cenicriviroc and Inflammation

cenicriviroc has been researched along with Inflammation* in 2 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for cenicriviroc and Inflammation

ArticleYear
Crosstalk network among multiple inflammatory mediators in liver fibrosis.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2019, Sep-07, Volume: 25, Issue:33

    Liver fibrosis is the common pathological basis of all chronic liver diseases, and is the necessary stage for the progression of chronic liver disease to cirrhosis. As one of pathogenic factors, inflammation plays a predominant role in liver fibrosis

    Topics: Animals; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Disease Models, Animal; Hepatic Stellate Cells; Hepatocytes; Humans; Imidazoles; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidinones; Signal Transduction; Sulfoxides; Ursodeoxycholic Acid

2019

Trials

1 trial(s) available for cenicriviroc and Inflammation

ArticleYear
Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TBR-652, a CCR5/CCR2 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2011, Jun-01, Volume: 57, Issue:2

    To determine the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of several dose levels of oral TBR-652 monotherapy in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.. Double-blind placebo-controlled study in the United States and Argentina.. Subjects were randomized in a ratio of 4:1 per dose level to TBR-652 (25, 50, 75, 100, or 150 mg) or placebo, taken once daily for 10 days. Changes from baseline in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts were measured through day 40 and for monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and IL-6 at day 10. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using noncompartmental statistics. Laboratory and clinical adverse events (AEs) and electrocardiogram changes were recorded.. Maximum median reductions in HIV-1 RNA values for the 25, 50, 75, and 150 mg doses were -0.7, -1.6, -1.8, and -1.7 log10 copies per milliliter, respectively. All changes were significant. Median time to nadir was 10-11 days. Suppression persisted well into the posttreatment period. Mean MCP-1 increased significantly by day 10 in the 50-mg and 150-mg dose groups. Effects on CD4 cell counts, hs-CRP, and IL-6 levels were negligible. TBR-652 was generally safe and well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to AEs.. TBR-652 caused significant reductions in HIV-1 RNA at all doses. Significant increases in MCP-1 levels suggested a strong CCR2 blockade. TBR-652 was generally well tolerated with no dose-limiting AEs. Pharmacodynamics indicate that TBR-652 warrants further investigation as an unboosted once-daily oral CCR5 antagonist with potentially important CCR2-mediated anti-inflammatory effects.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Biomarkers; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Double-Blind Method; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Imidazoles; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Receptors, CCR2; RNA, Viral; Sulfoxides; Young Adult

2011