goserelin and Chemical-and-Drug-Induced-Liver-Injury

Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug Labeling; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Risk

In a recent study by the Casodex Combination Study Group, USA, patients in a flutamide (750 mg/day) plus LH-RH agonist group showed a high treatment failure rate, mainly due to flutamide-induced diarrhea and hepatotoxicity. Our current study was conducted to determine the optimal dose of flutamide for use in this type of combination therapy.. In a randomized, multicenter study, 30 patients (hormone untreated; stage C or D) were divided into 2 groups: flutamide 250 mg (125 mg x 2; 14 patients) and flutamide 375 mg (125 mg x 3; 16 patients, and each dose combined with either goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 4 weeks) or leuprolide acetate (3.75 mg every 4 weeks). Goserelin and leuprolide were administered to patients in a 1:1 ratio. Flutamide monotherapy at a daily dose of 375 mg was determined to be the optimal dose in Japan in our previous phase II study. The endpoints of this pilot study were the objective response and adverse events during the 12-week treatment.. The objective response rate was 83.3% in the flutamide 250 mg group and 85.7% in the flutamide 175 mg group according to the Japanese response criteria for prostate cancer. Elevated PSA levels fell to within the normal range in 83.3% of the patients in the former group and in 93.3% of the patients in the latter group. One patient administered 250 mg of flutamide experienced diarrhea, while the serum GOT and/or GPT were elevated in 3 patients administered 250 mg of flutamide and 4 patients administered 375 mg of flutamide.. Based on the findings of this pilot study of maximal androgen-depletion therapy for advanced prostate cancer, 375 mg/day of flutamide is recommended in combination with an LH-RH agonist. Assessment of the effects of our recommended regimen on longer term survival, quality of life and antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome of patients treated requires additional patients and time for follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Follow-Up Studies; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms

We report a case of acute icteric hepatitis attributed to goserelin acetate, occurred during prostate cancer treatment. Gosereline acetate could induce acute hepatitis, which characteristics are close to autoimmune hepatitis type I and may require hepatic monitoring.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Autoimmune Diseases; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Goserelin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant concern in drug development due to the poor concordance between preclinical and clinical findings of liver toxicity. We hypothesized that the DILI types (hepatotoxic side effects) seen in the clinic can be translated into the development of predictive in silico models for use in the drug discovery phase. We identified 13 hepatotoxic side effects with high accuracy for classifying marketed drugs for their DILI potential. We then developed in silico predictive models for each of these 13 side effects, which were further combined to construct a DILI prediction system (DILIps). The DILIps yielded 60-70% prediction accuracy for three independent validation sets. To enhance the confidence for identification of drugs that cause severe DILI in humans, the "Rule of Three" was developed in DILIps by using a consensus strategy based on 13 models. This gave high positive predictive value (91%) when applied to an external dataset containing 206 drugs from three independent literature datasets. Using the DILIps, we screened all the drugs in DrugBank and investigated their DILI potential in terms of protein targets and therapeutic categories through network modeling. We demonstrated that two therapeutic categories, anti-infectives for systemic use and musculoskeletal system drugs, were enriched for DILI, which is consistent with current knowledge. We also identified protein targets and pathways that are related to drugs that cause DILI by using pathway analysis and co-occurrence text mining. While marketed drugs were the focus of this study, the DILIps has a potential as an evaluation tool to screen and prioritize new drug candidates or chemicals, such as environmental chemicals, to avoid those that might cause liver toxicity. We expect that the methodology can be also applied to other drug safety endpoints, such as renal or cardiovascular toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Models, Biological; Predictive Value of Tests

The incidence of flutamide-induced liver toxicity was studied in 30 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who were treated with total androgen blockage (TAB) therapy (luteinizing hormone releasing hormone [LHRH] analogue and flutamide) in our hospital during the last 3 years and in 20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who were treated by partial androgen blockage (PAB) therapy (LHRH analogue alone).. Liver function test, including measurement of serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total cholesterol, total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (gamma-GTP), and cholinesterase were performed at regular interval.. The incidence of liver toxicity in patients receiving TAB (10 cases of 25 patients) was significantly higher than in patients receiving PAB (2 of 18 patients). Two patients in whom severe liver toxicity developed after receiving TAB were hospitalized. However, after flutamide was discontinued all patients with liver damage recovered with normalization of AST and ALT levels. Levels of total cholesterol and gamma-GTP did not differ significantly in either patient group. In two patients receiving TAB total bilirubin levels showed slight, transient elevations after maximum elevations of AST and ALT. In 80% of patients receiving TAB serum levels of cholinesterase were significantly higher than those in patients receiving PAB.. These data suggest that the risk of flutamide-induced liver toxicity is significant in patients receiving TAB. However, this damage can be normalized after flutamide has been discontinued. Serum levels of cholinesterase also increase significantly in patients receiving TAB. This previously unreported phenomenon suggests an unknown effect of flutamide on liver function in patients with prostate cancer.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cholinesterases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Flutamide; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Liver Diseases; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms

To examine the frequency and severity of toxicity associated with flutamide inpatients treated with total androgen suppression before and during pelvic radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer.. Sixty-five patients with T2b-T4 prostate cancer received flutamide and goserelin acetate for 4 months, with RT beginning at the 3rd month. Treatment records including liver function test (LFT) results at baseline and during treatment were reviewed and toxicities noted.. In 30 (46%) of 65 patients, flutamide was discontinued prematurely. Primary reasons included elevation in LFT levels (n=14); gastro-intestinal toxicity (n=9); decreased hemoglobin level (n=2); patient refusal (n=2); and arthralgia, rash, and malaise (n=1 each). Hepatotoxicity generally was manifest as asymptomatic transaminase level elevation. Grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity was noted in four of 65 patients. Mean aspartase aminotransferase increased from 23 (baseline) to 67 U/L (during flutamide treatment) (P<.02); mean alanine aminotransferase level increased from 26 (baseline) to 94 U/L (during flutamide treatment) (P<.005).. Flutamide toxicity was common. LFTs should be monitored during flutamide therapy. The role of flutamide in this treatment regimen may need to be reevaluated.

Topics: Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Enzyme Tests; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Flutamide; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Goserelin; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy Dosage