Page last updated: 2024-10-22

albuterol and Disease Exacerbation

albuterol has been researched along with Disease Exacerbation in 97 studies

Albuterol: A short-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist that is primarily used as a bronchodilator agent to treat ASTHMA. Albuterol is prepared as a racemic mixture of R(-) and S(+) stereoisomers. The stereospecific preparation of R(-) isomer of albuterol is referred to as levalbuterol.
albuterol : A member of the class of phenylethanolamines that is 4-(2-amino-1-hydroxyethyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol having a tert-butyl group attached to the nirogen atom. It acts as a beta-adrenergic agonist used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Plasma albuterol was significantly correlated with serum lactate concentration after adjusting for asthma severity."9.19Albuterol administration is commonly associated with increases in serum lactate in patients with asthma treated for acute exacerbation of asthma. ( Aubuchon, K; Ferguson, I; House, SL; Johnson, K; Lewis, LM; Matsuda, K; Schneider, J, 2014)
"Caregivers reported that they would use albuterol to treat their child's worsening asthma symptoms, but many described inappropriate use."9.14Home use of albuterol for asthma exacerbations. ( Freiner, D; Garbutt, JM; Highstein, GR; Nelson, KA; Smith, SR; Strunk, RC, 2009)
"The benefits of metered-dose inhalers with a spacer (MDI+S) have increasingly been recognized as an alternative method of albuterol administration for treating pediatric asthma exacerbations."9.05Metered-dose inhalers versus nebulization for the delivery of albuterol for acute exacerbations of wheezing or asthma in children: A systematic review with meta-analysis. ( Barrios-Sanjuanelo, A; Contreras-Arrieta, S; Florez-García, V; Payares-Salamanca, L; Rodriguez-Martinez, CE; Stand-Niño, I, 2020)
"To determine if nitrites (nitric oxide metabolites) measured in induced sputum decrease and correlate with improvement of clinical asthma symptoms after treatment, we performed a prospective longitudinal study in a tertiary care hospital in Arequipa, Peru."7.80Correlation between nitrites in induced sputum and asthma symptoms in asthmatic schoolchildren. ( Cáceres, M; Castro-Rodriguez, JA; Molina, RO; Recabarren, A, 2014)
"The Arg16 genotype of ADRB2 is associated with exacerbations in asthmatic children and young adults exposed daily to beta(2)-agonists, regardless of whether the exposure is to albuterol or long-acting agonists, such as salmeterol."7.75Adrenergic beta(2)-receptor genotype predisposes to exacerbations in steroid-treated asthmatic patients taking frequent albuterol or salmeterol. ( Basu, K; Lipworth, BJ; Mukhopadhyay, S; Palmer, CN; Tavendale, R, 2009)
"To identify the relationship between resource utilization and treatment of asthma in subjects who were first time users of controller therapies, either fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol delivered in a single Diskus device (FSC) or FP monotherapy."7.74An observational study of fixed dose combination fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone on asthma-related outcomes . ( Fuhlbrigge, A; Rey, GG; Riedel, A; Stanford, RH; Stempel, DA, 2008)
"Plasma albuterol was significantly correlated with serum lactate concentration after adjusting for asthma severity."5.19Albuterol administration is commonly associated with increases in serum lactate in patients with asthma treated for acute exacerbation of asthma. ( Aubuchon, K; Ferguson, I; House, SL; Johnson, K; Lewis, LM; Matsuda, K; Schneider, J, 2014)
"Children with mild persistent asthma should not be treated with rescue albuterol alone and the most effective treatment to prevent exacerbations is daily inhaled corticosteroids."5.15Use of beclomethasone dipropionate as rescue treatment for children with mild persistent asthma (TREXA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bacharier, LB; Bade, E; Boehmer, SJ; Chinchilli, VM; Covar, RA; Friedman, NJ; Guilbert, TW; Heidarian-Raissy, H; Kelly, HW; Lemanske, RF; Malka-Rais, J; Martinez, FD; Mauger, DT; Mellon, MH; Morgan, WJ; Sorkness, CA; Strunk, RC; Szefler, SJ; Taussig, L; Zeiger, RS, 2011)
" Here, we investigated the long-term effects of therapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) alone, salmeterol (SAL) alone, and a SAL/FP combination (SFC) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone fractures in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD in the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) study."5.14Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study. ( Anderson, JA; Calverley, PMA; Celli, B; Ferguson, GT; Jenkins, CR; Jones, PW; Vestbo, J; Willits, LR; Yates, JC, 2009)
" Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages."5.14Efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate by GOLD stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis from the randomised, placebo-controlled TORCH study. ( Anderson, JA; Calverley, PM; Celli, B; Ferguson, GT; Jenkins, CR; Jones, PW; Vestbo, J; Willits, LR; Yates, JC, 2009)
"Caregivers reported that they would use albuterol to treat their child's worsening asthma symptoms, but many described inappropriate use."5.14Home use of albuterol for asthma exacerbations. ( Freiner, D; Garbutt, JM; Highstein, GR; Nelson, KA; Smith, SR; Strunk, RC, 2009)
"The benefits of metered-dose inhalers with a spacer (MDI+S) have increasingly been recognized as an alternative method of albuterol administration for treating pediatric asthma exacerbations."5.05Metered-dose inhalers versus nebulization for the delivery of albuterol for acute exacerbations of wheezing or asthma in children: A systematic review with meta-analysis. ( Barrios-Sanjuanelo, A; Contreras-Arrieta, S; Florez-García, V; Payares-Salamanca, L; Rodriguez-Martinez, CE; Stand-Niño, I, 2020)
"Levalbuterol is an alternative to racemic albuterol with the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations."4.83Asthma pathophysiology and evidence-based treatment of severe exacerbations. ( Schreck, DM, 2006)
" Effectiveness of switch was assessed as the proportion without severe asthma exacerbation and the proportion achieving risk domain asthma control (RDAC; no asthma-related hospitalization, antibiotics without upper respiratory diagnosis or acute course of oral corticosteroids) and overall asthma control (OAC; RDAC and ≤ 200 μg salbutamol/≤500 μg terbutaline average daily dose) comparing 1 year after and before the switch."3.91Real-life effectiveness of inhaler device switch from dry powder inhalers to pressurized metred-dose inhalers in patients with asthma treated with ICS/LABA. ( Ban, GY; Carter, V; Hardjojo, A; Jie, JLZ; Lee, HY; Park, HS; Price, DB; Van Boven, JFM; Wan Yau Ming, S; Yoon, D, 2019)
"To determine if nitrites (nitric oxide metabolites) measured in induced sputum decrease and correlate with improvement of clinical asthma symptoms after treatment, we performed a prospective longitudinal study in a tertiary care hospital in Arequipa, Peru."3.80Correlation between nitrites in induced sputum and asthma symptoms in asthmatic schoolchildren. ( Cáceres, M; Castro-Rodriguez, JA; Molina, RO; Recabarren, A, 2014)
"To examine the use of intravenous magnesium in Canadian pediatric emergency departments (EDs) in children requiring hospitalization for acute asthma and association of administration of frequent albuterol/ipratropium and timely corticosteroids with hospitalization."3.78Magnesium use in asthma pharmacotherapy: a Pediatric Emergency Research Canada study. ( Black, KJ; Freedman, S; Gouin, S; Hernandez, A; Johnson, DW; Plint, A; Porter, R; Schuh, S; Zemek, R, 2012)
" Despite similar clinical asthma scores on hospital admission, the children with the Gly/Gly genotype had significantly shorter hospital ICU length of stay and duration of continuously nebulized albuterol therapy and were significantly less likely to require IV beta(2)-AR therapy than those with Arg/Arg or Arg/Gly genotypes."3.75Beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms affect response to treatment in children with severe asthma exacerbations. ( Carroll, CL; Schramm, CM; Stoltz, P; Zucker, AR, 2009)
"The Arg16 genotype of ADRB2 is associated with exacerbations in asthmatic children and young adults exposed daily to beta(2)-agonists, regardless of whether the exposure is to albuterol or long-acting agonists, such as salmeterol."3.75Adrenergic beta(2)-receptor genotype predisposes to exacerbations in steroid-treated asthmatic patients taking frequent albuterol or salmeterol. ( Basu, K; Lipworth, BJ; Mukhopadhyay, S; Palmer, CN; Tavendale, R, 2009)
"To identify the relationship between resource utilization and treatment of asthma in subjects who were first time users of controller therapies, either fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol delivered in a single Diskus device (FSC) or FP monotherapy."3.74An observational study of fixed dose combination fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone on asthma-related outcomes . ( Fuhlbrigge, A; Rey, GG; Riedel, A; Stanford, RH; Stempel, DA, 2008)
"Coronary vasodilator function and atherosclerotic plaque progression have both been shown to be associated with adverse cardiovascular events."2.87Evaluation of human coronary vasodilator function predicts future coronary atheroma progression. ( Baillie, TJ; Beltrame, JF; Delacroix, S; Honda, S; Howell, S; Kim, S; Montarello, N; Nicholls, SJ; Psaltis, PJ; Shishikura, D; Sidharta, SL; Worthley, MI; Worthley, SG, 2018)
"In exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, administration of high concentrations of oxygen may cause hypercapnia and increase mortality compared with oxygen titrated, if required, to achieve an oxygen saturation of 88-92%."2.87Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. ( Bardsley, G; Beasley, R; Berry, J; Fingleton, J; McKinstry, S; Pilcher, J; Shirtcliffe, P; Weatherall, M, 2018)
"30 patients presenting to ED with AECOPD were included."2.80Intravenous magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre, randomised, double-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial: a pilot study. ( Armstrong, P; Clayton-Smith, B; Hardy, M; Marchant, G; Marsh, E; Mukerji, S; Shahpuri, B; Smith, N, 2015)
"A core feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)."2.79Airway gene expression in COPD is dynamic with inhaled corticosteroid treatment and reflects biological pathways associated with disease activity. ( Alekseyev, YO; Heijink, IH; Hiemstra, PS; Lenburg, ME; Liu, G; Postma, DS; Spira, A; Steiling, K; Sterk, PJ; Timens, W; van den Berge, M, 2014)
"Patients with the most severe COPD may be more refractory to treatment."2.79Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 μg versus salmeterol 50 μg after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. ( Crater, GD; Dransfield, MT; Emmett, A; Ferro, TJ; Morris, AN; Ohar, JA; Raphiou, I; Sriram, PS, 2014)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions worldwide."2.79Comparison of conventional medicine, TCM treatment, and combination of both conventional medicine and TCM treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol of a randomized comparative effectiveness research trial. ( Li, JS; Li, SY; Xie, Y; Yu, XQ, 2014)
"The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Committee has proposed a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment framework focused on symptoms and on exacerbation risk."2.78A study to assess COPD Symptom-based Management and to Optimise treatment Strategy in Japan (COSMOS-J) based on GOLD 2011. ( Betsuyaku, T; Fujimoto, K; Hagan, G; Hitosugi, H; James, M; Jones, PW; Kato, M; Kobayashi, A, 2013)
"Exacerbations of COPD are associated with increased symptoms that persist for weeks and the course is very similar between a first and second exacerbation."2.77Prediction and course of symptoms and lung function around an exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Creemers, JP; Hop, WC; Postma, DS; Schreurs, AJ; van den Berge, M; van der Molen, T; van Noord, JA; Wouters, EF, 2012)
"Our data suggest that COPD patients benefit from the addition of Ismigen on top of the routine maintenance treatment with SFC."2.74Value of adding a polyvalent mechanical bacterial lysate to therapy of COPD patients under regular treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone. ( Cazzola, M; Di Perna, F; Noschese, P, 2009)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by an accelerated decline in lung function."2.73Effect of pharmacotherapy on rate of decline of lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the TORCH study. ( Anderson, JA; Calverley, PM; Celli, BR; Ferguson, GT; Jenkins, CR; Jones, PW; Knobil, K; Thomas, NE; Vestbo, J; Yates, JC, 2008)
"Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)--characterized by shortness of breath, increased sputum production, increased purulence, or a combination of these signs--are costly and can have major impacts on the patient's health."2.53Treating and preventing acute exacerbations of COPD. ( Aboussouan, LS; Hatipoglu, US, 2016)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide."2.52Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: definition, assessment, and prevention. ( Drummond, MB; Rennard, SI, 2015)
"The addition of FSC to subjects with COPD treated with tiotropium significantly improves lung function, quality of life and COPD exacerbations without increasing the risk of adverse events."2.50Benefits of adding fluticasone propionate/salmeterol to tiotropium in COPD: a meta-analysis. ( Li, M; Liu, Y; Mi, L; Shi, H; Sun, X; Yang, K; Zhang, D; Zhang, Y, 2014)
"Pregnancy is also associated with a physiological suppression of the immune system."2.49Management of asthma during pregnancy. ( Adams, SG; Levine, SM; Maselli, DJ; Peters, JI, 2013)
"A previously published, validated COPD progression model was updated with new exacerbation data and adapted to the Dutch setting by including Dutch estimates of healthcare use for COPD maintenance treatment and Dutch unit costs."2.48Which long-acting bronchodilator is most cost-effective for the treatment of COPD? ( Hoogendoorn, M; Kappelhoff, BS; Overbeek, JA; Rutten-van Mölken, MP; Wouters, EF, 2012)
"In people with COPD, the evidence is equivocal as to whether or not tiotropium offers greater benefit than LABAs in improving quality of life; however, this is complicated by differences in effect among the LABA types."2.48Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Chong, J; Karner, C; Poole, P, 2012)
"Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease contribute to the high mortality rate associated with the disease."2.46Management of COPD exacerbations. ( Evensen, AE, 2010)
"Influencing the progression of COPD has long been an elusive goal of drug therapy."2.45Insights into interventions in managing COPD patients: lessons from the TORCH and UPLIFT studies. ( Anzueto, A; Miravitlles, M, 2009)
"For the acute COPD studies, one was double-blind and randomised, one was single-blind and randomised, and one was open-label."2.45Use of dry powder inhalers in acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD. ( Borgström, L; Ingelf, J; Selroos, O, 2009)
"Airway inflammation is a key factor in the mechanisms of asthma."2.42Mechanisms of asthma. ( Busse, WW; Rosenwasser, LJ, 2003)
"Exacerbations of COPD are now the second largest cause of emergency hospitalisation in the UK."1.56Management of COPD exacerbations: pharmacotherapeutics of medications. ( Moore, D, 2020)
" Safety in terms of adverse events (AEs) was also examined."1.48Real-life effectiveness and safety of salbutamol Steri-Neb™ vs. Ventolin Nebules® for exacerbations in patients with COPD: Historical cohort study. ( Davis, E; Gefen, E; Gopalan, G; McDonald, R; Ming, SWY; Price, DB; Thomas, V, 2018)
"Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common lung diseases characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airway obstruction."1.42[Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome]. ( Bavbek, S; Çelik, G; Demir, T; Gemicioğlu, B; Günen, H; Kıyan, E; Mungan, D; Oğuzülgen, K; Polatlı, M; Saryal, S; Sayıner, A; Şen, E; Türktaş, H; Yıldırım, N; Yıldız, F; Yorgancıoğlu, A, 2015)
"A total of 77,480 newly-diagnosed COPD patients with a mean age of 68."1.40The association between inhaled long-acting bronchodilators and less in-hospital care in newly-diagnosed COPD patients. ( Kim, J; Kim, K; Kim, Y; Kim, YS; Lee, CK; Lee, JH; Lee, SD; Lee, SW; Oh, YM; Park, YB; Yoo, KH; Yoon, HK, 2014)
"The risks of COPD exacerbations and healthcare costs were compared between cohorts during 1 year of follow-up."1.38Observational study on the impact of initiating tiotropium alone versus tiotropium with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy on outcomes and costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Bechtel, B; Chatterjee, A; Crater, G; D'Souza, AO; Dalal, AA; Shah, M, 2012)
"Among those with confirmed COPD, dyspnoea was worse in those with more severe airflow limitation though exacerbation frequency was comparable across COPD stages."1.37Disease severity and symptoms among patients receiving monotherapy for COPD. ( Bailey, W; Crater, G; Dransfield, MT; Emmett, A; O'Dell, DM; Yawn, B, 2011)
"Prevalence of wheezing is increasing, bronchodilators are sub-optimally utilized and antibiotics are over-prescribed."1.35Are we adequately managing children with wheeze using the standard case management guidelines? ( Bunnag, T; Jatanachai, P; Lochindarat, S; Nisar, YB; Qazi, SA, 2008)
"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation, though relationships between exacerbation recovery, recurrent exacerbation and inflammation have not been previously reported."1.34Inflammatory changes, recovery and recurrence at COPD exacerbation. ( Donaldson, GC; Hurst, JR; Müllerova, H; Perera, WR; Sapsford, RJ; Wedzicha, JA; Wilkinson, TM, 2007)

Research

Studies (97)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (1.03)18.2507
2000's25 (25.77)29.6817
2010's67 (69.07)24.3611
2020's4 (4.12)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Pertzborn, MC1
Prabhakaran, S1
Abu-Hasan, M1
Baker, D1
Wu, S1
Wu, Y1
Hendeles, L1
Moore, D1
Payares-Salamanca, L1
Contreras-Arrieta, S1
Florez-García, V1
Barrios-Sanjuanelo, A1
Stand-Niño, I1
Rodriguez-Martinez, CE1
Xu, H1
Tong, L1
Gao, P1
Hu, Y1
Wang, H1
Chen, Z1
Fang, L1
Konno, S1
Makita, H1
Suzuki, M1
Shimizu, K1
Kimura, H2
Nishimura, M1
Forouzan, A1
Masoumi, K1
Delirrooyfard, A1
Asgari Darian, A1
Mokhtar Gandomani, L1
Morjaria, JB1
Rigby, AS1
Morice, AH1
Price, DB2
Gefen, E1
Gopalan, G1
McDonald, R1
Thomas, V1
Ming, SWY1
Davis, E1
Sidharta, SL1
Baillie, TJ1
Howell, S1
Nicholls, SJ1
Montarello, N1
Honda, S1
Shishikura, D1
Delacroix, S1
Kim, S1
Beltrame, JF1
Psaltis, PJ1
Worthley, SG1
Worthley, MI1
Rex, CE1
Eckerström, F1
Heiberg, J1
Maagaard, M1
Rubak, S1
Redington, A1
Hjortdal, VE1
Chachi, L1
Alzahrani, A1
Koziol-White, C1
Biddle, M1
Bagadood, R1
Panettieri, RA1
Bradding, P1
Amrani, Y1
Bardsley, G1
Pilcher, J1
McKinstry, S1
Shirtcliffe, P2
Berry, J1
Fingleton, J1
Weatherall, M2
Beasley, R3
Langton, D1
Ing, A1
Sha, J1
Bennetts, K1
Hersch, N1
Kwok, M1
Plummer, V1
Thien, F1
Farah, C1
Shafuddin, E1
Chang, CL1
Cooray, M1
Tuffery, CM1
Hopping, SJ1
Sullivan, GD1
Jacobson, GA1
Hancox, RJ1
Ibrahim, WH1
Rasul, F1
Ahmad, M1
Bajwa, AS1
Alamlih, LI1
El Arabi, AM1
Al-Mohannadi, D1
Siddiqui, MY1
Al-Sheikh, IS1
Ibrahim, AA1
Park, HS1
Yoon, D1
Lee, HY1
Ban, GY1
Wan Yau Ming, S1
Jie, JLZ1
Carter, V1
Hardjojo, A1
Van Boven, JFM1
Char, DS1
Ibsen, LM1
Ramamoorthy, C1
Bratton, SL1
Giubergia, V1
Gravina, L1
Castaños, C1
Chertkoff, L1
Castro-Rodriguez, JA2
Molina, RO1
Cáceres, M1
Recabarren, A1
van den Berge, M2
Steiling, K1
Timens, W1
Hiemstra, PS1
Sterk, PJ1
Heijink, IH1
Liu, G1
Alekseyev, YO1
Lenburg, ME1
Spira, A1
Postma, DS3
Lewis, LM1
Ferguson, I1
House, SL1
Aubuchon, K1
Schneider, J1
Johnson, K1
Matsuda, K1
Kim, J1
Kim, K1
Kim, Y1
Yoo, KH1
Lee, CK1
Yoon, HK1
Kim, YS1
Park, YB1
Lee, JH1
Oh, YM1
Lee, SD1
Lee, SW1
Betsuyaku, T1
Kato, M1
Fujimoto, K1
Hagan, G2
Kobayashi, A1
Hitosugi, H1
James, M1
Jones, PW5
Beeh, KM1
Glaab, T1
Stowasser, S1
Schmidt, H1
Fabbri, LM1
Rabe, KF1
Vogelmeier, CF2
Kaplan, A1
Gruffydd-Jones, K1
van Gemert, F1
Kirenga, BJ1
Medford, AR1
Ismaila, A2
Corriveau, D2
Vaillancourt, J2
Parsons, D2
Stanford, R1
Su, Z2
Sampalis, JS2
Dalal, A1
Tsuchida, T1
Matsuse, H1
Bateman, ED1
Mahler, DA1
Wedzicha, JA3
Patalano, F1
Banerji, D1
Liu, Y1
Shi, H1
Sun, X1
Zhang, D1
Zhang, Y1
Yang, K1
Mi, L1
Li, M1
Li, JS1
Xie, Y1
Li, SY1
Yu, XQ1
Bhatt, SP1
Wells, JM1
Kim, V1
Criner, GJ1
Hersh, CP1
Hardin, M1
Bailey, WC1
Nath, H1
Kim, YI1
Foreman, MG1
Stinson, DS1
Wilson, CG1
Rennard, SI2
Silverman, EK1
Make, BJ2
Dransfield, MT3
Ohar, JA1
Crater, GD1
Emmett, A2
Ferro, TJ1
Morris, AN1
Raphiou, I1
Sriram, PS1
Rodrigo, GJ1
Rossi, A1
van der Molen, T2
del Olmo, R1
Papi, A1
Wehbe, L1
Quinn, M1
Lu, C1
Young, D1
Cameron, R1
Bucchioni, E1
Altman, P1
Eriksson, G1
Calverley, PM5
Jenkins, CR4
Peterson, S1
Östlund, O1
Anzueto, A2
Drummond, MB1
Miller, AG1
Breslin, ME1
Pineda, LC1
Fox, JW1
Perez, T1
Chanez, P1
Dusser, D1
Devillier, P1
Wechsler, ME2
Yawn, BP1
Fuhlbrigge, AL1
Pace, WD1
Pencina, MJ1
Doros, G1
Kazani, S1
Raby, BA1
Lanzillotti, J1
Madison, S1
Israel, E3
Chauhan, BF1
Chartrand, C1
Ni Chroinin, M1
Milan, SJ1
Ducharme, FM1
Mukerji, S1
Shahpuri, B1
Clayton-Smith, B1
Smith, N1
Armstrong, P1
Hardy, M1
Marchant, G1
Marsh, E1
Şen, E1
Oğuzülgen, K1
Bavbek, S1
Günen, H1
Kıyan, E1
Türktaş, H1
Yorgancıoğlu, A1
Polatlı, M1
Yıldız, F1
Çelik, G1
Demir, T1
Gemicioğlu, B1
Mungan, D1
Saryal, S1
Sayıner, A1
Yıldırım, N1
Hatipoglu, US1
Aboussouan, LS1
Virchow, JC1
Backer, V1
Kuna, P1
Prieto, L1
Nolte, H1
Villesen, HH1
Ljørring, C1
Riis, B1
de Blay, F1
Denlinger, LC2
Phillips, BR1
Ramratnam, S1
Ross, K1
Bhakta, NR1
Cardet, JC1
Castro, M2
Peters, SP2
Phipatanakul, W1
Aujla, S1
Bacharier, LB3
Bleecker, ER1
Comhair, SA1
Coverstone, A1
DeBoer, M1
Erzurum, SC1
Fain, SB1
Fajt, M1
Fitzpatrick, AM1
Gaffin, J1
Gaston, B1
Hastie, AT1
Hawkins, GA2
Holguin, F1
Irani, AM1
Levy, BD1
Ly, N1
Meyers, DA2
Moore, WC1
Myers, R1
Opina, MT1
Peters, MC1
Schiebler, ML1
Sorkness, RL1
Teague, WG1
Wenzel, SE1
Woodruff, PG1
Mauger, DT2
Fahy, JV2
Jarjour, NN2
Quan-Jun, Y1
Jian-Ping, Z1
Jian-Hua, Z1
Yong-Long, H1
Bo, X1
Jing-Xian, Z1
Bona, D1
Yuan, Z1
Cheng, G1
Celli, BR2
Thomas, NE1
Anderson, JA4
Ferguson, GT4
Vestbo, J4
Knobil, K1
Yates, JC4
Stanford, RH1
Fuhlbrigge, A1
Riedel, A1
Rey, GG1
Stempel, DA1
Carroll, CL1
Stoltz, P1
Schramm, CM1
Zucker, AR1
Dhuper, S1
Chandra, A1
Ahmed, A1
Bista, S1
Moghekar, A1
Verma, R1
Chong, C1
Shim, C1
Cohen, H1
Choksi, S1
Lindmark, B1
Ramnarayan, P1
Chhabra, R1
Maheshwari, P1
Marchand, E1
Lochindarat, S1
Qazi, SA1
Bunnag, T1
Nisar, YB1
Jatanachai, P1
Vangveeravong, M1
Cazzola, M1
Noschese, P1
Di Perna, F1
Selroos, O1
Borgström, L1
Ingelf, J1
Miravitlles, M1
Garbutt, JM1
Freiner, D1
Highstein, GR1
Nelson, KA1
Smith, SR1
Strunk, RC3
Celli, B2
Willits, LR2
Calverley, PMA1
Basu, K1
Palmer, CN1
Tavendale, R1
Lipworth, BJ1
Mukhopadhyay, S1
Dalal, AA2
Petersen, H1
Simoni-Wastila, L1
Blanchette, CM1
Evensen, AE1
Dilaghi, B1
Modesti, PA1
Conti, AA1
Nozzoli, C1
McDonough, C1
Blanchard, AR1
Van den Bruel, A1
Gailly, J1
Neyt, M1
Bailey, W1
Crater, G2
O'Dell, DM1
Yawn, B1
Martinez, FD1
Chinchilli, VM1
Morgan, WJ2
Boehmer, SJ1
Lemanske, RF2
Szefler, SJ4
Zeiger, RS1
Bade, E1
Covar, RA1
Friedman, NJ1
Guilbert, TW1
Heidarian-Raissy, H1
Kelly, HW1
Malka-Rais, J1
Mellon, MH1
Sorkness, CA3
Taussig, L1
Price, D1
Roche, N1
Christian Virchow, J1
Burden, A1
Ali, M1
Chisholm, A1
Lee, AJ1
Hillyer, EV1
von Ziegenweidt, J1
Jenkins, C1
Spencer, MD1
Kemp, J1
Armstrong, L1
Wan, Y1
Alagappan, VK1
Ohlssen, D1
Pascoe, S1
Patel, M1
Perrin, K1
Wildfire, JJ1
Gergen, PJ1
Mitchell, HE1
Calatroni, A1
Kattan, M1
Teach, SJ1
Bloomberg, GR1
Wood, RA1
Liu, AH1
Pongracic, JA1
Chmiel, JF1
Conroy, K1
Rivera-Sanchez, Y1
Busse, WW2
Yasmin, S1
Mollah, AH1
Basak, R1
Islam, KT1
Chowdhury, YS1
Chatterjee, A1
Shah, M1
D'Souza, AO1
Bechtel, B1
Schuh, S1
Zemek, R1
Plint, A1
Black, KJ1
Freedman, S1
Porter, R1
Gouin, S1
Hernandez, A1
Johnson, DW1
Dodda, VR1
Spiro, P1
Hop, WC1
van Noord, JA1
Creemers, JP1
Schreurs, AJ1
Wouters, EF2
Sears, MR2
Molise, MC1
Maffey, AF1
Ramos, P1
Rubinstein, F1
Chong, J1
Karner, C1
Poole, P1
Hoogendoorn, M1
Kappelhoff, BS1
Overbeek, JA1
Rutten-van Mölken, MP1
Maselli, DJ1
Adams, SG1
Peters, JI1
Levine, SM1
Manthei, DM1
Seibold, MA1
Ahn, K1
Bleecker, E1
Boushey, HA1
Calhoun, WJ2
Chinchili, VM1
Icitovic, N1
King, T1
Kraft, M1
Lazarus, SC1
Lehman, E1
Martin, RJ1
Sheerar, D1
Shi, L1
Sutherland, ER1
Edwards, L1
Wadsworth, K1
Healy, B1
Jefferies, S1
Sternberg, AL1
Rosenwasser, LJ1
Marogna, M1
Falagiani, P1
Bruno, M1
Massolo, A1
Riva, G1
Schreck, DM1
Tashkin, DP1
Ameredes, BT1
Perera, WR1
Hurst, JR1
Wilkinson, TM1
Sapsford, RJ1
Müllerova, H1
Donaldson, GC1
Seemungal, TA1
Ansari, Z1
Stockley, RA1
Mcivor, RA1
Pizzichini, E1
Turner, MO1
Hussack, P1
Hargreave, FE1
Dennis, SM1
Sharp, SJ1
Vickers, MR1
Frost, CD1
Crompton, GK1
Barnes, PJ1
Lee, TH1

Clinical Trials (25)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Cardiopulmonary Function in Adults Born With a Ventricular Septal Defect[NCT03684161]95 participants (Actual)Observational2018-09-24Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Modified Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MN-221 When Administered Intravenously as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy to Adults With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma[NCT00683449]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated (stopped due to Data from Dose Groups 1,2 and other MN-221 studies resulted in the determination of a more appropriate dosing scheme for MN-221 in subjects with asthma.)
Evaluating the Control of COPD Symptoms in Patients Treated With Tiotropium Bromide 18mcg Once Daily Alone, ADOAIR 50/250mcg Twice Daily Alone or ADOAIR 50/250mcg Plus Tiotropium Bromide 18mcg[NCT01762800]Phase 4407 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Effect of Inhalation of Tiotropium Once Daily 18 Mcg Versus Salmeterol Twice Daily 50 Mcg on Time to First Exacerbation in COPD Patients (a Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, One-year Study).[NCT00563381]Phase 47,376 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison of Conventional Medicine, TCM Treatment and Combination of Both Conventional Medicine and TCM Treatment for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial[NCT01836016]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study of the Effects of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Combination Product 250/50mcg BID (ADVAIR DISKUS™) in Comparison to Salmeterol 50mcg BID (SEREVENT DISKUS™) on the Rate of Exacerbations of C[NCT01110200]Phase 4639 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A 12-Month Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Efficacy and Safety Study of Symbicort® pMDI 2 x 160/4.5 μg Bid and 2 x 80/4.5 μg Bid Compared to Formoterol Turbuhaler® 2 x 4.5 μg Bid and Placebo in Patients With COPD[NCT00206167]Phase 31,600 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A 6-Month Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Efficacy & Safety Study of SYMBICORT® pMDI 2 x 160/4.5 µg & 80/4.5 µg Bid Compared to Formoterol TBH, Budesonide pMDI (& the Combination) & Placebo in COPD Patients[NCT00206154]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase IIIB, 12-Month, Double-blind, Double-dummy,Randomised, Parallel-group, Multicentre Exacerbation Study of SYMBICORT® pMDI 160/4.5 μg x 2 Actuations Twice-daily and 80/4.5 μg x 2 Actuations Twice-daily Compared to Formoterol Turbuhaler® 4.5 μg x 2 I[NCT00419744]Phase 31,200 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Site and Mechanism(s) of Expiratory Airflow Limitation in COPD, Emphysema and Asthma-COPD Overlap[NCT03263130]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2017-01-01Recruiting
Evaluation of the Prevalence and the Reversibility of the Lung Hyperinflation in Uncontrolled Persistent Asthmatic Patients With Dyspnea[NCT01573364]450 participants (Actual)Observational2011-02-28Completed
Blacks and Exacerbations on LABA vs. Tiotropium (BELT)[NCT01290874]Phase 31,070 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-30Completed
Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) - University of Wisconsin[NCT01760915]107 participants (Actual)Observational2012-11-28Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Long-term Effects of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate (Seretide tm) 50/500mcg BD, Salmeterol 50mcg BD and Fluticasone Propionate 500mcg BD, All Delivered[NCT00268216]Phase 36,228 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subject[NCT03084796]Phase 2733 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-28Completed
An 8-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of CHF 718 pMDI (HFA Beclomethasone Dipropionate Via Pressured Metered Dose Inhaler) in Asth[NCT03084718]Phase 2610 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Incomplete Block Cross-over, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 1531 pMDI (Formoterol Fumarate) in Asthmatic Subjects[NCT03086460]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-08Completed
A Prospective Baseline Assessment of the Risk of Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and Outcomes After 2 Years; a Pilot Study[NCT01161680]30 participants (Actual)Observational2010-07-31Completed
Prescribing Asthma Controller Medication According to Gene Status to Improve Quality of Life in Young People With Asthma[NCT02758873]241 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Reducing Diagnostic Error to Improve Patient Safety in COPD and Asthma (REDEFINE Study)[NCT03137303]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
An Evaluation of Lung Function and Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Long-Acting Bronchodilator Monotherapy[NCT00791518]1,084 participants (Actual)Observational2008-12-31Completed
Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Treating Children to Prevent Exacerbations of Asthma (TREXA)[NCT00394329]Phase 3288 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ORal Bacterial EXtract for the Prevention of Wheezing Lower Respiratory Tract Illness (ORBEX)[NCT02148796]Phase 2822 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-03Active, not recruiting
Childhood Asthma Management Program[NCT00000575]Phase 31,041 participants (Actual)Interventional1991-09-30Completed
Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, 104-week Study to Compare the Effect of the Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination Product (SERETIDE*) 50/500mcg Delivered Twice Daily Via the DISKUS*/ACCUHALER* Inhaler With Tiot[NCT00361959]Phase 41,270 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Expressed as Percent of Predicted After Two Doses of Albuterol (5 mg Each) and Ipratropium (0.5 mg Each) When Compared to FEV1 at Hour 2 After the Start of the Infusion of MN-221 or Placebo.

The primary efficacy summary was change from Baseline in FEV1 (percent predicted), at Hour 2. Baseline was defined as FEV1 (percent predicted) after two doses of albuterol (5 mg each) and ipratropium (0.5 mg each) and FEV1 (percent predicted) FEV1 at Hour 2 was defined as the FEV1 (percent predicted) at 2 hours after the start of the infusion of MN-221 or placebo. Change from Baseline in FEV1 (percent predicted), was summarized by treatment group at Hour 2. (NCT00683449)
Timeframe: Baseline and Hour 2

InterventionFEV1 (percent of predicted) (Mean)
240 μg MN-221 i.v. (Intravenous) Infusion for 15 Minutes16.57
MN-221 Placebo i.v. Infusion3.88
1,000-1,080 μg MN-221 i.v.3.03
450 μg MN-221 i.v. for 15 Minutes4.27
1,995 μg MN-221 i.v. Over 15 Minutes and 25 Minutes-0.82

FEV1 (L) The Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second as Measured in Liters Per Second.

FEV1 (L) was determined over time using a spirometer. Measure the mean change in FEV1 (L) from Baseline. (NCT00683449)
Timeframe: Baseline to Hour 2

Interventionliters per second (Mean)
MN-221 at 16.0 μg/Min for 15 Min (Total 240 μg)0.60
Placebo Administered Intravenously0.10
450 μg MN-221 Given i.v.0.12
1,000-1,080 μg MN-221 Given i.v. for 15 Minutes0.10
1,995 MN-221 Administered i.v. for 15 Minutes and 25 Minutes-0.02

Hospital Admission Rate During Visit 1

After a patient in the emergency department (ED) presents with an acute exacerbation of asthma, the hospital proceeds with SOC procedures for this condition. Despite treatment in the ED, it is sometimes necessary to admit the patient into the hospital. In the study described here, the rate of hospital admissions was recorded. (NCT00683449)
Timeframe: Hour -1.5 through Hour 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
240 μg MN-221 i.v. (Intravenous) Infusion for 15 Minutes0
MN-221 Placebo i.v. Infusion7
1,000-1,080 μg MN-221 i.v.0
450 μg MN-221 i.v. for 15 Minutes3
1,995 μg MN-221 i.v. Over 15 Minutes and 25 Minutes1

Percentage of Participants Managed by TRIPLE Therapy

Percentage of participants managed by TRIPLE therapy was calculated as [(number of participants who switched to TRIPLE therapy) - (number of participants who stepped down)/ number of evaluable population]*100 (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD36.82
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID32.35

Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out

The percentage of participants who were withdrawn from the study. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD9
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID10

Percentage of Participants Who Required Additional Treatment to TRIPLE Therapy

The percentage of participants who required additional treatment to TRIPLE therapy is defined as number of participants who took additional medicine or therapy in TRIPLE therapy divided by number of participants who switch to TRIPLE therapy multiplied by 100. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD77.33
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID72.06

Percentage of Participants Who Stepped Down From TRIPLE Therapy to Initial Randomized Treatment

The percentage of participants who stepped down from TRIPLE therapy to initial randomized treatment was calculated as number of participants who step-down from TRIPLE therapy divided by number of participants who switch to TRIPLE therapy and then multiplied by 100. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD1.33
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID2.94

Percentage of Participants Who Switched to TRIPLE Therapy

Switched to TRIPLE therapy is defined as: 1. Date of switch: when SAL/FLU or TIO was administered additionally to randomised treatment. 2. Date of randomisation was a start point and timing of switching (first switch if there are more than once) to TRIPLE was event. For participants without switching, last day of study or follow up period was regarded as censored. Percentage of participants who switched to TRIPLE therapy was calculated as: number of participants who switched to TRIPLE therapy divided by number of evaluable population and then multiplied by 100. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD37.31
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID33.33

Percentage of Participants Who Used Relief Medication (Salbutamol)

Each evening participants recorded the number of occasions in the last 24 hours when they used their salbutamol for symptomatic relief of COPD symptoms. The percentage of participants who used relief medication in the study are presented. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single40.4
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE61.8
TIO 18 µg QD-Single43.7
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE70.7

Percentage of Participants Who Were Able to Remain on the Randomized Treatment

The randomized treatment could be switched to TRIPLE therapy in the case that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not controlled by the randomized treatment. Participants on TRIPLE therapy received SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID plus TIO 18 µg QD together. The percentage of participants who were able to remain on the randomized treatment was calculated by the following formula: 100 minus percentage of participants who switched over to TRIPLE therapy. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD62.69
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID66.67

Time to First Exacerbation by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)

The EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool (EXACT) is a 14-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) daily diary used to quantify and measure exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reported as units on a 0 [best health status] to 100 [worst possible status] scale). The day of detection of first exacerbation in any participant in each arm by EXACT. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Number)
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single0
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE0
TIO 18 µg QD-Single0
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE1

Time to First Exacerbation by Physician's Diagnosis

The day of detection of first exacerbation in any participant in each arm as diagnosed by physician. Exacerbation is defined primarily by physician's judgment. Date of randomisation will be start point and timing of exacerbation (first exacerbation if there are more than one) will be event. For subjects without exacerbation, last day of study or follow up period is regarded as censor. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Number)
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single3
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE5
TIO 18 µg QD-Single10
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE2

Time to First Switching to TRIPLE Therapy

The day of first switch to TRIPLE therapy (SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID+TIO 18 µg QD) for the first switching participant in each arm. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Number)
TIO 18 µg QD5
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID5

Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score

Participants were assessed for COPD symptoms by means of CAT at each Visit. This assessment was performed prior to the spirometry testing. A CAT total score of less than 10 represents best health status and greater than 15 represents worst health status. Baseline was the value at Visit 2 (randomization). Change from Baseline was calculated as specific timepoint value minus Visit 2 value. Scores were assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). Scores range from 0 to 40, high value in score indicate worse outcome. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Visit 3, n=132, 68, 121, 75Visit 4, n=127, 68, 116, 74Visit 5, n=123, 68, 116, 73Visit 6, n=120, 66, 115, 74Visit 7, n=120, 66, 113, 71Visit 8, n=117, 66, 113, 70
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single-1.6-1.7-1.6-2.3-2.0-2.4
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE0.1-0.2-0.80.0-0.8-1.0
TIO 18 µg QD-Single0.1-0.3-0.7-0.7-0.8-1.4
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE2.11.60.80.0-0.6-0.5

Change From Baseline in FEV1

FEV1 is defined as the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one second. Baseline was a value at Visit 2 (randomization). Change from Baseline was calculated as specific timepoint value minus Visit 2 value. FEV1 was assessed at Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2) and up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Visit 3; n=131, 68, 119, 75Visit 4; n=127, 68, 116, 74Visit 5; n=122, 68, 116, 72Visit 6; n=120, 66, 114, 74Visit 7; n=119, 66, 113, 71Visit 8; n=117, 66, 113, 70
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single0.0240.008-0.010-0.007-0.012-0.019
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE-0.043-0.030-0.0010.0270.0180.049
TIO 18 µg QD-Single0.007-0.011-0.0060.002-0.010-0.017
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE-0.077-0.0320.0050.0370.0500.027

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score

Participants were assessed for COPD symptoms by means of CAT at each Visit. This assessment was performed prior to the spirometry testing. A CAT total score of less than 10 represents best health status and greater than 15 represents worst health status. Scores were assessed at Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). Scores range from 0 to 40, high value in score indicate worse outcome. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1, n=136, 68, 126, 75Visit 2, n=136, 68, 126, 75Visit 3, n=132, 68, 121, 75Visit 4, n=127, 68, 116, 74Visit 5, n=123, 68, 116, 73Visit 6, n=120, 66, 115, 74Visit 7, n=120, 66, 113, 71Visit 8, n=117, 66, 113, 70
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single11.39.98.48.38.37.47.77.2
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE13.313.413.513.212.613.312.412.3
TIO 18 µg QD-Single11.29.69.28.88.48.58.37.8
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE13.412.114.313.612.812.011.411.6

Comparison of Number of Exacerbations Between Two Detection Methods: EXACT and Physician Diagnosis

The comparison of number of exacerbation between two detection methods EXACT and physician diagnosis: number of exacerbations detected by EXACT and number of exacerbations judged by physician. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionNumber of exacerbations (Mean)
EXACTPhysician's diagnosis
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID0.70.1
TIO 18 µg QD0.90.2

Continuation Percentage of Participants Managed by Randomized Treatment Plus TRIPLE Therapy

The randomized treatment could be switched to TRIPLE therapy in the case that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not controlled by the randomized treatment. Participants on TRIPLE therapy received SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID plus TIO 18 µg QD together. Continuation TRIPLE proportion is defined as [(number of subjects who switched to TRIPLE) - (number of subjects who stepped down)/ number of evaluable population]*100. Randomised treatment continuation proportion is calculated by a formula: (100 - switch proportion). (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Randomised treatmentTRIPLE therapy
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID66.6732.35
TIO 18 µg QD62.6936.82

E-RS Subscale Score

The E-RS total score is an 11-item patient questionnaire, which provides information specific to respiratory symptoms-severity of respiratory symptoms overall and severity of breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms. The E-RS subscale scores for respiratory symptoms (RS)-breathlessness (RS-BRL), RS-cough and sputum (RS-CSP), and RS-chest symptoms (RS-CSY) are presented. Scores were assessed at Baseline, Week 1-4, Week 5-8, Week 9-12, Week 13-16, Week 17-20 and at Week 21-24. Daily EXACT total score is obtained as total score of 14 items from diary. Daily E-RS total score as 11 items and Daily E-RS subscale scores are subset of E-RS total score. Mean EXACT total score is mean value of daily EXACT total score within subject by every 4 weeks(Week1-4, Week5-8, Week9-12, Week13-16, Week17-20, Week21-24). Same calculation of mean values are applied to E-RS total and E-RS subscale scores. RS total scores range from 0 to 40, high value in score indicate worse outcome. (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
RS-BRL; Baseline; n=135, 68, 125, 73RS-BRL; Week 1-4; n=131, 68, 121, 75RS-BRL; Week 5-8; n=126, 68, 115, 73RS-BRL; Week 9-12; n=122, 68, 116, 74RS-BRL; Week 13-16; n=121, 66, 116, 74RS-BRL; Week 17-20; n=118, 66, 114, 72RS-BRL; Week 21-24; n=93, 51, 94, 51RS-CSP; Baseline; n=135, 68, 124, 73RS-CSP; Week 1-4; n=131, 68, 121, 75RS-CSP; Week 5-8; n=126, 68, 116, 73RS-CSP; Week 9-12; n=122, 68, 116, 74RS-CSP; Week 13-16; n=121, 66, 116, 74RS-CSP; Week 17-20; n=119, 66, 114, 72RS-CSP; Week 21-24; n=93, 51, 94, 51RS-CSY; Baseline; n=135, 67, 125, 73RS-CSY; Week 1-4; n=131, 68, 121, 75RS-CSY; Week 5-8; n=126, 68, 116, 73RS-CSY; Week 9-12; n=122, 68, 116, 74RS-CSY; Week 13-16; n=121, 66, 116, 74RS-CSY; Week 17-20; n=119, 66, 114, 72RS-CSY; Week 21-24; n=93, 51, 94, 51
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single3.363.063.083.082.802.822.792.292.122.032.061.982.061.821.771.581.651.541.461.481.38
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE5.816.285.965.875.815.564.942.732.902.832.812.742.432.272.933.213.053.123.112.812.61
TIO 18 µg QD-Single3.413.363.182.983.043.042.952.232.132.132.112.092.091.991.841.691.701.601.701.721.64
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE5.626.595.385.525.114.944.712.813.052.742.772.492.402.342.923.592.993.012.662.552.53

EXACT Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score

"The E-RS total score is an 11-item patient questionnaire, which provides information specific to respiratory symptoms-severity of respiratory symptoms overall and severity of breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms. Scores were assessed at Baseline, Week 1-4, Week 5-8, Week 9-12, Week 13-16, Week 17-20 and at Week 21-24. Daily EXACT total score is obtained as total score of 14 items from diary. Daily E-RS total score as 11 items and Daily E-RS subscale scores are subset of E-RS total score.~Mean EXACT total score is mean value of daily EXACT total score within subject by every 4 weeks(Week1-4, Week5-8, Week9-12, Week13-16, Week17-20, Week21-24). Same calculation of mean values are applied to E-RS total and E-RS subscale scores. Scores range from 0-100, high value in score indicate worse outcome." (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=135, 67, 124, 73Week 1-4; n=131, 68, 121, 75Week 5-8; n=126, 68, 115, 73Week 9-12; n=122, 68, 116, 74Week 13-16; n=121, 66, 116, 74Week 17-20; n=118, 66, 114, 72Week 21-24; n=93, 51, 94, 51
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single7.426.766.756.696.236.335.99
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE11.4312.3911.8611.7911.6610.809.82
TIO 18 µg QD-Single7.517.186.996.706.826.856.58
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE11.3613.2311.1111.3010.269.899.59

EXACT Total Score.

"EXACT is a 14-item patient questionnaire used as a measure of respiratory symptoms (reported as units on a 0 [best health status] to 100 [worst possible status] scale). Scores were assessed at Baseline, Week 1-4, Week 5-8, Week 9-12, Week 13-16, Week 17-20 and Week 21-24. Daily EXACT total score is obtained as total score of 14 items from diary. Daily E-RS total score as 11 items and Daily E-RS subscale scores are subset of E-RS total score.~Mean EXACT total score is mean value of daily EXACT total score within subject by every 4 weeks(Week1-4, Week5-8, Week9-12, Week13-16, Week17-20, Week21-24). Same calculation of mean values are applied to E-RS total and E-RS subscale scores." (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=125, 66, 111, 71Week 1-4; n=120, 67, 109, 73Week 5-8; n=117, 63, 102, 69Week 9-12; n=109, 67, 101, 72Week 13-16; n=105, 65, 100, 71Week 17-20; n=107, 65, 97, 66Week 21-24; n=79, 51, 77, 46
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single28.9927.8327.3527.6327.3326.9826.50
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE36.0036.9237.5836.1635.9234.9232.72
TIO 18 µg QD-Single29.7728.8828.8028.4028.9328.6628.80
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE35.7838.2635.8735.5733.7934.0333.67

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is defined as the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one second. At Screening (Visit 1) spirometric assessments were conducted before (Visit 1A) and 30 to 60 minutes after a bronchodilator challenge (400 µg of salbutamol) (Visit 1B). FEV1 during each visit are presented. FEV1 was assessed at Visit 1A (Screening), Visit 1B (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Visit 1A; n=136, 68, 126, 75Visit 1B; n=136, 68, 126, 75Visit 2; n=136, 68, 126, 75Visit 3; n=131, 68, 119, 75Visit 4; n=127, 68, 116, 74Visit 5; n=122, 68, 116, 72Visit 6; n=120, 66, 114, 74Visit 7; n=119, 66, 113, 71Visit 8; n=117, 66, 113, 70
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single1.6871.7641.6951.7311.7131.7181.7161.7101.694
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE1.4011.4711.3851.3421.3551.3841.4131.4041.435
TIO 18 µg QD-Single1.6751.7541.6811.7101.7031.7081.7121.6941.688
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE1.3491.4291.3621.2851.3361.3761.4051.4231.390

Number of Participants in Each Treatment Efficacy Grade Evaluated by Participants

Participants evaluated treatment efficacy by using the following grades: significantly improved (SII), moderately improved (MOI), mildly improved (MII), no change (NC), mildly worse (MIW), moderately worse (MOW), and significantly worse (SIW). Treatment efficacy was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 3; SIIVisit 3; MOIVisit 3; MIIVisit 3; NCVisit 3; MIWVisit 3; MOWVisit 3; SIWVisit 4; SIIVisit 4; MOIVisit 4; MIIVisit 4; NCVisit 4; MIWVisit 4; MOWVisit 5; SIIVisit 5; MOIVisit 5; MIIVisit 5; NCVisit 5; MIWVisit 5; MOWVisit 5; SIWVisit 6; SIIVisit 6; MOIVisit 6; MIIVisit 6; NCVisit 6; MIWVisit 6; MOWVisit 6; SIWVisit 7; SIIVisit 7; MOIVisit 7; MIIVisit 7; NCVisit 7; MIWVisit 7; MOWVisit 8; SIIVisit 8; MOIVisit 8; MIIVisit 8; NCVisit 8; MIWVisit 8; MOW
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single593574711315316710121331661001213356640011327754059395851
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE02103219501612398217173472014163311012417375114193750
TIO 18 µg QD-Single132085930252579502331782002430727002528717028306931
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE137322291162128135462031930413143472041120269149193440

Number of Participants in Each Treatment Efficacy Grade Evaluated by Physician

Physician evaluated treatment efficacy by using the following grades: significantly improved (SII), moderately improved (MOI), mildly improved (MII), no change (NC), mildly worse (MIW), moderately worse (MOW), and significantly worse (SIW). Treatment efficacy was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 8), Visit 5 (Week 8), Visit 6 (Week 12), Visit 7 (Week 16), and Visit 8 (Week 24). (NCT01762800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 3; SIIVisit 3; MOIVisit 3; MIIVisit 3; NCVisit 3; MIWVisit 3; MOWVisit 3; SIWVisit 4; SIIVisit 4; MOIVisit 4; MIIVisit 4; NCVisit 4; MIWVisit 4; MOWVisit 4; SIWVisit 5; SIIVisit 5; MOIVisit 5; MIIVisit 5; NCVisit 5; MIWVisit 5; MOWVisit 5; SIWVisit 6; SIIVisit 6; MOIVisit 6; MIIVisit 6; NCVisit 6; MIWVisit 6; MOWVisit 6; SIWVisit 7; SIIVisit 7; MOIVisit 7; MIIVisit 7; NCVisit 7; MIWVisit 7; MOWVisit 8; SIIVisit 8; MOIVisit 8; MIIVisit 8; NCVisit 8; MIWVisit 8; MOW
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-Single611406770131428746111122973701210317430001325793027367011
SAL/FLU 50/250 µg BID-TRIPLE01123116801313331260261435101011183311111218385214193921
TIO 18 µg QD-Single15218373128237940024228350023287210002523775137277141
TIO 18 µg QD-TRIPLE143322312009182712804819291030211173293031212358139134050

COPD Exacerbations Per Patient-year

(NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per patient-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.64
Salmeterol0.72

COPD Exacerbations Per Patient-year Leading to Hospitalisation

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionHospitalizations per patient-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.09
Salmeterol0.13

COPD Exacerbations Treated With Antibiotics Per Patient-year

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per patient-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.53
Salmeterol0.59

COPD Exacerbations Treated With Systemic Steroids and Antibiotics Per Patient-year

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per patient-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.23
Salmeterol0.28

COPD Exacerbations Treated With Systemic Steroids Per Patient-year

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per patient-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.33
Salmeterol0.41

First Occurrence of (Moderate or Severe) COPD Exacerbation

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium1277
Salmeterol1414

First Occurrence of COPD Exacerbation Leading to Hospitalization

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation leading to hospitalisation and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium262
Salmeterol336

First Occurrence of COPD Exacerbation or Discontinuation of Trial Medication Because of Worsening of Underlying Disease, Whichever Comes First

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation or discontinuation of trial medication because of worsening of underlying disease, whichever comes first and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium1316
Salmeterol1448

First Occurrence of COPD Exacerbations Treated With Antibiotics

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation treated with antibiotics and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium1154
Salmeterol1259

First Occurrence of COPD Exacerbations Treated With Systemic Steroids

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation treated with systemic steroids and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium715
Salmeterol852

First Occurrence of COPD Exacerbations Treated With Systemic Steroids and Antibiotics

First occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to first exacerbation treated with systemic steroids and antibiotics and reported as hazard ratio. An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium562
Salmeterol671

Occurrence of Premature Discontinuation of Trial Medication

Occurrence analysed by Cox regression as time to premature discontinuation of trial medication and reported as hazard ratio (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionnumber of first occurrences (Number)
Tiotropium585
Salmeterol648

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 1

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium222.85
Salmeterol224.45

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 10

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium230.30
Salmeterol231.27

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 11

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium230.61
Salmeterol231.91

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 12

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium231.04
Salmeterol232.04

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 13

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium231.23
Salmeterol231.89

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 14

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium231.19
Salmeterol232.42

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 15

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium231.64
Salmeterol232.75

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 16

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium232.06
Salmeterol232.65

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 2

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium225.15
Salmeterol227.21

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 3

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium226.31
Salmeterol228.38

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 4

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium227.37
Salmeterol229.25

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 5

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium228.27
Salmeterol229.37

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 6

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium228.80
Salmeterol229.81

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 7

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium229.35
Salmeterol230.13

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 8

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium229.95
Salmeterol230.43

Pre-dose Morning PEFR Measured by Patients at Home During the First Four Months of Randomised Treatment (Weekly Means Will be Calculated), Week 9

PEFR means peak expiratory flow rate and is measured in liter per minute (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionliter per minute (L/min) (Mean)
Tiotropium229.72
Salmeterol230.57

Number of Participants With at Least One COPD Exacerbation

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with (at least one) eventParticipants with no event
Salmeterol14142255
Tiotropium12772430

Number of Participants With at Least One COPD Exacerbation Leading to Hospitalisation

An exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of more than 1 symptom (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness), with at least 1 symptom lasting at least 3 days and requiring treatment with systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate exacerbation) or hospitalisation (severe exacerbation). (NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with (at least one) eventParticipants with no event
Salmeterol3363333
Tiotropium2623445

Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Trial Medication

(NCT00563381)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with (at least one) eventParticipants with no event
Salmeterol6483021
Tiotropium5853122

Number of EXs of COPD Requiring Hospitalization That Occurred More Than 21 Days Post-discharge or Physician's Office Visit for an EX of COPD Requiring Treatment With OCSs or OCSs and ABs

A COPD EX was defined as the worsening of >=2 major symptoms (dyspnoea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [containing/discharging pus]) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (sore throat, cold [nasal discharge and/or nasal conjestion], fever without other cause, increased cough or wheeze) for at least 2 consecutive days. COPD EXs were identified by symptom review, and/or were based on investigator judgment (via phone contact or at a clinic visit). Hospitalization had to occur more than 21 days post-discharge or physician's office visit for a prior COPD EX. (NCT01110200)
Timeframe: From 21 days post-discharge (hospital or emergency room) or physician's office visit, up to 29 weeks

InterventionExacerbations (Number)
FSC 250/5050
SAL 5051

Number of Par. With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) EXs Requiring Hospitalization That Occurred >21 Days Post-discharge/Physician's Office Visit for a COPD EX Requiring Treatment With Oral Corticosteroids (OCSs) or OCSs and Antibiotics (ABs)

A COPD exacerbation (EX) was defined as the worsening of >=2 major symptoms (dyspnoea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [containing/discharging pus]) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (sore throat, cold [nasal discharge and/or nasal conjestion], fever without other cause, increased cough or wheeze) for at least 2 consecutive days. COPD EXs were identified by symptom review, and/or were based on investigator judgment (via phone contact or at a clinic visit). Hospitalization had to occur >21 days post-discharge/physician's office visit for a prior COPD EX. (NCT01110200)
Timeframe: From 21 days post-discharge (hospital or emergency room) or physician's office visit, up to 29 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FSC 250/5043
SAL 5039

Number of Participants With an EX of COPD Requiring Treatment With OCSs, Treatment With ABs, and/or Hospitalization

A COPD EX was defined as the worsening of >=2 major symptoms (dyspnoea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [containing/discharging pus]) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (sore throat, cold [nasal discharge and/or nasal conjestion], fever without other cause, increased cough or wheeze) for at least 2 consecutive days. COPD EXs were identified by symptom review, and/or were based on investigator judgment (via phone contact or at a clinic visit). (NCT01110200)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 29, approximately

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FSC 250/50102
SAL 50115

Number of EXs of COPD Requiring Treatment With OCSs, Treatment With ABs, and/or Hospitalization (Alone and in Combination)

A COPD EX was defined as the worsening of >=2 major symptoms (dyspnoea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [containing/discharging pus]) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (sore throat, cold [nasal discharge and/or nasal conjestion], fever without other cause, increased cough or wheeze) for at least 2 consecutive days. COPD EXs were identified by symptom review, and/or were based on investigator judgment (via phone contact or at a clinic visit). (NCT01110200)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 29, approximately

,
Interventionexacerbations (Number)
Number of EXs, n=314,325Number of EXs requiring hospitalization, n=156,182Number of EXs treated with OCSs, n=156, 182Number of EXs treated with ABs, n=156, 182
FSC 250/5015650140121
SAL 5018251167144

Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of EXs of COPD Requiring Hospitalization That Occurred More Than 21 Days Post-discharge or Physician's Office Visit for an EX of COPD Requiring Treatment With OCSs or OCSs and ABs

A COPD EX was defined as the worsening of >=2 major symptoms (dyspnoea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [containing/discharging pus]) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (sore throat, cold [nasal discharge and/or nasal conjestion], fever without other cause, increased cough or wheeze) for at least 2 consecutive days. COPD EXs were identified by symptom review, and/or were based on investigator judgment (via phone contact or at a clinic visit). Hospitalization had to occur more than 21 days post-discharge or physician's office visit for a prior COPD EX. (NCT01110200)
Timeframe: From 21 days post-discharge (hospital or emergency room) or physician's office visit, up to 29 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
01234
FSC 250/5027136700
SAL 5028631521

Dyspnea Symptom Scores

Change from baseline of Dyspnea symptoms evaluated using the breathlessness diary, a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating a more severe manifestation of the Dyspnea symptom. Change from baseline was calculated by averaging treatment period Dyspnea scores and subtracting the baseline Dyspnea scores. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID-0.30
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID-0.29
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID-0.24

Evening PEF

Change in evening PEF from baseline to the average of the randomized treatment period, as calculated by averaging treatment period PEF values and subtracting the baseline evening PEF value. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionL/min (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID17.62
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID17.77
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID14.08

Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

Change in morning PEF from baseline to the average of the randomized treatment period, as calculated by averaging treatment period PEF values and subtracting the baseline morning PEF value. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionL/min (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID19.82
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID19.61
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID15.81

Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Change in pre-dose FEV1 from baseline to the average of the randomized treatment period, as calculated by averaging treatment period FEV1 values and subtracting the pre-dose value. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionLiters (L) (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID0.07
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID0.07
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID0.04

Rate of Exacerbations Per Subject-year

Rate of exacerbations per subject-year (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionRate (Number)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID0.639
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID0.745
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID1.029

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score

Change from baseline in the SGRQ overall score, as calculated by averaging treatment period SGRQ scores and subtracting the baseline SGRQ scores. The SGRQ contains 3 domains: Symptoms (distress due to respiratory symptoms, 8 questions), Activity (disturbance of physical activity, 16 questions), and Impacts (overall impact on daily life and well-being, 26 questions). Lower scores are associated with less severe symptoms. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID-6.23
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID-5.00
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID-5.71

Total Number of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Per Patient-treatment Year

Number of COPD-related exacerbations per patient-treatment year. COPD-related exacerbation was defined as worsening COPD that required a course of oral steriods for treatment and/or hospitalization. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionExacerbations (Number)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID0.75
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID0.84
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID1.14

Use of Rescue Medication

Change from baseline in the use of beta-2 agonists, as calculated by averaging treatment period inhalations per day and subtracting the baseline number of inhalations per day. (NCT00419744)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionNumber of inhalations (Mean)
SYM 160/4.5 X 2 BID-1.21
SYM 80/4.5 X 2 BID-1.03
FOR 4.5 X 2 BID-0.28

Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

"Average Change in Asthma Control Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).~The ACQ has six questions regarding symptoms, rescue short-acting β-agonist use and one about FEV1 % predicted. A 7-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment) is used for each question and the ACQ score is the mean value of these questions - hence between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled)." (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tiotropium-0.70
Salmeterol or Formoterol-0.66

Change in Asthma Quality of Life (AQLQ)

"Average Change in Asthma Quality of Life Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ).~The AQLQ has 32 questions in four domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function, and environmental stimuli) and measures the functional problems that are troublesome to individuals with asthma. Symptoms (11 items), Activity Limitation (12 items, 5 of which are individualized), Emotional Function (5 items), and Environmental Exposure (4 items); 7-point Likert scale (7 = not impaired at all - 1 = severely impaired); scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life." (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tiotropium1.00
Salmeterol or Formoterol1.02

Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)

"Average Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI).~The ASUI is an 11-item preference-based outcome measure used in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies for asthma and is designed to assess the frequency and severity of cough, wheeze, dyspnea, nighttime awakenings, and side effects, weighted according to patient preferences.~4-point Likert scale to assess frequency (not at all, 1 to 3 days, 4 to 7 days, and 8 to 14 days) and severity (not applicable, mild, moderate and severe); scores range from 0 (worst possible symptoms) to 1 (no symptoms)." (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tiotropium0.11
Salmeterol or Formoterol0.10

Change in FEV1

Average change in lung function (FEV1) evaluated by spirometry per participant over 12 months (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 months

Interventionliters (Mean)
Tiotropium-0.018
Salmeterol or Formoterol0.003

Change in Rescue Medication Use

Average Change in Rescue Medication Use Per Participant Over 12 Months. Monthly questionnaires will evaluate the amount of rescue medication subjects have used on average, measured in puffs per day. (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tiotropium-0.92
Salmeterol or Formoterol-0.97

Time to Asthma Exacerbation (Mean Number of Exacerbations/Person-year)

We summarize the survival experience using mean number of exacerbations/person-year and compare it using the log-rank test comparing kaplan-meier survival curve. (NCT01290874)
Timeframe: evaluated monthly (on average) via questionnaire for 12 months

Interventionevent per person-year (Mean)
Tiotropium0.37
Salmeterol or Formoterol0.42

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.070
Treatment B0.118
Treatment C0.153
Treatment D0.147
Treatment E0.002
Treatment F0.213

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time on Day 1

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1.~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.067
Treatment B0.086
Treatment C0.135
Treatment D0.149
Treatment E0.009
Treatment F0.192

Number of Patients Achieving Onset of Action - Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1

Number of patients achieving onset of action was defined as a change from baseline in post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1. These are the patients who contributed to the results, reported as median and 95% CI for 'time to onset of action' presented in Outcome Measure 8, above. (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment A90
Treatment B103
Treatment C103
Treatment D110
Treatment E74
Treatment F113

Time to Onset of Action (Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) on Day 1

Time to onset of action is defined as the time (in minutes) from receiving the study drug on Day 1, until the FEV1 change from baseline is ≥100 mL. (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Treatment A45.1
Treatment B32.6
Treatment C29.5
Treatment D27.3
Treatment E240.1
Treatment F28.1

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT Interval (QTcF)

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF).~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post doseQTcF, Day 1, 55 min post doseQTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseQTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A3.628.377.151.612.384.13
Treatment B5.375.418.651.140.090.85
Treatment C6.816.727.20-0.601.41-0.97
Treatment D6.259.905.451.674.151.73
Treatment E3.596.044.81-3.561.020.14
Treatment F5.565.436.771.413.192.50

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate (HR)

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Heart rate (HR)~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5m, +55m, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
HR, Day 1, 5 min post doseHR, Day 1, 55 min post doseHR, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseHR, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A-8.85-7.19-7.57-1.72-1.52-2.30
Treatment B-6.62-8.29-6.75-1.060.41-0.01
Treatment C-7.78-8.28-9.20-1.61-1.10-1.13
Treatment D-7.64-9.59-7.46-1.85-1.40-0.73
Treatment E-4.84-7.44-6.123.921.122.49
Treatment F-5.54-7.19-8.961.701.22-1.47

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - PR Interval~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
PR Interval, Day 1, 5 min post dosePR Interval, Day 1, 55 min post dosePR Interval, Day 1, 2.5 h post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dosePR Interval, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A7.247.208.480.440.882.50
Treatment B6.536.899.381.362.373.01
Treatment C6.088.217.58-0.111.910.16
Treatment D6.716.776.163.880.820.84
Treatment E3.064.385.84-1.36-1.13-1.22
Treatment F4.904.774.250.82-1.66-1.94

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Interval

"Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - QRS Interval~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
QRS Interval, Day 1, 5 min post doseQRS Interval, Day 1, 55 min post doseQRS Interval, Day 1, 2.5 h post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 5 min post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 55 min post doseQRS Interval, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose
Treatment A1.180.971.380.611.121.49
Treatment B0.051.192.40-1.76-0.090.74
Treatment C1.501.211.800.430.850.30
Treatment D1.991.561.502.002.382.18
Treatment E0.450.140.640.450.771.14
Treatment F1.501.700.860.690.421.35

Change From Baseline in Average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) Total Score During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Change from baseline in average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) total score during inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period~E-RS in COPD uses 11 respiratory symptom items from the 14-item EXAcerbations of COPD tool (EXACT). E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity on a scale ranging from 0 to 40. Higher E-RS total scores indicate more severe symptoms and a declining total score indicates health improvement. E-RS questionnaire was completed by the patient each evening (e-diary).~Definitions:~For details on baseline, inter-visit periods, and the entire treatment period, please refer to outcome measure #15." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A-1.681-2.030-1.855
Treatment B-1.539-1.840-1.689
Treatment C-1.941-2.147-2.044
Treatment D-1.663-2.077-1.870
Treatment E-0.714-0.681-0.698
Treatment F-1.280-1.505-1.393

Change From Baseline in Average Use of Rescue Medication During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Evaluate the change from baseline in average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) during the inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period.~Results are shown as number of puffs/day; a decrease (implies improvement) from baseline in average use of rescue medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3 (Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0);" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
InterventionNumber of puffs/day (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A-0.72-0.59-0.66
Treatment B-0.58-0.50-0.54
Treatment C-0.53-0.51-0.52
Treatment D-0.71-0.69-0.70
Treatment E-0.30-0.17-0.23
Treatment F-0.52-0.40-0.46

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h), normalized by time on Day 1 of treatment (Week 0).~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 and at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-4h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1010.116
Treatment B0.1150.157
Treatment C0.1730.198
Treatment D0.1900.204
Treatment E0.0300.024
Treatment F0.1940.253

Change From Baseline in FEV1 Peak(0-4h) at Day 1 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at Week 6.~Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1970.212
Treatment B0.2110.255
Treatment C0.2600.305
Treatment D0.2880.301
Treatment E0.1360.143
Treatment F0.2990.356

Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-12h)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.0860.084
Treatment B0.1330.145
Treatment C0.1950.190
Treatment D0.2200.184
Treatment E0.011-0.029
Treatment F0.3050.298

Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).~Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-4)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4 h), normalized by time;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.1330.149
Treatment B0.1920.203
Treatment C0.2440.248
Treatment D0.2730.253
Treatment E0.0360.000
Treatment F0.3110.353

Change From Baseline in FVC Peak(0-4h) on Day 1 and at Week 6

"Change from baseline in FVC peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at the end of treatment at Week 6. Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Week 6
Treatment A0.2930.322
Treatment B0.3720.379
Treatment C0.4140.431
Treatment D0.4550.427
Treatment E0.2130.182
Treatment F0.4910.530

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period

"Evaluate the number of rescue medication-free days compared with baseline. Results are shown as percentage (%) of rescue medication-free days; an increased value indicates improvement from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0)." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period

,,,,,
Intervention% of of rescue medication-free days (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A16.7813.8315.30
Treatment B15.6715.5115.59
Treatment C15.5514.0314.79
Treatment D18.1918.1518.17
Treatment E8.907.077.98
Treatment F13.5111.2712.39

Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 3 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in FEV1 at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6) of treatment. Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A0.0590.020
Treatment B0.0800.088
Treatment C0.1220.107
Treatment D0.1110.130
Treatment E0.000-0.012
Treatment F0.1220.112

Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 3 and Week 6

"Change from baseline in IC at treatment Visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment Visit 4 (Week 6). Spirometry was used to measure IC and was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline: value of the measurement recorded at 45 mins pre-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0); IC=Inspiratory capacity;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A0.1560.045
Treatment B0.1370.090
Treatment C0.1060.136
Treatment D0.1400.105
Treatment E0.0470.025
Treatment F0.0900.099

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 3 and Week 6

"Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6).~TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), with a total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.~Definitions:~Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 3Week 6
Treatment A1.291.65
Treatment B1.552.02
Treatment C1.542.05
Treatment D1.942.55
Treatment E1.141.03
Treatment F1.662.11

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Response (Focal Score ≥1) at Week 3 and Week 6

"Number of subjects achieving TDI focal score ≥1, at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and at treatment visit 4 (Week 6).~TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement); total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.~Definitions:~Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 3 Focal Score ≥ 1Week 6 Focal Score ≥ 1
Treatment A7074
Treatment B7883
Treatment C7582
Treatment D8491
Treatment E6755
Treatment F7480

Vital Signs -- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

"Vital signs -- Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at prespecified times, using a 12-Lead single ECGs were recorded at all study visits (pre-dose at V1 (Week -2) and V3 (Week 3), as well as at pre-dose and 1.5 hours post-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Visit 4 (Week 6).~Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmHg) for representative timepoints.~Definitions:~Baseline=Values recorded pre-dose (Visit 2, Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug (Visit 2, Week 0);" (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBP, Day 1, 30 min post doseDBP, Day 1, 30 min post doseSBP, Day 1, 1,5 h post doseDBP, Day 1, 1,5 h post doseSBP, Day 1, 11 h post doseDBP, Day 1, 11 h post doseSBP, Week 6, pre-doseDBP, Week 6, pre-doseSBP, Week 6, 30 min post doseDBP, Week 6, 30 min post doseSBP, Week 6, 1,5 h post doseDBP, Week 6, 1,5 h post doseSBP, Week 6, 11 h post doseDBP, Week 6, 11 h post dose
Treatment A-1.4-0.70.3-0.71.1-0.90.40.4-1.6-0.7-1.3-1.00.2-0.9
Treatment B-0.4-0.6-1.1-1.82.00.30.80.5-0.9-0.9-0.6-2.71.5-2.0
Treatment C-2.0-2.1-0.6-1.7-0.0-1.60.4-0.3-0.5-1.5-0.5-2.00.5-2.3
Treatment D-1.9-1.4-1.8-1.61.7-1.4-1.0-1.0-2.5-2.0-2.3-2.32.2-1.4
Treatment E-0.9-0.80.2-1.71.9-1.01.60.00.5-0.80.1-1.13.2-1.0
Treatment F-1.20.1-1.5-1.50.9-1.21.3-0.20.1-1.20.5-0.62.0-0.7

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change From Baseline

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change from baseline.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.~Results are presented as the number of subjects who had a change from baseline in QTcF of: > 30 msec, > 60 msec, and no prolongation (by > 30 msec or > 60 msec)." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795
Change from baseline: > 60 msecNo change from baseline (> 30 msec or > 60 msec)Change from baseline: > 30 msec
Treatment A19
Treatment B20
Treatment C21
Treatment D20
Treatment E16
Treatment F18
Treatment A0
Treatment B1
Treatment C0
Treatment D2
Treatment E2
Treatment F1
Treatment A102
Treatment B102
Treatment C100
Treatment D101
Treatment E103
Treatment F104
Treatment A2
Treatment B4
Treatment C9
Treatment E3
Treatment F4
Treatment D0
Treatment E0
Treatment A119
Treatment B119
Treatment C112
Treatment D121
Treatment E118
Treatment F119
Treatment A8
Treatment C5
Treatment D6
Treatment E4
Treatment F5
Treatment A113
Treatment C116
Treatment D116
Treatment E116
Treatment F118
Treatment A5
Treatment B12
Treatment C6
Treatment D5
Treatment E6
Treatment F8
Treatment B0
Treatment D1
Treatment E1
Treatment F0
Treatment A116
Treatment B111
Treatment C115
Treatment D117
Treatment E114
Treatment F115
Treatment B3
Treatment D3
Treatment F3
Treatment C121
Treatment D120
Treatment E121
Treatment F120
Treatment C7
Treatment D7
Treatment B123
Treatment C114
Treatment A6
Treatment B6
Treatment C3
Treatment F7
Treatment A115
Treatment B117
Treatment C118
Treatment F116

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female Subjects

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female subjects.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488794QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488797QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488795QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488793QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797
Actual value > 470 msecActual value > 500 msecNo prolongation (> 470 msec or > 500 msec)
Treatment B64
Treatment C67
Treatment E0
Treatment A3
Treatment F1
Treatment A55
Treatment F0
Treatment F57
Treatment A2
Treatment B3
Treatment A56
Treatment B65
Treatment C0
Treatment F56
Treatment A1
Treatment A57
Treatment B2
Treatment A0
Treatment B0
Treatment D0
Treatment A58
Treatment B66
Treatment D65
Treatment E52
Treatment B1
Treatment D1
Treatment B67
Treatment D64

24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male Subjects

"24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male subjects.~Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h." (NCT03084796)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 5 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488793QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488794QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488795QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488798QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488797QTcF, Day -1, 55 min72488796QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488794QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488797QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488798QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488793QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488795QTcF, Day -1, 2.5 h72488796QTcF, Any post dose time point72488793QTcF, Any post dose time point72488794QTcF, Any post dose time point72488797QTcF, Any post dose time point72488798QTcF, Any post dose time point72488795QTcF, Any post dose time point72488796QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day 1, 2.5 h post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 5 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488796QTcF, Day before Week 6, 55 min post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488793QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488794QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488797QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488798QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488795QTcF, Day before Week 6, 2.5 h post dose72488796
Actual value > 450 msecActual value > 480 msecActual value > 500 msecNo prolongation (> 450 msec or > 480 msec or > 500
Treatment F1
Treatment B55
Treatment C54
Treatment F65
Treatment C1
Treatment A62
Treatment C53
Treatment E68
Treatment F63
Treatment B1
Treatment E1
Treatment B54
Treatment E66
Treatment F66
Treatment B4
Treatment C6
Treatment D4
Treatment E2
Treatment F5
Treatment E0
Treatment F3
Treatment B0
Treatment F0
Treatment B51
Treatment C47
Treatment D54
Treatment E67
Treatment F58
Treatment B2
Treatment C0
Treatment C51
Treatment F61
Treatment C3
Treatment A1
Treatment B53
Treatment C50
Treatment A3
Treatment B3
Treatment F4
Treatment A59
Treatment B52
Treatment F62
Treatment D3
Treatment F2
Treatment A0
Treatment A60
Treatment D55
Treatment A2
Treatment C2
Treatment D2
Treatment D0
Treatment A61
Treatment C52
Treatment D56
Treatment E69
Treatment D1
Treatment D57

12-lead ECG Parameters - Heart Rate - Change From Baseline

"12-lead electrocardiogram (12-lead ECG) parameter - heart rate (HR) was measured at baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.~Change from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0) pre-dose;~bpm=Beats per minute;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)0.6
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)0.2
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.4
Treatment D (Placebo)1.2
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)-0.4

24-hr Creatinine - Change From Baseline.

"24-hr Creatinine - Change From Baseline.~For the evaluation of the 24-hr creatinine excretion, 24-hour urine sample were collected. Creatinine was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0) pre-dose;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionumol/mol (Median)
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)0.00
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)0.00
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.00
Treatment D (Placebo)0.00
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)0.00

24-hr Urine Free Cortisol - Change From Baseline

"24-hr Urinary Free Cortisol - Change From Baseline.~For the evaluation of the 24-hr Urine-Free cortisol excretion, 24-hour urine samples were collected. Urine-free cortisol was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0) pre-dose;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionnmol/day (Median)
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-3.60
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)-5.35
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-4.10
Treatment D (Placebo)1.40
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)-3.50

Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 4 - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 at Week 4.~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values for pre-dose FEV1 were the average of measurements taken at V2 (Week 0) at 45 minutes and 15 minutes pre-dose; FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)0.021
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)0.120
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.073
Treatment D (Placebo)0.003
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)0.077

Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 8 - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 (average of pre-dose FEV1 measurements) at Week 8.~Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values for pre-dose FEV1 were the average of measurements taken at V2 (Week 0) at 45 minutes and 15 minutes pre-dose; FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)0.021
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)0.090
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.070
Treatment D (Placebo)-0.023
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)0.078

12-lead ECG Parameters - PR, QRS, QTcF - Change From Baseline.

"12-lead electrocardiogram (12-lead ECG) parameters - PR, QRS, QTcF intervals - were measured at baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.~Changes from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0); QTcF=Fridericia-corrected QT interval; msec=Millisecond;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
PRQRSQTcF
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-2.60.11.6
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)1.5-1.30.7
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-1.90.90.7
Treatment D (Placebo)-1.3-0.54.6
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)1.0-0.31.2

12-lead ECG Parameters - Prolonged QTcF - Change From Baseline

"Number of participants with prolonged QTcF. Change from baseline.~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0) pre-dose; QTcF=Fridericia-corrected QT interval;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcF > 30 msecQTcF > 60 msec
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)61
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)41
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)40
Treatment D (Placebo)92
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)31

Asthma Control Questionnaire-7© (ACQ-7) Score at Week 4 and Week 8 - Change From Baseline

"The ACQ consists of 7 items: 6 simple self-administered questions referring to asthma control and rescue treatment usage with 1 week recall, and a 7th item consisting of the percent (%) predicted FEV1 completed by clinic staff. Scoring uses a 7-point scale: 0 = totally controlled and 6 = severely uncontrolled. The ACQ score was calculated as the average of all 7 items.~Definitions:~ACQ-7 score=Asthma Control Questionnaire-7©; Information regarding the American Thoracic Society ACQ questionnaire is also available at: https://member.thoracic.org/members/assemblies/assemblies/srn/questionaires/acq.php; Baseline ACQ-7 score = ACQ score recorded at V2 (Week 0) Day 1, before randomization; FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-0.43-0.53
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)-0.53-0.58
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-0.49-0.66
Treatment D (Placebo)-0.27-0.43
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)-0.47-0.64

Average Use of Rescue Medication - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in average use of rescue medication, during Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period.~Definitions:~Baseline=For the efficacy variable -- average use of rescue medication -- derived from the electronic diary (eDiary), baseline values were the averages recorded during the run-in period;~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
Interventionpuffs/day (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-0.11-0.12-0.11
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)-0.27-0.35-0.31
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-0.14-0.25-0.20
Treatment D (Placebo)0.070.010.04
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)-0.13-0.18-0.15

Overall Daily Asthma Symptoms Scores - Change From Baseline

"Overall daily asthma symptoms scores - Change From Baseline (am and pm).~Subjects had to record asthma symptom score (overall symptoms, cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) in the am (night-time asthma symptom score) and in the pm (daytime asthma symptom score). These data were collected in the subject's diary. Daily asthma symptoms score were performed separately for am score and pm score and also as a total, where the total equals the sum of the am and pm scores. Degree of asthma symptoms by score: 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe.~Baseline=Averages values during the run-in period;~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-0.1-0.1-0.1
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)-0.1-0.1-0.1
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-0.1-0.1-0.1
Treatment D (Placebo)0.0-0.00.0
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)-0.1-0.1-0.1

Percentage (%) of Asthma Control Days - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in percentage (%) of asthma control days, during Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period.~This outcome measure was calculated according to the following definition: Days with a total daily morning + evening asthma score = 0 AND No rescue medication use.~Definitions:~Baseline=For the efficacy variable -- asthma control days -- derived from the eDiary, baseline values were the averages/percentages recorded during the run-in period;~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
Intervention% of asthma control days (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)7.314.310.8
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)10.616.313.4
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)10.417.513.9
Treatment D (Placebo)5.010.57.7
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)12.820.6316.7

Percentage (%) of Asthma Symptoms-free Days - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in Percentage (%) of asthma symptoms-free days.~Asthma symptoms-free days is the number of days with a total asthma score=0 (daily morning plus evening asthma score).~Subjects recorded asthma symptom score as described in the Outcome measure #7.~Definitions:~Baseline=For the efficacy variables -- daytime and night-time asthma symptom scores -- derived from the eDiary, baseline values were the averages/percentages recorded during the run-in period;~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
Intervention% of of asthma symptom-free days (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)8.616.412.5
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)10.517.013.8
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)10.117.213.6
Treatment D (Placebo)5.711.78.7
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)12.821.217.0

Percentage (%) of Rescue Medication-free Days - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in percentage (%) of rescue medication-free days. An increased value indicates improvement from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=For the efficacy variable -- percentage (%) of rescue medication-free days -- derived from the electronic diary (eDiary), baseline values were the averages/percentages recorded during the run-in period.~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
Intervention% of rescue medication-free days (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)5.98.97.4
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)9.013.111.1
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)6.110.08.1
Treatment D (Placebo)1.54.12.8
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)7.711.29.5

Pre-dose Morning FVC at Week 4 and 8 - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in pre-dose morning FVC at Week 4 and 8.~Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values for pre-dose FVC were the average of measurements taken at V2 (Week 0) at 45 minutes and 15 minutes pre-dose; FVC=Forced vital capacity;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)0.0360.014
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)0.0990.089
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.0660.036
Treatment D (Placebo)0.023-0.016
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)0.0560.063

Pre-dose Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) (Morning and Evening) - Change From Baseline

"Change from baseline in pre-dose Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (Liters/min), morning and evening measurements.~Definitions:~Baseline=For the efficacy variable -- morning and evening PEF -- derived from the eDiary, the baseline values were the averages/percentages recorded during the run-in period; PEF=evening peak expiratory flow;~Inter-visit period 1=Starts from the pm assessment of the Start of the Randomized Treatment Period to the am assessment at Visit 3 (Week 4);~Inter-visit Period 2=Starts from the pm assessment of the day the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3) to the am assessment of the date of Visit 4 (Week 8);~Entire treatment period=Average of 8 weeks;~am=morning pm=evening" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline (average of the 2-week run-in period); Inter-visit period 1 (average of the first 4 weeks); Inter-visit period 2 (average of the last 4 weeks); Entire treatment period (average of 8 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionLiters/min (Least Squares Mean)
Inter-visit period 1Inter-visit period 2Entire treatment period
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-2-4-3
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)-330.3
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)-4-5-4
Treatment D (Placebo)-6-4-4.9
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)021

Vital Signs (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure) - Change From Baseline

"Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) at baseline, week 4, and week 8.~Change from baseline.~Definitions:~Baseline=Baseline values were defined at visit 2 (Week 0) pre-dose; DBP=Diastolic blood pressure; SBP=Systolic blood pressure;" (NCT03084718)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBP, Week 4SBP, Week 8DBP, Week 4DBP, Week 8
Treatment A (CHF 718 pMDI 100 µg TDD)-0.41.0-0.10.8
Treatment B (CHF 718 pMDI 400 µg TDD)1.02.50.21.0
Treatment C (CHF 718 pMDI 800 µg TDD)0.50.8-0.80.3
Treatment D (Placebo)0.60.20.1-0.5
Treatment E (QVAR^®, 320 µg TDD)0.0-0.90.81.2

FEV1 Area Under the Curve Between 0 and 12 h [AUC(0-12h)], Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"Spirometry used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Results show the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time on Day 14; it was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Definitions:~AUC=Area under the curve; AUC(0-12h)=AUC between 0 and 12 h; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period; FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.174
Treatment B0.221
Treatment C0.197
Treatment D0.231
Treatment E0.064
Treatment F0.208

FEV1 AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1

"Spirometry used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.181
Treatment B0.221
Treatment C0.260
Treatment D0.282
Treatment E0.067
Treatment F0.239

Patients Achieving Onset of Action -- Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥12% and ≥200 mL to Post Dose Day 1

"Patients achieving onset of action, defined as a change from baseline in post-dose FEV1 ≥12% and ≥200 mL, on Day 1. These are the subjects who contributed to the results, reported as median and 95% CI for 'Time to onset of action' presented in the Outcome Measure 13, above.~For patients receiving the same treatment twice, the analysis includes only data from the first instance of each treatment.~Definitions:~Onset of action=Change from baseline in post-dose FEV1 ≥12% and ≥200 mL; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose);" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 post-dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment A23
Treatment B22
Treatment C30
Treatment D29
Treatment E11
Treatment F31

Pre-dose Morning FEV1 (L) -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.071
Treatment B0.102
Treatment C0.073
Treatment D0.149
Treatment E0.037
Treatment F0.126

Pre-dose Morning FVC -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.048
Treatment B0.044
Treatment C0.048
Treatment D0.114
Treatment E0.053
Treatment F0.114

Sensitivity Analysis 1: FEV1 AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"The primary analysis was repeated, considering patients as randomized and including only the first instance of each treatment.~Patients receiving the same treatment in more than one period were included in the analysis with only data from the first instance of each treatment." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.169
Treatment B0.224
Treatment C0.196
Treatment D0.232
Treatment E0.058
Treatment F0.206

Sensitivity Analysis 2: FEV1 AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"The primary analysis was repeated, considering only patients and treatment periods for which treatment was assigned on or after the randomization error occurred.~The number of patients shown represents those with at least one post-baseline assessment available." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.129
Treatment B0.180
Treatment C0.159
Treatment D0.179
Treatment E-0.006
Treatment F0.170

Sensitivity Analysis 3: FEV1 AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 14

"Patients receiving the same treatment during two treatment periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Patients considered in this analysis are those with at least one available post-baseline assessment." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment A0.144
Treatment B0.194
Treatment C0.170
Treatment D0.198
Treatment E0.037
Treatment F0.184

Time to Onset of Action -- Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥12% and ≥200 mL to Post Dose Day 1

"Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~For patients receiving the same treatment twice, the analysis includes only data from the first instance of each treatment.~Definitions:~Time to onset of action=The time (in minutes) from receiving the study drug on Day 1, until the FEV1 change from baseline is ≥200 mL; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 post-dose

Interventionminutes (Median)
Treatment A358.8
Treatment B60.3
Treatment C33.6
Treatment D44.3
Treatment ENA
Treatment F45.5

12-lead ECG Parameter -- Heart Rate (HR) -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in bpm).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Day 1, 30 min post-doseDay 1, 1h post-doseDay 1, 4h post-doseDay 1, 8h post-doseDay 1, 12h post-doseDay 14, pre-doseDay 14, 30 min post-doseDay 14, 1h post-doseDay 14, 4h post-doseDay 14, 8h post-doseDay 14, 12h post-dose
Treatment A0.3-1.32.15.05.12.52.91.92.85.57.4
Treatment B1.20.31.52.45.50.1-0.8-1.22.33.57.5
Treatment C1.72.73.35.05.53.11.61.66.74.96.7
Treatment D2.51.55.33.97.62.04.33.23.43.85.4
Treatment E-2.4-1.80.20.52.40.7-1.5-1.21.81.60.5
Treatment F-0.3-1.23.22.15.20.41.30.42.32.65.1

12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter (PR Interval) -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were monitored during the study. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in msec).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Day 1, 30 min post-doseDay 1, 1h post-doseDay 1, 4h post-doseDay 1, 8h post-doseDay 1, 12h post-doseDay 14, pre-doseDay 14, 30 min post-doseDay 14, 1h post-doseDay 14, 4h post-doseDay 14, 8h post-doseDay 14, 12h post-dose
Treatment A-0.11.1-1.2-1.9-3.41.3-0.21.0-1.5-2.6-5.0
Treatment B1.62.21.6-0.5-2.33.74.55.72.51.51.7
Treatment C-1.3-1.1-1.5-3.0-3.8-1.7-1.50.1-2.5-3.2-4.8
Treatment D-3.6-0.7-4.0-2.6-3.0-2.9-3.1-1.6-3.2-5.4-1.4
Treatment E1.00.4-1.6-2.4-2.60.13.45.20.8-1.10.1
Treatment F3.22.01.9-0.0-1.72.25.16.11.30.8-0.3

12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter (QRS Interval) -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were monitored during the study. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in msec).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Day 1, 30 min post-doseDay 1, 1h post-doseDay 1, 4h post-doseDay 1, 8h post-doseDay 1, 12h post-doseDay 14, pre-doseDay 14, 30 min post-doseDay 14, 1h post-doseDay 14, 4h post-doseDay 14, 8h post-doseDay 14, 12h post-dose
Treatment A1.21.31.20.60.50.51.41.32.00.70.8
Treatment B1.21.02.10.91.01.01.60.91.81.20.4
Treatment C1.71.22.21.31.0-0.50.50.40.60.10.3
Treatment D1.11.62.10.50.91.72.42.32.81.41.4
Treatment E0.81.01.0-0.20.4-0.9-0.30.0-0.2-0.8-1.0
Treatment F1.31.41.10.50.80.81.71.01.10.90.5

12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter (QTcF Interval) -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were monitored during the study. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in msec).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Day 1, 30 min post-doseDay 1, 1h post-doseDay 1, 4h post-doseDay 1, 8h post-doseDay 1, 12h post-doseDay 14, pre-doseDay 14, 30 min post-doseDay 14, 1h post-doseDay 14, 4h post-doseDay 14, 8h post-doseDay 14, 12h post-dose
Treatment A3.92.12.52.42.01.54.44.03.83.43.7
Treatment B3.81.41.51.10.9-0.41.01.00.91.71.7
Treatment C2.73.90.80.6-0.31.63.51.91.11.7-0.9
Treatment D4.94.22.40.81.15.810.47.75.02.23.7
Treatment E-0.20.4-2.4-0.2-1.5-2.31.90.9-1.11.5-0.6
Treatment F1.4-0.9-1.3-2.4-2.21.21.70.6-1.10.4-1.6

FEV1 AUC(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Spirometry used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.2200.214
Treatment B0.2500.251
Treatment C0.2700.231
Treatment D0.3170.278
Treatment E0.0470.061
Treatment F0.2880.259

FEV1 Peak(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.3590.346
Treatment B0.3700.373
Treatment C0.3930.349
Treatment D0.4300.389
Treatment E0.1780.183
Treatment F0.4160.367

FVC AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.1110.103
Treatment B0.1560.134
Treatment C0.1600.120
Treatment D0.1820.142
Treatment E0.0590.060
Treatment F0.1720.134

FVC AUC(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.1580.135
Treatment B0.1860.146
Treatment C0.1590.136
Treatment D0.2150.194
Treatment E0.0360.050
Treatment F0.2130.177

FVC Peak(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.~Patients receiving the same treatment during two periods are considered twice in the ANCOVA model (once for each period attended).~Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose) on Day 1 of the treatment period;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.3310.310
Treatment B0.3470.331
Treatment C0.3540.304
Treatment D0.3670.350
Treatment E0.2160.198
Treatment F0.3850.340

Heart Rate (HR) AUC(0-4h) and Peak(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Pre-dose to Post Dose Day 14

"Heart rate (HR) AUC(0-4h) and HR peak(0-4h), normalized by time (in bpm).~Results are shown as change from pre-dose on Day 14 (in bpm).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~Definitions:~HR=Heart rate; HR AUC(0-4h)=Area under the curve between 0 and 4 h for heart rate; HR peak(0-4h)=The maximum observed value over 4 h after dosing;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
HR AUC(0-4h)HR peak(0-4h)
Treatment A-0.43.5
Treatment B0.55.1
Treatment C0.45.1
Treatment D1.35.3
Treatment E-0.24.3
Treatment F0.94.8

Heart Rate (HR) AUC(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Heart rate HR AUC(0-4h) normalized by time. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in bpm).~The HR AUC(0-4h) normalized by time is calculated based on the actual times, using the linear trapezoidal rule.~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A0.22.3
Treatment B0.80.2
Treatment C2.73.5
Treatment D3.03.3
Treatment E-1.0-0.1
Treatment F0.31.2

Heart Rate (HR) Peak(0-4h), Normalized by Time -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Heart rate (HR) peak(0-4h) normalized by time.~Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in bpm).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period.~Definitions:~HR=Heart rate; HR peak(0-4h)=The maximum observed value over 4 hours following dosing;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Treatment A4.76.1
Treatment B4.44.8
Treatment C6.58.3
Treatment D7.57.3
Treatment E2.94.4
Treatment F5.15.2

Serum Glucose -- Change From Baseline to Post-dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Serum glucose level was monitored during the study. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmol/L).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Day 1; 1.5h post-doseDay 1; 3h post-doseDay 1; 5h post-doseDay 1; 7h post-doseDay 1; 11h post-doseDay 14; pre-doseDay 14; 1.5h post-doseDay 14; 3h post-doseDay 14; 5h post-doseDay 14; 7h post-doseDay 14; 11h post-dose
Treatment A0.490.450.830.810.98-0.340.090.090.04-0.040.39
Treatment B0.340.541.120.421.080.000.260.770.900.601.30
Treatment C0.571.101.111.241.890.490.971.311.120.731.50
Treatment D1.191.791.581.371.420.491.211.511.161.091.47
Treatment E0.470.260.510.841.400.370.350.250.320.251.03
Treatment F-0.060.390.440.610.90-0.03-0.030.160.530.180.68

Serum Potassium -- Change From Baseline Post-dose to Post Dose Day 1 and Day 14

"Serum potassium level was monitored during the study. Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmol/L).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~For safety variables, the baseline for each period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period." (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Day 1; 1.5h post-doseDay 1; 3h post-doseDay 1; 5h post-doseDay 1; 7h post-doseDay 1; 11h post-doseDay 14; pre-doseDay 14; 1.5h post-doseDay 14; 3h post-doseDay 14; 5h post-doseDay 14; 7h post-doseDay 14; 11h post-dose
Treatment A-0.01-0.06-0.14-0.020.070.06-0.02-0.04-0.020.050.11
Treatment B-0.05-0.08-0.03-0.000.02-0.02-0.03-0.09-0.050.060.05
Treatment C-0.08-0.23-0.12-0.05-0.080.08-0.10-0.13-0.010.090.03
Treatment D-0.17-0.28-0.19-0.16-0.10-0.14-0.23-0.24-0.26-0.19-0.06
Treatment E-0.060.03-0.040.040.010.05-0.03-0.000.000.020.01
Treatment F-0.18-0.21-0.20-0.14-0.13-0.13-0.15-0.15-0.15-0.09-0.02

Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure [SBP] and Diastolic Blood Pressure [DBP]) -- Change From Baseline for Post-dose on Day 1 and on Day 14

"Vital signs -- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at pre-specified times (at baseline - pre dose and on Day 14 of each treatment period or on the day of early study termination).~Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmHg).~For patients receiving the same treatment in 2 periods, the average of the 2 available data points was considered in the calculation.~Definitions:~For safety variables, the baseline for each treatment period was defined as pre-dose measurements on Day 1 of each treatment period; Day 14=The day of the last dosing of a treatment period. Day 14 of the second, third, and fourth treatment periods (day of last dosing); treatments were separated by a 2-week wash-out interval;" (NCT03086460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 and Day 14 post-dose

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBP, Day 1, 30 min post-doseSBP, Day 1, 1 h post-doseSBP, Day 1, 4 h post-doseSBP, Day 1, 8 h post-doseSBP, Day 1, 12 h post-doseSBP, Day 14, pre-doseSBP, Day 14, 30 min post-doseSBP, Day 14, 1 h post-doseSBP, Day 14, 4 h post-doseSBP, Day 14, 8 h post-doseSBP, Day 14, 12 h post-doseDBP, Day 1, 30 min post-doseDBP, Day 1, 1 h post-doseDBP, Day 1, 4 h post-doseDBP, Day 1, 8 h post-doseDBP, Day 1, 12 h post-doseDBP, Day 14, pre-doseDBP, Day 14, 30 min post-doseDBP, Day 14, 1 h post-doseDBP, Day 14, 4 h post-doseDBP, Day 14, 8 h post-doseDBP, Day 14, 12 h post-dose
Treatment A-1.2-0.11.70.81.81.00.30.10.90.71.2-2.10.0-0.6-1.5-0.5-1.2-0.2-0.3-1.0-1.10.0
Treatment B0.20.50.40.22.1-1.8-3.1-1.80.11.31.0-1.5-1.9-1.4-0.9-0.10.1-2.1-2.4-1.5-1.0-0.7
Treatment C-0.8-0.6-0.91.13.00.0-0.7-1.8-1.41.11.5-1.2-0.4-0.4-0.40.41.1-0.8-0.5-1.70.30.7
Treatment D-1.2-0.60.90.71.4-0.4-0.7-1.91.00.64.4-2.0-1.6-1.0-1.9-1.0-0.1-2.9-2.4-2.5-2.6-0.6
Treatment E-0.5-0.80.20.5-0.1-2.5-3.6-1.7-0.5-3.3-0.3-0.3-2.5-1.6-1.7-0.3-0.6-1.5-1.80.4-1.71.4
Treatment F-0.8-0.80.52.53.4-0.3-2.5-1.1-0.80.62.5-1.2-1.7-1.00.40.0-0.7-2.0-1.6-2.3-1.3-0.1

Total Number of Healthcare Visits

Determine differences in healthcare visits which include all-cause and respiratory related, acute care outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations between groups (NCT03137303)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Emergency room visit72551318Emergency room visit72551317Hospitalization72551317Hospitalization72551318Acute outpatient visit72551318Acute outpatient visit72551317Routine primary care visits72551317Routine primary care visits72551318New diagnostic tests72551318New diagnostic tests72551317
NoMissingYes
Patient Subject Usual Care111
Patient-Subject Intervention76
Patient Subject Usual Care119
Patient-Subject Intervention93
Patient Subject Usual Care1
Patient Subject Usual Care48
Patient-Subject Intervention17
Patient Subject Usual Care182
Patient-Subject Intervention152
Patient Subject Usual Care61
Patient-Subject Intervention35
Patient Subject Usual Care169
Patient-Subject Intervention134
Patient Subject Usual Care198
Patient-Subject Intervention138
Patient Subject Usual Care32
Patient-Subject Intervention31
Patient-Subject Intervention2
Patient Subject Usual Care126
Patient-Subject Intervention72
Patient Subject Usual Care104
Patient-Subject Intervention97

Mean mMRC Dyspnea Scale Scores for Participants With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The 5-point mMRC Dyspnea Scale measures the level of dyspnea (trouble breathing) experienced by participants. Scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%1.9
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%1.6

Mean Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale Scores for Participants With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The 5-point mMRC Dyspnea Scale measures the level of dyspnea (trouble breathing) experienced by participants. Scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%1.7
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%1.6

Mean Number of Puffs From All Short-acting Bronchodilators Used in the Past Two Weeks in Participants With an FEV1 of <50% and >=50%

The average number of puffs from all short-acting bronchodilators used in the past 2 weeks was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpuffs (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%5.2
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%2.8

Mean Puffs From All Short-acting Bronchodilators Used in the Past Two Weeks in Participants With an FEV1 of <80% and >=80%

The average number of puffs from all short-acting bronchodilators used in the past 2 weeks was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionpuffs (Mean)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%3.8
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%2.3

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The number of participants who had a COPD exacerbation (defined as worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring hospitalization was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%16
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%32

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The number of participants who had a COPD exacerbation (defined as worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring hospitalization was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%41
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%7

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Oral Corticosteroids and/or Antibiotics With Post-albuterol FEV1 <50% and >=50%

The number of participants with a COPD exacerbation (worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%79
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%284

Number of Participants Who Had a COPD Exacerbation Requiring Oral Corticosteroids and/or Antibiotics With Post-albuterol FEV1 <80% and >=80%

The number of participants with a COPD exacerbation (worsening of COPD symptoms) requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was calculated. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%246
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%117

Number of Participants With Reports of Diagnosis and/or Treatment for Specific Cardiovascular (Heart), Psychiatric (Anxiety or Depression), and/or Bone Disorders in the <80%, >=80%, <50%, and >=50% FEV1 Groups

The number of participants with the indicated affected medical conditions were counted. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypertensionCoronary artery diseaseEdemaAtherosclerosisArrhythmiaHeart failureStable anginaPeripheral vascular diseaseValvular heart diseasePulmonary edemaIschemic heart disease without cardiomyopathyCardiomyopathyIschemic heart disease with cardiomyopathyCardiomegalyLeft ventricular dysfunctionDiastolic dysfunctionCerebrovascular diseaseLeft ventricular hypertrophyStrokeCardiac arrestMyocardial infarctionTransient ischemic attackUnstable anginaGeneralized anxiety disorderMajor depressive disorder, recurrent episodeSocial anxiety disorder (social phobia)Panic disorderMajor depressive disorder, single episodePost-traumatic stress disorderAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorderOsteoporosisOsteopenia
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <50%12326232016101366654531122001003730774442911
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 <80%3898769504026252218111081185554121021131072424171499232
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=50%4008555414023192519977667633431221141223429191898931
Participants With Diagnosed COPD and Post-albuterol FEV1 >=80%1342491116779742301320131120384517126842610

Number of Participants With the Categorized Post-albuterol Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) Ratios

The ratio is calculated as the amount of air expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration (FEV1) divided by the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after a full inspiration (FVC). (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
<=0.70>0.70
Participants With Diagnosed COPD689383

Percentage of Participants Whose Post-albuterol FEV1 Was <50% Predicted Normal

The percentage of participants on long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) monotherapy who met spirometric criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and who had a post-albuterol FEV1 (the amount of air expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration) <50% predicted normal was calculated. Predicted normal values for FEV1 were calculated using the reference values from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Values are based on the participants' age, height, sex, and race; thus, normal values vary based on participants' demographics. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study; 15-30 min post-albuterol (self-administered)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<50% predicted normal>=50% predicted normal
Participants With Diagnosed COPD2377

Percentage of Participants Whose Post-albuterol Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Was <80% Predicted Normal

The percentage of participants on long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) monotherapy who had a post-albuterol FEV1) <80% predicted normal was calculated. FEV1 is the amount of air that can be expelled from the lungs in one second after a full inspiration. Predicted normal values for FEV1 were calculated using the reference values from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Values are based on the participants' age, height, sex, and race; thus, normal values vary based on participants' demographics. (NCT00791518)
Timeframe: Day 1 of a 1-day study; 15-30 min post-albuterol (self-administered)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<80% predicted normal>=80% predicted normal
Participants With Diagnosed COPD7030

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in Rescue Albuterol Puffs Per Day

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Rescue albuterol puffs were measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventioncount of the number of puffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.26
B: Daily ICS0.24
C: Rescue ICS0.26
D: Placebo0.18

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Days

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: An asthma control day was determined daily during each of the 44-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.

Interventionproportion of asthma control days (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS-0.006
B: Daily ICS-0.021
C: Rescue ICS-0.064
D: Placebo-0.034

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)

The ACT consisted of five questions, each ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The five questions were summed to yield an overall score that ranged from 5 (worst) to 25 (best). (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: The ACT was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.17
B: Daily ICS-0.15
C: Rescue ICS-0.57
D: Placebo-0.76

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma-specific Quality of Life Assessment

The asthma-specific quality of life scale ranged from 1 (worst) to 7 (best) (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: The asthma-specific quality of life assessment was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.15
B: Daily ICS0.07
C: Rescue ICS0.05
D: Placebo-0.03

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Variability (PEFR)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Evening PEFR was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS16.2
B: Daily ICS14.9
C: Rescue ICS12.9
D: Placebo20.6

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Measured in Parts Per Billion

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: eNO was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionparts per billion (Least Squares Mean)
Daily ICS + Rescue ICS-0.08
Daily ICS0.07
Rescue ICS0.58
Placebo0.34

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Morning PEFR was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS17.7
B: Daily ICS16.3
C: Rescue ICS16.5
D: Placebo21.1

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV!)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.104
B: Daily ICS0.113
C: Rescue ICS0.097
D: Placebo0.063

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability

PEFR variability represents the relative change between the evening and morning PEFR measurements, so it could be a positive or negative number. It was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. Specifically, the PEFR variability on a specific day is defined as 100% x (evening PEFR - morning PEFR)/{0.5*(evening PEFR + morning PEFR)} (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: PEFR variability was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionrelative change (AM and PM peak flow) (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.836
B: Daily ICS-0.043
C: Rescue ICS0.098
D: Placebo0.894

Participants Experiencing an Asthma Exacerbation That Requires Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Measured during the 44-week treatment period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS22
B: Daily ICS20
C: Rescue ICS25
D: Placebo36

Bronchial Responsiveness to Serial Methacholine Concentrations Inhaled Into the Lungs

Bronchial responsiveness to serial concentrations of inhaled methacholine solution (mg/ml) as measured by serial ratios of follow-up to baseline FEV1 (forced volume of air expired from the lungs in one second). A dose-response curve is calculated from the serial ratios in relation to the serial concentrations to determine PC20, the concentration associated with a 20% drop from baseline in FEV1; this PC20 is the outcome measure with units mg/ml of methacholine. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventionmg/ml of methacholine (Geometric Mean)
1 Budesonide3.0
2 Nedocromil1.8
3 Placebo1.9

Change From Baseline in the Rate of Asthma Free Days

Change from baseline proportion of days without asthma symptoms or other asthma related events to proportion of days during the 4-6 years of follow-up. Asthma free days were determined from daily asthma diaries kept from baseline to the end of treatment, 4-6 years later. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventiondays per month (Mean)
1 Budesonide11.3
2 Nedocromil9.3
3 Placebo9.3

Change in Height From Baseline to End of Treatment, 4-6 Years Later

Change in standing height from baseline to end of treatment. Standing height is measured three times without shoes using a calibrated Harpenden stadiometer; the average of the three repeated heights to the nearest 0.1 cm is the height measure at either baseline or end of treatment. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventioncm (Mean)
1 Budesonide22.7
2 Nedocromil23.7
3 Placebo23.8

Mortality

Counts of deaths from asthma. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 Budesonide0
2 Nedocromil1
3 Placebo0

Need for Urgent Care for Asthma

Counts during the period of treatment (4-6 years) of visits to emergency rooms or equivalent urgent care settings for asthma treatment. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventionrate per 100 person years (Number)
1 Budesonide12
2 Nedocromil16
3 Placebo22

Pulmonary Function as Measured by Normalized FEV1 Over a 4-6 Year Period

Change in FEV1 % of predicted, post-bronchodilator use, from baseline to the end of treatment (4-6 years after randomization). Percent predicted determined from three separate published sets of reference equations for white, black, and Hispanic children - see NEJM 343: 1054-1062, 2000 for more details and references. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment, 4-6 years from baseline assessment

Interventionpercentage of predicted value (Mean)
1 Budesonide0.6
2 Nedocromil-0.5
3 Placebo-0.1

Standardized Depression Scale -- Children's Depression Inventory

Change in total score on the Children's Depression Inventory from baseline to the end of treatment, 4-6 years later. The total score ranges from 0-54 with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression. (NCT00000575)
Timeframe: 4-6 years from baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1 Budesonide-3.2
2 Nedocromil-1.8
3 Placebo-2.2

Reviews

21 reviews available for albuterol and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Metered-dose inhalers versus nebulization for the delivery of albuterol for acute exacerbations of wheezing or asthma in children: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Pediatric pulmonology, 2020, Volume: 55, Issue:12

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Disease

2020
Combination of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol in children and adolescents with asthma: A meta-analysis.
    PloS one, 2021, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Age

2021
[Pregnancy and bronchial asthma].
    Arerugi = [Allergy], 2014, Volume: 63, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator A

2014
Recent advances in COPD disease management with fixed-dose long-acting combination therapies.
    Expert review of respiratory medicine, 2014, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents

2014
Benefits of adding fluticasone propionate/salmeterol to tiotropium in COPD: a meta-analysis.
    European journal of internal medicine, 2014, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Albuterol; Androstadienes; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Flutic

2014
What is the role of tiotropium in asthma?: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Chest, 2015, Volume: 147, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Asthma; Cholinergic Antagonists; Disease Progression; Drug Thera

2015
Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: definition, assessment, and prevention.
    Lancet (London, England), 2015, May-02, Volume: 385, Issue:9979

    Topics: Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Dru

2015
Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Nov-24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Ast

2015
Treating and preventing acute exacerbations of COPD.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2016, Volume: 83, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Respiratory; Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Anti-Bacterial Agents;

2016
Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma.
    Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease, 2008, Volume: 2, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Budesonide; Disease Progressi

2008
Use of dry powder inhalers in acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD.
    Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease, 2009, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Ethanolamin

2009
Insights into interventions in managing COPD patients: lessons from the TORCH and UPLIFT studies.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2009, Volume: 4

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Antago

2009
Management of COPD exacerbations.
    American family physician, 2010, Mar-01, Volume: 81, Issue:5

    Topics: Albuterol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Glucocort

2010
Does tiotropium lower exacerbation and hospitalization frequency in COPD patients: results of a meta-analysis.
    BMC pulmonary medicine, 2010, Sep-21, Volume: 10

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Disease Progression; Hospitalization; Hum

2010
Safety of formoterol in adults and children with asthma: a meta-analysis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2011, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child,

2011
Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012, Sep-12, Issue:9

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diseas

2012
Which long-acting bronchodilator is most cost-effective for the treatment of COPD?
    The Netherlands journal of medicine, 2012, Volume: 70, Issue:8

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Humans; Markov Chains;

2012
Management of asthma during pregnancy.
    Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease, 2013, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic; Antibodies, M

2013
Mechanisms of asthma.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2003, Volume: 111, Issue:3 Suppl

    Topics: Adenine; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Chemokines; Child; Cytokines; Disease Prog

2003
Asthma pathophysiology and evidence-based treatment of severe exacerbations.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2006, May-15, Volume: 63, Issue:10 Suppl 3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Disease Progression; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; S

2006
The role of patient-centered outcomes in the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: how long-term studies contribute to our understanding.
    The American journal of medicine, 2006, Volume: 119, Issue:10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; B

2006

Trials

34 trials available for albuterol and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Effect of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline with Salbutamol on Management of Acute Asthma in Outpatient Adults: A Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial in Emergency Department.
    Iranian journal of allergy, asthma, and immunology, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Ambulatory Care; Asthma; Disease Manage

2017
Asthma phenotypes: do cough and wheeze predict exacerbations in persistent asthma?
    The European respiratory journal, 2017, Volume: 50, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents

2017
Evaluation of human coronary vasodilator function predicts future coronary atheroma progression.
    Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2018, Volume: 104, Issue:17

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Disease Progressio

2018
Surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect in early childhood leads to altered pulmonary function in adulthood: A long-term follow-up.
    International journal of cardiology, 2019, Jan-01, Volume: 274

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cardiac Surg

2019
Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial.
    BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018, Oct-03, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous; Bronchodilator Agents; Car

2018
Airway gene expression in COPD is dynamic with inhaled corticosteroid treatment and reflects biological pathways associated with disease activity.
    Thorax, 2014, Volume: 69, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combin

2014
Albuterol administration is commonly associated with increases in serum lactate in patients with asthma treated for acute exacerbation of asthma.
    Chest, 2014, Volume: 145, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2014
A study to assess COPD Symptom-based Management and to Optimise treatment Strategy in Japan (COSMOS-J) based on GOLD 2011.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2013, Volume: 8

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic A

2013
Characterisation of exacerbation risk and exacerbator phenotypes in the POET-COPD trial.
    Respiratory research, 2013, Oct-29, Volume: 14

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Me

2013
Comparison of conventional medicine, TCM treatment, and combination of both conventional medicine and TCM treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol of a randomized comparative effectiveness research trial.
    Trials, 2014, May-01, Volume: 15

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; China;

2014
Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 μg versus salmeterol 50 μg after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.
    Respiratory research, 2014, Sep-24, Volume: 15

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progress

2014
INSTEAD: a randomised switch trial of indacaterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate COPD.
    The European respiratory journal, 2014, Volume: 44, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progress

2014
Anticholinergic vs Long-Acting β-Agonist in Combination With Inhaled Corticosteroids in Black Adults With Asthma: The BELT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA, 2015, Oct-27, Volume: 314, Issue:16

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Black or African

2015
Intravenous magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre, randomised, double-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial: a pilot study.
    The New Zealand medical journal, 2015, Nov-20, Volume: 128, Issue:1425

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Broncho

2015
Efficacy of a House Dust Mite Sublingual Allergen Immunotherapy Tablet in Adults With Allergic Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA, 2016, Apr-26, Volume: 315, Issue:16

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Sublingual; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrener

2016
Inflammatory and Comorbid Features of Patients with Severe Asthma and Frequent Exacerbations.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2017, 02-01, Volume: 195, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Biomarkers; Body Mass Index; Breath Tests; Bronchodilator Agen

2017
Effect of pharmacotherapy on rate of decline of lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the TORCH study.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Aug-15, Volume: 178, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Body Mass Index; Bronchodilator Agents;

2008
Efficacy and cost comparisons of bronchodilatator administration between metered dose inhalers with disposable spacers and nebulizers for acute asthma treatment.
    The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-

2011
A comparative study of efficacy of salbutamol via metered dose inhaler with volumatic spacer and via dry powder inhaler, easyhaler, to nebulization in mild to moderate severity acute asthma exacerbation in childhood.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2008, Volume: 91 Suppl 3

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child

2008
Value of adding a polyvalent mechanical bacterial lysate to therapy of COPD patients under regular treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone.
    Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease, 2009, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bacteria; Bronchodilator Agents; Cell Extra

2009
Home use of albuterol for asthma exacerbations.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:6

    Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Caregivers; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studi

2009
Efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate by GOLD stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis from the randomised, placebo-controlled TORCH study.
    Respiratory research, 2009, Jun-30, Volume: 10

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Prevalence and progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: results from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health study.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2009
Use of beclomethasone dipropionate as rescue treatment for children with mild persistent asthma (TREXA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2011, Feb-19, Volume: 377, Issue:9766

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents;

2011
Health status in the TORCH study of COPD: treatment efficacy and other determinants of change.
    Respiratory research, 2011, May-31, Volume: 12

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asia; Bronchodila

2011
Development and validation of the Composite Asthma Severity Index--an outcome measure for use in children and adolescents.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2012, Volume: 129, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Algorithms; Asthma; Disease Progression; Drug Utilization; Female; Fol

2012
Efficacy of salbutamol by nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler with home-made non-valved spacer in acute exacerbation of childhood asthma.
    Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Disease Progression; Equipment De

2012
Prediction and course of symptoms and lung function around an exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiratory research, 2012, Jun-06, Volume: 13

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Fema

2012
Original salbutamol versus similar salbutamol in children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
    Archivos argentinos de pediatria, 2012, Volume: 110, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Metho

2012
Use of nebulised magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant in the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD in adults: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    Thorax, 2013, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Exp

2013
Nocturnal awakening caused by asthma in children with mild-to-moderate asthma in the childhood asthma management program.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 110, Issue:3

    Topics: Albuterol; Allergens; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Disease Progression; Female; Forced Expi

2002
The prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Jan-01, Volume: 177, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilato

2008
The prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Jan-01, Volume: 177, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilato

2008
The prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Jan-01, Volume: 177, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilato

2008
The prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Jan-01, Volume: 177, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilato

2008
Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1998, Volume: 158, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthm

1998
Regular inhaled salbutamol and asthma control: the TRUST randomised trial. Therapy Working Group of the National Asthma Task Force and the MRC General Practice Research Framework.
    Lancet (London, England), 2000, May-13, Volume: 355, Issue:9216

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Disease Progre

2000

Other Studies

42 other studies available for albuterol and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Continuous Albuterol With Benzalkonium in Children Hospitalized With Severe Asthma.
    Pediatrics, 2020, Volume: 145, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Albuterol; Asthma; Benzalkonium Compounds; Bronchodilator Ag

2020
Management of COPD exacerbations: pharmacotherapeutics of medications.
    British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 2020, Jul-09, Volume: 29, Issue:13

    Topics: Albuterol; Amoxicillin; Disease Progression; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

2020
Acute bronchodilator responses to β2-agonist and anticholinergic agent in COPD: Their different associations with exacerbation.
    Respiratory medicine, 2017, Volume: 127

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol;

2017
Real-life effectiveness and safety of salbutamol Steri-Neb™ vs. Ventolin Nebules® for exacerbations in patients with COPD: Historical cohort study.
    PloS one, 2018, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alb

2018
Increased β2-adrenoceptor phosphorylation in airway smooth muscle in severe asthma: possible role of mast cell-derived growth factors.
    Clinical and experimental immunology, 2018, Volume: 194, Issue:2

    Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Cells, Cultured; Cyclic AMP; Disease Progression; Fibrobla

2018
Measuring the effects of bronchial thermoplasty using oscillometry.
    Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Airway Resistance; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchial Thermoplasty; Broncho

2019
Changes in biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiratory medicine, 2018, Volume: 145

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Biomarkers; Bronch

2018
Errors in Aerosol Inhaler Use and Their Effects on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Pregnant Asthmatic Women (Subanalysis from QAKCOP Study).
    Canadian respiratory journal, 2018, Volume: 2018

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide,

2018
Real-life effectiveness of inhaler device switch from dry powder inhalers to pressurized metred-dose inhalers in patients with asthma treated with ICS/LABA.
    Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists

2019
Volatile anesthetic rescue therapy in children with acute asthma: innovative but costly or just costly?.
    Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2013, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inh

2013
Influence of β(2)-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms on asthma exacerbation in children with severe asthma regularly receiving salmeterol.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2013, Volume: 110, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Argentina; Asthma; Child; Disease Progre

2013
Correlation between nitrites in induced sputum and asthma symptoms in asthmatic schoolchildren.
    Pediatric pulmonology, 2014, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Disease Progression; Emergency Service,

2014
The association between inhaled long-acting bronchodilators and less in-hospital care in newly-diagnosed COPD patients.
    Respiratory medicine, 2014, Volume: 108, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dis

2014
A woman with breathlessness: a practical approach to diagnosis and management.
    Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2013, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Disease Progression; Dyspnea; Female; Hea

2013
Impact of adherence to treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in asthma patients.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Andr

2014
Impact of adherence to treatment with tiotropium and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases patients.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:7

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator A

2014
Radiological correlates and clinical implications of the paradoxical lung function response to β₂ agonists: an observational study.
    The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2014, Volume: 2, Issue:11

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Black or African American; Body Mass Index; Di

2014
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
A score to predict short-term risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Budes

2015
An Asthma Protocol Improved Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Pediatric Subjects With Status Asthmaticus in the Emergency Department.
    Respiratory care, 2015, Volume: 60, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child,

2015
Prevalence and reversibility of lung hyperinflation in adult asthmatics with poorly controlled disease or significant dyspnea.
    Allergy, 2016, Volume: 71, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Disease Progression; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Huma

2016
[Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome].
    Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2015, Volume: 63, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Prevalence;

2015
Distinct Metabolic Profile of Inhaled Budesonide and Salbutamol in Asthmatic Children during Acute Exacerbation.
    Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2017, Volume: 120, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator A

2017
An observational study of fixed dose combination fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone on asthma-related outcomes .
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Asthma; Cohort Studies; Disease

2008
Beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms affect response to treatment in children with severe asthma exacerbations.
    Chest, 2009, Volume: 135, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Child, Preschool; Disease Progressio

2009
Metabolic acidosis, respiratory distress, and children with severe acute asthma.
    Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2009, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Acidosis; Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Child, Pre

2009
Effect of pharmacotherapy on rate of decline of FEV(1) in the TORCH study.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2009, Mar-01, Volume: 179, Issue:5

    Topics: Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Fluticasone; Forced Expirator

2009
Are we adequately managing children with wheeze using the standard case management guidelines?
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2008, Volume: 91 Suppl 3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Asthma; Ausc

2008
Adrenergic beta(2)-receptor genotype predisposes to exacerbations in steroid-treated asthmatic patients taking frequent albuterol or salmeterol.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2009, Volume: 124, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Alleles; Ast

2009
Healthcare costs associated with initial maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate 250 μg/salmeterol 50 μg combination versus anticholinergic bronchodilators in elderly US Medicare-eligible beneficiaries with COPD.
    Journal of medical economics, 2009, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combinati

2009
New evidence in pulmonary and preventive medicine.
    Internal and emergency medicine, 2010, Volume: 5, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Aminopyridines; Benzamides; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchodilator Ag

2010
TORCH study results: pharmacotherapy reduces lung function decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Hospital practice (1995), 2010, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Body Mass Index; Bronchodilator Agents;

2010
Disease severity and symptoms among patients receiving monotherapy for COPD.
    Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Comorbidity;

2011
Device type and real-world effectiveness of asthma combination therapy: an observational study.
    Respiratory medicine, 2011, Volume: 105, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Androstadienes; A

2011
Beta agonist use during asthma exacerbations: how much is too much?
    The New Zealand medical journal, 2011, Apr-15, Volume: 124, Issue:1332

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; And

2011
Observational study on the impact of initiating tiotropium alone versus tiotropium with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy on outcomes and costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiratory research, 2012, Feb-17, Volume: 13

    Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug

2012
Magnesium use in asthma pharmacotherapy: a Pediatric Emergency Research Canada study.
    Pediatrics, 2012, Volume: 129, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Child; Child, Prescho

2012
Can albuterol be blamed for lactic acidosis?
    Respiratory care, 2012, Volume: 57, Issue:12

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dise

2012
The FDA-mandated trial of safety of long-acting beta-agonists in asthma: finality or futility?
    Thorax, 2013, Volume: 68, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Asthma; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations;

2013
P2X7-regulated protection from exacerbations and loss of control is independent of asthma maintenance therapy.
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2013, Jan-01, Volume: 187, Issue:1

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Black or African American; Case-Control Studies;

2013
The allergic march in pollinosis: natural history and therapeutic implications.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2004, Volume: 135, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Coho

2004
(R)-albuterol for asthma: pro [a.k.a. (S)-albuterol for asthma: con].
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2006, Nov-01, Volume: 174, Issue:9

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Animals; Asthma; Cost of Illness; Disease Models, Animal; Disea

2006
Inflammatory changes, recovery and recurrence at COPD exacerbation.
    The European respiratory journal, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protei

2007