Page last updated: 2024-12-10

lenabasum

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

lenabasum: a CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist; structure in first source [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3083542
CHEMBL ID456341
SCHEMBL ID26441
MeSH IDM0446561

Synonyms (49)

Synonym
ogn7x90bt8 ,
ab-iii-56
cpl 7075
ct 3
6h-dibenzo(b,d)pyran-9-carboxylic acid, 3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-, (6ar,10ar)
lenabasum [usan]
6h-dibenzo(b,d)pyran-9-carboxylic acid, 3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-, (6ar,10ar)-
unii-ogn7x90bt8
ip 751
(6ar,10ar)-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyl-2-octanyl)-6a,7,8,10a-tetrahydro-6h-benzo(c)chromene-9-carboxylic acid
ip-751
dmh-thc-11-oic
ct-3
ajulemic acid
cpl-7075
AJA ,
(6ar,10ar)-3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-6h-benzo[c]chromene-9-carboxylic acid
bdbm50005920
cpl7075
resunab
CHEMBL456341
lenabasum
jbt-101
hu-239
(6ar,10ar)-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydrobenzo[c]chromene-9-carboxylic acid
137945-48-3
SCHEMBL26441
lenabasum [inn]
(6ar, 10ar)-3-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl)-delta-8-tetrahydro-cannabinol-9-carboxylic acid
(6ar, 10ar)-3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-delta8-tetrahydro-cannabinol-9-carboxylic acid
(6ar,10ar)-3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-6h-benzo(c)chromene-9-carboxylic acid
ajulemic acid [mi]
lenabasum [who-dd]
6h-dibenzo(b,d)pyran-9-carboxylic acid, 3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-, (6ar-trans)-
CS-0025624
HY-106346
gtpl9772
ip751
DB12193
ajulemic acid; ct-3; ip-751; 1',1'-dimethylheptyl-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic acid
DTXSID40900959
Q3604498
BCP15191
D11312
lenabasum (usan/inn)
A935712
EX-A3627
6h-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-9-carboxylic acid, 3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-, (6ar,10ar)-
AKOS040747784

Research Excerpts

Overview

Lenabasum is a synthetic cannabinoid receptor type-2 (CB2) agonist able to exert potent anti-inflammatory effects, but its role on T cells remains unknown. Lenab asum reduces production of key airway pro-inflammatory cytokines known to play a role in cystic fibrosis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lenabasum is a synthetic cannabinoid receptor type-2 (CB2) agonist able to exert potent anti-inflammatory effects, but its role on T cells remains unknown."( Potent T cell-mediated anti-inflammatory role of the selective CB2 agonist lenabasum in multiple sclerosis.
Atamas, SP; Boffa, L; Chintalacharuvu, SR; Chiurchiù, V; Evron, T; Mercuri, NB; Saracini, S; Tiberi, M, 2022
)
2.39
"Lenabasum is a cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R) reverse agonist that demonstrates anti-inflammatory effects in vivo and in vitro in dermatomyositis (DM) and is currently being investigated for therapeutic potential. "( Cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R) distribution in dermatomyositis skin and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in vivo effects of Lenabasum
Bashir, MM; Bax, C; Chen, KL; Concha, JSS; Diaz, A; Grinnell, M; Li, Y; Maddukuri, S; Okawa, J; Patel, J; Ravishankar, A; Reddy, N; Werth, VP; White, B; Wysocka, M; Zeidi, M, 2022
)
2.37
"Lenabasum is a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist that triggers the resolution of inflammation."( Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bashir, MM; Concha, JSS; Constantine, S; Dgetluck, N; Feng, R; Gebre, K; Haber, J; Hejazi, E; Jadoo, AS; Okawa, J; Pena, SM; Reddy, N; Werth, VP; White, B; Zeidi, M, 2022
)
1.75
"Lenabasum is an oral synthetic cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist previously shown to reduce the production of key airway pro-inflammatory cytokines known to play a role in cystic fibrosis (CF). "( Anti-inflammatory effects of lenabasum, a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist, on macrophages from cystic fibrosis.
Andersen, ISG; Begum, N; Evron, T; Fantino, E; Morshed, MM; Sly, PD; Tarique, AA; Tepper, MA; Zhang, G, 2020
)
2.29
"Lenabasum is a cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2) agonist that resolves inflammation in a number of in vitro and in vivo models."( Safety and efficacy of lenabasum in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with cystic fibrosis.
Chmiel, JF; Colombo, C; Conley, B; Constantine, S; Dgetluck, N; Dinh, Q; Downey, DG; Dozor, AJ; Elborn, JS; Flume, P; Mazurek, H; Rachel, M; Sapiejka, E; White, B, 2021
)
1.65
"Lenabasum is a synthetic agonist of the cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) with anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. "( A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Drug-Drug Interaction Model for the CB2 Agonist Lenabasum.
Atamas, SP; Fu, Q; Jones, HM; Sun, G, 2021
)
2.28
"Lenabasum is a CYP substrate, and the model predicted lenabasum clearance of 51% by CYP2C9, 37% by CYP2C8, and 12% by CYP3A4."( A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Drug-Drug Interaction Model for the CB2 Agonist Lenabasum.
Atamas, SP; Fu, Q; Jones, HM; Sun, G, 2021
)
1.56

Treatment

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lenabasum treatment was well tolerated and was associated with greater improvement in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity and multiple efficacy outcomes."( Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bashir, MM; Concha, JSS; Constantine, S; Dgetluck, N; Feng, R; Gebre, K; Haber, J; Hejazi, E; Jadoo, AS; Okawa, J; Pena, SM; Reddy, N; Werth, VP; White, B; Zeidi, M, 2022
)
2.47

Toxicity

No deaths or excess in serious or severe adverse events related to lenabasum were observed. No participants discontinued the study.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" A recently published randomized double-blind crossover clinical trial described the pain-reducing effects and side effect profile of AJA on 21 patients with chronic neuropathic pain."( Pain measurements and side effect profile of the novel cannabinoid ajulemic acid.
Burstein, S; Hoy, L; Karst, M; Salim, K; Schneider, U, 2005
)
0.33
" Studies to date indicate a unique mechanism of action for AJA that may explain its lack of adverse side effects."( Ajulemic acid (IP-751): synthesis, proof of principle, toxicity studies, and clinical trials.
Burstein, S, 2005
)
0.33
" No deaths or serious or severe adverse events (AE) were considered related to lenabasum."( Safety and efficacy of lenabasum in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with cystic fibrosis.
Chmiel, JF; Colombo, C; Conley, B; Constantine, S; Dgetluck, N; Dinh, Q; Downey, DG; Dozor, AJ; Elborn, JS; Flume, P; Mazurek, H; Rachel, M; Sapiejka, E; White, B, 2021
)
1.16
" No serious or severe adverse events were related to lenabasum, and no participants discontinued the study."( Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bashir, MM; Concha, JSS; Constantine, S; Dgetluck, N; Feng, R; Gebre, K; Haber, J; Hejazi, E; Jadoo, AS; Okawa, J; Pena, SM; Reddy, N; Werth, VP; White, B; Zeidi, M, 2022
)
1.28
" No deaths or excess in serious or severe adverse events related to lenabasum were observed."( Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Agonist, in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis.
Bloom, BJ; Chung, L; Constantine, S; de Vries-Bouwstra, J; Denton, CP; Dgetluck, N; Dinh, Q; Distler, O; Finzel, S; Frech, TM; Furst, DE; Gordon, J; Hsu, V; Hummers, L; Jankowski, T; Jun, JB; Kafaja, S; Khanna, D; Kuwana, M; Lee, EB; Leszcyzński, P; Levy, Y; Litinsky, I; Matucci-Cerinic, M; Mayes, M; Sandorfi, N; Simms, RW; Spiera, R; Steen, V; Stevens, W; White, B, 2023
)
1.46

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Our model is a useful tool for predicting the pharmacokinetics of lenabasum and adjustments to its dosing in possible drug-drug interaction scenarios."( A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Drug-Drug Interaction Model for the CB2 Agonist Lenabasum.
Atamas, SP; Fu, Q; Jones, HM; Sun, G, 2021
)
1.08

Dosage Studied

A multinational double-blind study was conducted in 365 dcSSc patients. Patients were randomized and dosed 1:1:1 with lenabasum 20 mg, lenab asum 5 mg, or placebo.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Our model is a useful tool for predicting the pharmacokinetics of lenabasum and adjustments to its dosing in possible drug-drug interaction scenarios."( A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Drug-Drug Interaction Model for the CB2 Agonist Lenabasum.
Atamas, SP; Fu, Q; Jones, HM; Sun, G, 2021
)
1.08
"A multinational double-blind study was conducted in 365 dcSSc patients who were randomized and dosed 1:1:1 with lenabasum 20 mg, lenabasum 5 mg, or placebo, each twice daily and added to background treatments, including immunosuppressive therapies (IST)."( Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Agonist, in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis.
Bloom, BJ; Chung, L; Constantine, S; de Vries-Bouwstra, J; Denton, CP; Dgetluck, N; Dinh, Q; Distler, O; Finzel, S; Frech, TM; Furst, DE; Gordon, J; Hsu, V; Hummers, L; Jankowski, T; Jun, JB; Kafaja, S; Khanna, D; Kuwana, M; Lee, EB; Leszcyzński, P; Levy, Y; Litinsky, I; Matucci-Cerinic, M; Mayes, M; Sandorfi, N; Simms, RW; Spiera, R; Steen, V; Stevens, W; White, B, 2023
)
1.43
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (2)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.01900.00010.50779.6000AID1127482; AID1140580
Cannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.17050.00000.415610.0000AID1127483
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.92700.00010.12752.2400AID1127495
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (39)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
positive regulation of acute inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
axonal fasciculationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
memoryCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron projection developmentCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of serotonin secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fever generationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mast cell activationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dopamine secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
glucose homeostasisCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of action potentialCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood pressureCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
maternal process involved in female pregnancyCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of feeding behaviorCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of penile erectionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
retrograde trans-synaptic signaling by endocannabinoidCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic cytosolic calcium ion concentrationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
trans-synaptic signaling by endocannabinoid, modulating synaptic transmissionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of metabolic processCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte chemotaxisCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mast cell activationCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of action potentialCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of metabolic processCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (4)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cannabinoid receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (13)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
mitochondrial outer membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeletonCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
extrinsic component of cytoplasmic side of plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (30)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1140594Drug metabolism in human hepatocytes assessed as parent compound remaining after 2 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1154063Antinociceptive activity in CD1 mouse assessed as increase in paw withdrawal latency at 0.05 to 5 mg/kg, po measured after 90 mins post dose by hot plate test relative to vehicle-treated control2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 22, Issue:13
Ultrapure ajulemic acid has improved CB2 selectivity with reduced CB1 activity.
AID1140592Drug metabolism in dog hepatocytes assessed as parent compound remaining after 2 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140586Induction of LXA4 production in human blood at 1 to 30 uM incubated for 5 hrs by ELISA2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140580Binding affinity to CB1 receptor (unknown origin)2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140579Reversal of PAF-induced allodynia in ip dosed rat after 40 to 60 mins by paw withdrawal test2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID387957Antiproliferative activity against human HTB126 cells assessed as fluorescence units at 10 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Acylamido analogs of endocannabinoids selectively inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
AID387959Antiproliferative activity against human HTB126 cells assessed as fluorescence units at 10 uM after 72 hrs by luciferase assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Acylamido analogs of endocannabinoids selectively inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
AID1127484Selectivity ratio of Ki for human CB1 receptor to Ki for human CB2 receptor2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
AID387960Antiproliferative activity against human HTB126 cells assessed as fluorescence units at 10 uM after 96 hrs by luciferase assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Acylamido analogs of endocannabinoids selectively inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
AID1140590Plasma concentration in patient at 20 mg, po after 2 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1127482Binding affinity to human CB1 receptor2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
AID387966Antiproliferative activity against human HeLa cells at 10 uM after 48 hrs relative to control2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Acylamido analogs of endocannabinoids selectively inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
AID1140578Analgesic activity in rat assessed as reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia at 0.1 to 1 mg/kg, po2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID646683Ratio of drug uptake in brain to plasma of Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, sc2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 22, Issue:4
γ-Carbolines: a novel class of cannabinoid agonists with high aqueous solubility and restricted CNS penetration.
AID1140591Drug metabolism in rat hepatocytes assessed as parent compound remaining after 2 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1127483Binding affinity to human CB2 receptor2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
AID1140582Antiinflammatory activity in mouse assessed as reduction of IL-1beta/TNF-alpha-induced leukocyte count in air pouches at 0.2 mg/kg/day2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140589Induction of LXA4 production in human blood at 25 uM after 1 hr in presence of 12/15 LOX inhibitor baicalein relative to control2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140584Inhibition of MMP-3 release in TNF alpha-induced HFLS cells at 10 uM2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1127495Agonist activity at CB1 receptor (unknown origin) assessed as cAMP production2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
AID1140588Induction of LXA4 production in zymosan-A-induced FVB mouse peritonitis model at 1.5 mg/kg, iv by mass spectrometry relative to control2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140585Induction of LXA4 production in HFLS cells at 1 to 30 uM incubated for 1 hr followed by TNF-alpha challenge for 18 hrs by ELISA relative to control2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140583Antiinflammatory activity in mouse assessed as adhering leukocytes at 1 mg/kg, po after 6 hrs relative to vehicle-treated control2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140581Antiinflammatory activity in mouse assessed as reduction of IL-1beta/TNF-alpha-induced leukocyte count in air pouches at 0.1 mg/kg/day2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1140587Reduction of cell invasion to peritoneum in zymosan-A-induced FVB mouse peritonitis model at 1.5 mg/kg, iv by mass spectrometry2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID387958Antiproliferative activity against human HTB126 cells assessed as fluorescence units at 10 uM after 48 hrs by luciferase assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Acylamido analogs of endocannabinoids selectively inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
AID1140593Drug metabolism in cynomolgus monkey hepatocytes assessed as parent compound remaining after 2 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
The cannabinoid acids, analogs and endogenous counterparts.
AID1346701Human CB1 receptor (Cannabinoid receptors)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
AID1346728Human CB2 receptor (Cannabinoid receptors)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-14, Volume: 56, Issue:21
Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (48)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's25 (52.08)29.6817
2010's11 (22.92)24.3611
2020's12 (25.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 33.89

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be moderate demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index33.89 (24.57)
Research Supply Index4.04 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.64 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index44.43 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (33.89)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials8 (16.67%)5.53%
Reviews10 (20.83%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other30 (62.50%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (6)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JBT-101 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT03093402]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-21Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum in Cystic Fibrosis [NCT03451045]Phase 2447 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-22Completed
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of JBT-101 in Subjects With Dermatomyositis [NCT02466243]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor terminated open-label extension.)
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of JBT-101 in Cystic Fibrosis [NCT02465450]Phase 285 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-29Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum in Dermatomyositis [NCT03813160]Phase 3176 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-17Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis [NCT03398837]Phase 3365 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-18Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor terminated open-label extension)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT02465450 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events.
NCT02465450 (2) [back to overview]JBT-101 (Lenabasum) Plasma Concentrations on Day 84
NCT02466243 (2) [back to overview]Change in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) From Baseline in Part A.
NCT02466243 (2) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Outcomes From Baseline at 84 Days for Part A
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Indicating Clinical Benefit in Treatment Satisfaction
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Arthritis in BILAG-2004
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Physicians Indicating Participant Clinical Benefit in Treatment Satisfaction
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity - SELENA-SLEDAI Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004 Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity -Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity- Patient Global Assessment Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Physician Assessed Swollen Joint Count
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Physician Assessed Tender Joint Count
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Anxiety T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Depression T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Fatigue T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Pain Intensity
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Pain Interference T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Social Role Satisfaction T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS Cognitive Function T-Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in PROMIS-29 Short Form Score - Physical Function T-score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Improvement in the Maximum Daily NRS-Pain Score at Day 84
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants as Responders Using the SLE Responder Index (SRI)
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had 100% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Study Product
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Increased Scores From Baseline on ARCI-M
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence of Arthritis in SELENA-SLEDAI
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 75% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits Score
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of Treatment Emergent Events With Elevated Liver Tests
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of Treatment Emergent Intolerability Events
NCT03093402 (38) [back to overview]Number of Treatment Emergent QTc Prolongation Events
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx) Rate Over 28 Weeks
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]Time to First New Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx)
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]FEV1 % Predicted
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx)
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]CFQ-R Respiratory Symptom Domain
NCT03451045 (6) [back to overview]Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx) Rate

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events.

(NCT02465450)
Timeframe: 84 days of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
JBT101 1 mg QD14
JBT-101 5 mg QD13
Placebo QD15
JBT-101 20 mg QD21
JBT-101 20 mg BID19
Placebo BID14

[back to top]

JBT-101 (Lenabasum) Plasma Concentrations on Day 84

Plasma concentrations were reported for the lenabasum 20 mg QD, 20 mg BID, and placebo groups only, at Day 84. (NCT02465450)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Lenabasum 20 mg QD249.77
Lenabasum 20 mg BID360.80
Placebo BID0.00

[back to top]

Change in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) From Baseline in Part A.

The CDASI is a validated outcome measure that systematically quantifies cutaneous DM disease activity, In the CDASI, DM skin disease activity is scored from 0 to 100 based on the physician's evaluation of erythema, scale, and erosion or ulceration at 15 anatomic locations as well as alopecia, Gottron's sign or papules on the hands, and periungual changes. A 5-point or greater decrease in the CDASI activity score indicates clinically relevant improvement based on statistical analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve to maximize sensitivity and specificity (NCT02466243)
Timeframe: Part A: 84-day treatment period (Change from the Baseline CDSAI score at Day 84)

InterventionCDASI Activity Score (Least Squares Mean)
Lenabasum-8.0
Placebo-5.5

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Outcomes From Baseline at 84 Days for Part A

"LS mean (SE) change from baseline to Week 6 (Day 84) for lenabasum vs. placebo using a mixed model repeated measures analysis~The CDASI is a validated outcome measure that systematically quantifies cutaneous DM disease activity and damage, In the CDASI, the Damage Score is scored from 0 to 32 based on the physician's evaluation of poikiloderma and calcinosis. 0 representing no damage and 32 representing the greatest level of damage." (NCT02466243)
Timeframe: Part A: 84-day treatment period

InterventionCDASI Damage Score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.5
Lenabasum 20 mg BID-8.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Indicating Clinical Benefit in Treatment Satisfaction

"At the end of treatment, the participant and their physician will complete separately a survey asking what treatment assignment they believe they received (e.g., JBT-101, placebo, or cannot tell), whether the participant received benefit from their assigned treatment and whether the participant or their physician would choose the treatment received.~The percentage of participants who responded that they received clinical benefit from the experimental drug treatment at the end of treatment will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg59.1
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo76.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg69.6
Placebo52.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Arthritis in BILAG-2004

The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems. The severity of arthritis at baseline will be determine by the highest arthritis severity level where arthritis is indicated as improving, same, new or worse* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004. The percentage of participants who met the criteria for improvement of arthritis in the BILAG-2004 Musculoskeletal assessments (using the mild, moderate and severe arthritis questions on the assessment) at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg50.0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo56.5
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg78.2
Placebo58.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Physicians Indicating Participant Clinical Benefit in Treatment Satisfaction

"At the end of treatment, the participant and their physician will complete separately a survey asking what treatment assignment they believe they received (e.g., JBT-101, placebo, or cannot tell), whether the participant received benefit from their assigned treatment and whether the participant or their physician would choose the treatment received.~The percentage of physicians who responded that the participant received clinical benefit from the experimental drug treatment at the end of treatment will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Physicians (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg43.5
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo60.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg65.2
Placebo66.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity - SELENA-SLEDAI Score

"The change from baseline in the SELENA-SLEDAI score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed.~The Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) is a validated tool for assessing SLE disease activity. The SLEDAI is a one page assessment that contains 24 items scored as present or absent. Each item is assigned a weighted score which is summed to calculate the overall SLEDAI score. SLEDAI score ranges from 0-105 points. Higher scores represent more disease activity, with a score of 6 being considered clinically important and may impact the decision to treat." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg6.96.15.44.7
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg7.56.05.04.5
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo7.05.54.54.5
Placebo8.26.66.15.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004 Score

"For each of the nine domains, a numerical score will be assigned based on the BILAG score as follows: A=12, B=8, C=1 and D/E=0. A single numerical BILAG total score will be calculated for each participant visit as the summation of the numerical scores for each of the nine domains. The BILAG total score can range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. The change from baseline in the total BILAG-2004 score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.~* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg12.28.87.98.6
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg11.56.25.44.9
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo9.75.86.55.1
Placebo13.15.58.17.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity -Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score

The change from baseline in the total PGA score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. The PGA utilizes a 0 to 3 visual analogue scale for assessing disease activity in SLE that is anchored by the verbal descriptors as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. An increase of >=0.3 points is considered worsening of the PGA. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg1.21.21.00.9
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg1.41.00.90.7
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo1.20.90.80.8
Placebo1.31.11.00.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lupus Disease Activity- Patient Global Assessment Score

"The change from baseline in the total Patient Global Assessment score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. The total Patient Global Assessment is performed with a visual analogue scale (0 to 100) in which the participant is asked to indicate how active she/he thinks their disease is. The visual analogue scale is anchored by two descriptors: not active (score of 0) and extremely active (score of 100)." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg60.248.148.337.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg65.647.550.248.7
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo67.049.250.548.0
Placebo65.554.459.458.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Physician Assessed Swollen Joint Count

The change from baseline in the number of swollen joints identified by the physician in the Physician Joint Exam at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. The number of swollen joints can range from 0 to 66 joints. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Baseline, (Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Swollen Joints (Mean)
Baseline/ Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg5.45.63.43.3
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg6.84.52.32.1
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo7.64.03.03.1
Placebo9.05.35.14.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Physician Assessed Tender Joint Count

The change from baseline in the number of tender joints identified by the physician in the Physician Joint Exam at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. The number of tender joints can range from 0 to 68 joints. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Baseline, (Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment

,,,
InterventionNumber of Tender Joints (Mean)
Baseline/ Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg14.112.19.510.3
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg13.18.85.04.7
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo15.012.312.311.9
Placebo18.410.010.711.3

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Anxiety T-Score

"The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Anxiety T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure.~The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomology for the Anxiety domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Anxiety Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionT-Score (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg57.054.755.752.9
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg56.954.156.054.7
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo52.453.252.650.0
Placebo55.151.653.453.5

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Depression T-Score

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Depression T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomology for the Depression domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Depression Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg57.753.852.953.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg52.749.851.850.0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo49.649.149.750.0
Placebo52.152.051.150.6

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Fatigue T-Score

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Fatigue T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomology for the Fatigue domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Fatigue Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionT-Score (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg64.061.861.759.7
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg63.158.055.857.9
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo62.459.657.856.7
Placebo63.760.159.459.0

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Pain Intensity

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Pain Intensity will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The Pain Intensity on the PROMIS is a single item numerical rating scale where the respondent selects a whole number representing the average pain of the past 7 days ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The change from baseline in PROMIS Pain Intensity Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/ Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg6.65.55.24.7
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg7.05.24.94.6
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo6.95.35.15.2
Placebo6.95.85.85.8

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Pain Interference T-Score

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Pain Interference T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomology for the Pain Interference domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Pain Interference Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg64.961.661.158.5
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg65.060.457.760.0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo64.761.658.560.4
Placebo66.161.262.061.1

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance T-Score

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Sleep Disturbance T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents worse symptomology for the Sleep Disturbance domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg58.656.656.055.4
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg57.957.756.456.3
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo56.454.553.756.4
Placebo62.657.257.757.2

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS - Social Role Satisfaction T-Score

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Social Role Satisfaction T-Score will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score better functioning for the Social Role Satisfaction domain. The change from baseline in PROMIS Social Role Satisfaction Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg42.244.944.246.1
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg44.345.147.047.8
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo42.544.947.148.2
Placebo42.447.345.946.8

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS Cognitive Function T-Score

"The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank version 2.0 - Cognitive Function scale will be used to assess trends over time in this health measure. The raw score is calculated for and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better cognitive function.~The change from baseline in PROMIS Cognitive Function Score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionT-Score (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg45.543.644.745.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg42.345.445.645.8
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo45.148.347.148.1
Placebo42.445.443.444.2

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in PROMIS-29 Short Form Score - Physical Function T-score

"The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Short Form (Version 2.0) will be used to assess trends over time in this state of health measure. The PROMIS-29 consists of 7 domains related to physical, mental and social health. Raw scores are calculated for each domain and translated into a T-score per the PROMIS-29 scoring guide. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents better functioning for the Physical Function domain.~The change from baseline in the PROMIS-29 Physical Function T-score at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85)." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionT-Score (Mean)
Baseline/Day 1Day 29Day 57Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg37.738.539.939.8
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg39.242.142.241.5
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo39.239.840.041.1
Placebo38.540.540.440.3

[back to top]

Improvement in the Maximum Daily NRS-Pain Score at Day 84

"The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.~Participants will be asked to report their maximum daily pain using the NRS-Pain. Participants will call into an interactive voice response e diary system (IVRS) and record the number that best reflects their maximum amount of pain experienced in the last 24 hours. Participants will be asked to call at the same time each day, preferably before bedtime.~Longitudinal trends over the course of the treatment period will be modeled and used to estimate difference between means at baseline and Day 84 for each treatment group." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 84

,,,
InterventionNRS Pain Score (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 84
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg6.35.1
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg6.05.1
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo6.44.9
Placebo6.25.9

[back to top]

Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares

"The number of BILAG-2004 disease flares as defined as one new BILAG A or two new BILAG B scores will be assessed.~The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.~* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 29)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
One new BILAG A FlareTwo new BILAG B Flares
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg00
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg00
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo01
Placebo00

[back to top]

Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares

"The number of BILAG-2004 disease flares as defined as one new BILAG A or two new BILAG B scores will be assessed.~The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.~* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (Day 57)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
One new BILAG A FlareTwo new BILAG B Flares
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg00
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg01
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo00
Placebo10

[back to top]

Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares

"The number of BILAG-2004 disease flares as defined as one new BILAG A or two new BILAG B scores will be assessed.~The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.~* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (Day 85)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
One new BILAG A FlareTwo new BILAG B Flares
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg20
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg00
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo00
Placebo10

[back to top]

Number of BILAG-2004 Disease Flares

"The number of BILAG-2004 disease flares as defined as one new BILAG A or two new BILAG B scores will be assessed.~The BILAG-2004* is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity. The BILAG-2004 includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.~* BILAG-2004: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
One new BILAG A FlareTwo new BILAG B Flares
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg01
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg10
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo00
Placebo00

[back to top]

Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)

"The number of mild/moderate and severe disease flares will be assessed using the SFI instrument to define disease flare(s) and severity.~The SELENA SLEDAI Flare Index categorizes disease flares as mild/moderate or severe, based on the highest categories of clinical features recorded or by treatment recommendations by the physician." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 29)

,,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
SevereMild/ModerateNo Flare
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg1416
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg1023
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo1222
Placebo0322

[back to top]

Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)

"The number of mild/moderate and severe disease flares will be assessed using the SFI instrument to define disease flare(s) and severity.~The SELENA SLEDAI Flare Index categorizes disease flares as mild/moderate or severe, based on the highest categories of clinical features recorded or by treatment recommendations by the physician." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (Day 57)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SevereMild/ModerateNo Flare
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg1217
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg0321
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo0320
Placebo0717

[back to top]

Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)

"The number of mild/moderate and severe disease flares will be assessed using the SFI instrument to define disease flare(s) and severity.~The SELENA SLEDAI Flare Index categorizes disease flares as mild/moderate or severe, based on the highest categories of clinical features recorded or by treatment recommendations by the physician." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (Day 85)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SevereMild/ModerateNo Flare
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg0317
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg2219
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo1418
Placebo1419

[back to top]

Number of SLE Disease Flares by Severity Using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI)

The number of mild/moderate and severe disease flares will be assessed using the SFI instrument to define disease flare(s) and severity. The SELENA SLEDAI Flare Index categorizes disease flares as mild/moderate or severe, based on the highest categories of clinical features recorded or by treatment recommendations by the physician. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SevereMild/ModerateNo Flare
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg0713
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg0914
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo0518
Placebo2913

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants as Responders Using the SLE Responder Index (SRI)

The SRI is a validated SLE disease activity instrument used to detect clinically meaningful improvement of disease in SLE clinical trials. The SRI is a composite instrument comprised of the SELENA-SLE Disease Activity Index [SELENA-SLEDAI], Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004. A responder is defined as having at least a 4 point reduction in the SELENA-SLEDAI score, no new BILAG A or no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, and no increase in the PGA of 0.3 points or more. The percentage of participants who met the criteria for a responder in the SRI at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg19.040.050.021.1
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg25.041.754.533.3
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo28.034.839.134.8
Placebo20.033.339.129.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had 100% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits

"The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.~The percent change from baseline in the 7-day average of the maximum NRS-Pain scores prior to study Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg0000
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg004.50
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo04.34.80
Placebo0000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits

"The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.~The percent change from baseline in the 7-day average of the maximum NRS-Pain scores prior to study Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg19.038.942.136.4
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg30.440.940.946.7
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo33.347.842.931.3
Placebo20.026.127.327.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits

"The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.~The percent change from baseline in the 7-day average of the maximum NRS-Pain scores prior to study Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg14.316.726.39.1
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg17.418.222.720.0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo16.713.023.812.5
Placebo8.013.04.50

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Increased Scores From Baseline on ARCI-M

"The percentage of participants who experienced ≥1 score increase on the ARCI-M from the Visit 1 (Day 1) pre-dose assessment at Visit 1 (Day 1) post-dose, Visit 3 (Day 29) and Visit 5 (Day 85) will be assessed.~The ARCI-M questionnaire was completed by subjects at Visit1 (Day 1) pre- and post-dosing, Visit 3 (Day 29) and Visit 5 (Day 85). This is a 12-item true/false questionnaire developed by the National Institutes of Drug Abuse, designed to detect the full range of subjective responses experienced by marijuana users. An answer of true has an assigned value of 1 and an answer of false has an assigned value of 0. The ARCI-M score was computed as the sum of the assigned values for all 12 questions and can range from 0 to 12. If a question is missed, the score is not calculated." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1-prior to treatment initiation), Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1-post-treatment initiation) Visit 3 (Day 29) and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 1 Post-DoseDay 29Day 85
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg25.045.011.1
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg20.829.227.3
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo11.137.539.1
Placebo4.036.056.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Arthritis in SELENA-SLEDAI

"The Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) is a validated tool for assessing SLE disease activity.~The percentage of participants with arthritis indicated as Present on the SELENA SLEDAI at Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. [A single question on the SELENA SLEDAI with a response of Present or Absent was assessed.]" (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg14.330.045.015.0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg20.845.847.834.8
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo28.039.139.139.1
Placebo16.025.033.325.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least 75% Improvement From Baseline in the 7-day Average of the Maximum NRS-Pain Score Prior to Study Visits Score

"The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.~The percent change from baseline in the 7-day average of the maximum NRS-Pain scores prior to study Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed." (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 113)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg011.15.30
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg8.74.59.10
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo4.28.74.812.5
Placebo4.04.300

[back to top]

Number of Treatment Emergent Events With Elevated Liver Tests

The number of participants with elevated liver tests, defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 3 x upper limit of normal and total bilirubin > 1.5 x the upper limit of normal, present on repeat testing, at Visit 3 (Day 29), Visit 4 (Day 57), Visit 5 (Day 85) and Visit 6 (Day 113) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Visit 6 (Day 113)

InterventionNumber of Events (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Treatment Emergent Intolerability Events

The number of intolerability events of the study drug, defined as incidence of discontinuation of study product due to TEAEs at least possibly related to study product from Visits 1 (Day 1) through 5 (Day 85) will be assessed. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Day 1 after initiation of study intervention through Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

InterventionNumber of Events (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg6
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo4
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Treatment Emergent QTc Prolongation Events

The number of treatment emergent QTc prolongation events will be identified when QTc prolongation > 500 msec total duration and when the change from Visit 1 (Day 1) QTc interval prior to study drug administration > 60 msec Twelve-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate at Screening and Visits 1 (Day 1) and 5 (Day 85). The ECGs were evaluated for medically significant abnormalities and QT/QTc intervals. The QT/QTc intervals were measured at Visit 1 (Day 1) before administration and between 2.5 and 3.5 hours after administration of study product in the clinic, at the time of maximum JBT-101 concentration in the blood. (NCT03093402)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 1) and Visit 5 (Day 85 - Last Day of Treatment)

InterventionNumber of Events (Number)
High: JBT-101 20mg/20mg0
Medium: JBT-101 20mg/Placebo0
Low: JBT-101 5mg/5mg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx) Rate Over 28 Weeks

Rate of PEx using the primary PEx definition with lenabasum 20 mg BID compared to placebo, during the treatment period. An primary PEx is defined on the physician's decision to treat with oral, intraveneous or inhaled antibiotics in the presence 4/12 Fuch's criteria (Change in sputum, new/increased hemoptysis, increased cough, increased dyspnea, malaise, fatigue/lethargy, Temperature greater than 38C, weight loss, sinus pain, change in sinus discharge, change in exam of chest, decrease in FEV1 of more than 10%, radiographic change). This excludes prophylactic antibiotics. A new PEx is a one that occurs at 28 days after the previous PEx. (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventionevents per participant/28 weeks (Number)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID0.911
Lenabasum 5 mg BID0.749
Placebo BID0.842

[back to top]

Time to First New Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx)

Time to first new PEx using the primary PEx definition with lenabasum 20 mg BID compared to placebo. An primary PEx is defined on the physician's decision to treat with oral, intraveneous or inhaled antibiotics in the presence 4/12 Fuch's criteria (Change in sputum, new/increased hemoptysis, increased cough, increased dyspnea, malaise, fatigue/lethargy, Temperature greater than 38C, weight loss, sinus pain, change in sinus discharge, change in exam of chest, decrease in FEV1 of more than 10%, radiographic change). This excludes prophylactic antibiotics. A new PEx is a one that occurs at 28 days after the previous PEx. The rate is calculate over a 28 week period from visit 1 to week 28 visit (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventiondays (Median)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID162
Lenabasum 5 mg BID148
Placebo143

[back to top]

FEV1 % Predicted

Change from baseline to week 28 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) expressed as a percentage of a normal range. A lower percentage FEV1 is indicative of decrease in lung functionality. The changes observed from baseline to week 28 for lenabasum will be compared with those observed for placebo treated participants. (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Change from Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventionpercentage of Predicted FEV1 (Least Squares Mean)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID0.014
Lenabasum 5 mg BID-0.005
Placebo-0.012

[back to top]

Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx)

Time to first PEx using the secondary PEx definition with lenabasum 20 mg BID compared to placebo. The secondary definition of a PEx is based on the physician's diagnosis of pulmonary exacerbation and commencement of new oral, intravenous, or inhaled antibiotics. A new PEx is defined one that starts 28 or more days after the previous confirmed PEx. (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventiondays (Median)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID116
Lenabasum 5 mg BID113
Placebo120

[back to top]

CFQ-R Respiratory Symptom Domain

Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised measures change from baseline in CFQ-R respiratory symptom domain with lenabasum compared to placebo. Subjects >/= 14 years of age. 5 distinct 4-point Likert scales (e.g., always/often/ sometime/never) Scores for each HRQoL domain; after recoding, each item is summed to generate a domain score and standardized. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Change from Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID1.16
Lenabasum 5 mg BID-2.92
Placebo-0.96

[back to top]

Pulmonary Exacerbation (PEx) Rate

Event rate of PEx using the secondary PEx definition with lenabasum 20 mg BID compared to placebo. The secondary definition of a PEx is based on the physician's diagnosis of pulmonary exacerbation and commencement of new oral, intravenous, or inhaled antibiotics. A new PEx is defined one that starts 28 or more days after the previous confirmed PEx. The PEx rate is calculated as the number of PEx/28 weeks (NCT03451045)
Timeframe: 28 weeks (Baseline Day 0 to Week 28)

Interventionevents per participant/28 weeks (Number)
Lenabasum 20 mg BID1.08
Lenabasum 5 mg BID0.91
Placebo1.03

[back to top]