mometasone-furoate and Sneezing

mometasone-furoate has been researched along with Sneezing* in 4 studies

Trials

3 trial(s) available for mometasone-furoate and Sneezing

ArticleYear
Preference evaluation and perceived sensory comparison of fluticasone furoate and mometasone furoate intranasal sprays in allergic rhinitis.
    Auris, nasus, larynx, 2016, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Intranasal corticosteroid sprays (INCSs) are commonly used for therapy of allergic rhinitis (AR). Adherence to regular use of INCSs is influenced by patient perception and preferences of products. The study objective was to compare perceived sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) and mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in AR patients.. In a multicenter, randomized, crossover, prospective study, 40 seasonal AR patients were administered both FFNS and MFNS for 2 weeks each in a crossover fashion, for a total of 4 weeks. Patients completed questionnaires for each product regarding perceived sensory attributes at the end of each two-week period of product administration.. FFNS was significantly preferred over MFNS. Significantly, fewer subjects perceived a bitter taste (p=0.01), medication running down their throat (p=0.033), and medication running out of their nose (p=0.002) with FFNS. MFNS was more frequently reported to induce nasal irritation (p=0.012), sneezing (p=0.017), and rhinorrhea (p=0.007) compared to FFNS. Interestingly, these findings were markedly observed in females. Medicine dripping out of the nose and nasal shooting were the most common problems reported for MFNS with a higher proportion of subjects who felt moderate-to-severe discomfort. Overall, 52.5% of patients expressed a preference for FFNS compared with 22.5% for MFNS.. Several perceived sensory attributes of FFNS were rated significantly superior to MFNS. FFNS may contribute to enhanced treatment outcomes in AR patients due to improved treatment adherence.

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Sprays; Patient Preference; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Sex Factors; Sneezing; Surveys and Questionnaires; Taste

2016
Relief of cough and nasal symptoms associated with allergic rhinitis by mometasone furoate nasal spray.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003, Volume: 90, Issue:4

    Cough commonly occurs as a symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), an inflammatory condition of the nasal mucous membranes that results in rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness/congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing. Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS, Nasonex, Schering, Kenilworth, NJ), an anti-inflammatory nasal corticosteroid, has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing the nasal inflammation of SAR.. To examine the effectiveness of MFNS in relieving SAR-associated cough, in addition to nasal symptoms.. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Patients 12 years of age or older with > or = 1-year history of SAR symptoms, positive skin test to a prevailing seasonal allergen, moderate nasal symptoms, and moderate cough were treated for 14 days with MFNS 200 microg daily (n = 122) or placebo (n = 123).. The group treated with MFNS showed significant improvement in the daytime cough severity score at endpoint compared with placebo (P = 0.049). Improvement in the nighttime cough severity score showed a trend in favor of MFNS treatment. Treatment with MFNS significantly improved total nasal symptoms in both the daytime and nighttime compared with placebo at endpoint (P < or = 0.017). Overall daytime symptom scores (cough + total nasal) improved significantly compared with placebo at endpoint (P = 0.005). Overall nighttime symptom scores improved significantly compared with placebo at endpoint (P = 0.028). Treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events.. MFNS is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of daytime cough associated with SAR.

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Cough; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Decongestants; Nasal Obstruction; Pregnadienediols; Pruritus; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Safety; Sneezing; Treatment Outcome

2003
Effect of mometasone furoate on early and late phase inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1998, Volume: 81, Issue:5

    Mometasone furoate is a potent glucocorticoid that can markedly inhibit proinflammatory Th2 cytokines in vitro. An aqueous nasal spray formulation has been shown to be clinically active in reducing the symptoms of perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis.. To determine whether pretreatment with mometasone furoate 200 microg once daily decreases specific indices of early and late phase nasal inflammation compared with placebo.. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted using nasal provocation with ragweed antigen in 21 patients with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis out of the ragweed season; the treatment period was 2 weeks. Symptom scores, rhinoprobe cytology, and nasal lavage fluid were collected during early and late phase periods for nasal cytokines (interleukin, 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8) and leukotriene B4 determinations using ELISA and RIA.. Mean nasal symptom scores and sneezing frequency were consistently lower with mometasone furoate compared with placebo. Treatment was associated with a statistically significant early phase (30-minute time point) reduction in nasal lavage histamine levels compared with placebo (14.3 versus 20.2 ng/mL, P = .02). Within-treatment comparisons suggested that mometasone furoate reduced the antigen-induced late-phase response for IL-6, IL-8, and eosinophils compared with pretreatment. There were similar, but smaller, changes seen in the placebo group for these measurements. There were no statistically significant changes following antigen challenge in IL-1, IL-4, IL-5, LTB4, or in other nasal cytology parameters.. These results suggest that the clinical activity of mometasone furoate nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis is likely due, in part, to a reduction in the levels of histamine in nasal secretions related to the early phase response, and reductions in IL-6, IL-8, and eosinophils during the late phase response.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Provocation Tests; Pregnadienediols; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Sneezing; Time Factors

1998

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for mometasone-furoate and Sneezing

ArticleYear
Genomic and non-genomic effects of glucocorticoids on allergic rhinitis model in mice.
    International immunopharmacology, 2013, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Glucocorticoids (GCs) are well known for their anti-inflammatory effects, which are elicited through a transcriptional mechanism via a cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor (cGR)-mediated genomic effect. However, recent in vitro studies report that GCs can act as a membrane glucocorticoid receptor (mGR). This study aimed to examine whether mometasone furoate (MF) influences the nasal symptoms induced by histamine, substance P, ATP. Furthermore, the influences of various compounds on MF action were studied in vivo. The mice were intranasally administered with nasal symptom-inciting agents, and the occurrences of sneezing and nasal rubbing were counted. MF repressed the nasal symptoms caused when it was administered 10, 30 and 60min before the induction of nasal symptoms. The repressive effect observed 10min after the administration of MF was inhibited by RU486, a GR antagonist, but not by actinomycin D, a transcriptional inhibitor. In contrast, the repressive effect observed 60min after the administration of MF was inhibited by RU486 and actinomycin D. Therefore, the effects observed 10 and 60min after the MF administration were classified as non-genomic and genomic effects, respectively. The non-genomic effect suppressed the nasal symptoms induced by m-3M3FBS, a phospholipase C (PLC) activator, and was inhibited by U-73122, a PLC inhibitor. The genomic effect was inhibited by N-(p-amylcinnamoyl) anthranilic acid, a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) inhibitor. These results indicate that MF has a non-genomic effect through repression of the activation of PLC via the mGR, and MF has also a genomic effect that was influenced by the inhibition of PLA2 through transcriptional regulation via cGR.

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cinnamates; Disease Models, Animal; Estrenes; Female; Genomics; Glucocorticoids; Histamine; Hormone Antagonists; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mifepristone; Mometasone Furoate; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Phospholipase A2 Inhibitors; Pregnadienediols; Pyrrolidinones; Receptors, Glucocorticoid; Rhinitis, Allergic; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Sneezing; Substance P; Type C Phospholipases

2013