67

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The relative bioavailability of oral lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, and active d-amphetamine was assessed in an open-label, single-dose, 3-treatment, 3-period, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy adult volunteers."( Relative bioavailability of lisdexamfetamine 70-mg capsules in fasted and fed healthy adult volunteers and in solution: a single-dose, crossover pharmacokinetic study.
Krishnan, S; Zhang, Y, 2008
)
0.62
" The intestinal absorption rate for each drug was acquired by deconvolution, using historical intravenous data as reference, and used with the intestinal surface area and the dose remaining in the lumen to estimate the Peff."( Human in vivo regional intestinal permeability: quantitation using site-specific drug absorption data.
Dahlgren, D; Lennernäs, H; Roos, C; Sjögren, E, 2015
)
0.42
"Relative bioavailability of D-amphetamine (the active moiety) did not differ across administrations, which suggests that emptying an LDX capsule into orange juice or yogurt and consuming it is an alternative to intact capsules."( Relative Bioavailabilities of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and D-Amphetamine in Healthy Adults in an Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study After Mixing Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate With Food or Drink.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Lasseter, K; Martin, PT, 2016
)
0.72

Dosage Studied

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated dose-response relationships of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate when used as augmentation for major depressive disorder in individuals exhibiting inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" In a 7-day repeat-dose study, all rats dosed with LDX (14 per dose group for each sex) showed increased activity; 10 male rats and 11 female rats at 300 mg/kg/day and 3 female rats at 100 mg/kg/day were euthanized because of self-mutilation and 1 male rat at 300 mg/kg/day was found dead."( Toxicity profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in three independent rat toxicology studies.
Krishnan, S; Montcrief, S, 2007
)
0.66
" The unique pharmacokinetic profile owing to lisdexamfetamine's prodrug design and rate-limited enzymatic biotransformation allows for once-daily dosing with a duration of activity of approximately 12 hours."( Lisdexamfetamine for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Cowles, BJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The recommended starting dosage of lisdexamfetamine is 30 mg orally daily, which can be adjusted to a maximum dosage of 70 mg daily."( Lisdexamfetamine: a prodrug for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Bhattacharya, P; Popovic, B; Sivaswamy, L, 2009
)
0.35
" Dexmethylphenidate XR is a stimulant treatment in a single isomer form, and has an efficacy and tolerability similar to two doses of immediate-release (IR) dexmethylphenidate when taken 4 hours apart, but is dosed at half of the usual d,l-methylphenidate dose."( Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: recent advances in paediatric pharmacotherapy.
Kratochvil, CJ; May, DE, 2010
)
0.36
"To explore dose-response effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) treatment for ADHD."( Dose response effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment in adults with ADHD: an exploratory study.
Faraone, SV; Glatt, SJ; Goodman, D; Kollins, SH; Spencer, TJ, 2012
)
0.96
"For LDX doses between 30 and 70 mg/d, the dose-response efficacy effect for LDX is not affected by prior pharmacotherapy, but patients with a greater severity of illness may benefit more from higher doses, especially for hyperactive-impulsive symptoms."( Dose response effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment in adults with ADHD: an exploratory study.
Faraone, SV; Glatt, SJ; Goodman, D; Kollins, SH; Spencer, TJ, 2012
)
0.68
" To evaluate the efficacy of LDX throughout the day, symptoms and behaviors of ADHD were evaluated using an abbreviated version of the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised (CPRS-R) at 1000, 1400 and 1800 hours following early morning dosing (0700 hours)."( Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate throughout the day in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a randomized, controlled trial.
Banaschewski, T; Bloomfield, R; Civil, R; Coghill, DR; Dittmann, RW; Lecendreux, M; Otero, IH; Squires, LA; Zuddas, A, 2014
)
0.78
"To compare therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients initiated on lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs other once-daily Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stimulants."( Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults.
Cloutier, M; Erder, MH; Gauthier, G; Guérin, A; Hodgkins, P; Setyawan, J; Wu, E, 2013
)
0.39
" Therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen were compared between treatment groups using multivariate logistic regression models."( Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults.
Cloutier, M; Erder, MH; Gauthier, G; Guérin, A; Hodgkins, P; Setyawan, J; Wu, E, 2013
)
0.39
"Overall, compared to LDX-treated patients, patients initiated on other ADHD medications were equally or more likely to have a therapy augmentation and more likely to deviate from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen."( Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults.
Cloutier, M; Erder, MH; Gauthier, G; Guérin, A; Hodgkins, P; Setyawan, J; Wu, E, 2013
)
0.39
" All subjects were initiated at 30 mg/day of adjunctive LDX for the first week with flexible dosing (i."( The effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on body weight, metabolic parameters, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptomatology in adults with bipolar I/II disorder.
Almagor, D; Alsuwaidan, M; Bilkey, TS; Cha, DS; Gallaugher, LA; Kennedy, SH; McIntyre, RS; Powell, AM; Soczynska, JK; Szpindel, I; Woldeyohannes, HO, 2013
)
0.75
" The dosage of lisdexamfetamine was 30 to 70 mg/day."( Exploratory meta-analysis on lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in adult ADHD.
Maneeton, B; Maneeton, N; Martin, SD; Reungyos, J; Srisurapanont, M; Suttajit, S, 2014
)
0.4
" The dosage of LDX was 30 to 70 mg/day."( Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine in child and adolescent ADHD: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Likhitsathian, S; Maneeton, B; Maneeton, N; Narkpongphun, A; Srisurapanont, M; Suttajit, S; Woottiluk, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Our LDX dosing regimen yielded blood levels of dextroamphetamine comparable to those documented in patients."( Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging reveals striatal hypertrophy in a rat model of long-term stimulant treatment.
Bansal, R; Biezonski, D; Cha, J; Duan, Y; Gerum, S; Guilfoyle, DN; Hrabe, J; Kellendonk, C; Krivko, A; Leventhal, BL; Peterson, BS; Posner, J; Shah, R; Xie, S, 2016
)
0.43
"This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated dose-response relationships of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate when used as augmentation for major depressive disorder in individuals exhibiting inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder in adults with inadequate response to antidepressant therapy.
Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Iosifescu, DV; Mago, R; Reynolds, J; Richards, C; Sarkis, E, 2017
)
0.91
"For Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change, no significant dose-responses were observed for any candidate dose-response curve (all p>0."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder in adults with inadequate response to antidepressant therapy.
Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Iosifescu, DV; Mago, R; Reynolds, J; Richards, C; Sarkis, E, 2017
)
0.69
" However, further studies are needed to provide more robust evidence on efficacy, dosage and safety for this population."( Amphetamine Use in the Elderly: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Colpo, GD; John, V; Rocha, NP; Sassi, KLM; Teixeira, AL, 2020
)
0.56
" Mean area under the concentration-time curves for d-amphetamine were higher (by 11%-15%) in Japanese than Caucasian subjects following multiple dosing of lisdexamfetamine."( A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese and Caucasian healthy adult subjects.
Corcoran, M; Ermer, J; Martin, P; Matsuo, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" The purposes of this study were constructing a population pharmacokinetic model of d-amphetamine after dosing of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and assessing influential factors on the pharmacokinetics of d-amphetamine in Japanese pediatric patients with ADHD."( Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of d-amphetamine after administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in Japanese pediatric ADHD patients.
Matsumoto, S; Matsuo, Y; Tsuda, Y; Wajima, T, 2020
)
0.99
"These data suggest that there is no need to routinely adjust lisdexamfetamine dosing following RYGB."( Lisdexamfetamine Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Nonsurgical Controls.
Elmquist, WF; Erickson, AL; Mitchell, JE; Mohammad, AS; Nelson, C; Orcutt, M; Roerig, JL; Steffen, KJ; Zhang, W, 2021
)
0.62
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (319)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's33 (10.34)29.6817
2010's222 (69.59)24.3611
2020's64 (20.06)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 68.79

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index68.79 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.12 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.21 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index117.58 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (68.79)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials125 (37.88%)5.53%
Reviews67 (20.30%)6.00%
Case Studies24 (7.27%)4.05%
Observational5 (1.52%)0.25%
Other109 (33.03%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (109)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Low- and High-dose Range Groups of SPD489 as Adjunctive Treatment to Established Maintenance Doses of Antipsych [NCT01234298]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-27Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was discontinued due to non-safety related business prioritization decisions)
[NCT01263548]45 participants (Actual)Observational2010-10-31Completed
Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacokinetics Lisdexamphetamine: BAR-MEDS Lisdexamphetamine [NCT03497169]12 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-11-02Recruiting
Lisdexamfetamine in Binge Eating Disorder of Moderate or Greater Severity [NCT01090713]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [NCT03446885]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Completed
Efficacy of Careful Medication and Tailored Case Management Follow up Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [NCT02142140]326 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Active, not recruiting
[NCT02034201]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
A Multi-Center, Open Label, Evaluation of the Effect and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Children Aged 6-12 With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder [NCT03337646]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase 4, Open-Label, Multicentre, Safety Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT01328756]Phase 4314 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-07Completed
[NCT02144415]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Adjunctive Lisdexamfetamine in Bipolar Depression [NCT01131559]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor halted study.)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Fixed-Dose Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 Compared With Placebo in Preschool Children Aged 4-5 Years With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [NCT03260205]Phase 3199 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-06Completed
A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of SPD489 on Executive Function (Self-Regulation) Behaviors in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Report [NCT01101022]Phase 4161 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-19Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Forced-dose Titration Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Binge Eating Disorder [NCT01291173]Phase 2271 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-10Completed
Psychostimulant Treatment of TBI-Related Attention Deficits: fMRI Analysis of Neural Mechanisms of Response [NCT01000064]Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to unable to meet recruitment goals)
Vyvanse and Glucose Intolerance in Children With ADHD and Obesity [NCT01017263]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Due very high screen fail rate, pre study feasibility not consistent with screened population.)
The Reinforcing Mechanisms of Smoking in Adult ADHD [NCT00573859]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Cognitive-Behavioral and Pharmacologic (LDX) Treatment of Binge-Eating Disorder and Obesity [NCT03924193]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-25Active, not recruiting
Multi-Modal Imaging of Psychostimulant Effects on Executive Function Post-RRSO [NCT03187353]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-22Completed
Adjunctive Lisdexamfetamine in Bipolar Depression [NCT01093963]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment goals not met)
A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized, Four Period Crossover Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of VYVANSE™ and ADDERALL XR When Each is Administered Alone and in Combination With the Proton Pump Inhibitor Prilosec OTC™ in Healthy [NCT00746733]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-08Completed
Treatments for Fathers With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Their At-Risk Children (Fathers Too) [NCT02675400]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Endocrine and Emotional Effects of Lisdexamfetamine and d- Amphetamine: a Placebo-controlled Study in Healthy Subjects (LisDexStudy) [NCT02668926]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Effect of Lisdexamfetamine on Prefrontal Brain Dysfunction in Binge Eating Disorder [NCT02659488]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Suicidality, Psychosis or Substance Abuse With Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine or Lisdexamfetamine, a Post-authorization Safety Study [NCT04132557]430,000 participants (Actual)Observational2019-10-09Completed
A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Placebo- Controlled, Dose-Optimization, Cross-Over, Analog Classroom Study to Assess the Time of Onset of Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) in Pediatric Subjects Aged 6-12 With Attention-Deficit/Hy [NCT00500149]Phase 3129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-13Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre, Parallel-Group, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Dose-Optimisation Safety and Efficacy Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity [NCT00763971]Phase 3336 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-17Completed
The Effects of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Cognitive, Metabolic, and Reward Processes in Individuals With Binge-eating Symptoms [NCT04181957]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-01Terminated(stopped due to COVID-19)
A Phase III, Open-Label, Extension, Multi-Center, Safety and Efficacy Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) in Adolescents Aged 13-17 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00764868]Phase 3269 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-13Completed
An In Depth Cardiovascular Study of Lisdexamfetamine (LDX; Vyvanse) in Healthy and Treated Hypertensive Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00753012]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 4, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 in Adults Aged 18-55 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00877487]Phase 4123 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase IV, Real World, Open-label, Multi-centre Study on the Use of FOQUEST® (Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Controlled-release Capsules) for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Pediatric and Adult Patients [NCT04152629]Phase 4257 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-19Completed
A Single-Blind, Randomized Study of the Comparative Drug Likeability and Pharmacokinetics of Vyvanse™ and ADDERALL XR® When Administered as a Solution [NCT00776555]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-21Terminated(stopped due to The study was stopped by the sponsor based on a non-safety related business priority decision.)
A Phase 3b, Double-blind, Randomised, Active-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Time to Response of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate to Atomoxetine Hydrochloride in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disor [NCT01106430]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-28Completed
A Prospective, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Dose-Optimization Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) 20-70mg in Children Aged 6-12 Diagnosed With ADHD [NCT00500071]Phase 4318 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-28Completed
A Long-Term, Open-Label, and Single-Arm Study of NRP104 30 mg, 50 mg, or 70 mg Per Day in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00337285]Phase 3349 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter Study With Open-label & Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Withdrawal Phases to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, & Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults With Schizophrenia & Predominant Negative Symptoms Who Are Clinically Stable & [NCT00922272]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-14Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo Controlled Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Study of SPD489 in Adults 18-55 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as Augmentation Therapy to an Antidepressant [NCT00905424]Phase 2246 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-30Completed
Lisdexamfetamine for the Treatment of Severe Obesity in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years [NCT05416125]Early Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-20Recruiting
Study of the Effect of Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) on Sleep in Children Aged 6-12 Years With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00807222]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Double Blind, Three-Period Crossover, Estimation Study Using Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Immediate Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts and Placebo to Evaluate the Utility of a Standardized Computer Battery of Tests in Adults With Atten [NCT01010750]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-05Completed
A Phase III, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Withdrawal, Multicentre, Extension, Safety and Efficacy Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 With Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00784654]Phase 3276 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-27Completed
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Crossover Comparison of PRC-063 and Lisdexamfetamine in the Driving Performance of Adults With ADHD [NCT02555150]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Pilot Study of Vyvanse™ (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) in Adolescents (Ages 11-15) With ADHD and an Older Sibling With ADHD and Substance Dependence [NCT00573534]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) in Adolescents Aged 13-17 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00735371]Phase 3314 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-08Completed
Addition of High Dose Stimulant and Engagement-focused Contingency Management (CM), Alone and in Combination, to Treatment as Usual (TAU) for the Management of Methamphetamine (MA) Use Disorder (ASCME): a Canadian Multi-centre, RCT [NCT05854667]Phase 2440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-05Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, 3-Treatment, 3-Period, Crossover Study With One Week Per Treatment and Once-a-Day Dosing of Either NRP104, Adderall XR, or Placebo in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years With Attention-Deficit H [NCT00557011]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Single-Dose Crossover PD and PK Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Abuse Liability of IV Administered NRP104 25 mg and 50 mg in Adult Volunteers With Histories of Stimulant Abuse [NCT00247572]Phase 212 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Predictors of Healthy Mood and Memory After Oophorectomy [NCT01986764]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding was not obtained for this study and no participants were enrolled.)
LDX in the Treatment of Executive Function Difficulties in Women After Oophorectomy [NCT01986777]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding not obtained)
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Adjunctive Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Residual Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder Partially Responsive to Selective Serotonin or Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Monotherapy [NCT01148979]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Effects of Vyvanse on the Behavioral, Academic, and Psychosocial Functioning of College Students With ADHD [NCT01342445]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Profile of Clinical Response of Subacute Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse) Treatment vs. Clinical Response to Subacute Immediate Release Mixed Amphetamine Salt Therapy in Adult ADHD [NCT01070394]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
The Effects of Vyvanse on the Driving Performance of Young Adults With ADHD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [NCT00801229]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of NRP104 in Children Aged 6-12 Years With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [NCT00556296]Phase 3297 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Forced Dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of NRP104 in Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT00334880]Phase 3420 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Lis-dexamphetamine (LDX/SPD489)as a Treatment for Smoking Cessation in Nicotine Dependent Individuals With ADHD [NCT00736255]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in the Treatment of Adult ADHD With Anxiety Disorder Comorbidity [NCT01863459]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Naturalistic Study of ADHD Medication and Predictors of Treatment Outcome [NCT02136147]632 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2015-06-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label, Drug Interaction Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of SPD489 and EFFEXOR XR, Administered Alone and in Combination in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01235338]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-28Completed
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, 12-week, Forced-dose Titration Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 40mg, 100mg, or 160mg as Adjunctive Treatment to Established Maintenance [NCT01738698]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-01Terminated(stopped due to Study was discontinued due to non-safety related business prioritization decisions. No subjects were randomized.)
Open-Label Pilot Study of Lisdexamfetamine for Treatment of Cocaine Dependence [NCT01490216]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Six-Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Likeability, Safety, and Abuse Liability of NRP104 in Healthy Adult Volunteers With Histories of Stimulant Abuse [NCT00248092]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
The Effects of Vyvanse(TM) on Brain Hemodynamics and Reading [NCT00733356]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and fMRI Study of the Effects of Lisdexamfetamine on Bipolar Depression [NCT01051440]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment)
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Single Center, Parallel Group, Placebo and Active Comparator, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Profile of Single Doses of SPD489 in Healthy Adult Male Subjects Undergoing a Nocturnal Period of Acute Sle [NCT01096680]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-05Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, Three-period Crossover Drug Interaction Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of SPD503 and VYVANSE, Administered Alone and in Combination in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT00919867]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-24Completed
Does Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults Enhance Parenting Performance? [NCT01127607]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Attention & Memory Impairments in Menopausal Women: A Possible Role for Vyvanse? [NCT01324024]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Open-Label Pilot Study of Lisdexamfetamine for Cocaine Dependence [NCT01486810]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
The Use of Lisdexamfetamine in Clinical Practice at a Danish Child Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic Aimed at School Children (Age 7-13 Years) With Attention Deficit Disorders [NCT04727476]413 participants (Actual)Observational2021-01-19Active, not recruiting
Experimental fMRI Study on the Comparison of the Brain Function Effects of a Single Dose of Guanfacine and Lisdexamfetamine Relative to Placebo in Children and Adolescents With ADHD. [NCT03333668]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo Controlled, Dose Optimization, Crossover, Analog Classroom, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 in Adolescent Subjects Aged 13-17 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)) [NCT01274221]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-06Withdrawn(stopped due to Cancellation was not safety related but a shift in study priorities for Shire.)
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate Transdermal System (Daytrana), Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse), OROS MPH (Concerta), and Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release (Adderall XR) in Children and Adolescents With ADHD [NCT00889915]Phase 4228 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Pharmacological and Behavioral Treatments to Treat Loss-of-Control Eating and Improve Weight Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: Medication Change for Non-Responders (Stage 2b) [NCT04599504]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-02Enrolling by invitation
Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) [NCT02635035]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 (VYVANSE®) Compared With OROS-MPH (CONCERTA®) With a Placebo Reference Arm, in Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years Wit [NCT01552902]Phase 4549 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-03Completed
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, 26-week, Dose-optimization Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 Low Dose Range (40mg, 80mg, 100mg) and High Dose Range (120mg, 140mg, 160mg) [NCT01760889]Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-01Terminated(stopped due to Study was discontinued due to non-safety related business prioritization decisions. No subjects were randomized)
Imaging Stimulant vs. Non-Stimulant Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT02259517]38 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment/enrollment ended early due to the COVID-19 pandemic)
Objectifying the Day-time Response Variation of (Lis)Dexamphetamine in Adults With ADHD [NCT04946461]16 participants (Actual)Observational2021-07-01Completed
LAMAinDiab - Lisdexamphetamine vs Methylphenidate for Pediatric Patients With ADHD and Type 1 Diabetes - a Randomized Cross-over Clinical Trial [NCT05957055]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
The SPD489-323 Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Flexible Dose Titration, Efficacy and Safety Study of SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01436162]Phase 31,105 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-19Completed
Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults With Clinically Significant, Persistent Executive Function Impairments (EFI) and Partial or Full Remission of [NCT00985725]Phase 2143 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-29Completed
A Feasibility Study to Evaluate Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse) in Adults With Bulimia Nervosa [NCT03397446]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-21Terminated(stopped due to Loss of resources due to COVID-19 resulted in insufficient funds to complete the trial as planned. However, sufficient data was collected to fulfill the aims of the trial. Discontinuation is not related to the drug, its use, or adverse events.)
A Phase 3, Long-term, Open-label, Multicenter, 52-week, Flexible-dose Safety Study of SPD489 as Adjunctive Treatment to Established Maintenance Doses of Antipsychotic Medications on Negative Symptoms in Clinically Stable Adults Who Have Persistent Predomi [NCT01760993]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-01Terminated(stopped due to Study was discontinued due to non-safety related business prioritization decisions. No subjects were randomized.)
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized-withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Maintenance of Efficacy of SPD489 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Moderate to Severe Binge Eating Disorder [NCT02009163]Phase 3418 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-27Completed
A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Dose-optimization Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 (VYVANSE®) Compared With OROS-MPH (CONCERTA®) With a Placebo Reference Arm, in Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years With Att [NCT01552915]Phase 4464 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-17Completed
Cognitive-Behavioral and Pharmacologic (LDX) Treatment of Binge-Eating Disorder and Obesity [NCT03926052]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Ascending, Multiple Oral Doses of SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) in Clinically Stable Adults With Schizophren [NCT01457339]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-21Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse®) in Post-bariatric Surgery Patients [NCT03070509]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-12Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the FOCUS ADHD Mobile Health Platform in the Monitoring of Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT05551689]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-21Recruiting
The SPD489-322 Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Flexible Dose Titration, Efficacy and Safety Study of SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01436149]Phase 31,262 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-27Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double- Blind, Parallel-group, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Dose-ranging Efficacy and Safety Study of SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01435759]Phase 21,197 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Use of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Treatment of Cognitive Impairment (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome): A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study [NCT01071044]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Neurobiological Basis of Response to Vyvanse in Adults With ADHD: an fMRI Study of Brain Activation [NCT01924429]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter, 12-month Extension Safety and Tolerability Study of SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder With Residual Symptoms or Inadequate Response Following Treatmen [NCT01436175]Phase 31,570 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-27Terminated(stopped due to SPD489 failed to demonstrate a benefit as adjunctive treatment to antidepressants. Termination was not related to any new safety findings.)
The SPD489-344, Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Dose-optimization Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Moderate to Severe Binge Eating Disord [NCT01718509]Phase 3390 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-26Completed
Characterization and Sequential Pharmacotherapy of Severe Mood Dysregulation [NCT01714310]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Lisdexamfetamine Treatment for Cocaine Dependence [NCT00958282]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, 3-period Crossover Study Evaluating the Relative Bioavailability of SPD489 When the Contents Are Emptied Into a Soft Food and Orange Juice in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01890785]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-15Completed
Utilizing fMRI to Determine the Effects of Vyvanse® on Memory, Attention, and Brain Activity in Menopausal Women [NCT01977625]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Examining the Effects of Stimulant Medication on Emotional Lability in Patients With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [NCT01415440]117 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Effects of Lisdexamfetamine on Bradyphrenia in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01615887]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Treatment Outcomes With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse) in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Attention Deficits [NCT02712996]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-06Completed
Sequencing Treatments for Mothers With ADHD and Their At - Risk Children [NCT01816074]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter, 12-Month Safety and Tolerability Study of SPD489 in Preschool Children Aged 4-5 Years Diagnosed With Attention-deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder [NCT02466386]Phase 3113 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-21Completed
Effects of Lisdexamfetamine on Cognitive Control and Reward Response in Adolescents and Young Adults With ADHD: Neural and Clinical Outcomes [NCT02170298]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
The SPD489-343, Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Dose-optimization Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Moderate to Severe Binge Eating Disord [NCT01718483]Phase 3383 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-26Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, 12 Month Extension Safety and Tolerability Study of SPD489 in the Treatment of Adults With Binge Eating Disorder [NCT01657019]Phase 3604 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-21Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00337285 (3) [back to overview]Change in PSQI Total Score From Baseline at Up to One Year
NCT00337285 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement on CGI-I
NCT00337285 (3) [back to overview]Change in ADHD-RS-IV Total Score From Baseline at Up to One Year
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expression and Emotional Scale for Children (EESC) Scores at 7 Weeks
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Score at 7 Weeks
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement onParent Global Assessment (PGA)
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Scores at 7 Weeks
NCT00500071 (6) [back to overview]Weekly Change From Baseline in Total ADHD-RS-IV Score
NCT00500149 (2) [back to overview]Duration of Effect of Vyvanse
NCT00500149 (2) [back to overview]Onset of Effect of Vyvanse
NCT00573534 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least 70% Reduction in ADHD Symptoms as Measured by Change in ADHD Rating Scale From First to Last Visit
NCT00573534 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Low or no Substance Use During the Study vs the Number With Intermittent Use Judged by (1)Time Line Follow Back (Confidential Clinician Administered Record of Recent Substance Use) (2) Urine Toxicology.
NCT00573859 (3) [back to overview]The Interacting Effects of Smoking and Overnight Abstinence With ADHD Medication and Placebo on Continuous Performance Task (CPT) Errors of Omission.
NCT00573859 (3) [back to overview]The Interacting Effects of Smoking and Abstinence With ADHD Medication and Placebo on Nicotine Withdrawal Measured by the Shiffman-Jarvik Withdrawal Questionnaire.
NCT00573859 (3) [back to overview]The Effects of ADHD Medication Versus Placebo on Cotinine Levels
NCT00733356 (1) [back to overview]Gray Oral Reading Rest, Fourth Edition (GORT-4)
NCT00735371 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 4 Weeks
NCT00735371 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
NCT00735371 (3) [back to overview]Youth Quality of Life-Research Version (YQOL-R) Total Score
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Reaction Time Standard Error
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]N-back Test Proportion Correct Across 4 Load Factors
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]Smoking Rates
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects in Each Treatment Group Exhibiting Sustained, 4-week Smoking Abstinence, Defined as CO Levels <= 4 Ppm for Each Post-quit Study Visit.
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]ADHD Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) Self-Report and Observer Short Forms
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]Clinician Rated Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
NCT00736255 (7) [back to overview]Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Commission Errors
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Cmax of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Cmax of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]T 1/2 of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]T 1/2 of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Terminal Half-life (T 1/2) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Tmax of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Tmax of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]DRQ-S, Question 1, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]DRQ-S, Question 3, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Drug Rating Questionnaire-Subject (DRQ-S), Question 2, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC.
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram Results (QTcF Interval) for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Pulse Rate for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]AUC of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00746733 (19) [back to overview]AUC of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC
NCT00753012 (3) [back to overview]Blood Pressure at Maximum Exertion
NCT00753012 (3) [back to overview]Left Ventricle Size
NCT00753012 (3) [back to overview]Cardiac Function Index (E/A Ratio)
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form (CHIP-CE:PRF) Global T-score at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Conner's Parent Rating Scale - Revised (CPRS-R) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at up to 7 Weeks
NCT00763971 (8) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT00764868 (3) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT00764868 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (From the Antecedent Study, SPD489-305) in the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Research Version (YQOL-R) Total Score at up to 52 Weeks
NCT00764868 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (From the Antecedent Study, SPD489-305) in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 52 Weeks
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in The Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form (CHIP-CE:PRF) Global T-score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in The Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period, LOCF
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in BPRS-C Total Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The ADHD-RS-IV Total Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The CHIP-CE:PRF Global T-score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The HUI-2 Scores at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The WFIRS-P Global Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) During The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]C-SSRS During the Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Randomized Withdrawal Baseline
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Treatment Failures at End of The Randomized Withdrawal Period
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Open-label Baseline
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00784654 (18) [back to overview]Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period
NCT00801229 (1) [back to overview]"Participants Experiencing Collisions During Surprise Events in Driving Simulator"
NCT00877487 (3) [back to overview]Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 6 Weeks
NCT00877487 (3) [back to overview]Percent of Treatment Failures at up to 6 Weeks
NCT00877487 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) With Adult Prompts Total Score at up to 6 Weeks
NCT00889915 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
NCT00889915 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Global Improvements-Acceptability (CGI-A) Scale
NCT00889915 (3) [back to overview]Dichotomized Clinical Global Impression-Effectiveness (CGI-E) Scale
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Augmentation Baseline
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Augmentation Baseline
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the BRIEF-A Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6
NCT00905424 (18) [back to overview]Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Guanfacine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]T 1/2 of d-Amphetamine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Guanfacine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]AUC of d-Amphetamine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Tmax of d-Amphetamine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Cmax of d-Amphetamine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Time of Plasma Half-Life(T 1/2) of Guanfacine
NCT00919867 (8) [back to overview]Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Guanfacine
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on CGI-C at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in BRIEF-A T-Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in PANSS Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase, TOCF
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in SANS Global Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in UPSA-B Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in BAS Scores at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) T-scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants In Open-label Phase Who Were SANS-18 Responders at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in SANS Global Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in University of California Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase, LOCF
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Double-blind Randomization Baseline
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Open-label Baseline
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase, LOCF
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in PSQI Total Global Score at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in ACSA Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in BACS Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in HVLT-R Total Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in LNS Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in SANS-18 Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase, Termination Observation Carried Forward (TOCF)
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Letter-Number Span Test (LNS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Global Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in SAS Total Score at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Percent of Participants In Double-blind Phase Who Maintained SANS-18 Response at Week 4 Double-blind Phase
NCT00922272 (34) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Baseline in CDSS at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase
NCT00958282 (2) [back to overview]Drug Craving
NCT00958282 (2) [back to overview]Cocaine-positive Urine Results
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCF
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCF
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCF
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCF
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCF
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 9
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
NCT00985725 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]"Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale: Long Form (CAARS:L) Inattention/Memory Problems Sub-scale."
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]"Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Organization of Materials Sub-scale."
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -- Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span-Backward Subtest.
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT01000064 (7) [back to overview]Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II)
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Hyperactivity/Restlessness
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Impulsivity/Emotional Liability
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Problems With Self-Concept
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) Subscale Total Score (T-Score): Inattention/Memory Problems
NCT01010750 (6) [back to overview]Power of Attention Score
NCT01051440 (3) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I) Score.
NCT01051440 (3) [back to overview]Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Over Time.
NCT01051440 (3) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) Score.
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Psychometric Validation of AMSES
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder- Rating Scale (ADHS-RS)
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Correlation Between AMRS (In Clinic) and ADHD-RS
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Correlation Between In-Clinic AMRS and ASRS v.1.1 Symptom Checklist
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Change in Correlation Between AMRS and TASS
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Change in Measure of Smoothness of Effect Using Adult ADHD Medications Smoothness of Effect Scale (AMSES)
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Change in Symptom Rebound Score Using the Adult ADHD Medication Rebound Scale (AMRS).
NCT01070394 (8) [back to overview]Psychometric Validation of AMRS
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Hamiliton Anxiety Inventory
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS)
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]BRIEF-A
NCT01071044 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression (Severity)
NCT01096680 (5) [back to overview]Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Scores
NCT01096680 (5) [back to overview]Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT)
NCT01096680 (5) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Scores
NCT01096680 (5) [back to overview]PVT Scores by Timepoint
NCT01096680 (5) [back to overview]KSS Scores by Timepoint
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AIM-A Multi-Item Scales of Living With ADHD and General Well-being Score at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) With Adult Prompts Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S) ADHD Index T-score at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AIM-A Quality of Life Questions 1 and 4 Scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
NCT01101022 (15) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at 9 Weeks - LOCF
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at Up to 9 Weeks
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at Up to 9 Weeks
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Response
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale - Clinician (UKU-SERS-Clin) With Side Effects Scores >=1
NCT01106430 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at Up to 9 Weeks
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Barkley Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]ADHD Severity Clinical Global Impressions Severity Subscale
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Resting Blood Pressure
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale - Percent Present for All Reported Adverse Events Occurring at a Rate of 5% or More
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBD)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Counts
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale (DBD)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Brown Attention Deficit Scale (BAADS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Adult ADHD Rating Scale Completed at the End of the Med Optimization Phase
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Adult ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Weight
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Resting Pulse
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale Mean Severity Rating.
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Parenting Stress Index (PSI)--Total Stress
NCT01127607 (27) [back to overview]Parenting Locus of Control (PLC)
NCT01148979 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Dysphoric Apathy/Retardation Sub-factor (MDAR) of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 4 Weeks.
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]AUC of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]AUC of d-Amphetamine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]AUC of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]AUC of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Cmax of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Cmax of d-Amphetamine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Cmax of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Cmax of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Pulse Rate
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Tmax of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Tmax of d-Amphetamine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Tmax of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Tmax of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
NCT01235338 (18) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]4-Week Binge Response
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Up to 11 Weeks
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) Total Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 Weeks
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (YBOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 11
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Up to 11 Weeks
NCT01291173 (14) [back to overview]1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01324024 (3) [back to overview]NYU Paragraph Recall Task
NCT01324024 (3) [back to overview]Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS)
NCT01324024 (3) [back to overview]Penn Continuous Performance Test
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRSC) Total Scores at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With All Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QT Interval at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Height at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01328756 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)
NCT01342445 (2) [back to overview]Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)
NCT01342445 (2) [back to overview]Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)
NCT01415440 (1) [back to overview]Brain Structure Volume
NCT01435759 (4) [back to overview]Change in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16 (Double-blind Phase, Dose Response Evaluable Set)
NCT01435759 (4) [back to overview]Change in Average Pulse Rate From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
NCT01435759 (4) [back to overview]Change in Average Systolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
NCT01435759 (4) [back to overview]Change in Average Diastolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at up to 8 Weeks
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a 25% Response on the MADRS
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS SR)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life Enjoyment Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at up to 8 Weeks
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline Over Time in MADRS Total Score
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Short Form-12 Health Survey V2 (SF-12V2)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission on the MADRS
NCT01436149 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Response on the MADRS
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a 25% Response on the MADRS
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Response on the MADRS
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Short Form-12 Health Survey V2 (SF-12V2)
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline Over Time in MADRS Total Score
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) - Total Aggregate Score
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at 8 Weeks
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Global Fatigue Index (GFI)
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving Remission on the MADRS
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score Male
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score Female
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Abbreviated Brief Assessment of Cognition Affective Disorders (ABAC-A) Composite T-Scores
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at 8 Weeks
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT01436162 (14) [back to overview]Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]PRUQ-MDD - Number of Hours
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 52/ET
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score at Week 52/ET
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analog Scale
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]PRUQ-MDD - Number of Days of Resource Utilization
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]PRUQ-MDD - Effect of Depressive Symptoms
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Patient Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Major Depressive Disorder (PRUQ-MDD)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]PRUQ-MDD - Number of Events (Visit to Health Care Provider/Visit to Hospital Facilities/Number of Times a Test Was Performed)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Quality of Life Enjoyment Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Short Form-12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12V2)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01436175 (22) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 250 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 50 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 70 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 100 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 150 mg
NCT01457339 (84) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 200 mg
NCT01486810 (2) [back to overview]Mean Maximum Maintained Dose of Lisdexamfetamine for at Least 1 Week of Trial.
NCT01486810 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Maintained on the Maximum Lisdexamfetamine Daily Dose.
NCT01552902 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6
NCT01552902 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 6
NCT01552902 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6
NCT01552902 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
NCT01552902 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6
NCT01552915 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 8
NCT01552915 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01552915 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment
NCT01552915 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment
NCT01552915 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Vitals (Systolic Blood Pressure)
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Vitals (Diastolic Blood Pressure)
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Vitals
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]Paced Auditory Serial Audition Test (PASAT)
NCT01615887 (7) [back to overview]California Verbal Learning Test - 2nd Edition
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Mobility
NCT01657019 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety or Depression
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Revised Modified Overt Aggression Scale - Total Score
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Pulse
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Pulse
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Height
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Height
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Conners Teacher Global Index
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Conners Global Index Restless-Impulsive Subscale Parent Report
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Conners Global Index Emotional Lability Subscale - Parent Report
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression-Severity-Severe Mood Dysregulation
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression-Severity-Severe Mood Dysregulation
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Affective Reactivity Index - Parent Report
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Affective Reactivity Index - Parent Report
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression - Improvement
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]ADHD-IV Rating Scale
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]ADHD-IV Rating Scale
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Conners Parent Global Index
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Revised Modified Overt Aggression Scale - Total Score
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Weight
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Weight
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01714310 (23) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 12
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Fasting Total Cholesterol Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frontal Systems Behavior (FrSBe) Total Score at Week 12
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 12
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Binge Eating Response
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Scores at Week 12
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a 4-Week Cessation From Binge Eating
NCT01718483 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Days Per Week at Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With a 4-Week Cessation From Binge Eating
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Scores at Week 12
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight (kg) at Week 12
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 12
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Days Per Week at Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frontal Systems Behavior (FrSBe) Total Score at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Fasting Total Cholesterol Levels at Up to 12 Weeks
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Binge Eating Response
NCT01718509 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 12
NCT01816074 (3) [back to overview]Child Behavioral Functioning
NCT01816074 (3) [back to overview]Maternal Behavioral Functioning
NCT01816074 (3) [back to overview]Parental and Family Functioning
NCT01890785 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
NCT01890785 (4) [back to overview]AUC for D-amphetamine
NCT01890785 (4) [back to overview]Cmax for D-amphetamine
NCT01890785 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]WRAADS
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]The Go/No-Go Task Percentage Assessed by fMRI
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]fMRI Reaction Time
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]ADHD-RS-IV Combined Sum
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]ADHD-Inattentive
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]CGI-S
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]CGI-I
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]BRIEF-A
NCT01924429 (9) [back to overview]ASRS - Expanded
NCT01977625 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Signal
NCT01977625 (2) [back to overview]Change in BADDS Total Score
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Time to Relapse From Date of Randomization to Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Mobility at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety And Depression at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety And Depression at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5--Dimension 5--Level Self--Report Questionnaire (EQ--5D--5L) For Mobility at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Change From Randomized-Withdrawal Baseline in The Total Score of The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) During The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Change From Randomized-Withdrawal Baseline in The Number of Binge- Eating Days Per Week During The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Total Scores For The Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Scale During Follow-up
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities at Endpoint of The Open-label Period
NCT02009163 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period
NCT02259517 (1) [back to overview]Changes in Brain Segmentation Volume Produced by Stimulant or Non-stimulant Medications in Patients With ADHD
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sleep Patterns Assessed by Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Percentiles at Week 52/Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-Administered Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02466386 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)
NCT02635035 (2) [back to overview]Change in Score on Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV)
NCT02635035 (2) [back to overview]Change in Score on Barkley Functional Impairment Scale (BFIS)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Task-oriented Monitoring in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Monitor Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Total Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Working Memory and Concentration in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Performance on the Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Ability to Tolerate Change in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Shift Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Anxiety-Depression Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Attention Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Behavior Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Behavior Regulation Index (BRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Cognitive Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Cognitive Regulation Index (CRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Emotion Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Emotion Regulation Index (ERI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - CHILD SELF REPORT
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENT
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Reaction Time (RT) Standard Error (SE) on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Inattentiveness in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Omissions on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Inhibitory Control in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo Utilizing the Inhibit Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Physical Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Representational Memory in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Working Memory Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Severity of Symptoms Associated With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Hit Reaction Time (RT) Block Change on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Perseverations on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Ability to Begin Tasks in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Initiate Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
NCT02712996 (22) [back to overview]Assessing Hyperactivity in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
NCT03187353 (3) [back to overview]Brain Activation (BOLD Percent Signal Change)
NCT03187353 (3) [back to overview]Brain Activation (Glutamate Contrast)
NCT03187353 (3) [back to overview]Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS) Change Score (End of Trial Minus Baseline).
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Dose Response Relationship for Change From Baseline in ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version Total Score in Preschool Children at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Height at Week 6
NCT03260205 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-Administered Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score at Week 6
NCT03446885 (4) [back to overview]Ratings of Job Interview Performance
NCT03446885 (4) [back to overview]Ratings of Job Application Quality
NCT03446885 (4) [back to overview]Inattentive/Overactive Rating
NCT03446885 (4) [back to overview]Objective Observation of Workplace Productivity

Change in PSQI Total Score From Baseline at Up to One Year

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire consisting of 18 items which generates seven component scores on a scale from 0 (better sleep) to 3 (worse sleep) resulting in a global score of 0-21, where a higher number reflects worse sleep quality. (NCT00337285)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Vyvanse-1.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement on CGI-I

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement includes 1 and 2 on the scale. (NCT00337285)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vyvanse290

[back to top]

Change in ADHD-RS-IV Total Score From Baseline at Up to One Year

Change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline. The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00337285)
Timeframe: up to one year

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Vyvanse-24.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expression and Emotional Scale for Children (EESC) Scores at 7 Weeks

Expression and Emotional Scale for Children (EESC) consists of 29 items rated on a scale from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (very much true). Lower scores reflect better emotional outcomes. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: Baseline and 7 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Vyvanse-7.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Score at 7 Weeks

Change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline. The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: Baseline and 7 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Vyvanse-28.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the scale. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: 7 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vyvanse284

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement onParent Global Assessment (PGA)

Parent Global Assessment (PGA) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: 7 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vyvanse267

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Scores at 7 Weeks

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is an 86-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Lower scores reflect better functioning. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: Baseline and 7 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Recognition IndexMetacognition Index
Vyvanse-17.9-15.4-17.6

[back to top]

Weekly Change From Baseline in Total ADHD-RS-IV Score

Change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline. The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00500071)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7
Vyvanse-11.3-17.8-21.7-25.4-27.0-28.9-29.8

[back to top]

Duration of Effect of Vyvanse

Duration of effect will be defined as the first time point at which there is a non-significant difference between Vyvanse and placebo after a time point at which there is a significant difference between the two treatment groups as measured by SKAMP Deportment Scores. The degree of impairment is rated from 0 (normal) to 6 (maximal). (NCT00500149)
Timeframe: Evaluations were conducted at 1.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.0, and 13.0 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 hours2.5 hours5 hours7.5 hours10 hours12 hours13 hours
Placebo1.141.421.601.561.431.411.31
Vyvanse0.700.450.440.540.600.901.05

[back to top]

Onset of Effect of Vyvanse

The onset of effect will be defined as the first assessment time showing statistical significance between Vyvanse and placebo as measured by the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Deportment scale. The degree of impairment is rated from 0 (normal) to 6 (maximal). (NCT00500149)
Timeframe: Evaluations were conducted at 1.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.0, and 13.0 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 hours2.5 hours5 hours7.5 hours10 hours12 hours13 hours
Placebo1.141.421.601.561.431.411.31
Vyvanse0.700.450.440.540.600.901.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least 70% Reduction in ADHD Symptoms as Measured by Change in ADHD Rating Scale From First to Last Visit

The outcome is the number of subjects who achieved a clinically meaningful reduction in ADHD symptoms. This is defined as a 70% reduction from baseline as measured by change in the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The ADHD RS quantifies symptoms on a 0-3 scale, 0 meaning never present, 1 sometimes, 2 often present, 3 very often present. For this study, the scale was clinician administered using both parent and adolescent to achieve a consensus score, or a best estimate on the clinician's part when consensus could not be achieved (NCT00573534)
Timeframe: up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
much improved (70 percent or more drop in ADHD-RS)unimproved
Group 162

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Low or no Substance Use During the Study vs the Number With Intermittent Use Judged by (1)Time Line Follow Back (Confidential Clinician Administered Record of Recent Substance Use) (2) Urine Toxicology.

This outcome measure integrates data from self report supplied in the Time Line Follow Back (a self report summary of all substance and alcohol use over the previous week or month) with evidence from periodic (weekly to monthly) urine toxicologies. (NCT00573534)
Timeframe: up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
none-lowintermittent
Lisdexamfetamine Plus Family Therapy53

[back to top]

The Interacting Effects of Smoking and Overnight Abstinence With ADHD Medication and Placebo on Continuous Performance Task (CPT) Errors of Omission.

In the morning of each monitoring day, approximately 60 minutes after medication or placebo pill administration, participants were asked to either abstain from smoking or smoke their first cigarette of the day 5 minutes prior to starting the CPT. (NCT00573859)
Timeframe: 4 days

Interventionerrors (Mean)
ADHD medication + SmokingADHD medication + AbstinencePlacebo + SmokingPlacebo + Abstinence
ADHD Medication Versus Placebo0.401.081.002.8

[back to top]

The Interacting Effects of Smoking and Abstinence With ADHD Medication and Placebo on Nicotine Withdrawal Measured by the Shiffman-Jarvik Withdrawal Questionnaire.

The Shiffman-Jarvik withdrawal questionnaire measures nicotine withdrawal and was completed after each CPT assessment. The questionnaire consists of 25 items using 8-point scales. Total scores range from 0 to 200 and higher scores reflect higher levels of nicotine withdrawal. (NCT00573859)
Timeframe: 4 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Median)
ADHD medication + SmokingADHD medication + AbstinencePlacebo + SmokingPlacebo + Abstinence
ADHD Medication Versus Placebo92.791.397.0102.0

[back to top]

The Effects of ADHD Medication Versus Placebo on Cotinine Levels

Salivary cotinine was measured across two days on ADHD medication versus two days on placebo. (NCT00573859)
Timeframe: 4 days

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
ADHD medicationPlacebo
ADHD Medication Versus Placebo180.7274.0

[back to top]

Gray Oral Reading Rest, Fourth Edition (GORT-4)

"The GORT-4 evaluates oral reading rate, accuracy and comprehension. Both Forms A and B were used.Half of the subjects randomly were tested on From A at baseline and the other half were tested with Form B.~The GORT-4 is a standardized measure/test. Scores provided are standard scores, which range from 1 to 20, with a Mean of 10 and Standard Deviation of 3. A higher score means better reading performance. There was no total score used or calculated in this study." (NCT00733356)
Timeframe: baseline and final day (lab school Assessments)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ADHD With Vyvanse Treatment8.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 4 Weeks

The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00735371)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) 30 mg-18.3
LDX 50 mg-21.1
LDX 70 mg-20.7
Placebo-12.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00735371)
Timeframe: 1, 2, 3 and 4 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) 30 mg44
LDX 50 mg53
LDX 70 mg57
Placebo30

[back to top]

Youth Quality of Life-Research Version (YQOL-R) Total Score

The Youth Quality of Life-research version (YQOL-R) is a validated 56-item generic instrument for comparing quality of life of adolescents across condition groups that scores each question on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). The YQOL scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale for easy interpretability. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT00735371)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline4 Weeks
LDX 50 mg80.581.3
LDX 70 mg78.881.3
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX) 30 mg79.381.1
Placebo79.281.3

[back to top]

Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Reaction Time Standard Error

The CPT is a measure of both vigilance/sustained attention and response inhibition, has good normative data and has been shown to be sensitive to the effects of stimulants. Reaction time variability and commission errors - measures of attentional control and response inhibition have been shown to be sensitive in discriminating individuals with ADHD on active medication versus placebo. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Randomization, Visits 1 (day 4), 2 (day 7), 3 (day 11), 4 (day 14), 5 (day 18), 6 (day 21), 7 (day 25), 8 (day 28)

,
InterventionReaction time in seconds (Mean)
Randomization (Visit 0)Visit 1 (day 4)Visit 2 (day 7)Visit 3 (day 11)Visit 4 (day 14)Visit 5 (day 18)Visit 6 (day 21)Visit 7 (day 25)Visit 8 (day 28)
LDX and NRT5.375.525.424.974.835.544.645.294.86
NRT and Placebo4.614.685.055.014.795.154.975.735.08

[back to top]

N-back Test Proportion Correct Across 4 Load Factors

This is measured by the N-Back test, a cognitive functioning, including working memory test. The test is designed with 4 Load Factors, where the current stimulus matches the one from 'n' steps back or prior in the sequence. The load factor n is adjusted so there is a 'O-back' (i.e. 'n-0'), '1-back' (i.e. 'n-1'), '2-back' (i.e. 'n-2'), and '3-back' (i.e. 'n-3'). When the correct stimulus appears on the screen, the participant then responds on the computer. Missing the stimulus decreases the proportion correct. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Randomization, Visits 1 (day 4), 2 (day 7), 3 (day 11), 4 (day 14), 5 (day 18), 6 (day 21), 7 (day 25), 8 (day 28)

,
Interventionproportion correct to stimuli response (Mean)
Randomization (Visit 0) 0-back _%corRandomization (Visit 0) 1-back _%corRandomization (Visit 0) 2-back _%corRandomization (Visit 0) 3-back _%corVisit 1 (day 4) 0-back _%corVisit 1 (day 4) 1-back _%corVisit 1 (day 4) 2-back _%corVisit 1 (day 4) 3-back _%corVisit 2 (day 7) 0-back _%corVisit 2 (day 7) 1-back _%corVisit 2 (day 7) 2-back _%corVisit 2 (day 7) 3-back _%corVisit 3 (day 11) 0-back _%corVisit 3 (day 11) 1-back _%corVisit 3 (day 11) 2-back _%corVisit 3 (day 11) 3-back _%corVisit 4 (day 14) 0-back _%corVisit 4 (day 14) 1-back _%corVisit 4 (day 14) 2-back _%corVisit 4 (day 14) 3-back _%corVisit 5 (day 18) 0-back _%corVisit 5 (day 18) 1-back _%corVisit 5 (day 18) 2-back _%corVisit 5 (day 18) 3-back _%corVisit 6 (day 21) 0-back _%corVisit 6 (day 21) 1-back _%corVisit 6 (day 21) 2-back _%corVisit 6 (day 21) 3-back _%corVisit 7 (day 25) 0-back _%corVisit 7 (day 25)1-back _%corVisit 7 (day 25) 2-back _%corVisit 7 (day 25) 3-back _%corVisit 8 (day 28) 0-back _%corVisit 8 (day 28) 1-back _%corVisit 8 (day 28) 2-back _%corVisit 8 (day 28) 3-back _%cor
LDX and NRT0.960.940.960.840.950.900.890.800.930.900.860.810.890.890.890.840.930.910.900.901.000.980.990.880.930.930.900.890.990.990.970.910.930.980.920.91
NRT and Placebo1.000.990.950.801.000.990.960.830.920.950.920.810.990.990.950.900.990.990.950.890.990.990.980.921.000.980.960.870.990.990.950.880.990.980.950.84

[back to top]

Smoking Rates

Smoking rates, measured as self-reported cigarettes/day. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Randomization, visits 1 (day 4), 2 (day 7), 3 (day 11), 4 (day 14), 5 (day 18), 6 (day 21), 7 (day 25), 8 (day 28)

,
InterventionCigarettes smoked per day (Mean)
Randomization (Visit 0)Visit 1 (day 4)Visit 2 (day 7)Visit 3 (day 11)Visit 4 (day 14)Visit 5 (day 18)Visit 6 (day 21)Visit 7 (day 25)Visit 8 (day 28)
LDX and NRT6.433.903.162.752.983.083.944.384.15
NRT and Placebo8.142.591.832.232.102.922.672.332.91

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects in Each Treatment Group Exhibiting Sustained, 4-week Smoking Abstinence, Defined as CO Levels <= 4 Ppm for Each Post-quit Study Visit.

The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group exhibiting sustained, 4-week smoking abstinence, defined as CO levels <= 4 ppm for each post-quit study visit. Subjects who dropped from the study for any reason were considered to have lapsed. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LDX and NRT5
NRT and Placebo3

[back to top]

ADHD Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) Self-Report and Observer Short Forms

"T-scores derived from compiled ADHD symptoms from two forms. Specifically the t-scores for the DSM-IV Total subscale, representing ADHD symptoms. This is conducted by the participant and clinician at randomization, visits 2 and 4 (i.e. dose titration visits), Visit 6 (i.e. monitoring visit), and Visit 8 (i.e. final/end of study visit).~The following describes severity of the ADHD symptoms (based upon T-Score):~70+ = Very Much Above Average 66-70 = Much Above Average 61-65 = Above Average 56-60 = Slightly Above Average 45-55 = Average 30-44 = Below Average (Low scores are good)" (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Randomization, Visits 2 (day 7), 4 (day 14), 6 (day 21), 8 (day 28)

,
InterventionT-score on a scale (Mean)
Randomization (Visit 0)Visit 2 (day 7)Visit 4 (day 14)Visit 6 (day 21)Visit 8 (day 28)
LDX and NRT67.1363.0758.6252.8354.00
NRT and Placebo68.0864.6265.2563.4261.92

[back to top]

Clinician Rated Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

Measures clinician's perception of patient improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. 1-Very Much Improved through 7-Very Much Worse. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Visits 2 (day 7), 4 (day 14), 6 (day 21), 8 (day 28)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 (day 7) CGI-IVisit 4 (day 14) CGI-IVisit 6 (day 21) CGI_IVisit 8 (day 28) CGI-I
LDX and NRT2.882.732.292.00
NRT and Placebo3.503.383.313.15

[back to top]

Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Commission Errors

The CPT is a measure of both vigilance/sustained attention and response inhibition, has good normative data and has been shown to be sensitive to the effects of stimulants. Reaction time variability and commission errors - measures of attentional control and response inhibition have been shown to be sensitive in discriminating individuals with ADHD on active medication versus placebo. (NCT00736255)
Timeframe: Randomization, Visits 1 (day 4), 2 (day 7), 3 (day 11), 4 (day 14), 5 (day 18), 6 (day 21), 7 (day 25), 8 (day 28)

,
InterventionErrors of Commission (Mean)
Randomization (Visit 0)Visit 1 (day 4)Visit 2 (day 7)Visit 3 (day 11)Visit 4 (day 14)Visit 5 (day 18)Visit 6 (day 21)Visit 7 (day 25)Visit 8 (day 28)
LDX and NRT15.2913.2913.4414.5013.1315.0012.3614.6414.92
NRT and Placebo12.4310.7110.8610.7911.0811.1512.1511.7711.23

[back to top]

Cmax of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

l-Amphetamine is an isomer of Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Adderall XR7.91
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC8.10

[back to top]

Cmax of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Total amphetamine is the d- and l-amphetamines. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Adderall XR36.56
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC38.05

[back to top]

T 1/2 of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

l-Amphetamine is an isomer of Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Adderall XR11.98
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC13.06

[back to top]

T 1/2 of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Total amphetamine is the d- and l-amphetamines. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Adderall XR10.38
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC11.05

[back to top]

Terminal Half-life (T 1/2) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

d-Amphetamine is an isomer of Vyvanse and Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Vyvanse9.7
Adderall XR10.25
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC10.4
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC10.91

[back to top]

Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

d-Amphetamine is an isomer of Vyvanse and Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Vyvanse3.5
Adderall XR5.2
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC3.5
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC3.3

[back to top]

Tmax of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

l-Amphetamine is an isomer of Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Adderall XR5.6
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC3.5

[back to top]

Tmax of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Total amphetamine is the d- and l-amphetamines. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionh (Mean)
Adderall XR5.30
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC3.29

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

d-Amphetamine is an isomer of Vyvanse and Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Vyvanse45.04
Adderall XR28.66
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC46.34
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC29.97

[back to top]

DRQ-S, Question 1, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Question 1: How much do you feel the drug now? Questions are rated on a 29-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 29 (an awful lot). The higher the score the stronger the subjective experience. This is a subjective measure of a drug's effect that has been used to assess the abuse potential of drugs. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after dosing

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 h1 h1.5 h2 h2.5 h3 h3.5 h4 h5 h6 h8 h12 h24 h
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC1.01.31.92.33.53.52.72.12.11.91.51.31.21.0
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC1.01.32.15.26.06.05.34.93.83.13.43.04.41.6

[back to top]

DRQ-S, Question 3, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Question 3: Do you dislike the drug effect you are feeling now? Questions are rated on a 29-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 29 (an awful lot). The higher the score the stronger the subjective experience. This is a subjective measure of a drug's effect that has been used to assess the abuse potential of drugs. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after dosing

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 h1 h1.5 h2 h2.5 h3 h3.5 h4 h5 h6 h8 h12 h24 h
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC1.02.12.01.81.41.41.21.31.31.31.21.11.21.0
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC1.02.01.84.34.53.83.42.61.82.31.61.61.31.1

[back to top]

Drug Rating Questionnaire-Subject (DRQ-S), Question 2, for Vyvanse and Adderall XR in Combination With Prilosec OTC.

Question 2: How much do you like the effects you are feeling now? Questions are rated on a 29-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 29 (an awful lot). The higher the score the stronger the subjective experience. This is a subjective measure of a drug's effect that has been used to assess the abuse potential of drugs. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after dosing

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 h1 h1.5 h2 h2.5 h3 h3.5 h4 h5 h6 h8 h12 h24 h
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC1.02.02.02.22.52.31.51.31.41.31.21.31.11.0
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC1.01.21.84.64.63.93.52.71.72.41.41.41.21.3

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram Results (QTcF Interval) for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

QTcF is the QT interval using Fridericia's correction formula. QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and is dependent on the heart rate(e.g., the faster the heart rate, the shorter the QT interval). The QT interval has to be corrected in order to aid interpretation. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours after dosing

,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Pre-dose2 h8 h
Adderall XR398.3394.6393.8
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC399.8396.1394.4
Vyvanse399.8395.0390.0
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC399.3397.9395.4

[back to top]

Pulse Rate for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

(NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after dosing

,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Pre-dose1 h2 h4 h8 h12 h24 h48 h72 h96 h
Adderall XR69.070.075.274.579.182.374.774.073.370.4
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC71.473.880.578.481.582.776.475.072.773.9
Vyvanse70.969.778.279.084.886.479.973.272.270.7
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC73.373.483.484.487.789.180.475.172.072.5

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

(NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after dosing

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pre-dose1 h2 h4 h8 h12 h24 h48 h72 h96 h
Adderall XR115.3121.0122.2120.8122.4121.9118.1112.6114.8114.5
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC113.9122.6124.7124.2119.2118.4115.6113.6116.0116.1
Vyvanse115.6122.8127.9127.6126.0123.4114.0114.6113.7114.0
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC114.8121.7125.5125.2123.5122.2114.7114.4115.1114.8

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

(NCT00746733)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after dosing

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pre-dose1 h2 h4 h8 h12 h24 h48 h72 h96 h
Adderall XR74.176.475.477.774.178.576.873.574.775.7
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC75.880.481.982.079.277.875.474.477.978.3
Vyvanse76.079.279.079.978.679.675.974.575.174.5
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC77.780.582.082.080.378.775.077.276.175.7

[back to top]

AUC of Total Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

Total amphetamine is the d- and l-amphetamines. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Adderall XR620.68
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC620.91

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of d-Amphetamine for Vyvanse and Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

d-Amphetamine is an isomer of Vyvanse and Adderall XR and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Vyvanse626.27
Adderall XR473.70
Vyvanse + Prilosec OTC687.00
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC472.35

[back to top]

AUC of l-Amphetamine for Adderall XR Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC

(NCT00746733)
Timeframe: 0 through 96 hours after dosing

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Adderall XR145.28
Adderall XR + Prilosec OTC145.83

[back to top]

Blood Pressure at Maximum Exertion

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at maximum exertion following 3-6 months of stimulant medication, according to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) (NCT00753012)
Timeframe: 3-6 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Normotensive Adults With ADHD80.43
Primary Hypertensive Adults With ADHD85.00

[back to top]

Left Ventricle Size

Size of the heart's left ventricle chamber (Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension; LVEDD) following 3-6 months of stimulant medication, according to cardiac ultrasound (transthoracic echocardiogram; TTE) (NCT00753012)
Timeframe: 3-6 months

Interventionmm (Mean)
Normotensive Adults With ADHD44.42
Primary Hypertensive Adults With ADHD43.57

[back to top]

Cardiac Function Index (E/A Ratio)

Left ventricle diastolic function index, following 3-6 months of stimulant medication, according to cardiac ultrasound (transthoracic echocardiogram; TTE) (NCT00753012)
Timeframe: 3-6 months

Interventioncm/sec/cm/sec (Mean)
Normotensive Adults With ADHD1.38
Primary Hypertensive Adults With ADHD1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form (CHIP-CE:PRF) Global T-score at up to 7 Weeks

The CHIP-CE:PRF evaluates health-related quality of life. It is composed of 5 domains (satisfaction, comfort, resilience, avoidance, and achievement) consisting of a total of 76 items. The global score is an average of the scores for the 5 domains. The majority of items assess frequency of events using a 5-point response format. There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. Higher scores indicate better health. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)8.6
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride7.1
Placebo-0.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Up to 7 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)78.0
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride60.6
Placebo14.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at up to 7 Weeks

The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale with each item scored from 0 (never/not at all) to 3 (very often/very much). Mean scores range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-0.3
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride-0.3
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Conner's Parent Rating Scale - Revised (CPRS-R) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks

The Conner's Parent rating Scale-revised short version (CPRS-R) consists of 27 questions graded on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true) with a total score ranging from 0 to 81. Higher scores are indicative of increased ADHD. This scale allows parents to respond on the basis of the child's behavior and help assess ADHD and evaluate problem behavior. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-24.5
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride-18.4
Placebo-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks

The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in ADHD symptomology. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-24.3
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride-18.7
Placebo-5.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at up to 7 Weeks

The BPRS-C characterizes psychopathology. A total of 21 items are rated on a scale from 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 126. A decrease in score indicates a reduction in psychopathology. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-9.15
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride-9.71
Placebo-2.59

[back to top]

Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at up to 7 Weeks

HUI is used to describe health status and to obtain utility scores by collecting data using one or more questionnaires in formats selected to match the specific study design criteria. Scoring ranges from 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). Higher scores represent better health status. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 7 weeks

,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineUp to 7 weeks
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)0.8110.878
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride0.8220.887
Placebo0.8060.843

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a 19-item semi-structured interview designed to capture suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. (NCT00763971)
Timeframe: Up to 7 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal ideationNon-suicidal self injurious behavior
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)11
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride00
Placebo00

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00764868)
Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)87.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (From the Antecedent Study, SPD489-305) in the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Research Version (YQOL-R) Total Score at up to 52 Weeks

The Youth Quality of Life-research version (YQOL-R) is a validated 56-item generic instrument for comparing quality of life of adolescents across condition groups that scores each question on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). The YQOL scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale for easy interpretability. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT00764868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to 52 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (From the Antecedent Study, SPD489-305) in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at up to 52 Weeks

The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00764868)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 52 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-26.2

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in The Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form (CHIP-CE:PRF) Global T-score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

The CHIP-CE:PRF evaluates health-related quality of life. It is composed of 5 domains (satisfaction, comfort, resilience, avoidance, and achievement) consisting of a total of 76 items. The global score is an average of the scores for the 5 domains. The majority of items assess frequency of events using a 5-point response format. There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. Higher scores indicate better health. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At open-label baseline and endpoint (Week-26) of the open-label period

InterventionT-scores (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)10.2

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in The Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period, LOCF

HUI is used to describe health status and to obtain utility scores by collecting data using one or more questionnaires in formats selected to match the specific study design criteria. Scoring ranges from 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). Higher scores represent better health status. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At open-label baseline and endpoint (Week-26) of the open-label period

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)0.087

[back to top]

Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale with each item scored from 0 (never/not at all) to 3 (very often/very much). Mean scores range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At open-label baseline and endpoint (Week-26) of the open-label period

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)-0.43

[back to top]

Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in BPRS-C Total Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

The BPRS-C characterizes psychopathology. A total of 21 items are rated on a scale from 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 126. A decrease in score indicates a reduction in psychopathology. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)-17.1
Placebo (Randomized Period)-9.1

[back to top]

Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The ADHD-RS-IV Total Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in ADHD symptomology. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)1.2
Placebo (Randomized Period)13.8

[back to top]

Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The CHIP-CE:PRF Global T-score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

The CHIP-CE:PRF evaluates health-related quality of life. It is composed of 5 domains (satisfaction, comfort, resilience, avoidance, and achievement) consisting of a total of 76 items. The global score is an average of the scores for the 5 domains. The majority of items assess frequency of events using a 5-point response format. There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. Higher scores indicate better health. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)1.1
Placebo (Randomized Period)-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The HUI-2 Scores at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

HUI is used to describe health status and to obtain utility scores by collecting data using one or more questionnaires in formats selected to match the specific study design criteria. Scoring ranges from 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). Higher scores represent better health status. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)-0.005
Placebo (Randomized Period)-0.046

[back to top]

Change From Randomized Withdrawal Baseline in The WFIRS-P Global Score at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale with each item scored from 0 (never/not at all) to 3 (very often/very much). Mean scores range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)0.01
Placebo (Randomized Period)0.20

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) During The Open-label Period

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: From open-label baseline to Week-26

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal ideationSuicidal behavior
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)10

[back to top]

C-SSRS During the Randomized Withdrawal Period

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period to end of the study (Up to 6 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal ideationSuicidal behavior
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)00
Placebo (Randomized Period)00

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. Improvement includes CGI-I categories of very much improved and much improved. No improvement includes all other assessed categories. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At Week 26

Interventionpercentage of improved participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)79.8

[back to top]

Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in ADHD symptomology. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Open-label baseline and Endpoint (Week-26)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)-26.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)39.946.51.56.64.50.50.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Randomized Withdrawal Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Randomized withdrawal baseline

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)50.050.000000
Placebo (Randomized Period)46.853.200000

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Treatment Failures at End of The Randomized Withdrawal Period

Treatment failure defined as 50% increase (worsening) in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) total score and >= 2 point increase (worsening) in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score observed at any visit during the randomized withdrawal period compared to the respective scores at baseline of randomized withdrawal period. Subjects without an endpoint value were classed as treatment failures. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Baseline of the randomized withdrawal period and its relevant endpoint (Up to 6 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)15.8
Placebo (Randomized Period)67.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Open-label Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill). (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: Open-label baseline

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)001.527.250.217.63.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Endpoint of The Randomized Withdrawal Period, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At endpoint of the randomized withdrawal period (Up to 6 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Randomized Period)40.041.38.010.7000
Placebo (Randomized Period)8.219.211.039.715.16.80

[back to top]

Change From Open-Label Baseline in The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at Endpoint (Week-26) of The Open-label Period

The BPRS-C characterizes psychopathology. A total of 21 items are rated on a scale from 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 126. A decrease in score indicates a reduction in psychopathology. (NCT00784654)
Timeframe: At open-label baseline and endpoint (Week-26) of the open-label period

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)(Open-label Period)-13.9

[back to top]

"Participants Experiencing Collisions During Surprise Events in Driving Simulator"

"Initial results from a one hour driving simulation in the MIT AgeLab Driving Simulator as compared to second session in the simulator following a 6-week trial on Lisdexamfetamine or placebo. During the simulation, surprise events, designed to test the participant's attention and driving, occurred. This outcome presents the difference in number of collisions experience by individuals treated with Vyvanse or Placebo." (NCT00801229)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vyvanse8
Placebo17

[back to top]

Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 6 Weeks

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00877487)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Placebo5.011.711.733.335.03.30
SPD48932.135.717.97.17.100

[back to top]

Percent of Treatment Failures at up to 6 Weeks

Treatment failure defined as > or equal to 50% increase in the ADHD-RS with adult prompts total score and a > or equal to 2 point increase in the CGI-S score. (NCT00877487)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD4898.9
Placebo75.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) With Adult Prompts Total Score at up to 6 Weeks

The ADHD-RS consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00877487)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SPD4891.6
Placebo16.8

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

The CGI-I score at the subject's last study visit at or before Week 6, is one of the 3 secondary endpoints that contribute to the primary endpoint (CGI-E). The CGI-I scale will be used to rate improvement in the subject's condition (benefits) since baseline using the following 7-point scale: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=not changed, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. (NCT00889915)
Timeframe: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Daytrana (Methylphenidate Transdermal System2.0
Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)2.0
Concerta (Osmotic-release Oral System Methylphenidate)2.0
Adderall (Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release)2.0

[back to top]

Clinical Global Improvements-Acceptability (CGI-A) Scale

The CGI-A score at the subject's last study visit at or before Week 6 is one of the 3 secondary endpoints that contribute to the primary endpoint (CGI-E). The CGI-A will be used to assess the acceptability of the study medication with respect to the subject's experience with the formulation of medication. The 7-point rating for the CGI-A will be: 1=very high acceptability, 2=high acceptability, 3=above average acceptability, 4=average acceptability, 5=low acceptability, 6=very low acceptability, 7=extremely low acceptability (NCT00889915)
Timeframe: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Daytrana (Methylphenidate Transdermal System3.0
Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)2.0
Concerta (Osmotic-release Oral System Methylphenidate)2.0
Adderall (Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release)2.0

[back to top]

Dichotomized Clinical Global Impression-Effectiveness (CGI-E) Scale

The CGI-E is the value at which the participant's Therapeutic Benefit and Adverse Impact to the study drug intersect. This number is determined by combining each participant's scores for the degree of Therapeutic Benefit versus the degree to which problems with Tolerability and/or Acceptability adversely impact the subject. Participants are then determined to be Responders or Non-responders to the study medication. For example, a subject who is very much improved (CGI-I=1) or much improved (CGI-I=2) therapeutically and whose adverse impact rating is none (score 1,5) or mild (score 2,6) will be categorized as a Responder. All others whose adverse impact rating is moderate (score 3,7,11,15)or outweighs therapeutic effect (score 4,8,12,16) will be categorized as Non-responders to study medication. The CGI scores are totaled for each participant and a mean score is calculated. A median total score was calculated for each treatment group. (NCT00889915)
Timeframe: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Daytrana (Methylphenidate Transdermal System7.0
Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)5.0
Concerta (Osmotic-release Oral System Methylphenidate)6.0
Adderall (Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release)6.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)60.0
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)45.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)65.2
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)52.4

[back to top]

Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Augmentation Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation baseline

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)1.612.534.448.43.100
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)1.520.040.032.36.200

[back to top]

Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Week 6

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)14.524.222.629.09.700
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)27.031.730.29.51.600

[back to top]

Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Augmentation Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)23.871.44.80000
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)26.147.821.74.3000

[back to top]

Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Week 6

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)61.923.89.54.8000
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)50.036.413.60000

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Scale Total Score at Week 6

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to develop interpretive reports. Lower scores reflect better functioning. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Regulation IndexMetacognition Index
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-1.7-1.7-1.5
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-4.7-3.7-4.8

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the BRIEF-A Scale Total Score at Week 6

BRIEF-A is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Lower scores reflect better functioning. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Regulation IndexMetacognition Index
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-2.7-1.5-3.4
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)-0.9-0.4-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-4.9
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-4.0

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-7.1
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6

MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-5.3
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6

QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-2.4
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)-3.7
Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)0.1
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)-0.8
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6

MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)-4.0
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6

QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)-1.9
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment. (NCT00905424)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)-1.6
Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)-0.6

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Guanfacine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD503 Alone2.55
SPD503 + Vyvanse2.97

[back to top]

T 1/2 of d-Amphetamine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Vyvanse Alone11.2
SPD503 + Vyvanse11.2

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Guanfacine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
SPD503 Alone104.9
SPD503 + Vyvanse112.8

[back to top]

AUC of d-Amphetamine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Vyvanse Alone686.9
SPD503 + Vyvanse708.4

[back to top]

Tmax of d-Amphetamine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Vyvanse Alone4.2
SPD503 + Vyvanse3.9

[back to top]

Cmax of d-Amphetamine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Vyvanse Alone36.48
SPD503 + Vyvanse36.50

[back to top]

Time of Plasma Half-Life(T 1/2) of Guanfacine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
SPD503 Alone23.5
SPD503 + Vyvanse21.4

[back to top]

Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Guanfacine

(NCT00919867)
Timeframe: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 30, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
SPD503 Alone8.6
SPD503 + Vyvanse7.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on CGI-C at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

CGI-C permits a global evaluation of the change of the subject's overall schizophrenia condition over time. It consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Phase Week 4

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)17.2
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)27.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) at Week 10 Open-label Phase

CGI-C permits a global evaluation of the change of the subject's overall schizophrenia condition over time. It consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Phase Week 10

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)30.0

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in BRIEF-A T-Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Recognition IndexMetacognition Index
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-1.2-1.6-0.7
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)-1.7-0.9-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in PANSS Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase, TOCF

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Positive subscaleNegative subscaleGeneral Psychopathology subscale
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-0.1-0.1-0.9
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.50.90.9

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in SANS Global Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

The SANS assesses 5 symptom complexes to rate the negative symptoms of subjects. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Affective FlatteningAlogiaAvolition-ApathyAnhedonia-AsocialityAttention
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)0.20.00.10.10.3
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.20.50.20.30.4

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in UPSA-B Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

UPSA-B assesses skills in 5 areas of life functioning. It contains 2 subscales. Percentages correct on these 2 subscales are multiplied by 50. Thus, scores can range from 0 to 50 on each of these 2 subscales, and total scores can range from 0 to 100. Scores of 75 or higher are associated with independent living. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Total SkillsCommunication SkillsFinancial Skills
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)0.0-0.60.9
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)-1.5-1.5-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
ObjectiveSubjectiveGlobal
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)0.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in BAS Scores at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
ObjectiveSubjectiveGlobal
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-0.1-0.1-0.2
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) T-scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionT-scores (Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Recognition IndexMetacognition Index
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-3.9-3.1-3.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants In Open-label Phase Who Were SANS-18 Responders at Week 10 Open-label Phase

Response is defined as reduction in total SANS score of greater than or equal to 20%. The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)52.9

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in SANS Global Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase

The SANS assesses 5 symptom complexes to rate the negative symptoms of subjects. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Affective FlatteningAlogiaAvolition-ApathyAnhedonia-AsocialityAttention
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-0.9-0.9-0.5-0.7-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in University of California Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase, LOCF

UPSA-B assesses skills in 5 areas of life functioning. It contains 2 subscales. Percentages correct on these 2 subscales are multiplied by 50. Thus, scores can range from 0 to 50 on each of these 2 subscales, and total scores can range from 0 to 100. Scores of 75 or higher are associated with independent living. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Total SkillsCommunication SkillsFinancial Skills
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)6.23.72.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Double-blind Randomization Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)02.960.037.1000
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)02.950.038.28.800

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Week 10 Open-label Phase

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)02.954.338.64.300

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Week 4 Double-blind Phase

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)013.869.013.83.400
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)03.434.548.313.800

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Open-label Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)0029.355.414.11.10

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Scores at Week 10 Open-label Phase, LOCF

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Positive subscaleNegative subscaleGeneral Psychopathology subscale
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-1.0-4.8-4.0

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in PSQI Total Global Score at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase

PSQI evaluates 7 areas of quality and pattern of sleep. Each area is rated on a scale from 0 (better) to 3 (worse) with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Reduction in total scores are associated with better sleep quality. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.3
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in ACSA Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.4
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in BACS Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

BACS measures attention and speed of processing, and the test score is the total number correct. The measure of the test is the number of correct numerals where subjects write numerals 1-9 as matches to nonmeaningful symbols on a response sheet for 90 seconds, based upon a key provided to them. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4

Interventioncorrect numerals (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.1
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in HVLT-R Total Scores at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

HVLT-R measures verbal learning. Test scores are the total number of words recalled correctly over 3 trials. The test consists of 12 nouns read aloud for 3 consecutive trials and each trial is followed by a recall test. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and week 4 Double-blind Phase

Interventionwords recalled (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)-1.5
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)1.0

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in LNS Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

LNS is a test of verbal working memory. Subjects are presented with a sequence of numbers and letters aurally and then asked to tell the rater the numbers first from lowest to highest followed by the letters in alphabetical sequence. The measure is the number of correct sequences. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4

Interventioncorrect sequences (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)-0.1
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)1.3

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Randomization Baseline in SANS-18 Total Score at Week 4 Double-blind Phase, Termination Observation Carried Forward (TOCF)

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Double-blind Randomization Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)4.5
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)2.2

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) at Week 10 Open-label Phase

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

HVLT-R measures verbal learning. Test scores are the total number of words recalled correctly over 3 trials. The test consists of 12 nouns read aloud for 3 consecutive trials and each trial is followed by a recall test. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10

Interventionwords recalled (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)0.7

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Letter-Number Span Test (LNS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

LNS is a test of verbal working memory. Subjects are presented with a sequence of numbers and letters aurally and then asked to tell the rater the numbers first from lowest to highest followed by the letters in alphabetical sequence. The measure is the number of correct sequences. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and week 10 Open-label Phase

Interventioncorrect sequences (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)0.8

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-12.9

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Global Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

PSQI evaluates 7 areas of quality and pattern of sleep. Each area is rated on a scale from 0 (better) to 3 (worse) with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Reduction in total scores are associated with better sleep quality. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in SAS Total Score at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 4 Double-blind Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)0.00
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)0.00

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 10 Open-label Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Total Score at Week 10 Open-label Phase

BACS measures attention and speed of processing, and the test score is the total number correct. The measure of the test is the number of correct numerals where subjects write numerals 1-9 as matches to nonmeaningful symbols on a response sheet for 90 seconds, based upon a key provided to them. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and week 10 Open-label Phase

Interventioncorrect numerals (Mean)
SPD489 (Open-label Phase)2.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants In Double-blind Phase Who Maintained SANS-18 Response at Week 4 Double-blind Phase

Response is defined as reduction in total SANS score of greater than or equal to 20%. The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Week 4 Double-blind Phase

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)71.4
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)82.4

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Baseline in CDSS at Week 4 of Double-blind Phase

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT00922272)
Timeframe: Open-label Baseline and Week 4 of Double-blind Phase

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 (Double-blind Phase)-0.1
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)-0.7

[back to top]

Drug Craving

"On a weekly basis, patients completed measures of cocaine craving using the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale.~The Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale is a self report questionnaire and ranges from 0 to 100, 0 being very little to 100 being very much." (NCT00958282)
Timeframe: 14 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine17.5
Placebo28.7

[back to top]

Cocaine-positive Urine Results

At each visit, subjects provided urine samples, which were analyzed for benzoylecgonine (BE; a cocaine metabolite). BE was assessed semi-quantitatively using the PROFILE® -V MEDTOXScan® Drugs of Abuse Test System, with cocaine positive tests equaling or exceeding 150 ng/mL. (NCT00958282)
Timeframe: 14 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of BE urine tests (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine86.5
Placebo92.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCF

This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)2.5
Placebo2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

The EWPS quantifies work performance, productivity attitudes and behaviors assessing 25 items on a scale ranging from 0 (high performance) to 4 (lowest performance). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing lowest productivity. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-20.4
Placebo-15.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-5.0
Placebo-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCF

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Behavioral recognition indexInhibit subscaleShift subscaleEmotional control subscaleSelf-monitor subscaleMetacognition indexInitiate subscaleWorking memory subscalePlan/Organize subscaleTask monitor subscaleOrganization of materials subscale
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-17.4-13.5-16.2-13.8-13.8-21.1-19.4-20.1-18.7-16.8-15.2
Placebo-12.3-9.3-10.6-10.1-10.7-12.2-10.8-11.0-11.3-11.9-8.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCF

This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)2.7
Placebo1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9

The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that is a subset of the SF-36 Health Survey. The survey captures physical and mental health. Each of the 12 items is scored using various scales with a total score ranging from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health). (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Aggregate physicalAggregate mental
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-0.100.69
Placebo-0.230.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

The Q-LES-Q is a 93-item self-report questionnaire on quality of life and health. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) with a total score ranging from 93 to 465. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Physical health activitiesOverall life satisfaction
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)17.912.1
Placebo8.29.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

This measures the speed and accuracy of basic mental functions. Scores are normalized from raw scores and present an age matched score relative to other people in a normative sample. Scores are normalized with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores < 70 indicate likely deficit and impairment, and scores > 110 indicate high function and capacity. Higher scores are better. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

,
InterventionResponse scores (Mean)
Complex information speed processing indexExecutive function indexNeurocognitive index
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)8.711.011.5
Placebo3.76.02.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Week 9

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)60.6
Placebo38.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCF

The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire for assessing anxiety severity. Each item is scored using a scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a reduction in anxiety. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-4.4
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 9

The STS is an 8-question clinician-rated assessment of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and accidents. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) and summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 32. Lower scores indicate reduced suicidal tendencies. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-0.1
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-21.2
Placebo-13.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)21.740.620.314.52.90.00.0
Placebo15.923.224.634.81.40.00.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)0.07.042.345.14.21.40.0
Placebo2.88.336.148.64.20.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT00985725)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)-9.4
Placebo-5.9

[back to top]

"Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale: Long Form (CAARS:L) Inattention/Memory Problems Sub-scale."

"The CAARS:L is an assessment tool that prompts an observer to provide valuable information about the client. This instrument is helpful when considering a diagnosis of ADHD or related problem. High scores on the Inattention/Memory Problems sub-scale may indicate difficulty in concentration, difficulty planning or completing tasks, forgetfulness, absent-mindedness, and/or being disorganized.~T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to measure ratings with higher t-scores indicating greater inattention and memory problems. When a t-score is around 60, this indicates greater risk." (NCT01000064)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiont-scores (Mean)
Vyvanse51.25
Placebo56.33

[back to top]

"Assessment of Various Components of Attention, Related Cognitive Processes and ADHD Symptoms, Using the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Organization of Materials Sub-scale."

"The BRIEF-A is a standardized rating scale developed to observe everyday behaviors associated with specific domains of the executive functions in adults ages 18 to 90 years. The Organization of Materials scale measures orderliness of work, living, and storage spaces.~T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the individual's level of executive functioning on the BRIEF-A, with higher scores indicating more difficulty in a particular area." (NCT01000064)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiont-scores (Mean)
Vyvanse48.55
Placebo56.00

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index

Consists of 12 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg64.8266.56
MAS-IR 20 mg63.9063.09
Placebo64.5964.85

[back to top]

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Hyperactivity/Restlessness

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg64.2165.08
MAS-IR 20 mg63.6263.41
Placebo63.2865.74

[back to top]

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Impulsivity/Emotional Liability

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg55.4657.82
MAS-IR 20 mg54.5851.53
Placebo54.6655.78

[back to top]

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Problems With Self-Concept

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg58.7159.68
MAS-IR 20 mg59.7859.54
Placebo58.4059.68

[back to top]

Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) Subscale Total Score (T-Score): Inattention/Memory Problems

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg66.1665.78
MAS-IR 20 mg63.3964.45
Placebo64.9266.33

[back to top]

Power of Attention Score

The Power of Attention score reflects the ability to focus attention, and is calculated as the sum of the reaction time, measured in milliseconds, from 3 attention tests (Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Digit Vigilance Speed). Faster performance (lower times) reflects more intense concentration. A decrease in the Power of Attention score indicates improvement. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 14 and 16 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
half an hour prior to dosing1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose5 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose16 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg1260.71244.61315.51219.11225.91179.61212.01232.41199.31202.6
MAS-IR 20 mg1324.11307.41255.01229.61236.51251.41259.31239.31270.11255.9
Placebo1272.81253.11296.21301.01275.41330.31304.51262.11270.51270.3

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I) Score.

The CGI-I score indicates the clinician's overall assessment of improvement in function from one visit to the next. The single item is scored from 1 to 7 with anchor points ranging from very much improved (1) to very much worse (7). A decrease in score reflects an improvement in functional status. (NCT01051440)
Timeframe: week 1 and week 9

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Placebo0
Lisdexamfetamine-2

[back to top]

Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score Over Time.

The change in MADRS score from the baseline visit to the week 8 visit is reported. The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale that consists of 10 items rated on a from 0 to 6 (maximum score of 60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. An increase in score indicates a worsening of symptoms whereas a decrease indicates an improvement in symptoms. (NCT01051440)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Placebo4
Lisdexamfetamine-22

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) Score.

"The CGI-S score reflects the clinician's overall impression of the patient's functional status. The scoring for the single item ranges from 1 with an anchor of normal, not at all ill to 7 with an anchor of among the most extremely ill patients. Thus, higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms." (NCT01051440)
Timeframe: baseline and week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Placebo1
Lisdexamfetamine-2

[back to top]

Psychometric Validation of AMSES

To perform secondary psychometric validations of the AMSES using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-12

InterventionCronbach's alpha coefficients (Number)
In ClinicEvening
Overall Study.92.87

[back to top]

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder- Rating Scale (ADHS-RS)

"The ADHD-RS with adult ADHD prompts is a semi-structured scale that consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-IV symptoms of ADHD, and is designed to assess current symptomatology19.~Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).Each item on the 18-item measure is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), yielding a possible total score of 0-54. A score of 0-16 means Unlikely to have ADHD; a score of 17-23 Likely to Have ADHD ; 24 or greater-Highly Likely to have ADHD" (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Overall Study13.9

[back to top]

Correlation Between AMRS (In Clinic) and ADHD-RS

To correlate symptom rebound through a single day (assessed via the AMRS) with a global (ADHD-RS) measure of efficacy of LDX treatment. AMRS and ADHD-RD scores obtained on Day 0 and Day 12 will be correlated. The Pearson's correlation coefficients for the In-Clinic assessment will be presented for Visits 0 and 12. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Visits 0 and 12

InterventionPearson's correlation coefficient (Number)
Treatment Arm.66

[back to top]

Correlation Between In-Clinic AMRS and ASRS v.1.1 Symptom Checklist

To correlate symptom rebound through a single day (assessed via the AMRS) with a self assessment of ADHD Symptoms. A Pearson's correlation coefficient will be presented. AMRS and self assessment of ADHD scores obtained on Day 0 and Day 12 will be correlated. The Pearson's correlation coefficients for the In-Clinic assessment will be presented for Visits 0 and 12. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionPearson's correlation coefficient (Number)
Overall Study.83

[back to top]

Change in Correlation Between AMRS and TASS

To correlate symptom rebound through a single day (assessed via the AMRS) with a time-sensitive (TASS) measure of efficacy of LDX treatment. A Pearson's correlation coefficient will be presented. AMRS and TASS scores obtained on Day 0 and Day 12 will be correlated. The Pearson's correlation coefficients for the In-Clinic assessment will be presented for Visits 0 and 12. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Visits 0 and 12

InterventionPearson's correlation coefficient (Number)
In ClinicEvening
Overall Study.96.96

[back to top]

Change in Measure of Smoothness of Effect Using Adult ADHD Medications Smoothness of Effect Scale (AMSES)

The Adult ADHD Medication Smoothness of Effect Scale (AMSES) is a 6-item, frequency-based, self-report scale that was recently developed to assess the consistency and duration of effect of ADHD medication throughout the day. The AMSES compares the effectiveness of ADHD medication shortly after dosing with the effectiveness later in the day. Respondents are asked to rate how frequently the effective-ness of their medication was the same 2 hr post-dose as it was 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hr post-dose on a 0 to 4 scale (0 = never, 1 = rarel, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = very often). In addition, respondents rate how frequently the delivery of their medication was consistent and smooth throughout the day on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (never) to 100 (very often). (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Visits 0 and 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
In ClinicEvening
Overall Study1.31-3.34

[back to top]

Change in Symptom Rebound Score Using the Adult ADHD Medication Rebound Scale (AMRS).

To evaluate the symptom rebound throughout a single day (assessed via the AMRS) with LDX treatment. Scoring on the AMRS based on 38 items, each scored 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe). The lowest scored units on a scale for 1 individual is 0, the highest 114. The scores reported below are Mean scores for 33 patients analyzed. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
In ClinicEvening
Overall Study27.9926.9

[back to top]

Psychometric Validation of AMRS

To perform secondary psychometric validations of the AMRS using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. (NCT01070394)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-12

InterventionCronbach's alpha coefficients (Number)
In ClinicEvening
Overall Study.99.97

[back to top]

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

The Fatigue Severity Scale is designed to measure the impact of fatigue on the life of the subject. It is a nine-question likert scale survey with a raw score range of 0-63. Scores of 36 and above indicate significant fatigue. In this study, we compared the mean change in the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline to endpoint between LDX and placebo treated patients. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group20.92
Control Group5.00

[back to top]

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)

"The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is an assessment that quantifies the impact of fibromyalgia on an individual, including questions on pain level, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and psychological distress, among others. The score range is 0 to 100, with higher number indicating higher Fibromyalgia severity/impact.~Below, we compare the mean change in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) from baseline to week 6 between LDX and placebo treated patients." (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group20.90
Control Group8.83

[back to top]

Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire

The McGill Pain Questionniare (Short Form) consists of 15 pain descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale. 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The sum of the intensity scores of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors are added for a total score. The score range is 0-45. In this study, we compared the change in the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) from baseline to week 6 between LDX and placebo treated patients. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate10.38
Control Group2.45

[back to top]

Hamiliton Anxiety Inventory

The Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 14-items clinician-rated scale designed to measure anxiety severity. Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 (symptom not persent) to 4 (severe symptom). The total range is 0-56. A total score of less than 17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 indicates mild to moderate severity, and a score of 25-30 indicates moderate to severe symptoms. In this study, we compared the mean change in the Hamilton Anxiety scale from baseline to week 6 between LDX and placebo-treated patients. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group11.31
Control Group6.18

[back to top]

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS)

The Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) is an 18-item scale based on DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. Each item is rated using a likert scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a total score range of 0-54, with higher scores indicating more symptoms/severity. In this study, we compared mean change in ADHD-RS total score from baseline to endpoint of the study. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group18.17
Control Group8.73

[back to top]

BRIEF-A

The BRIEF-A (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-- Adult Form) is comprised of the following sub-scales: Metacognition Index, Behavioral Regulation Index, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organziation of Material. These subscales are summed to provide the GEC or Global Executive Composite. Listed below are the mean improvement scores on the GEC index from baseline to endpoint. The Global Executive Composite raw score range is 70-182, with higher scores indicating more compromised executive functioning. The scores listed in the table depict mean improvement on the GEC from the beginning to the end of the study. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every 2 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group21.38
Control Group3.36

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression (Severity)

The Clinical Global Impression (Severity) is a one-item clinician-rated measure. The item is a likert scale on which the clinician rates the subject based on perceived severity of psychopathology, with higher numbers indicating higher severity. In this study, we compared the mean change in severity from baseline to endpoint. (NCT01071044)
Timeframe: Every visit

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group1.92
Control Group.64

[back to top]

Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Scores

PVT assesses behavioral alertness. Subjects were required to respond to a visual stimulus by pressing a button on a mechanical device and the reaction time was measured. Higher scores indicate attention lapses. (NCT01096680)
Timeframe: Over a period of 12 hours

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 20 mg243.6
SPD489 50 mg234.8
SPD489 70 mg243.5
Armodafinil 250 mg243.7
Placebo270.2

[back to top]

Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT)

"The MWT was conducted to determine the subjects' ability to stay awake. Subjects sat in a darkened room and were told to stay awake as long as possible during the 30 minute session. This is an indicator of how well you are able to function and remain alert in quiet times of inactivity. Higher times are better." (NCT01096680)
Timeframe: Over a period of 8 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 20 mg23.3
SPD489 50 mg27.9
SPD489 70 mg29.3
Armodafinil 250 mg27.6
Placebo15.3

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Scores

The KSS is a 9-point scale on which the subject rates sleepiness from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy/fighting sleep). Lower score is better. (NCT01096680)
Timeframe: Over a period of 15 hours

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489 20 mg4.7
SPD489 50 mg4.0
SPD489 70 mg3.6
Armodafinil 250 mg4.7
Placebo5.2

[back to top]

PVT Scores by Timepoint

PVT assesses behavioral alertness. Subjects were required to respond to a visual stimulus by pressing a button on a mechanical device and the reaction time was measured. Higher scores indicate attention lapses. (NCT01096680)
Timeframe: Over a period of 12 hours

,,,,
Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
9:15pm11:15pm1:15am3:15am5:15am7:15am9:15am
Armodafinil 250 mg235.5229.3233.0242.5249.5259.1256.7
Placebo241.3249.3256.7280.7291.6295.5276.1
SPD489 20 mg231.6232.6231.5243.6253.4257.9254.8
SPD489 50 mg233.2230.9231.5227.4237.7242.6240.0
SPD489 70 mg234.9231.2230.2240.7242.5259.2265.9

[back to top]

KSS Scores by Timepoint

The KSS is a 9-point scale on which the subject rates sleepiness from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy/fighting sleep). Lower score is better. (NCT01096680)
Timeframe: Over a period of 15 hours

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
7:50pm8:50pm9:50pm10:50pm11:50pm12:50am1:50am2:50am3:50am4:50am5:50am6:50am7:50am8:50am9:50am10:50am
Armodafinil 250 mg2.62.73.12.93.43.33.84.75.56.06.36.76.66.05.76.0
Placebo2.83.03.13.73.94.54.75.76.46.67.17.37.25.45.96.2
SPD489 20 mg2.92.72.92.83.23.64.04.55.26.16.76.76.55.95.66.2
SPD489 50 mg3.02.73.13.23.12.93.23.73.94.45.15.75.55.04.65.4
SPD489 70 mg2.62.62.62.42.52.63.03.53.74.24.64.84.74.44.55.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AIM-A Multi-Item Scales of Living With ADHD and General Well-being Score at up to 10 Weeks

The AIM-A was developed to assess impact of core ADHD symptoms on daily functioning and quality of life. For multi-item scales, subjects respond to items using a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Scores were computed by deriving the mean of the item sets and transforming the scale score on a continuum from 0 to 100 using a standard formula. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Living with ADHDGeneral Well-being
Placebo4.99.0
SPD48914.019.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks

BRIEF-A clinical subscales items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
InhibitShiftEmotional controlSelf-monitorInitiateWorking memoryPlan/OrganizeTask monitorOrganization of materials
Placebo-9.5-7.8-5.7-8.4-8.6-11.9-9.9-10.8-7.6
SPD489-17.8-14.5-10.9-16.6-17.9-23.2-20.8-20.1-16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) With Adult Prompts Total Score at up to 10 Weeks

The ADHD-RS consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. Lower scores indicate reduction in symptoms. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489-21.4
Placebo-10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S) ADHD Index T-score at up to 10 Weeks

The CAARS-O:S is an assessment tool with prompts provided to an observer who describes ADHD-related symptoms in an adult subject. The 26-item scale is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much, very frequently). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489-11.3
Placebo-5.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at up to 10 Weeks

BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
SPD489-22.3
Placebo-11.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at up to 10 Weeks

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks post-dose

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
SPD48978.5
Placebo34.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks

The AIM-A was developed to assess impact of core ADHD symptoms on daily functioning and quality of life. For multi-item scales, subjects respond to items using a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Scores were computed by deriving the mean of the item sets and transforming the scale score on a continuum from 0 to 100 using a standard formula. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Performance and Daily FunctioningImpact of symptoms: Daily InterferenceImpact of symptoms: Bother/ConcernRelationships/Communication
Placebo17.215.715.813.4
SPD48938.830.629.321.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks

AAQoL is a validated 29-item scale consisting of 4 subscales. The AAQoL yields a total score and 4 subscale scores. Subjects rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). These scores are then transformed to a 0-100 point scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Life ProductivityPsychological HealthLife OutlookRelationshipsTotal Score
Placebo17.07.26.09.811.1
SPD48938.019.318.517.125.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AIM-A Quality of Life Questions 1 and 4 Scores at up to 10 Weeks

Question 1: 'On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the overall quality of life right now?' It is rated on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Higher scores representing a more positive rating. Question 4: 'How much do you agree with this statement: Over the past few weeks, I've had more good days than bad days?' This is rated on a scale of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Lower scores represent better quality of life. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Question 1Question 4
Placebo1.0-0.4
SPD4891.6-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks

The CAARS-O:S is an assessment tool with prompts provided to an observer who describes ADHD-related symptoms in an adult subject. The 26-item scale is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much, very frequently). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Inattention/Memory ProblemsHyperactivity/RestlessnessImpulsivity/Emotional LiabilityProblems with Self-concept
Placebo-4.9-5.0-4.0-3.3
SPD489-10.0-9.1-8.0-7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks

BRIEF-A clinical subscales items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
InhibitShiftEmotional controlSelf-monitorInitiateWorking memoryPlan/OrganizeTask monitorOrganization of materials
Placebo-5.8-4.3-4.6-4.6-3.2-5.7-5.0-3.4-3.0
SPD489-10.2-9.1-5.9-6.8-8.6-12.0-9.9-9.7-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to10 weeks

,
InterventionT-scores (Least Squares Mean)
Global Executive CompositeBehavioral Regulation IndexMetacognition Index
Placebo-5.3-5.5-4.6
SPD489-10.2-8.6-10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Global Executive Composite was reported as the Primary Outcome. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment. (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

,
InterventionT-scores (Mean)
Behavioral Regulation IndexMetacognition Index
Placebo-9.2-11.2
SPD489-17.5-22.8

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Placebo00042.749.38.00
SPD48900048.138.013.90

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT01101022)
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks post-dose

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Placebo6.716.010.737.325.34.00
SPD48913.938.021.515.28.92.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at 9 Weeks - LOCF

ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in ADHD symptomology. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: Baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-26.1
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride-19.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale - Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Global Score at Up to 9 Weeks

The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale with each item scored from 0 (never/not at all) to 3 (very often/very much). Mean scores range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-0.35
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride-0.27

[back to top]

Health Utilities Index-2 (HUI-2) Scores at Up to 9 Weeks

HUI is used to describe health status and to obtain utility scores by collecting data using one or more questionnaires in formats selected to match the specific study design criteria. Scoring ranges from 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). Higher scores represent better health status. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: up to 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate0.920
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride0.922

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate81.7
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride63.6

[back to top]

Time to First Response

Time to first response was defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) value of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) first recorded following first dose of investigational product. CGI-I consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate12.0
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride21.0

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal ideationSuicidal behavior
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride00
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate00

[back to top]

Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale - Clinician (UKU-SERS-Clin) With Side Effects Scores >=1

UKU-SERS-Clin is composed of 48 items each of which asks about a single side effect. Each side effect is rated based on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no or doubtful presence) to 3 (the least favorable rating). The rating is independent of whether the symptom is regarded as related to the investigational product. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Weight LossReduced Duration of SleepAsthenia/Lassitude/Increased FatigabilityTension/Inner UnrestNausea/VomitingSleepiness/SedationReduced SalivationHeadache-Tension HeadacheConcentration DifficultiesFailing MemoryDepressionIncreased Duration of SleepIncreased Dream ActivityEmotional IndifferenceDystoniaRigidityHypokinesia/AkinesiaHyperkinesia LogicTremorAkathisiaParaesthesiasAccomodation DisturbancesIncreased SalivationDiarrheaConstipationMicturition DisturbancesPolyuria/PolydipsiaOrthostatic DizzinessPalpitations/TachycardiaIncreased Tendency to SweatingRash-MorbiliformRash-PetechialRash-UrticarialRash-Cannot be ClassifiedPruritusWeight GainHeadache-MigraineHeadache-Other Forms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride191629222635617922110128101103120229512955101270210
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate4629252019161615751061231200123010169031013011141211

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) Total Score at Up to 9 Weeks

The BPRS-C characterizes psychopathology. A total of 21 items are rated on a scale from 0 (not present) to 6 (extremely severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 126. A decrease in score indicates a reduction in psychopathology. (NCT01106430)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-10.7
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride-7.9

[back to top]

Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)

self rated measure of global impairment of adult participants derived from the child IRS. The IRS-A assesses impairment overall and in specific domains, including interpersonal relationships, academic performance, and self-esteem, and includes adult-specific domains of functioning, such as employment and romantic relationships. The IRS-A assesses current problems and need for treatment. Each subscale is rated from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem).At endpoint, the medication group (N=11) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). Overall Impairment is its own subscale and not a composite score of the others. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Impairment with peersImpairment with parentsGeneral family impairmentAcademic impairmentSelf-esteem impairmentOverall impairment
Placebo Arm2.382.462.773.602.773.00
Treatment Arm1.911.302.271.832.002.55

[back to top]

Barkley Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ)

Self completed by adult participants. Measures their child's functioning in the evening by asking them to report whether or not their child had problems in developmentally important areas. Number of problems per child are counted and counts are then averaged for each group with higher numbers representing more problems. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=10). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionnumber of child problems endorsed (Mean)
Placebo Arm9.30
Treatment Arm8.67

[back to top]

ADHD Severity Clinical Global Impressions Severity Subscale

clinician rated measure of ADHD symptom severity in adult participants. The severity subscale is scored from 1 (normal) to 7 (extremely ill).At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm3.78
Treatment Arm2.36

[back to top]

Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale

rates 13 potential adverse events of central nervous system stimulant medications on a 0-3 likert scale with 0=none 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe severity. Form completed by participants at end of med optimization phase. Mean severity rating then averaged across 13 categories. This compares mean side effect severity at unmedicated baseline state vs. on optimal dose at week 3. Analysis includes all participants completing medication optimization. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and end of dose optimization phase/week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Unmedicated0.04
Optimal Dose of Medication0.26

[back to top]

Resting Blood Pressure

Measured at rest at last assessment visit using an automated blood pressure machine; results reported in mmHG. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=10). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
systolic BPdiastolic BP
Placebo Arm123.4076.10
Treatment Arm122.3375.11

[back to top]

Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale - Percent Present for All Reported Adverse Events Occurring at a Rate of 5% or More

Self report of side effects measured during dose titration using the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale. Consists of 13 items each rated using 0(none) to 3 (severe) scales. Items endorsed as 1 (mild) or above were counted as present. Information on additional adverse events not part of the PSERS was collected by direct interview of the participants. All side effects occurring at a frequency of 5% or more are reported. Initial side effect data is reported for all participants entering pre-randomization med optimization phase who took medication (n=36) vs those formally enrolled (N=27). Also, side effect data for the med titration phase is entered per dose rather than per participant. For example, a person trying the 30, 50 and 70mg dose is entered is entered 4 times (no med as well) vs. just once. This is why baseline N is higher than for other outcomes collected at weeks 4 and 8 where data was only available for those completing the pre-randomization med optimization phase (N=27). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: end of medication optimization phase/week 4

,,,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Motor ticsBuccal-lingual movementpicking at skinworried/anxiousdull, tired, listlessheadachesstomachachescrabby, irritiabletearful, sad, depressedsocially withdrawnloss of appetitetrouble sleepingdry mouth
30 mg Lisdexamfetamine019.411.136.116.736.116.727.813.98.352.830.630.6
50 mg Lisdexamfetamine028.614.314.39.528.64.823.819.00.066.733.338.1
70 mg Lisdexamfetamine11.823.55.917.611.829.429.423.511.80.070.635.370.5
No Medication02.613.213.210.55.30.010.57.95.30.010.50.0

[back to top]

Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBD)

Parent ratings of their child's symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD). Measure consists of 45 items each rated on a Likert scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Items are averaged to form adhd-inattention, adhd-hyperactive/impulsive, ODD, and CD scores.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication. ADHD subscale consists of 20 items with range of 0 to 60. ODD subscale consists of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. CD subscale consists of 15 items with range of 0 to 45. For all subscales, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ADHD-hyperactive/impulsive symptom scoreADHD-inattentive symptom scoreODD symptom scoreCD symptom score
Optimal Dose of Medication1.341.851.120.18
Unmedicated1.552.111.170.16

[back to top]

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The SDS consists of 3 self rated items assessing the degree to which symptoms affect work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) scale. Items were averaged into an overall disability score with range of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more severe disability.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and week 4

Interventionunits on a 0 to 10 scale (Mean)
Unmedicated6.26
Optimal Dose of Medication3.17

[back to top]

Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)

measures global functioning of child rated by the parent who was the participant in the study. The IRS is a 7 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance. Each subscale including overall severity is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem) with higher scores indicating more impairment. At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Impairment with peersImpairment with siblingsImpairment interferes with parents' relationshipAcademic impairmentSelf-esteem impairmentGeneral family impairmentOverall severity
Placebo Arm2.622.173.153.153.003.082.62
Treatment Arm2.202.303.102.603.402.902.70

[back to top]

Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)

"Parent ratings of their child's functioning and need for treatment in developmentally important domains. Ratings are completed using visual-analogue scales that are anchored at the low end by no problems / no need for treatment and at the high end by extreme problem / definitely needs treatment. Visual analogue ratings for each subscale were converted to 0 to 6 scales with higher values indicating greater impairment and lower values indicating less impairment for each subscale.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and week 4

,
Interventionunits on a 0 to 6 scale (Mean)
Child's peer relationship impairmentChild's sibling relationship impairmentChild's parent relationship impairmentChild's academic impairmentChild's self-esteem impairmentChild's family impairmentChild's overall impairment
Optimal Dose of Medication2.212.683.793.293.543.873.42
Unmedicated2.752.823.673.753.924.003.63

[back to top]

Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages

Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Percentages of behaviors as a function of total verbalizations (for praise, negative talk, demanding) or as a function of commands and questions (for impatient and responsive) were computed.Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of behaviors (Mean)
Parent praiseParent negative talkParent demandingnessParent impatientParent responsive
Medication - Homework Task2.821.121.734.163.8
Medication Non-academic Task5.712.612.726.377.3
Placebo - Homework Task1.25.321.842.469.8
Placebo - Non-academic Task6.05.923.538.789.7

[back to top]

Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)

"Measures child's interactions with peers and adults. Items rated using Likert scales that range from 0 (never) to 2 (often).At week 8, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=11). There are two subscales: Problem Behaviors (18 items rated between 0-2 for total score range of 0 to 36) and Social Skills (40 items rated 0-2 with range for total score of 0-80). The total scores for these scales are reported as standard scores, with a population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. For problem behavior higher scores indicate worse behavior whereas for social skills, higher scores indicate more social (or better behavior)." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionstandard scores (Mean)
Social Skills Total Standard ScoreProblem Behavior Total Standard Score
Placebo Arm86.64113.81
Treatment Arm89.90111.80

[back to top]

Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages

Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors with each parent-child dyad counted as one participant. Percentages of behaviors as a function of total verbalizations (for praise, negative talk, demanding) or as a function of commands and questions (for impatient and responsive) were computed. This outcome was part of period I- the within subject comparison of all participating subjects once on placebo (n=26) and once with all subjects on active medication (N=26). (the 27th participant completed this phase but partial data was lost due to mechanical failure with video equipment so their data was not included). All adult participants received both placebo and active medication in this phase that comprised all of period 1. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of behaviors (Mean)
Parent praiseParent negative talkParent demandingnessParent impatientParent responsive
Medication - Homework Task3.614.419.331.275.9
Medication Non-academic Task2.29.119.232.679.8
Placebo - Homework Task2.64.724.139.283.2
Placebo - Non-academic Task3.04.025.742.574.8

[back to top]

Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Counts

Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Average number of behaviors per group were computed. Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,,,
Interventionbehaviors (Mean)
VerbalizationsCommandsinappropriate child behavior
Medication - Homework Task53.811.03.8
Medication Non-academic Task40.14.91.5
Placebo - Homework Task67.214.56.8
Placebo - Non-academic Task42.19.01.4

[back to top]

Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS)

Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors with each parent-child dyad counted as one participant. Average number of behaviors per group were computed.This outcome was part of period I- the within subject comparison of all participating subjects once on placebo (n=26) and once with all subjects on active medication (N=26). (the 27th participant completed this phase but partial data was lost due to mechanical failure with video equipment so their data was not included). All adult participants received both placebo and active medication in this phase that comprised all of period 1. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)

,,,
Interventionbehaviors (Mean)
VerbalizationsCommandsinappropriate child behavior
Medication - Homework Task45.28.72.5
Medication Non-academic Task48.68.33.8
Placebo - Homework Task61.715.46.1
Placebo - Non-academic Task58.214.83.3

[back to top]

Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale (DBD)

measures externalizing symptoms in children.measures externalizing symptoms in children completed by their primary caretaker who was a participant in the study. The DBD (Pelham et al., 1992) assessed DSM symptoms of ADHD, ODD, and CD from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The DBD includes symptoms of DSM-III and DSM-IV ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD).At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=12). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
InattentionHyperactive/ImpulsiveOppositional-defiantConduct disorder
Placebo Arm1.641.251.040.17
Treatment Arm1.601.090.760.15

[back to top]

Brown Attention Deficit Scale (BAADS)

"Measures executive functioning using 40 items each rated using a Likert Scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 3 (almost daily). Activation, Attention and effort subscales are 9 items each with range of 0-27. Affect scale is 7 items (range 0-21), memory is 6 items (range 0-18) and total score is 40 items (range 0-120). All raw scores are then reported as T scores based on normative data with higher T scores indicating worse executive functioning. At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13)." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventiont score (Mean)
Activation Scale t-scoreAttention Scale t-scoreEffort scale t-scoreAffect scale t-scoreMemory scale t-scoreTotal scale t-score
Placebo Arm73.3875.5472.4663.4674.3876.08
Treatment Arm66.465.1061.2053.2013.7963.30

[back to top]

Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)

"measures change in parenting practices.The APQ is a 42-item measure (each item ranges from 1/always to 5/never) on which parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they implement the following parenting practices: involvement (10 items range 10-50- higher scores mean more parental involvement), positive parenting (6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater use of praise), poor monitoring/supervision (10 items with range of 10 to 50 and higher scores indicate less supervision/monitoring), inconsistent discipline(6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater problems with inconsistent discipline), and corporal punishment (3 items with range of 3-15 and greater scores indicate more use of corporal punishment). Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Items summed into composite scales.~Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Parent InvolvementPositive parentingPoor monitoring and poor supervisionInconsistent disciplineCorporal punishment
Optimal Dose of Medication38.8225.5813.5814.624.42
Unmedicated37.8325.4214.2515.794.79

[back to top]

Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)

"measures change in parenting practices.The APQ is a 42-item measure (each item ranges from 1/always to 5/never) on which parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they implement the following parenting practices: involvement (10 items range 10-50- higher scores mean more parental involvement), positive parenting (6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater use of praise), poor monitoring/supervision (10 items with range of 10 to 50 and higher scores indicate less supervision/monitoring), inconsistent discipline(6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater problems with inconsistent discipline), and corporal punishment (3 items with range of 3-15 and greater scores indicate more use of corporal punishment). Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Items summed into composite scales.~At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13)." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Positive parentingParental involvementPoor monitoring/supervisionInconsistent disciplineCorporal punishment use
Placebo Arm24.8539.3812.2312.464.69
Treatment Arm24.3337.7812.3314.223.89

[back to top]

Adult ADHD Rating Scale Completed at the End of the Med Optimization Phase

Measures change in all DSM IV ADHD symptoms on a 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) scale. All information obtained during clinician interview of patient. Inattention and hyperactive/impulsive subscales each consist of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. Total Score consists of all 18 items (sum of two subscales) rated 0 to 3 with range of 0 to 54. For all, higher scores indicate more symptoms. (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: baseline and end of med optimization phase/week 4

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Inattention SymptomsHyperactive/Impulsive SymptomsTotal symptoms
Optimal Dose of Medication9.778.0017.77
Unmedicated23.1217.8140.85

[back to top]

Adult ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS)

measures change in all DSM (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual) IV ADHD symptoms on a 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) scale. Inattention and hyperactive/impulsive subscales each consist of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. Total Score consists of all 18 items rated 0 to 3 with range of 0 to 54. For all, higher scores indicate more symptoms. All information obtained during clinician interview of patient. At endpoint, the medication group (N=11) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
InattentionHyperactive/ImpulsiveTotal Score
Placebo Arm17.8514.7732.62
Treatment Arm8.825.6414.46

[back to top]

Weight

Weight measured on calibrated scale; participant measured without shoes or heavy clothing (jackets, sweaters, etc...). reported in kilograms.At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=11). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo Arm76.0
Treatment Arm69.62

[back to top]

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The SDS consists of 3 self rated items assessing the degree to which symptoms affect work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) scale. Items were averaged into an overall disability score with range of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more severe disability. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm4.36
Treatment Arm2.26

[back to top]

Resting Pulse

measured at last assessment visit when at rest using an automated blood pressure machine; results reported in beats per minute. At endpoint, the medication group (N=8) was compared to the placebo group (N=9). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Placebo Arm74.44
Treatment Arm77.13

[back to top]

Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale Mean Severity Rating.

rates 13 potential adverse events of Central Nervous System (CNS) stimulants on a 0-3 likert scale with 0=none 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe severity. Form completed by participants. Mean severity rating then averaged across 13 categories.At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm0.28
Treatment Arm0.26

[back to top]

Parenting Stress Index (PSI)--Total Stress

measures change in stress of parent child interactions and completed by the participant. The PSI is a measure of the source and degree of parenting stress (Abidin, 1995), which contains 120 items which are rated on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) scale. 101 of these items are used to compute a total stress score (reported below) as the other 19 report on specific life stressors. Range is 101 to 505, for which higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm241.54
Treatment Arm262.67

[back to top]

Parenting Locus of Control (PLC)

"self completed parenting measure of the degree to which parents feel they can influence their child's behavior. Measure consists of 25 items each rated using a Likert scales that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Range is 25 to 125 with higher scores indicating greater parental control over their child's behavior (desired outcome). At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13)." (NCT01127607)
Timeframe: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm79.00
Treatment Arm80.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Dysphoric Apathy/Retardation Sub-factor (MDAR) of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 4 Weeks.

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Dysphoric Apathy Retardation subfactor (MDAR) is a 5-item subscale of the clinician-administered 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). MDAR score can range from 0-30 with a higher score representing a greater severity of depressive symptoms. (NCT01148979)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Mean MDAR scoreWeek 4 Mean MDAR scoreChange from BL in mean MDAR score
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse)13.466.36-7.08
Placebo Adjunct12.579.08-3.49

[back to top]

AUC of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR010673.9
Venlafaxine XR + LDX10738.010342.2

[back to top]

AUC of d-Amphetamine

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR1143.41135.4
Venlafaxine XR + LDX01049.2

[back to top]

AUC of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR08061.3
Venlafaxine XR + LDX8363.36955.1

[back to top]

AUC of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR02839.7
Venlafaxine XR + LDX2900.03202.6

[back to top]

Cmax of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR0603.49
Venlafaxine XR + LDX624.56588.68

[back to top]

Cmax of d-Amphetamine

d-Amphetamine is the active isomer of Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (SPD489) and is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR88.9188.91
Venlafaxine XR + LDX085.27

[back to top]

Cmax of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine

Venlafaxine, after oral administration, is metabolized in the liver to an active metabolite, o-Desmethylvenlafaxine. (NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR0413.71
Venlafaxine XR + LDX420.55371.54

[back to top]

Cmax of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Venlafaxine Hydrochloride is the active ingredient of Effexor XR (NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR0198.5
Venlafaxine XR + LDX210.98228.89

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 39 days

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineUp to 39 Days
LDX + Venlafaxine XR73.6977.85
Venlafaxine XR + LDX73.6880.45

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (SPD489) itself is inactive, but following oral administration is converted to the active isomer, d-amphetamine, that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR49.0649.84
Venlafaxine XR + LDX050.77

[back to top]

Pulse Rate

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 39 days

,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
BaselineUp to 39 Days
LDX + Venlafaxine XR66.2477.47
Venlafaxine XR + LDX66.5581.72

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 39 days

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineUp to 39 Days
LDX + Venlafaxine XR110.17117.82
Venlafaxine XR + LDX110.48121.51

[back to top]

Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR1.11.1
Venlafaxine XR + LDX01.0

[back to top]

Tmax of Composite (Venlafaxine + o-Desmethylvenlafaxine)

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR07.1
Venlafaxine XR + LDX7.37.0

[back to top]

Tmax of d-Amphetamine

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR3.53.2
Venlafaxine XR + LDX03.1

[back to top]

Tmax of o-Desmethylvenlafaxine

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR08.5
Venlafaxine XR + LDX7.97.9

[back to top]

Tmax of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR06.0
Venlafaxine XR + LDX6.45.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

(NCT01235338)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 30 (24 hour sampling)

,
Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Day 15Day 30
LDX + Venlafaxine XR65.563.9
Venlafaxine XR + LDX060.8

[back to top]

4-Week Binge Response

Subjects are free from binge episodes for 4 weeks. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Last 28 days on study

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo13
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg22
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg27
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Score at Week 11

The Eating Inventory also known as the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire is a 51-item self-reported questionnaire intended to assess 3 dimensions of eating behavior: cognitive restraint of eating, disinhibition, and hunger. Cognitive restraint of eating consists of 20 items, disinhibition consists of 16 items, and hunger consists of 15 items. Each item scores either 0 or 1 point for a total score of 0-20 for cognitive restraint of eating, 0-16 for disinhibition, and 0-15 for hunger. A higher score is better for cognitive restraint of eating and lower scores are better for disinhibition and hunger. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cognitive restraint of eatingDisinhibitionHunger
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg4.4-5.6-5.3
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg3.8-6.3-6.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg4.3-7.2-7.8
Placebo2.5-3.8-3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Score at Week 11

The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that is a subset of the SF-36 Health Survey. The survey captures physical and mental health. There are 8 subscales. Four of the subscales has one-item each; the other 4 have two-items each. For each subscale, a mean value was first computed and transformed to a position on a scale ranging from 0-100 (Z-transformation). The aggregate total scores are then transformed into a mean value ranging from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health). (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Aggregate Physical ScoreAggregate Mental Score
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg2.65.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg2.45.5
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg3.94.9
Placebo1.34.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Up to 11 Weeks

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: up to 11 weeks

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg55.426.21.513.81.501.5
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg60.923.46.37.81.600
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg65.120.611.13.2000
Placebo37.119.412.924.26.500

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill) (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, not at all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg00054.530.312.13.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg003.159.429.76.31.6
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg01.61.642.947.66.30
Placebo001.656.529.011.31.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) Total Score at Week 11

The BIS-11 is a self-reported 30-item questionnaire that measures impulsiveness using a 4-point Likert scale (rarely/never = 1, occasionally = 2, often = 3, almost always/always = 4). A Total Impulsivity score is calculated by summing the scores for each item. Possible scores range from 30 - 120. Higher scores indicate increased impulsiveness. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.1
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-5.8
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-5.2
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-6.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 11

The BES is a 16-item self-reported questionnaire that is designed to assess behavioral, affective, and attitudinal components of the subjective experience of binge eating. The items are summed, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 46. A score of 27 or higher indicates severe binge-eating problems, and a score of 17 or lower designates no binge-eating problems. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-12.2
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-16.1
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-17.6
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-20.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Week 11

The HAM-A is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology. It consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) with a total score range of 0-56, where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity, and 25-30 moderate to severe, and 31-56 severe anxiety. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.5
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-0.9
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-1.1
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11

Binge day is defined as a day during which at least 1 binge episode occurs. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

InterventionLog days (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.23
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-1.24
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-1.49
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-1.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Week 11

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.7
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-1.9
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-1.3
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 Weeks

The number of binge episodes per week as assessed by clinical interview based on subject diary. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 11 weeks

InterventionBinge Episodes (Mean)
Placebo-4.07
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-4.57
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-5.10
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-5.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (YBOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 11

The YBOCS-BE measures the obsession of binge-eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge-eating behaviors. The scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). Total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0-7 is sub-clinical; 8-15 is mild; 16-23 is moderate; 24-31 is severe; and 32-40 is extreme. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 11

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-12.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-15.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-15.3
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-17.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Up to 11 Weeks

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Up to 11 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo64.5
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg84.6
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg90.6
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg93.7

[back to top]

1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The 1-week binge response was defined as either a 1-week remission (a 100% reduction of binge episodes from baseline [ie, a cessation of binge eating behavior]), or a marked response (75 to <100% reduction in binge episodes from baseline), or a moderate response (50 to <75% reduction in binge episodes from baseline), or a negative/minimal response (<50% reduction in binge episodes from baseline). The 1-week response was determined at the end of the study utilizing a LOCF approach. (NCT01291173)
Timeframe: Last 7 days on study

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 week remissionMarked responseModerate responseNegative/Minimal response
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg2820810
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg332443
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg352314
Placebo23151311

[back to top]

NYU Paragraph Recall Task

Subjects hear 2 brief narratives, each containing 19-21 informational bits, and are asked to recall as many details as possible immediately after hearing each paragraph (A and B) and again following a 30 minute delay. Subjects receive credit for each informational bit recalled verbatim. Different paragraphs were read at each assessment. The maximum number of correct responses for paragraph A is 19 and the maximum number of correct responses for paragraph B is 21. (NCT01324024)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of first Intervention (4 weeks) and end of second Intervention (4 weeks)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Immediate paragraph recall AImmediate paragraph recall BDelayed paragraph recall ADelayed paragraph recall B
Baseline7.096.384.687.81
Lisdexamfetamine7.487.455.909.77
Placebo7.006.754.948.47

[back to top]

Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS)

The BADDS questionnaire is a clinician administered questionnaire that assesses the frequency and severity of five clusters of symptoms reflective of executive dysfunction reported by individuals with ADHD. Participants are asked to rate the frequency and severity of a symptom on a scale from 0 to 3, with 0 meaning that the problem described does not relate to them and 3 indicating that the problem is very true for them and occurs almost daily. The range of severity for the total BADDS score is 0 to 120, with scores of 55 and above being consistent with full-syndrome ADHD. (NCT01324024)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of first Intervention (4 weeks) and end of second Intervention (4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline35.7
Lisdexamfetamine21.2
Sugar Pill29.8

[back to top]

Penn Continuous Performance Test

The Penn Continuous Performance Test is a measure of visual attention and vigilance. In this task, a series of red vertical and horizontal lines flash in a digital numeric frame. The participant must press the spacebar whenever the lines form complete numbers or complete letters. The minimum to maximum score range for this task is 0-60 correct responses, with 60 being a perfect score. This data presented in the outcome measure table reflects the total number of correct responses. (NCT01324024)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of first Intervention (4 weeks) and end of second Intervention (4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline53.29
Lisdexamfetamine56.37
Sugar Pill56.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

BMI was calculated as (weight [kilogram] per height [square meter]). (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionkilogram per square meter (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionkilogram(s) (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRSC) Total Scores at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

The BPRS-C that was designed to provide a characterization of the child and adolescent psychopathology, was used to monitor participant's safety. The BPRS-C assessed 7 independent factors (3 items each), for a total of 21 items that represented behavioural disorders, depression, thinking disturbance, psychomotor excitation, withdrawal retardation, anxiety, and organicity. Each item was rated using a 7-point scale including 0 (not present), 1 (very mild), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (moderately severe), 5 (severe), and 6 (extremely severe). Total score is the sum of each item score; range from 0 to 126. Higher score indicated worse psychology. (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-10.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale permits a global evaluation of the participants' severity and improvement over time. This assessment will help guide the clinician on dosing adjustments. The CGI has been used extensively in clinical studies of ADHD. CGI-S was a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants), evaluated by the Investigator. (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal, not all illBorderline mentally illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate739767391742

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale permits a global evaluation of the participants' severity and improvement over time. This assessment will help guide the clinician on dosing adjustments. The CGI has been used extensively in clinical studies of ADHD. CGI-I was a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), evaluated by the Investigator. (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate1419228201350

[back to top]

Number of Participants With All Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. It included both serious and non-serious adverse event. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs were defined as treatment-emergent if they started or worsened during the period between the day of a participant's first dose of investigational product in this study and the 3 days following cessation of treatment. (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 2 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAESerious TEAE
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate28228

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

ADHD-RS-IV consisted of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria, completed by the Investigator. Each item was scored from a range of 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54. The 18 items were grouped into 2 sub-scales: hyperactivity/impulsivity (even number items 2-18 with score range of 0 to 27) and inattention (odd number items 1-17 with score range of 0 to 27). Higher scores depicted worse symptoms. (NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-25.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QT Interval at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Height at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventioncentimeter(s) (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate6.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last On-treatment Assessment (LOTA)

(NCT01328756)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), LOTA (Week 104)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate3.2

[back to top]

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)

BRIEF-A is a standardized self-report measure that captures adults' views of their own self-regulation in their everyday environment. Metacognition Index T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater deficit in planning/organizational skills critical for college success. (NCT01342445)
Timeframe: after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 week

InterventionT score (Mean)
Placebo65.91
LDX 30-mg59.23
LDX 50-mg57.64
LDX 70-mg54.91

[back to top]

Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)

CAARS ADHD Index, adult self-report measure of ADHD symptoms. T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) for all subscales on the short version were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater ADHD symptomatology (and ultimately a worse outcome in this study). (NCT01342445)
Timeframe: after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 week

InterventionT score (Mean)
Placebo50.59
LDX 30-mg46.86
LDX 50-mg47.32
LDX 70-mg45.36

[back to top]

Brain Structure Volume

Brain structure volume measured in mm^3 (NCT01415440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Left Hippocampal VolumeLeft Amygdala VolumeRight Hippocampal VolumeRight Amygdala Volume
ADHD - Placebo3909.851431.314048.101573.57
ADHD - Vyvanse4069.721485.054206.411641.88

[back to top]

Change in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16 (Double-blind Phase, Dose Response Evaluable Set)

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. CHange in MADRS total score in Augmentsion Baseline to Week 16. (NCT01435759)
Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo-5.4
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg-6.7
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg-5.3
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg-6.1
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg-6.3

[back to top]

Change in Average Pulse Rate From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

(NCT01435759)
Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo-0.8
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg0.8
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg5.3
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg4.0
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg6.0

[back to top]

Change in Average Systolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

(NCT01435759)
Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo-0.2
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg0.2
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg0.5
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg3.5
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg2.6

[back to top]

Change in Average Diastolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

(NCT01435759)
Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo-0.1
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg-0.9
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg-0.1
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg2.8
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at up to 8 Weeks

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + Placebo-4.3
Antidepressant + SPD489-4.7

[back to top]

Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA)

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Antidepressant + Placebo15.1
Antidepressant + SPD48914.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 25% Response on the MADRS

The percentage of subjects who achieved a 25% response (i.e., ≥25% reduction in MADRS total score from Lead-in Baseline, Visit 2; Week 0). A comparison was performed at Visit 14/Early Termination (ET) (Week 16/ET). (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + Placebo65.0
Antidepressant + SPD48974.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS SR)

The QIDS-SR is a self-administered questionnaire designed to rate depressive symptoms. The scale contains 16 items, each scored using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (representing the most favorable response [low amount of symptom]) to 3 (representing the least favorable response [frequent/intense symptom]). The total score could range from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Higher scores represent more severe depressive symptoms. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + Placebo-2.6
Antidepressant + SPD489-2.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life Enjoyment Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)

The short form is a 16-item self-report questionnaire which evaluates general subject satisfaction with health, mood, relationships, functioning in daily life, and the treatment being taken. Overall level of satisfaction is evaluated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The total score ranges from 14-70 (last two items on the form are not included in the total score). A higher score indicates a better quality of life. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + Placebo7.2
Antidepressant + SPD4897.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at up to 8 Weeks

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + Placebo-6.3
Antidepressant + SPD489-6.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline Over Time in MADRS Total Score

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Visit 9 (Week 9)Visit 10 (Week 10)Visit 11 (Week 11)Visit 12 (Week 12)Visit 13 (Week 14)Visit 14 (Week 16)
Antidepressant + Placebo-2.2-3.8-6.0-6.2-7.4-6.3
Antidepressant + SPD489-3.4-4.2-5.4-5.6-7.3-6.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Short Form-12 Health Survey V2 (SF-12V2)

Total score ranges from 0 (lowest level of health) - 100 (highest level of health) on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability (i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability). Higher scores are associated with better quality of life. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PhysicalMental
Antidepressant + Placebo0.695.59
Antidepressant + SPD489-0.816.5

[back to top]

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
≥1 postive suicidal ideation≥1 suicidal attempt
Antidepressant + Placebo7.00.5
Antidepressant + SPD4897.00

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ImprovedNot ImprovedNot Assessed
Antidepressant + Placebo53.346.20.5
Antidepressant + SPD48955.344.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission on the MADRS

MADRS remission was defined as a MADRS total score of ≤10. A comparison was performed at Visit 14/ET (Week 16/ET). (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + Placebo22.5
Antidepressant + SPD48918.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Response on the MADRS

The percentage of subjects who achieved a 50% response (i.e., ≥50% reduction in MADRS total score from Lead-in Baseline, Visit 2; Week 0). A comparison was performed at Visit 14/ET (Week 16/ET). (NCT01436149)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + Placebo38.5
Antidepressant + SPD48941.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 25% Response on the MADRS

The percentage of subjects who achieved a 25% response (i.e. ≥25% reduction in MADRS total score from the Lead-in Baseline, Visit 2). (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + SPD48968.9
Antidepressant + Placebo74.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Response on the MADRS

The percentage of subjects who achieved a 50% response (i.e. ≥50% reduction in MADRS total score from the Lead-in Baseline, Visit 2). (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + SPD48941.6
Antidepressant + Placebo37.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Short Form-12 Health Survey V2 (SF-12V2)

Total score ranges from 0 (lowest level of health) - 100 (highest level of health) on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability (i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability). Higher scores are associated with better quality of life. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PhysicalMental
Antidepressant + Placebo0.905.16
Antidepressant + SPD4891.076.63

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline Over Time in MADRS Total Score

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 9 (Visit 9)Week 10 (Visit 10)Week 11 (Visit 11)Week 12 (Visit 12)Week 14 (Visit 13)Week 16 (Visit 14)
Antidepressant + Placebo-2.1-4.3-5.0-5.3-6.4-6.8
Antidepressant + SPD489-2.9-4.4-5.9-6.3-6.9-7.3

[back to top]

Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) - Total Aggregate Score

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD48917.0
Antidepressant + Placebo17.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at 8 Weeks

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489-7.3
Antidepressant + Placebo-6.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Global Fatigue Index (GFI)

MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489-6.6
Antidepressant + Placebo-4.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving Remission on the MADRS

MADRS remission was defined as a MADRS total score of ≤10. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Antidepressant + SPD48923.0
Antidepressant + Placebo17.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score Male

The CSFQ-14 is a short-form interview/questionnaire that measures illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning. A 5-point Likert scale is used ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The CSFQ-14 total score can range from 14 to 70, with lower scores being associated with worsened sexual functioning. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD4892.1
Antidepressant + Placebo1.0

[back to top]

Mean Change in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score Female

The CSFQ-14 is a short-form interview/questionnaire that measures illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning. A 5-point Likert scale is used ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The CSFQ-14 total score can range from 14 to 70, with lower scores being associated with worsened sexual functioning. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD4893.0
Antidepressant + Placebo1.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Abbreviated Brief Assessment of Cognition Affective Disorders (ABAC-A) Composite T-Scores

The ABAC-A is a rater-administered series of activities designed to be sensitive to the critical cognitive deficits in affective disorders and schizophrenia. There are 6 subtests of the ABAC-A: List Learning (verbal memory); Digit Sequencing Task (working memory); Token Motor Task (motor speed); Verbal Fluency; Symbol Coding (attention and processing speed); and Tower of London Test (executive functions). The ABAC-A Composite T-score change from Augmentation Baseline Visit (Visit 8; Week 8) at Visit 14/Early Termination (ET) (Week 16/ET) was analyzed. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventiont-score (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD4893.0
Antidepressant + Placebo2.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at 8 Weeks

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Antidepressant + SPD489-4.9
Antidepressant + Placebo-4.3

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ImprovedNot ImprovedNot Assessed
Antidepressant + Placebo53.546.50
Antidepressant + SPD48956.943.10

[back to top]

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT01436162)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
≥1 positive suicidal ideation≥1 suicidal attempt
Antidepressant + Placebo9.40.5
Antidepressant + SPD4899.00

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No pain or discomfortSlight pain or discomfortModerate pain or discomfortSevere pain or discomfortExtreme pain or discomfort
SPD489 + Antidepressant7155362086810

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No problems washing or dressing myselfSlight problems washing or dressing myselfModerate problems washing or dressing myselfSevere problems washing or dressing myselfUnable to wash or dress myself
SPD489 + Antidepressant13041744991

[back to top]

PRUQ-MDD - Number of Hours

The PRUQ-MDD assessed the long term economic outcomes. It collects utilization of healthcare resources reported by the study participants. Participants answered following questions - 1. How many hours do you usually work or would you usually be expected to work (hrs/week); 2. How many hours did you actually work last week; 3. On average, how many hours do you volunteer per week. Number of hours are reported. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionhours (Mean)
Work or usually expect to work (n=337)Actual work (n=337)Average volunteer per week (n=86)
SPD489 + Antidepressant34.031.28.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52

Baseline was defined as the Augmentation Baseline Visit of the antecedent study (SPD489-209 [NCT01435759], SPD489-322 [NCT01436149], and SPD489-323 [NCT01436162]). (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52/ET

Interventionmillimeter of mercury(mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline (n = 1559)Change at Week 52/ET (n = 1558)
SPD489 + Antidepressant117.62.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 52/ET

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a participant's life in 3 areas: work, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment. Baseline was defined as the Augmentation Baseline Visit of the antecedent study (SPD489-209 [NCT01435759], SPD489-322 [NCT01436149], and SPD489-323 [NCT01436162]). (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=1548)Change at Week 52/ET (n = 1530)
SPD489 + Antidepressant12.7-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - 14 Item Scale (CSFQ-14) Total Score at Week 52/ET

CSFQ-14 is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning. Baseline was defined as the Augmentation Baseline Visit of the antecedent study (SPD489-209 [NCT01435759], SPD489-322 [NCT01436149], and SPD489-323 [NCT01436162]). (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Male: Baseline (n=167)Male: Change at Week 52/ET (n=164)Female: Baseline (n=341)Female: Change at Week 52/ET (n=330)
SPD489 + Antidepressant46.61.737.22.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52

Baseline was defined as the Augmentation Baseline Visit of the antecedent study (SPD489-209 [NCT01435759], SPD489-322 [NCT01436149], and SPD489-323 [NCT01436162]). (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52/ET

Interventionbeats per minute(bpm) (Mean)
Baseline (n = 1559)Change at Week 52/ET (n = 1558)
SPD489 + Antidepressant72.75.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52

Baseline was defined as the Augmentation Baseline Visit of the antecedent study (SPD489-209 [NCT01435759], SPD489-322 [NCT01436149], and SPD489-323 [NCT01436162]). (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52/ET

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (n = 1559)Change at Week 52/ET (n = 1558)
SPD489 + Antidepressant75.41.2

[back to top]

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR)

QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression. The QIDS-SR was only assessed in the SPD489-322 antecedent study. The QIDS-SR total score is calculated as the sum of the highest score on any 1 of Items 1-4, Item 5, the highest score on any 1 of Items 6-9, Items 10-14, the highest score on either Item 15 or 16. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 + Antidepressant6.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I)

Participants who did not have Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) assessed at Week 8 in the antecedent study should not have had CGI-I assessed in this study and were excluded from the summary of CGI-I. CGI-I consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement includes a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SPD489 + Antidepressant1021

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analog Scale

EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale score is numbered from 0 to 100, where a score of 100 is the best health a participant can imagine (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 + Antidepressant75.7

[back to top]

Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 53

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SPD489 + Antidepressant14.3

[back to top]

PRUQ-MDD - Number of Days of Resource Utilization

The PRUQ-MDD assessed the long term economic outcomes. It collects utilization of healthcare resources reported by the study participants. Number of nights in medical/surgical ward, number of nights in ICU, and number of days a participant received home care in the past month are reported. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventiondays (Mean)
Number of nights in medical/surgical ward (n=4)Number of nights in ICU (n=4)Number of days received home care in past month
SPD489 + Antidepressant1.30.00.0

[back to top]

PRUQ-MDD - Effect of Depressive Symptoms

The PRUQ-MDD assessed the long term economic outcomes. It collects utilization of healthcare resources reported by the study participants. Participants answered following questions on a 0 to 10 point scale - 1. During past week, how much did depressive symptoms affect work productivity; 2. During past week, how much did depressive symptoms affect regular non-work daily activities. Higher scores indicates more effect of depressive symptoms on work productivity and non-work daily activities. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on scale (Mean)
Affected work productivity (n= 335)Affected regular non work daily activities (n=482)
SPD489 + Antidepressant2.12.5

[back to top]

Patient Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Major Depressive Disorder (PRUQ-MDD)

The PRUQ-MDD assessed the long term economic outcomes. It collects utilization of healthcare resources reported by the study participants. Participants answered the following questions: 1. Were you hospitalized in the past month, 2. Do you work for pay, 3. If you missed time at work last week, please note all the reasons why, 4. Would you say that the past week was typical, like the rest of the 3 weeks this month, in terms of your working hours, 5. Do you do volunteer work (VW), and 6. If you do not receive money for your work and do not participate in volunteer work, the reason is. Number of participants with response is reported. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hospitalized in Past MonthWork for PayReason Missing Work Time: Had a Day OffReason Missing Work Time: Physically IllReason Missing Work Time: Upset/Depressed/NervousReason Missing Work Time: OtherPast Week Was Typical: YesPast Week Was Typical: No, Worked More HoursPast Week Was Typical: No, Worked Less HoursVolunteer WorkReason no Money/VW: Physically IllReason no Money/VW: Upset/Depressed/NervousReason no Money/VW: Cannot Find WorkReason no Money/VW: OtherReason no Money/VW: Not Applicable
SPD489 + Antidepressant4337241015362494345866303948348

[back to top]

PRUQ-MDD - Number of Events (Visit to Health Care Provider/Visit to Hospital Facilities/Number of Times a Test Was Performed)

The PRUQ-MDD assessed the long term economic outcomes. It collects utilization of healthcare resources reported by the study participants. Participants answered following questions - 1. How many times did you visit the following healthcare providers in the past month: Family doctor/primary care, Non-physician healthcare practitioner (NPHP), Psychiatrist/Psychologist/Counselor (PPC); 2. How many times did you take one of the tests, mentioned below, during the past month: Blood test, CT Scan, X Ray, Renal function, Thyroid function; and 3. How many times did you visit the hospital emergency room (ER), urgent care facility (UCF) or an after-hours clinic (AHC) in the past month. Number of events (visit to health care provider, visit to hospital facilities, and number of times a test was performed) are reported. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionevents (Mean)
Visit to Family doctor/primary care (n=481)Visit to NPHP(n=480)Visit to PPC(n=481)Test performed: Blood Test (n=480)Test performed: CT Scan (n=480)Test performed: X Ray (n=480)Test performed: Renal function (n=480)Test performed: Thyroid function (n=480)Test performed: Other test (n=479)Visit to Hospital ER, UCF or AHC (n=482)
SPD489 + Antidepressant0.20.10.10.20.00.00.00.00.10.0

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No problems in walking aboutSlight problems in walking aboutModerate problems in walking aboutSevere problems in walking aboutUnable to walk about
SPD489 + Antidepressant119323782241

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No problems doing my usual activitiesSlight problems doing my usual activitiesModerate problems doing my usual activitiesSevere problems doing my usual activitiesUnable to do my usual activities
SPD489 + Antidepressant8004751975510

[back to top]

Quality of Life Enjoyment Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)

The Q-LES-Q-SF is a 16-item self-report questionnaire which evaluates general participant satisfaction with health, mood, relationships, functioning in daily life, and their treatment. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The total raw score (summary scale score) was calculated by summing item scores 1 to 14 (total raw score range: 14 to 70). Item 15 (satisfaction with medication, raw score range: 1 to 5) and Item 16 (overall satisfaction and contentment; raw score range: 1 to 5) were stand-alone items. For reporting, summary scale, Item 15 and Item 16 raw scores were transformed into percentage maximum possible score which ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Summary Scale (n = 506)Satisfaction with Medication (n = 478)Overall Satisfaction and Contentment (n = 506)
SPD489 + Antidepressant61.568.663.2

[back to top]

Short Form-12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12V2)

SF-12V2 is a multi-purpose, 7-item survey that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. It is expressed by two summary measures (Aggregate Physical and Aggregate Mental) for which values can range from 0 to 100. A higher score is indicative of a better health state. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggregate PhysicalAggregate Mental
SPD489 + Antidepressant49.142.7

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviour during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 5 up to Week 52/Early Termination(ET)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive Suicidal IdeationSuicidal Attempt
SPD489 + Antidepressant684

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses (NCT01436175)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Not anxious or depressedSlightly anxious or depressedModerately anxious or depressedSeverely anxious or depressedExtremely anxious or depressed
SPD489 + Antidepressant4616872897327

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 250 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)181.53

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 50 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)21.93

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 70 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)35.02

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 100 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)80.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 150 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)144.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 200 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)230.2

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 250 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)301.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 50 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)25.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 70 mg

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)43.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg

BAS scale has objective, subjective, and global impression components of akathisia (motor restlessness that manifests itself with an inability to sit still or remain motionless). Objective and subjective components are rated on a scale from 0 (normal/absence) to 3 (severe) and are summed yielding a total score of 0 to 9. Global impression is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe) with a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Lower scores indicate reduced restlessness. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.7
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.2
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg

CDSS is a 9-item scale to evaluate depression in subjects who have schizophrenia rated from 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with a total score range of 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 100 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.014
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)-0.047

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 150 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.037
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-0.039

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 200 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo-0.025
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-0.049

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 250 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo-0.034
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-0.048

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 50 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)-0.034

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Detection Task, 70 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.017
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-0.015

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 100 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo0.9
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)-15.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 150 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo21.1
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-11.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 200 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo-10.3
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 250 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo-5.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 50 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo-0.9
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)-8.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Groton Maze Learning Test, 70 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Placebo8.7
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-7.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 100 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.011
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)0.001

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 150 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.036
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-0.010

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 200 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.044
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-0.014

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 250 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.005
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-0.007

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 50 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.028
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)0.001

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: Identification Task, 70 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionLog10 milliseconds (Mean)
Placebo0.015
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)0.006

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 100 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo0.012
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)0.012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 150 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo0.026
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)0.042

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 200 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo-0.020
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)0.046

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 250 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo0.018
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)0.022

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 50 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo0.025
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)0.005

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery (CogState Battery) Score at Day 5: One Card Learning Task, 70 mg

This battery is a series of 4 computerized cognition tests (Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One Card Learning Task) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and reasoning, and problem solving. The entire battery takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. CogState scores are measured on a linear scale (no maximum score). The Groton Maze Learning Test measures total number of errors made in problem solving (lower score = better performance). The Detection Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). The Identification Task is measured by speed of performance (lower score = better performance). One Card Learning Task measures the accuracy of performance (higher score = better performance). (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

InterventionArcsine proportion correct (Mean)
Placebo0.015
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)0.021

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 100 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo2.14
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)4.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 150 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo2.67
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)2.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 200 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo2.76
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)3.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 250 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo3.67
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)3.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 50 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo2.86
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)5.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 70 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo2.38
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)2.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.6
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)-3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.1
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-4.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.3
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-4.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.3
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.6
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg

The PANSS is a validated measure that evaluates the presence, absence, and severity of 30 symptoms of schizophrenia including both positive and negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Each of the 30-items are rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) with a total scoring range of 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.1
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 100 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo0.19
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)5.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 150 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo-1.05
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)6.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 200 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo2.38
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)8.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 250 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo2.06
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)12.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 50 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo2.62
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)3.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 5: 70 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Placebo-0.95
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)5.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-7.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)-2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-4.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)-3.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo1.3
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)-2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-4.2
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)-3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg

The SANS was modified by eliminating the global and attention items; the score of the remaining non-global items is referred to as the SANS-18 total score. Each of the 18-items is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (severe) with a total scoring range of 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 100 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 150 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.3
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 200 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.0
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 250 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.2
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 50 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.4
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Day 5: 70 mg

SAS is a 10-item scale used to evaluate the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms. The items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with item-specific definitions given for each point. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Lower scores indicate less impairment. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.6
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 100 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo0.43
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)4.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 150 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-2.81
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)6.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 200 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-2.38
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)5.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 250 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-0.28
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(250 mg)7.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 50 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-0.14
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(50 mg)8.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 5: 70 mg

Blood pressure and pulse measurements were taken using an automated blood pressure monitoring device (ideally using the same device, the same arm and in the same position throughout the study). Measurements of vital signs were performed in triplicate (3 measurements) after the subject had been in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes. Each of the 3 triplicate readings were performed in succession, at least 1-2 minutes apart, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. It was expected that the triplicate measurements be obtained within a 5-6 minute period. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 5

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo1.43
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(70 mg)3.82

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 100 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(100 mg)50.6

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 150 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(150 mg)90.34

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Day 5: 200 mg

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01457339)
Timeframe: Day 5 (12-hour sampling period post-dose)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SPD489 (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate)(200 mg)133.3

[back to top]

Mean Maximum Maintained Dose of Lisdexamfetamine for at Least 1 Week of Trial.

The mean maximum daily dose of lisdexamfetamine that was maintained for at least 1 week of trial. (NCT01486810)
Timeframe: during 8 weeks of trial or length of participation

Interventionmgs/day (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine and Medication Management118.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Maintained on the Maximum Lisdexamfetamine Daily Dose.

Number of participants achieving and maintained for a seven day period during the trial on the maximum daily dose of 140 mg.. (NCT01486810)
Timeframe: during 1 week of study participation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lisdexamfetamine and Medication Management12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6

The Clinical Global Impressions Scale permits a global evaluation of the participant's severity of illness and improvement over time. The scale included a severity of illness item and a global improvement item. The investigator performed the CGI-I to rate the improvement of a participant's ADHD symptoms based on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; or 7=very much worse.). Percentage of participants with an improved measurement (response of very much improved and much improved) is reported. (NCT01552902)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo50
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate81.4
Methylphenidate71.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 6

(NCT01552902)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Placebo2.4
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate6.7
Methylphenidate8.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6

The ADHD-RS-IV was developed to measure the behaviors of children with ADHD and is commonly used in clinical studies of ADHD. The ADHD-RS-IV consisted of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54, Higher score = more severe symptoms. (NCT01552902)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-17
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate-25.4
Methylphenidate-22.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered as a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events between first dose of double-blind investigational product and up to 3 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. (NCT01552902)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 days after last dose (last dose at Week 6)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with serious TEAEs
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate1451
Methylphenidate1291
Placebo491

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6

(NCT01552902)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate1.53.4
Methylphenidate2.43.5
Placebo-1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 8

The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. Higher score indicates more severe symptoms. (NCT01552915)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-13.4
SPD489-25.6
OROS-MPH-23.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01552915)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo34.8
SPD48983.1
OROS-MPH81.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment

(NCT01552915)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 8 Weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-0.8
SPD4892.4
OROS-MPH0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment

(NCT01552915)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Placebo0.3
SPD4894.7
OROS-MPH6.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at up to 8 Weeks - Last on Treatment Assessment

(NCT01552915)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo-1.2
SPD4892.8
OROS-MPH2.2

[back to top]

Vitals (Systolic Blood Pressure)

systolic blood pressure (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionmm hg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate127.3
Sugar Pill121.6

[back to top]

Vitals (Diastolic Blood Pressure)

diastolic blood pressure (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionmm hg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate75.1
Sugar Pill77.7

[back to top]

Vitals

Heart rate (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate72.3
Sugar Pill76.9

[back to top]

Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a stimulus page. Subjects voice the number associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible. The examiner records the total amount of responses completed. The task continues for 90 seconds with the research staff recording responses. The SDMT score ranges from 0 to 110, with higher values representing a better outcome in cognitive processing speed. (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate36.9
Sugar Pill46.8

[back to top]

Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised

The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised (BVMTR) presents six abstract designs for 10 seconds. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. There are three learning trials in which patients attempt to replicate the stimuli previously presented. Patients are given a score for all three trials based on correct location and accuracy of the replicated stimuli. Each trial can be awarded up to 12 points, the sum of total points awarded across all three trials is the total learning score. The BVMT-R total learning score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher values representing a better outcome in visuospatial learning/memory. (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate15.2
Sugar Pill18.7

[back to top]

Paced Auditory Serial Audition Test (PASAT)

The PASAT is a test requiring attention and vigilance. In this test, the patient listens to a tape recording of digits presented one at a time. The task for the patient is to add each number to the one immediately preceding it. For example, the recording might present the numbers 1, 7, 5, 4. The patient adds the first two numbers (1 + 7) and responds with the number 8. The patient then adds the second two numbers (7 + 5) and responds with the number 12. The patient then adds the third two numbers (5 + 4) and responds with the number 9. This continues for a total of 61 numbers presented in a random order. The patients score is the total number correct out of 60 (Stebbins et al. 2007). The PASAT score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher values representing a better outcome in cognitive processing speed. (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate32.0
Sugar Pill37.4

[back to top]

California Verbal Learning Test - 2nd Edition

The California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT2) begins with the examiner reading a list of 16 words. Patients listen to the list and report as many of the items as possible. After recall is recorded, the entire list is read again. Altogether, there are five learning trials, the total correct of all trials is summed together creating a total verbal learning score. The CVLT-II total verbal learning score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher values representing a better outcome in verbal learning/memory. (NCT01615887)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Sulfate44.9
Sugar Pill49.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

"Suicidality was assessed by using the C-SSRS, a semi-structured interview designed to capture the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The interview and rating for the C-SSRS was completed by a clinician who had been successfully trained by the sponsor or designee. The interview was initiated with 5 (yes/no) questions, presented in ascending order of severity, about suicidal ideation. The most severe type of ideation was rated for frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reason. If the answers to the first 2 ideation questions were yes, the clinician asked questions 3-5. Active suicidal ideation included any participant who answered yes to questions 2-5. If the answers to ideation questions 1 and 2 were no, then the clinician proceeded to 5 (yes/no) questions that addressed suicidal behavior, which was categorized as actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts or behaviors, and completed suicide." (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: 53 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal behaviorActive suicidal ideationNon-suicidal self-injurious behavior
All Participants023

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)

The EDE-Q is a 28-item questionnaire measuring eating pathology and is derived directly from the Eating Disorder Examination Interview. The EDE-Q focuses on the past 28 days to assess the main behavioral (eating and purging) and attitudinal features of eating disorders. The 28 items are rated by the participant on a 7-point scale (ranging from 0 to 6), with higher scores indicating increased pathology. The EDE-Q includes 4 subscales: Restraint, Eating Concern, Weight Concern, and Shape Concern. The global score is the average of all 28 items, with a range of 0 to 6. A negative value indicates a favorable result. The values presented are the mean change from baseline. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, and 52, and end of treatment (either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 4 (Week 4), n=483Visit 9 (Week 24), n=391Visit 16 (Week 52), n=314End of Treatment, n=503
All Participants-1.66-1.95-1.95-1.90

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

The CGI rating scales permitted the global evaluation of a participant's condition severity and improvement over time. The CGI-I was performed to rate the improvement of a participant's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) and included a 'not assessed' option. The responses were dichotomized into 2 categories (improved or not improved). Improved included very much improved and much improved; not improved included minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Not assessed and missing values were excluded from the percentage calculation. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 4, 24, and 52, and end of treatment (either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Visit 1 (Week 1), n=589Visit 4 (Week 4), n=572Visit 9 (Week 24), n=466Visit 16 (Week 52), n=369End of Treatment, n=597
All Participants53.788.592.795.489.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities

The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. The percentages of participants with various responses to the usual activities questionnaire are reported. Percentages are based on all participants in the Full Analysis Set with a valid result at the given visit. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (ET; either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants at ET (Number)
I have no problems doing my usual activitiesI have slight problems doing my usual activitiesModerate problems doing my usual activitiesI have severe problems doing my usual activitiesI am unable to do my usual activities
All Participants88.58.32.20.90.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety

(NCT01657019)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any TEAESerious TEAEs
All Participants84.52.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care

The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. The percentages of participants with various responses to the self care questionnaire are reported. Percentages are based on all participants in the Full Analysis Set with a valid result at the given visit. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (ET; either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants at ET (Number)
I have no problems washing or dressing myselfI have slight problems washing or dressing myselfModerate problems washing or dressing myselfI have severe problems washing or dressing myselfI am unable to wash or dress myself
All Participants97.11.80.70.20.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort

The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. The percentages of participants with various responses to the pain/discomfort questionnaire are reported. Percentages are based on all participants in the Full Analysis Set with a valid result at the given visit. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (ET; either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants at ET (Number)
I have no pain or discomfortI have slight pain or discomfortI have moderate pain or discomfortI have severe pain or discomfortI have extreme pain or discomfort
All Participants71.220.97.00.90

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Mobility

The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. The percentages of participants with various responses to the mobility questionnaire are reported. Percentages are based on all participants in the Full Analysis Set with a valid result at the given visit. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (ET; either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants at ET (Number)
I have no problems in walking aboutI have slight problems in walking aboutI have moderate problems in walking aboutI have severe problems in walking aboutI am unable to walk about
All Participants91.26.81.40.40.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety or Depression

The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. The percentages of participants with various responses to the anxiety/depression questionnaire are reported. Percentages are based on all participants in the Full Analysis Set with a valid result at the given visit. (NCT01657019)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (ET; either Visit 16 [Week 52] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants at ET (Number)
I am not anxious or depressedI am slightly anxious or depressedI am moderately anxious or depressedI am severely anxious or depressedI am extremely anxious or depressed
All Participants75.918.74.50.90

[back to top]

Revised Modified Overt Aggression Scale - Total Score

A parent rated retrospective dimensional assessment of oppositional and aggressive behaviors, with scores ranging from 0-40, and higher scores indicating greater severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine26.0317.93

[back to top]

Pulse

Heart rate in beats per minute. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionbeats per minute. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine80.8488.1584.3390.7188.45

[back to top]

Pulse

Heart rate in beats per minute. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionbeats per minute. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine82.2895.0888.2596.3293.0894.1687.3391.9487.1795.8392.75
Placebo84.6485.2181.6485.7983.2183.0090.5590.0085.1082.9090.62

[back to top]

Height

A dimensional measure assessed in cms. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventioncm. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine142.37142.35142.43142.59142.59

[back to top]

Height

A dimensional measure assessed in cms. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventioncm. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine140.25140.05139.95140.26140.56140.11140.21140.55140.81140.83140.98
Placebo144.63144.76144.81144.88144.54144.82145.44145.14144.98145.30145.60

[back to top]

Conners Teacher Global Index

Teacher completed dimensional measure of ADHD symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 - 30, and higher scores indicating more severe impairment. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 3.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3
Open Lisdexamfetamine18.1313.2110.188.31

[back to top]

Conners Global Index Restless-Impulsive Subscale Parent Report

A dimensional parent report measure of restless-impulsive symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 21, and higher scores indicating greater impairment. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 3.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3
Open Lisdexamfetamine15.919.5510.608.60

[back to top]

Conners Global Index Emotional Lability Subscale - Parent Report

A sub scale of the Conners Global Index, with scores ranging from 0 - 12, with higher scores indicating more impairment. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 3.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3
Open Lisdexamfetamine8.815.906.335.45

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression-Severity-Severe Mood Dysregulation

A dimensional clinician rating of overall SMD related impairment, modified by the National Institute of Mental Health to assess specific domains pertinent to Severe Mood Dysregulation. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 7. Higher scores means greater impairment. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine4.914.424.153.673.613.423.453.51
Placebo3.624.573.513.903.593.373.113.30

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression-Severity-Severe Mood Dysregulation

A dimensional clinician rating of overall SMD related impairment, modified by the National Institute of Mental Health to assess specific domains pertinent to Severe Mood Dysregulation. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 7. Higher scores means greater impairment. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine4.304.31

[back to top]

Affective Reactivity Index - Parent Report

A parent completed dimensional measure of emotional reactivity, with scores ranging from 0-12, and higher scores indicating greater severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine10.007.586.586.426.696.496.746.39
Placebo8.577.716.215.326.495.624.895.30

[back to top]

Affective Reactivity Index - Parent Report

A parent completed dimensional measure of emotional reactivity, with scores ranging from 0-12, and higher scores indicating greater severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine9.296.87

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic Blood pressure measured in mmHG. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionmm Hg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine67.3969.1566.6367.2169.31

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression - Improvement

Percentage improved by treatment group (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Percentage improved at week 4 for Open Lisdexamfetamine group and at week 12 for fluoxetine and placebo groups.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fluoxetine7
Placebo7
Open Lisdexamfetamine8

[back to top]

ADHD-IV Rating Scale

A dimensional rating of ADHD symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 - 54, and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine34.2016.59

[back to top]

ADHD-IV Rating Scale

A dimensional rating of ADHD symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 - 54, and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12
Fluoxetine34.5014.9216.29
Placebo34.3118.6411.93

[back to top]

Conners Parent Global Index

Parent completed dimensional measure of ADHD symptoms, with score range from 0 - 30 and higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 3.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3
Open Lisdexamfetamine15.919.5410.608.60

[back to top]

Revised Modified Overt Aggression Scale - Total Score

A parent rated retrospective dimensional assessment of oppositional and aggressive behaviors, with scores ranging from 0-40, and higher scores indicating greater severity. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine22.2314.4413.7210.0013.1914.0912.6114.29
Placebo33.6825.3520.6020.5521.8921.3317.6818.34

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic Blood pressure measured in mmHG. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionmm Hg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine68.8671.3366.0068.7471.1771.1769.5868.1468.0670.8177.11
Placebo66.4069.5066.7962.8266.2165.1770.6170.6468.4067.0670.05

[back to top]

Weight

Weight in kg. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionkg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine42.5941.8341.2940.7340.67

[back to top]

Weight

Weight in kg. (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionkg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine37.9637.2936.9636.5536.2036.0835.7335.3035.0834.6134.73
Placebo47.2646.3945.5645.0645.2244.8044.3444.7244.0844.1643.05

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic Blood Pressure measured in mmHG (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

Interventionmm Hg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Open Lisdexamfetamine107.40106.03107.48110.73111.77

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic Blood Pressure measured in mmHG (NCT01714310)
Timeframe: Baseline through week 12.

,
Interventionmm Hg. (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 10Week 12
Fluoxetine107.8599.42104.83109.20112.00109.57111.58112.04111.20112.25116.15
Placebo106.68111.71110.36109.89110.07104.20108.98112.80110.94105.67113.90

[back to top]

Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PLACEBO7.3
SPD4895.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 12

The BES is a self-reported questionnaire containing 16 items designed to assess behavioral, affective, and attitudinal components of the subjective experience of binge eating. Each item is assessed based on 1 of 4 responses, with 1 denoting that a participant has greater control over eating behavior and 4 denoting that a participant had less control over eating behavior. A total score (sum of the 16 items) may range from 16-64. A lower score indicates greater control over eating behavior. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-8.55
SPD489-18.87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Fasting Total Cholesterol Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12/ET

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-0.094
SPD489-0.305

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12/Early termination (ET)

Interventionmillimole per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO0.122
SPD489-0.077

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frontal Systems Behavior (FrSBe) Total Score at Week 12

"The FrSBe is a 46-item self-rating scale designed to measure the neurobehavioral traits associated with the 3 primary regions of the prefrontal cortex. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency with which they have engaged in certain behaviors using a rating scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Summary scores were calculated and converted to t-score. A decrease from baseline in FrSBe total score represents improvement." (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventiont-scores (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-3.09
SPD489-3.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12/ET

InterventionPercent hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO0.01
SPD489-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)

(NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)

InterventionBinge episodes per week (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-3.49
SPD489-5.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 12

The Y-BOCS-BE measures the obsession of binge-eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge-eating behaviors. The scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). Total scores range from 0 to 40. Reduction in total score indicates improvement. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-8.28
SPD489-15.68

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12

(NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO0.11
SPD489-6.25

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

CGI-I consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PLACEBO47.3
SPD48982.1

[back to top]

Binge Eating Response

Response is based on the reduction in the number of binge eating episodes. Percentage of participants with response was reported. Responses were categorized as follows: 1-week Cessation = 100% reduction in binge episodes during the preceding 7 days. Marked Reduction = 99% to 75% reduction during the time since the previous visit. Moderate Reduction = 74% to 50% reduction during the time since the previous visit. Negative to Minimal Reduction = <50% reduction during the time since the previous visit. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Week 12/ET

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1-week cessationMarked ReductionModerate ReductionNegative to Minimal Reduction
PLACEBO26.615.217.940.2
SPD48947.131.611.89.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Scores at Week 12

The Eating Inventory also known as the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire is a 51-item self-reported questionnaire intended to assess 3 dimensions of eating behavior. There are 36 true/false items, 14 items on a 4-point Likert scale (1=eat rarely to 4=always), and 1 item on a 6-point Likert scale (1=eat whatever you want to 6=constantly limiting food intake). Cognitive Restraint score ranges from 0-21. Hunger score ranges from 0-14. Disinhibition score ranges from 0-16. Higher scores denote higher levels of restrained eating, disinhibited eating and predisposition to hunger. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cognitive Restraint of EatingDisinhibition of EatingPerceived Hunger
PLACEBO1.63-2.12-1.90
SPD4893.27-6.31-6.60

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. Number of participants with suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal IdeationSuicidal behavior
PLACEBO30
SPD48920

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Percentage of participants with various anxiety/depression conditions were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Not anxious or depressedSlightly anxious or depressedModerately anxious or depressedSeverely anxious or depressedExtremely anxious or depressed
PLACEBO70.219.77.92.20
SPD48972.216.69.11.60.5

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Percentage of participants with various mobility conditions were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems walking aboutSlight problems walking aboutModerate problems walking aboutSevere problems walking aboutUnable to walk about
PLACEBO82.614.02.80.60
SPD48987.210.72.100

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Percentage of participants with various pain/discomfort conditions were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No pain or discomfortSlight pain or discomfortModerate pain or discomfortSevere pain or discomfortExtreme pain or discomfort
PLACEBO64.627.57.30.60
SPD48971.120.97.50.50

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Percentage of participants with various self-care conditions were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems washing or dressingSlight problems washing or dressingModerate problems washing or dressingSevere problems washing or dressingUnable to wash or dress
PLACEBO89.36.73.900
SPD48995.73.21.100

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Percentage of participants with various usual activities conditions were reported. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems doing usual activitiesSlight problems doing usual activitiesModerate problems doing usual activitiesSevere problems doing usual activitiesUnable to do usual activities
PLACEBO78.014.76.21.10
SPD48987.19.73.200

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a 4-Week Cessation From Binge Eating

4-week cessation from binge eating is defined as no binge eating episodes for 28 consecutive days prior to the last study visit. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PLACEBO14.1
SPD48940.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Days Per Week at Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)

Binge days defined as days during which at least 1 binge episode occurred. As assessed by clinical interview based on participant binge diary. (NCT01718483)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 8 (Weeks 11-12)

InterventionBinge days per week (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-2.51
SPD489-3.87

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Usual Activities

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems doing usual activitiesSlight problems dosin usual activitiesModerate problems doing usual activitiesSevere problems doing usual activitiesUnable to do usual activities
PLACEBO82.114.33.00.60
SPD48989.98.31.20.60

[back to top]

Change in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity. Calculated as Baseline (Day 0) - Week 12 ACSA scores. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PLACEBO7.0
SPD4894.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With a 4-Week Cessation From Binge Eating

4-week cessation from binge eating is defined as no binge eating episodes for 28 consecutive days prior to the last study visit. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PLACEBO13.1
SPD48936.2

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Self-Care

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems washing or dressingSlight problems washing or dressingModerate problems washing or dressingSevere problems washing or dressingUnable to wash or dress
PLACEBO97.02.40.600
SPD48997.03.0000

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PLACEBO42.9
SPD48986.2

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Mobility

Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No problems in walking aboutSlight problems in walking aboutModerate problems walking aboutSevere problems walking aboutUnable to walk about
PLACEBO86.98.93.01.20
SPD48991.77.10.60.60

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Anxiety/Depression

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Not anxious or depressedSlightly anxious or depressedModerately anxious or depressedSeverely anxious or depressedExtremely anxious or depressed
PLACEBO69.623.24.81.21.2
SPD48976.320.72.400.6

[back to top]

EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report (EQ-5D-5L): Pain/Discomfort

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No pain or discomfortSlight pain or discomfortModerate pain or discomfortSevere pain or discomfortExtreme pain or discomfort
PLACEBO75.618.53.03.00
SPD48976.320.13.000.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eating Inventory Scores at Week 12

There are 36 true/false items, 14 items on a 4-point Likert scale (1=eat rarely to 4=always), and 1 item on a 6-point Likert scale (1=eat whatever you want to 6=constantly limiting food intake). Cognitive Restraint score ranges from 0-21. Hunger score ranges from 0-14. Disinhibition score ranges from 0-16. Higher scores denote higher levels of restrained eating, disinhibited eating and predisposition to hunger. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cognitive Restraint of EatingDisinhibition of EatingPerceived Hunger
PLACEBO2.44-2.01-1.93
SPD4893.71-5.61-6.14

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The assessment is done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal ideationSuicidal behavior
PLACEBO00
SPD48900

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight (kg) at Week 12

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-0.15
SPD489-5.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 12

The Y-BOCS-BE measures the obsession of binge-eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge-eating behaviors. The scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). Total scores range from 0 to 40. Reduction in total score indicates improvement. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-7.42
SPD489-15.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12

InterventionBinge episodes per week (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-3.31
SPD489-5.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Days Per Week at Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12

Binge days defined as days during which at least 1 binge episode occurred. As assessed by clinical interview based on subject binge diary. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 8 Which Spans Weeks 11/12

InterventionBinge days per week (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-2.26
SPD489-3.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-0.02
SPD4890.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frontal Systems Behavior (FrSBe) Total Score at Up to 12 Weeks

"The FrSBe is a 46-item self-rating scale designed to measure the neurobehavioral traits associated with the 3 primary regions of the prefrontal cortex. Subjects were asked to indicate the frequency with which they have engaged in certain behaviors using a rating scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Summary scores were calculated and converted to t-score. A decrease from baseline in FrSBe total score represents improvement." (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 12 weeks

Interventiont-scores (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-3.09
SPD489-4.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 12 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO0.062
SPD489-0.133

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Fasting Total Cholesterol Levels at Up to 12 Weeks

(NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 12 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-0.126
SPD489-0.204

[back to top]

Binge Eating Response

Response is based on the reduction in the number of binge eating episodes. Responses were categorized as follows: -1-week Cessation = 100% reduction in binge episodes during the preceding 7 days -Marked Reduction = 99% to 75% reduction during the time since the previous visit -Moderate Reduction = 74% to 50% reduction during the time since the previous visit -Negative to Minimal Reduction = <50% reduction during the time since the previous visit (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1-week cessationMarked reductionModerate reductionNegative to minimal reduction
PLACEBO23.913.419.743.0
SPD48955.922.816.64.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Binge Eating Scale (BES) Score at Week 12

The BES is a self-reported questionnaire containing 16 items designed to assess behavioral, affective, and attitudinal components of the subjective experience of binge eating. Each item is assessed based on 1 of 4 responses, with 1 denoting that a subject has greater control over eating behavior and 4 denoting that a subject had less control over eating behavior. A total score (sum of the 16 items) may range from 16-64. A lower score indicates greater control over eating behavior. (NCT01718509)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PLACEBO-8.24
SPD489-17.52

[back to top]

Child Behavioral Functioning

Child symptom severity will be assessed using the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-s) scale. This was collected at Baseline, Week 8 (end of Phase 1) and Week 16 (end of Phase 2). The CGI-S scale summarizes the clinician's impression of the participant's symptom improvement and ranges from 1-7 with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse. (NCT01816074)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16
BPT Then Maternal Medication4.673.783.22
Maternal Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) Then Additional BPT4.563.753.67
Maternal Medication Then Additional Maternal Medication4.784.334.13
Maternal Medication Then BPT4.443.633.38

[back to top]

Maternal Behavioral Functioning

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scale will be used. This was collected at Baseline, Week 8 (end of Phase 1) and Week 16 (end of Phase 2). The CGI-S scale summarizes the clinician's impression of the participant's symptom improvement and ranges from 1-7 with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse. (NCT01816074)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16
BPT Then Maternal Medication4.453.802.56
Maternal Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) Then Additional BPT4.503.673.86
Maternal Medication Then Additional Maternal Medication4.643.553.20
Maternal Medication Then BPT4.822.602.60

[back to top]

Parental and Family Functioning

The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) will be used at baseline, week 8, and week 16 to provide an observational measure of positive and negative behaviors of the mother toward the child. Instances of positive (e.g. praise) and negative (e.g. criticism) behaviors are coded by study raters trained to reliability; scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher numbers indicate higher instances of the observed behaviors. (NCT01816074)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventioninstances observed (Mean)
Total Positive ParentingTotal Negative Parenting
Behavior Parent Training Then Additional BPT - Baseline17.4910.64
Behavior Parent Training Then Additional BPT - Week 1639.528.85
Behavior Parent Training Then Additional BPT - Week 834.719.44
Behavior Parent Training Then Maternal Medication - Baseline21.838.04
Behavior Parent Training Then Maternal Medication - Week 1644.077.66
Behavior Parent Training Then Maternal Medication - Week 846.335.01
Maternal Medication Then Additional Maternal Med - Baseline23.6111.33
Maternal Medication Then Additional Maternal Med - Week 1632.5610.51
Maternal Medication Then Additional Maternal Med - Week 827.1717.01
Maternal Medication Then Behavior Parent Training - Baseline41.678.64
Maternal Medication Then Behavior Parent Training - Week 1651.705.96
Maternal Medication Then Behavior Parent Training - Week 831.5513.47

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01890785)
Timeframe: Up to 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Orange Juice24.5
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Vanilla Yogurt32.2
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Intact Capsule Fasting38.5

[back to top]

AUC for D-amphetamine

d-Amphetamine is a metabolite of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT01890785)
Timeframe: Up to 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Orange Juice1140.9
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Vanilla Yogurt1110.1
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Intact Capsule Fasting1180.2

[back to top]

Cmax for D-amphetamine

d-Amphetamine is a metabolite of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and is an active form that is responsible for the drug's therapeutic activity. (NCT01890785)
Timeframe: Up to 96 hours-post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Orange Juice59.1
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Vanilla Yogurt59.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Intact Capsule Fasting61.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01890785)
Timeframe: Up to 96 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Orange Juice27.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Mixed in Vanilla Yogurt36.0
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Intact Capsule Fasting38.3

[back to top]

WRAADS

"The Wender-Reimherr adult attention deficit disorder scale (WRAADS): Symptom measure for emotional functioning/lability, generally reported as Sum of Responses (0-2 per item, higher = more impaired).~For this outcome measure, Average scores for particular questions were taken - specifically question 3, question 4, and question 5." (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Question 3Question 4Question 5
Off Drug Then on Drug0.941.471.82
On Drug Then Off Drug0.801.271.13

[back to top]

The Go/No-Go Task Percentage Assessed by fMRI

"Performance Measures on the Go/No-Go Task assessed by fMRI as a Function of Trial Type, Face Emotion, and Drug Condition in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The Go/No-Go Task is a neuropsychological test that provides a direct measure of number of responses made that are correct or incorrect. It is not a scale. Reported are the percentage of correct responses on that direct performance measure. 0% correct is worse than 100% correct." (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage correct responses/inhibitions (Mean)
Happy Correct ResponsesHappy Correct InhibitionsSad Correct ResponsesSad Correct InhibitionsNeutral Correct ResponsesNeutral Correct Inhibitions
Lisdexamfetamine97.087.988.586.795.679.6
Placebo91.788.790.384.493.277.5

[back to top]

fMRI Reaction Time

Reaction-time, as measured by the reaction time test Go/No-Go Task as a Function of Trial Type, Face Emotion, and Drug Condition in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
Interventionms (Mean)
HappySadNeutral
Lisdexamfetamine519509533
Placebo532533553

[back to top]

ADHD-RS-IV Combined Sum

ADHD symptoms and severity. Norm referenced interview to assess severity and frequency of ADHD symptoms. 18 Items are scored 0-3 to reflect severity and frequency of ADHD symptoms, and a sum is taken. Full range from 0 to 54, with higher number indicating more symptoms and severity. (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
On DrugPlacebo
Off Drug Then on Drug13.6731.00
On Drug Then Off Drug11.0025.65

[back to top]

ADHD-Inattentive

ADHD symptoms and severity - subscale for Inattentiveness. 9-item scale, each scored 0-3, with total from 0 to 27. Higher score indicates higher level of inattentiveness. (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
On drugPlacebo
Off Drug Then on Drug8.8319.2
On Drug Then Off Drug7.3618.94

[back to top]

CGI-S

"CGI-S: Severity of impairment due to ADHD was measured by the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S). Lower scores indicate less severe impairment from symptoms, with a CGI-I=1 indicating the person is normal with no impairment. (1= normal, not ill, 2= minimally ill, 3= mildly ill, 4= moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7= very severely ill)" (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
On Drug Then Off Drug4.9
Off Drug Then on Drug4.95

[back to top]

CGI-I

Clinical Global Impressions - CGI-I: Clinical response was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I). Lower CGI-I scores indicate greater improvement (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse). (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
On Drug Then Off Drug1.88
Off Drug Then on Drug2.00

[back to top]

BRIEF-A

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function®-Adult Version (BRIEF-A): Norm Referenced Measure of Impaired Executive Functioning, reported in T-Scores (0 to 100, with 50 +/-1 SD = 'Normal', higher is worse, more impaired) (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventiont-score (Mean)
On Drug Then Off Drug66.64
Off Drug Then on Drug73.5

[back to top]

ASRS - Expanded

ADHD and Related Symptoms Measure (ASRS): self report, reported as Sum of Responses (0-4 per item, higher = more impaired) 0-26 (normal range) and >27 (clinically significant symptoms). (NCT01924429)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
On Drug Then Off Drug83.7
Off Drug Then on Drug86

[back to top]

Percent Change in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Signal

Blood-oxygen-level dependent contrast imaging, or BOLD-contrast imaging, is a method used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to observe different areas of the brain or other organs, which are found to be active at any given time. BOLD signals were compared from baseline, first intervention and second intervention. (NCT01977625)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine0.41
Placebo-0.11

[back to top]

Change in BADDS Total Score

The total BADDS ranged from 0-120 with higher scores meaning greater problems with memory, attention and focus. Difference in BADDS score from Baseline to End of Treatment for each study Arm was calculated. (NCT01977625)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionchange in units (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine-23.36
Placebo-8.57

[back to top]

Time to Relapse From Date of Randomization to Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

Relapse status was assessed during the double-blind treatment phase and was defined as having 2 or more binge days per week for 2 consecutive weeks (14 consecutive days) prior to any visit and having an increase in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score of 2 or more points compared to the randomized-withdrawal baseline (date of relapse - date of randomization). Binge eating information was captured via a self-report paper diary. The binge diary captured the number of binges per day, total hours per day spent binging, type of binge (at mealtime or at another time other than mealtime), and a description of the binge (amounts and types of foods). Binge frequency was reviewed by the clinician with the subject to confirm reported binge episodes per day. The CGI-S was performed to rate the severity of a subject's condition using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill). (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)NA
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)NA

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems washing or dressing myselfI have slight problems washing or dressing myselfModerate problems washing or dressing myselfI have severe problems washing or dressing myselfI am unable to wash or dress myself
Open-label Safety Population98.70.80.30.30

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no pain or discomfortI have slight pain or discomfortModerate pain or discomfortI have severe pain or discomfortI have extreme pain or discomfort
Open-label Safety Population72.320.95.31.30.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Mobility at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems in walking aboutI have slight problems in walking aboutModerate problems in walking aboutI have severe problems in walking aboutI am unable to walk about
Open-label Safety Population87.99.81.50.80

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety And Depression at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I am not anxious or depressedI am slightly anxious or depressedModerately anxious or depressedI am severely anxious or depressedI am extremely anxious or depressed
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)66.426.74.32.60.0
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)79.515.73.10.80.8

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Anxiety And Depression at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I am not anxious or depressedI am slightly anxious or depressedModerately anxious or depressedI am severely anxious or depressedI am extremely anxious or depressed
Open-label Safety Population80.915.62.31.00.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The CGI-S permits a global evaluation of a subject's condition and severity of symptoms. The CGI-S was performed to rate the severity of a subject's condition based on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill). (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal, Not at All IllBorderline Mentally IllMildly IllModerately IllMarkedly IllSeverely IllAmong the Most Extremely Ill
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)45.010.714.522.16.90.00.8
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)81.611.82.22.22.20.00.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

"The C-SSRS is a semistructured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The interview was initiated with 5 (yes/no) questions, presented in ascending order of severity, about suicidal ideation. The most severe type of ideation was rated for frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reason. If the answer to the first 2 ideation questions was yes, the clinician asked questions 3-5. Active suicidal ideation included any participant who answered yes to questions 2-5. If the answers to ideation questions 1 and 2 were No, then the clinician proceeded to 5 (yes/no) questions that addressed suicidal behavior, which was categorized as actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts or behaviors, and completed suicide." (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal BehaviorActive Suicidal IdeationNon-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)000
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

"The C-SSRS is a semistructured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred. The interview was initiated with 5 (yes/no) questions, presented in ascending order of severity, about suicidal ideation. The most severe type of ideation was rated for frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reason. If the answer to the first 2 ideation questions was yes, the clinician asked questions 3-5. Active suicidal ideation included any participant who answered yes to questions 2-5. If the answers to ideation questions 1 and 2 were No, then the clinician proceeded to 5 (yes/no) questions that addressed suicidal behavior, which was categorized as actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts or behaviors, and completed suicide." (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12])

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Suicidal BehaviorActive Suicidal IdeationNon-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior
Open-label Safety Population002

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5--Dimension 5--Level Self--Report Questionnaire (EQ--5D--5L) For Mobility at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems in walking aboutI have slight problems in walking aboutModerate problems in walking aboutI have severe problems in walking aboutI am unable to walk about
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)83.614.71.70.00.0
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)91.36.31.60.80.0

[back to top]

Change From Randomized-Withdrawal Baseline in The Total Score of The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) During The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The Y-BOCS-BE measures the obsession of binge eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge eating behaviors. The scale is a clinician rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The scale includes questions regarding the amount of time spent on obsessions, impairment or distress experienced, and resistance and control over these thoughts. The same types of questions were asked about compulsions (ie, time spent, interference, etc.).Total scores range from 0 to 40. A total score of 0-7 is sub-clinical, 8-15 is mild, 16-23 is moderate, 24-31 is severe, and 32-40 is extreme. A decrease from baseline in Y-BOCS-BE Total Score represents an improvement in obsession with binge-eating thoughts or compulsiveness of binge-eating behaviors. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Randomized-withdrawal baseline (Visit 8; 12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12]), Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38])

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)5.5
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)-0.0

[back to top]

Change From Randomized-Withdrawal Baseline in The Number of Binge- Eating Days Per Week During The Randomized-withdrawal Period

A binge day was defined as days during which at least 1 binge episode occurred. As assessed by clinical interview based on subject binge diary. Binge eating information was captured via a self-report paper diary. The binge diary captured the number of binges per day, total hours per day spent binging, type of binge (at mealtime or at another time other than mealtime), and a description of the binge (amounts and types of foods). Binge frequency was reviewed by the clinician with the subject to confirm reported binge episodes per day. A negative change from Baseline indicates that binge-related behavior decreased. The randomized -withdrawal-baseline was defined as the weekly average number of binge days for the 14 days prior to the Randomization Visit (Visit 8). (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Randomized--withdrawal baseline (Visit 8; 12 weeks after start of open- label treatment [Week 12]), Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38])

Interventiondays (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)0.63
SPD489 (Randomized--Withdrawal Period)0.02

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Pain and Discomfort at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no pain or discomfortI have slight pain or discomfortModerate pain or discomfortI have severe pain or discomfortI have extreme pain or discomfort
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)75.016.48.60.00.0
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)71.718.18.70.01.6

[back to top]

Total Scores For The Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Scale During Follow-up

The ACSA was used in this study to assess potential withdrawal symptoms associated with chronic use of SPD489. The ACSA is a self-completed scale used to assess withdrawal symptoms. The scale has 16 symptom items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The ACSA total score ranges from 0-64, where a higher score indicates greater withdrawal symptom severity. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination) and Visit 22 (7 days post last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 21, n=88, 94Visit 22, n=75, 78
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)7.64.6
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)4.95.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems doing my usual activitiesI have slight problems doing my usual activitiesModerate problems doing my usual activitiesI have severe problems doing my usual activitiesI am unable to do my usual activities
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)79.316.42.60.01.7
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)86.611.00.81.60.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Usual Activities at Endpoint of The Open-label Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 8 (12 weeks after start of open-label treatment [Week 12] or Early Termination)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems doing my usual activitiesI have slight problems doing my usual activitiesModerate problems doing my usual activitiesI have severe problems doing my usual activitiesI am unable to do my usual activities
Open-label Safety Population88.98.12.30.80

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Within Each Category of The EuroQuol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self Care at Endpoint of The Randomized-withdrawal Period

The EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as current overall health. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is represented by a single item with 5 levels of responses, from poor health to good health. (NCT02009163)
Timeframe: Visit 21 (26 weeks after randomization [Week 38] or Early Termination)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
I have no problems washing or dressing myselfI have slight problems washing or dressing myselfModerate problems washing or dressing myselfI have severe problems washing or dressing myselfI am unable to wash or dress myself
Placebo (Randomized-withdrawal Period)98.30.90.90.00.0
SPD489 (Randomized-withdrawal Period)98.40.80.80.00.0

[back to top]

Changes in Brain Segmentation Volume Produced by Stimulant or Non-stimulant Medications in Patients With ADHD

"Brain segmentation volume measured in mm^3. We are reporting the mean difference in brain segmentation volume from baseline (pre-test) to 6 weeks (post-test).~No statistical analysis information is being submitted for the affected outcome measure. No statistical analyses have been performed or would be considered scientifically appropriate because actual enrollment fell well below target enrollment. Enrollment terminated early as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic." (NCT02259517)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
ADHD - Guanfacine-6137
ADHD - Lisdexamfetamine11833

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant changes in vital signs were reported. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SPD4890

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs was defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product and no later than 3 days following the last dose of investigational product. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 53)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SPD48986

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sleep Patterns Assessed by Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

Sleep patterns included sleep diary data and children's sleep habits questionnaire (CSHQ), which was parent report questionnaire designed to screen for the most common sleep problems in children, and consisted of 33 items for scoring and several extra items intended to provide administrators with other potentially useful information about respondents. The instrument evaluates the child's sleep based on behavior within 8 different sub scales: bedtime resistance, sleep-onset delay, sleep duration, sleep anxiety, night wakings, parasomnias, sleep-disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness. Each item receives a score from 1 (problem occurs rarely) to 3 (problem usually occurs); therefore, a higher score is the worse outcome. Scale ranges are as follows: bedtime resistance: 6 to 18, sleep onset delay: 1 to 3, sleep duration: 3 to 9, sleep anxiety: 4 to 12, night walkings: 3 to 9, parasomnias: 7 to 21, sleep-disordered breathing: 3 to 9, and daytime sleepiness: 8 to 24. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Bedtime Resistance: Week 52/ETSleep-onset Delay: Week 52/ETSleep Duration: Week 52/ETSleep Anxiety: Week 52/ETNight Wakings: Week 52/ETParasomnias: Week 52/ETSleep-disordered Breathing: Week 52/ETDaytime Sleepiness: Week 52/ET
SPD4898.91.63.85.54.28.63.410.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

Clinical laboratory evaluations included biochemistry and endocrinology, hematology, and urinalysis. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values were reported. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hematology: Eosinophils/Leukocytes: Greater than (>)10%Hematology: Hematocrit: Less than (<) 0.3Hematology: Leukocytes: <3 × 10^9/Liter (L)Hematology: Leukocytes: >16 × 10^9/LHematology: Lymphocytes/leukocytes: >70%Hematology: Neutrophils: <1 × 10^9/LHematology: Neutrophils/leukocytes: <30%Hematology: Platelets: <75 × 10^9/LBiochemistry and Endocrinology: Glucose: <3.05 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Biochemistry and Endocrinology: Glucose: >8.88 mmol/LBiochemistry and Endocrinology: Potassium: >5.5 mmol/LBiochemistry and Endocrinology: Protein: >90 gram per liter (g/L)Biochemistry and Endocrinology: Thyrotropin: < Lower limit of normal (LLN)Urinalysis: Ketones: Positive value (excluding trace)Urinalysis: Occult blood: Positive value (excluding trace)Urinalysis: Protein: Positive value (excluding trace)
SPD48912211111512211715230

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

"12-lead ECG was evaluated and recorded. ECG variables included heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, and corrected QT interval (QTc). The QTc was calculated using both Bazett (QTcB=QT/[RR]1/2) and Fridericia (QTcF=QT/[RR]1/3) corrections. Here, > = represents greater than or equal to, < represents lesser than and > represents greater than." (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate (< 55 Beats per minute)Heart Rate (> 130 Beats per minute)PR Interval (>= 200 millisecond [msec])QRS Interval (>= 90 msec)QT Interval (> = 440 msec)QTcB Interval (> = 440 msec and < 480 msec)QTcB Interval (>= 480 msec and < 500 msec)QTcB Interval (>= 500 msec)QTcF Interval (> = 440 msec and < 480 msec)QTcF Interval (>= 480 msec and < 500 msec)QTcF Interval (>= 500 msec)ECG InterpretationECG Abnormality - Rhythm
SPD4890003050000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Percentiles at Week 52/Early Termination (ET)

BMI was derived from height and weight. BMI was normalized by sex and age using the CDC growth charts. BMI percentiles were categorized as: Underweight (BMI < 5th percentile); Healthy weight (BMI 5th percentile up to < 85th percentile); Overweight (BMI 85th percentile < 95th percentile); Obese (BMI >= 95th percentile). Number of participants with shift from baseline in BMI percentile categories at Week 52/ET was reported. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Underweight: Week 52/ETHealthy Weight: Week 52/ETOverweight: Week 52/ETObese: Week 52/ET
SPD489878123

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-Administered Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was adapted from the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and provided examples appropriate for the developmental level of preschool children. The ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was an 18-item questionnaire that required the respondent to rate the frequency of occurrence of ADHD symptoms as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. The 18 items were grouped into 2 subscales: hyperactivity/impulsivity (even numbered items 2-18) and inattentiveness (odd numbered items 1-17). (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
SPD489-24.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

C-SSRS was semi-structured interview that captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview included definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. The C-SSRS contained 2 required items pertaining to suicidal ideation, 4 required items pertaining to suicidal behavior, and 1 required item pertaining to non-suicidal but self-injurious behavior. In situations where there was a positive response to the screening questions, there were 8 additional suicidal ideation items and 4 additional suicidal behavior items which were completed. Thus, there was a maximum of 19 items to be completed. Here number of participants responded as yes to suicidal ideation or behaviour were reported. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SPD4890

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 52/ Early Termination (ET)

CGI-I was an overall assessment of global symptom improvement by evaluation of the participant's condition severity and improvement over time. Scoring was done based on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), where higher score reported worse condition. The scoring was elaborated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. (NCT02466386)
Timeframe: Week 52/ET

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
SPD4892.0

[back to top]

Change in Score on Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV)

The BAARS-IV Self-Report consists of 27 symptoms that can be rated from 1 (never or rarely) to 4 (very often). The total range of scores is 1-108; a higher score indicates ADHD symptoms at a higher frequency. (NCT02635035)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine First23.27
Lisdexamfetamine Second23.1

[back to top]

Change in Score on Barkley Functional Impairment Scale (BFIS)

BFIS is designed to evaluate possible impairment in 15 major domains of psychosocial functioning in adults. The scale for each domain is 0 to 9 where 0 represents no impairment and 9 represents highest impairment. The total range is 0-135; the higher the score, the higher the impairment. (NCT02635035)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine First4.93
Lisdexamfetamine Second4.88

[back to top]

Assessing Task-oriented Monitoring in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Monitor Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Monitor was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.34
Placebo0.84

[back to top]

Assessing Total Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)

RCMAS is a self-report, 37-item questionnaire in which children agree (yes = 1) or disagree (no =0) to statements about themselves. A Total Anxiety score is computed based on 28 items, which are divided into 3 anxiety subscales: physiological anxiety (10 items), worry/oversensitivity (11 items), and social concerns/concentration (7 items). The remaining nine items on the RCMAS constitute the Lie (social desirability) subscale. The lowest scale score is 0 and the highest is 37. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Because scores are derived from affirmative responses, a high score indicates a high level of anxiety or lie on that subscale. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse-0.3
Placebo-0.56

[back to top]

Assessing Working Memory and Concentration in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Performance on the Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V)

Digit Span repeats strings of digits of increasing length said by the examiner. Participants were asked to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Every item on Digit Span consists of two trials. One point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. Zero points were given if the participant failed both trials. It measures working memory and concentration with a range of scaled scores from 0-19. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate better recall and attention. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)-0.27
Placebo-0.29

[back to top]

Assessing Ability to Tolerate Change in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Shift Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Shift was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.33
Placebo1

[back to top]

Assessing Anxiety-Depression Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used caregiver report form identifying problem behavior in children. The patient is rated on 113 items scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0=not true; 1=somewhat/sometimes true; 2=very true/often true). CBCL consists of eight empirically-based syndrome subscales. The range of subscale scores (summed) are: Aggressive Behavior (0-36), Anxious/Depressed (0-26), Attention Problems (0-20), Rule-Breaking Behavior (0-34), Somatic Complaints (0-22), Social Problems (0-22), Thought Problems (0-30), and Withdrawn/Depressed (0-16). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.44
Placebo0.76

[back to top]

Assessing Attention Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used caregiver report form identifying problem behavior in children. The patient is rated on 113 items scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0=not true; 1=somewhat/sometimes true; 2=very true/often true). CBCL consists of eight empirically-based syndrome subscales. The range of subscale scores (summed) are: Aggressive Behavior (0-36), Anxious/Depressed (0-26), Attention Problems (0-20), Rule-Breaking Behavior (0-34), Somatic Complaints (0-22), Social Problems (0-22), Thought Problems (0-30), and Withdrawn/Depressed (0-16). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.88
Placebo1.37

[back to top]

Assessing Behavior Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Behavior Regulation Index (BRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Behavior Regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)-0.04
Placebo0.48

[back to top]

Assessing Cognitive Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Cognitive Regulation Index (CRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Cognitive Regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.68
Placebo1.33

[back to top]

Assessing Emotion Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Emotion Regulation Index (ERI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Emotion regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.35
Placebo0.94

[back to top]

Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - CHILD SELF REPORT

"The BRIEF Self-Report Version assesses an adolescent's (ages 11-18) view of his or her cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functions. It is a validated 55-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Monitor, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, and Task Completion). For each item, the child rates whether they engage in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 55 (better performance) and the highest is 165 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). GEC was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.66
Placebo0.59

[back to top]

Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENT

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). GEC was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.51
Placebo1.16

[back to top]

Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form

The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Executive Functioning was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).Higher T-scores (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.97
Placebo1.79

[back to top]

Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Reaction Time (RT) Standard Error (SE) on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).

Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II) measure sustained attention and response inhibition. During the CPT-II, letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Hit Reaction Time (RT) Standard Error (SE) measures response speed consistency. The higher the Overall Standard Error, the greater the inconsistency in the response speed, indicating a greater amount of inattention. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.14
Placebo0.57

[back to top]

Assessing Inattentiveness in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Omissions on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).

Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II) measures sustained attention and response inhibition. During the CPT-II, letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Omission errors represented the number of times a participant fails to respond to target letters (all other than 'X'). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate greater inattentiveness. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.63
Placebo1.33

[back to top]

Assessing Inhibitory Control in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo Utilizing the Inhibit Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Inhibit was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)-0.05
Placebo0.42

[back to top]

Assessing Physical Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)

RCMAS is a self-report, 37-item questionnaire in which children agree (yes = 1) or disagree (no =0) to statements about themselves. A Total Anxiety score is computed based on 28 items, which are divided into 3 anxiety subscales: physiological anxiety (10 items), worry/oversensitivity (11 items), and social concerns/concentration (7 items). The remaining nine items on the RCMAS constitute the Lie (social desirability) subscale. The lowest scale score is 0 and the highest is 37. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Because scores are derived from affirmative responses, a high score indicates a high level of anxiety or lie on that subscale. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.12
Placebo-0.23

[back to top]

Assessing Representational Memory in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Working Memory Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Working Memory was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.96
Placebo1.69

[back to top]

Assessing Severity of Symptoms Associated With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form

The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Inattention scale was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)1.00
Placebo1.76

[back to top]

Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Hit Reaction Time (RT) Block Change on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).

Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II) measures sustained attention and response inhibition. During the CPT-II, letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Overall hit reaction time is the average speed of correct responses for the entire test. Lower values indicate that responses got quicker as the test progressed. High values indicate a substantial slowing in reaction times. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Vyvanse0.75
Placebo1.19

[back to top]

Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Perseverations on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).

Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II) measures sustained attention and response inhibition. During the CPT-II, letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). CPT-II Perseverations represent responses in which reaction time was less than 100 ms; these responses are assumed to be anticipatory, random, or slow/inattentive (i.e., carried over from the previous response) because it is physiologically impossible to respond accurately in so short a time. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1) to have them on a uniform metric. Higher scores indicate greater inattentiveness. (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)1.02
Placebo0.86

[back to top]

Assessing Ability to Begin Tasks in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Initiate Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS

"The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior never (=1), sometimes (=2), or often (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Initiate was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1)." (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.64
Placebo1.23

[back to top]

Assessing Hyperactivity in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form

The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Hyperactivity was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). (NCT02712996)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse)0.075
Placebo0.71

[back to top]

Brain Activation (BOLD Percent Signal Change)

To measure the effects of Lisdexamfetamine on objective report of executive function difficulties functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were utilized to assess the relative importance of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) blood oxygen dependent (BOLD) signals during working memory task performance and the effect of LDX on the executive system activation. Measurement of BOLD perecent signal change range is 0 to 2%. Percent signal change is the difference in fMRI signal between the baseline condition (B) and the task condition (T) and calculated here as: percent signal change = (T-B)/B×100%. Higher percent signal change in the DLPFC is generally associated with better executive function. (NCT03187353)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of signal change (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Per Intervention).42
Placebo (Per Intervention).21

[back to top]

Brain Activation (Glutamate Contrast)

To measure the effects of Lisdexamfetamine on objective report of executive function difficulties proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) was utilized to assess the relative importance of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) glutamate (Glut) contrast levels during working memory task performance. Measurement of glutamate contrast range from 0 to 15% with higher levels associated with optimal performance. Glutamate contrast is calculated by: GluCEST contrast (%) = [(Msat(-3ppm) - Msat(+3ppm))/Msat(-3ppm)]*100. (NCT03187353)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of Glutmate Contrast (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Per Intervention)8.4
Placebo (Per Intervention)8.91

[back to top]

Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS) Change Score (End of Trial Minus Baseline).

The Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS) (Brown, 1996) is a 40-item questionnaire that assesses five subscales of executive functioning. For each item in the questionnaire, participants reported the extent to which it had been a problem over the last six months (0 = never, 1 = once a week or less, 2 = twice a week, or 3 = almost daily). Total BADDS scores can range from 0-120, with higher scores indicating more self-reported difficulties with executive functioning. Outcome measures are reported as change scores for end of trial (6 weeks) minus baseline. (NCT03187353)
Timeframe: Outcome measure change score represents end of trial (6 weeks) minus baseline.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lisdexamfetamine (Per Intervention)-19.68
Placebo (Per Intervention)-4.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 6

BMI was derived from height and weight. BMI percentile was normalized by sex and age using the CDC growth charts. BMI percentiles were categorized as: Underweight (BMI < 5th percentile); Healthy weight (BMI 5th percentile up to < 85th percentile); Overweight (BMI 85th percentile < 95th percentile); Obese (BMI >= 95th percentile). Change from baseline in body mass index at Week 6 was reported. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionBMI percentile (Mean)
Placebo-1.6
SPD489 5 mg-0.9
SPD489 10 mg-5.1
SPD489 20 mg-6.7
SPD489 30 mg-7.4

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6

CGI-I was an overall assessment of global symptom improvement by evaluation of the participant's condition severity and improvement over time. Scoring was done based on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), where higher score reported worse condition. The scoring was elaborated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. FAS consisted of all participants in the safety analysis set who had at least 1 post-dose ADHD RS IV preschool version total score assessment. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.4
Pooled SPD489 Doses (10, 20, and 30 mg)2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 6

Body weight was measured in percentile without shoes. Body weight percentile was normalized by sex and age using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts. Body weight percentiles were categorized as lesser than (<) 5th, 5th to < 95th, and greater than or equal to (>=) 95th percentiles. Change from baseline in body weight at Week 6 was reported. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionWeight percentile (Mean)
Placebo-1.1
SPD489 5 mg-1.0
SPD489 10 mg-2.8
SPD489 20 mg-4.8
SPD489 30 mg-5.8

[back to top]

Dose Response Relationship for Change From Baseline in ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version Total Score in Preschool Children at Week 6

Dose response relationship was evaluated by using the ADHD-RS Preschool Version Total Score. ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was adapted from the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and provided examples appropriate for the developmental level of preschool children. The ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was an 18-item questionnaire that requires the respondent to rate the frequency of occurrence of ADHD symptoms as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. The 18 items were grouped into 2 subscales: hyperactivity/impulsivity (even numbered items 2-18) and inattentiveness (odd numbered items 1-17). Dose response analysis set consisted of all participants in the safety analysis set who had at least 1 valid primary efficacy measurement on the randomized target dose level of the investigational product. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-9.1
SPD489 30 mg-15.3
SPD489 20 mg-17.0
SPD489 10 mg-10.8
SPD489 5 mg-13.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS was semi-structured interview that captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The interview included definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. The C-SSRS contained 2 required items pertaining to suicidal ideation, 4 required items pertaining to suicidal behavior, and 1 required item pertaining to non-suicidal but self-injurious behavior. In situations where there was a positive response to the screening questions, there were 8 additional suicidal ideation items and 4 additional suicidal behavior items which were completed. Thus, there was a maximum of 19 items to be completed. Here number of participants responded as yes to suicidal ideation or behaviour were reported. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Up to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo0
SPD489 5 mg1
SPD489 10 mg1
SPD489 20 mg1
SPD489 30 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a investigational product (IP) and that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of IP and no later than 3 days following the last dose of IP. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 7)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo19
SPD489 5 mg13
SPD489 10 mg15
SPD489 20 mg18
SPD489 30 mg22

[back to top]

Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) at Week 6

Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire was a tool designed to screen the most common sleep problems in children, and consisted of 33 items for scoring. The instrument evaluated the child's sleep based on behavior within 8 different subscales: bedtime resistance, sleep-onset delay, sleep duration, sleep anxiety, night walkings, parasomnias, sleep-disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness. Each item receives a score from 1 (problem occurs rarely) to 3 (problem usually occurs); therefore, a higher score is the worse outcome. Scale ranges are as follows: bedtime resistance: 6 to 18, sleep onset delay: 1 to 3, sleep duration: 3 to 9, sleep anxiety: 4 to 12, night walkings: 3 to 9, parasomnias: 7 to 21, sleep-disordered breathing: 3 to 9, daytime sleepiness: 8 to 24, and total disturbance (items from all scales): 33 to 99. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Week 6

,,,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Bedtime resistance: Week 6Sleep-onset delay: Week 6Sleep duration: Week 6Sleep anxiety: Week 6Night wakings: Week 6Parasomnias: Week 6Sleep-disordered breathing: Week 6Daytime sleepiness: Week 6
Placebo9.71.73.95.74.78.63.510.9
SPD489 10 mg10.31.83.96.54.68.83.310.3
SPD489 20 mg10.21.84.16.54.38.23.49.8
SPD489 30 mg10.31.84.16.44.18.43.512.4
SPD489 5 mg9.41.73.95.84.28.93.610.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values

Clinical laboratory evaluations included biochemistry and endocrinology, hematology, and urinalysis. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values were reported. ULN in measure data represents upper limit of normal, mcmol/L represents to Micromoles Per Litre, > = represents greater than or equal to. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Week 6

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eosinophils/Leukocytes: Greater than (>)10%Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: Greater than (>) 70%Neutrophils/Leukocytes: Less than (<) 30%Platelets: >600x10^9/Litre (L)Alanine aminotransferase: >= 3x ULNAspartate aminotransferase: >=3x ULNCreatinine: >176.8 mcmol/L or >1.5x ULNGlucose: <3.05 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Glucose: >8.88 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Potassium: >5.5 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Ketones: Positive value (excluding trace)Occult blood: Positive value (excluding trace)Protein: Positive value (excluding trace)
Placebo1160110101117
SPD489 10 mg2010000010213
SPD489 20 mg5030001000314
SPD489 30 mg0011000000335
SPD489 5 mg0020000100001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant changes in ECG parameters were reported. QTcF interval represents QT Fridericia's Correction Formula interval, QTcB interval represents QTc corrected by Bazett's in measure data. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Week 6

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate (< 55 Beats per minute)Heart Rate (> 130 Beats per minute)QRS Interval (> = 90 millisecond [msec])QT Interval (> = 440 msec)QTcB Interval (> =440 msec and <480 msec)QTcB Interval (>=480 msec and <500 msec)QTcB Interval (>=500 msec)QTcF Interval (> =440 msec and <480 msec)QTcF Interval (>=480 msec and <500 msec)QTcF Interval (>=500 msec)ECG Abnormality - Rhythm
Placebo00101000000
SPD489 10 mg00002000000
SPD489 20 mg00103000000
SPD489 30 mg00202000000
SPD489 5 mg00101000001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Vital sign assessments included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), average pulse rate. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant changes in vital signs were reported. mmHg represents millimetre of mercury in the outcome measure data. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Week 6

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pulse: >=130 beats per minute (bpm), Week 6Pulse: <=55 bpm, Week 6Systolic Blood Pressure (BP): >=120 mmHg, Week 6Systolic BP: <75 mmHg, Week 6Diastolic BP: >=85 mmHg, Week 6Diastolic BP: <40 mmHg, Week 6
Placebo000000
SPD489 10 mg000000
SPD489 20 mg001000
SPD489 30 mg000000
SPD489 5 mg000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Height at Week 6

Height was measured in inche without shoes, with the participant stood on a flat surface and with chin parallel to the floor. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionCentimeter (Mean)
Placebo0.7
SPD489 5 mg0.7
SPD489 10 mg0.7
SPD489 20 mg1.0
SPD489 30 mg0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-Administered Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Preschool Version Total Score at Week 6

ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was adapted from the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and provided examples appropriate for the developmental level of preschool children. The ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version was an 18-item questionnaire that required the respondent to rate the frequency of occurrence of ADHD symptoms as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. The 18 items were grouped into 2 subscales: hyperactivity/impulsivity (even numbered items 2-18) and inattentiveness (odd numbered items 1-17). Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants in the safety analysis set who had at least 1 post-dose ADHD RS IV preschool version total score assessment. (NCT03260205)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-9.1
Pooled SPD489 Doses (10, 20, and 30 mg)-14.2

[back to top]

Ratings of Job Interview Performance

Three coders who are unaware of the study participant identities or group status will view the job interview videotape and completed a form. Raters will provide a rating of their overall impression of the interview behavior ranging from a score of one (Poor) to four (Outstanding). The average score of the coders will be utilized as a dependent measure. (NCT03446885)
Timeframe: during interventional study session, 1 day in duration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.17
Vyvanse3.33

[back to top]

Ratings of Job Application Quality

"Three independent coders will review each de-identified application. Following the review of the application, coders will complete a rating form that asks them to make an overall evaluation regarding whether the person was an acceptable job candidate for an interview using a scale of 1 (definitely not) to 5 (definitely). Average rating across coders will be used as the dependent measure." (NCT03446885)
Timeframe: during interventional study session, 1 day in duration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.40
Vyvanse3.56

[back to top]

Inattentive/Overactive Rating

In addition to ratings of the interview performance, the rater also will complete the five-item inattentive/overactive (I/O) factor of the Iowa Conners rating scale (Atkins, Pelham, & Licht, 1989; Loney & Milich, 1982; Pelham, Milich, Murphy, & Murphy, 1989). The five items are rated on a scale of Not at all (0) to Very Much (3) and the sum of these items represents the score. The dependent measure will be the score averaged across raters. Scores can range from 0-3 on each item, and the average score of the 5 items was used. Higher scores reflect greater inattentive/overactivity-related behaviors. (NCT03446885)
Timeframe: during interventional study session, 1 day in duration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo2.13
Vyvanse2.01

[back to top]

Objective Observation of Workplace Productivity

The dependent measures from this aspect of the study are the number of items completed correctly out of the total number of assigned items (i.e., 225). Thus, the score reflects the percentage of items correctly completed out of the 225 assigned and scores could range from 0-100. (NCT03446885)
Timeframe: during interventional study session, 1 day in duration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo65.60
Vyvanse68.45

[back to top]