lisinopril has been researched along with Coronary-Artery-Disease* in 9 studies
2 trial(s) available for lisinopril and Coronary-Artery-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
[The Antihypertensive Effect of the Fixed Combination of Lisinopril and Amlodipine in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].
Literature data and results of our own register have indicate that hypertension is one of the most common risk factor in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). But despite proven benefits of control of hypertension after CABG adherence of patients to corresponding recommendations remains low. Fixed combinations of antihypertensive drugs are associated with better compliance. In 30 IHD patients after CABG we studied effects of fixed lisinoprillamlodipine combination. This combination was safe and had high antihypertensive activity. Practically all patients responded to therapy and achieved target level of arterial pressure. Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Postoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome | 2015 |
Impact of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia on vascular responses in patients with coronary artery disease: effects of ACE inhibitors and fibrates.
We analyzed vascular responses (endothelial function, oxidant stress) to postprandial hypertriglyceridemia (PHTG) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to reveal potential therapeutical effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (ACE-I) and of lipid lowering (fibrate). The study population (n=39, mean age: 60 years) consisted of four groups, all of which had angiographically documented CAD. A high fat group (n=9) consumed a high fat meal, a low fat group (n=9) a low fat meal, and ACE-I (n=10) or fibrate (n=11) groups consumed a high fat meal plus lisinopril or fenofibrate. Serum triglycerides (TG) increased significantly 2 h after eating a test meal in all groups with the exception of the low fat group. In the high and low fat groups changes of serum TG were positively correlated (r=0.664, P<0.005) with changes of phorbol ester-activated leukocyte superoxide anion radical (O(2-.)) formation and were negatively correlated (r=-0.488, P<0.05) with flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (FMD). There was a negative correlation (r=-0.419, P=0.094) between FMD and changes of O(2-.) formation in the high and low fat groups. In the ACE-I and fibrate groups, O(2-.) formation decreased 2 h after eating a test meal (from 5.34+/-1.01 to 3.81+/-1.15 nmol/10(6)cells per min, P<0.01, and from 4.66+/-0.91 to 4.26+/-0.97 nmol/10(6)cells per min, P=0.374, respectively). However, endothelial function did not show any significant changes 2 h after eating a test meal in all groups. PHTG increases oxidant stress and further deteriorates endothelial function, even in patients with CAD. Both ACE-I and fibrates have an antioxidant effect but no acute beneficial effects in terms of endothelial function under conditions of PHTG in CAD patients. Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Flow Velocity; Coronary Artery Disease; Dietary Fats; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Fenofibrate; Humans; Hypertriglyceridemia; Hypolipidemic Agents; Leukocytes; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Oxidative Stress; Postprandial Period; Superoxides; Vasodilation | 2001 |
7 other study(ies) available for lisinopril and Coronary-Artery-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
A rare case of biventricular non-compaction.
Topics: Cardiomyopathies; Carvedilol; Coronary Artery Disease; Dyspnea; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | 2020 |
Renoprevention: A new concept for reengineering nephrology care--an economic impact and patient outcome analysis of two hypothetical patient management paradigms in the CCU.
The impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression remains uncertain; the common belief is that AKI in CKD is short-lived with subsequent full recovery. However 25.2% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Medicare patients all experienced antecedent AKI. We recently described a new syndrome of ESRD following AKI, the syndrome of rapid-onset end-stage renal disease (SORO-ESRD). Renoprevention, which we described in 2009, is the application of preventative measures to reduce AKI incidence.. This is a descriptive study based on real clinical experience. Two hypothetical 69-year-old Caucasian male patients, A and B, with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) presented for elective cardiac catheterization and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft procedures; renoprevention was applied in patient A but not in B.. Aggressive fluid repletion, withholding Lisinopril 40 mg once daily (QD) 1 week before hospitalization (hydralazine substituted) in A-earlier discharge after 6 days, transient minimal change in serum creatinine. Patient B continued on Lisinopril 40 mg QD, experienced prolonged hypotension needing pressors-severe oliguric AKI, volume overload, daily RRT for 6 days, recovered kidney function, was discharged after 20 days. Hospital charges were $68,580 (A) versus $154,650 (B). If patient B had developed ESRD (SORO-ESRD), the savings would be humongous.. A more forceful and pragmatic application of renoprevention strategies in the coronary care unit (CCU)-preemptive withholding of nephrotoxics including renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, aggressive prevention of perioperative hypotension, avoiding nephrotoxic exposure as contrast, and antibiotics-leads to less AKI, potentially less SORO-ESRD, better patient outcomes, and massive dollar savings. Such paradigm shifts would constitute major rethinking in current nephrology practice, a form of nephrology practice reengineering. Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Care Units; Creatinine; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hospital Charges; Humans; Incidence; Lisinopril; Male; Nephrology; Prognosis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Research Design; Risk Factors; Wisconsin | 2013 |
Challenge. What is your diagnosis? Answer. Primary nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with secondary cutaneous involvement.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Diuretics; Exanthema; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Lisinopril; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Skin Neoplasms; Sotalol; Stents; Ticlopidine | 2009 |
CX3CR1 receptor is up-regulated in monocytes of coronary artery diseased patients: impact of pre-inflammatory stimuli and renin-angiotensin system modulators.
Fractalkine/CX3CR1 pathway is considered a major modulator of atherosclerosis. In the present study, expression of CX3CR1 on PBMCs/monocytes of healthy individuals and coronary artery diseased patients was initially assessed by flow cytometry. Effects of pre-inflammatory cytokines interferon (INF)-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha on expression of CX3CR1 and a single representative of each major chemokine family (CCR5 and CXCR4) were further assessed in three cell models: THP-1 monocytes, Jurkat T lymphocytes and primary monocytes isolated from healthy donors. Finally, effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, lisinopril and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) losartan on chemokine receptor expression were evaluated in the same cell models either in a naive or stimulated state. INF-gamma significantly affected the chemokine receptor phenotype of THP-1 cells by increasing the rate of CX3CR1-positive cells. Pre-treatment with the ACE inhibitors, captopril and lisinopril, and the ARB, losartan, did not influence these effects. Captopril and lisinopril similarly had no effect on either stimulated or naive primary monocytes. Yet, a small but repeatable increase in CX3CR1 expression after treatment with losartan was noted. Nevertheless, the latter observation did not retain statistical significance after applying the Bonferroni correction. In conclusion, our data did not indicate any significant effect of the ACE inhibitors on the chemokine receptor phenotype of monocytes. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Captopril; Case-Control Studies; Cell Line; Coronary Artery Disease; CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Inflammation Mediators; Interferon-gamma; Jurkat Cells; Lisinopril; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Monocytes; Receptors, Chemokine; Recombinant Proteins; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Up-Regulation | 2007 |
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy for coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
To use a population management strategy to increase the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes receiving target-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy and to assess the safety and tolerability of this initiative.. Prospective cohort.. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were not receiving target-dose ACE inhibitor therapy. Clinical pharmacy specialists were responsible for initiation, titration, and appropriate follow-up of ACE inhibitor therapy.. A total of 453 subjects were enrolled. Their mean age was 67.9 years and 77% were male. At baseline, 30.9% (n = 140) of eligible patients were on no ACE inhibitor therapy and no patients were at the target dose. The mean systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, and serum potassium values were 128.0 mm Hg, 1.0 mg/dL, and 4.4 mEq/dL, respectively. At follow-up, 8.2% (n = 37; P < .001) were on no ACE inhibitor therapy and 68.7% (n = 311; P < .001) of patients had achieved the target dose. From baseline to follow-up, mean systolic blood pressure decreased 4.4 mm Hg (P < .001). Changes in serum potassium or creatinine were not clinically significant. Of the 142 subjects unable to achieve the target dose, 31 experienced hypotension, 29 did not have the dose increased because of the potential for hypotension, and 23 experienced cough.. A population management approach to increasing the proportion of patients with CAD and diabetes who receive target-dose ACE inhibitor therapy was effective and safe. Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiotonic Agents; Colorado; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Evaluation; Female; Health Maintenance Organizations; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies | 2007 |
A study of the prevalence of significant increases in serum creatinine following angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor administration.
Angiontension-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are beneficial in the treatment of diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. One adverse effect of ACEIs use is a rise in serum creatinine and potential renal failure. This paper attempts to quantify this risk and assess the need for pre- and post-ACEI serum creatinine measurements. A computerized search of Kaiser Permanente Northwest's electronic medical record was conducted to find patients over the age of 40 years taking lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. Patient demographic information and presence in diabetes and coronary artery disease registries was collected. A subsequent search for pre- and postlisinopril serum creatinine levels within 6 months of initial lisinopril prescription was conducted. Patients with prelisinopril creatinine < or = 1.2 mg/dl and postlisinopril creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl underwent chart review to discern adverse events associated with the rise in serum creatinine. A total of 18,977 patients were prescribed lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. In all 13 166 patients had a pre- and postlisinopril creatinine checked. In all, 31 patients had a rise in creatinine from < or = 1.2 mg/dl to > 2.5 mg/dl (0.2%). Possible contributors to rise in creatinine included congestive heart failure, dehydration and infection. No patients developed end-stage renal disease, although three died. In conclusion, end-stage renal disease is an unlikely outcome among patients prescribed lisinopril and is most likely associated with other events. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biomarkers; Coronary Artery Disease; Creatinine; Diabetes Complications; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; United States | 2005 |
Clinical pharmacy specialist implementation of lisinopril therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
As the results of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation trial suggested that patients with both coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus would benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy, our objective was to increase the percentage of patients with both of these conditions receiving the goal dosage (20 mg/day) or highest tolerated dosage of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril through intervention of a clinical pharmacy service.. Prospective study with historic comparison (control group).. Clinical Pharmacy Cardiac Risk Service.. Hospitalized patients with CAD and type 2 diabetes mellitus.. At hospital discharge, lisinopril 5 mg/day was started in eligible patients; the drug was titrated to a goal dosage of 20 mg/day or the highest tolerated dosage. Potassium level, serum creatinine level, and blood pressure were monitored at baseline, at each dosage titration, and 2 weeks after the goal or highest tolerated dosage was reached. The group receiving usual care (control group) consisted of 95 patients; the treatment group had 101 patients. At baseline, 19 patients (20%) in the control group were receiving the goal dosage of lisinopril, 34 (36%) were taking a suboptimal dosage, 16 (17%) were excluded from treatment, and 26 (27%) were eligible but were not receiving lisinopril therapy. After 9 months, ACE inhibitor dosages had changed minimally in the control group. In the treatment group, at baseline, 37 patients (36%) were at their goal dosage and therefore titration was not necessary; 15 (15%) were receiving a suboptimal dosage, 35 (35%) were excluded from treatment, and 14 (14%) were eligible but not receiving therapy. After the titration period, 55 (54%) treatment group patients were at the goal dosage, 11 (11%) were taking a suboptimal dosage, and 35 (35%) were not candidates for ACE inhibitor therapy. The most common reasons for exclusion were renal insufficiency, cough, and baseline hypotension. Changes in potassium level, serum creatinine level, and blood pressure were not significant during the study.. The clinical pharmacy service more than doubled the number of patients with CAD and diabetes who achieved the goal dosage of an ACE inhibitor, a drug class that has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; Prospective Studies | 2003 |