levoleucovorin and cediranib

Bevacizumab improves outcome for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) when added to chemotherapy. The HORIZON I trial resulted in similar outcome with bevacizumab or cediranib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, as treatment of advanced CRC. The spectrum of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme expression was examined in serum samples of HORIZON I participants to identify biomarkers predictive of efficacy of VEGF pathway inhibitors.. Total LDH levels, as well as LDH isoenzyme levels in frozen baseline serum samples, were retrospectively evaluated. Total LDH serum levels measured during the study, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were available from the HORIZON I study data.. Total LDH levels measured in the frozen serum samples correlated with those measured in fresh samples. The expected reciprocal correlation was found between hypoxic and oxic LDH isoenzymes. High total LDH correlated with shorter PFS, and high hypoxia-related LDH isoenzymes correlated with shorter PFS and OS. The difference in outcome of the cediranib-treated patients vs. those treated with bevacizumab was not substantially different in the various LDH isoform expression subgroups. In patients with a hypoxic LDH pattern of expression, there was a nonsignificant trend of better outcome in cediranib-treated patients.. Evaluation of total LDH and its isoforms in frozen serum samples is feasible. High total LDH and high hypoxic LDH isoenzymes were associated with poor prognosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the predictive value of LDH isoenzyme expression pattern for VEGF-pathway inhibition efficacy.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Isoenzymes; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Leucovorin; Organoplatinum Compounds; Prognosis; Quinazolines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The prognostic and predictive value of multiple serum biomarkers was evaluated using samples from a randomised phase III study (HORIZON II) investigating chemotherapy with or without cediranib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).. Baseline levels of 207 protein markers were measured in serum samples from 582 HORIZON II (FOLFOX/XELOX plus cediranib 20 mg (n=330) or placebo (n=252)) patients. Median baseline values of each biomarker were used to categorise patients as high or low. Markers were then assessed for their association with efficacy, defined by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A generalised boosted regression model identified markers of particular interest.. Correlation of protein levels with PFS and OS suggested that multiple factors had a prognostic value, independent of treatment arm, including IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP), ICAM-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Among the angiogenesis regulators, low levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-D, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-3, NRP1 and Tie-2 correlated with better outcome.. This large data set generated using serum samples from mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy and VEGF inhibitors, defines baseline characteristics for 207 serum proteins. Multiple prognostic factors were identified that could be disease related or predict which patients derive most benefit from 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy, meriting further exploration in prospective studies.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Blood Proteins; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaloacetates; Placebos; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Quinazolines; Survival Analysis

Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody with clinical benefit in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).. Patients with mCRC who had progressed following first-line therapy were randomised 1:1:1 to modified (m)FOLFOX6 plus cediranib (20 or 30 mg day(-1)) or bevacizumab (10 mg kg(-1) every 2 weeks). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms.. A total of 210 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (cediranib 20 mg, n=71; cediranib 30 mg, n=73; bevacizumab, n=66). Median PFS in the cediranib 20 mg, cediranib 30 mg and bevacizumab groups was 5.8, 7.2 and 7.8 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms for PFS (cediranib 20 mg vs bevacizumab: HR=1.28 (95% CI, 0.85-1.95; P=0.29); cediranib 30 mg vs bevacizumab: HR=1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.76; P=0.79)) or overall survival (OS). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more common with cediranib 30 mg (91.8%) vs cediranib 20 mg (81.4%) or bevacizumab (84.8%).. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms for PFS or OS. When combined with mFOLFOX6, the 20 mg day(-1) dose of cediranib was better tolerated than the 30 mg day(-1) dose.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; International Agencies; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Organoplatinum Compounds; Prognosis; Quinazolines; Salvage Therapy; Survival Rate; Young Adult

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common malignancy in Japan. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling is a clinically validated therapeutic strategy in patients with metastatic CRC. Cediranib is an oral, highly potent VEGF signaling inhibitor of all three VEGF receptors.. This Phase I study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of cediranib (20 or 30 mg) in combination with mFOLFOX6 in Japanese patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC. If the safety of the 20 mg dose was confirmed, a second cohort of patients was to be recruited to receive cediranib 30 mg + mFOLFOX6.. Six patients received cediranib 20 mg + mFOLFOX6 and seven received cediranib 30 mg + mFOLFOX6. One patient in the initial cediranib 20 mg cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 bilirubin increase); no DLTs were observed in the 30 mg cohort. The most commonly reported adverse events were diarrhea, decreased appetite, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension and fatigue. Two patients in the 20 mg cohort and three in the 30 mg cohort experienced serious adverse events during all treatment courses. Cediranib was generally well tolerated in this patient population with no evidence to suggest any significant pharmacokinetic interactions between cediranib and fluorouracil or oxaliplatin. A preliminary evaluation showed that five of nine evaluable patients achieved a best response of partial response.. Cediranib (20 or 30 mg) in combination with mFOLFOX6 was considered tolerable according to the protocol-defined criteria, providing justification for the Phase II part of this study.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Demography; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Japan; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Organoplatinum Compounds; Quinazolines; Treatment Outcome

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common malignancy in Japan. Treatment with inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathway has proven benefit in metastatic CRC. Cediranib is an oral highly potent VEGF signalling inhibitor that inhibits all three VEGF receptors.. In this phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 172 patients with metastatic CRC were randomised to receive once-daily cediranib (20 or 30 mg) or placebo, each combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6). The primary objective was comparison of progression-free survival (PFS).. The comparison of cediranib 20 mg versus placebo met the primary objective of PFS prolongation [hazard ratio = 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.44-1.11), P = 0.167], which met the protocol-defined criterion of P < 0.2. Median PFS was 10.2 versus 8.3 months, respectively. The PFS comparison for cediranib 30 mg versus placebo did not meet the criterion. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the cediranib-containing groups were diarrhoea and hypertension.. Cediranib 20 mg plus mFOLFOX6 met the predefined criteria in terms of improved PFS compared with placebo plus mFOLFOX6. Cediranib 20 mg was generally well tolerated and the AE profile was consistent with previous studies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Quinazolines; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

To compare the efficacy of cediranib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor [VEGFR TKI]) with that of bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody) in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).. HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] had an adaptive phase II/III design. Patients randomly assigned 1:1:1 received mFOLFOX6 [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) intravenously followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 and then continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m(2) over the next 46 hours every 2 weeks] with cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 14 days). An independent end-of-phase II analysis concluded that mFOLFOX6/cediranib 20 mg met predefined criteria for continuation; subsequent patients received mFOLFOX6/cediranib 20 mg or mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (randomly assigned 1:1). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS).. In all, 1,422 patients received mFOLFOX6/cediranib 20 mg (n = 709) or mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (n = 713). Primary analysis revealed no significant difference between arms for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.25; P = .119), overall survival (OS; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.10; P = .541), or overall response rate (46.3% v 47.3%). Median PFS and OS were 9.9 and 22.8 months for mFOLFOX6/cediranib and 10.3 and 21.3 months for mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab. The PFS upper 95% CI was outside the predefined noninferiority limit (HR < 1.2). Common adverse events with more than 5% incidence in the cediranib arm included diarrhea, neutropenia, and hypertension. Cediranib-treated patients completed fewer chemotherapy cycles than bevacizumab-treated patients (median 10 v 12 cycles). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were significantly less favorable in cediranib-treated versus bevacizumab-treated patients (P < .001).. Cediranib activity, in terms of PFS and OS, was comparable to that of bevacizumab when added to mFOLFOX6; however, the predefined boundary for PFS noninferiority was not met. The cediranib safety profile was consistent with previous studies but led to less favorable PROs compared with bevacizumab. Investigation of oral TKIs in CRC continues.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Biopsy, Needle; Colorectal Neoplasms; Confidence Intervals; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Patient Selection; Proportional Hazards Models; Quinazolines; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. HORIZON II [Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN) in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] assessed infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/CAPOX) with or without cediranib in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).. Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX. In an early analysis of this and two other cediranib studies (HORIZON I [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] and HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]), the 20-mg dose met the predefined criteria for continuation. Subsequent patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the cediranib 20 mg or placebo arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary end points.. In all, 860 patients received cediranib 20 mg (n = 502) or placebo (n = 358). The addition of cediranib to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in PFS prolongation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .0121; median PFS, 8.6 months for cediranib v 8.3 months for placebo) but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P = .5707; median OS, 19.7 months for cediranib v 18.9 months for placebo). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of objective response rate, duration of response, or liver resection rate. Median chemotherapy dose-intensity was decreased by approximately 10% in patients treated with cediranib. Adverse events (AEs) associated with cediranib were manageable. CONCLUSION Addition of cediranib 20 mg to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in a modest PFS prolongation, but no significant difference in OS. The cediranib AE profile was consistent with those from previous studies. Because of the lack of improvement in OS, cediranib plus an oxaliplatin-based regimen cannot be recommended as a treatment for patients with mCRC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brazil; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Survival Analysis

Cediranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of the 3 vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and has a halflife suitable for once-daily oral dosing. It is currently in phase III development for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This article summarizes the clinical development program, which includes 2 global phase III studies, HORIZON II and HORIZON III, in the first-line treatment setting and a phase II study in second-line treatment (HORIZON I).

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Organoplatinum Compounds; Quinazolines; Treatment Outcome

Cediranib is a potent oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity associated with all subtypes of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Purposes of this study were to determine the recommended phase II dose of cediranib in combination with standard doses of modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of this combination in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.. Cediranib was administered daily orally at a starting dose of 30 mg and escalated to 45 mg daily, and mFOLFOX-6 was repeated every 14 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were done for oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cediranib. Response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every four cycles.. Sixteen patients received 150 cycles of treatment (median, 6; range, 1-20 cycles). Of 9 patients enrolled at the 30-mg dose level, 1 patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea during cycle 1. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 7 patients at the 45-mg dose level. Common grade 3 toxicities related to cediranib included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, and anorexia. Of 14 patients evaluable for response, there were 6 partial responses (42.9%; 95% confidence interval, 17.7-71.1%) and 6 stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months. There were no pharmacokinetic interactions between cediranib and 5-fluorouracil or free plasma intact oxaliplatin.. Toxicities of this combination were manageable and consistent with previous studies. The recommended phase II dose is cediranib at 30 mg daily continuously in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX-6. Cediranib and mFOLFOX-6 has promising antitumor activity and this combination warrants further investigation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Organoplatinum Compounds; Quinazolines

Data about the use and effectiveness of targeted therapy in metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are scarce.. The aim of this population-based study was to obtain insights into the use and effectiveness of targeted therapy in patients with synchronous metastases of SBA.. Data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients treated with palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy for synchronous metastatic SBA between 2007 and 2016 were included (n = 187). Differences in treatment and the subsequent effects on overall survival (OS) were evaluated.. In first-line treatment, 25 patients (13%) received additional targeted therapy, exclusively bevacizumab, and mostly in combination with CAPOX/FOLFOX (n = 24). A primary ileal tumour was predictive for receiving bevacizumab in first-line treatment (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-9.93). Median OS for patients in whom bevacizumab was added to first-line chemotherapy was 9.3 months, compared to 9.1 months with chemotherapy only (p = 0.85). Median OS for patients receiving first-line treatment only was 8.5 months with and 6.4 months without the addition of bevacizumab, respectively (p = 0.54). In multivariable survival analyses, the addition of bevacizumab was no prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.59).. Bevacizumab was the only prescribed targeted therapy in first-line treatment. Considering the limited number of patients receiving first-line bevacizumab and the unknown reasons to prescribe additional targeted therapy, the corresponding survival rates of patients treated with and without additional bevacizumab in first-line treatment might suggest a limited clinical effect of bevacizumab in addition to first-line palliative chemotherapy on OS. Future research should focus on identifying the subgroup of patients who might benefit from anti-VEGF therapy in metastatic SBA.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Intestinal Neoplasms; Intestine, Small; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Netherlands; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Palliative Care; Prognosis; Quinazolines; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate