goserelin and Erectile-Dysfunction

It is not known whether short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before and during radiotherapy improves cancer control and overall survival among patients with early, localized prostate adenocarcinoma.. From 1994 through 2001, we randomly assigned 1979 eligible patients with stage T1b, T1c, T2a, or T2b prostate adenocarcinoma and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 20 ng per milliliter or less to radiotherapy alone (992 patients) or radiotherapy with 4 months of total androgen suppression starting 2 months before radiotherapy (radiotherapy plus short-term ADT, 987 patients). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included disease-specific mortality, distant metastases, biochemical failure (an increasing level of PSA), and the rate of positive findings on repeat prostate biopsy at 2 years.. The median follow-up period was 9.1 years. The 10-year rate of overall survival was 62% among patients receiving radiotherapy plus short-term ADT (the combined-therapy group), as compared with 57% among patients receiving radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for death with radiotherapy alone, 1.17; P=0.03). The addition of short-term ADT was associated with a decrease in the 10-year disease-specific mortality from 8% to 4% (hazard ratio for radiotherapy alone, 1.87; P=0.001). Biochemical failure, distant metastases, and the rate of positive findings on repeat prostate biopsy at 2 years were significantly improved with radiotherapy plus short-term ADT. Acute and late radiation-induced toxic effects were similar in the two groups. The incidence of grade 3 or higher hormone-related toxic effects was less than 5%. Reanalysis according to risk showed reductions in overall and disease-specific mortality primarily among intermediate-risk patients, with no significant reductions among low-risk patients.. Among patients with stage T1b, T1c, T2a, or T2b prostate adenocarcinoma and a PSA level of 20 ng per milliliter or less, the use of short-term ADT for 4 months before and during radiotherapy was associated with significantly decreased disease-specific mortality and increased overall survival. According to post hoc risk analysis, the benefit was mainly seen in intermediate-risk, but not low-risk, men. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; RTOG 94-08 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00002597.).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Erectile Dysfunction; Flutamide; Follow-Up Studies; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Risk; Survival Rate

To determine the acceptability of short term neo-adjuvant maximal androgen deprivation (MAD) to patients treated with external beam radiation for locally advanced prostate cancer.. Between 1996 and 2000, 818 patients with locally advanced, but non-metastatic, prostate cancer were entered into a randomised clinical trial (TROG 96.01), which compared radiation treatment alone with the same radiation treatment and 3 or 6 months neo-adjuvant MAD with goserelin and flutamide. Relevant symptoms, and how troublesome they were to the patient, were scored using a self-assessment questionnaire. This was completed by the patient at registration, and at specified times during and after treatment. Patients taking flutamide had liver function tests checked at regular intervals.. All patients have completed at least 12 months follow-up after treatment. Nearly all patients completed planned treatment with goserelin, but 27% of patients in the 6-month MAD treatment arm, and 20% in the 3-month arm, had to stop flutamide early. This was mainly due to altered liver function (up to 17% patients) and bowel side effects (up to 8% patients). However, although flutamide resulted in more bowel symptoms for patients on MAD, there was significant reduction in some urinary symptoms on this treatment. Acute bowel and urinary side effects at the end of radiation treatment were similar in all treatment arms. Side effect severity was unrelated to radiation target volume size, which was reduced by MAD, but symptomatology prior to any treatment was a powerful predictor. Of the 36% of patients who were sexually active before any treatment, the majority became inactive whilst on MAD. However, sexual activity at 12 months after radiation treatment was similar in all treatment arms, indicating that the effects of short term MAD on sexual function are reversible.. Despite temporary effects on sexual activity, and compliance difficulties with flutamide, short-term neo-adjuvant MAD was not perceived by patients to be a major inconvenience. If neo-adjuvant MAD in the way tested can be demonstrated to lead to improved biochemical control and/or survival, then patients would view these therapeutic gains as worthwhile. Compliance with short-term goserelin was excellent, confirming that LH-RH analogues have a potential role in more long-term adjuvant treatment. However, for more protracted androgen deprivation, survival advantages and deleterious effects need to be assessed in parallel, in order to determine the optimal duration of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Erectile Dysfunction; Flutamide; Goserelin; Humans; Intestines; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder

To compare the efficacy of bicalutamide monotherapy to maximal androgen blockade (MAB) in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer.. Previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage C or D disease (American Urological Association Staging System) were randomly allocated to receive either bicalutamide or MAB. After disease progression, patients treated with bicalutamide were assigned to castration. The primary end point for this trial was overall survival. Secondary end points included response to treatment, disease progression, treatment safety, quality-of-life (QOL), and sexual function.. A total of 108 patients received bicalutamide and 112 received MAB. There was no difference in the percentage of patients whose prostate-specific antigen returned to normal levels. At the time of the present analysis (median follow-up time, 38 months; range, 1 to 60 months), 129 patients progressed and 89 died. There was no difference in the duration of either progression-free survival or overall survival. However, a survival trend favored bicalutamide in stage C disease but MAB in stage D disease. Overall and subgroup trends were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were more common in patients receiving MAB (P =.08 and P =.04, respectively). Fewer patients in the bicalutamide group complained of loss of libido (P =. 01) and of erectile dysfunction (P =.002). Significant trends favored bicalutamide-treated patients also with respect to their QOL, namely relative to social functioning, vitality, emotional well-being, and physical capacity.. Bicalutamide monotherapy yielded comparable results relative to standard treatment with MAB, induced fewer side effects, and produced a better QOL.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Consumer Product Safety; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Erectile Dysfunction; Flutamide; Goserelin; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Survival Rate; Tosyl Compounds

Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Erectile Dysfunction; Flutamide; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testis; Testosterone

In this study, we aimed to compare changes in cavernosal tissues in rats with antiandrogen treatment and orchiectomy. A total of 42 Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Group I, control group, Group II, LH-RH was given for 1 month, Group III-LH-RH + Bicalutamide was given for 1 month, and Group IV was defined as orchiectomy and followed up for 1 month. Measurements of intracavernosal pressure with different electrical stimuli and pathological findings of smooth muscle collagen in cavernosal tissues were examined. While the cavernosal pressure response in all the different electrical stimuli given in the control group and in all other groups was significantly lower than that in the other groups, it was statistically significant at 7.5 and 10 V (p = .005, p < 0001). According to the pathologic evaluation, the density of tissue collagen increased significantly in the other groups according to the control group. In groups 3 and 4, the density of 4+ collagen was found to be increased according to Groups 1 and 2. In the LH-RH alone group, it appears that there are no 4+ colloid density and less damage. According to these findings, the negative effect of LH-RH treatment on cavernosal tissues appears to be less.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Collagen; Disease Models, Animal; Erectile Dysfunction; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Male; Muscle, Smooth; Nitriles; Orchiectomy; Penis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Tosyl Compounds

(1) Goserelin, a GnRH agonist, has a new licensed indication in France, as an adjuvant to external radiotherapy for locally advanced prosate cancer. (2) The clinical file in this indication includes two trials of satisfactory methodological quality comparing radiotherapy + goserelin with radiotherapy alone. (3) In these trials the radiotherapy + goserelin combination increased the specific-symptom-free survival time. (4) In one trial goserelin caused endocrine disorders in 19% of patients. There were also more cases of urinary incontinence (13% in absolute values) among patients receiving the radiotherapy + goserelin combination. Furthermore, goserelin almost always causes impotence and reduced libido.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endocrine System Diseases; Erectile Dysfunction; France; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Libido; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence