Page last updated: 2024-11-12

lurasidone hydrochloride

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Lurasidone Hydrochloride: A thiazole derivative and atypical ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENT that functions as a DOPAMINE D2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; SEROTONIN 5-HT2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, serotonin 5-HT7 receptor antagonist, and antagonist of the adrenergic α2A and α2C receptors, as well as a partial SEROTONIN 5-HT1A RECEPTOR AGONIST. It is used in the treatment of SCHIZOPHRENIA and BIPOLAR DISORDER. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

lurasidone hydrochloride : A hydrochloride obtained by reaction of lurasidone with one equivalent of hydrochloric acid. An atypical antipsychotic agent used for the treatment of schizophrenia. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID11237860
CHEMBL ID1615372
CHEBI ID70732
SCHEMBL ID1534132
MeSH IDM000604584

Synonyms (53)

Synonym
latuda (tn)
sm 13496
367514-88-3
lurasidone hydrochloride (jan/usan)
D04820
mk-3756
smp-13496
lurasidone hydrochloride
latuda
sm-13496
lurasidone-d8 hydrochloride
EX-3125
lurasidone hcl
chebi:70732 ,
CHEMBL1615372
unii-o0p4i5851i
lurasidone hydrochloride [usan]
o0p4i5851i ,
4,7-methano-1h-isoindole-1,3(2h)-dione, 2-(((1r,2r)-2-((4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)-1-piperazinyl)methyl)cyclohexyl)methyl)hexahydro-, monohydrochloride, (3ar,4s,7r,7as)-
lurasidone hydrochloride [mart.]
lurasidone hydrochloride [who-dd]
lurasidone hydrochloride [mi]
lurasidone hydrochloride [orange book]
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-((1r,2r)-2-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-ylmethyl)cyclohexylmethyl)hexahydro-4,7-methano-2h-isoindole-1,3-dione, hydrochloride
lurasidone hydrochloride [vandf]
lurasidone hydrochloride [jan]
4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)-1-{[(1r,2r)-2-{[(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-1,3-dioxooctahydro-2h-4,7-methanoisoindol-2-yl]methyl}cyclohexyl]methyl}piperazin-1-ium chloride
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-{[(1r,2r)-2-{[4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl}cyclohexyl]methyl}hexahydro-1h-4,7-methanoisoindole-1,3(2h)-dione hydrochloride
lurasidone monohydrochloride
S3044
AKOS022185856
SCHEMBL1534132
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-{(1r,2r)-2-[4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-ylmethyl]cyclohexylmethyl}hexahydro-4,7-methano-2h-isoindole-1,3-dione hydrochloride
NEKCRUIRPWNMLK-SCIYSFAVSA-N
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-[(1r,2r)-2-[4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-ylmethyl]cyclohexylmethyl]hexahydro-1h-4,7-methanoisoindole-1,3-dione hydrochloride
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-(((1r,2r)-2-((4-(benzo[d]isothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)cyclohexyl)methyl)hexahydro-1h-4,7-methanoisoindole-1,3(2h)-dione hydrochloride
lurasidonhydrochloride
hcl, lurasidone
hydrochloride, lurasidone
sm-13496 (hydrochloride)
lurasidone hydrochloride, >=98% (hplc)
(1r,2s,6r,7s)-4-{[(1r,2r)-2-{[4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl}cyclohexyl]methyl}-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.0^{2,6}]decane-3,5-dione hydrochloride
Q27882070
AS-35074
(1s,2r,6s,7r)-4-[[(1r,2r)-2-[[4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl]cyclohexyl]methyl]-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]decane-3,5-dione;hydrochloride
DTXSID401027714
lurasidone hydrochloride (mart.)
4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)-1-(((1r,2r)-2-(((3ar,4s,7r,7as)-1,3-dioxooctahydro-2h-4,7-methanoisoindol-2-yl)methyl)cyclohexyl)methyl)piperazin-1-ium chloride
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-(((1r,2r)-2-((4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)cyclohexyl)methyl)hexahydro-1h-4,7-methanoisoindole-1,3(2h)-dione hydrochloride
(3ar,4s,7r,7as)-2-((1r,2r)-2-(4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-ylmethyl)cyclohexylmethyl)hexahydro-4,7-methano-2h-isoindole-1,3-dione monohydrochloride
Z3241270511
EN300-7409921
(1r,2s,6r,7s)-4-{[(1r,2r)-2-{[4-(1,2-benzothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl}cyclohexyl]methyl}-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.0,2,6]decane-3,5-dione hydrochloride

Research Excerpts

Overview

Lurasidone hydrochloride is an atypical antipsychotic. It is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lurasidone hydrochloride is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. "( Lurasidone: an atypical antipsychotic for schizophrenia.
Fuller, MA; Lee, JR; Risbood, V; Roche-Desilets, J,
)
1.57

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The most common adverse events in the clinical trials were somnolence (broadly defined), akathisia, nausea, parkinsonism and agitation."( Lurasidone for schizophrenia: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved second-generation antipsychotic.
Citrome, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Doses above 80 mg/day do not appear to confer added benefit and may be associated with a dose-related increase in certain adverse reactions."( Lurasidone for schizophrenia: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved second-generation antipsychotic.
Citrome, L, 2011
)
0.37
"7%); the proportion who discontinued due to adverse events was similar (10."( Double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of lurasidone and ziprasidone in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Cucchiaro, J; Loebel, A; Ogasa, M; Potkin, SG, 2011
)
0.37
" Outcome measures included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, ECG, and laboratory tests."( Long-term safety and tolerability of lurasidone in schizophrenia: a 12-month, double-blind, active-controlled study.
Citrome, L; Cucchiaro, J; Loebel, A; Phillips, D; Sarma, K; Silva, R; Tsuchiya, S, 2012
)
0.38
" In this context, newer SGAs were developed to further improve the adverse effect burden of available agents."( Body weight and metabolic adverse effects of asenapine, iloperidone, lurasidone and paliperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.
Correll, CU; De Hert, M; Detraux, J; Sweers, K; van Winkel, R; Yu, W, 2012
)
0.38
"Lurasidone 80 mg and 160 mg doses administered once-daily in the evening, were safe and effective treatments for subjects with acute schizophrenia, with increased response rates observed at the higher dose."( Efficacy and safety of lurasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, C; Kalali, AH; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Potkin, SG; Sarma, K; Xu, L, 2013
)
0.39
"7%) discontinued due to an adverse event (AE) during OL treatment."( Long-term safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in schizophrenia: a 22-month, open-label extension study.
Correll, CU; Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Silva, R, 2016
)
0.43
" The most common adverse events (incidence ≥5% in either lurasidone dose group and at least twice the rate of placebo) for lurasidone 40 mg/day, 80 mg/day, and placebo, respectively, were nausea (12."( Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Adolescents with Schizophrenia: A 6-Week, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.
Cucchiaro, J; Deng, L; Findling, RL; Goldman, R; Loebel, A, 2017
)
0.46
"7% in the placebo group; discontinuation rates due to adverse events were the same for the 2 groups (1."( Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Depression: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Cucchiaro, J; DelBello, MP; Deng, L; Goldman, R; Loebel, A; Phillips, D, 2017
)
0.46
"3% due to adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of lurasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in Asian patients: Results of a 26-week open-label extension study.
Hagi, K; Higuchi, T; Ishigooka, J; Iyo, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Key words: Bipolar I depression; Lurasidone; Meta-analysis; Remission rates; Adverse effect."( Efficacy and safety of lurasidone versus placebo as adjunctive to mood stabilizers in bipolar I depression: A meta-analysis.
Wang, GH; Wang, H; Wang, HL; Xiao, L, 2020
)
0.56
" Other outcomes were discontinuation rates and incidence of individual adverse events."( Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of lurasidone for acute schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 trials in Japan.
Iwata, N; Kishi, T; Nosaka, T; Okuya, M; Sakuma, K, 2020
)
0.56
"7% due to adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in adolescents with schizophrenia: results of a 2-year, open-label extension study.
Correll, CU; Deng, L; Findling, RL; Goldman, R; Pikalov, A; Tocco, M, 2022
)
0.72
" For lurasidone (combined doses), three adverse events occurred with a frequency of ≥5% (nausea: 13."( Efficacy and safety of lurasidone in adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia: A pooled post hoc analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week studies.
Calisti, F; Cattaneo, A; Costamagna, I; Goldman, R; Hsu, J; Pikalov, A; Tocco, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Available safety outcomes included discontinuations (all-cause, lack of efficacy, adverse events), metabolic parameters (weight change, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose), changes in prolactin, and somnolence."( Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Youths With Bipolar Depression.
DelBello, MP; Hagi, K; Heller, V; Kadakia, A; Loebel, A; Nosaka, T; Singh, R, 2022
)
0.72
"We conducted a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone (LUR) to examine the difference in the risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events (AEs) between depressive disorders (bipolar depression and major depressive disorders) and schizophrenia."( Differences in the incidence of lurasidone adverse events between depressive disorders and schizophrenia in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials: a meta-analysis.
Iwata, N; Kishi, T; Nakamura, H, 2021
)
0.62
" The three most common adverse events for TN and TP patients, respectively, were headache (26."( Long-term safety and effectiveness of open-label lurasidone in antipsychotic-Naïve versus previously treated adolescents with Schizophrenia: A post-hoc analysis.
Correll, CU; Goldman, R; Hsu, J; Pikalov, A; Tocco, M, 2022
)
0.72
" These data indicate that lurasidone is a safe and efficacious treatment option for treatment-naïve youth with schizophrenia, who are generally most sensitive to antipsychotic adverse effects."( Long-term safety and effectiveness of open-label lurasidone in antipsychotic-Naïve versus previously treated adolescents with Schizophrenia: A post-hoc analysis.
Correll, CU; Goldman, R; Hsu, J; Pikalov, A; Tocco, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Adverse events with a frequency ≥5% (and were greater than for combined lurasidone) were insomnia (11."( Efficacy and safety of lurasidone in schizophrenia: pooled analysis of European results from double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week studies.
Calabrese, M; Calisti, F; Cattaneo, A; Goldman, R; Mao, Y; Pikalov, A; Tocco, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Our study investigated the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and the pharmacodynamic CHEMBL database to further characterize TGA-induced ICDs."( Impulse Control Disorders by Dopamine Partial Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance-Pharmacodynamic Assessment Through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
De Ponti, F; Fusaroli, M; Giunchi, V; Menchetti, M; Poluzzi, E; Raschi, E; Rimondini Giorgini, R, 2022
)
0.72
"We downloaded and pre-processed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System up to December 2020."( Impulse Control Disorders by Dopamine Partial Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance-Pharmacodynamic Assessment Through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
De Ponti, F; Fusaroli, M; Giunchi, V; Menchetti, M; Poluzzi, E; Raschi, E; Rimondini Giorgini, R, 2022
)
0.72
" The changes in the depressive rating scale, remission/response rates, nervous system adverse events (NSAEs), gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs), metabolic parameters, and prolactin were compared between medication and placebo or among medications with the Cohen's d or number needed to treat/harm."( Efficacy and safety profiles of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics for bipolar depression: a systematic review.
Bai, Y; Cai, L; Chen, G; Yang, H, 2023
)
0.91
" Safety assessments included the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory assessments."( The efficacy and safety of lurasidone in bipolar I depression with and without rapid cycling: A pooled post-hoc analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Kato, M; Kato, T; Masuda, T; Sano, F, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The author provides the reader with knowledge of the fundamental pharmacokinetic characteristics and metabolic pathways of these new antipsychotics, emphasizing the clinically important common features and differences compared to other older agents."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism update for some recent antipsychotics.
Caccia, S, 2011
)
0.37
"Aripiprazole, perospirone, lurasidone and cariprazine share some of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of older, lipophilic antipsychotics and, like these, each has some distinct pharmacokinetic features that are clinically beneficial and some that are not."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism update for some recent antipsychotics.
Caccia, S, 2011
)
0.37
" After intravenous injection, systemic clearance, steady-state volumes of distribution and half-life remained unaltered as a function of dose with values in the range 22."( Pharmacokinetics of lurasidone, a novel atypical anti-psychotic drug, in rats.
Chae, YJ; Koo, TS; Lee, KR, 2011
)
0.37
"In Study 1, the geometric mean Cmax in the fasted state was 56."( Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone: results of two randomized, open-label, crossover studies.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, S, 2013
)
0.39
" The current study investigated whether the pharmacodynamic properties of lurasidone fit to a previously developed model which was the first to be derived on the basis of the strict combination of clinical and preclinical data with no input from theory or opinion."( The pharmacodynamic properties of lurasidone and their role in its antidepressant efficacy in bipolar disorder.
Akiskal, H; Fountoulakis, KN; Gazouli, M; Kelsoe, J, 2015
)
0.42
"This paper reviews the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of lurasidone from the perspective of clinical pharmacology and helps the clinician compare this drug with others from the same therapeutic class to aid in drug selection and use in specific situations."( How the pharmacokinetics and receptor-binding profile of lurasidone affect the clinical utility and safety of the drug in the treatment of schizophrenia.
Kazanchi, H; Macaluso, M; Preskorn, SH, 2015
)
0.42
"' In our review, particular attention was paid to those articles that reviewed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug and its efficacy and safety/tolerability based on data from registration trials."( How the pharmacokinetics and receptor-binding profile of lurasidone affect the clinical utility and safety of the drug in the treatment of schizophrenia.
Kazanchi, H; Macaluso, M; Preskorn, SH, 2015
)
0.42
" Additionally, this method was successfully used to estimate the in vivo plasma concentrations of lurasidone and ID-14283 obtained from a pharmacokinetic study in south Indian male subjects and the results were authenticated by conducting incurred samples reanalysis."( LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of lurasidone and its active metabolite, ID-14283 in human plasma and its application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Katteboina, MY; Mullangi, R; Pilli, NR; Satla, SR; Seelam, RR, 2016
)
0.43
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and tolerability of lurasidone in children and adolescents with a range of psychiatric disorders."( Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders.
Chiu, YY; Findling, RL; Goldman, R; Jin, F; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Silva, R, 2015
)
0.42
"87) for Cmax on day 10 or 12."( Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders.
Chiu, YY; Findling, RL; Goldman, R; Jin, F; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Silva, R, 2015
)
0.42
" Our study investigated the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and the pharmacodynamic CHEMBL database to further characterize TGA-induced ICDs."( Impulse Control Disorders by Dopamine Partial Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance-Pharmacodynamic Assessment Through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
De Ponti, F; Fusaroli, M; Giunchi, V; Menchetti, M; Poluzzi, E; Raschi, E; Rimondini Giorgini, R, 2022
)
0.72
" The current study investigated whether the pharmacodynamic properties of cariprazine fit into a previously developed model which was the first to be derived based on the strict combination of clinical and preclinical data."( Antidepressant efficacy of cariprazine in bipolar disorder and the role of its pharmacodynamic properties: A hypothesis based on data.
Fountoulakis, KN; Haarman, BCM; Ioannou, M; Tohen, M; Zarate, CA, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To evaluate potential drug-drug interactions with the atypical antipsychotic lurasidone."( Lurasidone drug-drug interaction studies: a comprehensive review.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, SH, 2014
)
0.4
" No dose adjustment for lurasidone is needed when administered with lithium or valproate."( Lurasidone drug-drug interaction studies: a comprehensive review.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, SH, 2014
)
0.4
"Auditory processing cognitive remediation combined with lurasidone did not lead to differential improvement over nonspecific video games."( A Multicenter, Rater-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study of Auditory Processing-Focused Cognitive Remediation Combined With Open-Label Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder.
Barch, DM; Bruder, G; Choo, T; Harvey, P; Kantrowitz, JT; Keefe, RS; Lee, S; Lieberman, JA; Medalia, A; Sharif, Z, 2016
)
0.43
" We report a case of an atazanavir-precipitated drug-drug interaction that led to elevated serum concentrations of lurasidone and associated clinical symptoms of drug toxicity."( A case of a probable drug interaction between lurasidone and atazanavir-based antiretroviral therapy.
Carvalhal, A; Hall, E; Naccarato, M; Ostrowski, M; Wai, A, 2016
)
0.43
" To evaluate the recurrence prevention efficacy of lurasidone for the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder, patients received up to 20 weeks of open-label lurasidone (20-80mg/d) combined with lithium or valproate during an initial stabilization phase."( Lurasidone in combination with lithium or valproate for the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder.
Calabrese, JR; Cucchiaro, J; Loebel, A; Mao, Y; Pikalov, A; Streicher, C, 2017
)
0.46
"Antipsychotics are often used in combination with other psychotropic drugs to treat a variety of psychiatric disorders, as well as in combination with other drugs taken by patients with co-morbidities."( Asenapine and iloperidone decrease the expression of major cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes. A significance for drug-drug interactions during combined therapy.
Danek, PJ; Daniel, WA; Wójcikowski, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Then, we constructed rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM) incubation system to screen potential anti-tumor drugs that could interact with lurasidone and studied its inhibitory mechanism."( The impacts of CYP3A4 genetic polymorphism and drug interactions on the metabolism of lurasidone.
Cai, JP; Hu, GX; Li, Q; Liu, YN; Shen, Y; Wang, J; Wang, ZL; Xu, RA; Zhou, Q, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

The aim of this study is to test the efficiency of phospholipid based self-nanoemulsifying self-nanosuspension (p-SNESNS) formulation as a powerful tool to diminish the food effect on bioavailability.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Following oral administration, absolute oral bioavailability was not dose dependent with approximately 23%."( Pharmacokinetics of lurasidone, a novel atypical anti-psychotic drug, in rats.
Chae, YJ; Koo, TS; Lee, KR, 2011
)
0.37
" The bioavailability of lurasidone is enhanced three-fold by administration with food."( Comment on the potential utility of the new atypical antipsychotic lurasidone in the geriatric population.
Guay, DR, 2011
)
0.37
" Study 1 (n = 16) evaluated the effect of fasting and three meal types (100 kcal/medium fat, 200 kcal/medium fat, and 800-1000 kcal/high fat), and Study 2 (n = 26) evaluated the effect of fasting and five meal types (350 kcal/high fat, 500 kcal/low fat, 500 kcal/high fat, 800-1000 kcal/low fat, and 800-1000 kcal/high fat) on the bioavailability of lurasidone."( Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone: results of two randomized, open-label, crossover studies.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, S, 2013
)
0.39
"The purpose of this work was to develop a new formulation to enhance the bioavailability and reduce the food effect of lurasidone using self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDSs)."( Enhanced oral bioavailability of lurasidone by self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system in fasted state.
Chen, G; Lili, R; Miao, Y; Ouyang, P; Sun, J, 2016
)
0.43
"It was concluded that enhanced bioavailability and no food effect of lurasidone had been achieved by using SNEDDS."( Enhanced oral bioavailability of lurasidone by self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system in fasted state.
Chen, G; Lili, R; Miao, Y; Ouyang, P; Sun, J, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study is to test the efficiency of phospholipid based self-nanoemulsifying self-nanosuspension (p-SNESNS) formulation as a powerful tool to diminish the food effect on bioavailability of lurasidone hydrochloride as BCS Class II model drug."( Phospholipid based self-nanoemulsifying self-nanosuspension (p-SNESNS) as a dual solubilization approach for development of formulation with diminished food effect: Fast/fed in vivo pharmacokinetics study in human.
Abdallah Ahmed, M; Basalious, EB, 2017
)
0.64
"The global aim of this research was to develop and evaluate self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) to improve oral bioavailability of Lurasidone Hydrochloride (LH)."( Self microemulsifying drug delivery system of lurasidone hydrochloride for enhanced oral bioavailability by lymphatic targeting: In vitro, Caco-2 cell line and in vivo evaluation.
Patel, MH; Sawant, KK, 2019
)
0.97
"3 mg/kg acute oral), respectively, and relative bioavailability comparing these two routes of administration was of 19."( Antipsychotic lurasidone: Behavioural and pharmacokinetic data in C57BL/6 mice.
Bouet, V; Boulouard, M; Freret, T; Lagadu, S; Percelay, S; Since, M, 2020
)
0.56
"Lurasidone is an important antipsychotic drug indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with an oral bioavailability of 9-19% owing to its poor aqueous solubility."( Harnessing the potential of nanostructured formulations to mimic the food effect of lurasidone.
Bremmell, KE; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA; Wignall, A, 2021
)
0.62

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Principal advantages over some other second-generation antipsychotics are lurasidone's highly favourable metabolic profile and once-daily dosing regimen."( Lurasidone for schizophrenia: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved second-generation antipsychotic.
Citrome, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Iloperidone and asenapine are dosed twice daily, in contrast to lurasidone, which is dosed once daily with food."( Iloperidone, asenapine, and lurasidone: a brief overview of 3 new second-generation antipsychotics.
Citrome, L, 2011
)
0.37
"Participants, who were recently admitted inpatients with schizophrenia with an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms, were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with 40 mg of lurasidone, 120 mg of lurasidone, 15 mg of olanzapine (included to test for assay sensitivity), or placebo, dosed once daily."( Lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled study.
Cucchiaro, J; Kalali, AH; Loebel, A; Meltzer, HY; Ogasa, M; Phillips, D; Pikalov, A; Schweizer, E; Silva, R; Xu, J, 2011
)
0.37
" Lurasidone will be a difficult drug to use in the elder patient population because of the virtual absence of elder-specific information, limitations of existing formulations (40 and 80 mg nonscored tablets) in enabling precise dosage adjustment, and the substantial difference in bioavailability with food versus fasting, with attendant risks for over- and underdosing depending on when the drug is ingested."( Comment on the potential utility of the new atypical antipsychotic lurasidone in the geriatric population.
Guay, DR, 2011
)
0.37
" Further study is needed to determine whether these results concerning mechanism and dosage can be the basis for prevention of the development of CIS in at risk populations."( Prevention of the phencyclidine-induced impairment in novel object recognition in female rats by co-administration of lurasidone or tandospirone, a 5-HT(1A) partial agonist.
Adelekun, AE; Hannaway, KE; Horiguchi, M; Jayathilake, K; Meltzer, HY, 2012
)
0.38
" Principal advantages over some other second-generation antipsychotics are lurasidone's highly favorable metabolic profile and once-daily dosing regimen."( Lurasidone in schizophrenia: new information about dosage and place in therapy.
Citrome, L, 2012
)
0.38
" However, these agents differ from one another in terms of formulations, pharmacokinetics, and dosing and nonmetabolic adverse effect profile."( Asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone: critical appraisal of the most recently approved pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia in adults.
Bobo, WV, 2013
)
0.39
"Participants, who were recently admitted inpatients with schizophrenia with an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms, were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of fixed-dose, double-blind treatment with lurasidone 80 mg (n=125), lurasidone 160 mg (n=121), quetiapine XR 600 mg (QXR-600 mg; n=119; active control included to test for assay sensitivity), or placebo (n=121), all dosed once daily in the evening."( Efficacy and safety of lurasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, C; Kalali, AH; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Potkin, SG; Sarma, K; Xu, L, 2013
)
0.39
"To examine the effectiveness of switching patients to lurasidone using 3 different dosing strategies."( Effectiveness of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched from other antipsychotics: a randomized, 6-week, open-label study.
Citrome, L; Cucchiaro, J; Hernandez, D; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; McEvoy, JP; Pikalov, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Adults with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a nonacute phase of illness were randomized to 1 of 3 lurasidone dosing regimens for the initial 2 weeks of the study: (1) 40 mg/d for 2 weeks; (2) 40 mg/d for 1 week, increased to 80 mg/d on day 8 for week 2 (up-titration group); and (3) 80 mg/d for 2 weeks."( Effectiveness of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched from other antipsychotics: a randomized, 6-week, open-label study.
Citrome, L; Cucchiaro, J; Hernandez, D; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; McEvoy, JP; Pikalov, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Patients who completed a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of fixed doses of once-daily lurasidone (40 or 120 mg) or olanzapine 15 mg (to confirm assay sensitivity) were eligible to receive flexibly dosed lurasidone 40 to 120 mg/d in this 6-month, open-label extension study (conducted from March 2008 to December 2009)."( Effectiveness of lurasidone for patients with schizophrenia following 6 weeks of acute treatment with lurasidone, olanzapine, or placebo: a 6-month, open-label, extension study.
Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Simonelli, D; Stahl, SM, 2013
)
0.39
"Open-label treatment with flexibly dosed lurasidone (40-120 mg/d) was generally safe, well tolerated, and effective over a 6-month period in patients who had completed a preceding 6-week, double-blind study."( Effectiveness of lurasidone for patients with schizophrenia following 6 weeks of acute treatment with lurasidone, olanzapine, or placebo: a 6-month, open-label, extension study.
Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Simonelli, D; Stahl, SM, 2013
)
0.39
"Clinical pharmacology as an interdisciplinary science is unique in its capacity and the diversity of the methods and approaches it can provide to derive dosing recommendations in various subpopulations."( An integrated clinical pharmacology approach for deriving dosing recommendations in a regulatory setting: review of recent cases in psychiatry drugs.
Mehta, MU; Rogers, H; Uppoor, RS; Younis, IR; Zhang, H; Zhu, H, 2013
)
0.39
" Maximum serum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the serum concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-tau ) were determined on Day 5 for each meal type."( Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone: results of two randomized, open-label, crossover studies.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, S, 2013
)
0.39
"Monotherapy with lurasidone in the dosage range of 20-120 mg/day significantly reduced depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar I depression."( Lurasidone monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar I depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Kroger, H; Loebel, A; Sachs, G; Sarma, K; Silva, R, 2014
)
0.4
" The time to development of Pisa syndrome, patient demographics, dosing and titration of causative medications, approach to treatment, and resolution of Pisa syndrome varied widely in these reports."( Risperidone-induced Pisa syndrome in MS: resolution with lurasidone and recurrence with Chlorpromazine.
Diefenderfer, LA; Iuppa, CA, 2013
)
0.39
"Patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with fixed doses of lurasidone 80 mg/d (n = 125), lurasidone 160 mg/d (n = 121), quetiapine XR 600 mg/d (n = 119), or placebo (n = 121), all dosed once daily in the evening, with food."( Daytime sleepiness associated with lurasidone and quetiapine XR: results from a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with schizophrenia.
Cucchiaro, JB; Harvey, PD; Loebel, AD; Pikalov, AA; Siu, CO, 2014
)
0.4
" Patients started the extension study on treatment with the same dose of lurasidone taken at study endpoint of the 6-week core study; following this, lurasidone was flexibly dosed (40-120 mg/day), if clinically indicated, starting on Day 7 of the extension study."( Effectiveness of lurasidone in schizophrenia or schizoaffective patients switched from other antipsychotics: a 6-month, open-label, extension study.
Citrome, L; Correll, CU; Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A; McEvoy, JP; Weiden, PJ, 2014
)
0.4
"Seven phase I studies were conducted to investigate the effects of repeated dosing of ketoconazole, diltiazem, rifampin, or lithium on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single oral doses of lurasidone, or the effects of repeated dosing of lurasidone on the PK of digoxin, midazolam, or the oral contraceptive norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol."( Lurasidone drug-drug interaction studies: a comprehensive review.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, SH, 2014
)
0.4
" Steady-state dosing with lurasidone increased Cmax and AUC0-24 (AUC from time 0 to 24 h postdose) of digoxin by 9% and 13%, respectively, and of midazolam by 21% and 44%, respectively."( Lurasidone drug-drug interaction studies: a comprehensive review.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, SH, 2014
)
0.4
"Lurasidone PK is altered by strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors or inducers, and coadministration is contraindicated; whereas moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors have less effect, and lurasidone dosage restrictions are recommended."( Lurasidone drug-drug interaction studies: a comprehensive review.
Chiu, YY; Ereshefsky, L; Loebel, A; Poola, N; Preskorn, SH, 2014
)
0.4
" Available only in an oral formulation, it is effective in once-daily dosing (40 - 160 mg/day) and its absorption is affected by food."( Lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a critical evaluation.
Bruijnzeel, D; Suryadevara, U; Tandon, R; Yazdanpanah, M, 2015
)
0.42
" The purpose of this report is to describe the background, rationale and design of this study that included a novel method for the assessment of the potential for dose-response in early non-responding patients with schizophrenia."( Treatment of early non-response in patients with schizophrenia: assessing the efficacy of antipsychotic dose escalation.
Citrome, L; Correll, CU; Cucchiaro, J; Kane, JM; Loebel, A; Xu, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Characterization of dose-response relationships for psychotropic agents may be difficult to determine based on results of individual clinical studies, particularly those with a flexible dose design."( Lurasidone Dose Response in Bipolar Depression: A Population Dose-response Analysis.
Chapel, S; Chiu, YY; Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A, 2016
)
0.43
" A linear dose-response model best described the effect of lurasidone."( Lurasidone Dose Response in Bipolar Depression: A Population Dose-response Analysis.
Chapel, S; Chiu, YY; Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A, 2016
)
0.43
"This population dose-response modeling analysis indicates that higher doses of lurasidone are likely to produce greater therapeutic effects in patients with bipolar depression."( Lurasidone Dose Response in Bipolar Depression: A Population Dose-response Analysis.
Chapel, S; Chiu, YY; Cucchiaro, J; Hsu, J; Loebel, A, 2016
)
0.43
" In bipolar depression broader dosage ranges (20-120mg/day) were found to be effective."( Lurasidone: The 2016 update on the pharmacology, efficacy and safety profile.
Datka, W; Jaeschke, RR; Misztak, P; Pańczyszyn-Trzewik, P; Sowa-Kućma, M; Styczeń, K, 2016
)
0.43
" We recommend requiring normal-weight and obese patients to limit the dosage of lurasidone, or undergo a washout period, for two and three weeks, respectively, after discontinuation of posaconazole."( Sustained Impairment of Lurasidone Clearance After Discontinuation of Posaconazole: Impact of Obesity, and Implications for Patient Safety.
Chow, CR; Greenblatt, DJ; Harmatz, JS; Ryan, MJ, 2018
)
0.48
"The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians."( Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Antipsychotic Drugs for Acute Schizophrenia.
Crippa, A; Davis, JM; Leucht, S; Orsini, N; Patel, MX; Siafis, S, 2020
)
0.56
" Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model."( Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Antipsychotic Drugs for Acute Schizophrenia.
Crippa, A; Davis, JM; Leucht, S; Orsini, N; Patel, MX; Siafis, S, 2020
)
0.56
" For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau."( Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Antipsychotic Drugs for Acute Schizophrenia.
Crippa, A; Davis, JM; Leucht, S; Orsini, N; Patel, MX; Siafis, S, 2020
)
0.56
" Patients 10-17 years of age with a DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar I depression were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with flexibly dosed lurasidone (20-80 mg/day) (n = 173) or placebo (n = 170)."( C-reactive protein and response to lurasidone treatment in children and adolescents with bipolar I depression: Results from a placebo-controlled trial.
Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Raison, CL; Siu, C; Tocco, M, 2020
)
0.56
" This study brings tools to improve pharmacological validity of preclinical models of psychiatric diseases, and to adapt dosage of antipsychotics according to the route used."( Antipsychotic lurasidone: Behavioural and pharmacokinetic data in C57BL/6 mice.
Bouet, V; Boulouard, M; Freret, T; Lagadu, S; Percelay, S; Since, M, 2020
)
0.56
" In the extension study, lurasidone was flexibly dosed (20 to 120 mg/day)."( Lurasidone in the Long-Term Treatment of Bipolar I Depression: A 28-week Open Label Extension Study.
Hagi, K; Higuchi, T; Ishigooka, J; Kato, T; Masuda, T; Miyajima, M; Watabe, K, 2021
)
0.62
"We compared the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of lurasidone at different doses to establish the dose-response relationships of lurasidone therapeutic and adverse effects in acute schizophrenia."( A network meta-analysis of the dose-response effects of lurasidone on acute schizophrenia.
Likhitsathian, S; Maneeton, B; Maneeton, N; Srisurapanont, M; Suttajit, S, 2021
)
0.62
" Data to guide dosing in pregnancy that maximizes efficacy and minimizes adverse effects are lacking."( Perinatal use of lurasidone for the treatment of bipolar disorder.
Clark, CT; Montiel, C; Newmark, RL, 2022
)
0.72
" For lurasidone, the combination of lipid-based nanostructure and porous silica nanostructure (SLH) led to optimal fasted state bioavailability which can ultimately result in enhanced treatment efficacy, easier dosing regimens and improved patient outcomes."( Harnessing the potential of nanostructured formulations to mimic the food effect of lurasidone.
Bremmell, KE; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA; Wignall, A, 2021
)
0.62
"The moderating effects of these bridge symptoms on the response to flexibly dosed lurasidone 20-80 mg/d compared to placebo treatment was analyzed in children and adolescents with bipolar I depression in a six-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study followed by a 2-year, openlabel extension study of lurasidone."( Sleep Disturbance, Irritability, and Response to Lurasidone Treatment in Children and Adolescents with Bipolar Depression.
Loebel, A; Pikalov, A; Singh, MK; Siu, C; Tocco, M, 2023
)
0.91
" This finding supports once-daily dosing regimen of antipsychotics and abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation when switching to another antipsychotic."( Does short-term antipsychotic discontinuation of up to 3 weeks worsen symptoms in acute schizophrenia? A pooled analysis of placebo washout data.
Takeuchi, H; Watabe, K, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
dopaminergic antagonistA drug that binds to but does not activate dopamine receptors, thereby blocking the actions of dopamine or exogenous agonists.
serotonergic antagonistDrugs that bind to but do not activate serotonin receptors, thereby blocking the actions of serotonin or serotonergic agonists.
adrenergic antagonistAn agent that binds to but does not activate adrenergic receptors thereby blocking the actions of endogenous or exogenous adrenergic agonists.
second generation antipsychoticAntipsychotic drugs which can have different modes of action but which tend to be less likely than first generation antipsychotics to cause extrapyramidal motor control disabilities such as body rigidity or Parkinson's disease-type movements.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
hydrochlorideA salt formally resulting from the reaction of hydrochloric acid with an organic base.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Research

Studies (343)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's4 (1.17)29.6817
2010's231 (67.35)24.3611
2020's108 (31.49)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 61.00

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index61.00 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.10 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index98.52 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (61.00)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials76 (20.71%)5.53%
Reviews89 (24.25%)6.00%
Case Studies44 (11.99%)4.05%
Observational3 (0.82%)0.25%
Other155 (42.23%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (77)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Comparison of NRX-101 to Standard of Care (Lurasidone) for Treatment-resistant Bipolar Depression With Suicidal Ideation and Behavior [NCT03395392]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-12Recruiting
Chinese Longitudinal and Systematic Study of Bioplar Disorder [NCT05480150]10,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
Sequential Therapy (NRX-100 Followed by NRX-101) for the Treatment of Acute Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Bipolar Depression: the STABIL-B Study [NCT02974010]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-15Completed
An Observational Drug Utilization Study of SYCREST^® (Asenapine) in the United Kingdom [NCT01498770]42 participants (Actual)Observational2013-04-01Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study With Lurasidone Injectable Suspension to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics in Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT03627195]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-07Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of Lurasidone In Subjects With Schizophrenia Switched From Olanzapine: An Open-label, Single-arm And Multi-center Study for 16 Weeks [NCT05213143]Phase 4162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-30Active, not recruiting
The Safety and Effectiveness of Latuda® Post-marketing Surveillance in the Treatment of Chinese Schizophrenia Patients [NCT04432688]3,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2020-12-01Enrolling by invitation
AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, THREE-PERIOD, TWO-SEQUENCE CROSSOVER, REPEATED-DOSE, REPLICATE DESIGN STUDY TO DETERMINE THE BIOEQUIVALENCE OF TWO DIFFERENT LURASIDONE FORMULATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA, SCHIZOAFFECTIVE, OR SCHIZOPHRENIFORM DISORDER [NCT01082250]Phase 152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
[NCT01082276]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Determine the Effect of Repeated Dose Lurasidone 120 mg Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Digoxin 0.25 mg in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder. [NCT01082289]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Multi-site, Parallel-group, Rater-blind Study Comparing Response With Aripiprazole Once Monthly and Standard of Care Oral Antipsychotics in Non-adherent Outpatients With Schizophrenia Identified Using the Brief Adherence Rating Scale [NCT02282085]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Recruiting
A 6-Week Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lurasidone Adjunctive Therapy in Improving Cognitive Functioning in Euthymic Bipolar Disorder Patients (ELICE-BD) [NCT02731612]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-08Recruiting
A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Single Arm and Flexible Dose Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Use Lurasidone HCl Tablet (LATUDA®) for 40-160 mg/Day in Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT03393026]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-03Completed
Changes in Cognitive Functioning in Euthymic Bipolar Patients Treated With Lurasidone Versus Treatment as Usual; A Randomized, Open-Label Study. [NCT02147379]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
An Open Label Study of NRX-101 for Patients With Acute Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Pyelonephritis [NCT06128213]Phase 213 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-31Not yet recruiting
18F-DOPA PET to Elucidate the Antidepressant Mechanism of Lurasidone in Bipolar Disorder [NCT03902613]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-07Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Flexible-dose, Parallel-group Study of Lurasidone Adjunctive to Lithium or Divalproex for the Prevention of Recurrence in Subjects With Bipolar I Disorder [NCT01358357]Phase 3965 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
High Dose Lurasidone for Patients With Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia [NCT01569659]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
[NCT01082263]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Determine the Effect of Calories and Fat Content on the Pharmacokinetics of Repeated Dose Lurasidone 120 mg in Subjects With Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophreniform Disorder. [NCT01074632]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Long-term Extension Study of SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT01614912]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ASP4345 as Add-on Treatment for Cognitive Impairment in Subjects With Schizophrenia on Stable Doses of Antipsychotic Medication [NCT03557931]Phase 2233 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-13Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of SM-13496 for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression. [NCT01986101]Phase 3525 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-19Completed
Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel- Group, Placebo-controlled, Confirmatory Study of SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT01614899]Phase 3457 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-02Completed
Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Confirmatory Study of SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT00711269]Phase 3460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-27Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Lurasidone in Subjects With Schizophrenia (PEARL 3 Extension Study) [NCT00789698]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Randomized, 6-week, Open-Label, Study Evaluating The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Lurasidone for The Treatment of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder in Subjects Switched From Other Antipsychotic Agents [NCT01143077]Phase 3244 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, CLinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Three Doses of Lurasidone HCl in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT00549718]Phase 3489 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, 2-Period, Sequential, Drug-Drug Interaction Study To Determine The Effect Of Lithium 600 Mg BID On The Safety And Pharmacokinetics Of Lurasidone 120 Mg QD In Patients With Schizophrenia Or Schizoaffective Disorder [NCT01074073]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Lurasidone HCl on Oral Contraceptive Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Female Subjects [NCT00549666]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Open-Label Study of Latuda for the Treatment of Mania in Children and Adolescents 6-17 Years Old With Bipolar I, Bipolar II and Bipolar Spectrum Disorder [NCT01932541]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to On hold due to competing departmental studies)
A Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of [Issthiazolyl-3-14C]-Lurasidone Following Postprandial Single Oral Dose Administration in Health Male Subjects [NCT01082146]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
An Exploratory Analysis of Immune and Inflammatory Response Associated With Clozapine Versus Non-Clozapine Antipsychotics in Individuals With Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia [NCT05741502]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-16Recruiting
A D2 Receptor Occupancy and fMRI Study in Schizophrenic Subjects Treated With Lurasidone [NCT01979679]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies [NCT02893371]1,037,352 participants (Actual)Observational2016-09-30Completed
Impact of Structural and Myelin Abnormalities on Cognitive Impairments in Recent-onset Schizophrenia - Before and After Lurasidone Treatment (MARYLU) [NCT05351736]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-26Recruiting
A 24-Week, Flexible-Dose, Open-label Extension Study of Subjects Switched to Lurasidone for the Treatment of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder (Protocol No. D1050290) [NCT01143090]Phase 3149 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized, 6-week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Fixed-dose, Parallel Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Mixed Features [NCT01423240]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn
A Randomized, 6-Week, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression [NCT04383691]Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-11Terminated(stopped due to Company's business decision)
Pharmacokinetics of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care [NCT01431326]3,520 participants (Actual)Observational2011-11-30Completed
A 12-Week, Open-Label Extension Study For the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Mixed Features [NCT01423253]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A 24-Week, Flexible-Dose, Open-Label Extension Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression [NCT00868959]Phase 3817 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Randomized, 6-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled, Flexible-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone Adjunctive to Lithium or Divalproex for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression [NCT00868452]Phase 3348 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Twelve Week, Multicenter, Open Label Extension Study in Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT01566162]Phase 3191 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-and Active Comparator Controlled, Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Lurasidone HCl in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia. [NCT00615433]Phase 3478 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Validation of the Glx Biomarker for Treatment of Moderate Bipolar Depression With NRX-101 [NCT03402152]Phase 2/Phase 38 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
NRX-101 for Maintenance of Remission From Severe Bipolar Depression in Patients With Acute Suicidal Ideation and Behavior: The SBD-ASIB Study [NCT03396068]Phase 372 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, 6-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Flexible Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression [NCT00868699]Phase 3505 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Lurasidone in Acutely Psychotic Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT01821378]Phase 3412 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Lurasidone Effects on Tissue Glutamate in Schizophrenia [NCT02199743]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
An Open-Label Pilot Study of Lurasidone in Treating Antipsychotic Naive or Quasi-Naive Children and Adolescents [NCT01731119]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Double-blind Fixed-dose Study of Lurasidone (SM-13496) and Placebo in the Treatment of Schizophrenia [NCT00088634]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Randomized, 6-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Flexible-dose, Parallel-group Study of Lurasidone Adjunctive to Lithium or Divalproex for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression in Subjects Demonstrating Non-response to Treatment With Lithium or Diva [NCT01284517]Phase 3356 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Twelve-Month Study of Safety and Tolerability in the Treatment of Schizophrenia [NCT00088621]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Dose-Blinded, Multicenter, 6-Month Study of Safety and Tolerability of 3 Dose Levels of SM-13496 (Lurasidone) in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT00044005]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal Study Of Lurasidone For The Maintenance Treatment Of Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT01435928]Phase 3676 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
"Observational Study on the Effect of Switch to Lurasidone or Other Antipsychothics on Metabolic and Weight Changes in Subjects With Schizophrenia" [NCT04312503]95 participants (Actual)Observational2020-07-13Completed
A Long-Term Study of SM-13496 in Patients With Bipolar I Disorder. [NCT01986114]Phase 3495 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group and Multicenter Study to Investigate Lurasidone in Treatment of Schizophrenia Compared With Risperidone [NCT02002832]Phase 3388 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT03465787]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-09Completed
Effect of Lurasidone Vs Olanzapine on Neurotrophic Biomarkers and Cardiometabolic Parameters in First Episode Untreated Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Open Label, Active Controlled Study [NCT03304457]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-25Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of Lurasidone With Different Initiation Dose in Chinese Acute Phase Patients With Schizophrenia: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Open-Label Study for 6 Weeks [NCT05011669]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-16Enrolling by invitation
Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Lurasidone in Subjects With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder: A Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Trial [NCT00641745]Phase 3629 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Pharmacokinetic Study of Lurasidone After Single Oral Administration in Healthy Subjects [NCT02174510]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Multi-center, Open Label, Flexible Dose, Extension Study of Lurasidone Adjunctive to Lithium or Divalproex in Subjects With Bipolar I Disorder [NCT01575561]Phase 3377 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
A 6-Week, Double-Blind, Randomized, Fixed-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of SM-13496 Compared to Placebo and Haloperidol in Patients With Schizophrenia Who Are Experiencing an Acute Exacerbation of Symptoms [NCT00044044]Phase 2356 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Pharmacokinetic Study of Lurasidone After Multiple Oral Administration in Healthy Human Subjects [NCT02174523]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Lurasidone in Acutely Psychotic Subjects With Schizophrenia (PEARL 3) [NCT00790192]Phase 3488 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase 1 Open-Label, Multicenter, Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Lurasidone in Subjects 6 to 17 Years Old With Schizophrenia Spectrum, Bipolar Spectrum, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, or Ot [NCT01620060]Phase 1105 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Improving Metabolic Parameters of Antipsychotic Child Treatment (IMPACT) [NCT00806234]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized, 6-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Mixed Features [NCT01421134]Phase 3211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Long-term, Multicenter, Open-Label, Flexible Dose Continuation Study in Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Lurasidone Study [NCT01485640]Phase 3162 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A 104-Week, Flexible-Dose, Open-Label, Multicenter, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Lurasidone in Pediatric Subjects [NCT01914393]Phase 3702 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Randomized, 6-Week, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible Dose, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescent Subjects With Bipolar I Depression [NCT02046369]Phase 3350 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A 6-Week, Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescent Subjects With Irritability Associated With Autistic Disorder [NCT01911442]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A 6-Week Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose, Multicenter Study To Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia [NCT01911429]Phase 3327 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Identification of Biosignatures for Lurasidone (Latuda) Response in Bipolar Depression [NCT02239094]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00044005 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00044044 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores
NCT00044044 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores
NCT00044044 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)Total Score
NCT00044044 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores
NCT00088621 (1) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an Adverse Events in a One Year Open Label Lurasidone Study
NCT00088634 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores
NCT00088634 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores
NCT00088634 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) Total Score
NCT00088634 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores
NCT00549718 (2) [back to overview]Change in Total PANSS Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Phase
NCT00549718 (2) [back to overview]CGI-S From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment
NCT00615433 (2) [back to overview]Change in Total PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Treatment Period.
NCT00615433 (2) [back to overview]CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment.
NCT00641745 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the PANSS General Psychopathology Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT00711269 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscales at Week 6
NCT00789698 (4) [back to overview]Relapse of Psychotic Symptoms
NCT00789698 (4) [back to overview]Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to the End (Month 12) of the Double-blind Treatment in the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores
NCT00789698 (4) [back to overview]Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to Month 6 of the Double-blind Treatment in the CogState Computerized Cognitive Scores.
NCT00789698 (4) [back to overview]Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to the End (Month 12) of the Double-blind Treatment in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
NCT00790192 (2) [back to overview]Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Mean Change in Total PANSS Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Phase
NCT00790192 (2) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome: CGI-S From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment
NCT00806234 (4) [back to overview]Triglyceride Levels
NCT00806234 (4) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score Change
NCT00806234 (4) [back to overview]Change in Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index
NCT00806234 (4) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Level
NCT00868452 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)
NCT00868452 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)
NCT00868452 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
NCT00868699 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
NCT00868699 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)
NCT00868699 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)
NCT00868959 (3) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Extension Baseline to Week 24 (Month 6/LOCF Endpoint) in Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)
NCT00868959 (3) [back to overview]Change From Open-label Extension Baseline to Week 24 (Month 6/LOCF Endpoint) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
NCT00868959 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Who Have Completed 24 Weeks of Extension Study Treatment
NCT01143077 (2) [back to overview]Tolerability and Safety
NCT01143077 (2) [back to overview]Time to Relapse of Psychotic Symptoms During 6 Weeks
NCT01143090 (1) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01284517 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)
NCT01284517 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)
NCT01284517 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Time to All-cause Discontinuation
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score
NCT01358357 (14) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Remission, Defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score of ≤ 12 at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Response, Defined as ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF).
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Scores
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
NCT01421134 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) Total Score
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in CGI-S Score
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the HAM-A Total Score
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the YMRS Total Score
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Scores
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
NCT01423253 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the SDS Total Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Time to First Relapse Event During Double-blind Phase
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Smoking Questionnaire (Average Number of Cigarettes Per Day) at Week 28 (LOCF)
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Intent to Attend (ITA) Assessment at Open-label Baseline
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Brief Adherence Rating Scale
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]EuroQol (EQ-5D): EQ-VAS Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short Form-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2) Physical Component Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline in Modified Specific Levels of Functioning (SLOF) Total Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Change From Double-blind Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
NCT01435928 (11) [back to overview]Time to All-cause Discontinuation
NCT01485640 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent AEs, SAEs or Who Discontinued Due to AEs
NCT01485640 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 18 (LOCF) in the Clinical Global Impression Severity Score (CGI-S
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS)
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Efficacy - Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score.
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Efficacy - Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Modified Specific Levels of Functioning (SLOF) Total Score.
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12)
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Safety - Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation, and Serious AEs (SAEs)
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Intent to Attend Assessment
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Montgomery -Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score
NCT01566162 (9) [back to overview]Smoking Questionnaire
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Depression Scale
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Mania Score
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Overall Score- Severity of Illness as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S)
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the MADRS Total Score- Depression as Assessed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Positive Subscale (PANSS P) Score
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the YMRS Total Score -Mania as Assessed by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the SDS Total Score
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS SR16) Total Score
NCT01575561 (9) [back to overview]Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Week 6
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Scores at Week 6
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Scores at Week 6
NCT01614899 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Scores at Week 6
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at LOCF Endpoint
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at LOCF Endpoint
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint
NCT01614912 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint
NCT01620060 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events
NCT01620060 (3) [back to overview]Lurasidone Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01620060 (3) [back to overview]Lurasidone Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters
NCT01731119 (5) [back to overview]Overall Clinical Improvement
NCT01731119 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Side Effects
NCT01731119 (5) [back to overview]Changes in Efficacy Measures
NCT01731119 (5) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT01731119 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Completing Treatment
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 for Lurasidone 20 mg and 80-160 mg Versus Placebo.
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the MADRS Total Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Compared to the Placebo Group in the Euroqol (EQ-5D) Index Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Compared to the Placebo Group in the GAF Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg, and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Versus the Placebo Group in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Week 2 to Week 6 for ENR Lurasidone 80 mg vs. ENR Lurasidone 160 mg in CGI-S Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Week 2 to Week 6 for the ENR (Early Non-responders) Lurasidone 160mg Group vs the ENR (Early Non-responders) Lurasidone 80 mg Group in the Following: PANSS Total Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the CGI-S Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the PANSS Total Score
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve a Response, Defined as 20% or Greater Improvement From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Score (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6
NCT01821378 (11) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Week 6 for Lurasidone 20 mg and 80-160 mg Versus Placebo.
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Responders, Where Response is Based on ≥ 20% Improvement From Baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 6
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Excitability Subscale Scores
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Scores
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Scores
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive, Negative Subscale Scores
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q)
NCT01911429 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6.
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 6
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scales (CY-BOCS) Modified for Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs)
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) at Week 6
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ)
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Subscale Score at Week 6
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least 25% Reduction From Baseline to Week 6 in the ABC Irritability Subscale Score.
NCT01911442 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Who Have CGI-I Score of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) at Week 6
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PAR) Total Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression -Severity Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs and Serious AEs (SAEs)
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Hyperactivity and Noncompliance Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Lethargy and Social Withdrawal Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Stereotypic Behavior Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficity/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Total Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ) Global Strain Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Score (CY-BOCS)
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version (CGI-BP-S) Depression Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-Rated Children's Global Assessment Score (CGAS) Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS Excitability Subscale Score
NCT01914393 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score
NCT01986101 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the YMRS Total Score at Week 6
NCT01986101 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the SDS Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT01986101 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the HAM-A Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)
NCT01986101 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP-S (Depression) Score at Week 6
NCT01986101 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6
NCT01986114 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) and Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
NCT01986114 (4) [back to overview]Change From Long Term Study Baseline to LOCF Endpoint in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score
NCT01986114 (4) [back to overview]Change From Long Term Study Baseline to LOCF Endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.
NCT01986114 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Experienced Recurrence/Relapse of Any Mood Event From Clinical Stability of Bipolar Disorder.
NCT02002832 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Scores.
NCT02002832 (2) [back to overview]Mean Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6.
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Score as Compared to Placebo.
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score as Compared to Placebo From Double-Blind Baseline to Week 6 (Day 43) Baseline
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Score as Compared to Placebo.
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) Score as Compared to Placebo.
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score as Compared to Placebo.
NCT02046369 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar-Severity (CGI-BP-S) Depression Score
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone Tmax
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone CL/F
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone Cmax
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone MRT
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone t1/2
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone VZ/F
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone λZ
NCT02174510 (8) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Vzss/F
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone λz
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone λz
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratios Lurasidone,Ratio of Cmax,Ratio of AUC0-∞,Ratio of AUC0-τ,
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Summary of Concentration (ng/mL) of Lurasidone - PK Population the Mean (SD) of Day 4 and Day 5
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC0-∞
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Summary of Concentration (ng/mL) of Lurasidone - PK Population the Mean (SD) of Day 6 and Day 7
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Vz/F
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]CLss/F
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC 0-24
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC 0-24
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC 0-τ
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC 0-τ
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone AUC0-∞
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone CL/F
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Cmax
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Cmax
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone MRT
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone MRT
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone t1/2
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone t1/2
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Tmax
NCT02174523 (23) [back to overview]Lurasidone Tmax
NCT02199743 (2) [back to overview]Brief Assessments of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scores (BACS)
NCT02199743 (2) [back to overview]Cerebral Glutamate Levels
NCT02239094 (2) [back to overview]Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS)
NCT02239094 (2) [back to overview]Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) at Week8
NCT02974010 (1) [back to overview]BDM Score (BISS-derived MADRS) Change From Baseline at Day 42
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Concentration at Trough Level (Ctrough) for ASP4345
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Values
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Values
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Values
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Values
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12/EoT in University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment-2 Extended Range (UPSA-2-ER) Total Score
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03557931 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12/End of Treatment (EoT) in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite Score
NCT03627195 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC0-last] for Lurasidone After Lurasidone Injectable Suspension Administration
NCT03627195 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Serum Concentration [Cmax] for Lurasidone After Lurasidone Injectable Suspension Administration
NCT03627195 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs ) Leading to Study Discontinuation
NCT03902613 (1) [back to overview]Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The primary objective of this 6-month open-label study was to evaluate the safety of 3 doses of lurasidone. (NCT00044005)
Timeframe: 6-months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone 20 mg19
Lurasidone 40 mg22
Lurasidone 80mg18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores

The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale that assesses apparent and reported sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty in concentration, and lack of interest. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale with a score of 0 reflecting no symptoms and a score of 6 reflecting symptoms of maximum severity. (NCT00044044)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg-1.3
40 mg-1.1
80 mg-2.5
10 mg Haloperidol-2.7
Placebo-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores

The CGI Severity (CGI-S) assesses the severity of illness of the patient relative to the particular population on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). (NCT00044044)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg-0.5
40 mg-0.4
80 mg-0.8
10 mg Haloperidol-0.8
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)Total Score

"The BPRS consists of 18 ordered categorical items (from not present to extremely severe, on a 1- to 7-point scale), each developed to assess patient symptomatology in a relatively discrete symptom area. The BPRS will be extracted from the PANSS by adding the scores of the 18 items (P2 to P7, N1, N2, and G1 to G10) of the PANSS and will not be assessed separately. The minimum score on the BPRS is 18 and the maximum is 126. The higher number indicates a worsening of schizophrenia." (NCT00044044)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg-5.0
40 mg-5.2
80 mg-8.0
10 mg Haloperidol-9.8
Placebo-7.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores

The PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)is a 30-item scale that evaluates positive, negative, and other symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Scores range from 30-210 with higher scores representing a worsening of schizophrenia. (NCT00044044)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg-7.1
40 mg-7.2
80 mg-13.6
10 mg Haloperidol-16.0
Placebo-12.3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an Adverse Events in a One Year Open Label Lurasidone Study

(NCT00088621)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone 80 mg59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores

The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale that assesses apparent and reported sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty in concentration, and lack of interest. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale with a score of 0 reflecting no symptoms and a score of 6 reflecting symptoms of maximum severity. (NCT00088634)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-2.9
Placebo-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores

The PANSS is a 30-item scale that evaluates positive, negative, and other symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Scores range from 30-210 with higher scores representing a worsening of schizophrenia. (NCT00088634)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-14.1
Placebo-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) Total Score

"The BPRS consists of 18 ordered categorical items (from not present to extremely severe, on a 1- to 7-point scale), each developed to assess patient symptomatology in a relatively discrete symptom area. The BPRS will be extracted from the PANSS by adding the scores of the 18 items (P2 to P7, N1, N2, and G1 to G10) of the PANSS and will not be assessed separately." (NCT00088634)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-8.9
Placebo-4.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores

The CGI Severity (CGI-S) assesses the severity of illness of the patient relative to the particular population on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). (NCT00088634)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-0.6
Placebo-0.2

[back to top]

Change in Total PANSS Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Phase

The PANSS is a 30-item scale (range 30-210) designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items. Higher scores indicate worsening. (NCT00549718)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 40mg-19.2
Lurasidone 80mg-23.4
Lurasidone 120mg-20.5
Placebo-17.0

[back to top]

CGI-S From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment

Clinical Global Impression of Severity is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7 point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. The scale has a single item measured on a 7 point scale from 1 ('normal', not ill) to 7 (extremely ill). (NCT00549718)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 40mg-1.1
Lurasidone 80mg-1.4
Lurasidone 120mg-1.2
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Change in Total PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Treatment Period.

The PANSS is a 30-item rating instrument evaluating the presence/absence and severity of positive, negative and general psychopathology of schizophrenia. The scale was developed from the BPRS and the Psychopathology Rating Scale. All 30 items are rated on a 7-point scale (1=absent; 7=extreme). The total score can range from 30 to 210. Lower scores represent less severity of illness. (NCT00615433)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
40mg-25.7
120mg-23.6
15mg Olz-28.7
Placebo-16.0

[back to top]

CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment.

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7-point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00615433)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscale (Least Squares Mean)
40mg-1.5
120mg-1.4
15mg Olz-1.5
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

(NCT00641745)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone395
Risperidone189

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the PANSS General Psychopathology Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The General Psychopathology subscale addresses other 16 symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS General Psychopathology subscale score is the sum of all 16 items and ranges from 16 through 112. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group-2.4
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group-1.2
Placebo Group-1.0
Risperidone Group-2.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was considered serious if it met one or more of the following criteria: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening (i.e., a patient was at immediate risk of death at the time of the event, not an event where occurrence in a more severe form might have caused death); Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; Was considered to be an important medical event. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group8
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group7
Placebo Group10
Risperidone Group2

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant who was taking a medicinal (investigational) product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with a start date on or after the date of the first dose through the end of follow-up, or adverse events occurring before the date of first dose and worsening during the treatment or follow-up period. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group105
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group103
Placebo Group101
Risperidone Group53

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation

(NCT00711269)
Timeframe: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group18
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group18
Placebo Group27
Risperidone Group7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items and three subscales: the Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility; the Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; and the General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 [Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)]

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group-6.1
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group-4.3
Placebo Group-2.5
Risperidone Group-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Positive subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group-2.0
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group-1.4
Placebo Group-0.6
Risperidone Group-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscales at Week 6

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Negative subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00711269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg Group-1.6
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80-mg Group-1.7
Placebo Group-0.9
Risperidone Group-1.7

[back to top]

Relapse of Psychotic Symptoms

"Time to relapse will be defined as the earliest occurrence of any of the following:~Worsening of >= 30% positive and negative syndrome scale total score from NCT00790192 and clinical global impression-severity sub-scale >=3~rehospitalization for worsening of psychosis~emergence of suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation and/or risk of harm to self or others Comparison of time to relapse of psychotic symptoms between lurasidone and quetiapine XR after 1 year as analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model with country as a covariate." (NCT00789698)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone-Lurasidone29
Quetiapine-Quetiapine21

[back to top]

Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to the End (Month 12) of the Double-blind Treatment in the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a scale ranging from 1-7, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT00789698)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-Lurasidone-1.9
Quetiapine-Quetiapine-1.6

[back to top]

Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to Month 6 of the Double-blind Treatment in the CogState Computerized Cognitive Scores.

The battery has seven outcome measures that measure the cognitive constructs. The seven domains are: detection, identification, one back task, international shopping list task, one card learning task, Groton maze learning task and social emotional matching. The standardized scores for each subject at each assessment will then be averaged to yield a composite score. There are no maximum or minimum values, however a higher score indicates improved performance on the cognitive constructs. The change score is change from baseline to month 6. (NCT00789698)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-Lurasidone0.22
Quetiapine-Quetiapine-0.03

[back to top]

Change From the Acute Phase Baseline to the End (Month 12) of the Double-blind Treatment in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of psychopathology severity in adults with psychotic disorders. Thirty items are rated using a Likert scale, from 1 - 7. The PANSS total score is the sum of thirty items ranging from 30 to 210 (higher score representing a worsening in psychosis). (NCT00789698)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-Lurasidone-34.6
Quetiapine-Quetiapine-25.7

[back to top]

Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Mean Change in Total PANSS Score From Baseline to the End of the Double Blind Phase

The PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) is a 30-item scale (range 30-210) designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items. Higher scores indicate worsening. (NCT00790192)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-22.2
Lurasidone 160 mg-26.5
Quetiapine XR 600mg-27.8
Placebo-10.3

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome: CGI-S From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment

Clinical Global Impression of Severity is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7 point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. The scale has a single item measured on a 7 point scale from 1 ('normal', not ill) to 7 (extremely ill). (NCT00790192)
Timeframe: 6-Weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 80 mg-1.5
Lurasidone 160 mg-1.7
Quetiapine XR 600mg-1.7
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Triglyceride Levels

(NCT00806234)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Healthy Lifestyle Information0.2
Switch Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction16.6
Metformin Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction14.7

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score Change

(NCT00806234)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

InterventionZ Score (Least Squares Mean)
Healthy Lifestyle Information0.040
Switch Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction-0.112
Metformin Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction-0.088

[back to top]

Change in Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index

(NCT00806234)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

InterventionmU/L (Least Squares Mean)
Healthy Lifestyle Information0.74
Switch Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction0.42
Metformin Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction-0.34

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Level

(NCT00806234)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Healthy Lifestyle Information3.6
Switch Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction-8.1
Metformin Treatment + Healthy Lifestyle Instruction-4.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)

CGI-EP-S depression score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT00868452)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-1.96
Placebo-1.51

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)

MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT00868452)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-17.1
Placebo-13.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

STS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT00868452)
Timeframe: Baselin Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-9.5
Placebo-7.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

"Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score is a subject-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The SDS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30. For the SDS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The SDS contains three (3) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 3 items." (NCT00868699)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.3
Lurasidone High Arm-9.8
Lurasidone Low Arm-9.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)

"Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) score (depression) is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The CGI depression score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. For the CGI depression score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome." (NCT00868699)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.14
Lurasidone High Arm-1.71
Lurasidone Low Arm-1.83

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)

"Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the MADRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The MADRS contains ten (10) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 10 items." (NCT00868699)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.7
Lurasidone High Arm-15.4
Lurasidone Low Arm-15.4

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Extension Baseline to Week 24 (Month 6/LOCF Endpoint) in Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)

"This CGI-BP-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subjects current severity of depression and ranges from 1=Normal, not ill to 7=Very severly ill. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT00868959)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.58

[back to top]

Change From Open-label Extension Baseline to Week 24 (Month 6/LOCF Endpoint) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score

"The MADRS is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's level of depression. Ten items are rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of ten items: reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT00868959)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-4.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Who Have Completed 24 Weeks of Extension Study Treatment

Rate of treatment-emergent adverse events in subjects who have completed (ie, reached 6-week endpoint) of Study D1050235 (NCT00868452), Study D1050236 (NCT00868699) or Study D1050292 (NCT01284517) (NCT00868959)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone529

[back to top]

Tolerability and Safety

Number of participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (NCT01143077)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 40/4072
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 40/8087
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 80/8081

[back to top]

Time to Relapse of Psychotic Symptoms During 6 Weeks

"Relapse is defined as any occurrence of:~Insufficient clinical response~Exacerbation of underlying disease~Discontinuation due to an adverse event" (NCT01143077)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventiondays (Mean)
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 40/4023.8
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 40/8016.9
Lurasidone Open-Label Arm 80/8017.3

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Proportions of subjects with AEs, SAEs, and discontinuations due to AEs. (NCT01143090)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Treatment Emergent Adverse EventAny Severe Treatment Emergent Adverse EventTreatment Emergent AE Leading to Discontinuation
Lurasidone Overall981016

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Endpoint (Week 6)

MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT01284517)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-120 mg Flexible Dose+Li/VPA-11.8
Placebo + Li/VPA-10.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) Score (Depression)

CGI-EP-S depression score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT01284517)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-120 mg Flexible Dose+Li/VPA-1.36
Placebo + Li/VPA-1.13

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 6) in: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

SDS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30. Lower values represent a better score, higher values represent a worse score. Similarly, greater negative change from baseline represents improvement, and positive changes from baseline represent worsening. (NCT01284517)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-120 mg Flexible Dose+Li/VPA-5.4
Placebo + Li/VPA-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score

The PANSS-P is a subset of items in the PANSS, an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS-P subscale score is the sum of the 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.2
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode

(NCT01358357)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose16.7
Placebo21.6

[back to top]

Time to All-cause Discontinuation

(NCT01358357)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)

InterventionDays (Median)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose225
Placebo207

[back to top]

Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode

(NCT01358357)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)

InterventionDays (Median)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible DoseNA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase

"A mood event is defined as one of the following during the double-blind phase:~(1) Fulfilled Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive episode. (2) Required treatment intervention for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive symptoms with any antipsychotic (other than study drug), antidepressant, mood stabilizer (other than lithium or divalproex), anxiolytic agents, benzodiazepine (beyond dosage allowed for anxiety, agitation, or insomnia). (3) Psychiatric hospitalization for any bipolar mood episode. (4) Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 18 or Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI BP S) score ≥ 4 at 2 consecutive assessments no more than 10 days apart. (5) Discontinuation from the study because of a mood event (as determined by the Investigator)." (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)

InterventionDays (Median)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible DoseNA
Placebo207

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score

The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose3.0
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score

The QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item self-report measure of depressive symptomatology which uses a computerized assessment interface for administration. The scoring system for the QIDS-SR16 converts responses to 16 separate items into nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains. The nine domains comprise: depressed mood (Item 5); concentration/decision making (Item 10); self outlook (Item 11); suicidal ideation (Item 12); decreased interest (Item 13); decreased energy (Item 14); sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (highest score of Items 1 to 4); appetite/weight disturbance (highest score of Items 6 to 9); and psychomotor disturbance (highest score of Items 15 and 16). The QIDS-SR16 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 domain scores. The QIDS-SR16 total score ranges from 0 to 27 with a high score indicating more severe symptoms. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.9
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score

The CGI-BP-S mania score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of mania illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A high score is associated with greater illness severity (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.10
Placebo0.21

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score

The CGI-BP-S overall score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of overall bipolar illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill, to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.40
Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score

The CGI-BP-S depression score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of depression illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score is associated with a greater illness severity. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.35
Placebo0.42

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score

The PIRS-2 is a 2-item self-report of insomnia assessed via a computer interface. Each item is scored from 0-3. The PIRS-2 total score is calculated as the sum of the 2 items. The PIRS total score ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of insomnia. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.4
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score

The Q-LES-Q-SF is a 16-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living. The questionnaire was developed and validated for use in depressed outpatient subjects and has eight summary scales that reflect major areas of functioning: physical health, mood, leisure time activities, social relationships, general activities, work, household duties and school/coursework. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The Q-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as 100 × (Raw Score - 14 [Minimum Score]) / (70 [Maximum Score] - 14 [Minimum Score]). Higher percent maximum scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose-1.70
Placebo-2.07

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score

The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the 3 items. The SDS total score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of global functional impairments. If a subject has not worked/studied at all during the past week for reasons unrelated to the disorder, the SDS total score will be set to missing. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose0.4
Placebo0.6

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score

the YMRS is an 11-item instrument used to assess the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score). The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 items. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of maia. (NCT01358357)
Timeframe: Double-blind Baseline to week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose1.0
Placebo1.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors (work/school, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibility) in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. These three items are responded to on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging through 0 (no impairment), 1-3 (mild), 4-6 (moderate), 7-9 (marked) and 10 (extreme) disability. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the three items and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). (NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-11.2
Placebo-6.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score

The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the severity of mania. Seven items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, and four items are rated on a 9-point scale, ranging from 0 to 8. The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 individual items and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of mania. (NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-7.0
Placebo-4.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Remission, Defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score of ≤ 12 at Week 6 (LOCF)

(NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone49.1
Placebo23.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Response, Defined as ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF).

(NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone64.8
Placebo30.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Scores

"The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-20.5
Placebo-13.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-1.83
Placebo-1.18

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) Total Score

The HAM-A is used to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology and consists of 14 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe/disabling). The HAM-A total score is calculated as the sum of the 14 individual items and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores are associated with greater degree of anxiety. (NCT01421134)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone-9.9
Placebo-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in CGI-S Score

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of illness (CGI-S) score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: baseline to week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg-0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the HAM-A Total Score

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) is used to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology and consists of 14 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe/disabling). The HAM-A total score is calculated as the sum of the 14 individual items and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores are associated with greater degree of anxiety. (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the YMRS Total Score

The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is an 11-item instrument used to assess the severity of mania. Seven items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, and four items are rated on a 9-point scale, ranging from 0 to 8. The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 items and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of mania. (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg-1.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Scores

"Mean change from baseline to week 12 (LOCF) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores The MADRS is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's level of depression and consists of 10 items. Each item is rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the ten items and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: Baseline to12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg-5.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Percentage of subjects who discontinued due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Percentage of subjects with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg66.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

Percentage of subjects with Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the SDS Total Score

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors (work/school, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibility) in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. These three items are responded to on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging through 0 (no impairment), 1-3 (mild), 4-6 (moderate), 7-9 (marked) and 10 (extreme) disability. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the three items and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). (NCT01423253)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone 20, 40, 60 mg-3.6

[back to top]

Time to First Relapse Event During Double-blind Phase

The Kaplan-Meier method is used for the estimation. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
LurasidoneNA
Placebo192

[back to top]

Smoking Questionnaire (Average Number of Cigarettes Per Day) at Week 28 (LOCF)

Smoking history and frequency were assessed during the study by a research staff member. During the study, smoked subjects were asked about the average number of cigarettes per day they smoked over the last week. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: 28 Weeks - Double Blind Phase

Interventionnumber of cigarettes smoked daily (Mean)
Lurasidone10.0
Placebo8.2

[back to top]

Intent to Attend (ITA) Assessment at Open-label Baseline

"The ITA assessment will be administered by a research staff member. The response is recorded on a 10-point scale, with 0 = Not at all and 9 = Extremely. The ITA allowed the site to capture data regarding dropout risk. The following question was completed at the screening visit: How likely is it that you will complete the study?" (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Open Label Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone7.9
Placebo8.0

[back to top]

Brief Adherence Rating Scale

The Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) is a clinician-administered adherence assessment instrument that consists of four items including three questions and a visual analog rating scale (VAS) to assess the percentage (0 - 100%) of doses taken by the subject in the previous month. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of monthly doses taken (Mean)
Lurasidone98.8
Placebo98.9

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items and three scales: the Positive scale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility; the Negative scale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; and the General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-Blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone8.3
Placebo12.4

[back to top]

EuroQol (EQ-5D): EQ-VAS Score

"The EQ-5D is a self-administered, standardized measure of health states consisting of two parts: EQ-5D descriptive system consisting of one question in each of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety) with three possible response levels per question, classifying patients into one of 243 distinct health states, and a 20-cm visual analogue health status rating.~The 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) has endpoints labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state that are anchored at 100 and 0, respectively. Respondents are asked to indicate how they rate their own health by drawing a line from an anchor box to that point on the EQ-VAS, which best represents their own health on that day." (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone74.5
Placebo68.2

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short Form-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2) Physical Component Score

"The SF-12v2 is a self-administered, multipurpose short-form (SF) generic measure of health status. It was developed to be a shorter, yet valid, alternative to the SF-36 for use in large surveys of general and specific populations as well as in large longitudinal studies of health outcomes. The 12 items in the SF-12v2 are a subset of those in the SF-36; SF-12v2 includes one or two items from each of the eight health concepts with higher scores indicative of higher functioning and better health. The Physical Component Score is a composite of the Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Bodily Pain and General Health scales.~Physical Composite Scores (PCS) is computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health." (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone0.398
Placebo-1.341

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone0.44
Placebo0.74

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Modified Specific Levels of Functioning (SLOF) Total Score

The modified SLOF scale is designed to measure directly observable behavioral functioning and daily living skills of patients with chronic mental illness. The modified SLOF consists of 24 items divided into two subscales: Social functioning (comprised of 7 items from interpersonal relationships section) and Community Living Skills (comprised of 17 items from activities and work skills sections). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale and mapped to 0 to 4 with a higher score indicating worse condition. The total score will be the sum of all 24 items and ranges from 0 to 96. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone0.8
Placebo3.2

[back to top]

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score

"The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone2.5
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Time to All-cause Discontinuation

The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation. (NCT01435928)
Timeframe: Double-blind phase - 28 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Lurasidone148
Placebo115

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent AEs, SAEs or Who Discontinued Due to AEs

Primary Safety assessments included spontaneous adverse event (AE) and serious adverse events (SAEs) monitoring. (NCT01485640)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subject with at least on treatment emergent AESubject with at least one treatment emergent SAESubjects discontinued due to TEAE
Lurasidone63710

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 18 (LOCF) in the Clinical Global Impression Severity Score (CGI-S

The CGI-S score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01485640)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.18

[back to top]

Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS)

The Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) is a clinician-administered adherence assessment instrument that consists of four items including three questions and a visual analog rating scale (VAS) to assess the percentage (0 100%) of doses taken by the subject in the previous month. (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of monthly doses taken (Mean)
Lurasidone99.0

[back to top]

Efficacy - Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score.

The CGI-S score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12 LOCF endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.48

[back to top]

Efficacy - Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12 LOCF endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-8.4

[back to top]

Modified Specific Levels of Functioning (SLOF) Total Score.

The modified SLOF scale is designed to measure directly observable behavioral functioning and daily living skills of patients with chronic mental illness. The modified SLOF consists of 24 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale and mapped to 0 to 4. The total score will be the sum of all 24 items and ranges from 0 to 96. A higher score indicates worse condition. (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-1.8

[back to top]

Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12)

The SF-12v2 is a self-administered, multipurpose short-form (SF) generic measure of health status. It was developed to be a shorter, yet valid, alternative to the SF-36 for use in large surveys of general and specific populations as well as in large longitudinal studies of health outcomes. The 12 items in the SF-12v2 are a subset of those in the SF-36; SF-12v2 includes one or two items from each of the eight health concepts with higher scores indicative of higher functioning and better health. The Physical Component Score is a composite of the Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Bodily Pain and General Health scales. Physical Composite Scores (PCS) is computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12 LOCF endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.45

[back to top]

Safety - Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation, and Serious AEs (SAEs)

Number of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious AEs (SAEs) (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subjects with TEAEsTEASs leading to discontinuationSubjects with TESAEs
Lurasidone72713

[back to top]

Intent to Attend Assessment

"The ITA assessment will be administered by a research staff member. The response is recorded on a 10-point scale, with 0 = Not at all and 9 = Extremely. The ITA allowed the site to capture data regarding dropout risk. The following question was completed at the baseline visit: How likely is it that you will complete the study?" (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone8.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Montgomery -Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score

"The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12 LOCF endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-3.3

[back to top]

Smoking Questionnaire

Smoking questionnaire - average number of cigarettes per day at week 12 (LOCF). (NCT01566162)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnumber of cigarettes smoked daily (Mean)
Lurasidone11.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Depression Scale

The CGI-BP-S depression score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of depression illness severity and range from 1=normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, week 12 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Mania Score

The CGI-BP-S mania score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of mania illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7= Among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, week 12 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the CGI-BP-S Overall Score- Severity of Illness as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S)

Severity of illness as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) -The CGI-BP-S overall score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of overall bipolar illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, week 12 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the MADRS Total Score- Depression as Assessed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

"Depression as assessed by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) -The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of depression." (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline ,Week 12 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Positive Subscale (PANSS P) Score

The PANSS-P is a subset of items in the PANSS, an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS-P subscale score is the sum of the 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the YMRS Total Score -Mania as Assessed by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

Movement disorders as assessed by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) The YMRS is an 11-item instrument used to assess the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score). The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 items. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of mania. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the SDS Total Score

The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the 3 items. The SDS total score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of global functional impairments. If a subject has not worked/studied at all during the past week for reasons unrelated to the disorder, the SDS total score will be set to missing. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, week 12 (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS SR16) Total Score

The QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item self-report measure of depressive symptomatology which uses a computerized assessment interface for administration. The scoring system for the QIDS-SR16 converts responses to 16 separate items into nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains. The nine domains comprise: depressed mood (Item 5); concentration/decision making (Item 10); self outlook (Item 11); suicidal ideation (Item 12); decreased interest (Item 13); decreased energy (Item 14); sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (highest score of Items 1 to 4); appetite/weight disturbance (highest score of Items 6 to 9); and psychomotor disturbance (highest score of Items 15 and 16). The QIDS-SR16 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 domain scores. The QIDS-SR16 total score ranges from 0 to 27 with a high score indicating more severe symptoms. (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks (LOCF)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone-1.0

[back to top]

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events

Number of subjects with treatment emergent AEs, SAEs, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (NCT01575561)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
at Least 1 TEAE potentially related to study drugsubjects with at least one TEAE potentially relateat least 1 treatment emergent SAEat least 1 treatment emergent SAE related to drugat least 1 TEAE leading to discontinuation
Lurasidone155691419

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. A serious adverse event was defined as an AE that met one or more of the following criteria: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening (i.e., a patient was at immediate risk of death at the time of the event, not an event where occurrence in a more severe form might have caused death); Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect; Was an important medical event that might jeopardize the patient or might require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg4
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg3
Placebo3

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient treated with a medicinal (investigational) product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with a start date on or after the date of the first dose through the end of follow-up, or adverse events occurring before the date of first dose and worsening during the treatment or follow-up period. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg103
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg107
Placebo97

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation

(NCT01614899)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg11
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg11
Placebo16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items and three subscales: the Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility; the Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; and the General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 week

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg-17.9
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg-17.3
Placebo-13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Week 6

"CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the participant's current disease state on a 7-point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater severity of the disease.~The change from baseline in CGI-S score (repeated measures) at each visit during the treatment phase is presented for the mITT population" (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg-0.86
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg-0.97
Placebo-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Scores at Week 6

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Positive subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg-5.4
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg-6.2
Placebo-4.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Scores at Week 6

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Negative subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg-3.9
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg-3.4
Placebo-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Scores at Week 6

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The General Psychopathology subscale addresses other 16 symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS General Psychopathology subscale score is the sum of all 16 items and ranges from 16 through 112. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614899)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40mg-8.8
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 80mg-7.9
Placebo-6.3

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. A serious adverse event was defined as an AE that met one or more of the following criteria: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening (i.e., a patient was at immediate risk of death at the time of the event, not an event where occurrence in a more severe form might have caused death); Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect; Was an important medical event that might jeopardize the patient or might require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: EXT baseline and up to 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group31

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient treated with a medicinal (investigational) product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events with a start date on or after the date of initial administration of study drug in the present study through the end of follow-up or adverse events occurring before the date of initial administration of study drug in the present study and worsening during the study treatment in the present study. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: EXT baseline and up to 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group215

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation

(NCT01614912)
Timeframe: EXT baseline and up to 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at LOCF Endpoint

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items and three subscales: the Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility; the Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; and the General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: DB baseline and up to 32 weeks (LOCF endpoint)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group-28.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at LOCF Endpoint

"CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the participant's current disease state on a 7-point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater severity of the disease.~Baseline in the prior study (D1001056, double-blind [DB] baseline) was defined as baseline of the prior study. Baseline in the present study (D1001057, extension [EXT] baseline) was defined as Week 6 in the prior study.~The last post-baseline visit data collected during the study treatment of the present study were carried forward and defined as the last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint." (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: DB baseline and up to 32 weeks (LOCF endpoint)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group-1.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Positive subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: DB baseline and up to 32 weeks (LOCF endpoint)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group-8.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Negative subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: DB baseline and up to 32 weeks (LOCF endpoint)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group-6.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score at LOCF Endpoint

The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The General Psychopathology subscale addresses other 16 symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS General Psychopathology subscale score is the sum of all 16 items and ranges from 16 through 112. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01614912)
Timeframe: DB baseline and up to 32 weeks (LOCF endpoint)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) 40-mg or 80-mg Group-13.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events

Serious adverse event and adverse events data will be listed and summarized as per MedDRA V15.0 (NCT01620060)
Timeframe: 11 Days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lurasidone Oral Tablets105

[back to top]

Lurasidone Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax)

Cmax will be listed and summarized in tabular format (NCT01620060)
Timeframe: Day 1 - pre-dose, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. Day 10/12: 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (ng/mL)-Day 1 20 mg n=16Cmax (ng/mL)-Day 1 40 mg n=24Cmax (ng/mL)-Day 1 80 mg n=55Cmax (ng/mL)-D10/12 20 mg n=16Cmax (ng/mL)-D10/12 40 mg n=21Cmax (ng/mL)-D10/12 80 mg n=17Cmax (ng/mL)-D10/12 120 mg n=16Cmax (ng/mL)-D10/12 160 mg n=13
Lurasidone Oral Tablets24.438.368.23036.28094.299.7

[back to top]

Lurasidone Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Lurasidone AUClast (Day 1) and AUC0-∞ (Day 1) AUC0-24 (Day 10 or Day 12) (NCT01620060)
Timeframe: Day 1 - pre-dose, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. Day 10/12: 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
AUC last (ng.h/mL) -Day 1 20 mg n=16AUC last (ng.h/mL) -Day 1 40 mg n=24AUC last (ng.h/mL) -Day 1 80 mg n=54AUC0-24 (ng.h/mL) -D 10/12 20 mg n=16AUC0-24 (ng.h/mL) -D10/12 40 mg n=21AUC0-24 (ng.h/mL) -D10/12 80 mg n=17AUC0-24 (ng.h/mL) -D10/12 120 mg n=16AUC0-24 (ng.h/mL) -D 10/12 160 mg n=13AUC0-∞(ng.h/mL) -D 1 20 mg n=16AUC0-∞(ng.h/mL) -D 1 40 mg n=19AUC0-∞(ng.h/mL) -D 1 80 mg n=50
Lurasidone Oral Tablets7814030011515438749459083.8153328

[back to top]

Overall Clinical Improvement

Overall psychiatric functioning will be assessed with the improvement (CGI-I) subscales of the CGI. CGI-I items are rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01731119)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Flexible Dose Latuda©2.67

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Side Effects

Assessment of the medication side effects associated with lurasidone (Latuda©) in children and adolescents. (NCT01731119)
Timeframe: Baseline to12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Flexible Dose Latuda©3

[back to top]

Changes in Efficacy Measures

Efficacy measures included the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) total score which focuses on problem behaviors in five subdomains, including irritability, attention, repetitive behaviors, unusual speech, and social withdrawal. Differences in subdomains were not assessed. The ABC-C total score is the sum of 58 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC-C total score ranges from 0 to 174. Higher values of ABC-C total scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01731119)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Flexible Dose Latuda©-14

[back to top]

Change in Weight

Change in weight from Baseline to Week 12 will be assessed as the primary outcome measure. Subjects will be asked to step on a special scale called a tanita which will calculate weight, fat mass at each study visit. (NCT01731119)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionlbs (Mean)
Flexible Dose Latuda©0.70

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Completing Treatment

Data will be collected on why participants terminated the study. If terminated early, the specific reason will be collected such as efficacy or tolerability. (NCT01731119)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Flexible Dose Latuda©7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 for Lurasidone 20 mg and 80-160 mg Versus Placebo.

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg-17.6
Lurasidone 80-160 mg-24.9
Placebo-14.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the MADRS Total Score

"The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ENR Lurasidone 80 mg-2.5
ENR Lurasidone 160 mg-3.5
Placebo-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Compared to the Placebo Group in the Euroqol (EQ-5D) Index Score

The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health state consisting of two parts: a) EQ-5D measuring mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression on a 0 2 scale with lower scores indicating improvement, and b) a 20-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) for health status rating on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating improvement. EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, may be converted into a single summary index (i.e. the EQ-5D index score) by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The EQ-5D Index scores ranged from -0.429 to 1.000. Generally higher observed EQ-5D Index scores indicate a better degree of health. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg0.041
Lurasidone 80-160 mg0.095
Placebo-0.042

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Compared to the Placebo Group in the GAF Score

The GAF is a numeric scale (0 through 100) that measures a patient's overall level of psychological, social, and occupation functioning. It is designed to guide clinicians through a methodical and comprehensive consideration of all aspects of a patient's symptoms and functioning. The scale begins at 100 - superior functioning - to 0 - inadequate information. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg11.5
Lurasidone 80-160 mg15.8
Placebo9.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the Lurasidone 20 mg, and Lurasidone 80 - 160 mg Groups Versus the Placebo Group in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score

"The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity." (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg-2.0
Lurasidone 80-160 mg-3.7
Placebo-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Week 2 to Week 6 for ENR Lurasidone 80 mg vs. ENR Lurasidone 160 mg in CGI-S Score

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7-point scale (0-7), where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. Following a clinical interview, the CGI-S can be completed in 1-2 minutes. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: week 2 to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ENR Lurasidone 80 mg-0.61
ENR Lurasidone 160 mg-0.96

[back to top]

Change From Week 2 to Week 6 for the ENR (Early Non-responders) Lurasidone 160mg Group vs the ENR (Early Non-responders) Lurasidone 80 mg Group in the Following: PANSS Total Score

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: week 2 to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ENR Lurasidone 80 mg-8.9
ENR Lurasidone 160 mg-16.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the CGI-S Score

"The CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7-point scale, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. Following a clinical interview, the CGI-S can be completed in 1-2 minutes.~Reason for the discrepancy of the LS mean (SE) for placebo in outcome 2 and outcome 9 is because the different MMRM model used in outcome 2 and outcome 9. The treatment groups included in the MMRM model for outcome 2 are placebo, lurasidone 20 mg, and lurasidone 80-160 mg. The treatment groups included in the MMRM model for outcome 9 are placebo, ENR lurasidone 80 mg, and ENR lurasidone 160 mg." (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ENR Lurasidone 80 mg-0.83
ENR Lurasidone 160 mg-1.31
Placebo-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 for the ENR Lurasidone 80mg and ENR Lurasidone 160mg Groups vs the Placebo in the PANSS Total Score

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ENR Lurasidone 80 mg-14.4
ENR Lurasidone 160 mg-21.7
Placebo-14.4

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve a Response, Defined as 20% or Greater Improvement From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Score (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6

The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lurasidone 20 mg44
Lurasidone 80-160 mg53
Placebo73

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Week 6 for Lurasidone 20 mg and 80-160 mg Versus Placebo.

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state on a 7-point scale (0-7), where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. Following a clinical interview, the CGI-S can be completed in 1-2 minutes. (NCT01821378)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg-0.93
Lurasidone 80-160 mg-1.30
Placebo-0.73

[back to top]

Proportion of Responders, Where Response is Based on ≥ 20% Improvement From Baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 6

PANSS responder analysis over time: achieving >= 20% reduction from baseline (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: week 6

Interventionnumber of participants (Number)
Lurasidone 40 mg69
Lurasidone 80 mg47
Placebo69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale

"Clinical Global Impression severity (CGI-S): Changes from baseline over time-mixed model for repeated measures- scale from 1-7 - 1=normal, not at all ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, CGIS at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg4.9-0.97
Lurasidone 80 mg4.8-0.92
Placebo4.8-0.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)

"Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) score: summary statistics over time - CGAS is a numeric scale (1 through 100) , where 1 represents the most impaired functioning and 100, superior functioning~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are from an ANCOVA model including factors of treatment, pooled country and age group (stratification factor), and corresponding Baseline score as covariate and LOCF approach." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg44.211.3
Lurasidone 80 mg44.611.9
Placebo43.97.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Excitability Subscale Scores

"Excitability subscale scores (range 4-28): consists of the following four items from the PANSS: excitement, hostility, uncooperativeness, and poor impulse control~Higher values of PANSS Excitability Subscale Score represent greater severity of illness~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, corresponding PANSS subscale score at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg10.8-0.6
Lurasidone 80 mg11.1-1.7
Placebo10.7-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Scores

"PANSS general psychopathology subscale score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures -- General psychopathology (range 16-112): sum of Items G1 to G16 in the general psychopathology subscale -Higher values of PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score represent greater severity of illness~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, corresponding PANSS subscale score at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg46.2-8.1
Lurasidone 80 mg45.5-8.1
Placebo45.0-5.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Scores

"PANSS positive subscale score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures -Positive subscale (range 7-49): sum of Items P1 to P7 in the positive subscale - Higher values of PANSS Positive Subscale Score represent greater severity of illness~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, corresponding PANSS subscale score at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg24.1-6.3
Lurasidone 80 mg24.0-6.3
Placebo23.4-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive, Negative Subscale Scores

"PANSS Negative subscale score: changes form baseline over time - Mixed model for repeated measures - - Negative subscale (range 7-49): sum of Items N1 to N7 in the negative subscale - Higher values of PANSS Negative Subscale Score represent greater severity of illness~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, corresponding PANSS subscale score at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg24.2-4.0
Lurasidone 80 mg24.5-3.8
Placebo24.4-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q)

"PQ-LES-Q percentage maximum possible score: summary statistics over time - PQ-LES-Q % maximum possible score can range from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are from an ANCOVA model including factors of treatment, pooled country and age group (stratification factor), and corresponding Baseline score as covariate and LOCF approach." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: baseline, week 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg51.35.6
Lurasidone 80 mg53.66.1
Placebo52.50.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6.

"PANNS total score: Changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures at week 6 -PANSS total score may range from 30 to 210- Higher values of PANSS total score represent greater severity of illness~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with fixed effects terms for treatment, visit (as a categorical variable), pooled country, age strata, PANSS total score at baseline, and treatment-by-visit interaction." (NCT01911429)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineWeek 6
Lurasidone 40 mg94.5-18.6
Lurasidone 80 mg94.0-18.3
Placebo92.8-10.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 6

The ABC hyperactivity and noncompliance subscale score is the sum of 16 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC hyperactivity and noncompliance subscale score may range from 0 to 48. In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01911442)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily-9.7
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily-6.6
Placebo-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scales (CY-BOCS) Modified for Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs)

CY-BOCS total score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher value of CY-BOCS scores the greater severity of illness. This table is a summary of Y-BOCS compulsion total score. (NCT01911442)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily-1.0
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily-1.0
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) at Week 6

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale is rated on a 7-point scale of severity with 1 = Normal, not at all ill to 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients. Higher values of CGI-S scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01911442)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily-1.1
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily-1.0
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ)

CGSQ is a caregiver reported assessment to assesses extent to which caregivers are affected by special demands associated with caring for a child with emotional/behavioral problems. CGSQ is comprised of three subscales which range in severity from 1 to 5 (Objective Strain, Subjective Externalized Strain, Subjective Internalized Strain), The 3 subscales are calculated as the averages of the corresponding individual items. Higher scores on each indicates greater strain. A Global Strain score is calculated by summing the three subscales (Objective Strain, Subjective Externalized Strain, Subjective Internalized Strain) to provide an indication of the total impact of the special demands on the family. Global Strain scores range from 3 to 15. As with the individual subscales, higher scores indicate greater strain. (NCT01911442)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily-1.49
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily-1.66
Placebo-1.35

[back to top]

Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Subscale Score at Week 6

The ABC irritability subscale score is the sum of 15 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45. Higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01911442)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily8.8
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily9.4
Placebo7.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least 25% Reduction From Baseline to Week 6 in the ABC Irritability Subscale Score.

(NCT01911442)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone 20 mg25
Lurasidone 60 mg26
Placebo23

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Who Have CGI-I Score of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) at Week 6

(NCT01911442)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Lurasidone 20 mg17
Lurasidone 60 mg17
Placebo14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score

Change from Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 The Negative scale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; Negative subscale (range 7-49) is calculated as sum of Items N1 to N7 in the negative subscale Higher values of PANSS sub-scale scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open Label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030120.5-2.6-3.4-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PAR) Total Score

Change from Baseline in PAR Total Score for subjects continued from study D1050326 The PARS is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing over time the severity of anxiety symptoms associated with common DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children ages 6 17 years. The PARS is administered separately to the subject and to the caregiver. The instrument has 2 sections. The first section includes a 50-item symptom checklist, which the clinician rates as present or absent during the past week. The second section is comprised of 7 severity impairment items reflecting the severity/impairment of all symptoms endorsed in Section 1 of the PARS (during the past week). Each question is answered on a 0-5 Likert scale (0 for none, and 1-5 for minimal to extreme) with alternative responses of 8=Not Applicable and 9=Does Not Know. Scores of 8 or 9 are not counted in the summation as per the PARS instructions. The PARS total score over all 7 questions ranges in value from 0 to 35.A higher PARS total score (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503268.0-2.7-3.2-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score

"Change from Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score for subjects continued from study D1050301~The Pediatric Q-LES-Q is a 15-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living, based on the content of the Short From of the Q-LES-Q. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The first 14 items are the same as the General Activities section of the regular Q-LES-Q form and are used to compute the raw score. The PQ-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as follows:~% Max = 100 × (Raw Score - Minimum Score) / (Maximum Score - Minimum Score), where the Minimum Score equals 14 and the Maximum Score equals 70, and the % maximum possible score can range from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better quality of life." (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionpercent of score (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030157.147.489.9811.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score

"Change from Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Percentage Maximum Possible Score for subjects continued from study D1050326~The Pediatric Q-LES-Q is a 15-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living, based on the content of the Short From of the Q-LES-Q. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The first 14 items are the same as the General Activities section of the regular Q-LES-Q form and are used to compute the raw score. The PQ-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as follows:~% Max = 100 × (Raw Score - Minimum Score) / (Maximum Score - Minimum Score), where the Minimum Score equals 14 and the Maximum Score equals 70, and the % maximum possible score can range from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better quality of life." (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032659.528.1611.3714.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression -Severity Score

Change from Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression -Severity Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 The CGI-S is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity, and 7-point scale with range from 1='Normal, not at all ill' to 7='Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503014.0-0.87-1.10-1.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

"Change from Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score for subjects continued from study D1050301.~PANSS is comprised of 30 items and 3 subscales (Positive, Negative, General Psychopathology). An anchored Likert scale from 1 - 7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. Individual items are then summed to determine scores for the 3 subscales, as well as a total score. PANSS Positive subscale score range: 7-49. PANSS Negative subscale score range: 7-49. PANSS General Psychopathology subscale score range: 16-112. PANSS total score range: 30-210 Higher values of PANSS total score represents greater severity of illness." (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open Label BaselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030176.0-11.9-15.6-18.4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs and Serious AEs (SAEs)

The Safety population consists of all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug in this study. (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: During 104 Weeks (2-years) treatment period

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with at least one treatment emergent AESubjects with at least one treatment emergent SAESubjects with AE Leading to Discontinuation
Lurasidone (All Indications)5727877
Rollover From D10503012142828
Rollover From D10503251061318
Rollover From D10503262523731

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score

Change from Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 The Positive scale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness /persecution, and hostility; Positive subscale (range 7-49) is calculated as sum of Items P1 to P7 in the positive subscale Higher values of PANSS sub-scale scores represent greater severity (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open Label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030117.9-3.9-5.1-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Hyperactivity and Noncompliance Subscale Score

"Change from Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity and Noncompliance Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The ABC contains 58 items resolve into five subscales: (1) irritability and agitation (15 items), (2) lethargy and social withdrawal (16 items), (3) stereotypic behavior (7 items), (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance (16 items), and (5) inappropriate speech (4 items). Each item is rated for severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree).~Hyperactivity and noncompliance Subscale Score is calculated as summing of 1, 7, 13, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 31, 38, 39, 44, 48, 51, 54, and 56 items. ABC hyperactivity and noncompliance Subscale Score ranges from 0 to 48.~In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. If one or more items are missing, no imputation was performed and the scores of the subscales that include these items was left missing" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032524.1-3.8-4.3-5.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score

"Change from Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The ABC contains 58 items resolve into five subscales: (1) irritability and agitation (15 items), (2) lethargy and social withdrawal (16 items), (3) stereotypic behavior (7 items), (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance (16 items), and (5) inappropriate speech (4 items). Each item is rated for severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree).~Inappropriate speech Subscale Score is calculated as summing of 9, 22, 33, and 46 items. ABC inappropriate speech Subscale Score ranges from 0 to 12.~In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. If one or more items are missing, no imputation was performed and the scores of the subscales that include these items was left missing" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503255.2-0.7-0.7-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Subscale Score

"Change from Baseline in ABC Irritability Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) contains 58 items resolve into five subscales: (1) irritability and agitation (15 items), (2) lethargy and social withdrawal (16 items), (3) stereotypic behavior (7 items), (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance (16 items), and (5) inappropriate speech (4 items). Each item is rated for severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree).~Irritability Subscale Score is calculated as summing of items 2, 4, 8, 10, 14, 19, 25, 29, 34, 36, 41, 47, 50, 52, and 57; as a result, ABC irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45.~In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. If one or more items are missing, no imputation was performed and the scores of the subscales that include these items was left missing" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032519.0-2.1-2.9-4.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Lethargy and Social Withdrawal Subscale Score

"Change from Baseline in ABC Lethargy and Social Withdrawal Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The ABC contains 58 items resolve into five subscales: (1) irritability and agitation (15 items), (2) lethargy and social withdrawal (16 items), (3) stereotypic behavior (7 items), (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance (16 items), and (5) inappropriate speech (4 items). Each item is rated for severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree).~Lethargy and Social Withdrawal Subscale Score is calculated as summing of items 3, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, 26, 30, 32, 37, 40, 42, 43, 53, 55, and 58. ABC Lethargy and Social Withdrawal Subscale Score ranges from 0 to 48.~In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness. If one or more items are missing, no imputation was performed and the scores of the subscales that include these items was left missing" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Median)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032510.3-0.7-1.1-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Stereotypic Behavior Subscale Score

"Change from Baseline in ABC Stereotypic Behavior Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050325. The ABC contains 58 items resolve into five subscales: (1) irritability and agitation (15 items), (2) lethargy and social withdrawal (16 items), (3) stereotypic behavior (7 items), (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance (16 items), and (5) inappropriate speech (4 items). Stereotypic behavior Subscale Score is calculated as summing of 6, 11, 17, 27, 35, 45, and 49 items . ABC Stereotypic behavior Subscale Score ranges from 0 to 21. Each item is rated for severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree). To score the ABC, the individual items for each subscale are simply summed to their respective totals. It is inappropriate to compute a total aberrant score, based on a summation of all 58 items, as the subscales are largely independent. In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503256.1-0.9-0.9-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficity/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Total Score

Change from Baseline in Attention-Deficity/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Total Score for subjects continued from study D1050326 The ADHD-RS IV is a validated scale that measures the behaviors of children with ADHD. The ADHD-RS IV consists of 18 items reflecting current symptomatology of ADHD based on DSM-IV-TR criteria. Each item is scored from a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0 to 54. The 18 items may be grouped into two sub-scales: hyperactivity/impulsivity (even number items 2 through 18) and inattentiveness (odd number items 1 through 17), ranging from 0 to 27. A higher ADHD-RS total score and sub-scales scores are associated with greater illness severity (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503269.4-2.2-2.4-3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ) Global Strain Score

"Change from Baseline in Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ) Global Strain Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The CGSQ is comprised of total 21 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 (not at all a problem) to 5 (very much a problem)) and is grouped into three subscales: objective strain, subjective externalized strain, and subjective internalized strain. The 3 subscale scores are calculated as the averages of the corresponding individual items, which range in severity from 1 to 5.~Higher scores on each of these subscale scales indicate greater strain. A global strain score is calculated by summing the three subscales (i.e., objective strain, subjective externalized strain, and subjective internalized strain) to provide an indication of the total impact of the special demands on the family. Global strain scores range from 3 to 15. As with the individual subscales, higher scores indicate greater strain" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionscore (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503257.95-0.48-0.60-0.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score

Change from Baseline in CDRS-R Total Score for subjects continued from study D1050326 CDRS-R is a semi-structured, clinician-rated instrument designed for use with children and adolescents between the ages of 6 17 years. It contains 17 ordinally-scaled items that evaluate the presence and severity of symptoms commonly associated with depression in childhood. The CDRS-R is administered separately to the patient and to the caregiver; among 17 items, 14 items are based on separate interviews with child and parent, 3 items are based solely on the rater's observation of child (ie, no questions).The 14 items are rated on a 1 (no psychopathology) to 7 (most psychopathology) scale, where a rating of 3 represents mild psychopathology. The 3 items (sleep disturbance, appetite disturbance, listless speech) are rated on a 1 (no pathology) to 5 (most pathology) scale. The CDRS-R total score ranges from 17-113. In general, higher values of CDRS-R total score represent greater severity of illness (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032639.2-9.9-13.4-16.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Score (CY-BOCS)

"Change from Baseline in CY-BOCS for subjects continued from study D1050325 CY-BOCS used in the study is a modification of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and contains total 7 items for compulsion. Obsessions section was removed as it is difficult to obtain valid information given typical language/cognitive delays in the population. Each item of the compulsive scale ranges from 0 to 4. At this time, item 1b (compulsion-free interval) and item 6 (peculiarity of the behavior) are not being used in the scoring. Item 7 is a rating for reliability, ranging from 0 (excellent) to 3 (poor). It reflects the interview's judgment regarding the confidence in the data collected hence it is not counted in the CY-BOCS total score. The CY-BOCS compulsion total score is the sums of item 1-5. As a result, the CY-BOCS compulsion total score may range from 0 to 20. In general, higher values of CY-BOCS scores represent greater severity of illness" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032510.2-2.2-2.3-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity Score

Change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity Score for subjects continued from study D1050325 The CGI-S is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity, and 7-point scale with range from 1='Normal, not at all ill' to 7='Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503253.9-0.43-0.71-0.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version (CGI-BP-S) Depression Score

Change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version (CGI-BP-S) Depression Score for subjects continued from study D1050326 The CGI-BP-S is a three-question clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state (depression, mania, and overall) using a 7-point scale (1(normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill)) for each question, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D10503263.2-1.10-1.36-1.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score

"Change from Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score for subjects continued from study D1050326 The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) is a numeric scale (1 through 100) used by mental health clinicians to rate the general functioning of children under the age of 18, where 1 represents the most impaired functioning and 100, superior functioning. Each decile (e.g., 1-10, 11-20) has a descriptive header (e.g., Moderate impairment in functioning in most domains) and examples of behaviors and types of environmental accommodations that might be seen at that level of functioning. Scores above 70 on the CGAS indicate functioning within the range of typically developing children of the same age as the child being rated while scores below 60 indicate a definite clinical case" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105032661.111.1714.6718.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-Rated Children's Global Assessment Score (CGAS) Score

"Change from Baseline in Clinician-Rated Children's Global Assessment Score (CGAS) Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) is a numeric scale (1 through 100) used by mental health clinicians to rate the general functioning of children under the age of 18, where 1 represents the most impaired functioning and 100, superior functioning. Each decile (e.g., 1-10, 11-20) has a descriptive header (e.g., Moderate impairment in functioning in most domains) and examples of behaviors and types of environmental accommodations that might be seen at that level of functioning. Scores above 70 on the CGAS indicate functioning within the range of typically developing children of the same age as the child being rated while scores below 60 indicate a definite clinical case" (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030155.010.9414.2817.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS Excitability Subscale Score

Change from Baseline in PANSS Excitability Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 Subscale of Excitability consists of the following four items from the PANSS: excitement, hostility, uncooperativeness, and poor impulse control. The sum of the four items ranges from 4 to 28 Higher values of PANSS sub-scale scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52week 104
Rollover From D10503019.0-1.3-1.7-2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score

Change from Baseline in PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score for subjects continued from study D1050301 The General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation; General psychopathology subscale (range 16-112) is calculated as sum of Items G1 to G16 in the general psychopathology subscale Higher values of PANSS sub-scale scores represent greater severity of illness. (NCT01914393)
Timeframe: Open-Label Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and Week 104

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open label baselineWeek 28Week 52Week 104
Rollover From D105030137.5-5.4-7.2-8.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the YMRS Total Score at Week 6

"YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale) is a clinician-rated assessment of the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.~The YMRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the YMRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The YMRS contains eleven (11) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 11 items." (NCT01986101)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.51
SM-13496 20 - 60 mg/Day-0.98
SM-13496 80 - 120 mg/Day-0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the SDS Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)

"Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score is a subject-rated assessment of a subject's level of functional impairment in work/school, social life and family life/home responsibilities.~The SDS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30. For the SDS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The SDS contains three (3) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 3 items." (NCT01986101)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.7
SM-13496 20 - 60 mg/Day-7.6
SM-13496 80 - 120 mg/Day-6.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the HAM-A Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)

"The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) scale is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology.~The HAM-A total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56. For the HAM-A total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The HAM-A contains fourteen (14) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 14 items." (NCT01986101)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.7
SM-13496 20 - 60 mg/Day-7.4
SM-13496 80 - 120 mg/Day-6.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP-S (Depression) Score at Week 6

"Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) score (depression) is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The CGI depression score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7. For the CGI depression score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome." (NCT01986101)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.11
SM-13496 20 - 60 mg/Day-1.51
SM-13496 80 - 120 mg/Day-1.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6

"Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the MADRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The MADRS contains ten (10) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 10 items." (NCT01986101)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.6
SM-13496 20 - 60 mg/Day-13.6
SM-13496 80 - 120 mg/Day-12.6

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) and Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

The number and percentage of subjects with at least one adverse event and adverse drug reaction (NCT01986114)
Timeframe: 28, 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 20-120mg (Overall, 28 Weeks)352
SM-13496 20-120mg (Japan, 52 Weeks)169

[back to top]

Change From Long Term Study Baseline to LOCF Endpoint in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score

"Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression.~The MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the MADRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The MADRS contains ten (10) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 10 items." (NCT01986114)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks and each month

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 20-120mg (Overall, 28 Weeks)-4.4
SM-13496 20-120mg (Japan, 52 Weeks)1.1

[back to top]

Change From Long Term Study Baseline to LOCF Endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.

"YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale) is a clinician-rated assessment of the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.~The YMRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the YMRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.~The YMRS contains eleven (11) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 11 items." (NCT01986114)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks and each month

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SM-13496 20-120mg (Overall, 28 Weeks)-1.0
SM-13496 20-120mg (Japan, 52 Weeks)-2.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Experienced Recurrence/Relapse of Any Mood Event From Clinical Stability of Bipolar Disorder.

The number and percentage of subjects who experienced recurrence/relapse of any mood event from clinical stability of bipolar disorder. (NCT01986114)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SM-13496 20-120mg (Overall, 28 Weeks)14
SM-13496 20-120mg (Japan, 52 Weeks)18

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Scores.

Mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score from baseline to Week 6 at the end of treatment. PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. It have 30 evaluation items, which include 7 positive sub-scale, 7 negative sub-scale and 16 general psychopathology sub-scale on a score of 1 to 7. The total score is the sum of the 30 scale items. The minimum score is 30 and the maximum score is 210. Patient with PANSS total scores<70 is the normal,but the scores>120 is more serious. (NCT02002832)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 6(day 42).

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone Group-31.2
Risperidone Group-34.9

[back to top]

Mean Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6.

"The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Score is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. Response is rated as one of the following, in which higher scores indicate less improvement or worsening:~1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse." (NCT02002832)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 6(day 42).

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lurasidone Group2.0
Risperidone Group1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Score as Compared to Placebo.

ADHD-RS total score: changes from baseline over time -ANCOVA-LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on ANCOVA. The Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q is a 15-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living, based on the content of the Short From of the Q-LES-Q. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The first 14 items are the same as the General Activities section of the regular Q-LES-Q form and are used to compute the raw score. The PQ-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as follows:% Max = 100 × (Raw Score - Minimum Score) / (Maximum Score - Minimum Score),where the Minimum Score equals 14 and the Maximum Score equals 70, and the % maximum possible score can range from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline and week 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone11.8-2.6
Placebo12.3-2.0

[back to top]

Change in the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score as Compared to Placebo From Double-Blind Baseline to Week 6 (Day 43) Baseline

"CDRS-R total score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures. LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures.~The CDRS-R total score ranges from 17-113. In general, higher values of CDRS-R total score represent greater severity of illness.~The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed between the placebo and treatment group." (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone59.2-21.0
Placebo58.6-15.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) Score as Compared to Placebo.

"PQ-LES-Q percentage maximum possible score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures~LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures" (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone49.611.8
Placebo49.77.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) Score as Compared to Placebo.

PARS score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures-LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures.The PARS is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing over time the severity of anxiety symptoms associated with common DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children ages 6-17 years. The PARS is administered separately to the subject and to the caregiver. The instrument has 2 sections. The first section includes a 50-item symptom checklist, which the clinician rates as present or absent during the past week. The second section is comprised of 7 severity impairment items reflecting the severity/impairment of all symptoms endorsed in Section 1 of the PARS (during the past week). Each question is answered on a 0-5 Likert scale (0 for none, and 1-5 for minimal to extreme) with alternative responses of 8=Not Applicable and 9=Does Not Know. The PAR total score over all 7 questions ranges in value from 0 to 35. (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline and week 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone10.9-3.4
Placebo11.5-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score as Compared to Placebo.

CGAS Score: changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures. LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures. LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline and week 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone48.814.0
Placebo49.59.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar-Severity (CGI-BP-S) Depression Score

Change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar-Severity (CGI-BP-S) depression score changes from baseline over time - mixed model for repeated measures. LS Mean and SE for change from baseline are based on Mixed Model for Repeated Measures.The CGI-BP-S is a three-question clinician-rated assessment of the subject's current illness state (depression, mania, and overall) using a 7-point scale (1(normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill)) for each question, where a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. (NCT02046369)
Timeframe: baseline and week 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
baselineweek 6
Luradisone4.6-1.49
Placebo4.5-1.05

[back to top]

Lurasidone Tmax

Tmax:Time to maximum (peak) drug serum concentration (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Median)
20mg Lurasidone2.00
40mg Lurasidone2.00
80mg Lurasidone1.50

[back to top]

Lurasidone CL/F

CL/F:Apparent total clearance. (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone187
40mg Lurasidone231
80mg Lurasidone212

[back to top]

Lurasidone Cmax

Cmax:Maximum (peak) observed drug serum concentration. (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone32.9
40mg Lurasidone50.9
80mg Lurasidone113

[back to top]

Lurasidone MRT

MRT:Mean residence time. (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone13.2
40mg Lurasidone11.1
80mg Lurasidone11.7

[back to top]

Lurasidone t1/2

t1/2 :Biological half life correlated with the elimination rate constant (kel) of semi-logarithmic concentration-time curve (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone25.5
40mg Lurasidone18.1
80mg Lurasidone18.1

[back to top]

Lurasidone VZ/F

VZ/F: Apparent volume of distribution at terminal phase (correlated with λz) (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone6887
40mg Lurasidone6022
80mg Lurasidone5523

[back to top]

Lurasidone λZ

λZ:Elimination rate constant (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Intervention1/h (Geometric Mean)
20mg Lurasidone0.0271
40mg Lurasidone0.0383
80mg Lurasidone0.0383

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC

AUC:Area under the serum concentration-time curve (NCT02174510)
Timeframe: pre-dose,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC0-24AUC0-tAUC0-∞
20mg Lurasidone90.397.9107
40mg Lurasidone151163174
80mg Lurasidone322353378

[back to top]

Lurasidone Vzss/F

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone10618

[back to top]

Lurasidone λz

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Intervention1/h (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone0.0199

[back to top]

Lurasidone λz

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Intervention1/h (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone0.0360

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratios Lurasidone,Ratio of Cmax,Ratio of AUC0-∞,Ratio of AUC0-τ,

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day 8/Day 1

InterventionRatios (Mean)
Ratio of CmaxRatio of AUC0-∞Ratio of AUC0-τRatio of Cτ
40mg Lurasidone0.941.741.252.52

[back to top]

Summary of Concentration (ng/mL) of Lurasidone - PK Population the Mean (SD) of Day 4 and Day 5

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (-0.5h) of Day4 and Day5

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Day4 Pre-dose (-0.5h)Day5Pre-dose (-0.5h)
40mg Lurasidone0.2771.15

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC0-∞

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone179

[back to top]

Summary of Concentration (ng/mL) of Lurasidone - PK Population the Mean (SD) of Day 6 and Day 7

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (-0.5h) of Day6 and Day7

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Day6 Pre-dose (-0.5h)Day7 Pre-dose (-0.5h)
40mg Lurasidone1.562.00

[back to top]

Lurasidone Vz/F

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone6198

[back to top]

CLss/F

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone211

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC 0-24

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone190

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC 0-24

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone152

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC 0-τ

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone234

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC 0-τ

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone166

[back to top]

Lurasidone AUC0-∞

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionng・h/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone314

[back to top]

Lurasidone CL/F

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone223

[back to top]

Lurasidone Cmax

Maximum (peak) observed drug serum concentration. (NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone48.5

[back to top]

Lurasidone Cmax

Maximum (peak) observed drug serum concentration. (NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone50.2

[back to top]

Lurasidone MRT

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone22.0

[back to top]

Lurasidone MRT

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone12.2

[back to top]

Lurasidone t1/2

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone34.9

[back to top]

Lurasidone t1/2

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
40mg Lurasidone19.3

[back to top]

Lurasidone Tmax

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: Day8 0.5hours pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose in day 8

Interventionh (Median)
40mg Lurasidone1.75

[back to top]

Lurasidone Tmax

(NCT02174523)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48 hours post-dose

Interventionh (Median)
40mg Lurasidone1.50

[back to top]

Brief Assessments of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scores (BACS)

"Mean of cognition was assessed by BACS, which measures neurocognitive function in schizophrenia. BACs is a validated, composite measure of cognition which is used in schizophrenia. It is composed of Verbal memory (range: 0-75), Working memory (range: 0-28), Motor speed (range: 0-100), Verbal Fluency (number of words generated), Information processing (range: 0-110) and Executive functions (range: 0-22).~Higher z-scores indicate a better performance and outcome. BACS composite score are represented as z-scores which can be positive or negative. There is no minimum or maximum as this is a continuous measure." (NCT02199743)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

,
InterventionBACS composite score (z score) (Mean)
Baseline (week 0)week 4
Lurasidone-1.596573107-2.002433521
Non-Lurasidone-1.933853656-1.500292967

[back to top]

Cerebral Glutamate Levels

"Mean values of cerebral glutamate levels was measured by high resolution 3T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Data were acquired from the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) using single voxel localized PRESS (TE1, TE2) = (32, 65) ms with an 8-channel head coil in a 3T whole-body scanner (Philips Medical Systems). Voxel size was 30x20x15 mm3 (9 mL) and were placed over the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). All values are normalized to water.~More negative values represent less cerebral glutamate levels." (NCT02199743)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

,
Interventionrelative unit (RU as compared to water) (Mean)
Baseline (week 0)week 4
Lurasidone-1.434662171-1.412294235
Non-Lurasidone-1.933853656-1.838991525

[back to top]

Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS)

"The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item clinician-administered scale, designed to be particularly sensitive to antidepressant treatment effects in patients with major depression.~Nine of the items are based upon patient report, and one is on the rater's observation during the rating interview. MADRS items are rated on a 0-6 continuum (0=no abnormality, 6=severe)." (NCT02239094)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone (Latuda)24.3

[back to top]

Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) at Week8

"The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item clinician-administered scale, designed to be particularly sensitive to antidepressant treatment effects in patients with major depression.~Nine of the items are based upon patient report, and one is on the rater's observation during the rating interview. MADRS items are rated on a 0-6 continuum (0=no abnormality, 6=severe)." (NCT02239094)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone (Latuda)8

[back to top]

BDM Score (BISS-derived MADRS) Change From Baseline at Day 42

"The study will measure the difference on BISS-derived MADRS score between NRX-101 and lurasidone (comparator) groups. The Bipolar Inventory of Symptom Scale (BISS) is a validated 42-item clinician-rated scale (21 items each for the depression and mania subscales) in which each item is rated on a 0-4 severity scale where higher values indicate worse severity.~BISS-derived MADRS (BDM): MADRS is a 10-item clinician-rated scale, with each item rated on a 0-6 severity scale, where a higher number indicates worse severity. Responses to each question are equally weighted and summed. The BDM has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 40, where higher scores indicate a worse severity, therefore decreases in average BDM are considered a better outcome. Data are presented as mean change from baseline (end of stage 1, Day 1) using LOCF" (NCT02974010)
Timeframe: Day 42

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 28Day 35Day 42
Ketamine Followed by Lurasidone2.44.811.410.011.210.811.0
Ketamine Followed by NRX-1013.32.02.24.53.52.83.7
Saline Followed by Lurasidone0000000
Saline Followed by NRX-101-1.06-0.50.311.01.691.750.38

[back to top]

Concentration at Trough Level (Ctrough) for ASP4345

Ctrough concentration for ASP4345 was reported. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Predose: day 7, day 14, day 21, day 42 and day 84/EoT

,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Day 7 Pre-doseDay 14 Pre-doseDay 21 Pre-doseDay 42 Pre-doseDay 84 Pre-dose
ASP4345 150 mg483.84428.88384.48471.78433.56
ASP4345 50 mg175.041182.903172.040207.145204.914

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Values

SAS scale consists of 10 items including 7 items that address bradykinesia-rigidity and additional single items for tremor, glabellar tap, and salivation. Each item represents a specific physical condition and is rated on a 5-point category rating scale ranging from 0 (complete absence of the condition) to 4 (the condition is present to an extreme degree).The total score is obtained by adding the scores for the 10 individual items making the maximum possible score is 40. Higher scores are indicative of more severe Parkinsonian-type symptoms. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 6Week 12
ASP4345 150 mg000
ASP4345 50 mg000
Placebo000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Values

BARS is used to rate observable, restless movements of drug induced akathisia and subjective awareness of restlessness and any distress associated with the akathisia. BARS consists of the following 4 items: objective assessment of akathisia symptoms, subjective assessment of the participants's awareness of inner restlessness, distress restlessness, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. First three items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no abnormal movements or absence of inner restlessness or no distress) to 3 (severe akathisia or awareness of intense compulsion to move most of the time or severe distress). The last item, the global clinical assessment of akathisia, is rated on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no evidence of akathisia) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total BARS score ranges from 0 to 14 with a higher score representing worse results. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 6Week 12
ASP4345 150 mg000
ASP4345 50 mg000
Placebo000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Values

AIMS is a 14-item scale. Items 1 to 8 are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (no dyskinetic movements) to 4 (severe dyskinetic movements). Item 9 assesses the participant's incapacitation due to abnormal movements, and item 10 assesses the participant's awareness of the abnormal movements and associated distress. Items 9 and 10 are rated on 5-point scales ranging from 0 (none or no awareness) to 4 (severe or aware, severe distress). Items 11 to 14 are yes/no questions regarding the global judgement and dental status of the participant. The total score is the sum of the scores for the 14 items and the possible total score ranges from 0 to 44. A higher total score is indicative of more severe dyskinetic movements. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 6 and week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 6Week 12
ASP4345 150 mg000
ASP4345 50 mg000
Placebo000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Differences in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Values

The C-SSRS is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses are provided to items 1 to 5 for suicidal ideation (1. Wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods [not plan] without intent to act, 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan, 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) and items 6 to 10 for suicide behavior (6. Preparatory acts or behavior, 7. Aborted attempt, 8. Interrupted attempt, 9. Actual attempt, 10. Completed suicide). (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline up to EoS (week 14)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo0
ASP4345 50 mg0
ASP4345 150 mg0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12/EoT in University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment-2 Extended Range (UPSA-2-ER) Total Score

The UPSA-2-ER assesses the functional abilities of the participant with schizophrenia in 6 domains: household management, communication, financial skills, transportation, comprehension/planning and medication management. The UPSA-2-ER total score has a range from 0 to 105. A higher score indicates less impairment. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12/EoT

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.11
ASP4345 50 mg3.86
ASP4345 150 mg2.56

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AE)

Treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug and 28 days after the last dose of study drug. A study drug-related TEAE is defined as any TEAE with at least possible relationship to study treatment as assessed by the investigator or with missing assessment of the causal relationship. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Safety was assessed by AEs, which included abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, metabolic parameters etc.) if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or was clinically significant. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (EoS) (week 14)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEDrug-Related TEAEsSerious TEAEsDrug-Related Serious TEAE
ASP4345 150 mg281110
ASP4345 50 mg281330
Placebo451110

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12/End of Treatment (EoT) in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite Score

The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). The MCCB neurocognitive composite score is a standardized mean of the six domain scores (excluding social cognition). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher score indicates less impairment. (NCT03557931)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12/end of treatment (EoT)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.15
ASP4345 50 mg1.34
ASP4345 150 mg0.87

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC0-last] for Lurasidone After Lurasidone Injectable Suspension Administration

The area Under the Curve from time 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC0-last] for lurasidone after lurasidone injectable suspension administration (NCT03627195)
Timeframe: Day 61

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lurasidone 30 mg628
Lurasidone 75 mg2000
Lurasidone 150 mg3540
Lurasidone 300 mg4910
Lurasidone 450 mg7490
Placebo0

[back to top]

Maximum Serum Concentration [Cmax] for Lurasidone After Lurasidone Injectable Suspension Administration

The maximum Serum Concentration [Cmax] for lurasidone after lurasidone injectable suspension administration (NCT03627195)
Timeframe: Day 61

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lurasidone 30 mg1.08
Lurasidone 75 mg3.90
Lurasidone 150 mg5.08
Lurasidone 300 mg8.85
Lurasidone 450 mg9.50
Placebo0

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs ) Leading to Study Discontinuation

Number of subjects with any Adverse Events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs ) leading to study discontinuation (NCT03627195)
Timeframe: Day 61

,,,,,
Interventioncount of participants (Number)
Incidence of AEsIncidence of SAEsIncidence of AEs leading to study discontinuation
Lurasidone 150 mg200
Lurasidone 30 mg400
Lurasidone 300 mg400
Lurasidone 450 mg500
Lurasidone 75 mg400
Placebo500

[back to top]

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Measures severity of depression symptoms; Scale from 0 to 54; higher numbers mean greater depression severity, so a decrease in score is a better outcome. (NCT03902613)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lurasidone34

[back to top]