lisinopril and Kidney-Diseases

Lisinopril is an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor that is largely administered for off-label uses. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of off-label uses of lisinopril to aid physicians to make evidence-based decisions.. The following bibliographic databases were searched from inception up to 30 March 2017: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Ovid and Proquest. This systematic review sought all randomized trials conducted on adult individuals comparing lisinopril on its off-label uses with alternative drugs or placebos and reported direct or alternative clinical outcomes. Risk of bias assessment by using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool and quality evaluation took place.. Included studies demonstrated significant positive effects of lisinopril on proteinuric kidney disease; however, lisinopril caused a slight reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) especially for patients with GFR < 90 ml min. The identified studies showed that lisinopril was highly effective for proteinuric kidney disease with a minor but inconsiderable decrease in GFR. Positive effects of lisinopril were demonstrated in seven other off-label uses; however, lisinopril cannot be recommended as the first choice for these until further clinical trials confirm these positive effects.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Off-Label Use; Proteinuria; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF), a debilitating condition associated with impaired quality of life and markedly shortened life expectancy, is increasing. The goals of therapy for CHF are reducing symptoms, improving functional capacity, and slowing the progression of the condition. In most cases, this is best achieved with a combination of diuretic and vasodilator therapy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have several advantages over other vasodilatory agents and are becoming widely used for treating CHF. The most recently introduced ACE inhibitor, fosinopril, is at least as effective as enalapril, and its dual and compensatory route of excretion is particularly advantageous in patients with renal insufficiency. Fosinopril may also have particular benefits in the prevention of CHF, as it has beneficial effects on cardiac function that may help delay the onset of overt cardiac failure.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Enalaprilat; Exercise Tolerance; Fosinopril; Half-Life; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male

Structurally, lisinopril differs from captopril in that it does not contain a sulphydryl group and it differs from enalapril and related compounds in that it is not an ester prodrug. Published data on the clinical pharmacology of lisinopril are reviewed and data from new studies are presented. A radioimmunoassay has been used to study the clinical pharmacokinetics of lisinopril and 14C-lisinopril has been used in metabolism studies in man. Following oral administration, lisinopril is absorbed slowly but the absorbed drug is immediately available without any requirement for biotransformation by the liver. The plasma half-life controlling accumulation during chronic administration is 12-13 h and the absorbed drug is eliminated via glomerular filtration. These properties are consistent with once-daily dosing and uncomplicated clinical use in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Topics: Aging; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Drug Interactions; Enalapril; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril

Whether improvements in arterial compliance with BP lowering are because of BP reduction alone or if pleiotropic effects of antihypertensive agents contribute remains unclear. It was hypothesized that, among patients on hemodialysis, compared with a β-blocker (atenolol), a lisinopril-based therapy will better reduce arterial stiffness.. Among 200 participants of the Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Atenolol or Lisinopril Trial, 179 patients with valid assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity at baseline (89 patients randomly assigned to open-label lisinopril and 90 patients randomly assigned to atenolol three times a week after dialysis) were included in the secondary analysis. Among them, 109 patients had a valid pulse wave velocity measurement at 6 months. Monthly measured home BP was targeted to <140/90 mmHg by addition of antihypertensive drugs and dry weight adjustment. The difference between drugs in percentage change of aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to 6 months was analyzed.. Contrary to the hypothesis, atenolol-based treatment induced greater reduction in aortic pulse wave velocity relative to lisinopril (between drug difference, 14.8%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5% to 28.5%; P=0.03). Reduction in 44-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP was no different between groups (median [25th, 75th percentile]; atenolol: -21.5 [-37.7, -7.6] versus lisinopril: -15.8 [-28.8, -1.5] mmHg; P=0.27 for systolic BP; -14.1 [-22.6, -5.3] versus -10.9 [-18.4, -0.9] mmHg, respectively; P=0.30 for diastolic BP). Between-drug difference in change of aortic pulse wave velocity persisted after adjustments for age, sex, race, other cardiovascular risk factors, and baseline ambulatory systolic BP but disappeared after adjustment for change in ambulatory systolic BP (11.8%; 95% confidence interval, -2.3% to 25.9%; P=0.10).. Among patients on dialysis, atenolol was superior in improving arterial stiffness. However, differences between atenolol and lisinopril in improving aortic stiffness among patients on hemodialysis may be explained by BP-lowering effects of drugs.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Female; Humans; Indiana; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Pulse Wave Analysis; Renal Dialysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Stiffness

CKD is common among older patients. This article assesses long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes in older high-risk hypertensive patients, stratified by baseline estimated GFR (eGFR), and long-term outcome efficacy of 5-year first-step treatment with amlodipine or lisinopril, each compared with chlorthalidone.. This was a long-term post-trial follow-up of hypertensive participants (n=31,350), aged ≥55 years, randomized to receive chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril for 4-8 years at 593 centers. Participants were stratified by baseline eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) as follows: normal/increased (≥90; n=8027), mild reduction (60-89; n=17,778), and moderate/severe reduction (<60; n=5545). Outcomes were cardiovascular mortality (primary outcome), total mortality, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, heart failure, and ESRD.. After an average 8.8-year follow-up, total mortality was significantly higher in participants with moderate/severe eGFR reduction compared with those with normal and mildly reduced eGFR (P<0.001). In participants with an eGFR <60, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality between chlorthalidone and amlodipine (P=0.64), or chlorthalidone and lisinopril (P=0.56). Likewise, no significant differences were observed for total mortality, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, or ESRD.. CKD is associated with significantly higher long-term risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in older hypertensive patients. By eGFR stratum, 5-year treatment with amlodipine or lisinopril was not superior to chlorthalidone in preventing cardiovascular events, mortality, or ESRD during 9-year follow-up. Because data on proteinuria were not available, these findings may not be extrapolated to proteinuric CKD.

Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Canada; Chlorthalidone; Chronic Disease; Coronary Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Hypolipidemic Agents; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Puerto Rico; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Virgin Islands

To compare the effects on proteinuria and blood pressure of addition of dietary sodium restriction or angiotensin receptor blockade at maximum dose, or their combination, in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy receiving background treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition at maximum dose.. Multicentre crossover randomised controlled trial.. Outpatient clinics in the Netherlands.. 52 patients with non-diabetic nephropathy.. All patients were treated during four 6 week periods, in random order, with angiotensin receptor blockade (valsartan 320 mg/day) or placebo, each combined with, consecutively, a low sodium diet (target 50 mmol Na(+)/day) and a regular sodium diet (target 200 mmol Na(+)/day), with a background of ACE inhibition (lisinopril 40 mg/day) during the entire study. The drug interventions were double blind; the dietary interventions were open label.. The primary outcome measure was proteinuria; the secondary outcome measure was blood pressure.. Mean urinary sodium excretion, a measure of dietary sodium intake, was 106 (SE 5) mmol Na(+)/day during a low sodium diet and 184 (6) mmol Na(+)/day during a regular sodium diet (P<0.001). Geometric mean residual proteinuria was 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.14) g/day during ACE inhibition plus a regular sodium diet. Addition of angiotensin receptor blockade to ACE inhibition reduced proteinuria to 1.44 (1.07 to 1.93) g/day (P=0.003), addition of a low sodium diet reduced it to 0.85 (0.66 to 1.10) g/day (P<0.001), and addition of angiotensin receptor blockade plus a low sodium diet reduced it to 0.67 (0.50 to 0.91) g/day (P<0.001). The reduction of proteinuria by the addition of a low sodium diet to ACE inhibition (51%, 95% confidence interval 43% to 58%) was significantly larger (P<0.001) than the reduction of proteinuria by the addition of angiotensin receptor blockade to ACE inhibition (21%, (8% to 32%) and was comparable (P=0.009, not significant after Bonferroni correction) to the reduction of proteinuria by the addition of both angiotensin receptor blockade and a low sodium diet to ACE inhibition (62%, 53% to 70%). Mean systolic blood pressure was 134 (3) mm Hg during ACE inhibition plus a regular sodium diet. Mean systolic blood pressure was not significantly altered by the addition of angiotensin receptor blockade (131 (3) mm Hg; P=0.12) but was reduced by the addition of a low sodium diet (123 (2) mm Hg; P<0.001) and angiotensin receptor blockade plus a low sodium diet (121 (3) mm Hg; P<0.001) to ACE inhibition. The reduction of systolic blood pressure by the addition of a low sodium diet (7% (SE 1%)) was significantly larger (P=0.003) than the reduction of systolic blood pressure by the addition of angiotensin receptor blockade (2% (1)) and was similar (P=0.14) to the reduction of systolic blood pressure by the addition of both angiotensin receptor blockade and low sodium diet (9% (1)), to ACE inhibition.. Dietary sodium restriction to a level recommended in guidelines was more effective than dual blockade for reduction of proteinuria and blood pressure in non-diabetic nephropathy. The findings support the combined endeavours of patients and health professionals to reduce sodium intake. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR675.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Cross-Over Studies; Diet, Sodium-Restricted; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Proteinuria; Sodium Chloride, Dietary; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Valsartan

Renoprotection is predicted by the antiproteinuric efficacy of a pharmacological agent. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) interfering non-selectively in the prostaglandin system have strong antiproteinuric potency without reduction of systemic blood pressure. The effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib in proteinuric patients is unknown, granted recently reported detrimental effects in non-renal patients. Short-term effects of rofecoxib on proteinuria and blood pressure as compared to NSAID and RAAS blockade were studied.. Sixteen stable patients [mean proteinuria 4.4 g/ day; MAP 103 mmHg)] were included after a wash-out period. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg QD was given throughout. Additional blood pressure control was ensured by non-RAAS blocking antihypertensive agents. Patients received rofecoxib 25 mg QD, 50 mg QD and indomethacin 75 mg BID in randomized order for 4 weeks. Thereafter, a subset of the included patients (n = 11) received lisinopril 40 mg QD for 6 weeks preceded by a wash-out period.. Rofecoxib exerted a dose-dependent antiproteinuric effect. As compared to rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg, indomethacin was more effective [-18, -28 versus -49% (n = 16; P < 0.05)]. As compared to rofecoxib 50 mg, lisinopril was more effective [-21 versus -51% (n = 11; P < 0.05)]. No significant blood pressure changes were observed after rofecoxib and indomethacin, whereas lisinopril had a significant antihypertensive effect.. Selective COX-2 inhibition reduces proteinuria without reduction of systemic blood pressure, pointing towards a specific renal effect, and may serve as a novel non-hypotensive adjunct antiproteinuric treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Blood Pressure; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indomethacin; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lactones; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Sulfones

Chronic kidney disease is common in older patients with hypertension.. To compare rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) events; to determine whether glomerular filtration rate (GFR) independently predicts risk for CHD; and to report the efficacy of first-step treatment with a calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine) or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril), each compared with a diuretic (chlorthalidone), in modifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in high-risk patients with hypertension stratified by GFR.. Post hoc subgroup analysis.. Multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.. Persons with hypertension who were 55 years of age or older with 1 or more risk factors for CHD and who were stratified into 3 baseline GFR groups: normal or increased (> or = 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2; n = 8126 patients), mild reduction (60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m2; n = 18,109 patients), and moderate or severe reduction (< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2; n = 5662 patients).. Random assignment to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril.. Rates of ESRD, CHD, stroke, and combined CVD (CHD, coronary revascularization, angina, stroke, heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease).. In participants with a moderate to severe reduction in GFR, 6-year rates were higher for CHD than for ESRD (15.4% vs. 6.0%, respectively). A baseline GFR of less than 53 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (compared with >104 mL/min per 1.73 m2) was independently associated with a 32% higher risk for CHD. Amlodipine was similar to chlorthalidone in reducing CHD (16.0% vs. 15.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.27]), stroke, and combined CVD (CHD, coronary revascularization, angina, stroke, heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease), but less effective in preventing heart failure. Lisinopril was similar to chlorthalidone in preventing CHD (15.1% vs. 15.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.00 [CI, 0.84 to 1.20]), but was less effective in reducing stroke, combined CVD events, and heart failure.. Proteinuria data were not available, and combination therapies were not tested.. Older high-risk patients with hypertension and reduced GFR are more likely to develop CHD than to develop ESRD. A low GFR independently predicts increased risk for CHD. Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril is superior to chlorthalidone in preventing CHD, stroke, or combined CVD, and chlorthalidone is superior to both for preventing heart failure, independent of level of renal function.

Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorthalidone; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Agents that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce proteinuria and afford renal protection. The combination of different measures that serve maximization of RAS blockade is thought to improve the antiproteinuric efficacy. The feasibility and the efficacy of such a combination strategy were studied in nondiabetic patients with residual proteinuria during previous RAS blockade by individual antiproteinuric titration. Previous medication was replaced by irbesartan 300 mg combined with a diuretic. Lisinopril was added in increasing doses until a maximal dose of 40 mg/d. Titration stopped when target proteinuria (< 1 g/d) was reached or further dose titration was not tolerated because of side effects. Residual proteinuria (median, 3.2 g/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.2 g/d) was significantly reduced with 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 73.2%; P < 0.02) on the maximal additional tolerated dose of lisinopril. The maximal dose of lisinopril was 10 mg in two of eight, 20 mg in two of eight, 30 mg in one of eight, and 40 mg in three of eight patients. At this dose, target proteinuria of < 1 g/d was reached in two of eight patients. The number of patients with adverse events during dose titration was five of eight patients: two had cough; two had hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L), one of whom had > 50% increase of serum creatinine; and one had dizziness. In conclusion, individual titration for maximal RAS blockade, entailing dose titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on top of high-dose angiotensin II antagonists with diuretic, induces further reduction of residual proteinuria. However, this occurs at the expense of adverse events. To further improve renoprotective treatment strategies, it is important to explore other modes of antiproteinuric intervention in patients with residual proteinuria during RAS blockade.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biological Availability; Biphenyl Compounds; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Irbesartan; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Function Tests; Lisinopril; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Probability; Proteinuria; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Urinalysis

Dyslipidemia frequently complicates chronic nephropathies and increases the risk of renal and cardiovascular events. This might be ameliorated by drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, which effectively reduce proteinuria.. In this longitudinal study, we evaluated the extent to which uptitration of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril to maximum tolerated doses (median [range]: 30 [10 to 40] mg/d) ameliorated proteinuria and dyslipidemia in 28 patients with nondiabetic chronic nephropathies. Maximum lisinopril doses significantly and safely reduced proteinuria, serum total, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides without substantially affecting serum HDL and renal hemodynamics. Proteinuria already decreased at 10 mg/d. Serum lipids progressively and dose-dependently decreased during uptitration to maximum doses. Reduction in total and LDL cholesterol correlated with increases in serum albumin/total protein concentration and oncotic pressure, peaked at lisinopril maximum doses, and persisted after treatment withdrawal. Despite less proteinuria reduction, hypercholesterolemia decreased more (and reflected the increase in serum albumin) in hypoalbuminemic than in normoalbuminemic patients who, despite more proteinuria reduction, had less decrease in cholesterol and no changes in serum albumin. Changes in serum triglycerides were independent of changes in serum proteins, were strongly correlated with lisinopril doses (r=-0.89, P=0.003) and recovered promptly after treatment withdrawal. Lisinopril was well tolerated, did not affect renal hemodynamics, and caused symptomatic, reversible hypotension in only two patients.. In chronic nephropathies, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor uptitration to maximum tolerated doses safely ameliorated hypertriglyceridemia by a direct, dose-dependent effect, and hypercholesterolemia through amelioration of the nephrotic syndrome, particularly in patients with more severe hypoalbuminemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Chronic Disease; Diuretics; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Function Tests; Lisinopril; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Sodium, Dietary; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers has been shown to reduce proteinuria and to slow down the progression of renal disease in diabetic and non-diabetic primary proteinuric nephropathies. Additionally, this beneficial effect is not dependent on blood pressure control.. To assess and compare the effects of lisinopril (up to 40 mg/day), candesartan (up to 32 mg/day) and combination therapy (lisinopril up to 20 mg/day plus candesartan up to 16 mg/day) on urinary protein excretion, 45 patients with primary proteinuric nephropathies (urinary protein/creatinine ratio 3.8+/-2.4 g/g) and normal or slightly reduced renal function (CCr 95+/-33 mL/min) were enrolled in a six month multicenter, prospective, open, randomized, active-controlled and parallel-group trial with 1:1:1 allocation. Blood pressure goal was set at or below 125/75 mm Hg for all patients, with additional antihypertensive medication prescribed if required.. Renal function, estimated by creatinine clearance, remained stable throughout the study. Hyperkalemia (K>5.5 mmol/L) was detected in 3.1% of all measurements in follow-up, and was more frequent in patients treated with lisinopril alone or lisinopril plus candesartan (P<0.001) than in those on candesartan alone. No other relevant adverse event was recorded. The blood pressure goal (<125/75 mm Hg) was achieved by week 4 in all treatment groups (P<0.005 when compared to baseline), and afterwards the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure remained below these values until the end of the trial with no statistically significant differences between groups. Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (percentage reduction 95% confidence intervals CI) decreased in patients treated with lisinopril alone to -33% (CI -12-56) to -31% (CI 0-68) and to -50% (CI -9-90), in patients treated with candesartan to -28% (CI -12-45), to -41% (CI -30-52) and to -48% (CI -32-63), in patients treated with the combination of both to -60% (CI -44-77) to -54% (CI -38-69) and to -70% (CI -57-83) at two, three, and six months, respectively. All comparisons with baseline achieved statistical significance and treatment with combination therapy was statistically more effective in proteinuria reduction than treatment with candesartan alone at two and six months (P=0.004 and P=0.023, respectively) and than treatment with lisinopril only at two months (P=0.03).. Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers produces a beneficial antiproteinuric effect that could not be explained only by the systemic blood pressure reduction. All treatments were well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Creatinine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Renin-Angiotensin System; Spain; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but most affected patients are not receiving these agents or are being treated with doses lower than those found to be efficacious in trials, primarily because of concerns about the safety and tolerability of these agents, especially at the recommended doses. The present study examines the safety and tolerability of high- compared with low-dose lisinopril in CHF.. The Assessment of Lisinopril and Survival study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial in which patients with or without previous ACE inhibitor treatment were stabilized receiving medium-dose lisinopril (12.5 or 15.0 mg once daily [OD]) for 2 to 4 weeks and then randomized to high- (35.0 or 32.5 mg OD) or low-dose (5.0 or 2.5 mg OD) groups. Patients with New York Heart Association classes II to IV CHF and left ventricular ejection fractions of no greater than 0.30 (n = 3164) were randomized and followed up for a median of 46 months. We examined the occurrence of adverse events and the need for discontinuation and dose reduction during treatment, with a focus on hypotension and renal dysfunction.. Of 405 patients not previously receiving an ACE inhibitor, doses in only 4.2% could not be titrated to the medium doses required for randomization because of symptoms possibly related to hypotension (2.0%) or because of renal dysfunction or hyperkalemia (2.3%). Doses in more than 90% of randomized patients in the high- and low-dose groups were titrated to their assigned target, and the mean doses of blinded medication in both groups remained similar throughout the study. Withdrawals occurred in 27.1% of the high- and 30.7% of the low-dose groups. Subgroups presumed to be at higher risk for ACE inhibitor intolerance (blood pressure, <120 mm Hg; creatinine, > or =132.6 micromol/L [> or =1.5 mg/dL]; age, > or =70 years; and patients with diabetes) generally tolerated the high-dose strategy.. These findings demonstrate that ACE inhibitor therapy in most patients with CHF can be successfully titrated to and maintained at high doses, and that more aggressive use of these agents is warranted.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male

The aim of the study was to determine whether Lisinopril, an ACE-inhibitor (ACEi), was more effective than other antihypertensive agents in slowing the progression of non-diabetic chronic renal diseases in patients with baseline proteinuria < or =1.0 g/day.. In an open, multicentre study all eligible patients entered a 3 months run-in phase during which antihypertensive therapy (with exclusion of ACEi) was adjusted in order to obtain a supine diastolic blood pressure < or =90 mmHg and urinary protein excretion and renal function stability were verified. One hundred and thirty-one patients with chronic renal insufficiency (Clcr between 20-50 ml/min) because of primary renoparenchymal diseases and proteinuria < or =1.0 g/day, were randomized to Lisinopril (L=66) or alternative antihypertensive therapy (C=65). Changes in renal function were assessed by inulin (Clin) clearance.. During the follow-up period of 22.5+/-5.6 months, Clin did not change significantly in group L (-1.31+/-0.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) differing significantly from group C in which it declined markedly (-6.71+/-3.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) (P<0.04). Seven patients experienced adverse events that prompted discontinuation of treatment: four in group L and three in group C; in addition seven patients showed severe deterioration in renal function requiring dialysis: two in group L and five in group C. The overall risk of the combined end-points: need for dialysis or halving of GFR was significantly higher in group C versus group L. During the study the mean value for systolic blood pressure was 137.8+/-14.6 SD mmHg in group L and 140.8+/-14.1 SD mmHg in group C; the mean difference between groups, during and at the end of the study, was 2 mmHg (NS). The mean diastolic blood pressure during the study was 83.8+/-8.6 SD mmHg in group L and 84.3+/-7.56 SD mmHg in group C; during and at the end of the study the mean diastolic difference between groups was 1 mmHG:. This study, employing a sensitive measurement of renal function and with similar blood pressure in both groups, provides support to the hypothesis that ACEi have a specific renoprotective effect, in addition to blood pressure control, also in patients with mild proteinuria.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Pressure; Chronic Disease; Diastole; Disease Progression; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Protective Agents; Proteinuria

The pharmacokinetics of combined lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide have been studied following single and multiple oral doses to 'young' (reference), elderly and renally impaired hypertensive patients. Tablets containing the fixed combination of lisinopril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg were administered as a single dose followed by daily administration for 6-8 days. Serum concentration and haemodynamic measurements were made at intervals up to 48 hours after the first and last doses. The serum profiles of both drugs were comparable with observations from previous studies, showing higher concentrations in the elderly and in the renally impaired patients. Similar differences have been reported for such patient groups when the drugs were administered separately, indicating an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction. Both drugs accumulated by about 30% on multiple daily dosing. There were no differences between the patient groups in the extent of accumulation. The combination of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide produced the expected hypotensive response, minimum BP values being recorded 4 and 6 hours after treatment. The higher concentrations in the elderly and renally impaired patients were not associated with a greater reduction in BP. The pharmacokinetic behaviour of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide given together to elderly and renally impaired hypertensive patients suggests that a fixed dose combination is appropriate and that no changes to the dosage regimen additional to those used for the individual agents are necessary.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged

We studied the efficacy of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril in treating overt proteinuria in comparison with the NSAID indomethacin, and evaluated some of the conditions that could influence this antiproteinuric effect. In 12 patients with a proteinuria varying from 3.2 to 10.5 g/24 hr, a diastolic BP ranging from 64 to 105 mm Hg, and a GFR varying from 34 to 127 ml/min, the effect of different lisinopril doses and of changing dietary sodium intake was evaluated. Proteinuria fell by 27 +/- 20% from 6.1 +/- 2.1 to 4.5 +/- 1.9 g/24 hr on a low dose (median 5 mg/day) lisinopril and by 50 +/- 17% to 3.1 +/- 1.4 g/24 hr on a higher dose (median 10 mg/day), irrespective of initial proteinuria, BP, or GFR. This antiproteinuric effect was abolished by increasing salt intake from 50 to 200 mmol/day, and was recovered again by re-instituting the sodium restricted diet. The antiproteinuric effect of 10 mg/day lisinopril was comparable to the reduction in proteinuria (by 57 +/- 21% to 2.8 +/- 2.0 g/24 hr) on 150 mg/day indomethacin, while adverse effects were less and renal hemodynamic effects were more favorable during lisinopril. In some patients it took several weeks before the effect of the ACE inhibitor on proteinuria was stabilized. Thus, the antiproteinuric effect of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril appears to be dose and time related, and is strongly dependent on dietary sodium restriction, whereas it does not depend on initial proteinuria, BP, or GFR. The effect is comparable to that of indomethacin, while adverse effects are less.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Diet, Sodium-Restricted; Enalapril; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Indomethacin; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Proteinuria; Renal Circulation; Sodium, Dietary; Vascular Resistance

A 42-year-old woman was referred from a primary care centre for severe hypertension, stage 3A chronic kidney disease and proteinuria. This was associated with a significant obstetric history of pre-eclampsia during her previous two pregnancies. Secondary hypertension was suspected and autoimmune workup was positive for anticardiolipin IgG and lupus anticoagulant. A renal biopsy showed evidence of chronic thrombotic microangiopathy, with electron microscopy features suggestive of fibrillar glomerulonephritis. The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome with antiphospholipid-associated nephropathy was made. She was started on anticoagulation with warfarin, and her hypertension was controlled with lisinopril and amlodipine with subsequent improvement in proteinuria. She remains on regular follow-up to monitor for possible development of malignancy or connective tissue disease.

Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Thrombotic Microangiopathies; Warfarin

The kidney is one of the most radiosensitive organs; it is the primary dose-limiting organ in radiotherapies for upper abdominal cancers. The role of mitochondrial redox state in the development and treatment of renal radiation injury, however, remains ill-defined. This study utilizes 3D optical cryo-imaging to quantify renal mitochondrial bioenergetics dysfunction after 13 Gy leg-out partial body irradiation (PBI). Furthermore, the mitigating effects of lisinopril (lisino), an anti-hypertensive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, is assessed in renal radiation-induced injuries. Around day 150 post-irradiation, kidneys are harvested for cryo-imaging. The 3D images of the metabolic indices (NADH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide) are acquired, and the mitochondrial redox states of the irradiated and irradiated + lisino kidneys are quantified by calculating the volumetric mean redox ratio (NADH/FAD). PBI oxidized renal mitochondrial redox state by 78%. The kidneys from the irradiated + lisino rats showed mitigation of mitochondrial redox state by 93% compared to the PBI group. The study provides evidence for an altered bioenergetics and energy metabolism in the rat model of irradiation-induced kidney damage. In addition, the results suggest that lisinopril mitigates irradiation damage by attenuating the oxidation of mitochondria leading to increase redox ratio.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Female; Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide; Gamma Rays; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Mitochondria; NAD; Radiation Injuries; Rats

The current study sought to clarify the role of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) in repressing nephropathy in the experimental model. Moreover, the aim of this work was extended to compare between stem cells role and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in kidney repair.. Isolation and preparation of MSCs culture, flow cytometry using CD34, CD44 and CD105 cell surface markers, biochemical analyses for determination of serum creatinine, urea, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), cystatin C (CYS-C) and urinary N-Acetyl-ß-D-Glucosaminidase (UNAG), and histopathological investigation of kidney tissue sections were performed.. The results of the present study revealed that single intravenous infusion of MSCs either derived from bone marrow or adipose tissue was able to enhance renal reparative processes through significantly decreased serum creatinine, urea, TGF-β and CYS-C levels as well as UNAG level and significantly increase glomerular filtration rate. Additionally, the histopathological investigations of kidney tissues showed that MSCs have significant regenerative effects as evidenced by the decrease in focal inflammatory cells infiltration, focal interstitial nephritis and congested glomeruli as well as degenerated tubules.. The current data provided distinct evidence about the favourable impact of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in attenuation of cyclosporine-induced nephropathy in rats through their ability to promote functional and structural kidney repair via transdifferentiation.

Topics: Adipogenesis; Adipose Tissue; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biomarkers; Bone Marrow Cells; Cell Lineage; Cell Transdifferentiation; Cells, Cultured; Chondrogenesis; Cyclosporine; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Osteogenesis; Rats, Wistar; Regeneration; Sex-Determining Region Y Protein; Time Factors

Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Renal Dialysis; Vascular Stiffness

Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Renal Dialysis; Vascular Stiffness

The mechanism of hypertension-induced renal fibrosis is not well understood, although it is established that high levels of angiotensin II contribute to the effect. Since β-catenin signal transduction participates in fibrotic processes, we evaluated the contribution of β-catenin-dependent signaling pathway in hypertension-induced renal fibrosis. Two-kidney one-clip (2K1C) hypertensive rats were treated with lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day for four weeks) or with pyrvinium pamoate (Wnt signaling inhibitor, single dose of 60 ug/kg, every 3 days for 2 weeks). The treatment with lisinopril reduced the systolic blood pressure from 220 ± 4 in 2K1C rats to 112 ± 5 mmHg (P < 0.05), whereas the reduction in blood pressure with pyrvinium pamoate was not significant (212 ± 6 in 2K1C rats to 170 ± 3 mmHg, P > 0.05). The levels of collagen types I and III, osteopontin, and fibronectin decreased in the unclipped kidney in both treatments compared with 2K1C rats. The expressions of β-catenin, p-Ser9-GSK-3beta, and the β-catenin target genes cyclin D1, c-myc, and bcl-2 significantly decreased in unclipped kidney in both treatments (P < 0.05). In this study we provided evidence that β-catenin-dependent signaling pathway participates in the renal fibrosis induced in 2K1C rats.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; beta Catenin; Blood Pressure; Cyclin D1; Fibrosis; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Pyrvinium Compounds; Rats; Signal Transduction

Lisinopril and perindopril are two commonly used first-line antihypertensive agents. Few studies compared their effectiveness in reducing the incidence of renal diseases and diabetes.. Adult patients who received new prescriptions of lisinopril or perindopril from 2001 to 2005 in all public hospitals and clinics in Hong Kong were included, and followed up for at least 2 years. Patients prescribed the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) for <1 month were excluded. The incidence of admissions due to renal diseases and diabetes was evaluated. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to assess hospital admissions as the outcome measures, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, service types, and the proportion of days covered as a measure of medication adherence. The regression models were constructed with propensity score matching to minimize indication biases.. 20,252 eligible patients with an average age of 64.5 years (SD 15.0) were included. The admission rates 24 months within the date of index prescription due to renal diseases were 3.1% (lisinopril) and 2.3% (perindopril); and 9.6% (lisinopril) and 7.2% (perindopril) for diabetes. Except for admissions due to diabetes at 6 months, lisinopril users were significantly more likely to be admitted due to renal diseases (adjusted hazard ratios: 1.304 to 1.378) and diabetes (1.146 to 1.231) than perindopril users at all time points.. Patients prescribed different ACEIs might have a different incidence of hospital admissions. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different ACEIs on various patient-centered outcomes by head-to-head randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Perindopril; Treatment Outcome

We tested five different angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) as mitigators of experimental radiation nephropathy at drug doses calibrated to the plasma renin activity (PRA). This was done to determine whether all ACEI had the same efficacy as mitigators of radiation nephropathy when used at drug doses that gave equivalent suppression of the renin angiotensin system.. 10 Gy total body irradiation with bone marrow transplantation was used to cause radiation nephropathy in barrier-maintained rats. Equivalent ACEI doses were determined based on their effect to inhibit angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and raise the PRA in unirradiated animals.. PRA-equivalent doses were found for captopril, lisinopril, enalapril, ramipril and fosinopril. These doses overlap the human doses of these drugs on a body surface area basis. All ACE inhibitors, except fosinopril, mitigated radiation nephropathy; captopril was a somewhat better mitigator than lisinopril, enalapril or ramipril.. Most, but not all, ACEI mitigate radiation nephropathy at doses that overlap their clinically-used doses (on a body surface area basis). Fosinopril is known to be an ineffective mitigator of radiation pneumonitis, and it also does not mitigate radiation nephropathy. These pre-clinical data are critical in planning human studies of the mitigation of normal tissue radiation injury.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biomarkers; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Calibration; Captopril; Enalapril; Fosinopril; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Radiation Injuries; Ramipril; Rats; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Whole-Body Irradiation

In humans, we reported an association of a certain allele of carnosinase gene with reduced carnosinase activity and absence of nephropathy in diabetic patients. CN1 degrades histidine dipeptides such as carnosine and anserine. Further, we and others showed that treatment with carnosine improves renal function and wound healing in diabetic mice and rats. We now investigated the effects of carnosine treatment alone and in combination with ACE inhibition, a clinically established nephroprotective drug in diabetic nephropathy. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected i.v. with streptozotocin (STZ) to induce diabetes. After 4 weeks, rats were unilaterally nephrectomized and randomized for 24 weeks of treatment with carnosine, lisinopril or both. Renal CN1 protein concentrations were increased under diabetic conditions which correlated with decreased anserine levels. Carnosine treatment normalized CN1 abundance and reduced glucosuria, blood concentrations of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), carboxyl-methyl lysine (CML), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNac; all p<0.05 vs. non-treated STZ rats), reduced cataract formation (p<0.05) and urinary albumin excretion (p<0.05), preserved podocyte number (p<0.05) and normalized the increased renal tissue CN1 protein concentration. Treatment with lisinopril had no effect on HbA1C, glucosuria, cataract formation and CN1 concentration, but reduced albumin excretion rate more effectively than carnosine treatment (p<0.05). Treatment with both carnosine and lisinopril combined the effects of single treatment, albeit without additive effect on podocyte number or albuminuria. Increased CN1 amount resulted in decreased anserine levels in the kidney. Both carnosine and lisinopril exert distinct beneficial effects in a standard model of diabetic nephropathy. Both drugs administered together combine the respective effects of single treatment, albeit without exerting additive nephroprotection.

Topics: Animals; Carnosine; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Streptozocin

Addressing safety concerns such as drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) early in the drug pharmaceutical development process ensures both patient safety and efficient clinical development. We describe a unique adjunct to standard safety assessment wherein the metabolite profile of treated animals is compared with the MetaMap Tox metabolomics database in order to predict the potential for a wide variety of adverse events, including DIKI. To examine this approach, a study of five compounds (phenytoin, cyclosporin A, doxorubicin, captopril, and lisinopril) was initiated by the Technology Evaluation Consortium under the auspices of the Drug Safety Executive Council (DSEC). The metabolite profiles for rats treated with these compounds matched established reference patterns in the MetaMap Tox metabolomics database indicative of each compound's well-described clinical toxicities. For example, the DIKI associated with cyclosporine A and doxorubicin was correctly predicted by metabolite profiling, while no evidence for DIKI was found for phenytoin, consistent with its clinical picture. In some cases the clinical toxicity (hepatotoxicity), not generally seen in animal studies, was detected with MetaMap Tox. Thus metabolite profiling coupled with the MetaMap Tox metabolomics database offers a unique and powerful approach for augmenting safety assessment and avoiding clinical adverse events such as DIKI.

Topics: Animals; Captopril; Cyclosporine; Doxorubicin; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Metabolome; Metabolomics; Phenytoin; Rats; Rats, Wistar

To investigate the potential role of renalase in adriamycin nephropathy and the effect of lisinopril on the regulation of renalase.. Adriamycin nephropathy was induced in male Wistar rats (n=12) by a single injection of adriamycin at 2 mg/kg body weight. Rats were then randomly assigned to a model group or a treatment group, to which were administered distilled water or the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril, respectively, for 12 weeks. Six normal rats served as controls. At the end of study, physiological parameters and systolic blood pressure were measured. Glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury were assessed by histopathology Renalase protein expression in kidney was quantified by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. The serum concentration and urinary excretion of renalase were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. In model group rats, proteinuria and systolic blood pressure were elevated. Increased serum renalase concentration was observed; however, renalase protein expression in the kidney was significantly decreased. Compared with the model group, decreased proteinuria, lower systolic blood pressure, and fewer morphologic lesions were detected in the treatment group. Although levels of serum renalase were similar, accumulation of renalase in urine and kidney tissue increased notably in the treatment group compared with the model group.. This study suggests that renalase may be involved in the process of adriamycin-induced renal injuries. Lisinopril may attenuate adriamycin-induced kidney injury by controlling blood pressure, which may be partially attributed to the renalase expression and secretion.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Doxorubicin; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Monoamine Oxidase; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Chlorthalidone; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Hypolipidemic Agents; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Myocardial Infarction

Proteinuria is an important cause of progressive tubulo-interstitial damage. Whether proteinuria could trigger a renal lymphangiogenic response has not been established. Moreover, the temporal relationship between development of fibrosis, inflammation and lymphangiogenesis in chronic progressive kidney disease is not clear yet. Therefore, we evaluated the time course of lymph vessel (LV) formation in relation to proteinuria and interstitial damage in a rat model of chronic unilateral adriamycin nephrosis. Proteinuria and kidneys were evaluated up to 30 weeks after induction of nephrosis. LVs were identified by podoplanin/VEGFR3 double staining. After 6 weeks proteinuria was well-established, without influx of interstitial macrophages and myofibroblasts, collagen deposition, osteopontin expression (tubular activation) or LV formation. At 12 weeks, a ∼3-fold increase in cortical LV density was found (p<0.001), gradually increasing over time. This corresponded with a significant increase in tubular osteopontin expression (p<0.01) and interstitial myofibroblast numbers (p<0.05), whereas collagen deposition and macrophage numbers were not yet increased. VEGF-C was mostly expressed by tubular cells rather than interstitial cells. Cultured tubular cells stimulated with FCS showed a dose-dependent increase in mRNA and protein expression of VEGF-C which was not observed by human albumin stimulation. We conclude that chronic proteinuria provoked lymphangiogenesis in temporal conjunction with tubular osteopontin expression and influx of myofibroblasts, that preceded interstitial fibrosis.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; Fibrosis; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Tubules; Lisinopril; Lymphangiogenesis; Lymphatic Vessels; Male; Proteinuria; Rats; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C

The study aimed to predict effective human jejunal permeability (P(eff)) using a biophysical model based on parametrized paracellular, aqueous boundary layer, and transcellular permeabilities, and the villus-fold surface area expansion factor (k(VF)). Published human jejunal data (119 P(eff), 53 compounds) were analyzed by a regression procedure incorporating a dual-pore size paracellular model. Transcellular permeability, scaled by k(VF), was equated to that of Caco-2 at pH 6.5. The biophysical model predicted human jejunal permeability data within the experimental uncertainty. This investigation revealed several surprising predictions: (i) many molecules permeate predominantly (but not exclusively) by the paracellular route, (ii) the aqueous boundary layer thickness in the intestinal perfusion experiments is larger than expected, (iii) the mucosal surface area in awake humans is apparently nearly entirely accessible to drug absorption, and (iv) the relative "leakiness" of the human jejunum is not so different from that observed in a number of published Caco-2 studies.

Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Humans; Jejunal Diseases; Kidney Diseases; Models, Biological; Permeability; Porosity; Regression Analysis

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because they slow disease progression. But physicians' concerns about the risk of hyperkalemia (elevated serum potassium level), a potentially fatal adverse effect, may limit optimal management with ACE-inhibitors. We synthesized known predictors of hyperkalemia into a prognostic risk score to predict the risk of hyperkalemia.. We assembled a retrospective cohort of adult patients with possible CKD (at least one estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) who started an ACE-inhibitor (i.e., incident users) between 1998 and 2006 at a health maintenance organization. We followed patients for hyperkalemia: (1) potassium value >5.5 mmol/L; or (2) diagnosis code for hyperkalemia. Cox regression synthesized a priori predictors recorded in the electronic medical record into a risk score.. We followed 5171 patients and 145 experienced hyperkalemia, a 90-day risk of 2.8%. Predictors included: age, eGFR, diabetes, heart failure, potassium supplements, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a high dose for the ACE-inhibitor (lisinopril). The risk score separated high-risk patients (top quintile, observed risk of 6.9%) from low-risk patients (bottom quintile, observed risk of 0.7%). Predicted and observed risks agreed within 1% for each quintile. The risk increased gradually in relation to declining eGFR with no apparent threshold for contraindicating ACE-inhibitors.. The risk score separated high-risk patients (who may need more intensive laboratory monitoring) from low-risk patients. The risk score should be validated in other populations before it is ready for use in clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Risk Factors

Spontaneous hemorrhage in the kidney, also known as Wunderlich Syndrome, is a rare clinical problem. The most common cause of spontaneous renal hemorrhage is tumor. Other causes are rupture of a renal cyst, vasculitis, hydronephrosis, preeclampsia, and kidney infections.. A 67-year-old man was admitted complaining left flank colic pain. A contrast CT scan showed the presence of a subcapsular hematoma of the left kidney extending from the upper to the lower pole. He had no history of trauma and immunological screening tests for vasculitis were normal. His current therapy included acetylsalicylic acid (100 mg/daily) and lisinopril (20 mg/ daily). The patient was hospitalized for 4 days and his circulatory state remained stable. Nine months later an ultrasound examination showed complete resolution of the hematoma. One year later the patient was admitted again because of a spontaneous right calf hematoma and a thoroughly investigation of his coagulation pattern was carried out. Laboratory finding revealed a platelet defect, as the number of adenine nucleotides and other marker related to platelet activation were increased: ADP 1 mcM lack 2 masculine wave, ADP 2 mcM lack 2 masculine wave, Adrenalina 5 mcM lack 2 masculine wave, Adrenalina 10 mcM lack 2 masculine wave. Platelet activation markers: Gp53 in lysosomal membrane 0.48 Dpar (0 - 0.26).. Our case describes the recurrence of spontaneous hemorrhages (perirenal and intramuscular hematoma) as a result of an underlying platelet aggregation defect worsened by administration of acetylsalicylic acid. In patients on antiplatelet treatment with a history of excessive bleeding a thorough investigation of coagulation status appears beneficial.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aspirin; Hematoma; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Leg; Lisinopril; Male; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The effect of nebevolol, beta-blocker on the portal hypertension and renal blood flow and the safety of its use versus lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor were examined in the patients with cirrhosis. 72 patients were examined (39 patients with cirrhosis of the liver without ascites - the 1st group and 32 patients with cirrhosis of the liver with ascites - the 2nd group. Trustworthy decrease of portal hypertension parameters (the decrease of portovenosis gradient of pressure (PPG) by 19,3% (p = 0,048) in the patients with liver cirrhosis of class A on Child-Pugh without ascites with nebevolol was revealed. The trust worthy changes of portal blood flow was not revealed in all examined patients with lisinopril. But these patients without ascites have demonstrated the improvement of the renal hemodynamic (renal functional reserve (RFR) by 56%, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) by 17,3%). The lisinopril intake 5 mg a day declines PPG by 18,1%. The tendency of the reduction of the functional index due to the expressed hypotensive effect of nebevolol and lisinopril was revealed in all examined patients with liver cirrhosis. So it was demonstrated that for the management of the portal hypertension in the patients with liver cirrhosis is necessary to examine of functional renal condition to prevent the development of hepatorenal syndrome.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzopyrans; Ethanolamines; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Nebivolol

Pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system (RAAS) constitutes a cornerstone strategy in the management of patients with chronic nephropaties and proteinuria. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) as well as angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists (ARA) have been shown to decrease proteinuria, reduce the local renal inflammatory processes and slow the progression of renal insufficiency. Despite recent progress, there is still no optimal therapy which inhibits progression of renal disease. It is possible that pentoxifilline (PTX) an old medication which is still used to treat peripheral vascular disease will be the new adjunct to RAAS blockade. In addition, PTX has been shown to decrease the production of pro inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species. 61-Year-old man with nephrotic proteinuria, diabetes type 2, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis type C and slightly impaired renal function was desribed. Proteinuria as daily urine protein excretion (DPE), serum creatinine and eGFR (MDRD mode) were measured. Proteinuria was diagnosed in 2003 (DPE 3.5 g), creatinine 1.3-1.5 mg/dl. The patient had been examined in Department of Nephrology but exact reason of nephrotic syndrome was not recognized because he refused kidney biopsy. Therapy was started with ACEI and temporary effect as decrease of DPE to 0.2 g, eGFR was about 60 ml/min. and serum creatinine in normal range. In 2004 DPE increased to 8.98-9.42 g, serum creatinine 1.1-1.3 mg/dl. The dose of ACEI was increased and after then ARA was added. After one month of combined therapy DPE fell to 7.7 g, next the doses of both drugs were increased to maximum (losartan 100 mg and lisinopril 40 mg) and DPE fell to 6.8 g, serum creatinine was 1.4 mg/dl and potassium 5.4 mmol/l. Next PTF 800 mg/day was added and DPE fell to 0.55 g after 2 months' therapy. Similar DPE was after 6 months (0.53 g) since we started with combination of IKA, ARA and PTF.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis C; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Pentoxifylline; Proteinuria

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are involved in diabetic nephropathy. The AGE inhibitor pyridoxamine (PM) is renoprotective in experimental chronic allograft nephropathy supporting its potential in non-diabetic renal damage.. We studied the effects of PM in adriamycin nephropathy (AN; 1.5 mg/kg i.v.). Six weeks after disease induction, treatment started with vehicle (VEH), lisinopril (ACEi; 75 mg/l drinking water), PM (2 g/l) and PM + lisinopril (PM/ACEi) (n = 12 per group) for 18 weeks. Age-matched healthy rats (n = 6) served as controls (CON).. ACEi reduced proteinuria, blood pressure, and renal damage. PM gradually increased blood pressure and not affected proteinuria. In PM/ACEi the antiproteinuric and blood pressure-lowering effects of ACEi were abrogated during long-term treatment. Remarkably, creatinine, focal glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis were considerably increased under PM/ACEi. Pronounced hypercholesterolemia, which occurred in both PM-treated groups, was accompanied by marked glomerular lipid deposition.. PM was not renoprotective in AN. By contrast, renal damage was aggravated when PM was combined with ACEi. Despite the fact that there is no current evidence that these findings apply to the drug as used in human diabetic nephropathy, we emphasize the importance of close monitoring of blood pressure, lipids and possible direct toxic effects in future studies with PM in renal patients, especially when combining PM with ACEi.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Doxorubicin; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Kidney Diseases; Lipids; Lisinopril; Proteinuria; Pyridoxamine; Rats

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzopyrans; Ethanolamines; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Liver; Liver Circulation; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Nebivolol; Renal Circulation; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to compare cardiovascular and renal events in patients with hypertension receiving the angiotensin II-receptor blocker valsartan versus those receiving the angiotensin-converting-enzyme lisinopril or the beta-blocker metoprolol succinate in an extended-release formulation.. A retrospective study was conducted using a health insurance claims database spanning the period from January 1997 through December 2003 and representing approximately 40 million members enrolled in over 70 health plans across the United States. Study subjects included all persons in the database with two or more outpatient prescriptions for valsartan, lisinopril, or extended-release metoprolol and two or more prior claims with a diagnosis of hypertension. Those with a history of major cardiovascular or renal events (diagnosis of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, or cardiac arrest; coronary revascularization procedure; diagnosis of renal failure; or dialysis or kidney transplantation) or using other antihypertensive medications except diuretics during the 12 months before treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, or extended-release metoprolol were excluded. Risks of major cardiovascular or renal event during follow-up were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.. A total of 29,357 antihypertensive patients were identified who initiated therapy with valsartan (n = 6,645), lisinopril (n = 17,320), or extended-release metoprolol (n = 5,392). In multivariate analyses, therapy with valsartan was associated with a significantly lower risk of a major cardiovascular or renal event versus extended-release metoprolol (heart rate [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.87; p = 0.0015). Patients receiving valsartan had a nominally lower risk of a major cardiovascular or renal event than those receiving lisinopril, although this difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.07; p = 0.1987).. Results of this observational study suggest that the use of valsartan may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular and renal events compared with extended-release metoprolol.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Insurance Claim Review; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Metoprolol; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan

In Dahl S rats, high salt increases activity of the tissue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the CNS, heart and kidneys. Here, we assessed the effects of chronic angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on salt-induced hypertension and cardiovascular and renal hypertrophy and fibrosis, relative to the extent of ACE blockade.. From 4.5 weeks of age, Dahl S rats received either the lipophilic ACE inhibitor trandolapril (1 or 5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) or the hydrophilic ACE inhibitor lisinopril (10 or 50 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) and a high salt diet was started 0.5 week later. Treatments ended at 9 weeks of age.. High salt diet markedly increased blood pressure (BP), decreased plasma angiotensin II and increased ACE binding densities in brain, heart, aorta and kidneys. Trandolapril and lisinopril prevented 50% of the increase in BP in light and dark period of the day. After the last doses, trandolapril decreased ACE densities by approximately 80% in brain nuclei and heart and lisinopril by approximately 60% in the brain and by approximately 70% in the heart. The two ACE inhibitors prevented right ventricular hypertrophy and attenuated left ventricular hypertrophy but did not affect renal hypertrophy caused by high salt. Both drugs prevented high salt-induced fibrosis in heart, kidney and aorta.. As the ACE inhibitors could completely prevent tissue fibrosis and partially prevent tissue hypertrophy and hypertension, the tissue RAAS may play a critical role in salt-induced fibrosis, but a lesser role in the hypertrophy.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drinking; Echocardiography; Fibrosis; Heart Rate; Hypertension; Hypertrophy; Indoles; Injections, Subcutaneous; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Organ Size; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Rats; Rats, Inbred Dahl; Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1; Sodium, Dietary; Telemetry

Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorthalidone; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Diseases; Labetalol; Lisinopril; Polyarteritis Nodosa

Recently, it was shown that myocardial infarction aggravates preexistent mild renal damage that is elicited by unilateral nephrectomy in rats. The mechanism behind this cardiorenal interaction likely involves the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system and/or vasoactive peptides that are metabolized by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi) as well as combined ACE/NEP inhibition with a vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) was investigated in the same model to clarify the underlying mechanism. At week 17 after sequential induction of unilateral nephrectomy and myocardial infarction, treatment with lisinopril (ACEi), AVE7688 (VPI), or vehicle was initiated for 6 wk. Proteinuria and systolic BP (SBP) were evaluated weekly. Renal damage was assessed primarily by proteinuria, interstitial alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) staining, and the incidence of focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS). At start of treatment, proteinuria had increased progressively to 167 +/- 20 mg/d in the entire cohort (n = 42). Both ACEi and VPI provided a similar reduction in proteinuria, alpha-SMA, and FGS compared with vehicle at week 23 (proteinuria 76 +/- 6 versus 77 +/- 4%; alpha-SMA 60 +/- 6 versus 77 +/- 3%; FGS 52 +/- 14 versus 61 +/- 10%). Similar reductions in systolic BP were observed in both ACEi- and VPI-treated groups (33 +/- 3 and 37 +/- 2%, respectively). Compared with ACEi, VPI-treated rats displayed a significantly larger reduction of plasma (41 +/- 5 versus 61 +/- 4%) and renal (53 +/- 6 versus 74 +/- 4%) ACE activity. It is concluded that both ACEi and VPI intervention prevent renal damage in a rat model of cardiorenal interaction. VPI treatment seemed to provide no additional renoprotection compared with sole ACEi after 6 wk of treatment in this model, despite a more pronounced ACE-inhibiting effect of VPI.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renin-Angiotensin System

A 32-year-old male patient was admitted at our department presenting microhematuria and full nephrotic syndrome in April 1995. A percutaneous kidney biopsy showed a stage I-lI membranous nephropathy and an eight-week course with oral prednisone was initiated without response. Then, oral cyclosporine A (3.5 mg/kg/day) was given and after 5 weeks of treatment, remission of the nephrotic syndrome was observed but creatinine raised to 1.6 mg/dl, normalizing after reducing the dose of cyclosporine A. We discuss the settings, prognostic and therapeutic alternatives for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Creatinine; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Hypolipidemic Agents; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Lovastatin; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Prednisone; Recurrence; Verapamil

Normalization of proteinuria and even regression of glomerulosclerosis seem to occur in progressive renal disease upon blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Here we quantified the effect of a combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist on renal function and structure in spontaneous overt nephropathy in male Munich Wistar Fromter (MWF) rats.. Three groups of MWF rats were used: group 1 was studied at 25 weeks to provide baseline renal function and structure; group 2 was followed until 40 weeks of age; group 3 was treated with lisinopril (40 mg/L) and valsartan (180 mg/L) in drinking water from 25 to 40 weeks. A group of untreated Wistar rats (group 4, 40 weeks) was used as the control. At the end of the study renal hemodynamics, kidney tissue morphology, accumulation of type III collagen and evaluation of interstitial inflammatory cells were performed.. MWF rats spontaneously developed hypertension, proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, interstitial volume expansion and protein cast accumulation. Combined treatment completely reversed protein excretion and ameliorated renal plasma flow and the glomerular ultrafiltration coefficient. The combined therapy was effective in halting progressive glomerulosclerosis, particularly in glomeruli with mild sclerotic lesions, and reduced interstitial volume expansion. Type III collagen accumulation and protein cast also were reversed. Infiltrating cells were massively present in the interstitium already at 25 weeks, and augmented at 40 weeks in untreated rats. Combined treatment reduced infiltrating cells to values comparable to normal controls.. These data indicate that in animals with spontaneous overt nephropathy, Ang II antagonism normalized proteinuria, eliminated inflammatory cell infiltration, and ameliorated glomerular and tubular structural changes.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Body Weight; Collagen Type III; Disease Progression; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Glomerulus; Lisinopril; Macrophages; Male; Monocytes; Proteinuria; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renal Circulation; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan

Our previous studies demonstrated an increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, as well as transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) expression in the rat kidney with aging. In the present study, we examined the effect of aging on extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation and the effects of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril and lisinopril) and taurine, an antioxidant amino acid. Age-related increases in types I and IV collagen and fibronectin mRNA expression were found at 24 and 30 mo of age. In contrast, type III collagen only increased in 30-mo-old rats. Captopril-, lisinopril-, and taurine-treated animals showed a statistically significant decrease in ECM protein expression at both ages. Moreover, treatment with taurine reduced the TGF-beta1 mRNA levels in 24- and 30-mo-old rats by 40%. Taurine also completely blocked increases in type I and type IV collagen expression in mesangial cells in response to TGF-beta1. Our results demonstrate a protective role from both converting enzyme inhibitors and taurine in the age-related progressive renal sclerosis. In addition, taking into account that taurine is considered as an antioxidant amino acid, present data suggest a role for ROS in age-related progressive renal fibrosis, perhaps through interactions with the TGF-beta1 pathway.

Topics: Age Factors; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antioxidants; Captopril; Extracellular Matrix Proteins; Fibrosis; Kidney Cortex; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; RNA, Messenger; Taurine; Transforming Growth Factor beta

Reduction of proteinuria is a prerequisite for successful long-term renoprotection. To investigate whether individual patient factors are determinants of antiproteinuric efficacy, we analyzed individual responses to different modes of antiproteinuric intervention in nondiabetic and diabetic patients, obtained in prior studies comparing the efficacy of various pharmacological regimens. The individual antiproteinuric response to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition positively correlated to the response to angiotensin type I (AT1) receptor blockade in diabetic (r = 0.67, P < 0.01, N = 16) as well as nondiabetic patients (r = 0.75, P < 0.01, N = 12). This corresponded to the correlations for antihypertensive efficacy between ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade in diabetic (r = 0.73, P < 0.001) as well as nondiabetic patients (r = 0.55, P < 0.05). Remarkably, the antiproteinuric response to ACE inhibition also correlated positively to the antiproteinuric response to indomethacin (r = 0.63, P < 0.05, N = 9). Thus, patients responding favorably to one class of antiproteinuric drugs also respond favorably to other classes of available drugs, supporting a main role for individual patient factors in responsiveness or resistance to antiproteinuric intervention. In the search for strategies to improve response in these high risk patients, combination-treatment (combining different drugs, and combining drugs with dietary measures like sodium and protein restriction), and the use of higher doses may provide more fruitful strategies to optimize renoprotection than shifting to other classes of the available drugs.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diabetic Nephropathies; Enalapril; Humans; Indomethacin; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Losartan; Proteinuria

1. The role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in cardiac hypertrophy and nephropathy was examined in Tsukuba hypertensive mice (THM) carrying both human renin and angiotensinogen genes. 2. Tsukuba hypertensive mice were treated with 20 mg/kg per day lisinopril, 30 mg/kg per day hydralazine or nothing. Administration of drugs was performed for 6 months from 12 weeks of age; water intake and urine volume were measured and urine albumin excretion, heart to bodyweight ratio and the glomerulosclerosis index were examined. 3. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lowered by treatment with lisinopril and hydralazine. Urine volume, water intake and urinary albumin excretion were significantly decreased by lisinopril. When hydralazine was administered to THM, these parameters were transiently decreased, but eventually reached almost the same levels as those in the untreated group. The heart to bodyweight ratio was significantly decreased by lisinopril, but not by hydralazine. The glomerulosclerosis index was significantly lowered by lisinopril, but the index in the hydralazine group was not significantly different from that in the untreated group. 4. These results suggest that the RAS plays an important role in the progression of cardiac hypertrophy in THM. In addition, the RAS may also play an important role in the progression of nephropathy; however, this may also be partially regulated by elevated blood pressure in the short term.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensinogen; Animals; Blood Pressure; Cardiomegaly; Humans; Hydralazine; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Survival Rate

To evaluate the relation of tissue-localized angiotensin II (Ang II) concentration with cardiac hypertrophy and glomerulosclerosis in Tsukuba hypertensive mice (THM) carrying both human renin and angiotensinogen genes.. Thirty THM aged 12 weeks were distributed equally to a lisinopril dosage group, a hydralazine dosage group, and an untreated group. Ten age-matched C57BL/6 mice were used as normal controls. Administration was performed for 8 weeks from 12 weeks of age. All mice were euthanized at 20 week of age, and the heart-to-body weight ratio, the renal glomerulosclerosis score, tissue Ang II concentration and tissue catecholamine concentration were measured.. In the untreated group, a significant increase in every examination item was found as compared with that in C57BL/6 mice. In the lisinopril group, the observed value of every item was significantly lower than that in the untreated group. In the hydralazine group, tissue Ang II and catecholamine concentrations and the heart-to-body weight ratio were not different from those in the untreated group. Although the glomerulosclerosis score in the hydralazine group was significantly less than that in the untreated group, this was significantly higher than that in the lisinopril group.. Tissue Ang II concentration is more important than hypertension in causing cardiac hypertrophy, and both tissue Ang II level and hypertension are important in causing glomerulosclerosis in THM.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensinogen; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cardiomegaly; Catecholamines; Humans; Hydralazine; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Renin

The renal response to ACE inhibition is known to vary between individuals. The ACE genotype is a determinant of the ACE concentrations in plasma and tissue, and therefore might affect the renal response to ACE inhibition in renal patients.. To test this hypothesis we studied the short-term response to ACE inhibition (enalapril or lisinopril 10/20 mg/d) in 61 stable proteinuric patients (> 1.0 g/day) in relation to the ACE genotype (DD N = 16, ID N = 32, II N = 13).. Baseline values were not significantly different for the three groups. ACE inhibition significantly reduced proteinuria, mean arterial pressure, GFR and FF in all genotype groups. The reduction in proteinuria, MAP, GFR and FF was not different between the genotype groups. ERPF increased significantly and to the same extent in all three groups.. We conclude that in proteinuric patients the short-term responses to ACE inhibition of proteinuria, blood pressure, and renal haemodynamics are not determined by ACE genotype. Thus, ACE gene polymorphism does not account for the known interindividual variation in the short-term renal response to ACE inhibition.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Enalapril; Female; Genotype; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Polymorphism, Genetic; Proteinuria; Time Factors

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy and dietary protein restriction on nephropathy involving a remnant kidney.. Five patients with proteinuria > or = 5 years following partial removal of a solitary kidney were treated with a low-protein diet and an ACEI agent. Four patients had biopsy-proven focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The daily urinary protein excretion ranged from 1240 to 10,032 mg. The serum creatinine levels ranged from 1.2 to 3.1 mg/dL.. The post-treatment follow-up interval ranged from 18 to 30 months. The treatment regimen was well tolerated in all patients. Four patients experienced a reduction in the urinary protein level while maintaining stable overall renal function. In 1 patient, the urinary protein level increased and renal function gradually deteriorated following ACEI therapy.. These preliminary data suggest that ACEI therapy and a low-protein diet may mitigate nephropathy associated with a remnant kidney.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet, Protein-Restricted; Enalapril; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrectomy; Proteinuria

Topics: Angioedema; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Captopril; Cough; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Isoquinolines; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Otolaryngology; Quinapril; Tetrahydroisoquinolines

To clarify whether angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors prevent progressive renal injury directly by their antihypertensive effect we administered the ACE inhibitor lisinopril to male MWF/Ztm rats as a single daily dose that lowered blood pressure for only 9 of 24 h. We investigated the effects of this treatment in short- and long-term studies and compared them with another antihypertensive drug, the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine, given to partially control blood pressure as done with the ACE inhibitor. In untreated animals systemic hypertension, proteinuria, and glomerulosclerosis developed spontaneously with age, and lisinopril reduced systemic hypertension and prevented proteinuria and glomerular lesions. Nitrendipine, despite similar blood pressure control, was ineffective in preventing both proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis. After 2 mo of treatment glomerular capillary pressure was significantly reduced by lisinopril and slightly but significantly increased by nitrendipine, compared with untreated controls. The ultrafiltration coefficient was significantly higher in lisinopril than in controls and not significantly changed by nitrendipine. With both drugs, however, glomerular hemodynamic effects were observed only at a few hours after administration and were abolished before the next administration. No significant changes in glomerular tuft volume were observed in treated and untreated animals after 2 and 6 mo of observation. Thus ACE inhibitor, despite only partial control of systemic blood pressure, effectively prevented proteinuria and glomerular injury. Comparable blood pressure control obtained with a calcium channel blocker was not associated with renal protection. These results suggest that ACE inhibitors could protect glomerular microcirculation by a mechanism that is not directly related to their antihypertensive action.

Topics: Alpha-Globulins; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; Glomerulonephritis; Hemodynamics; Hypertension; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Kinetics; Lisinopril; Male; Nitrendipine; Proteinuria; Rats

This study was designed to evaluate renal functional reserve (RFR) in obstructive nephropathy using amino acid loading and the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor on RFR. We divided 24 rabbits into 4 groups, consisting of a control, 6-hours-bilateral ureteral obstruction (BUO), 24-hour BUO and 24-hour BUO pretreated with ACE inhibitor. Following the ligation of the bilateral ureters at the vesicoureteral junction, a unilateral ureter was released after a 6-hour or 24-hour duration in the obstructive groups. We measured RFR and renal vascular resistance after releasing a unilateral ureter in BUO. The baseline GFR values in the 6-hour and 24-hour BUO groups were significantly lower than that in the control. RFR were 0.34 + 0.04 ml/min/kg (control), 0.10 + 0.03 (6-hour BUO), 0.01 + 0.03 (24-hour BUO) and 0.10 + 0.01 (ACE inhibitor), respectively. RFR in the 6-hour BUO group was well preserved compared with that in the 24-hour BUO group. Pretreatment with ACE inhibitor in the 24-hour BUO group enhanced RFR to the extent of 6-hour BUO. Our results demonstrated that angiotensin II plays an important role in decreased GFR with obstructive nephropathy. Moreover, the present data suggested that evaluation of RFR might play a key role in the recovery of the post-obstructive renal function.

Topics: Animals; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Rabbits; Renal Circulation; Ureteral Obstruction; Vascular Resistance

The antihypertensive effects and pharmacokinetic properties of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, were investigated in hypertensive patients with normal renal function (NRF, mean serum creatinine 1.0 mg/dl, n = 9) and those with impaired renal function (IRF, mean serum creatinine 1.7 mg/dl, n = 8). Lisinopril was administered orally (10-mg dose once daily for 5 or 8 days). Measurement of blood pressure (BP) and sampling of blood specimens were made on the first and last days of treatment. During consecutive dosing of lisinopril, its antihypertensive effects were sustained for greater than or equal to 12 h with less diurnal variation of BP. Serum ACE activity was markedly suppressed for 24 h. Plasma levels of lisinopril in the IRF group were higher than those in NRF with significant differences in the peak levels and areas under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC). A significant inverse correlation was found between the creatinine clearance and the AUC for lisinopril. These results suggest that lisinopril has a long-lasting action and that it is a useful antihypertensive agent for controlling BP in patients with either NRF or mild IRF. When administered for an extended period, however, more careful consideration should be given to the dose in patients with IRF than in patients with NRF to minimize the possibility of untoward side effects.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antihypertensive Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Creatinine; Drug Evaluation; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged

The antihypertensive and renal effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril were studied in a group of patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension and impaired renal function. After 12 weeks of treatment, most patients had good blood pressure response to lisinopril monotherapy. During this period, correlations between antihypertensive effect, drug dose, and serum drug level were observed. These correlations were no longer evident after prolonged treatment. During a 1-year follow-up period, the drug dose was lowered gradually without losing antihypertensive effect. Hyperkalemia occurred in one third of the patients. During the 1-year follow-up, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased in two thirds of the patients and remained stable in the other third. In this latter group, the pretreatment GFR was higher, and the effective renal plasma flow had increased, whereas in the patients with a decreased GFR no renal vasodilation had occurred during lisinopril therapy. Thus, lisinopril is an effective antihypertensive drug for patients with impaired renal function. The dose should be adjusted to the pretreatment GFR, and a decrease in dosage should be considered with prolonged treatment.

Topics: Blood Pressure; Enalapril; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Time Factors

We studied the effects of lisinopril on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), plasma renin activity (PRA), and renal hemodynamics in nine patients with chronic renal disease and hypertension, before, and after three months of therapy. Lisinopril normalized blood pressure in five of nine patients (responders) and did not in the remaining four (nonresponders). PRA rose after lisinopril (4.8 +/- 2.6 ng/mL/h to 25 +/- 15 ng/mL/h, P less than 0.05) in responders, but not in nonresponders (2.0 +/- 1.4 ng/mL/h to 3.4 +/- 2.9 ng/mL/h). Glomerular filtration rate remained stable in both groups (responders: 43 +/- 11 mL/min to 43 +/- 22 mL/min; nonresponders: 39 +/- 25 mL/min to 32 +/- 21 mL/min). In the responders renal hemodynamics remained stable after lisinopril (renal plasma flow: 223 +/- 80 mL/min to 216 +/- 91 mL/min; filtration fraction: .20 +/- .04 to .20 +/- .05; renal vascular resistance: 386 +/- 179 to 326 +/- 209 units). In the nonresponders, renal plasma flow decreased (228 +/- 141 mL/min to 162 +/- 117 mL/min, P less than 0.005), filtration fraction increased (.19 +/- .08 to .24 +/- .12, P less than 0.05), and renal vascular resistance increased (695 +/- 747 to 1265 +/- 1574 units, P less than 0.05) after chronic lisinopril therapy. We conclude (1) there is a heterogeneous response to lisinopril in patients with chronic renal disease and hypertension, (2) lisinopril monotherapy may result in effective blood pressure control without renal hemodynamic compromise, and (3) an increase in PRA following converting enzyme inhibition may identify those in whom the circulating renin angiotensin system is participating in systemic hypertension and intrarenal hemodynamic changes.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Chronic Disease; Drug Evaluation; Enalapril; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension, Renal; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Middle Aged; Potassium; Proteinuria; Renin

The safety and tolerability of lisinopril (1.25-160 mg daily) were assessed in 3,270 patients (2,688 hypertensives and 582 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF] and 280 healthy subjects. The duration of therapy ranged from a single dose to 43 months; 438 patients received lisinopril for at least 12 months (mean 20 months). In the hypertensive population, the most frequent adverse events reported were headache, dizziness, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fatigue, although not all of these events were thought to be related to lisinopril; 6.1% discontinued lisinopril due to adverse clinical events, most commonly cough and nausea. Twelve hypertensive patients died (0.45%), but most of these were not receiving lisinopril at the time of death and none was considered to be drug-related. In CHF patients, the most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, hypotension and fatigue. Again, not all of these reports were considered to be drug-related. Therapy was withdrawn in 9.6% of patients--hypotension, dizziness, diarrhoea and rash being the most frequent reasons. Fifty-three CHF patients died (9.1%) and in three cases death was considered to be related to lisinopril therapy. Hypotension, orthostatic effects or dizziness following the initial dose of lisinopril occurred infrequently (in 1.3% of the hypertensive group, including those receiving hydrochlorothiazide, and in 4.8% of CHF patients). Changes in laboratory parameters were generally minor and seldom resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Long-term treatment of hypertension and CHF with lisinopril for at least 3 years confirms that the drug is well tolerated. Overall, the side-effect profile is very similar to that of other ACE inhibitors with regard to class-specific effects. However, taste disturbance was rarely observed.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Angioedema; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Enalapril; Female; Heart Failure; Hematologic Tests; Humans; Hypertension; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is excreted unchanged by the kidney. To determine how reduced renal function affects the drug's antihypertensive efficacy and safety, we studied 26 patients with hypertension associated with impaired renal function, having glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) of 60 ml/minute or less. These patients were enrolled in an open trial of 12 weeks' duration. They were given single daily doses of lisinopril, starting with 2.5 mg in patients with a GFR of less than 30 ml/minute, and 5 mg in the other patients. The dose was titrated to a maximum of 40 mg daily according to the blood pressure response. A diuretic was then added if required. Mean sitting and standing blood pressures at four, eight, and 12 weeks of treatment were significantly reduced compared with pretreatment values. The median dose of lisinopril was 10 mg daily (range, 2.5 to 40 mg), and only four patients required the addition of a diuretic. The mean GFR was unchanged during the study (36 +/- 16.4 ml/minute at baseline, 39 +/- 20.8 ml/minute after 12 weeks of treatment). Twenty-five patients completed the study. The one patient withdrew because of nausea and vomiting due to reflux esophagitis, which was probably not drug-related. Another patient had transient angioneurotic edema and continued to receive lisinopril. No clinically significant hematologic or biochemical abnormalities were observed. Sixteen patients continued to receive lisinopril for one year. Blood pressure control and GFR were well maintained throughout. Thus, in a group of patients who are often difficult to treat, lisinopril provided highly effective blood pressure control and was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Furosemide; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, were assessed in 23 patients with hypertension associated with impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate 60 ml/min or less) in an open study of 12 weeks' duration. Lisinopril was given orally in single daily doses. The starting dose was 2.5 mg in patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 30 ml/min and 5 mg in all other patients. This was titrated to a maximum of 40 mg daily according to blood pressure response. A diuretic was then added if blood pressure was not controlled. Mean sitting and standing blood pressures were significantly reduced by lisinopril treatment. The median dose of lisinopril taken was 10 mg daily (range 2.5-40 mg), and only three patients required the addition of a diuretic. The mean glomerular filtration rate was unchanged during the study (38 +/- 16.4 ml/min at baseline, 41 +/- 21.0 ml/min after 12 weeks of treatment). Twenty-two patients completed the study. One patient was withdrawn because of nausea and vomiting due to reflux oesophagitis which was probably not drug related. Another patient had transient mild angioneurotic oedema and continued on lisinopril. No clinically significant haematological or biochemical changes were observed. In conclusion, lisinopril provided effective blood pressure control and was well tolerated in this group of hypertensives who are typically difficult to treat.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Enalapril; Female; Furosemide; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension, Renal; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged

If optimal dosage administration schedules are to be defined, the factors that influence the disposition of a drug in the population of patients who are likely to receive it should first be determined. Traditionally, separate groups of patients, each with different underlying disease, are given the drug and then detailed studies are performed to assess which groups have significantly different pharmacokinetic parameters and therefore require an adjustment in dose. An alternative approach, utilizing large groups of patients studied less intensively, will be described here. The analysis used the results of two multicenter trials of lisinopril: one in elderly (greater than 65 years) hypertensive patients and one in a group of hypertensive patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance rate less than 60 ml/min). Both protocols allowed for a stepwise increase in the dose of lisinopril until optimum control of BP was achieved. Required dosages ranged from 2.5 to 40 mg/day. During the course of therapy, regular trough concentrations were analyzed to assess compliance and a steady-state profile was determined during one dosage interval. Only patients who appeared to be compliant on the basis of multiple trough concentrations were used in the analysis. Data from a total of 53 patients were used, of whom 35 took part in the elderly study, and 18 in the renal study. There were 25 men and 28 women in this combined study group with ages ranging from 21 to 85 years (mean 65 years) and weights from 51 to 115 kg (mean 72 kg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Lisinopril; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged