exenatide and Nausea

GLP-1 receptor agonists (RAs) may cause nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) with GLP-1 RAs and their relation to dose, background medication and duration of action.. The PubMed database was searched and 32 clinical trials with GLP-1 RAs (phase 3) were selected. We performed a systematic analysis and compared the proportion of patients reporting nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea, for different doses and glucose-lowering background medications, and relative to a reference compound within the subclasses of short- (exenatide b.i.d.) and long-acting (liraglutide) GLP-1 RAs, calculating the relative risks ± 95% confidence intervals.. The risk of nausea was dose-dependent for long-acting (P = .0063) and across all GLP-1 RAs (P = .0017), and a similar trend was observed for vomiting (P = .23). Diarrhoea was dose-dependent (P = .031). Background treatment with metformin was associated with more nausea (P = .04) and vomiting (P = .0009). Compared to exenatide b.i.d., there was less nausea and diarrhoea with lixisenatide. Compared to liraglutide, there was a similar risk associated with dulaglutide, and less with exenatide q.w. and albiglutide. Long-acting GLP-1 RAs were associated with less nausea and vomiting, but with more diarrhoea than short-acting agents.. GLP-1 RAs are associated with gastrointestinal AEs that are related to dose and background medications (especially metformin) and may vary in a compound-specific manner. Long-acting agents are associated with less nausea and vomiting but with more diarrhoea.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Metformin; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

Exenatide once weekly is the first glucose-lowering agent available to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) which is administered once per week. This long-acting formulation contains the same active ingredient as exenatide twice daily, except that the exenatide is encapsulated in dissolvable microspheres. Following subcutaneous injection, exenatide once weekly microspheres remain in place under the skin and slowly degrade, releasing active exenatide continuously into circulation. In randomized clinical trials, exenatide once weekly was associated with significant glycaemic improvement and moderate weight loss in patients with T2DM when administered as monotherapy or in combination with a variety of oral antidiabetic agents. Exenatide once weekly also lowered blood glucose more effectively than titrated basal insulin in patients on metformin or metformin plus sulphonylurea background therapy. Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were the most common tolerability issues associated with exenatide once weekly administration, but they occurred at lower rates than in patients on other glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (i.e., exenatide twice daily or liraglutide). Issues regarding the place of exenatide once weekly in T2DM pharmacotherapy are discussed.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a disease of epidemic proportion associated with significant morbidity and excess mortality. Optimal glucose control reduces the risk of microvascular and possibly macrovascular complications due to diabetes. However, glycemic control is rarely optimal and several therapeutic interventions for the treatment of diabetes cause hypoglycemia and weight gain; some may exacerbate cardiovascular risk. Exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) is a glucagon- like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist developed as a first-in-class diabetes therapy. This review presents an overview of the evolution of exenatide as a T2DM treatment, beginning with the seminal preclinical discoveries and continuing through to clinical pharmacology investigations and phase 3 clinical trials. In patients with T2DM, exenatide enhanced glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppressed inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion, slowed gastric emptying, and enhanced satiety. In controlled phase 3 clinical trials ranging from 12 to 52 weeks, 10-mcg exenatide twice daily (ExBID) reduced mean HbA1c by -0.8% to -1.7% as monotherapy or in combination with metformin (MET), sulfonylureas (SFU), and/or thiazolidinediones (TZD); with mean weight losses of -1.2 kg to -8.0 kg. In controlled phase 3 trials ranging from 24 to 30 weeks, a 2-mg once-weekly exenatide formulation (ExQW) reduced mean HbA1c by -1.3% to -1.9%, with mean weight reductions of -2.3 to -3.7 kg. Exenatide was generally well-tolerated. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal in nature, mild, and transient. Nausea was the most prevalent adverse event. The incidence of hypoglycemia was generally low. By building upon early observations exenatide was successfully developed into an effective diabetes therapy.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Models, Animal; Nausea; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms; Weight Loss

Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist shown to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Intermittent exenatide exposure is achieved with the twice-daily formulation (ExBID), while the once-weekly formulation (ExQW) provides continuous exenatide exposure. This integrated, retrospective analysis compared safety and tolerability of ExQW vs. ExBID in patients with T2DM.. Data were pooled from two open-label, randomized, comparator-controlled, trials directly comparing ExQW (N = 277) to ExBID (N = 268). Between-group differences in adverse event (AE) and hypoglycaemia incidences were calculated. Incidence over time and duration of selected AEs (nausea, vomiting, and injection-site-related AEs) were also summarized.. The most common AEs were nausea, diarrhoea, injection-site pruritus, and vomiting. Nausea and vomiting occurred less frequently with ExQW vs. ExBID, peaking at initiation (ExQW) or at initiation and dose escalation (ExBID), and decreasing over time. Few patients discontinued because of gastrointestinal-related AEs. Injection-site AEs were more common with ExQW but decreased over time in both groups. No major hypoglycaemia occurred; minor hypoglycaemia occurred with low incidence in patients not using concomitant sulphonylurea, with no difference between ExQW and ExBID. Serious AEs and discontinuations because of AEs were reported with similar frequency in both groups.. Both exenatide formulations were generally safe and well-tolerated, with ExQW associated with less nausea and vomiting but more injection-site AEs. Continuous vs. intermittent exposure did not impact the overall tolerability profile of exenatide, with no evidence of prolonged duration or worsened intensities of AEs with continuous exposure.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting

Patient numbers in individual diabetes trials are often too limited to assess the effect of a treatment by different patient characteristics, and meta-analyses often do not include patient-level data. The purpose of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of exenatide once weekly (EQW) in patients with type 2 diabetes grouped into subpopulations by key demographic characteristics.. This post hoc analysis included data from patients who received EQW in seven randomised, controlled phase 3 trials that were 24-30 weeks in duration. Patients were classified into subpopulations on the basis of their baseline age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), gender (male or female), race (White, Black, Asian, Hispanic), duration of diabetes (< 10 years, ≥ 10 years) and body mass index (BMI; < 25, ≥ 25 to < 30, ≥ 30 to < 35, ≥ 35 to < 40 or ≥ 40 kg/m(2)).. A total of 1719 patients were included in this analysis of patient subpopulations. All subpopulations experienced significant improvements from baseline in haemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose and body weight. Most subpopulations experienced significant improvements in blood pressure and lipid parameters. Overall, the most common AEs were hypoglycaemia (16.4% overall; 2.3% in patients not on concomitant sulfonylurea), nausea (14.7%), diarrhoea (10.9%) and nasopharyngitis (7.2%).. These results show that the treatment of type 2 diabetes with EQW for 24-30 weeks was associated with significant improvements in glycaemic control and body weight, irrespective of age, gender, race, duration of diabetes or BMI. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Nasopharyngitis; Nausea; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Dexamethasone; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Fluorouracil; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Coma; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Leucovorin; Male; Malnutrition; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Palliative Care; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms

We aimed to integrate evidence from all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and assess the impact of different doses of exenatide or liraglutide on major gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. RCTs evaluating different doses of exenatide and liraglutide against placebo or an active comparator with treatment duration ≥4 weeks were searched and reviewed. A total of 35, 32 and 28 RCTs met the selection criteria evaluated for nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, respectively. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses and mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) of all RCTs were performed.. All GLP-1 dose groups significantly increased the probability of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea relative to placebo and conventional treatment. MTC meta-analysis showed that there was 99.2% and 85.0% probability, respectively, that people with exenatide 10 μg twice daily (EX10BID) was more vulnerable to nausea and vomiting than those with other treatments. There was a 78.90% probability that liraglutide 1.2 mg once daily (LIR1.2) has a higher risk of diarrhea than other groups. A dose-dependent relationship of exenatide and liraglutide on GIAEs was observed.. Our MTC meta-analysis suggests that patients should be warned about these GIAEs in early stage of treatment by GLP-1s, especially by EX10BID and LIR1.2, to promote treatment compliance.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Odds Ratio; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Venoms; Vomiting

Although several classes of pharmacotherapy are available for type 2 diabetes, glycaemic control is often hampered by medication-related adverse effects and contraindications such as renal impairment. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists provide a new pharmacotherapeutic option based on the multiple glucose-lowering effects of the human hormone GLP-1. This mechanism of action not only provides therapeutic efficacy but also suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists have distinct safety and tolerability concerns compared with other diabetes therapies. Stimulation of pancreatic insulin secretion by GLP-1 receptor agonists is glucose dependent, conferring a lesser risk of hypoglycaemia than that seen with sulfonylureas. Individual GLP-1 receptor agonists differ in their metabolism and excretion profiles, affecting the choice of agent for patients with renal impairment. As with other protein-based therapies, GLP-1 receptor agonists may induce the formation of antibodies that may attenuate therapeutic efficacy and affect safety. Conclusions on cardiovascular safety must await outcomes studies, but at present no signal of harm has been reported, and preclinical data and effects on risk markers suggest a potential for benefit. Current data on thyroid medullary cancer in humans and pancreatic malignancy in rodents do not suggest that there is any reason to restrict the clinical use of GLP-1 analogues in most people with diabetes. It is currently difficult to ascertain the possible contributory role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in increasing the risk of pancreatitis, and vigilance for signs and symptoms is prudent. Primary tolerability issues include transient gastrointestinal symptoms, common with GLP-1 receptor agonists, which can be reduced through dose titration.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Incretins; Liraglutide; Nausea; Pancreatitis; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Thyroid Gland; Venoms; Vomiting

Several drugs that act on the incretin hormonal system are now licensed in the UK as add-on therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control. Liraglutide (Victoza--Novo Nordisk) is a recently licensed long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetic that can be given once daily as a subcutaneous injection, as part of either dual or triple therapy. Advertising claims that use of the drug leads to "reductions in weight"; "reductions in systolic blood pressure"; and "improvements in beta-cell function", as well as reductions in blood glucose concentrations. Here we assess the evidence for these claims and consider whether liraglutide has a role in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Liraglutide; Nausea; Peptides; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Venoms; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Exenatide is an incretin mimetic, while sitagliptin and vildagliptin are incretin enhancers used as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes failing oral agents. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin can also be used as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet.. To provide a critical review of clinical trials of exenatide, sitagliptin and vildagliptin.. Review of Phase III clinical trials based on Medline search published up to April 2008.. The use of exenatide is associated with reduction in average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of approximately 0.8% compared with baseline. The corresponding reduction with either sitagliptin or vildagliptin is 0.7%. The actions of incretin-based drugs predominantly target postprandial hyperglycemia. Treatment-related hypoglycemia is generally mild, and mainly occurs when used with sulfonylureas (SUs). Exenatide treatment leads to a mild weight loss of around 2 kg after 30 weeks, whereas sitagliptin and vildagliptin have generally neutral effect on weight. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin are well tolerated in trials lasting up to 52 weeks. Meanwhile, 5 - 10% of patients cannot tolerate exenatide due to adverse effects, mainly nausea and vomiting. The three drugs are limited by the lack of long-term safety and efficacy data, as well as by their high cost.. Exenatide, sitagliptin and vildagliptin are useful add-on therapy for type 2 diabetes that is suboptimally controlled on oral agents, particularly when there is concern about weight gain and hypoglycemia, or when postprandial hyperglycemia is the major cause of inadequate glycemic control. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin may be used as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate metformin or SU, and sitagliptin may be used as alternative to metformin in renal insufficiency.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Nausea; Nitriles; Peptides; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms; Vildagliptin; Vomiting

Exenatide is the first in a new class of compounds that exhibit activity similar to the naturally occurring hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Released from cells in the gut in response to food, GLP-1 binds to pancreatic beta-cell receptors to stimulate the release of insulin. Exenatide mirrors many of the effects of GLP-1, improving glycemic control through a combination of mechanisms, which include glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion, suppression of glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying, reduced appetite and enhanced beta-cell function. As stimulation of insulin secretion occurs only in the presence of elevated blood glucose concentrations, the risk of hypoglycemia should be greatly reduced with exenatide. In addition to positive therapeutic effects on fasting and postprandial glucose levels, exenatide treatment is associated with significant, dose-dependent reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and progressive reductions in body weight. Exenatide is generally well tolerated; nausea is the most commonly reported side effect, but it can be significantly reduced when a target dose of exenatide is achieved in patients with gradual dose titration. Exenatide may enable patients with type 2 diabetes to achieve glycemic control while reducing or eliminating the risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. These would represent significant therapeutic gains.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Half-Life; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms

To assess the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) and the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting on weight loss induced by semalgutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c and superior weight loss (by 2.3-6.3 kg) versus different comparators across the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials; the contributing factors to weight loss are not established.. Subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (drug-naïve or on background treatment) were randomized to subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg (excluding SUSTAIN 3), 1.0 mg (all trials), or comparator (placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide extended release or insulin glargine). Subjects were subdivided by baseline BMI and reporting (yes/no) of any nausea and/or vomiting. Change from baseline in body weight was assessed within each trial and subgroup. A mediation analysis separated weight loss into direct or indirect (mediated by nausea or vomiting) effects.. Clinically relevant weight-loss differences were observed across all BMI subgroups, with a trend towards higher absolute weight loss with higher baseline BMI. Overall, 15.2% to 24.0% and 21.5% to 27.2% of subjects experienced nausea or vomiting with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 6.0% to 14.1% with comparators. Only 0.07 to 0.5 kg of the treatment difference between semaglutide and comparators was mediated by nausea or vomiting (indirect effects).. In SUSTAIN 1 to 5, semaglutide-induced weight loss was consistently greater versus comparators, regardless of baseline BMI. The contribution of nausea or vomiting to this weight loss was minor.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Weight Loss

To explore the effects of dual therapy with dapagliflozin and exenatide on body weight, body composition, glycaemic variables and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in obese adults without diabetes.. In this single-centre, double-blind trial, we randomized 50 obese adults without diabetes (aged 18-70 years; body mass index 30-45 kg/m. Of 25 dapagliflozin/exenatide- and 25 placebo-treated participants, 23 (92.0%) and 20 (80.0%) completed 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. At baseline, the mean participant age was 52 years, 61% were female, the mean body weight was 104.6 kg, and 73.5% of participants had prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance). After 24 weeks, for dapagliflozin/exenatide versus placebo: the difference in body weight change was -4.13 kg (95% confidence interval -6.44, -1.81; P < .001), which was mostly attributable to adipose tissue reduction without lean tissue change; 36.0% versus 4.2% of participants achieved ≥5% body weight loss, respectively; and prediabetes was less frequent with active treatment (34.8% vs 85.0%, respectively; P < .01). The difference in SBP change for dapagliflozin/exenatide versus placebo was -6.7 mm Hg. As expected, nausea and injection-site reactions were more frequent with dapagliflozin/exenatide than with placebo. Only two and three participants, respectively, discontinued because of adverse events.. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin/exenatide dual therapy reduced body weight, frequency of prediabetes and SBP over 24 weeks and was well tolerated in obese adults without diabetes.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Composition; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Obesity; Peptides; Prediabetic State; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Weight Loss

To characterize gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) with different glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).. Two retrospective intention-to-treat analyses of 6-month patient-level data were conducted. Data from three studies comparing exenatide once weekly (n = 617) with exenatide twice daily (n = 606) were pooled, and one (DURATION-6) comparing exenatide once weekly (n = 461) with liraglutide (n = 450) was analysed separately. Patient-reported gastrointestinal AEs were classified as upper or lower, AE incidences and timing were determined, subgroups were analysed, and associations of gastrointestinal AEs with efficacy were examined.. Nausea was the most common gastrointestinal AE for all treatments. Fewer exenatide once-weekly-treated vs exenatide twice-daily- or liraglutide-treated patients reported gastrointestinal AEs (34% vs 45% and 25% vs 41%, respectively; both P  < .0001). Fewer exenatide once-weekly-treated patients reported upper plus lower events than liraglutide-treated patients ( P  < .001); the difference between exenatide once weekly and twice daily was not significant. Within each group, more women than men reported gastrointestinal AEs. Events occurrred early and were predominantly mild. Glycated haemoglobin reductions were similar for patients with or without gastrointestinal AEs. Weight loss was greater for patients with gastrointestinal AEs with exenatide once weekly and exenatide twice daily ( P  < .05); no difference was observed in DURATION-6.. Gastrointestinal AEs were less frequent with exenatide once weekly vs exenatide twice daily or liraglutide, and combined upper and lower events occurred less often. Gastrointestinal AEs were typically mild and occurred early. Gastrointestinal AEs did not affect glycaemic control but may be associated with greater weight loss.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Incidence; Incretins; Intention to Treat Analysis; Liraglutide; Male; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Peptides; Retrospective Studies; Self Report; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Venoms; Weight Loss

GSK2374697 is a genetically engineered fusion protein of a human domain antibody to exendin-4. This molecule binds with a high affinity to human serum albumin, creating a long-duration glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. This study is the first evaluation of the albumin-binding domain antibody (AlbudAb) drug delivery platform in humans. The aim of this randomized clinical study was to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of GSK2374697. The pharmacokinetic profile was prolonged, with estimated half-lives ranging from 6 to 10 days. Postprandial glucose and insulin were reduced, and gastric emptying was delayed in healthy subjects, confirming anticipated GLP-1 receptor agonist pharmacology. The safety and tolerability were as expected for a potent GLP-1 agonist. Gradual titration of doses greatly improved tolerability. Rapid tolerance to nausea was observed. Study results support further investigation in type 2 diabetes and for weight loss.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Aged; Antibodies; Blood Glucose; Exenatide; Female; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Protein Binding; Receptors, Glucagon; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Serum Albumin; Venoms

We explored the safety and efficacy of exenatide BID v. insulin glargine in a subgroup of Polish patients with type 2 diabetes sub-optimally controlled with metformin plus a sulfonylurea, participating in a 26-week randomised, controlled open-label trial.. In Poland, 80 patients (HbA1c 7-10%, BMI 25-45 kg/m(2)) were randomised to exenatide 10 μg BID (n = 40) or insulin glargine once daily (n = 40). We present exploratory analyses on HbA1c, glucose profiles, body weight, hypoglycaemia and adverse events (AEs).. Mean (SD) baseline HbA1c was 7.9% (0.86) for exenatide and 7.8% (1.02) for insulin glargine. At Week 26, LS mean (SEM) HbA1c decreased in both groups (exenatide -0.72% [0.12]; glargine -0.64% [0.12]), as did fasting glucose. Postprandial glucose excursions after breakfast and dinner were smaller in patients treated with exenatide. LS mean (SEM) body weight decreased by -1.9 (0.48) kg with exenatide and increased by 1.6 (0.48) kg with glargine (group difference [95%CI]: -3.5 kg [-4.9 to -2.2]). Hypoglycaemia was low in both groups; nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reported for three v. seven patients (three v. 24 episodes) in the exenatide and glargine groups, respectively. Adverse events were more common with exenatide (nausea n = 22 v. n = 1, vomiting n = 5 v. n = 0, headache n = 8 v. n = 2).. This exploratory analysis confirms that findings from the global study apply to patients treated with exenatide BID and glargine in Poland, showing that exenatide BID was as effective as insulin glargine. Data suggested that changes in HbA1c were similar, with fasting glucose changes greater in the glargine group and postprandial changes greater in the exenatide BID group. Exenatide BID was associated with weight reduction, less nocturnal hypoglycaemia, but more gastrointestinal events compared to glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Headache; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms; Vomiting

To investigate the effect of treatment with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist exenatide on weight loss and metabolic parameters in obese nondiabetic women.. Forty-one obese women (aged 48 ± 11 years and BMI 33.1 ± 4.1 kg/m(2)) participated in a 35-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, including two 16-week treatment periods separated by a 3-week washout period. There was no lifestyle intervention. The primary outcome was change in body weight.. Subjects treated with exenatide lost an average of 2.49 ± 0.66 kg compared with a 0.43 ± 0.63 kg weight gain during placebo treatment. Weight loss with exenatide treatment was noted at 2 weeks. The degree of weight loss could be stratified. A total of 30% of subjects were high responders who lost ≥5% body weight (-7.96 ± 0.52%), 39% were moderate responders who lost <5% body weight (-2.43 ± 0.45%), and 31% were nonresponders who gained weight (1.93 ± 0.53%). Waist circumference also decreased significantly with exenatide treatment. Subjects experienced more nausea during exenatide treatment compared with placebo, but the severity decreased over time and did not correlate with weight loss.. Short-term exenatide treatment was associated with modest weight loss and decreased waist circumference in a cohort of obese nondiabetic women. A subset of individuals demonstrated robust weight loss that was detected very early in the course of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Middle Aged; Nausea; Obesity; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Venoms; Waist Circumference; Weight Loss

Exenatide is an analogue of GLP1 designed to improve the glycemic control in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. It may control other metabolic processes as well. We aimed to evaluate whether exenatide helps to achieve metabolic control goals in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) after 24 weeks of treatment.. Open clinical trial in 102 obese patients, with age between 19-77 years (mean [ED] 53,2 [1,1] years), T2DM with mean evolution of 4,88 [0,5] years (range 1 to 20 years) with oral antidiabetic treatment.. There was a reduction of 19.7±7.1mg/dl in the fasting glucose average and of 0.33±0.17% in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)). These last values were higher (2.12±0.53%) in patients with bad control prior to treatment (HbA(1c)>8.5%). The desirable threshold of HbA(1c)<7% was fulfilled by 14% more treated than control patients (43.6 vs. 57.9, P<.05). Reductions of 4.4±0.8kg average weight and of 1.7±0.3kg/m(2) body mass index were recorded. Although there was not a significant reduction in the overall lipid profile, a decrease of 4.9±5.1mg/dl total cholesterol, 3.2±4.3mg/dl LDL-C, 8.6±5.6mg/dl noHDL-C and 2.5±1, 4mg/dl HDL-C was observed. Patients outside target (LDL>100 and/or triglycerides>150mg/dl) showed significant differences in their concentrations of LDL-C and triglycerides. With respect to blood pressure (BP), significant differences were observed in diastolic BP (-18.9±5.7mmHg) but not in systolic BP (P<.05).. Exenatide is an effective drug not only for glycemic control but also for the overall metabolic control of HbA(1c), lipid profile, BP and body weight.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Gastric Emptying; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Obesity; Peptides; Satiety Response; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting; Weight Loss; Young Adult

Incretin-based therapies provide additional options for treating type 2 diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.. A 26-week, metformin controlled, parallel-group study was conducted among antidiabetic drug-naive obese patients aged > 18 years, and with type 2 diabetes. Participating patients were randomly assigned to receive exenatide or metformin treatments.. Fifty-nine patients (age (50.5 ± 8.6) years, body mass index (BMI) (30.2 ± 1.6) kg/m(2), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA(1C) (8.2 ± 1.2)%) were enrolled in the study. Glucose control and weight reduction improved in both groups receiving treatment. HbA(1C) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 2 hour glycemia reduction with exenatide was superior to that obtained with metformin ((-2.10 ± 1.79)% vs. (-1.66 ± 1.38)%, (-5.11 ± 2.68) mmol/L vs. (-2.80 ± 2.70) mmol/L, P < 0.05). Fast plasma glucose (FPG) reduction was not significantly different between the two groups ((-1.8 ± 2.0) mmol/L vs. (-1.6 ± 1.7) mmol/L, P > 0.05). Patients treated with exenatide achieved HbA(1C) of < 7% (97% of patients) and < 6.5% (79%) at end-point, vs. 93% and 73% with metformin (P > 0.05). Greater weight reduction was also achieved with exenatide ((-5.80 ± 3.66) kg) than with metformin ((-3.81 ± 1.38) kg, P < 0.01). Homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-B) was not significantly increased, but the insulinogenic index and HOMA for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) were greatly improved in the exenatide group (P < 0.05). Nausea was the most common adverse effect in exenatide treatment (30% vs. 8%; P < 0.05), but most cases were of mild to moderate intensity. One case in the exenatide group was withdrawn early because of severe nausea. Hypoglycemia events were often observed during the first 4 weeks, with 12% of patients in the exenatide and 3.2% in metformin groups, respectively (P < 0.05). No incidents of severe hypoglycemia were reported.. Exenatide demonstrated more beneficial effects on HbA(1C), weight reduction and insulin resistance during 26 weeks of treatment, but there were more hypoglycemic events and mild-to-moderate nausea compared with metformin. These results suggested that exenatide monotherapy may provide a viable treatment option in newly developed type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Obesity; Peptides; Venoms; Weight Loss

Systemic fibroblast growth factor (FGF)21 levels and hepatic FGF21 production are increased in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients, suggesting FGF21 resistance. We examined the effects of exenatide on FGF21 in patients with type 2 diabetes and in a diet-induced mouse model of obesity (DIO).. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (n = 24) on diet and/or metformin were randomised (using a table of random numbers) to receive additional treatment consisting of pioglitazone 45 mg/day or combined therapy with pioglitazone (45 mg/day) and exenatide (10 μg twice daily) for 12 months in an open label parallel study at the Baylor Clinic.. Twenty-one patients completed the entire study and were included in the analysis. Pioglitazone treatment (n = 10) reduced hepatic fat as assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, despite a significant increase in body weight (Δ = 3.7 kg); plasma FGF21 levels did not change (1.9  ±  0.6 to 2.2  ±  0.6 ng/ml [mean ± SEM]). However, combined pioglitazone and exenatide therapy (n = 11) was associated with a significant reduction of FGF21 levels (2.3  ±  0.5 to 1.1  ±  0.3 ng/ml) and a greater decrease in hepatic fat. Besides weight gain observed in the pioglitazone-treated patients, lower extremity oedema was observed as a side effect in two of the ten patients. Three patients who received pioglitazone and exenatide combination therapy complained of significant nausea that was self-limiting and did not require them to leave the study. In DIO mice, exendin-4 for 4 weeks significantly reduced hepatic triacylglycerol content, decreased hepatic FGF21 protein and mRNA, and enhanced phosphorylation of hepatic AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase, although no significant difference in weight and body fat was observed. Hepatic FGF21 correlated inversely with hepatic AMPK phosphorylation. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, combined pioglitazone and exenatide therapy is associated with a reduction in plasma FGF21 levels, as well as a greater decrease in hepatic fat than that achieved with pioglitazone therapy. In DIO mice, exendin-4 treatment reduces hepatic triacylglycerol and FGF21 protein, and enhances hepatic AMPK phosphorylation, suggesting an improvement of hepatic FGF21 resistance.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 01432405.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Animals; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Exenatide; Fatty Liver; Female; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liver; Lower Extremity; Male; Metformin; Mice; Middle Aged; Nausea; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms

Transient nausea and, to a lesser extent, vomiting are common adverse effects of exenatide that can be mitigated by dose titration and usually do not result in treatment discontinuation. This retrospective analysis of data from a phase 1, open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study in healthy subjects evaluated the effect of oral anti-emetics on exenatide-associated nausea and vomiting and on the pharmacokinetics of exenatide.. A single subcutaneous dose (10 μg) of exenatide was administered to 120 healthy subjects (19-65 years, BMI 23-35 kg/m(2) ). Incidences of nausea and vomiting were compared between 60 subjects premedicated with two oral anti-emetics 30 min before the exenatide dose and 60 non-premedicated subjects. Similarly, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum observed concentration (C(max) ) of plasma exenatide concentrations over 8 h post-dose were compared.. Among all subjects [61% male, 32 ± 12 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.1 ± 3.4 kg/m(2) (mean ± sd)], mild to moderate nausea was the most frequent adverse event after exenatide dosing. Vomiting was also observed. Subjects premedicated with anti-emetics experienced significantly less nausea and vomiting (16.7 and 6.7%, respectively) vs. non-premedicated subjects (61.7 and 38.3%, respectively; P-value <0.0001 for both nausea and vomiting). The mean area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum observed concentration AUC and C(max) of plasma exenatide concentrations during 8 h post-dose were not significantly different between groups.. Administration of oral anti-emetics before a single 10-μg exenatide dose was associated with significant reductions in treatment-emergent nausea and vomiting, with no discernible effect on the pharmacokinetics of exenatide. Use of anti-emetic therapy may provide a short-term strategy to minimize the nausea and vomiting associated with exenatide treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Area Under Curve; Body Mass Index; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; United States; Venoms; Vomiting; Young Adult

To test the hypothesis that glycaemic control with exenatide added to thiazolidinediones (TZDs) with or without metformin was superior to placebo.. A 26-week, multi-country (Canada, Mexico, Romania, South Africa and the USA), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared exenatide twice-daily vs. placebo in 165 subjects suboptimally controlled with TZDs with or without metformin [HbA(1c) 8.2% (s.d. 0.9), fasting serum glucose 9.1 (2.6) mmol/l, body weight 93.9 (17.8) kg, diabetes duration 6.4 (4.3) years]. After a 2-week, single-blind, lead-in period, subjects were randomly assigned (2 : 1) to add exenatide or placebo to current regimens. The primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change at endpoint (Week 26 or last-observation-carried-forward).. Only 8 subjects were treated with concomitant TZD alone. Exenatide reduced HbA(1c) significantly more than placebo [-0.84% (s.e. 0.20) vs. -0.10% (0.23), treatment difference -0.74% (0.16), p < 0.001)]. Mean reductions in body weight were similar in both treatments at endpoint [exenatide, -1.4 (s.e. 0.6) kg vs. placebo, -0.8 (0.7) kg, p = 0.176)]. Nearly 71% of subjects had both a reduction in HbA(1c) and body weight with exenatide compared with 54% with placebo. The most common adverse events (exenatide vs. placebo) were nausea (12% vs. 2%, p = 0.037), vomiting (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.031) and headache (4% vs. 4%). Confirmed (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/l) minor hypoglycaemia was experienced by 4 and 2% of subjects treated with exenatide and placebo, respectively. Incidence of hypoglycaemia was not significantly different between groups.. Exenatide added to TZDs alone or in combination with metformin significantly improved glycaemic control as determined by significant improvement in HbA(1c) without associated hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Placebos; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting

Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist.. Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1.8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 microg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882.. Mean baseline HbA(1c) for the study population was 8.2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA(1c) significantly more than did exenatide (-1.12% [SE 0.08] vs -0.79% [0.08]; estimated treatment difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.18; p<0.0001) and more patients achieved a HbA(1c) value of less than 7% (54%vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2.02; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.11; p=0.0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1.61 mmol/L [SE 0.20] vs -0.60 mmol/L [0.20]; estimated treatment difference -1.01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.65; p<0.0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3.24 kg vs exenatide -2.87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0.448, p<0.0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1.93 vs 2.60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88; p=0.0131; 25.5%vs 33.6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode.. Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations.. Novo Nordisk A/S.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Linear Models; Liraglutide; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Weight Loss

In this single-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and safety of subcutaneous exenatide were evaluated in 40 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were allocated to 4 groups and randomized to receive exenatide (n = 8/group) or placebo (n = 2/group), with all receiving placebo on day 1. On day 2, patients received single-dose exenatide (2.5 microg [group A] or 5 microg [groups B, C, and D]) or placebo and then bid on days 3 to 5. On days 6 to 10, groups A and B continued on 2.5 and 5 microg bid; groups C and D received 10 and 15 microg bid, respectively. The last dose was given on the morning of day 10. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Exenatide was generally well tolerated up to 10 microg. Exenatide was well absorbed with a median t(max) of 1.5 hours and mean t((1/2)) of 1.6 hours; exposure increased with dose. Up to 10 microg, exenatide reduced postprandial glucose concentrations in a dose-dependent fashion compared with placebo; decreases were similar for 10 and 15 microg. An E(max) model demonstrated that doses higher than 2.5 microg were necessary for adequate glycemic response. Based on tolerability and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships, 5 and 10 microg exenatide may be considered for further clinical development in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon; Half-Life; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting

Exenatide therapy is effective in combination with metformin or sulfonylureas for treating type 2 diabetes. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) also are commonly used, but the efficacy of exenatide with a TZD has not been reported.. To compare the effects of exenatide versus placebo on glycemic control.. Placebo run-in, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from May 2004 to August 2005.. 49 sites in Canada, Spain, and the United States.. 233 (exenatide group, n = 121; placebo group, n = 112) patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with TZD treatment (with or without metformin). Mean (+/-SE) baseline glycated hemoglobin A1c level was 7.9% +/- 0.1%.. Subcutaneous abdominal injections of 10 microg of exenatide or placebo twice daily, added to a TZD (with or without metformin) for 16 weeks.. The primary outcome was change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c level. Other outcomes were fasting serum glucose level, body weight, self-monitored blood glucose level, and any adverse events.. Exenatide treatment reduced hemoglobin A(1c) level (mean difference, -0.98% [95% CI, -1.21% to -0.74%]), serum fasting glucose level (mean difference, -1.69 mmol/L [-30.5 mg/dL] [CI, -2.22 to -1.17 mmol/L {-40.0 to -21.1 mg/dL}]), and body weight (mean difference, -1.51 kg [CI, -2.15 to -0.88 kg]). Sixteen percent of patients in the exenatide group and 2% of patients in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. In the exenatide group, 40% (n = 48) of patients experienced nausea (mostly mild [n = 21] or moderate [n = 19]), 13% experienced vomiting, and 11% experienced hypoglycemia. In the placebo group, 15% of patients experienced nausea, 1% experienced vomiting, and 7% experienced hypoglycemia.. Combinations with TZDs and sulfonylureas were not tested. Trial duration was relatively short. Only 71% and 86% of patients in the exenatide and placebo groups, respectively, completed the study.. Exenatide therapy improved glycemic control, reduced body weight, and caused gastrointestinal symptoms more than placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with TZD therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00099320. For more information on exenatide click here.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Exenatide, a treatment for type 2 diabetes, slows gastric emptying as part of its pharmacologic action and may alter the absorption of concomitant oral drugs. This open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study evaluated the influence of exenatide coadministration on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a narrow therapeutic index drug, in healthy men (N = 16). A single, 25-mg oral dose of warfarin, with a standardized breakfast, was administered alone in period 1 and concomitantly with 10 microg exenatide subcutaneous twice daily in period 2. Exenatide did not produce significant changes in R- or S-warfarin pharmacokinetics. Although there were minor reductions in warfarin anticoagulant effect, the ratios of geometric means for the area under the international normalized ratio (INR)-time curve from dosing until the time of the last measurable INR value or maximum-observed INR response being 0.94 (0.93-0.96) and 0.88 (0.84-0.92), respectively, the magnitude and direction of these changes do not suggest a safety concern from this interaction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Area Under Curve; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Asian People; Chromatography, Liquid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Exenatide; Genotype; Haplotypes; Headache; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Warfarin

The pharmacology and tolerability of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied.. Two randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Treatment with oral antidiabetic agents was stopped 14 days before study initiation. In the first study (study A), eight subjects received placebo, 0.1-, 0.2-, 0.3-, and either 0.4-microg/kg exenatide or placebo five minutes before a meal combined with liquid acetaminophen (to assess the rate of gastric emptying) on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. In the second study (study B), subjects received a single s.c. dose of exenatide or placebo on consecutive days. Part 1 of study B used exenatide doses of 0.01 and 0.1 microg/ kg; 0.02-, 0.05-, and 0.1-microg/kg doses were given in part 2. After an overnight fast, the study drug was injected 15 minutes before a meal (part 1) and before a meal and acetaminophen (part 2). Parts 1 and 2 of study B enrolled six and eight patients, respectively.. In both studies, plasma exenatide pharmacokinetic profiles appeared dose proportional. Exenatide doses of 0.02-0.2 microg/kg dose-dependently lowered postprandial glucose excursions. Exenatide suppressed postprandial plasma glucagon and slowed gastric emptying. There were no serious adverse events and no patient withdrawals related to treatment. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events and were mild to moderate in severity at doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 microg/kg.. Administration of preprandial exenatide by s.c. injection resulted in dose-proportional exenatide pharmacokinetics and antidiabetic pharmacodynamic activity. At doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 microg/kg, exenatide dose-dependently reduced postprandial plasma glucose excursion by insulinotropism, suppression of plasma glucagon, and slowing of gastric emptying.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Single-Blind Method; Venoms; Vomiting

This open-label study investigated the effect of exenatide coadministration on the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of digoxin. A total of 21 healthy male subjects received digoxin (day 1, 0.5 mg twice daily; days 2-12, 0.25 mg once daily) and exenatide (days 8-12, 10 microg twice daily). Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were measured on days 7 and 12. Exenatide coadministration did not change the overall 24-hour steady-state digoxin exposure (AUCtau,ss) and Cmin,ss but caused a 17% decrease in mean plasma digoxin Cmax,ss (1.40 to 1.16 ng/mL) and an increase in digoxin tmax,ss (median increase, 2.5 hours). Although the decrease in digoxin Cmax,ss was statistically significant, peak concentrations were within the therapeutic concentration range in all subjects. Digoxin urinary pharmacokinetic parameters were not altered. Gastrointestinal symptoms, the most common adverse effects of exenatide, decreased over time. Exenatide administration does not cause any changes in digoxin steady-state pharmacokinetics that would be expected to have clinical sequelae; thus, dosage adjustment does not appear warranted, based on pharmacokinetic considerations.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Cardiotonic Agents; Digoxin; Drug Interactions; Exenatide; Humans; Male; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms

Physicians may use either insulin or exenatide injections for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have poor glycemic control despite taking oral blood glucose-lowering drugs.. To compare effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is suboptimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea.. 26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.. 82 outpatient study centers in 13 countries.. 551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.. Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Hemoglobin A1c level, fasting plasma glucose level, body weight, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose, standardized test-meal challenge, safety, and tolerability.. Baseline mean hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2% for patients receiving exenatide and 8.3% for those receiving insulin glargine. At week 26, both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced hemoglobin A1c levels by 1.11% (difference, 0.017 percentage point [95% CI, -0.123 to 0.157 percentage point]). Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide. Body weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine (difference, -4.1 kg [CI, -4.6 to -3.5 kg]). Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).. The trial was open-label and did not assess clinical complications related to diabetes. Of the 551 participants, 19.4% of those receiving exenatide and 9.7% of those receiving insulin glargine withdrew from the study. Only 21.6% of the insulin glargine group and 8.6% of the exenatide group achieved the target level for fasting plasma glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Exenatide and insulin glargine achieved similar improvements in overall glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with oral combination therapy. Exenatide was associated with weight reduction and had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than insulin glargine.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

There is a critical unmet need for therapeutics to treat the epidemic of comorbidities associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes, ideally devoid of nausea/emesis. This study developed monomeric peptide agonists of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) and neuropeptide Y2 receptor (Y2-R) based on exendin-4 (Ex-4) and PYY

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Blood Glucose; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Humans; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Microsomes, Liver; Models, Molecular; Molecular Docking Simulation; Nausea; Peptide YY; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Neuropeptide Y; Shrews; Structure-Activity Relationship; Vomiting; Weight Loss

While pharmacological glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists are FDA-approved for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, a major side effect is nausea/malaise. We recently developed a conjugate of vitamin B12 (B12) bound to the GLP-1R agonist exendin-4 (Ex4), which displays enhanced proteolytic stability and retention of GLP-1R agonism. Here, we evaluate whether the conjugate (B12-Ex4) can improve glucose tolerance without producing anorexia and malaise.. We evaluated the effects of systemic B12-Ex4 and unconjugated Ex4 on food intake and body weight change, oral glucose tolerance and nausea/malaise in male rats, and on intraperitoneal glucose tolerance in mice. To evaluate whether differences in the profile of effects of B12-Ex4 vs unconjugated Ex4 are the result of altered CNS penetrance, rats received systemic injections of fluorescein-Ex4 (Flex), Cy5-B12 or Cy5-B12-Ex4 and brain penetrance was evaluated using confocal microscopy. Uptake of systemically administered Cy5-B12-Ex4 in insulin-containing pancreatic beta cells was also examined.. B12-Ex4 conjugate improves glucose tolerance, but does not elicit the malaise and anorexia produced by unconjugated Ex4. While Flex robustly penetrates into the brain (dorsal vagal complex, paraventricular hypothalamus), Cy5-B12 and Cy5-B12-Ex4 fluorescence were not observed centrally, supporting an absence of CNS penetrance, in line with observed reduction in CNS-associated Ex4 side effects. Cy5-B12-Ex4 colocalizes with insulin in the pancreas, suggesting direct pancreatic action as a potential mechanism underlying the hypoglycaemic effects of B12-Ex4.. These novel findings highlight the potential clinical utility of B12-Ex4 conjugates as possible future T2DM therapeutics with reduced incidence of adverse effects.

Topics: Animals; Appetite Regulation; Behavior, Animal; Blood-Brain Barrier; Drug Stability; Energy Intake; Energy Metabolism; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose Intolerance; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Nausea; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Recombinant Proteins; Tissue Distribution; Vitamin B 12

Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) is an increasingly prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality among U.S. adults, with increasing prevalence in emergency department (ED) visits. Multiple medications, such as exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, have been developed in the past decade to combat this growing problem. This medication is well documented to cause gastrointestinal upset and skin nodules at the injection site. However, currently no documented cases exist regarding manipulation of injection nodules causing increased absorption or reports demonstrating an increase in adverse drug reactions.. We report an interesting case of an adult male patient who likely experienced increased systemic absorption of exenatide by manipulating an injection nodule, which ultimately resulted in nausea, retching, diarrhea, and a tachycardic heart rate of 130-140 beats/min. These symptoms are known side effects of exenatide. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Given the high frequency of DM patients presenting to the ED, emergency physicians should be familiar with diabetic maintenance medications and their adverse reactions. Treating these side effects and properly educating patients can alleviate discomfort, prevent future adverse reactions, and decrease return visits to the ED.

Topics: Chest Pain; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Emergency Service, Hospital; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injection Site Reaction; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Tachycardia

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are indicated for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes and obesity, but can cause nausea and emesis in some patients. GLP-1 receptors are distributed widely in the brain, where they contribute to mechanisms of emesis, reduced appetite and aversion, but it is not known if these centrally located receptors also contribute to a modulation of gastric slow wave activity, which is linked causally to nausea. Our aim was to investigate the potential of the GLP-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4, administered into the 3rd ventricle to modulate emesis, feeding and gastric slow wave activity. Thermoregulation and cardiovascular parameters were also monitored, as they are disturbed during nausea. Ferrets were used as common laboratory rodents do not have an emetic reflex. A guide cannula was implanted into the 3rd ventricle for delivering a previously established dose of exendin-4 (10nmol), which had been shown to induce emesis and behaviours indicative of 'nausea'. Radiotelemetry recorded gastric myoelectric activity (GMA; slow waves), blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV), and core temperature; food intake and behaviour were also assessed. Exendin-4 (10nmol, i.c.v.) decreased the dominant frequency of GMA, with an associated increase in the percentage of bradygastric power (lasting ~4h). Food intake was inhibited in all animals, with 63% exhibiting emesis. Exendin-4 also increased blood pressure (lasting ~24h) and heart rate (lasting ~7h), decreased HRV (lasting ~24h), and caused transient hyperthermia. None of the above parameters were emesis-dependent. The present study shows for the first time that gastric slow waves may be modulated by GLP-1 receptors in the brain through mechanisms that appear independent from emesis. Taken together with a reduction in HRV, the findings are consistent with changes associated with the occurrence of nausea in humans.

Topics: Animals; Blood Pressure; Body Temperature; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Eating; Exenatide; Ferrets; Gastrointestinal Motility; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Rate; Male; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

GLP-1 receptor agonists are utilised for the treatment of Type-2 diabetes but can be associated with undesirable effects of nausea and vomiting.. To investigate the role of GLP-1 receptors in mechanisms of emesis, behaviours indicative of nausea (BIN) and food intake in the ferret.. Exendin-4 (10 and 30nmol, i.c.v.) induced emesis, inhibited food intake, and increased the frequency of BIN. Increases in c-Fos in the brainstem, midbrain and forebrain occurred in animals exhibiting emesis; no activation of the brainstem occurred in animals not vomiting. Exendin-4 (10nmol, i.c.v.) when preceded by i.c.v. saline (15μl), was not emetic but induced BIN and inhibited food intake; exendin (9-39) (100nmol) reduced BIN only. c-Fos showed that consistent with the absence of emesis in saline/exendin-4 treated animals there was no increase in c-Fos in the brainstem, but it increased in midbrain and forebrain nuclei. Excepting the amygdala, exendin (9-39) was without efffect on the increases in c-Fos. Analysis of c-Fos data showed a positive linear relationship between midbrain and forebrain areas irrespective of the occurrence of emesis induced by exendin-4. In contrast, brainstem and midbrain c-Fos levels were positively correlated, but only in animals with emesis.. The brainstem is critical for exendin-4-induced emesis but suppression of food intake and BIN involves more rostral brain sites. Exendin-4-induced BIN and c-Fos activation of the amygdala are sensitive to exendin (9-39), whereas the suppression of food intake is not implicating separate control mechanisms for emesis and BIN.

Topics: Animals; Brain; Catheters, Indwelling; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eating; Emetics; Exenatide; Ferrets; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Immunohistochemistry; Injections, Intraventricular; Male; Motor Activity; Nausea; Neural Pathways; Peptides; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos; Venoms; Vomiting

The effects of exenatide on glycemic control, lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and gastrointestinal symptoms were investigated in obese Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Twenty-six outpatients were enrolled and administered 5 μg of exenatide twice daily. If there was insufficient weight loss and/or insufficient improvement in glycemic control, the dose was increased to 10 μg twice daily. Follow-up was continued until the 12th week of administration. Hemoglobin A1c, glycoalbumin, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, fasting serum C-peptide, serum lipids, blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured before and after the observation period. In the initial phase of exenatide therapy, each patient received a diary to record gastrointestinal symptoms. During treatment with exenatide, hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly and serum C-peptide increased significantly. Body weight, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure decreased significantly. Nausea was the most frequent gastrointestinal symptom and occurred in 16 patients. Its onset was noted at a mean of 1.7 h after injection, the mean duration was 1.1 h, and it continued for a mean of 9.3 days after the initiation of administration. Patients with nausea showed a significant decrease in hemoglobin Alc, glycoalbumin, or body weight compared with those without nausea. These findings suggest that a more marked improvement in metabolic parameters by exenatide can be partly dependent on the manifestation of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Obesity; Peptides; Venoms; Weight Loss

The FDA-approved glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists exendin-4 and liraglutide reduce food intake and body weight. Nausea is the most common adverse side effect reported with these GLP-1R agonists. Whether food intake suppression by exendin-4 and liraglutide occurs independently of nausea is unknown. Further, the neurophysiological mechanisms mediating the nausea associated with peripheral GLP-1R agonist use are poorly understood. Using two established rodent models of nausea [conditioned taste avoidance (CTA) and pica (ingestion of nonnutritive substances)], results show that all peripheral doses of exendin-4 that suppress food intake also produce CTA, whereas one dose of liraglutide suppresses intake without producing CTA. Chronic (12 days) daily peripheral administration of exendin-4 produces a progressive increase in pica coupled with stable, sustained food intake and body weight suppression, whereas the pica response and food intake reduction by daily liraglutide are more transient. Results demonstrate that the nausea response accompanying peripheral exendin-4 occurs via a vagal-independent pathway involving GLP-1R activation in the brain as the exendin-4-induced pica response is attenuated with CNS co-administration of the GLP-1R antagonist exendin-(9-39), but not by vagotomy. Direct administration of exendin-4 to the medial subnucleus of the nucleus tractus solitarius (mNTS), but not to the central nucleus of the amygdala, reduced food intake and produced a pica response, establishing the mNTS as a potential GLP-1R-expressing site mediating nausea responses associated with GLP-1R agonists.

Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Eating; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Nausea; Peptides; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Glucagon; Solitary Nucleus; Vagus Nerve; Venoms

To use time trade-off (TTO) to compare patient preferences for profiles of two glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (liraglutide and exenatide) that vary on four key attributes - efficacy (as measured by hemoglobin A(1C)), incidence of nausea, incidence of hypoglycemia, and dosing frequency (QD vs. BID) - and measure the contribution of those attributes to preferences.. A total of 382 people with T2DM were recruited to participate in an internet-based survey consisting of a series of health-related questions, a conjoint exercise and a set of time trade-off items. In the conjoint exercise, respondents were presented with eight pairs of hypothetical GLP-1 profiles, and completed a time-tradeoff exercise for each pair.. The product profile representing liraglutide was preferred by 96% of respondents and resulted in significantly higher health utilities (0.038) than the product profile representing exenatide (0.978 vs. 0.94, p < 0.05). Estimated preference scores from the conjoint analysis revealed that efficacy measured by hemoglobin A(1C) is the most important attribute, followed by nausea, hypoglycemia, and dosing schedule.. On-line participants may not represent 'typical' type 2 diabetes patients, and brief product profiles represented results from clinical trials, not clinical practice. Based on the four attributes presented, patients prefer liraglutide over exenatide. Preference is based on superior efficacy and less nausea more than less hypoglycemia and once-daily dosing.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Patient Preference; Peptides; Quality of Life; Socioeconomic Factors; Venoms

To evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of treatment with exenatide in combination with insulin (a use not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration).. Electronic medical records of 3 private-practice endocrinologists were reviewed to identify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin who subsequently began exenatide therapy. Patients' baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1C) levels, weights, lipid profiles, blood pressures, and medication utilization were compared with corresponding data obtained after a minimal duration of 12 months.. We identified 134 patients with T2DM initiating exenatide therapy in combination with insulin between April 2005 and April 2006. One-year follow-up information was available for 124 patients. Exenatide use resulted in a significant 0.87% reduction in A1C (P<.001), despite a 45% discontinuation of premeal insulin use (P<.001), a 9-U reduction in mean premeal insulin doses (P = .0066), a reduction in the median number of daily insulin injections from 2 to 1 (P = .0053), and a 59% discontinuation rate of sulfonylurea use (P = .0088). Exenatide use was associated with a mean weight loss of 5.2 kg (P<.001), with 72% of evaluable patients losing weight. Forty-eight patients (36%) discontinued exenatide therapy during the first year, primarily attributable to gastrointestinal intolerance. Fourteen patients (10%) experienced hypoglycemia, most of which was mild.. Exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with T2DM was associated with significant reductions in A1C and weight after 1 year of therapy. This was offset, however, by an exenatide discontinuation rate of 36%, primarily due to adverse gastrointestinal effects.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Vomiting

Topics: Exenatide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Peptides; Venoms

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Topics: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Gastroparesis; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venoms

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

Exendin-4 is a long-acting potent agonist of the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor and may be useful in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. We examined the effects of an intravenous infusion of exendin-4 (0.05 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) compared with a control saline infusion in healthy volunteers. Exendin-4 reduced fasting plasma glucose levels and reduced the peak change of postprandial glucose from baseline (exendin-4, 1.5 +/- 0.3 vs. saline, 2.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.05). Gastric emptying was delayed, as measured by the paracetamol absorption method. Volunteers consumed 19% fewer calories at a free-choice buffet lunch with exendin-4 (exendin-4, 867 +/- 79 vs. saline 1,075 +/- 93 kcal, P = 0.012), without reported side effects. Thus our results are in accord with the possibility that exendin-4 may be a potential treatment for type 2 diabetes, particularly for obese patients, because it acts to reduce plasma glucose at least partly by a delay in gastric emptying, as well as by reducing calorie intake.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Depression, Chemical; Energy Intake; Energy Metabolism; Exenatide; Fasting; Female; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Hormones; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Lizards; Male; Nausea; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Protein Precursors; Satiety Response; Venoms