Page last updated: 2024-11-11

chlorophyll

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Occurs in Manufacturing Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

chlorophyll a': RN refers to (SP-4-2-(3S-(3alpha(2E,7S*,11S*),4beta,21alpha)))-isomer [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID6449992
MeSH IDM0004175

Synonyms (6)

Synonym
22309-13-3
magnesium, (3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21-(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,13,18-tetramethyl-20-oxo-3-phorbinepropanoato(2-)-n23,n24,n25,n26)-, (sp-4-2-(3s-(3alpha(2e,7s*,11s*),4beta,21alpha)))-
chlorophylls ,
1406-65-1
chlorophyll a'
magnesium;16-ethenyl-11-ethyl-3-methoxycarbonyl-12,17,21,26-tetramethyl-22-[3-oxo-3-[(e)-3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadec-2-enoxy]propyl]-23,24,25-triaza-7-azanidahexacyclo[18.2.1.15,8.110,13.115,18.02,6]hexacosa-1(23),2(6),4,8(26),9,11,13(25),14,16,18(24),19

Research Excerpts

Overview

Chlorophyll content is a key indicator of plant growth and physiological status. objective of this study was to reduce the effect of interspecies competition when estimating Cab content. We evaluated 79 published representative indices to determine the optimal indices for estimating chlorophyll a and b (Cab) content.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"As chlorophyll content is a key indicator of plant growth and physiological status, the objective of this study was to reduce the effect of interspecies competition when estimating Cab content; we evaluated 79 published representative indices to determine the optimal indices for estimating the chlorophyll a and b (Cab) content."( Integrating multiple vegetation indices via an artificial neural network model for estimating the leaf chlorophyll content of Spartina alterniflora under interspecies competition.
Gao, W; Liu, P; Shi, R; Tao, Z; Wang, J; Zeng, Y; Zhang, C, 2017
)
1.18

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fipronil is an effective insecticide, but it presents highly toxic effects in nontarget aquatic organisms."( Enantioselective toxicity and degradation of the chiral insecticide fipronil in Scenedesmus obliguus suspension system.
Huang, LD; Liu, DH; Ma, RX; Qiu, XX; Qu, H; Wang, P; Zhou, ZQ, 2014
)
0.4
" Glycinebetaine foliar application successfully alleviated the toxic effects of Cr on wheat plants and enhanced growth characteristics, biomass, proteins, and chlorophyll contents."( Alleviation of chromium toxicity by glycinebetaine is related to elevated antioxidant enzymes and suppressed chromium uptake and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Adrees, M; Ali, S; Anjum, SA; Anwar, HT; Chaudhary, A; Farid, M; Hayat, T; Irshad, MK; Rizwan, M, 2015
)
0.61
" However, the adverse effect of biochar to aquatic organisms has not received enough attention."( The adverse effect of biochar to aquatic algae- the role of free radicals.
Duan, X; Quan, X; Si, X; Yang, R; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
0.51

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The efficacy of the polyphenols declined with increasing pH, indicating potential polymerization and corresponding reduced bioavailability of the polyphenols."( Natural xenobiotics to prevent cyanobacterial and algal growth in freshwater: contrasting efficacy of tannic acid, gallic acid, and gramine.
Bährs, H; Chakrabarti, S; Laue, P; Steinberg, CE, 2014
)
0.4

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Results of the observations show dose-response relationships could be clearly observed between Pb(Ⅱ) concentration and percentage inhibition (PI)."( Effects of Pb(Ⅱ) exposure on Chlorella protothecoides and Chlorella vulgaris growth, malondialdehyde, and photosynthesis-related gene transcription.
Bi, HS; Chen, L; Cui, XH; Guo, MJ; Lin, KF; Wang, B; Wang, WL; Xiong, B; Zhang, W, 2014
)
0.4
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Occurs in Manufacturing (55 Items)

ItemProcessFrequency
Snackscore-ingredient13
Confectioneriescore-ingredient10
Sweet snackscore-ingredient10
Dietary supplementscore-ingredient6
Plant-based foods and beveragescore-ingredient6
Candiescore-ingredient5
Beveragescore-ingredient5
Plant-based foodscore-ingredient4
Spreadscore-ingredient3
Condimentscore-ingredient2
Breakfastscore-ingredient2
Cheesescore-ingredient2
Fermented milk productscore-ingredient2
Fermented foodscore-ingredient2
Dairiescore-ingredient2
Gummi candiescore-ingredient2
Hummuscore-ingredient2
Dipscore-ingredient2
Saucescore-ingredient2
Salted spreadscore-ingredient2
Plant-based spreadscore-ingredient2
Plant-based beveragescore-ingredient2
Gummy bearscore-ingredient1
Gherkinscore-ingredient1
Pickled cucumberscore-ingredient1
Vegetable-picklescore-ingredient1
Plant-based picklescore-ingredient1
Canned vegetablescore-ingredient1
Vegetables based foodscore-ingredient1
Picklescore-ingredient1
Canned plant-based foodscore-ingredient1
Fruits and vegetables based foodscore-ingredient1
Canned foodscore-ingredient1
Bodybuilding supplementscore-ingredient1
Salted snackscore-ingredient1
Sweetenerscore-ingredient1
Sweet spreadscore-ingredient1
Chocolate candiescore-ingredient1
Cocoa and its productscore-ingredient1
Waterscore-ingredient1
Bonbonscore-ingredient1
Confiseriescore-ingredient1
sucréscore-ingredient1
Dark chocolate dropscore-ingredient1
50-dark-chocolate-dropscore-ingredient1
Fruit gummycore-ingredient1
Turkish delightcore-ingredient1
Candy canescore-ingredient1
Breakfast cerealscore-ingredient1
Cereals and their productscore-ingredient1
Cereals and potatoescore-ingredient1
Crackerscore-ingredient1
Appetizerscore-ingredient1
Salty snackscore-ingredient1
Juices and nectarscore-ingredient1

Research

Studies (170)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199038 (22.35)18.7374
1990's2 (1.18)18.2507
2000's7 (4.12)29.6817
2010's110 (64.71)24.3611
2020's13 (7.65)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 66.98

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index66.98 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.14 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.18 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index211.97 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index3.81 (0.95)

This Compound (66.98)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews2 (1.18%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other168 (98.82%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]