goserelin and pyridinoline

To investigate the effect of medrogestone on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover under conditions of estrogen withdrawal, premenopausal women with endometriosis were treated with goserelin (Zoladex), combined with either placebo (group A, n = 12) or 10 mg medrogestone (Prothil, group B, n = 11) for six months, and followed for an additional six months. Lumbar spine BMD was measured at 0 and 6 month. Markers of bone turnover were serum bone alkaline phosphatase (sBAP) and osteocalcin (sOC) by ELISA, and urinary total pyridinoline (uPYD) and deoxypyridinoline crosslinks (uDPD) by HPLC. Patients in both groups had a similar and significant decrease in BMD after 6 months (4%, p < 0.01). The time course of changes in bone turnover, in contrast, was different in both groups. In group A, crosslink excretion increased from one month onwards, while no changes were seen in group B. In group A, sBAP levels rose during treatment, while in group B, this rise was delayed until treatment was terminated. Additionally, group B showed an initial suppression of sBAP and sOC. In both groups, sOC increased after treatment was discontinued. Medrogestone at 10 mg/d does not prevent lumbar bone loss in premenopausal women under estrogen deprivation. In the medrogestone add back group, the changes in bone turnover are compatible with low turnover bone loss,as ooposed to a state of high turnover seen in the unopposed goserelin group. This effect may be due to glucocorticoid receptor mediated actions of medrogestone on bone.

Topics: Adult; Alkaline Phosphatase; Amino Acids; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Double-Blind Method; Endometriosis; Female; Goserelin; Humans; Kinetics; Medrogestone; Osteocalcin; Osteoporosis; Placebos; Premenopause; Progesterone Congeners

A randomized trial was carried out to investigate the effect of 12 months administration of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) Zoladex in combination with either placebo or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) from the third month. Bone density, markers of bone resorption, symptoms and uterine volume were monitored in 24 women with symptomatic fibroids or menstrual problems. A total of 21 women were recruited to act as controls for the assessment of bone parameters. Vasomotor side-effects were reduced significantly in the MPA-treated group. The reduction in uterine volume in women with fibroids was not impaired by the addition of MPA. The bone markers osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase were assessed in plasma, and the cross-links pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline measured in urine. Changes in these markers are reported which suggest increases in bone resorption during the period of observation. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at the spine and forearm. The net reduction in BMD at the spine in the treated groups was 4.30 +/- 0.59% at 6 months and 7.50 +/- 0.78% at 1 year, with no change in the control group. No change was seen in forearm BMD. No protective effect was observed when MPA was added. At 1 year after the completion of treatment, BMD remained significantly below baseline, and this has implications for the prolonged use of GnRHa.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acids; Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Bone Density; Female; Goserelin; Humans; Leiomyoma; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Middle Aged; Uterine Neoplasms; Uterus

The objective of this work was to determine the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on rates of bone mineral density (BMD) loss in men with prostate cancer. It was a prospective study comparing men receiving ADT to age matched controls for 2 y. Subjects received a history, physical exam, bone mineral density measurement, and laboratory evaluation every 6 months. Thirty-nine subjects receiving continuous ADT for prostate cancer (subjects) were compared to 39 age-matched controls not receiving ADT (controls). Twenty-three subjects and 30 controls completed the study through 24 months. Men in the ADT group demonstrated greater rates of bone mineral density loss than men in the control group at every site except the lumbar spine. Twenty-four month per cent of bone mineral density loss is presented as mean+/-standard error (s.e.). At the distal forearm, the ADT group value was -9.4%+/-1.0% and -4.4%+/-0.3% for controls (P<0.0005). The ADT group femoral neck values were -1.9%+/-0.7% and 0.6%+/-0.5% in the control group (P=0.0016). The ADT group total hip value was -1.5%+/-1.0% and 0.8%+/-0.5% in the control group (P=0.0018). The ADT group trochanter value was -2.0%+/-1.3% and -0.1%+/-0.5% in the control group (P=0.0019). The ADT group lumbar spine value was -0.2%+/-0.8 % and 1.1%+/-0.6% in the control group (P=0.079). Our data demonstrate greater rates of bone mineral density loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Amino Acids; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biomarkers; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Calcium; Drug Therapy, Combination; Flutamide; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Orchiectomy; Osteoporosis; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds

To evaluate the clinical utility of recently developed biochemical markers in the assessment of bone metabolism during GnRH agonist (GnRHa) treatment, we compared five bone resorption markers [C-telopeptide (CTX) and N-telopeptide (NTX) of type I collagen, hydroxyproline (Hpr), pyridinoline (Pyr), and deoxypyridinoline (Dpyr)] and two bone formation markers [total alkaline phosphatase (Alp) and osteocalcin (OC)]. Sixty-eight normally menstruating women were injected with a long-acting GnRHa once a month for 24 weeks for the treatment of endometriosis or leiomyoma. The mean percentage bone loss at the lumbar spine was 3.79% at the end of treatment. Although levels of all markers increased significantly as the treatment progressed, CTX and NTX exhibited the highest correlation coefficients between bone loss at 24 weeks and the seven markers measured at 0, 4, 12, 16, and 24 weeks of treatment. Serum estradiol levels were similarly suppressed during the treatment in both fast losers (whose bone loss was more than the mean) and slow losers (whose bone loss was less than the mean). However, significantly higher z-scores of bone resorption markers, but not of bone formation markers, were observed in the fast losers at 24 weeks of treatment, suggesting a more accelerated bone resorption in this group. Whereas the three highest z-scores at 24 weeks of treatment were CTX, NTX, and Dpyr (in that order), the highest z-score (P < 0.05) was observed for CTX in the fast losers. The subjects in the highest quartile of CTX, the highest, and second highest quartiles of NTX at 24 weeks of treatment experienced 2.1, 2.2, and 1.7 times more bone loss (P < 0.001), respectively, than those in the lowest quartiles. Furthermore, the subjects in the highest quartile of both CTX and NTX experienced 3.6 times more bone loss (P < 0.001) than those in the lowest quartile of both markers. These results indicate that both CTX and NTX are useful and sensitive markers for bone resorption in a hypoestrogenic state induced by GnRHa.

Topics: Adult; Alkaline Phosphatase; Amino Acids; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biomarkers; Bone Remodeling; Buserelin; Collagen; Collagen Type I; Endometriosis; Estradiol; Female; Goserelin; Humans; Hydroxyproline; Leiomyoma; Osteocalcin; Peptides; Retrospective Studies