Page last updated: 2024-11-11

abiraterone acetate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Abiraterone Acetate: An androstene derivative that inhibits STEROID 17-ALPHA-HYDROXYLASE and is used as an ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant PROSTATE CANCER. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

abiraterone acetate : A sterol ester obtained by formal condensation of the 3-hydroxy group of abiraterone with the carboxy group of acetic acid. A prodrug that is converted in vivo into abiraterone. Used for treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID9821849
CHEMBL ID271227
CHEBI ID68639
SCHEMBL ID93715
MeSH IDM0562608

Synonyms (94)

Synonym
nsc 748121
em5ocb9yj6 ,
abiraterone acetate [usan]
yonsa
unii-em5ocb9yj6
nsc 749227
HY-75054
androsta-5,16-dien-3-ol, 17-(3-pyridinyl)-, acetate (ester), (3beta)-
abiraterone acetate
cb-7630
cb 7630
zytiga
jnj-2012082
nsc-749227
CHEMBL271227
nsc-748121
chebi:68639 ,
cb7630
acetic acid [(3s,8r,9s,10r,13s,14s)-10,13-dimethyl-17-(3-pyridinyl)-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] ester
A809510
154229-18-2
[(3s,8r,9s,10r,13s,14s)-10,13-dimethyl-17-pyridin-3-yl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] ethanoate
nsc749227
nsc748121
3s,9s,10r,13s,14s)-10,13-dimethyl-17-pyridin-3-yl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-ol, 3-acetate
androsta-5, 17-(3-pyridinyl)-, 3-acetate,
17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5, acetate
D09701
zytiga (tn)
abiraterone acetate (jan/usp)
dtxsid3049043 ,
cas-154229-18-2
tox21_113589
dtxcid4028969
bdbm50407398
abiraterone acetate [usp-rs]
abiraterone acetate [orange book]
abiraterone acetate [mart.]
abiraterone acetate [vandf]
abiraterone acetate [mi]
abiraterone (as acetate)
abiraterone acetate [usp monograph]
abiraterone acetate [who-dd]
androsta-5,16-dien-3-ol, 17-(3-pyridinyl)-, acetate (ester), (3.beta.)-
jnj-212082
abiraterone acetate [jan]
17-(pyridin-3-yl)androsta-5,16-dien-3beta-yl acetate
(3beta)-17-(pyridin-3-yl)androsta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate
CS-0544
AKOS015896502
S2246
SCHEMBL93715
smr004701235
MLS006010090
3b-acetoxy-17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5,16-diene
3beta-acetoxy-17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5,16-diene
UVIQSJCZCSLXRZ-UBUQANBQSA-N
abiraterone (acetate)
[(3s,8r,9s,10r,13s,14s)-10,13-dimethyl-17-pyridin-3-yl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl] acetate
W-201385
(3s,8r,9s,10r,13s,14s)-10,13-dimethyl-17-(pyridin-3-yl)-2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15-dodecahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl acetate
jnj 212082
DS-2007
(1s,2r,5s,10r,11s,15s)-2,15-dimethyl-14-(pyridin-3-yl)tetracyclo[8.7.0.0^{2,7}.0^{11,15}]heptadeca-7,13-dien-5-yl acetate
gtpl9288
AC-25760
3beta-17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5,16-dien-3-ol acetate
abiraterone acotate
EX-A107
abiraterone acetate, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
abiraterone acetate, >=98% (hplc)
abiraterone acetate; cb 7630; zytiga; (3beta)-17-(3-pyridinyl)-androsta-5,16-dien-3-ol acetate (ester); (3beta)-17-(3-pyridinyl)androsta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate
abiraterone acetate
(3?)-17-(3-pyridinyl)androsta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate
Q27888393
Z1741979782
BCP02949
BRD-K24048528-001-02-5
NCGC00379022-06
abiraterone-acetate
(3s)-3-acetoxy-17-(pyridin-3-yl)androsta-5,16-diene
(3beta)-17-(3-pyridinyl)androsta-5,16-dien-3-ol acetate
abiraterone acetate- bio-x
BA164133
br9004-1
br9004
abiraterone acetate (mart.)
abiraterone acetate (usp-rs)
abiraterone acetate (usp monograph)
(3as,3br,7s,9ar,9bs,11as)-9a,11a-dimethyl-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-3h,3ah,3bh,4h,6h,7h,8h,9h,9ah,9bh,10h,11h,11ah-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-7-yl acetate
EN300-7479171
abiraterone acetate (standard)
CS-0694903
HY-75054R

Research Excerpts

Overview

Abiraterone acetate is an antiandrogen steroidal drug that is used to treat patients with metastatic prostate cancer. It is a selective inhibitor of CYP17 α-hydroxylase, which is crucial for androgen biosynthesis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Abiraterone acetate is an antiandrogen steroidal drug that is used to treat patients with metastatic prostate cancer. "( Synthesis and characterization of epoxide impurities of abiraterone acetate.
Mirjafary, Z; Mohammad Hossein Shirazi, S; Mokhtari, J, 2022
)
2.41
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a selective inhibitor of CYP17 α-hydroxylase, which is crucial for androgen biosynthesis. "( Abiraterone Acetate, in Combination with Apigenin, Attenuates the Survival of Human Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Cells.
Atabey, US; Erdogan, S; Genc, F; Serttas, R, 2022
)
3.61
"Abiraterone Acetate (AA) is an important agent in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. "( Prostate-specific antigen response after Abiraterone treatment in mCRPC: PSA as a predictor of overall survival.
Cunha André, M; Gameiro Marques, R; Leal Carvalho, M; Mendonça Macedo, A; Silva Figueira, N, 2023
)
2.35
"Abiraterone acetate is a BCS Class IV compound associated with several oral delivery challenges."( Oral formulation strategies to improve the bioavailability and mitigate the food effect of abiraterone acetate.
Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB; Thomas, N, 2020
)
1.5
"Abiraterone acetate (AbA) is a poorly water-soluble drug with an oral bioavailability of <10% and a significant pharmaceutical food effect. "( Supersaturated-Silica Lipid Hybrids Improve in Vitro Solubilization of Abiraterone Acetate.
Joyce, P; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB; Thomas, N, 2020
)
2.23
" Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, which is an irreversible inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase/C17, 20-lyase. "( [Early- vs. late-onset treatment using abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemo-naïve, asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with metastatic CRPC after androgen deprivation therapy].
Baurecht, W; Belz, H; Bögemann, M; Feyerabend, S; Kruetzfeldt, K; Merseburger, AS; Rüssel, C; Spiegelhalder, P; Tran, N, 2020
)
1.74
"Abiraterone acetate is a potent drug used for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. "( Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Beránek, J; Boleslavská, T; Bosák, J; Dammer, O; Kozlík, P; Křížek, T; Kutinová Canová, N; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Štěpánek, F; Světlík, S; Žvátora, P, 2020
)
2.25
"Abiraterone acetate is an inhibitor of androgens biosynthesis, approved as first-line treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. "( Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury induced by the association of rosuvastatin and abiraterone: A case report and review of the literature.
Cillis, M; Gérard, L; Gillion, V; Gizzi, M; Hantson, P; Ould-Nana, I, 2021
)
2.06
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is an inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis, though this cannot fully explain its efficacy against androgen-independent prostate cancer. "( Abiraterone acetate preferentially enriches for the gut commensal Akkermansia muciniphila in castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients.
Abdur-Rashid, K; Al, KF; Anderson, A; Burton, JP; Chanyi, RM; Chin, J; Chmiel, JA; Daisley, BA; Dewar, M; Gibbons, S; Nair, SM; Reid, G; Wilcox, H, 2020
)
3.44
"Abiraterone acetate is a CYP-17 inhibitor approved for the treatment of prostate cancer. "( Low dose versus standard dose of corticosteroids in the management of adverse events of special interest from abiraterone acetate: data from a literature-based meta-analysis.
Corona, SP; Generali, D; Roviello, G, 2017
)
2.11
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is an androgen receptor axis inhibitor, indicated together with prednisone, for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. "( Long-term abiraterone withdrawal syndrome.
Campins, L; Font, A; Lianes, P; Marin, S; Miarons, M; Querol, R, 2018
)
1.92
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent inhibitor of steroidogenic enzyme 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1). "( Abiraterone Acetate for Cushing Syndrome: Study in a Canine Primary Adrenocortical Cell Culture Model.
de Wit, WL; Galac, S; Kendl, S; Kooistra, HS; Kroiss, M; Kurlbaum, M; Mol, JA; Sanders, K, 2018
)
3.37
"Abiraterone acetate is a highly variable drug and has been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in many countries. "( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of generic and branded abiraterone acetate tablet: a single-dose, open-label, and replicate designed study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
Chen, X; Gao, D; Gong, S; Hu, C; Hu, X; Li, L; Wang, C; Zhang, L; Zhao, Z, 2019
)
2.2
"Abiraterone acetate (Zytiga(®)) is an orally administered, selective inhibitor of the 17α-hydroxylase and C17,20-lyase enzymatic activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 17. "( Abiraterone acetate: a review of its use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Hoy, SM, 2013
)
3.28
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a selective oral inhibitor of Steroid-17α-Hydroxylase, for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. "( Latent hypothyreosis as a clinical biomarker for therapy response under abiraterone acetate therapy.
Bektic, J; Heidegger, I; Horninger, W; Nagele, U; Pichler, R; Pircher, A, 2014
)
2.08
"Abiraterone acetate is an oral medication that has recently been granted approval for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) prior and/or after chemotherapy with docetaxel. "( The economics of abiraterone acetate for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Dellis, A; Papatsoris, AG, 2014
)
2.18
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, a novel androgen biosynthesis inhibitor."( Adherence patterns for abiraterone acetate and concomitant prednisone use in patients with prostate cancer.
Ellis, L; Grittner, AM; Kozma, C; Lafeuille, MH; Lefebvre, P; McKenzie, RS; Slaton, T, 2014
)
1.43
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug for abiraterone, a potent CYP17A1 inhibitor used to suppress androgens in the treatment of prostate cancer."( Abiraterone acetate to lower androgens in women with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency.
Auchus, RJ; Buschur, EO; Chang, AY; Gonzalez, M; Hammer, GD; Jiao, J; Madrigal, D; Ramm, C; Smit, JW; Wang, G; Xu, XS; Yu, MK, 2014
)
2.57
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a selective inhibitor of cytochrom p450 (CYP)17 which is required for androgen biosynthesis, and can block the androgens synthesis by testicles, surrenals and intratumoral secretion. "( [Abiraterone acetate (AA): current guidelines of prescription of abiraterone].
Boissier, E; Loriot, Y; Massard, C; Vignot, S, 2014
)
2.76
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a selective irreversible inhibitor of CYP 17. "( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of abiraterone acetate for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Han, CS; Kim, IY; Patel, R, 2015
)
2.1
"Abiraterone acetate is a novel CYP17A1 inhibitor demonstrated to prolong survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). "( The development of abiraterone acetate for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Attard, G; Grist, E, 2015
)
2.19
"Abiraterone acetate is a novel irreversible inhibitor of CYP17 that was recently approved for men with post-chemotherapy or chemo-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer. "( Role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who have progressed after abiraterone acetate.
Fiaschi, AI; Francini, E; Laera, L; Petrioli, R; Ponchietti, R; Roviello, G, 2015
)
2.07
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a newly approved cytochrome-P450C17 inhibitor for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and few studies have evaluated PSA kinetics using AA so far."( Association of early PSA decline and time to PSA progression in abiraterone acetate-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; a post-hoc analysis of Japanese phase 2 trials.
Imanaka, K; Kobayashi, H; Nakayama, M; Oyama, R; Takahara, T; Yoshizawa, K, 2016
)
1.39
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a selective irreversible inhibitor of CYP 17, a key enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. "( How I do it: Prescribing abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
Dason, S; Shayegan, B; Wang, Y, 2016
)
2.18
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent inhibitor of 17alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase, a key enzyme of adrenal steroidogenesis."( Antisecretive and Antitumor Activity of Abiraterone Acetate in Human Adrenocortical Cancer: A Preclinical Study.
Berruti, A; Bonini, SA; Claps, M; Fiorentini, C; Fragni, M; Galli, D; Memo, M; Missale, C; Perego, P; Procopio, G; Sigala, S; Terzolo, M; Tiberio, GA; Tortoreto, M; Vezzoli, S; Zaffaroni, N, 2016
)
1.42
"Abiraterone acetate is a potent and irreversible inhibitor of cytochrome p450 17A1 that suppresses androgen synthesis. "( Study of cases of abiraterone discontinuation due to toxicity in pre-chemotherapy after 1 year's experience.
Balea-Filgueiras, J; Martín-Herranz, I; Ramudo-Cela, L; Vizoso-Hermida, JR, 2017
)
1.9
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor shown to prolong life in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) already treated with chemotherapy. "( TMPRSS2-ERG status in circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker of sensitivity in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate.
Anand, A; Cao, L; Danila, DC; Fleisher, M; Heller, G; Leversha, MA; Lilja, H; Molina, A; Sawyers, CL; Scher, HI; Sung, CC, 2011
)
2.01
"Abiraterone acetate is an orally active acetate salt of the steroidal compound abiraterone with antiandrogen activity."( Abiraterone acetate in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Cortesi, E; Gazzaniga, P; Iacovelli, R; Palazzo, A; Procopio, G, 2012
)
2.54
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a rationally designed CYP17 inhibitor that blocks the conversion of androgens from non-gonadal precursors effectively, thus reducing testosterone to undetectable levels."( Abiraterone acetate: redefining hormone treatment for advanced prostate cancer.
De Bono, JS; Mukherji, D; Pezaro, CJ, 2012
)
2.54
"Abiraterone acetate is a first-in-class hormonal agent that represents a new standard of care for patients with metastatic castration-recurrent prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel (category 1 recommendation)."( Prostate cancer, Version 3.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.
Armstrong, AJ; Bahnson, RR; Boston, B; Busby, JE; D'Amico, AV; Eastham, JA; Enke, CA; Farrington, T; Higano, CS; Ho, M; Horwitz, EM; Kantoff, PW; Kawachi, MH; Kuettel, M; Lee, RJ; MacVicar, GR; Malcolm, AW; Miller, D; Mohler, JL; Plimack, ER; Pow-Sang, JM; Roach, M; Rohren, E; Rosenfeld, S; Shead, DA; Srinivas, S; Strope, SA; Tward, J; Twardowski, P; Walsh, PC, 2012
)
1.1

Effects

Abiraterone acetate (AA) has been proven effective for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) It has been proposed that adaptive AA may reduce toxicity and prolong time to progression, when compared to continuous AA.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) has been proven effective for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and it has been proposed that adaptive AA may reduce toxicity and prolong time to progression, when compared to continuous AA. "( Predicting patient-specific response to adaptive therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen dynamics.
Brady-Nicholls, R; Butler, R; Enderling, H; Gatenby, RA; Wang, AZ; Zhang, J; Zhang, T, 2021
)
2.06
"Abiraterone acetate(AA)has been approved in more than 80 countries for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer(mCRPC). "( [Abiraterone acetate(ZYTIGA®)-development and literature review].
Mukai, H; Nishimura, Y; Oyama, R; Suzukawa, K, 2014
)
2.76
"Abiraterone acetate has been approved in >70 countries for chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. "( A phase 2 trial of abiraterone acetate in Japanese men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and without prior chemotherapy (JPN-201 study).
Akaza, H; Hashine, K; Imanaka, K; Matsubara, N; Nishiyama, T; Ozono, S; Satoh, T; Suzuki, H; Uemura, H, 2014
)
2.17
"Abiraterone acetate has been approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). "( Efficacy of Eplerenone in the Management of Mineralocorticoid Excess in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Without Prednisone.
Agarwal, N; Alex, A; Bailey, E; Batten, J; Boucher, K; Gaston, D; Gill, D; Gupta, S; Hahn, A; Stenehjem, D, 2017
)
1.9

Treatment

Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AA/P) prolongs survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Abirater one acetate treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated and chemotherapy-naïve patients increased the PSA decay.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Abiraterone acetate-prednisone treatment significantly decreased prostate-specific antigen progression risk by 49%, with longer median time to prostate-specific antigen progression of 5.55 months versus 2.76 months in the placebo-prednisone group (hazard ratio 0.506, P = 0.0001, primary end-point). "( Abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 bridging study.
Chen, Z; De Porre, P; Du, C; Feng, Y; Huang, Y; Jin, J; Li, C; Lin, G; Liu, W; Shan, Y; Sun, Y; Sun, Z; Xie, L; Ye, D; Ye, ZQ; Zou, Q, 2016
)
3.32
"Abiraterone acetate treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated and chemotherapy-naïve patients increased the PSA decay rate (k"( Modeling the Relationship Between Exposure to Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen Dynamics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
De Porre, P; Griffin, TW; Nandy, P; Park, YC; Poggesi, I; Ryan, CJ; Saad, F; Smith, MR; Stuyckens, K; Vermeulen, A; Xu, XS; Yu, MK, 2017
)
1.18
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide is one of the approved approaches in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the post-docetaxel setting. "( Predictors of resistance to abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in post-docetaxel setting: a single-center cohort study.
Eterović, D; Omrčen, T; Vrdoljak, E, 2020
)
1.21
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (compared with treatment with prednisone only) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer increased survival in all patients in the study regardless of pain, prostate-specific antigen levels at the start of treatment, and Gleason score at primary diagnosis."( The Phase 3 COU-AA-302 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Stratified Analysis Based on Pain, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Gleason Score.
Brookman-May, SD; Carles, J; Diels, J; Gschwend, JE; Miller, K; Van Poppel, H, 2018
)
1.12
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate without steroids is feasible, although clinically significant adverse events can occur in a minority of patients. "( A phase 2 trial of abiraterone acetate without glucocorticoids for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Choudhury, AD; Jacobus, SJ; Jones, A; Kantoff, PW; Marck, BT; McKay, RR; Morris, MJ; Mostaghel, EA; Pomerantz, MM; Slovin, SF; Sweeney, CJ; Taplin, ME; Werner, L, 2019
)
1.2
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone was well tolerated by patients who were treated for >2 yr."( Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302).
Beer, TM; Carles, J; de Bono, JS; de Souza, P; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Flaig, TW; Fradet, Y; Griffin, TW; Hainsworth, JD; Higano, CS; Kheoh, T; Logothetis, CJ; Mainwaring, P; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; North, S; Park, YC; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Saad, F; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Small, EJ; Smith, MR; Taplin, ME; Todd, MB; Van Poppel, H; Yu, EY; Yu, MK, 2014
)
0.99
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AA/P) prolongs survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. "( Common Genetic Variation in CYP17A1 and Response to Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Binder, M; Hillman, DW; Kohli, M; Kohli, R; Kohli, T; Lee, A; Zhang, BY, 2016
)
1.04
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in the phase III trial was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, which was generally similar to that of the placebo plus prednisone group."( Abiraterone acetate: in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Yang, LP, 2011
)
2.15

Toxicity

abiraterone acetate (AA) was associated with an increased risk of all-grade adverse effects (RR = 1.5)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" No grade 3-4 adverse events were observed."( Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Concomitant Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
de Braud, F; Grassi, P; Procopio, G; Salvioni, R; Testa, I; Torri, V; Valdagni, R; Verzoni, E, 2015
)
0.82
"AA appears to be safe and well tolerated even in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities or with increased risk factors for cardiovascular diseases."( Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Concomitant Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
de Braud, F; Grassi, P; Procopio, G; Salvioni, R; Testa, I; Torri, V; Valdagni, R; Verzoni, E, 2015
)
0.82
" Adverse events were summarised descriptively."( Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302).
Beer, TM; Carles, J; de Bono, JS; de Souza, P; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Flaig, TW; Fradet, Y; Griffin, TW; Hainsworth, JD; Higano, CS; Kheoh, T; Logothetis, CJ; Mainwaring, P; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; North, S; Park, YC; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Saad, F; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Small, EJ; Smith, MR; Taplin, ME; Todd, MB; Van Poppel, H; Yu, EY; Yu, MK, 2014
)
0.65
" Secondary outcomes were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and severe adverse effects (grade 3 or higher)."( Efficacy and safety of second-line agents for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cleves, A; Magri, V; Marras, E; Monti, E; Perletti, G; Rennie, PS; Trinchieri, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Large-scale studies are also necessary to evaluate the impact of relevant toxic effects observed in a limited number of patients (e."( Efficacy and safety of second-line agents for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cleves, A; Magri, V; Marras, E; Monti, E; Perletti, G; Rennie, PS; Trinchieri, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Specific adverse events with abiraterone-prednisone were similar between the age subgroups."( Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Carles, J; Griffin, TW; Kheoh, T; Li, J; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Smith, MR; Van Poppel, H, 2015
)
0.73
" We have demonstrated that abiraterone, a selective androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, is a safe and active therapeutic option in a subgroup of 47 very elderly adults (aged > 80 years) enrolled in the Italian named patient program, with a tolerability profile and clinical outcomes comparable to those of younger population."( Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Abiraterone Acetate After Docetaxel in Octogenarians With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of the Italian Compassionate Use Named Patient Programme.
Alesini, D; Basso, U; Caffo, O; Campadelli, E; Conteduca, V; D'Angelo, A; De Giorgi, U; Donini, M; Ermacora, P; Fraccon, AP; Fratino, L; Galligioni, E; Gasparro, D; Giordano, M; Lo Re, G; Maines, F; Massari, F; Messina, C; Procopio, G; Ratta, R; Verderame, F; Vicario, G; Zagonel, V, 2016
)
0.72
"Our data show that AA is active and safe in very elderly patients and leads to outcomes similar to those observed in younger patients, thus confirming that AA is a manageable therapeutic option for this patient population."( Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Abiraterone Acetate After Docetaxel in Octogenarians With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of the Italian Compassionate Use Named Patient Programme.
Alesini, D; Basso, U; Caffo, O; Campadelli, E; Conteduca, V; D'Angelo, A; De Giorgi, U; Donini, M; Ermacora, P; Fraccon, AP; Fratino, L; Galligioni, E; Gasparro, D; Giordano, M; Lo Re, G; Maines, F; Massari, F; Messina, C; Procopio, G; Ratta, R; Verderame, F; Vicario, G; Zagonel, V, 2016
)
0.72
"To investigate whether long-term use of low-dose P with or without AA leads to corticosteroid-associated adverse events (CA-AEs) in mCRPC patients."( Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Charnas, R; Chi, KN; de Bono, JS; De Porre, P; Fizazi, K; Gomella, LG; Londhe, A; McGowan, T; Miller, K; Montgomery, B; Pelhivanov, N; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Todd, MB, 2016
)
0.64
"We assessed adverse events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer during long-term treatment with a low dose of a corticosteroid."( Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Charnas, R; Chi, KN; de Bono, JS; De Porre, P; Fizazi, K; Gomella, LG; Londhe, A; McGowan, T; Miller, K; Montgomery, B; Pelhivanov, N; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Todd, MB, 2016
)
0.64
" We describe the protocol for use of abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer chemotherapy naive patients has been implanted in our centre and we review the cases of those patients whose adverse effects have forced the discontinuation of treatment."( Study of cases of abiraterone discontinuation due to toxicity in pre-chemotherapy after 1 year's experience.
Balea-Filgueiras, J; Martín-Herranz, I; Ramudo-Cela, L; Vizoso-Hermida, JR, 2017
)
0.46
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (32%), decreased appetite (25%), asthenia (18%), back pain (17%), and arthralgia (16%)."( Antitumour Activity and Safety of Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for ≥24 weeks in Europe.
Baron, B; Chowdhury, S; de Bono, JS; Elliott, T; Feyerabend, S; Fizazi, K; Grande, E; Hirmand, M; Melhem-Bertrandt, A; Werbrouck, P, 2018
)
0.68
" These adverse events are traditionally managed with a standard dose of corticosteroids."( Low dose versus standard dose of corticosteroids in the management of adverse events of special interest from abiraterone acetate: data from a literature-based meta-analysis.
Corona, SP; Generali, D; Roviello, G, 2017
)
0.67
" The risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs) was calculated for each trial along with appropriate 95% CI using fixed- or random-effects methods."( Toxicity profile characteristics of novel androgen-deprivation therapy agents in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li, J; Liang, D; Liao, R; Qiu, K; Su, C; Wu, J; Zhu, J, 2018
)
0.48
" Use of abiraterone acetate was associated with an increased risk of all-grade adverse effects (RR = 1."( Toxicity profile characteristics of novel androgen-deprivation therapy agents in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li, J; Liang, D; Liao, R; Qiu, K; Su, C; Wu, J; Zhu, J, 2018
)
0.92
"AA appears to be safe in pts with cardiovascular comorbidities or CAD risk factors."( Cardiovascular safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prospective evaluation.
Aglietta, M; Aversa, C; Bonzano, A; Galizia, D; Gernone, A; Marandino, L; Nuzzolese, I; Ortega, C; Prati, V; Ruatta, F; Torino, S, 2018
)
0.78
" Efficacy endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and safety endpoints (including treatment related deaths and selected adverse events) were assessed."( Abiraterone acetate/androgen deprivation therapy combination versus docetaxel/androgen deprivation therapy combination in advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis on safety and efficacy.
Abdel-Rahman, O; Kassem, L; Shohdy, KS, 2018
)
1.92
" Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10 (55."( Effectiveness, safety and cost of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world data analysis.
Alcolea, V; Faus, MT; Gómez, F; Koninckx, M; Marco, JL; Pérez, I, 2019
)
0.79
"Our findings provide further evidence for the survival benefits of AA with a low frequency of additional adverse events among unselected patients."( Abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Efficacy and safety in unselected patients.
Culine, S; Doucet, L; Fizazi, K; Hennequin, C; Marret, G, 2018
)
0.48
" The most frequently reported adverse events (>20% in either group) in the Japanese subgroup were hypertension, nasopharyngitis, weight increased, hypokalemia, hot flush, back pain, hyperglycemia, ALT and AST elevation."( Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed, metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of LATITUDE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study.
Enjo, K; Fizazi, K; Fukasawa, S; Kawaguchi, K; Matsubara, N; Noguchi, H; Suzuki, H; Todd, M; Tran, N, 2018
)
0.79
" The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both the AA + prednisone and prednisone-alone groups was elevated alanine aminotransferase level in 5 of 43 patients (11."( Abiraterone acetate for chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-centre prospective study of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors.
Chi, C; Dong, B; Fan, L; Gong, Y; Huang, Y; Pan, J; Sha, J; Shangguan, X; Wang, Y; Xue, W; Zhou, L, 2018
)
1.92
" Adverse events of grade ≥3 was similar in elderly group (12."( Safety and outcomes of new generation hormone-therapy in elderly chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients in the real world.
Beardo, P; Campá, J; Congregado, B; Extramiana, J; Llarena, R; Medina-López, RA; Osman, I; San José, B,
)
0.13
" Patient characteristics and adverse events were compared with those from clinical trials."( Cardiovascular and Metabolic Toxicity of Abiraterone in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-marketing Experience.
Caram, MEV; Estes, JP; Griggs, JJ; Smith, DC; Tsao, PA, 2019
)
0.51
"In a cohort of 174 patients, 28% experienced either the development or worsening of a comorbid disease; 8% required an ED visit or hospitalization owing to known adverse effects of abiraterone."( Cardiovascular and Metabolic Toxicity of Abiraterone in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-marketing Experience.
Caram, MEV; Estes, JP; Griggs, JJ; Smith, DC; Tsao, PA, 2019
)
0.51
" In case 2, the only adverse event was hypokalemia, which was treated using potassium preparations."( Safety of Abiraterone Acetate Administration in Elderly Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Two Case Reports.
Kimata, R; Kondo, Y; Tomita, Y, 2019
)
0.92
" Grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 24 (68."( Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed, metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer: final subgroup analysis of LATITUDE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Fizazi, K; Fukasawa, S; Hashine, K; Kitani, S; Matsubara, N; Mundle, S; Ohtake, N; Shibayama, K; Shin, T; Suzuki, H; Tran, N, 2020
)
0.87
" No increase in mineralocorticoid excess-related adverse events was observed."( Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study.
Abrams, C; Attard, G; Chi, KN; Chien, C; de Jonge, MJA; de Wit, R; Friedlander, TW; Hellemans, P; Jiao, JJ; Posadas, EM; Saad, F; Yu, MK, 2020
)
0.79
" Most common adverse event was nasopharyngitis (15/50 patients, 30."( Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed first-line androgen-deprivation therapy: a single-arm, phase 4 study.
Arai, G; Furukawa, J; Iinuma, M; Kamiya, N; Kikukawa, H; Kobayashi, H; Kobayashi, K; Maniwa, A; Mikami, K; Nakashima, T; Nakatsu, H; Nasu, Y; Okuno, N; Satoh, T; Tanabe, K; Uemura, H, 2021
)
0.93
" Baseline characteristics, safety (treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent severe adverse events), and efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed."( Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
Birtle, A; Bjartell, A; Chowdhury, S; Costa, L; Feyerabend, S; Gomez-Veiga, F; Kalinka, E; Kramer, G; Lefresne, F; Lukac, M; Lumen, N; Maroto, P; Matveev, V; Paiss, T; Spaëth, D; Wapenaar, R, 2021
)
0.88
" There were no unexpected adverse events in any patient subgroup."( Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
Birtle, A; Bjartell, A; Chowdhury, S; Costa, L; Feyerabend, S; Gomez-Veiga, F; Kalinka, E; Kramer, G; Lefresne, F; Lukac, M; Lumen, N; Maroto, P; Matveev, V; Paiss, T; Spaëth, D; Wapenaar, R, 2021
)
0.88
" Adverse events and adverse drug reactions were evaluated for safety."( Safety and efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study.
Fujino, A; Harada, S; Imanaka, K; Koroki, Y; Yasuda, Y, 2021
)
0.93
" Adverse events were observed in 225/492 patients (45."( Safety and efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study.
Fujino, A; Harada, S; Imanaka, K; Koroki, Y; Yasuda, Y, 2021
)
0.93
" Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 58% versus 49% of older patients receiving cabazitaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide and 48% versus 42% of younger patients."( Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.
Bamias, A; Carles, J; Castellano, D; de Bono, J; de Wit, R; Eymard, JC; Feyerabend, S; Fizazi, K; Geffriaud-Ricouard, C; Helissey, C; Iacovelli, R; Kramer, G; Melichar, B; Ozatilgan, A; Poole, EM; Sternberg, CN; Sverrisdóttir, Á; Theodore, C; Tombal, B; Wülfing, C, 2021
)
0.62
"We assessed the impact of plasma trough concentrations of abiraterone (ABI) and its metabolite Δ4-abiraterone (D4A) and related polymorphisms on adverse events (AEs) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received abiraterone acetate (AA)."( Impact of trough abiraterone level on adverse events in patients with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate.
Eto, M; Habuchi, T; Huang, M; Kagaya, H; Kashima, S; Miura, M; Nara, T; Narita, S; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Shiota, M; Takahashi, Y; Yamamoto, R, 2023
)
1.31
" Here we characterise the safety of these agents in subpopulations and assess manageability of key adverse events (AEs)."( Safety Profile of Ipatasertib Plus Abiraterone vs Placebo Plus Abiraterone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Bracarda, S; Chen, G; Chi, KN; de Bono, J; Garcia, J; Harris, A; Hinton, H; Massard, C; Matsubara, N; Olmos, D; Sandhu, S; Sane, R; Schenkel, F; Sternberg, CN; Sweeney, C, 2023
)
0.91
"This study aimed to highlight the comprehensive differences in adverse events between abiraterone and enzalutamide based on a big data data set."( Adverse Events of Abiraterone Acetate vs Enzalutamide.
Blas, L; Eto, M; Matsumoto, T; Nagakawa, S; Shiota, M; Tsukahara, S, 2023
)
1.24
"We downloaded adverse event data sets of abiraterone and enzalutamide from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database."( Adverse Events of Abiraterone Acetate vs Enzalutamide.
Blas, L; Eto, M; Matsumoto, T; Nagakawa, S; Shiota, M; Tsukahara, S, 2023
)
1.24
" Overall, the reporting odds ratio indicated a higher incidence rate of serious adverse events for abiraterone than enzalutamide."( Adverse Events of Abiraterone Acetate vs Enzalutamide.
Blas, L; Eto, M; Matsumoto, T; Nagakawa, S; Shiota, M; Tsukahara, S, 2023
)
1.24

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Despite a 16-fold reduction in dose, abiraterone exposure in patients with severe hepatic impairment was about 22% and 44% of the Cmax and AUC∞ of healthy controls, respectively."( Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies of abiraterone acetate in men with hepatic or renal impairment.
Acharya, M; Breeding, J; Chien, C; Gonzalez, M; Haqq, C; Jiao, J; Lawitz, E; Marbury, T; Molina, A; Stieltjes, H; Stonerock, R; Tran, N; Verboven, P; Yu, M, 2014
)
0.67
" In this review, an overview of the pharmacokinetic characteristics is given for both drugs and potential and proven drug-drug interactions are presented."( Pharmacokinetic Aspects of the Two Novel Oral Drugs Used for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide.
Benoist, GE; Burger, DM; Gerritsen, WR; Hendriks, RJ; Mulders, PF; Schalken, JA; Somford, DM; van Erp, NP; van Oort, IM, 2016
)
0.65
"We evaluated the impact of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole, and a strong inducer, rifampicin, on the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure of abiraterone in two studies in healthy men."( Impact on abiraterone pharmacokinetics and safety: Open-label drug-drug interaction studies with ketoconazole and rifampicin.
Acharya, M; Bernard, A; Chien, C; De Vries, R; Jiao, J; Monbaliu, J; Stieltjes, H; Tran, N; Vaccaro, N; Yu, M, 2015
)
0.42
" This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic profile between the test product (abiraterone acetate tablet) and reference product ZYTIGA® (250 mg) mainly."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of generic and branded abiraterone acetate tablet: a single-dose, open-label, and replicate designed study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
Chen, X; Gao, D; Gong, S; Hu, C; Hu, X; Li, L; Wang, C; Zhang, L; Zhao, Z, 2019
)
0.98
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at two consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart."( Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer.
Arasaratnam, M; Bhatnagar, A; Crumbaker, M; Gurney, H; McKay, MJ; Molloy, MP, 2019
)
0.76
" Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on C1D7 and C2D8."( Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study.
Abrams, C; Attard, G; Chi, KN; Chien, C; de Jonge, MJA; de Wit, R; Friedlander, TW; Hellemans, P; Jiao, JJ; Posadas, EM; Saad, F; Yu, MK, 2020
)
0.79
" No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between abiraterone and apalutamide; however, apalutamide decreased exposure to prednisone."( Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study.
Abrams, C; Attard, G; Chi, KN; Chien, C; de Jonge, MJA; de Wit, R; Friedlander, TW; Hellemans, P; Jiao, JJ; Posadas, EM; Saad, F; Yu, MK, 2020
)
0.79
"These three Phase I trials showed that N-AbA and excipient SNAC had excellent linear pharmacokinetic characteristics."( Open-Label, Phase I, Pharmacokinetic Studies in Healthy Chinese Subjects to Evaluate the Bioequivalence and Food Effect of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets.
Feng, Z; Huang, J; Huang, Y; Kuang, Y; Li, J; Liu, Y; Pei, Q; Yang, G; Yang, S; Ye, L, 2022
)
0.92

Compound-Compound Interactions

Enzalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate has a manageable safety profile, without a meaningful DDI. Study A: When given with ketoconazole, abiratorone exposure increased by 9% f.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
") in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)."( Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary.
Aziz, R; Ghosh, D; Ibrahim, A; Justice, R; Kluetz, PG; Maher, VE; Mehrotra, N; Ning, YM; Palmby, T; Pazdur, R; Pfuma, E; Sridhara, R; Tang, S; Tilley, A; Zhang, L; Zirkelbach, JF, 2013
)
1.83
"The aim of this paper was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of weekly docetaxel (D) combined with weekly epirubicin (EPI) in patients with advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously exposed to D and abiraterone acetate (AA)."( Rechallenge of docetaxel combined with epirubicin given on a weekly schedule in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer patients previously exposed to docetaxel and abiraterone acetate: a single-institution experience.
Barbanti, G; Bianco, V; Brozzetti, S; De Rubertis, G; Fiaschi, AI; Francini, E; Laera, L; Miano, ST; Petrioli, R; Roviello, G, 2015
)
0.8
"With an ageing population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) becomes increasingly important."( [Treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer : Drug interaction potentials of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide].
Lipp, HP; Miller, K, 2016
)
0.65
"Low-dose P given with or without AA is associated with low overall incidence of CA-AEs."( Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Charnas, R; Chi, KN; de Bono, JS; De Porre, P; Fizazi, K; Gomella, LG; Londhe, A; McGowan, T; Miller, K; Montgomery, B; Pelhivanov, N; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Todd, MB, 2016
)
0.64
" Study A: When given with ketoconazole, abiraterone exposure increased by 9% for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and 15% for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞ ) compared to abiraterone acetate alone."( Impact on abiraterone pharmacokinetics and safety: Open-label drug-drug interaction studies with ketoconazole and rifampicin.
Acharya, M; Bernard, A; Chien, C; De Vries, R; Jiao, J; Monbaliu, J; Stieltjes, H; Tran, N; Vaccaro, N; Yu, M, 2015
)
0.59
" As such, there is presumably a high potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that can diminish the efficacy of AA or concurrent medications, or increase the risk of DDI-related adverse events (AEs)."( High prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate.
Berry, SR; DeAngelis, C; Emmenegger, U; Giotis, A; Jamani, R; Lee, EK; Saluja, R, 2016
)
0.64
"This phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of abiraterone acetate and prednisone combined with BEZ235, a dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor, in men with progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have not received prior chemotherapy."( A Phase I Study of Abiraterone Acetate Combined with BEZ235, a Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor, in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Friedlander, T; Hsieh, AC; Kim, W; Lin, AM; Louttit, M; Ryan, CJ; Wei, XX, 2017
)
1.03
" Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur in prostate cancer patients due to inhibition by abiraterone of liver cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent enzymes CYP2C8 and 2D6, which are involved in the metabolism of approximately 25% of all drugs, and induction by enzalutamide of CYP3A4, 2C9 and 2C19, which metabolize up to 50% of medications."( The role of drug-drug interactions in prostate cancer treatment: Focus on abiraterone acetate/prednisone and enzalutamide.
Bracarda, S; Crucitta, S; Danesi, R; De Souza, P; Del Re, M; Derosa, L; Fogli, S; Massari, F; Santini, D, 2017
)
0.69
" This review will cover the current use of abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer."( Abiraterone acetate to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in combination with prednisone.
Duarte, C; Jimeno, A; Kessler, ER, 2019
)
2.22
"To assess the safety, efficacy, androgen signalling/metabolome, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of enzalutamide with abiraterone acetate in progressive bone mCRPC (bmCRPC)."( Enzalutamide in Combination with Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.
Araujo, J; Corn, P; Dmuchowski, C; Efstathiou, E; Hoang, A; Logothetis, CJ; Melhem-Bertrandt, A; Patil, S; Prokhorova, I; Titus, M; Troncoso, P; Wen, S, 2020
)
1.05
"Enzalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate has a manageable safety profile, without a meaningful DDI."( Enzalutamide in Combination with Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.
Araujo, J; Corn, P; Dmuchowski, C; Efstathiou, E; Hoang, A; Logothetis, CJ; Melhem-Bertrandt, A; Patil, S; Prokhorova, I; Titus, M; Troncoso, P; Wen, S, 2020
)
1.14
" Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone was the first approved hormone therapy demonstrating survival benefit, and represents, to date, an alternative, or a second-line treatment after taxane-based chemotherapy, in addition to androgen-deprivation therapy, in hormone sensitive, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."( Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone in the treatment of prostate cancer: safety and efficacy.
Manceau, C; Mourey, L; Ploussard, G; Pouessel, D, 2020
)
2.91
"To assess the effects of early abiraterone acetate, in combination with systemic ADT, for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer."( Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation therapy only for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Brown, SJ; Dahm, P; Gupta, S; Konety, BR; Kunath, F; Oestreich, MC; Sathianathen, NJ, 2020
)
2.29
" We evaluated bone scan lesion area (BSLA), a quantitative imaging assessment of response in patients with mCRPC receiving radium-223 alone or in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide)."( A randomized phase IIa study of quantified bone scan response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 dichloride alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or enzalutamide.
Albany, C; Dawson, NA; Higano, CS; Mehlhaff, BA; Nordquist, LT; Patel, KR; Petrylak, DP; Quinn, DI; Sartor, O; Siegel, J; Trandafir, L; Vaishampayan, UN; Wagner, VJ, 2021
)
0.81
"Technetium-99m imaging BSLA may offer objective, quantifiable assessment of isotope uptake changes, and potentially treatment response, in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases treated with radium-223 alone or in combination with abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide."( A randomized phase IIa study of quantified bone scan response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 dichloride alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or enzalutamide.
Albany, C; Dawson, NA; Higano, CS; Mehlhaff, BA; Nordquist, LT; Patel, KR; Petrylak, DP; Quinn, DI; Sartor, O; Siegel, J; Trandafir, L; Vaishampayan, UN; Wagner, VJ, 2021
)
0.81
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of abiraterone acetate with that of bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist treatment for patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)."( Abiraterone acetate versus bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist therapy for high risk metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.
Fujihara, A; Hongo, F; Ito, S; Matsugasumi, T; Ohashi, M; Okihara, K; Shiraishi, T; Ueda, T; Ukimura, O; Yamada, Y, 2021
)
2.31
"We aimed to investigate the possible role of Api in combination with the androgen receptor inhibitor AA in the treatment of androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer LNCaP cells."( Abiraterone Acetate, in Combination with Apigenin, Attenuates the Survival of Human Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Cells.
Atabey, US; Erdogan, S; Genc, F; Serttas, R, 2022
)
2.16

Bioavailability

Abiraterone acetate (AbA) is a poorly water-soluble drug with an oral bioavailability of <10% and a significant pharmaceutical food effect. Study evaluated the bioavailability and bioequivalence of a novel formulation, abirater one acetate fine particle (AAFP), versus OAA on a steady-state background of steroids.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Subsequent optimization work in pursuit of the improvement of oral bioavailability demonstrated in vivo proof-of-concept by prodrug strategy based on phosphate esters for these 17β-HSD3 inhibitors."( Discovery of potent and orally bioavailable 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 inhibitors.
Abe, J; Conception, A; Haneta, M; Harada, K; Inoue, S; Kubo, H; Nishioka, K; Okada, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Here, we describe the biological characterization of AZD3514, an orally bioavailable drug that inhibits androgen-dependent and -independent AR signaling."( AZD3514: a small molecule that modulates androgen receptor signaling and function in vitro and in vivo.
Barry, ST; Bradbury, RH; Brave, SR; Broadbent, N; Brooks, AN; Critchlow, SE; Cumberbatch, M; Dunkley, TP; Gaughan, L; Jacobs, VN; Jones, RD; Loddick, SA; Mouchet, E; Rabow, A; Robinson, DM; Robson, CN; Ross, SJ; Shaheen, FS; Stratton, NC; Thomason, AG; Trueman, D; Walker, GE; Wedge, SR; Wilson, J; Womack, C, 2013
)
0.39
"To relate the reported positive effect of food on the oral bioavailability of abiraterone to the intraluminal behavior of abiraterone acetate, an in vivo experiment was performed, in which duodenal fluids and plasma samples were collected from healthy volunteers after the administration of abiraterone acetate in fasted and postprandial conditions."( The Effect of Food on the Intraluminal Behavior of Abiraterone Acetate in Man.
Annaert, P; Augustijns, P; Geboers, S; Mols, R; Snoeys, J; Stappaerts, J; Tack, J, 2016
)
0.89
" The originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure."( Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies.
Bosch, B; Goldwater, R; Hussaini, A; Nemeth, P, 2017
)
1.07
" The AAFP 500-mg bioavailability relative to OAA 1000 mg measured by the geometric mean ratio for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration was 93."( Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies.
Bosch, B; Goldwater, R; Hussaini, A; Nemeth, P, 2017
)
0.73
" This study evaluated the bioavailability and bioequivalence of a novel formulation, abiraterone acetate fine particle (AAFP), versus OAA on a steady-state background of steroids."( Impact of an alternative steroid on the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of a novel versus the originator formulation of abiraterone acetate.
Bosch, B; Hussaini, A; Nemeth, P; Olszanski, AJ; Stein, CA, 2017
)
0.88
"Zytiga (abiraterone acetate, AA) is known to exhibit very low bioavailability and a significant positive food effect in men."( Novel formulation of abiraterone acetate might allow significant dose reduction and eliminates substantial positive food effect.
Angi, R; Church, A; Filipcsei, G; Glavinas, H; Heltovics, G; Jordán, T; Mair, S; McDermott, J; Molnár, L; Ordasi, B; Ötvös, Z; Solymosi, T; Zann, V, 2017
)
1.21
"Particle size reduction of drug crystals in the presence of surfactants (often called "top-down" production methods) is a standard approach used in the pharmaceutical industry to improve bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs."( Development of an abiraterone acetate formulation with improved oral bioavailability guided by absorption modeling based on in vitro dissolution and permeability measurements.
Angi, R; Filipcsei, G; Glavinas, H; Heltovics, G; Jordán, T; Molnár, L; Ordasi, B; Ötvös, Z; Ránky, S; Semsey, S; Solymosi, T, 2017
)
0.79
" The marketed drug product (Zytiga®) exhibits very low bioavailability in the fasted state and a substantial positive food effect."( Investigations of the mechanism behind the rapid absorption of nano-amorphous abiraterone acetate.
Angi, R; Basa-Dénes, O; Glavinas, H; Heltovics, G; Jordán, T; Ötvös, Z; Solymosi, T; Ujhelyi, A, 2019
)
0.74
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Its low solubility and high lipophilicity lead to poor oral bioavailability (<10%) and a dramatic positive food effect (5-10-fold)."( Oral formulation strategies to improve the bioavailability and mitigate the food effect of abiraterone acetate.
Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB; Thomas, N, 2020
)
0.78
"Abiraterone acetate (AbA) is a poorly water-soluble drug with an oral bioavailability of <10% and a significant pharmaceutical food effect."( Supersaturated-Silica Lipid Hybrids Improve in Vitro Solubilization of Abiraterone Acetate.
Joyce, P; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB; Thomas, N, 2020
)
2.23
"SLH and super-SLH improve in vitro solubilization of AbA, remove the food effect and demonstrate potential to improve oral bioavailability in vivo."( Supersaturated-Silica Lipid Hybrids Improve in Vitro Solubilization of Abiraterone Acetate.
Joyce, P; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB; Thomas, N, 2020
)
0.79
" In the present work, a rational approach towards design of novel abiraterone acetate formulations that would allow increased bioavailability on a fasting stomach and thus decreased food effect is presented."( Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Beránek, J; Boleslavská, T; Bosák, J; Dammer, O; Kozlík, P; Křížek, T; Kutinová Canová, N; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Štěpánek, F; Světlík, S; Žvátora, P, 2020
)
1.04
" Ongoing initiatives aimed at modulating the colonic microbiota of cancer patients may consider targeted delivery of poorly absorbed selective bacterial growth agents."( Abiraterone acetate preferentially enriches for the gut commensal Akkermansia muciniphila in castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients.
Abdur-Rashid, K; Al, KF; Anderson, A; Burton, JP; Chanyi, RM; Chin, J; Chmiel, JA; Daisley, BA; Dewar, M; Gibbons, S; Nair, SM; Reid, G; Wilcox, H, 2020
)
2
"Abiraterone acetate (ABA), the first-line drug for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), is administered at a high daily dosage of 1000 mg due to its poor solubility, and its fasted absolute oral bioavailability is estimated to be less than 10%."( Improving the dissolution behaviors and bioavailability of abiraterone acetate via multicomponent crystal forms.
Dai, W; Mei, X; Xia, M; Yang, Y; Yang, Z; Zhu, B, 2022
)
2.41
" Next, it extensively describes the options for improving the low bioavailability of the drug."( Increasing the efficacy of abiraterone - from pharmacokinetics, through therapeutic drug monitoring to overcoming food effects with innovative pharmaceutical products.
Beránek, J; Danielak, D; Krejčí, T, 2022
)
0.72

Dosage Studied

Abiraterone acetate (ABA) is the first-line drug for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) Short-term dosing with food did not alter abirater one acetate safety.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Results from 2 observational studies reported high levels of adherence to AA dosing and administration patterns consistent with prescribing information."( Adherence patterns for abiraterone acetate and concomitant prednisone use in patients with prostate cancer.
Ellis, L; Grittner, AM; Kozma, C; Lafeuille, MH; Lefebvre, P; McKenzie, RS; Slaton, T, 2014
)
0.71
" AA was generally well-tolerated, and, therefore, the recommended AA dosage regimen in Japanese CRPC patients is 1000 mg oral dose under modified fasting conditions (at least 1 h premeal or 2 h postmeal)."( Phase-1 study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Akaza, H; Fukui, I; Iizuka, K; Matsubara, N; Niwakawa, M; Uemura, H; Yamaguchi, A, 2014
)
0.74
" Based on geometric mean ratios and 90 % CIs (versus overnight fasting condition), abiraterone exposure (AUC) increased significantly with dosing 1 h premeal, 2 h postmeal, or in between two meals 4 h apart by 57 %, 595 %, and 649 %, respectively."( Pharmacokinetics of abiraterone in healthy Japanese men: dose-proportionality and effect of food timing.
Bernard, A; Chien, C; Inoue, K; Jiao, J; Shishido, A; Stieltjes, H; Vaccaro, N; Yu, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Short-term dosing with food did not alter abiraterone acetate safety."( Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Acharya, M; Bernard, A; Chi, KN; Chien, C; Gonzalez, M; Griffin, TW; Jiao, J; Kheoh, T; Kollmannsberger, C; North, S; Pankras, C; Peng, L; Spratlin, J; Stieltjes, H; Tran, NP; Yu, MK, 2015
)
0.68
" In general, DDIs are more likely to be clinically significant for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, necessitating dosage adjustments or replacement of co-administered drugs."( [Treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer : Drug interaction potentials of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide].
Lipp, HP; Miller, K, 2016
)
0.65
" Subgroup analysis according to corticosteroids dosage revealed a higher RR of adverse events associated with a dose of 5 mg, compared to 10 mg."( Low dose versus standard dose of corticosteroids in the management of adverse events of special interest from abiraterone acetate: data from a literature-based meta-analysis.
Corona, SP; Generali, D; Roviello, G, 2017
)
0.67
" ENZ was routinely started as a dose of 160 mg per day; the dosage was reduced in some patients due to side effects."( Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predicts Prognosis for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Underwent Enzalutamide.
Hasegawa, Y; Kawahara, T; Kumano, Y; Matsubara, N; Miyoshi, Y; Uemura, H; Yasui, M, 2019
)
0.51
"5), dosing in fasted state (n = 13, DTL 12."( Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer.
Arasaratnam, M; Bhatnagar, A; Crumbaker, M; Gurney, H; McKay, MJ; Molloy, MP, 2019
)
0.76
"Our cohort demonstrated high inter- and intra-patient variability in both abiraterone and D4A with fixed dosing of AA, with no effect from choice of corticosteroids, prior use of chemotherapy, or dosing in fasting state."( Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer.
Arasaratnam, M; Bhatnagar, A; Crumbaker, M; Gurney, H; McKay, MJ; Molloy, MP, 2019
)
0.76
" While considering the standard AA dosage (1000 mg) as the main analysis, we also examined the potential impact of the low-dose AA (250 mg) strategy."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of Abiraterone Acetate versus Docetaxel in the management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Hong Kong's perspective.
Chiang, CL; Choi, HCW; Lam, TC; So, TH, 2020
)
0.84
" The low-dose AA (250 mg) strategy is potentially cost-effective when it generates equivalent efficacy as the standard dosage (1000 mg)."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of Abiraterone Acetate versus Docetaxel in the management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Hong Kong's perspective.
Chiang, CL; Choi, HCW; Lam, TC; So, TH, 2020
)
0.84
" However, currently marketed product containing crystalline abiraterone acetate exhibits strong positive food effect which results in strict dosing regimen."( Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Beránek, J; Boleslavská, T; Bosák, J; Dammer, O; Kozlík, P; Křížek, T; Kutinová Canová, N; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Štěpánek, F; Světlík, S; Žvátora, P, 2020
)
1.05
"Abiraterone acetate (ABA), the first-line drug for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), is administered at a high daily dosage of 1000 mg due to its poor solubility, and its fasted absolute oral bioavailability is estimated to be less than 10%."( Improving the dissolution behaviors and bioavailability of abiraterone acetate via multicomponent crystal forms.
Dai, W; Mei, X; Xia, M; Yang, Y; Yang, Z; Zhu, B, 2022
)
2.41
" Potential associations between abiraterone concentrations and pharmacodynamic consequences in prostate cancer may demand further dosage optimization to balance therapeutic outcomes."( Unraveling Complexities in the Absorption and Disposition Kinetics of Abiraterone via Iterative PBPK Model Development and Refinement.
Chan, ECY; Cheong, EJY; Cheong, EZB; Chin, SY; Ng, ZW; Wang, Z; Yap, TJ, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (3)

RoleDescription
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
EC 1.14.99.9 (steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase) inhibitorAn EC 1.14.99.* (miscellaneous oxidoreductase acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen) inhibitor that interferes with the action of cytochrome P450 17-alpha-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase (EC 1.14.99.9).
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
sterol esterA steroid ester obtained by formal condensation of the carboxy group of any carboxylic acid with the 3-hydroxy group of a sterol.
pyridinesAny organonitrogen heterocyclic compound based on a pyridine skeleton and its substituted derivatives.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (5)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.89380.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743077; AID743079
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency33.49150.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Steroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01750.00200.98184.7300AID207138; AID53248
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)17.05000.00010.23283.2000AID1449795
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)17.05000.00000.20794.3000AID1449795
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (81)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
steroid biosynthetic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
androgen biosynthetic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid biosynthetic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
sex differentiationSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
hormone biosynthetic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
progesterone metabolic processSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
calcitriol biosynthetic process from calciolCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
MAPK cascadeAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
single fertilizationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male somatic sex determinationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Leydig cell differentiationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphorylationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell differentiationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of integrin biosynthetic processAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of integrin biosynthetic processAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of developmental growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
animal organ formationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male genitalia morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epithelial cell proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of prostate induction by androgen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
morphogenesis of an epithelial foldAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lateral sprouting involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland epithelium morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiation involved in prostate gland developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary branching involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland alveolus developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferation involved in prostate gland developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to steroid hormone stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estrogen stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to testosterone stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
seminiferous tubule developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
non-membrane-bounded organelle assemblyAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localization to plasma membraneAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (45)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
steroid 17-alpha-monooxygenase activitySteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
heme bindingSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone aldolase activitySteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
quinine 3-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 23-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D 24-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 2-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II general transcription initiation factor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
POU domain bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
molecular condensate scaffold activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (13)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
endoplasmic reticulumSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
axonSteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodySteroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (29)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1866609Antiproliferative activity against human PC-3 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-24, Volume: 65, Issue:6
Incorporating Selenium into Heterocycles and Natural Products─From Chemical Properties to Pharmacological Activities.
AID1142266Inhibition of CYP17 in gonadally-intact hamster assessed as progesterone level in serum at 50 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis (Rvb = 1.02 +/- 0.05 ng/mL)2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Highly-selective 4-(1,2,3-triazole)-based P450c17a 17,20-lyase inhibitors.
AID1866608Antiproliferative activity against human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-24, Volume: 65, Issue:6
Incorporating Selenium into Heterocycles and Natural Products─From Chemical Properties to Pharmacological Activities.
AID657636Inhibition of LH-RH agonist leuprorelin-induced testosterone steroidogenesis in Sprague-Dawley rat at 20 mg/kg, po administered 1 hr prior leuprorelin-induction measured up to 240 mins by GC/MS analysis2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Discovery of potent and orally bioavailable 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 inhibitors.
AID315674Reduction of testosterone level in Wistar rat plasma at 56.02 mg/kg, po after 4 hrs by ELISA relative to pretreatment value2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 16, Issue:4
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of methyleneimidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17). Part I: Heterocyclic modifications of the core structure.
AID207138Ability to inhibit the Steroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase enzyme by 50%.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 38, Issue:13
Novel steroidal inhibitors of human cytochrome P45017 alpha (17 alpha-hydroxylase-C17,20-lyase): potential agents for the treatment of prostatic cancer.
AID315673Reduction of testosterone level in Wistar rat plasma at 56.02 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs by ELISA relative to pretreatment value2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 16, Issue:4
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of methyleneimidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17). Part I: Heterocyclic modifications of the core structure.
AID1449795Antagonist activity at full length human androgen receptor expressed in mammalian expression system measured after 22 to 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-15, Volume: 27, Issue:10
Novel small molecule guanidine Sigma1 inhibitors for advanced prostate cancer.
AID362250Tmax in Wistar rat at 56 mg/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID315676Reduction of testosterone level in Wistar rat plasma at 56.02 mg/kg, po after 8 hrs by ELISA relative to pretreatment value2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 16, Issue:4
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of methyleneimidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17). Part I: Heterocyclic modifications of the core structure.
AID362242Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362244Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 6 hrs2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID1142265Inhibition of CYP17 in gonadally-intact hamster assessed as testosterone level in serum at 50 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis (Rvb = 1.98 +/- 0.057 ng/mL)2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Highly-selective 4-(1,2,3-triazole)-based P450c17a 17,20-lyase inhibitors.
AID362256Intrinsic clearance in Wistar rat at 56 mg/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362252Cmax in Wistar rat at 56 mg/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362246Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362254AUC (0 to infinity) in Wistar rat at 56 mg/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID315675Reduction of testosterone level in Wistar rat plasma at 56.02 mg/kg, po after 6 hrs by ELISA relative to pretreatment value2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 16, Issue:4
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of methyleneimidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17). Part I: Heterocyclic modifications of the core structure.
AID362241Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 1 hr2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362248Terminal half life in Wistar rat at 56 mg/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID53248Ability to inhibit the C17,20-lyase enzyme by 50% using 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone as substrate.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 38, Issue:13
Novel steroidal inhibitors of human cytochrome P45017 alpha (17 alpha-hydroxylase-C17,20-lyase): potential agents for the treatment of prostatic cancer.
AID315672Reduction of testosterone level in Wistar rat plasma at 56.02 mg/kg, po after 1 hr by ELISA relative to pretreatment value2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 16, Issue:4
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of methyleneimidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17). Part I: Heterocyclic modifications of the core structure.
AID362243Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 4 hrs2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID362245Reduction in plasma testosterone level in Wistar rat at 50 mg/kg, po after 8 hrs2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of methylene imidazole substituted biaryls as inhibitors of human 17alpha-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase (CYP17)--part II: Core rigidification and influence of substituents at the methylene bridge.
AID1866610Antiproliferative activity against human T47D cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-24, Volume: 65, Issue:6
Incorporating Selenium into Heterocycles and Natural Products─From Chemical Properties to Pharmacological Activities.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (673)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's3 (0.45)18.2507
2000's3 (0.45)29.6817
2010's432 (64.19)24.3611
2020's235 (34.92)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 93.92

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index93.92 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.72 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index166.50 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (93.92)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials137 (19.80%)5.53%
Reviews125 (18.06%)6.00%
Case Studies30 (4.34%)4.05%
Observational17 (2.46%)0.25%
Other383 (55.35%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (200)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Open-label, Randomized Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability (BA) and Bioequivalence (BE) of Comparative Formulations of Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate (AA) in Men With Prostate Cancer [NCT04577833]Phase 1136 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of Niraparib in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for the Treatment of Participants With Deleterious Germline or Somatic Homologous Re [NCT04497844]Phase 3696 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-23Active, not recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Phase III Study of Olaparib Plus Abiraterone Relative to Placebo Plus Abiraterone as First-line Therapy in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (PROpel Study) [NCT03732820]Phase 3796 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-31Active, not recruiting
ANZadapt: Phase II Randomised Controlled Trial of Patient-specific Adaptive Versus Continuous Abiraterone or eNZalutamide in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT05393791]Phase 2168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-10Recruiting
A Phase 1b Clinical Trial of Cabozantinib and Abiraterone With Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer (CABIOS Trial) [NCT04477512]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-19Active, not recruiting
Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Ascending Dose, Parallel Group Study to Determine the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of ATRS-2002 Administered Subcutaneously in Healthy Adult Males [NCT04879589]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study abandoned, no participants enrolled)
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre Phase Ⅲ Study to Evaluate Abiraterone Acetate Versus Placebo Combined With Prednisone in Subjects With Asymptomatic or Mild Symptoms Without Chemotherapy, Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. [NCT04056754]Phase 3268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-16Completed
An Open Label Study of Abiraterone Acetate in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Progressed After Taxane-Based Chemotherapy [NCT01217697]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer(mCRPC) Patients Who Initiated Enzalutamide vs. Abiraterone Acetate (Abiraterone) in Flatiron Electronic Health Record (EHR)Database [NCT05968599]2,800 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-07-24Active, not recruiting
Effects of Metabolic Enzymes and Transporter Gene Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Oral Abiraterone Acetate in Healthy Chinese Adults [NCT04735913]Early Phase 181 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-05Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multiple Center Extension Study to Evaluate One Year of Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With YONSA™ 500 mg (4 x 125 mg qd) With Methylprednisolone (4 mg Bid) [NCT02962284]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Randomized Phase-II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRH-therapy Versus Abiraterone Acetate Sparing LHRH-therapy in Patients With Progressive Chemotherapy-naïve Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (SPARE) [NCT02077634]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A PHASE 4, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF CONTINUED ENZALUTAMIDE TREATMENT BEYOND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH CHEMOTHERAPY-NAÏVE METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER [NCT01995513]Phase 4509 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-22Completed
A Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Enzalutamide, Abiraterone Acetate, Dutasteride and Degarelix in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Pre-prostatectomy [NCT02159690]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to loss of funding)
A Phase 3 Study of Androgen Annihilation in High-Risk Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT03009981]Phase 3504 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study Evaluating Activity of Zenocutuzumab (MCLA-128) in Patients With or Without Molecularly Defined Cancers [NCT05588609]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-17Recruiting
A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial Comparing Docetaxel or Hormone Therapy as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Asymptomatic or Oligosymptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistent Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Progressing After Abiraterone or Enzalutamid [NCT04139772]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 4 Study of Zytiga in Poor-risk mCRPC (Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer) Patients Who Was Failed the First-line CAB (Combined Androgen Blockade) Therapy [NCT02405858]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-10Completed
A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Systemic and Tumor Directed Therapy for Recurrent Oligometastatic M1 Prostate Cancer [NCT03902951]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-17Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Study of Cabozantinib (XL184) in Combination With Atezolizumab vs Second Novel Hormonal Therapy (NHT) in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04446117]Phase 3575 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, 3-Way Crossover Pivotal Study to Assess the Bioequivalence of 2 Abiraterone Acetate Coated Tablet Formulations With Respect to the Current Commercial Abiraterone Acetate Uncoated Tablet Formulation Under Fasted Condi [NCT02230046]Phase 1102 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Adaptive Abiraterone Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02415621]Early Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1-2 Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Pre-Pubescent Children With Classic 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency [NCT03548246]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This study plan has halted and was withdrawn from the IRB.)
A Multi-arm, Open-label Phase I/IIa Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Preliminary Efficacy of AZD5305 in Combination With New Hormonal Agents in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer (PETRANHA) [NCT05367440]Phase 1/Phase 2172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-02Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of Niraparib in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Subjects With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03748641]Phase 3765 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-25Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1b-2 Study of Niraparib Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT03431350]Phase 1/Phase 2136 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-02Active, not recruiting
A Drug-Drug Interaction, Safety and Efficacy Study With JNJ-56021927 (ARN-509) and Abiraterone Acetate in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02123758]Phase 157 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-09Active, not recruiting
Phase Ib, Open-label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Anti-tumor Activity of Ascending Doses of ARN-509 in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC [NCT01792687]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-05Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase 2 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Subjects With Advanced Prostate Cancer Without Radiographic Evidence of Metastatic Disease [NCT01314118]Phase 2131 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-04Active, not recruiting
Phase Ib/II Clinical Study of TQB3616 Capsules in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT05156450]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study With a Lead-in Safety Phase of Abiraterone in Combination With PDMX1001/Niclosamide in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) [NCT02807805]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Active, not recruiting
The Evaluation of First-line Treatment Efficacy of Docetaxel and Abiraterone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate and the Exploration of the Genes Related to Treatment Effect [NCT03356444]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Phase III Study of Olaparib Plus Abiraterone Relative to Placebo Plus Abiraterone as First-line Therapy in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (PROpel Study) [NCT05171816]Phase 3108 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-24Active, not recruiting
A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of Two Abiraterone Acetate Suspension Formulations Compared to the Abiraterone Acetate Tablet Formulation Under Fasted Condition in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01362764]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Apalutamide, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, Degarelix and Indomethacin in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Pre-Prostatectomy [NCT02849990]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-09Completed
Phase II Trial of Radiation With Androgen Deprivation: Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone and Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Radiation Therapy [NCT01023061]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Randomized Three-Arm Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Neoadjuvant Apalutamide Alone or in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and GnRH Agonist on Enhancing Surgical Outcome of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT02949284]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-20Recruiting
A Study in Healthy Male Subjects Designed to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Abiraterone Following Administration of Immediate Release Formulations [NCT04295161]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-25Completed
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Selenite in Combination With Abiraterone in Patients With Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing on Abiraterone [NCT04296578]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study did not start)
Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Relapsed and/or Metastatic, Castration Resistant Salivary Gland Cancers [NCT02867852]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity of Ascending Doses of AZD4635 Both as Monotherapy and in Combination in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies [NCT02740985]Phase 1313 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-17Completed
A Phase 1b Study of EPI-7386 in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Apalutamide in mCRPC (ARES: Androgen Receptor Eradication Study) [NCT05295927]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-23Terminated(stopped due to Administrative Decision)
Advanced ChemoHormonal Therapy for Treatment Naïve Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Apalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone and Androgen Deprivation Therapy After Treatment With Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT04267887]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-11Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Double-blind Study of JNJ-56021927 in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Subjects With Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cance [NCT02257736]Phase 3982 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Study of Finite Androgen Ablation vs. Finite Androgen Ablation in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have PSA Progression After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT01786265]Phase 2310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-05Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Sequencing Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02125357]Phase 2202 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) or Fluciclovine (FACBC) PET/CT Site-Directed Therapy of OLigometASTatic Prostate Cancer (P-Flu-BLAST-PC): A Multicenter Study [NCT04175431]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Recruiting
ACTION: Phase I/II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate in Combination With Tildrakizumab (Anti-IL23 Targeting Monoclonal Antibody) in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT04458311]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Phase Ib/III Clinical Study of Dalpiciclib Isethionate Tablets Combined With Abiraterone Acetate Tablets (I) and Prednisone Tablets (AA-P) Versus Placebo Combined With AA-P in Treatment of High-volume, Metastatic, H [NCT06099990]Phase 1660 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
An Open-label Phase 2 Multi-center Study of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone and Biomarkers of Androgen Response and Resistance During Rising PSA: BARRIER-P Trial [NCT02429193]Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Maximal Androgen Depletion Followed by Randomization of Maximal Androgen Ablation With Molecular Targeted Therapies [NCT01254864]Phase 2190 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-16Completed
Long-term Effects of Enhanced Systemic Therapy and Tumor-directed Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Confirmed by Conventional Imaging Modality: a Prospective, Single-arm Study. [NCT05212857]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Recruiting
An Observational Study of Continuous Oral Dosing of an Irreversible CYP17 Inhibitor, Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630), in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Evaluating Androgens and Steroid Metabolites in Bone Marrow Plasma [NCT00544440]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Cancer Research UK Phase I/II Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Endocrine Effects and Anti-tumour Activity of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) in Patients With Oestrogen (ER) or Androgen Receptor (AR) Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Carcinoma [NCT00755885]Phase 1/Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
An Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone Drug-Drug Interaction Study With Dextromethorphan and Theophylline in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01017939]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT00887198]Phase 31,088 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-28Completed
Anti-Androgens and Cabazitaxel in Defining Complete Response in Prostatectomy (ACDC-RP Trial): A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-centre Phase-2 Study Evaluating the Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With [NCT02543255]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
A QT/QTc and Multi-dose PK Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration- Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT00910754]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Abemaciclib in Combination With Other Anti-Cancer Therapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT04071262]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-20Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Four-sequence, Four-period, Crossover, Single Dosing, Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of SOL-804 and Zytiga in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT06014853]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-07Recruiting
A Phase III Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Capivasertib+Abiraterone Versus Placebo+Abiraterone as Treatment for Patients With DeNovo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Characterised by PTE [NCT04493853]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-13Recruiting
An Open-label Extension (OLE), Expanded Access Study, to Assess Long-term Safety of SoluMatrix™ Abiraterone Acetate 500mg (4 x 125 mg qd) With Methylprednisolone (4mg Bid) in Patients Who Completed Study Number CHL-AA-201 [NCT02887976]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
An Open Label Biomarker Driven Phase II Clinical Trial of Abiraterone Acetate (AA) Re-Challenge in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Prior Response to AA [NCT02656615]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Patient accrual)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label Study of MK-5684 Versus Alternative Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Participants With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Previously Treated With Next-generation Hormonal Agent (NHA) and Taxane-b [NCT06136624]Phase 31,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-22Not yet recruiting
A Study of HSP90 Inhibitor AT13387 Alone or in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) no Longer Responding to Abiraterone [NCT01685268]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
ACADEMIC: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial of ADT Combined With Abiraterone or Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT03827473]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-08Terminated(stopped due to The trial was closed because the changing standard of care landscape, making this trial not impactful anymore.)
Prospective Study of Apalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate iN ChemoTHerapy-Naïve mEn With mCRPC Stratified by Race [NCT03098836]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-10Active, not recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Food-effect Study of Abiraterone Acetate (A.A) in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT02730975]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-12Completed
An Open-Label Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Assess the Effect of Abiraterone (JNJ-589485) on the Pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone Following Administration of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) and Pioglitazone HCl Tablets in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01873001]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Investigator-Initiated, Pilot Translational Study of Circulating Tumor Cells to Identify Predictive Factors of Response to Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01961843]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Active, not recruiting
Open-Label Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01834209]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Phase II Clinical Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Without Exogenous Glucocorticoids in Men With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Correlative Assessment of Hormone Intermediates. [NCT02025010]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-27Active, not recruiting
Abiraterone Acetate Treatment for Prostate Cancer Patients With a PSA of More Than Four Following Initial Androgen Deprivation Therapy Phase II [NCT01309672]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Open Label Study of CB7630 (Abiraterone Acetate) and Prednisone in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Androgen Deprivation and Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy [NCT00485303]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Canadian Observational Study in Metastatic Cancer of the Prostate: A Study of ZYTIGA Use in the Community Urology Setting. The COSMiC Prospective Prostate Cancer Registry [NCT02364531]194 participants (Actual)Observational2014-09-30Completed
A Phase I, Open-label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Preliminary Anti-tumour Activity of AZD8186 in Patients With Advanced Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), Squamous Non-Small Cell [NCT01884285]Phase 1147 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-09Completed
A Phase I/II Open Label Study of the 17α-Hydroxylase/ C17,20 Lyase Inhibitor, Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Hormone Therapy [NCT00473512]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
An Open-Label, Phase I, Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study of Dietary Effects on Abiraterone Acetate Drug Levels in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (DEAL) [NCT01913015]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to After enrollment of the first 3 subjects, an interim assessment was conducted. Comparing DBS sampling to plasma PK levels yielded unconvincing results.)
An Evolutionary Double Bind Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Abiraterone Acetate, Leuprolide Acetate, and Belzutifan in Men With Regional Prostate Cancer Eligible for Prostatectomy [NCT05574712]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, 2-cohort, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study of AZD5305 in Combination With Physician's Choice New Hormonal Agents in Patients With HRRm and Non-HRRm Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (EvoPAR-Prostate01) [NCT06120491]Phase 31,800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-21Recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Cabozantinib (XL184) in Combination With Abiraterone in Chemotherapy Naïve Subjects With Bone-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01995058]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped after results of cabozantinib Phase 3 CRPC study XL184-307.)
A Phase 1 Single Dose Open-Label Pharmacokinetic Study of Abiraterone Acetate in Male Participants With Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment Compared to Matched Control Participants With Normal Hepatic Function [NCT02001571]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Talazoparib With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Abiraterone in Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT04734730]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-04Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Apalutamide Plus Abiraterone Acetate, Docetaxel, and Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT02913196]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study of MK-5684 Versus Alternative Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Participants With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) That Progressed On or After Prior Treatment With One Next-generation Hor [NCT06136650]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-18Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRHa Versus LHRHa Alone [NCT01088529]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase II Open Label Study of CB7630 (Abiraterone Acetate) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Androgen Deprivation and Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy [NCT00474383]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, 4-Way Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of 3 New Abiraterone Acetate Tablet Formulations With Respect to the Current Commercial Abiraterone Acetate Tablet Under Fasted Conditions in Healthy Male [NCT01640093]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Response to Abiraterone/Prednisone by Race/Ethnicity, PSA Decline and Genetic Variation in Proteins Involved in Androgen Metabolism in Metastatic Hormone Naive Prostate Cancer [NCT03833921]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-23Recruiting
A Dynamic Allocation Modular Sequential Trial of Approved and Promising Therapies in Men With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02703623]Phase 2196 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy [NCT00638690]Phase 31,195 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase 1 PK and Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of DST-2970 in Patients With Prostate Cancer With Rising PSA on Treatment With Abiraterone Acetate [NCT04291664]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-31Active, not recruiting
ProBio: An Outcome-adaptive and Randomized Multi-arm Biomarker Driven Study in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03903835]Phase 3750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-01Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of Enzalutamide+Leuprolide Versus Enzalutamide+Leuprolide+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HIgh-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy [NCT02268175]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Parallel, Phase 1b/2a Study of PLX2853 in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone and Phase 1b/2a Study of PLX2853 in Combination With Olaparib in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT04556617]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-21Terminated(stopped due to study terminated due to business realignment)
Phase Ib/II Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Combination Therapies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) (KEYNOTE-365) [NCT02861573]Phase 1/Phase 21,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-17Recruiting
Phase Ib/II Clinical Study of TQB3823 Tablets Combined With Abiraterone Acetate Tablets and Prednisone Acetate Tablets in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT05405439]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-25Terminated(stopped due to The sponsor voluntarily terminated the study)
Pharmacogenetic Study in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Abiraterone Acetate [NCT01858441]148 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University [NCT04356430]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Pharmacokinetics Study to Assess the Oral Administration of CB7630 (Abiraterone Acetate) Capsule Formulation and Tablet Formulation in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT00600535]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Intra-individual Dose Escalation of Abiraterone Acetate According to Its Plasma Concentration in Patients With Progressive Castration-resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03458247]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-22Completed
A Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Niraparib Plus Androgen Receptor-Targeted Therapy (Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone) in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02924766]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-03Completed
A Phase 2 Randomized Study of YONSA® (Abiraterone Acetate), Enzalutamide or Apalutamide as First Line Therapy in Veterans With Castrate-sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT05422911]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Single-Dose, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone in Chinese Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01678573]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Hormonal Therapy Combined With Central Memory T Cells (Tcm) for Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03587285]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Study of Apalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate in Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Evaluating a Predetermined Biomarker Signature [NCT03360721]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-06Active, not recruiting
Explore the Relationship Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Abiraterone Response and Toxicity in Patients With Prostate Cancer. [NCT03348670]Phase 2/Phase 3600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-18Active, not recruiting
An Exploratory Randomized Phase II Multicenter Trial of Abiraterone Acetate With or Without Cabazitaxel in Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02218606]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Phase 2 Course Determining Study for Men With Hormone-Naïve Metastatic Prostate Cancer (HNMPCa) [NCT03821792]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Open-label Extension Study for Subjects With Prostate Cancer Who Previously Participated in an Enzalutamide Clinical Study [NCT02960022]Phase 2900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-22Recruiting
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal [NCT02987543]Phase 3387 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-06Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Low-Dose Prednisone Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Versus ADT Alone in Newly Diagnosed Subjects With High-Risk, Metastatic Hormone-naive Prostate Cancer (mHNPC) [NCT01715285]Phase 31,209 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-12Completed
Genomic Biomarker-Selected Umbrella Neoadjuvant Study for High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT04812366]Phase 2315 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-21Recruiting
Phase I/II Open Label Dose Escalation Study of the 17α-Hydroxylase/ C17,20-Lyase Inhibitor, Abiraterone Acetate in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00473746]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Combined With Dutasteride With Correlative Assessment of Tumor Androgen Levels and Androgen Receptor Sequence and Signaling at Baseline and at Progression [NCT01393730]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Randomized, Open-Label Study of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) Plus Prednisone With or Without Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With ER+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Letrozole or Anastrozole Therapy [NCT01381874]Phase 2297 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-24Completed
Durvalumab and Standard Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Lymph Node Positive Bladder Cancer [NCT05137262]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-13Recruiting
Phase II Study of Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Combination With Cabazitaxel, Compared to Cabazitaxel Alone, in Patients With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer. [NCT01845792]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Serum Testosterone Levels in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The STAAR STUDY [NCT02737332]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-21Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dasatinib Plus Abiraterone Compared to Abiraterone Alone for Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Prior to Chemotherapy [NCT01685125]Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Anti-Tumor Activity of Oral EPI-7386 in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04421222]Phase 199 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-23Recruiting
An Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Finding Study of Abiraterone Acetate in Adult Women With 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency [NCT01495910]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
An Open-Label Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Assess the Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone (JNJ-589485) Following Administration of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) Tablets in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01655147]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
An Expanded Access Open Label Study of CB7630 (Abiraterone Acetate) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Have Completed CB7630 Clinical Study COU-AA-001 [NCT01664728]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Post-marketing Surveillance Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of Abiraterone Acetate Among Adult Filipino Male Patients With Metastatic Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT01692483]0 participants (Actual)Observational2013-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor determined study is not required according to PFDA Circular 2013-004)
Phase II Single-arm Study Evaluating Neo-adjuvant (Pre-radical Radiotherapy) Abiraterone Acetate (Plus Prednisolone) and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist in High Risk Localised Prostate Carcinoma [NCT02160353]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-09Completed
A Phase 1 Single Dose Open-Label Reduced/Staged Pharmacokinetic Study of Abiraterone Acetate in Male Subjects With Impaired Renal Function Compared to Matched Control Subjects With Normal Renal Function [NCT01715259]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Erdafitinib Plus Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Double Negative Prostate Cancer [NCT03999515]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-27Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow accrual)
Pre-operative Assessment of the Anti-Proliferative Effects and Genomic Alterations of 2 Weeks of Abiraterone Acetate Compared to 2 Weeks of an Aromatase Inhibitor in Post-menopausal Hormone Receptor Positive Operable Breast Cancer [NCT01814865]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding was not acquired)
A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Activity of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Patients With a Molecular Apocrine HER2-negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT01842321]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study in Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Who Have PRIMary Resistance to Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide Treatment Comparing the Anti-tumor Effect of CABa [NCT02379390]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-17Terminated(stopped due to Unsatisfactory patient accrual)
A Multicenter Phase I/II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate + BEZ235 in Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01717898]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Dose limiting toxicities on lowest dose level)
A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating the Food Effect on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01543776]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Phase 3b Multicenter, Open-label Abiraterone Acetate Long-term Safety Study [NCT01517802]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-28Completed
A Phase II Open-label, Parallel Group Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in African American and Caucasian Men With Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01940276]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Pre-Approval Access Single Patient Request for Niraparib / Abiraterone Acetate Combination (Nira/AA Combination) [NCT05401214]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
An Open-label Phase I/IIa Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCS1477 as Monotherapy and in Combination, in Patients With Advanced Solid/Metastatic Tumours. [NCT03568656]Phase 1/Phase 2350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-23Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study - Conventional Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone and Apalutamide Following a Detectable PSA After Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT03777982]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-20Active, not recruiting
A Single-center, Single-arm, Prospective Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Combined With Abiraterone and Prednisone in mHSPC Patients With HRR Gene Mutation [NCT05167175]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
Abiraterone With Discontinuation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues in Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03565835]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate, Radiotherapy and Short-Term Androgen Deprivation in Men With Unfavorable Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT01717053]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-17Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, 3-arm Study of Abiraterone Acetate Alone, Abiraterone Acetate Plus Degarelix, a GnRH Antagonist, and Degarelix Alone for Patients With Prostate Cancer With a Rising PSA or a Rising PSA and Nodal Disease Following Definitive Radical [NCT01751451]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-18Completed
The Pacific Clinical Trial: A Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating OGX-427 in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC)Who Have Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression While Receiving Abiraterone: Hoosier Oncology Group GU12- [NCT01681433]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of accrual)
Cognitive Effects of Androgen Receptor (AR) Directed Therapies for Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03016741]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01591122]Phase 3313 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-27Completed
A Phase II Study of Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) and Prior Therapy With Ketoconazole [NCT01199146]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-10Completed
A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone With or Without Abemaciclib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT03706365]Phase 2/Phase 3350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-26Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Open-label Phase IIa Study Evaluating Quantified Bone Scan Response Following Treatment With Radium-223 Dichloride Alone or in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Subjects With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have [NCT02034552]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-07Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study of Cabazitaxel Versus an Androgen Receptor (AR)-Targeted Agent (Abiraterone or Enzalutamide) in mCRPC Patients Previously Treated With Docetaxel and Who Rapidly Failed a Prior AR-targeted Agent (CARD) [NCT02485691]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-09Completed
Phase 3 Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of TAVT-45 (Abiraterone Acetate) Granules for Oral Suspension (Novel Abiraterone Acetate Formulation) Relative to a Reference Abiraterone Acetate Formulation in Patients With mCSPC & mCRPC [NCT04887506]Phase 3107 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-14Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Progression on Abiraterone [NCT01848067]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-14Completed
A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Who Initiated Enzalutamide vs. Abiraterone Acetate (Abiraterone) in the 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) Data (2009-2020 [NCT05520138]5,506 participants (Actual)Observational2022-08-29Completed
Multi-arm Multi-modality Therapy for Very High Risk Localized and Low Volume Metastatic Prostatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT03436654]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-21Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Definitive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy [NCT03043807]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-22Completed
A Single-center, Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Abiraterone Acetate in the Treatment of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate [NCT04736108]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-31Not yet recruiting
Radiation Enhancement of Local and Systemic Anti-Prostate Cancer Immune Responses [NCT03649841]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-29Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to low accrual.)
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Trial of Sipuleucel-T With Concurrent Versus Sequential Administration of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT01487863]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Open Label Pharmacodynamic Study of Abiraterone Acetate in the Treatment of Metastatic, Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01503229]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Bioequivalence of Abiraterone Acetate in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: an Open, Randomized, Single-dose, Three-cycle, Three-sequence Crossover Study [NCT04863105]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-24Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Parallel Controlled Study Comparing the Serum Testosterone Levels in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Oral Administration of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets (I) or ZYTIGA® [NCT04862091]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-23Completed
Optimizing Abiraterone (Zytiga®) Therapy by Exploring the Relation Between an Early Biomarker - Drug Exposure - as a Predictor for Drug Response in Patients With mCRPC [NCT02426333]56 participants (Actual)Observational2016-01-31Completed
PEAX: Men With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Either Sipuleucel-T (Provenge®), Abiraterone Acetate (Zytiga®) or Enzalutamide (Xtandi®) Undergoing Cardiopulmonary EXercise Testing [NCT02353715]38 participants (Actual)Observational2015-07-07Completed
A Randomized Gene Fusion Stratified Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone With or Without ABT-888 for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01576172]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Dovitinib (TKI258) Combined With Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Evaluating Markers of FGF and AR Signaling in Bone Marrow and Plasma [NCT01994590]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-19Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor stopped supplying study drug)
TRITON3: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Phase 3 Study of Rucaparib Versus Physician's Choice of Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Associated With Homologous Recombination Deficiency [NCT02975934]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-13Active, not recruiting
Cabazitaxel With Abiraterone Versus Abiraterone Alone Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease Following Docetaxel: The CHAARTED2 Trial [NCT03419234]Phase 2223 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-26Active, not recruiting
Activity of Abiraterone Acetate in the Management of Cushing's Syndrome in Patients With Adrenocortical Carcinoma [NCT03145285]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy [NCT01695135]Phase 3214 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-09Completed
A Pre-Operative Study to Assess the Effects of Apalutamide Plus LHRH Agonist or Apalutamide Plus Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRH Agonist for Six Months for Prostate Cancer Patients at High Risk for Recurrence [NCT03279250]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-13Completed
Phase 2 Trial Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab in Combination With Intratumoral SD-101 Therapy in Patients With Hormone-Naïve Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Receiving Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT03007732]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-17Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study Of Neoadjuvant And Adjuvant Abiraterone Acetate + Apalutamide For Intermediate-High Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy [NCT02903368]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-19Active, not recruiting
BRCAAway: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Abiraterone, Olaparib, or Abiraterone + Olaparib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With DNA Repair Defects [NCT03012321]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-12Active, not recruiting
A Pre-Operative Study to Assess the Effects of Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRH Agonist and Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRH Agonist and Enzalutamide for Six Months for Prostate Cancer Patients at High-Risk for Recurrence [NCT01946165]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A Phase 2 Open Label Study of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) and Prednisolone in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Androgen Deprivation and Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy. [NCT01685983]Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-30Completed
A Prospective, Multi-arm, Multi-center Clinical Trial on Neoadjuvant Intense Endocrine Therapy for High Risk and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT05406999]Phase 2900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label, Single Dose, Full Replicated Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety Between BR9004 and BR9004-1 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT04889651]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-15Completed
Fluzoparib and Abiraterone in the preSurgery Treatment of Prostate Cancer: FAST Trial [NCT05223582]Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Study Evaluating Abiraterone Acetate With Different Steroid Regimens for Preventing Symptoms Associated With Mineralocorticoid Excess in Asymptomatic, Chemotherapy-naïve and Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Pati [NCT01867710]Phase 2164 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-16Completed
A Phase 1, Single Dose, Open-Label, Three-Period, Crossover Study to Determine the Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone Acetate in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01798628]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Clinical Trial of a Rapidly Cycling, Non-Cross Reactive Regimen of Approved Therapeutic Agents to Treat Prostate Cancer [NCT02903160]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-13Completed
A Multi-Center Trial of Androgen Suppression With Abiraterone aCetate, LEuprolide, PARP Inhibition and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ASCLEPIuS): A Phase I/2 Trial in High Risk and Node Positive Prostate Cancer [NCT04194554]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-06Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Post-marketing Surveillance to Assess Safety of Zytiga (Abiraterone Acetate Tablets 250 mg) in Indian Patients With Metastatic, Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer as Per Locally Approved Prescribing Information [NCT02608359]0 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No subjects recruited in the study)
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prostatectomy for Castration-Naive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT04992026]Phase 2128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Active, not recruiting
A 2 Arm, Phase II Controlled Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone and Abiraterone Associated With of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Oligometastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (ARTO Trial) [NCT03449719]174 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Not yet recruiting
Phase 2 Study of CJNJ-67652000 (Niraparib/Abiraterone Acetate Fixed-Dose Combination) and Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Associated With SPOP Mutation With or Without Homologous Recombination Deficiency [NCT05689021]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-07Recruiting
Precision Neoadjuvant Therapy for High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer With PTEN Loss [NCT05593497]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-01Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial of Primary Radiotherapy With Androgen Ablation With or Without Adjuvant Niraparib for Selected High-Risk Locoregional Prostate Cancer [NCT04947254]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-05Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized Open-label Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Participants With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Are Unselected for Homologous Recombination Repair [NCT03834519]Phase 3793 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Pre-Pubescent Children With Classic 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency [NCT02574910]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-01Recruiting
A Prospective Randomised Phase III Study Of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Or Without Docetaxel With Or Without Local Radiotherapy With Or Without Abiraterone Acetate And Prednisone In Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer [NCT01957436]Phase 31,173 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study to Determine Sequential Response to Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT) Followed by Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Post-BAT in Men With Prostate Cancer Progressing on Combined Androgen Ablative Therapies [NCT02090114]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-25Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Fuzuloparib Combined With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone (AA-P) Versus Placebo Combined With AA-P as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant P [NCT04691804]Phase 3804 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-18Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Chinese Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have [NCT05457257]Phase 442 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-29Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Abiraterone Acetate in African American/Black Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01735396]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
Open Label Phase Two Trial of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride With Concurrent Administration of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Symptomatic Castration-Resistant (Hormone-Refractory) Prostate Cancer Subjects With Bone Metastasis [NCT02097303]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study Determining Safety and Tolerability of Enzalutamide (Formerly MDV3100) in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT01650194]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-09Completed
An Open, Multi-center, Phase Ⅱ Clinical Study of Fluzoparib Combined With Apatinib or Fluzoparib in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04869488]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Increased-Dose Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) [NCT01637402]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-13Completed
Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, Chemo-Naive, Who Received a Prior Diethylstilbestrol Therapy [NCT02217566]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-23Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Cabazitaxel Combined With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Whose Disease Has Progressed After Docetaxel Chemotherapy [NCT01511536]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Serum Blood Levels of Testosterone Precursors
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of Abiraterone
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Serum Blood Levels of Testosterone
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Tumor Response
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Abiraterone
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Abiraterone
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at Week 12
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Abiraterone
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00473512 (11) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Abiraterone
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Total Body Clearance (Cl_F_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Decline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Participants With Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz_F_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Radiographic Objective Response Rate (RAD-ORR)
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Terminal Half-life (HL_Lambda_z) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma-Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma-Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinite Time (AUCINF_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Time to PSA Progression
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Radiographic Progression Free Survival (RAD-PFS)
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: PSA Progression Free Survival (PSA-PFS)
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of PSA Response
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Objective Response
NCT00473746 (17) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Time
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at Week 12
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Duration of PSA Response
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Shift From Baseline in Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score at Post-dose (Week 148)
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Objective Tumor Response as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00474383 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen Based Progression-free Survival (PSA-PFS)
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Time to Radiographic Progression
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Radiographic Response
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Shift From Baseline in Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00485303 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00544440 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Detectable Bone Marrow Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Level (>9 Picograms/Mililiter)
NCT00544440 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Detectable Bone Marrow Testosterone Level (>1 Picograms/Mililiter)
NCT00638690 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving a Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline >=50%
NCT00638690 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00638690 (4) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression According to Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group Criteria
NCT00638690 (4) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-free Survival
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Time to Opiate Use for Prostate Cancer Pain
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by >=1 Point
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
NCT00887198 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)
NCT01199146 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Decline of > 50%
NCT01199146 (3) [back to overview]Time To Progression (TTP)
NCT01199146 (3) [back to overview]Preliminary Evidence of Efficacy of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT01309672 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With PSA Partial Response
NCT01309672 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Undetectable PSA
NCT01309672 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01309672 (5) [back to overview]Objective Progression-free Survival
NCT01309672 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Toxicity of Abiraterone Acetate
NCT01314118 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) During the Core Study
NCT01314118 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels After 3 Cycles of Treatment
NCT01314118 (4) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT01314118 (4) [back to overview]Time to Radiographic Evidence of Disease Progression (TTRP)
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Estradiol and Estrone) at End of Treatment
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) at End of Treatment
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum Androgen Levels
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Presence of AR Amplification
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum Levels of Testosterone
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Androgen Receptor (AR) Related Mutations
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Response
NCT01487863 (1) [back to overview]Cumulative CD54 Upregulation Ratio Between the Cohorts.
NCT01503229 (1) [back to overview]Change in Tissue Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Objective Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cabazitaxel in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: PSA Progression Free Survival
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Concentration Observed Just Before Treatment Administration During Repeated Dosing at Steady State (Ctrough ss)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : First Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Cmax)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Cmax)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Terminal Half-life (t 1/2z)
NCT01511536 (15) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Total Plasma Clearance (CL)
NCT01517802 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01543776 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01543776 (5) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration of Abiraterone
NCT01543776 (5) [back to overview]Adrenal Androgen Production (DHEA-S)
NCT01543776 (5) [back to overview]Change in PSA Level
NCT01543776 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01576172 (5) [back to overview]Rates of PSA Decline
NCT01576172 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01576172 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rates in Patients With Measurable Disease.
NCT01576172 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate
NCT01576172 (5) [back to overview]Grade 4 or 5 Adverse Events
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Circulating Androstenedione Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression for Dose Escalation Cohort
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst-grade, Treatment-related Toxicities for Dose Escalation Group
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Circulating DHEA Levels Between Primary-Resistant and Responders
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Serum Concentration Levels of Abiraterone Acetate Over Time
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With PSA Response From Dose Escalation
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Correlation of Circulating Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Levels From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Circulating Testosterone Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders
NCT01637402 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Circulating DHEA-S Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Androstenedione Concentration in Blood
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Bone Scan Response at EoT
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cortisol in Bone Marrow Aspirate
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone Concentration in Blood
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone in Bone Marrow Aspirate
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Androstenedione in Bone Marrow Aspirate
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Progesterone Concentration in Blood
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Progesterone in Bone Marrow Aspirate
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EoT) in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Blood
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cortisol Concentration in Blood
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Bone Marrow Aspirate
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urine N-Telopeptide
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to EoT in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response for Soft Tissue Lesions According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST)
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01650194 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01681433 (5) [back to overview]Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts
NCT01681433 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response
NCT01681433 (5) [back to overview]PSA Response
NCT01681433 (5) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT01681433 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Radiographic Response
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01685983 (7) [back to overview]Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S)
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Overall Survival
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSA Response
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Pain Palliation
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Time to Pain Progression
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression (PSA)
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Score at End of Treatment
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire: Total Scores at the End of Treatment
NCT01695135 (8) [back to overview]DB Phase: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of Chemotherapy
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Time to Skeletal-Related Event
NCT01715285 (7) [back to overview]Time to Subsequent Therapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Metastasis or Systemic Therapy
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Undetectable PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) at 1 Year
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]PSA Nadir Value
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]PSA < 1.5ng/ml in Setting of Non-castrate Testosterone
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Progression-free Survival (BPFS)
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Time to PSA Nadir
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery
NCT01717053 (8) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability
NCT01717898 (3) [back to overview]Number of Reported Dose Limiting Toxicities When Combining BEZ235 With Abiraterone Acetate (Phase I).
NCT01717898 (3) [back to overview]Anti-tumor Responses as Defined by a Decline in PSA of > 50%
NCT01717898 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose for BEZ235 + Abiraterone Acetate (Phase I).
NCT01735396 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ≥ 30% Change in PSA
NCT01735396 (3) [back to overview]Response Assessment
NCT01735396 (3) [back to overview]Safety of Abiraterone
NCT01751451 (1) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01845792 (2) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT01845792 (2) [back to overview]PSA Response
NCT01848067 (2) [back to overview]Phase I: Frequency of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Alisertib, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.1
NCT01848067 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a PSA Value Equal to or Greater Than 25%
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Worst Pain
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Time to Opiate Use for Cancer-related Pain
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire Score
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Interference Subscale
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Intensity Subscale
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): EQ-VAS
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Index Score
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Neither of the 2 Mineralocorticoid Excess Toxicity During the First 24 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate [Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Decline From Baseline] at Week 12
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by 1 Point
NCT01867710 (15) [back to overview]Time to Next Prostate Cancer Therapy
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Percent of Subjects Experiencing Hypertension
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Number of Men With PSA Decline to < 0.1 and < 0.2 ng/ml
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Change in PSA Response
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Median Time to PSA Progression
NCT01940276 (6) [back to overview]Median Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01946165 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins
NCT01946165 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Pathologic Stage Less Than or Equal to ypT2N0
NCT01994590 (1) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Functional Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Functional Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Emotional Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Emotional Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Use of New Antineoplastic Therapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Time to Degradation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Rate of Pain Progression
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Death
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Social/Family Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Social/Family Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Prostate Cancer Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Prostate Cancer Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Physical Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT01995513 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Physical Well-Being Domain Scores
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Toxicities That Required the Addition of Prednisone to Manage Symptoms of Persistent or Severe Mineralocorticoid Excess
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Percent Changes in Serum Concentrations of Androgen (Including Testosterone, DHT and Androgen Precursors) Between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Serum Concentrations of Corticosteroid Intermediates Between the First and Second Assessment Visits.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Changes in BMI Between Cycle 1 and Next Cycle
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Hemoglobin-A1c Between Cycle 1 and Next Cycle (Cycle 4)
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Serum Concentrations of ACTH Between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring the Addition of Prednisone to Manage Symptoms of Severe Fatigue.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Progressed With Measurable Disease at Pre-study Among Those Who Were Added of Prednisone to AA at Time of PSA Progression on AA Monotherapy.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Received AA Monotherapy and Progressed With Measurable Disease at Pre-study
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]PSA Response and Its Duration to AA Monotherapy.
NCT02025010 (11) [back to overview]PSA Response and Its Duration to Addition of Prednisone to AA at Time of PSA Progression on AA Monotherapy.
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal Event
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Time to Radiological Bone Progression
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Time to Radiological Progression
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Patient Bone Scan Response Rate
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Radiological Progression Free Survival
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02034552 (8) [back to overview]Bone Scan Lesion Area
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Disease Response as Defined by RECIST 1.1 (Soft Tissue Lesions) and PCWG2 Criteria (Bone Lesions)
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]PSA Progression on Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate or Castrate Levels Post-BAT
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]PSA Progression on BAT (Bipolar Androgen Therapy )
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by IIEF
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by RANDSF-36
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by FACIT-F Score
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by PANAS
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response to Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT)
NCT02090114 (10) [back to overview]PSA Response to Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Post Bipolar Androgen Therapy
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Radiologic Assessment Mean Number of Bone Lesions Before and After the Treatment
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Safety Data Was Analyzed and Summarized in Subjects Who Receive at Least One Infusion of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride. Number of Adverse Events Are Being Reported.
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) in Pain (Between Baseline and End of Treatment)
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Before and After Treatment
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Bone Imaging Response (Number of Participants With Progression and Stable Disease)
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement (Between Baseline and End of Treatment) in Quality-of-Life Determined by the Minimum Increase From Baseline in Scores as Per the QOL CMI Criteria
NCT02097303 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) - Pain Severity Score
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) - Pain Interference Score
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02217566 (6) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT02257736 (5) [back to overview]Time to Chronic Opioid Use
NCT02257736 (5) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
NCT02257736 (5) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression
NCT02257736 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02257736 (5) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) or Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Number of Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSE)
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Tumor Response
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Single Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) in Participants With Presence and Absence of Biomarker
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Response Assessed Using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Intensity Score
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Time to Symptomatic Skeletal Event
NCT02485691 (14) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression (TTPP)
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]AUC (0-24 hr)
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]Testosterone Levels
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]Percent of Subjects With PSA-50 Response
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]PSA Levels
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone Levels
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]Steady State Trough Concentration of Arbiraterone
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf)
NCT02737332 (9) [back to overview]AUC (0-t)
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate as Assessed From Prostatectomy Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Pathologic T3 Disease After 3 Months of Treatment.
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Near Pathologic Complete Response After 3 Months of Treatment
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Without Biochemical Failure at 2 Years
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With no Nodal Metastases After 3 Months of Treatment.
NCT02849990 (7) [back to overview]The Proportion of Men Who Receive Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 12-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 2 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 3 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 4 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 4-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Positive Surgical Margins at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Cribriform at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Intra-operative Complications Following RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Intraductal Carcinoma at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Median of Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Combined pCR or MRD Rate [Part 1]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 3-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 2-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL Prior to RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 6-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of pCR at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 24-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Testosterone Levels
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Testosterone Complete Suppression
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen Levels
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Disease Progression
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen - 50 Response
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]PSA Response in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Trough Plasma PK (Cmin) of Rucaparib Based on Sparse Sampling
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: BPI-SF
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by IRR at 6 Months in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: EQ-5D-5L
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Interim Overall Survival in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Interim Overall Survival in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by IRR at 6 Months in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: FACT-P
NCT02975934 (18) [back to overview]PSA Response in Participants With a BRCA Alteration
NCT02987543 (3) [back to overview]Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) - Cohort A Only
NCT02987543 (3) [back to overview]Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) - Cohort A+B
NCT02987543 (3) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression - Cohort A Only
NCT03043807 (1) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence
NCT03279250 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT03279250 (2) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Rate of Pathologic Stage =< pT2N0 at Prostatectomy
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 1: Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade >=3 Severity
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 1: Part 1: Number of Participants With Specified Toxicity
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve for Niraparib From Time Zero to 168 Hours (AUC [0-168 Hours]/Dose) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 1: Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Niraparib Normalized by the Dose(Niraparib) (Cmax/Dose) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate After a Single Dose
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 168 Hours (AUC [0-168hr]) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade >=3 Severity
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 2: Composite Response Rate (RR)
NCT03431350 (11) [back to overview]Combination 1: Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03649841 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT03649841 (2) [back to overview]Rate of Undetectable Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) (< 0.2)
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Prostate Cancer (FACT-P)
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Symptomatic Skeletal Related Event (SSRE)
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) Event by Investigator Assessment
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Second Progression or Death (PFS2) Event
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Subsequent Anticancer Therapy or Death (TFST) Event
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to Pain Progression (TTPP) Event
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Opiate Use
NCT03732820 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Event
NCT03748641 (1) [back to overview]Cohort 1: Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
NCT03827473 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life - FACT/GOG-NTX
NCT03827473 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life - PROMIS Fatigue
NCT03827473 (5) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen Progression Free Survival (PSA-PFS)
NCT03827473 (5) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT03827473 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life - FACT-P
NCT03834519 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03834519 (2) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT03999515 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)

Serum Blood Levels of Testosterone Precursors

Concentration of Cortisol, Aldosterone, Corticosterone, 11-Deoxycortisol, Deoxycorticosterone and Dehydroepiandrostenedione Sulphate (DHEA-S) in blood was measured in nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL). (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 (within 3 days prior to Day 29)

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Cortisol; Baseline (n = 33)Cortisol; Cycle 2 (n = 29)Aldosterone; Baseline (n=33)Aldosterone; Cycle 2 (n=29)Corticosterone; Baseline (n=33)Corticosterone; Cycle 2 (n=27)11-Deoxycortisol; Baseline (n=31)11-Deoxycortisol; Cycle 2 (n=25)Deoxycorticosterone; Baseline (n=32)Deoxycorticosterone; Cycle 2 (n=28)DHEA-S; Baseline (n=32)DHEA-S; Cycle 2 (n=28)
1000 mg AA Therapy120004000881936797397361213000015000

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of Abiraterone

AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after first dose was given

Interventionhours*nmol/L (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 250 mg1369
Abiraterone Acetate 500 mg1448
Abiraterone Acetate 750 mg4537
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg4615
Abiraterone Acetate 2000 mg4983

[back to top]

Serum Blood Levels of Testosterone

Concentration of testosterone in blood was measured in nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL). (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 (within 3 days prior to Day 29)

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Baseline (n = 23)Cycle 2 (n = 28)
1000 mg AA Therapy31

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study medication

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
1000 mg/Day4120
2000 mg/Day32
250 mg/Day32
500 mg/Day32
750 mg/Day30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Tumor Response

Number of participants with objective response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Confirmed PR defined as greater than or equal to 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum LD according to RECIST. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study greater than or equal to 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (1160 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial response
1000 mg AA Therapy08

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Abiraterone

The Tmax is defined as actual sampling time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. The analyte concentration associated with Tmax is referred to as Cmax. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after first dose was given

Interventionhours (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 250 mg2.050
Abiraterone Acetate 500 mg2.588
Abiraterone Acetate 750 mg1.709
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg3.159
Abiraterone Acetate 2000 mg2.672

[back to top]

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Abiraterone

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after first dose was given

Interventionhour (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 250 mg11.6
Abiraterone Acetate 500 mg9.5
Abiraterone Acetate 750 mg10.8
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg10.6
Abiraterone Acetate 2000 mg12.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at Week 12

The PSA response was measured according to PSA working group (PSAWG) criteria. All participants achieving a fall in PSA of greater than 50 percent from baseline, which has been confirmed by a second measurement at least 4 weeks after initial documentation, fulfill criteria for confirmed PSA response. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
1000 mg AA Monotherapy10
1000 mg AA Therapy25

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Abiraterone

The Cmax is defined as maximum observed analyte concentration. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after first dose was given

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 250 mg219
Abiraterone Acetate 500 mg284
Abiraterone Acetate 750 mg1032
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg571
Abiraterone Acetate 2000 mg531

[back to top]

Duration of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Duration of PSA response in participants on abiraterone acetate therapy was measured as the duration between PSA 50 percent decline date and PSA progression date as defined by the PSAWG criteria. (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (1160 days)

InterventionDays (Median)
1000 mg AA Therapy141

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Abiraterone

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). (NCT00473512)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after first dose was given

Interventionhours*nmol/L (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 250 mg1253
Abiraterone Acetate 500 mg1334
Abiraterone Acetate 750 mg4294
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg4371
Abiraterone Acetate 2000 mg4754

[back to top]

Phase 1: Total Body Clearance (Cl_F_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
Interventionliter per hour (l/hr) (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)2649.954231.383
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)4288.456529.606
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)5440.949391.046
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)1518.748246.643

[back to top]

Phase 2: Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Decline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

Number of participants with greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA levels were assessed. PSA decline was evaluated according to (Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group) PSAWG criteria. Decrease in PSA levels represented improvement. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ConfirmedNot ConfirmedTotal
Phase II Dose Treatment26228

[back to top]

Phase 2: Participants With Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score

ECOG performance status score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0=fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2=ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (>) 50% of waking hours. 3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours. 4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. 5=dead. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline ECOG 0Baseline ECOG 1Baseline ECOG 2Baseline ECOG 3Baseline ECOG 4Best Post-Baseline ECOG 0Best Post-Baseline ECOG 1Best Post-Baseline ECOG 2Best Post-Baseline ECOG 3Best Post-Baseline ECOG 4
Phase II Dose Treatment2013000285000

[back to top]

Phase 1: Volume of Distribution (Vz_F_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Volume of distribution is normally calculated by using equation volume of distribution =dose/initial concentration. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
InterventionLiter (L) (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)25494.3984068.885
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)653.7453940.400
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)10252.0773418.280
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)13688.3672739.655

[back to top]

Phase 2: Radiographic Objective Response Rate (RAD-ORR)

The objective response rate is defined as the proportion of participants with measurable lesions achieving a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ConfirmedNot Confirmed
Phase II Dose Treatment91

[back to top]

Phase 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose) (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
Interventionhour (hr) (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)1.8334.000
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)2.0002.044
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)1.5002.667
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)2.0332.000

[back to top]

Phase 1: Terminal Half-life (HL_Lambda_z) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
Interventionhour (hr) (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)14.36112.454
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)5.2845.125
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)10.5916.913
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)7.0667.939

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3.

,,,
Interventionnanomoles per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)509.5002194.250
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)283.000421.000
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)330.633676.000
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)289.5331552.000

[back to top]

Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma-Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
Interventionhr*nmol/L (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)3039.93713695.482
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)1329.1781310.715
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)1625.0593624.781
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)1565.6598920.790

[back to top]

Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma-Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinite Time (AUCINF_obs) of Abiraterone Acetate

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements was taken on Day -7 at hour 0 (predose), at hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 (postdose). On Day -6 at 24 hour (postdose) and Day -5 at 48 hour (postdose). On Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3 (Predose). (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: At hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 post dose and pre-dose on day 1, day 8, day 15 and day 22 cycle 1, day 1 cycle 2 and day 1 cycle 3

,,,
Interventionhr*nmol/L (Mean)
FastedFed
Phase I Dose Escalation (1000mg)3478.38514404.387
Phase I Dose Escalation (250mg)1411.2681386.939
Phase I Dose Escalation (500mg)1781.3743839.804
Phase I Dose Escalation (750mg)1665.4549358.743

[back to top]

Phase 2: Time to PSA Progression

The time interval from the date of first dose of abiraterone acetate therapy to the date of the PSA progression as defined by the PSAWG criteria. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose Treatment497

[back to top]

Phase 2: Radiographic Progression Free Survival (RAD-PFS)

RAD-PFS is the time interval from the date of first dose of abiraterone acetate therapy to the date of death or radiographic disease progression according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: PSA Progression Free Survival (PSA-PFS)

PSA-PFS is the time interval from the date of first dose of abiraterone acetate therapy to the date of death or the PSA progression as defined by the Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose Treatment473

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival

Overall survival is the time interval from the date of first dose (cycle 1 day 1) of abiraterone acetate therapy to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to Month 60

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of PSA Response

Duration of PSA response was defined as the duration between the date of confirmed PSA response and subsequent PSA progression date as defined by the PSAWG criteria. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose Treatment477

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Objective Response

Duration of objective response was assessed only in participants who achieved a CR or PR, and measured from the first documented date of response to the first documented date of disease progression according to the RECIST criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Dose TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Abiraterone Acetate

The MTD is the highest dose of a drug or treatment that does not cause unacceptable side effects. (NCT00473746)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 12

Interventionmg/day (Number)
Phase I Dose EscalationNA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Time

Progression Free Survival was defined as the interval from the date of the first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of death or date of progressive disease (PD) as assessed by RECIST criteria. PD was at least 20 percent increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until first documented disease progression or death or up to end of study (Week 148; assessed on Day 1 of each cycle)

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate457

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at Week 12

The PSA response was evaluated according to Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria, which was, greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA from Baseline and confirmed by subsequent measurement at least 4 weeks later. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate36.2

[back to top]

Duration of PSA Response

Duration of PSA response was the time between the date of first PSA response (greater than or equal to 50 percent decline from Baseline) and the date of PSA progression as defined by the PSAWG. PSA progression was defined as a 50 percent increase over the nadir PSA value, increase in the PSA level by at least 5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and confirmed by second consecutive measurement. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until first documented disease progression or up to end of study (Week 148; assessed on Days 1, 8 of Cycle 1, thereafter Day 1 of each Cycle)

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate169

[back to top]

Shift From Baseline in Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score at Post-dose (Week 148)

The ECOG performance status score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0=fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; 2=ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (>) 50 percentage of waking hours; 3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50 percentage of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; and 5=dead. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until first documented disease progression or up to end of study (Week 148; assessed on Day 1 of each cycle)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, ECOG 0Baseline, ECOG 1Baseline, ECOG 2Best Post-Baseline. ECOG 0Best Post-Baseline. ECOG 1Best Post-Baseline. ECOG 2
Abiraterone Acetate1627425193

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

The time to PSA progression was the interval from the date of the first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of PSA progression as defined by the PSAWG criteria. PSA progression was defined as a 50 percent increase over the nadir PSA value, increase in the PSA level by at least 5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and confirmed by second consecutive measurement. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until first documented disease progression or up to end of study (Week 148; assessed on Days 1, 8 of Cycle 1, thereafter Day 1 of each Cycle)

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate169

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval from the date of the first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of death. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until death, or end of study (Week 148)

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate380

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Objective Tumor Response as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

The objective tumor response was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) on tumor response assessed as per RECIST. The CR was disappearance of all lesions. The PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum LD. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline until first documented disease progression or end of study visit (Week 148; assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 4, 7, 10, and thereafter Day 1 of each cycle)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate26.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

The PSA response was evaluated according to Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria, which was, greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA from Baseline and confirmed by subsequent measurement at least 4 weeks later. (NCT00474383)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate44.7

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen Based Progression-free Survival (PSA-PFS)

The PSA-PFS is defined as time to first PSA failure (that is, two consecutive increases in PSA of 50 percent and greater than or equal to 5 nanogram per milliliter, as per Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group [PSAWG] criterion) or death or the start of secondary anti-tumor therapy, whichever occurs first. If a PSA progression or death does not occur, subject will be censored at the last PSA evaluation. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of each cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone141

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

The time interval from first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of PSA progression as defined by the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria. If a PSA progression does not occur, subject will be censored at the last PSA evaluation. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Day 8 of Cycle 1, thereafter Day 1 of each cycle up to end of study (60 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone169

[back to top]

Time to Radiographic Progression

Time to radiographic progression is defined as the time from first dose until the first radiographic progression date that was confirmed. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 4, 7 and 10, and thereafter every third cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone88

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit was defined as an observation of at least 1 of the following: PSA response by PSAWG criteria; radiographic response by RECIST criteria; stable disease by RECIST criteria lasting 6 months; or improvement by at least 1 unit in ECOG performance status. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 4, 7 and 10, and thereafter every third cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Disease StabilizationChange in participant ECOG score
Abiraterone1216

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Radiographic Response

Percentage of participants with radiographic objective response is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best overall response based on reconciled radiographic disease assessment according to RECIST Version 1.0. The CR is disappearance of all lesions. The PR is at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 4, 7 and 10, and thereafter every third cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
Abiraterone06.3

[back to top]

Shift From Baseline in Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score

ECOG performance status score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0=fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, 2=ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (>) 50 percent of waking hours, 3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50 percent of waking hours, 4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair and 5=dead. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of each cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline:0; Best Post-dose:0Baseline:0; Best Post-dose:1Baseline:0; Best Post-dose:2Baseline:0; Best Post-dose:3Baseline:0; Best Post-dose:4Baseline:1; Best Post-dose:0Baseline:1; Best Post-dose:1Baseline:1; Best Post-dose:2Baseline:1; Best Post-dose:3Baseline:1; Best Post-dose:4Baseline:2; Best Post-dose:0Baseline:2; Best Post-dose:1Baseline:2; Best Post-dose:2Baseline:2; Best Post-dose:3Baseline:2; Best Post-dose:4Baseline:0; Worst Post-dose:0Baseline:0; Worst Post-dose:1Baseline:0; Worst Post-dose:2Baseline:0; Worst Post-dose:3Baseline:0; Worst Post-dose:4Baseline:1; Worst Post-dose:0Baseline:1; Worst Post-dose:1Baseline:1; Worst Post-dose:2Baseline:1; Worst Post-dose:3Baseline:1; Worst Post-dose:4Baseline:2; Worst Post-dose:0Baseline:2; Worst Post-dose:1Baseline:2; Worst Post-dose:2Baseline:2; Worst Post-dose:3Baseline:2; Worst Post-dose:4
Abiraterone22200014152001100061710002461000200

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The RAD-PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 4, 7 and 10, and thereafter every third cycle until first documented disease progression or up to 60 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone126

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the interval from the date of the first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of death. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Every 3 months until death or up to 60 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Abiraterone492

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

The PSA response was evaluated according to Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criterion, which is, greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA from Baseline during the study, which would be subsequently confirmed by a measurement that is at least 4 or more weeks after initial documentation of PSA response. (NCT00485303)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (of 28 days each) up to Cycle 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone37.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Detectable Bone Marrow Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Level (>9 Picograms/Mililiter)

(NCT00544440)
Timeframe: Baseline (predose Week 1 Day 1) and Week 8

InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
Baseline (predose Week 1 Day 1) (n=49)Week 8 (n=44)
Abiraterone Acetate22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Detectable Bone Marrow Testosterone Level (>1 Picograms/Mililiter)

(NCT00544440)
Timeframe: Baseline (predose Week 1 Day 1) and Week 8

InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
Baseline (predose Week 1 Day 1) (n=49)Week 8 (n=44)
Abiraterone Acetate00

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving a Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline >=50%

A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a >=50% decline from baseline. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate232
Placebo22

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate450.0
Placebo332.0

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression According to Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group Criteria

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression as defined in the protocol-specific Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria, namely, a PSA level of at least 5 ng/ml that has risen on at least 2 successive occasions, at least 2 weeks apart. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate309.0
Placebo200.0

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-free Survival

Radiographic progression-free survival is based on imaging studies according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): baseline lymph node size must be >=2.0 cm to be considered a target lesion; progression on bone scans with >=2 new lesions not consistent with tumor flare, confirmed on a second scan >=6 weeks later that shows >=1 additional new lesion. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 11 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate171.0
Placebo110.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWith Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)541208
Placebo524148
Placebo to Abiraterone Acetate9339

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of PSA progression as defined in the protocol-specific prostate cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria. A participant was considered to have a PSA progression if the PSA level had a 25 percent (%) or greater increase from nadir and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram/milliliter ((ng/mL) or more, which is confirmed by a second value obtained in 3 or more weeks. Participants who had no PSA progression at the time of the analysis were censored at the last known date of no PSA progression. Participants with no on-study PSA assessment or no baseline PSA assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to date of PSA progerssion or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)11.07
Placebo5.55

[back to top]

Time to Opiate Use for Prostate Cancer Pain

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use for cancer pain. Participants who have no opiate use at the time of analysis were censored at the last known date of no opiate use for cancer pain. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first opiate use or end of study (Month 60)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)33.38
Placebo23.39

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Participants who had no cytotoxic chemotherapy administration at the time of analysis were censored at the last known date when no cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)25.17
Placebo16.82

[back to top]

Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by >=1 Point

The time interval from the date of randomization to the first date at which there was at least a 1 grade change (worsening) in the ECOG performance status grade. Participants who had no deterioration in ECOG performance status grade at the time of the analysis were censored at the last known date of no deterioration. ECOG is a 5-point scale, where 0=Fully active, 1=Ambulatory, carry out work of sedentary nature, 2=Ambulatory, capable of all self-care, 3=Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=Completely disabled, no self-care, totally confined to bed or chair, 5=Dead. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first radiographic progression or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)12.29
Placebo10.87

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

The rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the occurrence of one of the following: 1) a participant was considered to have progressed by bone scan if - a) the first bone scan with greater than or equal to (>=) 2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and was confirmed by a second bone scan taken >=6 weeks later showing >=2 additional new lesions (a total of >=4 new lesions compared to baseline), b) the first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in >=12 weeks from randomization and the new lesions were verified on the next bone scan >=6 weeks later (a total of >=2 new lesions compared to baseline); 2) progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3) death from any cause. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first radiographic progression or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)NA
Placebo8.28

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to end of study (Month 60)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)34.66
Placebo30.29

[back to top]

Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression

Defined as the date of an increase of 2ng/mL or more above the Prostate specific antigen nadir achieved after completion of radiation with the date of progression defined as the date on which that value was measured. Distribution of time-to-event variables will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Estimated with two-sided 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionyears (Mean)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)5

[back to top]

Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry

The levels from patients treated in this study will be compared to a control set of biopsies acquired from a separate but similar population of men with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with three months of combined Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and bicalutamide as part of standard of care. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpg/mg (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)0.050

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0

Incidence of acute and chronic grade 3 or greater toxicity as evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0he distribution of time to late adverse events (observed severities of adverse events over time) will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months after initiation of radiation therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who had positive surgical margins. A positive surgical margin is defined as tumor extending to the inked-surface or margin of the prostate. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa6
LHRHa6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a drop in PSA value to less than or equal to 0.2 ng/mL. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa32
LHRHa0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group with a pathology tumor stage less than or equal to pT2. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa24
LHRHa8

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Decline of > 50%

(NCT01199146)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from beginning of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate19

[back to top]

Time To Progression (TTP)

(NCT01199146)
Timeframe: beginning of treatment until disease progression according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria

Interventionweeks (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate16

[back to top]

Preliminary Evidence of Efficacy of Abiraterone Acetate

number of patients with ≥ 30% PSA decline after 12 weeks of abiraterone treatment (NCT01199146)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from beginning of abiraterone treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate20

[back to top]

Number of Patients With PSA Partial Response

PSA reduction to < 4 ng/ml, but >0.2 ng/ml (NCT01309672)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone13

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Undetectable PSA

undetectable PSA defined as <= 0.2 ng/mL. Patients not responding in the first year were deemed non-responders. (NCT01309672)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT01309672)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone25.8

[back to top]

Objective Progression-free Survival

Progression defined as unequivocal progression of disease, progressive disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), progressive disease as defined by the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group bone scan progression criteria, or death due to disease. (NCT01309672)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone17.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Toxicity of Abiraterone Acetate

Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01309672)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedAnorexiaAspartate aminotransferase increasedHyperglycemiaHypertensionHypokalemiaINR increasedLeukocytosisLung infectionNauseaRectal hemorrhageThromboembolic eventVomitingWeight gain
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone21222211121121

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) During the Core Study

Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA levels was assessed. (NCT01314118)
Timeframe: End of core study visit (Approximately at Month 6)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone86.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels After 3 Cycles of Treatment

Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA levels was assessed. Decrease in PSA levels represented improvement. (NCT01314118)
Timeframe: End of Cycle 3 (Approximately Month 3)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone85.2

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression is defined as the time interval from the date of enrollment (Day 1) to the date of first evidence of PSA progression. A participant was considered to have a PSA progression if the PSA level had a 25 percent (%) or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram (ng)/milliliter (mL) or more, which is confirmed by a second value obtained in 3 or more weeks. (NCT01314118)
Timeframe: Maximum up to Month 30.5

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone28.7

[back to top]

Time to Radiographic Evidence of Disease Progression (TTRP)

Time to radiographic evidence of disease progression is defined as the time interval from the date of enrollment (Day 1) to the date of disease progression. A participant was considered as progressed by bone scan if: 1) The appearance of greater than or equal to (>=) 2 new lesions, and, following the first assessment, a confirmatory scan performed 6 or more weeks later that shows a minimum of 2 or more additional new lesions, 2) If >=2 new lesions are seen on scans following the first assessment, the confirmation is still required after 6 weeks; however, 2 addition lesions are not required to confirm progression, and 3) The date of progression is the date of the first scan that shows the changes. (NCT01314118)
Timeframe: Maximum up to Month 30.5

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and PrednisoneNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease achieving a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exemestane6.3
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone5.8
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Estradiol and Estrone) at End of Treatment

Change from baseline in serum endocrine biomarkers (estradiol and estrone) was summarized by treatment at end of treatment. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of treatment (approximately 2 years)

,,
InterventionPicomoles Per Liter (Pmol/L) (Mean)
EstradiolEstrone
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone-1.04-30.60
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone-3.35-28.09
Exemestane1.53-34.20

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of disease progression (either radiographic or clinical), or death from any cause. PFS was determined using radiographic progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) on measurable lesions captured by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical disease progression was considered only when disease progression could not be confirmed by CT or MRI, such as when the disease site is skin, bone marrow, or central nervous system. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Exemestane3.68
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone3.65
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone4.47

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease achieving a best overall response of a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months based on RECIST. Stable disease: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exemestane12.7
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone9.6
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone22.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of objective response was measured from the first time that the CR or PR was achieved to the first observation of disease progression (either radiographic or clinical) based on the RECIST criteria. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Exemestane6.47
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone4.86
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone6.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) at End of Treatment

Change from baseline in serum endocrine biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) was summarized by treatment at end of treatment. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of treatment (approximately 2 years)

,,
InterventionNanomoles Per Liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
ProgesteroneTestosterone
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone12.34-0.48
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone8.98-0.51
Exemestane-4.80-0.09

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
ExemestaneNA
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone26.41
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + PrednisoneNA

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response was defined as decline of 50% from baseline confirmed by a PSA at least 4 weeks later based on Prostate-specific Antigen Working Group-2 (PSAWG-2) (2008) criteria. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: PSA was measured at baseline and day 1 of every cycle on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride34

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented first observation of progressive disease (PD). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Disease evaluation occurred every 12 weeks while patients were receiving treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride11

[back to top]

Change in Serum Androgen Levels

Serum androgen levels measured based on established methods. The change from baseline to progression was calculated for each participant. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Pairs of patients' samples for androgen analyses were obtained at baseline and at time of progression. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionng/dl (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride1.2

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time between registration and documented PSA progression. PSA progression based on Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group-2 (PSAWG-2) (2008) criteria was an increase of >/=25% and >/= 2 ng/ml after 12 weeks for patients without a PSA decline from baseline and an increase of >/=25% and >/= 2 ng/ml above the nadir, confirmed by a 2nd value 3 weeks or later for patients with a PSA decline from baseline. PSA progression was reported not duration of response. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: PSA was measured at baseline and day 1 of every cycle on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride5

[back to top]

Presence of AR Amplification

Presence of AR amplification was measured by established methods. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Patients' samples were evaluated at baseline and every 12 weeks on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride10

[back to top]

Change in Serum Levels of Testosterone

Serum testosterone levels were estimated based on established methods. The change from baseline to progression was calculated for each participant. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Samples for testosterone analyses were obtained at baseline and at time of progression. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride0.25

[back to top] [back to top]

Best Overall Response

Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 12 weeks cycles on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride6

[back to top]

Cumulative CD54 Upregulation Ratio Between the Cohorts.

An analysis of variance model for the log transformed cumulative CD54 upregulation ratio (CD54 upregulation is the fold increase in the final product (FP) from buoyant density separations (BDS) step 65. BDS65 step refers to sample taken after both BDS77 and BDS65 but before ex vivo culture in the presence of antigen PA2024. FP refers to sample taken after ex vivo culture) that includes the antigen concentration cohort as the independent variable was performed. Subjects who received all 3 infusions were included. (NCT01487863)
Timeframe: Over the course of sipuleucel-T therapy (approximately 1 month)

InterventionRatio ofCD54 molecules on BDS65:FP cells (Mean)
Concurrent Arm36.72
Sequential Arm41.61

[back to top]

Change in Tissue Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone

Tissue testosterone will be measured in biopsy tissues (NCT01503229)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 4

Interventionpg/mg (Median)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)0.156

[back to top]

Phase 2: Objective Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Objective PFS was defined as the time interval between the date of enrollment and the first occurrence of any of the events:~1) Radiological tumor progression (assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) was defined as at least a 20 percent increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. in case of progressive disease (PD) diagnosed only on non target bone lesions on bone scan, PD was to be considered only in case of appearance of at least 2 new lesions on bone scan confirmed 6 weeks later by another bone scan, and at least the appearance of 2 new additional lesions. 2) Death due to any cause.~Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: From baseline until radiological tumor or disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to Month 5

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mgNA

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cabazitaxel in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate

MTD was defined as highest dose level of cabazitaxel in combination with abiraterone acetate at which no more than 1 participant experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLT). DLT was defined as any of the following events related to study treatment: 1) Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological related adverse event with exception of Grade 3 fever without documented infection; Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea in the absence of effective maximal therapy; and Grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction in the absence of required premedication. 2) Hematological toxicity: Febrile neutropenia (fever of unknown origin ≥38.5°C with neutropenia Grade 3 or 4); Neutropenia Grade 4 lasting >7 days; Thrombocytopenia Grade 4 or Grade 3 complicated by hemorrhage. 3) Re-treatment delay of more than 2 weeks due to delayed recovery from a toxicity related to study treatment to baseline or ≤ Grade 1 (except for alopecia). Grades were based on National Cancer Institute CommonTerminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 2 of Phase 1 (up to 42 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1: Overall Population25

[back to top]

Phase 2: PSA Progression Free Survival

"Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was defined as the time interval between the date of treatment start and the date of either first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. PSA was to be measured at baseline, every 3 weeks, throughout study period, until progression. PSA progression was defined as: -An increase of 25% above the nadir (at least 2 ng/mL), confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart, in participants who have achieved a ≥50% decline of PSA. -An increase in PSA by 25 % above the baseline level (at least 2 ng/mL), confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart, in participants who have not achieved a ≥50% decline of PSA.~Analysis was performed by Kaplan Meire method." (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (maximum duration: 603 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg6.93

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 5 minutes before cabazitaxel infusion; at end of cabazitaxel infusion; 0.25 hours post-cabazitaxel infusion; any time between 1 to 4 hours, between 6 to 24 hours, between 48 to 96 hours post cabazitaxel infusion on Day 1-Cycle 1

InterventionL/m^2 (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg2711

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response was defined as having complete response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) assessed by RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level and all lymph nodes size was <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters). (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 12 weeks there after until disease progression (maximum duration: 603 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg21.4

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the date of treatment start to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earlier of the last date the participant was known to be alive and the study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: From baseline up to death or study cut-off (maximum duration: 603 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mgNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response. PSA was to be measured at baseline, every 3 weeks, throughout study period, until progression. PSA progression was defined as: -An increase of 25% above the nadir (at least 2 ng/mL), confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart, in participants who have achieved a ≥50% decline of PSA. -An increase in PSA by 25 % above the baseline level (at least 2 ng/mL), confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart, in participants who have not achieved a ≥50% decline of PSA. (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (maximum duration: 603 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg46.2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated using the trapezoidal method from time zero to 24 hours corresponding to abiraterone acetate dosing interval. (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 0 hour (before abiraterone administration); 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post abiraterone administration on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg928

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Concentration Observed Just Before Treatment Administration During Repeated Dosing at Steady State (Ctrough ss)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: Pre abiraterone dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg9.99

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : First Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 0 hour (before abiraterone administration); 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post abiraterone administration on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionhour (Median)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg2.00

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Abiraterone : Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Cmax)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 0 hour (before abiraterone administration); 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post abiraterone administration on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg216

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)

Area under the concentration-time curve calculated using the following equation: AUC = Plasma clearance (CL)/dose (NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 5 minutes before cabazitaxel infusion; at end of cabazitaxel infusion; 0.25 hours post-cabazitaxel infusion; any time between 1 to 4 hours, between 6 to 24 hours, between 48 to 96 hours post cabazitaxel infusion on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg817

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Cmax)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 5 minutes before cabazitaxel infusion; at end of cabazitaxel infusion; 0.25 hours post-cabazitaxel infusion; any time between 1 to 4 hours, between 6 to 24 hours, between 48 to 96 hours post cabazitaxel infusion on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg330

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Terminal Half-life (t 1/2z)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 5 minutes before cabazitaxel infusion; at end of cabazitaxel infusion; 0.25 hours post-cabazitaxel infusion; any time between 1 to 4 hours, between 6 to 24 hours, between 48 to 96 hours post cabazitaxel infusion on Day 1-Cycle 1

Interventionhour (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg91.6

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic of Cabazitaxel : Total Plasma Clearance (CL)

(NCT01511536)
Timeframe: 5 minutes before cabazitaxel infusion; at end of cabazitaxel infusion; 0.25 hours post-cabazitaxel infusion; any time between 1 to 4 hours, between 6 to 24 hours, between 48 to 96 hours post cabazitaxel infusion on Day 1-Cycle 1

InterventionL/h/m^2 (Mean)
Phase 2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/ m^2 + Abiraterone 1000 mg31.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, leads to a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a participant, or is an important medical event. (NCT01517802)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone/Prednisolone16

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time to PSA progression (25% increase from baseline), radiographic progression, or death. (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Fasting)8.6
Arm II (Fed)8.6

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration of Abiraterone

Analyzed on a log scale due to skewness of distribution (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionlog(ng/mL) (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)5.39
Arm II (Fed)4.65

[back to top]

Adrenal Androgen Production (DHEA-S)

Extragonadal serum adrogen (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Cycle 4 (4 months)

Interventionmicrogram per deciliter (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)13.30
Arm II (Fed)10.22

[back to top]

Change in PSA Level

Data were analyzed on a log scale: log(week 12) - log(baseline) = log ratio. Smaller (more negative) values indicate a better outcome. (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: From baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionlog ratio (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)-1.19
Arm II (Fed)-1.59

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Patients with grade 3 or higher AE (CTCAE Version 4.03) (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Fasting)6
Arm II (Fed)11

[back to top]

Rates of PSA Decline

Change in PSA from baseline to 12 weeks (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)-41.1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)-52.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time from randomization to disease progression or death. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)10.1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)11.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rates in Patients With Measurable Disease.

Overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)18
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)24

[back to top]

Confirmed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

50% or greater decline in PSA from baseline. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)46
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)55

[back to top]

Grade 4 or 5 Adverse Events

Grade 4 or greater toxicity graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at least possibly related to treatment. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of study treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)3

[back to top]

Comparison of Circulating Androstenedione Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline androstenedione levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Androstenedione in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
Androstenedione in Responders (STD)NA

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression for Dose Escalation Cohort

Time to PSA progression as defined by RECIST criteria or by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG) criteria for patients whom were treated with increased dose Abiraterone Acetate. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation12

[back to top] [back to top]

Comparison of Circulating DHEA Levels Between Primary-Resistant and Responders

The distribution of the baseline DHEA levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Initial drawProgression / Week 12
DHEA in Primary Resistant (STD)56.228.5
DHEA in Responders (STD)79.413.5

[back to top]

Serum Concentration Levels of Abiraterone Acetate Over Time

Pharmacokinetic assessment at the initiation of standard dose therapy, at the time of initial disease progression, at the time of a response to increased dose of abiraterone acetate and at the time of disease progression on increased-dose therapy. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionnanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) (Median)
Concentration at First Draw on Standard Dose Therapy (4 Weeks)5.5
Concentration at Time of Disease Progression on Standard Dose14.2
Concentration at Time of Disease Progression on Increased Dose31.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With PSA Response From Dose Escalation

A PSA response for the dose escalation group is defined as a participant with a documented PSA decline after 12 weeks of therapy with standard-dose, then had disease progression, and then achieved a ≥30% PSA decline after 12 weeks from the start of dose escalation therapy. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of dose escalation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation0

[back to top]

Correlation of Circulating Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Levels From Baseline to Week 12

"Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) will be calculated to summarize the relationship between DHEA values at baseline and at 12 weeks. DHEA labs will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. Coefficients are on a continuous scale ranging from -1 to +1 with a value of -1 indicating a perfect negative linear association of DHEA levels between the 2 time points, a value of 0 indicating no association between DHEA levels between the two time points, and a value of +1 indicating a positive linear association of DHEA levels between the two time points." (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (r) (Number)
Standard Dose0

[back to top]

Comparison of Circulating Testosterone Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline testosterone levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionNanograms per decilitre (ng/dL) (Mean)
Testosterone in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
Testosterone in Responders (STD)NA

[back to top]

Comparison of Circulating DHEA-S Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline DHEA-S levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmicrogram per deciliter (µg/dL) (Mean)
DHEA-S in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
DHEA-S in Responders (STD)NA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Androstenedione Concentration in Blood

Androstenedione concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-0.24

[back to top]

Bone Scan Response at EoT

PD: ≥1 of 3 criteria: PSA progression: ≥2 rising PSA levels, interval of ≥1 week between each determination. Soft tissue disease progression: RECIST 1.1. Bone disease progression: PCWG2 criteria (≥2 or new lesions on bone scan compared with prior scan). Target lesion CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR as ≥30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, referencing baseline sum LD, SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referencing smallest sum LD since treatment start, PD ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions, referencing smallest sum LD recorded since treatment start or appearance of ≥1 new lesions. Non-target lesions CR: disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, SD: persistence of ≥1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits, PD: appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Progressive Disease (PD)Non-CR/Non-PDNot Evaluable
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone115351

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cortisol in Bone Marrow Aspirate

Cortisol in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-46.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone Concentration in Blood

Pregnenolone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionpg/ml (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone1507.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone in Bone Marrow Aspirate

Pregnenolone in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionpg/ml (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone1381.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Androstenedione in Bone Marrow Aspirate

Androstenedione in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-0.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Progesterone Concentration in Blood

Progesterone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone1.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Progesterone in Bone Marrow Aspirate

Progesterone in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone1.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EoT) in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Prostate-specific antigen progression by Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) was defined as a PSA increase ≥25% and ≥2 ng/ml above the post-baseline nadir, and which was confirmed by the first subsequent value of 3 or more weeks later. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.

Interventionug/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone36.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Blood

Testosterone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-0.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cortisol Concentration in Blood

Cortisol concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-48.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Bone Marrow Aspirate

Testosterone concentration in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-19.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urine N-Telopeptide

Bone metabolism marker urine N-telopeptide levels were derived from urine samples collected. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

InterventionnmolBCE/mmolcreat (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone29.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to EoT in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase

Bone metabolism marker bone specific alkaline phosphatase levels were derived from blood samples collected. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.

Interventionug/L (Geometric Mean)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone-5.18

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response for Soft Tissue Lesions According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST)

Objective response was based on RECIST version 1.1 for soft tissue lesion on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) / Computerized tomography (CT) and the PCWG2 guidelines for bone lesions on bone scans and was defined as partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on the investigators' assessments of target, non-target and new lesions while on study treatment. The 95% for objective response rate was based on exact binomial 95% confidence interval (Clopper-Pearson). (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Up to 1849 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone68.8

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was measured as the time from the date of first dose of any drug of the study combination treatment until the first evidence of documented progression (a composite endpoint consisting of radiographic progression or PSA progression by PCWG2 or clinical deterioration) or death in the absence of progression (whichever came first) or the date last known to be progression free. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley robust non-parametric method. (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: Up to 1849 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone251

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event occurring or worsening between the start of study treatment date and the latest date of 30 days after the last dose date or the 30-day follow-up visit date, and not later than the data cut-off date or the date of death. AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) guidelines (V4.03). (NCT01650194)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up 30 days following the last dose of study drug date, with a median duration of treatment of 10.1 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEEnzalutamide-related TEAEsAbiraterone-related TEAEsPrednisone-related TEAEsDeathsSerious TEAEsEnzalutamide-related serious TEAEsAbiraterone-related serious TEAEsPrednisone-related serious TEAEsTEAEs leading to discontinuation of enzalutamideEnza-related TEAEs leading to disc. of enzaAbiraterone-related TEAEs leading to disc. of enzaPrednisone-related TEAEs leading to disc. of enzaTEAEs leading to discontinuation of abirateroneAbiraterone-related TEAEs leading to disc. of abi
Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone60565816010020300011

[back to top]

Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts

Compare arms to determine circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts for patients at baseline and while on study (NCT01681433)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Best CTC Change from Baseline >=5 to <5Best CTC Change from Baseline <5 to <5Best CTC Change from Baseline >=5 to >=5Best CTC Change from Baseline<5 to >=5
Control Arm: Arm B415101
Experimental: Arm A81671

[back to top]

Objective Response

Compare arms to determine the objective response of study patients, per RECIST 1.1 (NCT01681433)
Timeframe: 60 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Control Arm: Arm B0525
Experimental: Arm A1626

[back to top]

PSA Response

Compare arms to determine the proportion of patients who have a PSA response (≥ 30% decline) and any PSA decline post-randomization. (NCT01681433)
Timeframe: 60 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PSA DECLINE >= 30%PSA DELCINE >=50 %ANY DECLINE
Control Arm: Arm B2111
Experimental: Arm A2213

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Compare arms to determine the time to disease progression of study patients (NCT01681433)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Experimental: Arm A1.9055
Control Arm: Arm B1.0842

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

To ascertain whether Arm A has a greater proportion of patients observed to be alive without progression at Day 60 (±7 days) as compared to Arm B. (NCT01681433)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Experimental: Arm A12
Control Arm: Arm B6

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was measured as the time interval from the date of the first dose to the date of PSA progression as defined in the protocol-specific PSAWG criteria. For participants who have achieved a greater than or equal to (>=) 50% decrease from the baseline PSA, assessment of time to disease progression is when the PSA has increased 50% above the nadir and at a minimum of 5 nanogram/mililiter (ng/mL). For participants without a PSA decrease of this magnitude or without a decrease, the time for progression is calculated at the time a 25% increase from baseline PSA has been achieved. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone141

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

The PSA response was evaluated according to Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criterion, which is, greater than or equal to 50 percent decrease in PSA from Baseline during the study, which would be subsequently confirmed by a measurement that is at least 4 or more weeks after initial documentation of PSA response. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone42.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Radiographic Response

Percentage of participants with radiographic objective response is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best overall response based on reconciled radiographic disease assessment according to RECIST Version 1.0. The CR is disappearance of all lesions. The PR is at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Up to 3 Years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone6.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose to the date of death due to any reason. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Up to 3 Years

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone538

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone

Median serum testosterone concentration was reported at baseline and End-of-Treatment visit. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Baseline and End-of-Treatment Visit (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionnanomole per liter (Median)
BaselineEnd-of-Treatment Visit
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone1.2101.210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Up to 3 Years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone8140

[back to top]

Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S)

Median DHEA-S concentration was reported at baseline and End-of-Treatment visit. (NCT01685983)
Timeframe: Baseline and End-of-Treatment Visit (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmicromole per liter (Median)
BaselineEnd-of-Treatment Visit
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisolone0.7250.080

[back to top]

DB Phase: Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 3.8 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)561.00
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)579.00

[back to top]

DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSA Response

Percentage of participants who achieved PSA response (defined as >= 50% PSA decline from baseline) according to PSAWG criteria were reported. PSAWG criteria- Decline from baseline and reach response criteria: >= 50% increase over the nadir and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 ng/mL (or back to the baseline), which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later; Decline from baseline but not reach response criteria: >=25% increase over the nadir and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 ng/mL, which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later; and No decline from baseline: >=25% increase over the baseline and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 ng/mL, which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 3.8 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)18.3
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)54.5

[back to top]

DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Pain Palliation

Percentage of participants experiencing pain palliation were reported. A participant is responder if experienced >=30% reduction in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain intensity score over 24 hours observed at 2 consecutive evaluations 4 weeks apart without any increase in analgesic usage score (best response). Analgesic usage was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0=no analgesic, 1=non-opioid analgesics, 2=opioids for moderate pain and 3=opioids for severe pain. BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Total score (average of individual questions) ranges from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 3.8 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)31.8
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)54.5

[back to top]

DB Phase: Time to Pain Progression

Time to Pain progression calculated as number of days from date of randomization to date of pain progression. Pain progression- worsening of pain due to metastatic bone disease defined as increase of >=30% in worst pain over past 24 hours on BPI-SF numeric rating scale at 2 consecutive evaluations 4 weeks apart without decrease in analgesic usage score (in 2 corresponding consecutive evaluation in analgesic usage score, if there is missing visit, use existing visit only) or increase in analgesic usage score >=30% at 2 consecutive evaluations 4 weeks apart. BPI-SF is 11-item questionnaire which includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions. Total score (average of individual questions) ranges from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores= greater pain. Analgesic usage was scored on scale of 0 to 3 where 0=no analgesic, 1=non-opioid analgesics, 2=opioids for moderate pain and 3=opioids for severe pain. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 3.8 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)169.00
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)505.00

[back to top]

DB Phase: Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression (PSA)

Time to PSA progression was defined as time interval from the date of randomization to the date of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression as defined in the Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria. PSAWG criteria- Decline from baseline and reach response criteria: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) increase over the nadir and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (or back to the baseline), which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later; Decline from baseline but not reach response criteria: >=25% increase over the nadir and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 ng/mL, which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later; and No decline from baseline: >=25% increase over the baseline and the increase in the absolute-value by at least 5 ng/mL, which is confirmed by a second value 4 or more weeks later. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Up to 1.8 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)84.00
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)169.00

[back to top]

DB Phase: Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Score at End of Treatment

"The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a brief participant-reported questionnaire that measures the severity of fatigue based on the worst fatigue experienced during the past 24-hours. BFI has nine items. Three items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours, with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being fatigue as bad as you can imagine. Six items assess the amount that fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. The interference items include general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (includes both work outside the home and housework), relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The interference items are measured on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being does not interfere and 10 being completely interferes. BFI Total Score is the average of the nine items, ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (high fatigue)." (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Baseline, at End of Treatment (15 and 30 days after the last dose [up to 3.8 years])

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fatigue NowUsual FatigueWorst FatigueGeneral ActivityMoodWalking AbilityNormal WorkRelations with Other PeopleEnjoyment of Life
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)1.71.51.61.71.81.82.01.61.9
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)2.42.42.62.32.72.42.22.02.5

[back to top]

DB Phase: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire: Total Scores at the End of Treatment

FACT-P assesses symptoms/problems related to prostate carcinoma and its treatment. It is a combination of the FACT- General + the Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS) (Range 1-156, higher scores better). The FACT-General (FACT-G) is a 28 item Quality of Life (QOL) measure that provides a total score as well as subscale scores: Physical (0-28), Functional (0-28), Social (0-28), and Emotional (0-24) Well-being. The total range was between 1-108, higher scores better. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Treatment Outcome Index (FACT-TOI) is derived from the sum of the Physical Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Prostate Cancer subscale scores; a sensitive measure of patient-reported health (Range 1-104, higher scores better). PCS is a 12-item prostate cancer subscale that asks about symptoms and problems specific to prostate cancer (Range 0-48, higher scores better). (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Baseline, at End of Treatment (15 and 30 days after the last dose [up to 3.8 years])

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Total ScorePhysical Well-beingFunctional Well-beingEmotional Well-beingSocial Well-beingFACT-G Total ScoreProstate Cancer Subscale (PCS)Treatment Outcome Index (FACT-TOI)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)-16.1-4.9-2.7-2.4-1.2-11.2-4.9-12.5
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)-19.9-6.7-5.1-2.1-0.8-14.6-5.3-17.1

[back to top]

DB Phase: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. RECIST criteria for CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT01695135)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 3.8 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone (Double-blind)4.2
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (Double-blind)17.5

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of Chemotherapy

Time to initiation of chemotherapy was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADTNA
Placebo + ADT57.59

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT53.32
Placebo + ADT36.53

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Radiographic PFS was defined as the time (in months) interval from randomization to the first date of radiographic progression or death. Radiographic progression included progression by bone scan (according to modified Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 [PCWG2] criteria), defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan and progression of soft tissue lesions by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1 criteria). As per the RECIST 1.1 guideline, progression requires a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and a minimum absolute increase of 5 millimeter (mm) in the sum as compared to nadir sum of diameter. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 44 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT33.02
Placebo + ADT14.78

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression

"Time to pain progression was defined as the time (in months) interval from randomization to the first date a participant experienced a greater than or equal to (>=) 30 percent (%) increase in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) from baseline in the BPI-SF worst pain intensity (Item 3) observed at 2 consecutive evaluations (>=4) weeks apart. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing pain as bad as you can imagine." (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT47.41
Placebo + ADT16.62

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of PSA progression, according to PCWG2 criteria. PCWG2 defines PSA progression as the date that a 25 percent (%) or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) or more from the nadir is documented, which is confirmed by a second value obtained 3 or more weeks later. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT33.31
Placebo + ADT7.43

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Subsequent Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Time to subsequent therapy was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of subsequent therapy for prostate cancer. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT54.87
Placebo + ADT21.22

[back to top]

Metastasis or Systemic Therapy

Time to either imaging indicating metastasis or beginning a new systemic therapy. This is a distinctly different measure from number 4 above. The two outcomes use different measures (biochemical as measured by PSA increase vs radiographic as measured by imaging), yielding different results in this case. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: up to 5 years (60 months)

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate60

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Undetectable PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) at 1 Year

The percentage of patients with undetectable PSA after 1 year will be calculated. Undetectable PSA is defined as a measurement of <0.1 ng/mL. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone+Radiotherapy+ADT54.54

[back to top]

PSA Nadir Value

The lowest PSA value from the start of study therapy. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 1 year, 2 years

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Year 1Year 2
Abiraterone+Radiotherapy+ADT0.030.03

[back to top]

PSA < 1.5ng/ml in Setting of Non-castrate Testosterone

Percentage of men with 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 year PSA < 1.5ng/ml in setting of non-castrate testosterone. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years
Abiraterone+Radiotherapy+ADT10010090.9190.9190.91

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Progression-free Survival (BPFS)

Disease progression defined as Phoenix RTOG definition of nadir PSA + 2ng/ml or initiation of salvage therapy not imaging. The two outcomes use different measures (biochemical as measured by PSA increase vs radiographic as measured by imaging), yielding different results in this case. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 36 and 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
36 months48 months
Abiraterone Acetate96.9696.96

[back to top]

Time to PSA Nadir

The median time in months to the lowest PSA value from the start of study therapy. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone+Radiotherapy+ADT8.9

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery

Time to testosterone recovery (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate9.2

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability

The number of patients experiencing an adverse event of at least grade 3 that is possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy per CTCAE version 4.0. (NCT01717053)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone+Radiotherapy+ADT12

[back to top]

Number of Reported Dose Limiting Toxicities When Combining BEZ235 With Abiraterone Acetate (Phase I).

(NCT01717898)
Timeframe: Beginning of study up to 15 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I: BEZ235 200 mg3
Phase I: BEZ235 300 mg0
Phase I: BEZ235 400 mg0
Phase II0

[back to top]

Anti-tumor Responses as Defined by a Decline in PSA of > 50%

Anti-tumor responses as defined by a decline in PSA of > 50% following 12 weeks of therapy to the combination of Abiraterone Acetate plus BEZ-235 occur in a cohort of patients who have received prior therapy with Abiraterone Acetate therapy (NCT01717898)
Timeframe: From day 1 of therapy initiation up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I: BEZ235 200 mg0
Phase I: BEZ235 300 mg0
Phase I: BEZ235 400 mg0
Phase II0

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose for BEZ235 + Abiraterone Acetate (Phase I).

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for BEZ235 + Abiraterone Acetate (to be determined during Phase I). The MTD of BEZ235 will be the dose when given in combination results in less than 33% dose limiting toxicities (DLT). (NCT01717898)
Timeframe: Beginning of study up to 15 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I: BEZ235 200 mg0
Phase I: BEZ235 300 mg0
Phase I: BEZ235 400 mg0
Phase II0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ≥ 30% Change in PSA

The primary objective of this study is to determine a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA of ≥ 30%) in AA patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with Abiraterone. The primary endpoint is the percent change in PSA from baseline to 12 weeks. A decline of ≥ 30% will be correlated with germline SNPs. (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate9

[back to top]

Response Assessment

Post-treatment changes in measurable disease by RECIST - Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRSD
Abiraterone Acetate91

[back to top]

Safety of Abiraterone

To determine the safety of abiraterone Adverse events as defined by CTCAE v4. Number of participants with serious adverse events grade 4 or 5 (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

defined as an undetectable PSA (using a routine non-ultrasensitive PSA assay) with non-castrate level of testosterone (>150 ng/dL) at 18 months from the time of treatment initiation (PSA0). (NCT01751451)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage change of PSA (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate5.1
Abiraterone Acetate and Degarelix17.1
Degarelix11.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival at 3 months. (NCT01845792)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cabazitaxel With Abiraterone Acetate5
Cabazitaxel Alone2

[back to top]

PSA Response

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) decline by 50% or more from baseline. (NCT01845792)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cabazitaxel With Abiraterone Acetate4
Cabazitaxel Alone0

[back to top]

Phase I: Frequency of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Alisertib, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.1

Summarized with descriptive statistics. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a PSA Value Equal to or Greater Than 25%

Compared between the two patient subsets using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison of CTC counts between baseline and at progression for those who have progressed will be carried out using either a paired t test or the nonparameteric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Worst Pain

"BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Worst pain item has a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 indicating No pain and 10 indicating Pain as bad as you can imagine. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed." (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of main study treatment period [MSTP])

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID1.6
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD2.2
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID2.5
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD1.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time interval from the date of randomization to the date of the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression as defined in the protocol-specific Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group 2 (PSAWG2) criteria during the main study treatment period. PCWG2 defines PSA progression as the date that a 25 percent (%) or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) or more from the nadir is documented, which is confirmed by a second value obtained 3 or more weeks later. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Up to 156 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID10.38
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD10.22
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID4.83
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD18.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire Score

FACT-P is a 39-item participant rated questionnaire which consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), social/family well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), emotional well-being (6 items; score range 0-24), functional well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), prostate-specific concerns (12 items; score range 0-48). Each item rated on 0 to 4 Likert type scale, then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as global quality of life (QoL) score that ranges from 0 to 156. Higher scores represent better QoL. Additional Concerns subscale has 12 items, each with a score 0-6 making a total subscale range 0-72 (higher scores are better). Missing data imputed as per FACT-P Ver4 scoring system (sum of item scores*number of items in subscale/number of items answered). (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP)

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Physical Well-BeingSocial/Family Well-BeingEmotional Well-BeingFunctional Well-BeingGlobal ScoreAdditional Concerns
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD-1.04-1.97-0.02-2.95-5.77-0.72
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID-2.46-0.78-1.66-2.67-10.39-3.96
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID-0.98-0.01-1.46-1.13-4.73-1.29
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD-2.200.61-0.89-2.19-6.62-2.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Interference Subscale

BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Pain Interference Index is the mean of the scores for the 7 items of the BPI-SF; range is 0=Does not interfere to 10=Completely interferes. LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID0.89
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD1.76
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID1.52
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD1.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Intensity Subscale

BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Pain Severity Index is the mean of the 4 pain scores (worst, least, average, and right now) on the BPI-SF; range is 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; A higher score indicates greater pain severity. LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID1.31
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD1.37
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID1.80
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): EQ-VAS

EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID-4.5
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD-5.0
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID-6.6
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Index Score

"EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed." (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID-0.0694
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD-0.0638
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID-0.0728
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD-0.0359

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. RECIST criteria for CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions , any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 millimetre [mm] short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Up to 4.9 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID42.1
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD38.9
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID60.0
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD56.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Up to 156 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID34.07
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD48.43
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID27.96
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD42.81

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Neither of the 2 Mineralocorticoid Excess Toxicity During the First 24 Weeks of Treatment

No mineralocorticoid excess is defined as experiencing neither of the 2 mineralocorticoid excess toxicities, that is, neither hypokalemia nor hypertension. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID70.6
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD36.8
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID60.0
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD70.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate [Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Decline From Baseline] at Week 12

The PSA response is defined as a >= 50% decline from baseline according to the adapted Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria. For a PSA response to be confirmed, an additional PSA measurement obtained 4 or more weeks later has to show >=50% decline from baseline. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID57.1
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD70.6
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID47.2
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD79.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: Time from randomization to one of following: radiographic progression (RP), clinical progression (CP) or death. RP- per PCWG2 criteria and modified RECIST as time from randomization to one of following: 1) considered to have progressed by bone scan if: a) first scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline at <12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by second scan >=6 weeks later with >=2 additional new lesions, b) first scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline at >=12 weeks from randomization and new lesions on next bone scan >=6 weeks later; 2) Progression of soft tissue lesions per modified RECIST; CP: cancer pain requiring initiation of chronic use of opiate analgesia (oral use for >=3 weeks; parenteral use for >=7 days), Or immediate need to initiate cytotoxic chemotherapy or either radiation therapy or surgical intervention for complications due to tumor progression, even in absence of RP, Or deterioration in ECOG performance status to grade 3 or above. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Up to 4.9 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BID16.16
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QD12.68
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BID8.51
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QD21.22

[back to top]

Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by 1 Point

Time to deterioration in ECOG Performance Status, the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date in which at least one point change (worsening) in the ECOG is observed during the main study treatment period. The ECOG performance status is a grade scale to measure quality of life (QoL). Scores run from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 denoting death. (NCT01867710)
Timeframe: Up to 156 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg BIDNA
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 5 mg QDNA
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Prednisone 2.5 mg BIDNA
Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg QD + Dexamethasone 0.5 mg QDNA

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent of Subjects Experiencing Hypertension

Incidence and grade of hypertension in the two populations. (Grade 1: Systolic BP 120 to 139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80 to 89 mmHg, Grade 2: Systolic BP 140 to 159 mmHg or diastolic BP 90 to 99 mmHg, Grade 3: Systolic BP ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All gradesGrades 3 and 4
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men2312
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men208

[back to top]

Number of Men With PSA Decline to < 0.1 and < 0.2 ng/ml

Number of men who achieve a PSA decline to < 0.1 and < 0.2 ng/ml (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PSA decline to < 0.1PSA decline to < 0.2
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men913
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men45

[back to top]

Change in PSA Response

Percent of men with Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) declines > 30%, > 50% and > 90% (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 2 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percent of men with PSA declines > 30%Percent of men with PSA declines > 50%Percent of men with PSA declines > 90%
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men827448
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men786638

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Length of patient's life after starting study (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men35.7
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men35.9

[back to top]

Median Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression as defined by PCWG 2 criteria is the date that a 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir is documented, which is confirmed by a second value obtained 3 or more weeks later. (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men11.5
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men16.6

[back to top]

Median Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria, or to death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median rPFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT01940276)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: White Men16.8
Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone: African American Men16.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins

The difference in the rate of positive surgical margins between the two groups will be descriptively summarized. (NCT01946165)
Timeframe: For both groups, tumor samples collected at baseline and during surgery.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Abiraterone + Enzalutamide + LHRHa + Prednisone9
Group B: Abiraterone + LHRHa + Prednisone2

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Pathologic Stage Less Than or Equal to ypT2N0

The proportion of participants with pathologic stage less than or equal to ypT2N0 will be descriptively summarized and compared between the two treatment arms. The proportion will be calculated as the number of patients with less than or equal to ypT2N0 in each treatment arm divided by the total number of patients who underwent surgery in the same arm. (NCT01946165)
Timeframe: For all participants who underwent surgery, from start of treatment until surgery is completed

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Abiraterone + Enzalutamide + LHRHa + Prednisone.13
Group B: Abiraterone + LHRHa + Prednisone11

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability

Number of Participants with Adverse Events (NCT01994590)
Timeframe: Participants are followed while actively taking study drug and for at least 30 days post last dose.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Functional Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for functional well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 28 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg20.2-1.0-1.2-1.3-1.2-1.0-2.4-2.0-1.5-2.1-2.0-2.1-1.6-1.4-0.8-1.20.2-0.6-1.6-1.5-1.51.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Functional Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for functional well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 28 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg20.3-0.7-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.3-0.2-0.70.20.8-0.31.51.32.02.91.72.34.02.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Emotional Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for emotional well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 24 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg18.1-0.1-0.1-0.20.30.3-0.50.1-0.70.1-0.50.00.1-0.4-0.3-0.9-0.51.00.11.5-1.5-3.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) was defined as 1) Percentage of participants with confirmed best overall complete response (CR) and partial response (PR); 2) Percentage of participants with CR, PR and stable disease (SD) for target lesions or non-progressive disease for non-target lesions. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions, including target and non-target lymph nodes reduction to <10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. No new lesions and disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR: >= 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR or PR, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 21.3 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + PRCR + PR + SD
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg0.068.4
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg5.057.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Emotional Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for emotional well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 24 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg18.50.10.20.40.10.30.30.90.91.41.21.31.21.61.12.91.5-5.02.0

[back to top]

Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time from date of randomization to the date of first confirmed PSA progression as per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2). For participant's whose PSA decreased at Week 13 after randomization, progression was defined as 25 percent (%) PSA increase relative to nadir or absolute increase of >=2 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) above nadir. Progression was confirmed if another assessment measured at least 3 weeks later met the criterion as well. For participant's whose PSA did not decrease at Week 13 after randomization, progression was defined as 25% PSA increase relative to baseline assessed 12 weeks after baseline. Participants who were not known to have had a PFS event at the analysis date were censored at last PSA assessment date prior to data cutoff date. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, last tumor assessment without disease progression, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 11.1 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg2.8
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg2.8

[back to top]

Time to First Use of New Antineoplastic Therapy for Prostate Cancer

It was defined as time from randomization to the date of first use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. For participants who had not started subsequent antineoplastic therapy as of data analysis cutoff date, the time to first use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy was censored at the date of last assessment. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization until date of first use of any antineoplastic therapy (after last dose date of Period 2, maximum up to 22.3 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg10.3
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg8.6

[back to top]

Time to Degradation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score

Time to degradation of FACT-P was defined as the time from randomization to first assessment with at least a 10-point decrease from baseline in the global FACT-P score for each participant. The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 with higher scores representing better quality of life. Participants with no score degradation at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last assessment showing no degradation. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization up to maximum of 18.4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg4.6
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg6.4

[back to top]

Rate of Pain Progression

Rate of pain progression was defined as percentage of participants with an increase of >=30% from baseline in the mean Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) pain intensity item scores of 4 items assessing average, worst, least, and intermediate pain severity. BPI-SF is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions of a participant. BPI-sf includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-sf score range for each item was from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain. Total score was reported as average of individual questions ranges from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicated less pain or less pain interference. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg36.2
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg27.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS = time from randomization to first documentation of radiographic progression (RP),unequivocal clinical progression or death due to any cause (death within 112 days of treatment discontinuation without objective evidence of RP),whichever occurred first as per investigator. Unequivocal disease progression was pain requiring chronic administration of analgesics, decline of prostate cancer of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score to 3 or higher or initiation of new anticancer therapy/radiation therapy or surgical intervention due to tumor progression. ECOG score range= 0(no severity) to 5(maximum severity).RP for bone disease was evaluated by appearance of 2 or more new bone lesions as per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) or for soft tissue disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. Participants with no PFS event at analysis date were censored at last tumor assessment date prior to data cutoff date. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, last tumor assessment without disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 20.3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg5.7
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg5.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Death

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Outcome of an AE was response to a question answered by the investigator: 'Is the AE leading to study discontinuation or death?' as 'yes'. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new antitumor treatment, whichever occurred first (maximum of 99.4 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide 160 mg5.9
Enzalutamide Crossing Over to Abiraterone + Prednisone0
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg3.2
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57 (n =17, 13)Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg116.4-3.3-4.4-3.7-2.5-3.1-6.8-5.9-6.1-5.7-6.0-4.2-4.8-4.3-5.5-7.0-3.5-0.7-4.010.8-5.5-2.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Outcome of an AE was response to a question answered by the investigator: 'Is the AE leading to study discontinuation or death?' as 'yes'. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new antitumor treatment, whichever occurred first (maximum of 99.4 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Drug Discontinuation with Enzalutamide or PlaceboDrug Discontinuation with AbirateroneDrug Discontinuation with Prednisone
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg23.223.216.0
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg11.312.912.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57 (n =17, 13)Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg119.0-2.2-0.5-2.3-2.7-2.10.3-0.20.91.3-2.61.81.80.10.61.94.4-35.06.5

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

PSA response rate was defined as percentage of participants with >=30% and >=50% decrease in PSA from baseline at randomization to the maximal PSA response with a threshold of 30% and 50% respectively. PSA response was confirmed if another assessment measured at least 3 weeks later met the criterion as well. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, last tumor assessment without disease progression, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 11.1 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
>= 50%>= 30%
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg0.82.4
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg2.52.5

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose of study drug that were absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new antitumor treatment, whichever occurred first (maximum of 99.4 months)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Enzalutamide 160 mg93.532.0
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg91.237.6
Enzalutamide Crossing Over to Abiraterone + Prednisone10030.8
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg92.729.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Outcome of an AE was response to a question answered by the investigator: 'Is the AE leading to study discontinuation or death?' as 'yes'. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new antitumor treatment, whichever occurred first (maximum of 99.4 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Drug Discontinuation with AbirateroneDrug Discontinuation with Prednisone
Enzalutamide Crossing Over to Abiraterone + Prednisone7.77.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Outcome of an AE was response to a question answered by the investigator: 'Is the AE leading to study discontinuation or death?' as 'yes'. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new antitumor treatment, whichever occurred first (maximum of 99.4 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Drug Discontinuation with Enzalutamide or Placebo
Enzalutamide 160 mg11.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Social/Family Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for social/family well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 32 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg22.1-0.5-0.4-0.1-0.50.1-0.1-0.2-0.8-1.4-0.9-0.6-1.0-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.4-0.6-0.96.2-1.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Social/Family Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for social/family well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 32 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg22.4-0.8-0.4-0.6-1.2-1.0-0.20.00.8-0.1-0.80.00.40.2-0.2-0.5-0.5-1.0-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Prostate Cancer Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for prostate cancer domain is from 0 (worst response) to 48 (best response), where higher score indicated better quality of life with fewer symptoms. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg33.2-0.7-1.9-1.0-0.4-0.8-1.3-1.4-1.5-1.0-0.8-0.8-1.1-0.5-2.1-2.0-1.5-0.2-1.03.1-0.50.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Prostate Cancer Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for prostate cancer domain is from 0 (worst response) to 48 (best response), where higher score indicated better quality of life with fewer symptoms. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg34.2-0.9-0.1-1.4-0.6-0.8-0.3-0.6-0.8-0.7-1.7-0.9-1.8-3.3-3.1-2.61.1-6.4-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Physical Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for physical well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 28 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77Change at Week 81Change at Week 85Change at Week 89
Enzalutamide 160mg+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg22.9-0.8-1.0-1.1-0.8-1.7-2.5-2.5-1.8-1.5-2.0-0.9-0.2-0.4-0.8-1.9-0.3-0.3-0.71.5-1.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Physical Well-Being Domain Scores

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain. Total subscale score range for physical well-being domain is from 0 (worst response) to 28 (best response), where higher score indicate better quality of life. (NCT01995513)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 9Change at Week 13Change at Week 17Change at Week 21Change at Week 25Change at Week 29Change at Week 33Change at Week 37Change at Week 41Change at Week 45Change at Week 49Change at Week 53Change at Week 57Change at Week 61Change at Week 65Change at Week 69Change at Week 73Change at Week 77
Placebo+Abiraterone 1000mg+ Prednisone 10mg23.60.10.0-0.3-0.8-0.40.30.10.40.4-0.40.60.70.40.40.4-0.5-3.04.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Toxicities That Required the Addition of Prednisone to Manage Symptoms of Persistent or Severe Mineralocorticoid Excess

Patients requiring prednisone to manage toxicities such as COU-302 any grade or COU-301 grade 3-4 hypertension, hypokalemia and edema per CTCAE v. 4.0 were summarized using frequency and percentage. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: Patients were on abiraterone acetate up to 57 months and toxicities of mineralocorticoid excess were monitored each cycle (1cycle = 28 days).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any grade mineralocorticoid toxicitiesAny grade hypertensionAny grade hypokalemiaAny grade edemaGrade 3-4 mineralocorticoid toxicitiesGrade 3-4 hypertensionGrade 3-4 hypokalemiaGrade 3-4 edema
Abiraterone Acetate3828151112940

[back to top]

Percent Changes in Serum Concentrations of Androgen (Including Testosterone, DHT and Androgen Precursors) Between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.

Change in corticosterone level between cycle 2 and cycle 1 was summarized by whether patients initiated prednisone for hypertension and hypokalemia. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Androstenedione change among patients without prednisoneAndrostenedione change among patients with prednisoneAndrosterone change among patients without prednisoneAndrosterone change among patients with prednisoneCorticosterone change among patients without prednisoneCorticosterone change among patients with prednisoneCortisol change among patients without prednisoneCortisol change among patients with prednisoneDHEA change among patients without prednisoneDHEA change among patients with prednisoneDHT change among patients without prednisoneDHT change among patients with prednisone11 Deoxycorticosterone change among patients without prednisone11 Deoxycorticosterone change among patients with prednisone11 Deoxycortisol change among patients without prednisone11 Deoxycortisol % change among patients with prednisone17 Hydroxypregnenolone % change among patients without prednisone17 Hydroxypregnenolone % change among patients with prednisone17 Hydroxyprogesterone change among patients without prednisone17 Hydroxyprogesterone change among patients with prednisonePregnenolone change among patients without prednisonePregnenolone change among patients with prednisoneProgesterone change among patients without prednisoneProgesterone change among patients with prednisoneTestosterone change among patients without prednisoneTestosterone change among patients with prednisone
Abiraterone Acetate-0.97-0.97-0.91-0.8742.751.7-0.58-0.73-0.98-0.99-0.37-0.2940.347.8-0.61-0.71000.020.0619.023.496.3104.60.070.07

[back to top]

Changes in Serum Concentrations of Corticosteroid Intermediates Between the First and Second Assessment Visits.

Percent change in corticosterone level between the first visit and the second visit was summarized by whether patients initiated prednisone for hypertension and hypokalemia. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionPercentage (Median)
Patients without prednisonePatients with prednisone
Abiraterone Acetate58116

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Changes in Serum Concentrations of ACTH Between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.

Changes in serum concentrations of ACTH at second assessment referent to the value at the first visit were summarized descriptively. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring the Addition of Prednisone to Manage Symptoms of Severe Fatigue.

Participants initiated treatment with prednisone for ≥grade 3 fatigue were summarized using frequency and percentage. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: Patients were on abiraterone acetate up to 57 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate1

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Progressed With Measurable Disease at Pre-study Among Those Who Were Added of Prednisone to AA at Time of PSA Progression on AA Monotherapy.

Radiographic response of measurable disease is defined using RECIST v 1.1 for soft-tissue and visceral disease and PCWG2 for bone disease. Due to small number patients, patients who experienced progressive disease were summarized using frequency and time to progression using Kaplan-Meier method was not calculated. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: Imaging was performed every 12 weeks up to 23 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Received AA Monotherapy and Progressed With Measurable Disease at Pre-study

Radiographic disease progression is defined using RECIST v 1.1 for soft-tissue and visceral disease and PCWG2 for bone disease (2 or more new lesions on bone scan and for the first 12-week assessment, defining disease progression requires a confirmatory scan performed 6 or more weeks later which shows a minimum of 2 additional new lesions). (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: Imaging was performed every 12 weeks up to 23 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate5

[back to top]

PSA Response and Its Duration to AA Monotherapy.

PSA response was defined per PCWG2 criteria (PSA reduction of ≥50%) and duration of PSA response is defined as time from PSA response to PSA progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: PSA was measured every cycle (up to 25 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate3

[back to top]

PSA Response and Its Duration to Addition of Prednisone to AA at Time of PSA Progression on AA Monotherapy.

Among those who initiated prednisone due to PSA progression, duration of PSA response was calculated as time from PSA response (PSA reduction ≥50%) to PSA progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT02025010)
Timeframe: PSA was measured every cycle (up to 25 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate5

[back to top]

Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the first SSE on or following the randomization date or death, whichever occurred first (about 32.39 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)11.93
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide19.91

[back to top]

Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal Event

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the first SSE on or following the randomization date (about 30.82 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)NA
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to Radiological Bone Progression

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of radiological bone progression (about 30.82 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)11.5
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to Radiological Progression

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of radiological disease progression (about 30.82months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)4.40
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

[back to top]

Patient Bone Scan Response Rate

Radiological bone scan response based on change from baseline of digitized technetium-99 bone scans using computer-aided detection software. Responder (R): 30% or greater resolution of the BSLA compared to baseline. Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting the criteria for R, PD, or UE. Progressive Disease (PD): Two or more new areas of radiotracer uptake attributable to metastatic disease in regions of bone that had not previously shown radiotracer uptake or greater than 30% increase from baseline in BSLA attributable to metastatic disease. Unable to Evaluate (UE): Assigned if bone scan results cannot be interpreted due to inconsistent image acquisition parameters compared to the reference scan, incomplete imaging, or other similar technical deficiencies. (NCT02034552)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

,,
InterventionPercentage (Number)
Responder (R)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Missing
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)22.2027.850.0
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision57.921.15.315.8
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide50.018.812.518.8

[back to top]

Radiological Progression Free Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From randomization to radiological disease progression or death from any cause (about 30.82 months )

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)4.40
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of death due to any cause (about 42.94 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)35.81
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision37.55
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide29.86

[back to top]

Bone Scan Lesion Area

Bone scan lesion area was defined as the sum of the pixel areas (cm2) of the set of the whole body technetium-99 bone scan imaging pixels identified as bone lesion. (NCT02034552)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

Interventioncm^2 (Mean)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)30227.13
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision10185.58
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide17321.45

[back to top]

Disease Response as Defined by RECIST 1.1 (Soft Tissue Lesions) and PCWG2 Criteria (Bone Lesions)

Number of participants with complete or partial response post-BAT as defined by RECIST 1.1 (for soft tissue lesions) and PCWG2 criteria (for bone disease), or return to castration-only post-BAT. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide6
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone2
Cohort C: Castration Only4
Cohort D: Mutation0

[back to top]

PSA Progression on Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate or Castrate Levels Post-BAT

Time to PSA progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate or return to castrate levels of testosterone post-BAT, defined as the time from the date of re-initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate or castration-only therapy to the date of the PSA measurement when it shows an increase by ≥25% above the nadir value that occurred following re-initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate or castration-only therapy and confirmed by a repeat PSA 4 weeks later (PCWG2). (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide5.5
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone3.7
Cohort C: Castration OnlyNA

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants who experience adverse events, as defined by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide30
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone29
Cohort C: Castration Only29
Cohort D: Mutation7

[back to top]

PSA Progression on BAT (Bipolar Androgen Therapy )

Time to PSA progression on BAT. Time to PSA progression on BAT is defined as the time from the date of initial dose of Testosterone to the date of the PSA measurement when it shows an ≥25% increase above the nadir value and confirmed by a repeat PSA 4 weeks later (PCWG2 criteria) during the treatment with BAT. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide3.3
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone3.2
Cohort C: Castration Only0.93
Cohort D: Mutation3

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by IIEF

International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) is a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction, with a total score range of 5-25, with the lowest score indicating a higher degree of dysfunction. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineBAT C1D85
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide824.13
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone7.3324.94
Cohort C: Castration Only12.5622.44

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by RANDSF-36

RAND 36-Item Short Form (RANDSF-36) assesses physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, general health perceptions, and perceived change in health with a total score range of 0-100. The total score from all of the questions answered is divided by the total number of the questions answered yielding a global score from 0-100, with a higher score reflecting a better QoL. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCycle 1 Day 85
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide72.2371.76
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone64.3673.97
Cohort C: Castration Only69.7273.40

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by FACIT-F Score

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) assesses Fatigue with a total score range of 0-52, with a higher score reflecting better QoL. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCycle 1 Day 85
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide13.2810.64
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone16.8613.85
Cohort C: Castration Only1311.55

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by PANAS

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a self-report measure that is made up of two mood scales, one measuring positive affect and the other measuring negative affect, with a total score range from 10-50 with a higher score on the positive scale indicating greater levels of positive affect and a lower score on the negative scale indicating less of a negative affect. (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineBAT C1D85
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide46.1545.1
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone4845.22
Cohort C: Castration Only41.2444.48

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response to Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT)

Number of participants with ≥50% PSA reduction from pre-BAT baseline level (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide9
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone5
Cohort C: Castration Only4
Cohort D: Mutation2

[back to top]

PSA Response to Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Post Bipolar Androgen Therapy

Number of participants with ≥50% PSA reduction after enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate post-BAT from baseline (NCT02090114)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A:Post-enzalutamide15
Cohort B: Post-abiraterone3
Cohort D: Mutation2

[back to top]

Radiologic Assessment Mean Number of Bone Lesions Before and After the Treatment

[Not Specified] (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT), approximately 32 weeks from Baseline

InterventionLesions (Mean)
BaselineEOT
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone11.65.6

[back to top]

Safety Data Was Analyzed and Summarized in Subjects Who Receive at Least One Infusion of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride. Number of Adverse Events Are Being Reported.

All adverse events relevant to advanced mCRPC subjects as well as adverse events of interest for both Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone and Radium Ra 223 dichloride will be reported. (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Subjects were evaluated at the screening visit, monthly during the study, and 30 days after the last dose of Radium Ra 223 dichloride, which will be approximately 32 weeks after the screening visit of evaluable subjects.

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Overall Adverse EventsGrade I or II Adverse EventsTreatment Related Adverse Events
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone18617970

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) in Pain (Between Baseline and End of Treatment)

"Improvement in Bone Pain was assessed using the Bone Pain Inventory (BPI)~Pain Severity: Pain severity is the composite of scores of worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain now. CMI criteria: Decrease >30% at two consecutive visits in Pain Severity Score in 24 hours without an increase in analgesic use.~Pain interference: Pain interference is the composite scores on general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships with others, sleep and enjoyment of life. CMI criteria: Decrease by 1.25 points or more compared with baseline at two consecutive visits.~Transient Pain Flare: Based on the work of Atkinson et al, a transient pain flare was assessed by pain at its worst in 24 hours. CMI criteria: > 2 points on the BPI-SF Worst Pain scale and subsequent reduction after initiation of Ra-223 and during the first 3 cycles." (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Subjects were evaluated at the screening visit, monthly during the study, and 30 days after the last dose of Radium Ra 223 dichloride, which will be approximately 32 weeks after the screening visit of evaluable subjects.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pain SeverityPain InterferenceTransient Pain Flare
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone18122

[back to top]

Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Before and After Treatment

[Not specified] (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT), approximately 32 weeks from Baseline

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
ALP (Baseline)ALP (EOT)PSA (Baseline)PSA (EOT)
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone26111087137

[back to top]

Bone Imaging Response (Number of Participants With Progression and Stable Disease)

Bone imaging response was assessed at baseline and at EOT visit. Progression was defined as two or more additional lesions in comparison to the baseline. (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT), approximately 32 weeks from Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseaseProgression
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone292

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement (Between Baseline and End of Treatment) in Quality-of-Life Determined by the Minimum Increase From Baseline in Scores as Per the QOL CMI Criteria

"Following Quality of Life questionnaires were given at each visit:~FACT-P assesses symptoms/problems related to prostate carcinoma and its treatment. It is a combination of the FACT- General + the PCS (Range 1-156, higher scores better).~The FACT-General (FACT-G) is a 28 item QOL measure that provides a total score as well as subscale scores: Physical (0-28), Functional (0-28), Social (0-28), Emotional (0-24) Well-being, and Satisfaction with Treatment was not assessed for this study (The total range was between 1-108, higher scores better)~FACT-TOI is derived from the sum of the Physical Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Prostate Cancer subscale scores; a sensitive measure of patient-reported health (Range 1-104, higher scores better)~PCS is a 12-item prostate cancer subscale that asks about symptoms and problems specific to prostate cancer (Range 0-48, higher scores better)." (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Subjects were evaluated at the screening visit, monthly during the study, and 30 days after the last dose of Radium Ra 223 dichloride, which will be approximately 32 weeks after the screening visit of evaluable subjects.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FACT-P Total ScaleFACT-G Total ScaleTreatment Outcome Index (FACT-TOI)Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS)Physical Well-beingFunctional Well-beingEmotional Well-beingSocial Well-being
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone2018182519171815

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Determination of measurable disease progression or response was based on modified RECIST criteria. Reported is the number of participants with either a partial or complete response, and who had radiological extraskeletal progression. (NCT02097303)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT), approximately 32 weeks from Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial or complete responseProgression
Radium 223 With Concomitant Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone48

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who will receive study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly. (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with AEsParticipants with SAEs
Abiraterone Acetate4511

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) - Pain Severity Score

The BPI-SF is a publicly available instrument to assess the pain and includes severity and interference scores. BPI-SF is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions of a participant. Pain severity score is a mean value for BPI-SF questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 (questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 [no pain] to 10 [pain as bad as you can imagine]). Pain severity progression was defined as an increase in score of 30% or greater from baseline without decrease in analgesic use. (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate19.44

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) - Pain Interference Score

The BPI-SF is a publicly available instrument to assess the pain and includes severity and interference scores. BPI-SF is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions of a participant. Pain interference score is mean value for the 7 BPI-SF questions (questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain) where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Pain interference progression was defined as an increase in score of 50% or greater from baseline without decrease in analgesic use. (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate15.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

The PSA response according to Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group 3 criteria was defined as at least 50% decrease in PSA level from Baseline. (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Week 12 to any time up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate57.50

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from date of the first dose of abiraterone acetate to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die until the time of analysis, survival time was censored at the time of last contact alive. (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate29.6

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was calculated from date of enrollment to the date of first documentation of PSA progression. As per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) criteria, PSA progression was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 25 percent (%) and >=2 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) after 12 weeks (in case of no decline in PSA from Baseline), or first PSA increase that is >=25% and >=2 ng/mL above the nadir, and which was confirmed by a second value 3 or more weeks later (in case of decline of PSA from Baseline). (NCT02217566)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate7.3

[back to top]

Time to Chronic Opioid Use

Time to chronic opioid use was defined as the time from date of randomization to the first date of opioid use. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone53.26
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone46.98

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone34.23
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone36.11

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression

"Time to pain progression: time from randomization to first date that participant either experienced an increase by 2 points from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain intensity item (item 3) or Case Report Form (CRF) pain, observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=4 wks apart, or initiation of chronic opioids as defined in time to chronic opioid use, whichever occurred first. BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. Item 3(worst pain intensity) asks participants to rate worst pain in prior 7-days on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates No pain and 10 indicates Pain as bad as you can imagine. A lower score is better.CRF pain refers to participant's response to global pain assessment How would you rate your pain over the past 7 days?with a scale of 0(No pain) to 10(Pain as bad as you can imagine),that is systematically reported and recorded on the eCRF." (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone26.51
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone21.82

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone33.71
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone36.17

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

The rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the occurrence of one of the following: 1) a participant was considered to have progressed by bone scan if - a) the first bone scan with greater than or equal to (>=) 2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and was confirmed by a second bone scan taken >=6 weeks later showing >=2 additional new lesions (a total of >=4 new lesions compared to baseline), b) the first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in >=12 weeks from randomization and the new lesions were verified on the next bone scan >=6 weeks later (a total of >=2 new lesions compared to baseline); 2) progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years and 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone16.59
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone23.98

[back to top]

Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)

RCB was analyzed using radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue. The largest area of tumor was measured by ruler and the longest tumor dimension in this area was used as the dimension for calculation. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

Interventioncm (Median)
ARM 10.03
ARM 20.05

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) or Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

pCR is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. MRD is defined as the largest cross-sectional dimension of residual tumor measuring NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ARM 130
ARM 216

[back to top]

Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

pCR is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ARM 15
ARM 22

[back to top]

Median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

PSA nadir is the lowest PSA level recorded during neoadjuvant therapy. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: PSA was assessed at baseline and every cycle during neoadjuvant therapy (up to 24 weeks).

Interventionng/mL (Median)
ARM 10.03
ARM 20.02

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive, or at the cut-off date whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel13.6
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide11.0

[back to top]

Number of Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSE)

SSE was defined as occurrence of a new symptomatic pathological fracture, use of external beam radiation to relieve bone pain, occurrence of spinal cord compression or tumor- related orthopedic surgical intervention. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until occurrence of first SSE or data cut-off, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionevents (Number)
Cabazitaxel24
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide35

[back to top]

Duration of Tumor Response

Duration of tumor response was defined as the time (in months) from date of first response (CR or PR) until date of first documentation of tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first. As per RECIST 1.1 CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From the date of the first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel6.5
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide8.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Single Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment

EQ-5D was a standardized HRQOL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels (no problem, some problems & severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS scale ranging from 0-100, where 0=worst imaginable health state and 100=best imaginable health state, where higher states indicated better outcomes. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5, Cycle 6, Cycle 7, Cycle 8 and at End of Treatment (any time up to: 141 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2: VASCycle 3: VASCycle 4: VASCycle 5: VASCycle 6: VASCycle 7: VASCycle 8: VASEnd of treatment: VASCycle 2: Utility Index ScoreCycle 3: Utility Index ScoreCycle 4: Utility Index ScoreCycle 5: Utility Index ScoreCycle 6: Utility Index ScoreCycle 7: Utility Index ScoreCycle 8: Utility Index ScoreEnd of treatment: Utility Index Score
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide0.91.5-1.13.2-1.5-0.21.2-5.9-0.010-0.011-0.002-0.035-0.0000.024-0.014-0.079
Cabazitaxel3.64.54.60.6-1.32.92.8-3.30.0260.0410.0510.0270.0150.0290.008-0.048

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented pain progression. Pain progression, in participants with no pain or stable pain at Baseline was defined as increase of >=30% from baseline in the BPI-SF pain intensity score observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=3 weeks apart without decrease in analgesic usage score or increase in analgesic usage score (calculated from analgesic use data, with non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points) >=30%. The BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain on a 0-10 categorical scale where 0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until pain progression or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CabazitaxelNA
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide8.5

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)

Radiographic progression-free survival: time (in months) from randomization to occurrence of any one of following: radiological tumor progressions using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), progression of bone lesions using Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria or occurrence of death due to any cause. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >= 2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by a second bone scan performed >=6 weeks; first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed >=12 weeks from randomization. In accordance with protocol, data cut-off date for final analysis of this endpoint was the date when 196 rPFS events had occurred. Analysis done by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel8.0
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide3.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS:time duration (in months) from date of randomization to date of first occurrence of any of following events: radiological tumor progression (RECIST 1.1); progression of bone lesions (PCWG2); symptomatic progression (developing urinary or bowel symptoms; need to change anti-cancer therapy), pain progression or death due to any cause. Tumor Progression(RECIST 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesion (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline and confirmed by second bone scan performed >=6 weeks later; pain progression: increase by >=30% from Baseline in pain intensity score (calculated using scale ranged from 0=no pain to 5=extreme pain) or increase in analgesic usage score >=30% (calculated from analgesic use data, non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points). Analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, pain progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel4.4
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response was defined as >= 50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PSA response, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel36.3
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response

Overall objective tumor response was defined as having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel36.5
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide11.5

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) in Participants With Presence and Absence of Biomarker

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts were considered as biomarker in a liquid biopsy. rPFS in participants with presence and absence of subtypes of CTC biomarker i.e. chromosomal instability (CIN) and neuroendocrine (NE) was reported in this outcome measure. rPFS was defined as: time (in months) from randomization to the first occurrence of any one of following: radiological tumor progressions (RECIST1.1), progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria) or death due to any cause. Progression (RECIST1.1): at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >= 2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed <12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by a second bone scan performed >=6 weeks later; first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed >=12 weeks from randomization and new lesions were verified on next bone scan >= 6 weeks later. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Presence of CINAbsence of CINPresence of NEAbsence of NE
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide4.23.43.93.5
Cabazitaxel4.28.53.08.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Response Assessed Using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Intensity Score

Pain response as per BPI-SF was defined as a decrease of at least 30% from Baseline in the average of BPI-SF pain intensity score observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=3 weeks apart without increase in analgesic usage score (calculated from analgesic use data, with non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points). The BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain on a 0-10 categorical scale where 0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Response assessed using BPI-SF Pain Intensity Score were reported. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until pain progression, first further anticancer therapy, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel45.9
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide19.3

[back to top]

Time to Symptomatic Skeletal Event

Time to SSE was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of occurrence of the first SSE. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first SSE, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CabazitaxelNA
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide16.7

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression (TTPP)

TTPP was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented PSA progression. PSA progression (as per PCWG 2) was defined as: 1) If decline from Baseline value: an increase of >=25% (at least 2 ng/mL) over the nadir value, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart; 2) If no decline from Baseline value: an increase of >=25% (at least 2 ng/mL) over the baseline value after 12 weeks of treatment, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart. Analysis performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From time from randomization until PSA progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel6.3
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide2.1

[back to top]

AUC (0-24 hr)

Blood samples for pre-dose PK profiling were to be collected approximately 45 minutes before dosing, i.e., within 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing. Post-dose blood samples were to be collected throughout the day at the times (15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2.0 hr 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 9 hr, 24 hr). (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing and over 24 Hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)870.859
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)626.066

[back to top]

Cmax

Blood samples for pre-dose PK profiling were to be collected approximately 45 minutes before dosing, i.e., within 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing. Post-dose blood samples were to be collected throughout the day at the times (15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2.0 hr 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 9 hr, 24 hr). (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing and over 24 Hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)268.261
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)111.316

[back to top]

Testosterone Levels

Blood Sample tested for Serum Testosterone Levels (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: Average of Day 9 and 10

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)1.02
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)1.05

[back to top]

Percent of Subjects With PSA-50 Response

"Proportion of patients with complete suppression of PSA-50 were reported by treatment and compared for between-group differences.~These were assessed only at the said Outcome Measure Time Frame. No additional time points to the said endpoint." (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84

,
Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)66.763.668.4
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)70.465.472.0

[back to top]

PSA Levels

"All patients randomized to one of the two treatment groups, round about level of PSA.~These were assessed only at the said Outcome Measure Time Frame. No additional time points to the said endpoint" (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84

,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)22.3725.2926.46
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)37.540.8433.88

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone Levels

These were assessed only at the said Outcome Measure Time Frame. No additional time points to the said endpoint. (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)1.012.561
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)1.011.011

[back to top]

Steady State Trough Concentration of Arbiraterone

These were assessed only at the said Outcome Measure Time Frame. No additional time points to the said endpoint. (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: Day 09, Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84

,
Interventionng/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 09Day 28Day 56Day 84
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)27.25918.66218.70713.819
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)20.93856.72129.97818.263

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf)

Steady state systemic exposure parameters (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing and over 24 Hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)1020.218
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)326.458

[back to top]

AUC (0-t)

Blood samples for pre-dose PK profiling were to be collected approximately 45 minutes before dosing, i.e., within 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing. Post-dose blood samples were to be collected throughout the day at the times (15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2.0 hr 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 9 hr, 24 hr). (NCT02737332)
Timeframe: 60 to 30 minutes prior to dosing and over 24 Hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Zytiga® (Abiraterone Acetate)870.859
SoluMatrix™ (Abiraterone Acetate)626.066

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate as Assessed From Prostatectomy Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment

Pathologic complete response is defined as no evidence of cancer on fully submitted prostatectomy specimens using standard surgical pathology assessments (i.e. H&E assessment will be used for the purpose of defining pathologic complete response per protocol) at 3 months. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Will will report the number of participants alive at 2-years following enrollment. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)20

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Pathologic T3 Disease After 3 Months of Treatment.

The presence of T3 disease (e.g. extraprostatic tumor not invading adjacent structures) will be determine from the prostatectomy specimen after 3 months of treament. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)18

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Near Pathologic Complete Response After 3 Months of Treatment

The near pathologic complete response will be defined as =< 5 mm of residual tumor as assessed on prostatectomy specimens after 3 months of treatment. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Without Biochemical Failure at 2 Years

Prostate-specific antigen progression (i.e. biochemical failure) will be defined per the American Urological Association guidelines (i.e. confirmed prostate-specific antigen post-radical prostatectomy >= 0.2 ng/mL). We will report the number of patients without biochemical failure at 2 years. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)18

[back to top]

Number of Patients With no Nodal Metastases After 3 Months of Treatment.

The presence of tumor cells within surgically excised lymph nodes will be assessed after 3 months of treament. (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: At 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No nodal metastasesNodal metastases
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)137

[back to top]

The Proportion of Men Who Receive Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

Patients that received radiation following prostatetomy (NCT02849990)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post prostatectomy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy)7

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 12-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 12-months post-RP

,
Interventionscore on 0-100 scale (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9175951668
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9174942686

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 2 Years Post RP [Part 2]

2-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 2 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 2-year mark are censored at date of last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 2 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)90
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)80

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 3 Years Post RP [Part 2]

3-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 3 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 3-year mark are censored at date last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 3 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)81
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)72

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 4 Years Post RP [Part 2]

4-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 4 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 4-year mark are censored at date of last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 4 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)67
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)61

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 4-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 4-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 4-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 4-years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)78
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)67

[back to top]

Frequency of Positive Surgical Margins at RP (Part 1)

Pathologic specimens were centrally reviewed and counted for positive surgical margins at the time of Radical Prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)4
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)7

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Cribriform at RP (Part 1)

Presence or cribriform was evaluated by central pathology review of specimens at radical prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Intra-operative Complications Following RP (Part 1)

Intra-operative complications were collected via questionnaire following Radical Prostatectomy. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed post-RP, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Intraductal Carcinoma at RP (Part 1)

Intraductal carcinoma was evaluated by central pathology review of specimens at Radical Prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)15
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)19

[back to top]

Median of Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) at RP (Part 1)

"RCB was calculated as tumor volume (cm^3) X % cellularity. RCB was analyzed as a continuous score (with median and range) instead of a categorical variable based on the percentile cutoff point, at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP)." (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

Intervention(cm^3) * % (Median)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0.023
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0.075

[back to top]

Combined pCR or MRD Rate [Part 1]

Pathological response, defined as achieving either pCR or MRD at radical prostatectomy (RP). Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the RP specimen. MRD will be defined as residual tumor in the RP specimen measuring ≤ 5 mm. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)12
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)12

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 3-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 3-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 3-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 3 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)83
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)72

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 2-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 2-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 2-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 2-years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)90
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)80

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL Prior to RP (Part 1)

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was measured on day 1 of each cycle during the neoadjuvant therapy. PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value prior to Radical Prostatectomy (RP). Number and percent of participants with nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL were reported. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed on day 1 of each cycle (1 cycle=28 +/- 2 days), up to 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)55
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)58

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 6-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 6-months post-RP

,
InterventionScore on 0-100 (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9063951768
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9272961483

[back to top]

Rate of pCR at RP (Part 1)

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the RP specimen at radical prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)7
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)6

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 24-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 24-months post-RP

,
Interventionscore on 0-100 scale (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9275953188
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9376972690

[back to top]

Testosterone Levels

Change in serum testosterone levels from baseline (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: Baseline and 360 days

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa-6.24
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga-5.87

[back to top]

Testosterone Complete Suppression

Proportion of subjects with complete suppression of testosterone levels (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: 360 days

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa100
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga87.5

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen Levels

Change in serum testosterone levels after one year of treatment against baseline (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa-60.12
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga-112.76

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Disease Progression

Number of participants who had disease progression (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: one year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa1
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Adverse events (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: one year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa8
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen - 50 Response

A decrease of ≥50% reduction from baseline of the study CHL-AA-201 (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: 360 days

Interventionpercentage of number of subjects (Number)
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa60.0
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga55.6

[back to top]

PSA Response in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

Confirmed PSA response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in PSA from baseline on at least two assessments conducted at least 3 weeks apart. PSA response is calculated for all participants with PSA values at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. PSA is assessed by a local laboratory. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rucaparib41.9
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel26.7

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

"The primary efficacy endpoint for the study is rPFSirr, defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic progression, or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first).~Radiographic disease progression includes confirmed soft tissue disease progression and confirmed bone disease progression as per modified RECIST Version 1.1 (at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of one or more new extra-skeletal lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions) or PCWG3 criteria Progression by bone is determined by PCWG3 criteria in which at least two new lesions appearing during the first 12-week flare window followed by 2 additional new lesions in the confirmatory scan appearing after the 12-week flare window, or after the 12-week flare window, at least 2 new lesions relative to the first post-treatment scan confirmed on a subsequent scan)." (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib11.2
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel6.4

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

"The primary efficacy endpoint for the study is rPFSirr, defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic progression, or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first).~Radiographic disease progression includes confirmed soft tissue disease progression and confirmed bone disease progression as per modified RECIST Version 1.1 (at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of one or more new extra-skeletal lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions) or PCWG3 criteria (Progression by bone is determined by PCWG3 criteria in which at least two new lesions appearing during the first 12-week flare window followed by 2 additional new lesions in the confirmatory scan appearing after the 12-week flare window, or after the 12-week flare window, at least 2 new lesions relative to the first post-treatment scan confirmed on a subsequent scan)." (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib10.2
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel6.4

[back to top]

Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

Time to PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date that a ≥ 25% increase and absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA) in PSA was measured. The increase must be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment conducted at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib6.6
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel3.8

[back to top]

Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

Time to PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date that a ≥ 25% increase and absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA) in PSA was measured. The increase must be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment conducted at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib5.7
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel3.6

[back to top]

Trough Plasma PK (Cmin) of Rucaparib Based on Sparse Sampling

Mean trough PK plasma concentration over time in the safety population with at least one PK sample collected at timepoints week 5, 9, 13 and 17; only Week 5 data presented. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to week 5 of dosing

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Rucaparib1310

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: BPI-SF

Changes in health and pain status from baseline to week 25 using: Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire (on a scale of 1 to 10, from mild to severe, for pain and pain-interference scores). A decrease indicates less severe pain/interference. Assessments completed during screening, at study treatment visits (Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, and every 29 days thereafter) (during the Treatment Phase, the Treatment Discontinuation Visit, and during the Follow-up Phase. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to up to approximately 25 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BPI-SF Pain ScoreBPI-SF Interference Score
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel0.140.65
Rucaparib-0.32-0.28

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by IRR at 6 Months in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

Defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) according to modified RECIST Version 1.1 with no progression in bone per PCWG3 criteria. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rucaparib63.0
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel22.7

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: EQ-5D-5L

Changes in health and pain status from baseline to week 25 using: EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS; on a scale from 100 to 0, from best to worst health status). The greater the increase in score (including more negative) from baseline to week 25 the greater the increase in health status. Assessments completed during screening, at study treatment visits (Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, and every 29 days thereafter) during the Treatment Phase, the Treatment Discontinuation Visit, and during the Follow-up Phase. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to up to approximately 25 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Rucaparib2.4
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel1.8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

"ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best response of Complete response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) in participants with measurable disease at study entry. Modified RECIST Version 1.1 criteria is used to determine ORR (ie, CR or PR by IRR assessment and no progression in bone per PCWG3 by IRR assessment).~CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters." (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rucaparib37
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

"ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best response of Complete response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) in participants with measurable disease at study entry. Modified RECIST Version 1.1 criteria is used to determine ORR (ie, CR or PR by IRR assessment and no progression in bone per PCWG3 by IRR assessment).~CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters." (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rucaparib37
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel7

[back to top]

Interim Overall Survival in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

Overall survival time is calculated as the time from randomization to death (by any cause) +1 day. Participants who have not died will be censored on the date the participants was last known to be alive. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib23.6
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel20.9

[back to top]

Interim Overall Survival in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

Overall survival time is calculated as the time from randomization to death (by any cause) +1 day. Participants who have not died will be censored on the date the participant was last known to be alive. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib24.3
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel20.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

DOR is defined as the time from the first confirmed response (CR or PR by modified RECIST Version 1.1 in participants with nodal or visceral ± nodal disease) until the first date that Progressive Disease (PD) (using the same criteria) is documented. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib7.4
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel7.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) by IRR in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

DOR is defined as the time from the first confirmed response (CR or PR by modified RECIST Version 1.1 in participants with nodal or visceral ± nodal disease) until the first date that Progressive Disease (PD) (using the same criteria) is documented. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (Total follow-up was up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rucaparib7.4
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel7.4

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by IRR at 6 Months in Participants With a BRCA or ATM Alteration Combined

Defined as the percentage of participants with a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), and Stable Disease (SD), according to Modified RECIST Version 1.1 with no progression in bone per PCWG3 Criteria. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rucaparib57.6
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel25.4

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) in Participants With a BRCA Alteration: FACT-P

Changes in health and pain status from baseline to week 25 using: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire (FACT-P total score, on a scale of 0 to 156 where a higher score is better quality of life). The greater the decrease in score (ie more negative) from baseline to week 25 the greater the decrease in health status. Assessments completed during screening, at study treatment visits (Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, and every 29 days thereafter) (during the Treatment Phase, the Treatment Discontinuation Visit, and during the Follow-up Phase. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to up to approximately 25 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Rucaparib-0.8
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel-3.9

[back to top]

PSA Response in Participants With a BRCA Alteration

Confirmed PSA response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in PSA from baseline on at least two assessments conducted at least 3 weeks apart. PSA response is calculated for all participants with PSA values at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. PSA is assessed by a local laboratory. (NCT02975934)
Timeframe: From enrollment to primary completion of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rucaparib54.7
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide or Docetaxel26.7

[back to top]

Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) - Cohort A Only

The time from randomisation until the date of objective radiological disease progression (determined by RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG-3) (bone)) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomised therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression is defined using (i) Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for soft tissue, as a >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of >=5mm taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters; (ii) Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PGWG-3) for bone as >= 2 new bone lesions on the 1st week 8 scan compared to baseline. The confirmatory scan, >=6 weeks later, must show >=2 more new bone lesions (for a total of >=4 new bone lesions since baseline). (NCT02987543)
Timeframe: Tumor assessments every 8 weeks from randomisation until radiographic progression assessed by BICR (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A Olaparib 300mg bd7.39
Cohort A Investigators Choice of NHA3.55

[back to top]

Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) - Cohort A+B

The time from randomisation until the date of objective radiological disease progression (by RECIST 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PGWG-3)) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomised therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. (NCT02987543)
Timeframe: Tumor assessments every 8 weeks from randomisation until radiographic progression assessed by BICR (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A Olaparib 300mg bd5.82
Cohort A Investigators Choice of NHA3.52

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression - Cohort A Only

Time from randomisation to time point at which worsening in pain is observed (ie date of pain progression - date of randomisation + 1). Based on average Brief Pain Inventory - short form (BPI-SF) worst pain [Item 3] and Analgesic Quantification Algorithm [AQA] score. (NCT02987543)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks from randomisation (for 7 consecutive days) throughout the study (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A Olaparib 300mg bdNA
Cohort A Investigators Choice of NHA9.92

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence

To investigate the time from an undetectable Prostate-specific antigen (≤0.2 ng/mL) until the Prostate-specific antigen is >0.2 over two time-points. (NCT03043807)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMonth (Median)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy After ProstatectomyNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Adverse Events

Will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Incidence of serious adverse events and 95% confidence interval will be provided overall as well as for each major affected organ category. (NCT03279250)
Timeframe: From screening up to 4 weeks post-surgery, an average of 7 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SeriousNon Serious
Arm A (LHRHa, Apalutamide)134
Arm B (LHRHa, Apalutamide, Abiraterone Acetate)234

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Rate of Pathologic Stage =< pT2N0 at Prostatectomy

The study will provide a point estimate and 95% confidence interval of the proportion of patients with pathologic stage =< pT2N0 at prostatectomy for each arm. Patient characteristics will be summarized using descriptive statistics for each arm. (NCT03279250)
Timeframe: At the time of radical prostatectomy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (LHRHa, Apalutamide)13
Arm B (LHRHa, Apalutamide, Abiraterone Acetate)12

[back to top]

Combination 1: Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade >=3 Severity

AE was defined as an any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study subject administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An assessment of severity grade was made using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) as Grade 1 (mild): awareness of symptoms that are easily tolerated, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; Grade 2 (moderate): sufficient discomfort is present to cause interference with normal activity; Grade 3 (severe): extreme distress, causing significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation, prevents normal everyday activities; Grade 4 (Life-threatening): urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 (death). (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 37 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1A: BM+: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg14
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1B: BM-: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg8

[back to top]

Combination 1: Part 1: Number of Participants With Specified Toxicity

Number of participants with specified toxicity during Cycle 1 was reported. Only toxicities that occurred during safety evaluation period(defined as first 28 days of treatment-Cycle 1 of Part 1) was used for analysis of specified toxicities and for dose reduction decisions. Toxicities were graded for severity as per NCI-CTCAE, version 4.03. Safety evaluation criteria were: Any Grade(G) >=3 non-hematological toxicity without anorexia, or constipation, fatigue improved to G<=2 in <7 days, vomiting and diarrhea resolved in <=3 days, laboratory abnormalities with hospitalization, tumor flare improved to G<=2 in <=7 days, elevation in AST/ALT for <=7 days and G3 hypertension controlled by medical therapy; any treatment-related(TR)G4 or G>=3 thrombocytopenia required platelet transfusion; Any TR G4 neutropenia >=7 days or G3 or 4 neutropenia with infection/fever >38.5 degrees Celsius; Any TR SAE or intolerable toxicity. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination 1: Part 1 (Dose Seletion): Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 240 mg0
Combination 1: Part 1 (Dose Selection): Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg0

[back to top]

Combination 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve for Niraparib From Time Zero to 168 Hours (AUC [0-168 Hours]/Dose) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose

AUC0(168 hours)/dose was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve for niraparib from time 0 to 168 hours of niraparib administered with AA after a single dose. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 30 min, 1 hour (hr), 1.5 hr, 2hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, and 168 hr post dose on Day 1

Interventionnanogram*hour/milliliter/milligram (Mean)
Combination 3: Cohort 1A: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, SA73.36
Combination 3: Cohort 1B: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC1-RS (G010)59.31
Combination 3: Cohort 2: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC2-RS (G012)66.61

[back to top]

Combination 1: Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AE was defined as an any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study subject administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 37 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1A: BM+: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg21
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1B: BM-: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg11

[back to top]

Combination 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Niraparib Normalized by the Dose(Niraparib) (Cmax/Dose) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose

Cmax/dose of niraparib was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration of niraparib Cmax normalized by the dose of niraparib administered with AA after a single dose. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 30 min, 1 hour (hr), 1.5 hr, 2hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, and 168 hr post dose on Day 1

Interventionnanograms per milliliter per milligram (Mean)
Combination 3: Cohort 1A: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, SA2.14
Combination 3: Cohort 1B: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC1-RS (G010)1.99
Combination 3: Cohort 2: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC2-RS (G012)2.09

[back to top]

Combination 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate After a Single Dose

Cmax is defined as maximum observed plasma concentration of niraparib and abiraterone acetate (AA) after a single dose. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 30 min, 1 hour (hr), 1.5 hr, 2hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, and 168 hr post dose on Day 1

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Combination 3: Cohort 1A: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, SA428
Combination 3: Cohort 1B: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC1-RS (G010)398
Combination 3: Cohort 2: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC2-RS (G012)417

[back to top]

Combination 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 168 Hours (AUC [0-168hr]) of Niraparib Administered With AA After a Single Dose

AUC(0-168 hours) was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 168 hours of Niraparib administered with AA After a single dose. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 30 min, 1 hour (hr), 1.5 hr, 2hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, and 168 hr post dose on Day 1

InterventionNanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
Combination 3: Cohort 1A: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, SA14672
Combination 3: Cohort 1B: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC1-RS (G010)11862
Combination 3: Cohort 2: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate, FDC2-RS (G012)13321

[back to top]

Combination 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade >=3 Severity

AE was defined as an any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study subject administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An assessment of severity grade was made using the NCI-CTCAE as Grade 1 (mild): awareness of symptoms that are easily tolerated, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; Grade 2 (moderate): sufficient discomfort is present to cause interference with normal activity; Grade 3 (severe): extreme distress, causing significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation, prevents normal everyday activities; Grade 4 (Life-threatening): urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 (death). (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 31 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination 2: Cohort 2A: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone6
Combination 2: Cohort 2C: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone7
Combination 2: Cohort 2D: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone4
Combination 2: Cohort 2C: HRR Negative: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone1

[back to top]

Combination 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AE was defined as an any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study subject administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 31 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination 2: Cohort 2A: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone8
Combination 2: Cohort 2C: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone9
Combination 2: Cohort 2D: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone5
Combination 2: Cohort 2C: HRR Negative: Niraparib + Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone1

[back to top]

Combination 2: Composite Response Rate (RR)

Composite response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had a composite response which is defined as one of the following PCWG3 criteria: Objective response (percentage of participants with measurable disease who achieved a best response of either CR or PR as assessed by RECIST 1.1 with no evidence of bone progression according to PCWG3 criteria) (confirmed per RECIST 1.1), or; circulating tumor cells (CTC) response: defined as CTC=0 per 7.5 milliliters (mL) of blood at 8 weeks for participants who had CTC greater than or equal to (>=) 1 at baseline or CTC less than (<) 5 per 7.5 mL with CTC >=5 at baseline, confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 4 or more weeks later, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declined of >=50 percentage (%), measured twice 3 to 4 weeks apart. This outcome measure was analyzed for specified arms only as pre-planned in the protocol. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 31 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combination 2: Cohort 2A: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone75.0
Combination 2: Cohort 2C: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone55.6
Combination 2: Cohort 2D: Niraparib+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone33.3

[back to top]

Combination 1: Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR of soft tissue (visceral or nodal disease) was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease who achieved a best response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with no evidence of bone progression according to prostate cancer working group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. (NCT03431350)
Timeframe: Up to 37 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1A: BM+: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg23.8
Combination 1: Part 2 (Dose Expansion): Cohort 1B: BM-: Niraparib 200 mg + Cetrelimab 480 mg9.1

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Will be assessed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Safety and tolerability as evaluated by the incidence, severity, duration, causality, seriousness of adverse events. Toxicities will be summarized as the number of patients with grade 3 or higher toxicities per CTCAE v4.0, in addition to total number of toxicities (allowing for multiple toxicities within a patient) among all patients, and per treatment arm. (NCT03649841)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (ADT, Abiraterone, Prednisone)2
Arm II (ADT, Abiraterone, Prednisone, Radiation Therapy)0

[back to top]

Rate of Undetectable Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) (< 0.2)

The number of patients with undetectable PSA at 6-months will be summarized by each arm and all combined. (NCT03649841)
Timeframe: At 6 months after start of abiraterone acetate

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (ADT, Abiraterone, Prednisone)1
Arm II (ADT, Abiraterone, Prednisone, Radiation Therapy)1

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Prostate Cancer (FACT-P)

"Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P) total score and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score.~Total FACT-P score is the sum of Physical Well-being (PWB), Social Well-being (SWB), Emotional Well-being (EWB), Functional Well-being (FWB) and Prostate cancer subscale (PCS). FACT-P total score change from baseline values can be a minimum of -156 and a maximum of 156. A positive value indicates improvement.~FACT-G total score is the sum of PWB, SWB, EWB and FWB. FACT-G Total score change from baseline values can be a minimum of -108 and a maximum of 108. A positive value indicates improvement." (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

,
InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline in FACT-P TotalChange from baseline in FACT-G Total
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd-5.84-5.06
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd-5.30-4.35

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS) Event by Investigator Assessment

"An rPFS event is defined as progression determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1] and/or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 [PCWG-3] or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomised therapy or receives another anticancer therapy prior to progression.~Per RECIST v1.1, progression is defined as the sum of TLs has a 20% and absolute ≥ 5mm increase from nadir, and/or unequivocal progression in any non target lesions, and/or any new lesion identified.~Per PCWG3, progression on a bone scan is defined as 2 or more new lesions observed from the first visit after baseline compared to baseline, or from all other visits compared to first visit after baseline. A confirmatory scan is required." (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO1): 30Jul2021 (Approx. 2 years 9 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd168
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd226

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Second Progression or Death (PFS2) Event

An event for PFS2 is defined as the second progression on next-line anticancer therapy or death, whichever occurs earlier. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd103
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd126

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Subsequent Anticancer Therapy or Death (TFST) Event

A TFST (excluding radiotherapy) event is defined as the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of randomised treatment or death from any cause. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd255
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd285

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to Pain Progression (TTPP) Event

A TTPP event is defined as pain progression based on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Item 3 (range 0-10, a higher score indicates worse pain) and opiate analgesic use (Analgesic quantification algorithm [AQA] score, range 0-7, a higher score indicates increased opioid use). For patients who are asymptomatic at baseline (average worst pain score of 0 and not taking opioids): A ≥2 point change from baseline in average (4-7 days) worst pain score observed at 2 consecutive visits or initiation of opioid use; For patients who are symptomatic at baseline (average worst pain score >0 and/or receiving opioids): A ≥2 point change from baseline in average (4-7 days) worst pain score observed at 2 consecutive visits and an average worst pain score ≥4, and no decrease in average opioid use (≥1-point decrease in AQA score from a starting value of ≥2), or increase in opioid use (≥1-point increase, or ≥2-point increase if the starting value is 0) at 2 consecutive follow-up visits. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd68
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd60

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)

The BPI-SF is a validated, 15-item domain-specific instrument designed to assess the severity of pain and the impact/interference of pain on daily functions. BPI-SF worst pain, pain severity and pain interference score changes can be a minimum of -10 and a maximum of 10. A negative change from baseline value indicates improvement. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

,
InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline in BPI-SF worst painChange from baseline in BPI-SF pain severity scoreChange from baseline in BPI-SF pain interference score
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd-0.09-0.080.01
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd0.03-0.020.13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Opiate Use

An event for opiate use is defined as the first opiate use for cancer related pain. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd58
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Event

An OS event is defined as death by any cause, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomised therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. (NCT03732820)
Timeframe: Assessed from date of randomisation to data cut off (DCO3): 12Oct2022 (Approx. 3 years 11 months). DCO3 is the final data cut-off for the OS analysis and therefore no further updates will be made.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaparib 300 mg bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd176
Placebo bd + Abiraterone 1000 mg qd205

[back to top]

Cohort 1: Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)

As per BICR, rPFS is time interval from the date of randomization to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurs first. Radiographic progression was determined by: 1) progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1; 2) Progression of bone lesions observed by bone scan based on prostate cancer working group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. PCWG3 criteria: bone progression was confirmed by subsequent scan greater than or equal to (>=) 6 weeks later. Week 8 scan was baseline to which all subsequent scans were compared to determine progression. Confirmatory scan >=2 new lesions indicate progression; scan does not show >= 2 new lesions means no progression. If Week 8 scan less than (<) 2 new bone lesions compared to baseline, the initial scan >=2 new lesions compared to Week 8 scan indicates progression if confirmed by subsequent scan >=6 weeks later. (NCT03748641)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort 1: Niraparib 200 mg + Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg + Prednisone 10 mg16.46
Cohort 1: Placebo + Abiraterone Acetate 1000 mg + Prednisone 10 mg13.70

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life - FACT/GOG-NTX

Quality of Life questionnaires will be done every 3 months while participants are on treatment. The scale used will be the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-Neurotoxicity (NTX) (FACT/GOG-NTX) scale (version 4). FACT/GOG-NTX total score ranges from 0 to 152, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. (NCT03827473)
Timeframe: Planned for up to 18 months, but actual was 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Baseline ScoreMonth 3 Score
Arm A (ADT, Docetaxel)131.83126

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life - PROMIS Fatigue

Quality of Life questionnaires will be done every 3 months while participants are on treatment. The scale used will be the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue scale. Total raw scores range from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating a higher level of fatigue. (NCT03827473)
Timeframe: Planned for up to 18 months, but actual was 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Baseline ScoreMonth 3 Score
Arm A (ADT, Docetaxel)1016

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen Progression Free Survival (PSA-PFS)

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) will be measured every three months while on study. PSA Progression Free Survival (PSA-PSF) will be reported as the number of participants who have not demonstrated PSA progression by the end of the follow-up period. PSA progression is defined by meeting the following criteria: 1) an increase in PSA of greater than or equal to 25% from baseline or nadir, AND 2) an increase in PSA of at least 2 ng/dL, AND 3) the increase is confirmed at least 3 weeks later. This analysis was planned for up to 18 months following study enrollment, but the only participant enrolled on the study was only followed for 3 months. (NCT03827473)
Timeframe: Planned up to 18 months, but actual was 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (ADT, Docetaxel)1

[back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA evaluations will occur every 3 months while on study. PSA response is defined as a reduction in PSA value of greater than or equal to 90% from baseline, reported as a count of participants who had a PSA response on the study. (NCT03827473)
Timeframe: Planned for up to 18 months, but actual was 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (ADT, Docetaxel)1

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life - FACT-P

The impact of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel on health related quality of life will be assessed every 3 months from screening to month 12 of treatment or follow-up. The scale used will be the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 156, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. The primary endpoint was intended to be quality of life at 12 months, but since no participants completed 12 months of treatment/follow-up, scores at baseline and 3 months are reported instead. (NCT03827473)
Timeframe: Planned for up to one year, but actual was 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Baseline ScoreMonth 3 Score
Arm A (ADT, Docetaxel)139.83127

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves. (NCT03834519)
Timeframe: Up to ~31 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib15.8
Next-generation Hormonal Agent Monotherapy (NHA)14.6

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1 based on BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions or ≥2 new bone lesions was also considered PD. PCWG-modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1 and PCWG rules include new bone lesions. The rPFS per PCWG-modified RECIST as assessed by BICR for all participants is presented. The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves. (NCT03834519)
Timeframe: Up to ~31 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib4.4
Next-generation Hormonal Agent Monotherapy (NHA)4.2

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

Will be assessed using version National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Will characterize AEs by type and grade. Safety will be summarized as the severity and frequency of a given AE. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: Within 14 days of end of treatment, an average of 1 year.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)3

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response is the time until a radiographic response occures as determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. This cannot be determined since only two patients had re-staging scans on study and neither had a response. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: Up to 67 days

Interventionyears (Number)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)NA

[back to top]

Radiographic Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival is time to progressive disease. Disease progression is determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue metastases and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria for bone metastases. Median progression free survival will be calculated. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: Up to 67 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)59

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Will be calculated as the percentage of patients, with 95% confidence intervals, achieving a complete response or partial response across the entire study population at any time. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: Up to 67 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)0

[back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response will be defined by a > 50% reduction in PSA compared with baseline at any point during treatment. We will report the percentage of patients who achieve a PSA response. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 73 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is time to death from any cause. Median overall survival survival will be calculated. (NCT03999515)
Timeframe: From cycle 1, day 1 to the date of death, assessed up to 178 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Erdafitinib)94

[back to top]