Page last updated: 2024-10-30

loratadine and Hay Fever

loratadine has been researched along with Hay Fever in 220 studies

Loratadine: A second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Unlike most classical antihistamines (HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS) it lacks central nervous system depressing effects such as drowsiness.
loratadine : A benzocycloheptapyridine that is 6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine substituted by a chloro group at position 8 and a 1-(ethoxycarbonyl)piperidin-4-ylidene group at position 11. It is a H1-receptor antagonist commonly employed in the treatment of allergic disorders.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"When compared with desloratadine and placebo, Ze 339 shows better efficacy in relieving nasal obstruction symptoms and inhibiting critical components of the chemokine network and as such represents a novel symptomatic and possible prophylactic treatment for allergic rhinitis."9.15Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine. ( Chaker, AM; Dumitru, AF; Greve, J; Hess, L; Hindersin, S; Klenzner, T; Nebel, S; Scheckenbach, K; Schmidt-Weber, CB; Shamji, M; Wagenmann, M; Zahner, C; Zimmermann, C, 2011)
"These healthy adult volunteers with a history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis had no clinical signs of ocular drying after 4 days of twice-daily treatment with topical epinastine."9.12An open-label, investigator-masked, crossover study of the ocular drying effects of two antihistamines, topical epinastine and systemic loratadine, in adult volunteers with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. ( Ousler, GW; Torkildsen, GL; Workman, DA, 2007)
" In this study we investigated the effect of treatment with desloratadine (DL) on systemic inflammation and on nasal and bronchial mucosal inflammation after nasal allergen provocation (NP) in subjects with grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis and asthma."9.11Desloratadine reduces systemic allergic inflammation following nasal provocation in allergic rhinitis and asthma patients. ( Braunstahl, GJ; Fokkens, WJ; Hoogsteden, HC; Kleinjan, A; Overbeek, SE; Reinartz, SM; van Drunen, CM, 2005)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in patients experiencing moderate SAR, nasal congestion, and symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma."9.10Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion. ( Berger, WE; Mansfield, LE; Schenkel, EJ, 2002)
"Safety and efficacy of desloratadine and montelukast each were assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with SAR and symptoms of asthma, who were assigned randomly to once-daily treatment with desloratadine 5 mg, montelukast 10 mg, or placebo for 4 weeks."9.10Comparative effects of desloratadine versus montelukast on asthma symptoms and use of beta 2-agonists in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. ( Baena-Cagnani, CE; Berger, WE; Danzig, M; DuBuske, LM; Gurné, SE; Lorber, R; Stryszak, P, 2003)
"Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <."9.10Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit. ( Harris, AG; Horak, F; Stübner, UP; Zieglmayer, R, 2002)
"The possible effectiveness of loratadine in the treatment of allergic cough was assessed in 20 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and cough due to Parietaria judaica during the pollen season (April to July 1993)."9.08Loratadine in the treatment of cough associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. ( Bianchi, B; Buscaglia, S; Canonica, GW; Catrullo, A; Ciprandi, G; Marchesi, E, 1995)
"We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of loratadine (5 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (120 mg) (L/P) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma."9.08Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma. ( Aaronson, D; Beaucher, W; Berkowitz, R; Bronsky, E; Chen, R; Chervinsky, P; Cohen, R; Corren, J; Fourre, J; Grossman, J; Harris, AG; Meltzer, E; Pedinoff, A; Stricker, W; Wanderer, A, 1997)
" One hundred and seven hay fever patients, sensitive to birch pollen, were randomized into three parallel groups receiving loratadine 40 mg once daily, clemastine 1 mg twice daily, or placebo during the birch pollen season."9.06Treatment of hay fever with loratadine--a new non-sedating antihistamine. ( Irander, K; Odkvist, LM; Ohlander, B, 1990)
"In this double-blind study, 65 patients with hay fever were treated for 14 days with either loratadine 10 mg once daily, astemizole 10 mg once daily, or placebo."9.06Double-blind comparison of loratadine (SCH 29851), astemizole, and placebo in hay fever with special regard to onset of action. ( Oei, HD, 1988)
" Desloratadine therapy significantly reduced nasal and ocular symptom severity, itching and wheals, and sleep and activity disruption (p < 0."8.86Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies. ( Bachert, C; Maurer, M, 2010)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."6.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
"Desloratadine is a once-daily, non-sedating, non-impairing, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist."6.43Review of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria and allergic inflammatory disorders. ( DuBuske, LM, 2005)
"When compared with desloratadine and placebo, Ze 339 shows better efficacy in relieving nasal obstruction symptoms and inhibiting critical components of the chemokine network and as such represents a novel symptomatic and possible prophylactic treatment for allergic rhinitis."5.15Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine. ( Chaker, AM; Dumitru, AF; Greve, J; Hess, L; Hindersin, S; Klenzner, T; Nebel, S; Scheckenbach, K; Schmidt-Weber, CB; Shamji, M; Wagenmann, M; Zahner, C; Zimmermann, C, 2011)
"These healthy adult volunteers with a history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis had no clinical signs of ocular drying after 4 days of twice-daily treatment with topical epinastine."5.12An open-label, investigator-masked, crossover study of the ocular drying effects of two antihistamines, topical epinastine and systemic loratadine, in adult volunteers with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. ( Ousler, GW; Torkildsen, GL; Workman, DA, 2007)
" In this study we investigated the effect of treatment with desloratadine (DL) on systemic inflammation and on nasal and bronchial mucosal inflammation after nasal allergen provocation (NP) in subjects with grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis and asthma."5.11Desloratadine reduces systemic allergic inflammation following nasal provocation in allergic rhinitis and asthma patients. ( Braunstahl, GJ; Fokkens, WJ; Hoogsteden, HC; Kleinjan, A; Overbeek, SE; Reinartz, SM; van Drunen, CM, 2005)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in patients experiencing moderate SAR, nasal congestion, and symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma."5.10Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion. ( Berger, WE; Mansfield, LE; Schenkel, EJ, 2002)
"Safety and efficacy of desloratadine and montelukast each were assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with SAR and symptoms of asthma, who were assigned randomly to once-daily treatment with desloratadine 5 mg, montelukast 10 mg, or placebo for 4 weeks."5.10Comparative effects of desloratadine versus montelukast on asthma symptoms and use of beta 2-agonists in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. ( Baena-Cagnani, CE; Berger, WE; Danzig, M; DuBuske, LM; Gurné, SE; Lorber, R; Stryszak, P, 2003)
"Ketotifen fumarate is a topical antiallergic combination mast-cell stabilizer and antihistamine indicated for the temporary prevention of ocular itching due to allergic conjunctivitis."5.10Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo ( Crampton, HJ, 2003)
"In a double-blind, randomized study 62 patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis received a nasal glucocorticoid (fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray [FPANS], 200 microg/d), an antileukotriene (montelukast, 10 mg/d), a combination of montelukast with an antihistamine (loratadine, 10 mg/d), or placebo throughout the season."5.10Comparison of a nasal glucocorticoid, antileukotriene, and a combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Lötvall, J; Praks, L; Pullerits, T; Ristioja, V, 2002)
"Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <."5.10Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit. ( Harris, AG; Horak, F; Stübner, UP; Zieglmayer, R, 2002)
"The possible effectiveness of loratadine in the treatment of allergic cough was assessed in 20 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and cough due to Parietaria judaica during the pollen season (April to July 1993)."5.08Loratadine in the treatment of cough associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. ( Bianchi, B; Buscaglia, S; Canonica, GW; Catrullo, A; Ciprandi, G; Marchesi, E, 1995)
"We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of loratadine (5 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (120 mg) (L/P) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma."5.08Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma. ( Aaronson, D; Beaucher, W; Berkowitz, R; Bronsky, E; Chen, R; Chervinsky, P; Cohen, R; Corren, J; Fourre, J; Grossman, J; Harris, AG; Meltzer, E; Pedinoff, A; Stricker, W; Wanderer, A, 1997)
" One hundred and seven hay fever patients, sensitive to birch pollen, were randomized into three parallel groups receiving loratadine 40 mg once daily, clemastine 1 mg twice daily, or placebo during the birch pollen season."5.06Treatment of hay fever with loratadine--a new non-sedating antihistamine. ( Irander, K; Odkvist, LM; Ohlander, B, 1990)
"The efficacy and safety of loratadine, 40 mg once daily, were compared with terfenadine, 60 mg twice daily, and placebo in controlling symptoms of ragweed hay fever."5.06Comparison of the efficacy and safety of loratadine, terfenadine, and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bedard, P; Del Carpio, J; Gutkowski, A; Hebert, J; Prevost, M; Schulz, J; Turenne, Y; Yeadon, C, 1988)
"In this double-blind study, 65 patients with hay fever were treated for 14 days with either loratadine 10 mg once daily, astemizole 10 mg once daily, or placebo."5.06Double-blind comparison of loratadine (SCH 29851), astemizole, and placebo in hay fever with special regard to onset of action. ( Oei, HD, 1988)
" Desloratadine therapy significantly reduced nasal and ocular symptom severity, itching and wheals, and sleep and activity disruption (p < 0."4.86Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies. ( Bachert, C; Maurer, M, 2010)
"Desloratadine is approved for the treatment of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in patients aged > or =12 years."4.82Desloratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine. ( Kockler, DR; Limon, L, 2003)
"Levocetirizine and desloratadine are newer antihistamines indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria."4.82A review of the evidence from comparative studies of levocetirizine and desloratadine for the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. ( Canonica, GW; Passalacqua, G, 2005)
"Our purpose in this study was to test whether an H1 receptor antagonist, desloratadine, could reduce the augmented effect of an ongoing allergic reaction on acute bacterial rhinosinusitis."3.72Desloratadine partially inhibits the augmented bacterial responses in the sinuses of allergic and infected mice. ( Blair, C; Kirtsreesakul, V; Naclerio, RM; Thompson, K; Yu, X, 2004)
"Cetirizine 10 mg was statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of SAR symptoms in children ages 6-11 years."2.84Randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetirizine and loratadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Berger, WE; Franklin, KB; LaForce, CF; Nayak, AS; Patel, MK; Urdaneta, ER; Wu, MM, 2017)
"Bilastine is a novel, nonsedating H(1)-antihistamine developed for symptomatic treatment of Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria."2.74Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients. ( Bachert, C; Dimitrov, V; Gorina, MM; Ivan, P; Kuna, P; Loureiro, A; Sanquer, F; van de Heyning, P, 2009)
"Desloratadine was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing post-challenge ocular pruritus (P<0."2.74Evaluation of desloratadine on conjunctival allergen challenge-induced ocular symptoms. ( Gomes, P; Gopalan, G; Srinivasan, S; Torkildsen, GL; Welch, D, 2009)
"Loratadine-montelukast was more effective than placebo (P < or = ."2.74Efficacy of loratadine-montelukast on nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure unit. ( Briscoe, MP; Danzig, M; Day, JH; Ratz, JD; Yao, R, 2009)
"Desloratadine was effective and safe."2.74Efficacy of desloratadine in intermittent allergic rhinitis: a GA(2)LEN study. ( Bachert, C; Bindslev Jensen, C; Bousquet, J; Canonica, GW; Fokkens, WJ; Keith, P; Lorber, R; Mullol, J; Ring, J; Van Cauwenberge, P; Zuberbier, T, 2009)
" The incidence of side effect of treatment group was 2."2.73[The investigation of efficacy and safety of Aerius to seasonal allergic rhinitis]. ( Cui, Y; Gao, Q; Liu, Z; Xu, K; You, X, 2008)
"Desloratadine is a potent antihistamine."2.73The effect of regular versus on-demand desloratadine treatment in children with allergic rhinitis. ( Adalioglu, G; Dizdar, EA; Dogan, C; Kalayci, O; Keskin, O; Sekerel, BE; Tuncer, A, 2007)
"Desloratadine was well tolerated, with an AE rate similar to placebo."2.73Desloratadine improves quality of life and symptom severity in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Devillier, P; Dreyfus, I; Neukirch, C; Pradalier, A, 2007)
"Both mometasone furoate NS treatment regimens were more effective than loratadine or placebo for TNSS (P < ."2.73Clinical benefits of combination treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine vs monotherapy with mometasone furoate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Anolik, R, 2008)
"Desloratadine was significantly better than placebo (p < 0."2.72Azelastine nasal spray and desloratadine tablets in pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pharmacodynamic study of onset of action and efficacy. ( Horak, F; Kavina, A; Marschall, K; Munzel, U; Petzold, U; Zieglmayer, R; Zieglmayer, UP, 2006)
"Desloratadine treatment for 14 days improved nasal airflow and resistance as well as symptom and QOL scores in patients with symptomatic SAR during the allergy season."2.72Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial. ( Harris, AG; Iezzoni, D; Jalowayski, AA; Meltzer, EO; Vogt, K, 2006)
"Desloratadine was significantly superior to placebo in maintaining nasal airflow (P 2.71Comparison of the effects of desloratadine 5-mg daily and placebo on nasal airflow and seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms induced by grass pollen exposure. ( Harris, AG; Horak, F; Stübner, P; Zieglmeyer, R, 2003)
"Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist recently approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)."2.71Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast. ( Arastu, R; Baidoo, CA; Faris, MA; Howland, WC; Klein, KC; Philpot, EE; Ratner, PH; Rickard, KA, 2003)
"Desloratadine tablet was administered in 5 mg doses."2.71[Multicenter study of the effectiveness and tolerability of desloratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis]. ( Farkas, H, 2003)
"Azelastine nasal spray is an effective treatment for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis who do not respond to loratadine and is an alternative to switching to another oral antihistamine or to using multiple antihistamines."2.71Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in patients with an unsatisfactory response to loratadine. ( Berger, WE; White, MV, 2003)
"Montelukast was more effective than placebo in improving scores for the primary endpoint of daytime nasal symptoms (P = 0."2.71Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period. ( Meltzer, EO; Menten, J; Pedinoff, AJ; Philip, G; Ratner, PH; Reiss, TF; van Adelsberg, J, 2003)
" Overall, all treatments were safe and well tolerated."2.71Efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Hampel, F; Howland, W; Ratner, P; Van Bavel, J, 2004)
" All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were recorded."2.71A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, comparing the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (20 and 10 mg), a new PAF and H1 receptor-specific histamine antagonist, to loratadine 10 mg in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Dumur, JP; Izquierdo, I; Pérez, I; Saint-Martin, F, 2004)
"Both ebastine 20 and 10 mg were well tolerated and proved safe in the treatment of SAR."2.71A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Hampel, F; Howland, W; Ratner, P; Van Bavel, J, 2004)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."2.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
" Desloratadine, an oral non-sedating antihistamine, has been shown in multiple studies to be safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of AR and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in adults and adolescents."2.71Safety of desloratadine syrup in children. ( Bloom, M; Herron, J; Staudinger, H, 2004)
" No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported."2.71Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Grubbe, R; Lutsky, B; Pleskow, W; Weiss, S, 2005)
"Japanese cedar pollinosis, a common disease with morbidity of approximately 20% in the Japanese population, is characterized by subjectively irritating symptoms during an annual 3-month period."2.71The efficacy of short-term administration of 3 antihistamines vs placebo under natural exposure to Japanese cedar pollen. ( Fujieda, S; Hyo, S; Kawada, R; Kitazawa, S; Takenaka, H, 2005)
"Desloratadine 5-20 mg was significantly (P <."2.7024-hour efficacy of once-daily desloratadine therapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis [ISRCTN32042139]. ( Lorber, R; Salmun, LM, 2002)
"Loratadine was significantly superior to placebo in 3 of 10 trials (30%), consistent with rates found in 3 pivotal group trials used for FDA approval (24%, 17%, and 0%)."2.70Single-patient drug trial methodology for allergic rhinitis. ( Del Rio, E; Rebell, G; Reitberg, DP; Weiss, SL; Zaias, N, 2002)
"The objective of the study was to evaluate the adverse reactions of Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables (LTD+PSE Repetabs) (Loratadine 5 mg + Pseudoephedrine 120 mg) twice daily with that of loratadine (5 mg) twice daily and pseudoephedrine (60 mg) quarter daily in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis."2.70A comparative study of the side effects between pseudoephedrine in Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables and loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet in treatment of allergic rhinitis in Thai patients. ( Chochaipanichnon, L; Kerekhanjanarong, V; Saengpanich, S; Supiyaphun, P, 2002)
"Desloratadine (5 mg) was administered orally once daily for 5 days in a placebo-controlled, crossover design to 24 patients with allergic rhinitis."2.70Desloratadine reduces allergen challenge-induced mucinous secretion and plasma exudation in allergic rhinitis. ( Andersson, M; Greiff, L; Persson, CG, 2002)
"Desloratadine is a new treatment option for patients with IAR and nasal congestion."2.70Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis. ( Nayak, AS; Schenkel, E, 2001)
"Montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine is well tolerated and provides clinical and quality-of-life benefits for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis."2.70Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall. ( Lu, S; Malice, MP; Nayak, AS; Philip, G; Reiss, TF, 2002)
"Cetirizine is a newer once-daily selective H1-antagonist."2.69Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit. ( Briscoe, M; Day, JH; Widlitz, MD, 1998)
"The histamine covariant was more important in the allergen effect of astemizole than in that of loratadine."2.69Changes in skin-test reactivity do not correlate with clinical efficacy of H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bousquet, J; Cougnard, J; Czarlewski, W; Danzig, M; Michel, FB, 1998)
"Loratadine was not statistically different from placebo in clinician and patient symptom score ratings nor in overall clinician and patient evaluations."2.69A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bowers, BW; Cook, CK; Hampel, FC; Howland, WC; Martin, BG; Ratner, PH; Rogenes, PR; van Bavel, JH; Westlund, RE, 1998)
" Twenty-four hours after intake, the dose-response curve of nasal obstruction to histamine was significantly lower after treatment with cetirizine compared with placebo (P < 0."2.69Nasal effect of cetirizine and loratadine at 24 hours in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Benabdesselam, O; Frossard, N; Glasser, N; Lacronique, J; Melac, M; Pauli, G, 1998)
"Cetirizine was more effective on histamine skin test responses."2.69Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine. ( Bousquet, J; Demoly, P; Harris, AG; Michel, FB; Persi, L; Tisserand, B, 1999)
"Azelastine hydrochloride is an H1-receptor antagonist with antiinflammatory properties that is available in the US as Astelin Nasal Spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis."2.69Double-blind trials of azelastine nasal spray monotherapy versus combination therapy with loratadine tablets and beclomethasone nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Rhinitis Study Groups. ( Berger, WE; Fineman, SM; Lieberman, P; Miles, RM, 1999)
"Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous was significantly (P < ."2.69Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray versus loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: efficacy and quality of life. ( Condemi, J; Lim, J; Schulz, R, 2000)
"Fexofenadine HCl was also significantly better than loratadine (P 2.69Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Juniper, EF; Van Cauwenberge, P, 2000)
" Somnolence scores were similar for both groups at baseline and at the time of dosing (8:00 AM)."2.69Loratadine versus cetirizine: assessment of somnolence and motivation during the workday. ( Gates, D; Greiding, L; Heithoff, K; Ramon, F; Salmun, LM; Scharf, M, 2000)
"Loratadine was well tolerated in this small, selected group of children aged 2 to 5 years at a dose providing exposure similar to that with the adult dose (ie, 10 mg once daily)."2.69The pharmacokinetics, electrocardiographic effects, and tolerability of loratadine syrup in children aged 2 to 5 years. ( Affrime, MB; Banfield, C; Herron, JM; Lorber, R; Padhi, D; Salmun, LM, 2000)
" All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events."2.68Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Boggs, P; Bronsky, E; Findlay, S; Gawchik, S; Georgitis, J; Mansmann, H; Meltzer, E; Morris, R; Sholler, L; Wolfe, J, 1995)
" Major and total symptom complex scores, global efficacy and overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed."2.68Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Meltzer, EO; Weiler, JM; Widlitz, MD, 1996)
"Pretreatment with loratadine seems to reduce both the number and severity of systemic reactions in specific cluster immunotherapy."2.68Antihistamine premedication in specific cluster immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Johnsen, CR; Malling, HJ; Mosbech, H; Nielsen, L; Poulsen, LK, 1996)
"Mometasone furoate and BDP were equally well tolerated."2.68Once-daily mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (Nasonex) in seasonal allergic rhinitis: an active- and placebo-controlled study. ( Hebert, JR; Lutsky, BN; Nolop, K, 1996)
" In conclusion, this study found cetirizine and loratadine to have similar nasal efficacy at therapeutic dosage 4 h after intake, whereas cetirizine was more effective than loratadine 1."2.68Onset of action in the nasal antihistaminic effect of cetirizine and loratadine in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Benabdesselam, O; Braun, JJ; Frossard, N; Glasser, N; Lacronique, J; Melac, M; Pauli, G, 1997)
" Both were dosed at 10 mg/day."2.68Loratadine treatment of rhinitis due to pollen allergy reduces epithelial ICAM-1 expression. ( Canonica, GW; Ciprandi, G; Danzig, M; Passalacqua, G; Pronzato, C; Ricca, V, 1997)
"05) for controlling nasal symptoms and safe in terms of short term biochemical and haematological changes and adverse effects noted."2.67Efficacy and safety of loratadine compared with astemizole in Malaysian patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Amin, MJ; Lee, ST, 1994)
"Astemizole-treated patients showed statistically significantly more weight gain than did loratadine-treated patients."2.67Once daily loratadine versus astemizole once daily. ( Banov, C; Boggs, P; Chervinsky, P; Georgitis, J; Greenstein, S; Vande Souwe, R, 1994)
"Terfenadine was more effective than both loratadine (P less than ."2.67Suppression of epicutaneous reactivity by terfenadine and loratadine. ( Small, P, 1992)
"In a three-way, double-blind, crossover study the onset of action and effects at the end of the dosing interval of 10 mg/day astemizole, 10 mg/day loratadine and 120 mg/day terfenadine forte given for 3 days to six atopic volunteers were assessed using the Vienna challenge chamber (VCC)."2.67Onset and duration of the effects of three antihistamines in current use--astemizole, loratadine and terfenadine forte--studied during prolonged, controlled allergen challenges in volunteers. ( Berger, U; Horak, F; Jäger, S, 1992)
" Recommended dosage of loratadine (CAS 79794-75-5) is 10 mg once daily, whereas terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) until recently has been recommended as 60 mg twice daily."2.67Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow. ( Hindberg Rasmussen, W; Høi, L; Lorentzen, KA; Nüchel Petersen, L; Olsen, OT; Svendsen, UG, 1992)
"Thus loratadine is an effective and safe antihistamine when given once daily for the symptomatic relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis."2.67Comparative effects of loratadine and azatadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Katelaris, C, 1990)
"Loratadine appears to be a simple, effective and safe therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis."2.66Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis. ( Andreoli, A; Boner, AL; Marchesi, E; Miglioranzi, P; Richelli, C, 1989)
"Loratadine was particularly effective compared with placebo in relieving nasal discharge, sneezing, and itching/burning eyes."2.66Efficacy and safety of loratadine (10 mg once daily), terfenadine (60 mg twice daily), and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bedard, PM; Del Carpio, J; Gutkowski, A; Hebert, J; Kabbash, L; Nedilski, M; Prevost, M; Schulz, J; Turenne, Y, 1989)
"Loratadine was found to be both safe and efficacious."2.66Safety and efficacy of loratadine (Sch-29851): a new non-sedating antihistamine in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bergner, A; Connell, JT; Dockhorn, RJ; Falliers, CJ; Grabiec, SV; Shellenberger, MK; Weiler, JM, 1987)
"Loratadine is a long-acting H1 antagonist devoid of anticholinergic and sedative effects."2.66Double-blind placebo-controlled study of loratadine, mequitazine, and placebo in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Bousquet, J; Lherminier, M; Michel, FB; Montes, F; Schwab, D; Skassa-Brociek, W; Verdier, M, 1988)
" Mean reductions in nasal congestion scores were comparable between the once- and twice-daily dosing regimens of the combination drug."2.45Desloratadine and pseudoephedrine combination therapy as a comprehensive treatment for allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion. ( Anolik, R, 2009)
"Fexofenadine was associated with significantly lower nasal congestion scores compared with placebo in 4 studies (P <- 0."2.45A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Bachert, C, 2009)
"Desloratadine has been approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for the treatment of intermittent and persistent AR, as defined by the ARIA classification."2.44Desloratadine treatment for intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis: a review. ( Bachert, C; van Cauwenberge, P, 2007)
" No major cytochrome P450 inhibition has been reported with desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine, and the bioavailability of desloratadine is minimally affected by drugs interfering with transporter molecules."2.44Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review. ( Devillier, P; Faisy, C; Roche, N, 2008)
"Histamine is a key mediator of the allergic immediate reaction."2.43[Oral second generation antihistamines in allergic rhinitis]. ( Riechelmann, H, 2005)
"Desloratadine is a once-daily, non-sedating, non-impairing, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist."2.43Review of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria and allergic inflammatory disorders. ( DuBuske, LM, 2005)
" Although first-generation antihistamines can cause sedation and cognitive impairment, second-generation antihistamines are relatively non-sedating and free of such adverse events owing to their comparative inability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier."2.43The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease. ( Berger, WE, 2005)
"Desloratadine is a once-daily oral antihistamine with a favourable sedation profile that is approved for the treatment of AR and CIU."2.43Adult and paediatric poor metabolisers of desloratadine: an assessment of pharmacokinetics and safety. ( Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Khalilieh, S; Kim, K; Lorber, R; Lutsky, B; Manitpisitkul, P; Prenner, B; Wang, Z, 2006)
"Desloratadine was used as a probe to further elucidate the mechanisms involved during an allergic response."2.42Anti-inflammatory properties of desloratadine. ( Agrawal, DK, 2004)
"Desloratadine treatment was associated with less deterioration from baseline in the mean nasal airflow (P < 0."2.41Impact and modulation of nasal obstruction. ( Horak, F, 2002)
"Triamcinolone is a commonly used synthetic corticosteroid that has recently been tested in a large clinical trial for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and shown to have some benefits."2.41Triamcinolone: new and old indications. ( Doggrell, SA, 2001)
"In this review of the current treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, the clinical studies that compare these four new second-generation H1-receptor antagonists are discussed."2.38H1-receptor antagonist treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Kaiser, HB, 1990)
"Loratadine is a long acting antihistamine which has a high selectivity for peripheral histamine H1-receptors and lacks the central nervous system depressant effects often associated with some of the older antihistamines."2.38Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. ( Clissold, SP; Goa, KL; Sorkin, EM, 1989)
"Treatment with desloratadine dominated placebo (cost less and resulted in greater effectiveness) for all measures of effectiveness."1.36The cost-effectiveness of treatment with desloratadine in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. ( Lorber, R; Navaratnam, P; Shekar, T; Sullivan, PW, 2010)
" Second-generation antihistamines have become increasingly popular because of their comparable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects relative to their first-generation counterparts, and the safety and efficacy of this drug class are established in the adult population."1.35Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast. ( Moeller, ML; Nahata, MC; Phan, H, 2009)
"Desloratadine is a new, selective, H(1)-receptor antagonist that also has anti-inflammatory activity."1.31Desloratadine: A new, nonsedating, oral antihistamine. ( Geha, RS; Meltzer, EO, 2001)
"Desloratadine was well tolerated in clinical trials and had an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo in patients with SAR (with or without asthma) or CIU."1.31Desloratadine. ( Jarvis, B; McClellan, K, 2001)

Research

Studies (220)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199013 (5.91)18.7374
1990's54 (24.55)18.2507
2000's134 (60.91)29.6817
2010's19 (8.64)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Yonekura, S1
Okamoto, Y1
Sakurai, D1
Iinuma, T1
Sakurai, T1
Yoneda, R1
Kurita, J1
Hanazawa, T1
Kawasaki, Y1
Nayak, AS3
Berger, WE6
LaForce, CF1
Urdaneta, ER1
Patel, MK1
Franklin, KB1
Wu, MM2
Liu, Y2
Ye, XJ1
Zhao, CL1
Ji, Q1
Imoto, Y1
Takabayashi, T1
Sakashita, M1
Tokunaga, T1
Morikawa, T1
Ninomiya, T1
Okamoto, M1
Narita, N1
Fujieda, S2
Ozturk, AB1
Celebioglu, E1
Karakaya, G1
Kalyoncu, AF1
Xiong, M1
Fu, X1
Deng, W1
Lai, H1
Yang, C1
Costa, DJ1
Marteau, P1
Amouyal, M1
Poulsen, LK2
Hamelmann, E1
Cazaubiel, M1
Housez, B1
Leuillet, S1
Stavnsbjerg, M1
Molimard, P1
Courau, S1
Bousquet, J8
Lu, Y1
Yin, M1
Cheng, L2
Durham, SR2
Creticos, PS1
Nelson, HS1
Li, Z1
Kaur, A1
Meltzer, EO8
Nolte, H2
You, X1
Liu, Z1
Xu, K1
Gao, Q1
Cui, Y1
Corren, J2
Lemay, M1
Lin, Y1
Rozga, L1
Randolph, RK1
Li, Y1
Liu, F1
Ciebiada, M1
Ciebiada, MG1
Kmiecik, T1
DuBuske, LM3
Gorski, P2
Bachert, C7
Kuna, P3
Sanquer, F1
Ivan, P1
Dimitrov, V1
Gorina, MM1
van de Heyning, P1
Loureiro, A1
Torkildsen, GL2
Gomes, P1
Welch, D1
Gopalan, G2
Srinivasan, S1
Day, JH7
Briscoe, MP5
Ratz, JD2
Danzig, M5
Yao, R1
Luo, H1
Tao, Z1
Yan, N1
Liang, J1
Wang, P1
Wang, J1
Anolik, R3
Grubbe, RE1
Lumry, WR1
Canonica, GW8
Mullol, J2
Van Cauwenberge, P5
Bindslev Jensen, C1
Fokkens, WJ3
Ring, J2
Keith, P2
Lorber, R7
Zuberbier, T2
Demoly, P2
Dreyfus, I2
Dhivert-Donnadieu, H1
Mesbah, K1
Lu, S3
Malice, MP2
Dass, SB1
Reiss, TF4
Phan, H1
Moeller, ML1
Nahata, MC1
Maurer, M1
Sullivan, PW1
Navaratnam, P1
Shekar, T1
Horak, F8
Zieglmayer, P1
Zieglmayer, R4
Lemell, P1
Jensen, CB1
Dumitru, AF1
Shamji, M1
Wagenmann, M1
Hindersin, S1
Scheckenbach, K1
Greve, J1
Klenzner, T1
Hess, L1
Nebel, S1
Zimmermann, C1
Zahner, C1
Schmidt-Weber, CB1
Chaker, AM1
Johnson, VV1
Mösges, R1
König, V1
Köberlein, J1
Stephan, F1
Maatouk, I1
Moutran, R1
Obeid, G1
Karaki, M1
Akiyama, K1
Mori, N1
Salmun, LM3
Reitberg, DP1
Del Rio, E1
Weiss, SL1
Rebell, G1
Zaias, N1
Supiyaphun, P1
Chochaipanichnon, L1
Kerekhanjanarong, V1
Saengpanich, S2
Wilson, AM2
Haggart, K2
Sims, EJ2
Lipworth, BJ4
Greiff, L2
Persson, CG2
Andersson, M3
Schenkel, EJ2
Mansfield, LE1
Limon, L1
Kockler, DR1
Sabbah, A1
Lee, DK2
Jackson, CM1
Ratner, P4
Hampel, F3
Gispert, J2
Baena-Cagnani, CE2
Gurné, SE1
Stryszak, P1
Stübner, P2
Zieglmeyer, R1
Harris, AG6
deTineo, M4
Naclerio, RM5
Baroody, FM4
Nathan, RA2
Ratner, PH4
Howland, WC2
Arastu, R1
Philpot, EE1
Klein, KC1
Baidoo, CA1
Faris, MA1
Rickard, KA1
Topuz, B1
Ogmen, GG1
Currie, GP1
Anderson, SD1
Jahnz-Rózyk, K1
Targowski, T1
Głodzinska-Wyszogrodzka, E1
Płusa, T1
Farkas, H1
Glass, DJ1
Harper, AS1
Crampton, HJ1
White, MV1
Hill, SL1
Krouse, JH1
Wilken, JA1
Kane, RL1
Ellis, AK2
Rafeiro, E3
Sullivan, CL1
van Adelsberg, J1
Philip, G2
Pedinoff, AJ1
Menten, J1
See, S1
Moinuddin, R2
Maleckar, B1
Satish, U1
Streufert, S1
Dewan, M1
Voort, SV1
Van Bavel, J2
Howland, W2
Bender, BG2
Milgrom, H2
Magnan, A1
Saint-Martin, F1
Dumur, JP1
Pérez, I1
Izquierdo, I1
Ciprandi, G5
Cirillo, I1
Vizzaccaro, A1
Tosca, MA3
Uras, N1
Karadag, A1
Kurtaran, H1
Yilmaz, T1
Agrawal, DK1
Kirtsreesakul, V1
Blair, C2
Yu, X1
Thompson, K1
Li, H1
Zhang, H1
Yin, J1
Wang, R1
Fang, Q1
Riechelmann, H1
Rossi, GA1
Passalacqua, G3
Bianchi, B2
Le Grazie, C1
Bloom, M1
Staudinger, H1
Herron, J1
Pleskow, W1
Grubbe, R1
Weiss, S1
Lutsky, B2
Hyo, S1
Kawada, R1
Kitazawa, S1
Takenaka, H1
Conboy-Ellis, K1
Liu, X1
Xing, Z1
Gao, Z1
Reinartz, SM1
Overbeek, SE1
Kleinjan, A1
van Drunen, CM1
Braunstahl, GJ1
Hoogsteden, HC1
Cyr, MM1
Hayes, LM1
Crawford, L1
Baatjes, AJ1
Keith, PK2
Denburg, JA1
Falqués, M1
Chuecos, F1
Esbrí, R1
Peris, F1
Luria, X1
Rosales, MJ1
Green, GR1
Zieglmayer, UP1
Kavina, A1
Marschall, K1
Munzel, U1
Petzold, U1
Kirmaz, C1
Aydemir, O1
Bayrak, P1
Yuksel, H2
Ozenturk, O1
Degirmenci, S1
Shedden, A1
Jalowayski, AA1
Vogt, K1
Iezzoni, D1
Prenner, B1
Kim, K1
Gupta, S1
Khalilieh, S1
Kantesaria, B1
Manitpisitkul, P1
Wang, Z1
Tworek, D2
Bocheńska-Marciniak, M2
Kupczyk, M2
Raphael, GD1
Angello, JT1
Druce, HM1
Keskin, O2
Alyamac, E1
Tuncer, A2
Dogan, C2
Adalioglu, G2
Sekerel, BE2
Spangler, DL1
Brunton, S1
Blaiss, MS2
Bordignon, V1
Burastero, SE1
Rak, S1
Yang, WH1
Pedersen, MR1
Lehman, JM1
Dizdar, EA1
Kalayci, O1
Pradalier, A1
Neukirch, C1
Devillier, P2
Luciuk, G1
Ousler, GW1
Workman, DA1
Pinar, E1
Eryigit, O1
Oncel, S1
Calli, C1
Yilmaz, O1
Bogacka, E1
Sterchaluk-Grzyb, E1
Buczyłko, K1
Chwała, C1
Zielińska-Bliźniewska, H1
Wagner, A1
Dzwonnik, A1
Roche, N1
Faisy, C1
Mucha, SM1
Kleine-Tebbe, J1
Josties, C1
Frank, G1
Stalleicken, D1
Buschauer, A1
Schunack, W1
Kunkel, G1
Czarnetzki, B1
Siergiejko, Z2
Michalska, I1
Buko, Z2
Swiderska, M1
Chyrek-Borowska, S2
Svensson, C1
Enander, I1
Bronsky, E2
Boggs, P2
Findlay, S1
Gawchik, S1
Georgitis, J2
Mansmann, H1
Sholler, L1
Wolfe, J1
Meltzer, E2
Morris, R1
Buscaglia, S2
Catrullo, A2
Marchesi, E3
Tarchalska-Kryńska, B1
Zawisza, E1
Lee, ST1
Amin, MJ1
Bahmer, FA1
Chervinsky, P3
Banov, C1
Vande Souwe, R1
Greenstein, S1
Dolovich, J2
Moote, DW1
Mazza, JA1
Clermont, A1
PetitClerc, C1
Vuurman, EF1
van Veggel, LM1
Uiterwijk, MM1
Leutner, D1
O'Hanlon, JF1
Jordana, G1
Drouin, MA1
Gold, M1
Robson, R1
Stepner, N1
Yang, W1
Weiler, JM2
Widlitz, MD2
Nielsen, L1
Johnsen, CR1
Mosbech, H1
Malling, HJ1
Kroczyńska-Bednarek, J1
Gondorowicz, K1
Kalinowska-Graczyk, M1
Grzelewska-Rzymowska, I1
Rozniecki, J1
Hebert, JR1
Nolop, K1
Lutsky, BN1
Frossard, N2
Lacronique, J2
Melac, M2
Benabdesselam, O2
Braun, JJ1
Glasser, N2
Pauli, G3
Géhanno, P1
Desfougeres, JL1
Clark, RH1
Gervais, P1
Campbell, A1
Chanal, I2
Czarlewski, W3
Michel, FB5
Pronzato, C1
Ricca, V1
Aaronson, D1
Beaucher, W1
Berkowitz, R2
Chen, R1
Cohen, R1
Fourre, J1
Grossman, J2
Pedinoff, A1
Stricker, W1
Wanderer, A1
Pospelova, RA1
Akimova, LG1
Kolganova, NA1
Zlatinskaia, GR1
Serra, HA1
Alves, O1
Rizzo, LF1
Devoto, FM1
Ascierto, H1
Briscoe, M2
Cerqueti, P1
Tosca, M1
Fiorino, N1
Cougnard, J2
van Bavel, JH1
Martin, BG1
Hampel, FC1
Rogenes, PR1
Westlund, RE1
Bowers, BW1
Cook, CK1
Rihoux, JP1
Donnelly, F1
Burtin, B1
Kane, KY1
Ellis, MR1
Juniper, EF2
Kaiser, HB2
Banov, CH2
Berkowitz, RR1
Bernstein, DI1
Bronsky, EA2
Georgitis, JW2
Mendelson, LM1
Rooklin, AR1
Sholler, LJ1
Stricker, WW1
Harrison, JE1
Danzig, MR1
Lorber, RR1
Gawchik, SM1
Lim, J2
Persi, L1
Tisserand, B1
Stone, BD1
Kósa, L1
Fineman, SM1
Lieberman, P1
Miles, RM1
McFadden, EA1
Gungor, A1
Ng, B1
Mamikoglu, B1
Corey, J1
Kaliner, M1
Weiler, J1
Malmstrom, K1
Prenner, BM2
Wei, LX1
Weinstein, SF1
Wolfe, JD1
Condemi, J1
Schulz, R1
Lim, JC1
Georges, GC1
Gates, D1
Scharf, M1
Greiding, L1
Ramon, F1
Heithoff, K1
Herron, JM1
Banfield, C1
Padhi, D1
Affrime, MB1
Simons, FE2
Johnston, L1
Simons, KJ1
Foresi, A1
Capano, D1
Geha, RS1
McCormick, DR1
McClellan, K1
Jarvis, B1
Doggrell, SA1
Schenkel, E1
Kaszuba, SM1
Haney, L1
Chapman, D1
Kramer, B1
Frantz, J1
Orr, LC1
Coutie, WJ1
Pullerits, T1
Praks, L1
Ristioja, V1
Lötvall, J1
Stübner, UP1
Small, P1
Boner, AL2
Richelli, C2
Castellani, C1
Andreoli, A2
Herman, D1
Arnaud, A1
Dry, J1
Latil, G1
Perrin-Fayolle, M1
Vervloet, D1
Lisiecka, MZ1
Frølund, L3
Jäger, S1
Berger, U1
Olsen, OT1
Nüchel Petersen, L1
Høi, L1
Lorentzen, KA1
Hindberg Rasmussen, W1
Svendsen, UG1
Iudice, A1
Ruffoni, S1
Baumgarten, C1
Pipkorn, U1
Katelaris, C1
Irander, K1
Odkvist, LM1
Ohlander, B1
Lebel, B1
Morel, A1
Storms, WW1
Bodman, SF1
Dockhorn, RJ2
Jarmoszuk, I1
Zeitz, HJ1
McGeady, SJ1
Pinnas, JL1
Clissold, SP1
Sorkin, EM1
Goa, KL1
Lanier, BQ1
Linzmayer, MI1
Moss, BA1
Selner, JC1
Miglioranzi, P1
Del Carpio, J2
Kabbash, L1
Turenne, Y2
Prevost, M2
Hebert, J2
Bedard, PM1
Nedilski, M1
Gutkowski, A2
Schulz, J2
Bruttmann, G1
Pedrali, P1
Weeke, B1
Wolff, HH1
Christophers, E1
Bedard, P1
Yeadon, C1
Oei, HD1
Bergner, A1
Connell, JT1
Falliers, CJ1
Grabiec, SV1
Shellenberger, MK1
Skassa-Brociek, W1
Montes, F1
Verdier, M1
Schwab, D1
Lherminier, M1
Schultze-Wernighaus, G1

Clinical Trials (19)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Once Daily and Desloratadine 5 mg for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis[NCT01108783]Phase 3720 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Quality of Life in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis: a Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Bilastine Versus Loratadine[NCT02513290]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Multicentre, International, Adaptive, Open-label, Repeated Administration Pharmacokinetic Study of Bilastine in Children From 2 to <12 Years of Age With Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis or Chronic Urticaria[NCT01081574]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover, Single-center Study to Evaluate the Anti-allergic and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Multiple Doses of Desloratadine on Conjunctival Allergen Challenge-induced Ocular Signs and Symptoms[NCT00311844]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-01Completed
Study of the Decongestant Effect of the Combination of Loratadine and Montelukast Compared With Placebo in SAR Subjects Exposed to Pollen in an Environmental Exposure Unit[NCT00423995]Phase 3379 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-01Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter/Multinational, Efficacy and Safety Study of Desloratadine 5 mg in the Treatment of Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis Who Meet the Criteria for Intermittent Allergic Rhinitis (IAR)[NCT00406783]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised Comparison Of The Effects Of Desloratadine (Aerius®) And Placebo In The Relief Of Nasal Symptom Scores In Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Sar) To Cypress Pollen[NCT00867191]Phase 4233 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-01Completed
Effectiveness of Montelukast Versus Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis Among Children 02 to 05 Years of Age[NCT04957927]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-12Recruiting
Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Related Pruritus: A Prospective, Randomized Control, Double-blinded, Phase II Clinical Trial[NCT02646020]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter/Multinational, Efficacy and Safety Study of Desloratadine 5 mg in the Treatment of Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis Who Meet the Criteria for Persistent Allergic Rhinitis (PER)[NCT00405964]Phase 3716 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Prescription Methods Assessment Project (PMAP)[NCT00393653]800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated (stopped due to Funding ended early)
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
Nasal Ocular Reflexes Contribute to Eye Symptoms in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00117832]20 participants Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Over a 4-Week Treatment Period-Fall 2001[NCT00963469]Phase 31,079 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Desloratadine Syrup in Children Suffering From Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Intermittent Asthma[NCT00805324]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Leukotriene D4 Nasal Provocation Test: Rationale, Methodology, Diagnostic Value and Its Impact on Airway Inflammation in Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Asthma[NCT01963741]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Comparative Efficacy of an Azelastine/Fluticasone Combination Nasal Spray vs. Twice the Dose of Fluticasone in Persistent Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00845598]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn (stopped due to Could not get IMP)
As Needed Versus Regular Use of Intranasal Corticosteroid in Children With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT05299086]68 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-04Recruiting
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Combination Montelukast/Loratadine in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Fall Study[NCT00963599]Phase 3907 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire-Standardized Version (RQLQ-S) at the Final Visit

The RQLQ-S questionnaire consists of 28 questions grouped into 7 domains. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (not troubled with symptoms) to 6 (extremely troubled with symptoms). The total RQLQ-S score is the average score of the 28 questions which consisted of a total of 7 domains. (NCT00406783)
Timeframe: 15 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet-1.1
Placebo Tablet-0.73

Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire-Standardized Version (RQLQ-S: BASELINE

The RQLQ-S questionnaire consists of 28 questions grouped into 7 domains. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (not troubled with symptoms) to 6 (extremely troubled with symptoms). The total RQLQ-S score is the average score of the 28 questions which consisted of a total of 7 domains. (NCT00406783)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet2.96
Placebo Tablet2.80

The Change From Baseline in the 12-hour AM/PM-PRIOR (Reflective) Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS) From Subject Daily Diaries Averaged Over Treatment Days 1 to 15

AM/PM is the average of separate morning (AM) and evening (PM) evaluations. T5SS = the sum of the individual scores for nasal congestion/stuffiness, sneezing, rhinorrhea/nasal discharge, nasal pruritis, and ocular pruritis. Each individual symptom/sign was scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT00406783)
Timeframe: 15 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet-3.01
Placebo Tablet-2.13

Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS) - Average AM/PM PRIOR (Reflective) 12 Hours Diary: BASELINE

AM/PM is the average of separate morning (AM) and evening (PM) evaluations. T5SS = the sum of the individual scores for nasal congestion/stuffiness, sneezing, rhinorrhea/nasal discharge, nasal pruritis, and ocular pruritis. Each individual symptom/sign was scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT00406783)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet8.5
Placebo Tablet8.33

Change From Baseline in Participant's AM/PM PRIOR T5SS Over Days 1 to 85 of Treatment

AM/PM PRIOR (the participant's status over previous 12 hours) T5SS from the participant's daily diary averaged over treatment Days 1 to 85. AM/PM is the average of separate AM and PM evaluations. Scores were defined for T5SS as 0: no symptoms to 15: all severe symptoms. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment and site effects was used to examine the treatment difference. (NCT00405964)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-85

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineDays 1-85
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet9.63-4.50
Placebo Tablet9.55-3.61

Change From Baseline in Participant's AM/PM PRIOR Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS) Over Days 1 to 29 of Treatment

AM/PM PRIOR (the participant's status over previous 12 hours) T5SS from the participant's daily diary averaged over treatment Days 1 to 29. AM/PM is the average of separate morning (AM) and evening (PM) evaluations. Scores were defined for T5SS as 0: no symptoms to 15: all severe symptoms. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment and site effects was used to examine the treatment difference. (NCT00405964)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-29

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineDays 1-29
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet9.63-3.76
Placebo Tablet9.55-2.87

Change From Baseline in the Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire-Standarized Version (RQLQ-S) After 29 Days of Treatment

The RQLQ-S was only completed for participants above 18 years of age. The RQLQ-S was not available for participants 12 to 17 years of age. This questionnaire asked questions pertaining to daily activities, sleep, non-nose eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scale went from 0 (not troubled) to 6 (extremely troubled). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment and site effects was used to examine the treatment difference. (NCT00405964)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 29

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineDay 29
5-mg Desloratadine Tablet3.30-1.35
Placebo Tablet3.15-0.95

Change From Baseline in Other Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.24
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.14

Change From Baseline in Runny Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.52
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.29

Change From Baseline in Sneezing Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.22
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.25

Change From Baseline in Stuffy Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.41
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.47

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-1.66
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-2.21

Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Composite Symptoms Scores were computed as the average of Daytime Nasal Scores [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)] and Nighttime Symptoms Scores [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.21
Montelukast-0.30
Loratadine-0.36

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores.~Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Montelukast-0.28
Loratadine-0.33

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.~Patients were asked to rate each nasal symptom of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4- point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Montelukast-0.33
Loratadine-0.45

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score.~Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)], and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Montelukast-0.28
Loratadine-0.25

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activity,sleep,non-nose/eye symptoms,practical problems,nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.55
Montelukast-0.85
Loratadine-0.85

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the patient, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: After first 2 weeks of treatment

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.73
Montelukast2.43
Loratadine2.30

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the physician, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: After first 2 weeks of treatment

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.75
Montelukast2.36
Loratadine2.38

Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms)

Composite Symptoms scores were computed as the average of the Daytime Nasal Symptoms scores and Nighttime Symptoms scores collected on a 4 point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.2
Montelukast-0.40
Loratadine-0.41
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.45

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.14
Montelukast-0.35
Loratadine-0.38
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.41

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Congestion Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Congestion daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.19
Montelukast-0.41
Loratadine-0.39
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.43

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Itching Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Nasal Itching daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.49
Loratadine-0.56
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.62

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.48
Loratadine-0.52
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.58

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Rhinorrhea Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Rhinorrhea daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.25
Montelukast-0.53
Loratadine-0.51
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.59

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Sneezing Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.46
Loratadine-0.59
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.67

Mean Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening

Patients were asked to rate the symptom of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.15
Montelukast-0.35
Loratadine-0.30
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.32

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)), and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.12
Montelukast-0.29
Loratadine-0.26
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.28

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score

Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, 28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, emotional. Scores per domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.80
Montelukast-1.09
Loratadine-1.06
Montelukast/Loratadine-1.16

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.37
Montelukast2.10
Loratadine2.00
Montelukast/Loratadine1.92

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.35
Montelukast2.13
Loratadine2.05
Montelukast/Loratadine1.99

Reviews

34 reviews available for loratadine and Hay Fever

ArticleYear
[Meta-analysis of leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast in the treatment of allergic rhinitis].
    Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery, 2014, Volume: 49, Issue:8

    Topics: Acetates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Loratadine; Nos

2014
Treatment effect of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and pharmacotherapies for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: Pooled analyses.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2016, Volume: 138, Issue:4

    Topics: Ambrosia; Anti-Allergic Agents; Humans; Loratadine; Mometasone Furoate; Phleum; Rhinitis, Allergic,

2016
Desloratadine and pseudoephedrine combination therapy as a comprehensive treatment for allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2009, Volume: 5, Issue:6

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratad

2009
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cetirizine; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; His

2009
Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Chronic Disease; Female; Germany; Histamine

2010
The effectiveness of levocetirizine in comparison with loratadine in treatment of allergic rhinitis--a meta-analysis.
    Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology, 2011, Volume: 60, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Rhinitis, Aller

2011
Impact and modulation of nasal obstruction.
    Allergy, 2002, Volume: 57 Suppl 75

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Top

2002
Advances in allergy management.
    Allergy, 2002, Volume: 57 Suppl 75

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Quality of

2002
Desloratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2003, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Child; Female; Half-Life; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; L

2003
[The place of new antihistamines in allergy management. Apropos of desloratadine].
    Allergie et immunologie, 2002, Volume: 34, Issue:10

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Half-Life; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine Release; H

2002
Desloratadine for allergic rhinitis.
    American family physician, 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 68, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Histamine H1 Anta

2003
Anti-inflammatory properties of desloratadine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Cell Adhesion; Cytokines; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Models, Immuno

2004
[Oral second generation antihistamines in allergic rhinitis].
    Laryngo- rhino- otologie, 2005, Volume: 84, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cont

2005
Management of seasonal allergic rhinitis: comparative efficacy of the newer-generation prescription antihistamines.
    Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2005, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Child; Child, Preschool; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antag

2005
A review of the evidence from comparative studies of levocetirizine and desloratadine for the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2005, Volume: 27, Issue:7

    Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Nose; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Randomize

2005
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg and placebo in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2005, Volume: 138, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Butyrophenones; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Mul

2005
Review of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria and allergic inflammatory disorders.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2005, Volume: 6, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Child; Child, Preschool; Chronic Disease; Cl

2005
The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.
    Drug safety, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:12

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Ran

2005
A review of the evidence from comparative studies of levocetirizine and desloratadine for the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 28, Issue:1

    Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Piperazines; Retrospective S

2006
Adult and paediatric poor metabolisers of desloratadine: an assessment of pharmacokinetics and safety.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2006, Volume: 5, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Histamine

2006
Efficacy and central nervous system impairment of newer-generation prescription antihistamines in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Southern medical journal, 2006, Volume: 99, Issue:6

    Topics: Central Nervous System; Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating

2006
Selecting the optimal oral antihistamine for patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Drugs, 2006, Volume: 66, Issue:18

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Cardiovascular System; Central Nervous System; Cetirizine; Drug Interactions;

2006
Desloratadine treatment for intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis: a review.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:9

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of

2007
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008, Volume: 47, Issue:4

    Topics: Cetirizine; Drug Interactions; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis,

2008
Topical levocabastine--an effective alternative to oral antihistamines in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1995, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; D

1995
A comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of intranasal fluticasone propionate and antihistamines in the treatment of rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2000, Volume: 55 Suppl 62

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Clinical

2000
Decongestant efficacy of desloratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2001, Volume: 56 Suppl 65

    Topics: Chemotaxis, Leukocyte; Cholinergic Antagonists; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Lorat

2001
Desloratadine activity in concurrent seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma.
    Allergy, 2001, Volume: 56 Suppl 65

    Topics: Asthma; Cholinergic Antagonists; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Respirat

2001
Triamcinolone: new and old indications.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2001, Volume: 2, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aerosols; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rh

2001
Clinical evidence for antileukotriene therapy in the management of allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:4 Suppl 1

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Hista

2002
Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 1991, Volume: 1, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Rhinitis, All

1991
H1-receptor antagonist treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1990, Volume: 86, Issue:6 Pt 2

    Topics: Astemizole; Benzhydryl Compounds; Benzimidazoles; Cetirizine; Chlorpheniramine; Clemastine; Cyprohep

1990
Three new non-sedative antihistamines: worth keeping an eye open for.
    Drug and therapeutics bulletin, 1990, May-14, Volume: 28, Issue:10

    Topics: Cetirizine; Cyproheptadine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hydroxyzine; Loratadine; Rhinitis, All

1990
Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.
    Drugs, 1989, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Common Cold; Cyproheptadine; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennia

1989

Trials

146 trials available for loratadine and Hay Fever

ArticleYear
Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2019, Volume: 180, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Cedrus; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists

2019
Randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetirizine and loratadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy and asthma proceedings, 2017, May-01, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Child; Female; Headache; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Pharyngitis; Rh

2017
[The effect of combined therapy on seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, 2016, Jul-05, Volume: 30, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukotriene An

2016
Combination therapy with montelukast and loratadine alleviates pharyngolaryngeal symptoms related to seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2019, Volume: 7, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cryptomeria; Cyclopropanes; Double-Bli

2019
Protective efficacy of sunglasses on the conjunctival symptoms of seasonal rhinitis.
    International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2013, Volume: 3, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Eye Protective Devices; Femal

2013
Tap water nasal irrigation in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized double-blind study.
    European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2014, Volume: 271, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Drinking Water; Female; Histamine H1 Antagoni

2014
Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei LP-33 in allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (GA2LEN Study).
    European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014, Volume: 68, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Dietary Supplements; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Histamine Antagonis

2014
[The investigation of efficacy and safety of Aerius to seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, 2008, Volume: 22, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine

2008
Clinical and biochemical effects of a combination botanical product (ClearGuard) for allergy: a pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    Nutrition journal, 2008, Jul-14, Volume: 7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bidens; Cinnamomum zeylanicum; Cross-Over Studies; Do

2008
[The effect of desloratadine on quality of life of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, 2008, Volume: 22, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Lora

2008
Quality of life in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis treated with montelukast alone or in combination with levocetirizine or desloratadine.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2008, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cetirizine; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; D

2008
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Benzimidazoles; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related

2009
[Observation on cardiovascular safety of loratadine in treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, 2008, Volume: 22, Issue:23

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Heart Rate; Histamine H1 Antagonists,

2008
Evaluation of desloratadine on conjunctival allergen challenge-induced ocular symptoms.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2009, Volume: 39, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relat

2009
Efficacy of loratadine-montelukast on nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure unit.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Ambrosia; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents;

2009
[Clinical research of Ibudilast on treating the steroid resistant allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Human

2009
Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug The

2009
Efficacy of desloratadine in intermittent allergic rhinitis: a GA(2)LEN study.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male

2009
Desloratadine for the treatment of cypress pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2009, Volume: 103, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Antigens, Plant; Cupressus; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; France; Histami

2009
Clinical studies of combination montelukast and loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2009, Volume: 46, Issue:9

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Beclomethasone; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Me

2009
Onset of action of loratadine/montelukast in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients exposed to grass pollen.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 2010, Volume: 60, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Dou

2010
Efficacy of desloratadine in persistent allergic rhinitis - a GA²LEN study.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2010, Volume: 153, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Disease Progression; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Human

2010
Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2011, Volume: 127, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Chemokines; Cross-Over Studies;

2011
Efficacy of intranasal steroid spray (mometasone furoate) on treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: comparison with oral corticosteroids.
    Auris, nasus, larynx, 2013, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Betamethasone;

2013
24-hour efficacy of once-daily desloratadine therapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis [ISRCTN32042139].
    BMC family practice, 2002, Aug-05, Volume: 3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug A

2002
Single-patient drug trial methodology for allergic rhinitis.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2002, Volume: 36, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Chlorpheniramine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Da

2002
A comparative study of the side effects between pseudoephedrine in Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables and loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet in treatment of allergic rhinitis in Thai patients.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2002, Volume: 85, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Ephedrine; Female; Histamine

2002
Effects of fexofenadine and desloratadine on subjective and objective measures of nasal congestion in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2002, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Air Pollutants; Allergens; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Environmental Exposure; F

2002
Desloratadine reduces allergen challenge-induced mucinous secretion and plasma exudation in allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 89, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; alpha-Macroglobulins; Betula; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method;

2002
Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 89, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamin

2002
Efficacy of ebastine in the control of nasal congestion associated with allergic rhinitis.
    Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Ambrosia; Butyrophenones; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hist

2003
Comparative effects of desloratadine versus montelukast on asthma symptoms and use of beta 2-agonists in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2003, Volume: 130, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthm

2003
Comparison of the effects of desloratadine 5-mg daily and placebo on nasal airflow and seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms induced by grass pollen exposure.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Environmental Exposure

2003
Fluticasone nasal spray and the combination of loratadine and montelukast in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery, 2003, Volume: 129, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Montelukast as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2003, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Cyclopropane

2003
The effects of histamine and leukotriene receptor antagonism on nasal mannitol challenge in allergic rhinitis.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 55, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Diuretics, Osmotic; Double-Blind Method; Histami

2003
[Multicenter study of the effectiveness and tolerability of desloratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Orvosi hetilap, 2003, May-25, Volume: 144, Issue:21

    Topics: Adult; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Rhinit

2003
Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo
    Clinical therapeutics, 2003, Volume: 25, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Double-Bl

2003
Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in patients with an unsatisfactory response to loratadine.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 91, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Double-Blind Method; Dru

2003
The effects of montelukast on intradermal wheal and flare.
    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2003, Volume: 129, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Candida albicans; Cyclopropanes; Double-Bli

2003
A comparison of the effect of diphenhydramine and desloratadine on vigilance and cognitive function during treatment of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 91, Issue:4

    Topics: Allergens; Ambrosia; Anti-Allergic Agents; Arousal; Cognition; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2003
Comparison of the combinations of fexofenadine-pseudoephedrine and loratadine-montelukast in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2004, Volume: 92, Issue:1

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Ambrosia; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Dru

2004
Improvements in simulated real-world relevant performance for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: impact of desloratadine.
    Allergy, 2004, Volume: 59, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Decision Making; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 An

2004
Efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2004, Volume: 133, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Butyrophenones; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonist

2004
Comparison of the effects of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine on daytime alertness and performance in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2004, Volume: 92, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents;

2004
Comparative clinical efficacy, onset and duration of action of levocetirizine and desloratadine for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in subjects evaluated in the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU).
    International journal of clinical practice, 2004, Volume: 58, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists

2004
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, comparing the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (20 and 10 mg), a new PAF and H1 receptor-specific histamine antagonist, to loratadine 10 mg in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Cyproheptadine; Dose-Respo

2004
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Butyrophenones; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-B

2004
Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inter

2004
A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC).
    Current medical research and opinion, 2004, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Environmental Exposure; Female; Histamine H1 An

2004
[Clinical examination of mizolastine in the seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, 2004, Volume: 18, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzimidazoles; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Male;

2004
Evidence of desloratadine syrup efficacy and tolerability in children with pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2005, Volume: 60, Issue:3

    Topics: Child; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Pollen; Rhinitis, A

2005
Safety of desloratadine syrup in children.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2004, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiograp

2004
Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 94, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Ephedrine; Female; Histamine

2005
The efficacy of short-term administration of 3 antihistamines vs placebo under natural exposure to Japanese cedar pollen.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 94, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cryptomeria; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine

2005
[The effect of antianaphylaxis drugs on specific IgE and eosinophil in serum of patients with allergic rhinitis].
    Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, 2005, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Cyclopropanes; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans;

2005
Desloratadine reduces systemic allergic inflammation following nasal provocation in allergic rhinitis and asthma patients.
    Allergy, 2005, Volume: 60, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Asthma; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Inflammation; Loratadine; Mal

2005
The effect of desloratadine on eosinophil/basophil progenitors and other inflammatory markers in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a placebo-controlled randomized study.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2005, Volume: 138, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Basophils; Cytokines; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating

2005
Azelastine nasal spray and desloratadine tablets in pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pharmacodynamic study of onset of action and efficacy.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2006, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonist

2006
Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 96, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Demography; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Lora

2006
The effect of 4 weeks treatment with desloratadine (5mg daily) on levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, IL-18 and TGF beta in patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Histamine H1 Antagon

2007
Efficacy of diphenhydramine vs desloratadine and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 96, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2006
Do the leukotriene receptor antagonists work in children with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis?
    Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2006, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetates; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Area Under Curve; Child; Cross-Over Studies;

2006
Multiple daily administrations of low-dose sublingual immunotherapy in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis, A

2006
Once-daily sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy improves quality of life in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a double-blind, randomised study.
    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2007, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Conjunctivitis

2007
The effect of regular versus on-demand desloratadine treatment in children with allergic rhinitis.
    International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2007, Volume: 71, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Albuterol; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchoconstrictor Agents; Bronchodilator Agents;

2007
Desloratadine improves quality of life and symptom severity in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2007, Volume: 62, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male

2007
Effectiveness of desloratadine 5 mg once daily in patients with symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a Canadian multicenter, open-label trial.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Allergic Agents; Canada; Child;

2007
An open-label, investigator-masked, crossover study of the ocular drying effects of two antihistamines, topical epinastine and systemic loratadine, in adult volunteers with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzazep

2007
[The effect of desloratadine on use of rescue beta2-agonists and symptoms in patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma].
    Polski merkuriusz lekarski : organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego, 2005, Volume: 18, Issue:104

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Broncho

2005
Nasal challenge with allergen leads to maxillary sinus inflammation.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2008, Volume: 121, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Albumins; Ambrosia; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophil

2008
Clinical benefits of combination treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine vs monotherapy with mometasone furoate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2008, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Double-Blind Metho

2008
[The effect of loratadine on skin and bronchial reactivity and histamine liberation from basophils in patients with atopic asthma and allergic rhinitis].
    Pneumonologia i alergologia polska, 1994, Volume: 62, Issue:11-12

    Topics: Asthma; Basophils; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Histamine; Histamine Release; Humans; Loratadine; Rh

1994
Loratadine reduces allergen-induced mucosal output of alpha 2-macroglobulin and tryptase in allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1995, Volume: 96, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; alpha-Macroglobulins; Cell Count; Chymases; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-R

1995
Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1995, Volume: 96, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; E

1995
Loratadine in the treatment of cough associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1995, Volume: 75, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Allergens; Conjunctivitis; Cough; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Pollen

1995
Topical levocabastine compared with oral loratadine for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Swedish GP Allergy Team.
    Allergy, 1994, Volume: 49, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Conjunctivitis, Al

1994
[Test for efficacy of cetirizine and loratadine as a treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis in a 6 week cross-over comparative study].
    Pneumonologia i alergologia polska, 1994, Volume: 62, Issue:11-12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Conjunctivitis; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male;

1994
Efficacy and safety of loratadine compared with astemizole in Malaysian patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Singapore medical journal, 1994, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Astemizole; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Loratadine; Malaysia; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Time Fa

1994
[Loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology, 1994, Volume: 48, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle A

1994
Once daily loratadine versus astemizole once daily.
    Annals of allergy, 1994, Volume: 73, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Astemizole; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double

1994
Efficacy of loratadine versus placebo in the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, 1994, Volume: 73, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine

1994
Seasonal allergic rhinitis and antihistamine effects on children's learning.
    Annals of allergy, 1993, Volume: 71, Issue:2

    Topics: Child; Cognition; Diphenhydramine; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Learning; Loratadine

1993
Intranasal fluticasone propionate versus loratadine in the treatment of adolescent patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1996, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Double-Blind Me

1996
Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1996, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle

1996
Antihistamine premedication in specific cluster immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1996, Volume: 97, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonist

1996
[Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and the influence of loratadine and beclomethasone on this hyperresponsiveness].
    Pneumonologia i alergologia polska, 1996, Volume: 64, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Beclomethasone; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Female; Humans;

1996
Once-daily mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (Nasonex) in seasonal allergic rhinitis: an active- and placebo-controlled study.
    Allergy, 1996, Volume: 51, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents;

1996
Onset of action in the nasal antihistaminic effect of cetirizine and loratadine in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 1997, Volume: 52, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Animals; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hist

1997
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with oral loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 1997, Volume: 52, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Alle

1997
Onset of action and efficacy of terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1997, Volume: 79, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Astemizole; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Environmental

1997
Reduction of soluble ICAM-1 levels in nasal secretion by H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 1997, Volume: 52, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Albumins; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Epithelial Cells; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans

1997
Loratadine treatment of rhinitis due to pollen allergy reduces epithelial ICAM-1 expression.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1997, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Proteins; Cetirizine; Eosinophil Granule Proteins; Eosinophil Peroxidase; E

1997
Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1997, Volume: 100, Issue:6 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; E

1997
Loratadine-pseudoephedrine in children with allergic rhinitis, a controlled double-blind trial.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Allergic Agents; Argentina; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-O

1998
Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1998, Volume: 101, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Double-Blin

1998
Loratadine reduces the expression of ICAM-1.
    Allergy, 1998, Volume: 53, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Conjunctiva; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Double-Blind Method;

1998
Changes in skin-test reactivity do not correlate with clinical efficacy of H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 1998, Volume: 53, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; Astemizole; Child; Conjunctiva; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doub

1998
A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of family practice, 1998, Volume: 47, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Doubl

1998
Comparative efficacy and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combinations versus placebo in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    American journal of therapeutics, 1998, Volume: 5, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Delayed-Action Preparati

1998
Nasal effect of cetirizine and loratadine at 24 hours in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    American journal of therapeutics, 1998, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female

1998
Comparison of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide with oral loratadine in the treatment of seasonal ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.
    The American journal of managed care, 1997, Volume: 3, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Age

1997
Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1999, Volume: 103, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female;

1999
Double-blind trials of azelastine nasal spray monotherapy versus combination therapy with loratadine tablets and beclomethasone nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Rhinitis Study Groups.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1999, Volume: 82, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Child

1999
Loratadine/pseudoephedrine for nasal symptoms in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2000, Volume: 79, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule;

2000
Onset-of-action for antihistamine and decongestant combinations during an outdoor challenge.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2000, Volume: 84, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Air Pollutants; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Ephe

2000
Concomitant montelukast and loratadine as treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2000, Volume: 105, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; F

2000
Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray versus loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: efficacy and quality of life.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2000, Volume: 84, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents,

2000
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine H1 An

2000
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine H1 An

2000
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine H1 An

2000
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine H1 An

2000
Comparison of once-daily ebastine 20 mg, ebastine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The Ebastine Study Group.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2000, Volume: 105, Issue:6 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Butyrophenones; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonist

2000
Loratadine versus cetirizine: assessment of somnolence and motivation during the workday.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2000, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Eff

2000
The pharmacokinetics, electrocardiographic effects, and tolerability of loratadine syrup in children aged 2 to 5 years.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2000, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Biological Availability; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administr

2000
Clinical pharmacology of the H1-receptor antagonists cetirizine and loratadine in children.
    Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2000, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1 Antag

2000
Efficacy and tolerability of loratadine versus fexofenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a double-blind comparison with crossover treatment of nonresponders.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2000, Volume: 22, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Femal

2000
Children's school performance is not impaired by short-term administration of diphenhydramine or loratadine.
    The Journal of pediatrics, 2001, Volume: 138, Issue:5

    Topics: Child; Diphenhydramine; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Learning; Loratadine; Male; Rhinit

2001
Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2001, Volume: 56, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Circadian Rhythm; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Met

2001
Superiority of an intranasal corticosteroid compared with an oral antihistamine in the as-needed treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2001, Nov-26, Volume: 161, Issue:21

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Anti-Alle

2001
Comparative onset of action and symptom relief with cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in an environmental exposure unit in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: confirmation of a test system.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2001, Volume: 87, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Lorata

2001
A comparison of once daily fexofenadine versus the combination of montelukast plus loratadine on domiciliary nasal peak flow and symptoms in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2002, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug

2002
Comparison of a nasal glucocorticoid, antileukotriene, and a combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Androstadienes; Circadian Rhythm; Cyclopropanes; Double

2002
Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 88, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Comb

2002
Suppression of epicutaneous reactivity by terfenadine and loratadine.
    Annals of allergy, 1992, Volume: 68, Issue:1

    Topics: Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Lor

1992
Comparison of the effects of loratadine and astemizole in the treatment of children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Allergy, 1992, Volume: 47, Issue:2 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Astemizole; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cyproheptadine; Female; Histamine Antagonis

1992
[Clinical effectiveness and tolerance of loratadine versus cetirizine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Allergie et immunologie, 1992, Volume: 24, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Rhinitis,

1992
[Loratadine in hay fever].
    Ugeskrift for laeger, 1992, Oct-05, Volume: 154, Issue:41

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Beclomethasone; Double-Blind Method; Female

1992
Onset and duration of the effects of three antihistamines in current use--astemizole, loratadine and terfenadine forte--studied during prolonged, controlled allergen challenges in volunteers.
    The Journal of international medical research, 1992, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Allergens; Astemizole; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Nasal Mucosa; P

1992
Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1992, Volume: 42, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine;

1992
Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 1991, Volume: 1, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Rhinitis, All

1991
Efficacy of an oral antihistamine, loratadine, as compared with a nasal steroid spray, beclomethasone dipropionate, in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences, 1991, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Beclomethasone; Cyproheptadine; Doubl

1991
Suppressive effect of loratadine on allergen-induced histamine release in the nose.
    Allergy, 1991, Volume: 46, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists;

1991
Comparative effects of loratadine and azatadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology, 1990, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Histami

1990
Treatment of hay fever with loratadine--a new non-sedating antihistamine.
    Allergy, 1990, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Clemastine; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Hum

1990
Antiallergic activity of H1-receptor antagonists assessed by nasal challenge.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1988, Volume: 82, Issue:5 Pt 1

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamin

1988
SCH 434: a new antihistamine/decongestant for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1989, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Cyproheptadine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Drug Com

1989
Loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, 1989, Volume: 63, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Cyproheptadine; Drug Combinations; Ephedrine; Female; Histamine Anta

1989
Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 1989, Volume: 44, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Child; Child, Preschool; Chlorpheniramine; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method

1989
Efficacy and safety of loratadine (10 mg once daily), terfenadine (60 mg twice daily), and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1989, Volume: 84, Issue:5 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Sc

1989
A multicentric study of loratadine, terfenadine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1988, Volume: 38, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyproheptadine; Doub

1988
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of loratadine, terfenadine, and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1988, Volume: 81, Issue:5 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Meth

1988
Double-blind comparison of loratadine (SCH 29851), astemizole, and placebo in hay fever with special regard to onset of action.
    Annals of allergy, 1988, Volume: 61, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Astemizole; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyproheptadine; Dose-Respon

1988
Safety and efficacy of loratadine (Sch-29851): a new non-sedating antihistamine in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, 1987, Volume: 58, Issue:6

    Topics: Capsules; Clemastine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Histamine Antag

1987
Double-blind placebo-controlled study of loratadine, mequitazine, and placebo in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1988, Volume: 81, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyproheptadine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lo

1988
[Disodium cromoglycate in comparison with antihistaminics (loratadine) in seasonal allergic rhinitis].
    Zeitschrift fur Hautkrankheiten, 1988, Volume: 63 Suppl 4

    Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cromolyn Sodium; Cyproheptadine; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Lor

1988

Other Studies

41 other studies available for loratadine and Hay Fever

ArticleYear
Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast.
    Drugs, 2009, Volume: 69, Issue:18

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Astemizole; Ceti

2009
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with desloratadine in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; France; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; L

2010
Ahh-choo! How to sneeze at allergies.
    Consumer reports, 2010, Volume: 75, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Cetirizine; Diphenhydramine; Health Behavior; Health Care Surveys; Histamin

2010
You're the flight surgeon: ear, nose and throat conditions.
    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2011, Volume: 82, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aerospace Medicine; Glucocorticoids; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadi

2011
[Facial angioedema following hyaluronic acid injection].
    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, 2012, Volume: 139, Issue:1

    Topics: Angioedema; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Eruptions; Drug Therapy, Combination

2012
[The result of neglected or erroneous treatment. Mentally handicapped by hay fever].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2002, Jul-11, Volume: 144, Issue:27-28

    Topics: Cognition Disorders; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

2002
Decongestant effects of antihistamines: a class effect?
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2003, Volume: 111, Issue:3

    Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Decongestan

2003
Do leukotriene receptor antagonists have a place in pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis?
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cy

2003
Cc-chemokine eotaxin as a marker of efficacy of specific immunotherapy in patients with intermittent IgE-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Betula; Biomarkers; Chemokines,

2003
[In seasonal and perennial rhinitis. Superiority to standard H1 blockers].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, May-29, Volume: 145, Issue:22

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1 Antagonists; His

2003
[Antihistaminics. Side effects also after raising dosage at the placebo level].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, May-29, Volume: 145, Issue:22

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1

2003
Assessing satisfaction with desloratadine and fexofenadine in allergy patients who report dissatisfaction with loratadine.
    BMC family practice, 2003, Aug-13, Volume: 4

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Patient Satisf

2003
[Respiratory allergies in the child and the adult].
    La Revue du praticien, 2004, Jan-31, Volume: 54, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Ag

2004
[Older antihistaminics often act as sedatives. Hay fever gone -- reaction capacity, too].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, Mar-27, Volume: 145, Issue:13

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Placebos; Rhin

2003
Nasal saline: placebo or drug?
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2004, Volume: 93, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Lora

2004
[Not a minor illness. Hay fever therapy should not be left to the patient].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, Apr-08, Volume: 146, Issue:15

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Alle

2004
[Combination therapy of allergic rhinitis. So that from hay fever asthma won't come].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, May-27, Volume: 146, Issue:22

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Asthma; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Histamine H1 Antago

2004
Desloratadine partially inhibits the augmented bacterial responses in the sinuses of allergic and infected mice.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Cells, Cultured; Colony Count, Microbial; Female; Flow Cytometry; Histamine H

2004
[Nasal obstruction on the decline. Antihistamine allows allergic patients to breathe].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, Jul-08, Volume: 146, Issue:27-28

    Topics: Cholinergic Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; L

2004
Treatment of ear pain in pilots in flight.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 95, Issue:4

    Topics: Aerospace Medicine; Anti-Allergic Agents; Humans; Loratadine; Pain; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; St

2005
Sexual dysfunction in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 95, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Coitus; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Lib

2005
Diphenhydramine vs desloratadine comparisons must consider risk-benefit ratio.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 97, Issue:1

    Topics: Cognition Disorders; Diphenhydramine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedati

2006
Efficacy of nasal corticosteroids alone or combined with antihistamines or montelukast in treatment of allergic rhinitis.
    Auris, nasus, larynx, 2008, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents;

2008
[The influence of desloratadine on course of intermittens allergic rhinitis].
    Polski merkuriusz lekarski : organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego, 2005, Volume: 18, Issue:104

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Disease Progression; Female; H

2005
Inhibition of IgE- and non-IgE-mediated histamine release from human basophil leukocytes in vitro by a histamine H1-antagonist, desethoxycarbonyl-loratadine.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1994, Volume: 93, Issue:2

    Topics: Basophils; Calcimycin; Concanavalin A; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine Release; Humans; Immunogl

1994
Loratadine--a new antihistamine.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 1993, Aug-06, Volume: 35, Issue:902

    Topics: Drug Interactions; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

1993
[Claritin in the combined therapy of bronchial asthma].
    Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 1997, Volume: 69, Issue:10

    Topics: Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Drug Evaluation; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Remiss

1997
The clinical efficacy of H1 antagonists in urticaria and rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1998, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Mathematical Computi

1998
The best therapy for allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of family practice, 1998, Volume: 47, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Hu

1998
Rhinitis management: the patient's perspective.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1998, Volume: 28 Suppl 6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Humans; Loratadine; Pa

1998
Same drug, different outcomes in the environmental exposure unit.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1999, Volume: 103, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Hum

1999
[Evaluation of loretadine therapy by rhino-manometry in patients with allergic rhinitis].
    Orvosi hetilap, 1999, Apr-11, Volume: 140, Issue:15

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Manometry; N

1999
Desloratadine: A new, nonsedating, oral antihistamine.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2001, Volume: 107, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Asthma; Drug Interactions; Histamine H1 Antagonist

2001
Newer antihistamines.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2001, Apr-30, Volume: 43, Issue:1103

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Chlorpheniramine; Conscious Sedation; Diphen

2001
[A new antihistamine. Inhibiting inflammation in rhinorrhea and nasal congestion].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2001, Apr-05, Volume: 143, Issue:14

    Topics: Cholinergic Antagonists; Histamine Release; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

2001
[Seasonal allergic rhinitis. Nasal obstruction can also beh improved].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2001, May-03, Volume: 143, Issue:18

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Loratadine; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nasal O

2001
Desloratadine.
    Drugs, 2001, Volume: 61, Issue:6

    Topics: Asthma; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; R

2001
[The third-generation antihistaminics. Can they prevent the tier change?].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2002, Feb-14, Volume: 144, Issue:7

    Topics: Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Placebos; Randomize

2002
Desloratadine (Clarinex).
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2002, Mar-18, Volume: 44, Issue:1126

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Disorder

2002
Which is more effective for as-needed treatment of seasonal allergy symptoms: intranasal corticosteroids or oral antihistamines?
    The Journal of family practice, 2002, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Androstadienes; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fluticasone; Glu

2002
Loratadine, a non-sedating H1-receptor antagonist (antihistamine)
    Annals of allergy, 1989, Volume: 63, Issue:4

    Topics: Cyproheptadine; Histamine Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis, Aller

1989