Page last updated: 2024-10-30

loratadine and Rhinitis

loratadine has been researched along with Rhinitis in 25 studies

Loratadine: A second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Unlike most classical antihistamines (HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS) it lacks central nervous system depressing effects such as drowsiness.
loratadine : A benzocycloheptapyridine that is 6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine substituted by a chloro group at position 8 and a 1-(ethoxycarbonyl)piperidin-4-ylidene group at position 11. It is a H1-receptor antagonist commonly employed in the treatment of allergic disorders.

Rhinitis: Inflammation of the NASAL MUCOSA, the mucous membrane lining the NASAL CAVITIES.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine sustained release tablet with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis."9.12A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. ( Chang, KP; Chen, YA; Hao, SP; Lin, YS, 2007)
"The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the nonsedating antihistamine, desloratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR)."8.84Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. ( Canonica, GW; Compalati, E; Penagos, M; Tarantini, F, 2007)
"The loratadine treated group had better results both in nasal symptoms, with a decrease in sneezing (P < 0."6.69A controlled study on the effectiveness of loratadine in combination with flunisolide in the treatment of nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES). ( Bagnato, GF; Barresi, L; Gangemi, S; Isola, S; Purello-D'Ambrosio, F; Ricciardi, L, 1999)
" First, we constructed a dose-response curve."5.33Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis causes hyperresponsiveness to histamine challenge in mice. ( Kirtsreesakul, V; Klemens, JJ; Luxameechanporn, T; Naclerio, RM, 2005)
"The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine sustained release tablet with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis."5.12A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. ( Chang, KP; Chen, YA; Hao, SP; Lin, YS, 2007)
"In a double-blind, randomized study 62 patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis received a nasal glucocorticoid (fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray [FPANS], 200 microg/d), an antileukotriene (montelukast, 10 mg/d), a combination of montelukast with an antihistamine (loratadine, 10 mg/d), or placebo throughout the season."5.10Comparison of a nasal glucocorticoid, antileukotriene, and a combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Lötvall, J; Praks, L; Pullerits, T; Ristioja, V, 2002)
"The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the nonsedating antihistamine, desloratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR)."4.84Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. ( Canonica, GW; Compalati, E; Penagos, M; Tarantini, F, 2007)
"Histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are pivotal mast cell mediators which contribute considerably and likely complementary to the symptoms of allergic rhinitis."3.76Concomitant activity of histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes on porcine nasal mucosal vessels and nasal inflammation in the rat. ( Hunter, JC; Jia, Y; Jimenez, J; Lieber, G; McLeod, RL, 2010)
"Sneezing and nasal scratching after challenges were significantly ameliorated in the Shu-Bi-Lin-treated group compared with the ovalbumin-sensitized and untreated group, but rhinorrhea volume was not reduced."3.73Effect of a Chinese herbal formula, Shi-Bi-Lin, on an experimental model of allergic rhinitis. ( Chen, GG; Leung, PC; van Hasselt, CA; Wang, LH; Wong, YO; Woo, JK; Zhao, Y, 2006)
"The loratadine treated group had better results both in nasal symptoms, with a decrease in sneezing (P < 0."2.69A controlled study on the effectiveness of loratadine in combination with flunisolide in the treatment of nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES). ( Bagnato, GF; Barresi, L; Gangemi, S; Isola, S; Purello-D'Ambrosio, F; Ricciardi, L, 1999)
"Loratadine is an especially effective second-generation H1-receptor antagonist and is comparable to many of the other second-generation antihistamines."2.38Loratadine. A review of recent findings in pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, with a look at its use in combination with pseudoephedrine. ( Danzig, MR; Roman, IJ, 1993)
" First, we constructed a dose-response curve."1.33Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis causes hyperresponsiveness to histamine challenge in mice. ( Kirtsreesakul, V; Klemens, JJ; Luxameechanporn, T; Naclerio, RM, 2005)
"Allergic rhinitis is manifested by watery discharge; however its clinical effect on the watery volume in the oral cavity is unknown."1.33Saliva secretion in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Elad, S; Heisler, S; Shalit, M, 2006)

Research

Studies (25)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's5 (20.00)18.2507
2000's16 (64.00)29.6817
2010's3 (12.00)24.3611
2020's1 (4.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Zhang, J1
Kan, D1
Jie, Q1
Kodithuwakku, ND1
Yuan, X1
He, G1
Chen, M1
Xu, S1
Wu, Y1
Lieber, G1
Jimenez, J1
Hunter, JC1
McLeod, RL1
Jia, Y1
Farrokhi, S1
Mousavi, T1
Arshi, S1
Javahertarash, N1
Varasteh, A1
Falak, R1
Rezaei, N1
Salekmoghadam, A1
Wasserman, N1
Andersson, M1
Persson, CG1
Svensson, C1
Cervin-Hoberg, C1
Greiff, L1
Chester, AC1
Passalacqua, G1
Guerra, L1
Compalati, E2
Massacane, P1
Rogkakou, A1
Zanella, C1
Baena-Cagnani, R1
Canonica, GW2
Georgalas, C1
Thomas, K1
Owens, C1
Abramovich, S1
Lack, G1
Klemens, JJ1
Kirtsreesakul, V1
Luxameechanporn, T1
Naclerio, RM1
Zhao, Y1
van Hasselt, CA1
Woo, JK1
Chen, GG1
Wong, YO1
Wang, LH1
Leung, PC1
Elad, S1
Heisler, S1
Shalit, M1
Layton, D1
Wilton, L1
Boshier, A1
Cornelius, V1
Harris, S1
Shakir, SA1
Mullol, J1
Valero, A1
Alobid, I1
Tarantini, F1
Penagos, M1
Chen, YA1
Chang, KP1
Lin, YS1
Hao, SP1
Kiratli, H1
Onder, S1
Yildiz, S1
Ozşeker, H1
Roman, IJ1
Danzig, MR1
Horak, F1
Toth, J1
Hirschwehr, R1
Marks, B1
Stübner, UP1
Jäger, S1
Berger, U1
Schleinzer, K1
Günczler, P1
Wroblewski, BA1
Purello-D'Ambrosio, F1
Isola, S1
Ricciardi, L1
Gangemi, S1
Barresi, L1
Bagnato, GF1
Hansen, GR1
Wilson, AM1
Pullerits, T1
Praks, L1
Ristioja, V1
Lötvall, J1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Other Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.24
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.14

Change From Baseline in Runny Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.52
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.29

Change From Baseline in Sneezing Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.22
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.25

Change From Baseline in Stuffy Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.41
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.47

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-1.66
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-2.21

Reviews

4 reviews available for loratadine and Rhinitis

ArticleYear
Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials.
    Allergy, 2007, Volume: 62, Issue:4

    Topics: Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Loratadine; N

2007
Loratadine. A review of recent findings in pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, with a look at its use in combination with pseudoephedrine.
    Clinical reviews in allergy, 1993,Spring, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ephedrine; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis; Urticaria

1993
Loratadine in the high performance aerospace environment.
    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 1999, Volume: 70, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aerospace Medicine; Anti-Allergic Agents; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Milit

1999
Are antihistamines useful in managing asthma?
    Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Acetates; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Asthma; Bronchospirometry; Cetirizine; Cyclopropa

2002

Trials

7 trials available for loratadine and Rhinitis

ArticleYear
Effects of loratadine on red wine-induced symptoms and signs of rhinitis.
    Acta oto-laryngologica, 2003, Volume: 123, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; alpha-Macroglobulins; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blin

2003
Comparison of the effects in the nose and skin of a single dose of desloratadine and levocetirizine over 24 hours.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2004, Volume: 135, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; M

2004
Comparison of the risk of drowsiness and sedation between levocetirizine and desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England.
    Drug safety, 2006, Volume: 29, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cohort Studies; Conscious Sedation; Drug Monitoring; England; Female; Histamine H

2006
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
    European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2007, Volume: 264, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combin

2007
Effect of continuous allergen challenge on clinical symptoms and mediator release in dust-mite-allergic patients.
    Allergy, 1998, Volume: 53, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antigens, Dermatophagoides; Blood Proteins; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Chymases; Cross-Over

1998
A controlled study on the effectiveness of loratadine in combination with flunisolide in the treatment of nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES).
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1999, Volume: 29, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eosinophilia; Eosin

1999
Comparison of a nasal glucocorticoid, antileukotriene, and a combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Androstadienes; Circadian Rhythm; Cyclopropanes; Double

2002

Other Studies

14 other studies available for loratadine and Rhinitis

ArticleYear
Evaluation of efficiency and safety of combined loratadine and budesonide in patients with anaphylactic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine, 2022, Apr-29, Volume: 101, Issue:17

    Topics: Anaphylaxis; Budesonide; Child; Humans; Loratadine; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Research Design; Rhiniti

2022
Anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory properties of a potent histamine H1 receptor antagonist, desloratadine citrate disodium injection, and its anti-inflammatory mechanism on EA.hy926 endothelial cells.
    European journal of pharmacology, 2015, May-05, Volume: 754

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Capillary Permeability; Cell Survival; Chlo

2015
Best drugs for what ails you: the brands to buy--and those to skip.
    Consumer reports, 2009, Volume: 74, Issue:9

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Anesthetics, Local; Cetirizine; Chlorpheniramine; Common Cold; Cough; Dextromethorpha

2009
Concomitant activity of histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes on porcine nasal mucosal vessels and nasal inflammation in the rat.
    Pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 85, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Animals; Cyclopropanes; Cysteine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Drug T

2010
Effect of treatment with intranasal corticosteroid and oral antihistamine on cytokine profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with allergic rhinitis sensitive to chenopodium album.
    Iranian journal of allergy, asthma, and immunology, 2010, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Allergens; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Chenopodium album; Cyt

2010
Loratadine is viable in patients with geriatric rhinitis.
    Geriatrics, 2002, Volume: 57, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis

2002
Re: Effects of loratadine... by Andersson et al.
    Acta oto-laryngologica, 2004, Volume: 124, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Food Hypersensitivity; Humans; Loratadine; Randomized Co

2004
Medical treatment for rhinosinusitis associated with adenoidal hypertrophy in children: an evaluation of clinical response and changes on magnetic resonance imaging.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 2005, Volume: 114, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenoids; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chil

2005
Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis causes hyperresponsiveness to histamine challenge in mice.
    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery, 2005, Volume: 131, Issue:10

    Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-S

2005
Effect of a Chinese herbal formula, Shi-Bi-Lin, on an experimental model of allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Eosinophils; Guinea Pi

2006
Saliva secretion in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2006, Volume: 141, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Middle Aged; Patient

2006
The nose - from symptoms to evidence-based medicine.
    Allergy, 2007, Volume: 62, Issue:4

    Topics: Conjunctivitis; Evidence-Based Medicine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine;

2007
Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis of the orbit.
    Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Eosinophilic Granuloma; Female; Fibrosis; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Hyp

2008
Antihistamines.
    The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Astemizole; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Rhinitis; Terfenadine

1998