Page last updated: 2024-12-07
sulperazone
Description
Research Excerpts
Clinical Trials
Roles
Classes
Pathways
Study Profile
Bioassays
Related Drugs
Related Conditions
Protein Interactions
Research Growth
Market Indicators
Description
sulperazone: combination of above two cpds [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]
Cross-References
ID Source | ID |
---|---|
PubMed CID | 130312 |
SCHEMBL ID | 1649819 |
MeSH ID | M0161826 |
Synonyms (11)
Synonym |
---|
5-thia-1-azabicyclo(4.2.0)oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, 7-(((((4-ethyl-2,3-dioxo-1-piperazinyl)carbonyl)amino)(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl)amino)-3-(((1-methyl-1h-tetrazol-5-yl)thio)methyl)-8-oxo-, (6r-(6alpha,7beta(r*)))-, mixt. with (2s-cis)-3,3-dimethyl-7-ox |
sulperazone |
92739-15-6 |
sulperazon |
cefoperasone-sulbactam mixt. |
bacamp |
jincetam |
cefactam |
SCHEMBL1649819 |
(2s,5r)-3,3-dimethyl-4,4,7-trioxo-4lambda6-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid;(6r,7r)-7-[[2-[(4-ethyl-2,3-dioxopiperazine-1-carbonyl)amino]-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl]amino]-3-[(1-methyltetrazol-5-yl)sulfanylmethyl]-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo |
(2s,5r)-3,3-dimethyl-4,4,7-trioxo-4lambda6-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid;(6r,7r)-7-[[(2r)-2-[(4-ethyl-2,3-dioxopiperazine-1-carbonyl)amino]-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl]amino]-3-[(1-methyltetrazol-5-yl)sulfanylmethyl]-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabi |
Research Excerpts
Overview
Sulperazone is concluded to be a useful antibiotic for treating complicated UTI induced by beta-lactamase production organisms.
Excerpt | Reference | Relevance |
---|---|---|
"Sulperazone is concluded to be a useful antibiotic for treating complicated UTI induced by beta-lactamase production organisms from the point of microbiology and safety." | ( [Microorganisms isolated from urinary tract infection and their beta-lactamase production and evaluation of clinical efficacy of sulperazone]. Araki, T; Chigusa, I; Hayashi, N; Kawahara, S; Kawamura, J; Okabe, S; Saito, K; Suzuki, I; Suzuki, N; Takeno, K, 1988) | 1.2 |
Toxicity
Excerpt | Reference | Relevance |
---|---|---|
" Mild or moderate side effect (allergic reaction including rash etc." | ( [Efficacy and safety of sulbactam/cefoperazone for hepato-biliary infections]. Amako, Y; Fujisaki, M; Hirano, M; Ishii, J; Itakura, M; Iwasa, T; Kako, M; Koyama, M; Mitamura, K; Nakaya, S; Nishio, T; Ohswawa, N; Ohyama, R; Okuda, K; Oohira, S; Saito, H; Shinagawa, N; Sugiyama, A; Takashima, S; Takeda, S; Ueda, M; Yamada, M; Yasuda, Y; Zeze, F, 1997) | 0.3 |
Pharmacokinetics
Excerpt | Reference | Relevance |
---|---|---|
" The method was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study of Sulperazon injection in six hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) patients." | ( Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of cefoperazone and sulbactam in plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Guo, B; Shi, Y; Wang, M; Yu, J; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhou, Y, 2010) | 0.36 |
Compound-Compound Interactions
Excerpt | Reference | Relevance |
---|---|---|
"In the treatment of severe infections complicated to blood dyscrasia, the efficacy and usefulness of fosfomycin (FOM) in combination with sulbactam (SBT)/cefoperazone (CPZ) were compared between patients receiving FOM in the first followed by SBT/CPZ (Group A) and those receiving both drugs simultaneously (Group B)." | ( [Clinical efficacy of fosfomycin in combination with sulbactam/cefoperazone in the treatment of severe infections complicated to blood dyscrasia. Working Group of Kanto Combination Therapy for FOM + SBT/CPZ]. Ann, E; Bessho, M; Dan, K; Egashira, M; Fukuda, M; Hirai, H; Hirasawa, A; Hirashima, K; Hoshino, T; Hosoya, N; Ikeda, Y; Karasawa, M; Kawai, N; Kitamura, K; Kizaki, M; Miura, Y; Miyazawa, K; Nagasu, M; Naruse, T; Noguchi, M; Ohmine, K; Oshimi, K; Sugai, M; Takagi, S; Toyama, K, 1998) | 0.3 |
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]
Research
Studies (31)
Timeframe | Studies, This Drug (%) | All Drugs % |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 1 (3.23) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 16 (51.61) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 10 (32.26) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 2 (6.45) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (6.45) | 2.80 |
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023] |
Market Indicators
Research Demand Index: 71.32
According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.
| This Compound (71.32) All Compounds (24.57) |
Study Types
Publication Type | This drug (%) | All Drugs (%) |
---|---|---|
Trials | 9 (28.13%) | 5.53% |
Reviews | 2 (6.25%) | 6.00% |
Case Studies | 2 (6.25%) | 4.05% |
Observational | 0 (0.00%) | 0.25% |
Other | 19 (59.38%) | 84.16% |
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023] |
Clinical Trials (10)
Trial Overview
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Randomized, Single-dose, Two-way Crossover Study to Evaluate Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium Combination (1/1 g/Vial) After Intravenous Infusion of 1 g Cefoperazone Sodium and 1 g Sulbactam Sodium in Health [NCT05654090] | Phase 4 | 14 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-08-25 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Osteomyelitis Treated With Intravenous Antibiotics Versus Intravenous Antibiotics With an Early Switch to Oral Antibiotics [NCT02099240] | Early Phase 1 | 11 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-03-06 | Terminated(stopped due to Not enough patient enrollment and lack of staffing) | ||
Antibiotics Treatment of Cholangitis Post-Kasai Portoenterostomy [NCT04370145] | Phase 4 | 160 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-05-01 | Completed | ||
Preventive Effect of Prophylactic Oral Antibiotics Against Cholangitis After Kasai Portoenterostomy in Biliary Atresia: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05925309] | 356 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-07-01 | Recruiting | |||
Epidemiological Study on Drug-induced Coagulation Disorder Caused by Cefoperazone Sulbactam Sodium and Construction of Prediction Model [NCT05535309] | 8,000 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2021-11-02 | Active, not recruiting | |||
Cefoperazone/Sulbactam In The Treatment Of Serious Intra-Abdominal And Hepatobiliary Infections In Slovakia. An Open, Prospective, Non-Comparative Study. [NCT00463762] | 0 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2007-05-31 | Withdrawn | |||
Escalade or Deseacalade Antibiotic Use in Severe Acute Pancreatitis [NCT01992198] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2012-07-31 | Recruiting | ||
Phase Ⅱ Study on Ceftazidime Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium for Injection(2:1) for Treatment of Respiratory and Urinary System Infection [NCT01601093] | Phase 2 | 288 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2011-11-30 | Suspended(stopped due to other project got priority) | ||
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicentre Phase Iv Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Magnex (Cefoperazone-Sulbactam) In Comparison With Ceftazidime Plus Amikacin And Metronidazole In The Treatment Of Intra-Abdominal Infections [NCT00360607] | Phase 4 | 307 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial to Treat Intra-abdominal Infection Preventively After Pancreatic Surgery Based on Serum Lactate Changes [NCT05052619] | 297 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-07-01 | Recruiting | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |