Page last updated: 2024-11-12

adrenocorticotropic hormone

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

ACTH (5-10): RN given refers to parent cpd [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

ACTH (1-4): N-terminal tetrapeptide of ACTH [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID23036109
MeSH IDM0000499
PubMed CID10390695
MeSH IDM0000499
PubMed CID25084631
MeSH IDM0000499

Synonyms (11)

Synonym
acth (5-10)
acth (1-4)
(s)-2-((s)-2-((s)-2-((s)-2-amino-3-hydroxypropanamido)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanamido)-3-hydroxypropanamido)-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid
AKOS040744600
acth (1-10)
ser-tyr-ser-met-glu-his-phe-arg-trp-gly
HY-P1518
CS-0044637
EX-A7457
MS-32100
PD099876
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (35)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199018 (51.43)18.7374
1990's12 (34.29)18.2507
2000's5 (14.29)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other8 (100.00%)84.16%
Other8 (100.00%)84.16%
Other26 (100.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (106)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Changes in Autoreactive Memory B Cells as Biomarker of Response to Adrenocorticotropic Hormone in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy [NCT03025828]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-19Completed
DeFect cLOsure After Colonic ESD With underwaTer Technique Versus Conventional Clip : a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04214678]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
Decreasing the Incidence of Post-partum Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Gestational Diabetes Population- Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05202002]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Early Treatment of Infants at High Risk of Developing West Syndrome With Low-dose Adrenocorticotropin Hormone (ACTH) [NCT01367964]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Release in Healthy Children and Adolescent [NCT03709381]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
Study Title: A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy of H.P. Acthar Gel 80 U/ml to Improve the Signs and Symptoms in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease [NCT03287635]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Completed
A Multicenter, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of H.P. Acthar® Gel in the Treatment of Subjects With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [NCT03068754]Phase 2/Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-22Terminated(stopped due to As recommended by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB))
A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar® Gel in Subjects With Severe Keratitis [NCT04169061]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-13Completed
Feasibility of a New Ligation Using the Double-loop Clips Technique Versus Traditional Techniques in the Treatment of Large Wounds After Endoscopic Resection: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05042947]56 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open Label Pilot Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Severe Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, or Panuveitis (NIPPU) [NCT03656692]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-05Terminated(stopped due to Logistical challenges; no safety concerns)
Effectiveness of 12 Clips in Maternal and Neoanatal Health Through Applied Neuroscience Tools (Neuromarketing Strategy) [NCT03330860]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-16Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Acthar Gel in an Outpatient Dialysis Population [NCT02486744]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment challenges and unforseen costs to continue)
Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH) for the Treatment of Sarcoid Uveitis [NCT03473964]10 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-04-01Not yet recruiting
Acthar for Treatment of Post-transplant FSGS [NCT02399462]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding terminated prematurely)
A Multicenter, 2 Part Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis With Persistently Active Disease Despite Dual-DMARD Treatment [NCT02919761]Phase 4259 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-07Completed
ADRENL - ACTHAR Gel for Drug REsistant Nephrotic Syndrome in Children, Pilot Study [NCT03408405]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawal of funding from primary sponsor)
Staple Versus Suture Closure for Foot and Ankle Surgery [NCT03522753]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Resolving database issues)
Y a T-il Une désensibilisation Pendant le Sommeil après la réception de Violence Verbale ? [NCT03074578]32 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-08Recruiting
Use of Acthar in Rheumatoid Arthritis Related Flares [NCT02541955]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-20Recruiting
Efficacy of Repository Corticotropin Injection in Patients With Severe and Recalcitrant Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca [NCT03398018]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Change of direction)
ACTHAR GEL for Sarcoidosis-Associated Calcium Dysregulation: An Open-label Pilot Study [NCT02155803]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Dose-finding Pilot Study of ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) on the Proteinuria and Serum Lipoprotein Profile in Patients With Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (MN) [NCT01093157]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone for Intraocular Inflammation in Post-operative Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Patients [NCT03727776]Early Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-19Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Persistently Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Despite Moderate Dose Corticosteroids [NCT02953821]Phase 4172 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-16Completed
Effects of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation on Anxiety of Patients After COVID-19 - a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study [NCT05126511]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-19Completed
Clinical Impact of Acthar in the Psoriatic Arthritis Patient (CLIPS) [NCT03419650]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-20Completed
Prospective Open Label Study of H.P. Acthar Gel Injection in Patients With Active Non-Infectious Uveitis With Associated Glaucoma Thus High Frequency Regional Corticosteroid and Oral Corticosteroids Cause Intolerable Side-Effects [NCT02764697]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Ocular Sarcoidosis Open Label Trial of ACTHAR Gel [NCT02725177]9 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Safety and Efficacy Study of H.P. Acthar® Gel (Acthar) in Subjects With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) [NCT02113735]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to A company decision was made not to proceed with the study.)
Efficacy and Safety of H.P. Acthar Gel for the Treatment of Refractory Cutaneous Manifestations of Dermatomyositis [NCT02245841]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-15Completed
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) and Dysphagia in Lung Transplantation (LT) [NCT06089434]116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Corticotropin Stimulation in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Patients With Primary Aldosteronism The ADOPA Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04461535]228 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-08Completed
Prospective Study Evaluating the Effect of Repository Corticotropin in the Treatment of Various Nephrotic Syndromes [NCT01021540]Phase 418 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
The Influences of Watching a Movie Clip of Normal Walking on Measurable Walking Parameters Among Post-brain-stroke Patients as Opposed to the Influences of a Control Movie Clip Showing Backwards Walking [NCT00983450]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pulsed ACTH add-on Therapy to Weekly Avonex on Remyelination and Neuroregeneration in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. A 1-year Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded, Randomized Follow-up Study [NCT00986960]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficult to recruit due to protocol requirements - participant burden.)
Open-label Prospective Randomized Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dosing Regimens of ACTHar in the Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis. [NCT02226341]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Clip Closure of Mucosal Defects After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions as Prophylaxis of Delayed Haemorrhage. [NCT02765022]235 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Multi-centered, Randomized Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Bioactivity of Subcutaneous ACTH GeL in PAtients With Scleritis: The ATLAS Study [NCT03465111]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
"Safety and Efficacy of Acthar Gel on Albuminuria and Urinary Transforming Growth Factor Excretion in Type I or Type II Diabetics Requiring Medical Treatment of Hyperglycemia With Nephrotic Range Proteinuria: A Pilot Study" [NCT01028287]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
The Treatment of Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome With ACTH Gel (ACTHAR) [NCT01129284]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Pilot Study of Acthar® Gel in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Neuropathy [NCT02574962]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Withdrawn
Use of CXCL9 as a Biomarker of Acthar Efficacy [NCT02523092]Phase 414 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-03Recruiting
Relative Efficacy of Repeat Course of Intravenous methyLprednisolone and Intramuscular ACTH in the Treatment of Acute Relapse of Multiple Sclerosis After Sub Response to Initial Course of Intravenous Methylprednisolone (RECLAIM): a Single Center Pilot Stu [NCT00947895]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study reached halfway point in approximately one year time period and was halted to analyze data.)
Profile of Mother-caregivers of Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01921374]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
ACTH Treatment of APOL1- Associated Nephropathy [NCT02006849]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no enrollment)
An Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized, Phase II Study of the Safety, and Bioactivity of Two Dose Regimens of Subcutaneous Injections of ACTH Gel in Patients With Non-infectious Uveitis [NCT02931175]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Pilot Clinical Trial of ACTHar Gel 14 Days Subcutaneous (SQ) Versus ACTHar Gel Five Days SQ for the Treatment of MS Exacerbations [NCT01888354]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Prospective Proof-Of-Concept Trial to Evaluate the Response to Acthar Gel Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relapses Who Have Failed To Make an Adequate Recovery After Treatment With High-Dose Intravenous Methylprednisolone [NCT01900093]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
The Role of Pre-deployment Retraction in Decreasing Biopsy Clip Migration During Stereotactic Breast Biopsies [NCT04398537]245 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-03Completed
Effects of Corticorelin Administration on Dopamine Transmission, Craving, and Mood in Cocaine Dependence: A [11C]-(+)-PHNO PET Investigation [NCT01984177]17 participants (Actual)Observational2013-06-30Completed
Potential Neuroprotection With ACTHAR Following Acute Optic Neuritis [NCT01987167]Early Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
[NCT00005890]56 participants Interventional1996-03-31Completed
Dose Response Relationship for Single Doses of Corticotropin Releasing Hormone (CRH) in Normal Volunteers and in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency [NCT00001180]2,250 participants Observational1982-03-31Completed
Study of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone on Children With Frequent Relapse or Steroid-dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized,Open-label Clinical Trial. [NCT06079788]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery Clip Evaluation: Can We Improve Our Surgical Technique, Reduce Costs and Waste With the Aesculap U-clip Versus the Tele-Flex Hemolock Clip? [NCT01008709]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to poor enrollment)
Effects of CRH on the Sleep in Patients With Hypopituitarism [NCT00666068]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Efficacy, Safety, and Steroid Sparing Effect of Acthar in Patients With Hematologic Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT02779153]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to closed in agreement of the sponsor and institution due to lack of patient accrual.)
Availability and Safety Study of ACTH to Treat Children SRNS/SDNS [NCT02972346]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
Modeling and Treating the Pathophysiology of Demyelination in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00854750]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor Enrollment- schedule of assessments too complex and time-consuming.)
[NCT00004758]Phase 230 participants Interventional1993-11-30Completed
ACTHAR Therapy for Central Nervous System Sarcoidosis [NCT02920710]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficulty with recruitment)
Open Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Short-Term, Adjunctive Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Gel in Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT02030028]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Open-label, Pilot Protocol of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Were Treated With H.P. Acthar Gel After an Incomplete Response to Combinations of DMARDs and Biologic DMRADs [NCT03082573]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-03Recruiting
Effects of ACTHAR on Advanced MRI Surrogate Markers of Disease Activity and on Comprehensive Immune Signature During MS Relapses [NCT03021317]Phase 418 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-28Not yet recruiting
Stress Biomarkers:Attaching Biological Meaning to Field Friendly Salivary Measures [NCT01673087]Phase 1256 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Treatment of Proteinuria Due to Treatment Resistant or Treatment Intolerant Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Prospective Study of Acthar (PODOCYTE) [NCT02633046]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-10Completed
The Value of 25 mcg Cortrosyn Stimulation Test to Assess Adult HPA Axis [NCT01428336]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Improving The Assessment of Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Function In Acute Stress [NCT00493389]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Study of H.P. Acthar Gel (Acthar) in Treatment-Resistant Subjects With Persistent Proteinuria and Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (iMN) [NCT01386554]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Prospective Open Label Study of Acthar SQ Gel Injection in Patients With Active Anterior Uveitis Who Are Not Well Controlled With, or Intolerant of, Topical or Systemic Corticosteroids [NCT02769702]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Terminated
Efficacy and Accuracy of Combined Localization Versus Single Localization in Non-palpable Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy : a Prospective Randomized Control Trial. [NCT05838001]110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-16Recruiting
A Phase 3 Superiority Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of SNP-ACTH (1-39) Gel Compared to Rituximab and FDA Approved Biosimilars in Adults With Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) in a Two-Phase Adaptive Trial Design [NCT05696613]Phase 3148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-13Recruiting
Feasibility Study of Targeted Biopsy of Carbon Nanoparticles Labelled Axillary Node After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Clinically Assessed Positive Axillary Lymph Node (cN+) Breast Cancer [NCT04482803]159 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-24Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Two-Arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy of H.P. Acthar Injection Gel in the Treatment of Adults With Intractable Chronic Migraine [NCT01813591]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Effect of Blue Light Filtration on Visual Performance [NCT01938989]158 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Study to Explore the Safety and Tolerability of Acthar in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [NCT01906658]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Study of The Effect of Corticotrophin in Combination With Methotrexate in Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients From a Clinical and Structural Perspective As Measured by a Clinical Disease Activity Index Score and Bone Edema, Synovitis and Erosion [NCT01948388]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Parallel Group, Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar® in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03126760]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-22Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties and COVID-19 logistical challenges; no safety concerns)
Functional Benefit With ACRYSOF® Natural Chromophore [NCT02219997]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Treatment of Refractory Gout With Adrenocorticotropic Hormone or Methylprednisolone [NCT04808856]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
Tolerability of Acthar for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Relapses (TAMS) [NCT02258217]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Treatment of Chronic Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant With Acthar [NCT02546492]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
[NCT00004496]Phase 145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-02-28Completed
Acthar as Rescue Therapy for Transplant Glomerulopathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02057523]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to enroll patients, no longer at institution.)
Mechanisms of Increased Androgen Production Among Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00989781]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Repository Corticotropin Injection As Adjunctive Therapy In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed At Least Three Biologic Therapies With Different Modes Of Action [NCT01966718]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Influence of the Different Ways of Appendix Stump Closure on Patient Outcome in Laparoscopic Appendectomy [NCT02941640]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-02Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Exploratory Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis [NCT03320070]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-21Completed
Addition of H. P Acthar Gel to Treatment Regimen of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Controlled With Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs [NCT02434757]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-28Recruiting
The Effect of Corticotropin Release Hormone on Duodenal Markers and Gastric Sensorimotor Function in Healthy Volunteers [NCT05071781]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-21Recruiting
Impact of Acthar on Proteinuria and Disease Progression in IgA Nephropathy Patients With Nephrotic Range Proteinuria [NCT02382523]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to There were no subjects enrolled locally on this study since it opened. Local IRB closure has been requested.)
ACTHAR Gel for Cutaneous Sarcoidosis: An Open Label Trial [NCT02348905]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-03-31Not yet recruiting
Adrenal Responsiveness During the Perioperative Period in Children Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery [NCT01839812]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Risk of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding With Prophylactic Hemoclipping [NCT01647581]11,182 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-01Completed
The Effect of ACTH (Acthar) on Measures of Chronic Fatigue in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. [NCT02315872]Phase 38 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-22Completed
Clinical Evaluation of Spring-Type Laparoscopic Clip Technology [NCT00527644]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient funding to complete study)
The Adrenal Contribution to Androgen Production in Girls During Puberty [NCT01062568]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
The Effects of Acthar on Synovial Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study [NCT03511625]Phase 36 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-02Active, not recruiting
A Two-part Study Exploring the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Acthar in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With a History of Persistently Active Disease [NCT01753401]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Adaptive Design Pilot Safety and Efficacy Study of H.P. Acthar Gel (Acthar) in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy and Proteinuria. [NCT01601236]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Effects of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTHAR Gel) on Recovery From Cognitive Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT02290444]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
The Influence of Different Mood States and Emotions on the Physiologic, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses to Feeding Before Exercise [NCT05217589]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Effects on Myelination in Subjects With MS [NCT02446886]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) for Frequently Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT02132195]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Adenocorticotrophic Hormone for Acute Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Inadequate Response to Methotrexate [NCT01984268]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-23Terminated
Open Label Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Gel in Refractory Dermatomyositis or Polymyositis [NCT01906372]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00527644 (1) [back to overview]No Leak, Subclinical Leak or Clinical Bile Leak on Post-operative Hepato-iminodiacetic Acid (HIDA) Scan.
NCT00989781 (5) [back to overview]17-hydroxyprogesterone Responses to hCG in PCOS Women and Normal Controls
NCT00989781 (5) [back to overview]Follicle Count on 3-D Ultrasound in PCOS Women and Normal Controls
NCT00989781 (5) [back to overview]Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH)
NCT00989781 (5) [back to overview]Adrenal 17-hydroxyprogesterone Response to ACTH in PCOS Women and Normal Controls
NCT00989781 (5) [back to overview]17 Hydroxyprogesterone Response to hCG Injection After Lowered Insulin Levels.
NCT01062568 (3) [back to overview]Free Testosterone Response to ACTH
NCT01062568 (3) [back to overview]Androstenedione Response to ACTH
NCT01062568 (3) [back to overview]17-hydroxyprogesterone Response to ACTH
NCT01129284 (2) [back to overview]Sustained Remissions up to 1 Year After Discontinuing Therapy
NCT01129284 (2) [back to overview]Significant Reduction in Proteinuria to Remission Levels During the Treatment Period (Includes Complete and Partial Remission, as Defined in the Outcome Measure Description Below)
NCT01386554 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission
NCT01386554 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Remission in Proteinuria at 24 Weeks
NCT01428336 (3) [back to overview]Pearson Correlation of the Total Cortisol Levels Between the ITT and CSTs
NCT01428336 (3) [back to overview]Pearson Correlation of Free Cortisol Values During CSTs With ITT
NCT01428336 (3) [back to overview]Peak Total Cortisol Values
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Whose Best Response Was Complete or Partial Remission of Proteinuria
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Frequency of Patients With a Doubling of Serum Creatinine, Progression to End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), or Death
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Complete or Partial Remission of Proteinuria
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, LDL, HDL, Lp(a), Albumin, and Cortisol
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Protein to Creatinine Ratio (PCR)
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in eGFR by Visit
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Visit 12
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in eGFR at Visit 17
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Change in Mean HbA1c
NCT01601236 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in eGFR Calculated Using Cystatin C
NCT01647581 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Delayed Post Polypectomy Bleeding
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Tender or Swollen Joints Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (MCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]BILAG Total Score Within 8 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Tender or Swollen Joints at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Relapse Within 52 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 4 Weeks
NCT01753401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder at Week 52
NCT01906372 (2) [back to overview]Specific Aim 1: Number of Subjects Meeting IMACS Preliminary Definition of Improvement (DOI).
NCT01906372 (2) [back to overview]Steroid-sparing Effect of H.P. Acthar Gel in Refractory Adult PM and DM Patients.
NCT01906658 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) That Required Study Drug Discontinuation or Could Not be Controlled With Concomitant Medication
NCT01906658 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events That Could Not be Controlled by Concomitant Medication
NCT01906658 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events That Required Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01906658 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Suicidality
NCT01938989 (1) [back to overview]Photostress Recovery Time
NCT01948388 (5) [back to overview]Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings
NCT01948388 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements
NCT01948388 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist
NCT01948388 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
NCT01948388 (5) [back to overview]Participants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)
NCT01966718 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Ritchey-Camp Articular Index
NCT01966718 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
NCT01966718 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level
NCT01966718 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 20-item Health Assessment Questionnaire Score
NCT02030028 (5) [back to overview]Changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 12
NCT02030028 (5) [back to overview]Patient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 12
NCT02030028 (5) [back to overview]Change in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 12
NCT02030028 (5) [back to overview]Change in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12
NCT02030028 (5) [back to overview]Changes in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12
NCT02057523 (2) [back to overview]50% Reduction in Proteinuria or Proteinuria < 150mg/Day
NCT02057523 (2) [back to overview]25% Improvement in the MDRD eGFR
NCT02132195 (3) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT02132195 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experienced a Relapse of Nephrotic Syndrome
NCT02132195 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Relapses After Dose Reduction of ACTH
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (ACRYSOF® IQ IOL + Placebo Filter; Clear IOL + BLF)
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (Clear IOLs)
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]SAGE (Self-administered Gerocognitive Exam) Scores
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) TCS Scores (Total Composite Scores)
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]MSIS (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale) - 29 Psychological Score.
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]MSIS (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale) -29 Physical Score
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) ADL Scores (Activities of Daily Living)
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) PCS Scores (Partial Composite Scores)
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) RSH Scores (Return to Previous Health)
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) Scores.
NCT02258217 (9) [back to overview]GASE Scale Questionnaire (Generic Assessment of Side Effects)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Timed 25-foot Walk
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS)
NCT02290444 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)
NCT02315872 (4) [back to overview]Quality of Life at 28 Weeks
NCT02315872 (4) [back to overview]Depression at 28 Weeks
NCT02315872 (4) [back to overview]Sleepiness at 28 Weeks
NCT02315872 (4) [back to overview]Fatigue at 28 Weeks
NCT02446886 (4) [back to overview]Change in T2 Lesion Volume
NCT02446886 (4) [back to overview]Longitudinal Assessment of MWF
NCT02446886 (4) [back to overview]Physical Disability as Measured by EDSS
NCT02446886 (4) [back to overview]Change in Myelin Water Fraction (MWF) Within New Enhancing Lesions Over the Course of 12 Months
NCT02546492 (2) [back to overview]Safety (Serious Adverse Events)
NCT02546492 (2) [back to overview]Efficacy Outcome
NCT02633046 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02725177 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%
NCT02725177 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema
NCT02725177 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity
NCT02725177 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation
NCT02764697 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement of Macular Edema
NCT02769702 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eye With Uveitis of Anterior Chamber Cellularity Graded From 0-4 on a Likert Scale Determined by Slit Lamp Examination
NCT02769702 (2) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in Eye With Uveitis of Anterior Chamber Protein Graded 0-4 on a Likert Scale Determined by Slit Lamp Evaluation
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Patient-Reported General Health by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Tender Joint Count by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Patient-Reported General Health by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Number of Participants Who Maintained Low Disease Activity by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Swollen Joint Count by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activities by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 1: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Tender Joint Count by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Swollen Joint Count by Visit During Part 2
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activities by Visit
NCT02919761 (14) [back to overview]Part 2: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain by Visit
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Time of Application
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Operative Time
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Intra-perative Complications
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Hospital Stay
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Complications
NCT02941640 (6) [back to overview]Overall Morbidity
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least a 4 Point Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K)
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Mean Number of Swollen or Tender Joints on the 28-Joint Count
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Mean Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Score- Activity (CLASI) Total Activity Score
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG 2004)
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Severe Flare, Based on the SELENA Flare Index (SFI) at Week 16
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
NCT02953821 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decrease in Prednisone Dose to < 7.5 mg/Day at Week 20 and Week 24
NCT03025828 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Remission
NCT03025828 (5) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT03025828 (5) [back to overview]Change in Serum Albumin
NCT03025828 (5) [back to overview]Change in Proteinuria
NCT03025828 (5) [back to overview]Change in CD4+CD25+CD127low T Regulatory Cells/CD4+ T Cell Ratio
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Period: Spirometry (%)
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Period: Scores on a Scale for Telephone-administered Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R)
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Period: Scores on a Scale for Investigator-administered ALSFRS-R
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event During the Treatment Period
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event by the End of the Trial in the OLE Period
NCT03068754 (6) [back to overview]Extension Period: Scores on a Scale for Investigator-administered ALSFRS-R
NCT03126760 (1) [back to overview]Score on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at Baseline and Day 42
NCT03287635 (3) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT03287635 (3) [back to overview]Dry Eye Comfort Questionnaire, SANDE
NCT03287635 (3) [back to overview]1. Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the KSQ (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the DLCO, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on HRCT at Week 48
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FVC, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 48
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Fatigue Assessment Score (FAS), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on High Resolution Computer Tomography (HRCT) at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 24
NCT03320070 (12) [back to overview]OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FAS, a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48
NCT04169061 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Improved on the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Scale [Using the Symptom Bother Module at Week 12]
NCT04398537 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Breast Biopsy Patients Whose Clip Migrated Greater Than 10mm From the Biopsy Site.
NCT04398537 (4) [back to overview]Number of Breast Biopsy Patients Whose Clip Migrated Greater Than 10mm From the Biopsy Site.
NCT04398537 (4) [back to overview]Average Distance of Clip Migration for the Arm That Received 5mm Retraction.
NCT04398537 (4) [back to overview]Average Distance of Clip Migration for the Arm That Did Not Receive Clip Retraction.

No Leak, Subclinical Leak or Clinical Bile Leak on Post-operative Hepato-iminodiacetic Acid (HIDA) Scan.

(NCT00527644)
Timeframe: By post op day one HIDA scan.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Spring Clips14

[back to top]

17-hydroxyprogesterone Responses to hCG in PCOS Women and Normal Controls

Change from baseline in 17-hydroxyprogesterone at 24 hours after hCG injection (NCT00989781)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 hours after hCG

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
NR-PCOS Women1.3
HR-PCOS Women3
Normal Women1.1

[back to top]

Follicle Count on 3-D Ultrasound in PCOS Women and Normal Controls

3-D ultrasound was not assessed; instead 2-D ultrasound was performed (NCT00989781)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionAntral Follicle Count (Mean)
NR-PCOS Women64.4
HR-PCOS Women49.3
Normal Women31.8

[back to top]

Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH)

(NCT00989781)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
NR-PCOS Women16.0
HR-PCOS Women6.7
Normal Women5.3

[back to top]

Adrenal 17-hydroxyprogesterone Response to ACTH in PCOS Women and Normal Controls

17-hydroxyprogesterone response to ACTH infusion in women with PCOS and normal women. Response is reported as a single value generated by summing the data at end time frame. (NCT00989781)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after ACTH

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
NR-PCOS Women6.0
HR-PCOS Women8.1
Normal Women6.2

[back to top]

17 Hydroxyprogesterone Response to hCG Injection After Lowered Insulin Levels.

17 hydroxyprogesterone levels (NCT00989781)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 after hCG

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NR-PCOS Women0
HR-PCOS Women0
Normal Women0

[back to top]

Free Testosterone Response to ACTH

Free Testosteorne levels before and after ACTH (NCT01062568)
Timeframe: 0 and 60 min after ACTH administration

,
Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Normal weightOverweight
Early Puberty Group23.5
Late Puberty Group732

[back to top]

Androstenedione Response to ACTH

Androstenedione levels before and after ACTH (NCT01062568)
Timeframe: 0 and 60 min after ACTH administration

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Normal WieghtOverweight
Early Puberty0.50.6
Late Puberty1.63.1

[back to top]

17-hydroxyprogesterone Response to ACTH

17-hyrooxyprogesterone levels before and after ACTH (NCT01062568)
Timeframe: 0 and 60 minutes after ACTH administration

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Normal WeightOver Weight
Early Puberty Group2.42.9
Late Puberty Group3.73.1
Total Number3.13.0

[back to top]

Sustained Remissions up to 1 Year After Discontinuing Therapy

Complete remission defined as stable or improved renal function, serum creatinine < or = 125% baseline, with proteinuria falling <500 mg/day at last follow-up visit (6 to 12 months post treatment). Partial remission defined as stable or improved renal function, serum creatinine < or = 125% baseline, with 50% reduction in proteinuria and final proteinuria 500-3500 mg/day at last follow-up visit (6 to 12 months post treatment). (NCT01129284)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Membranous Nephropathy3
FSGS/MCD2
IgA Nephropathy2

[back to top]

Significant Reduction in Proteinuria to Remission Levels During the Treatment Period (Includes Complete and Partial Remission, as Defined in the Outcome Measure Description Below)

Complete remission is defined as stable or improved renal function, serum creatinine < or = 125% baseline, with proteinuria falling <500 mg/day at month 6. Partial remission is defined as stable or improved renal function, serum creatinine < or = 125% baseline, with 50% reduction in proteinuria and final proteinuria 500-3500 mg/day at month 6. (NCT01129284)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Membranous Nephropathy2
FSGS/MCD2
IgA Nephropathy3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission

The participant's response was considered the average of the two PCR values from the 24-hour urine collections at Visit 8 (Week 24). (NCT01386554)
Timeframe: At Visit 9 (Week 28)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar 40U1
Acthar 80U4
Combined Placebo2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Remission in Proteinuria at 24 Weeks

The participant's response was considered the average of the two PCR values from the 24-hour urine collected at Visit 8 (Week 24). Urine protein creatinine ratio (uPCR) was used to assess remission (partial and complete). Complete remission = uPCR < 0.3 g/g; partial remission = uPCR < 50% of baseline uPCR and > 0.3 g/g but < 3.0 g/g. (NCT01386554)
Timeframe: At Visit 8 (Week 24)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial remission in proteinuriaComplete remission in proteinuria
Acthar 40U10
Acthar 80U50
Combined Placebo20

[back to top]

Pearson Correlation of the Total Cortisol Levels Between the ITT and CSTs

Correlation of total cortisol levels of 1 ug, 25 ug and 250 ug cortrosyn stimulation test with Insulin Tolerance test is described in the outcome table (NCT01428336)
Timeframe: 1 hour for the CST interventions and 2 hour for the ITT interventions

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Peak 1 ug ACTH stimulation testPeak 25 ug ACTH stimultion test60-minute 250ug ACTH stimulation test30-minute 250ug ACTH stimulation test
Patients + Volunteers0.80.860.930.92

[back to top]

Pearson Correlation of Free Cortisol Values During CSTs With ITT

Correlation of free cortisol levels of 1 ug, 25 ug and 250 ug cortrosyn stimulation test with Insulin Tolerance test is described in the outcome table (NCT01428336)
Timeframe: 1 hour for the CST interventions and 2 hour for the ITT interventions

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Peak 1ug ACTH stimulation testPeak 25ug ACTH stimulation test60- minute 250ug ACTH stimulation test30-minute 250ug ACTH stimulation test
Patients + Volunteers0.580.700.880.89

[back to top]

Peak Total Cortisol Values

Peak total cortisol values during cortrosyn stimulation tests(CST) (NCT01428336)
Timeframe: 1 hour for the CST interventions and 2 hour for the ITT interventions

,
Interventionug/dl (Median)
Insulin Tolerance Test1 ug ACTH stimulation test25 ug ACTH stimulation test30 min 250 ug ACTH stimulation test60 min 250 ug ACTH simulation test
Patients23.323.422.022.325.0
Volunteers16.614.517.416.119.1

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Whose Best Response Was Complete or Partial Remission of Proteinuria

Proportion of subjects whose best response was complete remission (PCR 0.5 g/g) or partial remission (reduction in PCR of >50% from baseline, plus PCR≤2.5 g/g but >0.5 g/g) of proteinuria (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 12 (Week 36) and Visit 17 (Week 52)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 3672027592Week 3672027590Week 3672027591Between Week 36 and Week 5272027590Between Week 36 and Week 5272027591Between Week 36 and Week 5272027592
Complete remissionPartial remissionNo remission
Placebo0
Acthar 8 Units0
Acthar 16 Units1
Placebo1
Acthar 16 Units3
Placebo9
Acthar 8 Units7
Acthar 16 Units12
Acthar 16 Units2
Placebo8
Acthar 8 Units2
Acthar 16 Units5

[back to top]

Frequency of Patients With a Doubling of Serum Creatinine, Progression to End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), or Death

(NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 12 (Week 36) and Visit 17 (Week 52)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 12 (Week 36)72027591Visit 12 (Week 36)72027592Visit 12 (Week 36)72027590Visit 17 (Week 52)72027591Visit 17 (Week 52)72027592Visit 17 (Week 52)72027590
YesNo
Acthar 8 Units1
Acthar 16 Units1
Acthar 8 Units6
Acthar 16 Units15
Placebo0
Acthar 16 Units2
Placebo10
Acthar 16 Units14

[back to top]

Complete or Partial Remission of Proteinuria

Proportion of patients with complete remission (PCR 0.5 g/g) or partial remission (reduction in PCR of >50% from baseline, plus PCR≤2.5 g/g but >0.5 g/g) of proteinuria at Visit 12 (Week 36) and/or at Visit 17 (Week 52) (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 12 (Week 36) and Visit 17 (Week 52)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 12 (Week 36)72027590Visit 12 (Week 36)72027592Visit 12 (Week 36)72027591Visit 17 (Week 52)72027590Visit 17 (Week 52)72027591Visit 17 (Week 52)72027592
No remissionComplete remissionPartial remission
Placebo0
Acthar 16 Units1
Placebo1
Acthar 16 Units0
Placebo8
Acthar 8 Units3
Acthar 16 Units7
Acthar 8 Units0
Placebo6
Acthar 8 Units2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, LDL, HDL, Lp(a), Albumin, and Cortisol

Percent change from baseline of serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, Lp(a), albumin, and cortisol (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 6, 9, 12, and 17

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Total cholesterol - Baseline to Visit 6Total cholesterol - Baseline to Visit 9Total cholesterol - Baseline to Visit 12Total cholesterol - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointTotal cholesterol - Baseline to Visit 17Total cholesterol - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointTriglycerides - Baseline to Visit 6Triglycerides - Baseline to Visit 9Triglycerides - Baseline to Visit 12Triglycerides - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointTriglycerides - Baseline to Visit 17Triglycerides - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointLDL-C - Baseline to Visit 6LDL-C - Baseline to Visit 9LDL-C - Baseline to Visit 12LDL-C - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointLDL-C - Baseline to Visit 17LDL-C - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointHDL-C - Baseline to Visit 6HDL-C - Baseline to Visit 9HDL-C - Baseline to Visit 12HDL-C - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointHDL-C - Baseline to Visit 17HDL-C - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointLp(a) - Baseline to Visit 6Lp(a) - Baseline to Visit 9Lp(a) - Baseline to Visit 12Lp(a) - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointLp(a) - Baseline to Visit 17Lp(a) - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointSerum albumin - Baseline to Visit 6Serum albumin - Baseline to Visit 9Serum albumin - Baseline to Visit 12Serum albumin - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointSerum albumin - Baseline to Visit 17Serum albumin - Baseline to Week 52 EndpointCortisol - Baseline to Visit 6Cortisol - Baseline to Visit 9Cortisol - Baseline to Visit 12Cortisol - Baseline to Week 36 EndpointCortisol - Baseline to Visit 17Cortisol - Baseline to Week 52 Endpoint
Acthar 16 Units10.114.211.112.99.69.420.531.029.219.927.718.28.124.526.412.425.924.118.13.4-6.919.0-9.2-3.222.728.010.716.921.721.2-3.78-3.75-4.09-7.23-2.33-2.75180.7050.0852.7764.327.0930.21
Acthar 8 Units34.120.311.126.4-12.126.830.07.9-7.148.8-37.433.547.436.123.242.0-9.943.211.89.811.46.73.0-0.235.91.223.349.219.955.6-9.79-7.77-2.67-5.968.06-6.1545.0814.4417.7263.4684.2651.82
Placebo-7.213.93.43.96.36.31.618.48.38.922.622.6-4.816.916.015.97.47.4-3.20.03.72.8-5.0-5.0-7.21.96.17.528.528.5-1.92-2.49-0.89-1.42-0.22-1.77-5.86-11.23-9.44-8.36-13.11-8.53

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Protein to Creatinine Ratio (PCR)

Percent change from baseline in PCR (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visits 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Baseline to Visit 4Baseline to Visit 5Baseline to Visit 6Baseline to Visit 7Baseline to Visit 8Baseline to Visit 9Baseline to Visit 10Baseline to Visit 11Baseline to Visit 12Baseline to Week 36 EndpointBaseline to Visit 14Baseline to Visit 15Baseline to Visit 16Baseline to Visit 17Baseline to Week 52 Endpoint
Acthar 16 Units32.57012.0594-1.6086-10.6879-8.53813.6409-6.75000.456614.461950.2732-16.49560.00913.6555-6.235612.1049
Acthar 8 Units44.750847.442972.174055.995053.213482.731918.989869.864659.835734.884811.76634.380721.753619.162566.7698
Placebo0.3837-13.6630-8.33262.462112.660127.14838.259415.120521.354019.18471.18940.62940.002520.864432.9735

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in eGFR by Visit

Percent change from baseline in eGFR by visit (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Baseline to Visit 3Baseline to Visit 4Baseline to Visit 5Baseline to Visit 6Baseline to Visit 7Baseline to Visit 8Baseline to Visit 9Baseline to Visit 10Baseline to Visit 11Baseline to Visit 12Baseline to Week 36 EndpointBaseline to Visit 13Baseline to Visit 14Baseline to Visit 15Baseline to Visit 16Baseline to Visit 17Baseline to Week 52 Endpoint
Acthar 16 Units0.86-2.69-12.01-14.20-17.33-17.58-23.25-20.57-19.05-18.32-17.55-23.46-29.96-19.95-27.33-24.55-22.44
Acthar 8 Units1.824.39-10.11-9.36-25.42-27.46-21.04-28.73-26.13-23.54-20.27-29.37-33.99-38.05-40.18-42.70-36.50
Placebo-6.19-11.76-8.42-12.73-12.30-11.64-14.46-15.75-14.71-26.09-24.96-17.94-21.88-17.40-19.16-18.43-20.69

[back to top]

Percent Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Visit 12

Percent change in eGFR at Visit 12 (Week 36) compared to average baseline eGFR obtained during screening (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 12 (Week 36)

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-24.927
Acthar 8 Units-20.563
Acthar 16 Units-17.447

[back to top]

Percent Change in eGFR at Visit 17

Percent change in eGFR at Visit 17 (Week 52) compared to baseline eGFR obtained during screening (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 17 (Week 52)

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-20.407
Acthar 8 Units-37.456
Acthar 16 Units-22.097

[back to top]

Change in Mean HbA1c

Change from baseline mean HbA1c (%) to Week 36 (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Week 36

Intervention%HbA1c (Mean)
Placebo-0.22
Acthar 8 Units-0.33
Acthar 16 Units-0.25

[back to top]

Percent Change in eGFR Calculated Using Cystatin C

Percent change in eGFR calculated using cystatin C compared to baseline obtained at Visit 2. (NCT01601236)
Timeframe: Visit 12 (Week 36) and Visit 17 (Week 52)

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 12 (Week 36)Visit 17 (Week 52)
Acthar 16 Units-10.24-12.43
Acthar 8 Units-11.49-35.90
Placebo-14.251.14

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Delayed Post Polypectomy Bleeding

rectal bleeding with associated Hb 2g drop, hemodynamic instability, or need for repeat colonoscopy or angiography or surgery (NCT01647581)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Clip12
No Clip15

[back to top]

Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo/Acthar43.618
Acthar/Acthar39.710

[back to top]

Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) at Week 52

"The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree) to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from no fatigue to fatigue as bad as could be. Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue.~This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue)." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo/Acthar4.523
Acthar/Acthar4.743

[back to top]

Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) at Week 52

The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo/Acthar0.4
Acthar/Acthar1.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 8 Weeks

"Participants are counted as responders based on:~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo3
Acthar11

[back to top]

Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI Within 8 Weeks

"SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI).~The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity.~Rows: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Acthar8.08.06.06.0
Placebo10.09.08.09.0

[back to top]

Number of Tender or Swollen Joints Within 8 Weeks

The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Baseline, at Week 4, and at Week 8 (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

,
InterventionTender or Swollen Joints (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar9.64.53.5
Placebo6.23.84.0

[back to top]

Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks

"The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar31.52635.31835.701
Placebo32.92732.83133.310

[back to top]

Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (MCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks

The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar38.40640.28040.408
Placebo41.30438.74439.256

[back to top]

Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) Within 8 Weeks

"The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree) to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from no fatigue to fatigue as bad as could be. Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue.~This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue).~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar5.6485.2985.152
Placebo5.3745.3795.404

[back to top]

Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Within 8 Weeks

"The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar6.44.83.7
Placebo6.16.35.7

[back to top]

BILAG Total Score Within 8 Weeks

"The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems.~The 8 systems are scored on a scale from 0=not present to 4=worse, for the 4 week period before the assessment. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 32. A higher score means the symptoms are worse.~Rows: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8
Acthar15.79.26.8
Placebo15.410.313.5

[back to top]

Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI at Week 52

"SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI).~The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo/Acthar3
Acthar/Acthar4

[back to top]

Number of Tender or Swollen Joints at Week 52

The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Week 52. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

InterventionTender or Swollen Joints (Mean)
Placebo/Acthar1.1
Acthar/Acthar0.7

[back to top]

Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo/Acthar45.272
Acthar/Acthar39.700

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Relapse Within 52 Weeks

(NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo/Acthar1
Acthar/Acthar6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 4 Weeks

"Participants are counted as responders based on two SLE indices: the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index amended by the SELENA group (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index.~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for the arthritis descriptor (highest possible score is 4) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash (highest possible score is 2) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations. It has an ordinal scale scoring system by design that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The individual system scores were not intended to be summated into a global score." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo3
Acthar4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder at Week 52

"Participants are counted as responders based on:~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo/Acthar4
Acthar/Acthar3

[back to top]

Specific Aim 1: Number of Subjects Meeting IMACS Preliminary Definition of Improvement (DOI).

3 of any of the 6 core set measures (CSM) improved by ≥ 20%, with no more than 2 CSM worsening by ≥25% (worsening measure cannot include the MMT). The DOI should be met at least once on any of the 6 follow up visits and maintained until week 24. Subjects not meeting DOI during the trial are treatment failures. (NCT01906372)
Timeframe: Primary end point: IMACS preliminary definition of improvement (DOI)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar Gel7

[back to top]

Steroid-sparing Effect of H.P. Acthar Gel in Refractory Adult PM and DM Patients.

Mean change in glucocorticoid dose (equivalent prednisone dose) at 24 weeks compared to baseline. (NCT01906372)
Timeframe: Steroid sparing effect and safety and tolerability at 24 weeks compared to baseline

Interventionmg (Mean)
Follow Up 24 weeksBaseline
Acthar Gel2.318.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) That Required Study Drug Discontinuation or Could Not be Controlled With Concomitant Medication

(NCT01906658)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar 80 U (1.0 mL) SC Twice Weekly2
Acthar 24 U (0.3 mL) SC Daily0
Acthar 56 U (0.7 mL) SC Twice Weekly2
Acthar 16 U (0.2 mL) SC Daily0

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events That Could Not be Controlled by Concomitant Medication

(NCT01906658)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar 80 U (1.0 mL) SC Twice Weekly0
Acthar 24 U (0.3 mL) SC Daily0
Acthar 56 U (0.7 mL) SC Twice Weekly0
Acthar 16 U (0.2 mL) SC Daily0

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events That Required Study Drug Discontinuation

(NCT01906658)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar 80 U (1.0 mL) SC Twice Weekly2
Acthar 24 U (0.3 mL) SC Daily0
Acthar 56 U (0.7 mL) SC Twice Weekly2
Acthar 16 U (0.2 mL) SC Daily0

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Suicidality

(NCT01906658)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar 80 U (1.0 mL) SC Twice Weekly1
Acthar 24 U (0.3 mL) SC Daily3
Acthar 56 U (0.7 mL) SC Twice Weekly0
Acthar 16 U (0.2 mL) SC Daily0

[back to top]

Photostress Recovery Time

Photostress Recovery Time is the time necessary to recover function (e.g., contrast discrimination) following exposure to a bright glare source. The subject fixated on an image (black and white grating) and underwent photostress (glare) for 5 seconds. Only 1 eye (study eye) was assessed. (NCT01938989)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Blue Light Filter5.66
Clear6.94

[back to top]

Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings

"Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0).~CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement" (NCT01948388)
Timeframe: Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
# of patients whose CDAI score improved# of patients whose overall MRI improved
Group 186
Group 285

[back to top]

Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements

To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0) (NCT01948388)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline : synovitisBaseline : osteitisBaseline : erosionsMonth 3 : synovitisMonth 3 : osteitisMonth 3 : erosionsMonth 6 : synovitisMonth 6 : osteitisMonth 6 : erosions
Group 1889669547
Group 2748768748

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist

"Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings.~Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0)." (NCT01948388)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3 : Progressed erosionsMonth 3 : Regressed erosionsMonth 6 : Progressed erosionsMonth 6 : Regressed erosions
Group 11021
Group 23222

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score

To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity. (NCT01948388)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline72173377Baseline72173376Month 372173376Month 372173377Month 672173377Month 672173376
remissionmoderate disease activitylow disease activityhigh disease activity
Group 20
Group 19
Group 28
Group 13
Group 21
Group 12
Group 24
Group 22
Group 10
Group 23
Group 14
Group 11

[back to top]

Participants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)

comparisons not statistical analysis will be made from Baseline and Month 6 of the C- reactive Protein (CRP) values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) to determine the number of patients whose test result improved or worsenedCRP value (normal range <1.0 mg/dl). ESR (normal range 0-28 mm/hr) . If the value is increased, the disease activity worsened. If the value is reduced the disease activity is improved. (NCT01948388)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CRP Values72173379CRP Values72173378ESR Values72173378ESR Values72173379
# of patient with Decreased values# of patients with Increased values
Group 18
Group 27
Group 11
Group 21
Group 19
Group 28
Group 10
Group 20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Ritchey-Camp Articular Index

Change in the Number of Joints that had Tenderness and/or Swelling According to the Ritchey-Camp Articular Index. Change was calculated using baseline and week 16 time points. (NCT01966718)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 16

Interventionjoints (Mean)
Swollen Joints10.25
Tender Joints9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

ESR was measured at baseline at week 16. Change was measured by subtracting week 16 score from baseline score. A positive number indicates that the ESR decreased (NCT01966718)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 16

Interventionmm/hr (Mean)
Repository Corticotropin Injection1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level

CRP was measured at Baseline and Week 16. Change was calculated by subtracting week 16 value from baseline value, with a positive value indicating a decrease from baseline. (NCT01966718)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Repository Corticotropin Injection0.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 20-item Health Assessment Questionnaire Score

"Subjects completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire, a 20-item scale that measures health-related quality of life. Participants are asked to rate activities on a scale from able to do with no difficulties to unable to do. A score of 0 indicates the participant has no problems performing daily activities, while a score of 3 indicates that the participant is completely disabled. Scores were calculated by subtracting score at week 16 from baseline score. A positive number indicates the score went down from baseline to week 16." (NCT01966718)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Repository Corticotropin Injection0.03

[back to top]

Changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 12

percentage of participants achieving >20% improvement in CDAI after 12 weeks of therapy (>20% reduction in CDAI relative to baseline based on ratio of CDAI at week 12 to CDAI at week 0: CDAI Week 12/CDAI Week 0 < 0.8 meets criteria for improvement, as lower CDAI scores represent lower disease activity) (NCT02030028)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACTHAR Gel8

[back to top]

Patient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 12

The FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) scoring metric assesses fatigue using 13 questions rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no fatigue)-4 (severe fatigue); total scores range from 0-52, with higher total scores representing more severe fatigue. The difference in FACIT-F scores between weeks 12 and week 0 (calculated as FACIT-F score week 12 minus FACIT-F score at week 0) indicates changes in fatigue relative to baseline, where reduction of FACIT-F score at week 12 represents improvement in fatigue. (NCT02030028)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
ACTHAR Gel-3.8

[back to top]

Change in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 12

Change in ESR--reduction in ESR at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0) represents improvement (week 12 ESR - baseline ERS < 0) (NCT02030028)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmm/hr (Mean)
ACTHAR Gel-7.38

[back to top]

Change in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12

"Change in the Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0), where lower DAS28-CRP scores at week 12 represent improvement.~Scale: 0-8.61 (lower scores indicate reduced disease activity)" (NCT02030028)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ACTHAR Gel-0.87

[back to top]

Changes in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12

Changes in C-reactive protein value (mg/dl): reduction in CRP values at week 12 relative to week 0 represents improvement (week 12 CRP-baseline CRP < 0)) (NCT02030028)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
ACTHAR Gel0.36

[back to top]

50% Reduction in Proteinuria or Proteinuria < 150mg/Day

(NCT02057523)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar1

[back to top]

25% Improvement in the MDRD eGFR

(NCT02057523)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acthar1

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

Adverse events will be collected (SAEs and AEs) (NCT02132195)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)12
No Treatment4
Rescue Therapy17

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experienced a Relapse of Nephrotic Syndrome

Number of participants experienced a relapse of nephrotic syndrome during the initial 6 months of the study. (NCT02132195)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)14
No Treatment15

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Relapses After Dose Reduction of ACTH

The dose of ACTH will be reduced by 50% after 6 months and the rate of relapse during this period will be evaluated. (NCT02132195)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)0
Rescue Therapy0

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
AcrySof IQ IOL0.07
Clear IOL0.15

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (ACRYSOF® IQ IOL + Placebo Filter; Clear IOL + BLF)

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, Up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
ACRYSOF IQ IOL + Placebo Filter0.12
Clear IOL + BLF0.16

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (Clear IOLs)

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. This outcome measure was pre-specified for Clear IOL only. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, Up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Placebo Filter0.17
Blue Light Filter0.16

[back to top]

SAGE (Self-administered Gerocognitive Exam) Scores

"The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam (SAGE) is designed to detect early signs of cognitive, memory or thinking impairments. It evaluates your thinking abilities and helps physicians to know how well your brain is working.~It consists of 12 questions which are scored at different scales. The final SAGE score is calculated as a sum of these 12 questions and it ranges from 0 to 22.~Higher score indicates better outcome." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline and follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
SAGE (new relapse)SAGE (after treatment of new relapse)
Single Arm2121

[back to top]

ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) TCS Scores (Total Composite Scores)

"Patients completed the ARMS survey after treatment for the new relapse.The ARMS questionnaire (assessing relapses in multiple sclerosis) was developed by a panel of expert MS nurses. Part one consists of 7 questions designed to assess relapse symptoms, impact on activities of daily living, and response to past treatment for MS relapses. Part two consists of 7 questions to evaluate treatment response in terms of relief from symptoms, functioning and tolerability.~The TCS score was calculated only for the time point after treatment of relapse. It was a sum of questions 4 (symptom improvement), 5 (ADL), and 6 (return to previous state of health (RSH)) were evaluated. Scores range from 0 to 30 units, with higher scores representing greater improvement/better functioning." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: Follow-up visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Single Arm14.3

[back to top]

MSIS (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale) - 29 Psychological Score.

"The MSIS-29 is a self-reported questionnaire in which MS patients answer a series of 29 questions designed to capture the impact of multiple sclerosis on their life over the past 2 weeks (11). Twenty of the 29 questions assess the physical impact of MS and 9 questions assess the psychological impact of MS.~The psychological impact of MS was compared between pre and post phase using paired t-tests.~The psychological impact of MS was compared between pre and post phase using paired t-tests.~The score was on a scale of 9 to 45 points for MSIS psychological score.~Higher score indicate worse outcome." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline visit & follow-up after treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
MSIS psychological(new relapse)MSIS psychological(after treatment of new relapse)
Single Arm29.426.3

[back to top]

MSIS (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale) -29 Physical Score

"The MSIS-29 is a self-reported questionnaire in which MS patients answer a series of 29 questions designed to capture the impact of multiple sclerosis on their life over the past 2 weeks (11). Twenty of the 29 questions assess the physical impact of MS.~The physical impact of MS was compared between pre and post phase using paired t-tests. Each question is answered with points ranging from 1 to 5. Higher score indicates worse outcome. The total MSIS physical score ranges from 20 to 100 points with lower points indicating better impact." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline visit & follow-up after treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
MSIS physical (new relapse)MSIS physical (after treatment of new relapse)
Single Arm58.556

[back to top]

ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) ADL Scores (Activities of Daily Living)

"Patient history of prior corticosteroid tolerability for the treatment of MS relapses. This will be determined based on patient completion of the ARMS survey at the baseline visit. Also, history of patients from the survey after treatment for the new relapse will be collected.~The ARMS questionnaire (assessing relapses in multiple sclerosis) was developed by a panel of expert MS nurses. Part one consists of 7 questions designed to assess relapse symptoms, impact on activities of daily living, and response to past treatment for MS relapses. Part two consists of 7 questions to evaluate treatment response in terms of relief from symptoms, functioning and tolerability.~ADL scores were calculated from Part 1 (new relapse), question 3 and Part 2 (after treatment of relapse), question 5 both specifically refer to ADL;~Scale: ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 9 Higher scores indicated better functioning/ improvement." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline visit & follow-up after treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
ADL (new relapse)ADL (after treatment of relapse)
Single Arm3.14.9

[back to top]

ARMS (Assessing Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis) PCS Scores (Partial Composite Scores)

"Patient history of prior corticosteroid tolerability for the treatment of MS relapses. This will be determined based on patient completion of the ARMS survey at the baseline visit. Also, patients completed the survey after treatment for the new relapse.~The ARMS questionnaire (assessing relapses in multiple sclerosis) was developed by a panel of expert MS nurses. Part one consists of 7 questions designed to assess relapse symptoms, impact on activities of daily living, and response to past treatment for MS relapses. Part two consists of 7 questions to evaluate treatment response in terms of relief from symptoms, functioning and tolerability.~PCS was computed based on the sum of the ADL and RSH questions. The PCS was computed separately for Part 1 (new relapse) and Part 2 (after relapse treatment) and summarized descriptively; Higher scores indicating better functioning/greater improvement. The PCS scores were on a scale of 0 to 20 units." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline visit & follow-up after treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS (New relapse)PCS (after treatment of relapse)
Single Arm7.79.2

[back to top] [back to top]

EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) Scores.

"This scaling score is obtained by performing a neurologic exam with specific attention to eight different neurologic functional systems: visual, pyramidal, cerebellar, bowel and bladder, cerebral, brainstem, sensory and other (10). The score is rated from zero (normal neurologic examination) to ten (death due to MS). This is the standard neurologic disability scale used in clinical trials for the evaluation of disability in patients with MS.~These scores were compared between pre and post phase using paired t-tests." (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: baseline and at follow-up

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
EDSS score (new relapse)EDSS score (after treatment of new relapse)
Single Arm3.53.0

[back to top]

GASE Scale Questionnaire (Generic Assessment of Side Effects)

"Patients who reported a history of poor corticosteroid tolerability will be placed on Acthar and GASE scale will be given to assess tolerability to Acthar.~We listed the number of times a symptom was reported and was attributable to the ACTHAR treatment" (NCT02258217)
Timeframe: 1 week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HeadacheDry MouthDizzinessTachycardia, palpitation or arrhythmiaBreathing problemsAbdominal painNauseaDiarrheaReduced AppetiteIncreased appetiteDifficulties with urinationSkin rash or itchingTendency to develop bruisesSweatingHot flashesFatigue, loss of energyInsomnia, sleeping problemsNightmares or abnormal dreamsBack painAgitationIrritabilityDepressed MoodAnxiety, fearfulnessFurther symptoms
Single Arm312114441421111282166318

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ)

A self and informant rating measure of perceived cognitive problems. Minimum of 0, maximum of 60. Higher scores indicates greater self-reported neuropsychological impairment. The difference in total score on the MSNQ from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Score (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients34.5
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients20.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II)

A measure of auditory/verbal episodic memory. Minimum of 0, maximum of 80. Higher score indicates better performance. The difference in total learning score on the CVLT-II from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Learning Score (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients46.6
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients51.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

A clinician assigned measure of disability specific to MS. Minimum of 0 (no disability), maximum of 10 (death due to MS). Higher scores indicate greater disability. The difference in total score on the EDSS from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Score (Median)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients3.0
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

A self-report measure of fatigue. 1 (no fatigue) to 9 (severe fatigue). The difference in total score on FSS from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Score (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients5.4
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

A measure of auditory processing speed and working memory. Minimum value of 0, maximum value of 60. Higher score indicates better performance. The difference in total correct on the PASAT from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Correct (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients40.1
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients47.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

A measure of visual processing speed and working memory. Minimum score of 0, Maximum score of 120. Higher scores indicate better performance. The difference in total correct responses on the SDMT from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Correct (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients44.6
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients58.5

[back to top]

Timed 25-foot Walk

An MS-specific measure of functional status walking speed. How many seconds does it take to walk 25 feet. Ceiling value of 300 seconds. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients6.7
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients5.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS)

A self-report, multiple choice inventory of depression. Minimum of 0, maximum of 21. Higher score indicates higher levels of depression. The difference in total score on the BDI-FS from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Score (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients5.0
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)

A measure of visual/spatial memory. Minimum of 0, maximum of 36. Higher score indicates better performance. The difference in total learning score on the BVMT-R from Day 0 to Day 90 were analyzed to address change in this outcome. (NCT02290444)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 90

InterventionTotal Learning Score (Mean)
Cognitively Relapsing Patients22.0
Stable Multiple Sclerosis Patients22.5

[back to top]

Quality of Life at 28 Weeks

Patient-reported quality of life as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at 28 weeks. The SF-36 is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient mental and physical health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. (NCT02315872)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
SF-36 MentalSF-36 Physical
ACTH39.5037.50
Placebo49.0045.00

[back to top]

Depression at 28 Weeks

Patient-reported depression as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) at 28 weeks. The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report multiple-choice inventory used as an indicator of the severity of depression. A higher score indicates a greater severity of depression. (NCT02315872)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
ACTH16.50
Placebo40.00

[back to top]

Sleepiness at 28 Weeks

Patient-reported daytime sleepiness as measure by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 28 weeks. The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Respondents are asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3), their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep while engaged in eight different activities. The ESS score (the sum of 8 item scores, 0-3) can range from 0 to 24. The higher the ESS score, the higher that person's average sleep propensity in daily life, or their 'daytime sleepiness'. (NCT02315872)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
ACTH11.00
Placebo7.00

[back to top]

Fatigue at 28 Weeks

Patient-reported levels of fatigue as measured by score on the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at 28 weeks. The full-length MFIS consists of 21 items. A higher score on the MFIS indicates a greater impact of fatigue on a patient's activities. The FSS is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders. Higher scores on each scale indicate a greater severity of fatigue. (NCT02315872)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
MFISFSS
ACTH56.5055.00
Placebo29.0040.00

[back to top]

Change in T2 Lesion Volume

The change in T2 lesion volume between baseline and one year MRI's will be calculated and compared between treatment groups. (NCT02446886)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmillimeters cubed (Mean)
One Time Treatment683.59
Monthly Treatments1092.08

[back to top]

Longitudinal Assessment of MWF

"Outcome measure: Longitudinal assessment of MWF (every 3 months) to determine the dynamics of myelin change over 12 months.~Method to assess lesion MWF: FAST-T2 is a multi-compartment T2 relaxometry MRI technique wherein the contribution of water associated with myelin and other tissue compartments is differentiated using T2 decay curve analysis. The relative contribution of the myelin water with respect to total water is represented as MWF. A higher MWF within a lesion reflects higher myelin content within that lesion.~For this analysis, MWF maps were reconstructed from FAST-T2 MRI data by using a multi-voxel nonlinear least-squares data-fitting algorithm with spatial smoothness constraints. MWF was calculated as the ratio of the myelin water signal to the total water signal within a voxel. Lesion MWF is an average of the voxels present within an individual lesion." (NCT02446886)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmyelin water fraction (Mean)
One Time Treatment1.7
Monthly Treatments-.2

[back to top]

Physical Disability as Measured by EDSS

"Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)~0 Normal neurological exam, no disability in any FS 1.0 No disability, minimal signs in one FS 1.5 No disability, minimal signs in more than one FS 2.0 Minimal disability in one FS 2.5 Mild disability in one FS or minimal disability in two FS 3.0 Moderate disability in one FS, or mild disability in three or four FS. No impairment to walking 3.5 Moderate disability in one FS and more than minimal disability in several others. No impairment to walking 4.0 Significant disability but self-sufficient and up and about some 12 hours a day. Able to walk without aid or rest for 500m 4.5 Significant disability but up and about much of the day, able to work a full day, may otherwise have some limitation of full activity or require minimal assistance. Able to walk without aid or rest for 300m~10.0 Death due to MS~A higher score means a worse outcome." (NCT02446886)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
One Time Treatment.5
Monthly Treatments1.1

[back to top]

Change in Myelin Water Fraction (MWF) Within New Enhancing Lesions Over the Course of 12 Months

"Primary outcome: The absolute change in lesion MWF (over our test-retest variability) between baseline and one year MRI's will be calculated and compared between treatment groups.~Method to assess lesion MWF: FAST-T2 is a multi-compartment T2 relaxometry MRI technique wherein the contribution of water associated with myelin and other tissue compartments is differentiated using T2 decay curve analysis. The relative contribution of the myelin water with respect to total water is represented as MWF. A higher MWF within a lesion reflects higher myelin content within that lesion.~For this analysis, MWF maps were reconstructed from FAST-T2 MRI data by using a multi-voxel nonlinear least-squares data-fitting algorithm with spatial smoothness constraints. MWF was calculated as the ratio of the myelin water signal to the total water signal within a voxel. Lesion MWF is an average of the voxels present within an individual lesion." (NCT02446886)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionmyelin water fraction (Mean)
One Time Treatment1.7
Monthly Treatments-0.20

[back to top]

Safety (Serious Adverse Events)

"Participants will be monitored for Serious Adverse Events, as follows (as described in ClinicalTrials.gov) Death, Life-threatening events, Hospitalization (initial or prolonged), Disability and events that requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage.~Other (non serious) events which were anticipated or unanticipated (as described in ClinicaTrials.gov) will be monitored.~ASSESSMENT: The subjects will be assessed at regular intervals through a questionnaire for Acthar related events, physician evaluation at clinical visits, and self reporting." (NCT02546492)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)2

[back to top]

Efficacy Outcome

composite of graft loss, death, decrease in eGFR>10%, and increase in proteinuria (NCT02546492)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Composite outcomeDeathDecreased GFR>10%Increased proteinuria
Efficacy Outcomes3111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Clinically significant changes in laboratory or physical examination findings are counted as adverse events. Descriptive statistics are collected for participants with:~death for any reason (all cause mortality)~treatment emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)~any non-serious treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)" (NCT02633046)
Timeframe: within 56 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathsSerious TEAEsNon-serious TEAEs
Acthar Gel01160

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%

(NCT02725177)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U2

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema

(NCT02725177)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity

The primary outcome was percentage of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single one and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks . (NCT02725177)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation

(NCT02725177)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement of Macular Edema

Clinically Significant Uveitic Macular Edema: Clinical Improvement of Macular Edema with OCT Documentation of central foveal thickness < 300 microns (NCT02764697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decrease in Central Foveal Thickness <300Decrease in central Fovea > 300 Microns
H.P. Acthar Subcutaneous Gel Injection05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eye With Uveitis of Anterior Chamber Cellularity Graded From 0-4 on a Likert Scale Determined by Slit Lamp Examination

standard assessment of uveitis activity. Scores were assessed using a Likert scale using 0 to 4, higher score reflects more cellularity. (NCT02769702)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline12 Weeks
Acthar 80 IU0.51.25

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in Eye With Uveitis of Anterior Chamber Protein Graded 0-4 on a Likert Scale Determined by Slit Lamp Evaluation

standard assessment of uveitis activity. Scores were assessed using a Likert scale using 0 to 4, higher score reflects more protein. (NCT02769702)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline12 Weeks
Acthar 80 IUNA1.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Patient-Reported General Health by Visit

"Participants rate their general health on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0=best general health and 100=worst general health.~A lower score indicates better general health." (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionmm (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled59.845.137.827.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Tender Joint Count by Visit

"The investigator counts the number of tender joints used to calculate the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR, DAS28)~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionCount of Tender Joints (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled14.77.75.73.9

[back to top]

Part 1: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) by Visit

"The ESR is the rate at which red blood cells (in whole blood that has not clotted) fall to the bottom of the tube over a period of one hour.~The clear liquid above the red blood cells is measured in millimeters after one hour (mm/hr).~The normal range for ESR results is 1-13 mm/hr for males and 1/20 mm/hr for females.~The ESR is a common test for inflammation and used to derive the DAS28.~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionmm/hr (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled43.635.430.624.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) by Visit

LDA is defined as DAS28 <3.2. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled01737163

[back to top]

Part 2: Patient-Reported General Health by Visit

"Participants rate their general health on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0=best general health and 100=worst general health.~A lower score indicates better general health." (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 to Week 24

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel13.518.819.617.921.3
Part 2: Placebo13.515.417.218.521.4

[back to top]

Part 2: Number of Participants Who Maintained Low Disease Activity by Visit

Low disease activity is defined as DAS28 <3.2. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
at Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel75534832
Part 2: Placebo77586147

[back to top]

Part 2: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) by Visit

"The ESR is the rate at which red blood cells (in whole blood that has not clotted) fall to the bottom of the tube over a period of one hour.~The clear liquid above the red blood cells is measured in millimeters after one hour (mm/hr).~The normal range for ESR results is 1-13 mm/hr for males and 1/20 mm/hr for females.~The ESR is a common test for inflammation and used to derive the DAS28.~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 to Week 24

,
Interventionmm/hr (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel40.315.817.717.523.1
Part 2: Placebo42.215.219.622.025.1

[back to top]

Part 1: Swollen Joint Count by Visit

"The investigator counts the number of swollen joints used to calculate the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR, DAS28)~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionCount of swollen joints (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled10.95.64.02.8

[back to top]

Part 1: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activities by Visit

The physician rates the participant's disease activity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0=very good and 100=very bad. Lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionmm (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled64.336.129.021.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain by Visit

Patients rate their pain on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=no pain and 100=pain as bad as it could be. Higher scores indicate more pain. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionmm (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 4at Week 8at Week 12
Part 1: All Participants Enrolled64.944.137.327.5

[back to top]

Part 2: Tender Joint Count by Visit

"The investigator counts the number of tender joints used to calculate the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR, DAS28)~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 to Week 24

,
InterventionCount of Tender Joints (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel13.51.41.61.52.4
Part 2: Placebo13.51.52.62.73.1

[back to top]

Part 2: Swollen Joint Count by Visit During Part 2

"The investigator counts the number of swollen joints used to calculate the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR/DAS28)~The DAS28 is a composite score derived from the following assessments:~Swollen Joint Count~Tender Joint Count~Patient's Global Health~Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate" (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 to Week 24

,
InterventionCount of swollen joints (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel9.70.91.10.91.5
Part 2: Placebo10.10.91.71.92.3

[back to top]

Part 2: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activities by Visit

The physician rates the participant's disease activity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0=very good and 100=very bad. Lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 24

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
at Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel12.913.312.415.2
Part 2: Placebo11.515.515.917.8

[back to top]

Part 2: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain by Visit

Patients rate their pain on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=no pain and 100=pain as bad as it could be. Higher scores indicate more pain. (NCT02919761)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 to Week 24

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
at Baselineat Week 12at Week 16at Week 20at Week 24
Part 2: Acthar Gel65.718.922.119.821.8
Part 2: Placebo62.817.021.620.022.1

[back to top]

Time of Application

Time of application of endoloop, stapler, Hem-o-lok and DS clip measured from introducing of instruments to cutting the base of appendix (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 120 min

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.195.50
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler19.87
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip63.90
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip63.77

[back to top]

Operative Time

Time of operative procedure (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 120 min.

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.46.0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler39.37
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip42.83
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip47.47

[back to top]

Intra-perative Complications

Complications that appear during operative procedure (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 120 min.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip0

[back to top]

Hospital Stay

Length of hospitalization (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.2.17
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler2.20
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip2.23
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip2.37

[back to top]

Postoperative Complications

Complications that appear after operative procedure (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip0

[back to top]

Overall Morbidity

Overall morbidity following the securing of the base of the appendix, defined as any adverse event occurring from the time of securing the base of the appendix until the 30th day. (NCT02941640)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Endoloop.0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Stapler0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Hem-o-lok Clip0
Laparoscopic Appendectomy. DS Clip0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least a 4 Point Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K)

The SLEDAI-2K is a modified version of a composite score based on the presence or absence of clinical signs, clinical symptoms, and immunologic laboratory results taken within 10 days of the evaluations. Each of the descriptors has a weighted score and the total score of SLEDAI-2K is the sum of all 24 descriptor scores. The total SLEDAI-2K score falls between 0 and 105, with higher scores representing higher disease activity. Decrease from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 16, Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 16Week 24
Acthar Gel4144
Placebo Gel4046

[back to top]

Mean Number of Swollen or Tender Joints on the 28-Joint Count

The 28 Joint Count includes assessment of swelling and tenderness in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints and knees. The investigator counts how many of the 28 joints are swollen or tender at the given week. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: at Baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

,
InterventionJoints (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 16
Acthar Gel8.24.22.92.31.9
Placebo Gel7.24.93.82.92.8

[back to top]

Mean Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Score- Activity (CLASI) Total Activity Score

The CLASI total activity score reflects ongoing inflammation that can be treated, with points given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Mild, moderate, and severe disease correspond with CLASI activity score ranges of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity, lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 16
Acthar Gel7.95.65.04.03.4
Placebo Gel7.15.85.04.53.8

[back to top]

British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG 2004)

"BILAG records disease activity occurring over the past 4 weeks, and is used to determine whether different course of treatment is required. The BILAG-2004 index covers 97 signs/symptoms across 9 organ systems. Each question is answered as 0-not present, 1-improving, 2-same, 3-worse, or 4-new.~The BILAG-2004 index categorizes disease activity in each organ system into five different levels from A to E. Grade A represents very active disease, Grade B represents moderate disease activity, Grade C indicates mild stable disease, and grade D implies no disease activity, but suggests the organ system had previously been affected. Grade E indicates no current or previous disease activity. A score is applied to each grade of each organ system using coding scheme of A=12, B=8, C=1, and D/E=0 and is summarized as a total score ranging 0-108. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity." (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16Week 24
Acthar Gel18.07.76.9
Placebo Gel18.29.78.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Severe Flare, Based on the SELENA Flare Index (SFI) at Week 16

Among some adults, having a period of SLE symptoms-called flares-may happen every so often, sometimes even years apart, and go away at other times-called remission. The SFI categorizes SLE flares as mild, moderate or severe. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo Gel3
Acthar Gel0

[back to top]

Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)

PGA is a 100 mm visual analogue scale where higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16Week 24
Acthar Gel60.630.225.5
Placebo Gel58.833.226.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decrease in Prednisone Dose to < 7.5 mg/Day at Week 20 and Week 24

(NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 20, Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 20Week 24
Acthar Gel34
Placebo Gel56

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Remission

Complete (proteinuria reduction <500mg/24h) or partial (urinary protein excretion (P/C) <3.0 g/g (with at least 50% reduction versus baseline) in at least two consecutive visits) remission. (NCT03025828)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
complete remissionpartial remission
Acthar04

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

GFR measures kidney function. (NCT03025828)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

InterventionmL/min (Median)
baseline12 months
Acthar90.580.5

[back to top]

Change in Serum Albumin

Change in serum albumin from baseline (NCT03025828)
Timeframe: baseline 6 months, 12 months

Interventiong/dl (Median)
baseline and 6 monthsbaseline and 12 months
Acthar3.03.65

[back to top]

Change in Proteinuria

Change in proteinuria at baseline versus after 12 months of treatment as measured by urine protein/creatinine ratio (NCT03025828)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

Interventionratio (Median)
baseline12 months
Acthar4.561.36

[back to top]

Change in CD4+CD25+CD127low T Regulatory Cells/CD4+ T Cell Ratio

blood levels - one single cell subset identified by different markers (NCT03025828)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

Interventionratio (Median)
Baseline12 Months
Acthar0.040.12

[back to top]

Treatment Period: Spirometry (%)

Spirometry (meaning the measuring of breath) is the most common of the lung function tests. It measures how much air can be inhaled [Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)] and exhaled [(Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)]. (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36

,
Interventionliters (Mean)
FVC at BaselineFVC at Week 36FEV1 at BaselineFEV1 at Week 36
Arm A: RTP Acthar Gel85.061.479.359.1
Arm B: RTP Placebo82.163.877.854.3

[back to top]

Treatment Period: Scores on a Scale for Telephone-administered Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R)

"The ALSFRS-R is a validated questionnaire-based scale used extensively as a primary outcome measure in ALS clinical trials and is considered a predictor of survival.~ALSFRS-R is a 12-item scale that measures 4 domains relevant for ALS (gross motor, fine motor, bulbar and respiratory)~A trained, independent rater calls each participant (or the caregiver) to administer the questionnaire. The 12 functions are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with a highest possible (summed) score of 48. Higher scores represent better function." (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 36
Arm A: RTP Acthar Gel34.726.4
Arm B: RTP Placebo34.330.8

[back to top]

Treatment Period: Scores on a Scale for Investigator-administered ALSFRS-R

"The ALSFRS-R is a 12-item scale evaluating 4 domains relevant to ALS (gross motor, fine motor, bulbar and respiratory).~The trained investigator (or designee) administers the ALSFRS-R questionnaire in person with the participant (or caregiver). The 12 functions are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with a highest possible (summed) score of 48. Higher scores represent better function." (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 36
Arm A: RTP Acthar Gel35.828.0
Arm B: RTP Placebo35.430.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event During the Treatment Period

Serious adverse events, non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events, and all-cause mortality are collected until the participant no longer participates in the study Clinically significant changes in safety measures are recorded as adverse events. (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: by the end of the treatment period (within 36 Weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsNon-serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeath
Arm A: RTP Acthar Gel13742
Arm B: RTP Placebo6403

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event by the End of the Trial in the OLE Period

Serious adverse events, non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events, and all-cause mortality are collected until the participant no longer participates in the study (estimated about 1 year for participants leaving after the treatment period, and two years for participants who participate also in the open label extension). Clinically significant changes in safety measures are recorded as adverse events. (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: by the time of database lock (within 84 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsNon-serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Arm C: OLE Acthar Gel-Acthar Gel420
Arm D: OLE Placebo-Acthar Gel27

[back to top]

Extension Period: Scores on a Scale for Investigator-administered ALSFRS-R

"The ALSFRS-R is a 12-item scale evaluating 4 domains relevant to ALS (gross motor, fine motor, bulbar and respiratory).~The trained investigator (or designee) administers the ALSFRS-R questionnaire in person with the participant (or caregiver). The 12 functions are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with a highest possible score of 48. Higher scores represent better function." (NCT03068754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 84

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 84
Arm C: OLE Acthar Gel-Acthar Gel36.827.4
Arm D: OLE Placebo-Acthar Gel39.621.5

[back to top]

Score on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at Baseline and Day 42

The EDSS is a 10-point assessment of neurological impairment/disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, ranging from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). EDSS is rated by a person who only collects outcome measures, and has no knowledge of the treatment received. (NCT03126760)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 42

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 42
Acthar Gel3.862.92
Placebo3.853.62

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

goldmann tonometry used by qualified technician with fluorescein staining (NCT03287635)
Timeframe: 12 weeks measuring change from baseline to final

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Acthar Gel 80 U/ml-1.65

[back to top]

Dry Eye Comfort Questionnaire, SANDE

"Subjects will be asked to subjectively rate their eye dryness at Visit 1,2 and 3. Subjects will be instructed to rate eye dryness using the scale below. The total length of the line from no dryness to maximal dryness is 100 mm. The length of the line between the no dryness starting point and the first point at which the subject mark crosses the line will be measured in mm. This assessment is a general assessment of the change of both eyes of dryness measure from baseline to final study visit. The measure of discomfort was for the instantaneous measurement at the time of the specific visit." (NCT03287635)
Timeframe: 12 weeks total. Measure is change on SANDE scale (0 is no dryness and 100mm is maximal dryness) from baseline to final value. Higher values reflect greater amounts of subjective dryness.

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Acthar Gel 80 U/ml44.77

[back to top]

1. Conjunctival Staining With Lissamine Green

Change in Conjunctival staining with lissamine green. (NCT03287635)
Timeframe: 12 weeks total. Measure is change from baseline to final,

Interventionstaining spots on conjunctiva (Mean)
Acthar Gel 80 U/ml-173.33

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the KSQ (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48

"King's sarcoidosis questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health) is a 28-item questionnaire for participants to indicate the status of their sarcoidosis and treatment. Each item was answered on a 7-point scale where 1 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time and 7 means the participant does not experience the symptom at all. Higher scores indicate improvement, and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points~Unchanged (0) based on a change of >- 4 to < 4 points~Worse (-1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE8266
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE8593

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the DLCO, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48

"The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measures the ability of the lungs to transfer gas from inhaled air to the red blood cells in the blood. Participants are asked to fully inhale a low concentration of carbon monoxide and an inert tracer gas. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, DLCO was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) [≥ 5% absolute change]~Unchanged (0) [>- 5% to < 5% absolute change],~Worse (-1) [≤ -5% absolute change]~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE9346
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE6685

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on HRCT at Week 48

"High-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) is a type of computed tomography (CT) with specific techniques to enhance image resolution. It is used in the diagnosis of various health problems, most commonly for lung disease. These images show cross sections (slices) through the lungs. HRCT imaging was evaluated by the investigator/radiologist and the central reader to determine if the condition is improved (+1), unchanged (0), or worse (-1). An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE11317
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE61324

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FVC, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48

"Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a pulmonary function test parameter that indicates the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It's measured by spirometry, which is a common breathing test to check lung function. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, FVC was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) [≥ 5% absolute change]~Unchanged (0) [>- 5% to < 5% absolute change], or~Worse (-1) [≤ -5% absolute change]~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE21316
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE61135

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 48

"Corticosteroids are first line treatment for sarcoidosis. Concerns of corticosteroid toxicity led to efforts to taper dose sooner. Participants were clinically evaluated at each visit by investigator and categorized by their condition; dose was tapered using algorithm to take them off prednisone using incremental doses of 40,30,20,10,7.5,5,2.5,0 mg, as explained with each category below.~Improved: When condition improved, reduce dose by 1 level~Unchanged:~When stable condition without toxicity: At first stable visit they continue same dose; at second stable visit, reduce dose by 1 level~When stable condition with toxicity: toxicity is treated; reduce dose by 1 level~Deteriorate: When worsening condition, increase dose by 1 or 2 levels but not >40mg/day~Dose tapering was done based on the participant's clinical condition.~Category Missing Assessment indicates participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE15502
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE19501

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24

"King's sarcoidosis questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health) is a 28-item questionnaire for participants to indicate the status of their sarcoidosis and treatment. Each item was answered on a 7-point scale where 1 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time and 7 means the participant does not experience the symptom at all. Higher scores indicate improvement, and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points~Unchanged (0) based on a change of >- 4 to < 4 points~Worse (-1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE113103
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE7894

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Fatigue Assessment Score (FAS), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24

"The fatigue assessment score (FAS) is a 10-item checklist for participants to indicate the level of their fatigue. Each item was answered on a 5-point scale where 1 means the participant does not experience the symptom all and 5 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time. Lower scores indicate improvement (less fatigue) and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points~Unchanged (0) based on a change of >- 4 to < 4 points~Worse (-1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE61263
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE61174

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24

"The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measures the ability of the lungs to transfer gas from inhaled air to the red blood cells in the blood. Participants are asked to fully inhale a low concentration of carbon monoxide and an inert tracer gas. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, DLCO was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) [≥ 5% absolute change]~Unchanged (0) [>- 5% to < 5% absolute change],~Worse (-1) [≤ -5% absolute change]~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE51174
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE41176

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on High Resolution Computer Tomography (HRCT) at Week 24

"High-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) is a type of computed tomography (CT) with specific techniques to enhance image resolution. It is used in the diagnosis of various health problems, most commonly for lung disease. These images show cross sections (slices) through the lungs. HRCT imaging was evaluated by the investigator/radiologist and the central reader to determine if the condition is improved (+1), unchanged (0), or worse (-1). An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE22203
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE11845

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24

"Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a pulmonary function test parameter that indicates the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It's measured by spirometry, which is a common breathing test to check lung function. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, FVC was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) [≥ 5% absolute change]~Unchanged (0) [>- 5% to < 5% absolute change], or~Worse (-1) [≤ -5% absolute change]~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE101214
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE71236

[back to top]

DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 24

"Corticosteroids are first line treatment for sarcoidosis. Concerns of corticosteroid toxicity led to efforts to taper dose sooner. Participants were clinically evaluated at each visit by investigator and categorized by their condition; dose was tapered using algorithm to take them off prednisone using incremental doses of 40,30,20,10,7.5,5,2.5,0 mg, as explained with each category below.~Improved: When condition improved, reduce dose by 1 level~Unchanged:~When stable condition without toxicity: At first stable visit they continue same dose; at second stable visit, reduce dose by 1 level~When stable condition with toxicity: toxicity is treated; reduce dose by 1 level~Deteriorate: When worsening condition, increase dose by 1 or 2 levels but not >40mg/day~Dose tapering was done based on the participant's clinical condition.~Category Missing Assessment indicates participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE17802
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE21403

[back to top]

OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FAS, a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48

"The fatigue assessment score (FAS) is a 10-item checklist for participants to indicate the level of their fatigue. Each item was answered on a 5-point scale where 1 means the participant does not experience the symptom all and 5 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time. Lower scores indicate improvement (less fatigue) and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is:~Improved (+1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points~Unchanged (0) based on a change of >- 4 to < 4 points~Worse (-1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points~An additional category Missing Assessment indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure." (NCT03320070)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ImprovedUnchangedDeteriorateMissing Assessment
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE7546
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE41353

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Improved on the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Scale [Using the Symptom Bother Module at Week 12]

A 12-point score reduction on the 100-point symptom bother module indicates a clinically important reduction of bothersome dry eye symptoms. (NCT04169061)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Participants17

[back to top]

Percentage of Breast Biopsy Patients Whose Clip Migrated Greater Than 10mm From the Biopsy Site.

(NCT04398537)
Timeframe: baseline through 1 hour (post biopsy mammogram/procedure)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5mm Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus46
no Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus44

[back to top]

Number of Breast Biopsy Patients Whose Clip Migrated Greater Than 10mm From the Biopsy Site.

This number of participants will be counted if their clip migrated more than 10mm from the biopsy site. (NCT04398537)
Timeframe: baseline through 1 hour (post biopsy mammogram/procedure)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5mm Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus46
no Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus44

[back to top]

Average Distance of Clip Migration for the Arm That Received 5mm Retraction.

(NCT04398537)
Timeframe: baseline through 1 hour (post biopsy mammogram/procedure)

Interventionmm (Mean)
5mm Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus12.1

[back to top]

Average Distance of Clip Migration for the Arm That Did Not Receive Clip Retraction.

(NCT04398537)
Timeframe: baseline through 1 hour (post biopsy mammogram/procedure)

Interventionmm (Mean)
no Retraction of Clip Deployment Apparatus9.8

[back to top]