Page last updated: 2024-11-12

ferric oxide, saccharated

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

Ferric Oxide, Saccharated: A glucaric acid-iron conjugate that is used in the treatment of IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA, including in patients with chronic kidney disease, when oral iron therapy is ineffective or impractical. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID91663255
MeSH IDM0051786

Synonyms (40)

Synonym
ferrum vitis
fz7nyf5n8l ,
fesin
ferosoft s
iron sucrose [usan:usp:ban]
ferum hausmann
colliron i.v.
nsc 27278
ferrum hausmann i.v.
ferplex ss
velphoro
encifer
unii-fz7nyf5n8l
venoferrum
fe-lib
ferijet
fe-back
succharated ferric oxide
saccharated ferric oxide
sucroferric oxyhydroxide
xi 921
iviron
saccharated iron oxide
saccharated iron
ferric saccharate ...iron oxide (mix.)
proferrin
neo-ferrum
einecs 232-464-7
succharated ferric oxide [usan:jan]
ferric oxide, saccharated
iron sugar
sucrofer
ferrivenin
iron oxide, saccharated
feojectin
hippiron
xi-921
iron oxide saccharated
DB09146
Q27888379

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" During the maintenance phase (period of epoetin therapy after correction of iron deficiency), the use of low-dose intravenous iron supplementation (10 to 20 mg per haemodialysis treatment or 100 mg every second week) avoids iron overtreatment and minimises potential adverse effects."( Safety aspects of parenteral iron in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Hörl, WH; Sunder-Plassmann, G, 1997
)
0.3
" We prospectively examined adverse events and vital signs after administering 100 mg of IV iron sucrose in each of 10 consecutive dialysis treatment sessions and compared results with those recorded in each of three consecutive dialysis sessions without iron treatment."( Safety and efficacy of iron sucrose in patients sensitive to iron dextran: North American clinical trial.
Adhikarla, R; Cavallo, G; Charytan, C; Gagnon, S; Levin, N; Spinowitz, BS; Van Wyck, DB, 2000
)
0.31
" This drug has been associated with occasional serious adverse reactions, including full-blown anaphylaxis."( The comparative safety of intravenous iron dextran, iron saccharate, and sodium ferric gluconate.
Fishbane, S; Kowalski, EA,
)
0.13
" We assessed safety by recording blood pressure and adverse events after iron sucrose injection and comparing results with those for the same patients during an observation control period."( Efficacy and safety of iron sucrose for iron deficiency in patients with dialysis-associated anemia: North American clinical trial.
Al-Saloum, M; Charytan, C; Gagnon, S; Hafeez, T; Levin, N; Van Wyck, DB, 2001
)
0.31
" Of the IV iron preparations available, iron sucrose has proved its efficacy and safety; however, there are no guidelines or systematic studies examining the optimum safe dosage regimen for this compound."( Intravenous iron sucrose: establishing a safe dose.
Chandler, G; Harchowal, J; Macdougall, IC, 2001
)
0.31
" None of patient discontinued the therapy due to any adverse effect."( Comparative study--efficacy, safety and compliance of intravenous iron sucrose and intramuscular iron sorbitol in iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy.
Mushtaq, A; Wali, A, 2002
)
0.31
"Administration of 250 mg SFGC over 1 hour is safe and well tolerated."( Chronic use of sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: safety of higher-dose (> or =250 mg) administration.
Agarwal, R; Coyne, DW; Dahl, N; Folkert, VW; Michael, B; Myirski, P; Warnock, DG, 2003
)
0.32
" Two patients had seven adverse events that were considered related to iron sucrose."( The safety and efficacy of an accelerated iron sucrose dosing regimen in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Avram, MM; Blaustein, DA; Chattopadhyay, J; Daoui, R; Gadh, R; Schwenk, MH; Singh, H, 2003
)
0.32
"An accelerated regimen of high-dose intravenous iron sucrose therapy in CKD patients is safe and effective in restoring iron stores, and may potentially save time and improve patient adherence."( The safety and efficacy of an accelerated iron sucrose dosing regimen in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Avram, MM; Blaustein, DA; Chattopadhyay, J; Daoui, R; Gadh, R; Schwenk, MH; Singh, H, 2003
)
0.32
"There were no serious adverse events related to iron sucrose therapy in the 130 patients intolerant to other iron preparations."( Safety of iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients intolerant to other parenteral iron products.
Al-Saloum, MM; Charytan, C; Schwenk, MH; Spinowitz, BS, 2004
)
0.32
"Iron sucrose therapy is safe and well tolerated in hemodialysis patients intolerant to iron dextran and/or sodium ferric gluconate."( Safety of iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients intolerant to other parenteral iron products.
Al-Saloum, MM; Charytan, C; Schwenk, MH; Spinowitz, BS, 2004
)
0.32
" Safety and tolerability of the therapy was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events under therapy and up to one week after completion of the study."( A study for the evaluation of safety and tolerability of intravenous high-dose iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding.
Blumenstein, I; Dignass, AU; Jahnel, J; Schröder, O; Schrott, M; Stein, J, 2004
)
0.32
"A total of 14 adverse events were observed in 10 patients, of which two adverse events in two patients were considered as being definitely related to drug administration."( A study for the evaluation of safety and tolerability of intravenous high-dose iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding.
Blumenstein, I; Dignass, AU; Jahnel, J; Schröder, O; Schrott, M; Stein, J, 2004
)
0.32
"A single intravenous high-dose iron sucrose therapy in patients with IDA due to gastrointestinal blood loss appears to be safe and therefore is a therapeutic option which may save time and improve patient compliance."( A study for the evaluation of safety and tolerability of intravenous high-dose iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding.
Blumenstein, I; Dignass, AU; Jahnel, J; Schröder, O; Schrott, M; Stein, J, 2004
)
0.32
" However, serious adverse events have been reported after single doses of some intravenous iron products."( Iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: safety of replacement and maintenance regimens.
Aronoff, GR; Bennett, WM; Blumenthal, S; Charytan, C; Pennell, JP; Reed, J; Rothstein, M; Strom, J; Van Wyck, D; Wolfe, A; Yee, J, 2004
)
0.32
" With each dosing regimen, adverse events, if any, were recorded and described."( Iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: safety of replacement and maintenance regimens.
Aronoff, GR; Bennett, WM; Blumenthal, S; Charytan, C; Pennell, JP; Reed, J; Rothstein, M; Strom, J; Van Wyck, D; Wolfe, A; Yee, J, 2004
)
0.32
" There were no serious or life-threatening drug-related adverse events."( Iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: safety of replacement and maintenance regimens.
Aronoff, GR; Bennett, WM; Blumenthal, S; Charytan, C; Pennell, JP; Reed, J; Rothstein, M; Strom, J; Van Wyck, D; Wolfe, A; Yee, J, 2004
)
0.32
"Iron sucrose is safe when given as treatment for iron deficiency or for maintenance of iron stores."( Iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: safety of replacement and maintenance regimens.
Aronoff, GR; Bennett, WM; Blumenthal, S; Charytan, C; Pennell, JP; Reed, J; Rothstein, M; Strom, J; Van Wyck, D; Wolfe, A; Yee, J, 2004
)
0.32
"We have not observed any adverse reactions upon iron administration."( [Safety and usefulness of parenteral iron in the management of anemia due to hip fracture in the elderly].
Cuenca Espiérrez, J; García Erce, JA; Martínez Martín, AA; Modrego Aranda, FJ; Solano, VM, 2004
)
0.32
"Parenteral administration of iron could be a safe and effective way to avoid or reduce allogeneic blood transfusions in THF patients."( [Safety and usefulness of parenteral iron in the management of anemia due to hip fracture in the elderly].
Cuenca Espiérrez, J; García Erce, JA; Martínez Martín, AA; Modrego Aranda, FJ; Solano, VM, 2004
)
0.32
"To define the adverse events following two different rates and methods of intravenous iron sucrose infusions in children with anaemia due to chronic renal impairment."( Low incidence of adverse events following 90-minute and 3-minute infusions of intravenous iron sucrose in children on erythropoietin.
Anbu, AT; Bradbury, MG; Kemp, T; O'donnell, K; Smith, PA, 2005
)
0.33
"Two prospective observational studies were undertaken to characterize the adverse events following iron sucrose administration in children with renal impairment and on erythropoietin."( Low incidence of adverse events following 90-minute and 3-minute infusions of intravenous iron sucrose in children on erythropoietin.
Anbu, AT; Bradbury, MG; Kemp, T; O'donnell, K; Smith, PA, 2005
)
0.33
" Sixty-five doses were administered over 3 min to 20 children, and six minor adverse events were documented."( Low incidence of adverse events following 90-minute and 3-minute infusions of intravenous iron sucrose in children on erythropoietin.
Anbu, AT; Bradbury, MG; Kemp, T; O'donnell, K; Smith, PA, 2005
)
0.33
"Although 90 min infusion is associated with fewer adverse events, no life-threatening events were documented in either method."( Low incidence of adverse events following 90-minute and 3-minute infusions of intravenous iron sucrose in children on erythropoietin.
Anbu, AT; Bradbury, MG; Kemp, T; O'donnell, K; Smith, PA, 2005
)
0.33
" Variables evaluated in the intent-to-treat population included adverse events (AEs), hemoglobin, and iron indices."( The safety of intravenous iron sucrose use in the elderly patient.
Charytan, C; Reed, J; Yee, J, 2007
)
0.34
"Serious adverse events that occur with the administration of iron dextran are due to the high molecular weight preparations."( Low-molecular weight iron dextran and iron sucrose have similar comparative safety profiles in chronic kidney disease.
Al Talib, K; Auerbach, M, 2008
)
0.35
"To describe the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a group of children with iron deficiency anemia who did not respond to oral iron therapy."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a group of children with iron deficiency anemia.
Kapelushnik, J; Levy, J; Moser, A; Pinsk, V; Yerushalmi, B, 2008
)
0.35
" One patient demonstrated a severe side effect with temporary and reversible reduced blood pressure during treatment."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a group of children with iron deficiency anemia.
Kapelushnik, J; Levy, J; Moser, A; Pinsk, V; Yerushalmi, B, 2008
)
0.35
"These preliminary data suggest that administration of intravenous iron in pediatric patients is well tolerated and has a good clinical result, with minimal adverse reactions."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose therapy in a group of children with iron deficiency anemia.
Kapelushnik, J; Levy, J; Moser, A; Pinsk, V; Yerushalmi, B, 2008
)
0.35
"45% per patient) and a total of 56 adverse events (1."( The comparative safety of various intravenous iron preparations in chronic kidney disease patients.
Anirban, G; Gupta, KL; Jha, V; Kohli, HS; Sakhuja, V, 2008
)
0.35
" There were tolerable adverse events in both groups."( Safety and usefulness of intravenous iron sucrose in the management of preoperative anemia in patients with menorrhagia: a phase IV, open-label, prospective, randomized study.
Chung, HH; Kang, SB; Kim, SC; Kim, YH; Kim, YT, 2009
)
0.35
"Preoperative intravenous iron sucrose administration is more effective than oral iron and is as safe as oral iron therapy in the correction of preoperative anemia due to menorrhagia."( Safety and usefulness of intravenous iron sucrose in the management of preoperative anemia in patients with menorrhagia: a phase IV, open-label, prospective, randomized study.
Chung, HH; Kang, SB; Kim, SC; Kim, YH; Kim, YT, 2009
)
0.35
"Iron sucrose and low-molecular-weight iron dextran (LMW-ID), two commonly used iron solutions, have been compared in terms of allergic adverse event profiles to date."( Safety profiles of total dose infusion of low-molecular-weight iron dextran and high-dose iron sucrose in renal patients.
Acar, K; Atalay, H; Govec, N; Solak, Y; Turk, S, 2011
)
0.37
"Spontaneously-reported rates of adverse events (AEs) of intravenous (i."( Differences in spontaneously reported hypersensitivity and serious adverse events for intravenous iron preparations: comparison of Europe and North America.
Bailie, GR; Hörl, WH; Verhoef, JJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Safety and tolerability of both groups were compared on the basis of reported systemic and local adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous iron carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose for treatment of postpartum anemia.
Christoph, P; Pfenniger, A; Schuller, C; Surbek, D, 2012
)
0.38
"Rapid administration of high ICM doses was as well tolerated as IS with overall adverse events of 5% (ICM) vs."( Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous iron carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose for treatment of postpartum anemia.
Christoph, P; Pfenniger, A; Schuller, C; Surbek, D, 2012
)
0.38
"IV ICM is as safe as IS in the management of postpartum (IDA) iron deficiency anemia despite five times of higher dosage."( Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous iron carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose for treatment of postpartum anemia.
Christoph, P; Pfenniger, A; Schuller, C; Surbek, D, 2012
)
0.38
" Among 619 unique patients who received IV iron over a 2-year period, we found 32 adverse events (AEs), ranging from urticaria to chest pain."( Comparative rates of adverse events with different formulations of intravenous iron.
Abel, GA; Hevelone, N; Mandell, E; Okam, MM; Ross, A; Wentz, R, 2012
)
0.38
"We assessed adverse event rates between dosing groups."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of 3 iron sucrose iron maintenance regimens in children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD: a randomized controlled trial.
Goldstein, SL; Morris, D; Warady, BA, 2013
)
0.39
" No differences were noted between regimens in reported adverse effects, which were all minor."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of 3 iron sucrose iron maintenance regimens in children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD: a randomized controlled trial.
Goldstein, SL; Morris, D; Warady, BA, 2013
)
0.39
" Post several months of use we observed increased rates of adverse events from patients and hence performed this analysis to confirm these findings."( Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients.
Choi, GY; Kim, JS; Lee, ES; Lee, IS; Lee, JJ; Park, BR, 2013
)
0.39
"Data on adverse events was retrospectively collected from 658 patients treated between September 2004 and December 2011."( Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients.
Choi, GY; Kim, JS; Lee, ES; Lee, IS; Lee, JJ; Park, BR, 2013
)
0.39
" Adverse drug reactions were more frequent in the ISS(FRX) groups vs."( Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients.
Choi, GY; Kim, JS; Lee, ES; Lee, IS; Lee, JJ; Park, BR, 2013
)
0.39
"This is the first large analysis suggesting increased adverse events due to an ISS."( Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients.
Choi, GY; Kim, JS; Lee, ES; Lee, IS; Lee, JJ; Park, BR, 2013
)
0.39
" However, parenteral iron supplementation is usually safe and without major side effects."( [Safety aspects of parenteral iron supplementation therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease].
Münch, HG; Potthoff, SA, 2013
)
0.39
" Adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated."( Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide compared with sevelamer hydrochloride in Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia: A randomized, open-label, multicentre, 12-week phase III study.
Akizawa, T; Fukagawa, M; Koiwa, F; Terao, A; Yokoyama, K, 2017
)
0.46
" The proportion of patients reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was 86."( One-year efficacy and safety of the iron-based phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide in patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Covic, AC; Floege, J; Ketteler, M; Lisk, LJ; Mann, J; Rakov, V; Rastogi, A; Spinowitz, B; Sprague, SM, 2017
)
0.46
"Safety was evaluated based on the development of adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs)."( Long-Term Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of PA21 (Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide) in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients With Hyperphosphatemia: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Study.
Akizawa, T; Fukagawa, M; Koiwa, F; Yokoyama, K, 2017
)
0.46
" The median prevalence of adverse drug reactions for IPM (2."( Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron polymaltose, iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose in pregnancy: A systematic review.
Grivell, RM; Grzeskowiak, LE; Mol, BW; Qassim, A, 2018
)
0.48
" Intravenous iron compounds were in the past associated with serious adverse reactions and historically were considered a last resort in children."( Safety and efficacy of parenteral iron in children with inflammatory bowel disease.
Epstein, J; Fell, JME; Goto, E; Korologou-Linden, R; Papadopoulos, M; Patel, D; Soondrum, K, 2018
)
0.48
" Safety, tolerability and adverse events were established by case note review."( Safety and efficacy of parenteral iron in children with inflammatory bowel disease.
Epstein, J; Fell, JME; Goto, E; Korologou-Linden, R; Papadopoulos, M; Patel, D; Soondrum, K, 2018
)
0.48
" No serious adverse effects were reported."( Effectiveness and safety of ferric carboxymaltose compared to iron sucrose in women with iron deficiency anemia: phase IV clinical trials.
Ara, R; Bader, GN; Naqash, A, 2018
)
0.48
"Parenteral therapy is effective in IDA, but FCM elevates hemoglobin level and restored iron stores faster than IS with minimum adverse drug reactions."( Effectiveness and safety of ferric carboxymaltose compared to iron sucrose in women with iron deficiency anemia: phase IV clinical trials.
Ara, R; Bader, GN; Naqash, A, 2018
)
0.48
" The proportion of patients reporting serious adverse events (AEs) was 27."( Long-term efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in African American dialysis patients.
Covic, AC; Floege, J; Ketteler, M; Rakov, V; Rastogi, A; Sprague, SM; Walpen, S, 2018
)
0.48
" Incidence of adverse events was < 60% in both groups, and no significant difference was observed between the treatment groups."( Comparison of efficacy and safety between intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and saccharated ferric oxide in Japanese patients with iron-deficiency anemia due to hypermenorrhea: a multi-center, randomized, open-label noninferiority study.
Hanashi, H; Hirai, K; Ikuta, K; Matsuyama, Y; Momoeda, M; Ota, Y; Shimura, A; Terauchi, M, 2019
)
0.51
" We reviewed the medical record for adverse reactions to any TDI of iron sucrose as well as pre-TDI and post-TDI hemoglobin (Hgb) levels to assess efficacy."( Retrospective Safety Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Assisted Total Dose Iron Sucrose Protocol in Hospital Inpatients With Iron Deficiency Anemia.
Adams, K; Gasperi, L; Lukenbill, JC; Schneider, R; Sharma, V; Taylor, MJ; Wall, G, 2021
)
0.62
" 16 (2%) of 958 women in the intravenous iron sucrose group and 13 (1%) of 976 women in the standard therapy group had serious maternal adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of intravenous iron sucrose versus standard oral iron therapy in pregnant women with moderate-to-severe anaemia in India: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.
Agarwal, S; Baswal, D; Batra, A; Bhaskaran, S; Bhushan, H; Chauhan, MB; Devasenapathy, N; Divakar, H; Dongre, H; Francis, P; Gupta, A; Kotru, M; Malhotra, V; Malik, S; Mittal, P; Mwinga, K; Nanda, S; Neogi, SB; Radhika, AG; Saluja, S; Sangwan, R; Shah, D; Sikka, M; Singh, A; Singh, R; Yadav, S; Zodpey, S, 2019
)
0.51
"A monthly maintenance intravenous dose of 100 mg iron sucrose may be a practical, effective, and safe in the short term, treatment of anemia in PD patients resulting in improved hemoglobin levels, iron indices, and erythropoietin response."( Efficacy and safety of a low monthly dose of intravenous iron sucrose in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Anagnostou, N; Intzevidou, E; Katsaounou, C; Kougioumtzidou, O; Lamprou, V; Lemonidis, N; Lysitska, A; Minasidis, I; Mitsopoulos, E; Papadopoulou, D; Pateinakis, P, 2020
)
0.56
"The optimal intravenous (IV) iron would allow safe correction of iron deficiency at a single infusion over a short time."( Safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside 1000/ferric derisomaltose versus iron sucrose in patients with chronic kidney disease: the FERWON-NEPHRO randomized, open-label, comparative trial.
Belo, D; Berkowitz, M; Bhandari, S; Kalra, PA; Thomsen, LL; Wolf, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Secondary endpoints included incidence of composite cardiovascular adverse events (AEs)."( Safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside 1000/ferric derisomaltose versus iron sucrose in patients with chronic kidney disease: the FERWON-NEPHRO randomized, open-label, comparative trial.
Belo, D; Berkowitz, M; Bhandari, S; Kalra, PA; Thomsen, LL; Wolf, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Safety and efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease.
Abitbol, CL; Ahn, SY; Balgradean, M; Enoiu, M; Fathallah-Shaykh, S; Fila, M; Greenbaum, LA; Jankauskiene, A; Jeck, N; Klaus, G; Nelson, R; Paredes, A; Perrin, A; Stoica, C; Swinford, RD; Wickman, L, 2021
)
0.62
" The objective of this comparative study was to assess adverse events associated with four intravenous iron preparations and estimated medical costs, in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database."( Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Goodnough, LT; Kaluza, K; Numan, S; Trumbo, H, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse event-associated medical costs were estimated using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2016 data."( Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Goodnough, LT; Kaluza, K; Numan, S; Trumbo, H, 2021
)
0.62
" Downstream medical costs per adverse event were highest with iron dextran (US$8615) and ferumoxytol (US$8164), followed by iron sucrose (US$4212), and ferric carboxymaltose (US$1832)."( Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Goodnough, LT; Kaluza, K; Numan, S; Trumbo, H, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse event-related medical costs were highest for iron dextran and ferumoxytol, and lowest for ferric carboxymaltose."( Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Goodnough, LT; Kaluza, K; Numan, S; Trumbo, H, 2021
)
0.62
" The secondary outcome was to compare the safety of FCM and IS, assessed by the incidence of adverse events during iron replacement."( Comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose for iron deficiency anemia in obstetric and gynecologic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Choi, YJ; Go, DY; Jang, YK; Ko, EJ; Lee, SW; Shin, HW; You, HS, 2021
)
0.62
"FCM group showed better efficacy in increasing Hb and ferritin levels and a favorable safety profile with fewer adverse events compared with IS group for IDA treatment among obstetric and gynecologic patients."( Comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose for iron deficiency anemia in obstetric and gynecologic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Choi, YJ; Go, DY; Jang, YK; Ko, EJ; Lee, SW; Shin, HW; You, HS, 2021
)
0.62
" No severe adverse drug reactions were observed in either the patients receiving FCH or SFOH."( Long-term efficacy and safety of iron-based phosphate binders, ferric citrate hydrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in hemodialysis patients.
Fujino, T; Kaburagi, N; Morimoto, K; Oya, M; Takemitsu, TY; Yamashita, N; Yoshida, T, 2022
)
0.72
"The results of the present study suggest that the iron-based phosphate binders, FCH and SFOH, decrease serum phosphate concentrations consistently and are safe to use over the long-term in maintenance hemodialysis patients."( Long-term efficacy and safety of iron-based phosphate binders, ferric citrate hydrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in hemodialysis patients.
Fujino, T; Kaburagi, N; Morimoto, K; Oya, M; Takemitsu, TY; Yamashita, N; Yoshida, T, 2022
)
0.72
" Efficacy outcomes included changes in hemoglobin (Hb) and iron parameters; safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), and hypophosphatemia."( Efficacy and safety of ferric derisomaltose (FDI) compared with iron sucrose (IS) in patients with iron deficiency anemia after bariatric surgery.
Achebe, MM; Auerbach, M; Derman, RJ; Thomsen, LL, 2022
)
0.72
"PN with iron sucrose for prevention of anemia in preterm infants is safe and efficacious to some extent."( Efficacy and safety of parenteral nutrition with iron sucrose for anemia prevention in preterm infants: A randomized, double-blind controlled study.
Lu, L; Tang, Q; Tao, Y; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, Q; Yan, W; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" This systematic review investigated the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) during or after treatment with iron and/or ESAs."( Adverse events of iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in preoperatively anemic elective surgery patients: a systematic review.
Avau, B; Bekkering, G; Compernolle, V; De Buck, E; Georgsen, J; Laermans, J; Manzini, PM; Meybohm, P; Ozier, Y; Van Remoortel, H; Vandekerckhove, P, 2022
)
0.72
" Her serum iron concentration decreased below the toxic range over the next 14 h, and she was discharged home the next day."( Decreased Clinical Toxicity and Two-Phase Elimination Kinetics Observed After Intravenous Iron Sucrose Overdose.
Brent, J; Furmaga, J; Meadows, J; Weiss, ST, 2022
)
0.72
" The infusions were well tolerated, and no short-term adverse reactions or laboratory abnormalities were observed."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose in children younger than 2 years with intestinal failure.
Lepus, CA; Mokha, JS; Samela, K, 2023
)
0.91
" Primary safety variables were the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), medical events of special interest (MESIs), and variations in iron-related parameters."( Safety and effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in Spanish patients on dialysis: sub-analysis of the VERIFIE study.
Arenas, MD; Bajo, MA; Cannata-Andia, J; Delgado, M; Devesa-Such, RJ; García-Fernández, N; Martín-De Francisco, ÁL; Martin-Malo, A; Molina, P; Molina-Higueras, MJ; Peiró-Jordán, R; Ríos-Moreno, F,
)
0.13
"SFOH showed a favorable effectiveness profile, a similar safety profile to that observed in the international study with most adverse events of mild/moderate severity, and a low daily pill burden in Spanish patients in dialysis."( Safety and effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in Spanish patients on dialysis: sub-analysis of the VERIFIE study.
Arenas, MD; Bajo, MA; Cannata-Andia, J; Delgado, M; Devesa-Such, RJ; García-Fernández, N; Martín-De Francisco, ÁL; Martin-Malo, A; Molina, P; Molina-Higueras, MJ; Peiró-Jordán, R; Ríos-Moreno, F,
)
0.13

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Development of these pharmaceutical agents requires pharmacokinetic studies monitoring levels of both the administered agent and transferrin-bound iron (TBI)."( Analysis of total and transferrin-bound iron in human serum for pharmacokinetic studies of iron-sucrose formulations.
Burrows, DM; Corcoran, HF; Dotzauer, H; Goggin, MM; Gozum, SD; Janis, GC; Lundberg, RA; Nguyen, A; Tann, CM, 2011
)
0.37
" This post hoc analysis of a Phase 3 study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of the iron-based phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) and sevelamer (SEV) carbonate on VDRA activity in dialysis patients."( Pharmacodynamic Effects of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide and Sevelamer Carbonate on Vitamin D Receptor Agonist Bioactivity in Dialysis Patients.
Botha, J; Chong, EM; Covic, AC; Floege, J; Ketteler, M; Rastogi, A; Sprague, SM, 2016
)
0.43
" Potential interactions of SFOH and SEV with VDRAs were assessed using serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) concentrations as a pharmacodynamic biomarker."( Pharmacodynamic Effects of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide and Sevelamer Carbonate on Vitamin D Receptor Agonist Bioactivity in Dialysis Patients.
Botha, J; Chong, EM; Covic, AC; Floege, J; Ketteler, M; Rastogi, A; Sprague, SM, 2016
)
0.43

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
") once per week for 5 doses in combination with 2,000 international units (IU) EPO (Eprex, Cilag-Janssen), subcutaneously given simultaneously also for 5 doses."( The effect of i.v. iron alone or in combination with low-dose erythropoietin in the rapid correction of anemia of chronic renal failure in the predialysis period.
Agbaria, Z; Baruch, R; Blum, M; Deutsch, V; Iaina, A; Irony, M; Schwartz, D; Silverberg, DS; Steinbruch, S; Yachnin, T, 2001
)
0.31
"In IBD patients with refractory anaemia the administration of darbepoetin in combination with intravenous iron sucrose can raise haemoglobin levels."( Effectiveness of darbepoetin-alfa in combination with intravenous iron sucrose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and refractory anaemia: a pilot study.
Karmiris, K; Kouroumalis, EA; Koutroubakis, IE; Makreas, S; Niniraki, M; Xidakis, C, 2006
)
0.33
" Therefore, the potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and selected drugs commonly taken by dialysis patients were investigated."( Drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, omeprazole, digoxin and warfarin in healthy subjects.
Chong, E; Kalia, V; Willsie, S; Winkle, P, 2014
)
0.4
"Systemic exposure based on AUC0-∞ for all drugs, and AUC0-24 for all drugs except omeprazole (for which AUC 0-8 h was measured), was unaffected to a clinically significant extent by the presence of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, irrespective of whether sucroferric oxyhydroxide was administered with the drug or 2 h earlier."( Drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, omeprazole, digoxin and warfarin in healthy subjects.
Chong, E; Kalia, V; Willsie, S; Winkle, P, 2014
)
0.4
"There is a low risk of drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, digoxin and warfarin."( Drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, omeprazole, digoxin and warfarin in healthy subjects.
Chong, E; Kalia, V; Willsie, S; Winkle, P, 2014
)
0.4
"To explore the clinical efficacy of iron sucrose combined with recombinant human erythropoietin(EPO) for the treatment of anemia in elderly patients with hip fracture."( [Clinical observation of iron sucrose combined with recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of anemia of hip fracture in elderly patients].
Dai, ZH; Huang, H; Xu, HY, 2019
)
0.51
" Among them, 32 cases in group A were treated with iron sucrose alone, 32 cases in group B were treated with recombinant human erythropoietin alone, and 32 cases in group C were treated with iron sucrose combined with recombinant human erythropoietin."( [Clinical observation of iron sucrose combined with recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of anemia of hip fracture in elderly patients].
Dai, ZH; Huang, H; Xu, HY, 2019
)
0.51

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Oral iron administration with appraisable bioavailability was able to compensate blood losses up to 151 and with increasing doses up to 361 per year with maintenance of normal or borderline haemoglobin values."( [Chronic hemorrhagic iron deficiency. Sources of hemorrhage, blood loss and systematic iron substitution].
Balling, A; Hausmann, K; Kuse, R, 1987
)
0.27
" Oral iron is a low cost treatment however its effectiveness is limited by low bioavailability and poor tolerability."( State of the iron: how to diagnose and efficiently treat iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease.
Bhandari, S; Muñoz, M; Reinisch, W; Staun, M, 2013
)
0.39
"Currently, most countries apply the standard generic approach for the approval of intended copies of originator nanoparticle iron medicinal products, requiring only demonstration of bioequivalence to a reference medicinal product by bioavailability studies."( Nanoparticle iron medicinal products - Requirements for approval of intended copies of non-biological complex drugs (NBCD) and the importance of clinical comparative studies.
Borchard, G; Flühmann, B; Mühlebach, S, 2012
)
0.38
"The bioavailability of Venofer® and ISA was investigated in both cell types by a ferrozin-based assay."( Bioavailability and stability of intravenous iron sucrose originator versus generic iron sucrose AZAD.
Cornelius, C; Goldenberg, H; Praschberger, M; Scheiber-Mojdehkar, B; Schitegg, M; Sturm, B, 2015
)
0.42
"ISA shows identical physico-chemical features and identical bioavailability in vitro."( Bioavailability and stability of intravenous iron sucrose originator versus generic iron sucrose AZAD.
Cornelius, C; Goldenberg, H; Praschberger, M; Scheiber-Mojdehkar, B; Schitegg, M; Sturm, B, 2015
)
0.42
" In conclusion, FCM has low bioavailability for liver parenchyma cells, therefore liver iron deposition is unlikely."( Iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose: no correlation between physicochemical stability and biological activity.
Cornelius, C; Goldenberg, H; Haider, K; Praschberger, M; Scheiber-Mojdehkar, B; Schitegg, M; Sturm, B, 2015
)
0.42
" In vitro studies with Caco-2 cells suggested that newly synthesized microemulsions had better iron bioavailability as compared to commercially available iron dextran formulations."( Potential of Alginate Encapsulated Ferric Saccharate Microemulsions to Ameliorate Iron Deficiency in Mice.
Angmo, S; Mukhija, K; Sandhir, R; Singhal, K; Singhal, NK; Yadav, H; Yadav, K, 2016
)
0.43
" Oral iron is simple and cheap to administer and does not require hospital visits, but is poorly absorbed in advanced CKD and is associated with unpleasant gastrointestinal side effects."( Iron Treatment Strategies in Nondialysis CKD.
Macdougall, IC, 2016
)
0.43
" Our data show that the application of (phospho-)proteomics can lead to a better understanding of metabolic processes, including the uptake, biodegradation and bioavailability of nanomedicines."( Uncovering the dynamics of cellular responses induced by iron-carbohydrate complexes in human macrophages using quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics.
Ayala-Nunez, V; Barton Alston, AE; Bossart, J; Buljan, M; Digigow, R; Flühmann, B; Rippl, A; Wick, P, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
") treatment with epoetin alfa 300 IU/kg twice weekly for 3 weeks was the optimum dosage for facilitation of AB donation and minimization of the decrease in Hct prior to elective orthopedic surgery."( Epoetin alfa for autologous blood donation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant anemia.
Mercuriali, F, 1996
)
0.29
" Adequate intravenous iron supplementation allows reduction of epoetin dosage by approximately 40%."( Safety aspects of parenteral iron in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Hörl, WH; Sunder-Plassmann, G, 1997
)
0.3
" The dosage of iron was individually adapted according to a target hemoglobin level of 13 g/100 ml and to the actual lowest hemoglobin level measured."( [Intravenous iron in the treatment of postoperative anemia in surgery of the spine in infants and adolescents].
Bernière, J; Dehullu, JP; Gall, O; Murat, I, 1998
)
0.3
"Iron balance is critical for adequate erythropoiesis and there remains much debate concerning the optimal timing and dosage of iron therapy for haemodialysis patients receiving recombinant human erythropoietin therapy."( Enhanced oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron therapy.
Kho, B; Lim, PS; Wei, YH; Yu, YL, 1999
)
0.3
"To determine the effect of different dosing schedules of intravenous iron therapy on the hematocrit level, we randomly assigned 18 patients to 3 groups."( Clinical characteristic of parenteral iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients receiving erythropoietin therapy.
Chang, HY; Chen, KS; Kao, HH; Lee, CC; Tsai, CJ, 2000
)
0.31
" To save manpower and costs, we recommend the large single dosing schedule."( Clinical characteristic of parenteral iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients receiving erythropoietin therapy.
Chang, HY; Chen, KS; Kao, HH; Lee, CC; Tsai, CJ, 2000
)
0.31
" iron preparations with respect to haemoglobin levels, iron status and recombinant human erythropoetin (rHuEpo) dosage requirements in stable, rHuEpo-treated haemodialysis patients (maintenance phase of iron treatment) over 6 months."( A randomized, controlled parallel-group trial on efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (Venofer) vs iron gluconate (Ferrlecit) in haemodialysis patients treated with rHuEpo.
Bahner, U; Bettger, H; Kosch, M; Matzkies, F; Schaefer, RM; Teschner, M, 2001
)
0.31
"5 ng/ml with iron gluconate), while rHuEpo dosage did not change significantly throughout the study."( A randomized, controlled parallel-group trial on efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (Venofer) vs iron gluconate (Ferrlecit) in haemodialysis patients treated with rHuEpo.
Bahner, U; Bettger, H; Kosch, M; Matzkies, F; Schaefer, RM; Teschner, M, 2001
)
0.31
" Of the IV iron preparations available, iron sucrose has proved its efficacy and safety; however, there are no guidelines or systematic studies examining the optimum safe dosage regimen for this compound."( Intravenous iron sucrose: establishing a safe dose.
Chandler, G; Harchowal, J; Macdougall, IC, 2001
)
0.31
" Three patients had nonserious events that did not preclude further dosing of SFGC."( Chronic use of sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: safety of higher-dose (> or =250 mg) administration.
Agarwal, R; Coyne, DW; Dahl, N; Folkert, VW; Michael, B; Myirski, P; Warnock, DG, 2003
)
0.32
" We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each product, including risk of anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, dosage regimens, and costs."( Parenteral iron therapy options.
Rodgers, GM; Silverstein, SB, 2004
)
0.32
"Isolated mouse proximal tubule segments (PTS) or cultured proximal tubular [human kidney (HK-2)] cells were exposed to four representative iron preparations [iron sucrose (FeS), iron dextran (FeD), iron gluconate (FeG), or iron oligosaccharide (FeOS)] over a broad dosage range (0, 30 to 1000 microg iron/mL)."( Parenteral iron nephrotoxicity: potential mechanisms and consequences.
Hanson, SY; Johnson, AC; Zager, RA, 2004
)
0.32
"In this safety study, iron sucrose was given in two dosing regimens."( Iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: safety of replacement and maintenance regimens.
Aronoff, GR; Bennett, WM; Blumenthal, S; Charytan, C; Pennell, JP; Reed, J; Rothstein, M; Strom, J; Van Wyck, D; Wolfe, A; Yee, J, 2004
)
0.32
" Although peak serum concentrations of all compounds were inversely proportional to body weight, the percentage of change during dialysis was not related to dosage or body weight."( Effects of different dialysis membranes on serum concentrations of epoetin alfa, darbepoetin alfa, enoxaparin, and iron sucrose during dialysis.
Chester, K; McMahon, LP; Walker, RG, 2004
)
0.32
" The iron gluconate was given in a dosage of 62."( Intravenous iron in a primary-care clinic.
Maslovsky, I, 2005
)
0.33
"Administration of 200 mg of iron sucrose as an intravenous bolus injection over 2 minutes is a practical dosing regimen in patients with chronic kidney disease, resulting in considerable savings in time and cost."( Administration of intravenous iron sucrose as a 2-minute push to CKD patients: a prospective evaluation of 2,297 injections.
Macdougall, IC; Roche, A, 2005
)
0.33
"We performed a prospective multicentre clinical trial in iron-replete haemodialysis patients to evaluate the efficacy of weekly low-dose (50 mg) intravenous iron sucrose administration for 6 months to maintain the iron status, and to examine the effect on epoetin dosage needed to maintain stable haemoglobin values in these patients."( Weekly low-dose treatment with intravenous iron sucrose maintains iron status and decreases epoetin requirement in iron-replete haemodialysis patients.
Ambühl, PM; Binet, I; Dickenmann, M; Keusch, G; Lüthi, L; Schiesser, D; Schmidli, M; Tsinalis, D; Wüthrich, RP, 2006
)
0.33
"A regular 50 mg weekly dosing schedule of iron sucrose maintains stable iron stores and haemoglobin levels in haemodialysed patients and allows considerable dose reductions for epoetins."( Weekly low-dose treatment with intravenous iron sucrose maintains iron status and decreases epoetin requirement in iron-replete haemodialysis patients.
Ambühl, PM; Binet, I; Dickenmann, M; Keusch, G; Lüthi, L; Schiesser, D; Schmidli, M; Tsinalis, D; Wüthrich, RP, 2006
)
0.33
" Patients received IV iron sucrose therapy in treatment and maintenance dosing cycles over 10-week periods."( The safety of intravenous iron sucrose use in the elderly patient.
Charytan, C; Reed, J; Yee, J, 2007
)
0.34
" Iron needs and erythropoietin dosing were similar in both the elder and younger adult patients."( The safety of intravenous iron sucrose use in the elderly patient.
Charytan, C; Reed, J; Yee, J, 2007
)
0.34
" groups in terms of sex, age, duration of hemodialysis, dialysis frequency per week, EPO dosage per week, the level of intact parathyroid hormone, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or hematological parameters at baseline."( Intravenous iron sucrose in Chinese hemodialysis patients with renal anemia.
Li, H; Wang, SX, 2008
)
0.35
" Differences in iron formulation, dosing regiment, and peripheral iron status may explain some of the discrepancies between this and previous IV iron treatment studies."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous iron sucrose in restless legs syndrome.
Allen, RP; Barker, PB; Beard, JL; Earley, CJ; Horská, A; Mohamed, MA, 2009
)
0.35
"There were no differences between the IV and oral groups in terms of sex, age, duration of PD, mean dialysate dosage per day, erythropoietin dosage per week, or hematological parameters at baseline."( Intravenous iron sucrose in peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia.
Li, H; Wang, SX,
)
0.13
" Further studies on target patient groups, dosing and dosing intervals are warranted before iron sucrose could be considered for treatment of iron deficient patients with RLS."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-center study of intravenous iron sucrose and placebo in the treatment of restless legs syndrome.
Grote, L; Hedner, J; Leissner, L; Ulfberg, J, 2009
)
0.35
" ESA dosage used in the iron sucrose group at week 8 was significantly lower than in the Fe chloride group (244."( Comparison of parenteral iron sucrose and ferric chloride during erythropoietin therapy of haemodialysis patients.
Chen, HH; Chen, YC; Chuang, CK; Lee, KF; Lin, HC; Wu, CJ, 2010
)
0.36
"Although the differences in ESA dosage, ferritin and iron dosage between two groups were found during the study period while similar results were shown at the end of 24 week study."( Comparison of parenteral iron sucrose and ferric chloride during erythropoietin therapy of haemodialysis patients.
Chen, HH; Chen, YC; Chuang, CK; Lee, KF; Lin, HC; Wu, CJ, 2010
)
0.36
" However, there are no guidelines about safety limits in dosage amounts or intervals."( Postoperative high-dose intravenous iron sucrose with low dose erythropoietin therapy after total hip replacement.
Kim, S; Lee, SC; Lim, H; Yoon, J, 2010
)
0.36
" The outcomes of administering this dosage regimen are reported as observational retrospective analysis using patient record data in 2009."( Total dose infusion of intravenous iron in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving haemodialysis.
Fenwick, S; Peebles, G, 2011
)
0.37
" We aimed to compare adverse-effect profiles of LMW-ID and iron sucrose with varying dosing schedules in PD patients with a hope to foster use of parenteral iron solutions in PD patients."( Comparison of adverse-event profiles of intravenous low-molecular-weight iron dextran and iron sucrose in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Atalay, H; Guney, I; Kaya, E; Solak, Y; Turk, S; Turkmen, K, 2011
)
0.37
"The simpler FCM-based dosing regimen showed better efficacy and compliance, as well as a good safety profile, compared with the Ganzoni-calculated IS dose regimen."( FERGIcor, a randomized controlled trial on ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease.
Bokemeyer, B; Chopey, IV; Evstatiev, R; Gasche, C; Gutzwiller, FS; Iqbal, T; Khalif, IL; Marteau, P; Riopel, L; Stein, J, 2011
)
0.37
" Ferric carboxymaltose has a comparable safety profile to iron sucrose but offers the advantage of a much higher iron dosage at a time reducing the need for repeated applications and increasing patients' comfort."( Intravenous iron treatment in pregnancy: comparison of high-dose ferric carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose.
Christoph, P; De Tejada, BM; Irion, O; Schuller, C; Studer, H; Surbek, D, 2012
)
0.38
"We assessed adverse event rates between dosing groups."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of 3 iron sucrose iron maintenance regimens in children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD: a randomized controlled trial.
Goldstein, SL; Morris, D; Warady, BA, 2013
)
0.39
" Costs per 200/500/1,000 mg total dosage treatment cycle were CHF 101/210/420 for ferric carboxymaltose and CHF 144/375/721 for iron sucrose."( Budget impact of parenteral iron treatment of iron deficiency: methodological issues raised by using real-life data.
Braunhofer, P; Brock, E; Schneider, H; Troxler, J, 2014
)
0.4
" Therefore, sucroferric oxyhydroxide may be administered concomitantly without the need to adjust the dosage regimens of these drugs."( Drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, omeprazole, digoxin and warfarin in healthy subjects.
Chong, E; Kalia, V; Willsie, S; Winkle, P, 2014
)
0.4
" Additionally, sucroferric oxyhydroxide at maintenance dosages was significantly more effective than low dosage sucroferric oxyhydroxide (250 mg/day) with regard to maintaining controlled serum phosphorus levels during weeks 24-27 of treatment."( Sucroferric oxyhydroxide: a review in hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis.
Greig, SL; Plosker, GL, 2015
)
0.42
" Bolus dosing was associated with an increase in infection-related events among both ferric gluconate and iron sucrose users."( Comparative Short-term Safety of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Versus Iron Sucrose in Hemodialysis Patients.
Brookhart, MA; Ellis, AR; Freburger, JK; Kshirsagar, AV; Wang, L; Winkelmayer, WC, 2016
)
0.43
" Maintaining hemodialysis patients within narrow hemoglobin targets, preventing cycling outside target, and reducing ESA dosing to prevent adverse outcomes requires considerable attention from caregivers."( Performance of a Predictive Model for Long-Term Hemoglobin Response to Darbepoetin and Iron Administration in a Large Cohort of Hemodialysis Patients.
Amato, C; Barbieri, C; Bellocchio, F; Bolzoni, E; Canaud, B; Cattinelli, I; Gatti, E; Macdougall, IC; Mari, F; Martin, JD; Stopper, A; Stuard, S, 2016
)
0.43
" IV iron can be given as large intermittent doses (loading therapy) or in smaller doses at frequent intervals (maintenance dosing regimen)."( Iron Treatment Strategies in Dialysis-Dependent CKD.
Coyne, DW; Daloul, R; Pandey, R, 2016
)
0.43
" Furthermore, iron isomaltoside has an advantage over iron sucrose in allowing higher cumulative dosing in fewer administrations."( A randomized trial of iron isomaltoside versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia.
Achebe, MM; Auerbach, M; Derman, R; Modiano, MR; Roman, E; Thomsen, LL, 2017
)
0.46
" Iron deficiency was modeled using dosing tables and retreatments were modeled based on a pooled retrospective analysis."( Intravenous iron treatments for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: a budget impact analysis of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer) in the UK.
Muduma, G; Pollock, RF, 2017
)
0.46
" These patients tended to have increased levels of serum calcium, hematocrit, and serum ferritin; a decreased number of phosphate binder tablets (from 21 tablets/d to 8 tablets/d); and a decreased dosage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents."( [Low Continuity Rate of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide among Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with High Phosphate Binder Pill Burden].
Mitsuboshi, S; Nagai, K; Okajima, H; Yamada, H, 2018
)
0.48
"Intravenous (IV) iron supplementation is a standard maintenance treatment for hemodialysis (HD) patients, but the optimum dosing regimen is unknown."( Randomized Trial Comparing Proactive, High-Dose versus Reactive, Low-Dose Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Hemodialysis (PIVOTAL): Study Design and Baseline Data.
Anker, SD; Bhandari, S; Farrington, K; Ford, I; Kalra, PA; Macdougall, IC; McMurray, JJV; Murray, H; Steenkamp, R; Tomson, CRV; Wheeler, DC; White, C; Winearls, CG, 2018
)
0.48
"PIVOTAL will provide important information about the optimum dosing of IV iron in HD patients representative of usual clinical practice."( Randomized Trial Comparing Proactive, High-Dose versus Reactive, Low-Dose Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Hemodialysis (PIVOTAL): Study Design and Baseline Data.
Anker, SD; Bhandari, S; Farrington, K; Ford, I; Kalra, PA; Macdougall, IC; McMurray, JJV; Murray, H; Steenkamp, R; Tomson, CRV; Wheeler, DC; White, C; Winearls, CG, 2018
)
0.48
" The convenient dosing with lesser number of total doses to complete the treatment will lead to better compliance in community setting."( Comparison of ferric Carboxymaltose and iron sucrose complex for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy- randomised controlled trial.
Bhatla, N; Jose, A; Kalaivani, M; Kriplani, A; Mahey, R; Saxena, R; Sharma, JB, 2019
)
0.51
" PB treatment, number of pills, serum phosphorus levels, and intravenous iron medication and dosage were collected monthly during the six months of treatment with either PB or SO."( Effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in patients on on-line hemodiafiltration in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective study.
Aniceto, J; Ferreira, A; Navarro, D; Neves, PL; Pinto, B; Ponce, P,
)
0.13
"This study demonstrates the comparative safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside versus iron sucrose, with similar dosing schedules in dialysis patients."( Conversion of haemodialysis patients from iron sucrose to iron isomaltoside: a real-world experience.
Bhandari, S; Burton, JO; Dhada, S; Jesus-Silva, JA; Lamplugh, A, 2020
)
0.56
" The goal of this study was to investigate if a pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for darbepoetin alfa (DA) and iron sucrose improves the attainment of target hemoglobin levels."( A pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for darbepoetin alfa and iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, controlled trial.
Birnie, E; Heetman-Meijer, CFM; Schrama, YC; Swart, EL; van den Oever, FJ; Vasbinder, EC, 2020
)
0.56
" Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dosing did not differ between groups."( Comparison of Iron Dosing Strategies in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bielesz, B; Gabriel, M; Gleiss, A; Hörl, WH; Lorenz, M; Monteforte, R; Prikoszovich, T; Sunder-Plassmann, G; Wolzt, M, 2021
)
0.62
"Intravenous iron sucrose is becoming a prevailing treatment for individuals undergoing maintenance haemodialysis, but comparisons of dosing regimens are lacking."( High-dose versus low-dose iron sucrose in individuals undergoing maintenance haemodialysis: a retrospective study.
Cheng, H; Liu, L; Liu, Q; Lv, Y; Wu, Y; Xu, B; Yu, W, 2021
)
0.62
"Data from 26 RCTs and 16 cohort studies involving a total of 6062 patients were extracted, on 6 treatment comparisons: (1) intravenous (IV) versus oral iron, (2) IV iron versus usual care/no iron, (3) IV ferric carboxymaltose versus IV iron sucrose, (4) ESA+iron versus control (placebo and/or iron, no treatment), (5) ESA+IV iron versus ESA+oral iron, and (6) ESA+IV iron versus ESA+IV iron (different ESA dosing regimens)."( Adverse events of iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in preoperatively anemic elective surgery patients: a systematic review.
Avau, B; Bekkering, G; Compernolle, V; De Buck, E; Georgsen, J; Laermans, J; Manzini, PM; Meybohm, P; Ozier, Y; Van Remoortel, H; Vandekerckhove, P, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (650)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199054 (8.31)18.7374
1990's38 (5.85)18.2507
2000's193 (29.69)29.6817
2010's274 (42.15)24.3611
2020's91 (14.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials193 (27.97%)5.53%
Reviews69 (10.00%)6.00%
Case Studies47 (6.81%)4.05%
Observational13 (1.88%)0.25%
Other368 (53.33%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (97)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Effects of Intravenous Iron Supplementation on Exercise Capacity During Sustained Alveolar Hypoxia in Healthy Humans. [NCT01265108]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-label, Comparative Safety and Efficacy Trial of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) and Iron Sucrose in Subjects With Iron Deficiency Anemia (FERWON-IDA) [NCT02940886]Phase 31,512 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-08Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Erythropoietin And/Or Intravenous Iron Sucrose For Treatment of Anemia In Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-center Retrospective Study [NCT03917394]780 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-04-24Recruiting
Assessment of Safety of Iron Sucrose (Venofer) in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Cannot Tolerate Ferumoxytol (Feraheme) or Iron Dextran (INFed or Dexferrum) [NCT01151592]Phase 40 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor Decision)
Colorado-Oregon Altitude Study [NCT05734716]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-17Completed
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Goal-directed Iron Supplementation of Anemic, Critically Ill Trauma Patients With Functional Iron Deficiency, With and Without Oxandrolone [NCT02047552]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No Participants enrolled)
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-label, Comparative Safety and Efficacy Trial of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) and Iron Sucrose in Subjects With Iron Deficiency Anaemia and Non-dialysis-dependent Chronic Kidney Dis [NCT02940860]Phase 31,538 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-29Completed
Effects of Iron Loading and Iron Chelation Therapy on Innate Immunity During Human Endotoxemia [NCT01349699]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized Open-label Trial Cross-over Trial of Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) Compared With Iron Sucrose (Venofer®) in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients [NCT03610230]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Terminated(stopped due to Difficult patient recruitment due to COVID-19 epidemic)
Ferumoxytol Compared to Iron Sucrose Trial (FIRST): A Randomized, Multicenter, Trial of Ferumoxytol Compared to Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Adult Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT01052779]Phase 2162 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Patients With Hip Fracture to Prevent Perioperative Anemia [NCT01084122]Phase 4360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-31Not yet recruiting
Predictors of Response to Iron and Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents [NCT03658876]Phase 4197 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-03Completed
An Open-label, Randomised Controlled Multi-centre Study to Assess the Impact of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Correcting Iron Deficiency Anaemia Compared With Venofer® (Iron Sucrose) in Chinese Subjects [NCT03591406]Phase 3371 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-03Completed
Treatment of Anemia of Chronic Disease With True Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy [NCT03317210]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-01Completed
Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside Versus Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy: A Randomized Comparative Trial [NCT05251493]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-06Recruiting
Hospitalization and Mortality in Iron Deficient, Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney (CKD) and Heart Failure Receiving Intravenous Iron Therapy: A Five Year Follow-up From a Pilot Study [NCT02392910]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Iron Deficiency and Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 Regulation in Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure [NCT03106298]77 participants (Actual)Observational2015-12-18Completed
To Compare the Efficacy of I.V 200 mg Iron Sucrose and 500 mg Iron Sucrose to Treat Anemia in Pregnancy [NCT02441439]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to The investigators decided not to proceed with this study)
A Phase 1b Dose-escalating Study With RBT-1, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3b-4 [NCT03630029]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-15Withdrawn(stopped due to The trial has been enhanced, a new NCT(NCT03893799) listing was created.)
This is a Phase II Study on the Safety and Feasibility of Identifying the Intersegmental Plane of the Lung by Iron Sucrose Injection Staining,Both on the Pleural Surface and Lung Parenchyma [NCT03516500]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-09Completed
A Randomized Double-Blinded Phase II Study to Determine Treatment Protocol for Hemoglobin Optimization to Prevent Transfusion and Adverse Events in Perioperative Patients With Iron Restricted Anemia [NCT03528564]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-01Terminated(stopped due to The primary reasoning is that we were unable to demonstrate feasibility, prior to and because of the impact of COVID on our research programs.)
Fetal Vascular Hemodynamic Changes Before and After Treatment of Maternal Iron Deficiency Anemia [NCT03883841]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-05-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled Study to Investigate the Safety and Oxidative Stress Potential of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) vs. IV Iron Sucrose or IV Iron Dextran in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Women [NCT01290315]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Iron Replacement to Reduce Anemia During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT05800600]Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-15Recruiting
Physiology Study Investigating the Effects of Supplementation and Depletion of Iron on Hypoxia-related Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT00952302]33 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel-Design, Bioequivalence Study of Hospira Iron Sucrose Injection Compared to Venofer® Injection USP in Healthy Subjects. [NCT00719459]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-centered Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iron Sucrose (Venoferrum®) With Oral Iron Acetyl-transferrin Hydroglycerin (Bolgre®) in Pregnant Women With Iron Deficiency Anemia [NCT00802139]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Rationale and Design of Ferric Polymaltose Hydroxide and Iron Sucrose Evaluation on Performance and Oxydative Stress in Patient With Iron deficIency and Stable Heart Failure Study [NCT04225728]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Parenteral Nutrition With Iron Sucrose for Anemia in Preterm Infants: a Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study [NCT02743572]129 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Periodic Versus Continuous (at Every Session of Hemodialysis) iv Iron Supplementation in Chronic HD Patients [NCT02787824]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron for Severe Postpartum Anemia Randomized Trial [NCT00660933]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Perioperative Intravenous Iron With Erythropoietin for the Prevention of Postoperative Severe Anemia and Reduction of Transfusion in Bilateral Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty [NCT01012063]54 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Phase III Study of Z-213 in Subjects With Iron-deficiency Anemia [NCT02731534]Phase 3238 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Darbepoetin-alpha and i.v. Iron Administration After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation : a Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT00557817]Phase 2/Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) Levels in Hemodialysis (HD) Patients; Relation to Iron Status, Hemodialysis, and Intravenous (IV) Iron Administration [NCT00560976]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-12-31Recruiting
Low Dose Intravenous Versus Oral Iron for Iron Deficiency Anemia Starting Late in Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00746551]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Select A Multi-centre Randomised Prospective Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy & Safety of a Standardised Correction Dosage Regimen of i.v. Ferric Carboxymaltose Versus Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients With Infl [NCT00810030]Phase 3484 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Effect of Maternal Iron Deficiency Anemia on Fetal Hemodynamics and Neonatal Outcome [NCT04016922]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-07-31Not yet recruiting
Does Intraoperative Intravenous Iron Sucrose Enhance Postoperative Oxygenation Profile in Total Arthroplasty Surgery? [NCT02544828]Phase 476 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Not yet recruiting
Study of the Effects of Iron Supplementation on High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension. [NCT00960921]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Study never started.)
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Sucrose and Oral Iron Sulfate in Patients With Iron Deficiency. [NCT01067547]Phase 4130 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Continuous Versus Periodic Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients [NCT02198495]Phase 4143 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Comparison Between Outcomes of Pregnant Women Treated With Ferinject vs. Venofer for Iron Deficiency Anemia (Hb<9) [NCT06061393]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-30Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Systematic Intravenous Iron Supplementation During Darbepoetin Alfa Treatment in Prophylaxis of Severe Anaemia Chemo-Induced. [NCT00210002]Phase 255 participants Interventional2003-11-30Terminated
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety (Compared to Iron Sucrose), Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Ferumoxytol for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) in Pediatric Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) [NCT03619850]Phase 3129 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-13Recruiting
A Randomized Pilot Study of Ferric Carboxymaltose as Compared to Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Functional Iron Deficiency Associated With Surgical Critical Illness [NCT02009943]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Inadequate funds)
A Randomized Double-Blind Safety Comparison of Intravenous Iron Dextran Versus Iron Sucrose in an Adult Non-Hemodialysis Outpatient Population: A Pilot Study [NCT00593619]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Suspended(stopped due to Interim Analysis and review by Data Safety Monitoring Board)
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled, Trial Comparing Ferumoxytol With Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia [NCT01114204]Phase 3605 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-10Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Wait-list Control Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron in Older Adults With Unexplained Anemia and a Serum Ferritin Between 20 and 200 ng/mL [NCT01309659]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Enrollment)
Ferumoxytol for Anemia of CKD Trial (FACT): A Phase IV, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial, With MRI Substudy, of Repeated Doses of Ferumoxytol Compared With Iron Sucrose for Treatment of IDA in CKD Patients on Hemodialysis [NCT01227616]Phase 4296 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Bioequivalence Study Assessing a Single Dose of Iron Sucrose Injection (Baxter) or a Single Dose of Venofer® Injection in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT04155814]Phase 1196 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-19Completed
Iron Supplementation for Acute Anemia After Postbariatric Abdominoplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01857011]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Randomized Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia and Impaired Renal Function [NCT00981045]Phase 32,561 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of IV Iron on Proteinuria in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients [NCT00534144]Phase 174 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Effect of Lactoferrin Versus Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy [NCT05921968]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-30Not yet recruiting
Randomized Controlled Study of Iron Supplementation to Support the Response to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anaemia [NCT00482716]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Active, not recruiting
Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection) in Non-Dialysis Dependent (NDD-CKD) Pediatric Patients Receiving or Not Receiving Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA's) [NCT00721188]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Comparative, Open-label Study of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) Administered as Maintenance Therapy by Single or Repeated Bolus Injections in Comparison With Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Subjects With Stage 5 Chronic [NCT01222884]Phase 3351 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Phase 3 Study of Recombinant Erythropoetin and Adjuvant I.V. Iron Therapy of Anemic Patients With Lymphoproliferative Disorders [NCT00145652]Phase 366 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Randomised Controlled Study to Assess the Acute and Chronic Effects of Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Anaemic and Non-Anaemic Iron Deficient Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [NCT00125996]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants Interventional2004-07-31Recruiting
Open-label Multicenter, Pharmacokinetic Study of a Single Dose of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Adolescents on Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis Receiving Epoetin [NCT00239616]Phase 48 participants Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Assessment of the Use of Intravenous Iron Sucrose to Maintain Haemoglobin Levels and Delay the Onset of Use of Erythropoietic Agents and/or Dialysis in Stage 3/4 Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00202345]Phase 3120 participants Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Open Randomized Phase IV Study on Intravenous Iron in Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00204256]Phase 450 participants Interventional2004-03-31Active, not recruiting
ANEMEX UK Trial: Artificial Intelligence for Optimal Anemia Management in End-stage Renal Disease: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) Trial [NCT03214627]88 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-10Terminated(stopped due to Standard clinical practice at site caused unforeseen issues for the use of the ACM)
Randomized, Parallel Group, Clinical Trial Comparing Intravenous Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Ferrous Sulphate in the Treatment of Perioperative Iron Deficiency in Patients With Colo-Rectal Neoplasm and Iron Deficiency Anemia. [NCT00199277]Phase 4150 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Comparison of Oral Iron With IV Iron in Patients With Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure Not on Dialysis [NCT00236964]Phase 378 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase IV Study of Iron Indices' Kinetics in Hemodialysis Patients [NCT00308490]Phase 4160 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Chelated Oral Iron Versus Intravenous Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia Late in Pregnancy ( Randomized Controlled Trial ) [NCT05151679]0 participants Expanded AccessAvailable
Intravenous Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Ferrous Bis-glycinate for Treatment of Postpartum Iron Deficiency Anemia: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03009578]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
Prevention of Blood Transfusion With Intravenous Iron in Gynecologic Cancer Patients Receiving Platinum Based Chemotherapy [NCT01435200]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Intravenous Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Ferrous Sulfate in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease [NCT01438372]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was terminated prior to enrolling patients as we were unable to secure enough funding to complete the study.)
Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Induced by Iron Injection in Healthy Volunteers Versus Critical Care Patients [NCT01443624]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Ferumoxytol for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) in Pediatric Subjects [NCT03893045]Phase 375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-18Recruiting
The Safety of a High-Dose, Rapid Infusion of Iron Sucrose in a Non-Dialysis Dependent Population [NCT02977611]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to FDA Clinical Hold)
Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Iron Supplementation for Postoperative Rehabilitation of Geriatric Hip Fractures: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. [NCT05489952]Phase 4444 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-15Recruiting
Evaluation and Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT03933813]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-29Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in Chronic Renal Failure Subjects With Anemia [NCT00236977]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Iron Sucrose Intravenously to No Iron Treatment of Anemia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Erythropoietin Therapy [NCT00236951]Phase 3224 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Intravenous Iron Supplementation to Placebo for the Treatment of Anemia of Traumatic Critical Illness [NCT01180894]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Randomized Trial to Assess the Effects of Iron Supplementation in Heart Failure Patients With Anemia: The IRON-HF Study [NCT00386126]Phase 2/Phase 3117 participants Interventional2006-08-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded Clinical Trial of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Adolescents With Non-anemic Iron Deficiency and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) [NCT01978535]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty in recruiting subjects.)
A Randomized Cross-over Pilot Study of the Effect of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex vs. Iron Sucrose on Proteinuria in Non-dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients [NCT00354692]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
The Effects of Intravenous Iron Therapy for Anemia Correction in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure and Concomitant Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00384657]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of cooperation among centers, Financial reasons)
A Comparison Between Intravenous Iron Sucrose to Its Combination With Oral Iron Supplements for the Treatment of Postpartum Anemia [NCT02458625]158 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Predictors of Response to Treatment With Iron and Erythropoietin in Dialysis Anaemia [NCT02707757]Phase 4197 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
The Effectiveness of Oral Treatment With Liposomated Iron in Patients With Previous Bariatric Surgery Which Are Currently Receiving Chronic Parentheral Therapy With Iron [NCT02390921]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Crossover-design Bioequivalence Study With Pharmacokinetic Endpoints, Comparing a Single Dose of Iron Sucrose Azad Injection of Azad Pharma Corporation (AG), With a Single Dose of Venofer® Injection of Vifor Corporation (AG) in [NCT02391181]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) and Iron Sucrose in Subjects With Iron Deficiency Anaemia and Who Are Intolerant or Unresponsive to Oral Iron Therapy or Who Need Iron Rapidly (PROVIDE [NCT02130063]Phase 3511 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Three Iron Sucrose Maintenance Regimens in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients [NCT00239642]Phase 4141 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Heme Iron Polypeptide for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pre-Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study [NCT00318812]Phase 2/Phase 355 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Iron Sucrose In The Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS): The Safety of Three Dose Regimens as Evaluated by Clinical Assessments [NCT00895232]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
The Benefits of a Preoperative Anemia Management Program [NCT01888003]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated
Iron Sucrose Combined With rHuEPO and Ascorbic Acid on Perioperative Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Infusion in Patients Undergoing Elective Major Cardiac Surgery [NCT05353348]370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-15Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection USP) in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis [NCT00236938]Phase 3121 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Open-label, Randomized, Crossover-design Bioequivalence Study With Comparing a Single Dose of Ferrinemia® Injection With a Single Dose of Venofer® Injection of Vifor AG in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT03093883]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-13Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Patients With Non-anemic Iron Deficiency and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) [NCT04855266]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to recruit participants)
Effect of Iron Sucrose Combined With Human Erythropoietin and Vitamin C on Perioperative Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Infusion in Major Cardiac Surgery [NCT06012760]480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-30Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00236938 (4) [back to overview]The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Ferritin up to Day 71
NCT00236938 (4) [back to overview]The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Reticulocyte Count up to Day 71
NCT00236938 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Hemoglobin up to Day 71
NCT00236938 (4) [back to overview]The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) up to Day 71
NCT00236951 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the Maximum Hemoglobin Level During Stage 2 (Week 9 Through Week 21).
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Highest Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) up to Day 56
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) at Day 56
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) (%) at Day 56
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change in Ferritin (ng/mL) From Baseline to Day 56
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With a Clinical Response
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Patients With an Increase in Hemoglobin >= 1gm/dL.
NCT00236977 (7) [back to overview]Highest Change From Baseline in Ferritin (ng/mL) up to Day 56
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Subjects With Hemoglobin Between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Subjects With TSAT Between 20% and 50%, Inclusive
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Safety Profile: Number of Subjects Experiencing at Least 1 Adverse Event
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) Between 20% and 50%, Inclusive
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Stable Erythropoietin (EPO) Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO Dose From Baseline
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Subjects With Stable EPO Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO Dose From Baseline
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success
NCT00239642 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Hemoglobin Between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive
NCT00318812 (3) [back to overview]Ferritin
NCT00318812 (3) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Concentration at 6 Months
NCT00318812 (3) [back to overview]Transferrin Saturation
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Rate Constant (λz)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vdss)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution Based on the Terminal Phase (Vdarea)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (Cl)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Serum Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Mean Residence Time (MRtime)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Initial Volume of Distribution (Vdc)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time of Dosing to the Last Quantifiable Measurable Serum Concentration (AUC 0-last)
NCT00721188 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
NCT00746551 (2) [back to overview]Haemoglobin Level
NCT00746551 (2) [back to overview]Serum Ferritin Level
NCT00895232 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Day 84 for International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) Scale
NCT00895232 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Day 84 for Total Periodic Limb Movements (PLM's)
NCT00895232 (3) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Subjects Responding to Treatment From Baseline to Day 84 Based on Global Assessments by the Examiner.
NCT00981045 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Event in the Primary Composite Safety Endpoint in the Randomized Population.
NCT00981045 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Observed Hemoglobin Any Time From Baseline to End of Study.
NCT01052779 (2) [back to overview]Percentage Of Participants With An Increase In Hemoglobin ≥1.0 g/dL From Day 1 (Baseline) To Week 5
NCT01052779 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change In Hemoglobin From Baseline (Day 1) To Week 5
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Time To Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥2.0 g/dL Or Hemoglobin Value Of ≥12.0 g/dL From Baseline
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Participants Who Achieved A ≥2.0 g/dL Increase In Hemoglobin At Any Time From Baseline To Week 5
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Participants Achieving A Hemoglobin Level ≥12.0 g/dL At Any Time From Baseline To Week 5
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change In TSAT From Baseline To Week 5
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change In Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score From Baseline To Week 5
NCT01114204 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change In Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 5
NCT01180894 (4) [back to overview]RBC Transfusion
NCT01180894 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Who Died
NCT01180894 (4) [back to overview]Iron-deficient Erythropoeisis (IDE)
NCT01180894 (4) [back to overview]Infection
NCT01222884 (2) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin Concentration
NCT01222884 (2) [back to overview]Ability to Maintain Hemoglobin Level
NCT01227616 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With an Increase in Hemoglobin of ≥1.0 g/dL at Any Time From TP Baseline to Week 5 for Each TP
NCT01227616 (3) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Changes
NCT01227616 (3) [back to overview]Changes in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT)
NCT01290315 (4) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)
NCT01290315 (4) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)
NCT01290315 (4) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)
NCT01290315 (4) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Frailty Component Related to Fatigue/ Exhaustion
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in Hemoglobin (HB)
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Results
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Complex Attention/Executive Processing
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Learning and Memory
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Speed of Processing
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Trail Making Test Part B
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Frailty Component as Determined by Grip Strength
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Frailty Component as Determined by the 4 Meter Walk Speed
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by FACIT-AN Total Score
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS)
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Change in the Frailty Component as Determined by Self-reported Activity Level
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in HB From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in the 6 Meter Walk Test Distance
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in Hemoglobin
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
NCT01309659 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had a Hemoglobin Increase >= 1g/dL
NCT01888003 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Blood Transfusions After Surgery and Prior to Discharge From Hospital
NCT01888003 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Requiring at Least One Blood Transfusion During Surgery.
NCT02130063 (4) [back to overview]Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT)
NCT02130063 (4) [back to overview]Change in Hb Concentration
NCT02130063 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an Haemoglobin (Hb) Increase of ≥ 2 g/dL From Baseline at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 5
NCT02130063 (4) [back to overview]Change in Serum (s)-Ferritin Concentration
NCT02707757 (1) [back to overview]Haemoglobin Increase of Greater or Equal to 5g/l Following Receipt of Treatment
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥1 g/dL
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration Increase of ≥1 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in S-ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Change in Concentration of S-iron From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940860 (20) [back to overview]Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥2 g/dL
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in S-ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Change in Concentrations of Serum Iron (S-iron) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions
NCT02940886 (20) [back to overview]Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL at Any Time up to Week 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT03591406 (12) [back to overview]Body Weight at Baseline and Week 8
NCT03658876 (1) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Incrementation

The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Ferritin up to Day 71

(NCT00236938)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 71

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Group A: Venofer and Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose545.05
Group B: Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose Only70.523

[back to top]

The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Reticulocyte Count up to Day 71

(NCT00236938)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 71

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Group A: Venofer and Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose0.7226
Group B: Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose Only0.4630

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Hemoglobin up to Day 71

(NCT00236938)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 71

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Group A: Venofer and Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose1.3
Group B: Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose Only.7

[back to top]

The Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) up to Day 71

(NCT00236938)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 71

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Group A: Venofer and Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose18.176
Group B: Erythropoietin EPO Fixed Dose Only10.383

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the Maximum Hemoglobin Level During Stage 2 (Week 9 Through Week 21).

The hemoglobin baseline was defined as the average of the last 2 hemoglobin values during stage 1 (through week 8). (NCT00236951)
Timeframe: During Stage 2 (week 9 through week 21)

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Group A: Erythropoietin + Venofer (Responders)2.6
Group B: Erythropoietin Only (Responders)1.8
Group C: Erythropoietin + Venofer (Non-responders)2.5
Group D: Erythropoietin Only (Non-responders)1.3

[back to top]

Highest Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) up to Day 56

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 56

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Venofer1.1
Ferrous Sulfate.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) at Day 56

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline at Day 56

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Venofer.7
Ferrous Sulfate.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) (%) at Day 56

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline at Day 56

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Venofer8.5
Ferrous Sulfate5.5

[back to top]

Mean Change in Ferritin (ng/mL) From Baseline to Day 56

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline at Day 56

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Venofer230
Ferrous Sulfate30

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With a Clinical Response

Clinical Response (change in Hemoblobin (Hgb) >= 1gm/dL and change in ferritin >= 160ng/ml) (NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 56

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer31
Ferrous Sulfate1

[back to top]

Patients With an Increase in Hemoglobin >= 1gm/dL.

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 56

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer35
Ferrous Sulfate23

[back to top]

Highest Change From Baseline in Ferritin (ng/mL) up to Day 56

(NCT00236977)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline up to Day 56

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Venofer391.7
Ferrous Sulfate45

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success

Summary of the Number of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success During the 12-Week Study Period - Hemoglobin between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive, TSAT between 20% and 50%, Inclusive, and Stable EPO Dosing (±25% of Baseline Dose) (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)44
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)40
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)33

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Hemoglobin Between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive

Summary of the Percentage (%) of Subjects with Hemoglobin Between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)100.0
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)95.6
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)95.0

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Subjects With TSAT Between 20% and 50%, Inclusive

Summary of the Percentage (%) of Subjects with TSAT between 20% and 50%, Inclusive (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)95.7
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)93.3
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)92.5

[back to top]

Safety Profile: Number of Subjects Experiencing at Least 1 Adverse Event

Safety Profile: Number of subjects who experienced at least 1 adverse event in each arm (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: baseline through week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)27
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)25
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)26

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) Between 20% and 50%, Inclusive

Summary of the Proportion of Subjects with transferrin saturation (TSAT) between 20% and 50%, Inclusive (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)44
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)42
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)37

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Stable Erythropoietin (EPO) Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO Dose From Baseline

Summary of the Proportion of Subjects with Stable erythropoietin (EPO) Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO dose from Baseline (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)46
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)45
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)39

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Stable EPO Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO Dose From Baseline

Summary of the Percentage (%) of Subjects with Stable EPO Dosing or a Decrease >25% in EPO Dose from Baseline (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)100.0
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)100.0
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)97.5

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success

Summary of the Percentage (%) of Subjects Achieving Clinical Success During the 12-Week Study Period - Hemoglobin between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive, TSAT between 20% and 50%, Inclusive, and stable EPO Dosing (±25% of Baseline Dose) (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12 week post-baseline period

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)95.7
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)88.9
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)82.5

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Hemoglobin Between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive

Summary of the Number of Subjects with Hemoglobin between 10.5 g/dL and 14.0 g/dL, Inclusive (NCT00239642)
Timeframe: anytime during the 12-week post-baseline period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (0.5 mg/kg)46
Venofer (1.0 mg/kg)43
Venofer (2.0 mg/kg)38

[back to top]

Ferritin

Comparison of Ferritin at 6 months between the 2 Groups (NCT00318812)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionug/L (Median)
Heme Iron85.5
Iron Sucrose244

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Concentration at 6 Months

(NCT00318812)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiong/L (Median)
Heme Iron117
Iron Sucrose113

[back to top]

Transferrin Saturation

Comparison of Transferrin Saturation between the Groups (NCT00318812)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionpercentage of bound iron sites (Median)
Heme Iron21.5
Iron Sucrose21.5

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Rate Constant (λz)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)0.15

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vdss)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

InterventiondL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)40.27

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution Based on the Terminal Phase (Vdarea)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

InterventiondL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)63.83

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (Cl)

Total body clearance: Cl = Dose/Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC 0-∞) (NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours.

InterventiondL/hour (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)6.03

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionhour (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)0.56

[back to top]

Serum Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionhour (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)8.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Day of initial treatment with Venofer through 30 days after study treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)0

[back to top]

Mean Residence Time (MRtime)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionhour (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)7.16

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionug/dL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)8545.33

[back to top]

Initial Volume of Distribution (Vdc)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

InterventiondL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)22.46

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time of Dosing to the Last Quantifiable Measurable Serum Concentration (AUC 0-last)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionug*hr/dL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)31304.84

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

(NCT00721188)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours.

Interventionug/dL (Mean)
Venofer (Iron Sucrose Injection)36293.39

[back to top]

Haemoglobin Level

(NCT00746551)
Timeframe: 3 weeks after intervention

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Iron Sucrose, Venofer, Intravenous Drug10.6
Ferrous Fumarate, Ferri-6, Oral Tablet10.2

[back to top]

Serum Ferritin Level

(NCT00746551)
Timeframe: 3 weeks after intervention

Interventionµg/dL (Mean)
Iron Sucrose, Venofer, Intravenous Drug136.1
Ferrous Fumarate, Ferri-6, Oral Tablet28.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Day 84 for International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) Scale

Validated rating scale of RLS symptoms (Range 1 [mild] - 40 [severe]) (NCT00895232)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cohort I (Venofer 500mg x 1 Dose)-2.4
Cohort II (Venofer 500mg X 2 Doses)-14.3
Cohort III (Venofer 500mg x 2 Doses)-16.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Day 84 for Total Periodic Limb Movements (PLM's)

Quantifies amount of leg movement (NCT00895232)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84

InterventionPLM's per hour (Mean)
Cohort I (Venofer 500mg x 1 Dose)-7.2
Cohort II (Venofer 500mg X 2 Doses)-75.0
Cohort III (Venofer 500mg x 2 Doses)-96.2

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Subjects Responding to Treatment From Baseline to Day 84 Based on Global Assessments by the Examiner.

Response is defined as any effect based on a scale of 0 through 4 where 0 = no effect, 1 = mild effect, 2 = moderate effect, 3 = marked effect, and 4 = dramatic effect. (NCT00895232)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Cohort I (Venofer 500mg x 1 Dose)28.6
Cohort II (Venofer 500mg X 2 Doses)66.7
Cohort III (Venofer 500mg x 2 Doses)66.7

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Event in the Primary Composite Safety Endpoint in the Randomized Population.

The primary composite safety endpoint was defined as death due to any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization or medical intervention, arrhythmias, protocol-defined hypersensitive events, and protocol-defined hyposensitive events. (NCT00981045)
Timeframe: Day 120

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)175
Iron Sucrose (Venofer)156

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the Highest Observed Hemoglobin Any Time From Baseline to End of Study.

(NCT00981045)
Timeframe: Day 56

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)1.13
Iron Sucrose (Venofer)0.92

[back to top]

Percentage Of Participants With An Increase In Hemoglobin ≥1.0 g/dL From Day 1 (Baseline) To Week 5

The percentage of participants who achieved a ≥1.0 g/dL increase in hemoglobin at any time from Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 5 by treatment group is presented by study visit. Baseline hemoglobin for each participant was the Day 1 hemoglobin value (prior to injection of the study drug). (NCT01052779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 5

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5
Ferumoxytol20323740
Iron Sucrose11203134

[back to top]

Mean Change In Hemoglobin From Baseline (Day 1) To Week 5

"The change in hemoglobin from Baseline (Day 1) to Week 5 was calculated for each participant as:~Hemoglobin Change = Hemoglobin (Week 5) - Hemoglobin (Baseline)~The least squares mean, with standard error, is reported as g/deciliter (dL). Baseline hemoglobin for each participant was the Day 1 hemoglobin value (prior to injection of the study drug). The screening hemoglobin value was used for any participants with missing Baseline (Day 1) hemoglobin. Analysis used last observed carried forward (LOCF) imputation methods for missing values for the ITT population. Sensitivity analyses were performed without imputation for missing data and with the Markov chain Monte Carlo method." (NCT01052779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5

,
Interventiong/dL (Least Squares Mean)
With LOCF ImputationWithout Imputation (Sensitivity Analysis)
Ferumoxytol0.840.89
Iron Sucrose0.740.80

[back to top]

Time To Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥2.0 g/dL Or Hemoglobin Value Of ≥12.0 g/dL From Baseline

The time to hemoglobin increase of ≥2.0 g/dL or hemoglobin value of ≥12.0 g/dL was defined as the days from Baseline (Day 1) to the first time the participant had an increase in hemoglobin of ≥2.0 g/dL or hemoglobin value of ≥12.0 g/dL, and was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Participants who did not have a hemoglobin increase of ≥2.0 g/dL or to a hemoglobin level ≥12.0 g/dL were censored at their last visit day. Participants without any post-Baseline study visits were not included. (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 5

Interventiondays (Mean)
Ferumoxytol23.1
Iron Sucrose25.2

[back to top]

Participants Who Achieved A ≥2.0 g/dL Increase In Hemoglobin At Any Time From Baseline To Week 5

"Participants who achieved a ≥2.0 g/dL increase in hemoglobin at any time from Baseline up to Week 5 are presented. Increase in hemoglobin at any time from Baseline up to Week 5 was calculated for each participant based on:~Hemoglobin Change = Hemoglobin (Week X) - Hemoglobin (Baseline), where Week X was any post-Baseline visit up to and including Week 5.~Baseline was defined as the Day 1 value (prior to injection of study drug). The screening or most recent value prior to Day 1 was used for any participant with missing Day 1 information. Participants with no post-Baseline hemoglobin values were classified as not achieving a ≥2.0 g/dL increase.~Statistical analysis was performed for data up to Week 5 only." (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 5

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Up to Week 3Up to Week 4Up to Week 5
Ferumoxytol291327341
Iron Sucrose117145162

[back to top]

Participants Achieving A Hemoglobin Level ≥12.0 g/dL At Any Time From Baseline To Week 5

"Participants who achieved a ≥12.0 g/dL hemoglobin level at any time from Baseline up to Week 5 are presented. Increase in hemoglobin at any time from Baseline up to Week 5 was calculated for each participant based on:~Hemoglobin Change = Hemoglobin (Week X) - Hemoglobin (Baseline), where Week X was any post-Baseline visit up to and including Week 5. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 value (prior to injection of study drug). The screening or most recent value prior to Day 1 was used for any participant with missing Day 1 information. Participants without any post-Baseline hemoglobin values were treated as non-responders." (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 5

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Up to Week 3Up to Week 4Up to Week 5
Ferumoxytol123210271
Iron Sucrose336796

[back to top]

Mean Change In TSAT From Baseline To Week 5

"Mean change in TSAT from Baseline to Week 5 was calculated for each participant as: TSAT Change = TSAT (Week 5) - TSAT (Baseline).~Baseline was defined as the Day 1 value (prior to injection of study drug). The screening or most recent value prior to Day 1 was used for any participant with missing Day 1 information. If the Week 5 TSAT value was missing, the change from Baseline was imputed to be zero." (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5

Interventionpercentage of saturation (Mean)
Ferumoxytol15.7
Iron Sucrose11.9

[back to top]

Mean Change In Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score From Baseline To Week 5

"The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a 13 item questionnaire designed and validated to specifically assess the presence and impact of treatment on fatigue and related symptoms, such as tiredness, on health-related quality of life in anemic participants with cancer. The questionnaire has 13 items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Scoring ranges from 0 (the most fatigued) to 52 (the least fatigued) points, with higher scores representing better functioning or less fatigue.~Mean change in FACIT-Fatigue Score from Baseline to Week 5 was calculated for each participant as:~FACIT-Fatigue Score Change = FACIT-Fatigue Score (Week 5) - FACIT-Fatigue Score (Baseline).~Baseline was defined as the Day 1 value (prior to first dose of study drug).The screening or most recent value prior to Day 1 was used for any participant with missing Day 1 information. If the Week 5 FACIT-Fatigue Score value was missing, the change from Baseline was imputed to be zero." (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ferumoxytol13.1
Iron Sucrose12.4

[back to top]

Mean Change In Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 5

"Mean change in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5 was calculated for each participant as: Hemoglobin Change = Hemoglobin (Week 5) - Hemoglobin (Baseline).~Baseline was defined as the Day 1 value (prior to injection of study drug). The screening or most recent value prior to Day 1 was used for any participant with missing Day 1 information. If the Week 5 hemoglobin value was missing, the change from Baseline was imputed to be zero." (NCT01114204)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Ferumoxytol2.9
Iron Sucrose2.7

[back to top]

RBC Transfusion

The number of participants who underwent RBC transfusion. (NCT01180894)
Timeframe: 42 Days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Iron Sucrose47
Placebo55

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Who Died

(NCT01180894)
Timeframe: 28 Days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Iron Sucrose7
Placebo2

[back to top]

Iron-deficient Erythropoeisis (IDE)

An elevated eZPP is diagnostic of Iron-deficient erythropoiesis (IDE) and reflects the bone marrow iron supply regardless of total body iron. (NCT01180894)
Timeframe: 14 Days

Interventionmicro mol: mol heme (Mean)
Iron Sucrose118
Placebo118

[back to top]

Infection

"The number of participants with at least one infection.~Specific infections analyzed included VAP (Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia), bacteremia, and urinary tract infection (UTI)." (NCT01180894)
Timeframe: 28 Days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Iron Sucrose1
Placebo1

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin Concentration

(NCT01222884)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Iron Isomaltoside 1000-0.07
Iron Sucrose-0.06

[back to top]

Ability to Maintain Hemoglobin Level

The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects who were able to maintain haemoglobin between 9.5 and 12.5 g/dL (both values included) at week 6. Haemoglobin was measured by a blood sample at the different visits. All blood samples were taken before the dialysis from the dialysis catheter. Intravenous iron was administered during dialysis, at least 30 min after the start and at least 1 h before the end of dialysis. (NCT01222884)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Iron Isomaltoside 100082.7
Iron Sucrose82.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With an Increase in Hemoglobin of ≥1.0 g/dL at Any Time From TP Baseline to Week 5 for Each TP

The proportion of subjects by group achieving a ≥1.0 g/dL increase in hemoglobin at any point during each 5-week treatment period. (NCT01227616)
Timeframe: Up to 6 treatment periods (5 weeks per treatment period)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TP1TP2TP3TP4TP5TP6
Ferumoxytol55554220135
Iron Sucrose2313191031

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Changes

Changes in the mean hemoglobin between Baseline and Week 5 for ferumoxytol and iron sucrose in each treatment period. (NCT01227616)
Timeframe: Up to 6 treatment periods (5 weeks per treatment period)

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
TP1TP2TP3TP4TP5TP6
Ferumoxytol0.50.60.60.50.40.5
Iron Sucrose0.40.30.40.60.3-0.3

[back to top]

Changes in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT)

Mean change in TSAT from TP Baseline to Week 5 for each TP (NCT01227616)
Timeframe: Up to 6 treatment periods (5 weeks per treatment period)

,
InterventionPercent (Mean)
TP1TP2TP3TP4TP5TP6
Ferumoxytol6.68.28.59.86.37.1
Iron Sucrose9.511.39.110.014.45.1

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)

(NCT01290315)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 24 hours post end IV infusion

,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Carbonyl8-isoprostane
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort I8.63198.67
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort II8.94-23.96
Iron Dextran Cohort II-11.5738.02
Iron Sucrose Cohort I-6.92119.26

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)

(NCT01290315)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Day 30

,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Carbonyl8-isoprostane
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort I-11.90141.46
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort II-12.378.83
Iron Dextran Cohort II-11.1432.28
Iron Sucrose Cohort I-1.06-369.50

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)

(NCT01290315)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to Day 7 post end IV infusion

,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Carbonyl8-isoprostane
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort I11.69263.52
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort II-18.20-29.35
Iron Dextran Cohort II-12.10-58.04
Iron Sucrose Cohort I-24.03-417.89

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Carbonyl and 8-isoprostane)

(NCT01290315)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 2 hours post end IV infusion

,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Carbonyl8-isoprostane
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort I2.07151.59
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Cohort II-8.66-2.64
Iron Dextran Cohort II-5.98-5.92
Iron Sucrose Cohort I6.05-420.02

[back to top] [back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance

Correlation between baseline serum ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation and the change in 6 Minute Walk Test distance from baseline to 12 weeks. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Correlation for ferritinCorrelation for ironCorrelation TSAT
Immediate Intervention Group0.6170.3320.400
Wait List Control0.100-0.133-0.350

[back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in Hemoglobin (HB)

Correlation between baseline serum ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation and the change in HB from baseline to 12 weeks. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Correlation btw baseline ferritin & change in HgbCorrelation btw baseline iron & change in HgbCorrelation btw baseline TST & change in Hgb
Immediate Intervention Group0.3830.3230.200
Wait List Control0.1890.5410.584

[back to top]

Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Results

Subjects were asked to walk for 6 minutes, unassisted. The distance walked was recorded in meters at baseline (time of randomization) and 12 weeks after baseline (time of randomization). The change from baseline to 12 weeks, related to distance, is compared and documented. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group8.05
Wait List Control-11.45

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Complex Attention/Executive Processing

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on Complex attention/executive processing was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) TMT Part B seconds per completed circle, (2) time score from the CogState One Back Task, and (3) accuracy score from the CogState One Back Task. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the overall baseline mean of the test from the subject's score at the time point (accuracy score) or by subtracting the subject's score at the time point from the overall baseline mean of the test (TMT and time score) and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 week

Interventionchange in Z-score (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group0.36
Wait List Control0.69

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Learning and Memory

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on Learning and memory was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) CogState ISL immediate recall score (total score from three learning trials), (2) CogState ISL immediate recall score from the first learning trial, and (3) CogState ISL delayed recall scores. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the overall baseline mean of the test from the subject's score at the time point and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test. Higher numbers indicated a better response.There is no scale, as the results are normalized variables. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 week

Interventionchange in Z-score (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group0.41
Wait List Control1.39

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Speed of Processing

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on speed of processing was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) TMT Part A seconds per completed circle, (2) simple reaction time from the CogState Detection Task, and (3) choice reaction time from the CogState Identification Task. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the subject's score at the time point from the overall baseline mean of the test and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test. Positive z-scores indicate a better performance compared to the baseline average. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Week

Interventionchange in Z-Score (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group0.62
Wait List Control1.08

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Trail Making Test Part B

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on the Trail Making Test (TMT) Part B as measured by subjects drawing a line from 25 circled numbers to letters in 300 seconds. The change in seconds per completed circle from baseline to week 12. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionchange in seconds per completed circle (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group-0.77
Wait List Control-4.96

[back to top]

Change in Frailty Component as Determined by Grip Strength

"To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the frailty as measured by change in grip strength. Subjects squeeze the grip strength machine 3 times with each hand. For the frailty outcome the maximum grip strength from the dominant hand is used. (change from frail at baseline to not frail at week 12). Grip strength is stratified by gender and BMI. For men with (BMI <= 24 and a grip strength (GS) <= 29) or (BMI 24.1-28 and grip strength <= 30) or (BMI >28 and a grip strength <= 32) were classified as frail. For women with (BMI <= 23 and a grip strength of <= 17) or (BMI 23.1-26 and a GS <= 17.3) or (BMI 26.1-29 and a GS <= 18) or (BMI > 29 and a GS <= 21) were classified as frail.The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as frail at baseline and changed to not frail at week 12." (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group0
Wait List Control0

[back to top]

Change in Frailty Component as Determined by the 4 Meter Walk Speed

"To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the speed of the 4 meter walk speed. Subjects are asked to walk as fast as they can for 4 meters. Frailty was determined by the subject's speed. (change from frail at baseline to not frail at week 12). 4 m walking speed is stratified by gender and height. For men, (height of <= 173 cm and a walking speed of <= 0.65 meter/sec) or a (height > 173, <= .76 meter/sec) were classified as frail. For women, (height of <= 159 cm and a walking speed of <=.65 meter/sec) or (height >159 cm <= 0.76 meter/sec) were classified as frail.The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as frail at baseline and changed to not frail at week 12." (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group0
Wait List Control0

[back to top]

Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by FACIT-AN Total Score

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on self -reported outcomes measures by subjects answering 47 questions for patients with anemia and or fatigue. This test detects self-report functional changes and QoL. Change from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores range from 0-188 with higher scores indicating better function. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionchange in the total score (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group10.6
Wait List Control0.0

[back to top]

Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS)

To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on self-reported outcomes measures by change in SF36 physical component score. The SF-36 form identifies self-report physical function and global measure of quality of life and is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey consisting of 36 questions. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 that correlates with physical health domains of the SF-36 ( Physical Function, Role-Physical, and Bodily Pain). The change is calculated and compared from baseline to week 12. The SF-36 PCS score is a norm based sore with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 where results above and below 50 are above and below the average, respectively, in the 2009 general US population. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventiont score (Mean)
Immediate Intervention Group-1.89
Wait List Control-3.17

[back to top]

Change in the Frailty Component as Determined by Self-reported Activity Level

"To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the frailty as measured by change in self-reported activity level. Frailty for activity level is classified by subjects responses to 6physical activity questions on the short version of the Minnesota Leisure Time Activity Questionnaire , were related to walking for exercise, moderately strenuous outdoor chores, dancing, bowling, and regular exercise. The Women's Health And Aging Study (WHAS) scoring algorithm was used to define frailty for self-reported activity level. The answers to these questions were used to calculate kilocalories (Kcals) per week, using the WHAS algorithm, which is further satisfied by by gender. For men, Kcals < 128 per week is frail. For women, Kcals < 90 per week is frail. This is a categorical measurement of yes or no. The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as frail at baseline and changed to not frail at week 12." (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 week

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group0
Wait List Control0

[back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in HB From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor and the change in hemoglobin from the baseline to 12 weeks. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group-0.192
Wait List Control-0.886

[back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in the 6 Meter Walk Test Distance

Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor and the change in the 6 Meter Walk Test distance from baseline to 12 weeks (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group0.192
Wait List Control0.349

[back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in Hemoglobin

Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor index (soluble receptor/log ferritin) and the change in hemoglobin from baseline to 12 weeks. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group-0.500
Wait List Control-0.714

[back to top]

Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance

Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor index (soluble receptor/log ferritin) and the change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance from baseline to 12 weeks (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group-0.300
Wait List Control0.486

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had a Hemoglobin Increase >= 1g/dL

To assess the efficacy of IV iron sucrose in improving Hemoglobin by at least 1 g/dL; an increase from baseline to week 12. (NCT01309659)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Immediate Intervention Group1
Wait List Control0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Blood Transfusions After Surgery and Prior to Discharge From Hospital

Number of subjects that had at least 1 blood transfusion from the end of surgery until discharge from hospital (NCT01888003)
Timeframe: post surgery through discharge, an average of 2 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Anemia Treatment Group (AMG)0
Conventional Treatment Group (CTG)1
Non Anemia Group (NAG)0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Requiring at Least One Blood Transfusion During Surgery.

The number of subjects who had blood transfusions (at least 1) during surgery (NCT01888003)
Timeframe: During surgery (less than 1 day)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Anemia Treatment Group (AMG)0
Conventional Treatment Group (CTG)0
Non Anemia Group (NAG)0

[back to top]

Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT)

(NCT02130063)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 5

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 5
Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®)15.717.916.315.6
Iron Sucrose (Venofer®)3.35.711.511.8

[back to top]

Change in Hb Concentration

(NCT02130063)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 2, 4 and 5

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 5
Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®)1.562.352.52
Iron Sucrose (Venofer®)0.871.742.05

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an Haemoglobin (Hb) Increase of ≥ 2 g/dL From Baseline at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 5

"The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was the count of subjects with an Hb increase of ≥ 2 g/dL from baseline at any time from week 1 to week 5. 'Any time' implied that if the endpoint was met at a time-point prior to or at week 5, the effect (increase of ≥ 2 g/dL) did not have to be maintained throughout the trial in order for a subject to be a responder.~Number of responders (i.e. a subject with increase in Hb ≥ 2 g/dL from baseline at any time from week 1 to week 5) and percentages according to number of subjects in the analysis set were summarised." (NCT02130063)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®)226
Iron Sucrose (Venofer®)83

[back to top]

Change in Serum (s)-Ferritin Concentration

(NCT02130063)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 5

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 5
Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®)431.2516.6285.3241.2
Iron Sucrose (Venofer®)86.9126.2195.0185.7

[back to top]

Haemoglobin Increase of Greater or Equal to 5g/l Following Receipt of Treatment

(NCT02707757)
Timeframe: 2 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Sucrose53
Neorecormon61

[back to top]

Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Changes in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose12.105.844.995.10
Iron Sucrose4.315.645.595.93

[back to top]

Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥1 g/dL

"Efficacy~Time to change in Hb concentration ≥1 g/dL.~Subjects who showed Hb concentration increase of ≥1 g/dL (from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8).~For responders, time to Hb response was defined as the scheduled time from baseline until the visit where the first Hb response was measured." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionDays (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose56
Iron Sucrose56

[back to top]

S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Safety~Results show the number of participants who had s-phosphate <2 mg/dL at any time from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose32
Iron Sucrose4

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8

"Efficacy~Evaluate the effect of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose vs iron sucrose in subjects with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA).~Response was defined as change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) to week 8, i.e. ability to increase Hb in subjects with NDD-CKD and IDA, when oral iron preparations were ineffective or could not be used, or in whom the Hb measurement at screening in Investigators' opinion were sufficiently low to require rapid repletion of iron stores." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

Interventiong/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose1.22
Iron Sucrose1.14

[back to top]

Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)

"Safety~Results show the composite cardiovascular AEs, that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent) up to week 8.~The reported potential cardiovascular AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC).~The potential cardiovascular AEs included the following:~Death due to any cause~Non-fatal myocardial infarction~Non-fatal stroke~Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation~Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalisation or medical intervention~Arrhythmias~Hypertension~Hypotension~Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed treatment-emergent composite cardiovascular AEs." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose42
Iron Sucrose35

[back to top]

Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4

"Efficacy~Change in Hb concentration from baseline to week 1, 2, and 4." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 4

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose0.440.771.08
Iron Sucrose0.210.500.90

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmiles (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose19.0
Iron Sucrose18.0

[back to top]

Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose307
Iron Sucrose133

[back to top]

Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.~Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose259
Iron Sucrose121

[back to top]

Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions

"Safety~For this endpoint, the number of participants with serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions were evaluated. The hypersensitivity reactions that were included in the analysis were those that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent). The terms used to define hypersensitivity were those specified by the Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQ) for hypersensitivity, plus four additional terms: loss of consciousness, seizure, syncope, unresponsiveness.~The potential hypersensitivity AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC).~Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose3
Iron Sucrose0

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Time spent on visitTotal time spent helping on visit
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose2.002.00
Iron Sucrose2.002.00

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
In employment, YESTook time off work to attend, YESAssistance by others to attend visit, YESOthers took time off work to attend, YES
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose1527041082
Iron Sucrose572619740

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionUS dollars ($) (Median)
Cost of public transport/taxiCost of parking
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose0.00.0
Iron Sucrose0.00.0

[back to top]

Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire

"Pharmacoeconomics~Resources used by the health care staff (per administration), measured by the health care resource use questionnaire.~The questionnaire assessed the time used by the health care staff during administration of the investigational product and the administration time (including the observational time). The health care participants included in the evaluation were: investigator, pharmacist, physician, study coordinator, study nurse.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different (i.e. up to a factor 5 more frequent in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Time spent per site staffTime spent per subject
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose1.172.58
Iron Sucrose1.002.33

[back to top]

Hb Concentration Increase of ≥1 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Results show Hb responders to the treatment. A subject was considered a Hb responder to a certain week if an increase in Hb of at least 1 g/dL from baseline to the week in question was observed (from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8)." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responder YES week 1Responder YES week 2Responder YES week 4Responder YES week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose200339430474
Iron Sucrose78112174226

[back to top]

S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Proportion of subjects reaching the composite endpoint of s-ferritin concentration ≥100 ng/mL and TSAT of 20-50% at any time from week 1 to 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose873
Iron Sucrose388

[back to top]

Change in S-ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Changes in s-ferritin from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose492.4381.2258.4191.3
Iron Sucrose183.9292.4255.4187.9

[back to top]

Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8

"Efficacy~Change in fatigue symptoms from baseline to week 1, 2, and 8 was measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale.~The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale consisted of 13 items ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except items #7 and #8 which are reversed scored. The total score range is 0-52.~A score of less than 30 indicated severe fatigue, and the higher the score, the better outcome/quality of life (QoL). If more than 50% of the items for a subject at a given visit were missing, the total score was not calculated.~Total score was calculated as shown below:~Total score= Sum of individual scores x 13 / Number of items answered" (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose5.047.299.13
Iron Sucrose5.017.639.07

[back to top]

Change in Concentration of S-iron From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Changes in the concentrations of serum iron (s-iron) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionμg/dL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose34.811.16.57.1
Iron Sucrose11.112.410.212.4

[back to top]

Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE

"Safety~Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit. Only the adjudicated and confirmed composite cardiovascular safety AEs, as judged by the CEAC, were considered for this endpoint.~Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit." (NCT02940860)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionWeek (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric DerisomaltoseNA
Iron SucroseNA

[back to top]

Composite Cardiovascular Adverse Events (AEs)

"Safety~Results show the composite cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent) up to week 8.~The reported potential cardiovascular AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC).~The potential cardiovascular AEs included the following:~Death due to any cause~Non-fatal myocardial infarction~Non-fatal stroke~Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation~Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalisation or medical intervention~Arrhythmias~Hypertension~Hypotension~Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed treatment-emergent composite cardiovascular AEs." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose8
Iron Sucrose6

[back to top]

Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose687
Iron Sucrose340

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Cost of Public Transport/Taxi And Parking

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionUS dollars ($) (Median)
Cost of public transport/taxiCost of parking
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose5.00.0
Iron Sucrose5.00.0

[back to top]

Time to Change in Hb Concentration ≥2 g/dL

"Efficacy~Time to change in Hb concentration ≥2 g/dL. Subjects who achieved Hb concentration increase of ≥2 g/dL (from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8).~For responders, time to Hb response was defined as the scheduled time from baseline until the visit where the first Hb response was measured." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionDays (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose28
Iron Sucrose28

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Time Spent on Visit/Helping on Visit

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Time spent on visitTotal time spent helping on visit
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose2.02.0
Iron Sucrose2.02.0

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Week 8

"Efficacy~Evaluate the effect on the hemoglobin (Hb) level following treatment with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose vs iron sucrose in subjects with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) .~Response was defined as change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) to week 8, i.e. ability to increase Hb in subjects with IDA, when oral iron preparations were ineffective or could not be used or in whom the screening Hb measurement in Investigators' opinion were sufficiently low to require rapid repletion of iron stores." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

Interventiong/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose2.49
Iron Sucrose2.49

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Participants/Others Who Took Time Off Work to Attend Visits

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
In employment, YESTook time off work to attend, YESAssistance by others to attend visit, YESOthers took time off work to attend, YES
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose52923321164
Iron Sucrose25811311132

[back to top]

Health Care Resource Use Questionnaire

"Pharmacoeconomics~Resources used by the health care staff (per administration), measured by the health care resource use questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed the time used by the health care staff during administration of the investigational product and the administration time (including the observational time). The health care participants included in the evaluation were: investigator, pharmacist, physician, study coordinator, study nurse.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the treatment groups is different (i.e. up to a factor 5 more frequent in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Time spent per site staff medianTime spent per subject median
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose1.083.38
Iron Sucrose1.003.00

[back to top]

Hb Concentration Increase of ≥2 g/dL From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Results show responders to the treatment. A subject was considered a Hb responder to a certain week if an increase in Hb of at least 2 g/dL from baseline to the week in question was observed (week 1, 2, 4, and 8)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responder YES week 1Responder YES week 2Responder YES week 4Responder YES week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose51297514606
Iron Sucrose1294250309

[back to top]

Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Changes in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8.~TSAT is the value of serum iron divided by the total iron-binding capacity and the unit is %, which referrers to % of iron-binding sites of transferrin being occupied by iron." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionpercentage of saturation (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose16.6812.3311.639.01
Iron Sucrose5.8410.5811.088.87

[back to top]

Change in S-ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Change in s-ferritin concentration from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose373.5211.898.049.0
Iron Sucrose105.7169.9109.258.7

[back to top]

Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 4

"Efficacy~Change in Hb concentration from baseline to week 1, 2, and 4." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 4

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose0.701.492.15
Iron Sucrose0.471.252.13

[back to top]

Change in Fatigue Symptoms From Baseline to Week 1, 2, and 8

"Efficacy~Change in fatigue symptoms from baseline to week 1, 2, and 8 was measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale.~The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale consisted of 13 items ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except items #7 and #8 which are reversed scored. The total score range is 0-52.~A score of less than 30 indicated severe fatigue, and the higher the score, the better outcome/quality of life (QoL). If more than 50% of the items for a subject at a given visit were missing, the total score was not calculated.~Total score was calculated as shown below:~Total score= Sum of individual scores x 13 / Number of items answered" (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, and 8

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose7.9810.7414.08
Iron Sucrose7.3811.8915.36

[back to top]

Change in Concentrations of Serum Iron (S-iron) From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Efficacy~Changes in the concentrations of serum iron (s-iron) from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, and 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionμg/dL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 8
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose63.238.831.224.2
Iron Sucrose22.437.035.127.6

[back to top]

Time to First Composite Cardiovascular Safety AE

"Safety~Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit. Only the adjudicated and confirmed composite cardiovascular safety AEs, as judged by the CEAC, were considered for this endpoint.~Time to first composite cardiovascular AE was defined as the actual time in days from first dose of treatment until the date of the composite cardiovascular AE. For subjects not reporting a composite cardiovascular AE, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionWeek (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric DerisomaltoseNA
Iron SucroseNA

[back to top]

S-phosphate <2 mg/dL at Any Time From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

"Safety~Results show the number of subjects who had s-phosphate <2 mg/dL at any time from baseline to week 1, 2, 4, or 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4, and 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose38
Iron Sucrose11

[back to top]

S-Ferritin Concentration of ≥100 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 20-50% at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Proportion of subjects reaching the composite endpoint of s-ferritin concentration ≥100 ng/mL and TSAT of 20-50% at any time from week 1 to 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose680
Iron Sucrose164

[back to top]

Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) Questionnaire, Return Journey by Car

"Pharmacoeconomics~The Intervals in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (ISDR) questionnaire at the baseline visit assessed the resources used by subjects to receive treatment. Resources used on other trial activities were not included. ISDR responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.~The data for this endpoint show the responses at baseline for both treatment groups.~The frequency of drug administration between the 2 treatment groups is different, however, (i.e. up to a factor 5 in the iron sucrose treatment group)." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmiles (Median)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose15.0
Iron Sucrose15.0

[back to top]

Incidence of Protocol-defined Serious or Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions

"Safety~For this endpoint, the number of participants with serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions were evaluated. The hypersensitivity reactions that were included in the analysis were those that started on or after the first dose of randomised treatment (i.e. treatment emergent). The terms used to define hypersensitivity were those specified by the Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQ) for hypersensitivity, plus four additional terms: loss of consciousness, seizure, syncope, unresponsiveness.~The potential hypersensitivity AEs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC).~Results show only those participants that had adjudicated and confirmed serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose3
Iron Sucrose2

[back to top]

Hb Concentration of >12 g/dL at Any Time From Week 1 to Week 8

"Efficacy~Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8.~Results show the number of participants who achieved Hb concentration of >12 g/dL at any time from week 1 to week 8." (NCT02940886)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose484
Iron Sucrose225

[back to top]

Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8

Haemoglobin (Hb) (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)3.014.464.965.09
Iron Sucrose (IS)2.534.084.614.87

[back to top]

Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

(NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)759.72379.31255.71202.09
Iron Sucrose (IS)385.51280.58184.93145.56

[back to top]

Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment

Iron deficiency correction: TSAT >= 16% and serum ferritin >=100ng/mL (for subjects with underlying inflammatory disease) or >14ng/mL (for subjects with no apparent underlying inflammatory disease). (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)173165161162
Iron Sucrose (IS)135168163154

[back to top]

Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

Transferrin saturation (TSAT) (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionPercentage of TSAT (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)30.1628.0025.5025.32
Iron Sucrose (IS)25.0325.3023.3320.82

[back to top]

Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

(NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
Interventionumol/L (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)15.5312.3110.7710.77
Iron Sucrose (IS)16.2312.3911.2710.09

[back to top]

Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL at Any Time up to Week 8

Haemoglobin (Hb) (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From baseline at any time up to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)176
Iron Sucrose (IS)175

[back to top]

Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

(NCT03591406)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)81.476.375.576.075.8
Iron Sucrose (IS)82.276.576.677.277.5

[back to top]

Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

Haemoglobin (Hb) (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)150164169173
Iron Sucrose (IS)129167168171

[back to top]

Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

"Please note that in this section we are presenting just the overview of the adverse events experienced by the trial participant, in particular, the number of participants with at least one TEAE until end of the trial.~Please refer to the detailed tables included on the Adverse Event Module for specifics" (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: From Baseline to the End of the study (week 8)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)124
Iron Sucrose (IS)101

[back to top]

Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

Diastolic Blood pressure (NCT03591406)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)69.871.072.171.672.4
Iron Sucrose (IS)71.972.673.874.374.1

[back to top]

Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

(NCT03591406)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionºC (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)36.9436.4836.4936.4736.48
Iron Sucrose (IS)36.4536.4436.4036.4136.46

[back to top]

Body Weight at Baseline and Week 8

(NCT03591406)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8

,
Interventionkg (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)59.7659.73
Iron Sucrose (IS)60.4060.64

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Incrementation

Incrementation of haemoglobin of 5g/l following treatment (NCT03658876)
Timeframe: Within 2 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EPO Group61
Iron Group53

[back to top]