mometasone-furoate and Sleep-Apnea--Obstructive

This study was designed to investigate the clinical effect of montelukast sodium combined with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).One hundred ninety-five children were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: groups A, B, and C; the group A (oral use of montelukast sodium), group B (nasal spray of mometasone furoate), and group C (oral use of montelukast sodium + nasal spray of mometasone furoate). Telephone questionnaire surveys were carried out. Polysomnography monitoring was performed and lateral x-ray radiographs of the cervical spine were taken before treatment and at 12 weeks after treatment. The improvement of clinical symptoms after treatment and its effective rate were analyzed. The difference in clinical characteristics between groups C1 and C2 was analyzed.In the 3 groups, clinical symptoms improved at 12 weeks after treatment compared with before (P < .05 or P < .01). Apnea-hypopnea index value decreased (P < .05) and minimal SaO2 increased (P < .05), while adenoidal/nasopharyngeal ratio was reduced (P < .05). Compared with groups A and B, group C had a shortened response duration of snoring, apnea, and restless sleep (P < .05). Differences in the response duration of buccal respiration and hyperhidrosis were not statistically significant (P > .05). The total effective rate was higher in group C than in A and B (P < .05), while the differences in all indices between groups A and B were not statistically significant (P > .05). The difference in the grade of the size of the tonsil between groups C1 and C2 was statistically significant (P < .05).The total effective rate of the combined treatment was higher than that of the single use of any of the 2 drugs, which allowed the rapid relief of symptoms. Drug treatment may have a poor curative effect in the treatment of OSAS patients with ≥ grade 3 tonsil hypertrophy.

Topics: Acetates; Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cervical Vertebrae; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Sprays; Polysomnography; Quinolines; Respiratory System Agents; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Sulfides; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

The use of non-surgical treatment for childhood obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is gaining popularity, especially in children with mild disease.. To test the hypothesis that intranasal corticosteroids reduce disease severity in children with mild OSA.. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) versus placebo in children aged 6 to 18 years with mild OSA. The primary outcome was the change from baseline obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI), as documented by overnight polysomnography, after four months of treatment.. Sixty-two children were recruited but 12 dropped out. This left 24 and 26 children for final analysis in the MF and placebo group, respectively. The OAHI and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) improved significantly in the MF group only. The OAHI decreased from 2.7 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.3 in the MF group, but increased from 2.5 ± 0.2 to 2.9 ± 0.6 in the placebo group (p = 0.039). The mean changes in ODI in the MF group and placebo group were -0.6 ± 0.5 and +0.7 ± 0.4, respectively (p = 0.037).. Four months of treatment with intranasal mometasone furoate effectively reduces the severity of mild OSA in children.

Topics: Adenoids; Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Mometasone Furoate; Palatine Tonsil; Polysomnography; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is characterized by repeated episodes of reduction in airflow due to the collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcome, side effects, and cost of treatment between modafinil and intranasal mometasone furoate in patients with OSAHS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with OSAHS (N=250) were divided into two groups: the modafinil group (MG) (N=125) were treated with 100 mg modafinil twice a day; the intranasal mometasone furoate group (IMFG) (N=125) were treated with 100 µg of intranasal mometasone furoate in the evening. Quality of life, grading of OSAHS, plain-film radiography, the adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio (AN ratio), side effects, cost of treatment, and beneficial effects after discontinuation of treatment were evaluated for all patients. RESULTS Duration of sleep apnea was significantly reduced in the IMFG compared with the MG (p=0.0145, q=9.262). Modafinil and intranasal mometasone furoate both had moderate effects on improvement of the OSAHS score. The IMFG showed a significantly greater beneficial effect on the AN ratio when compared with the MG (p=0.0001, q=6.584). No adverse events of treatment with modafinil and intranasal mometasone furoate were reported. Cost of treatment and beneficial effect after discontinuation were both significantly greater for the IMFG compared with the MG. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this preliminary clinical study were that for patients diagnosed with OSAHS, night-time treatment with intranasal mometasone furoate was more effective than modafinil.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Female; Humans; Male; Modafinil; Mometasone Furoate; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

To explore the treatment methods of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).. A total of 386 children with OSAHS were enrolled from June 2008 to April 2011.Ninety children with adenoid and tonsil ≤ degree III (group A) were randomly divided into A1 subgroup and A2 subgroup, while 22 of 296 (group B) children aged less than 3 years old with degree IV adenoid and(or) tonsil were divided into B1 subgroup, and the other 274 of 296 children with degree IV adenoid and (or) tonsil were divided into B1 subgroup, B2 subgroup and B3 subgroup. The adenoid, tonsil size examination and nasal endoscopic examination scores were performed before treatment, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Drug therapy included oral antibiotics, mometasone furoate as a nasal spray, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRAs), mucoactive medications. Conservative treatment meant drug therapy plus negative pressure of sputum aspiration.Surgical treatment meant coblation adenotonsillectomy. A1 subgroup received drug therapy for 3 months; A2 and B1 subgroup received conservative treatment for 3 months; B2 subgroup received coblation adenotonsillectomy after 3 days conservative treatment and postoperative drug therapy for 2 weeks; B3 subgroup received coblation adenotonsillectomy after 2 weeks conservative treatment and postoperative drug therapy for 3 months.. The adenoid and tonsil size of A2 subgroup decreased at 3 months after treatment (Wald χ² were 10.584 and 8.366, respectively, P < 0.05), no significant re-increase was found at 6 months, and no decrease was found in the A1 subgroup (P > 0.05). The nasal endoscopic examination scores decreased in both A1 and A2 subgroup at 3 months after the treatment (F = 403.420, P < 0.05), but it was found re-increase in A1 subgroup at the 6 months (P < 0.05), no significant re-increase was found in the A2 subgroup. The polysomnography (PSG) monitor of A2 subgroup was 100.0% normal at 3 months after treatment, while the A1 subgroup was only 43.2% (χ² = 36.189, P < 0.05). B2 and B3 subgroups cured after coblation adenotonsillectomy, but no decrease of the adenoid and tonsil size was found in B1 subgroup (P > 0.05). The nasal endoscopic examination scores of B1, B2 and B3 subgroups showed significant decrease after the treatment, but re-increase was found in both B1 and B2 subgroups at the 6 months (F = 1 614.244, P < 0.05), no significant re-increase was found in the B3 subgroup. The PSG monitor of B3 subgroup was 100.0% normal at 3 months after treatment, B2 subgroup 73.4%, and B1 subgroup only 57.4% (χ² = 90.846, P < 0.05).. The treatment method of children with OSAHS should be selected according to the age, condition of disease, and size of the adenoid and tonsil. Adenoid and tonsil ≤ degree III should select conservative treatment; while for degree IV adenoid and (or) tonsil, surgical treatment should be primary choice. Conservative treatment can reduce the risk of perioperative and adequate postoperative drug therapy can help prevent recurrence after surgery.

Topics: Adenoidectomy; Adenoids; Child; Humans; Mometasone Furoate; Palatine Tonsil; Polysomnography; Pregnadienediols; Recurrence; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Tonsillectomy