Page last updated: 2024-10-30

loratadine and Nasal Obstruction

loratadine has been researched along with Nasal Obstruction in 29 studies

Loratadine: A second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Unlike most classical antihistamines (HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS) it lacks central nervous system depressing effects such as drowsiness.
loratadine : A benzocycloheptapyridine that is 6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine substituted by a chloro group at position 8 and a 1-(ethoxycarbonyl)piperidin-4-ylidene group at position 11. It is a H1-receptor antagonist commonly employed in the treatment of allergic disorders.

Nasal Obstruction: Any hindrance to the passage of air into and out of the nose. The obstruction may be unilateral or bilateral, and may involve any part of the NASAL CAVITY.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Desloratadine-montelukast combination therapy causes subjective and objective decrease in nasal obstruction, reduces the other symptoms of PAR and improves the disease-specific QoL."9.17Desloratadine-montelukast combination improves quality of life and decreases nasal obstruction in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. ( Cingi, C; Erdogmus, N; Eskiizmir, G; Oghan, F; Ural, A; Yaz, A, 2013)
"When compared with desloratadine and placebo, Ze 339 shows better efficacy in relieving nasal obstruction symptoms and inhibiting critical components of the chemokine network and as such represents a novel symptomatic and possible prophylactic treatment for allergic rhinitis."9.15Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine. ( Chaker, AM; Dumitru, AF; Greve, J; Hess, L; Hindersin, S; Klenzner, T; Nebel, S; Scheckenbach, K; Schmidt-Weber, CB; Shamji, M; Wagenmann, M; Zahner, C; Zimmermann, C, 2011)
"Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <."9.10Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit. ( Harris, AG; Horak, F; Stübner, UP; Zieglmayer, R, 2002)
" Desloratadine therapy significantly reduced nasal and ocular symptom severity, itching and wheals, and sleep and activity disruption (p < 0."8.86Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies. ( Bachert, C; Maurer, M, 2010)
"The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the nonsedating antihistamine, desloratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR)."8.84Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. ( Canonica, GW; Compalati, E; Penagos, M; Tarantini, F, 2007)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."6.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis."6.71Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005)
"Desloratadine-montelukast combination therapy causes subjective and objective decrease in nasal obstruction, reduces the other symptoms of PAR and improves the disease-specific QoL."5.17Desloratadine-montelukast combination improves quality of life and decreases nasal obstruction in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. ( Cingi, C; Erdogmus, N; Eskiizmir, G; Oghan, F; Ural, A; Yaz, A, 2013)
"When compared with desloratadine and placebo, Ze 339 shows better efficacy in relieving nasal obstruction symptoms and inhibiting critical components of the chemokine network and as such represents a novel symptomatic and possible prophylactic treatment for allergic rhinitis."5.15Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine. ( Chaker, AM; Dumitru, AF; Greve, J; Hess, L; Hindersin, S; Klenzner, T; Nebel, S; Scheckenbach, K; Schmidt-Weber, CB; Shamji, M; Wagenmann, M; Zahner, C; Zimmermann, C, 2011)
"Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <."5.10Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit. ( Harris, AG; Horak, F; Stübner, UP; Zieglmayer, R, 2002)
" Desloratadine therapy significantly reduced nasal and ocular symptom severity, itching and wheals, and sleep and activity disruption (p < 0."4.86Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies. ( Bachert, C; Maurer, M, 2010)
"The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the nonsedating antihistamine, desloratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR)."4.84Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. ( Canonica, GW; Compalati, E; Penagos, M; Tarantini, F, 2007)
"Desloratadine treatment for 14 days improved nasal airflow and resistance as well as symptom and QOL scores in patients with symptomatic SAR during the allergy season."2.72Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial. ( Harris, AG; Iezzoni, D; Jalowayski, AA; Meltzer, EO; Vogt, K, 2006)
"Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist recently approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)."2.71Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast. ( Arastu, R; Baidoo, CA; Faris, MA; Howland, WC; Klein, KC; Philpot, EE; Ratner, PH; Rickard, KA, 2003)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."2.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
" No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported."2.71Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Grubbe, R; Lutsky, B; Pleskow, W; Weiss, S, 2005)
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis."2.71Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005)
"Desloratadine is a new treatment option for patients with IAR and nasal congestion."2.70Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis. ( Nayak, AS; Schenkel, E, 2001)
" Recommended dosage of loratadine (CAS 79794-75-5) is 10 mg once daily, whereas terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) until recently has been recommended as 60 mg twice daily."2.67Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow. ( Hindberg Rasmussen, W; Høi, L; Lorentzen, KA; Nüchel Petersen, L; Olsen, OT; Svendsen, UG, 1992)
" Mean reductions in nasal congestion scores were comparable between the once- and twice-daily dosing regimens of the combination drug."2.45Desloratadine and pseudoephedrine combination therapy as a comprehensive treatment for allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion. ( Anolik, R, 2009)
"Fexofenadine was associated with significantly lower nasal congestion scores compared with placebo in 4 studies (P <- 0."2.45A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Bachert, C, 2009)
"Desloratadine treatment was associated with less deterioration from baseline in the mean nasal airflow (P < 0."2.41Impact and modulation of nasal obstruction. ( Horak, F, 2002)

Research

Studies (29)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (3.45)18.2507
2000's22 (75.86)29.6817
2010's5 (17.24)24.3611
2020's1 (3.45)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Zhao, J1
Yan, X1
Gai, J1
Han, J1
Zhang, H1
Luo, H1
Huang, S1
Wang, J1
Liu, X2
Ren, Y1
Yang, H1
Sun, X1
Huang, H1
Cingi, C1
Oghan, F1
Eskiizmir, G1
Yaz, A1
Ural, A1
Erdogmus, N1
Anolik, R2
Grubbe, RE1
Lumry, WR1
Bachert, C2
Holmberg, K1
Tonnel, AB1
Dreyfus, I2
Olsson, P1
Cougnard, J1
Mesbah, K2
Devillier, P1
Demoly, P1
Dhivert-Donnadieu, H1
Maurer, M1
Dumitru, AF1
Shamji, M1
Wagenmann, M1
Hindersin, S1
Scheckenbach, K1
Greve, J1
Klenzner, T1
Hess, L1
Nebel, S1
Zimmermann, C1
Zahner, C1
Schmidt-Weber, CB1
Chaker, AM1
Karaki, M1
Akiyama, K1
Mori, N1
Horak, F2
Van Cauwenberge, P1
Ratner, P1
Hampel, F1
Gispert, J1
Ratner, PH1
Howland, WC1
Arastu, R1
Philpot, EE1
Klein, KC1
Baidoo, CA1
Faris, MA1
Rickard, KA1
Ciprandi, G2
Cirillo, I2
Vizzaccaro, A2
Tosca, MA1
Lee, DK1
Currie, GP1
Pleskow, W1
Grubbe, R1
Weiss, S1
Lutsky, B1
Civardi, E1
Barberi, S1
Allen, M1
Marseglia, GL1
Meltzer, EO1
Jalowayski, AA1
Vogt, K1
Iezzoni, D1
Harris, AG2
Raphael, GD1
Angello, JT1
Wu, MM1
Druce, HM1
Canonica, GW1
Tarantini, F1
Compalati, E1
Penagos, M1
Buczyłko, K1
Chwała, C1
Zielińska-Bliźniewska, H1
Wagner, A1
Dzwonnik, A1
Nayak, AS1
Schenkel, E1
Stübner, UP1
Zieglmayer, R1
Olsen, OT1
Nüchel Petersen, L1
Høi, L1
Lorentzen, KA1
Hindberg Rasmussen, W1
Svendsen, UG1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised Comparison Of The Effects Of Desloratadine (Aerius®) And Placebo In The Relief Of Nasal Symptom Scores In Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Sar) To Cypress Pollen[NCT00867191]Phase 4233 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-01Completed
Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Related Pruritus: A Prospective, Randomized Control, Double-blinded, Phase II Clinical Trial[NCT02646020]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
Effectiveness of Montelukast Versus Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis Among Children 02 to 05 Years of Age[NCT04957927]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-12Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Other Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.24
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.14

Change From Baseline in Runny Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.52
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.29

Change From Baseline in Sneezing Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.22
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.25

Change From Baseline in Stuffy Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.41
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.47

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-1.66
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-2.21

Reviews

6 reviews available for loratadine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
Desloratadine and pseudoephedrine combination therapy as a comprehensive treatment for allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2009, Volume: 5, Issue:6

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratad

2009
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cetirizine; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; His

2009
Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Chronic Disease; Female; Germany; Histamine

2010
Impact and modulation of nasal obstruction.
    Allergy, 2002, Volume: 57 Suppl 75

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Top

2002
Advances in allergy management.
    Allergy, 2002, Volume: 57 Suppl 75

    Topics: Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Quality of

2002
Efficacy of desloratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials.
    Allergy, 2007, Volume: 62, Issue:4

    Topics: Double-Blind Method; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Loratadine; N

2007

Trials

18 trials available for loratadine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
Efficacy of Bimin decoction for patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Trials, 2019, Dec-30, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Loratadine; Male; M

2019
Clinical Efficacy of Vitamin D3 Adjuvant Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Iranian journal of immunology : IJI, 2020, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Adolescent; Adult; Cholecalciferol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eosinophils;

2020
Desloratadine-montelukast combination improves quality of life and decreases nasal obstruction in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.
    International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2013, Volume: 3, Issue:10

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Loratadi

2013
Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug The

2009
Desloratadine relieves nasal congestion and improves quality-of-life in persistent allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2009, Volume: 64, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Male

2009
Desloratadine for the treatment of cypress pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2009, Volume: 103, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Antigens, Plant; Cupressus; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; France; Histami

2009
Petasol butenoate complex (Ze 339) relieves allergic rhinitis-induced nasal obstruction more effectively than desloratadine.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2011, Volume: 127, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Chemokines; Cross-Over Studies;

2011
Efficacy of intranasal steroid spray (mometasone furoate) on treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: comparison with oral corticosteroids.
    Auris, nasus, larynx, 2013, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Betamethasone;

2013
Efficacy of ebastine in the control of nasal congestion associated with allergic rhinitis.
    Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Ambrosia; Butyrophenones; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hist

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with montelukast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Age

2003
Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inter

2004
Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 94, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Ephedrine; Female; Histamine

2005
Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    International immunopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 5, Issue:13-14

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, N

2005
Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 96, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Demography; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Lora

2006
Efficacy of diphenhydramine vs desloratadine and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2006, Volume: 96, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Child; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method; Female;

2006
Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis.
    Allergy, 2001, Volume: 56, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Circadian Rhythm; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Met

2001
Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine

2002
Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1992, Volume: 42, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Loratadine;

1992

Other Studies

5 other studies available for loratadine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
[Modern antihistaminics against allergic rhinitis. Better breathing without side effects].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, Oct-30, Volume: 145, Issue:44

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruct

2003
[Nasal obstruction on the decline. Antihistamine allows allergic patients to breathe].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, Jul-08, Volume: 146, Issue:27-28

    Topics: Cholinergic Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; L

2004
Modern histamine H1-receptor antagonists in the unified airway.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Pro

2004
[The influence of desloratadine on course of intermittens allergic rhinitis].
    Polski merkuriusz lekarski : organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego, 2005, Volume: 18, Issue:104

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Disease Progression; Female; H

2005
[Seasonal allergic rhinitis. Nasal obstruction can also beh improved].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2001, May-03, Volume: 143, Issue:18

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Loratadine; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nasal O

2001