lisinopril has been researched along with Renal-Insufficiency* in 11 studies
3 trial(s) available for lisinopril and Renal-Insufficiency
Article | Year |
---|---|
ACE inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade: impact on potassium in renal failure. VAL-K Study Group.
Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is known to raise serum potassium [K(+)] levels in patients with renal insufficiency or diabetes. No study has evaluated the comparative effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor versus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on the changes in serum [K(+)] in people with renal insufficiency.. The study was a multicenter, randomized, double crossover design, with each period lasting one month. A total of 35 people (21 males and 14 females, 19 African Americans and 16 Caucasian) participated, with the mean age being 56 +/- 2 years. Mean baseline serum [K(+)] was 4.4 +/- 0.1 mEq/L. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 65 +/- 5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and blood pressure was 150 +/- 2/88 +/- 1 mm Hg. The main outcome measure was the difference from baseline in the level of serum [K+], plasma aldosterone, and GFR following the initial and crossover periods.. For the total group, serum [K(+)] changes were not significantly different between the lisinopril or valsartan treatments. The subgroup with GFR values of < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who received lisinopril demonstrated significant increases in serum [K(+)] of 0.28 mEq/L above the mean baseline of 4.6 mEq/L (P = 0.04). This increase in serum [K(+)] was also accompanied by a decrease in plasma aldosterone (P = 0.003). Relative to the total group, the change in serum [K(+)] from baseline to post-treatment in the lisinopril group was higher among those with GFR values of < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The lower GFR group taking valsartan, however, demonstrated a smaller rise in serum [K(+)], 0.12 mEq/L above baseline (P = 0.1), a 43% lower value when compared with the change in those who received lisinopril. This blunted rise in [K(+)] in people taking valsartan was not associated with a significant decrease in plasma aldosterone (P = 0.14).. In the presence of renal insufficiency, the ARB valsartan did not raise serum [K(+)] to the same degree as the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. This differential effect on serum [K(+)] is related to a relatively smaller reduction in plasma aldosterone by the ARB and is not related to changes in GFR. This study provides evidence that increases in serum [K(+)] are less likely with ARB therapy compared with ACE inhibitor therapy in people with renal insufficiency. Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Potassium; Renal Insufficiency; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan | 2000 |
Comparison between the effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on proteinuria in nondiabetic renal failure: a double-blind, randomized prospective study.
Double-blind, randomized controlled studies of longer than 1 week in duration comparing the antiproteinuric potential of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with that of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are lacking. Therefore, we performed such a study in patients with nondiabetic renal disease and proteinuria. After a 4-week wash-out period in which patients did not use any medication known to affect proteinuria, 21 patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either the calcium channel blocker amlodipine (Amlo, 5 to 10 mg) or the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril (Lis, 5 to 10 mg). Throughout the 16-week study period, blood pressure, creatinine clearances, and proteinuria were measured every 2 weeks. In addition, device-measured blood pressure and renal hemodynamic studies were performed at the start and end of the study. Systolic blood pressure fell in the Lis group from 163+/-7 (SEM) to 140+/-8 mm Hg (P < .01) and from 157+/-10 to 147+/-6 mm Hg in the Amlo group; diastolic blood pressure fell from 101+/-3 to 86+/-7 mm Hg in the Lis group and from 98+/-3 to 91+/-2 mm Hg in the Amlo group. Renal hemodynamics were not affected by amlodipine treatment, whereas a fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was seen in lisinopril-treated patients (from 55+/-11 to 50+/-10 mL/min; P < .01). Amlodipine did not significantly affect proteinuria. Lisinopril induced a decline in the protein-creatinine ratio with a maximal effect reached after 12 to 16 weeks of therapy (from 0.39+/-0.17 to 0.26 +/-0.11 g/mmol; P < .009). In conclusion, we could not demonstrate an antiproteinuric effect of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine, whereas therapy with the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril resulted in a decrease in proteinuria. Amlodipine did not affect renal hemodynamics, whereas lisinopril induced a fall in GFR. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Renal Insufficiency | 1998 |
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril in advanced renal failure. Consequence of dose adjustment.
To prevent drug accumulation and adverse effects the dose of hydrophilic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, e.g. lisinopril, must be reduced in patients with renal failure. To obtain a rational basis for dose recommendations, we undertook a prospective clinical trial. After 15 days of lisinopril treatment pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined in patients with advanced renal failure (n = 8; endogenous creatinine clearance [CLCR]: 18 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2) and in healthy subjects with normal renal function (n = 16; CLCR: 107 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2). The volunteers received 10 mg lisinopril once daily, the daily dose in patients (1.1-2.2 mg) was adjusted to the individual CLCR according to the method of Dettli [13]. After 15 days of lisinopril treatment the mean maximal serum concentration (Cmax) in patients was lower than in volunteers (30.7 vs 40.7 ng.ml-1, while the mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24 h) was higher (525 vs 473 ng.h-1.ml-1). ACE activity on day 15 was almost completely inhibited in both groups. Plasma renin activity, angiotensin I and angiotensin II levels documented marked inhibition of converting enzyme in volunteers and patients. Furthermore, average mean arterial blood pressure in patients decreased by 5 mmHg and proteinuria from 3.9-2.7 g per 24 h after 15 days of treatment with the reduced dose of lisinopril. Adjustment of the dose of lisinopril prevents significant accumulation of the drug in patients with advanced renal failure during chronic therapy. Mean serum levels did not exceed this in subjects with normal renal function receiving a standard dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Topics: Adult; Angiotensins; Blood Pressure; Humans; Lisinopril; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency | 1994 |
8 other study(ies) available for lisinopril and Renal-Insufficiency
Article | Year |
---|---|
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use in a Patient With Hypertension: A Teachable Moment.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Interactions; Humans; Hypertension; Lisinopril; Male; Meloxicam; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Management; Renal Insufficiency; Thiazines; Thiazoles | 2015 |
ACE-inhibitor therapy at relatively high doses and risk of renal worsening in chronic heart failure.
Renoprotective effect of ACE-inhibitors has been questioned in case of decreased effective circulating volume, like in right or biventricular chronic heart failure.. To detect clinical predictors of renal worsening in CHF patient population characterized by two types of ACE-inhibitor dosing regimens.. According to a retrospective cohort design, we followed 2 groups of patients with CHF - whether right or biventricular -, all in III NYHA class treated with ACE-inhibitors (enalapril or lisinopril), and with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, by distinguishing them by ACE-inhibitor dosing: average-low (<10 mg per day) or "high" dose (>10 mg per day) of enalapril or lisinopril. Worsened renal failure (ARD) was defined by Cr increase >30% from baseline. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the predictors of ARD among the following variables: ACE-inhibitors "high" dose, age, basal LVEF, history of repeated intensive intravenous loop diuretic therapies (IV diur), diabetes, basal Cr, history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg.. 57 patients were recruited, of whom 15 were treated with ACE-inhibitor "high" dose. During a mean follow-up of 718 days, ARD occurred in 17 (29.8%) patients. Only ACE-inhibitor "high" dose (HR: 12.4681 C.I.: 2.1614-71.9239 p=0.0050) and basal Cr (HR: 1.2344 C.I.: 1.0414-1.4632 p=0.0157) were shown to predict ARD. Moreover, ACE-inhibitor "high" doses were shown to fail to predict ARD in both CHF without IV diur and CHF with diabetes.. In III NYHA class CHF, ACE-inhibitor "high" doses and a higher basal Cr predicted ARD. Nephrotoxicity related to ACE-inhibitor "high" doses was increased by IV diur, whereas it was not detected in CHF patients with diabetes. Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus; Diuretics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Reference Values; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors | 2011 |
Complete remission of non-HIV collapsing glomerulopathy with deflazacort and lisinopril in an adult patient.
Collapsing glomerulopathy is a form of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis that is usually associated with HIV-1 infection, and is characterized by its poor prognosis and almost inevitable progression to end-stage renal disease. Its pathological features include collapsed glomeruli, podocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and pseudocrescents. This case report shows the evolution of a 58-year-old patient with non-HIV idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy who presented with severe nephrotic syndrome and renal insufficiency and was treated with lisinopril and deflazacort, a synthetic corticosteroid that has shown fewer cosmetic effects and glucose and bone metabolism complications than prednisone. The patient responded with full recovery of renal function and normal range of protein excreted in urine after less than two years of treatment. The patient has not suffered a recurrence of his nephrotic syndrome after three years of steroid withdrawal. There is no proven therapy for collapsing glomerulopathy, and this case highlights an alternative for treating this disease with few secondary effects. Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glomerulonephritis; Humans; Kidney; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrotic Syndrome; Pregnenediones; Renal Insufficiency; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome | 2010 |
Myocardial infarction does not further impair renal damage in 5/6 nephrectomized rats.
Recent observational studies show that reduced renal function is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Previously, we reported that myocardial infarction (MI) indeed enhanced mild renal function decline in rats after unilateral nephrectomy (NX) and that RAAS intervention inhibited this decline. The effects of an MI on pre-existing severe renal function loss and the effects of RAAS intervention interrupting this hypothesized cardiorenal interaction are however unknown and clinically even more relevant.. Male Wistar rats underwent MI, sham MI, 5/6NX, or 5/6NX and MI. Six weeks later, the NX rats were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or vehicle for 6 weeks.. An MI did not significantly induce more proteinuria (303 +/- 46 versus 265 +/- 24 mg/24 h) and glomerulosclerosis (40 +/- 11 versus 28 +/- 4 arbitrary units) in 5/6NX+MI compared to 5/6NX, and ACEi therapy was equally effective in reducing renal damage in these groups. In the 5/6NX+MI group, decreased renal blood flow and creatinine clearance were observed compared to 5/6NX (2.2 +/- 0.6 versus 3.6 +/- 0.4 ml/min/kg and 2.1 +/- 0.3 versus 2.9 +/- 0.3 ml/min/kg), which both increased after ACEi to levels comparable found in the group that underwent 5/6NX alone.. MI does not further deteriorate structural renal damage induced by 5/6NX compared with 5/6NX alone. Furthermore, renal haemodynamic impairment occurs after MI, which can be improved applying ACEi therapy. Therefore, we conclude that treatment with ACEi should be optimized in patients with chronic kidney disease after MI to improve renal function. Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Creatinine; Hemodynamics; Lisinopril; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Nephrectomy; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renal Insufficiency; Renin-Angiotensin System | 2008 |
A study of the prevalence of significant increases in serum creatinine following angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor administration.
Angiontension-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are beneficial in the treatment of diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. One adverse effect of ACEIs use is a rise in serum creatinine and potential renal failure. This paper attempts to quantify this risk and assess the need for pre- and post-ACEI serum creatinine measurements. A computerized search of Kaiser Permanente Northwest's electronic medical record was conducted to find patients over the age of 40 years taking lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. Patient demographic information and presence in diabetes and coronary artery disease registries was collected. A subsequent search for pre- and postlisinopril serum creatinine levels within 6 months of initial lisinopril prescription was conducted. Patients with prelisinopril creatinine < or = 1.2 mg/dl and postlisinopril creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl underwent chart review to discern adverse events associated with the rise in serum creatinine. A total of 18,977 patients were prescribed lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. In all 13 166 patients had a pre- and postlisinopril creatinine checked. In all, 31 patients had a rise in creatinine from < or = 1.2 mg/dl to > 2.5 mg/dl (0.2%). Possible contributors to rise in creatinine included congestive heart failure, dehydration and infection. No patients developed end-stage renal disease, although three died. In conclusion, end-stage renal disease is an unlikely outcome among patients prescribed lisinopril and is most likely associated with other events. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biomarkers; Coronary Artery Disease; Creatinine; Diabetes Complications; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; United States | 2005 |
Progression of renal failure with anaemia and multiple effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in rats with renal mass reduction.
Several factors such as proteinuria and renal fibrosis may be important in the progression of many forms of chronic renal diseases. The purposes of the current study were to investigate the progressive renal failure of the rats with surgical renal mass reduction (RMR) and the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, lisinopril, and to document correlation of several factors associated with progressive renal failure. Rats were subtotal (5/6) nephrectomized by resection of the renal poles and sham-operated. The functional, histological and haematological changes of the rats were studied for up to 10 weeks. After 2 weeks of RMR, oral administration of lisinopril (10 mg kg(-1) per day) was performed for 8 weeks. RMR resulted in progressive renal failure with proteinuria, monocyte/macrophage (ED1+) infiltration, anaemia as assessed by haemoglobin and haematocrit (Htc), renal hypertrophy as assessed by left kidney to body weight ratio (BKW/BW), and renal fibrosis as assessed by glomerular lesions and tubulointerstitial changes. Lisinopril exhibited renoprotection with antiproteinuric effect and inhibition of monocyte/macrophage (ED1+) infiltration. However, beneficial effect of lisinopril on anaemia was not observed. At 10 weeks after surgery, severity of proteinuria positively correlated with plasma creatinine (Pcr), BKW/BW, histological damage, and systolic blood pressure, and negatively correlated with haemoglobin. Severity of tubulointerstitial changes positively correlated with Pcr and blood urea nitrogen, and negatively correlated with haemoglobin and Htc. Moreover, monocyte/macrophage (ED1+) infiltration positively correlated with severity of proteinuria and tubulointerstitial changes. These findings strongly support that proteinuria, monocyte/macrophage infiltration and renal fibrosis appear to play principal roles in the progressive renal failure with anaemia and renoprotection of ACE inhibition may be mediated by multiple actions of ACE inhibitor. The present study confirms that rats with RMR is useful to explore target molecules for renoprotective drugs and evaluate renoprotective effect of new molecular entities. Topics: Analysis of Variance; Anemia; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Kidney; Lisinopril; Male; Proteinuria; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renal Insufficiency | 2003 |
ACE inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade: impact on potassium in renal failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Lisinopril; Potassium; Renal Insufficiency; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan | 2001 |
Effect of ACE inhibitors on atrial natriuretic factor in the brains of rats with reduced renal mass.
We tested the effect of renal insufficiency, with and without angiotensin (Ang) converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, on blood and brain atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) in rats. Two ACEs, one which penetrates into the CNS and one which does not, were used to distinguish between peripheral and central ACE effects. Rats underwent 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6-NPX) by ligation of renal arterial branches. After seven days, 28 5/6-NPX rats received lisinopril 20 mg/kg/day and 28 5/6-NPX rats received quinapril 30 mg/kg/day orally for five days, while 28 5/6-NPX control rats and 28 sham rats did not. Body weight, blood pressure, drinking and urine volume were monitored. At sacrifice, urine, plasma, and brain tissue was collected. ANF in 16 brain areas was measured by radioimmunoassay. 5/6-NPX resulted in increased blood pressure, increased urine volume, proteinuria, and increased drinking. Both ACEs lowered blood pressure to sham values and decreased proteinuria. Both ACEs increased plasma renin activity and decreased plasma ANF. However, only lisinopril decreased drinking and urine volume. 5/6-NPX increased ANF values in six brain areas, namely the periventricular preoptic nucleus, the arcuate nucleus, the perifornical nucleus, the periventricular hypothalamic nucleus, the paraventricular nucleus, and the dorsal raphe nucleus compared to sham rats. These same increases in brain ANF were also observed in 5/6-NPX rats given quinapril, compared to shams. However, lisinopril lowered ANF to sham levels in the periventricular preoptic nucleus, the arcuate nucleus, and the perifornical nucleus. In the three additional brain areas, namely the periventricular hypothalamic nucleus, the paraventricular nucleus, and the dorsal raphe nucleus, lisinopril did not effect the elevated ANF concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain; Dipeptides; Drinking; Isoquinolines; Lisinopril; Male; Nephrectomy; Quinapril; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renal Insufficiency; Tetrahydroisoquinolines | 1993 |