Page last updated: 2024-10-22

albuterol and Dyspnea

albuterol has been researched along with Dyspnea in 131 studies

Albuterol: A short-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist that is primarily used as a bronchodilator agent to treat ASTHMA. Albuterol is prepared as a racemic mixture of R(-) and S(+) stereoisomers. The stereospecific preparation of R(-) isomer of albuterol is referred to as levalbuterol.
albuterol : A member of the class of phenylethanolamines that is 4-(2-amino-1-hydroxyethyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol having a tert-butyl group attached to the nirogen atom. It acts as a beta-adrenergic agonist used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Dyspnea: Difficult or labored breathing.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To determine and define the beneficial effects of heliox-driven albuterol therapy on severe asthma exacerbation and clinical factors that affect greater response."9.11Beneficial effects of albuterol therapy driven by heliox versus by oxygen in severe asthma exacerbation. ( Chang, HW; Hsu, CW; Huang, YC; Lee, DL; Lee, H, 2005)
"The efficacy of an antitussive-beta 2-sympathomimetic combination (dextromethorphan-salbutamol) was compared with that of a plain antitussive (dextromethorphan) and a placebo in a double-blind trial in 108 out-patients with cough associated with acute respiratory infection."9.06The treatment of acute transient cough: a placebo-controlled comparison of dextromethorphan and dextromethorphan-beta 2-sympathomimetic combination. ( Flygare, U; Karttunen, P; Korhonen, R; Korhonen, T; Majander, R; Seuri, M; Silvasti, M; Tukiainen, H, 1986)
" Study participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 treatments: once-daily tiotropium bromide 5 µg for 7 to 14 days during respiratory tract infections and as-needed albuterol sulfate 0."5.51Intermittent Tiotropium Bromide for Episodic Wheezing: A Randomized Trial. ( Aito, H; Jauhola, O; Klemola, T; Koponen, P; Kotaniemi-Syrjänen, A; Mäkelä, MJ; Malmberg, LP; Malmström, K; Pelkonen, AS; Rahiala, E; Sarna, S, 2022)
"Magnesium sulfate has been shown to be an effective treatment in older children with asthma exacerbations, but it has not been investigated in acute severe virus-induced wheezing in young children."5.27Intravenous magnesium sulfate for acute wheezing in young children: a randomised double-blind trial. ( Dunder, T; Kallio, M; Pokka, T; Pruikkonen, H; Renko, M; Tapiainen, T; Uhari, M, 2018)
"Subjects with acute exacerbation of asthma (FEV1 <50% predicted following 30 min of standardized treatment: 5 mg nebulized albuterol; 0."5.19Repeated dyspnea score and percent FEV1 are modest predictors of hospitalization/relapse in patients with acute asthma exacerbation. ( Ferguson, I; House, SL; Johnson, K; Lewis, LM; Liu, J; Matsuda, K; Schneider, JE, 2014)
" Changes in pulmonary function, dyspnea, and rescue levalbuterol use were evaluated, as were safety outcomes."5.14Effects of arformoterol twice daily, tiotropium once daily, and their combination in patients with COPD. ( Andrews, WT; Donohue, JF; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; Huang, H; Mahler, DA; Schaefer, K; Tashkin, DP, 2009)
"The effects of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate, alone or in combination, on PEF and breathlessness are seen within days and most of the obtainable effect on these parameters is reached within 2 weeks."5.11Early onset of effect of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Anderson, JA; Calverley, P; Jones, P; Pauwels, R; Vestbo, J, 2005)
"Our results indicate that adding theophylline to standard treatment with inhaled bronchodilators provides additional benefits in stable COPD patients by reducing dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation, improving exercise tolerance, dyspnea and QoL."5.11[Clinical and functional benefits of adding theophylline to a standard treatment with short acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD]. ( Borzone, G; Díaz, O; Dreyse, J; Lisboa, C; Silva, F, 2005)
"To determine and define the beneficial effects of heliox-driven albuterol therapy on severe asthma exacerbation and clinical factors that affect greater response."5.11Beneficial effects of albuterol therapy driven by heliox versus by oxygen in severe asthma exacerbation. ( Chang, HW; Hsu, CW; Huang, YC; Lee, DL; Lee, H, 2005)
"This study was performed to determine if levalbuterol improves dyspnea as assessed by prehospital clinical parameters."5.10Effect of levalbuterol on prehospital patient parameters. ( Rodenberg, H, 2002)
" In a crossover study against placebo, albuterol caused a significant increase in expiratory flow and reduced lung hyperinflation and dyspnea at rest, but this was not associated with differences in symptoms with exercise or any relevant parameter of physical performance."5.10Effects of exercise and beta 2-agonists on lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Barisione, G; Beccaria, M; Brusasco, V; Cerveri, I; Corsico, A; Fulgoni, P; Pellegrino, R; Zoia, MC, 2002)
"We tested the hypothesis that the decrease in dyspnea in patients with COPD with inhaled albuterol is in part due to increased diaphragmatic contractility."5.09Does inhaled albuterol improve diaphragmatic contractility in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? ( Hatipoğlu, U; Laghi, F; Tobin, MJ, 1999)
"To evaluate the impact of a week-long course of inhaled albuterol compared with ipratropium on expiratory peak flow, exercise performance, and dyspnea in patients with stable COPD."5.08Is an anticholinergic agent superior to a beta 2-agonist in improving dyspnea and exercise limitation in COPD? ( Blosser, SA; Localio, AR; Maxwell, SL; Reeves-Hoche, MK; Zwillich, CW, 1995)
" The effect of theophylline and salbutamol, alone or combined, on pulmonary function and dyspnea during daily activities was examined."5.07Mechanism of bronchodilator effect in chronic airflow limitation. ( Guyatt, GH; Jaeschke, R; Keller, J; Newhouse, MT; Singer, J, 1991)
" Therefore, we examined the performance of the 6-min walk test, a rating of dyspnea following the walk test, and three different questionnaires measuring dyspnea in daily activities, in a controlled trial of inhaled salbutamol and oral theophylline in 24 patients with primary fixed chronic airflow limitation."5.07Measuring functional status in chronic lung disease: conclusions from a randomized control trial. ( Guyatt, GH; Keller, J; Nogradi, S; Singer, J; Townsend, M, 1991)
"The efficacy of an antitussive-beta 2-sympathomimetic combination (dextromethorphan-salbutamol) was compared with that of a plain antitussive (dextromethorphan) and a placebo in a double-blind trial in 108 out-patients with cough associated with acute respiratory infection."5.06The treatment of acute transient cough: a placebo-controlled comparison of dextromethorphan and dextromethorphan-beta 2-sympathomimetic combination. ( Flygare, U; Karttunen, P; Korhonen, R; Korhonen, T; Majander, R; Seuri, M; Silvasti, M; Tukiainen, H, 1986)
"In a single-blind placebo-controlled trial in 12 patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) we compared the effects of nebulized salbutamol (1 mg), clenbuterol (30 micrograms) and placebo (4 ml of normal saline) on spirometric indices (FVC, FEV1), maximal expiratory flows (Vmax50 and Vmax25), the distance walked in 6 min (6MD), assessment of breathlessness by visual analogue scale (VAS), and estimates by the patients of perceived exertion (RPE)."5.06Effects of beta-agonists on breathlessness and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Galavotti, V; Papiris, S; Sturani, C, 1986)
" There was high agreement in albuterol use for bronchospasm and epinephrine use in anaphylaxis."4.12Variation in Prehospital Protocols for Pediatric Respiratory Distress Management in the United States. ( Martin-Gill, C; McCans, K; Owusu-Ansah, S; Ramgopal, S; Varma, S, 2022)
" Efficacy was measured using serial spirometry, transition dyspnea index (TDI), rescue albuterol use, and St."3.75Nebulized formoterol provides added benefits to tiotropium treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Chaudry, I; Denis-Mize, K; Hanania, NA; McGinty, J; Tashkin, DP, 2009)
" We measured breathlessness at rest, using a Borg scale dyspnea index (BSDI) before and after bronchodilator albuterol [salbutamol] 200 micrograms) in 93 patients with OLD drawn from a larger population undergoing routine spirometry."3.67The relationship between pulmonary function and dyspnea in obstructive lung disease. ( Colacone, A; Dajczman, E; Kreisman, H; Wolkove, N, 1989)
"Twenty-eight stable COPD patients had their ILPs and FEV1 measured both before and 2 h after the use of a single dose of 18 mcg bronchodilator tiotropium and 50 mcg salmeterol."2.79Effects of long-acting bronchodilators and prednisolone on inspiratory lung function parameters in stable COPD. ( Dekhuijzen, PN; Heijdra, YF; Hop, WC; Ramlal, SK; Visser, FJ, 2014)
"We studied 24 patients with moderate COPD (FEV1 59 ± 9% predicted) after inhalation of ipratropium/salbutamol combination or placebo in a double-blind, crossover design."2.79Comparing dynamic hyperinflation and associated dyspnea induced by metronome-paced tachypnea versus incremental exercise. ( Bateman, ED; Bateman, ME; Calligaro, GL; Cooper, CB; Raine, RI, 2014)
"In mild-to-moderate COPD, FSC was associated with significant improvements in airway function at rest and during exercise."2.78Effect of fluticasone/salmeterol combination on dyspnea and respiratory mechanics in mild-to-moderate COPD. ( Guenette, JA; O'Donnell, DE; Webb, KA, 2013)
"Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) are characterized by increased dyspnea due to dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation."2.77Randomized controlled trial of a breath-activated nebulizer in patients with exacerbation of COPD. ( Haynes, JM, 2012)
"Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator recently approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."2.76Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison. ( Centanni, S; Dahl, R; Dogra, A; Kornmann, O; Kramer, B; Lassen, C; Owen, R, 2011)
"Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, ultra-long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator for maintenance use in patients with COPD."2.76Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD. ( Gale, R; Jones, PW; Kramer, B; Mahler, DA; Owen, R, 2011)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease characterized by airflow obstruction and lung hyperinflation leading to dyspnea and exercise capacity limitation."2.76Effects of beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination on lung hyperinflation and dyspnea in COPD patients. ( Aiello, M; Chetta, A; Clini, EM; Crisafulli, E; Nicolini, G; Olivieri, D; Tzani, P, 2011)
"Current guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the use of long-acting bronchodilators in the maintenance management of COPD."2.74Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. ( Boota, A; Denis-Mize, K; Hanania, NA; Kerwin, E; Tomlinson, L, 2009)
"The regression slope of breathlessness as a function of oxygen consumption (primary outcome), mean ratings of breathlessness throughout exercise and peak ratings of breathlessness were significantly higher with naloxone than normal saline."2.74Endogenous opioids modify dyspnoea during treadmill exercise in patients with COPD. ( Baird, JC; Kraemer, WJ; Mahler, DA; Murray, JA; Ward, J; Waterman, LA; Zhang, X, 2009)
"In severe or very severe COPD patients with relatively fixed airway obstruction bronchodilators enhance exercise performance obtained with oxygen."2.73The effect of bronchodilators and oxygen alone and in combination on self-paced exercise performance in stable COPD. ( Calverley, PM; Cortopassi, F; Cukier, A; Ferreira, CA; Ribeiro, M; Stelmach, R, 2007)
"After a 1-week washout, 8 steroid-naïve COPD patients with AATD (ZZ genotype), within a double-blind randomized cross-over study, were assigned to one of the following 16-week treatments: (1) HFA-BDP 400 microg b."2.73Inhaled corticosteroids as additional treatment in alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency-related COPD. ( Bertella, E; Boni, E; Corda, L; La Piana, GE; Redolfi, S; Tantucci, C, 2008)
"The effect of treatment on FEV1 and breathlessness (using the Borg scale) was measured at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after test treatment."2.72Onset of relief of dyspnoea with budesonide/formoterol or salbutamol following methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Aalbers, R; Bantje, TA; Jonkers, RE, 2006)
"Exacerbations of COPD and health resource usage were positively affected by daily treatment with tiotropium."2.71Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD. ( Brusasco, V; Hodder, R; Kesten, S; Korducki, L; Miravitlles, M; Towse, L, 2003)
"It has been shown that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) develop dynamic hyperinflation (DH), which contributes to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance."2.71Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnoea at rest in COPD. ( Boveri, B; Carlucci, P; Casanova, F; Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; Di Marco, F; Milic-Emili, J; Santus, P, 2003)
"A total of 67 stable patients with COPD were recruited at the Kyoto University Hospital."2.71A comparison of the effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on exercise endurance in patients with COPD. ( Hajiro, T; Mishima, M; Nishimura, K; Oga, T; Sato, S; Tsukino, M, 2003)
"Subjects quantified their sensation of breathlessness during the challenge tests on a modified Borg scale at the start of the study and every 4 weeks thereafter."2.70Potential masking effect on dyspnoea perception by short- and long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma. ( Bijl-Hofland, ID; Cloosterman, SG; Folgering, HT; van der Elshout, FJ; van Schayck, CP; Van Weel, C, 2002)
"Dyspnea is a common complaint during daily activities in patients with advanced COPD."2.69The cumulative effect of long-acting bronchodilators, exercise, and inspiratory muscle training on the perception of dyspnea in patients with advanced COPD. ( Berar-Yanay, N; Davidovich, A; Magadle, R; Weiner, M; Weiner, P, 2000)
"Comparisons of breathlessness, exercise volumes, and pressures were made at the highest equivalent work load."2.68Inhaled bronchodilators reduce dynamic hyperinflation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Belman, MJ; Botnick, WC; Shin, JW, 1996)
"Dyspnea was measured by the -5 to +5 category scale at rest and by the 0 to 10 category-ratio scale while breathing through inspiratory resistances of 5, 15, and 30 cm H20/L/s."2.68Salmeterol reduces dyspnea and improves lung function in patients with COPD. ( Lentine, T; Mahler, DA; Ramirez-Venegas, A; Ward, J, 1997)
"Indacaterol is a once-daily, long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator that improves dyspnoea and health status in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD."2.49Effects of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD patients according to COPD severity and ICS use. ( Dahl, R; Decramer, M; Korn, S; Kornmann, O; Lawrence, D; McBryan, D, 2013)
"Indacaterol studies have shown significant improvements in lung function of COPD patients, and these improvements have also translated into clinically meaningful improvements in patient symptoms and HR-QOL."2.49Improving the quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: focus on indacaterol. ( Feldman, GJ, 2013)
"Treatment with tiotropium bromide has generally improved patients' health-related quality of life, reduced the number of patients suffering from acute exacerbations, decreased the number of hospitalizations, improved dyspnea, and reduced adverse events compared to placebo."2.49Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives. ( Connolly, MJ; Hanania, NA; Yohannes, AM, 2013)
"In terms of breathlessness (transitional dyspnea index) at 12 weeks, the results are inconclusive given the limited data."2.48Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis. ( Capkun-Niggli, G; Cope, S; Jansen, JP; Kraemer, M; Zhang, J, 2012)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered one of the most common chronic diseases in the world."2.43[The beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. ( Chorostowska-Wynimko, J, 2005)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease with a global impact in terms of morbidity and mortality."2.43Improving dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal treatment strategies. ( Rabe, KF, 2006)
"Subjects hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation participated in a comparative clinical effectiveness study of 2 methods of nebulization."1.91Response to Bronchodilators Administered via Different Nebulizers in Patients With COPD Exacerbation. ( Alsaid, A; Costello, RW; Cushen, B; Greene, G, 2023)
"Dyspnea has been reported to be a main contributor to exercise avoidance in asthma."1.48Exertional dyspnea and operating lung volumes in asthma. ( Bhutani, M; Brotto, AR; Moore, LE; Phillips, DB; Stickland, MK, 2018)
"Life-threatening anaphylactic shock is a rare (1 in 1 million) but documented occurrence in response to subcutaneous immunotherapy."1.48Neurologic manifestations in anaphylaxis due to subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy: A case report. ( Mangold, M; Qureshi, M, 2018)
"Physically inactive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit higher rates of exacerbations and symptoms of dyspnoea than active patients."1.42Physical activity in COPD patients decreases short-acting bronchodilator use and the number of exacerbations. ( Katajisto, M; Kilpeläinen, M; Koskela, J; Laitinen, T; Lindqvist, A, 2015)
"COPD is commonly diagnosed and treated in patients without airflow obstruction."1.37Disease severity and symptoms among patients receiving monotherapy for COPD. ( Bailey, W; Crater, G; Dransfield, MT; Emmett, A; O'Dell, DM; Yawn, B, 2011)
"Patients with COPD are frequently prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); however, it is unclear whether the treatment with ICS might modify responses to inhaled bronchodilators."1.34Outcomes in COPD patients receiving tiotropium or salmeterol plus treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. ( Hodder, R; Kesten, S; Menjoge, S; Viel, K, 2007)
" According to the dose-response curve to methacholine, they were categorized as having either unlimited airway narrowing (UAN group) (n = 20) or response plateau (RP group) (n = 18)."1.33Dyspnea perception and reversibility of methacholine-induced unlimited airway narrowing in asthmatics. ( Malakauskas, K; Sakalauskas, R; Sitkauskiene, B; Stravinskaite, K, 2006)
"The EFL in bronchial asthma patients is reversible after bronchodilator administration."1.33[Expiratory flow limitation detected by negative expiratory pressure in patients with bronchial asthma]. ( Chen, AH; Chen, RC; Li, JM; Liu, Q; Zhang, NF; Zhong, NS, 2006)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by the lack or only slight reversibility of obstruction which can be assessed by spirometry after inhalation of short-acting beta 2-mimetic (e."1.32[Influence of orthopnoea position on spirometric and plethysmographic parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ]. ( Krzyzowski, G; Pierzchała, W; Szulakowski, P; Trzaska, M, 2003)
"Patients with COPD with EFL may experience less breathlessness after a bronchodilator, at least during light exercise, than those without EFL."1.31Volume effect and exertional dyspnoea after bronchodilator in patients with COPD with and without expiratory flow limitation at rest. ( Boni, E; Chiroli, P; Corda, L; Damiani, GP; Franchini, D; Grassi, V; Pini, L; Tantucci, C, 2002)
" These aerosolized medications are not without the potential for adverse effects."1.29Unexpected adverse effects of Freon 11 and Freon 12 as medication propellants. ( Oenbrink, RJ, 1993)
" Bronchial lability was characterized by (1) variability in mean daily peak expiratory flow rate and (2) bronchial responsiveness to either carbachol (as assessed by the threshold dose and the slope of the dose-response curve) or salbutamol (as assessed by the threshold dose and maximal response)."1.28Relationship between spontaneous dyspnoea and lability of airway obstruction in asthma. ( Lockhart, A; Marsac, J; Peiffer, C; Razzouk, H; Toumi, M, 1992)

Research

Studies (131)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199010 (7.63)18.7374
1990's18 (13.74)18.2507
2000's62 (47.33)29.6817
2010's36 (27.48)24.3611
2020's5 (3.82)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
McCans, K1
Varma, S1
Ramgopal, S1
Martin-Gill, C1
Owusu-Ansah, S1
Kotaniemi-Syrjänen, A1
Klemola, T1
Koponen, P1
Jauhola, O1
Aito, H1
Malmström, K1
Malmberg, LP1
Rahiala, E1
Sarna, S1
Pelkonen, AS1
Mäkelä, MJ1
Cushen, B1
Alsaid, A1
Greene, G1
Costello, RW1
Codispoti, CD1
Bandi, S1
Patel, P1
Mahdavinia, M1
Hodroge, SS1
Glenn, M1
Breyre, A1
Lee, B1
Aldridge, NR1
Sporer, KA1
Koenig, KL1
Gausche-Hill, M1
Salvucci, AA1
Rudnick, EM1
Brown, JF1
Gilbert, GH1
Sauer, R1
Griff, S1
Blau, A1
Franke, A1
Mairinger, T1
Grah, C1
Banzett, RB1
Schwartzstein, RM2
Lansing, RW1
O'Donnell, CR1
O'Donnell, DE3
Elbehairy, AF1
Faisal, A1
Neder, JA1
Webb, KA3
Pruikkonen, H1
Tapiainen, T1
Kallio, M1
Dunder, T1
Pokka, T1
Uhari, M1
Renko, M1
Mangold, M1
Qureshi, M1
Moore, LE1
Brotto, AR1
Phillips, DB1
Bhutani, M1
Stickland, MK1
Guenette, JA1
Feldman, GJ1
Yohannes, AM1
Connolly, MJ1
Hanania, NA4
Nuijsink, M1
Hop, WC2
Jongste, JC1
Sterk, PJ1
Duiverman, AE1
Bel, EH1
Baldi, BG1
de Albuquerque, AL1
Pimenta, SP1
Salge, JM1
Kairalla, RA1
Carvalho, CR1
Ramlal, SK1
Visser, FJ1
Dekhuijzen, PN1
Heijdra, YF1
Calligaro, GL1
Raine, RI1
Bateman, ME1
Bateman, ED1
Cooper, CB1
Kaplan, A1
Gruffydd-Jones, K1
van Gemert, F1
Kirenga, BJ1
Medford, AR1
Schrimpf, M1
Steudter, E1
Schneider, JE1
Lewis, LM1
Ferguson, I1
House, SL1
Liu, J1
Matsuda, K1
Johnson, K1
Bhatt, SP1
Wells, JM1
Kim, V1
Criner, GJ1
Hersh, CP1
Hardin, M1
Bailey, WC1
Nath, H1
Kim, YI1
Foreman, MG1
Stinson, DS1
Wilson, CG1
Rennard, SI1
Silverman, EK1
Make, BJ1
Dransfield, MT2
Katajisto, M1
Koskela, J1
Lindqvist, A1
Kilpeläinen, M1
Laitinen, T1
Füeßl, HS1
Perez, T2
Chanez, P1
Dusser, D1
Devillier, P1
Burgel, PR1
Le Gros, V1
Decuypère, L1
Bourdeix, I1
Deslée, G1
Richie, RC1
Singh, AK1
Gaur, S1
Kumar, R1
Ramnarayan, P1
Chhabra, R1
Maheshwari, P1
Tashkin, DP3
Donohue, JF3
Mahler, DA8
Huang, H1
Goodwin, E1
Schaefer, K1
Hanrahan, JP2
Andrews, WT1
Murray, JA1
Waterman, LA1
Ward, J4
Kraemer, WJ1
Zhang, X1
Baird, JC2
Boota, A1
Kerwin, E1
Tomlinson, L1
Denis-Mize, K2
Mukhopadhyay, A1
Dela Pena, E1
Wadden, B1
Procyshyn, M1
Keang Lim, T1
Hayes, D1
Kriss, VM1
Iocono, JA1
Dixon, BJ1
Collins, PB1
Ballard, HO1
Pasqua, F1
Biscione, G1
Crigna, G1
Auciello, L1
Cazzola, M4
McGinty, J1
Chaudry, I1
Cevik, Y1
Onay, M1
Akmaz, I1
Sezigen, S1
van Noord, JA1
Aumann, JL1
Janssens, E1
Smeets, JJ1
Zaagsma, J1
Mueller, A1
Cornelissen, PJ1
Kornmann, O2
Dahl, R2
Centanni, S2
Dogra, A1
Owen, R2
Lassen, C1
Kramer, B2
Bailey, W1
Crater, G1
Emmett, A2
O'Dell, DM1
Yawn, B1
Ozier, A1
Girodet, PO1
Bara, I1
Tunon de Lara, JM1
Marthan, R1
Berger, P1
Jones, PW2
Gale, R1
Diba, C1
King, GG1
Berend, N1
Salome, CM1
Tzani, P1
Crisafulli, E1
Nicolini, G1
Aiello, M1
Chetta, A1
Clini, EM1
Olivieri, D1
Haynes, JM1
Marrero, E1
Cope, S1
Kraemer, M1
Zhang, J1
Capkun-Niggli, G1
Jansen, JP1
Haran, M1
Schattner, A1
Mate, A1
Starobin, D1
Haran, G1
Shtalrid, M1
Decramer, M2
Korn, S1
Lawrence, D1
McBryan, D1
Rodenberg, H1
Sanjuás, C1
Corsico, A1
Fulgoni, P1
Beccaria, M1
Zoia, MC1
Barisione, G1
Pellegrino, R1
Brusasco, V2
Cerveri, I1
Fraser, J1
Kamps, AW1
Brand, PL1
Di Marco, F1
Milic-Emili, J1
Boveri, B1
Carlucci, P1
Santus, P1
Casanova, F1
Witek, TJ2
Pershad, J1
Chin, T1
Hodder, R2
Miravitlles, M1
Korducki, L1
Towse, L1
Kesten, S2
Oga, T1
Nishimura, K1
Tsukino, M1
Sato, S1
Hajiro, T1
Mishima, M1
Weiner, P2
Magadle, R2
Beckerman, M1
Berar-Yanay, N2
Aguilaniu, B1
Krzyzowski, G1
Szulakowski, P1
Trzaska, M1
Pierzchała, W1
Witte, KK1
Morice, A1
Cleland, JG1
Clark, AL1
Calverley, PM2
Kalberg, C1
Merchant, K1
Knobil, K2
van der Woude, HJ2
Postma, DS1
Politiek, MJ1
Winter, TH1
Aalbers, R3
Vestbo, J1
Pauwels, R1
Anderson, JA1
Jones, P1
Calverley, P1
Fierro-Carrion, G1
Mejia-Alfaro, R1
Lee, DL1
Hsu, CW1
Lee, H1
Chang, HW1
Huang, YC1
Dreyse, J1
Silva, F1
Díaz, O1
Borzone, G1
Lisboa, C1
Stockley, RA1
Chopra, N1
Rice, L1
Chorostowska-Wynimko, J1
Lampert, S1
Schmid, A1
Wiest, G1
Hahn, EG1
Ficker, JH1
Rabe, KF1
Brown, RA1
Allegra, L1
Matera, MG1
Page, CP2
Malakauskas, K1
Sitkauskiene, B1
Stravinskaite, K1
Sakalauskas, R1
Sciurba, F1
Celli, B1
Kalberg, CJ1
Cukier, A1
Ferreira, CA1
Stelmach, R1
Ribeiro, M1
Cortopassi, F1
Ohm, R1
Aaronson, LS1
Gabriella Matera, M1
Jonkers, RE1
Bantje, TA1
Lehmann, S1
Bakke, PS1
Eide, GE1
Gulsvik, A1
Zhang, NF1
Chen, AH1
Chen, RC1
Li, JM1
Liu, Q1
Zhong, NS1
Baumgartner, RA1
Calhoun, WJ1
Sahn, SA1
Sciarappa, K1
Menjoge, S1
Viel, K1
Brouillard, C1
Pepin, V1
Milot, J1
Lacasse, Y1
Maltais, F1
Corda, L2
Bertella, E1
La Piana, GE1
Boni, E2
Redolfi, S1
Tantucci, C2
Stark, RD1
Gambles, SA1
Manzini, S1
Perretti, F1
Abelli, L1
Evangelista, S1
Seeds, EA1
Subratty, AH1
Zehner, WJ1
Scott, JM1
Iannolo, PM1
Ungaro, A1
Terndrup, TE1
Blosser, SA1
Maxwell, SL1
Reeves-Hoche, MK1
Localio, AR1
Zwillich, CW1
Laliberté, M1
Sanfaçon, G1
Blais, R1
Oenbrink, RJ1
Belman, MJ1
Botnick, WC1
Shin, JW1
Teramoto, S1
Fukuchi, Y1
Ouchi, Y1
Maury, E1
Ioos, V1
Lepecq, B1
Guidet, B1
Offenstadt, G1
Ramirez-Venegas, A1
Lentine, T2
Słomka, A1
Moy, ML1
Lantin, ML1
Harver, A1
Hatipoğlu, U1
Laghi, F1
Tobin, MJ1
Samet, A1
Bayoumeu, F1
Longrois, D1
Laxenaire, MC1
Jang, AS1
Choi, IS1
Park, CS1
Karras, DJ1
Sammon, ME1
Terregino, CA1
Lopez, BL1
Griswold, SK1
Arnold, GK1
Heyse-Moore, L1
Beynon, T1
Ross, V1
Taube, C2
Lehnigk, B1
Paasch, K1
Kirsten, DK1
Jörres, RA2
Magnussen, H2
Davidovich, A1
Weiner, M1
Casaburi, R1
Briggs, DD1
Serby, CW1
Menjoge, SS1
Ayers, ML1
Mejia, R1
Holz, O1
Mücke, M1
van Schayck, CP1
Bijl-Hofland, ID1
Cloosterman, SG1
Folgering, HT1
van der Elshout, FJ1
Van Weel, C1
Willaert, W1
Daenen, M1
Bomans, P1
Verleden, G1
Franchini, D1
Chiroli, P1
Damiani, GP1
Pini, L1
Grassi, V1
Vialatte, J1
Mannino, F1
Mancini, G1
König, P1
Cesco, G1
Peiffer, C1
Toumi, M1
Razzouk, H1
Marsac, J1
Lockhart, A1
Guyatt, GH3
Townsend, M2
Keller, J2
Singer, J2
Nogradi, S2
Jaeschke, R1
Newhouse, MT2
Taurand, P1
Wolkove, N1
Dajczman, E1
Colacone, A1
Kreisman, H1
Pugsley, SO1
Keller, JL1
Papiris, S1
Galavotti, V1
Sturani, C1
Tukiainen, H1
Karttunen, P1
Silvasti, M1
Flygare, U1
Korhonen, R1
Korhonen, T1
Majander, R1
Seuri, M1
Kerr, JW1

Clinical Trials (23)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Efficacy of Intermittent Tiotropium in Early Childhood Wheezing[NCT03199976]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-20Completed
The Efficacy of Intravenous Magnesium in Acute Wheezy Bronchitis in Small Children - a Randomized, Controlled Study[NCT01383655]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
MN-221-CL-007: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MN-221 When Administered Intravenously as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy to Adults With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma[NCT00838591]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Evaluation of the Prevalence and the Reversibility of the Lung Hyperinflation in Uncontrolled Persistent Asthmatic Patients With Dyspnea[NCT01573364]450 participants (Actual)Observational2011-02-28Completed
Study of the Predictive Value of Airway Obstruction Reversibility on the Effectiveness of Indacaterol (Onbrez® Breezhaler ®) 150 mcg Once Daily in Patients With Moderate to Severe COPD[NCT01272362]Phase 4625 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Two-Week, Randomized, Modified-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Study of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution Twice-Daily, Tiotropium Once-Daily, and Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution Twice-Daily and Tiotropium Once D[NCT00424528]Phase 4235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Role of Endorphins in the Perception of Dyspnea in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[NCT00458419]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A 6-Week Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Treatment With Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Solution 20 Mcg Twice Daily and Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily to Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Obs[NCT00507234]Phase 3128 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Remotely Supervised Exercise Program for Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiation[NCT03500393]4 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-22Terminated (stopped due to feasibility of study recruitment)
An Evaluation of Lung Function and Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Long-Acting Bronchodilator Monotherapy[NCT00791518]1,084 participants (Actual)Observational2008-12-31Completed
A 26-week Treatment, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo-controlled, Adaptive, Seamless, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Doses of Indacaterol (Selected From 75, 150, 300 & 600 µg o.d.) i[NCT00463567]Phase 2/Phase 32,059 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A 26-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double- Dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, and Safety of Indacaterol (150 µg o.d.) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Using Salmeterol ([NCT00567996]Phase 31,002 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A 52-week Treatment, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Indacaterol (300 and 600 µg Once Daily) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary D[NCT00393458]Phase 31,732 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Two Way Cross-Over Study to Evaluate Changes in Oxygen Consumption and Cardiac Function in COPD Patients With Resting Hyperinflation After Administration of Symbicort pMDI 160/4.5 μg.[NCT02533505]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-25Completed
A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subject[NCT03084796]Phase 2733 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-28Completed
The Effect of Neck Stabilization Exercise Plus Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Pulmonary Function of SCI[NCT04500223]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-01Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Center Trial of the Use of Heliox in Children Admitted to the Hospital With Status Asthmaticus[NCT00410150]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated (stopped due to Study was stopped after interim analysis and slow enrollment.)
The Cardiopulmonary Effect of Inhaled Beta-2-agonists on Adult Ventrucular Septal Defect Patients With Persistant or Surgically Corrected Conditions - The VENTI Trial[NCT02914652]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-15Completed
Adiposity and Airway Inflammation in HIV-Associated Airway Disease[NCT02975258]102 participants (Actual)Observational2015-09-30Completed
Effects of Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure on Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[NCT02566915]19 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Enrolling by invitation
The Various Effects of Gaseous Albuterol on Serum Lactate[NCT02073747]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Change of Inspiratory Peak Flow After Bronchial Dilatation on Patients With Moderate to Severe COPD[NCT00561886]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
The RETORNUS Study: Dual Training to Restore the Function of Respiratory Muscles in Stroke Patients[NCT02125760]129 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in FEV1 From Study Baseline to the 24-hour Timepoint (Trough)

Trough FEV1 is defined as the measurement collected approximately 24 hours after the first in-clinic double-blind dose at Week 0. Change is calculated as Week 2 24 hour post first dose FEV1 - Week 0 pre-first dose FEV1. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: Following 2 weeks of dosing

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.086
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.080
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.154

Change in Inspiratory Capacity From Study Baseline to the 24 Hour Timepoint (Trough) Following 2 Weeks of Dosing

Trough Inspiratory Capacity is defined as the measurement collected approximately 24 hours after the first in clinic double-blind treatment dose at week 0. Change is calculated as Week 2 24 hr post dose IC - Week 0 pre first dose IC. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.074
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.023
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.150

Number of Participants With a >= 1 Unit of Improvement in the TDI Focal Score

A Greater than or Equal to 1 unit of Improvement in the TDI Focal Score is considered to be clinically important. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily50
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily44
Arformoterol /Tiotropium60

Percentage of Participants With a >=1 Unit Improvement in Transition Dysnea Index (TDI) Focal Score

A Greater than or Equal to 1 unit of Improvement in the TDI Focal Score is considered to be clinically important. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily66.67
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily57.14
Arformoterol /Tiotropium77.92

Time Normalized Area Under the Change From Study Baseline Curve for FEV1 Over 12-24 Hours (nAUC12-24B)

(NCT00424528)
Timeframe: Following 2 weeks of dosing

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.094
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.054
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.217

Time to Onset in Participants Who Achieved a 10% Increase in FEV1 From Visit Predose After 2 Weeks

Analyzed from end of dosing to 12 hours. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionHours (Median)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.39
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.72
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.17

Time to Onset in Participants Who Achieved a 15% Increase in FEV1 From Visit Predose After 2 Weeks

Analyzed from end of dosing to 12 hours. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionHours (Median)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.76
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily1.29
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.39

Time-normalized Area From Study Baseline Curve for FEV1 Over 0-12 Hours (nAUC0-12B)

(NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 0-12 hours following two weeks of dosing

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.118
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.130
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.242

Time-normalized Area Under the Change From Study Baseline Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Over 24 Hours (nAUC0-24B)

(NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 24 hours following two weeks of dosing.

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.104
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.080
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.221

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score

TDI Focal score (range -9 to 9) is defined as the sum of function impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort (each on a -3 to 3 scale). A score of -9 is maximum worsening and 9 is maximum improvement. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily2.28
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily1.79
Arformoterol /Tiotropium3.13

Change in FEV1 From Study Baseline at Each Assessed Timepoint Post First Dose of Study Medication

Baseline is FEV1 measurement collected prior to the first double-blind dose at week 0. Change defined as Week 0 FEV1 - Week 2 pre first dose FEV1. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Week 0: immediately post first dose; N=76, 78, 78Week 0: 30 minutes post first dose; N=75, 78, 76Week 0: 1 hour post first dose; N=75, 78, 77Week 0: 2 hours post first dose; N=76, 78, 77Week 0: 4 hours post first dose; N=75, 77, 77Week 0: 6 hours post first dose; N=72, 74, 77Week 0: 8 hours post first dose; N=70, 73, 77Week 0: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 76Week 0: 12 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 75Week 2: immediately post first dose; N=71, 75, 74Week 2: 30 minutes post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 1 hour post first dose; N=71, 75, 73Week 2: 2 hours post first dose; N=71, 73, 74Week 2: 4 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 74Week 2: 6 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 73Week 2: 8 hours post first dose; N=69, 70, 74Week 2: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 71Week 2: 12 hours post first dose; N=63, 67, 71Week 2: immediately post second dose; N=65, 67, 72Week 2: 12.5 hours post first dose; N=65, 66, 72Week 2: 13 hours post first dose; N=63, 68, 72Week 2: 14 hours post first dose; N=65, 71, 72Week 2: 16 hours post first dose; N=63, 70, 71Week 2: 23 hours post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 24 hours post first dose; N=69, 73, 74
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.1390.1830.1890.2390.2230.2140.1940.1900.1990.2400.2800.3080.3300.2790.2660.2200.2050.1890.2350.2700.2720.2920.2400.1450.154
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.1320.1630.1820.1930.1550.1280.1020.1010.0440.1540.1880.1850.2130.1540.1230.0670.0540.0350.1150.1430.1590.1820.1140.0400.086
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily-0.200.0560.1060.1400.1200.1250.1090.1110.0940.0660.1260.1630.1950.1640.1430.1380.1090.1010.0400.0630.0610.0680.048-0.0060.080

Change in FEV1 Percent of Predicted From Study Baseline at Each Assessed Timepoint Post First Dose of Study Medication

Baseline is FEV1 collected prior to first double-blind dose at week 0. Change is defined as Week 0 FEV1 percent predicted - Week 2 pre first dose FEV1 percent predicted. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionPercent of predicted FEV1 (Mean)
Week 0: Immediately post first dose; N=76, 78, 78Week 0: 30 minutes post first dose; N=75, 78, 76Week 0: 1 hour post first dose; N-75, 78, 77Week 0: 2 hours post first dose; N=76, 78, 77Week 0: 4 hours post first dose; N=75, 77, 77Week 0: 6 hours post first dose; N=72, 74, 77Week 0: 8 hours post first dose; N=70, 73, 77Week 0: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 76Week 0: 12 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 75Week 2: Immediately post first dose; N=71, 75, 74Week 2: 30 minutes post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 1 hour post first dose; N=71, 75, 73Week 2: 2 hours post first dose; N=71, 73, 74Week 2: 4 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 74Week 2: 6 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 73Week 2: 8 hours post first dose; N=69, 70, 74Week 2: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 71Week 2: 12 hours post first dose; N=63, 67, 71Week 2: Immediately post second dose; N=65, 67, 72Week 2: 12.5 hours post first dose; N=65, 66, 72Week 2: 13 hours post first dose; N=63, 68, 72Week 2: 14 hours post first dose; N=65, 71, 72Week 2: 16 hours post first dose; N=63, 70, 71Week 2: 23 hours post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 24 hours post first dose; N=69, 73, 74
Arformoterol /Tiotropium4.76.16.38.17.57.36.66.56.78.09.310.211.09.28.87.46.86.37.89.09.19.88.04.85.2
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily4.35.56.16.65.34.43.53.31.65.16.26.27.15.14.02.01.81.33.84.95.46.03.91.32.8
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily-0.62.03.54.74.04.13.53.72.91.94.05.26.35.14.74.43.53.41.12.01.82.01.4-0.22.6

Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) From Study Baseline at Each Assessed Post Dose Timepoint

(NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Week 0: Immediately post first dose; N=76, 78, 78Week 0: 30 minutes post first dose; N=75, 78, 76Week 0: 1 hour post first dose; N=75, 78, 77Week 0: 2 hours post first dose; N=76, 78, 77Week 0: 4 hours post first dose; N=75, 77, 77Week 0: 6 hours post first dose; N=72, 74, 77Week 0: 8 hours post first dose; N=70, 73, 77Week 0: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 76Week 0: 12 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 75Week 2: Immediately post first dose; N=71, 75, 74Week 2: 30 minutes post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 1 hour post first dose; N=71, 75, 73Week 2: 2 hours post first dose; N=71, 73, 74Week 2: 4 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 74Week 2: 6 hours post first dose; N=69, 72, 73Week 2: 8 hours post first dose; N=69, 70, 74Week 2: 10 hours post first dose; N=69, 71, 71Week 2: 12 hours post first dose; N=63, 67, 71Week 2: Immediately post second dose; N=65, 67, 72Week 2: 12.5 hours post first dose; N=65, 66, 72Week 2: 13 hours post first dose; N=63, 68, 72Week 2: 14 hours post first dose; N=65, 71, 72Week 2: 16 hours post first dose; N=63, 70, 71Week 2: 23 hours post first dose; N=70, 74, 74Week 2: 24 hours post first dose; N=69, 73, 74
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.2590.3230.3510.4290.3920.3710.3380.3460.3440.3890.4610.4870.5260.4610.4130.3490.3230.3010.3600.3990.4240.4590.3740.2260.250
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.2760.3120.3440.3760.2910.2420.2070.2090.1310.2930.3430.3500.3800.2650.2020.1360.0980.0870.2100.2620.3070.3430.2150.0820.138
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily-0.0310.1220.1970.2480.2060.1950.1590.1750.1460.0550.2030.2240.2900.2210.2090.2140.1580.1240.0340.0870.0820.1100.098-0.0110.115

Levalbuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) (Rescue Medication) Use in Days Per Week

Overall: Average of the levalbuterol usage in days per week over the 2 week period. Mean number of days/week=number of days levalbuterol used during time period, divided by number of days in the period, multiplied by 7. An actuation is one puff of levalbuterol. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionDays per week (Mean)
Baseline: Number of days used per weekOverall: Number of days used per week
Arformoterol /Tiotropium4.571.38
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily4.442.16
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily4.271.94

Levalbuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Rescue Medication Use in Actuations Per Day

Overall: Average of the usage in number of actuations per day over the 2 week period. An actuation is one puff of levalbuterol. Mean number of actuations/day=number actuations used during time period, divided by number of days in time period. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionActuations per day (Mean)
Baseline: Number of actuations per dayOverall: Number of actuations per day
Arformoterol /Tiotropium3.080.68
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily3.241.18
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily2.771.00

Peak Change in FEV1 Over 12 Hours Post Dose From Study Baseline

12 hour peak change in FEV1 is defined as maximum of the post dose changes through the nominal 12 hour assessment. (NCT00424528)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Week 0; N=76, 79, 78Week 2; N=71, 75, 74
Arformoterol /Tiotropium0.3110.379
Arformoterol 15 Mcg Twice Daily0.2640.273
Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily0.2180.265

Mean mMRC Dyspnea Scale Scores for Participants With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The 5-point mMRC Dyspnea Scale measures the level of dyspnea (trouble breathing) experienced by participants. Scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%1.9
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%1.6

Mean Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale Scores for Participants With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The 5-point mMRC Dyspnea Scale measures the level of dyspnea (trouble breathing) experienced by participants. Scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%1.7
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%1.6

Mean Number of Puffs From All Short-acting Bronchodilators Used in the Past Two Weeks in Participants With an FEV1 of <50% and >=50%

The average number of puffs from all short-acting bronchodilators used in the past 2 weeks was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpuffs (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%5.2
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%2.8

Mean Puffs From All Short-acting Bronchodilators Used in the Past Two Weeks in Participants With an FEV1 of <80% and >=80%

The average number of puffs from all short-acting bronchodilators used in the past 2 weeks was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpuffs (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%3.8
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%2.3

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The number of participants who had a COPD exacerbation (defined as worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring hospitalization was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%16
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%32

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The number of participants who had a COPD exacerbation (defined as worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring hospitalization was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%41
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%7

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Oral Corticosteroids and/or Antibiotics With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The number of participants with a COPD exacerbation (worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%79
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%284

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Oral Corticosteroids and/or Antibiotics With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The number of participants with a COPD exacerbation (worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%246
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%117

Number of Participants With Reports of Diagnosis and/or Treatment for Specific Cardiovascular (Heart), Psychiatric (Anxiety or Depression), and/or Bone Disorders in the <80%, >=80%, <50%, and >=50% FEV1 Groups

The number of participants with the indicated affected medical conditions were counted. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypertensionCoronary artery diseaseEdemaAtherosclerosisArrhythmiaHeart failureStable anginaPeripheral vascular diseaseValvular heart diseasePulmonary edemaIschemic heart disease without cardiomyopathyCardiomyopathyIschemic heart disease with cardiomyopathyCardiomegalyLeft ventricular dysfunctionDiastolic dysfunctionCerebrovascular diseaseLeft ventricular hypertrophyStrokeCardiac arrestMyocardial infarctionTransient ischemic attackUnstable anginaGeneralized anxiety disorderMajor depressive disorder, recurrent episodeSocial anxiety disorder (social phobia)Panic disorderMajor depressive disorder, single episodePost-traumatic stress disorderAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorderOsteoporosisOsteopenia
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%12326232016101366654531122001003730774442911
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%3898769504026252218111081185554121021131072424171499232
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%4008555414023192519977667633431221141223429191898931
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%1342491116779742301320131120384517126842610

Number of Participants With the Categorized Post-albuterol Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) Ratios

The ratio is calculated as the amount of air expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration (FEV1) divided by the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after a full inspiration (FVC). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
<=0.70>0.70
Participants With Diagnosed COPD689383

Percentage of Participants Whose Post-albuterol FEV1 Was <50% Predicted Normal

The percentage of participants on long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) monotherapy who met spirometric criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and who had a post-albuterol FEV1 (the amount of air expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration) <50% predicted normal was calculated. Predicted normal values for FEV1 were calculated using the reference values from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Values are based on the participants' age, height, sex, and race; thus, normal values vary based on participants' demographics. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study; 15-30 min post-albuterol (self-administered)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<50% predicted normal>=50% predicted normal
Participants With Diagnosed COPD2377

Percentage of Participants Whose Post-albuterol Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Was <80% Predicted Normal

The percentage of participants on long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) monotherapy who had a post-albuterol FEV1) <80% predicted normal was calculated. FEV1 is the amount of air that can be expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration. Predicted normal values for FEV1 were calculated using the reference values from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Values are based on the participants' age, height, sex, and race; thus, normal values vary based on participants' demographics. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study; 15-30 min post-albuterol (self-administered)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<80% predicted normal>=80% predicted normal
Participants With Diagnosed COPD7030

"The Percentage of Days of Poor Control Reported Over the 26 Week Treatment Period"

"A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) day of poor control was defined as any day in the participant's diary with a score ≥2 (moderate or severe) for at least 2 of 5 symptoms (cough, wheeze, production of sputum, color of sputum, breathlessness). Score for each symptom ranges from 0-3; a higher number indicates a more severe symptom. The model contained baseline percentage of days of poor control as well as FEV1 reversibility components as covariates." (NCT00463567)
Timeframe: up to 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 µg (Continued Into Stage 2)31.5
Indacaterol 300 µg (Continued Into Stage 2)30.8
Tiotropium (Continued Into Stage 2)31.0
Placebo (Continued Into Stage 2)34.0

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Standardized (With Respect to Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 1 Hour to 4 Hour Post Morning Dose After 2 Weeks of Treatment

"Interim Analysis: Stage 1.~Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Standardized with respect to time (AUC 1h-4h) for FEV1 measurements taken from 1 hour to 4 hour post morning dose on Day 14. Standardized FEV1 AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule. Mixed model used baseline FEV1, FEV1 prior to and 30 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and 1 hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates." (NCT00463567)
Timeframe: Day 14, After 2 Weeks of treatment in Stage 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 µg1.53
Indacaterol 300 µg1.58
Tiotropium 18 µg1.49
Placebo1.30
Indacaterol 75 µg1.50
Indacaterol 600 µg1.53
Formoterol 12 µg1.52

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Assessed by Spirometry 24 Hour Post Dose After 12 Weeks of Treatment

FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the 23 h 10 min and the 23 h 45 min post dose values. Mixed model used baseline FEV1, FEV1 prior to and 30 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and 1 hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates. (NCT00463567)
Timeframe: after 12 weeks of treatment

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 µg (Continued Into Stage 2)1.46
Indacaterol 300 µg (Continued Into Stage 2)1.46
Tiotropium 18 µg (Continued Into Stage 2)1.42
Placebo (Continued Into Stage 2)1.28

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Assessed by Spirometry 24 Hour Post Dose After 2 Weeks of Treatment

"Interim Analysis: Stage 1.~Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the 23 h 10 min and the 23 h 45 min post dose values. Mixed model used baseline FEV1, FEV1 prior to and 30 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and 1 hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates." (NCT00463567)
Timeframe: Day 15, After 2 Weeks of treatment in Stage 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 µg1.49
Indacaterol 300 µg1.52
Tiotropium 18 µg1.45
Placebo1.31
Indacaterol 75 µg1.46
Indacaterol 600 µg1.51
Formoterol 12 µg1.42

"Percentage of COPD Days of Poor Control During 26 Weeks of Treatment"

"Participants rated their symptoms on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe. A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) day of poor control was defined as any day in the participants diary with a score >=2 (moderate or severe) for at least 2 of 5 symptoms (cough, wheeze, production of sputum, color of sputum, breathlessness). The mixed model used baseline percentage of days of poor control, FEV1 prior to and 30 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and one hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates." (NCT00567996)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 μg34.1
Salmeterol 50 μg34.1
Placebo38.1

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

SGRQ is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 76 items in three sections: symptoms, activity and impacts. The total score is 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating poorer health status. The mixed model used baseline SGRQ total score, FEV1 prior to and 30 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and one hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates. (NCT00567996)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 μg36.4
Salmeterol 50 μg38.5
Placebo42.6

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the 23 hour 10 minute and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose FEV1 readings. Mixed model used baseline FEV1, FEV1 prior to and 10-15 minutes post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol, and FEV1 prior to and 1 hour post inhalation of ipratropium as covariates. (NCT00567996)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 μg1.45
Salmeterol 50 μg1.39
Placebo1.28

Percentage of Days of Poor Control During 52 Weeks of Treatment

Percentage of days of poor control was defined as the number of days in the patient diary with a score ≥ 2 (scale of 0-3, a higher number means more severe symptoms) for at least 2 of 5 symptoms (cough, wheeze, production of sputum, color of sputum, breathlessness) over 52 weeks divided by the number of evaluable days (days with ≥ 2 symptoms with scores). The analysis included baseline percentage of days of poor control, FEV1 pre-dose and 30 minutes post-dose of salbutamol/albuterol during screening, and FEV1 pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose of ipratropium during screening as covariates. (NCT00393458)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Week 52)

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 300 μg Plus Placebo to Formoterol33.6
Indacaterol 600 μg Plus Placebo to Formoterol30.0
Formoterol 12 μg Plus Placebo to Indacaterol33.5
Placebo to Indacaterol Plus Placebo to Formoterol38.3

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12 + 1 Day, Day 85

FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of measurements made 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose at the end of treatment. The analysis included baseline FEV1, FEV1 pre-dose and 30 minutes post-dose of salbutamol/albuterol during screening, and FEV1 pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose of ipratropium during screening as covariates. (NCT00393458)
Timeframe: Week 12 + 1 day, Day 85

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 300 μg Plus Placebo to Formoterol1.48
Indacaterol 600 μg Plus Placebo to Formoterol1.48
Formoterol 12 μg Plus Placebo to Indacaterol1.38
Placebo to Indacaterol Plus Placebo to Formoterol1.31

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Gas Exchange Parameter HR

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionΔHR: beats/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI-2.481
Placebo-2.831

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Gas Exchange Parameter SaO2

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionSaO2: % (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI0.422
Placebo0.181

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Gas Exchange Parameter VCO2

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionΔVCO2: mL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI5.994
Placebo-4.251

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Oxygen Consumption (VO2; Obtained Via a Metabolic Cart)

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionmL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI11.366
Placebo1.252

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Oxygen Pulse (Defined as VO2/Heart Rate [HR]; VO2 is Obtained Via a Metabolic Cart; Used as a Surrogate for Stroke Volume)

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionmL/min/beats/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI0.256
Placebo0.168

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Spirometry.

FEV1/FVC. For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI0.017
Placebo-0.002

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2) to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in the Modified Borg Scale for Dyspnea

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). Modified Borg scale for dyspnea was self-administered at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21). The Borg scale is a 1-item instrument through which a subject reports dyspnea symptoms on a scale of 0-10 to quantify the intensity of dyspnea (where 10 is most intense). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI-0.452
Placebo-0.248

Change in RR

For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

Interventionbreaths/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI-0.193
Placebo-0.430

Change in Ti/Ttot

Change from pre-dose (Visit 2) to post-dose (Visit 5) assessment in fractional inspiratory time (Ti/total cycle time [Ttot]). For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI0.012
Placebo-0.004

Change in Ve

Change from pre-dose (Visit 2) to post-dose (Visit 5) assessment in minute ventilation (Ve). For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionmL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI838.232
Placebo-23.924

Change in Vt

Change from pre-dose (Visit 2) to post-dose (Visit 5) assessment in tidal volume (Vt). For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI71.904
Placebo14.281

Change in Vt/Ti

Change from pre-dose (Visit 2) to post-dose (Visit 5) assessment in mean inspiratory flow (tidal volume [Vt]/inspiratory time [Ti]). For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

InterventionmL/sec (Least Squares Mean)
Symbicort pMDI26.533
Placebo3.217

Change From Pre-dose (Visit 2)to Post-dose (Visit 5) Assessment in Spirometry.

Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and IC (using an slow vital capacity [SVC] maneuver; IC/total lung capacity [TLC] will be used as a measure of resting hyperinflation). For all outcome measures, treatment group estimates are LS Means across visits (change between 2 or more time points, calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point, e.g. LS means across visits up to Visit 5 minus pre-dose Visit 2 value). Estimate for difference = LS Mean (Symbicort pMDI 160mcg/4.5ug) - LS Mean (placebo). (NCT02533505)
Timeframe: Assessment (60 minutes pre and post dose) at Visit 2 (Day 0), Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 14), and Visit 5 (Day 21); change from baseline pre-dose to Day 21 post-dose reported.

,
InterventionFEV1: L; ΔFVC: L; ΔIC: L (Least Squares Mean)
ΔFEV1ΔFVCΔIC
Placebo-0.004-0.052-0.024
Symbicort pMDI0.1870.2590.256

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.070
Treatment B0.118
Treatment C0.153
Treatment D0.147
Treatment E0.002
Treatment F0.213

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time on Day 1

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1.~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.067
Treatment B0.086
Treatment C0.135
Treatment D0.149
Treatment E0.009
Treatment F0.192

Number of Patients Achieving Onset of Action - Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1

Number of patients achieving onset of action was defined as a change from baseline in post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1. These are the patients who contributed to the results, reported as median and 95% CI for 'time to onset of action' presented in Outcome Measure 8, above. (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment A90
Treatment B103
Treatment C103
Treatment D110
Treatment E74
Treatment F113

Time to Onset of Action (Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) on Day 1

Time to onset of action is defined as the time (in minutes) from receiving the study drug on Day 1, until the FEV1 change from baseline is ≥100 mL. (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Treatment A45.1
Treatment B32.6
Treatment C29.5
Treatment D27.3
Treatment E240.1
Treatment F28.1

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT Interval (QTcF)

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF).~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post doseQTcF, Day 1, 55 min post doseQTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A3.628.377.151.612.384.13
Treatment B5.375.418.651.140.090.85
Treatment C6.816.727.20-0.601.41-0.97
Treatment D6.259.905.451.674.151.73
Treatment E3.596.044.81-3.561.020.14
Treatment F5.565.436.771.413.192.50

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate (HR)

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Heart rate (HR)~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5m, +55m, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
HR, Day 1, 5 min post doseHR, Day 1, 55 min post doseHR, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A-8.85-7.19-7.57-1.72-1.52-2.30
Treatment B-6.62-8.29-6.75-1.060.41-0.01
Treatment C-7.78-8.28-9.20-1.61-1.10-1.13
Treatment D-7.64-9.59-7.46-1.85-1.40-0.73
Treatment E-4.84-7.44-6.123.921.122.49
Treatment F-5.54-7.19-8.961.701.22-1.47

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - PR Interval~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
PR Interval, Day 1, 5 min post dosePR Interval, Day 1, 55 min post dosePR Interval, Day 1, 2.5 h post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A7.247.208.480.440.882.50
Treatment B6.536.899.381.362.373.01
Treatment C6.088.217.58-0.111.910.16
Treatment D6.716.776.163.880.820.84
Treatment E3.064.385.84-1.36-1.13-1.22
Treatment F4.904.774.250.82-1.66-1.94

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Interval

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - QRS Interval~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
QRS Interval, Day 1, 5 min post doseQRS Interval, Day 1, 55 min post doseQRS Interval, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A1.180.971.380.611.121.49
Treatment B0.051.192.40-1.76-0.090.74
Treatment C1.501.211.800.430.850.30
Treatment D1.991.561.502.002.382.18
Treatment E0.450.140.640.450.771.14
Treatment F1.501.700.860.690.421.35

Change From Baseline in Average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) Total Score During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Change from baseline in average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) total score during inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period~E-RS in COPD uses 11 respiratory symptom items from the 14-item EXAcerbations of COPD tool (EXACT). E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity on a scale ranging from 0 to 40. Higher E-RS total scores indicate more severe symptoms and a declining total score indicates health improvement. E-RS questionnaire was completed by the patient each evening (e-diary).~Definitions:~For details on baseline, inter-visit periods, and the entire treatment period, please refer to outcome measure #15." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A-1.681-2.030-1.855
Treatment B-1.539-1.840-1.689
Treatment C-1.941-2.147-2.044
Treatment D-1.663-2.077-1.870
Treatment E-0.714-0.681-0.698
Treatment F-1.280-1.505-1.393

Change From Baseline in Average Use of Rescue Medication During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Evaluate the change from baseline in average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) during the inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period.~Results are shown as number of puffs/day; a decrease (implies improvement) from baseline in average use of rescue medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3 (Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0);" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
InterventionNumber of puffs/day (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A-0.72-0.59-0.66
Treatment B-0.58-0.50-0.54
Treatment C-0.53-0.51-0.52
Treatment D-0.71-0.69-0.70
Treatment E-0.30-0.17-0.23
Treatment F-0.52-0.40-0.46

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h), normalized by time on Day 1 of treatment (Week 0).~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 and at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-4h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1010.116
Treatment B0.1150.157
Treatment C0.1730.198
Treatment D0.1900.204
Treatment E0.0300.024
Treatment F0.1940.253

Change From Baseline in FEV1 Peak(0-4h) at Day 1 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at Week 6.~Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1970.212
Treatment B0.2110.255
Treatment C0.2600.305
Treatment D0.2880.301
Treatment E0.1360.143
Treatment F0.2990.356

Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-12h)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.0860.084
Treatment B0.1330.145
Treatment C0.1950.190
Treatment D0.2200.184
Treatment E0.011-0.029
Treatment F0.3050.298

Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-4)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1330.149
Treatment B0.1920.203
Treatment C0.2440.248
Treatment D0.2730.253
Treatment E0.0360.000
Treatment F0.3110.353

Change From Baseline in FVC Peak(0-4h) on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at the end of treatment at Week 6. Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.2930.322
Treatment B0.3720.379
Treatment C0.4140.431
Treatment D0.4550.427
Treatment E0.2130.182
Treatment F0.4910.530

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Evaluate the number of rescue medication-free days compared with baseline. Results are shown as percentage (%) of rescue medication-free days; an increased value indicates improvement from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0)." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
Intervention% of of rescue medication-free days (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A16.7813.8315.30
Treatment B15.6715.5115.59
Treatment C15.5514.0314.79
Treatment D18.1918.1518.17
Treatment E8.907.077.98
Treatment F13.5111.2712.39

Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 3 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6) of treatment. Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A0.0590.020
Treatment B0.0800.088
Treatment C0.1220.107
Treatment D0.1110.130
Treatment E0.000-0.012
Treatment F0.1220.112

Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 3 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in IC at treatment Visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment Visit 4 (Week 6). Spirometry was used to measure IC and was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline: value of the measurement recorded at 45 mins pre-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0); IC=Inspiratory capacity;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A0.1560.045
Treatment B0.1370.090
Treatment C0.1060.136
Treatment D0.1400.105
Treatment E0.0470.025
Treatment F0.0900.099

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 3 and Week 6

"Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6).~TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), with a total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.~Definitions:~Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A1.291.65
Treatment B1.552.02
Treatment C1.542.05
Treatment D1.942.55
Treatment E1.141.03
Treatment F1.662.11

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Response (Focal Score ≥1) at Week 3 and Week 6

"Number of subjects achieving TDI focal score ≥1, at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and at treatment visit 4 (Week 6).~TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement); total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.~Definitions:~Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 3 Focal Score ≥ 1Week 6 Focal Score ≥ 1
Treatment A7074
Treatment B7883
Treatment C7582
Treatment D8491
Treatment E6755
Treatment F7480

Vital Signs -- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

"Vital signs -- Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at prespecified times, using a 12-Lead single ECGs were recorded at all study visits (pre-dose at V1 (Week -2) and V3 (Week 3), as well as at pre-dose and 1.5 hours post-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Visit 4 (Week 6).~Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmHg) for representative timepoints.~Definitions:~Baseline=Values recorded pre-dose (Visit 2, Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug (Visit 2, Week 0);" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBP, Day 1, 30 min post doseDBP, Day 1, 30 min post doseSBP, Day 1, 1,5 h post doseDBP, Day 1, 1,5 h post doseSBP, Day 1, 11 h post doseDBP, Day 1, 11 h post doseSBP, Week 6, pre-doseDBP, Week 6, pre-doseSBP, Week 6, 30 min post doseDBP, Week 6, 30 min post doseSBP, Week 6, 1,5 h post doseDBP, Week 6, 1,5 h post doseSBP, Week 6, 11 h post doseDBP, Week 6, 11 h post dose
Treatment A-1.4-0.70.3-0.71.1-0.90.40.4-1.6-0.7-1.3-1.00.2-0.9
Treatment B-0.4-0.6-1.1-1.82.00.30.80.5-0.9-0.9-0.6-2.71.5-2.0
Treatment C-2.0-2.1-0.6-1.7-0.0-1.60.4-0.3-0.5-1.5-0.5-2.00.5-2.3
Treatment D-1.9-1.4-1.8-1.61.7-1.4-1.0-1.0-2.5-2.0-2.3-2.32.2-1.4
Treatment E-0.9-0.80.2-1.71.9-1.01.60.00.5-0.80.1-1.13.2-1.0
Treatment F-1.20.1-1.5-1.50.9-1.21.3-0.20.1-1.20.5-0.62.0-0.7

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change From Baseline

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change from baseline.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.~Results are presented as the number of subjects who had a change from baseline in QTcF of: > 30 msec, > 60 msec, and no prolongation (by > 30 msec or > 60 msec)." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795
Change from baseline: > 60 msecNo change from baseline (> 30 msec or > 60 msec)Change from baseline: > 30 msec
Treatment A19
Treatment B20
Treatment C21
Treatment D20
Treatment E16
Treatment F18
Treatment A0
Treatment B1
Treatment C0
Treatment D2
Treatment E2
Treatment F1
Treatment A102
Treatment B102
Treatment C100
Treatment D101
Treatment E103
Treatment F104
Treatment A2
Treatment B4
Treatment C9
Treatment E3
Treatment F4
Treatment D0
Treatment E0
Treatment A119
Treatment B119
Treatment C112
Treatment D121
Treatment E118
Treatment F119
Treatment A8
Treatment C5
Treatment D6
Treatment E4
Treatment F5
Treatment A113
Treatment C116
Treatment D116
Treatment E116
Treatment F118
Treatment A5
Treatment B12
Treatment C6
Treatment D5
Treatment E6
Treatment F8
Treatment B0
Treatment D1
Treatment E1
Treatment F0
Treatment A116
Treatment B111
Treatment C115
Treatment D117
Treatment E114
Treatment F115
Treatment B3
Treatment D3
Treatment F3
Treatment C121
Treatment D120
Treatment E121
Treatment F120
Treatment C7
Treatment D7
Treatment B123
Treatment C114
Treatment A6
Treatment B6
Treatment C3
Treatment F7
Treatment A115
Treatment B117
Treatment C118
Treatment F116

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female Subjects

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female subjects.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488794QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488797QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488795QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488793QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797
Actual value > 470 msecActual value > 500 msecNo prolongation (> 470 msec or > 500 msec)
Treatment B64
Treatment C67
Treatment E0
Treatment A3
Treatment F1
Treatment A55
Treatment F0
Treatment F57
Treatment A2
Treatment B3
Treatment A56
Treatment B65
Treatment C0
Treatment F56
Treatment A1
Treatment A57
Treatment B2
Treatment A0
Treatment B0
Treatment D0
Treatment A58
Treatment B66
Treatment D65
Treatment E52
Treatment B1
Treatment D1
Treatment B67
Treatment D64

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male Subjects

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male subjects.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488794QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488797QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488798QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488793QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488795QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488796QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796
Actual value > 450 msecActual value > 480 msecActual value > 500 msecNo prolongation (> 450 msec or > 480 msec or > 500
Treatment F1
Treatment B55
Treatment C54
Treatment F65
Treatment C1
Treatment A62
Treatment C53
Treatment E68
Treatment F63
Treatment B1
Treatment E1
Treatment B54
Treatment E66
Treatment F66
Treatment B4
Treatment C6
Treatment D4
Treatment E2
Treatment F5
Treatment E0
Treatment F3
Treatment B0
Treatment F0
Treatment B51
Treatment C47
Treatment D54
Treatment E67
Treatment F58
Treatment B2
Treatment C0
Treatment C51
Treatment F61
Treatment C3
Treatment A1
Treatment B53
Treatment C50
Treatment A3
Treatment B3
Treatment F4
Treatment A59
Treatment B52
Treatment F62
Treatment D3
Treatment F2
Treatment A0
Treatment A60
Treatment D55
Treatment A2
Treatment C2
Treatment D2
Treatment D0
Treatment A61
Treatment C52
Treatment D56
Treatment E69
Treatment D1
Treatment D57

Length of Stay

Time to discharge eligibility (hours) (NCT00410150)
Timeframe: Hospital discharge

Interventionhours (Mean)
Heliox Group66.2
Control Group63.4

Number of Subjects With a Change From Baseline Serum Lactate Following a One Hour Albuterol Nebulizer Treatment.

We powered our study to detect a difference of 0.5 mmol/L between pre and post-treatment lactate levels, but hypothesize that the difference will be greater than 1.0 mmol/L. (NCT02073747)
Timeframe: Change in serum lactate from baseline to 1 hour

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Normal Saline Control Group-0.15
Albuterol Trial Group0.77

Reviews

11 reviews available for albuterol and Dyspnea

ArticleYear
Improving the quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: focus on indacaterol.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2013, Volume: 8

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dys

2013
Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2013, Volume: 8

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; Formo

2013
Clinical Practice. Mild asthma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2013, Aug-08, Volume: 369, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Algorithms; Anti-Asthmatic Agents;

2013
Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2012, Volume: 7

    Topics: Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combi

2012
Effects of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD patients according to COPD severity and ICS use.
    Respiratory medicine, 2013, Volume: 107, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodila

2013
[Dyspnea and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
    Archivos de bronconeumologia, 2002, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dyspnea; Emotions; Exercise; Follow-Up S

2002
[The beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
    Przeglad lekarski, 2005, Volume: 62, Issue:7

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Delayed-Action Preparation

2005
[Fire-eater's lung. Two cases and review of the literature].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2006, Feb-17, Volume: 131, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Chest Pa

2006
Improving dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal treatment strategies.
    Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2006, Volume: 3, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dyspnea; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Ch

2006
The role of patient-centered outcomes in the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: how long-term studies contribute to our understanding.
    The American journal of medicine, 2006, Volume: 119, Issue:10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; B

2006
A paradoxical effect of bronchodilators.
    Chest, 1997, Volume: 111, Issue:6

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Acute Disease; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents;

1997

Trials

63 trials available for albuterol and Dyspnea

ArticleYear
Intermittent Tiotropium Bromide for Episodic Wheezing: A Randomized Trial.
    Pediatrics, 2022, 09-01, Volume: 150, Issue:3

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Fluticasone

2022
Sensory-mechanical effects of a dual bronchodilator and its anticholinergic component in COPD.
    Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2018, Volume: 247

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodil

2018
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for acute wheezing in young children: a randomised double-blind trial.
    The European respiratory journal, 2018, Volume: 51, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Intravenous; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child, Prescho

2018
Effect of fluticasone/salmeterol combination on dyspnea and respiratory mechanics in mild-to-moderate COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2013, Volume: 107, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind

2013
Perception of bronchoconstriction: a complementary disease marker in children with asthma.
    The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2013, Volume: 50, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bron

2013
A pilot study assessing the effect of bronchodilator on dynamic hyperinflation in LAM.
    Respiratory medicine, 2013, Volume: 107, Issue:11

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Do

2013
Effects of long-acting bronchodilators and prednisolone on inspiratory lung function parameters in stable COPD.
    Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Prep

2014
Comparing dynamic hyperinflation and associated dyspnea induced by metronome-paced tachypnea versus incremental exercise.
    COPD, 2014, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Albuterol, Ipratropium Drug Combination; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies;

2014
Repeated dyspnea score and percent FEV1 are modest predictors of hospitalization/relapse in patients with acute asthma exacerbation.
    Respiratory medicine, 2014, Volume: 108, Issue:9

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents;

2014
Immediate salbutamol responsiveness does not predict long-term benefits of indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    BMC pulmonary medicine, 2017, 01-31, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Dose-Response Rela

2017
A randomized controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to standard therapy in acute severe asthma.
    Iranian journal of allergy, asthma, and immunology, 2008, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Female

2008
Effects of arformoterol twice daily, tiotropium once daily, and their combination in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2009, Volume: 103, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Admini

2009
Endogenous opioids modify dyspnoea during treadmill exercise in patients with COPD.
    The European respiratory journal, 2009, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; beta-Endorphin; Bronchodilator Agents;

2009
Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
    Drugs, 2009, Jun-18, Volume: 69, Issue:9

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Broncho

2009
Combining triple therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with advanced COPD: a pilot study.
    Respiratory medicine, 2010, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administrati

2010
Combining tiotropium and salmeterol in COPD: Effects on airflow obstruction and symptoms.
    Respiratory medicine, 2010, Volume: 104, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Airway Obstruction; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method

2010
Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison.
    The European respiratory journal, 2011, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyspn

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Profiling the effects of indacaterol on dyspnoea and health status in patients with COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; F

2011
Improved respiratory system conductance following bronchodilator predicts reduced exertional dyspnoea.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method;

2011
Effects of beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination on lung hyperinflation and dyspnea in COPD patients.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2011, Volume: 6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Beclomethasone; Bronchodilator

2011
Randomized controlled trial of a breath-activated nebulizer in patients with exacerbation of COPD.
    Respiratory care, 2012, Volume: 57, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Inspiratory Capa

2012
Effect of levalbuterol on prehospital patient parameters.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 2002, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspne

2002
Effects of exercise and beta 2-agonists on lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2002, Volume: 93, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchoconstriction; Cross-Over Studies; Dyspnea; Exercis

2002
Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnoea at rest in COPD.
    The European respiratory journal, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-

2003
Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD.
    Thorax, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female;

2003
A comparison of the effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on exercise endurance in patients with COPD.
    Chest, 2003, Volume: 123, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Ant

2003
The reversibility of increased airways resistance in chronic heart failure measured by impulse oscillometry.
    Journal of cardiac failure, 2004, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Case-Control Studies; Double-Blind Method

2004
A short-term comparison of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol with ipratropium bromide/albuterol for the treatment of COPD.
    Treatments in respiratory medicine, 2004, Volume: 3, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; And

2004
Relief of dyspnoea by beta2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
    Respiratory medicine, 2004, Volume: 98, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator

2004
Early onset of effect of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Thorax, 2005, Volume: 60, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Analysis of Variance; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents;

2005
Responsiveness of continuous ratings of dyspnea during exercise in patients with COPD.
    Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2005, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Computers; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Exercise Test; Fema

2005
Beneficial effects of albuterol therapy driven by heliox versus by oxygen in severe asthma exacerbation.
    Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2005, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Dy

2005
[Clinical and functional benefits of adding theophylline to a standard treatment with short acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD].
    Revista medica de Chile, 2005, Volume: 133, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Bli

2005
Addition of salmeterol to existing treatment in patients with COPD: a 12 month study.
    Thorax, 2006, Volume: 61, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Forced E

2006
Additional clinical benefit of enoxaparin in COPD patients receiving salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in combination.
    Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 19, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anticoagulants; Blood Gas Analysis; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-B

2006
Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol on lung hyperinflation and exercise endurance in COPD.
    Chest, 2006, Volume: 130, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-Response Rela

2006
The effect of bronchodilators and oxygen alone and in combination on self-paced exercise performance in stable COPD.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Cross-Over Studies; Dyspnea; Exer

2007
The additive effect of theophylline on a combination of formoterol and tiotropium in stable COPD: a pilot study.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therap

2007
Onset of relief of dyspnoea with budesonide/formoterol or salbutamol following methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Respiratory research, 2006, Dec-04, Volume: 7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchoconst

2006
Nebulized arformoterol in patients with COPD: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-R

2007
Endurance shuttle walking test: responsiveness to salmeterol in COPD.
    The European respiratory journal, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cohort Studies; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Dys

2008
Inhaled corticosteroids as additional treatment in alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency-related COPD.
    Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2008, Volume: 76, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency; Beclomethasone; Broncho

2008
Effects of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and disodium cromoglycate on breathlessness induced by exercise in normal subjects.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1981, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Atropine Derivatives; Cromolyn Sodium; Dyspnea; Humans; Ipratropium; Physical Exer

1981
The assessment of dyspnea in bronchial asthma.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 1995, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Female; Forced

1995
Terbutaline vs albuterol for out-of-hospital respiratory distress: randomized, double-blind trial.
    Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 1995, Volume: 2, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Dysp

1995
Is an anticholinergic agent superior to a beta 2-agonist in improving dyspnea and exercise limitation in COPD?
    Chest, 1995, Volume: 108, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Alb

1995
Inhaled bronchodilators reduce dynamic hyperinflation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1996, Volume: 153, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspne

1996
Salmeterol reduces dyspnea and improves lung function in patients with COPD.
    Chest, 1997, Volume: 112, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-

1997
[Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of salmeterol in children with nocturnal dyspnea].
    Pneumonologia i alergologia polska, 1997, Volume: 65 Suppl 1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol

1997
Does inhaled albuterol improve diaphragmatic contractility in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1999, Volume: 160, Issue:6

    Topics: Action Potentials; Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodil

1999
Immunohistochemically stained activated eosinophils in sputum in patients with asthma.
    Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2000, Volume: 67, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibody Specificity; Asthma;

2000
The cumulative effect of long-acting bronchodilators, exercise, and inspiratory muscle training on the perception of dyspnea in patients with advanced COPD.
    Chest, 2000, Volume: 118, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyspnea;

2000
The spirometric efficacy of once-daily dosing with tiotropium in stable COPD: a 13-week multicenter trial. The US Tiotropium Study Group.
    Chest, 2000, Volume: 118, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Femal

2000
Effectiveness of salmeterol versus ipratropium bromide on exertional dyspnoea in COPD.
    The European respiratory journal, 2001, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Exercise Test; Female; Fo

2001
Unaltered perception of dyspnoea during treatment with long-acting beta2-agonists.
    The European respiratory journal, 2001, Volume: 18, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Bronchoconstriction

2001
Airway response to inhaled hypertonic saline in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2001, Nov-15, Volume: 164, Issue:10 Pt 1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator

2001
Potential masking effect on dyspnoea perception by short- and long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma.
    The European respiratory journal, 2002, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchial

2002
What is the optimal treatment strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations?
    The European respiratory journal, 2002, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Female; Fenoterol; Glucocorticoids;

2002
Measuring functional status in chronic lung disease: conclusions from a randomized control trial.
    Respiratory medicine, 1991, Volume: 85 Suppl B

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Lung;

1991
Mechanism of bronchodilator effect in chronic airflow limitation.
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1991, Jan-01, Volume: 144, Issue:1

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Albuterol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory V

1991
Acute response to bronchodilator. An imperfect guide for bronchodilator therapy in chronic airflow limitation.
    Archives of internal medicine, 1988, Volume: 148, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Aged; Albuterol; Analysis of Variance; Clinical Tr

1988
Effects of beta-agonists on breathlessness and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 1986, Volume: 49, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Clenbuterol; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; Forced Expiratory Vo

1986
The treatment of acute transient cough: a placebo-controlled comparison of dextromethorphan and dextromethorphan-beta 2-sympathomimetic combination.
    European journal of respiratory diseases, 1986, Volume: 69, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Albuterol; Cough; Dextromethorphan; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Dy

1986

Other Studies

57 other studies available for albuterol and Dyspnea

ArticleYear
Variation in Prehospital Protocols for Pediatric Respiratory Distress Management in the United States.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2022, Jul-01, Volume: 38, Issue:7

    Topics: Albuterol; Anaphylaxis; Asthma; Child; Croup; Dyspnea; Emergency Medical Services; Epiglottitis; Epi

2022
Response to Bronchodilators Administered via Different Nebulizers in Patients With COPD Exacerbation.
    Respiratory care, 2023, Volume: 68, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Humans; Nebulizers and Vapori

2023
Clinical course of asthma in 4 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 infection.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2020, Volume: 125, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Betacoronavirus; Black or African America

2020
Adult Patients with Respiratory Distress: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care.
    The western journal of emergency medicine, 2020, Jun-25, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; California; Dyspnea; Emergency Medical Services; Ho

2020
Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia diagnosed by transbronchial lung cryobiopsy: a case report.
    Journal of medical case reports, 2017, Apr-07, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Cough; Cryosur

2017
Aerosol furosemide for dyspnea: High-dose controlled delivery does not improve effectiveness.
    Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2018, Volume: 247

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Aerosols; Albuterol; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

2018
Neurologic manifestations in anaphylaxis due to subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy: A case report.
    Medicine, 2018, Volume: 97, Issue:18

    Topics: Albuterol; Anaphylaxis; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Desensitization, Immunologic; D

2018
Exertional dyspnea and operating lung volumes in asthma.
    Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2018, 09-01, Volume: 125, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Dyspne

2018
A woman with breathlessness: a practical approach to diagnosis and management.
    Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2013, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Disease Progression; Dyspnea; Female; Hea

2013
[Urgency of dyspnea in a resident assessed].
    Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers, 2014, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clinical Competence; Cooperative

2014
Radiological correlates and clinical implications of the paradoxical lung function response to β₂ agonists: an observational study.
    The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2014, Volume: 2, Issue:11

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Black or African American; Body Mass Index; Di

2014
Physical activity in COPD patients decreases short-acting bronchodilator use and the number of exacerbations.
    Respiratory medicine, 2015, Volume: 109, Issue:10

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents

2015
[Emergency checklist: Asthmatic attack].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2015, Sep-10, Volume: 157, Issue:15

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Checklist; Dyspnea; Emergencies; Female; Humans; Medical History Taking; M

2015
Prevalence and reversibility of lung hyperinflation in adult asthmatics with poorly controlled disease or significant dyspnea.
    Allergy, 2016, Volume: 71, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Disease Progression; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Huma

2016
You're the Flight Surgeon.
    Aerospace medicine and human performance, 2016, Volume: 87, Issue:9

    Topics: Aerospace Medicine; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cardiac Catheterization; Dyspnea; Echocardiogr

2016
Assessing mortality risk in COPD.
    Journal of insurance medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2008, Volume: 40, Issue:1

    Topics: Actuarial Analysis; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Body Mass Index; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchodi

2008
Metabolic acidosis, respiratory distress, and children with severe acute asthma.
    Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2009, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Acidosis; Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Child, Pre

2009
Effects of inhalational bronchodilator treatment during noninvasive ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.
    Journal of critical care, 2009, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Blood Gas Analysis; B

2009
Varicose bronchiectasis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
    Respiratory care, 2009, Volume: 54, Issue:11

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchiectasis; Bronchodilator Agents; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; Chest Wall Oscillation

2009
Nebulized formoterol provides added benefits to tiotropium treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Advances in therapy, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Eth

2009
Mass casualties from acute inhalation of chlorine gas.
    Southern medical journal, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:12

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Chem

2009
Disease severity and symptoms among patients receiving monotherapy for COPD.
    Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Comorbidity;

2011
Control maintenance can be predicted by exhaled NO monitoring in asthmatic patients.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Biomarkers; Dyspnea; Exhalation; Female; Forced

2011
A 48-year-old woman with chloride gas toxicity.
    Journal of emergency nursing, 2013, Volume: 39, Issue:3

    Topics: Albuterol; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorides; Dyspnea;

2013
Can a rare form of myasthenia gravis shed additional light on disease mechanisms?
    Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2013, Volume: 115, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Autoantibodies; Calcium Signaling; Carbon Dioxide;

2013
Dyspnoea worsened by salmeterol.
    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2002, Volume: 95, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Albuterol; Asthma; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchodilator Agents; Diagnosis, Differential;

2002
Case 3: presentation. Dyspnoea without wheeze unlikely to be caused by asthma.
    Paediatric respiratory reviews, 2001, Volume: 2, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Asthma, Exercise-Induced; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide;

2001
Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial.
    The European respiratory journal, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Inte

2003
Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial.
    The European respiratory journal, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Inte

2003
Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial.
    The European respiratory journal, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Inte

2003
Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial.
    The European respiratory journal, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Inte

2003
Early detection of cardiac disease masquerading as acute bronchospasm: The role of bedside limited echocardiography by the emergency physician.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2003, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchial Spasm; Bronchodilator Agents; Calcinosis; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Chil

2003
[The effect of time on the perception of dyspnea following inhaled long-acting bronchodilator].
    Harefuah, 2003, Volume: 142, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory Vol

2003
[Efficacy of bronchodilators: searching for objective criteria].
    Revue de pneumologie clinique, 2003, Volume: 59, Issue:2 Pt 2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Exe

2003
[Influence of orthopnoea position on spirometric and plethysmographic parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ].
    Pneumonologia i alergologia polska, 2003, Volume: 71, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Case-Control Studies; Dyspnea; Fem

2003
Breathlessness during exercise in COPD: how do the drugs work?
    Thorax, 2004, Volume: 59, Issue:6

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Exercise; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive;

2004
Dyspnea perception and reversibility of methacholine-induced unlimited airway narrowing in asthmatics.
    The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2006, Volume: 43, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchi; Bronchoconstriction; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expirato

2006
Symptom perception and adherence to asthma controller medications.
    Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2006, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Aw

2006
Bronchodilator response to adrenergic beta2-agonists: relationship to symptoms in an adult community.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Body Mass Index; Bronchoconstriction; Bronch

2007
Bronchodilator response to adrenergic beta2-agonists: relationship to symptoms in an adult community.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Body Mass Index; Bronchoconstriction; Bronch

2007
Bronchodilator response to adrenergic beta2-agonists: relationship to symptoms in an adult community.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Body Mass Index; Bronchoconstriction; Bronch

2007
Bronchodilator response to adrenergic beta2-agonists: relationship to symptoms in an adult community.
    Respiratory medicine, 2007, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Body Mass Index; Bronchoconstriction; Bronch

2007
[Expiratory flow limitation detected by negative expiratory pressure in patients with bronchial asthma].
    Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2006, Volume: 29, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Ex

2006
Outcomes in COPD patients receiving tiotropium or salmeterol plus treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2007, Volume: 2, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Bro

2007
Isbufylline, a new xanthine derivative, inhibits airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation in guinea pigs.
    European journal of pharmacology, 1993, Nov-16, Volume: 249, Issue:3

    Topics: 1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine; Acetylcholine; Albuterol; Animals; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchoal

1993
Acute pulmonary toxicity linked to use of a leather protector.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 1995, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Child; Cough; Dyspnea; Female; Household Products; Humans; Male; Oxyge

1995
Unexpected adverse effects of Freon 11 and Freon 12 as medication propellants.
    The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 1993, Volume: 93, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Chlorofluorocarbons, Methane; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Neb

1993
A week-long course of inhaled beta-agonist or anticholinergic agent may reduce dyspnea during exercise in COPD.
    Chest, 1996, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dyspnea; H

1996
Language of dyspnea in assessment of patients with acute asthma treated with nebulized albuterol.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1998, Volume: 158, Issue:3

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Airway Obstruction; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodila

1998
[Evaluation of bronchial obstruction. Dyspnea, the quality of life].
    Revue des maladies respiratoires, 1998, Volume: 15 Suppl 2

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Albuterol; Attitude to Health; Bronchi; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea;

1998
[Acute pulmonary edema associated with the use of beta2-mimetic tocolytic agents].
    Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 2000, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Dyspnea; Female;

2000
Clinically meaningful changes in quantitative measures of asthma severity.
    Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2000, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Pea

2000
Does spirometry predict dyspnoea in advanced cancer?
    Palliative medicine, 2000, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Chronic Disease; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans

2000
Factor analysis of changes in dyspnea and lung function parameters after bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2000, Volume: 162, Issue:1

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Humans; Lung Diseas

2000
Volume effect and exertional dyspnoea after bronchodilator in patients with COPD with and without expiratory flow limitation at rest.
    Thorax, 2002, Volume: 57, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Chronic Disease; Dyspnea;

2002
[Use of beta-adrenergic drugs in pediatric therapy].
    Minerva medica, 1976, Mar-13, Volume: 67, Issue:15

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Age Factors; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Dyspnea; Humans; Isoproterenol; Met

1976
[Comparative effectiveness of some beta-adrenergic drugs used in the treatment of asthma-like syndromes].
    Minerva medica, 1976, Mar-13, Volume: 67, Issue:15

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Drug Evaluation; Dyspnea; Humans; Metaproterenol; Respi

1976
Treatment of severe attacks of asthma in children with nebulized B2 adrenergic agents.
    Annals of allergy, 1978, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Albuterol; Asthma; Auscultation; Child; Child, Preschool; Dyspnea; Human

1978
[Bronchodilator action and side effects of salbutamol in patients with bronchospasm of the respiratory tract].
    Minerva medica, 1976, Apr-07, Volume: 67, Issue:17

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchitis; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Evaluation; Dyspnea; Female;

1976
Relationship between spontaneous dyspnoea and lability of airway obstruction in asthma.
    Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 1992, Volume: 82, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Airway Obstruction; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchi; Carbachol; Dyspnea; Female;

1992
[Wheezing dyspnea].
    Soins. Gynecologie, obstetrique, puericulture, pediatrie, 1990, Issue:108

    Topics: Albuterol; Child; Dyspnea; Humans; Male; Respiratory Sounds; Theophylline

1990
The relationship between pulmonary function and dyspnea in obstructive lung disease.
    Chest, 1989, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Male

1989
Bronchial asthma.
    The Practitioner, 1974, Volume: 212, Issue:1269

    Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Aerosols; Airway Obstruction; Albuterol; Aminophylline; Antigens; Asthm

1974