leuprolide and Drug-Related-Side-Effects-and-Adverse-Reactions

Hirsutism is the excessive growth of terminal hair in a typical male pattern in a female. It is often a sign of excessive androgen levels. Although many conditions can lead to hirsutism, polycystic ovary syndrome and idiopathic hyperandrogenism account for more than 85% of cases. Less common causes include idiopathic hirsutism, nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting tumors, medications, hyperprolactinemia, thyroid disorders, and Cushing syndrome. Women with an abnormal hirsutism score based on the Ferriman-Gallwey scoring system should be evaluated for elevated androgen levels. Women with rapid onset of hirsutism over a few months or signs of virilization are at high risk of having an androgen-secreting tumor. Hirsutism may be treated with pharmacologic agents and/or hair removal. Recommended pharmacologic therapies include combined oral contraceptives, finasteride, spironolactone, and topical eflornithine. Because of the length of the hair growth cycle, therapies should be tried for at least six months before switching treatments. Hair removal methods such as shaving, waxing, and plucking may be effective, but their effects are temporary. Photoepilation and electrolysis are somewhat effective for long-term hair removal but are expensive.

Topics: Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Cushing Syndrome; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Eflornithine; Female; Glucocorticoids; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hair Removal; Hirsutism; Humans; Hyperandrogenism; Hyperprolactinemia; Leuprolide; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Neoplasms; Ornithine Decarboxylase Inhibitors; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Spironolactone; Thyroid Diseases

Leuprorelin is a well known luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. The drug is effective in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and is well tolerated. This article reviews published literature (based on a search of PubMed, EMBASE and Biosis databases to the end of 2005) and other sources of data on a new formulation of leuprorelin acetate (Eligard) for use in the treatment of hormone-dependent advanced prostate cancer. This product takes advantage of a novel delivery system (Atrigel) which forms an implant in situ that is capable of delivering double doses of leuprorelin consistently to provide better, more sustained testosterone suppression compared with a microsphere leuprolide acetate formulation. Two formulations, 7.5 mg and 22.5 mg, are currently available with duration of action of 1 and 3 months, respectively. The 2-week stability at room temperature prior to mixing facilitates its use and reduces the potential for waste.. In clinical studies of the new leuprorelin acetate formulation reviewed here, all patients achieved testosterone levels < or = 50 ng/dL and up to 98% of patients showed levels comparable to those resulting from surgical bilateral orchidectomy (< or = 20 ng/dL). Both formulations showed minimal breakthroughs, defined as a rise in testosterone levels after reaching levels of 50 ng/dL. The safety profile is typical of LHRH agonists, with mild to moderately severe 'hot flushes' being the most common adverse event. The higher dose of 22.5 mg, with a volume of 0.375 mL is administered subcutaneously via a small 20G needle, causing little local discomfort.. Prostate cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older men. In the majority of cases, suppression of serum testosterone levels is very effective. The level of testosterone suppression is currently under debate, with ideal suppression levels ranging from 20 to 50 ng/dL. Not all LHRH agonist therapy achieves the same degree of testosterone suppression as bilateral orchidectomy. The new leuprorelin acetate (Eligard) appears to achieve a testosterone suppression of 20 ng/dL in 98% of patients, while maintaining a side effect profile comparable to other products in its class.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

We compared the efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month depots of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist goserelin acetate in prostate cancer patients.. Patients were randomly assigned to the Direct Group that received the goserelin 3-month depot or the Switch Group that began with the 1-month depot for the first 3 months and then switched to the 3-month depot. All patients were co-administered the antiandrogen agent bicalutamide. Serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and adverse events were recorded at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24.. Baseline testosterone levels in the Direct and Switch Groups were 4.98 and 5.07 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.798). At each week, the levels in both groups were ≤0.50 ng/mL (castration level) with no significant differences between them. All of the patients in the Switch Group and 98.1 % in the Direct Group had achieved castration levels at week 12, and 100 % had achieved such levels at week 24. Baseline PSA levels in the Direct and Switch Groups were 52.37 and 46.72 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.793). Levels in both groups dropped continuously, to about 1.0 ng/mL at week 24, with no significant differences between the groups at any time. Three patients in the Direct Group experienced adverse events that were attributed to the co-administered bicalutamide.. There was no difference in the efficacy or safety between the 1- and 3-month depots of goserelin when given as initial prostate cancer treatment in combination with bicalutamide. Patients must be monitored for adverse events associated with bicalutamide.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Middle Aged; Orchiectomy; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Flutamide; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Leuprolide; Libido; Male; Medicare; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Penis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tosyl Compounds; United States

The treatment options for high-risk prostate cancer are either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy/brachytherapy depending on the patients' prognosis. In older men with multiple comorbidities, radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy is an attractive option. Common side effects of androgen deprivation therapy include hot flushes, tiredness, increased risk of fractures, increased risk of metabolic disorders, coronary heart disease, and psychological effects. This case highlights the potential side effect of lipodystrophy secondary to leuprolide acetate injections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of such an instance.. In this case report, we describe a 70-year-old white man with prostate-specific antigen of 1.8 ng/mL, clinical stage T2bN0M0, Gleason 4+5=9 prostate cancer who developed an unusual side effect from leuprolide acetate as part of his androgen deprivation therapy. Approximately 2 months after the initial 3-monthly injection of leuprolide acetate (Eligard 22.5 mg) our patient developed abnormal lipid deposition particularly in his deltoid and abdominal region. His upper limb mobility gradually became compromised due to the size of these abnormal fat depositions. He had liposuction to correct this lipodystrophy and had a good functional outcome and cosmesis from the procedure.. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of lipodystrophy secondary to leuprolide acetate injections. Leuprolide acetate in commonly used as one of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists and thus we should be mindful of the potential effect of producing lipodystrophy, especially in patients with cirrhosis, and to watch for any signs and symptoms as appropriate. The implication of this potential side effect poses difficult management strategies for such patients, and second-line alternatives such as chemotherapy may need to be considered.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Leuprolide; Lipectomy; Lipodystrophy; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Shoulder; Treatment Outcome

Drug-induced liver injury is the most common cause of market withdrawal of pharmaceuticals, and thus, there is considerable need for better prediction models for DILI early in drug discovery. We present a study involving 223 marketed drugs (51% associated with clinical hepatotoxicity; 49% non-hepatotoxic) to assess the concordance of in vitro bioactivation data with clinical hepatotoxicity and have used these data to develop a decision tree to help reduce late-stage candidate attrition. Data to assess P450 metabolism-dependent inhibition (MDI) for all common drug-metabolizing P450 enzymes were generated for 179 of these compounds, GSH adduct data generated for 190 compounds, covalent binding data obtained for 53 compounds, and clinical dose data obtained for all compounds. Individual data for all 223 compounds are presented here and interrogated to determine what level of an alert to consider termination of a compound. The analysis showed that 76% of drugs with a daily dose of <100 mg were non-hepatotoxic (p < 0.0001). Drugs with a daily dose of ≥100 mg or with GSH adduct formation, marked P450 MDI, or covalent binding ≥200 pmol eq/mg protein tended to be hepatotoxic (∼ 65% in each case). Combining dose with each bioactivation assay increased this association significantly (80-100%, p < 0.0001). These analyses were then used to develop the decision tree and the tree tested using 196 of the compounds with sufficient data (49% hepatotoxic; 51% non-hepatotoxic). The results of these outcome analyses demonstrated the utility of the tree in selectively terminating hepatotoxic compounds early; 45% of the hepatotoxic compounds evaluated using the tree were recommended for termination before candidate selection, whereas only 10% of the non-hepatotoxic compounds were recommended for termination. An independent set of 10 GSK compounds with known clinical hepatotoxicity status were also assessed using the tree, with similar results.

Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Decision Trees; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Glutathione; Humans; Liver; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Protein Binding