Page last updated: 2024-11-12

interferons

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

euglobal G1: inhibits Epstein-Barr virus activation; isolated from Eucalyptus grandis; structure given in first source [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID10068739
CHEMBL ID1718912
SCHEMBL ID96089
MeSH IDM0011491

Synonyms (7)

Synonym
euglobal g1
MLS002473165
smr001397257
NCGC00247477-01
CHEMBL1718912
SCHEMBL96089
(1r,2s,11r,13s)-6,8-dihydroxy-2,14,14-trimethyl-5-(3-methylbutanoyl)-3-oxatetracyclo[11.1.1.02,11.04,9]pentadeca-4,6,8-triene-7-carbaldehyde
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (4)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.34890.004110.890331.5287AID504467
67.9K proteinVaccinia virusPotency11.90470.00018.4406100.0000AID720579; AID720580
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency79.43280.006026.168889.1251AID540317
flap endonuclease 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.133725.412989.1251AID588795
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Bioassays (14)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID607446Antileishmanial activity against Leishmania donovani promastigotes2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 21, Issue:14
Quantitative structure-activity relationship study of phloroglucinol-terpene adducts as anti-leishmanial agents.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (9)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (11.11)18.2507
2000's3 (33.33)29.6817
2010's4 (44.44)24.3611
2020's1 (11.11)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 105.16

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index105.16 (24.57)
Research Supply Index2.30 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.56 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index186.01 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.01 (0.95)

This Compound (105.16)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other9 (100.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (1089)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Study on the Optimal Treatment for Poor Efficacy of Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [NCT03733652]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-15Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Physician/Patient Choice of Either High Dose Interferon or Ipilimumab to MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) in Patients With High Risk Resected Melanoma [NCT02506153]Phase 31,345 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-10Active, not recruiting
A Randomised, Parallel Group 2:1 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of FP-1201-lyo (Interferon Beta-1a) and Placebo in the Prevention of Multi-Organ Failure on Patients Surviving Open Surgery for a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [NCT03119701]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-18Terminated(stopped due to IDMC recommendation. Unexpectedly high use of concomitant corticosteroid treatment.)
A Phase 2 Study of Telaprevir (VX-950) in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®), and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Who Have Not Achieved Sustained Viral Response With a Prior Course of Interferon Based Therapy [NCT00420784]Phase 2465 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Side Effects of Disease Modifying Therapy With Subcutaneous Interferon-b1b in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01122056]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Nonrandomized, Single-center, Phase I Trial of Pretreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) With Nilotinib in Combination With Low Dose Interferon-alpha (IFN) - NICOLI Study - [NCT01220648]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Randomized Study Comparing Imatinib And Imatinib/Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2B in Newly Diagnosed Non-high Risk Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Complete Hematological Remission After Imatinib Induction Therapy [NCT01227356]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Postmarketing Surveillance Study on the Extent to Which Patient Compliance is Influenced by Use of a Variable Titration Regimen at the Start of Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis With Interferon Beta 1a (Rebif®) [NCT01142492]403 participants (Actual)Observational2005-01-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of VX-950 in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®), With Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Who Have Not Received Prior Treatment [NCT00336479]Phase 2263 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
HYMN: A Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial Comparing Hyperthermia Plus Mitomycin to a Second Course of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin or Standard Therapy in Patients With Recurrence of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Induction or Maintenance Bac [NCT01094964]Phase 3242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Recruiting
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Arm Study Comparing Low- and High-Dose Alemtuzumab and High-Dose Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Early, Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00050778]Phase 2334 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Airway Intervention Registry (AIR) Extension: Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis [NCT03465280]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2018-04-01Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg Alone or in Combination With High Dose Interferon-Alpha in Advanced Melanoma [NCT01708941]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Ipilimumab Anti-CTLA4 Therapy Versus High-Dose Interferon a-2b for Resected High-Risk Melanoma [NCT01274338]Phase 31,673 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-25Active, not recruiting
"SWiss Atorvastatin and Interferon-Beta 1b Trial In Multiple Sclerosis - Follow up Study (SWABIMS Follow Up-study)" [NCT01111656]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Alpha Interferon-2A of Blausiegel Trade and Industry the Compared the Product Roferon A, of Laboratory of Roche [NCT01228422]24 participants (Anticipated)Observational2009-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of IFN-alfacon1 (INFERGEN) in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients Presenting With Influenza-like Illnesses Due to the Pandemic 2009 Swine Origin Influenza A Virus (S-OIV) H1N1 and Other Circulating Infl [NCT01227798]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Clinical Controlled Study to Optimize the Therapeutic Pathway of Peginterferon Alfa-2b Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Based on IFNA2p.Ala120Thr /ISGs Gene Spectrum. [NCT03771677]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Recruiting
An Open Label Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Interferon-B-1a and Oral Doxycycline in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) [NCT00246324]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Study of Immunological Activity After Personalized Immunomodulatory Therapy Regulating the Th17 Pathway in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy [NCT05941845]Phase 25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-24Not yet recruiting
Pharmaco-immunological Study of Interferon-alpha and Metronomic Cyclophosphamide Association in Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT02838342]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-19Completed
Nordic Randomized Phase III Trial of Two Different Durations of Adjuvant Therapy With Intermediate-dose Interferon Alfa-2b in Patients With High-risk Melanoma [NCT01259934]Phase 3855 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-11-30Completed
Pilot Study of First Line Combination Treatment With Low Dose Pegylated Interferon and Entecavir in Treatment-naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. [NCT01589952]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
Vumerity (Diroximel Fumarate) Prospective MS Pregnancy Exposure Registry [NCT05658497]908 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-10-27Recruiting
Ribavirin Dose Optimization for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Pilot Study [NCT01289496]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Lambda vs. Placebo in Subjects Infected With COVID-19 [NCT04343976]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-22Terminated(stopped due to Unable to meet enrollment goal, lack of funding.)
A RANDOMIZED PHASE 2/3 TRIAL OF SCH 54031 PEG12000 INTERFERON ALFA-2b (PEG INTRON, SCH 54031) VS. INTRON A (SCH 30500) IN SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CML (PROTOCOL NOS. C/I98-026) [NCT03547154]Phase 2/Phase 3344 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-10-22Terminated
Phase III Trial of High Dose Interferon Alfa 2-b Versus Cisplatin, Vinblastine, DTIC Plus IL-2 and Interferon in Patients With High Risk Melanoma [NCT00006237]Phase 3432 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis (ATIOM) [NCT05535764]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-23Recruiting
The Benefit/Risk Profile of Pegylated Proline-Interferon Alpha-2b (AOP2014) Added to the Best Available Strategy Based on Phlebotomies in Low-risk Patients With Polycythemia Vera (PV). The Low-PV Randomized Trial [NCT03003325]Phase 2127 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-02Completed
Phase 1 Study to Determine the Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Secreting Interferon Beta in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer [NCT02530047]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-16Completed
Role of Pegylated Interferon in Combination With Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) to Cure Hepatitis C As Soon As Possible (ASAP) - Hepatitis C [ASAP-C] [NCT03480932]Phase 2/Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Completed
Single Arm Salvage Therapy With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for Patients With High Risk Polycythemia Vera or High Risk Essential Thrombocythemia Who Are Either Hydroxyurea Resistant or Intolerant or Have Had Abdominal Vein Thrombosis [NCT01259817]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Real-World Betaseron® Outcomes Study (ROBUST): A Twelve-month, US Prospective, Observational, Open-label, Single-arm, Multi-center Outcomes Study of Interferon β-1b (Betaseron®) Given Every Other Day for Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01158183]226 participants (Actual)Observational2007-07-31Completed
REsPonse to Interferon-Alpha in InterfeRon-β Neutralizing Antibody Positive Multiple Sclerosis Patients [NCT01171209]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Open-Label Rater-Blind Randomized Multi-Center Parallel-Arm Active- Comparator Study to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of Ofatumumab 20mg SC Monthly vs. First Line DMT - Physician's Choice in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed RMS [NCT04788615]Phase 3186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-23Recruiting
Phase II Study Incorporating Pegylated Interferon In the Treatment For Children With High-Risk Melanoma [NCT00539591]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-09Active, not recruiting
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in a Multicenter, Randomized,Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a (BIIB017) in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01337427]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was not feasible to conduct in the US and abroad.)
A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Adults (ACTT-3) [NCT04492475]Phase 3969 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-05Completed
The Short-term Effect of Immunomodulatory Treatment With Interferon Beta-1b (Betaferon) on Fatigue and Depression in First-time Treated Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis. [NCT01354665]567 participants (Actual)Observational2010-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Assess Adherence to Treatment for patIeNts With RMS Who Are Prescribed Subcutaneous (sc) Interferon Beta-1a (MAIN-MS) [NCT02921035]594 participants (Actual)Observational2016-06-30Completed
Comparison of Methotrexate Versus Interferon-alfa 2b on Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Life in Patients With Primary Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas [NCT02323659]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-01Terminated(stopped due to Slow recruitment)
A Pilot Study to Determine the Feasibility of Conventional Induction Chemotherapy Followed by G-CSF Mobilized Donor Leukocyte Infusion (DLI) and IFN-α (IFN-DLI) for Relapsed Acute Leukemia After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. [NCT02331706]Early Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Pegylated Interferon Alone or in Combination With Ezetimibe for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis D [NCT03105310]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Active, not recruiting
The Utility of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in TB-HIV Co-infected Children [NCT00604617]564 participants (Actual)Observational2009-01-26Completed
Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Boceprevir, in Combination With Peg-Interferon Alfa and Ribavirin, in Patients With HCV/HIV Co-infection Who Have Failed to a Previous Therapy With Peg-Interferon/Ribavirin [NCT01335529]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Combination Treatment of Nucleoside (Acid)Analogue (NAs) and Pegylated Interferon α-2b for NAs Treated, Hepatitis B Related, Compensatory Cirrhosis Patients With Low Level Hepatitis b Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) [NCT03969017]Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-17Recruiting
Clinical Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Drug Interferon Beta-1a Produced By Laboratorio Quimico Farmaceutico Bergamo Compared To Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif - Merck Serono) In Healthy Subjects [NCT01074593]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Anti-Coronavirus Therapies to Prevent Progression of COVID-19, a Randomized Trial [NCT04324463]Phase 36,667 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-21Active, not recruiting
Role of Interferon-gamma 1-b (IFN-γ) on Cells of the Innate Immune System: Functional, Biochemical and Gene Expression Studies in Patients With Chronic Granulomatous Disease [NCT03548818]9 participants (Actual)Observational2018-05-16Completed
The Curative Effect and Security of Interferon Combined Resveratrol on HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients - a Multi-center, Random, Control, Open Clinical Trial. [NCT03546530]228 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Completed
Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Treatments to Reduce the Risk of Worsening in Individuals With COVID-19 With Risk Factors (COVERAGE France) [NCT04356495]Phase 2/Phase 3412 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-29Completed
Boceprevir Treatment in Liver Pre-transplant HCV Patients [NCT02160080]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of γIFN Treatment in Friedreich Ataxia [NCT03888664]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-26Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Unblinded, Phase III Study Assessing the Loss of HbsAg at W96 After a 48-week Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B (HbeAg Negative) Under Treatment and Responders (Undetectable Viral Load) to a Nucl [NCT01172392]Phase 3185 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Active, not recruiting
"Phase II Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and the Safety of a Combination of Nilotinib Plus Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a for de Novo Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients" [NCT01294618]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of BAY 43-9006 With or Without Low Dose Interferon in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00126594]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Post-Authorization Observational Study to Evaluate Cognition and Fatigue in RRMS Patients Treated With Rebif [NCT01075880]300 participants (Actual)Observational2009-05-31Completed
A Multicentre, Single Arm, Open-Label, Phase IIIB Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antigenicity of Rebif® (Interferon-beta-1a) in Subjects With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00110396]Phase 3260 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00083889]Phase 3750 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Phase IV, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Study of Rebif® 44 mcg Administered Three Times Per Week by Subcutaneous Injection Compared With Copaxone® 20 mg Administered Daily by Subcutaneous Injection in the Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sc [NCT00078338]Phase 4764 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-16Completed
Pilot Study: Single Arm, Multi-site, Open-label Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Peg-IFN-a2b in Decreasing the Levels of Cell-associated Integrated Viral DNA in HIV Chronic Infection [NCT01935089]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-07Completed
Phase I Trial of Intratumoral Injection of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Expressing Human Interferon Beta in Patients With Sorafenib Refractory/Intolerant Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumors With Liver Predominant Locally Advanced/Metastatic Dise [NCT01628640]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Three-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Interferon Alfa Alone, CCI-779 Alone, And The Combination Of Interferon Alfa And CCI-779 In First-Line Poor-Prognosis Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. [NCT00065468]Phase 3626 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
PROTECT - Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b and Ribavirin After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Efficacy and Safety in Hepatitis C Recurrence Therapy [NCT00378599]Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Sequential High-Dose Melphalan and Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Rescue, Interferon/Thalidomide and Pamidronate for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00004088]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-04-13Completed
Phase II Trial of Atragen and Interferon Alfa-2b in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00003656]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Rebif® New Formulation in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in an Australian Clinical Setting [NCT01101776]49 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
A Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Boceprevir in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Who Failed Prior Treatment With Peginterferon/Ribavirin [NCT00708500]Phase 3404 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Comparative Pharmacokinetic Profile of Interferon Beta-1a (Bioferon®) Administered as Single i.v. Doses in HSA-free Formulation and HSA+ Solution and as Multiple s.c. Doses in Healthy Subjects [NCT02517788]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Randomized, Multi-Center, Phase IV, Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Peg-Interferon Alpha-2a (40 kD) With Ribavirin Combined Therapy for 48 or 72 Weeks of Treatment and 24 Weeks of Follow-Up in Patients With Chronic Hepatiti [NCT02761629]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Phase 2a Study Evaluating a Chemokine-Modulatory Regimen in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver [NCT03403634]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-19Completed
Treatment of COVID-19 by Nebulization of Inteferon Beta 1b Efficiency and Safety Study [NCT04469491]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-20Completed
Clinical Trial to Compare Topical Interferon Alfa 2b And Mitomycin C in Conjunctival-Corneal Intraepithelial Neoplasia [NCT02199327]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Phase III, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen of MK-5172/MK-8742 Versus Boceprevir/Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (PR) in Treatment-Naïve and PR Prior Treatment Failure Subjects With Chronic HCV GT1 Inf [NCT02204475]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Withdrawn
Observational Multicenter Study to Evaluate Influence of Insulin Resistance on the Safety and Efficacy (as Measured by Sustained Virological Response) of Treatment With Any Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin (Standard of Care) in Different Populations of [NCT00705224]250 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
A Phase 2A Study of BMS-791325 in Combination With Peg Interferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys) and Ribavirin (Copegus) in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection [NCT01193361]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Treatment of Chronic Delta Hepatitis With Lonafarnib, Ritonavir and Lambda Interferon [NCT03600714]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
To Study the Efficacy of 'Tenofovir Pulse and Peg Interferon Alpha 2b' Therapy in HBeAg-positive Patients With Normal ALT - A Randomized Control Trial [NCT02454764]0 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to lack of funds)
An Open-label Randomised Controlled Trial on Dual Therapy With Interferon Beta-1b and Clofazimine Combination, as Treatment for COVID-19 Infection [NCT04465695]Phase 281 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-14Recruiting
A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter Study, IBI310 in Combination With IBI308 and IBI308 Compared to High-Dose Interferon In Patients With Acral Melanoma That Has Been Removed by Surgery [NCT04277663]Phase 3136 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-17Terminated(stopped due to Due to the company's development strategy adjustment ,Innovent Bioligics decided not to continue the study after consultation with investigators)
Worldwide Trends on COVID-19 Research After the Declaration of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study [NCT04460547]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-07-25Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label, Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HQP1351 in CML CP Patients Who Are Resistant and/or Intolerant to First- and Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors [NCT04126681]Phase 2144 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-21Active, not recruiting
Peginterferon Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy for Hepatitis C Six Months After Onset of Acute Infection [NCT02377856]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Immune- and miRNA-response to Recombinant Interferon Beta in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT02364986]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
Open Controlled Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ingaron (Interferon-gamma) in the Treatment of Anogenital Warts (Phase III) [NCT05156541]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-18Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-centre Phase IIa Study in Asthma Patients Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Inhaled Interferon Beta-1a to Placebo, Administered for 14 Days After the Onset of Symptoms of [NCT02491684]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-21Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study, in COPD Patients With and Without a Confirmed Respiratory Virus Infection Assessing Anti-viral Biomarker Responses and Clinical Effects of Inhaled SNG001 Compared to Placebo [NCT03570359]Phase 2122 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-29Completed
Cross-sectional Retrospective Study of Therapeutic Compliance in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Interferon Beta-1b [NCT03408093]120 participants (Actual)Observational2009-02-03Completed
Neoadjuvant Combination Biotherapy With Pembrolizumab and High Dose IFN-alfa2b in Patients With Locally/Regionally Advanced/Recurrent Melanoma: Safety, Efficacy and Biomarker Study [NCT02339324]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-06Completed
AN OPEN LABEL, LONG-TERM EXTENSION STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY OF PF-06823859 ADMINISTERED TO ADULT PARTICIPANTS ≥18 AND ≤80 WITH ACTIVE DERMATOMYOSITIS. [NCT05192200]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-20Active, not recruiting
Long-Term Safety Extension Study of ACTIMMUNE® (Interferon γ-1b) in Children and Young Adults With Friedreich's Ataxia [NCT02797080]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-28Completed
Czech Pharmaco-epidemiological Real World Data Study Focused on Effectiveness of Different Disease Modifying Drugs [NCT05762003]17,478 participants (Actual)Observational2019-01-01Completed
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Albumin Interferon Alfa-2b in Combination With Ribavirin Compared With Peginterferon Alfa-2a in Combination With Ribavirin in Interferon Alfa Naive Subjects With CHC Genotype 1. ACHIEVE-1 [NCT00402428]Phase 31,331 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Vitamin D (Vit D), With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b (PEG-IFN)/Ribavirin (RBV) in Egyptian Patients With Untreated Chronic Hepatitis C: A Phase III Randomized Open-label Clinical Trial [NCT02099604]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study objectives were considered as obsolete regarding the new AAD arrival)
Prospective, Single-Center, Open Label, Pilot Study of Safety and Efficacy of Triple Anti-Viral Therapy With Pegylated Interferon, Ribavirin, and Boceprevir in Patients With Genotype 1 Chronic HCV With End Stage Renal Disease [NCT02112630]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
BETAEVAL - The New BETACONNECT® Auto-injector: Adherence and EVALuation of MS Patients Treated With Betaferon® [NCT02121444]151 participants (Actual)Observational2014-06-23Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Ranging, Parallel-Group Study of PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a (BIIB017) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02125578]Phase 169 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral BIIB061 as Add-On Therapy to Interferon-Beta 1 or Glatiramer Acetate Therapies in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT04079088]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Decision to discontinue BIIB061 program was based on lack of stronger preclinical effects of BIIB061 on remyelination relative to opicinumab, that showed limited clinical efficacy in phase 2 clinical studies. This was not related to safety concerns.)
Comparative Trial of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intramuscularly Injected CinnoVex® and Avonex® in Healthy Volunteers [NCT03614715]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-27Completed
Retrospective Data Collection on Betaferon Use in Children and Adolescents With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03577977]70 participants (Actual)Observational2008-06-01Completed
A Phase Ib Study of The Safety And Pharmacology of Atezolizumab (Anti-Pd-L1 Antibody) Administered With Ipilimumab, Interferon-Alpha, or Other Immune-Modulating Therapies in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT02174172]Phase 1158 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-18Completed
Open Label, Study to Determine the Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Steady State Tipranavir/Ritonavir (500/200 mg) and Steady State Ribavirin and Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2a in HIV Negative, HCV Infected Subjects With Mild Hepatic Impairment and the Pharm [NCT02259855]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Single Arm, Phase III Study to Assess the Self-administration of AOP2014 Using a Pre-filled Pen, Developed for the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera Patients [NCT02523638]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study, With an Open-Label Extension, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of E5501 in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Related Thrombocytopenia [NCT01355289]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase III Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of FP-1201-lyo (Recombinant Human IFN Beta-1a) and Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Moderate or Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [NCT02622724]Phase 3301 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-23Terminated(stopped due to Day 90 results indicate IMP did not reduce mortality or ventilator free days)
A Pilot Study of IFN-γ to Treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) That Has Relapsed After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04628338]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-08Completed
Multi-centre, Adaptive, Randomized Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Treatments of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Adults [NCT04315948]Phase 31,552 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-22Completed
Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Interferon-Alpha in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Failure on Interleukin-2 Based Regimens [NCT00591188]Phase 249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase 2B, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Lambda (BMS-914143) Administered With Ribavirin Plus a Single Direct Antiviral Agent (BMS-790052 or BMS-650032) Versus Pegasys Administered With Ribavirin (Part A) an [NCT01309932]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Better Identification of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Israeli Young Adults by Comparison Skin Tests and Interferon Gamma Releasing Assays (IGRA) [NCT02073669]115 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Neurocognitive Function in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Interferon Alpha-2b for High-Risk Melanoma [NCT02074605]36 participants (Actual)Observational2008-07-31Completed
Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Interferon-β-1a (IFNβ-1a) in COVID-19 Patients [NCT04449380]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-02Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
Pilot Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Therapy With Asunaprevir, Daclatasvir, Ribavirin and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in HCV Genotype 4-infected Patients Non-responders to Pegylated Interferon-Ribavirin Regimen [NCT02107365]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Multi Center, Phase IIIb Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Sequential Therapy of Peginterferon Alfa-2a(Pegasys(TM)) Following Entercavir Compared With Peginterferon Alfa-2a Monotherapy in Patient With HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepati [NCT01220596]Phase 3228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Recruiting
Prospective Multicenter, Non Interventional Study to Evaluate the Patient's Characteristics Associated With Adherence to Treatment Regimen by Betaferon in the BetaPlus Program [NCT01076595]73 participants (Actual)Observational2010-05-31Completed
A Prospective Analysis of MS Patients After Starting or Restarting Baseline Treatment With Interferon Beta 1a After the Use of Escalation Treatment [NCT01142518]86 participants (Actual)Observational2005-07-31Completed
An Open, Multi-center Clinical Study of Combination Therapy With Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Peginterferon Alpha 2a in Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs Experienced Patients With HBV Related Hepatic Fibrosis. [NCT03957629]186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-06Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Peg-Interferon Alpha-2B (Peg-Intron(TM)) and Thalidomide in Adults With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas [NCT00047879]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Multi-center, Two Part Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Double-blind, Placebo-controlled INX-08189 in Adjunctive Treatment With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Study Part A, and Open-label INX-08189 [NCT01425970]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Termination of study was due to safety reasons)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon Lambda-1a, With and Without Daclatasvir, Compared to Peginterferon Alfa-2a, Each in Combination With Ribavirin, in the Treatment of Naïve Genotype 2 [NCT01616524]Phase 3880 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Clinical Trial of the Efficacy, Dosing, Safety and Tolerability of Y- Shaped Pegylated Interferon (YPEG-IFNα-2a) Plus Ribavirin in Egyptian Patients With Untreated Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT01327729]Phase 2/Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
A Pilot Multi-Center, Open-Label, Assessor Blinded, Prospective Profiling Study in MS Subjects Treated With AVONEX®, MS Subjects Naïve to Treatment, and Healthy Control Subjects [NCT00913666]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locoregional Metastases in Malignant Melanoma (AJCC Stage IIIB/C) With Multiferon: a Phase IIa DeCOG Trial [NCT01341158]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase I/II, Multicenter, Randomized, Open,Active-Controlled, ClinicalTrial to Evaluate PK, PD, Safety and Tolerability Of Interferon Alfa 5, S.C. 3 Times Per Week, For 29 Days, To Treat-Experienced Pat. With Genotype-1 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT01121731]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Repeated Dose Intrapleural Adenoviral-Mediated Interferon-Alpha (SCH 721015, Ad.hIFN-a2b) Gene Transfer for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma [NCT01212367]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Differences in Evoked Intracellular Interferon Signaling Pathways Using Single Cell Phosphoprotein Profiling [NCT01217359]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis c Virus on Opioid Pharmacotherapy: Virological and Psychological Outcomes [NCT01120795]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled SNG001 to Placebo Administered to Asthmatic Subjects After the Onset of a Respiratory Viral Infection for the Prevention or Attenuation of Asthma S [NCT01126177]Phase 2300 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
National Multicenter, Controlled, Single-blind Study With Two Parallel Groups Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Treatment With Mitoxantrone and Interferon Beta-1a (REBIF 44mg 3 Times / Week) Versus Interferon Alone in Patients With Strong R [NCT02937285]Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-06Completed
Phase III Prospective Randomized Comparison of Depot Octreotide Plus Interferon Alpha Versus Depot Octreotide Plus Bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in Advanced, Poor Prognosis Carcinoid Patients [NCT00569127]Phase 3427 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-01Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-Label Immunogenicity and Safety Study of a Serum-Free Pre-Formulated Solution of AVONEX (Interferon Beta-1a) Administered Intramuscularly to Patients With Relapsing/Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00912860]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Portuguese BetaPlus Survey - Observational Study to Assess Drug Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS) After Conversion to Betaferon by Using Elements of the BetaPlus Program [NCT01235455]10 participants (Actual)Observational2007-08-31Completed
Therapy of the Chronic Multiple Sclerosis With Interferon-beta 1a (Rebif®) [NCT01142557]522 participants (Actual)Observational2004-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Interferon Alpha Lozenges Plus Oseltamivir in the Treatment of Influenza A Infection [NCT01146535]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Phase IIII Study of a Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate Containing Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Core Antigen (HBcAg) and HBV Surface Antigen (HBsAg) for Treatment of Patients With Chronic HBV Infection [NCT01374308]Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Premature Discontinuation of Injection Treatment With Betaferon in Patients With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01184833]852 participants (Actual)Observational2008-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b/2a, Open-label,Randomized, Safety, Tolerability, Dose Finding, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic, and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Subcutaneous Hanferon™ in Combination With Ribavirin in Treatment-naïve Subjects With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C [NCT01194037]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Interferon-gamma as Adjunctive Therapy in Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis: a Randomised Feasibility Study [NCT05653193]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Multicenter Study on Efficacy of New Therapeutic Schedules With Peg-Interferon alpha2b and Ribavirin in Patients With Genotype 3 Chronic HCV( Hepatitis C Virus) Infection [NCT01121705]Phase 3360 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Intravenous Interferon During the Anhepatic Phase of Liver Transplantation and Prevention of Recurrence of Hepatitis C Virus [NCT01192698]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
BetaPlus Survey - Observational Study to Assess Drug Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis After Conversion to Betaferon® by Using Elements of the BetaPlus Program [NCT01233245]1,077 participants (Actual)Observational2004-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Locally Manufactured Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis C Patients [NCT01137383]Phase 3108 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Therapy Optimisation Using High-frequency and High-dosage Administration of Interferon-beta (Rebif®) in MS Patients. Case Series for Adjustment of Treatment Strategy and Its Monitoring [NCT01142453]231 participants (Actual)Observational2005-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of Pegylated Interferon ALFA-2b in Children With Recurrent or Refractory and Radiographically or Clinically Progressive Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytomas and Optic Pathway Gliomas [NCT02343224]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim, Administered Once Weekly to Thrombocytopenic Hepatitis C (HCV) Infected Subjects Who Are Not Candidates for Antiviral Treatment With Pegylated Interferon a [NCT01153919]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Approval of several new agents for the treatment of HCV infection would mitigate the future need for interferon HCV treatment)
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Clevudine and Peg-interferon in Sequence Compared With Clevudine Alone in the Patients With HBeAg(+) Chronic Hepatitis B or Clevudine and Peg-interferon Sequential Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis [NCT01264367]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of IL-2/IFN-α Plus Bevacizumab Versus IL-2/IFN-α in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) - Danish Renal Cancer Group (DARENCA) Study-1 [NCT01274273]Phase 2118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Active, not recruiting
the Investigation Into Beneficial Effects of High-dose Interferon Beta 1-a, Compared to Low-dose Interferon Beta 1-a in Moderate to Severe Covid-19 [NCT04521400]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-20Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Study With Asunaprevir and Daclatasvir (DUAL) for Null or Partial Responders to Peginterferon Alfa and Ribavirin (P/R), Intolerant or Ineligible to P/R Subjects and Treatment-Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1b Infection [NCT01581203]Phase 3748 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Open-Label Extended Administration of SCH 54031 (PEG Interferon Alfa-2b/PEG Intron) in Subjects With Solid Tumors [NCT03554005]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-12-29Completed
Therapeutic Effect of Topical Estrogen and Human Interferon Alpha 2b Vaginal Effervescent Capsules in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With High-risk HPV Infection [NCT05863975]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study Of Interferon Alpha 2b Plus Ribavirin In The Treatment Of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT00275938]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants Interventional1998-10-31Completed
Phase II Trial Of Interferon-B In Patients With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma And Metastatic Ocular Melanoma [NCT00085306]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Observational Prospective Registry of the Efficacy, Safety, and Adherence to Therapy of Infergen® (Interferon Alfacon 1) in Patients Chronically Infected With Hepatitis C Virus [NCT00951223]0 participants (Actual)Observational2009-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of Enrollment)
A Phase 1 Double-Blind, Randomised, Two-Treatment Cross-over Study Comparing the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PF530 and Betaferon Administered by Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT02474134]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Phase I Biochemotherapy With Cisplatin, Temozolomide, With Increasing Doses of Abraxane, Combined With Interleukin-2 and Interferon in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00970996]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group, Monotherapy, Active-control Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) Versus Avonex® (Interferon β 1a) in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Scleros [NCT01064401]Phase 31,841 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Three Arm, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vigantol® Oil as Add on Therapy in Subjects With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Treatment With 44mg Tiw of Rebif® [NCT01285401]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Combination Immunotherapy With Interferon-gamma and Nivolumab for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1 Study [NCT02614456]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-11Completed
A Phase III Study With Long-Term Follow-Up of Zidovudine Versus Zidovudine and Alpha-Interferon Versus Alpha-Interferon in Patients With Early HIV Infection [NCT01125228]180 participants (Actual)Observational1988-10-19Active, not recruiting
Randomized Trial of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Versus Hydroxyurea Therapy in the Treatment of High Risk Polycythemia Vera (PV) and High Risk Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) [NCT01259856]Phase 3168 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase 2B Pilot Study of Short-Term Treatment of BMS-790052 in Combination With Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 2 or 3 Infection [NCT01257204]Phase 2196 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Phase IIa Randomized, Partially Blinded Trial of Telaprevir (VX-950) in Treatment-Naive Subjects With Chronic Genotype 4 Hepatitis C Infection [NCT00580801]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Antiviral Effect and Safety of Once Daily BI 201335 NA in Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infected Treatment-naive Patients for 12 or 24 Weeks as Combination Therapy With Pegylated Interferon-alpha 2a and Ribavirin (Randomised, Open Label, Phase II) [NCT00984620]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND) Plus Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (Rituximab) for Stage IV Indolent Lymphoma [NCT00577993]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-16Completed
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Support Biosimilar Development: Clinical Study 3 - Interferon Beta-1A and Peginterferon Beta-1A [NCT04183491]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-28Completed
Clinical and Virological Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Alpha in the Treatment of Rhinovirus Infection in Patients With Primary Hypogammaglobulinemia: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02661477]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Interferon α After Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for the Relapse Prevention After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02568241]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Recruiting
Therapeutic Safety and Efficacy of REP 2139 (REP 9AC') in HBV Infected Patients [NCT02646189]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending and Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Target Engagement of BMS-986184 in Healthy Subjects and to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, [NCT02864264]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-14Terminated(stopped due to Adverse change in the risk/benefit)
Phase I Trial of Systemic Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and Human Interferon, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Lymphomas, or Histiocytic/Dendritic Cell N [NCT03017820]Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-04Recruiting
A Clinical Study of SCH 54031 as Monotherapy in IFN-treated Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00686881]Phase 3261 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated due to low enrollment)
Efficacy of Switch or Sequential Combination Therapy of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Low HBsAg and HBeAg Titers After Long-term Entecavir Therapy: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study [NCT02589652]294 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study On The Effect Of Thalidomide Combined With Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (AD) And High Dose Melphalan In Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00028886]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-03-31Active, not recruiting
Phase 1/2A Study of Rintatolimod and IFN Alpha Regimen in Cancer Patients With COVID-19 [NCT04379518]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-17Suspended(stopped due to working on revision to protocol)
Betaferon Prospective Study on Adherence, Coping and Nursing Support [NCT00787657]1,723 participants (Actual)Observational2008-06-30Completed
Randomized, Open, Blank Control Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Interferon α1β in the Treatment of Patients With New Type of Coronavirus Infection in Wuhan [NCT04293887]Early Phase 1328 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-01Not yet recruiting
The Activity of Nitazoxanide in Addition to Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment-Naive Genotype 1 Subjects With HIV Coinfection [NCT00991289]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin Resistance in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Treated With Combination Therapy With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Taiwan [NCT00687999]400 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Chi3L1: A Marker of Efficacy of Platform Treatments in Relapsing-onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Prognostic Study on Existing Clinical Data and Biological Samples [NCT04289675]63 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2012-01-01Completed
A Phase 2b, Safety and Efficacy Study of Boceprevir in Patients Coinfected With HIV and Hepatitis C (Protocol No. P05411) [NCT00959699]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Phase 2B, Partially Blinded, Randomized Study in Treatment Naive HCV G1 to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Three Doses of Locteron Plus Ribavirin Given Bi-weekly in Comparison With PEG-Intron Plus Ribavirin Given Weekly [NCT00863239]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Long-term Extension of the Multinational, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Studies PDY6045 and PDY6046 to Document the Safety of Teriflunomide When Added to Treatment With Interferon-Beta or Glatiramer Acetate in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis With Rela [NCT00811395]Phase 2182 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Adoptive TIL Therapy With Low-dose IFN-alpha Plus Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Melanoma [NCT03638375]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind and Placebo Controlled Study of Once Daily BI 201335, 240 mg for 12 or 24 Weeks in Combination With Pegylated interferon-a (PegIFNa) and Ribavirin (RBV) in Patients With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Who Fa [NCT01358864]Phase 3678 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Open-label, Randomized, 2-arm, Active Comparator Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Transitioning From Standard-of-care Subcutaneous Interferon Therapy to Peginterferon Beta-1a (BIIB017) [NCT02234869]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to a change in Biogen Idec's medical research plans.)
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Combination Treatment With REP 2139-Ca and Pegasys™ in Patients With Hepatitis B / Hepatitis D Co-infection [NCT02233075]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Phase 3, Open-Label Study With Asunaprevir and Daclatasvir Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys) and Ribavirin (Copegus) (P/R) (QUAD) for Subjects Who Are Null or Partial Responders to Peginterferon Alfa 2a or 2b Plus Ribavirin With Chronic Hepatitis C G [NCT01573351]Phase 3398 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicentre, Open, Randomised, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Combination Therapy Containing Dacarbazine (DTIC) Plus Low Dose Interferon Alpha (aIFN) Plus Thymosin a1 Versus Both DTIC Plus Thymosin a1 and DTIC Plus aIFN in P [NCT00911443]Phase 2488 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of EC17 (Folate-hapten Conjugate) in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00485563]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Changes in treatment paradigm resulted in a lower than expected rate of accrual.)
A Phase I Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Dose-Escalation Study of rSIFN-co in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors and With an Expansion Cohort at Recommended Dose (RD) in Subjects With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Melanoma, Hepatocellula [NCT02387307]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AlbuminInterferon in Combination With Ribavirin Compared With Peginterferon in Combination With Ribavirin in Interferon Alfa Naive Subjects With CHC Genotype 2/3. [NCT00411385]Phase 3933 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
PFL-Alpha Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery or FHX for Early Stage Esophageal Cancer - A Pilot Project [NCT00004897]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Institutional Review Board requested termination - all patients deceased and no new accrual.)
Phase II Study of Multimodality Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00004231]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Phase 1b, Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label Study of a Conditionally Replicative Adenovirus (DNX-2401) and Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) for Recurrent Glioblastoma or Gliosarcoma (TARGET-I) [NCT02197169]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-11Completed
Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Interferon Beta-1a (Bioferon®) Administered i.v. and s.c. as Single Doses to Healthy Subjects [NCT02515695]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Active-Control (Rater Blinded) Study, to Evaluate The Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of 2 Doses Of Oral Administration Of Laquinimod (0.6 mg/Day Or 1.2 mg/Day) Compared to Interfer [NCT01975298]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Business Decision)
An Open-label Randomised Controlled Trial on IFN Beta-1b and Ribavirin Combination, as Treatment for Covid-19 Infection [NCT04494399]Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-29Recruiting
Extension Protocol for Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Carcinoma That Have Responded to Treatment With Pegylated-Interferon α-2a or Roferon-A® in Prior Clinical Studies [NCT02829775]Phase 2/Phase 39 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon α-2b in Combination With Ruxolitinib vs. Pegylated Interferon α-2b Monotherapy for Treating Hydroxyurea-resistant/Intolerant Polycythemia Vera [NCT05870475]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-30Recruiting
A 18-month, Open-label, Rater-blinded, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Pilot Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod in Comparison to Interferon Beta 1b in Treating the Cognitive Symptoms Associated to Relapsing-remit [NCT01333501]Phase 4151 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Tolerability and Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Switched to Intramuscular Interferon Beta 1a Autoinjector (Avonex® PenTM) [NCT02076841]40 participants (Actual)Observational2013-07-31Completed
Randomized, Multicentric, Partially Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study for Examining the Influence of Ribavirin on the Initial Virological Response With Treatment of Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD) and Ribavirin With a Six Week Pretreatment-Pha [NCT02716779]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Prospective Randomized Open-label Comparative Study of the Use of Intranasal Form of Interferon Gamma Human Recombinant in Patients for the Prevention of Acute Respiratory Viral Infections, Including COVID-19 [NCT05054114]630 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-21Completed
Effect and Safety of Recombinant Human Interferon α-2b Spray on Herpangina in Pediatric Patients [NCT03266601]Phase 4668 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Completed
Tolerance-Induction With Dendritic Cells Treated With Vitamin-D3 and Loaded With Myelin Peptides, in Multiple Sclerosis Patients (TOLERVIT-MS) [NCT02903537]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-06Recruiting
Interferon Alpha (NSC# 377523) Plus 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid Modulation Of BCL-2 Plus Paclitaxel For Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00062010]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-26Completed
Treatment of Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma With High Dose Therapy and Stem Cell Support Followed by Consolidative Immunotherapy With Rituximab and Alpha Interferon [NCT03069248]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-01Completed
Evaluation of a CD4/CD8+ Interferon Gamma Release Assay for Monitoring Anti-Tuberculosis Treatment [NCT05724212]220 participants (Actual)Observational2017-01-27Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Estimation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Different Regimens of MK-5172 When Administered Concomitantly With Peginterferon Alfa-2b and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Ch [NCT01353911]Phase 2368 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-27Completed
AVASTIN® First Line in Metastatic Renal Cancer [NCT02627144]365 participants (Actual)Observational2008-01-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) and Interferon Gamma 1-b Combination Immunotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome (Treatment Group 1) and in Patients With Advanced Synovial Sarcoma (Treatment Group 2) [NCT03063632]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-14Completed
Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Boceprevir vs Telaprevir and Re-assessment of Treatment Duration in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT02113631]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety, Toxicity, and Potential Mechanisms of Interferon Gamma-primed Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) for Moderate-to-severe Persistent Asthma [NCT05035862]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-16Recruiting
Assessment of the Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Sarcoidosis [NCT05089565]101 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-12-01Completed
Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Bria-IMT Regimen and Check Point Inhibitor vs Physicians' Choice in Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer. [NCT06072612]Phase 3404 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-20Recruiting
Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Rintatolimod Combined With IFNα2b (Bioferon®) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT05756166]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
Interferon-α1b (IFN-α1b) Combined With Toripalimab and Anlotinib Hydrochloride in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma [NCT05539118]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Not yet recruiting
COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment in Cancer; a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial; C-SMART Study. [NCT04534725]Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-17Completed
Interferon α for the Therapy of Minimal Residual Disease Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02185261]81 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01412333]Phase 3835 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-20Completed
Observational Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes After Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients [NCT04071353]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-08-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine) With Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00561912]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual.)
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b Plus Ribavirin Combination Treatment for Older Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00956982]1,251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-12-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Randomized, Open Label, Multi-center, Therapeutic Trial of the Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of GI-5005; an Inactivated Recombinant Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Expressing a Hepatitis C Virus NS3-Core Fusion Protein, Combined With Pegylated I [NCT00606086]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Interferon Alpha Therapy for Cervical CIN I and HPV Infection [NCT06137950]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-07Recruiting
PEG-Interferon a-2b + Ribavirin for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in HIV-Infected Persons Not Previously Treated With Interferon [NCT00215891]Phase 3300 participants InterventionalCompleted
An Open-label, Randomized, Active Controlled, Parallel Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of REP 2139-Mg in Combination With Pegasys® and Viread® and REP 2165-Mg in Combination With Pegasys® and Viread® in Patients With HBeAg Negative Chronic Hep [NCT02565719]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
The Treatment of Uveitic Cystoid Macular Edema With Topical Interferon Gamma [NCT00943982]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-17Completed
A Randomised, Open-label, Multi-centre Phase II Study of BAY43-9006 (Sorafenib) Versus Standard Treatment With Interferon Alpha-2a in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. [NCT00117637]Phase 2189 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Prospective Anti-HCV Trial of Peg-Interferon and Ribavirin in Subjects of First Nations, Metis and Caucasian Ethnicity: PRAIRIE Study [NCT00957866]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Low Dose Treatment of Ribavirin in Combination With PEG-IFN Alfa-2b in CHC Patients With genotype1 High Viral Load and Low Body Weight [NCT00686777]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Neurobehavioral Deficits in HIV/HCV Infection Pre/Post Anti-HCV Therapy [NCT00747539]330 participants (Actual)Observational2008-07-31Completed
Protocol Title: A Phase II Open-labeled Study to Determine the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Interferon-gamma 1b (IFN-γ 1b) in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are HBV DNA Positive [NCT00753467]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Multinational, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Design Pilot Study to Estimate the Tolerability, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Teriflunomide for 24 Weeks When Added to Treatment With Interferon-beta [NCT00489489]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Anti-Ganglioside GD3 Mouse/Human Chimeric Antibody KW2871 Combined With High Dose Interferon-α2b in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00679289]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-28Completed
The Effects of Interferon-gamma on Sepsis-induced Immunoparalysis, a Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Pilot (Phase IIIb) Study [NCT01649921]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Glivec® in Combination With Vincristine and Dexamethasone in Patients With Lymphoid Blast Crisis CML or Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Relapse or Refractory [NCT00763763]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Optimization of Treatment for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infected With HCV-genotype 2 or 3: 12 vs. 24 Weeks of Treatment Extension for Patients Without Rapid Virological Response [NCT00803309]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to At the end of the planned recruitment period the expected number of subjects could not be included in the trial.)
The Observational Cohort Study on Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Antiviral Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B and Cirrhosis [NCT04301908]10,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-04-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia [NCT02735707]Phase 310,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-11Recruiting
An Observational 20-year, Cross-sectional, Long-term Follow up of the Patient Cohort Enrolled in the Pivotal Study of Betaseron® (Interferon Beta-1b) in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01031459]176 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
An International, Multi Centre, Prospective, Observational Study of Safety, Tolerability and Adherence of Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif® New Formulation) in Real Life Settings [NCT01080027]254 participants (Actual)Observational2008-10-31Completed
Thalidomide-Dexamethasone vs Alpha-Interferon-Dexamethasone as Maintenance Therapy After Thalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Combination for [NCT00633542]Phase 3103 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Palliative Radiofrequency Ablation in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Small Primary Tumor [NCT00891475]Phase 1/Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Antiviral Activity of Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A in Chronic HIV-1 Infection [NCT00594880]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Performed in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Laquinimod Over Placebo in a Double-blind Design and of a Reference [NCT00605215]Phase 31,331 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-24Completed
Combination of Continuous Low Doses of Vinorelbine, Cyclophosphamide and Interferon Alpha 2b for Antiangiogenic/Antivascular Effect in Adult Advanced Neoplasm [NCT00908869]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
HBsAg Loss Adding Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a in HBeAg-negative Patients Treated With Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues. [NCT02743182]119 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Biologic Therapy in Patients With Stages III/IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT00054561]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-11-26Completed
An International Multicenter Double-blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BCD-054 (JSC BIOCAD, Russia), 180 μg and 240 μg, Versus Avonex® (Biogen Idec Ltd., UK) in Patients With Relapsing-remitting M [NCT02744222]Phase 2/Phase 3399 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-10Completed
Interleukin 12-Primed Activated T Cells For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Or Colorectal Carcinoma (Phase I) [NCT00016042]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-01-31Active, not recruiting
An International Randomized Trial of Additional Treatments for COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients Who Are All Receiving the Local Standard of Care Philippines [NCT05024006]1,314 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-23Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon Beta-1a (CinnaGen) Versus CinnoVex® (CinnaGen) in Reducing the Annualized Relapse Rate in Participants With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Phase III, Randomized, Parallel, Noninferiority Study [NCT05242133]Phase 3168 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-20Completed
Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Study of a Combination of Torisel® (Temsirolimus) and Avastin® (Bevacizumab) Versus Sutent® (Sunitinib) and Versus a Combination of Avastin® (Bevacizumab) and Roféron® (Interferon Alpha-2a) in First-line Treatm [NCT00619268]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Thalidomide for Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer With Optional Interferon Alpha-2a Upon Disease Progression [NCT00006006]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study Assessing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of AOP2014 and Standard First Line Treatment (BAT) in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Who Previously Participated in the PROUD-PV Study [NCT02218047]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Single-center, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy [NCT06091735]444 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Autologous CD8+ and CD4+ Transgenic T Cells Expressing High Affinity MCPyV-Specific TCRs Combined With Avelumab and Class I MHC-Upregulation in Patients With Metastatic MCC Refractory to PD-1 Axis Blockade [NCT03747484]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-03Recruiting
An Open-label Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 24 or 48 Weeks Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a 40 kD (PEGASYS) Combination Therapy With Ribavirin (Copegus) in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 2 or 3 Infection Who Previously Ha [NCT00641654]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment problems in Denmark and Norway)
Evaluation of Natural Human Interferon Alpha Lozenges in the Treatment of Chronic Cough in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) [NCT00690885]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient patient accrual)
A Phase II Trial Of Adjuvant Chemoradiation Following Pancreatic Resection For Adenocarcinomas Of The Pancreas Using 3-D Conformal Radiation With Cisplatin, 5FU, And Alpha-Interferon As Radiosensitizing Agents Followed By Gemcitabine [NCT00660270]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Randomized Prospective Open-label Trial for Comparing Combination Therapy Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a/Adefovir Dipivoxil and Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus no Treatment in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Low Vira [NCT00973219]151 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
An Open Clinical Trial to Evaluate Ganovo(Danoprevir ) Combined With Ritonavir in the Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection [NCT04291729]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-17Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Rater-Blinded Study Comparing Two Annual Cycles of Intravenous Alemtuzumab to Three-Times Weekly Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00530348]Phase 3581 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Inhibition of DNA Methylation by 1-hr Infusion of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) x 10 Days (M-F) With Escalating Doses of Sub-Q Pegylated (PEG) Interferon-alfa 2B (PEG-Intron): A Phase I Study With Molecular Correlates [NCT00886457]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Autologous Marrow Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Using Stem Cells Obtained After In Vivo Cyclophosphamide/G-CSF Priming [NCT00005984]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated as principal investigator [PI] left the university.)
A Non-interventional Study Evaluating Injectable Treatments (Ofatumumab, Glatiramer Acetate and Interferon β1) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [AIOLOS] [NCT05344469]800 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-05-10Recruiting
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Recombinant Interferon-Alpha in the Treatment of Recurrent Unresectable Meningiomas and Malignant Meningiomas [NCT00002965]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-01-31Completed
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Profile of Understudied Drugs [NCT04278404]5,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-03-05Recruiting
Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Exposed to Diroximel Fumarate [NCT05688436]1,178 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-09-24Recruiting
Betaferon® Injection Management: Non-interventional Study on Personal Digital Assistant (PDA)Supported Effects on Adherence to a Long-term Injection Therapy (BETAPATH) [NCT00902135]702 participants (Actual)Observational2009-05-31Completed
A 12-month Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Fingolimod (FTY720) Administered Orally Once Daily Versus Interferon ß-1a (Avonex) Administered im Once Weekl [NCT00340834]Phase 31,292 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Prospective Multicenter, Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Impact of the Introduction of Interferon Beta-1 b Treatment on Daily Life Activities in Patients at High Risk of Developing Multiple Sclerosis After a First Clinical Demyelinating Event or [NCT00928967]67 participants (Actual)Observational2007-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Chemoimmunotherapy for Patients With Potentially Platinum Sensitive Müllerian (Epithelial Ovarian, Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube) Carcinomas [NCT00501644]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Rater- and Dose-Blinded Study Comparing Two Annual Cycles of Intravenous Low- and High-Dose Alemtuzumab to Three-Times Weekly Subcutaneous Interferon Beta 1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Who Have [NCT00548405]Phase 3840 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Study Evaluating Betaferons® Safety and Tolerability In Pediatric Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00963833]68 participants (Actual)Observational2009-12-17Completed
The Individualized Management With Pegasys and Ribavirin Offering Viral Eradication (IMPROVE) Trial [NCT00483938]Phase 3236 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effect, Safety and Tolerability of 250µg (8 MIU) Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day (for 24 Weeks) in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00370071]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase 2 Rollover Protocol of Telaprevir (VX-950) in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects Enrolled in the Control Group (Group A) of Study VX06-950-106, VX05-950-104 and VX05-950-104EU Who Did Not Achieve [NCT00535847]Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of SCH 54031 PEG12000 Interferon Alfa-2b (PEG Intron) vs. INTRON®A as Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma [NCT03552549]Phase 2/Phase 3126 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-05Terminated(stopped due to This study was closed to enrollment prematurely due to sub-optimal accrual.)
Combination Therapy Using Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept) and Human Interferon beta1a (Rebif) in Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00618527]Early Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Inhibition of DNA Methylation by 1-Hr Infusion of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycitidine (Decitabine) x 10 Days (M-F) With Escalating Doses of Sub-Q Pegylated (PEG) Interferon-alpha 2B (PEG-Intron): A Phase I Study With Molecular Correlates [NCT00701298]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Immunogenicity and Safety Study of Avonex® (Interferon Beta-1a) 30 mcg Administered Subcutaneously to Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00784836]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated early by Sponsor for business reasons unrelated to safety.)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Rater-blinded Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Teriflunomide and Interferon Beta-1a in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Plus a Long Term Extension Period [NCT00883337]Phase 3324 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Treatment of Acute Hepatitis C Virus in HIV Co-Infection [NCT00845676]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
An Evaluation of Two Dose Routes of HDV-Interferon Administered With Ribavarin in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Nonresponders and Naive Hepatitis C Patients [NCT00703872]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-7009 Administered Concomitantly With Pegylated-Interferon and Ribavirin for 28 Days in Japanese Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection [NCT00880763]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-20Completed
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for Dialysis Patients With Acute Hepatitis C [NCT00917358]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of PEG-Intron in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia [NCT00588146]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Schering-Plough discontinued supplying study drug.)
Pegetron® Redipen™ Prospective Optimal Weight-based Dosing Response Program [NCT00724893]2,430 participants (Actual)Observational2005-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Recombinant Interferon Alpha and Etoposide in Patients With Relapsed Osteosarcoma [NCT00504140]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-11-30Completed
)A Study to Evaluate the Erythropoietic Response in HCV/HIV Co-Infected Patients Receiving Combination Ribavirin/Interferon Therapy [NCT00315432]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter Protocol Providing Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a (PEGASYS®) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Ribavirin (COPEGUS®) for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Who Have Participated in Previous Roche or Roche Partner Protocols [NCT00800735]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
a Multi-sites, Randomized, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Clinical, Pilot Study to Evaluated the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha-2b Gel (Yallaferon®) in HPV Infection [NCT02593968]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
International, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study of Subcutaneous Every-other-day Treatment of Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis With (Phase A): Double-blind Betaseron/Betaferon 250µg or 500µg or Open-label Betaseron/Betaferon 250µg and (Phase B): Ope [NCT00459667]Phase 31,420 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safe and Effective Use of the Single-Use Autoinjector With an Avonex® Prefilled Syringe in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects [NCT00828204]Phase 395 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Study of Adjuvant Cytokine Therapy in Pulmonary Mycobacterium Avium Complex and Other Pulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections [NCT00111397]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-13Completed
Cost-effectiveness of Quantiferon Gold in VITRO Test of T-lymphocytic Response for Detection of Latent Tuberculosis in At-risk Healthcare Workers [NCT00797836]Phase 41,024 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
An Open Label Study of the Effect of First Line Treatment With Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Low-dose Interferon on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. [NCT00796757]Phase 2146 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Adoptive T Cell Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT04072263]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-01Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Treatment With the Immunomodulator Interferon-α-2b (Intron A®) for the Adjuvant Treatment of Malignant Melanoma. [NCT00749684]138 participants (Actual)Observational1996-12-31Completed
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Children With Intron Vial or Pen and Rebetol According to German Law (§ 67 Abs 6 AMG) [NCT00727077]3 participants (Actual)Observational2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study halted due to low recruitment. The 3 participants at time of termination transferred into study P04538 (NCT00727077). See NCT00727077 for details/results.)
Brimonidine Tartrate for the Treatment of Injection Related Erythema Associated With Sub-cutaneous Administration of Peginterferon Beta-1a (BRITE) [NCT02568111]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Withdrawn
A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Avastin Plus Roferon Compared With Placebo Plus Roferon on Overall Survival and Tumor Assessment in Nephrectomised Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00738530]Phase 3649 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Human Interferon-alpha by the Oral Mucosal Route During the 6-Month Follow-up Period of Standard Combination Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection [NCT00695019]Phase 2169 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Guidelines to the Intron A® Health Management Program II: A Nursing Support Program for Patients With High-Risk Melanoma Receiving High Dose Intron A Therapy [NCT00723710]299 participants (Actual)Observational2006-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase II Study to Compare Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney [NCT00719264]Phase 2365 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-12Completed
An Open, Randomized, Multicentre Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a 24-week Course of PEG-Interferon Alpha-2b Versus a 12-week Course of PEG-Interferon Alpha-2b Alone or Plus Ribavirin in Patients With Acute Hepatitis C [NCT00686517]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Modulation of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Function in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00468182]24 participants (Actual)Observational2007-04-30Completed
A Phase II Protocol in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Using Gemcitabine/Docetaxel Chemotherapy and An Oxaliplatin-Based Chemoradiation. [NCT00761241]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Emotional Disorders During Treatment by Interferon Beta in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients [NCT01201343]Phase 479 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Celecoxib Plus Interferon Alpha in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With 3+ COX-2 Tumor Immunostaining [NCT01158534]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Low-Dose Interferon Alfa 2B (Schering Plough) Plus Thalidomide (Celgene) for Patients With Resected High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00026416]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-10-31Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Dose-ranging, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lonafarnib With Ritonavir-Boosting +/- Peginterferon Alfa-2a in Patients Chronically Infected With Delta Hepatitis (HDV) (LOWR-2) [NCT02430194]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Parallel Phase I/II Study of Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine) With Peginterferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma [NCT00791271]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-02Terminated
Open-Label, Single Arm Evaluation of BMS-790052 (Daclatasvir) in Combination With Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Black-African Americans, Latinos and White-Caucasians With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection [NCT01389323]Phase 3448 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
An Open, Prospective/Retrospective, Randomized Controlled Cohort Study to Compare the Efficacy of Two Therapeutic Schemes(Abidol Hydrochloride,Abidol Hydrochloride Combined With Interferon Atomization)in the Treatment of 2019-nCoV Pneumonia. [NCT04254874]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01247324]Phase 3821 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Phase IV, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Study of Rebif® 44mcg Administered Three Times Per Week by Subcutaneous Injection Compared With no Treatment in the Therapy of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis After Mitoxantrone [NCT01142466]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Open Label Study of Safety and Efficacy With BMS-790052 Plus Peg-Interferon Alfa 2a and Ribavirin in Previously Untreated HCV Patients Coinfected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) [NCT01471574]Phase 3549 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Labeled, Active-Controlled Trial of 24-Week Versus 48-Week Courses of Peg-Interferon Alpha Plus Ribavirin for Genotype-1 Infected Chronic Hepatitis C Patients [NCT00629967]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Tailored Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotype 1 [NCT00910975]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Early Response to Interferon Combined Short-Term Nucleoside Analogue Therapy in HBeAg(+) Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT00860626]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Recruiting
An Exploratory Study of Adjuvant Therapy of Pegylated Interferon-Alfa 2b Plus Melanoma Peptide Vaccine in Patients With Resected Stage II and III (N1a, N2a) Melanoma [NCT00861406]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-10Completed
Targeted Oncolytic Virotherapy and Natural History Study of KSHV-Associated Multicentric Castleman's Disease With Laboratory and Clinical Correlates of Disease Activity [NCT00092222]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-28Active, not recruiting
Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antiviral Effect of BI 201335 NA in HCV-1 Infected Patients Treated for 28 Days for Treatment naïve and Experienced Patients Treated in Combination With Peg Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin [NCT00947349]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Characteristic Study on Chinese Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00818103]600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK7009 Administered Concomitantly With Pegylated-Interferon and Ribavirin for 28 Days in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection [NCT00704184]Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-25Completed
Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Bevacizumab + Temsirolimus Vs. Bevacizumab + Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00631371]Phase 3791 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
PILOT-high Throughput-protein Profiling Analysis of Sera Collected From E1694 Patients Undergoing HDI (Arm B) [NCT00897520]40 participants (Actual)Observational2008-01-14Completed
Analysis of Gene Expression of PBMC in the Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b-infected Patients During Peg-interferon-α Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy [NCT00680173]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Pregnancy Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis Populations Exposed and Unexposed to Interferon β - a Register-based Study in the Nordic Countries [NCT02749396]2,089 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-02Completed
A Phase I Study of 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) With Interferon α2b in Metastatic Melanoma Patients [NCT00398450]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Role of Heme Oxygenase in the Pathogenesis od Hepatocellular Injury in Chronic HCV Infection [NCT00842205]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of VX-950 in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®), With and Without Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects With Hepatitis C [NCT00372385]Phase 2334 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cell-Based Idiotype Vaccination With Adjuvant Cytokines for Plateau Phase and Post-Transplant Multiple Myeloma [NCT00616720]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Interferon + GM-CSF Versus K562/GM-CSF Vaccination in CML Patients Achieving a Complete Cytogenetic Response to Frontline Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy [NCT00363649]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study With PegIntron vs. Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) e Antigen Positive Patients in Taiwan [NCT00371761]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Viral Oncoprotein Targeted Autologous T Cell Therapy for Merkel Cell Carcinoma [NCT01758458]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Terminated(stopped due to A Phase I/II study (NCT01758458) is now recruiting)
Phase II/III Study of Recombinant Anti-tumor and Anti-Virus Protein for Injection Compared With Placebo in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of Second-Line and More Than Second-line Treatment [NCT01386242]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Sorafenib Alone and Sorafenib in Combination With Low Dose Interferon Alpha-2a as Second-line Treatment of Sunitinib Failure in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00678288]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated
Phase II Study of a Multi-Antigen Therapeutic Vaccine in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00613509]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to No safety concerns, the study was terminated due to slow enrollment. All enrolled patients were followed per protocol.)
Betaferon Treatment and Exercise Data Gathering IN Early MS [NCT00882453]1,739 participants (Actual)Observational2006-08-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Interferon Alfa-2b and Lovastatin Combination Therapy for Patients With High-risk Resected or Unresectable Malignant Melanoma [NCT00963664]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Modifications will be necessary before full IRB approval will be secured.)
Randomized Phase 1/2 Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Administration of a Chemokine-Modulatory Regimen in Patients With Recurrent Resectable Colorectal Cancer [NCT01545141]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Terminated
Phase I/II Prospective, Open Label and Multicentric Clinical Trial to Determine the Recommended Dose (Phase I) and Efficacy of Pazopanib in Combination With Interferon Alfa 2-A (Phase II), in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT01513187]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-11Completed
[NCT01404117]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study is being redesigned)
IPI-Biotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated With Cytotoxic Drugs [NCT01409187]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Withdrawn
Prospective Open Controlled Non-interventional Study of the Use of the Drug Ingaron (Interferon Gamma Human Recombinant, NPP Farmaklon LLC, Russia) in Volunteers for the Prevention of Coronavirus Infection COVID-19 [NCT05386446]100 participants (Actual)Observational2020-04-23Completed
Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Betaseron 500 Mcg Subcutaneously Every Other Day and Betaseron 250 Mcg Subcutaneously Every Other Day for at Least 12 Weeks in Patients With RRMS [NCT00893217]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Augmenting Response to Entecavir Using a Temporary Peginterferon Alpha-2a add-on Strategy for the Treatment of HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT00877760]Phase 4184 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Assessment of the Vascular Changes Induced With Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Interferon-α in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00873236]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Study of TG4040 (MVA-HCV) in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin Versus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-naïve Patients With Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C. [NCT01055821]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin Combination Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis C Post-Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00881582]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Phase 3 Study of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Advanced Resectable Rectal Cancer Comparing Modulation of 5-FU With Folinic Acid or With Interferon-alpha [NCT01060501]Phase 3796 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-07-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Chemosensitization With Paclitaxel, 13-cis Retinoic Acid and Interferon Alpha-2b in Advanced Uterine Cervical Carcinoma [NCT00138151]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual and lack of study drug)
Hepatitis C Virus Dynamic and Immune Activation in HIV-1 Coinfected Patients Treated With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin [NCT00909129]25 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
A Multicenter Study of the Safety and Anti-Fibrotic Efficacy of Interferon-Gamma 1b (Actimmune) in Patients With Severe Lever Fibrosis or Compensated Cirrhosis Due to Hepatitis C. [NCT00043303]Phase 2502 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
An Open Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ingaron (Interferon-gamma Human Recombinant) in the Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis [NCT05378646]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-29Completed
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Primary Uveal Melanoma With Genetic Imbalance [NCT01100528]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-11Completed
Evaluation of Natural Human Interferon Alpha Lozenges in the Prevention of Winter Colds and Flu in Perth, Western Australia [NCT00895947]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of Multiple Doses of ABT-333 Alone and in Combination With Pegylated Interferon (pegIFN) and Ribavirin (RBV) in Subjects With Ge [NCT00851890]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
An Investigation Into Beneficial Effects of Interferon Beta 1a, Compared to The Base Therapeutic Regiment in Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial [NCT04350671]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-15Enrolling by invitation
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of Escalating Single Dose Recombinant Human Serum Albumin/Interferon alpha2b Fusion Protein in Healthy Chinese Volunteers [NCT02781753]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-07Completed
Human Recombinant Interferon Gamma-1b for the Prevention of Hospital-acquired Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: a Double-blind, International, Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial - the PREV-HAP Study [NCT04793568]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-29Active, not recruiting
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BMS-986202 in Healthy Subjects and to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic [NCT02763969]Phase 1357 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Albinterferon Alfa 2b Administered Every 4 Weeks Plus Ribavirin in Interferon Alfa-naïve Patients With Genotype 2/3 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00759200]Phase 2525 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Atorvastatin 40 mg in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Interferon-beta-1b.SWiss Atorvastatin and Interferon-Beta 1b Trial In Multiple Sclerosis. [NCT00942591]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Effect of Interferon-gamma 1-b on Innate Immune Cells [NCT02609932]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
US PROmyBETAapp2.0: Ascertaining Medication Usage and Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) Via the myBETAapp™ in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With BETASERON® Using BETACONNECT™ Autoinjector [NCT04356339]100 participants (Actual)Observational2020-11-24Completed
An Open-Label Safety Extension Study of AVONEX® (Interferon Beta-1a) Treatment in Subjects Who Completed Biogen Studies C95-812, C96-823, or C97-830 [NCT00915460]Phase 4408 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of IDX719 in Combinations With Simeprevir and/or TMC647055/Ritonavir With or Without Ribavirin for 12 Weeks in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection [NCT01852604]Phase 2143 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Carcinoid Tumors After Failure of Somatostatin Analogs: a Randomized Phase III of Octreotide Lutate Peptid Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) Versus Interferon α-2b [NCT01860742]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Withdrawn
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of Escalating Single Dose Recombinant Human Serum Albumin/Interferon alpha2a Fusion Protein in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01901198]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Profile of Mother-caregivers of Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01921374]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
The Efficiency of Postoperative Interferon-alpha(IFNa) Treatment in p48 Positive Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00838968]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to we have found another marker (microRNA26) which is more sensitive to evaluate the effect of postoperative IFNa treatment in patients with HCC)
A Randomized Phase 2a, Multicenter, Open-label Study Evaluating ABI-H0731-Containing Regimens in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT04781647]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-18Terminated(stopped due to Study ABI-H0731-203 was terminated early by the study Sponsor for strategic reasons to prioritize research and development efforts on finite and curative HBV therapies.)
A Pilot Phase II Study of Immunotherapy for the Treatment of AML, ALL, BP CML, and MDS Relapsed After Allogeneic Transplantation [NCT00548847]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Partially Blinded, Placebo and Avonex Controlled Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy As Measured by Brain MRI Lesions, and Safety of 2 Dose Regimens of Ocrelizumab in Patients With RRMS [NCT00676715]Phase 2220 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-17Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tailored Regimens With Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin According Viral Kinetics for Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Patients [NCT01937728]Phase 4542 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase I/II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Licensed Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Administered With Recombinant Interferon Alpha Among Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00962715]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn
Phase II Study of Weekly Administered High-Dose Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2B (PEGIntron) in Advanced Stage Low Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00006039]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-12-31Completed
PEG-Intron Observation After Regional Lymph Node Dissection in AJCC Stage III (TxN1-2MO) Melanoma Patients: a Randomized Phase III Trial [NCT00006249]Phase 31,258 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Active, not recruiting
Autologous Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Using Retrovirally Marked Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells Obtained After In Vivo Cyclophosphamide/G-CSF Priming [NCT00005986]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Principal investigator left the university.)
Phase II Trial of SU5416 and Interferon Alfa 2B in Unresectable or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00006384]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-a (IFN-a) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00006343]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Phase II Evaluation of Immunization With an HLA-A2 Multi-Epitope Peptide Vaccine Containing MART-1 (NSC #672643), gp100 (NSC #683472), and Tyrosinase (NSC #699048) Peptides Alone or in Combination With GM-CSF, IFN Alpha-2b, or GM-CSF + IFN Alpha-2b in Pat [NCT00006385]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Phase 2 Study Of High Dose Chemotherapy Followed By Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Support In Patients With Multiple Myeloma And Primary Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT00007995]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-07-31Completed
High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed By Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Support And One Of Two Regimens Aimed At Modifying Immune Reconstitution In Women With High Risk Stage 2 And Stage 3 Breast Cancer [NCT00008203]Phase 30 participants Interventional1996-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Doses of Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN Alfa-2a) in Combination With Zidovudine (AZT) and Dideoxycytidine (ddC) Versus AZT and ddC Only in Patients With HIV Infection and Less Than 400 CD4 Cells/mm3 [NCT00000754]Phase 260 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Phase II Trial to Determine the Safety, Tolerance, and Efficacy of Two Doses of Interferon Alfa-2b Combined With Didanosine in Patients With Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00001114]Phase 290 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II Pilot Study of Multi-Agent Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT00262951]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed at a planned interim analysis by meeting a predefined toxicity endpoint)
Use of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIg) to Restore Immune Control in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT03575208]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-13Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow/Insufficient accrual)
A Phase I/II Open Label Study To Evaluate the Antiviral Potential of Combination Low-Dose Therapy With Zidovudine and Interferon-Alpha 2A in Patients With Symptomatic HIV Disease [NCT00000696]Phase 148 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase I Study of AZT and Human Interferon Alpha (Recombinant Alpha-2A and Lymphoblastoid) in the Treatment of AIDS-Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00001113]Phase 148 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Pilot Study of High Dose Busulfan Combined With IL2/GM-CSF Activated Autologous/Syngeneic PBSC, Sequential IL2/GM-CSF Therapy and Alpha Interferon Maintenance Therapy as Treatment of CML [NCT00005948]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of Interferon-Alfa2b Alone Versus Interferon-Alfa2b Plus Thalidomide in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic or Unresectable Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00005966]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma With Chemobiotherapy With Temozolomide, GM-CSF, IL2, and Interferon Alfa-2b Phase II Trial [NCT00014092]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-12-31Completed
Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Research Study of Multiple Myeloma Using Chemotherapy Plus Growth Factor Primed Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Followed by Autologous Transplantation and Post-Transplant Immunotherapy [NCT00005987]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Withdrawn because treatment guidelines changed)
Study of Cerebral Function in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Before and After Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin Therapy [NCT00788918]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Quality Assurance of HCV-therapy With PegIntron® Plus Rebetol® in Drug-substituted Patients - SUPPORT Project Post-Marketing Surveillance Study [NCT00726557]246 participants (Actual)Observational2005-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study in Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Interferon Alfa-2a in Treating Patients With End Stage Renal Disease and Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00172809]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Avonex Pregnancy Exposure Registry [NCT00168714]329 participants (Actual)Observational2004-02-29Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Avonex® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis [NCT00616434]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Improving Hepatitis C Treatment in Injection Drug Users [NCT00148031]Phase 4111 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Pilot Study of Pegylated Interferon-Alfa 2b in Combination With PUVA Therapy in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00724061]7 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Closed early due to poor accrual.)
ANRS HC20 Pilot Study, Multicenter, Assessing the Effectiveness of an Optimized Anti HCV (360μg/Week Induction of PegIFN-alpha2a + 18mg/kg/j of RBV for 6 Months and Then Depending on the Virological Response to S12, Elongation up S72 to the Dual Anti HCV, [NCT00901524]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Phase 3 Study of 2 Dose Regimens of Telaprevir in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Treatment-Naive Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00627926]Phase 31,095 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFNα-2a) Alone in Egyptian Patients With Acute Hepatitis C [NCT00158522]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Early Prediction of Successful Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Taiwan [NCT00543244]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2006-01-31Recruiting
Efficacy of High Doses of Both Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin for Retreatment of HIV-coinfected Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Due to HCV Genotype 1 or 4 Nonresponders to Previous Standard Therapy. [NCT01006031]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Study of Add-on Cladribine Tablet Therapy With Interferon-beta (IFN-β) Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects With Active Disease [NCT00436826]Phase 2172 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
QOLBET Quality Of Life in Patients With Early Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated With BETaferon® in Korea [NCT01071694]0 participants (Actual)Observational2011-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study Manager could not embark on it during the timeline.)
Hepatitis C in a Cohort of Patients With Maintenance Therapy for Opiate Dependence - Prevalence, Severity and Outcome of Antiviral Therapy [NCT01045278]Phase 4277 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of 24 vs 48 Weeks of Pegetron® (Peginterferon Alfa-2b + Ribavirin) Therapy (1.5 mcg/kg/Week + 800-1200 mg/Day) in Naïve Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Patients With High Baseline Viral Load Who Are HCV-RNA Negative at Week 4 and Week 12 [NCT00423800]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated due to difficulty in recruiting participants.)
A Prospective, Multi-center, Observational Study to Assess the Tolerability of Interferon-beta 1-A (Rebif®) Therapy for Korean Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01074346]60 participants (Actual)Observational2008-08-31Completed
A Study to Assess Treatment With PEG-Intron® and Rebetol® in Naïve Patients With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C and Slow Virological Response [NCT00265395]Phase 31,428 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
An Open-label Extension Study of the Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Phase 2 Study 307000A to Further Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Betaseron® 500 mcg Subcutaneously Every Other Day and Betaseron® 250 mcg Subcutaneously Eve [NCT00235989]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Multicentre, Single Arm, Open, Phase IV Study To Evaluate Immunogenicity And Safety Of Subcutaneous r-hIFN Beta-1a (Rebif®) Using Clone 484-39 In The Treatment Of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00367484]Phase 4460 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
An Open-label Study to Assess the Effect of First-line Treatment With Avastin in Combination With Standard Therapy on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. [NCT00520403]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Extension of the Double-blind, Placebo-controlled BENEFIT Study (no. 92012/304747) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data of Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Patients With a First Demyelinating E [NCT00185211]Phase 3468 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial of the Effects of Interferon Alfa-2b on the Immunogenicity of a Polyvalent Melanoma Antigen Vaccine in Patients With Stage III Malignant Melanoma [NCT00004104]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BMS-986165 in Healthy Subjects and to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic [NCT02534636]Phase 1140 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-α (IFN-α) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00333840]Phase 31,106 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Evaluation of Natural Human Interferon Alpha Administered Oromucosally in the Treatment of Oral Warts in HIV-seropositive Subjects Receiving Combination Anti-retroviral Therapy: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial [NCT00454181]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing the Rate of Molecular Response 4.5 at 12 Months in Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Positive Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients Receiving Either Frontline Nilotinib 600 mg Daily or Nilotinib 60 [NCT02201459]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
Medical Ozone Versus Conventional Interferon-α Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B -A Control Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Ozone-therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT01887275]Phase 4439 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Treatment of Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Injection Drug Users With Pegylated Interferon for 24 Weeks [NCT00194480]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Efficacy of the Addition of P1101 (PEG-Proline-Interferon Alpha-2b) to Imatinib Treatment in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Not Achieving a Complete Molecular Response (MR 4.5 or BCR-ABL [NCT01933906]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-30Completed
Does Induction PEG-Intron in Combination With Rebetol Enhance the Sustained Response Rates in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00207363]Phase 4610 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Pilot Trial of Combination Therapy With Interferon Alfacon1, Ribavirin, & Rosiglitazone in a Group of Insulin Resistant, Chronic Hepatitis C, GT 1 Patients Who Are Previous Relapsers or Nonresponders to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin [NCT00207402]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of the SV-BR-1-GM Regimen in Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer Patients in Combination With Retifanlimab [NCT03328026]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-16Enrolling by invitation
Effectiveness of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin in the Treatment of Active and Past Intravenous Drug Users Infected With Hepatitis C [NCT00203606]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Viramidine to Ribavirin in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00230958]Phase 3900 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Dose-seeking and Efficacy Study of the Combination of the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib and High-dose Interferon Alfa-2b for Therapy of Advanced Melanoma [NCT01943422]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A PHASE II STUDY OF MITOXANTRONE AND HIGH-DOSE ARA-C FOLLOWED BY INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND ETOPOSIDE FOR MYELOID BLAST CRISIS OF CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA (CML) [NCT00002598]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-06-30Completed
New Immunomodulatory Therapy Strategies in Chronic Reactive Arthritis: Immunostimulation Plus Antibiotic Versus Immunosuppression Plus Antibiotic Versus Conventional Standardtherapy [NCT00244179]Phase 240 participants Interventional2003-01-31Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Sequential Vaccinations With Fowlpox-CEA(6D)-Tricom (B7.1/ICAM/LFA3) and Vaccinia-CEA (6D)-Tricom, in Combination With GM-CSF and Interferon-Alfa-2B in Patients With CEA-Expressing Carcinomas [NCT00217373]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study Of BAY 43-9006 In Combination With Interferon Alfa-2b In Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer [NCT00098618]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Terminated
A Pilot Study of Aerosol Interferon-gamma for Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT00563212]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Multicentre, Open Label, Non-Comparative Trial Investigating the Recovering of INF-Beta Efficacy in Breakthrough Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Neutralizing Interferon-Beta Antibodies [NCT00492466]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Effect of Long-term Vitamin D Therapy on IL-6, Visfatin and Hyaluronic Acid in Hepatitis C Virus Patients' Assessment [NCT01997203]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to complete patients samples required)
Phase Ib Study of Recombinant Human Serum Albumin/Interferon alpha2a Fusion Protein in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [NCT01997944]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of Nilotinib Plus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b as First-line Therapy in Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia Aiming to Maximize Complete Molecular Response and Major Molecular Response. [NCT02001818]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
Pegasys and Copegus for Asian Patients With Treatment-naive Hepatitis C Genotypes 6, 7, 8, 9: a Phase IV, Randomized, Open-labeled, Multicenter Trial Comparing 24-week vs. 48-week Therapy [NCT00575224]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Role of A. Lumbricoides in the Development of Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients [NCT05783544]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Open-label Trial in Japan to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of TMC435 as Part of a Treatment Regimen Including Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Genotype 1, Hepatitis C-infected Subjects Who Relapsed After Previous IFN-based Therapy [NCT01290731]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Telaprevir Administered Twice Daily or Every 8 Hours in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection [NCT01241760]Phase 3744 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
[NCT02027064]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Hansenula-Derived Pegylated-Interferon Alpha-2a and Ribavirin Customized Combination Therapy in Egyptian Children With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection [NCT02027493]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase IIa Clinical Trial to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Gamma Treatment in Elevating Frataxin Levels in Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) Patients [NCT02035020]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Pilot Study of Bioimmunotherapy With IRESSA (Gefitinib) and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a for Patients With Unresectable/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin [NCT00423397]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Phase II/III, Open-Label, Controlled, Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Interferon-alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin Versus PEG-interferon-alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infe [NCT00008463]Phase 2132 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
PHASE I/II STUDY OF IMMUNIZATION WITH MHC CLASS I MATCHED ALLOGENEIC HUMAN PROSTATIC CARCINOMA CELLS ENGINEERED TO SECRETE INTERLEUKIN-2 AND INTERFERON-GAMMA [NCT00002637]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-01-31Completed
Phase II Study of Zidovudine and Recombinant Alpha-2A Interferon in the Treatment of Patients With AIDS-Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00000687]Phase 260 participants InterventionalCompleted
Inhaled Interferon α2b Treatment in Mild-to-moderate COVID-19 Infected Children [NCT05381363]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Terminated(stopped due to The study was concluded as planned upon reaching its predetermined endpoint, which included the completion of data collection and achievement of the necessary sample size for statistical significance.)
A Phase II Study of an Anti-Tumor Immunotherapy Regimen Comprised of Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2b (PEG-Intron)and HyperAcute Melanoma Vaccine for Subjects With Advanced Melanoma [NCT00746746]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Study to Examine the Difference in Tolerability Associated With Titration Of Dose on Initiation of Avonex therapY (TODAY) [NCT00574041]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to poor recruitment)
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With Persistently Normal Alanine Aminotransferase Levels With Peginterferon α-2a (40 kDa) Plus Ribavirin [NCT00575627]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-09-30Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Differentiation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Using Interleukin-6 and Interferon-a [NCT00470093]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Transcatheter Arterial Pegylated Interferon Embolization (TAIE) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00563095]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Capecitabine or 5-FU With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b in Unresectable/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT02218164]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-12Completed
Randomized Controlled Open Label Trial of Peg Alpha 2a Interferon and Adjusted-dose of Ribavirin vs. Standard Therapy in the Treatment of Naive Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Infected With Genotype 4 [NCT01686789]Phase 4181 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy of Supplementary Treatment With Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) in Patients With Relapsing- Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Treated With Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a 44 µg 3 Times [NCT01198132]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Multi-center, Open-label, Single-arm, Before and After Switch Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Alemtuzumab in Paediatric Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) With Disease Activity on Prior Disease Modifyi [NCT03368664]Phase 316 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-24Active, not recruiting
BETAPREDICT - MS Patients Treated With BETAferon®: PREDICTors of Treatment Adherence [NCT02486640]162 participants (Actual)Observational2015-09-08Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial Assessing the Combination of Chemokine Modulation With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT04081389]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-06Completed
Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intratumoral and Intravenous Injection of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Expressing Human Interferon Beta and Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1) in Patients With Metastatic Ocular Melanoma and Pr [NCT03865212]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-12Active, not recruiting
Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma With Multidrug Regimen Including Interferon, Interleukin-2 and BRAF Inhibitor [NCT01603212]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-18Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial of PEG-IFN-SA in HCV Disease: Evidence for Drug Safety, Tolerance, and Antiviral Activity [NCT01605513]Phase 1/Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
An Open-Label, 3-Panel, Dose-Escalation Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Viral Kinetics of Two Doses of LocteronTM (Poly ActiveTM - Interferon Alpha 2b) Given Every 2 Weeks for 4-12 Weeks in Comparison With PEG-Intron Giv [NCT00593151]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective and Retrospective, Long-Term Observational Study of AVONEX® and Rebif® to Determine the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) [NCT00599274]136 participants (Actual)Observational2002-08-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of 40kD Branched Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a (PEG-IFN, RO 25-8310) Versus 96 Weeks of PEG-IFN, Alone or in Combination With 100 mg Lamivudine for 48 Weeks in Patien [NCT01095835]Phase 3131 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of ABT-267 in Combination With Peginterferon Alpha-2a and Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Genotype 1 Chr [NCT01314261]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Combined Treatment of Sorafenib and Pegylated Interferon α2b in Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma: a Prospective Non-randomized, Multicenter Phase II Study [NCT00623402]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Physical Disability Observational Study in Patients Treated With Betaferon in Daily Practice [NCT00873340]83 participants (Actual)Observational2007-10-31Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Different Regimens of MK7009 When Administered Concomitantly With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Genotype 1 [NCT00895882]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Withdrawn
Title: Evaluation of Systemic IDO Levels After Various Immunotherapeutics [NCT00897312]7 participants (Actual)Observational2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
Association of Rituximab to Immunochemotherapy With CVP + Interferon in Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma Patients With Intermediate-high FLIPI Score. Phase II Study. [NCT00842114]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
An Open-label, Randomized Study of PegIntron in the Treatment of HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [NCT00536263]Phase 3671 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial Using Subcutaneous Injections of Intron A for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scar [NCT00686478]Phase 30 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to The trial is not being done at this time)
Study of Systematic Tuberculosis Testing for Active, Sub-clinical and Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a United Kingdom Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infected Cohort [NCT02712671]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2013-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell (αDC1) Vaccine in Combination With Tumor-Selective Chemokine Modulation (Interferon-α2b, Rintatolimod, and Celecoxib) in Subjects With Chemo-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02615574]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to inadequate supply of drug)
Open, Randomized and Multicenter Phase IV Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Treatments Duration 24 Versus 48 Weeks in Chronic Hepatitis C Genotypes 2 and/or 3 co-Infected HIV-HCV Patients. [NCT00611819]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Active, not recruiting
Australian Trial in Acute Hepatitis C [NCT00192569]Phase 4167 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Temozolomide Alone or With Pegylated Interferon-alpha 2b in Patients With Resectable American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IIIB/IIIC or Stage IV (M1a) Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00525031]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Oral High-Dose Atorvastatin Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00616187]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
International, Multicenter, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Drugs BCD-033 and Rebif for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT02727907]Phase 2/Phase 3163 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-12Completed
Retreatment of Dialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Who Fail Interferon Alfa or Pegylated Interferon Alfa Monotherapy - a Pilot Study [NCT00491179]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase II of Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study of Hepalatide for Injection Combined With Pegylated Interferon and TAF as Finite Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [NCT05244057]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-23Recruiting
A Multi-center Double-blind Parallel-group Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Treated With Interferon-beta [NCT01252355]Phase 3534 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision to prematurely stop the study, not linked to any safety concern.)
A Phase I Study Of Peginterferon Alfa-2b (PEG-INTRON) With Sorafenib (Nexavar) In Patients With Unresectable Or Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma (RCC). [NCT00589550]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Stibogluconate in Combination With Interferon Alpha-2b for Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00629200]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-13Completed
An Open-label, Dose-ranging, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lonafarnib With and Without Ritonavir Boosting in Patients Chronically Infected With Delta Hepatitis (HDV) (LOWR-1) [NCT02430181]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Intratumoral Dendritic Cell Vaccination Combined With Local Radiotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Lymphoma. [NCT00637117]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The study never opened and not sure if it ever will.)
Impact of the BETACONNECT Auto-injector on BETASERON Therapy Adherence and Patient Satisfaction [NCT02652091]146 participants (Actual)Observational2016-02-05Completed
A Phase II Open Label Study of MK-7009 Administered Concomitantly With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin to Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection After Participation in Other MK-7009 Clinical Trials [NCT00943761]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-23Completed
Prospective Study of the Molecular Characteristics of Sensitive and Resistant Disease in Patients With HTLV-I Associated Adult T Cell Leukemia Treated With Zidovudine (AZT) Plus Interferon Alpha-2b [NCT00854581]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Investigator Decision)
The Safety and Cost-effectiveness of Discontinuing Disease-modifying Therapies in Stable Relapsing - Onset Multiple Sclerosis (DOT-MS): a Randomized Rater-blinded Multicenter Trial. [NCT04260711]130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-label, Multicenter International Trial Comparing Ruxolitinib With Either HydRoxycarbamIDe or Interferon Alpha as First Line ThErapy for High Risk Polycythemia Vera [NCT04116502]Phase 3586 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-25Recruiting
Pilot Trial of Interferon Beta-1a in Alzheimer's Disease [NCT01075763]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Prospective Study of Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin: Outcomes Assessment in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients [NCT02850289]385 participants (Actual)Observational2006-04-30Completed
De-escalation After Natalizumab Treatment With Interferon-beta-1b in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01144052]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
The Response and Outcomes of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Concomitant With Malignancy Other Than Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00630084]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
MERS-CoV Infection tReated With A Combination of Lopinavir /Ritonavir and Interferon Beta-1b: a Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Randomized Trial [NCT02845843]Phase 2/Phase 395 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes in Chronic HBV Infection Patients With Low HBsAg Loads Under Unplanned Intervention [NCT04030039]420 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-05-01Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00629824]Phase 4250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a (BIIB017) in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00906399]Phase 31,516 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Vitamin C Combined With Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) [NCT04664010]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-06Completed
Interferon-gamma With Interferon Alpha and Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Patients Who Are Non-responders to Interferon Alpha Plus Ribavirin [NCT00538811]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluated the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha-2b Gel (Yallaferon®) in HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Infection [NCT02801383]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis With Sofosbuvir in Combination With Ribavirin With or Without Pegylated Interferon: North India Gastroenterology Consortium [NCT02799355]1,203 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-31Completed
"WHO Public Health Emergency Solidarity Clinical Trial for COVID-19 Treatments" [NCT04647669]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Not yet recruiting
Extension Study of the BENEFIT (304747) and BENEFIT Follow-up (305207) Studies to Further Evaluate the Progress of Patients With First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00544037]283 participants (Actual)Observational2007-09-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Assess the Safety and Antiviral Activity of PEG-rIL-29 Administered as a Single Agent and in Combination With Ribavirin in Treatment-Relapsed and Treatment-Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection [NCT00565539]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
IPI-Biochemotherapy for Chemonaive Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01409174]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual, closed in Phase I.)
Betaferon® Regulatory Post-Marketing Surveillance [NCT01414816]355 participants (Actual)Observational2008-04-30Completed
A Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Double-blinded Trial of BCG and Interferon Alpha in High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer [NCT00330707]Phase 2/Phase 3140 participants Interventional1995-10-31Completed
A Multiple-Dose, Open-Label, Phase 1, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Study of Avonex® in Chinese Healthy Volunteer Subjects [NCT01416207]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of 4 and 8 Million Units Betaferon®/Betaseron® (Interferon Beta-1b) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Chronic [NCT00185250]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of SCH 54031 in Surgically Resectable Squamous Cell Tumors of the Head and Neck [NCT00276523]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Fotemustine and Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine +/- Alpha Interferon in Advanced Malignant Melanoma: Phase III Study [NCT01359956]Phase 3269 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Optimum Dose of Pegylated-Interferon (PEG INTRON) in Patients With Platinum Resistant Ovarian, Peritoneal or Fallopian Tube Cancer [NCT00085384]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow accrual.)
A Phase II Trial of a MART-1/gp100/Tyrosinase Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cell Vaccine Treated With CD40 Ligand/Gamma Interferon With Subcutaneous IL-2 for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00006113]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
A Phase 2b Study of Merimepodib in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Non-Responsive to Prior Therapy With Pegylated Interferon Alfa and Ribavirin [NCT00088504]Phase 2315 participants Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation Approaches for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03535298]Phase 4800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-03Recruiting
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Cisplatin + Gemcitabine HCl (GEM) + Low-Dose Metronomic Interferon-a (IFN-a) Combined With Fever-Range Whole-Body Thermal Therapy (FR-WB-TT) in Patients With Metastatic/or Locally Advanced Malignancies (Small-Cell Lung Cancer, [NCT00178698]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-07-31Recruiting
Multicentric Trial Comparing Three Therapeutical Strategies in Patients With Acute Primary HIV Infection.ANRS 112 INTERPRIM [NCT00196638]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants Interventional2002-05-31Terminated
Efficacy of Low Dose Pegylated Interferon-α 2a Plus Ribavirin for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotypes 2 or 3, in HIV-coinfected Patients. [NCT00553930]Phase 471 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Interferon Gamma-1b by Inhalation for the Treatment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis [NCT00043316]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase 2 Study of Omega Interferon Alone or in Combination With Ribavirin in Subjects With Hepatitis C [NCT00097045]Phase 290 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Recombinant Human Interferon Beta-1a in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Dose Escalation and Safety Study [NCT00097318]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-11-17Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Determine Subject Satisfaction in Using the Single-Use Autoinjector With a Pre-Filled Liquid AVONEX® Syringe in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects [NCT00915577]Phase 374 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
An Observational Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes After Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients [NCT04301882]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-09-01Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Interferon Based Therapy and Interferon-free Direct-acting Antivirals in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatitis C. Impact of Antiviral Therapy on Gastroesophageal Varices. [NCT02758509]237 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-01Completed
Randomized Treatment Interruption of Natalizumab [NCT01071083]Phase 2175 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Combined With Interferon in the Treatment of Recurrence of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myeloid Tumors of the Blood System [NCT04078399]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-28Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Trial of Cisplatin + Gemcitabine in Combination With Mild, Fever-Range Whole-Body Hyperthermia to Treat Patients With Advanced, Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00178763]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-09-30Recruiting
Intron-A/Aldara Combination Therapy for BCC Excluding the Face and Scalp [NCT00581425]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the RAF-Kinase Inhibitor BAY 43-9006 (NSC-724772, IND-69,896) in Combination With Interferon-Alpha 2B in Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer [NCT00101114]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Oxaliplatin/Adriamycin/5 Fluorouracil in Continuous Infusion / Interferon α-2b (OXAFI) Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Unresectable Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00471484]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Recruiting
Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of the Combination of Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFNα-2a) Plus Ribavirin in Egyptian Patients With Untreated Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00158496]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of 5-azacitidine in Combination With Interferon-Alfa 2B in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00217542]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Factors Associated to Success of Hepatitis C Therapy [NCT00514111]100 participants (Actual)Observational2007-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-simulated, Placebo Parallel-controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study on Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Interferon ω Spray in Treatment of Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection in Children [NCT05859984]Phase 2345 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-31Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Interferon-Gamma 1b (rIFN-Gamma 1b) Given With Standard Therapy in Patients With Candidemia [NCT04979052]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-31Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomised, Open Label, Active-controlled Study of an Interferon-free Regimen of BI 207127 in Combination With Faldaprevir and Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir in Combination With Pegylated interferon-a and Ribavirin in Treatment-naive Patien [NCT01858961]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Withdrawn
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Versus Emtricitabine / Tenofovir +/- Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for the Treatment of Chronic HBe-Ag Positive Hepatitis B Infection in HIV-Coinfected Patients - the PEGPLUS Trial [NCT00221286]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
A Single-centre Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a New Inhaled Formulation of AVONEX® (Interferon Beta-1a) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01863069]Phase 177 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
A Phase II, Single Arm, Multicenter Study of Nilotinib in Combination With Pegylated Interferon-α2b in Patients With Suboptimal Molecular Response or Stable Detectable Molecular Residual Disease After at Least Two Years of Imatinib Treatment (NordDutchCML [NCT01866553]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
A Phase II Study of Interferon-Based Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT00059826]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Single Center, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Silibinin (Legalon® SIL) in Combination With Ribavirin or With Peginterferon and Ribavirin, Versus Peginterferon and Ribavirin Based Standard of Care (SoC) in Treatment [NCT01871662]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn
[NCT01872442]Phase 20 participants Interventional2013-10-15Completed
Interferon γ-Primed Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Prophylaxis for Acute Graft v Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Myelodysplasia [NCT04328714]Phase 145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-02Suspended(stopped due to Study is suspended pending renovation and reopening of the facility manufacturing the study product.)
An Clinic Trial of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha Nasal Drops to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Medical Staff in Epidemic Area [NCT04320238]Phase 32,944 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-21Recruiting
A Pragmatic Trial to Evaluate the Intermediate-term Effects of Early, Aggressive Versus Escalation Therapy in People With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03500328]900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-02Recruiting
A Phase II Study Of Autologous Tumor/DC Vaccine (DC Vaccine) Combined With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) And Interferon-α-2a (IFNα-2a) In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) [NCT00085436]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of Peg-Intron, GM-CSF And Thalidomide In Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00090870]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Pharmaceutical collaborator pulled funding.)
A RANDOMISED STUDY OF OBSERVATION VERSUS ADJUVANT LOW DOSE EXTENDED DURATION INTERFERON ALPHA-2A IN COMPLETELY RESECTED HIGH RISK MALIGNANT MELANOMA [NCT00002892]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-10-31Completed
Cytokine-Based Immunotherapy Following High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00003408]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
HBsAg Loss/Seroconversion in Inactive Chronic Hepatitis B Carriers Treated With Peginterferon Alpha-2a [NCT01471535]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Randomized, Comparative Phase II/III Study Between Treatment With CSF470 Vaccine (Allogeneic, Irradiated) Plus BCG and MOLGRAMOSTIN (rhGM-CSF) as Adjuvants and Interferon-alfa 2b (IFN-ALPHA), in Stages IIB, IIC and III Post Surgery Cutaneous Melanoma Pati [NCT01729663]Phase 2/Phase 3108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Recruiting
Study Assessing Cognitive Performance Plus Physical Activity in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting MS Under Treatment With Betaferon® [NCT01491100]1,085 participants (Actual)Observational2012-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of Interferon Beta-1a Manufactured by Two Different Processes [NCT01500408]Phase 1110 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Interferon Gamma Administration in Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency Type I [NCT00001905]Phase 25 participants Interventional1999-04-30Completed
A Randomized Discontinuation Trial to Determine the Clinical Benefit of Continuation of Sorafenib Following Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00352859]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated
International, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Comparing Over a Treatment Period of at Least 104 Weeks: 1. Double-Blinded Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Betaseron/ Betaferon 250 µg ( [NCT00099502]Phase 32,244 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Prospective Two-week Open-label Application Experimental Randomized Single-center Non-interventional Study of the Drug Ingaron in Patients With a New Coronavirus Infection COVID-19 [NCT05386459]36 participants (Actual)Observational2020-04-21Completed
Open-Label, Multicenter, Observational, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Adherence to Treatment With 250mcg (8MIU) IFNB-1b (Betaseron®) Given Subcutaneous Every Other Day Over a Period of up to 12 Months in Patients With a First Clinical Demyelinating Event [NCT00461396]104 participants (Actual)Observational2007-05-31Completed
A Multi-centre, Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Investigating Simvastatin as an Add-on Treatment IM Administered Interferon-beta-1a for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00492765]Phase 4380 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Multi-Centre, Open Label Study to Investigate the Recovery of IFN-beta Efficacy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Neutralising IFN-beta Antibodies and Reduced Bioavailability [NCT00493116]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Optimizing IFN Beta - 1B Dose [NCT00473213]Phase 3217 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Multicentric, Controlled and Randomised Open Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Dose Adaptation of Ribavirin Using Pharmacologic Measures of Ribavirin Exposition During Combination Peginterferon Alfa-2 and Ribavirin Treatment in Naive [NCT00485342]Phase 3236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Recruiting
A Randomized Trial Comparing a Short Course Versus Standard Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection [NCT00502970]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Adjuvant Low-dose Interleukin-2 (IL2) Plus Interferone-alpha (IFN) in Operable Renal Cell Cancer (RCC). Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). [NCT00502034]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-07-31Completed
A Study of Pegylated Alfa Interferon, Sunitinib and Tarceva in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00522249]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI decision)
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Comparison of Imatinib at a Dose of 400mg in Combination With Peg-Interferon-alpha2a (Peg-IFNa2a) or Cytarabine (Ara-C)Versus Imatinib at a Dose of 600mg Versus Imatinib a Dose of 400mg for Previously Untreated Chronic M [NCT00219739]Phase 3789 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Birdshot RETINE CHOROIDOPATHY Treatment by Either Steroid or Interferon alpha2a [NCT00508040]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Effectiveness and Side Effects of Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a (Pegaferon®) Plus Ribavirin in the Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00527540]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Interferon (Pegylated or Not) in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in Brazil (DECISION) [NCT01280656]660 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
Evaluation of the Correlation Between the MS Functional Composite Index and Two Quality of Life Scales (MS54 and AMS Quality of Life) in Relapsing MS Patients Treated With Interferon Beta-1a (AVONEX®) [NCT00534261]Phase 4284 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Completed
A Phase I Trial of Monoclonal Antibody HGS-ETR2 (Lexatumumab) With or Without Interferon Gamma in Patients With Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors [NCT00428272]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-04Terminated
[NCT00466219]Phase 325 participants Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A 2 Year, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled Core Phase to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Daily Fingolimod vs Weekly Interferon β-1a im in Pediatric Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and 5 Year Fingolimod Extension Phase [NCT01892722]Phase 3220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-26Recruiting
Four Arms, Multicenter, Open Label Study of Tailored Regimens With Peginterferon Plus Ribavirin for Genotype 2 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00540345]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial on Interferon β-1b and Remdesivir Combination Versus Remdesivir as Treatment for COVID-19 Infection [NCT04647695]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-20Recruiting
A Multicentre, Randomized Controlled Trial in HBsAg Seroclearance After Receiving Combined Therapy of Peginterferon and Tenofovir in Nucleos(t)Ide Analogue-treated Patients With HBV Related Liver Fibrosis. [NCT04640129]Phase 4272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-30Not yet recruiting
Effect and Safety of Adding Metformin to the Standard Treatment of Hepatitis C on Sustained Viral Response [NCT00560690]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Phase II Trial to Assess the Activity of TroVax® Alone vs. TroVax® Plus Interferon Alfa (IFN-α) on Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer [NCT00445523]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Study of Four Weeks High Dose IFN-2b in StageT3-T4 or N1 (Microscopic) Melanoma [NCT00447356]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to There were no patient enrolled in this study at this site)
Subcutaneous Continuous Infusion of Interferon Alfa-2b and Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Nonresponders [NCT00624325]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
An Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Monotherapy Alone With Tenofovir Monotherapy Followed by Concurrent Combination of Pegylated Interferon-Alpha-2b and Tenofovir or Tenofovir Monotherapy Follow [NCT01727271]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn
International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Phase III Study of Narlaprevir/Ritonavir and Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin in 2 Patient Populations - naïve and Treatment Failure Patients With Genotype 1 Chronic Hep [NCT03833362]Phase 3420 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-07Completed
The SIM-SOF Trial: A Randomized Trial Comparing Simeprevir-Sofosbuvir Versus Peginterferon/Ribavirin/Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype-1a-infected Patients With Cirrhosis [NCT02168361]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Hyperthermic Isolated Limb Perfusion With Melphalan, Tumor Necrosis Factor, and Interferon-Gamma in Patients With Locally Advanced Extremity Melanoma [NCT00001296]Phase 3122 participants Interventional1992-02-29Completed
Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Betaseron in AIDS and Advanced ARC Patients Receiving a Reduced-Dose AZT Regimen [NCT00002238]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
The Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Utilizing VBMCP Chemotherapy Alternating With High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Alpha2b-Interferon Versus VBMCP: A Phase III Study for Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00002556]Phase 3312 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-07-31Completed
PHASE II STUDY OF SIMULTANEOUS HOMOHARRINGTONINE (NSC 141633) AND ALPHA INTERFERON (IFN-A) THERAPY IN CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA (CML) [NCT00002574]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-09-30Completed
Phase I-II Study of Fluorouracil in Combination With Phenylbutyrate, Indomethacin and Recombinant Human Interferon-Gamma in Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00002796]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
Randomized Trial of Autologous GVHD for Refractory Lymphoma [NCT00003414]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
A European Randomized Multicenter Study of Interferon Alfa-2b Versus No Treatment After Intensive Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsing Lymphoma Patients (Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas and Hodgkin's Disease) [NCT00003924]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-10-31Active, not recruiting
Intraperitoneal (IP) Autologous Therapeutic Tumor Vaccine AUT-OV-ALVAC-h.B7.1 Plus IP rIFN-gamma for Patients With Ovarian Cancer. A Pilot Study [NCT00004032]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
A National Phase II Trial of Intron (Interferon-alfa 2b) Plus BCG for Treatment of Superficial Bladder Cancer [NCT00004122]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-07-31Completed
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Hepatitis C Treatment in HIV Co-infected Patients in Routine Care Services in Asia: A Pilot Model of Care Project [NCT01838772]Phase 4188 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Open-label Early Phase 2 Study With a Single Arm of Interferon Gamma-1b Treatment of Osteopetrosis [NCT02666768]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-22Completed
Phase 1/2 Study of Human Menstrual Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation for the Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis [NCT01483248]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Infliximab in Hepatitis-C Genotype 1 Naïve Patients With High TNF-alpha on the Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b/Ribavirin Therapy [NCT00237484]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-18Completed
An Open-Label Study of the Safety of Subcutaneous Recombinant Interferon Gamma-1b in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT00076635]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Terminated(stopped due to program discontinued based on GIPF-007 results)
Phase IV Study of Treatment of Acute Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon [NCT00241618]Phase 4180 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AVONEX When Used in Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) [NCT00099489]Phase 267 participants Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase I Trial of Peginterferon Alfa-2b (PEG-Intron) for Plexiform Neurofibromas [NCT00253474]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized Study to Determine the Impact of Antiretroviral Treatment in HCV/HIV-Coinfected Subjects With High CD4+ Cell Count on the Efficacy of Hepatitis C Treatment With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2A and Ribavirin [NCT00100581]2 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II/III Study of Immunomodulation After High Dose Myeloablative Therapy With Autologous Stem Cell Rescue for Refractory/Relapsed Hodgkin Disease [NCT00070187]Phase 2/Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Adjuvant α-Interferon Treatment After Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV-Related Cirrhosis: a Randomized Trial on Prevention of Cancer Recurrence [NCT00273247]Phase 3150 participants Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Randomized, Controlled Study of Buprenorphine and Methadone in Hepatitis C Patients in Need of Treatment [NCT00279565]Phase 4128 participants Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to The trial was terminated because of deviations from the protocol.)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Gamma-1b in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (The INSPIRE Trial) [NCT00075998]Phase 3826 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to test drug showed lack of benefit at interim analysis)
A Multi-Center Phase II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI and Fludarabine for HLA-Matched Related Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic and Accelerated Phase [NCT00110058]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Combination Therapy for HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B: Comparing Thymosin Alpha 1 and Pegylated Interferon-alpha2a With Pegylated Interferon-alpha2a Alone. [NCT00291616]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Repeated Dose Intrapleural Adenoviral-Mediated Interferon-beta (BG00001, Ad.hIFN-β for Pleural Malignancies [NCT00299962]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Dose Levels of Interferon Alfacon-1 (Infergen, CIFN) Plus Ribavirin Administered Daily for 48 Weeks Versus No Treatment in Hepatitis C Infected Patients Who Are Nonresponders to Pre [NCT00086541]Phase 3515 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose Finding Study of Subcutaneously Administered Interferon Beta-1a for Maintenance of Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease [NCT00304252]Phase 2192 participants Interventional2001-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Efficacy)
A Phase II Clinical Trial of a Timing/Schedule Optimized Combined-Modality Regimen: Cisplatin + Metronomic Low-Dose Interferon-α (IFN-α) Followed by Gemcitabine HCl (GEMZAR) in Combination With Mild, Fever-Range Whole-Body Hyperthermia (FR-WBH) in Patient [NCT00082862]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-07-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase IIb Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of NM283 and the Combination of Pegylated Interferon Plus NM283, in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Who Have Previously Failed to Respond to Standard Therapy [NCT00120861]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Chronic Hepatitis C: Treatment of (Peg)Interferon Alpha - Ribavirin Non-Responders With Pegylated Interferon alpha2b, Ribavirin, AdoMet and Betaine [NCT00310336]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Combined Treatment With Capecitabine and Immunotherapy Versus Immunotherapy Alone in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center phaseIII-Trial [NCT00311467]Phase 3172 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Terminated(stopped due to no patient recruitment)
A Phase II Dose Escalation Study of Continuous Daily Subcutaneous Administration of Interferon Alpha-2b in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00293527]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn in October 2006, no longer of interest)
A Pilot Safety Trial of STING-dependent Activators (STAVs) and Stimulated Dendritic Cells for Aggressive Relapsed/Refractory Leukemias [NCT05321940]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator decision)
Pilot Open Label Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Chemokine Modulation to Enhance the Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT03599453]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-09Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Erythropoietic Response in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Patients Receiving Combination Ribavirin (RBV)/Interferon (IFN) Therapy or RBV/PEG IFN [NCT00328549]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Phase I Study of EC90 With GPI-0100 Adjuvant Followed by EC17 With Cytokines (Interleukin-2 [IL-2] and Interferon-alpha [IFN-alpha]) in Patients With Refractory or Metastatic Cancer [NCT00329368]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Viramidine to Ribavirin in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00093093]Phase 3900 participants Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Belinostat as Consolidation Therapy With Zidovudine for Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma [NCT02737046]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-12Recruiting
Multi-Center Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Structured Treatment Interruptions With or Without Pegylated Interferon Alpha for HIV-Infected Patients After Prolonged Viral Suppression (ANRS 105 INTERVAC) [NCT00125814]Phase 3200 participants Interventional2001-12-31Terminated
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Benefits of Switching Therapy (Glatiramer Acetate or Interferon Beta-1a) to Natalizumab in Subjects With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01058005]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to significantly slower than expected enrollment, the Sponsor decided to terminate the study.)
An Open-label, Single-arm, Roll-over Trial of Telaprevir in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys) and Ribavirin (Copegus) for Subjects From the Control Group of the VX- 950-TiDP24-C216 Trial Who Failed Therapy for Virologic Reasons [NCT01054573]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Trial of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin in Combination With CTS-1027 in HCV Null-Responders [NCT01051921]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Treatment With Pegylated Interferon-Alpha2a, Ribavirin and Insulin Sensitizer Pioglitazone of Insulin Resistance (With the Exception of Diabetes) in Hepatitis C Virus Infection (The INSPIRED HCV Study) [NCT00433069]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Pegylated Interferon Therapy for Acute Hepatitis C Infection in HIV-infected Patients [NCT00132210]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Non-inferiority Phase III Clinical Trial of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha-2b Gel (ZK-A03) in Treatment of Herpes Zoster Before and After the Alteration of the Active Ingredient Manufacturer [NCT05806918]Phase 3368 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Bone Effects With Copaxone and Interferon in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study [NCT00490906]60 participants (Actual)Observational2007-06-30Completed
Phase I Evaluation of Sodium Stibogluconate in Combination With Interferon α-2b Followed by Cisplatin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine for Patients With Melanoma or Malignancies Potentially Responsive to SSG and/or Interferons [NCT00498979]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance of Combination Therapy of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) +-2A Interféron for Chronic Phase CML Patients Resistant or Refractory to IM Used as Single Therapy for at Least One Year [NCT00146913]Phase 230 participants Interventional2004-03-31Active, not recruiting
Phase 4 Comparative Study of Pegasys vs Peg-Intron for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 [NCT00502099]Phase 4217 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Pilot Study on Interferon Gamma in Association With Peg-Interferon Alpha 2a and Ribavirin Among Patients With a Chronic Hepatitis C and Non Responders to the Association of Peg-Interferon Alpha 2b or 2a and Ribavirin ANRS HC16 Gammatri [NCT00148863]Phase 265 participants Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Either 5-Fluorouracil, Recombinant Alfa-2a-Interferon and Intravenous Hydroxyurea With Filgrastim Support (FHIG) or Doxorubicin/Docetaxel (Dd) in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT00003172]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-12-31Completed
OUTPATIENT SUBCUTANEOUS IL-2 AND ALPHA INTERFERON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF METASTATIC CANCER [NCT00002504]Phase 20 participants Interventional1992-08-31Completed
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Versus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Alone for Treatment-naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00491244]Phase 4377 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Umifenovir as an Adjuvant Therapy Compared to the Control Therapeutic Regiment of Interferon Beta 1a, Lopinavir / Ritonavir and a Single Dose of Hydroxychloroquine in Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- [NCT04350684]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-15Enrolling by invitation
A Greek Observational Study on Relapse Rate and Sustained Virological Response in Naive CHC Patients, Treated With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin in Daily Clinical Practice [NCT00724464]332 participants (Actual)Observational2007-12-31Completed
Study to Investigate the Immune Response to Influenza Vaccine in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis on Teriflunomide Treatment and Using a Population of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis as a Reference [NCT01403376]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of a-Interferon With Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Velban, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) for Patients With Hodgkin's Disease [NCT01404936]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-07-31Completed
Phase III Study of Recombinant Human Interferon-alpha2a Versus Cyclosporin A for the Treatment of Ocular Behcet's Disease - a National,Randomised, Single-masked Controlled Trial (INCYTOB) [NCT00167583]Phase 337 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Concurrent Administration of Intravesical BCG & Interferon in the Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence of Superficial Transitional Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder [NCT00539773]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Dose Levels of Interferon Alfacon-1 (Infergen, CIFN) Plus Ribavirin Administered Daily for 48 Weeks Versus No Treatment in Hepatitis C Infected Patients Who Are Nonresponders to Pre [NCT00162734]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Mild Whole Body Hyperthermia Combined With 5-Fluorouracil/Interferon-a/Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Malignancy [NCT00178802]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-06-30Active, not recruiting
Antiviral & Antifibrotic Liver Therapy in HCV + Drinkers and Non-Drinkers [NCT00211848]Phase 2207 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Addition of IL-2 to Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a and Ribavirin for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients Non Responders to Three Months of Therapy With Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a and Ribavirin. ANRS HC09 SE [NCT00196586]Phase 275 participants Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Multi-Centered, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Significant Steatosis or NASH With Xenical Followed by Treatment of Hepatitis C (HCV) With PEG-Interferon Alpha-2a/Copegus [NCT00207311]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Pegylated Interferon and Thalidomide in Pretreated Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00238329]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
An Open Labelled, Active Controlled, Three Arm, Parallel- Group Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Renessans Administered Alone and in Combination With Standard Interferon Therapy in Patients Chronic HCV Hepatitis [NCT01463592]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Active, not recruiting
COPE-HCV: Continuous Interferon Delivery Via the Medtronic Paradigm Pump Infusion System Clinical Evaluation for Chronic HCV [NCT00919633]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs) on Patients With COVID-19 Infection: A Perspective, Open-labeled, Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT04251871]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-22Recruiting
A Phase 2b Study of Daclatasvir in Combination With Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 4 Infection [NCT01125189]Phase 2558 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
An Extension Study to Protocol VIR-NCHR-01 to Assess the Antiretrovirological Properties of a Therapeutic HIV Vaccine Candidate Based on Recombinant Fowlpox Virus (rFPV) (ITV Extension Study) [NCT00332930]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the FXR-agonist EYP001a in Chronically HBV Infected Subjects [NCT03272009]Phase 173 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-21Completed
A Swedish Multi-Centre, Prospective, Open Label Study: Safety of Avonex Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Are NAB Positive on Previous s.c Interferon Beta Therapy [NCT00493077]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Study of Treatment High Risk and/or Low Risk Acute Lymphoblastic leukémia(ALL) Adults Stage III [NCT00483132]Phase 3232 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-09-30Completed
An Open Label,Phase 3 Study of Telaprevir in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa 2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects Coinfected With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1(HCV/HIV-1) [NCT01467479]Phase 3185 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to It was decided by Sponsor on 13 January 2014 to terminate study early at primary efficacy endpoint as part of a decision to modify drug development plan.)
Open-Label, Phase 3b Study to Determine Efficacy and Safety of Telaprevir, Pegylated-Interferon-alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C and Human Immunodeficiency Vi [NCT01513941]Phase 3163 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
24 VS 48-WEEK TREATMENT WITH PEG-IFN ALPHA-2A IN PATIENTS WITH GENOTYPE 2/3 CHRONIC HEPATITIS C, RELAPSERS TO PEG-IFN + RIBAVIRIN TREATMENT. A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [NCT01517308]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Time elapsed to require permissions and a recent paper showed a high efficacy of a 48-week regimen in this setting. It seems non-ethical to start this trial)
Chemoprevention of Anal Neoplasia Arising Secondary to Anogenital Human Papillomavirus Infection in Persons With HIV Infection. [NCT00000764]Phase 198 participants InterventionalCompleted
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Low Dose Oral Interferon Alfa-n3 (Human Leukocyte Derived) in ARC Patients [NCT00002012]45 participants InterventionalCompleted
An Observational, Multi-Center, Cohort Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability in Korean Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Receiving Pegylated Interferon-alpha 2a (Pegasys®): TRACES STUDY [NCT01531166]500 participants (Actual)Observational2011-09-30Completed
Pilot Study of Interferon Alfa for Patients Who Have Received Cancer Vaccines [NCT02159482]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
A Multicenter Clinical Trial of Recombinant Human Interferon Gamma (Ingaron) in Pulmonary Tuberculosis [NCT06118619]350 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-06-01Recruiting
Combination Therapy With 9-(1,3-Dihydroxy-2-Propoxymethyl) Guanine (DHPG) and Interferon Beta for the Prevention of Relapse of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in Patients With the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome [NCT00002299]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Marrow-Ablative Chemo-Radiotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Interferon-Alpha Maintenance Treatment Versus Interferon-Alpha Maintenance Treatment Alone After a Chemotherapy-Induced Remission in Patients With Stages III or IV Fol [NCT00003152]Phase 3469 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-03-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Phase II Trials of CHOP Chemotherapy and Interferon Alpha or Rituximab Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody as Initial Treatment of Patients With Stage III and IV High-Risk Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma and Intermediate Grade B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00004039]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No patient accruals)
Randomised Multicentre Phase IV Study to Compare Glivec® (Imatinib Mesylate, STI571) in Monotherapy Versus Glivec® in Combination With Interferon Alpha at Low Doses in the Treatment of Newly-Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia [NCT00390897]Phase 4360 participants Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Non-Interventional Study Evaluating The Safety and Efficacy In Patients Receiving New PegIntron Pen for Hepatitis C [NCT01340573]3 participants (Actual)Observational2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated early due to low enrollment.)
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center, Phase 3, 2-arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Peg Interferon Alfa-2b Low-dose Maintenance Monotherapy Versus Standard Supportive Care in Patients With Cirrhotic Hepatitis C Co-infected With Human Immuno [NCT00381017]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Non-protocol feasibility)
A Phase I Study of AZT and Human Interferon Alpha (Recombinant Alpha-2A and Lymphoblastoid) in the Treatment of AIDS-Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00000725]Phase 156 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized, Phase IIb Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of the Combination of Pegylated Interferon Alfa Plus NM283 (Valopicitabine) in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00118768]Phase 2175 participants Interventional2005-08-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and the Antiviral Activity of NM283 When Administered Alone and in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2b to Treatment-Naive Adults With Genotype-1 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00120835]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Alpha Interferon (alphaIFN) In HIV-Related Malignancies - A Pediatric Oncology Group Wide Study [NCT00002621]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-12-31Completed
Triple Therapy With Peg-Interferon Alfa-2b/Ribavirin Plus Amantadine Compared to Standard Peg-Interferon Alfa-2b/Ribavirin for Previous HCV Non Responders ANRSHC03 BITRI [NCT00122629]Phase 3405 participants Interventional2000-10-31Terminated
Phase II Trial of 2-Fluorouracil Recombinant Alpha-2a-Interferon and Intravenous Hydroxyurea With Filgrastim in Patients With Refractory GI Malignancies Grant Application Title: Parenteral Hydroxyurea: A Modulator in Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00019474]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial of Intra-lesional Administration of TG1042 (Adenovirus-Interferon-gamma) in Patients With Relapsing Primary Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas. [NCT00394693]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial Of Combined Resection, Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, And Whole Abdominal Radiation For Treatment Of Peritoneal Mesothelioma [NCT00024271]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-05-31Active, not recruiting
Randomized Multicenter Treatment Optimization Study In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Interferon-a Vs. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Vs. High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed By Autografting And Interferon-a Maintainance In Early Chronic Phase [NCT00025402]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-07-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Interleukin-12 (NSC #672423, IND #6798) Followed by Interferon Alfa-2B in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00026143]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Interferon Alpha In Combination With Thalidomide In The Treatment Of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma A Randomized Phase II Study [NCT00027664]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-02-28Active, not recruiting
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (Rhu-GM-CSF) and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00011934]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Temozolomide (Temodar) and Peglated Interferon Alfa-2B (PEGIntron) in the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma [NCT00027742]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Therapeutic Safety and Efficacy of Combination Treatment With REP 2139-Ca and Pegasys in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT02726789]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Recombinant Human Interferon-gamma (rIFN-gamma) in HIV-Infected Children [NCT00000761]Phase 120 participants InterventionalCompleted
Pilot Study on Efficacy and Tolerance of Peg-interferon Alpha-2a (Pegasys) Added to Tenofovir DF and Emtricitabine (Truvada) in AGHBe Positive HBV-HIV Co-infected Patients. ANRS HB 01 EMVIPEG. [NCT00391638]Phase 2/Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
An Open Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Combination Therapy With AVONEX and Bi-Monthly High Dose Intravenous Methotrexate With Leucovorin Rescue in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00037102]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of SCH 54031 (Peg Interferon Alpha-2B/PEG-Intron) in Subjects With Interferon-Refractory Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00037882]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Terminated
A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Recombinant Tumor Necrosis Factor and Recombinant Human Interferon-gamma in Patients With AIDS Related Complex [NCT00001004]Phase 230 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II Clinical And Biologic Study Of The Combination Of Low Dose Interferon-Alpha And Thalidomide (NSC #66847) For Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Low-Grade Follicular Lymphoma [NCT00015912]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphomas at Advanced Stages: Prospective Randomized Comparison of Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy Followed by Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Maintenance With Interferon Alpha in First Remission After Initial Cytoreductive [NCT00016887]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Interferon Gamma-1b by Subcutaneous Injection for the Treatment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis [NCT00043342]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Antitumor Activity of Escalating Doses of Intravenous CCI-779 Given in Combination With Escalating Doses of Interferon-Alpha to Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer [NCT00045370]Phase 10 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Interferon Gamma-1b in Combination With Chemotherapy (Carboplatin/Paclitaxel) for First Line Therapy of Advanced Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma. [NCT00047632]Phase 3847 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Terminated(stopped due to futility)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Three-Arm, Phase IIIb Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Gamma-1b Alone, IFN-Gamma 1b With Azathioprine, and Azathioprine Alone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Receiving Prednisone [NCT00052039]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Study design changes were needed based on GIPF-001 results)
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Pilot Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of Interferon Gamma- 1b (IFN-y 1b) Plus Voriconazole Versus Placebo Plus Voriconazole In The Treatment Of Invasive Aspergillosis And Other Filamentous Fungal Infec [NCT00059878]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial Of Interferon Alfa-2B Or Interferon Alfa-2B Plus Bevacizumab In Patients With Advanced Renal Carcinoma [NCT00072046]Phase 3732 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of a Humanized Anti-Interferon-γ Monoclonal Antibody (HuZAF) Administered to Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease [NCT00072943]Phase 2175 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Phase II Open-Label Pilot Trial of the Antiretroviral Activity, Safety, and Tolerability of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2A (40KD) [PegasysTM] in HIV-1 Infected Subjects [NCT00078442]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial Using Fine Needle Aspiration For Evaluation of Hepatic Pharmacokinetics of MK-5172 in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT01547312]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Withdrawn
Randomized Study for Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Needing Treatment [NCT00140569]Phase 3400 participants Interventional1994-01-31Completed
A Randomised Trial of Lamivudine Plus Interferon Versus Lamivudine for the Treatment of HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) [NCT00140725]Phase 3160 participants Interventional2000-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Phase II Study of the Safety and Antifungal Activity of Subcutaneous Recombinant Interferon-Gamma 1b (rIFN-Gamma 1b) in Conjunction With Standard Therapy in Patients With Acute Cryptococcal Men [NCT00012467]Phase 260 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Combination Therapy With 5-Fluorouracil, Interferon-an Interleukin-2, and Thalidomide for Metastatic, Advanced or Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma. [NCT00277017]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Phase-I Study Of Cyclical Oral Administration Of Temozolomide In Combination With PEG12000-Interferon Alfa-2B In Patients With Refractory And/Or Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00014261]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Interferon Gamma-1b With Antimycobacterial in Previously Treated or Moderate to Severe Pulmonary Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) Infection [NCT00021567]Phase 220 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Evaluation of Interferon Alpha-2b and Thalidomide in Patients With Disseminated Malignant Melanoma, Phase II [NCT00026520]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Pilot Studies of Gamma Interferon Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00028275]Phase 220 participants Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study Of Interleukin-12-Primed Activated T Cells In Combination With 5FU, GM-CSF And Interferon Alfa-2b In Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Or Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00030342]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial Of Oral Bexarotene (Targretin) Combined With Interferon Alfa-2b (Intron-A) For Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00030849]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Open Label, Two Part, Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Tolerability of Interferon-Beta Gene Transfer (BG00001) in the Treatment of Recurrent or Progressive Grade III and Grade IV Gliomas [NCT00031083]Phase 112 participants Interventional2002-04-02Completed
Phase I Evaluation of Interferon-alpha-1b in Solid Tumors, Lymphoma or Myeloma [NCT00276536]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Phase II Study of Interferon Alpha and Isotretinoin in Patients With T-Cell Malignancies [NCT00038376]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional1990-05-08Completed
A Phase I-II Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Combined Administration With Pegylated Interferon-alpha2a and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi) Panobinostat for Reducing the Residual Reservoir of HIV-1 Infected Cells in cART-Treated [NCT02471430]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Active, not recruiting
Induction of Graft Versus Tumor Effect of Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b for Patients With Relapsed Hematological Malignancies After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02634294]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Protracted Infusional 5-Fluorouracil Plus Alpha Interferon for Advanced Metastatic Carcinoid [NCT00002470]Phase 20 participants Interventional1990-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomised, Open-label Phase IIb Clinical Trial Assessing the Effect of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®)180 μg Once Weekly for 48 Weeks in Addition to an Ongoing Nucelos(t)Ide Based Treatment on Quantitative HBsAg Levels in Patients [NCT01524679]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
"Ingested Interferon-Alpha: Prolongation or Permanence of the Honeymoon Phase in Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus" [NCT00024518]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Interferon-alpha, Interleukin-2 and 5-Fluorouracil vs. Interferon-alpha Alone in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00053820]Phase 3670 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Phase II Study Of Bevacizumab And PEG Interferon Alpha-2b (PEG Intron) In Patients With Metastatic, Or Unresectable Carcinoid Tumors [NCT00055809]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of the Safety of Subcutaneous Interferon Gamma-1b Combined With Rituximab in Patients With Low Grade/Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00057447]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Terminated(stopped due to administrative reasons)
Pharmacological Interactions Between Zidovudine and Ribavirin in HCV-HIV Co-Infected Patients Treated With Rebetron or Peg-Intron Plus Ribavirin [NCT00059358]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
An Open Label Pilot Study of Induction Therapy With a Single High Dose Bolus of Intravenous Methotrexate With Leucovorin Rescue, Prior to Initiation of AVONEX® Treatment, in Patients Presenting With a First Acute Demyelinating Event: Comparison With CHAMP [NCT00037115]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Pegylated Interferon-alpha-2 (PEG-IFN) to 'Low-dose' Interferon-alpha-2a in Patients With Malignant Melanoma in Stages IIA (T3a) - IIIB (AJCC 2002) [NCT00204529]Phase 3901 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Long-term Follow up of Patients Enrolled in the Pivotal Study of Betaseron® (Interferon Beta 1b) in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00206635]432 participants (Actual)Observational2005-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Maintenance Therapy With Rituximab After Induction Chemotherapy (R-CHOP vs. R-FC) for Elderly Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Not Suitable for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00209209]Phase 3570 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-01-14Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial Of Induction Therapy With EPOCH Chemotherapy And Maintenance Therapy With Combivir/Interferon ALPHA-2a For HTLV-1 Associated T-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00041327]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
[NCT00216775]50 participants (Actual)Observational2004-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Interferon Gamma-1b With Antimycobacterials in Previously Treated or Mod-to-Sev Pulmonary Mycobacterium Avium Complex Infection [NCT00043355]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
A Phase II Open Label Study to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Interferon-alpha in Combination With Imantinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Have Not Achieved a Complete Cytogenetic Response to Gleevec [NCT00045422]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Evaluation of a Multi-disciplinary Approach for the Treatment of Hepatitis C in IDUs (HI-LO Study) [NCT00399672]370 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Recombinant Interferon-Gamma 1b in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT00047645]Phase 3330 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
HEPMET-1: Evaluate the Feasibility, Mental Sideeffects and the Efficacy of Hepatitis C Treatment in a Methadone Maintenance Treated (MMT) Opioid Addicted Group. [NCT00147784]Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Randomized Double Blind Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Prazosin Versus Placebo Associated With Peg-Interferon Alpha 2b and Ribavirin for Initial Treatment of Patients With Hepatitis C With Genotype 1 or 4 and Severe Fibrosis [NCT00148837]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Active, not recruiting
Safety and Tolerability of Oral Two-Doses Estroprogestins Associated With Interferon-Beta 1a in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00151801]Phase 2200 participants Interventional2002-05-31Recruiting
Modulation of Death Effector Expression By Short-Term Exposure to Low-Dose Interferon [NCT00082719]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Analysis of the Duration of Combination Therapy That is Necessary for HCV Genotype 1 Eradication [NCT00152581]Phase 440 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Randomized Trial of Therapy of Early Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia With High-Dose Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) Alone or in Combination With Peg-Alpha Interferon (PEG-Intron) and Sargramostim (GM-CSF) [NCT00050531]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Recombinant Interferon Gamma-1b in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. [NCT00052052]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Adjuvant Interleukin-2, Interferon-alpha and 5-Fluorouracil for Patients With High Risk of Relapse After Surgical Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00053807]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
Phase II Trial of PEG-Intron in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00045279]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Tacrolimus Monotherapy in OLT Recipients With HCV Under Preemptive Treatment With Interferon and Ribavirin [NCT00167557]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The PI left the institution.)
A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial Investigating Methylprednisolone in Combination With Interferon-beta-1a for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00168766]Phase 4345 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Treatment Optimization Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) - Randomized Controlled Comparison of Imatinib vs. Imatinib/Interferon-alpha vs. Imatinib/Low-Dose AraC vs. Interferon-alpha Standard Therapy and Determination of the Role of Allografting in N [NCT00055874]Phase 31,551 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of 13-Cis Retinoic Acid, Alpha Interferon, Taxotere, and Estramustine (R.I.T.E.) for the Treatment of Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00176527]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Terminated(stopped due to accrual goal met)
A Phase II Trial of G3139 (Genasense) Anti-Bcl-2 Antisense Oligonucleotide Plus Alpha-Interferon in Metastatic Renal Cancer [NCT00059813]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety, Biology, and Clinical Effects of Interferon Gamma-1b Administered Subcutaneously to Patients With IPF Followed by an Open-Label Extension [NCT00047658]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Safety and Tolerability of Consensus Interferon-Alpha (CIFN) Plus Interferon Gamma-1b (IFN-γ 1b) With or Without Ribavirin (RBV) in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Who Are Non-Responders to PEG-IFN-a (2a or 2b) Plus RBV [NCT00084279]Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Randomized, Multicenter Study for Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Malignant Melanoma: Intermittent, High-Dose Intravenous Interferon Alpha-2b Versus Standard High-Dose Interferon Alpha-2b Therapy [NCT00226408]Phase 3600 participants Interventional2003-11-30Recruiting
A Study on the Viral Kinetics of Different Regimens of Pegylated Interferon and Lamivudine Combination Therapy in HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT00226447]Phase 230 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Phase 1-2 Study for Stage IV Breast and HER2/Neu Positive Cancers to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Vaccine Using Whole Cells From the SVBR- 1-GM Cell Line Genetically Engineered To Produce Granulocyte- Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor [NCT00095862]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-11-30Terminated
Phase II Trial of Capecitabine (Xeloda®) and Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2A(Pegasys®) for Recurrent or Progressive Brain Metastasis From Breast Carcinoma [NCT00227656]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Study slow to accrue.)
Phase II Trial of ZD1839 (IRESSA®) and Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2b (PEG-Intron™) in Unresectable or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00467077]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Protocol was closed due to slow accrual.)
Predictive Value of HBV pgRNA on Long-term Outcomes in Hepatitis B Patients Treated With Antiviral Therapy [NCT05965388]5,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
The Florida Melanoma Trial: A Phase I/II Trial of Post-Operative Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Concurrent Interferon-Alfa in the Treatment of Advanced Stage III Melanoma: Study Site & Coordinating Center [NCT00005615]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-07-31Completed
Neuroprotection With Riluzole in Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00501943]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Phase I Study of TH1 Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma [NCT05799612]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate Response Rates in Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) Patients Genotype 1 With Insulin Resistance and to Assess Prolonged Treatment Duration in Late Virological Responders [NCT00493805]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
Controlled High-risk Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study in Ongoing Neurologic Surveillance (CHAMPIONS10) [NCT00179478]Phase 4155 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Pilot Phase I/II Study of the Evaluation of Interferon Gamma-1b Administered Topically for Macular Edema/Intraretinal Schisis Cysts in Rod-Cone Dystrophy (RCD) and Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome (ESCS) [NCT02338973]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-14Terminated
SWITCH OR ADD PEGYLATED-INTERFERON IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS B PATIENTS ON LONG TERM NUCLEOS(T)IDE THERAPY (SWAP TRIAL) [NCT01928511]Phase 4254 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial on Lopinavir/ Ritonavir, Ribavirin and Interferon Beta 1b Combination Versus Lopinavir/ Ritonavir Alone, as Treatment for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection [NCT04276688]Phase 2127 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-10Completed
A Phase I/II Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of FP-1201 (Recombinant Human Interferon Beta) in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. [NCT00789685]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Pilot Study of IFN-alpha-2b Dose Reduction With Dose Optimization [NCT01460875]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-22Completed
Randomised Phase II Study of Postoperative Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy (Interferon/Fluorouracil Versus Low-dose Cisplatin/Fluorouracil) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus. [NCT01834963]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Comparator Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon - α2b in the Treatment of Adult Patients Diagnosed With SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) [NCT04480138]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-11Terminated(stopped due to Due to non availability of eligible subjects and slow recruitment)
Assessing Tolerability of Avonex Intramuscular Injections With a 25 Gauge Needle Versus 30 Gauge Needle [NCT01641120]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Compassionate Use Access to REP 2139-Mg for the Treatment of Chronic HBV Infection or Chronic HBV / HDV Co-infection [NCT05683548]0 participants Expanded AccessAvailable
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b in Early Primary Myelofibrosis [NCT01758588]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was suspended due to insufficient subject accrual.)
Nivolumab in Combination With Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil as Induction Therapy in Children and Adults With EBV-positive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [NCT06019130]Phase 257 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-10Recruiting
Multicenter Interventional Phase IV Study for the Assessment of the Effects on Patient's Satisfaction of Plegridy (Pre-filled Pen) in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Unsatisfied With Other Injectable Subcutaneous Interferons (PLATINUM [NCT02587065]Phase 4193 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-03Completed
Study on Screening, Verification and Intervention of High-risk Patients With Liver Cancer [NCT05721300]2,215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-10Recruiting
Treatment With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40 KD) (PEGASYS®) of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients, Who Have Failed Anti-viral Treatment. A Pilot Study. [NCT00226382]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Phase IV Study of Long Term Peg-Intron for Patients Who Have Failed to Respond to Rebetron/Interferon With Advanced Fibrosis and Cirrhosis Secondary to Hepatitis C- The Copilot Trial [NCT00179413]Phase 4549 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-15Completed
POST-OPERATIVE ADJUVANT INTERFERON-ALFA-2B (INTRON-A) TREATMENT AFTER RESECTION OF THICK PRIMARY MELANOMA AND/OR REGIONAL LYMPHNODE METASTASES 'INTERMEDIATE-HIGH DOSE' VS INTERMEDIATE-LOW DOSE' IFN-ALFA VS OBSERVATION: A 3-ARM MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED PHASE [NCT00002763]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I-II Study of Interferon-gamma Plus Weekly Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients With HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer [NCT03112590]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-23Completed
Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy With Recombinant Interferon-Alpha Following Curative Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00234182]Phase 1/Phase 284 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Non-interventional Safety Study to Investigate Pregnancy Outcomes in Female Patients Exposed to SC Peginterferon Beta-1a and IM Interferon Beta-1a Reported in a German Patient Support Program [NCT04655222]470 participants (Actual)Observational2021-04-30Completed
[NCT00239252]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Efficacy and Safety of a Hansenula-derived Pegylated Interferon α2a (Reiferon Retard®) in Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A National Multi-center Phase IV Open Label Non-Randomized Trial [NCT01649245]Phase 45,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon-alfa 2a in Polycythemia Vera Patients [NCT00241241]Phase 240 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Low Dose Interleukin 2 (IL-2)Monotherapy, Followed by IL-2 Plus PEG-IFN/RBV In Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype I Infection [NCT00277758]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient rate of volunteer accrual.)
A Multicentre Phase III Study of Interferon-beta-1a for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Asian Subjects [NCT00249860]Phase 3257 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Trial of Thalidomide, a- Interferon +/- Octreotide in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00250796]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Rituximab (Mabthera®) as Single Agent and in Combination With Interferon Alfa-2a (Roferon-A®), a Phase-III Randomized Trial in Patients With Follicular or Other CD20+ Low-grade (Indolent) Lymphoma [NCT01609010]Phase 3313 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Cytokines in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (MRCC): Intravenous Interleukin and Subcutaneous Interferon-α Versus Subcutaneous Interleukin and Interferon-α for Good Prognosis Patients [PERCY DUO] [NCT00416871]Phase 3220 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
Study of Parameters of Early Hepatitis C Virus Dynamics for Predicting the Outcome of Standard Interferon Therapy With Chinese Cohort [NCT01434212]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2010-05-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Cyclical Administration of Interferon β-1b in Multiple Sclerosis - Comparison With Normal Dose. [NCT00270816]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
PERCY QUATTRO: Medroxyprogesterone, Interferon Alpha-2a, Interleukin 2 or Combination of Both Cytokines in Patients With Metastatic Renal Carcinoma of Intermediate Prognosis [NCT00291369]Phase 3456 participants Interventional1999-12-31Completed
A Dose-Frequency Blinded, Multicenter, Extension Study to Determine the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a (BIIB017) in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01332019]Phase 31,077 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Pilot Safety and Tolerability Open-Label Study of Interferon Beta-1b in Combination With Tacrolimus in Patients Suffering From Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Failed Treatment With Approved Disease Modifying Agents [NCT00298662]Phase 230 participants Interventional2003-02-28Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Gamma Interferon (IFN-γ) Added to Bolus + Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (LV) +/- Bevacizumab (BV) in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00786643]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase 4 Open-Label Pilot Study of the Safety and Tolerability of High Dosage of CIFN Plus RBV Administered Daily for 48 Weeks in HCV Genotype 1 Infected Patients Who Are Nonresponders to Prior Pegylated Interferon Alfa Plus RBV Therapy [NCT00266318]Phase 440 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
[NCT00297570]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Recruiting
Medroxyprogesterone, Interferon Alpha-2a, Interleukin 2 or Combination of Both Cytokines in Patients With Metastatic Renal Carcinoma of Intermediate Prognosis [PERCY QUATTRO] [NCT00416429]Phase 3456 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
Bevacizumab, Dacarbazine and Interferon Alfa-2a Combination as a First-Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advancing or Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00308607]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Interferon Alpha-1b (IFN Alpha-1b) in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma [NCT00278174]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Randomized Study for the Assessment of Nitazoxanide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 [NCT01276756]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
[NCT00323505]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-finding Phase II Study of Subcutaneously Administered IFN-beta-1a in the Treatment of Patients With Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis [NCT00303381]Phase 2194 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, phaseIIIB, Two Arm Study Evaluating the Tolerability of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection co-Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Receiving HAART Versus Not Rece [NCT00296972]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2005-07-31Terminated(stopped due to not funded)
Therapy of Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) With SCH54031 (PEG Interferon Alpha 2B/PEG Intron) and Low-Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (Ara-C) [NCT00303290]Phase 176 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
14 vs 24 Weeks HCV Treatment to Genotype 2/3 Patients With Rapid Virological Response [NCT00308048]Phase 3435 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Prospectively Randomized Phase III Study on Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Adjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Patients With Operated Colon Carcinoma Dukes C (Stage III; T1-4, N1-30, M0). [NCT00309530]Phase 3598 participants Interventional1990-10-31Completed
Phase I Evaluation of Sodium Stibogluconate in Combination With Interferon α-2b for Solid Tumors, Lymphoma or Myeloma [NCT00311558]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated
A Scandinavian, Randomized, Rater-blinded Study of Single and Double-dose Betaferon in Patients With Early Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00313976]Phase 30 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A Monocentric, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Interferon-beta in the Treatment of Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ED)-Associated and Primary Intermediate Uveitis in Comparison to Standard Treatment (TEAM) [NCT00344253]Phase 319 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of FP-1201 (Intravenous Interferon-Beta-1a) to Prevent Toxicities After CD19-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy [NCT05936229]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Trial Testing Multiple Antigen-Engineered DC Followed by IFNa2b Boost for Immunization of HLA-Unrestricted Melanoma Patients [NCT01622933]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Observation Study of Different Optimized Therapy Method of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT01623778]67 participants (Actual)Observational2009-01-31Completed
Inflammation, Stress and Social Behavior: Using Ecological Assessments and Model Systems to Enhance Relevance to Health Outcomes [NCT01625793]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to New medication coming on the market, made study obsolete.)
Chemo-Immunotherapy: Observational Trial of Carboplatin-pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) or Doxorubicin Combination Chemotherapy With Tocilizumab, a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Against the Human Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Receptor, and Pegylated Interfer [NCT01637532]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Eine Phase II Studie über Interferon Gamma 1b Zur Behandlung Der steroidrefraktären Bronchiolitis Obliterans Nach Allogener SZT [NCT01639261]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Active, not recruiting
Chemo-Immunotherapy, Gemcitabine With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b (Peg-Intron) With and Without p53 Synthetic Long Peptide (p53 SLP) Vaccine, for Patients With Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer CHIP Trial [NCT01639885]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Vitamin D in Addition to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Compared to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4. [NCT01655966]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Labeled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon a-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Experienced Adult [NCT01854528]Phase 3148 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Phase III Randomized Study of Four Weeks of High Dose Interferon Alfa-2b in Stage T2bN0, T3a-bN0, T4a-bN0, and T1-4, N1a,2a (Microscopic) Melanoma [NCT00003641]Phase 31,150 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-25Active, not recruiting
CAMP-010: PHASE I/II STUDY OF IN VIVO PURGING FOLLOWED BY HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY, AUTOLOGOUS HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL INFUSION AND IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT00002761]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-02-29Withdrawn(stopped due to PI left institution)
A Multicenter Trial of Adjuvant Interferon Alfa-2b for Melanoma Patients With Early Lymph Node Metastasis Detected by Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy [NCT00004196]Phase 33,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
The Effect of Postoperative Interferon-alpha Treatment in Patients Underwent Curative Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With a Low miR-26 Expression: a Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT01681446]Phase 3296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
A Pilot Phase II Two-Arm, Randomized Clinical Trial of Concomitant Immunotherapy (With Interferon-Alpha and Retinoic Acid) and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer in India [NCT01276730]Phase 2209 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Study to Evaluate Cellular Adoptive Immunotherapy Using Polyclonal Autologous CD8+ Antigen-Specific T Cells for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma in Combination With MHC Class I Up-Regulation and the Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Avelumab [NCT02584829]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-06Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to loss in funding)
Natalizumab De-escalation to Interferon-beta-1b in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Swiss Multicenter Study Prospective, Controlled, Single-arm, Open-label, Multi-centre, Phase IV Study [NCT01701856]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Problems to recruit the needed number of patients in the planned time)
Assessment of Strategies for the Management of Flu-like Symptoms in MS Patients Commencing Treatment With Betaferon® [NCT01706055]629 participants (Actual)Observational2012-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating RNS60 Compared to Interferon Beta-1a (Avonex) for the Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01714089]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
An Open-Label Re-Treatment Study With PegInterferon Alfa-2a, Ribavirin and BMS-790052 With or Without BMS-650032 for Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT01428063]Phase 2276 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A MULTICENTER, PROSPECTIVE, OBSERVATIONAL, NON-INTERVENTIONAL COHORT STUDY IN CHINESE SUBJECTS WITH HBeAg NEGATIVE CHRONIC HEPATITIS B (CHB) RECEIVING THERAPY WITH PEGINTERFERON ALFA [NCT01730508]978 participants (Actual)Observational2012-11-20Completed
Is Hepcidin a Possible Contributor to Impaired Iron Mobilization and Anaemia in Hepatitis C Patients Treated With Pegylated Interferon Alpha and Ribavirin Therapy? A Pilot Study [NCT01726400]15 participants (Actual)Observational2012-12-31Completed
Treatment and Natural History Study of Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis [NCT00001379]Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-05-05Recruiting
Study of Parameters of Early Hepatitis C Virus Dynamics for Predicting the Outcome of Standard Interferon Therapy With Chinese Cohort (Second Phase) [NCT01760148]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-07-31Recruiting
BETASLEEP - SLEEP Quality and Functional Health Status, Fatigue, Comorbidities and Therapeutic Algorithms Among BETAferon® Treated MS Patients [NCT01766063]138 participants (Actual)Observational2012-12-06Completed
HBsAg Decline and HBeAg Seroconversion Following 48 Weeks Peg-interferon-α Treatment in Patients With e Antigen Positive Chronic Hepatitis B After Nucleoside Analogue Maintenance Therapy Compared to Continuing Nucleoside Analogue Treatment [NCT01769833]Phase 3144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Active, not recruiting
An Expanded Access Phase 2 Study of Sofosbuvir With Ribavirin and With or Without Pegylated Interferon for 24 Weeks in Subjects Who Have Undergone Liver Transplantation and Who Have Aggressive, Recurrent Hepatitis C Infection [NCT01779518]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A Phase II Randomized Study of Imatinib Versus High Dose Interferon as Adjuvant Therapy in KIT-mutated Patients With Resected Melanoma [NCT01782508]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
Pilot Single-center Open Study of the Effect of Ingaron on the Efficacy and Resistance to Antibiotics in Antibacterial Therapy in Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia [NCT05395702]114 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-12Completed
Randomized Trial of 24 or 48 Weeks of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1-infected Patients in Taiwan [NCT00495131]Phase 4308 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
a Multi-sites, Randomized, Parallel, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluated the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha-2b Gel (Yallaferon®) in HPV Infection [NCT01824992]Phase 2/Phase 3325 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Pharmacovigilance Study of the Interferon α 2b Produced by Bio-Manguinhos / Fiocruz and Used by Genotype 2/3 Chronic Hepatitis C Patients (Estudo de farmacovigilância da Alfainterferona 2b Humana Recombinante Produzida Por Bio-Manguinhos - Fiocruz, Utiliz [NCT01841775]Phase 485 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
BETAEVAL_Global- The New BETACONNECT® Auto-injector: Adherence and EVALuation of MS Patients Treated With Betaferon® [NCT02247310]498 participants (Actual)Observational2014-10-20Completed
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TMC435 Plus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin Administered for 12 Weeks in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Chronic Genotype 1 or Genotype 4 HCV Infection [NCT01846832]Phase 3232 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase 2 Study: Neoadjuvant Conditioning of Prostate Cancer Tumor Microenvironment Using a Novel Chemokine-Modulating Regimen [NCT03899987]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-29Suspended(stopped due to IFNa2b Supply Shortage)
A Phase IV, Open-label, Multicentre, International Trial of Response Guided Treatment With Directly Observed Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2b (PEG-IFN-alfa 2b) and Self Administered Ribavirin (RBV) for Patients With Chronic HCV Genotype 2 or 3 and Injection D [NCT01364090]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
The Fleming [FMTVDM] Directed CoVid-19 Treatment Protocol [NCT04349410]Phase 2/Phase 31,800 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-11Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Investigating AB-729, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogue and Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Treatment in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection [NCT04980482]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2A in Combination With Lamivudine or Entecavir Compared With Untreated Control Patients in Children With HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B in the Immune-Tolerant Phase [NCT02263079]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-16Completed
An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial on Interferon β-1b and Hydroxychloroquine Combination Versus Hydroxychloroquine Alone, as Treatment for COVID-19 Infection [NCT04350281]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-09Completed
International Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Crossover Study of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Tolerability of BCD-033 (CJSC BIOCAD, Russia) and Rebif® (Merck Serono S.p.А., Italy) After Single Subcutaneous Administration to Healthy Volunteer [NCT01766024]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
A Phase II Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Randomized, Dose-Ranging Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics Following 12 Weeks of Oral Administration of GSK2336805 With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Treat [NCT01648140]Phase 2286 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-01Completed
Combined Virological and Immunological Evaluation of Treatment of Patients With Early HTLV-1-Associated Myelopathy With Recombinant Human Interferon Beta-1a [NCT00001785]Phase 212 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
A Phase I Pilot Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Alfa-2b (IFN Alfa-2b) in Combination With Nucleoside Analog Therapy in Patients With Combined Hepatitis C (HCV) and Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infections [NCT00001035]Phase 110 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of RPC1063 Administered Orally To Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients [NCT02294058]Phase 31,346 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-03Completed
A Phase IV Study of Recombinant Human Gamma Interferon in Patients With Chronic Granulomatous Diseases of Childhood [NCT00001317]Phase 4100 participants Interventional1992-05-31Completed
Treatment of Multiply Drug Resistant Tuberculosis With Interferon Gamma: A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Trial [NCT00001407]Phase 230 participants Interventional1994-05-31Completed
Open-Label, Bridging Study to Determine Efficacy and Safety of Telaprevir, Pegylated-Interferon-alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment- Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Russian Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT01498068]Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Activation of Alveolar Macrophages by Aerosolized r-metHuIFN-Gamma (IFN-Gamma) in Patients With AIDS [NCT00002433]12 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Trial of Active Intralymphatic Immunotherapy With Interferon-Treated Cells and Cyclophosphamide [NCT00002475]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1991-04-30Completed
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL OF AUTOLOGOUS TUMOR CELL VACCINE [NCT00002505]Phase 20 participants Interventional1992-08-31Completed
ALPHA INTERFERON, TUMOR INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES, AND INTERLEUKIN-2 IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER [NCT00002733]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
Cohort Study on Efficacy and Safety of Interferon Intermittent Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT04028856]400 participants (Actual)Observational2018-06-01Completed
Prospective Study of Betaferon in Adherence, Coping and Nurse Support in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT01436838]110 participants (Actual)Observational2012-03-31Completed
An Integrated Phase II/III, Open Label, Randomized and Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CG0070 Adenovirus Vector Expressing GM-CSF in Patients With NMIBC With Carcinoma In Situ Disease Who Have Failed BCG [NCT01438112]Phase 2/Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Change in study design)
Directly Observed Hepatitis C Treatment in Methadone Clinics [NCT01442311]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Lambda Interferon Compared to Pegylated Alfa-2a Interferon, Each in Combination With Ribavirin, in the Treatment of Naive Genotype 1 or 4 Chronic Hepatitis C Subject [NCT01447394]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Withdrawn
Assessing the Effectiveness and Safety of Interferon Bladder Infusion for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT05912946]Phase 2/Phase 3129 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-15Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study on the Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon-Ribavirin-Boceprevir Triple Therapy in Patients Infected With Genotype 1 HCV With Cirrhosis and Awaiting Liver Transplantation (ANRS HC 29 BOCEPRETRANSPLANT) [NCT01463956]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-06Completed
The Predictive Values of Rapid Virus Response and Complete Early Virus Response for Sustained Virus Response in Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Individual Therapeutic Programme [NCT01464008]297 participants (Actual)Observational2004-01-31Completed
Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol-Interferon Alfa-2B (PEG-Intron, SCH 54031) vs. Interferon Alfa-2B for Treatment of Adult Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Not Previously Treated With Interferon: Dose Finding Study [NCT03537274]Phase 2/Phase 31,224 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-08-05Completed
Phase I-II Study of the Combination Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib Plus PEG-interferon in Advanced Melanoma Patients Harboring the V600BRAF Mutation [NCT01959633]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-03Completed
Parallel, Open-Label, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BMS-790052 and BMS-650032 in Combination in Null Responders to Standard of Care Infected With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 [NCT01012895]Phase 2215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Assessment of the Biochemical Response to Interferon-Gamma in Subjects With Specific Gene Mutation in Chronic Granulomatous Disease [NCT01147042]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-18Terminated(stopped due to Early termination due to only 2 subjects completing trial.)
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Three Preparations of Low-Dose Oral Alpha Interferon in HIV-Infected Patients With CD4+ Counts >= 50 and <= 350 Cells/mm3 [NCT00000844]560 participants InterventionalCompleted
Impact of Interleukin 28B (rs12979860) Genotype on Virological Responses in Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment [NCT03090035]Phase 398 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-01Completed
Evaluation of Treatment With Interferon, Octreotide, or Their Combination in Patients With Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome and Progressive Metastatic Non-B Islet Cell Neoplasm [NCT00001228]Phase 250 participants Interventional1988-10-25Completed
Treatment of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Infections With Interferon Gamma [NCT00001318]Phase 260 participants Interventional1992-08-31Completed
A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Retrovir ( AZT ) and HIVID ( ddC ) Versus Retrovir, HIVID, and Wellferon ( Interferon Alfa-n1 ) for the Treatment of HIV Infection [NCT00002086]Phase 2256 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase I Trial of Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (rHuGM-CSF), Recombinant Alpha Interferon and Azidothymidine (AZT) in AIDS-Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00000694]Phase 118 participants InterventionalCompleted
ALPHA INTERFERON AND CIS-RETINOIC ACID FOR THE TREATMENT OF SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS [NCT00002506]Phase 20 participants Interventional1992-08-31Completed
Standard Dose Versus Myeloablative Therapy for Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma, A Phase III Intergroup Study [NCT00002548]Phase 3899 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-01-31Completed
PHASE I STUDY OF INTERFERON ENHANCED INTRAPERITONEAL RADIOIMMUNO-CHEMOTHERAPY FOR OVARIAN CANCER [NCT00002734]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-03-31Completed
Combination Chemobiotherapy With Gemcitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, Interleukin-2 and Alpha Interferon in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Renal Cell Cancer. A Phase II Study [NCT00003664]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-10-31Active, not recruiting
Drug Repurposing Using Metformin for Improving the Therapeutic Outcome in Multiple Sclerosis Patients [NCT05298670]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
[NCT00004402]Phase 330 participants Interventional1999-11-30Completed
[NCT00004450]60 participants Interventional1998-08-31Completed
[NCT00004804]Phase 357 participants Interventional1993-08-31Completed
Effect of Interferon Alpha 2b Intensification on HIV-1 Residual Viremia in Individuals Suppressed on Antiretroviral Therapy [NCT01295515]Phase 1/Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-11Completed
Pilot Study on Innate Activation and Viral Control in HIV-Infected Adults Undergoing an Analytical Treatment Interruption After Administration of Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2b With Broadly HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies (3BNC117, 10-1074) [NCT03588715]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-18Active, not recruiting
The Observational Study of COVID-19 Infection and Its Clinical Prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Antiviral Therapy [NCT05792878]600 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-09-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Two Arm, Open Label, Twelve Week Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Rebif (New Formulation) (IFN Beta-1a) and Betaseron (IFN Beta-1b) in IFN-naive Subjects With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Followe [NCT00428584]Phase 3129 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Proline Interferon Alpha 2b (AOP2014) in Maintaining Deep Molecular Remissions in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Discontinue ABL-Kinase Inhibitor Therapy - a Randomized Phase III, Multicenter Trial With P [NCT03117816]Phase 3214 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-04Completed
An Open-label Multicenter Study to Assess Response to COVID-19 Vaccine in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Ofatumumab 20 mg Subcutaneously [NCT04878211]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-10Terminated(stopped due to Terminated by sponsor)
Plegridy™ (Peginterferon β-1a) Real World Effectiveness and Safety Observational Program [NCT02230969]1,208 participants (Actual)Observational2014-11-12Completed
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bromhexine Hydrochloride Tablets Combined With Standard Treatment/ Standard Treatment in Patients With Suspected and Mild Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) [NCT04273763]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade) and Interferon-alpha-2b in Malignant Melanoma. [NCT01462773]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Plus Postoperative Cisplatin, Interferon Alfa-2b, and 5-FU Combined With Radiation Treatment for Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT00068575]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Single Center, Prospective Phase IV, Open-Label, Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy , Tolerability, and Safety of Quadritherapy Regimen (Reiferon Retard® + Ribavirin + Nitazoxanide + Alfacalcidol ( Bon-One ®) ) Versus Triple Therapy Regimen (Reifer [NCT01896609]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
UARK 98-026, Total Therapy II - A Phase III Study for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Evaluating Anti-Angiogenesis With Thalidomide and Post-Transplant Consolidation Chemotherapy [NCT00083551]Phase 3668 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b (Peg-Intron (TM)) in Children With Diffuse Pontine Gliomas [NCT00036569]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
RESOunD: REbif Satisfaction On Discontinuing Oral Dimethyl Fumarate. A 24-week, Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Trial Evaluating Treatment Satisfaction in Subjects With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis Following Treatment Change From Tecfidera™ [NCT02117050]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Terminated(stopped due to recruitment challenges)
A Phase I/II Dose-Finding Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Anti-Leukemic Effects of STI571 (NSC 716051) in Combination With Interferon-alpha in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT00015847]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Terminated
A Phase 2 Study of Bevacizumab and Interferon-Alpha-2b in Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00026221]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Safety and Activity of Rituximab(HLX01) in Combination With Pegylated Interferon α-2b in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Indolent B-cell Lymphoma: a Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study [NCT04246359]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-15Recruiting
The Role Of Nitazoxanide, Interferon Alfa And Ribavirin In Treatment Of Hepatitis C Infected Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01770483]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Open Label Phase I Study of Single Agent Oral RG7388 in Patients With Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia (With Pilot Feasibility Study in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2a for Patients Who do Not Respond to the Single Agent at Eac [NCT02407080]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Pilot Study of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients With Xerostomia After Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer [NCT04489732]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Inhaled Interferon α2b for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) [NCT04988217]Phase 1/Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-15Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate ARC-520 Administered Alone and in Combination With Other Therapeutics in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infection (MONARCH) [NCT02577029]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Company decision to discontinue trial)
Feasibility of Assessing Drug Response to Precise Local Injection of Anti-cancer Drugs Using Presage's CIVO Device in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Undergoing Surgery. [NCT03056599]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Completed
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TG-2349 in Combination With Peg-interferon and Ribavirin in Treatment naïve East Asian Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b Infection. [NCT02340962]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Open-Label, Phase 3b Study To Determine Efficacy and Safety of Telaprevir, Pegylated-Interferon-alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infected, Stable Liver Transplant Subjects [NCT01571583]Phase 374 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
An Open-Label Safety and Tolerability Study of Nitazoxanide, Pegylated-Interferon Alfa 2a and Ribavirin in HIV/HCV Co-Infected Genotype 1 Prior Treatment Relapsers and Non-Responders [NCT01185028]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
COMparison Between All immunoTherapies for Multiple Sclerosis. An Observational Long-term Prospective Cohort Study of Safety, Efficacy and Patient's Satisfaction of MS Disease Modulatory Treatments in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03193866]3,526 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2017-06-02Active, not recruiting
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (Rhu-GM-CSF) With Interferon-Alpha (IFN-alpha) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00003561]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-02-28Terminated
Prospective Randomized Pilot Study of Daily Consensus Interferon (CIFN) and Ribavirin for 52 Wks vs Extended Duration 72 Wks Based on Virologic Response for the Initial Treatment of Difficult-to-treat Patients With Chronic HCV Genotype 1 [NCT00211692]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Nivolumab Plus 5-Fluorouracil Plus Interferon-α2b for Unresectable Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT04380545]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-13Recruiting
A Pilot Study to Characterize Interferon-Induced Gene Expression in Liver Cells and Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes Using High Density Oligonucleotide Microarray Expression Analysis in Caucasian and African American Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00324389]Phase 22 participants Interventional2006-05-31Completed
The Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Uveitis Using Topical Interferon Gamma [NCT01376362]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose Ranging Study of Alferon LDO (Low Dose Oral Interferon Alfa-n3 (Human Leukocyte Derived)) in HIV+ Subjects [NCT00002018]60 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase I Study To Determine the Safety of the Optimal Monocyte Activating Administration Schedule of Subcutaneous Human Recombinant Interferon-gamma in ZDV-Treated Patients With AIDS [NCT00001112]Phase 15 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase I Study of Alferon N Injection in Persons With Asymptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection [NCT00002078]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Open-label Pilot Study of Interferon Gamma-1b (Actimmune™) for the Treatment of Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA) [NCT01965327]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Study of ACTIMMUNE® (Interferon γ-1b) in Children and Young Adults With Friedreich's Ataxia [NCT02415127]Phase 392 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Safety and Tolerance of Zidovudine and Interferon-Alpha in HIV-Infected Children [NCT00000967]Phase 152 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Liver Transplantation [NCT00383864]Phase 455 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Study of Peg-interferon Treatment for Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues Suppressed Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Low Level Hepatitis Surface Antigen [NCT04035837]Phase 430,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-16Recruiting
S9805, Phase II Study of Tandem High Dose Melphalan Supported by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM) [NCT00003416]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-09-30Completed
Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma Patients With Regional Lymph Node Metastases With Interferon Alfa-2B vs. Biochemotherapy Using Cisplatin + Vinblastine + DTIC + Interferon Plus IL-2 [NCT00002882]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-11-30Completed
MYELOMA VII MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL WORKING PARTY ON LEUKEMIA IN ADULTS: MYELOMATOSIS THERAPY TRIAL [NCT00002599]Phase 3750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-09-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of Immunotherapy With Adenovirus-Interferon- Gamma (TG1041) in Patients With Malignant Melanoma [NCT00004016]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-04-30Completed
Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Multiple Myeloma Whose Disease Has Been Controlled With Chemotherapy: Rituximab Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody or Interferon Alpha 2-b as Maintenance Therapy [NCT00004040]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to no patient accruals)
A RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL OF INTERFERON ALPHA-2A WITH AND WITHOUT 13-CIS RETINOIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH PROGRESSIVE MEASURABLE METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA. Amendment Protocol: Extension to a Randomized Phase III Trial [NCT00002737]Phase 3320 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-03-31Completed
PHASE III TRIAL OF MELACINE PLUS INTERFERON ALFA-2B VERSUS INTERFERON ALFA-2B IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED MALIGNANT MELANOMA [NCT00002767]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-01-31Active, not recruiting
A CLINICAL TRIAL FOR PANCREAS CANCER USING ACTIVE INTRALYMPHATIC IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH INTERFERON-TREATED PANCREAS CANCER TISSUE CULTURE CELLS, GMCSF, AND LOW-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE [NCT00002773]Phase 20 participants Interventional1996-05-31Completed
Phase I Trial of rhIL-12 and rHuIFN-a2b in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Malignant Melanoma [NCT00004244]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Multiple-Dose,Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy and Safety Study of BG00012 in Children From 10 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, With Optional Open-Label Extension [NCT02283853]Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-28Active, not recruiting
Interferon Maintenance in Advanced Multiple Myeloma After Using High-Dose Melphalan as Myeloablative Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study [NCT00003007]Phase 20 participants Interventional1996-07-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Interleukin-12 Followed by Interferon-Alpha [NCT00003451]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY TO COMPARE LOW-DOSE INTERFERON-ALPHA-n1 (WELLFERON) +/- HYDROXYUREA VS HIGH-DOSE INTERFERON-ALPHA-n1 (WELLFERON) +/- HYDROXYUREA IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGONISED CHRONIC PHASE CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA [NCT00002869]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-04-30Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Melanoma With Subsequential High-Dose Subcutaneous Interferon Alfa-2b and High-Dose Bolus and Continuous Intravenous Interleukin-2 [NCT00003091]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Clinical Trial in Post-Surgical Melanoma Patients With Either DNP-Modified Autologous Tumor Vaccine or Interferon Alpha-2b [NCT00003715]Phase 2425 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated: recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or treated)
Non-interventional Study to Observe Triple Combination Therapy With Boceprevir or Simeprevir Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Re-treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Hungary (IMPERIAL) [NCT02118597]19 participants (Actual)Observational2014-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to the Sponsor's decision.)
[NCT00005665]Phase 20 participants InterventionalActive, not recruiting
Noninterventional Study on the Quality Assurance of the Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C With Peg-(40kd)-Interferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (e.g. Copegus®) With Main Focus Gastroenterologists - a Project in BNG (Association of German Resident Gastr [NCT02106156]10,228 participants (Actual)Observational2008-01-31Completed
A Phase 2/3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled (Part A) and Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled (Part B), Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPC1063 Administered Orally to Relapsing Multiple Scle [NCT02047734]Phase 31,320 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-03Completed
An Open-Label, Two-Arm Randomized Study to Characterize Flu-Like Symptoms in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients Transitioning From Current Interferon Beta Therapies to BIIB017 [NCT01939002]Phase 3251 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized and Parallel Group Phase IV Pilot Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in RRMS Patients Treated With Betaferon® [NCT00780455]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated
Open Label Phase I Study To Evaluate the Safety of Combination Therapy With AZT and Interferon-Beta in Patients With AIDS Related Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00000695]Phase 136 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT02359877]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
TREATMENT OF METASTATIC MELANOMA WITH DTIC, CDDP AND IFN ALPHA WITH OR WITHOUT IL-2: A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL [NCT00002669]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-06-30Completed
A Comparative Study of High-dose Interferon Alfa-2a and Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for Induction Therapy in Difficult to Treat Genotype 1 Patients With Chronic HCV [NCT00381953]Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Adjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003063]Phase 31,050 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1991-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Lambda/Ribavirin/Daclatasvir in Subjects With Chronic HCV Infection and Underlying Hemophilia Who Are Treatment Naïve or Are Prior Relapsers to Peginterferon Alfa-2a/Ribavirin [NCT01741545]Phase 371 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Prospective Phase IV Clinical Trial on Effectiveness of Rebif Treatment of CIS and RMS Patients in Romania Using Electronic Device RebiSmart™ [NCT02254304]Phase 4106 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Danish Study of Low-dose Interferon Alpha Versus Hydroxyurea in the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome Negative (Ph-)Chronic Myeloid Neoplasms. [NCT01387763]Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Phase I/IIa Study of SV-BR-1-GM in Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer Patients [NCT03066947]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-05Completed
Boceprevir/Peginterferon Alfa (PegIFN α)-2b/Ribavirin (Riba) in Difficult-to-Treat Menopausal Women With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 (Gt 1), Either Deemed Nonresponders to Peginterferon/Ribavirin or Treatment-naives (MEN_BOC) [NCT01457937]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Total Marrow Irradiation, Busulfan, and Alpha-Interferon Followed by Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell or Marrow Transplantation for Treatment of Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma. [NCT00003195]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-12-31Completed
Treatment Protocol for Patients With Standard Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Its Variants: Induction Using High-Dose Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone and Ethyol; Consolidation With Cytarabine and Idarubicin and Maintenance With 13 Cis Retinoic Acid and Alpha [NCT00003405]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment)
A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of VIR-2218 Alone or in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a [NCT04412863]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-03Active, not recruiting
An Investigation Into Beneficial Effects of Interferon Beta 1a, Compared to Interferon Beta 1b And The Base Therapeutic Regiment in Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04343768]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-09Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study: Efficacy of NA Combined With PEG-IFN-α2b Continuous Versus Pulsed Therapy for 96 Weeks in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. [NCT05922306]Early Phase 11,084 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of Low Dose Peginterferon Alfa-2b in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Over-Expressing Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor [NCT00049530]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-13Completed
Autologous and Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation for Low Grade Lymphoma [NCT00002829]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-02-28Completed
A Randomized Prospective Study of Early Intensification Versus Alternating Triple Therapy for Patients With Poor Prognosis Lymphoma [NCT00002835]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-10-30Completed
TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA WITH SUBCUTANEOUS RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN-2 AND INTERFERON ALPHA [NCT00002847]Phase 214 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Pilot Study of a Novel Four Drug Regimen for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: FUNIL-cRA [NCT00003585]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
Pilot Study of Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvesting for Autotransplantation of Adults With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and High Risk Acute Leukemia [NCT00004905]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Randomised Controlled Trial of CID (Chlorambucil, Idarubicin, Dexamethasone) Versus CD (Chlorambucil, Dexamethasone) for Induction of Remission in Low Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Kiel Classification) Followed by Randomised Controlled Assessment of Stand [NCT00003639]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-11-30Active, not recruiting
Directly Observed Therapy for the Delivery of HCV Therapy Among HCV-infected Individuals in Chennai, India [NCT02541409]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Phase 4 Study of Peg-interferon Plus Ribavirin Therapy for Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00375661]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of BIIB017 in Pediatric Subjects Aged 10 to Less Than 18 Years for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, [NCT03958877]Phase 3142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-18Recruiting
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Trial of Intratumoral Injections of TTI-621 in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Percutaneously-Accessible Solid Tumors and Mycosis Fungoides [NCT02890368]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated
Combination Therapy of Interferon Alfa-2b Plus Interleukin 2 and Hepatitis B Vaccine in Entecavir-experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With HBeAg Seroclearance: a Prospective, Randomized Open-label Trial (Endeavor Study, a Pilot Study) [NCT02360592]Phase 494 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Boceprevir, Pegylated-Interferon Alfa 2b and Ribavirin in HCV/HIV Coinfected Subjects [NCT01482767]Phase 3262 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Peginterferon Lambda-1a (Lambda) for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 With Non-critical Illness [NCT04388709]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to the number of competing trials at their site, the study team has closed enrollment and withdrawn this trial.)
A Phase 3b Study of 2 Treatment Durations of Telaprevir, Peg-IFN (Pegasys®), and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Treatment-Naive and Prior Relapser Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C and IL28B CC Genotype [NCT01459913]Phase 3239 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early by the sponsor on 13 January 2014 due to a decision to modify the drug development plan.)
A 2-Part, Open Label Study of Telaprevir in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Subjects Chronically Infected With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Following Liver Transplantation [NCT01467505]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early by the sponsor on 13 January 2014 due to a decision to modify the drug development plan.)
A Personalized Randomized Trial of Validation and Restoration of Immune Dysfunction in Severe Infections and Sepsis [NCT03332225]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-15Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of 4 Different Regimens of MK-7009 When Administered Concomitantly With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Ge [NCT00704405]Phase 2285 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-27Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Dose-effect Relationship Study of Hepalatide for Injection Combined With Pegylated Interferon in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT04426968]Phase 296 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-18Completed
A Phase 3, Matrix Design, Partially Double-Blind, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 50 mg Lonafarnib/100 mg Ritonavir BID With and Without 180 mcg PEG IFN-alfa-2a for 48 Weeks Compared With PEG IFN-alfa-2a Monotherapy and Placebo Treatment in [NCT03719313]Phase 3407 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Recombinant Alpha Interferon (IFN-A2b) and Zidovudine (AZT) in the Treatment of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) Complicating HIV-1 Infection [NCT00002270]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Prospective Comparative Study of Interferon α2a and Cyclosporine in Patients With Refractory Behçet's Disease Uveitis [NCT03209219]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-30Completed
A Phase 2a Open-label Study of the Oral Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Modulator EYP001a to Assess Its Safety and Anti-viral Effect in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Patients in Combination With Pegylated Interferon alpha2a (Peg-IFN) Alone and With Entecavir (ETV) [NCT04365933]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-25Completed
Multicenter, Safety and Efficacy, Open-Label Extension Study of ACTIMMUNE® (Interferon γ-1b) in Children and Young Adults With Friedreich's Ataxia [NCT02593773]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-25Completed
Phase I/II Study of Subcutaneous Administration of Pegylated-Interferon Alpha-2A (RO 25-8310) in Previously Untreated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00003542]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-05-31Completed
Open-label, Randomized, 2-arm, Active Comparator Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability in Portuguese Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Transitioning From Current Subcutaneous Interferon Therapy to Peginterferon Beta 1a (PLEGRID [NCT03177083]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-30Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Control, Multi-center Study of Recombinant Humanized Anti-PD-1 mAb for Injection Compared to High-Dose Interferon In Patients With Mucosal Melanoma That Has Been Removed by Surgery [NCT03178123]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-31Active, not recruiting
Autotransplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Followed by Immunotherapy With Ex-Vivo Expanded Autologous T Cells [NCT00003727]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Phase I-II Clinical Trial of Cisplatin (Platinol) Followed by Gemcitabine HCl (Gemzar) in Combination With Mild, Fever-Range Whole Body Hyperthermia (LL-WBH) at 40C in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00004063]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-08-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of High Dose Late Intensification Therapy in Patients With Chemotherapy Sensitive Multiple Myeloma [NCT00004903]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Active, not recruiting
PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED STUDY FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF THERAPY IN CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (CML): MULTICENTRIC STUDY FOR THE EVALUATION OF INTERFERON ALPHA VS ALLOGENIC BM TRANSPLANTATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY IN CML [NCT00002771]Phase 3750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bomedemstat (MK-3543/IMG-7289) Versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Participants With Essential Thrombocythemia Who Have an Inadequate [NCT06079879]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-27Not yet recruiting
A 6-month, Randomized, Active Comparator, Open-label, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes, Safety and Tolerability of (Fingolimod) 0.5 mg/Day in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Candidates for Multiple Sclerosis (MS [NCT01534182]Phase 4298 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
An Open Trial Combining Zidovudine, Interferon-alfa, and Recombinant CD4-IgG With Transplantation of Syngeneic Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes From Healthy gp160-Immunized Donors in the Treatment of Patients With HIV Infection [NCT00000647]6 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase II Trial of Sequential Modification of Immunosuppression, Interferon Alpha, and Promace-Cytabom For Treatment of Post-Cardiac Transplant Lymphoproliferation. [NCT00002657]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Mitoxantrone, Estramustine and Navelbine or 13-cis Retinoic Acid, Interferon and Paclitaxel in Patients With Metatstatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00005847]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-04-05Completed
A Prospective Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Assessing the Role of Post-Operative Radiotherapy Plus Adjuvant Interferon Alpha-2b in Patients With Cervical, Axillary, and Inguinal Nodal Metastasis From Cutaneous Melanoma [NCT00003444]Phase 3167 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-03-29Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Biochemotherapy With Cisplatin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine, IL-2 and Interferon A-2B Versus Cisplatin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00003027]Phase 3482 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-11-13Completed
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY TO COMPARE INTERFERON-ALPHA-n1 (WELLFERON) VS 'IDAC' CHEMOTHERAPY AND AUTOGRAFTING FOLLOWED BY INTERFERON ALPHA-n1 (WELLFERON) IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CHRONIC PHASE CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT00002868]Phase 3744 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-11-20Completed
Biochemotherapy With Temozolomide, Velban, Cisplatin, Interleukin-2, Interferon-alpha and Thalidomide for Metastatic Melanoma With Optional Intrathecal Interleukin-2 Treatment [NCT00505635]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
An Open Label, On-Treatment Trial to Assess the Effect of HIV-1 Coinfection on Therapeutic Responses Using Boceprevir, Peg-Interferon-alfa-2b and Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1, IFN Treatment-Naive Subjects With or Without HIV-1 [NCT01443923]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to complete enrollment due to newly approved treatment options.)
Clinical Trial of Low Dose Oral Interferon Alpha in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT01442779]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Boceprevir in Community Practice: Assessing Safety, Efficacy, Compliance and Quality of Life, Impact of an Education Program [NCT01405027]Phase 4197 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Multi-centre, Open Label, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between BI 207127 (600 mg t.i.d. or 600 mg b.i.d.) and BI 201335 (120 mg q.d.) Given in Combination With Ribavirin for 24 Weeks, and Their Combined Effect on the [NCT01525628]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Phase 2B, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Lambda (BMS-914143) Administered With Ribavirin Plus a Single Direct Antiviral Agent (BMS-790052 or BMS-650032) Versus Pegasys Administered With Ribavirin (Part A) an [NCT01795911]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Evaluation of Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Patients With/Without Substitution Therapy in Austria [NCT00725751]353 participants (Actual)Observational2007-09-30Completed
Pilot Phase I/II Study of the Treatment of Classic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy With Topical Interferon Gamma-1b [NCT01468337]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Telaprevir in Patients With Genotype 3 HCV: Pilot Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Predictability of Therapy in Patients Who Have Failed to Respond to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin [NCT02087111]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Randomized Trial of the European and American Osteosarcoma Study Group to Optimize Treatment Strategies for Resectable Osteosarcoma Based on Histological Response to Pre-operative Chemotherapy [NCT00134030]Phase 31,334 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-14Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Dose Ranging, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Different Doses of MK-5172 When Administered Concomitantly With Peginterferon Alfa-2b and Ribavirin in Treatment Naïve Subjects With Chronic Hepatiti [NCT01710501]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-07Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Determine the Effect of Actimmune® Dose Titration on the Severity and Incidence of Interferon Gamma-1b-Related Flu-Like Symptoms and the Pattern of Dropouts in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01929382]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Active, not recruiting
Retrospective Cohort to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Xiyanping Injection Combined With Conventional Treatment for New Coronavirus Infection Pneumonia (Common Type) [NCT04275388]426 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-05-15Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEG-Intron™ Versus PEGASYS™ in Subjects With HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B and HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Protocol No. MK-4031-376-00 (Also Known as SCH 054031, P08450) [NCT01641926]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-26Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment)
Immunotherapy for Autologous/Syngeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplant Patients as Treatment for Advanced Multiple Myeloma [NCT00006244]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b Versus Interferon Alfa Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Essential Thrombocythemia [NCT05395507]Phase 2194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A Prospective, Single-center Clinical Trial of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b Versus Interferon Alfa Therapy in the Treatment of Childhood and Adolescent Essential Thrombocythemia [NCT04226950]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-10Recruiting
Phase I Trial of Intravenous Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express Thyroidal Sodium Iodide Symporter (NIS) and Human Interferon Beta (hIFNb), in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer [NCT03120624]Phase 177 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-15Recruiting
Phase II Study of P1101 in Early Myelofibrosis [NCT02370329]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-12Active, not recruiting
A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-blind (Participant and Investigator Blind, Sponsor Open), Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Antiviral Activity of Oral ACH-0141625 in Combination With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a and Ribav [NCT01180790]Phase 2122 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of GSK2336805 in Combination With Peginterferon and Ribavirin in Treatment-naive Chronic Hepatitis C Subjects With Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1 or 4 [NCT01439373]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-07Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Combined Use of Interferon Beta-1a and Glatiramer Acetate to Either Agent Alone in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CombiRx) [NCT00211887]Phase 31,008 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With and Without Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon α-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve A [NCT01854697]Phase 3311 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Non-interventional, Observational Study on Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Previous Treatment Failure, Using Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin Based Regimens [NCT01798576]282 participants (Actual)Observational2012-11-30Terminated
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Antiviral Activity and Pharmacokinetics of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agent (DAA) Treatment in Combination With Peginterferon Alpha-2a and Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infected Subjects [NCT01609933]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-18Completed
A Phase I/II, Open Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination Therapy of: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a (Peg-IFN Alpha-2a) and Ribavirin (RBV) in Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infe [NCT01272310]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Active-Control Phase II Pilot Trial of Bavituximab Combined With Ribavirin for Initial Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection [NCT01273948]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Phase IIb, Open Label, Single Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effect of 48-weeks PEG-Interferon Alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) Administration on Serum HBsAg in Chronic Hepatitis B, HBeAg-Negative, Genotype D Patients on Treatment With Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues [NCT01706575]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Test Whether Systemic Interferon Gamma Increases Tumor Class I MHC Expression in Patients With Synovial Sarcoma and Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma [NCT01957709]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-25Terminated(stopped due to Enough samples were collected for data analysis.)
A Phase 1/2 Trial Evaluating αDC1 Vaccines Combined With Tumor-Selective Chemokine Modulation as Adjuvant Therapy After Surgical Resection of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies [NCT02151448]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Response-guided Triple-therapy Using Boceprevir in Combination With PEGIFN/RBV in HIV/HCV-coinfected Patients [NCT01925183]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase IIa, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of a 12 Weeks Combination Therapy of TMC647055 and TMC435 With and Without GSK23336805 With a Pharmacokinetic Enhancer With and Without Ribavirin in Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatit [NCT01724086]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Twice-Weekly Peginterferon Alpha 2a and Ribavirin Induction Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients Who Are Coinfected With HIV-1 [NCT00085917]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
PEG IFN-alpha2a (Pegasys®) Therapy in Patients With Chronic Myeloproliferative Diseases (Excluding Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia) [NCT00452023]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-07Completed
Prospective, Observational Study of Predictors of the Effectiveness of Pegylated Interferon in a Cohort of Patients With Hepatitis C in Georgia [NCT01659567]516 participants (Actual)Observational2011-04-06Completed
Phase II Study of Dexamethasone/Alpha-Interferon in AL Amyloidosis [NCT00002849]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-11-30Completed
Therapy of Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) With Alpha Interferon (IFN-A), Low-Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (ARA-C), and Homoharringtonine (HHT) [NCT00003239]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
Phase I Combined Modality Protocol for Malignant Mesothelioma: Cisplatin & rIFN-alpha-2b Followed by Surgical Resection (Debulking), and Post-Op Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Cisplatin, +/- rIFN-alpha-2b [NCT00003263]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
ProspeCtive Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and tOlerability of Dietary supplemeNT of Curcumin (BCM95) in Subjects With Active Relapsing MultIple Sclerosis Treated With subcutaNeous Interferon Beta 1a 44 mcg Three Times a Week (TIW) [NCT01514370]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Phase 3 Open Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon Lambda-1a, in Combination With Ribavirin and Daclatasvir, for Treatment of Chronic HCV Infection With Treatment naïve Genotypes 1, 2, 3 or 4 in Subjects Co-infected With H [NCT01866930]Phase 3453 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-11Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision not based on any new unexpected safety findings or efficacy observations.)
Type 1 Interferon as a Mucosal Adjuvant for Influenza Vaccine Given Intranasally [NCT00436046]Phase 195 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized Open-label Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Interferon-gamma in Combination With Anidulafungin for the Treatment of Candidemia [NCT01270490]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Recruiting
A Multicenter, Prospective Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Belgian Patients With CIS or RRMS in Whom Interferon Beta-1a IM Treatment Has Been Initiated [NCT01272128]100 participants (Actual)Observational2012-12-31Completed
A Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin With or Without CTS-1027 in HCV Null-Responders [NCT01273064]Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Risk-benefit ratio)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of BIIB033 in Subjects With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis When Used Concurrently With Avonex [NCT01864148]Phase 2419 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Real-World Study of Sequential Combination Therapy With Pegylated Interferon In Nucleoside-treated Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT03357822]Phase 42,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-25Recruiting
Subcutaneous (SC) Interferon Beta Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Characterization of Injection Site Reactions and Flu-Like Symptoms Under Daily Practice Setting [NCT03347370]626 participants (Actual)Observational2017-11-27Completed
Mechanism of Action of Ocrelizumab in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT03344094]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-10-12Recruiting
Human Recombinant Interferon Gamma in the Treatment of Ventilator-acquired Pneumonia in ICU Patients [NCT05843786]Phase 3132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-30Recruiting
A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Study Short Duration Versus Standard Response-Guided Therapy With MK-3034 (SCH 503034)/Boceprevir Combined With PegIntron and Ribavirin in Previously Untreated Non-Cirrhotic Subjects With Chronic HCV Genotype 1 in Asia [NCT01945294]Phase 3257 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-10Completed
Open-label, Multicenter, Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon Alfa-2a (PEGASYS®) in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis D (CHD) [NCT02732639]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of Escalating Single Dose & Multiple Dose by Using Recombinant Human Serum Albumin/Interferon alpha2b Fusion Protein in Hepatitits B Patients [NCT03294798]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-13Completed
Phase II Study of Recombinant Anti-tumor and Anti-virus Protein for Injection to Treat Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT02455596]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
An Open-Label, Phase 4 Study of Telaprevir, Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys®), and Ribavirin (Copegus®) in Treatment-Experienced Black/African American and Non-Black/African American Subjects With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Who Have Not Achieved a Sust [NCT01467492]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to It was decided by Sponsor on 13 January 2014 to terminate study early at primary efficacy endpoint as part of a decision to modify drug development plan.)
PROmyBETAapp: Ascertaining Medication Usage & Documentation of Patient Reported Outcomes Utilizing the myBETAapp® in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Betaferon®: a Pilot Study [NCT03134573]96 participants (Actual)Observational2017-09-15Completed
"Medical Treatment of High-Risk Neurofibromas in Patients With Type 1 Neurofibromatosis: A Clinical Trial of Sequential Medical Therapies" [NCT00846430]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
An Open Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of Interferon Gamma (Ingaron) Injections in Patients With Drug-resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis [NCT05359315]84 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-04-15Recruiting
A Trial of Prednisone and Acetaminophen Versus Acetaminophen Alone in Minimizing Flu-like Symptoms From Pegylated Interferon Beta-1a [NCT03424733]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-25Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies Combined With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT04943679]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-06-15Recruiting
A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of BRII-835 (VIR-2218) and Pegylated Interferon Alpha (PEG-IFNα) Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infection [NCT05970289]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-22Recruiting
Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 180 mcg Peginterferon Lambda-1a (Lambda) Subcutaneous Injection for 48 Weeks in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) Infection (LIMT-2) [NCT05070364]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-21Active, not recruiting
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens in the Treatment of Egyptian Patients With and Without Post-hepatitis C Cirrhosis [NCT02992457]Phase 410,000 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Safety and Efficacy Study of Boceprevir/Peginterferon Alfa-2a/Ribavirin in Chronic HCV Genotype 1 IL28B CC Subjects [NCT01544920]Phase 3737 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-30Completed
A Phase III Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of TMC435 Plus PegIFNα-2a (Pegasys) and Ribavirin (Copegus) Triple Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype-1 Infected Subjects Who Are Co-infected With Human Immunodeficiency V [NCT01479868]Phase 3109 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of the SV-BR-1-GM Regimen in HLA Matched Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Combination With Pembrolizumab [NCT04418219]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-21Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding Discontinued)
A Phase II Study of Type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell (aDC1) -Based Treatment in Combination With Tumor-Selective Chemokine Modulation (CKM: Interferon Alpha 2b, Rintatolimod and Celecoxib) in Melanoma Patients With Primary PD-1/PD-L1 Resistance [NCT04093323]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Suspended(stopped due to IFNa2b supply shortage)
Telaprevir in Combination With Standard of Care in Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation [NCT01821963]Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Low referral rate due to new therapeutic options.)
A Phase 3 Evaluation of BMS-790052 in Combination With Peg-Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 [NCT01448044]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A I//II Phase Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Interferon-Gamma by Subcutaneous Injection in the Complex Treatment of Patients Infected With HIV and Tuberculosis [NCT05065905]Phase 1/Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-19Completed
Interferon-α Prevents Leukemia Relapse of AML Patients Undergoing HLA-identical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Pretransplant MRD [NCT03121079]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Withdrawn(stopped due to there was almost no patient would enroll in this study.)
Early Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis Using Ultra Low-dose Chest CT to Predict Progression to Active Tuberculosis Among Contacts [NCT03220464]116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-20Recruiting
Pegylated Interferon +/- Ribavirin for Children With Hepatitis C [NCT00100659]Phase 3114 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Host Response to Tuberculosis and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome [NCT00201123]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Immune Response to Vaccination in Tecfidera® (BG00012)-Treated Versus Interferon-Treated Subjects With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis. [NCT02097849]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Phase II Trial of Chemoimmunotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Interferon-alfa-2b in Previously-treated Metastatic Gastrointestinal, Kidney, or Lung Cancer [NCT01658813]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Response to Peg-interferon and Ribavirin for the Treatment of HCV Infection in HIV Co-infected Patients, Implemented in Public Hospitals in Thailand [NCT02247440]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b in AJCC Stage III (TxN1-2M0) Melanoma Subjects After Regional Lymph Node Dissection in Russia [NCT02155322]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-19Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00003641 (2) [back to overview]5-year Relapse-free Survival Rate
NCT00003641 (2) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00003656 (4) [back to overview]Best Response as Measured by CT, Bone Scans, and Clinical Progression
NCT00003656 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Toxicity by Clinical Evaluation From First Dose to 30 Days After Last Dose
NCT00003656 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response (Progression-free Survival) as Measured by CT, Bone Scans, and Clinical Progression From Initiation of Therapy Until an Increase of ≥ 25% From the Smallest Sum of All Tumor Measurements Obtained During the Best Response
NCT00003656 (4) [back to overview]Change in Retinoic Acid Receptor Expression on Tissue as Measured by Number of Subjects With the Presence of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes During the First and Fifth Dose
NCT00004088 (2) [back to overview]Three-year Overall Survival
NCT00004088 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]5-year Relapse-Free Survival
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients <56 Years Old Experiencing Grade 3-4 Regimen Related Toxicity
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Initial Response to Therapy
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients ≥56 Years Old Experiencing Grade 3-4 Regimen Related Toxicity
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Alive and in Remission
NCT00006244 (6) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Major Cytogenetic Response After 6 and 12 Months of Treatment.
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Treatment-related Toxicity (i.e., Grade 3 or 4 Nonhematologic Toxicity) as Measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 (Phase I)
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Complete Cytogenetic Response at 6 and 12 Months (Phase II)
NCT00026221 (3) [back to overview]Comparison of Plasma Levels of VEGF Following Administration of Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination With IFN-alfa
NCT00026221 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00026221 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00036569 (5) [back to overview]Two Year Survival of Pediatric Patients With Diffuse Pontine Gliomas
NCT00036569 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00036569 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Metabolic and Biological Change in the Brainstem Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Techniques
NCT00036569 (5) [back to overview]Median Time to Progression
NCT00036569 (5) [back to overview]Mean Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Baseline and Follow-Up
NCT00047879 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00049530 (4) [back to overview]Non-progression Rate (Clinical Response to Peginterferon Alfa-2b)
NCT00049530 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00049530 (4) [back to overview]Plasma b-FGF Level Response
NCT00049530 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00050778 (5) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT00050778 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in MRI T2 Lesion Volume at Year 3
NCT00050778 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in T1 Cerebral Volume at Year 3
NCT00050778 (5) [back to overview]Probability of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at 3 Years After Initial Treatment
NCT00050778 (5) [back to overview]Probability of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)
NCT00062010 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00062010 (3) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00062010 (3) [back to overview]Response by RECIST Criteria (v 1.0)
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST)
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]European Quality of Life Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) - Index Score
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
NCT00065468 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00068575 (1) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00078338 (1) [back to overview]Time to First Relapse
NCT00083551 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment
NCT00083889 (24) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment
NCT00085436 (2) [back to overview]Clinical Response as Measured by RECIST
NCT00085436 (2) [back to overview]Immunity as Measured by T-cell and Antibody Responses to the Tumor
NCT00085917 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00085917 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Normalization of Liver Enzymes
NCT00085917 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00100659 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT00100659 (2) [back to overview]Sustained Viral Response (SVR)
NCT00110396 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Neutralising Antibody (NAb) Positive at Anytime During the Study
NCT00110396 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Binding Antibodies (BAb) at Week 96
NCT00110396 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Neutralising Antibody (NAb) Positive at the Week 96 Visit.
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Average of All Trough Plasma Concentrations
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Duration of Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival According to the Investigator Assessment (Second Intervention Period)
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Slope - Change in Trough Concentration/Cycle
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Disease Control (DC) According to Independent Central Review for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Tumor Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Time to Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) After Intervention for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00117637 (34) [back to overview]Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response for Participants With Stable Disease (N=37) Following Treatment
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Evaluated Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Best Overall Response for Participants
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Selected Grade 3-4 Adverse Events Using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
NCT00126594 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00134030 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival
NCT00134030 (3) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00134030 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0
NCT00179413 (3) [back to overview]Determination of the Effect of PEG-Intron 0.5mg Per kg Weekly sc Versus Colchicine 0.6mg Bid Daily on:
NCT00179413 (3) [back to overview]Development of Portal Hypertension
NCT00179413 (3) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Long Term Maintenance PEG-Intron in Patients With Cirrhosis
NCT00179478 (4) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT00179478 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Development of Clinical Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Over 10 Years
NCT00179478 (4) [back to overview]The Number of New or Enlarging MRI T2 Lesions at 10 Years
NCT00179478 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an EDSS > 3.5 at Study Completion
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Percentage Change of Brain Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of Volume of Black Holes From Screening MRI to Month 60
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of T2 Lesion Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60
NCT00185211 (11) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60
NCT00201123 (3) [back to overview]Chest Cavity Size
NCT00201123 (3) [back to overview]Sputum Conversion
NCT00201123 (3) [back to overview]Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) to Measure Flow of Cytometry and Cytokine Levels
NCT00211692 (4) [back to overview]Participants Achieving SVR Categorized by Time of Response
NCT00211692 (4) [back to overview]The Primary Endpoint Would be the Number Who Achieve a Sustained Virologic Response.
NCT00211692 (4) [back to overview]Overall Number of Serious Adverse Events
NCT00211692 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Early From Study Treatment
NCT00211887 (4) [back to overview]Change in MRI Composite Score
NCT00211887 (4) [back to overview]ARR - PDEs
NCT00211887 (4) [back to overview]Change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
NCT00211887 (4) [back to overview]Confirmed Progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale
NCT00235989 (2) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability as Defined by the Number of Subjects With Flu-like Syndrome, Fever, Myalgia, Injection Site Reactions, Injection Site Reactions Pain, Asthenia, Headache, Liver Function Abnormalities, and Bone Marrow Function Abnormalities
NCT00235989 (2) [back to overview]Frequency (Number of Patients Per Group Defined by Cut Off Values and Per Treatment Arm) of Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Titer to IFNB-1b
NCT00246324 (2) [back to overview]Gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+)Lesion Number Change.
NCT00246324 (2) [back to overview]Relapse Rates, Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Levels, Transendothelial Migration of Monocytes
NCT00262951 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients in Whom Tumor Was Resectable
NCT00262951 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00265395 (1) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response, Defined as a Plasma HCV-RNA (Hepatitis C Ribonucleic Acid) Level Below the LLQ (Lower Level of Quantitation) at 24 Weeks Post-treatment.
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC) (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates of Event Free Survival (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (First-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (First-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (First-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival Events (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00336479 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Week 12 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00336479 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse
NCT00336479 (5) [back to overview]Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir
NCT00336479 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00336479 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free of 3-month and 6-month Disability Progression Assessed With the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at the End of the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Number of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Lesions in Comparison With Baseline in the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Annualized Aggregate Relapse Rate (ARR) in the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Number of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Lesions in the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free of 3-month Disability Progression Assessed With the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at the End of the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00340834 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Annualized Aggregate Relapse Rate (ARR) in the Core and Extension Phases of the Study
NCT00363649 (5) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00363649 (5) [back to overview]Early Discontinuation
NCT00363649 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00363649 (5) [back to overview]Time to Complete Molecular Remission
NCT00363649 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate
NCT00367484 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Testing Positive for Neutralising Antibody (NAb)
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
NCT00370071 (12) [back to overview]Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
NCT00371761 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Combined Response Consisting of All Three Responses - (a) Serological Response, (b) Virological Response, and (c) Biochemical Response
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00372385 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Week 12 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00378599 (1) [back to overview]A Sustained Virologic Response (SVR), Defined as a Plasma HCV RNA Level Below the Lower Level of Quantitation (LLQ) at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Completion of Study Drug Dosing
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA
NCT00420784 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse
NCT00423800 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response
NCT00423800 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Virological Relapse
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Diameter of Injection Site Redness
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and 10 Minutes Post-injection Timepoints
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and Immediately After Injection Timepoints
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Change in Mean (mm) VAS for Pre-injection and Immediately After Injection Timepoints
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Change in Mean VAS at Pre-injection and 10 Minutes Post Injection
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Number of Pain Free Patients at 30 Minutes Post-injection
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Primary Outcome - Extension Phase: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Patients Reported Pain; Change in Mean VAS at Pre-injection and 30 Minutes Post Injection
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Diameter in Injection Site Redness
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Patient Reported Pain: Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and 30 Minutes Post-injection Timepoints
NCT00428584 (10) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Number of Pain Free Patients at 30 Minutes Post Injection
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Local and/or Systemic Solicited Symptoms After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza B at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Unsolicited Adverse Events After Intranasal Immunization
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza B at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Antibody Responses in Nasal Secretions to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization
NCT00436046 (8) [back to overview]Antibody Responses in Nasal Secretions to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Weight
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT Interval
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change in New T1 Gd+ Lesions From Baseline to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume From Baseline to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change in T2 Lesion Volume From Baseline to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v 4.0) Hematological or Liver Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percent Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Qualifying Relapse-free
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With no Active T1 Gd-Enhanced Lesions at Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With no Active T2 Lesions at Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Infections and Infestations System Organ Class (SOC)
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Infections and Infestations System Organ Class (SOC)
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions Per Participant Per Scan at Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Pulse Rate
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Time to Recovery From Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Temperature
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Weight
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period and OLE Period: Time to 3-Month Sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period and OLE Period: Time to First Qualifying Relapse
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT Interval
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Maximum Corrected QT Interval (QTc)
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Count, CD8+ Count, and CD19+ to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Changes in Lymphocytes, White Blood Cells (WBC), Neutrophils and Platelets Values From Baseline to Week 96
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions, Active Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions, and Time Constant 1 (T1) Gadolinium Enhanced (Gd+) Lesions Per Participant Per Scan
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Time to Recovery From Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Maximum Corrected QT Interval (Qtc)
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Temperature
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- Heart Rate
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Annualized Qualifying Relapse Rate
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- Heart Rate
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Pulse Rate
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Open Label Extension Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity
NCT00436826 (42) [back to overview]Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v 4.0) Hematological or Liver Toxicity
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Investigator Assessment Regarding Global Oral Changes.
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Total Surface Area of the Lips Covered by Warts
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Subject Questionnaire Regarding Global Oral Changes
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Investigator Assessment Regarding Changes in Warts
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Change in Total Oral Mucosal Area Covered by Warts.
NCT00454181 (6) [back to overview]Subject Questionnaire Regarding Changes in Warts
NCT00459667 (5) [back to overview]Liver Enzyme Elevations
NCT00459667 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Neutralizing Antibody Titer to IFNB-1b of Different Cut-off Values
NCT00459667 (5) [back to overview]Flu-like-syndrome
NCT00459667 (5) [back to overview]Injection-site Reactions
NCT00459667 (5) [back to overview]Hematological Abnormalities
NCT00467077 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response as Measured by RECIST Criteria
NCT00467077 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00467077 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00467077 (4) [back to overview]Six-month Progression-free Survival
NCT00470093 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity as Measured by Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events
NCT00470093 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate as Assessed by Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response by Bladé Criteria.
NCT00483938 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virological Responses (Groups A, B, C, D, E, and F)
NCT00483938 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (SVR) (Groups A and B)
NCT00483938 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With SVR (Groups C, D, E, and F)
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease)
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Cerebral MRI Assessment: Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Cerebral MRI Assessment: Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic [PK]: Teriflunomide Plasma Concentration
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Overview of Adverse Events [AE]
NCT00489489 (8) [back to overview]Overview of AE With Potential Risk of Occurrence
NCT00491179 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Histologic Response(HR)
NCT00491179 (2) [back to overview]1.Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 2.Number of Participants Who Droppoed Out of the Study Prematurely Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00491244 (2) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate
NCT00491244 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Event (AE)-Related Withdrawal Rate
NCT00493805 (2) [back to overview]Sustained Virological Response (PCR 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT00493805 (2) [back to overview]Early Virological Response in Participants With and Without Insulin Resistance
NCT00495131 (4) [back to overview]Sustained Biochemical Response
NCT00495131 (4) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response
NCT00495131 (4) [back to overview]Treatment-related Withdrawal Rate
NCT00495131 (4) [back to overview]Histologic Response
NCT00501644 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Response
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]MRI Parameter- Percent Brain Volume Change for 2 Years
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Normalized Grey Matter Volume
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]Changes in MS Functional Composite (MSFC)
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Normalized White Matter Volumes (nWMV)
NCT00501943 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (RNFL)
NCT00505635 (1) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00520403 (4) [back to overview]PFS - Time to Event
NCT00520403 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
NCT00520403 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
NCT00520403 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Year 2
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Constant 2 (MRI-T2) Hyperintense Lesion Volume at Year 2
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at Year 2
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)
NCT00530348 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Year 2
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With End of Treatment Response
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 48 After Completion of Treatment Among Subjects Who Completed Assigned Treatment
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Treatment
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Prior Relapsers With Undetectable HCV RNA
NCT00535847 (6) [back to overview]Cross Tabulation of Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR) and Sustained Viral Response (SVR) in With Prior Response
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biochemical Response
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Combined Response
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HBV-DNA < 200 IU/mL
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HBV-DNA Undetectable
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen (HBe or HBeAg) Loss
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Liver Biopsy Score
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]HBe Seroconversion
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBs) Seroconversion
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss
NCT00536263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus - Deoxyriboncleic Acid (HBV-DNA) <20,000 IU/mL
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Volume of Central Compartment (Vc) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Child Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Parent Quality of Life Assessments (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Median Steady State Trough Concentration of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experience Toxicity at or Above the Target Toxicity for Strata B1 and B2
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Probability of Event-free Survival (EFS) of Stratum A Participants
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Parent Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Systemic Clearance (CL) of Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Apparent Clearance (CL) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Interferon ɑ-2b
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]ɑ Half Life of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]BASC-2 Psychological Assessment (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]BRIEF Psychological Assessment (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Child Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Child Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Volume of Central Compartment (Vc) of Interferon ɑ-2b
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Parent Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Child Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Parent Quality of Life Assessments (Stratum B)
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Half-Life of Interferon ɑ-2b
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experience Toxicity at or Above the Target Toxicity for Stratum A Patients
NCT00539591 (23) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rate
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Year 2
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Constant 2 (MRI-T2) Hyperintense Lesion Volume at Year 2
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at Year 2
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)
NCT00548405 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Year 2
NCT00548847 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 6 Months (Evaluate Overall Responses; Perform Lab Experiments to Test Hypothesis That Exposure to Interferon-alpha and GM-CSF Up-regulates Co-stimulatory Molecule Expression on Relapsed Acute Leukemia Cells)
NCT00548847 (2) [back to overview]Efficacy of GM-CSF and Pegylated Interferon-alpha 2b When Administered to Patients With AML, ALL, Blast Phase CML, and MDS Relapse After Allogeneic Transplantation, Defined as Progression-free Survival of > 33% at 3 Months
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Central Review-based Progression-Free Survival
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete Response and Partial Response)
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Local Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessed)
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00577993 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival (10 Years) by Treatment
NCT00577993 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (10 Years) by Treatment
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response (SVR)
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Viral Response (Undetectable HCV RNA)
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Time to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Telaprevir
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough (Detectable HCV RNA)
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Average Steady-State Serum Concentration (Css,av) of Telaprevir
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to First Viral Response (Undetectable HCV RNA)
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Telaprevir on Day 15
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Pre-Dose Serum Concentration (C[0h]) of Telaprevir
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at Day 15
NCT00580801 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Telaprevir
NCT00594880 (3) [back to overview]HIV Viral Load < 400 Copies/ml
NCT00594880 (3) [back to overview]HIV Viral Load < 48 Copies/ml
NCT00594880 (3) [back to overview]HIV Viral Load < 400 Copies/ml
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in General Health Status as Assessed by the Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in General Health Status as Assessed by the Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Accumulation of Physical Disability Measured by the Number of Participants With Confirmed Progression of EDSS
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Disability as Assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Number of Enhancing Lesions on T1-Weighted Images
NCT00605215 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Number of New or Enlarging Hypointense Lesions on Enhanced T1 Scans
NCT00606086 (1) [back to overview]EVR (Early Virologic Response)
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Summary of Disease Progression in Study Participants, Intent-to-treat Population
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Summary of Cellular Immune Response to the Vaccination or Treatment (Percent Regulatory T-Cells Responses)
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Vaccine-Induced Increase of CD8 T-Cell Positive Response by Antigen
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Vaccine-Induced Increase of CD4 T-Cell Positive Response by Antigen
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting a Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Events by Preferred Term
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Best Overall Objective Response as Number of Participants Responding in the Intent-to-treat Population
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival Time by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) Criteria in the Intent-to-treat Population
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Best Overall Objective Response as Mean Duration of Response (Weeks) in the Intent-to-treat Population
NCT00613509 (9) [back to overview]Best Overall Objective Response in the Intent-to-treat Population
NCT00616434 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00616434 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response
NCT00616434 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease on Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) of ≥3 Points at Week 8
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 72
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 and at Week 12
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving Rapid Viral Response (RVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA 4 Weeks After Starting Study Treatment
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Treatment
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA 24 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Treatment
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Biochemical Response: Number of Subjects With Grade 3 and 4 Shifts From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Total Score
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Noninvasive Markers of Fibrosis: Number of Subjects With Improvement in FibroTest Analysis
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Treatment
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00627926 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse Planned and Viral Relapse Actual
NCT00631371 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Investigator-Assessment
NCT00631371 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Complete Response/Partial Response): Independent-Assessment
NCT00631371 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent-Assessment
NCT00631371 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Volume of T2 Lesions on MRI Scans of the Brain at Week 24
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions at Weeks
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Remained Relapse Free at Week 24
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Annualized Protocol Defined Relapse Rate at Week 24
NCT00676715 (6) [back to overview]Total Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions Observed by MRI Scans of the Brain
NCT00679289 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00679289 (3) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) With 95% Confidence Intervals
NCT00679289 (3) [back to overview]Maximum KW2871 Antibody Levels in Plasma Following the First Infusion
NCT00686517 (5) [back to overview]Virologic Response at 12 Months Post-treatment Follow-up (Long-term Response, [LTR]).
NCT00686517 (5) [back to overview]Virologic Response at the End of Treatment Follow-up (ETR)
NCT00686517 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Response (SR) at the End of the 6-month Follow-up Period
NCT00686517 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Presenting With Alanine Transferase (ALT) Level Normalization
NCT00686517 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT00686777 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (EOT) or Discontinuation
NCT00686777 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HCV-RNA Negativity at 24 Weeks of Treatment and at EOT
NCT00686777 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment
NCT00686881 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Metavir Inflammation Score
NCT00686881 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization of >16 Weeks Duration
NCT00686881 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Metavir Fibrosis Score
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum ALT
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response Rate
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Relapse Rate
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Normalization of Platelets
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Normalization of ALT
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Change in Social Functioning
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum HCV RNA Concentration
NCT00695019 (8) [back to overview]Change in Fibrotest Score
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ≥2-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ≥3-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving RVR
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Mean Log Change From Baseline in HCV RNA
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to AEs
NCT00704184 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 After 24 Weeks of Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d.
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Following Treatment With Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d.
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Following Treatment With Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d.
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving cEVR
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00704405 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing From Study Treatment Due to AEs
NCT00705224 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
NCT00705224 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study
NCT00705224 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
NCT00705224 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
NCT00705224 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
NCT00708500 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Undetectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 12 and at 72 Weeks After Randomization.
NCT00708500 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Early Virologic Response.
NCT00708500 (4) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) Rate in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population.
NCT00708500 (4) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) Rate in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population.
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
NCT00719264 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
NCT00723710 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment
NCT00724061 (1) [back to overview]Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Observed During Dose Escalation of PEG-IFN-α-2b
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on HCV Genotype at Baseline
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Study Treatment Dosage Modification
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on HCV-RNA Viral Load at Baseline
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Achievement of Rapid Virological Response
NCT00724464 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Liver Fibrosis Stage at Baseline
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With EOT Response by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype + Viral Load (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Gender (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Weight (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Race (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Gender (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation and Participants With Missing Data (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by EVR Type (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Gender (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Gender (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Status (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Liver Fibrosis Score (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Race (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Race (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Viral Load (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at Any Evaluation Point (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Compliance for Participants Achieving SVR Based on Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR) (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR Who Achieved SVR (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Relapse Rate by HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving EVR Who Achieved SVR (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Weight (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Race (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Achieving SVR Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation and Participants With Missing Data (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With End of Treatment (EOT) Response (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Treatment Due to Adverse Events (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at Any Evaluation Point, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Prior to Early Virologic Response (EVR) Evaluation (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Drug Due to Adverse Events by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight + Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype + Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving SVR (Stage 2)
NCT00724893 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With EVR by Selected Chronic HCV Genotypes (Stage 1)
NCT00725751 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Antiviral Treatment Who Were Also on Substitution Therapy
NCT00725751 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment With PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin
NCT00725751 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00726557 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Tolerated Treatment With PegIntron 1.5 mcg/kg/Week + Rebetol 10.6 mg/kg/Week
NCT00726557 (2) [back to overview]Number of Drug-substituted Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response (SVR) With PegIntron 1.5 μg/kg/Week and Rebetol (10.6 mg/kg/Day) in Substitution Centers Under Routine Conditions
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Duration
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to mRECIST
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
NCT00738530 (10) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
NCT00749684 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease Recurrence
NCT00749684 (2) [back to overview]Relapse Free Survival Time
NCT00784836 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Best Response (BR)
NCT00786643 (3) [back to overview]Early Response Rate (RR) (Stratum 1 Only)
NCT00789685 (3) [back to overview]All Cause Mortality Rate at 6 Months
NCT00789685 (3) [back to overview]Clinically Significant Treatment Emergent Events
NCT00789685 (3) [back to overview]All Cause Mortality at Day 28
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]OS - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Reponse (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]OS - Time to Event
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Progression Free at 12 and 24 Months
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Health Problems as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) by Visit
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive at 12 and 24 Months
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]PFS - Time to Event
NCT00796757 (9) [back to overview]PFS - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT00800735 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Adverse Event.
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Cerebral MRI Assessment: Total Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities [PCSA]
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Overview of 12-week Sustained Disability Progression
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Overview of Adverse Events [AE]
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Overview of AE With Potential Risk of Occurence
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Time to 12-week Sustained Disability Progression: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Disability Progression at Timepoints
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Cerebral MRI Assessment: Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease)
NCT00811395 (9) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Indicated No Difficulty With the Injection Procedure of the Manual Injection or the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Rated the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector Printed and DVD Training Materials as Very Effective
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Mean Score for Ease of Use Grading Scale
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Mean Pain Score After Injection
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Indicated a Preference for the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector Over the Manual Avonex Prefilled Syringe
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in the Main Subset With Overall Success Using the Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Initial Subset Who Were Satisfied With the Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Mean Score for Initial Subset on Autoinjector Instructions Grading Scale
NCT00828204 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No Erythema, Induration, or Tenderness, and Normal Temperature at the Injection Site After Injection With the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector
NCT00845676 (1) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00846430 (4) [back to overview]At Least 50% Shrinkage in Tumor Measurements by Physical Examination
NCT00846430 (4) [back to overview]No Reported Psychological Toxicity Based Upon Psychological Evaluations
NCT00846430 (4) [back to overview]Response by MRI Measurements
NCT00846430 (4) [back to overview]Improvement of Symptoms and Pain
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 log10 Maximal Decrease in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels During ABT-333 Treatment
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Mean Maximal Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels During ABT-333 Monotherapy Treatment
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Mean Maximal Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels Through Day 28
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose (AUC12) of ABT-333
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels ≤ 25 IU/mL (the Lower Limit of Quantitation [LLOQ]) at Day 28 or Final Visit
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels Through Day 28 or Final Visit
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resistance-Associated Variants in Non-structural Viral Protein 5B (NS5B) Through Day 28
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Pegylated Interferon (pegIFN)
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of ABT-333
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels ≤ 10 IU/mL (Lower Limit of Detection [LLOD]) at Day 28 or Final Visit
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Ribavirin (RBV)
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ABT-333
NCT00851890 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Maximal Phenotypic Resistance to ABT-333 >10 Fold Relative to Baseline Through Day 28
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Failure-free Survival (FFS)
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Expressions of c-Rel, IRF-4 and Other Molecular Events in Participants
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]The Effect of Valproic Acid Therapy on Persistence of Clonal Disease in Patients Who Achieve Clinical Remission
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Presence of Minimal Residual Disease at 3 and 6 Months of Maintained Remission and at 1 Year Post Initiation of Therapy
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Clinical Response to Protocol Therapy Who Lack IRF-4 and/or c-Rel Expression.
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Exhibiting NF-kB Inhibition Upon Treatment With AZT in Vivo
NCT00854581 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a > or = 3-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a > or = 2-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Viral Response
NCT00880763 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HCV RNA in log10 at Week 4
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Overview of Failures
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events [AE]
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR] - Poisson Regression Estimates
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Extension Treatment Period: Overview of AEs
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM] Scores
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Extension Treatment Period: ARR Poisson Regression Estimates
NCT00883337 (8) [back to overview]Core Treatment Period: Time to Failure: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Failure at Timepoints
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Incidence/Severity of Viral Respiratory Infections
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Negative Events Related to Cold/Flu Symptoms
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Symptom Incidence/Severity
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Acute Respiratory Illness
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Frequency of Influenza-like Illness
NCT00895947 (6) [back to overview]Impact of Cold/Flu Symptoms
NCT00906399 (4) [back to overview]Number of New Or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at 1 Year
NCT00906399 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Relapsed at 1 Year
NCT00906399 (4) [back to overview]Estimated Proportion of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression at 1 Year
NCT00906399 (4) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at 1 Year
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Overall Tumor Response
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00919633 (3) [back to overview]Early Virologic Response (EVR)
NCT00919633 (3) [back to overview]Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT00919633 (3) [back to overview]Viral Load: Incidence of Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00943761 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
NCT00943761 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event
NCT00943761 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event
NCT00943761 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR24)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]t1/2,ss for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Tmax for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Possible Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Standard of Care (SOC) With PegIFN α-2a and RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Tmax for RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Tmax, ss for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Tmax, ss for RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Week 2 Virological Response (W2VR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Week 4 Virological Response (W4VR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Assessment of Tolerability in Standard of Care (SOC) With PegIFN α -2a and RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Assessment of Tolerability in Triple Combination Therapy
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Possible Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Triple Combination Therapy
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]CL/F,ss for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]AUCτ,1 for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]AUCτ,1 for Ribavirin (RBV)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]AUCτ,ss of BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]AUCτ,ss of RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cavg for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cavg for RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HCV Viral Load
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmax of BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmax of RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmax,ss of BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmax,ss of RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmin,ss for BI 201335 ZW
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Cmin,ss for RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Complete Early Virological Response (cEVR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Day 28 Virologic Response
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Early Virological Response (EVR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]End of Treatment Response (ETR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Investigator Defined Drug-related Adverse Events in Standard of Care (SOC) With PegIFN α-2a and RBV
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Investigator Defined Drug-related Adverse Events in Triple Combination Therapy
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Rapid Virological Response (RVR)
NCT00947349 (33) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HCV Virologic Breakthrough or Incomplete Virologic Response/Rebound
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in log10 HCV-RNA at Treatment Week 4 (TW4)
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Randomized Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Boceprevir (Experimental) or Placebo (Control)
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR) at Follow-up Week 24 (FW24) Among Randomized Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Trial Medication
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR) Who Achieved SVR24
NCT00959699 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 12 (FW12)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Time to Reach a Plasma HCV RNA Level BLD While on Treatment
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Abnormalities and Study Medication Tolerabilities
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities Vital Signs, and Physical Examination
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Viral Load (HCV RNA) at All Visits During Treatment and Follow-up
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (6)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (5)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]End of Treatment Response (ETR)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Rapid Virological Response at Week 4 (RVR)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Virological Response at Week 24 (W24VR)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (4)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (3)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Sustained Virological Response (SVR24) at 24 Weeks After Completion of All Therapy
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Virological Response at Week 28 (W28VR)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Virological Response at Week 36 (W36VR)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (2)
NCT00984620 (16) [back to overview]Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (1)
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Study Entry
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin Level From Study Entry
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 2 or Higher
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HCV Genotype 1
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR)
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change in Fasting Insulin Level From Study Entry
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Change in log10 HCV Viral Load After 4 Weeks of Nitazoxanide (NTZ) Monotherapy.
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change in Fasting Glucose Level From Study Entry
NCT00991289 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed During Follow-Up
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Last Dose of Study Drug (SVR24 Actual)
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Log 10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Level
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Met a Virologic Stopping Rule That Required Them to Permanently Discontinue Telaprevir and Continue Pegylated Interferon (Peg-IFN) and Ribavirin (RBV) at Week 4 or Week 8
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values Over Time
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Met a Virologic Stopping Rule That Required Them to Permanently Discontinue All Study Drugs at Week 12, 24, or 36
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT01054573 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values of Less Than 25 IU/ml, Target Not Detected at Different Time Points
NCT01058005 (1) [back to overview]Incidence of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01064401 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Relapse-free at Week 144
NCT01064401 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 7.5 Point Worsening From Baseline in the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score at 96 Weeks
NCT01064401 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions up to Week 96
NCT01064401 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
NCT01064401 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression at 144 Weeks
NCT01071083 (2) [back to overview]Time Course to Return of Radiological and/or Clinical Evidence of Multiple Sclerosis Activity, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Met Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Clinical Relapse Rescue Criteria.
NCT01071083 (2) [back to overview]Time Course to Return of Radiological Activity, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Met Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Rescue Criteria.
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Non-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-NonCog) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Global Deterioration Scale Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-PLUS) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Score
NCT01075763 (9) [back to overview]Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) Score
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HBV-DNA Lowering to <3,400 IU/mL and to < 2,000 IU/mL
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Combined Response Using a Cut-Off for HBV-DNA Levels to 2,000 IU/mL
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HbsAg) Level at the End of Treatment
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at the End of the Follow-up Period
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Histological Response
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Lamivudine Genotype Resistance During PEG-IFN+LAM96 Combined Therapy
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HbsAg) and Hepatitis B Surface Antibodies (Anti-HBs) Seroconversion
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HBV-DNA Below Limit of Quantification
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at the End of Treatment
NCT01095835 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at 24 Weeks of Follow-up
NCT01100528 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01100528 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Toxicity or Grade 4 Adverse Events Via CTCAE Version 3.0
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR24)
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs), and Who Died
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Resistant Variants Associated With Virologic Failure
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With 12-week Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)
NCT01125189 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Number of Relapse-free Participants
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Time From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT01142466 (6) [back to overview]Mean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Number of Days Until First On-study Relapse
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Relapse Free Patients
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]MRI Parameters
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Relapses
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Number of Infections
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relapses
NCT01144052 (8) [back to overview]Number of Relapses
NCT01158534 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate Assessed by RECIST Criteria.
NCT01158534 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01158534 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01158534 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Statistically Significant Change in Cellular Immune Parameters From Baseline to 2 Months
NCT01158534 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 2: Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 2: RVR4
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1: Rapid Viral Response At Week 4 (RVR4)
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1: Safety
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1: cEVR
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 2: Safety
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1 And Segment 2: End Of Treatment Response
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1 And Segment 2: Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks (6 Months Post-dosing) (SVR24)
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1 And Segment 2: Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks (3 Months Post-dosing) (SVR12)
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1 And Segment 2: HCV RNA Change From Baseline
NCT01180790 (11) [back to overview]Segment 1 And Segment 2: HCV RNA Change From Baseline
NCT01185028 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01185028 (3) [back to overview]Sustained Viral Response Rate
NCT01185028 (3) [back to overview]Tolerability of Study Drug Measured as Discontinuation.
NCT01192698 (1) [back to overview]HCV RNA Result
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Scale (EuroQol) 5-Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L)
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Number of Relapse-Free (Documented) Subjects
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Mean Number of Relapses Per Subject
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Progression of Disability (Kaplan-Meier Curves)
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Time to First Documented Relapse
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Number of New or Extended Lesions by T1- and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Measured Lesion Load (T2)
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Measurement and Evaluation of Cognitive Ability by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) Total Score At Week 96
NCT01198132 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Abnormal Clinical Laboratory
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Month 18
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Month 24
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Center for State-trait Anger Expression Inventory 2 (STAXI-state) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Emotional Abrasion Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the Depressive Mood Scale (Echelle d'Humeur Depressive [EHD]) Scale at Month 12
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24
NCT01201343 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI State) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Drugs (SVR12 Planned)
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Failure Which Required Them to Permanently Discontinue All Study Drugs
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed During Follow-up Period
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values of Less Than 25 IU/ml, Target Not Detected, at Different Time Points.
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants of Each IL28B Genotype Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Medication (SVR12 Planned)
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 72 Weeks After the Start of Study Medication (SVR72 Planned)
NCT01241760 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Drugs (SVR24 Planned)
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Double-Blind Treatment
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Number of New, and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double Blind Treatment
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Exposure to Ocrelizumab (Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve, AUC)
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at 96 Weeks
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Brain Volume as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 24 to Week 96
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double-Blind Treatment
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) up to Week 96
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) for at Least 12 Weeks
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 12 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 24 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score to Week 96
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 96
NCT01247324 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ocrelizumab
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Time to Relapse: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of no Relapse at Week 24, 48, and 72
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per MRI Scan
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease) at Week 24
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)
NCT01252355 (7) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (Poisson Regression Estimates)
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Who Died During Follow-up Period
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Treatment-related AEs and Who Died During Treatment Period
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR) at Week 12 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR) at Week 12 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2
NCT01257204 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Total Symptom Score (TSS)
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression of Disease or Death
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Hematological and Non-hematological Events
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)
NCT01259856 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events After Therapy
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]Change in FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) Total Score From Baseline to 3 Months
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival (RFS; Arm A [HIP] vs. Arm B [HDI])
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival (RFS; Arm B [HDI] vs. Arm C [LIP])
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]Change in FACT-BRM (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Biologic Response Modifiers) Total Score From Baseline to 3 Months
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]Change in FACIT-D (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Diarrhea) Diarrhea Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 Months
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate (Arm B [HDI] vs. Arm C [LIP])
NCT01274338 (7) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate (Arm A [HIP] vs. Arm B [HDI])
NCT01276756 (5) [back to overview]End-of-treatment Response
NCT01276756 (5) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response
NCT01276756 (5) [back to overview]Rapid Virological Response
NCT01276756 (5) [back to overview]Safety of Nitazoxanide (Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events)
NCT01276756 (5) [back to overview]Early Virological Response
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events
NCT01280656 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of T1 Hypo Intense Lesions at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of T2 Lesions at Week 48 (T2 Burden of Disease)
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Total Number of Reported Relapses at All Time Points up to 48 Weeks
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Free Status (Alternate Definition) at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Mean Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions Per Subject Per Scan at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Number od Subjects With Confirmed EDSS Progression
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Free Status up to Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Relapse
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Free From New T1 Hypointense Lesions (Black Holes) at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Free From T1 Gadolinium Enhancing Lesions at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Treated With Glucocorticoids Due to Relapses
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Cumulative Number of New Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Free From Any Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Cumulative Number of Relaxation Time 1 (T1) Gadolinium Enhancing Lesions at Week 48
NCT01285401 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of New T1 Hypointense Lesions (Black Holes) at Week 48 Within the Subgroup of New or Enlarging Non-enhancing T2 Lesions
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Demonstrating Viral Relapse
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 24 Hrs (AUC24h) for TMC435
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of TMC435
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) During Treatment and at the End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than or Equal to 2 log10 IU/mL Drop From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) at Each Time Point During Treatment and Follow-up
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline Who Achieved Normal ALT Levels at the End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (SVR24)
NCT01290731 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (SVR12)
NCT01295515 (5) [back to overview]Pre- and Post- Interferon Alpha on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
NCT01295515 (5) [back to overview]Fold Change in Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) and Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Genetic Variation in Individuals Undergoing Interferon Therapy
NCT01295515 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Table for Grading Adult Adverse Events.
NCT01295515 (5) [back to overview]Pre-and Post- Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) in HIV-infected Individuals
NCT01295515 (5) [back to overview]Pre- and Post- Interferon Alpha on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) Post-dose of ABT-267
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks (SVR12) Post-pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) Dosing
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of ABT-267
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks (SVR24) Post-pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) Dosing
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Suppression of Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Partial Early Virologic Response (pEVR)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Pegylated Interferon (pegIFN)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Plasma Concentrations of Ribavirin (RBV)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With 4-week Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT01314261 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ABT-267
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Serious AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Kidney Function and Other Blood Chemistry
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Gd-Enhancing Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Liver Function Laboratory Values
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Urinalysis
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Percentage Change of Whole Brain Volume
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Convenient or Inconvenient Is It to Take Your Medication as Instructed?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Convenient or Inconvenient Is It to Take Your Medication Every 2 Weeks?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Likely Would You Be to Continue to Use This Medication?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Injection Frequency (Every 2 Weeks)?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Tolerable or Intolerable Do You Find the Medication?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: I Am Satisfied With the Dosing Frequency of This Medication.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Main Reason for Missed Injections
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Over the Past 4 Weeks, Did You Miss Any of Your Injections?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With This Medication?
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: The Twice a Month Dosing Enables Me to Be More Spontaneous and Flexible.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: The Twice a Month Dosing Makes It More Convenient for Me to Travel/Vacation.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Enables Me to Focus More on Myself and My Family Rather Than My MS.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Improves My Self-Confidence and Self-Reliance.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Makes It Easy For Me to Carry Out My Daily Responsibilities.
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Time to Sustained Disability Progression
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Volume of Gd-Enhancing Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Volume of T1 Hypointense Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Volume of T2 Hyperintense Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index Score
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of Relapses Requiring IV Steroid Use
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of MS-Related Hospitalizations
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 Physical Score
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of New Active Lesions
NCT01332019 (39) [back to overview]Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Spatial Recall Test (SPART) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in the Volume of Total T1 Hypointense Lesions
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in the Percentage of Brain Volume Change
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Word List Generation (WLG)
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in the Volume of Total T2 Lesions
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-D) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Consistent Long Term Retrieval (SRT-CLTR) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 3 Seconds (PASAT 3) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 2 (PASAT 2) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in DKEFS Condition 2: Sort Recognition, Sort Recognition Description Score- Card Set 1+2
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in the Number of New T2 Lesions
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in DKEFS Condition 1: Free Sorting, Free Sorting, Description Score, Card Set 1+2
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Condition 1: Free Sorting, Confirmed Correct Sort- Card Set 1+2
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Changes in Quality of Life, by Means of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQoL-54)
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Long-Term Storage (SRT-LTS) Raw Score
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in the Number of T1 Gd+ Enhancing Lesions
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Spatial Recall Test - Delayed Recall (SPART-D)
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (mFIS, Total Score and Scores of the 3 Individual Domains).
NCT01333501 (21) [back to overview]Changes in the Environmental Status Scale Score (ESS)
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Median Time to First Achievement of Undetectable HCV RNA During Treatment
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Viral Response (cEVR)
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Viral Response (RVR)
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the End of Study Therapy (SVR12)
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the End of Study Therapy (SVR24)
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 72
NCT01353911 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Medication Due to AEs During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
NCT01355289 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Local Platelet Count by Visit During Treatment Period A1 of Core Study
NCT01355289 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Initiated Antiviral Treatment by Day 21 of Period A1 of Core Study
NCT01355289 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Response (Greater Than or Equal to 100 x 10^9/L) by Day 21 of Treatment Period A1 of Core Study
NCT01355289 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Count Greater Than 30 X 10^9/L From Baseline to Day 21 During Treatment Period A1 of Core Study
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, When SVR12=NO
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, SVR12=YES
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=YES
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]Early Treatment Success (ETS)
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]Virological Response After 24 Weeks of Treatment Discontinuation (SVR24)
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, When SVR12=NO
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=NO
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=YES
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=NO
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, SVR12=YES
NCT01358864 (11) [back to overview]Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR12)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Treatment Related Toxicity
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01364090 (1) [back to overview]Treatment Efficacy
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With a Visual Loss of 15 or More Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letters in the Study Eye
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
NCT01376362 (17) [back to overview]Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
NCT01389323 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) With rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms at Baseline in the Interleukin-28B Gene
NCT01389323 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels
NCT01389323 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels
NCT01389323 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and Who Died
NCT01389323 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12)
NCT01403376 (5) [back to overview]Geometric Mean of Titers (GMT) Ratio Post/Pre Vaccination
NCT01403376 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With 2 Fold or More Increase in Antibody Titer at 28 Days Post Vaccination
NCT01403376 (5) [back to overview]Immunoglobulin Levels
NCT01403376 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With 4 Fold or More Increase in Antibody Titer at 28 Days Post Vaccination
NCT01403376 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Antibody Titer ≥40 at 28 Days Post Vaccination
NCT01404936 (1) [back to overview]Participants' Response
NCT01405027 (5) [back to overview]Drug Exposure
NCT01405027 (5) [back to overview]Determination of the Rate of Sustained Viral Response (SVR) for HCV Patients Treated With Boceprevir, Peginterferon and Ribavirin at Community Sites and at HCEEs.
NCT01405027 (5) [back to overview]Treatment Duration Compliance Rate
NCT01405027 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01405027 (5) [back to overview]Short Form Health Survey Measuring Quality of Life Reported at Baseline, End of Treatment, and Follow-up Week 24 (36 Multiple Choice Questions)
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ocrelizumab
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 96
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score to Week 96
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 24 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) up to Week 96
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Exposure to Ocrelizumab (Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve, AUC)
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Number of New, and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double Blind Treatment
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at 96 Weeks
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double-Blind Treatment
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Double-Blind Treatment
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Brain Volume as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 24 to Week 96
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) for at Least 12 Weeks
NCT01412333 (14) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 12 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Other Than Genotype 1 With Sustained Virologic Response at Post Treatment Week 12 (SVR12)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With End of the Treatment Response (EOTR)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Post Treatment Week 4
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Post Treatment Week 24 (SVR24)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 12 (SVR12) for All Nonresponders With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)
NCT01428063 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Who Died During the Study
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Median Serum Alanine Aminotransferase at Baseline, Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Median Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of GSK2336805 and Lag Time Before First Observation of Quantifiable Concentration (Tlag) at Day 1
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participant Achieving Rapid Virological Response (RVR) at Day 28, Nominal Analysis
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participant Achieving RVR at Day 28, (Primary and Supportive Analyses)
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Treatment Period
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 With Virologic Response
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Toxicity Grade for Serum Chemistry Parameters for Day 1 to Day 28
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Toxicity Grade Hematology Parameters for Day 1 to Day 28
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts in Urinalysis Parameters From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of GSK2336805
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Probability of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 Achieving RVR At Day 28, Nominal Analysis
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Probability of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 Achieving RVR at Day 28, Primary and Supportive Analyses
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HCV Viral Load During 24 Hour (h) Following a Single Dose of GSK2336805 on the Log 10 Scale
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QTcF Interval at Day 2 and 28
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Levels
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC[0-24]), AUC From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK2336805, at Day 1
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HCV RNA Levels at Day 2 and Day 28
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration of GSK2336805 (Cmax) and Concentration at 24 h (C24) at Day 1
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Pre-dose Concentration and Concentration at 2 to 4 h Post-dose of GSK2336805 at Days 7, 14, 21, and 28
NCT01439373 (21) [back to overview]Mean Serum HCV RNA Levels at Baseline (Day 1), Day 2 and Day 28
NCT01442779 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Change in Cough
NCT01442779 (3) [back to overview]Minimal/no Progression (1 yr) by High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) & Pulmonary Function
NCT01442779 (3) [back to overview]Minimal/no Change in Quality of Life
NCT01448044 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) or Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) by rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in the IL28B Gene
NCT01448044 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels
NCT01448044 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)
NCT01448044 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) and Who Died
NCT01448044 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With 12 Week Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 4 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR4)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Viral Relapse
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response at Week 72 (SVR72)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With On-Treatment Virologic Failure
NCT01459913 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Level of Activated STAT1(Phospho-STAT1)
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression at Dose Level 4MU
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Dose-reduction on Expression of Interferon Alfa Stimulated Genes
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression Through Marker CD69
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events
NCT01460875 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Correlation Between STAT1 Phosphorylation and Interferon Alfa Gene Regulation
NCT01462773 (2) [back to overview]Document Any Objective Anti-tumor Responses and Time to Tumor Progression That May Occur in Response to This Treatment Regimen.
NCT01462773 (2) [back to overview]Determine Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of VELCADE When Administered in Combination With IFN-α-2b to Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma.
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR 24)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Telaprevir Resistant HCV Variant at Non-Structural Viral Protein 3-4A (NS3-4A) Region
NCT01467479 (8) [back to overview]Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin), and Average Plasma Concentration (Cavg)
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With On Treatment Virologic Failure
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough
NCT01467492 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Telaprevir Resistant HCV Variant at Non-Structural Viral Protein 3-4A (NS3-4A) Region
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With On-Treatment Virologic Failure
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)
NCT01467505 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Total Number of Ocular Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Total Number of Severe Non-ocular Adverse Events Related to the Investigational Product
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Total Number of Severe Ocular Adverse Events Related to the Investigational Product
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week 48 Compared to Baseline
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 48 Compared to Baseline
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study
NCT01468337 (9) [back to overview]Total Number of Non-ocular Adverse Events Related to the Investigational Product
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) by rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in the IL28B Gene
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels Lower Than The Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ), Target Detected (TD) or Target Not Detected (TND)
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died and With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Events (AEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12)
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Received Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), Maintained HIV RNA <40 Copies/mL, and Experienced Confirmed HIV RNA ≥400 Copies/mL
NCT01471574 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels Lower Than the Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ), Target Not Detected (TND)
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count in Percentage
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) Less Than (<) 25 International Units (IU/mL) Undetectable or Detectable/Undetectable
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 24 (SVR 24)
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Participants With Virologic Failure
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normalized Alanine Aminotransferase Levels
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 12 (SVR 12)
NCT01479868 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]CD4+ T-Cell Count (CD4) Change From Baseline
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4, 8 and 12 Study Visits
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After Treatment Discontinuation (SVR12)
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Viral Load <50 Copies/mL
NCT01482767 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After Treatment Discontinuation (SVR24)
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Virologic Failure
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Median Change in log10 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Specific Category of Treatment Outcome
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than 25 IU/mL, (Target Not Detected) at Weeks 8, 12, 24, 32, 40 and 48
NCT01498068 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Relapse-Free Subjects at Month 12 and Month 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Cumulative Number of New T1 (Hypointense) Lesions
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Laboratory Parameters
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With One Concomitant Medication From Baseline up to Month 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Treated With Glucocorticoids Due to Relapses During 24 Months
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Active (New/Enlarging) T2 Lesions at Month 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Time on Treatment (Adherence to Treatment)
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio for Time to First Documented Relapse
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Serious AE (SAE), TEAE Leading to Death and Discontinuation
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Free From Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression at Month 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions at Month 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Annualized Relapse Rate at Month 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Total Number of Reported Relapses at Month 3, 6, 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Mean Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions at Month 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Mean Number of New T1 (Hypointense) Lesions at Month 12 and 24
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Premature Termination From Treatment
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio for Time to First Sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Active (New or Enlarging) T2 Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 12
NCT01514370 (19) [back to overview]Flu-like Symptoms (FLS) Assessed by FLS Scale Score
NCT01524679 (2) [back to overview]Change in Quantitative HBs Antigen at Week 12
NCT01524679 (2) [back to overview]Change in Quantitative HBs Antigen at Week 24
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Caffeine
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of 1-OH-Midazolam (1-hydroxy-midazolam)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]C6hr of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]C6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]C6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]C6hr of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]C24hr of Faldaprevir (BI 201335)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity of Tolbutamide
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity of Midazolam
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity of Caffeine
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity of 1-OH-Midazolam (1-hydroxy-midazolam)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Faldaprevir (BI 201335) From 0 to 24 Hours
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (SVR12)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Faldaprevir (BI 201335)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Tolbutamide
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Midazolam
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)
NCT01525628 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)
NCT01534182 (5) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Depression
NCT01534182 (5) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Treatment Satisfaction
NCT01534182 (5) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Health-related Quality-of-life Using the Short Form Health Survey v2 Acute (SF-36 v2 Acute)
NCT01534182 (5) [back to overview]Changes in Patient-reported Effectiveness, Side Effects and Convenience
NCT01534182 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
NCT01544920 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 Achieving SVR24
NCT01544920 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) 24 Weeks After Completing Study Treatment (SVR24)
NCT01545141 (1) [back to overview]Treatment Related Adverse Events
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Treatment Failure - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Treatment Failure - Time to Event
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving CR or CRu
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed CR (CRu), or Partial Response (PR)
NCT01609010 (10) [back to overview]Disease Progression - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT01609933 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR12)
NCT01609933 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response 24 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR24)
NCT01609933 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01609933 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01641120 (4) [back to overview]Change in Patient Visual Analog Scale Score for Pre-injection Anxiety
NCT01641120 (4) [back to overview]Fear of Injection
NCT01641120 (4) [back to overview]Perception of Needle
NCT01641120 (4) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale Score for Post-injection Pain
NCT01641926 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of HBeAg(-) Participants Achieving Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT01641926 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(-) Participants Achieving Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT01641926 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving HBeAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT01641926 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT01641926 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving the Combined Response of HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Duration, Uncorrected QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected Bazett's Formula (QTcB), QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean GSK2336805 Plasma Concentrations on Day 1, Day 2, Week 4, and Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Very Rapid Virologic Response (vRVR), Rapid Virologic Response (RVR), Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR), Sustained Virologic Response 12 and 24 (SVR12 and SVR24) With Response Guided Treatment (RGT)
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any AEs and Any SAEs After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Urinalysis Data up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Chloride, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Inorganic Phosphorus and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Chloride, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Inorganic Phosphorus and Urea/BUN at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiographic (ECG) Heart Rate Values at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Week 4
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Week 4
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) at Week 4
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving eRVR
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of GSK2336805 at Week 4
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of GSK2336805 at Week 4
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Albumin at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Albumin at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01648140 (35) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Duration of Treatment After Achieving RVR on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Duration of Treatment After Achieving cEVR on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Cumulative Doses of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Body Weight on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Baseline Viral Load Count on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Baseline Level of Fibrosis (kPa) on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Baseline Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Level on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]Odds Ratio (OR) for Impact of Age on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Cumulative Doses of Ribavirin on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]PPV of Complete Early Viral Response (cEVR) on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Rapid Viral Response (RVR) on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response (SVR)
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Overall Duration of Treatment on SVR
NCT01659567 (14) [back to overview]OR for Impact of Gender on SVR
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Change From Baseline in Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Titer at Week 24, 72 and 96
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Decrease >/=1 log10 IU/ml From Baseline to Week 48
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Titer at End of the Combination Treatment (Week 48)
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Number of Participants With Serum HBsAg Loss at Week 12 That Persisted up to Week 96
NCT01706575 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Decrease >/= 50% From Baseline at End of the Combination Treatment (Week 48)
NCT01708941 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01708941 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01708941 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01708941 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA During Treatment by Time Point
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR4
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Developing Post-baseline Antiviral Resistance to Grazoprevir Among Participants Not Achieving SVR24 Response
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Treatment Due to AEs During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR12)
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HCV RNA <25 IU/mL During Treatment by Time Point
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
NCT01710501 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving SVR24
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Dose Reductions, And Death
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Flu-Like Symptoms and Musculoskeletal Symptoms On-Treatment
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) at Follow-Up Week 12
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With End of the Treatment Response (EOTR)
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Grade 3 to 4 Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Cytopenic Abnormalities On-Treatment
NCT01741545 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-Up Week 24 (SVR24)
NCT01766024 (3) [back to overview]Cmax of Interferon Beta-1a
NCT01766024 (3) [back to overview]AUC(0-168) and AUC(0-∞) of Neopterin and MxA Protein
NCT01766024 (3) [back to overview]Area Under Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a From the Moment of Drug Administration Until 48 Hours and to Infinity(AUC(0-48) and AUC(0-∞) Respectively)
NCT01770483 (2) [back to overview]Normalization of Alanine Transferase Test
NCT01770483 (2) [back to overview]Sustained Viral Response,
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse After Treatment
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)
NCT01854528 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in SF-36V2 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Status Survey (SF-36V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Post-treatment Relapse
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment (SVR12) - Primary Efficacy Analyses
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment (SVR24)
NCT01854697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With SVR12 - Secondary Efficacy Analyses
NCT01864148 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT01864148 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: BIIB033 Plasma Concentrations up to Week 84
NCT01864148 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Confirmed as Worsening Responders for Primary Multicomponent Endpoint
NCT01864148 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Confirmed as Improvement Responders for Primary Multicomponent Endpoint
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Grade 3/4 Lab Abnormalities
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) and Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-treatment IFN-associated Flu-like or Musculoskeletal Symptoms
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died or Experienced Severe Adverse Events (SAEs), Dose Reductions of Lambda or Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Cytopenic Abnormalities
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12)
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Absolute CD4 T Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Absolute CD4 T Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01866930 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT01892722 (1) [back to overview]Frequency of Relapses in Patients Treated for up to 24 Months
NCT01925183 (2) [back to overview]Proportions of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01925183 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)
NCT01935089 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Copies of HIV DNA Per CD4+ T Cell at Week 24
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Average Duration of FLS in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any FLS in the 4-Week Run-In Period, During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment, and During 48 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Average Duration of FLS in the 48 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Effectiveness Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of FLS-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Effectiveness of FLS Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of FLS-VAS During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Satisfaction With FLS Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Global Satisfaction Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional FLS Management Regimen to Relieve BIIB017-related FLS
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Side Effects Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Shift in Percentage of Participants With Any FLS From 4-Week Run-In Period to the First 8 Weeks
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Days Missed in 2 Weeks From MS Symptoms: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Days Missed in 2 Weeks From MS Treatment: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Usual Work Days Per Week: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Convenience Scale Factor: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of FLS-VAS During the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Effectiveness of FLS Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Effectiveness Scale Factor: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Visit (Day 1) to Week 48 in Walking Disability Status as Measured by Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS): Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) Testing
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Antibody Screening
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Anti-Pegylated (PEG) Antibody Testing
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing New or Increased FLS During the First 8 Weeks: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Average Duration of FLS Within the Last 4 Weeks of the BIIB017 Treatment Period Compared With the Duration of FLS in the 4-Week Run-In Period
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Shift in Percentage of Participants With Any FLS From 4-Week Run-In Period to 48 Weeks
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing New or Increased FLS During the First 8 Weeks: Between FLS Management Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Convenience Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Severity of FLS (Per FLS-S) in the First 8 Weeks Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period Between Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of Severity of FLS (Per FLS-S) in the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period Between Arms
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Summary of FLS-VAS During the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Satisfaction With FLS Treatment
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Global Satisfaction Scale Factor: Overall Population
NCT01939002 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Side-Effects Scale Factor: Overall Population
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Who Achieve Sustained Viral Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) [16-Week Arm vs. 28-Week Arm]
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious AEs (SAEs)
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Neutropenia
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anemia
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR12 Among Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Across Treatment
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Across Treatment
NCT01945294 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Dose Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01957709 (3) [back to overview]Change in Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Expression After Treatment With IFN Gamma
NCT01957709 (3) [back to overview]MHC Class II Expression
NCT01957709 (3) [back to overview]Changes in Immune Response
NCT01965327 (2) [back to overview]Change in Whole Blood Frataxin Levels
NCT01965327 (2) [back to overview]Change in Total Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Score
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume to Month 24 Based on Rank ANCOVA
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume to Month 24
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 24 Months
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing Brain Lesions at Month 24
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary Scores
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 Months
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 Months
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were New or Enlarging T2 Lesion-Free at Month 24
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Lesion-Free at Month 24
NCT02047734 (12) [back to overview]Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at the End of Month 24
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Hematology
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Blood Chemistry
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum Tetanus Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Vaccination-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum Pneumococcal Antibodies (Serotype 3) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 8 (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 8 (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Tetanus Responders (≥ 2-Fold Rise) at Day 28 Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Tetanus Responders (≥ 4-Fold Rise) at Day 28 Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Meningococcal Serogroup C Responders (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Meningococcal Serogroup C Responders (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum Meningococcal Antibodies (Serogroup C) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination
NCT02097849 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum Pneumococcal Antibodies (Serotype 8) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Therapy
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage Cumulative Dose of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Received
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage Cumulative Dose of Ribavirin Received
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR)
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment (EOT) Response
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADR)
NCT02106156 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With the Most Frequent Concomitant Medications
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Virological Response
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Virological Relapse
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Futility
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02118597 (7) [back to overview]Sustained Virological Response 24 (SVR24) Rate
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Adverse Events Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]CXCL10 (Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10) Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]CXCL11 (C-X-C Motif Chemokine 11) Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Cytokine Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Cytokine Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Stromal Derived Factor 1 Alpha (SDF-1A/CXCL-12) Chemokine Levels
NCT02151448 (11) [back to overview]Tumor Necrosis Factor (TFNα) Cytokine Levels
NCT02155322 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02155322 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Because of AEs
NCT02159482 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Clinical Responders (Complete Response + Partial Response)
NCT02159482 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing an Increase in the Magnitude of the Tumor Antigen-specific Immune Response
NCT02168361 (2) [back to overview]Serum HCV RNA Level
NCT02168361 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 (SVR-12)
NCT02218164 (4) [back to overview]Occurence of Treatment Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02218164 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02218164 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02218164 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ribavirin Compliance at ≥ 95%, 80% - 95%, and < 80%
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least a Serious Adverse Events Associated With Study Treatment (Peg-interferon and Ribavirin)
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response 6 Months After Treatment Discontinuation
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events by Severity Grade
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Grouped by HIV-1 RNA Concentrations
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Able to Perform Self-injections of Peg-interferon
NCT02247440 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Completed the First 24 and 48 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Who Missed Any Partial Days From Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Medication Adherence Based on Morisky Medication Adherence Score
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Full Days Missed From Work by Subjects
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Days Per Week Assistant Worked For Subject Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Reasons of Missed Injections
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Times Subjects Visited Emergency Room Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Visits to Clinic by Subjects Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Adherence
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Relapse by Adherence Category
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Relapse by Adherence Category
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Prematurely Terminated Treatment and Reasons
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Visits by Healthcare Professional to Subjects' Home
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Overall Evaluation of RebiSmart Use as Assessed by Investigator
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Working Days Missed by Relative or Friend Due to Subjects' Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Whose Relatives or Friends Missed Work Due to Subjects' Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire -Number of Subjects Who Paid Someone to Assist Them Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Mean Number of Relapses in RMS Subjects
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Days Subjects Hospitalized Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Accomplished Less Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Hours Per Day Missed From Work by Subjects
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Who Missed Any Full Days From Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Hours Per Day Assistant Worked for Subject Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Relapse-free RMS Subjects
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Time to the First Relapse for CIS Subjects
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Visiting Different Types of Doctors During Their Clinical Visit
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects With Percentage of Work Completed Despite of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT02254304 (29) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Event or Adverse Drug Reaction (AE/ADR), Serious AE/ADR, AE/ADR Leading to Death and AE/ADR Leading to Early Termination
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Loss of HBsAg
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) at 24 Weeks Post-End of Treatment/End of Untreated Observation
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Antigen (HBeAg)
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Different Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels (Less Than [<] 20,000 International Units Per Milliliter [IU/mL], < 2000 IU/mL, or Undetectable HBV DNA)
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Different Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels (Less Than [<] 20,000 International Units Per Milliliter [IU/mL], < 2000 IU/mL, or Undetectable HBV DNA)
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HBV DNA Levels in the Untreated Control Participants
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Envelope Antibody (Anti-HBe), Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Envelope Antibody (Anti-HBe), Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Antigen (HBeAg)
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs), Defined as Loss of HBsAg and Presence of Anti-HBs
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs), Defined as Loss of HBsAg and Presence of Anti-HBs
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Peg-INF-Alfa-2A
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HBV DNA Levels in the Peg-INF-Alfa-2A (Treated) Arm
NCT02263079 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modification or Interruption
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 Months
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment Period
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume at Month 12
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary Scores
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 Months
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 Months
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were T2 Lesion-Free at Month 12
NCT02294058 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing Lesion-Free at Month 12
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 3
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 5
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 52
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 8
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Number and Severity of IP-related AEs
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 8
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 52
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 5
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 3
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 1
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Withdrew
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Central Visual Field Sensitivity at Day 2 and Week 5 Compared to Baseline.
NCT02338973 (32) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 1
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL)
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response at 4, 8, and 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR4, SVR8, and SVR24)
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure During Treatment and Viral Relapse After the End of Treatment.
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline Who Achieved Normal Limit of ALT at Final Treatment Visit.
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response at 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment.
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Mean Absolute Values in HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL)
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Achieving HCV RNA < LLOQ, TND
NCT02340962 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Achieving HCV RNA < Lower Limit of Quantification, Target Detected or Target Not Detected (< LLOQ, TD or TND)
NCT02343224 (3) [back to overview]Number of Children Responding to Treatment
NCT02343224 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Event Free Survival Criteria
NCT02343224 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Overall Survival Criteria
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Incidence
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]AUC (0-168); AUC (0-336); AUC (0-672); AUC (0-∞ ) of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Incidence BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC/IM
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]AUC(0-last); AUC (0-∞ ) BCD-054 of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a - 180 mcg - SC, BCD-054 - 180 mcg - IM
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]AUC(0-∞), AUC(0-last) of Neopterin
NCT02359877 (6) [back to overview]AUC (0-168); AUC (0-336); AUC (0-672);AUC (0-∞ ) of Neopterin
NCT02415127 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale Score (FARStot)
NCT02415127 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)-mNeuro Score
NCT02415127 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score
NCT02415127 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)
NCT02430181 (1) [back to overview]Improvement in Quantitative Serum HDV RNA Levels After 4-12 Weeks of Lonafarnib-based Therapy
NCT02430194 (4) [back to overview]ALT Normalization at End of Treatment
NCT02430194 (4) [back to overview]< LLOQ in HDV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02430194 (4) [back to overview]≥2 log10 Decline of HDV RNA From Baseline at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02430194 (4) [back to overview]Mean HDV RNA Decline
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in the Evening PEF From Baseline to up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Severe Asthma Exacerbations Within 7 and 30 Days Following Randomisation
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Moderate Asthma Exacerbation Within 7, 14 and 30 Days Following Randomisation
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in the Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) From Baseline to up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Change in Asthma Control From Baseline up to 30 Days as Measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6)
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Change in Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]) From Baseline up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Change in the Proportion of Night-time Awakening Using the ePRO Questionnaire From Baseline up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in Daytime and Night-time Reliever Medication Use From Baseline up to 14 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in the Evening FEV1 From Baseline up to 30 Days
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With a Severe Asthma Exacerbation During 14 Days of Treatment
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Time to First Moderate Asthma Exacerbation During 30 Days Following Randomisation
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation During 30 Days Following Randomisation
NCT02491684 (15) [back to overview]AUC for Change in Daytime and Night-time Asthma Symptom Score From Baseline up to 30 Days
NCT02541409 (4) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Resistance
NCT02541409 (4) [back to overview]HCV Treatment Completion
NCT02541409 (4) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events
NCT02541409 (4) [back to overview]Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT02577029 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs Considered Possibly or Probably Related to Treatment
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Count of Participants Who Displayed Persistence of Transferred T Cells in Blood and Tumor (Group Co2)
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Displayed Evidence of Epitope Spreading
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Count of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events, Evaluated According to the Current Guidelines in National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria Version 4.0
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Evidence of Response, Based on Median Time to New Metastasis
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Functional Capacity of Transferred T Cells (Group 2)
NCT02584829 (6) [back to overview]Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC)-Specific Survival
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Abnormal Laboratory Values
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Adherence to Study Treatment at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score at Week 12 and 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fatigue Status Scale (FSS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AE Stratified by Severity
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change in Relapse-Free Participants at Week 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Score of All Domains of TSQM-9 at Week 24
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT02587065 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adapted Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire (MSTCQ) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02593773 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive/Negative Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) and Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Tests
NCT02593773 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Number of ICU-free Days
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Vasoactive Support
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Renal Support
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Organ Failure
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Neurological Functioning (6MWT) at Extended Long-term Follow-up
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Long-term Efficacy Endpoints Relating to Respiratory Functioning (FEV1)
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Long-term Efficacy Endpoints Relating to Neurological Functioning (6MWT)
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Long-term Efficacy Endpoint: Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Day 180
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Extended Long-term Follow-up Exploratory Endpoint: Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Day 360
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Extended Long-term Follow-up Endpoint: Respiratory Functioning (FEV1) at Day 360
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Exploratory, Extended Long-term Follow-up: Overall Mortality at Day 360
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy Endpoint: Mortality in Hospital
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Number of Days in Hospital
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy Endpoint: Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic (PD) Using Myxovirus Resistance Protein A (MxA) Biomarker
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy Endpoint: All-cause Mortality
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Composite Endpoint (VFDsurv; All-cause Mortality and Number of Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation) at Day 28
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Change in the Treatment-specific Exploratory Biomarker Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73) Concentration
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Physical Examination
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Laboratory Results
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy Endpoint: Mortality in ICU
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Post-Hoc Analyses Related to the Use of Concomitant Glucocorticoids Medications and Mortality at D28
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacogenetic Analysis
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Exploratory Variables Relating to Efficacy: Composite Endpoint (Mortality and Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation) at Day 90
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Heart Rate
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Body Temperature
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Blood Pressure
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety: Adverse Events and Deaths
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy Endpoint: Presence of Neutralising Antibodies to IFN Beta-1a
NCT02622724 (30) [back to overview]Changes in Levels of Potential Inflammatory Markers (PIMs)
NCT02627144 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Tumor Response
NCT02627144 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time
NCT02627144 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
NCT02627144 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT02666768 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain
NCT02666768 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT02666768 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events CTCAE v4.0 Grade 3 or Higher
NCT02666768 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of GPT
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of PEG-IFN
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Glutamate-Pyruvate Transaminase (GPT)
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of PEG-IFN
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ribavirin
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Log Likelihood Median Values of Hepatitis C-Virus (HCV) Kinetic Models for Quantitative HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Measurement With Various Assumptions of Ribavirin Mechanism of Action
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of PEG-IFN
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Ribavirin
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Ribavirin
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Score in Quality of Life Assessed Using Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Questionnaire
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Response
NCT02716779 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of GPT
NCT02726789 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Reductions in Serum HBV DNA
NCT02726789 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Reductions in Serum HBsAg
NCT02726789 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Treatment Emergent Laboratory Test Abnormalities or Adverse Events.
NCT02726789 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Serum Anti-HBs > 10 mIU / ml
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Relapse Free Time
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Annual Relapse Rate
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events Frequency
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Withdrawal
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Relapse Free Time
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Without Confirmed Relapse
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Immunogenicity
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events Frequency
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Adverse Reaction/Serious Adverse Reactions
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Immunogenicity
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Annual Relapse Rate
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions
NCT02727907 (17) [back to overview]Withdrawal
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seronegative at Weeks 48 and 72
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 48
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 72
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Negative Hepatitis D Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HDV RNA) at Week 72
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Negative HDV RNA at Week 48
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (HBsAb) at Weeks 48 and 72
NCT02732639 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Below 1*10^5 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Weeks 48 and 72
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Without SVR Among Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at the End of Treatment
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Serum Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) RNA Levels
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA 12 Weeks After the Last Dose of Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Level Categories
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 4 (CD4) Cell Counts at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
NCT02761629 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4/CD8 Ratio at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
NCT02797080 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT02829775 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02829775 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Tumor Response
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Overall Response Duration Beyond 12 Months (ORR12)
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT03063632 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in Two or More Patients [Safety]
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Non-progression of Tumors
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Durability of Tumor Response
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events [Safety]
NCT03066947 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event Related to SV-BR-1-GM Administration [Safety]
NCT03112590 (4) [back to overview]Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
NCT03112590 (4) [back to overview]Phase 2: Clinical Response
NCT03112590 (4) [back to overview]Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)/Number of Participants Who Progressed
NCT03112590 (4) [back to overview]Phase 2: Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR)
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]Tentative Disease Specific Marker Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73, Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase Enzyme) Concentration in Serum Samples
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Days Receiving Hemodialysis
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Prevalence of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome by Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP)
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Prevalence of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome by Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP)
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]Pharmacoeconomic Information of Length of ICU Stay, Length of Hospital Stay, Length of Stay at Another Health Care Facility, Length of Hemodialysis Needed, Ventilation Free Days
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]Safety Parameters of Clinically Significant Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events, Vital Signs and Clinical Laboratory Parameters
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning All Cause Mortality
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]Myxovirus Resistant Protein A (MxA) Concentration in Whole Blood Samples as Pharmacodynamic Marker
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Organ Failure Free Days by Means of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning All Cause Mortality
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Ventilator Free Days (VFDs)
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Disability by Modified Ranking Scale (mRS).
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Neutralizing Antibodies Against IFN Beta-1a (NAbs) in Whole Blood Samples
NCT03119701 (14) [back to overview]Tentative Disease Specific, Potential Inflammatory Marker - Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in Serum Samples
NCT03368664 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Months 4 and 8
NCT03368664 (3) [back to overview]Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan
NCT03368664 (3) [back to overview]Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan
NCT03403634 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT03403634 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03403634 (4) [back to overview]Change in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in the Colorectal Cancer Lesions
NCT03403634 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1
NCT03480932 (3) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events
NCT03480932 (3) [back to overview]Medication Adherence
NCT03480932 (3) [back to overview]SVR12
NCT03537274 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Responder Status at 24 Weeks of Follow-up
NCT03537274 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Responder Status at 24 Weeks of Treatment
NCT03547154 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (CR) to PEG Intron and Intron A at 6 Months
NCT03547154 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival
NCT03547154 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Responses to PEG Intron and Intron A at 6 Months
NCT03552549 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03554005 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an Adverse Event
NCT03554005 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
NCT03554005 (3) [back to overview]Best Objective Response
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction in Fibroscan Transient Elastography Values
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Normalization of Serum ALT
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Change in Quantitative Log HBsAg Levels From Baseline 24 Weeks After Completing Therapy
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Change in Quantitative Log HBsAg Levels From Baseline to Week 24
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinue Medication
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction in Histologic Inflammatory Scores (Modified HAI)
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decline of Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) RNA Viral Titer of >2 Logs
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at 24 Weeks After Completing Therapy
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at Week 12 Weeks After Completing Therapy
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at Week 24
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG)
NCT03600714 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response
NCT04081389 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)
NCT04081389 (4) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)
NCT04081389 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04081389 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT04343976 (3) [back to overview]Undetectable COVID PCR Testing at Day 14
NCT04343976 (3) [back to overview]Undetectable COVID PCR at Day 7
NCT04343976 (3) [back to overview]Undetectable COVID PCR at Day 3
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Basophils
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Recovery for Patients With a Baseline Ordinal Score of 4 and 5
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of Hospitalization
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to an Improvement of One Category Using an Ordinal Scale
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Grade 3 and 4 Clinical and/or Laboratory Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]28-day Participant Mortality
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]14-day Participant Mortality
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 5
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 1
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Platelets
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Monocytes
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lymphoctyes
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Creatinine
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to an Improvement of Two Categories Using an Ordinal Scale
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Discharge or to a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Sex
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Race
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Ethnicity
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 8
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in D-dimer Concentration
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 3
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 29
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 22
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 15
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 11
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15 for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Discontinuation or Temporary Suspension of Study Product Administration
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Ordinal Scale
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of Non Invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of New Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use
NCT04492475 (49) [back to overview]Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline HBV DNA
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Treatment
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in HBsAg
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Laboratory Abnormality
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in HBV pgRNA
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of ABI-H0731
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in HBeAg
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in HBcrAg
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of ABI-H0731
NCT04781647 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event

5-year Relapse-free Survival Rate

Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as time from randomization to disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Patients without disease relapse were censored at last disease assessment date known of free of relapse. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year RFS rate in the intent-to-treat (ITT) patients. (NCT00003641)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Observation0.70
Interferon Alfa-2b0.70

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients still alive were censored at last known alive date. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year OS rate in the ITT patients. (NCT00003641)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Observation0.83
Interferon Alfa-2b0.83

[back to top]

Best Response as Measured by CT, Bone Scans, and Clinical Progression

(NCT00003656)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponseMinor ReponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseDisease Progression
Phase 1 Group10155
Phase 2 Group01346

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Toxicity by Clinical Evaluation From First Dose to 30 Days After Last Dose

(NCT00003656)
Timeframe: In 30 days after the last dose, an average of 1 year.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fatigue : Grade 1Fatigue : Grade 2Fatigue : Grade 3Fatigue : Grade 4Skin : Grade 1Skin : Grade 2Skin : Grade 3Skin : Grade 4Xeroderma : Grade 1Xeroderma : Grade 2Xeroderma : Grade 3Xeroderma : Grade 4Constipation : Grade 1Constipation : Grade 2Constipation : Grade 3Constipation : Grade 4Cough : Grade 1Cough : Grade 2Cough : Grade 3Cough : Grade 4Anemia : Grade 1Anemia : Grade 2Anemia : Grade 3Anemia : Grade 4Anorexia : Grade 1Anorexia : Grade 2Anorexia : Grade 3Anorexia : Grade 4Neurologic : Grade 1Neurologic : Grade 2Neurologic : Grade 3Neurologic : Grade 4Diarrhea : Grade 1Diarrhea : Grade 2Diarrhea : Grade 3Diarrhea : Grade 4Nausea/vomiting : Grade 1Nausea/vomiting : Grade 2Nausea/vomiting : Grade 3Nausea/vomiting : Grade 4Altered mood : Grade 1Altered mood : Grade 2Altered mood : Grade 3Altered mood : Grade 4Leukopenia : Grade 1Leukopenia : Grade 2Leukopenia : Grade 3Leukopenia : Grade 4Fever : Grade 1Fever : Grade 2Fever : Grade 3Fever : Grade 4Renal : Grade 1Renal : Grade 2Renal : Grade 3Renal : Grade 4Liver : Grade 1Liver : Grade 2Liver : Grade 3Liver : Grade 4Thrombocytopenia : Grade 1Thrombocytopenia : Grade 2Thrombocytopenia : Grade 3Thrombocytopenia : Grade 4Infusion reaction : Grade 1Infusion reaction : Grade 2Infusion reaction : Grade 3Infusion reaction : Grade 4Pulmonary : Grade 1Pulmonary : Grade 2Pulmonary : Grade 3Pulmonary : Grade 4Nasal congestion : Grade 1Nasal congestion : Grade 2Nasal congestion : Grade 3Nasal congestion : Grade 4Hypotension : Grade 1Hypotension : Grade 2Hypotension : Grade 3Hypotension : Grade 4Cholesterol/TG : Grade 1Cholesterol/TG : Grade 2Cholesterol/TG : Grade 3Cholesterol/TG : Grade 4Bone pain : Grade 1Bone pain : Grade 2Bone pain : Grade 3Bone pain : Grade 4Other pain : Grade 1Other pain : Grade 2Other pain : Grade 3Other pain : Grade 4
Phase 1 Group750010001100050004200312092008310500022008000223041001100100020000000000000000000000000000000
Phase 2 Group84003000500040000000250062009100400061004000210050003000200030000100101010000100100010005000

[back to top]

Duration of Response (Progression-free Survival) as Measured by CT, Bone Scans, and Clinical Progression From Initiation of Therapy Until an Increase of ≥ 25% From the Smallest Sum of All Tumor Measurements Obtained During the Best Response

(NCT00003656)
Timeframe: At 6 months and 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
6 month12 month
Phase 1 Group54
Phase 2 Group73

[back to top]

Change in Retinoic Acid Receptor Expression on Tissue as Measured by Number of Subjects With the Presence of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes During the First and Fifth Dose

(NCT00003656)
Timeframe: At baseline and 5th week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Subjects0

[back to top]

Three-year Overall Survival

Kaplan-Meier estimate at three years post-first transplant of survival. Outcome is death or alive at follow-up (censored). 95 percent confidence interval of the point estimate is calculated using Greenwood's variance. (NCT00004088)
Timeframe: Estimate reported at three years after day 0 of the first cycle of infusion of cells of the tandem transplant.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
HD Chemo Followed by PBPC Rescue0.662

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Kaplan-Meier estimate at three years post-first transplant of survival. Event of interest is the first of Death or Progression. Censoring is Alive in Continuous Complete Remission at date of last follow-up.~95 percent confidence interval of the point estimate is calculated using Greenwood's variance." (NCT00004088)
Timeframe: Estimate reported at three years after day 0 of the first cycle of infusion of cells of the tandem transplant.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
HD Chemo Followed by PBPC Rescue0.456

[back to top]

Toxicity

Number of patients with Grade 3-5 adverse events that are related to study drug by given type of adverse event (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: While on treatment, patients on the HDIFN arm were assessed weekly for the 1st month, then every 2 weeks for the 2nd month, then every 3 months therafter; patients on the biochemo arm were assessed daily for the 1st 5 days, then weekly thereafter.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal pain/crampingAcidosisAcute vascular leak syndromeAlkaline phosphatase increaseAllergic reactionAnal incontinenceAnemiaAnorexiaAnxiety/agitationApneaArrhythmia, NOSArthralgiaBilirubin increaseBone painCPK increaseCardiovascular-otherCatheter related infectionCerebrovascular ischemiaColitisConfusionConstipation/bowel obstructionCranial neuropathyCreatinine increaseDehydrationDelusionsDepressionDiarrhea without colostomyDizziness/light headednessDizziness/vertigo, NOSDouble visionDyspneaEryth/rash/eruption/desq, NOSEsophagitis/dysphagiaEye-otherFatigue/malaise/lethargyFebrile neutropeniaFever without neutropeniaFever, NOSHallucinationsHeadacheHemorrhage w/ 3-4 thrombocytHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypocalcemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypotensionHypoxiaInfection w/o 3-4 neutropeniaInfection with 3-4 neutropeniaInfection, unk ANCInsomniaLeukopeniaLipase increaseLocal injection site reactionLymphopeniaMood/consciousness change, NOSMuscle weakness (not neuro)MyalgiaNauseaNeutropenia/granulocytopeniaPRBC transfusionPancreatitisPersonality/behavioral changePetechiae/purpuraPlatelet transfusionPruritusRash/desquamationRenal failureReportable adverse event, NOSRespiratory infect w/ neutropRigors/chillsSGOT (AST) increaseSGPT (ALT) increaseSeizuresSensory neuropathyStomatitis/pharyngitisSurgery-wound infectionSyncopeThrombocytopeniaThrombosis/embolismTyphlitisVertigoVomitingWeakness (motor neuropathy)Weight loss
Biochemotherapy1113018950031410202340471461112320229511513111018756416139213820211451613101531011217822100501103720
Interferon10001001412400010102010101422001101381101902010101000000011121100071025001001401021832000321101913

[back to top]

5-year Relapse-Free Survival

Measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease or death due to any cause. (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: Every three months for the first year, every 6 months for years 2-5, annually for years 6-10

InterventionPercentage of population (Number)
Interferon47
Biochemotherapy38

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured from the date of registration to study until death from any cause with observations censored at the date of last contact for patients last known to be alive. (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: Every three months for a year, every six months for years 2-5, annual for years 5-10

InterventionPercent of population (Number)
Interferon56
Biochemotherapy56

[back to top] [back to top]

Initial Response to Therapy

Evaluate initial response to therapy (complete remission, partial remission, stable response, or progression of disease) (NCT00006244)
Timeframe: Evaluated at Day +84-90 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients in Complete RemissionPatients in Partial RemissionPatients with Stable resposnePatients with Disease Progression
Immunotherapy Treatment158103

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival in Multiple Myeloma patients treated with melphalan, IL2-incubated peripheral blood stem cells, and sequential IL2 and interferon maintenance. (NCT00006244)
Timeframe: 12.9 Median Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immunotherapy Treatment9

[back to top] [back to top]

Proportion of Patients Alive and in Remission

(NCT00006244)
Timeframe: 12.9 Median Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immunotherapy Treatment4

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

(NCT00006244)
Timeframe: 12.9 years (median)

Interventionyears (Median)
Immunotherapy Treatment1.61

[back to top]

Major Cytogenetic Response After 6 and 12 Months of Treatment.

"Cytogenetic response in terms of the percentage of Ph chromosome positive metaphases in bone marrow is defined as follows:~Complete* (0% Ph-positive cells) Partial* (1-34%) Minor (35-95%) None (96-100%).~*Major cytogenetic response includes complete and partial cytogenetic response." (NCT00015847)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months after treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate18

[back to top] [back to top]

Complete Cytogenetic Response at 6 and 12 Months (Phase II)

"Cytogenetic response in terms of the percentage of Ph chromosome positive metaphases in bone marrow is defined as follows:~Complete* (0% Ph-positive cells) Partial* (1-34%) Minor (35-95%) None (96-100%)." (NCT00015847)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 months during phase II

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate13

[back to top]

Comparison of Plasma Levels of VEGF Following Administration of Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination With IFN-alfa

Analyzed by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).VEGF only analyzed at baseline. (NCT00026221)
Timeframe: At baseline

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Arm I: Bevacizumab + Iinterferon-alpha-2b567
Arm II: Bevacizumab Alone633
Arm III (Monoclonal Antibody and Biological Therapy)18

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Measured from the time measurement criteria are met for complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented. Evaluated using the new international criteria proposed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Committee. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00026221)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpatients (Number)
Arm I: Bevacizumab + Iinterferon-alpha-2b1
Arm II: Bevacizumab Alone0
Arm III (Monoclonal Antibody and Biological Therapy)6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Defined as the time from treatment start date until documentation of progressive disease. Evaluated using the new international criteria proposed by the RECIST Committee. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00026221)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I: Bevacizumab + Iinterferon-alpha-2b3
Arm II: Bevacizumab Alone8.5
Arm III (Monoclonal Antibody and Biological Therapy)4.8

[back to top]

Two Year Survival of Pediatric Patients With Diffuse Pontine Gliomas

Survival is measured from the date the patient is registered onto the protocol until the day of death and the date of diagnosis to the date of patient death. (NCT00036569)
Timeframe: 8 yrs 6 mo 0 days

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Interferon Alfa14.29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00036569)
Timeframe: 8 yrs 11 mo 22 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Alfa32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Metabolic and Biological Change in the Brainstem Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Techniques

MRI of the brain will be performed at the NCI prior to cycles 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and continuing every other month until cycle 27. Following cycle 27 the patient will have an MRI performed every third cycle until cycle 52 at which time they will have an MRI performed annually, and when clinically indicated. Baseline MR images are compared with MR images performed during the various cycles (e.g. cycles 1, 2, 3...) Imaging was exploratory and the degree of change that is considered clinically significant rather than technique related is still being explored. (NCT00036569)
Timeframe: once a week for 4 weeks beginning 2-10 weeks after completion of radiation therapy and continued until disease progression or one of the other off study criteria.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Alfa32

[back to top]

Median Time to Progression

Time between the final day of treatment to the day of disease progression. (NCT00036569)
Timeframe: 8 yrs 11 mo 22 days

InterventionDays (Number)
Interferon Alfa235

[back to top]

Mean Quality of Life (QOL) Score at Baseline and Follow-Up

QOL questionnaires will be performed prior to every cycle for patients age 6-18 years and their parents until cycle 27 and then prior to every third cycle until cycle 52 when the evaluations will become annual. The QOL (NIH Impact of Pediatric Illness Scale) is too detailed to be described and/or shown here. It is a questionnaire made up of approximately 40 questions-the answers are ranked from 1 to 5 with 5 being no impact and 1 being significant impact-For further details see the protocol. (NCT00036569)
Timeframe: once a week for 4 weeks beginning 2-10 weeks after completion of radiation therapy and continued until disease progression or one of the other off study criteria.

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
QOL Score at Baseline3.59
QOL Score at Follow-up3.89

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the total number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00047879)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Glioblastoma Multiforme Stratum4
Anaplastic Glioma Stratum2

[back to top]

Non-progression Rate (Clinical Response to Peginterferon Alfa-2b)

"Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.0 criteria. Per RECIST criteria, complete response (CR) = disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR)= >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. Progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s) or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) = did not meet criteria for response or progression.~Non-progression rate = CR + PR + SD." (NCT00049530)
Timeframe: assessed every 9 weeks until suppression of plasma b-FGF level to normal, every 12 weeks until the completion of 12 months of treatment, >= 4 weeks after documented response. After off treatment, every 3 months if <2 years, and every 6 months if 2-3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-interferon Alfa-2b24.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from registration to disease progression, or censored at last known date of non progressive disease. (NCT00049530)
Timeframe: assessed every 9 weeks until suppression of plasma b-FGF level to normal, every 12 weeks until the completion of 12 months of treatment, >= 4 weeks after documented response. After off treatment, every 3 months if <2 years, and every 6 months if 2-3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
PEG-interferon Alfa-2b2

[back to top]

Plasma b-FGF Level Response

The primary endpoint was the suppression of plasma b-FGF level with low dose peginterferon alfa-2b. A clinically important reduction of plasma b-FGF levels was determined to be a level less than or equal to 7.5 pg/mL. A patient was considered to have a suppressed plasma b-FGF level, if the patient experienced the clinically significant reduction (less than or equal to 7.5 pg/mL) of plasma b-FGF levels for two consecutive determinations which were at least three weeks apart. This was considered as a b-FGF response. (NCT00049530)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 weeks until the suppression of plasma b-FGF level to normal, then every 6 weeks until the completion of 12 months of treatment, and upon treatment discontinuation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-interferon Alfa-2b34.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) time was defined as the time from registration to death from any cause, or censored at last known date of survival. (NCT00049530)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months if <2 years, and every 6 months if 2-3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
PEG-interferon Alfa-2b9.7

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate

Relapse was defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination, attributable to multiple sclerosis that lasted for at least 48 hours, that were present at normal body temperature, and that were preceded by at least 30 days of clinical stability. Annualized relapse rate was estimated using a Poisson regression model with observed number of relapses as a dependent variable, the log total amount of follow-up from date of randomization for each participant as an offset variable and treatment group indicator as a covariate. (NCT00050778)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionrelapses per participant per year (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.37
Alemtuzumab 12 mg0.12
Alemtuzumab 24 mg0.09
Alemtuzumab (Pooled)0.11

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in MRI T2 Lesion Volume at Year 3

Percent change in lesion volume at Year 3 was calculated from MRI-T2-weighted scans as: 100*([lesion volume at Year 3] minus [lesion volume at Baseline]) divided by [lesion volume at Baseline]). (NCT00050778)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a23.4
Alemtuzumab 12 mg-11.4
Alemtuzumab 24 mg-8.9
Alemtuzumab (Pooled)-10.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in T1 Cerebral Volume at Year 3

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 was used to determine rate of cerebral atrophy (decrease in cerebral/brain volume). Partial brain volumes were measured using the technique of Losseff et al. (1996). Percent change in cerebral volume at Year 3 was calculated from MRI-T1-weighted scans as: 100*([brain volume at Year 3] minus [brain volume at Baseline]) divided by [brain volume at Baseline]). (NCT00050778)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-1.9
Alemtuzumab 12 mg-0.8
Alemtuzumab 24 mg-0.4
Alemtuzumab (Pooled)-0.6

[back to top]

Probability of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at 3 Years After Initial Treatment

Participants were considered relapse free at Year 3 if they did not experience a relapse between randomization and study completion at 36 months. Participants who discontinued early were considered relapse free if they did not experience a relapse prior to discontinuation. Probability of participants who were relapse free at Year 3, estimated using the KM method, was reported. (NCT00050778)
Timeframe: Year 3

Interventionprobability of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.50
Alemtuzumab 12 mg0.76
Alemtuzumab 24 mg0.84
Alemtuzumab (Pooled)0.80

[back to top]

Probability of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). As measured by EDSS score, SAD was defined as increase of at least 1.5 points for participants with Baseline score of 0 and increase of at least 1.0 point for participants with Baseline score of 1.0 or more; and the increase persisted for at least next the 2 scheduled assessments, that is, 6 consecutive months. The onset date of SAD was date of first EDSS assessment that began 6 month consecutive period of SAD. Participants who did not reach SAD endpoint were censored at their last visit. Probability of participants with SAD, estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, was reported. (NCT00050778)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionprobability of participants with SAD (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.27
Alemtuzumab 12 mg0.08
Alemtuzumab 24 mg0.09
Alemtuzumab (Pooled)0.09

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Time from registration to documented disease progression (RECIST criteria) or death. (NCT00062010)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
IFN 13CRA Paclitaxel2.0

[back to top]

Survival

Time from registration to death. (NCT00062010)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 1 year then every 6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IFN 13CRA Paclitaxel6.2

[back to top]

Response by RECIST Criteria (v 1.0)

Number of eligible, treated participants in each response category by RECIST criteria (NCT00062010)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseUnevaluable
IFN 13CRA Paclitaxel351115

[back to top]

Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST)

"The Q-Twist is not a score calculated for each participant but is defined only on a by treatment group basis. For each treatment group, it is the weighted sum of the mean durations of the health states Tox, Twist, and Relapse. Tox is defined as time with severe toxicity related to treatment; Twist: time without symptoms or toxic side effects; and Relapse: time after relapse/progression. The mean duration of each health state is calculated based on the area under the Kaplan Meier curve pertaining to that health state. There is no direct method for calculating the dispersion of Q-Twist, and it is typically done using bootstrap method for purposes of inference (see, e.g., Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD. Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1259-76). In practice, as apparently in the case with this study, the intermediate values resulting from the bootstrap exercise were not displayed." (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Number)
Interferon Alfa6.9083
Temsirolimus8.3707
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus7.4821

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death, withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event (AE), withdrawal of voluntary consent, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first, censored at the date of the conclusion of treatment phase. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa1.9
Temsirolimus3.7
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus2.5

[back to top]

European Quality of Life Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) - Index Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. EQ-5D index measured 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Range of EQ-5D index score = -0.594 to 1 where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Interferon Alfa0.656
Temsirolimus0.689
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus0.689

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: Time from first documentation of objective tumor response to first date that recurrence or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD, the smallest sum LD recorded since randomization. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.4
Temsirolimus11.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.3
Temsirolimus10.9
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus8.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit: confirmed CR or PR or had stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30% decrease in sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa16.4
Temsirolimus34.0
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus30.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa5.3
Temsirolimus9.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on Independent Central Review Assessment. The period from randomization until disease progression, death or date of last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, monthly until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa3.2
Temsirolimus5.6
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus4.9

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival defined overall survival time, measured from date of tissue diagnosis till disease progression or death. (NCT00068575)
Timeframe: Participants followed till disease progression or death (approximately 6 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Postoperative Chemoradiation Regimen42

[back to top]

Time to First Relapse

Relapse was defined as new, worsening or recurrent neurological symptoms attributed to multiple sclerosis that last for at least 24 hours without fever or infection, or adverse reaction to prescribed medication, preceded by a stable or improving neurological status of at least 30 days. These new or worsening symptoms should be noted by subject and must be accompanied by at least 1 of the following: An increase of greater than or equal to (>=) 1 grade in >=2 functional scales of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) or an increase of >=2 grades in 1 functional scale of the EDSS or an increase of >= 0.5 or an increase of >=1.0 in EDSS if the previous EDSS was 0. Time to first relapse was defined as the time in days from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first multiple sclerosis relapse. The mean time to first relapse for the 25th percentile and the 30th percentile during the 96-week treatment period was measured by Kaplan-Meier estimates and was reported. (NCT00078338)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
25th Percentile30th Percentile
Copaxone®290.0432.0
Rebif®332.0495.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival at six years after initiating protocol therapy (NCT00083551)
Timeframe: 6 Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Thalidomide65
No Thalidomide58

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
PLASMA bFGF: C2D28:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D1:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D28:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4D1:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=10, 0)
SU0112480.7601.5821.6712.8950.803

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale

Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=370, 349)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 319)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=292, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=284, 194)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 107)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α22.9422.2022.3122.2222.4222.1222.2622.3822.3522.3622.5622.3322.4622.1021.9522.1722.7421.9622.4522.0621.5121.0920.7921.2520.9321.3021.5120.3220.3520.2321.4121.5222.2521.7521.7121.2721.3020.7321.2620.67
SU01124823.1423.6023.5023.4023.5123.4423.7323.3623.5323.6823.3523.4023.2923.1323.6723.2623.2623.2623.0823.0323.0522.7123.2323.0723.1523.3122.8223.2423.2823.0423.1123.4123.4223.5023.5323.7023.8523.5323.6022.93

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale

Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 348)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=329, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 239)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=286, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=159, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 9)
IFN-α22.7018.8520.0519.8420.8720.6321.5621.3121.8421.2321.7020.9621.6721.6621.9421.4022.5822.3822.6021.8322.2321.8822.6021.9021.9921.8022.0522.7522.3322.0720.6321.4221.8120.5021.8322.4522.4521.6021.7822.33
SU01124823.1419.4322.2220.3422.4520.1822.7221.0023.2420.9122.9921.2223.0521.2223.5821.5123.4121.2922.9421.2123.1620.9823.0320.8723.0521.2623.0220.8023.2620.9522.6021.3122.9921.6822.8520.8923.2021.8223.6821.81

[back to top]

Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01266227.1027.3526.1122.1128.2128.3229.0425.99

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale

Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=371, 353)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=137, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α18.5116.3717.0817.1817.9217.5618.4018.3718.8118.4719.0218.2418.4518.7619.2219.1020.2020.0419.8819.4018.8918.8118.8019.1319.6318.5919.6219.7219.8619.8318.8918.6119.3518.7119.0819.0019.6419.1020.0020.22
SU01124818.9317.9218.7818.3719.5118.5819.9318.8620.2719.0219.7419.2119.6919.1220.2919.3319.8719.2719.9519.2219.8119.1219.9819.4220.0219.6520.0419.0720.1319.2419.8019.5320.2019.6719.7619.4720.1819.5920.5020.15

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.0
IFN-α22.3

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale

Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (370, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 196)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=171, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α17.0617.4017.5217.7318.1318.1718.8018.3919.0018.7018.6018.1418.0818.5518.5418.5518.9818.7618.9218.3618.9718.5218.8719.4518.6318.9718.0518.7618.2418.7517.2616.8318.2818.0019.6219.5519.0918.2018.6718.67
SU01124817.1517.7618.4618.4618.8218.5319.0418.7619.1818.6318.9918.7319.0818.6919.3318.9819.2518.9319.3218.7118.9219.1019.1419.0619.3819.3919.5519.2319.5719.4119.5419.3319.9519.6619.6419.3419.9419.6120.0019.75

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=368, 346)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=345, 316)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 199)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 149)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=206, 78)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 66)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=150, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=134, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=139, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 29)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=126, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 20)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α81.2274.9177.0277.0579.3578.4280.8680.4681.9680.6081.9779.7080.3981.0681.2581.3184.5083.1484.0381.7981.6080.2080.9981.7381.1880.6781.2281.5781.6680.8878.2078.3881.8078.9682.2482.2782.4879.6381.7079.54
SU01124882.3078.7582.8880.5184.2480.5985.3282.0886.4082.2384.9082.5485.0182.1686.8383.0585.8182.7185.3282.1484.7581.9185.3182.4385.5083.6185.2482.3486.2482.6484.7783.3886.7884.4285.7483.5187.1684.5487.9684.62

[back to top] [back to top]

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 351)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α46.0940.9342.3342.0143.6443.1344.7844.0344.8244.4145.3844.0745.0944.6545.3845.1046.8846.1646.2245.1646.2645.4646.0846.0046.2545.8446.0846.1045.6245.3043.6443.4645.5943.6444.9245.2746.6444.4745.0046.00
SU01124846.4542.7145.9843.7546.6044.0146.9945.0847.9944.9947.6145.4047.8445.3948.2445.8348.3145.7947.9045.7047.9045.2847.9045.6748.0245.6547.9045.1048.2645.3747.7545.9548.0746.2747.4745.3647.7046.0748.8846.26

[back to top]

EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index

EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=363, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (346, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (326, 244)Cycle 2 Day 28 (311, 233)Cycle 3 Day 1 (287, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (283, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (261, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (240, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (224, 100)Cycle 7 Day 1 (205, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (204, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (190, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (168, 45)Cycle 10 Day 1 (161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (153, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (138, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (114, 26)Cycle 13 Day 28 (115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (114, 25)Cycle 14 Day 28 (107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (100, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (95, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (93, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (84, 15)Cycle 17 Day 28 (82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (71, 10)Cycle 19 Day 1 (69, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (63, 8)Cycle 20 Day 28 (54, 9)
IFN-α0.760.700.750.740.760.750.800.790.790.780.800.800.800.810.820.810.840.840.850.820.850.840.820.850.830.820.860.870.880.880.840.830.880.830.860.840.880.720.850.86
SU0112480.760.720.780.730.780.750.800.760.800.760.800.770.810.770.820.770.800.780.810.780.800.750.810.770.810.770.810.750.800.750.790.760.790.770.810.760.810.780.810.77

[back to top]

Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)

EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=365, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=323, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 139)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 118)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 104)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=237, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 98)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=209, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=191, 60)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 50)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=168, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=160, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=92, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=78, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=54, 9)
IFN-α71.4367.6670.4570.7072.6871.4572.7472.2073.4472.5773.6872.2673.8073.4674.2774.3377.6676.5776.6476.6975.0672.2175.1973.8477.5273.5676.6976.4476.6276.5074.8473.1176.9472.8674.4273.8279.2768.5576.0075.44
SU01124873.8069.3575.0572.0676.2372.3377.4675.1579.8375.1378.8376.8179.3976.0981.3477.5380.0876.2479.1876.4479.7276.8180.8476.7180.5977.2280.3976.5380.5076.5179.8575.5180.7477.1080.4077.7681.4777.0581.1076.85

[back to top]

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=27)
Total Drug: SU011248 and SU01266284.3684.9476.3767.1592.4388.2287.4980.30

[back to top]

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01124857.2657.5950.2645.0564.2259.9058.4554.31

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

,
Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
Plasma VEGF-A: Baseline (n=33, 31)Plasma VEGF-A: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D1: C1D1 (n=32, 21)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D28: C1D1 (n=31, 20)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D1: C1D1 (n=27, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D28: C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D1: C1D1 (n=27, 12)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D28: C1D1 (n=25, 11)Plasma VEGF-C: Baseline (n=35, 31)Plasma VEGF-C: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D1:C1D1 (n=30, 21)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D28:C1D1 (n=31, 19)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D1:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D28:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C4D1:C1D1 (n=28, 12)Plasma VEGF-C: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=26, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: Baseline (n=29, 30)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C1D28:C1D1 (n=27, 25)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D1:C1D1 (n=28, 20)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D28:C1D1 (n=28, 19)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D1:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D28:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4D1:C1D1 (n=24, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=23, 10)PLASMA IL-8: Baseline (n=31, 29)PLASMA IL-8: C1D28:C1D1 (n=29, 25)PLASMA IL-8: C2D1:C1D1 (n=29, 20)PLASMA IL-8: C2D28:C1D1 (n=29, 19)PLASMA IL-8: C3D1:C1D1 (n=26, 15)PLASMA IL-8: C3D28:C1D1 (n=26, 14)PLASMA IL-8: C4D1:C1D1 (n=26, 12)PLASMA IL-8: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=25, 11)PLASMA bFGF: Baseline (n=21, 2)PLASMA bFGF: C1D28:C1D1 (n=15, 1)PLASMA bFGF: C2D1:C1D1 (n=13, 1)
IFN-α109.01.1341.1711.1531.2531.1491.2091.008651.21.1651.1771.0811.1741.0541.3821.13940317.71.0681.0751.1501.0151.0421.1831.04418.62.2971.5791.8581.5311.9991.6622.49213.60.4290.157
SU011248101.94.2801.1615.8511.6305.2361.4864.924556.40.9451.0450.8711.1591.0431.2431.20744049.30.4730.7870.4070.8000.4270.8460.48610.12.8151.7162.4232.7882.5741.9342.54913.12.7621.370

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.1
IFN-α22.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124852.9
IFN-α64.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124856.3
IFN-α48.1

[back to top]

Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: post study measurement

Interventionratio (Number)
SU0112480
IFN-α0

[back to top]

Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248145
IFN-α29

[back to top]

Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248171
IFN-α45

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU011248114.6
IFN-α94.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment

Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124848.3
IFN-α22.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment

Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124847.7
IFN-α22.1

[back to top]

Clinical Response as Measured by RECIST

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00085436)
Timeframe: monthly, then every 2-3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment50

[back to top]

Immunity as Measured by T-cell and Antibody Responses to the Tumor

All patients receiving at least one week of treatment and have at least two time points available for assessment of immune parameters will be include in the evaluation of immune status. (NCT00085436)
Timeframe: monthly for 5 months

Interventionpg/mL (picogram/milliliter) (Number)
IP-10 Pre treatmentIP-10 Post treatment
Vaccine, Aldesleukin-2, Interferon-a126521

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

SVR [ Sustained virological response] SVR was defined as HCV RNA levels below the limit of detection 24 weeks after the end of treatment. (NCT00085917)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pegasys Single Dose11
Pegasys Double Dose11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Normalization of Liver Enzymes

normalization of liver enzymes :Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): Normal 6 - 41 U/L Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) : Normal 9 - 34 U/L (NCT00085917)
Timeframe: week 24, week 48, week 72

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pegasys Single Dose11
Pegasys Double Dose11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Adverse Events~- Anemia, Neutropenia and Psychiatric adverse events" (NCT00085917)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pegasys Single Dose11
Pegasys Double Dose11

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Influenza-like, headache, and gastrointestinal symptoms (NCT00100659)
Timeframe: At any time up to 72 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Influenza-like symptomsHeadacheGastrointestinal symptoms
Pegylated Interferon/Placebo503037
Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin503431

[back to top]

Sustained Viral Response (SVR)

SVR is defined as nondetectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in plasma (NCT00100659)
Timeframe: at least 24 weeks after stopping treatment.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PEG/RV29
PEG/Placebo12

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Neutralising Antibody (NAb) Positive at Anytime During the Study

The NAb positive value was defined as NAb value greater or equal to 20 NU/mL. NAbs were detected using a viral cytopathic assay. (NCT00110396)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rebif New Formulation (RNF) Cohort49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Binding Antibodies (BAb) at Week 96

Presence of BAbs. BAbs were measured by ELISA (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). (NCT00110396)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Rebif New Formulation (RNF) Cohort74

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Neutralising Antibody (NAb) Positive at the Week 96 Visit.

The NAb positive value was defined as NAb value greater or equal to 20 NU/mL. NAbs were detected using a viral cytopathic assay. (NCT00110396)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rebif New Formulation (RNF) Cohort45

[back to top]

Average of All Trough Plasma Concentrations

Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID). (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From start of treatment of the first subject until 15 months later assessed every 4 weeks.

Intervention100*mg/L (Geometric Mean)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600mg93.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period

Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg7.5
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg7.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period

Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg4.4
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg9.2

[back to top]

Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period

Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg5.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg14.8
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg26.9

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival According to the Investigator Assessment (Second Intervention Period)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg4.5
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg5.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg5.7
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg5.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg5.6
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg7.0

[back to top]

Slope - Change in Trough Concentration/Cycle

Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID (bis in die, twice daily)) to assess any potential trends in trough concentration over time. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From start of treatment of the first subject until 15 months later assessed every 4 weeks.

Intervention100*(mg/L/cycle) (Mean)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600mg-8.3

[back to top]

Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period

Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg3.5
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg5.4

[back to top]

Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period

Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg1.7

[back to top]

Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the First Intervention Period

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst). (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
0= Fully active without restriction1= Restricted in physically strenuous activity2= Ambulatory, capable of all selfcare3= Capable of limited selfcare4= Completely disabled5= Dead
Interferon Therapy in Period 1194221520
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 1204820511

[back to top]

Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the Second Intervention Period

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst). (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks

,
Interventionparticipant s (Number)
0= Fully active without restriction1= Restricted in physically strenuous activity2= Ambulatory, capable of all selfcare3= Capable of limited selfcare4= Completely disabled5= Dead
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)162610510
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)52510410

[back to top]

Disease Control (DC) According to Independent Central Review for the First Intervention Period

Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
disease control (CR or PR or SD)no disease controlUnknown
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg59249
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg771010

[back to top]

Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period

Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
disease control (CR or PR or SD)no disease controlUnknown
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg62246
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg8377

[back to top]

Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period

Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
disease control (CR or PR or SD)no disease controlUnknown
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg4966
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg25168

[back to top]

Tumor Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period

Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Evaluated
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg1751249
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg05721010

[back to top]

Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period

Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Evaluated
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg11348246
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg0216277

[back to top]

Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period

Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Evaluated
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg1113766
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg0025168

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the First Intervention Period

The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 140.5
Interferon Therapy in Period 134.6

[back to top]

Time to Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period

Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg Then 600 mg1.8
First Interferon Then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg5.4

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the First Intervention Period

The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 1104
Interferon Therapy in Period 193

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the Second Intervention Period

The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)89.7
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)108.4

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) After Intervention for the First Intervention Period

"The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions: I have been short in breath and I have been coughing; its score ranges from 0 to 8." (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 16.4
Interferon Therapy in Period 15.1

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period

"The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions: I have been short in breath and I have been coughing; its score ranges from 0 to 8." (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)5.7
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)6.4

[back to top]

Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period

The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)34.6
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)42.3

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 182
Interferon Therapy in Period 166

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)86.5
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)82.5

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 152
Interferon Therapy in Period 142

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)56.9
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)40.3

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 160
Interferon Therapy in Period 146

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 400 mg in Period 163
Interferon Therapy in Period 146

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)61.3
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)57.6

[back to top]

Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period

The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated. (NCT00117637)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sorafenib 600 mg (as Dose Escalation After 400 mg)39.9
Sorafenib 400 mg (After Interferon Therapy)35.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response for Participants With Stable Disease (N=37) Following Treatment

Duration of response for participants with disease stabilization following treatment as measured from the date response is confirmed to the date of disease progression, first assessed up to 8 weeks (2 cycles) following start of treatment. The duration of a Stable Disease (SD) response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for that specific SD response until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). Repeat radiologic studies (CT, MRI, Chest x-ray and bone scan as indicated) to evaluate disease progression or response every 8 weeks. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: From the date response is confirmed to the date of disease progression, up to 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sorafenib Tosylate or Sorafenib Plus Interferon5.7

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Evaluated Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

ORR defined as participants with Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) as defined by RECIST criteria: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): >30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, reference baseline sum LD. Progressive Disease (PD): >20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions, reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, reference smallest sum LD since treatment started. Radiologic testing for progressive disease repeated every 8 weeks. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: Tumor restaging performed at 8 weeks following baseline, responding or stable participants restaged at 8 week intervals, up to 12 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sorafenib Tosylate30
Sorafenib Tosylate, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b25

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time interval from the start of protocol therapy to death or disease progression. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sorafenib Tosylate7.39
Sorafenib Tosylate, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b7.56

[back to top]

Best Overall Response for Participants

Best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). The participant's best response assignment will depend on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria as defined by RECIST: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): >30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, reference baseline sum LD. Progressive Disease (PD): >20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions, reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, reference smallest sum LD since treatment started. Radiologic testing for progressive disease repeated every 8 weeks. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: From the date response is confirmed to the date of disease progression, first assessed 2 months (8 weeks) following start of treatment and reassessed up to 36 months (on average reassessed 12 months or less).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Inevaluable
Sorafenib Tosylate1111765
Sorafenib Tosylate, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b0102073

[back to top]

Selected Grade 3-4 Adverse Events Using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0

Adverse events graded using the CTCAE version 4.0 tabulated by treatment arm within either toxicity grade for the treatment period. Treatment-related toxicity (acute and cumulative) performed every 8 weeks during the first year. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FatigueDiarrheaHand-Foot SyndromeHyperuricemiaHyperamylasemia or LipasemiaDyspneaHypophosphatemiaNeutropeniaHypertensionNausea and vomitingRash/DesquamationProteinuriaSyncope (Fainting)Weight LossTransaminitisHyponatremiaNonneutropenic InfectionSensory NeuropathyCardiac Ischemia/InfarctionAppendicitisPancreatitisAdrenal InsufficiencyReversible Posterior LeukonencephalopathySmall Bowel ObstructionPneumonitis
Sorafenib Tosylate10131012543021210002211110011
Sorafenib Tosylate, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b13873445633223331010001100

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival defined as the time interval from the start of protocol therapy to death or date of last follow-up if alive. (NCT00126594)
Timeframe: From the start of protocol therapy to death or date of last follow-up, up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sorafenib TosylateNA
Sorafenib Tosylate, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b27.04

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival

"Overall survival is time from randomization until death from any cause.~Will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Participants will be assessed for up to 10 years. 5 year overall survival is provided as a summary." (NCT00134030)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of death.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MAP-GR84
MAPifn84
MAP-PR68
MAPIE68

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

"EFS is defined as time from randomisation to the first of: death, detection of local recurrence or metastasis, progression of metastatic disease, or detection of a secondary malignancy.~EFS will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Follow up per participant will be assessed for up to 10 years. The 3 year EFS is provided as a summary." (NCT00134030)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of the event.

InterventionPercentage EFS (Number)
MAP-GR74
MAPifn77
MAP-PR55
MAPIE53

[back to top]

Toxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0

Percentages of patients experiencing grade 3 and 4 adverse events. These will be compared using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate. (NCT00134030)
Timeframe: Adverse events are assessed for up to 10 years per participant.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MAP-GR348
MAPifn340
MAP-PR287
MAPIE281

[back to top]

Determination of the Effect of PEG-Intron 0.5mg Per kg Weekly sc Versus Colchicine 0.6mg Bid Daily on:

number of patients with a liver related outcomes including: mortality, liver transplant, variceal or portal hypertensive bleeding,Development of jaundice, ascites or encephalopathy with an increase in CPT of > 2 points and development of hepatoma (NCT00179413)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG-Intron53
Colchicine59

[back to top]

Development of Portal Hypertension

Number of patients who develop endoscopic evidence of varices over 4 year period (NCT00179413)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG-Intron12
Colchicine24

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Long Term Maintenance PEG-Intron in Patients With Cirrhosis

Defined as the number of patients who discontinued therapy due to an adverse event side (NCT00179413)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG-Intron38
Colchicine20

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate

annualized # of relapses between years 0 and 10 (NCT00179478)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionannualized relapses per year (Mean)
Immediate Treatment Group0.16
Delayed Treatment Group0.33

[back to top]

Rate of Development of Clinical Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Over 10 Years

Percent cumulative probability of developing CDMS over 10 years . CDMS was defined as the development of new visual or neurological symptoms discrete from the patients initial event with objective findings on examination. (NCT00179478)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionPercent cumulative probability (Number)
Immediate Treatment Group58
Delayed Treatment Group69

[back to top]

The Number of New or Enlarging MRI T2 Lesions at 10 Years

These are counts of new or significantly enlarged lesions over 10 years on brain MRI reflecting interval radiographic disease activity (NCT00179478)
Timeframe: 10 years

Intervention# of new or enlarging T2 lesions (Median)
Immediate Treatment Group5
Delayed Treatment Group7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an EDSS > 3.5 at Study Completion

The EDSS is an ordinal scale of neurological impairment in Multiple Sclerosis with a range of 0 to 10 with 0.5 increments. A score of 0 is normal and 10 is death from MS. Scores from 1 to 3.5 are considered mild impairment , 4.0 to 6.5 is moderate and greater than 6.5 is severe impairment. (NCT00179478)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immediate Treatment Group7
Delayed Treatment Group5

[back to top]

Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time

"EDSS progression was defined as an increase in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 1.0 point compared to the lowest EDSS score obtained during the screening or baseline visit, if this score was <= 5.5. A confirmed EDSS progression status was defined as an EDSS progression observed at two consecutive scheduled visits at least 140 days apart from each other. The EDSS scale is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis in eight functional systems and values vary between 0=normal neurological examination and 10=death due to MS measured in half-points on a scale." (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage of particip. with EDSS progr. (Number)
Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 2Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 3Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 5
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)12.816.824.9
Initial Placebo19.925.328.9

[back to top]

Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time

"CDMS could be reached due to a qualifying relapse or sustained progression of 1.5 points on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as compared to the lowest EDSS obtained during screening or Day 1. The validity of CDMS diagnoses was confirmed by a central committee. The EDSS scale quantifies disability in MS in 8 functional systems, values vary between 0=normal neurological examination and 10=death due to MS measured in half-points on an ordinal scale. Time to CDMS = date of CDMS - date of Day 1 + 1 or time to CDMS = date of last clinical visit - date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored)" (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

,
Interventioncum. percentage of particip. with CDMS (Number)
Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 2Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 3Kaplan-Meier estimate at year 5
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)26.936.746.2
Initial Placebo45.051.257.3

[back to top]

Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria

MS according to the criteria by McDonald was reached if, in addition to the single clinical demyelinating event, both dissemination in space and dissemination in time were established by MRI-criteria or a new relapse. Time to McDonald MS is the difference of date of McDonald MS to the date of Day 1 + 1. For subjects without McDonald MS, time to McDonald MS is the difference from the maximum (date of last magnetic resonance imaging scan, date of last clinical visit) to the date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored observation). (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)9.4
Initial Placebo6

[back to top]

Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or the reappearance of a neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. The time to the onset of recurrent relapses was determined for each subject according to the counting process representation for recurrent events. Time to a relapse was right-censored if a relapse-risk period ended without relapse. Based on the Andersen-Gill model the hazard ratio for recurrent relapses was estimated. Annualized relapse rates are provided as another outcome measure. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

InterventionRatio (Number)
All Subjects0.797

[back to top]

Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate

The annualized relapse rate is defined as total number of relapses up to month 60 divided by the total observation time (last clinical visit minus first day of study treatment administration plus 1 of all participants) in years. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

Interventionnumber of relapses per patient and year (Mean)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)0.2139
Initial Placebo0.2695

[back to top]

MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Percentage Change of Brain Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60

Two-timepoint percentage brain volume change was estimated with Structural Image Evaluation, using Normalisation, of Atrophy (SIENA) software. The measurements describe the percentage change from screening in brain volume at month 60. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: 60 months after start of treatment

InterventionPercentage of brain volume (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)-2.281
Initial Placebo-1.771

[back to top]

MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of Volume of Black Holes From Screening MRI to Month 60

Absolute change of volume of black holes from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as volume of black holes at month 60 minus volume of black holes at screening. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: 60 months after start of treatment

Interventioncubic millimeter (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)0
Initial Placebo0

[back to top]

Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60

"The MSFC score consists of three sub-tests (Timed-25-Foot-Walk, 9-Hole-Peg-Test, 3 Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test [PASAT]). Standardized results (Z-scores) of the sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of the three Z-scores were derived using baseline data pooled over both treatment arms as reference population. Higher Z-scores reflect a better neurological status." (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: 60 months after start of treatment

InterventionZ-scores (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)0.226
Initial Placebo0.225

[back to top]

MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of T2 Lesion Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60

Absolute change of T2 lesion volume from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as T2 lesion volume at month 60 minus T2 lesion volume at screening. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: 60 months after start of treatment

Interventioncubic millimeter (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)-123.0
Initial Placebo-194.5

[back to top]

MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60

Newly active lesions are defined as displaying either new Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancement on T1-weighted scans or non-enhancement on T1-weighted scan but new on T2-weighted scan. The numbers of newly active lesions on yearly MRI scans were summed up to the cumulative number. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: up to 60 months after start of treatment

Interventioncumulative number of lesions (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)4
Initial Placebo7

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60

As an index of health related quality of life in people diagnosed with MS, the FAMS Trial Outcome Index covers overall physical health (sum of sub-scale scores Mobility, Symptoms, Thinking/Fatigue, Additional Concerns) with a score range from 0 to 148. A higher score reflects a higher overall physical health as reported by patients. (NCT00185211)
Timeframe: 60 months after start of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon Beta-1b)125
Initial Placebo125

[back to top]

Chest Cavity Size

(NCT00201123)
Timeframe: 16 Weeks

,,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Baseline16 Weeks
Aerosol Interferon Gamma for TB3929
DOTS Control Group3420
Subcutaneous Interferon Gamma for TB3418

[back to top]

Sputum Conversion

(NCT00201123)
Timeframe: Measured at 16 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DOTS Control Group36
Aerosol Interferon Gamma for TB60
Subcutaneous Interferon Gamma for TB36

[back to top]

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) to Measure Flow of Cytometry and Cytokine Levels

(NCT00201123)
Timeframe: 16 Weeks

,,
Interventioncells/mL (Median)
Lymphocytes Week 0Lymphocytes Week 16Machrophages Week 0Machrophages Week 16Neutrophils Week 0Neutrophils Week 16
DOTS41560642811
Nebulized rlFN-y5156063244
Subcutaneous rlFN-y6226266302

[back to top]

Participants Achieving SVR Categorized by Time of Response

rapid virologic response assessed at 4 weeks, early virologic response assessed at 8-12 weeks, late virologic response assessed at 16-24 weeks (NCT00211692)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
rapid virologic response (n=20)early virologic response (n=13)late virologic response (n=9)
Overall1542

[back to top]

The Primary Endpoint Would be the Number Who Achieve a Sustained Virologic Response.

Overall sustained virologic response for entire cohort and individual sustained virologic response for different arms of study (NCT00211692)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A (52 Weeks Treatment)11
B (Duration Based on Viral Response)10

[back to top]

Overall Number of Serious Adverse Events

(NCT00211692)
Timeframe: through end of study up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Early From Study Treatment

(NCT00211692)
Timeframe: through end of study up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall26

[back to top]

Change in MRI Composite Score

MRI composite score (Z4 score) - the unweighted sum of the individual Z scores for enhanced tissue volume, T2 lesion burden, equivalence of the T1 hypointense lesion burden, normalized CSF (an inverse measure of atrophy with the appropriate sign so that all scores are directionally compatible - larger is worse) MRI enhancement status at baseline (0, 1-4, and 5 or more enhancing lesions) (NCT00211887)
Timeframe: Baseline to month 36

Interventionz score (Mean)
IFN + GA-0.02
IFB-1a0.05
Glatiramer0.10

[back to top]

ARR - PDEs

Annualized relapse rate of protocol-defined exacerbations Protocol defined relapse - an relapse seen within 7 days of onset, verified by the treating physician and independently observed as a change in EDSS by the examining physician. This relapse is defined as: the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to MS; accompanied by a change in the neurologic examination (defined as a 0.5 or greater increase in the EDSS over the last scheduled or unscheduled visit or a 2 point change in one functional system or a 1 point change in two functional systems, except bladder and cognitive changes); lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever; and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. (NCT00211887)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
IFN + GA0.12
IFB-1a0.16
Glatiramer0.11

[back to top]

Change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite

"positive indicates improvement~The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a scale measuring pyramidal functions, sensory functions, cerebellar functions, bowel & bladder functions,brain stem functions, mental functions, and visual functions from 0 to 6.~0= normal 6= severe loss" (NCT00211887)
Timeframe: Baseline to month 36

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
IFN + GA0.1
IFB-1a0.1
Glatiramer0.2

[back to top]

Confirmed Progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale

"% with EDSS progression~Confirmed progression in a participant was defined as a 1.0 increase in the EDSS from baseline, when baseline <=5.0; or an increase of 0.5 from baseline, when baseline >=5.5, sustained for 6 months (2 successive quarterly visits), as assessed by the blinded EDSS examiner and confirmed centrally." (NCT00211887)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IFN + GA23.9
IFB-1a21.6
Glatiramer24.8

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability as Defined by the Number of Subjects With Flu-like Syndrome, Fever, Myalgia, Injection Site Reactions, Injection Site Reactions Pain, Asthenia, Headache, Liver Function Abnormalities, and Bone Marrow Function Abnormalities

Outcome measures are given as the number of patients with common toxicity by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Toxicity grading is: Grade 1: no study drug action recommended, Grade 2: Dose reduction or interruption of study treatment should be considered (grade 2 Lymphocyte toxicity required no study drug action), Grade 3: Dose reduction or interruption should be considered; interruption is recommended, and Grade 4: Interruption of study drug is recommended (Grade 4 laboratory toxicity was reported as a serious adverse event). Liver and bone marrow abnormalities are measured by lab tests. (NCT00235989)
Timeframe: At End of Study Visit (week 234)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Incidence of flu-like syndromeIncidence of feverIncidence of myalgiaIncidence of injection site reactionsIncidence of injection site reactions painIncidence of astheniaIncidence of headacheIncidence of grade 1 toxicity (ALAT)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (ALAT)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (ALAT)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (ALAT)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (ASAT)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (ASAT)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (ASAT)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (ASAT)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (Bilirubin total)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (Bilirubin total)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (Bilirubin total)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (Bilirubin total)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (Leukocytes)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (Leukocytes)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (Leukocytes)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (Leukocytes)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (Lymphocytes)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (Lymphocytes)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (Lymphocytes)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (Lymphocytes)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (Platelets)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (Platelets)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (Platelets)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (Platelets)Incidence of grade 1 toxicity (Hemoglobin)Incidence of grade 2 toxicity (Hemoglobin)Incidence of grade 3 toxicity (Hemoglobin)Incidence of grade 4 toxicity (Hemoglobin)
ET: IFNB-1b 250 mcg => 250 mcg110204240002100100003100020000000000
ET: IFNB-1b 250 mcg => 500 mcg700303390007000140006200511000001000
ET: IFNB-1b 500 mcg => 250 mcg10030101000100040003000000000000000
ET: IFNB-1b 500 mcg => 500 mcg411412280008000101004100110000001010

[back to top]

Frequency (Number of Patients Per Group Defined by Cut Off Values and Per Treatment Arm) of Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Titer to IFNB-1b

Serum samples for analysis of NAbs to interferon (IFN) beta-1b were collected in Study 307000A. In the extension study, NAbs were also monitored for information on persistence or resolution. Serum samples of about 6 mL for NAbs were drawn at Weeks 10, 24, 52, 78, 104 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, 260, 286 or the EOS visit. (NU/ml=neutralizing units/ml). (NCT00235989)
Timeframe: At End of Study Visit (week 234)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NAbs titer, cut-off value 20 NU/ml (minimum)NAbs titer, cut-off value 100 NU/ml (minimum)NAbs titer, cut-off value 400 NU/ml (minimum)
ET: IFNB-1b 250 mcg => 250 mcg211
ET: IFNB-1b 250 mcg => 500 mcg321
ET: IFNB-1b 500 mcg => 250 mcg000
ET: IFNB-1b 500 mcg => 500 mcg521

[back to top]

Gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+)Lesion Number Change.

Before treatment is the number of lesions per image from months -3, -2, -1, and 0. During treatment is the number of lesions from months 1,2, and 3. The mean number of Gd+ lesions during each treatment period was calculated for each patient as the total number of Gd+ lesions observed across all images divided by the number of images. Hence, the mean number of Gd+ lesions per patient represents the number of lesions per MRI. (NCT00246324)
Timeframe: 8 months

InterventionGd+ lesions (Median)
Inteferon, Then Interferon With Doxycycline4.0

[back to top]

Relapse Rates, Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Levels, Transendothelial Migration of Monocytes

Only 1 patient relapsed. Correlations between decrease serum metalloproteinase 9 levels and enhancing lesion activity reduction. Transendothelial migration of monocytes was suppressed. Adverse effects were mild. No adverse synergistic effects of combination therapy. (NCT00246324)
Timeframe: 8 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Inteferon, Then Interferon With Doxycycline15

[back to top]

Number of Patients in Whom Tumor Was Resectable

Tumor response is measured in terms of resectability, as measured by CT scan at 2 weeks after completion of each course. A CT scan of the chest abdomen and pelvis will be performed in order to evaluate for the presence of metastatic disease. If no metastatic disease, emphasis will be paid to the local tumor. Evaluation of the growth/regression of the tumor will be made as it relates to resectability. If potential for resection then surgery will be recommended. This protocol will be followed after each cycle. (NCT00262951)
Timeframe: Up to 5 Years or Until Disease Progression

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

In all patients, measured from the date of the patient's registration in this study, until the date of the patient's death or date last known alive (if observation was censored). (NCT00262951)
Timeframe: Up to 5 Years or Date of Death, Whichever Occurred First

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients11.5

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response, Defined as a Plasma HCV-RNA (Hepatitis C Ribonucleic Acid) Level Below the LLQ (Lower Level of Quantitation) at 24 Weeks Post-treatment.

LLQ = 30 IU/mL by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Taqman Roche) (NCT00265395)
Timeframe: 48 or 72 weeks of treatment plus 24 weeks of follow-up.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Standard Therapy (48-week Treatment)37
Extended Therapy (72-week Treatment)35

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (Second-line Treatment)

"Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Ph chromosome (Ph+) containing metaphases) and the amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.~Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Major Cytogenic ResponseComplete Cytogenic ResponsePartial Cytogenic Response
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib86.081.05.0
Imatinib to IFN-a + Ara-C14.37.17.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (All Randomized Participants)

Overall survival was defined as the time between date of randomization and death due to any cause. The time was censored at last examination date for patients who were still being treated and at date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 542, 512)36 months (n = 518, 471)48 months (n = 492, 441)60 months (n = 475, 411)72 months (n = 461, 388)84 months (n = 446, 373)96 months (n = 430, 358)108 months (n = 391, 315)120 months (n = 368, 299)132 months (n = 356, 288)144 months (n = 250, 199)
IFN-a + Ara-C97.793.689.887.785.483.883.181.479.978.877.775.4
Imatinib (STI571)98.996.092.490.489.488.286.685.484.383.382.881.3

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC) (All Randomized Participants)

Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time between randomization and either of the following events on treatment: death (due to CML when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment) or progression to Accelerated Phase or Blast Crisis and is censored at last examination date for patients without event. No data after discontinuation of study treatment was included. The Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with survival without progression to AP/BC at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 513, 388)36 months (n = 461, 337)48 months (n = 431, 311)60 months (n = 409, 289 )72 months (n = 384, 265)84 months (n = 358, 236)96 months (n = 338, 220)108 months (n = 305, 189)120 months (n = 272, 175)132 months (n = 259, 165)144 months (n = 145, 94)
IFN-a + Ara-C92.990.087.984.783.583.182.482.482.482.482.482.4
Imatinib (STI571)98.595.794.093.192.792.792.792.492.192.192.192.1

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Event Free Survival (All Randomized Participants)

"Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:~progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)~loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)~loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) confirmed~loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed~increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)~death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).~Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with Event Free Survival at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 505, 332)36 months (n = 448, 263)48 months (n = 415, 241)60 months (n = 395, 223)72 months (n = 376, 207)84 months (n = 352, 181)96 months (n = 334, 166)108 months (n = 301, 141)120 months (n = 269, 130)132 months (n = 257, 124)144 months (n = 143, 76)
IFN-a + Ara-C79.470.067.063.761.960.159.058.356.656.656.651.8
Imatinib (STI571)96.689.685.383.983.283.082.081.079.979.679.679.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (Second-line Treatment)

A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib to IFN-a + Ara-C2
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib160

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (First-line Treatment)

"Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases) and amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.~Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Major Cytogenic ResponseComplete Cytogenic ResponsePartial Cytogenic Response
IFN-a + Ara-C23.311.611.8
Imatinib (STI571)89.082.86.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (First-line Treatment)

A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib (STI571)226
IFN-a + Ara-C163

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (Second-line Treatment)

Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 86)24 months (n = 62)36 months (n = 130)48 months (n = 216)60 months (n = 174)72 months (n = 146)84 months (n = 139)96 months (n = 138)108 months (n = 120)120 months (n = 84)132 months (n = 31)144 months
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib51.269.478.581.986.291.186.387.090.085.790.3NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (First-line Treatment)

Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n= 305, 83)24 months (n= 102, 12)36 months (n= 68, 7)48 months (n= 305, 12)60 months (n= 316, 10)72 months (n= 292, 9)84 months (n= 247, 8)96 months (n= 228, 4)108 months (n= 233, 0)120 months (n= 204, 0)132 months (n= 168, 0)144 months (n= 1, 0)
IFN-a + Ara-C9.625.028.658.3100.088.987.5100.0NANANANA
Imatinib (STI571)50.269.676.577.088.088.091.992.593.693.192.3100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival Events (All Randomized Participants)

"Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:~progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)~loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)~loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) confirmed~loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed~increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)~death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).~The percentage of participants with Event Free Survival events in each category was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Participants with eventsProgression to AP or BCLoss of CHRLoss of MCyR (confirmed)Loss of MCyR (unconfirmed)Increase of WBCDeath
IFN-a + Ara-C32.212.87.65.41.13.41.8
Imatinib (STI571)17.96.92.74.20.90.23.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Week 12 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00336479)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 60)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week36.0
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week58.2
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week53.2
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week35.3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse

Viral relapse was defined as having detectable HCV RNA during antiviral follow-up. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00336479)
Timeframe: After last dose of study drug up to antiviral follow-up (up to Week 72)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week3
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week1
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week3

[back to top]

Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir

Only subjects who received telaprevir were to be analyzed for this outcome. Maximum, minimum and average plasma concentrations observed during assessment period were reported. (NCT00336479)
Timeframe: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
CmaxCminCavg
Telaprevir3032.482235.512738.46

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT00336479)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week754
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week7910
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week173
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week795

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00336479)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week41.3
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week67.1
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week60.8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week35.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free of 3-month and 6-month Disability Progression Assessed With the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at the End of the Extension Phase of the Study

The EDSS is a scale for assessing disability in 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, other functions). An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) is calculated. Disability progression was determined by the EDSS score based on the following criteria: One point increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. Percent of patients free of disability progression was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (up to approximately 4.5 years)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Free of 3-month progressionFree of 6-month progression
Fingolimod 0.5 mg71.2879.76
Fingolimod 1.25 mg67.0179.54
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg73.4081.61

[back to top]

Number of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Lesions in Comparison With Baseline in the Core Phase of the Study

The number of new or newly enlarged T2 lesions in comparison to baseline was assessed with T2-weighted magnetic resonance image (MRI) scans. A T2-weighted MRI scan utilizes particular values of the echo time (TE) and the repetition time (TR) parameters of image acquisition. Inflammation and tissue damage are seen as bright areas in T2 images and are often referred to as T2 lesions. T2-weighted MRI scans are a sensitive way to evaluate the brain for demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

InterventionT2 lesions (Mean)
Fingolimod 1.25 mg1.6
Fingolimod 0.5 mg1.6
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg2.6

[back to top]

Estimated Annualized Aggregate Relapse Rate (ARR) in the Core Phase of the Study

The ARR is defined as the number of confirmed relapses in a year. A relapse is defined as the appearance of a new or worsening of a previously stable or improving pre existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever or infection. The annualized ARR for each treatment group was calculated using negative binomial regression adjusted by treatment, country, number of relapses in the previous 2 years, and the baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

InterventionEstimate relapses per year (Number)
Fingolimod 1.25 mg0.203
Fingolimod 0.5 mg0.161
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg0.331

[back to top]

Number of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Lesions in the Extension Phase of the Study

The number of new or newly enlarged T2 lesions in comparison to baseline was assessed with T2-weighted magnetic resonance image (MRI) scans. A T2-weighted MRI scan utilizes particular values of the echo time (TE) and the repetition time (TR) parameters of image acquisition. Inflammation and tissue damage are seen as bright areas in T2 images and are often referred to as T2 lesions. T2-weighted MRI scans are a sensitive way to evaluate the brain for demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Month 12 to end of study (up to approximately 3.5 years)

,,
InterventionT2 lesions (Mean)
Month 12 to Month 24Month 24 to Month 36, n=255, 289, 258Month 36 to Month 48, n=36, 34, 35Last MRI scan to end of study, n=275, 309, 290
Fingolimod 0.5 mg0.871.040.590.86
Fingolimod 1.25 mg1.081.400.971.75
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg0.970.720.491.03

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free of 3-month Disability Progression Assessed With the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at the End of the Core Phase of the Study

The EDSS is a scale for assessing disability in 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, other functions). An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) is calculated. Disability progression was determined by the EDSS score based on the following criteria: One point increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. Percent of patients free of disability progression was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fingolimod 1.25 mg93.3
Fingolimod 0.5 mg94.1
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg92.1

[back to top]

Estimated Annualized Aggregate Relapse Rate (ARR) in the Core and Extension Phases of the Study

The ARR is defined as the number of confirmed relapses in a year. A relapse is defined as the appearance of a new or worsening of a previously stable or improving pre existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever or infection. The annualized ARR for each treatment group was calculated using negative binomial regression adjusted by treatment, country, number of relapses in the previous 2 years, and the baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score. (NCT00340834)
Timeframe: Month 0 to end of study (up to approximately 4.5 years)

,,
InterventionEstimated relapses per year (Number)
Month 12 to Month 24, n=330, 356, 341Month 24 to Month 36, n=287, 321, 293Month 36 to Month 48, n=267, 303, 271Month 48 to end of study, n=36, 38, 29Month 0 to end of study, n=420, 429, 431
Fingolimod 0.5 mg0.1820.110NANA0.166
Fingolimod 1.25 mg0.1560.116NANA0.192
Interferon β-1a µg/Fingolimod 1.25 or 0.5 mg0.2660.121NANA0.271

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Median number of days to progression of disease in participants who stopped all treatment as directed by the protocol. (NCT00363649)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm A82
Arm B98

[back to top]

Early Discontinuation

Number of participants unable to complete protocol-specified treatment due to toxicity. (NCT00363649)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A10
Arm B0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Number of patients alive and without disease progression or relapse (NCT00363649)
Timeframe: 1 year after treatment has been stopped

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A2
Arm B0

[back to top]

Time to Complete Molecular Remission

Number of months from randomization to molecular remission as defined by polymerase chain reaction negativity. (NCT00363649)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A10
Arm B16.3

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate

Percentage of patients who achieved molecular remission as defined by polymerase chain reaction negativity. (NCT00363649)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A61.1
Arm B62.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Testing Positive for Neutralising Antibody (NAb)

Participants who were NAb+ at 48 weeks (or at the last available NAb assessment up to Week 48). The NAb+ value was defined as NAb ≥ 20 NU/ml. (NCT00367484)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

InterventionNAb+ participants (Number)
Rebif® (Clone 484-39)73

[back to top]

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability. The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability. (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pre-treatmentWeek 24
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)2.061.81

[back to top]

Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. A major relapse was defined based on changes on EDSS with the following additional criteria to be met: objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS score or increase of the total EDSS score. Relapses which did not meet the criteria of major relapses were considered as non-major. (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionrelapses (Number)
MajorNon-major
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)112

[back to top]

Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses

"A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. In the categories listed below, N signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints, and same subjects were counted more than once under each category." (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: 3 and 6 months

Interventionrelapses (Number)
3 months (N=6)6 months (N=6)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)67

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression

The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability.The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability. An EDSS progression was defined as increase in EDSS greater than or equal to (>=) 1.0 points (in the treatment period as compared to baseline). (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)87.2

[back to top]

Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new T2 lesions per three months) based on non-enhancing lesions on T1 weighted scans (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment

Interventionlesions (Median)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)0

[back to top]

Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

"In the categories listed below, N signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints." (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Interventioncubic millimeter (mm^3) (Mean)
Baseline (N=39)Week 12 (N=38)Week 24 (N=37)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)58593648

[back to top]

Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new Gd-enhancing lesions per three months) (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment

Interventionlesions (Median)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)-0.5

[back to top]

Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature more than (>) 37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. The relapse rate was calculated on an annualized basis. Annualized relapse rate is the average number of relapses in a year calculated by negative binomial regression as the sum of confirmed relapses of all subjects in the group divided by the sum of the number of days on study of all subjects in the group and multiplied by 365.25. (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)0.38

[back to top]

Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: After 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)84.6

[back to top]

Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

"In the categories listed below, N signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints." (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Baseline (N=39)Week 12 (N=38)Week 24 (N=37)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)2.80.50.8

[back to top]

Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

"In the categories listed below, N signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints." (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Baseline (N=39)Week 12 (N=38)Week 24 (N=37)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)48.748.844.6

[back to top]

Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

The primary efficacy variable was calculated by subtracting the number of newly active lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of newly active lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of newly active lesions per three months, new lesion frequency per 3 months) (NCT00370071)
Timeframe: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment

Interventionlesions (Median)
Interferon Beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)-1.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Combined Response Consisting of All Three Responses - (a) Serological Response, (b) Virological Response, and (c) Biochemical Response

"Serological response is defined as Loss of HBeAg (Hepatitis B e antigen) and Appearance of anti-HBe (Hepatitis B e antibodies); participant is HBeAg negative and anti-HBe positive.~Virological response was defined as having < 10^5 copies/mL of serum HBV DNA (Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid) by real-time PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction).~Biochemical response was defined as acheiving normal levels of ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) level in Units/L." (NCT00371761)
Timeframe: At Week 72 [for Pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron), at 48 weeks post PegIntron treatment for up to 24 weeks; for Adefovir, at 24 weeks post adefovir treatment for up to 48 weeks]

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PegIntron0
Adefovir0

[back to top]

Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir

Only subjects who received telaprevir were to be analyzed for this outcome. Maximum, minimum and average plasma concentrations observed during assessment period were reported. (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
CmaxCminCavg
Telaprevir337025103055

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week818
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week8016
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 12 Week789
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week8211

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse

Viral relapse was defined as having detectable HCV RNA during antiviral follow-up. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: After last dose of study drug up to antiviral follow-up (up to Week 72)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week10
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week19
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 12 Week22

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: Completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week54.9
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week70.4
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week80.5
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 12 Week61.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week46.3
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week69.1
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week59.8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 12 Week35.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Week 12 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00372385)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 60)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week47.6
Telaprevir 12 Week +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week69.1
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Week59.8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 12 Week37.2

[back to top]

A Sustained Virologic Response (SVR), Defined as a Plasma HCV RNA Level Below the Lower Level of Quantitation (LLQ) at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

Number of participants with SVR at 24-week follow up after treatment with PEG-Intron and Ribavirin in post-orthotopic liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV. (NCT00378599)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after completion of up to 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PEG-Intron Plus Ribavirin36

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 weeks after last dose of study drug (up to Week 50)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week1119
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week1126
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week1056
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week11316

[back to top]

Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin) and Average (Cavg) Plasma Concentration of Telaprevir

Only subjects who received telaprevir were to be analyzed for this outcome. Maximum, minimum and average plasma concentrations observed during assessment period were reported. (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
CmaxCminCavg
Telaprevir275523352610

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week51.3
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week53.1
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week24.3
PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week14.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA at Completion of Study Drug Dosing

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: Completion of study drug dosing (up to Week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week75.7
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week67.3
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week54.1
PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week29.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HCV RNA

"Percentage of subjects with undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after last dose of study drug for treatment group PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week and at 48 weeks after last dose of study drug for treatment groups Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week, Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week and Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week were presented. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL)." (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: Up to Week 96 (24 weeks after last dose of study drug for PBO group; 48 weeks after last dose of study drug for telaprevir groups)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week48.7
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week44.2
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week22.5
PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week14.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse

Viral relapse was defined as having detectable HCV RNA during antiviral follow-up. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00420784)
Timeframe: After last dose of study drug up to 24 week antiviral follow-up (up to Week 72)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week26
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week10
Telaprevir 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a 24 Week32
PBO 24 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response

"Participants were tested for the presence of Hepatitis C Virus-Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) in blood by Qualitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). If the HCV-RNA is not detectable, the participant is negative for HCV-RNA.~Sustained virologic responders were participants negative for HCV-RNA at 24 weeks following the completion of therapy. A Participant that withdrew prior to 24 weeks following the completion of therapy was considered a non-responder." (NCT00423800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
RespondersNon-responders
Pegetron® - 24 Weeks30
Pegetron® - 48 Weeks11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Virological Relapse

"Participants were tested for the presence of Hepatitis C Virus-Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) in blood by Qualitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).~Virological relapse in participants was defined as having negative virology (HCV-RNA) at end of treatment, but positive virology (HCV-RNA) again at 24 weeks of follow up post treatment." (NCT00423800)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with Virological RelapseParticipants with No Virological Relapse
Pegetron® - 24 Weeks03
Pegetron® - 48 Weeks01

[back to top]

Diameter of Injection Site Redness

Blinded assessment of mean change in diameter of redness (in mm) at an injection site following an injection (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: 1-72 hours post injection over the first 12 weeks including the titration period

Interventionmm (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif8.28
Betaseron6.87

[back to top]

Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and 10 Minutes Post-injection Timepoints

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm on which subjects rate pain from no pain (0 mm) to worst possible pain (100 mm) was used. Mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient at pre-injection compared to mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient 10 minutes post injection. (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pre-injection to 10 minutes post-injection

InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif0.70
Betaseron1.89

[back to top]

Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and Immediately After Injection Timepoints

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm on which subjects rate pain from no pain (0 mm) to worst possible pain (100 mm) was used. Mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient at pre-injection compared to mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient immediately after injection. (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pre-Injection to Immediately after Injection

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif1.46
Betaseron4.63

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Change in Mean (mm) VAS for Pre-injection and Immediately After Injection Timepoints

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm on which subjects rate pain from no pain (0 mm) to worst possible pain (100 mm) was used. Mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient at pre-injection compared to mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient immediately after injection. (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pre-injection and immediately after injection

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif1.67
Betaseron to New Formulation of Rebif2.50

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Change in Mean VAS at Pre-injection and 10 Minutes Post Injection

(NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pre-injection and 10 minutes post injection

InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif0.40
Betaseron to the New Formulation of Rebif0.91

[back to top]

Number of Pain Free Patients at 30 Minutes Post-injection

"A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm on which subjects rate pain from no pain (0 mm) to worst possible pain (100 mm) was used.~Pain-free was defined as a VAS score of 0 for all 21 full-dose injections for the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population." (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post injection

InterventionParticipants (Number)
New Formulation of Rebif31
Betaseron28

[back to top]

Primary Outcome - Extension Phase: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Patients Reported Pain; Change in Mean VAS at Pre-injection and 30 Minutes Post Injection

(NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pre-injection and 30 minutes post injection

InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif0.34
Betaseron to the New Formulation of Rebif0.42

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Diameter in Injection Site Redness

(NCT00428584)
Timeframe: 1 to 72 hours post injection

InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
New Formulation of Rebif10.79
Betaseron to the New Formulation of Rebif7.46

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Patient Reported Pain: Change in Mean VAS for the 21 Full-dose Injections at Pre-injection and 30 Minutes Post-injection Timepoints

Subject reported perception of pain on the VAS where the slash drawn by the patient represents pain of increasing intensity from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worse possible pain), measured in millimeters. Mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient at pre-injection compared to mean VAS of 21 injections for each patient 30 minutes post-injection (NCT00428584)
Timeframe: From pre-injection to 30 minutes post injection of the VAS pain scores across the first 21 injections of full dose therapy of a new formulation of rebif and Betaseron

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Mean Pre-Injection VAS ScoreMean VAS at 30 minutes Post-InjectionMean Change to 30 Minutes Post-Injection
Betaseron0.401.541.14
New Formulation of Rebif0.431.100.67

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome - Extension Phase: Number of Pain Free Patients at 30 Minutes Post Injection

(NCT00428584)
Timeframe: Pain free patients at 30 minutes post injection

InterventionParticipants (Number)
New Formulation of Rebif30
Betaseron to the New Formulation of Rebif36

[back to top]

Local and/or Systemic Solicited Symptoms After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of participants (frequency) reporting solicited (systematically collected on a Memory Aid) reactogenicity events of any severity and number reporting severe occurrences. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 0-7 days following immunization

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Elevated Oral Temperature - Any severityElevated Oral Temperature - SevereFeverishness - Any severityFeverishness - SevereMalaise - Any severityMalaise - SevereMyalgia - Any severityMyalgia - SevereHeadache - Any severityHeadache - SevereNausea - Any severityNausea - SevereNasal Obstruction - Any severityNasal Obstruction - SevereNasal Discharge - Any severityNasal Discharge - SevereSneezing - Any severitySneezing - SevereSore Throat - Any severitySore Throat - SevereCough - Any severityCough - SevereAny systemic symptom of any severitySevere systemic symptomAny local symptom of any severitySevere local symptomAny symptom of any severitySevere symptom
IVV With 10M IFN0020925012160901009011080202200262
IVV With 1M IFN00007070140109014010010050210220270
IVV Without IFN1011111511701110014013010050211240281

[back to top]

Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at 14 days after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 14 days after immunization.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HAI - A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 14HAI - A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 14Neutralization - A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 14Neutralization - A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 14
IVV With 10M IFN117910
IVV With 1M IFN13121213
IVV Without IFN16211316

[back to top]

Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at 28 days after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 28 days after immunization

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HAI - A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 28HAI - A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 28Neutralization - A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 28Neutralization - A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 28
IVV With 10M IFN117108
IVV With 1M IFN14201513
IVV Without IFN17231717

[back to top]

Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza B at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at 28 days after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 28 days after immunization

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HAI - B/Malaysia/2506/2004 at Day 28Neutralization - B/Malaysia/2506/2004 at Day 28
IVV With 10M IFN913
IVV With 1M IFN1613
IVV Without IFN1416

[back to top]

Unsolicited Adverse Events After Intranasal Immunization

Number of subjects (frequency) with spontaneous reports of Adverse Events of any severity and severe or higher severity, during the 28 days after vaccination regardless of relatedness. Events reported by more than 5.6% of subjects in any group are reported by MedDRA Preferred Term. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: Non-serious AEs are collected through 28 days after vaccination. Serious AEs are collected through 180 days after vaccination.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal pain upper - Any severityAbdominal pain upper - SevereUpper respiratory tract infection - Any severityUpper respiratory tract infection - SevereDysgeusia - Any severityDysgeusia - SeverePharyngolaryngeal pain - Any severityPharyngolaryngeal pain - SevereRhinorrhoea - Any severityRhinorrhoea - SevereDizziness - Any severityDizziness - SevereDysphonia - Any severityDysphonia - SeverePostnasal drip - Any severityPostnasal drip - SevereDiarrhoea - Any severityDiarrhoea - Severe
IVV With 10M IFN003000101000202000
IVV With 1M IFN204020103020000000
IVV Without IFN003110200000000030

[back to top]

Serum Antibody Responses (Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) and Neutralization) to Influenza B at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at 14 days after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 14 days after immunization

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HAI - B/Malaysia/2506/2004 at Day 14Neutralization - B/Malaysia/2506/2004 at Day 14
IVV With 10M IFN88
IVV With 1M IFN119
IVV Without IFN1312

[back to top]

Antibody Responses in Nasal Secretions to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 28 Days After Intranasal Immunization

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at day 28 after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels. (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 28 days after immunization.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
IgG to A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 28IgA to A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 28IgG to A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 28IgA to A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 28
IVV With 10M IFN3164
IVV With 1M IFN1133
IVV Without IFN3343

[back to top]

Antibody Responses in Nasal Secretions to Influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 at 14 Days After Intranasal Immunization.

Number of subjects (frequency) responding with a four-fold or greater increase (magnitude) in titer at day 14 after immunization, relative to pre-immunization levels (NCT00436046)
Timeframe: 14 days after immunization.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
IgG to A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 14IgA to A/New Caledonia/20/99 at Day 14IgG to A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 14IgA to A/Wisconsin/67/2005 at Day 14
IVV With 10M IFN5146
IVV With 1M IFN3023
IVV Without IFN3231

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity

Time to first Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity or liver toxicity (lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMonths (Number)
10th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity20th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity10th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity20th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity10th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity20th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity10th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity20th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity10th percentile: ALT toxicity20th percentile: ALT toxicity
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)0.362.23NANA0.92NA2.967.00NANA

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- systolic and diastolic blood pressure was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mm*hg) (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)0.3-1.7

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Weight

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- weight was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

InterventionKilogram (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.6
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.4

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT Interval

Mean change from baseline in ECG parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT interval was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
PR IntervalRR IntervalQRS IntervalQT Interval
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)-0.00440.0643-0.00260.0109

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change in New T1 Gd+ Lesions From Baseline to Week 96

Mean change in new T1 Gd+ lesions from baseline to week 96 was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-1.0
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.3

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume From Baseline to Week 96

Mean change in T1 hypointense lesion volume from baseline to week 96 was reported. T1 Hypointense lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Interventionmillimeter cubic (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-481.8
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-263.0

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change in T2 Lesion Volume From Baseline to Week 96

Mean change in T2 lesion volume From baseline to Week 96 were reported. T2 lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Interventioncubic millimeters (mm^3) (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-2007.2
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-1224.6

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level to Week 96

Mean changes in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 96 was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Interventiongram per liter (g/L) (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-2.9
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-2.5

[back to top]

OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v 4.0) Hematological or Liver Toxicity

Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or 4 CTCAE v 4.0 toxicity on the following hematology and liver function parameters were reported: lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline (OLEP) up to Week 96

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 3 or 4 Lymphocyte toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Hemoglobin toxicityGrade 3 or 4 White Blood Cell toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Neutrophil toxicityGrade 3 or 4 CD4+ toxicityGrade 3 or 4 AST toxicityGrade 3 or 4 ALT toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Platelet toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Bilirubin toxicity
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)3.92.00.000.0014.00.000.000.000.00
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)48.90.004.36.466.00.000.000.000.00
Placebo, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)28.60.003.614.321.40.003.60.000.00

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percent Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Week 96

Brain volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain. Percent change in normalized brain volume from baseline to week 96 was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-1.01
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-1.42

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Qualifying Relapse-free

A qualifying relapse was defined as a 2-grade increase in 1 or more Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS) or a 1-grade increase in 2 or more KFS, excluding changes in bowel/bladder or cognition, in the absence of fever, lasting for >= 24 hours, and preceded by at least 30 days of clinical stability or improvement. Percentage of participants qualifying relapse-free were reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)75.0
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)52.1

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With no Active T1 Gd-Enhanced Lesions at Week 96

Percentage of participants with no active T1 Gd-enhanced lesions at week 96 were reported. Active T1 Gd-Enhanced lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Week 96

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)86.0
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)56.3

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With no Active T2 Lesions at Week 96

Percentage of participants with no active T2 lesions at week 96 were reported. Active T2 lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Week 96

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)56.2
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)29.2

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Infections and Infestations System Organ Class (SOC)

An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration.TEAEs were entered in infections and infestations SOC as per medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) version 11.0 (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)61.3
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)54.2

[back to top]

OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Infections and Infestations System Organ Class (SOC)

An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration.TEAEs were entered in infections and infestations SOC as per medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) version 11.0 (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline (OLEP) up to Week 96

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)38.3
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)21.4
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)11.5
Placebo, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)0

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions Per Participant Per Scan at Week 96

Mean number of T1 hypointense lesions per participant per scan at 96 weeks were reported. T1 hypointense lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Week 96

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.28
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.43

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Pulse Rate

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- Pulse Rate was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionbeats per minutes (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)4.7

[back to top]

OLE and Safety Follow-up Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline (OLEP) up to Week 96

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)221
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)370
Placebo, IFN-beta (Safety Follow up)00
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)191

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Time to Recovery From Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity

"Time to recovery from grade 3 or 4 hematological were reported: lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophils, white blood cells and hemoglobin. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. Recovery as Recovery from a Grade 3 or 4 toxicity is defined as a return to a Grade 0 or 1." (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionDays (Mean)
HemoglobinWhite Blood CellNeutrophilLymphocyte
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)19.5031.2741.17142.53

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Temperature

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- temperature was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

InterventionDegree celsius (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)-0.3

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Weight

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- weight was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

InterventionKilogram (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)-9.4

[back to top]

Double Blind Period and OLE Period: Time to 3-Month Sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression

EDSS progression is based on a standardized neurological exam and focuses on symptoms that commonly occur in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Overall scores ranges from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (death due to MS). A sustained progression on EDSS score was defined as an EDSS progression confirmed into two consecutive assessment. Time to sustained disability progression was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

,,,
InterventionDays (Number)
10th percentile20th percentile
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)244NA
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)87246
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)4840
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)850

[back to top]

Double Blind Period and OLE Period: Time to First Qualifying Relapse

A qualifying relapse was defined as a 2-grade increase in at least one, or a 1-grade increase in at least two, Kurtzke Functional Systems excluding bowel/bladder or cognition changes, in the absence of fever lasting more than or equal to 24 hours, and preceded by more than or equal to 30 days of clinical stability or improvement. Time to first qualifying relapse were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

,,,
InterventionDays (Number)
10th percentile20th percentile
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)239NA
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)2550
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)252481
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)1550

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT Interval

Mean change from baseline in ECG parameters- PR, RR, QRS and OT interval was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
PR IntervalRR IntervalQRS IntervalQT Interval
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.00010.03610.00280.0135
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.0033-0.02720.00430.0037

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Maximum Corrected QT Interval (QTc)

Criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG parameters: Maximum corrected QT interval (QTc) in range of 450 to less than 480 millisecond (msec). (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.4381
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.4361

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- systolic and diastolic blood pressure was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mm*hg) (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.6-0.6
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.0-2.2

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) to Week 96

Mean changes in ALT and AST from baseline to week 96 were reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
ALTAST
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-3.0-1.7
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)1.31.1

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Count, CD8+ Count, and CD19+ to Week 96

Mean changes CD4+ Count, CD8+ Count, and CD19+ from baseline to Week 96 were reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
InterventionCells per microliter (Mean)
CD4+CD8+CD19+
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-604.1-137.822.0
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)7.123.930.7

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Changes in Lymphocytes, White Blood Cells (WBC), Neutrophils and Platelets Values From Baseline to Week 96

Mean changes in lymphocytes, WBC, neutrophils and platelets from baseline to week 96 were reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
LymphocytesPlateletWBCNeutrophils
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.8-29.8-1.5-0.7
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.0-12.4-0.4-0.4

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions, Active Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions, and Time Constant 1 (T1) Gadolinium Enhanced (Gd+) Lesions Per Participant Per Scan

Number of CUA lesions, active T2 lesions, and T1 Gd+ lesions were measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Week 96

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
T1 Gd+ lesionsCUA lesionsT2 lesions
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.060.550.53
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.341.121.04

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)11912
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)365

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity

Time to first Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity or liver toxicity (lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMonths (Number)
10th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity20th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity10th percentile:Hemoglobin toxicity20th percentile:Hemoglobin toxicity10th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity20th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity10th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity20th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity10th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity20th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity10th percentile: AST toxicity20th percentile: AST toxicity10th percentile: ALT toxicity20th percentile: ALT toxicity
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)1.612.00NANA17.74NA12.55NA1.872.99NANANANA

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity

Time to first Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity or liver toxicity (lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMonths (Number)
10th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity20th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity10th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity20th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity10th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity20th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity10th percentile: ALT toxicity20th percentile: ALT toxicity
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)NANANANANANANANA

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Time to Recovery From Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity

"Time to recovery from grade 3 or 4 hematological were reported: lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophils, white blood cells and hemoglobin. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. Recovery as Recovery from a Grade 3 or 4 toxicity is defined as a return to a Grade 0 or 1." (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionDays (Mean)
NeutrophilLymphocyte
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)56.7528.00

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Maximum Corrected QT Interval (Qtc)

Criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG parameters: Maximum corrected QT interval (QTc) in range of 450 to less than 480 millisecond (msec). (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)0.4370
Placebo, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)0.4317

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Temperature

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- temperature was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

InterventionDegree celsius (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.1
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)-0.1

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- Heart Rate

Mean change from baseline in ECG parameters- Heart Rate was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionbeats per minutes (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)-4.889

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Annualized Qualifying Relapse Rate

A qualifying relapse was defined as a 2-grade increase in at least one, or a 1-grade increase in at least two, Kurtzke Functional Systems excluding bowel/bladder or cognition changes, in the absence of fever lasting more than or equal to 24 hours, and preceded by more than or equal to 30 days of clinical stability or improvement. The annualized relapse rate for each treatment group was the mean of the annualized relapse rates for all the participants in the group, calculated as the total number of confirmed relapses divided by the total number of days on study multiplied by 365.25. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.12
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.32

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- Heart Rate

Mean change from baseline in ECG parameters- Heart Rate was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Interventionbeats per minutes (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)-3.114
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)1.981

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs- Pulse Rate

Mean change from baseline in vital signs- Pulse Rate was reported. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Interventionbeats per minutes (Mean)
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)1.0
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)0.4

[back to top]

Open Label Extension Period: Time to First Grade 3 or 4 Hematological Toxicity or Liver Toxicity

Time to first Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity or liver toxicity (lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. 10th and 20th percentiles estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Due to the small number of events, estimates from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could only be derived for lower percentiles. The median (50th percentile) could not be estimated if less than 50% of the participants had an event during the time of the study. Accordingly, lower percentiles are presented according to the number of events observed. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionMonths (Number)
10th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity20th percentile: Lymphocytes toxicity10th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity20th percentile: White Blood Cell toxicity10th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity20th percentile: Neutrophil toxicity10th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity20th percentile: CD4+ count toxicity
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (OL Ext)0.301.64NANANANA0.920.99

[back to top]

Double Blind Period: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v 4.0) Hematological or Liver Toxicity

Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or 4 CTCAE v 4.0 toxicity on the following hematology and liver function parameters were reported: lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell, neutrophils, white blood cells, hemoglobin, Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Platelets and Bilirubin. According to CTCAE v 4.0: Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling and Grade 5=Death. (NCT00436826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 3 or 4 Lymphocyte toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Hemoglobin toxicityGrade 3 or 4 White Blood Cell toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Neutrophil toxicityGrade 3 or 4 CD4+ toxicityGrade 3 or 4 AST toxicityGrade 3 or 4 ALT toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Platelet toxicityGrade 3 or 4 Bilirubin toxicity
Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, IFN-beta (DB Period)63.712.4210.4812.1050.810.810.810.000.00
Placebo, IFN-beta (DB Period)2.080.000.002.082.080.002.080.000.00

[back to top]

Investigator Assessment Regarding Global Oral Changes.

"Number of subjects with improvement from baseline to week 24 in global oral health as rated by the attending investigator. Scale was subjective with 3 choices: improved, worsened, or unchanged." (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges9
Placebo Lozenges2

[back to top]

Total Surface Area of the Lips Covered by Warts

Number of subjects with a 75% or greater decrease from baseline to week 24 in total lip wart area (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges5
Placebo Lozenges0

[back to top]

Subject Questionnaire Regarding Global Oral Changes

"Number of subjects reporting change in global oral health from baseline to week 24 as better. Scale was subjective with 3 choices: better, worse, or unchanged." (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges14
Placebo Lozenges2

[back to top]

Investigator Assessment Regarding Changes in Warts

"Number of subjects with improvement in oral warts from baseline to week 24 as rated by the attending investigator. Scale was subjective with 3 choices: improved, worsened, or unchanged." (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges13
Placebo Lozenges5

[back to top]

Change in Total Oral Mucosal Area Covered by Warts.

Number of subjects with a 75% or greater decrease from baseline to week 24 in total oral wart area (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges11
Placebo Lozenges2

[back to top]

Subject Questionnaire Regarding Changes in Warts

"Number of subjects reporting change in oral warts from baseline to week 24 as better. Scale was subjective with 3 choices: better, worse, or unchanged." (NCT00454181)
Timeframe: 24 weeks, from baseline to the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IFN Lozenges18
Placebo Lozenges4

[back to top]

Liver Enzyme Elevations

"The variable Liver enzyme elevations will consist of a combination of MedDRA terms (Preferred Terms only) indicative for this condition." (NCT00459667)
Timeframe: 309 days

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
GGT increasedAST increasedALT increased
IFNB-1b 250 mcg1.21.41.7
IFNB-1b 250 mcg*3.93.94.4
IFNB-1b 500 mcg2.72.02.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Neutralizing Antibody Titer to IFNB-1b of Different Cut-off Values

Serum samples of about 8 mL for analysis of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon (IFN) beta-1b were drawn at Baseline, Week 26 and the EOS visit. (NCT00459667)
Timeframe: 309 days

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
NAbs titer, cut-off value 20 NU/mlNAbs titer, cut-off value 100 NU/mlNAbs titer, cut-off value 400 NU/ml
IFNB-1b 250 mcg21.712.46.1
IFNB-1b 250 mcg*16.62.50
IFNB-1b 500 mcg26.616.510.8

[back to top]

Flu-like-syndrome

"The variable Flu-like-syndrome will consist of a combination of MedDRA terms (Preferred Terms and Lower Level Terms) indicative for this condition." (NCT00459667)
Timeframe: 309 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IFNB-1b 500 mcg17.4
IFNB-1b 250 mcg15.8
IFNB-1b 250 mcg*31.1

[back to top]

Injection-site Reactions

"The variable Injection-site reactions will consist of a combination of MedDRA terms (Preferred Terms only) indicative for this condition." (NCT00459667)
Timeframe: 309 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IFNB-1b 500 mcg31.7
IFNB-1b 250 mcg26.2
IFNB-1b 250 mcg*31.7

[back to top]

Hematological Abnormalities

"The variable Hematological abnormalities will consist of a combination of MedDRA terms (Preferred Terms only) indicative for this condition." (NCT00459667)
Timeframe: 309 days

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
White blood cells decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedLymphocyte count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedHemoglobin decreased
IFNB-1b 250 mcg1.91.20.60.21.1
IFNB-1b 250 mcg*1.72.200.60
IFNB-1b 500 mcg0.50.51.50.71.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response as Measured by RECIST Criteria

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response = CR + PR (NCT00467077)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles of treatment, up to 2 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Gefitinib and PEG-IFNa Treatment2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT00467077)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gefitinib and PEG-IFNa Treatment13.6

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00467077)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, up to 5 years.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gefitinib and PEG-IFNa Treatment5.2

[back to top]

Six-month Progression-free Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (NCT00467077)
Timeframe: From the date treatment started until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Gefitinib and PEG-IFNa Treatment29

[back to top]

Toxicity as Measured by Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

Number of participants who discontinued the protocol due to adverse events. (NCT00470093)
Timeframe: Up to 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interleukin-6 and Interferon-α2

[back to top]

Response Rate as Assessed by Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response by Bladé Criteria.

Number of participants with partial or complete response by Bladé criteria where partial response is defined as a >= 50% decrease in serum paraprotein or 90% decrease in urinary light chains (for participants without measurable serum paraprotein). Complete response is defined as negative serum and urine immunofixation and a bone marrow aspirate with < 5% plasma cells. (NCT00470093)
Timeframe: Up to 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interleukin-6 and Interferon-α0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virological Responses (Groups A, B, C, D, E, and F)

"End of treatment response (ETR) was defined as Success if the HCV-RNA levels were <15 IU/mL at the end of treatment. Early virological response (EVR) was defined as >=2 log10 decrease in serum HCV RNA or undetectable serum HCV RNA (<15 IU/mL) at Week 12. Complete EVR was defined as Success, if the HCV-RNA levels were <15 IU/mL at Week 12. Partial EVR was defined as Success, if there was a >=2 log10 drop in HCV-RNA at Week 12 compared to baseline but with a level that was still >=15 IU/mL at that time point." (NCT00483938)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Groups C, D, E, and F), and end of treatment (Weeks 48, 72, 36, 48, 24, and 48 for Groups A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively)

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ETRComplete EVRPartial EVR
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group A)80.500
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group B)76.700
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group C)96.793.30
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group D)90.396.83.2
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group E)92.088.00
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group F)100.092.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (SVR) (Groups A and B)

SVR was defined as success if the participant had HCV RNA levels <15 IU/mL as measured by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan® HCV test at the 24-week untreated follow-up visit (HCV-RNA levels obtained at least 18 weeks after last dose of either pegylated-Interferon alfa-2a or ribavirin were considered if the 24-week untreated follow-up visit data were missing). Percentage of participants with SVR for Groups A and B was reported in this analysis. (NCT00483938)
Timeframe: At 24-week untreated follow-up visit (up to 72 weeks for Group A, up to 96 weeks for Group B)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group A)48.8
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group B)39.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With SVR (Groups C, D, E, and F)

SVR was defined as success if the participant had HCV RNA levels <15 IU/mL as measured by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan® HCV test at the 24-week untreated follow-up visit (HCV-RNA levels obtained at least 18 weeks after last dose of either pegylated-Interferon alfa-2a or ribavirin were considered if the 24-week untreated follow-up visit data were missing). Percentage of participants with SVR for Groups C, D, E, and F was reported in this analysis. (NCT00483938)
Timeframe: At 24-week untreated follow-up visit (up to 60, 72, 48, and 72 weeks for Groups C, D, E, and F, respectively)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group C)73.3
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group D)74.2
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group E)84.0
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin (Group F)84.0

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates

"ARR is obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occured during the treatment period divided by the sum of the treatment durations.~Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever - was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score or Functional System scores.~To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrollment and IFN-β dose level as covariates)." (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.260
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.280
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.109

[back to top]

Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease)

"Total lesion volume is the sum of the total volume of all T2-lesions and the total volume of all T1-hypointense post-gadolinium lesions measured through T2/proton density scan analysis and gadolinium-enhanced T1 scan analysis.~Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures [MMRM] on cubic root transformed volume data (treatment group, region of enrollment, IFN-β dose level, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value (cubic root transformed), and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors)." (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: baseline (before randomization) and 24 weeks

Interventionmililiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + IFN-β-0.001
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.002
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β-0.028

[back to top]

Cerebral MRI Assessment: Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)

"Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is obtained from the total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the study divided by the total number of scans performed during the study.~To account for the different number of scans among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable; log-transformed number of scans as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrollment, IFN-β dose level and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates)." (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionlesions per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.570
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.099
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.089

[back to top]

Cerebral MRI Assessment: Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan

Total volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is obtained from the sum of the volumes of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the study divided by the total number of scans performed during the study. (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmililiters per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.068
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.022
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.024

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic [PK]: Teriflunomide Plasma Concentration

Plasma concentrations of teriflunomide were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmicrograms/mililiter (μg/mL) (Mean)
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β21.437
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β47.761

[back to top]

Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)

"PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review.~Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows:~Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT] >3, 5, 10 or 20 Upper Normal Limit [ULN];~Aspartate aminotransferase [AST] >3, 5, 10 or 20 ULN;~Alkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULN;~Total Bilirubin [TB] >1.5 or 2 ULN;~ALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN;" (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake or up to the first intake in the extension study LTS6047, whichever occured first (40 weeks max)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT >3 ULN- ALT >5 ULNAST >3 ULN- AST >5 ULNAlkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULNTB >1.5 ULNALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN
Placebo + IFN-β2111100
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β2110000
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0000000

[back to top]

Overview of Adverse Events [AE]

AE are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake or up to the first intake in the extension study LTS6047, whichever occured first (40 weeks max)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE- serious AE- AE leading to death- AE leading to study drug discontinuation
Placebo + IFN-β35101
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β32001
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β33201

[back to top]

Overview of AE With Potential Risk of Occurrence

"AE with potential risk of occurrence were defined as follows:~Hepatic disorders;~Immune effects, mainly effects on bone marrow and infection;~Pancreatic disorders;~Malignancy;~Skin disorders, mainly Hair loss and Hair thinning;~Pulmonary disorders;~Hypertension;~Peripheral neuropathy;~Psychiatric disorders;~Hypersensitivity." (NCT00489489)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake or up to the first intake in the extension study LTS6047, whichever occured first (40 weeks max)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE with potential risk of occurence- Hepatic disorder AE- Pancreatic disorder AE- Pulmonary disorder AE- Immune effects related AE- Hair loss / Hair thinning AE- Hypertension-related AE- Peripheral neuropathy AE- Hypersensitivity AE- Malignancy AE- Psychiatric disorder AE
Placebo + IFN-β2455013014500
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β26117019343300
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β2582018301300

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Histologic Response(HR)

Number of participants with histologic response (HR): number of patients who had improvement of as least 2 scores at the end of follow-up liver biopsy compared to baseline liver biopsy by Ishak scoring system (the sum of Ishak necroinflammation score (0-18) and Ishak fibrosis score (0-6); the higher the total scores, the severer the histologic changes) (NCT00491179)
Timeframe: 1.5 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin for 48 Weeks (Genotype 1)11
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin for 24 Weeks (Genotype 2)6

[back to top]

1.Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 2.Number of Participants Who Droppoed Out of the Study Prematurely Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

"Number of participants with sustained virologic response (SVR): number of patients with undetectable HCV RNA 6 months off therapy by real-time PCR test (Cobas TaqMan HCV Test v2.0, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany, limit of detection < 25 IU/mL)~Number of participants who droppoed out of the study prematurely due to adverse events (AEs): number of patients who prematurely withdrew from the study due to any adverse events" (NCT00491179)
Timeframe: 1.5 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sustained virologic response (SVR)Drop-out
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin for 24 Weeks (Genotype 2)82
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin for 48 Weeks (Genotype 1)137

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate

(NCT00491244)
Timeframe: 1.5 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Peginterferon and Ribavirin130
Peginterferon72

[back to top] [back to top]

Sustained Virological Response (PCR 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA in serum at the end of follow-up (24 weeks after end of therapy) according to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. (NCT00493805)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks following 48 or 72 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Non Interventional Arm HOMA IR <= 21
Interventional Arm HOMA IR > 23

[back to top]

Early Virological Response in Participants With and Without Insulin Resistance

Early Virological Response (EVR) defined as HCV PCR at Week 12 either negative or at least 2 log units less than baseline in participants with and without insulin resistance. (NCT00493805)
Timeframe: At Week 12 (after start of therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Non Interventional Arm HOMA IR <= 210
Interventional Arm HOMA IR > 224

[back to top]

Sustained Biochemical Response

Sustained biochemical response (SBR): alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (NCT00495131)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (24 Weeks)75
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (48 Weeks)107

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response

Undetectable HCV RNA 6 months off therapy (NCT00495131)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (24 Weeks)87
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (48 Weeks)117

[back to top] [back to top]

Histologic Response

Histologic response: improvement of at least 2 grade of scores by Ishak liver histologic classification by end of follow up liver biopsy to baseline liver biopsy (NCT00495131)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (24 Weeks)71
Peginterferon and Ribavirin (48 Weeks)97

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Response

Per World Health Organization (WHO) Tumor Response: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Progressive Disease (PD). CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR as > = 30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions with reference baseline sum longest dimensions and if CA 125 levels declined by >50%, provided target lesion size did not increase by >20% on imaging, and PD as >20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as references smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or > new lesions. (NCT00501644)
Timeframe: Follow up CT scans after every 3 courses of treatment and following completion of all treatments.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive Disease
Chemoimmunotherapy92124

[back to top]

MRI Parameter- Percent Brain Volume Change for 2 Years

Baseline MRI is compared to MRI images collected during subsequent timepoints. The percent brain volume change is measured using SIENAX (Structural Image Evaluation using Normalization of Atrophy-X) (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12, Month-18 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole-0.862
Placebo-0.49

[back to top]

Changes in Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)

Baseline SDMT data were compared to SDMT data collected during the timepoints. A simple substitution task, the SDMT gives the examinee 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as a measure for screening cognitive impairment. The total score is the total number of correctly completed boxes in the time allowed. The test score range is from 0(worst outcome) to 110 (best outcome). (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12, Month-18 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole0.342
Placebo0.417

[back to top]

Changes in Normalized Grey Matter Volume

The baseline data of grey matter volume obtained from the MRI images is compared to data obtained at time points using SIENA (Structural Image Evaluation using Normalization of Atrophy) and SIENAX (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole-14.369
Placebo-18.444

[back to top]

Changes in MS Functional Composite (MSFC)

Baseline MSFC data is compared to MSFC data collected during the timepoints. The MSFC is a three-part, standardized, quantitative, assessment instrument that measures the clinical dimensions of leg function, arm/hand function and cognitive function and the components include Timed 25-Foot walk, 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12, Month-18 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole0.041
Placebo0.052

[back to top]

Changes in Normalized White Matter Volumes (nWMV)

The baseline data of white matter volume obtained from the MRI images is compared to data obtained at time points using SIENA (Structural Image Evaluation using Normalization of Atrophy) and SIENAX (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12, Month-18 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole-1.75
Placebo-9.69

[back to top]

Changes in Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (RNFL)

Baseline RNFL data is compared to the RNFL data collected during the timepoint, and the changes in RNFL is measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). (NCT00501943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month-3, Month-6, Month-12, Month-18 and Month-24

Interventionpercent change per year (Mean)
Riluzole-4.670
Placebo-1.839

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP defined as the time from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression in days. Response evaluation by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) done following 2 cycles and 3 cycles. Progression is defined, using RECIST, as a measurable increase in the smallest dimension of any target or non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, since baseline. (NCT00505635)
Timeframe: Following two 21 day cycles until disease progression

Interventiondays (Geometric Mean)
Biochemotherapy With Temozolomide93.2

[back to top]

PFS - Time to Event

PFS was defined as the time in days from the date of treatment start to the date of first documented disease progression or death. Disease progression was evaluated according to RECIST using CT scans (preferred method), MRI scans, X-ray, bone scans, or clinical examination. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (NCT00520403)
Timeframe: Days 0, 91, 182, 273, 365, 456, and 547

Interventiondays (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN/Vinblastine274

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Disease progression was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) using computed tomography (CT) scans (preferred method), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, X-ray, bone scans, or clinical examination. (NCT00520403)
Timeframe: Days 0, 91, 182, 273, 365, 456, and 547

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + IFN/Vinblastine66.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete remission (CR) or confirmed partial remission (PR) according to RECIST. (NCT00520403)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycles 3, 6, 9, 13, and 17

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 9 (n=14)Week 18 (n=16)Week 27 (n=16)Week 39 (n=16)Week 51 (n=16)
Bevacizumab + IFN/Vinblastine21.431.337.531.331.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the duration from treatment start to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last contact for surviving participants and missing data points. (NCT00520403)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to disease progression or death (up to Week 102)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN/VinblastineNA

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate

Relapse was defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination, attributable to multiple sclerosis that lasted for at least 48 hours, that were present at normal body temperature, and that were preceded by at least 30 days of clinical stability. Annualized relapse rate was estimated through negative binomial regression with robust variance estimation and covariate adjustment for geographic region using observed number of relapses as dependent variable, the log total amount of follow-up from date of first study treatment for each participant as an offset variable, and treatment group and geographic region as model covariates. (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionrelapses per participant per year (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.39
Alemtuzumab0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Year 2

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from value at Year 2. (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.2
Alemtuzumab-0.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Constant 2 (MRI-T2) Hyperintense Lesion Volume at Year 2

Percent change in MS lesion volume as measured by MRI-T2 scan was calculated from MRI-T2-weighted scans as the following: (lesion volume at 2 years - lesion volume at Baseline)*100/ (lesion volume at Baseline). (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-6.68
Alemtuzumab-10.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at Year 2

Participants were considered relapse free at Year 2 if they did not experience a relapse from the date of first study treatment to study completion at 24 months. Percentage of participants who were relapse free at Year 2, estimated using the KM method, was reported. (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Year 2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a58.69
Alemtuzumab77.59

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). As measured by EDSS score, SAD was defined as increase of at least 1.5 points for participants with Baseline score of 0 and increase of at least 1.0 point for participants with a Baseline score of 1.0 or more; and the increase persisted for at least next 2 scheduled assessments, that is, 6 consecutive months. Onset date of SAD was date of first EDSS assessment that began 6 month consecutive period of SAD. Participants who did not reach SAD endpoint were censored at their last visit. Percentage of participants with SAD, estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, was reported. (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with SAD (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a11.12
Alemtuzumab8.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Year 2

MSFC is a multidimensional measure consisting of quantitative tests of ambulation (Timed 25-Foot Walk), manual dexterity (9-Hole Peg Test; 9HPT), and cognitive function (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test; PASAT). The MSFC score was calculated as the mean of the Z-scores of the 3 components. A Z-score was calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference population from the test result, then dividing by the standard deviation of the reference population. Higher Z-scores reflected better neurological function and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. An increase in score indicated an improvement (Z-score range: -3 to +3). Acquisition of disability was measured by change from Baseline in MSFC score at Year 2. (NCT00530348)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Baseline (n=186, 375)Change at Year 2 (n=172, 362)
Alemtuzumab-0.020.15
Interferon Beta-1a0.050.07

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Other21
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week777
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week313

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With End of Treatment Response

Subjects were considered to have an end of treatment response if they completed the assigned treatment regimen and had undetectable HCV RNA at end of treatment or prematurely discontinued the assigned treatment regimen and had undetectable HCV RNA at the time of discontinuation. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: End of treatment (up to Week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week72.8
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week64.7
Other100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 48 After Completion of Treatment Among Subjects Who Completed Assigned Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: 48 weeks after completion of treatment (up to Week 96)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week83.1
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week70.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24 After the Completion of Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the completion of treatment (up to Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week60.5
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week52.9
Other100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Prior Relapsers With Undetectable HCV RNA

Prior relapsers: subjects who had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment in parent study but reverted to detectable levels of HCV RNA after stopping treatment in parent study were categorized as prior relapsers. Percentage of prior relapsers with undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after the completion of treatment in this study were presented. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of detection was 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the completion of treatment (up to Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Week96.0
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Week100.0
Other100.0

[back to top]

Cross Tabulation of Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR) and Sustained Viral Response (SVR) in With Prior Response

Cross tabulation of number of subjects with eRVR/SVR status in present study was presented with respect to prior response status of subjects in parent studies. eRVR=undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 and Week 12, SVR=undetectable HCV RNA at end of treatment (EOT) and at 24 weeks after last dose of study treatment without any confirmed detectable HCV RNA in between. Prior response=subjects were categorized into following categories based on their viral response in the parent study: Null Response (less than [<] 1-log10 decrease in HCV RNA at Week 4 or <2-log10 decrease in HCV RNA at Week 12), Partial Response (greater than [>] 2-log10 decrease in HCV RNA at Week 12, but detectable HCV RNA at Week 24), Viral Breakthrough (detectable HCV RNA during treatment after achieving undetectable HCV RNA), Relapse (undetectable HCV RNA at EOT but detectable HCV RNA during viral follow-up). Plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay; lower limit of detection=10 IU/mL. (NCT00535847)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 72

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Prior Null ResponsePrior Partial ResponsePrior Viral BreakthroughPrior Relapse
Achieved eRVR/Achieved SVR1215624
Achieved eRVR/Did Not Achieve SVR5700
Did Not Achieve eRVR/Achieved SVR7104
Did Not Achieve eRVR/Did Not Achieve SVR27621

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biochemical Response

Biochemical response was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks7563
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks8680
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks103103

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Combined Response

Combined response was defined as HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL and HBe seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks1118
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks1123
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks2345

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HBV-DNA < 200 IU/mL

HBV-DNA was tested by assay of Roche Cobas Taqman (the test lowest limit is 6 IU/mL) (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks1012
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks1412
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks2122

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HBV-DNA Undetectable

Undetectable HBV-DNA was defined as having a level <6 IU/mL by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks44
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks33
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks88

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss

HBeAg Loss was tested by assay of Abbott MEIA (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: Up to Treatment Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks31
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks28
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen (HBe or HBeAg) Loss

HBeAg Loss was tested by Abbott Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay (MEIA) (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks39
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks40
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Liver Biopsy Score

"Method for biopsy scoring was Knodell Scoring System (Histology Activity Index-HAI Score System):~Score I (periportal +/- bridging necrosis): 0 (none) to 10 (multilobular necrosis).~Score II (Intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis): 0 (none) to 4 (Marked [involvement of >2/3 of lobules or nodules]).~Score III (portal inflammation): 0 (none) to 4 (Marked [dense packing of~inflammatory cells in >2/3 of portal tracts]).~Score IV (fibrosis): 0 (none) to 4 (cirrhosis)." (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks after end of treatment

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks8.0-1.1
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks8.4-1.7
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks8.2-1.6

[back to top]

HBe Seroconversion

HBe seroconversion was defined as HBeAg Loss and Anti-HBeAg Positive. These were tested by assay of Abbott MEIA. (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks3138
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks2736
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks4067

[back to top]

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBs) Seroconversion

HBs seroconversion was defined as having HBsAg Loss and Anti-HBs Positive (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks00
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks00
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks12

[back to top]

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss

HBsAg Loss was tested by assay of Abbott MEIA (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks11
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks11
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus - Deoxyriboncleic Acid (HBV-DNA) <20,000 IU/mL

"HBV-DNA was tested by assay of Roche Cobas Taqman (the test~lowest limit is 6 IU/mL)" (NCT00536263)
Timeframe: End of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EOT24 weeks after EOT
PEG 1.0 mcg/kg Weekly (QW) * 24 Weeks4644
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 24 Weeks6147
PEG 1.5 mcg/kg QW * 48 Weeks7675

[back to top]

Volume of Central Compartment (Vc) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B

"Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegylated ɑ-2b included only Stratum A patients who had PK studies performed.~Samples were analyzed for pegylated interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM." (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 24, 96 and 168 hours after dose during weeks 5 and 28

Interventionml/kg (Median)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b772

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Child Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v4.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. PedsQL 4.0 healthy sample normative mean ± SD for child report = 83.0 ± 14.8. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Pretherapy90.3
Week 293.1
Week 472.8
Week 879.2
Week 1268.1
End of Therapy65.6

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Parent Quality of Life Assessments (Stratum A)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Quality of Live Inventory (PedsQL v4.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. PedsQL 4.0 healthy sample normative mean ± SD for parent report = 87.6 ± 12.3. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pretherapy70.3
Week 271.8
Week 474.4
Week 879.1
Week 1279.0
Week 2482.2
End of Therapy87.5
6 Months After End of Therapy86.0
12 Months After End of Therapy87.3

[back to top]

Median Steady State Trough Concentration of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B

"The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegylated ɑ-2b included only patients within Stratum A who had PK studies performed.~Samples were analyzed for pegylated interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM." (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 24, 96 and 168 hours after dose during weeks 5 and 28

Interventionpcg/ml (Median)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b52.8

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experience Toxicity at or Above the Target Toxicity for Strata B1 and B2

"The objective was to assess the safety of temozolomide administered in combination with peginterferon a-2b in Stratum B participants.~Accrual was suspended any time during therapy if 2 or more of 6, 4 or more of 12, 6 or more of 18, 8 or more of 24, 10 or more of 30 participants experienced target toxicity defined as:~Grade 4 non-hematologic (non-hem) toxicity that does not resolve to ≤grade 1 within 2 weeks from the time next dose is due and is determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 non-hem toxicity that is NOT constitutional symptoms (fever, chills, fatigue and/or pain)~Grade 3 elevations in creatinine or BUN that are determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 cardiopulmonary toxicity that is determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 mood alteration (suicidal ideation; danger to self or others)" (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Temozolomide/Peginterferon ɑ-2b With Measureable Disease0
Temozolomide/Peginterferon ɑ-2b Without Measureable Disease0

[back to top]

Probability of Event-free Survival (EFS) of Stratum A Participants

The probability of EFS was estimated as time to first event (relapse, death or second malignancy). As of April 2016, 21 out of 23 participants had no events. The EFS rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: 3 years from diagnosis

Interventionprobability (Number)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b0.913

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Parent Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v3.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 273.2
Week 475.1
Week 881.4
Week 1278.7
Week 2481.6
End of Therapy85.6
6 Months After End of Therapy85.0
12 Months After End of Therapy89.1

[back to top]

Systemic Clearance (CL) of Interferon ɑ-2B

Samples were analyzed for interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postinfusion

Interventionl/hr/m^2 (Median)
Interferon ɑ-2b15.3

[back to top]

Apparent Clearance (CL) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B

"Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegylated ɑ-2b included only Stratum A patients who had PK studies performed.~Samples were analyzed for pegylated interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM." (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 24, 96 and 168 hours after dose during weeks 5 and 28

Interventionml/hr/kg (Median)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b19.8

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Interferon ɑ-2b

Samples were analyzed for interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM. AUC is given as Time 0 to infinity. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postinfusion

Interventionpcg * hr/ml (Median)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b5026

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B

"Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegylated ɑ-2b included only Stratum A patients who had PK studies performed.~Samples were analyzed for pegylated interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM. AUC is given as Time 0 through infinity." (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 24, 96 and 168 hours after dose during weeks 5 and 28

Interventionpcg * hr/ml (Median)
Week 5 - First Dose50556
Week 28 - Steady State48480

[back to top]

ɑ Half Life of Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2B

"Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegylated ɑ-2b included only Stratum A patients who had PK studies performed.~Samples were analyzed for pegylated interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM." (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 24, 96 and 168 hours after dose during weeks 5 and 28

Interventionhours (Median)
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b24.8

[back to top]

BASC-2 Psychological Assessment (Stratum A)

The Behavioral Assessment System for Children, 2nd Edition (BASC-2) was administered to parents, assessing for any effects on behavior or mood in children undergoing study therapy. The behavior system index (BSI) T-score (range 0-100) is reported for the BASC-2 assessment. Higher scores reflect greater behavioral problems. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy, Week 4, Week 24, End of Therapy, and 6 Months Post End of Therapy

InterventionT score (Mean)
Pretherapy44.9
Week 445.9
Week 2444.2
End of Therapy47.2
6 Months After End of Therapy42.3

[back to top]

BRIEF Psychological Assessment (Stratum A)

The Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) was administered to parents, assessing for any effects on behavior or mood in children undergoing study therapy. The global executive composite (GEC) T-score (range 0-100) is reported for the BRIEF assessment. Higher scores reflect poorer executive function. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy, Week 4, Week 24, End of Therapy, and 6 Months Post End of Therapy

InterventionT score (Mean)
Pretherapy47.9
Week 450.8
Week 2448.6
End of Therapy47.6
6 Months After End of Therapy42.6

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Child Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v3.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 271.1
Week 476.1
Week 879.2
Week 1278.5
Week 2477.1
End of Therapy77.0
6 Months After End of Therapy83.7
12 Months After End of Therapy85.4

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Child Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v3.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Week 292.8
Week 490.1
Week 893.2
Week 1279.6
End of Therapy67.4

[back to top]

Volume of Central Compartment (Vc) of Interferon ɑ-2b

Samples were analyzed for interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postinfusion

Interventionl/m^2 (Median)
Interferon ɑ-2b25.1

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 3.0 Scores for Parent Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum B)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v3.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Week 267.7
Week 471.4

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Child Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments (Stratum A)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL v4.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. PedsQL 4.0 healthy sample normative mean ± SD for child report = 83.0 ± 14.8. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pretherapy75.5
Week 271.6
Week 477.2
Week 879.3
Week 1277.8
Week 2480.6
End of Therapy80.4
6 Months After End of Therapy87.5
12 Months After End of Therapy91.0

[back to top]

Mean Total PedsQL 4.0 Scores for Parent Quality of Life Assessments (Stratum B)

QoL assessments were completed using Pediatrics Quality of Live Inventory (PedsQL v4.0). Scale range is 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. PedsQL 4.0 healthy sample normative mean ± SD for parent report = 87.6 ± 12.3. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Pretherapy; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24; and End of therapy at 6 months and 12 months post

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Pretherapy77.6
Week 272.2
Week 489.1

[back to top]

Half-Life of Interferon ɑ-2b

Samples were analyzed for interferon ɑ-2b concentrations by using the VeriKine Human Interferon Alpha ELISA Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, and concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear-mixed effects modeling as implemented in NONMEM. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: Before first dose, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postinfusion

Interventionhours (Median)
ɑ half-lifeß half-life
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-Pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b0.714.7

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experience Toxicity at or Above the Target Toxicity for Stratum A Patients

"The objective was to study the feasibility and safety of administering peginterferon a-2b weekly for 48 weeks following the initial induction phase to Stratum A participants.~Accrual was suspended during the 48-week course if 2 or more of 6, 4 or more of 12, 6 or more of 18, 8 or more of 24, 10 or more of 30 participants experienced target toxicity defined as:~Grade 4 non-hematologic (non-hem) toxicity that does not resolve to ≤grade 1 within 2 weeks from the time next dose is due and is determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 non-hem toxicity that is NOT constitutional symptoms (fever, chills, fatigue and/or pain)~Grade 3 elevations in creatinine or BUN that are determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 cardiopulmonary toxicity that is determined to be probably or definitely related to protocol therapy~Grade 4 mood alteration (suicidal ideation; danger to self or others)" (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 4 non-hem toxicityGrade 4 non-hem/NOT constitutionalGrade 3 elevations in creatinine or BUNGrade 4 cardiopulmonary toxicityGrade 4 mood alteration
Peginterferon ɑ-2b/Non-pegylated Interferon ɑ-2b20001

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rate

Tumor response rate of stratum B1 participants was evaluated after 1 treatment course of temozolomide plus peginterferon ɑ-2b. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) confirmed with repeated scan at least 4 weeks apart following completion of course 1 therapy. CR defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions with no new lesions detected. If available, no disease must be detected by immunocytology or serum tumor markers. PR defined as at least 30% decrease in disease measurement compared to disease measurement at study entry with no new lesions detected. Progressive disease (PD) defined as at least 20% increase in the disease measurement compared to the smallest disease measurement recorded since start of treatment, or appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD compared to smallest disease measurement since start of treatment. (NCT00539591)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressive DiseaseClinical Remission
Stratum B120

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate

Relapse was defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination, attributable to multiple sclerosis that lasted for at least 48 hours, that were present at normal body temperature, and that were preceded by at least 30 days of clinical stability. Annualized relapse rate was estimated through negative binomial regression with robust variance estimation and covariate adjustment for geographic region using observed number of relapses as dependent variable, the log total amount of follow-up from date of first study treatment for each participant as an offset variable, and treatment group and geographic region as model covariates. (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionrelapses per participant per year (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.52
Alemtuzumab 12 mg0.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Year 2

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from value at Year 2. (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a0.21
Alemtuzumab 12 mg-0.20

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Constant 2 (MRI-T2) Hyperintense Lesion Volume at Year 2

Percent change in MS lesion volume as measured by MRI-T2 scan was calculated from MRI-T2-weighted scans as the following: (lesion volume at 2 years - lesion volume at Baseline)*100/ (lesion volume at Baseline). (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a2.41
Alemtuzumab 12 mg-1.12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Relapse Free at Year 2

Participants were considered relapse free at Year 2 if they did not experience a relapse from the date of first study treatment to study completion at 24 months. Percentage of participants who were relapse free at Year 2, estimated using the KM method, was reported. (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Year 2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a46.70
Alemtuzumab 12 mg65.38

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Accumulation of Disability (SAD)

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). As measured by EDSS score, SAD was defined as increase of at least 1.5 points for participants with Baseline score of 0 and increase of at least 1.0 point for participants with a Baseline score of 1.0 or more; and the increase persisted for at least the next 2 scheduled assessments, that is, 6 consecutive months. The onset date of SAD was date of first EDSS assessment that began 6 month consecutive period of SAD. Participants who did not reach SAD endpoint were censored at their last visit. Percentage of participants with SAD, estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, was reported. (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a21.13
Alemtuzumab 12 mg12.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Year 2

MSFC is a multidimensional measure consisting of quantitative tests of ambulation (Timed 25-Foot Walk), manual dexterity (9-Hole Peg Test; 9HPT), and cognitive function (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test; PASAT). The MSFC score was calculated as the mean of the Z-scores of the 3 components. A Z-score was calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference population from the test result, then dividing by the standard deviation of the reference population. Higher Z-scores reflected better neurological function and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. An increase in score indicated an improvement (Z-score range: -3 to +3). Acquisition of disability was measured by change from Baseline in MSFC score at Year 2. (NCT00548405)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 2

,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Baseline (n=198, 423)Change at Year 2 (n=169, 399)
Alemtuzumab 12 mg0.020.09
Interferon Beta-1a-0.03-0.04

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 6 Months (Evaluate Overall Responses; Perform Lab Experiments to Test Hypothesis That Exposure to Interferon-alpha and GM-CSF Up-regulates Co-stimulatory Molecule Expression on Relapsed Acute Leukemia Cells)

(NCT00548847)
Timeframe: 6 months after cytokine treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
GM-CSF, Interferon-α-2b2

[back to top]

Efficacy of GM-CSF and Pegylated Interferon-alpha 2b When Administered to Patients With AML, ALL, Blast Phase CML, and MDS Relapse After Allogeneic Transplantation, Defined as Progression-free Survival of > 33% at 3 Months

Efficacy is defined as progression-free survival of > 33% at 3 months. This is based on our retrospective data on 10% 3 month survival for relapsed patients. Progression is defined an an increase in blasts in blood or marrow by 50% compared to baseline with at least 20% of all cells being blasts at the time of assessment. (NCT00548847)
Timeframe: 3 months after cytokine treatment

Interventionpercentage of progression-free patients (Number)
GM-CSF, Interferon-α-2b13

[back to top]

Central Review-based Progression-Free Survival

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first documentation of progression based on Central Radiological Review of the appropriate CT or MRI scans, or symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e)), or development of new lesions or disease not identified on CT or MRI, or death due to any cause. Patients who have a local assessment of progression based on imaging, but for whom central review does not concur, will be censored at the last Central Radiological Review date, unless subsequent scans or documentation of symptomatic deterioration provides evidence of progression. Patients last known not to have progressed are censored at the date of last contact. Patients with incomplete Central Radiological Review are censored at the date of last Central Radiological Review if patient has not progressed prior to that time. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab16.6
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b15.4

[back to top]

Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete Response and Partial Response)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0): Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease, and no new lesions; Partial Response (PR) is greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions, no unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Confirmed response is two or more objective statuses of CR a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Partial response is two or more objective statuses of PR or better a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Unconfirmed CR is one objective status of CR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR or PR. Unconfirmed PR is one objective status of PR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR, PR or unconfirmed CR. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseUnconfirmed Complete ResponseUnconfirmed Partial ResponseStable/No ResposneIncreasing DiseaseSymptomatic DeteriorationAssessment Inadequate
Octreotide, Bevacizumab2200713520016
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b081613730317

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab35.2
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b47.3

[back to top]

Local Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessed)

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first documentation of progression [per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) as defined in Section 10.2d] or symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e), or death due to any cause. Patients last known not to have progressed are censored at date of last contact. Progression (Section 10.2d) includes one or more of the following: 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed using the same techniques as baseline; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician; appearance of new lesion/site; or death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration. Symptomatic deterioration (Section 10.2e) is global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab15.4
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b10.6

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first observation of progressive disease (as defined in Section 10.2d), death due to any cause, symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e), or discontinuation of treatment. This has been calculated using Central-Review based progression events. Patients last known not to have failed treatment are censored at date last known not to have failed. Patients with incomplete Central Radiological Review are censored at the date of last Central Radiological Review if patient has not failed treatment prior to that time. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab9.9
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b5.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival (10 Years) by Treatment

Overall Survival is the time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up within 10 years. (NCT00577993)
Timeframe: 10 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)-Rituximab59
Rituximab- Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (10 Years) by Treatment

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00577993)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)-Rituximab59
Rituximab- Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)58

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response (SVR)

Sustained viral response was defined as having undetectable HCV RNA at EOT (Week 48/50 or early discontinuation) and no confirmed detectable HCV RNA levels between EOT and 12 weeks (SVR12) and 24 weeks (SVR24) after the last dose of study medication. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Week 12 and 24 after the last dose of study medication

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SVR12SVR24
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin62.562.5
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin75.062.5
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin50.050.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Viral Response (Undetectable HCV RNA)

Viral response was either defined as having undetectable HCV RNA (that is, no HCV RNA was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 25 IU/mL HCV RNA from Day 15 up to end of treatment (EOT), that is Week 48/50 or early discontinuation. In Week x/y, where, x represents time frame for Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin and Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin and; y represents time frame for Telaprevir and Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin treatment group. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Day 15 up to EOT (Week 48/50 or early discontinuation)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15 (n=7, 8, 8)Week 4/6 (n=7, 8, 8)Week 12/14 (n=7, 8, 7)Week 24/26 (n=6, 8, 8)Week 36/38 (n=6, 8, 5)Week 48/50 (n=4, 7, 5)EOT (n=8, 8, 8)
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin012.557.162.510010075.0
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin042.985.710010010087.5
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin12.537.575.087.575.085.775.0

[back to top]

Time to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Telaprevir

The tmax is the time to reach maximum observed serum concentration of telaprevir and then pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (reference) and pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (test). (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15

,
InterventionHours (Median)
tmax: Day 1 (n=8, 8)tmax: Day 15 (n=7, 7)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin4.022.92
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin4.003.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)

The AUC is a measure of the serum concentration-time curve, calculated by the lin-up/log-down method. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15

,
Interventionnanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
AUC : Day 1 (n=8, 7)AUC : Day 15 (n=7, 7)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin670217120
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin746723320

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough (Detectable HCV RNA)

Viral breakthrough was defined as having a confirmed increase greater than 1 log 10 in HCV RNA level from the lowest level reached, or a confirmed level of HCV RNA greater than 100 IU/mL in participants whose HCV RNA had previously become undetectable [less than 25 IU/mL]). In Week x/y, where, x represents time frame for Telaprevir+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin and Placebo+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin and y represents time frame for Telaprevir and then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin treatment group. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 12, Day 15, Week 24/26 and Week 36/38

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 8Day 12Day 15Week 24/26Week 36/38
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin00011
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin13555
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin00002

[back to top]

Average Steady-State Serum Concentration (Css,av) of Telaprevir

The Average steady-state serum concentration (Css,av) was calculated by AUC/τ at steady-state (τ=dosing interval) of telaprevir and then pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (reference) and telaprevir+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (test). (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin2141
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin2896

[back to top]

Median Time to First Viral Response (Undetectable HCV RNA)

Time to first viral response (Undetectable HCV RNA) is defined as the number of days since the start of study medication until first time negative HCV RNA level that is less than 25 IU/mL was detected. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48/50

InterventionDays (Median)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin93
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin85.50
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin128

[back to top]

Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Telaprevir on Day 15

The Cmin is the minimum serum concentration between 0 hour and τ (τ=dosing interval) of telaprevir and then pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (reference) and telaprevir+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (test). Cmin on Day 15 is reported here. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose on Day 15

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin1639
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin2100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse was defined as having confirmed detectable HCV RNA during the 24-week follow-up period in participants who had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT (Week 48/50 or early discontinuation). Participants who dropped out between 24-week follow-up after EOT were not evaluated for relapse. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Week 24 after EOT (Week 48/50 or early discontinuation)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin14.3
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin33.3
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin16.7

[back to top]

Pre-Dose Serum Concentration (C[0h]) of Telaprevir

The C(0h) is the pre-dose serum concentration of telaprevir and then pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (reference) and telaprevir+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (test). (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) at Day 15

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin1873
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin2806

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at Day 15

The plasma HCV RNA levels were used to assess the antiviral activity which included viral response as either undetectable HCV RNA (that is no HCV target was detected in the plasma sample) or less than 25 International unit per milliliter (IU/mL) of HCV RNA (that is Plasma sample contained HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification [LLOQ=25 IU/mL] of the viral load assay). Plasma HCV RNA levels were measured using the COBAS TaqMan HCV test Version 2.0. This assay used real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology. (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

,,
Interventionlog 10 IU/mL (Median)
HCV RNA levels: Baseline (n=8,8,8)HCV RNA levels: Change at Day 15 (n=7,8,8)
Placebo+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin5.88-1.58
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin5.83-0.77
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin6.16-4.32

[back to top]

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Telaprevir

The Cmax is the maximum observed serum concentration, which was measured at Day 1 and 15 for telaprevir and then pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (reference) and telaprevir+pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin (test). (NCT00580801)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15

,
InterventionNanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Cmax: Day 1 (n=8, 8)Cmax: Day 15 (n=7, 7)
Telaprevir and Then Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin15982733
Telaprevir+Pegylated-interferon-alfa-2a+Ribavirin17093669

[back to top]

HIV Viral Load < 400 Copies/ml

% of individuals maintaining viral suppression (VL < 400 copies/ml) as compared to the anticipated rate of viral suppression in individuals interrupting ART without interferon (9%) (NCT00594880)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegasys 180 mcg/Week40
Pegasys 90 mcg/Week50

[back to top]

HIV Viral Load < 48 Copies/ml

% of individuals maintaining VL < 48 copies/ml while on pegylated interferon alpha-2a treatment without ART (NCT00594880)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
180 mcg/Week10
90 mcg/Week30

[back to top]

HIV Viral Load < 400 Copies/ml

% of individuals maintaining viral suppression (VL < 400 copies/ml) as compared to the anticipated rate of viral suppression in individuals interrupting ART without interferon (9%) (NCT00594880)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of eligible participants (Number)
180 mcg/Week67
90 mcg/Week80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in General Health Status as Assessed by the Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
Avonex®-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.3
Laquinimod-0.6-0.1-1.4-0.9
Placebo-0.4-0.7-0.9-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in General Health Status as Assessed by the Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores

The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
Avonex®-0.10.00.20.2
Laquinimod0.1-0.1-0.30.1
Placebo-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume

Change in brain volume was derived from MRI scans obtained at baseline and at Month 24. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Placebo-0.53
Laquinimod-0.51
Avonex®-0.53

[back to top]

Accumulation of Physical Disability Measured by the Number of Participants With Confirmed Progression of EDSS

A confirmed progression of EDSS was defined as a 1 point increase from baseline on EDSS score if baseline EDSS was between 0 and 5.0, or a 0.5 point increase if baseline EDSS was 5.5, confirmed 3 months later. EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems with an overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis [MS]). Data is presented as distribution of confirmed progression (number of participants with confirmed progression of EDSS) sustained for 3 months. Progression could not be confirmed during a relapse. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo60
Laquinimod42
Avonex®47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Disability as Assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite is an instrument assessing disability that consists of 3 clinical assessments. The 3 are Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test which measures upper extremity (arm and hand) function, and PASAT (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) which is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. A Z-score is used to define a common metric from the 3 assessments that constitute the MSFC score. The study's population at baseline was used as reference population for the Z-score calculation. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean at baseline. Higher Z-scores correspond to an improved outcome. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Laquinimod-0.00
Avonex®-0.01

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses

A relapse was defined as the appearance of new neurological abnormalities or the reappearance of previously observed neurological abnormalities; lasting at least 48 hours and immediately preceded by an improved neurological state of ≥30 days from onset of previous relapse, accompanied by observed objective neurological changes (an increase of ≥0.5 in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, or an increase of 1 grade in the score of 2 or more of the 7 Functional Systems [FS], or an increase of 2 grades in the score of 1 FS as compared to the previous evaluation). Total number of confirmed relapses during the treatment period was divided by the sum of number of days on study in the treatment period and then multiplied by the number of days in the year to calculate the annualized relapse rate. Annualized relapse rate was derived from a baseline-adjusted negative binomial regression. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

Interventionrelapse per year (Mean)
Placebo0.344
Laquinimod0.283
Avonex®0.255

[back to top]

Cumulative Number of Enhancing Lesions on T1-Weighted Images

The cumulative number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions was calculated as the sum of the numbers of Gd-enhancing lesions observed on scans taken at Months 12 and 24. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

Interventionlesions (Mean)
Placebo2.70
Laquinimod2.58
Avonex®1.23

[back to top]

Cumulative Number of New or Enlarging Hypointense Lesions on Enhanced T1 Scans

The cumulative number of new or enlarging hypointense lesions was calculated as the sum of the numbers of new or enlarging hypointense lesions observed on scans taken at Months 12 and 24. (NCT00605215)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

Interventionlesions (Mean)
Placebo7.10
Laquinimod7.33
Avonex®5.91

[back to top]

EVR (Early Virologic Response)

Early Virologic Response (EVR) is a response measured by the reduction of virus in the blood after 12 weeks of treatment. (NCT00606086)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Peg-IFN/Ribavirin Plus GI-500579.4
Arm 2: Peg-IFN/Ribavirin or Peg-IFN/Ribavirin Plus GI-500578.5

[back to top]

Summary of Disease Progression in Study Participants, Intent-to-treat Population

Number of evaluable study participants who had died or experienced objective disease progression (no clinical objective response to treatment as evaluated by computed tomography [CT] scans or physical examination). (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 up to 35 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Progressed or died due to any causeDid not progress or die due to any cause
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine74
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b66

[back to top]

Summary of Cellular Immune Response to the Vaccination or Treatment (Percent Regulatory T-Cells Responses)

The immunogenicity of the treatment regimens was assessed by regulatory T-cell responses as assessed primarily by the multi-parametric intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

,
InterventionPercent Cell Count (Mean)
ScreeningCycle 1 Week 1Cycle 1 Week 7Cycle 2 Week 23Cycle 2 Week 32
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine2.73.32.93.34.0
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b3.42.33.13.82.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Vaccine-Induced Increase of CD8 T-Cell Positive Response by Antigen

The vaccine-induced increase of CD8 T-Cell positive response by antigen post-vaccination during the observation period compared to the screening values. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Screening: gp100 pool1Screening: gp100 pool2Screening: gp100 pool3Screening: gp100 pool4Screening: gp100 pool5Screening: gp100 pool6Screening: NYESO-1 pool 1Screening: NYESO-1 pool 2Screening: Mart1 poolScreening: Native 15mer poolScreening: 9mer pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool17 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool27 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool37 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool47 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool57 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool67 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: NYESO-1 pool 17 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: NYESO-1 pool 27 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: Mart1 pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: Native 15mer pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: 9mer pool
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine0000000000000001000000
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b0000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Vaccine-Induced Increase of CD4 T-Cell Positive Response by Antigen

The Vaccine-induced increase of CD4 T-Cell positive response by antigen post-vaccination during the observation period compared to the screening values. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Screening: gp100 pool1Screening: gp100 pool2Screening: gp100 pool3Screening: gp100 pool4Screening: gp100 pool5Screening: gp100 pool6Screening: NYESO-1 pool 1Screening: NYESO-1 pool 2Screening: Mart1 poolScreening: Native 15mer poolScreening: 9mer pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool17 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool27 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool37 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool47 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool57 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: gp100 pool67 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: NYESO-1 pool 17 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: NYESO-1 pool 27 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: Mart1 pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: Native 15mer pool7 Weeks post 1st Vaccination: 9mer pool
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine0000000000000001000000
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b0000000000010000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting a Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Events by Preferred Term

"Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) definitions:~Grade 3 is a severe adverse event; Grade 4 is a life-threatening or disabling adverse event." (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 12 months post last vaccination

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AnemiaLeukocytosisAbdominal Pain UpperAxillary PainChest DiscomfortChest PainInflammationPyrexiaSepsisSeptic ShockStaphylococcal BacteremiaAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) IncreasedAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) IncreasedGamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) IncreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedWhite Blood Cell Count DecreasedHypernatremiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHyponatremiaJoint Range of Motion DecreasedMetastatic Malignant MelanomaBrain EdemaCerebral HemorrhageEncephalopathyHeadacheHemiplegiaParaesthesiaPeripheral Sensory NeuropathySyncope VasovagalPolyuriaHypotension
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine01111110100001111000101111100011
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b10000001011311000111010000011100

[back to top]

Best Overall Objective Response as Number of Participants Responding in the Intent-to-treat Population

Objective response rate (ORR) is the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) Complete response = Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

,
InterventionParticpants (Number)
Participants with measurable disease at baselineComplete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Not Evaluable (NE)Progression (PD)
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine1102306
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b1101316

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival Time by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) Criteria in the Intent-to-treat Population

Progression-Free Survival was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor criteria from the computed tomography (CT) scans, as per-protocol (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 - up to 35 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine15.9
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b8.9

[back to top]

Best Overall Objective Response as Mean Duration of Response (Weeks) in the Intent-to-treat Population

Objective response rate (ORR) is the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) Complete response = Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

InterventionWeeks (Mean)
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine16.3
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b18.3

[back to top]

Best Overall Objective Response in the Intent-to-treat Population

Objective response rate (ORR) is the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) Complete response = Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00613509)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 32 weeks post 1st vaccination or treatment

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Study Group 1: ALVAC Melanoma Vaccine18.2
Study Group 2: Interferon Alpha-2b9.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE, can therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. All AE's were analyzed based on the principle of treatment emergence. An AE was regarded as treatment-emergent if it was not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared, or if it was present prior to receiving the first injection and subsequently worsened in severity. (NCT00616434)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a52
Placebo35

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response

Clinical response is defined as a decrease from baseline in the total Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%, accompanied by a decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of at least 1 point or an absolute subscore of 1 or less. Baseline was defined as the score collected during the screening period. The Mayo Score/Disease Activity Index (DAI) measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale, 0, 1, 2, or 3, with a higher score representing greater severity. In this study, the endoscopy subscore was expanded to a 5-point scale to increase sensitivity in this important dimension of the disease (0=normal/inactive disease, 4=deep ulceration). The Total Mayo Score can therefore range from 0 to13 points. (NCT00616434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a53
Placebo44

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease on Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) of ≥3 Points at Week 8

The SCCAI measures disease activity as defined by both participants and examiners and includes the following 13 items: general well-being, abdominal pain, bowel frequency, stool consistency, bleeding, anorexia, nausea or vomiting, abdominal tenderness, extra-intestinal complications (eye, mouth, joint, skin), temperature, sigmoidoscopic assessment, nocturnal bowel movements, and urgency of defecation. Scores range from 0 to 19 points, and scores <2.5 have been shown to correlate with Patient-Defined Remission, and a decrease of >1.5 points from Baseline correlates with Patient-Defined Significant Improvement. Baseline is defined as the mean of the screening and visit 1 scores. (NCT00616434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a64
Placebo46

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 72

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Week 72 (24 weeks after last dose for subjects with a planned treatment duration of 48 weeks and 48 weeks after last dose for subjects with planned treatment duration of 24 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week158
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week243
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week265

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 and at Week 12

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. eRVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at both Week 4 and Week 12. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week29
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week207
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week212

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving Rapid Viral Response (RVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA 4 Weeks After Starting Study Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 4 weeks after the start of study treatment. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week34
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week242
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week246

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment (up to Week 60)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week161
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week255
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week275

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA 24 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last actual dose of study treatment (up to Week 72)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week158
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week251
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week274

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: End of treatment (up to Week 48)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week229
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week295
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week314

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week146
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week277
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week283

[back to top]

Biochemical Response: Number of Subjects With Grade 3 and 4 Shifts From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels

Criteria for grading severity (toxicity) of ALT and AST: Grade 0 (<1.25*upper limit of normal [ULN]); Grade 1 (mild=1.25 to 2.5*ULN); Grade 2 (moderate=2.6 to 5.0*ULN); Grade 3 (severe= greater than 5.0 to 20.0*ULN); Grade 4 (life-threatening= greater than 20.0*ULN). Number of subjects with Grade 3 shift (from Grade 0, Grade 1 or Grade 2 baseline) and Grade 4 shift (from Grade 0, Grade 1, Grade 2 or Grade 3 baseline) are reported. If a subject experienced more than 1 severity grade shifts during post baseline assessments, the maximum severity grade shift was considered. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT Grade 3 toxicity grade shiftALT Grade 4 toxicity grade shiftAST Grade 3 toxicity grade shiftAST Grade 4 toxicity grade shift
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week120191
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week60100
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week5170

[back to top]

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Total Score

FSS was a 9-item questionnaire where each item was scored on a scale of 1 to 7 (higher scores indicated higher influence of fatigue). FSS total score was calculated as the average of individual items on the questionnaire and FSS total score ranged from 1 to 7, where higher score indicated higher influence of fatigue. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=343, 351, 346)Week 4 (n=334, 326, 329)Week 12 (n=329, 310, 312)Week 24 (n=317, 307, 304)Week 36 (n=296, 282, 297)Week 48 (n=286, 282, 294)Week 72 (n=296, 270, 289)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week3.04.14.44.34.14.02.9
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week3.04.54.84.33.33.12.6
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week3.24.44.44.33.43.02.6

[back to top]

Noninvasive Markers of Fibrosis: Number of Subjects With Improvement in FibroTest Analysis

FibroTest analysis was a biomarker analysis test used to generate a score that was correlated with the degree of liver damage. The FibroTest score was calculated from the results of a six-parameter blood test, combining six serum markers (alpha-2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin, and alanine transaminase). The FibroTest score (F score) may range from 0.00 (Grade F0) to 1.00 (Grade F4), where F0= no fibrosis and F4=cirrhosis. Results were presented separately for subjects who achieved SVR at 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment and those who did not achieve SVR at 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment. Improvement was defined as decrease of at least 1 grade relative to baseline. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment (up to Week 72)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR achieved (136, 180, 214)SVR not achieved (137, 53, 47)
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week3531
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week8412
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week5912

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR), Demonstrated by Achieving Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Treatment

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. Two results are reported: 1) Protocol defined SVR: undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment without any confirmed detectable HCV RNA between end of treatment visit (up to Week 48) and 24 weeks after last planned dose (up to Week 72); 2) SVR as per FDA guidance (snapshot analysis): undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment. Analysis was based only on the HCV RNA assessment in visit window (+/-2 weeks); if there were more than 1 assessment in the window, the last measurement was used. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment (up to Week 72)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR: Protocol DefinedSVR: FDA Guidance
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week158166
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week271285
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week250261

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week35424
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week36133
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week36231

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Viral Relapse Planned and Viral Relapse Actual

Viral relapse was defined as having detectable HCV RNA during antiviral follow-up. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. For viral relapse, 2 analyses were performed: planned and actual. The planned analyses was measured from the end of treatment (EOT) visit to 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment. The actual analyses was measured from the EOT visit to 24 weeks after the last actual dose of study treatment. (NCT00627926)
Timeframe: After last dose of study drug up to 24 week antiviral follow-up (up to Week 72)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Viral Relapse PlannedViral Relapse Actual
PBO 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 48 Week6464
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week2725
Telaprevir 8 Week, PBO 4 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV 24/48 Week2828

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Investigator-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by investigator imaging reviewers using RECIST criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa10.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Complete Response/Partial Response): Independent-Assessment

Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus27.0
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa27.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by independent imaging reviewers using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa9.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus25.8
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa25.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Volume of T2 Lesions on MRI Scans of the Brain at Week 24

Change from baseline in total volume of T2 lesions on MRI scans of the Brain at week 24 was reported. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
InterventionCubic Millimeter (mm^3) (Mean)
Baseline (n= 47, 51, 53, 49)Change at Week 24 (n= 43, 45, 46, 46)
Avonex13209.111040.06
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg13178.30-600.89
Ocrelizumab 600 mg13972.61-878.84
Placebo8950.84-112.31

[back to top]

Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions at Weeks

Total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions at weeks were reported. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 to Week 24

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Placebo8.7
Ocrelizumab 600 mg2.5
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg1.8
Avonex10.3

[back to top]

Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain

Mean of total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions observed on MRI scans of the brain at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24 was determined using average imputation method. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 24

InterventionLesion (Mean)
Placebo5.6
Ocrelizumab 600 mg0.6
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg0.2
Avonex6.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Remained Relapse Free at Week 24

Percentage of participants who remained relapse free at week 24 were reported. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo75.9
Ocrelizumab 600 mg85.5
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg87.3
Avonex77.8

[back to top]

Annualized Protocol Defined Relapse Rate at Week 24

Adjusted annualized relapse rate for geographical region. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionNumber of relapses (Number)
Placebo0.557
Ocrelizumab 600 mg0.127
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg0.213
Avonex0.364

[back to top]

Total Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Lesions Observed by MRI Scans of the Brain

Total number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions observed by MRI scans of the brain were reported. (NCT00676715)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 to Week 24

InterventionLesions (Mean)
Placebo5.1
Ocrelizumab 600 mg0.8
Ocrelizumab 1000 mg0.8
Avonex6.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0, as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe), Grade 4 (life-threatening), or Grade 5 (fatal). TEAEs were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period. Causal relationship of each TEAE to study treatment was evaluated by the investigator separately for HDI and KW2871. Regimen-limiting toxicity was defined as an HDI-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) that required more than 2 dose reductions of HDI during the induction phase or the first 4 weeks of the maintenance phase, or any KW2871- or regimen-related DLT. (NCT00679289)
Timeframe: From baseline through up to 17 months post-baseline

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEMaximum TEAE Severity Grade 1/2Maximum TEAE Severity Grade 3Maximum TEAE Severity Grade 4Maximum TEAE Severity Grade 5Any HDI-related TEAEAny KW2871-related TEAEAny SAEAny TEAE leading to withdrawal of HDI+KW2871Any TEAE leading to withdrawal of HDI onlyAny TEAE leading to withdrawal of KW2871 onlyRegimen-limiting toxicity
Cohort 1605106420000
Cohort 2612216511000
Cohort 3242201124773112

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) With 95% Confidence Intervals

PFS was calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented progression or death, whichever occurred first. PFS analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods for all patients combined and for patients in Cohort 3. Based on published results from Phase 3 randomized clinical trials in patients with metastatic melanoma at the time of study initiation, 2.5 months was estimated as a conservative (i.e., somewhat high) external standard of median PFS. The intent of this study was to improve this standard by ≥ 70% to a median PFS of ≥ 4.3 months for patients treated with KW2871 combined with HDI. If the therapeutic target of 4.3 months for median PFS represented the true underlying treatment effect of KW2871 plus HDI, then 23 patients would provide 80% power to detect a statistically significant improvement (α = 0.05; 1-sided test) over the 2.5-month external standard. (NCT00679289)
Timeframe: From baseline through up to 17 months post-baseline

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 31.93
Total2.53

[back to top]

Maximum KW2871 Antibody Levels in Plasma Following the First Infusion

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements were collected at baseline and before and 30 minutes after the initial KW2871 infusion on Day 3. The KW2871 antibody protein in patient serum was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantitation was determined to be 100 ng/mL. (NCT00679289)
Timeframe: At Baseline and Study Day 3

Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Cohort 13.22
Cohort 25.17
Cohort 39.18

[back to top]

Virologic Response at 12 Months Post-treatment Follow-up (Long-term Response, [LTR]).

LTR was obtained if serum HCV RNA level at the end of 12-month follow-up was <15 IU/mL. (NCT00686517)
Timeframe: At 12 months post-treatment (treatment period either 12 weeks or 24 weeks depending on randomization).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PEG-IFN 2420
PEG-IFN 1219
PEG-IFN + RVB 1219

[back to top]

Virologic Response at the End of Treatment Follow-up (ETR)

"ETR was achieved if serum HCV RNA level at the end of 12 or 24 weeks~treatment (depending on treatment arm) was <15 IU/mL." (NCT00686517)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (either 12 weeks or 24 weeks depending on randomization).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PEG-IFN 2426
PEG-IFN 1228
PEG-IFN + RVB 1227

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Response (SR) at the End of the 6-month Follow-up Period

SR was defined as serum Hepatitis C Virus (HCV RNA) level at the end of 6-month follow-up below 15 IU/mL. (NCT00686517)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PEG-IFN 2423
PEG-IFN 1220
PEG-IFN + RVB 1221

[back to top]

Number of Participants Presenting With Alanine Transferase (ALT) Level Normalization

ALT normalization was used as a measure of biochemical response to treatment. ALT levels were assessed at each study visit by the local laboratory, and efficacy measurements at the end of treatment, at 6 and 12 months post treatment follow-up were reported. (NCT00686517)
Timeframe: Evaluated at end of treatment (either 12 weeks or 24 weeks, depending on randomization), at 6-month follow-up visit, or at 12-month follow-up visit.

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
End of Treatment6-month Follow-up Period12-month Follow-up Period
PEG-IFN + RVB 12322823
PEG-IFN 12312723
PEG-IFN 24283127

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

"Participants were considered to have RVR if serum HCV RNA level at 2 or 4~weeks of treatment was below the cut off value of the referring local~laboratory of each participating site." (NCT00686517)
Timeframe: Evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
2 weeks after start of treatment4 weeks after start of treatment
PEG-IFN + RVB 122334
PEG-IFN 122535
PEG-IFN 242428

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (EOT) or Discontinuation

"SVR was defined as a viral response which was sustained at 24 weeks after the end of treatment as measured by Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) negativity.~HCV-RNA negativity was assessed by an reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method, where a negative response was defined by a negative qualitative HCV-RNA result." (NCT00686777)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks after the end of treatment (at the end of follow-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN + Ribavirin30.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HCV-RNA Negativity at 24 Weeks of Treatment and at EOT

HCV-RNA negativity was assessed by an RT-PCR method, where a negative response was defined by a negative qualitative HCV-RNA result. (NCT00686777)
Timeframe: Measured at 24 weeks of treatment and at EOT (Treatment week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At 24 Weeks TreatmentAt End of Treatment
PEG-IFN + Ribavirin61.366.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment

Prespecified adverse event discontinuance criteria included neutrophil count <500 /mm3, platelet count <50,000/mm3, and hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL. (NCT00686777)
Timeframe: From time of first treatment to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Due To Decrease in Neutrophil CountDue To Decrease in Neutrophil and Platelet CountDue To ApathyDue To Pleural EffusionDue To Pregnancy of Participant's PartnerDue To No VisitDue To Withdrawal by SubjectTotal Number Discontinued
PEG-IFN + Ribavirin311111210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Metavir Inflammation Score

Metavir inflammation score is a 4-point scale based on the severity of inflammation in the liver, ranging from A0 (best, no activity) to A3 (worst, severe activity). (NCT00686881)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with ≥1grade lower score (improved)Participants with no change in scoreParticipants with ≥1grade higher score (worsened)
PegIFN-2b485519
SNMC236142

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization of >16 Weeks Duration

The ALT was judged to have been normalized when the ALT level was 35 IU/L or below. (NCT00686881)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PegIFN-2b9
SNMC2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Metavir Fibrosis Score

Metavir fibrosis score is a 5-point scale based on the amount of fibrosis in the liver, ranging from F0 (best, no fibrosis) to F4 (worst, cirrhosis). (NCT00686881)
Timeframe: Baseline and discontinuation of treatment (up to 156 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with ≥1grade lower score (improved)Participants with no change in scoreParticipants with ≥1 grade higher score (worsened)
PegIFN-2b137931
SNMC117936

[back to top]

Change in Serum ALT

Change in Serum ALT concentration from baseline to week 48 (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionU/L (Mean)
500 IU qd7.8
500 IU Tid0.6
Placebo8.6

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response Rate

Percentage of participants who remained HCV RNA negative throughout the study (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
500 IU qd71.2
500 IU Tid62.3
Placebo66.7

[back to top]

Relapse Rate

"Percentage of participants with a positive seum HCV RNA level at any post-baseline evaluation~Serum HCV RNA was tested using a commercially available real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay kit (Roche Cobas TaqMan HCV assay kit) with a limit of detection of 15 IU/ml." (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
500 IU qd30.5
500 IU Tid37.7
Placebo35.1

[back to top]

Normalization of Platelets

Percentage of participants with a low platelet count at baseline who had a normal platelet count at the end of the study (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
500 IU qd81.0
500 IU Tid50.0
Placebo41.9

[back to top]

Normalization of ALT

Percentage of participants with a normal serum ALT level at the end of the study (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
500 IU qd71.2
500 IU Tid60.4
Placebo64.9

[back to top]

Change in Social Functioning

"Change in the Social Functioning domain of the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire from baseline to week 48~Social Functioning (SF) scores range from 0-100, with lower scores indicating that health/emotional problems have had a greater negative impact on social activities, compared to higher scores. SF scores are calculated using a proprietary algorithm based on responses to questions #6 and #10 on the SF-36, which are 5-point likert scales about the extent to which, and the amount of time with which physical or emotional problems have interfered with social activities." (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionchange in score (Mean)
500 IU qd21.6
500 IU Tid16.3
Placebo8.8

[back to top]

Change in Serum HCV RNA Concentration

Change in serum HCV RNA concentration (log10 IU) from baseline to week 48 (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionlog10 IU (Log Mean)
500 IU qd1.6
500 IU Tid1.9
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Change in Fibrotest Score

Change in fibrotest score from baseline to week 48 (NCT00695019)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
500 IU qd-0.37
500 IU Tid-0.19
Placebo-0.31

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ≥2-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA

The number of participants with at least a 2-log10 decrease from baseline in HCV RNA following 4 weeks of treatment with Placebo or Vaniprevir. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin19
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ≥3-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA

The number of participants with at least a 3-log10 decrease from baseline in HCV RNA following 4 weeks of treatment with Placebo or Vaniprevir. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin15
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin19
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving RVR

Rapid Viral Response (RVR) was declared if Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) was undetectable at Week 4. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin5.6
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin75.0
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin78.9
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin68.8
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin83.3

[back to top]

Mean Log Change From Baseline in HCV RNA

The mean changes from baseline in log10 HCV RNA in each vaniprevir group was compared against control treatment at Week 4. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionLog10 IU/mL (Mean)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin-3.6
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin-6.1
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin-6.3
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin-6.2
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin-6.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to AEs

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study therapy, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

The number of participants experiencing AEs in each treatment group was monitored during the Vaniprevir/Placebo treatment (Day 1 to Day 28) and safety follow-up (Day 29 to Day 42) periods. (NCT00704184)
Timeframe: Up to Day 42

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin18
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin15
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin18
Vaniprevir 600 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin16
Vaniprevir 800 mg q.d. + Peg-IFN/Ribavirin18

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 After 24 Weeks of Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d.

The percentage of participants achieving SVR24 after the 24-week Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. regimen at Week 48 was compared to the control regimen. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24- or 48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV71.1
48-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV36.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Following Treatment With Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d.

The percentage of non-cirrhotic participants with undetectable Hepatits C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) 24 weeks after completing treatment was determined for each Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. and control regimen. Results for Vaniprevir 300 mg are presented as a Secondary Outcome Measure. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24- or 48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV71.1
24-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg, 24-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV84.2
48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV78.0
48-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV19.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Following Treatment With Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d.

The percentage of non-cirrhotic participants treated with Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. with undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after completing treatment was determined. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
48-wk Vaniprevir 300 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV66.7
48-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV19.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving cEVR

The percentage of non-cirrhotic participants with complete early viral response (cEVR; undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12) was determined for each Vaniprevir dose. Since each of the Vaniprevir 600 mg arms had the same treatment history at this point in the study, the data were pooled for analysis. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: Up to Week 60

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24- or 48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV92.0
48-wk Vaniprevir 300 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV85.4
PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV9.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

The number of non-cirrhotic participants experiencing AEs during the active Vaniprevir/PBO treatment and 14-day follow-up periods was monitored for each treatment regimen. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure (signs), function (symptoms), or chemistry (laboratory data) of the body temporally associated with any use of a Sponsor product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: Up to 73 weeks

InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
24- or 48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV38
24-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg, 24-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV42
48-wk Vaniprevir 300 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV40
48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV46
48-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV41

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing From Study Treatment Due to AEs

The number of non-cirrhotic participants withdrawing from study treatment due to AEs during the active Vaniprevir/PBO treatment and 14-day follow-up periods was monitored for each treatment regimen. (NCT00704405)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
24- or 48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV2
24-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg, 24-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV3
48-wk Vaniprevir 300 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV2
48-wk Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN/RBV4
48-wk PBO + Peg-IFN/RBV1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Early Virological response (EVR) was assessed at 12 weeks after treatment start (Visit 2) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR >3) to investigate the percentage of participants who achieved EVR. EVR was defined as a substantial (greater than 2 log10) decrease in viral load (measured as International Units/milliliter) and/or negative Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based viral load qualitative result as assessed at visit 2 of the study. (NCT00705224)
Timeframe: Week 12 after treatment start

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Genotype IGenotype IIGenotype IIIOther
HOMA-IR >354.06.040.00
HOMA-IR<=351.312.734.81.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study

Sustained Virological response (SVR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively. (NCT00705224)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin81.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Response following treatment (RFT) was assessed at the end of treatment (Visit 3) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR >3) to investigate the presence or absence of RFT. RFT was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of treatment. Visit 3 was considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration. (NCT00705224)
Timeframe: Week 24 or 48 after treatment start

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Genotype IGenotype IIGenotype IIIOther
HOMA-IR >352.95.941.20
HOMA-IR<=350.612.235.91.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as Homeostasis model assessment - of insulin-resistance [HOMA-IR] >3) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively. (NCT00705224)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Genotype IGenotype IIGenotype IIIOther
HOMA-IR >347.57.545.00
HOMA-IR<=345.714.338.61.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Virological relapse (VR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR >3) to investigate the percentage of participants who demonstrated VR. VR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA (RFT +) at end of treatment (Visit 3- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but lost RFT (considered sustained non-Responders) at end of study (Visit 4- considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively). (NCT00705224)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Genotype IGenotype IIGenotype IIIOther
HOMA-IR >372.7027.30
HOMA-IR<=383.3016.70

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Undetectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 12 and at 72 Weeks After Randomization.

(NCT00708500)
Timeframe: At Follow-up Week 12 and at 72 weeks after randomization

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Follow-Up Week 1272 Weeks Post Randomization
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, Response Guided Therapy9793
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks105105
Placebo+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks1617

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Early Virologic Response.

Having undetectable HCV-RNA at Week 2, 4, 8, or 12 was considered Early Virologic Response. (NCT00708500)
Timeframe: At Week 2, 4, 8, or 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, Response Guided Therapy0074111
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks0284121
Placebo+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks02723

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) Rate in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population.

SVR is defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at Follow-up Week 24. This outcome measure evaluates SVR after treatment with boceprevir and PEG2b plus RBV versus PEG2b plus RBV alone in participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1 who failed prior treatment. (NCT00708500)
Timeframe: At Follow-up Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks21.3
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, Response Guided Therapy58.6
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks66.5

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) Rate in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population.

"SVR is defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 24. This outcome measure evaluates SVR after treatment with boceprevir and PEG2b plus RBV versus PEG2b plus RBV alone in participants with CHC genotype 1 who failed prior treatment.~This key secondary efficacy endpoint was added as per the second protocol amendment on 02 DEC 2009." (NCT00708500)
Timeframe: At Follow-up Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks21.8
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, Response Guided Therapy60.9
Boceprevir+PEG2b+RBV, x 44 Weeks66.9

[back to top]

Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

The duration of response, applied only to participants with best overall response at CR or PR, is defined as the number of days between the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the date of the event: radiological progression as per central review or death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurs first. If no event, participant is censored at the last adequate assessment. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: Time from first documented response date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death due to underlying cancer, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cut-off date.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)13.3
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)11.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab

This outcome measure was assessed continuously. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: From the date of the first participant treated until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days

Interventionweeks (Median)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)37.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of death from any cause, reported between date of first participant randomized and up to 2 years after the last participant randomized (data cutoff: 30Aug2012)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)27.1
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)27.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)9.3
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)10.0

[back to top]

Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). The PF subscale consists of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The score for the PF subscale and global health status range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Global health status/QoLPhysical functioning
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)7.89.0
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)7.48.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and Deaths

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths throughout the study. Participants were assessed continuously at each 28-day cycle. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: From the first participant randomized until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse events (serious and non-serious)Serious adverse eventsDeaths
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)1807695
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)1797993

[back to top]

Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Overall response is defined as the number of participants having achieved confirmed Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall. (NCT00719264)
Timeframe: Time from first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.

,
InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Unknown responseOverall objective response (CR+PR)
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)15084262251
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)04990251849

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment

Treatment completion was defined as those who completed both the induction and maintenance phases. (NCT00723710)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Intron A120

[back to top]

Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Observed During Dose Escalation of PEG-IFN-α-2b

"Adverse events are graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE) version 3.0. In general, grades are assigned as follows:~Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE~A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as any grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity or any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity." (NCT00724061)
Timeframe: From the date that the first patient began treatment until the last patient completed the dose escalation phase (up to 12 weeks per patient)

Interventiondose limiting toxicities (Number)
PEG-IFN-alpha-2b + UV Therapy0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on HCV Genotype at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on HCV genotype (1, 2, 3, 4, or 2 & 3) at baseline. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Genotype 1Genotype 2Genotype 3Genotype 4Genotype 2 & 3
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin8128146301

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up

Sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2). SVR was defined as undetectable plasma Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin286

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on ALT levels at baseline as assessed by investigator. Normal baseline ALT level was defined as <40 IU/mL and elevated baseline ALT level was defined as >= 40 IU/mL. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Normal Baseline ALT levelsElevated Baseline ALT levelsMissing
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin282526

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Study Treatment Dosage Modification

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on study treatment dosage modification: no dosage modification or any dosage modification of study treatment. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Dosage Modification of Study TreatmentAny Dosage Modification of Study Treatment
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin23452

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up

Virological relapse was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2). Virological relapse was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of combination treatment (Visit 1- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but with positive HCV-RNA at the 24-week post treatment follow-up. (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin23

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on HCV-RNA Viral Load at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on HCV-RNA viral load at baseline as assessed by investigator. Low viral load was defined as <400,000 International Units/milliliter (IU/mL) and high viral load was defined as >=400,000 IU/mL. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Low Viral LoadHigh Viral LoadMissing
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin9915532

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Achievement of Rapid Virological Response

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on achievement of rapid virological response (RVR) where data was available. RVR was defined as negative HCV-RNA after 4 (+/- 1) weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
RVR at Week 4 (+/- 1)Non-RVR at Week 4 (+/- 1)Missing
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin2016250

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at 24-week Post-treatment Follow-up by Subgroups Based on Liver Fibrosis Stage at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the 24-week post-treatment follow-up (Visit 2) by subgroups based on liver fibrosis stage, where biopsy was available, at baseline: absence, minimal, moderate, or significant as assessed by investigator. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of combination treatment (24 or 48 weeks of treatment duration). (NCT00724464)
Timeframe: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
AbsenceMinimalModerateSignificantMissing
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b and Ribavirin8327154157

[back to top]

Number of Participants With EOT Response by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

"EOT response was defined as HCV-RNA negative after 24 weeks of treatment in participants with HCV-RNA Genotype 2 or 3, and after 48 weeks of treatment in participants with Genotype 1, 4, 5, or 6. If there was no EOT information or if it was marked as not done then EOT was set to no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticpants (Number)
Genotype 1, 4, and 6 (N=780)Genotype 2 and 3 (n=520)Genotype missing (n=2)
Stage 1 Participants4053950

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks following EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotype 2 (n=172)Genotype 3 (n=348)Genotype 4 (n=21)Genotype 5 (n=0)Genotype 6 (n=2)Genotype missing (n=2)
Stage 1 Participants2981262075020

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype + Viral Load (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Viral load categories were defined as High (≥100,000 Iu/mL) or Low (<100,000 Iu/mL). For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotype 2 (n=172)Genotype 3 (n=348)Genotype 4 (n=21)Genotype 6 (n=2)Unknown Genotype (n=2)
Viral Load High2225374220
Viral Load Low42414300
Viral Load Missing3469119000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after four weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 =significant liver damage, the liver becomes fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas , and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
F0 (n=28)F1 (n=30)F2 (n=49)F3 (n=14)F4 (n=27)Could not be determined (n=206)Other (n=34)
Stage 2 Participants49821293

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Gender (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Female (n=122)Male (n=266)
Stage 2 Participants1937

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at Treatment Week 12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants638

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype subcategory (1a or 1b); subcategories are the result of a change in the genetic material in the viruses within the genotype." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1a (n=147)Genotype 1b (n=56)Genotype unknown (n=160)Genotype mixed (n=11)Could not be determined (n=14)
Stage 2 Participants1792613

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Weight (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
40 to <50 kg (n=16)50 to <64 kg (n=127)64 to <75 kg (n=250)75 to <85 kg (n=238)>=85 kg (n=490)Weight unknown (n=7)
Stage 2 Participants9871641432834

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Race (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aboriginal peoples/Metis (n=13)Asian (n=54)Black (n=20)Caucasian (n=1002)Hispanic (n=4)Other (n=35)
Stage 2 Participants6428609421

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment.SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 =significant liver damage, the liver becomes fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas , and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
F0 (n=66)F1 (n=144)F2 (n=212)F3 (99)F4 (n=110)Could not be determined (n=463)Other (n=34)
Stage 2 Participants4995133625328018

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Gender (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Female (n=346)Male (n=782)
Stage 2 Participants227463

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment.SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype subcategory (1a or 1b); subcategories are the result of a change in the genetic material in the viruses within the genotype." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1a (n=176)Genotype 1b (n=74)Genotype unknown (n=850)Genotype mixed (n=14)Could not be determined (n=14)
Stage 2 Participants1065151887

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation and Participants With Missing Data (Stage 1)

"Viral response was defined as negative HCV-RNA; evaluation was done 12 weeks (window 10-14 weeks) after EOT. EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at Treatment Week 12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants679

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
40 to <50 kg (n=16)50 to <64 (n=127)64 to <75 kg (n=250)75 to >85 kg (n=238)>=85 kg (n=490)Weight unknown (n=7)
Stage 2 Participants659115931932

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
40 to <50 kg (n=21)50 to <64 kg (n=160)64 to <75 kg (n=297)75 to <85 kg (n=283)>85 kg (n=541)
Stage 1 Participants1082158137251

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Subtype (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype subcategory (1a or 1b); subcategories are the result of a change in the genetic material in the viruses within the genotype." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1a (n=176)Genotype 1b (n=74)Genotype Unknown (n=850)Genotype mixed (n=14)Could not be determined (n=14)
Stage 2 Participants583736454

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by EVR Type (Stage 1)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative after 12 weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
EVR by ≥2 log reduction from baseline (n=78)EVR by HCV-RNA negative (n=389)EVR missing (n=6)
Stage 1 Participants152532

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Gender (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Female (n=432)Male (n=870)
Stage 1 Participants241397

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Gender (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Female (n=346)Male (n=782)
Stage 2 Participants167301

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Status (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HIV positive (n=11)HIV negative (n=1075)HIV status not done (n=216)
Stage 1 Participants354392

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Liver Fibrosis Score (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 =significant liver damage, the liver becomes fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas , and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
F0 (n=66)F1 (n=144)F2 (n=212)F3 (n=99)F4 (n=110)Could not be determined (n=463)Other (n=34)
Stage 2 Participants36729435351879

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 = significant liver damage, the liver is fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas, and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
F0 (n=59)F1 (n=159)F2 (n=216)F3 (n=128)F4 (n=111)Fibrosis stage unknown (n=629)
Stage 1 Participants3385904938343

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Race (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Asian (n=78)Black (n=18)Caucasian (N=1110)Hispanic (n=11)Other (n=85)
Stage 1 Participants599524442

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Race (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at six months after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aboriginal peoples/Metis (n=13)Asians (n=54)Black (n=20)Caucasian (n=1002)Hispanic (n=4)Other (n=35)
Stage 2 Participants4375407411

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Viral Load (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Viral load categories were defined as High (≥100,000 Iu/mL) or Low (<100,000 Iu/mL)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Viral load high (n=836)Viral load low (n=109)Viral load missing (n=357)
Stage 1 Participants35363222

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at Any Evaluation Point (Stage 1)

"This is a measure of the number of participants achieving a viral response (negative hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV-RNA]) at either of the follow-up evaluation time points (12 weeks [window 10-14 weeks] or ≥22 weeks after the end of treatment (EOT). Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants685

[back to top]

Percentage of Compliance for Participants Achieving SVR Based on Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) (Stage 2)

"Compliance was defined as participants taking ≥80% versus <80% of their doses; compliance ≥80% was derived from participants who answered always or most of the time to Questions 4 (How often do you stick to your medication schedule for your Ribavirin?) and 5 (How often do you stick to your medication schedule for your Redipen [peginterferon] injections?) of the 6-question compliance questionnaire. Percentages are based on the total number of participants within each compliance category. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Compliance < 80% (n=10)Compliance ≥80% (n=304)
Stage 2 Participants40.039.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR) (Stage 1)

"This is a measure of the number of participants who achieved SVR, defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants638

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR Who Achieved SVR (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after four weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 2 Participants35

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment (window of 2 to 6 weeks). Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 2 Participants56

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 2 Participants690

[back to top]

Relapse Rate by HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

"The relapse rate was calculated with these parameters: EOT yes, EVR evaluation valid, and ≥22 weeks of follow-up data. There were no imputations for EOT or SVR. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=251)Genotype 2 (n=123)Genotype 3 (n=217)Genotype 4 (n=5)Genotype 6 (n=2)
Stage 1 Participants11.53.29.740.00

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

"Viral response was defined as negative HCV-RNA; evaluation was done 12 weeks (window 10-14 weeks) after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotype 2 (n=172)Genotype 3 (n=348)Genotype 4 (n=21)Genotype 5 (n=0)Genotype 6 (n=2)Genotype unknown (n=2)
Stage 1 Participants3081292156020

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT by Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)

"Viral response was defined as negative HCV-RNA; evaluation was done 12 weeks (window 10-14 weeks) after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 =significant liver damage, the liver becomes fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas, and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly)." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
F0 (n=59)F1 (n=159)F2 (n=216)F3 (n=128)F4 (n=111)Fibrosis stage unknown (n=629)
Stage 1 Participants3489955140351

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR (Stage 1)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: From Week 10 to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants473

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving EVR Who Achieved SVR (Stage 2)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA undetectable with a ≥2 log reduction in HCV-RNA from baseline or HCV-RNA undetectable after 12 weeks of treatment. SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 2 Participants399

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Weight (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
40 to <50 kg (n=3)50-<64 kg (n=40)64 to <75 kg (n=83)75 to <85 kg (n=86)>=85 kg (n=169)Weight unknown (n=7)
Stage 2 Participants08911271

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving RVR by Race (Stage 2)

"RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment (window of 2 to 6 weeks). Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aboriginal peoples/Metis (n=10)Asian (n=19)Black (n=8)Caucasian (n=343)Hispanic (n=1)Other (n=7)
Stage 2 Participants0604703

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation (Stage 1)

"Viral response was defined as negative HCV-RNA. EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at Treatment Week 12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants660

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at 12 Weeks After EOT (Stage 1)

"This is a measure of the number of participants achieving a viral response (negative HCV-RNA) at 12 weeks (window 10-14 weeks) after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants660

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Achieving SVR Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Prior to EVR Evaluation and Participants With Missing Data (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at Treatment Week 12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants612

[back to top]

Number of Participants With End of Treatment (EOT) Response (Stage 1)

"EOT response was defined as HCV-RNA negative after 24 weeks of treatment in participants with HCV Genotype 2 or 3, and after 48 weeks of treatment in participants with Genotype 1, 4, 5, or 6. If there was no EOT information or if it was marked as not done then EOT was set to no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants800

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Treatment Due to Adverse Events (Stage 1 and Stage 2)

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants76
Stage 2 Participants142

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Viral Response at Any Evaluation Point, Excluding Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Prior to Early Virologic Response (EVR) Evaluation (Stage 1)

"Viral response was defined as negative HCV-RNA. EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at Treatment Week 12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stage 1 Participants685

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Drug Due to Adverse Events by Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals. (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Genotypes 1, 4, and 6 (n=780)Genotype 2 and 3 (n=520)
Stage 1 Participants5224

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Weight + Chronic HCV Genotype (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotype 2 (n=172)Genotype 3 (n=348)Genotype 4 (n=21)Genotype 6 (n=2)Genotype unknown (n=2)
>85 kg1185875000
40 to <50 kg451000
50 to <64 kg391131010
64 to <75 kg762653210
75 to <85 kg612647300

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR by Chronic HCV Genotype + Liver Fibrosis Stage (Stage 1)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at ≥22 weeks after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. Liver fibrosis stage was measured with the METAVIR scoring system (F0=no fibrosis or liver damage, F1 = beginning of liver damage with some slight scarring, F2 = moderate liver damage, scarring advancing in liver and surrounding blood vessels, F3 =significant liver damage, the liver becomes fibrotic [scarred] and connects with other scarred areas, and F4 = severe damage [cirrhosis] and liver no longer functions properly). For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotype 2 (n=172)Genotype 3 (n=348)Genotype 4 (n=21)Genotype 6 (n=2)Unknown Genotype (n=2)
Stage F02148000
Stage F1551713000
Stage F2641313000
Stage F328910020
Stage F42529200
Unknown Stage10581154300

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving SVR (Stage 2)

"SVR was defined as HCV-RNA negative at six months after EOT. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stage 2 Participants468

[back to top]

Number of Participants With EVR by Selected Chronic HCV Genotypes (Stage 1)

"EVR was defined as either HCV-RNA detectable with a ≥2 log reduction from baseline or HCV-RNA negative at TW12. Participants with no viral response information were considered viral response no. For this analysis participants were grouped by their HCV genotype (Types 1-6); a genotype is a classification based on the differences in the genetic material within the hepatitis virus. Knowing the HCV genotype helps with deciding what type and what duration of treatment will be needed because each genotype demonstrates a different response to treatment in infected individuals." (NCT00724893)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Genotype 1 (n=757)Genotypes 1,4, and 6 (n=780)
Stage 1 Participants461473

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Antiviral Treatment Who Were Also on Substitution Therapy

This measure was the number of all of the participants who received antiviral treatment who also received substitution therapy. (NCT00725751)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Participants90

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment With PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin

For participants with Genotype 1 or 4 completion of treatment was at Week 48; for participants with Genotype 2, 3, or 1 with low viral load or rapid virologic response, completion of therapy was at Week 24. (NCT00725751)
Timeframe: 24 to 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin With Substitution Therapy56
PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin Without Substitution Therapy150

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

SVR was defined as a hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) value below the limit of detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. For participants with Genotype 1 or 4 completion of treatment was at Week 48; for participants with Genotype 2, 3, or 1 with low viral load or rapid virologic response, completion of therapy was at Week 24. (NCT00725751)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the end of treatment (i.e. 48 or 72 weeks depending on genotype)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin With Substitution Therapy42
PegIFN-2b/Ribavirin Without Substitution Therapy111

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Tolerated Treatment With PegIntron 1.5 mcg/kg/Week + Rebetol 10.6 mg/kg/Week

Tolerability of the treatment was measured by number of participants with complete treatment. (NCT00726557)
Timeframe: Assessed at the end of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants Who Tolerated Treatment118

[back to top]

Number of Drug-substituted Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response (SVR) With PegIntron 1.5 μg/kg/Week and Rebetol (10.6 mg/kg/Day) in Substitution Centers Under Routine Conditions

Participants who achieved SVR (sustained virological response) at the end of treatment (24 weeks for genotypes 2,3 and 48 weeks for genotypes 1,4) were analyzed for sustained response at the end of the follow-up period (24 weeks after end of treatment). SVR is defined as having negative HCV-RNA (hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid). (NCT00726557)
Timeframe: End of Follow-up (Week 48 or Week 72, depending on genotype)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Opioid substitution with methadone (n=52)Opioid substitution with levo-methadone (n=13)Opioid substitution with buprenorphine (n=26)Opioid substitution with other medication (n=1)No opioid substitution medication (n=9)
Participants With Negative HCV-RNA at End of Treatment49102309

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

Time to progression was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of documented progression. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event (including participants who died before progressive disease) were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A10.2
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A5.5

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last tumor assessment or last treatment administration, whichever occurred last. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A8.1
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A4.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status

Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 7, 15, 23, 31, 43

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Baseline (n=337, 304)Change at Week 7 (n=291, 263)Change at Week 15 (n=242, 196)Change at Week 23 (n=195, 143)Change at Week 31 (n=166, 108)Change at Week 43 (n=137, 79)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A9000000
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A9000000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

Best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression. Based on assessment of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), according to mRECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of the LD of all target lesions. CR and PR persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Reference is the smallest sum LD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Missing (no response assessment)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A1.630.744.420.62.6
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A2.410.050.533.23.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Duration

Duration of survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (up to 4.25 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A23.3
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A21.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4.25 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A67.3
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A69.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A92.0
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A92.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to mRECIST

Objective response referred to participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions taking as reference the screening sum LD. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat assessments that should have been performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Longer intervals as determined by the study protocol were also appropriate. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A32.4
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A90.5
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A91.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first date of documented progression or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor assessment was performed using modified RECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20 percentage(%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization. (NCT00738530)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A10.2
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A5.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease Recurrence

Number of participants with disease recurrence was being measured. (NCT00749684)
Timeframe: Throughout 12 months of treatment and 24 months of follow-up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adults With Malignant Melanoma at High Risk of Relapse52

[back to top]

Relapse Free Survival Time

Median time to recurrence according to Kaplan Maier evaluation (NCT00749684)
Timeframe: Throughout 12 months of treatment and 24 months of follow-up

Interventionmonths (Median)
Adults With Malignant Melanoma at High Risk of Relapse54.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. (NCT00784836)
Timeframe: Planned for up to 18 months plus 30 days; actual study duration was 111 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Avonex30

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Patients were censored if they did not progress, stopped particiaption due to an adverse event, or withdrew consent following the start of study treatment. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines version 1.0. Per RECIST v1.0, Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a measurable increase in smallest diameter of any target or non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, since baseline. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: From date of study treatment start until date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 15 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratum 15.5263
Stratum 23.9145

[back to top]

Best Response (BR)

BR is recorded from start of treatment until progressive disease (PD). Imaging was repeated by same technique after every 4 cycles of treatment. Response was evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines version 1.0. Per RECIST v1.0 and CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage in sum of LD of target lesions to be PR nor increase of >=20%; PD, increase in existing lesions or new lesions. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: After every 4 cycles of treatment (approximately every 56 days for up to about 280 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Not evaluable (NE)
Stratum 106761
Stratum 2031564

[back to top]

Early Response Rate (RR) (Stratum 1 Only)

Early RR evaluated in stratum 1 to see if bevacizumab (bev) would be added to GFL treatment (tx). Patients with stable disease (SD) pre 5th cycle of tx had bev added. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Per RECIST and CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions; SD, neither sufficient shrinkage in sum of LD of target lesions to be PR nor increase of >=20%; Progressive Disease (PD), increase in existing lesions or new lesions. (NCT00786643)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of treatment (approximately 56 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Not evaluable (NE)
Stratum 105762

[back to top]

All Cause Mortality Rate at 6 Months

A long-term secondary efficacy variable was all cause mortality at 6 months following commencement of treatment (NCT00789685)
Timeframe: 6 months following commencement of therapy

Interventionpercentage of patients who died (Number)
Safety Population11.1

[back to top]

Clinically Significant Treatment Emergent Events

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in safety population (NCT00789685)
Timeframe: From first dose up until Day 28

InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
TEAEsSevere TEAEsSerious TEAEsDrug-Related TEAEsSerious Drug-Related TEAEsTEAEs leading to withdrawal
Safety Population3730222086

[back to top]

All Cause Mortality at Day 28

The primary efficacy variable was all cause mortality at Day 28 following commencement of treatment (NCT00789685)
Timeframe: 28 days following commencement of therapy

Interventionpercentage of patients who died (Number)
Safety Population8.1

[back to top]

OS - Percentage of Participants With an Event

OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Interferon41.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Reponse (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Percentage of participants with objective response, termed responders, based assessment of confirmed CR or confirmed PR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study greater than or equal to (≥)4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis less than [<]10 millimeters [mm]). No new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Interferon28.8

[back to top]

OS - Time to Event

OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Interferon30.7

[back to top]

EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 millimeters (mm) (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Participants were asked to rate their health state and mark the line; the distance from the left edge was recorded. For change from baseline a negative value represents a worsening in the health state and a positive value represents an improvement in the health state. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Screening/Baseline, Cycle 7, Cycle 25, Cycle 43, Cycle 61, and EOT

Interventionmm (Mean)
Baseline (n=140)Cycle 7 (n=103)Change at Cycle 7 (n=99)Cycle 25 (n=68)Change at Cycle 25 (n=67)Cycle 43 (n=36)Change at Cycle 43 (n=36)Cycle 61 (n=22)Change at Cycle 61 (n=22)EOT (n=79)Change at EOT (n=77)
Bevacizumab + Interferon71.271.8-1.872.4-2.371.3-0.970.5-1.765.2-7.7

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Progression Free at 12 and 24 Months

PFS at 12 and 24 months is an estimate of the percentages of participants expected to be progression free at 12 and 24 months based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the PFS data. PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
Bevacizumab + Interferon58.228.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Health Problems as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) by Visit

EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). Answers from the questionnaire for each dimension (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) was classified into one of 2 categories: 'no problems' or 'any problems', and the percentage of participants in each category was determined. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Screening/Baseline, Cycle 7, Cycle 25, Cycle 43, Cycle 61, and End of Treatment (EOT)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mobility, no problems, Baseline (n=142)Mobility, any problems, Baseline (n=142)Mobility, no problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Mobility, any problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Mobility, no problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Mobility, any problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Mobility, no problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Mobility, any problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Mobility, no problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Mobility, any problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Mobility, no problems, EOT (n=82)Mobility, any problems, EOT (n=82)Self-care, no problems, Baseline (n=145)Self-care, any problems, Baseline (n=145)Self-care, no problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Self-care, any problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Self-care, no problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Self-care, any problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Self-care, no problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Self-care, any problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Self-care, no problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Self-care, any problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Self-care, no problems, EOT (n=80)Self-care, any problems, EOT (n=80)Usual activity, no problems, Baseline (n=145)Usual activity, any problems, Baseline (n=145)Usual activity, no problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Usual activity, any problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Usual activity, no problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Usual activity, any problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Usual activity, no problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Usual activity, any problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Usual activity, no problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Usual activity, any problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Usual activity, no problems, EOT (n=78)Usual activity, any problems, EOT (n=78)Pain/discomfort, no problems, Baseline (n=145)Pain/discomfort, any problems, Baseline (n=145)Pain/discomfort, no problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Pain/discomfort, any problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Pain/discomfort, no problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Pain/discomfort, any problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Pain/discomfort, no problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Pain/discomfort, any problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Pain/discomfort, no problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Pain/discomfort, any problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Pain/discomfort, no problems, EOT (n=80)Pain/discomfort, any problems, EOT (n=80)Anxiety/depression, no problems, Baseline (n=144)Anxiety/depression, any problems, Baseline (n=144)Anxiety/depression, no problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Anxiety/depression, any problems, Cycle 7 (n=106)Anxiety/depression, no problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Anxiety/depression, any problems, Cycle 25 (n=69)Anxiety/depression, no problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Anxiety/depression, any problems, Cycle 43 (n=36)Anxiety/depression, no problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Anxiety/depression, any problems, Cycle 61 (n=22)Anxiety/depression, no problems, EOT (n=80)Anxiety/depression, any problems, EOT (n=80)
Bevacizumab + Interferon69.031.064.235.858.042.038.961.140.959.141.358.882.817.281.118.981.218.869.430.677.322.763.836.360.739.353.846.246.453.633.366.745.554.533.366.748.351.749.150.953.646.450.050.050.050.033.866.345.854.255.744.362.337.761.138.959.140.945.055.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive at 12 and 24 Months

OS at 12 and 24 months is the estimate of the percentages of participants expected to alive at 12 and 24 months based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the survival data. Median OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
Bevacizumab + Interferon84.159.6

[back to top]

PFS - Time to Event

PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline assessment tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Interferon15.3

[back to top]

PFS - Percentage of Participants With an Event

PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline assessment tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed. (NCT00796757)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Interferon69.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Adverse Event.

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT00800735)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks after the end of treatment (up to 72 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated-interferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin80.0

[back to top]

Cerebral MRI Assessment: Total Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan

Total volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is obtained from the sum of the volumes of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the study divided by the total number of scans performed during the study. (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionmililiters per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.068
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.019
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.020
Placebo + GA0.052
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA0.031
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA0.014

[back to top]

Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities [PCSA]

"PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review.~Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows:~Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT] >3, 5, 10 or 20 Upper Normal Limit [ULN];~Aspartate aminotransferase [AST] >3, 5, 10 or 20 ULN;~Alkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULN;~Total Bilirubin [TB] >1.5 or 2 ULN;~ALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN;" (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake in PDY6045/PDY6046 study up to 112 days after last intake in initial study or in the extension study, whichever occured last (64 weeks max)

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT >3 ULN- ALT >5 ULN- ALT >10 ULNAST >3 ULN- AST >5 ULNAlkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULNTB >1.5 ULNALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN
Placebo + GA11110000
Placebo + IFN-β21011100
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA11000000
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β31010000
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA00000000
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β10000000

[back to top]

Overview of 12-week Sustained Disability Progression

"12-week sustained disability progression was defined as an increase from baseline of at least 1-point in EDSS score (at least 0.5-point for participants with baseline EDSS score >5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks.~If no disability progression was observed on or before last EDSS evaluation before study drug discontinuation, then the participant was considered as free of disability progression." (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Disability progressionFree of disability progression
Placebo + GA437
Placebo + IFN-β040
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA436
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β236
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA141
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β333

[back to top]

Overview of Adverse Events [AE]

AE are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake in PDY6045/PDY6046 study up to 112 days after last intake in initial study or in the extension study, whichever occured last (64 weeks max)

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE- serious AE- AE leading to death- AE leading to study drug discontinuation
Placebo + GA39602
Placebo + IFN-β35202
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA38205
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β33103
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA40503
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β35403

[back to top]

Overview of AE With Potential Risk of Occurence

"AE with potential risk of occurrence were defined as follows:~Hepatic disorders;~Immune effects, mainly effects on bone marrow and infection;~Pancreatic disorders;~Malignancy;~Skin disorders, mainly hair loss and hair thinning;~Pulmonary disorders;~Hypertension;~Peripheral neuropathy;~Psychiatric disorders;~Hypersensitivity." (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake in PDY6045/PDY6046 study up to 112 days after last intake in initial study or in the extension study, whichever occured last (64 weeks max)

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE with potential risk of occurence- Hepatic disorder AE- Immune effects related AE- Pancreatic disorder AE- Malignancy AE- Hair loss / hair thinning AE- Pulmonary disorder AE- Hypertension-related AE- Peripheral neuropathy AE- Psychiatric disorder AE- Hypersensitivity AE
Placebo + GA3452760100434
Placebo + IFN-β2871680101516
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA3252111070210110
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β301320110406424
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA3342260512536
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β30112150304314

[back to top]

Time to 12-week Sustained Disability Progression: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Disability Progression at Timepoints

"Probability of disability progression at 24 and 48 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to disability progression defined as the time from randomization to first EDSS increase. Participants free of disability progression were censored at the date of the last on-treatment EDSS evaluation.~Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t is 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t." (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Probability of disability progression at 24 weeksProbability of disability progression at 48 weeks
Placebo + GA2.510.6
Placebo + IFN-β0.00.0
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA5.612.8
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β2.76.4
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA0.03.3
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β3.011.1

[back to top]

Cerebral MRI Assessment: Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)

"Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is obtained from the total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the study divided by the total number of scans performed during the study.~To account for the different number of scans among participants, two Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable, log-transformed number of scans as offset variable and:~Model 1 (IFN-β groups): Treatment group, region of enrollment, IFN-β dose level and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates~Model 2 (GA groups): Treatment group, region of enrollment and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates)" (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionlesions per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.521
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.080
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.090
Placebo + GA0.333
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA0.120
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA0.178

[back to top]

Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease)

"Total lesion volume is the sum of the total volume of all T2-lesions and the total volume all T1-hypointense post-gadolinium lesions measured through T2/proton density scan analysis and gadolinium-enhanced T1 scan analysis.~Least-square means were estimated using two Mixed-effect models with repeated measures [MMRM] on cubic root transformed volume data:~Model 1 (IFN-β groups): treatment group, region of enrollment, IFN-β dose level, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value (cubic root transformed), and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors;~Model 2 (GA groups): treatment group, region of enrollment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value (cubic root transformed), and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors." (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: baseline (before randomization in PDY6045 or PDY6046) and 48 weeks

Interventionmililiters (mL) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + IFN-β-0.017
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β-0.011
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β-0.012
Placebo + GA0.016
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA-0.010
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA-0.063

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates

"ARR is obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occured during the treatment period divided by the sum of the treatment durations.~Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever - was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score or Functional System scores.~To account for the different treatment durations among participants, two Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable, log-transformed treatment duration as offset variable and:~Model 1 (IFN-β groups): treatment group, region of enrollment and IFN-β dose level as covariates~Model 2 (GA groups): treatment group and region of enrollment as covariates)" (NCT00811395)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Placebo + IFN-β0.343
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-β0.231
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-β0.144
Placebo + GA0.420
Teriflunomide 7 mg + GA0.262
Teriflunomide 14 mg + GA0.497

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Indicated No Difficulty With the Injection Procedure of the Manual Injection or the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector

"Participants assessed whether they had experienced any difficulty with the procedure in preparing, injecting, removing, and disposing process after each injection with the Avonex single-use autoinjector by answering yes or no to the following question: Did you have any difficulty with your injection? The percentage of participants answering no to this question for both the manual injection on Day 1 and the autoinjector on Days 8. 15 and 22 are presented." (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (Manual Injection); n=70Day 8 (Autoinjector); n=71Day 15 (Autoinjector); n=71Day 22 (Autoinjector); n=71
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset89909090

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Rated the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector Printed and DVD Training Materials as Very Effective

Participants evaluated how effective the printed and DVD instructions were in educating how to use the Avonex single-use autoinjector. Participants could choose one of the following descriptive answers: not effective at all, somewhat ineffective, neutral, somewhat effective, or very effective. (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Printed instructions, Day 8; n=68DVD, Day 8; n=69Printed instructions, Day 15; n=42DVD, Day 15; n=10Printed instructions, Day 22; n=24DVD, Day 22; n=9
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset938890909289

[back to top]

Mean Score for Ease of Use Grading Scale

Participants scored the ease of use of the Avonex manual injector (Day 1) and single-use autoinjector (Days 8, 15, 22) using a scale that ranged from 0 (extremely difficult) to 10 (extremely easy). (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (Manual Injection) n=72, 19Day 8 (Autoinjector) n= 72, 18Day 15 (Autoinjector) n=71, 16Day 22 (Autoinjector) n=70, 7
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset7.46.86.75.9
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset8.18.98.79.3

[back to top]

Mean Pain Score After Injection

Participants scored their pain level after the use of the manual prefilled syringe on Day 1 and the Avonex single-use autoinjector on Days 8, 15, and 22 on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely painful). (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (Manual Injection) n=72, 19Day 8 (Autoinjector) n= 72, 18Day 15 (Autoinjector) n=71, 16Day 22 (Autoinjector) n=70, 7
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset2.51.92.12.4
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset1.71.01.30.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Indicated a Preference for the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector Over the Manual Avonex Prefilled Syringe

Participants were asked whether they preferred using the Avonex single-use autoinjector over the manual Avonex prefilled syringe. Preference was defined as participants answering yes to the following question: Do you prefer this single-use autoinjector over the manual injection? (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 23

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset94
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in the Main Subset With Overall Success Using the Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector

A trainer/observer documented the participant's ability to self-inject with the Avonex single-use autoinjector and completed an observation form. Overall success in using the device for each participant was defined as no failures occurring in any step (ie, device set-up, self-administration of injection, and capping/disposal of the device) during the participant's use of the single-use Avonex autoinjector. (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 22

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset89

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Initial Subset Who Were Satisfied With the Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector

"Number of participants in the Initial Subset who answered yes to the question Were you satisfied with this single-use injector? on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire." (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 23

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset14

[back to top]

Mean Score for Initial Subset on Autoinjector Instructions Grading Scale

"Participants in the Initial Subset were asked to answer the question How satisfied are you with the presentation of the autoinjector instructions? on a rating scale of 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied)." (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset9.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No Erythema, Induration, or Tenderness, and Normal Temperature at the Injection Site After Injection With the Avonex Single-use Autoinjector

The clinician/investigator evaluated the injection site for erythema, induration, and tenderness as none, mild, moderate, or severe after the use of the Avonex single-use autoinjector. Temperature at the injection site was evaluated as normal, warm, or hot. Those participants having no erythema, induration, or tenderness, and normal temperature at the injection site after injection are presented. (NCT00828204)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 through 22 (highest severity reported between Days 8 and 22)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No ErythemaNo IndurationNo TendernessNormal Temperature
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Initial Subset9510079100
Avonex Single-Use Autoinjector: Main Subset658690100

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

Proportion of subjects achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24-weeks after completion of treatment (NCT00845676)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin62

[back to top]

At Least 50% Shrinkage in Tumor Measurements by Physical Examination

(NCT00846430)
Timeframe: Monthly physical exam first three months and then every three months after, for up to 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Open-Label Intervention7

[back to top]

No Reported Psychological Toxicity Based Upon Psychological Evaluations

Psychological toxicity defined as suicidal ideation (NCT00846430)
Timeframe: Psychological evaluation at 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Open-Label Intervention8

[back to top]

Response by MRI Measurements

partial response by RICST criteria is defined as >50% tumor shrinkage (NCT00846430)
Timeframe: evaluated 6, 12 and 24 months compared to baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial Response at 6 monthsComplete Response at 6 monthsLess than Partial Response at 6 monthsPartial Response at 12 monthsComplete Response at 12 monthsLess than Partial Response at 12 monthsPartial Response at 24 monthsComplete Response at 24 monthsLess than Partial Response at 24 monthsno longer participating at 24 months
Open-Label Intervention0182164113

[back to top]

Improvement of Symptoms and Pain

Subjects will be evaluated for pain and Quality of Life scores (NCT00846430)
Timeframe: Monthly physical exam first three months and then every three months after, for up to 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Open-Label Intervention9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 log10 Maximal Decrease in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels During ABT-333 Treatment

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The baseline value was the HCV RNA measurement before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1. Data are reported as the percentage of participants. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Prior to the first dose on Day 1 and Day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV87.5
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV87.5
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV62.5
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV16.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

"An AE was any untoward medical occurrence that did not have a causal relationship with treatment. An Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) was any noxious and undesired reaction related to the experimental drug or experiment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in or prolonged hospitalization, resulted in congenital anomaly, was persistent or caused significant disability/incapacity, spontaneous or elective abortion, or required intervention to prevent a serious outcome. AEs were rated for severity as either:~Mild - transient and easily tolerated;~Moderate - caused discomfort and interrupted usual activities;~Severe - caused considerable interference with usual activities, may be incapacitating or life-threatening.~AEs related to direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) were assessed as being either probably or possibly related by the investigator." (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: AEs were collected from the time of study drug administration to 30 days after last dose of study drug (8 Weeks)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEAny AE at least possibly drug relatedAny severe AEAny serious AEAny AE leading to discontinuation of study drugAny fatal eventsDeaths
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV8200000
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV8410000
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV8300000
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV5100000

[back to top]

Mean Maximal Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels During ABT-333 Monotherapy Treatment

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (reported as log10 IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The baseline value was the HCV RNA measurement before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1. The maximal change during monotherapy was nadir minus the baseline log10 HCV RNA level. Nadir was defined as the lowest log10 HCV RNA level any time after the first dose of study drug on Day 1 through the last log10 HCV RNA level before the first dose of study drug on Day 3. Data are reported as the least squares mean change from nadir ± standard error. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Prior to the first dose on Day 1 to before first dose on Day 3

Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-1.01
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-0.78
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV-0.68
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV-0.26

[back to top]

Mean Maximal Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels Through Day 28

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (reported as log10 IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The baseline value was the HCV RNA measurement before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1. The maximal change during treatment was nadir minus the baseline log10 HCV RNA level. Nadir was defined as the lowest log10 HCV RNA level any time after the first dose of study drug on Day 1 through the last log10 HCV RNA level on Day 28. Data are reported as the least squares mean change from nadir ± standard error. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Prior to the first dose on Day 1 through Day 28

Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-3.65
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-3.96
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV-3.59
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV-1.37

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose (AUC12) of ABT-333

Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-333 using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC; measured in ng*hr/mL) measures the total exposure of a drug in blood plasma. The AUC12 of ABT-333 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV5852
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV7548
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV12411

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels ≤ 25 IU/mL (the Lower Limit of Quantitation [LLOQ]) at Day 28 or Final Visit

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was defined as HCV RNA levels ≤ 25 IU/mL. Data are reported as the percentage of participants. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Day 28 or Final Visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV37.5
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV25.0
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV62.5
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels Through Day 28 or Final Visit

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (reported as log10 IU/mL) were determined using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The baseline value was the HCV RNA measurement before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1 and the Day 28 or Final Visit value was the last HCV RNA measurement during the study. Data are reported as the least squares mean change from baseline ± standard error. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Day 28 and Final Visit

,,,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 28 (n=8, 7, 7, 5)Final Visit
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV-3.24-3.48
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-3.65-3.65
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV-3.67-3.86
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV-1.45-1.35

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resistance-Associated Variants in Non-structural Viral Protein 5B (NS5B) Through Day 28

Samples from Days 1, 5, 10, 17, 24 and 28 were analyzed for the presence of resistance-associated amino acids using population sequencing and compared to the baseline non-structural viral protein 5B (NS5B) sequence to assess amino acid changes. The amino acid sequence of NS5B before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1 was defined as the baseline sequence. The number of participants with variants at resistance-associated amino acid positions in the post-baseline samples are presented. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Days 1, 5, 10, 17, 24 and 28

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 1Day 5 (n=6, 8, 7)Day 10 (n=6, 6, 7)Day 17 (n=5, 5, 6)Day 24 (n=3, 3, 2)Day 28 (n=4, 3, 3)
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV012213
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV011232
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV111232

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Pegylated Interferon (pegIFN)

Blood samples were collected prior to the morning dose on Day 3; 4 hours after the morning dose on Day 3; prior to the morning dose on Days 4 and 5; and single samples were collected on Days 10, 17, 24, and 28. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of pegIFN (measured in ng/mL) using validated analytical methods and estimated using non-compartmental methods. Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Prior to the morning dose on Day 3; 4 hours after the morning dose on Day 3; prior to the morning dose on Days 4 and 5; and single samples were collected on Days 10, 17, 24, and 28

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Prior to morning dose on Day 34 hours after morning dose on Day 3 (n=7, 8, 8, 6)Day 4 (n=8, 8, 7, 6)Day 5Day 10Day 17 (n=8, 8, 8, 5)Day 24 (n=8, 7, 8, 5)Day 28 (n=8, 7, 8, 5)
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV0.000.094.955.574.728.7312.117.0
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV0.000.706.969.067.9112.312.817.4
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV0.001.366.517.916.479.2612.117.3
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV0.000.583.424.854.487.058.5814.3

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of ABT-333

Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-333 using validated analytical methods. The time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax; measured in hours) is the time it takes for a drug to achieve Cmax. The Tmax of ABT-333 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2

InterventionHours (Mean)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV3.80
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV3.50
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV3.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Levels ≤ 10 IU/mL (Lower Limit of Detection [LLOD]) at Day 28 or Final Visit

Serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was defined as a HCV RNA level equal to 10 IU/mL. Data are reported as the percentage of participants. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Day 28 or Final Visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV37.5
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV0.00
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV12.5
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV0.00

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Ribavirin (RBV)

Blood samples were collected prior to the morning dose on Day 3; 4 hours after the morning dose on Day 3; prior to the morning dose on Days 4 and 5; and single samples were collected on Days 10, 17, 24, and 28. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of RBV (measured in ng/mL) using validated analytical methods and estimated using non-compartmental methods. Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Prior to the morning dose on Day 3; 4 hours after the morning dose on Day 3; prior to the morning dose on Days 4 and 5; and single samples were collected on Days 10, 17, 24, and 28

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Prior to morning dose on Day 34 hours after morning dose on Day 3Day 4 (n=5, 7, 5, 5)Day 5 (n=6, 6, 8, 5)Day 10 (n=7, 8, 8, 6)Day 17 (n=8, 8, 8, 5)Day 24 (n=8, 7, 8, 5)Day 28 (n=8, 7, 8, 5)
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV0.000.510.290.481.021.321.601.56
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV0.000.460.330.611.051.471.761.76
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV0.000.610.460.691.241.671.912.07
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV0.000.540.360.551.051.341.491.68

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ABT-333

Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-333 using validated analytical methods. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; measured in ng/mL) is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval. The Cmax of ABT-333 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Day 1; and pre-dose on Day 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV883
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV1236
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV1975

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Maximal Phenotypic Resistance to ABT-333 >10 Fold Relative to Baseline Through Day 28

Phenotypic resistance to ABT-333 was assessed by calculating the fold difference in the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) compared with the EC50 for the corresponding baseline sample, and the maximal fold change in EC50 from baseline over the Day 5-28 period. The resistance sample drawn before the first dose of ABT-333 on Day 1 was defined as the baseline sample. The number of participants with phenotypic resistance in the post-baseline samples are presented. (NCT00851890)
Timeframe: Days 1 through 28

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ABT-333 (300 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV4
ABT-333 (600 mg) Twice Daily (BID) + pegIFN/RBV4
ABT-333 (1200 mg) Once Daily (QD) + pegIFN/RBV5

[back to top]

Failure-free Survival (FFS)

Failure-free survival is the elapsed time from the date of initiation of study treatment until date of documented disease progression, relapse after response, or death from any cause. For patients alive and free of relapse or progression, follow-up time was censored at the last documented date of failure-free status. (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: From date of treatment initiation until date of documented disease progression, relapse after response, or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Induction + Maintenance2.7

[back to top]

Expressions of c-Rel, IRF-4 and Other Molecular Events in Participants

Expressions of c-Rel, IRF-4 or other molecular events (p53, p16 mutations) including expansion of novel clones obtained at time of relapse will be compared to baseline data using paired t-test. (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: At time of relapse or disease progression, assessed up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline IRF-4 Expression, PositiveBaseline IRF-4 Expression, NegativeIRF-4 Expression at Relapse, Newly PositiveBaseline c-Rel Expression, Faintly PositiveBaseline c-Rel Expression, PositiveBaseline c-Rel Expression, NegativeBaseline p53 Expression, PositiveBaseline p53 Expression, NegativeBaseline p15/16 alterations, homozygous deletionBaseline p15/16 alterations, heterozygous deletionBaseline p15/16 alterations, no deletions
Induction + Maintenance39232315122

[back to top]

The Effect of Valproic Acid Therapy on Persistence of Clonal Disease in Patients Who Achieve Clinical Remission

Number of participants achieving a molecular remission after starting valproic acid as evidenced by disappearance of T-cell clonality as measured by gene rearrangement studies using multiplex PCR (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: 3, 6 and 12 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
3 months, CR or PR, with molecular remission6 months, CR with molecular remission9 months, CR with molecular remission12 months, CR with molecular remission
Part 2B Maintenance (Up to 12 Months)0111

[back to top]

Presence of Minimal Residual Disease at 3 and 6 Months of Maintained Remission and at 1 Year Post Initiation of Therapy

"Number of participants achieving complete response (CR) with minimal residual disease at 3, 6 and 12 months post-initiation of protocol therapy. Treatment response was assessed according to the International Consensus Review's adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) consensus report by Tsukasaki et al published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) in 2009.~For imaging, Cheson criteria was used to assess response:~Complete response (CR): Disappearance of all clinical, microscopic, and radiographic evidence of disease. All lymph nodes regressed to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm), and previously involved nodes that were 1.1 to 1.5 cm decreased to ≤ 1.0 cm. In addition, abnormally elevated peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 4 x 10^9 /L.~Partial response (PR): ≥ 50% reduction in measurable disease and abnormal lymphocyte count in peripheral blood.~CR or PR had to persist for a period of at least 4 weeks." (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: 3, 6 and 12 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
3 months, CR w/minimal residual disease6 months, CR w/minimal residual disease12 months, CR w/minimal residual disease
Part 2B Maintenance (Up to 12 Months)310

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Clinical Response to Protocol Therapy Who Lack IRF-4 and/or c-Rel Expression.

"Number of patients achieving clinical response (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) who lack interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF-4) or c-Rel biomarker expression. Treatment response was assessed according to the International Consensus Review's adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) consensus report by Tsukasaki et al published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) in 2009.~For imaging, Cheson criteria was used to assess response:~Complete response (CR): Disappearance of all clinical, microscopic, and radiographic evidence of disease. All lymph nodes regressed to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm), and previously involved nodes that were 1.1 to 1.5 cm decreased to ≤ 1.0 cm. In addition, abnormally elevated peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 4 x 10^9 /L.~Partial response (PR): ≥ 50% reduction in measurable disease and abnormal lymphocyte count in peripheral blood.~CR or PR had to persist for a period of at least 4 weeks." (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months post-initiation of protocol therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with tumors lacking IRF-4Participants with tumors lacking c-Rel
Induction + Maintenance52

[back to top]

Number of Participants Exhibiting NF-kB Inhibition Upon Treatment With AZT in Vivo

Number of patients exhibiting NF-kb inhibition upon treatment with AZT in vivo. Investigation of whether AZT functions as an inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) in vivo by analyzing serially collected leukemic samples during the first 48 hours of treatment with AZT only. The investigators will report the number of participants exhibiting NF-kB inhibition upon treatment with AZT in vivo and correlate with response using two-sample t-test. (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: During 48 hours of first AZT therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CR with Decrease in NF-kB Complex (p50 complexes)CR with no clear effect NF-kBPR with Decrease in p50, and Increase in p65
Induction (Up to Day 21)111

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is the elapsed time from the date of initiation of study treatment until date of death from any cause. In the absence of death, the follow-up was censored at date of last contact. (NCT00854581)
Timeframe: From date of treatment initiation until date of death, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Induction + Maintenance7.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin0
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin0
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin23
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin22
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin23
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a > or = 3-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Baseline to Week 4

Serum HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Auto assay. The DAO approach was used to handle missing data. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin85

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a > or = 2-log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Baseline to Week 4

Serum HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Auto assay. The DAO approach was used to handle missing data. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin100
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin95

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Viral Response

Rapid viral response (RVR) is defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) at Week 4. Serum HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Auto assay. The limit of quantification was 1.2 log IU/mL (15 IU/mL) and the limit of detection was <1.2 log IU/mL, but with no specific value. The Data-As-Observed (DAO) approach was used to handle missing data. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin86.4
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin95.0
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin76.2
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin20.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HCV RNA in log10 at Week 4

Change from baseline in HCV RNA at Week 4 was calculated by subtracting Week 4 HCV RNA level from Baseline HCV RNA level. HCV RNA is measured as International Units per milliliter (IU/mL). Serum HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Auto assay. The DAO approach was used to handle missing data. (NCT00880763)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,,,
InterventionIU/mL in Log10 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Placebo + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin6.6-4.7
Vaniprevir 1200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin6.6-6.3
Vaniprevir 200 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin6.6-6.5
Vaniprevir 600 mg + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin6.6-6.6

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Overview of Failures

"Failure was defined as the first occurence of confirmed relapse or permanent treatment discontinuation (for any cause) which ever came first. If no events occurred, the participant was considered free of failure.~Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever - was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score or Functional System scores." (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: Core treatment period between 48 and 118 weeks depending on when the participant was enrolled

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
FailureFree of failure
IFN-β-1a4460
Teriflunomide 14 mg4269
Teriflunomide 7 mg5356

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events [AE]

AE are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: from first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the core treatment period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE- Any serious AE- Any AE leading to death- Any AE leading to treatment discontinuation
IFN-β-1a977022
Teriflunomide 14 mg1026012
Teriflunomide 7 mg1031209

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score

"FIS is a subject-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in patients with MS. It consists of 40 statements that measure fatigue in three areas; physical, cognitive, and social.~FIS total score ranges from 0 (no problem) to 160 (extreme problem).~Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures [MMRM] on FIS total score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors)." (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: Baseline (before randomization) and 48 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriflunomide 7 mg0.97
Teriflunomide 14 mg4.10
IFN-β-1a9.10

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR] - Poisson Regression Estimates

"ARR is obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occured during the treatment period divided by the sum of the treatment durations.~To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrollment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates)." (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: Core treatment period between 48 and 118 weeks depending on when the participant was enrolled

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Teriflunomide 7 mg0.410
Teriflunomide 14 mg0.259
IFN-β-1a0.216

[back to top]

Extension Treatment Period: Overview of AEs

AEs were any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: From first intake of study drug in extension treatment period up to 28 days after the last intake in the extension treatment period

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEAny serious AEAny AE leading to deathAny AE leading to treatment discontinuation
IFN-β-1a / 14 mg481205
Teriflunomide 14 mg / 14 mg761306
Teriflunomide 7 mg / 14 mg83908

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM] Scores

TSQM version 1.4 is an instrument to assess patients' satisfaction with medication. It consists of 13 questions that cover three dimensions (effectiveness, side effects and convenience) plus a global satisfaction question. Four scores ranging from 0 to 100 (extremely satisfied) are obtained. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures [MMRM] on TSQM score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as factors). (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Effectivness scoreSide effects scoreConvenience scoreGlobal satisfaction score
IFN-β-1a59.3071.3861.9060.98
Teriflunomide 14 mg63.1393.1589.8568.82
Teriflunomide 7 mg67.2595.2988.3068.29

[back to top]

Extension Treatment Period: ARR Poisson Regression Estimates

"ARR was obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the sum of the standardized treatment durations.To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson Regression Model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates)." (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: Extension treatment period (Maximum: 197 weeks)

Interventionrelapses per year (Number)
Teriflunomide 7 mg / 14 mg0.236
Teriflunomide 14 mg / 14 mg0.193
IFN-β-1a / 14 mg0.252

[back to top]

Core Treatment Period: Time to Failure: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Failure at Timepoints

"Probability of disability progression at 24, 48 and 96 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to failure defined as the time from randomization to failure. Participants free of failure were censored at the date of last treatment.~Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t is 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t." (NCT00883337)
Timeframe: Core treatment period between 48 and 118 weeks depending on when the participant was enrolled

,,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Probability of failure at 24 weeksProbability of failure at 48 weeksProbability of failure at 96 weeks
IFN-β-1a29.836.544.4
Teriflunomide 14 mg24.333.341.1
Teriflunomide 7 mg25.735.858.8

[back to top]

Incidence/Severity of Viral Respiratory Infections

Number of subjects in each group with a confirmed viral respiratory infection and the proportion of subjects reporting a mild vs. moderate to severe infection (NCT00895947)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
incidence of viral respiratory infectionmoderate/severe viral respiratory infectionmoderate/severe influenza infectionmoderate/severe non-influenza infection
Interferon-alpha20514
Placebo2316411

[back to top] [back to top]

Symptom Incidence/Severity

Number of subjects in each group reporting 13 different cold/flu symptoms assessed weekly (NCT00895947)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
any cold/flu symptomsmoderate to severe feverishnessmoderate to severe head congestionmoderate to severe sore throat
Interferon-alpha86122327
Placebo92243639

[back to top]

Acute Respiratory Illness

"Number of subjects in each group meeting definition of acute respiratory illness (ARI), defined as 2 or more cold/flu symptoms reported in the same week. Further defined as febrile or afebrile depending on whether the subject reported the symptom of feverishness." (NCT00895947)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
all acute respiratory illness (ARI)moderate/severe ARImoderate/severe febrile ARImoderate/severe afebrile ARI
Interferon-alpha83411235
Placebo86542431

[back to top]

Frequency of Influenza-like Illness

Number of subjects in each group meeting the definition of influenza-like illness during treatment (i.e. those subject reporting one or more moderate to severe cold/flu symptoms during the treatment period). (NCT00895947)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
OverallAge 50 and overAge under 50Seasonal flu vaccine, yesSeasonal flu vaccine, noGender, MaleGender, Female
Interferon-alpha54163816381143
Placebo62283436262240

[back to top]

Impact of Cold/Flu Symptoms

Number of subjects in each group reporting that cold/flu symptoms impacted the following 9 measures of daily life: ability to (1) think clearly, (2) sleep well, (3) breathe easily, (4) walk, climb stairs and exercise, (5) perform daily tasks, (6) work outside the home, (7) work inside the home, (8) interact with others, and (9) live personal life. (NCT00895947)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
think clearlysleep wellbreathe easilywalk, climb stairs and exerciseperform daily activitieswork outside the homework inside the homeinteract with otherslive personal life
Interferon-alpha535458444643424144
Placebo596461495451515051

[back to top]

Number of New Or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at 1 Year

Number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Data observed after participants switched to alternative MS medications are excluded. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline number of T2 lesions. (NCT00906399)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionlesions (Mean)
Year 1: Placebo10.9
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q4W7.9
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q2W3.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Relapsed at 1 Year

A relapse is defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting for at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurologic findings. Only relapses confirmed by INEC were included in the analysis. Estimated proportion of participants relapsed is based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. (NCT00906399)
Timeframe: Year 1

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Year 1: Placebo0.291
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q4W0.222
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q2W0.187

[back to top]

Estimated Proportion of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression at 1 Year

Sustained disability progression is defined as: at least a 1.0 point increase on the EDSS from baseline EDSS ≥ 1.0 that is sustained for 12 weeks, or at least a 1.5 point increase on the EDSS from baseline EDSS = 0 that is sustained for 12 weeks. The EDSS measures the disability status of people with MS on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10. The range of main categories include 0 (normal neurologic examination), to 5 (ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 meters/disability severe enough to impair full daily activities), to 10 (death due to MS). Estimated proportion of participants with progression based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. (NCT00906399)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Year 1: Placebo0.105
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q4W0.068
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q2W0.068

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at 1 Year

A relapse is defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting for at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurologic findings. Only relapses confirmed by an independent neurology evaluation committee (INEC) are included in the analysis. Data after participants switched to alternative multiple sclerosis (MS) medications are excluded. Data were analyzed using negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (< 4 versus ≥ 4), baseline age (< 40 versus ≥ 40 years), and baseline relapse rate (number of relapses in 3 years prior to study entry divided by 3). (NCT00906399)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionrelapses per person-years (Number)
Year 1: Placebo0.397
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q4W0.288
Year 1: Peginterferon Beta-1a Q2W0.256

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The survival time for each patient is defined as the time between randomization and death. Patients lost to follow-up or still alive at the date of last evaluation have been censored. (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg9.3
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg8.6
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg10.3
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg9.3
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha6.6

[back to top]

Overall Tumor Response

Tumor response is measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) computing number of Complete Response plus Partial Response (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg7
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg10
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg6
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg12
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival is defined as the time from the randomization to progression or death (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg1.9
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg1.8
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg1.8
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg2.0
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha1.8

[back to top]

Early Virologic Response (EVR)

(NCT00919633)
Timeframe: Study week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group 4: Peginterferon Alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg)7
Group 1: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 1)15
Group 2: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 2)13
Group 3: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 3)11

[back to top]

Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

(NCT00919633)
Timeframe: Study Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group 4: Peginterferon Alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg)2
Group 1: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 1)4
Group 2: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 2)7
Group 3: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 3)11

[back to top]

Viral Load: Incidence of Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

(NCT00919633)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after treatment is complete

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group 4: Peginterferon Alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg)4
Group 1: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 1)7
Group 2: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 2)2
Group 3: Interferon Alfa-2b (Dose 3)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT00943761)
Timeframe: up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV21
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV23

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Serious Adverse Event

Serious adverse event is defined as any adverse drug or biologic or device experience occurring at any dose resulting in death, was life-threatening, was persistent or caused significant disability/incapacity, required in-patient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, was a cancer, or was an overdose. (NCT00943761)
Timeframe: up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV4
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT00943761)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV2
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR24)

SVR24 is defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) 24 weeks after the end of vaniprevir study therapy. HCV RNA plasma levels were assessed using the Roche COBAS Taqman assay (or equivalent) with the limit of quantification (LoQ) of at least 25 IU/mL and the limit of detection (LoD) of at least 10 IU/mL. (NCT00943761)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vaniprevir 300 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV66.7
Vaniprevir 600 mg b.i.d. + Peg-IFN + RBV70.6

[back to top]

t1/2,ss for BI 201335 ZW

terminal half-life of the analyte in plasma at steady state (t1/2,ss) (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionhour(s) (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN29.3
BI 201335 NA High TN21.2
BI 201335 NA High TE23.0

[back to top]

Tmax for BI 201335 ZW

Time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of BI 201335 ZW after the first dose of BI 201335 NA with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the first dose

Interventionhour(s) (Median)
BI 201335 NA Low TN4.98
BI 201335 NA High TN5.50
BI 201335 NA High TE7.97

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Possible Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Standard of Care (SOC) With PegIFN α-2a and RBV

Frequency of patients with possible clinically significant abnormalities or clinically significant laboratory test value changes over time in SOC period for treatment naive patients and treatment experienced patients. (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipant(s) (Number)
Decrease haematocritDecrease haemoglobinDecrease red blood cell ct.Decrease white blood cell ct.Decrease plateletsIncrease eosinophilsDecrease sodiumDecrease potassiumIncrease bicarbonateIncrease uric acidIncrease triglycerideIncrease U. pHIncrease AST/GOT, SGOTIncrease ALT/GPT, SGPT
SOC TE 240 mg45330100002011
SOC TN 120 mg32351000100211
SOC TN 240 mg52450111000000
SOC TN Placebo14030010011000

[back to top]

Tmax for RBV

Time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of RBV after the first dose of BI 201335 NA with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the first dose

Interventionhour(s) (Median)
Placebo TN1.94
BI 201335 NA Low TN3.98
BI 201335 NA High TN3.92
BI 201335 NA High TE4.98

[back to top]

Tmax, ss for BI 201335 ZW

Time from last dosing to the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of BI 201335 ZW after the last dose of BI 201335 NA with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionhour(s) (Median)
BI 201335 NA Low TN3.83
BI 201335 NA High TN2.99
BI 201335 NA High TE3.49

[back to top]

Tmax, ss for RBV

Time to the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of RBV after the last dose of BI 201335 NA with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionhour(s) (Median)
Placebo TN2.42
BI 201335 NA Low TN2.92
BI 201335 NA High TN2.90
BI 201335 NA High TE3.92

[back to top]

Week 2 Virological Response (W2VR)

Number of patients satisfying W2VR (plasma HCV RNA (Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic acid) level below the limit of quantification (BLQ)) (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo in TN0
BI 201335 NA Low TN5
BI 201335 NA High TN6
BI 201335 NA High TE3

[back to top]

Week 4 Virological Response (W4VR)

Number of patients satisfying W4VR (plasma HCV RNA level below the limit of quantification (BLQ)) (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN0
BI 201335 NA Low TN6
BI 201335 NA High TN6
BI 201335 NA High TE5

[back to top]

Assessment of Tolerability in Standard of Care (SOC) With PegIFN α -2a and RBV

An assessment of tolerability for the safety of the SOC with PegIFN alfa-2a and RBV. (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipant(s) (Number)
GoodSatisfactoryNot satisfactoryBad
SOC TE 240 mg3120
SOC TN 120 mg4010
SOC TN 240 mg1212
SOC TN Placebo2200

[back to top]

Assessment of Tolerability in Triple Combination Therapy

An assessment of tolerability for the safety of the triple combination therapy with BI 201335 NA, PegIFN α -2a and RBV. (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
GoodSatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryBad
Triple TE 240 mg6000
Triple TN 120 mg5100
Triple TN 240 mg5100
Triple TN Placebo3010

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Possible Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Triple Combination Therapy

Frequency of patients with possible clinically significant abnormalities or clinically significant laboratory test value changes over time in triple combination therapy for treatment naive patients and treatment experienced patients. (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decrease HaematocritDecrease HaemoglobinDecrease Red blood cell ct.Decrease White blood cell ct.Decrease PlateletsIncrease EosinophilsDecrease SodiumDecrease PotassiumDecrease BicarbonateIncrease BicarbonateIncrease Bilirubin, totalIncrease Bilirubin, directIncrease Protein, totalIncrease Uric acidIncrease TriglycerideIncrease U. pH
Triple TE 240 mg4424001012540140
Triple TN 120 mg2324102012210201
Triple TN 240 mg3225012101631010
Triple TN Placebo2312001001000200

[back to top]

CL/F,ss for BI 201335 ZW

apparent clearance of the analyte (BI 201335 ZW) in plasma at steady state (CL/F,ss) following multiple oral administration (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN28.2
BI 201335 NA High TN11.1
BI 201335 NA High TE8.01

[back to top]

AUCτ,1 for BI 201335 ZW

Area under the curve (AUC) concentration after the first dose of BI 201335 ZW (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the first dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN68900
BI 201335 NA High TN171000
BI 201335 NA High TE233000

[back to top]

AUCτ,1 for Ribavirin (RBV)

Area under the plasma concentration curve of RBV after the first dose of placebo or BI 201335 NA with with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: -0:10, 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11:50, 23:50 hours on the first dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN5160
BI 201335 NA Low TN4660
BI 201335 NA High TN4620
BI 201335 NA High TE3500

[back to top]

AUCτ,ss of BI 201335 ZW

AUC at steady state after 4 weeks combination of the last dose (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN70800
BI 201335 NA High TN361000
BI 201335 NA High TE499000

[back to top]

AUCτ,ss of RBV

Area under the plasma concentration curve of RBV after the multiple oral administration of BI 201335 NA (or placebo) with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: -0:10, 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11:50, 23:50 hours on the last dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN27500
BI 201335 NA Low TN25200
BI 201335 NA High TN22400
BI 201335 NA High TE20000

[back to top]

Cavg for BI 201335 ZW

average plasma concentration (Cavg) of BI 201335 ZW (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN2950
BI 201335 NA High TN15000
BI 201335 NA High TE20800

[back to top]

Cavg for RBV

average plasma concentration (Cavg) of RBV (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN2290
BI 201335 NA Low TN2100
BI 201335 NA High TN1860
BI 201335 NA High TE1670

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HCV Viral Load

Change form baseline in HCV viral load (log10) after 4 weeks (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: baseline and week 4

InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Placebo TN-3.30
BI 201335 NA Low TN-5.88
BI 201335 NA High TN-5.95
BI 201335 NA High TE-5.53

[back to top]

Cmax of BI 201335 ZW

Maximum concentration of BI 201335 ZW after multiple oral admin. of BI 201335 NA with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the first dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN5500
BI 201335 NA High TN12600
BI 201335 NA High TE15000

[back to top]

Cmax of RBV

Maximum Plasma concentration of RBV after multiple oral admin. of placebo with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: -0:10, 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11:50, 23:50 hours on the first dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN1130
BI 201335 NA Low TN761
BI 201335 NA High TN724
BI 201335 NA High TE509

[back to top]

Cmax,ss of BI 201335 ZW

Maximum concentration of BI 201335 ZW at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN5880
BI 201335 NA High TN24500
BI 201335 NA High TE29100

[back to top]

Cmax,ss of RBV

Maximum Plasma concentration of RBV after multiple oral admin. of BI 201335 NA (or placebo) with RBV and PegIFN alfa-2a at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: -0:10, 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11:50, 23:50 hours on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN3060
BI 201335 NA Low TN2710
BI 201335 NA High TN2280
BI 201335 NA High TE2130

[back to top]

Cmin,ss for BI 201335 ZW

Minimum concentration of the analyte (BI 201335 ZW) in plasma over the dosing interval at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BI 201335 NA Low TN1550
BI 201335 NA High TN10200
BI 201335 NA High TE16000

[back to top]

Cmin,ss for RBV

Minimum concentration of the analyte (RBV) in plasma over the dosing interval at steady state (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h),2h,3h,4h,5h,6h,8h,10h,11:50h, 23:50h on the last dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo TN1980
BI 201335 NA Low TN1730
BI 201335 NA High TN1590
BI 201335 NA High TE1400

[back to top]

Complete Early Virological Response (cEVR)

Number of patients with plasma HCV RNA level BLD at Week 12 (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN3
BI 201335 NA Low TN5
BI 201335 NA High TN5
BI 201335 NA High TE6

[back to top]

Day 28 Virologic Response

Number of patients with HCV viral load reduction >= 2 log10 at Week 4 (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN3
BI 201335 NA Low TN6
BI 201335 NA High TN6
BI 201335 NA High TE6

[back to top]

Early Virological Response (EVR)

Number of patients with reduction >= 2 log10 in plasma HCV RNA level at Week 12 (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN4
BI 201335 NA Low TN5
BI 201335 NA High TN6
BI 201335 NA High TE6

[back to top]

End of Treatment Response (ETR)

Number of patients with plasma HCV RNA level BLD at week 48 (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN3
BI 201335 NA Low TN5
BI 201335 NA High TN4
BI 201335 NA High TE4

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Rapid Virological Response (RVR)

Number of patients satisfying RVR (plasma HCV RNA level below the limit of detection (BLD) at Week 4) (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN0
BI 201335 NA Low TN5
BI 201335 NA High TN6
BI 201335 NA High TE4

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

Number of patients with plasma HCV RNA level BLD 24 weeks after treatment completion (NCT00947349)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo TN2
BI 201335 NA Low TN4
BI 201335 NA High TN5
BI 201335 NA High TE3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HCV Virologic Breakthrough or Incomplete Virologic Response/Rebound

Virologic breakthrough is defined as achieving undetectable HCV-RNA and subsequently having an HCV-RNA level of >1000 IU/mL. Incomplete Virologic Response/Rebound is defined as having a one log10 increase in HCV-RNA from the participant's nadir, with an HCV-RNA >1000 IU/mL. HCV-RNA was detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Virologic breakthroughIncomplete response
PegIFN-2b + RBV017.6
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir6.39.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in log10 HCV-RNA at Treatment Week 4 (TW4)

This is a measure of the change in the amount of HCV-RNA in the plasma at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. HCV-RNA was detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with <1 positive log dropParticipants with >= 1 positive log dropParticipants with undetectable HCV-RNAParticipants with missing data
PegIFN-2b + RBV151630
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir283231

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Randomized Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Boceprevir (Experimental) or Placebo (Control)

SVR24 is defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA 24 weeks after the end of all study treatment. If there was no value in the FW24 visit window, the closest value available chronologically after this window was used; if a value was still missing after that, the value from FW12 was used. HCV-RNA is detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PegIFN-2b + RBV30.3
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir64.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Viral Response (SVR) at Follow-up Week 24 (FW24) Among Randomized Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Trial Medication

SVR24 is defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after the end of all study treatment. If there was no value in the FW24 visit window, the closest value available chronologically after this window was used; if a value was still missing after that, the value from Follow-up Week 12 (FW12) was used. HCV-RNA is detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PegIFN-2b + RBV29.4
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir62.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR) Who Achieved SVR24

EVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at Treatment Week (TW) 2, 4, 8, or 12. HCV-RNA was detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HCV-RNA undetectable at Week 2 (n=0, 0)HCV-RNA undetectable at Week 4 (n=3, 3)HCV-RNA undetectable at Week 8 (n=5, 27)HCV-RNA undetectable at Week 12 (n=8, 38)
PegIFN-2b + RBV010010087.5
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir010092.692.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 12 (FW12)

The virologic response at FW12 was considered SVR12 with an additional rule for handling missing data: participants with missing HCV-RNA assessment at FW12 but having non-missing, undetectable HCV-RNA assessments at both FW4 and FW24, were assumed to be responders for SVR12. HCV-RNA was detected by a nucleic acid amplification test and the lower limit of detection for this assay is 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT00959699)
Timeframe: Up to Week 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PegIFN-2b + RBV26.5
PegIFN-2b + RBV + Boceprevir62.5

[back to top]

Time to Reach a Plasma HCV RNA Level BLD While on Treatment

Time to reach a plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) while on treatment (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionweek (Median)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)4.1
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)4.1

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Abnormalities and Study Medication Tolerabilities

Participants with possible clinically significant laboratory test abnormalities observed in functional groups: Haematology, Coagulation, Electrolytes, Enzymes, Substrates and Differentials, automatic. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Red blood cell count: low (N=81, N=79)haematocrit: low (N=81, N=79)haematocrit: high(N=81, N=79)white blood cell count: low(N=81, N=79)platelets: low(N=81, N=78)eosinophils: high (N=81, N=79)PT-INR: high (N=81, N=79)sodium: low (N=81, N=79)bicarbonate: low (N=79, N=74)bicarbonate: high (N=79, N=74)AST/GOT, SGOT: high (N=75, N=71)ALT/GPT, SGPT: high (N=68, N=64)alkaline phosphatase: high (N=80, N=79)GGT: high (N=74, N=72)creatine kinase: high (N=80, N=79)lipase: high (N=79, N=79)amylase: high (N=81, N=79)glucose: low (N=80, N=79)cholesterol, total: high (N=80, N=75)triglyceride: high (N=74, N=71)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)93005651116133140110613
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)821160251111135083322218

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities Vital Signs, and Physical Examination

No number of participants with clinically relevant abnormalities in vital signs and physical examination. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants with abnormality (Number)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)0
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)0

[back to top]

Viral Load (HCV RNA) at All Visits During Treatment and Follow-up

Viral load of Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) at all visits during treatment (TRT) and follow-up, ie. change from baseline viral load at all visits. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: From baseline to 72 weeks

,
InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
week 2, change from baseline (N=76, N=78)week 4, change from baseline (N=76, N=77)week 8, change from baseline (N=75, N=76)week 12, change from baseline (N=76, N=76)week 16, change from baseline (N=18, N=13)week 20, change from baseline (N=52, N=57)week 24, change from baseline (N=12, N=8)week 28, change from baseline (N=4, N=4)week 36, change from baseline (N=4, N=2)End of TRT, change from baseline (N=80, N=78)4 wks after TRT, change from baseline (N=75, N=77)12 wks after TRT, change from baseline (N=75,N=75)24 wks after TRT, change from baseline (N=73,N=75)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)-4.724-4.993-5.128-5.117-5.363-5.056-4.176-5.723-5.624-4.910-4.296-4.154-4.103
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)-4.866-5.081-5.088-5.107-5.262-5.366-4.740-4.369-5.958-5.017-4.367-4.353-4.250

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (6)

Change from baseline (CFB) in PT-INR (ratio). (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
PT-INR (ratio), CFB, Day 1(N=77, N=72)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk4(N=74, N=76)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk8(N=73, N=75)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk12(N=74, N=72)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk18(N=69, N=70)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk24(N=12, N=4)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk28(N=5, N=3)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, wk36(N=4, N=2)PT-INR (ratio), CFB, EoT(N=68, N=73)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0-0.10.00.0
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.0-0.10.0

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (5)

Change from baseline (CFB) in AST/GOT, ALT/GPT, Alka. phosphatase, GGT, Creatine kinase, Lipase, and Amylase. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, Day 1(N=74, N=75)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=78)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=76)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=76)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk12 (N=74, N=76)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk18 (N=67, N=70)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)AST/GOT (U/L), CFB, EoT (N=66, N=71)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, day1 (N=76, N=75)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=78)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=77)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=76)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk12 (N=74, N=76)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk18 (N=67, N=70)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)ALT/GPT (U/L), CFB, EoT (N=66, N=71)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, day1 (n=77, N=75)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk2 (n=76, N=78)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk4 (n=76, N=77)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk8 (n=75, N=76)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk12 (n=75, N=76)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk18 (n=68, N=70)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk24 (n=12, N=4)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk28 (n=5, N=3)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, wk36 (n=4, N=2)Alka. phosphatase (U/L), CFB, EoT (n=67, N=73)GGT (U/L), CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk4 (N=76, N=77)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=76)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk12 (N=75, N=76)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk18 (N=68, N=70)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)GGT (U/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)GGT (U/L), CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, day1 (N=76, N=75)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=78)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=77)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=76)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk12 (N=74, N=75)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk18 (N=67, N=70)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Creatine kinase (U/L), CFB, EoT (N=66, N=71)Lipase (U/L). CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk4 (N=76, N=76)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=76)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk12 (N=75, N=75)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk18 (N=68, N=70)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Lipase (U/L). CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Lipase (U/L). CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)Amylase (U/L), CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk4 (N=76, N=77)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=76)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk12 (N=75, N=75)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk18 (N=68, N=70)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Amylase (U/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Amylase (U/L), CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)0-24-25-22-24-25-23-20-21-251-37-37-36-37-41-40-45-47-4215775-2-14-2-51-5-34-59-76-71-62-118-52-23-39-2-59-69-92-98-93-69-48-68-89-25-1-11-12-132-1-4-6152-5-10-7-14-21-350
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)-5-29-29-27-27-30-10-1611-27-2-34-34-35-36-42-24-22-6-4217109651315185-5-38-60-70-69-64-131-113-14-5930-41-62-75-84-60-42-32-37-21269624-4-170-15-5735-2-4-7-16-8-19-4

[back to top]

End of Treatment Response (ETR)

End of Treatment Response (ETR): The patients who reached plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at end of all therapy. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: up to 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)65
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)67

[back to top]

Rapid Virological Response at Week 4 (RVR)

Rapid virological response at week 4 (RVR): The patients who reached plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at week 4. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)48
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)56

[back to top]

Virological Response at Week 24 (W24VR)

virological response at week 24 (W24VR): The patients who reached plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at week 24. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)59
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)63

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (4)

Change from baseline (CFB) in Sodium, Bicarbonate, Cholesterol total, Triglyceride, and Glucose. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, Day 1(N=77, N=74)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk4 (N=76, N=77)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk8 (N=73, N=76)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk12 (N=75, N=76)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk18 (N=68, N=70)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Sodium (mmol/L) CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, day1 (N=76, N=75)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=78)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=77)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=76)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk12 (N=74, N=76)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk18 (N=66, N=69)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk28 (N=4, N=3)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Bicarbonate (mmol/L), CFB, EoT (N=64, N=71)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, day1 (n=77, N=75)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk2 (n=76, N=78)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk4 (n=76, N=77)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk8 (n=75, N=76)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk12 (n=75, N=76)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk18 (n=68, N=70)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk24 (n=12, N=4)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk28 (n=5, N=3)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, wk36 (n=4, N=2)Cholesterol tot. (mmol/L), CFB, EoT (n=67, N=73)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk2 (N=76, N=78)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk4 (N=76, N=77)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=76)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk12 (N=75, N=76)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk18 (N=68, N=70)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Triglyceride (mmol/L), CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, day1 (N=76, N=75)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=78)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=77)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=76)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk12 (N=73, N=76)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk18 (N=67, N=70)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk28 (N=5, N=3)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Glucose (mmol/L), CFB, EoT (N=66, N=71)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)000100-1-2-100.1-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.3-0.4-1.2-2.6-0.20.03-0.48-0.51-0.58-0.64-0.51-0.360.10-0.35-0.43-0.10.10.10.10.10.0-0.20.0-0.30.1-0.1-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.3-0.4-0.7-0.4-0.1-0.4
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)1001100-1-100.20.0-0.10.0-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.2-1.0-0.1-0.05-0.54-0.67-0.60-0.74-0.80-0.37-0.09-0.23-0.74-0.10.10.20.10.10.20.20.40.10.10.20.10.10.1-0.1-0.1-0.40.1-0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (3)

Change from baseline (CFB) in Platelets and white blood cells. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
Platelets CFB, Day 1 (N=77, N=73)Platelets CFB, wk2 (N=74, N=74)Platelets CFB, wk4 (N=73, N=74)Platelets CFB, wk8 (N=73, N=71)Platelets CFB, wk12 (N=72, N=72)Platelets CFB, wk18 (N=66, N=68)Platelets CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=3)Platelets CFB, wk28 (N=4, N=2)Platelets CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Platelets CFB, EoT (N=67, N=71)white blood cell CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)white blood cell CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=77)white blood cell CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=76)white blood cell CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=74)white blood cell CFB, wk12 (N=74, N=74)white blood cell CFB, wk18 (N=66, N=69)white blood cell CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)white blood cell CFB, wk28 (N=4, N=3)white blood cell CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)white blood cell CFB, EoT (N=67, N=73)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)3-35-35-55-61-55-46-22-47-59-0.1-2.2-2.6-3.2-3.4-3.2-4.0-2.8-2.5-3.4
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)2-35-39-48-50-51-50-83-85-500.3-1.8-2.6-2.9-2.8-3.1-2.0-1.9-3.0-3.1

[back to top]

Sustained Virological Response (SVR24) at 24 Weeks After Completion of All Therapy

Sustained Virological Response (SVR24) at 24 weeks: The patients who reached plasma Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at 24 weeks after completion of all Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)54
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)58

[back to top]

Virological Response at Week 28 (W28VR)

Virological response at Week 28: The patients who reached plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at Week 28. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)61
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)60

[back to top]

Virological Response at Week 36 (W36VR)

Virological response at week 36 (W36VR): the patients who reached plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level below the lower limit of detection (BLD) at week 36. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Faldaprevir 120 mg (12 Weeks)55
Faldaprevir 120 mg (24 Weeks)58

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (2)

Change from baseline (CFB) in haematocrit and Eosinophils. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
Intervention% of laboratory test substance (Mean)
haematocrit (%) CFB, Day1 (N=77, N=75)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=77)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk4 (N=74, N=76)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk8 (N=75, N=74)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk12 (N=72, N=74)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk18 (N=66, N=69)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk24 (N=11, N=4)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk28 (N=4, N=3)haematocrit (%) CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)haematocrit (%) CFB, EoT (N=66, N=70)Eosinophils(%), CFB, day1 (N=77, N=75)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk2 (N=75, N=76)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk4 (N=73, N=74)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk8 (N=74, N=73)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk12 (N=72, N=72)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk18 (N=62, N=65)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk24 (N=12, N=4)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk28 (N=4, N=3)Eosinophils(%), CFB, wk36 (N=4, N=2)Eosinophils(%), CFB, EoT (N=66, N=70)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)-0.9-4.3-8.0-8.4-8.5-7.3-6.6-3.8-3.0-6.000-1000-1-1-10
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)-1.3-4.7-7.9-7.1-7.8-6.5-2.7-1.2-3.6-6.0000000-1-2-11

[back to top]

Laboratory Test Value Changes Over Time for Selected Lab Test Parameters (1)

Change from baseline (CFB) in Red blood cells. (NCT00984620)
Timeframe: baseline and 48 weeks

,
Intervention10^12 cells/L (Mean)
Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB,Day 1(N=77,N=75)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk2 (N=75,N=77)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk4(N=74, N=76)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk8(N=75, N=74)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk12(N=74,N=74)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk18(N=66,N=69)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk24(N=12, N=4)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk28(N=4, N=3)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, wk36(N=4, N=2)Red blood cell (10^12cells/L) CFB, EoT(N=67, N=73)
Faldaprevir 120mg (12 Weeks)0.0-0.3-0.8-1.0-1.1-1.2-1.2-1.1-0.9-1.2
Faldaprevir 120mg (24 Weeks)-0.1-0.4-0.8-1.0-1.2-1.2-0.9-0.9-1.4-1.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Study Entry

HOMA-IR was calculated as [fasting glucose (mg/dL) x fasting insulin (uIU/mL)]/405. Percent Change in HOMA-IR was calculated as HOMA-IR at later time point (16, 28, 52, 76) minus HOMA-IR at study entry, divided by HOMA-IR at study entry x 100%. Study protocol required fasting for at least 8 hours (nothing by mouth except medications and water) prior to specimen collection for fasting insulin and fasting glucose testing. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 16, 28, 52, and 76

Interventionpercentage of HOMA-IR at study entry (Median)
Percent change in HOMA-IR at Week 16 (n=56)Percent change in HOMA-IR at Week 28 (n=39)Percent change in HOMA-IR at Week 52 (n=27)Percent change in HOMA-IR at Week 76 (n=22)
NTZ/PEG/RBV-13.0-6.323.29.5

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin Level From Study Entry

Change in hemoglobin (HGB) was calculated as HGB at later time point (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76) minus HGB at study entry. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76.

Interventiong/dL (Median)
Change in HGB at Week 4Change in HGB at Week 8Change in HGB at Week 12Change in HGB at Week 16Change in HGB at Week 20Change in HGB at Week 24Change in HGB at Week 28Change in HGB at Week 32Change in HGB at Week 36Change in HGB at Week 40Change in HGB at Week 44Change in HGB at Week 48Change in HGB at Week 52Change in HGB at Week 76
NTZ/PEG/RBV-0.1-2.1-2.5-2.5-2.5-2.4-2.5-2.7-2.5-2.6-2.6-2.7-2.9-0.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 2 or Higher

Number of participants who experienced an adverse event of Grade 2 or higher at any time after study entry. Grading of adverse events (signs and symptoms and laboratory toxicities) was according to Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, December 2004. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: From study entry to up to week 76

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV65

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HCV Genotype 1

Confirmatory HCV genotyping was performed on stored plasma from entry using VERSANT HCV Genotype assay v2.0 (LiPA, RUO, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY). (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Week 0

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV67

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

Complete early virologic response (cEVR) was defined as undetectable HCV viral load (<43 IU/ml) at week 16, where 43 is the lower limit of quantification of the assay (Cobas AmpliPrep/Taqman HCV Test). (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV38.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR)

Early virologic response (EVR) was defined as undetectable HCV viral load (<43 IU/ml) at Week 16 or at least a 2-log10 decrease in HCV viral load from study entry at Week 16, where 43 is the lower limit of quantification of the assay (Cobas AmpliPrep/Taqman HCV Test). (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV65.7

[back to top]

Percent Change in Fasting Insulin Level From Study Entry

Percent Change in fasting insulin (FINS) was calculated as FINS at later time point (16, 28, 52, 76) minus FINS at study entry, divided by FINS at study entry x 100%. Study protocol required fasting for at least 8 hours (nothing by mouth except medications and water) prior to specimen collection for fasting insulin testing. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 16, 28, 52, and 76

Interventionpercentage of FINS at study entry (Median)
Percent change in FINS at Week 16Percent change in FINS at Week 28Percent change in FINS at Week 52Percent change in FINS at Week 76
NTZ/PEG/RBV08.828.28.3

[back to top]

Change in log10 HCV Viral Load After 4 Weeks of Nitazoxanide (NTZ) Monotherapy.

Change in log10 HCV viral load was calculated as log10-transformed HCV viral load at Week 4 minus log10-transformed HCV viral load at study entry. HCV viral load testing was done using Cobas AmpliPrep/Taqman HCV Test. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4

Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Median)
NTZ/PEG/RBV-0.12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

Sustained virologic response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV viral load (<43 IU/ml) at 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation, where 43 is the lower limit of quantification of the assay (Cobas AmpliPrep/Taqman HCV Test). Participants who failed to achieve EVR or had detectable HCV RNA at Week 28 and per protocol discontinued study, and participants without HCV RNA from 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation, were considered non-responders. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV32.8

[back to top]

Percent Change in Fasting Glucose Level From Study Entry

Percent Change in fasting glucose (FGLUC) was calculated as FGLUC at later time point (16, 28, 52, 76) minus FGLUC at study entry, divided by FGLUC at study entry x 100%. Study protocol required fasting for at least 8 hours (nothing by mouth except medications and water) prior to specimen collection for fasting glucose testing. (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 16, 28, 52, and 76

Interventionpercentage of FGLUC at study entry (Median)
Percent change in FGLUC at Week 16Percent change in FGLUC at Week 28Percent change in FGLUC at Week 52Percent change in FGLUC at Week 76
NTZ/PEG/RBV-3.2-5.31.10

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

Rapid virologic response (RVR) was defined as undetectable HCV viral load (<43 IU/ml) at Week 8 where 43 is the lower limit of quantification of the assay (Cobas AmpliPrep/Taqman HCV Test). (NCT00991289)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
NTZ/PEG/RBV10.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

The table below shows the percentage of participants who had a Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR) (ie, those with undetectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA values of <25 IU/mL, target not detected at at Weeks 4 and 12 of treatment). (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder34.4
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder72.7
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser85.2
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed During Follow-Up

The table below shows the percentage of participants who relapsed (ie, those having confirmed detectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA] during the 24-week follow-up period after previous HCV RNA <25 IU/mL, target not detected, at end of treatment). (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: During Follow-Up (24 weeks after the last dose of study drug, administerd at 48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder21.4
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder5.3
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser4.0
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR28.6

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Last Dose of Study Drug (SVR24 Actual)

The table below shows the percentage of participants acheiving a SVR 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug defined as having plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels < 25 IU/mL, target not detected at end of treatment (EOT) AND the participant did not relapse AND the participant completed the treatment; OR if the participant had plasma HCV RNA levels of < 25 IU/mL, target not detected at EOT AND the participant did not relapse AND the participant prematurely discontinued at least one study medication, but never for the reason virologic failure. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: End of trial (24 weeks after last dose, administerd at 48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants with response (Number)
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder34.4
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder72.7
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser81.5
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR44.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Log 10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Level

The table below shows change from baseline in log 10 plasma HCV RNA values measured over time. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,,
Interventionlog 10 IU/ml (Median)
Week 4 (n=32, 22, 26, and 9)Week 8 (n=32, 22, 26, and 9)Week 12 (n=31, 22, 26, 9)Week 24 (n=23, 20, 24, and 8)Week 36 (n=18, 19, 23, and 7)Week 48 (n=15, 16, 21, and 7)
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR-5.55-5.96-5.96-5.87-6.07-6.07
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder-5.39-5.51-5.40-5.89-5.95-6.03
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder-5.83-5.88-5.88-5.72-5.86-5.88
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser-5.59-5.62-5.62-5.75-5.78-5.71

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Met a Virologic Stopping Rule That Required Them to Permanently Discontinue Telaprevir and Continue Pegylated Interferon (Peg-IFN) and Ribavirin (RBV) at Week 4 or Week 8

The table below shows the percentage of participants at Week 4 or 8 who met a stopping rule defined as having a hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) value >100 IU/mL. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder28.1
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder4.5
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser3.7
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR11.1

[back to top]

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values Over Time

The table below shows plasma Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) values measured over time. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

,,,
InterventionLog 10 IU/mL (Median)
Baseline (n=32, 22, 27, and 9)Week 4 (n=32, 22, 26, and 9)Week 8 (n=32, 22, 26, and 9)Week 12 (n=31, 22, 26, and 9)Week 24 (n=23, 20, 26, and 8)Week 36 (n=18, 19, 23, and 7)Week 48 (n=16, 16, 21, and 7)
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR6.761.240.700.700.700.700.70
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder6.631.240.700.700.700.700.70
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder6.720.700.700.700.700.700.70
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser6.480.700.700.700.700.700.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Met a Virologic Stopping Rule That Required Them to Permanently Discontinue All Study Drugs at Week 12, 24, or 36

The table below shows the percentage of participants at Week 12, 24, and 36 who met a stopping rule. The stopping rule at Week 12 was having hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) value of >100 IU/mL and the stopping rule at Weeks 24 or 36 was having a HCV RNA value of >=25 IU/mL. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Week 12 or Weeks 24 or 36

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24Week 36
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR11.111.10
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder31.29.49.4
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder4.59.10
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser03.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough

The table below shows the percentage of participants with viral breakthrough defined as a confirmed increase >1 log10 in hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) level from the lowest level reached during the considered treatment phase up to the considered time point, if the lowest level reached is > 25 IU/mL, or a confirmed value of HCV RNA >100 IU/mL in participants whose HCV RNA had previously become <25 IU/mL (detected or target not detected) during the considered treatment phase. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Week 48 (Period After Telaprevir Intake) and Week 12 (Telaprevir Treatment Phase)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 48 (Period After Telaprevir Intake)Week 12 (Telaprevir Treatment Phase)
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR11.111.1
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder25.015.6
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder9.14.5
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser3.70.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

The table below shows the percentage of participants who had a rapid virologic response (RVR) (ie, those with undetectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA values of <25 IU/mL, target not detected at Week 4 of treatment). (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder37.5
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder77.3
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser85.2
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR33.3

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values of Less Than 25 IU/ml, Target Not Detected at Different Time Points

The table below shows the percentage of participants with undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels of less than 25 IU/ml, target not detected at different time points during the study. Data was imputed for participants with missing values using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method for missing values. (NCT01054573)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48, and at the end of treatment (Week 48 or at time of early discontinuation)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants with response (Number)
BaslineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 24Week 36Week 48End of Treatment
Phase 1: T12(Q8h)/PR033.366.766.766.777.877.877.8
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Null Responder037.556.359.450.043.843.843.8
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Partial Responder077.386.490.977.381.872.786.4
Phase 3: T12(Q8h)/PR - Prior Relapser085.292.692.685.285.285.292.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event; however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also have been any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the subject or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. See Adverse Events section below for further details. (NCT01058005)
Timeframe: up to 108 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Natalizumab1
Interferon Beta-1a1
Glatiramer Acetate0

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Relapse-free at Week 144

Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. Only relapses confirmed by INEC are included in this analysis. Data after participants switched to alternative MS medications are excluded. The estimated proportion of subjects relapse-free at Week 144 is based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. (NCT01064401)
Timeframe: 144 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.508
Daclizumab High Yield Process0.673

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 7.5 Point Worsening From Baseline in the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score at 96 Weeks

The MSIS-29 is a 29-item disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure that has been developed and validated to examine the physical and psychological impact of MS from a patient's perspective; it measures physical and psychological items. Worsening in the MSIS-29 physical score is defined as an increase of ≥ 7.5 points in the MSIS-29 physical score at 96 weeks compared to baseline. If a participant was missing data for less than 10 of the 20 items that make up the physical score, then the mean of the non-missing items were used for the missing items. If a participant was missing 10 or more of the 20 items that make up the physical score, or missing the questionnaire entirely, or if the questionnaire was completed after the participant switched to alternative MS medication, a random effects model was used to estimate the MSIS-29 physical score. (NCT01064401)
Timeframe: Baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a23
Daclizumab High Yield Process19

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions up to Week 96

The quantity of lesions is assessed by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The adjusted mean number is estimated from a negative binomial regression model, adjusted for baseline volume of T2 from a negative binomial regression model, adjusted for baseline volume of T2 hyperintense lesions, history of prior IFN beta use and baseline age (≤ 35 vs > 35 years). To account for the timing of the MRI measurement, the logarithmic transformation of the scan number of the MRI assessment is included in the model as the 'offset' parameter. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications are excluded. Missing data are not imputed. Only observed new or newly enlarging T2 lesions at the last visit of the participant up to Week 96 visit are used in this analysis. (NCT01064401)
Timeframe: up to 96 weeks

Interventionlesions (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a9.44
Daclizumab High Yield Process4.31

[back to top]

Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. Only relapses confirmed by Independent Neurology Evaluation Committee (INEC) are included in this analysis. Adjusted ARR was estimated from a negative binomial regression model adjusted for the baseline relapse rate, history of prior IFN beta use, baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS; ≤ 2.5 vs > 2.5) and baseline age (≤ 35 vs > 35 years). Data after participants switched to alternative MS medications are excluded. (NCT01064401)
Timeframe: Up to 144 weeks

Interventionrelapses per person-years (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.393
Daclizumab High Yield Process0.216

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression at 144 Weeks

Sustained disability progression is defined as: at least a 1.0-point increase on the EDSS from Baseline EDSS ≥ 1.0 that is sustained for 12 weeks, or at least a 1.5-point increase on the EDSS from baseline EDSS = 0 that is sustained for 12 weeks. The EDSS measures the disability status of people with MS on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Estimated proportion of participants with progression is based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Participants were censored at the time of withdrawal/switch if they withdrew from study or switched to alternative MS medication without a progression. Participants with a tentative progression at the End of Treatment Period Visit (or the last EDSS assessment prior to alternative MS start date) and no confirmation assessment were censored at their last EDSS assessment. (NCT01064401)
Timeframe: Baseline through 144 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.203
Daclizumab High Yield Process0.162

[back to top]

Time Course to Return of Radiological and/or Clinical Evidence of Multiple Sclerosis Activity, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Met Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Clinical Relapse Rescue Criteria.

Rescue criteria were: 1) central reader MRI finding of 1 new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesion of >0.8 cubic centimeters in volume or 2 or more Gd+ lesions of any size 2) clinical relapse. Clinical relapse was new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, as defined by: an increase of ≥1 grade in ≥2 functional scales of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS); an increase of ≥2 grades in 1 functional scale of the EDSS; or an increase of >0.5 in EDSS if the previous EDSS was ≤5.5, or ≥0.5 if the previous EDSS was >5.5 (NCT01071083)
Timeframe: 28 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects meeting criteria (Number)
Natalizumab4.7
Intravenous Placebo60.5
Interferon β-1a28.6
Glatiramer Acetate53.3
Methylprednisolone54.8

[back to top]

Time Course to Return of Radiological Activity, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Met Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Rescue Criteria.

MRI rescue criteria were the presence of 1 new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesion of >0.8 cubic centimeters in volume or 2 or more Gd+ lesions of any size, according to the central MRI reader. (NCT01071083)
Timeframe: 28 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects meeting criteria (Number)
Natalizumab0.0
Intravenous Placebo52.5
Interferon β-1a8.3
Glatiramer Acetate49.7
Methylprednisolone46.1

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Non-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-NonCog) Score

ADAS-NonCog is a subscale of ADAS aimed to evaluate the non-cognitive features such as mood state and behavioral changes. It takes about 10 minutes to be performed and includes 10 items: testing tearful, depressed mood, concentration/distractibility, uncooperative to testing, delusions, hallucinations, pacing, motor activity increase, tremors and appetite change. Scores range between 0 (excellent performance) and 35 (worst performance). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Week 28Week 52
Placebo6.074.735.207.20
Rebif 22 Mcg4.373.534.635.47

[back to top]

Global Deterioration Scale Score

"Global deterioration scale includes seven different diagnostic stages ranging between no cognitive deterioration and very serious cognitive deterioration. It investigates the cognitive impairment. Scores range between 1 (no cognitive deterioration) and 7 (very severe cognitive decline)." (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Placebo2.873.003.20
Rebif 22 Mcg3.003.053.26

[back to top]

Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Score

The GDS consists of 30 'yes' or 'no' items aimed to assess depression. One point is assigned to each answer and the cumulative score is rated on a scoring grid. Scores are grouped as follows: 0-9 'normal', 10-19 'mildly depressed', and 20-30 'severely depressed'. (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Placebo10.679.077.50
Rebif 22 Mcg10.119.6810.79

[back to top]

Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-PLUS) Score

CIBIC-PLUS: structured instrument based on comprehensive evaluation of 3 domains: participant cognition, behavior and functioning, including assessment of daily living activities. It includes 15 items and represents assessment of skilled clinician using validated scales based on the observation at interviews conducted separately with participant and caregiver familiar with behavior of participant. According to comparison between baseline and follow-up assessments, scores can range between 1 (markedly improved) and 7 (markedly worsened), with 4 indicating no change observed between two visits. (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Week 28 and 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 1Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 2Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 3Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 4Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 5Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 6Week 28: CIBIC-PLUS Score 7Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 1Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 2Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 3Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 4Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 5Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 6Week 52: CIBIC-PLUS Score 7
Placebo02650200224430
Rebif 22 Mcg10783000067141

[back to top]

Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score

MMSE is a tool for screening cognitive decline associated with dementia. It is a brief examination intended to evaluate an adult participant's level of cognitive functioning. The test is performed in following areas: orientation in time and place, learning and immediate recall, mental control and concentration, short-term recall, naming ability, language expression, verbal comprehension, writing comprehension, writing ability and visual-spatial coordination. Scores range between 0 (maximum cognitive deficit) and 30 (no cognitive deficit). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Week 28Week 52
Placebo22.9324.6623.6621.98
Rebif 22 Mcg23.4624.5024.2522.43

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

ADAS: global rating scale created to evaluate both cognitive and functional aspects linked with disease progression. ADAS-Cog: subscale of ADAS which consists in a series of short tests aimed to evaluate possible cognitive impairment due to disease progression. It includes 11 items, testing word-finding difficulty, following commands, naming: objects and fingers, orientation, word recognition, recall of test instructions, constructions, ideational praxis, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language and word recall. Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 70 (serious deficit). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Week 12 and 28

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 12Week 28
Placebo17.9717.55
Rebif 22 Mcg16.7418.49

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

ADAS: global rating scale created to evaluate both cognitive and functional aspects linked with disease progression. ADAS-Cog: subscale of ADAS which consists in a series of short tests aimed to evaluate possible cognitive impairment due to disease progression. It includes 11 items, testing word-finding difficulty, following commands, naming: objects and fingers, orientation, word recognition, recall of test instructions, constructions, ideational praxis, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language and word recall. Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 70 (serious deficit). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 52
Placebo19.8120.33
Rebif 22 Mcg18.6320.66

[back to top]

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Score

IADL is used to evaluate participants with early-stage disease, both to assess level of disease and to determine participant's ability of self-care. IADL scale measures functional impact of emotional, cognitive, and physical impairments. It provides information about participants' compromising rate and care he might need. It includes 8 items: testing ability to use telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medication and ability to handle finances. Scores range between 0 (impairment) and 8 (full independence). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Placebo6.205.605.67
Rebif 22 Mcg6.115.844.89

[back to top]

Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) Score

PSMS designed as a disability measure for use in planning and evaluating treatment in elderly participants living in community or in institutions, is Guttman scale containing 6 items of self-care. The scale is based on theory that human behavior can be ordered in a hierarchy of complexity, within each category, a further hierarchy of complexity runs from basic to complex activities. It includes 6 items, testing the following areas: toilet use, eating, dressing, physical appearance, deambulation and bath. Scores range between 0 (excellent performance) and 30 (worst performance). (NCT01075763)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Placebo6.407.006.87
Rebif 22 Mcg6.426.747.79

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HBV-DNA Lowering to <3,400 IU/mL and to < 2,000 IU/mL

(NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm, at the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120 and at the end of the follow-up period at Week 144

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of treatment: HBV-DNA < 3,400 IU/mL24 weeks of follow-up: HBV-DNA < 3,400 IU/mL48 weeks of follow-up: HBV-DNA < 3,400 IU/mLEnd of treatment: HBV-DNA < 2,000 IU/mL24 weeks of follow-up: HBV-DNA < 2,000 IU/mL48 weeks of follow-up: HBV-DNA < 2,000 IU/mL
PEG-IFN+LAM9676.024.020.072.020.020.0
PEG-IFN4860.823.511.858.821.611.8
PEG-IFN9667.330.830.867.328.828.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization

(NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm, at the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120 and at the end of the follow-up period at Week 144

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of treatment24 weeks of follow-up48 weeks of follow-up
PEG-IFN+LAM9640.040.036.0
PEG-IFN4835.345.135.3
PEG-IFN9640.446.234.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Combined Response Using a Cut-Off for HBV-DNA Levels to 2,000 IU/mL

Combined response was defined here as ALT normalization plus lowering HBV-DNA levels to a cutt-off <2,000 IU/mL. In case of missing end of treatment measurements, the next available post-treatment value was used. In case of missing week-24 post-treatment measurements, the nearest value with respect to the schedule time point in the time window 12 weeks post treatment until study end was used. Participants with missing 48 weeks follow-up measurements were considered as non-responders. However, if the scheduled 48-weeks post-treatment tests were performed earlier or later than 48 weeks post-treatment, but not earlier than 36 weeks post-treatment, the corresponding results were considered to determine response. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm, at the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120 and at the end of the follow-up period at Week 144

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of treatment24 weeks of follow-up48 weeks of follow-up
PEG-IFN+LAM9628.020.020.0
PEG-IFN4829.421.611.8
PEG-IFN9638.526.923.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HbsAg) Level at the End of Treatment

(NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm

,,
InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Baseline (n=51, 51, 25)Change from baseline (n=44, 44, 20)
PEG-IFN+LAM968981.0-3121.2
PEG-IFN489642.6-2801.1
PEG-IFN967229.8-2282.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at the End of the Follow-up Period

Combined response was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization plus lowering of hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribo nucleic acid (DNA) levels to <20,000 copies/mL (<3,400 IU/mL) and was measured at the end of the 48-week follow-up period. Participants with missing 48 weeks follow-up measurements were considered as non-responders. However, if the scheduled 48-weeks post-treatment tests were performed earlier or later than 48 weeks post-treatment, but not earlier than 36 weeks post-treatment, the corresponding results were considered to determine response. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At the end of the 48-week follow-up period at Week 144

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN4811.8
PEG-IFN9625.0
PEG-IFN+LAM9620.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Histological Response

Histological response was defined as an improvement by >/= 2 in the Necroinflammatory Grading and/or by an improvement by >/= 1 score in Fibrosis Staging according to Ishak. Necroinflammatory Grading ranges 0-14 and is the combined score for necrosis, range 0-10 and inflammation, range 0-4. The participant is scored for only one inflammatory condition. A higher score indicates worse condition. Fibrosis Staging according to Ishak ranges 0-6 and a higher score indicates greater fibrosis. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At the end of the 48-week follow-up period at Week 144

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN4813.7
PEG-IFN965.8
PEG-IFN+LAM968.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Lamivudine Genotype Resistance During PEG-IFN+LAM96 Combined Therapy

Lamivudine resistance mutations were assessed by detection of the following mutations: rtL80V, rtL80I, rtV173G, rtV173L, rtL180M, rtA181T, rtA181V, rtM204V, rtM204I and rtN236T. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At the end of the treatment period at Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN+LAM960

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HbsAg) and Hepatitis B Surface Antibodies (Anti-HBs) Seroconversion

This outcome measure presents percentage of participants with a combined response of HBsAg < 5 IU/mL and anti-HBs positive. Positive anti-HBs represents antibodies produced against Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) and is an indication of recovery and immunity from HBV infection. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm, at the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120 and at the end of the follow-up period at Week 144

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of treatment24 weeks of follow-up48 weeks of follow-up
PEG-IFN+LAM960.00.00.0
PEG-IFN482.00.00.0
PEG-IFN963.85.87.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HBV-DNA Below Limit of Quantification

HBV-DNA limit < 6 IU/mL was defined as below quantification. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm, at the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120 and at the end of the follow-up period at Week 144

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of treatment24 weeks of follow-up48 weeks of follow-up
PEG-IFN+LAM9624.04.08.0
PEG-IFN4817.60.02.0
PEG-IFN9630.87.77.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at the End of Treatment

Combined response was defined as ALT normalization plus lowering of HBV-DNA levels to <20,000 copies/mL (<3,400 IU/mL). In case of missing end of treatment measurements, the next available post-treatment value was used. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At end of treatment at Week 48 or 96 depending on the study arm

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN4829.4
PEG-IFN9638.5
PEG-IFN+LAM9632.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Combined Response at 24 Weeks of Follow-up

Combined response was defined as ALT normalization plus lowering of HBV-DNA levels to <20,000 copies/mL (<3,400 IU/mL). In case of missing week-24 post-treatment measurements, the nearest value with respect to the schedule time point in the time window 12 weeks post treatment until study end was used. (NCT01095835)
Timeframe: At the end of 24 weeks of follow-up at Week 120

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN4823.5
PEG-IFN9628.8
PEG-IFN+LAM9624.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Disease-free Survival (DFS)

DFS will be calculated from the date treatment starts to the date of documented recurrence or death. It will be summarized using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Treatment will be considered relatively ineffective in this population if the underlying 2-year DFS is <60%, whereas the combination will be considered promising if the underlying rate is >80%. (NCT01100528)
Timeframe: 5 years from time-of-enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I: Dacarbazine + Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Toxicity or Grade 4 Adverse Events Via CTCAE Version 3.0

Number of participants with toxicity as defined as an underlying risk of >33% Grade 3 (non blood/bone marrow) or Grade 4 adverse events that are related to therapy, assessed by NCI CTCAE version 3.0 (NCT01100528)
Timeframe: up to 32 weeks from start of study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I: Dacarbazine + Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b2

[back to top]

Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as HCV NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin59.2
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin59.6
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin37.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs), and Who Died

SAE was defined as a medical event that at any dose resulted in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; was life threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or required or prolonged hospitalization. (NCT01125189)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment (day 1) up to follow-up Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SAEsDiscontinuations Due to AEsDeath
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin1272
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin1370
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin680

[back to top]

Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

eRVR was defined as HCV RNA NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin54.4
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin54.1
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin13.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Resistant Variants Associated With Virologic Failure

"Virologic failure was defined as:~Virologic breakthrough: confirmed >1 log10 increase in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA over nadir or confirmed RNA ≥lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) after confirmed HCV RNA NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 48

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Virologic BreakthroughWeek 4 Futility RuleDetectable HCV RNA at EOTOther CriteriaRelapse
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin8.22.07.51.418.5
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin10.32.16.80.119.0
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin2.825.05.66.922.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

RVR was defined as undetectable RNA (HCV RNA NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin59.9
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin56.8
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin15.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With 12-week Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as undetectable RNA (HCV RNA < lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), target not detected (TND) at follow-up Week 12. The LLOQ was 25 IU/mL, and NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin64.6
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin60.3
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin36.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

cEVR was defined as undetectable RNA (HCV RNA NCT01125189)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir (20 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin77.6
Daclatasvir (60 mg) + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin75.3
Placebo + Peg-interferon Alfa-2a + Ribavirin43.1

[back to top]

Number of Relapse-free Participants

A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for >= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS). (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 96

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rebif 44 Mcg10
No Treatment7

[back to top]

Time From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)

A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for >= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS). (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 96

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Rebif 44 Mcg35.5
No Treatment40.9

[back to top]

Absolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96

Analysis of T1 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96

,
InterventionT1 lesions (Mean)
Week 24 (n= 13,15)Week 48 (n= 13,13)Week 72 (n= 12,12)Week 96 (n= 12,12)
No Treatment-0.91.5-3.6-2.3
Rebif 44 Mcg-0.5-0.8-0.8-1.8

[back to top]

Absolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96

Analysis of T2 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96

,
InterventionT2 lesions (Mean)
Week 24 (n= 13,15)Week 48 (n= 13,13)Week 72 (n= 12,13)Week 96 (n= 12,12)
No Treatment1.03.23.12.1
Rebif 44 Mcg-1.20.2-1.8-3.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition. (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
No Treatment141
Rebif 44 Mcg155

[back to top]

Mean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. EDSS progression was defined as increase by at least 1 point if last value of EDSS was equal to 5.5, and by at least 0.5 points if last EDSS was more than 5.5. (NCT01142466)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Week 12 (n= 14, 15)Week 24 (n= 14, 15)Week 36 (n= 13, 14)Week 48 (n= 14, 14)Week 60 (n= 10, 11)Week 72 (n= 12, 13)Week 84 (n= 12, 13)Week 96 (n= 12, 13)
No Treatment-0.10.1-0.20.20.00.20.20.3
Rebif 44 Mcg-0.10.30.50.50.40.30.50.1

[back to top]

Number of Days Until First On-study Relapse

Patients were followed-up during 12 months and time to first on-study relapse from randomization was recorded. (NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
NatalizumabNA
Interferon-beta-1b103

[back to top]

Proportion of Relapse Free Patients

(NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Natalizumab10
Interferon-beta-1b7

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

Recording and reporting according to regulations. Monthly assessments or if necessary. (NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with infectionsNumber of patients with injections site reactions
Interferon-beta-1b44
Natalizumab70

[back to top]

MRI Parameters

Number of new T2-hyperintense lesions, Number of Gd-enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images. Assessments at month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24. (NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionLesions (Median)
nT2L month 3nT2L month 6nT2L month 9nT2L month 12GD+L month 3GD+L month 6GD+L month 9GD+L month 12
Interferon-beta-1b0.51.50.500000
Natalizumab00000000

[back to top]

Severity of Relapses

Change of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS 1-10). Higher values represent a worser outcome. (NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months vs baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Natalizumab0
Interferon-beta-1b0.5

[back to top]

Number of Infections

(NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionevents (Number)
Natalizumab25
Interferon-beta-1b8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relapses

(NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Natalizumab0
Interferon-beta-1b2

[back to top]

Number of Relapses

(NCT01144052)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Natalizumab0
Interferon-beta-1b3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate Assessed by RECIST Criteria.

The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started, including baseline). The patient's best response assignment will depend on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. Objective response will be assessed by RECIST criteria. (NCT01158534)
Timeframe: at week 4 of cycle 2 and every other cycle thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseNo Response
Celecoxib and Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2b0359

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival measured in months and summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time to objective progression will be measured from the start of treatment until the criteria for progression are met, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started, including baseline. (NCT01158534)
Timeframe: to progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Celecoxib and Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2b5.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival measured in months and summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01158534)
Timeframe: death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Celecoxib and Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2b14.4

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Statistically Significant Change in Cellular Immune Parameters From Baseline to 2 Months

To evaluate the effect of celecoxib and interferon alpha therapy on cellular immune parameters. Absolute change following two cycles of therapy. (NCT01158534)
Timeframe: at two months from start of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Celecoxib and Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2b0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of overall response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started, including baseline). The duration of overall CR is measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR until the first date that recurrent disease is objectively documented. (NCT01158534)
Timeframe: end of study

Interventionmonths (Median)
Celecoxib and Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2b8.7

[back to top]

Segment 2: Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

The primary efficacy endpoint for Segment 2 of the study was the percentage of participants achieving cEVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-0141625100.0
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162594.0
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-0141625100.00

[back to top]

Segment 2: RVR4

For Segment 2, the percentage of participants in the virology population who achieved RVR4, defined as HCV RNA less than or equal to the LOQ at the Week 4 visit. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-014162578.9
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162588.8
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-014162589.5

[back to top]

Segment 1: Rapid Viral Response At Week 4 (RVR4)

The primary efficacy endpoint for Segment 1 of the study was the percentage of participants in each treatment group achieving RVR4 (hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than or equal to the limit of quantitation [LOQ] at the Week 4 visit). (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rapid Virologic Response (%)No Rapid Virologic Response (%)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-014162575.025.0
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162575.025.0
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-014162576.523.5
Segment 1: Placebo20.080.0

[back to top]

Segment 1: Safety

Segment 1: Percentage of participants with the following: adverse events, abnormal laboratory safety tests, dose reductions, interruptions, and discontinuations. Criteria for abnormal laboratory safety tests: treatment-emergent worsening Division of AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) (DAIDs) graded laboratory tests. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adverse Events (%)Abnormal Laboratories (%)Dose Reductions (%)Dose Interruptions (%)Dose Discontinuations (%)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-0141625100.0100.0006.0
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162593.8100.0000
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-0141625100.094.0006.0
Segment 1: Placebo93.3100.0000

[back to top]

Segment 1: cEVR

For Segment 1, the percentage of participants in the virology population who achieved cEVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-014162562.5
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162575.0
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-014162570.6
Segment 1: Placebo33.3

[back to top]

Segment 2: Safety

Segment 2: Percentage of participants with the following: adverse events, abnormal laboratory safety tests and dose reductions, interruptions and discontinuations. Criteria for abnormal laboratory safety tests: treatment-emergent worsening DAIDs graded laboratory tests. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adverse Events (%)Abnormal Laboratories (%)Dose Reductions (%)Dose Interruptions (%)Dose Discontinuations (%)
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-014162594.7100.0006.0
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162585.095.00020.0
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-0141625100.0100.0000

[back to top]

Segment 1 And Segment 2: End Of Treatment Response

The percentage of virology population participants who were reported as undetectable HCV RNA at the completion of treatment. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: Week 48 (Segment 1); Week 24 (Segment 2)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-014162575.0
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162575.0
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-014162564.7
Segment 1: Placebo53.3
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-0141625100.0
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162592.3
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-0141625100.0

[back to top]

Segment 1 And Segment 2: Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks (6 Months Post-dosing) (SVR24)

The percentage of virology population participants who achieved SVR, defined as HCV RNA less than the LOQ, 6 months post-dosing. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 6 months post-dosing

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-014162562.5
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162556.3
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-014162535.3
Segment 1: Placebo40.0
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-014162570.0
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162576.9
Segment 2 : 800 mg ACH-014162583.3

[back to top]

Segment 1 And Segment 2: Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks (3 Months Post-dosing) (SVR12)

The percentage of virology population participants who achieved sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as HCV RNA less than the LOQ, at 12 weeks (3 months) post-dosing. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: 3 months post-dosing

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-014162556.3
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-014162556.3
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-014162535.3
Segment 1: Placebo40.0
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-014162580.0
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-014162576.9
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-014162584.5

[back to top]

Segment 1 And Segment 2: HCV RNA Change From Baseline

The mean change from baseline in log10 HCV RNA level by visit for the virology population (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionlog10 HCV RNA Level (Mean)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-0141625-4.94
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-0141625-4.60
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-0141625-4.94
Segment 1: Placebo-2.22
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-0141625-4.74
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-0141625-5.04
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-0141625-4.51

[back to top]

Segment 1 And Segment 2: HCV RNA Change From Baseline

Change from baseline in log10 HCV RNA level by visit. (NCT01180790)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionlog10 HCV RNA level (Mean)
Segment 1: 200 mg ACH-0141625-5.13
Segment 1: 400 mg ACH-0141625-4.51
Segment 1: 800 mg ACH-0141625-4.67
Segment 1: Placebo-3.48
Segment 2: 200 mg ACH-0141625-4.90
Segment 2: 400 mg ACH-0141625-5.08
Segment 2: 800 mg ACH-0141625-4.58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events determined and evaluated by patient reporting and the DAIDS toxicity table. (NCT01185028)
Timeframe: 1 year and 2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Nitazoxanide With Pegylated Interferon And Ribavirin8

[back to top]

Sustained Viral Response Rate

Proportion of participants that are HCV negative 6 months after treatment completion (NCT01185028)
Timeframe: 1 year and 2 mos

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Nitazoxanide With Pegylated Interferon And Ribavirin8

[back to top]

Tolerability of Study Drug Measured as Discontinuation.

Proportion of individuals that discontinued study drug due to intolerability. (NCT01185028)
Timeframe: 1 year and 2 mos

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nitazoxanide With Pegylated Interferon And Ribavirin0

[back to top]

HCV RNA Result

Will measure mean HCV RNA levels 4 weeks after liver transplant (NCT01192698)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after liver transplant

InterventionIU/ml (Mean)
IV Interferon924,082
no Treatment3,731,749

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Scale (EuroQol) 5-Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L)

The EQ-5D health questionnaire is a generic self-reported health-related quality of life instrument that includes a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure the general health state, as well as 5 items corresponding to one dimension each: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. In this study, the VAS scale is not collected and the version 3L of the scale was used: Each dimension had 3 possible levels: 1 = no problem, 2 = some problems and 3 = extreme problems. EQ-5D-3L weighted health state index exists that combines the score of the 5 dimensions and ranges from 0 to 1 (full health). The variables for the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D descriptive system was named 'mobility','selfcare', 'activity', 'pain', and 'anxiety'. The 5 variables contained the values for the different dimensions in the EQ-5D health profile (i.e. 1, 2, or 3). (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=60, 63)Change at Week 96 (n=43, 45)
Cholecalciferol0.7834-0.0051
Placebo0.79370.0043

[back to top]

Number of Relapse-Free (Documented) Subjects

The relapse-free patients after 2 years of treatment was calculated using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using the site as control variable. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Cholecalciferol35
Placebo27

[back to top]

Mean Number of Relapses Per Subject

Relapse was defined as new, worsening or recurrent neurological symptoms attributed to multiple sclerosis that last for at least 24 hours without fever or infection, or adverse reaction to prescribed medication, preceded by a stable or improving neurological status of at least 30 days. Mean and standard deviation were reported. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

Interventionrelapses (Mean)
Cholecalciferol0.5
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Progression of Disability (Kaplan-Meier Curves)

Disability progression was assessed using Expanded disability status scale (EDSS). EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A one-point increase on the EDSS scale was considered as a progression in disability. The time to disability progression was summarized using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. The cumulative probability of confirmed disease progression at each visit was obtained by applying a Kaplan-Meier method to the time to confirmed disease progression. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 96

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Cholecalciferol12.7
Placebo9.1

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate

The annualized relapse rate was calculated for each treatment group as follows: the number of relapses observed during the study period divided by the time spent in the study (in years). (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

InterventionRelapse per year (Mean)
Cholecalciferol0.45
Placebo0.34

[back to top]

Time to First Documented Relapse

Time to First Documented Relapse was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

Interventionweeks (Median)
CholecalciferolNA
Rebif +PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Number of New or Extended Lesions by T1- and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

(NCT01198132)
Timeframe: 2 years post treatment (IMP) administration

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
T1-weighted MRIT2-weighted MRI
Cholecalciferol0.40.5
Placebo1.92.0

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Measured Lesion Load (T2)

Baseline defined as last value recorded prior to first intake of study drug. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Interventioncubic millimeter (mm^3) (Mean)
Baseline (n=49, 43)Change at Week 96 (n=44, 38)
Cholecalciferol5305.4-315.0
Placebo3520.1596.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Measurement and Evaluation of Cognitive Ability by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) Total Score At Week 96

The Adapted Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. The total score for PASAT is the total number of correct answers (out of 60, for a total possible score ranging from 0-60 with higher score indicates higher auditory processing speed) for each trial. Change from baseline in PASAT total score at Week 96 was summarized. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 96
Cholecalciferol39.96.4
Placebo43.36.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Abnormal Clinical Laboratory

A serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect and TEAE was defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Clinical laboratory abnormalities are expected to be reported as adverse events if they met any criterion for seriousness, led to treatment discontinuation, required a medical intervention or were considered clinically significant by the investigator. (NCT01198132)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (week 96)

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
TEAEsSerious TEAEs
Cholecalciferol4311
Placebo3510

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Month 18

EHD scale is a tool to assess the depressive mood dimensions 'lack of emotional control' (emotional dyscontrol) and 'blunted effect' which comprises of 11 items graded in 4 degrees from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), where 4 corresponds to the worst state. The emotional dyscontrol sub-score is the sum of items 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, and 11. The total possible score range from 1 (not at all) to 28 (very much), where 28 corresponds to worst state. (Radat F et al., 2007) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon-beta-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Month 24

EHD scale is a tool to assess the depressive mood dimensions 'lack of emotional control' (emotional dyscontrol) and 'blunted effect' which comprises of 11 items graded in 4 degrees from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), where 4 corresponds to the worst state. The emotional dyscontrol sub-score is the sum of items 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, and 11. The total possible score range from 1 (not at all) to 28 (very much), where 28 corresponds to worst state. (Radat F et al., 2007) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon-beta-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

CES-D is an auto-questionnaire including 20 items to screen for depressive feelings and behaviour. The 20 items of this scale are graded from 0 (never) to 3 (always), where 3 corresponds to the most severe state with the exception of items 4, 8, 12 and 16 (scoring was reversed before the calculation of the total score). Total score ranged from 0 (never) to 60 (always), where 60 corresponds to most severe state. (Radloff LS, 1977) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 70)Change at Month 1 (n= 65)Change at Month 2 (n= 62)Change at Month 3 (n= 64)Change at Month 4 (n= 58)Change at Month 5 (n= 58)Change at Month 6 (n= 56)Change at Month 9 (n= 58)Change at Month 12 (n= 57)Change at Month 18 (n= 61)Change at Month 24 (n= 63)
Interferon-beta13.51.01.5-0.5-1.0-1.10.90.91.6-0.20.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Center for State-trait Anger Expression Inventory 2 (STAXI-state) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

STAXI-state scale measures the intensity of anger as an emotional state (state anger) and the disposition to experience angry feelings as a personality trait (trait anger). In this study only 1 of the original 6 scales was used, the state anger scale, which measures the intensity of anger at a given moment as emotional state. This scale consists of 15 items graded in 4 degrees from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), where 4 corresponds to the worst state. The total score range from 1 (not at all) to 60 (very much), where 60 corresponds to the worst state. (Spielberger CD, 1996) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 70)Change at Month 1 (n= 65)Change at Month 2 (n= 62)Change at Month 3 (n= 64)Change at Month 4 (n= 59)Change at Month 5 (n= 58)Change at Month 6 (n= 56)Change at Month 9 (n= 58)Change at Month 12 (n= 57)Change at Month 18 (n= 61)Change at Month 24 (n= 63)
Interferon-beta16.80.01.0-0.0-0.3-0.01.11.10.90.81.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Emotional Abrasion Sub-score of the EHD Scale at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

EHD scale is a tool to assess the depressive mood dimensions 'lack of emotional control' (emotional dyscontrol) and 'blunted effect' which comprises of 11 items graded in 4 degrees from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), where 4 corresponds to the worst state. The emotional abrasion sub-score is the sum of items 3, 6, 7, and 8. The total possible score range from 1 (not at all) to 16 (very much), where 16 corresponds to worst state. (Radat F et al., 2007) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 70)Change at Month 1 (n= 64)Change at Month 2 (n= 62)Change at Month 3 (n= 64)Change at Month 4 (n= 59)Change at Month 5 (n= 58)Change at Month 6 (n= 56)Change at Month 9 (n= 58)Change at Month 12 (n= 57)Change at Month 18 (n= 61)Change at Month 24 (n= 63)
Interferon-beta5.60.3-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.2-0.3-0.1-0.0-0.3-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Emotional Dyscontrol Sub-score of the Depressive Mood Scale (Echelle d'Humeur Depressive [EHD]) Scale at Month 12

EHD scale is a tool to assess the depressive mood dimensions 'lack of emotional control' (emotional dyscontrol) and 'blunted effect' which comprises of 11 items graded in 4 degrees from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), where 4 corresponds to the worst state. The emotional dyscontrol sub-score is the sum of items 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, and 11. The total possible score range from 1 (not at all) to 28 (very much), where 28 corresponds to worst state. (Radat F et al., 2007) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 70)Change at Month 12 (n= 57)
Interferon-beta12.7-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24

Fatigue scale was derived from the United Kingdom Neurological Disability Scale (UKNDS), and evaluates fatigue according to the participant's subjective impression and the functional disability that it causes. 'Yes' or 'No' answers result in a score that ranges from 0 to 5, where a score 5 shows worse state. (Sharrack B et al., 1999) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 62)Change at Month 1 (n= 58)Change at Month 2 (n= 55)Change at Month 3 (n= 56)Change at Month 6 (n= 50)Change at Month 12 (n= 49)Change at Month 24 (n= 56)
Interferon-beta2.10.50.40.20.40.1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI State) Score at Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

STAI state scale is an auto-evaluation scale for anxiety. This scale includes 20 items that allow quantifying feeling of apprehension, tension, nervousness and worry that the participant feels at the time of the completion of the questionnaire. The 20 items are graded from 1 (no) to 4 (yes), where 'yes' corresponds to the best state for items 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20 (scoring was reversed before calculation of total score); and to the worst state for items 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18. The total score ranged from 1 (best state) to 80 (worst state). (Spielberger CD et al., 1983) (NCT01201343)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 70)Change at Month 1 (n= 65)Change at Month 2 (n= 62)Change at Month 3 (n= 64)Change at Month 4 (n= 59)Change at Month 5 (n= 58)Change at Month 6 (n= 55)Change at Month 9 (n= 58)Change at Month 12 (n= 57)Change at Month 18 (n= 61)Change at Month 24 (n= 63)
Interferon-beta35.90.80.3-1.7-1.5-0.8-1.4-0.2-0.3-1.2-1.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Drugs (SVR12 Planned)

The table below shows the percentage of participants achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 weeks after last planned dose of study medication (SVR12 planned). SVR was defined as having Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than 25 international units/milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: End of trial, 12 weeks after last planned dose

Interventionpercentage of participants with response (Number)
T12(q8h)/PR72.8
T12(b.i.d.)/PR74.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Failure Which Required Them to Permanently Discontinue All Study Drugs

The table below shows the percentage of participants who met a stopping rule, defined as having a hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) value at Week 4 >1000 IU/mL and at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 40 ≥25 IU/mL. (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: Week 4, 12, 24, 32, 40

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
T12(q8h)/PR9.7
T12(b.i.d.)/PR10.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed During Follow-up Period

The table below shows the percentage of participants who relapsed (ie, those having confirmed detectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA] during the 12-week follow-up period after previous HCV RNA <25 IU/mL, target not detected, at end of treatment). (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: During Follow-Up (24 weeks after the last dose of study drug)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
T12(q8h)/PR7.2
T12(b.i.d.)/PR7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Values of Less Than 25 IU/ml, Target Not Detected, at Different Time Points.

The table below shows the percentage of participants with undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels, which means less than 25 IU/ml, target not detected, at different time points during the study. (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 4+12.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with response (Number)
Baselineat Week 4at Week 4 and Week 12
T12(b.i.d.)/PR069.466.1
T12(q8h)/PR067.463.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants of Each IL28B Genotype Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Medication (SVR12 Planned)

The table below shows the effect of interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene's subtype (CC, CT or TT genotype) on the primary outcome measure: SVR12 planned. (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: End of trial, 12 weeks after the last planned dose

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with response (Number)
CC genotype (n = 108; n = 103)CT genotype (n = 207; n = 207)TT genotype (n = 56; n = 59)
T12(b.i.d.)/PR92.467.565.5
T12(q8h)/PR86.867.864.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 72 Weeks After the Start of Study Medication (SVR72 Planned)

The table below shows the percentage of participants achieving SVR 72 weeks after the start of study medication (SVR72 planned). SVR was defined as having plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than 25 IU/mL, target not detected, at end of treatment and up to 72 weeks after start of study medication (i.e., no confirmed detectable HCV RNA in between). (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: End of trial, 72 weeks after the start of study medication

Interventionpercentage of participants with response (Number)
T12(q8h)/PR69.0
T12(b.i.d.)/PR70.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the Last Planned Dose of Study Drugs (SVR24 Planned)

The table below shows the percentage of participants achieving SVR 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study medication. SVR was defined as having Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than 25 international units/milliliter (IU/mL). The response for T12(b.i.d)/PR group is higher than that after 12 weeks because HCV RNA data for two participants were missing for SVR assessment at that time. Consequently, by definition of SVR12, they were counted as not having achieved SVR12. (NCT01241760)
Timeframe: End of trial, 24 weeks after last planned dose

Interventionpercentage of participants with response (Number)
T12(q8h)/PR72.8
T12(b.i.d.)/PR74.8

[back to top]

Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Double-Blind Treatment

The total number of new T1-Hypo-Intense Lesions (Chronic Black Holes) for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of new lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC1307
Ocrelizumab564

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs included infusion related reactions (IRRs) and serious MS relapses, but excluded non-serious MS relapses. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) included serious MS relapses and serious IRRs. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC331
Ocrelizumab327

[back to top]

Number of New, and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double Blind Treatment

The total number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC1916
Ocrelizumab430

[back to top]

Exposure to Ocrelizumab (Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve, AUC)

AUC represents total drug exposure for one dosing interval after the 4th dose. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Weeks 1, 24, 48, 72; and 30 minutes post-infusion at Week 72; at any time during Weeks 84 and 96

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter*day (Mean)
Ocrelizumab3513

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at 96 Weeks

ARR was protocol-defined and calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionrelapses/participant year of treatment (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC0.292
Ocrelizumab0.156

[back to top]

Percent Change in Brain Volume as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 24 to Week 96

"Brain volume was recorded as an absolute normalized value at the baseline visit then recorded at subsequent visits as a percentage change relative to the absolute value at the baseline visit. Therefore, brain volume at Week 24 was calculated as the brain volume at the baseline visit multiplied by 1 + ([percentage change in brain volume from baseline visit to Week 24]/100). Estimates are from analysis based on mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM) using unstructured covariance matrix: Percentage Change = Brain Volume at Week 24 + Geographical Region (US vs. ROW) + Baseline EDSS (< 4.0 vs. >= 4.0) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week) + Brain Volume at Week 24*Week." (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: From Week 24 up to Week 96

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC-0.741
Ocrelizumab-0.572

[back to top]

Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double-Blind Treatment

The total number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC337
Ocrelizumab21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Have No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) up to Week 96

NEDA was defined only for participants with a baseline EDSS score >=2.0. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Participants who completed the 96- week treatment period were considered as having evidence of disease activity if at least one protocol- defined relapse (PDR), a confirmed disability progression (CDP) event or at least one MRI scan showing MRI activity (defined as Gd-enhancing T1 lesions, or new or enlarging T2 lesions) was reported during the 96-week treatment period, otherwise the participant was considered as having NEDA. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC27.1
Ocrelizumab47.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) for at Least 12 Weeks

Disability improvement was assessed only for the subgroup of participants with a baseline EDSS score of >= 2.0. It was defined as a reduction in EDSS score of: A) >=1.0 from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >=2 and <=5.5 B) >= 0.5 when the baseline EDSS score > 5.5. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC12.42
Ocrelizumab20.00

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 12 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period

Disability progression was defined as an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of: A) >=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.5 B) >=0.5 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >5.5 The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. Disability progression was considered confirmed when the increase in the EDSS was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. EDSS assessment and who were on treatment at time of clinical cut-off date were censored at the date of their last EDSS assessment. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Week 108

Interventionweeks (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SCNA
OcrelizumabNA

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 24 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period

Disability progression was defined as an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of: A) >=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.5 B) >=0.5 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >5.5 The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. Disability progression was considered confirmed when the increase in the EDSS was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. Participants who had initial disability progression with no confirmatory EDSS assessment and who were on treatment at time of clinical cut-off date were censored at the date of their last EDSS assessment. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Week 108

Interventionweeks (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SCNA
OcrelizumabNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score to Week 96

MSFC score consists of: A) Timed 25-Foot walk; B) 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT); and C) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3 version). The MSFCS is based on the concept that scores for these three dimensions (arm, leg, and cognitive function) are combined to create a single score (the MSFC) that can be used to detect change over time in a group of participants with MS. Since the three primary measures differ in what they actually measure, a common composite score for the three different measures i.e., Z- score was selected for the purpose. MSFC Score = {Z arm, average + Z leg, average + Z cognitive} / 3.0. The results from each of these three tests are transformed into Z-scores and averaged to yield a composite score for each participant at each time point. A score of +1 indicates that, on average, an individual scored 1 standard deviation (SD) better than the reference population and a score of -1 indicates that an individual scored 1 SD worse than the reference population. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Unadjusted Baseline mean (n= 359, 360)Adjusted Week 96 mean (n= 308, 322)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC0.0280.174
Ocrelizumab-0.0120.213

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 96

The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores (domains) as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36 taps 8 health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, emotional well-being, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. The 8 scales are further summarized to 2 distinct higher-ordered clusters: the PCS and mental composite t-score (MCS). The range for all 8 domains as well as for the composite t- scores is from 0 to 100 with 100 as best possible health status and 0 as worst health status. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Interventiont-score (Mean)
Unadjusted Baseline mean (n= 338, 357)Adjusted mean change at week 96 (n= 276, 315)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC45.399-0.657
Ocrelizumab45.0650.036

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ocrelizumab

Number of participants positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to ocrelizumab is the number of post- baseline evaluable participants determined to have treatment-induced ADA or treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. (NCT01247324)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 96

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Positive sample at baseline (n= 397, 396)Positive for ADA post-baseline (n= 401, 402)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC22
Ocrelizumab11

[back to top]

Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)

PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review. Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >3, 5 or 10 Upper Limit of Normal (ULN); Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3, 5 or 10 ULN; Alkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULN; Total Bilirubin (TB) >1.5 ULN; and ALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN. (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: First study drug intake up to 28 days after last study drug intake, for up to 112 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT >3 ULNALT >5 ULNALT >10 ULNAST >3 ULNAST >5 ULNAST >10 ULNAlkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULNTB >1.5 ULNALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN
Placebo + IFN-beta611321020
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta952430020
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta963432200

[back to top]

Time to Relapse: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of no Relapse at Week 24, 48, and 72

Probability of no relapse at 24, 48 and 72 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to relapse defined as the time from randomization to first EDSS confirmed relapse. Participants free of confirmed relapse (no EDSS confirmed relapse observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last study drug intake. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time <=t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

,,
Interventionpercent probability of no relapse (Number)
Percent probability of no relapse at Week 24Percent probability of no relapse at Week 48Percent probability of no relapse at Week 72
Placebo + IFN-beta81.967.358.3
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta87.180.873.1
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta86.880.678.2

[back to top]

Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions Per MRI Scan

Total volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the sum of the volumes of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Interventionmilliliters per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-beta0.045
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta0.009
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta0.01

[back to top]

Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease) at Week 24

The total lesion volume (burden of disease) is the total volumes of hyperintense on T2 plus hypointense on T1 as measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data with factors for treatment, region, IFN-beta dose stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline burden of disease, and baseline-by-visit interaction. (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmilliliter (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + IFN-beta-0.008
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta-0.011
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta-0.044

[back to top]

Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: First study drug intake up to 28 days after last study drug intake, for up to 112 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEAny Serious AEAny AE Leading to DeathAny AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Placebo + IFN-beta119809
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta14014022
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta14013016

[back to top]

Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)

Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. To account for the different number of scans among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable; log-transformed number of scans as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrollment, IFN-beta dose stratum and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates). (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Interventionlesions per scan (Number)
Placebo + IFN-beta0.542
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta0.257
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta0.158

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (Poisson Regression Estimates)

"ARR is the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of patient-years treated. Each episode of relapse (appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever) was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score or Functional System scores. To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrollment and IFN-beta dose stratum, and number of relapses in the year prior to randomization as covariates)." (NCT01252355)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Interventionrelapses per patient-year (Number)
Placebo + IFN-beta0.298
Teriflunomide 7 mg + IFN-beta0.242
Teriflunomide 14 mg + IFN-beta0.238

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3

SVR24 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort69.2
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort66.7
Placebo59.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3

SVR12 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort69.2
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort77.8
Placebo51.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Who Died During Follow-up Period

AE was defined as any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not has a causal relationship with treatment. SAE was defined as a medical event that at any dose resulted in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; was life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or required or prolonged hospitalization. (NCT01257204)
Timeframe: From end of treatment period up to Week 48 (follow-up period)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEsDeaths
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort: Follow-up1620
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort: Follow-up1200
Placebo: Follow-up1100

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2

"Virologic failure was defined as:~Virologic breakthrough: confirmed >1 log10 increase in HCV RNA over nadir or confirmed RNA ≥lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) after confirmed HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Virologic breakthrough (n=24,23,24)<1 log10 decrease in HCV RNA at Week4 (n=24,23,24)HCV RNA ≥LLOQ or Relapse (n=23,21,22)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort0011
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort1120
Placebo1012

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3

"Virologic failure was defined as:~Virologic breakthrough: confirmed >1 log10 increase in HCV RNA over nadir or confirmed RNA ≥lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) after confirmed HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Virologic breakthrough (n=26,27,27)<1 log10 decrease in HCV RNA at Week4 (n=26,27,27)HCV RNA ≥LLOQ or Relapse (n=25,24,21)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort0016
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort0126
Placebo1333

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR) at Week 12 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2

cEVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort91.7
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort82.6
Placebo75.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR) at Week 12 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3

cEVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort80.8
Dacalatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort88.9
Placebo59.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2

RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort87.5
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort73.9
Placebo41.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4 for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 3

RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort84.6
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort74.1
Placebo37.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2

SVR12 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort87.5
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort82.6
Placebo70.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 2

SVR24 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01257204)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 12-Week Cohort83.3
Daclatasvir, 60 mg, 16-Week Cohort82.6
Placebo62.5

[back to top]

Change in the Total Symptom Score (TSS)

Change in the Total Symptom Score which assessed improvement in disease symptoms measured by the change in TSS from the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) instrument being used in this study from baseline to 12 months. This 19 item instrument includes the previously validated 9 item brief fatigue inventory (BFI), symptoms related to splenomegaly, inactivity, cough, night sweats, pruritus, bone pains, fevers, weight loss, and an overall quality of life assessment. Each item is scored from 0-10 with full scale from 0-190, with higher scores mean worse symptoms. (NCT01259856)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PEGASYS1.16
Hydroxyurea-1.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression of Disease or Death

"Survival and incidence of development of myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, or leukemic transformation after therapy~To estimate survival and incidence of development of myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, or leukemic transformation after therapy (Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a vs. Hydroxyurea) by capturing the rate of progression to a more advanced myeloid malignancy." (NCT01259856)
Timeframe: 4 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathProgression to MF
Hydroxyurea10
PEGASYS00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)

Number of participants with Complete Remission after 12 months of therapy assessed by hematologic response rates two strata of patients with high risk polycythemia vera (PV) or high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET). Complete remission means no evidence of disease. (NCT01259856)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Essential ThrombocythemiaPolycythemia Vera
Hydroxyurea1913
PEGASYS1712

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Hematological and Non-hematological Events

Number of Participants with Grade 3 and Grade 4 Hematological and Non-hematological Events using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 to assess the toxicity, safety and tolerability of therapy (Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a vs. Hydroxyurea). (NCT01259856)
Timeframe: 4 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3 Hematological eventGrade 4 Hematological eventGrade 3 Non-hematological eventGrade 4 Non-hematological event
Hydroxyurea20143
PEGASYS30272

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)

Number of participants with Partial Remission after 12 months of therapy assessed by hematologic response rates two strata of patients with high risk polycythemia vera (PV) or high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET). Partial Remission means decrease in the size of a tumor, or in the extent of cancer in the body, in response to treatment. (NCT01259856)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Essential ThrombocythemiaPolycythemia Vera
Hydroxyurea1117
PEGASYS1025

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events After Therapy

(NCT01259856)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEGASYS1
Hydroxyurea1

[back to top]

Change in FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) Total Score From Baseline to 3 Months

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Change in FACT-G total score from baseline to 3 months was calculated as month 3 score - baseline score. (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (HIP)-4.9
Arm B (HDI)-12.9
Arm C (LIP)-3.4

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS; Arm A [HIP] vs. Arm B [HDI])

"Recurrence-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to recurrence or death, whichever occurs first. The following criteria constitute the only acceptable evidence of disease recurrence.~Lung and liver: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease.~Central Nervous System: A positive brain CT or MRI scan or CSF cytology. Cutaneous, Subcutaneous and Lymph Node Recurrence: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease.~Bone and Other Organs: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease identified on two different radiologic studies: i.e., positive nuclear bone scan or PET scan and contrast GI series or ultrasound, X-ray or CT of abdomen for abdominal disease." (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 and then annually up to 8 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm A (HIP)3.9
Arm B (HDI)2.4

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS; Arm B [HDI] vs. Arm C [LIP])

"Recurrence-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to recurrence or death, whichever occurs first. The following criteria constitute the only acceptable evidence of disease recurrence.~Lung and liver: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease.~Central Nervous System: A positive brain CT or MRI scan or CSF cytology. Cutaneous, Subcutaneous and Lymph Node Recurrence: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease.~Bone and Other Organs: Positive cytology or biopsy in the presence of a single new lesion or the appearance of multiple lesions consistent with metastatic disease identified on two different radiologic studies: i.e., positive nuclear bone scan or PET scan and contrast GI series or ultrasound, X-ray or CT of abdomen for abdominal disease." (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 and then annually up to 8 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm B (HDI)2.5
Arm C (LIP)4.5

[back to top]

Change in FACT-BRM (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Biologic Response Modifiers) Total Score From Baseline to 3 Months

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Biologic Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) is a questionnaire including FACT-G (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) and additional sections addressing physical and mental quality of life aspects. It is a 40-item questionnaire with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-BRM total score ranges between 0 and 160. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Change in FACT-BRM total score from baseline to 3 months is calculated as month 3 score - baseline score. (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (HIP)-8.3
Arm B (HDI)-22.7
Arm C (LIP)-6.2

[back to top]

Change in FACIT-D (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Diarrhea) Diarrhea Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 Months

The diarrhea subscale of The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Diarrhea (FACIT-D) is an 11-item questionnaire with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-D diarrhea subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Change in FACIT-D diarrhea subscale score from baseline to 3 months was calculated as month 3 score - baseline score. (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (HIP)-3.7
Arm B (HDI)-0.7
Arm C (LIP)-2.2

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate (Arm B [HDI] vs. Arm C [LIP])

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm B (HDI)0.67
Arm C (LIP)0.72

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate (Arm A [HIP] vs. Arm B [HDI])

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. (NCT01274338)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A (HIP)0.70
Arm B (HDI)0.65

[back to top]

End-of-treatment Response

An end-of-treatment response is defined as a negative HCV PCR at 48 weeks after the start of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (NCT01276756)
Timeframe: 48 weeks +- 7 days after starting pegylated interferon and ribavirin

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care31
Triple Therapy29

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response

sustained virological response is defined as a negative HCV PCR at 180 days after the end of treatment (End of treatment being at 48 weeks for Group A, 52 weeks for Group B). For any patient who stopped treatment prematurely (e.g. due to adverse events) SVR was defined as a negative HCV PCR (polymerase chain reaction) at 180 days after the last dose of all medications (interferon, ribavirin and nitazoxanide) (NCT01276756)
Timeframe: 180 days (+- 7 days) after the end of treatment. (48 weeks for Group A, 52 weeks for Group B, or after the last dose of treatment for patients who stopped prematurely).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care24
Triple Therapy25

[back to top]

Rapid Virological Response

A rapid virologic response is defined as a negative HCV PCR 4 weeks after treatment (NCT01276756)
Timeframe: 28 - 33 days after start of Pegylated interferon and ribavirin

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care30
Triple Therapy25

[back to top]

Safety of Nitazoxanide (Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events)

The occurence of adverse events that could be linked temporally and reasonably to the administration of the tested drug. (NCT01276756)
Timeframe: throughout the period of treatment and up to 90 days after end of triple therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care50
Triple Therapy47

[back to top]

Early Virological Response

"A complete early virologic response is defined as a negative HCV PCR 90 days after the start of pegylated interferon.~A partial early virologic response is defined as a decrease of 2 or more log in HCV PCR at 90 days after the start of pegylated interferon" (NCT01276756)
Timeframe: 90 ± 7 days from the start of pegylated interferon and ribavirin

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete early virologic responsePartial early virologic responseNo early virologic response response
Standard of Care35510
Triple Therapy36014

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home

The percentage of participants with SVR-12 and SVR-24 treated at interferon application centers (IAC) and treated at home are presented. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 60 (SVR 12) and Week 72 (SVR 24)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SVR-12, treated at IAC (n=0, 40, 35)SVR-12, treated at home (n=14, 81, 57)SVR-24, treated at IAC (n=0, 40, 35)SVR-24, treated at home (n=14, 81, 57)
Conventional Interferon Plus RibavirinNA0NA64.3
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin5.08.680.075.3
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin2.933.377.168.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment

Virologic response at EOT was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at EOT (regardless in which week treatment was concluded). EOT = Week 48. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin25.8
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin40.4
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin35.3

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders

The average percentage reduction of hemoglobin (Hb) in treatment responders and treatment non-responders between the conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a plus and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented. Participants with undetectable HCV RNA at specified time points (Weeks 4/12/18/24/48) were considered as treatment responders. Participants with positive viral load (detectable HCV RNA) at end of treatment regardless of the treatment duration were considered as treatment non-responders. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

,,
Interventionmean percentage reduction of hemoglobin (Mean)
Responders (n=0,19,15)Non-responders (n=10,54,48)
Conventional Interferon Plus RibavirinNA18.3
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin14.49.8
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin15.812.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment

The percentage of participants who were treated at interferon application centers and at home and who discontinued treatment is presented. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At the site (n=0,98,126)At home (n=55,204,137)
Conventional Interferon Plus RibavirinNA5.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin17.411.8
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin17.521.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

An early virologic response (EVR) was defined as a HCV-RNA decrease of at least two logarithmic scales (2 Log) or 100 times the pretreatment value or non-detection at Week 12 of treatment period. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin14.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin37.2
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin35.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
any AEany SAE
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin572
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin28515
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin2649

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72

Virologic relapse was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment and detectable HCV-RNA at the last follow-up assessment available. If the participant was a responder at end of treatment and was not submitted to any viral load assessment during the follow-up period, he was considered a relapser. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin37.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin22.2
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin22.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

SVR was defined as virological response at 24 weeks after EOT, EOT= Week 48. Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 IU/mL HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin62.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin74.6
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin72.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 international units/milliliter (IU/mL) HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). EOT= Week 48. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin0
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin7.1
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin20.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4

Rapid virologic response was defined as qualitative or quantitative HCV-RNA (viral load) undetectable (below the lower limit of detection) at Week 4 of treatment period. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin6.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin21.2
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin20.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment

Null response or no responders were defined as those participants presenting positive viral load at EOT (regardless of the treatment duration). EOT= Week 48. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin74.2
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin59.6
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin64.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

The percentage of participants with treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AE) between conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented. (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin1.6
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin4.5
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin4.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used

The number of participants with Interferon dose reduction rates in function of the interferon type being used are reported (NCT01280656)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin1
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin9
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin29

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of T1 Hypo Intense Lesions at Week 48

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Baseline, 48 Weeks

Interventionmillimeter^3 (mm^3) (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)20.88
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)18.47

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of T2 Lesions at Week 48 (T2 Burden of Disease)

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Baseline, 48 Weeks

Interventionmillimeter^3 (mm^3) (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)130.38
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)95.75

[back to top]

Total Number of Reported Relapses at All Time Points up to 48 Weeks

Relapse was defined as neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both as neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding MS attack and Neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours, absence of fever or known infection greater than 37.5 degree centigrade /99.5 degree fahrenheit , objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS or increase of the total EDSS score and occurrence of paraesthesia, fatigue, mental symptoms, and/or vegetative symptoms without any additional symptom will not be classified as an MS attack. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionnumber of relapse per subject (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.25
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.34

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Free Status (Alternate Definition) at Week 48

Disease activity free (DAF) status was defined as absence of any of the clinical and imaging parameters related to the assessment of disease activity; no relapses, no confirmed expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression and no new gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing or relaxation time 2 (T2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions. Confirmed EDSS progression was defined as an EDSS progression confirmed after 24 weeks. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)47.8
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)37.9

[back to top]

Mean Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions Per Subject Per Scan at Week 48

CUA lesions was defined as new T1 (Gd enhancing) lesions, new Relaxation time 2 (T2) lesions, or enlarging T2 lesions. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionlesions per subject per scan (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)1.09
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)1.49

[back to top]

Number od Subjects With Confirmed EDSS Progression

EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined EDSS greater than or equal to 1.0 point confirmed during a visit performed 6 months later. An EDSS progression was defined as an increase of the EDSS score of at least 1.0 point compared to baseline (SD1) for subjects with a baseline EDSS ≤ 4.0. For subjects with an EDSS score of 0 at baseline (SD1), EDSS progression was defined as an increase of at least 1.5 points. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined as an EDSS progression confirmed after 24 weeks. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Baseline upto 48 Weeks

Interventionsubjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)8
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)4

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Free Status up to Week 48

Disease activity free status was defined as absence of any of the clinical and imaging parameters related to the assessment of disease activity; no relapses, no expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression and no new gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing or relaxation time 2 (T2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)37.2
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)35.3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Relapse

Relapse was defined as neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both as neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding MS attack and Neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours, absence of fever or known infection greater than 37.5 degree centigrade /99.5 degree fahrenheit , objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS or increase of the total EDSS score and occurrence of paraesthesia, fatigue, mental symptoms, and/or vegetative symptoms without any additional symptom will not be classified as an MS attack. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Baseline upto 48 weeks

Interventionsubjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)24
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)29

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate at Week 48

Relapse was defined as neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both as neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding MS attack and Neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours, absence of fever or known infection greater than 37.5 degree centigrade /99.5 degree fahrenheit , objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS or increase of the total EDSS score and occurrence of paraesthesia, fatigue, mental symptoms, and/or vegetative symptoms without any additional symptom will not be classified as an MS attack. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionrelapse per year (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.28
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.41

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Free From New T1 Hypointense Lesions (Black Holes) at Week 48

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)78.8
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)63.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Free From T1 Gadolinium Enhancing Lesions at Week 48

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)83.2
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)70.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Treated With Glucocorticoids Due to Relapses

Relapse was defined as neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both as neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding MS attack and Neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours, absence of fever or known infection greater than 37.5 degree centigrade /99.5 degree fahrenheit , objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS or increase of the total EDSS score and occurrence of paraesthesia, fatigue, mental symptoms, and/or vegetative symptoms without any additional symptom will not be classified as an MS attack. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Baseline upto 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)15.9
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)20.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Number of New Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions at Week 48

CUA lesions was defined as new T1 (Gd enhancing) lesions, new T2 lesions, or enlarging T2 lesions. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionlesions per subject per scan (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)1.09
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)1.49

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Free From Any Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression at Week 48

EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined EDSS greater than or equal to 1.0 point confirmed during a visit performed 6 months later. An EDSS progression was defined as an increase of the EDSS score of at least 1.0 point compared to baseline (SD1) for subjects with a baseline EDSS ≤ 4.0. For subjects with an EDSS score of 0 at baseline (SD1), EDSS progression was defined as an increase of at least 1.5 points. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined as an EDSS progression confirmed after 24 weeks. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)71.7
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)75.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects at Week 48

A relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. (NCT01285401)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)78.8
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)75.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Number of Relaxation Time 1 (T1) Gadolinium Enhancing Lesions at Week 48

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionlesions per subject per scan (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.36
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)0.25

[back to top]

Percentage of New T1 Hypointense Lesions (Black Holes) at Week 48 Within the Subgroup of New or Enlarging Non-enhancing T2 Lesions

(NCT01285401)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of new T1 hypointense lesions (Mean)
VigantOL Oil Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)20.11
Placebo Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif)27.70

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Demonstrating Viral Relapse

The table below shows the number of participants who demonstrated viral relapse, defined as undetectable Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) at end of treatment (EOT) and detectable HCV RNA during follow-up or detectable HCV RNA at the time points of sustained virologic response (SVR) assessment . The incidence of viral relapse was calculated for participants with undetectable HCV RNA levels at EOT and with at least one follow-up HCV RNA measurement. (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/484

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 24 Hrs (AUC24h) for TMC435

"The table below shows the median (range) AUC24h values for TMC435 for all participants who received TMC435 for up to 12 weeks. Overall is the median exposure estimate using all available data for each participant in the study. Sparse blood samples were collected during the study (blood sampling times were 3 and 5 hours post- dose at Week 2 and Week 8 and pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose at Week 4 and Week 12)." (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Overall (blood sampling times were 3 and 5 hours post- dose at Week 2 and Week 8 and pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose at Week 4 and Week 12)

Interventionng.h/mL (Median)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4863261

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough

Viral breakthrough was defined as a confirmed increase of greater than 1 log10 IU/mL in plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels from the lowest level reached or a confirmed value of plasma HCV RNA of > 2.0 log10 IU/mL in particpants whose plasma HCV RNA level had previously been below 1.2 log10 IU/mL detectable or undetectable during the treatment period. The table below shows that no viral breakthrough was noted in any participants during the treatment period of the study. (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Day 1 until end of treatment (EOT [Week 24 or 48])

InterventionParticipants (Number)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/480

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of TMC435

"The table below shows median (range) TMC435 predose plasma concentration (C0h) values and the TMC435 maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values for all participants who received TMC435 for up to 12 weeks. Overall is the median exposure estimate using all available data for each participant in the study.Sparse blood samples were collected during the study (blood sampling times were 3 and 5 hours post- dose at Week 2 and Week 8 and pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose at Week 4 and Week 12)." (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Overall (blood sampling times were 3 and 5 hours post- dose at Week 2 and Week 8 and pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose at Week 4 and Week 12)

Interventionng/mL (Median)
C0hCmax
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4818223440

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) During Treatment and at the End of Treatment (EOT)

The table below shows the percentage of participants with undetectable HCV RNA (defined as less than 1.2 log10 IU/mL during treatment at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and at EOT [Week 24 or 48]). (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and at EOT

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12Week 24Week 36Week 48Week 60Week 72EOT
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4881.6100.095.991.889.889.889.8100.0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than or Equal to 2 log10 IU/mL Drop From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) at Each Time Point During Treatment and Follow-up

The table below shows the percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 2 log10 IU/mL drop from baseline in plasma HCV RNA at each time point during treatment, at the end of treatment (Week 24 or 48), and post-treatment follow-up. (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Days 3 and 7, Weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, 60, 72, EOT, and follow-up (FU) Weeks 4, 12, and 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 3Day 7Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 36Week 48Week 60Week 72EOTFU Week 4FU Week 12FU Week 24
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4893.9100.0100.098.0100.0100.0100.098.0100.095.9100.093.989.889.889.810010095.991.8

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline Who Achieved Normal ALT Levels at the End of Treatment (EOT)

The table below shows the number of participants with abnormal ALT levels at baseline (Day 1) who achieved normalization of ALT levels (defined as an ALT value less than or equal to the Upper Limit of Normality [ie, 40 IU/mL] at EOT). At baseline, 15/49 participants had abnormal ALT levels. (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: EOT (Week 24 or 48)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4811

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (SVR24)

The table below shows the percentage of participants with a SVR24 defined as participants with undetectable plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) at the end of treatment (Week 24 or 48) and at 24 weeks after the last dose of treatment (Week 48 or 72). (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Week 48 or 60

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4889.8

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (SVR12)

The table below shows the percentage of participants with an SVR12 defined as participants with undetectable plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) at the end of treatment (Week 24 or 48) who also had undetectable plasma Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) 12 weeks after the last dose of treatment (Week 36 or 60). (NCT01290731)
Timeframe: Week 36 or 60

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 100 mg 12 Wks + PR24/4895.9

[back to top]

Pre- and Post- Interferon Alpha on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)

Cell associated HIV nucleic acid levels were measured using a single copy assay, and numbers of cells were quantified using a polymerase chain reaction method that detects C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) DNA. (NCT01295515)
Timeframe: week 4 (post) compared to week 0 (pre)

Intervention# of copies of DNA/million cells (Number)
Patient #1 HIV DNA PrePatient #1 HIV DNA PostPatient #2 HIV DNA PrePatient #2 HIV DNA PostPatient #3 HIV DNA PrePatient #3 HIV DNA PostPatient #4 HIV DNA PrePatient #4 HIV DNA PostPatient #5 HIV DNA PrePatient #5 HIV DNA PostPatient #6 HIV DNA PrePatient #6 HIV DNA PostPatient #7 HIV DNA PrePatient #7 HIV DNA Post
Interferon Treatment12007901501506605004003101019520420390460

[back to top]

Fold Change in Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) and Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Genetic Variation in Individuals Undergoing Interferon Therapy

The outcome measure is the fold change in the ratio of HIV RNA to HIV DNA. For the pre and post interferon time point, the level of HIV RNA is divided by the level of HIV DNA and this ratio of the HIV RNA/DNA pre and post interferon is calculated to yield the fold change in HIV RNA/DNA levels. Fold change does not have units. (NCT01295515)
Timeframe: week 4 (post) and week 0 (pre)

Interventionfold change (Number)
Patient #1Patient #2Patient #3Patient #4Patient #5Patient #6Patient #7
Interferon Treatment0.4081.440.6841.122.244.371.05

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Table for Grading Adult Adverse Events.

Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Table for Grading Adult Adverse Events for severity (mild/moderate/severe), expectedness (expected/unexpected), and relatedness to study drug (definitely, probably, possibly, unlikely, or unrelated). (NCT01295515)
Timeframe: Date consent signed to date off study, approximately 66 months and 2 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interferon Treatment7

[back to top]

Pre-and Post- Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) in HIV-infected Individuals

The outcome measure is copies of HIV RNA per ml of plasma. HIV RNA levels are measured using a polymerase chain reaction method. (NCT01295515)
Timeframe: week 4 (post) compared to week 0 (pre)

Interventioncopies/ml (Median)
Patient #1 PrePatient #1 PostPatient #2 PrePatient #2 PostPatient #3 PrePatient #3 PostPatient #4 PrePatient #4 PostPatient #6 PrePatient #6 PostPatient #7 PrePatient #7 Post
Interferon Treatment0.73.80.2.023.80.8.021.51.30.369.18.8

[back to top]

Pre- and Post- Interferon Alpha on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)

Cell associated HIV nucleic acid levels were measured using a single copy assay, and numbers of cells were quantified using a polymerase chain reaction method that detects RNA. (NCT01295515)
Timeframe: week 4 (post) compared to week 0 (pre)

Intervention# of copies of HIV RNA/million cells (Number)
Patient #1 HIV RNA PrePatient #1 HIV RNA PostPatient #2 HIV RNA PrePatient #2 HIV RNA PostPatient #3 HIV RNA PrePatient #3 HIV RNA PostPatient #4 HIV RNA PrePatient #4 HIV RNA PostPatient #5 HIV RNA PrePatient #5 HIV RNA PostPatient #6 HIV RNA PrePatient #6 HIV RNA PostPatient #7 HIV RNA PrePatient #7 HIV RNA Post
Interferon Treatment670180901308104204503901251850300250310

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC24) Post-dose of ABT-267

Blood samples were collected immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose); and at each subsequent study visit. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-267 using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration -time curve (AUC; measured in ng*hr/mL) is a method of measurement of the total exposure of a drug in blood plasma. The AUC24 of ABT-267 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose); and at each subsequent study visit up to Week 12

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV115
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV2200
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV6130

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks (SVR12) Post-pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) Dosing

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Sustained virologic response was defined as HCV RNA levels < the lower limit of quantification (< 25 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the last dose of pegIFN/RBV. Data are reported as the percentage of participants with SVR12. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of pegIFN/RBV

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV66.7
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV66.7
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV60.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV33.3

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of ABT-267

Blood samples were collected immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose). The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-267 using validated analytical methods. The time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax; measured in hours) is the time it takes for a drug to achieve Cmax. The Tmax of ABT-267 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose)

InterventionHours (Mean)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV3.3
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV3.8
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks (SVR24) Post-pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) Dosing

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Sustained virologic response was defined as HCV RNA levels < the lower limit of quantification (< 25 IU/mL) 24 weeks after the last dose of pegIFN/RBV. Data are reported as the percentage of participants with SVR24. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of pegIFN/RBV

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV55.6
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV44.4
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV50.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV22.2

[back to top]

Median Time to Suppression of Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA)

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Time to suppression was defined as the time (measured in days) to HCV RNA levels < the lower limit of quantification (< 25 IU/mL). Data are reported as the median number of days. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Approximately 12 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV27.0
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV16.0
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV21.5
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV84.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Partial Early Virologic Response (pEVR)

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Partial EVR was defined as HCV RNA levels that decreased > 2 log10 IU/mL at Week 12 as compared to baseline HCV RNA levels. Data are reported as the percentage of participants with pEVR. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV100.0
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV88.9
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV90.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV77.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Extended RVR was defined as HCV RNA levels < the lower level of quantification (< 25 IU/mL) at Weeks 4 through 12. Data are reported as the percentage of participants with eRVR. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV77.8
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV77.8
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV80.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV22.2

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Pegylated Interferon (pegIFN)

Blood samples were collected at each study visit from Week 1 to Week 12. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of pegIFN (measured in ng/mL) using validated analytical methods and pegIFN concentrations in serum were summarized at each visit. Data are reported as the median (range). (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: At each study visit from Week 1 to Week 12

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Week 1Week 2Week 4 (n=9, 9, 10, 9)Week 6 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)Week 8 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)Week 12 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV4.307.528.2314.612.115.2
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV7.508.7511.810.99.9114.4
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV6.129.227.729.3510.16.16
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV4.836.878.7610.911.08.91

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Complete EVR was defined as HCV RNA < the lower limit of quantification (< 25 IU/mL) at Week 12. Data are reported as the percentage of participants with cEVR. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV100.0
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV88.9
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV80.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV66.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentrations of Ribavirin (RBV)

Blood samples were collected at each study visit from Week 1 to Week 12. The samples were analyzed for the concentration of RBV (measured in ng/mL) using validated analytical methods and RBV concentrations in plasma were summarized at each visit. Data are reported as the median (range). (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: At each study visit from Week 1 to Week 12

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Week 1Week 2Week 4 (n=8, 8, 10, 9)Week 6 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)Week 8 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)Week 12 (n=8, 9, 9, 9)
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV106014201580178016501800
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV133018901900200020802510
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV147016401680151017101740
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV119013601950190022801940

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With 4-week Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

Plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels (measured in IU/mL) were determined for each sample using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Rapid virologic response was defined as HCV RNA levels < the lower limit of detection (< 15 IU/mL) at Week 4. Data are reported as percentage of participants with RVR. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV33.3
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV55.6
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV70.0
Placebo + pegIFN/RBV22.2

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ABT-267

Blood samples were collected immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose). The samples were analyzed for the concentration of ABT-267 using validated analytical methods. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; measured in ng/mL) is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the plasma after administration in a dosing interval. The Cmax of ABT-267 was estimated using non-compartmental methods and data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. (NCT01314261)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to morning dose (time 0 hours); 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the morning dose on Day 1; and prior to dose on Day 2 (24 hours after Day 1 dose)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
ABT-267 (5 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV10.7
ABT-267 (50 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV148
ABT-267 (200 mg) Once Daily + pegIFN/RBV535

[back to top]

Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions

The total number of new T1 hypointense lesions as assessed by MRI. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
Week 49; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 406
BIIB017 Q2W0.81.5
BIIB017 Q4W1.42.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Serious AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs

AE: any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death (a life threatening event); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could have jeopardized the participant or may have required intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. Data collected after Amendment 3 took effect were excluded for participants enrolled into study 105MS302 on every 4 week dosing, but not excluded for participants enrolled on every 2 week dosing. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventModerate or severe eventSevere eventEvent related to study treatmentSerious eventDiscontinuing study treatment due to an eventWithdrawing from study due to an event
BIIB017 Q2W47834873399902623
BIIB017 Q4W471343744001131814

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities

Data collected after Amendment 3 took effect were excluded for participants enrolled into study 105MS302 on every 4 week dosing, but not excluded for participants enrolled on every 2 week dosing. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
White blood cells < 3.0*10^9/LWhite blood cells ≥ 16.0*10^9/LLymphocytes < 0.8*10^9/LLymphocytes < 0.5*10^9/LLymphocytes > 12*10^9/LSegmented neutrophils ≤ 1*10^9/LSegmented neutrophils < 1.5*10^9/LSegmented neutrophils ≥ 12*10^9/LTotal absolute neutrophils ≤ 1*10^9/LTotal absolute neutrophils < 1.5*10^9/LTotal absolute neutrophils ≥ 12*10^9/LRed blood cells ≤ 3.3*10^12/LRed blood cells ≥ 6.8*10^12/LHemoglobin ≤ 100 g/LPlatelet count ≤ 100*10^9/LPlatelet count ≥ 600*10^9/L
BIIB017 Q2W864627016845158357035112
BIIB017 Q4W281341208311883118103332

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Kidney Function and Other Blood Chemistry

Shift to low includes normal to low, high to low, and unknown to low. Shift to high includes normal to high, low to high, and unknown to high. For participants who switched to alternative MS medications, data after switch and 14 days after last dose of study treatment are excluded. Data collected after Amendment 3 took effect were excluded for participants enrolled into study 105MS302 on every 4 week dosing, but not excluded for participants enrolled on every 2 week dosing. TSH=thyroid stimulating hormone. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (BIIB017 Treatment Baseline from Study 105MS301) up to 4 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Blood urea nitrogen: shift to low; n=529, 546Blood urea nitrogen: shift to high; n=527, 543Creatinine: shift to low; n=529, 547Creatinine: shift to high; n=528, 545Bicarbonate: shift to low; n=523, 540Bicarbonate: shift to high; n=529, 544Sodium: shift to low; n=529, 546Sodium: shift to high; n=524, 544Potassium: shift to low; n=527, 544Potassium: shift to high; n=528, 546Chloride: shift to low; n=529, 546Chloride: shift to high; n=528, 547Glucose: shift to low; n=522, 539Glucose: shift to high; n=506, 513TSH: shift to low; n=515, 533TSH: shift to high; n=518, 539
BIIB017 Q2W12018640346212023513113055
BIIB017 Q4W016015490039131710543044737

[back to top]

Number of Gd-Enhancing Lesions

The number of Gd-enhancing lesions as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
Baseline; n=528, 543Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 407
BIIB017 Q2W0.20.20.2
BIIB017 Q4W0.60.70.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Liver Function Laboratory Values

Shift to low includes normal to low, high to low, and unknown to low. Shift to high includes normal to high, low to high, and unknown to high. For participants who switched to alternative MS medications, data after switch and 14 days after last dose of study treatment are excluded. Data collected after Amendment 3 took effect were excluded for participants enrolled into study 105MS302 on every 4 week dosing, but not excluded for participants enrolled on every 2 week dosing. ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; GGT=gamma-glutamyl transferase. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (BIIB017 Treatment Baseline from Study 105MS301) up to 4 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT: shift to low; n=528, 546ALT: shift to high; n=487, 497AST: shift to low; n=528, 546AST: shift to high; n=514, 530Total bilirubin: shift to low; n=512, 517Total bilirubin: shift to high; n=511, 535GGT: shift to low; n=529, 545GGT: shift to high; n=512, 528Alkaline phosphatase: shift to low; n=522, 543Alkaline phosphatase: shift to high; n=516, 536Lactate dehydrogenase: shift to low; n=529, 547Lactate dehydrogenase: shift to high; n=524, 541
BIIB017 Q2W315381107616697526030
BIIB017 Q4W3119107594221673428018

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline: Urinalysis

Shift to low includes normal to low, high to low, and unknown to low. Shift to high/positive includes normal to high/positive, low to high/positive, negative to high/positive, and unknown to high/positive. For participants who switched to alternative MS medications, data after switch and 14 days after last dose of study treatment are excluded. Data collected after Amendment 3 took effect were excluded for participants enrolled into study 105MS302 on every 4 week dosing, but not excluded for participants enrolled on every 2 week dosing. Pos=positive; RBC=red blood cells; WBC=white blood cells. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (BIIB017 Treatment Baseline from Study 105MS301) up to 4 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Specific gravity: shift to low; n=525, 545Specific gravity: shift to high/pos; n=528,547pH: shift to low; n=529, 547pH: shift to high/pos; n=528, 547Color: shift to high/pos; n=516, 529Blood: shift to high/pos; n=469, 495Glucose: shift to high/pos; n=521, 542Ketones: shift to high/pos; n=510, 530Protein: shift to high/pos; n=380, 391RBC: shift to high/pos; n=419, 402WBC: shift to high/pos; n=472, 495Bilirubin: shift to high/pos; n=529, 547Nitrite: shift to high/pos; n=508, 519Urobilinogen: shift to high/pos; n=529, 546
BIIB017 Q2W130436167257327710613019413
BIIB017 Q4W213063315928642701101160847

[back to top]

Percentage Change of Whole Brain Volume

Percentage change of whole brain volume as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Change at Week 48; n=402, 418Change at Week 96; n=365, 358
BIIB017 Q2W-0.453-0.788
BIIB017 Q4W-0.522-0.835

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Relapsed

Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. New or recurrent neurologic symptoms that occur less than 30 days following the onset of a relapse were considered part of the same relapse. Participants who did not experience a relapse prior to switching to alternative MS medications, withdrew from study, or Amendment 3 (A3) took effect were censored at the time of switch/withdrawal/A3 effective date. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Did not relapseRelapsed
BIIB017 Q2W7723
BIIB017 Q4W7129

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Convenient or Inconvenient Is It to Take Your Medication as Instructed?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question How convenient or inconvenient is it to take your medication as instructed? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely inconvenient) to 10 (extremely convenient). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.08.28.0
BIIB017 Q4W8.28.38.3

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Convenient or Inconvenient Is It to Take Your Medication Every 2 Weeks?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question How convenient or inconvenient is it to take your medication every 2 weeks? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely inconvenient) to 10 (extremely convenient). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.48.48.5
BIIB017 Q4W8.48.68.6

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Likely Would You Be to Continue to Use This Medication?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question How likely would you be to continue to use this medication? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 10 (extremely likely). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.68.38.8
BIIB017 Q4W8.58.18.5

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Injection Frequency (Every 2 Weeks)?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the injection frequency (every 2 weeks)? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.38.38.6
BIIB017 Q4W8.48.58.7

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: How Tolerable or Intolerable Do You Find the Medication?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question How tolerable or intolerable do you find the medication? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely intolerable) to 10 (extremely tolerable). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=425, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W7.07.17.3
BIIB017 Q4W6.87.27.5

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: I Am Satisfied With the Dosing Frequency of This Medication.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement I am satisfied with the dosing frequency (2 times per month) of this medication answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=425, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.58.58.7
BIIB017 Q4W8.48.78.8

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Main Reason for Missed Injections

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question Main reason for missed injections? answer choices were given as medication side effects, injection pain, forget to take medication, tired of taking injections, don't think medication is working, or other. Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Year 1: medication side effects; n=8, 6Year 1: injection pain; n=8, 6Year 1: forget to take medication; n=8, 6Year 1: tired of taking injections; n=8, 6Year 1: don't think medication is working; n=8, 6Year 1: other; n=8, 6Year 2: medication side effects; n=4, 3Year 2: injection pain; n=4, 3Year 2: forget to take medication; n=4, 3Year 2: tired of taking injections; n=4, 3Year 2: don't think medication is working; n=4, 3Year 2: other; n=4, 3Year 3: medication side effects; n=2, 2Year 3: injection pain; n=2, 2Year 3: forget to take medication; n=2, 2Year 3: tired of taking injections; n=2, 2Year 3: don't think medication is working; n=2, 2Year 3: other; n=2, 2
BIIB017 Q2W101004101001000101
BIIB017 Q4W002006101002000101

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Over the Past 4 Weeks, Did You Miss Any of Your Injections?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question Over the past 4 weeks, did you miss any of your injections? answer choices were given as none missed, miss 1 injection, or miss 2 injections. Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Year 1: none missed; n=482, 493Year 1: 1 missed; n=482, 493Year 1: 2 missed; n=482, 493Year 2: none missed; n=426, 429Year 2: 1 missed; n=426, 429Year 2: 2 missed; n=426, 429Year 3: none missed; n=81, 88Year 3: 1 missed; n=81, 88Year 3: 2 missed; n=81, 88
BIIB017 Q2W48742426218611
BIIB017 Q4W47480422317902

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With This Medication?

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the question Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with this medication? answers were numerically rated from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.18.38.6
BIIB017 Q4W7.98.28.2

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: The Twice a Month Dosing Enables Me to Be More Spontaneous and Flexible.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement The twice a month dosing enables me to be more spontaneous and flexible, answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.28.28.4
BIIB017 Q4W8.18.38.5

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: The Twice a Month Dosing Makes It More Convenient for Me to Travel/Vacation.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement The twice a month dosing makes it more convenient for me to travel/vacation, answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W8.28.28.5
BIIB017 Q4W8.28.38.6

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Enables Me to Focus More on Myself and My Family Rather Than My MS.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement This Medication Enables Me to Focus More on Myself and My Family Rather Than My MS, answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 430Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W7.87.88.3
BIIB017 Q4W7.37.88.0

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Improves My Self-Confidence and Self-Reliance.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement This medication improves my self-confidence and self-reliance, answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 429Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W7.77.98.4
BIIB017 Q4W7.57.98.1

[back to top]

Summary of Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction: This Medication Makes It Easy For Me to Carry Out My Daily Responsibilities.

"Participants completed a Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire composed of a range of 14 questions regarding the participant's perception of treatment satisfaction at the end of each year of treatment. For the statement This medication makes it easy for me to carry out my daily responsibilities (ie, going to work, doing household chores or caring for my family), answers were numerically rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Data after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded." (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Year 1; n=482, 496Year 2; n=426, 429Year 3; n=82, 88
BIIB017 Q2W7.77.78.3
BIIB017 Q4W7.47.87.9

[back to top]

Time to Sustained Disability Progression

Estimated proportion of participants with progression and time to progression based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Sustained disability progression is defined as: at least a 1.0 point increase on the EDSS from 105MS302 baseline EDSS ≥ 1.0 that is sustained for 24 weeks, or at least a 1.5 point increase on the EDSS from 105MS302 baseline EDSS = 0 that is sustained for 24 weeks. The EDSS measures the disability status of people with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10. The range of main categories include (0) = normal neurologic exam; to (5) = ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 meters; disability severe enough to impair full daily activities; to (10) = death due to MS. Participants were censored at the time of withdrawal/switch/A3 effective date if they withdrew from study, switched to alternative MS medication, or Amendment 3 took effect without a progression. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 24, 28, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Progressed at 12 weeksProgressed at 24 weeksProgressed at 48 weeksProgressed at 72 weeksProgressed at 96 weeksProgressed at 120 weeksProgressed at 144 weeksProgressed at 168 weeks
BIIB017 Q2W0.0070.0230.0450.0570.0690.0850.096NA
BIIB017 Q4W0.0230.0460.0790.1030.1150.1470.161NA

[back to top]

Volume of Gd-Enhancing Lesions

The volume of Gd-enhancing lesions as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Baseline; n=528, 543Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 407
BIIB017 Q2W0.03480.04770.0357
BIIB017 Q4W0.09110.11720.1346

[back to top]

Volume of T1 Hypointense Lesions

The volume of T1 hypointense lesions as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Baseline; n=528, 543Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 407
BIIB017 Q2W3.63203.65293.7494
BIIB017 Q4W3.98694.30624.3171

[back to top]

Volume of T2 Hyperintense Lesions

The volume of T2 hyperintense lesions as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Baseline; n=528, 543Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 407
BIIB017 Q2W9.96789.83359.9487
BIIB017 Q4W11.474211.742112.0257

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index Score

The EQ-5D is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Scores of 1, 2, or 3 are possible responses for each of 5 questions (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=severe problems). A scoring formula developed by the EuroQol Group is then used to assign utility values for each participant's Health State Profile. A summary index score (EQ-5D index score) is derived from the 5 questions by conversion with this scoring formula and a table of scores. EQ-5D Summary Index values ranged from -0.6 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=527, 544Change at Week 24; n=514, 534Change at Week 48; n=498, 510Change at Week 72; n=472, 491Change at Week 96; n=436, 452Change at Week 120; n=193, 205Change at Week 144; n=88, 98Change at Week 168; n=21, 26
BIIB017 Q2W0.760.000.000.00-0.010.000.010.02
BIIB017 Q4W0.760.00-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.020.000.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where 100 is the 'best imaginable health state' and 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state.' The scale was normalized to a scale of 0 to 1, with higher values indicating a better health state. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=527, 542Change at Week 24; n=511, 532Change at Week 48; n=498, 508Change at Week 72; n=472, 490Change at Week 96; n=436, 450Change at Week 120; n=193, 204Change at Week 144; n=88, 97Change at Week 168; n=21, 26
BIIB017 Q2W77.33-0.98-0.93-1.89-2.20-0.88-0.870.46
BIIB017 Q4W77.07-0.22-0.81-0.59-1.10-0.47-0.311.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS)

The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. MCS computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=527, 544Change at Week 24; n=514, 535Change at Week 48; n=498, 510Change at Week 72; n=474, 491Change at Week 96; n=437, 452Change at Week 120; n=193, 205Change at Week 144; n=88, 98Change at Week 168; n=20, 26
BIIB017 Q2W48.591-0.734-0.690-0.1620.0140.6160.1100.294
BIIB017 Q4W47.8030.3960.4090.242-0.141-1.2230.346-0.451

[back to top]

Number of Relapses Requiring IV Steroid Use

Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionrelapses (Number)
BIIB017 Q4W217
BIIB017 Q2W181

[back to top] [back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. The annualized relapse rate is calculated as the total number of relapses occurred during the period for all participants, divided by the total number of person-years followed in the period. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionrelapses per person-years (Number)
BIIB017 Q4W0.189
BIIB017 Q2W0.142

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Change from Baseline in disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The EDSS measures the disability status of people with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10. The range of main categories include (0) = normal neurologic exam; to (5) = ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 meters; disability severe enough to impair full daily activities; to (10) = death due to MS. Data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=516, 535Change at Week 12; n=503, 524Change at Week 24; n=500, 519Change at Week 48; n=488, 497Change at Week 72; n=468, 484Change at Week 96; n=429, 446Change at Week 120; n=187, 205Change at Week 144; n=90, 98Change at Week 168; n=21, 25
BIIB017 Q2W2.350.000.000.030.060.090.100.100.18
BIIB017 Q4W2.430.020.020.080.130.150.190.230.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 Physical Score

The 29-item MSIS-29 is a disease-specific participant-reported outcome measure that has been developed and validated to examine the physical and psychological impact of MS from a patient's perspective; it measures 20 physical items and 9 psychological items. Responses use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. All questions are to be answered. The physical well being assessment portion of the MSIS-29 consists of 20 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 20-100. A lower total score indicates less physically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater physically-related impact on a participant's functioning. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=527, 544Change at Week 24; n=513, 534Change at Week 48; n=498, 510Change at Week 72; n=474, 491Change at Week 96; n=437, 452Change at Week 120; n=193, 205Change at Week 144; n=88, 98Change at Week 168; n=20, 26
BIIB017 Q2W20.2180.5520.5450.6841.1900.1160.051-0.288
BIIB017 Q4W20.494-0.1520.4620.9371.4712.6540.3272.250

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS)

The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. PCS was computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=527, 544Change at Week 24; n=514, 535Change at Week 48; n=498, 510Change at Week 72; n=474, 491Change at Week 96; n=437, 452Change at Week 120; n=193, 205Change at Week 144; n=88, 98Change at Week 168; n=20, 26
BIIB017 Q2W44.9020.3370.214-0.169-0.1380.0210.1180.152
BIIB017 Q4W45.1540.138-0.351-0.270-0.150-0.118-0.256-1.558

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

SDMT is a screening test for cognitive impairment. Participants are given 90 seconds in which to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures using a key. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 110 (best). (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Baseline (start of 105MS302), Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=523, 543Change at Week 24; n=508, 530Change at Week 48; n=493, 509Change at Week 72; n=472, 489Change at Week 96; n=435, 450Change at Week 120; n=190, 203Change at Week 144; n=88, 96Change at Week 168; n=21, 25
BIIB017 Q2W52.744-1.106-0.864-1.012-0.231-1.099-0.906-3.840
BIIB017 Q4W52.134-0.313-0.365-0.625-0.340-1.305-1.727-4.000

[back to top]

Number of New Active Lesions

The number of new active lesions as assessed by MRI. Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 406
BIIB017 Q2W2.03.9
BIIB017 Q4W4.49.0

[back to top]

Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions

The total number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions (from Study 105MS302 Baseline) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Observed data after participants switched to alternative MS medications or after Amendment 3 took effect are excluded. (NCT01332019)
Timeframe: Week 48, Week 96

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
Week 48; n=481, 493Week 96; n=411, 407
BIIB017 Q2W1.93.9
BIIB017 Q4W4.48.9

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Spatial Recall Test (SPART) Raw Score

Spatial Recall Test (SPART) for visuospatial learning and delayed recall.Spatial Recall Test (10/36): The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall (10/36-D). A checkerboard with ten checkers arranged in a pattern is shown to the subject for ten seconds. The subject is then asked to reproduce the same pattern with ten checkers on an empty checkerboard. The test includes three consecutive trials. The score is the total number of correct responses for the tree trials. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod1.46
Interferon Beta 1b3.06

[back to top]

Change From Screening in the Volume of Total T1 Hypointense Lesions

Volume of hypointense post-gadolinium T1 lesion component was measured by MRI scan. Means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) by-visit interaction. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Fingolimod391.96
Interferon Beta 1b213.93

[back to top]

Change From Screening in the Percentage of Brain Volume Change

Calculations of brain volume change were performed using the structural image evaluation of normalized atrophy (SIENA), software included in the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) software library. SIENA is a fully automated method for estimating temporal brain volume change. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

Interventionpercentage of brain volume (Mean)
Fingolimod-0.60
Interferon Beta 1b-0.96

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Word List Generation (WLG)

Word List Generation (COWAT/WLG): The COWAT assesses verbal fluency on semantic stimulus by asking the patient to produce as many words as possible belonging to a semantic category. The test assessed the verbal fluency, recorded all the possible correct word that a patients should give in 90 sec. No maximum range is available. Higher values represent a better outcome. The score was the number of correct words. The more words the patient pronounces, the better it is. We can imagine that the minimum value might be zero words, , but it is not a score scale. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod0.39
Interferon Beta 1b0.24

[back to top]

Change From Screening in the Volume of Total T2 Lesions

Change in volume of total T2-weighted lesions by visit were summarized. Negative values indicate improvement (reduction in lesion volume) and positive values worsening (increase in lesion volume (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1 month), 18 months

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Fingolimod176.25
Interferon Beta 1b711.81

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-D) Raw Score

The tests SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). The Delayed SRT test is the total number of words recalled after a delayed period. The total score ranged from 0 to 12. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod0.57
Interferon Beta 1b0.39

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Consistent Long Term Retrieval (SRT-CLTR) Raw Score

Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB)- widely used as a clinical and research tool, with 68% sensitivity and 85% specificity. It consists of the serial administration of 5 tests. One of the tests is SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total of the words in LTS of all six trials is then summed. If a word in LTS is consistently recalled on all subsequent trials, it is then scored as Consistent Long Term Retrieval (CLTR). The total of the words in CLTR of all six trials is summed. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod5.93
Interferon Beta 1b3.96

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 3 Seconds (PASAT 3) Raw Score

Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The patient hears a series of numbers from recordings that are presented at the rate of one every 3 seconds in the first part of the test (PASAT-3). The patient is asked to add each consecutive digit to the one immediately preceding it. Sixty-one digits are presented for each part, and each part has a maximum of 60 correct answers. The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod7.14
Interferon Beta 1b6.68

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 2 (PASAT 2) Raw Score

Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The patient hears a series of numbers from recordings that are presented at the rate of one every 2 seconds in the second part of the test (PASAT-2). The patient was asked to add each consecutive digit to the one immediately preceding it. Sixty-one digits are presented for each part, and each part has a maximum of 60 correct answers. The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod4.79
Interferon Beta 1b4.42

[back to top]

Change From Screening in DKEFS Condition 2: Sort Recognition, Sort Recognition Description Score- Card Set 1+2

The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System - Sorting Test is one of the nine tests presented in the DKEFS manual and explores the patient's executive abilities. It has a standard form (version A, administered at screening and Month-18 visit) and an alternate form (version B, administered at Month-9 visit). The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. Free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod2.15
Interferon Beta 1b7.38

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS had a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (depressive symptoms absent) to 60 (numerically highest level of depressive symptoms). (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod-0.77
Interferon Beta 1b0.13

[back to top]

Change From Screening in the Number of New T2 Lesions

New T2 lesions at a specific visit were assessed relative to the previous visit scan. The total number of lesions (visit 8 to 18 month) is calculated as the sum of the number of lesions. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionNumber of new lesions (Mean)
Fingolimod1.25
Interferon Beta 1b3.33

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Raw Score

Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) for sustained attention and information processing speed. It presents a series of nine symbols, each of which is paired with a single digit labeled 1-9 in a key at the top of the sheet. The reminder of the page has a pseudo-randomized sequence of symbols, and the patient must respond with the digit associated with each of these as quickly as possible. The score is the number of correct answers in 90 seconds. The total score ranged from 0 to 110. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod2.19
Interferon Beta 1b3.93

[back to top]

Change From Screening in DKEFS Condition 1: Free Sorting, Free Sorting, Description Score, Card Set 1+2

The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System - Sorting Test is one of the nine tests presented in the DKEFS manual and explores the patient's executive abilities. It has a standard form (version A, administered at screening and Month-18 visit) and an alternate form (version B, administered at Month-9 visit). The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) was obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod1.52
Interferon Beta 1b3.69

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Condition 1: Free Sorting, Confirmed Correct Sort- Card Set 1+2

The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System - Sorting Test is one of the nine tests presented in the DKEFS manual and explores the patient's executive abilities. It has a standard form (version A, administered at screening and Month-18 visit) and an alternate form (version B, administered at Month-9 visit). The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. The DKFES test consisted of two testing procedures: free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) was obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranged from 0 to 16. Higher values represent a better outcome (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod0.57
Interferon Beta 1b0.82

[back to top]

Changes in Quality of Life, by Means of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQoL-54)

A 54 question measure covers 12 domains; assesses mental and physical health. The physical health composite score is a weighted average of the physical health scales, such as physical function, health perceptions, and energy. The mental health composite score is a weighted average of the mental health scales, such as overall quality of life, cognitive function, and health distress. Each domain has a range from 0 to 100 where higher means better. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

,
InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
Mental health composite scorePhysical health composite score
Fingolimod4.76-1.80
Interferon Beta 1b-2.31-4.75

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Selective Reminding Test - Long-Term Storage (SRT-LTS) Raw Score

Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB)- widely used as a clinical and research tool, with 68% sensitivity and 85% specificity. It consists of the serial administration of 5 tests. One of the tests is SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total of the words in LTS of all six trials is then summed. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

Interventionraw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod6.32
Interferon Beta 1b4.46

[back to top]

Change From Screening in the Number of T1 Gd+ Enhancing Lesions

Total number of post-baseline Gd-enhanced lesions is calculated as a sum of all Gd-enhanced lesions seen on post-baseline scans per visit. Real (not per slice) lesions are counted in this analysis (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionNumber of new lesions (Mean)
Fingolimod-0.64
Interferon Beta 1b0.59

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Spatial Recall Test - Delayed Recall (SPART-D)

Spatial Recall Test (SPART) for visuospatial learning and delayed recall.Spatial Recall Test (10/36): The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall (10/36-D). A checkerboard with ten checkers arranged in a pattern was shown to the subject for ten seconds. The subject was then asked to reproduce the same pattern with ten checkers on an empty checkerboard. The test includes three consecutive trials. The score was the total number of correct responses for the tree trials. The total score ranged from 0 to 10. Higher values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Screening (-1month), 18 month

InterventionRaw score (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod0.41
Interferon Beta 1b0.44

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (mFIS, Total Score and Scores of the 3 Individual Domains).

Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (mFIS) questionnaire is described at each time point to evaluate fatigue by means of usual descriptive statistics. Three domains were also defined: Physical Subscale (sum of items 4, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21 and therefore ranging from 0 to 36), Cognitive Subscale (sum of items 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19 and therefore ranging from 0 to 40) and Psychosocial Subscale (sum of items 8, 9 and therefore ranging from 0 to 8). Finally, mFIS - overall score ranged from 0 to 80. The mFIS total score was computed as the sum of scores for each item. Lower values represent a better outcome. (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
Fingolimod2.36
Interferon Beta 1b6.67

[back to top]

Changes in the Environmental Status Scale Score (ESS)

The Environmental Status Scale (ESS) is used to quickly evaluate a patient for handicap. It was derived from a measure of socio-economic status. It consists of seven parameters: (1) actual work status, (2) financial and economic status, (3) personal residence or home, (4) personal assistance required, (5) transportation, (6) community services, (7) social activity. Each parameter has a single score from minimum 0 to maximum 5. ESS score is the sum of the points for all 7 parameters: minimum score: 0; maximum score: 35. The higher the score the greater the handicap (NCT01333501)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 month

InterventionScore (Mean)
Fingolimod1.08
Interferon Beta 1b0.91

[back to top]

Median Time to First Achievement of Undetectable HCV RNA During Treatment

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. Undetectable HCV RNA (target not detected [TND]) was defined as below the 9.3 IU/ml limit of detection. Kaplan Meier summary statistics were calculated for each treatment arm. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication until first achievement of undetectable HCV RNA (up to 48 weeks of treatment)

Interventiondays (Median)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg22.0
Grazoprevir 100 mg15.0
Grazoprevir 200 mg28.0
Grazoprevir 400 mg16.0
Grazoprevir 800 mg16.5
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg27.0
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg29.0
Boceprevir 800 mg57.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, was also an AE. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: Treatment period plus the first 14 days of follow-up (up to 50 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg34
Grazoprevir 100 mg65
Grazoprevir 200 mg66
Grazoprevir 400 mg23
Grazoprevir 800 mg28
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg42
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg35
Boceprevir 800 mg64

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Early Viral Response (cEVR)

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. The Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test, v2.0 assay (High Pure System) had a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL (in plasma). cEVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (target not detected [TND]) at Week 12. 95% confidence intervals provided based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of treatment with grazoprevir/boceprevir

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg94.4
Grazoprevir 100 mg80.3
Grazoprevir 200 mg85.3
Grazoprevir 400 mg87.5
Grazoprevir 800 mg75.9
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg86.0
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg86.1
Boceprevir 800 mg69.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Rapid Viral Response (RVR)

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. The Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test, v2.0 assay (High Pure System) had a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL (in plasma). RVR was defined as undetectable (TND) HCV RNA at Week 4 of study therapy. 95% confidence intervals provided based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of treatment with grazoprevir/boceprevir

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg72.2
Grazoprevir 100 mg90.9
Grazoprevir 200 mg91.2
Grazoprevir 400 mg87.5
Grazoprevir 800 mg86.2
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg81.4
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg83.3
Boceprevir 800 mg59.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the End of Study Therapy (SVR12)

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. The Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test, v2.0 assay (High Pure System) had a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL (in plasma). SVR12 was defined as undetectable (TND) HCV RNA at 12 weeks after the end of all study therapy. 95% confidence intervals provided based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the end of all treatment (up to 60 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg72.2
Grazoprevir 100 mg89.4
Grazoprevir 200 mg91.2
Grazoprevir 400 mg87.5
Grazoprevir 800 mg79.3
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg93.0
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg91.7
Boceprevir 800 mg60.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the End of Study Therapy (SVR24)

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. The Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test, v2.0 assay (High Pure System) had a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL (in plasma). SVR24 was defined as undetectable (TND) HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the end of all study therapy. 95% confidence intervals provided based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the end of all treatment (up to 72 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg72.2
Grazoprevir 100 mg86.4
Grazoprevir 200 mg92.6
Grazoprevir 400 mg87.5
Grazoprevir 800 mg79.3
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg93.0
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg91.7
Boceprevir 800 mg57.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 72

Blood was drawn from each participant to assess Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) plasma levels using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0 at various time points prior to, during, and after dosing. Undetectable HCV RNA (target not detected [TND]) was defined as below the 9.3 IU/ml limit of detection. 95% confidence intervals provided based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg69.4
Grazoprevir 100 mg80.3
Grazoprevir 200 mg86.8
Grazoprevir 400 mg87.5
Grazoprevir 800 mg75.9
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg79.1
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg83.3
Boceprevir 800 mg54.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Medication Due to AEs During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, was also an AE. (NCT01353911)
Timeframe: Treatment period plus the first 14 days of follow-up (up to 50 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
OL Grazoprevir 100 mg2
Grazoprevir 100 mg3
Grazoprevir 200 mg4
Grazoprevir 400 mg2
Grazoprevir 800 mg3
Grazoprevir 400 mg/100 mg4
Grazoprevir 800 mg/100 mg2
Boceprevir 800 mg9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Local Platelet Count by Visit During Treatment Period A1 of Core Study

Missing platelet counts were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach for subjects who achieved platelet response at prior visits. (NCT01355289)
Timeframe: Day 7 and Day 14

,,,
Interventioncells x 10^9/L (Mean)
Day 7Day 14
Avatrombopag 10 mg (Core Study)19.829.2
Avatrombopag 20 mg (Core Study)26.557.2
Avatrombopag 30 mg (Core Study)30.955.4
Placebo (Core Study)-0.1-0.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Initiated Antiviral Treatment by Day 21 of Period A1 of Core Study

Blood draws were taken to monitor platelet counts during the first 21 days of study treatment. When a platelet count of greater than or equal to 100 X 10^9/L was attained, antiviral treatment was initiated. (NCT01355289)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 21

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Avatrombopag 10 mg (Core Study)610
Avatrombopag 20 mg (Core Study)135
Avatrombopag 30 mg (Core Study)95
Placebo (Core Study)116

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Response (Greater Than or Equal to 100 x 10^9/L) by Day 21 of Treatment Period A1 of Core Study

A responder was defined as a participant having a platelet count of greater than or equal to 100x10^9/L by Day 21 starting from an average baseline platelet count of greater than 20 x 10^9/L to less than or equal to 70 x 10^9/L. (NCT01355289)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 21

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Avatrombopag 10 mg (Core Study)610
Avatrombopag 20 mg (Core Study)126
Avatrombopag 30 mg (Core Study)95
Placebo (Core Study)116

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Count Greater Than 30 X 10^9/L From Baseline to Day 21 During Treatment Period A1 of Core Study

Blood draws were taken to monitor platelet counts. (NCT01355289)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 21

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Avatrombopag 10 mg (Core Study)97
Avatrombopag 20 mg (Core Study)162
Avatrombopag 30 mg (Core Study)113
Placebo (Core Study)116

[back to top]

AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, When SVR12=NO

The number of participants with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in normal range post treatment when patients do not have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment, up to 60 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=NOBL normal to SVR12 normalBL elevated to SVR12 normalNo AST data available at SVR12 visit
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks9613627
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks9414330
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks24366
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks30336
Partial:Placebo280023
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks301427
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks311063
Relapser:Placebo420233

[back to top]

ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, SVR12=YES

The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in normal range post treatment when patients have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment, up to 60 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=YESBL normal to SVR12 normalBL elevated to SVR12 normalNo ALT data available at SVR12 visit
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks4913321
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks4610350
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks3313200
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks2510110
Partial:Placebo1010
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks6931351
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks7231380
Relapser:Placebo7331

[back to top]

AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=YES

The number of participants with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in normal range at the end of treatment (EoT) when patients have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: End of treatment, up to 48 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=YESBL normal to EoT normalBL elevated to EoT normalNo EoT data available for AST
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks4915211
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks4616200
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks3313100
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks251091
Partial:Placebo1010
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks6935240
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks7239220
Relapser:Placebo7241

[back to top]

Early Treatment Success (ETS)

Percentage of participants with early Treatment Success (ETS) defined as a plasma HCV RNA level <25 IU/mL (undetected or detected) at Week 4 and <25 IU/mL (undetected) at Week 8. (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relapser:Placebo4.1
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks85.9
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks87.4
Partial:Placebo3.4
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks66.7
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks76.4
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks58.6
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks51.4

[back to top]

Virological Response After 24 Weeks of Treatment Discontinuation (SVR24)

Percentage of participants with virological response after 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation (SVR24) defined as plasma Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level <25 IU/mL (undetected) 24 weeks after the originally planned treatment duration. (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post treatment, up to 72 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relapser & Partial: Placebo10.3
Relapser & Partial: Faldaprevir 12 Weeks63.5
Relapser & Partial: Faldaprevir 24 Weeks59.5
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks33.8
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks32.9

[back to top]

ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, When SVR12=NO

The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in normal range post treatment when patients do not have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment, up to 60 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=NOBL normal to SVR12 normalBL elevated to SVR12 normalNo ALT data available at SVR12 visit
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks9611727
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks946930
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks24246
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks30435
Partial:Placebo280023
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks30967
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks31663
Relapser:Placebo420133

[back to top]

ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=NO

The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in normal range at the end of treatment (EoT) when patients do not have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: End of treatment, up to 48 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=NOBL normal to EoT normalBL elevated to EoT normalNo EoT data available for ALT
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks9615341
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks9414380
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks244140
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks30461
Partial:Placebo28390
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks309100
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks316140
Relapser:Placebo429151

[back to top]

ALT Normalisation: ALT in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=YES

The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in normal range at the end of treatment when patients have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: End of treatment, up to 48 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=YESBL normal to EoT normalBL elevated to EoT normal
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks491223
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks46927
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks331014
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks2588
Partial:Placebo101
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks693029
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks723026
Relapser:Placebo734

[back to top]

AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range at End of Treatment, When SVR12=NO

The number of participants with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in normal range at the end of treatment when patients do not have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: End of treatment, up to 48 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=NOBL normal to EoT normalBL elevated to EoT normal
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks961824
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks942128
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks24314
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks3056
Partial:Placebo2849
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks30165
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks31129
Relapser:Placebo42195

[back to top]

AST Normalisation: AST in Normal Range 12 Weeks Post Treatment, SVR12=YES

The number of participants with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in normal range post treatment when patients have sustained virological response 12 weeks post treatment. BL=baseline (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment, up to 60 weeks

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SVR12=YESBL normal to SVR12 normalBL elevated to SVR12 normalNo AST data available at SVR12 visit
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks4916281
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks4617250
Partial:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks3316160
Partial:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks251380
Partial:Placebo1010
Relapser:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks6936291
Relapser:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks7241280
Relapser:Placebo7241

[back to top]

Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR12)

Percentage of participants with sustained virological response (SVR12) 12 weeks post treatment defined as plasma Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level <25 IU/mL (undetected) 12 weeks after the originally planned treatment duration. (NCT01358864)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment, up to 60 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relapser & Partial: Placebo10.3
Relapser & Partial: Faldaprevir 12 Weeks65.4
Relapser & Partial: Faldaprevir 24 Weeks61.4
Null:Faldaprevir 12 Weeks33.8
Null:Faldaprevir 24 Weeks32.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall Response Rate (ORR) included Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR).~Complete Response (CR) was defined as disappearance of all symptoms and signs of all measurable disease, lasting for at least four weeks, without appearance of new lesions.~Partial Response (PR) was defined as a > 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions, lasting for at least four weeks, without appearance of new lesions or enlargement of existing lesions." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 18 weeks from start of therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine32
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine33
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon34
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine31

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of progression of disease or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, or date of last follow-up for patients without progression and alive at the end of the study.~PFS curves were estimated with the Kaplan - Meier (K-M) method and treatments were compared with a two-sided log-rank test." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine2.7
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine2.5
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon2.8
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine2.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last follow-up for living patients.~OS curves were estimated with the Kaplan - Meier (K-M) method and treatments were compared with a two - sided log - rank test." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine7.9
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine8.6
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon9.1
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine7.7

[back to top]

Treatment Efficacy

The primary outcome measure is the number of patients with undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks post end of treatment (SVR12) following directly observed PEG-IFN alfa-2b in combination with self-administered ribavirin for 12 weeks in participants with non-quantifiable (<15 IU/ml detected and <15 IU/ml undetected) HCV RNA or undetectable HCV RNA on qualitative assay at week 4 of therapy and for 24 weeks in participants with quantifiable (≥15 IU/ml) HCV RNA or detectable HCV RNA on qualitative assay at week 4 of therapy. (NCT01364090)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Treatment Duration (24 Weeks)10
Shortened Treatment Duration (12 Weeks)51
Discontinued Prior to RVR0

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline

Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b-1.60

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b-2.20

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline

Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.40

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.40

[back to top]

Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline

Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.14

[back to top]

Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.06

[back to top]

Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline

Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b-0.02

[back to top]

Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.00

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With a Visual Loss of 15 or More Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letters in the Study Eye

Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Interferon Gamma-1b0

[back to top]

Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

InterventionETDRS Letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b3.20

[back to top]

Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline

Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

InterventionETDRS Letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b1.60

[back to top]

Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline

Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

InterventionETDRS Letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.20

[back to top]

Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionµm (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b30.20

[back to top]

Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

InterventionETDRS Letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b4.00

[back to top]

Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline

Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionµm (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b12.00

[back to top]

Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline

Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Week

Interventionµm (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b-38.60

[back to top]

Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline

Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. (NCT01376362)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

Interventionµm (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b-47.40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) With rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms at Baseline in the Interleukin-28B Gene

SVR12 was defined as Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA levels NCT01389323)
Timeframe: Post-treatment Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Wild Type (CC) (n=20, 24, 10)Heterozygous (CT) (n=58, 69, 17)Minor Homozygous (TT) (n=50, 14, 3)
Black/African American Cohort80.053.436.0
Latino Cohort70.850.764.3
White Non-Latino Cohort80.058.866.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels

The limit of detection for HCV RNA levels was 10 IU/mL and the LLOQ was 25 IU/mL. Data for post-treatment Weeks 36 and 48 were based on participants who had achieved virologic response (defined as HCV RNA levels NCT01389323)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12; both Weeks 4 and 12; end-of-treatment (up to 48 weeks), or post-treatment Week 24

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Both Weeks 4 and 12EOTPost-treatment Week 24
Black/African American Cohort32.864.177.376.676.671.168.073.446.9
Latino Cohort44.972.085.081.381.380.477.679.457.0
White Non-Latino Cohort33.360.066.780.076.776.756.793.363.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels

The limit of detection for HCV RNA levels was 10 IU/mL and the LLOQ was 25 IU/mL. For analysis purpose, participants were assigned to following 3 race/ethnicity cohorts: Black/African American, Latino, and White non-Latino. Some participants were represented in more than one race/ethnicity cohort. (NCT01389323)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12; both Weeks 4 and 12; end-of-treatment (up to 48 weeks), or post-treatment Weeks 12 and 24

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Both Weeks 4 and 12EOTPost-treatment Week 12Post-treatment Week 24
Black/African American Cohort6.328.164.168.870.364.155.571.150.846.9
Latino Cohort12.127.168.275.773.874.858.978.555.155.1
White Non-Latino Cohort6.730.050.066.766.766.743.393.363.363.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA levels NCT01389323)
Timeframe: Post-treatment Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Black/African American Cohort50.8
Latino Cohort57.0
White Non-Latino Cohort66.7

[back to top]

Geometric Mean of Titers (GMT) Ratio Post/Pre Vaccination

(NCT01403376)
Timeframe: pre vaccination (baseline) and 28 days post vaccination

,,
Interventionratio post/pre vaccination (Geometric Mean)
H1N1 strainH3N2 strainB strain
IFN-β-13.44.14.7
Teriflunomide 14 mg2.32.63.0
Teriflunomide 7 mg2.52.63.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With 2 Fold or More Increase in Antibody Titer at 28 Days Post Vaccination

Percentages of participants with an increase from baseline of 2-fold or more in antibody titers and 90% CIs using normal approximation were calculated for each strain and treatment group. (NCT01403376)
Timeframe: pre vaccination (baseline) and 28 days post vaccination

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
H1N1 strainH3N2 strainB strain
IFN-β-146.551.258.1
Teriflunomide 14 mg30.841.051.3
Teriflunomide 7 mg35.035.047.5

[back to top]

Immunoglobulin Levels

(NCT01403376)
Timeframe: pre vaccination (baseline) and 28 days post vaccination

,,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Immunoglobulin M - pre vaccinationImmunoglobulin M - 28-day post vaccinationImmunoglobulin G - pre vaccinationImmunoglobulin G - 28-day post vaccinationImmunoglobulin A - pre vaccinationImmunoglobulin A - 28-day post vaccination
IFN-β-11.141.1612.0312.252.272.33
Teriflunomide 14 mg1.231.279.129.091.511.50
Teriflunomide 7 mg1.281.309.359.571.651.63

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With 4 Fold or More Increase in Antibody Titer at 28 Days Post Vaccination

Percentages of participants with an increase from baseline of 4-fold or more in antibody titers and 90% CIs using normal approximation were calculated for each strain and treatment group. (NCT01403376)
Timeframe: pre vaccination (baseline) and 28 days post vaccination

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
H1N1 strainH3N2 strainB strain
IFN-β-139.541.951.2
Teriflunomide 14 mg20.523.130.8
Teriflunomide 7 mg22.525.037.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Antibody Titer ≥40 at 28 Days Post Vaccination

"For each viral strain (H1N1, H3N2, and B), the antibody titer, level of antibodies in blood sample when exposed to antigen, was calculated as the mean of two replicates. If the titer was below or above the limit of detection, the threshold value was used.~The percentage of participants achieving a titer of 40 or more, as well as the 90% confidence interval (CI) using normal approximation were calculated for each strain and treatment group." (NCT01403376)
Timeframe: 28 days post vaccination

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
H1N1 strainH3N2 strainB strain
IFN-β-197.790.793.0
Teriflunomide 14 mg97.476.997.4
Teriflunomide 7 mg97.590.097.5

[back to top]

Participants' Response

Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all clinical evidence of active tumors for a minimum of 8 weeks. Partial Response (PR): 50% or greater decrease in sum of products all measured lesions persisting for at least 4 weeks. No Change: Steady state or change of +/- 25% of tumor size and no progression for minimum of 8 weeks with no appearance of new lesions. Progressive Disease: > 25 % increase in size of any measurable lesion or appearance of significant new lesions. (NCT01404936)
Timeframe: After 6 courses (3 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseUncomfirmed Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive Disease
Interferon-2A + Chemotherapy23231

[back to top]

Drug Exposure

Total number of patients receiving treatment over specified time intervals. (NCT01405027)
Timeframe: End of treatment up to treatment week 48

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Days 1-7Days 8-14Days 15-28Days 29-56Days 57-84Days 85-168Days 169-252Days >252
Group A - HCEE8484838178734926
Group B - Community Sites113112110108100917530

[back to top]

Determination of the Rate of Sustained Viral Response (SVR) for HCV Patients Treated With Boceprevir, Peginterferon and Ribavirin at Community Sites and at HCEEs.

Rate of SVR was defined as the percentage of participants with HCV-RNA undetectable at follow-up Week 24. All percentages were based on the total number of participants originally randomized/enrolled to that particular arm. (NCT01405027)
Timeframe: Follow-up week 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Negative (percent)Positive (percent)Missing (percent)
Group A - HCEE48.823.827.4
Group B - Community Sites46.026.527.4

[back to top]

Treatment Duration Compliance Rate

The primary objective will be to define treatment duration compliance rate (calculated as the actual treatment duration in weeks divided by the expected duration in weeks) based on individual patient treatment goals as defined in the OPTIMAL protocol for HCV patients treated with boceprevir, peginterferon and ribavirin for up to 48 weeks. Rates will be reported for HCEEs (Group A) and community sites enrolled in the Program (Group B). (NCT01405027)
Timeframe: End of treatment up to treatment week 48

InterventionPercentage of compliance (Mean)
Group A - HCEE85.4
Group B - Community Sites83.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Description of the adverse events and rate of events of boceprevir, peginterferon and ribavirin in HCV patients treated at community sites and at HCEEs (NCT01405027)
Timeframe: Throughout entire study, at end of treatment and follow up week 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group A - HCEE77
Group B - Community Sites95

[back to top]

Short Form Health Survey Measuring Quality of Life Reported at Baseline, End of Treatment, and Follow-up Week 24 (36 Multiple Choice Questions)

"Determination of the quality of life for HCV patients treated with boceprevir, peginterferon and ribavirin at community sites and at HCEEs.~Patient scores per subscale (8) were obtained by subtracting the lowest possible raw score from the actual raw score x 100, divided by the lowest possible raw score subtracted from the highest possible raw score. Subscale scores were averaged (with standard deviation) for Group A and Group B. Composite Scores are standardized to the general US population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher score = improved quality of life." (NCT01405027)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, follow-up week 24

,
Interventionscore (Mean)
Physical Component Score - baselinePhysical Component Score - End of treatmentPhysical Component Score - Follow-up weekMental Component Score - BaselineMental Component Score - End of treatmentMental Component Score - Follow-up weekPhysical Functioning - BaselinePhysical Functioning - End of treatmentPhysical Functioning - Follow-up weekPhysical Role Functioning - BaselinePhysical Role Functioning - End of treatmentPhysical Role Functioning - Follow-up weekBodily Pain - BaselineBodily Pain - End of treatmentBodily Pain - Follow-up weekGeneral Health - BaselineGeneral Health - End of treatmentGeneral Health - Follow-up weekVitality - BaselineVitality - End of treatmentVitality - Follow-up weekSocial Functioning - BaselineSocial Functioning - End of treatmentSocial Functioning - Follow-up weekEmotional Role Functioning - BaselineEmotional Role Functioning - End of treatmentEmotional Role Functioning - Follow-up weekMental Health - BaselineMental Health - End of treatmentMental Health - Follow-up week
Group A - HCEE44.642.949.252.245.354.876.168.384.271.047.180.763.165.176.767.765.974.657.544.671.782.466.089.886.661.185.676.469.583.3
Group B - Community Sites45.543.749.451.445.251.977.170.382.368.047.081.868.966.073.865.769.074.058.243.065.782.867.987.280.364.282.076.668.577.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ocrelizumab

Number of participants positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to ocrelizumab is the number of post- baseline evaluable participants determined to have treatment-induced ADA or treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive sample at baseline (n= 407, 402)Positive for ADA post-baseline (n= 403, 405)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC25
Ocrelizumab42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 96

The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores (domains) as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36 taps 8 health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, emotional well-being, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. The 8 scales are further summarized to 2 distinct higher-ordered clusters: the PCS and mental composite t-score (MCS). The range for all 8 domains as well as for the composite t- scores is from 0 to 100 with 100 as best possible health status and 0 as worst health status. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
Interventiont-score (Mean)
Unadjusted Baseline mean (n= 319, 355)Adjusted mean change at week 96(n=276, 315)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC44.552-0.833
Ocrelizumab44.3070.326

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score to Week 96

MSFC score consists of: A) Timed 25-Foot walk; B) 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT); and C) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3 version). The MSFCS is based on the concept that scores for these three dimensions (arm, leg, and cognitive function) are combined to create a single score (the MSFC) that can be used to detect change over time in a group of participants with MS. Since the three primary measures differ in what they actually measure, a common composite score for the three different measures i.e., Z- score was selected for the purpose. MSFC Score = {Z arm, average + Z leg, average + Z cognitive} / 3.0. The results from each of these three tests are transformed into Z-scores and averaged to yield a composite score for each participant at each time point. A score of +1 indicates that, on average, an individual scored 1 standard deviation (SD) better than the reference population and a score of -1 indicates that an individual scored 1 SD worse than the reference population. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Unadjusted Baseline mean (n= 342, 358)Adjusted Week 96 mean (n= 269, 308)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC-0.0010.169
Ocrelizumab0.0260.276

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 24 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period

Disability progression was defined as an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of: A) >=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.5 B) >=0.5 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >5.5 The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. Disability progression was considered confirmed when the increase in the EDSS was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. Participants who had initial disability progression with no confirmatory EDSS assessment and who were on treatment at time of clinical cut-off date were censored at the date of their last EDSS assessment. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Week 104

Interventionweeks (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SCNA
OcrelizumabNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Have No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) up to Week 96

NEDA was defined only for participants with a baseline EDSS score >=2.0. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Participants who completed the 96- week treatment period were considered as having evidence of disease activity if at least one protocol- defined relapse (PDR), a confirmed disability progression (CDP) event or at least one MRI scan showing MRI activity (defined as Gd-enhancing T1 lesions, or new or enlarging T2 lesions) was reported during the 96-week treatment period, otherwise the participant was considered as having NEDA. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC24.1
Ocrelizumab43.9

[back to top]

Exposure to Ocrelizumab (Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve, AUC)

AUC represents total drug exposure for one dosing interval after the 4th dose. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Weeks 1, 24, 48, 72; and 30 minutes post-infusion at Week 72; at any time during Weeks 84 and 96

Interventionmicrograms per milliter*day (Mean)
Ocrelizumab3513

[back to top]

Number of New, and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double Blind Treatment

The total number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC2103
Ocrelizumab380

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs included infusion related reactions (IRRs) and serious MS relapses, but excluded non-serious MS relapses. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) included serious MS relapses and serious IRRs. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC357
Ocrelizumab360

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at 96 Weeks

ARR was protocol-defined and calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionrelapses/participant year of treatment (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC0.290
Ocrelizumab0.155

[back to top]

Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) During the Double-Blind Treatment

The total number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC465
Ocrelizumab21

[back to top]

Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Double-Blind Treatment

The total number of new T1-Hypo-Intense Lesions (Chronic Black Holes) for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of new lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 96

Interventionlesions (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC1484
Ocrelizumab567

[back to top]

Percent Change in Brain Volume as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 24 to Week 96

"Brain volume was recorded as an absolute normalized value at the baseline visit then recorded at subsequent visits as a percentage change relative to the absolute value at the baseline visit. Therefore, brain volume at Week 24 was calculated as the brain volume at the baseline visit multiplied by 1 + ([percentage change in brain volume from baseline visit to Week 24]/100). Estimates are from analysis based on mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM) using unstructured covariance matrix: Percentage Change = Brain Volume at Week 24 + Geographical Region (US vs. ROW) + Baseline EDSS (< 4.0 vs. >= 4.0) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week) + Brain Volume at Week 24*Week. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis)." (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: From week 24 up to week 96

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC-0.75
Ocrelizumab-0.638

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) for at Least 12 Weeks

Disability improvement was assessed only for the subgroup of participants with a baseline EDSS score of >= 2.0. It was defined as a reduction in EDSS score of: A) >=1.0 from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >=2 and <=5.5 B) >= 0.5 when the baseline EDSS score > 5.5. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SC18.83
Ocrelizumab21.38

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) for at Least 12 Weeks During the Double-Blind Treatment Period

Disability progression was defined as an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of: A) >=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.5 B) >=0.5 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >5.5 The EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). This outcome measure was considered confirmatory only when results of both studies WA21092 and WA21093 were combined. Disability progression was considered confirmed when the increase in the EDSS was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. Participants who had initial disability progression with no confirmatory EDSS assessment and who were on treatment at time of clinical cut-off date were censored at the date of their last EDSS assessment. (NCT01412333)
Timeframe: Week 104

Interventionweeks (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a 44 mcg SCNA
OcrelizumabNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Other Than Genotype 1 With Sustained Virologic Response at Post Treatment Week 12 (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up Week 12. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Follow-up period)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir85.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin (Genotype 4)90.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)40.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)100.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)90.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)76.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)84.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

cEVR was defined as the percentage of participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at week 12. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir87.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin95.8
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)90.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)100.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)90.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)92.3
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)76.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV83.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With End of the Treatment Response (EOTR)

EOTR was defined as the percentage of participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at end of treatment. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: End of the study (Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir85.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin97.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)90.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)100.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)90.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)92.3
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)84.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV83.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

eRVR was defined as the percentage of participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at both weeks 4 and 12. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 4 and 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir67.7
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin87.5
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)70.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)83.3
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)81.8
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)76.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)64.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV83.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Post Treatment Week 4

RVR was defined as the percentage of participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at Week 4. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir72.7
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin91.7
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)70.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)83.3
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)90.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)76.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)76.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV83.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Post Treatment Week 24 (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as the percentage of participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up week 24. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 24 (Follow-up)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir84.8
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin95.8
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)40.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)100.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)90.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)76.9
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)84.0
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)88.9
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 12 (SVR12) for All Nonresponders With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

SVR12 defined as HCV RNANCT01428063)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Follow-up period)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir + PegIFNα-2a + Ribavirin (NR)94.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Who Died During the Study

AE was defined as any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE was defined as a medical event that at any dose resulted in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; was life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or required or prolonged hospitalization. (NCT01428063)
Timeframe: For AEs: Day 1 until last visit. For SAEs: Day 1 until 30 days post discontinuation of dosing or participation

,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SAEsAEs leading to discontinuation of therapyDeath
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir420
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (pegIFNα /RBV Relapsers)000
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior ASV Failures)010
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior BOC Failures)200
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior DCV Failures)000
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Prior TVR Failures)000
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV (Treatment Naive)120
DCV + ASV + pegIFN-2a+ Ribavirin020
DCV + pegIFN-2a+ RBV000

[back to top]

Median Serum Alanine Aminotransferase at Baseline, Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose), Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 for determination of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose), Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42

,
InterventionU/L (Median)
BaselineDay 7Day 14Day 21Day 28Follow-up (Day 42)
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA56.041.528.027.028.029.0
Placebo + PEG + RIBA43.537.048.539.048.027.0

[back to top]

Median Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of GSK2336805 and Lag Time Before First Observation of Quantifiable Concentration (Tlag) at Day 1

The individual plasma concentration and actual time data was used to derive the PK parameters of GSK2336805 on Day 1 by noncompartmental PK analyses. For the calculation of PK parameters all plasma concentrations that were BLQ before the first measurable concentration were set to zero. The BLQ values that occur at the end of the profile after the last quantifiable concentration were set to missing. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used in all computations of PK parameters (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: 0.0 (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h post-dose (morning of Day 2)

Interventionh (Median)
TmaxTlag
GSK2336805 60 mg (Part A)2.000.00

[back to top]

Number of Participant Achieving Rapid Virological Response (RVR) at Day 28, Nominal Analysis

RVR was defined as the proportion of participants below the assay lower limit of detection (LOD) <18 International units per milliliter (IU/mL) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) after 4 weeks of treatment (Day 28). Participants achieving RVR at Day 28 were considered treatment responders. Participants with missing HCV RNA values at Day 28 or discontinued before Day 28 were considered as treatment failure . Proportion of participants with HCV genotype 1 achieving RVR was the primary comparison of interest to show superiority of GSK2336805 over placebo in genotype 1 participants. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HCV RNA >= Low Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)Undetectable HCV RNA
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA38
Placebo + PEG + RIBA31

[back to top]

Number of Participant Achieving RVR at Day 28, (Primary and Supportive Analyses)

RVR was defined as the proportion of participants LOD <18 IU/mL for HCV RNA after 4 weeks of treatment (Day 28). Participants achieving RVR at Day 28 were considered treatment responders. Participants with missing HCV RNA values at Day 28 or discontinued before Day 28 were considered as treatment failure. Proportion of participants with HCV genotype 1 achieving RVR was the primary comparison of interest to show superiority of GSK2336805 over placebo in genotype 1 participants. The primary and supportive analysis differs from the nominal analysis as supportive analysis is assessed at Day 28 ± 2 (2 days visit window) whereas, the nominal analysis was assessed at Day 28. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Undetectable HCV RNAHCV RNA >= LLOQ
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA74
Placebo + PEG + RIBA13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Treatment Period

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE include AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEAny SAE
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA110
Placebo + PEG + RIBA40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 With Virologic Response

Serum for determination of HCV genotype was collected at the screening visit. Genotype was determined by the VERSANT HCV genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA). Number of participants with HCV genotype 1 were reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 7, 14 and 21

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 7, Undetectable HCV RNADay 7, Detectable HCV RNA but < LLOQDay 7, HCV RNA >= LLOQDay 14, Undetectable HCV RNADay 14, Detectable HCV RNA but < LLOQDay 14, HCV RNA >= LLOQDay 21, Undetectable HCV RNADay 21, Detectable HCV RNA but < LLOQDay 21, HCV RNA >= LLOQ
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA119425713
Placebo + PEG + RIBA004004004

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Toxicity Grade for Serum Chemistry Parameters for Day 1 to Day 28

Abnormalities were graded according to the modified DAIDS version 1.0. Shift from Baseline to worst post Baseline toxicity grade were presented for Day 1 to Day 28. The toxicity Grades were, Grade 1: mild (no or minimal interference with usual social & functional activities); Grade 2: moderate (greater than minimal interference with usual social and functional activities); Grade 3: severe (inability to perform usual social and functional activities); Grade 4: potentially life threatening (inability to perform basic self-care functions or Medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death). Clinical chemistry parameters were alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatine phosphokinase, total CO2, chloride, creatinine, glucose, sodium, phosphate, potassium, total albumin, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin. Only participants with change in toxicity grades are reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine aminotransferase, No toxicityAlanine aminotransferase, Grade 1Albumin, No toxicityAlbumin, Grade 1Aspartate aminotransferase, No toxicityAspartate aminotransferase, Grade 1Aspartate aminotransferase, Grade 2Total Bilirubin, No toxicityTotal Bilirubin, Grade 1Total Bilirubin, Grade 2Carbon dioxide, No toxicityCarbon dioxide, Grade 1Creatine phosphokinase, No toxicityCreatine phosphokinase, Grade 1Glucose, No toxicityGlucose, Grade 1Glucose, Grade 2Phosphorus, inorganic, No toxicityPhosphorus, inorganic, Grade 1Phosphorus, inorganic, Grade 2Potassium, No toxicityPotassium, Grade 1Sodium, No toxicitySodium, Grade 2
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA1101108109208110154182110192
Placebo + PEG + RIBA213111130111404004003040

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Toxicity Grade Hematology Parameters for Day 1 to Day 28

Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the modified division of AIDS ( DAIDS)version 1.0. Shift from Baseline to worst post baseline toxicity grade (where applicable) were presented for Day 1 to Day 28. The toxicity Grades were, Grade 1: mild (no or minimal interference with usual social & functional activities); Grade 2: moderate (greater than minimal interference with usual social and functional activities); Grade 3: severe (inability to perform usual social and functional activities); Grade 4: potentially life threatening (inability to perform basic self-care functions or Medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death). Hematology parameters were red blood cell, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet white blood cell count with differential leukocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hemoglobin, No toxicityHemoglobin, Grade 1Hemoglobin, Grade 2International normalized ratio, No toxicityInternational normalized ratio, Grade 1Lymphocytes absolute, No toxicityLymphocytes absolute, Grade 4Platelet count, No toxicityPlatelet count, Grade 1Platelet count, Grade 2Prothrombin time, No toxicityProthrombin time, Grade 1Total neutrophils, absolute, No toxicityTotal neutrophils, absolute, Grade 1Total neutrophils, absolute, Grade 2Total neutrophils, absolute, Grade 3White cell count, No toxicityWhite cell count, Grade 1White cell count, Grade 2
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA73110110110101017121821
Placebo + PEG + RIBA3103140301312200310

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts in Urinalysis Parameters From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal

The urinalysis parameters analyzed were Leukocyte esterase, bilirubin, occult blood, glucose, ketones, nitrite, pH, specific gravity and dipstick assessments. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important urinalysis findings at specified visit were reported. Visits where no abnormal values were observed not reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 14, 28, Follow-up (Day 42)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Day 14Occult blood, Follow-upKetone, Day 14Nitrate, Day 14Leukocytes, Day 14
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA00111
Placebo + PEG + RIBA11211

[back to top]

Mean Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of GSK2336805

The individual plasma concentration and actual time data was used to derive the PK parameters of GSK2336805 on Day 1 by noncompartmental PK analyses. For the calculation of PK parameters all plasma concentrations that were BLQ before the first measurable concentration were set to zero. The BLQ values that occur at the end of the profile after the last quantifiable concentration were set to missing. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used in all computations of PK parameters (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: 0.0 (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h post-dose (morning of Day 1)

InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
GSK2336805 60 mg18.27

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern

The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA0
Placebo + PEG + RIBA0

[back to top]

Probability of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 Achieving RVR At Day 28, Nominal Analysis

The primary comparison of interest was performed using a Bayesian probability model. Probability of achieving undetectable HCV RNA distribution analyzed by nominal analysis was reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionPosterior probability (Mean)
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA0.67
Placebo + PEG + RIBA0.21

[back to top]

Probability of Participants With HCV Genotype 1 Achieving RVR at Day 28, Primary and Supportive Analyses

The primary comparison of interest was performed using a Bayesian probability model. Probability of achieving undetectable HCV RNA distribution analyzed was reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionPosterior probability (Mean)
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA0.62
Placebo + PEG + RIBA0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HCV Viral Load During 24 Hour (h) Following a Single Dose of GSK2336805 on the Log 10 Scale

Blood samples for determination of HCV RNA levels were collected at immediately prior to and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and 24 h after the first dose in Part 1 (Day 1). Measurement of HCV viral load was analyzed by the central laboratory using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment on or before the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was computed as value at post Baseline specified time point minus Baseline value. Virus RNA levels reported as <43 are undetectable levels. If the result for HCV RNA (IU/ML) was <43, then change from Baseline was calculated using 42, and the change from Baseline on the log scale was calculated using log (42). (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline [Pre-dose], 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and 24 h)

,
InterventionLog IU/mL (Mean)
1 h post-dose2 h post-dose4 h post-dose6 h post-dose8 h post-dose24 h post-dose
GSK2336805 60 mg (Part A)0.02-0.03-0.70-1.37-1.83-2.38
Placebo (Part A)-0.01-0.00-0.070.080.07-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QTcF Interval at Day 2 and 28

Single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained. The standard ECG criteria of potential clinical importance were 1) absolute QTc Interval, > 450 milliseconds (msec), 2) absolute PR Interval, <110 msec, 3) absolute QRS Interval, < 75 msec and 4) increase from baseline in QTc > 60 msec. QTc Interval was calculated using Frederica correction formula: QTcF = QT / (RR)^1/3. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline assessment value from post Baseline visit value. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment on or before the first dose of study drug. The change from Baseline in QTc Interval at Day 2 and 28 were reported. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose ), Day 2 and Day 28

,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
DAY 2DAY 28
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA0.01-5.15
Placebo + PEG + RIBA0.829.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose), Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 for determination of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment on or before the first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was computed as value at post Baseline specified time point minus Baseline value. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose), Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42

,
InterventionUnits per litre (U/L) (Mean)
Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 28Follow-up (Day 42)
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA-15.3-25.7-25.9-24.4-19.5
Placebo + PEG + RIBA-15.0-0.5-10.07.0-19.5

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC[0-24]), AUC From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK2336805, at Day 1

AUC values were determined using the linear-up, log-down trapezoidal rule. The individual plasma concentration and actual time data was used to derive the PK parameters of GSK2336805 on Day 1 by noncompartmental PK analyses. For the calculation of PK parameters all plasma concentrations that were below quantification limit (BLQ) before the first measurable concentration were set to zero. The BLQ values that occur at the end of the profile after the last quantifiable concentration were set to missing. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used in all computations of PK parameters. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: 0.0 (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h post-dose (morning of Day 2)

InterventionNanogram (ng)*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC (0-24)AUC(0-inf)
GSK2336805 60 mg (Part A)2977.793284.90

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HCV RNA Levels at Day 2 and Day 28

Blood samples for determination of HCV RNA levels were collected from screening, immediately prior to and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the first dose in Part 1 (Day 1), during Part 2 on Days 2 (24 h after the Day 1 dose), 7, 14, 21, and 28, and at the post-treatment follow-up visit on Day 42. All viral load samples, with the exception of the one taken during the screening visit, were taken in duplicate. The actual time and date of each sample collection will be recorded. Measurement of HCV viral load was analyzed by the central laboratory using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre -dose ) and Day 2 (24 h, post-dose), Day 28

,
InterventionLog IU/mL (Mean)
Day 2, 24 h post-doseDay 28, Pre or Post AM dose
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA-2.38-4.78
Placebo + PEG + RIBA-0.11-1.99

[back to top]

Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration of GSK2336805 (Cmax) and Concentration at 24 h (C24) at Day 1

The individual plasma concentration and actual time data was used to derive the PK parameters of GSK2336805 on Day 1 by non-compartmental PK analyses. For the calculation of PK parameters all plasma concentrations that were BLQ before the first measurable concentration were set to zero. The BLQ values that occur at the end of the profile after the last quantifiable concentration were set to missing. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used in all computations of PK parameters. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: 0.0 (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h post-dose (morning of Day 1)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
CmaxC24
GSK2336805 60 mg (Part A)404.8426.98

[back to top]

Mean Pre-dose Concentration and Concentration at 2 to 4 h Post-dose of GSK2336805 at Days 7, 14, 21, and 28

The individual plasma concentration and actual time data was used to derive the PK parameters of GSK2336805 on Day 1 by noncompartmental PK analyses. For the calculation of PK parameters all plasma concentrations that were BLQ before the first measurable concentration were set to zero. The BLQ values that occur at the end of the profile after the last quantifiable concentration were set to missing. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used in all computations of PK parameters. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0 to 2 h, > 2 h up to 4 h, > 4 h up to 6 h, or > 6 h up to 10 h on Days 7, 14, 21 and 28

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Day 7, PredoseDay 7, >2 to 4 hDay 7, >4 to 6 hDay 14, PredoseDay 14, >0 to 2 hDay 14, >2 to 4 hDay 14, >4 to 6 hDay 21, PredoseDay 21, >2 to 4 hDay 21, >4 to 6 hDay 21, >6 to 10 hDay 28, PredoseDay 28, >0 to 2 hDay 28, >2 to 4 h
GSK2336805 60 mg (Part A)37.80621.40314.19121.57518.82364.75304.03484.18346.00546.72317.4916.95607.02402.05

[back to top]

Mean Serum HCV RNA Levels at Baseline (Day 1), Day 2 and Day 28

Blood samples for determination of HCV RNA levels were collected from screening, immediately prior to and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the first dose in Part 1 (Day 1), during Part 2 on Days 2 (24 h after the Day 1 dose), 7, 14, 21, and 28, and at the post-treatment follow-up visit on Day 42. All viral load samples, with the exception of the one taken during the screening visit, were taken in duplicate. The actual time and date of each sample collection will be recorded. Measurement of HCV viral load was analyzed by the central laboratory using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. (NCT01439373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose), Day 2 (24 h, Post-dose) and Day 28

,
InterventionLog IU/mL (Mean)
Day 1, Pre-dose,Day 2, 24 h post-doseDay 28, Pre or Post ante meridian (AM) dose
GSK2336805 60 mg + PEG + RIBA6.614.231.80
Placebo + PEG + RIBA5.435.333.44

[back to top]

Participants With Change in Cough

changes in cough status after treatment for 1 month. (NCT01442779)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Alpha5

[back to top]

Minimal/no Progression (1 yr) by High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) & Pulmonary Function

Disease progression was determined by comparing results of the High Resolution Computed Tomography(HRCT) and pulmonary function at one year to the baseline HRCT & pulmonary function. The same radiologist did the comparsion for all subjects. (NCT01442779)
Timeframe: 1 yr

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Alpha12

[back to top]

Minimal/no Change in Quality of Life

(NCT01442779)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Interferon Alpha12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) or Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) by rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in the IL28B Gene

Participants categorized into three genotypes based on SNPs in the IL28B gene were assessed for SVR12 and SVR24, defined as response in which hepatitis C virus RNA levels below lower limit of quantitation or below target detected or target not detected at follow-up Week 12 and Week 24 respectively. (NCT01448044)
Timeframe: Post Treatment Weeks 12, 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IL28B Genotype CC (SVR12) (n=22, 9)IL28B Genotype CT (SVR12) (n=40, 27)IL28B Genotype TT (SVR12) (n=20, 6)IL28B Genotype CC (SVR24) (n=22, 9)IL28B Genotype CT (SVR24) (n=40, 27)IL28B Genotype TT (SVR24) (n=20, 6)
Daclatasvir + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin95.575.080.095.572.580.0
Placebo + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin100.033.30.088.933.30.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels

Participants who achieved HCV RNA undetectable ie, 10 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). Participants in the placebo arm did not have visits beyond post treatment Week 24. (NCT01448044)
Timeframe: Treatment Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12; Weeks 4 and 12, End of treatment (EOT), Post treatment Week 24, Post treatment Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Weeks 4 and 12 (VR 4 & 12)EOTPost treatment Week 24Post treatment Week 48
Daclatasvir + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin14.645.185.480.587.884.179.390.278.081.8
Placebo + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin0.09.511.916.738.147.611.964.340.5NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)

Participants who achieved HCV RNA levels below LLOQ ie, 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL). Participants in the placebo arm did not have visits beyond post treatment Week 24. (NCT01448044)
Timeframe: Treatment Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12; Weeks 4 and 12; End of treatment (EOT); Post treatment Week 24; Post treatment Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Weeks 4 and 12End of TreatmentPost treatment Week 24Post treatment Week 48
Daclatasvir + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin53.789.091.584.187.885.484.192.780.583.6
Placebo + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin4.811.919.040.547.659.519.064.340.5NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) and Who Died

AE was defined as any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a pre-existing condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE was defined as a medical event that at any dose resulted in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or required or prolonged hospitalisation. (NCT01448044)
Timeframe: From Day 1 (start of study treatment) up to Follow-up Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEs leading to discontinuation of study drugSAEsDeath
Daclatasvir + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin480
Placebo + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin320

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With 12 Week Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)

Participants were assessed for sustained virologic response 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12) defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels < lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ was 25 IU/mL), target detected (TD) or target not detected (TND) at post-treatment Week 12. (NCT01448044)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Follow-up period)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daclatasvir + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin81.7
Placebo + PegIFNα2a + Ribavirin42.9

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)

"The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. eRVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at both 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the start of study treatment. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)105
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)51

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 4 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR4)

"SVR4 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at 4 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 28)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)89.6
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)98.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Viral Relapse

"Viral relapse was defined as having detectable HCV RNA during antiviral follow-up in subjects who had HCV RNA less than (<) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at end of treatment. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The LLOQ was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: After last dose of study drug up to 4 weeks (up to Week 28), 12 weeks (up to Week 36), 24 weeks (up to Week 48) antiviral follow-up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
4 Weeks12 Weeks24 Weeks
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)1.97.510.4
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)0.00.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response at Week 72 (SVR72)

"SVR72 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at Week 72. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)72.4
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)86.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)

"SVR12 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at 12 weeks after last planned dose of study drug. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 36)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)88.7
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)96.2

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"AE: any adverse change from the subject's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents administered during the course of the study." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)1045
Telaprevir 12 Wk +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Wk (Non Randomized)6113
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Non Randomized)193
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)514

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)

"The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 4 weeks after the start of study treatment. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)106
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)52

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With On-Treatment Virologic Failure

On-treatment virologic failure was defined as subjects who met futility (as per investigator discretion) or who completed the assigned treatment duration and had detectable HCV RNA at planned end of treatment (up to 48 weeks). This outcome was planned to be assessed in all reporting groups and results were to be reported for total arm as well. (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)0
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)0
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Non Randomized)0
Telaprevir 12 Wk +Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 48 Wk (Non Randomized)3.3
Telaprevir+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a, RBV (Total)0.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)

"SVR24 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels at 24 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. This outcome was planned to be assessed only in Telaprevir 12 Week (Wk)+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized) and Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized) reporting groups." (NCT01459913)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Telaprevir 12 Week+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 12 Wk (Randomized)85.8
Telaprevir 12 Wk+Peg-IFN-alfa-2a,RBV 24 Wk (Randomized)92.3

[back to top]

Level of Activated STAT1(Phospho-STAT1)

Mean and 95% confidence interval will be summarized for phospho-STAT1 at a lower dose and the standard dose. The phospho-STAT1 will also be compared between the dose levels. (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: up to 4 weeks

InterventionMU/m2 (Mean)
Dose I (10 MU/m2)Dose II (4 MU/m2)
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)5.964.80

[back to top]

Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression at Dose Level 4MU

Evaluated using microarray analysis of patient PBMCs. Compared between doses using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: 4 hours post therapy

Interventionfold increase (Median)
SOCS1-4 hour post 4MU-OAS1-4 hour post 4MUCXCL10-4 hour post 4MUCD69-4 hour post 4MU
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)1.63.9112.91.5

[back to top]

Effect of Dose-reduction on Expression of Interferon Alfa Stimulated Genes

Evaluated using microarray analysis of patient PBMCs. Compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for the dose 10MU/m2 (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: 1 hour post therapy

Interventionfold change (Median)
SOCS1-1 hour post 10MU-OAS1-1 hour post 10MU-CXCL10-1 hour post 10MUCD69-1 hour post 10MU
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)1.51.628.71.3

[back to top]

Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression

Evaluated using microarray analysis of patient PBMCs. Compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for the dose 4MU/m2 (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: 1 hour post therapy

Interventionfold increase (Median)
SOCS1-1 hour post 4MUOAS1-1 hour post 4MUCXCL10-1 hour post 4MUCD69-1 hour post 4MU
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)1.21.66.01.3

[back to top]

Effect of Dose-reduction on Interferon Alfa Gene Expression Through Marker CD69

Evaluated using microarray analysis of patient PBMCs. Compared between doses using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: 4 hours post therapy

Interventionfold increase (Median)
SOCS1- 4 hour post-10MUOAS1-4 hour post -10MUCXCL10-4 hour post- 10MUCD69-4 hour post- 10MU
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)1.51.628.71.3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

Determine the tolerability of adjuvant IFN-α-2b administered at an optimized dose in terms of the toxicities that are observed and the ability of patients to receive a full year of therapy. (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)15

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Correlation Between STAT1 Phosphorylation and Interferon Alfa Gene Regulation

Levels of p-STAT1 in PBMCs were analyzed just prior to IFN-a-2b administration to determine levels that remained stable or increased over the course of dose reduction. (NCT01460875)
Timeframe: Prior to treatment and 1 and 4 hours post therapy on day 1 every other week during the first 12 weeks, and then every 3 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Interferon Therapy)71

[back to top]

Document Any Objective Anti-tumor Responses and Time to Tumor Progression That May Occur in Response to This Treatment Regimen.

"Measure levels of the cell cycle proteins p21 and p27 in PBMCs and tumor biopsies obtained pre-study and during week 4 of Cycle 1 (Day 26).~Conduct histologic evaluations of microvessel density, tumor apoptosis and lymphocytic infiltrates within tumor biopsies obtained pre- and post-study.~Measure plasma levels of bFGF and VEGF over the course of the study.~Monitor the effects of proteasome inhibition on the biological activity of IFN-α within immune cells by measuring Jak-STAT signal transduction in patient PBMCs." (NCT01462773)
Timeframe: up to 25 weeks

Interventionpatients (Number)
partial responsestable disease
Bortezomib & Interferon-a17

[back to top]

Determine Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of VELCADE When Administered in Combination With IFN-α-2b to Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma.

A standard method for the design of this study. Initially, three patients will be treated at a starting dose of VELCADE (1.0 mg/m2). If one of the three patients demonstrates a DLT, then an additional 3 patients will be treated at that dose level. If only one of the six show DLT, then the next cohort of three patients will be entered at the next dose level (1.3 mg/m2). If two or more of the six demonstrate DLT, no further patients will be treated at that dose level. The highest dose level at which less than 2 patients experienced DLT will be expanded to six patients. (NCT01462773)
Timeframe: up to 25 weeks or until disease progression

Interventiontoxicities (Number)
Grade 4 fatigueGrade 4 Lymphopenia
Bortezomib & Interferon-a31

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. Percentage of participants with undetectable HCV RNA (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: EOT (up to Week 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)55.6
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)63.8
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)61.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR 24)

SVR 24 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 72)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Naïve (n= 23, 38, 29)Prior Relapser (n=8, 11, 4)Prior Null Responder (n= 15, 9, 14)Prior Partial Responder (n= 7, 8, 9)Total (n= 53, 66, 56)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)65.275.033.314.350.9
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)57.954.522.275.054.5
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)51.710035.755.651.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)

SVR 12 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 60)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Naïve (n= 24, 39, 31)Prior Relapser (n=8, 11, 4)Prior Null Responder (n= 15, 11, 15)Prior Partial Responder (n= 7, 8, 9)Total (n= 54, 69, 59)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)66.775.04014.353.7
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)59.054.536.487.558.0
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)61.31004055.657.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: Week 4

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Naïve (n= 24, 39, 31)Prior Relapser (n=8, 11, 4)Prior Null Responder (n= 15, 11, 15)Prior Partial Responder (n= 7, 8, 9)Total (n= 54, 69, 59)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)50.062.526.742.944.4
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)53.872.754.550.056.5
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)74.210053.344.466.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. eRVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Naïve (n= 24, 39, 31)Prior Relapser (n=8, 11, 4)Prior Null Responder (n= 15, 11, 15)Prior Partial Responder (n= 7, 8, 9)Total (n= 54, 69, 59)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)50.062.526.714.340.7
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)53.872.754.550.056.5
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)61.310053.344.459.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant during the study; the event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. This includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency after the informed consent form is signed. SAE (subset of AE): medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)10013.0
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)95.711.6
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)94.915.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Telaprevir Resistant HCV Variant at Non-Structural Viral Protein 3-4A (NS3-4A) Region

Sequence analysis of the HCV NS3-4A region was performed to monitor telaprevir-resistant variants. HCV RNA was isolated from the plasma, amplified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and sequenced (sequencing assay limit of detection HCV RNA >=1000 IU/mL). Results of this outcome measure were to be reported for overall participants instead of by HAART treatment. (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: Baseline, follow-up (Week 96)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (n = 180)Follow-up (n = 26)
T/PR + HAART Regimen211

[back to top]

Maximum (Cmax), Minimum (Cmin), and Average Plasma Concentration (Cavg)

Cmax, Cmin, and Cavg were reported for atazanavir (ATV), efavirenz (EFV), raltegravir (RAL), and telaprevir. (NCT01467479)
Timeframe: Day -14 to Day -1 and Week 1 for ATV, EFV, and RAL; Week 1 for telaprevir

,,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
ATV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmax(n=46, 0, 0)ATV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmin(n=46, 0, 0)ATV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cavg(n=41, 0, 0)ATV: Week 1, Cmax (n=42, 0, 0)ATV: Week 1, Cmin (n=42, 0, 0)ATV: Week 1, Cavg (n=30, 0, 0)EFV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmax(n=0, 60, 0)EFV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmin(n=0, 60, 0)EFV: Day -14 to Day -1, Cavg(n=0, 51, 0)EFV: Week 1, Cmax (n=0, 51, 0)EFV: Week 1, Cmin (n=0, 51, 0)EFV: Week 1, Cavg (n=0, 47, 0)RAL: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmax(n=0, 0, 52)RAL: Day -14 to Day -1, Cmin(n=0, 0, 52)RAL: Day -14 to Day -1, Cavg(n=0, 0, 35)RAL: Week 1, Cmax (n=0, 0, 49)RAL: Week 1, Cmin (n=0, 0, 49)RAL: Week 1, Cavg (n=0, 0, 34)Telaprevir: Week 1, Cmax(n=49, 59, 54)Telaprevir: Week 1, Cmin(n=49, 59, 54)Telaprevir: Week 1, Cavg(n=30, 32, 26)
T/PR + HAART Regimen (ATV/r-Based)28709911100282012801320NANANANANANANANANANANANA316016502320
T/PR + HAART Regimen (EFV-Based)NANANANANANA380025602150334022901920NANANANANANA378017502430
T/PR + HAART Regimen (RAL-Based)NANANANANANANANANANANANA19001964832320281643347018402520

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant during the study; the event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. This includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency after the informed consent form is signed. AE includes SAE as well as Non-SAEs. SAE (subset of AE): medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AESAE
Group A - Black96.38.5
Group B - Non-Black100.015.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. eRVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response (n = 41, 10)Prior Partial Response (n= 20, 6)Prior Relapse ( n= 21, 22)Total (n= 82, 38)
Group A - Black24.445.066.740.2
Group B - Non-Black30.066.768.257.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With On Treatment Virologic Failure

On treatment virologic failure was defined as meeting any futility rule or completing assigned treatment duration and having detectable HCV RNA at EOT. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. Futility rules: 1) Virologic breakthrough (at least 1 log10 increase from nadir or confirmed detectable HCV RNA after undetectable HCV RNA) from Day 1 through Week 24 or 48 (depending on treatment duration); 2) HCV RNA >1000 IU/mL during Weeks 4 to 12, inclusive; 3) Detectable HCV RNA after Week 12. Percentages are calculated by using total number in FA set as denominator, in each category. (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 36, 40, and 48

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response, Week 2Prior Null Response, Week 4Prior Null Response, Week 8Prior Null Response, Week 12Prior Null Response, Week 16Prior Null Response, Week 24Prior Null Response, Week 28Prior Null Response, Week 36Prior Null Response, Week 40Prior Null Response, Week 48Prior Partial Response, Week 2Prior Partial Response, Week 4Prior Partial Response, Week 8Prior Partial Response, Week 12Prior Partial Response, Week 16Prior Partial Response, Week 24Prior Partial Response, Week 28Prior Partial Response, Week 36Prior Partial Response, Week 40Prior Partial Response, Week 48Prior Relapse, Week 2Prior Relapse, Week 4Prior Relapse, Week 8Prior Relapse, Week 12Prior Relapse, Week 16Prior Relapse, Week 24Prior Relapse, Week 28Prior Relapse, Week 36Prior Relapse, Week 40Prior Relapse, Week 48Total, Week 2Total, Week 4Total, Week 8Total, Week 12Total, Week 16Total, Week 24Total, Week 28Total, Week 36Total, Week 40Total, Week 48
Group A - Black04.98.512.219.523.223.225.628.029.302.42.44.94.96.16.17.37.37.30001.21.21.21.21.21.21.207.311.018.325.630.530.534.136.637.8
Group B - Non-Black02.67.97.97.910.513.213.213.213.200002.67.910.510.510.510.5000002.62.62.65.35.302.67.97.910.521.126.326.328.928.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. Relapse was defined as having undetectable HCV RNA (=lower limit of quantification) during follow-up. (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: 4 weeks (Wk) (up to Week 52), 12 weeks (up to Week 60) and 24 weeks (up to Week 72) after actual EOT

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response, 4 Wk After EOT (n=17,3)Prior Null Response, 12 Wk After EOT (n=17,3)Prior Null Response, 24 Wk After EOT (n=17,3)Prior Partial Response, 4Wk After EOT (n=13,4)Prior Partial Response, 12 Wk After EOT (n=13,4)Prior Partial Response, 24 Wk After EOT (n=13,4)Prior Relapse, 4 Wk After EOT (n=18,19)Prior Relapse, 12 Wk After EOT (n=18,19)Prior Relapse, 24 Wk After EOT (n=18,19)Total, 4 Wk After EOT (n=48,26)Total, 12 Wk After EOT (n=48,26)Total, 24 Wk After EOT (n=48,26)
Group A - Black23.523.529.415.423.123.111.111.111.116.718.820.8
Group B - Non-Black33.333.333.350.050.050.015.826.326.323.130.830.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last actual dose of study drug (up to Week 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response (n = 41, 10)Prior Partial Response (n= 20, 6)Prior Relapse ( n= 21, 22)Total (n= 82, 38)
Group A - Black26.840.066.740.2
Group B - Non-Black20.033.359.144.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Actual Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA Levels (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last actual dose of study drug (up to Week 72)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response (n = 41, 10)Prior Partial Response (n= 20, 6)Prior Relapse ( n= 21, 22)Total (n= 82, 38)
Group A - Black19.530.061.932.9
Group B - Non-Black20.016.750.036.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. Virologic breakthrough on treatment was defined as an increase of at least 1 log10 from nadir or confirmed detectable HCV RNA (>=lower limit of quantification) after undetectable HCV RNA (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prior Null Response, Week 2Prior Null Response, Week 4Prior Null Response, Week 8Prior Null Response, Week 12Prior Partial Response, Week 2Prior Partial Response, Week 4Prior Partial Response, Week 8Prior Partial Response, Week 12Prior Relapse, Week 2Prior Relapse, Week 4Prior Relapse, Week 8Prior Relapse, Week 12Total, Week 2Total, Week 4Total, Week 8Total, Week 12
Group A - Black01.23.76.102.42.42.40001.203.73.79.8
Group B - Non-Black02.65.35.30000000002.65.35.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Telaprevir Resistant HCV Variant at Non-Structural Viral Protein 3-4A (NS3-4A) Region

Sequence analysis of the HCV NS3-4A region was performed to monitor telaprevir-resistant variants. HCV RNA was isolated from the plasma, amplified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and sequenced (sequencing assay limit of detection HCV RNA >=1000 IU/mL). Results of this outcome measure were to be reported for overall participants instead of by race and by prior response. (NCT01467492)
Timeframe: up to Week 72

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Participants47

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Viral Response (eRVR)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. eRVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at both 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the start of study treatment. (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Naive (n= 16, 2)Prior Relapser (n= 10, 2)Prior Null Responder (n=16, 4)Prior Partial Responder (n= 3, 1)Uncategorized (n= 6, 1)Total (n= 51, 10)
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)050.025.0100.0030.0
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)68.850.037.566.733.351.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Viral Response (RVR)

The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection was 10 IU/mL. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 4 weeks after the start of study treatment. (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: Week 4

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Naive (n= 16, 2)Prior Relapser (n= 10, 2)Prior Null Responder (n=16, 4)Prior Partial Responder (n= 3, 1)Uncategorized (n= 6, 1)Total (n= 51, 10)
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)050.025.0100.0030.0
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)68.850.043.866.733.352.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as an undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Naive (n= 16, 2)Prior Relapser (n= 10, 2)Prior Null Responder (n=16, 4)Prior Partial Responder (n= 3, 1)Uncategorized (n= 6, 1)Total (n= 51, 10)
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)50.0100.050.0100.0100.070.0
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)75.060.037.566.750.056.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With On-Treatment Virologic Failure

On-treatment virologic failure was defined as subjects who met futility or who completed the assigned treatment duration and had detectable HCV RNA at planned end of treatment (up to 48 weeks). Data for this outcome was not planned to be reported by prior response. (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)0
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Viral Response 24 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Drug (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA Levels at 24 weeks after last planned dose of study treatment. The plasma HCV RNA level was measured using Roche TaqMan HCV RNA assay. The lower limit of quantification was 25 IU/mL. (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last planned dose of study drug (up to Week 72)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Naive (n= 5,1)Prior Relapser (n= 4,1)Prior Null Responder (n=10, 4)Prior Partial Responder (n= 0, 1)Uncategorized (n= 5, 0)Total (n= 24, 7)
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)0050.0100.0042.9
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)60.025.020.0020.029.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"Any adverse change from the participant's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, including any adverse experience, abnormal recording or clinical laboratory assessment value which occurs during the course of the study, whether it is considered related to the study drug or not. An adverse event includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug. SAE: medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Study drug includes all investigational agents (including placebo, if applicable) administered during the course of the study." (NCT01467505)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Cyclosporine)103
T/PR + Immunosuppressant Regimen (Tacrolimus)5111

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week 48 Compared to Baseline

"Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.~A positive change value indicates improvement of the outcome. A negative change value indicates worsening of the outcome." (NCT01468337)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48

InterventionETDRS letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b4.67

[back to top]

Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week 2 Compared to Baseline

"Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.~A positive change value indicates improvement of the outcome. A negative change value indicates worsening of the outcome." (NCT01468337)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionETDRS letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.80

[back to top]

Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 2 Compared to Baseline

"Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.~A positive change value indicates improvement of the outcome. A negative change value indicates worsening of the outcome." (NCT01468337)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionETDRS letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b0.4

[back to top]

Changes in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 48 Compared to Baseline

"Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.~A positive change value indicates improvement of the outcome. A negative change value indicates worsening of the outcome." (NCT01468337)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48

InterventionETDRS letters (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b2.67

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study

(NCT01468337)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Interferon Gamma-1b0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) by rs12979860 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in the IL28B Gene

Percentages calculated as number of responders/number who received treatment. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

,,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CC Genotype (n=36, 14, 39, 89, 6)CT Genotype (n=72, 22, 50,144, 15)TT Genotype (n=22, 3, 12, 37, 2)Not reported (n=2, 0, 5, 7, 1)
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30, 60 or 90 mg87.667.462.271.4
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 30 mg + 60 mg79.570.058.360.0
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg92.963.633.30.0
Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART):Daclatasvir,30mg94.466.768.2100.0
Non-HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg100.093.350.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels Lower Than The Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ), Target Detected (TD) or Target Not Detected (TND)

Participants who achieved HCV RNA levels lower than the LLOQ i.e., 25 IU/ml, TD or TND. HCV RNA levels were measured by the Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test version 2.0 from the central laboratory. HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and at both Weeks 4 and 12; end of treatment; and follow-up Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Weeks 4 and 12End of treatmentFollow-up Week 12Follow-up Week 24
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30 or 60 or 90 mg39.771.582.784.184.185.278.784.873.370.4
Non-HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg41.791.795.887.595.891.791.795.887.583.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died and With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Events (AEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

Adverse event was defined as any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a pre-existing condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE was defined as a medical event that at any dose resulted in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; was life-threating, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or required prolonged hospitalization. HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 7 days post last dose of study treatment (up to Week 48)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DeathsSAEsGrade 3 to 4 AEsAEs leading to discontinuation
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30 or 60 or 90 mg2249317
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 30 mg + 60 mg06356
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg16124
Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART):Daclatasvir,30mg012467
Non-HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg0041

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) values lower than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up Week 12. HCV RNA levels were measured by the Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test version 2.0 from the central laboratory. HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) values lower than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up Week 12. HCV RNA levels were measured by the Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test version 2.0 from the central laboratory. HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART):Daclatasvir,30mg75
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg71.8
HAART: Daclatasvir, 30 mg + 60 mg71.7
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30 or 60 or 90 mg73.3
Non-HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg87.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Received Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), Maintained HIV RNA <40 Copies/mL, and Experienced Confirmed HIV RNA ≥400 Copies/mL

Participants who received HAART, maintained HIV RNA <40 copies/mL, and experienced confirmed HIV RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL were determined. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: End of treatment (up to Week 48)

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
HIV RNA <40 copies/mLHIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30 or 60 or 90 mg90.60.4
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 30mg + 60 mg93.40.0
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg89.72.6
Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART):Daclatasvir,30mg88.60.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Levels Lower Than the Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ), Target Not Detected (TND)

Participants who achieved HCV RNA levels lower than the LLOQ, TND. HCV RNA levels were measured by the Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test version 2.0 from the central laboratory. HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. (NCT01471574)
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 and at both Weeks 4 and 12; end of treatment; and follow-up Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Weeks 4 and 12End of treatmentFollow-up Week 12Follow-up Week 24
HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir 30 or 60 or 90 mg933.964.374.47881.261.484.873.370.4
Non-HAART Therapy: Daclatasvir, 60 mg16.75091.787.595.891.787.595.887.583.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count in Percentage

(NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 42, 48, 52, 60 and 72

Interventionpercentage of lymphocyte (Mean)
Baseline (n=93)Change at Week 2 (n=89)Change at Week 4 (n=91)Change at Week 8 (n=92)Change at Week 12 (n=91)Change at Week 16 (n=88)Change at Week 20 (n=84)Change at Week 24 (n=89)Change at Week 28 (n=82)Change at Week 36 (n=83)Change at Week 42 (n=33)Change at Week 48 (n=77)Change at Week 52 (n=35)Change at Week 60 (n=40)Change at Week 72 (n=38)Change at End of study (n=93)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4831.650.422.503.853.935.475.275.503.792.756.412.093.260.250.700.13

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count

(NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 42, 48, 52, 60 and 72

Interventioncell counts per microliter (Mean)
Baseline (n=93)Change at Week 2 (n=89)Change at Week 4 (n=91)Change at Week 8 (n=92)Change at Week 12 (n=91)Change at Week 16 (n=88)Change at Week 20 (n=84)Change at Week 24 (n=89)Change at Week 28 (n=82)Change at Week 36 (n=83)Change at Week 42 (n=33)Change at Week 48 (n=77)Change at Week 52 (n=35)Change at Week 60 (n=40)Change at Week 72 (n=38)Change at End of Study (n=93)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/48640.3-95.0-171.5-244.2-271.7-275.5-283.5-288.8-252.3-198.7-336.8-166.6-202.7-90.6-62.9-51.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse

Participants were considered to have a viral relapse when, at actual end of treatment, HCV RNA levels were less than 25 IU per mL undetectable; and during the follow-up period, HCV RNA levels were more than or equal to 25 IU per mL. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Week 1 to 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4810.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load

(NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 42, 48, 52, 60 and 72

Interventioncopies per milliliter (Mean)
Baseline (n=93)Change at Week 2 (n=91)Change at Week 4 (n=93)Change at Week 8 (n=92)Change at Week 12 (n=90)Change at Week 16 (n=88)Change at Week 20 (n=86)Change at Week 24 (n=88)Change at Week 28 (n=82)Change at Week 36 (n=85)Change at Week 42 (n=35)Change at Week 48 (n=79)Change at Week 52 (n=36)Change at Week 60 (n=40)Change at Week 72 (n=38)Change at End of study (n=93)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/481.3726-0.0724-0.0704-0.0442-0.0655-0.0829-0.0847-0.0689-0.05640.0004-0.0623-0.00410.0011-0.0184-0.02650.0099

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of study drug and up to Day 126 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 72

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsTESAEs
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/481026

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) Less Than (<) 25 International Units (IU/mL) Undetectable or Detectable/Undetectable

Percentage of participants with HCV RNA less than (<) 25 IU/mL undetectable (undet.) or detectable (det.)/undetectable at specific time points were observed. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4: < 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA undet. (n=105)Week 4:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA det./undet. (n=105)Week 12:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA undet. (n=97)Week 12:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA det./undet. (n=97)Week 24:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA undet. (n=90)Week 24:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA det./undet. (n=90)Week 48:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA undet. (n=20)Week 48:< 25 IU/mL HCV-RNA det./undet. (n=20)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4865.788.694.897.990.093.3100100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 24 (SVR 24)

The SVR 24 was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) undetectable at the actual end of treatment (EOT), and HCV RNA levels <25 IU/mL undetectable or HCV RNA levels <25 IU/mL detectable at 24 weeks after end of treatment. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after end of treatment (Week 24 or 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4872.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough

Confirmed increase of more than 1 log10 IU per mL in HCV RNA level from the lowest level reached, or a confirmed HCV RNA level of more than 100 IU per mL in participants whose HCV RNA levels had previously been below the limit of quantification (less than 25 IU per mL detectable) or undetectable (less than 25 IU per mL undetectable), while on study therapy. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Week 1 to 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4811.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Participants With Virologic Failure

Participants had confirmed HIV virologic failure if HIV viral load values were greater than or equal to 50 or 200 copies/mL among those who previously had less than 50 copies/mL. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 72.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Greater than or equal to 50 copies/mLGreater than or equal to 200 copies/mL
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/485.42.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normalized Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

Participants with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels observed whose alanine aminotransferase levels were out of range at Baseline. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4881.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 12 (SVR 12)

The SVR 12 was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) undetectable at the actual end of treatment (EOT), and HCV RNA levels <25 IU/mL undetectable or HCV RNA levels <25 IU/mL detectable at 12 Weeks after end of treatment. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after end of treatment (Week 24 or 48)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4873.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure

Participants were considered as an on-treatment failure if, at actual end of treatment (EOT), there was confirmed detectable HCV RNA levels. (NCT01479868)
Timeframe: Week 1 to 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TMC435 150mg 12Wks PR24/4817

[back to top]

CD4+ T-Cell Count (CD4) Change From Baseline

Change in CD4 T-cell count was calculated as value at the post entry visit minus the value at entry. (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: Entry and weeks (W) 8, 12, 24, 28, 40, 48, 52, 60, 72

,
Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
W8 CD4 change (A: n=115, B: n=101)W12 CD4 change (A: n=106, B: n=95)W24 CD4 change (A: n=61, B: n=52)W28 CD4 change (A: n=53, B: n=44)W40 CD4 change (A: n=50, B: n=37)W48 CD4 change (A: n=22, B: n=35)W52 CD4 change (A: n=23, B: n=0)W60 CD4 change (A: n=39, B: n=36)W72 CD4 change (A: n=33, B: n=27)
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)-170-202-263-284-276-237NA-79-15
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)-174-194-277-304-128-220-24-348

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4, 8 and 12 Study Visits

Undetectable HCV RNA was defined as below the lower limit of quantitation of the assay and target not detected by Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test v2.0. (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: Weeks (W) 4, 8, 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
W4 HCV RNA (A: n=122, B: n=116)W8 HCV RNA (A: n=117, B: n=104)W12 HCV RNA (A: n=109, B: n=99)
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)32843
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)94868

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After Treatment Discontinuation (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (below the lower limit of quantitation of the assay and target not detected by Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test v2.0) at 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Participants without HCV RNA for SVR12 determination were considered not to have achieved SVR12. (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)35.6
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)30.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants who experienced an AE (sign or symptom or laboratory abnormality) of Grade 3 or higher at any time after baseline while on study. The AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening. (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: From study treatment dispensation to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)74.1
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)73.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Viral Load <50 Copies/mL

HIV-1 RNA testing was performed with Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay (LLOQ=40 copies/mL) or with Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/Taqman HIV-1 assay (LLOQ=20 copies/mL). (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: Entry and weeks (W) 4, 8, 12, 24, 28, 40, 48, 52, 60, 72

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
W0 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=133, B: n=122)W4 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=123, B: n=114)W8 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=117, B: n=104)W12 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=108, B: n=99)W24 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=62, B: n=52)W28 HIV-1 RNA: (A: n=54, B: n=45)W40 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=52, B: n=38)W48 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=23, B: n=33)W52 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=24, B: n=0)W60 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=40, B: n=36)W72 HIV-1 RNA (A: n=34, B: n=27)
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)92.696.596.298.0100.0100.0100.0100.0NA97.2100.0
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)100.098.4100.098.1100.098.192.3100.0100.0100.097.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After Treatment Discontinuation (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (below the lower limit of quantitation of the assay and target not detected by Roche COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test v2.0) at 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Participants without HCV RNA for SVR24 determination were considered not to have achieved SVR24. (NCT01482767)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HCV Treatment-Naive (Group A)34.8
HCV Treatment-Experienced (Group B)25.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Virologic Failure

Virologic failure is defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels more than 1,000 IU/mL at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, or 40. (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, or Week 40

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment-naïve1
Treatment-experienced2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

A eRVR is defined as having hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than 25 IU/mL, (target not detected) at Weeks 4 and 12 of treatment. (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment-naïve13
Treatment-experienced18

[back to top]

Median Change in log10 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)

Changes from baseline in log10 HCV RNA levels were calculated. (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, and Week 48

,
InterventionLog 10 IU/mL (Median)
Baseline (n=16, 20)Week 4 (n=16, 20)Week 8 (n=16,19)Week 12 (n=15,19)Week 24 (n=14, 19)Week 32 (n=2, 12)Week 40 (n=2, 12)Week 48 (n=2, 12)
Treatment-experienced6.10-5.33-5.39-5.39-5.39-5.46-5.46-5.46
Treatment-naïve6.20-5.47-5.50-5.46-5.53-5.30-5.30-3.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Specific Category of Treatment Outcome

Participants were evaluated for following 4 categories of treatment outcome;Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Last Planned Dose of Study Medication(SVR12):hepatitis C virus (HCV)ribonucleic acid (RNA)<25 IU/mL(target not detected)12 weeks after last planned dose of study medication;Relapse:HCV RNA =>25 IU/mL during follow-up period after previous HCV RNA<25 IU/mL at planned end of treatment(EOT)[Week 24 or Week 48] and participant did not achieve SVR12planned;On treatment virologic failure:meeting virologic stopping rule and/or having detectable HCV RNA at EOT with viral breakthrough(having a confirmed increase >1 log 10 in HCV RNA level from the lowest level reached or confirmed value of HCV RNA >100 IU/mL in participants whose HCV RNA has previously become <25 IU/mL during treatment).Stopping rule defined as HCV RNA value >1000 IU/mL at Week 4, 8 or 12 or detectable HCV RNA at Week 24, 32 or 40;Other:HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at actual EOT and never HCV RNA =>25 IU/mL thereafter. (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: From Day 1 (Baseline) up to Follow-up visit (Week 36 or Week 60)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SVR12RelapseOn treatment virologic failureOther
Treatment-experienced16121
Treatment-naïve14011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than 25 IU/mL, (Target Not Detected) at Weeks 8, 12, 24, 32, 40 and 48

The table below shows number of participants with HCV RNA Less than 25 IU/mL, (target not detected) at Weeks 8, 12, 24, 32, 40 and 48. Only 3 treatment-naive and 14 Treatment-experienced participants were assigned to receive study treatment after Week 24. Only participants still receiving Treatment were assessed at 32, 40, and 48 weeks. (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 12, 24, 32, 40 and 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 8 (n=16, 20)Week 12 (n=16, 20)Week 24 (n=16, 20)Week 32 (n=3, 14)Week 40 (n=3, 14)Week 48 (n=3, 14)
Treatment-experienced191918121212
Treatment-naïve161515221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) at Week 4

A RVR is defined as having hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than 25 IU/mL, (target not detected) at Week 4 (NCT01498068)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment-naïve14
Treatment-experienced18

[back to top]

Percentage of Relapse-Free Subjects at Month 12 and Month 24

Relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)75.060.0
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo67.550.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Number of New T1 (Hypointense) Lesions

Cumulative number of new T1 (Hypointense) lesions were reported. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionLesions (Mean)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)0.58
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo0.39

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory assessment included haematology, chemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: From screening up to Month 24

InterventionSubjects (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)9
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With One Concomitant Medication From Baseline up to Month 24

Number of subjects with at least one concomitant medication from baseline up to month 24 were reported. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionSubjects (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)28
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo20

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Treated With Glucocorticoids Due to Relapses During 24 Months

Relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. Percentage of subjects treated with glucocorticoids due to relapses during 24 Months were reported here. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)30.0
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo35.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Active (New/Enlarging) T2 Lesions at Month 24

A single T2 lesion was defined as an area of increased signal on a given 3-millimeters axial image that was not referable to normally hyperintense structures. New T2 lesions were those that appear in areas where on the previous scan no abnormality was detected. All T2 lesions were detected by an MRI scan. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 24

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)20.0
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo17.5

[back to top]

Time on Treatment (Adherence to Treatment)

Time up to which subjects were adhered to the treatment was reported. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2.2 years

InterventionYears (Median)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)1.93
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo1.92

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio for Time to First Documented Relapse

Relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. Hazard ratio for time to first documented relapse was planned to be reported as per SAP. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Date at which first Relapse Occurs assessed up to 24 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + [Curcumin (BCM95) and Placebo]0.808

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Serious AE (SAE), TEAE Leading to Death and Discontinuation

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 24 months. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Subjects with TEAESubjects with TE-SAESubjects with TEAEs leading to discontinuationSubjects with TEAEs leading to death
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)16110
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo16030

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Free From Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression at Month 12 and 24

Disability progression was assessed using EDSS. EDSS is based on a standardized neurological exam and focuses on symptoms that commonly occur in multiple sclerosis (MS) . Overall scores ranges from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (death due to MS). Disability progression was defined as an increase of EDSS score of at least 1.0 point compared to baseline for subjects with an EDSS =< 4.0. For subjects with an EDSS= 0 at baseline, EDSS progression was defined as an increase of EDSS score of at least 1.5 point. Percentage of subjects free from EDSS progression at Month 12 and 24 were reported (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)92.590.0
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo82.585.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions at Month 12 and 24

CUA lesion was defined as new gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions on T1-weighted, or new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI scans, without double counting. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)7.515.0
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo17.512.5

[back to top]

Annualized Relapse Rate at Month 12 and 24

Relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. Annualized relapse rate was calculated by dividing the total number of relapse events by the total number of days subjects participated in the study. This number was then multiplied by 365.25 to get an annualized rate. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionRelapse per year (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)1.731.05
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo1.401.14

[back to top]

Total Number of Reported Relapses at Month 3, 6, 12 and 24

Relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6, 12 and 24

,
InterventionRelapses (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)1.001.001.501.57
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo1.001.001.001.75

[back to top]

Mean Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions at Month 12 and 24

New Gd-enhancing Lesions are a measure of inflammatory activity and were assessed using the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)0.190.21
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo0.460.13

[back to top]

Mean Number of New T1 (Hypointense) Lesions at Month 12 and 24

Mean number of new T1 (Hypointense) Lesions represents a measure of accumulation of inflammatory disease burden assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)0.520.19
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo0.480.04

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Premature Termination From Treatment

Number of subjects with premature termination from treatment were reported. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Adverse eventConsent withdrawnLost to follow upProtocol ViolationUnspecified
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)12026
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo31237

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio for Time to First Sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression

EDSS progression is based on a standardized neurological exam and focuses on symptoms that commonly occur in MS. Overall scores ranges from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (death due to MS). A sustained progression on EDSS score was defined as an EDSS progression confirmed into two consecutive assessment. EDSS values obtained during clinical attacks are not excluded for the assessment of EDSS progression. However, EDSS values obtained during MS attacks that are not confirmed after two consecutive assessments will be excluded from statistical analysis of confirmed EDSS progression. Hazard ratio for time to first sustained EDSS progression was planned to be reported as per SAP. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Baseline to date at which the first confirmed EDSS progression occurs, assessed up to 24 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + [Curcumin (BCM95) and Placebo]0.309

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Active (New or Enlarging) T2 Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 12

A single T2 lesion was defined as an area of increased signal on a given 3-millimeters axial image that was not referable to normally hyperintense structures. New T2 lesions were those that appear in areas where on the previous scan no abnormality was detected. All T2 lesions were detected by an MRI scan. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)4
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo7

[back to top]

Flu-like Symptoms (FLS) Assessed by FLS Scale Score

Flu-like symptoms were measured using FLS score in which subjects were scored as per the presence and intensity of muscle aches, chills, and weakness, each separately, on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0 = absent; 1 = mild, do not interfere with daily activities; 2 = moderate, sufficient to interfere with daily activities; and 3 = severe, bed rest require. Body temperature also was also recorded to determine the presence of fever using the following scale: 0 (≤ 37.2 °C); 1 (≥ 37.3 °C but < 37.8 °C); 2 (≥ 37.8 but < 38.4 °C); and 3 (≥ 38.4 °C).The scores for each symptom (muscle aches, chills, weakness, body temperature) was added together to provide the combined flu-like symptom score ranging from 0 to 12 where 0 indicates absence of any symptom and 12 indicates the worst severity of the symptoms. (NCT01514370)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12 and 24

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 12Month 24
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Curcumin (BCM95)2.392.221.911.961.451.68
IFN Beta 1a 44 mcg TIW + Placebo2.432.061.891.911.360.93

[back to top]

Change in Quantitative HBs Antigen at Week 12

Change in quantitative HBs antigen at week 12. The data were log transformed before analysis and the changes to baseline were analysed. Therefore, the reported values might be interpreted as percentage changes. Lower scores mean a better outcome. (NCT01524679)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionIU/ml (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Group0.7058
Control Group0.9380

[back to top]

Change in Quantitative HBs Antigen at Week 24

Change in quantitative HBs antigen at week 24. The data were log transformed before analysis and the changes to baseline were analysed. Therefore, the reported values might be interpreted as percentage changes. Lower scores mean a better outcome. (NCT01524679)
Timeframe: week 24

InterventionIU/ml (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Group0.3694
Control Group0.7995

[back to top]

Cmax of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA2700010100
Group B109003140016000

[back to top]

Cmax of Caffeine

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A5170489048305590
Group B5340722065306450

[back to top]

Cmax of 1-OH-Midazolam (1-hydroxy-midazolam)

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A5.576.506.465.05
Group B6.686.525.024.67

[back to top]

C6hr of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168

Concentration of an analyte in plasma at 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 14)
Group ANA69803360
Group B2250102007460

[back to top]

C6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)

Concentration of an analyte in plasma at 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 14)
Group ANA508295
Group B159962712

[back to top]

C6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)

Concentration of an analyte in plasma at 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 14)
Group ANA112002740
Group B4330175005780

[back to top]

C6hr of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)

Concentration of an analyte in plasma at 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 14)
Group ANA179005080
Group B58002080010100

[back to top]

C24hr of Faldaprevir (BI 201335)

Concentration of an analyte in plasma at 24 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=15,0)Day 17 (N=14,19)Day 66 (N=13,14)
Group A98336701140
Group BNA54102580

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity of Tolbutamide

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity. (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=13, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 18)Day 66 (N=12, 15)
Group A1940000180000015200001330000
Group B2220000194000014100001390000

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity of Midazolam

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity. (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A79.711712775.5
Group B10713014095.6

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity of Caffeine

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity. (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 15)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A549004210071900120000
Group B77500142000170000159000

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity of 1-OH-Midazolam (1-hydroxy-midazolam)

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity. (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 13)
Group A23.624.223.518.3
Group B26.028.522.820.8

[back to top]

AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA4170019300
Group B133006220039100

[back to top]

AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA6180015000
Group B243009880027600

[back to top]

AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir (BI 207127)

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA11900036200
Group B4110013500059200

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Faldaprevir (BI 201335) From 0 to 24 Hours

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 24 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=15,0)Day 17 (N=14,19)Day 66 (N=13,15)
Group A4560013800056200
Group BNA17300097300

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (SVR12)

Sustained virologic response (SVR12): Plasma Hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level <25 IU/mL(international units per millilitre) undetectable at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. SVR12 was analyzed in a descriptive manner using frequency of participants who achieved SVR12. (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A13
Group B13
Group C11
Group D10
Group E3

[back to top]

Cmax of Faldaprevir (BI 201335)

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=15,0)Day 17 (N=14,14)Day 66 (N=13,15)
Group A352087804410
Group BNA99506690

[back to top]

Cmax of Tolbutamide

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A152000146000130000110000
Group B170000158000126000127000

[back to top]

Cmax of Midazolam

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: 5 min before and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h, 26h, 28h, 29:55h, 32h after first drug administration on day 1 also 5 min before, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after drug on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (N=16, 19)Day 9 (N=15, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group A21.129.931.921.3
Group B23.829.828.823.2

[back to top]

AUC 0-6hr of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 6 hours (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA29801620
Group B89357003510

[back to top]

Cmax of Deleobuvir Reduction Metabolite CD 6168

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA85204510
Group B3040124008880

[back to top]

Cmax of Deleobuvir Metabolite CD 6168 ag (Acylglucuronide)

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA596386
Group B2031130806

[back to top]

Cmax of Deleobuvir Metabolite Acyl-glucuronide (BI 208333)

Maximum concentration of an analyte in plasma (NCT01525628)
Timeframe: PK plasma samples were taken at: 5 minutes before drug administration and 1 hour (h), 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5:55h, 8h, 10h, 11:55h, 15h, 23:55h after first drug administration on days 9, 17 and 66.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 9 (N=0, 17)Day 17 (N=14, 19)Day 66 (N=13, 15)
Group ANA127003790
Group B5620202006550

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Depression

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I) scale was used to measure this outcome. The scale consists of 21 items to assess the intensity of depression in clinical and normal patients. Each item is a list of four statements arranged in increasing severity about a particular symptom of depression. Each item was scored from 0 - 3. If more than one score was provided for an item, the maximum score was considered the item score. The total score was calculated as the sum of all individual items and then compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard key ranges were: 0 - 9 indicated minimal depression; 10 - 18 indicated mild depression; 19 - 29 indicated moderate depression and 30 - 63 indicated severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. (NCT01534182)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Fingolimod-2.88
Standard Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT)-1.86

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Treatment Satisfaction

The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) contains 14 items assessing the following 4 domains: effectiveness (items 1 - 3), side effects (items 4 - 8), convenience (items 9 - 11) and global satisfaction (items 12 - 14). The primary outcome was measured on the global satisfaction domain. Item 12 scored as 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident); item 13 scored as 1 (not at all certain) to 5 (extremely certain); and item 14 scored as 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied). Responses to items were summed and transformed: specifically, TSQM v 1.4 domain scale scores were computed by adding the items loading on each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from the composite score and divided by the greatest possible score range. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. The final transformed score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction. (NCT01534182)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Fingolimod22.69
Standard Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT)13.92

[back to top] [back to top]

Changes in Patient-reported Effectiveness, Side Effects and Convenience

TSQM v 1.4 domains for effectiveness, side effects and convenience were used to evaluate this outcome. The effectiveness domain for items 1 - 3 was scored as: 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied). For the side effects domain, item 4 scored as 0(no) or 1(yes); item 5 scored as 1 (extremely bothersome) to 5 (not at all bothersome); and items 6 - 8 scored as 1 (a great deal) to 5 (not at all). For the convenience domain, items 9 and 10 scored as 1(extremely difficult) to 7 (extremely easy), and item 11 scored as 1 (extremely inconvenient) to 7 (extremely convenient). For each domain, scale scores were computed by adding the items loading on each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from the composite score and divided by the greatest possible score range. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. The final transformed score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction. (NCT01534182)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
EffectivenessSide effectsConvenience
Fingolimod21.5726.7525.38
Standard Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT)11.5613.0710.57

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and death throughout the study. (NCT01534182)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse events (serious and non-serious)Serious adverse eventsDeaths
Fingolimod7320
Standard Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT)2600

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 Achieving SVR24

SVR24 rates were determined for only participants that had undetectable HCV RNA at Week 4 of treatment (Arm 1a and Arm 2a). HCV RNA viral load was determined using the Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan HCV Test v1.0, which has a lower limit of quantification of 43 IU/mL. (NCT01544920)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1a: Peg-IFN + RBV 24 Weeks87.0
Arm 2a: BOC + Peg-IFN + RBV 24 Weeks97.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) 24 Weeks After Completing Study Treatment (SVR24)

SVR24 rates were determined for all participants in Arm 1 and Arm 2. HCV RNA viral load was determined using the Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan HCV Test v1.0, which has a lower limit of quantification of 43 IU/mL. (NCT01544920)
Timeframe: Up to Week 74

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Peg-IFN + RBV86.7
Arm 2: BOC + Peg-IFN + RBV88.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

The median time, in months, from randomization to OS event assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. One month=30.4 days (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab MonotherapyNA
Rituximab + IFNNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

An overall survival event was defined as death due to any cause. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab Monotherapy13
Rituximab + IFN11

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

The median time, in months, from randomization to disease progression event assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. One month=30.4 days (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab Monotherapy25.0
Rituximab + IFN32.0

[back to top]

Treatment Failure - Percentage of Participants With an Event

Treatment failure was defined as an event of any of the following: progressive disease while receiving study treatment, death due to any cause, or the initiation of another type of treatment due to stable disease, progressive disease or relapse, or intolerance to study treatment. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL), Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab Monotherapy68
Rituximab + IFN67

[back to top]

Treatment Failure - Time to Event

The median time, in months, between randomization and treatment failure event determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab Monotherapy21.5
Rituximab + IFN28.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The median time, in months, from the date of the first observation of CR, CRu, or PR and the date of progressive disease (PD), censored observation, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as an increase of >50% compared to BL in the sum of the product of the two largest perpendicular parameters of measurable lymphoma, or the occurrence of new lesions. One month=30.4 days. Response duration was calculated amongst responders (CR+CRu+PR) with cutoffs for follow-up applied. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
CR+CRu+PR (n=102,113)CR+CRu only (n=62,73)CR only (n=50,62)
Rituximab + IFN30.044.450.7
Rituximab Monotherapy22.0NA59.5

[back to top]

Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event

Response duration was defined as the period between the date for first observation of CR, CRu or PR and the date of progressive disease (PD), censored observation or death of any cause. Response duration was also assessed for response defined as CR only. Response duration was calculated among responders (CR+CRu+PR) with cutoffs for follow-up applied. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR, CRu, and PR (n=102,113)CR and CRu only (n=62,73)CR only (n=50,62)
Rituximab + IFN655348
Rituximab Monotherapy634438

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving CR or CRu

CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all previously detectable disease signs; the absence of palpable lymph nodes >1 cm or nodes >1.5 cm observed in CATscan; and negative bone marrow pathology, if initially positive. CRu was defined as CR, except that bone marrow results were indeterminate. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: Weeks 10 and 16

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 10, Cycle 1 (n=156,157)Week 16, Cycle 2 (n=123,124)
Rituximab + IFN941
Rituximab Monotherapy824

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed CR (CRu), or Partial Response (PR)

CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all previously detectable disease signs; the absence of palpable lymph nodes greater than (>) 1 centimeter (cm) or nodes >1.5 cm observed in computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan; and negative bone marrow pathology, if initially positive. CRu was defined as CR, except that bone marrow results were indeterminate. PR was defined as a decrease of greater than or equal to (≥) 50 percent (%) compared with the BL value in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters in all measurable and evaluable lesions; and a ≥50% reduction of the size from BL if hepato-splenomegaly was present. (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: Weeks 10 and 16

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 10, Cycle 1 (n=156,157)Week 16, Cycle 2 (n=123,124)
Rituximab + IFN5982
Rituximab Monotherapy5474

[back to top]

Disease Progression - Percentage of Participants With an Event

A disease progression event was defined as tumor progression or death due to any cause (or a censored observation). (NCT01609010)
Timeframe: BL, Week 10 and 16, and Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 42 of the follow-up period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab Monotherapy60
Rituximab + IFN62

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than lower limit of quantitation [LLOQ] 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV). (NCT01609933)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last dose of study drugs (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV); approximately 36 weeks after subject's initial dose of study drug in Substudy 1

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-DAA + PegIFN/RBV81.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response 24 Weeks Post Treatment (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA level less than the LLOQ 24 weeks after the last dose of study drugs (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV). (NCT01609933)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last dose of study drugs (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV); approximately 48 weeks after subject's initial dose of study drug in Substudy 1

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-DAA + PegIFN/RBV78.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

eRVR was defined as HCV RNA level < LLOQ at Substudy 1 treatment weeks 4 through 12 without a confirmed HCV RNA >= LLOQ (NCT01609933)
Timeframe: Treatment weeks 4 through 12 of Substudy 1 (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-DAA + PegIFN/RBV87.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity after initiation of study drug through 30 days post-DAA dosing. For more details on AEs, see the AE section. (NCT01609933)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug (DAAs plus pegIFN alpha-2a and RBV) (up to 28 weeks).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
2-DAA TEAE2-DAA TESAE
2-DAA + PegIFN/RBV291

[back to top]

Change in Patient Visual Analog Scale Score for Pre-injection Anxiety

"The primary endpoint of the study was a change in patient self-reported 100 mm (10 cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pre-injection anxiety. VAS scale (min=0- max=100 mm (10cm)) 0= no anxiety; 100 mm (10 cm)=very severe anxiety.~Data from Weeks 2 and 3 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 30 gauge needle was used for injection. The 30 gauge needle VAS mean refers to the mean for pre-injection anxiety for that needle size.~Data from Weeks 4 and 5 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 25 gauge needle was used for injection. The 25 gauge needle VAS mean refers to the mean for pre-injection anxiety for that needle size." (NCT01641120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5

Interventioncm (Mean)
25 Gauge1.58
30 Gauge2.22

[back to top]

Fear of Injection

"Secondary endpoint was assessment of fear of injection based on patient questionnaires completed prior to each injection. The patient will respond to each statement on a scale which ranges from 1 (almost always) to 4 (almost never).~Data from Weeks 2 and 3 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 30 gauge needle was used for injection. Mean describes fear of injection for the 30 gauge needle.~Data from Weeks 4 and 5 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 25 gauge needle was used for injection. Mean describes fear of injection for the 25 gauge needle." (NCT01641120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25 Gauge1.38
30 Gauge1.41

[back to top]

Perception of Needle

"Secondary endpoint was assessment of the perception of the needle based on patient questionnaires completed after each injection. The patient will respond to each statement on a scale which ranges from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree).~A total of 6 statements were given to the participant the more strongly the participant agreed with the statement, the more favorably they perceived the needle.~Data from Weeks 2 and 3 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 30 gauge needle was used for injection. Mean describes perception of the 30 gauge needle.~Data from Weeks 4 and 5 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 25 gauge needle was used for injection. Mean describes perception of the 25 gauge needle." (NCT01641120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25 Gauge2.58
30 Gauge1.94

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale Score for Post-injection Pain

"The primary endpoint of the study was a change in patient self-reported 100 mm (10 cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for post-injection pain.VAS scale (min=0 - max=100 mm (10 cm)) 0= no pain; 100 mm (10 cm)=very severe pain.~Data from Weeks 2 and 3 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 30 gauge needle was used for injection. The 30 gauge needle VAS mean refers to the mean for post-injection pain for that needle size.~Data from Weeks 4 and 5 were combined and averaged to obtain a single value as both weeks a 25 gauge needle was used for injection. The 25 gauge needle VAS mean refers to the mean for post-injection pain for that needle size." (NCT01641120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5

Interventioncm (Mean)
25 Gauge1.201
30 Gauge0.764

[back to top]

Percentage of HBeAg(-) Participants Achieving Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

The Roche COBAS TaqMan HBV-(High Pure System Assay) was used to measure HBV DNA in blood samples of HBeAg(-) participants. The percentage of HBeAg(-) participants with HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment was reported. (NCT01641926)
Timeframe: FU Week 24 (Study Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBeAg(-) PEG-Intron30.4
HBeAg(-) PEGASYS33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(-) Participants Achieving Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

ALT normalization is a desired goal of HBV treatment, which is defined as having abnormal ALT levels at baseline and subsequently normal ALT levels after receiving treatment, where normal is defined as ≤ 1x the upper limit of normal (ULN). The percentage of HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(-) participants achieving ALT normalization at 24 weeks post-treatment was reported. (NCT01641926)
Timeframe: FU Week 24 (Study Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBeAg(+) PEG-Intron49.3
HBeAg(+) PEGASYS47.2
HBeAg(-) PEG-Intron71.4
HBeAg(-) PEGASYS61.4

[back to top]

Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving HBeAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

Blood samples were drawn to assess the participant's seroconversion status at Follow-up (FU) Week 24. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg in HBeAg(+) participants and development of antibody to HBeAg. (NCT01641926)
Timeframe: FU Week 24 (Study Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBeAg(+) PEG-Intron25.4
HBeAg(+) PEGASYS23.6

[back to top]

Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

The Roche COBAS TaqMan HBV-(High Pure System Assay) was used to measure HBV DNA in blood samples of HBeAg(+)participants. The percentage of HBeAg(+) participants with HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment was reported. (NCT01641926)
Timeframe: FU Week 24 (Study Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBeAg(+) PEG-Intron23.9
HBeAg(+) PEGASYS21.5

[back to top]

Percentage of HBeAg(+) Participants Achieving the Combined Response of HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks Post-treatment

HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg in HBeAg(+) participants and development of antibody to HBeAg. HBV DNA levels in blood were measured by the Roche COBAS TaqMan HBV-(High Pure System Assay). The percentage of HBeAg(+) participants with the combined response of achieving both HBeAg conversion and HBV DNA levels <2000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment was reported. (NCT01641926)
Timeframe: FU Week 24 (Study Week 72)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBeAg(+) PEG-Intron14.8
HBeAg(+) PEGASYS13.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of mean corpuscle volume at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the mean corpuscle volume values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Mean corpuscle volume; Week1; n=38, 39, 14, 12Mean corpuscle volume; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 12Mean corpuscle volume; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Mean corpuscle volume; Week6; n=41, 38, 12, 13Mean corpuscle volume; Week8; n=39, 39, 13, 13Mean corpuscle volume; Week12; n=38, 34, 12, 12
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1.1-20.32.33.85.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.8-1.40.21.834.2
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.7-1.5-0.21.42.23.8
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.4-1.4-0.8-0.23.15.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Duration, Uncorrected QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected Bazett's Formula (QTcB), QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

The ECG parameters including PR interval, QRS duration, uncorrected QT interval, QTcB, QTcF were measured at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 12. Change from Baseline in ECG parameters are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1 and 12

,,,
InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR interval, Week 1, n=41, 40, 15, 12PR interval, Week 12, n=38, 35, 12, 13QRS duration, Week 1, n=41, 40, 15,12QRS duration, Week 12, n=38, 35, 12,13Uncorrected QT Interval, Week 1, n=41,40,15,12Uncorrected QT interval, Week 12,n=38,35,12,13QTcB interval, Week 1, n=41,40,15,12QTcB interval, Week 12,n=38,35,12,13QTcF interval, Week 1, n=41,40,15,12QTcF interval, Week 12,n=38,35,12,13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV0.52.9-6.6-8.2-2.3-11.87.708711.55124.19953.3516
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.23.20.4-1.8-2.6-120.24911.7615-0.7151-3.1442
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-1.60.20.4-25.9-4.619.887918.994314.918710.7637
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV2.75.52.90.4-2.1-179.811211.28015.76761.6147

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red blood cell count at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the red blood cell count values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Red Blood Cell count; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Red Blood Cell count; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Red Blood Cell count; Week 30; n=13,10,2,2Red Blood Cell count; Week 36; n=12,7,1,2Red Blood Cell count; Week 42; n=10,6,2,2Red Blood Cell count; Week 48; n=9, 6,1,2Red Blood Cell count; PT Week 4; n=32,34,11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1.13-1.13-1.05-0.88-0.91-0.83-0.57
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.88-0.94-0.75-1.06-1.17-1.03-0.37
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.99-1.14-1.45-1.3-1.45-1.5-0.65
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-1.19-1.19-1.45-1-0.55-0.4-0.66

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red blood cell count at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the red blood cell count values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Red Blood Cell count; Week1; n=38, 39, 14, 12Red Blood Cell count; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 12Red Blood Cell count; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Red Blood Cell count; Week6; n=41, 38, 12, 13Red Blood Cell count; Week8; n=39, 39, 13, 13Red Blood Cell count; Week12; n=38, 36, 12, 12
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.15-0.48-0.88-0.97-1.01-1.08
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.04-0.44-0.64-0.78-0.82-0.79
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.13-0.28-0.72-0.86-0.85-0.92
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.18-0.57-1.03-1.28-1.45-1.61

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood pressure measurements were taken to observe vital signs and included SBP and DBP at the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and Post-treatment (PT) Follow Up (FU) Weeks 4, 12 and 24. Change from Baseline in SBP and DBP is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) up to 12-week treatment period

,,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
DBP; Day2; n=41, 40, 17, 13DBP; Week1; n=41, 39, 15, 13DBP; Week2; n=41, 39, 14, 13DBP; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13DBP; Week6; n=41, 39, 13, 13DBP; Week8; n=41, 39, 13, 13DBP; Week12; n=38, 35, 12, 13SBP; Day2; n=41, 40, 17, 13SBP; Week1; n=41, 39, 15, 13SBP; Week2; n=41, 39, 14, 13SBP; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13SBP; Week6; n=41, 39, 13, 13SBP; Week8; n=41, 39, 13, 13SBP; Week12; n=38, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1.2-0.4-0.4-1.2-1.2-2.10.3-1.40.9-2-3.6-0.4-3.7-1.9
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1-2.2-1.7-4.4-4.8-2.9-4.4-0.8-3-0.7-4.2-3.8-1.5-1.4
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-1.5-1-2.80.8-1.6-2.4-1-1.3-2.6-4.2-5.20.2-4.2-2.6
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-31-0.3-3.9-5.9-4.4-3.5-3.3-4.5-4.1-3.8-5.9-2.9-5.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of total bilirubin and creatinine at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the direct bilirubin, total bilirubin and creatinine values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment afterl Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total bilirubin; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Total bilirubin; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12,11Total bilirubin; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Total bilirubin; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Total bilirubin; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Total bilirubin; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Total bilirubin PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11,11Creatinine; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Creatinine; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Creatinine; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Creatinine; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Creatinine; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Creatinine; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Creatinine; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV0.5-0.1-0.200.1-0.7-4.6-1.55-2.240.662.331.23-2.351.23
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.710.81.91.53.5-2.4-2.4-1.972.822.994.9710.07-0.34
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV0.61.3-4-3-4-4-2.21.310.09-8.85-8-7.55-7.1-1.25
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-1.4-1.3-2.3-3-14NA-0.4-3.12-1.75-8.47-5.5-14.3NA-1.7

[back to top]

Mean GSK2336805 Plasma Concentrations on Day 1, Day 2, Week 4, and Week 12

Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected for all participants on Day 1 (0 hour [h]-1h, 1h-4h, 4h-8h, 8h-20h), Day 2 (Predose [20-28h]), Week 4 (Predose [20-28h], 0h-1h, 1h-4h, 4h-8h, 8h-20h, 20h-28h) and Week 12 (Predose [20-28h]). PK Population is comprised of all participants who received GSK2336805 and underwent plasma PK sampling (intensive or sparse) during the study. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Week 4, and Week 12

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Day 1 (0h-1h), n=1, 3Day 1 (1h-4h), n=35, 42Day 1 (4h-8h), n=0, 3Day 1 (8h-20h), n=0, 1Day 2 Predose (20-28h), n=36, 43Week 4 Predose (20-28h), n=33, 42Week 4 (0h-1h), n=2, 6Week 4 (1h-4h), n=46, 52Week 4 (4h-8h), n=22, 19Week 4 (8h-20h), n=1, 2Week 4 (20h-28h), n=11, 10Week 12 (Predose [20-28h]), n=26, 35
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCVNA290.39NANA53.7981.18198.4392.78215.55NA51.2445.99
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV604445.18221.33NA123.89146.85553591.07411.68192.566.29142.59

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Very Rapid Virologic Response (vRVR), Rapid Virologic Response (RVR), Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR), Sustained Virologic Response 12 and 24 (SVR12 and SVR24) With Response Guided Treatment (RGT)

Blood samples for the determination of HCV RNA levels were collected at Screening and Baseline, every study visit during the Treatment Period, and at PT FU Weeks 4, 12, and 24. vRVR is defined as plasma HCV RNA NCT01648140)
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to PT FU Week 24

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
vRVRRVRcEVRSVR12SVR24SVR24 with RGT
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV82333302717
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV122330262517
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV6913000
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV8101110109

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 12

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease(new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to Week 12

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV390
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV372
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV131
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV173

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any AEs and Any SAEs After Week 12

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease(new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: From Week 12 up to PT Week 24 FU

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV212
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV221
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV90
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV80

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Urinalysis Data up to Week 12

Urine samples were collected for urinalysis at Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 18, 24, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Number of participants with shift from Baseline in urinalysis to normal (NL), abnormal (ANL) and missing (MIS) data up to Week 12 are summarized. Urine bilirubin (UBIL), urine glucose (UGLU), urine ketones (UKET), urine leukocyte esterase test (ULET) for detecting WBC, urine nitrite (UNIT), urine occult blood (UOB) were performed with dipstick method. Urine microscopy (UM) is performed to detect bacteria (BAC), red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC). Other urinalysis parameter included urine pH (UpH) and urine specific gravity (USG). Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2 and 12

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 2, UBIL, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, UBIL, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 2, UGLU, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, UGLU, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 2, UKET, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, UKET, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 2, ULET, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, ULET, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 12, UMBT, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=1,1,0,0Week 12, UMRBC, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=4,5,2,2Week 12, UMWBC, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=4,5,2,2Week 2, UNIT, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, UNIT, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 2, UOB, BL MIS to PBL MIS, n=1,0,0,0Week 12, UOB, BL MIS to PBL MIS,n=37,34,12,13Week 2, UPH, BL NL to PBL NL, n=1, 0,0,0Week 12, UPH, BL NL to PBL NL, n=37,34,12,13Week 12, UPH, BL NL to PBL ANL, n=37,34,12,13Week 2, USG, BL NL to PBL NL, n=1, 0,0,0Week 12, USG, BL NL to PBL NL, n=37,34,12,13Week 12, USG, BL NL to PBL ANL,n=37,34,12,13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV13713713713714413713713611370
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV03403403403415503403403400340
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV01301301301302201301301300121
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV01201201201202201201201200120

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
ALP; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12ALP; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11ALP; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2ALP; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2ALP; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2ALP; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2ALP; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11ALT; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12ALT; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11ALT; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2ALT; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2ALT; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2ALT; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2ALT; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11AST; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12AST; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11AST; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2AST; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2AST; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2AST; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2AST; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11CK; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12CK; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11CK; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2CK; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2CK; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2CK; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2CK; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11GGT; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12GGT; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11GGT; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2GGT; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2GGT; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2GGT; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2GGT; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV2.50.81.825.39.8-4.9-38.9-43.9-34.8-30.2-34.3-38.8-45.5-13.1-16.5-15.1-11.8-14.2-12.8-19.5-44-34.5-33-18.9-0.210.5-17.9-37.3-38.3-44.2-51.5-44.6-37.8-43.4
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.13.3-6.42.73.34.2-6.3-22.9-31.3-45.1-16.6-14.3-10.8-33.3-3.5-11.8-18.7-7.3-5.8-2.2-15.6-28.3-18.7-15.8-26.7-29.722.3-26.4-12.3-12.5-32.8-19.7-19.7-16.8-17.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV6.44.522.51817.530-3.9-38.4-41.7-26-20.5-28-26.5-43.9-16.3-15.7-6.5-2.5-9-6.5-16-60.760.1-78.5-69-81-82.5258.7-34.2-35.7-12-10-9-9.5-41.4
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV2.22.1-82.5-2NA-7-38.6-39.7-57.7-69-122NA-31.5-18.8-23.8-27.7-27.5-54NA-17.7-38.7-39-30-37.5-32NA-21.7-30.2-37.4-38.7-40.5-17NA-30.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count and white blood cell count at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count and white blood cell count values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11Basophils; Week2; n=40, 38, 14, 10Basophils; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Basophils; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12Basophils; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13Basophils; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12Eosinophils; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11Eosinophils; Week2; n=40, 38, 14, 10Eosinophils; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Eosinophils; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12Eosinophils; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13Eosinophils; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12Lymphocytes; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11Lymphocytes; Week2; n=40, 38, 14, 10Lymphocytes; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Lymphocytes; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12Lymphocytes; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13Lymphocytes; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12Monocytes; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11Monocytes; Week2; n=40, 38, 14, 10Monocytes; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Monocytes; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12Monocytes; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13Monocytes; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12Total Neutrophils; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11Total Neutrophils; Week 2; n=40, 38, 14, 10Total Neutrophils; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Total Neutrophils; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12Total Neutrophils; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13Total Neutrophils; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12Platelet Count; Week1; n=38, 39, 14, 11Platelet Count; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 11Platelet Count; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Platelet Count; Week6; n=41, 38, 12, 13Platelet Count; Week8; n=39, 39, 13, 13Platelet Count; Week12; n=38, 34, 12, 12White Blood Cell count; Week1; n=38, 38, 14, 11White Blood Cell count; Week2; n=40, 38, 14, 10White Blood Cell count; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13White Blood Cell count; Week6; n=41, 37, 12, 12White Blood Cell count; Week8; n=38, 39, 13, 13White Blood Cell count; Week12; n=37, 36, 12, 12
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.011-0.014-0.017-0.015-0.019-0.018-0.051-0.08-0.105-0.117-0.121-0.118-0.319-0.448-0.787-0.963-0.953-1.118-0.103-0.122-0.151-0.182-0.229-0.185-2.338-2.114-2.487-2.51-2.706-2.894-58.5-58-54.4-66.8-74.9-73.4-2.83-2.77-3.55-3.78-4.03-4.33
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.011-0.01-0.012-0.013-0.016-0.013-0.075-0.111-0.132-0.134-0.134-0.112-0.282-0.603-0.854-1.043-1.061-1.074-0.056-0.061-0.129-0.171-0.165-0.183-1.871-2.121-2.333-2.247-2.168-2.188-51.4-57.8-55.9-71.9-75.7-85.3-2.3-2.92-3.47-3.62-3.55-3.58
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.013-0.009-0.015-0.013-0.012-0.012-0.085-0.114-0.108-0.109-0.104-0.102-0.371-0.553-0.773-0.93-0.964-1.048-0.025-0.034-0.055-0.135-0.124-0.133-1.378-1.468-1.603-1.683-1.613-1.483-33.1-34.4-33.8-46-52.6-53-1.87-2.17-2.55-2.85-2.8-2.77
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.012-0.009-0.01-0.013-0.009-0.011-0.059-0.059-0.079-0.113-0.13-0.106-0.608-0.675-0.989-1.334-1.256-1.4380.034-0.091-0.126-0.245-0.185-0.219-1.158-1.186-1.412-1.413-1.222-1.649-59.5-41.4-56.2-71.3-60.1-58.8-1.81-2.01-2.61-3.09-2.8-3.42

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Chloride, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Inorganic Phosphorus and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Chloride, bicarbonate, glucose, potassium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus and urea/BUN at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the chloride, bicarbonate, glucose, potassium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus and urea/BUN values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Chloride; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Chloride; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Chloride; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Chloride; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Chloride; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Chloride; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13Bicarbonate; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Bicarbonate; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Bicarbonate; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Bicarbonate; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Bicarbonate; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Bicarbonate; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13Glucose; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Glucose; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Glucose; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Glucose; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Glucose; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Glucose; Week12; n=38, 35, 12, 13Potassium; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Potassium; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Potassium; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Potassium; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Potassium; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Potassium; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13Sodium; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Sodium; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Sodium; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Sodium; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Sodium; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Sodium; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week2; n=41,38,14,13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week4; n=41,39,14,13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week6; n=41,38,13,13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week8; n=40,39,13,13Inorganic Phosphorus; Week12; n=37,35,12,13Urea/BUN; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Urea/BUN; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Urea/BUN; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Urea/BUN; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Urea/BUN; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Urea/BUN; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV0.50.71.71.621.50-0.3-0.9-0.4-0.7-0.6-0.37-0.22-0.03-0.15-0.05-0.3-0.02-0.1-0.16-0.15-0.11-0.15-0.4-0.10.10.20.30.1-0.13-0.141-0.151-0.171-0.169-0.1720.240.20.03-0.04-0.16-0.08
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.40.110.80.70.1-0.9-0.8-0.8-0.7-0.8-0.9-0.34-0.170.02-0.18-0.06-0.39-0.06-0.12-0.11-0.16-0.19-0.21-0.8-0.6-0.1-0.3-0.6-0.3-0.086-0.108-0.125-0.181-0.23-0.1680.04-0.13-0.4-0.29-0.46-0.31
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.2-0.70.1-0.1-0.81.2-0.7-0.2-0.50.60-0.50.360.13-0.48-0.55-0.36-0.45-0.02-0.02-0.05-0.21-0.14-0.1-0.8-1.3-0.80-0.60.5-0.087-0.105-0.078-0.159-0.14-0.136-0.01-0.12-0.88-1.02-0.85-0.64
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV0.60.51.60.82.21.9-1.2-1.5-1.4-1.5-1.2-1.1-0.030.11-0.110.180.04-0.23-0.11-0.39-0.34-0.45-0.51-0.38-0.200.40.21.10.8-0.122-0.081-0.077-0.121-0.112-0.1170.190.080.11-0.39-0.07-0.11

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Chloride, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Inorganic Phosphorus and Urea/BUN at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Chloride, bicarbonate, glucose, potassium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus and urea/bun at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the Chloride, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Inorganic Phosphorus and Urea/Bun values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Chloride; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Chloride; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Chloride; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Chloride; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Chloride; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Chloride; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Chloride; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11Bicarbonate; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13,12Bicarbonate; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12,11Bicarbonate; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Bicarbonate; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Bicarbonate; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Bicarbonate; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Bicarbonate; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11,11Glucose; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Glucose; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Glucose; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Glucose; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Glucose; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Glucose; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Glucose; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11Potassium; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Potassium; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Potassium; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Potassium; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Potassium; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Potassium; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Potassium; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11,11Sodium; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Sodium; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Sodium; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Sodium; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Sodium; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Sodium; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Sodium; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11Inorganic phosphorus; Week 18; n=38,34,13,12Inorganic phosphorus; Week 24; n=35,33,12,11Inorganic phosphorus; Week 30; n=13,10,3,2Inorganic phosphorus; Week 36; n=10,7,2,2Inorganic phosphorus; Week 42; n=9,6,1,2Inorganic phosphorus; Week 48; n=6,6,0,2Inorganic phosphorus; PT Week 4;n=33,34,11,11Urea/BUN; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Urea/BUN; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Urea/BUN; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Urea/BUN; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Urea/BUN; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Urea/BUN; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Urea/BUN; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.921.91.31.31.30.5-0.3-10.4-0.9-0.7-1-0.7-0.28-0.330.03-0.38-0.280.250.24-0.19-0.13-0.030.24-0.10.1-0.160.70.41.10.40.4-0.2-0.1-0.161-0.139-0.156-0.121-0.08-0.167-0.084-0.19-0.220.690.650.340.670.35
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV10.70.3-0.10-10.2-1-1.2-2.20.1-0.2-1.3-0.5-0.130.27-0.26-0.37-0.12-0.30.18-0.24-0.12-0.23-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.130.1-0.1-1.4-0.7-0.5-1.20.1-0.13-0.13-0.118-0.167-0.108-0.108-0.003-0.23-0.55-0.160.040.50.4-0.19
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV0.5-0.2310.50-1.50-0.4-2-1.5-1-0.51-0.23-0.220.9-0.7-0.154.55-0.07-0.2-0.32-0.10.20.10.05-0.10.40.40-0.5-1.5-2.5-0.5-0.111-0.107-0.225-0.125-0.1-0.35-0.085-0.250.02-0.5-0.25-0.5-0.5-0.47
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV1.82.95.34.510NA0.6-1.2-1.8-1.3-2.5-4NA-0.9-0.06-0.23-0.13-0.10.4NA-0.12-0.41-0.34-0.10.15-0.1NA-0.250.71.51.323NA1.1-0.092-0.119-0.267-0.195-0.15NA0.009-0.49-0.43-0.5-0.150.5NA-0.62

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of estimated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault formula at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the estimated creatinine clearance values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Creatinine clearance; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Creatinine clearance; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Creatinine clearance; Week 30; n=13,10,3,2Creatinine clearance; Week 36; n=10,7,2,2Creatinine clearance; Week 42; n=9, 6,1,2Creatinine clearance; Week 48; n=6, 6,0,2Creatinine clearance; PT Week 4; n=33,34,11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.1-1.9-4.8-11-6.13.2-1.5
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1.1-1-10.4-8.1-13.3-15.8-1.3
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-4.3-6.171.5-1.5-4-5.3
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-2.5-4.1-3.7-19NA-2.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of direct bilirubin, total bilirubin and creatinine at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the direct bilirubin, total bilirubin and creatinine values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total Bilirubin; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Total Bilirubin; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Total Bilirubin; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Total Bilirubin; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Total Bilirubin; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Total Bilirubin; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13Direct Bilirubin; Week1; n=1, 1, 1, 1Direct Bilirubin; Week2; n=1, 1, 1, 1Direct Bilirubin; Week4; n=1, 1, 0, 0Direct Bilirubin; Week6; n=1, 1, 0, 0Creatinine; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Creatinine; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Creatinine; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Creatinine; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Creatinine; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Creatinine; Week12; n=38, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV6.95.82.21.51.40.40000-1.41-2.47-3.4-2.15-1.88-1.49
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV6.75.52.92.72.31.420200.23-2.78-1.33-0.34-0.51-1.99
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV4.26.52.52.11.81.2-11NANA-3.85-1.17-3.57-2.05-0.08-2.41
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV8.15.60.7-0.5-0.3-2.8-8-14NANA5.124.135.357.19.436.85

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiographic (ECG) Heart Rate Values at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

The ECG parameter heart rate was measured at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 12. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1 and 12

,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Week 1, n=41, 40, 15, 12Week 12, n=38, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV3.38.3
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV0.85.1
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV4.88.5
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV4.19.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Vital sign monitoring included heart rate, measured at the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24. Change from Baseline in heart rate is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment upto Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12

,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Heart Rate; Day2; n=41, 40, 17, 13Heart Rate; Week1; n=41, 39, 15, 13Heart Rate; Week2; n=41, 39, 14, 13Heart Rate; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Heart Rate; Week6; n=41, 39, 13, 13Heart Rate; Week8; n=41, 39, 13, 13Heart Rate; Week12; n=38, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV6.51.53.86.884.77
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV5.43.14.24.256.85.3
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV3.87.77.85.510.212.88.4
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV9.38.18.710.713.814.211

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the hematocrit values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
Hematocrit; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Hematocrit; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Hematocrit; Week 30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Hematocrit; Week 36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Hematocrit; Week 42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Hematocrit; Week 48; n=9, 6, 1, 2Hematocrit; PT Week 4; n=32, 34, 11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.083-0.0782-0.0713-0.0567-0.0623-0.0624-0.0293
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.0622-0.0635-0.0397-0.069-0.0802-0.0753-0.0135
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.0699-0.0823-0.1125-0.0895-0.111-0.1095-0.0354
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.0776-0.0808-0.0955-0.087-0.0535-0.047-0.0362

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the hematocrit values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
Hematocrit; Week1; n=38, 39, 14, 12Hematocrit; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 12Hematocrit; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Hematocrit; Week6; n=41, 38, 12, 13Hematocrit; Week8; n=39, 39, 13, 13Hematocrit; Week12; n=38, 36, 12, 12
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.0196-0.0539-0.0848-0.0859-0.0838-0.0843
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.0069-0.0465-0.0621-0.0685-0.0663-0.0589
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.0166-0.0335-0.0668-0.074-0.07-0.0688
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.0201-0.0609-0.0999-0.1203-0.1235-0.1318

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the hemoglobin values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Hemoglobin; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Hemoglobin; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12,11Hemoglobin; Week 30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Hemoglobin; Week 36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Hemoglobin; Week 42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Hemoglobin; Week 48; n=9, 6, 1, 2Hemoglobin; PT Week 4; n=32, 34, 11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-33.6-33.4-30.2-26.7-27.1-25.9-16.5
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-26.7-28-21-30-31.7-29.3-11.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-29-32.3-40-35-40-41-16.8
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-35-35.6-40-37-25-18-21.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the hemoglobin values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Hemoglobin; Week1; n=38, 39, 14, 12Hemoglobin; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 12Hemoglobin; Week4; n=41, 38, 14, 13Hemoglobin; Week6; n=41, 38, 12, 13Hemoglobin; Week8; n=39, 39, 13, 13Hemoglobin; Week12; n=38, 36, 12, 12
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-5.2-16.7-28.6-30.1-30.5-33
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-2.3-14.9-22.1-24.7-25.5-24.1
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-5.3-9.9-22.5-25.2-25.2-27.6
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-6.6-20.5-34.4-40.8-44.9-47.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Creatinine Clearance at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. It is estimated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation. Change from Baseline in the Creatinine Clearance values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionMilliliter per minute (mL/min) (Mean)
Creatinine Clearance; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Creatinine Clearance; Week2; n=41, 38,14,13Creatinine Clearance; Week4; n=41, 39,14,13Creatinine Clearance; Week6; n=41, 38,13,13Creatinine Clearance; Week8; n=40, 39,13,13Creatinine Clearance; Week12; n=38,35,12,13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.53.352.71.9-0.2
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-2.14.71.9-0.73.42.2
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV5.7-1.84.51.5-31.2
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-9.5-9-9.1-19.1-17.8-14.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of mean corpuscle volume at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the mean corpuscle volume values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 18;n=38,34,13,12Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 24;n=35,33,12,11Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 30; n=13,10,2,2Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 36; n=12,7,1,2Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 42;n=10,6,2,2Mean Corpuscle Volume ; Week 48;n=9,6,1,2Mean Corpuscle Volume; PT Week 4; n=32,34,11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV7.58.57.88.16.95.26.1
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV6.27.59.511.410.795.1
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV5.35.835.5455.3
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV8.57.611.521-15.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count and white blood cell count at the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT Week 4. Change from Baseline in the basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, total neutrophils platelet count and white blood cell count values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils; Week18; n=37, 33, 13, 12Basophils; Week24; n=34, 32, 12, 11Basophils; Week30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Basophils; Week36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Basophils; Week42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Basophils; Week48; n=7, 6, 1, 2Basophils; PT Week4; n=32, 34, 11, 11Eosinophils; Week18; n=37, 33, 13, 12Eosinophils; Week24; n=34, 32, 12, 11Eosinophils; Week30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Eosinophils; Week36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Eosinophils; Week42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Eosinophils; Week48; n=8, 6, 1, 2Eosinophils; PT Week4; n=32, 34, 11,11Lymphocytes; Week18; n=37, 33, 13,12Lymphocytes; Week24; n=34, 32, 12,11Lymphocytes; Week30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Lymphocytes; Week36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Lymphocytes; Week42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Lymphocytes; Week48; n=7, 6, 1, 2Lymphocytes; PT Week4; n=32, 34, 11,11Monocytes; Week18; n=37, 33, 13, 12Monocytes; Week24; n=34, 32, 12, 11Monocytes; Week30; n=13, 10, 2, 2Monocytes; Week36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Monocytes; Week42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Monocytes; Week48; n=7, 6, 1, 2Monocytes; PT Week4; n=32, 34, 11,11Total Neutrophils; Week18; n=37, 33,13,12Total Neutrophils; Week24; n=34, 32,12,11Total Neutrophils; Week30; n=13, 10,2,2Total Neutrophils; Week36; n=12, 7, 1,2Total Neutrophils; Week42; n=10, 6, 2,2Total Neutrophils; Week48; n=7, 6, 1, 2Total Neutrophils; PT Week4; n=32, 34,11,11Platelet Count; Week18; n=38, 34, 13,12Platelet Count; Week24; n=35, 33, 12,11Platelet Count; Week30; n=13, 10, 1, 2Platelet Count; Week36; n=12, 7, 1, 2Platelet Count; Week42; n=10, 6, 2, 2Platelet Count; Week48; n=9, 6, 1, 2Platelet Count; PT Week4; n=32, 34,11,11White Blood Cell count; Week18; n=37,33,13,12White Blood Cell count ; Week24; n=34,32,12,11White Blood Cell count ; Week30; n=13,10,2,2White Blood Cell count ; Week36; n=12,7,1,2White Blood Cell count ; Week42; n=10,6,2,2White Blood Cell count; Week48; n=7,6,1,2White Blood Cell count; PT Week4;n=32,34,11,11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.019-0.018-0.018-0.02-0.015-0.007-0.007-0.119-0.128-0.124-0.081-0.105-0.071-0.069-1.081-1.181-1.225-1.267-1.135-0.779-0.681-0.186-0.206-0.151-0.255-0.184-0.066-0.047-2.702-2.527-2.402-2.503-2.23-1.129-1.158-73.7-67.5-70-64.1-56.1-37.7-20.4-4.1-4.06-3.92-4.13-3.67-2.09-1.97
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.01-0.01-0.012-0.006-0.005-0.007-0.003-0.127-0.131-0.116-0.123-0.1-0.11-0.085-1.157-1.092-1.085-1.286-1.22-1.4-0.7-0.141-0.156-0.135-0.18-0.093-0.147-0.031-2.378-2.187-2.252-2.777-3.085-2.488-0.808-87.5-78.8-71.9-75.7-67.3-68.8-28.9-3.81-3.58-3.59-4.39-4.52-4.17-1.64
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.012-0.013-0.02-0.01-0.0150.005-0.003-0.068-0.041-0.04-0.05-0.04-0.05-0.018-0.973-1.057-1.845-1.92-1.93-2.2-0.737-0.143-0.121-0.060.015-0.01-0.085-0.053-1.463-1.3-2.085-1.63-1.815-1.445-0.671-52.1-51.9-36.5-34-22-14-12.9-2.65-2.52-4.05-3.55-3.8-3.8-1.45
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-0.014-0.013-0.02-0.0200.02-0.001-0.087-0.118-0.13-0.06-0.020.13-0.07-0.999-1.405-1.905-1.97-1.1250.09-0.756-0.088-0.151-0.4-0.2-0.0250.020.032-1.652-1.308-2.24-1.61-0.5650.02-0.744-55.7-60.3-112-115-11233-12.4-2.84-3-4.7-3.9-1.750.2-1.54

[back to top]

Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Week 4

Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK2336805 was obtained on Week 4+1 day at predose and at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours postdose. CL/F was calculated as dose divided by AUC(0-tau). (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 (24 h post dose)

InterventionLiter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV14.63
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV12.13

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Week 4

Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK2336805 was obtained on Week 4+1 day at predose and at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours postdose. Vz/F was calculated as dose divided by (AUC[0-tau] lambda z) where lambda z is the terminal phase rate constant. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 (24 h post dose)

InterventionLiter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV172.81
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV125.09

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) at Week 4

Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK2336805 was obtained on Week 4+1 day at predose and at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours postdose. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 (24 h post dose)

Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter(hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV2733.34
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV4948.23

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving eRVR

eRVR is defined as plasma HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV23
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV21
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV9
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV9

[back to top]

Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of GSK2336805 at Week 4

Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK2336805 was obtained on Week 4+1 day at predose and at 1, 2, 4, 7, 24 hours postdose. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 (24 h post dose)

Interventionhour (Median)
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV2
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV2

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of GSK2336805 at Week 4

Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK2336805 was obtained on Week 4+1 day at predose and at 1, 2, 4, 7, 24 hours post-dose. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Week 4 (24 h post dose)

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax, n=11, 10Ctau, n=11, 10
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV335.3531.37
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 and Genotype 4 HCV618.7549.31

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Albumin at the Indicated Time Points After Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin at the the Baseline, Day 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4. Change from Baseline in the albumin values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment after Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Week 4

,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Albumin; Week 18; n=38, 34, 13, 12Albumin; Week 24; n=35, 33, 12, 11Albumin; Week 30; n=13, 10, 3, 2Albumin; Week 36; n=10, 7, 2, 2Albumin; Week 42; n=9, 6, 1, 2Albumin; Week 48; n=6, 6, 0, 2Albumin; PT Week 4; n=33, 34, 11, 11
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-2.3-2.1-1.8-1.7-1.3-1.3-0.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-1.4-1.6-0.7-1.1-1.3-0.3-0.2
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-1-1.1-4.5-2-3-4-0.7
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-1.8-2.3-32-1NA0.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Albumin at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4. Change from Baseline in the albumin values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Albumin; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13Albumin; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13Albumin; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13Albumin; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13Albumin; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13Albumin; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.6-1.3-1.9-2.2-2.6-2.1
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV-0.3-1.5-1.5-1.5-1.7-1.3
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-1-0.2-1.2-2.1-1.5-1.6
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV-1.1-2-3-3.5-3.7-3.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at the Indicated Time Points up to Week 12

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT at the Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and PT FU Weeks 4 Change from Baseline in the ALP, ALT, AST, CK and GGT values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment until Week 12. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the last Pre-treatment value observed. (NCT01648140)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,,,
InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
ALP; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13ALP; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13ALP; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13ALP; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13ALP; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13ALP; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13ALT; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13ALT; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13ALT; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13ALT; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13ALT; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13ALT; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13AST; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13AST; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13AST; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13AST; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13AST; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13AST; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13CK; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13CK; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13CK; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13CK; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13CK; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13CK; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13GGT; Week1; n=40, 39, 15, 13GGT; Week2; n=41, 38, 14, 13GGT; Week4; n=41, 39, 14, 13GGT; Week6; n=41, 38, 13, 13GGT; Week8; n=40, 39, 13, 13GGT; Week12; n=37, 35, 12, 13
GSK2336805 40 mg, Genotype 1 HCV04.68.69.16.96.7-26.8-28.2-32.5-36-36.8-38.9-12.3-10-12.8-13.8-13.1-14.418.2-0.74.5-26-21.3-36.3-3.7-11.7-24.5-28.1-32.1-29.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 1 HCV1.53.87.17.26.56.4-24.4-24.9-25.3-30.3-25.4-23.5-15.2-11.6-10.6-13.8-7.6-6.5-10.9-22.6-32.156.1-33.2-33.9-2-17.1-25.5-30.5-27.2-20.7
GSK2336805 60 mg, Genotype 4 HCV-0.23.87.26.65.67.3-25.6-26.8-33-38.4-39.5-36.8-13.9-10.2-15.8-19.5-18.6-17.3-43.5-28.5-47.7-64.5-66.8-48.5-6.4-7.2-16.2-23.8-28.5-30
Telaprevir, Genotype 1 HCV3.99.411.716.615.511.7-30.7-35.4-40.4-40.8-39.9-43.7-18.1-18.4-20.9-21.6-21.8-25.7-3.3-9.6-14.4-21.5-30.3-20.9-10.3-19.9-27.7-30.5-30.5-33.6

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Duration of Treatment After Achieving RVR on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of duration of treatment after achieving RVR (>18 weeks versus <=18 weeks) on SVR. RVR was defined as HCV RNA <=25 IU/mL at Week 4 using CAP/CTM test. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, Week 4, EOT, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin1.04

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Duration of Treatment After Achieving cEVR on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of duration of treatment after achieving cEVR (>11 weeks versus <=11 weeks) on SVR. cEVR was defined as HCV RNA <=25 IU/mL at Week 12, but not at Week 4 using CAP/CTM test. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, EOT, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin2.77

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Cumulative Doses of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of cumulative doses of pegylated interferon alfa-2a on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after EOT (up to 96 weeks), where EOT = up to 72 weeks

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.99

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Body Weight on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of body weight on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin1.01

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Baseline Viral Load Count on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of baseline viral load count (>800000 IU/mL versus <=800000 IU/mL) on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin1.07

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Baseline Level of Fibrosis (kPa) on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of baseline level of fibrosis on SVR. Level of fibrosis was measured in terms of kilopascals (kPa) using elastography. kPa score was categorized in 4 groups: 0 to 6.0; 6.1 to 9.9; 10.0 to 14.5; and 14.6 and above. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.53

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Baseline Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Level on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of baseline ALT level (>40 international units per liter [IU/L] versus <=40 IU/L) on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.12

[back to top]

Odds Ratio (OR) for Impact of Age on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of age (greater than [>] 42 years versus <=42 years) on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.21

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Cumulative Doses of Ribavirin on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of cumulative doses of ribavirin on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after EOT (up to 96 weeks), where EOT = up to 72 weeks

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.99

[back to top]

PPV of Complete Early Viral Response (cEVR) on SVR

cEVR was defined as HCV RNA <=25 IU/mL at Week 12, but not at Week 4 using CAP/CTM test. The percentage of participants with probability that the participant who develops cEVR would achieve SVR was termed as PPV of cEVR on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after EOT (up to 96 weeks), where EOT = up to 72 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin60.3

[back to top]

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Rapid Viral Response (RVR) on SVR

RVR was defined as HCV RNA less than or equal to (<=) 25 IU/mL at Week 4 using CAP/CTM test. The percentage of participants with probability that the participant who develops RVR would achieve SVR was termed as PPV of RVR on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after EOT (up to 96 weeks), where EOT = up to 72 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin93.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response (SVR)

SVR was defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) level undetectable (less than [<] 15 international units per milliliter [IU/mL]) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using the COBAS AmpliPrep [CAP]/ COBAS TaqMan [CTM] test). Percentage of participants achieving SVR was reported. (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT) (up to 96 weeks), where EOT = up to 72 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin79.1

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Overall Duration of Treatment on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of overall duration of treatment on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, EOT, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin1.05

[back to top]

OR for Impact of Gender on SVR

The viral response development was assessed using univariate analysis with logistic regression model to calculate OR for impact of gender (male versus female) on SVR. SVR was defined as HCV RNA level undetectable (<15 IU/mL) 24 weeks after completion of the actual treatment period (measured using CAP/ CTM test). (NCT01659567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks (assessed at Baseline, 24 weeks after EOT [up to 96 weeks], where EOT = up to 72 weeks)

Interventionodds ratio (Number)
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin0.48

[back to top]

Efficacy: Change From Baseline in Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Titer at Week 24, 72 and 96

Change is calculated by HBsAg titer at baseline - HBsAg titer at week of assessments. (NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, 72 and 96

Interventioninternational units per millilitre (Mean)
Baseline (n= 56)Change at Week 24 (n= 56)Change at Week 72 (n= 55)Change at Week 96 (n= 55)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a0-546.32-815.69-728.16

[back to top]

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Decrease >/=1 log10 IU/ml From Baseline to Week 48

(NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a13.95

[back to top]

Efficacy: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Titer at End of the Combination Treatment (Week 48)

(NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a59.13

[back to top]

Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. (NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a92.75

[back to top]

Efficacy: Number of Participants With Serum HBsAg Loss at Week 12 That Persisted up to Week 96

HBsAg loss is defined as HBsAg less than or equal to (NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 96

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a1

[back to top]

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Decrease >/= 50% From Baseline at End of the Combination Treatment (Week 48)

Participants who stopped pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment during the add-on phase due to serum HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion were considered as responders. (NCT01706575)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (Peginterferon) Alfa-2a67.44

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from randomization to death (event), or censored at last date known alive. (NCT01708941)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then every 12 months for up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Higher Dose Ipilimumab (With or Without HDI)20.1
Lower Dose Ipilimumab (With or Without HDI)23.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from randomization to death (event), or censored at last date known alive (NCT01708941)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then every 12 months for up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ipilimumab + HDI20.1
Ipilimumab Alone24.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to any documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (event), or censored at last date known alive. (NCT01708941)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then every 12 months for up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Higher Dose Ipilimumab (With or Without HDI)6.5
Lower Dose Ipilimumab (With or Without HDI)3.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to any documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (event), or censored at last date known alive. (NCT01708941)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then every 12 months for up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ipilimumab + HDI7.5
Ipilimumab Alone4.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Undetectable HCV RNA During Treatment by Time Point

HCV RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0® assay on blood samples drawn from each participant at Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, and at end of treatment. The assay has a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL. Undetectable HCV RNA was defined as HCV RNA < 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: From Treatment Week (TW) 2 through end of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=29, 25, 29)Week 4 (n=28, 26, 29)Week 12 (n=28, 26, 28)End of All Therapy (n=26, 25, 26)
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV55.289.7100.0100.0
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV34.582.196.492.3
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV32.076.992.392.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR4

HCV RNA was measured using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0® assay, which has a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL. SVR4 was defined as HCV RNA <25 IU/mL (either target detected, unquantifiable or target not detected) 4 weeks after the end of all study therapy. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after end of treatment (up to 28 weeks total)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV76.9
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV88.0
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV92.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Developing Post-baseline Antiviral Resistance to Grazoprevir Among Participants Not Achieving SVR24 Response

Post-baseline resistance associated variants (RAV) analysis was conducted by comparing the amino acid sequences at virologic failure time points to those at baseline (BL): Day 1, pre-dose. A post-BL variant was defined as an amino acid substitution within HCV NS3/4A that was present after the first dose at virologic failure and follow-up visits but not at BL. Post-BL variant analysis was conducted for participants who did not achieve SVR24 who had sequence data available. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to Follow-up Week 24 (up to 48 weeks total)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV9
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV5
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Treatment Due to AEs During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol -specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol -specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV1
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV1
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR12)

Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) was measured using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0® assay, which has a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL. SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA <25 IU/mL (either target detected, unquantifiable or target not detected) 12 weeks after the end of all study therapy. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after end of treatment (up to 36 weeks total)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV54.2
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV84.0
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV88.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HCV RNA <25 IU/mL During Treatment by Time Point

HCV RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0® assay on blood samples drawn from each participant at Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, and at end of treatment. The assay has a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: From TW 2 through end of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=29, 25, 29)Week 4 (n=28, 26, 29)Week 12 (n=28, 26, 28)End of all Therapy (n=26, 25, 26)
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV96.6100.0100.0100.0
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV86.296.496.492.3
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV88.0100.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol -specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol -specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: 14 days following last dose of study drug (up to 26 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV28
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV28
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV28

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving SVR24

HCV RNA was measured using the Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ HCV Test, v2.0® assay, which has a lower limit of quantification of 25 IU/mL and a limit of detection of 9.3 IU/mL. SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA <25 IU/mL (either target detected, unquantifiable or target not detected) 24 weeks after the end of all study therapy. (NCT01710501)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after end of treatment (up to 48 weeks total)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grazoprevir 25 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV54.2
Grazoprevir 50 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV84.0
Grazoprevir 100 mg + PEG-IFN + RBV84.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Dose Reductions, And Death

AE=any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Treatment-related SAE=possibly, probably, or certainly related to study drug. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to end of follow-up (maximum of 60 weeks for Cohort A and 72 weeks for Cohort B)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AEs on treatmentSAEsDeathAE leading to discontinuationDose reduction - LambdaDose reduction - RBV
Cohort A1000100
Cohort B3840312

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Flu-Like Symptoms and Musculoskeletal Symptoms On-Treatment

Flu-like symptoms were defined as pyrexia or chills or pain. Musculoskeletal symptoms were defined as arthralgia or myalgia or back pain. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: After day 1 to end of treatment (Up to 85 Days for Cohort A, Up to 168 Days for Cohort B)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Flu-like symptomsMusculoskeletal symptoms
Cohort A8.30
Cohort B12.815.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) at Follow-Up Week 12

SVR12 was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up Week 12. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A91.7
Cohort B89.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Early Virologic Response (cEVR)

cEVR was defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at Week 12. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: Treatment Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A91.7
Cohort B92.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With End of the Treatment Response (EOTR)

EOTR was defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at end of treatment. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: End of the treatment (Week 12 for Cohort A, Week 24 for Cohort B)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A100
Cohort B100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Grade 3 to 4 Laboratory Abnormalities

Laboratory abnormalities were determined and graded using the Division of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 1.0. International Normalized Ratio (INR): >2.0*Upper limit of normal (ULN); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) : >5*ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >5*ULN; Prothrombin Time (PT): >1.50*ULN; Bilirubin (Total): >2.5*ULN; Triglycerides (fasting): >750 mg/dL. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: After day 1 to to end of treatment (Up to 85 Days for Cohort A, Up to 168 Days for Cohort B)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
INRALTASTPTBilirubinTriglycerides
Cohort A020020
Cohort B112171

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

RVR was defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target not detected at Week 4. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: Treatment Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A91.7
Cohort B76.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Cytopenic Abnormalities On-Treatment

Cytopenic abnormalities were defined as anemia: Hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL, and/or neutropenia: absolute neutrophils and bands (ANC) <750 mm^3, and/or thrombocytopenia: platelets <50,000 mm^3. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: After day 1 to end of treatment (Up to 85 Days for Cohort A, Up to 168 Days for Cohort B)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A0
Cohort B0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Follow-Up Week 24 (SVR24)

SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation, target detected or target not detected at follow-up week 24. (NCT01741545)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A66.7
Cohort B30.8

[back to top]

Cmax of Interferon Beta-1a

Primary outcome measure for pharmacokinetics analysis Blood samples were taken before the injection, then after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. (NCT01766024)
Timeframe: 0 to 48 hours post-dose

Interventionpg/ml (Median)
BCD-033104.9
Rebif102.4

[back to top]

AUC(0-168) and AUC(0-∞) of Neopterin and MxA Protein

Primary outcome measure for pharmacodynamics analysis. Blood samples were taken before the injection, then after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 hours. (NCT01766024)
Timeframe: 0 to 168 hours post-dose

,
Intervention(ng/ml)*h (Median)
neopterinMxA protein
BCD-033552.72444.2
Rebif537.62131.2

[back to top]

Area Under Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a From the Moment of Drug Administration Until 48 Hours and to Infinity(AUC(0-48) and AUC(0-∞) Respectively)

Primary outcome measure for pharmacokinetics analysis. Blood samples were taken before the injection, then after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. (NCT01766024)
Timeframe: 0 to 48 hours post-dose

Intervention(pg/ml)•h (Median)
BCD-0336318.3
Rebif6807.9

[back to top]

Normalization of Alanine Transferase Test

Liver function test,showing resolution of the inflammation of liver parenchyma (NCT01770483)
Timeframe: 48week

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Control Group11
Study Group11

[back to top]

Sustained Viral Response,

Sustained viral response ,is negative Hepatitis C Virus(PCR)RNA test six months after end of treatment. (NCT01770483)
Timeframe: 48 WEEK

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Control Group13
Study Group11

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment

Virologic failure during treatment was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment or confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment (12 weeks for 3-DAA/RBV and 24 or 48 weeks for TPV/RBV)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
3-DAA/RBV0
TPV/RBV19.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse After Treatment

Participants who completed treatment with plasma HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Between end of treatment (Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV) and Post-treatment (up to Week 12 Post-treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
3-DAA/RBV0
TPV/RBV6.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment

The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
3-DAA/RBV100.0
TPV/RBV66.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment

The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
3-DAA/RBV99.0
TPV/RBV66.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)

The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into an MCS score (from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being). (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
3-DAA/RBV-1.3
TPV/RBV-9.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)

The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into a PCS score (range = 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being). (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
3-DAA/RBV0.4
TPV/RBV-7.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in SF-36V2 Physical Component Summary (PCS)

SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring HRQoL covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perception. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both PCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL). (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a0.5
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a-5.5
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b0.4
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b2.2
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b-5.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment

"Participants in Arms A, C or D demonstrating any of the following were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy:~Confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements of >1 log10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point during treatment~Failure to achieve HCV RNA < LLOQ by Week 6 or~Confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements ≥ LLOQ) at any point after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment after HCV RNA < LLOQ.~Participants in Arms B and E followed virologic stopping criteria described in the TPV Summary of Product Characteristics; they were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy as follows:~HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 4 to Week 12, discontinue TPV and pegIFN and RBV~HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 12, discontinue pegIFN and RBV~Confirmed HCV RNA > lower limit of detection (LLOD) at Week 24, discontinue pegIFN and RBV~Confirmed HCV RNA > LLOD at Week 36, discontinue pegIFN and RBV." (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and 24 weeks or 48 weeks for Arms B and E

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a2.9
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a5.9
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b0
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b1.2
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b12.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to the Final Treatment Visit in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Status Survey (SF-36V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS)

SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both MCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL). (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a-4.2
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a-5.8
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b-0.3
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b-0.1
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b-6.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Post-treatment Relapse

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 24 weeks post treatment among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA less than the LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: Within 24 weeks post treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a0
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a0
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b1.2
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b0
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b6.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment (SVR12) - Primary Efficacy Analyses

The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a97.1
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a82.4
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b98.8
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b97.6
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b78.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment (SVR24)

The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a95.7
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a82.4
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b97.6
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b97.6
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b78.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With SVR12 - Secondary Efficacy Analyses

The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a97.1
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a82.4
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b98.8
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b97.6
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b78.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; in the view of the Investigators, placed the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); however, this did not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigators, could have jeopardized the participant or may have required intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. (NCT01864148)
Timeframe: Up to 84 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventModerate or severe eventSevere eventBIIB033/placebo-related eventAvonex-related eventSerious eventBIIB033/placebo-related serious eventAvonex-related serious eventEvent leading to discontinuation of treatmentEvent leading to withdrawal from study
BIIB033 Total275202215119051632021
BIIB033, 10 mg/kg845961558110034
BIIB033, 100 mg/kg735871650165187
BIIB033, 3 mg/kg3926282840022
BIIB033, 30 mg/kg795961254201278
Placebo79597851131144

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: BIIB033 Plasma Concentrations up to Week 84

(NCT01864148)
Timeframe: Up to 84 weeks

,,,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Baseline, predose; n=44, 95, 92, 92Baseline, postdose; n=44, 95, 91, 92Week 4, predose; n=45, 93, 91, 88Week 4, postdose; n=45, 94, 89, 85Week 8, predose; n=45, 95, 89, 85Week 8, postdose; n=44, 94, 88, 79Week 16, predose; n=43, 94, 86, 79Week 16, postdose; n=41, 93, 85, 78Week 24, predose; n=42, 93, 85, 74Week 24, postdose; n=42, 92, 82, 76Week 36, predose; n=41, 88, 79, 74Week 36, postdose; n=42, 88, 77, 73Week 48, predose; n=39, 85, 74, 70Week 48, postdose; n=42, 85, 75, 72Week 60, predose; n=41, 84, 70, 68Week 60, postdose; n=42, 84, 71, 71Week 72, predose; n=41, 85, 72, 68Week 72, postdose; n=38, 84, 69, 68Week 84; n=40, 81, 69, 69
BIIB033, 10 mg/kg0.01244.7646.28279.6765.48294.4471.80309.3877.88318.0185.05339.1780.28334.1281.77335.1078.94313.1312.77
BIIB033, 100 mg/kg0.422298.20457.962763.26603.112751.25695.112921.09699.632870.29725.223048.66806.703167.07694.123330.70819.393145.82127.69
BIIB033, 3 mg/kg0.0066.7010.82123.9623.5586.2919.9685.9536.41144.1225.3394.6220.7890.0721.2993.1119.5382.962.44
BIIB033, 30 mg/kg7.79688.47138.54784.08195.29861.60231.94881.45230.46940.29238.48197.86272.88955.25243.18939.17215.09868.3946.16

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Confirmed as Worsening Responders for Primary Multicomponent Endpoint

Estimated proportion of participants experiencing confirmed clinical worsening in 1 or more components of the multicomponent endpoint (EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT, or PASAT-3) over 72 weeks, defined as: a ≥1.0 point increase in EDSS from a baseline score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5 point increase from a baseline score equal to 6.0 (increase sustained for 3 months or greater); a ≥15%worsening from baseline in time to complete T25FW test (worsening sustained for 3 months or greater), where the time is the average of 2 trials at the same visit; a ≥15% worsening from baseline in time to complete 9HPT by either hand (worsening sustained for 3 months or greater for the same hand), where the time is the average of 2 trials for each hand at the same visit; a ≥15% worsening from baseline in PASAT-3 score (worsening sustained for 3 months or greater). Estimated proportion of responders is based on logistic regression adjusted for MS type, region and baseline component assessments. (NCT01864148)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Placebo0.403
BIIB033, 3 mg/kg0.304
BIIB033, 10 mg/kg0.509
BIIB033, 30 mg/kg0.489
BIIB033, 100 mg/kg0.369

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Confirmed as Improvement Responders for Primary Multicomponent Endpoint

Estimated proportion of participants experiencing confirmed improvement in any 1 or more of the following components: a ≥1 point decrease in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from a baseline score of <=6.0 (decrease sustained for ≥3 months); a ≥15% improvement from baseline in time to complete 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) by either hand (improvement sustained for ≥3 months for the same hand), where the time is the average time of 2 trials per hand at the same visit; a ≥15% improvement from baseline in time to complete Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test (improvement sustained for ≥3 months), where the time is the average time of 2 trials at the same visit; or a ≥15% improvement from baseline 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) score (improvement sustained for 3 months or greater). Estimated proportion of responders is based on logistic regression adjusted for multiple sclerosis (MS) type, region and baseline component assessments. (NCT01864148)
Timeframe: 72 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Placebo0.516
BIIB033, 3 mg/kg0.511
BIIB033, 10 mg/kg0.656
BIIB033, 30 mg/kg0.688
BIIB033, 100 mg/kg0.412

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Grade 3/4 Lab Abnormalities

Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent lab abnormalities that occurred in >=5% of subjects in either cohort are reported. The analysis included all treated subjects up to the end of the treatment period (Day 1 to week 24, or Day 1 to week 48 for subjects requiring those visits). Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. AST = Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT = Alanine aminotransferase. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: After Day 1 to end of treatment; up to Weeks 24 or 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Total BilirubinASTALT
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-326102
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4631310

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR) and Extended Rapid Virologic Response (eRVR)

RVR is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ target not detected at Week 4 and eRVR defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ target not detected at Weeks 4 and 12 (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Treatment weeks 4 and 12

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RVReRVR
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-38280
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4149138

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-treatment IFN-associated Flu-like or Musculoskeletal Symptoms

All treated participants were monitored for IFN-associated Flu-like and Musculoskeletal symptoms. Flu-like symptoms were defined as pyrexia, chills, or pain. Musculoskeletal symptoms were defined as arthralgia, myalgia, or back pain. Subjects were monitored throughout the treatment period during the treatment period (After day 1 up to week 24, or After day 1 up to week 48 for subjects requiring those visits). (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: After Day 1 to end of treatment; up to Weeks 24 or 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Musculoskeletal symptomsFlu-like symptoms
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-366
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-42119

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died or Experienced Severe Adverse Events (SAEs), Dose Reductions of Lambda or Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that. at any dose, results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: After Day 1 to end of treatment; up to Weeks 24 or 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathsSAEsLambda Dose ReductionDiscontinuation due to AEs
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-30644
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-43121913

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Cytopenic Abnormalities

All treated participants were monitored for treatment emergent cytopenic abnormalities (anemia as defined by hemoglobin (Hb) < 10 g/dL, and/or neutropenia as defined by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 750 mm3 and/or thrombocytopenia as defined by platelets < 50,000/mm3) during the treatment period (Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 20, and 24, and at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 for subjects requiring those visits). (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: After Day 1 to end of treatment; up to Weeks 24 or 48

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-34
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-415

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12)

SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA less than lower limit of quantification (< LLOQ) (25 IU/mL; target detected or not detected) at follow-up week 12. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Follow-up week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-388
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4149

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for percent change in Total Lymphocyte Count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean percent change in each arm is presented for all evaluable participants. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-3-15.33
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4-22.95

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Absolute CD4 T Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for percent change in CD4 T Lymphocyte count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean percent change in each arm is presented for all evaluable participants. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-3-4.0
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4-13.4

[back to top]

Mean Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for change in Total Lymphocyte Count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean change in each arm for all evaluable participants is reported in Cells/µL. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

InterventionCells/µL (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-3-0.38
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4-0.50

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for percent change in Platelet Count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean percent change in each arm is presented for all evaluable participants. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-316.9
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-420.1

[back to top]

Mean Change in Absolute CD4 T Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for change in Absolute CD4 T Lymphocyte count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean change in each arm for all evaluable participants is reported in Cells/µL. (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

InterventionCells/uL (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-3-42.4
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-4-104.9

[back to top]

Mean Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to End of Treatment

All treated participants were monitored for change in Platelet Count from Baseline to the end of the treatment period. The mean change in each arm for all evaluable participants (units of measurement = x10^9 cells/L). (NCT01866930)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment; up to week 24 or week 48

Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
Cohort A: HCV GT-2 or GT-332.7
Cohort B: HCV GT-1 or GT-433.3

[back to top]

Frequency of Relapses in Patients Treated for up to 24 Months

Frequency of relapses assessed by the annualized relapse rate (ARR). The ARR is defined as the average number of confirmed relapses per year (total number of confirmed relapses divided by the total days in the study multiplied by 365.25). (NCT01892722)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionConfirmed relapse per year (Mean)
Fingolimod0.122
Interferon Beta-1a0.675

[back to top]

Proportions of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01925183)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) to Follow-up week 12 (FU12)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse events (AEs)Serious adverse events (SAEs)
28 Weeks of Treatment Duration30
48 Weeks of Treatment Duration31

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12)

Defined as HCV-RNA negativity by a sensitive assay (NCT01925183)
Timeframe: Follow-up week 12 (FU12)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
28 Weeks of Treatment Duration3
48 Weeks of Treatment Duration2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Copies of HIV DNA Per CD4+ T Cell at Week 24

Difference in copies of HIV DNA per CD4+ T cell between baseline and week 24, assessed by Alu-HIVgag polymerase chain reaction (NCT01935089)
Timeframe: Week 3 and 24

InterventionHIV DNA copies per CD4+ T cell (Median)
BaselineWeek 24
Interferon Alpha11398

[back to top]

Summary of Average Duration of FLS in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment

Duration of FLS for a treatment was defined as the sum of hours from the time of treatment to 48 hours with an FLS-S score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. If an FLS is > 0 at an evaluation time, 6 hours were counted as the duration assuming the event started from previous evaluation time. Average duration of FLS for the first 8 weeks was defined as the mean duration from Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; F8W=first 8 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Average duration in 4WRI; n=88, 86, 174Average duration in F8W; n=91, 83, 174Change from 4WRI to F8W; n=85, 78, 163
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy16182.1
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen12.8183.8
Overall Population13.75183

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any FLS in the 4-Week Run-In Period, During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment, and During 48 Weeks of Treatment

Any FLS is defined as an FLS-S total score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. 4WRI=4-week run-in; F8W=first 8 weeks; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
4WRIF8W48W
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy889195
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen91.588.394.7
Overall Population89.789.794.8

[back to top]

Summary of Average Duration of FLS in the 48 Weeks of Treatment

Duration of FLS for a treatment was defined as the sum of hours from the time of treatment to 48 hours with a FLS-S score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. If a FLS is > 0 at an evaluation time, 6 hours were counted as the duration assuming the event started from previous evaluation time. Average duration of FLS for the first 8 weeks was defined as the mean duration from Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Average duration in 4WRI; n=88, 86, 174Average duration in 48W; n=95, 89, 184Change from 4WRI to 48W; n=86, 82, 168
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy1616.752.82
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen12.816.962
Overall Population13.7516.962.16

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Effectiveness Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to Week 4 using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for effectiveness (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. This secondary endpoint was targeted for Week 4 only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Effectiveness at 4WRI; n=100, 94Change at Week 4; n=95, 90
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy75.160.979
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen72.5-6.356

[back to top]

Summary of FLS-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Effectiveness of FLS Treatment

Participants reported the effectiveness of their FLS management regimen on a 100-mm VAS between not effective (0) and very effective (100). 4WRI=4-week run-in period; F8W=first 8 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Effectiveness in 4WRI; n=91, 86, 177Effectiveness in F8W; n=96, 91, 187Change from 4WRI to F8W; n=87, 83, 170
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy64.569.6956.525
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen66.39874.2535.694
Overall Population65.42271.9136.119

[back to top]

Summary of FLS-VAS During the First 8 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Satisfaction With FLS Treatment

Participants reported their satisfaction with the effectiveness of their FLS management regimen on a 100-mm VAS between not satisfied (0) and very satisfied (100). 4WRI=4-week run-in period; F8W=first 8 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Satisfaction in 4WRI; n=91, 86, 177Satisfaction in F8W; n=96, 91, 187Change from 4WRI to F8W; n=87, 83, 170
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy68.65471.1533.715
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen72.77874.6840.759
Overall Population70.65872.8712.272

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Global Satisfaction Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to Week 4 using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for global satisfaction (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. This secondary endpoint was targeted for Week 4 only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Global Satisfaction at 4WRI; n=100, 94Change at Week 4; n=95, 90
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy75.868.663
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen76.1174.811

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Side Effects Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to Week 4 using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for side effects (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. This secondary endpoint was targeted for Week 4 only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Side Effects at 4WRI; n=100, 94Change at Week 4; n=95, 90
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy83.788.579
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen86.6493.411

[back to top]

Summary of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; in the view of the Investigator, placed the subject at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize the subject or could require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. ISR=injection site reactions. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventModerate or severe eventSevere eventRelated eventSerious eventDiscontinuations due to AEsTreatment discontinuation due to FLS eventTreatment discontinuation due to ISR eventsStudy discontinuation due to an event
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy93547804143513
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen906012716132313

[back to top]

Shift in Percentage of Participants With Any FLS From 4-Week Run-In Period to the First 8 Weeks

Any FLS is defined as an FLS-S total score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. Pre-dose data not were used. Data up to 48-hours after dosing were used. Total score was imputed as the highest score after dose. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; F8W=first 8 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
With FLS in 4WRI / With FLS during F8WWith FLS in 4WRI / Without FLS during F8WWithout FLS in 4WRI / With FLS during F8WWithout FLS in 4WRI / Without FLS during F8W
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy85.003.006.006.00
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen82.988.515.323.19
Overall Population84.025.675.674.64

[back to top]

Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Days Missed in 2 Weeks From MS Symptoms: Overall Population

Categorical questions in the Absenteeism Questionnaire asked participants to report the number of usual work days per week, the number of days missed in 2 weeks from MS symptoms, and the number of days missed in 2 weeks from MS treatment. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Week -4 (screening), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Early Termination

Interventiondays (Mean)
Days in 4WRI; n=123Change at Week 12; n=106Change at Week 24; n=99Change at Week 36; n=96Change at Week 48; n =95Change at Early Termination; n=15
Overall Population0.0160.0570.06100.1370

[back to top]

Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Days Missed in 2 Weeks From MS Treatment: Overall Population

Categorical questions in the Absenteeism Questionnaire asked participants to report the number of usual work days per week, the number of days missed in 2 weeks from MS symptoms, and the number of days missed in 2 weeks from MS treatment. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Week -4 (screening), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Early Termination

Interventiondays (Mean)
Days in 4WRI; n=123Change at Week 12; n=106Change at Week 24; n=99Change at Week 36; n=96Change at Week 48; n =95Change at Early Termination; n=15
Overall Population0.0160.0190.02-0.0210.1260.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Screening at Each Visit in Absenteeism Questionnaire, Usual Work Days Per Week: Overall Population

Categorical questions in the Absenteeism Questionnaire asked participants to report the number of usual work days per week, the number of days missed in 2 weeks from multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, and the number of days missed in 2 weeks from MS treatment. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Week -4 (screening), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Early Termination

Interventiondays (Mean)
Days in 4WRI; n=123Change at Week 12; n=106Change at Week 24; n=99Change at Week 36; n=96Change at Week 48; n=95Change at Early Termination; n=15
Overall Population4.691-0.019-0.081-0.0520.0320.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Convenience Scale Factor: Overall Population

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to each visit using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for convenience (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (or Early Termination)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Convenience at 4WRI; n=194Change at Week 4; n=185Change at Week 12; n=175Change at Week 24; n=167Change at Week 36; n =162Change at Week 48; n=153Change at Early Termination; n=26
Overall Population66.66518.70318.1218.41918.70419.5887.808

[back to top]

Summary of FLS-VAS During the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Effectiveness of FLS Treatment

Participants reported the effectiveness of their FLS management regimen on a 100-mm VAS between not effective (0) and very effective (100). 4WRI=4-week run-in period; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Effectiveness in 4WRI; n=91, 86, 177Effectiveness in 48W; n=99, 94, 193Change from 4WRI to 48W; n=90, 86, 176
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy64.570.5476.803
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen66.39875.4168.042
Overall Population65.42272.9187.408

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Effectiveness Scale Factor: Overall Population

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to each visit using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for effectiveness (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (or Early Termination)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Effectiveness at 4WRI; n=194Change at Week 4; n=185Change at Week 12; n=175Change at Week 24; n=167Change at Week 36; n =162Change at Week 48; n=153Change at Early Termination; n=26
Overall Population73.871-2.589-1.2740.3411.8642.863-17.308

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Visit (Day 1) to Week 48 in Walking Disability Status as Measured by Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS): Overall Population

Subjects rated their perceived walking disability on a scale of 0 to 8 using the PDDS, with higher scores indicating more severe disability. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline, pre-dose), Week 12, Week 48, Early Termination

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; n=194Change at Week 12; n=174Change at Week 48; n=153Change Early Termination; n=26
Overall Population0.830.0290.150.346

[back to top]

Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) Testing

The number of participants who tested positive for IFN β-1a Nabs. Value was coded as 'positive' if observed value > 0 or coded as 'negative' if observed value < 0. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48 or early withdrawal (EW)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Positive; n=22Baseline: Negative; n=22Any post-baseline visit: Positive; n=35Any post-baseline visit: Negative; n=35Week 12: Positive; n=26Week 12: Negative; n=26Week 24: Positive; n=22Week 24: Negative; n=22Week 36: Positive; n=18Week 36: Negative; n=18Week 48/EW: Positive; n=25Week 48/EW: Negative; n=25Negative at BL with ≥ 1 positive post-BL; n=7
Overall Population14817201511111111712131

[back to top]

Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Antibody Screening

The number of participants who tested positive for IFN β-1a binding antibodies (BAbs). Value was coded as 'positive' if observed value > 0 or coded as 'negative' if observed value < 0. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL; Day 1), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48 or early withdrawal (EW)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Positive; n=199Baseline: Negative; n=199Any post-baseline visit: Positive; n=198Any post-baseline visit: Negative; n=198Week 12: Positive; n=183Week 12: Negative; n=183Week 24: Positive; n=171Week 24: Negative; n=171Week 36: Positive; n=167Week 36: Negative; n=167Week 48/EW: Positive; n=193Week 48/EW: Negative; n=193Negative at BL with ≥ 1 positive post-BL; n=174
Overall Population22177351782615722149181492516813

[back to top]

Antibody Data in the Overall Population: IFN β-1a Anti-Pegylated (PEG) Antibody Testing

The number of participants who tested positive or negative for IFN β-1a anti-PEG antibodies. Value was coded as 'positive' if observed value > 0 or coded as 'negative' if observed value < 0. This secondary endpoint was targeted to analyze the Overall Population only. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL; Day 1), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48 or early withdrawal (EW)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Positive; n=201Baseline: Negative; n=201Any post-baseline visit: Positive; n=198Any post-baseline visit: Negative; n=198Week 12: Positive; n=182Week 12: Negative; n=182Week 24: Positive; n=173Week 24: Negative; n=173Week 36: Positive; n=168Week 36: Negative; n=168Week 48/EW: Positive; n=193Week 48/EW: Negative; n=193Negative at BL with ≥ 1 positive post-BL; n=192
Overall Population7194819661763170116731904

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing New or Increased FLS During the First 8 Weeks: Overall Population

The total Flu-like Symptoms Score (FLS-S) is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. New or increased FLS is defined as an FLS overall score of 2 points or greater over Screening. Pre-dose data were not used; up to 48-hour data after dosing were used. Overall score was imputed as the average score after dose. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: during the first 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall Population10.3

[back to top]

Summary of Average Duration of FLS Within the Last 4 Weeks of the BIIB017 Treatment Period Compared With the Duration of FLS in the 4-Week Run-In Period

Average duration of FLS for the last 4 weeks (L4W) is defined as the mean duration of last 4 weeks. Duration of FLS for a treatment is defined as the sum of hours from the treatment to 48 hours with a FLS-S score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. If a FLS is > 0 at an evaluation time, 6 hours were counted as the duration assuming the event started from previous evaluation time. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: Weeks -4 to -1 (Screening), Weeks 45-48 (last 4 weeks of study)

,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Average duration in 4WRI; n=88, 86, 174Average duration in L4W; n=87, 83, 170Change from 4WRI to L4W; n=80, 77, 157
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy16.06718.0572.612
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen14.91515.8920.943
Overall Population15.497171.793

[back to top]

Shift in Percentage of Participants With Any FLS From 4-Week Run-In Period to 48 Weeks

Any FLS is defined as an FLS-S total score > 0. The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. Pre-dose data not were used. Data up to 48-hours after dosing were used. Total score was imputed as the highest score after dose. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
With FLS in 4WRI / With FLS during 48WWith FLS in 4WRI / Without FLS during 48WWithout FLS in 4WRI / With FLS during 48WWithout FLS in 4WRI / Without FLS during 48W
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy86.002.009.003.00
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen87.234.267.451.06
Overall Population86.603.098.252.06

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing New or Increased FLS During the First 8 Weeks: Between FLS Management Arms

The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. New or increased FLS is defined as an FLS overall score of 2 points or greater over Screening. Pre-dose data were not used; up to 48-hour data after dosing were used. Overall score was imputed as the average score after dose. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: during the first 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy13
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen7.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Week 4 for TSQM, Convenience Scale Factor: Between FLS Management Arms

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to Week 4 using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for convenience (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. This secondary endpoint was targeted for Week 4 only. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Convenience at 4WRI; n=100, 94Change at Week 4; n=95, 90
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy65.9419.768
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen67.43617.578

[back to top]

Summary of Severity of FLS (Per FLS-S) in the First 8 Weeks Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period Between Arms

The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; F8W=first 8 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, first 8 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Severity of FLS in 4WRISeverity of FLS in F8WMean Change from 4WRI to F8W
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy1.1981.3110.113
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen1.051.036-0.013
Overall Population1.1261.1780.052

[back to top]

Summary of Severity of FLS (Per FLS-S) in the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period Between Arms

The total FLS-S is the sum of all 4 symptom scores (muscle aches, chills, fatigue and fever), each rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), with a range of 0-12 with 0 indicating no FLS and 12 indicating severe FLS. 4WRI=4-week run-in period; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Severity of FLS in 4WRISeverity of FLS in 48WMean Change from 4WRI to 48W
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy1.21.280.08
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen1.050.98-0.07
Overall Population1.131.140.01

[back to top]

Summary of FLS-VAS During the 48 Weeks of Treatment Compared to 4-Week Run-In Period: Satisfaction With FLS Treatment

Participants reported their satisfaction with the effectiveness of their FLS management regimen on a 100-mm VAS between not satisfied (0) and very satisfied (100). 4WRI=4-week run-in period; 48W=48 weeks. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, 48 weeks of treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Satisfaction in 4WRI; n=91, 86, 177Satisfaction in 48W; n=99, 94, 193Change from 4WRI to 48W; n=90, 86, 176
BIIB017 Plus Current FLS Therapy68.65472.1924.607
BIIB017 Plus Naproxen72.77876.0612.274
Overall Population70.65874.0763.467

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Global Satisfaction Scale Factor: Overall Population

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to each visit using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for global satisfaction (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (or Early Termination)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Global Satisfaction at 4WRI; n=194Change at Week 4; n=185Change at Week 12; n=175Change at Week 24; n=167Change at Week 36; n =162Change at Week 48; n=153Change at Early Termination; n=26
Overall Population75.9856.7897.3547.5759.1798.556-38.538

[back to top]

Mean Change From 4-Week Run-In Period at Each Visit for TSQM, Side-Effects Scale Factor: Overall Population

The TSQM assessed participants' global satisfaction with treatment and captured information on treatment side effects, effectiveness, and convenience. Changes from the 4-week run-in period to each visit using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for side effects (with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) are presented. 4WRI=4-week run-in. (NCT01939002)
Timeframe: 4-week run-in period, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (or Early Termination)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Side Effects at 4WRI; n=194Change at Week 4; n=185Change at Week 12; n=175Change at Week 24; n=167Change at Week 36; n=162Change at Week 48; n=153Change at Early Termination; n=26
Overall Population85.176.0655.1092.9583.371.418-18.731

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Who Achieve Sustained Viral Response at Follow-up Week 12 (SVR12) [16-Week Arm vs. 28-Week Arm]

SVR12 was declared when participants who had undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA < Lower Limit of Quantification [LLoQ]) after the 12-week lead-in also had undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing their assigned BOC treatment regimen. The Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ automated HCV test (v2.0 assay) used in this study has a LLoQ of 15 IU/mL. (NCT01945294)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week (FW) 12 (up to 40 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm70.6
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm81.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

The percentage of viral relapse (defined as confirmed HCV RNA >15 IU/mL after End-of-Treatment [EOT]) among participants who had undetectable HCV RNA at EOT was determined for each arm. The Roche COBAS™ Taqman™ automated HCV test (v2.0 assay) used in this study has a LLoQ of 15 IU/mL. (NCT01945294)
Timeframe: From EOT to FW12 (up to 12 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm20.4
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm1.1
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Neutropenia

The percentage of participants with neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.75 x10^9/L) is summarized for each arm. (NCT01945294)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm10.8
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm12.4
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anemia

The percentage of participants with anemia (hemoglobin [Hgb] <10 g/dL) was determined in each arm. (NCT01945294)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm33.3
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm43.8
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm26.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR12 Among Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Across Treatment

The percentage of participants achieving SVR12 who had undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01945294)
Timeframe: TW4, TW8, and TW12

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
% Undetectable HCV RNA at TW4 (n=25, 18, 0)% Undetectable HCV RNA at TW8 (n=101, 104, 0)% Undetectable HCV RNA at TW12 (n=100, 103, 20)
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm24.569.668.6
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm14.381.080.0
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm0.00.041.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA Across Treatment

The percentage of participants with undetectable HCV RNA (HCV RNA NCT01945294)
Timeframe: TW4, TW8, and TW12

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
TW4TW8TW12
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm24.8100.099.0
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm17.1100.0100.0
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm0.00.069.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Dose Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The percentage of participants who discontinued from BOC, BOC + RBV, or all medications due to an AE are reported. (NCT01945294)
Timeframe: From TW1 through TW48

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Discontinued from BOCDiscontinued from BOC + RDiscontinued from all Study Medication
Arm 1: 16-week Treatment Arm2.90.00.0
Arm 2: 28-week Treatment Arm7.65.75.7
Arm 3: 48-week Treatment Arm16.08.08.0

[back to top]

Change in Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Expression After Treatment With IFN Gamma

It would be highly relevant to observe marked increase macrophages (effect size > 2.5). Four patients gives over 90% power to detect such a large increase with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05. (NCT01957709)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 2 weeks post-surgery

Interventionpercentage of MHC Class I+ on tumor cell (Median)
Pre-treatmentPost-treatment
Basic Science (Interferon Gamma and MHC Expression)8.9126.6

[back to top]

MHC Class II Expression

To determine whether systemic administration of IFNg will increase class II MHC expression in SS and MRCL tumors. (NCT01957709)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 weeks post biopsy.

Interventionpercentage of MHC Class II on tumor cell (Median)
Pre-treatmentPost-treatment
Basic Science (Interferon Gamma and MHC Expression)2.5566.125

[back to top]

Changes in Immune Response

To examine changes in the immune response to MRCL and SS by examining changes in the immune infiltrates, antibody response and antigen specific T cell response before and after IFNg treatment. (NCT01957709)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 weeks post biopsy

Interventionpercentage of T cells (Median)
Pre-treatmentPost-treatment
Basic Science (Interferon Gamma and MHC Expression)0.140.82

[back to top]

Change in Whole Blood Frataxin Levels

Assessment of the change in whole blood frataxin levels as assessed by lateral flow assay using an immunoassay for frataxin. Frataxin levels in the blood were measured at each study visit. Change in frataxin level at the end of treatment (week 12) relative to frataxin level at baseline was analyzed. (NCT01965327)
Timeframe: Frataxin levels were measured at the beginning and conclusion of treatment (baseline and 12 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of baseline frataxin level (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b (ACTIMMUNE)-1.5

[back to top]

Change in Total Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Score

The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is neurological rating scale specifically developed and validated for FRDA. The FARS includes assessments of stance, gait, upper and lower limb coordination, speech, proprioception and strength. In addition to the standard neurological examination, the FARS contains three quantitative performance measures and a component that assesses activities of daily living (ADL). Quantitative performance measures include the nine-hole peg test, and a timed 25-foot walk. FARS scores correlate significantly with functional disability, activities of daily living scores and disease duration. The scores from the three subscales are added to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 159, with a higher score indicating a greater level of disability. (NCT01965327)
Timeframe: FARS score was calculated at the beginning and conclusion of treatment (baseline and 12 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon Gamma-1b (ACTIMMUNE)-4.98

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume to Month 24 Based on Rank ANCOVA

"Brain volume (a measure of brain atrophy) was measured by brain MRI scans that were read at a centralized MRI reading facility by a blinded reader.~Due to the non-normal distribution of the data for brain volume loss, the analyses for percent change from Baseline in normalized brain volume was repeated using rank-analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and observed values." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 24

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.940
Ozanimod 0.5 mg-0.710
Ozanimod 1 mg-0.690

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume to Month 24

Brain volume (a measure of brain atrophy) was measured by brain MRI scans that were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes. (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.937
Ozanimod 0.5 mg-0.707
Ozanimod 1 mg-0.707

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test

"The MSFC-LCLA is a battery including the following 4 individual scales:~Timed 25-Foot Walk is an ambulation measure of walking 25 feet with time taken recorded in seconds~9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function~Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a measure of executive cognitive function that assesses processing speed, flexibility, and calculation ability~Low-Contrast Letter Acuity Test (LCLA) used a standardized set of charts to assess low contrast visual acuity, charts are scored according to the number of letters that are identified correctly~Z-scores were calculated for for each component and averaged to create an overall composite score, using the study population as the reference population. A Z-score represents the number of standard deviations a patient's test result is higher (Z > 0) or lower (Z < 0) than the average test result (Z = 0) of the reference population. A positive change indicates improvement." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.052
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.036
Ozanimod 1 mg-0.010

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 24 Months

"The adjusted mean number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions per scan was based on the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions since Baseline over 24 months. MRI images were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.~The adjusted mean per scan over 24 months was based based on a negative binomial regression model using observed data, adjusted for region (Eastern Europe vs. Rest of the World), age at Baseline, and Baseline number of GdE lesions. The natural log transformation of the number of available MRI scans over 24 months is used as an offset term." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: 24 month treatment period; MRI scans were performed at Months 12 and 24

Interventionlesions/scan (Least Squares Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a3.183
Ozanimod 0.5 mg2.092
Ozanimod 1 mg1.835

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing Brain Lesions at Month 24

"MRI images were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.~The number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions at 24 months was analyzed based on observed data using a negative binomial regression model adjusted for region (Eastern Europe vs Rest of World), Baseline age, and Baseline number of GdE lesions, with natural log transformation of number of available MRI scans over 24 months as an offset term (1 scan for per participant)." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionlesions (Least Squares Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a0.373
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.197
Ozanimod 1 mg0.176

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product (IP), including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Serious AEs were events that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were congenital abnormalities/birth defects, or important medical events which may have required medical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes.~The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe and the relationship of each AE to treatment as unrelated, unlikely, possible, probable, or related based on timing and other known factors such as clinical state, environment, or other therapies." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug up to the first dose of the open-label extension study RPC01-3001, or up to 28 days after last dose for participants who did not continue into the open-label extension study; median duration of treatment was 24 months.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny Moderate or Severe TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Related TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Related Serious TEAEAny TEAE Leading to discontinuation of Study DrugAny TEAE Leading to Study WithdrawalAny Death on Study
Interferon Beta-1a365235193028018200
Ozanimod 0.5 mg326169191231114131
Ozanimod 1 mg324170151928113130

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary Scores

"The MSQOL-54 is a multidimensional health-related QOL measure that combines both generic and MS-specific items into a single instrument. The instrument includes 12 subscales, two summary scores, and two single-item measures.~The two summary scores - physical health and mental health - are derived from a weighted combination of scale scores.~The physical health composite score includes Physical function, Health perceptions, Energy/fatigue, Role limitations - physical, Pain, Sexual function, Social function, and Health distress.~The mental health composite score includes Health distress, Overall quality of life, Emotional well-being, Role limitations - emotional, and Cognitive function.~Each composite summary score has a range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical Health Composite SummaryMental Health Composite Summary
Interferon Beta-1a-1.526-1.831
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.609-1.182
Ozanimod 1 mg0.209-1.517

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 Months

"EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present.~The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments.~Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 3 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: From first dose to the end of the 24-month treatment period

Interventiondays (Median)
Interferon Beta-1aNA
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNA
Ozanimod 1 mgNA

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 Months

"EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present.~The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments.~Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 3 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: From first dose to the end of the 24-month treatment period

Interventiondays (Median)
Interferon Beta-1aNA
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNA
Ozanimod 1 mgNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were New or Enlarging T2 Lesion-Free at Month 24

MRI images were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes. (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a18.4
Ozanimod 0.5 mg23.5
Ozanimod 1 mg23.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Lesion-Free at Month 24

"Participants were considered lesion free at Month 24 if they did not show evidence of GdE lesions at the Month 24 MRI scan.~MRI images were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a56.2
Ozanimod 0.5 mg63.3
Ozanimod 1 mg65.6

[back to top]

Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at the End of Month 24

"A relapse was defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state for at least 30 days. Symptoms must have persisted for > 24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors. Relapses were confirmed when accompanied by objective neurological worsening based on examination by the blinded evaluator, consistent with an increase of ≥ 0.5 on the overall EDSS score relative to the most recent EDSS assessment, or 2 points on one of the functional system scale scores, or 1 point on ≥ two functional system scale scores.~Relapse rate was calculated as the total number of confirmed relapses divided by the total number of days in the study * 365.25.~ARR was based on a Poisson regression model, adjusted for region (Eastern Europe vs Rest of the World), age, and the Baseline number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and included the natural log transformation of time on study as an offset term." (NCT02047734)
Timeframe: At the end of month 24

Interventionrelapses/year (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a0.276
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.218
Ozanimod 1 mg0.172

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Hematology

Shift to low includes normal to low, high to low, and unknown to low. Shift to high includes normal to high, low to high, and unknown to high. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Screening to Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin: Shift to Low; n=28, 36Hemoglobin: Shift to High; n=32, 38Hematocrit: Shift to Low; n=31, 37Hematocrit: Shift to High; n=32, 38Red Blood Cell Count: Shift to Low; n=25, 32Red Blood Cell Count: Shift to High; n=33, 37White Blood Cell Count: Shift to Low; n=27, 30White Blood Cell Count: Shift to High; n=33, 38Neutrophils: Shift to Low; n=27, 34Neutrophils: Shift to High; n=33, 37Basophils: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Basophils: Shift to High; n=33, 38Monocytes: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Monocytes: Shift to High; n=33, 38Lymphocytes: Shift to Low; n=33, 22Lymphocytes: Shift to High; n=33, 38Eosinophils: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Eosinophils: Shift to High; n=33, 38Platelet Count: Shift to Low; n=31, 38Platelet Count: Shift to High; n=32, 37
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations10201022320002400010
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations00104040200020100000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Blood Chemistry

Shift to low includes normal to low, high to low, and unknown to low. Shift to high includes normal to high, low to high, and unknown to high. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Screening to Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alanine Aminotransferase: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Alanine Aminotransferase: Shift to High; n=30, 35Aspartate Aminotransferase: Shift to Low; n=33, 37Aspartate Aminotransferase: Shift to High; n=33,36Total Bilirubin: Shift to Low; n=32, 37Total Bilirubin: Shift to High; n=33, 38Gamma-glutamyl Transferase: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Gamma-glutamyl Transferase: Shift to High; n=33,38Blood Urea Nitrogen: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Blood Urea Nitrogen: Shift to High; n=33, 38Creatinine: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Creatinine: Shift to High; n=33, 37Sodium: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Sodium: Shift to High; n=33, 38Potassium: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Potassium: Shift to High; n=33, 38Chloride: Shift to Low; n=33, 38Chloride: Shift to High; n=33, 38
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations020100000100000010
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations010010000100000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Temperature increase: > 38 celcius (C) or ≥ 1 C increase from baseline. Pulse increase: > 120 beats per minute (bpm) or > 20 bpm increase from baseline. Pulse decrease: < 50 bpm or > 20 bpm decrease from baseline. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) increase: > 180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or > 40 mmHg from baseline. SBP decrease: < 90 mmHg or > 30 mmHg decrease from baseline. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increase: > 105 mmHg or > 30 mmHg increase from baseline. DBP decrease: < 50 mmHg or > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Screening to Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Temperature IncreasePulse IncreasePulse DecreaseSBP IncreaseSBP DecreaseDBP IncreaseDBP Decrease
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations0101000
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations0100010

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum Tetanus Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination

Median serum titer ratios from prevaccination to 4 weeks after Td vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionratio (Median)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations6.128
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations4.463

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Vaccination-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could have jeopardized the participant or required intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any EventModerate or Severe EventSevere EventEvent Related to Existing TherapySerious EventSerious Event Related to Existing TherapySerious Event Related to Td VaccineSerious Event Related to PPSV23 VaccineSerious Event Related to MCV4 VaccineWithdrew From Study Due to an Event
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations18923000000
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations16703000000

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum Pneumococcal Antibodies (Serotype 3) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination

Median serum titer ratios from prevaccination to 4 weeks after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionratio (Median)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations9.667
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations4.741

[back to top]

Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 8 (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-fold rise in anti-pneumococcal serum IgG levels against serotype 8 from prevaccination to 4 weeks (28 days) after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations88
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations95

[back to top]

Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 8 (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 4-fold rise in anti-pneumococcal serum IgG levels against serotype 8 from prevaccination to 4 weeks (28 days) after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations85
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations82

[back to top]

Percentage of Tetanus Responders (≥ 2-Fold Rise) at Day 28 Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-fold rise in anti-tetanus serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels (responders) from prevaccination to 4 weeks after Td vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations73
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations68

[back to top]

Percentage of Tetanus Responders (≥ 4-Fold Rise) at Day 28 Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 4-fold rise in anti-tetanus serum IgG levels (responders) from prevaccination to 4 weeks after Td vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations61
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations42

[back to top]

Percentage of Meningococcal Serogroup C Responders (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 4-fold rise in anti-meningococcal serum IgG levels against serotype C from prevaccination to 4 weeks after MCV4 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations38
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations37

[back to top]

Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-fold rise in anti-pneumococcal serum IgG levels against serotype 3 from prevaccination to 4 weeks (28 days) after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations79
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations66

[back to top]

Percentage of Meningococcal Serogroup C Responders (≥ 2-Fold Rise) Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-fold rise in anti-meningococcal serum IgG levels against serotype C from prevaccination to 4 weeks after MCV4 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations53
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations53

[back to top]

Percentage of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 (≥ 4-Fold Rise) Responders Compared to Prevaccination Level

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 4-fold rise in anti-pneumococcal serum IgG levels against serotype 3 from prevaccination to 4 weeks (28 days) after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations70
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations47

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum Meningococcal Antibodies (Serogroup C) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination

Median serum titer ratios from prevaccination to 4 weeks after MCV4 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionratio (Median)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations3.300
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations3.408

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum Pneumococcal Antibodies (Serotype 8) Level at Day 28 to Prevaccination

Median serum titer ratios from prevaccination to 4 weeks after PPSV23 vaccination. (NCT02097849)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 (Day 28) postvaccination

Interventionratio (Median)
Non-Pegylated IFN Treated Plus Vaccinations27.000
Tecfidera Treated Plus Vaccinations13.845

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

SVR is defined as HCV-PCR assay result below limit of detection or viral load ≤50 IU/ml and/or qualitatively negative at least 12 weeks after the end of treatment at follow up. Follow-up visit occurred at 12 to 24 weeks following discontinuation of treatment. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Main Analysis Set41.4
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated36.7

[back to top]

Duration of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Therapy

Treatment duration was evaluated for participants for whom dates of treatment start and end of therapy were documented. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

Interventionweeks (Median)
Main Analysis Set27.3
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated29.3

[back to top]

Percentage Cumulative Dose of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Received

Data for the accumulation of the cumulative dose of peginterferon alfa-2a were analyzed and reported as the percentage of the intended dose participants received. Cumulative doses were evaluated for participants for whom dosage data were documented consistently throughout the observational period. If the treatment was ongoing at the study end, the cumulative dose was aggregated for the documented observational period. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 96

Interventionpercentage of cumulated dose (Median)
Main Analysis Set97.9
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated94.8

[back to top]

Percentage Cumulative Dose of Ribavirin Received

Data for the accumulation of the cumulative dose of ribavirin were analyzed and reported as the percentage of the intended dose participants received. Cumulative doses were evaluated for participants for whom dosage data were documented consistently throughout the observational period. If the treatment was ongoing at the study end, the cumulative dose was aggregated for the documented observational period. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 96

Interventionpercentage of cumulated dose (Median)
Main Analysis Set100.00
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated97.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response (EVR)

EVR is defined as HCV-PCR assay result qualitatively negative and/or decline of viral load of ≥2 log levels and/or viral load ≤50 IU/ml at Week 12. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Main Analysis Set71.2
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated77.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment (EOT) Response

EOT Response is defined as HCV-PCR assay result below limit of detection or viral load ≤50 IU/ml and/or qualitatively negative at the end of treatment. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Main Analysis Set59.2
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated51.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR)

RVR is defined as Hepatitis C-Virus (HCV) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay result qualitatively negative and/or viral load ≤50 International Units/milliliter (IU/ml) at Week 4. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: At Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Main Analysis Set40.0
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated41.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADR)

(NCT02106156)
Timeframe: Up to Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Main Analysis Set3.5
Elastography Analysis Set: Treated3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With the Most Frequent Concomitant Medications

Most frequent concomitant medications were defined as those, which were observed in >1 % of participants. (NCT02106156)
Timeframe: At Baseline (Day 1)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AnilidesSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsProton pump inhibitorsPropionic acid derivativesPropulsivesOther antidepressantsAngiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitorsThyroid hormonesCorticosteroids, potent (group III)Benzodiazepine related drugsPyrazolonesBeta blocking agents, selectiveNon-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors
Main Analysis Set10.69.95.34.72.32.32.01.81.71.51.41.31.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Virological Response

Virological response is defined as HCV RNA <15 IU/mL. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=3)Week 8 (n=18)Week 12 (n=17)Week 24 (n=16)
Triple Combination Therapy0.073.773.778.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation

Treatment discontinuation is reported by sub-categories of reasons for treatment discontinuation. Futility rule is defined as HCV RNA drop <3 log10 at Week 8, HCV RNA >/=100 IU/mL at Week 12, or HCV RNA >/=15 IU/mL at Week 24. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sponsor's decisionAdverse eventFutility rule
Triple Combination Therapy742

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Virological Relapse

Virological response is defined as HCV RNA >/=15 IU/mL during the treatment free follow-up period in participants with virological response at the end of treatment. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Week 49 up to Week 72

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Combination Therapy1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough

Virological breakthrough is defined as either HCV RNA >=15 IU/mL in participants with prior virological response or as an increase in HCV RNA >/=1 log10 above nadir. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Combination Therapy1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Futility

Treatment discontinuation due to futility is defined as HCV RNA drop <3 log10 at Week 8, HCV RNA >/=100 IU/mL at Week 12, or HCV RNA >/=15 IU/mL at Week 24. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Combination Therapy2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Combination Therapy17

[back to top]

Sustained Virological Response 24 (SVR24) Rate

The SVR 24 rate is defined as percentage of participants with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) less than 15 international unit/milliliter (IU/mL) after the 24-weeks follow-up. (NCT02118597)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT) at Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Triple Combination Therapy0

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

The length of time from the start of treatment until disease progression, per RECIST 1.1 considering only patients whose deaths were from cancer. Disease progression per RECIST 1.1 Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Up to18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen15.9

[back to top] [back to top]

CXCL10 (Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10) Levels

Chemokine CXCL10 (Interferon gamma-induced protein 10) concentration levels measures in peripheral blood as a biomarker of anti-tumor activity. Increased levels can be predictive of good prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen1221.516335.0137.6

[back to top]

CXCL11 (C-X-C Motif Chemokine 11) Levels

CXCL11 (C-X-C motif chemokine 11) protein concentration levels measures in peripheral blood. Increased levels can be predictive of good prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen359.412893.2208.9

[back to top]

Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Levels

Interleukin 10 (IL-10) (human cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor (CSIF)) concentration levels measures in peripheral blood. Increased levels of IL-10 is associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen1.27.97.5

[back to top]

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Cytokine Levels

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentration levels measures in peripheral blood. Increased levels of IL-6 is associated with associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + 1 Cycle of Chemokine Modulatory Regimen15.232.811.1

[back to top]

Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Cytokine Levels

Interleukin-8 (IL-8) cytokine concentration levels measures in peripheral blood. Increased levels of IL-8 is associated with associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + 1 Cycle of Chemokine Modulatory Regimen9.516.928.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The length of time from the start of treatment that diagnosed patients are still alive. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen52

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The length of time during and after the treatment that patients remain alive with disease that does not progress. Per RECIST 1.1, Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
colon cancerappendiceal cancerMesothelioma
α DC1 Vaccine + Chemokine Modulatory Regimen1916NA

[back to top]

Stromal Derived Factor 1 Alpha (SDF-1A/CXCL-12) Chemokine Levels

Levels of stromal derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1A/CXCL-12) chemokine in peripheral blood. Higher levels of SDF-1A/CXCL-12 is associated with good prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + 1 Cycle of Chemokine Modulatory Regimen1267.32160.3510.0

[back to top]

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TFNα) Cytokine Levels

Tumor necrosis factor (TFNα) cytokine concentration levels measures in peripheral blood. Higher TFNα levels is associated with good prognosis. (NCT02151448)
Timeframe: Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1), prior to vaccine booster (Week 4) and after vaccine booster (Week 8)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Prior to vaccine administration (Week 1)Prior to vaccine booster (Week 4)After vaccine booster (Week 8)
α DC1 Vaccine + 1 Cycle of Chemokine Modulatory Regimen10.831.017.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event was any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT02155322)
Timeframe: From first dose through follow-up; up to 13 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Because of AEs

An adverse event was any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body whether or not considered related to the study treatment. (NCT02155322)
Timeframe: From first dose to last dose of treatment; up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
PEG-IFN3.1

[back to top]

Proportion of Clinical Responders (Complete Response + Partial Response)

Response determination will be made according to the RECIST criteria. Complete response defined as the disappearance of target lesion, confirmed at 1-4 weeks. Partial response defined as 30% decrease in longest dimension of target lesion, confirmed at 1-4 weeks. (NCT02159482)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon-alfa-2a0

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing an Increase in the Magnitude of the Tumor Antigen-specific Immune Response

The proportion of patients experiencing an increase in the magnitude of the tumor antigen-specific immune response following the administration of interferon will also be estimated. Immune response will be determined by ELISPOT analysis. (NCT02159482)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon-alfa-2a60

[back to top]

Serum HCV RNA Level

(NCT02168361)
Timeframe: 4 and 12 weeks into therapy

,
InterventionIU/ml (Median)
Serum HCV RNA level at 4 weeksSerum HCV RNA level at 8 weeks
All Oral Therapy15431
Interferon-containing Arm880740

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 (SVR-12)

Undetectable virus (sensitive nucleic acid test) in Serum at 3 months post-therapy (NCT02168361)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post-therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Oral Therapy54
Interferon-containing Arm18

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS: The time from registration to death or date of last contact. Participants with overall survival at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimator will be utilized. (NCT02218164)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Expired in less than a yearAlive at the end of the yearHad not completed survival follow-up at closeout
Capecitabine or 5-FU With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b422

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: Stable Disease (SD); Partial Response (PR); Complete Response (CR). Response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT02218164)
Timeframe: 9 weeks per participant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseaseComplete ResponsePartial Response
Capecitabine or 5-FU With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b411

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: Alive without RECIST progression. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT02218164)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Capecitabine or 5-FU With Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b11.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ribavirin Compliance at ≥ 95%, 80% - 95%, and < 80%

Number of participants with ribavirin compliance at ≥ 95%, 80% - 95%, and < 80%. (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment to the first 48 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 0 to Week 271963978Week 2 to Week 471963978Week 4 to Week 1271963978Week 12 to Week 1671963978Week 16 to Week 2071963978Week 20 to Week 2471963978Week 24 to Week 2871963978Week 28 to Week 3271963978Week 32 to Week 3671963978Week 36 to Week 4471963978Week 44 to Week 4871963978
Compliance < 80%Compliance ≥ 95%Compliance 80% - 95%
PegINF-ribavirin0
PegINF-ribavirin1
PegINF-ribavirin17
PegINF-ribavirin16
PegINF-ribavirin15
PegINF-ribavirin2
PegINF-ribavirin13
PegINF-ribavirin14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least a Serious Adverse Events Associated With Study Treatment (Peg-interferon and Ribavirin)

Number of participants with at least a serious adverse events associated with study treatment (peg-interferon and ribavirin). (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment to 6 months after treatment discontinuation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PegINF-ribavirin1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response 6 Months After Treatment Discontinuation

Number of Participants with Sustained Virological Response 6 Months After Treatment Discontinuation, (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: 6 months after end of treatment, i.e. 1.5 years after treatment initiation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PegINF-ribavirin10

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events by Severity Grade

Number of adverse events (AE) by severity grade. The severity grading scale is based on the DAIDS grading table, the grading scale ranging from grades 1 to 5: Grade 1 indicates a mild event, Grade 2 indicates a moderate event, Grade 3 indicates a severe event, Grade 4 indicates a potentially life-threatening event, and Grade 5 indicates death. (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment to 6 months after treatment discontinuation

Interventionevents (Number)
AE grade 1AE grade 2AE grade 3
PegINF-ribavirin1871

[back to top]

Number of Participants Grouped by HIV-1 RNA Concentrations

Number of participants grouped by HIV-1 RNA concentrations (Detected vs. Not Detected). (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: At time of treatment discontinuation (whatever its date) and 6 months thereafter

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HIV-1 RNA not detectedHIV-1 RNA detectedMissing
PegINF-ribavirin1611

[back to top]

Number of Participants Able to Perform Self-injections of Peg-interferon

Number of participants able to perform self-injections of peg-interferon. (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment to the first 48 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 0 to Week 1271963978Week 12 to Week 1671963978Week 16 to Week 2871963978Week 28 to Week 3271963978Week 32 to Week 4871963978
PegINF not injectedPegINF injected
PegINF-ribavirin17
PegINF-ribavirin0
PegINF-ribavirin16
PegINF-ribavirin1
PegINF-ribavirin15
PegINF-ribavirin13
PegINF-ribavirin14

[back to top]

Number of Participants Completed the First 24 and 48 Weeks of Treatment

Number of participants completed the first 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. (NCT02247440)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment to the first 48 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Completed the first 24 weeks of treatmentCompleted the first 48 weeks of treatment
PegINF-ribavirin1414

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Who Missed Any Partial Days From Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of subjects who missed any partial days from work due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Rebif In RMS Subjects1
Rebif in CIS Subjects2

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Medication Adherence Based on Morisky Medication Adherence Score

The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) is a valid and reliable instrument that consists of 8 items that measure medication adherence. The scores of the MMAS-8 range from 0 to 8. This self-report scale consists of 7 items answered with a yes or no and 1 item with a 5-point Likert scale. A score below 6 indicates low adherence, a score between 6 to < 8 indicates medium adherence and a score of 8 indicates high adherence. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Low AdherenceMedium AdherenceHigh Adherence
Rebif in CIS Subjects368
Rebif In RMS Subjects234521

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Full Days Missed From Work by Subjects

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of full days missed from work by subjects were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects46.5
Rebif in CIS Subjects3.5

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Days Per Week Assistant Worked For Subject Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of days per week assistant worked for subject due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventiondays per week (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects2.5
Rebif in CIS Subjects2.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Reasons of Missed Injections

Number of subjects with the reasons of missed injections were presented. Aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase are abbreviated as ALT and AST respectively. Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and glutamic pyruvic transaminase are abbreviated as GOT and GPT respectively. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Forgot to InjectionTiredFear of InjectionDid not want to have InjectionPain at Injection siteFlu-like symptomsAdverse eventDevice brokenDevice malfunctionsDevice not functioningDifficulty using the deviceElevated ALT and ASTElevated liver enzymesIncreased GOT and GPT levelsLocal erythema and indurationMissed study medicationForgot the device at homeNo access to medicationcould not came at the scheduled visitPatient redrawn intracutaneousStop the treatmentTechnical problems with Rebismart
Rebif In RMS and CIS Subjects4823115542111112211111111

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Times Subjects Visited Emergency Room Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of times subjects visited emergency room due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionemergency room visits (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.0
Rebif in CIS Subjects0.0

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Visits to Clinic by Subjects Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of visits to clinic by subjects due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionvisits (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.2
Rebif in CIS Subjects0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Adherence

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with treatment adherence under different categories (<=50%, >50-75%, >75-90%, >90%) were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Adherence <=50%Adherence >50-75%Adherence >75-90%Adherence >90%Missing
Rebif in CIS Subjects11.80.00.088.20.0
Rebif In RMS Subjects2.22.213.580.91.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Relapse by Adherence Category

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to multiple sclerosis (MS), accompanied by an appropriate new neurological abnormality or focal neurological dysfunction lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever, and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with relapses by adherence categories (<=50%, >50-75%, >75-90%, >90%) were presented. Adherence missing are the subjects who withdrew before 12 months and who did not have any relapses before withdrawal. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Relapse Status Yes, Adherence <= 50%Relapse Status Yes, Adherence >90%Relapse Status No, Adherence <= 50%Relapse Status No, Adherence >90%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence <=50%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence >75-90%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence >90%
Rebif in CIS Subjects0.06.750.073.350.00.020.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Relapse by Adherence Category

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to multiple sclerosis (MS), accompanied by an appropriate new neurological abnormality or focal neurological dysfunction lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever, and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with relapses by adherence categories (<=50%, >50-75%, >75-90%, >90%) were presented. Adherence missing are the subjects who withdrew before 12 months and who did not have any relapses before withdrawal. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Relapse Status Yes, Adherence <= 50%Relapse Status Yes, Adherence >50-75%Relapse Status Yes, Adherence >75-90%Relapse Status Yes, Adherence >90%Relapse Status Yes, Adherence MissingRelapse Status No, Adherence <= 50%Relapse Status No, Adherence >50-75%Relapse Status No, Adherence >75-90%Relapse Status No, Adherence >90%Relapse Status No, Adherence MissingRelapse Status Missing, Adherence <=50%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence >50-75%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence >75-90%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence >90%Relapse Status Missing, Adherence Missing
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.00.016.719.40.00.050.050.072.20.0100.050.033.38.3100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Prematurely Terminated Treatment and Reasons

Percentage of subjects who prematurely terminated treatment and reasons were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Adverse EventLost to follow-upProtocol Non-complianceWithdrew ConsentPain at Injection site and fear of InjectionPersonal causesPersonal decision
Rebif in CIS Subjects5.911.80.00.00.05.90.0
Rebif In RMS Subjects2.22.21.13.41.14.51.1

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Visits by Healthcare Professional to Subjects' Home

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of visits by healthcare professional to subjects' home were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionvisits (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.0
Rebif in CIS Subjects0.0

[back to top]

Overall Evaluation of RebiSmart Use as Assessed by Investigator

Evaluation of RebiSmart was categorized under very easy, quite easy, Neither easy nor difficult, very difficult and missing (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Very easyQuite easyNeither easy nor difficultQuite difficultVery difficultMissing
Rebif in CIS Subjects1311020
Rebif In RMS Subjects46329011

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Working Days Missed by Relative or Friend Due to Subjects' Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of working days missed by relative or friend due to subjects' MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects1
Rebif in CIS Subjects3

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Whose Relatives or Friends Missed Work Due to Subjects' Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of subjects whose relatives or friends missed work due to subjects' MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionsubject (Number)
Rebif In RMS Subjects1
Rebif in CIS Subjects1

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Number of Relapses in RMS Subjects

A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to multiple sclerosis (MS), accompanied by an appropriate new neurological abnormality or focal neurological dysfunction lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever, and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionrelapses (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.2

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Days Subjects Hospitalized Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of days subjects hospitalized due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects0.1
Rebif in CIS Subjects0.0

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Accomplished Less Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of subjects accomplished less work due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Rebif In RMS Subjects7
Rebif in CIS Subjects1

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Hours Per Day Missed From Work by Subjects

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of hours per day missed from work by subjects were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionhours per day (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects8.0
Rebif in CIS Subjects3.0

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Who Missed Any Full Days From Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of subjects who missed any full days from work due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Rebif In RMS Subjects2
Rebif in CIS Subjects2

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Hours Per Day Assistant Worked for Subject Due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Number of hours per week assistant worked for subject due to MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionhours per day (Mean)
Rebif In RMS Subjects2.0
Rebif in CIS Subjects4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Relapse-free RMS Subjects

"A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to multiple sclerosis (MS), accompanied by an appropriate new neurological abnormality or focal neurological dysfunction lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever, and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. Relapse-free RMS subjects were those who did not had relapse during 12 month treatment period. Data was planned to be reported for Rebif in RMS Subjects arm." (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Rebif In RMS Subjects66.3

[back to top]

Time to the First Relapse for CIS Subjects

"A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new symptom or worsening of an old symptom, attributable to MS, accompanied by an appropriate new neurological abnormality or focal neurological dysfunction lasting at least 24 hours in the absence of fever, and preceded by stability or improvement for at least 30 days. Time to the first relapse was defined as the duration from start of the treatment until first relapse. Data was planned to be reported for Rebif in CIS Subjects arm." (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rebif in CIS SubjectsNA

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI was defined as weight in kilogram (kg) divided by height in square meter (m^2). (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionKg/m^2 (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Rebif In RMS and CIS Subjects23.5723.51

[back to top]

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Rebif in CIS Subjects1.241.13
Rebif In RMS Subjects1.871.80

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects Visiting Different Types of Doctors During Their Clinical Visit

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Subjects who took consultations with specialists, general practitioners for MS were presented. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
General practitionerSpecialist
Rebif in CIS Subjects10
Rebif In RMS Subjects115

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire - Number of Subjects With Percentage of Work Completed Despite of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Subjects was assessed at Month 12 utilizing the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ), a subject self-report tool designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Healthcare resource utilization was collected in the following areas: admissions and stays in the hospital, emergency room, consultations with specialists, general practitioners, or other healthcare professionals, work productivity, health care financial impact. Amount of work done by subjects in spite of multiple sclerosis was presented under different percentages (0-100%) (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
0% Work Completed10% Work Completed20% Work Completed30% Work Completed40% Work Completed50% Work Completed60% Work Completed70% Work Completed80% Work Completed90% Work Completed100% Work Completed
Rebif in CIS Subjects00000000100
Rebif In RMS Subjects01010000320

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Event or Adverse Drug Reaction (AE/ADR), Serious AE/ADR, AE/ADR Leading to Death and AE/ADR Leading to Early Termination

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or clinical investigation in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An ADR was any unfavourable or unintended response (adverse event) that could possibly be related to drug treatment. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. AE/ADR was planned to be reported for both the arms together. (NCT02254304)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionsubjects (Number)
AE/ADRSerious AE/ADRAE/ADR Leading to DeathAE/ADR Leading to Early Termination
Rebif30104

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Loss of HBsAg

This endpoint is defined as loss of HBsAg at 1 year post-treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) at 24 Weeks Post-End of Treatment/End of Untreated Observation

This endpoint is defined as loss of HBsAg at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80). The percentage of responders (response rate) and 95% CI (using the Clopper-Pearson method) for the response rate are presented for each group. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment/at the end of untreated observation (Week 80)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir3.8
Untreated Control Participants0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Antigen (HBeAg)

This endpoint is defined as loss of HBeAg at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants12.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Different Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels (Less Than [<] 20,000 International Units Per Milliliter [IU/mL], < 2000 IU/mL, or Undetectable HBV DNA)

This endpoint measures different HBV DNA levels (<20000 IU/mL, <2000 IU/mL and undetectable) measured by PCR or hybridization at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-treatment in the treated group. HBV-DNA undetectable is defined as <29 IU/mL. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HBV-DNA <20000 IU/mL at follow up Week 24/Week 80HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL at follow up Week 24/Week 80HBV-DNA Undetectable at follow up Week 24/Week 80HBV-DNA <20000 IU/mL 1 year post-end of treatmentHBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL 1 year post-end of treatmentHBV-DNA Undetectable 1 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir7.77.70.015.47.70.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Different Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels (Less Than [<] 20,000 International Units Per Milliliter [IU/mL], < 2000 IU/mL, or Undetectable HBV DNA)

This endpoint measures different HBV DNA levels (<20000 IU/mL, <2000 IU/mL and undetectable) measured by PCR or hybridization at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-treatment in the treated group. HBV-DNA undetectable is defined as <29 IU/mL. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HBV-DNA <20000 IU/mL at follow up Week 24/Week 80HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL at follow up Week 24/Week 80HBV-DNA Undetectable at follow up Week 24/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants12.112.16.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HBV DNA Levels in the Untreated Control Participants

This outcome measure presents HBV DNA levels measured at defined time points from baseline in the Untreated Control arm. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 32, 56 and end of untreated observation (Week 80)

Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 32Week 56Week 80
Untreated Control Participants8.228.297.577.24

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL

This endpoint measures the combined response for HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The HBeAg is defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants9.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL

This endpoint measures the combined response for HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The HBeAg is defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 801 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir0.07.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL

This endpoint measures the combined response for HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA Levels <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The HBeAg is defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants9.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Combined Response for HBeAg Seroconversion (Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe) and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL

This endpoint measures the combined response for HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA Levels <2000 IU/mL at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The HBeAg is defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 801 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir0.07.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 weeks post-treatment/end of untreated observation (Week 80)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
With at least one Non-Serious AEWith at least one Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir92.30
Untreated Control Participants45.53.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Envelope Antibody (Anti-HBe), Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe

This endpoint measures the seroconversion to anti-HBe defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants9.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Envelope Antibody (Anti-HBe), Defined as Loss of HBeAg and Presence of Anti-HBe

This endpoint measures the seroconversion to anti-HBe defined as loss of HBeAg and presence of anti-HBe at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 801 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir0.07.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Antigen (HBeAg)

This endpoint is defined as loss of HBeAg at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 801 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir3.811.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs), Defined as Loss of HBsAg and Presence of Anti-HBs

This endpoint measures the seroconversion to anti-HBs defined as loss of HBsAg and presence of anti-HBs at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 80
Untreated Control Participants0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs), Defined as Loss of HBsAg and Presence of Anti-HBs

This endpoint measures the seroconversion to anti-HBs defined as loss of HBsAg and presence of anti-HBs at 24 weeks post-treatment (follow-up Week 24)/end of untreated observation (Week 80) and at 1 year post-end of treatment in the treated group. The 95% Confidence Interval of response rate is calculated by Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-treatment /end of untreated observation (Week 80), and 1 year post-end of treatment (End of treatment = Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
24 Weeks post-treatment/Week 801 year post-end of treatment
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir3.83.8

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Peg-INF-Alfa-2A

The serum concentration of Peg-INF-Alfa-2A was measured in picogram/milliliter. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12, 16, 20, 32, 44, 56

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Week 12 PredoseWeek 16 PredoseWeek 20 PredoseWeek 32 PredoseWeek 32 24-48h Post-doseWeek 32 72-96h Post-doseWeek 32 168h Post-doseWeek 44 PredoseWeek 56 Predose
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir84301630013800149002270023000193002190025400

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HBV DNA Levels in the Peg-INF-Alfa-2A (Treated) Arm

This outcome measure presents HBV DNA levels measured at defined time points from baseline in the Peg-INF-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir arm. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, 20, 32, 44, 56, Follow up Week 4 and 24

Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 20Week 32Week 44Week 56Fu Week 4Fu Week 24
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir8.024.743.542.562.152.214.347.31

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modification or Interruption

This endpoint measures AEs and lab abnormalities leading to dose interruption or dose modification. Does modification included dose reduced, dose increased or drug interrupted. Adverse events included laboratory abnormalities reported as adverse events. (NCT02263079)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 weeks post-end of treatment

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alfa-2A + Lamivudine or Entecavir23.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test

"The MSFC-LCLA is a battery including the following 4 individual scales:~Timed 25-Foot Walk is an ambulation measure of walking 25 feet with time taken recorded in seconds~9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function~Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a measure of executive cognitive function that assesses processing speed, flexibility, and calculation ability~Low-Contrast Letter Acuity Test (LCLA) used a standardized set of charts to assess low contrast visual acuity, charts are scored according to the number of letters that are identified correctly~Z-scores were calculated for for each component and averaged to create an overall composite score, using the study population as the reference population. A z-score represents the number of standard deviations a patient's test result is higher (z > 0) or lower (z < 0) than the average test result (z = 0) of the reference population. A positive change indicates improvement." (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

Interventionz-score (Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.022
Ozanimod 0.5 mg-0.007
Ozanimod 1 mg0.003

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 Months

The number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions per scan was based on the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions since Baseline over treatment period. (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: 12 month treatment period; MRI scans were assessed at Month 6 and Month 12

InterventionT2 lesions/scan (Least Squares Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a2.836
Ozanimod 0.5 mg2.139
Ozanimod 1 mg1.465

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12

(NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionlesions (Least Squares Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a0.433
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.287
Ozanimod 1 mg0.160

[back to top]

Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment Period

"The relapse rate was based on confirmed relapses. A relapse was defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state for at least 30 days. Symptoms must have persisted for > 24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors. Relapses were confirmed when accompanied by objective neurological worsening based on examination by the blinded evaluator, consistent with an increase of ≥ 0.5 on the overall EDSS score relative to the most recent EDSS assessment, or 2 points on one of the functional system scale scores, or 1 point on ≥ two functional system scale scores.~Relapse rate was calculated as the total number of relapses divided by the total number of days in the study * 365.25.~ARR was adjusted for region (Eastern Europe vs rest of world), Baseline age, and Baseline number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions; the natural log transformation of time on study was included as an offset term." (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionrelapses/year (Least Squares Mean)
Interferon Beta-1a0.350
Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.241
Ozanimod 1 mg0.181

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume at Month 12

Brain volume (a measure of brain atrophy) was analyzed by MRI. (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Interferon Beta-1a-0.57
Ozanimod 0.5 mg-0.50
Ozanimod 1 mg-0.39

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product (IP). An AE can be any unfavorable or unintended sign, including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IP whether or not considered related to the IP. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing inpatient hospitalization. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe. (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until 28 days following the last dose of study drug; mean exposure to study drug was 13.5 months for interferon beta-1a and 13.6 months for each ozanimod group.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny Moderate or Severe TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Suspected TEAEAny Related TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Suspected Serious TEAEAny Related Serious TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Stopping of Study DrugAny TEAE Leading to Study WithdrawalAny DeathAny Death related to Study Drug
Interferon Beta-1a3361821083131100161600
Ozanimod 0.5 mg2591131076816007700
Ozanimod 1 mg26813879171331131300

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary Scores

"The MSQOL-54 is a multidimensional health-related QOL measure that combines both generic and MS-specific items into a single instrument. The instrument includes 12 subscales, two summary scores, and two single-item measures.~The two summary scores - physical health and mental health - are derived from a weighted combination of scale scores.~The physical health composite score includes Physical function, Health perceptions, Energy/fatigue, Role limitations - physical, Pain, Sexual function, Social function, and Health distress.~The mental health composite score includes Health distress, Overall quality of life, Emotional well-being, Role limitations - emotional, and Cognitive function.~Each composite summary score has a range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical health composite summaryMental health composite summary
Interferon Beta-1a0.046-0.123
Ozanimod 0.5 mg1.4140.283
Ozanimod 1 mg1.9250.260

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 Months

"EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present.~The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments.~Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 6 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later." (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: From first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment period

Interventiondays (Median)
Interferon Beta-1aNA
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNA
Ozanimod 1 mgNA

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 Months

"EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel & bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present.~The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments.~Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 3 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later." (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: From first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment period

Interventiondays (Median)
Interferon Beta-1aNA
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNA
Ozanimod 1 mgNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were T2 Lesion-Free at Month 12

MRI scans were analyzed by blinded centralized reading facility. (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a23.44
Ozanimod 0.5 mg26.39
Ozanimod 1 mg27.96

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing Lesion-Free at Month 12

MRI scans were analyzed by blinded centralized reading facility. (NCT02294058)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Beta-1a63.17
Ozanimod 0.5 mg68.29
Ozanimod 1 mg74.05

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 5

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 5 in Fellow Eye276302580206
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 5 in Study Eye3746054731083
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Fellow Eye717-204-35.5
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Study Eye76.58-240-310

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 52 in Fellow Eye270307457197
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 52 in Study Eye3025034371175
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Fellow Eye122-327-44.5
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Study Eye4.5-94-276-218

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 8 in Fellow Eye276224667220
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 8 in Study Eye3535444561000
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Fellow Eye7-61-117-21.5
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Study Eye55.5-53-257-393

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 1 in Fellow Eye275317703258
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 1 in Study Eye3316076051418
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-3-2-42-2
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Study Eye24-12-975

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 2 in Fellow Eye278318682246
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 2 in Study Eye3216116241427
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0-1-63-14
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Study Eye14-8-7814

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 3

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 3 in Fellow Eye277320656243
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 3 in Study Eye3305876071393
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-11-89-17
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Study Eye23-32-95-20

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 2

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 2 in Fellow Eye276317687234
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 2 in Study Eye3335305521233
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-2-2-58-26
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Study Eye26-89-150-180

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 5

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 5 in Fellow Eye282316591243
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 5 in Study Eye3855765091089
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Fellow Eye4-3-154-17
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Study Eye78-43-193-324

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 52

,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 52 in Fellow Eye277472233
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-1-273-27

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 52 in Study Eye3094974451221
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Study Eye2-122-257-192

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-0.1-0.3-3-0.2
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Study Eye-0.15-0.05-0.951
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day 2 in Fellow Eye710.915.559.05
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day 2 in Study Eye7.114.115.1537.3

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 2

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0.2-0.2-1.55-0.25
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Study Eye0.35-1.05-1.8-3.8
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 2 in Fellow Eye7.311179
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 2 in Study Eye7.613.114.332.5

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 3

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0.350.05-1.55-0.15
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Study Eye0.25-0.4-0.8-1.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day 3 in Fellow Eye7.4511.25179.1
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day 3 in Study Eye7.513.7515.335

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 5

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0.20-2.85-0.15
Difference at Week 5 From Baseline in Study Eye0.15-0.25-2.1-7.2
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 5 in Fellow Eye7.311.215.79.1
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 5 in Study Eye7.413.91429.1

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-0.10.1-4.25-0.35
Difference at Week 52 From Baseline in Study Eye-0.35-1.45-2.3-4
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 52 in Fellow Eye711.314.38.9
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 52 in Study Eye6.912.713.832.3

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 3

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 3 in Fellow Eye274299682.5220
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 3 in Study Eye323587.56211361.5
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Fellow Eye514-101.5-21.5
Difference at Day 3 From Baseline in Study Eye25.5-9.5-92-31.5

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 2 in Fellow Eye279304.5700.5220
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 2 in Study Eye309.56056131392.5
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye1019.5-83.5-21.5
Difference at Day 2 From Baseline in Study Eye128-100-0.5

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0.3-0.3-1.450.15
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Study Eye0.15-0.65-2.3-8.7
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 8 in Fellow Eye7.410.917.19.4
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Week 8 in Study Eye7.413.513.827.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 1 in Fellow Eye270.5298.5713.5232.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Day 1 in Study Eye3146025981394.5
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Fellow Eye1.513.5-70.5-9
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Study Eye16.55-1151.5

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Week 8 in Fellow Eye80657047
BCVA at Week 8 in Study Eye74437224
Difference in BCVA at Week 8 From Baseline in Fellow Eye04-65
Difference in BCVA at Week 8 From Baseline in Study Eye-34310

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Week 52 in Fellow Eye78656544
BCVA at Week 52 in Study Eye79476520
Difference in BCVA at Week 52 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-24-112
Difference in BCVA at Week 52 From Baseline in Study Eye28-46

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 5

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Week 5 in Fellow Eye82657545
BCVA at Week 5 in Study Eye7107226
Difference in BCVA at Week 5 From Baseline in Fellow Eye24-13
Difference in BCVA at Week 5 From Baseline in Study Eye-6-39312

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 2

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Week 2 in Fellow Eye78666742
BCVA at Week 2 in Study Eye7506623
Difference in BCVA at Week 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-25-90
Difference in BCVA at Week 2 From Baseline in Study Eye-2-39-39

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 3

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Day 3 in Fellow Eye78617347
BCVA at Day 3 in Study Eye81417423
Difference in BCVA at Day 3 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-20-35
Difference in BCVA at Day 3 From Baseline in Study Eye4259

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Day 2 in Fellow Eye81586945
BCVA at Day 2 in Study Eye75367521
Difference in BCVA at Day 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye1-3-73
Difference in BCVA at Day 2 From Baseline in Study Eye-2-367

[back to top]

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,,,
Interventionletters read (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
BCVA at Baseline in Fellow Eye80617642
BCVA at Baseline in Study Eye77396914
BCVA at Day 1 in Fellow Eye79627044
BCVA at Day 1 in Study Eye76327418
Difference in BCVA at Day 1 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-11-62
Difference in BCVA at Day 1 From Baseline in Study Eye-1-754

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Withdrew

The number of participants who withdrew early. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Study duration, up to 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interferon Gamma-1b0

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 2

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye269285784241.5
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye297.55977131393
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 2 in Fellow Eye267300700208
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 2 in Study Eye3305345171193
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Fellow Eye-215-84-33.5
Difference at Week 2 From Baseline in Study Eye32.5-63-196-200

[back to top]

Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,,,,
Interventionμm (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Fellow Eye278319745260
Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline in Study Eye3076197021413
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 8 in Fellow Eye280313657250
Central Retinal Thickness at Week 8 in Study Eye3705454861020
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Fellow Eye2-6-88-10
Difference at Week 8 From Baseline in Study Eye63-74-216-393

[back to top]

Change in Central Visual Field Sensitivity at Day 2 and Week 5 Compared to Baseline.

Change in central visual field sensitivity as measured by microperimetry testing at Day 2 and Week 5 compared to baseline in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 2 and Week 5

InterventiondB (Mean)
Day 2 Study EyeDay 2 Fellow EyeWeek 5 Study EyeWeek 5 Fellow Eye
Interferon Gamma-1b-0.3-1.4-1.1-1.7

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes. (NCT02338973)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,,,
Interventionmm^3 (Number)
Participant 001Participant 002Participant 003Participant 004
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Fellow Eye0.250.05-1.35-0.05
Difference at Day 1 From Baseline in Study Eye0.1-0.2-0.951.4
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Fellow Eye7.111.218.559.25
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Baseline in Study Eye7.2514.1516.136.3
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day 1 in Study Eye7.3513.9515.1537.7
Subretinal Fluid Volume at Day1 in Fellow Eye7.3511.2517.29.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL)

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: Treatment period (12 to 24 weeks) and after the end of treatment (12 to 24 weeks)

,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
Day 4Week 1Day 10Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 10Week 12Post-Treatment Week 4Post-Treatment Week 8Post-Treatment Week 12Post-Treatment Week 24
200 mg TG-2349-3.8-4.4-4.6-4.8-5.0-5.2-5.4-5.8-5.6-5.8-5.8-5.6-5.2-5.6
400 mg TG-2349-3.9-4.5-4.8-4.9-5.5-5.5-5.7-5.7-5.8-5.7-5.1-5.0-4.8-5.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response at 4, 8, and 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR4, SVR8, and SVR24)

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: 4, 8, 24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR4, 8, 24), after 12-week treatments

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SVR4SVR8SVR24
200 mg TG-2349121111
400 mg TG-2349101010

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure During Treatment and Viral Relapse After the End of Treatment.

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: Treatment period (12 to 24 weeks) and after the end of treatment (12 to 24 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Virologic failureOn-Treatment failurePost-Treatment relapse
200 mg TG-2349101
400 mg TG-2349211

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Baseline Who Achieved Normal Limit of ALT at Final Treatment Visit.

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: From baseline (day 1) to the final treatment visit (week 12 or week 24)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT > ULN at baselineALT normalization
200 mg TG-234972
400 mg TG-234975

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Achieving Sustained Viral Response at 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment.

Proportion of subjects with HCV RNA< LLOQ (lower limit of quantification), TD (target detected) or TND (target not detected) at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population, which include subjects with genotype 1b HCV infection who were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drugs. (NCT02340962)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), after 12-week treatments

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
200 mg TG-234911
400 mg TG-234910

[back to top]

Mean Absolute Values in HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL)

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: Treatment period (12 to 24 weeks) and after the end of treatment (12 to 24 weeks)

,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 4Week 1Day 10Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 10Week 12Post-Treatment Week 4Post-Treatment Week 8Post-Treatment Week 12Post-Treatment Week 24
200 mg TG-23495.81.91.41.21.00.70.50.40.00.20.00.00.20.50.1
400 mg TG-23495.92.01.41.11.00.40.40.10.10.00.10.80.91.00.0

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Achieving HCV RNA < LLOQ, TND

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: Treatment period (12 to 24 weeks) and after the end of treatment (12 to 24 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 4Week 1Day 10Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 10Week 12Post-Treatment Week 4Post-Treatment Week 8Post-Treatment Week 12Post-Treatment Week 24
Group I001024671191112111110
Group II0013499101011101010910

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Achieving HCV RNA < Lower Limit of Quantification, Target Detected or Target Not Detected (< LLOQ, TD or TND)

(NCT02340962)
Timeframe: The whole treatment period, 12 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 4Week 1Day 10Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 10Week 12
200 mg TG-234901369111211111111
400 mg TG-2349004810101111111111

[back to top]

Number of Children Responding to Treatment

The objective response of study participants was categorized as complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Determination of tumor response or progression is based on the pre-study baseline scan performed closest to time of study entry. The overall response assessment takes into account response in both target and non-target lesion, and the appearance of new lesions. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Partial response is defined as ≥ 65% decrease in the sum of the products of the three perpendicular diameters of all target lesions, and no development of new lesions. Stable disease is defined as neither sufficient decrease in the sum of the products of the three perpendicular diameters of all target lesions to qualify for partial response, nor sufficient increase in a single target lesion to qualify for progressive disease, as well as no new lesions. (NCT02343224)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
PEGINTRON005

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Event Free Survival Criteria

Event free survival is the time to treatment failure from the time of study enrollment to tumor progression, tumor recurrence, death from any cause or occurrence of a second malignant neoplasm. (NCT02343224)
Timeframe: Month 12, Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
PEGINTRON77

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Overall Survival Criteria

Overall survival is measured as the time from study enrollment to death from any cause. (NCT02343224)
Timeframe: Month 12, Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
PEGINTRON77

[back to top]

Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Incidence

Stage 1 (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious) Adverse EventsOther (Not Including Serious) Adverse EventsElevated erythrocyte sedimentation rateLeucopeniaLymphopeniaMonocytopeniaMonocytosisNeutropeniaPlasmatization of lymphocytesTrombocytopeniaVacuolation of cytoplasm of monocytesFeverFlu-like syndromeElevated ALTElevated ASTElevated gamma glutamil transferraseHyperemia of injection site
Avonex03030013000010000
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - IM06230022003061000
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - SC06160013120040003
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - IM03020012000030000
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - SC03020002020030001
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - IM03021022021120000
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - SC06064106060242214
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - IM03020022013010000
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - SC03020012013010001
Rebif06020005020040001

[back to top]

AUC (0-168); AUC (0-336); AUC (0-672); AUC (0-∞ ) of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a

Stage 1 primary outcome measure for pharmacokinetics analysis. Area under concentration-time curve (AUC) of interferon (IFN) beta-1a from the moment of drug administration up to 168, 336, 648 hours respectively (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 0 to 168 hours; 0 to 336 hours; 0 to 672 hours respectively

,,,,,,,,,
Intervention(pg/ml)*hour (Median)
AUC (0-168)AUC (0-336)AUC (0-672)AUC (0-∞ )
Avonex5995696475447544
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - IM176866196189196189196189
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - SC279477345510351768351768
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - IM420038437275437275437275
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - SC405395426025426025426025
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - IM376277407273410751410751
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - SC1052951145797315541731562327
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - IM87085103624107471107471
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - SC36682445694456944569
Rebif20423368665371554774

[back to top]

Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Incidence BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC/IM

Stage 2 BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC/IM (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsOther (Not Including Serious) Adverse EventsLeucopeniaNeutropeniaTrombocytopeniaFlu-like syndromeElevated ALTElevated ASTElevated creatinineHyperemia of injection site
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - IM0665342210
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC0845173301

[back to top]

AUC(0-last); AUC (0-∞ ) BCD-054 of Interferon (IFN) Beta-1a - 180 mcg - SC, BCD-054 - 180 mcg - IM

Stage 2 primary outcome measure for pharmacokinetics analysis. Area under concentration-time curve (AUC) of interferon (IFN) beta-1a from the moment of drug administration until last quantifiable concentration (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 0 to 672 hours

,
Intervention(pg/ml)*hour (Median)
AUC(0-last)AUC (0-∞)
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - IM210626218817
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC274888316204

[back to top]

AUC(0-∞), AUC(0-last) of Neopterin

Stage 2 primary outcome measure for pharmacodynamics analysis. Area under concentration-time curve (AUC) of neopterin from the moment of drug administration until last quantifiable concentration (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 0 to 672 hours

,
Intervention(nmol/L)*hour (Median)
AUC(0-∞)AUC(0-last)
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - IM34313242
BCD-054 - 180 mcg - SC37573303

[back to top]

AUC (0-168); AUC (0-336); AUC (0-672);AUC (0-∞ ) of Neopterin

Stage 1 primary outcome measure for pharmacodynamics analysis. Area under concentration-time curve (AUC) of neopterin from the moment of drug administration until 168, 336, 648 hours respectively (NCT02359877)
Timeframe: 0 to 168 hours; 0 to 336 hours; 0 to 672 hours respectively

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L*hour (Median)
AUC (0-168)AUC (0-336)AUC (0-672)AUC (0-∞ )
Avonex5995696475447544
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - IM176865196189196189196189
BCD-054 - 120 mcg - SC279477345509351767351767
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - IM420038437275437275437275
BCD-054 - 240 mcg - SC405394426024426024426024
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - IM376277407273410750410750
BCD-054 - 360 mcg - SC1052951145797215541731562327
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - IM87084103624107471107471
BCD-054 - 60 mcg - SC36681445694456944569
Rebif20423368655371454774

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale Score (FARStot)

The FARS assessment includes neurological signs that specifically reflect neural substrates affected in FA. Based on a neurological examination, bulbar, upper limb, lower limb, peripheral nerve, and upright stability/gait functions are assessed. FARStot scores range from 0 (normal) to 125 (most impairment). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02415127)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon γ-1b-0.2
Placebo-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)-mNeuro Score

The FARS assessment includes neurological signs that specifically reflect neural substrates affected in FA. Based on a neurological examination, bulbar, upper limb, lower limb, peripheral nerve, and upright stability/gait functions were assessed. The FARS-mNeuro score excludes the peripheral nervous system subscale score and the facial and tongue atrophy and fasciculations from the bulbar subscale score. Scores range from 0 (normal) to 93 (most impairment). A negative change from baseline is an improvement. (NCT02415127)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon γ-1b-0.6
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score

Participants and/or their caregivers rated 9 areas of daily living skills (speech, swallowing, cutting food and handling utensils, dressing, personal hygiene, falling, walking, quality of sitting position, and bladder function) on a 5-point scale (0=normal, 4=greatest loss of function) with allowable increments of 0.5 if the participant or caregiver strongly felt that a task falls between 2 scores. ADL scores can range from 0 (normal) to 36 (greatest loss of function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02415127)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interferon γ-1b0.64
Placebo0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)

The T25FW is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. Participants are directed to 1 end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The task is immediately administered again by having the participant walk back the same distance, and the score for the test is the average of the 2 walks (after reciprocal transformation). Participants may use assistive devices when performing this task, with the same assistive device used at each assessment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02415127)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Intervention1/seconds (Mean)
Interferon γ-1b-0.006
Placebo-0.003

[back to top]

Improvement in Quantitative Serum HDV RNA Levels After 4-12 Weeks of Lonafarnib-based Therapy

log HDV RNA decline from baseline to end of treatment (4-12 weeks of lonafarnib-based therapy) (NCT02430181)
Timeframe: 4-12 weeks

Interventionlog IU/mL (Mean)
Lonafarnib 200 mg BID0.03
Lonafarnib 300 mg BID-1.78
Lonafarnib 100 mg TID-1.3
100 mg BID Lonafarnib/PEG IFN-a-1.85
200 mg BID Lonafarnib/PEG IFN-a0
300 mg BID Lonafarnib/PEG IFN-a0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir-1.2

[back to top]

ALT Normalization at End of Treatment

Proportion of intent to treat population who normalize ALT at end of treatment (NCT02430194)
Timeframe: 12-48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - I3
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - II1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - III1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - IV2
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - V0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VI2
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VII6
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - VIII0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - IX5
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - X2

[back to top]

< LLOQ in HDV RNA at End of Treatment (EOT)

Proportion of intent to treat patients with HDV RNA below the limit of quantitation at end of treatment (NCT02430194)
Timeframe: 12-48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - I0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - II1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - III1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - IV0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - V1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VI0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VII6
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - VIII1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - IX3
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - X2

[back to top]

≥2 log10 Decline of HDV RNA From Baseline at End of Treatment (EOT)

Proportion of intent to treat patients with ≥2 log10 decline of HDV RNA from baseline at end of treatment (EOT) (NCT02430194)
Timeframe: 12-48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - I1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - II0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - III1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - IV0
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - V1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VI1
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VII5
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - VIII4
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - IX3
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - X4

[back to top]

Mean HDV RNA Decline

mean HDV RNA decline of intent to treat population from baseline to end of treatment (NCT02430194)
Timeframe: 12-48 weeks

Interventionlog HDV RNA IU/mL (Mean)
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - I-1.39
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - II0.33
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - III-1.11
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - IV-0.67
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - V-1.97
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VI-0.31
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir - VII-1.94
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - VIII-2.85
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - IX-2.69
Lonafarnib/Ritonavir/PEG IFN-a - X-3.81

[back to top]

AUC for Change in the Evening PEF From Baseline to up to 30 Days

"Patients measured evening PEF at home and recorded the results using the ePRO device. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The mean AUC for change from baseline is presented for the periods Days 1-14, 1-7, 8-14 and 15-30." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
Interventionl/min (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-14Days 1-7Days 8-14Days 15-30
AZD941210.968.788.4911.88
Placebo-0.73-2.41-2.66-5.25

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Severe Asthma Exacerbations Within 7 and 30 Days Following Randomisation

"Evaluation of the efficacy of inhaled AZD9412 compared to placebo in preventing severe exacerbations within 7 and 30 days after the start of treatment (Day 1).~A severe exacerbation was defined as worsening asthma symptoms and~use of systemic corticosteroids (or a temporary increase of at least 2-fold in a stable oral corticosteroid background dose) for at least 3 consecutive days and/or~an unscheduled visit or emergency room visit due to asthma symptoms that required at least 1 dose of systemic corticosteroids and/or~an in-patient hospitalisation due to asthma requiring at least 1 dose of systemic corticosteroids.~The numbers of patients with severe asthma exacerbations with onset during Days 1 - 7 and Days 1 - 30 are presented for each treatment group." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: Day 1 of treatment phase up to 30 days post-randomisation.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Days 1 - 7Days 1 - 30
AZD941248
Placebo26

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Moderate Asthma Exacerbation Within 7, 14 and 30 Days Following Randomisation

"Evaluation of the efficacy of inhaled AZD9412 compared to placebo in preventing moderate exacerbations within 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of treatment (Day 1).~A moderate exacerbation was defined as a temporary increase in maintenance therapy in order to prevent a severe event supported by a sustained (2 or more days) worsening in at least one key control metric, including asthma score, rescue use, night time awakening or morning peak expiratory flow.~The numbers of patients with moderate exacerbations with onset during Days 1 - 7, Days 1 - 14 and Days 1 - 30 are presented for each treatment group.~With respect to the Day 1-7 analysis, the model did not converge so the analysis could not be performed." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: Day 1 of treatment phase up to 30 days post-randomisation.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Days 1 - 7Days 1 - 14Days 1 - 30
AZD9412011
Placebo111

[back to top]

AUC for Change in the Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline up to 30 Days

"Patients measured morning FEV1 at home and recorded the results using the ePRO device. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The mean AUC for change from baseline is presented for the periods Days 1-14, 1-7, 8-14 and 15-30." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
Interventionlitres (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-14Days 1-7Days 8-14Days 15-30
AZD9412-0.000.10-0.030.15
Placebo-0.080.02-0.090.04

[back to top]

AUC for Change in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) From Baseline to up to 30 Days

"Patients measured morning PEF at home and recorded the results using the ePRO device. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The mean AUC for change from baseline is presented for the periods Days 1-14, 1-7, 8-14 and 15-30." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
Interventionlitres/minute (l/min) (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-14Days 1-7Days 8-14Days 15-30
AZD94129.5619.667.0332.75
Placebo-7.420.31-7.3513.49

[back to top]

Change in Asthma Control From Baseline up to 30 Days as Measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6)

"The ACQ-6 consists of 6 questions to assess asthma control, each question measured on a 7-point scale scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The ACQ-6 total score is computed as the un-weighted mean of the responses to the 6 questions. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The change from baseline at Visit 4 (Day 7 +/- 1), at Visit 6 (Day 14 +/- 1) and at Visit 8 (Day 30) is presented for the total score and for each of the 6 questions." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
ACQ-6 Total Score, Visit 4ACQ-6 Total Score, Visit 6ACQ-6 Total Score, Visit 8Q1: Woken by Asthma, Visit 4Q1: Woken by Asthma, Visit 6Q1: Woken by Asthma, Visit 8Q2: Symptoms at Awakening, Visit 4Q2: Symptoms at Awakening, Visit 6Q2: Symptoms at Awakening, Visit 8Q3: Limited in Activities, Visit 4Q3: Limited in Activities, Visit 6Q3: Limited in Activities, Visit 8Q4: Shortness of Breath, Visit 4Q4: Shortness of Breath, Visit 6Q4: Shortness of Breath, Visit 8Q5: Wheeze, Visit 4Q5: Wheeze, Visit 6Q5: Wheeze, Visit 8Q6: Puffs of Short-Acting Bronchodilator; Visit 4Q6: Puffs of Short-Acting Bronchodilator; Visit 6Q6: Puffs of Short-Acting Bronchodilator; Visit 8
AZD94120.02-0.15-0.420.090.15-0.500.06-0.40-0.760.04-0.12-0.43-0.13-0.34-0.460.13-0.17-0.330.060.070.04
Placebo-0.07-0.21-0.35-0.09-0.28-0.32-0.17-0.33-0.470.060.16-0.33-0.11-0.38-0.370.08-0.17-0.420.00-0.11-0.03

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in the Proportion of Night-time Awakening Using the ePRO Questionnaire From Baseline up to 30 Days

"Night-time awakenings due to asthma symptoms were recorded by the patient in the Asthma Daily Diary each morning by answering the question whether he/she woke up during the night due to asthma symptoms with a 'yes' or 'no' response.~Biweekly means were calculated as the percentages of times the subject answered 'yes' over a period of 14 sequential days. Biweekly means are presented for the periods over Days 2-15 and Days 16-30." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
InterventionPercentage of 'yes' responses (Mean)
Days 2-15Days 16-30
AZD941222.315.2
Placebo24.815.9

[back to top]

AUC for Change in Daytime and Night-time Reliever Medication Use From Baseline up to 14 Days

"Patients recorded the number of reliever medication inhalations taken twice daily in the Asthma Daily Diary. The number of inhalations taken between the morning and evening lung function assessments were recorded in the evening. The number of inhalations taken between the evening and morning lung function assessments were recorded in the morning. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The AUC for change from baseline over Days 1-14 (inclusive of Days 1 and 14) is presented." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to Day 14 of treatment phase.

InterventionInhalations (Least Squares Mean)
AZD9412-0.12
Placebo-0.67

[back to top]

Duration of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations

"The duration of each individual moderate or severe exacerbation was calculated as:~Cessation date of exacerbation - Start date of exacerbation + 1.~The start date of a severe exacerbation was defined as the start date of systemic corticosteroids or increase of systemic corticosteroids or emergency room visit or hospital admission, whichever occurred first. The stop date was defined as the last day of systemic corticosteroids/increase of systemic corticosteroids or hospital discharge, whichever occurred last.~The start date of a moderate exacerbation was defined as the first day of increase in temporary maintenance therapy. The stop date was defined as the last day of this treatment.~The mean duration of moderate or severe exacerbations is presented for each treatment group." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: Day 1 of treatment phase up to 30 days post-randomisation.

InterventionDays (Mean)
AZD941210
Placebo8

[back to top]

AUC for Change in the Evening FEV1 From Baseline up to 30 Days

"Patients measured evening FEV1 at home and recorded the results using the ePRO device. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation.~The mean AUC for change from baseline is presented for the periods Days 1-14, 1-7, 8-14 and 15-30." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
Interventionlitres (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-14Days 1-7Days 8-14Days 15-30
AZD9412-0.010.01-0.020.02
Placebo-0.07-0.03-0.08-0.08

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With a Severe Asthma Exacerbation During 14 Days of Treatment

"Evaluation of the efficacy of inhaled AZD9412 compared to placebo in preventing severe exacerbations during the 14 day treatment phase following the onset of an URTI in asthmatic patients.~A severe exacerbation was defined as worsening asthma symptoms and~use of systemic corticosteroids (or a temporary increase of at least 2-fold in a stable oral corticosteroid background dose) for at least 3 consecutive days and/or~an unscheduled visit or emergency room visit due to asthma symptoms that required at least 1 dose of systemic corticosteroids and/or~an in-patient hospitalisation due to asthma requiring at least 1 dose of systemic corticosteroids.~The number of patients with severe asthma exacerbations with onset during the treatment phase is presented for each treatment group." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: Day 1 - 14 of the treatment phase.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AZD94127
Placebo5

[back to top]

Time to First Moderate Asthma Exacerbation During 30 Days Following Randomisation

"The time to first event was calculated as start date of events - date of randomisation + 1.~Patients with no observed event were censored at the date of their last visit, or for lost-to-follow-up patients, at the last time point after which an event could not be assessed.~The median time to first exacerbation was not calculated in either treatment group due to low numbers of events." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment phase up to 30 days post-randomisation.

InterventionDays (Median)
AZD9412NA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation During 30 Days Following Randomisation

"The time to first event was calculated as start date of events - date of randomisation + 1.~Patients with no observed event were censored at the date of their last visit, or for lost-to-follow-up patients, at the last time point after which an event could not be assessed.~The median time to first exacerbation was not calculated in either treatment group due to low numbers of events." (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment phase up to 30 days post-randomisation.

InterventionDays (Median)
AZD9412NA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

AUC for Change in Daytime and Night-time Asthma Symptom Score From Baseline up to 30 Days

Asthma symptoms during night-time and daytime were recorded by the patient each morning and evening in the Asthma Daily Diary on a daily basis. Symptoms were recorded using a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 indicates no asthma symptoms up to an absolute score of 3. Baseline assessments were taken as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomisation. The total daily asthma symptom score was calculated by taking the sum of the night-time and daytime asthma scores recorded each day. The outcome variable is the area under the curve (AUC) for change from baseline in day-time, night-time and total daily asthma symptom scores over Days 1-14, Days 1-7, Days 8-14 and Days 15-30. (NCT02491684)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 30 days after start of treatment phase.

,
InterventionUnits on Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Total asthma score, Days 1-14Total asthma score, Days 1-7Total asthma score, Days 8-14Total asthma score, Days 15-30Daytime asthma score, Days 1-14Daytime asthma score, Days 1-7Daytime asthma score, Days 8-14Daytime asthma score, Days 15-30Night-time asthma score, Days 1-14Night-time asthma score, Days 1-7Night-time asthma score, Days 8-14Night-time asthma score, Days 15-30
AZD9412-0.20-0.11-0.40-0.77-0.22-0.17-0.23-0.44-0.17-0.10-0.20-0.44
Placebo-0.31-0.22-0.41-0.77-0.26-0.17-0.27-0.41-0.16-0.09-0.17-0.39

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Resistance

Change in insulin resistance while on treatment by the homeostasis model assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). HOMA-IR is calculated according to the formula (fasting insulin (microU/L)+fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5. Fasting insulin and glucose measurements are obtained using whole blood. (NCT02541409)
Timeframe: Difference from entry to 24 weeks for SOF+PEG+RBV and difference from entry to 36 weeks for SOF+RBV

InterventionHOMA-IR (Median)
SOF+PEG+RBV1.2
SOF+RBV0.2

[back to top]

HCV Treatment Completion

The percentage of subjects that complete their course of treatment (NCT02541409)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from baseline for SOF+PEG+RBV and 24 weeks from baselne for SOF+RBV

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+PEG+RBV22
SOF+RBV22

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events

Number of participants with treatment-related serious adverse events by laboratory tests and physician examination (NCT02541409)
Timeframe: 24 weeks from baseline SOF+PEG+RBV and 36 weeks from baseline for SOF+RBV

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+PEG+RBV0
SOF+RBV0

[back to top]

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

The percentage of participants who achieve SVR as assessed by undetectable HCV RNA measured 12 weeks after treatment completion (NCT02541409)
Timeframe: 24 weeks from baseline for SOF+PEG+RBV and 36 weeks from baseline for SOF+RBV

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+PEG+RBV22
SOF+RBV15

[back to top] [back to top]

Count of Participants Who Displayed Persistence of Transferred T Cells in Blood and Tumor (Group Co2)

Persistence of trasferred T cells was evaluated and assessed after 90 days. Patients were counted if transferred T cells were detected beyond 90 days. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 90 days post infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)4

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Displayed Evidence of Epitope Spreading

Quantification of the overall recognition of the MCPyV T-antigen for each patient will likely be performed by testing the reactivity of whole peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) before and at indicated timepoints after treatment to peptides 15 amino acids (aa) in length offset by 5 aa bases spanning the whole T-antigen protein to include both CD8 and CD4 responses regardless of the HLA type of the patient. Due to changes in assay technology, epitope spreading was detected using a flow cytometric based intracellular cytokine assay. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)2

[back to top]

Count of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events, Evaluated According to the Current Guidelines in National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria Version 4.0

Evidence and nature of toxicity related to the treatment will be assessed and compared between groups. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks after the last infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 (Avelumab and MHC Class I Up-regulation)1
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)6

[back to top]

Evidence of Response, Based on Median Time to New Metastasis

Median time to new metastases reported for each group below. Group 1 result is NA, patient had no new detectable metastases in study follow-up period. Arm I is not analyzed because the one patient in Arm I did not experience new metastasis in their followup period, so they are not evaluable. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionDays (Median)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)53

[back to top]

Functional Capacity of Transferred T Cells (Group 2)

To evaluate the direct ex vivo function of the transferred cells, where possible, tetramer+ cells within collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will be evaluated for production of intracellular cytokines including interferon (IFN), tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-2 in response to cognate antigen using an intracellular cytokine assay. This endpoint was evaluable in 4 of 7 patients, all 4 of whom upregulated interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-2 expression in response to cognate antigen using intracellular cytokine assay. Persistence was not detected for 3 out of 7 patients in group 2, making them unevaluable for functional capacity. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)4

[back to top]

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC)-Specific Survival

Survival status in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma will be evaluated. Data is reported as count of participants that survived past the 1 year follow up period. (NCT02584829)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 (Avelumab and MHC Class I Up-regulation)1
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Abnormal Laboratory Values

Participants with clinical abnormal laboratory values were reported throughout the studies. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineWeek 12Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg433

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Adherence to Study Treatment at Weeks 12 and 24

Adherence to treatment was evaluated using a questionnaire assessing adherence and the reasons for not taking drug at the recommended frequency of administration. Participants who had taken the prescribed doses of treatment in the previous 28 days were evaluated. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg1136553

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score at Week 12 and 24

MusiQoL is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 31 items describing nine dimensions of health-related quality of life (QoL): activities of daily living, psychological wellbeing, symptoms, relationship with friends, relationship with family, sentimental and sexual life, coping rejection, relationship with healthcare system). All items are scored based on frequency/extent of an event on a five-point scale ranging from never/not at all (option 1) to always/very much (option 5). Total score is obtained by linearly transforming and standardizing on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate a better level of health-related QoL for each dimension and for the global index score. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MusiQoL score from baseline. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg67.84.65.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Status Scale (FSS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

FSS is a questionnaire composed of nine statements on the state of fatigue experienced during the previous week. The answers are within a scale of agreement ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 represents less fatigue and 7 indicates highest fatigue. The total score was obtained summing the number given at each item and it ranges from 7 to 63. An overall score of ≥36 indicates a state of fatigue. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in FSS score from baseline. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg40.1-4.6-3.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AE Stratified by Severity

Severity of AEs was evaluated based on the following criteria- Mild: Symptoms barely noticeable to participant or does not make participant uncomfortable; does not influence performance or functioning; prescription drug not ordinarily needed for relief of symptom(s) but may be given because of personality of participant. Moderate: Symptoms of a sufficient severity to make participant uncomfortable; performance of daily activity is influenced; participant is able to continue in study; treatment for symptom(s) may be needed. Severe: Symptoms cause severe discomfort; symptoms cause incapacitation or significant impact on participant's daily life; severity may cause cessation of treatment with study treatment; treatment for symptom(s) may be given and/or participant hospitalized. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MildModerate
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg5527

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12

TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg38.538.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24

Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. ARR was calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment. Here negative sign indicates decrease in annual relapse rate as compared to baseline. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionrelapses per participant-year (Number)
BaselineChange at Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg0.15-0.03

[back to top]

Percent Change in Relapse-Free Participants at Week 24

Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. Percent change in relapse-free participants had been calculated with respect to the number of relapse-free participants at baseline. Here, negative sign indicates decrease in number of relapse free participants at specified timepoint as compared to baseline. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage change (Number)
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg-7.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Score of All Domains of TSQM-9 at Week 24

TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: Convenience SatisfactionChange at Week 24: Convenience SatisfactionBaseline: EffectivenessChange at Week 24: EffectivenessBaseline: Global satisfactionChange at Week 24: Global satisfaction
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg38.541.947.021.241.427.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can herefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adapted Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire (MSTCQ) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

MSTCQ is a 20-item questionnaire adapted for 'Peg-interferon Beta 1a' containing two domains: injection system satisfaction (1-9) and side effects (1-11). All questions in the MSTCQ have a five-point response choice, with a minimum possible total score of 20 and a maximum possible total score of 100. Lower total scores indicating better outcomes. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant I-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MSTCQ score from baseline. (NCT02587065)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 24
Peg-interferon Beta-1a 125 μg71.9-16.8-19.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive/Negative Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) and Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Tests

NAb testing only for those participants with a positive ADA test. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing measurement/assessment on the date of Week 26 Visit from study HZNP-ACT-301 (NCT02415127). If this measurement was missing or otherwise unavailable, it was the last non-missing measurement/assessment on or prior to first dose in this study. If the participant discontinued the study, then premature withdrawal assessments were mapped to the nearest scheduled visit based on schedule of the assessment and the study day. If the mapped visit was already available then the visit was mapped to the next schedule visit. Last on study assessment is the last non-missing post-baseline assessment for each participant. (NCT02593773)
Timeframe: Baseline/Day 1 (Week 26 of Study HZNP-ACT-301 [NCT02415127]), Week 4, Week 13, Week 26, and Week 28 (follow-up safety visit)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline ADA = negativeBaseline ADA = positiveBaseline NAb = negativeBaseline NAb = positiveWeek 4 ADA = negativeWeek 4 ADA = positiveWeek 13 ADA = negativeWeek 13 ADA = positiveWeek 26 ADA = negativeWeek 26 ADA = positiveWeek 28 (Follow-up) ADA = negativeWeek 28 (Follow-up) ADA = positiveLast On Study Assessment ADA = negativeLast On Study Assessment ADA = positive
Interferon γ-1b85110840790640560850

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, whether or not the event is considered related to the investigational product. A TEAE is any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, including any laboratory test value abnormality judged as clinically significant by the investigator, that occurs on or after the date of the first dose of study drug administered at home and throughout the duration of the clinical study, whether the adverse event is considered related to the treatment or not. An SAE is an AE that results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or other medically important event. (NCT02593773)
Timeframe: Baseline/Day 1 (Week 26 of Study HZNP-ACT-301 [NCT02415127]) through Week 28 (follow-up safety visit)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 Related TEAE≥ 1 SAE≥ 1 Related SAE≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Interferon γ-1b78614011

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Number of ICU-free Days

Number of Intensive Care Unit free days up to Day 28, i.e. the patient is no longer receiving care in ICU. Patients who die during this period have been assigned a value of zero for the number of ICU care free days. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg6
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Vasoactive Support

"Days without vasoactive support. The vasoactive support included catecholamine and non-catecholamine vasopressors, inotropes and vasodilating agents.~Overall, the median number of days free of vasoactive support was 20 days in the active group and 21 days in the placebo group." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg20
Placebo21

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Renal Support

Days without renal support (any renal support was documented). Overall, the median number of days free of renal support was 28 days in the active group and 27 days in the placebo group. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg28
Placebo27

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Days Free of Organ Failure

The total number of days free of organ failure by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) methodology. Overall, the median number of days free of organ failure was 0 days in both the treatment groups. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28 or last day in intensive care unit [ICU] if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation

"The total number of days free of mechanical ventilation has been derived from the Patient Status report recorded on each day during the 28-day period. Patients who died during this period have been assigned a value of zero. This variable differs from the calculated Ventilation Free Days (VFD) endpoint, which contribute to the VDFsurv primary efficacy endpoint as it require additional conditions of unassisted breathing (UAB) to be met." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg10
Placebo9

[back to top]

Neurological Functioning (6MWT) at Extended Long-term Follow-up

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. According to the ERS/ATS technical standard to which the 6MWT was done, the walk test is done twice and the best result is used. It is an evaluation of the global and integrated responses of all systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood and neuromuscular units and muscle metabolism. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the sub- maximal level of functional capacity and will better reflect the functional exercise level for daily activities. ANOVA parameters estimates (LS Means and 90 % confidence intervals) for the overall treatment difference was analysed. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 360

Interventionmaximal distance walked (meters) (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg475
Placebo453

[back to top]

Long-term Efficacy Endpoints Relating to Respiratory Functioning (FEV1)

Measuring FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) assessed pulmonary function (airway obstruction, bronchoconstriction or bronchodilation). FEV1 is the volume exhaled during the first second of a forced expiratory manoeuvre, starting from the level of total lung capacity. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 180

Intervention%FEV1 (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg81.2
Placebo79.5

[back to top]

Long-term Efficacy Endpoints Relating to Neurological Functioning (6MWT)

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. According to the ERS/ATS technical standard to which the 6MWT was done, the walk test is done twice and the best result is used. It is an evaluation of the global and integrated responses of all systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood and neuromuscular units and muscle metabolism. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the sub- maximal level of functional capacity and will better reflect the functional exercise level for daily activities. ANOVA parameters estimates (LS Means and 90 % conf.interval) for the overall treatment difference was analysed. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionmaximum distance walked (meters) (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg449
Placebo424

[back to top]

Long-term Efficacy Endpoint: Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Day 180

Quality of Life was assessed through EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels questionnaire). An EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) total score (ranging from 0-100) was measured (0= Worst imaginable health state, 100= Best imaginable health state). The EQ-5D-3L VAS scores are numerically summarised as change from pre-dose (Day 1) to long term follow-up (Day 180 visit). (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to Day 180

Interventionchange score on a scale (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg-10
Placebo-5

[back to top]

Extended Long-term Follow-up Exploratory Endpoint: Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Day 360

Quality of Life was assessed through EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels questionnaire). An EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) total score (ranging from 0-100) was measured (0= Worst imaginable health state, 100= Best imaginable health state). The EQ-5D-3L VAS scores are numerically summarised as change from pre-dose (Day 1) to extended long term follow-up (Day 360 visit). (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to Day 360

Interventionchange score on a scale (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Extended Long-term Follow-up Endpoint: Respiratory Functioning (FEV1) at Day 360

Measuring FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) assessed pulmonary function (airway obstruction, bronchoconstriction or bronchodilation). FEV1 is the volume exhaled during the first second of a forced expiratory manoeuvre, starting from the level of total lung capacity. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 360

Intervention%FEV1 (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg69.4
Placebo72.0

[back to top]

Exploratory, Extended Long-term Follow-up: Overall Mortality at Day 360

Fatalities; as the study was terminated early, the assessment time point for mortality at Day 360 was not reached. Therefore only the overall mortality at study termination is presented. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 360 /termination of study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg51
Placebo53

[back to top]

Efficacy Endpoint: Mortality in Hospital

This is the number of subjects who died in hospital (i.e. outside of Intensive Care Units) up to Day 28. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg1
Placebo0

[back to top]

Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Number of Days in Hospital

Hospitalisation days (including the stay at Intensive Care Units). Patients who died during this period have been assigned a value of 28 for the number of days in ICU or in hospital. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg28
Placebo28

[back to top]

Efficacy Endpoint: Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic (PD) Using Myxovirus Resistance Protein A (MxA) Biomarker

Evaluation of MxA biomarker change from baseline to D14 between treatments arms over time. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 14

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg31.8
Placebo7.8

[back to top]

Efficacy Endpoint: All-cause Mortality

Fatalities, mortality all-causes from randomisation up to Day 28 (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: At Day 28

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg26.4
Placebo23

[back to top]

Composite Endpoint (VFDsurv; All-cause Mortality and Number of Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation) at Day 28

VFDsurv is a composite measure of all-cause mortality and the number of days free of mechanical ventilation (VFDsurv) within 28 days among survivors. Ventilator-free days (VFDs) correspond to those days when unassisted breathing (UAB) was possible for a complete calendar day. UAB was defined as: spontaneously breathing with face mask, nasal prong oxygen or room air, T-piece breathing, tracheostomy mask breathing, CPAP less than or equal to 5 cmH2O without pressure support or intermittent mandatory ventilation assistance, use of CPAP or BIPAP solely for sleep apnoea management. A patient was reported as ventilator-free after 2 consecutive calendar days of unassisted breathing (a VFD value of 0 is assigned to patients who die without initiating UAB or who require more than 28 days of mechanical ventilation. All patients who die before Day28 are assigned a VFDsurv value of -1). (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionDays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg10
Placebo8.5

[back to top]

Change in the Treatment-specific Exploratory Biomarker Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73) Concentration

Evaluation of Cluster of differentiation 73 (CD73) change from baseline to D14 between treatments arms over time. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 14

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg6.2
Placebo6.1

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Physical Examination

"Physical examination data (covering the major body systems; general appearance, head [ear, nose and throat], cardiovascular, eyes, respiratory, abdomen, urogenital, musculoskeletal, neurological, lymph nodes and skin) were categorized as normal; abnormal, not clinically significant; abnormal, clinically significant or not done. Physical examinations were performed at Screening, then at the Last day in ICU and Day 28 (Out of ICU) or Early Termination, from which the last observation performed is derived. The changes from baseline to the last observations performed are categorized as no change, change clinically significant; change not clinically significant, not done." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Last Observation Performed (D28 or last day in ICU if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28, or at withdrawal)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
General Appearance72565994General Appearance72565991Ear, Nose and Throat72565994Ear, Nose and Throat72565991Eyes72565991Eyes72565994Respiratory72565991Respiratory72565994Abdomen72565994Abdomen72565991Urogenital72565994Urogenital72565991Musculoskeletal72565991Musculoskeletal72565994Neurological72565991Neurological72565994Lymph nodes72565991Lymph nodes72565994Skin72565991Skin72565994Cardiovascular72565994Cardiovascular72565991
No changeChange, Not Clinically SignificantNot available/pt diedNot doneChange, Clinically Significant
Placebo66
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg8
Placebo9
Placebo8
Placebo34
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg67
Placebo75
Placebo1
Placebo6
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg34
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg70
Placebo76
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg1
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg2
Placebo3
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg35
Placebo36
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg27
Placebo30
Placebo28
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg21
Placebo26
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg30
Placebo33
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg36
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg65
Placebo70
Placebo2
Placebo10
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg31
Placebo72
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg6
Placebo4
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg32
Placebo38
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg59
Placebo63
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg11
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg5
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg33
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg49
Placebo55
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg18
Placebo14
Placebo13
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg69
Placebo78
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg0
Placebo0
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg39
Placebo39
Placebo35
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg64
Placebo64
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg3
Placebo37
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg56
Placebo60
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg9
Placebo12
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg38

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Laboratory Results

Laboratory safety assessments of biochemistry, haematology and urinalysis were performed daily during the stay at ICU. Laboratory data were classified according to normal ranges as out of range (OOR; not clinically significant), OOR (clinically significant), or OOR (clinically significant and an AE). Laboratory test results were summarised by actual results by baseline and last observation period. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28 (or last day in ICU if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28, or at withdrawal)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haemoglobin, Pre-Dose72565991Haemoglobin, Pre-Dose72565992Haemoglobin, LOP72565992Haemoglobin, LOP72565991Platelets, Pre-Dose72565991Platelets, Pre-Dose72565992Platelets, LOP72565991Platelets, LOP72565992Leucocytes, Pre-Dose72565991Leucocytes, Pre-Dose72565992Leucocytes, LOP72565991Leucocytes, LOP72565992Albumin, Pre-Dose72565991Albumin, Pre-Dose72565992Albumin, LOP72565991Albumin, LOP72565992Creatine Kinase, Pre-Dose72565992Creatine Kinase, Pre-Dose72565991Creatine Kinase, LOP72565992Creatine Kinase, LOP72565991Creatinine, Pre-Dose72565992Creatinine, Pre-Dose72565991Creatinine, LOP72565991Creatinine, LOP72565992Glucose, Pre-Dose72565992Glucose, Pre-Dose72565991Glucose, LOP72565992Glucose, LOP72565991Bilirubin, Pre-Dose72565991Bilirubin, Pre-Dose72565992Bilirubin, LOP72565991Bilirubin, LOP72565992AST, Pre-Dose72565991AST, Pre-Dose72565992AST, LOP72565992AST, LOP72565991ALT, Pre-Dose72565992ALT, Pre-Dose72565991ALT, LOP72565991ALT, LOP72565992Bicarbonate, Pre-Dose72565992Bicarbonate, Pre-Dose72565991Bicarbonate, LOP72565991Bicarbonate, LOP72565992Urine Protein, Pre-Dose72565991Urine Protein, Pre-Dose72565992Urine Protein, LOP72565991Urine Protein, LOP72565992Urine Glucose, Pre-Dose72565991Urine Glucose, Pre-Dose72565992Urine Glucose, LOP72565991Urine Glucose, LOP72565992Urine Blood, Pre-Dose72565991Urine Blood, Pre-Dose72565992Urine Blood, LOP72565991Urine Blood, LOP72565992
OOR (NCS)OOR (CS)OOR (CS+AE)Not available/pt diedNormal
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg22
Placebo30
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg103
Placebo107
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg19
Placebo14
Placebo0
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg17
Placebo18
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg100
Placebo117
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg23
Placebo16
Placebo1
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg85
Placebo91
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg43
Placebo42
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg16
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg76
Placebo65
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg52
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg10
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg5
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg1
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg40
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg72
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg32
Placebo36
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg0
Placebo57
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg15
Placebo21
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg3
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg2
Placebo17
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg83
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg24
Placebo15
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg26
Placebo25
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg97
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg59
Placebo62
Placebo45
Placebo11
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg33
Placebo34
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg82
Placebo93
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg45
Placebo8
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg4
Placebo6
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg78
Placebo72
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg41
Placebo50
Placebo28
Placebo2
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg69
Placebo73
Placebo64
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg13
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg56
Placebo53
Placebo85
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg11
Placebo10
Placebo4
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg65
Placebo74
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg71
Placebo75
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg7
Placebo3
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg88
Placebo106
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg37
Placebo33
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg9
Placebo7
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg114
Placebo121
Placebo23
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg6
Placebo5
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg57
Placebo52
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg50
Placebo70
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg18
Placebo76
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg54
Placebo56
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg86
Placebo92
Placebo43
Placebo9
Placebo46
Placebo12
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg90
Placebo97
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg44
Placebo47
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg8
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg89
Placebo105
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg47
Placebo41
Placebo54
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg67
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg20
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg66
Placebo84
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg63
Placebo123
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg21
Placebo19
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg128
Placebo135
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg48
Placebo58
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg73
Placebo77

[back to top]

Efficacy Endpoint: Mortality in ICU

All-cause mortality for subjects who died in Intensive Care Units up to Day 28. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg25.7
Placebo23.0

[back to top]

Post-Hoc Analyses Related to the Use of Concomitant Glucocorticoids Medications and Mortality at D28

The overall use of concomitant glucocorticoids treatment in both study treatment groups (active and placebo) were analysed. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Day 28

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Use of concomitant glucocorticoidsMortality, with concomitant glucocorticoidsMortality, without concomitant glucocorticoids
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg54.139.710.6
Placebo64.527.614.8

[back to top]

Pharmacogenetic Analysis

An optional genetic sample was analysed for subjects based on a separate consent. A carrier frequency was analysed for a C/T polymorphism (rs9984723) located in the 3'PRIME_UTR/intron region of IFNAR2-gene, which encodes the beta chain for the IFN-alpha/beta receptor and encompasses a regulatory motif for the glucocorticoid receptor. Biomarker responders were defined by a 3-fold elevation in MxA and a 2-fold in CD73 in comparison to baseline. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Anytime from baseline to Day 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
C-allele carrierC-allele non-carrier
Biomarker Non-responder2647
Biomarker Responder2112

[back to top]

Exploratory Variables Relating to Efficacy: Composite Endpoint (Mortality and Days Free of Mechanical Ventilation) at Day 90

Composite endpoint including mortality and days free of mechanical ventilation (VFDsurv) within 90 days among survivors. Ventilation Free Survival at Day 90 has been classified as Dead, Alive but on a ventilator and Alive and breathing unassisted (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Within 90 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeadAlive-on ventilatorAlive-breathing unassisted
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg47690
Placebo481091

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Heart Rate

"Vital signs were measured supine pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and daily up to Day 28 while the patient was in the ICU. The results at baseline and at last observation performed (LOP) were summarized overall by treatment, variable and time point.~No statistical analyses were made for vital signs." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Last Observation Performed (Day 28 or last day in ICU if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28, or at withdrawal)

,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Heart Rate, bpm : Pre-DoseHeart Rate, bpm : LOP
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg93.492.5
Placebo94.892.7

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Body Temperature

"Vital signs were measured supine pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and daily up to Day 28 while the patient was in the ICU. The results at baseline and at last observation performed (LOP) were summarized overall by treatment, variable and time point.~No statistical analyses were made for vital signs." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Last Observation Performed (Day 28 or last day in ICU if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28, or at withdrawal)

,
Interventiondegrees Celsius (Mean)
Body Temperature, degrees C : Pre-DoseBody Temperature, degrees C : LOP
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg37.136.9
Placebo37.236.8

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Vital Signs - Blood Pressure

"Vital signs were measured supine pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and daily up to Day 28 while the patient was in the ICU. The results at baseline and at last observation performed (LOP) were summarized overall by treatment, variable and time point.~No statistical analyses were made for vital signs." (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Last Observation Performed (Day 28 or last day in ICU if patient has left the ICU earlier than Day 28, or at withdrawal)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg: Pre-DoseSystolic Blood Pressure, mmHg : LOPDiastolic Blood Pressure, mmHg : Pre-DoseDiastolic Blood Pressure, mmHg : LOPMean Arterial Pressure, mmHg : Pre-DoseMean Arterial Pressure, mmHg : LOP
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg114.6124.358.965.176.582.7
Placebo110.2120.355.662.673.680.8

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety: Adverse Events and Deaths

Adverse events (AE) up to Day 28. Per protocol, AEs occurring after Day 28 if the investigator considered a causal relationship with the study drug as well as all deaths up to Day 360 were reported. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that begins or worsens in intensity after at least one dose of study drug has been administered. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was an important medical event. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: AEs up to Day 28, only related after Day 28 and deaths up to Day 360

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subjects with TEAESubjects with AE considered related to study drugSubjects with SAEDeath
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg130417751
Placebo132337753

[back to top]

Efficacy Endpoint: Presence of Neutralising Antibodies to IFN Beta-1a

The immunological response to FP-1201-lyo was assessed by monitoring presence of anti-drug binding antibodies (BAbs) and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) to IFN beta-1a on pre-dose Day 1 and at Day 28, the last day in ICU or early termination (if earlier). The BAbs were determined first, and if present, the NAbs were also determined. Presence of BAbs and NAbs were summarised categorically, using positive/negative classification. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 28 (or last day in intensive care unit [ICU] or at withdrawal, if earlier)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Presence of BAbs to IFN β-1a at baselinePresence of BAbs to IFN β-1a at Day28Presence of NAbs to IFN β-1a at baselinePresence of NAbs to IFN β-1a at Day28
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg2010
Placebo2100

[back to top]

Changes in Levels of Potential Inflammatory Markers (PIMs)

Evaluation of potential inflammatory markers (PIMs) change from baseline to D14 between treatments arms over time. Potential biomarkers included IL-1ra, IL-6, FGF basic, IP-10 and TNF-α. (NCT02622724)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 14

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
IL-1raIL-6FGF basicIP-10TNF-α
FP-1201-lyo 10 μg18306337193868
Placebo16998838176281

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Tumor Response

Tumor response was assessed as one of the following: Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 millimeter (mm). Partial response (PR): At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD). PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. (NCT02627144)
Timeframe: Baseline until progression or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 6 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPDNot Evaluable
Advanced and/or Metastatic RCC Participants5.321.939.116.617.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS time is defined as time between start of therapy and progression or death. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for evaluation. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. (NCT02627144)
Timeframe: Baseline until progression or intolerable toxicity or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 6 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Advanced and/or Metastatic RCC Participants10.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

Disease control was defined as having achieved CR, PR, and/or SD during the course of the observation. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. (NCT02627144)
Timeframe: Baseline until progression or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 6 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Advanced and/or Metastatic RCC Participants66.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

OS time is defined as time between start of therapy and date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for evaluation. (NCT02627144)
Timeframe: Baseline until progression or intolerable toxicity or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 6 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Advanced and/or Metastatic RCC Participants28.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain

Survey name: RAND 36-Item Health Survey (Version 1.0) Scale name: Pain Scale range: 0-100; Higher score means less pain (NCT02666768)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionchange in units on the pain scale (Least Squares Mean)
Gamma Interferon-1b-0.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

BMD measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in bone area w/ BMD<169mg/m3 (NCT02666768)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Gamma Interferon-1b0

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)

(NCT02666768)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionx1000 cells/uL (Median)
Gamma Interferon-1b-0.5

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of GPT

Tmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

Interventiondays (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a2.8
Placebo14.0
Ribavirin3.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of PEG-IFN

Evaluation of PEG-IFN arm after Day 0. Evaluation of ribavirin and placebo arms after Day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr and 24 hr and at approximately every other visit up to Day 126

Intervention(nanogram/milliliter)*day ([ng/ml]*d) (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a2097.9
Placebo1270.4
Ribavirin1164.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Glutamate-Pyruvate Transaminase (GPT)

(NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

Intervention(Units/liter)*day ([U/L]*d) (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a5078.3
Placebo7233.5
Ribavirin5231.3

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of PEG-IFN

Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. Evaluation of PEG-IFN arm after day 0. Evaluation of ribavirin and placebo arms after day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr and 24 hr and at approximately every other visit up to Day 126

Interventionng/ml (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a28.77
Placebo20.36
Ribavirin19.8

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ribavirin

Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. Evaluation of ribavirin arm after day 0. Evaluation of placebo and PEG-IFN arms after day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

Interventionmcg/ml (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a2.95
Placebo2.83
Ribavirin3.37

[back to top]

Log Likelihood Median Values of Hepatitis C-Virus (HCV) Kinetic Models for Quantitative HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Measurement With Various Assumptions of Ribavirin Mechanism of Action

To investigate possible action mechanisms, three different models were fitted to viruskinetic data and evaluated using related log-likelihood function values. These models were designed assuming individual effects with respect to infectiousness (model 1), virus production (model 2) or degradation of infected cells rate (model 3). The following viruskinetic parameters were fitted in each model: initial viral load, loss rate of infected cells (delta), effectivity of interferon with respect to a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. A lower log likelihood function value indicates a lesser fit for the model. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: Up to Day 126

,,
Interventionlog likelihood function value (Median)
Model 1= infectiousnessModel 2= virus productionModel 3= degradation rate
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a-27.0-28.2-27.1
Ribavirin-21.4-23.8-20.7
Total Participant Group-22.2-23.9-23.1

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of PEG-IFN

Tmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. Evaluation of PEG-IFN arm after day 0. Evaluation of ribavirin and placebo arms after day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr and 24 hr and at approximately every other visit up to Day 126

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a6.3
Placebo12.0
Ribavirin6.0

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Ribavirin

Tmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. Evaluation of ribavirin arm after day 0. Evaluation of placebo and PEG-IFN arms after day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a6.0
Placebo8.0
Ribavirin6.4

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Ribavirin

Evaluation of ribavirin arm after Day 0. Evaluation of placebo and PEG-IFN arms after Day 42. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

Intervention(microgram/milliliter)*day ([mcg/ml]*d) (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a186.6
Placebo179.4
Ribavirin290.1

[back to top]

Score in Quality of Life Assessed Using Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Questionnaire

"SF-36 is a psychometric scale to quantify health conditions. This psychometric scale has 8 dimensions of the subjective health status and consists of 36 individual items that have a varying number of related item scores (ranging from yes/no up to a 6-point scale). At first the raw scores were determined by summation over all items and weighted accordingly. Afterwards the raw scores were transformed to ranges of 0-100 with 100 being the highest level of health and compared to published reference scales. The following eight dimensions of subjective health conditions were considered: physical functioning index, role physical index, pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning index, role emotional index and mental health index. The SF36 questionnaire had to be answered by the patients at screening before monotherapy, after monotherapy and at the end of the study (=end of combination therapy)." (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: At screening (Days -56 to -1), at end of monotherapy (Week 6) and at end of combination therapy (Week 18)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical functioning index: ScreeningPhysical functioning index: End of monotherapyPhysical functioning index: End of comb. therapyRole physical index: ScreeningRole physical index: End of monotherapyRole physical index: End of combination therapyPain: ScreeningPain: End of monotherapyPain: End of combination therapyGeneral health perception: ScreeningGeneral health perception: End of monotherapyGeneral health perception: End of comb. therapyVitality: ScreeningVitality: End of monotherapyVitality: End of combination therapySocial functioning index: ScreeningSocial functioning index: End of monotherapySocial functioning index: End of comb. therapyRole emotional index: ScreeningRole emotional index: End of monotherapyRole emotional index: End of combination therapyMental health index: ScreeningMental health index: End of monotherapyMental health index: End of combination therapy
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a95.690.867.175.066.725.089.373.272.358.658.260.054.245.040.875.072.968.855.655.633.368.561.372.2
Placebo76.572.373.055.656.840.070.361.556.053.659.255.252.844.132.579.268.261.366.769.750.063.162.861.6
Ribavirin79.768.453.462.550.529.770.066.060.162.954.347.150.941.839.883.880.156.362.553.335.464.561.547.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Response

HCV-RNA level was measured at each visit by a central laboratory. Treatment response was estimated applying the following definitions of response/non-response: 1) Adequate first phase decline: HCV RNA decline ≥ 0.5 log10 International Units/milliliter (IU/mL) from time 0 to 48 hours of PEG-IFN treatment (PEG-IFN arm: day 0 - day 2; placebo and ribavirin arm: day 42-day 44), 2) Rapid virologic response: HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL (=detection limit) on day 70, 3) Complete early virologic response: HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL on day 126, 4) Partial early virologic response (log decrease): HCV RNA decrease ≥ 2 log10 IU/mL from day 0 to day 126, 5) Partial early virologic response (cut off): HCV RNA <30000 IU/mL on day 126, 6) Non-response: HCV RNA decrease <2 log10 IU/mL from day 0 to day 126, 7) Null-response: HCV RNA decrease <1 log10 IU/mL from day 0 to day 28 and from day 0 to day 70 for PEG-IFN arm and placebo / ribavirin arm, respectively. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: Up to Day 126

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adequate first phase declineRapid virologic responseComplete early virologic responsePartial early virologic response (log decrease)Partial early virologic response (cut off)Non-responseNull responder
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a79436479792136
Placebo65304878782226
Ribavirin72207284841612

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of GPT

Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration-time data. (NCT02716779)
Timeframe: From Day 0 at 0 hour (hr), 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr and 72 hr, Day 42 at 0 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 36 hr and at each visit up to Day 126.

InterventionU/L (Median)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a68.5
Placebo88.0
Ribavirin75.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Reductions in Serum HBV DNA

To assess antiviral activity of REP 2139-Ca when combined with pegylated interferon on serum HBV DNA. (NCT02726789)
Timeframe: 48 weeks (treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Reductions in Serum HBsAg

To assess antiviral activity of REP 2139-Ca when combined with pegylated interferon on serum HBsAg. (NCT02726789)
Timeframe: 48 weeks (treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Treatment Emergent Laboratory Test Abnormalities or Adverse Events.

To record side effects, symptoms and adverse effects of exposure to REP 2139-Ca when combined pegylated interferon. (NCT02726789)
Timeframe: 48 weeks (treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Serum Anti-HBs > 10 mIU / ml

To assess antiviral activity of REP 2139-Ca when combined with pegylated interferon on anti-HBsAg antibody titer. (NCT02726789)
Timeframe: 48 weeks (treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental5

[back to top]

Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions

CUA (the number of new contrast-enhanced lesions on T1 images, and new or expanding lesions on T2 images (lesion identified on T1-and T2 images is not counted twice). (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionlesions (Median)
BCD-0330.0
Rebif0.0
Placebo1.0

[back to top]

Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions

Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions (CUA) -- the number of new MRI contrast uptake lesions on T1 images, and new or expanding lesions on T2 images (lesion identified on T1-and T2 images is not counted twice) after 52 weeks blinded application of interferon-β1а (BCD-033 and Rebif®) (44 mcg). (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionlesions (Median)
BCD-0330.0
Rebif0.0

[back to top]

Relapse Free Time

"Time to first relapse in per protocol population" (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
BCD-033207.0
Rebif/BCD-033183.0

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events

quantity and grade of all SAE is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 52 week of study

Interventionadverse events (Number)
BCD-0330
Rebif/BCD-0330
Placebo/BCD-0333

[back to top]

Annual Relapse Rate

Annual Relapse Rate ARR for 96 weeks was evaluated in two groups, after the administraion of IFN beta-1a in a full dose for 96 weeks. (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 week

Interventionrelapses (Mean)
BCD-0330.208
Rebif0.145

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events Frequency

AE grade 3-4 (CTCAE 4.03)is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventionadverse events (Number)
BCD-0332
Rebif/BCD-0333

[back to top]

Withdrawal

quantity of withdrawals due to AE/SAE is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16, 52 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
week 16week 52
BCD-03301
Placebo/BCD-03312
Rebif11

[back to top]

Relapse Free Time

"Time to first relapse in per protocol population" (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16, 52 weeks

,,
Interventiondays (Median)
week 16week 52
BCD-03333.5193.0
Placebo/BCD-03315.074.0
Rebif14.0123.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Without Confirmed Relapse

proportion of subjects without confirmed relapse in PP (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16, 52 weeks

,,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
week 16week 52
BCD-0334941
Placebo4539
Rebif4644

[back to top]

Immunogenicity

Count of Participants with Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Binding AntibodiesNeutralizing Antibodies
BCD-0331916
Rebif/BCD-0331413

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events Frequency

AE grade 3-4 (CTCAE 4.03) is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionadverse events (Number)
BCD-0335
Rebif4
Placebo/BCD-0337

[back to top]

Adverse Reaction/Serious Adverse Reactions

quantity and grade of all adverse reactions/serious adverse reactions is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionadverse events (Number)
week 16week 52
BCD-0336792
Placebo/BCD-0333392
Rebif5980

[back to top]

Immunogenicity

Count of Participants with Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 16, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
week 16 : Binding Antibodiesweek 16 : Neutralizing Antibodiesweek 52 : Binding Antibodiesweek 52 : Neutralizing Antibodies
BCD-03365109
Placebo/BCD-0332277
Rebif/BCD-0335598

[back to top]

Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events

quantity and grade of all AE/SAE is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventionadverse events (Number)
BCD-033124
Rebif/BCD-033110

[back to top]

Annual Relapse Rate

Annual relapse rate ARR for 52 weeks was evaluated in all three groups, after the application of IFN beta-1a (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionrelapses (Mean)
BCD-0330.113
Rebif / BCD-0330.091
Placebo / BCD-0330.109

[back to top]

Number of Combined Unique Active Lesions

CUA (the number of new contrast-enhanced lesions on T1 images, and new or expanding lesions on T2 images (lesion identified on T1-and T2 images is not counted twice) (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

Interventionlesions (Median)
BCD-0330.0
Rebif/BCD-0330.0

[back to top]

Withdrawal

quantity of withdrawals due to AE/SAE is calculated in subjects, who received at least one dose of study drug (NCT02727907)
Timeframe: 96 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BCD-0331
Rebif/BCD-0331

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seronegative at Weeks 48 and 72

Samples were collected and analyzed for HBsAg. Seronegative HBsAg is defined as below the level of detection of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Weeks 48 and 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Seronegative HBsAg at Week 48Seronegative HBsAg at Week 72
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a03.23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels

Samples were collected and analyzed for HBsAg. Positive HBsAg levels are defined as levels above the level of detection of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Screening and at Weeks 48 and 72

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HBsAg Positive at ScreeningHBsAg Positive at Week 48HBsAg Positive at Week 72
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a312926

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 48

Samples were collected and analyzed for ALT levels. A normal ALT is a value within the normal range of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a45.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 72

Samples were collected and analyzed for ALT. A normal ALT is a value within the normal range of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a54.84

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Negative Hepatitis D Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HDV RNA) at Week 72

Samples were collected and analyzed for HDV RNA levels. Negative HDV RNA is defined as below the level of detection of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Week 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a61.29

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Negative HDV RNA at Week 48

Samples were collected and analyzed for HDV RNA levels. Negative HDV RNA is defined as below the level of detection of the assay. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a64.52

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (HBsAb) at Weeks 48 and 72

Samples were collected and analyzed for HBsAb. Positive HBsAb levels are defined as levels above the level of detection of the assay and reflect the presence of antibodies produced against HBsAg. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Weeks 48 and 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Positive HBsAb at Week 48Positive HBsAb at Week 72
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a3.233.23

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Below 1*10^5 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Weeks 48 and 72

Samples were collected and analyzed for HBV DNA levels. Reported here is the percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels below 1*10^5 copies/mL. (NCT02732639)
Timeframe: At Weeks 48 and 72

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HBV-DNA at Week 48HBV-DNA at Week 72
Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) Alfa-2a83.8774.19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Without SVR Among Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA at the End of Treatment

"SVR was defined as having undetectable HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after completion of study treatment. HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Test (limit of detection: 50 IU/mL). Percentage of participants without SVR among participants with undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment was reported (end of treatment = Week 48 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm and Week 72 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm)." (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "24 weeks after completion of study treatment (up to Week 72 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm and up to Week 96 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm)"

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks52.6
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks24.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

SVR was defined as having un-detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels 24 weeks after completion of study treatment. HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Test (limit of detection: 50 International Units per milliliter [IU/mL]). Participants with detectable HCV RNA or without measurement at the end of the 24 week after completion of study treatment were considered as non-responders. (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "24 weeks after completion of study treatment (up to Week 72 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm and up to Week 96 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm)"

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks23.8
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks36.5

[back to top]

Serum Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) RNA Levels

HIV RNA levels were measured using Roche AMPLICOR MONITOR HIV-1 Test (limit of detection: 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). Data for this outcome measure was to be reported up to 24 weeks after end of treatment visit (Week 72 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks' arm and Week 96 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks' arm). (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "For Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72; for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96"

,
InterventionLog10 copies per milliliter (Mean)
Baseline (n=12, 23)Week 4 (n=6, 16)Week 24 (n=9, 20)Week 48 (n=11, 17)Week 72 (n=10, 9)Week 96 (n=0, 13)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks4.233.943.964.024.08NA
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks4.643.984.214.414.514.22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA 12 Weeks After the Last Dose of Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A

HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Test (limit of detection: 50 IU/mL). Participants with detectable HCV RNA or without measurement at the end of 12 weeks after the last dose of Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A were considered as non-responders. (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "12 weeks after the last dose of Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A (up to Week 60 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm and up to Week 84 for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm)"

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks23.8
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks36.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV RNA

HCV RNA levels were measured using Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Test (limit of detection: 50 IU/mL). Data for this outcome measure was to be reported up to end of treatment visit (Week 48 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks' arm and Week 72 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks' arm). (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "For Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48; for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72"

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=73, 83)Week 12 (n=73, 81)Week 24 (n=73, 78)Week 48 (n=68, 71)Week 72 (n=0, 65)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks2.723.352.155.9NA
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks12.028.453.864.856.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Level Categories

ALT levels were classified as: Normal Limit (NL) (as per laboratory standard), >1-2 Upper Normal Limit (ULN), >2-5 ULN, >5-10 ULN, and >10 ULN. Percentage of participants in each of these ALT level categories was reported. Data for this outcome measure was to be reported up to 24 weeks after end of treatment visit (Week 72 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks' arm and Week 96 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks' arm). (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "For Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72; for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96"

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4, NL (n=70, 78)Week 4, >1-2 ULN (n=70, 78)Week 4, >2-5 ULN (n=70, 78)Week 4, >5-10 ULN (n=70, 78)Week 4, >10 ULN (n=70, 78)Week 12, NL (n=76, 77)Week 12, >1-2 ULN (n=76, 77)Week 12, >2-5 ULN (n=76, 77)Week 12, >5-10 ULN (n=76, 77)Week 12, >10 ULN (n=76, 77)Week 24, NL (n=74, 74)Week 24, >1-2 ULN (n=74, 74)Week 24, >2-5 ULN (n=74, 74)Week 24, >5-10 ULN (n=74, 74)Week 24, >10 ULN (n=74, 74)Week 48, NL (n=65, 71)Week 48, >1-2 ULN (n=65, 71)Week 48, >2-5 ULN (n=65, 71)Week 48, >5-10 ULN (n=65, 71)Week 48, >10 ULN (n=65, 71)Week 72, NL (n=59, 61)Week 72, >1-2 ULN (n=59, 61)Week 72, >2-5 ULN (n=59, 61)Week 72, >5-10 ULN (n=59, 61)Week 72, >10 ULN (n=59, 61)Week 96, NL (n=0, 62)Week 96, >1-2 ULN (n=0, 62)Week 96, >2-5 ULN (n=0, 62)Week 96, >5-10 ULN (n=0, 62)Week 96, >10 ULN (n=0, 62)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks50.040.010.00.00.061.827.610.50.00.070.327.02.70.00.067.724.67.70.00.052.527.120.30.00.0NANANANANA
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks52.638.59.00.00.062.329.95.21.31.363.528.46.80.01.469.026.82.81.40.068.927.93.30.00.050.035.512.91.60.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 4 (CD4) Cell Counts at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96

Data for this outcome measure was to be reported up to 24 weeks after end of treatment visit (Week 72 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks' arm and Week 96 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks' arm). (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "For Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72; for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96"

,
InterventionCells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3) (Mean)
Baseline (n=78, 81)Change at Week 4 (n=69, 74)Change at Week 12 (n=68, 75)Change at Week 24 (n=69, 68)Change at Week 48 (n=61, 67)Change at Week 72 (n=58, 55)Change at Week 96 (n=0, 62)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks578.7-148.2-185.4-206.7-209.49.5NA
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks546.2-88.0-164.5-178.4-196.4-167.5-15.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4/CD8 Ratio at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96

Data for this outcome measure was to be reported up to 24 weeks after end of treatment visit (Week 72 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks' arm and Week 96 for 'Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks' arm). (NCT02761629)
Timeframe: "For Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks arm: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72; for Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks arm: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96"

,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
Baseline (n=78, 81)Change at Week 4 (n=69, 74)Change at Week 12 (n=68, 75)Change at Week 24 (n=69, 68)Change at Week 48 (n=61, 67)Change at Week 72 (n=58, 55)Change at Week 96 (n=0, 62)
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 48 Weeks0.670.110.220.360.430.12NA
Peg-IFN-Alpha-2A+Ribavirin - 72 Weeks0.680.090.200.290.300.360.09

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, whether or not the event is considered related to the investigational product. A TEAE is any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, including any laboratory test value abnormality judged as clinically significant by the investigator, that occurs on or after the date of the first dose of study drug administered at home and throughout the duration of the clinical study, whether the adverse event is considered related to the treatment or not. A serious AE (SAE) is an AE that results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or other medically important event. (NCT02797080)
Timeframe: Baseline/Day 1 (Week 28 Follow-Up Visit for Study HZNP-ACT-302 ([NCT02593773]) through end of study; mean (SD) duration of treatment was 99.2 (58.48) days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 Related TEAE≥ 1 SAE≥ 1 Related SAE≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Interferon γ-1b2170000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship to the study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; Life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); Persistent or significant disability or incapacity; and congenital anomaly. (NCT02829775)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Interferon Alfa-2A in Cancer Participants1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Tumor Response

Tumor response was assessed every 6 months using hematological evaluation or any other appropriate diagnostic techniques, as per standard of care practice. The complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) status were recorded from case report form. (NCT02829775)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, withdrawal or death, whichever occurred earlier (assessed every 6 months up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
Interferon Alfa-2A in Cancer Participants90

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and 1 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)15
Group II (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)12

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

Will use simple statistics. (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Time interval between the date of first treatment and the date of response (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]), up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)126

[back to top]

Rate of Overall Response Duration Beyond 12 Months (ORR12)

Will be assessed per global assessment of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome (confirmed & investigator assessed). Will use binomial distribution. (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: From the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date beyond 12 months that recurrent disease is objectively documented, up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)2
Group II (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Time from enrollment to disease progression or death, whichever occurs earlier, based upon investigator assessment, up to 3 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)394.0
Group II (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)196.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Participants in Treatment Group 1 will be assessed for response and progression using standard response criteria in patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Per Global Response Score determined by evaluating skin, lymph nodes, internal organs (viscera), and blood specimens: Complete Response (CR), complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR), regression of measurable disease.~Participants in Treatment Group 2 will be assessed for response and progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Complete Response (CR) disappearance of all lesions and no new lesion; Partial Response (PR), 30% or greater reduction in tumor size and no new lesions.~The ORR is defined as CR combined with PR. Will be assessed using binomial proportion.~Best response at any timepoint was used to determine ORR." (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)6
Group II (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)0

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

Will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Termination due to toxicity, initiation of next significant treatment, progressive disease, or death of any cause, up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)185.5
Group II (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)73.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

Will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03063632)
Timeframe: Time interval between the date of first response (CR/PR) and the date of progression, up to 2 years and 11 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Group I (Pembrolizumab, Interferon Gamma-1b)505.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in Two or More Patients [Safety]

To evaluate the number of patients with toxicity events while on SV-BR-1-GM, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (NCT03066947)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients with Adverse EventsErythema injection sitePruritis injection siteInduration injection siteFatigueNauseaConstipationAbdominal painFlu like symptomsDiarrheaGGTP increasedInjection site reactionUrinary Tract InfectionVomitingAbdominal distensionAlkaline Phosphatase IncreasedALT IncreasedAnorexiaAST IncreasedBack PainChillsDecreased appetiteDehydrationDizzinessErythema MultiformeGlucose increasedHematocrit DecreasedHypercalcemiaLymphocytes DecreasedMyalgiaPleural Effusion
SV-BR-1-GM Monotherapy241187665443333322222222222222222

[back to top]

Rate of Non-progression of Tumors

Non-progressive rate, defined as CR, PR or stable disease (SD) per RECIST and iRECIST criteria (NCT03066947)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SV-BR-1-GM Monotherapy4

[back to top]

Durability of Tumor Response

Durability of response, as defined as complete response (disappearance of all tumors), partial response (30% or greater reduction in the sum of diameters of target lesions (tumors) with stable disease in non-target lesions) or stable disease (less than 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no new lesions appearing) by evaluating those patients eligible to complete the optional treatments from 9-12 months (NCT03066947)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
SV-BR-1-GM Monotherapy105.5

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate

Objective response rate (ORR), defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) criteria. (NCT03066947)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SV-BR-1-GM Monotherapy0

[back to top]

Duration of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events [Safety]

To evaluate the duration of toxicity events while on SV-BR-1-GM, as defined by CTCAE (NCT03066947)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionDays (Median)
Median Duration8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Phase 2: Clinical Response

Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) based upon tumor measurements obtained on physical examination at baseline, after completion of 4 cycles of study therapy. Factors that will be evaluated include: Breast mass(es) - size (longest dimension); Axillary lymph node(s) - size (longest dimension); Skin edema of the breast - present worse, present unchanged, present improved, or absent; Skin erythema of the breast - present worse, present unchanged, present improved, or absent. (NCT03112590)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Phase 2251121

[back to top]

Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)/Number of Participants Who Progressed

"Progression will be evaluated in this study using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, version 1.1.~PFS is defined as the time from study therapy to the first occurrence of ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence, ipsilateral locoregional invasive breast cancer recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, distant recurrence, or death from any cause. This is reported as number of participants who progressed." (NCT03112590)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 21

[back to top]

Phase 2: Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR)

"Pathologic complete response in the breast at definitive surgery after completion of protocol therapy. The pathologic response to treatment will be assessed by an institutional pathologist at Moffitt Cancer Center. The pathologist will evaluate response by the Residual Cancer Burden(RCB) for each participant as described in the online calculator (see RCB link in the More Information section). pCR is defined as no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast and lymph notes at definitive surgery following neoadjuvant therapy" (NCT03112590)
Timeframe: After post therapy surgery - Therapy: approximately 12 weeks per participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy52

[back to top]

Tentative Disease Specific Marker Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73, Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase Enzyme) Concentration in Serum Samples

CD73 (ecto-5'-nucleotidase enzyme) concentration (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 0 up to Day 13

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 9Day 13
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg2.12.02.22.02.33.03.83.92.9
FP-1201-lyo Placebo2.22.22.22.32.63.53.83.82.7

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Days Receiving Hemodialysis

Number of days receiving hemodialysis. There were only few reported values other than zero. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30 and Day 90

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Day 30Day 90
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg0.90.6
FP-1201-lyo Placebo0.00.0

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Prevalence of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome by Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP)

Intra-abdominal pressure values, which were routinely measured during ICU stay via urine bladder catheter. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Days 1 - 6, D9 and D13 during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6
FP-1201-lyo Placebo10.312.110.38.612.515.0

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Prevalence of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome by Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP)

Intra-abdominal pressure values, which were routinely measured during ICU stay via urine bladder catheter. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Days 1 - 6, D9 and D13 during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 9Day 13
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg15.412.213.111.410.511.411.010.8

[back to top]

Pharmacoeconomic Information of Length of ICU Stay, Length of Hospital Stay, Length of Stay at Another Health Care Facility, Length of Hemodialysis Needed, Ventilation Free Days

"Economic measurement:~Length of ICU stay, in terms of ICU free days at D30~Length of hospital stay, in terms of hospital free days at D90~Length of stay at another health care facility at D90~The number of days on hemodialysis at D30 and at D90~The number of organ failure free days at D30~The number of ventilation free days at D30" (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30 or Day 90

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
ICU free days at Day 30Days in hospital at Day 90Days in another facility at Day 90Days on hemodialysis at Day 30Days on hemodialysis at Day 90Organ failure free days at Day 30Ventilation free days at Day 30
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg16.818.111.80.90.60.020.6
FP-1201-lyo Placebo21.913.87.00.00.00.025.1

[back to top]

Safety Parameters of Clinically Significant Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events, Vital Signs and Clinical Laboratory Parameters

Number of TEAEs from vital signs data, laboratory data, physical examinations and spontaneous reporting when conscious. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 30

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Product-related TEAEsSevere TEAEsSerious TEAEsTEAEs Leading to Study Product DiscontinuationTEAEs Leading to Death
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg17282677
FP-1201-lyo Placebo12511

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning All Cause Mortality

Number of fatalities (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg6
FP-1201-lyo Placebo2

[back to top]

Myxovirus Resistant Protein A (MxA) Concentration in Whole Blood Samples as Pharmacodynamic Marker

Concentration of Myxovirus Resistant Protein A (MxA) (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 0 up to Day 13

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 9Day 13
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg3.515.019.821.236.448.350.414.33.9
FP-1201-lyo Placebo6.05.13.83.34.13.13.64.88.7

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Organ Failure Free Days by Means of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

"Organ failure free days were defined as the number of days in the first 30 days after the first dose of study medication that the patient was alive and free of organ failure with a SOFA score of zero for the following six organ parameters: respiration, coagulation, liver, cardiovascular, central nervous system and renal function. It is graded from 0 to 4 according to the degree of dysfunction/ failure (higher scores indicate more severe organ failure). Patients who died without achieving a SOFA score of zero was assigned an organ failure free days value of zero.~Note: the information for organ failure free days has been only collected when the patients have been in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). As ICU free days have been reported in a separate variable, it was decided that presented information will be kept, without trying to conduct imputation." (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventiondays (Mean)
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg0.0
FP-1201-lyo Placebo0.0

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning All Cause Mortality

Number of fatalities (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 90

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg7
FP-1201-lyo Placebo2

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Number of Ventilator Free Days (VFDs)

Number of ventilator free days. VFDs to Day 30 were defined as the number of calendar days after initiating unassisted breathing (UAB) to Day 30 from first treatment, assuming that a patient survives at least 48 consecutive hours after initiating UAB. Patients who die without initiating UAB were assigned a VFD value of zero. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventiondays (Median)
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg25.0
FP-1201-lyo Placebo29.0

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Disability by Modified Ranking Scale (mRS).

Scale gives the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities. Single mRS value is applied for every patient based on patient or caregiver interview. The scale runs from 0-6, from perfect health without symptoms to death. Pre-operation Baseline Visit mRS value is collected for reference. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No symptoms - 0No significant disability - 1Slight disability - 2Moderate disability - 3Moderately severe disability - 4Severe disability - 5Death - 6
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg5532327
FP-1201-lyo Placebo2510012

[back to top]

The Efficacy of FP-1201-lyo Compared to Placebo Concerning Neutralizing Antibodies Against IFN Beta-1a (NAbs) in Whole Blood Samples

IFN beta-1a neutralizing antibodies immune response. Blood samples for the NAbs assessments were collected at Day 0 pre-dose (baseline) and at Day 30. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 30

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 30
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg00
FP-1201-lyo Placebo00

[back to top]

Tentative Disease Specific, Potential Inflammatory Marker - Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in Serum Samples

IL-6 concentration. (NCT03119701)
Timeframe: Day 0 up to Day 13

,
Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 3Day 6Day 9
FP-1201-lyo 10 µg328.9493.1181.4164.1107.9
FP-1201-lyo Placebo378.9460.2130.779.174.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Months 4 and 8

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral, and other). EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicated worst outcomes. (NCT03368664)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 4 and 8

Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Month 4Month 8
Alemtuzumab0.050.00

[back to top]

Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan

Number of participants with at least one new or enlarged T2 lesions per MRI scan was reported in this outcome measure. Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per scan was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during treatment period. (NCT03368664)
Timeframe: Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month 4 to Month 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 110
Period 23

[back to top]

Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan

Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per scan was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during a specified period divided by the total number of scans performed during that specified period. (NCT03368664)
Timeframe: Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month 4 to Month 8

Interventionlesions per scan (Number)
Period 13.53
Period 20.13

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Will be treated as bivariate time-to-event data and will be summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT03403634)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until disease progression (defined by RECIST 1.1) or last-follow-up, assessed up to 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Celecoxib, Interferon Alfa-2b, Rintatolimod)1.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be treated as bivariate time-to-event data and will be summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT03403634)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until death due to any cause or last follow-up, assessed up to 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Celecoxib, Interferon Alfa-2b, Rintatolimod)10.5

[back to top]

Change in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in the Colorectal Cancer Lesions

"The TILs will be summarized by time-point (pre-/post-treatment) using the mean, median, standard deviation; and graphically using dot-plots.~The TIL of interest is CD8a expression, which is reported as the mean fold change from pre-treatment (i.e. post treatment / pre treatment)." (NCT03403634)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionfold change (Mean)
Treatment (Celecoxib, Interferon Alfa-2b, Rintatolimod)7.25

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1

Will be treated as binary data and summarized using frequencies and relative frequencies; with the ORR estimated using a 90% confidence interval obtained using Jeffrey's prior method. (NCT03403634)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Celecoxib, Interferon Alfa-2b, Rintatolimod)0

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events

Number of participants with treatment-related serious adverse events by laboratory tests and physician examination (NCT03480932)
Timeframe: 16 weeks for SOF+DAC+PEG and 24 weeks for SOF+DAC

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+DAC+PEG0
SOF+DAC, DOT0
SOF+DAC, Standard0

[back to top]

Medication Adherence

Adherence to medication regimen defined using a combination of the biometric data for Arms 1 and 2 and self-report and pill counts for Arm 3. Percentage reporting at least 90% adherence (NCT03480932)
Timeframe: 4 weeks for SOF+DAC+PEG and 12 weeks for SOF+DAC

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+DAC+PEG35
SOF+DAC, DOT31
SOF+DAC, Standard10

[back to top]

SVR12

Percentage of participants achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks quantification) after treatment is completed (SVR12) as assessed by HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification measured 12 weeks after treatment completion (NCT03480932)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after treatment completion, 16 weeks for SOF+DAC+PEG and 24 weeks for SOF+DAC

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SOF+DAC+PEG26
SOF+DAC, DOT30
SOF+DAC, Standard17

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Responder Status at 24 Weeks of Follow-up

The number of participants achieving sustained responder status at 24 weeks of follow-up was assessed. A participant was classified as a sustained responder if, at 24 weeks of follow-up, they met both of the following criteria: 1) HCV-RNA negative (defined as <100 copies/mL serum by qPCR assay); and 2) ALT level normal. (NCT03537274)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks (up to 48 weeks treatment and 24 weeks follow-up)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG-Intron, 0.5 mg/kg52
PEG-Intron, 1.0 mg/kg70
PEG-Intron, 1.5 mg/kg69
Interferon Alfa-2b37

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Responder Status at 24 Weeks of Treatment

The number of participants achieving responder status at 24 weeks of treatment was assessed. A participant was classified as a responder if, at 24 weeks of treatment, they met both of the following criteria: 1) HCV-Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) negative (defined as <100 copies/mL serum by quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR] assay); and 2) alanine transaminase (ALT) level normal. (NCT03537274)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG-Intron, 0.5 mg/kg80
PEG-Intron, 1.0 mg/kg87
PEG-Intron, 1.5 mg/kg90
Interferon Alfa-2b59

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (CR) to PEG Intron and Intron A at 6 Months

Cytogenetic response (CR) at 6 months, as at 12 months, was defined by the degree of suppression of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph^1) achieved during study treatment. The determination of CR at 6 months was based on cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow aspirate samples. The CR criteria were based on the percentage (%) of PH^1-positive cells during study treatment. Protocol-defined CR criteria were Complete (0%), Partial (1-34%), Minor (35-90%), or No Response (>90%). Data for the analysis population was based on the intent-to-treat principle. Participants who were treatment failures at 6 months were considered cytogenetic non-responders. Recording of CR was independent of hematologic responses. (NCT03547154)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response: 0% Ph+Partial Response: 1-34% Ph+Minor Response: 35-90% Ph+No Response: >90% Ph+Participant with Missing Data
INTRON A (Interferon Alfa-2b)719514848
PEG Intron (Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b)323376147

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival

Participants were followed for survival; those who did not achieve a major cytogenetic response were discontinued from the study. For participants who completed 1 year of study treatment and continued to Year 2 and beyond, survival and disease progression every 3 months were assessed, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. Participants were followed until resolution of any drug-related nonserious adverse event, and any SAE occurring while on the study or within 30 days of last dose of study drug. Participant death during survival follow-up was reported to the drug safety unit of the Sponsor. Each participant (whether discontinued or still on treatment) was followed every 3 months for survival and disease progression information. Overall survival was analyzed using the log-rank statistic, and the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the HR were obtained using Cox's proportional hazards model. (NCT03547154)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years (24 months), and beyond

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathsSurvivors
INTRON A (Interferon Alfa-2b)15158
PEG Intron (Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b)17154

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Responses to PEG Intron and Intron A at 6 Months

Hematologic response at 6 months was assessed, while the hematologic response was measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months during the first year of study treatment. To be considered a hematologic responder a participant must have met all of the following criteria for a minimum of 28 days: WBC count <10,000/μL; platelet count <450,000/L; normal differential count in peripheral blood (manual differential count); no palpable spleen. Participants achieving a complete hematologic response at 3 months had the cytogenetic response evaluated at 3 months as well. Participants who achieved a complete hematologic response by 6 months continued treatment for another 6 months. Participants who failed to achieve a complete hematologic response after 6 months of treatment were considered treatment failures, and further treatment for this group was at the discretion of the treating physician. Participants may have continued to receive their assigned study medication for an additional 6 months. (NCT03547154)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponseTreatment FailureMissing
INTRON A (Interferon Alfa-2b)984431
PEG Intron (Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b)915228

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants were to be followed for survival every 3 months. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. After the early termination of the study, participants were followed for safety only. Although the OS analysis is not in the clinical study report due to early termination of the study, an OS ad hoc analysis was requested by the FDA and is therefore presented in this outcome measure. Below table presents the median duration of survival for participants. (NCT03552549)
Timeframe: From time of randomization to time of death (up to approximately 26 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
PEG-IntronNA
INTRON A23.72

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. (NCT03554005)
Timeframe: Up to 40 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 0.75 mcg/kg OW0
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 1.5 mcg/kg OW0
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 3 mcg/kg OW0
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 4.5 mcg/kg OW0
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 6 mcg/kg OW0
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 7.5 mcg/kg OW3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. (NCT03554005)
Timeframe: Up to 42 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 0.75 mcg/kg OW1
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 1.5 mcg/kg OW2
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 3 mcg/kg OW1
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 4.5 mcg/kg OW2
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 6 mcg/kg OW11
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 7.5 mcg/kg OW11

[back to top]

Best Objective Response

Best Objective Response data were based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and included four categories. Complete Response (CR) was the disappearance of all clinically detectable malignant disease. Partial Response (PR) was a decrease of ≥50% of the sum of products of largest perpendicular diameters of all bidimensionally measurable lesions; and a decrease of ≥50% in sum of largest diameters of all unidimensionally measure lesions. Stable Disease (SD) was a <50% decrease or <25% increase in sum of products of largest perpendicular diameters of all bidimensionally measurable lesions; or a <50% decrease or <25% increase in sum of diameters of all unidimensionally measurable lesions. In addition, no new lesions appeared. Progressive Disease (PD) was a ≥25% increase in size of at least one bidimensionally or unidimensionally measurable lesion or appearance of new lesion. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if substantiated by positive cytology. (NCT03554005)
Timeframe: Up to 40 Weeks

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Evaluated
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 0.75 mcg/kg OW00100
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 1.5 mcg/kg OW00200
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 3 mcg/kg OW10001
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 4.5 mcg/kg OW01010
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 6 mcg/kg OW30611
PEG Interferon Alfa-2b 7.5 mcg/kg OW04421

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction in Fibroscan Transient Elastography Values

Reduction in Fibroscan transient elastography values by >25% of baseline at end of therapy. (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Normalization of Serum ALT

Normalization of serum ALT (ALT <20 in females and ALT <31 in males) at the end of therapy, at week 12 of posttherapy follow-up and at week 24 of post-therapy follow-up, OR reduction in serum ALT by >50% of baseline at week 12 of post therapy follow up and week 24 of post therapy follow up. (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: End of therapy, and 12 and 24 weeks after completing therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment2

[back to top]

Change in Quantitative Log HBsAg Levels From Baseline 24 Weeks After Completing Therapy

Change in quantitative log HBsAg levels at from baseline to 24 weeks after completing therapy (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks after completing therapy

Interventionlog IU/mL (Mean)
Treatment0.16

[back to top]

Change in Quantitative Log HBsAg Levels From Baseline to Week 24

Change in quantitative log HBsAg levels at from baseline to week 24 (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionlog IU/mL (Mean)
Treatment0.15

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinue Medication

Discontinuation of the medication before 24 weeks by the clinical team or patient will be considered a failure to tolerate the medicine. (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction in Histologic Inflammatory Scores (Modified HAI)

Reduction in histologic inflammatory scores (modified HAI) by at least two points with no progression in histologic fibrosis (Ishak) at week 24 post-treatment follow-up. (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: End of treatment and 24 weeks after completing therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decline of Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) RNA Viral Titer of >2 Logs

Decline of HDV RNA viral titer of >2 logs from baseline at 24 weeks of therapy (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at 24 Weeks After Completing Therapy

Loss of HBsAg from the serum at 24 weeks after completing therapy (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after completing therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at Week 12 Weeks After Completing Therapy

Loss of HBsAg from the serum at 12 weeks after completing therapy (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after completing therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Loss of HBsAg at Week 24

Loss of HBsAg from the serum at week 24 (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG)

Reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements by >25% of baseline OR normalization of HVPG (<5 mm Hg) at 24 weeks after completing therapy (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks after completing therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response

Undetectable HDV RNA at both 12 and 24 weeks post treatment follow-up visits (NCT03600714)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks after completing therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI, where Complete Response (CR) corresponds to the disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT04081389)
Timeframe: Up to 4 week post-treatment (with a range of 7 to 11 weeks).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 10
Arm 2: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 21
Arm 3: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 32
Arm 4: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 42

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)

RFS is defined as local/regional invasive recurrence, invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant recurrence, inoperable (meaning no surgery because of progression), and/or death from breast cancer (per standard of care according to physician discretion) or any cause. RFS will be calculated from the time of treatment to event. The median RFS was estimated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods (where NR = not reached). (NCT04081389)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm 1: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 112.0
Arm 2: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 2NA
Arm 3: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 311.4
Arm 4: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 411.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined by death from breast cancer, non-breast cancer, unknown, or any other cause and will be calculated from the time of study entry to event. The median OS is estimated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods (where NR = not reached). (NCT04081389)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm 1: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 121.7
Arm 2: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 2NA
Arm 3: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 3NA
Arm 4: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 4NA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities

"Safety and toxicity will be assessed using the CTEP NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 5.0). The resulting dose limiting toxicity (DLT) information is used to identify the appropriate dose level of CKM and paclitaxel for future clinical exploration.~The following events will be considered a DLT:~The event occurs within 3 weeks following 1st dose of combination CKM + paclitaxel therapy and subsequent enrollment for dose-escalation will only proceed after the 3-week period has been completed.~The toxicity has been determined by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to celecoxib, rintatolimod, interferon-α2b or paclitaxel.~Any death not clearly due to th" (NCT04081389)
Timeframe: Within 21 days of treatment adminstration

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 10
Arm 2: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 20
Arm 3: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 30
Arm 4: Interferon Alpha-2b at DL 40

[back to top]

Undetectable COVID PCR Testing at Day 14

Negative COVID PCR testing 14 days after first lambda dose (NCT04343976)
Timeframe: 14 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lambda Treatment2
Saline Placebo2

[back to top]

Undetectable COVID PCR at Day 7

Negative COVID PCR testing 7 days after first lambda dose (NCT04343976)
Timeframe: 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lambda Treatment1
Saline Placebo4

[back to top]

Undetectable COVID PCR at Day 3

Negative COVID PCR testing 3 days after first lambda dose (NCT04343976)
Timeframe: 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lambda Treatment1
Saline Placebo4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Basophils

Blood to evaluate basophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.0000.0020.0150.0090.0210.027
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.0030.0110.0040.0220.0070.049
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.0010.0090.0100.0160.0270.031
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.0020.0030.0070.0150.0220.028

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood to evaluate AST was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The measure was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 58.013.2-6.2-12.6-10.9-10.8
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6-5.1-11.3-10.8-27.2-19.0-26.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-4.6-5.2-16.5-13.5-13.9-15.8
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-10.0-19.8-20.6-26.3-30.8-22.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

Blood to evaluate ALT was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The measure was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
InterventionUnits/Liter (U/L) (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 517.641.418.89.93.5-3.2
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62.61.54.0-15.1-4.9-9.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 55.013.55.39.02.6-6.4
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 610.93.8-8.7-11.1-17.6-13.8

[back to top]

Time to Recovery for Patients With a Baseline Ordinal Score of 4 and 5

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionDays (Median)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 55.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 55.0

[back to top]

Duration of Hospitalization

Duration of hospitalization was determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 566
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62816.5
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 566
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 61010

[back to top]

Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline

The NEW score has demonstrated an ability to discriminate patients at risk of poor outcomes. This score is based on 7 clinical parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, any supplemental oxygen, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, level of consciousness). The NEW Score is being used as an efficacy measure. The minimum score is 0, representing the better outcome, and the maximum value is 19, representing the worse outcome. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 22Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.7-1.1-1.4-1.6-1.6-1.5-1.7
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 61.01.61.71.41.91.61.9
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.6-1.0-1.3-1.4-1.6-1.6-1.9
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-0.7-1.3-0.6-1.0-1.5-1.7-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)

Blood to evaluate CRP was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The measure was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-44.3-59.0-63.8-65.6-66.6-69.2
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6-46.6-55.6-57.4-36.0-27.8-46.5
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-40.0-58.2-63.3-66.6-65.6-70.2
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-37.6-40.5-69.3-75.6-72.1-76.8

[back to top]

Time to an Improvement of One Category Using an Ordinal Scale

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Time to improvement by at least one category was determined for each participant. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionDays (Median)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 512.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 615.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 512.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 65.0

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use

Incidence of new ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use was assessed among participants not on ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use at baseline. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.04
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.54
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.05
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.15

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Oxygen Use

Incidence of new oxygen use was assessed as for participants in Ordinal Score 4 and 5 who were not on oxygen at baseline. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.51
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.57

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use

Proportion of participants with new non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen use was assessed as for participants in Ordinal Score 4 and 5. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.15
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An SAE is defined as an AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or the sponsor, it results in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 514.7
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 660.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 513.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 624.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Grade 3 and 4 Clinical and/or Laboratory Adverse Events (AEs)

Grade 3 AEs are defined as events that interrupt usual activities of daily living, or significantly affects clinical status, or may require intensive therapeutic intervention. Severe events are usually incapacitating. Grade 4 AEs are defined as events that are potentially life threatening. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 538.9
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 660.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 531.7
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 636.4

[back to top]

28-day Participant Mortality

The mortality rate was determined as the proportion of participants who died by study Day 29. The proportions reported are Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a0.05
Remdesivir Plus Placebo0.03

[back to top]

14-day Participant Mortality

The mortality rate was determined as the proportion of participants who died by study Day 15. The proportions reported are Kaplan-Meier estimates (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 15

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a0.02
Remdesivir Plus Placebo0.02

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 5

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.21.88.449.126.50.713.30.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62.937.148.611.40.00.00.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.72.78.746.226.30.015.20.2
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.014.758.820.60.00.05.90.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 1

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.00.081.418.60.00.00.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.00.01000.00.00.00.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.00.084.815.20.00.00.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.00.01000.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin

Blood to evaluate total bilirubin was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.08-0.07-0.030.000.09-0.01
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.070.030.100.160.340.01
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.070.000.040.090.03-0.06
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.030.020.04-0.010.130.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR)

Blood to evaluate INR was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.03-0.03-0.070.05-0.09-0.07
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.050.020.010.020.020.00
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.070.090.040.06-0.09-0.10
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-0.08-0.080.020.050.01-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Platelets

Blood to evaluate platelets was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed overall and by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 546.582.196.870.929.456.7
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 638.463.945.220.0-40.052.4
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 557.697.8126.898.933.352.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 658.882.292.061.2-14.54.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophils

Blood to evaluate neutrophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.622-0.3070.1872.069-0.383-1.779
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6-0.324-0.1231.7123.4191.311-1.867
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.3291.0962.5832.6120.165-1.492
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.4790.3232.3121.146-0.004-3.317

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Monocytes

Blood to evaluate monocytes was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.1570.2290.3010.3810.2070.131
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.1120.1360.1470.3650.1070.310
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.1270.2120.3110.4030.2120.114
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.1790.1720.3480.3330.2620.015

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lymphoctyes

Blood to evaluate lymphocytes was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.3010.4920.3900.5360.6550.863
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.2370.2890.2810.3470.3840.575
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.2270.4700.4040.4860.6790.909
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.1370.2420.3770.8670.6420.873

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood to evaluate hemoglobin was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Interventiongrams/deciliter (g/dL) (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.19-0.04-0.34-0.71-0.58-0.39
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6-0.14-0.47-1.13-1.98-3.18-3.89
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.20-0.13-0.29-0.47-0.43-0.13
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-0.10-0.81-1.01-1.32-2.65-1.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils

Blood to evaluate eosinophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.0110.0160.0430.0440.1160.189
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.0140.0370.0280.1170.1350.291
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.0130.0320.0410.0630.1300.172
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.0060.0190.0380.1050.1660.199

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Creatinine

Blood to evaluate serum creatinine was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The measure was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.076-0.122-0.144-0.205-0.049-0.075
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.0540.1210.4150.3610.099-0.182
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.069-0.077-0.109-0.103-0.057-0.029
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 6-0.074-0.0500.005-0.0040.1780.140

[back to top]

Time to an Improvement of Two Categories Using an Ordinal Scale

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Time to improvement by at least two categories was determined for each participant. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionDays (Median)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 513.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6NA
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 513.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 614.0

[back to top]

Time to Discharge or to a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of

The NEW score has demonstrated an ability to discriminate patients at risk of poor outcomes. This score is based on 7 clinical parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, any supplemental oxygen, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, level of consciousness). The NEW Score is being used as an efficacy measure. The minimum score is 0, representing the better outcome, and the maximum value is 19, representing the worse outcome. The time to discharge or a NEWS of less than or equal to 2 was determined for each participant. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionDays (Median)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 54.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 6NA
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 54.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 69.0

[back to top]

Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, but new or increased limitation on activities and/or new or increased requirement for home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

InterventionDays (Median)
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a5.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo5.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)

Blood to evaluate WBC was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. The outcome was assessed by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/liter (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.1660.4861.0373.1450.649-0.470
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.2550.4343.0624.4203.030-0.472
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.7201.8943.5293.6461.211-0.294
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.8560.9083.2613.1531.562-2.123

[back to top]

Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Sex

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, but new or increased limitation on activities and/or new or increased requirement for home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,
InterventionDays (Median)
MaleFemale
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a5.04.5
Remdesivir Plus Placebo5.05.0

[back to top]

Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Race

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, but new or increased limitation on activities and/or new or increased requirement for home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,
InterventionDays (Median)
AsianBlack or African AmericanWhiteOther
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a8.04.04.06.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo8.04.05.05.0

[back to top]

Time to Recovery for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4, 5 and 6 by Ethnicity

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, but new or increased limitation on activities and/or new or increased requirement for home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,
InterventionDays (Median)
Not Hispanic or LatinoHispanic or Latino
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a5.06.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo5.05.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 8

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 8

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.22.74.424.111.90.756.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 65.745.722.914.32.90.08.60.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.92.97.421.09.80.257.80.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 65.911.829.426.58.80.017.60.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in D-dimer Concentration

Blood to evaluate d-dimer concentration was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, and 29

,,,
Interventionmg/L fibrinogen-equivalent units (FEU) (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.1
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62.2-4.0-9.9-10.9-9.1-8.9
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.10.20.20.1-0.10.1
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.50.80.0-0.3-0.3-0.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 3

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 3

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.00.96.074.118.80.20.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.017.180.02.90.00.00.00.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.21.66.373.718.10.00.20.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.05.985.38.80.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 29

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 29

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 53.11.80.72.71.30.065.924.6
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 620.017.15.78.62.90.031.414.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 52.91.60.02.00.70.067.225.7
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 611.80.02.92.92.90.070.68.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 22

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 22

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 52.21.80.74.01.80.048.041.6
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 617.122.98.68.60.00.022.920.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 52.51.60.24.21.60.249.640.2
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 611.80.02.98.82.90.055.917.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 15

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 15

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 51.32.21.16.03.10.453.132.7
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 614.331.48.611.42.90.022.98.6
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 52.03.11.86.02.50.952.531.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 68.85.95.923.50.00.047.18.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Severity Rating on an 8 Point Ordinal Scale at Day 11

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 11

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.93.12.910.05.80.973.92.7
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 68.642.914.35.72.92.922.90.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 51.62.72.912.75.80.470.53.3
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 65.911.814.726.52.90.038.20.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15 for Participants With Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Data was imputed using last observation carried forward or worst possible score based on hospitalization status (2 if not hospitalized, 7 if hospitalized) when there was a change in hospitalization status since last score. Deaths were imputed as an 8. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 15

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Death at or before study visitHospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMOHospitalized, on noninvasive vent./high flow O2Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygenHospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing careHospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req careNot hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 51.32.21.16.03.10.453.132.7
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 52.03.11.86.02.50.952.531.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Discontinuation or Temporary Suspension of Study Product Administration

Discontinuation or temporary suspension of study product administration, including participants who died or were discharged, was evaluated by baseline ordinal scale category (categories 4 and 5 versus category 6). (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 10

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RemdesivirInterferon Beta-1a/Placebo
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 5400337
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62513
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 5382341
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 62219

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Ordinal Scale

The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, but new or increased limitation on activities and/or new or increased requirement for home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 8) Death. A positive change indicates a worsening and a negative change is an improvement. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Day 3Day 5Day 8Day 11Day 15Day 22Day 29
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 50.1-0.1-0.2-0.4-2.5-2.8-2.9
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 60.10.30.30.1-0.8-1.3-1.5
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 50.10.0-0.1-0.4-2.5-2.8-3.0
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 60.0-0.1-0.4-0.6-2.3-2.9-3.2

[back to top]

Duration of Oxygen Use

Duration of oxygen use was measured in days among participants who were on oxygen in based, calculated in two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 566
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62827.5
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 57.57
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 621.520.5

[back to top]

Duration of Non Invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use

Duration of non invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen use was measured in days, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 554
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 664
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 565
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 65.54

[back to top]

Duration of New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use

Duration of new ventilator or ECMO use was measured in days among participants who were not on a ventilator or ECMO at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die. (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 52814
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62319
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 526.514
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 62813.5

[back to top]

Duration of New Oxygen Use

Duration of new oxygen use was measured in days among participants who were not on oxygen at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 533
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 533

[back to top]

Duration of New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use

Duration of new non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen use was measured in days among participants who were not on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen use at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 554
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 565

[back to top]

Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Duration of invasive ventilation was measured in days among participants who required invasive ventilation, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die (NCT04492475)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29

,,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Including imputations for participants who diedAmong participants who did not die
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 4 and 52814
Remdesivir Plus Interferon Beta-1a in Ordinal Score 62319
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 4 and 526.514
Remdesivir Plus Placebo in Baseline Ordinal Score 62813.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline HBV DNA

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Baseline and at pre-specified time points up to 60 weeks

,,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
ABI-H0731 + ETV-2.1-2.5-3.2-3.6-4.2-4.9-5.5-5.8-6.0-6.2-6.2-6.2-6.2-6.5-6.7
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα-2.1-2.6-2.9-3.6-4.1-4.4-5.2-5.6-6.0-6.3-6.2-6.2-6.0-5.8-5.9
ETV + Peg-IFNα-2.2-2.7-3.4-4.0-4.5-5.1-5.6-6.1-6.5-6.7-6.7-6.9-6.7-6.6-6.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Premature Discontinuation of Treatment

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ABI-H0731 + ETV18
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα17
ETV + Peg-IFNα11

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in HBsAg

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Baseline and at pre-specified time points up to 60 weeks

,,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
ABI-H0731 + ETV-.2-.4-.5-.6-.6-.6-.7-.6-.6-.7-1.0-1.1
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα-.1-.4-.2-.2-.5-.5-.5-.4-.2-.1-.1-.1
ETV + Peg-IFNα-.2-.5-.5-.6-.7-.7-.7-.8-.9-.9-1.0-1.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Laboratory Abnormality

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ABI-H0731 + ETV19
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα16
ETV + Peg-IFNα17

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in HBV pgRNA

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Baseline and at pre-specified time points up to 60 weeks

,,
Interventionlog10 U/mL (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
ABI-H0731 + ETV-1.3-1.6-2.0-2.3-2.5-2.7-2.8-2.8-2.7-2.9-3.1-3.3-3.1-4.0-4.2
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα-1.5-1.9-2.2-2.6-2.7-3.0-2.9-3.0-3.3-3.0-3.0-2.9-2.5-3.3-2.4
ETV + Peg-IFNα-.5-.6-.9-1.6-2.0-2.4-2.7-2.5-2.7-3.8-3.2-3.8-3.3-3.0-2.9

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of ABI-H0731

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 24 and at pre-specified time points postdose up to Week 24

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, PredoseDay 1, 2 to 4 hours postdoseWeek 2, 30 min to 2 hours postdoseWeek 4, predoseWeek 8, 30 min to 2 hours postdoseWeek 12, 30 min to 2 hours postdoseWeek 16, 4 to 6 hours postdoseWeek 20, 4 to 6 hours postdoseWeek 24, predoseWeek 24, 30 min to 2 hours postdose
ABI-H0731 + ETV085221302070200019202030221020202070
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα0124017001390156016502200209017301580

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in HBeAg

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Baseline and at pre-specified time points up to 60 weeks

,,
Interventionlog10 IU/mL (Mean)
Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
ABI-H0731 + ETV-.6-.8-1.0-1.1-1.1-1.2-1.4-1.5-1.5-1.8-1.9
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα-.8-.8-.9-1.1-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.1-1.2-1.1-1.1
ETV + Peg-IFNα-.9-1.1-1.2-1.3-1.3-1.4-1.5-1.7-1.8-1.9-2.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in HBcrAg

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Baseline and at pre-specified time points up to 60 weeks

,,
Interventionlog10 kU/mL (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
ABI-H0731 + ETV-.4-.6-.9-1.0-1.1-1.2-1.2-1.3-1.5-1.6-2.0-2.0
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα-.4-.8-.9-1.0-1.2-1.3-1.3-1.2-1.2-1.3-1.3-1.2
ETV + Peg-IFNα-.3-.8-1.1-1.2-1.3-1.4-1.5-1.7-1.9-1.9-2.0-2.0

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of ABI-H0731

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 24 and at pre-specified time points postdose up to Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 24, predoseWeek 24, 30 min to 2 hours postdose
ETV + Peg-IFNα0374

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event

(NCT04781647)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ABI-H0731 + ETV14
ABI-H0731 + ETV + Peg-IFNα17
ETV + Peg-IFNα17

[back to top]