Page last updated: 2024-12-08

estradiol 3-benzoate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

17beta-estradiol 3-benzoate : A benzoate ester resulting from the formal condensation of benzoic acid with the phenolic hydroxy group of 17beta-estradiol. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID222757
CHEMBL ID282575
CHEBI ID77006
SCHEMBL ID174896
MeSH IDM0200617

Synonyms (210)

Synonym
BIDD:ER0126
MLS002207215
(17beta)-17-hydroxyestra-1(10),2,4-trien-3-yl benzoate
benzoato de estradiol [inn-spanish]
reglovar
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol (17-beta)-3-benzoate
oestradioli benzoas
estradioli benzoas [inn-latin]
estradiol benzoate (van)
estradiol-17beta 3-benzoate
oestraform (bdh)
nsc 9566
benzo-ginestryl
benztrone
oestradiolum benzoylatum
gynecormone gouttes
estradiolo benzoato [dcit]
oestradiolum benzoicum
estradiol-17-beta-3-benzoate
benzoic acid estradiol
ccris 281
benzo-gineostril
benzoate d'oestradiol [french]
ostrin
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol, (17beta)-, 3-benzoate
benzoate d'estradiol [inn-french]
einecs 200-043-7
agofollin depot
estradiol benzoate [inn]
primogyn b oleosum
ai3-52465
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-beta-diol, 3-benzoate
brn 3107526
metroval
17beta-estradiol monobenzoate
17-beta-estradiol benzoate
17-beta-oestradiol 3-benzoate
oestradiol 3-benzoate
estradiolo amsa
dihydrofolliculine benzoate
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17beta-diol, 3-benzoate
progynon b
benzofoline
benzogynoestryl
ovocyclin benzoate
primogyn b
ebz ,
eston-b
oestradiol monobenzoate
estradiol-17.beta. 3-benzoate
50-50-0
follicormon
follidrin
gynformone
hormogynon
1,5(10)-estratriene-3,17.beta.-diol 3-benzoate
progynon-b
estradiol 3-benzoate
unistradiol
benovocylin
de graafina
.beta.-estradiol 3-benzoate
diogyn b
17.beta.-estradiol 3-benzoate
estradiol benzoate
estra-1,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol (17.beta.)-, 3-benzoate
estradiol monobenzoate
ovahormon benzoate
17.beta.-estradiol monobenzoate
nsc-9566
estra-1,5(10)-triene-3,17.beta.-diol, 3-benzoate
17.beta.-estradiol benzoate
gynecormone
graafina
oestradiol benzoate
dihydrofolliculin benzoate
progynon benzoate
dihydroestrin benzoate
diffollisterol
dimenformon benzoate
nsc9566
ovocyclin-mb
hydroxyestrin benzoate
estradiol-17.beta. benzoate
estradiol, 3-benzoate
primogyn i
benzhormovarine
ovasterol-b
.beta.-estradiol benzoate
hidroestron
benzo-gynoestryl
oestroform [bdh]
solestro
femestrone
dimenformone
difolliculine
benzoestrofol difolliculin
wln: l e5 b666ttt&j e1 fq oovr
ovocyclin m
benzoestrofol
17-beta-estradiol 3-benzoate
beta-estradiol 3-benzoate, >=97%
NCGC00021274-03
D01953
estradiol benzoate (jp17/usp)
MLS000028477 ,
smr000058343
beta-estradiol 3-benzoate
difolliculin
chebi:77006 ,
benzestrofol
beta-estradiol benzoate
CHEMBL282575
benzogynestryl
[(13s,17s)-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] benzoate
E0329
[(8r,9s,13s,14s,17s)-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] benzoate
ST075190
(8r,9s,13s,14s,17s)-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-7,8,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-decahydro-6h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl benzoate;17beta-estradiol benzoate; 1,3,5(10)-estratriene-3,17b-diol 3-benzoate; 3,17b-dihydroxy-1,3,5(10)-estratriene 3-benzoate
A828140
dtxsid9022998 ,
dtxcid902998
cas-50-50-0
tox21_110868
AKOS015955542
HMS2232P14
S4110
benzoato de estradiol
1s4cjb5zgn ,
17beta-estradiol 3-benzoate
benzoate d'oestradiol
estradiol benzoate [usp:inn:ban:jan]
benzoate d'estradiol
4-09-00-00406 (beilstein handbook reference)
estradiolo benzoato
unii-1s4cjb5zgn
estradioli benzoas
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17beta-diol 3-benzoate
folone
mesalin
estrogin
estradiol benzoate [mart.]
estradiol benzoate [ep monograph]
estradiol 3-benzoate [mi]
estradiol benzoate [who-dd]
estradiol benzoate [usp impurity]
estradiol benzoate [usp-rs]
estradiol benzoate [jan]
estradiol benzoate [green book]
estradiol benzoate [usp monograph]
SCHEMBL174896
CS-4780
.beta.-oestradiol 3-benzoate
primogyn boleosum
(17.beta.)-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol 3-benzoate
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17.beta.-diol, 3-benzoate
1,3,5(10)-oestratriene-3,17-.beta.-diol 3-benzoate
3-benzoyloxy-17.beta.-hydroxyestra-1,3,5(10)-triene
1,3,5(10)-estratriene-3,17.beta.-diol 3-benzoate
.beta.-oestradiol benzoate
17-.beta.-oestradiol 3-benzoate
17-hydroxyestra-1(10),2,4-trien-3-yl benzoate, (17.beta.)-
oestraform
pelanin benzoate
Q-201505
(17?)-17-hydroxyestra-1(10),2,4-trien-3-yl benzoate
benzoic acid [(8r,9s,13s,14s,17s)-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] ester
cid_222757
bdbm56905
[(8r,9s,13s,14s,17s)-13-methyl-17-oxidanyl-6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] benzoate
HY-B1192
(17beta)-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol 3-benzoate
estradiol (benzoate) ,
SR-01000003080-3
sr-01000003080
i(2)-estradiol 3-benzoate
beta-estradiol 3-benzoate, vetranal(tm), analytical standard
estradiol benzoate, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
estradiol benzoate, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
ss-estradiol 3-benzoate
3,17ss-dihydroxy-1,3,5(10)-estratriene 3-benzoate
3-benzoyloxy-17ss-estrol
estradiol benzoate for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
(8r,9s,13s,14s,17s)-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-7,8,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-decahydro-6h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl benzoate
NCGC00021274-05
DB13953
diffolisterol,(s)
AS-13030
BCP09252
Q11450699
AMY22166
estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol (17b)-, 3-benzoate
estradiol-benzoate
CCG-268370
NCGC00021274-04
D97619
estradiol benzoate for system suitability
(1s,3as,3br,9bs,11as)-1-hydroxy-11a-methyl-1h,2h,3h,3ah,3bh,4h,5h,9bh,10h,11h,11ah-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-7-yl benzoate
EN300-19631609
(17beta)estra-1,3,5(10)triene-3,17-diol-3-benzoate
estradiol benzoate (ep monograph)
estradiol benzoate (usp impurity)
estradiol benzoate coarse grade
benzoate d'estradiol (inn-french)
estradiol benzoate (usp:inn:ban:jan)
estradiol benzoate (usp-rs)
estradiol benzoate (usp monograph)
estradioli benzoas (inn-latin)
benzoato de estradiol (inn-spanish)
estradiol benzoate (mart.)

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" These results indicate that the toxic effects of E2B are detectable by administration for 2 weeks at an appropriate dose level."( Collaborative work to evaluate toxicity on male reproductive organs by repeated dose studies in rats 1). Effects of 2-weeks daily administration of estradiol benzoate.
Asano, S; Hata, J; Nakahara, C; Namiki, A; Takahashi, H; Uno, H, 2000
)
0.31
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" In contrast, CC+EB synergistically inflicted more adverse effects as apoptotic germ cells per tubule rose further."( Clomiphene citrate potentiates the adverse effects of estrogen on rat testis and down-regulates the expression of steroidogenic enzyme genes.
Bharti, S; Misro, MM; Rai, U, 2013
)
0.39
"The above findings indicate that CC in the presence of estrogen synergistically potentiates more adverse effects in testis, inhibiting expression of upstream steroidogenic enzyme genes and leading to disruption of steroidogenesis."( Clomiphene citrate potentiates the adverse effects of estrogen on rat testis and down-regulates the expression of steroidogenic enzyme genes.
Bharti, S; Misro, MM; Rai, U, 2013
)
0.39

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The present study was conducted to investigate the possible pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution profiles of four major bioactive constituents (berberine, protopine, tetrahydrocoptisine and tetrahydropalmatine) after oral administration of XFSWE in dysmenorrheal symptom rats, and to compare the difference between normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats."( Comparisons of pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution profile of four major bioactive components after oral administration of Xiang-Fu-Si-Wu Decoction effective fraction in normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats.
Duan, JA; Guo, JM; Li, W; Li, ZH; Liu, P; Qian, DW; Shang, EX; Su, SL; Tang, YP, 2014
)
0.4
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods."( Comparisons of pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution profile of four major bioactive components after oral administration of Xiang-Fu-Si-Wu Decoction effective fraction in normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats.
Duan, JA; Guo, JM; Li, W; Li, ZH; Liu, P; Qian, DW; Shang, EX; Su, SL; Tang, YP, 2014
)
0.4
"This study was the first report about pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution investigation in dysmenorrheal symptom animals."( Comparisons of pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution profile of four major bioactive components after oral administration of Xiang-Fu-Si-Wu Decoction effective fraction in normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats.
Duan, JA; Guo, JM; Li, W; Li, ZH; Liu, P; Qian, DW; Shang, EX; Su, SL; Tang, YP, 2014
)
0.4

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Estrous synchronization using a Controlled Internal Drug Releasing device (CIDR) in combination with GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) treatment was investigated in Japanese black cows characterized with initial ovarian conditions."( Estrous synchronization using an intravaginal progesterone device in combination with gnrh or estradiol benzoate characterized by the initial ovarian conditions in Japanese black cows.
Ando, T; Hamana, K; Kamimura, S, 2004
)
0.32
"With the aim of establishing a sensitive model for the detection of weak effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on thyroid carcinogenesis, thyrotrophic and tumor-promoting influences of beta-estradiol-3-benzoate (EB) in combination with representative antithyroidal agents (goitrogens), sulfadimethoxine (SDM), propylthiouracil (PTU), potassium perchlorate (PPC), iopanoic acid (IOP) or an iodine-deficient diet were evaluated in a short-term (7-day) experiment without N-bis(2-hydroxypropyl)nitrosamine (DHPN) initiation and a long-term (30-week) experiment with DHPN initiation in ovariectomized F344 rats."( Comparison of enhancing effects of different goitrogen treatments in combination with beta-estradiol-3-benzoate for establishing a rat two-stage thyroid carcinogenesis model to detect modifying effects of estrogenic compounds.
Hirose, M; Imai, T; Onodera, H; Takizawa, T; Ueda, M, 2006
)
0.33
"Yougui pill combined with Buzhong Yiqi decoction (YPBYD) is used to relieve sexual dysfunction in clinical practice."( Efficacy of Yougui pill combined with Buzhong Yiqi decoction in alleviating the sexual dysfunction in female rats through modulation of the gut microbiota.
Jiao, W; Shi, C; Shi, G; Wang, Y; Yu, W, 2022
)
0.72

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" A dose-response relationship was identified for lordosis in experimental animals receiving icv injection of beta-EP."( Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of beta-endorphin on lordosis in female rats: relation to time of administration.
Kubo, K; Sasaki, T; Torii, M, 1999
)
0.3
" The current project was designed to determine the dose-response relationship of the prostate gland to estradiol exposure during the developmentally critical neonatal period in the rat."( Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: I. Effects on the prostate gland.
Cooper, RL; Kim, S; LeBlanc, GA; Prins, GS; Putz, O; Schwartz, CB, 2001
)
0.31
" The current project was designed to determine the dose-response relationship between neonatal estradiol exposure and the development of the male reproductive tract in the rat."( Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: II. Effects on male puberty and the reproductive tract.
Cooper, RL; LeBlanc, GA; Prins, GS; Putz, O; Schwartz, CB, 2001
)
0.31
" Ovary weight, uterus weight, peak plasma GH concentration, and hepatic CYP2A1 content were decreased 37 days after treatment with tamoxifen at a dosage of 20 mg/kg, but expression of other P450 enzymes was not affected."( Persistent suppression of hepatic CYP2A1 expression and serum triiodothyronine levels by tamoxifen in intact female rats: dose-response analysis and comparison with 4-hydroxytamoxifen, fulvestrant (ICI 182,780), and 17beta-estradiol-3-benzoate.
Bandiera, SM; Ickenstein, LM, 2002
)
0.31
" In Experiment 4, a high dosage of 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone was more anxiolytic than a high dosage of estradiol benzoate, suggesting that testosterone action may require 5alpha-reduction."( Testosterone rapidly reduces anxiety in male house mice (Mus musculus).
Aikey, JL; Anmuth, DM; James, PJ; Nyby, JG, 2002
)
0.31
"Certain dosage of estradiol benzoate has proliferating effect on normal human breast tissue."( [The effect of estrogen benzoate on normal human breast tissue implanted into athymic nude mice].
Deng, WH; Li, YC; Lu, X; Wu, YY; Yang, L, 2003
)
0.32
" In contrast, ATRA, administered to female rats under dosing conditions which suppressed the LH surge, neither changed the levels of unoccupied ER nor altered the estrogen induced up-regulation of progesterone receptor mRNA."( Evidence that atrazine and diaminochlorotriazine inhibit the estrogen/progesterone induced surge of luteinizing hormone in female Sprague-Dawley rats without changing estrogen receptor action.
Andersen, ME; Handa, RJ; Hanneman, WH; Lund, TD; McMullin, TS; Nagahara, A; Pak, T, 2004
)
0.32
" Experiment 2 was a dose-response study of the influence of fluoxetine (0."( Chronic fluoxetine suppresses circulating estrogen and the enhanced spatial learning of estrogen-treated ovariectomized rats.
Farr, S; Klinga, K; Taylor, GT; Weiss, J, 2004
)
0.32
"High dosage of E2 B neonatally administrated to rats damages the fluid reabsorption capacity of efferent ductuli."( [Influence of estradiol benzoate on fluid reabsorption capacity of rat efferent ductuli].
Chen, XC; Wang, DZ; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XB; Zhou, QH; Zhou, XH, 2005
)
0.33
" Similar to the induction of song-control nuclei in females, dosing with EB10 and EB100 increased and masculinized another highly differentiated behavior: nest-building."( Post-hatch oral estrogen exposure reduces oviduct and egg mass and alters nest-building behavior in adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
Heiblum, R; Millam, JR; Rochester, JR; Rozenboim, I, 2008
)
0.35
" RWA was increased in estrogen-treated mice, and these effects followed an inverted-U dose-response curve."( Estradiol modulates behavioral arousal and induces changes in gene expression profiles in brain regions involved in the control of vigilance.
Devidze, N; Pfaff, DW; Ribeiro, AC, 2009
)
0.35
" Area-under-the curve analyses showed that total glucagon and corticosterone release was greater in EB- versus oil-implanted rats after both single and serial dosing with HN."( Adaptation of feeding and counter-regulatory hormone responses to intermediate insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in the ovariectomised female rat: effects of oestradiol.
Briski, KP; Nedungadi, TP, 2009
)
0.35
" ARH InsRb gene profiles were decreased, relative to baseline, after either one or four NPH injections in OVX + EB rats; mean mRNA levels were significantly lower after serial dosing since basal InsRb transcripts were diminished by precedent NPH treatment."( Adaptation of arcuate insulin receptor, estrogen receptor-alpha, estrogen receptor-beta, and type-II glucocorticoid receptor gene profiles to chronic intermediate insulin-induced hypoglycemia in estrogen-treated ovariectomized female rats.
Briski, KP; Genabai, NK, 2010
)
0.36
" In this study, zebra finch nestlings were orally dosed with estradiol benzoate (at 1, 10, or 100 nmol/g BW per day, post-hatch days 5 to 11 [EB1, EB10, and EB100, respectively])."( Post-hatch oral estrogen in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): is infertility due to disrupted testes morphology or reduced copulatory behavior?
Forstmeier, W; Millam, JR; Rochester, JR, 2010
)
0.36
" In the current study, time course and dose-response experiments demonstrated that two once daily doses of EB is the minimum needed to induce the desensitization response as indicated by 5-HT(1A) receptor-stimulated release of oxytocin and that 10 μg/kg/day EB produces the maximal response, a partial desensitization of approximately 40%."( Estradiol induces partial desensitization of serotonin 1A receptor signaling in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and alters expression and interaction of RGSZ1 and Gαz.
Carrasco, GA; Creech, RD; Li, Q; Muma, NA; Van de Kar, LD, 2012
)
0.38
" There was a dose-response effect of E(2)B on the expression of MMP-9 mRNA and, possibly, MMP-2 mRNA."( Effect of estrogen therapy on vascular perlecan and metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in castrated rats.
Coulson-Thomas, V; Fernandes, CE; Pinhal, MA; Pompei, LM; Romanini, AC; Souza, PZ; Steiner, ML; Theodoro, TR, 2013
)
0.39
" However, acute EB treatment resulted in a rightward shift in the cocaine dose-response curve; rats demonstrated a significant preference at only the moderate and high conditioning doses of cocaine (10 and 15mg/kg)."( Acute estradiol treatment affects the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in ovariectomized female rats.
Bobzean, SA; Dennis, TS; Perrotti, LI, 2014
)
0.4
"05) in Cmax, Tmax, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞) and CL/F between normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats that orally administered with same dosage of XFSWE."( Comparisons of pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution profile of four major bioactive components after oral administration of Xiang-Fu-Si-Wu Decoction effective fraction in normal and dysmenorrheal symptom rats.
Duan, JA; Guo, JM; Li, W; Li, ZH; Liu, P; Qian, DW; Shang, EX; Su, SL; Tang, YP, 2014
)
0.4
"A dose-response study was made of the broad-spectrum gonadal steroid agonist tibolone (TBL) on lordosis behavior in estradiol benzoate (EB: 5 µg) primed rats."( Tibolone facilitates lordosis behavior through estrogen, progestin, and GnRH-1 receptors in estrogen-primed rats.
Domínguez-Ordoñez, R; García-Juárez, M; González-Flores, O; Lima-Hernández, FJ; Montes-Narváez, O; Pfaus, JG, 2020
)
0.56
" In brief, a total of 148 Sprague-Dawley rats (offspring) were dosed with estradiol benzoate (EB) on postnatal days (PNDs) 1, 3 and 5, and subsequently dosed with testosterone (T)/estradiol (E) tubes via subcutaneous implants from PND 90 to 200."( Distinct lipid signatures are identified in the plasma of rats with chronic inflammation induced by estradiol benzoate and sex hormones.
Beger, RD; Cao, Z; Nakamura, N; Pence, LM, 2020
)
0.56
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
xenoestrogenA synthetic or semi-synthetic compound that has oestrogenic activity.
estrogen receptor agonistAn agonist at the estrogen receptor.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
benzoate esterEsters of benzoic acid or substituted benzoic acids.
17beta-hydroxy steroidA 17-hydroxy steroid in which the hydroxy group at position 17 has a beta-configuration.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (48)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency112.20200.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
Chain A, CruzipainTrypanosoma cruziPotency19.95260.002014.677939.8107AID1476
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency16.94410.007215.758889.3584AID588342
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.30960.01846.806014.1254AID624172
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.92900.004110.890331.5287AID504466
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency56.23410.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.78820.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.00690.000221.22318,912.5098AID743035; AID743036; AID743040; AID743053; AID743063
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency6.00700.000214.376460.0339AID720692
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.16440.000229.305416,493.5996AID743075; AID743077; AID743091
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency33.78580.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
heat shock 70kDa protein 5 (glucose-regulated protein, 78kDa)Homo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.016525.307841.3999AID602332
serine-protein kinase ATM isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency17.78280.707925.111941.2351AID485349
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.006026.168889.1251AID540317
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.59620.00419.984825.9290AID504444
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.01789.637444.6684AID588834
huntingtin isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.22020.000618.41981,122.0200AID2673
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A isoform 2 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.010323.856763.0957AID2662
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.98560.004611.374133.4983AID624296; AID624297
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency3.61250.005612.367736.1254AID624032
survival motor neuron protein isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.125912.234435.4813AID1458
muscleblind-like protein 1 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency79.43280.00419.962528.1838AID2675
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.57170.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.78580.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.78580.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.78580.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.78580.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Estrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.06500.00000.723732.7000AID625258
Estrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.01800.00000.42297.9070AID625258
Glucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)5.07400.00000.495310.0000AID625263
Glucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki2.30600.00010.38637.0010AID625263
Tyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)22.99400.00021.67898.6800AID625185
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)5.07400.00150.76005.0740AID625263
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki2.30600.00070.76537.0010AID625263
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)17.22900.00041.877310.0000AID625207
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki17.08700.00322.28879.3160AID625207
Adenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)21.78000.00001.89408.5470AID625196
Adenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)Ki12.31200.00000.930610.0000AID625196
Androgen receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.01000.00101.979414.1600AID625228
Androgen receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00700.00031.21858.9270AID625228
Alpha-1B adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)21.78000.00021.874210.0000AID625196
Alpha-1B adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki12.31200.00010.949010.0000AID625196
Alpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)24.65000.00001.47257.8980AID625203
Alpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki3.58200.00030.483410.0000AID625203
Glycine receptor subunit betaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)5.07400.00150.76005.0740AID625263
Glycine receptor subunit betaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki2.30600.00070.78467.0010AID625263
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)5.07400.00150.80445.0740AID625263
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki2.30600.00070.78467.0010AID625263
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)17.22900.00081.541620.0000AID625207
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki17.08700.00031.465610.0000AID625207
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)5.07400.00150.76005.0740AID625263
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki2.30600.00070.78467.0010AID625263
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.67200.00010.86458.7096AID625222
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)Ki1.95100.00000.70488.1930AID625222
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.56500.00011.18738.9125AID625217
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)Ki7.35900.00030.769310.0000AID625217
Alpha-1A adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)21.78000.00001.819410.0000AID625196
Alpha-1A adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki12.31200.00000.965010.0000AID625196
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
streptokinase A precursorStreptococcus pyogenes M1 GASEC50 (µMol)2.17750.06008.9128130.5170AID1902; AID1914
Sex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)Kd1.14810.00020.34964.7863AID318680
Estrogen receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)2.43100.006022.3670130.5170AID1914
Estrogen receptor betaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)2.43100.006022.3670130.5170AID1914
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (366)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
antral ovarian follicle growthEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phospholipase C activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of toll-like receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle cell apoptotic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell differentiationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex assemblyEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
uterus developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
vagina developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate epithelial cord elongationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate epithelial cord arborization involved in prostate glandular acinus morphogenesisEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of branching involved in prostate gland morphogenesisEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland branching involved in pregnancyEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland alveolus developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferation involved in mammary gland duct elongationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein localization to chromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estradiol stimulusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of epithelial cell apoptotic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estrogen stimulusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of gluconeogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromosome segregationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid metabolic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
gene expressionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
microglia differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenal gland developmentGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glucocorticoid biosynthetic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, glutamatergicGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maternal behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular glucocorticoid receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid mediated signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
astrocyte differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell divisionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland duct morphogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
motor behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to steroid hormone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dexamethasone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuroinflammatory responseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to singlet oxygenTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
neuron migrationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
stimulatory C-type lectin receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
heart processTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled glutamate receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
axon guidanceTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
learningTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
feeding behaviorTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell shapeTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
gene expressionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of hydrogen peroxide biosynthetic processTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron projection developmentTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
forebrain developmentTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
T cell costimulationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein ubiquitinationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular signal transductionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulusTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
Fc-gamma receptor signaling pathway involved in phagocytosisTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein catabolic processTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT proteinTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite morphogenesisTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
activated T cell proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
T cell receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
leukocyte migrationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of painTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein targeting to membraneTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spine maintenanceTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein localization to nucleusTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glutamate receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dendritic spine maintenanceTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
response to amyloid-betaTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amyloid-betaTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to L-glutamateTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glycineTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein localization to membraneTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion import across plasma membraneTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
activation of adenylate cyclase activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
response to woundingAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of norepinephrine secretionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of norepinephrine secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vasoconstrictionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
platelet activationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase B activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epinephrine secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor transactivationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron differentiationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to painSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
memorySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of serotonin secretionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cerebellar granule cell precursor proliferationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstrictionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sperm ejaculationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron differentiationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of organ growthSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
enteric nervous system developmentSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
brain morphogenesisSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of thalamus sizeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
conditioned place preferenceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell migration5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokine production5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalization5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophy5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
activation of phospholipase C activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intestine smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell division5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to temperature stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (113)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TFIIB-class transcription factor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coregulator bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TBP-class protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase regulator activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear estrogen receptor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear estrogen receptor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear glucocorticoid receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TBP-class protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Hsp90 protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen bindingSex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingSex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
non-membrane spanning protein tyrosine kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase activator activityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptor bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
tau protein bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
tau-protein kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
growth factor receptor bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
alpha2-adrenergic receptor activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epinephrine bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
actin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation channel activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin:sodium:chloride symporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
antiporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
syntaxin-1 bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cocaine bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activator activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (61)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
euchromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomeGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spindleGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionSex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeSex hormone-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
actin filamentTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
cell bodyTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear endoplasmic reticulumTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
glial cell projectionTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneTyrosine-protein kinase FynHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlycine receptor subunit betaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonergic synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (29)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID191532In vivo uterotrophic effect in estradiol stimulated immature rats1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 31, Issue:7
Nonisomerizable analogues of (Z)- and (E)-4-hydroxytamoxifen. Synthesis and endocrinological properties of substituted diphenylbenzocycloheptenes.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID191709Uterotrophic effect in rats at 50 ug/animal/day hydroxytamoxifen1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 25, Issue:9
Estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of monophenolic analogues of tamoxifen, (Z)-2-[p-(1,2-diphenyl-1-butenyl)phenoxy]-N, N-dimethylethylamine.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID318680Displacement of [3H]5alpha dihydrotestosterone from human sex hormone binding globulin2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 51, Issue:7
An updated steroid benchmark set and its application in the discovery of novel nanomolar ligands of sex hormone-binding globulin.
AID170810Anti-uterotrophic effect in rats at 50 ug/animal/day in the presence of 0.5 ug estradiol benzoate1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 25, Issue:9
Estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of monophenolic analogues of tamoxifen, (Z)-2-[p-(1,2-diphenyl-1-butenyl)phenoxy]-N, N-dimethylethylamine.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,009)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199098 (9.71)18.7374
1990's107 (10.60)18.2507
2000's420 (41.63)29.6817
2010's337 (33.40)24.3611
2020's47 (4.66)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 15.45

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be moderate demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index15.45 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.03 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.85 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index15.26 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (15.45)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials79 (7.52%)5.53%
Reviews6 (0.57%)6.00%
Case Studies4 (0.38%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other962 (91.53%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (251)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Programmation of GnRH Antagonist Cycles With Estradiol Valerate: Impact on the Stimulation in IVF/ICSI. [NCT01218386]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multiple-Site Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Equivalence of Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01% (Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA) to Estrace® Estradiol Vaginal Cream, USP, 0.01% (Warner Chilcott [NCT03294538]Phase 3663 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Completed
The Prognostic Accuracy of Within Cycle, Pre-embryo Transfer, Ultrasound Endometrial Patterns, to Predict Implantation During Assisted Reproduction [NCT03860636]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-11-26Recruiting
Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients Using Low-dose Pills in the Different Phases of Menacme [NCT01174524]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
The Impact of Different Hormone Therapy Regimens on Overactive Bladder Symptoms, Sexual Function, Depressive Symptoms, Autonomic Function, and Arterial Stiffness [NCT05280028]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-02-07Recruiting
An Open Randomized Two-Way Cross-Over Comparative Bioavailability Study to Compare the Extent of Systemic Absorption of Estradiol After a Single Dose Treatment With Two 25 mcg Estradiol Vaginal Tablet Formulations Administered in Postmenopausal Women With [NCT01085877]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Isolated and Associated Effects of Physical Exercise and Estrogen Therapy on Climactercs Women [NCT01120665]62 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Randomised Open-label Multi-centre Comparative Study to Evaluate Cycle Control of 2 Dosages of Estetrol Combined With Either P1 or P2, Compared to a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing E2V and DNG [NCT01221831]Phase 2396 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Effect of Vaginal Sildenafil Citrate on Endometrial Preparation and Outcome in Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles [NCT03854175]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-28Not yet recruiting
Multiple-dose Pharmacokinetic Study of Two Aqueous Suspensions of Estradiol and Progesterone Microspheres (1 mg/20 mg & 0.5 mg/15 mg) for Intramuscular Administration, in Postmenopausal Volunteers. [NCT01293747]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of the MK-8342B (Etonogestrel + 17β-Estradiol) Vaginal Ring and the Levonorgestrel-Ethinyl Estradiol (LNG-EE) 150/30 μg Combined Oral Contrac [NCT02616146]Phase 32,016 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by Sponsor as a result of a business decision to discontinue the development program for MK-8342B for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy.)
The Effect of Estrogen in the Prevention of Adhesion Reformation After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis [NCT03620929]Phase 4186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-13Enrolling by invitation
In Vivo Imaging of the Effect of Fulvestrant on the Availability of Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites in Metastatic Breast Tumor Lesions Using FES-PET [NCT01377324]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Studying The Effect of Estradiol Pretreatment on Follicular Synchronization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Outcome in Antagonist Cycles [NCT05197374]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-01Completed
Effects of Dienogest and Dienogest Plus Estradiol Valerate on Ovarian Reserve and Endometrioma Size [NCT03789123]Phase 4710 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Single Site, Open-label, Randomized, Two Treatments, Two Periods, Two Sequences, Crossover Single-dose Trial to Investigate the Bioequivalence of Two Oral Formulations of a Fixed-dose Combination Tablet Containing 1.5 mg Estradiol and 2.5 mg Nomegestrol A [NCT03749733]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Influences of Long Term Hormone Therapy on Physical Fitness and Vascular Function in Transgender Women [NCT06116201]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-15Completed
A Prospective Randomized Study of the Impact of Hormonal Monitoring and Progesterone Supplementation Adjustment on Outcome of Programmed Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles [NCT05189145]600 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
A Multi-Center,Randomized,Non-Inferiority and Positively Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dural Repair Patch in Neurosurgical Repairs [NCT02129114]132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
LIBERTY 2: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate [NCT03103087]Phase 3382 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-14Completed
Contraceptive Hormones and Women With Cystic Fibrosis: Satisfaction and Effects on Disease [NCT02144246]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Terminated
A Prospective Multicenter Non-interventional Study to Evaluate User Satisfaction With Estradiol Valerate/ Dienogest in Real Clinical Practice to be Conducted in Russia [NCT04901377]255 participants (Actual)Observational2021-06-24Completed
Hormonal Replacement Therapy Does Not Affect Self-estimated Pain or Experimental Pain Responses in Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Fibromyalgia: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01087593]29 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to ethical concerns regard to the results from the WHI study)
Treating Where it Hurts: A Randomized Blinded Clinical Trial of Local Estrogen to the Vulvar Vestibule for Dyspareunia in Postmenopausal Women [NCT03240081]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-20Completed
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women [NCT02691494]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-03Completed
Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in a Natural Versus Artificial Cycle: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03642665]Phase 4554 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-25Recruiting
Serum Estradiol Levels In Postmenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors and Vaginal Estrogen [NCT00984399]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Different Types of Progestin on Sleeping of Menopausal Women [NCT02086032]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
LIBERTY 1: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate [NCT03049735]Phase 3388 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-26Completed
Endometrial Estrogen Preparation Before Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer : Comparison of Vaginal and Transdermal Administration [NCT03518528]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2018-08-30Recruiting
A Study of Prevention and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Chinese Women [NCT00860964]Phase 4221 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol 0.4 mg/0.035 mg Chewable Tablets (Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA) Compared to FEMCON® Fe (Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol) 0.4 mg/0.035 mg Chewable Tablets (Warner Chilcott) in [NCT01344369]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Optimal Timing of Euploid Day 6 Blastocyst (Blastocyst Which Was Biopsied on Day 6 After Fertilization) Transfer in Frozen Hormonal Replacement Therapy Cycles: Day 6 or Day 7 of Progesterone Administration? [NCT05980091]Phase 1316 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-22Recruiting
Flow-mediated Evaluation of the Brachial Artery of Climacteric Women Using Estradiol Valerate and Placebo. Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study. [NCT02161614]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-8342B (ENG-E2 Vaginal Ring) in Women With Moderate to Severe Primary Dysmenorrhea (With Optional Extension) [NCT02668783]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-11Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by Sponsor as a result of a business decision to discontinue the development program for MK-8342B for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy.)
A Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Ovarian Follicular Activity and Hormone Levels With the Oral Contraceptive Regimen DR-102 Compared to Two 28-day Oral Contraceptive Regimens Containing Different Synthetic Progestins [NCT01291004]Phase 1206 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Effect of Low-dose Rhythmic 17-β-estradiol Administration on Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women [NCT05903820]Phase 448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-19Recruiting
The Effect of Tamoxifen on Endometrial Thickness and Pregnancy Outcome in Women With Thin Endometrium Undergoing Frozen Thawed Cycle. [NCT03060304]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-31Not yet recruiting
Characterisation of Relative Bioavailability and Assessment of Bioequivalence of a Newly Developed Ethinylestradiol/Dienogest IR Formulation in Comparison With a Marketed Reference Product (Valette®) [NCT01600274]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Clinical Pregnancy Rate for Frozen Embryo Transfer With Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT): a Pilot Study Comparing 1 Versus 2 Weeks of Treatment [NCT03930706]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
Concomitant Clomiphene Citrate and Estradiol Versus Clomiphene Citrate Alone in Ovulation Induction: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02186782]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
Imaging of ER Density to Guide and Improve Tailored Therapy for Acquired Anti-hormonal Resistant Breast Cancer [NCT01088477]21 participants (Actual)Observational2010-02-28Completed
Effect of Menopause Hormone Therapy In Postmenopausal Women With CeRebral Small Vessel DiseAse And Mild Cognitive DecLinE [NCT05982470]Phase 2328 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-18Not yet recruiting
Evaluating Quality Performance of Extemporaneously Compounded Estrogen Hormone Products [NCT05645406]Early Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-10Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Study to Analysis the Effectiveness of Estradiol Valerate Pretreatment in Antagonist Protocol for Poor Ovarian Response Patient [NCT03300518]552 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-15Completed
Trial of Vaginal Estrogen for Urogenital Symptom Relief in Women on Aromatase Inhibitors: Systemic Impact Versus Local Objective Benefits and Quality of Life [NCT02528383]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Timing of Estrogen Support During the Luteal Phase of IVF / Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01367912]301 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Single-center, Double-masked, Placebo-controlled Parallel-group Study of Pregnancy-related Hormones Estradiol and Medroxyprogesterone, in Conjunction With Hydrocortisone and Growth Hormone to Stimulate C-peptide Secretion in Women With T1DM [NCT01265017]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient funding)
Hormone Replacement Therapy Versus Minimal Ovarian Stimulation for Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in Non Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients [NCT02330757]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-10Recruiting
Prevention of Menstrual Migraines: Effects of Estrogen Add-back During the HFI in Patients Using Continuous Oral Contraceptives. [NCT01251263]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of the Dried Biological Amnion Graft Following Hysteroscopic Lysis for the Prevention of Postoperative Adhesions in Patients With Intrauterine Adhesions [NCT02496052]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Luteal Phase Support With Estradiol In Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization [NCT03788681]Phase 3170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Recruiting
Comparison Between Natural and Artificial Cycle in Recipient Oocyte Patients [NCT01353846]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-05-31Recruiting
PRE-GAIN Bone Health Pilot Study - Physiologic Replacement of EstroGen for Adolescent Females With AnorexIa Nervosa for Bone Health Pilot Study [NCT04021017]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-21Withdrawn(stopped due to PI Workload)
The Effect of Low Dose Estrogen on Cortical Function as a Function of Age in Postmenopausal Women. [NCT01268046]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study, to Demonstrate the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Treatment With USL-221 on Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms and Vulvar/Vaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Patients [NCT00727129]Phase 3495 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate Inhibition of Ovulation of Two Oral Estradiol / Drospirenone Regimens in Healthy Young Female Volunteers Over a Period of 3 Treatment Cycles [NCT00631124]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Tricilest (Norgestimate-ethinyl Estradiol) and Diane-35 (Cyproterone Acetate-ethinyl Estradiol) in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT00752635]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare the Effects on Bone Mineral Density of DR-105 and a 28-Day Cycle Oral Contraceptive Regimen in Healthy, Postmenarchal, Adolescent Females [NCT00924560]Phase 21,361 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Effect of 17ß-estradiol on Inflammatory-immune Responses in Post-menopausal Women According to Administration Route: Pilot Study [NCT00701337]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Bioavailability of a Formulation of Estradiol Valerate and Dienogest 2 mg/2 mg Coated Tablets With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT05332106]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-12Completed
Effect of Sildenafil on Uterine and Endometrial Vasculature in Women With Thin Endometrium Having Frozen-Thawed IVF Cycles [NCT04283435]Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Not yet recruiting
Sildenafil Citrate for Endometrial Preparation in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles [NCT02845388]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Prospective, Controlled, Single-blinded, Longitudinal, Two-arms, Clinical Study Evaluation of Efficacy/Safety of EVE-PMS Skin-Test Panel -Detecting Sensitivity to Sex Hormones in Women With Premenstrual Syndrome [NCT00866437]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Recruiting
Biomarkers, Breast Density And Risk Reduction Perspectives In BRCA Carriers [NCT00080756]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-11Active, not recruiting
Evaluation Des Performances de la Tomographie Par Emission de Positons Avec la 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol ([18F]-FES) Pour le Diagnostic de l'Endometriose [NCT02233621]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to not enough enrollement)
Comparison of Ultra-low-dose Oral Versus Trans-dermal Hormone Therapy on Coagulation Activation and Metabolic Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease [NCT02264743]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Disposable Balloon Uterine Stent Combined With Estrogen or Dried Biological Amnion Graft for the Therapy of Uterine Adhesion [NCT03346317]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-16Recruiting
Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles [NCT05112692]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women [NCT02654054]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-22Completed
Vaginal Estradiol Pretreatment in Labour Induction With Misoprostol [NCT02485821]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
The Effect of Estradiol Valerate With and Without Oral Sildenafil on Endometrial Thickness and Pregnancy Rates in Infertile Women: A R.C.T [NCT03301233]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
Clinical Efficacy of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Treating Perimenopausal Women With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction [NCT04962386]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-03-06Recruiting
To Evaluate the Effect of GnRH Agonist Administered in the Luteal Phase on ART Cycle Outcomes in Both GnRH Agonist and GnRH Antagonist Treated Ovarian Stimulation Protocols [NCT02114645]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Frozen Embryo Transfer in Natural and Hormonal Replacement Cycles: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02251925]Phase 3460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Recruiting
A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Way Crossover Pivotal Study to Assess the Bioequivalence of NGM/EE Tablets Manufactured at 2 Different Facilities [NCT02127593]Phase 1101 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Do Oral Contraceptives Protect Against Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes [NCT04899778]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-29Recruiting
Impact of Individualized Estrogen Therapy on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Parameters in Young Women After Bilateral Oophorectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03815929]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-15Completed
Duration of Estrogen for Luteal Phase in Pregnant Women Undergone Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles- Randomized Controlled Trials Phase III [NCT04013438]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
Periurethral vs Intravaginal Estrogen for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: TAPER (Techniques of APplying Vaginal Estrogen for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections) Trial [NCT05472779]Phase 2102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-03Recruiting
The Impact of Different Administration Routes of Hormonal Contraceptives on Androgen Synthesis, Glucose Metabolism and Inflammation. A Prospective Randomized Trial. [NCT01087879]45 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
The Influence of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Cerebral Serotonin-1A Receptor Distribution and Mood in Postmenopausal Women [NCT00755963]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Single Site, Placebo and Standard Care Controlled, Double Blind, Randomised Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Four Doses of Zesteem in Accelerating Early Wound Healing of Punch Biopsy Skin Wounds. [NCT00984386]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Open-label, Randomized, Cross-over Study to Investigate the Bioequivalence of Estradiol Valerate (EV) and Levomefolate Calcium After Single Oral Administration of a Tablet Formulation Containing 3 mg EV Without and With 0.451 mg Levomefolate Calcium and a [NCT01031355]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
The Role of Estrogen in the Neurobiology of Eating Disorders: A Study of Cognitive Flexibility and Reward in Eating Disorders [NCT03740204]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-13Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 2-arm Study to Show Superiority of the Oral Contraceptive SH T00658ID Over Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo on Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms After 6 Cycles of Treatment. [NCT00754065]Phase 3409 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Multi-center, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of SH T00658ID Compared to SH D593B in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea [NCT00909857]Phase 3507 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Cryopreserved-thawed Embryo Transfer in Down or Non-down Regulated Hormonally Controlled Cycles: a Prospective, Randomized Study [NCT02736032]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Drug-drug Interaction Study Between Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide and Feminizing Hormones in Trans Women Living With HIV [NCT05663892]Phase 445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-23Recruiting
The Influence of Estrogen on the Fear Extinction Network in Humans-R61 [NCT02673606]Phase 1136 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Evaluation of the Adhesion Quality and Primary Dermal Irritation Potential of an Alternate Second Generation Estradiol Transdermal Systems in Normal Healthy Female Volunteers [NCT00650442]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase III Investigator-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo- Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Equivalence and Safety of Estradiol Vaginal Tablets 10 mcg and Vagifem® (Estradiol Vaginal Tablets) 10 mcg (Novo Nordisk Inc.) A [NCT02668796]Phase 3522 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Oral Contraceptive Efficacy and Body Weight: Does Obesity Affect the Risk of Contraceptive Failure? [NCT00662454]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Endometrial Preparation Using Letrozole Compared to Artificial Cycle for Frozen Embryo Transfer in PCOS Patients [NCT04002635]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Practical issues)
Interactions Between Antiretrovirals and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills [NCT00829114]Phase 4370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Luteal Phase Estradiol Support for In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: a Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT02677259]Phase 2506 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Vascular Findings Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women Before and During Hormone Therapy: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Prospective Study [NCT00668603]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Therapeutic Targeting of ER Beta in Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT03941730]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-28Recruiting
A Multicenter, Retrospective, Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Suturable DuraGen™ [NCT04923867]260 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-04-28Recruiting
A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study to Examine MK-6913 for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women [NCT01015677]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-17Terminated
Continuous Versus Cyclic Postoperative Use of Low-Dose Combined Oral Contraceptive Belara® for the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Chronic Pelvic Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT00844012]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-05-31Not yet recruiting
Initiating Transdermal Estradiol Therapy in Turner's Syndrome [NCT00870220]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase II Randomized, Two-arms, Single-blind, Cross Controlled Study for Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of Diagnosis and Treatment of Premenstrual Syndrome by Detecting Skin Reactions Followed by Desensitization to Sex Hormones [NCT00873262]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Recruiting
The Effects of Oral vs. Intravaginal Hormonal Contraception on Vaginal Health [NCT00612508]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Bioavailability of a Formulation of Levonorgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol 15.0 mg/0.03 mg Coated Tablets With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT04230070]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-24Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized Study to Evaluate Bleeding Patterns in Women Using One of Three Different Doses of DR-1031 Oral Contraceptive Compared to Seasonale Oral Contraceptive Regimen [NCT00394771]Phase 2567 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Fed, Bioequivalence Study of Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate Tablets, 1 mg/0.5 mg Versus Activella® (1 mg Estradiol/0.5 mg Norethindrone Acetate) Tablets in Normal, Healthy, Post-Menopausal Female Subjects. [NCT01181726]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
The Effect of Metformin and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate on Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Wistar-Albino Rats With Induced Endometrial Hyperplasia [NCT02872818]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Descriptive Analysis of Serum Immunological Markers During an Euploid Frozen Embryo Transfer in a Natural Cycle (NC). [NCT05473273]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-04-24Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Hormone Patterns and Ovarian Follicular Activity With the Oral Contraceptive Regimen DR-1021 [NCT00544882]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Status of the Growth Hormone/ Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (GH/IGF-1) Axis in Relation to Growth Failure, Body Weight and Neuroprotection in Children With Ataxia Telangiectasia [NCT01052623]Phase 424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of Three Different Doses of a Formulation Composed of Crystalline Estradiol and Progesterone Microspheres, Indicated for Monthly IM Injection for the Treatment ot Climacteric Symptoms. [NCT00775242]Phase 2/Phase 3103 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, 7 Cycle Duration (196 Days), Phase 3 Study of Oral Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest Tablets for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding. [NCT00307801]Phase 3231 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Prospective Double Blind Evaluation of Bioidentical Hormones [NCT00302731]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated
PROMES: PROspective, Non-Interventional, Observational, Longitudinal Study to Describe the Safety Profile of MESIGYNA® (Norethisterone Enantate 50 mg and Estradiol Valerate 5 mg) as a Contraceptive Method for Women in Reproductive Age at the Outpatient Cl [NCT03901131]296 participants (Actual)Observational2019-08-26Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo- Controlled, 7 Cycle Duration (196 Days), Phase 3 Study of Oral Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest Tablets for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding. [NCT00293059]Phase 3190 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Study to Evaluate the Effects of Estrogen on Estrogen Receptor Biomarkers in Healthy Postmenopausal Women [NCT00799708]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Natural Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycles in Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF: a Pilot Study [NCT00843570]Phase 4159 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
An Open Label Study to Evaluate Cycle Control With Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo (Norgestimate/Ethinyl Estradiol) and Yaz (Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol) in Healthy Sexually Active Females [NCT00745901]Phase 4355 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Estrogen Dosing in Turner Syndrome:Pharmacology & Metabolism [NCT00837616]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Short-term Effects of Transdermal Estradiol on Female COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study [NCT05774405]Phase 29,169 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
A Double Blind, Randomized, Active-control Study to Evaluate Effects of Drospirenone/Estradiol (Angeliq) and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/Conjugated Equine Estrogen (Prempro) on Blood Pressure and Sodium Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Women With Prehyperten [NCT00420342]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Multisite Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study of Estradiol Plus Antipsychotic Versus Placebo Plus Antipsychotic in the Treatment of Psychotic Symptoms in Women With Schizophrenia [NCT00357006]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing a 2.2mg 17 Beta-Estradiol/0.69mg Levonorgestrel Combination Transdermal Patch, and a 1mg 17 Beta-Estradiol Transdermal Patch With a Placebo Patch in Postmenopausal Women to Determ [NCT00206622]Phase 4425 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
[NCT00204074]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-10-31Active, not recruiting
Substituted Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles With GnRH-agonist Supplementation [NCT01943812]Phase 4287 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multi-National Study to Demonstrate Efficacy of Continuous Combined 0.5 mg Estradiol and 2.5 mg Dydrogesterone in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women in Comparison to Placebo Over 3 M [NCT00251082]Phase 3391 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Randomized Trial Comparing Functional Digestive Outcomes Related to Two Types of Management of Rectal Endometriosis: Continuous Hormonal Treatment and Curative Surgery [NCT01973816]Phase 378 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-30Recruiting
A Relative Bioavailability Study of 3 mg/0.02 mg Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets Under Non-Fasting Conditions. [NCT01182207]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-labe, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combined Levonorgestrel(LNG) 100mcg and Ethinyl Estradiol(EE) 20mcg for Oral Contraception [NCT02021097]Phase 31,008 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Recruiting
[NCT00006133]970 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial to Evaluate Functional Imaging in Prediction of Response to Abemaciclib for Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [NCT06179303]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-06-01Not yet recruiting
A Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Fasting, Bioequivalence Study of Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate Tablets, 1 mg/0.5 mg Versus Activella® (1 mg Estradiol/0.5 mg Norethindrone Acetate) Tablets in Normal, Healthy, Post-Menopausal Female Subjects [NCT01157182]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
The Impact of HIV on Accelerated Aging in the Female Genital Tract: a Pilot Trial of Topical Estradiol to Improve the Vaginal Microbiome and Symptoms of Vaginal Atrophy in Menopausal Women With HIV [NCT04079218]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Active, not recruiting
Progesterone Amplifies Estrogen-stimulated Growth Hormone Secretion in Older Women [NCT02272647]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Relative Bioavailability Study of 0.4 mg/35 Mcg Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol Chewable Tablets Under Fasting Conditions [NCT01340625]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI) [NCT04590417]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of 304 Danish Girls With Tall Stature: Phenotypic Characteristics and Effects of Oral Administration of Natural 17β-Estradiol [NCT02638922]304 participants (Actual)Observational2014-01-31Active, not recruiting
Effects of Estradiol and Soy on Menopausal Symptoms [NCT00997893]Phase 296 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Relative Bioavailability Study of 3 mg/0.02 mg Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT01182194]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Effect of Combined Estradiol and Drospirenone Treatment Versus Combined Estradiol and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Treatment on Endothelial Function: A Crossover Study [NCT01109979]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Controlled, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy in Relief of Hot Flushes in Women Receiving Oral Estradiol Acetate Tablets, Oral Estradiol Tablets or Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens [NCT01070979]Phase 3249 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Fat Mediated Modulation of Reproductive and Endocrine Function in Young Athletes [NCT00946192]Phase 3121 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Programming by Estrogen Treatment in Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol [NCT01419353]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding the Estrogen Metabolism Enzymes and Effects of Hormone Therapy for Oral Low Dose or Not Oral on Variables Related Endothelial Function, Inflammation and Metabolic Profile in Patients in Recent Menopause Study Pharmacogeneti [NCT01432028]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Low Dose Vaginal Estrogens in the Treatment of Atrophic Vaginitis [NCT00816556]Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding)
Coagulation Activation and Fibrinolysis With Sublingual Versus Oral Versus Transdermal Estradiol in Transgender Women [NCT05387577]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-07Terminated(stopped due to per MCW IRB)
The Effects of Oral Contraceptive Pills vs Hormonal Patch on Coagulation Parameters [NCT00554632]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing the Effect of a Contraceptive Vaginal Ring Delivering Daily Doses of 150 Micrograms Nestorone and 15 Micrograms Ethinyl Estradiol to an Oral Contraceptive Containing 150 Micrograms of Levonorgestrel and 30 Microgra [NCT00213096]Phase 250 participants Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Bioavailability of a Formulation of Dienogest and Ethinyl Estradiol 2.0 mg/0.03 mg Coated Tablets With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT04193852]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-09Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Single Center, Cross-over Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety Following a Single Application of Three Different Doses 0.5 gm (0.5 mg Estradiol), 0.75 gm (0.75 mg Estradiol) and 1.25 gm (1.25 mg Estradiol [NCT03556800]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-22Recruiting
A Pharmacokinetic Randomized Study With a Parallel Group Design to Assess the Extent of Systemic Absorption of Estradiol During Treatment With a 10 µg or 25 µg Estradiol Vaginal Tablet Administered Once Daily for 2 Weeks Followed by 10 Weeks of Twice-Week [NCT01486979]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Interest of a Steroid Pre-treatment Prior to IVF Protocol With Ovarian Stimulation by Recombinant FSH and With LH Surge Blockage by Daily GnRH Antagonist [NCT01489852]Phase 4472 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Blinded Randomised Trial About the Influence of Estradiol Supplementation During the Luteal in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Treatment [NCT00490308]Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Not yet recruiting
Optimal Hormone Replacement for Women With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency [NCT02922348]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-01Withdrawn
Bioavailability of a Formulation of Levonorgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol 0.1 mg/0.02 mg Coated Tablets With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT04194905]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-21Completed
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) With 18F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) as a Predictor of Response in Patients With Breast Cancer Scheduled to be Treated With MK-2206 in Combination With Either an Aromatase Inhibitor or Fulvestrant on NCI Protocol 8762 [NCT01714128]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study Funding no longer available)
A Pilot Study Of Estradiol Followed By Exemestane For Post-Menopausal Hormone Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer After Prior Failed Endocrine Therapy: Reversing Endocrine Resistance [NCT01385280]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Single Dose, Three-way, Cross-over, Relative Bioavailability Study With 3 Oral Formulations for Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: 0.5 mg Estradiol + 0.1 mg Norethisterone Acetate, 0.5 mg Estradiol + 0.25 mg Norethisterone Acetate, and 1 [NCT01477632]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
The Effect of Exenatide on Single and Multiple Doses Oral Contraceptive Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Female Subjects [NCT00254800]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study Comparing 3 Continuous Oral Angeliq (Drospirenone 3 mg/17ß-estradiol 1 mg, Drospirenone 2 mg /17ß-estradiol 1 mg, Drospirenone 1 mg /17ß-estradiol 1 mg) Combinations and 17ß-estradiol (1 mg [NCT00102141]Phase 3750 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Continuation Rates, Side Effects and Acceptability of NuvaRing Versus OrthoEvra [NCT00269620]Phase 4500 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Effects of Tibolone Treatment on the Endometrium [NCT00294463]Phase 435 participants Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Continuous Versus Cyclic Use of an Oral Contraceptive Pills in Adolescents [NCT00326404]Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Recruiting
Hormone Replacement Therapy Versus Minimal Ovarian Stimulation for Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients [NCT02273791]126 participants (Actual)Observational2013-12-31Completed
Mechanisms of Skin Repair by Topical Estrogen in Vivo [NCT00113100]152 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Hormonal Replacement Therapy Plus Letrozole Incorporation Versus Letrozole Mild Ovarian Stimulation in Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT06181305]Phase 4210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-12Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Trial for the Evaluation of the Two-way Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PD) Interaction of Gender Affirming Exogenous Estrogen (With Testosterone Suppression) on TDF/FTC PrEP in Transgender Women (TGW) [NCT04760691]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Study:the Different Outcomes Between Natural Cycle and Hormon Replacement Cycle in FET [NCT01780558]600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Study of Duragen vs. Duraguard in Chiari Surgery [NCT00741858]Phase 334 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Improving Contraceptive Effectiveness in Obese Women [NCT01170390]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 17-Beta Estradiol 10 Micrograms and 25 Micrograms (Vagifem) Doses in Treatment of Estrogen Deficiency-Derived Atrophic Vaginitis [NCT00465192]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-08-31Completed
The Frequency and Management of Breakthrough Bleeding During Extended Therapy With the Transvaginal Contraceptive Ring [NCT00475553]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
16α-18F-fluor-17β-østradiol PET/CT Til Visualisering af østrogenreceptor-positive Levermetastaser Fra brystkræft [NCT04150731]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-23Completed
[NCT01511822]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Clinical Efficacy and Metabolic Impact of Two Different Dosages of Ethinyl-estradiol in Association With Drospirenone in Normal-weight Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized Study. [NCT01519401]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Alzheimer's Disease: Therapeutic Potential of Estrogen [NCT00066157]Phase 2/Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Estrogen Replacement in Hypogonadal Girls Treated With GH: Differential Effects of Mode of Estrogen Delivery [NCT00140998]Phase 316 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Effects of Estrogen Replacement on Atherosclerosis Progression in Recently Menopausal Women [NCT00154180]Phase 4728 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Six Month Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Ultra-low Dose Combinations With 0.5 mg Estradiol and 0.1 mg or 0.25 mg Norethisterone Acetate (Activelle Low Dose 0 [NCT00184795]Phase 3576 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-28Completed
Optimization of Management Tactics for Women With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency, Taking Into Account Their Clinical and Hormonal Profile [NCT05737329]Phase 1/Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Active, not recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of DuraGen Plus® Adhesion Barrier Matrix to Minimize Adhesions Following Lumbar Discectomy [NCT00387829]347 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor voluntarily terminated study)
A Phase II Study of Vaginal Testosterone Cream vs. the ESTRING for Vaginal Dryness or Decreased Libido in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Aromatase Inhibitors [NCT00698035]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Synthetic vs Natural Estrogen in Combined Oral Contraception- Effect on Insulin Sensitivity, Coagulation, Inflammation and Endometrium - a Comparison With a Progestin-only Preparation. [NCT02352090]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Completed
A Phase 3 Study Safety and Efficacy Study of the Combination Estradiol and Progesterone to Treat Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women With an Intact Uterus [NCT01942668]Phase 31,845 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-05Completed
Pro-Inflammatory Effects of Two Different Doses of 17 Beta Estradiol in Menopausal Women [NCT00236301]Phase 399 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Terminated(stopped due to terminated)
Bioavailability of Formulation Clormadinone/Ethinyl Estradiol Coated Tablets 2 mg/0.02 mg With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT04713904]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-16Completed
Study of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women Receiving Combination Raloxifene and Oral Estrogen [NCT00332553]Phase 2150 participants Interventional2002-02-28Completed
Endometrial Receptivity After GnRH Agonist Triggering From Final Oocyte Maturation [NCT01500863]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
[NCT01501448]Phase 4118 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Transdermal Estrogen (Gel) Versus Oral Estrogen for Endometrial Preparation in Down-regulated Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Cycles-An Open-label Multi Centric Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05802303]510 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
Multi-centre Clinical Trial on Hormone Replacement Treatment in China [NCT01698164]Phase 41,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Recruiting
Induction of Puberty With 17-Beta Estradiol in Girls With Turner Syndrome. An Open Randomized Trial [NCT01710696]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-07-23Completed
The Effects of Two Endometrium Preparation Protocols in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in Women With Irregular Cycles [NCT01780610]670 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
Oestradiol Pre-treatment in an Ultrashort Flare GnRH Agonist/GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF [NCT01798836]Phase 2/Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Obtained results were not good. Protocol was proved ineffective.)
Atherosclerosis, Immune Mediated Inflammation and Hypoestrogenemia in Young Women [NCT03018366]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
Identification of the Menstrual Cycle-Associated Factors That Modulate Circulating Lipid Levels in Premenopausal Women [NCT01546454]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
[NCT02770365]Phase 3695 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Estradiol Metered-Dose Transdermal Spray (MDTS) in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women [NCT01389102]Phase 3454 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Comparison of Pharmacokinetics of 17-Beta-Estradiol Via Oral Administration With Sublingual Placement Versus Oral Administration With Swallowing of 17-Beta-estradiol in Male-to-Female Transgender Patients [NCT05428215]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-29Terminated(stopped due to Inability to adequately recruit participants, need for additional study participants based on preliminary data collection)
Open Label, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of the Contraceptive Efficacy of Norethindrone Acetate (NA) and Ethinyl Estradiol (EE) [NCT00932321]Phase 3938 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phytoestrogens as an Alternative to Estradiol in Reversing the Antiestrogenic Effect of Clomid on Endometrium in Ovulation Induction in Cases of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome [NCT02352597]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
The Efficacy of 17Beta-Estradiol in Postpartum-Related Depressive Illness [NCT00059228]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-17Terminated
Sex Hormones and Orthostatic Tolerance [NCT01153581]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Comparison Between Testosterone and Estradiol Over the Homogenization of Follicular Cohort: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03238092]Phase 326 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-31Not yet recruiting
Effects of Estradiol on Neural Reward System and Depression in the Perimenopause [NCT02255175]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-01Completed
"The Effect of Pretreatment With Dydrogesterone Vs Combined Estradiol Valerate and Dydrogestrone on Clinical Pregnancy Outcome of ICSI in PCOS Patients" [NCT05300841]Early Phase 1500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Transgender Therapy on Hormone Receptors, Adipogenesis, Myogenesis and Inflammation [NCT04551144]4 participants (Actual)Observational2020-10-06Active, not recruiting
Effects of Oral and Non-oral Hormonal Therapy on Cardiovascular Risk and Body Composition Parameters in Postmenopausal Women [NCT04453332]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-09Recruiting
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multi-Site Study to Evaluate Therapeutic Equivalence of Estradiol Vaginal Cream, USP, 0.01% (Prasco LLC) to Estrace® Cream (Warner Chilcott) in Treatment of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy [NCT03332303]Phase 3540 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-26Completed
Pharmacodynamics of NPC-01( 1mg Norethisterone and 0.02mg Ethinyl Estradiol) and IKH-01( 1mg Norethisterone and 0.035mg Ethinyl Estradiol); Effect of NPC-01 and IKH-01 on Serum Concentrations of Estradiol, Progesterone, FSH and LH. [NCT01253824]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Postmarketing Study Of Lybrel In Relation To Venous Thromboembolism [NCT01297348]598,682 participants (Actual)Observational2007-07-31Completed
Oral Contraceptive Ethinyl Estradiol Dose Effect on Postpartum Depression and Sexual Functioning Scales [NCT02210702]Phase 433 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
The Effects of Estrogen Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Hypercalciuria and Low Bone Mass [NCT01928082]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-01Terminated(stopped due to The fellow conducting the recruitment and screening left the institution)
Acute Estradiol and Progesterone Therapy in Hospitalized Adults to Reduce Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Severity: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04865029]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-22Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment due to change of COVID 19 variant prevalence)
Protocol for Randomized Clinical Study Concerning Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) After Previous Radical Breast Cancer Treatment [NCT00003771]Phase 31,300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
Pilot Retrospective Study on the Effect of Testosterone Treatment on Clitoral Arteries' Hemodynamic Parameters. [NCT04336891]81 participants (Actual)Observational2019-03-20Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Outcome of Two Protocols Used to Prepare the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer [NCT04507022]Phase 4112 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-12Completed
SPIRIT 2: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain [NCT03204331]Phase 3623 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
Nanoparticulate Versus Micronized Steroids Delivery for Transdermal Hormone Replacement Therapy: Effects on Blood Pressure, Insulin and C-reactive Protein and in Postmenopausal Women [NCT02467673]Phase 2185 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Effects of Acute Estrogen Therapy on Bone Formation [NCT02349113]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
The Effect of an ASC-seeded Collagen Hydrogel on Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Rates Following Skull Base Surgery [NCT04503161]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator left institution)
Live Birth After Letrozole-stimulated Cycles Versus Hormone Replacement Treatment Cycles for the First Frozen Embryo Transfer in Women With PCOS: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05227391]1,078 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-16Recruiting
Ovulation and Follicular Development Associated With Mid Follicular Phase Initiation of Combined Hormonal Contraception Containing Estradiol Hemihydrate Compared to Ethinyl Estradiol [NCT03077555]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-21Completed
MsFLASH-03: Comparative Efficacy of Low-Dose Estradiol and the SNRI Venlafaxine XR for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms [NCT01418209]339 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TX-12-004-HR in Postmenopausal Women With Symptoms of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) [NCT02449902]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: Phenotype and Optimal Treatment [NCT03568708]Phase 319 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
Functional Study of the Hypothalamus in High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): a Comparative Study [NCT03043924]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-26Active, not recruiting
Comparative Study of the Effect on Acne With Norgestimate Containing Triphasic Oral Contraceptive and Biphasic Preparation Containing Desogestrel [NCT01466673]Phase 4201 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Phase 2a Proof Of Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Pre-Menopausal Women With Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Uterine Fibroids [NCT01441635]Phase 2271 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-08Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Partially-blinded, Phase IIb Dose-finding Study on Ovarian Function, Vaginal Bleeding Pattern, and Pharmacokinetics Associated With the Use of Combined Vaginal Rings Releasing 17β-estradiol Plus Three Different Doses of Either N [NCT01709318]Phase 2666 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-12Completed
Comparison of Transdermal and Oral Estrogens in Adolescents With Ovarian Failure [NCT01023178]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
The Effects of 17β-estradiol on Skeletal Muscle Mass Following Immobilization [NCT03069781]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Multi-center Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Kuntai Capsule Alone and in Combination With Hormones in the Treatment of Early-onset Hypoovarian Function [NCT05021094]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-22Recruiting
Effects of Anorexia Nervosa on Peak Bone Mass [NCT01301183]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Comparing SyntheCelTM Dura Replacement to Other Dura Replacements in Patients Requiring Dura Repair Following Cranial Surgery [NCT00859508]99 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Estrogen on Uterine Endometrium in Healthy Postmenopausal Women [NCT00820664]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Which do You Think is the Best Treatment Choice in Primary Dysmenorrhea? [NCT03124524]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-15Completed
Natural Cycle Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycle for a Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in PGT Patients: A Randomized Trial [NCT03976544]Phase 4522 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-25Recruiting
Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Disposable Balloon Uterine Stent Combined With Estrogen or Dried Biological Amnion Graft in the Prevention of Adhesion Reformation After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis [NCT03329898]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-31Recruiting
Effects of Adding Oestradiol Supplementation in Luteal Phase in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization/ Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (IVF/ICSI ) Long Agonist Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles [NCT03832894]Phase 32 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Recruiting
Efficacy Study Comparing 0.9 g and 1.25 g EstroGel® 0.03% Doses With Placebo in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms and Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy Associated With Menopause [NCT00160173]Phase 4221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-02Completed
A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Impact of DR-102 Compared to a 28-day Standard Oral Contraceptive Regimen, on Hemosatic Parameters in Healthy Women [NCT01388491]Phase 2293 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
The Association of Hormonal Intake and Demographic Factors With Breast Cancer Risk. An Egyptian Case-controlled Study [NCT05135013]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-16Not yet recruiting
Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Estrogen Therapy Combined With Disposable Balloon Uterine Stent and Dried Biological Amnion Graft in the Prevention of Adhesion Reformation After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis [NCT03351205]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-21Recruiting
Addressing Preference as a Patient-centered Outcome to Prevent Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (rUTI) in Post-menopausal Women: a Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05723601]Phase 424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
SPIRIT 1: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain [NCT03204318]Phase 3638 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-07Completed
The Effect of the Co-administration of Atazanavir (ATV) and Ritonavir (RTV) on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing Ethinyl Estradiol and Norgestimate in Healthy Female Subjects [NCT00357604]Phase 122 participants Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Endometrial Receptivity Profile in Patients With Endometrial Proliferation Defects [NCT02406690]1 participants (Actual)Observational2015-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Study of BHR-200 (0.36% Transdermal Estradiol Gel) for the Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression in Men With Advanced Androgen-Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02349386]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to recruit patients)
A Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids [NCT01817530]Phase 2571 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-08Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00059228 (2) [back to overview]Beck Depression Inventory
NCT00059228 (2) [back to overview]Beck Depression Inventory
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Successful Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Value From Baseline MBL to end-of Study MBL
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00293059 (54) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00302731 (4) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol
NCT00302731 (4) [back to overview]Endometrial Measurement
NCT00302731 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Without Change in Baseline and Follow up Bone Density
NCT00302731 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Without Change in Baseline and Follow up Mammograms
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Successful Treatment
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 84.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Value From Baseline Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) to end-of Study MBL
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84.
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84
NCT00307801 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment.
NCT00357006 (1) [back to overview]Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
NCT00387829 (2) [back to overview]Radiological, Pain, and Functional Outcome Assessments
NCT00387829 (2) [back to overview]Radiological, Pain, and Functional Outcome Assessments
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Days With Bleeding During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants With Bleeding and/or Spotting Days During the 7-day Withdrawal During Cycle 1 (Day 85-91)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Days With Bleeding and/or Spotting During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants Reporting Hormone-Related Symptoms During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Days With Bleeding and/or Spotting During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants With Bleeding and/or Spotting Days During the 7-day Withdrawal During Cycle 2 (Day 177-183)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants Reporting Hormone-Related Symptoms During the 7-day Withdrawal Cycle 2 (Day 177-183)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants Reporting Hormone-Related Symptoms During the 7-day Withdrawal Cycle 1 (Day 85-91)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Participants Reporting Hormone-Related Symptoms During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Number of Moderate to Heavy Bleeding Days During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Number of Moderate to Heavy Bleeding Days During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)
NCT00394771 (12) [back to overview]Days With Bleeding During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 112 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour SBP From the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Measurements in Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour SBP From the ABPM Measurements in Per Protocol Population
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour DBP From the ABPM Measurements
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 120 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Are Sodium Sensitive at Baseline and Week 8
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Office Cuff SBP and DBP at Trough
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Day Time, Mean Nighttime and Mean Trough SBP From the ABPM Measurements
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Day Time, Mean Nighttime and Mean Trough DBP From the ABPM Measurements
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 130 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 124 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)
NCT00420342 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 116 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Number of Days of Bleeding During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Change From Cycle 2 Days 1 - 20 to Cycle 2 Days 21 - 28 in Maximum Follicle Size
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Serum Inhibin-B Levels by Cycle Day
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels by Cycle Day
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Serum Estradiol Levels by Cycle Day
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bleeding or Spotting During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bleeding During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Follicles Greater Than 5 mm in Diameter
NCT00544882 (9) [back to overview]Number of Days of Bleeding or Spotting During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods
NCT00612508 (2) [back to overview]Thickness of the Vaginal Epithelium (in mm)With Means and Standard Deviations Reported.
NCT00612508 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Change in Vaginal Epithelium Scores
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Persistently Elevated Serum Estradiol Level Outside the Post-menopausal Range
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Total Testosterone Levels
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Sexual Satisfaction
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Sexual Quality of Life
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Serum Estradiol (E2)
NCT00698035 (7) [back to overview]Matched E2 by Commercial and Research (RIA) Analyses
NCT00741858 (1) [back to overview]Physical Health Quality of Life
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 2
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 3
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 2
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 3
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 1
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 3
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 2
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 3
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 1
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 2
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 1
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 3
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Overall Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Overall Number of Days of Total Blood Loss
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Overall Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 2
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Unscheduled Blood Loss Episodes
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction - Overall
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 1
NCT00745901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Intracyclic Bleeding Episode at Cycles 2 to 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Average of the Three Highest VAS Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 3 in the Average of the Three Highest VAS Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]The Change in Average of the 3 Highest Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]The Change of Pelvic Pain or Headache as Determined by the Highest Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Values During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Individual Hormone-related Symptoms During Cycle Days 1-21
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Individual Hormone-related Symptoms During the Hormone-free Interval Cycle Days 27 to 28 for EV/DNG and Cycle Days 22 to 28 for EE/NGM
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Other Hormone-related Symptoms During Cycle Days 22-28
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Individual Hormone-related Symptoms During Cycle Days 1-21
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Individual Hormone-related Symptoms During the Hormone-free Interval Cycle Days 27 to 28 for EV/DNG and Cycle Days 22 to 28 for EE/NGM
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in the Number of Days With at Least Moderate Pain/Intensity of Other Hormone-related Symptoms During Cycle Days 22-28
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Intracyclic Bleeding Episode at Cycles 2 to 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With no Increase in Rescue Medication and VAS Decrease During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 13
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 6
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Number of Ibuprofen Tablets Used as Rescue Medication
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in the Number of Ibuprofen Tablets Used as Rescue Medication
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Work
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Social Relationship
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - School/Course Work
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Physical Health
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Participant Feeling
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Leisure Time Activities
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Item Satisfaction
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Household Duties
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - General Activities
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Work
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Social Relationship
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - School/Course Work
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Physical Health
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Participant Feeling
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Leisure Time Activities
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Item Satisfaction
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Household Duties
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - General Activities
NCT00754065 (117) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4
NCT00799708 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Minor Gland Salivary Flow Rate After Treatment With 2 mg Estradiol vs Placebo at Day 7.
NCT00799708 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERbeta) -Specific Gene Signature After Treatment With 2 mg, 0.5 mg, or no Estradiol (Placebo) at Day 7
NCT00816556 (3) [back to overview]Change in Vulvovaginal Atrophy Questionnaire (VVAQ) Scores From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00816556 (3) [back to overview]Change in Serum Estrone (E1) Levels Between Baseline, 2 Weeks, and 12 Weeks
NCT00816556 (3) [back to overview]Change in Serum Estradiol (E2) Levels Between Baseline, 2 Weeks, and 12 Weeks
NCT00820664 (1) [back to overview]Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Proliferative Effects Measurement
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Lipids Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Serum Estrone Sulfate Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Change in Fat Free Mass From Baseline at 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Rates of Lipid Oxidation After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Changes in Insulin Growth Factor-I From Baseline at 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Change in Weight From Baseline at 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Change in Percent Fat Mass From Baseline in 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index From Baseline at 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Serum 17B Estradiol Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months
NCT00837616 (10) [back to overview]Serum Estrone Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months
NCT00859508 (1) [back to overview]Absence of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Fistula and Pseudomeningocele
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Vitality as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Participants With Improvement in Participants' Assessment in the Clinical Global Impression
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Participants With Improvement in the Investigators' Assessment in the Clinical Global Impression
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Cycle 2
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Screening
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Study Treatment
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Interference of Dysmenorrheic Pain With Work/School and Social or Other Activity (Entire Evaluation Period Used)
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Interference of Dysmenorrheic Pain With Work/School and Social or Other Activity (Only Bleeding Episodes Used Including the Two Days Before)
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Spotting Only Episodes
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Bleeding or Spotting Episodes
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Mean Length of Bleeding or Spotting Episodes
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Mean Length of Spotting Only Episodes
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Mental Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Mental Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting-only
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Episodes With Bleeding or Spotting
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Episodes With Spotting-only
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Role Physical as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]General Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]General Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting Only Episode
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding or Spotting Episode
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in the Sum of Score Points of Dysmenorrheic Pain
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in the Number of Days With Dysmenorrheic Pain
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Rescue Medication Use (Only Bleeding Episodes Used Including the Two Days Before the Episode)
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Rescue Medication Use (Entire Evaluation Period Used)
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Number of Days With Pelvic Pain Independent of Occurrence of Vaginal Bleeding
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Number of Days With Pelvic Pain During Unscheduled Bleeding
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Bodily Pain as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Bodily Pain as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Social Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Social Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Vitality as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Acupuncture Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Alternative Medicine Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Herbs/Teas Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Massages Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Medical Counseling Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Pain Medication Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Physiotherapy Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Own Costs of Vitamins Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 1
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 3
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Physical Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Physical Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Role Emotional as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Role Emotional as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Role Physical as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle
NCT00909857 (68) [back to overview]Other Own Costs Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Content (BMC)
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Deoxypyridinoline
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-terminal Propeptide
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Type I Collagen N-telopeptide
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Content (BMC)
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Months in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT00924560 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Content (BMC)
NCT00932321 (2) [back to overview]Pregnancy Rate (Expressed as Pearl Index) for Women 18 to 45 Years Old, MITT Population
NCT00932321 (2) [back to overview]Mean Number of Intracyclic Bleeding (IB)/Spotting Days in Cycles 2-6, MITT Population
NCT00946192 (2) [back to overview]Change in Total Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (Tibia)
NCT00946192 (2) [back to overview]Change in Lumbar Bone Mineral Density
NCT00997893 (5) [back to overview]Change in Verbal Memory, Delayed Recall
NCT00997893 (5) [back to overview]Change in STAI-6 Score
NCT00997893 (5) [back to overview]Change in Verbal Memory, Immediate Recall
NCT00997893 (5) [back to overview]Memory for Emotionally Valent Words and Neutral Words
NCT00997893 (5) [back to overview]Changes in STAI-6 Scores Before and After Psychosocial Stressor Over Time
NCT01015677 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level at Week 4
NCT01015677 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score (Combining Severe and Very Severe Score) at Week 4
NCT01015677 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Weekly Moderate to Very Severe Hot Flashes (Excluding Outliers) at Week 4
NCT01015677 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One or More Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01015677 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT01023178 (1) [back to overview]Estradiol
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 4, ITT Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT (Intention to Treat) Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 12, ITT Population
NCT01070979 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 8, ITT Population
NCT01109979 (1) [back to overview]Brachial Artery Reactivity % Flow Mediated Dilation (BAR %FMD)
NCT01153581 (3) [back to overview]Skin Microvascular Responses
NCT01153581 (3) [back to overview]Orthostatic Tolerance
NCT01153581 (3) [back to overview]Baroreceptor Function
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Norethindrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf for Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Corrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol.(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t for Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01157182 (21) [back to overview]Cmax for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01170390 (5) [back to overview]LNG AUC
NCT01170390 (5) [back to overview]LNG AUC
NCT01170390 (5) [back to overview]LNG Steady State at Baseline and Then Post-randomization
NCT01170390 (5) [back to overview]EE Steady State Baseline
NCT01170390 (5) [back to overview]EE Steady State After Randomization
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Corrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Norethindrone (Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01181726 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Drospirenone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01182194 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Drospirenone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01182207 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT01253824 (4) [back to overview]Comparing Estradiol AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))
NCT01253824 (4) [back to overview]Comparing FSH AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))
NCT01253824 (4) [back to overview]Comparing LH AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))
NCT01253824 (4) [back to overview]Comparing Progesterone AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))
NCT01268046 (1) [back to overview]Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Changes in Response to Estrogen and Aging - Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex (DLPFC)
NCT01297348 (2) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
NCT01297348 (2) [back to overview]Number of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Cases and Matched Controls
NCT01301183 (2) [back to overview]Change in Trabecular Number at the Ultradistal Radius Over a 12-month Period
NCT01301183 (2) [back to overview]Change in Bone Density Over a 12-month Period
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Norethindrone
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Norethindrone
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Norethindrone
NCT01340625 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-inf of Norethindrone
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Norethindrone
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol
NCT01344369 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Norethindrone
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Antithrombin
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)-Based Activated Protein-C (APC) Resistance
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Period in Protein S Total Antigen
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor II Activity
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Sex Hormone Binding Globulin
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Serum Random Total Cortisol
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 Levels
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Protein C Activity
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor VIII
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor VII
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Endogenous Thrombin Potential (EPT)-Based Activated Protein-C (APC) Resistance
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in D-Dimer
NCT01388491 (14) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin
NCT01389102 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change the Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms
NCT01389102 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in the Number of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Per Day
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Hot Flashes (Daily Vasomotor Symptom [VMS] Frequency) -- Week 8
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Bothersomeness of Hot Flashes -- Week 8
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Bothersomeness of Hot Flashes -- Week 4
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Hot Flashes (Vasomotor Symptom [VMS] Frequency) -- Week 4
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Perceived Hot Flash Interference (Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale; HFRDIS) -- Week 4
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Perceived Hot Flash Interference (Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale; HFRDIS) -- Week 8
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Hot Flashes -- Week 4
NCT01418209 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Hot Flashes -- Week 8
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Percentage of Days With Moderate to Very Heavy Bleeding
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding (Spotting Allowed) or Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No Change, Decrease From Baseline, or Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Uterine Bleeding or Moderate to Very Heavy Uterine Bleeding at Month 3
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Uterine Fibroids Daily Symptom Scale Scores
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QoL)
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Subject Surgery Intention Questionnaire (SSIQ) Version 2.0
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Physician Surgery Intention Questionnaire (PSIQ) Version 2.0
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MBL < 80 mL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MBL < 80 mL and With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in MBL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction in Volume of Largest Fibroid at Month 3 / Final Visit
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction in Uterine Volume at Month 3 / Final Visit
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to the Last 28 Days of Treatment in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Volume of the Largest Fibroid
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 28 Days of Treatment in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Uterine Volume
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Month 3
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in MBL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Uterine Bleeding Score
NCT01441635 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Percentage of Days With Any Uterine Bleeding
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 3
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 1
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Showing Treatment Response on the Investigator's Global Assessment at Month 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Categorical Score for Sebum Assessment at Month 1, 3 and 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Response at the End-of-Therapy by Participant's Self-Assessment at Month 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vaginal Blood Loss at Month 1, 3 and 6
NCT01466673 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Non-Compliant With Therapy
NCT01546454 (1) [back to overview]Total to HDL Cholesterol Ratio
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Intensity of Breakthrough Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 3
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progesterone Concentrations >16 Nmol/L, by Cycle
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ovulation Incidence, by Cycle
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 3
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Drug-Related Serious Adverse Event
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Absence of Withdrawal Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 2
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Serious Adverse Event
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Drug-Related Adverse Event
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Venous or Arterial Thrombotic/Thromboembolic Events
NCT01709318 (12) [back to overview]Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding During Cycle 2
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) Questionnaire
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Change in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01817530 (18) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 1 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 10 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 11 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 12 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 2 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 3 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 4 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 5 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 6 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 7 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 8 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 9 to 13
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From the 13th Cycle
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Primary Safety Endpoint: Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT01942668 (210) [back to overview]Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 - (MITT-VMS)
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Putamen Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Change in Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Dysphoria Scores
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Caudate Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Caudate Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Response Latency to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Response Latency to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Putamen Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.
NCT02255175 (9) [back to overview]Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 12
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reporting Thromboembolic Adverse Events
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 52/ End of Study
NCT02349386 (12) [back to overview]Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 24
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Matsuda Index- Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]D-dimer
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH)
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]F1+2
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Triglyceride
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Thrombin Generation, ETP Endogenous Thrombin Potential
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL)
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL)
NCT02352090 (11) [back to overview]Fasting Insulin
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Intermediate Cells)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Epithelial Integrity)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Parabasal Cells)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Secretions)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Color)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Superficial Cells)
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) Symptom
NCT02449902 (10) [back to overview]Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Vaginal pH
NCT02616146 (5) [back to overview]Number of In-Treatment Pregnancies Per 100 Woman-Years of Exposure in Participants 18-35 Years of Age (Pearl Index)
NCT02616146 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE
NCT02616146 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02616146 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Absence of Withdrawal Bleeding (AWB), by Cycle
NCT02616146 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting (BTB-S), by Cycle
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6
NCT02654054 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month
NCT02668783 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE
NCT02668783 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month
NCT02691494 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6
NCT02770365 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Identified as Responders
NCT02770365 (2) [back to overview]Most Bothersome Symptom
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline In Hemoglobin For Women With a Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Time To MBL Response
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In The PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In The PGA Questionnaire For Uterine Fibroid-related Function From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And Norethindrone (NET) In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), As Assessed By DXA
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Score By Health-Related Quality Of Life Total Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire
NCT03049735 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of Estradiol In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Hemoglobin For Women With A Hemoglobin Concentration ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4) As Assessed By DXA
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease in UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Score by Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in UFS-QoL Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And NET In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck As Assessed By DXA
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Function From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Time To MBL Response
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume
NCT03103087 (44) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume
NCT03240081 (2) [back to overview]Change in Median Dyspareunia Pain Scores After 4 Weeks Using Study Drug
NCT03240081 (2) [back to overview]Change in Median Pain Scores for Intercourse After 12 Weeks Using Study Drug
NCT03294538 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Identified as a Responder After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream and Estrace Vaginal Cream Groups
NCT03294538 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Identified as a Responder After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream, Estrace Vaginal Cream, and Vehicle Vaginal Cream Groups
NCT03294538 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Identified as Treatment Success After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream and Estrace Vaginal Cream Groups
NCT03294538 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Identified as Treatment Success After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream, Estrace Vaginal Cream, and Vehicle Vaginal Cream Groups
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Readmission
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Each Cause of Death
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events Occurrence
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Scores 1 or 2 on the 9-point World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale at Discharge, Measured up to Day 21
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Number of Days Death Occurred After Admission
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT04865029 (8) [back to overview]Grade 3 Adverse Events Occurrence

Beck Depression Inventory

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory for measuring the severity of depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The range of scores vary from 0 to 63 (highest possible total) for the whole test. A score of 0 - 10 indicates minimal depression, while a score of over 40 indicates extreme depression. No subscales were used for this outcome. (NCT00059228)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol15.84
Placebo5.3

[back to top]

Beck Depression Inventory

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory for measuring the severity of depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The range of scores vary from 0 to 63 (highest possible total) for the whole test. A score of 0 - 10 indicates minimal depression, while a score of over 40 indicates extreme depression. No subscales were used for this outcome. (NCT00059228)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol26
Placebo27.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined for the 90 days before treatment (ie, run-in phase) and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss while under treatment compared to before treatment. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-411.9
Placebo-152.3

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)206.1
Placebo194.7

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)67.1
Placebo147.4

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)47.5
Placebo116.9

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding

Excessive bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if (1) the blood loss volume associated with each episode was less than 80 mL and (2) the blood loss volume associated with each bleeding episode represented a decrease of at least 50% from the average of the qualifying bleeding episodes, where the qualifying bleeding episodes were those with a blood loss volume ≥ 80 mL (per episode) that occurred during the run-in phase. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.385
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding

Frequent bleeding was defined as greater than 5 bleeding episodes, with a minimum of 20 bleeding days overall in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no more than 4 bleeding episodes and the total number of bleeding days did not exceed 24 days and there was no increase in the total number of bleeding days in the efficacy phase as compared to the run-in phase. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.250
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding

Prolonged bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes, each lasting 8 or more days in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days and the decrease between the maximum duration during the run-in phase and the maximum duration during the efficacy phase was at least 2 days. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.154
Placebo0.083

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 196 (visit 11) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: from baseline up to treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.807
Placebo0.419

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.012
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Successful Treatment

End of Study menstrual blood loss (MBL) ≤ 80 mL and a decrease to a value of ≤ 50% of the Baseline MBL was considered as treatment success. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

,
InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
End of study MBL <=80 mLDecrease MBL >=50% of baseline MBLSuccessful treatment
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.5680.5680.511
Placebo0.1830.2170.133

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

Menstrual blood loss was determined using the alkaline hematin method for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss after treatment. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-353.1
Placebo-130.4

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 196 (visit 11) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: from baseline up to treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.812
Placebo0.383

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 196 is presented. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0052
Placebo0.0154

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 84 is presented. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.0035
Placebo-0.0024

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 196

Hematocrit was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hematocrit from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

InterventionPercentage of blood volume (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.30
Placebo0.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.57
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 84 (visit 7) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: from baseline up to treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.880
Placebo0.509

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 84. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.22
Placebo0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-2.0
Placebo-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-3.5
Placebo0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

The number of bleeding days was determine for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days while under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of bleeding days while under treatment compared to baseline. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Interventionbleeding days (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-5.2
Placebo-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

A bleeding episode was one that lasted for at least 2 days, and where the bleeding days were separated by no more than 1 bleeding-free day. An episode stopped with 2 consecutive bleeding-free days. The number of episodes was determined for the 90 days before treatment and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative values indicates a reduction from baseline in the number of episodes while under treatment. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Interventionbleeding episodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.5
Placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment

The number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90-day run-in phase before treatment (baseline) and the number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90 days while under treatment was determined. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of sanitary protection items used while under treatment compared to the number used before treatment. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionSanitary protection products (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-43.6
Placebo-21.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.7
Placebo1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.0
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.3
Placebo2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 84. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Placebo-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196

"The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 196 is presented." (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.07
Placebo-0.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84

"The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 84 is presented." (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: baseline and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-2.07
Placebo-0.26

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Value From Baseline MBL to end-of Study MBL

The MBL for each cycle includes intermenstrual bleeding in addition to withdrawal bleeding. Baseline MBL was the mean MBL of measured MBL during three cycles in the run-in Phase. One cycle was defined as 28 days. For this analysis, the run-in Phase was defined by the days 1 to 84 (= 3 cycles each of 28 days). End of Study MBL was measured during Cycle 7 of the Treatment Phase (data imputation and Last Observation Carried Forward was applied). (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-114.60
Placebo-49.944

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)136.5
Placebo146.9

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)59.9
Placebo139.6

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin methods after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)41.3
Placebo113.3

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 84 (visit 7) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: from baseline up to treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.835
Placebo0.426

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms

Up to 8 criteria had to be met for complete response during 90-day period. No bleeding episodes (BE) >7 days, no >4 BE, no BE with MBL >=80 mL, no >1 BE increase from baseline, no increase from baseline in an individual participant's total number of bleeding days and total number of bleeding days not >24 days. Additionally, for participants included with prolonged bleeding: decrease between maximum duration during run-in and efficacy >=2 days excessive bleeding: MBL associated with each episode decreased by >=50% from average of qualifying episodes during run-in. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.292
Placebo0.029

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.024
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.012
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.047
Placebo0.043

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.047
Placebo0.062

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if there was any change in employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.129
Placebo0.213

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.221
Placebo0.106

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked how many days and hours were missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

Interventiondays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked how many days and hours they missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

Interventionday (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.4
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to specify out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication, co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.241
Placebo0.314

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to specify if they had out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.323
Placebo0.407

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much DUB affected their productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.40
Placebo4.03

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much their DUB affected productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.38
Placebo3.07

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who had received such services is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.012
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who received such services is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.48
Placebo4.10

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do their regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing daily activities. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.81
Placebo3.91

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.012
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.012
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed. (NCT00293059)
Timeframe: treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.024
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol

To determine if bioidentical hormone replacement therapy is associated with change in lipid profiles (surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease) when compared to Prempro and provide safety data to proceed to larger trial. This was determined by evaluating lipid levels at baseline and during the 12-month treatment period. Participants' values were averaged at baseline and again at 12 months; the average of the baseline value was subtracted from the average at completion. (NCT00302731)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Study Arm 1221.5
Study Arm 2221.5
Study Arm 3223
Study Arm 4165.5

[back to top]

Endometrial Measurement

Baseline and 12 month follow up endovaginal ultrasound(completed at study site only) to evaluate endometrial stripe thickness for change on hormone therapy for all 4 arms. Endometrial thickness was measured in millimeters at baseline and again at 12 month completion. The average of the baseline value was subtracted from the average at completion for each group and reported in mm. Single participant in Arm 2: compared baseline to completion. (NCT00302731)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionmm (Mean)
Study Arm 113.0
Study Arm 210.0
Study Arm 32.5
Study Arm 43.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Without Change in Baseline and Follow up Bone Density

Comparison at baseline and month 12 by descriptive analysis of bone density. Assessing for changes in density related to hormone replacement therapy. Bone density readings for participants completing study in descriptive terms. Looking for significant change in bone density while on hormone therapy for 12 months. Those who had no change are counted below. (NCT00302731)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Arm 11
Study Arm 21
Study Arm 32
Study Arm 43

[back to top]

Number of Participants Without Change in Baseline and Follow up Mammograms

Comparison at baseline and month 12 by descriptive analysis of breast mammograms. Assessing for changes in density and/or lesions for risk of breast stimulation from hormone replacement therapy. Mammogram readings for participants completing study in descriptive terms. Looking for significant change in breast tissue while on hormone therapy for 12 months. Those who had no change are counted below. (NCT00302731)
Timeframe: baseline and month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Arm 12
Study Arm 21
Study Arm 32
Study Arm 44

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked to specify her out-of pocket expenses because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with no out-of pocket expenses are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.920
Placebo0.879

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked to specify her out-of pocket expenses because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with no out-of pocket expenses are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.855
Placebo0.881

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked if she had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and to specify the cost. The proportion of participants with such treatment are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.977
Placebo0.985

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked if she had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and to specify the cost. The proportion of participants with such treatment are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.966
Placebo0.954

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196.

The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her productivity while she was working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her work and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from working. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.8
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84.

The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her productivity while she was working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her work and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from working. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.0
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked if she received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and if yes, how many hours per week. The proportion of participants with such services are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked if she received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and if yes, how many hours per week. The proportion of participants with such services are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196.

The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her ability to do her regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her daily activities and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.0
Placebo3.2

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her ability to do her regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her daily activities and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.1
Placebo3.2

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with any unscheduled outpatient visits are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.008
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with any unscheduled outpatient visits are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.008
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with such visits are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.031
Placebo0.015

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with such visits are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.058
Placebo0.031

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Successful Treatment

End of Study menstrual blood loss (MBL) ≤ 80 mL and a decrease to a value of ≤ 50% of the Baseline MBL was considered as treatment success. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

,
InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
End of study MBL <=80 mLDecrease MBL >=50% of baseline MBLSuccessful treatment
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.7580.7880.720
Placebo0.1330.1330.107

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

"According to the patient´s global assessment scale improved was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and not improved was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Patients assessed the overall improvement at day 196 compared with admission to the study condition." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.779
Placebo0.451

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

A bleeding episode is characterized by the following: • Bleeding for at least 2 days • Bleeding days can be separated by no more than 1 bleeding-free day • An episode stops with 2 consecutive bleeding-free days. The number of episodes was determined for the 90 days before treatment and for the 90 days under treatment. negative value indicates a reduction from baseline in the number of episodes while under treatment. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionBleeding episodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.35
Placebo-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment

The number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and those used during the 90 days while under treatment was determined. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of sanitary protection items used while under treatment compared to baseline. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionSanitary protection products (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-38.4
Placebo-16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 196.

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum 132. The higher the score, the better the well-being of the patient. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-2.3
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 84.

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum 132. The higher the score, the better the well-being of the patient. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.2
Placebo2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196.

"The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Patients rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked your own health state today to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-3.00
Placebo2.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84.

"The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Patients rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked your own health state today to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.63
Placebo0.62

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Value From Baseline Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) to end-of Study MBL

The MBL for each cycle includes intermenstrual bleeding in addition to withdrawal bleeding. Baseline MBL was the mean MBL of measured MBL during three cycles in the run-in Phase. One cycle was defined as 28 days. For this analysis, the run-in Phase was defined by the days 1 to 84 (= 3 cycles each of 28 days). End of Study MBL was measured during Cycle 7 of the Treatment Phase (data imputation and Last Observation Carried Forward was applied). (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

InterventionmL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-169.94
Placebo4.628

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1

Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for one cycle. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)175.6
Placebo194.3

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3

Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for 3 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)68.3
Placebo195.1

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7

Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for 7 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 7 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)44.6
Placebo167.2

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1.

Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for one cycle. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)207.8
Placebo238.9

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3.

Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)72.1
Placebo188.4

[back to top]

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7.

Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Cycle 7 = 28 days (one cycle)

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)46.7
Placebo168.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding

Excessive bleeding:>=2 bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume (MBL) of >=80 mL in 90-day period, assessed by alkaline hematin method. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. Cure from excessive bleeding: MBL in each episode <80 mL + blood loss volume associated with each bleeding episode is decrease of ≥50% from average of qualifying bleeding episodes (with blood loss volume ≥80 mL per episode during run-in) (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.441
Placebo0.013

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

A bleeding day is a day on which sanitary protection is required. The number of bleeding days was determined for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days while under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of bleeding days while under treatment compared to baseline. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionBleeding days (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-5.13
Placebo-3.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 84

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the patients´sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum values are 19 and 133. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.2
Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 196

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the patients´sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum values are 19 and 133. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-4.9
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 84. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 84

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.36
Placebo0.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 196

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.70
Placebo0.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Treatment Day 196.

Hematocrit was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hematocrit from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 196

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.63
Placebo0.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Ferritin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in ferritin from baseline at treatment day 84. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.8
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Ferritin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in ferritin from baseline at treatment day 196. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)8.6
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 84

The health state classification of the EQ-5D comprises 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a score of .594. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.0041
Placebo0.0082

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days under treatment. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss after treatment. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-458.4
Placebo-93.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding

Prolonged bleeding: 2 or more bleeding episodes, each lasting 8 or more days. Cure from prolonged bleeding: no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days and the decrease between maximum duration during run-in and maximum duration during the efficacy phase was at least 2 days. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.350
Placebo0.100

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

"According to the investigator's global assessment scale improved was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and not improved was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and patient interview were used as sources for the assessment at day 196 compared with admission to study data." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.847
Placebo0.395

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

"According to the investigator's global assessment scale improved was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and not improved was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and patient interview were used as sources for the assessment at day 84 compared with admission to study data." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.838
Placebo0.394

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

"According to the patient's global assessment scale improved was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and not improved was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Patients assessed the overall improvement at day 84 compared with admission to the study condition." (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.724
Placebo0.529

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms

At least 6, up to 8 criteria to be met in complete response during 90-day period: no bleeding episodes(BE) >7 days, no >4 BE, no BE with blood loss (menstrual blood loss, MBL) ≥80 mL, no >1 BE increase from baseline, no increase from baseline in individual patient's total number of bleeding days and total number of bleeding days not >24 days. Additionally, for subjects included with prolonged bleeding: decrease between maximum duration during run-in and efficacy ≥2 days excessive bleeding: MBL associated with each episode decreased by ≥50% from average of qualifying episodes during run-in. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.295
Placebo0.012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 196

The health state classification of the EQ-5D comprises 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a score of .594. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.0191
Placebo0.0116

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196.

The patient was asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks and was asked to specify the number of hours per week. The proportion of participants with such changes are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.098
Placebo0.087

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84.

The patient was asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks and was asked to specify the number of hours per week. The proportion of participants with such changes are displayed. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.095
Placebo0.152

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196

The patient was asked how many days and hours she missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of her problems associated with her DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 196

Interventiondays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.13
Placebo0.52

[back to top]

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84

The patient was asked how many days and hours she missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of her problems associated with her DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Treatment day 84

Interventiondays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.14
Placebo0.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment.

Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) for the 90 days before treatment (ie, run-in phase) and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss while under treatment compared to before treatment. (NCT00307801)
Timeframe: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7

Interventionml (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-480.6
Placebo-94.2

[back to top]

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a well validated, standardized method of evaluating and monitoring psychotic symptoms. The PANSS assesses: positive (hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder), negative (blunted affect, abstract thinking and general symptomatology. The positive and negative subscale each consist of 7 items rated from 1(absent) - 7(extreme) with a minimum score = 7, maximum score = 49. The general subscale consists of 16 items with a minimum score = 16, maximum score = 112. A Total PANSS score (positive+ negative + general scores) has a minimum of 30 and maximum of 210. Higher scores represent more severity in symptoms. (NCT00357006)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (day 56)
Adjunctive 100 mcg Transdermal Estradiol19.1816.36
Adjunctive 200 mcg Transdermal Estradiol18.2414.11
Placebo18.1816.36

[back to top]

Radiological, Pain, and Functional Outcome Assessments

"Radiological score (MRI Outcome score): MRI peridural fibrosis in 5 consecutive 2-D axial Spin Echo T1 axial slices. Score consists of the ratio of total available space in each image and the amount of scar identified (percentage).~Pain (VAS): Visual Analog Score used to rate the subject's pain.VAS scale is a 100 mm horizontal line, where the far left side of the scale equals (0) no pain and the far right side of the scale (100) equals the worst possible pain.~Functional outcome score (ODI): Used to assess the effect leg or back pain on everyday life. Questions relate to areas such as walking, lifting, sitting, ability to travel as well as other common activities. Ten questions with scores from 0-5. Calculated as percentage: (Actual score /Maximum overall score (worst disability))*100." (NCT00387829)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionOutcome scores (Least Squares Mean)
MRI Outcome ScoreODI ScoreVAS Score
1- DuraGen Plus During Surgery12.3756.97414.010
2 - Surgery Alone12.5787.11816.696

[back to top]

Radiological, Pain, and Functional Outcome Assessments

"Radiological score (MRI Outcome score): MRI peridural fibrosis in 5 consecutive 2-D axial Spin Echo T1 axial slices. Score consists of the ratio of total available space in each image and the amount of scar identified (percentage).~Pain (VAS): Visual Analog Score used to rate the subject's pain.VAS scale is a 100 mm horizontal line, where the far left side of the scale equals (0) no pain and the far right side of the scale (100) equals the worst possible pain.~Functional outcome score (ODI): Used to assess the effect leg or back pain on everyday life. Questions relate to areas such as walking, lifting, sitting, ability to travel as well as other common activities. Ten questions with scores from 0-5. Calculated as percentage: (Actual score /Maximum overall score (worst disability))*100." (NCT00387829)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionOutcome scores (Least Squares Mean)
MRI Outcome ScoreODI ScoreVAS Score
1- DuraGen Plus During Surgery10.0466.04812.926
2 - Surgery Alone9.7886.89014.378

[back to top]

Days With Bleeding During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 1-84

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-10313.5
Midrange Dose DR-10312.5
High Dose DR-10314
Seasonale2

[back to top]

Participants With Bleeding and/or Spotting Days During the 7-day Withdrawal During Cycle 1 (Day 85-91)

Participants are categorized by the duration of bleeding that occurred during the scheduled 7-day withdrawal period for Cycle 1. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 85-91

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
0 day1-3 days4-7 days
High Dose DR-1031252754
Low Dose DR-1031143659
Midrange Dose DR-1031281763
Seasonale271875

[back to top]

Days With Bleeding and/or Spotting During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. Spotting does not require sanitary protection. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 1-84

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-103113
Midrange Dose DR-103113.5
High Dose DR-103115
Seasonale15

[back to top] [back to top]

Days With Bleeding and/or Spotting During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. Spotting does not require sanitary protection. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 92-176

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-10316
Midrange Dose DR-10317
High Dose DR-10315
Seasonale6

[back to top]

Participants With Bleeding and/or Spotting Days During the 7-day Withdrawal During Cycle 2 (Day 177-183)

Participants are categorized by the duration of bleeding that occurred during the scheduled 7-day withdrawal period for Cycle 2. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 177-183

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
0 day1-3 days4-7 days
High Dose DR-1031232645
Low Dose DR-1031153250
Midrange Dose DR-1031203244
Seasonale212460

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Moderate to Heavy Bleeding Days During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. Participants recorded in the diary days when they had bleeding, and whether they considered the bleeding to be light, moderate or heavy. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 92-176

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-10310
Midrange Dose DR-10310
High Dose DR-10310
Seasonale0

[back to top]

Number of Moderate to Heavy Bleeding Days During Active Cycle 1 (Day 1-84)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. Participants recorded in the diary days when they had bleeding, and whether they considered the bleeding to be light, moderate or heavy. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 1-84

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-10310
Midrange Dose DR-10310
High Dose DR-10310
Seasonale0

[back to top]

Days With Bleeding During Active Cycle 2 (Day 92-176)

Bleeding is defined as a flow heavy enough to require sanitary protection. (NCT00394771)
Timeframe: Day 92-176

Interventiondays (Median)
Low Dose DR-10311
Midrange Dose DR-10312
High Dose DR-10311
Seasonale2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 112 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)

Mean 24-hour ABPM SBP values were calculated in posthoc subgroup analyses for the following subgroups: Baseline mean 24-hour SBP from ABPM >112 mmHg, >116 mmHg, >120 mmHg, >124 mmHg, and >130 mmHg. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.9
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.9
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour SBP From the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Measurements in Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population

The mean change in 24-hr ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) from Baseline to Week 8 was calculated for the full analysis set. The change from baseline means was adjusted for center and baseline SBP. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.03
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-0.27
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)2.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour SBP From the ABPM Measurements in Per Protocol Population

The mean change in 24-hr ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) from Baseline to Week 8 was calculated for the per protocol (PP) population. The change from baseline means was adjusted for center and baseline SBP. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.08
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)0.06
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)2.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hour DBP From the ABPM Measurements

The mean change in 24-hr Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) from Baseline to Week 8 was calculated for the full analysis set. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.19
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-0.91
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)0.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 120 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)

Mean 24-hour ABPM SBP values were calculated in posthoc subgroup analyses for the following subgroups: Baseline mean 24-hour SBP from ABPM >112 mmHg, >116 mmHg, >120 mmHg, >124 mmHg, and >130 mmHg. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-2.6
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-3.7
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)1.1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Are Sodium Sensitive at Baseline and Week 8

Sodium sensitivity was defined as ≥ 10 mmHg drop in mean arterial pressure, calculated from the office cuff BP values from Day 1 to Day 3. The number of subjects shifting from sodium sensitive at Baseline to sodium resistant at Week 8 or sodium resistant at Baseline to sodium sensitive at Week 8 by treatment group was reported. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: 8 weeks plus 3 days

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 8
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)41
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)42
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Office Cuff SBP and DBP at Trough

Seated systolic and diastolic office cuff blood pressures were taken at each visit; the mean of three readings were used at each timepoint. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-5.25-1.34
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)-4.200.33
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-6.02-0.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Day Time, Mean Nighttime and Mean Trough SBP From the ABPM Measurements

Systolic blood pressure means were calculated during the intervals daytime (6 AM - 10 PM); nighttime (10 PM - 6 AM), and trough (mean of last 5 measurements in the 24-hour cycle) (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
mean daytimemean nighttimemean trough
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-2.081.57-1.91
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)1.533.97-1.51
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.061.64-1.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Day Time, Mean Nighttime and Mean Trough DBP From the ABPM Measurements

Diastolic blood pressure means were calculated during the intervals daytime (6 AM - 10 PM); nighttime (10 PM - 6 AM), and trough (mean of last 5 measurements in the 24-hour cycle) (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Median)
mean daytimemean nighttimemean trough
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.950.20-1.04
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)0.171.75-0.30
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-1.560.67-1.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 130 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)

Mean 24-hour ABPM SBP values were calculated in posthoc subgroup analyses for the following subgroups: Baseline mean 24-hour SBP from ABPM >112 mmHg, >116 mmHg, >120 mmHg, >124 mmHg, and >130 mmHg. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-5.2
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-4.0
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 124 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)

Mean 24-hour ABPM SBP values were calculated in posthoc subgroup analyses for the following subgroups: Baseline mean 24-hour SBP from ABPM >112 mmHg, >116 mmHg, >120 mmHg, >124 mmHg, and >130 mmHg. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-3.4
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-4.4
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean 24-hours ABPM SBP Values, Baseline Mean > 116 mmHg (Posthoc Analysis)

Mean 24-hour ABPM SBP values were calculated in posthoc subgroup analyses for the following subgroups: Baseline mean 24-hour SBP from ABPM >112 mmHg, >116 mmHg, >120 mmHg, >124 mmHg, and >130 mmHg. (NCT00420342)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
0.5mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-2.4
2.0mg DRSP / 1.0mg E2 (Angeliq, BAY86-4891)-2.2
1.5 mg MPA / 0.3 mg CEE (Prempro)2.0

[back to top]

Number of Days of Bleeding During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods

The total number of days of unscheduled (Day 1 to Day 21 of each cycle) and scheduled (ie,withdrawal [Day 22 to Day 28 of each cycle]) bleeding (not including spotting) was derived from participant diaries. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Days 1-21, Cycle 2, Days 22-28 and Cycle 3, Days 1-21

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Cycle 2 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)Cycle 2 - Scheduled (Day 22-28)Cycle 3 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)
DR-10210.702.300.70
Mircette0.522.630.71

[back to top]

Change From Cycle 2 Days 1 - 20 to Cycle 2 Days 21 - 28 in Maximum Follicle Size

The change in the size of the largest documented follicle during combination therapy (Days 1 to 21) and during monotherapy/placebo (Days 21-28) measured by trans-vaginal ultrasound. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Days 1-20 and Cycle 2, Days 21-28

Interventionmm (Mean)
DR-1021-2.02
Mircette-1.79

[back to top]

Serum Inhibin-B Levels by Cycle Day

Levels of inhibin-B were measured throughout the study from blood samples. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 2 (Baseline), and Days 4, 6, 19-20, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, Cycle 3, Days 2, 4 and 6.

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 2 - Day 2 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 4 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 6 (n=28, 27)Cycle 2 - Days 19-20 (n=26, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 23 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 24 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 25 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 27 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 28 (n=26, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 2 (n=27, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 4 (n=27, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 6 (n=24, 26)
DR-102192.3042.8046.3523.1528.1036.8035.2039.6041.9554.7051.1036.15
Mircette99.0064.4541.2028.8532.1555.0062.3049.2055.0557.9552.2529.55

[back to top]

Serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels by Cycle Day

Levels of follicle stimulating hormone were measured throughout the study from blood samples. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 2 (Baseline), and Days 4, 6, 19-20, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, Cycle 3, Days 2, 4 and 6.

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
Cycle 2 - Day 2 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 4 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 6 (n=28, 27)Cycle 2 - Days 19-20 (n=26, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 23 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 24 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 25 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 27 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 28 (n=26, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 2 (n=27, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 4 (n=27, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 6 (n=24, 26)
DR-10214.003.553.701.452.702.802.903.705.054.903.702.50
Mircette4.003.703.501.552.353.703.903.904.704.053.602.50

[back to top]

Serum Estradiol Levels by Cycle Day

Levels of estradiol were measured throughout the study from blood samples. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 2 (Baseline), and Days 4, 6, 19-20, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, Cycle 3, Days 2, 4 and 6.

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 2 - Day 2 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 4 (n=28, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 6 (n=27, 27)Cycle 2 - Days 19-20 (n=26, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 23 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 24 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 25 (n=27, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 27 (n=25, 28)Cycle 2 - Day 28 (n=26, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 2 (n=27, 28)Cycle 3 - Day 4 (n=27, 27)Cycle 3 - Day 6 (n=24, 26)
DR-102147.0062.5043.0019.0024.0025.0024.0030.0036.0034.0066.0028.50
Mircette51.5034.5029.0020.5019.0026.5026.0020.0027.5043.0027.0032.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bleeding or Spotting During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods

The percentage of participants with unscheduled (Day 1 to Day 21 of each cycle) and scheduled (ie,withdrawal [Day 22 to Day 28 of each cycle]) bleeding or spotting was derived from participant diaries. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Days 1-21, Cycle 2, Days 22-28 and Cycle 3, Days 1-21

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 2 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)Cycle 2 - Scheduled (Day 22-28)Cycle 3 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)
DR-102148.177.855.6
Mircette59.392.653.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bleeding During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods

The percentage of participants with unscheduled (Day 1 to Day 21 of each cycle) and scheduled (ie,withdrawal [Day 22 to Day 28 of each cycle]) bleeding (not including spotting) was derived from participant diaries. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Days 1-21, Cycle 2, Days 22-28 and Cycle 3, Days 1-21

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 2 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)Cycle 2 - Scheduled (Day 22-28)Cycle 3 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)
DR-102118.577.829.6
Mircette33.377.825.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Follicles Greater Than 5 mm in Diameter

Ovarian follicles were measured by trans-vaginal ultrasound. The size of the 3 largest follicles was documented for each participant, and the percentage of follicles greater than 5 mm in diameter was calculated based on the total number follicles present (indicated by n for each time point). (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 11, 19-20, 23, 25, 27, Cycle 2, Days 4, 11, 19-20, 23, 25, 27, Cycle 3, Day 4.

,
Interventionpercentage of follicles (Number)
Cycle 1 - Day 11 (n=63, 48)Cycle 1 - Day 19-20 (n= 47, 94)Cycle 1 - Day 23 (n= 30, 76)Cycle 1 - Day 25 (n= 85, 106)Cycle 1 - Day 27 (n=135, 145)Cycle 2 - Day 4 (n=154, 156)Cycle 2 - Day 11 (n=76, 54)Cycle 2 - Days 19-20 (n=143, 148)Cycle 2 - Day 23 (n=91, 62)Cycle 2 - Day 25 (n=69, 80)Cycle 2 - Day 27 (n=94, 132)Cycle 3 - Day 4 (n=138, 117)
DR-102130.229.850.032.929.635.127.617.524.230.423.425.4
Mircette29.227.726.331.135.231.431.518.924.218.820.527.4

[back to top]

Number of Days of Bleeding or Spotting During Unscheduled and Scheduled Study Periods

The total number of days of unscheduled (Day 1 to Day 21 of each cycle) and scheduled (ie,withdrawal [Day 22 to Day 28 of each cycle]) bleeding or spotting was derived from participant diaries. (NCT00544882)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Days 1-21, Cycle 2, Days 22-28 and Cycle 3, Days 1-21

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Cycle 2 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)Cycle 2 - Scheduled (Day 22-28)Cycle 3 - Unscheduled (Day 1-21)
DR-10212.193.191.96
Mircette1.413.671.64

[back to top]

Thickness of the Vaginal Epithelium (in mm)With Means and Standard Deviations Reported.

Histologic evalation of vaginal sections was performed to measured and record the absolute thickness of the vaginal epithelium. Baseline findings were compared to biopsies after three and six cycles of treatment. Mean values were compared using T-test for paired data for baseline and 84 days, and baseline and 168 days (NCT00612508)
Timeframe: baseline, 84 days, 168 days

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
mean difference at 84 daysmean difference at 168 days
Desogen0.01-0.02
NuvaRing-0.005.007

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Self-reported treatment-related and serious adverse events (NCT00612508)
Timeframe: over 168 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Oral Contraceptive1
Intravaginal Ring Contraceptive0

[back to top]

Change in Vaginal Epithelium Scores

During a gynecologic exam, the vaginal epithelium was assessed by an examiner using the Vaginal Atrophy Scoring Scale to evaluate Rugae (lack of), Pallor (pinkness), Petechiae, Mucosal thinning, Dryness. Scores range from 0 (none) to 3 (severe); higher scores indicate less favorable outcomes. (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
RugaePallorPetechiaeMucosal thinningDryness
Estring-1.03-0.88-1.0-0.62-1.03
Testosterone Cream-0.71-0.91-0.74-0.88-0.71

[back to top]

Persistently Elevated Serum Estradiol Level Outside the Post-menopausal Range

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Quest Diagnostics). Persistently elevated serum estradiol level outside the post-menopausal range was defined as: Serum estradiol >10 pg/dl on two consecutive collections at least 4 weeks apart. 2. If baseline estradiol was >10 pg/dl, subsequent levels >10 pg/ml higher than baseline were considered a significant elevation outside the post-menopausal range. (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Estring0
Testosterone Cream4

[back to top]

Total Testosterone Levels

By serum ultrasensitive total testosterone test (Quest Diagnostics) (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionng/dl (Mean)
Testosterone at baselineTestosterone at 4 weeksTestosterone at 12 weeks
Testosterone Cream33186171

[back to top]

Sexual Satisfaction

"Participants were asked to respond to a Sexual Satisfaction One Item Measure which asked Overall, how satisfactory to you is your sexual relationship with your partner? Response options range from 1 (Extremely unsatisfactory) to 6 (Extremely satisfactory)." (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SS (BL)SS (W4)SS (W12)
Estring2.53.54.0
Testosterone Cream3.23.74.0

[back to top]

Sexual Quality of Life

Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) Sexual Dysfunction (SD) and Sexual Interest (SI) Subscales range from 0 to 4 and measure the severity of problems, with higher scores indicating more difficulty. (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SI (BL)SI (W4)SI (W12)SD (BL)SD (W4)SD (W12)
Estring1.21.30.92.92.42.0
Testosterone Cream1.41.21.02.92.11.9

[back to top]

Serum Estradiol (E2)

serial measurements of serum estradiol (E2) by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Quest Diagnostics) (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
E2 at baselineE2 at 4 weeksE2 at 12 weeks
Estring2759
Testosterone Cream9108

[back to top]

Matched E2 by Commercial and Research (RIA) Analyses

Serum estradiol assays sent to the UCSF clinical laboratory are sent out to Quest Diagnostics, which uses LC/MS for their ultra-sensitive estradiol assay. Samples were also sent to a specialized research lab in England which has developed an ultrasensitive assay using radioimmunoassay (RIA) after ether extraction (sensitivity limit of 3pmol/l) to quantify low levels of estradiol found in post-menopausal women (NCT00698035)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline E24-week E2
E2 by LC/MS17.77.8
E2 by RIA17.92.9

[back to top]

Physical Health Quality of Life

Physical health quality of life (based on SF-36 results) (SF-36 includes 8 scores scaled 0-100; lower score indicating more disability) (NCT00741858)
Timeframe: 7 years

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DuraGen (Sutureless)31.4
DuraGuard (Suturable)35.61

[back to top]

Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 2

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 2. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (day 29 to Day 56)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE5.3
DRSP/20mcg EE4.6

[back to top]

Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 3

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 3. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 (Day 57 to Day 84)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE4.6
DRSP/20mcg EE3.6

[back to top]

Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 2

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 2. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (Day 29 to 49 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 29 to 52 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE1.3
DRSP/20mcg EE1.9

[back to top]

Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 3

Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 3. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 (Day 57 to 77 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 57 to 80 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE1.4
DRSP/20mcg EE2.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 1

Breakthrough bleeding/spotting is any bleeding or spotting during active pills excluding days contiguous with withdrawal bleeding or continual withdrawal bleeding. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Day 8 to 21 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 8 to 24 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE53
DRSP/20mcg EE56

[back to top]

Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 3

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 3. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Scheduled bleeding was defined as any bleeding that occurred while not taking active hormones, regardless of the duration of regimen. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 (Day 78 to 84 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 81 to 84 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE3.1
DRSP/20mcg EE1.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 2

Breakthrough bleeding/spotting is any bleeding or spotting during active pills excluding days contiguous with withdrawal bleeding or continual withdrawal bleeding. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (Day 29 to 49 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 29 to 52 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE39
DRSP/20mcg EE62

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting Cycle 3

Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 (Day 57 to 77 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 57 to 80 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE47
DRSP/20mcg EE74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 1

Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Day 8 to 21 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 8 to 24 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE72
DRSP/20mcg EE74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 2

Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (Day 29 to 49 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 29 to 52 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE57
DRSP/20mcg EE87

[back to top]

Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 1

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 1. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Scheduled bleeding was defined as any bleeding that occurred while not taking active hormones, regardless of the duration of regimen. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Day 22 to 32 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 25 to 32 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE4.3
DRSP/20mcg EE3.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unscheduled Bleeding Cycle 3

Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 (Day 57 to 77 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 57 to 80 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NGM/25mcg EE65
DRSP/20mcg EE94

[back to top]

Overall Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss

summary of the overall number of days of scheduled blood loss. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Scheduled bleeding was defined as any bleeding that occurred while not taking active hormones, regardless of the duration of regimen. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to Cycle 3 (Day 8 to Day 84)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE11.2
DRSP/20mcg EE7.0

[back to top]

Overall Number of Days of Total Blood Loss

cycle control between treatment groups, overall. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to 3 (Day 8 to Day 84)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE15.8
DRSP/20mcg EE13.2

[back to top]

Overall Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss

cycle control between treatment groups, for three 28-day cycles. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to Cycle 3 (Day 8 to Day 80)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE4.6
DRSP/20mcg EE6.1

[back to top]

Number of Days of Scheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 2

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 2. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Scheduled bleeding was defined as any bleeding that occurred while not taking active hormones, regardless of the duration of regimen. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (Day 50 to 60 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 53 to 60 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE4.0
DRSP/20mcg EE2.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Unscheduled Blood Loss Episodes

Unscheduled blood loss episodes are bounded on both sides by at least 1 non- bleeding day. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to Cycle 3 (Day 8 to Day 80)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
0 Episode1 Episode2 Episodes3 Episodes4 Episodes5 Episodes6 Episodes8 Episodes9 Episodes
DRSP/20mcg EE29415022118231
NGM/25mcg EE55462321137000

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction - Overall

patient satisfaction based on 5 questions during three 28-day cycles - Question 1 (Overall Satisfaction). On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1=Very satisfied and 5=Very dissatisfied. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to Cycle 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of responses1. Very Satisfied2. Somewhat satisfied3. Neither satisfied or dissatisfied4. Dissatisfied5. Very dissatisfied
DRSP/20mcg EE16211532681
NGM/25mcg EE159993512112

[back to top]

Number of Days of Unscheduled Blood Loss - Cycle 1

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 1. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. Unscheduled bleeding is any bleeding during active pills except days 1-4 of cycle 2 or 3 if contiguous with withdrawal bleeding and days 1-7 of the first cycle. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Day 8 to 21 for NGM/25mcg EE and day 8 to 24 for DRSP/20mcg EE)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE1.9
DRSP/20mcg EE2.0

[back to top]

Number of Days of Total Blood Loss - Cycle 1

cycle control between treatment groups, cycle 1. Cycle control includes number of days of blood loss, incidence of blood loss, number of blood loss episodes, and blood loss flow intensity. (NCT00745901)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Day 8 to Day 28)

InterventionDays (Mean)
NGM/25mcg EE6.2
DRSP/20mcg EE5.2

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.5
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.1

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.5
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Intracyclic Bleeding Episode at Cycles 2 to 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Cycles 2 to 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
YesNo
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)53.846.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo40.559.5

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.1

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.8

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.2

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.2

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.0

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.2

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Average of the Three Highest VAS Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28

Subject self-assessed pelvic pain or headache per visual analog scale (VAS) values during the menstrual/withdrawal bleeding episode and Baseline. The VAS consists of a 100 mm long straight line, with verbal anchors at either end, representing a continuum of pain intensity. Accordingly, the scale ranges from 0 mm (absence of pain) to 100 mm (unbearable pain), and the change ranges from -100 mm (best) to 100 mm (worst). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Days 22-28 from Baseline to Days 22-28 from Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)45.89
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo39.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Cycle 3 in the Average of the Three Highest VAS Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28

Subject self-assessed pelvic pain or headache per visual analog scale (VAS) values during the menstrual/withdrawal bleeding episode and Baseline. The VAS consists of a 100 mm long straight line, with verbal anchors at either end, representing a continuum of pain intensity. Accordingly, the scale ranges from 0 mm (absence of pain) to 100 mm (unbearable pain), and the change ranges from -100 mm (best) to 100 mm (worst). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Days 22-28 from Baseline to Days 22-28 from Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)36.92
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo32.28

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.1

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.5

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.1

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.8

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.5

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.7

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.6

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.9
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.2

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.0

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.5

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.8

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.7

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.0

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (Episode is a set of days with intracyclic bleeding) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.2

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.2

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.0

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)7.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo9.0

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo7.5

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo7.4

[back to top]

Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.75
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.44

[back to top]

Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.77
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.10

[back to top]

Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (Episode is a set of days with bleeding/spotting) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.7

[back to top]

Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (Episode is a set of days with bleeding/spotting) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.4

[back to top]

Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (Episode is a set of days with bleeding/spotting) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.3

[back to top]

Number of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (Episode is a set of days with bleeding/spotting) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.7

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)19.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo23.7

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo18.8

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)14.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo19.1

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)12.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo19.4

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)9.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo8.6

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.4

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.3

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting-only in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.6

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.5
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.5

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.5
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.4

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.7

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.9
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo1.1

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (Episode is a set of days with intracyclic bleeding) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (Episode is a set of days with intracyclic bleeding) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (Episode is a set of days with intracyclic bleeding) (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.2

[back to top]

Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.5

[back to top]

Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.5

[back to top]

Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.3

[back to top]

Number of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.6
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.2

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Onset was defined as the number of days between progestogen withdrawal and the first day of the withdrawal bleeding episode (ie, starting on or after Day 25 for EV/DNG and on or after Day 22 for EE/NGM). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.0

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Onset was defined as the number of days between progestogen withdrawal and the first day of the withdrawal bleeding episode (ie, starting on or after Day 25 for EV/DNG and on or after Day 22 for EE/NGM). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.1

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Onset was defined as the number of days between progestogen withdrawal and the first day of the withdrawal bleeding episode (ie, starting on or after Day 25 for EV/DNG and on or after Day 22 for EE/NGM). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.3

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Onset was defined as the number of days between progestogen withdrawal and the first day of the withdrawal bleeding episode (ie, starting on or after Day 25 for EV/DNG and on or after Day 22 for EE/NGM). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.1

[back to top]

The Change in Average of the 3 Highest Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Values of the Hormone Withdrawal-associated Symptoms Pelvic Pain or Headache During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6

Subject self-assessed pelvic pain or headache per visual analog scale (VAS) values during the menstrual/withdrawal bleeding episode and Baseline. The VAS consists of a 100 mm long straight line, with verbal anchors at either end, representing a continuum of pain intensity. Accordingly, the scale ranges from 0 mm (absence of pain) to 100 mm (unbearable pain), and the change ranges from -100 mm (best) to 100 mm (worst). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Day 22-28 from Baseline to Day 22-28 from Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)43.05
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo34.97

[back to top]

The Change of Pelvic Pain or Headache as Determined by the Highest Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Values During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6

Subject self-assessed pelvic pain or headache per visual analog scale (VAS) values during the menstrual/withdrawal bleeding episode and Baseline. The VAS consists of a 100 mm long straight line, with verbal anchors at either end, representing a continuum of pain intensity. Accordingly, the scale ranges from 0 mm (absence of pain) to 100 mm (unbearable pain), and the change ranges from -100 mm (best) to 100 mm (worst). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Days 22-28 from Baseline to Days 22-28 from Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)43.60
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo34.55

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in PGWBI Questionnaire's assessment of participant's overall sense of well-being or distress. The PGWBI includes 22 items that, apart from combining into a global overall score, are divided into 6 dimensions: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality. The response format used a 6-grade Likert scale and the change in the normalized PGWBI global score as well as all the sub-domains score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Global scoreAnxietyDepressed moodPositive well-beingSelf-controlGeneral healthVitality
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.14-1.2-0.650.60-0.490.860.28
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo-0.18-0.8-0.980.38-0.161.35-0.51

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in PGWBI Questionnaire's assessment of participant's overall sense of well-being or distress. The PGWBI includes 22 items that, apart from combining into a global overall score, are divided into 6 dimensions: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality. The response format used a 6-grade Likert scale and the change in the normalized PGWBI global score as well as all the sub-domains score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Global scoreAnxietyDepressed moodPositive well-beingSelf-controlGeneral healthVitality
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.410.30.1849.660.6981.81-0.17
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo1.102.8-1.0450.290.1281.120.19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)46.223.115.415.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo50.018.818.812.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)31.652.610.55.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo57.10.028.614.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)47.123.520.68.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo57.715.423.13.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. Intensity was scored as 1=none, 2=spotting, 3=light, 4=normal, or 5=heavy. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)44.425.918.511.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo61.33.219.416.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
without withdrawal bleedingwith withdrawal bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)25.075.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo12.887.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 13

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
without withdrawal bleedingwith withdrawal bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)58.241.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo19.180.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
without withdrawal bleedingwith withdrawal bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)21.079.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo7.792.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With / Without Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 6

Withdrawal bleeding is bleeding that occurs when using oral contraceptives (OCs) caused by falling levels and/or taking away external source of estrogen and progestogen toward cycle end. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
without withdrawal bleedingwith withdrawal bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)17.782.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo8.391.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Intracyclic Bleeding Episode at Cycles 2 to 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Cycles 2 to 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
YesNo
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)62.038.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo49.750.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 13

CGI is used to collect information regarding the subject's total clinical experience. The assessment scale ranges from 0 to 7: (0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse). The scale of 1, 2, and 3 were categorized as improvement. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improved
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)37.932.315.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo20.326.627.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 6

CGI is used to collect information regarding the subject's total clinical experience. The assessment scale ranges from 0 to 7: (0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse). The scale of 1, 2, and 3 were categorized as improvement. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improved
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)21.141.527.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo20.025.233.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 13

In 1 section of the CGI the subject rates their total improvement and rate of satisfaction with sexuality during treatment. The assessment scale ranges from 0 to 7: (0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse). The scale of 1, 2, and 3 were categorized as improvement. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improved
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)33.935.516.9
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo17.225.028.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Assessment in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Cycle 6

In 1 section of the CGI the subject rates their total improvement and rate of satisfaction with sexuality during treatment. The assessment scale ranges from 0 to 7: (0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse). The scale of 1, 2, and 3 were categorized as improvement. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improved
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)25.232.729.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo11.630.332.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With no Increase in Rescue Medication and VAS Decrease During Cycle Days 22 to 28 From Baseline to Cycle 6

Rescue medication was standardized intake of 200 mg Ibuprofen tablets. Baseline: 7 days (Day 22) before first menstrual bleeding to Day 28. Treatment: 7 days (Day 22) before withdrawal bleeding of 6th cycle to Day 28 before the same cycle. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a subject-assessed measure of pelvic pain or headache consisting of a 100 mm long straight line, with verbal anchors at either end, representing a continuum of pain intensity. Accordingly, the scale ranges from 0 mm (absence of pain) to 100 mm (unbearable pain), and the change ranges from -100 mm (best) to 100 mm (worst). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Day 22-28 from Baseline to Day 22-28 from Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
15 mm VAS decrease30 mm VAS decrease45 mm VAS decrease25% VAS decrease50% VAS decrease75% VAS decreaseHalf-SD decrease
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)68.158.138.267.056.038.270.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo54.442.626.054.442.225.559.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 1 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
with absence of intracyclic bleedingwithout absence of intracyclic bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)78.321.7
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo91.58.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 13

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
with absence of intracyclic bleedingwithout absence of intracyclic bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)82.717.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo93.66.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 3 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
with absence of intracyclic bleedingwithout absence of intracyclic bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)79.620.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo85.714.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 6

Intracyclic bleeding is any unexpected bleeding episode occurring in cyclical treatment regimens. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: At Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
with absence of intracyclic bleedingwithout absence of intracyclic bleeding
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)81.618.4
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo80.319.7

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in the Number of Ibuprofen Tablets Used as Rescue Medication

Rescue medication use was standardized intake of 200 mg Ibuprofen tablets. Baseline period: 7 days (Day 22) before the first menstrual bleeding until Day 28 (normalized to a standard 28-day cycle). Treatment period: 7 days (Day 22) before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 13th treatment cycle until Day 28 before the same cycle (normalized to a standard 28-day cycle). Number of tablets taken by each subject, and then the Mean and standard deviation ((SD) derived. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionTablets (Mean)
Days 1-21Days 22-28
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-2.3-5.3
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo-3.5-5.2

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in the Number of Ibuprofen Tablets Used as Rescue Medication

Rescue medication use was standardized intake of 200 mg Ibuprofen tablets. Baseline period: 7 days (Day 22) before the first menstrual bleeding until Day 28 (normalized to a standard 28-day cycle). Treatment period: 7 days (Day 22) before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 6th treatment cycle until Day 28 of the same cycle (normalized to a standard 28-day cycle). Number of tablets taken by each subject, and then the Mean and standard deviation (SD) derived. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

,
InterventionTablets (Mean)
Days 1-21Days 22-28
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.6-5.8
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo-3.0-4.6

[back to top]

Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 3

Reference Period 3 is defined as Day 181 to Day 270 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 181 to Day 270

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.70
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.85

[back to top]

Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.64
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.53

[back to top]

Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.25
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.65

[back to top]

Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.46
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.71

[back to top]

Mean Length of Bleeding / Spotting Episodes in Reference Period 1

Reference Period 1 is defined as Day 1 to Day 90 during study treatment and includes the initial bleeding episode that triggered the first intake of study medication, meaning that the first treatment cycle includes 2 bleeding episodes. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.82
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo6.20

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Work

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (work - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 13 items with a scale of 1-5 [very poor, poor, fair, good, very good]). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.54
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.08

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Social Relationship

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (social relationship - 11 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.30
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.41

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - School/Course Work

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (school / course work - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 10 items with a scale of 1-5 (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.18
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo5.13

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Physical Health

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (physical health - 13 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.13
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.44

[back to top]

Mean Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 2

Reference Period 2 is defined as Day 91 to Day 180 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 91 to Day 180

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.74
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.77

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Participant Feeling

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (participant feeling - 14 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.12
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.19

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (overall life satisfaction and contentment). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Leisure Time Activities

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (leisure time activities - 6 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.22
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.77

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Item Satisfaction

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (item satisfaction). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Household Duties

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (household duties - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 10 items with a scale of 1-5 [very poor, poor, fair, good, very good]). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.50
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo3.08

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - General Activities

Change from Baseline to Cycle 6 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (general activities - 16 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 6 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.56
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo1.27

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Work

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (work - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 13 items with a scale of 1-5 [very poor, poor, fair, good, very good]). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.38
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo-1.71

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Social Relationship

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (social relationship - 11 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.01
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo1.75

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - School/Course Work

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (school / course work - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 10 items with a scale of 1-5 (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-1.97
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo4.39

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Physical Health

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (physical health - 13 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.93
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.13

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Participant Feeling

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (participant feeling - 14 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.44
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.39

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (overall life satisfaction and contentment). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.1
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Leisure Time Activities

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (leisure time activities - 6 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)2.72
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.37

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Item Satisfaction

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (item satisfaction). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.0
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo0.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - Household Duties

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (household duties - yes or no; if yes, then 4 choices, and 10 items with a scale of 1-5 [very poor, poor, fair, good, very good]). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-0.66
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.83

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Cycle 13 in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) - General Activities

Change from Baseline to Cycle 13 in the overall enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week as scored on the Q-LES-Q (general activities - 16 items). 1-5 scale (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good). The normalized score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The change in the normalized score ranges from -100 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 13 (28 days per Cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.73
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo1.34

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Spotting-only Episodes in Reference Period 4

Reference Period 4 is defined as Day 271 to Day 360 during study treatment. (NCT00754065)
Timeframe: From Day 271 to Day 360

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.2
Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Minor Gland Salivary Flow Rate After Treatment With 2 mg Estradiol vs Placebo at Day 7.

Change from baseline in unstimulated labial gland saliva flow rate at Day 7 (NCT00799708)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 7

InterventionμL/min (Least Squares Mean)
17β-estradiol 2.0 Milligrams-0.26
Placebo-0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERbeta) -Specific Gene Signature After Treatment With 2 mg, 0.5 mg, or no Estradiol (Placebo) at Day 7

Subset of genes on the log ratio intensity scale from a microarray platform - signature was pre-specified from an internally conducted study in knock-out mice treated with estrogens- quantified as a ratio of up regulated versus down regulated genes (NCT00799708)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 7

InterventionFold change (Least Squares Mean)
17β-estradiol 2.0 Milligrams0.028
17β-estradiol 0.5 Milligrams-0.011
Placebo0.080

[back to top]

Change in Vulvovaginal Atrophy Questionnaire (VVAQ) Scores From Baseline to Week 12

The VVAQ consists of three questions asking the participant to rate the severity and how bothersome each of the symptoms of atrophic vaginitis are (dryness, itching, and burning). It is graded 0 through 10. A higher number indicates less severe and less bothersomeness of the symptom, that is, 0= very severe or bothersome, 10= least severe or bothersome. (NCT00816556)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dryness SeverityDryness BothersomenessItching SeverityItching BothersomenessBurning SeverityBurning Bothersomeness
Estradiol2.02.12.62.61.51.5
Estriol3.22.31.41.32.11.9
Placebo2.73.61.91.71.01.1

[back to top]

Change in Serum Estrone (E1) Levels Between Baseline, 2 Weeks, and 12 Weeks

(NCT00816556)
Timeframe: baseline, 2 weeks, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline vs. Week 2Baseline vs. Week 12Week 2 vs. Week 12
Estradiol-1.61.21.5
Estriol-0.91.02.2
Placebo0.51.10.6

[back to top]

Change in Serum Estradiol (E2) Levels Between Baseline, 2 Weeks, and 12 Weeks

(NCT00816556)
Timeframe: baseline, 2 weeks, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline vs. Week 2Baseline vs. Week 12Week 2 vs. Week 12
Estradiol-1.70.61.9
Estriol0.0-0.4-0.3
Placebo0.50.2-0.3

[back to top]

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Proliferative Effects Measurement

Ratio of the total number of positively stained cell nuclei to the total number of cell nuclei. Proliferating endometrial cells express the Ki-67 antigen. The ratio was converted to a percent proliferating cells by taking the number of Ki-67 positive stained nuclei in a given field and dividing by the total number of nuclei in that field and multiplying by 100. At least 5 high power fields were scored in this manner and an aggregate percent Ki-67 positive cells was reported. Square root transformation was taken to make it approximately normally distributed for an ANOVA model to apply. (NCT00820664)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionSquare root of % positive stained cells (Least Squares Mean)
17β-estradiol 2.0 Milligrams0.73
17β-estradiol 0.5 Milligrams0.43
Placebo0.25

[back to top]

Lipids Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Total CholesterolLow Density LipoproteinHigh Density LipoproteinTriglycerides
Oral Estradiol168935695
Transdermal Estradiol153885070

[back to top]

Serum Estrone Sulfate Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Oral Estradiol63638
Transdermal Estradiol1875

[back to top]

Change in Fat Free Mass From Baseline at 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Oral Estradiol1.03
Transdermal Estradiol1.67

[back to top]

Rates of Lipid Oxidation After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionKcal/Fat Free Mass/day (Mean)
Oral Estradiol10
Transdermal Estradiol7.3

[back to top]

Changes in Insulin Growth Factor-I From Baseline at 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Oral Estradiol-16
Transdermal Estradiol28

[back to top]

Change in Weight From Baseline at 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Oral Estradiol1.1
Transdermal Estradiol1.9

[back to top]

Change in Percent Fat Mass From Baseline in 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercent fat mass (Mean)
Oral Estradiol-0.14
Transdermal Estradiol-0.64

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index From Baseline at 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Oral Estradiol0.075
Transdermal Estradiol0.65

[back to top]

Serum 17B Estradiol Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Oral Estradiol124
Transdermal Estradiol74

[back to top]

Serum Estrone Concentrations After Using Oral Versus Transdermal 17B Estradiol Replacement for 12 Months

(NCT00837616)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Oral Estradiol504
Transdermal Estradiol43

[back to top]

Absence of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Fistula and Pseudomeningocele

The primary endpoint for measuring effectiveness is such that an individual patient's treatment success requires the absence of CSF fistula (drainage from wound or sinus) and pseudomeningocele within 6 months post-operatively confirmed by radiographic evaluation and physical examination of the surgical site. (NCT00859508)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SyntheCel57
Other FDA Cleared Dura Replacements33

[back to top]

Vitality as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)68.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)67.2

[back to top]

Participants With Improvement in Participants' Assessment in the Clinical Global Impression

The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is a widely used rating scale/assessment instrument in psychopharmacology research in general, and in studies on women's health in particular. Participants were asked to rate their improvement during the course of the study. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 2 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MissingNot assessedVery much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worse
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)116091471850
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)014675572443

[back to top]

Participants With Improvement in the Investigators' Assessment in the Clinical Global Impression

The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is a widely used rating scale/assessment instrument in psychopharmacology research in general, and in studies on women's health in particular. Investigators were asked to rate the participants' improvement during the course of the study. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 2 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MissingNot assessedVery much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worse
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)016387491760
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)014284542336

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Baseline Cycle

The investigator was asked to interview the participant and record the number of missed hours/days from work due to dysmenorrheic pain in the previous menstrual cycle. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At Baseline (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MissingNever4 working hours1 working day>= 2 working days
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.047.913.220.917.9
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.051.711.723.912.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Cycle 2

The investigator was asked to interview the participant and record the number of missed hours/days from work due to dysmenorrheic pain in the previous menstrual cycle. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 2 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MissingNever4 working hours1 working day>= 2 working days
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.078.68.56.42.1
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.072.66.58.74.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Final Examination

The investigator was asked to interview the participant and record the number of missed hours/days from work due to dysmenorrheic pain in the previous menstrual cycle. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MissingNever4 working hours1 working day>= 2 working days
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.485.95.63.01.7
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.085.22.64.81.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Missing Time From Work Due to Dysmenorrheic Pain at Screening

The investigator was asked to interview the participant and record the number of missed hours/days from work due to dysmenorrheic pain in the previous menstrual cycle. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (28 days)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MissingNever4 working hours1 working day>= 2 working days
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.438.016.226.518.8
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.040.416.129.613.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Study Treatment

Participants were asked to express the degree of their satisfaction with study treatment. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From cycle 1 to cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MissingVery satisfiedSaatisfiedNeither satisfied nor dissatisfiedDissatisfiedVery dissatisfied
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.953.432.17.32.10.4
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)1.350.430.08.33.50.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Interference of Dysmenorrheic Pain With Work/School and Social or Other Activity (Entire Evaluation Period Used)

Interference of dysmenorrheic pain with work/school and social or other activity was assessed (yes/no). Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Baseline period-daily activities impairedBaseline period- leisure activities impairedTreatment period-daily activities impairedTreatment period- leisure activities impaired
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)93.292.354.752.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)92.290.060.061.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Interference of Dysmenorrheic Pain With Work/School and Social or Other Activity (Only Bleeding Episodes Used Including the Two Days Before)

Interference of dysmenorrheic pain with work/school and social or other activity was assessed (yes/no). Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline period-daily activities impairedBaseline period- leisure activities impairedTreatment period-daily activities impairedTreatment period- leisure activities impaired
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)92.390.651.747.9
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)91.389.656.556.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. Intensity could be described as spotting, light, normal or heavy. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)53.530.29.37.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)62.210.813.513.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Maximum Intensity of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. Intensity could be described as spotting, light, normal or heavy. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SpottingLightNormalHeavy
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)45.527.313.613.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)30.421.730.417.4

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Spotting Only Episodes

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.9
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)3.6

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Bleeding or Spotting Episodes

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)7.1
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)8.4

[back to top]

Mean Length of Bleeding or Spotting Episodes

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.17
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)5.83

[back to top]

Mean Length of Spotting Only Episodes

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.29
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)3.26

[back to top]

Mental Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)73.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)72.6

[back to top]

Mental Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)77.3
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)76.4

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding or Spotting

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)20.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)23.6

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting-only

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)7.3
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)7.6

[back to top]

Number of Episodes With Bleeding or Spotting

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.9
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.1

[back to top]

Number of Episodes With Spotting-only

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.5
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.4

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. The total number of days during intracyclic bleeding episodes was counted. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)1.0

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Days at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. The total number of days during intracyclic bleeding episodes was counted. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.6

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.2

[back to top]

Number of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionEpisodes (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.1
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.1

[back to top]

Role Physical as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)89.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)87.9

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. Intensity was defined as: 1 = none, 2 = spotting, 3 = light, 4 = normal, 5 = heavy. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.7
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.1

[back to top]

Maximum Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. Intensity was defined as: 1 = none, 2 = spotting, 3 = light, 4 = normal, 5 = heavy. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.7
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.0

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.5
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)5.2

[back to top]

Length of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)5.4

[back to top]

General Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)77.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)76.5

[back to top]

General Health as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)75.8
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)72.7

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Spotting Only Episode

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)1.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.7

[back to top]

Difference in Duration Between Longest and Shortest Bleeding or Spotting Episode

Bleeding/spotting episodes (day[s] with bleeding/spotting preceded and followed by at least 2 bleeding/spotting-free days) were described using the reference period (RP) method (length of RP: 90 days) recommended by the World Health Organization. 1st RP started on the 1st day of study medication. The total number of days during bleeding or spotting episodes was counted. Spotting = less than associated with normal menstruation relative to the subject's experience with no need for sanitary protection (except for panty liners). Bleeding = any bleeding of greater intensity than spotting. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 90

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.6

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in the Sum of Score Points of Dysmenorrheic Pain

Dysmenorrheic pain: pelvic pain during menstrual/withdrawal bleeding (WB) episode and 2 days before. Scores per day: 0 No pain; 1 Mild pain with no need for painkiller; 2 Moderate pain with need for painkiller; 3 Severe pain with need for painkiller. Baseline period: 2 days before 1st menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before WB of 1st treatment cycle until 3rd day before WB of the cycle after 2nd treatment cycle (normalized to standard 56-day period). Score difference min -168 (best), max 168 (worst) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-10.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)-10.0

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in the Number of Days With Dysmenorrheic Pain

Dysmenorrheic pain was defined as pelvic pain during the menstrual/withdrawal bleeding episode and the 2 days before this episode. Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-4.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)-4.2

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Rescue Medication Use (Only Bleeding Episodes Used Including the Two Days Before the Episode)

Rescue medication use was standardized intake of 200 mg Ibuprofen tablets. Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionTablets (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-6.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)-6.6

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Rescue Medication Use (Entire Evaluation Period Used)

Rescue medication use was standardized intake of 200 mg Ibuprofen tablets. Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionTablets (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-4.5
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)-5.6

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Number of Days With Pelvic Pain Independent of Occurrence of Vaginal Bleeding

Baseline period: 2 days before the first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before the 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before the withdrawal bleeding (WB) of the 1st evaluable treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd evaluable treatment cycle (normalized to a standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)-4.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)-3.7

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)6.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)6.2

[back to top]

Change Between Baseline Evaluation Period and Treatment Evaluation Period in Number of Days With Pelvic Pain During Unscheduled Bleeding

Evaluated was the number of days with bleeding-associated pelvic pain, excluding days during withdrawal bleeding (WB) and the 2 days preceding such WB, and during administration deviation bleeding and the 2 days preceding such bleeding (normalized to a standard 56-day period). Baseline period: 2 days before first menstrual bleeding until 3rd day before 3rd menstrual bleeding (normalized to standard 56-day period). Treatment period: 2 days before WB of the 1st treatment cycle until 3rd day before the WB of the cycle after the 2nd treatment cycle (normalized to standard 56-day period). (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: baseline period (2 baseline cycles, usually 56 days) vs. treatment period (on-treatment cycles 2 and 3, usually 56 days)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.3
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.1

[back to top]

Bodily Pain as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)77.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)74.0

[back to top]

Bodily Pain as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)50.7
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)51.8

[back to top]

Social Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)78.85
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)77.35

[back to top]

Social Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)85.95
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)84.79

[back to top]

Vitality as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)62.6
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)62.2

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)4.8
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.9

[back to top]

Onset of Withdrawal Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)3.1
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.3

[back to top]

Maximum Length of Intracyclic Bleeding Episodes at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.5
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)4.9

[back to top]

Own Costs of Acupuncture Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of acupuncture per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Alternative Medicine Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of alternative medicine per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Herbs/Teas Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of herbs/teas per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Massages Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of massages per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Medical Counseling Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of medical counseling per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Pain Medication Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of pain medication per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)5.46
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)5.04

[back to top]

Own Costs of Physiotherapy Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of physiotherapy per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Own Costs of Vitamins Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their own costs of vitamins per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 1

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)19.0
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)16.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Intracyclic Bleeding at Cycle 3

Intracyclic bleeding episodes were any bleeding episodes not qualifying as withdrawal bleeding. The latter was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)10.8
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)11.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 1

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)91.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)93.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Withdrawal Bleeding at Cycle 3

Withdrawal bleeding was defined as the first bleeding episode after complete or partial progestogen withdrawal (i.e. the first episode starting after the last day of progestogen intake). If a bleeding episode was ongoing on the last day of progestogen intake and the following day, this episode was regarded as the withdrawal bleeding episode, as long as it had started not more than 4 days before the progestogen withdrawal. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At cycle 3 (28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)68.1
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)79.3

[back to top]

Physical Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)90.2
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)89.6

[back to top]

Physical Functioning as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: at final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)93.7
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)92.5

[back to top]

Role Emotional as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)81.91
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)79.18

[back to top]

Role Emotional as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Final Examination

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At final examination (28 days)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)88.64
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)83.87

[back to top]

Role Physical as Measured by General Health and Well-being Questionnaire SF-36 at Baseline Cycle

The standard questionnaire SF-36v1, a general health status measure used to evaluate patient populations and to compare health status across different populations, was completed by participants as a self-administered native language version. Percentages of absolute scores were calculated such that 0 represents the lowest possible score (worst outcome) and 100 the highest possible score (best outcome) (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At baseline cycle (28 days per cycle)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)77.8
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)79.4

[back to top]

Other Own Costs Per Treatment Converted to U.S. Dollars as Measured by Resource Use Questionnaire

The participants were asked to complete a resource use questionnaire indicating their other own costs per treatment of dysmenorrheic pain. Costs were converted to U.S. dollars. (NCT00909857)
Timeframe: At screening (average over 3 months before screening)

InterventionDollars (Median)
Estradiol Valerate, Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)0.00
Ethinyl Estradiol, Levonorgestrel (Miranova)0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. DXA scans were interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6Change from Baseline to Month 12
28-day Levonorgestrel OC0.010.01
91-day Levonorgestrel OC0.020.02
Untreated Control0.010.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Content (BMC)

Bone mineral content was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=238, 227, 358)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=238, 224, 359)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC0.090.28
91-day Levonorgestrel OC0.260.59
Untreated Control0.130.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Deoxypyridinoline

(NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=234, 224, 349)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=233, 226, 348)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC-0.10.1
91-day Levonorgestrel OC-0.1-0.1
Untreated Control0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin

(NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=236, 224, 354)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=235, 225, 348)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC-3.9-3.7
91-day Levonorgestrel OC-4.8-4.5
Untreated Control-5.1-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-terminal Propeptide

(NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventionµg/L (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=237, 225, 355)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=235, 226, 349)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC-38.7-39.8
91-day Levonorgestrel OC-49.9-50.4
Untreated Control-57.8-86.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Type I Collagen N-telopeptide

(NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
InterventionnM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=235, 224, 356)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=236, 225, 350)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC-3.9-4.3
91-day Levonorgestrel OC-4.8-4.5
Untreated Control-0.7-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Content (BMC)

Bone mineral content was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=130, 126, 149)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=130, 126, 150)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC38.7063.78
91-day Levonorgestrel OC40.7772.86
Untreated Control46.2684.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. DXA scans were interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=130, 126, 149)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=130, 126, 150)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC0.010.01
91-day Levonorgestrel OC0.010.01
Untreated Control0.010.02

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject participating in the clinical study, and did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with treatment or the clinical study. The relationship of each adverse event to study treatment or procedures, and the severity and seriousness of each adverse event was judged by the investigator, as described below.~A severe AE is defined as incapacitating, with inability to perform usual activities.~A serious adverse event is an adverse event occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes or actions:~fatal or life-threatening;~required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization;~resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;~congenital anomaly or birth defect;~important medical event." (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreat-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from study due to adverse events
28-day Levonorgestrel OC258209501233
91-day Levonorgestrel OC252141000934
Untreated Control274107001

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. DXA scans were interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=238, 227, 358)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=238, 224, 359)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC0.000.01
91-day Levonorgestrel OC0.010.02
Untreated Control0.010.01

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Months in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

"Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. DXA scans were interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists.~Percent change from Baseline was calculated as (BMD at Month 12 - BMD at Baseline)/BMD at Baseline * 100%." (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
91-day Levonorgestrel OC2.26
28-day Levonorgestrel OC1.45
Untreated Control2.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase

(NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventionµg/L (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6 (n=236, 224, 353)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=235, 225, 347)
28-day Levonorgestrel OC-5.9-6.6
91-day Levonorgestrel OC-6.8-6.9
Untreated Control-6.2-10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Content (BMC)

Bone mineral content was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and interpreted centrally by blinded, certified technologists. (NCT00924560)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12

,,
Interventiong (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Month 6Change from Baseline to Month 12
28-day Levonorgestrel OC0.691.20
91-day Levonorgestrel OC1.291.86
Untreated Control1.121.94

[back to top]

Pregnancy Rate (Expressed as Pearl Index) for Women 18 to 45 Years Old, MITT Population

Pearl Index = 1300 * number of pregnancies/number of women-cycles of treatment (NCT00932321)
Timeframe: 5.6 months (6 - 28 day cycles)

InterventionPearl Index (Number)
24 Day NA/EE1.823
21 Day NA/EE2.978

[back to top]

Mean Number of Intracyclic Bleeding (IB)/Spotting Days in Cycles 2-6, MITT Population

Self-reported via patient completed diary (none - no vaginal bleeding, light - less than normal menstruation, normal - like normal menstruation, heavy - more than normal menstruation) along with daily use of sanitary protection (other than panty liners). Light bleeding requiring no more than single pad or tampon will be spotting. (NCT00932321)
Timeframe: 5.6 months (6 - 28 day cycles)

InterventionDays (Mean)
24 Day NA/EE6.31
21 Day NA/EE7.31

[back to top]

Change in Total Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (Tibia)

Change in total volumetric bone density at the tibia with transdermal estrogen versus oral estrogen or no estrogen in amenorrheic athletes (NCT00946192)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmg HA/cm^3 (Mean)
Estrogen Patch7.01
Estrogen Pill1.17
Control3.71

[back to top]

Change in Lumbar Bone Mineral Density

Change in bone density with transdermal estrogen versus oral estrogen or no estrogen in amenorrheic athletes (NCT00946192)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
Estrogen Patch0.025
Estrogen Pill0.008
Control0.012

[back to top]

Change in Verbal Memory, Delayed Recall

Delayed recall on the Logical Memory subset of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, in which higher scores indicate a better recall and outcome. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 25. (NCT00997893)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionTest scores on the Logical Memory test (Mean)
Estradiol/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate.87
Phytoestrogen1.61
Placebo1.08

[back to top]

Change in STAI-6 Score

STAI-6; State-Trait Anxiety Inventory- Short Form is a measure of anxiety where higher scores indicate higher/elevated anxiety. Minimum value 6 is and maximum value is 24. (NCT00997893)
Timeframe: Week 0, 10, 12, and 16-18

,,
Interventionscore on STAI scale (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Early-Treatment(Week 10)Late-Treatment(Week 12)Post-Treatment (Week 16-18)
Estradiol/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate12.3111.6912.8811.84
Phytoestrogen11.8511.3810.9911.19
Placebo10.7611.2410.5511.15

[back to top]

Change in Verbal Memory, Immediate Recall

Immediate recall on the Logical Memory subset of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, in which higher scores indicate a better recall and outcome. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 25. (NCT00997893)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventiontest scores on the Logical Memory test (Mean)
Estradiol/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate-.02
Phytoestrogen2.31
Placebo2.08

[back to top]

Memory for Emotionally Valent Words and Neutral Words

Proportion correct out of 18 word pairs (6 positive, 6 negative and 6 neutral) after laboratory-induced stress using Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Maximum score is 18 and minimum score is 0; higher scores indicate a better score. (NCT00997893)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Treatment (Week 12)

,,
InterventionProportion Correct (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)- ControlBaseline (Week 0)- TSSTPost-Treatment (Week 12)- ControlPost-Treatment (Week 12)-TSST
Estradiol/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate0.450.480.470.51
Phytoestrogen0.450.400.420.46
Placebo0.380.470.370.44

[back to top]

Changes in STAI-6 Scores Before and After Psychosocial Stressor Over Time

STAI-6; State-Trait Anxiety Inventory- Short Form is a measure of anxiety where higher scores indicate higher/elevated anxiety. Minimum value 6 is and maximum value is 24. (NCT00997893)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Treatment (Week 12)

,,
Interventionscore on STAI scale (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0), Before StressorBaseline (Week 0), After StressorPost-Treatment (Week 12), Before StressorPost-Treatment (Week 12), After Stressor
Estradiol/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate8.7312.618.2513.70
Phytoestrogen8.6912.9210.8715.37
Placebo9.7712.239.6112.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level at Week 4

FSH was measured to assess estrogen receptor (ER) selectivity (a biomarker for ERα activity and a pharmacodynamic endpoint). (NCT01015677)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionmIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
MK-6913 75 mg-2.02
17-β Estradiol 1 mg-17.48
Placebo-2.96

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score (Combining Severe and Very Severe Score) at Week 4

Hot flash severity score is calculated by the sum of: the number of mild hot flashes, 2 times number of moderate hot flashes, 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, and 4 times the number of very severe hot flashes. This sum was standardized to a 7-day week if there were any missing days in the e-diary. The severity of each hot flash was recorded by the Hot Flash e-diary. (NCT01015677)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-6913 75 mg-39.92
17-β Estradiol 1 mg-45.09
Placebo-33.87

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Weekly Moderate to Very Severe Hot Flashes (Excluding Outliers) at Week 4

Hot flashes were recorded in real time and hot flashes recorded retrospectively in the morning and evening reports in a diary day via the Hot Flash e-diary were summed to determine the total number of hot flashes over a diary day. The total number of weekly moderate or worse hot flashes were calculated as the sum of the total number of hot flashes that occur over a diary week (non-missing diary day), divided by the number of days of diary completion, and multiplied by 7 (standardized week). At least 4 non-missing diary days were required to define the total number of weekly moderate or worse hot flashes. Hot flash data was excluded for participants whose number of moderate to severe hot flashes per week were in the top 1% of number of hot flashes reported to exclude any outlier effect. (NCT01015677)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-6913 75 mg-40.69
17-β Estradiol 1 mg-51.86
Placebo-34.41

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One or More Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT01015677)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-6913 75 mg17
17-β Estradiol 1 mg15
Placebo16

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT01015677)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-6913 75 mg0
17-β Estradiol 1 mg1
Placebo0

[back to top]

Estradiol

Estradiol blood levels at end of study compared across groups to determine effect of dosing methods. Significance of levels depends on the stage of puberty and goals of therapy. (NCT01023178)
Timeframe: end of study (up to 2 years)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Transdermal 17Beta Estradiol53
Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogen14
Oral 17beta Estradiol12

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population

Severity of hot flush definitions: mild - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionChange in Hot Flush Count (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-63.6
Estradiol-72.2
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-67.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population

Patient self-reported outcome. Severity of hot flush definitions: mild (1) - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate (2) - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe (3) - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep. Minimum 0/no hot flushes, Maximum 3/all severe hot flushes. Lower the score the greater the improvement in reducing hot flushes. (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionChange in Score (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-1.05
Estradiol-1.34
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-1.17

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT Population

Patient self-reported outcome. Severity of hot flush definitions: mild (1) - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate (2) - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe (3) - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep. Minimum 0/no hot flushes, Maximum 3/all severe hot flushes. Lower the score the greater the improvement in reducing hot flushes. (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionChange in Score (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-0.53
Estradiol-0.51
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-0.59

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 4, ITT Population

Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3. (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionChange in Score (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-1.89
Estradiol-2.26
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-1.96

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT (Intention to Treat) Population

Severity of hot flush definitions: mild - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionChange in Hot Flush Count (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-54.1
Estradiol-62.0
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-54.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 12, ITT Population

Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3. (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionChange in Score (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-2.49
Estradiol-2.59
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-2.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 8, ITT Population

Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3. (NCT01070979)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionChange in Score (Least Squares Mean)
Estradiol Acetate (E3A)-1.96
Estradiol-2.58
Conjugated Equine Estrogens (CEE)-2.42

[back to top]

Brachial Artery Reactivity % Flow Mediated Dilation (BAR %FMD)

This crossover study examined the effects of E+MPA versus E+DRSP on brachial artery reactivity (BAR) assessed after six weeks of treatment. BAR is a noninvasive measure of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. With this technique, inflation of an arm blood pressure cuff to suprasystolic blood pressure causes relative ischemia downstream to the cuff. Upon deflation, a brief state of increased blood flow occurs (reactive hyperemia), and the resulting increase in shear stress causes nitric oxide release and resulting vasodilation of the brachial artery (flow-mediated vasodilation). The flow-mediated changes in brachial artery diameter can be imaged by ultrasound and measured as an index of peripheral vasomotor function. BAR correlates with invasive assessments of coronary endothelial function as well as multiple cardiovascular risk factors. (NCT01109979)
Timeframe: %FMD after 6 weeks of treatment

Intervention% FMD after 6 weeks of treatment (Mean)
E+MPA5.49
E+DRSP3.39

[back to top]

Skin Microvascular Responses

"Changes in blood flow in the small vessel in the skin are measured in response to sequential heat and drug stimulation. It is measured in volts, and then corrected for a maximum level and expressed as % max. This is measured with a Laser Doppler probes, which measures volts." (NCT01153581)
Timeframe: 2 months

InterventionPercent of max volts (Mean)
Women With Orthostatic Intolerance4.02
Women Without Orthostatic Tolerance5.18

[back to top]

Orthostatic Tolerance

We used a measure called cumulative stress index to determine orthostatic tolerance, which is the amount of time at a level of negative pressure each subject can maintain before feeling as if she is going to pass out. This is calculated by multiplying the pressure in mm Hg by the time in min. (NCT01153581)
Timeframe: 2 months

InterventionmmHg*min (Mean)
Women With and Without Orthostatic Intolerance634

[back to top]

Baroreceptor Function

"This is a measure of how the body responds to changes in pressure induced by changes in position such as sitting, lying standing. The pressure changes are induced by gravity. The measurement described below to assess baroreceptor function is units of change in forearm vascular resistance for a given change in lower body negative pressure. This allows us to determine how good the body is at sending signals to the periphery to respond to postural changes.~Baroreflex sensitivity is defined as the change in interbeat interval (IBI) in milliseconds per unit change in BP. For example, when the BP rises by 10 mmHg and IBI increases by 100 ms, BRS would be 100/10 = 10 ms/mmHg." (NCT01153581)
Timeframe: 2 months

Interventionms/mm Hg (Mean)
Low Orthostatic Tolerance0.140
High Orthostatic Tolerant0.128

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1739.31
Activella® (Reference)1905.28

[back to top]

Cmax for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)475.44
Activella® (Reference)502.24

[back to top]

Cmax for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)52.09
Activella® (Reference)56.26

[back to top]

Cmax for Norethindrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone Cmax. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)10.08
Activella® (Reference)9.90

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)12387.14
Activella® (Reference)12646.49

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)387085.29
Activella® (Reference)400726.94

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-inf. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)39.94
Activella® (Reference)40.40

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)10267.03
Activella® (Reference)10214.23

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1359.50
Activella® (Reference)1410.51

[back to top]

AUC0-inf for Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone AUC0-inf. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)375439.71
Activella® (Reference)384535.16

[back to top]

Cmax for Corrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone Cmax. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)43997.17
Activella® (Reference)47015.47

[back to top]

Cmax for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)47.80
Activella® (Reference)51.59

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1575.01
Activella® (Reference)1656.16

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)372088.37
Activella® (Reference)385829.05

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-t. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)36.59
Activella® (Reference)37.05

[back to top]

Cmax for Uncorrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)43723.53
Activella® (Reference)47170.59

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)9409.59
Activella® (Reference)9762.49

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol.(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1267.50
Activella® (Reference)1323.70

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)10870.03
Activella® (Reference)11252.64

[back to top]

AUC0-t for Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone AUC0-t. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)365242.88
Activella® (Reference)374730.12

[back to top]

Cmax for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01157182)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)455.16
Activella® (Reference)481.46

[back to top]

LNG AUC

Area under the curve post-randomization for levonorgestrel. AUC was calculated and extrapolated using post randomization in single daily samples drawn during Cycle 4 days 20-26. Serial repeat sampling to obtain a detailed PK curve was not performed to obtain this AUC. Subjects could provide samples during these days at times convenient to them and PK software accounted for the time between when the drug was dosed versus when the sample was drawn. (NCT01170390)
Timeframe: post-randomization (4 months)

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Aviane & Aviane412
Aviane and Portia283

[back to top]

LNG AUC

Baseline measurements of levonorgestrel AUC (on Aviane). Area under the curve at baseline for levonorgestrel. AUC was calculated from time zero to 168 hours and extrapolated to infinity from serial repeat sampling (0,0.5,1.1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12 hours and then single samples daily for 4 days between Cycles 1 and 2. (NCT01170390)
Timeframe: baseline (2 months)

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Aviane and Aviane267
Aviane and Portia199

[back to top]

LNG Steady State at Baseline and Then Post-randomization

The main goal is to test whether key pharmacokinetic parameters of levonordestrel (LNG) differ between obese women taking traditionally dosed OCs versus the interventional arms (i.e. using each obese subject as their own control). (NCT01170390)
Timeframe: baseline (2 months) and post-randomization (4 months)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
LNG steady state levels at baselineAfter randomization (4 months)
Aviane & Aviane3.823.01
Aviane and Portia3.133.58

[back to top]

EE Steady State Baseline

Steady state levels of ethinyl estradiol (EE) at baseline (2 months) (NCT01170390)
Timeframe: Baseline (2 months)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Aviane & Aviane0.12
Aviane and Portia0.1

[back to top]

EE Steady State After Randomization

Steady state levels of ethinyl estradiol (EE) post- randomization (NCT01170390)
Timeframe: Post-randomiziation 4 months

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Aviane & Aviane0.08
Aviane and Portia0.11

[back to top]

Cmax of Corrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone Cmax. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)27076.08
Activella® (Reference)27240.03

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)398139.63
Activella® (Reference)425739.45

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)12444.22
Activella® (Reference)12977.00

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone AUC0-inf. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)380131.12
Activella® (Reference)424801.99

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1823.43
Activella® (Reference)1871.56

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)11293.21
Activella® (Reference)11747.97

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-inf. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)49.55
Activella® (Reference)50.68

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)2301.59
Activella® (Reference)2274.04

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Informational comparison of AUC0-inf values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)13592.44
Activella® (Reference)14155.46

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Corrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Corrected Total Estrone AUC0-t. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)384547.68
Activella® (Reference)407028.98

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)1723.44
Activella® (Reference)1793.04

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)10952.25
Activella® (Reference)11369.60

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Norethindrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-t. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)45.03
Activella® (Reference)46.13

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)397537.88
Activella® (Reference)420763.02

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Informational comparison of AUC0-t values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)2016.26
Activella® (Reference)2086.39

[back to top]

Cmax of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)513.56
Activella® (Reference)529.23

[back to top]

Cmax of Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)59.24
Activella® (Reference)60.33

[back to top]

Cmax of Uncorrected Total Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Uncorrected Total Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)27256.41
Activella® (Reference)27430.77

[back to top]

Cmax of Norethindrone (Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone Cmax. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 36 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)6.54
Activella® (Reference)6.06

[back to top]

Cmax of Corrected Unconjugated Estrone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Corrected Unconjugated Estrone. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)492.81
Activella® (Reference)509.81

[back to top]

Cmax of Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Informational comparison of Cmax values for Corrected Unconjugated Estradiol. (NCT01181726)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate (Test)55.18
Activella® (Reference)56.24

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-inf. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1236.96
YAZ® (Reference)1235.91

[back to top]

Cmax of Drospirenone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone Cmax. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)67.69
YAZ® (Reference)74.33

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone AUC0-t. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)814.32
YAZ® (Reference)824.41

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-t. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1145.90
YAZ® (Reference)1155.31

[back to top]

Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol Cmax. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)128.87
YAZ® (Reference)126.03

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone AUC0-inf. (NCT01182194)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)866.91
YAZ® (Reference)884.24

[back to top]

Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol Cmax. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)87.95
YAZ® (Reference)91.23

[back to top]

Cmax of Drospirenone(Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone Cmax. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)52.77
YAZ® (Reference)53.65

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-t. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1066.24
YAZ® (Reference)1079.54

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone AUC0-t. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)889.67
YAZ® (Reference)867.10

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-inf. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 72 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1155.69
YAZ® (Reference)1175.76

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Drospirenone(Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity)

Bioequivalence based on Drospirenone AUC0-inf. (NCT01182207)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 120 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)951.18
YAZ® (Reference)930.38

[back to top]

Comparing Estradiol AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))

Estradiol was measured on day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 on 3 consecutive menstrual period (pre administration/Baseline(BL), study drug administration(SDA), post administration/follow up(FU)) and calculated AUC from these data (NCT01253824)
Timeframe: Day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of menstrual cycles

,
Interventionpg・day/mL, (Mean)
Difference of estradiol AUC (BL-SDA)Difference of estradiol AUC(FU-SDA)
IKH-012478.02434.9
NPC-011654.71872.6

[back to top]

Comparing FSH AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))

FSH was measured on day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 on 3 consecutive menstrual period (pre administration/Baseline(BL), study drug administration(SDA), post administration/follow up(FU)) and calculated AUC from these data (NCT01253824)
Timeframe: Day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of menstrual cycles

,
InterventionmIU・day/mL (Mean)
Differnce of FSH (BL-SDA)Difference of FSH(FP-SDA)
IKH-01-4.3800.538
NPC-01-9.609-4.404

[back to top]

Comparing LH AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))

LH was measured on day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 on 3 consecutive menstrual period (pre administration/Baseline(BL), study drug administration(SDA), post administration/follow up(FU)) and calculated AUC from these data (NCT01253824)
Timeframe: Day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of menstrual cycles

,
InterventionmIU・day/mL (Mean)
Difference of LH(BL-SDA)Difference of LH(FU-SDA)
IKH-0157.12459.837
NPC-0160.87461.571

[back to top]

Comparing Progesterone AUC of Menstrual Period During Study Drug Administration With Pre and Post Study Drug Administration (Baseline(BL)-Study Drug Administration(SDA), Follow up(FU)-Study Drug Administration(ADA))

Progesterone was measured on day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 on 3 consecutive menstrual period (pre administration/Baseline(BL), study drug administration(SDA), post administration/follow up(FU)) and calculated AUC from these data (NCT01253824)
Timeframe: Day 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of menstrual cycles

,
Interventionng・day/mL (Mean)
Difference of progesterone(BL-SDA)Difference of progesterone(FU-SDA)
IKH-0193.14859.344
NPC-0154.17189.711

[back to top]

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Changes in Response to Estrogen and Aging - Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex (DLPFC)

Change in extracted beta coefficients of the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal response to a cognitive task (N-back) in the DLPFC (x,y,z coordinates = -34 44 16) from baseline to 1 month as a function of aging and estrogen (young vs older and estrogen vs placebo). A positive change indicates an increase in oxygen utilization (inferring increased neuronal functioning) between baseline and treatment during the cognitive task, while a negative change indicates a decrease in oxygen utilization between baseline and treatment during the cognitive task. (NCT01268046)
Timeframe: baseline to 1 month

Interventionlinear beta extractions (Mean)
Young Postmenopausal Women - Estrogen455.8
Older Postmenopausal Women - Estrogen-214.4
Young Postmenopausal Women - Placebo-348.1
Older Postmenopausal Women - Placebo90.1

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)

Idiopathic VTE=deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) occurring in absence of known risk factors. Incidence rate reported for current, past users. Current user=had claim for study OC prescription (Lybrel or other OCs containing ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg) whose filled use occurred within 30 days prior to or at index date. Past user=had claim for a study OC prescription whose filled use occurred between 90 to 31 days prior to index date. Index date=date of VTE diagnosis for case and corresponding date for matched control. (NCT01297348)
Timeframe: Index date (date of VTE diagnosis for case and corresponding date for matched control)

,,
Interventionincidence rate per 100000 person-years (Number)
Current usersPast users
Lybrel176.254.1
Other OCs: Ethinyl Estradiol 20 Mcg (EE-20)87.518.0
Other OCs: Levonorgestrel, Ethinyl Estradiol 20 Mcg (Levo-20)50.517.6

[back to top]

Number of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Cases and Matched Controls

Idiopathic VTE cases=new DVT, PE or CVST occurring in absence of known risk factors. Matched Control was defined as participants with no diagnosis of VTE matched for age, calendar time, exposure status and database. Current user=had claim for study OC prescription (Lybrel or other OCs containing ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg) whose filled use occurred within 30 days prior to or at index date. Past user=had claim for a study OC prescription whose filled use occurred between 90 to 31 days prior to index date. Index date=date of VTE diagnosis for case and corresponding date for matched control. (NCT01297348)
Timeframe: Index date (date of VTE diagnosis for case and corresponding date for matched control)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Current user: CaseCurrent user: Matched ControlPast user: CasePast user: Matched Control
Lybrel174711
Other OCs: Ethinyl Estradiol 20 Mcg (EE-20)27611441439
Other OCs: Levonorgestrel, Ethinyl Estradiol 20 Mcg (Levo-20)53254410

[back to top]

Change in Trabecular Number at the Ultradistal Radius Over a 12-month Period

Change in trabecular number at the ultradistal radius over 12 months as assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) (NCT01301183)
Timeframe: 12 months

Intervention1/mm (Median)
Rh IGF-1 + Transdermal Estradiol-0.10
Placebo + Transdermal Estradiol-0.02

[back to top]

Change in Bone Density Over a 12-month Period

Change in lumbar spine BMD z-score over 12 months as assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) The z-score indicates the number of standard deviations that BMD is away from the mean for age, sex and race. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher values. A positive change in z-scores indicates a favorable outcome whereas a negative change in z-scores indicates an unfavorable outcome. (NCT01301183)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Rh IGF-1 + Transdermal Estradiol0.045
Placebo + Transdermal Estradiol0.280

[back to top]

Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol Cmax (maximum observed concentration of drug substance in plasma). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)230.56
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)237.00

[back to top]

Cmax of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone Cmax (maximum observed concentration of drug substance in plasma). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)10.94
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)10.00

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-inf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)48.67
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)45.43

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1976.72
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)1989.82

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)43.83
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)40.73

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-inf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity). (NCT01340625)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)2129.43
Ovcon® 35 Fe (Reference)2131.84

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-inf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)2072.5423
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)2152.3775

[back to top]

AUC0-inf of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-inf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)43.9982
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)43.8819

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)1916.2311
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)1987.6311

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)37.8065
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)37.3991

[back to top]

Cmax of Ethinyl Estradiol

Bioequivalence based on Ethinyl Estradiol Cmax (maximum observed concentration of drug substance in plasma). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)137.6758
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)137.8485

[back to top]

Cmax of Norethindrone

Bioequivalence based on Norethindrone Cmax (maximum observed concentration of drug substance in plasma). (NCT01344369)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over a 60 hour period.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Norethindrone/Ethinyl Estradiol (Test)4.3306
FEMCON® Fe (Reference)4.2282

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Antithrombin

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 75% to 130%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)-1.6
Treatment II-3.2

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)-Based Activated Protein-C (APC) Resistance

This hemostatic parameter is calculated by dividing the clotting time with APC by the clotting time without APC. Normal range for this measure was defined as a ratio of 2.00 to 3.36. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)-0.3
Treatment II-0.4

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Period in Protein S Total Antigen

The normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 50% to 147%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal 50% to 147% (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)-11.4
Treatment II-6.6

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor II Activity

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 70% to 150%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)3.3
Treatment II3.0

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

Normal range for this parameter was 0.35 to 5.5 mIU/L. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

InterventionmIU/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)0.2
Treatment II0.3

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Sex Hormone Binding Globulin

Normal range for this parameter was 28 to 146 nmol/L. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)163.4
Treatment II149.1

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Serum Random Total Cortisol

Normal range for this adrenal parameter was 85.6 to 618.2 nmol/L. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)239.0
Treatment II230.8

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 Levels

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 41 to 372 pmol/L. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)45.0
Treatment II56.8

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Protein C Activity

The normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 70% to 180%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)16.3
Treatment II13.0

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor VIII

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 50% to 180%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)11.1
Treatment II10.6

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Factor VII

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 60% to 150%. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionpercentage of normal (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)17.9
Treatment II15.1

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Endogenous Thrombin Potential (EPT)-Based Activated Protein-C (APC) Resistance

This hemostatic parameter is calculated by dividing the clotting time with APC by the clotting time without APC. Normal range for this measure was defined as a ratio of 0.32 to 1.79. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)0.8
Treatment II0.7

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in D-Dimer

Normal range for this hemostatic parameter was 0 to 729 mcg/L. Participants were in a fasting state and had refrained from moderate to vigorous exercise prior to phlebotomy on the day of this lab draw. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionmcg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)16.4
Treatment II13.4

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline Over the 6-Month Treatment Period in Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin

Normal range for this adrenal parameter was 1906.448 to 4520.504 mg/L. Change from baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, treatment, month, and the treatment by month interaction. (NCT01388491)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 6

Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment I: (DR-102)4083.3
Treatment II3721.8

[back to top]

Mean Change the Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms

"Patients completed a daily diary to record the number of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms experienced each day.~Mild, moderate and severe were defined as follows:~Mild = sensation of heat without sweating Moderate = sensation of heat with sweating, ability to continue activity Severe = sensation of heat with sweating, causing discontinuation of activity Severity of hot flushes was measured on a scale of none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3." (NCT01389102)
Timeframe: baseline to week 12 (12 weeks)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Transdermal Three 90 μL Sprays-0.31
Placebo Transdermal Two 90 μL Sprays-0.54
Placebo Transdermal One 90 μL Spray-0.26
Estradiol Transdermal Three 90 μL Sprays-1.07
Estradiol Transdermal Two 90 μL Sprays-0.92
Estradiol Transdermal One 90 μL Spray-1.04

[back to top]

Mean Change in the Number of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Per Day

"Patients completed a daily diary to record the number of mild, moderate and number of moderate or severe vasomotor symptoms [hot flushes and sweating] experienced each day.~Mild, moderate and severe hot flushes and sweating were defined as follows:~Mild = sensation of heat without sweating Moderate = sensation of heat with sweating, ability to continue activity Severe = sensation of heat with sweating, causing discontinuation of activity" (NCT01389102)
Timeframe: baseline to week 12

InterventionVasomotor symptoms per day (Mean)
Placebo Transdermal Three 90 μL Sprays-5.32
Placebo Transdermal Two 90 μL Sprays-6.19
Placebo Transdermal One 90 μL Spray-4.76
Estradiol Transdermal Three 90 μL Sprays-8.44
Estradiol Transdermal Two 90 μL Sprays-8.66
Estradiol Transdermal One 90 μL Spray-8.10

[back to top]

Frequency of Hot Flashes (Daily Vasomotor Symptom [VMS] Frequency) -- Week 8

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night). The day and night frequencies were summed to produce a single number of hot flashes per day. The single number of hot flashes per day were summed and averaged for one week prior to the week 8 study assessment to produce a mean daily frequency for week 8. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionnumber of hot flashes per day (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper3.9
Venlafaxine XR4.4
Placebo5.5

[back to top]

Bothersomeness of Hot Flashes -- Week 8

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night) for 7 days. Bothersomeness ratings ranged from 0 to 3 with lower numbers being less bothersome and higher numbers being more bothersome. Data from the day and night bothersomeness ratings were averaged for a single daily score. The single daily scores for the week prior to the week 8 study assessment were summed and averaged to produce a mean daily VMS bothersomeness for week 8. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper1.4
Venlafaxine XR1.4
Placebo1.6

[back to top]

Bothersomeness of Hot Flashes -- Week 4

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night) for 7 days. Bothersomeness ratings ranged from 0 to 3 with lower numbers being less bothersome and higher numbers being more bothersome. Data from the day and night bothersomeness ratings were averaged for a single daily score. The single daily scores for the week prior to the week 4 study assessment were summed and averaged to produce a mean daily VMS bothersomeness for week 4. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper1.6
Venlafaxine XR1.6
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Hot Flashes (Vasomotor Symptom [VMS] Frequency) -- Week 4

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night). The day and night frequencies were summed to produce a single number of hot flashes per day. The single number of hot flashes per day were summed and averaged for one week prior to the week 4 study assessment to produce a mean daily frequency for week 4. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionnumber of hot flashes per day (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper5.3
Venlafaxine XR5.1
Placebo5.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Severity of Hot Flashes -- Week 4

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night) for 7 days. Severity ratings ranged from 0 to 3 with lower numbers being less severe and higher numbers being more severe. Data from the day and night severity ratings were averaged for a single daily score. The single daily scores for the week prior to the week 4 study assessment were summed and averaged to produce a mean daily VMS severity for week 4. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper0.7
Venlafaxine XR0.7
Placebo0.8

[back to top]

Severity of Hot Flashes -- Week 8

Measured by self-report diary twice daily (day and night) for 7 days. Severity ratings ranged from 0 to 3 with lower numbers being less severe and higher numbers being more severe. Data from the day and night severity ratings were averaged for a single daily score. The single daily scores for the week prior to the week 8 study assessment were summed and averaged to produce a mean daily VMS severity for week 8. (NCT01418209)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Low-dose 17-ß-estradiol With Progesterone Taper0.6
Venlafaxine XR0.6
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Percentage of Days With Moderate to Very Heavy Bleeding

"Participants recorded the previous days' presence and severity of bleeding every morning in an electronic diary (eDiary) according to the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson Menstrual Bleeding Scale:~1 (Spotting): A drop or 2 of blood, not even requiring sanitary protection.~2 (Very light): Needing to change the least absorbent tampon or pad 1 to 2 times per day.~3 (Light): Needing to change a low or regular absorbency tampon or pad 2 or 3 times per day.~4 (Moderate): Needing to change a regular absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~5 (Heavy): Needing to change a high absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~6 (Very heavy/gushing): Very heavy bleeding, protection hardly works at all; needing to change the highest absorbency tampon or pad every hour or 2.~A day with moderate to very heavy bleeding is defined as a days with a bleeding score ≥ 3." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (average bleeding score over the 30 days prior to first dose) and month 3 (average bleeding score over days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-7.22
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-5.00
Cohort 4 Placebo-4.00
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-7.03
Cohort 1 Placebo-3.08
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-7.92
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-6.15
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-8.02
Cohort 2 Placebo-3.31
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-6.80

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding (Spotting Allowed) or Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

"Suppression of bleeding is defined as no record of bleeding (spotting allowed) in the e-diary and no record of bleeding Indicated in the alkaline hematin data during the last 56 days of treatment.~Amenorrhea is defined as no record of bleeding or spotting indicated in the e-diary and no record of bleeding or spotting Indicated in the alkaline hematin data during the last 56 days of treatment." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: The last 56 days of treatment (approximately days 33 to 90)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Suppression of bleedingAmenorrhea
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID6644
Cohort 1 Placebo00
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID7966
Cohort 2 Placebo00
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA3119
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID4531
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD6660
Cohort 4 Placebo00
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD7773
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP3219

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No Change, Decrease From Baseline, or Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3

"The percentage of subjects with changes in hemoglobin concentration from Baseline to Month 3 in each of the following categories:~No change from baseline in hemoglobin~Decrease from baseline in hemoglobin ≥ -0.5 g/dL~Decrease from baseline in hemoglobin ≥ -1.0 g/dL~Increase from baseline in hemoglobin ≥ 0.5 g/dL~Increase from baseline in hemoglobin ≥ 1.0 g/dL~The above categories are not all mutually exclusive or exhaustive." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No ChangeDecreases from -0.5 to 0 g/dLDecreases from -1.0 to -0.5 g/dLIncrease ≥ 0.5 g/dLIncrease ≥ 1.0 g/dL
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID04116759
Cohort 1 Placebo021142929
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID0007652
Cohort 2 Placebo02172929
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA01407543
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID01747171
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD0947861
Cohort 4 Placebo9027189
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD4448357
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP55107162

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Uterine Bleeding or Moderate to Very Heavy Uterine Bleeding at Month 3

"Participants recorded the previous days' presence and severity of bleeding every morning in an eDiary according to the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson Menstrual Bleeding Scale:~1 (Spotting): A drop or 2 of blood, not even requiring sanitary protection.~2 (Very light): Needing to change the least absorbent tampon or pad 1 to 2 times per day.~3 (Light): Needing to change a low or regular absorbency tampon or pad 2 or 3 times per day.~4 (Moderate): Needing to change a regular absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~5 (Heavy): Needing to change a high absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~6 (Very heavy/gushing): Very heavy bleeding, protection hardly works at all; needing to change the highest absorbency tampon or pad every hour or 2.~Any bleeding is defined as a score ≥ 1 and moderate to very heavy bleeding is defined as a score ≥ 3." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Month 3 (average bleeding score over days 61 to 90)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any bleedingModerate to Very Heavy Bleeding
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID4728
Cohort 1 Placebo9482
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID267
Cohort 2 Placebo8073
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA7831
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID5740
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD3727
Cohort 4 Placebo9387
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD2715
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP6935

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Uterine Fibroids Daily Symptom Scale Scores

The uterine fibroid daily symptom scale is self-administered questionnaire, with a scale that ranges from 0 to 10 for the symptoms of pelvic pain, fatigue, and cramping and the impact of uterine fibroids on the subject's daily life, with 0 being the absence of the symptom and 10 being the worst severity of the symptoms or completely preventing the subjects from performing daily activities. Participants self-reported values daily in the e-Diary. (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (average score over the 30 days prior to first dose) and month 3 (average score over days 61 to 90)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pelvic painFatigueMenstrual crampingImpact of uterine fibroids
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.6-0.6-0.9-1.0
Cohort 1 Placebo-1.4-0.5-1.2-1.0
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-1.0-1.5-1.2-1.3
Cohort 2 Placebo-1.2-0.5-1.0-1.0
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-1.1-1.2-0.9-0.9
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-0.2-0.0-0.7-0.4
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-1.0-0.5-1.2-1.1
Cohort 4 Placebo-0.3-0.6-0.5-0.8
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-0.9-1.0-1.1-1.7
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-2.4-2.1-1.3-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QoL)

"The UFS-QoL is a disease-specific, self-administered, validated questionnaire developed to evaluate the symptoms associated with uterine fibroids and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. The questionnaire consists of 37 questions, divided into 2 parts: 1) an 8-item symptom severity scale and 2) a 29-item HRQL subscale comprising 6 domains (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consiousness, and sexual function), with a 4-week recall. All items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from not at all to a very great deal for symptom severity items and none of the time to all of the time for the HRQL items. Symptom severity and HRQL subscale scores were summed and transformed into a 0 to 100 point scale to provide a total score for each of the 2 components.~Lower symptom severity scores indicate better quality of life and higher total HRQL scores indicate better quality of life." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Symptom severityHRQL total
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-31.636.0
Cohort 1 Placebo-21.418.3
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-44.133.5
Cohort 2 Placebo-12.011.0
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-20.328.6
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-33.229.1
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-39.035.3
Cohort 4 Placebo-19.616.3
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-36.429.9
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-39.133.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Subject Surgery Intention Questionnaire (SSIQ) Version 2.0

"The Subject Intention Questionnaire (SSIQ) is a non-validated, exploratory questionnaires intended to evaluate the subject's intent to undergo surgical procedures if current endometriosis-associated symptoms continued. The scoring scale ranged from 0 (not at all likely to consider surgery) to 10 (very likely to consider surgery).~SSIQ included the 2 following questions:~How likely are you to consider having myomectomy surgery to treat your uterine fibroid if your symptoms continue as they are now?~How likely are you to consider hysterectomy surgery if your uterine fibroid symptoms continue as they are now?" (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Likelihood of having myomectomyLikelihood of having hysterectomy
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.8-0.8
Cohort 1 Placebo2.3-0.3
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-0.60.2
Cohort 2 Placebo0.40.0
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-1.4-0.7
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-3.1-1.9
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-1.20.0
Cohort 4 Placebo1.02.0
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-1.7-0.8
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP0.1-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Physician Surgery Intention Questionnaire (PSIQ) Version 2.0

"The Physician Intention Questionnaire (PSIQ) is a non-validated, exploratory questionnaire intended to evaluate the investigator's intent to recommend surgical procedures if current endometriosis-associated symptoms continued. The scoring scale ranged from 0 (not at all likely to recommend surgery) to 10 (very likely to recommend surgery).~The PSIQ included the 2 following questions:~How likely are you to recommend myomectomy to treat this patient's uterine fibroid if her symptoms continue as they are now?~How likely are you to recommend definitive surgery hysterectomy for this patient if her uterine fibroid symptoms continue as they are now?" (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Likelihood to recommend myomectomyLikelihood to recommend hysterectomy
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.8-2.2
Cohort 1 Placebo0.70.4
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-1.2-1.5
Cohort 2 Placebo0.0-0.6
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-0.6-1.4
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-1.3-1.8
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-0.9-0.8
Cohort 4 Placebo-2.7-0.2
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-1.3-2.3
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP0.0-2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MBL < 80 mL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment

"The alkaline hematin method was used for the assessment of MBL. Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment.~Participants with missing MBL volume for the last treatment period and no bleeding indicated in the electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) in the last treatment period, and participants with no post-baseline MBL data were assigned an MBL value of zero." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: The last 28 days of treatment (approximately days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD84
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID74
Cohort 4 Placebo13
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID85
Cohort 1 Placebo22
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA88
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD93
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID97
Cohort 2 Placebo47
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP88

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MBL < 80 mL and With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in MBL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment

"The alkaline hematin method was used for the assessment of MBL. Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment.~Participants with missing MBL volume for the last treatment period and no bleeding indicated in the electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) in the last treatment period, and participants with no post-baseline MBL data were assigned an MBL value of zero." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (last menstrual cycle during the screening period) and the last 28 days of treatment (approximately days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD84
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID74
Cohort 4 Placebo13
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID85
Cohort 1 Placebo17
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA85
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD93
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID97
Cohort 2 Placebo33
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP85

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction in Volume of Largest Fibroid at Month 3 / Final Visit

The volume of the largest fibroid was determined using transabdominal ultrasound. The images were analyzed by a central imaging center. (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3 or the final visit during the treatment period for participants who prematurely discontinued.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD57
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID52
Cohort 4 Placebo33
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID68
Cohort 1 Placebo35
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA58
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD60
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID55
Cohort 2 Placebo27
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP48

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction in Uterine Volume at Month 3 / Final Visit

Uterine volume was determined using transabdominal ultrasound. The images were analyzed by a central imaging center. (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3 or the final visit during the treatment period for participants who prematurely discontinued.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD53
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID43
Cohort 4 Placebo7
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID48
Cohort 1 Placebo11
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA42
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD56
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID69
Cohort 2 Placebo7
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP25

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to the Last 28 Days of Treatment in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)

"The alkaline hematin method was used for the assessment of MBL. Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment.~Participants with missing MBL volume for the last treatment period and no bleeding indicated in the electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) in the last treatment period, and participants with no post-baseline MBL data were assigned an MBL value of zero." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (last menstrual cycle during the screening period) and the last 28 days of treatment (approximately days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-83.83
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-71.85
Cohort 4 Placebo-6.98
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-81.03
Cohort 1 Placebo-11.12
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-79.60
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-88.58
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-97.31
Cohort 2 Placebo-42.64
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-85.39

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Volume of the Largest Fibroid

The volume of the largest fibroid was determined using transabdominal ultrasound. The images were analyzed by a central imaging center. (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD14.23
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-22.19
Cohort 4 Placebo-7.26
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-38.52
Cohort 1 Placebo-2.05
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-25.77
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-16.60
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-35.79
Cohort 2 Placebo6.70
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-4.94

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 28 Days of Treatment in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)

"The alkaline hematin method was used for the assessment of MBL. Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment.~Participants with missing MBL volume for the last treatment period and no bleeding indicated in the electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) in the last treatment period, and participants with no post-baseline MBL data were assigned an MBL value of zero." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (last menstrual cycle during the screening period) and the last 28 days of treatment (approximately days 61 to 90)

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionmL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID335.11-272.97
Cohort 1 Placebo251.72-79.00
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID206.27-202.57
Cohort 2 Placebo349.17-175.31
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA247.70-192.33
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID269.36-184.69
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD213.70-183.97
Cohort 4 Placebo321.73-10.46
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD215.62-189.05
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP257.99-216.15

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Uterine Volume

Uterine volume was determined using transabdominal ultrasound. The images were analyzed by a central imaging center. (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-21.01
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-21.37
Cohort 4 Placebo18.72
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-21.68
Cohort 1 Placebo-8.62
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-17.43
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-27.99
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-33.25
Cohort 2 Placebo-1.92
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-10.06

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Month 3

(NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD1.18
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID1.30
Cohort 4 Placebo-0.43
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID1.13
Cohort 1 Placebo0.28
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA0.92
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD1.40
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID1.19
Cohort 2 Placebo0.31
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP1.54

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in MBL During the Last 28 Days of Treatment

"The alkaline hematin method was used for the assessment of MBL. Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment.~Participants with missing MBL volume for the last treatment period and no bleeding indicated in the electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) in the last treatment period, and participants with no post-baseline MBL data were assigned an MBL value of zero." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (last menstrual cycle during the screening period) and the last 28 days of treatment (approximately days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD84
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID74
Cohort 4 Placebo13
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID91
Cohort 1 Placebo28
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA85
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD93
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID97
Cohort 2 Placebo40
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Uterine Bleeding Score

"Participants recorded the previous days' presence and severity of bleeding every morning in an electronic diary (eDiary) according to the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson Menstrual Bleeding Scale:~1 (Spotting): A drop or 2 of blood, not even requiring sanitary protection.~2 (Very light): Needing to change the least absorbent tampon or pad 1 to 2 times per day.~3 (Light): Needing to change a low or regular absorbency tampon or pad 2 or 3 times per day.~4 (Moderate): Needing to change a regular absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~5 (Heavy): Needing to change a high absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~6 (Very heavy/gushing): Very heavy bleeding, protection hardly works at all; needing to change the highest absorbency tampon or pad every hour or 2." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (average bleeding score over the 30 days prior to first dose) and month 3 (average bleeding score over days 61 to 90)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-0.50
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-0.37
Cohort 4 Placebo-0.19
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.52
Cohort 1 Placebo-0.22
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA-0.24
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-0.44
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-0.53
Cohort 2 Placebo-0.38
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP-0.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Percentage of Days With Any Uterine Bleeding

"Participants recorded the previous days' presence and severity of bleeding every morning in an electronic diary (eDiary) according to the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson Menstrual Bleeding Scale:~1 (Spotting): A drop or 2 of blood, not even requiring sanitary protection.~2 (Very light): Needing to change the least absorbent tampon or pad 1 to 2 times per day.~3 (Light): Needing to change a low or regular absorbency tampon or pad 2 or 3 times per day.~4 (Moderate): Needing to change a regular absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~5 (Heavy): Needing to change a high absorbency tampon or pad every 3 to 4 hours.~6 (Very heavy/gushing): Very heavy bleeding, protection hardly works at all; needing to change the highest absorbency tampon or pad every hour or 2.~A day with any uterine bleeding is defined as a days with a bleeding score ≥ 1." (NCT01441635)
Timeframe: Baseline (average bleeding score over the 30 days prior to first dose) and month 3 (average bleeding score over days 61 to 90)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Cohort 4 Elagolix 400 mg QD-15.22
Cohort 4 Elagolix 100 mg BID-11.00
Cohort 4 Placebo-5.78
Cohort 1 Elagolix 200 mg BID-15.82
Cohort 1 Placebo-6.99
Cohort 3 Elagolix 200 mg BID + LD E2/NETA3.63
Cohort 5 Elagolix 600 mg QD-15.38
Cohort 2 Elagolix 300 mg BID-16.91
Cohort 2 Placebo-13.95
Cohort 6 Elagolix 300 mg BID + CEP1.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 3

Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 3. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
Comedones Counts: Change at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Papules Counts: Change at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Pustules Counts: Change at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Nodules Counts: Change at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Total Counts: Change at Month 3 (n=93, 96)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)5.601.890.700.008.19
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)5.712.830.630.128.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 1

Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 1. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
Comedones Counts: BaselinePapules Counts: BaselinePustules Counts: BaselineNodules Counts: BaselineTotal Counts: BaselineComedones Counts: Change at Month 1Papules Counts: Change at Month 1Pustules Counts: Change at Month 1Nodules Counts: Change at Month 1Total Counts: Change at Month 1
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)11.434.461.120.0017.003.440.620.18-0.024.22
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)10.974.320.900.1216.313.430.200.350.124.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 6

Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 6. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
Comedones Counts: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Papules Counts: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Pustules Counts: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Nodules Counts: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Total Counts: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)8.212.770.960.0011.94
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)9.023.520.770.1313.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 6

Change from Baseline in body weight is the value at Month 6 minus value at Baseline. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Baseline (n=100,101)Change at Month 6 (n=93,95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)54.24-0.20
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)55.62-0.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 6

Blood pressure is the pressure of blood flowing through blood vessels. Change from Baseline in blood pressure is the value at Month 6 minus value at Baseline. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (Mean)
Systolic BP: Baseline (n=100/101)Diastolic BP: Baseline (n=100/101)Systolic BP: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Diastolic BP: Change at Month 6 (n=93, 95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)110.269.47-0.24-0.48
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)110.670.230.33-0.80

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Showing Treatment Response on the Investigator's Global Assessment at Month 6

Percentage of participants showing treatment response on the Investigator's global assessment was graded on a 5-point scale as 0=worse, 1=no change, 2=fair, 3=good, and 4=excellent. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Month 6

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
0 (Worse)1 (No Change)2 (Fair)3 (Good)4 (Excellent)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)1.031.0323.7152.5821.65
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)5.054.044.0443.4343.43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Categorical Score for Sebum Assessment at Month 1, 3 and 6

Sebum assessment that is facial seborrhea (very oily skin) was assessed using sebutape strip on the forehead. Percentage of participants with facial seborrhea were assessed using categorical scores ranging from level 1 (lowest) to level 5 (highest). Highest level indicates worsening. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3 and 6

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Level 1: Baseline (n=100,101)Level 2: Baseline (n=100,101)Level 3: Baseline (n=100,101)Level 4: Baseline (n=100,101)Level 5: Baseline (n=100,101)Level 1: Month 1 (n=100,101)Level 2: Month 1 (n=100,101)Level 3: Month 1 (n=100,101)Level 4: Month 1 (n=100,101)Level 5: Month 1 (n=100,101)Level 1: Month 3 (n=93, 96)Level 2: Month 3 (n=93, 96)Level 3: Month 3 (n=93, 96)Level 4: Month 3 (n=93, 96)Level 5: Month 3 (n=93, 96)Level 1: Month 6 (n=93, 95)Level 2: Month 6 (n=93, 95)Level 3: Month 6 (n=93, 95)Level 4: Month 6 (n=93, 95)Level 5: Month 6 (n=93, 95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)3.9612.8744.5534.653.968.9111.8845.5432.670.9910.4214.5859.3814.581.0422.1143.1629.475.260.00
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)3.0010.0043.0031.0013.007.0013.0047.0030.003.006.4534.4145.1611.832.1544.0927.9620.436.451.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Response at the End-of-Therapy by Participant's Self-Assessment at Month 6

Participant's self-assessment at end-of-therapy was measured by using the self-assessment questionnaire which included 3 questions, about the rating of acne improvement since start of study; comparison of this acne treatment with the one used in past and the continuity of treatment on physician's prescription to evaluate efficacy and acceptability of the study medication. The score was graded at 4 parameters as excellent, better, no change and worse. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentBetterNo ChangeWorse
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)355831
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)474534

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vaginal Blood Loss at Month 1, 3 and 6

Vaginal blood loss encompasses spotting and bleeding. Spotting is defined as a bleeding requiring no or at most one sanitary pad per day; however, bleeding requires two or more sanitary pads per day. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Month 1, 3 and 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Spotting at Month 1 (n=100,101)Spotting at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Spotting at Month 6 (n=93, 95)Bleeding at Month 1 (n=100,101)Bleeding at Month 3 (n=93, 96)Bleeding at Month 6 (n=93, 95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)243473
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)5641346

[back to top]

Number of Participants Non-Compliant With Therapy

Compliance was assessed by transforming the data of forgotten tablets listed in the diary cards. Number of participants who forgot to take the drug was reported. (NCT01466673)
Timeframe: Month 1, 3 and 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
At Month 1 (n=100, 101)At Month 3 (n=93, 96)At Month 6 (n=93, 95)
Ethinyl Estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)5106
Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)71310

[back to top]

Total to HDL Cholesterol Ratio

(NCT01546454)
Timeframe: Entire Study

InterventionTotal to HDL Cholesterol Ratio (Mean)
Non-steroidal Effects0.146
Contraceptive Effects0.148
Steroid Effects-0.89

[back to top]

Intensity of Breakthrough Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 3

Intensity of breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting (BTB-S) during Cycle 3 was defined as the ratio of the number of breakthrough bleeding days divided by the number of breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting days. Breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting (BTB-S) is defined as any bleeding or spotting episode that occurred during the expected non-bleeding period that was neither an early nor a continued withdrawal bleeding. Bleeding = any bloody vaginal discharge that required one or more sanitary pads or tampons per day; Spotting = any bloody vaginal discharge that required no sanitary pads or tampons per day. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 3 through Day 28 Cycle 3 (Up to ~ 28 days)

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day0.42
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day0.80
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day0.68
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day0.73
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day0.67
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day0.33
NuvaRing®0.67

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progesterone Concentrations >16 Nmol/L, by Cycle

Maximum progesterone (Max P) was defined as the maximum progesterone value. Ovulation was defined as 2 or more consecutive progesterone concentrations >16 nmol/L within 5 days during the 3 treatment cycles, supported by ultrasound evidence of ovulation. The Max P values greater than 16 nmol/L are presented by vaginal ring group and cycle. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 1 through Day 28 of Treatment Cycle 3 (Up to ~92 days)

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle 1 Max P > 16 nmol/LCycle 2 Max P > 16 nmol/LCycle 3 Max P > 16 nmol/L
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day000
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day000
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day000
NuvaRing®000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ovulation Incidence, by Cycle

Ovulation was defined as having 2 or more consecutive progesterone concentrations >16 nmol/L within 5 days, confirmed by ultrasound evidence of ovulation (follicular rupture or preceding presence of a follicle-like structure >15 mm in size). (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 1 through Day 28 of Treatment Cycle 3 (Up to ~92 days)

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day000
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day000
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day000
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day000
NuvaRing®000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 3

Breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting (BTB-S) is defined as any bleeding or spotting episode that occurred during the expected non-bleeding period that was neither an early nor a continued withdrawal bleeding. Bleeding = any bloody vaginal discharge that required one or more sanitary pads or tampons per day; Spotting = any bloody vaginal discharge that required no sanitary pads or tampons per day. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 3 through Day 28 Cycle 3 (Up to ~28 days)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day14.6
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day13.3
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day17.5
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day13.6
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day16.3
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day6.4
NuvaRing®6.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Withdrawal Bleeding and/or Spotting During Cycle 2

Withdrawal bleeding and/or spotting is considered any bleeding or spotting episode that starts during or continues into the expected bleeding period (i.e., when the ring has been removed the last week of the cycle). Absence of withdrawal bleeding is no withdrawal bleeding and/or spotting episodes during an expected bleeding period when the ring has been removed. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 2 through Day 28 Cycle 2 (Up to ~28 days)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day5.5
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day1.9
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day4.4
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day7.8
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day3.7
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day1.9
NuvaRing®1.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Serious Adverse Event

A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE that results in death, is life threatening, requires or prolongs an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is a cancer, is associated with an overdose; or is another important medical event deemed such by medical or scientific judgment. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Up to ~92 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day0.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day0.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day0.0
NuvaRing®0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Up to ~92 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day43.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day40.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day43.6
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day37.7
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day39.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day46.5
NuvaRing®39.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Up to ~92 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day3.8
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day4.7
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day2.6
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day2.6
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day1.2
NuvaRing®1.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Venous or Arterial Thrombotic/Thromboembolic Events

Venous or arterial thrombotic/thrombo-embolic events, (VTEs or ATEs) (e.g., deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident) were assessed. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 8 days after Day 28 of Cycle 3 (Up to ~92 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day0.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day0.0
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day0.0
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day0.0
NuvaRing®0.0

[back to top]

Intensity of Withdrawal Bleeding During Cycle 2

Intensity of withdrawal bleeding during Cycle 2 was defined as the ratio of the number of withdrawal bleeding days divided by the number of withdrawal bleeding and/or spotting days. Withdrawal bleeding and/or spotting is considered any bleeding or spotting episode that starts during or continues into the expected bleeding period (i.e., when the ring has been removed the last week of the cycle). Absence of withdrawal bleeding is no withdrawal bleeding and/or spotting episodes during an expected bleeding period when the ring has been removed. (NCT01709318)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 2 through Day 28 Cycle 2 (Up to ~28 days)

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 500/300 μg/Day0.87
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 700/300 μg/Day0.92
Nomegestrol Acetate-17β-Estradiol (NOMAC-E2) 900/300 μg/Day0.86
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 75/300 μg/Day0.90
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 100/300 μg/Day0.92
Etonogestrel-17β-Estradiol (ENG-E2) 125/300 μg/Day0.93
NuvaRing®0.95

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-35.5-36.1-35.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-20.3-19.620.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-3.70.0-2.7
Cohort 1: Placebo6.913.29.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-33.6-33.5-34.8
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-17.2-12.2-12.8
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.9-0.70.0
Cohort 2: Placebo6.71.43.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) Questionnaire

The NBUFSQ (8 items) is a brief patient-reported daily diary that assesses non-bleeding symptoms experienced by women with uterine fibroids. It includes 6 items, asking women to rate their symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, pressure, and cramping, back pain, bloating, and urinary problems) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric response scale that ranges from 0 (i.e., no symptom) to 10 (i.e., worst possible symptom) and 2 items to address urinary frequency during the daytime and at night. Data presented in the sum of scores to the 6 symptom questions, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (worst possible symptoms). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. Final Month is defined as the last 28 days prior to and including the last dose date of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1-28, Days 29-56, Days 57-84, Days 85-112, Days 113-140, Days 141-168, Final Month of treatment, Post-treatment (PT) Days 1-28, PT Days 29-56, PT Days 57-84, PT Days 85-112, PT Days 113-140, PT Days 141-168

,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-28Days 29-56Days 57-84Days 85-112Days 113-140Days 141-168Final MonthPT Days 1-28PT Days 29-56PT Days 57-84PT Days 85-112PT Days 113-140PT Days 141-168
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-3.4-5.8-7.2-7.8-7.6-8.0-6.7-5.2-4.1-4.0-6.4-3.1-8.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-3.1-4.4-4.1-5.2-5.3-5.1-4.1-3.8-1.0-2.1-4.81.34.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.4-2.9-3.2-3.7-3.4-3.3-3.5-3.00.0-1.10.71.4-3.3
Cohort 1: Placebo-3.3-4.5-5.6-7.0-4.1-6.8-5.3-5.6-5.7-5.4-4.43.47.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-2.7-4.2-4.5-5.1-5.5-5.9-4.0-3.8-2.8-2.0-2.4-17.3-3.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-2.1-2.2-2.2-3.6-4.0-4.4-3.3-2.0-2.7-1.6-3.0-5.6-3.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD0.0-2.3-3.8-4.1-5.3-4.8-2.3-2.3-2.5-3.9-5.0-7.0-6.4
Cohort 2: Placebo0.4-0.30.1-0.20.1-0.4-0.8-0.8-0.2-0.5-2.7-6.2-10.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 84 to 57 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, third last 28 days of treatment (last 84 to 57 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo19.67
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID96.43
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD89.47
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.31
Cohort 2: Placebo21.62
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD86.36
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD74.19
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD72.31

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥50% Reduction in MBL Volume from Baseline to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo26.56
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID91.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD85.25
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.03
Cohort 2: Placebo31.58
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD90.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD72.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD81.58

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 56 to 29 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, second last 28 days of treatment (last 56 to 29 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo11.29
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID94.83
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD88.14
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.00
Cohort 2: Placebo18.42
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD85.29
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD67.19
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD77.14

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

Percentage of participants with a >= 50% reduction from baseline in MBL to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo31.25
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID93.55
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD86.89
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD82.26
Cohort 2: Placebo35.53
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD90.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD79.45
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo1.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID75.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD52.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD43.3
Cohort 2: Placebo2.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD67.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD31.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD34.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month

Percentage of participants who achieved an MBL volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo32.81
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID91.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD88.52
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.03
Cohort 2: Placebo36.84
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD91.55
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD72.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Amenorrhea is defined as having 0 days of bleeding or spotting based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding or spotting, based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. Participants needed to have at least 66 days on treatment. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo1.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID56.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD33.3
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD28.3
Cohort 2: Placebo1.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD50.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD17.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.7

[back to top]

Mean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with heavy bleeding (either heavy or very heavy/gushing bleeding) was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Interventiondays (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-1.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-2.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.7
Cohort 2: Placebo-0.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-1.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with any bleeding including spotting was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Interventiondays (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-1.2
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-4.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-2.7
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.1
Cohort 2: Placebo-1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-3.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit

Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Interventiong/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo0.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD1.4
Cohort 2: Placebo0.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD1.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD1.2

[back to top]

Change in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month

The average bleeding score was calculated for each 28-day interval starting on Day 29 using data collected on daily bleeding diary using the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson (MVJ) Menstrual Bleeding Scale (1=spotting, 2 = very light bleeding, 3 = light bleeding, 4 = moderate bleeding, 5 = heavy bleeding, 6 = very heavy/gushing bleeding). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-0.3
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-0.7
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-0.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-0.1
Cohort 2: Placebo-0.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-0.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-0.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID67.370.569.8
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD46.247.950.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD23.426.227.5
Cohort 1: Placebo13.224.424.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD63.264.066.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD37.738.640.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.434.830.0
Cohort 2: Placebo10.914.513.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID79.675.073.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD50.054.257.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD31.940.541.2
Cohort 1: Placebo13.224.424.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD66.762.064.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD34.040.940.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.434.830.0
Cohort 2: Placebo9.418.216.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID73.178.773.2
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD42.958.058.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD18.531.926.8
Cohort 1: Placebo5.22.03.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD57.162.563.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD36.832.729.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD17.526.023.4
Cohort 2: Placebo1.41.61.4

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume, as measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-30.9-35.6-31.5
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-19.4-21.9-22.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-7.3-13.2-11.8
Cohort 1: Placebo7.317.515.9
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-24.7-26.00-26.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-15.7-13.5-11.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-6.1-9.0-6.7
Cohort 2: Placebo8.410.711.6

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-41.9-40.2-39.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-24.6-23.3-24.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-9.8-8.8-12.9
Cohort 1: Placebo1.78.34.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-34.4-34.2-36.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-17.5-17.8-16.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-4.6-1.1-1.6
Cohort 2: Placebo5.4-1.80.1

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9558
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9464
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9050
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9773
Placebo5532

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg3917
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg247
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg309
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg3615
Placebo214

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg6122
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg4914
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg5015
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg6333
Placebo336

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7333
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg6228
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg6524
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8044
Placebo356

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8237
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg7234
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg6927
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8648
Placebo4713

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8343
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg7839
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7639
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9261
Placebo5216

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9547
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8746
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8144
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9363
Placebo4916

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9351
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8553
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9045
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9864
Placebo5420

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9456
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9563
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9154
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9569
Placebo5822

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg255
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg174
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg154
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg153
Placebo161

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10164
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10269
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10062
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9578
Placebo6837

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10468
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10574
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9765
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9579
Placebo5934

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9968
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10475
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9466
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9884
Placebo6737

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg4920
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg3512
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg3415
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg4421
Placebo356

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7129
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg5924
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg5421
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg6838
Placebo4215

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8145
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg7034
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7432
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8255
Placebo4115

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9054
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8047
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7438
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9355
Placebo5527

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9556
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg8551
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8247
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9868
Placebo5530

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10158
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9363
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg8856
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9671
Placebo5832

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10062
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9864
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9059
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10278
Placebo6037

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10163
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10773
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9263
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9872
Placebo6335

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 5 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg224
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg265
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg278
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg253
Placebo86

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-55.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-53.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-50.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-52.4
Placebo-40.2

[back to top]

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-40.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-35.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-33.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-38.9
Placebo-26.4

[back to top]

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.12
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.90
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.76
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.71
Placebo-0.56

[back to top]

Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.48
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.51
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.40
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.44
Placebo-0.34

[back to top]

Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia

Endometrial biopsies centrally evaluated by 3 primary pathologists using criteria described in Blaustein's Pathology text. Pathologists classified biopsy into 1 of following 3 categories: Cat.1: Non-endometrial malignancy/non-hyperplasia; Cat.2: Endometrial hyperplasia; Cat.3: Endometrial malignancy. Consensus was reached when the 2 of 3 pathologist readers agreed on any of the above categories; if all three reads were disparate, the final diagnosis was based on the most severe diagnosis. Incidence rate calculated as: I=A/B where I=incidence rate at M12 evaluation, A=all new subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia during study but post-Baseline, B=all subjects with biopsies following M11 meeting the criteria specified plus all subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia by any of the pathologists before M11. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-12.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-12.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.7
Placebo-12.2

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-58.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-56.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-53.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-55.7
Placebo-38.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-58.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-57.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-54.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-56.1
Placebo-38.4

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-60.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-58.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-54.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-57.0
Placebo-41.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-28.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-22.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-21.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-27.8
Placebo-21.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-37.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-30.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-31.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-35.6
Placebo-25.8

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-44.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-37.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-35.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-41.5
Placebo-26.8

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-49.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-42.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-40.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-46.8
Placebo-33.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-53.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-44.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-43.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-49.4
Placebo-34.1

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-56.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-48.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-47.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-51.5
Placebo-33.4

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-57.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-50.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-49.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-52.4
Placebo-36.9

[back to top]

Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-57.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-54.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-52.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-54.5
Placebo-38.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-12.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-11.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-11.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-16.3
Placebo-13.0

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-53.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-51.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-49.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-50.6
Placebo-37.1

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-53.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-52.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-49.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-50.9
Placebo-36.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-55.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-53.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-50.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-52.4
Placebo-40.2

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-26.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-21.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-25.4
Placebo-21.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-34.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-29.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-28.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-33.6
Placebo-25.1

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-40.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-35.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-33.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-38.9
Placebo-26.4

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-45.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-39.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-37.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-43.5
Placebo-31.6

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-49.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-41.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-40.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-45.5
Placebo-32.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-51.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-45.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-43.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-47.7
Placebo-33.4

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-52.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-46.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-45.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-48.4
Placebo-36.0

[back to top]

Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-52.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-50.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-47.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-50.1
Placebo-36.4

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg17.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg13.7
Placebo10.0

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg12.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg12.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg14.1
Placebo10.0

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg13.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg15.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg14.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg15.2
Placebo9.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg10.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg11.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg11.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg14.5
Placebo9.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg12.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg11.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg17.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg10.7
Placebo11.3

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg11.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg11.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg11.9
Placebo11.3

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-20.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-22.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-26.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-26.1
Placebo-14.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-20.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-19.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.7
Placebo-14.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-23.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-21.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-26.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-22.4
Placebo-15.4

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-22.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-20.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-20.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.4
Placebo-15.4

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-21.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-18.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-18.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.3
Placebo-14.9

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-22.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-17.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-23.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.3
Placebo-15.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-18.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-16.1
Placebo-9.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-12.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.0
Placebo-9.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-16.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-18.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-15.7
Placebo-9.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-12.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.8
Placebo-9.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-11.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.5
Placebo-9.9

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-11.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.8
Placebo-9.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-20.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.4
Placebo-10.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-15.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-15.1
Placebo-10.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-17.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-16.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.0
Placebo-11.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-16.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-18.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.4
Placebo-11.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.4
Placebo-11.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-8.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-7.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-10.8
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-6.5
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-9.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-5.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-11.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.3
Placebo-2.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-5.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-5.7
Placebo-2.1

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-7.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.9
Placebo-3.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-6.3
Placebo-3.4

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-8.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-11.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.4
Placebo-6.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-8.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-9.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-9.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-9.4
Placebo-6.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-10.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-10.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-12.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-10.5
Placebo-9.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-9.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-8.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-9.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-8.7
Placebo-9.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-11.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-9.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-10.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-10.8
Placebo-8.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-9.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-8.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-8.9
Placebo-8.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-10.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-6.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-8.0
Placebo-4.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-7.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-5.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-4.5
Placebo-4.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-5.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-8.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-6.1
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-2.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-6.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-6.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.7
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-7.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-5.7
Placebo-5.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0=best possible & 100=worst possible. MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-2.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-4.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.4
Placebo-5.6

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 1

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.4
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 6 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 6 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Week 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT)

Change from Baseline (BL) to Wk 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionProportion of Net Change (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.8
Placebo-11.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-20.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-17.6
Placebo-10.3

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-15.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-15.3
Placebo-10.3

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-17.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-16.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-19.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-16.6
Placebo-11.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-14.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.6
Placebo-11.7

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-16.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-18.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-14.6
Placebo-11.5

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT)

"Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0=best possible & 100=worst possible as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-15.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-13.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-13.3
Placebo-11.5

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-2.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-2.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Placebo-1.5

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT)

"Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.6
Placebo-1.5

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-2.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-2.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Placebo-1.6

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT)

"Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-2.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Placebo-1.6

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Placebo-1.4

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT)

"Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.6
Placebo-1.4

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.4
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.2
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.6
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.4
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.3
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.7
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.4
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-1.5
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-4.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.4
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.3
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-4.0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.5
Placebo-3.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-4.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.3
Placebo-3.0

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.2
Placebo-2.2

[back to top]

Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)

"Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being not at all bothered and 8 being extremely bothered." (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-3.1
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-3.1
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-2.9
Placebo-2.2

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 2

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.4
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 3

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.1
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 4

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.2
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.0
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 1

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg3.0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg1.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg1.3
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.8
Placebo0.6

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 2

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg2.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg1.5
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.7
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 3

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg2.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.7
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.3
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 4

InterventionDays (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg1.9
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0.5
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.8
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0.3
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 1 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 1 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg156
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg202
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg207
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg196
Placebo71

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 10 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 10 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 10 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg222
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg271
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg273
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg248
Placebo85

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 11 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 11 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 11 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg231
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg275
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg277
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg249
Placebo85

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 12 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 12 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 12 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg238
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg278
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg278
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg252
Placebo86

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 2 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 2 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg166
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg220
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg215
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg212
Placebo74

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 3 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 3 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg174
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg227
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg225
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg218
Placebo77

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 4 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 4 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 4 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg177
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg236
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg233
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg229
Placebo80

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 5 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 5 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 5 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg183
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg244
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg240
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg234
Placebo80

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 6 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 6 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg186
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg250
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg249
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg236
Placebo80

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 7 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 7 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 7 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg200
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg253
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg255
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg238
Placebo82

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 8 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 8 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 8 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg209
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg262
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg262
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg242
Placebo84

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 9 to 13

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 9 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 9 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg214
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg267
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg266
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg246
Placebo84

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From the 13th Cycle

Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from the 13th Cycle was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: The 13th Cycle

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg249
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg282
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg283
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg254
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg204
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg251
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg263
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg239
Placebo82

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 10 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg248
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg281
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg292
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg261
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 11 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg251
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg284
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg294
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg261
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 12 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg260
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg284
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg295
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg260
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg209
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg256
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg265
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg244
Placebo84

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg214
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg258
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg267
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg246
Placebo85

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 4 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg217
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg261
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg273
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg253
Placebo86

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg227
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg268
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg280
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg256
Placebo86

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 7 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg237
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg271
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg282
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg256
Placebo87

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 8 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg242
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg276
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg285
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg258
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Cycle 9 to 13

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg245
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg279
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg288
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg259
Placebo88

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles

No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: The 13th Cycle

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg268
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg287
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg296
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg261
Placebo89

[back to top]

Primary Safety Endpoint: Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia

Endometrial biopsies centrally evaluated by 2 primary pathologists using criteria from Blaustein's Pathology text. Pathologists classified bx into 1 of following 3 categories: Cat.1: Non-endometrial malignancy/non-hyperplasia; Cat.2: Endometrial hyperplasia; Cat.3: Endometrial malignancy. Consensus reached when 2 primary pathologist agreed on any of above categories; if primary pathologists disagreed on presence of hyperplasia, result of 3rd pathologist was utilized and final decision regarding presence of hyperplasia was based on diagnosis of majority. If all 3 reads disparate, final diagnosis based on most severe dx. Incidence rate calculated as: I=A/B where I=incidence rate at M12 evaluation, A=all new subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia during study but post-Baseline, B=all subjects w/biopsies following M11 meeting criteria specified plus all subjects w/biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia by any pathologists before M11. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.06
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.05
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.02
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.08
Placebo-0.07

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.87
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.58
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.57
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.45
Placebo-0.35

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.86
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.67
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.56
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.50
Placebo-0.36

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.94
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.71
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.54
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.54
Placebo-0.39

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.16
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.14
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.06
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.12
Placebo-0.11

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.25
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.24
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.11
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.20
Placebo-0.15

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.31
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.31
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.19
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.27
Placebo-0.17

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.46
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.37
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.23
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.36
Placebo-0.24

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.62
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.42
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.33
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.46
Placebo-0.27

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.65
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.50
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.42
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.47
Placebo-0.27

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.70
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.51
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.44
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.47
Placebo-0.33

[back to top]

Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.78
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.55
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.51
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.54
Placebo-0.31

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.24
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.25
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.23
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.25
Placebo-0.25

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.05
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.77
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.78
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.62
Placebo-0.53

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.04
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.86
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.78
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.68
Placebo-0.54

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-1.12
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.90
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.76
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.71
Placebo-0.56

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.34
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.34
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.27
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.29
Placebo-0.28

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.43
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.44
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.32
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.37
Placebo-0.32

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.48
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.51
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.40
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.44
Placebo-0.34

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.64
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.56
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.44
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.53
Placebo-0.42

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.80
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.61
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.54
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.63
Placebo-0.45

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.81
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.69
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.63
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.64
Placebo-0.44

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.88
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.70
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.65
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.64
Placebo-0.51

[back to top]

Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.96
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-0.74
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.73
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-0.71
Placebo-0.48

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg48
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg29
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg25
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg24
Placebo4

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg45
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg23
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg19
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg5
Placebo2

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg25
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg21
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg16
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg7
Placebo1

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg27
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg16
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg5
Placebo2

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg90
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg74
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg68
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg58
Placebo10

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg76
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg40
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg48
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg24
Placebo4

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg54
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg33
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg29
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg18
Placebo2

[back to top]

Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)

Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Trimester 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg47
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg21
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg27
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg18
Placebo4

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 12. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg1012414
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg97297
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg102227
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg101175
Placebo622628

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 4. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg755122
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg714921
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg724923
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg863713
Placebo414935

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 8. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg933513
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg1032412
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg982313
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg101236
Placebo622530

[back to top]

Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-59.9-40.6-8.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-60.0-34.9-38.8
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-58.2-28.8-8.6
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-58.8-35.9-30.7
Placebo-56.2-35.7-9.2

[back to top]

Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,,,,
Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-55.7-28.9-5.3
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-48.6-25.9-6.6
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-46.2-29.2-2.7
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-52.5-24.1-6.5
Placebo-47.0-26.8-5.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)

Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,,,,
Interventionweekly hot flushes (Mean)
(Very) Much ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo Change or Worse
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-57.8-36.8-7.4
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-55.1-27.3-15.2
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg-55.4-27.2-1.6
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg-60.8-28.7-0.2
Placebo-52.6-27.0-7.1

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg194
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg102
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg121
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg142
Placebo101

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 10

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9357
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9460
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9257
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9373
Placebo5423

[back to top]

Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 - (MITT-VMS)

Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. (NCT01942668)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 11

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=50% Reduction>=75% Reduction
Combined Estradiol 0.25 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9562
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9764
Combined Estradiol 0.5 mg / Progesterone 50 mg9452
Combined Estradiol 1 mg / Progesterone 100 mg9471
Placebo5526

[back to top]

Putamen Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment

"Putamen reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups at pre-treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (visit 3)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed.015
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.004

[back to top]

Change in Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Dysphoria Scores

"The Dysphoria Scale of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) will be used to assess the change in depressive symptom severity. The IDAS Dysphoria Scale consists of 10 items and uses a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating not at all and 5 indicating extremely. As such, the range of possible scores is 10 to 50. The Dysphoria scale includes items assessing feelings of depression, inadequacy, psychomotor agitation, guilt, discouragement, anhedonia, poor concentration, difficulty with decision-making, psychomotor retardation, and worry. Higher scores indicate worse depression symptoms." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Assessed at pre- and post-treatment (visits 3 and 6)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed, Baseline24.56
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed, Baseline13.79
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed, Following Estradiol Treatment15.25
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed, Following Estradiol11.84

[back to top]

Caudate Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.

"Caudate reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups following treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Post-treatment (visit 6)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed.005
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.026

[back to top]

Caudate Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment

"Caudate reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups at pre-treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (visit 3)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed.027
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.043

[back to top]

Response Latency to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment

"Time (ms) between stimulus and response will be measured during reward trials of the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task. During MID the task, participants need to select the correct response during win and lose conditions by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Post-treatment (visit 6)

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed190.68
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed193.43

[back to top]

Response Latency to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment

"Time (ms) between stimulus and response will be measured during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task during the win trials. During MID the task, participants need to select the correct response during win and lose conditions by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (visit 3)

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed204.17
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed209.63

[back to top]

Putamen Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.

"Putamen reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups following treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Post-treatment (visit 6)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed-.030
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.032

[back to top]

Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task Following Estradiol Treatment.

"Nucleus accumbens (NAcc) reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups following treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Post-treatment (visit 6)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed.040
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.059

[back to top]

Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) Signal Intensity in Response to Reward During the MID fMRI Task at Pre-treatment

"Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) reactivity to reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task was measured between the two groups. During MID the task, participants respond to win trials by pressing a button on a button box in the MRI as quickly as possible when the see a target. Reactivity is measured by examining participant's change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) (i.e., measurement of oxygen level that is carried to neurons by red blood cells since areas of the brain that are thought to be more active or involved in certain tasks require more oxygen) in response to a stimulus of interest (win trials) versus non-stimulus (non-win trials). Percent signal change in BOLD activation between monetary reward versus non-reward is the outcome of interest. Percent signal change is then compared between the two groups at pre-treatment." (NCT02255175)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (visit 3)

Interventionpercent signal change (Mean)
Perimenopausal Women, Depressed.045
Perimenopausal Women, Non-depressed.052

[back to top]

Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 12

"Primary Efficacy Endpoint was the percentage of patients failing to maintain castrate levels of T (T < 50 ng/dL).~Testosterone suppression, defined as the absence of any T level measurement over 50 ng/dL during Weeks 4 to 12." (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BHR-200 Low Dose3
BHR-200 Mid Dose3
BHR-200 High Dose5
Placebo2

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

Serum concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: To Week 52/End of Study: Both 24-Week Main Study and Optional 28-Week Extension Study

Interventionng/ML (Mean)
Baseline PSAWeek 4 PSAWeek 8 PSAWeek 12 PSAWeek 16 PSA
Placebo0.3340.4810.8701.3950.090

[back to top]

Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)

Serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Baseline FSHWeek 12 FSH
Placebo5.7009.450

[back to top]

Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)

Serum concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Baseline SHBGWeek 12 SHBGWeek 24 SHBGWeek 36 SHBGWeek 48 SHBG
BHR-200 High Dose45.855.271.347.058.0
BHR-200 Low Dose49.748.750.337.046.0
BHR-200 Mid Dose52.855.752.053.542.5

[back to top]

Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)

Serum concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Baseline SHBGWeek 12 SHBG
Placebo48.827.0

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

Serum concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: To Week 52/End of Study: Both 24-Week Main Study and Optional 28-Week Extension Study

,,
Interventionng/ML (Mean)
Baseline PSAWeek 4 PSAWeek 8 PSAWeek 12 PSAWeek 16 PSAWeek 20 PSAWeek 24 PSAWeek 28 PSAWeek 32 PSAWeek 36 PSAWeek 40 PSAWeek 44 PSAWeek 48 PSAWeek 52 PSA
BHR-200 High Dose8.0585.1704.9954.3806.9605.3454.7454.8634.5637.0507.80012.60012.80013.300
BHR-200 Low Dose0.3740.4590.5450.3300.2970.3300.3630.4300.4630.6500.7500.5000.7000.700
BHR-200 Mid Dose0.9211.4831.1450.2270.1600.1270.1450.0900.1450.1450.1450.1450.1450.145

[back to top]

Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

,,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Baseline LHWeek 12 LHWeek 24 LHWeek 36 LHWeek 48 LH
BHR-200 High Dose0.1901.5970.3933.7500.300
BHR-200 Low Dose0.3800.2270.9970.6450.600
BHR-200 Mid Dose0.4700.5270.3950.3450.300

[back to top]

Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Baseline LHWeek 12 LH
Placebo0.5302.050

[back to top]

Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)

Serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Reported for Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

,,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Baseline FSHWeek 12 FSHWeek 24 FSHWeek 36 FSHWeek 48 FSH
BHR-200 High Dose3.9633.8480.84810.6001.500
BHR-200 Low Dose4.4780.6301.6002.0502.00
BHR-200 Mid Dose5.2250.4930.7951.0950.795

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reporting Thromboembolic Adverse Events

Number of patients and severity of thromboembolic adverse events (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: To Week 52/End of Study: Both 24-Week Main Study and Optional 28-Week Extension Study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BHR-200 Low Dose0
BHR-200 Mid Dose0
BHR-200 High Dose0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 52/ End of Study

Proportion of patients failing to maintain castrate levels of T (T < 50 ng/dL). Testosterone suppression, defined as the absence of any T level measurement over 50 ng/dL during Weeks 24 to 52/End of Study (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Double-blind 28-Week Optional Extension Study from Week 24 to Week 52/End of Study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BHR-200 Low Dose1
BHR-200 Mid Dose2
BHR-200 High Dose2
Placebo0

[back to top]

Maintenance of Testosterone Suppression at Week 24

Pproportion of patients failing to maintaincastrate levels of T (T < 50 ng/dL). Testosterone suppression, defined as the absence of any T level measurement over 50 ng/dL during Weeks 4 to 24. (NCT02349386)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BHR-200 Low Dose3
BHR-200 Mid Dose2
BHR-200 High Dose3
Placebo0

[back to top]

Matsuda Index- Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index

"Matsuda index is calculated from the standard 2h Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and corresponding insulin values.~Matsuda index = 10,000/square root of [fasting glucose x fasting insulin] x [mean glucose x mean insulin during OGTT]) The Matsuda index is correlated (r = 0.73) with the rate of whole-body glucose disposal during the euglycemic insulin clamp.~Matsuda index <2.5 is considered insulin resistant, higher values indicate less insulin resistance. A decrease in matsuda index over the study period would indicate decreased insulin sensitivity." (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: We calculated the change in Matsuda index from baseline to 9 weeks.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin-1.02
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.10
Progestin-Only-1.45

[back to top]

D-dimer

Markers of coagulation activation (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin12.6
Natural Estrogen + Progestin2.4
Progestin-Only-1.6

[back to top]

Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH)

Change in Serum concentrations of anti-mullerian hormone reflecting ovarian reserve from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin-0.8
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.4
Progestin-Only0.07

[back to top]

F1+2

Change in plasma concentrations of F1+2 a marker of coagulation activation (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin24.1
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-5.5
Progestin-Only-8.5

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

Change in concentrations of total cholesterol from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin0.10
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.16
Progestin-Only0.11

[back to top]

Triglyceride

Change in triglyceride concentrations from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin0.45
Natural Estrogen + Progestin0.18
Progestin-Only0.06

[back to top]

Thrombin Generation, ETP Endogenous Thrombin Potential

Change from baseline in thrombin generation, measured by thrombin generation assay-Calibrated automated thrombogram (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin63.9
Natural Estrogen + Progestin26.4
Progestin-Only7.1

[back to top]

Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL)

Change in concentration of Low-Density Lipoprotein LDL from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin-0.16
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.14
Progestin-Only0.01

[back to top]

High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein

Change in plasma concentrations of acute phase protein 'C reactive protein' (CRP), a marker of chronic inflammation. (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin1.10
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.06
Progestin-Only0.13

[back to top]

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL)

Change in concentration of High-Density Lipoprotein HDL from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin0.20
Natural Estrogen + Progestin-0.02
Progestin-Only-0.02

[back to top]

Fasting Insulin

Mean change in fasting serum insulin from baseline to nine weeks (NCT02352090)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 weeks

InterventionmU/l (Mean)
Synthetic Estrogen + Progestin1.4
Natural Estrogen + Progestin1.02
Progestin-Only1.99

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity

Total number (N=10) of participants analyzed within each treatment group who were sexually active at both Baseline and Day 15 and provided a response at both visits. (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bleeding/ No Bleeding (Success)Bleeding/ Bleeding (Failure)No Bleeding/ Bleeding (Failure)No Bleeding/ No Bleeding (No Change)
Placebo1315
TX-12-004-HR 10μg2008

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Intermediate Cells)

(NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

InterventionPercentage of Intermediate Cells (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg18.7
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness)

Outcome was measured by using a severity scale. No Atrophy has rogation and elasticity of vault(0). Mild atrophy has poor rogation with some elasticity noted of vaginal vault(1). Moderate atrophy is smooth, some elasticity of vaginal vault(2). Severe atrophy is smooth, no elasticity, constriction of the upper one third of vagina or loss of vaginal tone (cystocele and rectocele)(3). (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment 1-0.034
Treatment 2-0.133

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Epithelial Integrity)

Outcome was measured by using a severity scale. No Atrophy=normal(0). Mild atrophy=vaginal surface bleeds with scraping(1). Moderate atrophy=vaginal surface bleeds with light contact(2). Severe atrophy=vaginal surface has petechiae before contact and bleeds with light contact(3). (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-0.342
Placebo0.176

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Parabasal Cells)

(NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

InterventionPercentage of Parabasal Cells (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-54.4
Placebo-4.8

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Secretions)

Outcome was measured by using a severity scale. No Atrophy has normal clear secretions noted on vaginal walls(0). Mild atrophy has superficial coating of secretions, difficulty with speculum insertion(1). Moderate atrophy is scant not covering the entire vaginal vault, may need lubrication with speculum insertion to prevent pain(2). Severe atrophy has none, inflamed, ulceration noted, need lubrication with speculum insertion to prevent pain(3). (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-0.643
Placebo-0.274

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator Assessment of the Vaginal Mucosa (Assessment of Vaginal Color)

Outcome was measured by using a severity scale. No Atrophy is pink in color (0). Mild atrophy is lighter in color (1). Moderate atrophy is pale in color (2). Severe atrophy is transparent, either no color or inflamed (3). (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-0.199
Placebo-0.009

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Maturation Index of the Vaginal Cell Type (Superficial Cells)

(NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

InterventionPercentage of Superficial Cells (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg35.2
Placebo8.8

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) Symptom

The severity of the most bothersome VVA symptom was self-assessed by each subject using a VVA questionnaire. The questionnaire has a 4-point scoring scale with: None=0, Mild=1, Moderate=2, and Severe=3. The lower the score, the least bothersome it is to the subject. (NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-1.043
Placebo-1.042

[back to top]

Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Vaginal pH

(NCT02449902)
Timeframe: Baseline to 15 days post-treatment

InterventionpH (Least Squares Mean)
TX-12-004-HR 10μg-0.97
Placebo-0.34

[back to top]

Number of In-Treatment Pregnancies Per 100 Woman-Years of Exposure in Participants 18-35 Years of Age (Pearl Index)

The Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure for this study was contraceptive efficacy, or the prevention of in-treatment pregnancy. The total incidence of in-treatment pregnancies was expressed as the Pearl Index, which is defined as the number of in-treatment pregnancies per 100 woman-years of exposure (one woman-year defined as a period of 365.25 days). NOTE: Due to early termination of this study, the ENG-E2 reporting group received only up to 10 cycles of treatment, and the LNG-EE reporting group received only up to 9 cycles of treatment. (NCT02616146)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year (13 28-day cycles)

InterventionPregnancies per 100 woman years (Number)
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg1.54
LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg2.93

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. NOTE: Due to early termination of this study, the ENG-E2 reporting group received only up to 10 cycles of treatment, and the LNG-EE reporting group received only up to 9 cycles of treatment. (NCT02616146)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg61
LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg23

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. NOTE: Due to early termination of this study, the ENG-E2 reporting group received only up to 10 cycles of treatment, and the LNG-EE reporting group received only up to 9 cycles of treatment. (NCT02616146)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg530
LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg140

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Absence of Withdrawal Bleeding (AWB), by Cycle

Participants were asked to keep a daily diary to record vaginal bleeding events. AWB was defined as no bleeding/spotting during the expected bleeding period. NOTE: Due to early termination of this study, the ENG-E2 reporting group received only up to 10 cycles of treatment, and the LNG-EE reporting group received only up to 9 cycles of treatment. (NCT02616146)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg7634261733000
LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg151010601210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Breakthrough Bleeding/Spotting (BTB-S), by Cycle

BTB-S was considered any bleeding/spotting that occurred during expected non-bleeding interval that was neither early nor continued withdrawal bleeding. BTB-S was classified as follows: Bleeding = any bloody vaginal discharge that required one or more sanitary pads or tampons per day; Spotting = any bloody vaginal discharge that required no sanitary pads or tampons per day. NOTE: Due to early termination of this study, the ENG-E2 reporting group received only up to 10 cycles of treatment, and the LNG-EE reporting group received only up to 9 cycles of treatment. (NCT02616146)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg1661127942291381
LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg543620138720

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.1
Elagolix65.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA61.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month

"Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.4
Elagolix84.0
Elagolix + E2/NETA56.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder

"Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions:~Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume < 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day, which is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period [last treatment visit date] or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date), and~≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month.~Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids, or adverse events were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.7
Elagolix84.1
Elagolix + E2/NETA68.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-19.0
Elagolix-209.0
Elagolix + Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate-135.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.1
Elagolix-234.7
Elagolix + E2/NETA-192.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.3
Elagolix-236.2
Elagolix + E2/NETA-194.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month

"Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.8
Elagolix-221.5
Elagolix + E2/NETA-176.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of study treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. (NCT02668783)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 128 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of study treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented. (NCT02668783)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 158 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg1
Placebo2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder

"Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions:~Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume < 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day, which is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date), and~≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month.~Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids, or adverse events were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo10.5
Elagolix76.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA76.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month

"Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.7
Elagolix88.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA61.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.1
Elagolix-196.6
Elagolix + E2/NETA-127.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.2
Elagolix-211.1
Elagolix + E2/NETA-200.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo28.5
Elagolix-223.7
Elagolix + E2/NETA-198.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month

"Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.3
Elagolix-198.8
Elagolix + E2/NETA-168.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6

(NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.8
Elagolix40.0
Elagolix + E2/NETA50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Identified as Responders

A responder is a subject meeting specific vaginal cytology criteria AND a vaginal pH < 5.0 with a change from Visit 1 of at least 0.5. (NCT02770365)
Timeframe: Day 8

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Test Product36.8
Reference Product32.0
Placebo Product0.8

[back to top]

Most Bothersome Symptom

Percentage of subjects based on the improvement (change from Visit 2) of the Most Bothersome Symptom at Visit 3. (NCT02770365)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Test Product116
Reference Product123

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.6
Placebo (Group C)-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.5
Placebo (Group C)-0.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline In Hemoglobin For Women With a Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline

"LS means and p-value for test of difference is relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)20.8
Placebo (Group C)10.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume

"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-12.9
Placebo (Group C)2.2

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)14.8
Placebo (Group C)9.4

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported CI based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson).~As per the objective of the study, this secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)10.94
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)36.36

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA

"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)73.4
Placebo (Group C)18.9

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24

"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)50.0
Placebo (Group C)21.74

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at Baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)43.10
Placebo (Group C)10.14

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (eDiary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with eDiary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)52.34
Placebo (Group C)5.51

[back to top]

Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)48.34

[back to top]

Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)67
Placebo (Group C)7

[back to top]

Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)5.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

[back to top]

Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)11.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

[back to top]

Time To MBL Response

"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method. MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.3
Placebo (Group C)25.1

[back to top]

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In The PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)2 Category improvement (-2)3 Category improvement (-3)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)281415
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1429228

[back to top] [back to top]

Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And Norethindrone (NET) In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics.~As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
RelugolixNET
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)2.130.33

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck

"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4)Total HipFemoral Neck
Placebo (Group C)0.0520.5490.307
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.3560.023-0.262

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume

"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-12.4
Placebo (Group C)-0.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume

MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-84.3
Placebo (Group C)-23.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), As Assessed By DXA

"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.470
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)-1.995

[back to top]

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)78
Placebo (Group C)45

[back to top]

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"A Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)79
Placebo (Group C)35

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)34
Placebo (Group C)17

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)15
Placebo (Group C)5

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)42
Placebo (Group C)27

[back to top]

Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)33
Placebo (Group C)11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-30.9
Placebo (Group C)-10.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most patients (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-45.0
Placebo (Group C)-16.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.05
Placebo (Group C)3.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.90
Placebo (Group C)3.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-6.25
Placebo (Group C)0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.95
Placebo (Group C)51.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)

"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5). raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)] * 100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the study objective, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only these two arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-45.0
Placebo (Group C)-16.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)45.8
Placebo (Group C)15.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)44.4
Placebo (Group C)14.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.9
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.7
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.1
Placebo (Group C)-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.1
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of Estradiol In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group

"Blood samples for determination of serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.95

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume

"MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. Least square (LS) means for test of difference is Relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-84.3
Placebo (Group C)-15.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.4
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire

"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.7
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group

"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.30

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Hemoglobin For Women With A Hemoglobin Concentration ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)24.3
Placebo (Group C)4.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4) As Assessed By DXA

"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.819
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)-1.919

[back to top]

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)78
Placebo (Group C)42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.30
Placebo (Group C)39.85

[back to top]

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease in UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)79
Placebo (Group C)37

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)35
Placebo (Group C)18

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)48
Placebo (Group C)34

[back to top]

Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)34
Placebo (Group C)17

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in UFS-QoL Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most participants (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-51.7
Placebo (Group C)-18.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)0.12
Placebo (Group C)3.48

[back to top]

Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And NET In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
RelugolixNET
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1.960.28

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck As Assessed By DXA

"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck (same leg across participants) at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects. For Relugolix plus E2/NETA Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4), number (n)=95.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only rel" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)Total HipFemoral Neck
Placebo (Group C)0.315-0.0440.019
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.126-0.173-0.684

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-3.10
Placebo (Group C)3.04

[back to top] [back to top]

Time To MBL Response

"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.4
Placebo (Group C)27.1

[back to top]

Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)16.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

[back to top]

Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.9
Placebo (Group C)NA

[back to top]

Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)63
Placebo (Group C)4

[back to top]

Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)45.34

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (e-Diary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with e-Diary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)50.40
Placebo (Group C)3.10

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)47.06
Placebo (Group C)17.07

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24

"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)61.29
Placebo (Group C)5.41

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA

"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)71.2
Placebo (Group C)14.73

[back to top]

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)3 Category improvement (-3)2 Category improvement (-2)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)218182
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)7222910

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)19
Placebo (Group C)2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)

"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5), raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)]*100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-51.7
Placebo (Group C)-18.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of time, most of the time and all of the time.) Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-36.1
Placebo (Group C)-13.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good). LS means and p-value for test of difference was relugolix plus E2/NETA minus placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)44.4
Placebo (Group C)16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)43.6
Placebo (Group C)17.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-5.47
Placebo (Group C)-0.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire

"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)6.3
Placebo (Group C)3.9

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12

An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term. Reported confidence interval (CI) based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson). As per the objective of the study, the secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)5.56
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)35.71

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume

"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-13.8
Placebo (Group C)-1.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume

"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-17.4
Placebo (Group C)-7.4

[back to top]

Change in Median Dyspareunia Pain Scores After 4 Weeks Using Study Drug

Change in median dyspareunia pain scores between baseline and 4 weeks of use of nightly use of study medication. Pain will be assessed using 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. (NCT03240081)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
50mcg Estradiol Cream-1.5
100mcg Estradiol Cream-3

[back to top]

Change in Median Pain Scores for Intercourse After 12 Weeks Using Study Drug

Difference in median dyspareunia pain scores between arms for intercourse at 12 weeks after use of nightly study medication for 90d. Pain will be assessed using 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. (NCT03240081)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
50mcg Estradiol Cream-4
100mcg Estradiol Cream-5.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Identified as a Responder After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream and Estrace Vaginal Cream Groups

Treatment comparison of the number of participants in the PP population that were identified as responders at the end of the treatment period evaluated on Day 8 + 1 is presented. A responder was defined as a participant with at least a 25% reduction from baseline in the sum of percent basal/parabasal + percent intermediate cells on vaginal cytology and vaginal pH ≤5.0 with a change from baseline vaginal pH of at least 0.5. Any participant who withdrew from the study because of lack of efficacy was included as a non-responder. (NCT03294538)
Timeframe: Up to Day 9

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%49
Estrace Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%44

[back to top]

Number of Participants Identified as a Responder After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream, Estrace Vaginal Cream, and Vehicle Vaginal Cream Groups

Treatment comparison of the number of participants in the mITT population that were identified as responders at the end of the treatment period evaluated on Day 8 + 1 is presented. A responder was defined as a participant with at least a 25% reduction from baseline in the sum of percent basal/parabasal + percent intermediate cells on vaginal cytology and vaginal pH ≤5.0 with a change from baseline vaginal pH of at least 0.5. (NCT03294538)
Timeframe: Up to Day 9

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%53
Estrace Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%53
Vehicle Vaginal Cream0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Identified as Treatment Success After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream and Estrace Vaginal Cream Groups

The number of participants in the PP population that are identified as Treatment Success at the end of the treatment period evaluated on Day 8 ± 1 is presented. A Treatment Success is defined as a score of 0 or 1 at Day 8 ± 1 for the symptom identified at baseline as the most bothersome. This evaluation was based on participant self-assessed symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 = none and 3 = severe. The symptoms that were evaluated were vaginal dryness, vaginal/vulvar irritation/itching, dysuria, vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, and vaginal bleeding. Any participant who withdrew from the study because of lack of efficacy was included as a non-responder. (NCT03294538)
Timeframe: Up to Day 9

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%161
Estrace Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%153

[back to top]

Number of Participants Identified as Treatment Success After Completing Study Treatment in the Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream, Estrace Vaginal Cream, and Vehicle Vaginal Cream Groups

The number of participants in the mITT Population that are identified as Treatment Success at the end of the treatment period evaluated on Day 8 ± 1 is presented. A Treatment Success is defined as a score of 0 or 1 at Day 8 ± 1 for the symptom identified at baseline as the most bothersome. This evaluation is to be based on participant self-assessed symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 = none and 3 = severe. The symptoms that were evaluated were vaginal dryness, vaginal/vulvar irritation/itching, dysuria, vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, and vaginal bleeding. (NCT03294538)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Generic Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%175
Estrace Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01%169
Vehicle Vaginal Cream80

[back to top]

Readmission

The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the readmission rates. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
COVID related readmission numberNon-COVID related readmission number
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm00
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Each Cause of Death

The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28 and determine the cause of death. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the cause of death. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Death from COVID-19Death from bacteremia
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm00
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm01

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events Occurrence

Subjects will be followed daily for 7 days after initiation of treatment for serious adverse events. The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the frequency of serious adverse events in treatment arm vs. control arm. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm0
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Scores 1 or 2 on the 9-point World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale at Discharge, Measured up to Day 21

"The proportion will be calculated based on WHO ordinal scale for clinical improvement. The scale is from 0 to 8, with a higher score indicating worse clinical status.~Uninfected: No clinical or virological evidence of infection 0~Ambulatory: No limitation of activities 1 Limitation of activities 2~Hospitalized Mild Disease Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy 3 Oxygen by mask or nasal prongs 4~Hospitalized Severe Disease Non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen 5 Intubation and mechanical ventilation 6 Ventilation + additional organ support - 7 pressors, Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)~Dead Death 8" (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: At discharge, measured up to Day 21

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm5
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm4

[back to top]

Number of Days Death Occurred After Admission

The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28 and calculate number of deaths that occurred after admission. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the number of days death occurred after admission. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

InterventionDays (Number)
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm19

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the efficiency of treatment on length of hospital stay. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

InterventionDays (Mean)
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm7.2
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm10.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the number of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm0
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm1

[back to top]

Grade 3 Adverse Events Occurrence

Subjects will be followed daily for 7 days after initiation of treatment for adverse events. The investigators will review patients' medical records on day 14 and day 28. Then, the investigators will call patients on day 60. This will be done to determine the frequency and severity of adverse events in treatment arm vs. control arm. (NCT04865029)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 60

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Estradiol and Progesterone Arm0
Normal Saline and Folic Acid Arm0

[back to top]