Page last updated: 2024-10-14

cenicriviroc

Description

cenicriviroc: an inhibitor of HIV-1 [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

cenicriviroc : A member of the class of benzazocines that is (5Z)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-benzazocine which is substituted by a 2-methylpropyl, N-{4-[(S)-(1-propyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)methanesulfinyl]phenyl}carboxamide and 4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl groups at positions 1, 5 and 8, respectively. It is a potent chemokine 2 and 5 receptor antagonist currently in development for the treatment of liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID11285792
CHEMBL ID2110727
CHEBI ID149636
SCHEMBL ID3157768
SCHEMBL ID3157748
MeSH IDM0493908

Synonyms (50)

Synonym
(5e)-8-[4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl]-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-[4-[(s)-(3-propylimidazol-4-yl)methylsulfinyl]phenyl]-3,4-dihydro-2h-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
tak 652
tak-652
tak652
tbr652
cenicriviroc
1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide, 8-[4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-[4-[[(1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl]sulfinyl]phenyl]-, (5e)-
(5e)-8-[4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl]-1-isobutyl-n-[4-[(s)-(3-propylimidazol-4-yl)methylsulfinyl]phenyl]-3,4-dihydro-2h-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
tbr-652
bdbm50306033
CVC ,
CHEBI:149636
cenicrivirocum
497223-25-3
(5e)-8-[4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl]-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-(4-{(s)-[(1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl]sulfinyl}phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
tbr 652
D09878
cenicriviroc (usan/inn)
CHEMBL2110727
cenicriviroc [usan:inn]
(-)-8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1-isobutyl-n-(4-(((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
15c116ua4y ,
1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide, 8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-(4-((s)-((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-
8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-(4-((s)-((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
unii-15c116ua4y
S8512
bdbm50422828
cenicriviroc [usan]
8-(4-(2-(butoxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-(4-((s)-((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
(s)-8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1-(2-methylpropyl)-n-(4-(((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5- yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide
1-benzazocine-5-carboxamide, 8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2- methylpropyl)-n-(4-((s)-((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-
cenicriviroc [inn]
cenicriviroc [who-dd]
SCHEMBL3157768
SCHEMBL3157748
AC-31368
CS-6148
HY-14882
AKOS027250788
mfcd28502076
DB11758
(s,e)-8-(4-(2-butoxyethoxy)phenyl)-1-isobutyl-n-(4-(((1-propyl-1h-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)sulfinyl)phenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[b]azocine-5-carboxamide
EX-A1608
AS-35184
Q5058846
AMY12051
tak-652; tbr-652
497223-25-3 (free base)
tbr-652tak-652
BC179068

Research Excerpts

Overview

Cenicriviroc (CVC) is a C-C chemokine receptors type 2 and 5 dual antagonist under evaluation for treating liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) It is a small-molecule chemokin receptor antagonist with highly potent and selective anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activity.

ExcerptReference
"Cenicriviroc (CVC) is a novel, orally administered, potent chemokine 2 and 5 receptor antagonist currently in development for the treatment of liver fibrosis in adults with NASH."( Cenicriviroc for the treatment of liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: AURORA Phase 3 study design.
Abdelmalek, MF; Alkhouri, N; Anstee, QM; Bedossa, P; Fischer, L; Goodman, Z; Neuschwander-Tetri, BA; Pecoraro, ML; Sanyal, A; Seyedkazemi, S; Tacke, F; Wong, VW; Younossi, ZM; Yuan, J, 2020
)
"Cenicriviroc (CVC) is a C-C chemokine receptors type 2 and 5 dual antagonist under evaluation for treating liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). "( Cenicriviroc Treatment for Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis: Final Analysis of the Phase 2b CENTAUR Study.
Abdelmalek, MF; Aithal, GP; Fischer, L; Francque, S; Goodman, Z; Harrison, SA; Kowdley, KV; Loomba, R; Ratziu, V; Sanyal, A; Seyedkazemi, S; Tacke, F; Wong, VW, 2020
)
"Cenicriviroc (CVC) is a small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonist with highly potent and selective anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activity through antagonizing C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) as a coreceptor of HIV-1. "( The chemokine receptor antagonist cenicriviroc inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.
Baba, M; Okamoto, M; Toyama, M, 2020
)
"Cenicriviroc is an oral inhibitor of the chemokine ligand 2/C-C chemokine receptor 2 pathway, which plays an important role in the hepatic recruitment of the macrophages."( Role of cenicriviroc in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Neokosmidis, G; Tziomalos, K, 2018
)
"Cenicriviroc is a potent antagonist of the chemokine coreceptors 5 and 2 (CCR5/CCR2) and blocks HIV-1 entry. "( The dual CCR5 and CCR2 inhibitor cenicriviroc does not redistribute HIV into extracellular space: implications for plasma viral load and intracellular DNA decline.
Colby-Germinario, SP; Hassounah, S; Kramer, VG; Lefebvre, E; Mesplède, T; Oliveira, M; Wainberg, MA, 2015
)
"Cenicriviroc is a CCR5 antagonist which prevents human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) from cellular entry. "( Incompatible Natures of the HIV-1 Envelope in Resistance to the CCR5 Antagonist Cenicriviroc and to Neutralizing Antibodies.
Baba, M; Enomoto, I; Kuwata, T; Matsushita, S, 2016
)
"Cenicriviroc (CVC) is an oral, dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonist with nanomolar potency against both receptors."( Antifibrotic Effects of the Dual CCR2/CCR5 Antagonist Cenicriviroc in Animal Models of Liver and Kidney Fibrosis.
Chou, HL; Friedman, SL; Hashiguchi, T; Hong, F; Jenkins, H; Lefebvre, E; Moyle, G; Plato, C; Poulin, D; Reshef, R; Richards, T; Richman, LP; Thompson, M; Wolfgang, G; Yoneyama, H, 2016
)
"Cenicriviroc is a promising CCR5 inhibitor with potentially important anti-inflammatory effects, and warrants further investigation."( Cenicriviroc, an orally active CCR5 antagonist for the potential treatment of HIV infection.
Iler, CA; Klibanov, OM; Williams, SH, 2010
)

Treatment

ExcerptReference
"Cenicriviroc treatment of HAoECs alone decreased monocyte migration in the HIV-infected group when compared to vehicle (P < 0.01)."( Cenicriviroc inhibits trans-endothelial passage of monocytes and is associated with impaired E-selectin expression.
Baumer, Y; Boisvert, WA; Byron, MM; Chow, D; D'Antoni, ML; Lefebvre, E; McCurdy, S; Mehta, NN; Mitchell, BI; Ndhlovu, LC; Ogata-Arakaki, D; Shikuma, CM, 2018
)

Toxicity

ExcerptReference
" Laboratory and clinical adverse events (AEs) and electrocardiogram changes were recorded."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TBR-652, a CCR5/CCR2 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.
Brinson, C; Cohen, C; Dejesus, E; Ernst, JA; Galindez, J; Gathe, J; Lalezari, J; Martin, DE; Palleja, SM; Thompson, M, 2011
)
" TBR-652 was generally safe and well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to AEs."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TBR-652, a CCR5/CCR2 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.
Brinson, C; Cohen, C; Dejesus, E; Ernst, JA; Galindez, J; Gathe, J; Lalezari, J; Martin, DE; Palleja, SM; Thompson, M, 2011
)
" No network meta-analysis (NMA) analyzes the adverse events of antifibrotic drugs for NAFLD."( Side effect profile of pharmacologic therapies for liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Feng, P; Lei, H; Lei, R; Li, Y; Xie, F; Xiong, Q; Yao, C, 2023
)

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReference
" Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using noncompartmental statistics."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TBR-652, a CCR5/CCR2 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.
Brinson, C; Cohen, C; Dejesus, E; Ernst, JA; Galindez, J; Gathe, J; Lalezari, J; Martin, DE; Palleja, SM; Thompson, M, 2011
)
" As it is metabolized by the liver, cenicriviroc was investigated in hepatic-impaired participants for pharmacokinetic changes."( Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and CCR2/CCR5 Antagonist Activity of Cenicriviroc in Participants With Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment.
Chang, W; Gottwald, M; Lasseter, K; Lefebvre, E; Smith, PF; Somasunderam, A; Utay, NS; Willett, M, 2016
)

Bioavailability

ExcerptReference
" TAK-652 is an orally bioavailable TAK-779 derivative with potent anti-HIV-1 activity."( TAK-652 inhibits CCR5-mediated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in vitro and has favorable pharmacokinetics in humans.
Baba, M; Iizawa, Y; Kanzaki, N; Miyake, H; Shiraishi, M; Takashima, K; Teshima, K; Wang, X, 2005
)
"Chemical modification has been performed on an orally bioavailable and potent CCR5 antagonist, sulfoxide compound 4, mainly focusing on replacement of the [6,7]-fused 1-benzazepine nucleus."( Highly potent and orally active CCR5 antagonists as anti-HIV-1 agents: synthesis and biological activities of 1-benzazocine derivatives containing a sulfoxide moiety.
Aikawa, K; Aramaki, Y; Baba, M; Iizawa, Y; Kanzaki, N; Kuze, Y; Miyamoto, N; Seto, M; Shiraishi, M; Takashima, K, 2006
)
" Since TAK-652 is orally bioavailable and has favorable pharmacokinetic profiles in humans, it is considered a promising candidate for an entry inhibitor of HIV-1."( Isolation and characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistant to the small-molecule CCR5 antagonist TAK-652.
Baba, M; Miyake, H; Okamoto, M; Takashima, K; Wang, X, 2007
)
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
chemokine receptor 5 antagonistAn antogonist that blocks chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5).
anti-HIV agentAn antiviral agent that destroys or inhibits the replication of the human immunodeficiency virus.
chemokine receptor 2 antagonistAn antogonist that blocks chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2).
antirheumatic drugA drug used to treat rheumatoid arthritis.
anti-inflammatory agentAny compound that has anti-inflammatory effects.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (6)

ClassDescription
dietherA polyether in which the number of ether linkages is 2.
imidazolesA five-membered organic heterocycle containing two nitrogen atoms at positions 1 and 3, or any of its derivatives; compounds containing an imidazole skeleton.
sulfoxideAn organosulfur compound having the structure R2S=O or R2C=S=O (R =/= H).
aromatic etherAny ether in which the oxygen is attached to at least one aryl substituent.
secondary carboxamideA carboxamide resulting from the formal condensation of a carboxylic acid with a primary amine; formula RC(=O)NHR(1).
benzazocine
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (4)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
C-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00310.00140.00230.0031AID1546906
C-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00590.00000.67366.6990AID1546905; AID707915
C-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00300.00020.25679.0000AID707914
C-C chemokine receptor type 5Mus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.00030.00030.00170.0052AID1353545
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (105)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
negative regulation of interleukin-12 productionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
establishment of T cell polarityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell-matrix adhesionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
myeloid dendritic cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendritic cell antigen processing and presentationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of hypersensitivityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of humoral immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of actin filament polymerizationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pseudopodium assemblyC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle organizationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of type II interferon productionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-12 productionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
response to prostaglandin EC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
negative thymic T cell selectionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell adhesionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein kinase activityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of JNK cascadeC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
homeostasis of number of cellsC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell receptor signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of filopodium assemblyC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cytokine stimulusC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
response to nitric oxideC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neutrophil chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
lymphocyte migration into lymph nodeC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
mature conventional dendritic cell differentiationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell motilityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendritic cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of immunological synapse formationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell costimulationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glycoprotein biosynthetic process involved in immunological synapse formationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell dendrite assemblyC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dendritic cell apoptotic processC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
blood vessel remodelingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
monocyte chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell cytokine productionC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T-helper 1 type immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of type 2 immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular defense responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase activityC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to woundingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of angiogenesisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular homeostasisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
hemopoiesisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon productionC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-2 productionC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
monocyte extravasationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
T-helper 17 cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of eosinophil degranulationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell differentiationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of alpha-beta T cell proliferationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
homeostasis of number of cells within a tissueC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell activationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelial cellC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine-mediated signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of monocyte chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of immune complex clearance by monocytes and macrophagesC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory response to woundingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
neutrophil clearanceC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte tethering or rollingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NMDA glutamate receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
macrophage migrationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of macrophage migrationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte migrationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of monocyte extravasationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell extravasationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of astrocyte chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of hematopoietic stem cell migrationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
MAPK cascadeC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cellular defense responseC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol by sarcoplasmic reticulumC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
signalingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine-mediated signaling pathwayC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to cholesterolC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage apoptotic processC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (19)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
G protein-coupled receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
C-C chemokine receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
C-C motif chemokine 19 receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
C-C motif chemokine 21 receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
CCR2 chemokine receptor bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
C-C chemokine bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
C-C chemokine receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
virus receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
actin bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
coreceptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
C-C chemokine receptor activityC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
C-C chemokine bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 bindingC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (13)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
mitochondrionC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 7Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
endosomeC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmC-C chemokine receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (8)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1546905Inhibition of CCR2 (unknown origin)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID1353545Displacement of [125I]-RANTES from CCR5 in mouse NIH/3T3 cells after 1 hr2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 147Recent updates for designing CCR5 antagonists as anti-retroviral agents.
AID708110Antiviral activity against Human immunodeficiency virus 1 clinical isolate2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Chemokine receptor antagonists.
AID1546906Inhibition of CCR7 (unknown origin)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID707908Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Chemokine receptor antagonists.
AID707915Antagonist activity at CCR2 assessed as inhibition of CCL2 binding2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Chemokine receptor antagonists.
AID707914Antagonist activity at CCR5 assessed as inhibition of CCL3 binding2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Chemokine receptor antagonists.
AID707899Half life in human2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Chemokine receptor antagonists.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (52)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's5 (9.62)29.6817
2010's29 (55.77)24.3611
2020's18 (34.62)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials12 (23.08%)5.53%
Reviews13 (25.00%)6.00%
Case Studies1 (1.92%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other26 (50.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (18)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Open-label Rollover Study of Cenicriviroc for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis in Adult Subjects With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)[NCT03059446]Phase 2167 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-14Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy based on the results of Part I of the AURORA study.)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of a Combination Treatment of Tropifexor (LJN452) and Cenicriviroc (CVC) in Adult Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Liver Fibrosis[NCT03517540]Phase 2193 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-11Completed
I-SPY COVID TRIAL: An Adaptive Platform Trial to Reduce Mortality and Ventilator Requirements for Critically Ill Patients[NCT04488081]Phase 21,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-31Recruiting
A Proof of Concept, Multiple Dose-Escalating Study to Evaluate the Antiviral Activity, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of the CCR5 Antagonist TBR 652 in HIV 1-Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced, CCR5 Antagonist-Naïve Patients[NCT01092104]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
An Open Label, Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Mile and Moderate Hepatic Impairment on the Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Cenicriviroc (CVC)[NCT02120547]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Phase 1, Single and Multiple-Dose, Open-Label Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Effect of the Acid Reducing Agents, Omeprazole (OME) and Famotidine (FAM), on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Cenicriviroc Mesylate (CVC)[NCT02684799]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
A Phase 2b Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of 100 or 200 mg Once-Daily Doses of Cenicriviroc (CVC, TBR 652) or Once-Daily EFV, Each With Open-Label FTC/TDF, in HIV 1-Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naïve, Adult Patients With Only CCR5-Trop[NCT01338883]Phase 2143 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Cenicriviroc Mesylate on Arterial Inflammation in People Living With HIV[NCT04334915]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-22Withdrawn(stopped due to Industry supporter no longer supporting the study. Protocol A5415's study will run instead.)
Charité Trial of Cenicriviroc (CVC) Treatment for COVID-19 Patients[NCT04500418]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-25Terminated(stopped due to Despite multiple efforts, no further patient could be enrolled since 03/05/2021. A continuation of the study is therefore no longer justified)
Randomized Master Protocol for Immune Modulators for Treating COVID-19[NCT04593940]Phase 31,971 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-15Completed
A Phase 1, Multiple-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Effect of Pioglitazone (PGZ) on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Cenicriviroc Mesylate (CVC) and the Effect of CVC on the PK of PGZ[NCT02342067]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Phase I, Multiple-Dose, Open-Label, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Effect of Dolutegravir (DTG) on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Cenicriviroc (CVC) and the Effect of CVC on the PK of DTG and on a Single Dose of Midazolam[NCT01827540]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
PERSEUS: A Phase 2 Proof of Concept Study Investigating the Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of Cenicriviroc in Adult Subjects With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)[NCT02653625]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-14Completed
H020: Single-Arm Open Label, Pilot Study of CCR5/CCR2 Inhibitor Cenicriviroc (CVC) for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND)[NCT02128828]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
AURORA: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cenicriviroc for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis in Adult Subjects With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis[NCT03028740]Phase 31,778 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-05Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy based on the results of the planned interim analysis of Part 1 data.)
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Severe Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Cenicriviroc and Its Metabolites Following Single Dose Administration[NCT03376841]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Completed
ORION - Effect of CCR2 and CCR5 Antagonism by Cenicriviroc on Peripheral and Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity in Adult Obese Subjects With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Suspected Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)[NCT02330549]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-17Completed
CENTAUR: Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenicriviroc for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Adult Subjects With Liver Fibrosis[NCT02217475]Phase 2289 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-18Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT02128828 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Neuropsychological Performance
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-Point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS by ≥ 2 Points With at Least 1-Point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis at Year 1
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02217475 (52) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AUC (30-120 Min) for Serum FFA
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 1 Beta (IL-1β)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 10 (IL-10)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 6 (IL-6)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 8 (IL-8)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 (CCR2) and C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 5 (CCR5) in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Free Fatty Acids
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment of β-cell Function (HOMA-%B)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Liver Transaminase: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Liver Transaminase: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Macrophage Infiltration in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Matsuda Index
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Corrected T1 (cT1)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: cT1 Mode Values Within the Liver
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Fat Fraction
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Iron Content
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis (LIF) Score
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) [M30 and M65]
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Hyaluronic Acid
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Mac-2 Binding Protein (Mac-2BP)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Marker: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Serum Biomarker: Cluster of Differentiation (CD95)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peripheral Monocyte Subsets (CD14/CD16)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma Glucagon Concentration
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Adiponectin Concentration
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 (CCR2) Ligand: Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1 (MCP-1)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 5 (CCR5) Ligand: RANTES
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum CCR5 Ligand: Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Alpha (MIP-1α)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum CCR5 Ligand: Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Beta (MIP-1β)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Resistin Concentration
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Number of Participants by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) Staging Categories
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Plasma Cenicriviroc Concentrations
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Plasma Glucose at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Plasma Insulin at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Serum FFA at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance (Adipo-IR ) Index
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 120 Minutes [AUC (0-120 Min)] for Serum Glucose
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 30 to 120 Minutes [AUC (30-120 Min)] for Serum Glucose
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AUC (0-120 Min) for Plasma Insulin
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AUC (0-120 Min) for Serum FFA
NCT02330549 (55) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AUC (30-120 Min) for Plasma Insulin
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Normalized ALP at Week 24
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to a TEAE
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Serum ALP of Less Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) in Serum ALP at Week 24
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Decrease in ALP at Week 24
NCT02653625 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 24 in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study Cohort
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort
NCT03028740 (9) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12
NCT03059446 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AE)
NCT03517540 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT03517540 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Resolution of Steatohepatitis
NCT03517540 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Have at Least a One Point Improvement in Fibrosis
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Status for Day 28 Using an 8 Point Ordinal Scale
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Status for Day 14 Using an 8 Point Ordinal Scale
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With SAEs Through Day 28
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With New Supplemental Oxygen Use
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With New Non-invasive Ventilation/High Flow Oxygen Use
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With New Mechanical Ventilation or ECMO Use
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events Leading to Dose Modification
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Met a One Point Improvement in Two Categories From Day 0 (Baseline) to Day 28 Using an 8-point Ordinal Scale
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Recovered by Day 28
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mortality Through 28 Days
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mortality Through 14 Days
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 7
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 4
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 28
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 2
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 14
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 10
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Duration (Days) Alive and Out of the Hospital
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 21
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Supplemental Oxygen
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Non-invasive Ventilation/ High Flow Oxygen
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or ECMO
NCT04593940 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Met a One Point Improvement in One Category From Day 0 (Baseline) to Day 28 Using an 8-point Ordinal Scale

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Neuropsychological Performance

"Raw scores from individual performance on 14 validated neuropsychological tests meant to assess various cognitive domains were converted into standardized z-scores adjusted for age, sex, and education. Z-scores from all tests were aggregated and averaged to determine each subject's Global Neuropsychological Performance Score; NPZ-Global). Z-scores follow a normal distribution with scores < '0' identifying poorer cognition than 'average' and scores > 0 identifying better cognition than average with -1 and +1 represented 1 SD below or higher than average." (NCT02128828)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Cenicriviroc.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 2

Portal inflammation on liver biopsy was graded from 0 to 4 where 0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Marked. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 1
CVC 150 mg1.60.2
Placebo1.50.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 1

Portal inflammation on liver biopsy was graded from 0 to 4 where 0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Marked. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 1
CVC 150 mg1.50.2
Placebo1.60.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12

NFS is calculated using formula: NFS = -1.675 + 0.037 * age (years) + 0.094 * Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m^2) + 1.13 * Impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio - 0.013 × platelet (*10^9/L) - 0.66 * albumin (g/dL). A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg-1.0120.087-1.0640.094-1.0400.139
Placebo-1.2270.029-1.1190.051-1.1320.121

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24

NFS is calculated using formula: NFS = -1.675 + 0.037 * age (years) + 0.094 * Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m^2) + 1.13 * Impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio - 0.013 × platelet (*10^9/L) - 0.66 * albumin (g/dL). A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg-1.0510.225-1.0570.196-1.1000.185
Placebo-1.2520.057-1.2840.046-1.2450.046

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12

The markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on Centaur device and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score < 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - < 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - < 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 6 and 12

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg-0.8370.060-0.8010.041
Placebo-0.786-0.022-0.795-0.064

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24

The markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on Centaur device and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score < 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - < 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - < 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 18 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg-0.758-0.087-0.7650.096
Placebo-0.931-0.129-0.940-0.024

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12

Hyaluronic acid is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis marker. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 6 and 12

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg68.210.769.510.9
Placebo68.7-2.470.7-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24

Hyaluronic acid is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis marker. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 18 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg79.61.479.713.0
Placebo46.45.746.619.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24

Fibrosis-4 is the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), AST and age that is calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age [years] x AST [U/L]) / (platelets [10^9/L] x (square root of ALT [U/L])). A FIB-4 index of < 1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of > 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg1.4400.2131.4400.2191.4440.166
Placebo1.4090.0751.3890.0941.4260.064

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12

APRI is the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet count. It is calculated using formula, APRI = (AST level [/ULN] / platelet counts [10^9/L]) * 100. An APRI index of <=0.50 indicated the absence of significant fibrosis and an index of > 1.50 indicated the presence of significant fibrosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg0.5960.0650.5780.1020.5800.093
Placebo0.649-0.0050.6630.0090.6620.066

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24

APRI is the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet count. It is calculated using formula, APRI = (AST level [/ULN] / platelet counts [10^9/L]) * 100. An APRI index of <=0.50 indicated the absence of significant fibrosis and an index of > 1.50 indicated the presence of significant fibrosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg0.5840.1180.5860.1330.5840.086
Placebo0.6190.0020.6200.0380.633-0.020

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 2

The morphometric quantitative fat content was done to find out the amount of fat accumulated in the liver. A liver biopsy was performed to determine percent fat area, at Year 2. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

,
Interventionpercent fat area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 2
CVC 150 mg21.62-2.96
Placebo23.30-5.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 1

The morphometric quantitative fat content was done to find out the amount of fat accumulated in the liver. A liver biopsy was performed to determine percent fat area, at Year 1. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

,
Interventionpercent fat area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 1
CVC 150 mg21.58-2.79
Placebo22.42-3.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 2

The morphometric quantitative collagen on liver biopsy was determined as percent collagen area (PCA) using Sirius red stain on liver biopsy at Year 2. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

,
Interventionpercent collagen area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 2
CVC 150 mg2.48-0.09
Placebo2.57-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 1

The morphometric quantitative collagen on liver biopsy was determined as percent collagen area (PCA) using Sirius red stain on liver biopsy at Year 1. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

,
Interventionpercent collagen area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 1
CVC 150 mg2.370.02
Placebo2.49-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2

The participant's histologic fibrosis stage was determined using the NASH CRN system and Ishak scale score assessment at Year 1. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. The histologic fibrosis stage based on the Ishak assessment was divided into 1 to 6 stages. Fibrosis was staged with the Ishak scale (ranging from 0=No fibrosis to 6=Cirrhosis). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)Change from Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)Change from Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
CVC 150 mg2.10.02.20.0
Placebo2.00.02.10.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1

The participant's histologic fibrosis stage was determined using the NASH CRN system and Ishak scale score assessment at Year 1. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. The histologic fibrosis stage based on the Ishak assessment was divided into 1 to 6 stages. Fibrosis was staged with the Ishak scale (ranging from 0=No fibrosis to 6=Cirrhosis). A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)Change from Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)Change from Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
CVC 150 mg2.00.02.20.0
Placebo2.10.22.20.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12

Fibrosis-4 is the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), AST and age that is calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age [years] x AST [U/L]) / (platelets [10^9/L] x (square root of ALT [U/L])). A FIB-4 index of < 1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of > 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg1.4170.0711.3880.0991.3980.117
Placebo1.4440.0211.5000.0151.5030.106

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased hip circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg112.35-0.11112.16-0.18111.66-0.08
Placebo114.92-0.30115.09-0.84114.46-0.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased hip circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg113.00-0.83112.70-0.90112.88-1.21
Placebo114.56-0.06114.280.55114.34-0.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 2

The hepatic tissue fibrogenic protein α-SMA level was determined as percent α-SMA + area using α-SMA stain on liver biopsy at Year 2. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2

,
Interventionpercentage of α-SMA positive cells/area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 2
CVC 150 mg2.441.38
Placebo2.472.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 1

The hepatic tissue fibrogenic protein α-SMA level was determined as percent α-SMA + area using α-SMA stain on liver biopsy at Year 1. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1

,
Interventionpercentage of α-SMA positive cells/area (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Year 1
CVC 150 mg2.490.79
Placebo2.410.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased forearm circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg33.380.1033.25-0.0133.09-0.43
Placebo32.950.9732.700.8232.510.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased forearm circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg32.910.0132.870.0233.02-0.64
Placebo32.881.6132.631.7932.790.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12

The body mass index is a value derived from the mass (weight in kgs) and height (in centimeters) of an individual and is calculated as the body mass divided by the square of the body height. A negative change from Baseline represents decreased BMI. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg33.706-0.23233.547-0.19633.374-0.145
Placebo34.129-0.17234.196-0.18234.029-0.013

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24

The body mass index is a value derived from the mass (weight in kgs) and height (in centimeters) of an individual and is calculated as the body mass divided by the square of the body height. A negative change from Baseline represents decreased BMI. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg33.392-0.11333.345-0.04033.278-0.178
Placebo34.713-0.00634.473-0.03934.473-0.393

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12

Caspase-cleaved cytokeratin levels (CK18M30) and total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) were measured as biomarkers of hepatocyte apoptosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased hepatocyte apoptosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg594.2-59.0552.9-26.1567.9107.8
Placebo601.6-56.4550.310.6555.399.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24

Caspase-cleaved cytokeratin levels (CK18M30) and total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) were measured as biomarkers of hepatocyte apoptosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased hepatocyte apoptosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 15)CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 15CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 18)CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 18CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 24)CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 24CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 15)CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 15CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 18)CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 18CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 24)CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg536.4-13.3540.957.3541.839.7687.488.6694.8181.5693.9124.9
Placebo570.8-39.6578.823.8575.4-30.0772.7134.7777.8158.0770.27.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2

Resolution of NASH was defined as having no hepatocellular ballooning (grade 0) and minimal to no lobular inflammation (grade 1 or 0) with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage (worsening defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage). (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
CVC 150 mg9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1

Resolution of NASH was defined as having no hepatocellular ballooning (grade 0) and minimal to no lobular inflammation (grade 1 or 0) with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage (worsening defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage). (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo7
CVC 150 mg6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2

The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo8
CVC 150 mg27

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1

The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo15
CVC 150 mg29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2

Hepatic histological improvement in NAS was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either steatosis, lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Worsening was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo6
CVC 150 mg20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1

NAS was calculated using the following 3 categorical features: steatosis which was scaled from 0-3 (steatosis score is defined as 0= <5%, 1= 5 - 33%, 2= >33 - 66%, and 3= >66%), lobular inflammation which was scaled from 0-3 (lobular inflammation score defined as 0= no foci, 1= < 2 foci/200x, 2= 2-4 foci/200x, and 3= > 4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning which was scaled from 0-2 (hepatocellular ballooning score is defined as 0=none, 1=few balloon cells, 2=many cells/prominent ballooning). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Steatosis)Change from Baseline (Steatosis)Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)Change from Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)Change from Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
CVC 150 mg1.3-0.22.4-0.11.5-0.1
Placebo1.4-0.12.5-0.11.5-0.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-Point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1

Hepatic histological improvement in NAS was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either steatosis, lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Worsening was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo24
CVC 150 mg22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS at Year 2

Hepatic histological improvement in NAS at Year 2 was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo7
CVC 150 mg24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2

Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo3
CVC 150 mg11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1

Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo8
CVC 150 mg11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2

Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo2
CVC 150 mg5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1

Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo4
CVC 150 mg7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Vital signs included blood pressure, temperature, heart rate, and respiration rate. Vital signs were reviewed by the Investigator for clinically significant changes. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CVC 150 mg/CVC 150 mg0
Placebo/CVC 150 mg0
Placebo/Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A 12-lead ECG was performed. ECG results were reviewed by the Investigator for clinically notable abnormalities. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CVC 150 mg/CVC 150 mg0
Placebo/CVC 150 mg0
Placebo/Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS by ≥ 2 Points With at Least 1-Point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis at Year 1

Hepatic histological improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) at Year 1 was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Evaluation of fibrosis stage was based on the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network (NASH CRN) fibrosis staging system, which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. Worsening of fibrosis stage was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo27
CVC 150 mg23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2

NAS was calculated using the following 3 categorical features: steatosis which was scaled from 0-3 (steatosis score is defined as 0= <5%, 1= 5 - 33%, 2= >33 - 66%, and 3= >66%), lobular inflammation which was scaled from 0-3 (lobular inflammation score defined as 0= no foci, 1= < 2 foci/200x, 2= 2-4 foci/200x, and 3= > 4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning which was scaled from 0-2 (hepatocellular ballooning score is defined as 0=none, 1=few balloon cells, 2=many cells/prominent ballooning). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Year 2

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Steatosis)Change from Baseline (Steatosis)Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)Change from Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)Change from Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
CVC 150 mg1.3-0.22.40.01.50.0
Placebo1.5-0.42.40.11.5-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased Tricep Skinfold Thickness. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg25.41-1.5925.07-2.6424.82-1.33
Placebo29.84-1.4529.84-2.2729.91-3.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased Tricep Skinfold Thickness. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg25.41-0.6225.38-1.5225.14-0.26
Placebo28.32-1.2128.53-2.7228.54-1.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased in waist circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg110.26-0.18110.25-0.21110.08-1.00
Placebo110.190.52109.481.36109.360.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased in waist circumference. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg110.250.05110.12-0.54110.02-1.10
Placebo110.350.07110.420.42109.770.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased weight. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24

,
Interventionkg (Mean)
Baseline (Month 15)Change from Baseline to Month 15Baseline (Month 18)Change from Baseline to Month 18Baseline (Month 24)Change from Baseline to Month 24
CVC 150 mg95.32-0.4495.23-0.1695.19-0.56
Placebo98.250.1596.980.0596.98-0.91

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12

A negative change from Baseline represents decreased weight. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12

,
Interventionkg (Mean)
Baseline (Month 3)Change from Baseline to Month 3Baseline (Month 6)Change from Baseline to Month 6Baseline (Month 12)Change from Baseline to Month 12
CVC 150 mg95.59-0.6395.18-0.4795.06-0.28
Placebo97.21-0.5097.18-0.5596.63-0.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

Grade 3-4 abnormal clinical laboratory values that occurred in ≥2% participants were reported. Criteria used for various parameters was:Fasting glucose Grade3:>250 - 500 mg/dL and Grade4: >500 mg/dL; Alanine aminotransferase(ALT)Grade3:>5.0 - 20.0 ×Upper Limit of Normal(ULN)and Grade4:>20.0 ×ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase(AST)Grade3: >5.0 - 20.0 ×ULN and Grade4: >20.0 ×ULN; Activated partial thromboplastin(APT)/Partial thromboplastin time(PTT)Grade3: >2.5×ULN; Triglycerides Grade3 >500 - 1000 mg/dL and Grade4: >1000 mg/dL; Gamma-glutamyl transferase(GGT)Grade3: >5.0 - 20.0 ×ULN and Grade4: >20.0 ×ULN; Creatine kinase Grade 3: >5.0 - 10.0 ×ULN and Grade4: >10.0 ×ULN; Uric acid Grade3:(ULN - 10 mg/dL; ULN - 0.59 mmol/L) and Grade4: >10 mg/dL; Amylase Grade3: >2.0 - 5.0 ×ULN and Grade4: >5.0 ×ULN; Lipase Grade3: >2.0 - 5.0 xULN and Grade4: >5.0 xULN; Phosphorus Grade3: <2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL and Grade4: <1.0 mg/dL and Absolute neutrophil Grade3: <1.0 - 0.5 × 109/L and Grade4: <0.5 × 109/L. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fasting glucose (Grade 3)Fasting glucose (Grade 4)ALT (Grade 3)ALT (Grade 4)AST (Grade 3)AST (Grade 4)APT/PTT (Grade 3)Triglycerides (Grade 3)Triglycerides (Grade 4)GGT (Grade 3)GGT (Grade 4)Creatine kinase (Grade 3)Creatine kinase (Grade 4)Uric acid (Grade 3)Uric acid (Grade 4)Amylase (Grade 3)Amylase (Grade 4)Lipase (Grade 3)Lipase (Grade 4)Phosphorus (Grade 3)Phosphorus (Grade 4)Absolute neutrophil (Grade 3)Absolute neutrophil (Grade 4)
CVC 150 mg100401016281134542332031
CVC 150 mg (Year 1)17017070453816291163455022
Placebo (Year 1)13017010027371728610202031
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg60303015020213100001001
Placebo Then Placebo50201022120402610111011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation

A TEAE was defined as any adverse event that started or worsened on or after the start of the study medication and up to 30 days after the discontinuation of the study medication. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, was life threatening, requires hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT02217475)
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathsTEAEsSAEsTEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
CVC 150 mg/CVC 150 mg01372514
Placebo/CVC 150 mg06888
Placebo/Placebo070125

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AUC (30-120 Min) for Serum FFA

AUC(30-120 min) was derived from the serum FFA values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmin*mmol/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg23.3-5.0-4.2
Placebo25.6-0.9-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of hs-CRP. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12, 24

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg6.39-1.58-0.50-1.35
Placebo5.390.122.330.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 1 Beta (IL-1β)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of IL-1β. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0.08-0.03-0.01-0.03
Placebo0.20-0.16-0.17-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 10 (IL-10)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of IL-1β. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg3.050.200.07-0.61
Placebo3.060.10-0.17-0.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of IL-6. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg3.54-0.67-0.88-1.18
Placebo3.68-0.110.201.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Interleukin 8 (IL-8)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of IL-8. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg21.990.554.161.31
Placebo18.423.290.44-0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biomarker of Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of TNF-α. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12, 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg12.780.680.58-0.06
Placebo12.35-0.43-0.69-0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

,
Interventionkg (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 16Change from Baseline to Week 20Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg94.92-0.22-0.520.210.530.870.170.03
Placebo100.92-1.10-1.43-1.56-1.50-1.73-2.15-2.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 (CCR2) and C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 5 (CCR5) in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

CCR2 and CCR5 corresponding ligands' messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) gene expression were assessed in frozen adipose tissue by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventioncopies per sample (Median)
CCR2, BaselineCCR2, Change from Baseline to Week 24CCR5, BaselineCCR5, Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg13.02.612.73.6
Placebo13.70.815.20.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Free Fatty Acids

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of free fatty acids. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg15.36-0.74-0.09
Placebo17.410.31-2.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of glucose. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg6.09-0.12-0.11
Placebo6.230.090.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of glucose. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg119.55-5.56-3.25
Placebo122.84-3.96-7.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI)

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of insulin. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionμIU/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg33.42-1.56-0.27
Placebo33.38-5.26-6.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment of β-cell Function (HOMA-%B)

HOMA-%B= (20 × FPI)/(FPG - 3.5). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg5.63-0.02-0.15
Placebo5.77-0.74-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

HOMA-IR = (FPG mg/dL x FPI μIU/mL)/405. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg10.56-0.49-0.11
Placebo10.29-1.96-3.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Liver Transaminase: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of ALT. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg55.76-0.220.40
Placebo51.28-6.88-8.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Liver Transaminase: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of AST. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg33.880.461.57
Placebo36.10-3.31-3.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Macrophage Infiltration in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

Macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue was assessed in paraffin-embedded adipose punch biopsies by immunohistochemistry stained for cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68), cluster of differentiation 163 (CD163), C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) and cluster of differentiation 206 (CD206). A reduction in infiltration indicates less inflammation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventioncells/μL (Median)
CD68+, BaselineCD68+, Change from BL to Week 24CD163+, BaselineCD163+, Change from BL at Week 24CCR2+, BaselineCCR2+, Change from BL to Week 24CCR5+, BaselineCCR5+, Change from BL to Week 24CD206+, BaselineCD206+, Change from BL to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg4.01.09.52.010.00.03.01.06.00.0
Placebo3.01.010.51.010.52.03.00.07.0-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Matsuda Index

Change in peripheral insulin sensitivity was measured by the Matsuda Index. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) concentrations measured during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were used to calculate the Matsuda Index. Matsuda Index=10,000/square root [FPG mg/dL x FPI μIU/mL) x (mean glucose mg/dL x mean insulin μIU/mL during OGTT)]. A Matsuda index of <2.5 indicates whole body insulin resistance. A lower Matsuda Index indicates the worst disease state. An increase in the Matsuda Index indicates an improvement in insulin sensitivity (best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg1.22-0.020.03
Placebo1.040.240.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Corrected T1 (cT1)

LiverMultiscan™ via MRI were obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 24. The mean of 4 regions of interest as selected by the technician is reported. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmilliseconds (ms) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg923.72-10.620.03
Placebo911.97-5.60-3.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: cT1 Mode Values Within the Liver

LiverMultiscan™ via MRI were obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 24. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionms (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg917.95-15.37-2.83
Placebo901.67-4.000.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Fat Fraction

LiverMultiscan™ tests via MRI were obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 24. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of fat (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg15.21-0.051.08
Placebo13.56-2.75-5.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Iron Content

LiverMultiscan™ tests via MRI were obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 24. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/g of liver (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg1.240.030.00
Placebo1.29-0.06-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Imaging by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Liver Disease (LiverMultiScan™) Test: Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis (LIF) Score

LiverMultiscan™ tests via MRI were obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 24. The mean of 4 regions of interest as selected by the technician is reported. The LIF Score ranges from 0=no liver disease to 4=severe liver disease. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg2.50-0.110.01
Placebo2.34-0.01-0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) [M30 and M65]

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of CK-18. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg399.351.88
Placebo485.72-88.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 (FGF-21)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of FGF-21. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg266.75-3.53
Placebo406.91427.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Hyaluronic Acid

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of Hyaluronic Acid. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg24.6512.69
Placebo19.784.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Biomarker: Mac-2 Binding Protein (Mac-2BP)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of Mac-2BP. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg5440.5020.94
Placebo7156.96-844.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Marker: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of AFP. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg3.100.00
Placebo2.91-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Noninvasive Metabolic Serum Biomarker: Cluster of Differentiation (CD95)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of CD95. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg10.99-0.34
Placebo11.11-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peripheral Monocyte Subsets (CD14/CD16)

Peripheral monocyte subsets (cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14/cluster of differentiation 16 (CD16)] were measured in fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) samples by flow cytometry. Monocyte results are reported for Total, Classical (CD14+CD16-), Intermediate (CD14+CD16+) and Non-classical (CD14lowCD16+). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

,
Interventioncells/μL (Median)
Total Monocytes, Baseline (BL)Total Monocytes, Change from Baseline to Week 24Classical Monocytes, BaselineClassical Monocytes, Change from BL to Week 24Intermediate Monocytes, BaselineIntermediate Monocytes, Change from BL to Week 24Non-Classical Monocytes, BaselineNon-Classical Monocytes, Change from BL to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg4000258-43.616.8-1.424.9-7.1
Placebo4000351-3122.43.830.9-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma Glucagon Concentration

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of glucagon. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg154.2620.2519.07
Placebo169.134.6119.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

QUICKI is used to measure insulin sensitivity. QUICKI = 1/(log FPI μIU/mL + log FPG mg/dL). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0.290.000.01
Placebo0.290.000.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Adiponectin Concentration

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of adiponectin. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg3.99-0.010.64
Placebo4.500.01-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 (CCR2) Ligand: Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1 (MCP-1)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of MCP-1. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg445.861333.681461.981248.86
Placebo408.1937.5831.9813.87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 5 (CCR5) Ligand: RANTES

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of RANTES (regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg36.95-1.53-2.53-2.13
Placebo46.33-1.130.65-5.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum CCR5 Ligand: Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Alpha (MIP-1α)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of MIP-1α. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg69.6664.1163.7561.08
Placebo62.85-0.11-6.28-2.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum CCR5 Ligand: Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Beta (MIP-1β)

Blood was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of MIP-1β. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 12 and 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 2Change from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg120.59163.26152.21147.83
Placebo102.851.06-3.04-7.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Resistin Concentration

A fasting blood sample was collected and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of resistin. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg10.46-0.49-0.01
Placebo10.440.10-1.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)

Liver biopsy were performed during Screening and at Week 24 only for participants diagnosed with NASH. NAFLD activity score was determined based on 3 components: steatosis (0=<5% to 3=>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=>4 foci/200x) and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2= many cells/prominent ballooning) for a total possible score of 0 to 8. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Screening) to Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg4.33-1.00
Placebo4.00-0.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) Staging Categories

Liver biopsy were performed during Screening and at Week 24 for participants diagnosed with NASH. The NASH CRN Brunt/Kleiner Fibrosis Staging System Fibrosis Stages are: 0 (None), 1 (Perisinusoidal or periportal), 1A (Mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal), 1B (Moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal), 1C (Portal/periportal), 2 (Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal), 3 (Bridging fibrosis) and 4 (Cirrhosis). (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Screening) and Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: Stage 0Baseline: Stage 1Baseline: Stage 1ABaseline: Stage 1BBaseline: Stage 1CBaseline: Stage 2Baseline: Stage 3Baseline: Stage 4Week 24: Stage 0Week 24: Stage 1Week 24: Stage 1AWeek 24: Stage 1BWeek 24: Stage 1CWeek 24: Stage 2Week 24: Stage 3Week 24 : Stage 4
Cenicriviroc 150 mg2210001023000010
Placebo0730020046200000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

Physical examination included assessment of the following body systems: Abdomen, Cardiovascular, Extremities, Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat, Lungs, Lymph Nodes, Neurological, Skin and Thyroid. The number of participants with any abnormal findings at Baseline and participants with any abnormal findings Post-Baseline are reported. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselinePost-Baseline
Cenicriviroc 150 mg33
Placebo813

[back to top]

Plasma Cenicriviroc Concentrations

(NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) one sample predose; Weeks 2, 12 and 24 one sample predose and one sample postdose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline: Pre-DoseWeek 2: Pre-DoseWeek 2: Post-DoseWeek 12: Pre-DoseWeek 12: Post-DoseWeek 24: Pre-DoseWeek 24: Post-Dose
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0.0168.7170.7383.3320.4230.7127.4

[back to top]

Plasma Glucose at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load

Blood was collected during the oral glucose tolerance test and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of glucose. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Prior to Glucose Load, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Week 12: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 12: 30 minutesWeek 12: 60 minutesWeek 12: 90 minutesWeek 12: 120 minutesWeek 24: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 24: 30 minutesWeek 24: 60 minutesWeek 24: 90 minutesWeek 24: 120 minutes
Cenicriviroc 150 mg107.88193.93201.44173.56158.38111.47198.60214.93187.20165.73
Placebo119.39205.90232.74227.00201.04114.88198.65232.09220.61191.26

[back to top]

Plasma Insulin at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load

Blood was collected during the oral glucose tolerance test and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of insulin. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Pre-glucose load, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionμIU/mL (Mean)
Week 12: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 12: 30 minutesWeek 12: 60 minutesWeek 12: 90 minutesWeek 12: 120 minutesWeek 24: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 24: 30 minutesWeek 24: 60 minutesWeek 24: 90 minutesWeek 24: 120 minutes
Cenicriviroc 150 mg25.94168.71211.76204.47218.7125.25172.31219.63218.06216.00
Placebo27.96170.83203.29236.63223.9626.54145.26217.57233.22265.00

[back to top]

Serum FFA at 30, 60, 90 and 120 Minutes Following Glucose Load

Blood was collected during the oral glucose tolerance test and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of FFA. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Pre-glucose load, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Week 12: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 12: 30 minutesWeek 12: 60 minutesWeek 12: 90 minutesWeek 12: 120 minutesWeek 24: Prior to Glucose LoadWeek 24: 30 minutesWeek 24: 60 minutesWeek 24: 90 minutesWeek 24: 120 minutes
Cenicriviroc 150 mg15.6012.016.634.162.5216.6213.057.414.172.73
Placebo17.4414.248.855.434.0814.6012.848.235.664.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is an AE that occurs or worsens after receiving study drug. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg10
Placebo18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate and Temperature. The investigator determined if the vital sign measurements were clinically relevant. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results

A standard 12 lead ECG was performed. The investigator determined if the abnormal results were clinically significant. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance (Adipo-IR ) Index

Change in adipose insulin sensitivity was measured by Adipo-IR. Adipo-IR= (Fasting Serum free fatty acid (FFA) mmol/L x FPI μIU/mL). A higher Adipo-IR index indicates the worst disease state. A lower Adipo-IR Index is best. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg17.77-1.41-0.29
Placebo17.74-0.52-4.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 120 Minutes [AUC (0-120 Min)] for Serum Glucose

AUC(0-120 min) was derived from the serum glucose values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionminutes (min)*mg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg22601-1071329
Placebo24977-1031-1085

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 30 to 120 Minutes [AUC (30-120 Min)] for Serum Glucose

AUC(30-120 min) was derived from the serum glucose values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionminutes (min)*mg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg17816-941383
Placebo20097-923-889

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AUC (0-120 Min) for Plasma Insulin

AUC(0-120 min) was derived from the plasma insulin values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmin*μIU/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg212616402101
Placebo24411-1850-1703

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AUC (0-120 Min) for Serum FFA

AUC(0-120 min) was derived from the serum FFA values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmin*mmol/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg37.2-5.4-3.4
Placebo42.9-1.3-4.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AUC (30-120 Min) for Plasma Insulin

AUC(30-120 min) was derived from the plasma insulin values obtained during the oral glucose tolerance test. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02330549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-glucose load) to 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after glucose load on Weeks 12 and 24

,
Interventionmin*μIU/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cenicriviroc 150 mg181784721818
Placebo21583-1830-1467

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, regardless of whether related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurred after receiving treatment. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg83.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Normalized ALP at Week 24

ALP was used as a primary surrogate marker for measuring Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis disease. Normalization was defined as ALP values outside of the central laboratory reference range at baseline, but within the central laboratory reference range at Week 24. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to a TEAE

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, regardless of whether related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurred after receiving treatment. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg8.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Serum ALP of Less Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) in Serum ALP at Week 24

ALP was used as a primary surrogate marker for measuring Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis disease. The upper limit of normal ALP was defined according to the central laboratory reference ranges. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg10

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Decrease in ALP at Week 24

ALP was used as a primary surrogate marker for measuring Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis disease. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 24 in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

ALP was used as a primary surrogate marker for measuring Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis disease. The percent change from Baseline was defined as 100*(value at each visit - Baseline value)/Baseline value. The Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the Baseline visit (Day 1). A negative percentage change from baseline indicates an improvement. (NCT02653625)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

Interventionpercentage change in ALP (Mean)
Cenicriviroc 150 mg-4.5

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study Cohort

Time to first occurrence from Baseline was defined as the number of days from the first dose of randomized investigational product to the onset of the first occurrence of any of the following adjudicated events: death (all cause), histopathologic progression to cirrhosis, liver transplant, model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15, ascites, hospitalization for onset of: variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. MELD is a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to onset of first occurrence of the event (Up to approximately 42 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
PlaceboNA
Cenicriviroc 150 mgNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo9.9
Cenicriviroc 150 mg8.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=<5% to 3=>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.3
Cenicriviroc 150 mg6.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=<5% to 3=>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo25.0
Cenicriviroc 150 mg22.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo10.3
Cenicriviroc 150 mg8.8

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=<5% to 3=>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.3
Cenicriviroc 150 mg6.6

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=<5% to 3=>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo25.5
Cenicriviroc 150 mg22.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study Cohort

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Drug: Placebo33.2
Drug: Cenicriviroc 150 mg30.5

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12

Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis. (NCT03028740)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
Cenicriviroc 150 mg30.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A treatment-emergent AE is an AE that occurs after a participant receives study drug. (NCT03059446)
Timeframe: Day 1 until the study was terminated (up to approximately 4 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg140

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events~Adverse Events (AEs) are any untoward sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment and then up to 66 weeks" (NCT03517540)
Timeframe: AEs were collected from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment at week 48 and then up to maximum duration of 66 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of participants with at least one Adverse Event (AE)Number of participants with at least one Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Deaths
Arm A: Tropifexor (LJN452) - Dose 14250
Arm B: Cenicriviroc (CVC)4130
Arm C: Tropifexor (LJN452) Dose 1 + CVC4040
Arm D: Tropifexor Dose 2 + CVC42100

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Resolution of Steatohepatitis

Efficacy of tropifexor + CVC in patients with Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis stage F2/F3 as assessed by histological improvement after 48 weeks of treatment compared to monotherapies (tropifexor and CVC) compared to baseline biopsy (NCT03517540)
Timeframe: baseline to 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Tropifexor (LJN452) - Dose 18
Arm B: Cenicriviroc (CVC)8
Arm C: Tropifexor (LJN452) Dose 1 + CVC5
Arm D: Tropifexor Dose 2 + CVC9

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Have at Least a One Point Improvement in Fibrosis

Efficacy of tropifexor + CVC in patients with Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis stage F2/F3 as assessed by histological improvement after 48 weeks of treatment compared to monotherapies (tropifexor and CVC) compared to baseline biopsy (NCT03517540)
Timeframe: baseline to 48 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Tropifexor (LJN452) - Dose 110
Arm B: Cenicriviroc (CVC)12
Arm C: Tropifexor (LJN452) Dose 1 + CVC11
Arm D: Tropifexor Dose 2 + CVC13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Status for Day 28 Using an 8 Point Ordinal Scale

"8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=Death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) To determine a participant's clinical status using the ordinal scale their clinical status was collected at Day 29 assessing day 28.~The scale used in this study is as follows (from worst to best):~Death;~Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO;~Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;~Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen;~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care (COVID-19 related or otherwise);~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical in-patient care; This would include those kept in hospital for quarantine/infection control/social reasons, awaiting bed in rehabilitation facility or homecare, etc.~Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen~Not hospitalized," (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 28

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1-Death2-Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO3-Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices4-Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen5-Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care6-Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires in-patient care7-Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen8-Not hospitalized
Standard of Care + Abatacept562751081149231
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo772681252156207
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc49257420109142
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo42195842115149
Standard of Care + Infliximab532861132135258
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo752771062156217

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Status for Day 14 Using an 8 Point Ordinal Scale

"8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=Death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) To determine a participant's clinical status using the ordinal scale their clinical status was collected at Day 15 assessing day 14.~The scale used in this study is as follows (from worst to best):~Death;~Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO;~Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;~Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen;~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care (COVID-19 related or otherwise);~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical in-patient care; This would include those kept in hospital for quarantine/infection control/social reasons, awaiting bed in rehabilitation facility or homecare, etc.~Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen~Not hospitalized," (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 14

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1-Death2-Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO3-Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices4-Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen5-Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care6-Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires in-patient care7-Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen8-Not hospitalized
Standard of Care + Abatacept24633138130174150
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo40662634112173147
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc314117226113498
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo2538152910113098
Standard of Care + Infliximab2960194442163185
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo42652334112174155

[back to top]

Number of Patients With SAEs Through Day 28

Cumulative Incidence of SAEs through day 28 (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab112
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo124
Standard of Care + Abatacept116
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo131
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc95
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo80

[back to top]

Number of Patients With New Supplemental Oxygen Use

Number of patients with new supplemental oxygen use (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab13
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo5
Standard of Care + Abatacept11
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo6
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc4
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo4

[back to top]

Number of Patients With New Non-invasive Ventilation/High Flow Oxygen Use

Number of patients with new non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen use (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab68
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo89
Standard of Care + Abatacept81
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo92
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc64
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo67

[back to top]

Number of Patients With New Mechanical Ventilation or ECMO Use

Number of patients with new mechanical ventilation or ECMO use (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab70
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo76
Standard of Care + Abatacept71
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo77
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc62
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo55

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events

Cumulative incidence of adverse events of grade 3 and 4 (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab137
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo126
Standard of Care + Abatacept124
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo132
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc101
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo94

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events Leading to Dose Modification

Number of patients with adverse events (serious and non serious) leading to dose modification (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab4
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo7
Standard of Care + Abatacept4
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo7
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc34
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Met a One Point Improvement in Two Categories From Day 0 (Baseline) to Day 28 Using an 8-point Ordinal Scale

"8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=Death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best). Number of people who met a two category improvement.~The scale used in this study is as follows (from worst to best):~Death;~Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO;~Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;~Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen;~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care (COVID-19 related or otherwise);~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical in-patient care; This would include those kept in hospital for quarantine/infection control/social reasons, awaiting bed in rehabilitation facility or homecare, etc.~Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen~Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities." (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1- day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab429
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo415
Standard of Care + Abatacept421
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo406
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc282
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo292

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Recovered by Day 28

Time to recovery by day 28. The number of participants who have recovered by day 28. (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Days 1-28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab421
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo405
Standard of Care + Abatacept414
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo397
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc273
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo287

[back to top]

Mortality Through 28 Days

mortality at day 28 (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab53
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo75
Standard of Care + Abatacept56
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo77
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc49
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo42

[back to top]

Mortality Through 14 Days

mortality at day 14 (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-14

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab29
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo42
Standard of Care + Abatacept24
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo40
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc31
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo25

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 7

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities=best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 7

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab5.0
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo4.8
Standard of Care + Abatacept4.9
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo4.8
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc4.8
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo4.9

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 4

8 point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab3.9
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo3.9
Standard of Care + Abatacept4.0
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo3.9
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc3.9
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo3.9

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 28

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab6.5
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo6.1
Standard of Care + Abatacept6.4
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo6.1
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc6.1
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo6.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 2

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=Death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 2

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab3.5
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo3.5
Standard of Care + Abatacept3.6
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo3.5
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc3.5
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 14

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab6.0
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo5.7
Standard of Care + Abatacept5.8
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo5.7
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc5.7
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo5.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 10

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 10

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab5.6
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo5.3
Standard of Care + Abatacept5.4
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo5.3
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc5.3
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo5.3

[back to top]

Duration (Days) Alive and Out of the Hospital

Days alive and out of the hospital (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Through day 28

Interventiondays (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab14.7
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo13.8
Standard of Care + Abatacept14.1
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo13.7
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc14.2
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo14.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in the 8-point Ordinal Scale From Day 0 to Day 21

8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best) (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 21

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab6.3
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo6.0
Standard of Care + Abatacept6.1
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo5.9
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc5.9
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo6.2

[back to top]

Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Supplemental Oxygen

Days alive and free of supplemental oxygen (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 28

Interventiondays (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab16.3
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo15.2
Standard of Care + Abatacept15.7
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo15.0
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc15.3
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo15.8

[back to top]

Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Non-invasive Ventilation/ High Flow Oxygen

Days alive and free of non-invasive ventilation/ high flow oxygen (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 28

Interventiondays (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab20.7
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo19.5
Standard of Care + Abatacept20.3
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo19.3
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc19.4
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo20.1

[back to top]

Duration (Days) Alive and Free of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or ECMO

Days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 28

Interventiondays (Mean)
Standard of Care + Infliximab23.4
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo22.6
Standard of Care + Abatacept23.4
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo22.6
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc22.4
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo23.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Met a One Point Improvement in One Category From Day 0 (Baseline) to Day 28 Using an 8-point Ordinal Scale

"8-point ordinal scale assessing clinical status (1=Death is worst, 8=not hospitalized/no limitations on activities is best). Number of people who met a 1 point improvement.~The scale used in this study is as follows (from worst to best):~Death;~Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO;~Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;~Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen;~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical in-patient care (COVID-19 related or otherwise);~Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical in-patient care; This would include those kept in hospital for quarantine/infection control/social reasons, awaiting bed in rehabilitation facility or homecare, etc.~Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen~Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities." (NCT04593940)
Timeframe: Day 1-day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care + Infliximab446
Standard of Care + Infliximab Matching Placebo429
Standard of Care + Abatacept435
Standard of Care + Abatacept Matching Placebo421
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc287
Standard of Care + Cenicriviroc Matching Placebo302

[back to top]