Page last updated: 2024-11-12

eluxadoline

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID11250029
CHEMBL ID2159122
CHEBI ID85980
SCHEMBL ID12971682
SCHEMBL ID17950908
MeSH IDM0588002

Synonyms (55)

Synonym
chebi:85980 ,
unii-45tpj4mbq1
eluxadoline ,
jnj-27018966
viberzi
dea no. 9725
jnj 27018966
eluxadoline [usan:inn]
864821-90-9
truberzi
benzoic acid, 5-((((2s)-2-amino-3-(4-(aminocarbonyl)-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-1-oxopropyl)((1s)-1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)amino)methyl)-2-methoxy-
45tpj4mbq1 ,
chembl2159122 ,
eluxadoline (usan)
viberzi (tn)
D10403
eluxadoline [orange book]
5-((2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n-(1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)propanamido)methyl)-2-methoxybenzoic acid
5-((((2s)-2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)propanoyl)((1s)-1-(4-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)amino(methyl)-2-methoxybenzoic acid
eluxadoline [nflis-drug]
eluxadoline [mi]
eluxadoline [who-dd]
eluxadoline [usan]
eluxadoline [inn]
5-[[[(2s)-2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)propanoyl]-[(1s)-1-(4-phenyl-3h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]-2-methoxybenzoic acid
gtpl7691
CS-3855
DTXSID70235589 ,
5-({(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethyl-l-phenylalanyl)[(1s)-1-(4-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl]amino}methyl)-2-methoxybenzoic acid
SCHEMBL12971682
HY-12247
AC-30329
DB09272
5-(((s)-2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n-((s)-1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)propanamido)methyl)-2-methoxybenzoic acid
jnj27018966
EX-A1169
SCHEMBL17950908
mfcd28386164
NCGC00485958-01
AKOS030632800
FT-0701295
AS-35135
Q20539232
benzoic acid, 5-[[[(2s)-2-amino-3-[4-(aminocarbonyl)-2,6-dimethylphenyl]-1-oxopropyl][(1s)-1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]-2-methoxy-
AMY39829
CCG-270093
864821-90-9 (free base)
5-[[[(2s)-2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)propanoyl]-[(1s)-1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]-2-methoxybenzoic acid
eluxadolina
a07da06
eluxadoline (nflis-drug)
dtxcid50158080
5-(((4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethyl-l-phenylalanyl)((1s)-1-(4-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)amino)methyl)-2-methoxybenzoic acid
eluxadolinum
5-{[(2s)-2-amino-3-(4-carbamoyl-2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n-[(1s)-1-(5-phenyl-1h-imidazol-2-yl)ethyl]propanamido]methyl}-2-methoxybenzoic acid

Research Excerpts

Overview

Eluxadoline is a novel medication that was approved in the USA in 2015 for the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) It is a gut-targeting μ and κ opioid receptor agonist and a δ opioid receptor antagonist.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eluxadoline is a mixed μ-opioid, κ-opioid receptor agonist, and δ-opioid receptor antagonist, approved in the United States for adults with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. "( An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Eluxadoline on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam in Healthy Participants.
Boinpally, R; Kaczynski, E; McGeeney, D; Weissman, D, 2022
)
2.42
"Eluxadoline is a novel medication that was approved in the USA in 2015 for the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. "( Eluxadoline-induced pancreatitis occurring in an adult man without a prior cholecystectomy.
Groff, A; Jain, R; Packard, E; Shahid, Z, 2019
)
3.4
"Eluxadoline is a novel, locally acting mixed μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of adults with IBS-D."( Update on Eluxadoline for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea: Patient Selection and Perspectives.
Liu, R; Staller, K, 2020
)
1.68
"Eluxadoline is a novel drug approved for the management of diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). "( Eluxadoline in the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Özdener, AE; Rivkin, A, 2017
)
3.34
"Eluxadoline is a gut-targeting μ and κ opioid receptor agonist and a δ opioid receptor antagonist."( Update on the Management of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Focus on Rifaximin and Eluxadoline.
Rivkin, A; Rybalov, S, 2016
)
1.37
"Eluxadoline is a mixed μ-opioid receptor (OR) and κ-OR agonist and δ-OR antagonist, approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). "( Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.
Cash, BD; Covington, PS; Dove, LS; Lacy, BE; Schoenfeld, PS, 2017
)
2.3
"Eluxadoline is a locally acting mixed μ-opiod and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist."( Eluxadoline Demonstrates a Lack of Abuse Potential in Phase 2 and 3 Studies of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea.
Cash, BD; Covington, PS; Dove, LS; Fant, RV; Henningfield, JE, 2017
)
2.62

Effects

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eluxadoline has been approved in the US, and submissions to other global authorities are being contemplated or planned."( Eluxadoline: First Global Approval.
Garnock-Jones, KP, 2015
)
2.58

Toxicity

Eluxadoline appears safe and effective for treating IBS-D symptoms in patients with an intact gallbladder reporting inadequate relief with prior loperamide use. Consistent with the known adverse effects of opioid agonists, clinically apparent SOS events were observed in eluxadoline-treated patients.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Adverse events (AEs) were assessed, with special focus on opioid-related AEs, including suspected sphincter of Oddi spasm (SOS) events."( Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.
Cash, BD; Covington, PS; Dove, LS; Lacy, BE; Schoenfeld, PS, 2017
)
0.86
" Consistent with the known adverse effects of opioid agonists, clinically apparent SOS events were observed in eluxadoline-treated patients."( Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.
Cash, BD; Covington, PS; Dove, LS; Lacy, BE; Schoenfeld, PS, 2017
)
1.07
" Incidence of adverse events during alosetron use was not remarkable and was similar to that previously reported."( Alosetron versus traditional pharmacotherapy in clinical practice: effects on resource use, health-related quality of life, safety and symptom improvement in women with severe diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Chey, WD; Chuang, E; Earnest, DL; Olden, KW; Paul Nicandro, J; Shringarpure, R, 2019
)
0.51
" Rates of adverse events were comparable in both groups (37."( Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study.
Brenner, DM; Cash, BD; Elmes, SJR; Gutman, CR; Jo, E; Liu, LWC; Sayuk, GS, 2019
)
0.82
"Eluxadoline appears safe and effective for treating IBS-D symptoms in patients with an intact gallbladder reporting inadequate relief with prior loperamide use."( Efficacy and Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Who Report Inadequate Symptom Control With Loperamide: RELIEF Phase 4 Study.
Brenner, DM; Cash, BD; Elmes, SJR; Gutman, CR; Jo, E; Liu, LWC; Sayuk, GS, 2019
)
2.27
" There were no deaths, serious treatment-emergent adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events during the study."( Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea With or Without Bile Acid Diarrhea: Open-Label Study.
Boinpally, R; Breen-Lyles, M; Busciglio, I; Camilleri, M; Carrothers, TJ; Maselli, D; Muslin, A; Nord, SL; Vijayvargiya, P, 2022
)
1.03
"Eluxadoline is similarly efficacious in the treatment of IBS-D and BAD, and it appears to be safe and efficacious as documented in large clinical trials."( Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea With or Without Bile Acid Diarrhea: Open-Label Study.
Boinpally, R; Breen-Lyles, M; Busciglio, I; Camilleri, M; Carrothers, TJ; Maselli, D; Muslin, A; Nord, SL; Vijayvargiya, P, 2022
)
2.47

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The method was applied successfully to a clinical pharmacokinetic study in six healthy South Indian male subjects under fed conditions and the results were authenticated by incurred sample reanalysis."( High sensitive LC-MS/MS method for estimation of eluxadoline in human plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic study.
Dodda, S; Kandhagatla, RN; Makula, A; Polagani, SR, 2019
)
0.77
" Primary outcome measures were pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam and 1-hydroxy-midazolam."( An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Eluxadoline on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam in Healthy Participants.
Boinpally, R; Kaczynski, E; McGeeney, D; Weissman, D, 2022
)
0.98

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Furthermore, compared to loperamide, which is used to treat non-specific diarrhea, the effects of eluxadoline on GI transit occur over a wider dosage range."( Molecular characterization of eluxadoline as a potential ligand targeting mu-delta opioid receptor heteromers.
Devi, LA; Dove, LS; Fujita, W; Gomes, I; McIntyre, G; Prohaska, D, 2014
)
0.91
" To date only a few opioid receptor modulators are currently in use for the treatment of IBS but with dosage limitations due to the early development of severe constipation."( Eluxadoline for the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Abenavoli, L; Gasbarrini, A; Ianiro, G; Laterza, L; Scarpellini, E; Tack, J, 2016
)
1.88
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
mu-opioid receptor agonistA compound that exhibits agonist activity at the mu-opioid receptor.
delta-opioid receptor antagonistAny compound that exhibits antagonist activity at the delta-opioid receptor.
kappa-opioid receptor agonistA compound that exhibits agonist activity at the kappa-opioid receptor.
gastrointestinal drugA drug used for its effects on the gastrointestinal system, e.g. controlling gastric acidity, regulating gastrointestinal motility and water flow, and improving digestion.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (5)

ClassDescription
imidazolesA five-membered organic heterocycle containing two nitrogen atoms at positions 1 and 3, or any of its derivatives; compounds containing an imidazole skeleton.
methoxybenzoic acidAny benzoic acid carrying one or more methoxy substituents.
benzamides
L-phenylalanine derivativeA proteinogenic amino acid derivative resulting from reaction of L-phenylalanine at the amino group or the carboxy group, or from the replacement of any hydrogen of L-phenylalanine by a heteroatom.
amino acid amideAn amide of an amino acid formed formally by conversion of the carboxy group to a carboxamido group.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (6)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.05500.00011.41629.9000AID696092
Delta-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00130.00000.60689.2330AID696086
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00090.00000.38458.6000AID696087
Kappa-type opioid receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki0.05500.00000.20186.4240AID696092
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Mu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00100.00000.32639.4000AID696089
Delta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)10.00000.00000.43328.3000AID696088
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (50)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
calcitriol biosynthetic process from calciolCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perceptionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neurogenesisMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Wnt protein secretionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to morphineMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular response to stressMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of NMDA receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
immune responseDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adult locomotory behaviorDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein-containing complex assemblyDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane potentialDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transportDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to growth factor stimulusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to toxic substanceDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (33)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
quinine 3-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 23-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D 24-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 2-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-endorphin receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
morphine receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein beta-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor serine/threonine kinase bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled enkephalin receptor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (19)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endosomeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesicle membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axon terminusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spine apparatusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (16)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID696092Binding affinity to guinea pig kappa opioid receptor2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696086Binding affinity to rat delta opioid receptor2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696091Antagonist activity at delta opioid receptor in hamster vas deferens tissue2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696093Agonist activity at kappa opioid receptor guinea pig colon tissue2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696087Binding affinity to rat mu opioid receptor2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696089Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor expressed in CHO-hg cells by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696088Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor expressed in CHO-hg cells by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID696090Antagonist activity at delta opioid receptor expressed in CHO-hg cells assessed as inhibition of SNC-80-induced [35S]-GTPgammaS binding2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID1346364Human mu receptor (Opioid receptors)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID1346400Rat mu receptor (Opioid receptors)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
AID1346406Rat delta receptor (Opioid receptors)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 22, Issue:14
Identification of a dual δ OR antagonist/μ OR agonist as a potential therapeutic for diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (73)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's59 (80.82)24.3611
2020's14 (19.18)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 66.40

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index66.40 (24.57)
Research Supply Index4.47 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.54 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index128.05 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.30 (0.95)

This Compound (66.40)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials11 (14.67%)5.53%
Reviews22 (29.33%)6.00%
Case Studies3 (4.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other39 (52.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (9)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Cross Over Study to Investigate the Effectiveness and Safety of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Diabetic Diarrhea [NCT04313088]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to This study did not enroll any subjects)
A Phase 4 Multicenter, Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) in Patients Who Report Inadequate C [NCT02959983]Phase 4346 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-25Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Pediatric Participants (Age 6 to 17 Years) With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) [NCT03339128]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-15Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose Ranging, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-27018966 in the Treatment of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea [NCT01130272]Phase 2807 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-28Completed
3030-401-002: An Open-Label Pilot Study of Eluxadoline in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) Who Have Evidence of Bile Acid Malabsorption (BAM) [NCT03441581]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-23Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-27018966 in the Treatment of Patients With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome [NCT01553747]Phase 31,146 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-27018966 in the Treatment of Patients With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome [NCT01553591]Phase 31,282 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-29Completed
Treatment of Diarrhea-Associated Fecal Incontinence With Eluxadoline [NCT03489265]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficult to recruit severely affected patients with fecal incontinence)
A Phase 3, Long-term Safety Study of Oral Eluxadoline Administered to Pediatric Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) [NCT04880876]Phase 3124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-13Enrolling by invitation
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Pain Scores
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores at Week 12
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores at Week 4
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Daily Bowel Movements
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly BSS Scores
NCT01130272 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Participants Achieving Prespecified Improvement in Symptoms for at Least 50% of the Time
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Incontinence Episodes
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]IBS-QoL Total Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IBS-QoL Total Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) Scale
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders to the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Measure (IBS-QoL) Scale
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea Predominant (IBS-d) Global Symptom Scale by Intervals
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Daily Stool Consistency Scores by Intervals
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Pain Responders In Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores by Intervals
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Number of Urgency Episodes Per Day
NCT01553591 (15) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Movements Per Day
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Number of Urgency Episodes Per Day
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Pain Responders In Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores by Intervals
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Daily Stool Consistency Scores by Intervals
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea Predominant (IBS-d) Global Symptom Scale by Intervals
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders to the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Measure (IBS-QoL) Scale
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) Scale
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Movements Per Day
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IBS-QoL Total Scores
NCT01553747 (14) [back to overview]Number of Bowel Incontinence Episodes
NCT02959983 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Monthly Composite Responders
NCT02959983 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Responders
NCT02959983 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Stool Consistency Responders
NCT02959983 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]AUC: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During the Dosing Interval for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]CL/F: Apparent Total Clearance of the Drug From Plasma After Oral Administration for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Concentration for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Cmin: Minimum Concentration for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) Score Over 4 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores During the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Bowel Movement Frequency During the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Bloating Scores During the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average Number of Daily Urgent Bowel Movements During the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) Total Score at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (7αC4) Levels at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Vc/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Cmax for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]t1/2: Half-Life for Eluxadoline
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Fecal Incontinence During the Treatment Period
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Potentially Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Potentially Clinically Significant Change in Laboratory Tests
NCT03441581 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in General Physical Condition as Measured Through General Physical Exam

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Pain Scores

The participant recorded their worst daily pain score in a diary using an 11-point scale where: 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. The daily scores over the previous week were averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week Prior to Randomization) to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 12
Eluxadoline 100 mg6.11-2.33-2.81-3.25
Eluxadoline 200 mg5.78-2.20-2.58-2.96
Eluxadoline 25 mg5.91-2.11-2.54-2.57
Eluxadoline 5 mg5.75-1.76-2.35-2.50
Placebo5.87-2.09-2.54-2.65

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores at Week 12

Composite responders were defined as participants who completed at least 5 out of 7 days with diary entries during the interval of interest and met both of the following criteria: 1) Average daily pain response scores over the past week improved by ≥30% and at least 2 points as compared with the baseline average pain score (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization), 2) Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score of 3 or 4 on 66% of reported days in the past week. The participant recorded their abdominal pain in a daily diary using an 11-point scale where: 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. The participant recorded stool consistency in a daily diary using the BSS 7-point scale where: 1=separate hard lumps, 2=sausage shaped but lumpy, 3=sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4=sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5=soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6=fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7=watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week prior to Randomization) to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 5 mg8.6
Eluxadoline 25 mg13.2
Eluxadoline 100 mg20.2
Eluxadoline 200 mg15.0
Placebo11.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores at Week 4

Composite responders were defined as participants who completed at least 5 out of 7 days with diary entries during the interval of interest and met both of the following criteria: 1) Average daily pain response scores over the past week improved by ≥30% and at least 2 points as compared with the baseline average pain score (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization), 2) Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score of 3 or 4 on 66% of reported days in the past week. Abdominal pain was assessed on an 11-point scale where: 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Stool consistency was assessed using the BSS 7-point scale where: 1=separate hard lumps, 2=sausage shaped but lumpy, 3=sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4=sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5=soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6=fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7=watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week prior to Randomization) to Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 5 mg12.4
Eluxadoline 25 mg12.0
Eluxadoline 100 mg11.0
Eluxadoline 200 mg13.8
Placebo5.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Daily Bowel Movements

Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary at the same time each day. The number of daily bowel movements over the previous week were averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week prior to Randomization) to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,,
Interventionbowel movements per day (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 12
Eluxadoline 100 mg5.13-1.71-1.85-2.13
Eluxadoline 200 mg4.99-2.03-2.20-2.29
Eluxadoline 25 mg4.43-1.19-1.31-1.38
Eluxadoline 5 mg4.55-1.14-1.40-1.59
Placebo4.91-1.39-1.65-1.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly BSS Scores

The patient recorded stool consistency in a daily diary using the BSS 7-point scale where: 1=hard stool to 7=watery diarrhea. The daily scores over the previous week were averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week prior to Randomization) to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 12
Eluxadoline 100 mg6.22-1.48-1.64-1.68
Eluxadoline 200 mg6.23-1.66-1.71-1.89
Eluxadoline 25 mg6.24-1.17-1.39-1.41
Eluxadoline 5 mg6.19-1.09-1.19-1.37
Placebo6.20-0.99-1.19-1.27

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Participants Achieving Prespecified Improvement in Symptoms for at Least 50% of the Time

Responders were participants that met both of the following criteria on the same week for at least 50% of time on study: 1) average of daily pain scores over the past week improved by ≥30% compared with baseline average in pain score, 2) ≥50% reduction in the number of days over the past week with a BSS score ≥5 compared with Baseline. Participants must also have had at least 5/7 days diary entry to be considered a responder for that week. Abdominal pain was assessed on an 11-point scale where a score of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Stool consistency was assessed using the BSS 7-point scale where: 1=separate hard lumps to 7=watery with no solid pieces. Response rates (percentage of participants) are based on model estimates from the logistic regression. (NCT01130272)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week Prior to Randomization) to Weeks 1-12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Weeks 1-12Weeks 1-4Weeks 5-8Weeks 9-12
Eluxadoline 100 mg29.724.943.049.1
Eluxadoline 200 mg30.632.739.350.7
Eluxadoline 25 mg20.221.034.434.4
Eluxadoline 5 mg16.518.029.329.7
Placebo19.020.030.331.0

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Incontinence Episodes

Participants recorded the number of incontinence episodes over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionincontinence episodes (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg0.720.710.58
Eluxadoline 75 mg0.740.630.46
Placebo0.930.940.69

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores

Composite responders were defined as a participant who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries during the interval of interest. A participant must had met both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Daily stool consistency response: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain. Bristol stool scale was defined as 7-point Scale in which a score of 1 = separate hard lumps, 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 = sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 = sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 = soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 = watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Up to 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 75 mg23.9
Eluxadoline 100 mg25.1
Placebo17.1

[back to top]

IBS-QoL Total Scores

The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100- point scale (0=worst; 100=better) for ease of interpretation. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 36, 44, and 52 (EOT)

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Responders at Week 4Responders at Week 8Responders at Week 12Responders at Week 18Responders at Week 26Responders at Week 36Responders at Week 44Responders at Week 52/EOT
Eluxadoline 100 mg64.3467.7368.9370.0571.3472.3772.1571.02
Eluxadoline 75 mg62.3766.2266.8068.7570.7470.5370.3068.85
Placebo57.1359.4661.7263.6064.8366.4765.5963.93

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days

An incontinence free day was one where the participant reports zero incontinence episodes. The number of incontinence free days for a participant was assessed each week based on the number of reported days. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg4.954.794.35
Eluxadoline 75 mg4.834.964.39
Placebo4.634.644.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IBS-QoL Total Scores

The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100- point scale (0=worst; 100=better) for ease of interpretation. A positive change from Baseline indicates that quality of life improved. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 36, 44, and 52/EOT

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 18Change at Week 26Change at Week 36Change at Week 44Change at Week 52/EOT
Eluxadoline 100 mg17.8621.0822.7624.1825.8027.1826.6425.86
Eluxadoline 75 mg16.4919.8820.2623.0925.2825.3725.1323.30
Placebo13.2515.7617.7619.8020.6222.6421.7720.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores

Symptoms of abdominal discomfort were recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no discomfort and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable discomfort. A negative change from Baseline indicates the discomfort decreased. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12Change at Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg-2.41-2.97-3.52
Eluxadoline 75 mg-2.24-2.75-3.27
Placebo-2.01-2.61-3.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores

Symptoms of abdominal bloating were recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no bloating and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable bloating. A negative change from Baseline indicates the bloating decreased. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12Change at Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg-2.03-2.49-2.94
Eluxadoline 75 mg-1.84-2.42-2.76
Placebo-1.72-2.16-2.47

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores

Composite responders were defined as a participant who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries during the interval of interest. A participant must had met both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Daily stool consistency response: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain. Bristol stool scale was defined as 7-point Scale in which a score of 1 = separate hard lumps, 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 = sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 = sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 = soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 = watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Up to 26 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 75 mg23.4
Eluxadoline 100 mg29.3
Placebo19.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) Scale

"Adequate relief of IBS symptoms was assessed once weekly by participants answering the IBS-AR item in the electronic diary. IBS-AR responders were defined as participants with a weekly response of Yes to adequate relief of their IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the total weeks during the interval. A participant must have had a positive response on ≥6 weeks for the 12-week interval and ≥13 weeks for the 26-week interval, regardless of diary compliance, to be a responder." (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12) and 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26
Eluxadoline 100 mg54.249.5
Eluxadoline 75 mg52.945.7
Placebo43.840.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders to the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Measure (IBS-QoL) Scale

IBS-QoL responders were defined as participants who achieved at least a 14-point improvement in IBS-QoL total score from baseline to the applicable visit. The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100-point (0= worst; 100=better) scale for ease of interpretation. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 36, 44, and 52 (End of Treatment [EOT])

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders at Week 4Responders at Week 8Responders at Week 12Responders at Week 18Responders at Week 26Responders at Week 36Responders at Week 44Responders at Week 52/EOT
Eluxadoline 100 mg44.149.848.145.145.143.240.154.9
Eluxadoline 75 mg42.643.844.344.545.441.039.649.4
Placebo37.041.744.043.340.039.637.547.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea Predominant (IBS-d) Global Symptom Scale by Intervals

IBS-d global symptom responders were defined as those participants who met the daily IBS-d global symptom response criteria (ie, IBS-d global symptom score of 0 [none] or 1 [mild]; or a daily IBS-d global symptom score improved by ≥2.0 compared to the baseline average) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. IBS-d Global Symptom Scale was a 5 point scale, score ranging from 0 to 4. 0= no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms, 3= severe symptoms and 4 = very severe symptoms. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over the 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg34.737.131.938.736.635.936.435.2
Eluxadoline 75 mg35.136.332.637.035.635.837.536.8
Placebo28.832.326.932.834.035.433.329.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Daily Stool Consistency Scores by Intervals

Stool consistency responders: participants who met daily stool consistency response criterion (ie,score of 1, 2, 3, or 4 or absence of bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. BSS was defined as 7-point Scale in which score of 1= separate hard lumps, 2= sausage shaped but lumpy, 3= sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4= sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5= soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6= fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7= watery with no solid pieces. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg34.334.031.535.235.232.931.530.3
Eluxadoline 75 mg30.028.128.831.129.027.631.930.2
Placebo22.024.119.024.124.624.423.724.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Pain Responders In Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores by Intervals

Pain responders were defined as participants who met the daily pain response criteria (ie, the worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over the 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg43.246.544.447.245.844.143.242.0
Eluxadoline 75 mg42.445.240.544.544.544.344.744.7
Placebo39.643.337.545.443.845.441.538.4

[back to top]

Number of Urgency Episodes Per Day

Participants recorded the number of urgency episodes over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionepisodes per day (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg1.741.601.45
Eluxadoline 75 mg1.751.551.25
Placebo2.191.811.55

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Movements Per Day

Participants recorded the number of bowel movements over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553591)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionbowel movements per day (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg3.203.092.79
Eluxadoline 75 mg3.203.122.83
Placebo3.723.443.12

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days

An incontinence free day was one where the participant reports zero incontinence episodes. The number of incontinence free days for a participant was assessed each week based on the number of reported days. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg5.465.565.59
Eluxadoline 75 mg5.535.385.53
Placebo5.315.285.29

[back to top]

Number of Urgency Episodes Per Day

Participants recorded the number of urgency episodes over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionepisodes per day (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg1.581.321.12
Eluxadoline 75 mg1.621.371.13
Placebo2.001.731.54

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Pain Responders In Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores by Intervals

Pain responders were defined as participants who met the daily pain response criteria (ie, the worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over the 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg51.050.046.652.950.349.047.446.9
Eluxadoline 75 mg48.047.546.753.048.047.245.141.7
Placebo45.344.841.949.246.943.542.740.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Daily Stool Consistency Scores by Intervals

Stool consistency responders: Participants who met daily stool consistency response criterion (ie,score of 1, 2, 3, or 4 or absence of bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. BSS was defined as 7-point Scale in which score of 1= separate hard lumps, 2= sausage shaped but lumpy, 3= sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4= sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5= soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6= fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7= watery with no solid pieces. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg35.639.837.238.239.341.436.138.2
Eluxadoline 75 mg37.034.434.637.537.536.233.932.5
Placebo20.923.618.123.326.424.924.922.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders In Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea Predominant (IBS-d) Global Symptom Scale by Intervals

IBS-d global symptom responders were defined as those participants who met the daily IBS-d global symptom response criteria (ie, IBS-d global symptom score of 0 [none] or 1 [mild]; or a daily IBS-d global symptom score improved by ≥2.0 compared to the baseline average) for at least 50% of days with diary entries during each interval. IBS-d Global Symptom Scale was a 5-point scale, score ranging from 0 to 4. 0= no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms, 3= severe symptoms and 4 = very severe symptoms. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval, a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval, and a minimum of 110 days of diary entries over the 26-week interval to be a responder. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12), 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26), and 4-week interval (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, and 21-24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26Responders during Weeks 1-4Responders during Weeks 5-8Responders during Weeks 9-12Responders during Weeks 13-16Responders during Weeks 17-20Responders during Weeks 21-24
Eluxadoline 100 mg42.443.236.945.043.542.940.841.6
Eluxadoline 75 mg43.645.140.245.144.943.842.541.7
Placebo29.634.325.735.134.033.033.233.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders to the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Measure (IBS-QoL) Scale

IBS-QoL responders were defined as participants who achieved at least a 14-point improvement in IBS-QoL total score from baseline to the applicable visit. The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100-point (0= worst; 100=better) scale for ease of interpretation. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 26 and 30 (End of Treatment [EOT])

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders at Week 4Responders at Week 8Responders at Week 12Responders at Week 18Responders at Week 26Responders at Week 30 /EOT
Eluxadoline 100 mg45.550.049.545.044.853.9
Eluxadoline 75 mg45.148.848.345.145.454.3
Placebo40.143.745.041.941.452.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) Scale

"Adequate relief of IBS symptoms was assessed once weekly by participants answering the IBS-AR item in the electronic diary. IBS-AR responders were defined as participants with a weekly response of Yes to adequate relief of their IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the total weeks during the interval. A participant must have had a positive response on ≥6 weeks for the 12-week interval and ≥13 weeks for the 26-week interval, regardless of diary compliance, to be a responder." (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: 12-week interval (Weeks 1-12) and 26-week interval (Weeks 1-26)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responders during Weeks 1-12Responders during Weeks 1-26
Eluxadoline 100 mg58.453.7
Eluxadoline 75 mg60.152.8
Placebo49.243.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores

Composite responders were defined as participants who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries during the interval of interest. A participant must had met both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Daily stool consistency response: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain. Bristol stool scale was defined as 7-point Scale in which a score of 1 = separate hard lumps, 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 = sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 = sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 = soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 = watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 75 mg28.9
Eluxadoline 100 mg29.6
Placebo16.2

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Movements Per Day

Participants recorded the number of bowel movements over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionbowel movements per day (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg3.052.802.66
Eluxadoline 75 mg3.032.892.57
Placebo3.383.152.96

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores

Composite responders were defined as participants who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries during the interval of interest. A participant must had met both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Daily stool consistency response: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain. Bristol stool scale was defined as 7-point Scale in which a score of 1 = separate hard lumps, 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 = sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 = sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 = soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 = watery with no solid pieces. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 75 mg30.4
Eluxadoline 100 mg32.7
Placebo20.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores

Symptoms of abdominal bloating were recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no bloating and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable bloating. A negative change from Baseline indicates the bloating decreased. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12Change at Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg-1.80-2.41-2.68
Eluxadoline 75 mg-1.89-2.24-2.38
Placebo-1.73-2.08-2.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores

Symptoms of abdominal discomfort were recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no discomfort and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable discomfort. A negative change from Baseline indicates the discomfort decreased. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12Change at Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg-2.19-2.90-3.16
Eluxadoline 75 mg-2.44-2.88-3.19
Placebo-2.06-2.56-2.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IBS-QoL Total Scores

The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100- point scale (0=worst; 100=better) for ease of interpretation. A positive change from Baseline indicates that quality of life improved. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 26 and 30/EOT

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 18Change at Week 26Change at Week 30/EOT
Eluxadoline 100 mg17.2621.1022.6223.5224.1920.92
Eluxadoline 75 mg17.5121.6022.6924.1724.9122.79
Placebo14.0716.6219.5020.6421.5021.63

[back to top]

Number of Bowel Incontinence Episodes

Participants recorded the number of incontinence episodes over 24 hours daily throughout the treatment. (NCT01553747)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12 and 26

,,
Interventionincontinence episodes (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26
Eluxadoline 100 mg0.410.280.27
Eluxadoline 75 mg0.470.400.30
Placebo0.500.460.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Monthly Composite Responders

Percentage of monthly composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily composite response criteria for at least 50% of days with diary entry for a minimum of 20 days during each 4-week interval (weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12). Composite response includes both of the following criteria: 1) WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) BSS <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool). (NCT02959983)
Timeframe: Weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Weeks 1-4Weeks 5-8Weeks 9-12
Eluxadoline1426.730.8
Placebo6.914.916.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Responders

Percentage of pain responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily pain response criteria: WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval. (NCT02959983)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Weeks 1 to 12Weeks 1 to 4Weeks 5 to 8Weeks 9 to 12
Eluxadoline43.630.245.944.8
Placebo31.025.931.635.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Stool Consistency Responders

Percentage of stool consistency responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily stool consistency response criteria: BSS <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with daily patient diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool). A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval. (NCT02959983)
Timeframe: Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Weeks 1 to 12Weeks 1 to 4Weeks 5 to 8Weeks 9 to 12
Eluxadoline27.924.430.829.7
Placebo16.712.620.125.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores

Percentage of primary composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet both of the following daily composite criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entry: 1)Worst Abdominal Pain (WAP) score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) Bristol Stool Score (BSS) <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool). (NCT02959983)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline22.7
Placebo10.3

[back to top]

AUC: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During the Dosing Interval for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionnanogram* hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM9.22
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM7.75

[back to top]

CL/F: Apparent Total Clearance of the Drug From Plasma After Oral Administration for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionliter/hour (L/h) (Mean)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM20236
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM21901

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Concentration for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM1.40
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM0.91

[back to top]

Cmin: Minimum Concentration for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM0.39
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM0.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) Score Over 4 Weeks of Treatment Period

Stool consistency was assessed using the BSFS where: 1=Separate hard lumps like nuts to 7=Watery. The score was recorded by the participant in an electronic diary (e-diary). The score for each day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM5.89-1.25
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM5.34-1.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores During the Treatment Period

The participant recorded their worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours each day in an e-diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. The score each day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM1.77-0.12
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM3.13-1.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Bowel Movement Frequency During the Treatment Period

Bowel movements were recorded by the participant in an electronic diary (e-diary). The number of bowel movements per day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

,
Interventionbowel movements per day (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM4.18-1.48
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM2.86-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average of Daily Bloating Scores During the Treatment Period

The participant recorded their bloating score in the past 24 hours each day in an e-diary where: 0=no bloating to 10=worst imaginable bloating. The score each day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM2.31-0.47
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM4.07-1.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 4-week Average Number of Daily Urgent Bowel Movements During the Treatment Period

The participant recorded the number of urgent bowel movements in the past 24 hours each day in an e-diary. The number of urgent bowel movements per day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

,
Interventionurgent bowel movements per day (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM1.67-0.52
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM1.22-0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) Total Score at the End of the Treatment Period

IBS-QOL is composed of 34 items about how the symptoms of IBS are impacting the participant's life scored on a 1 to 5 scale, where lower item scores indicate greater quality of life. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0 to 100-point scale (0=worst; 100=better) for ease of interpretation. A positive change from Baseline indicates improved quality of life. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1) to End of Treatment (Up to Week 4)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM75.18.8
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM71.413.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (7αC4) Levels at the End of the Treatment Period

Participants fasted for at least 8 hours prior to the test. Fasting serum 7αC4 level was measured at Baseline and End of Treatment to determine whether any changes occurred following treatment with eluxadoline. The negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Up to Week 4)

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at End of Treatment
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM42.95-5.59
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM30.58-8.78

[back to top]

Vc/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

InterventionL (Mean)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM29432
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM39799

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Cmax for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionhours (h) (Median)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM1.5
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM2.0

[back to top]

t1/2: Half-Life for Eluxadoline

(NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Predose and at the intervals 1-2, 3-4 and 5-8 hours postdose at Week 2

Interventionh (Median)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM30.5
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM35.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is an AE that occurs or worsens after receiving investigational study drug. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM91.7
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM58.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Fecal Incontinence During the Treatment Period

The participant recorded the number of fecal incontinences in the past 24 hours each day in an e-diary. Fecal incontinence is the inability to control the passage of gas or stools. The number of fecal incontinences per day was averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM33.3
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM33.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Potentially Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs

Vital signs assessments included: pulse, respiratory rate, and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic). The investigator determined if the result was potentially clinically significant. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM0
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Potentially Clinically Significant Change in Laboratory Tests

Laboratory tests included tests of Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis. The investigator determined if the result was potentially clinically significant. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM0
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in General Physical Condition as Measured Through General Physical Exam

General Physical Examination consisted of a full review of body systems excluding pelvic and rectal exams. The investigator determined if the result was clinically significant. (NCT03441581)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eluxadoline 100 mg With BAM0
Eluxadoline 100 mg Without BAM0

[back to top]