leuprolide and Prostatic-Intraepithelial-Neoplasia

We studied the effect of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and assessed the effect of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on disease recurrence as measured by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA).. A total of 278 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included in phase II and III studies evaluating radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between October 1991 and August 1996. Patient data related to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were analyzed.. Of 275 evaluable patients 145 (52.7%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Of 50 patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (hormone group) 22 (44%) had a lower incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia compared to 69 of 80 controls (86.3%) (chi-square test p<0.0001). Of 262 patients (95.3%) with followup PSA 44 (16.8%) had PSA recurrence at a median followup of 32 months, with a median time to recurrence of 30 months. PSA recurrence was noted in 23 of 145 patients with compared to 21 of 130 without prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (chi-square test p = 0.95), and did not significantly differ between the hormone group (25 of 142, 17.6%) and controls (19 of 130, 14.6%) (chi-square test p = 0.45).. While patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy had significantly lower incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, neither prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia nor neoadjuvant hormonal therapy significantly affected PSA recurrence at a median followup of 32 months.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Flutamide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms

The presence and morphology of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (H-PIN) was blindly evaluated in 40 totally embedded radical prostatectomy specimens of patients with prostate cancer randomized to either a 3 (n = 18) or 6 months (n = 22) combined androgen blockade regimen before surgery. In 5 cases, neo-adjuvant therapy was abrogated some time before surgery. In the remaining cases, foci of H-PIN were identified in 72% and 59% of prostates from patients treated for 3 and 6 months, respectively. Cellular features used to distinguish H-PIN from normal glands were increased nuclear size, nuclear crowding, anisonucleosis, and disordered nuclear arrangement. In some cases, density of cytoplasm was an additional feature. Unfortunately, the molecular marker erbB2 proved unhelpful for identification of H-PIN. The median number of prostatic glands involved by H-PIN was 19 +/- 21 (SD) glands in 3 months treated prostatectomies (n = 18) and 7 +/- 12 (SD) glands in 6 months treated prostatectomies (n = 17), a nonsignificant difference (P = .17). H-PIN was localized within areas of residual carcinoma in 62% and 20%, respectively of prostatectomies of patients treated for 3 and 6 months, respectively. Architectural patterns of H-PIN differed at 3 and 6 months of endocrine pretreatment: The predominant tufted pattern at 3 months was replaced by flat H-PIN at 6 months. The continued expression of androgen receptors and the cell cycle marker MIB-1 in persistent H-PIN suggests that recovery of androgen levels after cessation of androgen blockade therapy will lead to its further expansion.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Cell Nucleus; Cohort Studies; Cytoplasm; Flutamide; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Leuprolide; Male; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cohort Studies; Flutamide; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Prognosis; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Single-Blind Method