levoleucovorin and Margins-of-Excision

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world and between 50% and 60% of patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the disease. There have been great improvements in the management of CRLM during the last decades. The combination of modern chemotherapeutic and biological systemic treatments with aggressive surgical resection strategies is currently the base for the treatment of patients considered unresectable until few years ago. Furthermore, several new treatments for the local control of CRLM have been developed and are now part of the arsenal of multidisciplinary teams for the treatment of these complex patients. The aim of this review was to summarize and update the management of CRLM, its controversies and relevant evidence.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Electroporation; Fluorouracil; Hepatectomy; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Leucovorin; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Margins of Excision; Microwaves; Organoplatinum Compounds; Prognosis; Radiofrequency Ablation; Reoperation

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease with a very poor prognosis. In contrast to treatments for many other tumor types, cytotoxic agents are still the first-line drugs for pancreatic cancer in both the palliative and adjuvant settings. Some progress has been made in recent years, but most large phase 3 studies have not shown significant improvements in survival. Because the available drugs and regimens are limited in both type and effect, the selection of chemotherapy based on clinicopathologic characteristics may be consequential for pancreatic cancer. In the present report, we focused on 7 landmark clinical trials for pancreatic cancer. We observed that FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) and NG (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine), 2 first-line regimens, exerted opposite effects on metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with different baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. This suggested that not only the performance status but possibly also CA19-9 levels should be considered when making a therapeutic choice for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Moreover, we found that patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer who have undergone a surgical resection with a negative margin (R0) may benefit more from fluorouracil and/or oral prodrugs of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy than from gemcitabine. Conversely, gemcitabine or gemcitabine-based regimens may be more effective for patients with a positive resection margin (R1). Based on these findings, we propose flowcharts for selecting chemotherapy for both advanced and resected pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we present possible mechanisms and interpretations underlying the selection of chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer and propose the tumor burden as a key variable in this process. Regardless of the possible bias and exact treatment selection process, this study offers an opportunity to improve patient outcomes by using agents currently used in the therapy of pancreatic cancer. Although these conclusions are based on indirect evidence, we provide insights and possibilities to drive the selection of chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Albumins; Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Fluorouracil; Gemcitabine; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Margins of Excision; Organometallic Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Paclitaxel; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome

Local and distant disease recurrence are frequently observed following pancreatic cancer resection, but an improved understanding of resection margin assessment is required to aid tailored therapies.. Analyses were carried out to assess the association between clinical characteristics and margin involvement as well as the effects of individual margin involvement on site of recurrence and overall and recurrence-free survival using individual patient data from the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 randomized controlled trial.. There were 1151 patients, of whom 505 (43.9%) had an R1 resection. The median and 95% confidence interval (CI) overall survival was 24.9 (22.9-27.2) months for 646 (56.1%) patients with resection margin negative (R0 >1 mm) tumors, 25.4 (21.6-30.4) months for 146 (12.7%) patients with R1<1 mm positive resection margins, and 18.7 (17.2-21.1) months for 359 (31.2%) patients with R1-direct positive margins (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, overall R1-direct tumor margins, poor tumor differentiation, positive lymph node status, WHO performance status ≥1, maximum tumor size, and R1-direct posterior resection margin were all independently significantly associated with reduced overall and recurrence-free survival. Competing risks analysis showed that overall R1-direct positive resection margin status, positive lymph node status, WHO performance status 1, and R1-direct positive superior mesenteric/medial margin resection status were all significantly associated with local recurrence.. R1-direct resections were associated with significantly reduced overall and recurrence-free survival following pancreatic cancer resection. Resection margin involvement was also associated with an increased risk for local recurrence.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Deoxycytidine; Fluorouracil; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leucovorin; Margins of Excision; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis

Although consensus statements support the preoperative treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, no prospective, quality-controlled, multicenter studies of this strategy have been conducted. Existing studies are retrospective and confounded by heterogeneity in patients studied, therapeutic algorithms used, and outcomes reported.. To determine the feasibility of conducting studies of multimodality therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in the cooperative group setting.. A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of a multimodality treatment regimen administered within a study framework using centralized quality control with the cooperation of 14 member institutions of the National Clinical Trials Network. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic cancer preregistered, and 23 patients with tumors who met centrally reviewed radiographic criteria registered. Twenty-two patients initiated therapy (median age, 64 years [range, 50-76 years]; 55% female). Patients registered between May 29, 2013, and February 7, 2014.. Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX treatment (85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m2 of irinotecan hydrochloride, 400 mg/m2 of leucovorin calcium, and then 2400 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil for 4 cycles) followed by 5.5 weeks of external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy delivered in 28 daily fractions) with capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally twice daily) prior to pancreatectomy.. Feasibility, defined by the accrual rate, the safety of the preoperative regimen, and the pancreatectomy rate.. The accrual rate of 2.6 patients per month was superior to the anticipated rate. Although 14 of the 22 patients (64% [95% CI, 41%-83%]) had grade 3 or higher adverse events, 15 of the 22 patients (68% [95% CI, 49%-88%]) underwent pancreatectomy. Of these 15 patients, 12 (80%) required vascular resection, 14 (93%) had microscopically negative margins, 5 (33%) had specimens that had less than 5% residual cancer cells, and 2 (13%) had specimens that had pathologic complete responses. The median overall survival of all patients was 21.7 months (95% CI, 15.7 to not reached) from registration.. The successful completion of this collaborative study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting quality-controlled trials for this disease stage in the multi-institutional setting. The data generated by this study and the logistical elements that facilitated the trial's completion are currently being used to develop cooperative group trials with the goal of improving outcomes for this subset of patients.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01821612.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Capecitabine; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemoradiotherapy; Feasibility Studies; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm, Residual; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Survival Rate

Historically, a positive margin after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was associated with decreased survival. In an era when neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being used frequently, the prognostic significance of margin status is unclear.. Patients with localized PDAC who received NAC and underwent pancreatectomy from 2011 to 2018 were identified from a single-institution database. Patients with fewer than 2 months of NAC, R2 resection, or fewer than 90 days of follow-up were excluded. A positive margin included tumors within 1 mm of the surgical margin.. Four hundred and sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 65 years and 53% were female. Preoperative clinical staging demonstrated that most had locally advanced (n = 222 [47%]) or borderline resectable (n = 172 [37%]) disease. Median follow-up was 18.5 months (interquartile range 10.6 to 30.0 months). Median duration of NAC was 119 days (interquartile range 87 to 168 days). FOLFIRINOX was first-line therapy for 67%, and 73% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Most underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (69%). Forty percent were node-positive and 80% had an R0 resection. Fifty-six percent received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 22.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 25.1 months) and 11.0 months (95% CI, 10.0 to 12.1 months). On multivariate analysis, margin status was not a significant predictor of overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Factors associated with overall survival included clinical stage, duration of NAC, nodal status, histopathologic treatment response score, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.. Microscopic margin positivity is not associated with recurrence and survival in localized PDAC patients resected after treatment with NAC. Aggressive surgical extirpation in high-volume centers should be considered in selected patients after extensive NAC.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Oxaliplatin; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies

Factors for overall survival after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) seem to be nodal status, chemotherapy administration, UICC staging, and resection margin. However, there is no consensus on the definition for tumor free resection margin. Therefore, univariate OS as well as multivariate long-term survival using cancer center data was analyzed with regards to two different resection margin definitions. Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria (pancreatic head PDAC, R0/R1, no 30 days mortality). OS was analyzed in univariate analysis with respect to R-status, CRM (circumferential resection margin; positive: ≤1mm; negative: >1mm), nodal status, and chemotherapy administration. Long-term survival >36 months was modelled using multivariate logistic regression instead of Cox regression because the distribution function of the dependent data violated the requirements for the application of this test. Significant differences in OS were found regarding the R status (Median OS and 95%CI for R0: 29.8 months, 22.3-37.4; R1: 15.9 months, 9.2-22.7; p = 0.005), nodal status (pN0 = 34.7, 10.4-59.0; pN1 = 17.1, 11.5-22.8; p = 0.003), and chemotherapy (with CTx: 26.7, 20.4-33.0; without CTx: 9.7, 5.2-14.1; p < .001). OS according to CRM status differed on a clinically relevant level by about 12 months (CRM positive: 17.2 months, 11.5-23.0; CRM negative: 29.8 months, 18.6-41.1; p = 0.126). A multivariate model containing chemotherapy, nodal status, and CRM explained long-term survival (p = 0.008; correct prediction >70%). Chemotherapy, nodal status and resection margin according to UICC R status are univariate factors for OS after PDAC. In contrast, long-term survival seems to depend on wider resection margins than those used in UICC R classification. Therefore, standardized histopathological reporting (including resection margin size) should be agreed upon.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Irinotecan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Oxaliplatin; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Despite improvements in the multimodality treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), oncological outcomes remain poor. This study evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation on the pathologic response and the rate of resections with clear margins (R0 resection) in relation to long-term oncological outcomes.. All consecutive patients with LRRC treated in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven who underwent a resection after treatment with induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Induction chemotherapy consisted of CAPOX/FOLFOX. Endpoints were pathologic response, resection margin and overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and metastasis free survival (MFS).. A pathologic complete response was observed in 22 patients (17%), a "good" response (Mandard 2-3) in 74 patients (56%), and a "poor" response (Mandard 4-5) in 36 patients (27%). An R0 resection was obtained in 83 patients (63%). The degree of pathologic response was linearly correlated with the R0 resection rate (p = 0.026). In patients without synchronous metastases, pathologic response was an independent predictor for LRFS, MFS, and DFS (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.024, respectively), whereas R0 resection was an independent predictor for LRFS and OS (p = 0.020 and p = 0.028, respectively).. Induction chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation is a promising treatment strategy for patients with LRRC with high pathologic response rates that translate into improved oncological outcomes, especially when an R0 resection has been achieved.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Leucovorin; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Proctectomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy affecting approximately 3000 patients per year in the United States, and there is limited evidence prognosticating patients with resected SBA. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors and the role of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected SBA.. Two hundred forty-one patients who had resected stage I-III SBA were retrospectively identified at a single tertiary referral institution. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed to identify significant variables by univariate and multivariate analysis.. Median OS for the entire group was 54.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.2-81.2 months), with 5- and 10-year OS of 48% and 35%. Median follow-up was 113.7 months (95% CI, 97.9-126.6 months). For patients with stage III disease who received adjuvant therapy, the median OS was 33.8 months (95% CI, 27.8-78.8) compared to 24.7 months (95% CI, 11.5-37.8) for patients with no adjuvant therapy (P < .01). Male sex, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, increased positive lymph node ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56, presence of residual disease, and earlier date of diagnosis predicted worse survival on univariate analysis. Age > 60 years, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56, and advanced T stage were identified as independent negative predictors of OS for all patients by multivariate analysis.. Advanced age, advanced T stage, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56 independently predicted survival in resected SBA. Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with resected stage III SBA.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intestinal Neoplasms; Intestine, Small; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Monocytes; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Ampullary adenocarcinoma is a rare entity with limited data on prognostic factors. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors and assess the benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy.. A cohort of 121 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2016 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. All patients were confirmed by independent pathologic review to have ampullary carcinoma. Patient survival and its correlation with patient and tumor variables were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.. Fifty three patients (45%) received adjuvant therapy (34 patients had chemotherapy alone, while 19 patients received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy). Fifty seven percent of the patients were diagnosed with advanced stage disease (Stage IIB or higher). Nearly all patients (98.3%) had negative surgical margins. Median overall survival (OS) was 91.8 months (95% CI:52.6 months-not reached). In multivariate analysis, excellent performance status (ECOG: 0), adjuvant therapy, and advanced stage remained statistically significant. Adjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved disease free survival (Hazard ratio [HR]:0.52, P = 0.04) and overall survival (HR:0.45, P = 0.03) in patients with advanced disease.. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with resected ampullary cancer, especially with advanced stage disease. A multi-institutional randomized trial is needed to further assess the role of adjuvant therapy in ampullary adenocarcinoma.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ampulla of Vater; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Gemcitabine; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Young Adult

To investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of liver first approach (LFA) in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), evaluating the predictive factors of survival.. Sixty-two out of 301 patients presenting with synchronous CRLM underwent LFA between 2007 and 2016. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant treatment patients were re-evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Liver resection was scheduled after 4-6 weeks. Changes in non-tumoral parenchyma and the tumor response according to the Tumor Regression Grade score (TRG) were assessed on surgical specimens. Primary tumor resection was scheduled 4-8 weeks following hepatectomy.. Five patients out of 62 (8.1%) showed "Progressive Disease" at re-evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 22 (35.5%) showed "Stable Disease" and 35 (56.5%) "Partial Response"; of these latter, 29 (82%) showed histopathologic downstaging. The 5-year survival (OS) rate was 55%, while the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 16%. RECIST criteria, T-stage, N-stage and TRG were independently associated with OS. Bilobar presentation of disease, RECIST criteria, R1 margin and TRG were independently associated with DFS. Patients with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better survival than those with stable or progressive disease (radiological response 5-y OS: 65% vs. 50%; 5-y DFS: 20% vs. 10%; pathological response 5-y OS: 75% vs. 56%; 5-y DFS: 45% vs. 11%).. LFA is an oncologically safe strategy. Selection is a critical point, and the best results in terms of OS and DFS are observed in patients having radiological and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Camptothecin; Cetuximab; Cohort Studies; Colectomy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Hepatectomy; Humans; Leucovorin; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Margins of Excision; Metastasectomy; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Organoplatinum Compounds; Radiotherapy; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Optimal margin size when resecting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unclear, particularly in the setting of perioperative chemotherapy. We evaluated the prognostic significance of margin size in patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFOX and/or FOLFIRI prior to resection of CRLM.. Clinicopathologic factors were collected for patients who underwent curative liver resections for CRLM between 4/2004-1/2016 and received neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan and 5-FU (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI). Margins were categorized as < 1, ≥ 1-< 5, ≥ 5-< 10, or ≥ 10 mm and evaluated for association with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by Cox multiple regression analysis. Margin status was classified as positive (< 1 mm) or negative (≥ 1 mm) and similarly evaluated.. Of 227 patients, the median age was 58 years and most had synchronous (80%) lesions. The majority had colon cancers (75%). Margin sizes were 13% < 1 mm, 27% ≥ 1-< 5 mm, 23% ≥ 5-< 10 mm, 36% ≥ 10 mm. Most (63%) received chemotherapy post-liver resection. Five-year OS and DFS were 54% (95% CI 46-62%) and 22% (95% CI 16-28%), respectively. Positive margins significantly increased the risk of death without post-liver resection chemotherapy (HR = 3.32, p = 0.0077), but not with post-liver resection chemotherapy (HR = 1.00, p = 0.99). Negative margin sizes of ≥ 1-< 5, ≥ 5-< 10, and ≥ 10 mm were not significant predictors of OS (p > 0.05).. Patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM should receive post-resection chemotherapy if negative margins (≥ 1 mm) cannot be achieved. For patients receiving FOLFOX and/or FOLFIRI chemotherapy, wider margins did not improve OS.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Hepatectomy; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome

To compare neoadjuvant to adjuvant chemoradiation in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.. Single-institution data were obtained for patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation from 2011 to 2014. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and pathological outcomes.. Fifty-two well-matched patients were enrolled (21 underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 11 with adjuvant chemoradiation and 20 in the definitive group). Median tumor size was 2.6 cm pretreatment and 2.5 cm after neoadjuvant chemoradiation but 3.2 cm on pathology, with a treatment effect in 95.2% of specimens. Clinical node positivity at diagnosis for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiation groups was similar (28.6% vs 27.3%, P = 0.12). Of the 36 neoadjuvant patients, 21 (58.3%) underwent complete resection. In the neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemoradiation groups, positive margins were decreased (4.8% vs 63.6%, P < 0.001), as was pathological nodal positivity (23.8% vs 90.9%, P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, locoregional control for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiation was 7.7 and 7.2 months, respectively (P = 0.12) and the definitive group was 1.2 months (P = 0.014 compared with the surgical cohort). One-year overall survival was better with neoadjuvant than with adjuvant chemoradiation but this was not significant (94% vs 82%, P = 0.20); 1-year survival for the definitive group was 59% (P = 0.03 compared with the surgical cohort).. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation remains a promising approach for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer for improving resectability and pathological and clinical findings. Computed tomography may not fully demonstrate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Deoxycytidine; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Gemcitabine; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm, Residual; Organometallic Compounds; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tumor Burden