travoprost and dorzolamide-timolol-combination

Modern fixed-combination products simplify medication dose regimen without sacrificing their effectiveness.Potential benefits of the therapy with fixed-combination products are enhanced tolerability increased convenience,better compliance,cost and time economy and removal of the wash out effect. Regarding intraocular pressure lowering effect, fixed-combination agents are superior to monotherapy with the two medication components, with the exception of Duotrav that is not superior to travoprost action.Fixed-combination products are noninferior to concomitant administration of the two components of medication (nonfixed-combination agents) relative to their ocular hypotensive efficacy with the exception of Ganfort that is however inferior to concurrent administration of both the bimatoprost and timolol.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Brimonidine Tartrate, Timolol Maleate Drug Combination; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cloprostenol; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated the effects of acetazolamide, latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, brimonidine, brinzolamide, and timolol on pain during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.. This prospective randomized comparative study included 323 eyes of 323 patients with no history of intraocular surgery or chronic eye disease who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery and foldable intraocular lens implantation under topical anesthesia. Patients were divided into 8 groups according to the preoperative prophylactic intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication. The intraoperative pain was assessed postoperatively using a visual analog pain scale. The Kruskal-Wallis test investigated the differences in the visual analog pain-scale scores of the groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test investigated the pairwise comparison of the groups.. The median visual analog pain-scale score of the group that did not receive any IOP-lowering medication was 2.0±1.89. The brimonidine group exhibited the lowest visual analog pain-scale scores, and the prostanoids, especially the bimatoprost group, demonstrated the highest visual analog pain-scale scores (median±standard deviation were 0.0±1.50 and 2.0±1.91, respectively). The median visual analog pain-scale scores of the acetazolamide, latanoprost, travoprost, brinzolamide, and timolol groups were 0.0±1.62, 2.0±1.67, 2.0±1.73, 0.0±1.66, and 1.0±1.54, respectively. A pairwise comparison using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction revealed significant differences between the groups of acetozolamide and travoprost (p=0.001), acetozolamide and bimatoprost (p<0.001), travoprost and brimonidine (p<0.001), bimatoprost and brimonidine (p<0.001), and bimatoprost and timolol (p=0.001).. Prophylactic application of the IOP-lowering medication may alter the pain sensation during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Topics: Acetazolamide; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Brimonidine Tartrate; Cataract; Cloprostenol; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Phacoemulsification; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost

To determine the adjunctive 24-h efficacy obtained with brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol fixed combinations (FCs) in open-angle glaucoma patients insufficiently controlled on travoprost monotherapy.. Prospective, observer-masked, active controlled, crossover, comparison. Qualified primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg at 10:00 on travoprost monotherapy were randomized for 3 months to either brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol FC therapy adjunct to travoprost. Patients were then crossed-over to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. At baseline and at the end of each treatment period, the patients underwent 24-h IOP monitoring.. Fifty patients completed the study. The mean 24-h baseline IOP on travoprost monotherapy was 20.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.6, 20.7 mm Hg]. Both adjunctive FC therapies significantly reduced the IOP at each time point and for the mean 24-h IOP (P<0.001) compared with travoprost monotherapy. Brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower mean 24-h IOP (17.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: 16.4, 17.9 mm Hg) than brimonidine/timolol FC (18.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: 17.3, 18.8 mm Hg) (P<0.001). For all the 3 timepoints between 18:00 and 02:00, the brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower IOP than the brimonidine/timolol FC (P≤0.036). For the other 3 timepoints, no significant differences were detected.. This study demonstrated that both FCs provide statistically and clinically significant incremental 24-h IOP lowering to travoprost monotherapy. The brinzolamide/timolol FC however achieves a better mean 24-h IOP control owing to the greater efficacy in late afternoon and during the night.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Brimonidine Tartrate; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Timolol; Travoprost

The combination of anti-glaucoma eye drops is frequently used in clinical treatment, and it is known that the combination can cause corneal damage. Recently, an anti-glaucoma combination eye drops is developed, and the treatment by the combination eye drops is expected to enhance quality of life. However, effects of the combination eye drops on corneal epithelial cell damage have not been clarified. In this study, we investigated the corneal epithelial cell damage of commercially available anti-glaucoma combination eye drops, such as Xalacom® (latanoprost/timolol maleate combination eye drops), Duotrav® (travoprost/timolol maleate combination eye drops) and Cosopt® (dorzolamide hydrochloride/timolol maleate combination eye drops) using the human corneal epithelial cell (HCE-T). The cytotoxicity in Xalacom® was higher than that in Xalatan® (eye drops containing latanoprost) and Timoptol® (eye drops containing timolol maleate), and the benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and timolol maleate were related to cytotoxicity in Xalacom®. The cytotoxicity in Duotrav® and Cosopt® was lower than that in Timoptol®. The Duotrav® is preserved with a non-BAC system (POLYQUAD, polidronium chloride). Therefore, it was suggested that the POLYQUAD related to the low cytotoxicity in Duotrav®. On the other hand, the D-mannitol reduced the cytotoxicity by BAC in this study. This result suggested that the cytotoxicity in Cosopt® was reduced by D-mannitol. The Duotrav® and Cosopt® may be less damaging to the ocular surface of glaucoma patients receiving long-term eye drop therapy in compared with the combination of anti-glaucoma eye drops.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Cells, Cultured; Cloprostenol; Cornea; Drug Combinations; Epithelial Cells; Glaucoma; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Latanoprost; Mannitol; Ophthalmic Solutions; Polymers; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost

To compare the effectiveness and associated costs of travoprost versus a fixed combination of dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma according to data collected by the United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database (UK-GPRD).. Patients with a diagnosis of ocular hypertension, glaucoma, or who had been treated topically by surgery or laser therapy were selected. Patients starting first-line treatment with travoprost or a fixed dorzolamide + timolol combination were included. Times to treatment failure were compared with an adjusted Cox model.. Cost and treatment failure defined as a prescription change (adding or removing a topical treatment, or initiating laser therapy or surgery).. 56 612 patients were extracted from the database and 39 808 patients received at least one topical prescription for IOP-lowering (intraocular pressure) therapy. Of these, 639 were treated with travoprost and 387 with dorzolamide + timolol, as first-line therapies. No significant difference was found between patient characteristics. Patients were aged 70.0 years and 48.5% were male. At 1 year, treatment failure was experienced by 30.4% of patients receiving travoprost and 49.4% receiving dorzolamide + timolol (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for failure was 0.79 (p < 0.03) less with travoprost, after adjusting on age, gender, comorbidities and duration of follow-up. Adjusted annual costs of glaucoma management were significantly (p < 0.001) lower with travoprost ( pound198.31) than with dorzolamide + timolol ( pound312.21).. This retrospective costs and consequences analysis study showed that travoprost is more efficient than dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma patients. Patients continued longer with first-line treatment when prescribed travoprost at a lower cost.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Cloprostenol; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Databases, Factual; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Male; Physicians, Family; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost; United Kingdom