Page last updated: 2024-11-11

avibactam

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

avibactam : A member of the class of azabicycloalkanes that is (2S,5R)-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide in which the amino hydrogen at position 6 is replaced by a sulfooxy group. Used (in the form of its sodium salt) in combination with ceftazidime pentahydrate for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID9835049
CHEMBL ID1689063
CHEBI ID85984
SCHEMBL ID1666807
MeSH IDM0576517

Synonyms (47)

Synonym
avibactam (free acid)
HY-14879
CHEMBL1689063 ,
nxl-104 free acid
nxl104
avibactam
chebi:85984 ,
bdbm50339145
trans-7-oxo-6-(sulfooxy)-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-2-carboxamide
unii-7352665165
1192500-31-4
avibactam [usan:inn]
CS-0593
avibactam [usan]
sulfuric acid, mono((1r,2s,5r)-2-(aminocarbonyl)-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo(3.2.1)oct-6-yl) ester
(1r,2s,5r)-7-oxo-6-sulfooxy-1,6-diazabicyclo(3.2.1)octane-2-carboxamide
avibactam [inn]
zavicefta component avibactam
avibactam [who-dd]
avibactam component of zavicefta
avibactam [mi]
avibactam, (+/-)-
794508-22-8
06mfo7817i ,
unii-06mfo7817i
1,6-diazabicyclo(3.2.1)octane-2-carboxamide, 7-oxo-6-(sulfooxy)-, (1r,2s,5r)-rel-
ave-1330a free acid
396731-14-9
SCHEMBL1666807
(2s,5r)-7-oxo-6-(sulfooxy)-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide
DB09060
AKOS030526076
avibactam free acid
sulfuric acid, mono[(1r,2s,5r)-2-(aminocarbonyl)-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-6-yl] ester
(1r,2s,5r)-2-carbamoyl-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-6-yl hydrogen sulfate
Q15410251
AMY24028
[(2s,5r)-2-carbamoyl-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-6-yl] hydrogen sulfate
gtpl10761
MS-23747
AC-35749
E80372
DTXSID901026066
[(2s,5r)-2-carbamoyl-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-6-yl]oxidanesulfonic acid
1416134-69-4
EN300-22179568
avibactamfreeacid

Research Excerpts

Overview

Avibactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that is combined with aztreonam against Enterobacterales co-expressing serine- and metallo-β-lactsamases (MBL) It is a potent diazobicyclooctane inhibitor of class A and C β-Lactamases. AvibactAm is a novel broad-range β- lactam enzyme inhibitor active against Ambler class A.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Avibactam is a non β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has recently been approved in association with a β-lactam antibiotic for the treatment of severe infections caused by otherwise resistant bacteria. "( Synthetic approaches towards avibactam and other diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitors.
Cariou, K; Peilleron, L, 2020
)
2.29
"Avibactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that is combined with aztreonam against Enterobacterales co-expressing serine- and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). "( Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients.
Baldelli, S; Cattaneo, D; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, M; Galfo, V; Leonildi, A; Menichetti, F; Pai, MP; Tagliaferri, E; Tiseo, G, 2021
)
2.31
"Avibactam is a potent diazobicyclooctane inhibitor of class A and C β-lactamases. "( Inhibition of the
Lee, M; Smith, CA; Stasyuk, A; Stewart, NK; Toth, M; Vakulenko, SB, 2021
)
2.06
"Avibactam is a novel broad-range β-lactamase inhibitor active against Ambler class A (including ESBL and KPC) and some Ambler class C and D (e.g. "( Emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam non-susceptibility in an MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate.
Aepfelbacher, M; Belmar Campos, C; Both, A; Büttner, H; Christner, M; Huang, J; Kluge, S; König, C; Maurer, FP; Perbandt, M; Rohde, H; Wichmann, D, 2017
)
2.2
"Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor for treating complicated urinary tract and respiratory infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens, a serious public health threat. "( Molecular Insights on the Release of Avibactam from the Acyl-Enzyme Complex.
Delgado, EJ; Lizana, I, 2019
)
2.23
"Avibactam is a novel, covalent, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor presently in clinical development in combination with either ceftaroline or ceftazidime."( Structural insight into potent broad-spectrum inhibition with reversible recyclization mechanism: avibactam in complex with CTX-M-15 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AmpC β-lactamases.
Benvenuti, M; De Luca, F; Docquier, JD; Durand-Reville, T; Lahiri, SD; Mangani, S; Sanyal, G, 2013
)
1.33
"Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor with a spectrum of activity that includes β-lactamase enzymes of classes A, C, and selected D examples. "( Kinetics of avibactam inhibition against Class A, C, and D β-lactamases.
Durand-Réville, TF; Ehmann, DE; Fisher, SL; Gao, N; Gu, RF; Hu, J; Jahic, H; Lahiri, S; Livchak, S; Palmer, T; Ross, PL; Thresher, J; Walkup, GK, 2013
)
2.21
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits Ambler class A, C, and some D enzymes."( Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative organisms collected from U.S. medical centers in 2012.
Castanheira, M; Farrell, DJ; Flamm, RK; Jones, RN; Sader, HS, 2014
)
1.39
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that is currently undergoing phase 3 clinical trials in combination with ceftazidime. "( Activities of ceftazidime and avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model.
Borgonovi, M; Coleman, K; Drusano, G; Girard, AM; Levasseur, P; Merdjan, H; Miossec, C; Nichols, WW; Shlaes, D, 2014
)
2.13
"Avibactam is a bridged diazabicyclo [3.2.1]octanone non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor in clinical development that reversibly inactivates serine β-lactamases."( Reclaiming the efficacy of β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: avibactam restores the susceptibility of CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli to ceftazidime.
Bonomo, RA; Chilakala, S; Gatta, JA; Johnson, JK; Papp-Wallace, KM; Taracila, MA; Winkler, ML; Xu, Y, 2014
)
1.36
"Avibactam is a non-β-lactam inhibitor of Ambler class A, class C and some class D β-lactamases that is in clinical development with several β-lactam agents."( Activity of avibactam against Enterobacter cloacae producing an extended-spectrum class C β-lactamase enzyme.
Alm, RA; Giacobbe, RA; Johnstone, MR; Lahiri, SD, 2014
)
1.5
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits a wide range of β-lactamases. "( Avibactam and class C β-lactamases: mechanism of inhibition, conservation of the binding pocket, and implications for resistance.
Alm, RA; Johnstone, MR; Lahiri, SD; McLaughlin, RE; Olivier, NB; Ross, PL, 2014
)
3.29
"Avibactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor that restores the activity of otherwise hydrolyzed β-lactams against Gram-negative bacteria expressing different classes of serine β-lactamases. "( Activities of ceftazidime, ceftaroline, and aztreonam alone and combined with avibactam against isogenic Escherichia coli strains expressing selected single β-lactamases.
Abdelhamed, AM; Bajaksouzian, S; Bonomo, RA; Foster, AN; Gatta, JA; Jacobs, MR; Nichols, WW; Papp-Wallace, KM; Testa, R; Winkler, ML, 2015
)
2.09
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor currently being assessed in combination with ceftazidime, ceftaroline fosamil, and aztreonam. "( Effect of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics and safety of avibactam in healthy volunteers.
Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2015
)
2.1
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor effective against Ambler class A, C and some class D β-lactamases that is currently in clinical development in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. "( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
2.09
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been shown to restore the in vitro activity of ceftazidime against pathogens producing Ambler class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases. "( Phase I study assessing the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam in healthy Japanese volunteers.
Bouw, MR; Das, S; Edeki, T; Learoyd, M; Li, J; Tominaga, N, 2015
)
2.09
"Avibactam is a new non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that shows promising restoration of ceftazidime activity against microorganisms producing Ambler class A extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases such as KPCs, class C β-lactamases (AmpC), and some class D enzymes. "( Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in Neutropenic Mice with Thigh or Lung Infection.
Berkhout, J; Lagarde, CM; Melchers, MJ; Mouton, JW; Nichols, WW; Schuck, VJ; Seyedmousavi, S; van Mil, AC, 2016
)
2.15
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that covalently acylates a variety of β-lactamases, causing inhibition. "( Distinctive Binding of Avibactam to Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria.
Asli, A; Brouillette, E; Krause, KM; Malouin, F; Nichols, WW, 2016
)
2.19
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that, in combination with ceftazidime, has recently obtained regulatory approval in the USA."( Structural and sequence analysis of class A β-lactamases with respect to avibactam inhibition: impact of Ω-loop variations.
Alm, RA; Bradford, PA; Lahiri, SD; Nichols, WW, 2016
)
1.39
"Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor intended for use as a fixed-dose combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of certain serious Gram-negative infections. "( Phase 1 Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetic Profile and Safety of Avibactam in Patients With Renal Impairment.
Das, S; Li, J; Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2017
)
2.13
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor being developed in combination with ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. "( Impact of defined cell envelope mutations in Escherichia coli on the in vitro antibacterial activity of avibactam/β-lactam combinations.
Huband, MD; McLeod, SM; Nichols, WW; Patey, SA, 2017
)
2.11
"Avibactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that is in clinical development, combined with β-lactam partners, for the treatment of bacterial infections comprising gram-negative organisms. "( Avibactam is a covalent, reversible, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor.
Ehmann, DE; Fisher, SL; Gu, RF; Hu, J; Jahić, H; Kern, G; Ross, PL; Walkup, GK, 2012
)
3.26

Effects

Avibactam has an unusual mechanism of action. It is a covalent inhibitor that acts via ring opening. In contrast to other currently used β-lactamase inhibitors, this reaction is reversible.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Avibactam has an unusual mechanism of action: it is a covalent inhibitor that acts via ring opening, but in contrast to other currently used β-lactamase inhibitors, this reaction is reversible."( Avibactam and class C β-lactamases: mechanism of inhibition, conservation of the binding pocket, and implications for resistance.
Alm, RA; Johnstone, MR; Lahiri, SD; McLaughlin, RE; Olivier, NB; Ross, PL, 2014
)
2.57
"Avibactam has a spectrum of inhibition of class A and C β-lactamases, including ESBLs, AmpC and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes."( Spotlight on ceftazidime/avibactam: a new option for MDR Gram-negative infections.
Falcone, M; Paterson, D, 2016
)
1.46

Actions

Avibactam displays potent inhibition of extended-spectrum, AmpC, KPC and some OXA β-lactamases. It does not inhibit MBLs and binds only weakly to most of them. In some cases, it undergoes slow hydrolysis of one of its urea N-CO bonds followed by loss of CO2.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Avibactam displays potent inhibition of extended-spectrum, AmpC, KPC and some OXA β-lactamases. "( In vitro susceptibility of characterized β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria isolated in Japan to ceftazidime-, ceftaroline-, and aztreonam-avibactam combinations.
Aoki, K; Ishii, Y; Nichols, WW; Tateda, K; Testa, R; Yoshizumi, A, 2015
)
2.06
"Avibactam does not inhibit MBLs and binds only weakly to most of the MBLs tested; in some cases, avibactam undergoes slow hydrolysis of one of its urea N-CO bonds followed by loss of CO2, in a process different from that observed with the SBLs studied."( Interaction of Avibactam with Class B Metallo-β-Lactamases.
Abboud, MI; Brem, J; Claridge, TD; Damblon, C; Frère, JM; Gilbert, B; Mercuri, P; Rydzik, AM; Schofield, CJ; Smargiasso, N, 2016
)
1.51

Toxicity

aroline fosamil/avibactam well tolerated at total daily doses of up to 1,800 mg of each compound. All adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for ceftazidime and metronidazole.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Adverse events were observed in 67."( Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis, in hospitalized adults: results of a prospective, investigator-blinded, randomized study.
Duttaroy, DD; González Patzán, LD; Kreidly, Z; Lipka, J; Sable, C; Stricklin, D; Vazquez, JA, 2012
)
0.66
" Infusions of ceftaroline fosamil/avibactam were well tolerated at total daily doses of up to 1,800 mg of each compound, and all adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity."( Single- and multiple-dose study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline fosamil in combination with avibactam in healthy subjects.
Rank, D; Riccobene, TA; Su, SF, 2013
)
0.87
" The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole (64."( Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, Phase II trial.
Lipka, J; Lucasti, C; Popescu, I; Ramesh, MK; Sable, C, 2013
)
0.86
" The most common adverse event was administration/venipuncture site bruising (6 events); all adverse events were mild."( Effect of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics and safety of avibactam in healthy volunteers.
Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.66
"No serious or severe adverse events were reported in either study."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.65
" There were no deaths or serious adverse events."( Phase I study assessing the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam in healthy Japanese volunteers.
Bouw, MR; Das, S; Edeki, T; Learoyd, M; Li, J; Tominaga, N, 2015
)
0.65
" Adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study.
Arenz, D; Calbo, E; Cisneros, JM; Cornely, OA; Horcajada, JP; Jiménez-Jorge, S; Luckey, A; O'Brien, S; Queckenberg, C; Raber, S; Rodríguez-Hernández, MJ; Rosso-Fernández, CM; Tallón-Aguilar, L; Torre-Cisneros, J; Turner, G; Zettelmeyer, U, 2020
)
0.82
"Many antibiotics are well known for being associated with adverse events (AEs) of central nervous system, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations."( Central nervous system adverse events of ceftazidime/avibactam: A retrospective study using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Cui, X; Guo, M; Guo, X; Li, J, 2022
)
1.18

Pharmacokinetics

azidime/avibactam and fosfomycin in clinical and isogenic Escherichia coli strains carrying genes coding for several carbapenemases or ESBLs.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Dose fractionation experiments identified that "time > threshold" was the pharmacodynamic index linked to cell kill and resistance suppression."( Pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibition by NXL104 in combination with ceftaroline: examining organisms with multiple types of β-lactamases.
Brown, D; Castanheira, M; Critchley, I; Drusano, GL; Grasso, C; Jones, RN; Kulawy, R; Liu, W; Louie, A; Thye, D; Vanscoy, B; Williams, G, 2012
)
0.38
" No significant differences in systemic exposure of ceftaroline or avibactam were observed when the drugs were administered alone versus concomitantly, indicating that there was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between ceftaroline fosamil and avibactam administered as a single dose."( Single- and multiple-dose study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline fosamil in combination with avibactam in healthy subjects.
Rank, D; Riccobene, TA; Su, SF, 2013
)
0.83
" To determine possible clinical use, it is important to know the pharmacokinetic profiles of the compounds related to each other in plasma and the different compartments of infection in experimentally infected animals and in humans."( Pharmacokinetics and penetration of ceftazidime and avibactam into epithelial lining fluid in thigh- and lung-infected mice.
Berkhout, J; Lagarde, CM; Melchers, MJ; Mouton, JW; Nichols, WW; Seyedmousavi, S; van Mil, AC, 2015
)
0.67
" Pharmacokinetic measurements included Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-∞, plasma clearance, and t½."( Effect of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics and safety of avibactam in healthy volunteers.
Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.66
" Mean Cmax was similar in young male, young female, and elderly female subjects (33."( Effect of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics and safety of avibactam in healthy volunteers.
Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.66
" Concomitant ceftazidime did not affect avibactam's safety and pharmacokinetic profile."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.92
" Pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) understanding of this combination is critical for optimal clinical dose selection."( Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination: a novel approach for aztreonam/avibactam.
Bradford, PA; Eakin, AE; Harris, JJ; Kim, A; McLaughlin, RE; O'Donnell, JP; Patey, S; Singh, R; Tanudra, MA, 2015
)
0.63
" To determine optimal dosing combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam for treating infections with ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic responses were explored in murine neutropenic thigh and lung infection models."( Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in Neutropenic Mice with Thigh or Lung Infection.
Berkhout, J; Lagarde, CM; Melchers, MJ; Mouton, JW; Nichols, WW; Schuck, VJ; Seyedmousavi, S; van Mil, AC, 2016
)
0.95
"Using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model we simulated human drug concentration-time courses associated with ceftaroline 600 mg every 8 h and ceftazidime 2000 mg every 8 h."( The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection.
Bowker, K; MacGowan, A; Noel, A; Tomaselli, S, 2017
)
0.76
"As AUC is a much easier and more reliable pharmacokinetic measure than C max , it would be useful to explore how AUC-based indices for avibactam exposures could be used for translating the results of the present study into patients' therapy."( The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection.
Bowker, K; MacGowan, A; Noel, A; Tomaselli, S, 2017
)
0.97
"Our objective was to develop population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for ceftazidime and avibactam in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of healthy volunteers and to compare ELF concentrations to plasma PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in the Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid of Healthy Volunteers.
Das, S; Dimelow, R; MacPherson, M; Newell, P; Wright, JG, 2018
)
0.95
" The focus of this review was to provide clinical pharmacokinetic data of avibactam to cover absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion aspects including any potential for avibactam to show drug-drug interactions in the clinic."( Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Avibactam, A Newly Approved non-β lactam β-lactamase Inhibitor Drug, In Combination Use With Ceftazidime.
Giri, P; Patel, H; Srinivas, NR, 2019
)
1.01
" aeruginosa to compare different pharmacodynamic indices derived from simulated human avibactam exposures, with respect to their degree of correlation with the modelled bacterial responses."( A model-based analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Derendorf, H; Nichols, WW; Schuck, VJ; Sy, SKB; Xia, H; Zhuang, L, 2019
)
0.97
"Checkerboard experiments followed by fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index determinations are commonly used to assess in vitro pharmacodynamic interactions between combined antibiotics, but FIC index cannot be determined in case of antibiotic/non-active compound combinations."( Pharmacodynamic modelling of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor checkerboard data: illustration with aztreonam-avibactam.
Buyck, J; Chauzy, A; Couet, W; de Jonge, BLM; Grégoire, N; Marchand, S, 2019
)
0.73
" The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of avibactam could reduce or close the mutant selection window (MSW) of aztreonam in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring MBLs; MSW is a pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter for the selection of emergent resistant mutants."( Aztreonam/avibactam effect on pharmacodynamic indices for mutant selection of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring serine- and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases.
Dong, D; Feng, K; Gong, H; Jia, N; Liu, Y; Lv, Z; Martins, FS; Sy, S; Sy, SKB; Yu, M; Zhang, J; Zhu, P; Zhu, S; Zhu, Y, 2021
)
1.26
" Extensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets for ceftazidime and avibactam obtained during the adult clinical development program were used to iteratively select, modify, and validate the approved adult dosage regimen (2,000-500 mg by 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours (q8h), with adjustments for renal function)."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Pediatric Patients Aged 3 Months and Older.
Bradley, JS; Carrothers, TJ; Chan, PLS; Franzese, RC; Lovern, M; McFadyen, L; Raber, S; Riccobene, T; Vourvahis, M; Watson, KJ, 2022
)
1.17
"The objective of this pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) for the treatment of pulmonary infections by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa using optimized two-step administration therapy (OTAT) and traditional infusion (TI)."( Evaluation of the Efficacy of Optimized Two-Step-Administration Therapy with Ceftazidime/Avibactam for Treating Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pulmonary Infections: a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis.
Cui, J; Kang, Y, 2023
)
1.33
"In this study, a systematic analysis of the pharmacodynamic interactions of ceftazidime/avibactam and fosfomycin in clinical and isogenic Escherichia coli strains carrying genes coding for several carbapenemases or ESBLs was performed and pharmacodynamic interactions were quantified by modelling and simulations."( Evaluation of in vitro pharmacodynamic drug interactions of ceftazidime/avibactam and fosfomycin in Escherichia coli.
Decousser, JW; Grégoire, N; Kroemer, N; Martens, M; Nordmann, P; Wicha, SG, 2023
)
1.36

Compound-Compound Interactions

Avibactam is being evaluated in combination with various β-lactam antibiotics to treat serious bacterial infections. MIC(90) values (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibits 90% of the isolates) of ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii and Morganella morganii were reduced up to 128-fold or greater.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The in vitro activity of ceftazidime in combination with NXL104 versus 470 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates was evaluated using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methods."( In vitro activity of ceftazidime combined with NXL104 versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD 2009 study).
DeCorby, M; Hoban, DJ; Karlowsky, JA; Lagacé-Wiens, PR; Walkty, A; Zhanel, GG, 2011
)
0.37
"Ceftaroline exhibits in vitro activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-, AmpC-, and KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae when combined with the novel β-lactamase inhibitor NXL104."( In vivo efficacy of a human-simulated regimen of ceftaroline combined with NXL104 against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
Crandon, JL; Furtado, GH; Nicolau, DP; Williams, G; Wiskirchen, DE, 2011
)
0.37
" In this evaluation, we examined organisms carrying defined β-lactamases and identified doses and schedules of NXL104 in combination with the new cephalosporin ceftaroline, which would maintain good bacterial cell kill and suppress resistance emergence for a clinically relevant period of 10 days in our hollow-fiber infection model."( Pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibition by NXL104 in combination with ceftaroline: examining organisms with multiple types of β-lactamases.
Brown, D; Castanheira, M; Critchley, I; Drusano, GL; Grasso, C; Jones, RN; Kulawy, R; Liu, W; Louie, A; Thye, D; Vanscoy, B; Williams, G, 2012
)
0.38
"The objective of this study was to investigate the in vitro antibacterial activity of avibactam (formerly NXL104) in combination with imipenem, cefepime or ceftazidime against Gram-negative bacteria."( In vitro activity of avibactam (NXL104) in combination with β-lactams against Gram-negative bacteria, including OXA-48 β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Aktaş, Z; Kayacan, C; Oncul, O, 2012
)
0.92
" In this study, the activity of NXL104 in combination with the third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime (CAZ) and ceftriaxone (CRO) or with piperacillin (PIP) was evaluated against 316 anaerobic bacteria."( Anti-anaerobic activity of a new β-lactamase inhibitor NXL104 in combination with β-lactams and metronidazole.
Dubreuil, LJ; Mahieux, S; Miossec, C; Neut, C; Pace, J, 2012
)
0.38
"This study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous doses of ceftaroline fosamil administered in combination with the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam in healthy adults."( Single- and multiple-dose study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline fosamil in combination with avibactam in healthy subjects.
Rank, D; Riccobene, TA; Su, SF, 2013
)
0.78
"Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler class A, class C, and some class D enzymes is being evaluated in combination with various β-lactam antibiotics to treat serious bacterial infections."( Assessment of the mass balance recovery and metabolite profile of avibactam in humans and in vitro drug-drug interaction potential.
Atherton, J; Clarkson-Jones, J; Das, S; Edeki, T; Gupta, A; Mair, S; Vishwanathan, K, 2014
)
2.08
" MIC(90) values (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibits 90% of the isolates) of ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii and Morganella morganii were reduced up to 128-fold or greater when combined with avibactam."( In vitro activity of ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam alone and in combination with avibactam against European Gram-negative and Gram-positive clinical isolates.
Cantón, R; Giani, T; Morosini, MI; Nichols, WW; Nordmann, P; Rossolini, GM; Seifert, H; Stefanik, D; Testa, R, 2015
)
0.81
"Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor effective against Ambler class A, C and some class D β-lactamases that is currently in clinical development in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
2.09
" Avibactam, a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, has been combined with ceftaroline or ceftazidime but these two combinations have not been directly compared."( The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection.
Bowker, K; MacGowan, A; Noel, A; Tomaselli, S, 2017
)
1.67
"The in vitro activity of anti-pseudomonal β-lactams in combination with avibactam was evaluated against 54 multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients."( In vitro activity of β-lactams in combination with avibactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter xylosoxidans isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis.
Compain, F; Grohs, P; Mathy, V, 2018
)
0.97
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of CAZ-AVI alone and in combination with fosfomycin and carbapenems against KPC-Kp clinical isolates by E-test method."( In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Alone and in Combination With Fosfomycin and Carbapenems Against KPC-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae.
Carone, G; Dalfino, L; De Robertis, A; Del Prete, R; Mosca, A; Romanelli, F; Stufano, M, 2020
)
0.84
"To evaluate the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam and zidebactam, against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates."( In vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with newly developed β-lactamase inhibitors against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases.
Le Terrier, C; Nordmann, P; Poirel, L, 2022
)
0.94
" This study investigated the activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) against a national multi-centre study collection of strains co-producing MBLs and SBLs."( Activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from Spain.
Alonso-Garcia, I; Álvarez-Fraga, L; Arca-Suárez, J; Beceiro, A; Bou, G; Cendón-Esteve, A; Guijarro-Sánchez, P; Lasarte-Monterrubio, C; Maceiras, R; Martínez-Guitián, M; Outeda, M; Peña-Escolano, A; Vázquez-Ucha, JC, 2023
)
0.91
"Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model."( In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii.
Echols, R; Gill, CM; Longshaw, C; Nicolau, DP; Santini, D; Takemura, M; Yamano, Y, 2023
)
1.35
" In this study, we analyzed the in vitro activity of those novel antibacterial agents alone or in combination with polymyxin B against the CR-A."( In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam alone or in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Gu, Y; Hu, D; Hu, M; Liang, R; Wang, D; Wang, M; Zhu, M, 2023
)
1.19
"The broad synergistic in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and fosfomycin confirms the potential of the application of this drug combination in clinics."( Evaluation of in vitro pharmacodynamic drug interactions of ceftazidime/avibactam and fosfomycin in Escherichia coli.
Decousser, JW; Grégoire, N; Kroemer, N; Martens, M; Nordmann, P; Wicha, SG, 2023
)
1.39
" The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with CR-GNB infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) combined with colistin from October 2019 to February 2023 in China."( Ceftazidime/avibactam combined with colistin: a novel attempt to treat carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infection.
Gong, F; Liu, J; Lu, L; Shao, Z; Shi, K; Tang, S; Zheng, Z, 2023
)
1.49
"Thirty-one patients were treated with CAZ/AVI combined with colistin."( Ceftazidime/avibactam combined with colistin: a novel attempt to treat carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infection.
Gong, F; Liu, J; Lu, L; Shao, Z; Shi, K; Tang, S; Zheng, Z, 2023
)
1.29

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Part 2 assessed bioavailability of avibactam after a single oral dose (500 mg) relative to a single 30-min intravenous infusion (500 mg)."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.93
" Herein, we describe the synthesis and testing of the first approved BLI to be rendered orally bioavailable since clavulanic acid (1984)."( Orally Absorbed Derivatives of the β-Lactamase Inhibitor Avibactam. Design of Novel Prodrugs of Sulfate Containing Drugs.
Duncton, MAJ; Gallop, MA; Gordon, EM, 2018
)
0.73
" Reported here is a novel, orally bioavailable diazabicyclooctane (DBO) β-lactamase inhibitor."( Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
Carter, NM; Chen, A; Chen, Y; Comita-Prevoir, J; Durand-Réville, TF; Giacobbe, RA; Lahiri, SD; May-Dracka, TL; McLeod, SM; Miller, AA; Mueller, JP; O'Donnell, JP; Romero, JAC; Sacco, MD; Shapiro, AB; Tommasi, RA; Verheijen, JC; Wu, F; Wu, X; Zhang, J, 2020
)
0.56

Dosage Studied

Both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are only available as intravenous formulations and are dosed 3 times daily in patients with normal renal function. A humanized aztreonam dose of 2 g every 6 h (1-h infusion) was evaluated alone and in combination with avibactsam at 375 or 600 mg every 6 hours.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" This combination dosing regimen should allow for optimal bacterial cell kill (highest likelihood of successful clinical outcome) and the suppression of resistance emergence."( Pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibition by NXL104 in combination with ceftaroline: examining organisms with multiple types of β-lactamases.
Brown, D; Castanheira, M; Critchley, I; Drusano, GL; Grasso, C; Jones, RN; Kulawy, R; Liu, W; Louie, A; Thye, D; Vanscoy, B; Williams, G, 2012
)
0.38
" A humanized aztreonam dose of 2 g every 6 h (1-h infusion) was evaluated alone and in combination with avibactam at 375 or 600 mg every 6 h (1-h infusion), targeting the percentage of the dosing interval in which free-drug concentrations remained above the MIC (fT>MIC)."( Human simulated studies of aztreonam and aztreonam-avibactam to evaluate activity against challenging gram-negative organisms, including metallo-β-lactamase producers.
Crandon, JL; Nicolau, DP, 2013
)
0.86
"5 g avibactam every 8 h administered as a 2-h infusion or a ceftazidime regimen that produced a specific epithelial lining fluid (ELF) percentage of the dosing interval in which serum free drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT>MIC) against 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates within a neutropenic murine pneumonia model and to assess the impact of host infection on pulmonary pharmacokinetics."( Efficacies of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine lung infection model.
Crandon, JL; Housman, ST; Nichols, WW; Nicolau, DP, 2014
)
1.26
" Our discussion includes the importance of selecting the appropriate partner β-lactam and dosing regimens for these promising agents."( New β-lactamase inhibitors: a therapeutic renaissance in an MDR world.
Bonomo, RA; Drawz, SM; Papp-Wallace, KM, 2014
)
0.4
" However, the small differences observed between the young and elderly cohorts are not sufficient to warrant dosing adjustments based on age."( Effect of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics and safety of avibactam in healthy volunteers.
Merdjan, H; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.66
" After a 7-day washout, subjects in the 250 and 500 mg dosing groups received a second avibactam dose with concomitant ceftazidime 1000 or 2000 mg, respectively."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
0.87
"Avibactam was generally well tolerated across all dosing regimens, when given alone or with ceftazidime."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
Merdjan, H; Rangaraju, M; Tarral, A, 2015
)
2.09
"Six clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates expressing MBLs and ESBLs were studied in an in vitro hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) using various dosing regimens simulating human-like PK for aztreonam/avibactam."( Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination: a novel approach for aztreonam/avibactam.
Bradford, PA; Eakin, AE; Harris, JJ; Kim, A; McLaughlin, RE; O'Donnell, JP; Patey, S; Singh, R; Tanudra, MA, 2015
)
0.81
"The aim of this Phase 1, open-label study (NCT01395420) was to measure and compare concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam in bronchial epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and plasma, following administration of two different dosing regimens in healthy subjects."( Phase 1 study assessing the steady-state concentration of ceftazidime and avibactam in plasma and epithelial lining fluid following two dosing regimens.
Armstrong, J; Das, S; Edeki, T; Learoyd, M; Li, J; Nicolau, DP; Siew, L, 2015
)
0.86
" To determine optimal dosing combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam for treating infections with ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic responses were explored in murine neutropenic thigh and lung infection models."( Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in Neutropenic Mice with Thigh or Lung Infection.
Berkhout, J; Lagarde, CM; Melchers, MJ; Mouton, JW; Nichols, WW; Schuck, VJ; Seyedmousavi, S; van Mil, AC, 2016
)
0.95
" Both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are only available as intravenous formulations and are dosed 3 times daily in patients with normal renal function."( Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.
Bonomo, RA; van Duin, D, 2016
)
1.07
" Ceftazidime and avibactam ELF exposures exceeded their respective plasma PK/PD time-above-threshold targets by the dosing interval mid-point in most subjects."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in the Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid of Healthy Volunteers.
Das, S; Dimelow, R; MacPherson, M; Newell, P; Wright, JG, 2018
)
1.07
" Based on the review of the data, the pharmacokinetics of avibactam was generally stationary in the studied dosing regimen."( Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Avibactam, A Newly Approved non-β lactam β-lactamase Inhibitor Drug, In Combination Use With Ceftazidime.
Giri, P; Patel, H; Srinivas, NR, 2019
)
1.03
" aeruginosa was used to simulate bacterial responses to modelled human exposures from fractionated avibactam dosing regimens with a fixed ceftazidime dosing regimen (2 or 8 g q8h as a 2-h infusion)."( A model-based analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Derendorf, H; Nichols, WW; Schuck, VJ; Sy, SKB; Xia, H; Zhuang, L, 2019
)
0.96
"To develop a novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model for ceftazidime/avibactam against Gram-negative pathogens, with the potential for combination dosage simulation."( A novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model describing ceftazidime/avibactam efficacy against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.
Bissantz, C; Haldimann, A; Kristoffersson, AN; Nielsen, EI; Okujava, R; Shi, T; Walter, I; Zampaloni, C, 2020
)
1
" A PKPD model was developed and evaluated using internal and external evaluation, and combined with a population PK model and applied in dosage simulations."( A novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model describing ceftazidime/avibactam efficacy against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.
Bissantz, C; Haldimann, A; Kristoffersson, AN; Nielsen, EI; Okujava, R; Shi, T; Walter, I; Zampaloni, C, 2020
)
0.78
" The model could describe an extensive external Pseudomonas aeruginosa data set with minor modifications to the enhancer effect, and the utility of the model for clinical dosage simulation was demonstrated by investigating the influence of the addition of avibactam."( A novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model describing ceftazidime/avibactam efficacy against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.
Bissantz, C; Haldimann, A; Kristoffersson, AN; Nielsen, EI; Okujava, R; Shi, T; Walter, I; Zampaloni, C, 2020
)
0.96
" pneumoniae ARLG-1002 (blaNDM-1, blaCTXM-15, blaDHA, blaSHV, blaTEM) were studied in the HFIM using simulated human dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam."( Determining the optimal dosing of a novel combination regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam against NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae using a hollow-fibre infection model.
Boissonneault, KR; Bonomo, RA; Bulitta, JB; Chambers, HF; Eakin, AE; Fowler, VG; Holden, PN; Lodise, TP; O'Donnell, N; Smith, NM; Tao, X; Tsuji, BT; Zhou, J, 2020
)
0.99
" In the prospective validation experiments, ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam dosed every 8 and 6 h, respectively (ceftazidime/avibactam 2/0."( Determining the optimal dosing of a novel combination regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam against NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae using a hollow-fibre infection model.
Boissonneault, KR; Bonomo, RA; Bulitta, JB; Chambers, HF; Eakin, AE; Fowler, VG; Holden, PN; Lodise, TP; O'Donnell, N; Smith, NM; Tao, X; Tsuji, BT; Zhou, J, 2020
)
1.03
" The best-fit parameter values were used to predict %T > MICi associated with CAZ/AVI exposures expected in peritoneal fluid after standard dosing (2."( MIC profiling of ceftazidime/avibactam against two carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.
Eales, BM; Lasco, TM; Merlau, PR; Sofjan, AK; Tam, VH; Wang, W; Zidaru, A, 2020
)
0.85
" This case illustrates the importance of TDM, and the logistical issues encountered with the use of alternative dosing strategies in pediatric patients with CF."( Optimization of Aztreonam in Combination With Ceftazidime/Avibactam in a Cystic Fibrosis Patient With Chronic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Case Study.
Cowart, MC; Ferguson, CL, 2021
)
0.87
" Optimal dosing of aztreonam with avibactam is not well-defined in critically ill patients and contingent on ceftazidime/avibactam product labelling."( Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients.
Baldelli, S; Cattaneo, D; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, M; Galfo, V; Leonildi, A; Menichetti, F; Pai, MP; Tagliaferri, E; Tiseo, G, 2021
)
1.15
"To identify a pragmatic dosing strategy for aztreonam with avibactam to maximize the probability of target attainment (PTA)."( Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients.
Baldelli, S; Cattaneo, D; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, M; Galfo, V; Leonildi, A; Menichetti, F; Pai, MP; Tagliaferri, E; Tiseo, G, 2021
)
1.11
" Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis coupled with Monte Carlo simulations were used to create a dosing nomogram for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam based on drug-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) targets."( Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients.
Baldelli, S; Cattaneo, D; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, M; Galfo, V; Leonildi, A; Menichetti, F; Pai, MP; Tagliaferri, E; Tiseo, G, 2021
)
1.07
" For aztreonam/avibactam dosing regimens evaluated in clinical trials, fT>MPC values were >90% and >80%, whereas fTMSW measures were <10% and <20% in plasma and ELF, respectively."( Aztreonam/avibactam effect on pharmacodynamic indices for mutant selection of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring serine- and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases.
Dong, D; Feng, K; Gong, H; Jia, N; Liu, Y; Lv, Z; Martins, FS; Sy, S; Sy, SKB; Yu, M; Zhang, J; Zhu, P; Zhu, S; Zhu, Y, 2021
)
1.38
" Extensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets for ceftazidime and avibactam obtained during the adult clinical development program were used to iteratively select, modify, and validate the approved adult dosage regimen (2,000-500 mg by 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours (q8h), with adjustments for renal function)."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Pediatric Patients Aged 3 Months and Older.
Bradley, JS; Carrothers, TJ; Chan, PLS; Franzese, RC; Lovern, M; McFadyen, L; Raber, S; Riccobene, T; Vourvahis, M; Watson, KJ, 2022
)
1.17
" Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is urgently needed to optimize dosage regimens to maximize efficacy, minimize toxicity, and delay the emergence of resistance."( Rapid, simple, and economical LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of ceftazidime and avibactam in human plasma and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring.
Cai, Y; Chen, M; Cheng, Y; Li, X; Lin, H; Liu, M; Qiu, H; Que, W; Zhang, B; Zhang, H, 2022
)
0.94
" aeruginosa, quantitative reductions in bacterial density observed with the translational murine model suggest that the phenotypic profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem is predictive of clinical efficacy when using the evaluated dosing regimens."( In vivo translational assessment of the GES genotype on the killing profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Fraile-Ribot, PA; Gill, CM; Nicolau, DP; Oliver, A, 2022
)
1.13
"The objective of this pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) for the treatment of pulmonary infections by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa using optimized two-step administration therapy (OTAT) and traditional infusion (TI)."( Evaluation of the Efficacy of Optimized Two-Step-Administration Therapy with Ceftazidime/Avibactam for Treating Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pulmonary Infections: a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis.
Cui, J; Kang, Y, 2023
)
1.33
" We used a novel framework to provide insights of optimal dosing exposure of ceftazidime/avibactam."( Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Eales, BM; Hudson, CS; Kline, EG; Merlau, PR; Shields, RK; Smith, J; Sofjan, AK; Tam, VH, 2022
)
1.27
" Using the best-fit parameter values, %fT>MICi was estimated for various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam."( Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Eales, BM; Hudson, CS; Kline, EG; Merlau, PR; Shields, RK; Smith, J; Sofjan, AK; Tam, VH, 2022
)
1.26
" The novel framework is informative and may be used to guide optimal dosing of other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations."( Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Eales, BM; Hudson, CS; Kline, EG; Merlau, PR; Shields, RK; Smith, J; Sofjan, AK; Tam, VH, 2022
)
1.04
"The present report firstly described a critically ill patient receiving a dosing regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) (1."( A therapeutic regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam for a critical patient receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy.
Cao, XY; Chen, SY; Jin, Y; Liu, WH; Ni, M; Qiu, YS; Shen, CR; Shen, FM; Yan, YY, 2023
)
1.4
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (3)

RoleDescription
antibacterial drugA drug used to treat or prevent bacterial infections.
antimicrobial agentA substance that kills or slows the growth of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoans.
EC 3.5.2.6 (beta-lactamase) inhibitorAn EC 3.5.2.* (non-peptide cyclic amide C-N hydrolase) inhibitor that interferes with the action of beta-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6).
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
monocarboxylic acid amideA carboxamide derived from a monocarboxylic acid.
ureas
azabicycloalkane
hydroxylamine O-sulfonic acid
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (6)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Beta-lactamase Escherichia coliKi0.01100.01100.03350.0560AID1657152
Beta-lactamaseEnterobacter cloacaeIC50 (µMol)0.10000.10001.87457.7000AID584977
Beta-lactamaseEnterobacter cloacaeKi7.70007.30007.50007.7000AID584988
Beta-lactamasePseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1IC50 (µMol)0.12800.12801.69164.6000AID584978
Beta-lactamase TEMEscherichia coliIC50 (µMol)0.00190.00191.761810.0000AID1758321
Beta-lactamase Acinetobacter baumanniiKi1.70001.70001.70001.7000AID1657160
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Beta-lactamaseEnterobacter cloacaeK5.10005.10005.10005.1000AID584990
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Bioassays (146)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1657157Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli SHV-12 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID584982Ratio of Kinact/K for Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase P99 by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1559343Inhibition of KPC-2/SHV12/TEM-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0361 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1525996Inhibition of NDM-1 in Escherichia coli 5980 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antimicrobial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC incubated for 18 to 20 hrs by CLSI based method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-26, Volume: 62, Issue:18
Heteroaryl Phosphonates as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Both Serine- and Metallocarbapenemases.
AID1740625Inhibition of beta lactamase P99 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559333Inhibition of OXA-232/OXA-9/TEM-1A/CTX-M-15/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0066 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559320Inhibition of bacterial NDM-1 using cefepime as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740604Inhibition of beta lactamase TEM-1 in Escherichia coli assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 60 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559337Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0457 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559340Inhibition of NDM-1/CMY-6/OXA-1 in Escherichia coli CDC-0055 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559311Inhibition of bacterial VIM-2 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559403Volume of distribution at steady state in mouse at 10 mg/kg, iv after 1 to 6 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1657168Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP1081 NDM-1 assessed as minimum concentration of compound required to reduce the MIC of biapenem to 1 ug/ml2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559323Inhibition of VIM-27/CTX-M-15/SHV-11/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0040 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559353Inhibition of VIM-1/VIM-2/VIM-4/NDM-1 in Escherichia coli assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 to 512 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740603Inhibition of beta lactamase TEM-1 in Escherichia coli assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1701469Antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter baumannii expressing OXA-23 by broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559310Inhibition of bacterial OXA-48 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID584988Inhibition of Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase P99 after 5 seconds incubation with nitrocefin substrate by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1740627Inhibition of bacterial OXA-23 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559338Inhibition of KPC-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA 1705 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740608Inhibition of beta lactamase OXA-48 in Klebsiella pneumoniae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 60 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1740619Inhibition of bacterial CTX-M-14 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559355Inhibition of VIM-1/VIM-2/VIM-4/NDM-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 to 512 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559319Inhibition of bacterial OXA-1 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1657244Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP1081 NDM-1 assessed as minimum concentration of compound needed to reduce the MIC of biapenem to 1 ug/ml2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559354Inhibition of VIM-1/VIM-2/VIM-4/NDM-1 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 to 512 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740626Inhibition of bacterial OXA-10 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1701462Potentiation of meropenem-induced antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing TEM-1/SHV-11/KPC-3 assessed as meropenem MIC at 4 ug/ml by broth microdilution method (Rvb = 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1740629Inhibition of bacterial OXA-48 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559341Inhibition of OXA-232/OXA-9/TEM-1A/CTX-M-15/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0066 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1758320Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase KPC-2 (29 - 289) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1649583Antimicrobial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates by standard broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-11, Volume: 63, Issue:11
A γ-Lactam Siderophore Antibiotic Effective against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.
AID1657152Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli KPC-2 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition and measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometric analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID584973Inhibition of beta-lactamase SHV-4 assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID584979Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-1 assessed as inactivation rate constant by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1758325Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase VIM-1 (27 - 266) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1657160Inhibition of Acinetobacter baumannii OXA-23 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1657241Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP1004 KPC-2 assessed as minimum concentration of compound needed to reduce the MIC of biapenem to 1 ug/ml2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559339Inhibition of VIM-27/CTX-M-15/SHV-11/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0040 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559309Inhibition of bacterial AmpC using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1758326Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase SFH-1 (3 - 234) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559357Inhibition of VIM-1/VIM-2/VIM-4/NDM-1 in Acinetobacter baumannii assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 to 512 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559328Inhibition of NDM in Escherichia coli CDC-0452 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740622Inhibition of bacterial SHV-5 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1701453Half life in rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1701463Potentiation of meropenem-induced antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing SHV-11/OXA-121 assessed as meropenem MIC at 4 ug/ml by broth microdilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1526000Inhibition of VIM-2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4698 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antimicrobial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC incubated for 18 to 20 hrs by CLSI based method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-26, Volume: 62, Issue:18
Heteroaryl Phosphonates as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Both Serine- and Metallocarbapenemases.
AID1657162Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli IMP-1 using imipenem as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 30 secs for 30 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1740607Inhibition of beta lactamase OXA-48 in Klebsiella pneumoniae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559318Inhibition of bacterial CMY-2 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740606Inhibition of beta lactamase AmpC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 60 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559321Inhibition of bacterial IMP-1 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1657159Inhibition of Acinetobacter baumannii OXA-48 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID584980Inhibition of Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase P99 assessed as inactivation rate constant by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1677277Potentiation of aztreonam-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 88949 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in aztreonam MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1657158Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli AmpC using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1758324Inhibition of bacterial New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1 (1- 270) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1740628Inhibition of bacterial OXA-24 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559331Inhibition of VIM-27/CTX-M-15/SHV-11/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0040 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1649582Antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates by standard broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-11, Volume: 63, Issue:11
A γ-Lactam Siderophore Antibiotic Effective against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.
AID1559334Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0356 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1701504Clearance in rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1701466Antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing TEM-OSBL/CTX-M-14/OXA-48 by broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID584978Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-lactamase AmpC assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1701468Antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing SHV-11/OXA-181 by broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559324Inhibition of NDM-1/CMY-6/OXA-1 in Escherichia coli CDC-0055 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740630Inhibition of Escherichia coli PBP2 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki by SDS-PAGE based fluorescence assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID584977Inhibition of Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase P99 assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1740610Antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae ARC561 assessed as reduction in bacterial growth by CLSI based broth dilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1677276Potentiation of aztreonam-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 107092 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in aztreonam MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1701464Potentiation of meropenem-induced antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter baumannii expressing OXA-23 assessed as meropenem MIC at 4 ug/ml by broth microdilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559401Half life in mouse at 10 mg/kg, iv after 1 to 6 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740609Antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli ARC3627 assessed as reduction in bacterial growth by CLSI based broth dilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1525999Inhibition of NDM-1 in Enterobacter cloacae 5981 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antimicrobial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC incubated for 18 to 20 hrs by CLSI based method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-26, Volume: 62, Issue:18
Heteroaryl Phosphonates as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Both Serine- and Metallocarbapenemases.
AID1677272Potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 88949 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1559336Inhibition of NDM in Escherichia coli CDC-0452 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 64 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1758323Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase OXA-48 (1 - 265) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1740605Inhibition of beta lactamase AmpC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate incubated for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1578811Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-4 in Klebsiella pneumoniae 25637 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1559326Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0356 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1758321Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase TEM-1 (24 - 286) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559356Inhibition of VIM-1/VIM-2/VIM-4/NDM-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 to 512 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1578814Inhibition of Beta-lactamase PER-1 in Escherichia coli KB10 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb >64 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1525997Inhibition of KPC2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae 4683 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antimicrobial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC incubated for 18 to 20 hrs by CLSI based method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-26, Volume: 62, Issue:18
Heteroaryl Phosphonates as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Both Serine- and Metallocarbapenemases.
AID1677271Potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 107092 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1559329Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0457 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 64 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1657153Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli OXA-48 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition and measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometric analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1701454Inhibition of beta lactamase AmpC in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID584990Inhibition of Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase P99 assessed as dissociation constant by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1701465Antibacterial activity against Enterobacter cloacae expressing TEM-1/KPC-2 by broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559325Inhibition of OXA-232/OXA-9/TEM-1A/CTX-M-15/OXA-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0066 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1578810Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae IP1 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1559317Inhibition of bacterial CTX-M-15 using cefotaxime as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID584987Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-1 after 5 seconds incubation with nitrocefin substrate by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1559316Inhibition of bacterial SHV-5 using cefotaxime as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1758322Inhibition of bacterial Beta-lactamase AmpC (20 - 377) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 41Discovery of 3-aryl substituted benzoxaboroles as broad-spectrum inhibitors of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1559344Inhibition of NDM in Escherichia coli CDC-0452 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1701461Potentiation of meropenem-induced antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing TEM-OSBL/CTX-M-14/OXA-48 assessed as meropenem MIC at 4 ug/ml by broth microdilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID584975Inhibition of beta-lactamase CTX-M-15 assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1559322Inhibition of KPC-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA 1705 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1657154Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli NDM-1 using imipenem as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition and measured every 30 secs for 30 mins by spectrophotometric analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1677278Potentiation of aztreonam-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 86052 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in aztreonam MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1740621Inhibition of bacterial KPC-2 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559342Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0356 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1578813Inhibition of Beta-lactamase SHV-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae IP86 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb = 64 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1320839Inhibition of native signal containing Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 at 1.5 uM using nitrocefin substrate pre-incubated for 5 mins before substrate addition2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-09, Volume: 59, Issue:11
Screening and Design of Inhibitor Scaffolds for the Antibiotic Resistance Oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48) through Surface Plasmon Resonance Screening.
AID1657155Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli CTX-M-14 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1701460Potentiation of meropenem-induced antibacterial activity against Enterobacter cloacae expressing TEM-1/KPC-2 assessed as meropenem MIC at 4 ug/ml by broth microdilution method (Rvb = 8 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1740612Inhibition of beta-lactamase activity in Klebsiella pneumoniae ARC561 assessed as MIC for cefpodoxime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml by CLSI based broth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1559332Inhibition of NDM-1/CMY-6/OXA-1 in Escherichia coli CDC-0055 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1677275Potentiation of aztreonam-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 108590 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in aztreonam MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1559402AUC (infinity) in mouse at 10 mg/kg, iv after 1 to 6 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559345Inhibition of KPC-2/PDC-42 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa CDC-0457 assessed as meropenem antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1740620Inhibition of bacterial CTX-M-15 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1578809Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-1 in Escherichia coli GN5482 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb = 4 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1657166Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP1004 KPC-2 assessed as minimum concentration of compound needed to reduce the MIC of aztreonam to 4 ug/ml2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1677270Potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 108590 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1578812Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-8 in Escherichia coli CF3 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC (Rvb = 64 ug/ml)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-10, Volume: 62, Issue:19
Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again!
AID1701455Inhibition of beta lactamase CTXM-15 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559404Clearance in mouse at 190 mg/kg, iv after 1 to 6 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559335Inhibition of KPC-2/SHV12/TEM-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0361 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 32 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID584974Inhibition of beta-lactamase KPC-2 assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1701457Inhibition of beta lactamase OXA-48 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1657156Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli TEM-10 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1701503AUC in rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1740624Inhibition of beta lactamase AmpC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1657161Inhibition of recombinant Escherichia coli VIM-1 using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured every 10 secs for 10 mins by spectrophotometrically analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID1701456Inhibition of beta lactamase TEM-1 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1677273Potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 86052 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1740611Inhibition of beta-lactamase activity in Escherichia coli ARC3627 assessed as MIC for cefpodoxime antibacterial activity at 4 ug/ml by CLSI based broth dilution method (Rvb >64 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1677274Potentiation of aztreonam-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 109084 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in aztreonam MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1701505Volume of distribution in rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1525998Inhibition of NDM-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae 5979 assessed as potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antimicrobial activity by measuring ceftazidime MIC incubated for 18 to 20 hrs by CLSI based method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-26, Volume: 62, Issue:18
Heteroaryl Phosphonates as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Both Serine- and Metallocarbapenemases.
AID584976Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM- 1 assessed as nitrocefin hydrolysis after 5 mins enzyme-compound preincubation2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1657243Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP1086 OXA-48 assessed as minimum concentration of compound needed to reduce the MIC of biapenem to 1 ug/ml2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 63, Issue:14
Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases.
AID584981Ratio of Kinact/K for beta-lactamase TEM-1 by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1559308Inhibition of bacterial KPC-2 using imipenem as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by susbtrate addition and measured after 10 mins by spectrophotometric method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1559330Inhibition of KPC-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA 1705 assessed as cefepime antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb = 16 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
AID1677269Potentiation of ceftazidime-induced antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 109084 clinical isolate assessed as fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC at 8 uM2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 30, Issue:21
Overcoming β-Lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using non-canonical tobramycin-based antibiotic adjuvants.
AID1701459Inhibition of bacteria beta lactamase OXA-23 assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID584989Inhibition of beta-lactamase TEM-1 assessed as dissociation constant by spectrophotometry2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Dec, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.
AID1740623Inhibition of bacterial TEM-1 assessed as ratio of Kinact/Ki using nitrocefin as chromogenic substrate by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-12, Volume: 63, Issue:21
Discovery of an Orally Available Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitor (ETX0282) of Class A, C, and D Serine β-Lactamases.
AID1701467Antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing TEM-1/SHV-11/KPC-3 by broth microdilution method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1701458Inhibition of beta lactamase KPC-2 in Enterobacter cloacae assessed as decrease in enzyme activity using nitrocefin as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 10 mins by fluorescence plate reader analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Discovery of
AID1559327Inhibition of KPC-2/SHV12/TEM-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae CDC-0361 assessed as piperacillin antibacterial activity at 16 ug/ml after 16 to 20 hrs by CLSI-based microbroth dilution method (Rvb > 128 ug/ml)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (357)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's2 (0.56)29.6817
2010's168 (47.06)24.3611
2020's187 (52.38)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 85.36

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index85.36 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.93 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index147.44 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (85.36)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials16 (4.44%)5.53%
Reviews22 (6.11%)6.00%
Case Studies12 (3.33%)4.05%
Observational8 (2.22%)0.25%
Other302 (83.89%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (42)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Four Way Crossover Phase I Study to Investigate the Effect on QT/QTc Interval of a Single Dose of Intravenous Ceftazidime NXL104 (3000/2000 mg) or Ceftaroline Fosamil NXL104 (1500/2000 mg), Co [NCT01290900]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of NXL104 Alone and in Combination With Ceftazidime Administered as Single and Repeated Intravenous Doses in Healthy Japa [NCT01291602]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Retrospective Analysis to Characterize the Real World Use Patterns, Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-avibactam in the Management of Gram Negative Infections. [NCT04628572]204 participants (Actual)Observational2021-01-29Completed
Evaluation of Ceftazidime-avibactam Plus Aztreonam in Patients Infected by MBL-producing Enterobacterales and CRISPR/Cas9-based Strategy for Curing Drug-resistant Genes [NCT05850871]427 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-06Recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Coadministered Ceftaroline Fosamil and NXL104 Versus Intravenous Doripenem in Adult Subjects With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection [NCT01281462]Phase 2217 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Comparing Oral Versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Trial [NCT05977868]Phase 4135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-04Enrolling by invitation
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, Formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Thera [NCT01595438]Phase 3598 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, MULTI-CENTER, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT (BAT) IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS DUE TO CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE PATHOGEN [NCT04882085]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-26Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study in Healthy Adults to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AVYCAZ(R) in Combination With Aztreonam (COMBINE) [NCT03978091]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-09Completed
Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Injectable TQD3606 in a Single Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single, Multiple Dosing in Healthy Subjects, and to Explore Urinary Ex [NCT05340530]Phase 156 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Not yet recruiting
Impact of Ceftazidime / Avibactam Treatment vs Better Available Therapy on Mortality of Patients With Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteria [NCT04167228]348 participants (Actual)Observational2019-10-01Completed
Dose Optimization by PK/PD of Antibiotics to Improve Clinical Outcome of CRKP Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients and in Vitro Study of Monotherapy, Combination Therapy and Molecular Biology of Drug Resistance at Phramongkutklao Hospital: Pr [NCT05862402]Phase 476 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-07Recruiting
Prospective, Multicenter, Investigator-blinded, Randomized, Comparative Study Estimate Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy of NXL104/Ceftazidime vs. Comparator Followed Appropriate Oral Therapy Treatment Complicated UTI Hosp Adults [NCT00690378]Phase 2137 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Phase I Open-Label, 2-Part, 3-Cohort, Single-Centre Study to Assess the Concentration of Avibactam and Ceftazidime in Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF) and Plasma Using at Least Two Different Dosing Regimens in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01395420]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Comparative Study to Estimate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of NXL104/Ceftazidime Plus Metronidazole vs. Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Adu [NCT00752219]Phase 2204 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Clinical Study on Monitoring the Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients [NCT05413343]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-01-01Recruiting
A Phase I, 2-Part, Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic and Drug-Drug Interaction Study of CAZ104 (Avibactam and Ceftazidime in Healthy Subjects) [NCT01430910]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Real-World Study of Ceftazidime-Avibactam to Characterize the Usage in Clinical Practice [NCT05487586]450 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-10-20Recruiting
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-DOSE STUDY TO ASSESS THE PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) IN CHILDREN FROM 3 MONTHS TO LESS THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE WHO ARE HOSPITALIZED AND RECEIVING SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY FOR S [NCT04040621]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-15Terminated(stopped due to Following regulatory consultation, the Sponsor has decided to terminate the study and analyze the current dataset. The decision to terminate was solely based on a business decision, not due to safety concerns.)
A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED,OPEN-LABEL, COMPARATIVE STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF AZTREONAM- AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI) AND BEST AVAILABLE THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS DUE TO MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT GRAM- NEGATIVE BACTERI [NCT03580044]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-25Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment of patients with serious infections caused by gram-negative bacteria producing MBL has been challenging. Date study terminated: 16-Dec-2022.)
Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime-avibactam Among Critically-ill Patients Receiving Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration [NCT04358991]20 participants (Actual)Observational2017-01-01Completed
AN OPEN-LABEL, PARALLEL-GROUP, PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF MULTIPLE INTRAVENOUS DOSES OF AZTREONAM AND AVIBACTAM IN SUBJECTS WITH SEVERE RENAL IMPAIRMENT AND NORMAL RENAL FUNCTION [NCT04486625]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-10Completed
A SINGLE ARM, OPEN-LABEL, MULTI-CENTER, INTERVENTIONAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) IN CHINESE ADULTS WITH HAP (INCLUDING VAP) [NCT04774094]Phase 4235 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-21Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-dose Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline Fosamil/Avibactam in Adults With Augmented Renal Clearance [NCT01624246]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Nosocomial Infections in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [NCT05566665]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-01-01Recruiting
A PHASE 2A MULTICENTER, OBSERVER-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED 2 ARM STUDY TO INVESTIGATE PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM ± METRONIDAZOLE COMPARED TO BEST AVAILABLE THERAPY (BAT) IN PEDIATRIC PARTICIPANTS 9 MON [NCT05639647]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
An Open Label Single-Dose Study in Healthy Male Subjects Designed to Assess the Mass Balance Recovery, Metabolite Profile and Metabolite Identification of [14C]NXL104 [NCT01448395]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Study of Avycaz (Ceftazidime/Avibactam) Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in Critically Ill Patients [NCT02822950]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in CF [NCT02504827]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Single Blind, Randomised, Multi-centre, Active Controlled, Trial To Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics And Efficacy Of Ceftazidime And Avibactam When Given In Combination With Metronidazole, Compared With Meropenem, In Children From 3 Month [NCT02475733]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-01Completed
A Single Blind, Randomised, Multi-centre, Active Controlled, Trial To Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics And Efficacy Of Ceftazidime And Avibactam Compared With Cefepime In Children From 3 Months To Less Than 18 Years Of Age With Complicated [NCT02497781]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-24Completed
Study on Tolerance, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of YK-1169 in Healthy Volunteers [NCT05588531]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-20Completed
A PHASE I, SINGLE CENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY TO ASSESS THE PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM ADMINISTERED AS SINGLE AND REPEATED INTRAVENOUS DOSES IN HEALTHY CHINESE PARTICIPANTS [NCT04973826]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-20Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdo [NCT01726023]Phase 3486 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase I, Randomised, Double-blind, 3-Part Study in Healthy Young and Elderly Subjects to Assess the Safety and Tolerability, and Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of Aztreonam and Avibactam Given Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) [NCT01689207]Phase 1222 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Comparative Study Between Usage of Meropenem/Gentamicin Versus Ceftazidime/Avibactam in the Treatment of ARDS Induced by Both Lung Trauma and VAP [NCT04402359]200 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2018-07-05Completed
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Colistin in Critically Ill Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections (AVI-ICU): A Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05258851]Phase 3168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A PHASE 2A, 2-PART, OPEN-LABEL, NON-RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DOSE TRIAL TO EVALUATE PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CEFTAZIDIME AND AVIBACTAM IN NEONATES AND INFANTS FROM BIRTH TO LESS THAN 3 MONTHS OF AGE WITH SUSPECTED O [NCT04126031]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-14Terminated(stopped due to Following regulatory consultation, the Sponsor has decided to terminate the study and analyze the current dataset. The decision to terminate was solely based on a business decision, not due to safety concerns.)
: Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients With Renal Failure Requiring Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration [NCT03243864]10 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-03-13Recruiting
An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, Formerly CAZ104) and Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Infections Due to Ceftazidime Resistant Gram Negative Pathogens [NCT01644643]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicentre, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Including Ventilator-A [NCT01808092]Phase 3969 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, Formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Thera [NCT01599806]Phase 3641 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Microbiological Outcome at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Clinical Outcome in CE Patients at the Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Clinical Outcome in CE Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Clinical Outcome in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Patients at the End of Intravenous (IV) Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Cloacae in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Cloacae in ME Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the TOC Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit
NCT00690378 (20) [back to overview]Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the End of Intravenous (IV) Therapy
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the Late Follow-up Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response in CE Participants at the End of IV Therapy
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response in CE Participants at the Late Follow-up Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Response in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Participants at the Test of Cure Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the End of IV Therapy
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure Visit
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00752219 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Late Follow-up Visit
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (CE at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (CE at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01595438 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (CE at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (CE at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
NCT01599806 (63) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT in EME at EOT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) in Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set.
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at Follow-up 2 (FU2) in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at TOC by Baseline Gram-negative Pathogen in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at Follow-up 1 (FU1) in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at EOT in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (EME) at EOT Analysis Set.
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) in mMITT Analysis Set.
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at TOC by Previously Failed Treatment Class in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam - cIAI in PK Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]The 28 Days All Cause Mortality Rate in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]The Reason for Treatment Change/Discontinuation in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU2 in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU1 in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at TOC by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU2 in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]The 28 Days All Cause Mortality Rate in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU1 in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at EOT in mMITT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at EOT in EME at EOT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Response at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set.
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at TOC by Baseline Gram-negative Pathogen in EME at TOC Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at FU2 by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at FU2 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at FU1 by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at FU1 Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Clinical Cure at EOT by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at EOT Analysis Set
NCT01644643 (38) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam - cUTI in PK Analysis Set
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]Safety Profile - Number of Subjects With at Least 1 AE
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUC (ug*h/mL) for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Cmax for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter t1/2(h) for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Tmax for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) on Day 1 in Parts A, B and C
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Vss for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C
NCT01689207 (7) [back to overview]PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameters CL and CLr for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability:ECG , QTcB and QTcF Intervals
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability: Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Hematology.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability: Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Clinical Chemistry.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability by Incidence: Extent of Exposure.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability by Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events and Mortality.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Time to First Defervescence in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set for Patients Who Have Fever at Study Entry.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Time to First Defervescence in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set for Patients Who Have Fever at Study Entry.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response in the Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response in the Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable(ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01726023 (41) [back to overview]The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses)
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set at Day 28
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set
NCT01808092 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at TOC Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses)
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cephalosporin Class Effects and Additional Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Day 7
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter QTcF: > 450, >480 and >500 Millisecond (ms)
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR): Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Ceftazidime and Avibactam
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of 72 Hours Treatment: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02475733 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at TOC: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at TOC
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at EOT
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at EOIV
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at LFU
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Ceftazidime and Avibactam
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Microbiological Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Microbiological Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Combined Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of 72 Hours Treatment: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at 72 Hours
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set at LFU
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Microbiological ITT (Micro-ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Day 7
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Combined Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cephalosporin Class Effects and Additional Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02497781 (29) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit
NCT02504827 (2) [back to overview]Peak Sputum Concentration
NCT02504827 (2) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT02822950 (5) [back to overview]Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Half Life Parameter in Intensive Care Patients
NCT02822950 (5) [back to overview]Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic (PK) Maximum Serum Concentration in Intensive Care Patients
NCT02822950 (5) [back to overview]Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Clearance of Drug Parameter in Intensive Care Patients
NCT02822950 (5) [back to overview]Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Area Under Serum Curve (mg*h/L) Parameter in Intensive Care Patients
NCT02822950 (5) [back to overview]Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic (PK) Volume of Distribution Parameter in Intensive Care Patients
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Concentration of Study Drug at Steady State After Continuous Infusion (Css)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, by System Organ Class (SOC) and Maximum Severity Level
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 2 (Moderate) or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Event
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)
NCT03978091 (40) [back to overview]Concentration of Study Drug at Steady State After Continuous Infusion (Css)
NCT04358991 (1) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Ceftazidime and Avibactam Among Critically-ill Patients
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Time for Cmax (Tmax) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Tmax of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Vss of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Vz of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Ae0-tau of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Ae0-tau% of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]AUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]AUC0-tau of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]CL of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]CLr of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Cmax of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Ctau of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Renal Clearance (CLr) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]t1/2 of AVI
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATM
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs Data
NCT04486625 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Time of Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ Following Multiple Dosing (Rac) on Day 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC6) on Day 1 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the End of the Dosing Interval (τ), Where τ=6 Hours (AUCtau) on Day 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the End of the Dosing Interval (τ), Where τ=6 Hours (AUCtau) on Day 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-State (AUC24,ss) on Day 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-State (AUC24,ss) on Day 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ Following Multiple Dosing (Rac) on Day 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Assessments
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC6) on Day 1 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac,Cmax) on Day 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Renal Clearance (CLr) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac,Cmax) on Day 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Time of Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam
NCT04973826 (34) [back to overview]Renal Clearance (CLr) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ1
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Microbiological Outcome at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ19
Imipenem Cilastatin25

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ24
Imipenem Cilastatin32

[back to top]

Clinical Outcome in CE Patients at the Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit

Cure: all or most pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection showed no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotic was required (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ20
Imipenem Cilastatin24

[back to top]

Clinical Outcome in CE Patients at the TOC Visit

Cure: all or most pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection had resolved and no additional antibiotic was required (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ24
Imipenem Cilastatin29

[back to top]

Clinical Outcome in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Patients at the End of Intravenous (IV) Therapy Visit

Cure: all or most pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection had resolved and no additional antibiotic was required (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ28
Imipenem Cilastatin36

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ1
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL remained <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ1
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen C. Koseri in ME Patients at the TOC Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ1
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Cloacae in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin1

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Cloacae in ME Patients at the TOC Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin1

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL remained <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ15
Imipenem Cilastatin17

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen E. Coli in ME Patients at the TOC Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ19
Imipenem Cilastatin23

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL remained <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Aeruginosa in ME Patients at the TOC Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin0

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin1

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL remained <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin1

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome for the Urine Pathogen P. Mirabilis in ME Patients at the TOC Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 5 to 9 days post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ0
Imipenem Cilastatin1

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the End of IV Therapy Visit

Eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (4 to 14 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ25
Imipenem Cilastatin34

[back to top]

Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at >10^5 CFU/mL remained <10^4 CFU/mL (NCT00690378)
Timeframe: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NXL104/CAZ15
Imipenem Cilastatin18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the End of Intravenous (IV) Therapy

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. This clinical response was measured in participants who were ME at baseline. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy: From Day 5 to Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole66
Meropenem74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the Late Follow-up Visit

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. This clinical response was measured in participants who were ME at baseline. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Late follow-up visit: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy (up to 8 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole62
Meropenem71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. This clinical response was measured in participants who were microbiologically evaluable (ME) at baseline. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Test of cure visit: 2 weeks post-therapy (Day 28)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole62
Meropenem71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response in CE Participants at the End of IV Therapy

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy: From Day 5 to Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole84
Meropenem87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response in CE Participants at the Late Follow-up Visit

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Late follow-up visit: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy (up to 8 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole79
Meropenem84

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Response in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Participants at the Test of Cure Visit

Clinical response was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection. No further antimicrobial therapy or surgical or radiological intervention was required. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Test of cure visit: 2 weeks post-therapy (Day 28)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole80
Meropenem85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the End of IV Therapy

Microbiological response was defined as eradication of pathogen identified (absence of causative pathogens from appropriately obtained specimens at site of infection) or presumptive eradication of pathogens (absence of material to culture in a participant who had responded clinically to treatment). This clinical response was measured in participants who were ME at baseline. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy: From Day 5 to Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole66
Meropenem74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure Visit

Microbiological response was defined as eradication of pathogen identified (absence of causative pathogens from appropriately obtained specimens at site of infection) or presumptive eradication of pathogens (absence of material to culture in a participant who had responded clinically to treatment). This clinical response was measured in participants who were ME at baseline. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Test of cure visit: 2 weeks post-therapy (Day 28)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole62
Meropenem71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 6 weeks after last dose of study treatment that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 6 weeks after last dose of study treatment (up to a maximum of 8 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Meropenem5911
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole659

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Late Follow-up Visit

Favorable: eradication (absence of causative pathogens from appropriately obtained specimens at site of infection) or presumptive eradication (absence of material to culture in a patient who had responded clinically to treatment) (NCT00752219)
Timeframe: Late follow-up visit: 4 to 6 weeks post-therapy (up to 8 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole62
Meropenem71

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=179, 194)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=30, 35)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=11,5)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=8, 13)
CAZ-AVI129231156
Doripenem12718188

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI198321669
Doripenem189306913

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=19, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI19210
Doripenem17101

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=19, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI19210
Doripenem17101

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI29311
Doripenem27202

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=4,4)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=18, 21)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=95, 111)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=68, 54)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=19, 18)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 5)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=2, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=5, 7)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=8, 9)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=3, 7)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=6, 11)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=6, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=9, 2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=4,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 1,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,3)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=4,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=5,6)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=1,0)
CAZ-AVI25178356132110000001147146200000019400000000000010100111000000000001411001
Doripenem4517944082000000000276283000001000400000000000001201400000000000002541100

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=4,4)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=18, 21)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=95, 111)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=68, 54)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=19, 18)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 5)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=2, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=5, 7)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=8, 9)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=3, 7)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=6, 11)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=5, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=9, 2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=4,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 1,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,3)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=4,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=3,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0)
CAZ-AVI25178356132110000001147145200000019400000000000010100111000000000001411000
Doripenem4517944082000000000276283000000000400000000000001201400000000000002430000

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=8, 7)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=28, 35)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=123, 139)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=90, 81)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=28, 25)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=3, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=9, 8)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=11, 10)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=4, 10)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=8, 16)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=8, 5)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=10, 5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=6,6)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 3,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 2,5)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=5,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=7,6)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=2,0)
CAZ-AVI3824103671841100000011791662000000110500000000000010200111000000000001531002
Doripenem5623111541320000000002873113000001003500100000000001211400000000000022541100

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1,1)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=122, 119)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=79, 89)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=10, 8)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1, 2)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC:0.03) - Favorable (n=15, 23)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=8, 12)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=3, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=4,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 3)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 2, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 3,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1,1)
CAZ-AVI110664711000000001127211100001001246100000001110020000000002022010001
Doripenem19570310000000001186210000100000121000000001114001000000003211201111

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1,1)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=122, 119)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=79, 89)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=10, 8)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1,0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC:0.03) - Favorable (n=15, 23)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=8, 12)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=3,2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=1,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=4,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 3)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 2, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 3,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0,0)
CAZ-AVI110664711000000001127211100000001246100000001110020000000002022010000
Doripenem19570310000000001186210000000000121000000001114001000000003211200000

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1, 3)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=160, 160)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=112, 123)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=14, 10)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=3, 3)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 3)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03)-Favorable (n=22, 27)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=11, 16)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=4,4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,3)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=6,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 4)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 3,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,5)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 3, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0, 4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 4,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=2,1)
CAZ-AVI11278910110000000011610211100001001256200000002110020000000002122011102
Doripenem311986420000000002217220000100000142200000001214001000000003221301111

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=214, 226)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=32, 42)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=14, 7)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=13, 18)
CAZ-AVI180261458
Doripenem176294813

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=214, 221)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=31, 41)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=14, 7)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=9, 13)
CAZ-AVI180251457
Doripenem17128489

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI2293316612
Doripenem220359915

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=22, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI22210
Doripenem20201

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=22, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI22210
Doripenem20201

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (CE at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI23519
Doripenem25433

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3351
Doripenem3692

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3241
Doripenem3592

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI374118
Doripenem395319

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI18467
Doripenem17399

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI18263
Doripenem16696

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2688342
Doripenem25412538

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI24349
Doripenem23675

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI24145
Doripenem22573

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC. The primary efficacy outcome variable for ROW is the proportion of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3045831
Doripenem2968338

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3714
Doripenem4122

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI6587.2

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI47199
Doripenem51276

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (CE at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the CE at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1231221
Doripenem1181135

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1241240
Doripenem1111083

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1241240
Doripenem1081053

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (mMITT Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the mMITT analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1571552
Doripenem1501437

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI1883.2

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: within 15 minutes before/after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI9307.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI47575.1

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI16959.6

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: within 15 minutes before/after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI65481.2

[back to top]

Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with both a favorable per patient microbiological response and symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of all UTI-specific symptoms (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain/flank pain) based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)). (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2808132
Doripenem26910939

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (CE at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI3464
Doripenem3874

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI32745
Doripenem36821

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI31843
Doripenem35821

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI378510
Doripenem40755

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI232154
Doripenem246242

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI226154
Doripenem236242

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3352335
Doripenem3503928

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (CE at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI2898
Doripenem30921

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI28345
Doripenem298130

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI27745
Doripenem285130

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3551127
Doripenem3772416

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=51, 63)Escherichia coli patients - Clin cure (n=23, 27)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=15, 23)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients-Clin cure(n=3,6)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=5,5)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=0, 2)
CAZ-AVI502215350
Doripenem612523652

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI31311
Doripenem28202

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=48, 57)Escherichia coli patients-Clin cure (n=23,27)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=14, 22)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients-Clin cure(n=1, 2)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=5,5)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=0, 2)
CAZ-AVI472214150
Doripenem552522252

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=75, 84)Escherichia coli patients - Clin cure (n=36, 37)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=18,30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients- Clin cure(n=7,6)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=7,6)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=2, 5)
CAZ-AVI673317552
Doripenem753128655

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set. (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3513
Doripenem3720

[back to top]

Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of UTI-specific symptoms except flank pain (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain) with resolution of or improvement in flank pain based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the Day 5 visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)). (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At Day 5 visit. Day 5 visit is based on 24 hour periods from the first dose date and time.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Symptomatic resolutionSymptom persistenceIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI27610314
Doripenem27612417

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=250, 274)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=34, 49)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=13, 11)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 9, 12)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 18)
CAZ-AVI2503413917
Doripenem27448111217

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=249, 270)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=33, 48)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=13,11)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 9, 12)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=10, 15)
CAZ-AVI249331399
Doripenem27047111214

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI2804116917
Doripenem29351111318

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=26, 24)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI26111
Doripenem24102

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=26, 24)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI26111
Doripenem24102

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI31211
Doripenem28202

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set (NCT01595438)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=179, 198)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=31, 36)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=11,5)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=12, 16)
CAZ-AVI129241157
Doripenem13119189

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI24349
Doripenem23675

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI24145
Doripenem22573

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC. The primary efficacy outcome variable for ROW is the proportion of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3045831
Doripenem2968338

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3714
Doripenem4122

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3513
Doripenem3720

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI47199
Doripenem51276

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (CE at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the CE at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1231221
Doripenem1181135

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1241240
Doripenem1111083

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1241240
Doripenem1081053

[back to top]

Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (mMITT Analysis Set)

Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the mMITT analysis set who have fever at study entry. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of patients with fever (>38°C) at baselineNumber afebrile at the time of the last obsNumber censored at the time of the last obs
CAZ-AVI1571552
Doripenem1501437

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: within 15 minutes before/after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI65481.2

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI6587.2

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI1883.2

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: within 15 minutes before/after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI9307.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI47575.1

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ-AVI16959.6

[back to top]

Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with both a favorable per patient microbiological response and symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of all UTI-specific symptoms (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain/flank pain) based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)). (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2808132
Doripenem26910939

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (CE at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI3464
Doripenem3874

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI32745
Doripenem36821

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI31843
Doripenem35821

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI378510
Doripenem40755

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (CE at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI23519
Doripenem25433

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI232154
Doripenem246242

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI226154
Doripenem236242

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3352335
Doripenem3503928

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (CE at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI2898
Doripenem30921

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI28345
Doripenem298130

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI27745
Doripenem285130

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI3551127
Doripenem3772416

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=51, 63)Escherichia coli patients - Clin cure (n=23, 27)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=15, 23)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients-Clin cure(n=3,6)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=5,5)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=0, 2)
CAZ-AVI502215350
Doripenem612523652

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=48, 57)Escherichia coli patients-Clin cure (n=23,27)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=14, 22)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients-Clin cure(n=1, 2)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=5,5)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=0, 2)
CAZ-AVI472214150
Doripenem552522252

[back to top]

Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
All patients - Clinical cure (n=75, 84)Escherichia coli patients - Clin cure (n=36, 37)Klebsiella pneumoniae patients-Clin cure(n=18,30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa patients- Clin cure(n=7,6)Enterobacter cloacae patients-Clin cure(n=7,6)Proteus mirabilis patients - Clin cure (n=2, 5)
CAZ-AVI673317552
Doripenem753128655

[back to top]

Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

Number of patients with symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of UTI-specific symptoms except flank pain (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain) with resolution of or improvement in flank pain based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the Day 5 visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)). (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At Day 5 visit. Day 5 visit is based on 24 hour periods from the first dose date and time.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Symptomatic resolutionSymptom persistenceIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI27610314
Doripenem27612417

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=250, 274)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=34, 49)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=13, 11)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 9, 12)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 18)
CAZ-AVI2503413917
Doripenem27448111217

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=249, 270)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=33, 48)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=13,11)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 9, 12)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=10, 15)
CAZ-AVI249331399
Doripenem27047111214

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI2804116917
Doripenem29351111318

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=26, 24)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI26111
Doripenem24102

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=26, 24)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI26111
Doripenem24102

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI31211
Doripenem28202

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=179, 198)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=31, 36)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=11,5)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=12, 16)
CAZ-AVI129241157
Doripenem13119189

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=179, 194)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=30, 35)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=11,5)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=8, 13)
CAZ-AVI129231156
Doripenem12718188

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI198321669
Doripenem189306913

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=19, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI19210
Doripenem17101

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=19, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 1)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI19210
Doripenem17101

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI29311
Doripenem27202

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=4,4)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=18, 21)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=95, 111)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=68, 54)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=19, 18)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 5)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=2, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=5, 7)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=8, 9)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=3, 7)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=6, 11)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=6, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=9, 2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=4,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 1,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,3)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=4,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=5,6)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=1,0)
CAZ-AVI25178356132110000001147146200000019400000000000010100111000000000001411001
Doripenem4517944082000000000276283000001000400000000000001201400000000000002541100

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=4,4)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=18, 21)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=95, 111)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=68, 54)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=19, 18)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 5)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=2, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=5, 7)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=8, 9)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=3, 7)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=6, 11)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=5, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=9, 2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=4,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 1,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,3)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=4,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=3,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0)
CAZ-AVI25178356132110000001147145200000019400000000000010100111000000000001411000
Doripenem4517944082000000000276283000000000400000000000001201400000000000002430000

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=8, 7)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=28, 35)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=123, 139)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=90, 81)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=28, 25)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=5, 6)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=3, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=9, 8)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=11, 10)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=4, 10)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=8, 16)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=8, 5)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 2, 4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=1,1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=10, 5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=6,6)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=0,1)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 0, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 3,2)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 2,5)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 1,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 2,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >32)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=5,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=7,6)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=2,0)
CAZ-AVI3824103671841100000011791662000000110500000000000010200111000000000001531002
Doripenem5623111541320000000002873113000001003500100000000001211400000000000022541100

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1,1)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=122, 119)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=79, 89)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=10, 8)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1, 2)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC:0.03) - Favorable (n=15, 23)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=8, 12)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=3, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=4,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 3)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 2, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 3,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=1,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1,1)
CAZ-AVI110664711000000001127211100001001246100000001110020000000002022010001
Doripenem19570310000000001186210000100000121000000001114001000000003211201111

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1,1)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=122, 119)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=79, 89)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=10, 8)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1,0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC:0.03) - Favorable (n=15, 23)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=8, 12)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=3,2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2, 2)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=1,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0,0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=4,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 3)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=1,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 1,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 2, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0,4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 3,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=1,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0,0)
CAZ-AVI110664711000000001127211100000001246100000001110020000000002022010000
Doripenem19570310000000001186210000000000121000000001114001000000003211200000

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=1, 3)E. coli (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=160, 160)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=112, 123)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=14, 10)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=3, 3)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=1, 0)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0,0)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)E. coli (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: <=0.008)-Favorable(n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=1, 3)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.03)-Favorable (n=22, 27)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=11, 16)Kleb.pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) -Favorable(n=4,4)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,3)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n= 0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 1)Kleb. pneumoniae (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC:<=0.008)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n=0,0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n=1, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n=6,5)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n=6, 4)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n=2,2)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Proteus mirabilis (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n=0, 0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: <=0.008)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.015)- Favorable (n= 3,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.03)- Favorable (n= 1,5)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.06)- Favorable (n= 3, 1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.12)- Favorable (n= 0, 4)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.25)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 0.5)- Favorable (n= 4,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 1)- Favorable (n= 0,1)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 2)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 4)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 8)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: 16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)Entero. cloacae (MIC: >16)- Favorable (n= 0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.015) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=2,3)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=2,5)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=1,4)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1,0)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=2,2)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=2,1)P.aeruginosa (MIC: >16) - Favorable (n=2,1)
CAZ-AVI11278910110000000011610211100001001256200000002110020000000002122011102
Doripenem311986420000000002217220000100000142200000001214001000000003221301111

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=214, 226)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=32, 42)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=14, 7)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=13, 18)
CAZ-AVI180261458
Doripenem176294813

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=214, 221)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=31, 41)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=14, 7)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 7, 11)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=9, 13)
CAZ-AVI180251457
Doripenem17128489

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=292, 306)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=44, 56)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=17, 13)Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable (n= 11,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=18, 20)
CAZ-AVI2293316612
Doripenem220359915

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=22, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI22210
Doripenem20201

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=22, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 1)
CAZ-AVI22210
Doripenem20201

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=32, 28)Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable (n=4, 2)Proteus mirabilis - Favorable (n=1, 0)Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 2)
CAZ-AVI31311
Doripenem28202

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3351
Doripenem3692

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI3241
Doripenem3592

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV) (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI374118
Doripenem395319

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI18467
Doripenem17399

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI18263
Doripenem16696

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)

Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU (NCT01599806)
Timeframe: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2688342
Doripenem25412538

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT in EME at EOT Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole90
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1270
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1331

[back to top]

Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) in Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole802
cUTI:Best Available Therapy12926
cUTI:CAZ-AVI132210

[back to top]

Clinical Response at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the FU2 visit in EME at FU2 analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
cUTI:Best Available Therapy10212
cUTI:CAZ-AVI10610

[back to top]

Clinical Response at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set.

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the FU1 visit in EME at FU1 analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization/cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole70
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1108
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1204

[back to top]

Clinical Response at Follow-up 2 (FU2) in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the FU2 visit in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
cUTI:Best Available Therapy118136
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1231110

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at TOC by Baseline Gram-negative Pathogen in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC visit by baseline pathogen (>=10% of frequency in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients) in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy.Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli - Clinical cure (n=6, 4, 57, 59)K. pneumoniae - Clinical cure (n=3, 5, 65, 55)P. aeruginosa - clinical cure (n=1, 1, 5, 14)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy221
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole331
cUTI:Best Available Therapy54615
cUTI:CAZ-AVI535412

[back to top]

Clinical Response at Follow-up 1 (FU1) in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the FU1 visit in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization/cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole802
cUTI:Best Available Therapy12188
cUTI:CAZ-AVI127512

[back to top]

Clinical Response at EOT in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (EME) at EOT Analysis Set.

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the EOT visit in the EME at EOT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole90
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1270
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1340

[back to top]

Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) in mMITT Analysis Set.

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the EOT visit in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole901
cUTI:Best Available Therapy13601
cUTI:CAZ-AVI14202

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at TOC by Previously Failed Treatment Class in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC visit by previously failed treatment class in the mMITT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
At least 1 failed - Clin. cure (n=4,7,12,7)Antibiotics - Clin. cure (n=0,1,0,0)Carbapenems - Clin. cure (n=1,0,1,2)Comb of Sulf/Trime inc Deriv-Clin. cure(n=0,0,2,0)Combs Of Peni. Inc B-Lact. Inhib.-Cure(n=1,3,0,2)Cortico,Po. Comb W/Antibio.-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)First-Gen. Cephalosporins-Clin. cure (n=0,0,2,0)Fluoroquinolones - Clin. cure (n=1,2,7,1)Glycopeptide Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=1,0,0,0)Imidazole Derivatives - Clin. cure (n=2,3,0,0)Other Aminoglycosides-Clin. cure (n=0,0,1,1)Other Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=0,1,1,0)Other Antibio. F. Topic. Use-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)Penici. With Ext. Spectrum-Clin. cure(n=0,1,0,0)Third-Gen.Cephalosporins -Clin. cure(n=2,4,3,2)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy300010000100002
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole710030020301014
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1201201270011103
cUTI:CAZ-AVI601020010010002

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam - cIAI in PK Analysis Set

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime and avibactam plasma concentration. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: Anytime within 15 minutes prior to or after stopping study drug, anytime between 30 to 90 minutes after stopping study drug, anytime between 300 to 360 minutes after stopping study drug

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ (1)23880.3
AVI (1)3061.3
CAZ (2)39465.3
AVI (2)6304.1
CAZ (3)14904.8
AVI (3)1769.3

[back to top]

The 28 Days All Cause Mortality Rate in EME at TOC Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with Day 28 all-cause mortality in EME at TOC analysis set. The death in the cIAI patient were reviewed independently by the SRP Chair. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: From first infusion to Day 28

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
All cause mortalityDeaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE withoutcome=death
cIAI:Best Available Therapy000
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole000
cUTI:Best Available Therapy101
cUTI:CAZ-AVI101

[back to top]

The Reason for Treatment Change/Discontinuation in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients in the mMITT analysis set for whom the assigned study treatment was changed, discontinued, or interrupted. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: From first infusion to last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Treatment ChangeTreatment Change - Crcl changeTreatment Change - OtherTreatment discontinuationTreatment discontinuation - AETreatment discontinuation - OtherTreatment interruptedTreatment interrupted - Change of infusion site
cIAI:Best Available Therapy11041300
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole00000000
cUTI:Best Available Therapy85331200
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1110111011

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in mMITT Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole802
cUTI:Best Available Therapy88427
cUTI:CAZ-AVI118179

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy.Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole80
cUTI:Best Available Therapy8440
cUTI:CAZ-AVI11417

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU2 in mMITT Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
cUTI:Best Available Therapy735410
cUTI:CAZ-AVI993510

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
cUTI:Best Available Therapy6847
cUTI:CAZ-AVI8532

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU1 in mMITT Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization/cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole802
cUTI:Best Available Therapy78509
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1032912

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization/cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole70
cUTI:Best Available Therapy7545
cUTI:CAZ-AVI9828

[back to top]

Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT in mMITT Analysis Set

"Microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cIAI patients where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to a Surgical Review Panel assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
cIAI:Best Available Therapy605
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole901
cUTI:Best Available Therapy13016
cUTI:CAZ-AVI13617

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at TOC by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at TOC Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC visit by previously failed treatment class in EME at TOC analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Antibiotics - Clin. cure (n=0,1,0,0)Carbapenems - Clin. cure (n=0,0,1,1)Comb of Sulf/Trime inc Deriv-Clin. cure(n=0,0,2,0)Combs Of Peni. Inc B-Lact. Inhib.-Cure(n=1,3,0,2)Cortico,Po. Comb W/Antibio.-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)First-Gen. Cephalosporins-Clin. cure (n=0,0,2,0)Fluoroquinolones - Clin. cure (n=0,2,5,1)Imidazole Derivatives - Clin. cure (n=1,3,0,0)Other Aminoglycosides-Clin. cure (n=0,0,0,1)Other Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=0,1,1,0)Other Antibio. F. Topic. Use-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)Penici. With Ext. Spectrum-Clin. cure(n=0,1,0,0)Third-Gen.Cephalosporins -Clin. cure(n=2,4,2,2)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy0001000100002
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole1003002301014
cUTI:Best Available Therapy0120125001102
cUTI:CAZ-AVI0102001010002

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequency in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Indeterminate (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Indeterminate (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Indeterminate (n=1, 1, 5, 14)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy204201100
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole301302100
cUTI:Best Available Therapy3816343193320
cUTI:CAZ-AVI523446811121

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=2, 3, 49, 53)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=2, 3, 49, 53)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 3, 60, 53)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=2, 3, 60, 53)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 13)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 13)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy202010
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole303010
cUTI:Best Available Therapy3415421832
cUTI:CAZ-AVI503458112

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). For E.coli, MIC available values are: <=0.008, 0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 8. For K. pneumoniae, MIC available values are: 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 32, >32. For P. aeruginosa, MIC available values are: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, >32. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 1)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 0, 2)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=1, 0, 3, 2)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=4, 2, 20, 20)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 15, 16)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0, 1, 8, 11)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 2)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 1)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 4)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0,2,0)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,1,8,5)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,3,12,6)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=2,0,24,22)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0,0,16,18)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 1, 1, 2)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 1)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 0)K. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0,0,1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0, 0, 1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 3, 2)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 0, 2)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 1, 0, 1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 3)P. aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0,1,5)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy000200000000101000100000
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole000101000002001000000100
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1031210512216716111100010011
cUTI:CAZ-AVI11216151021404519161000112034

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC in EME at TOC Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). For E.coli, MIC available values are: <=0.008, 0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 8. For K. pneumoniae, MIC available values are: 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, >32. For P. aeruginosa, MIC available values are: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, >32. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli (MIC: <=0.008) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 1)E. coli (MIC: 0.03) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 0, 2)E. coli (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 3, 1)E. coli (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=2, 1, 18, 18)E. coli (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 13, 15)E. coli (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=0, 1, 6, 9)E. coli (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 2)E. coli (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 1)E. coli (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 2, 4)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.06) - Favorable (n=0,0,1,0)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.12) - Favorable (n=0,0,8,5)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.25) - Favorable (n=0,2,11,6)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 0.5) - Favorable (n=1,0,23,21)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 1) - Favorable (n=0,0,15,17)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 1, 1, 2)K. pneumoniae (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 1)K. pneumoniae (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0,0,1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 2) - Favorable (n=1, 0, 0, 1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 4) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 3, 2)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 8) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 0, 2)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 16) - Favorable (n=0, 1, 0, 1)P. aeruginosa (MIC: 32) - Favorable (n=0, 0, 1, 3)P. aeruginosa (MIC: >32) - Favorable (n=0,0,1,4)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy00020000000010100100000
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole00010100000200100000100
cUTI:Best Available Therapy10310941220671611110010011
cUTI:CAZ-AVI111161592140451915200112034

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU2 in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=0, 0, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=0, 0, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Indeterminate (n=0, 0, 57, 59)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=0, 0, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=0, 0, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Indeterminate (n=0, 0, 65, 55)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=0, 0, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=0, 0, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Indeterminate (n=0, 0, 5, 14)
cUTI:Best Available Therapy3219635264230
cUTI:CAZ-AVI43142391421022

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU2 in EME at FU2 Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=44, 50)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=44, 50)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n= 56, 46)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=56, 46)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=4, 11)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=4, 11)
cUTI:Best Available Therapy2816332322
cUTI:CAZ-AVI3911321492

[back to top]

The 28 Days All Cause Mortality Rate in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with Day 28 all-cause mortality in mMITT analysis set. The death in the cIAI patient were reviewed independently by the SRP Chair. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: From first infusion to Day 28

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
All cause mortalityDeaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=death
cIAI:Best Available Therapy101
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole000
cUTI:Best Available Therapy303
cUTI:CAZ-AVI303

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU1 in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequency in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization/cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Indeterminate (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Indeterminate (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Indeterminate (n=1, 1, 5, 14)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy204201100
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole301302100
cUTI:Best Available Therapy3318639233320
cUTI:CAZ-AVI4512242103824

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at FU1 in EME at FU1 Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization/cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=2, 3, 46, 54)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=2, 3, 46, 54)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 2, 59, 50)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=2, 2, 59, 50)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 10)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 10)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy202010
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole302010
cUTI:Best Available Therapy3016382132
cUTI:CAZ-AVI4311401082

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at EOT in mMITT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequency in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Escherichia coli - Indeterminate (n=6, 4, 57, 59)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Indeterminate (n=3, 5, 65, 55)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Indeterminate (n=1, 1, 5, 14)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy204201100
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole301401100
cUTI:Best Available Therapy53046113500
cUTI:CAZ-AVI570252031400

[back to top]

Per-pathogen Microbiological Response of Gram-negative Pathogen at EOT in EME at EOT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response for pathogens (>=10% of frequncy in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients): favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence (or urine quantification less than 10^4 CFU/ml for cUTI patients) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. If the patient was bacteremic at Screening, the bacteremia has also resolved. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI population). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy. Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Escherichia coli - Favorable (n=2, 3, 51, 55)Escherichia coli - Unfavorable (n=2, 3, 51, 55)Kleb. pneumoniae - Favorable (n=2, 4, 60, 52)Kleb. pneumoniae - Unfavorable (n=2, 4, 60, 52)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Favorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)Pseudo. aeruginosa - Unfavorable (n=1, 1, 5, 14)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy202010
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole304010
cUTI:Best Available Therapy51060050
cUTI:CAZ-AVI550520140

[back to top]

Clinical Response at TOC in EME at TOC Analysis Set.

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at the TOC visit in the EME at TOC analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy.Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
cIAI:Best Available Therapy50
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole80
cUTI:Best Available Therapy1202
cUTI:CAZ-AVI1262

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at TOC by Baseline Gram-negative Pathogen in EME at TOC Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC visit by baseline Gram-negative pathogen (>=10% of frequency in the combined cIAI and cUTI patients) in EME at TOC analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 6-12 days after last infusion of study therapy.Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
E. coli - Clinical cure (n=2, 3, 48, 52)K. pneumoniae - Clinical cure (n=2, 3, 59, 53)P. aeruginosa - Clinical cure (n=1, 1, 5, 12)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy221
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole331
cUTI:Best Available Therapy47595
cUTI:CAZ-AVI515312

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at FU2 by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at FU2 Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at FU2 visit by previously failed treatment class in EME at FU2 analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: At FU2, data was only collected for the cUTI Arms: 28-34 calendar days from randomization

,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Carbapenems - Clin. cure (n=1,0)Comb of Sulf/Trime inc Deriv-Clin. cure(n=1,0)Combs Of Peni. Inc B-Lact. Inhib.-Cure(n=0,2)Cortico,Po. Comb W/Antibio.-Clin. cure(n=1,0)First-Gen. Cephalosporins-Clin. cure (n=2,0)Fluoroquinolones - Clin. cure (n=5,0)Other Aminoglycosides-Clin. cure (n=0,1)Other Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=1,0)Other Antibio. F. Topic. Use-Clin. cure(n=1,0)Third-Gen.Cephalosporins -Clin. cure(n=1,1)
cUTI:Best Available Therapy0000240010
cUTI:CAZ-AVI0020001001

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at FU1 by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at FU1 Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at FU1 visit by previously failed treatment class in EME at FU1 analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: cIAI: 27-37 calendar days from randomization/cUTI: 20-27 calendar days from randomization

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Antibiotics - Clin. cure (n=0,1,0,0)Carbapenems - Clin. cure (n=0,0,1,1)Comb of Sulf/Trime inc Deriv-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)Combs Of Peni. Inc B-Lact. Inhib.-Cure(n=1,3,0,2)Cortico,Po. Comb W/Antibio.-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)First-Gen. Cephalosporins-Clin. cure (n=0,0,2,0)Fluoroquinolones - Clin. cure (n=0,2,5,1)Imidazole Derivatives - Clin. cure (n=1,3,0,0)Other Aminoglycosides-Clin. cure (n=0,0,0,1)Other Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=0,1,1,0)Other Antibio. F. Topic. Use-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)Penici. With Ext. Spectrum-Clin. cure(n=0,1,0,0)Third-Gen.Cephalosporins -Clin. cure(n=2,4,1,2)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy0001000100002
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole1003002301014
cUTI:Best Available Therapy0110024001100
cUTI:CAZ-AVI0102001010002

[back to top]

Clinical Cure at EOT by Previously Failed Treatment Class in EME at EOT Analysis Set

Proportion of patients with clinical cure at EOT visit by previously failed treatment class in EME at EOT analysis set. Clinical cure: Complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy (other than those allowed per protocol) is necessary; for cIAI patients no drainage or surgical intervention after 96 hours from randomization is necessary (ie. drainage or surgical intervention up to 96 hours from randomization is permissible). (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: 28 hours after completion of last infusion of study therapy.Duration of study therapy was 5 to 21 days.

,,,
InterventionParticipant (Number)
Antibiotics - Clin. cure (n=0,1,0,0)Carbapenems - Clin. cure (n=0,0,1,1)Comb of Sulf/Trime inc Deriv-Clin. cure(n=0,0,2,0)Combs Of Peni. Inc B-Lact. Inhib.-Cure(n=1,3,0,2)Cortico,Po. Comb W/Antibio.-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)First-Gen. Cephalosporins-Clin. cure (n=0,0,2,0)Fluoroquinolones - Clin. cure (n=0,2,5,1)Imidazole Derivatives - Clin. cure (n=1,3,0,0)Other Aminoglycosides-Clin. cure (n=0,0,1,1)Other Antibacterials-Clin. cure (n=0,1,1,0)Other Antibio. F. Topic. Use-Clin. cure(n=0,0,1,0)Penici. With Ext. Spectrum-Clin. cure(n=0,1,0,0)Third-Gen.Cephalosporins -Clin. cure(n=2,4,2,2)
cIAI:Best Available Therapy0001000100002
cIAI:CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole1003002301014
cUTI:Best Available Therapy0120125011102
cUTI:CAZ-AVI0102001010002

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam - cUTI in PK Analysis Set

Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime and avibactam plasma concentration. (NCT01644643)
Timeframe: Anytime within 15 minutes prior to or after stopping study drug, anytime between 30 to 90 minutes after stopping study drug, anytime between 300 to 360 minutes after stopping study drug

InterventionNG/ML (Geometric Mean)
CAZ (1)74260.2
AVI (1)10103.8
CAZ (2)56905.9
AVI (2)8141.2
CAZ (3)21442.0
AVI (3)2425.0

[back to top]

Safety Profile - Number of Subjects With at Least 1 AE

from screening visit (Day -28) to 3 to 7 days post treatment period 3 (up to Day 22) in Part A, 3 to 7 days after receiving the final dose on Day 11 (days 14 to 18) in Part B, and 3 to 7 days after receiving the final dose on Day 10 (days 13 to 17) in Part C. (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: Informed consent (up to 28 days before first dose) to follow up period (max of 22 days after first dose for Part A, a max of 28 days after first dose in Part B, max 17 days in Part C)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of subjects with at least 1 AESubjects with at least 1 AE with outcome of deathAt least 1 AE leading to discontinuation
Part A: ATM 2000mg + AVI 600mg000
Part A: Avibactam (AVI) 600mg201
Part A: Aztreonam (ATM) 2000mg000
Part A: Drug201
Part A: Placebo100
Part B: Cohort 1 Drug400
Part B: Cohort 2 Drug202
Part B: Cohort 3 Drug601
Part B: Cohort 4 Drug800
Part B: Cohort 5 Drug300
Part B: Placebo300
Part C: Cohort 1 Drug500
Part C: Cohort 2 Drug700
Part C: Placebo301

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUC (ug*h/mL) for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC µg*h/mL) or AUC(0-last) in Part A on Day 1 after single infusion, area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady state after multiple infusion (AUCss µg*h/mL). (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in Part A. 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4 and 11 in Part B (varied intervals per cohort). 0 to 6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 4, 7 and 10 in Part C. Steady state measure on Day 11 in Part B or Day 10 in Part C

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionug*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC (ug*h/mL) - Aztreonam (ATM) aloneAUC (ug*h/mL) - Avibactam (AVI)aloneAUC (ug*h/mL) - ATM in combination (Day 1)AUCss (ug*h/mL) - ATM in combinationAUC (ug*h/mL) - AVI in combination (Day 1)AUCss (ug*h/mL) - AVI in combination
Part A: Drug37252.6375NA58.3NA
Part A: PlaceboNANANANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANA34527531.826.1
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANA326NA47.8NA
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANA28323153.143.3
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANA27022335.729.0
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANA25020331.426.7
Part B: PlaceboNANANANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANA27621141.929.3
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANA30825952.338.8
Part C: PlaceboNANANANANANA

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Cmax for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C

Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax µg/mL) on Day 1 after single infusion , maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Css,max µg/mL) after multiple infusion. (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in Part A. 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4 and 11 in Part B (varied intervals per cohort). 0 to 6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 4, 7 and 10 in Part C. Steady state measure on Day 11 in Part B or Day 10 in Part C

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax (ug/mL) - ATM aloneCmax (ug/mL) - AVI aloneCmax (ug/mL) - ATM in combination (Day1)Css, max (ug/mL) - ATM in combinationCmax (ug/mL) - AVI in combination (Day1)Css, max (ug/mL) - AVI in combination
Part A: Drug14326.8137NA137NA
Part A: PlaceboNANANANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANA12312416.014.5
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANA123NA25.1NA
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANA82.480.919.317.6
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANA63.262.69.998.69
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANA59.255.78.688.36
Part B: PlaceboNANANANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANA75.657.212.18.88
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANA81.666.215.211.6
Part C: PlaceboNANANANANANA

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter t1/2(h) for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C

Terminal half-life (t1/2), on Day 1 after single infusion and at steady state after multiple infusion. (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in Part A. 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4 and 11 in Part B (varied intervals per cohort). 0 to 6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 4, 7 and 10 in Part C. Steady state measure on Day 11 in Part B or Day 10 in Part C

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
t1/2 (h) - Aztreonam (ATM) alonet1/2 (h) - Avibactam (AVI)alonet1/2 (h) - ATM in combinationt1/2 (h) - AVI in combination
Part A: Drug1.982.222.092.35
Part A: PlaceboNANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANA2.242.17
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANA1.982.82
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANA1.902.61
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANA2.142.26
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANA2.281.85
Part B: PlaceboNANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANANANA
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANANANA
Part C: PlaceboNANANANA

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Tmax for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) on Day 1 in Parts A, B and C

Time to Cmax (tmax) (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,,,,,,,,
Intervention(h) (Median)
tmax (h) - ATM alonetmax (h) - AVI alonetmax (h) - ATM in combination (Day 1)tmax (h) - AVI in combination (Day 1)
Part A: Drug0.980.980.980.98
Part A: PlaceboNANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANA0.980.98
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANA0.980.98
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANA1.981.98
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANA2.982.98
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANA2.982.50
Part B: PlaceboNANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANA2.982.98
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANA2.982.98
Part C: PlaceboNANANANA

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameter Vss for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C

Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss). (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in Part A. 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4 and 11 in Part B (varied intervals per cohort). 0 to 6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 4, 7 and 10 in Part C. Steady state measure on Day 11 in Part B or Day 10 in Part C

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Vss (L) - ATM aloneVss (L) - AVI aloneVss (L) - ATM in cominationVss (L) - AVI in comination
Part A: Drug13.420.113.819.0
Part A: PlaceboNANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANA15.422.8
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANA15.122.2
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANA12.520.0
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANA13.723.5
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANA15.625.2
Part B: PlaceboNANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANANANA
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANANANA
Part C: PlaceboNANANANA

[back to top]

PK- Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameters CL and CLr for Aztreonam (ATM) and Avibactam (AVI) Alone and in Combination (ATM-AVI) in Parts A, B and C

Systemic clearence (CL) and renal clearance (CLr) on Day 1 after single infusion and at steady state after multiple infusion. (NCT01689207)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in Part A. 0 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1, 2, 4 and 11 in Part B (varied intervals per cohort). 0 to 6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 4, 7 and 10 in Part C. Steady state measure on Day 11 in Part B or Day 10 in Part C

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
CL (L/h) - ATM aloneCL(L/h) - AVI aloneCLr (L/h) - ATM aloneCLr (L/h) - AVI aloneCL(L/h) - ATM in combination (Day 1)CLr (L/h) - ATM in comination (Day 1)CL(L/h) - AVI in combination (Day 1)CLr (L/h) - AVI in comination (Day 1)CL(L/h) - ATM in combination (Steady state)CLr (L/h) - ATM in comination (Steady state)CL(L/h) - AVI in combination (Steady state)CLr (L/h) - AVI in comination (Steady state)
Part A: Drug5.3711.43.939.775.333.7810.38.71NANANANA
Part A: PlaceboNANANANANANANANANANANANA
Part B: Cohort 1 DrugNANANANA5.794.0411.810.67.274.6614.312.4
Part B: Cohort 2 DrugNANANANA6.154.1012.510.9NANANANA
Part B: Cohort 3 DrugNANANANA5.294.1811.311.16.494.9313.813.9
Part B: Cohort 4 DrugNANANANA5.564.0912.611.96.725.0715.514.7
Part B: Cohort 5 DrugNANANANA5.994.4313.112.57.395.2515.414.5
Part B: PlaceboNANANANANANANANANANANANA
Part C: Cohort 1 DrugNANANANANA4.22NA10.87.104.9714.013.0
Part C: Cohort 2 DrugNANANANANA3.41NA7.785.793.9910.69.49
Part C: PlaceboNANANANANANANANANANANANA

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=70, 80)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 18)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6952114
Meropenem7852916

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability:ECG , QTcB and QTcF Intervals

Shifts in ECG interpretation and changes in QT, QTcB, and QTcF intervals , from baseline to post baseline. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: EOT visit/any observation on treatment

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Normal to Abnormal: EOTNormal to Abnormal: Anytime up to EOTReaching a value in QT: ≥450 (ms)Reaching a value in QT: ≥480 (ms)Reaching a value in QT: ≥500 (ms)QT: ≥500 and increase from Baseline ≥60(ms)Increase in QT: ≥30 (ms)Increase in QT: ≥60 (ms)Decrease in QT: ≥30 (ms)Decrease in QT: ≥60 (ms)Reaching a value in QTcB: ≥450(ms)Reaching a value in QTcB: ≥480(ms)Reaching a value in QTcB: ≥500 (ms)QTcB: ≥500 and increase from Baseline ≥60(ms)Increase in QTcB: ≥30 (ms)Increase in QTcB: ≥60 (ms)Decrease in QTcB: ≥30 (ms)Decrease in QTcB: ≥60 (ms)Reaching a value in QTcF: ≥450 (ms)Reaching a value in QTcF: ≥480 (ms)Reaching a value in QTcF: ≥500 (ms)QTcF: ≥500 and increase from Baseline ≥60 (ms)Increase in QTcF: ≥30 (ms)Increase in QTcF: ≥60 (ms)Decrease QTcF: ≥30 (ms)Decrease QTcF: ≥60 (ms)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1734920011550241257134221242619410424217
Meropenem143010100114442446382127126418000413191

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability: Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Hematology.

Potentially clinically significant (PCS) post Baseline hematology values up to LFU (Safety analysis set) (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: study duration (from screening to Day 49 LFU visit)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Platelet count: PCS (Low)Platelet count: PCS (High)Red blood cell count: PCS (Low)Red blood cell count: PCS (High)White blood cell: PCS (Low)White blood cell: PCS (High)Hemoglobin: PCS (Low)Hemoglobin: PCS (High)Lymphocytes: PCS (Low)Lymphocytes: PCS (High)Neutrophils: PCS (Low)Neutrophils: PCS (High)Eosinophils: PCS (High)Monocytes: PCS (High)Basophils: PCS (High)Direct Coombs test:- at Baseline, + post-BaselineHematocrit (ratio): PCS (Low)Hematocrit (ratio): PCS (High)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1570147010490001550
Meropenem14130151401128000280

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability: Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Clinical Chemistry.

Potentially clinically significant (PCS) post Baseline clinical chemistry values up to LFU (Safety analysis set) (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: study duration (from screening to Day 49 LFU visit)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase (μkat/L): PCS (High)Alkaline phosphatase (μkat/L): PCS (Low)Alkaline phosphatase (μkat/L): PCS (High)Aspartate aminotransferase (μkat/L): PCS (High)Bicarbonate (mmol/L) PCS (Low)Bicarbonate (mmol/L): PCS (High)Creatinine (μmol/L): PCS (High)Glucose (non-fasting) (mmol/L): PCS (Low)Glucose (non-fasting) (mmol/L): PCS (High)Gamma-glutamyl transferase (μkat/L):PCS (High)Inorganic phosphorus (mmol/L): PCS (Low)Inorganic phosphorus (mmol/L): PCS (High)Potassium (mmol/L): PCS (Low)Potassium (mmol/L): PCS (High)Total bilirubin (μmol/L): PCS (High)Direct bilirubin (μmol/L): PCS (High)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole3024100012309301
Meropenem8034001014705111

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability by Incidence: Extent of Exposure.

Duration of exposure is calculated as the difference between the last study therapy date and the first study therapy date converted to days plus 1 day. Actual calculated duration could be shorter or longer than a full day. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: study duration (from screening to Day 49 LFU visit)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
1 - 2 days3 - 4 days5 -10 days11 - 14 days>14 days
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole106175240
Meropenem55181260

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1033
Meropenem1135

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At late follow up (LFU) visits (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole15711
Meropenem16811

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole907
Meropenem1066

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1161017
Meropenem132911

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole897
Meropenem1006

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure visit (Day 28 to35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole16611
Meropenem17311

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole937
Meropenem1136

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1191014
Meropenem13598

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole927
Meropenem1076

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability by Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events and Mortality.

Adverse event data were collected from the screening/consent visit until the late follow-up visit (i.e. Day -1/0 to Day 42). (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: study duration (from screening to Day 49 LFU visit)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Any AEAny SAEAny AE leading to discontinuation of IPAny AE of severe intensityTotal number of deathsDeaths due to disease progressionAny AE with outcome=death
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole82975220
Meropenem831135101

[back to top]

The Time to First Defervescence in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set for Patients Who Have Fever at Study Entry.

Time to first defervescence was calculated for patients with a fever (>38ºC) at baseline. Defervescence (≤37.8ºC) was defined as the absence of fever based on the highest temperature recorded on each study day. Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in the CE analysis set at TOC for patients who had fever at study entry is defined as time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: while on study therapy (from Day 1 to Day 14)

InterventionDays (Median)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1
Meropenem2

[back to top]

The Time to First Defervescence in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set for Patients Who Have Fever at Study Entry.

Time to first defervescence was calculated for patients with a fever (>38ºC) at baseline. Defervescence (≤37.8ºC) was defined as the absence of fever based on the highest temperature recorded on each study day. Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in the CE analysis set at TOC for patients who had fever at study entry is defined as time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: while on study therapy (from Day 1 to Day 14)

InterventionDays (Median)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1
Meropenem1.5

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime and Avibactam

Blood samples were taken from all patients on Day 3 for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of ceftazidime and avibactam plasma concentrations (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At Day 3: Anytime within 15 minutes prior to or after stopping study drug, anytime between 30 and 90 minutes after stopping study drug, anytime between 300 minutes and 360 minutes after stopping study drug.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Ceftazidime(1)60300.4
Avibactam(1)10126.9
Ceftazidime(2)46473.9
Avibactam(2)7289.3
Ceftazidime(3)9555.0
Avibactam(3)1207.2

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=69, 77)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 29)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 16)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6852114
Meropenem7552814

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=84, 89)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=28,35)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=17, 20)Streptococcus anginosus grou (n=8, 7)Streptococcus mitis group (n=6, 5)Enterococcus faecalis (n=6, 6)Enterococcus faecium (n=4, 7)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole77522157654
Meropenem86532176555

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole126611
Meropenem14075

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1043
Meropenem1205

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1837
Meropenem1879

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole927
Meropenem1076

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1191014
Meropenem13598

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole897
Meropenem1006

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1161017
Meropenem132911

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole907
Meropenem1066

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1033
Meropenem1135

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole126611
Meropenem14075

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (EOT) (within 24 hours after last IV dose)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole1043
Meropenem1205

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"The microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cases where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to an SRP assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole221
Meropenem231

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

"The microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cases where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to an SRP assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole2414
Meropenem2711

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole937
Meropenem1136

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With a Favorable Per Patient Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit for Patients Infected With Ceftazidime Resistant Pathogens in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

"The microbiological responses as per the protocoled criteria: responses other than indeterminate were classified as favorable or unfavorable. Favorable microbiological response assessments included eradication and presumed eradication. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments included persistence, persistence with increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and presumed persistence. Indeterminate microbiologic response assessments included cases where the clinical response was changed to indeterminate due to an SRP assessment of inadequate source control (ie, circumstances that preclude classification as eradication, presumed eradication, persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence)." (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole221
Meropenem251

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response in the Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=84, 89)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=28,35)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=17, 20)Streptococcus anginosus group (n=8, 7)Streptococcus mitis group (n=6, 5)Enterococcus faecalis (n=6, 6)Enterococcus faecium (n=4, 7)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole70523147664
Meropenem84531175545

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response in the Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=84, 89)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=28, 35)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=17, 20)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Enterococcus faecalis (n=6, 6)Enterococcus faecium (n=4, 7)Streptococcus anginosus group (n=8, 7)Streptococcus mitis group (n=6, 5)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole70221444376
Meropenem82311754555

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=69, 77)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 29)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 16)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6452113
Meropenem7452814

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable(ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the test of cure (TOC) (Day 28 to 35)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=70, 80)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 18)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6552113
Meropenem7752916

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=69, 77)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 29)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 16)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6342113
Meropenem7252714

[back to top]

The Proportion of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at the Late Follow up (LFU) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set.

The proportion of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favourable microbiological response includes: Eradication Absence of causative pathogen from specimens at the site of infection. Presumed eradication where, repeat cultures were not performed/clinically indicated in a patient who had a clinical response of cure. (NCT01726023)
Timeframe: At the late follow up (LFU) (Day 42 to 49)

,
InterventionParticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Escherichia coli (n=70, 80)Klebsiella oxytoca (n=5, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=22, 30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14, 18)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole6442113
Meropenem7552816

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses)

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2457932
Meropenem2707030

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI9629
Meropenem10328

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI8522
Meropenem9424

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI1203714
Meropenem1383412

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=45, 54)Enterobacteriaceae (n=34, 41)Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 6)Escherichia coli (n=6, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=20, 30)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=11,16)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=11, 15)
CAZ-AVI40323652088
Meropenem4533243261413

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=32, 40)Enterobacteriaceae (n=28, 35)Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 5)Escherichia coli (n=5, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=16, 26)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=4,7)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=4, 6)
CAZ-AVI31273651644
Meropenem36312332576

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=36, 41)Enterobacteriaceae (n=27, 30)Enterobacter cloacae (n=5, 5)Escherichia coli (n=5, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14, 22)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=9,13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=9, 13)
CAZ-AVI2923541266
Meropenem322233171212

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=45, 54)Enterobacteriaceae (n=34, 41)Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 6)Escherichia coli (n=6, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=20, 30)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=11,16)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=11, 15)
CAZ-AVI35283641677
Meropenem4029243221313

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=29, 32)Enterobacteriaceae (n=26, 28)Enterobacter cloacae (n=5, 5)Escherichia coli (n=4, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14, 20)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=3,6)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=3, 6)
CAZ-AVI2523541222
Meropenem2622331766

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at test-of-cure visit. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI29101931611
Meropenem256193414

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at test-of-cure visit. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI166101532
Meropenem14591700

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI11562451
Meropenem8442620

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at day 28. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: at Day 28 from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI30102031511
Meropenem276213394

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at day 28. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: at Day 28 from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI176111522
Meropenem165111680

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set at Day 28

The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set at day 28. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: at Day 28 from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who died (all cause mortality)Deaths due to disease progressionNumber of patients with any AE with outcome=deathNumber of patients aliveNumber of patients with unknown survival status
CAZ-AVI12572441
Meropenem9452610

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All (n=39, 49)Enterobacteriaceae (n=29, 37)Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 5)Escherichia coli (n=6, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=16, 28)Gram- pathogens not Enterobacteriaceae (n=10,14)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10, 13)
CAZ-AVI35273651688
Meropenem4231233251312

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI319
Meropenem3613

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI267
Meropenem2911

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI35101
Meropenem39132

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI2314
Meropenem2120

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI219
Meropenem1814

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI27163
Meropenem27234

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=6, 7)Enterobacter cloacae (n=22, 17)Escherichia coli (n=14, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=46, 57)Proteus mirabilis (n=9, 8)Serratia marcescens (n=13, 10)Haemophilus influenzae (n=14, 16)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=50, 41)Staphylococcus aureus (n=18, 26)
CAZ-AVI4221339812143016
Meropenem517175368162425

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=6, 7)Enterobacter cloacae (n=22, 17)Escherichia coli (n=13, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=45, 55)Proteus mirabilis (n=9, 8)Serratia marcescens (n=13, 10)Haemophilus influenzae (n=12, 15)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=38, 34)Staphylococcus aureus (n=16, 23)
CAZ-AVI4221338812122214
Meropenem517175168151922

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=8, 8)Enterobacter cloacae (n=26, 22)Escherichia coli (n=17, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=59, 71)Proteus mirabilis (n=14, 12)Serratia marcescens (n=15, 13)Haemophilus influenzae (n=16, 25)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=58, 47)Staphylococcus aureus (n=24, 34)
CAZ-AVI62515491212153321
Meropenem52018651011252732

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=6, 5)Enterobacter cloacae (n=21, 11)Escherichia coli (n=11, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=37, 49)Proteus mirabilis (n=11, 8)Serratia marcescens (n=12, 8)Haemophilus influenzae (n=11, 13)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=42, 35)Staphylococcus aureus (n=14, 22)
CAZ-AVI51810299911185
Meropenem37163965121417

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=6, 5)Enterobacter cloacae (n=21, 11)Escherichia coli (n=10, 18)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=37, 47)Proteus mirabilis (n=11, 8)Serratia marcescens (n=12, 8)Haemophilus influenzae (n=9, 12)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=31, 28)Staphylococcus aureus (n=13, 19)
CAZ-AVI5181029999134
Meropenem37163865111215

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=8, 8)Enterobacter cloacae (n=26, 22)Escherichia coli (n=17, 20)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=59, 71)Proteus mirabilis (n=14, 12)Serratia marcescens (n=15, 13)Haemophilus influenzae (n=16, 25)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=58, 47)Staphylococcus aureus (n=24, 34)
CAZ-AVI52113371110142211
Meropenem513165388231825

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 5)Escherichia coli (n=6, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=16, 28)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10, 13)
CAZ-AVI365148
Meropenem254256

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 5)Escherichia coli (n=5, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=16, 26)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=4, 6)
CAZ-AVI365143
Meropenem254231

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 6)Escherichia coli (n=6, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=20, 30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=11, 15)
CAZ-AVI365188
Meropenem264267

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter cloacae (n=5, 5)Escherichia coli (n=5, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14, 22)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=9, 13)
CAZ-AVI44113
Meropenem44143

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter cloacae (n=5, 5)Escherichia coli (n=4, 4)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14, 20)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=3, 6)
CAZ-AVI44111
Meropenem44131

[back to top]

The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit

The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants with favorable responses (Number)
Enterobacter aerogenes (n=4, 2)Enterobacter cloacae (n=6, 6)Escherichia coli (n=6, 5)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=20, 30)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=11, 15)
CAZ-AVI354154
Meropenem254184

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

The number of patients discharged from hospital in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: up to 25 days from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with admission dateNumber of patients with at least one discharge1 discharge2 discharges>2 discharges
CAZ-AVI170717100
Meropenem182757410

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

The number of patients discharged from hospital in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: up to 25 days from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with admission dateNumber of patients with at least one discharge1 discharge2 discharges>2 discharges
CAZ-AVI25614814440
Meropenem26615515131

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

The number of patients discharged from hospital in the clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: up to 25 days from randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with admission dateNumber of patients with at least one discharge1 discharge2 discharges>2 discharges
CAZ-AVI35520620150
Meropenem36620620042

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI11231
Meropenem12328

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI9626
Meropenem11226

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI128385
Meropenem148315

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI8045
Meropenem8942

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorable
CAZ-AVI7037
Meropenem8335

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

"Per-patient favorable response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are eradicated or presumed eradicated. Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure." (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FavorableUnfavorableIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI956412
Meropenem1185412

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI25338
Meropenem26838

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI2925014
Meropenem3094516

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI12518
Meropenem13516

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI11012
Meropenem12612

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failureIndeterminate
CAZ-AVI143235
Meropenem161185

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at TOC Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses)

The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. (NCT01808092)
Timeframe: At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical cureClinical failure
CAZ-AVI19958
Meropenem21159

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cephalosporin Class Effects and Additional Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with Cephalosporin class effects (defined as adverse event of special interest (AEoSI) within the safety topics (ST) of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis) and additional AEs (which included AEs of seizures, diarrhea, renal disorder, and liver disorder relevant to the cephalosporin class within the ST and AEs with preferred term in the system organ class of nervous system disorder system organ class based on MedDRA 20.0) were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AE in the ST of DiarrheaAEoSI in the ST of Hypersensitivity/AnaphylaxisAE in the ST of Liver DisorderAE in the ST of Renal DisorderAEs with PTs in the Nervous System Disorder SOCAE of seizure
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole1.64.9001.60
Meropenem013.6004.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Day 7

CrCl is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GMFR), an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole00050.8
Meropenem00059.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

CrCl is a measure of GMFR, an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole00082.0
Meropenem00081.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit

CrCl is a measure of GMFR, an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole001.66.6
Meropenem0009.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit

CrCl is a measure of GMFR, an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole003.342.6
Meropenem00059.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter QTcF: > 450, >480 and >500 Millisecond (ms)

ECG parameters included maximum QT intervals using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Maximum QTcF >450 millisecond (ms); maximum QTcF >480 ms; and maximum QTcF >500 ms. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline until the EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 16)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Maximum QTcF Interval : >450 msMaximum QTcF Interval : >480 msMaximum QTcF Interval : >500 ms
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole1.61.60
Meropenem4.54.54.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cIAI, or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole91.8
Meropenem95.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

A participant was said to have clinical relapse if me either 1 of the following criteria: reappearance or worsening of signs and symptoms of cIAI that required further antimicrobial therapy and/or surgery, or death after TOC in which cIAI was contributory. LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole0
Meropenem0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

Favorable microbiological response was achieved when all baseline pathogens were eradicated or presumed eradicated based on investigator's discretion. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study if on oral switch therapy (which occurred within the maximum study treatment duration of 15 days). EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 up to 16), EOT visit (up to Day 17), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days) and LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EOIVEOTTOCLFU
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole96.090.090.090.0
Meropenem10010094.794.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR): Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cIAI, or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required, or improvement in participants who had switch to oral therapy and met the following criterion: afebrile (temperature <=38.0°C) for at least 24 hours, absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated c-reative-protein) from baseline and worsening of none. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study (if on oral switch therapy). TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: End of 72 hours study drug treatment on Day 1, EOIV (anytime from Day 4 up to 16), EOT visit (up to Day 17) and TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End 72 hours study medicationEOIVEOTTOC
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole98.098.194.292.9
Meropenem95.010010095.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

Favorable microbiological response was achieved when all baseline pathogens were eradicated or presumed eradicated based on investigator's discretion. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study if on oral switch therapy (which occurred within the maximum study treatment duration of 15 days). TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 up to 16), EOT visit (up to Day 17), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days) and LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EOIVEOTTOCLFU
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole97.591.790.089.2
Meropenem10010093.392.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to late follow-up (LFU) visit (20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment [IV or oral]) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAE and non-SAE. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole52.58.2
Meropenem59.14.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cIAI, or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study (if on oral switch therapy). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOT visit (up to Day 17)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole91.8
Meropenem100

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Ceftazidime and Avibactam

(NCT02475733)
Timeframe: 15, 30-90, 300-360 minutes post-dose on Day 3

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ceftazidime: 15 minute post-dose on Day 3Ceftazidime: 30-90 minute post-dose on Day 3Ceftazidime:300-360minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 15 minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 30-90 minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 300-360 minute post-dose on Day 3
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole63565.538048.04603.012186.26548.6821.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities: Chemistry (calcium: <0.7*lower limit of normal range [LLN] and >30 percent decrease from baseline [DFB]; alanine aminotransferase [ALT]: >3*upper limit of normal range [ULN] and >300 percent IFB; alanine aminotransferase [AST]: >3*ULN and >300 percent IFB) and hematology (platelets: >2*ULN and >100 percent IFB). LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemistry: CalciumChemistry: ALTChemistry: ASTHematology: Platelets
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole1.91.71.83.3
Meropenem0000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population

A participant was said to have clinical relapse if met either 1 of the following criteria: reappearance or worsening of signs and symptoms of cIAI that required further antimicrobial therapy and/or surgery, or death after TOC in which cIAI was contributory. LFU visit occurred within 20 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole0
Meropenem0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable Population

Emergent Infections was an intra-abdominal culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen during the course of active treatment with study therapy along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy, new infection was an intra-abdominal culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen at any time after study treatment has finished along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). Participants with any (super infections or new infections) of the infections were reported. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole0
Meropenem0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

Emergent infections were categorized as super infections and new infections. Superinfection: An intra-abdominal culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen during the course of active treatment with study therapy along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. New infection: An intra-abdominal culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen at any time after study treatment had finished along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. Participants with any (super infections or new infections) of the infections were reported. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 50 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole0
Meropenem0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of 72 Hours Treatment: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was defined as resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of complicated intra- abdominal infection (cIAIs), or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required, or improvement but not enough to switch to oral therapy and still on IV study drug at end of 72 hours and had met following criterion: absence of new signs and symptoms, improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign (fever, pain, tenderness, elevated White Blood Cells [WBCs], elevated c-reactive protein) from baseline and no worsening symptom/sign. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: End of 72 hours study drug treatment on Day 1

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole93.4
Meropenem90.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cIAI or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required, or improvement in participants who had switch to oral therapy and met the following criterion: afebrile (temperature <=38.0°C) for at least 24 hours, absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated c-reative-protein) from baseline and worsening of none. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole96.7
Meropenem100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventiondegree Celsius (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole37.35-0.78
Meropenem37.16-0.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionkilograms (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole40.58-0.38
Meropenem38.35-1.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole102.1-15.2
Meropenem103.0-15.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole22.4-1.3
Meropenem22.9-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP: BaselineSBP: Change at EOIVDBP: BaselineDBP: Change at EOIV
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole109.7-4.063.51.3
Meropenem111.6-6.063.1-2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings at End of Intravenous Therapy (EOIV) Visit

Physical examination included an assessment of the following: general appearance, skin, head and neck (including ears, eyes, nose and throat), lymph nodes, thyroid, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, abdomen, musculoskeletal system (including spine and extremities), and neurological system. Participants with new or aggravated abnormal physical examination findings with regard to baseline findings were reported. Abnormality in physical examinations were based on blinded observer's discretion. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02475733)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 up to 16)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AbdomenCardiovascular SystemGeneral AppearanceHead and NeckLymph NodesMusculoskeletal SystemNeurological SystemRespiratory SystemSkinThyroid
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) Plus Metronidazole6.601.600003.31.60
Meropenem18.2000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionkilogram (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Cefepime25.240.14
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)24.55-0.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventiondegree Celsius (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Cefepime37.49-0.90
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)37.67-1.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at TOC: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at TOC

Favourable clinical response was defined as resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTIs or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was needed. Participants who met the following criterion: Incomplete resolution or worsening of cUTI signs or symptoms or development of new signs or symptoms requiring alternative non-study antimicrobial therapy or death in which cUTI was contributory. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)93.9
Cefepime85.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at EOT

Favourable clinical response was defined as a CR cure. Cure was defined as resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required. EOT visit occurred within 48hr after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study(if on oral switch therapy). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOT visit (up to Day 16)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)98.0
Cefepime94.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at EOIV

Favourable clinical response was defined as a CR of improvement and cure. Cure was defined as resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required. Clinical Improvement included all the participants who had switched to oral therapy and had meet the following criterion: afebrile (temperature <=38.0°C) for at least 24 hours, absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated c-reactive-protein) from baseline and worsening of none. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)98.1
Cefepime95.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at LFU

A participant was said to have clinical relapse if met either 1 of the following criteria: reappearance or worsening of signs and symptoms of cUTI that required further antimicrobial therapy and/or surgery or death after TOC in which cUTI was contributory. LFU visit occurred within 20 to 36 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: LFU visit (anytime up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)6.8
Cefepime0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Cefepime119.1-17.1
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)111.5-11.9

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Ceftazidime and Avibactam

(NCT02497781)
Timeframe: 15, 30-90, 300-360 minutes post-dose on Day 3

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ceftazidime: 15 minute post-dose on Day 3Ceftazidime: 30-90 minute post-dose on Day 3Ceftazidime:300-360minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 15 minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 30-90 minute post-dose on Day 3Avibactam: 300-360 minute post-dose on Day 3
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)61411.247638.57285.79577.47046.4936.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to late follow-up (LFU) visit (20 to 36 days after last dose of study treatment [IV or oral]) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAE and non-SAE. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Cefepime53.67.1
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)53.711.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities: hematology (platelets: <0.4*lower limit of normal [LLN], >2*upper limit of normal [ULN], >40% decrease from baseline [DFB],>100% Increase from baseline [IFB]; Chemistry (Bicarbonate: <0.7*LLN, >1.3*ULN, >50% DFB, >30% IFB). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemistry: BicarbonateHematology: Platelets
Cefepime00
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)2.01.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

PCS criteria for abnormal value of ECG parameters: QT interval >=450 milliseconds (msec); 480 msec; >=500 msec; Increase from baseline (IFB) of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec; Decrease from baseline (DFB) of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec. QT interval using Bazett's correction (QTcB): >=450 milliseconds (msec); 480 msec; >=500 msec; Increase from baseline (IFB) of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec; DFB of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec. QT interval using Fridericia's correction (QTcF): >=450 msec; 480 msec; >=500 msec; IFB of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec; DFB of >=30 msec; >=60 msec and >90 msec. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline until the EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
QT Interval : >450 msecQT Interval : >480 msecQT Interval : >500 msecMaximum IFB QT Interval : > 30 msecMaximum IFB QT Interval : > 60 msecMaximum IFB QT Interval : >90 msecMaximum DFB QT Interval : > 30 msecMaximum DFB QT Interval : > 60 msecMaximum DFB QT Interval : > 90 msecQTcB Interval : >450 msecQTcB Interval : >480 msecQTcB Interval : >500 msecMaximum IFB QTcB Interval : > 30 msecMaximum IFB QTcB Interval : > 60 msecMaximum IFB QTcB Interval : > 90 msecMaximum DFB QTcB Interval : > 30 msecMaximum DFB QTcB Interval : > 60 msecMaximum DFB QTcB Interval : > 90 msecQTcF Interval : >450 msecQTcF Interval : >480 msecQTcF Interval : >500 msecMaximum IFB QTcF Interval : > 30 msecMaximum IFB QTcF Interval : > 60 msecMaximum IFB QTcF Interval : > 90 msecMaximum DFB QTcF Interval : > 30 msecMaximum DFB QTcF Interval : > 60 msecMaximum DFB QTcF Interval : > 90 msec
Cefepime00014.33.6017.9003.60014.33.607.13.63.600014.33.6010.73.60
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)00019.47.53.09.04.51.516.411.97.517.97.53.010.46.01.56.06.06.017.93.03.09.03.01.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Microbiological Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population

Favourable microbiological response was achieved when all baseline pathogens were eradicated. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study if on oral switch therapy (which occurred within the maximum study treatment duration of 14 days). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 to 15), EOT visit (up to Day 16)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EOIVEOT
Cefepime100100
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)97.197.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Microbiological Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

Favourable microbiological response was achieved when all baseline pathogens were eradicated. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. EOT visit occurred within 48 hours after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study if on oral switch therapy (which occurred within the maximum study treatment duration of 14 days). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 to 15), EOT visit(up to Day 16)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EOIVEOT
Cefepime78.373.9
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)81.583.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Combined Response: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

Combined response was the combined assessment of clinical response and microbiological response. Favorable clinical response was defined as a clinical response of improvement and cure (at EOIV) and a clinical response of cure (at TOC). Cure defined as: resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTI/improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy required. Improvement defined as: participants who switched to oral therapy and had afebrile (temperature<=38.0°C) for >=24 hr; absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (ie, fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated CRP) from Baseline and worsening of none. Favourable microbiological response was absence of the original baseline pathogen in source specimen. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 to 15), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Favourable at EOIVFavourable at TOC
Cefepime78.360.9
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)79.672.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR) at End of 72 Hours Treatment: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set at 72 Hours

Favourable clinical response was defined as a CR of improvement and cure. Cure was defined as resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required. Clinical Improvement included all the participants who had improvement but not enough to switch to oral therapy and were still on IV study drug at End of 72 hours and had meet the following criterion: absence of new signs and symptoms, and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated CRP) from baseline, and with no worsening of any symptom or sign. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: End of 72 hours study drug treatment on Day 1

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)100
Cefepime95.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population

Emergent infections were categorized as super-infection and new infections. Superinfection: A urine culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen during the course of active treatment with study therapy along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. New infection: A urine culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen at any time after study treatment had finished along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. Percentage of participants with any (super infections or new infections) of the infections were reported. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 50 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)7.3
Cefepime0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Emergent Infections: Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

Emergent infections were categorized as super-infection and new infections. Superinfection: A urine culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen during the course of active treatment with study therapy along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. New infection: A urine culture identified pathogen other than a baseline pathogen at any time after study treatment had finished along with worsening signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy. Percentage of participants with any (super infections or new infections) of the infections were reported. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 50 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)5.6
Cefepime0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set at LFU

A participant was said to have clinical relapse if met either 1 of the following criteria: reappearance or worsening of signs and symptoms of cUTI that required further antimicrobial therapy and/or surgery, or death after TOC in which cUTI was contributory. LFU visit occurred within 20 to 36 days after last dose of study treatment (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: LFU visit (anytime up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)12.5
Cefepime0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was defined as a CR of improvement and cure(at end of 72 hours(hr) and EOIV) and a CR of cure(at EOT and TOC).Cure is resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTI/improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy required.Improvement is:1)at end of 72hr study drug treatment: improvement but not enough to switch to oral therapy and still on IV study drug at end of 72hr and meet following criterion: Absence of new signs/symptoms, and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign(ie, fever,pain,tenderness,elevated WBCs,elevated CRP) from Baseline,and with no worsening of any symptom/sign. 2) at EOIV: participants who switched to oral therapy and had afebrile(temperature<=38.0°C) for >=24hr;absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign from Baseline and worsening of none.EOT visit occurred within 48hr after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study(if on oral switch therapy). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15), EOT visit (up to Day 16), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EOIVEOTTOC
Cefepime10010087.5
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)10010092.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Microbiological ITT (Micro-ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was defined as a CR of improvement and cure(at end of 72 hours(hr) and EOIV) and a CR of cure(at EOT and TOC).Cure is resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTI/improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy required.Improvement is:1)at end of 72hr study drug treatment: improvement but not enough to switch to oral therapy and still on IV study drug at end of 72hr and meet following criterion: Absence of new signs/symptoms, and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign(ie, fever,pain,tenderness,elevated WBCs,elevated CRP) from Baseline,and with no worsening of any symptom/sign. 2) at EOIV: participants who switched to oral therapy and had afebrile(temperature<=38.0°C) for >=24hr;absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign from Baseline and worsening of none.EOT visit occurred within 48hr after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study(if on oral switch therapy). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: End of 72 hours study drug treatment, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15), EOT visit (up to Day 16), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of 72 hoursEOIVEOTTOC
Cefepime95.795.795.782.6
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)90.796.390.788.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favourable Clinical Response (CR): Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Population

Favorable CR was defined as a CR of improvement and cure(at end of 72 hours(hr) and EOIV) and a CR of cure(at EOT and TOC).Cure is resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTI/improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy required.Improvement is:1)at end of 72hr study drug treatment: improvement but not enough to switch to oral therapy and still on IV study drug at end of 72hr and meet following criterion: Absence of new signs/symptoms, and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign(ie, fever,pain,tenderness,elevated WBCs,elevated CRP) from Baseline,and with no worsening of any symptom/sign. 2) at EOIV: participants who switched to oral therapy and had afebrile(temperature<=38.0°C) for >=24hr;absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom/sign from Baseline and worsening of none.EOT visit occurred within 48hr after completion of the last dose of oral switch therapy or at time of premature discontinuation/early withdrawal from study(if on oral switch therapy). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: End of 72 hours study drug treatment, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15), EOT visit (up to Day 16), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of 72 hoursEOIVEOTTOC
Cefepime86.289.789.782.8
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)88.291.288.286.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit

CrCl is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GMFR), an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Cefepime0041.758.3
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)0025.075.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

CrCl is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GMFR), an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Cefepime0013.686.4
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)0020.080.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) at Day 7

CrCl is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GMFR), an index of kidney function. It is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Percentage of participants with CrCl in the following categories were reported: <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m^2, >=50 mL/min/1.73 m^2 to <80 mL/min/1.73 m^2, and >=80 mL/min/1.73 m^2. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CrCl: <30mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=30 to <50mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=50 to <80mL/min/1.73 m^2CrCl: >=80mL/min/1.73 m^2
Cefepime000100
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)0011.188.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Combined Response: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Population

Combined response was the combined assessment of clinical response and microbiological response. Favorable clinical response was defined as a clinical response of improvement and cure (at EOIV) and a clinical response of cure (at TOC). Cure defined as: resolution of all acute signs/symptoms of cUTI/improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy required. Improvement defined as: participants who switched to oral therapy and had afebrile (temperature<=38.0°C) for >=24 hr; absence of new and improvement in at least 1 symptom or sign (ie, fever, pain, tenderness, elevated WBCs, elevated CRP) from Baseline and worsening of none. Favourable microbiological response was absence of the original baseline pathogen in source specimen. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of any study drug (IV or oral). (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (Day 4 to 15), TOC visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Favourable at EOIVFavourable at TOC
Cefepime10068.8
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)97.180.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cephalosporin Class Effects and Additional Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with Cephalosporin class effects (defined as adverse event of special interest (AEoSI) within the safety topics (ST) of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis) and additional AEs (which included AEs of diarrhea, renal disorder, hematological disorder and liver disorder relevant to the cephalosporin class within the safety topics (ST) based on MedDRA 20.0) were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline until the LFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 50 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AE in the ST of DiarrheaAE in the ST of Hematological DisordersAEoSI in the ST of Hypersensitivity/AnaphylaxisAE in the ST of Liver DisorderAE in the ST of Renal Disorder
Cefepime10.707.100
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)7.507.51.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

Physical examination included an assessment of the following: general appearance, skin, head and neck (including ears, eyes, nose and throat), lymph nodes, thyroid, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, abdomen, musculoskeletal system (including spine and extremities), and neurological system. Participants with new or aggravated abnormal physical examination findings with regard to baseline findings were reported. Abnormality in physical examinations were based on blinded observer's discretion. EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AbdomenCardiovascular SystemGeneral AppearanceHead and NeckLymph NodesMusculoskeletal SystemNeurological SystemRespiratory SystemSkinThyroid
Cefepime3.6003.63.60007.10
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)01.501.50003.03.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP: BaselineSBP: Change at EOIVDBP: BaselineDBP: Change at EOIV
Cefepime111.9-5.469.1-5.0
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)105.6-1.062.60.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIV) Visit

EOIV visit occurred within 24 hours after completion of last infusion of the study drug. (NCT02497781)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOIV visit (anytime from Day 4 to 15)

,
Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOIV
Cefepime27.0-2.6
Ceftazidime- Avibactam (CAZ-AVI)25.8-2.5

[back to top]

Peak Sputum Concentration

(NCT02504827)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
IV Ceftazidime/Avibactam2.5

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT02504827)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
IV Ceftazidime/Avibactam85.87

[back to top]

Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Half Life Parameter in Intensive Care Patients

(NCT02822950)
Timeframe: 2,4,6, 8 hours after receiving the drug

InterventionHours (Mean)
Ceftazadime/Avibactam4.3

[back to top]

Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic (PK) Maximum Serum Concentration in Intensive Care Patients

(NCT02822950)
Timeframe: 2,4,6, 8 hours after receiving the drug

Interventionmg/liter (Mean)
Ceftazadime/Avibactam48

[back to top]

Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Clearance of Drug Parameter in Intensive Care Patients

(NCT02822950)
Timeframe: 2,4,6, 8 hours after receiving the drug

InterventionLiters/hour (Mean)
Ceftazadime/Avibactam6.4

[back to top]

Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic Area Under Serum Curve (mg*h/L) Parameter in Intensive Care Patients

(NCT02822950)
Timeframe: 2,4,6, 8 hours after receiving the drug

Interventionmg*hour/liters (Mean)
Ceftazadime/Avibactam343

[back to top]

Mean (SD) Ceftazadime/Avibactam Pharmacokinetic (PK) Volume of Distribution Parameter in Intensive Care Patients

(NCT02822950)
Timeframe: 2,4,6, 8 hours after receiving the drug

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Ceftazadime/Avibactam34

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RCmax PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the Cmax on Day 7 by the Cmax on Day 1. Cmax (ug/mL) was estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.50.830.960.95
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.00.911.010.97

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis using linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. AVYCAZ CI and ATM CI were not reported. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ IV35.80223.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis using linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. AVYCAZ CI and ATM CI were not reported. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.544.00255.00221.00
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.042.40241.00295.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-inf) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV263.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-inf) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI42.40308.00
AVYCAZ IV32.10235.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(0-Inf)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-inf) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.539.10277.00245.00
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.036.10249.00317.00

[back to top]

Concentration of Study Drug at Steady State After Continuous Infusion (Css)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Css (ug/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data for AVYCAZ CI and ATM CI. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI4.3427.60

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM CI93.80
ATM IV89.10

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Vss (L) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

InterventionL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV14.30

[back to top]

Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, by System Organ Class (SOC) and Maximum Severity Level

Number of participants with an AE are summarized by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and severity. Each participant is only counted once at the highest severity recorded. For clinical laboratory tests, mild abnormal laboratory values that were not, in the investigator's opinion, medically significant were not reported as adverse events. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 14

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cardiac Disorders72375878Cardiac Disorders72375879Cardiac Disorders72375880Cardiac Disorders72375881Cardiac Disorders72375882Cardiac Disorders72375883Eye disorders72375879Eye disorders72375880Eye disorders72375881Eye disorders72375882Eye disorders72375883Eye disorders72375878Gastrointestinal Disorders72375878Gastrointestinal Disorders72375879Gastrointestinal Disorders72375880Gastrointestinal Disorders72375881Gastrointestinal Disorders72375882Gastrointestinal Disorders72375883General disorders and administration site conditions72375878General disorders and administration site conditions72375879General disorders and administration site conditions72375880General disorders and administration site conditions72375881General disorders and administration site conditions72375882General disorders and administration site conditions72375883Infections and infestations72375878Infections and infestations72375879Infections and infestations72375880Infections and infestations72375881Infections and infestations72375882Infections and infestations72375883Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375878Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375879Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375880Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375881Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375882Injury, poisoning and procedural complications72375883Investigations72375878Investigations72375879Investigations72375880Investigations72375881Investigations72375882Investigations72375883Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375878Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375879Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375880Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375881Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375882Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders72375883Nervous system disorders72375878Nervous system disorders72375879Nervous system disorders72375880Nervous system disorders72375881Nervous system disorders72375882Nervous system disorders72375883Renal and urinary disorders72375878Renal and urinary disorders72375879Renal and urinary disorders72375880Renal and urinary disorders72375881Renal and urinary disorders72375882Renal and urinary disorders72375883Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375878Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375879Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375880Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375881Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375882Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders72375883Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375878Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375879Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375880Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375881Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375882Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders72375883Vascular disorders72375878Vascular disorders72375879Vascular disorders72375880Vascular disorders72375881Vascular disorders72375882Vascular disorders72375883
MildSevereNoneModerate
AVYCAZ IV2
AVYCAZ CI2
ATM IV4
ATM CI1
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.53
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.02
AVYCAZ IV1
AVYCAZ CI0
ATM IV0
ATM CI0
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.51
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.00
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.50
AVYCAZ IV5
AVYCAZ CI6
ATM CI6
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.54
AVYCAZ IV0
AVYCAZ IV8
AVYCAZ CI8
ATM IV8
ATM CI7
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.58
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.08
AVYCAZ IV3
AVYCAZ CI1
ATM IV2
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.55
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.03
AVYCAZ CI7
ATM IV6
ATM CI8
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.05
ATM IV3
ATM CI2
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.04
ATM IV1
AVYCAZ IV6
ATM IV7
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.57
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.01
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.07
AVYCAZ CI4
ATM CI3
AVYCAZ IV4
AVYCAZ CI3
AVYCAZ IV7
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.52
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.56
ATM IV5
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.06

[back to top]

Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CL (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
InterventionL/h (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.512.907.266.18
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.014.308.136.47

[back to top]

Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CL (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
InterventionL/h (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI12.206.80
AVYCAZ IV15.808.59

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Vss (L) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
InterventionL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.518.5014.5011.50
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.024.3019.2013.80

[back to top]

Total Body Plasma Clearance of Study Drug (CL)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CL (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

InterventionL/h (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV7.74

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionh (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.51.991.861.99
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.01.881.882.00

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RAUC PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the AUC(0-8) (avibactam and ceftazidime) or AUC(0-6) (aztreonam) on Day 7 by the AUC(0-Tau) on Day 1. AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-6) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 7 and AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 1 were estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis with the linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV0.90

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionh (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI2.852.25
AVYCAZ IV1.822.14

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Data of Study Drug During the Dosing Interval on Day 1 [AUC(0-Tau)]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis using linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. AVYCAZ CI and ATM CI were not reported. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionµg*hr/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV266.00

[back to top]

Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionh (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.51.811.931.99
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.01.991.932.06

[back to top]

Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionh (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI2.002.06
AVYCAZ IV1.892.06

[back to top]

Time of Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug After the First Dose (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionh (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM CI2.00
ATM IV1.94

[back to top]

Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CLR (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma and urine concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. Renal clearance was calculated as Ae(0-8)/AUC(0-8) for ceftazidime and avibactam and as AE(0-4)/AUC(0-4) for aztreonam where Ae(0-8) and Ae(0-4) are the amounts of study drug excreted into the urine from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively, and AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-4) are the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionL/h (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.511.407.104.61
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.014.709.424.50

[back to top]

Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CLR (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma and urine concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. Renal clearance was calculated as Ae(0-8)/AUC(0-8) for ceftazidime and avibactam and as AE(0-4)/AUC(0-4) for aztreonam where Ae(0-8) and Ae(0-4) are the amounts of study drug excreted into the urine from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively, and AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-4) are the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionL/h (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI11.706.92
AVYCAZ IV11.105.70

[back to top]

Renal Clearance of Study Drug (CLR)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CLR (L/h) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma and urine concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. Renal clearance was calculated as Ae(0-8)/AUC(0-8) for ceftazidime and avibactam and as AE(0-4)/AUC(0-4) for aztreonam where Ae(0-8) and Ae(0-4) are the amounts of study drug excreted into the urine from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively, and AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-4) are the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to 8 or 4 h post-dose, respectively. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionL/h (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM CI3.90
ATM IV4.25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 2 (Moderate) or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Event

Adverse events include local and systemic reactions. All Grade 2 (moderate) adverse events were reported, regardless of relationship to study product. Number of participants with an AE are summarized by MedDRA system organ class (SOC). Each participant is only counted once per SOC. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 11

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cardiac DisordersEye disordersGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsInfections and infestationsInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsInvestigationsNervous system disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ATM CI11000510
ATM IV00110310
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.510000401
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.000001400
AVYCAZ CI00000100
AVYCAZ IV10000300

[back to top]

Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmin (ug/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.50.746.2913.30
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.00.726.2818.90

[back to top]

Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmin (ug/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ IV0.525.52

[back to top]

Minimum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing on Day 1 (Cmin)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmin (ug/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV13.90

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.514.2088.2074.40
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.012.8069.8090.30

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI4.5831.80
AVYCAZ IV10.7063.60

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV78.40

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.515.8082.7071.20
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.014.3070.3093.20

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Study Drug After the First Dose (Cmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Cmax (ug/mL) PK parameter after the first dose were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI13.1071.20
AVYCAZ IV12.4067.90

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) of Study Drug Following Multiple Daily Dosing (Tmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Tmax (h) PK parameter following multiple daily dosing were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionh (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV2.00

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RAUC PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the AUC(0-8) (avibactam and ceftazidime) or AUC(0-6) (aztreonam) on Day 7 by the AUC(0-Tau) on Day 1. AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-6) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 7 and AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 1 were estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis with the linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ IV0.870.98

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution of Study Drug at Steady-state Based on the Last Observed Concentration (Vss)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Vss (L) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 7 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
InterventionL (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ CI17.4012.60
AVYCAZ IV25.9019.90

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve of Study Drug) [RAUC]

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RAUC PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the AUC(0-8) (avibactam and ceftazidime) or AUC(0-6) (aztreonam) on Day 7 by the AUC(0-Tau) on Day 1. AUC(0-8) and AUC(0-6) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 7 and AUC(0-Tau) (µg*hr/mL) on Day 1 were estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis with the linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidimeAztreonam
AVYCAZ + ATM 1.50.800.950.91
AVYCAZ + ATM 2.00.820.950.94

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RCmax PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the Cmax on Day 7 by the Cmax on Day 1. Cmax (ug/mL) was estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM IV0.88

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration) (RCmax)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the RCmax PK parameter were estimated for ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam by dividing the Cmax on Day 7 by the Cmax on Day 1. Cmax (ug/mL) was estimated from plasma concentration-time data using Non-compartmental analysis for AVYCAZ IV, ATM IV, AVYCAZ + ATM 1.5, and AVYCAZ + ATM 2.0. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

InterventionAccumulation ratio (Mean)
AvibactamCeftazidime
AVYCAZ IV0.880.96

[back to top]

Concentration of Study Drug at Steady State After Continuous Infusion (Css)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the Css (ug/mL) PK parameter were estimated from the Day 1 ceftazidime, avibactam, and/or aztreonam plasma concentration-time data for AVYCAZ CI and ATM CI. (NCT03978091)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Aztreonam
ATM CI58.80

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Ceftazidime and Avibactam Among Critically-ill Patients

PK samples obtained around standard of care dosing regimens immediately before and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration (NCT04358991)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionmcg/mL (Median)
Ceftazidime CmaxAvibactam Cmax
Subjects Included80.615.9

[back to top]

Time for Cmax (Tmax) of ATM

The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionHours (Median)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function2.92
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment2.92

[back to top]

Tmax of AVI

The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionHours (Median)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function2.46
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment2.92

[back to top]

Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)

AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionMicrogram*hour per milliliter (ug*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function922.9
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment733.5

[back to top]

Vss of AVI

Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function37.37
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment27.78

[back to top]

Vz of AVI

The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function55.83
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment30.14

[back to top]

Ae0-tau of AVI

The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Interventionmg (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function465.6
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment270.0

[back to top]

Ae0-tau% of AVI

The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

InterventionPercent of dose (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function93.19
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment119.9

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATM

The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionLiters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function24.25
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment18.79

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATM

Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function23.70
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment18.46

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATM

The AUC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function230.8
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment244.3

[back to top]

AUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)

AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function164.8
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment204.6

[back to top]

AUC0-tau of AVI

The UC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).A (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function41.19
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment68.31

[back to top]

CL of AVI

The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function12.16
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment3.295

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of ATM

The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionLiters per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function6.499
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment2.761

[back to top]

CLr of AVI

The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function11.30
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment3.948

[back to top]

Cmax of AVI

The Cmax of AVI was observed directly from data. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function11.08
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment11.35

[back to top]

Ctau of AVI

The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function3.100
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment5.597

[back to top]

Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATM

The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

InterventionMilligram (mg) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function1047
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment361.2

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATM

The Cmax of ATM was observed directly from data. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (ug/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function57.34
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment43.34

[back to top]

Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATM

The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function21.43
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment18.55

[back to top]

Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATM

The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

InterventionPercent of dose (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function69.68
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment53.51

[back to top]

Renal Clearance (CLr) of ATM

The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2). (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function4.527
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment1.477

[back to top]

t1/2 of AVI

The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionHours (Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function3.188
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment6.524

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATM

The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

InterventionHours (Mean)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function2.605
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment4.902

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with AEsParticipants with serious AEsParticipants with severe AEsParticipants discontinued from study due to AEsParticipants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue studyParticipants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function200000
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment300000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event attributed to the study medication. A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with AEsParticipants with serious AEsParticipants with severe AEsParticipants discontinued from study due to AEsParticipants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue studyParticipants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function000000
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment300000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

Following laboratory parameters were abnormal (without regard to baseline abnormality): hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, activated partial thromboplastin time, protein, urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, urine glucose, and urine protein. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hemoglobin (gram per deciliter [g/dL]) <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN)Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLNErythrocytes (10^6 per cubic millimeter [10^6/mm^3]) <0.8*LLNLymphocytes (10^3 per cubic millimeter [10^3/mm^3]) <0.8*LLNNeutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*upper limit of normal (ULN)Activated partial thromboplastin time (second) >1.1*ULNProtein (g/dL) <0.8*LLNUrea Nitrogen (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) >1.3*ULNCreatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULNUrate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULNUrine glucose (mg/dL) >=1Urine protein (mg/dL) >=1
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function000000000000
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment334111155331

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs Data

Categorical post-baseline vital signs included: (1) pulse rate: value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm), lager than (>) 120 bpm; (2) supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP): value <50 mmHg, change of more than or equal to (>=) 20 mmHg increase, change of >=20 mmHg decrease; (3) supine systolic blood pressure (SBP): value <90 mmHg, change of >=30 mmHg increase, change of >=30 mmHg decrease. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pulse rate <40 bpmPulse rate >120 bpmSupine DBP <50 mmHgSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg increaseSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg decreaseSupine SBP <90 mmHgSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg increaseSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg decrease
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function00000000
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment00000010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval >500 milliseconds (msec); maximum QTc interval of >=450 msec to less than or equal to (<=) 480 msec, >480 msec, and >500 msec and a maximum change of <30 change<=60 or >60 msec from baseline; maximum QTcF (Fridericia's Correction) interval of >=450 msec to <=480 msec, >480 msec, and >500 msec and a maximum change of <30 change<=60 or >60 msec from baseline. (NCT04486625)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QT interval value > 500 msec450 msec<= QTc interval value <=480 msecQTc interval value >480 msecQTc interval value >500 msec30 msec< QTc interval change <=60 msecQTc interval change >60 msec450 msec<= QTcF interval value <=480 msecQTcF interval value >480 msecQTcF interval value >500 msec30 msec< QTcF interval change <=60 msecQTcF interval change >60 msec
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function00000000000
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment02000020000

[back to top]

Time of Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)2.922.92

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ Following Multiple Dosing (Rac) on Day 4 of Aztreonam

Rac was obtained from AUCtau at steady state (Day 4) divided by AUCtau after single dose (Day 1). AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1.204

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC6) on Day 1 of Aztreonam

The area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated from time 0 to 6 hours post dose. AUC6 was computed using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1

Interventionnanograms/millilitre/hour (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)236.7

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the End of the Dosing Interval (τ), Where τ=6 Hours (AUCtau) on Day 4 of Avibactam

AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)44.41

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the End of the Dosing Interval (τ), Where τ=6 Hours (AUCtau) on Day 4 of Aztreonam

AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)285.2

[back to top]

Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-State (AUC24,ss) on Day 4 of Avibactam

AUC24,ss was defined as total daily area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to 24 hours at steady-state. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)177.7

[back to top]

Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-State (AUC24,ss) on Day 4 of Aztreonam

AUC24,ss was defined as total daily area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to 24 hours at steady-state. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1142

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ Following Multiple Dosing (Rac) on Day 4 of Avibactam

Rac was obtained from AUCtau at steady state (Day 4) divided by AUCtau after single dose (Day 1). AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1.049

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

Vz was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vss was the Vz at steady-state. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)21.3617.96

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Apparent volume of distribution (Vz) was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vss was the Vz at steady-state. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)13.6912.81

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

Vz was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)30.1465.41

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Vz was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)14.0914.22

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to 24 hours post dose. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)47.3349.47

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs

Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: increase or decrease from baseline in supine Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) >=30 mm Hg and increase or decrease from baseline in supine Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) >=20 mm Hg. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the last dose of study treatment date +28 +7 days (up to 2 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Change >= 20 mmHg increase from baselineSupine Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Change >= 30 mmHg increase from baselineSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Change >= 20 mmHg decrease from baselineSupine Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): Change >= 30 mmHg decrease from baseline
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)0000

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to 24 hours post dose. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)289.6337.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

AUCinf was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)47.2949.59

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

AUCinf was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)289.2337.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

AUClast is area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero (pre-dose) to the last measured concentration. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)47.2349.47

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

AUClast is area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero (pre-dose) to the last measured concentration. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)287.8336.4

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

CL was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the body. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionlitre per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)10.5611.26

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

CL was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the body. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionlitre per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)5.1885.261

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

Cmax was the maximum observed plasma concentration and was directly observed from data. Concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were set to zero. Geometric Mean analysis was on the log scale. Zero values were not included in geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation calculation. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)13.9314.03

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Cmax was the maximum observed plasma concentration and was directly observed from data. Concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were set to zero. Geometric Mean analysis was on the log scale. Zero values were not included in geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation calculation. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (ug/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)69.4479.66

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

"ECG categorical summarization criteria: 1. PR interval (the interval between the start of the P wave and the start of the QRS complex, corresponding to the time between the onset of the atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization): a) greater than or equal to (>=) 300 millisecond (msec), b) >=25% increase when baseline is > 200 msec or >=50% increase when baseline is less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec.~2. QRS duration (time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization): a) >=140 msec, b) >=50% increase from baseline.~3. QTcF interval (QT corrected using the Fridericia formula): a) >450 msec and <=480 msec, b) >480 msec and <=500 msec, c) >500 msec, d) >30 msec and <=60 msec increase from baseline, e) >60 msec increase from baseline." (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the last dose of study treatment date +28 +7 days (up to 2 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PR INTERVAL NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (msec): %Change >= 25/50%QRS INTERVAL NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (msec): %Change >= 50%QTCF - FRIDERICIA'S CORRECTION FORMULA NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (msec): 30 < Change <= 60QTCF - FRIDERICIA'S CORRECTION FORMULA NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (msec): Change > 60
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Assessments

Following laboratory parameters were assessed against pre-defined abnormality criteria: hematology (basophils); clinical chemistry (urate); urinalysis (urine hemoglobin, nitrite, urine erythrocytes). (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the last dose of study treatment date +28 +7 days (up to 2 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HEMATOLOGY: Basophils (10^3/mm^3) > 1.2x upper limit of normal (ULN)CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Urate (mg/dL) > 1.2x ULNURINALYSIS: URINE Hemoglobin >= 1URINALYSIS: URINE Erythrocytes >= 20
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1132

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC6) on Day 1 of Avibactam

The area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated from time 0 to 6 hours post dose. AUC6 was computed using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)42.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) means event between first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of death; inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; disability; congenital anomaly or deemed significant for any other reason. Symptoms of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) may include, but were not limited to, fever, chills, flushing, hypotension, dyspnea, wheezing, back pain, abdominal pain, and urticaria. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the last dose of study treatment date +28 +7 days (up to 2 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (all-causality)Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (treatment-related)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)21

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac,Cmax) on Day 4 of Aztreonam

Accumulation ratio based on maximum plasma concentration (Rac,cmax) was calculated as: Rac,Cmax = Cmax at steady state (Day 4) divided by Cmax at first dose (Day 1). The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1.149

[back to top]

Renal Clearance (CLr) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionlitre per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)12.0912.65

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac,Cmax) on Day 4 of Avibactam

Accumulation ratio based on maximum plasma concentration (Rac,cmax) was calculated as: Rac,Cmax = Cmax at steady state (Day 4) divided by Cmax at first dose (Day 1). The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 4

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1.006

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

Plasma terminal elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half at the terminal phase. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)2.0034.061

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

Plasma terminal elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half at the terminal phase. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)1.8901.886

[back to top]

Time of Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) on Day 1 & 4 of Avibactam

Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)2.442.46

[back to top]

Renal Clearance (CLr) on Day 1 & 4 of Aztreonam

CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). AUCtau was defined as area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau. The geometric coefficient of variation is expressed in percentage. (NCT04973826)
Timeframe: Post dose on day 1 and day 4

Interventionlitre per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 4
AZTREONAM-AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI)4.2774.487

[back to top]