lisinopril and Deglutition-Disorders

Dysphagia (swallowing problems), which is common after stroke, is associated with increased risk of death or dependency, occurrence of pneumonia, poor quality of life, and longer hospital stay. Treatments provided to improve dysphagia are aimed at accelerating recovery of swallowing function and reducing these risks. This is an update of the review first published in 1999 and updated in 2012.. To assess the effects of swallowing therapy on death or dependency among stroke survivors with dysphagia within six months of stroke onset.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (26 June 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 6) in the Cochrane Library (searched 26 June 2018), MEDLINE (26 June 2018), Embase (26 June 2018), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (26 June 2018), Web of Science Core Collection (26 June 2018), SpeechBITE (28 June 2016), ClinicalTrials.Gov (26 June 2018), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (26 June 2018). We also searched Google Scholar (7 June 2018) and the reference lists of relevant trials and review articles.. We sought to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for people with dysphagia and recent stroke (within six months).. Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence, and resolved disagreements through discussion with the third review author (PB). We used random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and standardised mean differences (SMDs), and provided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each.The primary outcome was functional outcome, defined as death or dependency (or death or disability), at the end of the trial. Secondary outcomes were case fatality at the end of the trial, length of inpatient stay, proportion of participants with dysphagia at the end of the trial, swallowing ability, penetration aspiration score, or pneumonia, pharyngeal transit time, institutionalisation, and nutrition.. We added 27 new studies (1777 participants) to this update to include a total of 41 trials (2660 participants).We assessed the efficacy of swallowing therapy overall and in subgroups by type of intervention: acupuncture (11 studies), behavioural interventions (nine studies), drug therapy (three studies), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES; six studies), pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES; four studies), physical stimulation (three studies), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; two studies), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; nine studies).Swallowing therapy had no effect on the primary outcome (death or dependency/disability at the end of the trial) based on data from one trial (two data sets) (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.75; 306 participants; 2 studies; I² = 0%; P = 0.86; moderate-quality evidence). Swallowing therapy had no effect on case fatality at the end of the trial (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.52; 766 participants; 14 studies; I² = 6%; P = 0.99; moderate-quality evidence). Swallowing therapy probably reduced length of inpatient stay (MD -2.9, 95% CI -5.65 to -0.15; 577 participants; 8 studies; I² = 11%; P = 0.04; moderate-quality evidence). Researchers found no evidence of a subgroup effect based on testing for subgroup differences (P = 0.54). Swallowing therapy may have reduced the proportion of participants with dysphagia at the end of the trial (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.55; 1487 participants; 23 studies; I² = 0%; P = 0.00001; low-quality evidence). Trial results show no evidence of a subgroup effect based on testing for subgroup differences (P = 0.91). Swallowing therapy may improve swallowing ability (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.32; 1173 participants; 26 studies; I² = 86%; P = 0.0002; very low-quality evidence). We found no evidence of a subgroup effect based on testing for subgroup differences (P = 0.09). We noted moderate to substantial heterogeneity between trials for these interventions. Swallowing therapy did not reduce the penetration aspiration score (i.e. it did not reduce radiological aspiration) (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.00; 303 participants; 11 studies; I² = 46%; P = 0.05; low-quality evidence). Swallowing therapy may reduce the incidence of chest infection or pneumonia (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.78; 618 participants; 9 studies; I² = 59%; P = 0.009; very low-quality evidence).. Moderate- and low-quality evidence suggests that swallowing therapy did not have a significant effect on the outcomes of death or dependency/disability, case fatality at the end of the trial, or penetration aspiration score. However, swallowing therapy may have reduced length of hospital stay, dysphagia, and chest infections, and may have improved swallowing ability. However, these results are based on evidence of variable quality, involving a variety of interventions. Further high-quality trials are needed to test whether specific interventions are effective.

Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Acute Disease; Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Gastrostomy; Humans; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Length of Stay; Lisinopril; Metoclopramide; Nifedipine; Physical Stimulation; Pneumonia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation; Time Factors; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

To examine if angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor reduces the risk of pneumonia in older patients on tube-feeding because of dysphagia from cerebrovascular diseases.. Randomized placebo-controlled trial.. Acute and subacute geriatrics units, speech therapists' clinic, and nursing home.. Older patients on tube-feeding for >2 weeks because of dysphagia secondary to cerebrovascular diseases.. Participants were randomized to lisinopril 2.5 mg or placebo once daily for 26 weeks.. Participants were followed up at weeks 12 and 26. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of pneumonia as determined by pneumonic changes on x-ray and clinical criteria. The secondary outcomes were mortality rate and swallowing ability as defined by the Royal Brisbane Hospital Outcome Measure for Swallowing at week 12.. A total of 93 older patients were randomized. In interim analysis, 71 completed the trial, whereas 15 had dropped out. Among those who had completed the trial, odds ratio (OR) for death was significantly higher in the intervention group (unadjusted OR 2.94, P = .030; fully adjusted OR 7.79, P = .018). There was no difference in the incidence of pneumonia or fatal pneumonia in the 2 groups. The intervention group had a marginally better swallowing function at week 12 (Royal Brisbane Hospital Outcome Measure for Swallowing score: 4.2 ± 1.5 in intervention group, 3.5 ± 1.5 in placebo group, P = .053). As a result of the interim finding on mortality, the trial was prematurely terminated with 7 participants still in the trial.. Low dose lisinopril given to older tube-fed patients with neurologic dysphagia resulted in increased mortality, although swallowing function showed marginal improvement. ACE inhibitors did not prevent pneumonia in older patients with neurologic dysphagia and might increase mortality.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Deglutition Disorders; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Incidence; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effects of acute pressor and depressor blood pressure (BP) manipulation on 2-week death and dependency following acute stroke and investigate the safety and efficacy of such treatments.. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled titrated-dose trial.. Five hospitals in England.. Patients over 18 years admitted to hospital with a clinical diagnosis of suspected stroke and either (1) symptom onset < 36 hours and hypertension, defined as systolic BP (SBP) < 160 mmHg (depressor arm), or (2) symptom onset < 12 hours and hypotension, defined as SBP < or = 140 mmHg (pressor arm).. Patients were allocated to either the pressor or the depressor arm depending on blood pressure at randomisation. The ratio of allocation to active intervention versus matched placebo was 2:1 for the depressor arm and 1:1 for the pressor arm.. The primary end point was death and dependency at 2 weeks, with dependency defined as a modified Rankin score < 3. Secondary end points were the safety of acute pressor (0-12 hours post stroke) and depressor (0-36 hours post stroke) BP manipulation in stroke patients; whether effects of BP reduction are influenced by stroke type (ischaemic versus haemorrhagic); whether alternative routes for administration of antihypertensive therapy (including sublingual and intravenous) are effective in dysphagic stroke patients; whether effects of BP manipulation are influenced by the time to treatment; and the short- and medium-term cost-effectiveness of such therapy in the acute post-stroke period on subsequent disability or death.. 180 patients were recruited over the 36-month trial period, 179 in the depressor arm and one in the pressor arm (who received placebo). No significant difference was found in death or dependency at 2 weeks between those receiving active depressor treatment with lisinopril or labetalol and those receiving placebo, although numbers recruited to the trial were lower than projected. Active treatment was not associated with an increase in early neurological deterioration despite significantly greater reductions in BP at 24 hours and 2 weeks with active therapy compared with placebo. Active treatment was generally well tolerated and treatment discontinuation rates were similar in active and placebo groups. Survival analysis showed that the active treatment group had a lower mortality at 3 months than the placebo group (p = 0.05). The pressor arm was closed early because of problems with recruitment, so no conclusions can be drawn regarding this therapy.. Oral and sublingual lisinopril and oral and intravenous labetalol are effective BP-lowering agents in acute cerebral infarction and haemorrhage and do not increase the likelihood of early neurological deterioration. The study was not sufficiently powered to detect a difference in disability or death at 2 weeks. However, the 3-month difference in mortality in favour of active treatment is of interest, although care must be taken in interpretation of the results. Further work is needed to confirm this and to assess whether there are differences in the effectiveness of labetalol compared with lisinopril in terms of reducing death or dependency after acute stroke, and whether the introduction of treatment post stroke earlier than was achieved here would be of greater benefit.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cardiotonic Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Deglutition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Hypertension; Hypotension; Infusions, Intravenous; Labetalol; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylephrine; Placebos; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Deglutition Disorders; Female; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Pneumonia, Aspiration

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Deglutition Disorders; Female; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Pneumonia, Aspiration

Inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme may rarely cause an angioneurotic oedema of the upper aerodigestive tract. The pathomechanism of this side effect depends on an interaction of the drug with hormones regulating the vascular resistance such as the kallikrein kinin system and the prostaglandin system. Anglo-oedema is characterised by subcutaneous or submucosal swelling, which preferably affects the lips, the soft palate, the tongue and the larynx. Pathomechanisms, differential diagnosis and treatment of ACE-inhibitor induced oedema of the upper aerodigestive tract are described by means of 3 case reports.

Topics: Airway Obstruction; Angioedema; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Captopril; Deglutition Disorders; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged