warfarin and Stroke

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are excreted by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and some are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes such as CYP3A4. Although fewer drug interactions are present with NOACs, it is unclear whether NOACs should also be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using pharmacokinetically interacting drugs. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of NOACs versus VKAs was investigated in AF patients treated with P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs.. Using PubMed and Embase, randomized controlled trials and observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in AF patients using P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs were included. A meta-analysis was performed, calculating relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the Mantel-Haenszel method.. Twelve studies were included, investigating 10,793 NOAC and 10,096 VKA users treated with P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, whereas no studies on P-gp and/or CYP450-inducing drugs were identified. Compared to VKAs, NOACs were associated with a borderline non-significantly lower stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risk (RR 0.85, 95%CI (0.72-1.01)), significantly lower intracranial bleeding (RR 0.47, 95%CI (0.34-0.65)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 0.87, 95%CI (0.79-0.95), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 1.74, 95%CI (1.06-2.86)). Among AF patients using amiodarone, NOACs were associated with significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.54-0.93)) and intracranial bleeding risks (RR 0.51, 95%CI (0.29-0.88)), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 2.15, 95%CI (1.24-3.72)) than VKAs.. The benefit-risk profile of NOACs compared to VKAs was preserved in AF patients using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, including amiodarone.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amiodarone; Anticoagulants; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Embolism; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended in adult Fontan patients (Level of Evidence C). We hypothesized that DOACs are comparable to warfarin and do not increase thrombotic and embolic complications (TEs) or clinically significant bleeds.. We reviewed the medical records of adult Fontan patients on DOACs or warfarin at three major medical centers. We identified 130 patients: 48 on DOACs and 107 on warfarin. In total, they were treated for 810 months on DOACs and 5637 months on warfarin.. The incidence of TEs in patients on DOACs compared to those on warfarin was not increased in a statistically significant way (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7 and p value 0.431). Similarly, the incidence of nonmajor and major bleeds in patients on DOACs compared to those on warfarin was also not increased in a statistically significant way (HR for nonmajor bleeds in DOAC patients was 2.8 with a p value of 0.167 and the HR for major bleeds was 2.0 with a p value 0.267). In multivariate analysis, congestive heart failure (CHF) was a risk factor for TEs across both groups (odds ratio [OR] = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-17.6) and bleed history was a risk factor for clinically significant bleeds (OR = 6.8, 95% CI = 2.7-17.2).. In this small, retrospective multicenter study, the use of DOACs did not increase the risk of TEs or clinically significant bleeds compared to warfarin in a statistically significant way.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The data about the efficacy and safety of warfarin usage in atrial fibrillation (AF) in hemodialysis patients is still limited, especially in the Asia population. The population of this study was end-stage renal disease patients with AF who underwent hemodialysis. The design of the study was a retrospective observational cohort that collected the patient data from 2016 to 2019. The Cox regression model was applied to assess the effect of warfarin on the outcomes. We conducted a survival analysis by comparing Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. We also measured the time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator of warfarin usage. Among 444 hemodialysis patients, 126 patients with AF matched the inclusion criteria, 88 patients completely followed up. Half patients used warfarin. The mean age was 52.2 ± 12.97 years, the mean follow-up duration was 11 ± 10 months. We observed all-cause death in 86.4% of patients, ischemic stroke in 10.2%, and hemorrhagic stroke in 2.3% of patients. There were no significant differences in all-cause death, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. Warfarin use was not associated with a lower rate for death (HR 0.782; 95% CI, 0.494-1.237, P = 0.293) or ischemic stroke (HR 0.435; 95% CI, 0.103-1.846, P = 0.259) or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.564; 95% CI, 0.034-9.386, P = 0.689). None of the patients reach the time in the therapeutic range >65%. Our findings suggest that warfarin has no association with mortality, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke events rate in atrial fibrillation patients who underwent hemodialysis in the Indonesian population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Indonesia; Ischemic Stroke; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) mitigate stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aim was to analyze prevalence and predictors of OAC underutilization.. Newly diagnosed AF patients with a CHA. Among 1,204,507 identified AF patients, 617,611 patients (51.3%) were not prescribed an OAC during follow-up (mean: 2.4 years), and 586,896 patients (48.7%) were prescribed an OAC during this period (DOAC: 388,629 [66.2%]; warfarin: 198,267 [33.8%]). Age ≥ 85 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.56), female sex (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.96), Black race (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.77-0.79) and comorbidities such as gastrointestinal (GI; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.41-0.44) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28-0.31) were associated with lower utilization of OACs. Furthermore, age ≥ 85 years (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94), Black race (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.80), ischemic stroke (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.80), GI bleeding (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.77), and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80) predicted lower use of DOACs versus warfarin.. Although OAC therapy prescription is the standard of care for stroke prevention in AF patients, its overall utilization is still low among Medicare patients ≥ 65 years old, with specific patient characteristics that predict underutilization.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are commonly used to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Endorsed by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have displaced warfarin as the OAC of choice for both conditions, due to improved safety profiles, fewer drug-drug and drug-diet interactions, and lack of monitoring requirements. Despite their widespread use and improved safety over warfarin, DOAC-related bleeding remains a major concern for patients. DOACs have stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; however, variability in DOAC response is common and may be attributed to numerous factors, including patient-specific factors, concomitant medications, comorbid conditions, and genetics. Although DOAC randomized controlled trials included patients of varying ages and levels of kidney function, they failed to include patients of diverse ancestries. Additionally, current evidence to support DOAC pharmacogenetic associations have primarily been derived from European and Asian individuals. Given differences in genotype frequencies and disease burden among patients of different biogeographic groups, future research must engage diverse populations to assess and quantify the impact of predictors on DOAC response. Current under-representation of patients from diverse racial groups does not allow for proper generalization of the influence of clinical and genetic factors in relation to DOAC variability. Herein, we discuss factors affecting DOAC response, such as age, sex, weight, kidney function, drug interactions, and pharmacogenetics, while offering a new perspective on the need for further research including frequently excluded groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Humans; Kidney; Pharmacogenetics; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

There is no consensus regarding postoperative anticoagulation after mitral valve repair (MVRep). We compared the outcomes of post-MVRep anticoagulation with apixaban compared to warfarin.. We reviewed data of 666 patients who underwent isolated robotic MVRep between January 2008 and October 2019. We excluded patients who had conversion to sternotomy and those discharged without anticoagulation or on clopidogrel (n = 40). Baseline and intraoperative characteristics and antiplatelet/anticoagulation records were collected. In-hospital and post-discharge complications and overall survival were compared.. Among the 626 studied patients the median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 51-66), 71% were male, and 1% (n = 9) had atrial fibrillation. Eighty percent (n = 499) were discharged on warfarin and 20% on apixaban (n = 127). Almost all patients (126 of 127, 99%) in the apixaban group were also on aspirin at discharge, whereas in the warfarin group only 79% (n = 395) were also on aspirin at discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar, except that the apixaban group had more female patients (46 of 127, 36% vs 136 of 499, 27%, P = .047). There were no differences in in-hospital complications, including stroke. Readmission rate was higher in the apixaban group (15 of 127, 12% vs 30 of 499, 6%, P = .02), driven mostly by postoperative atrial fibrillation (6 of 127 [5%] vs 5 of 499 [1%], respectively; P = .01). There was no difference in other complications (including bleeding and thromboembolic events), or overall mortality within 3 years. Exclusion of patients who did not receive aspirin at discharge did not affect the results.. Anticoagulation with apixaban after minimally invasive robotic MVRep is safe and has similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolism compared to patients treated with warfarin.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve; Patient Discharge; Pyridones; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The fracture risks of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov databases for RCTs, and cohort studies were systematically searched from inception to 10 June 2021.. NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of any fracture and osteoporotic fracture compared to warfarin. This benefit was also observed in specific NOACs types of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, whether NOACs had a less fracture risk than warfarin on the other risk of fractures was still uncertain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Several studies have evaluated the economic evaluation of a group of medications known as novel oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs) in recent years. The aim of this study is to review and systematically analyze the cost-utility studies results of warfarin compared with other NOAC drugs in atrial fibrillation patients.. A systematic review was performed to identify all studies evaluating the NOAC medications in comparison with warfarin. For this purpose, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2013 to 2022. Articles were independently screened with inclusion criteria, and full texts were reviewed. First, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. Then, the costs and outcomes of the studies were analyzed, and findings were appraised critically.. A total of 84 costs-per-quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) cases were extracted from the studies in which the share of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran were 31%, 13%, 29%, and 27%, respectively. The median cost per QALY of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran was 21 910$/QALY, 22 096$/QALY, 17 765$/QALY, and 24 161$/QALY, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on perspective showed that dabigatran had the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and edoxaban had the lowest ICER value. Edoxaban and apixaban had the highest and the lowest cost per QALY from an insurance perspective, respectively.. Despite the differences and variations in the economic evaluation studies of NOAC drugs, these drugs have shown acceptable cost-effectiveness in developed and developing countries. Among NOAC drugs, apixaban has the lowest ICER and the highest cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

There are limited data about the frequency of urgent surgical emergencies among patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs). We conducted a systematic literature review of Medline and EMBASE for published English-language articles of adult patients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K antagonists, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) that reported on patients experiencing unplanned emergent or urgent surgery/procedure or trauma. Randomized trials, observational studies, and case series (50-100 cases) were included. The primary outcome was the frequency of unplanned urgent surgery or invasive procedures among OAC-treated patients with a focus on those not precipitated by the presence of major bleeding. The protocol was not registered. Funding was provided by Covis Pharmaceuticals. The search yielded 1367 potential studies of which 34 were included in the final review. One study reported the rate of urgent surgery/procedures among a large cohort of patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for atrial fibrillation (~ 1% per year). Another study reported the rate of bleeding or urgent surgery among OAC-treated patients experiencing a fracture or trauma (0.489% per patient-year). The remaining 32 studies were cohorts of OAC-treated patients who received reversal or hemostatic therapies for major bleeding or urgent surgery. A median of 28.8% of these patients underwent surgery or invasive procedure. Urgent surgery appears to be a common, yet understudied complication during OAC treatment potentially associated with high rates of adverse outcomes. With increased eligibility for OACs, future studies evaluating the management and outcomes in this setting are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis in patients with a Fontan circulation is unknown.. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin, warfarin, and nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in a network meta-analysis.. Relevant studies published by February 2022 were included. The primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events; major bleeding was a secondary safety outcome. Frequentist network meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of both outcomes. Ranking of treatments was performed based on probability (P) score.. A total of 21 studies were included (26,546 patient-years). When compared with no thromboprophylaxis, NOAC (IRR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.40), warfarin (IRR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.14-0.37), and aspirin (IRR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.15-0.39) were all associated with significantly lower rates of thromboembolic events. However, the network meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in the rates of major bleeding (NOAC: IRR: 1.45 [95% CI: 0.28-7.43]; warfarin: IRR: 1.38 [95% CI: 0.41-4.69]; and aspirin: IRR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.20-2.58]). Rankings, which simultaneously analyze competing interventions, suggested that NOACs have the highest P score to prevent thromboembolic events (P score 0.921), followed by warfarin (P score 0.582), aspirin (P score 0.498), and no thromboprophylaxis (P score 0.001). Aspirin tended to have the most favorable overall profile.. Aspirin, warfarin, and NOAC are associated with lower risk of thromboembolic events. Recognizing the limited number of patients and heterogeneity of studies using NOACs, the results support the safety and efficacy of NOACs in patients with a Fontan circulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fontan Procedure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Limitations of vitamin K antagonists as chronic oral anticoagulant therapy have largely been supplanted by direct factor IIa and factor Xa inhibitor oral anticoagulants with similar efficacy but an overall better safety profile, lack of routine monitoring, and very limited drug-drug interactions compared with agents such as warfarin. However, an increased risk of bleeding remains even with these new-generation oral anticoagulants in fragile patient populations, in patients requiring dual or triple antithrombotic therapy, or high bleed risk surgeries. Epidemiologic data in patients with hereditary factor XI deficiency and preclinical studies support the notion that factor XIa inhibitors have the ability to be an effective but potentially safer alternative to existing anticoagulants, based on their ability to prevent thrombosis directly within the intrinsic pathway without affecting hemostatic mechanisms. As such, various types of factor XIa inhibitors have been studied in early phase clinical studies, including inhibitors of the biosynthesis of factor XIa with antisense oligonucleotides or direct inhibitors of factor XIa using small peptidomimetic molecules, monoclonal antibodies, aptamers, or natural inhibitors. In this review, we discuss how different types of factor XIa inhibitors work and present findings from recently published Phase II clinical trials across multiple indications, including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, dual pathway inhibition with concurrent antiplatelets post-myocardial infarction, and thromboprophylaxis of orthopaedic surgery patients. Finally, we refer to ongoing Phase III clinical trials of factor XIa inhibitors and their potential to provide definitive answers regarding their safety and efficacy in preventing thromboembolic events in specific patient groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Factor XIa; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are thought to be at a higher risk for cerebral infarction and death than patients who are not frail, making preventive interventions important. Anticoagulants should be used in frailty patients with AF. However, there are limited data about anticoagulants in frail patients with AF. Therefore, we concucted this meta-analysis to find the best anticoagulation strategy.. Systematic electronic searches were conducted on 4 July 2022 4 July 2022, in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Relevant and eligible cohort studies were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, we performed a publication bias analysis and subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity.. 3 publications (10 cohorts, 188573 participants) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed that ischemic strokes (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.79;. NOAC was more effective and safety than warfarin in frail patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Frail Elderly; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The administration of an anticoagulant in patients with liver disease (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-NASH, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-NAFLD, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis) who have an indication (atrial fibrillation, venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) is challenging because there is an imbalance between thrombosis and bleeding. There is a need to focus our attention on preventing risk factors because diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, smoking, and sedentary behavior are risk factors for both NASH/NAFLD and AF, and these patients require anticoagulant treatment. Patients with advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh C) were excluded from studies, so vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are still recommended. Currently, VKAs are recommended for other conditions (antiphospholipid syndrome, mitral valve stenosis, and mechanical valve prosthesis). Amongst the patients under chronic anticoagulant treatment, especially for the elderly, bleeding as a result of the improper use of warfarin is one of the important causes of emergency admissions due to adverse reactions. DOACs are considered to be efficient and safe, with apixaban offering superior protection against stroke and a good safety profile as far as major bleeding is concerned compared to warfarin. DOACs are safe in the Child-Pugh A and B classes (except rivaroxaban), and in the Child-Pugh C class are contraindicated. Given that there are certain and reliable data for chronic kidney disease regarding the recommendations, in liver function impairment more randomized studies must be carried out, as the current data are still uncertain. In particular, DOACs have a simple administration, minimal medication interactions, a high safety and effectiveness profile, and now a reversal agent is available (for dabigatran and idarucizumab). Patients are also statistically more compliant and do not require INR monitoring.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have increasingly replaced warfarin for treating patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). DOACs have been demonstrated to be more useful than warfarin, which was highlighted at its ethnic differences in efficacy and safety; however, the regional differences of DOACs remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients from Asian and non-Asian regions with NVAF. We systematically searched randomized control trials published before August 2019. We defined 11 studies comprising 7,118 Asian and 53,282 non-Asian patients, totaling 60,400 patients with NVAF. The risk ratios (RRs) of DOACs were calculated against warfarin. The efficacy of DOACs was significantly higher in Asian regions regarding stroke/systemic embolism events (RR: 0.62 and 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.78 for the Asian region; RR: 0.83 and 95% CI: 0.75-0.92 for non-Asian regions; P interaction: 0.02), when compared with warfarin. The safety of DOACs was significantly higher in Asian regions regarding major bleeding (RR: 0.62 and 95% CI: 0.51-0.75 for Asian regions; RR: 0.90 and 95% CI: 0.76-1.05 for non-Asian regions; P interaction: 0.004), compared with warfarin. In addition, we conducted meta-regression analysis to discuss the true regional differences of DOACs to warfarin. The meta-regression analysis, which adjusts the effect of individual backgrounds in each study, indicated that the regional differences were observed in the efficacy but not in drug safety. These results suggest that treatment with DOACs may be more effective than the conventional warfarin in the Asian region.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Regression Analysis; Stroke; Warfarin

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction which is associated with stroke. There has yet to be a published systematic review that focuses on outcomes for patients with LVT. We conducted a systematic review on treatments, adverse events and thrombus resolution in patients with LVT. Meta-analysis and numerical pooling were used to evaluate the difference in outcomes based on treatment and the presence or absence of LVT. A total of 39 studies were included (5475 patients with LVT and 356 589 patients with no LVT). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with reduced mortality [RR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.97; I2  = 9%] and bleeding (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; I2  = 0%) compared to warfarin but there was a nonsignificant reduction in stroke/embolic events (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19; I2  = 3%). For patients with any treatment, the rate of stroke/embolic events, bleeding and mortality at follow-up of up to 12 months was 6.4, 3.7 and 7.9%, respectively. Pooled results from six studies that evaluated resolution at 6 months suggest that 80% of LVT were resolved. Apixaban was associated with the highest rate of (93.3%) whereas warfarin exhibited the lowest rate of resolution 73.1%. LVT is best managed with DOAC compared to warfarin therapy. An individualized approach to antithrombotic therapy is warranted as there appears to be no duration of therapy that clearly results in the resolution of all cases of LVT so follow-up imaging after discontinuation of anticoagulant is needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

The relative effectiveness of anticoagulation agents in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survive an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. This study was performed to examine the comparative effectiveness of different oral anticoagulation (OAC) on clinical outcomes in this group of patients.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing different OAC (direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] and warfarin) for the treatment of patients with AF who sustained ICH. Outcomes included repeat ICH, thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality. The values derived from the surface under the cumulative ranking curve were obtained to rank the treatment hierarchy.. We identified 12 studies (two RCTs and ten observational studies) involving 23,265 patients; 346 patients were treated with any OAC agents; 5,006 received DOAC; 5,271 received warfarin; 12,007 received antiplatelet or no therapy, and 635 did not received relevant therapy. Both DOAC and warfarin (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98) were superior to antiplatelet or no therapy in preventing thromboembolic events. Moreover, DOAC also showed superiority in preventing thromboembolic events (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.83), repeat ICH (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.67), and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.56) than warfarin.. Our study suggests DOACs may be a reasonable alternative to anti-platelet therapy and warfarin for patients with AF who experienced ICH. However, given the available evidence is primarily observational, further validation by ongoing trials directly comparing these two classes of drugs are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The annual incidence of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795,000 cases per year in the United States, of which 87% are ischemic in nature. In addition to the management of modifiable high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) play an important role in secondary stroke prevention. This review will discuss the published literature on the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), including their pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects. We will also highlight the role of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary stroke prevention, along with supporting literature.. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. However, as shown in recent trials, short-term DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30 days is more effective than SAPT in patients with minor acute non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Although short-term DAPT is highly effective in preventing recurrent stroke, a more prolonged course can increase bleeding risks without additional benefit. DAPT for 90 days, followed by aspirin monotherapy for patients with large vessel intracranial atherosclerotic disease, is suitable for secondary stroke prevention. However, patients need to be monitored for both minor (e.g., bruising) and major (e.g., intracranial) bleeding complications. Conversely, oral warfarin and newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are the agents of choice for secondary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular cardioembolic strokes. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to decreased bleeding risks, including ICH, lack of need for international normalized ratio monitoring, no dietary restrictions, and limited drug-drug interactions. The choice between different antiplatelets and anticoagulants for prevention of ischemic stroke depends on the underlying stroke mechanism, cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms, bleeding risk profile, compliance, drug tolerance, and drug resistance. Physicians must carefully weigh each patient's relative benefits and bleeding risks before initiating an antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment regimen. Further studies are warranted to study the optimal duration of DAPT in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis since the benefit is most pronounced in the short term while the bleeding risk remains high during the extended duration of therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

This review summarizes the evidence for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. LAAC reduces hemorrhagic stroke and mortality versus warfarin, but is inferior for ischemic stroke reduction based on randomized data. Whilst a feasible treatment in OAC-ineligible patients, questions remain over procedural safety, and the improvement in complications observed in nonrandomized registries is uncorroborated by contemporary randomized trials. Management of device-related thrombus and peridevice leak remain unclear, and robust randomized data versus direct OACs are required before recommendations can be made for widespread adoption in OAC-eligible populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The rising prevalence and the complexity of atrial fibrillation (AF) pose major clinical challenges. Stroke prevention is accompanied by non-negligible risks, making anticoagulant treatment an ongoing challenge for the clinician. Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin for stroke prevention in most AF patients, mainly due to the ease of their use. However, assessing the bleeding risk in patients receiving oral anticoagulants remains-particularly in the case of DOACs-highly challenging. Using dose-adjusted warfarin increases threefold the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Although the overall bleeding risk appears to be lower, the use of DOACs has been associated with an increased risk of GIB compared to warfarin. Accurate bleeding (including GIB-specific) risk scores specific for DOACs remain to be developed. Until then, the assessment of bleeding risk factors remains the only available tool, although the extent to which each of these factors contributes to the risk of bleeding is unknown. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the bleeding risk associated with oral anticoagulant therapy in AF patients, with a highlight on the latest insights into GIB associated with oral anticoagulation; we emphasize questions that remain to be answered; and we identify hotspots for future research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Findings of prior studies about the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients (≥80 years of age) with atrial fibrillation (AF) are controversial. So we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients (≥80 years of age) with AF. A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese BioMedical databases was conducted until 1 October 2022. Studies reporting the effects and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in patients (≥80 years of age) with AF were included. Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through an independent third reviewer. Data were synthesised according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. We identified 15 studies providing data of 70 446 participants (≥80 years of age) suffering from AF. According to the meta-analysis (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, CI)), NOACs conferred better efficacy profile than VKAs in stroke and systemic embolism (0.8 (0.73-0.88)) and all-cause mortality (0.61 (0.57-0.65)). Otherwise, NOACs conferred a better safety profile than VKAs in major bleeding (0.76 (0.70-0.83)) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH; 0.57 (0.47-0.68)). In conclusion, for patients (≥80 years of age) with AF, the risks of stroke and systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, were lower in NOACs compared to warfarin. The risks of major bleeding and ICH were also lower in NOACs compared to warfarin. NOACs showed better efficacy and safety than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.. To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.. Scoping review.. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.. Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.. OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Thromboembolic events (TEE) associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are highly recurrent and usually severe, causing permanent disability or, even, death. Previous data consistently showed significantly lower TEE in anticoagulated patients. While warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is still used worldwide, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin in the prevention of TEE, and represent, to date, the preferred treatment. DOACs present favorable pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profiles, especially among vulnerable patients including the elderly, those with renal dysfunction or previous TEE. Yet, regarding specific settings of AF patients it is unclear whether oral anticoagulation therapy is beneficial, or otherwise it is the maintenance of sinus rhythm, mostly achieved through a catheter ablation-based rhythm control strategy, that prevents the causal complications linked to AF. While it is known that low-risk patients [CHA2DS2-VASc 0 (males), or score of 1 (females)] present low ischemic stroke or mortality rates (<1%/year), it remains unclear whether they need any prophylaxis. Furthermore, the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for those individuals requiring cardioversion, either pharmacologic or electric, as well as peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing trans-catheter ablation that nowadays encompasses different energies, are still a matter of debate. In addition, AF concomitant with other clinical conditions is discussed and, lastly, the choice of prescribing anticoagulation to asymptomatic patients diagnosed with subclinical AF at either wearable or implanted devices. The aim of this review will be to provide an update on current strategies in the above-mentioned settings, and to suggest possible therapeutic options, finally focusing on AF-related cognitive decline.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; Male; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for older adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Pairwise and network meta-analyses.. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for published randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational studies evaluating the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for the prevention of stroke. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings.. This study included 38 studies enrolling 1,022,908 older adult patients with AF. Results from pairwise meta-analyses showed that NOACs were superior to warfarin for all outcomes, except that dabigatran increased the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of SSE and ischemic stroke than warfarin or NOACs. Results of network meta-analyses indicated that apixaban significantly reduced the risk of SSE, major bleedings, and GI bleedings than warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran showed lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin and of intracranial bleeding than rivaroxaban.. NOACs are of at least equal efficacy, or even superior to warfarin. The safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different, as apixaban performs better than the other oral anticoagulants in reducing major bleeding and GI bleeding, whereas dabigatran increased the risk of GI bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Infective endocarditis (IE) carries a high risk of vascular complications (e.g., cerebral embolism, intracerebral hemorrhage, and renal infarction), which are correlated with increased early and late mortality. Although anticoagulation is the cornerstone for management of thromboembolic complications, it remains controversial and challenging in patients with IE. An appropriate anticoagulation strategy is crucial to improving outcomes and requires a good understanding of the indication, timing, and regimen of anticoagulation in the setting of IE. Observational studies have shown that anticoagulant treatment failed to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patents with IE, supporting that IE alone is not an indication for anticoagulation. In the absence of randomized controlled trials and high-quality meta-analyses, however, current guidelines on IE were based largely on observational data and expert opinion, providing few specific recommendations on anticoagulation. A multidisciplinary approach and patient engagement are required to determine the timing and regimen of anticoagulation in patients with IE, especially in specific situations (e.g., receiving warfarin anticoagulation at the time of IE diagnosis, cerebral embolism or ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or urgent surgery). Collectively, individualized strategies on anticoagulation management of IE should be based on clinical evaluation, available evidence, and patient engagement, and ultimately be developed by the multidisciplinary team.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Endocarditis; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Stroke; Warfarin

Although guidelines give preference to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), DOACs are not recommended in those with rheumatic heart disease or mechanical heart valves. The results of the INVICTUS trial (Investigation of Rheumatic AF Treatment Using Vitamin K Antagonists, Rivaroxaban or Aspirin Studies), which compared rivaroxaban with a VKA in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated AF, and the PROACT Xa trial (A Trial to Determine if Participants with an On-X Aortic Valve Can be Maintained Safely on Apixaban), which compared apixaban with warfarin in patients with an On-X valve in the aortic position, support the use of VKAs for these indications. In this paper, we review the results of these trials, provide perspective on why VKAs were superior to DOACs, and discuss future directions for anticoagulation in these disorders.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyridones; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Carotid artery stenosis is narrowing of the carotid arteries. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is when this narrowing occurs in people without a history or symptoms of this disease. It is caused by atherosclerosis; that is, the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls. Atherosclerosis is more likely to occur in people with several risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and smoking. As this damage can develop without symptoms, the first symptom can be a fatal or disabling stroke, known as ischaemic stroke. Carotid stenosis leading to ischaemic stroke is most common in men older than 70 years. Ischaemic stroke is a worldwide public health problem.. To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in preventing neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, death, major bleeding, and other outcomes.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trials registers from their inception to 9 August 2022. We also checked the reference lists of any relevant systematic reviews identified and contacted specialists in the field for additional references to trials.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status and language, comparing a pharmacological intervention to placebo, no treatment, or another pharmacological intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the trials. A third author resolved disagreements when necessary. We assessed the evidence certainty for key outcomes using GRADE.. We included 34 RCTs with 11,571 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from only 22 studies with 6887 participants. The mean follow-up period was 2.5 years. None of the 34 included studies assessed neurological impairment and quality of life. Antiplatelet agent (acetylsalicylic acid) versus placebo Acetylsalicylic acid (1 study, 372 participants) may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.47), stroke-related mortality (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.59), progression of carotid stenosis (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71), and adverse events (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.59), compared to placebo (all low-certainty evidence). The effect of acetylsalicylic acid on major bleeding is very uncertain (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.53; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure neurological impairment or quality of life. Antihypertensive agents (metoprolol and chlorthalidone) versus placebo The antihypertensive agent, metoprolol, may result in no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to1.16; 1 study, 793 participants) and stroke-related mortality (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.94; 1 study, 793 participants) compared to placebo (both low-certainty evidence). However, chlorthalidone may slow the progression of carotid stenosis (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.91; 1 study, 129 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. Neither study measured neurological impairment, major bleeding, adverse events, or quality of life. Anticoagulant agent (warfarin) versus placebo The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of warfarin (1 study, 919 participants) on major bleeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46; very low-certainty evidence), but it may reduce adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. The study did not measure neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, stroke-related mortality, progression of carotid stenosis, or quality of life. Lipid-lowering agents (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, probucol, and rosuvastatin) versus placebo or no treatment Lipid-lowering agents may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (atorvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.53; 5 studies, 2235 participants) stroke-related mortality (lovastatin and pravastatin; RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03. Although there is no high-certainty evidence to support pharmacological intervention, this does not mean that pharmacological treatments are ineffective in preventing ischaemic cerebral events, morbidity, and mortality. High-quality RCTs are needed to better inform the best medical treatment that may reduce the burden of carotid stenosis. In the interim, clinicians will have to use other sources of information.. پیشینه: تنگی شریان کاروتید عبارت است از باریک شدن شریان‌های کاروتید. تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه زمانی است که این تنگی در افراد بدون سابقه یا نشانه‌های این بیماری رخ می‌دهد. این عارضه ناشی از آترواسکلروز (atherosclerosis) است؛ یعنی تجمع چربی، کلسترول و دیگر مواد داخل و روی دیواره‌های شریان. احتمال بروز آترواسکلروز در افرادی که عوامل خطر متعددی دارند، مانند دیابت، هیپرتانسیون، هیپرلیپیدمی و مصرف سیگار، بیشتر است. از آنجایی که این آسیب می‌تواند بدون نشانه ایجاد شود، اولین نشانه می‌تواند یک سکته مغزی کشنده یا ناتوان کننده باشد که به عنوان سکته مغزی ایسکمیک شناخته می‌شود. تنگی کاروتید منجر به وقوع سکته مغزی ایسکمیک در مردان بالای 70 سال شایع‌تر رخ می‌دهد. سکته مغزی ایسکمیک یک مشکل سلامت عمومی در سراسر جهان است. اهداف: ارزیابی تاثیرات مداخلات دارویی در درمان تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه به منظور پیشگیری از بروز‌اختلالات نورولوژیکی، سکته مغزی ماژور یا ناتوان کننده یک طرفه (ipsilateral)، مرگ‌ومیر، خونریزی شدید، و دیگر پیامدها. روش‌های جست‌وجو: پایگاه ثبت کارآزمایی‌های گروه سکته مغزی (stroke) در کاکرین، CENTRAL؛ MEDLINE؛ Embase؛ دو بانک اطلاعاتی دیگر، و سه پایگاه ثبت کارآزمایی را از زمان شروع به کار تا 9 آگوست 2022 جست‌وجو کردیم. هم‌چنین فهرست منابع مرورهای سیستماتیک مرتبط را که شناسایی شدند، بررسی کرده و برای یافتن منابع بیشتر برای کارآزمایی‌ها با متخصصان این زمینه تماس گرفتیم. معیارهای انتخاب: همه کارآزمایی‌های تصادفی‌سازی و کنترل شده (randomised controlled trials; RCTs) را بدون در نظر گرفتن وضعیت انتشار و زبان نگارش مقاله وارد کردیم، که به مقایسه یک مداخله دارویی با دارونما (placebo)، عدم درمان، یا مداخله دارویی دیگر در درمان تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه پرداختند. گردآوری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها: از پروسیجرهای استاندارد روش‌شناسی (methodology) کاکرین استفاده کردیم. دو نویسنده مرور به‌طور مستقل از هم به استخراج داده‌ها و ارزیابی خطر سوگیری (bias) در کارآزمایی‌ها پرداختند. در صورت لزوم، نویسنده سوم اختلاف‌نظرات را حل‌وفصل کرد. قطعیت شواهد را برای پیامدهای کلیدی با استفاده از رویکرد درجه‌بندی توصیه، ارزیابی، توسعه و ارزشیابی (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; GRADE) ارزیابی کردیم. نتایج اصلی: تعداد 34 RCT را با 11,571 شرکت‌کننده وارد کردیم. برای انجام متاآنالیز، داده‌هایی از فقط 22 مطالعه با 6887 شرکت‌کننده در دسترس بودند. میانگین دوره پیگیری 2.5 سال بود. هیچ یک از 34 مطالعه وارد شده اختلالات نورولوژیکی و کیفیت زندگی را ارزیابی نکردند. عامل ضد پلاکت (استیل‌سالیسیلیک اسید) در برابر دارونما استیل‌سالیسیلیک اسید (acetylsalicylic acid) در مقایسه با دارونما (1 مطالعه، 372 شرکت‌کننده) ممکن است تفاوتی اندک تا عدم تفاوت را در سکته مغزی ماژور یا ناتوان ک

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Atorvastatin; Carotid Stenosis; Chlorthalidone; Fluvastatin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Metoprolol; Pravastatin; Probucol; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Stroke; Warfarin

Pivotal trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) against warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) predominantly involved patients with high stroke risk. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC versus warfarin in patients with low stroke risk. An online literature search was conducted to retrieve studies comparing clinical outcomes between patients treated with DOAC versus warfarin for AF, reporting outcomes for patients at low or minimal risk of stroke (CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Advancing age is a risk factor for developing non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed the comparative effectiveness, safety, costs, and healthcare utilization associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients of advanced age managed in the United States (US).. We conducted a systematic review of Medline and Embase through April 2023 to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies of older adults (at least 65+ years of age) with either NVAF or VTE who received either rivaroxaban or warfarin in the US and reported an outcome of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke (IS), recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, costs, or healthcare resource utilization. We classified each outcome of interest per study as "positive" (lower risk), "negative" (higher risk), or "neutral" based upon the summary effect size of rivaroxaban versus warfarin.. Twenty-nine RWE studies met inclusion criteria, mostly (83%) in NVAF populations. For SSE with rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 68.8% of studies showed positive effects and 31.2% showed neutral outcome. For major bleeding, 57.7% showed neutral effects, 38.5% showed negative effects, and 3.8% of studies showed positive effects with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. Of the two studies reporting cost data, both were positive, showing lower costs for SSE for rivaroxaban versus warfarin and neutral cost for major bleeding costs.. This systematic review supports findings from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials that, compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban is associated with generally neutral or positive effects on thrombosis and a mixed picture on bleeding outcomes in older adults with either NVAF or VTE treated in the United States.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The conjunction of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in clinical practice. Over the last 2 decades, a significant number of articles (2500) have been published about AF and VTE. To effectively analyze and present these vast amounts of information, this study uses bibliometric research methods to categorize and consolidate these publications. The number of publications has increased yearly, especially since 2012. The United States was the most prolific country, with 1054 studies published. The most productive institution was McMaster University. Gregory Y.H. Lip was the most prolific author. The keyword analysis identified that the research focuses from 2003 to 2014 were factor Xa inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, direct thrombin inhibitor, double-blind, deep vein thrombosis, molecular weight heparin, stroke prevention, etc. From 2015 to 2016, research mainly focused on venous thromboembolism, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, warfarin, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Studies during 2017 to 2022 focused on apixaban, direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, hemorrhage, edoxaban, medicine efficacy and safety, risk factors, clinical management, and vitamin K antagonists. Since 2018, novel oral anticoagulants have been the most commonly used keywords. On the whole, most studies of AF and VTE focus on pathogenesis and therapeutic drugs. The causal relationship between AF and VTE, the effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in the treatments, the anticoagulant regimen of AF and VTE co-disease, and the treatment regimen for vulnerable populations such as the elderly or obese people were the focus of current research and will continue to be the central point of future research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Limited real-world data show that rivaroxaban following dosage criteria from either ROCKET AF [20 mg/day or 15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min] or J-ROCKET AF (15 mg/day or 10 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min) is associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with each other in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We are aimed to study whether these observations differ between Asian and non-Asian subjects.. A systematic review and meta-analysis with random effects was conducted to estimate the aggregate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using PubMed and MEDLINE databases from 8 September 2011 to 31 December 2022 searched for adjusted observational studies that reported relevant clinical outcomes of NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg/day if CrCl > 50 mL/min, on-label dose rivaroxaban eligible for ROCKET AF or J-ROCKET AF, and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min. Effectiveness and safety endpoints were compared between ROCKET AF and J-ROCKET AF dosing regimen in Asian and non-Asian subjects, separately. Also, risks of events of rivaroxaban 10 mg/day despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min were compared to that of 'ROCKET AF/J-ROCKET AF dosing'. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequential elimination of each study from the pool. The meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the influence of potential factors on the effectiveness and safety outcomes. Eighteen studies involving 67 571 Asian and 54 882 non-Asian patients were included. Rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism in the Asian subgroup, whereas rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR:1.30; 95% CI:1.05-1.60) compared with that of ROCKET AF criteria in the non-Asian population. There were no differences in risks of major bleeding between rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF vs. ROCKET AF criteria either in the Asian or non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism (HR:1.64; 95% CI:1.28-2.11) but lower risk of major bleeding (HR:0.72; 95% CI:0.57-0.90) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the risks of thromboembolism (HR:1.32; 95% CI:1.09-1.59), mortality (HR:1.33; 95% CI:1.10-1.59), and major bleeding (HR:1.26; 95% CI:1.03-1.53) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The pooled results were generally in line with the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes by removing a single study at one time. Meta-regression analyses failed to detect the bias in most potential patient characteristics associated with the clinical outcomes.. Rivaroxaban dosing regimen following J-ROCKET criteria may serve as an alternative to ROCKET AF criteria for the Asian population with NVAF, whereas the dosing regimen following ROCKET AF criteria was more favourable for the non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of major bleeding, while use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse outcome in most clinical events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Off-Label Use; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants, including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants, are the standard of care for thrombosis prevention and treatment; however, concerns of bleeding often dictate treatment decisions. Inhibition of the intrinsic coagulation system via factor XIa may allow for selective inhibition of the coagulation cascade without significantly impacting hemostasis after injury. Asundexian is an oral small molecule factor XIa inhibitor that, via this novel mechanism, may prove to be a safe and effective option compared with available anticoagulants. Early clinical data for asundexian was promising as a safer alternative to current therapies and prompted further analysis in certain patient populations at increased thrombotic risk. Currently, studies are ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and in patients following an acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack.. Current oral anticoagulants have been shown to be effective for treating and preventing different clotting conditions. The disadvantage associated with these agents is an increased risk of bleeding; thus, there is a need for safer alternatives. Asundexian is a new anticoagulant that has been studied in patients after a stroke, patients with abnormal heart rhythms and patients after a heart attack in three completed clinical trials and two that are currently ongoing. Asundexian works by blocking factor XI, which is necessary for clot formation. Asundexian appears to be a promising option for preventing and treating thrombotic conditions while potentially limiting the risk of bleeding as a result of its distinct mechanism of action. The following summary explains how asundexian works and highlights the key studies showing the effects of this medication.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor XIa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Evidence on the association between the risk of new-onset osteoporosis and oral anticoagulants remains controversial. We aimed to compare the risk of osteoporosis associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with that associated with warfarin use.. Studies published up to 15 March 2023 that investigated the association between the use of DOACs and warfarin and the incidence of osteoporosis were identified by online searches in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science conducted by two independent investigators. Random-effects or fixed-effect models were employed to synthesize hazard ratios (HRs)/relative ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for estimating the risk of osteoporosis correlated with DOAC and warfarin prescriptions (PROSPERO No. CRD42023401199).. Our meta-analysis ultimately included four studies involving 74,338 patients. The results suggested that DOAC use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of new-onset osteoporosis than warfarin use (pooled HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.88,. DOAC users experienced a lower incidence of osteoporosis than warfarin users. This study may give us insight into safe anticoagulation strategies for patients who are at high risk of developing osteoporosis.. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023401199.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Osteoporosis; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a common manifestation of cardiac arrhythmia, whose significance is heightened in the context of an aging global population and changing lifestyles, leading to an increased incidence. Stroke prevention in NVAF is a complex challenge that requires a comprehensive exploration of interventions. The emergence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) is a potential treatment, necessitating a  thorough evaluation of their safety and efficacy. As the quest for the best strategy for thrombotic risk in these patients continues, the interaction between DOAC and aspirin has become the focus of research.. With a rigorous methodological approach, we conducted a thorough search of scientific databases up to August 2023. The methodology involved meticulous screening, careful data extraction, and rigorous assessment of trial quality, all conducted by two independent investigators. The results were synthesized through standardized mean differences, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals.. DOACs demonstrated significant enhancements in stroke prevention for NVAF, which was indicated by favorable outcomes in bleeding (RR = 4.04, 95% CI: 3.96, 4.12), coronary artery disease (RR = 2.45, 95% CI: 2.42, 2.48), mortality (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.56), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.81, 1.88), and stroke (RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.47, 1.54). Notably, DOACs demonstrated optimal efficacy for NVAF patients with stroke.. DOACs may be potentially effective for preventing stroke after NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Global treatment guidelines recommend treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and an elevated stroke risk. However, not all patients with NVAF and an elevated stroke risk receive guideline-recommended therapy. A literature review and synthesis of observational studies were undertaken to identify the body of evidence on untreated and undertreated NVAF and the association with clinical and economic outcomes.. An extensive search (1/2010-4/2020) of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings, and health technology assessments (HTAs) was conducted. Studies must have evaluated rates of nontreatment or undertreatment in NVAF. Nontreatment was defined as absence of OACs (but with possible antiplatelet treatment), while undertreatment was defined as treatment with only antiplatelet agents.. Sixteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Rates of nontreatment for patients with elevated stroke risk ranged from 2.0-51.1%, while rates of undertreatment ranged from 10.0-45.1%. The clinical benefits of anticoagulation were reported in the evaluated studies with reductions in stroke and mortality outcomes observed among patients treated with anticoagulants compared to untreated or undertreated patients. Adverse events associated with all bleeding types (i.e. hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding or gastrointestinal hemorrhaging) were found to be higher for warfarin patients compared to untreated patients in real-world practice. Healthcare resource utilization was found to be lower among patients highly-adherent to warfarin compared to untreated patients.. Rates of nontreatment and undertreatment among NVAF patients remain high and are associated with preventable cardiovascular events and death. Strategies to increase rates of treatment may improve clinical outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin, as most commonly used vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), was done to evaluate their effect on stroke risk and bleeding complications in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The study aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin between patients < 75 years and ≥ 75 years old. Prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs with warfarin with at least 1-year follow-up in nonvalvular AF patients were included. Search was done at MEDLINE, without time and language restriction. "Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool" was used to assess risk of bias. In meta-analysis, random effect model was used. Q statistics was used to assess heterogeneity where it was indicated and I

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

evidence on the difference in fracture risks for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin remains controversial. We aim to compare the fracture risks between the DOAC and warfarin prescriptions among the AF patients.. we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to 19 April 2021 for relevant studies. And the observational studies regarding the relationship between the DAOC versus warfarin prescriptions and fracture risks among the patients with AF were included in this meta-analysis. Two investigators independently screened the articles and extracted the relevant data. A random- or fixed-effect model was applied to calculate the pooled hazard ratio/relative ratios with 95% confidence intervals of fracture risks associated with the DOAC and warfarin prescriptions. Six studies comprising 351,208 patients and 9,424 fractures were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the AF patients treated with DOACs tend to present a lower risk of any fracture compared with those treated with warfarin (relative ratio: 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.91). Sub-analyses for each individual DOAC indicate that apixaban and rivaroxan are associated with lower risk of any fracture compared with warfarin (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.92, and HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, respectively).. this meta-analysis suggests that DOAC users have a lower risk of fractures than the warfarin users. The results of this study may provide optimal anticoagulation opportunities for AF patients with high fracture risk factors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with a Fontan circulation for single-ventricle physiology are at increased risk of developing thromboembolic events. Thromboembolic events can lead to failure of the Fontan circulation, chronic sequelae in case of stroke, and early mortality. Controversies exist regarding the substrates, risk factors, and optimal detection methods for thromboembolic events. Despite the major clinical implications, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy to prevent or treat thromboembolic events after the Fontan procedure. In this review we aimed to untangle the available literature regarding antithrombotic prophylaxis and treatment for pediatric and adult Fontan patients. A decision-tree algorithm for thromboprophylaxis in Fontan patients is proposed. Additionally, the current state of knowledge is reviewed with respect to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and detection of thromboembolic events in Fontan patients, and important evidence gaps are highlighted.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Child; Fontan Procedure; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Adverse effects of drugs are one of the objective criteria used for choosing the most appropriate anticoagulant. It is worrying that warfarin may be involved in the progression of systemic atherosclerosis, as more and more articles suggest. Warfarin has been widely used in the past and has greater efficacy compared to dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves; there is an antidote to it and it is cheap. Unfortunately, warfarin inhibits the synthesis and activity of Matrix-Gla-Protein, which is the major vitamin K-dependent inhibitor of arterial calcification - an active process associated with atherosclerosis, stimulated by inflammatory mechanisms. Vitamin K antagonizes the NF-κB signaling mechanism and contributes to the prevention of arterial calcifications. Warfarin given in experimental animal models of atherosclerosis contributed to the occurrence of an increased number of aortic calcifications. Warfarin treatment used in clinical trials was associated with the progressive increase of coronary atheroma calcification. Younger patients are more sensitive to warfarin-related arterial calcifications compared to older patients, due to warfarin-induced cellular senescence changes. Non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants do not interact with vitamin K. Edoxaban reduces the inflammatory process in the vascular walls and the proliferation of smooth vascular muscle cells, so it is involved in the prevention of vascular maladaptive remodeling process. Apixaban is able to stabilize the coronary atherosclerotic process. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of warfarin on plaque stability and cardiovascular evolution of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atherosclerosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) require oral anticoagulation to prevent ischemic stroke. However, oral anticoagulation may cause bleeding, and patients with AF and a history of bleeding were excluded from pivotal trials comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and a history of bleeding.. We conducted a systematic review of retrospective studies and clinical trials using the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to May 2021.. Overall, 56,697 patients from six studies were included. NOACs significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.91; p = 0.005), fatal ischemic stroke (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.61; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98; p = 0.04), major bleeding events (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84; p < 0.001), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.82; p < 0.001), fatal ICH (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.56, p < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96; p = 0.01).. NOACs showed better efficacy and safety profile compared with warfarin in patients with AF and a history of bleeding. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The objective of present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of resuming direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception until 2 June 2021 for observational cohort studies in patients with AF, who resumed VKAs or DOACs after a history of GIB. Studies that reported data on clinical outcomes including risk of recurrent GIB, thromboembolic events, or all-cause mortality were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% credible intervals (CIs), using a random effects model in a Bayesian framework.. A total of 10 studies were included in the final analysis, including 59,244 AF patients with prior GIB, of whom 27,793 resumed DOACs, 24,635 resumed warfarin, and 6816 did not resume anticoagulation. Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of warfarin was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), but no increased risk of recurrent GIB was found with resumption of DOACs (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88-1.71); among individual DOACs, only rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.65). Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of DOACs and warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84; HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), but no statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2; HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.55-1.29).. In AF patients with prior GIB, resumption of DOACs may be safer, except for rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This review summarizes the evidence for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. LAAC reduces hemorrhagic stroke and mortality versus warfarin, but is inferior for ischemic stroke reduction based on randomized data. Whilst a feasible treatment in OAC-ineligible patients, questions remain over procedural safety, and the improvement in complications observed in nonrandomized registries is uncorroborated by contemporary randomized trials. Management of device-related thrombus and peridevice leak remain unclear, and robust randomized data versus direct OACs are required before recommendations can be made for widespread adoption in OAC-eligible populations.

Topics: Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Left ventricular thrombi (LVTs) increase the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and subsequent death. Current guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as first-line treatment for LVT. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used as alternatives to warfarin for the treatment of LVT. However, the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs remain controversial. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of DOACs versus VKAs for LVT treatment. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published before December 11, 2021. The relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each study. The meta-analysis included 12 cohort studies and 3 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2334 patients. We found that DOACs had a lower risk of clinically significant bleeding than VKAs (RR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in LVT resolution (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.48; I2 = 0%), stroke and/or systematic embolic events (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.11 to 1.55; P = 0.2; I2 = 30%), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.4; P = 0.65; I2 = 0%). Overall, DOACs are noninferior to warfarin in LVT treatment but have a lower risk of clinically significant bleeding. This suggests that DOACs might be better alternatives to warfarin for LVT treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence regarding their role in patients with AF and concurrent valvular heart disease (VHD) continues to evolve.. Post hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials suggest that DOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF and VHD. Emerging evidence from observational data showed a favorable benefit-risk profile for DOACs compared to warfarin in patients with AF and VHD. DOACs are an attractive option for the treatment of patients with AF and VHD who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to warfarin therapy. Future studies are needed to evaluate their effectiveness, safety, and examine variability in the direction and magnitude of treatment effects in selected VHD subgroups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Relatively little is known about the influence of extreme body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety of drugs used in many disease states. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have an advantage over warfarin in that they do not require routine drug monitoring, some may regard this convenience as less compelling in obese patients. Some consensus guidelines discourage using DOACs in patients weighing > 120 kg or with a body mass index > 35-40 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Obesity; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyridones; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The frequent coexistence in daily clinical practice of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in the elderly, represents a conundrum for physicians, mainly related to the management of anticoagulant therapy. The reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) impairs anticoagulant clearance, increasing bleeding propensity. Moreover, dysfunctional responses of endothelial cells and inflammatory systems both trigger thromboembolic status. Those mechanisms pose an increased risk of adverse events for AF patients with CKD. While several data suggested the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin as preferred anticoagulant strategy in patients with Stage 3A to Stage 4 CKD (eGFR range of 15-49 mL/min/1.73 m2), less is known about the optimal anticoagulation management in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Furthermore, a pivotal feature to be considered when choosing the anticoagulant drug in CKD patients is represented by nephroprotective capability. Indeed, anticoagulant therapy with warfarin showed detrimental effects on kidney function, whereas DOACs demonstrated a beneficial effect on renal function preservation. Mounting data showed that, when pharmacological treatment cannot be pursued due to contraindication to anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may represent a valid alternative. This brief review outlines the current knowledge regarding anticoagulation therapy in ESRD/RRT patients, reporting new lines of evidence on the nephroprotective effect of oral anticoagulants and on the use of LAAO as a non-pharmacological alternative to oral anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Warfarin

The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has illustrated that the efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is inferior compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, though they are still frequently prescribed for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants by carrying out a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled tri- als and cohort studies.. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE were sys- tematically searched from the inception to September 9, 2021, for randomized controlled trials or cohorts that compared the efficacy and/or safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the random-effect model.. Nineteen publications involving 371 574 Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included. Compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants showed compa- rable risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.42), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.21), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.31), though had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.71). Compared with warfarin, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79), mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75), intracranial hemor- rhage (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.69), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93).. Low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were superior to warfarin, and comparable to standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagu- lants considering risks of stroke, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastroin- testinal hemorrhage. Further, high qualified studies are warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used as anticoagulation therapy in the postoperative period. However, their effectiveness in post-cardiac surgical atrial fibrillation is yet to be determined.. We conducted a meta-analysis, searching three international databases from 1 January 2003 to 26 January 2022 for studies reporting on DOACs in at least 10 adult patients (>18 yr of age) with post-cardiac surgical atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes were major neurological events and bleeding; secondary outcomes were mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, cost, and other complications from therapy. We included studies of any design, including RCTs, cohort studies with and without propensity score matching methods, and single-armed case series.. DOACs reduced bleeding and major neurological events in patients with post-cardiac surgical atrial fibrillation, appearing safer than warfarin in this context. However, which specific DOAC provides the most effective anticoagulation in this patient population needs further investigation.. PROSPERO CRD42021282777.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Stroke; Warfarin

For patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH), the decision to offer oral anticoagulation (OAC) is challenging and necessitates balancing risk of thromboembolic events with risk of recurrent ICrH.. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and safety of OAC and/or antiplatelets in patients with atrial fibrillation with nontraumatic ICrH. Bibliographic databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched. Articles on adults with atrial fibrillation with spontaneous ICrH (intracerebral, subdural, and subarachnoid), receiving antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention were eligible for inclusion.. Twenty articles (50 470 participants) included 2 randomized controlled trials (n=304)' 8 observational studies, 8 cohort studies, and 2 studies that meta-analyzed individual-level data from observational studies. OAC therapy was associated with a significant reduction in thromboembolic events (summary relative risk [sRR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.30-0.86], heterogeneity I. In nontraumatic ICrH survivors with atrial fibrillation, OAC therapy is associated with a reduced risk of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality without significantly increasing risk of recurrent ICrH. This finding is primarily based on observational data, and further larger randomized controlled trials are needed to corroborate or refute these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In the pivotal WATCHMAN trials, warfarin was used for post-procedural anticoagulation in the first 45 days after left atrial appendage closure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus warfarin after WATCHMAN. We performed a literature search of 5 electronic databases to identify studies comparing DOAC with warfarin after WATCHMAN. We pooled outcomes for the efficacy (thromboembolism, device-related thrombus [DRT], peridevice leak [PDL] >5 mm) and safety endpoints (bleeding, mortality). Thromboembolism was defined as ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. We included 10 cohort studies with 2,440 patients, of whom 1,397 (57.3%) received DOAC. Concerning periprocedural outcomes (within 7 days following implantation), DOAC was associated with a reduction in major bleeding (Risk ratio [RR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.92) compared with warfarin, without significant differences in all bleeding (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.15-1.42) and thromboembolism (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.21-4.16). On first follow-up transesophageal echocardiography, DRT (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.39-1.60) and PDL>5 mm (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.16-1.20) were comparable among groups. With a mean follow-up of 1.5-12 months, DOAC was associated with reductions in major bleeding (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.89) and all bleeding (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.25-0.58) compared with warfarin. The outcomes of thromboembolism (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.36-1.73) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.19-1.28) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Following WATCHMAN implantation, DOAC was associated with reductions in major bleeding and all bleeding compared with warfarin at mid-term follow-up. The outcomes of thromboembolism, all-cause mortality, DRT, and PDL >5 mm were comparable among groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with cancer are at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently there are no definitive data on clinical outcomes for nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) and warfarin in cancer patients with AF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin. A search through Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library was done from the databases inception to March 2022. Studies that compared NOACs to warfarin in the setting of AF and cancer were included. The primary outcomes were the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), intracranial bleeding, and Major gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to report the outcomes. A total of 11 studies were included. We found that NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding and combined ischemic stroke/SE in patients with AF and cancer compared with warfarin (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.75, P < 0.0001 and RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.47-0.75, P < 0.0001, respectively). Also, there was lower incidence of Intracranial and major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who received NOACs compared with warfarin (P < 0.0001). Network analyses revealed that apixaban and dabigatran were associated with reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Among patients who diagnosed with AF and cancer, NOACs were associated with lower incidence of major bleeding ischemic stroke/SE compared with warfarin. Furthermore, NOACs were associated with lower gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The most frequent arrhythmia treated is atrial fibrillation (AF), which necessitates the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) to reduce the risk of thromboembolism and stroke. Patients with chronic kidney disease are more likely to develop AF, with a 10% frequency among those on chronic dialysis. Warfarin is the most widely prescribed OAC for individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). On the other hand, direct OACs (DOACs) are generally safer than warfarin, with fewer fatal bleeding events and a fixed dose that does not require close international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. For those patients, warfarin and apixaban appear to be FDA-approved, whereas dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban are not recommended yet. Due to a lack of large randomized studies, data from major trials cannot be extended to dialysis patients. In this review, we summarize the available data and literature referring to patients on chronic hemodialysis with concomitant AF. Due to the scarcity of data, we try to assist clinicians in selecting the appropriate therapy according to the specific characteristics of each patient. Finally, future directions are provided in two key areas of focus: left atrial appendage closure therapies and genetic research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study incorporates the results of subgroup analyses of currently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world cohort studies to compare the effectiveness and safety of new direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes.. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Five retrospective cohort studies and four subgroup analyses of RCTs were included in this meta-analysis.. A meta-analysis of the data of 26,7272 patients showed that for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes, NOACs can significantly reduce the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), ischaemic stroke, and haemorrhagic stroke compared with warfarin, with no significant difference in major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Additionally, NOACs were superior to warfarin in the incidence of intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction, and vascular death.. Among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of SSE versus warfarin, with no significant difference in major bleeding. Therefore, NOACs may be a better clinical choice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This systematic overview was commissioned by England's Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to assess the evidence on direct (previously 'novel') oral anticoagulants (OACs), compared with usual care, in adults, to prevent stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), and to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism (VTE). Specifically, to assess efficacy and safety, genotyping, self-monitoring, and patient and clinician experiences of OACs.. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ASSIA, and CINAHL, in October, 2017, updated in November 2021. We included systematic reviews, published from 2014, in English, assessing OACs, in adults. We rated review quality using AMSTAR2 or the JBI checklist. Two reviewers extracted and synthesised the main findings from the included reviews.. We included 49 systematic reviews; one evaluated efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, 17 assessed genotyping, 23 self-monitoring or adherence, and 15 experiences (seven assessed two topics). Generally, the direct OACs, particularly apixaban (5 mg twice daily), were more effective and safer than warfarin in preventing AF-related stroke. For VTE, there was little evidence of differences in efficacy between direct OACs and low-molecular-weight heparin (prevention), warfarin (treatment), and warfarin or aspirin (secondary prevention). The evidence suggested that some direct OACs may reduce the risk of bleeding, compared with warfarin. One review of genotype-guided warfarin dosing assessed AF patients; no significant differences in stroke prevention were reported. Education about OACs, in patients with AF, could improve adherence. Pharmacist management of coagulation may be better than primary care management. Patients were more adherent to direct OACs than warfarin. Drug efficacy was highly valued by patients and most clinicians, followed by safety. No other factors consistently affected patients' choice of anticoagulant and adherence to treatment. Patients were more satisfied with direct OACs than warfarin.. For stroke prevention in AF, direct OACs seem to be more effective and safer than usual care, and apixaban (5 mg twice daily) had the best profile. For VTE, there was no strong evidence that direct OACs were better than usual care. Education and pharmacist management could improve coagulation control. Both clinicians and patients rated efficacy and safety as the most important factors in managing AF and VTE.. PROSPERO CRD42017084263-one deviation; efficacy and safety were from one review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Genotype; Humans; Review Literature as Topic; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with heightened risks of stroke/systemic embolisation and bleeding. In this review we outline the evidence for AF stroke prevention in kidney disease, identify current knowledge gaps, and give recommendations for anticoagulation at various stages of chronic kidney disease. Overall, anticoagulation is underused. Warfarin use becomes increasingly difficult with advancing kidney disease, with difficulty maintaining international normalised ratio (INR) in therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding compared to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and high rates of discontinuation. Similarly, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is not recommended as it is predominantly renally excreted with consequent increased plasma levels and bleeding risk with advanced kidney disease. The Factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban have less renal excretion (25-35%), modest increases in plasma levels with advancing kidney disease, and are the preferred first line choice for anticoagulation in moderate kidney disease based on strong evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). In severe kidney disease there is a paucity of RCT data, but extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and RCT data for moderate kidney disease, and observational studies, support the considered use of dose-adjusted Factor Xa inhibitors unless the bleeding risk is prohibitive. In Australia, apixaban is approved for creatinine clearance down to 25 mL/min, and rivaroxaban down to 15 mL/min. For end-stage kidney disease warfarin is the only agent approved, but we recommend against anticoagulation (except in selected cases) due to high bleeding risk, multiple co-morbidities, and questionable benefit.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants are crucial for preventing systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with guidelines preferring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general AF population. However, as NOACs are administered in fixed doses, concerns of unintentional underdosing in morbidly obese patients and unintentional overdosing in underweight patients have emerged. Therefore, a critical appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of NOACs in AF patients across the body weight spectrum is needed.. The benefit-risk profile of NOACs seems preserved in (morbidly) obese AF patients and patients with low body weight. However, more data are needed on underweight AF patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Stroke; Thinness; Warfarin

The evidence for use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of post-operative cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation is limited and mostly founded on clinical trials that excluded this patient population. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies to evaluate the hypothesis that DOACs are safe compared to warfarin for the anticoagulation of patients with post-operative cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials and observational studies comparing DOAC with warfarin in patients ≥18 years old who had post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. Primary outcomes included stroke, systemic embolization, bleeding, and mortality. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of all outcomes. The meta-analysis for the primary outcomes showed significantly lower risk of stroke with DOAC use (6 studies, 7143 patients, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50-0.81, I

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Data on the efficacy and safety of the combination of warfarin and dual-antiplatelet therapy compared with warfarin and mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) remains scarce. Single-center study of 130 consecutive patients with durable LVAD. Baseline demographics, antithrombotic and antiplatelet regimen, and outcomes were compared between patients receiving warfarin plus dual-antiplatelet therapy (Group 1) and warfarin plus MAPT (Group 2). Antiplatelet therapy was assessed at hospital discharge post-LVAD implant and included aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole. Outcomes at 1-year were assessed in each group. All patients were on aspirin and warfarin. No significant differences with regards to age, gender or ethnicity were noted at baseline between the two groups. Group 1 was more likely to have higher lactate dehydrogenase LDH levels at discharge and a history of stroke. No significant differences in international normalized ratio INR, hemoglobin or hematocrit were noted at discharge. During the study period, 48 patients had gastrointestinal bleeding events: 28 of 68 (41.2%) in Group 1 vs 20 of 62 (32.2%) in Group 2 (P = 0.293). At 1year, no statistically significant differences were noted in gastrointestinal bleeding (Group 1=27.90% vs Group 2 = 25.80, P = 0.784), ischemic stroke (Group 1 = 8.8% vs group 2 = 6.5%, P = 0.612), hemorrhagic stroke (Group 1 = 4.4% vs group 2 = 3.2%, P = 0.725) or mortality (Group 1 = 5.9% vs Group 2 = 1.6%, P = 0.206). Rates of pump thrombosis however were lower in Group 1 (Group 1 = 0% vs Group 2 = 6.5%, P = 0.033). Our study showed a high prevalence of triple-therapy antithrombotic use in LVAD patients with no significant differences in bleeding, stroke or survival. However, the risk for pump thrombosis was lower at 1-year when compared to patient receiving MAPT.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly preferred over warfarin; however, The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommended avoiding the use of DOACs in morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 or weight >120 kg) because of limited clinical data.. Are DOACs effective and safe in morbidly obese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. We performed a comprehensive search for published studies indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with NVAF.. Information on patient characteristics, comorbidities, primary anticoagulation indications, pharmacologic treatment, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome of interest was stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) rate. The secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB).. A total of 10 studies including, 89,494 morbidly obese patients with NVAF on oral anticoagulation therapy (45,427 on DOACs vs. 44,067 on warfarin) were included in the final analysis. The SSE rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group [odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.81; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%]. MB rate was also significantly lower in DOACs group compared with the warfarin group (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78; P < 0.0001; I2 = 86%). On subgroup analysis, SSE and MB event rates were significantly lower in rivaroxaban and apixaban than warfarin; however, dabigatran showed noninferiority to warfarin in SSE rate but superiority in the safety outcome.. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DOACs are effective and safe with statistical superiority when compared with warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this cohort of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

While anticoagulation and its reversal have been of clinical relevance for decades, recent academic and technological advances have expanded the repertoire of its application in neurological disease. The advent of direct oral anticoagulants provides effective, mechanistically elegant, and relatively safer therapeutic options than warfarin for eligible patients at risk for neurological sequelae of prothrombotic states, particularly given the recent availability of corresponding reversal agents. In this review, we examine the provenance, indications, safety, and reversal tools for anticoagulant medications in the context of neurological disease, with specific attention to acute ischemic stroke, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and intracerebral hemorrhage. We will use specific clinical scenarios to illustrate the complex factors that must be considered in the use of anticoagulation, including intracranial pathology such as intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or malignancy; metabolic complications such as chronic kidney disease; pregnancy; and advanced age.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

An Informatics Consult has been proposed in which clinicians request novel evidence from large scale health data resources, tailored to the treatment of a specific patient. However, the availability of such consultations is lacking. We seek to provide an Informatics Consult for a situation where a treatment indication and contraindication coexist in the same patient, i.e., anti-coagulation use for stroke prevention in a patient with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis.. We examined four sources of evidence for the effect of warfarin on stroke risk or all-cause mortality from: (1) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (2) meta-analysis of prior observational studies, (3) trial emulation (using population electronic health records (N = 3,854,710) and (4) genetic evidence (Mendelian randomisation). We developed prototype forms to request an Informatics Consult and return of results in electronic health record systems.. We found 0 RCT reports and 0 trials recruiting for patients with AF and cirrhosis. We found broad concordance across the three new sources of evidence we generated. Meta-analysis of prior observational studies showed that warfarin use was associated with lower stroke risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, CI 0.39-1.29). In a target trial emulation, warfarin was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.61, CI 0.49-0.76) and ischaemic stroke (HR = 0.27, CI 0.08-0.91). Mendelian randomisation served as a drug target validation where we found that lower levels of vitamin K1 (warfarin is a vitamin K1 antagonist) are associated with lower stroke risk. A pilot survey with an independent sample of 34 clinicians revealed that 85% of clinicians found information on prognosis useful and that 79% thought that they should have access to the Informatics Consult as a service within their healthcare systems. We identified candidate steps for automation to scale evidence generation and to accelerate the return of results.. We performed a proof-of-concept Informatics Consult for evidence generation, which may inform treatment decisions in situations where there is dearth of randomised trials. Patients are surprised to know that their clinicians are currently not able to learn in clinic from data on 'patients like me'. We identify the key challenges in offering such an Informatics Consult as a service.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Informatics; Referral and Consultation; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of developing a stroke by 20%. AF related strokes are associated with greater morbidity. Historically, warfarin was the anticoagulant of choice for stroke prevention in patients with AF but lately patients are being switched or started on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are promoted as safer alternatives to warfarin and it is expected that they will be associated with fewer challenges both for patients and healthcare professionals. This systematic narrative review aimed to explore perspectives of patients and professionals on medicines optimisation of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and DOACs in atrial fibrillation.. Prospero registration CRD42018091591. Systematic searches undertaken of research studies (qualitative and quantitative), published February 2018 to November 2020 from several databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Medline Via Ovid, CINHAL via Ebsco, and PubMED via NCBI) following PRISMA methodology. Data were organised using Covidence software. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and synthesized the findings (thematic analysis approach).. Thirty-four studies were included. Studies were critically appraised using established critical appraisal tools (Qualsyst) and a risk of bias was assigned. Clinicians considered old age and the associated complexities such as co-morbidities and the increased potential for bleeding as potential barriers to optimising anticoagulation. Whereas patients' health and medication beliefs influenced adherence. Notably, structured patient support was important in enhancing safety and effective anticoagulation. For both patients and clinicians, confidence and experience of safe anticoagulation was influenced by the presence of co-morbidities,  poor knowledge and understanding of AF and the purpose of anticoagulation.. Age, complex multimorbidity and polypharmacy influence prescribing, with DOACs being perceived to be safer than warfarin. This systematic narrative review suggests that interventions are needed to support patient self-management. There are residual anxieties associated with long term anticoagulation in the context of complexities.. Not applicable.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulant therapy increases the risk that cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) progress to intracerebral hemorrhage, but whether the therapy increases risk of CMB occurrence is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the potential association between anticoagulant use and CMB occurrence in stroke and stroke-free individuals.. We searched observational studies in PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from their inception until September 2019. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the prevalence and incidence of CMBs in anticoagulant users relative to non-anticoagulant users.. Forty-seven studies with 25,245 participants were included. The pooled analysis showed that anticoagulant use was associated with CMB prevalence (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.88). The association was observed in subgroups stratified by type of participants: stroke-free, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.25-2.77; ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.67; and intracerebral hemorrhage, OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.06-4.83. Anticoagulant use was associated with increased prevalence of strictly lobar CMBs (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.32) but not deep/infratentorial CMBs. Warfarin was associated with increased CMB prevalence (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.23-2.18), but novel oral anticoagulants were not. Anticoagulant users showed higher incidence of CMBs during long-term follow-up (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22-2.44).. Anticoagulant use is associated with higher prevalence and incidence of CMBs. This association appears to depend on location of CMBs and type of anticoagulants. More longitudinal investigations with adjustment for confounders are required to establish the causality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Several studies have investigated the efficacy and safety outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). Herein, this meta-analysis was aimed to compare the effect of NOACs with warfarin in this population. We systematically searched the PubMed database until December 2019 for studies that compared the effect of NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF and HF. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted and then pooled using a random-effects model. A total of nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of NOACs was significantly associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.92)), all-cause death (RR = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94)), major bleeding (RR = 0.84; (95% CI, 0.74-0.97)), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.43-0.59), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.63)). There were no differences in the risks of ischemic stroke (RR = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.75-1.04)) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.11 (95% CI, 0.79-1.55)) in patients treated with NOACs versus warfarin. Compared with warfarin use, the use of NOACs had similar or lower risks of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with AF and HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus.. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 15 October 2019. Studies on efficacy and safety outcomes of rivaroxaban and warfarin were included. Efficacy and safety outcomes, including stroke, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and major gastrointestinal bleeding were collected for meta-analysis.. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban could significantly reduce stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.95; P = 0.01), ischemic stroke (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.87; P = 0.0004), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.89; P = 0.002), myocardial infarction (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.82; P < 0.0001), and major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.94; P = 0.02) in patients with AF and diabetes. Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.65-0.96; P = 0.02), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.69; P < 0.00001), and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P = 0.04). Similar results were obtained in stratified meta-analysis of cohort studies.. Our study suggests a favorable risk-benefit profile of rivaroxaban, with superior efficacy and safety over warfarin in patients with AF and diabetes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective and safe as warfarin for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Limited evidence is available regarding outcomes for NVAF patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias. All primary publications and secondary analyses comparing NOACs with other oral anticoagulation regimens for the prevention of stroke in patients with both NVAF and PAD from phase III clinical trials were evaluated. The primary outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and the secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction (MI).. Three articles were included in this study. The pooled results showed a relative risk for stroke/SE with NOACs of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-1.39), for major bleeding, 1.12 (95% CI: 0.70-1.81), for ICH, 0.47 (95% CI: 0.16-1.36), for CV mortality, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.57-1.04), for all-cause mortality, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.70-1.19), and for MI, 1.10 (95% CI: 0.64-1.90).. The findings show that NOACs are effective and safe for preventing stroke/SE in patients with both NVAF and PAD.. HINTERGRUND: Neue orale Antikoagulanzien (NOAK) sind ebenso wirksam und sicher wie Warfarin für Patienten mit nichtvalvulärem Vorhofflimmern (NVAF). Hinsichtlich der Ergebnisse für NVAF-Patienten mit peripherer arterieller Verschlusskrankheit (pAVK) besteht jedoch nur begrenzt Evidenz.. In den Datenbanken Medline, Embase und der Cochrane Library wurde eine systematische Suche durchgeführt. Unabhängig extrahierten 2 Untersucher die Daten und beurteilten die Qualität anhand des Instruments der Cochrane Collaboration zur Beurteilung des Risikos für Bias. Ausgewertet wurden alle Primärpublikationen und Sekundäranalysen, in denen NOAK mit anderen Schemata unter Einsatz oraler Antikoagulanzien zur Schlaganfallprävention bei Patienten, die sowohl NVAF als auch pAVK aufwiesen, in klinischen Phase-III-Studien verglichen wurden. Die primären Endpunkte waren Schlaganfall, systemische Embolien (SE), schwere Blutungen und intrakranielle Hämorrhagien (ICH); die sekundären Endpunkte waren kardiovaskulär bedingte (CV-)Mortalität, Mortalität aus sämtlichen Ursachen und Myokardinfarkt (MI) ERGEBNISSE: In die vorliegende Studie wurden 3 Artikel einbezogen. Die gepoolten Ergebnisse zeigten ein relatives Risiko für Schlaganfall/SE unter NOAK von 0,86 (95%-Konfidenzintervall, 95%-KI: 0,53–1,39), für schwere Blutungen lag es bei 1,12 (95%-KI: 0,70–1,81), für ICH bei 0,47 (95%-KI: 0,16–1,36), für CV-Mortalität bei 0,77 (95%-KI: 0,57–1,04), für Mortalität aus sämtlichen Ursachen bei 0,91 (95%-KI: 0,70–1,19) und für MI bei 1,10 (95%-KI: 0,64–1,90).. Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse zeigen, dass NOAK zur Prävention von Schlaganfall/SE bei Patienten mit NVAF und gleichzeitiger pAVK wirksam und sicher sind.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin among Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing dialysis remains unclear.. We first compared the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and major bleeding associated with DOACs compared with warfarin, in NVAF Asians undergoing dialysis using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) (Aim 1). Next, we searched PubMed and Medline from January 1, 2010 until January 31, 2020, to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational real-world studies comparing DOACs with warfarin specifically focused on NVAF patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis (Aim 2). Finally, we tested the hypothesis whether AF patients undergoing dialysis treated with OACs (warfarin and DOACs) would be associated with lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes as compared to those without OACs using the Taiwan NHIRD (Aim 3).. From June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, a total of 3237 and 9263 NVAF patients comorbid with ESRD receiving oral anticoagulant (OACs) (490 on DOAC, 2747 on warfarin) or no OACs, respectively, were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates across the study groups. For the comparison of DOAC vs. warfarin (Aim 1), DOACs had comparable risks of IS/SE and major bleeding to warfarin in our present cohort. From the original 85 results retrieved, nine studies (including our study) with a total of 6490 and 22,494 patients treated with DOACs and warfarin were included in the meta-analysis, respectively. There were 5343 (82%) and 20,337 (90%) patients treated with DOACs and warfarin undergoing dialysis, respectively. The pooled meta-analysis also indicated no difference of the effectiveness (HR:0.90; [95%CI:0.74-1.10]; P = 0.32) and safety outcomes (HR:0.75; [95%CI:0.54-1.05]; P = 0.09) between DOACs and warfarin (Aim 2). For the comparison of OAC (+) vs. OAC (-) (Aim 3), OAC-treatment was associated with a higher risk of IS/SE (hazard ratio (HR):1.54; [95% confidential interval (CI):1.29-1.84];P < 0.0001) and comparable risk of major bleeding compared to those without OAC treatment.. DOACs did not provide benefit over warfarin regarding effectiveness and safety in AF patients undergoing dialysis. The use of OAC was not associated with a lower risk of IS/SE in ESRD AF patients when compared to those without OAC use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Patient Acuity; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Taiwan; Warfarin

There are conflicting signals in the literature about comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. We conducted multicentre matched cohort studies with secondary meta-analysis to assess safety and effectiveness of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban across 9 administrative healthcare databases. We included adults with NVAF initiating anticoagulation therapy (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban), and constructed 3 cohorts to compare DOACs pairwise. The primary outcome was pooled hazard ratio (pHR) of ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included pHR of major bleeding, and a composite of stroke, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality. We used proportional hazard Cox regressions models, and pooled estimates were obtained with random effect meta-analyses.. The cohorts included 73 414 new users of dabigatran, 92 881 of rivaroxaban, and 61 284 of apixaban. After matching, the pHRs (95% confidence intervals) comparing rivaroxaban initiation to dabigatran were: 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 1.26 (1.09, 1.46) for major bleeding, and 1.17 (1.05, 1.30) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs dabigatran, they were: 0.91 (0.74, 1.12) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) for major bleeding, and 0.94 (0.78 to 1.14) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs rivaroxaban, they were: 0.85 (0.74, 0.99) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.61 (0.53, 0.70) for major bleeding, and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88) for the composite endpoint.. We found that apixaban use is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, and similar risks compared with dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia. It is of a high disability and death rate, and seriously affects quality of life. Although New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended for anticoagulation therapy of atrial fibrillation, they are not widely used for the high cost and limited availability. Warfarin is effective and economical. The risk of thromboembolism and anticoagulant hemorrhage is higher in patients >65 years with NVAF. So, it is of great clinical significance to explore the optimal anticoagulation intensity of warfarin in patients >65 years of China, and other ethnicities. Some studies suggested that low-intensity international normalized ratio (INR) has similar antithrombotic efficacy comparing to standard-intensity INR, whereas bleeding risk was significantly reduced. But others showed conflicting results. We pooled the efficacy and safety data of low- and standard-intensity warfarin therapy for patients over 65 years with NVAF by meta-analysis, as to evaluate optimal INR intensity of warfarin therapy in patients over 65 years. We identified 18 studies providing data of 2105 patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. On meta-analysis (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]), low-intensity INR conferred similar efficacy to standard intensity INR on all thrombosis (1.28 [0.90 to 1.81]), stroke (1.09 [0.67 to 1.77]), other thromboembolism ([peripheral and pulmonary embolism] 2.26 [0.89 to 5.79]), and all cause death (1.38 [0.94 to 2.02]). Low-intensity INR conferred better safety profile than standard intensity INR in major bleeding (intracranial and gastrointestinal hemorrhage) (0.32 [0.19 to 0.52]), minor bleeding (gum, nasal cavity and conjunctival hemorrhage, skin ecchymosis, hematuria, hemoptysis) (0.30 [0.20 to 0.45]), and all bleeding (0.30 [0.22 to 0.40]). In conclusion, low-intensity INR (1.5 to 2.0) of warfarin therapy is as effective as standard intensity INR (2.0 to 3.0) therapy in reducing thromboembolic risk in patients>65 years with NVAF, and has a safer profile of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Patient Care Planning; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed instead of warfarin for chronic anticoagulation for ease of dosing, fewer interactions, and less stringent monitoring. However, it is important to consider indications and comorbidities for which warfarin is still the preferred anticoagulant. This review aims to capture these clinical scenarios in which warfarin may still be preferred over DOACs.. We undertook a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed database. Key search terms were based on DOAC clinical trial exclusion criteria, as well as indications and conditions in which the use of DOACs for anticoagulation has suggested harm. Society guidelines and tertiary literature were used to inform expert opinion where necessary. Studies were included if they investigated the use of DOACs or warfarin in the identified indications or conditions.. Currently, evidence for the use of warfarin over DOACs for anticoagulation is strongest for patients with prosthetic valves, antiphospholipid syndrome, or a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. For several clinical situations, including mitral stenosis, obesity, altered gastrointestinal anatomy, pulmonary arterial hypertension, renal or hepatic impairment, and left ventricular thrombus, evidence is lacking but may eventually support the use of DOACs. Depending on indication and condition, appropriateness of DOAC use may vary by agent.. New evidence continues to support new indications and conditions in which DOACs may be appropriate to use for anticoagulation. There are key clinical scenarios, however, in which emerging literature continues to support warfarin as the preferred anticoagulant.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Comorbidity; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Liver Failure; Medication Adherence; Mitral Valve Stenosis; Overweight; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Renal Insufficiency; Stroke; Warfarin

With the aim of recommending proper anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus, we performed the network meta-analysis comparing the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in terms of efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding) outcome.. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed with the items "dabigatran, edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, AF and diabetes mellitus". On the basis of R (version 3.5.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and JAGS (version 4.3.0) to perform the network meta-analysis, our work was also conducted with the help of NetMetaXL (version1.6.1) and winBUGS (version1.4.3) to obtain the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of treatments.. With respect to the most effective drug for preventing systemic embolism or stroke, there was a high probability that dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.88) would ranked first, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.63), dabigatran110 (SUCRA 0.59) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA 0.51). In comparison, probability of ranking the safest drug for preventing major bleeding was edoxaban (SUCRA 0.94), followed by dabigatran110 (SUCRA 0.59) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA 0.52).. In patients suffering from AF and diabetes, dabigatran 110 mg (bid) was more likely to become the choice for its performance on preventing systemic embolism or stroke and major bleeding, followed by rivaroxaban 20 mg (QD).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Stroke; Warfarin

The relative risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is debatable. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with each other are lacking. We performed network meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of major GIB differs based on type and dose of DOAC. Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2019, limited to English publications, was conducted to identify RCTs comparing DOACs with warfarin or enoxaparin for any indication. Primary outcome of interest was major GIB risk. We used frequentist network meta-analysis through the random-effects model to compare DOACs with each other and DOACs by dose to isolate the impact on major GIB. Twenty-eight RCTs, including 139 587 patients receiving six anticoagulants, were selected. The risk of major GIB for DOACs was equal to warfarin. Comparison of DOACs with each other did not show risk differences. After accounting for dose, rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 300 mg and edoxaban 60 mg daily had 47, 40 and 22% higher rates of major GIB versus warfarin, respectively. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily had lower major GIB compared to dabigatran 300 mg (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88) and rivaroxaban 20 mg (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83) daily. Heterogeneity was low, and the model was consistent without publication bias (Egger's test: P = 0.079). All RCTs were high-quality with low risk of bias. DOACs at standard dose, except apixaban, had a higher risk of major GIB compared to warfarin. Apixaban had a lower rate of major GIB compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on dialysis remains a matter of debate. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases was performed for eligible studies that comparing the effect and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted, and then pooled using a random-effects model.. A total of seven studies, one post hoc analysis of RCT and six observational cohorts, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95). There were no significant differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.43-1.19; apixaban, HR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.09) and major bleeding (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.64-1.45; apixaban, HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.28-1.12).. Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban or apixaban are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Warfarin reduces the incidence and mortality of strokes in patients with AF. Edoxaban reduces the bleeding risk in patients with AF. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in preventing clinical events in patients with AF through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs were retrieved from medical literature databases. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the primary and safety endpoints. In total, five articles (10 trial comparisons) containing 24,836 patients were retrieved. Of these patients, 16,268 (65.5%) received edoxaban and 8,568 (34.5%) received warfarin. Compared with warfarin, edoxaban significantly reduced the incidence of cardiovascular death (CVD), major bleeding, and non-major bleeding (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.93, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.59-0.71, I2 : 75.6%; and RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84, I2 : 79.3%, respectively). Edoxaban did not increase the incidence of stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction, and adverse events compared with warfarin (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.90-1.11, I2 : 42.8%; RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.67-1.49, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.27, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10, I2: 46.4%, respectively). This meta-analysis indicated that compared with warfarin, edoxaban can significantly reduce the incidence of CVD and major and non-major bleeding. The anticoagulant effect and safety of edoxaban may be better than those of warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin has existed for >7 decades and has been the anticoagulant of choice for many thromboembolic disorders. The recent introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has, however, caused a shift in preference by healthcare professionals all over the world. DOACs have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and in treatment of venous thromboembolism. In sub-Saharan Africa, however, the widespread use of DOACs has been hampered mainly by their higher acquisition costs. As the drugs come off patent, their use in sub-Saharan Africa is likely to increase. However, very few trials have been conducted in African settings, and safety concerns will need to be addressed with further study before widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Africa South of the Sahara; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

The purpose of this review is to examine the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and provide recommendations for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation in obese patients, elderly patients, and patients with chronic kidney disease.. Multiple retrospective cohort studies have shown no difference in bleeding, stroke, or venous thromboembolism outcomes between DOACs and warfarin in patients who are obese, elderly, or those with chronic kidney disease or on dialysis. Some studies have shown that DOACs have a lower bleeding risk than warfarin in these populations. DOACs may be a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who are obese, elderly, or those with chronic kidney disease or on dialysis. Apixaban may improve clinical outcomes by lowering the risk of bleeding versus warfarin. DOACs may also be an effective and safe alternative to warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in obese patients; however, additional studies are needed to assess their use in elderly patients and those with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or dialysis patients are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin in patients with CKD requiring anticoagulation therapy.. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies, with the inclusion criteria being a comparative study between DOACs and warfarin in patients with CKD or dialysis patients from database inception until August 2020. The efficacy outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the safety outcome was major bleeding.. Compared with warfarin, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE/VTE by 22% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.95) and major bleeding by 17% (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97). On comparing factor Xa inhibitors and dabigatran with warfarin separately, factor Xa inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE/VTE (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98) and major bleeding (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91) overall in patients. Comparing each DOACs with warfarin separately, apixaban was associated with a significantly better risk reduction of stroke/SE/VTE (25% risk reduction) and major bleeding (35% risk reduction) than warfarin. Compared with warfarin, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke, SE, or VTE by 19% (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97) in patients with CKD stage 3 and significantly lowered the risk of major bleeding by 31% (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85) in patients with CKD stages 4-5.. In pooled, analyzed randomized controlled trials and observational studies, DOACs were associated with better efficacy in early CKD, as well as similar efficacy and safety outcomes to warfarin in patients with CKD stages 4-5 or dialysis patients. The results of patients with CKD stages 4-5 and dialysis patients were from observational studies. Well-designed randomized controlled trials focused on DOAC use in patients with CKD and dialysis patients are needed. PROSPERO register number: CRD42020150599, 6 February, 2020.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is an issue with safety, especially in clinically relevant bleeding. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with NOACs.. Interventions were warfarin, enoxaparin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the following indications: AF, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and postsurgical prophylaxis.. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 large observation population studies were included. Compared with warfarin, apixaban showed a decreased the risk of major GI bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.76), and rivaroxaban tended to increase this risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85). Dabigatran (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.60), edoxaban (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.65), and enoxaparin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.63-2.43) did not significantly increase the risk of GI bleeding than did warfarin. In the subgroup analysis, according to indications, apixaban showed a decreased risk of major GI bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) than did warfarin in AF studies. Dabigatran (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60, and rivaroxaban (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-6.41) increased the risk of major GI bleeding than did apixaban. An analysis of studies on venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism showed that no individual NOAC or enoxaparin was associated with an increased risk of major GI bleeding compared to warfarin.. Individual NOACs had varying profiles of GI bleeding risk. Results of analyses including only RCTs and those including both RCTs and population studies showed similar trends, but also showed several differences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Background Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have better pharmacologic properties than warfarin and are recommended in preference to warfarin in most patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Besides lower bleeding complications, other advantages of NOACs over warfarin particularly renal outcomes remain inconclusive. Methods and Results Electronic searches were conducted through Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, and ClinicalTrial.gov. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies reporting incidence rates and hazard ratio (HR) of renal outcomes (including acute kidney injury, worsening renal function, doubling serum creatinine, and end-stage renal disease) were selected. The random-effects model was used to calculate pooled incidence and HR with 95% CI. Eighteen studies were included. A total of 285 201 patients were enrolled, 118 863 patients with warfarin and 166 338 patients with NOACs. The NOACs group yielded lower incidence rates of all renal outcomes when compared with the warfarin group. Patients treated with NOACs showed significantly lower HR of risk of acute kidney injury (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.64-0.76;

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Creatinine; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Stroke; Warfarin

Background Evidence on the differences in fracture risk associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and warfarin is inconsistent and inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the fracture risk associated with NOACs and warfarin. Methods and Results We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until May 19, 2020. We included studies presenting measurements (regardless of primary/secondary/tertiary/safety outcomes) for any fracture in both NOAC and warfarin users. Two or more reviewers independently screened relevant articles, extracted data, and performed quality assessments. Data were retrieved to synthesize the pooled relative risk (RR) of fractures associated with NOACs versus warfarin. Random-effects models were used for data synthesis. We included 29 studies (5 cohort studies and 24 randomized controlled trials) with 388 209 patients. Patients treated with NOACs had lower risks of fracture than those treated with warfarin (pooled RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.91;

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fractures, Bone; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Stroke; Warfarin

Anemia has been associated with a higher risk of major bleeding among atrial fibrillation patients on oral anticoagulation and is therefore included in most bleeding risk scores. In contrast, much less evidence exists regarding the association between anemia and stroke risk in atrial fibrillation patients. The purpose of this review was to re-evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment, in particular of new oral anticoagulants, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and chronic anemia. Five observational studies were found in the literature that specifically investigated this issue; the results can be synthetized as follows: (i) the progressive decrease in hemoglobin level was associated with an increased incidence of major hemorrhages, already evident in mild anemia and very high in more severe anemia (hemoglobin level <~10 g/dl), up to >10% per year. In contrast, the association between anemia and stroke risk appears to be weak; (ii) warfarin seems to be effective in stroke prevention in patients with mild anemia, with a moderate increase in major hemorrhages, whereas it seems to be ineffective and associated with a high incidence of hemorrhagic complications in patients with more severe anemia; (iii) new oral anticoagulants, in particular apixaban, seem to induce a lower incidence of major hemorrhages in comparison with warfarin in patients with both mild and severe anemia. However, when hemoglobin level is <~10 g/dl, the incidence of major hemorrhages remains high, also in patients treated with the new anticoagulants. These data suggest that in patients with atrial fibrillation and mild anemia, anticoagulant treatment appears to be effective, but requires close monitoring during follow-up, whereas in patients with more severe anemia the choice of whether or not to prescribe an anticoagulant treatment should be made on a case by case basis, considering the thromboembolic risk, the etiology of chronic anemia and the history and general condition of the patient. New oral anticoagulants should be preferred to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Data on the efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer are limited. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between NOACs and warfarin in this population.. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published through July 2020 was performed. An evaluation of each study was conducted, and data were extracted. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% CIs were calculated.. Eight studies (3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 retrospective cohort studies) involving a total of 24,665 patients were included. Among the RCTs, there were no significant differences in the rates of stroke or systemic embolism (OR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.06; P=0.09), venous thromboembolism (OR=0.91; 95% CI, 0.33-2.52; P=0.86), myocardial infarction (OR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.23; P=0.24), major bleeding (OR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.06; P=0.12), or major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (OR= 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19; P=0.86) between the NOAC and warfarin groups. Among the observational studies, patients who used NOACs had a significantly lower risk than those who used warfarin. The prevalence rates of ischemic stroke (OR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92; P=0.02), VTE (OR=0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.60; P<0.00001), major bleeding (OR=0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.55; P=0.0002), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (OR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.92; P=0.02) were significantly reduced in the NOAC group.. Our meta-analysis confirms that NOACs are as safe and effective as warfarin and can be applied in the real world; this data can serve as a reference for clinical doctors for formulating treatment strategies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

People with chronic heart failure (HF) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripheral arterial embolism; coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of HF. The use of long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain populations, including people with HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader HF population.. To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and stroke in people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.. We updated the searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2020. We screened reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings to identify unpublished studies. We contacted relevant authors to obtain further data. We did not apply any language restrictions.. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment in adults with HF, with treatment duration of at least one month. We made inclusion decisions in duplicate, and resolved any disagreements between review authors by discussion, or a third party.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy by calculating odds ratio (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We identified three RCTs (5498 participants). One RCT compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic therapy, the second compared warfarin with placebo in participants with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the third compared rivaroxaban with placebo in participants with HF and coronary artery disease. We pooled data from the studies that compared warfarin with a placebo or no treatment. We are uncertain if there is an effect on all-cause death (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.18; 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence); warfarin may increase the risk of major bleeding events (OR 5.98, 95% CI 1.71 to 20.93, NNTH 17). 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported stroke as an individual outcome. Rivaroxaban makes little to no difference to all-cause death compared with placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.13; 1 study, 5022 participants; high-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban probably reduces the risk of stroke compared to placebo (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; NNTB 101; 1 study, 5022 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.33; NNTH 79; 1 study, 5008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).. Based on the three RCTs, there is no evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality in people with HF in sinus rhythm. The evidence is uncertain if warfarin has any effect on all-cause death compared to placebo or no treatment, but it may increase the risk of major bleeding events. There is no evidence of a difference in the effect of rivaroxaban on all-cause death compared to placebo. It probably reduces the risk of stroke, but probably increases the risk of major bleedings. The available evidence does not support the routine use of anticoagulation in people with HF who remain in sinus rhythm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Time Factors; Turkey; Warfarin

Many concerns were raised about the outcome of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease. However, the reported relationship between their efficacy and safety was variable. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship.. A systematic literature search up to July 2020 was performed and six studies included 50 074 subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease at the baseline with 32 229 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant consumers and 18 920 warfarin consumers. They were reporting relationships between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to evaluate the prognostic role of the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease subjects using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model.. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants consumption was significantly related to lower all-cause mortality in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99, P = .03); lower intracranial haemorrhage (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55- 0.82, P < .001) and low stroke and system embolism (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86, P < .001) compared with warfarin consumption. However, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants consumption was not significantly related to lower major bleeding in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.02, P = .06); and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.49, P = .77) compared with warfarin consumption.. Based on this meta-analysis, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant consumption may have an independent lower risk relationship with all-cause mortality, intracranial haemorrhage, and stroke and system embolism compared with warfarin consumption in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease. This relationship forces us to recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use in subjects with atrial fibrillation and liver disease for better outcomes and to avoid any possible complications. Further studies are required.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Diseases; Stroke; Warfarin

To assess the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after the use of rivaroxaban or warfarin. To investigate the effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline from the establishment of databases up to 2020. We finally included 38 observational studies involving 1 312 609 patients for the assessment of intracranial hemorrhage, and 33 observational studies involving 1 332 956 patients for the assessment of gastrointestinal bleeding. The rates of intracranial hemorrhage were 0.55% in the rivaroxaban group versus 0.91% in the warfarin group (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.53-0.66; p < .00001, I2 = 78%). The rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were 2.63% in patients with rivaroxaban versus 2.48% in those with warfarin (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.96-1.17; p < .00001, I2 = 94%). Rivaroxaban could significantly reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF than warfarin, but the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding remained controversy due to no statistical significant difference. Notably, a subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients in rivaroxaban group with severe chronic renal diseases or undergoing hemodialysis exposed to less gastrointestinal hemorrhage risk than the group from warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of 4 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-world practice through a network meta-analysis of observational studies.. We searched multiple comprehensive databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) for studies published until August 2020. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for the pooled estimates. Efficacy outcomes included ischemic stroke (IS), stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality, and safety outcomes included major bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The P score was calculated for ranking probabilities. Subgroup analyses were separately performed in accordance with the dosage range of NOACs ("standard-" and "low-dose").. A total of 11, 6, and 8 studies were allocated to the total population, standard-dose group, and low-dose group, respectively. In the total study population, edoxaban ranked the best in terms of IS and ICH prevention and apixaban ranked the best for SSE, major bleeding, and GI bleeding. In the standard-dose regimen, apixaban ranked the best in terms of IS and SSE prevention. For major bleeding, GI bleeding, and ICH, edoxaban ranked the best. In the low-dose regimen, edoxaban ranked the best for IS, SSE, GI bleeding, and ICH prevention. For major bleeding prevention, apixaban ranked best.. All 4 NOACs had different efficacy and safety outcomes according to their type and dosage. Apixaban and edoxaban might be relatively better and more well-balanced treatment for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Stroke; Warfarin

Bariatric surgery has emerged as a therapy for obesity and the associated comorbidities. Obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for atrial fibrillation as well as venous thromboembolism, both of which are conditions that warrant anticoagulation. There is significant underrepresentation of the morbidly obese population in prospective trials that evaluated direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We aim to review all the available data that assessed these oral anticoagulants in the morbidly obese population (body mass index >40 kg/m

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bariatric Surgery; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been implicated with efficacy and safety concerns. Evidence on the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population is limited.. Electronic databases were searched and articles comparing the safety and efficacy of warfarin with apixaban or rivaroxaban were identified. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were computed using a random-effects model.. A total of eight articles consisting of 30,806 patients; (rivaroxaban 2196, apixaban 2745 and warfarin 25,865) were identified. The pooled HR for major bleeding events favored apixaban over warfarin (0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.84, p = 0.008). Apixaban was similar to warfarin in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.64-1.84, p = 0.77) and stroke events (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85, 1.39, p = 0.99). There was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding events (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.50-1.81, p = 0.88) and stroke between rivaroxaban (HR 1.39, 95% CI, 0.59-3.29, p = 0.09) and warfarin. The combined results of major bleeding in the apixaban group were not affected by the sensitivity analysis.. Apixaban may have a lower risk of major bleeding and comparable risk of stroke when compared with warfarin in AF patients with ESRD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver disease remains largely unresolved. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs with warfarin in this population.. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies reporting the comparisons of NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF and liver disease. A random-effects model was selected to pool the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. A total of six studies with 41,954 participants were included in this meta-analysis. In AF patients with liver disease, compared with warfarin use, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93), major bleeding (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.41-0.59), but had comparable risks of stroke or system embolism (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.12) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61-1.34). In AF patients with cirrhosis, NOACs significantly reduced the risks of major bleeding (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97) compared with warfarin.. Based on current publications, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to warfarin in patients with AF and liver disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Diseases; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Perioperative physicians should be well versed in atrial fibrillation (AF) management because it is the most common sustained arrythmia in the United States. In this narrative review of the 2019 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiologists/Heart Rhythm Society Focused Update on Atrial Fibrillation, the authors detail the emergence of new evidence from completed studies that may affect the management of patients with AF presenting for surgery. Updates regarding non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) comprise the bulk of the update with newer evidence emerging regarding their equivalence and/or superiority compared to Coumadin. Apixaban is now the preferred drug of choice for first line stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF over Coumadin. Renal dysfunction and the management of patients with AF on hemodialysis is examined; in patients on hemodialysis with AF, the focused update recommends administration of either warfarin or dose-reduced apixaban. Evidence from new trials addressing the appropriate bridging of NOACs before surgery is discussed. Patients with nonvalvular AF may not exhibit an added benefit from bridging of anticoagulation, and perioperative physicians should balance the risks of stroke and major bleeding before surgery. Advances in nonpharmacologic treatment and management of AF are outlined, including left atrial appendage occlusion devices, catheter ablations, and electrical cardioversion. Anesthesiologists' understanding of these 2019 updated guidelines will allow for more adept optimization of patients with AF presenting for surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anesthesiologists; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin care bundles (e.g. genotyping, patient self-testing or self-management) are alternatives to usual warfarin care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NOACs and warfarin care bundles in patients with AF in a middle-income country, Thailand.. A Markov model was used to evaluate the economic and treatment outcomes of warfarin care bundles and NOACs compared with usual warfarin care. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon with 3% discount rate in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old atrial fibrillation patients. Input parameters were derived from published literature, meta-analysis and local data when available. The outcome measure was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained (ICER).. Using USD5104 as the threshold of willingness-to-pay per QALY, patient's self-management of warfarin was cost-effective when compared to usual warfarin care, with an ICER of USD1395/QALY from societal perspective. All NOACs were not cost-effective in Thailand, with ICER ranging from USD8678 to USD14,247/QALY. When compared to the next most effective intervention, patient's self-testing and genotype-guided warfarin dosing were dominated. In the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, patient's self-management had the highest probability of being cost-effective in Thailand, approximately 78%. Results were robust over a range of inputs in sensitivity analyses.. In Thailand, NOACs were unlikely to be cost-effective at current prices. Conversely, patient's self-management is a highly cost-effective intervention and may be considered for adoption in developing regions with resource-limited healthcare systems.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Markov Chains; Patient Care Bundles; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Thailand; Warfarin

In addition to lowering stroke risk, warfarin use is also associated with reduced stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke. It was sought to determine whether the effect of non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), compared to warfarin, differed by stroke severity.. Phase III randomized controlled trials with participants who were randomized to receive NOACs or warfarin for stroke prevention in the setting of non-valvular atrial fibrillation were identified. Stroke was classified into two categories, fatal or disabling stroke and non-disabling stroke, and meta-analyses were completed for both outcomes and for comparative case fatality of stroke amongst trials.. Five randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. In clinical trials evaluating the NOACs usually prescribed in clinical practice (four trials), acute stroke was reported in 1403 (1.86%) participants, 787 (1.04%) in the NOAC group [386 (0.51%) fatal or disabling, 401 (0.53%) non-disabling] and 616 (0.82%) in the warfarin group [367 (0.49%) fatal or disabling, 249 (0.33%) non-disabling]. On meta-analysis NOACs were significantly superior to warfarin for fatal or disabling stroke (odds ratio [OR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.89, I. In phase III trials of NOACs, for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation, NOACs are associated with a lower risk of both fatal/disabling and non-disabling stroke compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Warfarin

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with a long-term indication for anticoagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare randomised trials' outcomes of these patients, focussing on dual versus triple antithrombotic and non vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K oral anticoagulants regimens.. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2019 yielding 309 articles, and after careful screening, five randomized trials totalling 10 643 patients were included for analysis.. Dual antithrombotic regimens were associated with significantly less thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71], with no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.19). NOAC regimens had significantly lower TIMI major and minor bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.16) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26).. Dual antithrombotic and NOAC regimens have reduced bleeding without compromising the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality, and should be preferred for patients with ACS or PCI also needing long-term anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- There are scarce data regarding the safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke among patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Methods- We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature. Data regarding all adult patients pretreated with DOAC who received IVT for acute ischemic stroke were recorded. Meta-analysis was performed by comparing the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in these patients with (1) stroke patients without prior anticoagulation therapy and (2) patients on warfarin with international normalized ratio <1.7. Meta-analyses were further conducted in subgroups as follows: (1) administration of DOAC within 48 hours versus an unknown interval before IVT, (2) consideration of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage outcome according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders (NINDS) versus the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS-II) criteria. Results- After reviewing 13 392 reports and communicating with certain authors of 12 published studies, a total of 52 823 acute ischemic stroke patients from 6 studies were enrolled in the present meta-analysis: DOACs: 366, warfarin: 2133, and 503 241 patients without prior anticoagulation. We detected no additional risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following IVT among patients taking DOACs within 48 hours-DOACs-warfarin: NINDS (odds ratio [OR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.19-1.59]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.28-2.16]); DOACs-no-anticoagulation: NINDS (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.46-3.31]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.32-2.41]). Similarly, no additional risk was detected with no time limit between last DOAC intake-DOACs warfarin: NINDS (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.49-1.45]), ECASS-II (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.67-1.85]); DOACs-no-anticoagulation: NINDS (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.43-3.15]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.33-2.41]). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across included studies (

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

 Western guidelines recommend an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2 to 3 when using warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but lower INR ranges are frequently used in East Asia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in AF patients comparing the effect of lower versus standard INR targets on thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality..  We searched Western databases including Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase as well as Chinese databases including SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random-effects model. We grouped INR targets in two ways: (1) any study-specific lower versus standard targets and (2) INR ranges of approximately 1.5 to 2 versus 2 to 3..  Seventy-nine RCTs (.  Moderate quality evidence suggests lower INR targets reduce bleeding but increase thromboembolism in AF. The data are dominated by East-Asian studies, limiting generalizability to Western populations. Until higher quality data demonstrate otherwise, an INR range of 2 to 3 should remain standard for thromboembolic prophylaxis in AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiology; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reference Standards; Risk; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin care bundles (e.g. genotype-guided warfarin dosing, patient's self-testing [PST] or patient's self-management [PSM] and left atrial appendage closure) are based on the concept of combining several interventions to improve anticoagulation care. NOACs are also introduced for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, these interventions have not been compared in head-to-head trials yet. We did a network meta-analysis based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant interventions for SPAF. Studies comparing these interventions in adults, whether administered alone or as care bundles were included in the analyses. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Thirty-seven studies, involving 100,142 patients were assessed. Compared to usual care, PSM significantly reduced the risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.68). For major bleeding, edoxaban 60 mg (0.80, 0.71-0.90), edoxaban 30 mg (0.48, 0.42-0.56), and dabigatran 110 mg (0.81, 0.71-0.94) significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with usual warfarin care. Cluster rank plot incorporating stroke and major bleeding outcomes indicates that some warfarin care bundles perform as well as NOACs. Both interventions are therefore viable options to be considered for SPAF. Additional studies including head-to-head trials and cost-effectiveness evaluation are still warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Bundles; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The objective was to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from a French national health insurance perspective.. A Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon and cycle length of 3 months. All inputs were drawn from real-world evidence (RWE) studies: data on baseline patient characteristics at model entry were obtained from a French RWE study, clinical event rates as well as persistence rates for the VKA treatment arm were estimated from a variety of RWE studies, and a meta-analysis provided comparative effectiveness for rivaroxaban compared to VKA. Model outcomes included costs (drug costs, clinical event costs, and VKA monitoring costs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years (LY) gained, incremental cost per QALY, and incremental cost per LY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model and to better understand the results drivers.. In the base-case analysis, the incremental total cost was €714 and the total incremental QALYs and LYs were 0.12 and 0.16, respectively. The resulting incremental cost/QALY and incremental cost/LY were €6,006 and €4,586, respectively. The results were more sensitive to the inclusion of treatment-specific utility decrements and clinical event rates.. Although there is no official willingness-to-pay threshold in France, these results suggest that rivaroxaban is likely to be cost-effective compared to VKA in French patients with AF from a national insurance perspective.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; France; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of uninterrupted, minimally interrupted (one dose skipped) or completely interrupted (24 h skipped) oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are poorly defined. We conducted a network meta-analysis to explore the effect of interrupted or uninterrupted oral anticoagulants in patients with AF undergoing ablation.. The Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies comparing uninterrupted, minimally interrupted or completely interrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with continuous or interrupted warfarin in patients undergoing AF ablation.. Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 5597 patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were included. For thromboembolism, minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.35), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.23) and continuous VKAs (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.21) were better than interrupted warfarin. The risk of total bleeding appeared higher in the completely interrupted NOAC group compared with the minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.18-6.37), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.05-4.38) and uninterrupted warfarin (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.02-4.08). To reduce the risk of total bleeding, minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.27), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.42) and uninterrupted warfarin (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.39) were better than interrupted warfarin. In the event of major bleeding, there was no significant difference in the interrupted NOAC, uninterrupted NOAC, interrupted VKA and uninterrupted VKA groups.. These three NOAC strategies may have similar safety and efficacy in terms of thromboembolism and major bleeding complications. The total bleeding risk of completely interrupted oral anticoagulants is higher than that of uninterrupted and minimally interrupted NOACs. For thromboembolism, minimally interrupted NOACs, uninterrupted NOACs and continuous VKAs were better than interrupted warfarin.

Topics: Ablation Techniques; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Several studies have examined the role of warfarin in preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease; however, the results remain inconclusive.. To assess recently published studies to examine the outcomes of the use of warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease.. A literature search was performed using the terms warfarin and atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease and warfarin and atrial fibrillation and dialysis in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2008, to February 28, 2019.. The studies included were those with patients with end-stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation who were receiving warfarin and with hazard ratios (HRs) of at least 1 primary outcome. The studies excluded were those with a lack of information on outcomes and unreliable 95% CIs of the results.. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed in selecting studies. Collected data were also scrutinized for reliable 95% CIs. Finally, studies were examined for perceived biases, their limitations, and the definitions of the outcomes.. The HRs and 95% CIs were calculated for the incidence of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality among patients receiving anticoagulants and those not receiving anticoagulants.. Study selection yielded 15 studies with a total of 47 480 patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease. Of these patients, 10 445 (22.0%) were taking warfarin. With a mean (SD) follow-up period of 2.6 (1.4) years, warfarin use was associated with no significant change for the risk of ischemic stroke (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.82-1.13), with a significantly higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-1.94), with no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47), and with no change in overall mortality (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.09).. In the studies reviewed, warfarin use appears to have been associated with no change in the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease. However, from the studies reviewed, it does appear to be associated with a significantly higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke, with no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding, and with no change in mortality.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2009 to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A random-effects model was applied in the pooled analysis.. A total of 14 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies) were included. Based on the randomized clinical trials, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Based on the observational studies, compared with VKAs, the subgroup analysis showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding.. Based on current data, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to the use of VKAs in AF patients for secondary stroke prevention irrespective of NOAC type.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly used for thromboembolic risk reduction and treatment of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. However, data regarding their efficacy and safety in comparison to warfarin for left atrial appendage thrombus is limited.. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Review from inception to 30 October 2019 was performed. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing warfarin vs NOACs were included. Two investigators independently extracted the data and individual quality assessment was performed. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.. Four studies met inclusion criteria and a total of 322 patients were included of whom 141 were in the NOAC arm and 181 were in the warfarin arm. There was no significant difference in thrombus resolution between the two groups (RR, 1.00; 95% CI [0.77-1.29; P = .98]). There was no significant difference in major bleeding (RR, 1.30; 95% CI [0.14-12.21; P = .82]) or stroke (RR, 0.42; 95% CI [0.09-2.06; P = .29]) between the two groups.. The results of our meta-analysis show that NOACs are as efficacious and safe as warfarin in the treatment of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends warfarin therapy over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with a body mass index >40 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Warfarin

Ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism are the major potentially preventable complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is mandatory for stroke prevention in AF. Following approval of the four NOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, the use of VKA is declining steadily. Increasing age with thresholds of 65 and 75 years is a strong risk factor when determining annual stroke risk in AF patients. Current recommendations such as the "2016 Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation" of the European Society of Cardiology and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update" by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society strengthen the importance of anticoagulation and detection of bleeding risks, of which older age is an important one. While patients aged ≥ 75 years are usually underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, they represent almost 40% of the trial populations in the large NOAC approval studies. Therefore, a sufficient amount of data is available to assess the efficacy and safety for this patient cohort in that specific indication. In this article, the evidence for stroke prevention in AF using either VKA or NOACs is summarised with a special focus on efficacy compared to bleeding risk in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Specifically, we used a model of increased weighing of intracranial bleeding to illustrate the potential benefit of NOACs over VKA in the elderly population. In brief, there are at least two tested strategies with apixaban and edoxaban which even confer an additional clinical net benefit compared with VKA. Furthermore, elderly subgroups of trials for combined antithrombotic treatment following percutaneous coronary interventions in anticoagulated patients are analysed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Data of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in current management of atrial fibrillation (AF) are predominantly derived from North American and European regions. However, the effects of NOACs for stroke prevention in Latin America remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs with warfarin in Latin American patients with AF.. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched until July 12, 2019 for applicable randomized clinical trials. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.. Four trials involving 8943 Latin American patients were included in this meta-analysis. In anticoagulated patients with AF, Latin American patients had higher rates of stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause death compared with non-Latin American subjects. Compared with warfarin use, the use of NOACs was significantly associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and any bleeding in Latin American patients. There were no significant differences in the risks of ischemic stroke, all-cause death, and gastrointestinal bleeding between Latin and non-Latin American groups. All the interactions between Latin and non-Latin American groups about efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs compared with warfarin were non-significant (all Pinteraction > .05).. Our meta-analysis suggested that the use of NOACs was at least non-inferior to warfarin use for stroke prevention in Latin American patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for perioperative anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published up to June 30, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.. Nineteen studies with a total of 6827 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The experimental group received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban; the control group received warfarin. The safety endpoints were bleeding complications; the efficacy endpoints were thromboembolic complications. Results were as follows: Patients with NOACs had a lower risk of overall bleeding complications (OR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.54, 0.87), P = 0.002), including major bleeding complications (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.84), P = 0.007) and minor bleeding complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.56, 0.94), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between NOACs and warfarin after CA (OR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.14, 1.10), P = 0.08).. In Japanese NVAF patients undergoing CA, NOACs have similar effects to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Moreover, NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Humans; Japan; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Decisions surrounding periprocedural anticoagulation management must balance thromboembolic and procedural bleed risk. The interruption of both warfarin and DOACs requires consideration of anticoagulant pharmacokinetics, procedural bleed risk and patient characteristics. There is a diminishing role for periprocedural bridging LMWH overall and no role for bridging LMWH for the procedural interruption of DOACs. A clinical approach to perioperative DOAC management based on operative bleeding risk and renal function is safe and effective, and at present, is preferred over preprocedural DOAC levels testing. Clear communication of the anticoagulation interruption plan to both the patient and the patient's care team is essential.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Warfarin

Patients with cancer are at higher risk of atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic complications and bleeding events compared with the general population. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral Xa inhibitor anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation.. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing direct oral Xa inhibitor anticoagulants and warfarin in cancer patients. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed to explore the outcome differences between patients with active cancer or history of cancer.. Three trials with a total of 3029 cancer patients were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of stroke or systemic embolism [risk ratio (RR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.10] between the two therapeutic strategies. Direct oral Xa inhibitors significantly reduced the incidence of major bleeding compared with warfarin (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; P = 0.04; number needed to treat = 113). These results were consistent both in patients with active cancer and in those with history of cancer.. In patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation, direct oral Xa inhibitors have a similar efficacy and may be safer compared with warfarin. These results are consistent both in patients with active cancer and history of cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Given the huge burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in Asia, stroke prevention represents an urgent issue in this region. We herein performed a network meta-analysis to examine the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with AF.. A systematic search of the publications was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies until July 2019. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the effect estimates. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for the ranking probabilities was calculated.. A total of 17 studies were included. For comparisons of NOACs vs warfarin, dabigatran (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), apixaban (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.65), but not edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, wheres dabigatran (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), apixaban (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), and edoxaban (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49) decreased the risk of major bleeding. In reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, apixaban and rivaroxaban ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 0.2% and 31.4%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (50.2%), edoxaban (75.2%), and warfarin (93.0%). In reducing the risk of major bleeding, edoxaban, and apixaban ranked the best and second best (1.5% and 30.8%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (48.4%), rivaroxaban (69.2%), and warfarin (100%).. NOACs were at least as effective as warfarin, but more safer in Asians with AF. Apixaban was superior to other NOACs for reducing stroke or systemic embolism, while edoxaban showed a better safety profile than other NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost of Illness; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To recommend the proper anticoagulant drug and its dose for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to make the comparisons among non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin with regard to efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding).. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library with the items: "dabigatran, edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, atrial fibrillation and heart failure" through April 14, 2020, focusing on the RCTs comparing the effect of NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF and HF. The NMA was performed based on R (version3.5.1) recalling JAGS (version4.3.0) with gemtc package. Moreover, NetMetaXL (version1.6.1) and winBUGS (version1.4.3) were employed to obtain the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) of the anticoagulants.. There was a high probability that dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.82) ranked the first for the most effective drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.81), edoxaban60 (SUCRA 0.57) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA 0.52). However, with respect to safety for preventing major bleeding, edoxaban30 (SUCRA 0.99) ranked as the safest drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.71), edoxaban 60 (SUCRA 0.59) and dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.55).. Apixaban, edoxaban60 and dabigatran150 were more likely to become the choice for preventing stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding in patients with AF and HF. Nevertheless, more trials need to be performed to focus on the effect of NOACs on the efficacy outcome due to the sparse data. In addition, caution should be excised over selecting the NOAC and its dose on account of the lacking head-to-head comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Failure; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both), and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence of APS is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with APS.. We last searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, and ongoing trials registers on 22 November 2019. We checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. We also contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or AP agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS, according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently worked on each step of the review, following Cochrane methods. We summarized the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We identified eight studies including 811 participants that compared different AP or anticoagulant agents. NOAC (non-VKA oral anticoagulant: rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (vitamin K antagonist: warfarin at moderate International Normalized Ratio [INR] - 2.5) or adjusted [INR 2.0-3.0] dose): In three studies there were no differences in any thromboembolic event (including death) and major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 14.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87 to 106.8; moderate-certainty evidence). One of the studies reported a small benefit of rivaroxaban in terms of quality of life at 180 days measured as health state on Visual Analogue Scale (mean difference [MD] 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-certainty evidence), but not measured as health utility on a scale from 0 to 1 (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10; low-certainty evidence). High-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 3.1 to 4.0 [mean 3.3] or 3.5 [mean 3.2]) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 [mean 2.3] or 2.5 [mean 2.5]): In two studies there were no differences in the rates of thrombotic events and major bleeding (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23, low-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of minor bleeding in one study during a mean of 3.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.2) of follow-up (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07). In both trials there was evidence of a higher risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-certainty evidence) in the high-dose VKA group, and for this outcome (any bleeding) the incidence is not different, only the time to event is showing an effect. Standard-dose VKA plus a single AP agent (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 plus aspirin 100 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0): One high-risk-of-bias study showed an increased risk of any thromboembolic event with combined treatment (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.43; low-certainty evidence) and reported on major bleeding with five cases in the combined treatment group and one case in the standard-dose VKA treatment group, resulting in RR 7.42 (95% CI 0.91 to 60.7; low-certainty evidence) and no differences for secondary outcomes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Single/dual AP agent and standard-dose VKA (pooled results): Two high-risk-of-bias studies compared a combination of AP and VKA (aspirin 100 mg/d plus warfarin or unspecified VKA at a target INR of. The evidence identified indicates that NOACs compared with standard-dose VKAs may increase the risk of stroke and do not appear to alter the risk of other outcomes (moderate-certainty evidence). Using high-dose VKA versus standard-dose VKA did not alter the risk of any thromboembolic event or major bleeding but may increase the risk of any form of bleeding (low-certainty evidence). Standard-dose VKA combined with an AP agent compared with standard-dose VKA alone may increase the risk of any thromboembolic event and does not appear to alter the risk of major bleeding or other outcomes (low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the benefit or harm of using standard-dose VKA plus AP agents versus single or dual AP therapy, or dual versus single AP therapy, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis in people with APS (very low-certainty evidence).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Cause of Death; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common concomitant diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Meta-analyses of multiple studies have shown that the risk of AF is higher for diabetic patients with impaired glucose homeostasis than for patients without DM. Patients with AF and DM were younger, more frequently had arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease, and stroke and were characterized with a more severe course of AF. The article discusses possible mechanisms of the mutually aggravating effects of DM and AF, scales for evaluating the risk of bleeding (CHADS2, CHA2DS2‑VASc, HAS-BLED), and the role of anticoagulants. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized clinical studies, including 9 874 patients, has demonstrated the efficacy of oral anticoagulants in prevention of stroke with an overall decrease in the relative risk by 62 % compared to placebo (95% confidence interval, from 48 to 72 ). For prevention of complications in patients with AF and DM, current antithrombotic therapies can be used, specifically the oral factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, which is the best studied in patients with AF and DM and represents a possible alternative to warfarin in such patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This review analyzes results of a large prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 that compared efficacy and safety of warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, and edoxaban, an oral inhibitor of activated coagulation factor X. The review addresses important practical aspects of using edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. They have been extensively studied in large trials involving patients affected by the most common cardiovascular diseases. As the presence of diabetes leads to peculiar changes in primary and secondary hemostasis, in this review we highlight the current evidence regarding DOAC use in diabetic patients included in the majority of recently conducted studies. Overall, in trials involving patients with atrial fibrillation, data seem to confirm at least a similar efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in patients with or without diabetes. Furthermore, in diabetic patients, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant relative reduction in vascular death compared to warfarin. In trials enrolling patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, results concerning bleeding events are consistent in patients with or without diabetes. With regards to the COMPASS study, in patients with diabetes (n = 10,241), addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg to aspirin resulted in a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.90; interaction p = 0.68) with higher rates of major bleeding expected (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-2.31). The 3287 patients with peripheral artery disease and diabetes receiving rivaroxaban plus aspirin had a twofold higher absolute reduction in the composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) than patients without diabetes. Finally, we report the involvement of cytochromes or P-glycoprotein on the metabolism of the most commonly prescribed glucose-lowering drugs. No clinically relevant interactions are expected during the concomitant use of DOACs and anti-diabetic agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Angiopathies; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to warfarin among Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear in the real-world setting.. We searched PubMed and Medline + Journals@Ovid + EMBASE from September 17, 2009 to May 4, 2019 to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational real-world studies comparing four DOACs with warfarin specifically focused on Asian patients with NVAF.. From the original 212 results retrieved, 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, DOACs were associated with lower risks of thromboembolism (hazard ratio; [95% confidence interval], 0.70; [0.63-0.78]), acute myocardial infarction (0.67; [0.57-0.79]), all-cause mortality (0.62; [0.56-0.69]), major bleeding (0.59; [0.50-0.69]), intracranial hemorrhage (0.50; [0.40-0.62]), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.66; [0.46-0.95]), and any bleeding (0.82; [0.73-0.92]) than warfarin. There was statistic heterogeneity between DOACs for the risks of thromboembolism (P interaction = 0.03) and acute myocardial infarction (P interaction = 0.007) when compared to warfarin. However, all DOACs showed lower risks of thromboembolism and acute myocardial infarction than warfarin when pooling studies that compared individual DOAC with warfarin. With regard to the other outcomes when compared to warfarin, there was no statistical heterogeneity between DOACs. In addition, the effectiveness and safety of four DOACs versus warfarin persisted in the subgroups of either standard-dose or low-dose DOACs.. The meta-analysis shows that the DOACs had greater effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in real-world practice for stroke prevention, among Asian patients with NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common conditions, but for patients affected with both, there is a lack of data about management of anticoagulation and cerebrovascular outcomes. In the first section of this review, we summarize the most relevant studies on stroke risk and management of AF in patients with active cancer, attempting to answer questions of whether to anticoagulate, whom to anticoagulate, and what agents to use. In the second section of the review, we suggest a decision algorithm on the basis of the available evidence and provide practical recommendations for each of the anticoagulant options. In the third section, we discuss the limitations of the available evidence. On the basis of low-quality evidence, we find that patients with cancer and AF have a risk of stroke similar to that of the general population but a substantially higher risk of bleeding regardless of the anticoagulant agent used; this makes anticoagulation-related decisions complex and evidence from the general population not immediately applicable. In general, we suggest stopping anticoagulation in patients with high risk of bleeding and in those with a moderate bleeding risk without a high thromboembolic risk and recommend anticoagulation as in the general population for patients at a low risk for bleeding. However, regardless of initial therapy, we recommend reassessing whether anticoagulation should be given at each point in the clinical course of the disease. High-quality evidence to guide anticoagulation for AF in patients with cancer is needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

There is a lack of clear benefit and a potential risk of bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how treatment with DOACs affects stroke and bleeding outcomes compared with warfarin or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series, and searched electronic databases from 1946 to 2017. Studies evaluating stroke and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients were included.. From 8008 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. For moderate CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate  <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), there was no difference in stroke outcomes between dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.21], rivaroxaban (HR 0.82-0.84, 95% CI 0.25-2.69) and edoxaban (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18) versus warfarin. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) and apixaban reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism significantly more than warfarin for moderate CKD patients (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, respectively). Edoxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.50-0.76) compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg showed no significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, there was no difference in stroke outcomes between apixaban, dabigatran [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99] or rivaroxaban (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.89-3.64) versus warfarin. In HD patients, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with an increased major bleeding risk (RR 1.45-1.76), whereas there was no major bleeding difference with apixaban compared to warfarin.. The heterogeneity of major bleeding and stroke definitions of the 10 included studies.. Clinicians should continue to weigh the risk of stroke versus bleeding before prescribing DOACs in the CKD and dialysis population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To assess the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.. A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias.. A total of 27 different studies publishing data in 30 publications were included. In the studies with a follow-up up to 1 year, apixaban (HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71-1.20) and dabigatran (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.80-1.13) did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.73-0.94). Apixaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.80) and dabigatran (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.97) significantly reduced the major bleeding risk vs warfarin, but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.95-1.10), although with a high statistical heterogeneity among studies. Apixaban (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.42-0.73), dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.39-0.51), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.49-0.88) significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding vs warfarin. Reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a slightly better safety profile, but with a marked reduction in stroke prevention effectiveness.. Data from this meta-analysis suggest that, vs warfarin, the stroke prevention effectiveness and bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants may differ in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Amiodarone is a potent inhibitor of the CYP450:3A4 and inhibitor of the P-glycoprotein, both of which metabolize new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Patients who are on NOACs and are concomitantly treated with amiodarone may have a higher risk of major bleeding according to recent retrospective trials. Whether this increased risk outweighs the benefits of NOACs compared to warfarin is unknown. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between NOACs and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) being treated with amiodarone.. We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase for randomized controlled trials that compared NOACs to warfarin for prophylaxis of ischemic stroke/thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with AF and reported outcomes on TE, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding (ICB). Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Fixed effects model was used, and if heterogeneity (I2) was > 25%, effects were analyzed using a random model.. A total of four studies comparing NOACs to warfarin were included in the analysis. The total number of patients on amiodarone was 6197. Mean follow up was 23 ± 5 months. No statistically significant difference for TE prevention (RR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.50-1.07), major bleeding (RR, 1.02; 95% CI 0.68-1.53), or ICB outcomes (RR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.22-1.51) between patients on NOACs + amiodarone when compared to patients on warfarin + amiodarone.. Among patients with AF taking amiodarone, there is no increased risk of stroke, major bleeding, or ICB with NOACs compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) are at higher risk for myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, often require antiplatelet therapy and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of bleeding. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant CAD.. We performed a trial-level meta-analysis of CAD subgroups from four trials of NOAC versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, comparing the primary trial endpoints (efficacy: stroke or systemic embolic event; safety: International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding) in patients with versus those without CAD, and used interaction testing to assess for treatment effect modification.. In total, 58,606 patients with established CAD were included in this meta-analysis. NOACs reduced the risk of stroke/systemic embolic event irrespective of presence of CAD (CAD: 0.76 (0.56-1.04); no CAD: hazard ratio 0.77 (0.56-1.06);. The present meta-analysis of four trials supports that NOACs are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and established CAD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive cannabinoid in cannabis, may inhibit the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2C9. Consequently, cannabis use might infer a risk of drug-drug interaction with substrates for this enzyme, which includes drugs known to have a narrow therapeutic window. In this study, we describe a case report of a 27-year-old man treated with warfarin due to mechanical heart valve replacement who presented with elevated international normalized ratio (INR) value (INR = 4.6) following recreational cannabis use. We conducted a review of the available literature, using the PubMed and EMBASE databases while following PRISMA guidelines. Following screening of 85 articles, three eligible articles were identified, including one in vitro study and two case reports. The in vitro study indicated that THC inhibits the CYP2C9-mediated metabolism of warfarin. One case study reported of a man who on two occasions of increased marijuana use experienced INR values above 10 as well as bleeding. The other case study reported of a patient who initiated treatment with a liquid formulation of cannabidiol for the management of epilepsy, ultimately necessitating a 30% reduction in warfarin dose to maintain therapeutic INR values. The available, although sparse, data suggest that use of cannabinoids increases INR values in patients receiving warfarin. Until further data are available, we suggest patients receiving warfarin be warned against cannabis use.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Cannabis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors; Dronabinol; Drug Interactions; Endocarditis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Marijuana Smoking; Stroke; Substance-Related Disorders; Warfarin

Four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been evaluated in clinical trials for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although each of the NOACs have been shown to be at least non-inferior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes, controversy remains over the relative safety of each NOAC inpatient subgroups. This narrative review provides an overview of phase III data on NOAC trials for the prevention of stroke in AF, with a focus on reporting the safety of each agent in key patient subgroups based on age, gender, accumulated risk factors, and primary or secondary prevention of stroke.. A comprehensive literature search was completed and, where data permit, analyses of phase III trials of the NOACs are presented for each patient subgroup.. Analyses of key safety outcomes from NOAC trials were completed using primary trial data, including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The safety of NOACs was generally consistent and favourable compared with warfarin according to patient age, gender, previous history of stroke, and the presence of risk factors for stroke.. The safety of the NOACs compared with warfarin was generally favourable across different patient subgroups, including those perceived to be at "high risk" for adverse outcomes. However, certain NOACs may be preferable to warfarin in some subgroups, based on indirect analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases a patient's stroke risk four- to five-fold. Anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 67%, but warfarin carries a significant risk of major bleeding and has unpredictable pharmacodynamics with a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating frequent monitoring of its anticoagulant effect. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban provide more predictable anticoagulant activity than warfarin with a lower risk of major bleeding, and each is noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke. All have earned regulatory approval in the past eight years. At least one of the NOACs is approved for use in all patients with AF, except those with mechanical valves and rheumatic mitral valve disease, for whom warfarin remains the only option. Recent clinical trials have shown that antithrombotic regimens including NOACs are safe and effective in patients with AF who need potent antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard for oral anticoagulation. However, they carry several problems in older patients: frequent bleeding complications, complex management, risk of interactions with multiple drugs. Two classes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) are currently available in France: (a) direct thrombin inhibitors: dabigatran; and (b) direct factor Xa inhibitors: rivaroxaban, apixaban and others. Their management is easier: quickly effective after administration, they are given at fixed doses and do not need regular laboratory monitoring. Several randomized trials have shown that DOA are non-inferior to VKA for treating venous thromboembolic disease (prophylactic or curative treatment) and atrial fibrillation (prevention of associated embolisms). DOA might be also effective for long-term treatment of coronary disease, in some cases. No trial has specifically studied older patients. In the context of atrial fibrillation, subgroup analysis show similar results between patients above and below 75-years-old. Lower doses of dabigatran and apixaban should be used in many older people. All DOA are eliminated at least partly by kidneys. Their dose must be reduced in moderate renal failure (filtration glomerular rate (FGR) 30 to 50mL/min) and they are contraindicated in older patients with severe renal failure (FGR<30mL/min). DOA also have other problems: (a) important drug interactions are still possible, (b) the clinical application of specific coagulation tests need to be defined, (c) their safety in some subgroups of elderly patients, very different from patients included in clinical trials, is not known.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Contraindications, Drug; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients to lower the risk of ischaemic stroke. Given the lack of head-to-head comparisons among oral anticoagulants, a Bayesian analysis was used to evaluate their safety and efficacy based on studies from real-world practice.. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. Bayesian analyses were conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants.. In the 22 studies included in our analysis, novel oral anticoagulants exhibited a clear advantage over warfarin in preventing ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and, especially, intracranial haemorrhage. Incidence of major bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban. Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was lowest for apixaban, followed by warfarin, and was slightly lower for dabigatran than for rivaroxaban with no statistical difference (HR 1.05, 95% CrI 0.99-1.11). Ischaemic stroke risk was lowest for rivaroxaban, followed by apixaban, dabigatran and warfarin (HR 1.13, 95% CrI 1.07-1.20).. In real-world practice, apixaban may represent the optimal treatment in terms of safety and efficacy for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For patients with high risk of ischaemic events but low bleeding risk, rivaroxaban may be preferable.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require dose reductions according to patient or clinical factors for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess outcomes with reduced-dose NOACs when given as pre-specified in pivotal trials.. Aggregated data abstracted from Phase III trials comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF were assessed by treatment using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction. Irrespective of treatments, annualized rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were higher in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs than in those eligible for full-dose NOACs (2.70% vs. 1.60% and 4.35% vs. 2.87%, respectively). Effects of reduced-dose NOACs compared with warfarin in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs on stroke or systemic embolism [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03)] and on major bleeding [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)] were consistent with those of full-dose NOACs relative to warfarin in those eligible for full-dose NOACs [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for stroke or systemic embolism and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.08) for major bleeding; interaction P, 0.89 and 0.26, respectively]. In addition, NOACs were associated with reduced risks of haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and death regardless of patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction (interaction P > 0.05 for each).. Patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs were at elevated risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications when treated with anticoagulants. NOACs, when appropriately dose-adjusted, had an improved benefit-harm profile compared with warfarin. Our findings highlight the importance of prescribing reduced-dose NOACs for indicated patient populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Patients with CKD represent a vulnerable population where the risks of atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, and bleeding are all heightened. Although large randomized, controlled trials in the general population clearly demonstrate that the benefits of warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulants outweigh the risks of bleeding, no such studies have been conducted in patients when their creatinine clearance falls below 25-30 ml/min. Without randomized, controlled trial data, the role of anticoagulation in patients with CKD with atrial fibrillation remains unclear and our practice is informed by a growing body of imperfect literature such as observational and pharmacokinetic studies. This article aims to present a contemporary literature review of the benefits versus harms of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation for patients with CKD stages 3, 4, 5, and 5 on dialysis. Although unanswered questions and areas of clinical equipoise remain, this piece serves to assist physicians in interpreting the complex body of literature and applying it to their clinical care.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

The atrial fibrillation-related stroke is clearly prevented by anticoagulation treatment, however, management of anticoagulation for AF in patients with cirrhosis represents a challenge due to bleeding concerns. To address this issue, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed.. A literature search for studies reporting the incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database, from inception through July 2018.. 7 cohort studies including 19,798 patients with AF and cirrhosis were identified. The use of anticoagulation (%) among included studies ranged from 8.3% to 53.9%. Anticoagulation use for AF in patients with cirrhosis was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke, with a pooled HR of 0.58 (95%CI: 0.35-0.96). When compared with no anticoagulation, the use of anticoagulation was not significantly associated with a higher risk of bleeding, with a pooled HR of 1.45 (95%CI: 0.96-2.17). Compared to warfarin, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with a lower risk of bleeding among AF patients with cirrhosis.. Our study demonstrates that anticoagulation use for AF in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a reduced risk of stroke, without increasing significantly the risk of bleeding, when compared to those without anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa; Heart Diseases; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be regarded as some of the most successful innovations in recent times. These drugs which were specifically developed to overcome the challenges posed by warfarin did just that and in the process, have changed the outlook towards stroke prevention with anticoagulation. The decade of experience with these drugs that has resulted in the availability of large scale data on their safety profile has aided this. Areas covered: This review examines existing real-world studies (RWS) and their interpretation to better appreciate how they either complement or contradict findings from the hallmark trials. Specific focus has been made on the safety of DOACs, on their risks of major bleeding, intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and each other. DOAC use in the elderly and other sub-groups are briefly discussed. Expert opinion: Results for safety outcomes according to 'real world evidence' (RWE) are in-keeping with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and currently, all 4 DOACs have been deemed at least as effective as warfarin, while demonstrating superiority in some aspects. While real world studies act as a complementary source of knowledge, traditional RCTs remain the gold standard for determining cause-effect relationships.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

This article aims to review the latest literature on prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation and the safety profile of anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis.. The understanding of hematological hemostasis is cirrhotic patients has changed drastically in recent years. Although in the past, cirrhotic patients were often considered to be 'auto-anticoagulated' and at higher risk of bleeding, recent studies have demonstrated that there may be a rebalance in procoagulation and anticoagulation factors in patients with cirrhosis. This, and clinical experience, suggest that cirrhotic patients are at risk of development of venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and ischemic strokes and as such, the best management approaches in these patients remains controversial. The bulk of the data suggest that patients with cirrhosis who are at risk for thrombotic or embolic complications should be anticoagulated. However, it is imperative that they be closely monitored.. The medical literature on anticoagulation in patients with liver cirrhosis is conflicting and limited to small sample observational studies. However, most studies suggest that in patients with early stages of liver cirrhosis and no history of varices, anticoagulation appears to be well tolerated.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Blood Coagulation Factors; Comorbidity; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Liver Cirrhosis; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Portal Vein; Prothrombin Time; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including the comparison of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Network meta-analysis. Two authors independently extracted data. All authors evaluated overall confidence in the evidence.. Eighteen RCTs included in our review, a total of 78,796 patients with AF, with sample sizes from 90 to 21,105 patients. Apixaban 5 mg (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.95), dabigatran 110 mg (0.91, 0.74-1.12), dabigatran 150 mg (0.66, 0.53-0.82), edoxaban 60 mg (0.87, 0.74-1.02), and rivaroxaban 20 mg (0.88, 0.74-1.03) reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin. Dabigatran 150 mg had the highest P-score for reducing stroke or systemic embolic events. The risk of haemorhagic stroke and all-cause mortality was lower with all NOACs than with warfarin. Apixaban 5 mg (0.69, 0.60-0.80), dabigatran 110 mg (0.80, 0.69-0.93), dabigatran 150 mg (0.93, 0.80-1.08), edoxaban 30 mg (0.46, 0.40-0.54), and edoxaban 60 mg (0.78, 0.69-0.90) reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Edoxaban 30 mg had the highest P-score for reducing major bleeding. The plots of P-scores rank showed that apixaban offered the most favorable balance of efficacy and safety.. This study adds an attempt for treatment ranking of both efficacy and safety outcomes. Future trials comparing directly NOACs are needed in order to provide conclusive proofs for these results and not only circumstantial evidence offered by a network meta-analysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban is the last direct oral anticoagulant marketed for the prevention of stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Areas covered: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of edoxaban 60 mg once daily. After the publication of this study, a great number of substudies and post hoc analyses have been published, together with some observational studies. The aim of this review was to update the current evidence about the use of edoxaban in AF patients. Expert opinion: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban 60 mg was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, but significantly reduced the risk of bleeding, major adverse cardiac events and death from cardiovascular causes. The relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60 mg compared with warfarin were independent of different clinical conditions, such as prior stroke, age, risk of falls, renal function, hepatic disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, or cancer. Data about the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in real-life patients are scarce, but consistent with those of the pivotal clinical trial. Edoxaban seems a cost-effective alternative to warfarin among AF patients with moderate to high thromboembolic risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulant therapy is the most effective strategy to prevent arterial and venous thromboembolism, but treating older individuals is challenging, because increasing age, comorbidities, and polypharmacy increase the risk of both thrombosis and bleeding. Warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are underused and often underdosed in the prevention of stroke in older patients with atrial fibrillation because of concerns about the risk of bleeding. Poor adherence to anticoagulant therapy is also an issue for older patients with atrial fibrillation and those at risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism. In this review, we present 5 clinical cases to illustrate common challenges with anticoagulant use in older patients and discuss our approach to institute safe and effective antithrombotic therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Liver Diseases; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Clinical guidelines recommend peri-cardioversion anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion.. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing DOACs to VKAs in patients undergoing cardioversion for AF. We performed title, abstract, and full-text screening, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation independently and in duplicate. We pooled data using a random effects model and evaluated the overall quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.. We identified three eligible RCTs (n = 5203) and 21 observational studies (n = 11,855). The three RCTs and four observational studies were at low risk of bias. In RCTs (mean follow-up, 30 days), thromboembolic events occurred in 0.18% of patients receiving DOACs, as compared with 0.55% receiving VKAs (relative risk [RR] 0.40, 95% CI [0.13, 1.24], moderate quality). Major bleeding occurred in 0.42% of patients receiving DOACs as compared with 0.64% receiving VKAs (RR 0.62, 95% CI [0.28, 1.35], moderate quality), and death occurred in 0.28% of patients receiving DOACs as compared with 0.38% receiving VKAs (RR 0.70, 95% CI [0.23, 2.10], low quality). Confidence in the estimates of effect for observational studies was very low.. DOACs peri-cardioversion in patients with AF appears safe from both a bleeding and thromboembolic risk perspective. Available evidence supports the use of DOACs as standard of care peri-cardioversion in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The clinical doses of antithrombotics-antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents-need to balance efficacy and safety. It is not clear from the published literature how the doses currently used in clinical practice have been derived from preclinical and clinical data. There are few large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare outcomes with different doses vs placebo. For newer antithrombotics, RCT doses appear to have been chosen to maximise the probability of demonstrating noninferiority when compared to established agents such as warfarin or clopidogrel. Data from RCTs show that aspirin is an effective antithrombotic at doses below 75 mg daily, and that direct oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke in patients with coronary disease at doses 1/4 of those recommended in atrial fibrillation. Lower doses than those currently recommended are safer and still maintain substantial efficacy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved for use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF).. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin in AF and valvular heart disease (VHD).. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post-hoc analyses comparing NOACs and warfarin in AF and VHD, including biological and mechanical heart valves (MHV). Through systematic review and meta-analysis, with the aid of the "Rev Man" program 5.3, the primary effectiveness endpoints were stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the secondary outcome included intracranial hemorrhage. Data were analyzed using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I. Six RCTs were included, involving 13,850 patients with AF and VHD. NOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.91; P = 0.002) and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.79; P = 0.003) and lowered the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.02; P = 0.07) compared with warfarin.. The efficacy and safety of NOACs as thromboprophylaxis for AF and VHD are similar to those of warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Data regarding the efficacy and safety of warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain scarce.. Fifteen studies (7 comparing NOAC vs warfarin and 8 comparing warfarin vs no anticoagulant) were identified comprising 78,053 patients. Warfarin (vs no anticoagulant) was associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke (risk ratio [RR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.84]) and mortality (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.78). In comparison to warfarin, NOAC use lowered the risk of ICH (RR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.33-0.56), stroke. Among patients with CKD treated with oral anticoagulants, NOACs present with a more favorable safety and efficacy profile for various cardiovascular outcomes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin is the standard of care and NOAC (Novel oral anticoagulants) are a group of newer drugs for such purposes. NOAC has a generally better profile (Clear interaction, less side effect, require less monitoring). However, its efficacy on valvular atrial fibrillation remains unclear.. We researched literature articles from Embase, Cochrane and PubMed. Then we meta-analysed these six articles to assess pooled estimate of relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) using random-effects model for stroke, systemic embolic event, major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Heterogeneity across study was tested with Cochran's Q Test and I. We collected 496 articles in total and finally we included six articles in our meta-analysis. For SSEE (Stroke, Systemic Embolic Event), the pooled relative risk showed a significantly better clinical outcome of NOAC (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.95). However, there is no significant difference in major bleeding (RR: 0.714, 95% CI:0.46 to 1.11) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.21).. Compared to Warfarin, NOAC is significantly more protective against the embolic event, but no significant difference in lowering risk of major bleeding, all-cause mortality or all aspects of post-TAVI (Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The goal of this paper is to review literature on the topic of anticoagulation resumption after stroke from atrial fibrillation. Following ischemic stroke, the average annual risk of recurrent stroke in a patient with a CHADS2 score of 9 is 12.2%%, translating to an average daily risk of 0.03%%. Oral anticoagulant therapy provides a 75% relative risk reduction. However, in the 2-week period immediately following an acute stroke, this daily risk appears to be elevated. The same period is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke due to reperfusion, impaired autoregulation, and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Use of thrombolytics and anticoagulants, baseline infarct size, presence of microhemorrhages, and evidence of hemorrhagic transformation further increases the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic. The decision to resume anticoagulation early after ischemic stroke from atrial fibrillation must carefully balance the risks of hemorrhagic transformation with the risk of recurrent stroke. There are currently 4 trials in progress at present (OPTIMAS, ELAN, TIMING, and START) comparing different anticoagulant resumption protocols after stroke in patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. There are a number of major limitations of the studies to date on the timing of anticoagulation resumption on stroke in atrial fibrillation. For instance, they do not explicitly account for infarct size, presence/absence of hemorrhagic transformation, recanalization via mechanical thrombectomy, and bleeding diatheses such as liver synthetic dysfunction or thrombocytopenia. These factors are crucial in personalizing a treatment decision to an individual patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Precision Medicine; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Algorithms; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Genetic; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Current guidelines endorse the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about their safety and efficacy in valvular heart disease (VHD). Similarly, there is a paucity of data regarding NOACs use in patients with a bioprosthetic heart valve (BPHV). We, therefore, performed a network meta-analysis in the subgroups of VHD and meta-analysis in patients with a BPHV.. PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched for randomised controlled trials. Summary effects were estimated by the random-effects model. The outcomes of interest were a stroke or systemic embolisation (SSE), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH).. In patients with VHD, rivaroxaban was associated with more ICH and major bleeding than other NOACs, while edoxaban 30 mg was associated with least major bleeding. Data combining all NOACs showed a significant reduction in SSE, MI and ICH (0.70, [0.57 to 0.85; p<0.001]; 0.70 [0.50 to 0.99; p<0.002]; and 0.46 [0.24 to 0.86; p<0.01], respectively). Analysis of 280 patients with AF and a BPHV showed similar outcomes with NOACs and warfarin.. NOACs performed better than warfarin for a reduction in SSE, MI and ICH in patients with VHD. Individually NOACs performed similarly to each other except for an increased risk of ICH and major bleeding with rivaroxaban and a reduced risk of major bleeding with edoxaban 30 mg. In patients with a BPHV, results with NOACs seem similar to those with warfarin and this needs to be further explored in larger studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant in hemodialysis (HD) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Recent trends show that Nephrologists are increasingly prescribing novel oral anticoagulants, despite the fact that no randomized clinical trials have been conducted in dialysis patients. Difficulties maintaining international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and concerns regarding warfarin-induced vascular calcification and calciphylaxis may be responsible. Anticoagulation quality is poor in HD patients. A variety of factors contribute to this: increased antibiotic exposure; comorbid illness; decreased adherence and vitamin K deficiency. Attempts to address this with standardized protocols have been uniformly unsuccessful. In nonadherent patients, thrice weekly observed therapy improved quality. Low-dose vitamin K supplementation improves time in the therapeutic range (TTR) in those with normal kidney function and should be studied in HD patients given their high frequency of vitamin K deficiency. Vascular and valvular calcification associated with warfarin could result from reduced carboxylation of matrix Gla protein (MGP), a well-known inhibitor of vascular calcification. Multiple observational studies also link calciphylaxis to warfarin; warfarin-induced hypercoagulability and decreased carboxylation of MGP could explain this. A large observational study, two meta-analyses, and a systematic review in HD patients with NVAF showed reduced bleeding with apixaban compared to warfarin with similar efficacy in reducing stroke and systemic embolism. Given these results, apixaban is a reasonable alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation of HD patients with NVAF, especially in those with low TTR, until data from randomized clinical trials become available.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Drug Substitution; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Needs Assessment; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. However, none of the randomized controlled trials included patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) leaving a lack of evidence in this large, challenging and unique patient group. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) with AF have additional risk factors for stroke due to vascular comorbidities, HD treatment, age, and diabetes. Conversely, they are also at increased risk of major bleeding due to uremic platelet impairment. Anticoagulants increase bleeding risk in patients with ESRD and HD up to 10-fold compared with non chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on warfarin. There are conflicting data and recommendations regarding use of OACs in ESRD which will be reviewed in this article. We conclude by proposing a modified strategy for OAC use in ESRD based on the latest evidence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation significantly reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and the decision to initiate therapy is based on assessing the patient's yearly risk of stroke. Although warfarin remains the drug of choice in patients with AF and artificial mechanical valves, the novel anticoagulation agents are becoming the drug of choice for all other patients with AF, because of their efficacy, safety, and ease of use. This article summarizes the current evidence for stroke prevention in AF, including valvular AF, subclinical AF, AF in patients with renal insufficiency, as well as stroke prevention around AF cardioversion.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

the study analysed the effectiveness and safety of warfarin use compared with warfarin non-use and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients aged ≥65 years.. after searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library, 26 studies were included, with 10 comparing warfarin with warfarin non-use and 16 comparing warfarin with NOACs, in older AF patients (≥65 years).. warfarin use was superior to no antithrombotic therapy [relative risk (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.76, I2 = 12.3%, n = 8] and aspirin (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, I2 = 0.0%, n = 5) for stroke/thromboembolism (TE) prevention. Warfarin use was associated with a non-significant increase in risk of major bleeding compared with no antithrombotic therapy (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.52, I2 = 0.0%, n = 7) and aspirin (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91-1.50, I2 = 0.0%, n = 5). NOACs were superior to warfarin for stroke/TE prevention [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, I2 = 56.6%, n = 9], and also were associated with reduced risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.87, 0.77-0.97, I2 = 86.1%, n = 9).. warfarin use was superior to warfarin non-use, aspirin and no antithrombotic therapy in reducing the risk of stroke/TE in older AF patients, but with a possible increase in major bleeding. NOACs were superior to warfarin for stroke/TE prevention, with reduced risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Patient Safety; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The use of oral anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation has been transformed by the availability of the nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Real-world studies on the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants would help elucidate their effectiveness and safety in daily clinical practice. Apixaban was the third nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants introduced to clinical practice, and increasing real-world studies have been published. Our aim was to summarize current evidence about real-world studies on apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational real-world studies comparing apixaban with other available oral anticoagulant drugs.. From the original 9680 results retrieved, 16 studies have been included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin, apixaban regular dose was more effective in reducing any thromboembolic event (odds ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.93), but no significant difference was found for stroke risk. Apixaban was as effective as dabigatran and rivaroxaban in reducing thromboembolic events and stroke. The risk of major bleeding was significantly lower for apixaban compared with warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban (relative risk reduction, 38%, 35%, and 46%, respectively). Similarly, the risk for intracranial hemorrhage was significantly lower for apixaban than warfarin and rivaroxaban (46% and 54%, respectively) but not dabigatran. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was lower with apixaban when compared with all oral anticoagulant agents (. Use of apixaban in real-life is associated with an overall similar effectiveness in reducing stroke and any thromboembolic events when compared with warfarin. A better safety profile was found with apixaban compared with warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Polymers; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Saliva, Artificial; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a better risk benefit profile in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether treatment effects could be modified by drug class and dependency on renal elimination of studied agents has not yet been explored.. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases through November 2016 for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with AF. Efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled according to drug class and dependency on renal elimination of DOACs and were compared with the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Effect differences were assessed with Bucher's indirect comparisons using common estimates, once heterogeneity was low, and with the Bayesian method.. Among 6496 Asian patients from 6 trials, both direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, compared with warfarin, were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.51 [0.33-0.78], 0.74 ([0.58-0.96], 0.60 [0.41-0.86], and 0.59 [0.47-0.76], respectively). There was no between-group difference in direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors or in DOACs with renal elimination less than 50% and 50% or greater (all I. DOACs, as a therapeutic class, outperform warfarin in efficacy and safety in Asian patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Elimination; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at a higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events compared with younger patients; therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in this population is crucial. Recent studies have shown that because the risk of stroke increases with age more than the risk of bleeding, the absolute benefit of oral anticoagulation is the highest in elderly patients in whom it outweighs the risk of bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed as a treatment for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke to overcome some limitations of warfarin, such as the need for frequent monitoring, labile INR values requiring frequent dose adjustment, dietary and drugs interactions, and increased risk of intracranial bleeding. Despite the better safety profiles of DOACs compared with warfarin, elderly patients often remain undertreated because of the fear of bleeding complications. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the risks of thromboembolisms and bleeding in different antithrombotic strategies in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation, including data from the warfarin-controlled phase 3 DOACs trials.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Health Services for the Aged; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Safety; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

AMPLATZER devices preceded WATCHMAN occluder in 2002 for catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion. The AMPLATZER technique facilitates simultaneous closure of atrial shunts using two devices through one gear. Randomized WATCHMAN follow-up data showed a mortality benefit over warfarin. AMPLATZER data make this likely valid for the strategy. Particularly young people with atrial fibrillation should be offered left atrial appendage occlusion because the risk is confined to the intervention and early postintervention period. Guidelines should be adapted to make this progress in prevention of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation accessible for all, in the sense of a mechanical vaccination.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Fluoroscopy; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Implantation; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Therapeutic Occlusion; Warfarin

Anticoagulation therapy is the fundamental approach for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Numerous systematic reviews comparing anticoagulation strategies have been published. We aim to summarize the efficacy and safety evidence of these strategies in AF patients from previously published systematic reviews.. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception to Feb 24th, 2017, to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that assessed interventions or strategies to improve oral anticoagulant use in AF patients.. Thirty-four systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion but only 11 were included in the qualitative analyses, corresponding to 40 unique meta-analyses, as the remaining systematic reviews had overlapping primary studies. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics for stroke prevention in AF patients. Conversely, patient's self-management and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), in general were superior to warfarin for preventing stroke and reducing mortality. All interventions showed comparable risk of major bleeding with warfarin.. Findings from this overview support the superiority of NOACs and patient's self-management for preventing stroke in AF patients. However, uncertainties remain on the benefits of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics due to poor quality evidence, and future research is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Review Literature as Topic; Risk Factors; Self Care; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are increasingly prevalent in the general population and share common risk factors such as older age, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The presence of CKD increases the risk of incident AF, and, likewise, AF increases the risk of CKD development and/or progression. Both conditions are associated with substantial thromboembolic risk, but patients with advanced CKD also exhibit a paradoxical increase in bleeding risk. In the landmark randomized clinical trials that compared non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF, the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD were similar to those in patients without CKD. Dose adjustment of NOACs as per the prescribing label is required in this population. Owing to limited trial data, evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with AF and severe CKD or end-stage renal disease on dialysis are lacking. Observational cohort studies have reported conflicting results, and the management of these particularly vulnerable patients remains challenging and requires careful assessment of stroke and bleeding risk and, where appropriate, use of warfarin with good-quality anticoagulation control.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

We evaluated the dose-dependent efficacy, safety, and all-cause mortality of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in "atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were OAC-naïve," or "AF patients with prior-stroke history" with those who were known to be high-risk subgroups under OAC.. After a systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), five phase-III randomized trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in "OAC-naïve/OAC-experienced," or "with/without prior-stroke history" subgroups were included. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model to determine the relative risk (RR) for stroke/systemic thromboembolism (SSTE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality.. In conclusion, standard-dose NOAC showed lower all-cause mortality than warfarin in OAC-naïve patients with AF, and low-dose NOAC was better than warfarin among the patients with prior-stroke history in terms of all-cause mortality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In this review we present data on prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with nonvalvular AF and T2D combined with CKD have elevated risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic complications, as well as of all cause death. Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) depend on comorbidities and can be determined by the presence of T2D and/or diabetic nephropathy. Use of warfarin in CKD in some cases provides no preventive effect relative to risk of stroke and is characterized by increased risk of bleeding because of poor INR control, and possibly development of calcification of arteries. Presence of diabetic nephropathy requires monitoring of renal filtration function for correction of doses or selection of another anticoagulant. Lack of data from randomized controlled trials hampers choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with terminal CKD on hemodialysis or after renal transplantation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Humans; Prognosis; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are surpassing warfarin as the anticoagulant of choice for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. DOAC outcomes in elective periprocedural settings have not been well elucidated and remain a source of concern for clinicians. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the periprocedural safety and efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. We reviewed the literature for data from phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in the periprocedural period among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Substudies from 4 trials (RE-LY [Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy], ROCKET AF [Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation], ARISTOTLE [Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation], and ENGAGE-AF [Effective Anticoagulation With Factor xA Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation]) were included in the meta-analysis. DOACs as a group and warfarin were compared in terms of the 30-day pooled risk for stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death, according to whether the study drug was interrupted or not periprocedurally. The overall relative risk (RR) was estimated with a random-effects model. The I. The short-term safety and efficacy of DOACs and warfarin are not different in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation periprocedurally. Under an uninterrupted anticoagulation strategy, DOACs are associated with a 38% lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The optimal antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing coronary stenting is unknown. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy (TT; warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; clopidogrel plus aspirin) in those patients.. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies enrolling AF patients undergoing coronary stenting on TT and DAPT up to September 2016, and fourteen studies were included. Efficacy outcomes included ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI); safety outcome was major bleeding. We conducted meta-analysis and used odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare TT and DAPT. Meta-regression, sensitivity and subgroup analysis were taken to investigate the source of heterogeneity in the outcome of major bleeding.. 14 eligible observational studies with 11,697 subjects were identified. Compared with DAPT, TT had decreased the risk of ischemic stroke [OR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.59, 0.93), P = 0.009] and stent thrombosis [OR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.18, 0.93), P = 0.033]. While, there was an increased risk of major bleeding [OR = 1.55, 95% CI (1.16, 2.09), P = 0.004] associated with TT. The risk of MACE, all-cause mortality and MI had no significant statistical difference between TT and DAPT. Furthermore, the results of univariate and multivariate meta-regression analysis implicated that there were no obvious correlations between certain baseline characteristics (age, gender, race, hypertension, study design) and risk of major bleeding. Also of major bleeding, the findings of sensitivity analysis were generally robust, and a prespecified subgroup analysis of race demonstrated that the source of heterogeneity might attribute to Asian studies mostly.. TT reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and stent thrombosis with an acceptable major bleeding risk compared with DAPT, and TT was considered as a valid alternative in AF patients undergoing coronary stenting. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to ensure the reliability of these data and find the optimal therapeutic strategy in this setting of patients.

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a valid alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy for the prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Areas covered: Antithrombotic therapy following interventional LAAO is critical in balancing the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding during the endothelialization of the implanted devices. In this article, the most recent clinical trials are reviewed and the current real-world antithrombotic strategies following LAAO device implantation are discussed. Expert commentary: For patients eligible for OAC and receiving a Watchman device, the most solid scientific evidence exists for warfarin plus aspirin for 45 days followed by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 months and a lifelong aspirin therapy. In real-world most patients are being treated with DAPT for 3-6 months. Alternatively, the Watchman was approved for 3 months of novel OAC (NOAC) therapy in conjunction with aspirin. For all other devices, DAPT for 1-6 months has been used in the vast majority of cases. Considering major bleeding as the predominant complication following LAAO, evidence suggests that short-term DAPT (6 weeks) or single antiplatelet therapy using aspirin may be a viable option.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This review aims to discuss the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo coronary stenting with emphasis on the use of double vs triple therapy.. When combined with systemic anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy results in an unacceptable increase in bleeding without any improvement in prevention of thrombotic events. Direct oral anticoagulants combined with single antiplatelet therapy have reduced bleeding compared with warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy. Triple anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants leads to an excess of bleeding and is not superior in preventing thrombotic events. Recent randomized, controlled trials have shown a significant reduction in major bleeding events in patients treated with dual antithrombotic therapy compared with triple therapy without any difference in efficacy. These findings call into question whether triple therapy should remain a part of standard practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a known complication of many cardiac procedures, including those undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) era, AF has been noted not only to be present in these patients but also associated with morbidity and mortality. In this article, we first outline the significance of AF in general and then more specifically in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We then compare and contrast specific clinical issues related to AF in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, traditionally with SAVR, but now increasingly more common with TAVR.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Stroke; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The introduction of NOACs has put a focus on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The number of patients in Stockholm diagnosed with non-valvular AF increased from 41 008 in 2011 to 51 266 in 2017 and their treatment has been markedly improved. Between 2011 and 2017 total oral anticoagulant treatment increased from 51.6% (warfarin) to 77.3% (31% warfarin, 46.3% NOACs) and aspirin decreased from 31.6% to 7.2%. Treatment was especially improved among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 and elderly high risk patients. We found an excellent persistence with OAC treatment (88% at 1 year and 83% at 2 years). A comparative effectiveness study showed that NOACs were at least as effective and safe as warfarin even among patients ≥80 years or with previous serious bleeds. After a gradual introduction of NOACs with many educational activities apixaban is now the first-line choice for stroke prevention in AF in Stockholm. Swedish guideline goals are fulfilled and outcomes are improved.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Sweden; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Dabigatran is a kind of oral anticoagulant and there was little review only about dabigatran and warfarin used in patients with atrial fibrillation. This meta-analysis only assesses the dabigatran and warfarin used in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Cochrane Library, PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke and the second endpoints were the incidence of bleeding and embolic events.. Six RCTs and 20086 patients were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference was obtained between 110 mg dabigatran and warfarin on the endpoint of stroke (risk ratio (RR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.12; P = .34; I = 0%) and embolic events p (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.12; P = .32; I = 0%). However, the 110 mg dabigatran associated lower incidence of bleeding (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .01; I = 0%) compare with warfarin. When compared with 150 mg dabigatran, warfarin associated with lower rate of stroke (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.83-1.12; P = .62; I = 0%) and embolic events (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86; P = .001; I = 0%) but similar in the incidence of bleeding (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86; P = .001; I = 0%).. No significant difference was obtained between 110 mg dabigatran and warfarin in the incidence of stroke and embolic events. However, the 110 mg dabigatran associated lower incidence of bleeding compare with warfarin. When compared with 150 mg dabigatran, warfarin associated with lower incidence of stroke and embolic events but similar in the incidence of bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In this review we present data on prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with nonvalvular AF and T2D combined with CKD have elevated risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic complications, as well as of all cause death. Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) depend on comorbidities and can be determined by the presence of T2D and/or diabetic nephropathy. Use of warfarin in CKD in some cases provides no preventive effect relative to risk of stroke and is characterized by increased risk of bleeding because of poor INR control, and possibly development of calcification of arteries. Presence of diabetic nephropathy requires monitoring of renal filtration function for correction of doses or selection of another anticoagulant. Lack of data from randomized controlled trials hampers choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with terminal CKD on hemodialysis or after renal transplantation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Humans; Prognosis; Stroke; Warfarin

Registries and non-interventional studies offer relevant and complementary information to clinical trials, since they have a high external validity. Areas covered: The information regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin, or rivaroxaban alone in clinical practice was reviewed in this manuscript. For this purpose, a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The MEDLINE and EMBASE search included both medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords including: atrial fibrillation (AF) OR warfarin OR clinical practice OR ROCKET AF AND rivaroxaban. Case reports were not considered. Expert commentary: In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of stroke, but, importantly, with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. A number of observational comparative and non-comparative studies, with more than 60,000 patients included treated with rivaroxaban, have analyzed the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients with AF in different clinical settings. These studies have shown that in clinical practice, rates of stroke and major bleeding were consistently lower than those reported in ROCKET AF, likely due to the lower thromboembolic and bleeding risk observed in these patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is more frequent in older patients, who have a higher risk of cardioembolic stroke and thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy is the standard of treatment for stroke prevention; however, under-prescription is still very common in older patients. The reasons underlying this phenomenon have not been systematically investigated, and true contraindications only partially account for it. An intimate skepticism on the real benefit-risk balance of oral anticoagulant therapy in the oldest patients seems to derive from the fact that most studies supporting it were conducted decades ago and included younger patients, with overall better functional and clinical status. In this review we will focus on the main barriers to anticoagulant therapy prescription in older patients and summarize the available evidences on the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in this population. The encouraging evidence of a higher net clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin should hopefully widen the treatment options also for frail individuals, thereby allowing a greater number of patients to be treated according to current international guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are administered in fixed doses without anticoagulant monitoring. Randomized trials show that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective as and safer than dose-adjusted warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses indicate that plasma drug levels or anticoagulant activity of the NOACs predict stroke and bleeding. This review examines the historical basis for anticoagulant monitoring, discusses methods to measure and interpret drug levels, and critically assesses the role of routine laboratory monitoring in the management of NOAC therapy.. The predictable anticoagulant response of NOACs has provided the pharmacological basis for their administration in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Although it is possible to accurately measure NOAC drug levels, within-patient variability complicates interpretation of these results. Furthermore, patient characteristics, such as age and renal function, confound the association between NOAC drug levels and clinical outcomes. Information is lacking on the optimal drug level in particular patient groups (eg, elderly, the renally impaired, and those with high bleeding risk), the appropriate dose adjustment to achieve expected levels, and whether routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment will improve clinical outcomes. A benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.. Robust evidence from patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to NOACs or warfarin demonstrates that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective and safe as monitored warfarin, with lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage and reduced mortality. Further research is required to determine whether routine laboratory monitoring might provide a net benefit for patients. Until such data are available, clinicians should continue to prescribe NOACs in fixed doses without routine monitoring.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Warfarin

Essentials Hemorrhagic risk of antiplatelet drugs is generally thought to be lower than anticoagulants. We systematically reviewed trials comparing antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in older patients. Overall, the risk of major bleeding was similar with antiplatelet and with anticoagulant drugs. In elderly patients, risks and benefits of antiplatelet drugs should be carefully weighted.. Background The hemorrhagic risk of antiplatelet drugs in older patients could be higher than is usually assumed. Objective To compare the bleeding risk of antiplatelet drugs and oral anticoagulants in elderly patients. Methods We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to January 2016 for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and parallel cohorts comparing antiplatelet drugs and oral anticoagulants in patients aged 65 years or older. Two independent authors assessed studies for inclusion. The pooled relative risk (RR) of major bleeding was estimated using a random model. Results Seven RCTs (4550 patients) and four cohort studies (38 649 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The risk of major bleeding when on aspirin or clopidogrel was equal to that when on warfarin in RCTs (RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.69-1.48; moderate-quality evidence), lower than when on warfarin in non-randomized cohort studies (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; low-quality evidence) and not different when all studies were combined (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01). Bleeding of any severity (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86) and intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73) were less frequent with antiplatelet drugs than with warfarin. All-cause mortality was similar (RR, 0.99). Subgroup analysis suggested that major bleeding might be higher with warfarin than with aspirin in patients over 80 years old. Conclusion Elderly patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel suffer less any-severity bleeding but have a risk of major bleeding similar to that of oral anticoagulants, with the exception of intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Age appropriateness of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is uncertain.. To review oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in older (age >65 years) people and to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability using the Fit-fOR-The-Aged (FORTA) classification.. We performed a structured comprehensive review of controlled clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics to assess study and total patient numbers, quality of major outcome data and data of geriatric relevance. The resulting evidence was discussed in a round table with an interdisciplinary panel of ten European experts. Decisions on age appropriateness were made using a Delphi process.. For the eight drugs included, 380 citations were identified. The primary outcome results were reported in 32 clinical trials with explicit and relevant data on older people. Though over 24,000 patients aged >75/80 years were studied for warfarin, data on geriatric syndromes were rare (two studies reporting on frailty/falls/mental status) and missing for all other compounds. Apixaban was rated FORTA-A (highly beneficial). Other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (including low/high-intensity dabigatran and high-intensity edoxaban) and warfarin were assigned to FORTA-B (beneficial). Phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol and fluindione were rated FORTA-C (questionable), mainly reflecting the absence of data.. All non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin were classified as beneficial or very beneficial in older persons (FORTA-A or -B), underlining the overall positive assessment of the risk/benefit ratio for these drugs. For other vitamin-K antagonists regionally used in Europe, the lack of evidence should challenge current practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Consensus; Dabigatran; Delphi Technique; Europe; Evidence-Based Practice; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To determine the role of warfarin (WF) prophylaxis in the prevention of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation and subsequent embolic complications following an anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion abnormalities.. The role of oral anticoagulation prophylaxis, in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), in the current era of percutaneous coronary intervention has not been well studied, despite being a class IIb recommendation in the AHA/ACC STEMI guidelines.. The Cochrane search strategy was used to search PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library for relevant results. Four studies, two retrospective, one prospective registry, and a randomized feasibility control trial met criteria for inclusion. Data was pooled using a random effects model and reported as odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Primary outcomes of interest were rate of stroke, major bleeding and mortality.. Pooled analysis included 526 patients in the No WF group and 347 patients in the WF group. No statistical difference in rate of stroke (OR: 2.72 [95% CI: 0.47-15.88; p=0.21]) or mortality (OR: 1.50 [95% CI 0.29-7.71; p=0.63]) was observed. Major bleeding was significantly higher in the WF group (OR: 2.56 [95% CI: 1.34-4.89; p=0.004]).. The routine use of DAPT and WF for prophylaxis against LVT formation following an anterior STEMI with associated decrease in LVEF and wall motion abnormalities, appears to result in no mortality benefit or reduction in stroke rates, but may increase the frequency of major bleeding.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction; Anticoagulants; Chi-Square Distribution; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Contraction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Warfarin; Young Adult

Renal impairment increases risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have varied dependence on renal elimination, magnifying the importance of appropriate patient selection, dosing, and periodic kidney function monitoring. In randomized controlled trials of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs were at least as effective and associated with less bleeding compared with warfarin. Each direct oral anticoagulant was associated with reduced risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding compared with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Renal function decrease appears less impacted by DOACs, which are associated with a better risk-benefit profile than warfarin in patients with decreasing renal function over time. Limited data address the risk-benefit profile of DOACs in patients with severe impairment or on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmaceutical Research; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); therefore, there is not equipoise when comparing newer oral anticoagulants with placebo in this setting.. To explore the effect of apixaban on mortality in patients with AF, we performed a meta-analysis of apixaban versus placebo using a putative placebo analysis based on randomized controlled clinical trials that compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic control. We used data from two prospective randomized controlled trials for our comparison of apixaban versus warfarin (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) and apixaban versus aspirin (Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Have Failed or Are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment). Using meta-analysis approaches, we indirectly compared apixaban with an imputed placebo with respect to the risk of death in patients with AF. We used results from meta-analyses of randomized trials as our reference for the comparison between warfarin and placebo/no treatment, and aspirin and placebo/no treatment.. In these meta-analyses, a lower rate of death was seen both with warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.97) and aspirin (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.07) versus placebo/no treatment. Using data from ARISTOTLE and AVERROES, apixaban reduced the risk of death by 34% (95% CI 12-50%; p = 0.004) and 33% (95% CI 6-52%; p = 0.02), respectively, when compared with an imputed placebo. The pooled reduction in all-cause death with apixaban compared with an imputed placebo was 34% (95% CI 18-47%; p = 0.0002).. In patients with AF, indirect comparisons suggest that apixaban reduces all-cause death by approximately one third compared with an imputed placebo.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Placebo Effect; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis are at a high risk of ischemic stroke. The role of warfarin in mitigating this risk in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis is uncertain. Our objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of warfarin in patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis.. We used MedLine, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished observational and interventional studies related to the use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis, and provided data on the risk of stroke and/or bleeding outcomes relative to placebo or no anticoagulation therapy. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes.. No randomized controlled trials met the criteria for inclusion. Fourteen observational studies (20,398 participants) were included in the analysis. The use of warfarin was not associated with ischemic stroke (14 studies; 20,398 participants; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07), intracranial hemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke; 4 studies; 15,726 participants; aHR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.93-4.00), gastrointestinal bleeding (3 studies; 14,693 participants; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.8-1.76), or all-cause mortality (7 studies; 16,172 participants; aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72-1.11).. Observational studies suggest that warfarin was not associated with a clear benefit or harm among patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis. These estimates were limited by study heterogeneity including the inability to account for a number of important confounders such as the time in the therapeutic range. Because of the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding complications in this population, well designed clinical trials of warfarin and other anticoagulants are urgently needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Global Health; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Warfarin

Thrombosis is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and anticoagulants are the mainstay of its prevention and treatment. Starting with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin, the choices of anticoagulants have exploded in the past 20 years. With over 90 % subcutaneous bioavailability, no need for coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment, and a lower risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, low-molecular-weight heparin and fondaparinux have replaced UFH for prevention and initial treatment of venous thromboembolism and for secondary prevention in cancer patients. In patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, bivalirudin is often used instead of UFH. Oral anticoagulation therapy has advanced with the introduction of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. With efficacy at least equal to that of VKAs but with greater safety and convenience, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for many indications. This paper a) highlights these advances, b) outlines how specific reversal agents for the NOACs will enhance their safety, c) reviews some of the ongoing trials with the NOACs, and d) describes the inhibitors of factor XII and XI that are under investigation as anticoagulants.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Discovery; Factor XI; Factor XII; Heart Failure; Heparin; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Stroke; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The introduction of new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed the clinical management of AF. To inform decision making around dabigatran by identifying factors influencing cost-effectiveness results, we undertook a systematic review of economic evaluations of dabigatran versus warfarin for the prevention of stroke in AF patients.. A systematic literature search of Ovid Medline and Embase, Wiley's Cochrane Library, HEED, PubMed databases and grey literature was carried out for primary economic evaluations comparing dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with AF. Data on study characteristics, model inputs and results, and sensitivity analyses were abstracted and synthesized qualitatively.. Twenty-three economic evaluations were identified and RE-LY was cited in 52% of studies as the source of the efficacy data. Twenty evaluations used Markov modelling, 2 performed discrete event simulation, and 1 was a trial-based evaluation. Eighty-two percent reported base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of less than $50,000 USD/QALY. Key variables, including international normalized ratio (INR) control, the cost of monitoring, risk of stroke and bleeding, and age were found to alter the conclusions in only a few studies. Less commonly explored factors included time horizon and cost of long-term care follow-up.. Several factors should be considered when interpreting the results of economic analyses which are based on randomized clinical trial evidence. Real-world data are needed to further assess the clinical and economic consequences of dabigatran relative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) depend on the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) with an international normalised ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0. This meta-analysis focused the relative efficacy and safety of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared with warfarin at different thresholds of centre's TTR (cTTR).. We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and websites of regulatory agencies, limiting searches to randomized phase 3 trials. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding. We used a random-effects model to pool effect on outcomes according to different thresholds of cTTR.. Four TTR sub-studies with a total of 71,222 patients were included. The benefit of NOAC in reducing SSE compared with warfarin was significantly higher in patients at cTTR<60% (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.90) and at 60% to <70% (0.82, 0.71-0.95) but not at ≥70% (1.00, 0.82-1.23) with a significant interaction for cTTR<70% or ≥70% (p=0.042). The risk of major or NMCR bleeding was significantly lower with NOAC as compared with warfarin in patients at all sub-groups (0.67, 0.54-0.83 for patients at cTTR<60% and 0.75, 0.63-0.89 at 60% to <70%) except for cTTR≥70% (HR 0.84, 0.64-1.11), but the interaction for cTTR<70% or ≥70% was not statistically significant (p=0.271).. The superiority in efficacy of NOAC compared with warfarin for stroke prevention is lost above a cTTR threshold of approximately 70%, but the relative safety appears to be less modified by the centre-based quality of INR control.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke, according to progressive decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <25 ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Evidence from the real-world setting complements evidence coming from randomized controlled trials. We aimed to summarize all available evidence from high-quality real-world observational studies about efficacy and safety of nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We searched PubMed and Web of Science until January 7, 2017 for observational nationwide or health insurance databases reporting matched or adjusted results comparing nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, any stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, major hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and death.. In 28 included studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with vitamin-K antagonists, all 3 nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants were associated with a large reduction of intracranial hemorrhage (apixaban hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.63; dabigatran HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.37-0.49; rivaroxaban HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86); similar rates of ischemic stroke and ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (apixaban HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19 and HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95-1.22 / dabigatran HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16 and HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.50 / rivaroxaban HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.04, respectively); apixaban and dabigatran with lower mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75, respectively); apixaban with fewer gastrointestinal (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95) and major hemorrhages (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.63); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with more gastrointestinal hemorrhages (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36 and HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.41, respectively); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with similar rate of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.21 and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89, respectively).. This meta-analysis confirms the main findings of the randomized controlled trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the real-world setting and, hence, strengthens their validity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The original non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) trials in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) enrolled patients with native valve pathologies. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of NOACs versus warfarin in AF patients with native valvular heart disease (VHD).. Trials were identified by exhaustive literature search. Trial data were combined using inverse variance weighting to produce a meta-analytic summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin. Our final analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 71 526 participants, including 13 574 with VHD. Pooling results from included trials showed that NOACs versus warfarin reduced stroke or systemic embolism (HR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.92) in AF patients with VHD. However, risk reduction of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage was driven by apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran (HR for major bleeding: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.91]; HR for intracranial hemorrhage: 0.33 [95% CI, 0.25-0.45]) but not rivaroxaban (HR for major bleeding: 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]; HR for intracranial hemorrhage: 1.27 [95% CI, 0.77-2.10]).. Among patients with AF and native VHD, NOACs reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared with warfarin. Evidence shows that apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban also reduce bleeding in this patient subgroup, whereas major bleeding (but not intracranial hemorrhage or mortality rate) is significantly increased in VHD patients treated with rivaroxaban. NOACs are a reasonable alternative to warfarin in AF patients with VHD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Background In a previous systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke or transient ischemic attack. Since then, new information became available. Aim The aim of the present work was to update the results of the previous systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed until 24 August 2016 for randomized controlled trials using the following search items: "atrial fibrillation" and "anticoagulation" and "warfarin" and "previous stroke or transient ischemic attack." Eligible studies had to be phase III trials in patients with atrial fibrillation comparing warfarin with nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants currently on the market or with the intention to be brought to the market in North America or Europe. The outcomes assessed in the efficacy analysis included stroke or systemic embolism, stroke, ischemic or unknown stroke, disabling or fatal stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, cardiovascular death, death from any cause, and myocardial infarction. The outcomes assessed in the safety analysis included major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and major gastrointestinal bleeding. We performed fixed effects analyses on intention-to-treat basis. Results Among 183 potentially eligible articles, four were included in the meta-analysis. In 20,500 patients, compared to warfarin, nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with a significant reduction of stroke/systemic embolism (relative risk reduction: 13.7%, absolute risk reduction: 0.78%, number needed to treat to prevent one event: 127), hemorrhagic stroke (relative risk reduction: 50.0%, absolute risk reduction: 0.63%, number needed to treat: 157), any stroke (relative risk reduction: 13.1%, absolute risk reduction: 0.7%, number needed to treat: 142), and intracranial hemorrhage (relative risk reduction: 46.1%, absolute risk reduction: 0.88%, number needed to treat: 113) over 1.8-2.8 years. Conclusions This updated meta-analysis in 20,500 atrial fibrillation patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack shows that compared to warfarin non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants are associated with a significant reduction of stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, and intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a common arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin and the DOACs dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban. The primary focus is on primary evidence from clinical trials, indirect comparison studies and real-world studies. While there are gaps in the literature, the evidence thus far indicates that rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin and similar to dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, although rivaroxaban may be associated with an elevated bleeding risk compared with other DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Epidemiologic Methods; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are available for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF): dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor); and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (factor Xa inhibitors). This article summarizes the safety and efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of stroke in elderly NVAF patients.. PubMed was searched to identify published results of randomized, controlled trials evaluating DOACs for stroke prevention in elderly NVAF patients. Pharmacologic and dose recommendations were obtained from the package inserts.. DOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with NVAF. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage, while some DOACs demonstrated an increase in other bleeding events (e.g., gastrointestinal). The faster onset and offset of action and fewer food and drug interactions of DOACs may be an advantage over warfarin for some patients.. DOACs are an alternative to warfarin with overall equivalent safety and efficacy in elderly patients with NVAF, and may be preferable for some. Stroke risk must always be balanced against potential bleeding risk when determining an optimal anticoagulation treatment plan. Patients' needs and preferences will also impact this decision.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving warfarin therapy, the target international normalized ratio range of 2.0 to 3.0 is recommended by Western countries. However, this treatment carries a higher risk of bleeding which suggests more researches on whether low-intensity warfarin therapy (range <2.0 to 3.0) is suitable for East Asian patients. Three databases were searched from inception to April 21, 2016. Studies that reported thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events in low- and standard-intensity warfarin groups were included. Finally, seven studies were included in the analysis. There was a significantly decreased risk of hemorrhagic events (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.82, p = 0.002) with no statistically increased risk of thromboembolic events (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.62, p = 0.47) in the 1.5 to 2.0 group compared with that of the 2.0 to 3.0 group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference of cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.83, p = 0.12) between the 2 groups. Further analysis showed there was no significance in thromboembolic events (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.60, p = 0.40), major bleeding events (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09, p = 0.13), and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.65, p = 0.23) between 1.5 to 2.5 and 2.0 to 3.0 groups. Although no significant difference was found in hemorrhagic events (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.01, p = 0.06), there was a decreased trend in it. In conclusion, low-intensity warfarin therapy can achieve reduced hemorrhage without increasing thromboembolism for East Asian patients with NVAF receiving warfarin therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both) and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2017), CENTRAL (last search February 2017), MEDLINE (from 1948 to February 2017), Embase (from 1980 to February 2017), and several ongoing trials registers. We also checked the reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and we contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people diagnosed with APS according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion or by consulting a third review author and, in addition, one review author checked all the extracted data.. We included five studies involving 419 randomized participants with APS. Only one study was at low risk of bias in all domains. One study was at low risk of bias in all domains for objective outcomes but not for quality of life (measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire). We judged the other three studies to be at unclear or high risk of bias in three or more domains.The duration of intervention ranged from 180 days to a mean of 3.9 years. One study compared rivaroxaban (a novel oral anticoagulant: NOAC) with standard warfarin treatment and reported no thrombotic or major bleeding events, but it was not powered to detect such differences (low-quality evidence). Investigators reported similar rates of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (risk ratio (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 8.33; moderate-quality evidence) and minor bleeding (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.83) for participants receiving rivaroxaban and the standard vitamin K antagonists (VKA). This study also reported some small benefit with rivaroxaban over the standard VKA treatment in terms of quality of life health state measured at 180 days with the EQ-5D-5L 100 mm visual analogue scale (mean difference (MD) 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-quality evidence) but not measured as health utility (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10 [on a scale from 0 to 1]).Two studies compared high dose VKA (warfarin) with moderate/standard intensity VKA and found no differences in the rates of any thrombotic events (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23) or major bleeding (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.25) between the groups (low-quality evidence). Minor bleeding analyzed using the RR and any bleeding using the hazard ratio (HR) were more frequent in participants receiving high-intensity warfarin treatment compared to the standard-intensity therapy (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07; and HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-quality evidence).In one study, it was not possible to estimate the RR for stroke with a combination of VKA plus antiplatelet agent compared to a single antiplatelet agent, while for major bleeding, a single event occurred in the single antiplatelet agent group. In one study, comparing combined VKA plus antiplatelet agent with dual antiplatelet therapy, the RR of the risk of stroke over three years of observation was 5.00 (95% CI 0.26 to 98.0). In a single small study, the RR for stroke during one year of observation with a dual antiplatelet therapy compared to single antiplatelet drug was 0.14 (95% CI 0.01. There is not enough evidence for or against NOACs or for high-intensity VKA compared to the standard VKA therapy in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS. There is some evidence of harm for high-intensity VKA regarding minor and any bleeding. The evidence was also not sufficient to show benefit or harm for VKA plus antiplatelet agent or dual antiplatelet therapy compared to a single antiplatelet drug. Future studies should be adequately powered, with proper adherence to treatment, in order to evaluate the effects of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or both, for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS. We have identified five ongoing trials mainly using NOACs in APS, so increasing experimental efforts are likely to yield additional evidence of clinical relevance in the near future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is more prevalent among CKD patients than the general population. AF causes stroke or systemic embolism, leading to increased mortality. The conventional antithrombotic prophylaxis agent warfarin is often prescribed for the prevention of stroke, but risk of bleeding necessitates regular therapeutic monitoring. Recently developed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are expected to be useful as alternatives to warfarin.. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin among AF patients with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 1 August 2017) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors) with dose-adjusted warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in non-valvular AF patients with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) or eGFR between 15 and 60 mL/min (CKD stage G3 and G4).. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between anticoagulant therapy and all strokes and systemic embolic events as the primary efficacy outcome and major bleeding events as the primary safety outcome. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE.. Our review included 12,545 AF participants with CKD from five studies. All participants were randomised to either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or dose-adjusted warfarin. Four studies used a central, interactive, automated response system for allocation concealment while the other did not specify concealment methods. Four studies were blinded while the other was partially open-label. However, given that all studies involved blinded evaluation of outcome events, we considered the risk of bias to be low. We were unable to create funnel plots due to the small number of studies, thwarting assessment of publication bias. Study duration ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 years. The large majority of participants included in this study were CKD stage G3 (12,155), and a small number were stage G4 (390). Of 12,545 participants from five studies, a total of 321 cases (2.56%) of the primary efficacy outcome occurred per year. Further, of 12,521 participants from five studies, a total of 617 cases (4.93%) of the primary safety outcome occurred per year. DOAC appeared to probably reduce the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism events (5 studies, 12,545 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence) and to slightly reduce the incidence of major bleeding events (5 studies, 12,521 participants: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; low certainty evidence) in comparison with warfarin.. Our findings indicate that DOAC are as likely as warfarin to prevent all strokes and systemic embolic events without increasing risk of major bleeding events among AF patients with kidney impairment. These findings should encourage physicians to prescribe DOAC in AF patients with CKD without fear of bleeding. The major limitation is that the results of this study chiefly reflect CKD stage G3. Application of the results to CKD stage G4 patients requires additional investigation. Furthermore, we could not assess CKD stage G5 patients. Future reviews should assess participants at more advanced CKD stages. Additionally, we could not conduct detailed analyses of subgroups and sensitivity analyses due to lack of data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

\\Anticoagulation is used for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, amongst other by use of the vitamin K antagonist, warfarin. Quality in warfarin therapy is often summarized by the time patients spend within the therapeutic range (percent time in therapeutic range, TTR). The correlation between TTR and the occurrence of complications during warfarin therapy has been established, but the influence of patient characteristics in that respect remains undetermined. The objective of the present papers was to examine the association between mean TTR and complication rates with adjustment for differences in relevant patient cohort characteristics.. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase (2005-2015) to identify eligible studies reporting on use of warfarin therapy by patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and the occurrence of hemorrhage and thromboembolism. Both randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies were included. The association between the reported mean TTR and major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism was analyzed by random-effects meta-regression with and without adjustment for relevant clinical cohort characteristics. In the adjusted meta-regressions, the impact of mean TTR on the occurrence of hemorrhage was adjusted for the mean age and the proportion of populations with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. In the adjusted analyses on thromboembolism, the proportion of females was, furthermore, included.. Of 2169 papers, 35 papers met pre-specified inclusion criteria, holding relevant information on 31 patient cohorts. In univariable meta-regression, increasing mean TTR was significantly associated with a decreased rate of both major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism. However, after adjustment mean TTR was no longer significantly associated with stroke/systemic embolism. The proportion of residual variance composed by between-study heterogeneity was substantial for all analyses.. Although higher mean TTR in warfarin therapy was associated with lower complication rates in atrial fibrillation, the strength of the association was decreased when adjusting for differences in relevant clinical characteristics of the patient cohorts. This study suggests that mainly the safety of warfarin therapy increases with higher mean TTR, whereas effectiveness appears not to be substantially improved. Due to the limitations immanent in the meta-regression methods, the results of the present study should be interpreted with caution. Further research on the association between the quality of warfarin therapy and risk of complications is warranted with adjustment for clinically relevant characteristics.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Regression Analysis; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Currently, little evidence is available on the length and type of anticoagulation used for extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed initial oral anticoagulation therapy.. To compare the efficacy and safety of available oral therapeutic options (aspirin, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) for extended thromboprophylaxis in adults with a first unprovoked VTE, to prevent VTE recurrence after completion of an acceptable initial oral anticoagulant treatment period, as defined in individual studies.. For this review, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (March 2017) as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2). We also searched trials registries (March 2017) and reference lists of relevant articles.. We included randomised controlled trials in which patients with a first, symptomatic, objectively confirmed, unprovoked VTE, who had been initially treated with anticoagulants, were randomised to extended prophylaxis (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents, or DOACs) versus no prophylaxis or placebo. We also included trials that compared one type of extended prophylaxis versus another type of extended prophylaxis.. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by discussion.. Six studies with a combined total of 3436 participants met the inclusion criteria. Five studies compared extended prophylaxis versus placebo: three compared warfarin versus placebo, and two compared aspirin versus placebo. One study compared one type of extended prophylaxis (rivaroxaban) versus another type of extended prophylaxis (aspirin). For extended prophylaxis versus placebo, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality to moderate owing to concerns arising from risks of selection and performance bias in individual studies. For all other outcomes in this review, we downgraded the quality of the evidence to low owing to concerns arising from risk of bias for the studies stated above, combined with concerns over imprecision. For extended prophylaxis versus other extended prophylaxis, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and major bleeding to moderate owing to concerns over imprecision. Risk of bias in the individual study was low.Meta-analysis showed that extended prophylaxis was no more effective than placebo in preventing VTE-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 6.98; 1862 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.98; low-quality evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.03; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.07; moderate-quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.85; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.86; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.99; moderate-quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 5.33; 1672 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.30; low-quality evidence), stroke (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.46; 1224 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.80; low-quality evidence), or myocardial infarction (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.87; 1495 participants; 3 studies; P = 1.00; low-quality evidence).One study showed that the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban was associated with fewer recurrent VTEs than aspirin (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.54; 1389 participants; P = 0.0001; moderate-quality evidence). Data show no clear differences in the incidence of major bleeding between rivaroxaban and aspirin (OR 3.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 25.51; 1389 participants; P = 0.30; moderate-quality evidence) nor in the incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.94; 1389 participants; 1 study; P = 0.69; moderate-quality evidenc. Evidence is currently insufficient to permit definitive conclusions concerning the effectiveness and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis in prevention of recurrent VTE after initial oral anticoagulation therapy among participants with unprovoked VTE. Additional good-quality large-scale randomised controlled trials are required before firm conclusions can be reached.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Despite the information provided by clinical trials is important, there are relevant clinical differences between those patients included in clinical trials and data of daily outpatient clinics. As a result, in some cases, the results of randomized clinical trials could not be directly applied to clinical practice. In this context, to perform «real-life» registries is mandatory. In the ROCKET-AF study, rivaroxaban, a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant, was at least as effective as warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with similar rates of major bleeding, but with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. In the last years, different large registries have confirmed that rivaroxaban is effective and even safer in real-life patients than in ROCKET-AF. The aim of this review is to update the current evidence about the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether the combination of high-/low-dose of aspirin and various intensities of warfarin (W) offer greater benefit than aspirin (ASA) alone. A total of 14 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) having 26,916 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) met inclusion criteria. The efficacy and safety of all outcomes which included myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, stroke, and bleeding were calculated. The overall outcomes analysis showed there was no significant difference in the risk of MI (relative ratio [RR] 0.959, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.04, P = 0.308), stroke (RR 0.789, 95 % CI 0.57-1.09, P = 0.145), and all-cause death (RR 1.007, 95 % CI 0.93-1.09, P = 0.87) between the combination group and ASA group. The subgroup analysis suggested that ASA (≤100 mg/day) plus W (mean international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0-3.0) decreased the risk rate of stroke (RR 0.660, 95 % CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003). There was a lower risk of MI (RR 0.605, 95 % CI 0.47-0.77, P < 0.0001) as well as stroke (RR 0.594, 95 % CI 0.45-0.79, P < 0.0001) between W (INR 2.0-3.0) combined with ASA (mean dose ≥100 mg/day) and ASA. However, the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.738, 95 % CI 1.45-2.08, P < 0.0001) and minor bleeding (RR 2.767, 95 % CI 2.12-3.61, P < 0.0001) was almost doubled in the combined groups. Compared with ASA, high-dose aspirin with moderate-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) may better reduce the risk of MI and stroke but confer an increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Causality; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Young Adult

The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. No randomized trials are available and observational studies have yielded conflicting results, engendering a large clinical practice variability and physician uncertainty. An unresolved but highly relevant question is whether AF poses a true risk of ischemic stroke in hemodialysis and whether any form of oral anticoagulation is therefore warranted.. We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared the incidence of ischemic stroke and bleeding in hemodialysis patients with AF taking VKA and those not taking VKA. When hemodialysis patients had been pooled with peritoneal dialysis, kidney transplant, or stage V chronic kidney disease patients, unpublished outcome data of the hemodialysis subgroup were obtained through personal communication. The main outcome measures were ischemic stroke/thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.. Twelve prospective or retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 17,380 hemodialysis patients of whom 4,010 (23.1%) received VKA. In VKA-treated patients, mean CHADS. Our meta-analysis revealed a trend for a reduction of the risk of ischemic stroke in hemodialysis patients with AF treated with VKA. The true protective effect may have been underestimated, owing to inclusion of low-risk patients not expected to benefit from anticoagulation and to suboptimal anticoagulation. However, assessment of the overall effect of VKA in hemodialysis patients should also take into account the increased risk of bleeding, in particular of hemorrhagic stroke. Whether new oral anticoagulants provide a better benefit-risk ratio in hemodialysis patients should be the subject of future trials.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Mortality; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased risk for stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. However, the majority of studies that have analyzed the efficacy of anticoagulants have been focused only on their effects on the risk of stroke. Areas covered: The available evidence about the association between atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular disease as well as the effects of oral anticoagulation on cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, with a particular focus on direct oral anticoagulants, was updated in this review. Expert opinion: The management of patients with atrial fibrillation should not be limited to the prevention of stroke, but should also include the prevention of cardiovascular events. Despite treatment with vitamin K antagonists, many patients with atrial fibrillation still develop cardiovascular complications, particularly individuals whose anticoagulation is difficult to control. Direct oral anticoagulants overcome the majority of limitations of vitamin K antagonists and compared with warfarin, they lead to a greater reduction in the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and intracranial hemorrhage. Although these drugs can only be compared indirectly, it seems that not all direct oral anticoagulants are equal with regard to the prevention of myocardial infarction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Embolism; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ranks the most prevailing type of cardiac rhythm disorder and AF patients are associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke compared to others. This study is designed to assess the relative efficacy of several clinical events prevention anticoagulants in patients with AF. Conventional pairwise meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effect model initially, then network meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model within results illustrated by cumulative odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The rank probabilities of each treatment outcomes were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We conducted a systematic review and collected key clinical data from 37 studies with respect to 5 anticoagulant treatments for AF. Patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a reduced risk of stroke compared to those treated with warfarin (OR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.53 to 0.88; OR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 to 0.91). Rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.712) appears to be the most preferable one with respect to vascular events, and both apixaban (SUCRA = 0.720) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.678) are preferable to others with respect to stroke. Dabigatran outperforms others with respect to the outcome of mortality (SUCRA = 0.695), hemorrhage events (SUCRA = 0.747), and myocardial infarction (SUCRA = 0.620). In conclusion, dabigatran has a noticeable and comprehensive advantage compared to others with respect to preventing several complications including hemorrhage events, myocardial infarction, and mortality. In addition, apixaban may be the best choice of preventing stroke, and rivaroxaban is more preferable to others with respect to preventing vascular events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs warfarin according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status are not completely characterized. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify whether in these patients the strategy of oral anticoagulation should be tailored to diabetes status. In this study-level meta-analysis, we included 4 randomized phase III trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF; a total of 18 134 patients with DM and 40 454 without DM were overall considered. Incidence of the following outcome measures was evaluated during the follow-up: stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and vascular death. Use of NOACs compared with warfarin reduced stroke/systemic embolism in diabetic (Risk Ratios [RR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P = .004) and nondiabetic patients (RR 0.83, 0.73-0.93; P = .001) (P for interaction .72). No interaction between diabetes status and benefits of NOACs was found for the occurrence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or intracranial bleeding (P for interaction >.05 for each comparison). Reduction of vascular death rates with NOACs was significant in diabetic patients (4.97% vs 5.99% with warfarin; RR 0.83, 0.72-0.96; P = .01), in whom absolute the reduction of this outcome measure was higher than in nondiabetics (1.02% vs 0.27%), although no interaction was present (P = .23). Results of this meta-analysis support the safety and efficacy of NOACs compared with warfarin in diabetic patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of edoxaban for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are reviewed.. Although warfarin has been an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF and VTE, the need for agents with less monitoring requirements, fewer food and drug interactions, and a lower risk of major bleeding led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Current DOACs work by either directly blocking thrombin (dabigatran) or inhibiting factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Edoxaban is the newest DOAC and only the second Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulant for once-daily administration. Unlike apixaban and rivaroxaban, edoxaban does not interact with the cytochrome P-450 system. The results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai-VTE trials demonstrated edoxaban's noninferiority to warfarin. However, the adverse-effect profile of edoxaban may limit the drug's use in clinical practice; in clinical trials, patients with AF who had a creatinine clearance of ≥95 mL/min had a higher rate of strokes with the use of edoxaban versus warfarin.. A review of the literature showed that edoxaban, the most recently approved DOAC, is noninferior to warfarin for management of VTE (after parenteral anticoagulant therapy) and for stroke risk reduction in many patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonists (NOAC) are an integral component of our antithrombotic prevention and therapy. For four of the NOAC, their non-inferiority or even superiority versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been proven. Thus, the management of special patient cohorts or the management of active bleeding complications is a focus of current discussion.In addition to prospective trials, numerous retrospective analyses of health insurers or public health provider data have been analyzed and published as "real life" or "real-world evidence" data. In almost all data sets the results of the NOAC approval trials were confirmed, demonstrating their non-inferiority or even superiority versus VKA. Attempts to compare the various NOAC with each other must be viewed critically since the real-world evidence (RWE) analysis provides very divergent results depending on the cohorts analyzed. Thus, a substantial prescriber-bias must be taken into account and never be excluded.In order to improve the management of bleeding complications, NOAC antidotes were developed. While the factors Xa antidote, andexanet alpha, a modified coagulation factor deleted of an intrinsic activity, will not be available before 2018, the dabigatran antidote idarucizumab is already in clinical use. Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment directed against dabigatran, is able to completely antagonize the effect of dabigatran within minutes. Therefore, the drug has the potential to terminate life-threatening bleeding complications earlier and make emergency surgical or interventional procedures possible without an elevated bleeding risk.

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation through meta-analyzing observational studies.. Seventeen studies were included after searching in PubMed for studies reporting the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (n=3), rivaroxaban versus Warfarin (n=11), or both (n=3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.. Overall, the risks of stroke/systematic thromboembolism with rivaroxaban were similar when compared with those with dabigatran (stroke/thromboembolism: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.13; I. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rivaroxaban was as effective as dabigatran, but was more effective than warfarin for the prevention of stroke/thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran, as was all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding. Rivaroxaban was comparable to warfarin for major bleeding, with an increased risk in gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Intracranial Thrombosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, with an estimated prevalence of 1-2% in North America and Europe. The increased prevalence of AF in Latin America is associated with an ageing general population, along with poor control of key risk factors, including hypertension. As a result, stroke prevalence and associated mortality have increased dramatically in the region. Therefore, the need for effective anticoagulation strategies in Latin America is clear. The aim of this review is to provide a contemporary overview of anticoagulants for stroke prevention. The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, eg, warfarin) and aspirin in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF in Latin America remains common, although around one fifth of all AF patients receive no anticoagulation. Warfarin use is complicated by a lack of access to effective monitoring services coupled with an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile. The overuse of aspirin is associated with significant bleeding risks and reduced efficacy for stroke prevention in this patient group. The non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACbs) represent a potential means of overcoming many limitations associated with VKA and aspirin use, including a reduction in the need for monitoring and a reduced risk of hemorrhagic events. The ultimate decision of which anticoagulant drug to utilize in AF patients depends on a multitude of factors. More research is needed to appreciate the impact of these factors in the Latin American population and thereby reduce the burden of AF-associated stroke in this region.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Latin America; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

To compare the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy (TT, dual antiplatelet plus warfarin) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) or PCI with stenting (PCI-S) who also require chronic oral anticoagulation.. Recommendations for the optimal antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment regimen for patients undergoing PCI-S or MI who also require oral anticoagulation are largely based on evidence from observational studies and expert opinions.. A systematic search was performed for studies comparing TT vs. DAPT in patients post PCI-S or MI and requiring chronic anticoagulation. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, MI, and stent thrombosis. Pooled relative risks (RR) were calculated using random effects model.. A total of 17 studies were included, with 14,921 patients [TT: 5,819(39%) and DAPT: 9,102(61%)] and a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. The majority of patients required oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. Compared to DAPT, patients treated with TT had no significant difference in all-cause mortality [RR: 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-1.08, P = 0.15], MI [RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51-1.06, P = 0.10], and stent thrombosis [RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.30, P = 0.24]. Patients treated with TT had significantly increased risk of major bleeding [RR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.39, P = 0.02], whereas the risk for ischemic stroke was significantly lower [RR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.92, P = 0.02].. All-cause mortality appears similar in patients treated with TT or DAPT although TT was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and a lower risk for ischemic stroke. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chi-Square Distribution; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Observational Studies as Topic; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) can be problematic because of increased bleeding risk. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that evaluated the use of warfarin in patients with AF and CKD to evaluate the risks of ischemic stroke/thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality.. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases were electronically searched through January 12, 2015. Additionally, a manual search was performed for relevant references. Random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. CKD was divided into non-end-stage CKD and end-stage CKD (on renal replacement therapy) and separate analyses were performed.. Thirteen publications from 11 cohorts (six retrospective and five prospective) including >48,500 total patients with >11,600 warfarin users were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with AF and non-end-stage CKD, warfarin resulted in a lower risk of ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89; P = .004) and mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59-0.72; P < .00001), but had no effect on major bleeding (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88-1.49; P = .31). In patients with AF and end-stage CKD, warfarin had no effect on the risks of stroke (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.69-1.82; P = .65) and mortality (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.13; P = .60), but increased the risks of major bleeding (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.56; P = .005).. Based on this meta-analysis, the use of warfarin for AF may have an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio in patients with end-stage CKD but not in those with non-end-stage CKD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Mortality; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Renal Replacement Therapy; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for stroke prevention in many patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is the newest entrant in this class. Results of the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE AF) study demonstrate that edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events, and is associated with significantly less major bleeding, including intracranial bleeding, and reduced cardiovascular mortality. With a net clinical benefit over warfarin, edoxaban is well positioned as a choice among the NOACs, which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. But how will clinicians choose amongst them? The purpose of this paper is to (a) place the ENGAGE AF trial results into context with results of the studies with the other NOACs, and (b) aid clinicians in selection of the right anticoagulant for the right atrial fibrillation patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are becoming more common in clinical practice for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The availability of several agents with similar efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in NVAF patients offers more selection, but at the same time requires certain knowledge to make a good choice. This comparative analysis provides an appraisal of the respective clinical trials and highlights much of what remains unknown about four FDA-approved agents: dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. It details how the DOACs compare to warfarin and to one another summarizes pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic properties, and drug interactions from the stand point of practical consequences of these findings. Common misconceptions and reservations are addressed. The practical application of this data is intended to help choosing the most appropriate agent for individual NVAF patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; beta-Alanine; Clinical Decision-Making; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. Guidelines recommend anticoagulation for patients with intermediate and high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2). Underuse of anticoagulants among eligible patients remains a persistent problem. Evidence demonstrates that the psychology of the fear of causing harm (omission bias) results in physicians' hesitancy to initiate anticoagulation and an inaccurate estimation of stroke risk. The American Heart Association (AHA) initiated the Get With The Guidelines-AFIB (GWTG-AFIB) module in June 2013 to enhance guideline adherence for treatment and management of AF. Better quality of care for AF patients can be provided by increasing adherence to anticoagulation guidelines and improving patient compliance with anticoagulation therapy through education and established protocols. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants may facilitate better patient adherence due to ease of administration and reduced monitoring burden. In this review, we discuss the reasons for underuse, omission bias contributing to underuse, and different strategies to address this issue.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk; Stroke; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are safe and effective for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism (S/SE) in atrial fibrillation. The efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin has not been systematically assessed in subjects with mild or moderate renal dysfunction. We performed a meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials that compared efficacy and safety (major bleeding) outcomes of NOACs compared to warfarin for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and had available data on renal function. We estimated the pooled relative risk (RR) of S/SE and major bleeding in relation to renal function (assessed by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate divided in 3 groups: normal [estimated glomerular filtration rate >80 ml/min], mildly impaired [50 to 80 ml/min], and moderate impairment [<50 ml/min]). We included 4 randomized clinical trials enrolling a total of 58,338 subjects. The RRs of S/SE and major bleeding were higher in subjects with renal impairment compared to normal renal function, independent of type of anticoagulant therapy. In subjects with normal renal function, no difference in the risk of S/SE was observed, whereas the risk of major bleeding was slightly lower for subjects taking NOACs (RR 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.99). In subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, NOACs were associated with a reduced risk of S/SE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85 and RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94, respectively) and major bleeding (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95 and RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.91, respectively) compared to warfarin. The pooled analysis for major bleeding demonstrated significant heterogeneity. In conclusion, the use of NOACs was associated with a reduced risk of S/SE and reduced risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment suggesting a favorable risk profile of these agents in patients with renal disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Benefits and/or harms (including costs) of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin therapy need appreciation in relative and absolute terms.. Accordingly, we derived clinically relevant relative and absolute benefit/harm parameters for NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) compared to warfarin from four clinical trials involving atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. For each trial, we tabulated patient numbers enduring four important outcomes and calculated unadjusted relative risk reduction (RRR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/year values (and 95% confidence intervals) for the NAOC compared to warfarin. These outcomes were as follows: stroke/systemic embolism (primary endpoint), hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeds, and death. We also addressed drug acquisition costs.. Each NOAC was noninferior to warfarin for primary-outcome prevention; RRRs were 12-33% and NNT/year values were 182-481, and all but one indicated statistically significant superiority. All the NOACs yielded statistically significant reductions in hemorrhagic stroke risk; RRRs were 42-74% and NNT/year values were 364-528. Major bleeding risk was comparable in both groups. Apixaban yielded a lower NNT/year for preventing death than for primary-outcome prevention. Compared to warfarin, NOAC acquisition costs were 70- to 140-fold greater.. For the primary outcome, the absolute benefits of NOACs were modest (NNT/year values being large). Reduced hemorrhagic stroke rates with NOACs could be due to superior embolic infarct prevention and fewer consequential hemorrhagic transformations. Among apixaban recipients, the absolute mortality benefit exceeded that for the primary outcome, indicating prevention of additional unrelated deaths. The substantially greater NOAC acquisition costs need viewing against probable greater safety and the avoidance of monitoring bleeding risks.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is increasingly used in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the absence of large controlled trials, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature appears to be the best way to obtain reliable evidence on rare peri-procedural outcomes such as thromboembolic or bleeding events. We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of currently available data on safety and efficacy of peri-procedural rivaroxaban in patients undergoing AF ablation. We performed a systematic search of the English language literature for studies comparing peri-procedural rivaroxaban therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and reporting detailed data on bleeding and/or thromboembolic complications. The Peto odds ratio (POR) was used to pool data into a fixed-effect meta-analysis. A total of 7400 patients undergoing catheter ablation were included in 15 observational and 1 randomized studies of which 1994 were receiving rivaroxaban and 5406 VKA. The risk of thromboembolism trended to be lower in the rivaroxaban group [4/1954 vs. 19/5219, POR 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.01, P = 0.052]. Major bleeding events occurred in 23 of 1994 cases (1.15%) in the rivaroxaban and 90 of 5406 (1.66%) in the VKA group (POR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.46-1.21, P = 0.23). A total of 87 minor bleeding events were reported in 1753 patients (4.96%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 165 of 4009 patients (4.12%) in the VKA group (POR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11, p = 0.22). In patients undergoing AF ablation, rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Anticoagulation in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is of paramount importance for prevention of thromboembolic events, and recent studies favor uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to uninterrupted VKAs for anticoagulation in CA by performing a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies comparing NOACs with uninterrupted VKAs in patients who underwent CA for AF from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2015. Odds ratio (OR) and Peto's OR (POR) were used to report for event rates >1% and <1%, respectively. A total of 11,686 patients with AF who underwent CA in 25 studies were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference between NOACs and uninterrupted VKAs in occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attacks (POR 1.35, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.94) and major bleeding (POR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.31), which were consistent in subgroup analysis of interrupted and uninterrupted NOACs. A lower risk of minor bleeding was observed with NOACs (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00), and no major differences were observed for the risk of thromboembolic events, cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion requiring drainage, and groin hematoma. NOACs, whether interrupted preprocedure or not, were associated with equal rates of stroke or TIA and major bleeding complications and less risk of minor bleeding compared with uninterrupted VKAs in CA for AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Trial data for the benefits and risks of dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are lacking. We sought to review real-world observational evidence for the comparative effectiveness and safety of these agents.. A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted from first available date to March 10, 2015 for longitudinal, observational studies comparing dabigatran with warfarin. Two reviewers evaluated studies for eligibility and extracted hazard ratios for ischemic stroke and gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding. hazard ratios were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Metaregression was performed to assess treatment-effect heterogeneity. We identified 232 unique citations. Seven retrospective cohort studies met study eligibility criteria, with 348 750 patients and a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. In pooled analyses, dabigatran-150 mg was not superior to warfarin in preventing stroke (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.01; P=0.066), but had a significantly lower hazard of intracranial bleeding (0.44; 0.34-0.59; P<0.001). Dabigatran-150 mg had a significantly greater hazard of gastrointestinal bleeding than warfarin (1.23; 1.01-1.50; P=0.041), which was potentiated in studies of older (elderly) versus younger populations (median/mean age, ≥75 versus <75 years; β=1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.14; P=0.020).. In real-world clinical practice, dabigatran is comparable with warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, dabigatran is associated with a lower risk for intracranial bleeding relative to warfarin, but-particularly among the elderly-a greater risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Bleeding outcomes from observational studies are consistent with those from the pivotal Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy trial.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are disorders with increasing prevalence. The presence of CKD increases the risk of incident AF and vice versa, and the presence of AF may accelerate CKD progression. Nearly a third of patients with established CKD also have AF, whilst half of AF patients may have some degree of renal dysfunction. Both AF and CKD are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, including significantly increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), either with vitamin K antagonists or with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is essential to optimise prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in AF patients with one or more stroke risk factors, and NOACs are more convenient and generally safer than vitamin K antagonists mostly due to consistently reduced risk of intracranial bleeding. The use of OAC must be balanced against the risk of OAC-related bleeding, which depends on the presence of bleeding risk factors. Renal failure is a well-established bleeding risk factor and renal function should be routinely assessed in all patients presenting with AF. Since the risk of bleeding increases in parallel with CKD severity, the clinical decision to use OAC in AF patients with severe CKD may be challenging. In this review article we summarize the OAC agents currently used in clinical practice and discuss the role of NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with AF and CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation.. In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic.. Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice.. Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Medication Errors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In spite of the substantial burden of atrial fibrillation and associated elevated ischemic stroke risk in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the role of warfarin in these high-risk patients remains uncertain. Our objective was to clarify the association between warfarin use and risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing dialysis.PubMed and Embase from January 1966 to January 2015 were searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies, patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, and reported quantitative estimates of the multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for future stroke associated with warfarin use. We identified 8 studies, with a total of 9539 participants and 706 stroke events. Three studies reported total stroke as primary endpoint and other studies reported ischemic stroke as primary endpoint. Pooling the results showed that warfarin use was associated with higher risk of any stroke (RR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99). By stroke type, warfarin was not significantly linked to risk of ischemic stroke (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.57, P = 0.97), but was related to greater hemorrhagic stroke risk (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.62-3.27). Warfarin heightened overall bleeding risk (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), but not death (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.21).Among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, use of warfarin is associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke, but did not increase overall mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Models, Statistical; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants are being presented as alternatives to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Yet direct comparative trials between these agents in prevention of acute limb ischemia (ALI) are unavailable so far.. To conduct an adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis between direct oral agents for prevention of acute limb ischemia in atrial fibrillation.. We conducted a systematic literature review searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 through November 2014. Two blinded investigators reviewed all potentially relevant articles in a parallel manner by using a priori defined criteria. To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents, only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with follow-up durations of >1 year were included. The primary efficacy outcome was the end point of acute limb ischemia and/or extremity embolism.. A total of 44,563 patients from three RCTs met criteria for inclusion. Patients randomized to direct oral anticoagulants had a non-significant decreased risk for acute limb ischemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.2). In the analysis between agents, however, rivaroxaban significantly lowered the risk of ALI compared to warfarin (RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.064-0.82), apixaban (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.081-0.83), and dabigatran (RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.077-0.83).. Significant differences in prevention of acute limb ischemia may exist between oral anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban lowers the risk of limb embolism versus warfarin, apixaban and dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Ischemia; Leg; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Creatinine; Diabetes Complications; Drugs, Investigational; Europe; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Myocardial Infarction; North America; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Tachycardia; Thrombophilia; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent clinical complication in dialysis patients, and warfarin therapy represents the most common approach for reducing the risk of stroke in this population. However, current evidence based on observational studies, offer conflicting results, whereas no randomized controlled trials have been carried out so far. Additionally, many clinicians are wary of the possible role of warfarin as vascular calcification inducer and its potential to increase the high risk of bleeding among patients on dialysis. Ideally the most promising therapy would be based on direct inhibitors of factor IIa or Xa; however, at the moment, none of these drugs can be safely prescribed in dialysis patients, because of their potentially dangerous accumulation, and the lack of sufficient experience with apixaban or rivaroxaban, two drugs showing a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in end-stage renal disease. Hence, the use of vitamin K inhibitors is currently the only pharmacological option for stroke prevention in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation, leaving the clinicians in a management conundrum.This review discusses the trade-offs implicated in warfarin use for this population, the promises of newly developed drugs, the role of dialysis as atrial fibrillation trigger, as well as potential non-pharmacological management options suitable in selected clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Warfarin

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is associated with more pain and restrictions than other hand osteoarthritis due to the functional importance of the thumb. While the effectiveness of surgical and pharmacological interventions has been widely examined, there is a lack of specific evidence about conservative non-pharmacological trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis therapies. The objective of this systematic review was to provide evidence-based knowledge on the effectiveness of physiotherapy and occupational therapy on pain, function and quality of life.. A literature search of Medline, CINAHL, PEDro, OTseeker, EMB Dare Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials and corresponding systematic reviews, observational studies, pragmatic studies and case-control studies were included. The risk of bias was assessed.. Physical and occupational therapy-related interventions, especially multimodal interventions, seem to be effective to treat pain in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Pre-fabricated neoprene splints and custom-made thermoplastic splints may reduce pain equally. Single interventions seem not to be effective. Significant evidence for effectiveness on function and quality of life could not be found.. The sole Na. The SUV. Genetic variants of

Topics: AC133 Antigen; Acenaphthenes; Acer; Acrosome Reaction; Adult; Agaricales; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Animals, Zoo; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anticoagulants; Antifungal Agents; Antimanic Agents; Antioxidants; Aortic Valve; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Bacillus; Bacterial Toxins; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Base Composition; Beauveria; Binge Drinking; Biomarkers; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Coagulation; Blotting, Western; Brachytherapy; Calcium Channels, L-Type; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Wall; Cells, Cultured; Ceramics; Chi-Square Distribution; China; Chlorophyll; Chlorophyta; Chloroplasts; Cholesterol, HDL; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromobacterium; Clostridium perfringens; Clozapine; Constriction, Pathologic; Coronary Artery Bypass; Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Dental Porcelain; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Stress Analysis; Designer Drugs; Diaminopimelic Acid; DNA Fingerprinting; DNA, Bacterial; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Epsilonproteobacteria; Equipment Design; Ericaceae; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; False Negative Reactions; Fatty Acids; Female; Food Analysis; Fresh Water; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glutathione; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heart Ventricles; HEK293 Cells; Hemolymph; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrothermal Vents; Indoles; Inflammation Mediators; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Insecta; International Normalized Ratio; Isotope Labeling; Itraconazole; Kidney; Kinetics; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors; Lamotrigine; Lanthanoid Series Elements; Limit of Detection; Linear Models; Lipid Peroxidation; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Logistic Models; Lung Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Malondialdehyde; Mediastinum; Metronidazole; Mice; Mice, Nude; Mice, Transgenic; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Middle Aged; Monocytes; Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins; Multivariate Analysis; Myocytes, Cardiac; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Neural Pathways; Nitrates; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Octamer Transcription Factor-3; Odds Ratio; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Peptidoglycan; Phantoms, Imaging; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Phospholipids; Photolysis; Photosynthesis; Phylogeny; Plant Extracts; Polychaeta; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Predictive Value of Tests; Preoperative Care; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quorum Sensing; Radiology, Interventional; Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiotherapy Dosage; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Reference Values; Regression Analysis; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Rhizosphere; Risk Factors; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; ROC Curve; Rutin; Saphenous Vein; Seawater; Selenium; Semen Preservation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Septal Nuclei; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Serum Albumin; Serum Albumin, Human; Shear Strength; Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m; Sodium-Hydrogen Exchangers; Soil Microbiology; SOXB1 Transcription Factors; Spain; Species Specificity; Sperm Motility; Spermatozoa; Spheroids, Cellular; Spores, Fungal; Stroke; Superoxide Dismutase; Swine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Technetium Compounds; Technetium Tc 99m Exametazime; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; Temperature; Thiosulfates; Thrombosis; Thyroid Neoplasms; Transducers; Transfection; Transplantation, Heterologous; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Tumor Burden; Urocortins; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vacuoles; Valproic Acid; Ventral Tegmental Area; Vitamin K 2; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin; Water Microbiology; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disorder, and increases in prevalence with increasing age and the number of cardiovascular comorbidities. AF is characterized by a rapid and irregular heartbeat that can be asymptomatic or lead to symptoms such as palpitations, dyspnoea and dizziness. The condition can also be associated with serious complications, including an increased risk of stroke. Important recent developments in the clinical epidemiology and management of AF have informed our approach to this arrhythmia. This Primer provides a comprehensive overview of AF, including its epidemiology, mechanisms and pathophysiology, diagnosis, screening, prevention and management. Management strategies, including stroke prevention, rate control and rhythm control, are considered. We also address quality of life issues and provide an outlook on future developments and ongoing clinical trials in managing this common arrhythmia.

Topics: Ablation Techniques; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dizziness; Dyspnea; Electric Countershock; Flecainide; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Propafenone; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Sodium Channel Blockers; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend 3 months of anticoagulation after replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis. However, there remains great variability in the current clinical practice and conflicting results from clinical studies. To assist clinical decision making, we pooled the existing evidence to assess whether anticoagulation in the setting of a new bioprosthesis was associated with improved outcomes or greater risk of bleeding.. We searched the PubMed database from the inception of these databases until April 2015 to identify original studies (observational studies or clinical trials) that assessed anticoagulation with warfarin in comparison with either aspirin or no antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. We included the studies if their outcomes included thromboembolism or stroke/transient ischemic attacks and bleeding events. Quality assessment was performed in accordance with the Newland Ottawa Scale, and random effects analysis was used to pool the data from the available studies. I(2) testing was done to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. After screening through 170 articles, a total of 13 studies (cases=6431; controls=18210) were included in the final analyses. The use of warfarin was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall bleeding (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.08; P<0.0001) or bleeding risk at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.34; P<0.0001) compared with aspirin or placebo. With regard to composite primary outcome variables (risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) at 3 months, no significant difference was seen with warfarin (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.56; P=0.67). Moreover, anticoagulation was also not shown to improve outcomes at time interval >3 months (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.58; P=0.79).. Contrary to the current guidelines, a meta-analysis of previous studies suggests that anticoagulation in the setting of an aortic bioprosthesis significantly increases bleeding risk without a favorable effect on thromboembolic events. Larger, randomized controlled studies should be performed to further guide this clinical practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve; Aspirin; Bioprosthesis; Drug Administration Schedule; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have gained a lot of popularity as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in various clinical settings. However, there is conflicting opinion regarding the absolute benefit of NOAC use in elderly patients. Low body mass, altered body composition of fat and muscle, renal impairment and concurrent presence of multiple comorbidities predispose elderly patients to many adverse effects with NOACs that are typically not seen in younger patients. There have been reports that NOAC use, in particular dabigatran, is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Diagnosis and management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the elderly is difficult due to the absence of commonly available drug-specific antidotes that can rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects. Moreover, in elderly patients, a number of factors such as the presence of other comorbid medical conditions, renal insufficiency, drug interactions from polypharmacy, risk of falls and dementia need to be considered before prescribing anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients frequently have compromised renal function, and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance for NOACs need to be made. As each NOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, an individualized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To investigate the safety and efficacy of dual antithrombotic regimen of warfarin and clopidogrel in patients who underwent coronary stenting and were with chronic oral anticoagulation.. Two investigators independently searched Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane for all reported studies, and yielding 6 articles, published before April 2015, enrolling 4 825 patients, follow-up for at least 12 months. Two investigators independently recorded the data regarding interventions and the occurrence of major bleeding, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death. RevMan5.3 was used to do analysis.. Patients on dual antithrombotic regimen had insignificant reduction in major bleeding (odds ratio[OR]was 0.73, 95% confidence interval[CI]was from 0.46 to 1.14, and P=0.16) as compared with triple therapy. While the risk of ischemic stroke (OR= 0.78, 95%CI:0.44-1.38, P=0.39), myocardial infarction (OR= 1.19, 95%CI:0.92-1.53, P=0.18) and the overall incidence of death (OR=0.95, 95%CI:0.56-1.60, P=0.84) were also comparable between the two regimens.. Dual antithrombotic regimen of warfarin and clopidogrel is comparable to the recommended triple therapy in respect to the prevention of thromboembolic outcomes of MI/ death and ischemic stroke, while the risk of bleeding is similar in those patients with indications for chronic oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device.. A network meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow-up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All-cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow-up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29-0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22-0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20-0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26-0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18-0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16-0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all-cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68-0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57-0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44-0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25-0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80-0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82-0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82-0.96]) reduced risk of all-cause death as compared to VKA.. The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing public health concern and remains an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke. Warfarin, a commonly used oral anticoagulant, is associated with a 60-70 % relative reduction in stroke risk and a reduction in mortality of 26 %. However, warfarin has several limitations, including a narrow therapeutic window, variable dose response, multiple interactions with other drugs and concurrent illnesses, and the need for frequent laboratory monitoring. In recent years, the direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, have been developed to overcome the limitations of warfarin therapy. These treatment strategies are either comparable or superior to warfarin in stroke prevention in AF. Despite the documented effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in AF, patients may not derive optimal benefit if they fail to adhere or fail to continue with their medication. This may lead to treatment failure, increased hospitalization and mortality. This review summarizes the literature regarding adherence and persistence (or discontinuation) rates with oral anticoagulants in the management of AF; the impact of non-adherence and non-persistence on treatment outcomes; and the effectiveness of strategies to improve adherence and persistence with oral anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Protocols; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are proven alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, there are few data on the efficacy and safety of NOAC therapy after cardioversion, where the risk of thromboembolic events is heightened.. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of patients who underwent both electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, and X-VeRT trials. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding at ≤42 days of follow-up.. The analysis pooled 3949 patients in whom a total of 4900 cardioversions for atrial fibrillation were performed. Compared with VKAs, NOAC therapy was associated with a similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.34-2.04) and major bleeding (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.52-2.42); no significant statistical heterogeneity was found among studies (Cochrane Q P = .59, I(2) = 0% for stroke/systemic embolism; P = .47; I(2) = 0% for major bleeding).. The short-term incidences of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events after cardioversion on NOACs were low and comparable to those observed on dose-adjusted VKA therapy. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are a reasonable alternative to VKAs in patients undergoing cardioversion.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. As a group, NOACs significantly reduce stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with warfarin. All NOACs are dependent on the kidney for elimination, such that patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min were excluded from all the pivotal phase 3 NOAC trials. It therefore remains unclear how or if NOACs should be prescribed to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those on dialysis. The authors review the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) and those on dialysis. The authors frame the evidence in terms of risk versus benefit to bring greater clarity to NOAC-related major bleeding and efficacy at preventing stroke specifically in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The management of stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed in the last few years. Despite the benefits of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), decisions about the optimal agent remain a challenge. We provide a visual aid tool to guide clinicians and patients in the decision process of selecting oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention.. We created visual plots representing benefits of warfarin versus NOACs from a meta-analysis comprising 58,541 participants. Visual plots (Cates plots) were created using software available at nntonline.net. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism during the study period.. In the chosen meta-analysis, 29,312 participants received a NOAC and 29,229 participants received warfarin. For every 1000 patients with AF, 38 would have a stroke or systemic embolic event in the warfarin group compared to 31 in the NOAC group (RR .81; 95% CI .73-.91). Fifteen patients would develop an intracranial hemorrhage in the warfarin group compared to 7 in the NOAC group (RR .48; 95% CI .39-.59). Conversely, 25 patients would develop gastrointestinal bleeding in the NOAC group compared to 20 in the warfarin group (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.01-1.55).. For every 1000 treated individuals with AF, NOACs would prevent stroke or systemic embolism in 7 additional patients and cerebral hemorrhage in 8 additional patients compared to warfarin. On the other hand, 5 more patients would develop gastrointestinal bleeding with NOACs compared to warfarin. These data are visually shown in Cates plots, facilitating conversations with patients regarding anticoagulation decisions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Audiovisual Aids; Decision Support Techniques; Embolism; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Software; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Cryptogenic stroke is one-fourth among cerebral infarction, but most of them could be ascribed to embolic stroke. ESUS was proposed for unifying embolic stroke of undetermined sources by Hart et al. in 2014. The etiologies underlying ESUS included minor-risk potential cardioembolic sources, covert paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, cancer-associated coagulopathy and embolism, arteriogenic emboli, and paroxysmal embolism. Extensive evaluation including transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac monitoring for long time could identify the etiology of these patients. Although anti-platelet drug is recommended in ESUS in the current guideline, clinical trials are ongoing to determine the efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in ESUS patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Embolism; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cardiac source of emboli in cardioembolic stroke which occupies from 1/4 to 1/3 of acute brain infarction in Japan. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been used widely because they are easy to use, their effect in preventing ischemic stroke is higher than or as high as warfarin, their incidence of major hemorrhage is lower than or as low as warfarin, and their incidence of intracranial hemorrhage is much lower than warfarin. However, there seem several issues to address regarding NOAC treatment, such as reversal of anticoagulation, antidotes, monitoring of anticoagulation, rt-PA treatment for acute stroke patients treated with NOACs. In this review, current strategies and issues of anticoagulation for prevention of stroke in NVAF are discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Emerging observational studies using propensity score (PS) methods assessed real-world comparative effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare treatment effect estimates of NOACs between PS studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Electronic databases and conference proceedings were searched systematically. Primary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the data by pooling the PS- and RCT-derived hazard ratios (HRs) separately. The ratio of HRs (RHR) from the ratio of PS-derived HRs relative to RCT-derived HRs was used to determine whether there was a difference between estimates from PS studies and RCTs. There were 10 PS studies and 5 RCTs included for analysis. No significant difference of treatment effect estimates between the PS studies and RCTs was observed: RHR 1.11, 95 % CI 0.98-1.23 for stroke or SE; RHR 1.07, 95 % CI 0.87-1.34 for major bleeding. A significant association between NOACs and risk of stroke or SE was observed: HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.83-0.94 for the PS studies; HR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.72-0.87 for the RCTs. However, no relationship between NOACs and risk of major bleeding was found: HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.79-1.05 for the PS studies; HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.73-1.00 for the RCTs. In this study, treatment effect estimates of NOACs versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular AF from PS studies are found to be in agreement with those from RCTs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Propensity Score; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Over the last two decades the interest on patent foramen ovale (PFO) as a cause of cardioembolism in cryptogenic stroke has tremendously increased, thanks to the availability of better techniques to diagnose cardiac right-to-left shunt by ultrasounds and of percutaneous means of PFO treatment with interventional techniques. Many studies have been published that have attempted to define diagnostic methodology, prognosis, and optimal treatment (pharmacological or percutaneous closure) of PFO patients with cryptogenic stroke. Unfortunately, even today, definitive evidence is still lacking, and clinical management is not consistent among cardiologists.. This review aims to evaluate the role of PFO in cryptogenic stroke, the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler, contrast transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of left-fright shunt and PFO; and discuss the indications to medical treatment and percutaneous closure of PFO.. All studies published in the literature on PFO and cryptogenic stroke are considered and discussed.. We define an appropriate diagnostic and clinical management of PFO patients with cryptogenic stroke.. After many years of interest on PFO and many concluded studies, there are still no definitive data. However, we are on good track for an appropriate management of PFO patients and cryptogenic stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiac Catheterization; Echocardiography; Embolism, Paradoxical; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone of stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE), resulting in a reduction in thrombotic complications and mortality. Benefit of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in such patients has been unambiguously confirmed, but VKA use is complicated by need for regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio and multiple drug and food interactions. Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that can be used with fixed doses, without the need for routine anticoagulation laboratory monitoring and the advantage of few drug or diet interactions. Dabigatran is effective for stroke and systemic thromboembolism in AF and for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE. The drug has a good safety profile and consistently shows a reduction in intracranial hemorrhage risk compared to warfarin. A specific reversal agent for dabigatran has been approved by FDA and EU. This review provides a summary of publications assessing clinical utility of dabigatran for different indications.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Since 2009, four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. While they are currently first-line therapy for a majority of patients, there are a number of clinical situations where warfarin is preferable. In both randomised trials and real-world populations, use of DOACs significantly reduces the risk of intracranial haemorrhage as compared with warfarin. While drug-specific reversal agents are currently only available for dabigatran, andexanet alpha is pending approval for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors, reducing concerns about major bleeding for many patients and providers. DOACs can be held for 2-4 days prior to a procedure, depending on a patient's renal function, but should not be restarted too rapidly post-procedurally given their fast time to peak activity (∼2 hours). The anticoagulation clinic should play an important role in managing patients on all oral anticoagulation, both warfarin and DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Patient Selection; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and represents one-third of the arrhythmia-related hospital admissions in the developed countries. Embolic strokes associated with AF are more severe and disabling. Thromboembolic stroke prevention is a major goal in treatment of AF and Warfarin has successfully served this purpose for many years. Drug-drug interaction and regular monitoring with Warfarin pose a significant challenge where health care system has limited resources; and lack of a well-structured health system, hinders regular International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have opened up a new exciting chapter in the field of anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This review discussed the landmark trials that led to the development of NOACs and explored the potentials of these new agents with simultaneous comparison of Warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

One in every five strokes is due to atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulation is the evidence-based practice for stroke risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation. After decades of using warfarin, the recent years have seen an exponential increase in the available oral anticoagulants. An understanding of where things stand regarding indications, relative safety and efficacy as well as the limitations of each available choice is crucial.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is found in a third of all ischaemic strokes, even more after post-stroke atrial fibrillation monitoring. Data from stroke registries show that both unknown and untreated or under treated atrial fibrillation is responsible for most of these strokes, which are often fatal or debilitating. Most could be prevented if efforts were directed towards detection of atrial fibrillation before stroke occurs, through screening or case finding, and treatment of all patients with atrial fibrillation at increased risk of stroke with well-controlled vitamin K antagonists or non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. The default strategy should be to offer anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis to all patients with atrial fibrillation unless defined as truly low risk by simple validated risk scores, such as CHA2DS2-VASc. Assessment of bleeding risk using the HAS-BLED score should focus attention on reversible bleeding risk factors. Finally, patients need support from physicians and various other sources to start anticoagulant treatment and to ensure adherence to and persistence with treatment in the long term.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Medication Adherence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) by a meta-analysis.. AF is quite prevalent in patients with HF.. Four phase III clinical trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF were included. Each patient was defined as affected by HF according to the criteria of the trial in which the patient was enrolled. Pre-specified outcomes were the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE); major, intracranial, and any bleeding; and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.. A total of 55,011 patients were enrolled, 26,384 (48%) with HF, and 28,627 (52%) without HF; 27,518 receiving NOACs and 27,493 receiving warfarin (median, 70 years of age; 36% females; follow-up: 1.5 to 2.8 years). Rates of SSE (relative risk [RR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.07]; p = 0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.03; p = 0.21) were comparable in patients with and without HF. HF patients had reduced rates of any (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.01) and intracranial (RR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88; p < 0.01) bleeding but increased rates of all-cause (RR: 1.70 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.19; p < 0.01) and CV death (RR: 2.05 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.55; p < 0.01). NOACs, compared with warfarin significantly reduced SSE and major, intracranial, and any bleeding, regardless of the presence or absence of HF (p. Patients with AF and HF had increased mortality but reduced rates of intracranial and any bleeding compared with the no-HF patients, with no differences in rates of SSE and major bleeding. NOACs significantly reduced SSE, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in HF patients. No interactions in efficacy and safety of NOACs were observed between AF patients with and without HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Dabigatran was the first direct-acting oral anticoagulant approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation, based on data from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial. Over 18,000 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and a moderate-to-high risk of thromboembolic stroke were randomized to warfarin or dabigatran. With respect to the primary endpoints for efficacy and safety, dabigatran was superior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and thromboembolism and noninferior with respect to major bleeding. Although unified by a common arrhythmia and a similar thromboembolic stroke risk, this large patient population is also significantly heterogeneous with respect to other demographics and comorbidities that raise important questions about the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in specific patient populations. Furthermore, there were significant differences between the warfarin and dabigatran groups with respect to several important secondary endpoints. Understanding the differences in outcomes between specific patient subgroups from the RE-LY trial can better inform the practicing clinician's ability to offer the best anticoagulation options to individual patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin have been the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) while low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux and adjusted-dose warfarin or aspirin have been routinely used for thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. However, VKAs are associated with considerable limitations, including increased risk of bleeding and narrow therapeutic window. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs, now referred as Non Vit K dependent oral anticoagulants), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and direct Factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban are now approved alternatives to warfarin for prophylaxis of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with NVAF and treatment and prophylaxis of VTE. The efficacy and safety of NOACs have been proven in several clinical trials. The advantages offered by NOACs such as rapid onset and termination of action, predictable anticoagulant effect, less frequent laboratory monitoring make them promising alternatives to warfarin. However, clinicians in India seek more information over the practical aspects that require due consideration to ensure proper use of these drugs. The article addresses some crucial aspects of NOAC therapy such as measurement of anticoagulant effects, transition between different agents, ensuring drug intake compliance, dealing with dosing errors, management of bleeding complications etc based on the guidance offered by the European Heart Rhythm Association in 2013.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; India; Pyrazoles; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), including stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), are at high risk for stroke-related morbidity, mortality and bleeding. The overall risk/benefit balance of warfarin treatment among patients with ESRD and AF remains unclear.. We systematically reviewed the associations of warfarin use and stroke outcome, bleeding outcome or mortality in patients with ESRD and AF. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in Feb 2016 using key words related to ESRD, AF and warfarin in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library without language restriction. We searched for randomized trials and observational studies that compared the use of warfarin with no treatment, aspirin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and reported quantitative risk estimates on these outcomes. Paired reviewers screened articles, collected data and performed qualitative assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies of Interventions. We conducted meta-analyses using the random-effects model with the DerSimonian - Laird estimator and the Knapp-Hartung methods as appropriate.. We identified 2709 references and included 20 observational cohort studies that examined stroke outcome, bleeding outcome and mortality associated with warfarin use in 56,146 patients with ESRD and AF. The pooled estimates from meta-analysis for the stroke outcome suggested that warfarin use was not associated with all-cause stroke (HR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.74-1.16) or any stroke (HR = 1.01, 95 % CI 0.81-1.26), or ischemic stroke (HR = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.58-1.11) among patients with ESRD and AF. In contrast, warfarin use was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause bleeding (HR = 1.21, 95 % CI 1.01-1.44), but not associated with major bleeding (HR = 1.18, 95 % CI 0.82-1.69) or gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI 0.81-1.76) or any bleeding (HR = 1.21, 95 % CI 0.99-1.48). There was insufficient evidence to evaluate the association between warfarin use and mortality in this population (pooled risk estimate not calculated due to high heterogeneity). Results on DOACs were inconclusive due to limited relevant studies.. Given the absence of efficacy and an increased bleeding risk, these findings call into question the use of warfarin for AF treatment among patients with ESRD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Warfarin

Among patients with atrial fibrillation, prophylaxis for stroke prevention with the use of anticoagulation is well established in the general population. A number of randomized controlled trials and evidence-based risk prediction tools clearly delineate the benefit and risks of therapy. Despite the high incidence of atrial fibrillation in the late stage CKD and ESRD populations, little high quality evidence exists in these populations. Is it appropriate then to extrapolate findings from the general population to those with CKD/ESRD? In our view, too much uncertainty exists regarding proof of efficacy with clear signals of harm. Routine anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is not recommended for the majority of CKD and ESRD patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Approximately 750,000 US adults per year experience a stroke. On average, the annual risk for future ischemic stroke (secondary stroke) after an initial ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack is approximately 3% to 4%. Cardioembolic strokes account for 20% to 25% of all strokes, with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) considered one of the main sources of embolism; this explains up to half of all cardioembolic strokes. We present the risk factors for stroke in NVAF, risk stratification, a diagnosis of NVAF, and treatment and prevention of stroke in NVAF. We reviewed the literature by performing a PubMed search of articles focusing on secondary stroke prevention in NVAF. This review examines the findings of major clinical trials and society guidelines for secondary stroke prevention in NVAF and presents a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

The elderly with atrial fibrillation are more prone to stroke. Oral anticoagulants such as warfarin are effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation-associated stroke and systemic embolism. The CHADS

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Warfarin

This review evaluates the research undertaken in the last six years on the use of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and provides evidence-based answers to common clinical questions. Two types of new oral anticoagulants - direct thrombin (IIa) inhibitors, and Xa inhibitors - are currently available. These drugs have similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. They are more predictable than, though in many respects comparable to, warfarin. They do not require frequent laboratory tests, nor do they have a narrow therapeutic window. When a patient requires surgery, new oral anticoagulants are easier to manage than warfarin due to their short half-lives. Short half-lives reduce the length of bleeding events. Information obtained from risk calculators such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED should be considered before prescribing. New oral anticoagulants are useful in every day clinical practice, but there are complex factors that should be considered in each patient before prescribing to implement the best practice and achieve the best results.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is currently a very prevalent disease and it represents one of the most common causes of disabling stroke. Antithrombotic therapies have reduced the incidence of this complication although they pose many limitations and difficulties. As a result, a large number of high risk patients do not receive an appropriate treatment. In recent years, four new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) with relevant advantages in comparison to vitaminK antagonists have been released. Four large phaseiii clinical trials have demonstrated that NOAC are at least as safe and efficacious as warfarin in stroke prevention in non-valve atrial fibrillation patients with moderate-high thrombotic risk, being their main advantage the reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. The arrival of these drugs has caused great expectations in the management of these patients but also new doubts. Lacking data in some subgroups of frail patients, the absence of specific antidotes available and specially their high cost represent nowadays the main limitations for their generalization.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To investigate the relative effect of warfarin versus non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in subgroups of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction.. Systemic review and meta-regression analyses on NOACs versus warfarin, supplemented with indirect comparisons were conducted. The eligibility criteria for inclusion were randomised controlled trials comparing NOACs against warfarin for stroke prevention in AF patients. Outcomes of interest were stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding.. Five studies comprising 72,845 AF patients randomised to either a NOAC or warfarin were included in the meta-regression analysis. A shift in strata from no renal impairment to renal impairment resulted in a non-significant impact on bleeding and stroke/SE, indicating similar safety and efficacy, despite renal function status. Apixaban was associated with less major bleeding compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban but not edoxaban in patients with moderate renal impairment. For efficacy outcomes, only dabigatran 150 mg was statistically significantly favoured compared to edoxaban 30 mg. For efficacy outcomes in mild renal impairment, both dabigatran 150 mg and rivaroxaban 10 mg (J-ROCKET) were statistically significantly favoured against edoxaban 30 mg.. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants had similar efficacy and safety compared to warfarin across different levels of renal function. Indirect comparisons suggest that apixaban and edoxaban were associated with a better safety profile in patients with moderate renal impairment. However, caution is warranted when interpreting indirect comparisons of drugs investigated in different trials. Prescribers should fit the most appropriate NOAC to the AF patient characteristics (and vice versa) to individualise effective stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

As a class, the target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) are at least as effective as warfarin, often with superior safety for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prevention of recurrent VTE. Currently, dabigatran, the direct thrombin inhibitor, along with rivaroxaban and apixaban, direct factor Xa inhibitors, has been approved in multiple countries for these indications. Edoxaban, which has received approval for the abovementioned indications in Japan, has demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to or better than warfarin in Phase III clinical trials and is under further regulatory consideration. It is anticipated that the use of TSOACs will increase as practitioners and healthcare systems gain familiarity with these drugs and adopt their use into clinical practice. This review will provide a brief overview of the TSOAC Phase III clinical trials for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with AF and the Phase III clinical trials for the prevention of recurrent VTE, discuss current treatment guidelines, address how TSOACs may help meet national safety goals, and provide clinical decision-making guidance regarding the use of TSOACs for hospitalists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hospitalists; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Coumarin anticoagulants (acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon, and warfarin) are generally used for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or for the therapy and prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the safe use of coumarin anticoagulants is restricted by a narrow therapeutic window and large interindividual dosing variations. Some studies found that the effectiveness and safety of coumarin anticoagulants therapy were increased by pharmacogenetic-guided dosing algorithms, while others found no significant effect of genotype-guided therapy.. Four electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to March 1, 2014, for randomized controlled trials of patients who received coumarin anticoagulants according to genotype-guided dosing algorithms. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) was within the normal range (2.0-3.0). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding events, thromboembolic events, and INR ≥4 events.. Eight studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Genotype-guided dosing of coumarin anticoagulants improved the percentage of time within the therapeutic INR range (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.28; P = .02; I(2) = 70%). Subgroup analysis was performed after dividing the nongenotype-guided group into a standard-dose group (95% CI, 0.14-0.49; P = .0004; I(2) = 50%) and a clinical variables-guided dosing algorithm group (95% CI, -0.07-0.15; P = .48; I(2) = 34%). There is a statistically significant reduction in numbers of secondary outcomes (INR ≥4 events, major bleeding events, and thromboembolic events; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00; P = .04). Subgroup analysis of secondary outcomes showed no significant difference between genotype-guided dosing and clinical variables-guided dosing (95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P = .57; I(2) = 11%), but genotype-guided dosing reduced secondary outcomes compared with standard dosing (95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .006; I(2) = 0%).. This meta-analysis showed that genotype-guided dosing increased the effectiveness and safety of coumarin therapy compared with standard dosing but did not have advantages compared with clinical variables-guided dosing.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Genotype; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pharmacogenetics; Phenprocoumon; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) technology is a percutaneously delivered permanent cardiac implant placed in the LAA. This device is designed to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in warfarin-eligible patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The first circulatory system device panel reviewed the Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (PROTECT AF) study in 2009, and a "not approvable" letter was issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on safety concerns. Subsequently, the FDA, collaboratively with the sponsor, designed a new Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the WATCHMAN LAAC Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long-Term Warfarin Therapy (PREVAIL) trial to address the earlier study limitations. A second panel was convened in December 2013 to review the results of PREVAIL and additional long-term follow-up data from PROTECT AF. The second panel voted favorably 13 to 1 that the benefits of the WATCHMAN LAAC therapy do outweigh the risks for use in patients who meet the criteria specified in the proposed indication. Subsequently, and during the premarket approval review, updated data from the PREVIAL study revealed more ischemic strokes in the WATCHMAN group, corresponding to a total of 13 ischemic strokes in the WATCHMAN group versus 1 in the control group. As a result of these strokes, the FDA called for a third panel to assess the benefit-risk profile of the WATCHMAN device. This summary aims to describe the discussions and recommendations made during the panel meetings.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Device Approval; Embolism; Humans; Prostheses and Implants; Risk Assessment; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

The target-specific oral anticoagulants are a class of agents that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. They are effective and safe compared to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and they are comparable to low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty. For other indications, however, such as the prevention of stroke in patients with mechanical heart valves, initial studies have been unfavorable for the newer agents, leaving warfarin the anticoagulant of choice. Further studies are needed before the target-specific anticoagulants can be recommended for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Concerns also persist about difficulties with the laboratory assessment of anticoagulant effect and the lack of a specific reversal agent. For these reasons, we anticipate that the vitamin K antagonists will continue to be important anticoagulants for years to come.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published through May 31, 2014. Randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulants (warfarin) and antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF were included. The primary outcomes were the rates of stroke and systemic embolism. Secondary outcomes included the rates of hemorrhage/major bleeding and death. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Nine reports of 8 trials that enrolled 4363 patients (2169 patients received anticoagulation and 2194 antiplatelet therapy) were included. All of the studies compared adjusted-dose warfarin or with aspirin, and the majority of the patients were >70 years of age. Anticoagulants were titrated to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 4.5, and aspirin was administered at a dosage of 75 to 325 mg/d. Death occurred in 206 participants treated with an anticoagulant and 229 participants treated with antiplatelet therapy. There was no significant difference in the overall stroke rate between the groups (OR = 0.667, 95% CI 0.426-1.045, P = 0.08); however, patients with nonrheumatic AF (NRAF) treated with an anticoagulant had a lower risk of stroke (OR = 0.557, 95% CI 0.411-0.753, P < 0.001). Anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of embolism (OR = 0.616, 95% CI = 0.392-0.966, P = 0.04), and this finding persisted in patients with NRAF (OR = 0.581, 95% CI 0.359-0.941, P = 0.03). No significant difference in the rate of hemorrhage/major bleeding was noted (OR = 1.497, 95% CI 0.730-3.070, P = 0.27), and this finding persisted on subgroup analysis. Anticoagulants appear to be more effective than aspirin in preventing embolisms in patients with AF, as the risk of bleeding is not increased.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is a growing health problem that is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy reduces the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with AF. OAC therapy is commonly given as a well-controlled vitamin K antagonist (VKA; e.g. warfarin) and can reduce the risk of stroke in AF patients by almost two-thirds. However, the widespread use of VKAs has been hampered by the unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drugs and justifiable concerns about the consequent risk of haemorrhage. The non-VKA OACs (NOACs) have revolutionized thromboprophylaxis in AF by providing therapeutic options with predictable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that are as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of stroke and thromboembolism but are more convenient to use. In this review, we provide a patient-centred framework to assist clinicians in recommending the right OAC therapy to fit the individual patient with AF, including methods for stratifying the risk of stroke and haemorrhage and the chances of achieving tight control of VKA anticoagulation, and we discuss the properties of the NOACs that favour their use in particular patient cohorts.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient-Centered Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for many indications. These agents include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. All 4 agents are licensed in the United States for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism and rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. The NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin, but are not only more convenient to administer because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring but also are safer because they are associated with less intracranial bleeding. As part of a theme series on the NOACs, this article (1) compares the pharmacological profiles of the NOACs with that of warfarin, (2) identifies the doses of the NOACs for each approved indication, (3) provides an overview of the completed phase III trials with the NOACs, (4) briefly discusses the ongoing studies with the NOACs for new indications, (5) reviews the emerging real-world data with the NOACs, and (6) highlights the potential opportunities for the NOACs and identifies the remaining challenges.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Practical management of stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) requires physicians to find the optimal balance between maximizing prevention of ischaemic stroke and minimizing the risk of bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists have traditionally been used for stroke prevention in patients with AF; however, they have been associated with increased risk of bleeding, particularly intracranial haemorrhage. New oral anticoagulants (OACs) have shown similar efficacy to the vitamin K antagonist warfarin but with a reduced risk of bleeding, particularly life-threatening bleeding such as intracranial haemorrhage. Decisions about which new OAC therapy to use may be influenced by patient characteristics such as age, renal function, co-medication use, and bleeding risk. This review uses a case-based approach to highlight the practical management issues to be considered by the physician when selecting a new OAC for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known as one of the independent risk factors for stroke and might significantly increase its risk. Nowadays, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed and demonstrated a more promising option to warfarin, the conclusion for safety is heterogeneous in different studies. It indicates the importance of comprehensive comparison of safety between DOACs and warfarin.. Four studies including ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, RE-LY and ROCKET-AF were included in the meta-analysis to perform separate meta-analyses for high-dose regimen, low-dose regimen and their combination. The events included major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, non-major clinically relevant and minor bleeding.. Regardless of high dose or low dose regimen, DOACs were associated with lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage but due to no significant association for gastrointestinal bleeding, the overall effect measured by the major bleeding was also insignificant (High dose: RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01; Low dose: RR=0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04). However, the combined result of high-dose and low-dose regimens showed DOACs were associated with lower risk of major bleeding events (RR=0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.95).. Meta-analyses have showed the comparative safety of the direct-acting oral anticoagulants than warfarin in most endpoints and even better in intracranial haemorrhage. Therefore, without the need of INR monitoring, DOACs demonstrated promising alternatives to warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Risk; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increase in mortality and morbidity, with a substantial increase in stroke and systemic thromboembolism. Strokes related to AF are associated with higher mortality, greater disability, longer hospital stays, and lower chance of being discharged home than strokes unrelated to AF.. To provide an overview of current concepts and recent developments in stroke prevention in AF, with suggestions for practical management.. A comprehensive structured literature search was performed using MEDLINE for studies published through March 11, 2015, that reported on AF and stroke, bleeding risk factors, and stroke prevention.. The risk of stroke in AF is reduced by anticoagulant therapy. Thromboprophylaxis can be obtained with vitamin K antagonists (VKA, eg, warfarin) or a non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC). Major guidelines emphasize the important role of oral anticoagulation (OAC) for effective stroke prevention in AF. Initially, clinicians should identify low-risk AF patients who do not require antithrombotic therapy (ie, CHA2DS2-VASc score, 0 for men; 1 for women). Subsequently, patients with at least 1 stroke risk factor (except when the only risk is being a woman) should be offered OAC. A patient's individual risk of bleeding from antithrombotic therapy should be assessed, and modifiable risk factors for bleeding should be addressed (blood pressure control, discontinuing unnecessary medications such as aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The international normalized ratio should be tightly controlled for patients receiving VKAs.. Stroke prevention is central to the management of AF, irrespective of a rate or rhythm control strategy. Following the initial focus on identifying low-risk patients, all others with 1 or more stroke risk factors should be offered OAC.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of warfarin therapy in hemodialysis (HD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Thus, we performed, up to date, the first meta-analysis on the risks of stroke and bleeding in warfarin treatment in these populations.. The relevant literature was searched using the following electronic databases without any language restrictions: the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, ISI, Ovid, and Chinese Biomedical Database from the establishment of the database to October 2014. The studies were included if (a) studies described the risk of stroke or bleeding with or without warfarin in dialysis patients with AF, (b) studies provided information about hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of stroke or bleeding, and (c) the study design was a clinical cohort. The inverse variance method was used to obtain overall HRs and 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias were also performed. We identified six eligible studies with a total of 9816 patients. Combined HRs showed that warfarin cannot prevent strokes in HD patients with AF (HR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.80-1.87; P = 0.347), but its use was associated with a higher risk of bleeding (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39; P = 0.019).. This meta-analysis suggested that warfarin should not be recommended for the routine treatment of HD patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although these agents overcome some disadvantages of warfarin, they are associated with increased costs. In this review, we will provide an overview of the cost-effectiveness of NOACs for stroke prevention in AF. Our comments and conclusions are limited to studies directly comparing all available NOACs within the same framework. The available cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that NOACs are cost-effective compared to warfarin, with apixaban likely being most favorable. However, significant limitations in these models are present and should be appreciated when interpreting their results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The risk-benefit ratio of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) versus systemic therapy (warfarin) for prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) requires continued evaluation.. This study sought to assess composite data regarding left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in 2 randomized trials compared to warfarin for prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death in patients with nonvalvular AF.. Our meta-analysis included 2,406 patients with 5,931 patient-years (PY) of follow-up from the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device In Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trials, and their respective registries (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry and Continued Access to PREVAIL registry).. With mean follow-up of 2.69 years, patients receiving LAAC with the Watchman device had significantly fewer hemorrhagic strokes (0.15 vs. 0.96 events/100 patient-years [PY]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.22; p = 0.004), cardiovascular/unexplained death (1.1 vs. 2.3 events/100 PY; HR: 0.48; p = 0.006), and nonprocedural bleeding (6.0% vs. 11.3%; HR: 0.51; p = 0.006) compared with warfarin. All-cause stroke or systemic embolism was similar between both strategies (1.75 vs. 1.87 events/100 PY; HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.7; p = 0.94). There were more ischemic strokes in the device group (1.6 vs. 0.9 and 0.2 vs. 1.0 events/100 PY; HR: 1.95 and 0.22, respectively; p = 0.05 and 0.004, respectively). Both trials and registries identified similar event rates and consistent device effect in multiple subsets.. In patients with NVAF at increased risk for stroke or bleeding who are candidates for chronic anticoagulation, LAAC resulted in improved rates of hemorrhagic stroke, cardiovascular/unexplained death, and nonprocedural bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. Strokes that occur as a complication of AF are usually more severe and associated with a higher disability or morbidity and mortality rate compared with non-AF-related strokes. The risk of stroke in AF is dependent on several risk factors; AF itself acts as an independent risk factor for stroke. The combination of effective anticoagulation therapy, risk stratification (based on stroke risk scores, such as CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc), and recommendations provided by guidelines is essential for decreasing the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Although effective in preventing the occurrence of stroke, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) are associated with several limitations. Therefore, direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, dabigatran etexilate, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have emerged as an alternative to the VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. Compared with the VKAs, these agents have more favorable pharmacological characteristics and, unlike the VKAs, they are given at fixed doses without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. It remains important that physicians use these direct oral anticoagulants responsibly to ensure optimal safety and effectiveness. This article provides an overview of the existing data on the direct oral anticoagulants, focusing on management protocols for aiding physicians to optimize anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF, particularly in special patient populations (e.g., those with renal impairment) and other specific clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Strokes, whether ischaemic or haemorrhagic, are the most feared complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its treatment. Vitamin K antagonists have been the mainstay of stroke prevention. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants have been introduced. The advantages and disadvantages of these treatment strategies have been extensively discussed. In this narrative review, we discuss dilemmas faced by primary care clinicians in the context of stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in patients with AF. We discuss the classification of stroke, the different types of stroke seen with AF, the prognosis of AF-related strokes, the early management after AF-related stroke or TIA and the therapeutic options after anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage. Most importantly, we aim to dispel common misconceptions on the part of non-stroke specialists that can lead to suboptimal stroke prevention and management.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Management; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Prognosis; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and predisposes patients to an increased risk of embolic stroke. After nearly 60 years, warfarin is no longer the only effective therapeutic option for patients with AF. Large randomized trials have consistently shown that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban significantly reduce from the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with warfarin. We provide a focused review regarding the NOACs and ICH in AF patients by summarizing findings of these large clinical trials, mechanisms of lower ICH, reversal strategies with specific agents, and monitoring strategies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Coagulants; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Given its manifold potential therapeutic applications and amenability to modification, noscapine is a veritable "Renaissance drug" worthy of commemoration. Perhaps the only facet of noscapine's profile more astounding than its versatility is its virtual lack of side effects and addictive properties, which distinguishes it from other denizens of Papaver somniferum. This review intimately chronicles the rich intellectual and pharmacological history behind the noscapine family of compounds, the length of whose arms was revealed over decades of patient scholarship and experimentation. We discuss the intriguing story of this family of nontoxic alkaloids, from noscapine's purification from opium at the turn of the 19th century in Paris to the recent torrent of rationally designed analogs with tremendous anticancer potential. In between, noscapine's unique pharmacology; impact on cellular signaling pathways, the mitotic spindle, and centrosome clustering; use as an antimalarial drug and cough suppressant; and exceptional potential as a treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome, strokes, and diverse malignancies are catalogued. Seminal experiments involving some of its more promising analogs, such as amino-noscapine, 9-nitronoscapine, 9-bromonoscapine, and reduced bromonoscapine, are also detailed. Finally, the bright future of these oftentimes even more exceptional derivatives is described, rounding out a portrait of a truly remarkable family of compounds.

Topics: Alkaloids; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Centrosome; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Female; Humans; Male; Microtubules; Neoplasms; Noscapine; Papaver; Plant Extracts; Stroke; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are at increased risk of stroke; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of different approaches to prevent this major complication.. We conducted electronic database searches of phase III randomized controlled trials. The groups were novel oral anticoagulants, Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion device (DEVICE), and warfarin. Efficacy outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Safety outcome was major bleeding and procedure-related complications. A subgroup analysis of the elderly population was done. We used random-effects model to compare pooled outcomes and tested for heterogeneity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for each outcome. Seven randomized controlled trials (n=73,978) were included. There was a significant difference favoring novel oral anticoagulants for systemic embolism (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97; P=0.01), all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P<0.001), and safety outcomes (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97; P=0.026) compared with warfarin. No difference was seen between DEVICE and warfarin for efficacy end points; however, DEVICE had more complications (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14-3.01; P=0.012). In the elderly (6 randomized controlled trials, n=30,699), systemic embolism was favored with novel oral anticoagulants over warfarin (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87; P≤0.001). No evidence of significant publication bias was found.. Novel oral anticoagulants is superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This benefit was also observed in the elderly population. DEVICE is a reasonable noninferior alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention, but cautious use is essential given safety concerns.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Warfarin

No pooled analysis has been undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), including edoxaban data from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from inception to April 2015. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software.. Four RCTs were included: 19 122 of 32 512 AF patients with HF were allocated to a NOAC (13 384 receiving single-/high-dose NOAC regimens), and 13 390 to warfarin. Among AF patients with HF, single/high-dose NOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/systemic embolic (SE) events by 14% [odds ratio0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.98), and had a 24% lower risk of major bleeding(OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86). For low-dose NOAC regimens, comparable efficacy to warfarin for stroke or SE events (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21) and a non-significant trend for lower major bleeding was observed. Regardless of high- or low-dose NOAC, the incidences of both major bleeding and stroke/SE in AF patients with HF were similar to those without HF. Atrial fibrillation patients with HF on NOACs had a 41% lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared with those without HF (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87).. Among AF patients with HF, single-/high-dose NOAC regimens have a better efficacy and safety profile, but low-dose regimens had similar efficacy and safety to warfarin. NOACs were similarly effective or even safer (less intracranial haemorrhage) in AF patients with HF compared with those without HF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Adjustment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Diseases; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Sweden; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in elderly atrial fibrillation patients remains a challenge. There is a high risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism but also a high risk of bleeding if anticoagulants are prescribed. The elderly have increased chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, polypharmacy, and overall frailty. For all these reasons, anticoagulant use is underutilized in the elderly. In this manuscript, the benefits of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in the elderly patient population with multiple comorbid conditions are reviewed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban (Lixiana(®)) is a new direct oral anticoagulant recently approved in the EU for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and one or more risk factors. In the large, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, oral edoxaban dosages of 30 and 60 mg once daily for a median treatment duration of 907 days in patients with moderate-to-high-risk nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were noninferior to warfarin for the incidence of first stroke or SEE. Both high-dose and low-dose edoxaban were associated with significantly lower rates than warfarin of major bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage, and death from cardiovascular causes. Edoxaban has a rapid onset of action, a short half-life, few drug interactions and offers the convenience of oral, once-daily, fixed-dose administration, without the need for coagulation monitoring and without regard to food. Therefore, edoxaban is an effective and well tolerated therapeutic option in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been proposed as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin with composite end points in patients with atrial fibrillation.. This semi-systematic review performed a study of Phase III randomized controlled trials comparing NOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patient with atrial fibrillation using composite end points (combination of various clinical events). The use of composite end points allowed for combining efficacy and safety outcomes, thereby comparing the differences between NOAC and warfarin therapy from a clinical perspective.. Treatment with NOAC compared with warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in the sum of stroke or non-CNS, systemic embolism and major bleeding (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.91).. Generally, NOACs were associated with a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with warfarin with regard to composite end points.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one additional stroke risk factor. For decades, the vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) remained the only oral anticoagulant available for stroke prevention in AF. The non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now available, and these drugs include the direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. The latter class includes edoxaban, which has recently been approved for stroke prevention in AF by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. In line with other NOACs, edoxaban avoids the many limitations of warfarin associated with variability of anticoagulation effect and multiple food and drug interactions.. In this review, the currently available evidence on edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF is discussed. The pharmacology, efficacy and safety, and current aspects of use of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF for stroke and thromboembolism prevention are reviewed.. Phase III trials on edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF confirms non-inferiority of edoxaban compared to well-managed warfarin both in terms of efficacy and safety. Currently ongoing and future trials as well as real-world data are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and safety for chronic anticoagulation and improve evidence in other areas which are lacking evidence where NOAC use remains controversial.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Risk; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Despite its lack of efficacy, aspirin is commonly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Since prior studies have suggested a benefit of low-intensity anticoagulation over aspirin in the prevention of vascular events, the aim of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with low-intensity anticoagulation with Vitamin K antagonists or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 1946 to October 14th, 2015. Randomized controlled trials were included if they reported the outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with a low-intensity anticoagulation compared to patients treated with aspirin. The primary outcome was a combination of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The random-effects model odds ratio was used as the outcome measure.. Our initial search identified 6309relevant articles of which three satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included. Compared to low-intensity anticoagulation, aspirin alone did not reduce the incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.57-1.56), major bleeding OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.42-2.62) or vascular death OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.61-1.75). The use of aspirin was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.12-2.48).. In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, aspirin provides no benefits over low-intensity anticoagulation. Furthermore, the use of aspirin appears to be associated with an increased risk in all-cause mortality. Our study provides more evidence against the use aspirin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

In routine practice, warfarin is widely used in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention though the ratio of risks to benefits remains unclear. Recent cohort studies investigating the association between warfarin use and the risks of stroke and bleeding in dialysis patients with AF present conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of warfarin use in patients with AF undergoing dialysis. Three databases PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID were searched from their inception to August 2015. Observational studies which assessed the ischemic stroke or bleeding risk of warfarin use in dialysis patients with AF were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed based on the Cochrane Q-statistic test and the I statistic. Metaregression analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. A total of 11 eligible studies with 25,407 patients were included in the analysis. Warfarin use, in comparison with no-warfarin use, was not associated with a lower risk for ischemic stroke (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66-1.35). Sensitivity analyses found results to be robust. Metaregression analysis showed that demographic feature, clinical characteristics, or study-level variable had no impact of warfarin use on stroke risk. In addition, warfarin use was associated with a 27% higher risk for bleeding (95% CI 1.04-1.54). Overall, warfarin use did not have a significant association with reduced mortality (95% CI 0.96-1.11). It appears that warfarin use is not beneficial in reducing stroke risk, but with a high risk for bleeding in dialysis patients with AF. Randomized trials are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of warfarin in dialysis patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Observational Studies as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation relies on an assessment of the individual risks for stroke and bleeding. Patients at high risk for stroke are candidates for anticoagulant therapy. Anticoagulants, however, have substantial bleeding risks that must be weighed in the therapeutic decision. Warfarin has been the traditional choice, but the recently introduced novel oral anticoagulants offer similar efficacy with less bleeding risk. Additionally, they do not require monitoring and have fewer drug interactions and dietary restrictions than warfarin. Several devices, which isolate the left atrial appendage, have become available as treatment options for patients with elevated risks of both thromboembolism and bleeding complications.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Equipment and Supplies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ligation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and share a reciprocal relationship. The presence of AF increases the propensity to HF and can worsen its severity as well as escalating the risk of stroke. Despite the proven efficacy of vitamin K antagonists and warfarin for stroke prevention in AF, their use is beset by numerous problems. These include their slow onset and offset of action, unpredictability of response, the need for frequent coagulant monitoring and serious concerns around the increased risks of intracranial and major bleeding. Three recently approved novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) are already challenging warfarin use in AF. They have a predictable therapeutic response and a wide therapeutic range and do not necessitate coagulation monitoring. In this article, the relationship between HF and AF and the mechanisms for their compounded stroke risk are reviewed. The evidence to support the use of these three NOACs amongst patients with AF and HF is further explored.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Chronic Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is an alternative to standard clinical algorithms and new oral anticoagulants for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, clinical evidence for pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is limited to intermediary outcomes, and consequently, there is a lack of information on the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation treatment options. A clinical trial simulation of S-warfarin was used to predict times within therapeutic range for different dosing algorithms. Relative risks of clinical events, obtained from a meta-analysis of trials linking times within therapeutic range with outcomes, served as inputs to an economic analysis. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban were cost-effective options. Along the cost-effectiveness frontier, in relation to clinically dosed warfarin, pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £13,226 and £20,671 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. On the basis of our simulations, apixaban appears to be the most cost-effective treatment.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Drug Dosage Calculations; Humans; Morpholines; Pharmacogenetics; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Four new oral anticoagulants compare favourably with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, the balance between efficacy and safety in subgroups needs better definition. We aimed to assess the relative benefit of new oral anticoagulants in key subgroups, and the effects on important secondary outcomes.. We searched Medline from Jan 1, 2009, to Nov 19, 2013, limiting searches to phase 3, randomised trials of patients with atrial fibrillation who were randomised to receive new oral anticoagulants or warfarin, and trials in which both efficacy and safety outcomes were reported. We did a prespecified meta-analysis of all 71,683 participants included in the RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trials. The main outcomes were stroke and systemic embolic events, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for each outcome. We did subgroup analyses to assess whether differences in patient and trial characteristics affected outcomes. We used a random-effects model to compare pooled outcomes and tested for heterogeneity.. 42,411 participants received a new oral anticoagulant and 29,272 participants received warfarin. New oral anticoagulants significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolic events by 19% compared with warfarin (RR 0·81, 95% CI 0·73-0·91; p<0·0001), mainly driven by a reduction in haemorrhagic stroke (0·49, 0·38-0·64; p<0·0001). New oral anticoagulants also significantly reduced all-cause mortality (0·90, 0·85-0·95; p=0·0003) and intracranial haemorrhage (0·48, 0·39-0·59; p<0·0001), but increased gastrointestinal bleeding (1·25, 1·01-1·55; p=0·04). We noted no heterogeneity for stroke or systemic embolic events in important subgroups, but there was a greater relative reduction in major bleeding with new oral anticoagulants when the centre-based time in therapeutic range was less than 66% than when it was 66% or more (0·69, 0·59-0·81 vs 0·93, 0·76-1·13; p for interaction 0·022). Low-dose new oral anticoagulant regimens showed similar overall reductions in stroke or systemic embolic events to warfarin (1·03, 0·84-1·27; p=0·74), and a more favourable bleeding profile (0·65, 0·43-1·00; p=0·05), but significantly more ischaemic strokes (1·28, 1·02-1·60; p=0·045).. This meta-analysis is the first to include data for all four new oral anticoagulants studied in the pivotal phase 3 clinical trials for stroke prevention or systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. New oral anticoagulants had a favourable risk-benefit profile, with significant reductions in stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality, and with similar major bleeding as for warfarin, but increased gastrointestinal bleeding. The relative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants was consistent across a wide range of patients. Our findings offer clinicians a more comprehensive picture of the new oral anticoagulants as a therapeutic option to reduce the risk of stroke in this patient population.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although highly effective, warfarin use is complicated by its unpredictable narrow therapeutic window, genetic heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response, numerous food and drug interactions, and the need for regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Currently, several novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) drugs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) are available on the market as alternatives to warfarin. These agents all feature more predictable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties than warfarin. Additionally, the NOACs do not require routine monitoring of coagulation parameters, and have a relatively lower potential for interactions with drug, herb, and dietary constituents, which enhances the convenience of management for both patients and health professionals alike. However, there are other considerations regarding the use of NOACs that must be taken into account during management of therapy. In contrast to warfarin, most NOACs need dosage adjustments in renal impairment and are contraindicated in severe liver impairment, and there are no specific antidotes for treating NOAC-related over-anticoagulation. The more frequent dosing needed for NOACs may reduce adherence, especially in elderly patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, NOACs, especially dabigatran, are not as well tolerated as warfarin in patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Overall, the availability of the NOACs has expanded the treatment armamentarium, but they are not without risk. Given the limited experience with the NOACs, their limited range of indications, and their cost, the characteristics of each anticoagulant must be carefully considered to carefully select the agent that will provide the optimal risk/benefit profile in the individual patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Complementary Therapies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

During the past four years the phase III trials on stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation and on treatment of venous thromboembolism have been completed for four new oral anticoagulants - dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The studies have revealed advantages in terms of a reduced risk of bleeding, most importantly of intracranial bleeding. These anticoagulants also have favourable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. There are, however, some differences between the drugs in certain subsets of patients, according to patient characteristics or to indication for treatment. These features are reviewed here. The management of patients in association with invasive procedures or major bleeding is also discussed. Finally, a strategy of how to select patients for warfarin or the new anticoagulants and thereafter possibly also among the latter is outlined.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Warfarin's time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) is highly variable among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of variations in wafarin's TTR on rates of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings among NVAF patients in the ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, and RE-LY trials. Additionally, differences in medical costs for clinical endpoints when novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were used instead of warfarin at different TTR values were estimated. Quartile ranges of TTR values and corresponding event rates (%/patient - year = %/py) of SSE and major bleedings among NVAF patients treated with warfarin were estimated from published literature and FDA documents. The associations of SSE and major bleeding rates with TTR values were evaluated by regression analysis and then the calculated regression coefficients were used in analysis of medical cost differences associated with use of each NOAC versus warfarin (2010 costs; US payer perspective) at different TTRs. Each 10 % increase in warfarin's TTR correlated with a -0.32%/py decrease in SSE rate (R(2) = 0.61; p < 0.001). Although, the rate of major bleedings decreased as TTR increased, it was not significant (-0.035%/py, p = 0.63). As warfarin's TTR increased from 30 to 90% the estimated medical cost decreased from -$902 to -$83 for apixaban, from -$506 to +$314 for rivaroxaban, and from -$596 to +$223 for dabigatran. Among NVAF patients there is a significant negative correlation between warfarin's TTR and SSE rate, but not major bleedings. The variations in warfarin's TTR impacted the economic comparison of use of individual NOACs versus warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Costs and Cost Analysis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. In 2050, it is estimated that there will be 72 million AF patients in Asia, accounting for almost 2.9 million patients suffering from AF-associated stroke. Asian AF patients share similar risk factor profiles as non-Asians, except that more Asians have a history of previous stroke. Clinical challenges are evident in the field of stroke prevention in AF, amongst Asians. Existing stroke and bleeding risk scores have not been well-validated in Asians. Asians are prone to bleeding when treated with warfarin, and the optimal international normalised ratio (INR) for warfarin use is yet to be determined in Asians, though Asian physicians tend to keep it in a lower range (e.g. INR 1.6-2.6) for elderly patients despite limited evidence to justify this. In general, warfarin is 'difficult' to use in Asians due to higher risk of bleeding and higher stroke rate in Asians than in non-Asians, as shown in randomised controlled trials. Excess of bleeding was not found in Asians when novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were used. Besides, the superiority of NOACs to warfarin in reducing thromboembolism was maintained in Asians. Therefore NOACs are preferentially indicated in Asians in terms of both efficacy and safety. Also, some preliminary data suggest that Asian patients with AF might not be the same. Future prospective randomised trials are needed for the selection of NOACs according to different ethnic background.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor and 2 factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) approved for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Published data suggest that all 3 agents are at least as efficacious as dose‑adjusted warfarin in stroke prevention. Because of their greater specificity, rapid onset of action, and predictable pharmacokinetics, TSOACs have some advantages over vitamin K antagonists, which facilitates their use in clinical practice. The current review addresses the practical questions relating to the use of TSOACs in AF patients based on the available data and personal experience. We discuss topics such as patient selection, renal impairment, drug interactions, switching between anticoagulants, laboratory monitoring, and the risk of bleeding along with its management. We will focus on the aspects of the optimization of treatment with TSOACs in stroke prevention. The understanding of these practical issues by clinicians and patients is of key importance for the safe and effective use of TSOACs in everyday practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in Western countries (prevalence 1-2%). Patients with AF have a 5-fold increased risk of stroke, and 15%-20% of all strokes are attributable to AF. Moreover, mortality, morbidity and economic burden from stroke complicating AF are particularly high. Thus, preventing stroke and thromboembolism is the cornerstone in AF management, with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) - warfarin as the leading drug for many years. Although warfarin is effective in stroke reduction, only 55% of eligible patients with AF received it, 28% of patients discontinue it by 1-year, rates of major bleeding are higher that 20% and patients remain in the therapeutic range (INR 2-3) only 58% of the time. Warfarin underuse results from its pharmacological properties including: genetic variability in metabolism, multiple drug and food interactions, unpredictable anticoagulant effects, narrow therapeutic window, and the resulting need for inconvenient monitoring. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel was found to be less effective than warfarin. Hence, new treatments were recently evaluated for AF-related stroke and thromboembolic prevention including: direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran etexilate), oral selective factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Some of these drugs have demonstrated promising results in clinical studies, they are convenient to use and do not require monitoring. The downsides are lack of antidotes or specific blood assays to monitor the anticoagulant effect and the need for invasive procedure for installation. Herein, we review the new treatments and the available clinical evidence for their use in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation is the most-important intervention to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite a lower point prevalence of AF in Asian communities and Asian countries than in other populations, individuals of Asian ethnicity are at a disproportionately high risk of stroke and have greater consequent mortality. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists are conventionally used for anticoagulation, and demonstrably reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with AF. The use of warfarin in Asian countries is suboptimal, primarily owing to the universal challenge of achieving controlled anticoagulation with an unpredictable drug as well as concerns about the particularly high-risk of haemorrhage in Asian patients. Instead, antiplatelet therapy has been favoured in Asian communities, this strategy is neither safe nor effective for stroke prevention in these individuals. The non-vitamin K antagonist, oral anticoagulant drugs offer a solution to this challenge. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have demonstrated noninferiority to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in international, randomized, controlled trials. Importantly, some of these drugs are also associated with a significantly lower incidence of major haemorrhage, and all result in lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage and haemorrhagic stroke than warfarin. In this article, we review the use of the non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in the management of AF in Asian populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Incidence; Prevalence; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Chronic anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) prevents ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) but dose adjustment, coagulation monitoring and bleeding limits its use. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are under investigation as potential alternatives.. To assess (1) the comparative efficacy of long-term anticoagulation using DTIs versus VKAs on vascular deaths and ischaemic events in people with non-valvular AF, and (2) the comparative safety of chronic anticoagulation using DTIs versus VKAs on (a) fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events including haemorrhagic strokes, (b) adverse events other than bleeding and ischaemic events that lead to treatment discontinuation and (c) all-cause mortality in people with non-valvular AF.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (July 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, May 2013), MEDLINE (1950 to July 2013), EMBASE (1980 to October 2013), LILACS (1982 to October 2013) and trials registers (September 2013). We also searched the websites of clinical trials and pharmaceutical companies and handsearched the reference lists of articles and conference proceedings.. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DTIs versus VKAs for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in people with non-valvular AF.. All three review authors independently performed data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Primary analyses compared all DTIs combined versus warfarin. We performed post hoc analyses excluding ximelagatran because this drug was withdrawn from the market owing to safety concerns.. We included eight studies involving a total of 27,557 participants with non-valvular AF and one or more risk factors for stroke; 26,601 of them were assigned to standard doses groups and included in the primary analysis. The DTIs: dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily (three studies, 12,355 participants), AZD0837 300 mg once per day (two studies, 233 participants) and ximelagatran 36 mg twice per day (three studies, 3726 participants) were compared with the VKA warfarin (10,287 participants). Overall risk of bias and statistical heterogeneity of the studies included were low.The odds of vascular death and ischaemic events were not significantly different between all DTIs and warfarin (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.05). Sensitivity analysis by dose of dabigatran on reduction in ischaemic events and vascular mortality indicated that dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin although the effect estimate was of borderline statistical significance (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). Sensitivity analyses by other factors did not alter the results. Fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events, including haemorrhagic strokes, were less frequent with the DTIs (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97). Adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment were significantly more frequent with the DTIs (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.61). All-cause mortality was similar between DTIs and warfarin (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.01).. DTIs were as efficacious as VKAs for the composite outcome of vascular death and ischaemic events and only the dose of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was found to be superior to warfarin. DTIs were associated with fewer major haemorrhagic events, including haemorrhagic strokes. Adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment occurred more frequently with the DTIs. We detected no difference in death from all causes.

Topics: Amidines; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Published data on the association between vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)-1639G > A polymorphism and warfarin dose requirement are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed.. Studies were identified in English-language articles by search of PubMed and Embase database (inception to July 2013). A total of 32 prospective clinical trials involving 5005 patients were identified and included for analysis. Overall, the weighted mean maintenance dosage of warfarin in patients with the -1639AA genotype decreased 2.62 mg/d compared with that in the -1639GG genotype patients (95% CI -3.10 to -2.14; P < 0.00001) when 24 eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Furthermore, significantly lower warfarin dose requirement was found in patients with GA genotype versus GG genotype (WMD, -1.32; 95% CI -1.67 to -0.96; P < 0.00001). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, statistically significant lower maintenance dosage of warfarin in patients with the AA genotype versus GG genotype were found in both Caucasians (WMD, -2.47; 95% CI -2.92 to -2.03; P < 0.00001) and Asians (WMD, -2.84; 95% CI -4.57 to -1.11; P = 0.001).. This meta-analysis indicated that the VKORC1-1639G > A genetic polymorphism is associated with the variation of interindividual warfarin dose requirement in different ethnic populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Genetic Markers; Genotype; Humans; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin; White People

Anticoagulation therapy is one of the most important advances in modern medicine, saving thousands of lives from the complications of atrial fibrillation and mechanical heart valves and preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. Warfarin and heparins have been the predominant anticoagulants used until the past decade. However, the arrival of newer target-specific anticoagulants has brought us easier and equally effective agents, although no specific antidotes are yet available. Being relatively newer drugs, physicians need to be familiar with the various practical issues that may be encountered with the prescription of these drugs, which are summarised in this review.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin reduces stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, its narrow therapeutic index and need for chronic monitoring are barriers to its optimal utilization in many patients. The recent introduction of 3 novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), as alternatives to warfarin, may change the eligibility and management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who require systemic anticoagulation.. To summarize contemporary indications for anticoagulation in NVAF, and to help provide patient-centered clinical decision making for selecting warfarin or 1 of the NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) based on randomized trials and mechanistic data for each drug.. The primary clinical outcome trials of warfarin and the NOACs, pharmacologic studies, and briefing documents from the US Food and Drug Administration were reviewed.. In randomized trials, NOACs were consistently noninferior to warfarin for reducing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with NVAF, with reductions in intracranial bleeding as well. However, NOACs have several important drug-drug interactions, exclusion criteria for specific patient subgroups (eg, severe renal disease), and each medication may have a different impact on other clinical outcomes such as myocardial infarction or gastrointestinal bleeding. Benefits of the new drugs are particularly pronounced when international normalized ratio levels on warfarin are labile.. Warfarin continues to play an important role in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in NVAF. Among selected patients, the use of NOACs provides equal or superior benefit, without the need for chronic anticoagulation monitoring or ongoing dose titration.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Patient-Centered Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke, which is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate or high risk of stroke, estimated by established criteria, improves outcomes. However, to ensure that the benefits exceed the risks of bleeding, appropriate patient selection is essential. Vitamin K antagonism has been the mainstay of treatment; however, newer drugs with novel mechanisms are also available. These novel oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors) obviate many of warfarin's shortcomings, and they have demonstrated safety and efficacy in large randomized trials of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, the management of patients taking warfarin or novel agents remains a clinical challenge. There are several important considerations when selecting anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation. This review will discuss the rationale for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation; risk stratification for treatment; available agents; the appropriate implementation of these agents; and additional, specific clinical considerations for treatment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which was first described in 1958, occurs in approximately one in 500 people. Patients with HCM are at an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, which is not only poorly tolerated in this population, but also increases their risk of an embolic event. The incidence of stroke in HCM patients with atrial fibrillation is approximately 21-23%. Given the high risk of stroke, antithrombotic therapy with warfarin is recommended in national guidelines. This therapy should be used without regard to other risk factors for stroke that may be present. Anticoagulation with the new oral anticoagulants may be considered as an alternative; although, specific data for patients with HCM is not available. The purpose of this review is to remind practitioners of the importance of stroke prophylaxis with oral anticoagulants in this population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) face an increased risk of stroke compared with those in normal sinus rhythm. The vitamin K antagonist warfarin, available for over half a century, is highly effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with AF, but it is a difficult drug to use properly. As a result, it is challenging to keep the anticoagulant effect of warfarin in the desired range. Newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that directly inhibit Factor IIa (thrombin) or Factor Xa provide reliable anticoagulation when administer in fixed oral doses without routine coagulation monitoring. This manuscript will review in detail the pivotal trials of these NOACs that led to their approval as well as comment on the factors that should influence their selection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prothrombin; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia that can potentially result in stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) like warfarin were for many decades the only oral anticoagulants available for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of stroke. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (NOACS) have been introduced that act via direct inhibition of thrombin (dabigatran) or activated factor X (edoxaban, rivaroxaban and apixaban). Unlike VKAs, these anticoagulants do not require routine INR monitoring and posses favorable pharmacological properties. NOACs act rapidly, and have a stable and predictable dose-related anticoagulant effect with few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Phase III trials comparing these agents to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF demonstrated that they are at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin. Evolution of clinical guidelines to incorporate the new anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF may result in a reduction in the incidence of AF-related strokes. Safe and effective use of these new drugs in clinical practice requires understanding of their distinct pharmacological properties.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

To assess the efficacy and safety of the new oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation by the meta-analyses performed for 5 studies ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and J-ROCKET.. The events including primary efficacy endpoint (stroke and systemic embolism), ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction were used for efficacy analysis and those including major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding were used for safety analysis. Instead of combining both doses to 1 meta-analysis, the high-dose groups of RE-LY (150 mg twice daily) and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (60 mg twice daily) were combined with the single dose studies ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, and J-ROCKET. A separate meta-analysis was done for the low-dose groups of RE-LY (110 mg twice daily) and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (30 mg twice daily).. The high-dose regimen had better performance than low dose in efficacy. In addition, low-dose regimen demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, and intracranial hemorrhage.. The new oral anticoagulants demonstrated promising alternatives to warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

In the majority of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulation is required to reduce the risk of stroke. Although vitamin K antagonists effectively reduce the risk of stroke, they have many disadvantages that limit their use. Rivaroxaban is a new once-daily oral anticoagulant that overcomes some of these limitations (i.e., no monitoring of anticoagulant effect required and fixed doses can be prescribed). In recent AF studies, rivaroxaban was reported to be at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism but with a lesser risk of fatal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. More recent data have confirmed the beneficial effects of rivaroxaban, as originally described, and irrespective of the history of previous stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes, moderate renal dysfunction or age. In the present review the authors discuss current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The main objective of this study was to obtain reliable and precise estimates for all-cause mortality, vascular mortality and bleeding mortality in patients with AF receiving a DOAC or warfarin for stroke prevention.. A meta-analysis was performed on phase 3 randomized trials that compared a DOAC with warfarin for stroke prevention in AF. Published data were pooled by use of the DerSimonian random-effect model, with revman 5.2 and comprehensive meta analysis software version 2. The results were presented as risk ratios (RRs), absolute risk reduction (ARR), and number-needed-to-treat (NNT).. A total of 71 683 patients were included in this meta-analysis from four randomized controlled trials (median patient follow-up: 1.8-2.8 years) that compared a DOAC with warfarin for stroke prevention in AF. As compared with warfarin, DOACs significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.94; ARR 0.76%, 95% CI 0.39-1.13%; NNT = 132), vascular mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94; ARR 0.53%, 95% CI 0.23-0.83%; NNT = 189), and bleeding mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.67; ARR 0.32%, 95% CI 0.21-0.43%; NNT = 313).. As compared with warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF, DOACs significantly reduce all-cause mortality, vascular mortality, and bleeding mortality. This mortality benefit appears to be driven by the reduction in vascular-related and bleeding-related mortality, which, in turn, may be related to the reduction in intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

For a long time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only available oral anticoagulants for clinical use. It is conceivable that the number of patients treated with novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOAC) will increase, due to the easy handling and the favorable risk-benefit profile compared with VKA. It is, therefore, expected that clinicians will be increasingly confronted with the question on how to treat acute ischemic stroke (AIS) if there is an indication for thrombolysis or how to manage intracranial bleedings.. In this review, we discuss controversies on thrombolysis in patients anticoagulated with NOAC, the dilemma of when to restart anticoagulation after AIS, and whether (and when) to re-institute oral anticoagulation after a brain hemorrhage. We provide suggestions for the management of these situations.. Thrombolysis for patients with ischemic stroke who were given warfarin at subtherapeutic International normalized ratio values (≤ 1.7) may be considered according to guideline. Thrombolysis is contraindicated if intake of NOAC is reported in a patient, but no other information is available on-time of last intake of NOAC. Prothrombin complex concentrate have been proposed as a plausible, but unproven therapy to reverse the anticoagulant effects of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Decision makers use models to assist in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF).. We performed a search of databases through October 3, 2012 to identify pharmacologic SPAF cost-effectiveness models.. Of 30 identified models, 28 included warfarin, but only 60% assessed the impact of warfarin control on conclusions. Aspirin, dual antiplatelet, and newer anticoagulants were included in 41%, 10%, and 63% of models, respectively. Models used similar structures but included varying health states and made varying assumptions. They rarely reported performing a literature search to identify anticoagulant-specific inputs and used similar and older sources. Sixteen models used a lone randomized trial to reflect the efficacy and safety of main comparisons. One-third of models claimed a societal perspective; however, none included indirect costs. Patients typically initiated anticoagulation in the sixth or seventh decade of life and are followed for their lifetimes. Almost 70% of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were below reported willingness-to-pay thresholds. All used deterministic sensitivity analyses and 77% conducted Monte Carlo simulation. Less than half of the models were rated "high quality," yet were frequently published in high-impact journals.. Pharmacologic SPAF cost-effectiveness models have been extensively reported, but many may have flaws giving reason for decision makers to use caution. We provide 10 recommendations to avoid common flaws in SPAF cost-effectiveness models.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Models, Economic; Publishing; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) remains the mainstay for prevention of ischaemic stroke in atrial fibrillation. This article reviews the latest evidence and development of new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of ischaemic stroke, as well as bleeding risk assessment, mitigation and management.. Decision-making for stroke prevention has evolved towards the initial identification of 'low-risk' patients who do not need any antithrombotic therapy. Subsequent to this step, patients with at least 1 stroke risk factor can be offered effective stroke prevention, which is OAC. There is increased morbidity and mortality amongst warfarin users, if time in therapeutic range is poor. New oral anticoagulants (such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) offer relative efficacy, safety and convenience compared to warfarin, in relation to stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Bleeding risk can be assessed by HAS-BLED score, whereas the new SAMe-TT2R2 score can predict the patient's suitability for vitamin K antagonists.. The landscape for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation has greatly changed. It is no longer a question of 'if we treat' but more of 'how to treat', as the presence of one or more stroke risk factors in atrial fibrillation confers a risk of fatal and devastating strokes. OAC use, whether as well controlled vitamin K antagonists or nonvitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulant, will reduce the burden of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Heparin; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is the most widely used oral anticoagulant in the world. It is cheap and effective, but its use is limited in many patients by unpredictable levels of anticoagulation, which increases the risk of thromboembolic or haemorrhagic complications. It also requires regular blood monitoring and dose adjustment. New classes of drugs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), are now supported as alternatives to warfarin. Three NOACs are licensed: dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, antagonists of factor Xa. NOACs do not require routine blood monitoring or dose adjustment. They have a rapid onset and offset of action and fewer food and drug interactions. Current indications include treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and prevention of cardioembolic disease in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Effective antidotes are lacking and some caution must be used in severe renal impairment, but favourable trial evidence has led to their widespread adoption. Research is ongoing, and an increase in their use and indications is expected in the coming years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin has remained the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for the past 60 years. Recently, two new groups of novel oral anticoagulants- direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have shown promising results in well conducted clinical trials in terms of efficacy, safety and convenience of usage. However, in real world practice these novel agents come with their share of side effects and drawbacks which the prescribing physician must be aware about. In this review we discuss the role of these novel agents in real world clinical practice - their advantages, disadvantages and future directions.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Discovery; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Anticoagulants are recommended for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Warfarin has been the most common oral anticoagulant for several decades, but use of warfarin has many limitations. Recently, several novel anticoagulants that can overcome the limitations of warfarin have been developed, and some of them are already used in clinical practice in Japan. In this review, we overview the pharmacological mechanisms and the results of the phase III trial of the novel anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF based on the comparison to warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Anticoagulants are effective at preventing and treating thrombosis, but can cause bleeding. For decades, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the only available oral anticoagulants. The development of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which inhibit either factor Xa or thrombin stoichiometrically, has provided alternatives to VKAs for several indications. The results of recent large-scale randomised controlled trials comparing NOACs with VKAs for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) have produced some unexpected results. As a group, NOACs showed similar efficacy as warfarin, but a reduced risk of major bleeding. The reduction in bleeding with NOACs was greatest with intracranial hemorrhage. In contrast, the relative risk of gastro-intestinal bleeding was increased with some NOACs. In this review, we explore the potential mechanisms as well as the implications of these organ-specific bleeding patterns.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Endothelium, Vascular; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intestinal Absorption; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Organ Specificity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Thromboplastin; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) commonly occur together. Previous consensus guidelines were published before the wide availability of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and newer P2Y12 antiplatelet agents. We examine recent evidence to guide management in 3 categories of patients with AF and CHD: patients with stable CHD, nonstented patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, and patients with a coronary stent requiring dual-antiplatelet therapy.. We conducted a literature search by evaluation of PubMed and other data sources including international meeting reports. We critically reviewed recent clinical trial and relevant registry evidence to update European and US consensus documents.. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin or NOACs is required to prevent embolic stroke in AF, and antiplatelet therapy is insufficient for this purpose. Antiplatelet therapy using monotherapy with aspirin is the standard of care in stable CHD. Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel or a new P2Y12 inhibitor (dual-antiplatelet therapy) is needed to reduce coronary events after an acute coronary syndrome or after percutaneous coronary intervention. Combinations of these agents increase the risk of bleeding, and limited clinical trial evidence suggests that withdrawal of aspirin may reduce bleeding without increasing coronary events.. Available clinical trials and registries provide remarkably little evidence to guide difficult clinical decision making in patients with combined AF and CHD. In patients on triple antithrombotic therapy with vitamin K antagonists, aspirin, and clopidogrel, a single clinical trial indicates that withdrawal of aspirin may reduce bleeding risk without increasing the risk of coronary thrombosis. It is unclear whether this evidence applies to combinations of NOACs and newer P2Y12 inhibitors. Clinical trials of combinations of the newer antithrombotic agents are urgently needed to guide clinical care.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are at risk for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), and this risk can be decreased with adjusted-dose warfarin. Warfarin, however, is cumbersome to use and requires at least monthly laboratory monitoring. Three new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are less cumbersome have been approved as alternatives to warfarin for SSE prevention in NVAF. Selecting a patient-specific alternative to warfarin can be confusing for pharmacists and clinicians. This review details clinical parameters to consider when choosing an alternative to warfarin for a specific patient and summarizes them in a Comparison Table.. Using available clinical evidence from pivotal trials, US FDA- and Health Canada-approved prescribing information and post-marketing observations, this review provides a summary of important clinical variables for clinicians to consider when choosing patient-centred anticoagulant alternatives to warfarin for prevention of SSE in NVAF.. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved alternatives to warfarin for primary and secondary prevention of SSE in patients with NVAF. Additionally, apixaban has also been compared to aspirin in patients with NVAF that were considered unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. Prospective consideration of age, weight, hepatic function, renal function and drug interactions are important clinical parameters to consider when selecting patient-centred alternatives to adjusted-dose warfarin.. Several NOACs are now alternatives to warfarin for SSE prevention in NVAF but require providers to make a shift in strategy from tailoring anticoagulant dose based on anticoagulant effect to selection of the anticoagulant based on clinical variables that affect anticoagulant exposure. These variables and their interactions should be considered in choosing an alternative to warfarin and are summarized in a simple table comparing the new anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Humans; Patient-Centered Care; Stroke; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation are among the most common cardiovascular disorders in the United States. For over 50 years, the standard of care has been anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. However, the numerous limitations of vitamin K antagonists led to the development of target-specific oral anticoagulants. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This article compares the basic pharmacologic properties of these anticoagulants, reviews the data supporting their use, and discusses practical clinical issues including measurement of the anticoagulation effect, reversal strategies, and management of patients prior to surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Until about 4 years ago, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulant approved in the United States, and switching between oral anticoagulants has become an option since the emergence of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. What are the reasons one may switch between the agents and how is this done? Discussed in this article are the 4 agents approved in the United States, their characteristics, reasons one may switch, and methods for conversion. After a thorough search of original trial data and recent expert review articles, we have summarized the most recent recommendations below and briefly discuss upcoming oral anticoagulants that show promise.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; United States; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation is one of the most important risk factor for embolic cerebral infarcts. Besides vitamin K antagonists, recently developed novel oral anticoagulants are gaining an increasing role in its treatment. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are novel oral anticoagulants available in the routine clinical practice. This review summarizes their use and the corresponding guidelines in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, by answering questions raised in relation of a hypothetical case report.. A nem valvularis eredetű pitvarfibrilláció az embóliás agyi infarktusok egyik legfontosabb kockázati tényezője. Kezelésében a K-vitamin-antagonisták mellett az elmúlt években megjelenő új típusú orális antikoagulánsok egyre nagyobb teret kapnak. A dabigatran, a rivaroxaban és az apixaban a klinikai gyakorlatban elérhető új típusú orális antikoagulánsok. Az összefoglaló ezek alkalmazásának irányelveit, tulajdonságaikat tekinti át ischaemiás stroke szekunder prevenciójában, hipotetikus esetismertetés kapcsán felmerülő kérdéseket tárgyalva. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(42), 1655–1660.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To compare key features of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban-and to address questions that arise when comparing the NOACs.. PubMed was searched for recent (January 2008 to week 32 of 2013) clinical studies relating to NOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE).. All NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF, and are at least as safe in terms of bleeding risk according to 3 large trials. Meta-analyses of these trials have shown that, compared with warfarin therapy, NOACs reduced total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and intracranial bleeding, and there was a trend toward less overall bleeding. Practical advantages of NOACs over warfarin include fixed once- or twice-daily oral dosing without the need for coagulation monitoring, and few known or defined drug or food interactions. Potential drawbacks of NOACs include a risk of bleeding that might be increased in patients older than 75 years, increased major gastrointestinal bleeding with high-dose dabigatran, increased dyspepsia with dabigatran, the lack of a routine laboratory test to reliably measure anticoagulant effect, and the lack of an antidote for reversal. No direct comparisons of NOACs have been made in randomized controlled trials, and the choice of NOAC is influenced by individual patient characteristics, including risk of stroke or VTE, risk of bleeding, and comorbidity (eg, renal dysfunction).. The NOACs represent important alternatives in the management of patients with AF and VTE, especially for patients who have difficulty accessing regular coagulation monitoring. The companion to this article addresses common "what if" questions that arise in the long-term clinical follow-up and management of patients receiving NOACs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Family Practice; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke and death by an embolus formed in the left atrium. Thrombus formation over the endocardium of the left atrial appendage is caused by a reduction of physiological coagulation inhibitors, such as thrombomodulin, in patients with AF. Therefore, prevention with anticoagulants is important, with warfarin treatment routinely given. Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), a direct thrombin inhibitor (TDI), and factor Xa inhibitors (Xa-INHs) have been used for prevention in place of warfarin. However, since the half-life of NOACs is short, there are peak and trough plasma concentrations. Thus, even though thrombin formation is adequately controlled at the peak in NOAC therapy, such formation may occur at the trough, increasing the risk of thrombosis. TDI inhibits the amplification phase and Xa-INHs inhibit the propagation phase (prothrombinase complex) of the coagulation reaction, resulting in the control of thrombin bursts. In a meta-analysis of NOACs vs. warfarin treatment, the former significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolic events by 19% as compared with warfarin, mainly driven by a reduction in hemorrhagic stroke, while their administration also significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 10% and intracranial hemorrhage by 52%. Although frequent monitoring is not necessary in NOAC therapy, some clinical examinations for determining the effect and bleeding risk are required, as it was recently reported that some patients with AF who received NOAC therapy experience cerebral infarction or serious bleeding.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation, the commonest cardiac arrhythmia, predisposes to thrombus formation and consequently increases risk of ischaemic stroke. Recent years have seen approval of a number of novel oral anticoagulants. Nevertheless, warfarin and aspirin remain the mainstays of therapy. It is widely appreciated that both these agents increase the likelihood of bleeding: there is a popular conception that this risk is greater with warfarin. In fact, well-managed warfarin therapy (INR 2-3) has little effect on bleeding risk and is twice as effective as aspirin at preventing stroke. Patients with atrial fibrillation and a further risk factor for stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc >0) should therefore either receive warfarin or a novel oral agent. The remainder who are at the very lowest risk of stroke are better not prescribed antithrombotic therapy. For stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; aspirin is rarely the right choice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

The majority of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) will require anticoagulation therapy for reducing the risk of stroke, the most devastating complication of AF. Although traditionally vitamin K antagonists have been used for this purpose, they have important limitations that interfere with their use in clinical practice. Different clinical trials have shown the benefits of new oral anticoagulants over warfarin, but patients included in the ROCKET-AF trial were found to be at a higher risk of AF-related complications. Moreover, rivaroxaban has been proven to be effective and safe in patients with AF and moderate renal dysfunction as well as in those with ischemic heart disease. Rivaroxaban is taken only once daily; this may improve medication adherence and, secondarily, it provides a higher protection and reduction in the risk of stroke. This article provides an extensive review of the available evidence about rivaroxaban, with a special focus on nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Oral vitamin K antagonists are highly efficacious in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Optimal use of these agents in clinical practice is challenged by their narrow therapeutic window. The proportion of time spent in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) range of 2.0-3.0 [time in the therapeutic range (TTR)] has been closely associated with adverse outcomes, i.e., stroke, hemorrhage, mortality. Although TTR is a validated marker, it has several limitations. TTR does not capture short-term risks associated with highly variable periods or periods characterized by extreme deviations in INR. Because TTR measurement is limited to consecutive periods of warfarin exposure, it does not inform the risks associated with gap periods of 56 days or greater as these time intervals are excluded from end-point rate calculations. Because individuals with gaps in monitoring represent a different patient population than those without gaps, e.g., less adherent, more acutely ill, more frequent transitions in health status, TTR analyses are likely most valid and informative for individuals with uninterrupted monitoring of the INR. Duration of warfarin therapy and patient-specific factors have also been shown to influence TTR. Younger age, female sex, lower income, black race, frequent hospitalizations, polypharmacy, active cancer, decompensated heart failure, substance abuse, psychiatric disorders, dementia, and chronic liver disease have all been associated with lower TTR. Targeted strategies to improve TTR are urgently needed.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Chronic Disease; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Liver Diseases; Male; Neoplasms; Sex Factors; Stroke; Substance-Related Disorders; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (OACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, are available alternative anticoagulant therapy to vitamin K antagonists. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the treatment of appropriate patients for specific clinical indications. Therapeutic advantages of prescribing the new OACs are related to their predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have all been shown to be noninferior to warfarin treatment for stroke prevention in respective phase 3 clinical trials; dabigatran and apixaban were shown to be superior to warfarin as preventive therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are all approved agents for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States and Europe. Among these agents, rivaroxaban is the only FDA-approved drug for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. This article reviews the major clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of the new OACs and the use of these agents in special clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Europe; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia occurring in patients in the United States. The primary clinical consequence of AF is an increase in the risk and severity of strokes. Treatment guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for most patients with AF. One risk-stratification scheme, the CHADS2 index, is simple and widely used to determine the management of patients with AF in regard to stroke prevention. However, new schemes, such as CHA2DS2-VASc, further refine risk stratification to identify patients who would obtain a net clinical benefit from a particular management strategy, thus improving the quality of management. For patients with AF for whom oral anticoagulation (OAC) is advisable, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy is well established and effective. However, OAC with VKAs presents challenges to prescribers and patients in maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Novel OACs may offer alternatives to VKAs. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2010 for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. The activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitor rivaroxaban was recently approved by the FDA both for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, which may lead to pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, and for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. Apixaban, another factor Xa inhibitor, was recently shown to be effective for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. This article reviews clinical considerations regarding new agents that may offer alternatives to VKA therapy for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) face an elevated risk of stroke compared with patients who have normal sinus rhythm. Warfarin, an oral vitamin K antagonist, is a highly effective therapeutic agent to reduce stroke risk in patients with AF; however, use of warfarin is complicated by variable patient dose response due to genetic factors and multiple food-drug and drug-drug interactions. Novel oral anticoagulants appear to be a safe, effective alternative to warfarin therapy without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been commercially available since 2010 for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. More recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 2 oral activated factor X inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, for stroke prevention in patients with AF based on clinical trial evidence of their safety and efficacy. In this article, we provide an overview of the 3 novel oral anticoagulants for treating patients with AF and discuss the latest findings from subgroup analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

For > 50 years, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral drugs for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban) have completed phase 3 clinical trials for the same indications. The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2012. In this article, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of the new oral anticoagulants. We focus primarily on the balance between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk and the implications of such risks in clinical practice. Bleeding and thromboembolic risk estimation tools and their roles in the correct utilization of new oral anticoagulation are also discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Although oral anticoagulants (OACs) are highly effective in reducing stroke risk in atrial fibrillation, some patients still sustain stroke despite being on an OAC. Our aim was to identify the risk factors that contribute to stroke risk in atrial fibrillation, although patients were taking OACs in a clinical trial setting.. We identified contemporary clinical trials that investigated OACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. Event rates per year from each study and pooled event rates and relative risks, all with a 95% confidence interval, were calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) test.. Six trials were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 58 883 patients randomized. Characteristics associated with a higher relative risk of stroke while on an OAC included age ≥ 75 years (relative risk, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.69]), female sex (1.30 [1.15-1.49]), previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (1.85 [1.32-2.60]), vitamin K-antagonist naive status (for vitamin K antagonist experienced, 0.85 [0.74-0.97]), moderate and severe renal impairment (1.54 [1.30-1.81] and 2.22 [1.85-2.66], respectively, compared with normal renal function), previous aspirin use (1.19 [1.04-1.37]), Asian race (1.70 [1.42-2.03]), and a CHADS2 score of ≥ 3 (1.64 [1.18-2.27]).. Stroke rates are higher on OACs with some patient clinical characteristics, that is, older age, female sex, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, vitamin K-antagonist naive status, renal impairment, previous aspirin use, and higher CHADS2 score. The identified risk factors for stroke while on an OAC could potentially be used to consider a risk assessment tool to flag up high-risk patients while on an OAC (in this case, warfarin). Whether these risk factors apply to novel OACs is uncertain.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is higher in haemodialysis (HD) population than general population. AF is associated with higher morbidity and mortality than sinus rhythm in this population. The purpose of this review is to summarize all available evidence regarding use of warfarin in HD patients with AF for stroke prevention. The enormous heterogeneity of available studies does not allow pooling of the data in the form of meta-analysis or systematic review. Current evidence regarding use of warfarin for AF in terms of risk benefit ratio in this population is limited and conflicting. Randomized control trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in this population by means of risk/benefit assessment tools are urgently needed. However, suitable HD patients with AF should be counselled on their likelihood of reduction of stroke risk and experiencing side-effects before initiating anticoagulant therapy. It is particularly important to incorporate the patient's preferences and willingness to trade off benefit and risk in stroke prevention. An individualized holistic approach optimizing all potential risk factors of bleeding and ischemic stroke in HD patients with AF is recommended.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Prevalence; Renal Dialysis; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and ischemic stroke are collectively associated with annual hospital costs of tens of billions of dollars in the USA. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment with warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in patients with NVAF. Unfortunately, because of the complexity of warfarin therapy and potential for adverse events (AEs), many patients who might benefit go untreated or receive suboptimal therapy, increasing their stroke and/or bleeding risk.. This review explores current hospital costs and resource utilization for NVAF patients on warfarin therapy and the potential impact of newer OACs in this area.. Many ischemic strokes could be prevented through wider use of OACs. Further, admissions due to anticoagulant-associated AEs could be reduced by optimizing OAC therapy. In the hospital, specialized anticoagulation services can decrease costs by improving the effectiveness of warfarin management, empowering patients through education and optimizing care transitions. With fewer interactions and no dose titration or monitoring required, the novel OACs (NOACs) have the potential to further decrease inpatient resource utilization and costs. It is important that, as data become available, inpatient costs are included in cost-benefit comparisons between warfarin and the NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Monitoring; Hospital Costs; Humans; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

For the last decades vitamin K antagonists have been the most effective anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation. New molecules are being designed, mainly due to the great amount of disadvantages in the management of conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban will soon be available as an alternative to warfarin/acenocumarol. All of them have demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, with even dabigatran 150 mg bid and apixaban being superior. They have also a lower risk of bleeding, especially regarding severe/fatal and intracranial hemorrhages. This is a real revolution. The advance of these new anticoagulants will be limited only by the higher cost, and will progressively become the protagonists of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Dabigatran was the first of a new generation of anticoagulation drugs for the indication of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) to be approved. Evidence show that dabigatran 150 mg twice daily significantly reduces the risk of stroke and systemic embolism (RR = 0.65; p < 0.001) and shows a comparable rate of major bleedings (RR = 0.93; p = 0.32), whereas dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was associated with a comparable rate of stroke and systemic embolism (RR = 0.90; p = 0.30) and a significantly lower rate of major bleedings compared to warfarin treatment (RR = 0.80; p = 0.003). The purpose is to review current economic evaluations of these alternatives for healthcare professionals to include these findings in their decision-making.. A systematic literature search identified 43 economic evaluations, of which 10 were included and evaluated according to the Consensus Health Economic Criteria list (CHEC-list) and the Oxford model.. Six economic evaluations concluded that dabigatran was a cost-effective alternative to warfarin. One evaluation concluded the same except when quality in warfarin treatment was excellent, with a mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) > 73%. Three evaluations concluded that dabigatran was a cost-effective alternative to warfarin in patient sub-groups; TTR ≤ 64%, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (CHADS2 score) ≥3, or a CHADS2 score = 2 unless international normalized ratio (INR) control was excellent, and with high risk of stroke or in a low-quality warfarin treatment. Dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was in general dominated by dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.. The evaluations were not fully homogeneous, as some did not include loss of productivity, costs of dyspepsia, and annual costs of dabigatran patient management.. In the majority of the economic evaluations, dabigatran is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin treatment. In some evaluations dabigatran is only cost-effective in sub-groups, such as patients with a low TTR-value in warfarin treatment and a CHADS2 score ≥2.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Warfarin

Several new generation of oral anticoagulant has been tested their safety and efficacy over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. These new generation of drugs have shown their superior safety over warfarin controlled with PT-INR 2-3. The real superiority of warfarin is the potential for individualization for the target PT-INR. Indeed, in the real world clinical setting, PT-INR is controlled relatively lower (around 2) in some countries such as Japan. In this context, superior safety profile shown in the clinical trials might not reflect in the real world clinical practice. It is important to accumulate data with the use of new generation of oral anticoagulant in the real world clinical practice. Moreover, risk factor control within daily life is much more important than anticoagulant intervention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Japan; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist, and data suggest that renal patients have AF rates in excess of double that encountered in the general population. These patients are at increased risk of stroke, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. Furthermore, a lower GFR causes increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF - independent of other risk factors. The dilemma facing clinicians treating this cohort of patients is that renal insufficiency confers both a thromboembolic and a bleeding risk. Renal disease also commonly coexists with other risk factors for stroke and bleeding such as hypertension and advanced age. Furthermore, bleeding risk tracks stroke risk and many risk factors are common to both thromboembolism and haemorrhage. Patients with severe renal impairment are also actively excluded from the majority of trials for stroke prevention in AF, including those trials which informed the development of stroke risk factor scoring schemes. Therefore, patients with renal disease and AF present a unique management challenge. The available data suggests that the benefit from warfarin in terms of stroke reduction is not as clear as in the general population, and there is an increased risk of bleeding complications and even ectopic vascular calcification. Thus, it is problematic to extrapolate the benefits of warfarin in the general population to a subgroup that has been actively excluded from clinical trials. The new oral anticoagulants have relatively little data in patients with severe renal impairment, and all have an element of renal excretion. There is a need for large randomised control trials in patients with renal insufficiency and on haemodialysis to provide a bank of high-quality scientific data on which clinicians can base their management decisions. Until then, we must adopt a pragmatic approach which involves careful consideration of the relative risk of stroke and bleeding in each individual patient.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban (Eliquis(®)) has predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and does not require routine anticoagulation monitoring. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of oral apixaban to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial in patients with AF and at least one additional risk factor for stroke, apixaban recipients were significantly less likely than warfarin recipients to experience stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding or death; the beneficial effects of treatment with apixaban versus warfarin were generally maintained across various patient subgroups. Apixaban recipients also had a significantly lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage than warfarin recipients. In the AVERROES (Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients who have Failed or are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy) trial in patients with AF and at least one additional risk factor for stroke for whom vitamin K antagonist therapy was unsuitable, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism than aspirin, without an increase in the risk of major bleeding. In conclusion, although longer-term efficacy and safety data are needed, apixaban is an important new option for use in patients with nonvalvular AF to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism.

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in older adults with a prevalence of 9 % in adults aged 80 years or older. AF patients have a five times greater risk of developing stroke than the general population. Using anticoagulants for stroke prevention in the elderly becomes a challenge because both stroke and bleeding complications increase with age. CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores are currently used as stroke and bleeding risk evaluations. When the HAS-BLED score is 3 or higher, caution and efforts to correct reversible risk factors are advised. Regardless of the HAS-BLED score, warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants are a IIa recommendation for CHA₂DS₂-VASc of 1, except for a score of 1 for females, and a IA recommendation for the score of 2 or higher. Aspirin is no longer recommended for AF thromboprophylaxis. In an elderly patient, lenient rate control is preferred over rhythm control owing to fewer adverse drugs effects and hospitalizations. When rhythm control is needed, dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic drug that can be considered in patients who have paroxysmal AF and no history of heart failure. Although less efficacious than amiodarone, dronedarone has a fewer thyroid, neurologic, dermatologic, and ocular side effects than amiodarone.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Heart; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Monitoring, Physiologic; Morpholines; Prodrugs; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Systemic thrombolysis with alteplase is the only approved medical treatment for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Thrombectomy is also increasingly used to treat proximal occlusions of the cerebral arteries, but has not shown superiority over systemic thrombolysis with alteplase. Many patients with acute ischaemic stroke are pretreated with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, which can increase the bleeding risk of thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Pretreatment with aspirin monotherapy increases the bleeding risk of alteplase in both observational and randomised trials with no effect on clinical outcome, and the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage is increased with the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel. Antiplatelet drugs should not be given in the first 24 h after alteplase treatment. Data from pooled randomised trials and a large observational study show that thrombolysis can probably be done safely in patients given vitamin-K antagonists if the international normalised ratio is less than 1·7, although bleeding risk is slightly raised. Almost no data are available for the safety of alteplase in patients with atrial fibrillation who have been given novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for stroke prevention. Some coagulation parameters could help to identify patients treated with NOAC who might be eligible for thrombolysis. Thrombectomy can be done in patients given antiplatelets and probably in those given anticoagulants; however, conclusions about anticoagulants are based on findings from observational studies with small patient numbers.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Plasminogen Activators; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Warfarin

The most significant complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) is thromboembolic stroke. Furthermore, the consequences of AF-related stroke tend to be more severe than those of other aetiologies. The need for safe, effective and convenient anticoagulation is clear. Warfarin is the current mainstay of treatment but its prescription and use remains sub-optimal, despite clear evidence and guidance to support its use. Many patients taking warfarin spend a significant amount of time subtherapeutically anticoagulated and the requirement for regular monitoring of warfarin's anticoagulant activity is both inconvenient and costly. Novel oral anticoagulants promise more predictable and convenient anticoagulation. They have potential superiority over warfarin for preventing thromboembolic stroke and appear to be associated with fewer haemorrhagic effects. Understanding the important background to the novel agents presents an opportunity to tailor anticoagulant treatment to the individual. This should allow a greater proportion of the eligible population access to effective anticoagulation. Furthermore, it should reduce their exposure to the risk of both thromboembolic and haemorrhagic stroke and their potentially devastating consequences.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Electrical cardioversions are performed to restore sinus rhythm in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation to improve symptoms. It has been known for decades that cardioversion without adequate anticoagulation for 3-4 weeks prior to and for 4 weeks after cardioversion results in thromboembolic complication of about 5%. It is much less known that cardioversion is also associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism (stroke, peripheral embolism) in patients treated with usual anticoagulation. The control arms (warfarin) of the three studies with the new anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation report a monthly thromboembolic risk of 0,13-0,2%. The risk for thromboembolic complication in the month following cardioversion is about three to six times higher than without cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with usual anticoagulation. Since most cardioversions are performed by DC shock it is not known whether electrical and pharmacological cardioversions carry the same risk for thromboembolism. Although thromboembolic complications do not often occur following cardioversion the increased risk due to this procedure should be acknowledged. Strict anticoagulation (e. g. INR value > 2,5) in the first 10-14 days following cardioversion could possibly minimize the risk of thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Phenprocoumon; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin has been the mainstay oral anticoagulant (OAC) medication prescribed for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, warfarin therapy is challenging because of marked interindividual variability in dose and response, requiring frequent monitoring and dose titration. These limitations have prompted the clinical development of new OACs (NOACs) that directly target the coagulation cascade with rapid onset/offset of action, lower risk for drug-drug interactions, and more predictable response. Recently, NOACs dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor), and rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa [FXa] inhibitors) have gained regulatory approval as alternative therapies to warfarin. Though the anticoagulation efficacy of these NOACs has been characterized, differences in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles have become a significant consideration in terms of drug selection and dosing. In this review, we outline key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of each compound and provide guidance on selection and dosing of the 3 NOACs relative to warfarin when considering OAC therapy for AF patients. Importantly, we show that by better understanding the effect of clinical variables such as age, renal function, dosing interval, and drug metabolism (CYP3A4) and transport (P-glycoprotein), we might be able to better predict the risk for sub- and supratherapeutic anticoagulation response and individualize OAC selection and dosing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Selection; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The primary objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Secondary objectives related to assessing the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants stratified by center-specific time in therapeutic range, age, and CHADS2 score.. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Analysis used a Markov cohort model that followed patients from initiation of pharmacotherapy to death. Transition probabilities were obtained from a concurrent network meta-analysis. Utility values and costs were obtained from published data. Numerous deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analysis were conducted.. The incremental cost per QALY gained for dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin was $20,797. Apixaban produced equal QALYs at a higher cost. Dabigatran 110 mg and rivaroxaban were dominated by dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. Results were sensitive to the drug costs of apixaban, the time horizon adopted, and the consequences from major and minor bleeds with dabigatran. Results varied by a center's average time in therapeutic range, a patient's CHADS2 score, and patient age, with either dabigatran 150 mg or apixaban being optimal.. Results were highly sensitive to patient characteristics. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg were unlikely to be cost-effective. For different characteristics, apixaban or dabigatran 150 mg were optimal. Thus, the choice between these two options may come down to the price of apixaban and further evidence on the impact of major and minor bleeds with dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Warfarin

Stroke is the most feared complication among patients with atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been the gold standard for stroke prevention for the past 60 years. However, VKA therapy has many downsides, including risk for bleeding, a narrow therapeutic window, and the need for frequent monitoring, as well as numerous diet and lifestyle considerations that make its use cumbersome. Thus, development of new drugs that can preserve the benefits of VKAs while eliminating the negative aspects of VKA therapy has been enthusiastically sought. This article reviews the anticoagulant agents that are clinically available or under development as alternatives to VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Given the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation, the need for safe and effective stroke prophylaxis will continue to rise. Warfarin has been around for many years and has proven efficacy in preventing stroke, but it has major limitations due to its variable dosing, food and drug interactions, and requirement for regular monitoring. Newer agents which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have recently or will soon be available and may provide an improved efficacy in stroke prevention, an improved safety profile, and improved user-friendliness. Dabigatran was the first of the agents to be widely available, and in the RE-LY study, dabigatran (150 mg dose) showed superiority to warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke and a significant reduction in intracranial bleeding. Rivaroxaban was studied in the ROCKETAF trial, and with once daily dosing, it showed noninferiority to warfarin in preventing stroke with a significant reduction in intracranial bleeding. The ARISTOTLE trial showed apixaban was superior to warfarin for stroke prevention, significantly reduced all major bleeding, and resulted in a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. While all three trials have important limitations, they were very large randomized trials with more than 14,000 patients each and show a clear overall net clinical benefit when compared with warfarin. Key features of the drugs as well as an individual's preferences and stability on warfarin will help guide the ultimate drug choice for any given patient, but these newer anticoagulant agents are likely to usher in a new era in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pakistan; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Female; Forecasting; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Isolated left ventricular noncompaction is a rare form of cardiomyopathy characterized by prominent left ventricular trabeculations and intertrabecular recesses. The typical clinical manifestations are severe systolic and diastolic dysfunction, conduction abnormalities, and cardiac embolic events theorized to result from thrombus formation within the intertrabecular recesses. Evidence-based recommendations for preventing thromboembolic events in isolated left ventricular noncompaction have not been established. We report the case of a woman who, at 10 years of age, had been diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without systolic dysfunction. At age 30, she presented with left hemiparesis consequent to a large right-hemispheric ischemic stroke, and she was diagnosed with isolated left ventricular noncompaction. In addition to discussing the patient's case, we review the medical literature that pertains to isolated left ventricular noncompaction.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Cerebral Angiography; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium; Paresis; Stroke; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists (warfarin, phenprocoumon) is effective both for primary and secondary stroke prevention yielding a 60-70% relative reduction in stroke risk compared with placebo, as well as a mortality reduction of 26 percent. Vitamin-K antagonists have a number of well documented shortcomings. Recently the results of randomised trials for three new oral anticoagulants that do not exhibit the limitations of vitamin-K antagonists have been published. These include direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). The studies (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES) provide promising results for the new agents, including higher efficacy and a significantly lower incidence of intracranial bleeds compared with warfarin or aspirin. The new drugs show similar results in secondary as well as in primary stroke prevention in patients with AF. Apixaban was demonstrated to be clearly superior to aspirin and had the same rate of major bleeding complications. Meta-analyses show that the novel anticoagulants are superior to warfarin for the reduction of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeds. New anticoagulants add to the therapeutic options for patients with AF, and offer a number of advantages over warfarin, for both the clinician and patient, including a favorable bleeding profile and convenience of use. Aspirin is no longer an option in secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Consideration of these new anticoagulants will improve clinical decision making.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have been extensively studied for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Elderly patients have the highest incidence of thrombotic complications but also have the highest risk of anticoagulant associated bleeding. In this review we critically examine the balance between risks and benefits of NOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists in elderly patients enrolled in phase 3 randomized controlled trials for the management of venous thrombosis and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Results show that the favourable balance between risks and benefits of NOACs is preserved in the elderly population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and the leading cause of stroke, an event with high human and economic burden. Novel oral anticoagulants have been approved in many markets as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF - dabigatran etexilate, apixaban and rivaroxaban. Given the high burden of AF, and given that new treatments can more effectively prevent stroke than warfarin, but at higher drug cost, there has been a need for systematic evaluation of the costs and benefits of these new treatments. In this study, we summarize the findings of a systematic literature review on the cost-effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity between the studies and their numerical findings, despite using a common set of four trials for their clinical inputs. However, there is broad consensus among them that each of the novel oral anticoagulants is cost-effective versus warfarin or aspirin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Coagulability increases during pregnancy, and thromboembolism can easily occur. Venous thromboembolism is a cause of death in pregnant women, but arterial thrombosis such as ischemic stroke in pregnancy is also not uncommon. In pharmacotherapy for thromboembolism in pregnant women, fetal toxicity and teratogenicity must be carefully considered. As anticoagulants in pregnant women, unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin are recommended, but warfarin is not recommended since it has a low molecular weight and crosses the placenta. Various types of new oral anticoagulant drugs have been available in Japan since 2011. However, the Japanese package inserts for these anticoagulants advise quite cautious administration in pregnant women. The guidelines on pregnant women include less information about antiplatelet drugs than anticoagulant drugs. Aspirin may cause teratogenicity and fetal toxicity, and perinatal mortality is increased. However, when low doses of aspirin are administered as antiplatelet therapy, the US Food and Drug Administration has assigned pregnancy category C, and treatment is relatively safe. Neurosurgeons and neurologists commonly encounter pregnant women with thromboembolism, such as ischemic stroke. Up-to-date information and correct selection of drugs are necessary in consultation with specialists in perinatal care.

Topics: Aspirin; Contraindications; Cooperative Behavior; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Labeling; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Guideline Adherence; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Interdisciplinary Communication; Japan; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Stroke; Teratogenesis; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of dabigatran in the periprocedural period for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation is not well established. We conducted a meta-analysis of the periprocedural use of dabigatran vs warfarin (with or without heparin bridging).. A literature search was performed using multiple databases. Outcomes were (1) major bleeding; (2) minor bleeding; and (3) thromboembolic events. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported for dichotomous variables.. Eleven controlled studies (9 cohorts, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 case-control study; 3841 patients) were identified. Dabigatran was used in 1463 patients, uninterrupted in 223 and held up to 36 hours in the remainder. No significant differences were noted in major bleeding rates between dabigatran and warfarin groups (1.9% vs. 1.6%; OR, 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-2.13]; P = 0.92). Cardiac tamponade was observed in 1.4% in dabigatran vs 1.1% in warfarin groups (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.55-2.11; P = 0.82). Similar rates for dabigatran vs. warfarin were reported for minor bleeding (3.8% vs. 4.5%; OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.25; P = 0.40), hematoma (2% vs. 2.7%; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-1.08; P = 0.1), and thromboembolic events (0.6% vs. 0.1%; OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.78-8.11; P = 0.12).. This meta-analysis suggests that dabigatran and warfarin have similar safety and efficacy overall for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation. Signals were seen favouring dabigatran (for hematomas) and warfarin (for thromboembolic events), but neither was statistically significant because of low event rates. More high-quality data are required to definitively compare the 2 strategies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Humans; Perioperative Care; Stroke; Warfarin

Dabigatran has been associated with greater risk of myocardial infarction (MI) than warfarin. It is unknown whether the increased risk is unique to dabigatran, an adverse effect shared by other oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), or the result of a protective effect of warfarin against MI. To address these questions, we systematically searched MEDLINE and performed a meta-analysis on randomized trials that compared oral DTIs with warfarin for any indication with end point of MIs after randomization. We furthermore performed a secondary meta-analysis on atrial fibrillation stroke prevention trials with alternative anticoagulants compared with warfarin with end point of MIs after randomization. A total of 11 trials (39,357 patients) that compared warfarin to DTIs (dabigatran, ximelagatran, and AZD0837) were identified. In these trials, patients treated with oral DTIs were more likely to experience an MI than their counterparts treated with warfarin (285 of 23,333 vs 133 of 16,024, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.66, p = 0.005). For secondary analysis, 8 studies (69,615 patients) were identified that compared warfarin with alternative anticoagulant including factor Xa inhibitors, DTIs, aspirin, and clopidogrel. There was no significant advantage in the rate of MIs with the use of warfarin versus comparators (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.34, p = 0.59). In conclusion, our data suggest that oral DTIs were associated with increased risk of MI. This increased risk appears to be a class effect of these agents, not a specific phenomenon unique to dabigatran or protective effect of warfarin. These findings support the need for enhanced postmarket surveillance of oral DTIs and other novel agents.

Topics: Amidines; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

For more than 5 decades, the only available treatment for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke were the vitamin K antagonists. Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been approved for the prevention of AF-related stroke. In the present article, the cost effectiveness of AF-related stroke-prevention strategies is reviewed. The emphasis on NOACs aims to provide an overview of their impact on health economics based on the published cost-effectiveness analyses. The available evidence suggests that the balance from the efficacy and safety point of view makes the treatment with the NOACs a cost-effective alternative to warfarin. Thus, the NOACs offer efficacy, safety and convenience, as well as cost effectiveness, for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Approval; Humans; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulant therapy, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with novel oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, is the mainstay for thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thromboembolic risk factors associated with AF and risk factors for bleeding associated with oral anticoagulant therapy are largely the same, and bleeding risk very rarely outweighs individual benefit of thrombosis prevention, thus resulting in positive net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulant therapy in almost all AF patients. Prevention of AF‑related thromboembolic events most commonly requires long‑term oral anticoagulant therapy. Over time, various clinical situations may occur in a given patient (e.g., a need for an urgent surgery or invasive intervention, acute stroke, etc.), which may require a temporary or permanent modification of anticoagulant therapy regardless of which anticoagulant drug has been used. This may be particularly challenging for physicians because many issues regarding optimal use of oral anticoagulant drugs in specific clinical situations still remain to be solved. In this review article, we discuss the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulant therapy, bridging, transition to another oral anticoagulant, the occurrence of acute stroke in a patient already taking an oral anticoagulant, and decision when it is safe to resume oral anticoagulation therapy after stroke. We summarize the available evidence and current (and future) approaches to oral anticoagulation management in such clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Forecasting; Humans; Morpholines; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Premedication; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease have a high risk of recurrent stroke, and secondary prevention in these patients remains a challenge. Aggressive medical management of vascular risk factors is safe and effective for most high risk patients, but the role of endovascular and surgical therapies still remain uncertain. Future studies may identify novel therapeutic strategies for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease, but aggressive risk factor control remains the mainstay of evidenced-based treatment at this time.

Topics: Aspirin; Carotid Artery, Common; Carotid Stenosis; Clopidogrel; Constriction, Pathologic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Risk Reduction Behavior; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

The review addresses the primary and secondary prevention of cardioembolic ischemic stroke, in particular, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Indications and schemes of anticoagulation treatment, advantages in stroke prevention and difficulties in using of the common oral anticoagulant warfarin are discussed. The authors compare the mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of the peroral anticoagulant rivaroxaban with warfarin. Based on the results of large meta-analyses, it has been concluded that the efficacy of rivaroxaban is rather superior to warfarin, this drug has the same safety profile and is more convenient in use. During treatment, no laboratory monitoring of hemostasis indicators is needed. This drug can be recommended for prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke in subjects with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (SPAF) in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY) trial. Numerically, more myocardial infarctions occurred in patients receiving dabigatran compared with well-controlled warfarin. This observation prompted a comprehensive analysis of cardiovascular outcomes, including myocardial infarction, in all completed Phase II and III trials of dabigatran etexilate.. The analysis included comparisons of dabigatran with warfarin, enoxaparin, and placebo. Data were analyzed for the occurrence of cardiovascular events from 14 comparative trials (n = 42,484) in five different indications. Individual study data were evaluated, as well as pooled subject-level data grouped by comparator.. In the pooled analysis of individual patient data comparing dabigatran with warfarin (SPAF and venous thromboembolism treatment indications), myocardial infarction occurrence favored warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.76 for dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88 for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily). The clinically relevant composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, total stroke, and vascular death demonstrated numerically fewer events in dabigatran 150 mg patients (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-1.00), but was similar for dabigatran 110 mg (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.13). Dabigatran had similar myocardial infarction rates when compared with enoxaparin or placebo.. These analyses suggest a more protective effect of well-controlled warfarin, but not enoxaparin, compared with dabigatran in preventing myocardial infarction in multiple clinical settings. Dabigatran showed an overall positive benefit-risk ratio for multiple clinically important cardiovascular composite endpoints in all evaluated clinical indications. In conclusion, these data suggest that myocardial infarction is not an adverse drug reaction associated with use of dabigatran.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Chi-Square Distribution; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and prior stroke are classified as high risk in all risk stratification schemes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) to warfarin in patients with AF and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including total 14527 patients, comparing NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) with warfarin were included in the analysis. Primary efficacy endpoint was ischemic stroke, and primary safety endpoint was intracranial bleeding. Random-effects models were used to pool efficacy and safety data across RCTs. RevMan and Stata software were used for direct and indirect comparisons, respectively.. In patients with AF and previous stroke or TIA, effects of NOACs were not statistically different from that of warfarin, in reduction of stroke (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73- 1.01), disabling and fatal stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.04), and all-cause mortality (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 -1.02). Randomization to NOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of intracranial bleeding (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70). There were no major differences in efficacy between apixaban, dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID) and rivaroxaban. Major bleeding was significantly lower with apixaban and dabigatran (110 mg BID) compared with dabigatran (150 mg BID) and rivaroxaban.. NOACs may not be more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with a prior history of cerebrovascular ischemia, but have a lower risk of intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thrombin; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) markedly increases the risk of stroke. Warfarin is highly effective for the prevention of stroke in such patients, but it is difficult to use and causes bleeding. Three new oral anticoagulants have been approved for stroke prevention in AF patients, and are at least as effective as warfarin with better bleeding profiles. These new agents have changed and simplified our approach to stroke prevention, as the threshold for initiation of oral anticoagulation is lower. All patients with AF should be risk assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and all patients with a score of 1 or above (except women with female sex as their only risk factor on the CHA2DS2-VASc score) should be considered for oral anticoagulation with one of the new agents. Formal bleeding risk assessment is essential, and can be done by using the well-validated HAS-BLED score.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Approval; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is a commonly encountered problem in the outpatient setting. This article presents an overview of the outpatient management of oral anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the setting of atrial fibrillation. Results of recent clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of 3 of the new target-specific oral anticoagulants are reviewed. Discussion includes determining patient candidates for the newer agents and consideration for choice of agent. Advantages and disadvantages to using these newer agents are presented, as are dosing adjustments for renal and hepatic impairment.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and oral factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have recently approved for prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Phase III trials have compared each of these agents to warfarin. Dabigatran was more efficacious than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke when given at a dose of 150 mg BID to patients with NVAF. Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD was superior to warfarin in on-treatment analysis. Apixaban 5 mg BID was also found to be superior to warfarin in reducing stroke in NVAF patients. Of note, the rate of hemorrhagic stroke was much smaller in the patients treated with NOAC than those with warfarin. NOAC offer a good therapeutic option for prevention of stroke in NVAF patients.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Infarction; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The development of novel oral anticoagulants that are effective alternatives to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a welcome advance. However, a variety of unresolved problems with their use, and not least with their cost, make it important to re-evaluate the use of warfarin as it will likely remain the anticoagulant of choice in South African patients with non-valvular AF for the foreseeable future. In this article, we review the correct clinical use of warfarin. Guidance is provided on commencing warfarin treatment, maintenance dosing, the recommended steps when temporary withdrawal of treatment is necessary, the management of bleeding, and the use of warfarin in chronic kidney disease. Techniques for changing from warfarin to one of the new oral anticoagulants and vice versa are included. 

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Therapy Management; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are individually associated with a higher incidence of stroke as compared with the general population. Over the last two decades, an increase in prevalence of AF is seen in patients with CKD. While long-term anticoagulation with warfarin is well established to reduce the risk of thromboembolic event in patients with AF, its safety and efficacy has not been documented in patients with severe CKD.. In this review, the authors analyze the risk and benefit of long term anticoagulation across the spectrum of AF patients with CKD and explore the role of novel agents in this unique patient population. A Medline search of the English literature published between 1980 and 2012 was performed using the heading 'chronic kidney disease' combined with 'atrial fibrillation', 'hemodialysis', 'warfarin', 'anticoagulation' and 'new oral anticoagulants'.. Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin under strict monitoring appears to be the cornerstone of therapy in patients with CKD to prevent stroke. Further research is warranted to explore the safety and efficacy of newer anticoagulant agents in these high-risk patients in order to reduce the incidence of disabling stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There are a growing number of new anticoagulants used as an alternative to warfarin. Surgeons will be confronted with an increasing number of patients who may be on these outpatient medications and must be familiar with their management strategies. The purpose of this review is to examine the mechanisms, monitoring and therapeutic reversal of the non-warfarin antithrombotic agents now so frequently confronting the acute care surgeon.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Perioperative Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Warfarin

There is clinical equipoise between warfarin and aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm (SR). The objective of this meta-analysis was to pool risk estimates for stroke, mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from published clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for English-language RCTs comparing warfarin to aspirin in heart failure through May 2012. Pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated from a random-effects model.. Four RCTs (n=3681) met the criteria for study inclusion. Warfarin was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared with aspirin (pooled RR, .59; 95% confidence interval [CI], .41-.85; P=.004). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 61. There was no difference between warfarin and aspirin in mortality (pooled RR, 1; 95% CI, .88-1.13), and ICH (pooled RR, 2.17; 95% CI, .76-6.24). Among secondary outcomes, warfarin was associated with almost twice the risk of major hemorrhage (pooled RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.37-2.76; P=.0001) compared with aspirin. The number needed to harm (NNH) was 34. There was no significant difference between warfarin and aspirin in risk of myocardial infarction (MI) (pooled RR, 1.02; 95% CI, .65-1.6], and heart failure exacerbation (HFE) (pooled RR, 1.11; 95% CI, .76-1.63).. Compared with aspirin, warfarin reduced the risk of stroke while conferring an increased risk of major hemorrhage. Warfarin does not increase mortality or confer an increased risk of ICH compared with aspirin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulants can complicate the approach to the management of patients undergoing operative interventions. We review new anticoagulants that have been introduced recently to the market or that are undergoing investigations for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixiban, and edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The risk-benefit profile of warfarin versus aspirin for patients with heart failure in normal sinus rhythm has not been definitively established. Our objective was to evaluate the overall comparative effects of warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and normal sinus rhythm.. Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov from January 1966 to June 2012 were searched to identify relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials that included comparison of warfarin versus aspirin, and composite end point of death or stroke separately for active treatment and control groups. Summary incidence rates, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. The search identified 4 randomized controlled trials of warfarin versus aspirin therapy, enrolling 3663 patients. There was no significant difference between the 2 treatments for the primary end point (warfarin versus aspirin: RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.06; P=0.31). Warfarin (versus aspirin) was associated with lower risk of any stroke (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82; P=0.003) and ischemic stroke (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P=0.02) but had a neutral effect on death (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89-1.14; P=0.89) and a higher risk of major bleeding (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.37-2.76; P=0.0002).. Compared with aspirin, warfarin does not provide benefit in the prevention of stroke and death among patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm, but raises the risk of major bleeding; and therefore its use in these patients is not justified.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and risk factors for stroke need anticoagulation to avoid thromboembolic complications. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are an established pharmacological group the use of which is recommended by guidelines. However, VKAs (like warfarin) have major disadvantages, such as a variable dose-effect relationship, drug and food interactions, the need for regular blood testing and dose titration, and, finally, a substantial risk of bleeding. New oral anticoagulants are intended to replace warfarin, being at least as safe and effective, and lacking some of the disadvantages of VKAs. Clinical data for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and other new drugs, are discussed in this article with special focus on their use in nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Design; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin reduces ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation, but has numerous limitations. Novel oral anticoagulants provide more predictable anticoagulation with fewer shortcomings.. Novel oral anticoagulants are superior to warfarin to prevent stroke or systemic embolism.. Phase III randomized warfarin-controlled trials enrolling >3000 patients that reported clinical efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through October 2012. Two reviewers extracted data; differences were resolved by consensus. The end points analyzed were stroke or systemic embolism (primary efficacy composite); all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism (individually, secondary efficacy); and hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding (individually, safety). The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from fixed-effects (if homogenous) or random-effects models (if heterogeneous).. In 5 studies of 51895 patients, the composite of stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98; P = 0.03) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.96; P = 0.0026, respectively) were reduced with the novel agents. Factor Xa inhibitors significantly reduced the primary composite (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74-0.94; P = 0.004) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84 - 0.98; P = 0.01). Direct thrombin inhibitor achieved results similar to the overall meta-analysis (drug class-outcome interactions P = 0.47 for primary outcome, P = 1.00 for mortality). Compared with warfarin, novel anticoagulants markedly reduced hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.64; P < 0.0001).. Novel oral anticoagulants may be superior to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, reducing the composite of stroke or systemic embolism and lowering all-cause mortality. The benefit is largely due to fewer hemorrhagic strokes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Chi-Square Distribution; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Recent anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF have been tested in active comparator controlled studies versus warfarin using two designs: double-blind, double-dummy and prospective randomised, open blinded endpoint (PROBE). The former requires elaborate procedures to maintain blinding, while PROBE does not. Outcomes of double-blind and PROBE designed studies of novel anticoagulants for AF, focusing on warfarin controls, were explored. Major, Phase III warfarin-controlled trials for stroke prevention in AF were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) of key outcomes for active comparators versus VKA and event rates for VKA arms were compared between designs, in context of baseline demographics and inclusion criteria. Identified trials studied five novel anticoagulants in three each of PROBE and double-blind design. For ORs of results across studies and outcomes, there was little pattern differentiating the two designs. Among VKA-control subjects, event rates for the primary outcome (stroke or systemic embolism) in PROBE trials at 1.74 %/year (95% confidence interval: 1.54-1.95) was not significantly different from that in double-blind trials, at 1.88 (1.73-2.03). Among other outcomes, VKA-treated subjects in both trial designs had similar event rates, apart from higher all-cause mortality in ROCKET AF, and lower myocardial infarction rates among the PROBE study patients. Although there are differences in outcome between PROBE and double blind trials, they do not appear to be design-related. The exacting requirements of double-blinding in AF trials may not be necessary.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiology; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation increases with age, augmenting the risk of embolic stroke in elderly individuals. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the long-term use of oral anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation to reduce risk of stroke. Until recently, vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) were the only oral anticoagulants available, but using warfarin in elderly patients can be challenging. Newer oral anticoagulants may offer specific benefits and increased convenience for elderly patients, because they have predictable pharmacologic profiles, a rapid onset of action, a wide therapeutic window, no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring, and fewer and better-defined food and drug interactions compared with warfarin. This review highlights the benefits and challenges of warfarin use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and discusses potential efficacy and safety benefits for newer oral agents in these patients. The potential for increased rates of major bleeding in the elderly, particularly those with numerous concomitant medications or renal impairment, also is discussed. Practical considerations for the use of long-term anticoagulation in elderly patients also are discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel anticoagulants that have been approved for the prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. These medications are attractive to both patients and clinicians, as, unlike warfarin, they do not require laboratory monitoring or dietary restrictions. However, they carry bleeding risks similar to that of warfarin and are without a reliable reversal agent.. The objectives of this article are to 1) summarize the pivotal trials leading to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of dabigatran (Pradaxa; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Titusville, NJ); 2) present the limited data available regarding the management of bleeding patients on these agents; and 3) provide suggestions to guide emergency providers given the limited data.. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were approved based on large, non-inferiority trials comparing the new agents to warfarin with stroke or systemic embolism as the primary outcome. Traditional coagulation studies cannot be used to determine the degree of anti-coagulation produced by these agents. Fresh frozen plasma is unlikely to be effective in patients on these drugs who are acutely bleeding. Prothrombin complex concentrate can be considered in patients on rivaroxaban. Dabigatran is renally cleared, so dabigatran could be removed by hemodialysis. Theoretically, DDAVP (Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ), aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, or recombinant activated factor VII could also be used in an attempt to control bleeding.. There is a need for assays for the degree of anticoagulation produced by drugs such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Additionally, studies are needed to evaluate reversal agents that could be effective in the setting of acute bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Emergencies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common significant cardiac rhythm disorder, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Atrial fibrillation confers a fivefold increased risk of stroke, and these strokes are associated with significant mortality and disability. The vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, has been the mainstay of anticoagulant therapy for patients with AF, reducing the risk of stroke by 65%. Despite its efficacy, warfarin remains underused in clinical practice because of its variable dose response, diet and medication interactions, and need for frequent monitoring. Stroke prevention in AF has entered an exciting therapeutic era with new classes of targeted anticoagulants that avoid the many pitfalls of the vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran, an oral thrombin inhibitor, and the factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have demonstrated efficacy for stroke prevention and a reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage relative to warfarin. Translating the efficacy of clinical trials into effective use of these novel agents in clinical practice will require an understanding of their pharmacokinetic profiles, dose selection, and management in select clinical situations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) has traditionally been confined to aspirin and warfarin therapy. Based on CHADS2 scoring it was clearly delineated when aspirin and warfarin would be used in individual patients, but many patients had to forgo recommended therapy due to contraindications or adverse events. There has recently been a paradigm shift in SPAF, with new and promising options on the horizon. These emerging strategies include dual antiplatelet therapy, direct thrombin inhibition, factor Xa inhibition and mechanical prophylaxis therapy. With each of these aforementioned approaches there are moderate to large clinical trials that assess the comparative effectiveness of these approaches in direct comparative trials. From an Ovid MEDLINE search from 1950 to present, we systematically identified 15 randomized trials comparing two thromboprophylactic drugs, devices or procedures for SPAF. Specific mechanical, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic advantages and disadvantages are also reviewed.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Dabigatran is a direct inhibitor of thrombin that has recently been approved for primary and secondary stroke prevention and prevention of systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy [with Dabigatran Etexilate]) study showed that dabigatran given at a dose of 110 mg twice a day (bid) was associated with rates of stroke and systemic embolism that were similar to those associated with warfarin (International Normalized Ratio target 2.0-3.0), and lower rates of major hemorrhage. Dabigatran administered at a dose of 150 mg bid was significantly more effective compared with warfarin and showed a similar rate of major hemorrhages. Both dosages resulted in an approximately 60% to 70% relative reduction of intracranial hemorrhage. The dosage of 110 mg bid should be preferably used in patients older than 75 years at a higher bleeding risk. The Hemoclot (Hyphen BioMed, Mason, OH) test to measure dabigatran serum concentration is commercially available, but presence of the drug may also be detected using the activated partial thromboplastin time or thrombin time.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Warfarin

Randomized clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated that warfarin prevents stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. This evidence led the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology to designate warfarin as a Class I indication in patients at moderate to high risk for stroke. Despite the evidence from randomized clinical trials and clear practice guidelines, warfarin is underutilized in many eligible patients. This is, at least in part, due to the many challenges associated with warfarin use that have led to the development of many new anticoagulants including direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. In this article, we review the complexities of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, underscoring the challenges related to warfarin use, and present an overview of new anticoagulants particularly, factor Xa inhibitors, with special emphasis on emerging data from randomized clinical trials on their efficacy and safety in the management of atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, phenprocoumon) is successful in both primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, yielding a 60-70% relative reduction in stroke risk compared with placebo, as well as a mortality reduction of 26%. However, these agents have a number of well documented shortcomings. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reduces the relative risk of stroke by a nonsignificant 19% compared with placebo, and increased bleeding risk offsets any therapeutic gain from the combination of ASA with clopidogrel. This review describes the current landscape and developments in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, with special reference to secondary prevention.. A number of new drugs for oral anticoagulation that do not exhibit the limitations of vitamin K antagonists are under investigation. These include direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors. Recent studies (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, AVERROES, ARISTOTLE) provide promising results for new agents, including higher efficacy and significantly lower incidences of intracranial bleeds compared with warfarin. The new substances show similar results in secondary as in primary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.. New anticoagulants add to the therapeutic options for patients with atrial fibrillation, and offer a number of advantages over warfarin, for both the clinician and patient, including a favourable bleeding profile and convenience of use. Consideration of these new anticoagulants will improve clinical decision making.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Decision Making; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombin; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The management of atrial fibrillation has evolved greatly in the past few years, and many areas have had substantial advances or developments. Recognition of the limitations of aspirin and the availability of new oral anticoagulant drugs that overcome the inherent drawbacks associated with warfarin will enable widespread application of effective thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulants. The emphasis on stroke risk stratification has shifted towards identification of so-called truly low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who do not need antithrombotic therapy, whereas oral anticoagulation therapy should be considered in patients with one or more risk factors for stroke. New antiarrhythmic drugs, such as dronedarone and vernakalant, have provided some additional opportunities for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. However, the management of the disorder is increasingly driven by symptoms. The availability of non-pharmacological approaches, such as ablation, has allowed additional options for the management of atrial fibrillation in patients who are unsuitable for or intolerant of drug approaches.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Algorithms; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiovascular Agents; Catheter Ablation; Decision Trees; Electric Countershock; Humans; Patient-Centered Care; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation/flutter is the most common cardiac arrhythmia that can potentially result in stroke and death. For many years, aspirin and warfarin have been the cornerstone of stroke prevention among such patients. Although warfarin therapy has been advocated for patients with high likelihood of stroke, it requires close surveillance and monitoring, has a narrow therapeutic window and is quite often affected by medication interactions and diet. Thus, the need for a better and more consistent anticoagulant therapy was necessary and has been under development with various successes for many years. This article will review 3 new antithrombotic medications that may potentially become the mainstay for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation in the near future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Until recently, pharmaceutical options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation were restricted to aspirin or vitamin K antagonist therapy. In recent years development has been underway for alternatives. Apixaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, is orally dosed, target selective and has few known drug or food interactions. As such, it is a member of a new generation of anticoagulants expected to revolutionize the way we approach anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Apixaban has been studied in Phase II and Phase III trials for a variety of indications. The AVERROES trial established apixaban as superior to aspirin for stroke reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom vitamin K antagonist therapy is unsuitable. The recent ARISTOTLE trial found apixaban to be superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in a wide range of patients with atrial fibrillation, with significantly lower bleeding risk, and lower risk of all-cause mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin has long been considered the gold standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, three major trials comparing the efficacy and safety of new drugs: a thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and two inhibitors of factor Xa - rivaroxaban and apixaban, with that of warfarin, have been published. The aim of this paper is to present the main results of the RE-LY, ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE trials, compare study populations and outcomes, and discuss clinical implications of their results for the long-term anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Despite warfarin's marked efficacy, not all eligible patients receive it for stroke prevention in AF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between prescriber and/or patient characteristics and subsequent prescription of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Observational studies conducted in the US using multivariate analysis to determine the relationship between characteristics and the odds of receiving warfarin for stroke prevention were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE and a manual review of references. Effect estimates of prescriber and/or patient characteristics from individual studies were pooled to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.. Twenty-eight studies reporting results of 33 unique multivariate analyses were identified. Warfarin use across studies ranged from 9.1%-79.8% (median=49.1%). There was a moderately-strong correlation between warfarin use and year of study (r=0.60, p=0.002). Upon meta-analysis, characteristics associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of warfarin use included history of cerebrovascular accident (OR=1.59), heart failure (OR=1.36), and male gender (OR=1.12). Those associated with a significant reduction in the odds of warfarin use included alcohol/drug abuse (OR=0.62), perceived barriers to compliance (OR=0.87), contraindication(s) to warfarin (OR=0.81), dementia (OR=0.32), falls (OR=0.60), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR=0.47), intracranial hemorrhage (OR=0.39), hepatic (OR=0.59), and renal impairment (OR=0.69). While age per 10-year increase (OR=0.78) and advancing age as a dichotomized variable (cut-off varied by study) (OR=0.57) were associated with significant reductions in warfarin use; qualitative review of results of studies evaluating age as a categorical variable did not confirm this relationship.. Warfarin use has increased somewhat over time. The decision to prescribe warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is based upon multiple prescriber and patient characteristics. These findings can be used by family practice prescribers and other healthcare decision-makers to target interventions or methods to improve utilization of warfarin when it is indicated for stroke prevention.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

For more than 60 years, vitamin K antagonists have been the only available oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF). Several new molecules, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and avoiding routine monitoring, have been recently developed, opening a new era in anticoagulation. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the oral activated factor X inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are the novel oral anticoagulants with data from large randomized clinical trials showing that these drugs are noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and thromboembolic complications of AF, with the advantage of less hemorrhagic stroke and intracranial bleeding. While these trial data are extremely encouraging, several practical issues (e.g., lack of specific antidote, safety of long-term treatment or cost-effectiveness in "real-life" clinical practice) still need to be elucidated.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drugs, Investigational; Factor X; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin has provided protection against cardioembolic stroke in the setting of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for the past 60 years. Dabigatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor to be approved in the United States, promises to provide the same or better stroke protection with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage. However, it remains to be seen whether grand-scale adoption of dabigatran will be cost effective.. To critically assess current evidence regarding the cost effectiveness of dabigatran for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF compared with warfarin.. The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of vascular neurology.. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) that followed a hypothetical cohort of NVAF patients 65 years of age or older and CHADS2≥1 over their lifetime comparing dabigatran with adjusted-dose warfarin was reviewed. Assuming a willingness to pay a threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), base case results favored high-dose (150 mg bid) dabigatran as a cost-effective alternative to warfarin. Sensitivity analysis asserted that the cost effectiveness of dabigatran improved if it could be obtained for ≤$13/d or if it was used in populations with high risk of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.. Dabigatran 150 mg bid ($12,286 per QALY) is a cost-effective alternative to International Normalized Ratio-adjusted warfarin for the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients 65 years of age or older with NVAF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Humans; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

It is uncertain whether thrombolytic therapy is safe in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who are treated with warfarin and have a subtherapeutic international normalised ratio (INR) at stroke onset.. The authors performed a systematic review of the literature and included studies that assessed the relation between prior warfarin use with subtherapeutic INR and outcome after intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke. Outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH), modified Rankin scale score 0-2 and mortality. Second, the authors performed a meta-analysis of the included studies.. Seven studies with 3631 patients were included. 240 (6.6%) patients used warfarin before stroke onset. The risk of SICH was increased in the warfarin group (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 5.9. p=0.02). There was no significant difference, however, in functional outcome (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2, p=0.32) or death from all causes (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.8).. The risk of SICH after thrombolytic therapy is increased in patients using warfarin with subtherapeutic INR levels. The authors found no evidence of an increase in death from all causes or worsening of functional outcome in warfarin treated patients.

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects more than 3 million Americans and is expected to reach epidemic proportions as the US population ages. The presence of AF increases lifetime stroke risk nearly 5-fold. Conventionally, patients at moderate or high risk of stroke have been prescribed antiplatelet agents or vitamin K antagonists to reduce the risk, but each has significant limitations. Accordingly, the development of new oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors [DTIs] and factor Xa inhibitors) has attracted significant interest. The DTI dabigatran etexilate was recently shown to provide superior risk reduction to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism for patients with nonvalvular AF and recently gained US Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication. Dabigatran etexilate is the first new agent for this indication in the United States in more than 50 years. Herein, we outline the options for stroke prevention in AF in the new oral anticoagulant era. The efficacy and practical obstacles surrounding the use of warfarin are summarized. We then review the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of dabigatran-including clinically relevant pharmacokinetics. Practical issues of initiation, conversion of anticoagulant therapy, and recommendations for dabigatran use in patients at high risk of bleeding and other special populations are discussed. We conclude by proposing a role for dabigatran in the armamentarium of drugs available for the management of stroke risk in AF.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Cardioembolic strokes account for one-sixth of all strokes and are an important potentially preventable cause of morbidity and mortality. Vitamin K antagonists (e.g., warfarin) are effective for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and in those with mechanical heart valves but because of their inherent limitations are underutilized and often suboptimally managed. Antiplatelet therapies have been the only alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF but although they are safer and more convenient they are much less efficacious. The advent of new oral anticoagulant drugs offers the potential to reduce the burden of cardioembolic stroke by providing access to effective, safe, and more convenient therapies. New oral anticoagulants have begun to replace warfarin for stroke prevention in some patients with AF, based on the favorable results of recently completed phase III randomized controlled trials, and provide for the first time an alternative to antiplatelet therapy for patients deemed unsuitable for warfarin. The promise of the new oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves is currently being tested in a phase II trial. If efficacy and safety are demonstrated, the new oral anticoagulants will provide an alternative to warfarin for patients with mechanical heart valves and may also lead to increased use of mechanical valves for patients who would not have received them in the past because of the requirement for long term warfarin therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

In the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial, dabigatran 150 mg was shown to be superior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. However, there are some concerns with the RE-LY trial, such as its open-label design, potential unblinding of "blinded" adjudicators, the use of concomitant warfarin-aspirin (ASA), the disparity between baseline use of nonselective NSAIDs; the high unequal rate of drop-outs; unaccounted drop-ins; high rates of major bleeds in warfarin-treated patients, despite being a low risk population; and rates of major bleeds that do not match historic warfarin trials. Furthermore, although dabigatran offers potential advantages versus warfarin, there are disadvantages that must be taken into consideration before a patient is switched from the latter to the former. This review will summarize the flaws of the RE-LY trial as well as the clinically important advantages and disadvantages of dabigatran and warfarin.. This review examines the differences between dabigatran and warfarin in terms of side effects, drug-drug interactions, drug-food interactions, and potential reasons for using one anticoagulant rather than the other. The main focus of this review is a discussion of the design, procedures and results of the RE-LY trial.. There seem to be major flaws with the RE-LY trial. A double-blinded trial should be performed testing dabigatran against warfarin to verify the results of the RE-LY trial.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Although several new antithrombotic agents have been developed for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), many patients will continue to be treated with warfarin worldwide. We performed a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes in patients with AF treated with warfarin for stroke prevention in large contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies; RCTs comparing warfarin with an alternative thromboprophylaxis strategy with at least 400 patients in the warfarin arm and reporting stroke as an efficacy outcome were included.. Eight RCTs with 55,789 patient-years of warfarin therapy follow-up were included. Overall time spent in the therapeutic range was 55% to 68%. The annual incidence of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF taking warfarin was estimated to be 1.66% (95% CI, 1.41%-1.91%). Major bleeding rates varied from 1.40% to 3.40% per year across the studies. The risk of stroke per year was significantly higher in elderly patients (2.27%), female patients (2.12%), patients with a history of stroke (2.64%), and patients reporting no previous exposure to vitamin K antagonists (1.96%). There was a significant increase in the annual incidence of stroke with progressively increasing CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and prior stroke) scores.. Current use of warfarin as a stroke prevention agent in patients with AF is associated with a low rate of residual stroke or systemic embolism estimated to be 1.66% per year. Compared with a previous meta-analysis, there has been significant improvement in the proportion of time spent in therapeutic anticoagulation, with a resultant decline in observed stroke rates.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Oligosaccharides; Primary Prevention; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Stroke remains a leading cause of death worldwide and the first cause of disability in the western world. Ischemic stroke (IS) accounts for almost 80% of the total cases of strokes and is a complex and multifactorial disease caused by the combination of vascular risk factors, environment and genetic factors. Investigations of the genetics of atherosclerosis and IS has greatly enhanced our knowledge of this complex multifactorial disease. In this article we sought to review common single-gene disorders relevant to IS, summarize candidate gene and genome-wide studies aimed at discovering genetic stroke risk factors and subclinical phenotypes, and to briefly discuss pharmacogenetics related to stroke treatments. Genetics of IS is, in fact, one of the most promising research frontiers and genetic testing may be helpful for novel drug discoveries as well as for appropriate drug and dose selection for treatment of patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Carotid Stenosis; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thienopyridines; Tunica Intima; Warfarin

The use of warfarin in older patients requires special consideration because of concerns with comorbidities, interacting medications, and the risk of bleeding. Several studies have suggested that warfarin may be underused or inconsistently prescribed in long-term care (LTC); no published systematic review has evaluated warfarin use for stroke prevention in this setting. This review was conducted to summarize the body of published original research regarding the use of warfarin in the LTC population.. A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library was conducted from January 1985 to August 2010 to identify studies that reported warfarin use in LTC. Studies were grouped by (1) rates of warfarin use and prescribing patterns, (2) association of resident and institutional characteristics with warfarin prescribing, (3) prescriber attitudes and concerns about warfarin use, (4) warfarin management and monitoring, and (5) warfarin-related adverse events. Summaries of study findings and quality assessments of each study were developed.. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most common indication for warfarin use in LTC and use of warfarin for stroke survivors was common. Rates of warfarin use in AF were low in 5 studies, ranging from 17% to 57%. These usage rates were low even among residents with high stroke risk and low bleeding risk. Scored bleeding risk had no apparent association with warfarin use in AF. In physician surveys, factors associated with not prescribing warfarin included risk of falls, dementia, short life expectancy, and history of bleeding. International normalized ratio was in the target range approximately half of the time. The combined overall rate of warfarin-related adverse events and potential events was 25.5 per 100 resident months on warfarin therapy.. Among residents with AF, use of warfarin and maintenance of INR levels to prevent stroke appear to be suboptimal. Among prescribers, perceived challenges associated with warfarin therapy often outweigh its benefits. Further research is needed to explicitly consider the appropriate balancing of risks and benefits in this frail patient population.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Long-Term Care; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia, especially in older people. This condition is associated with an increased risk of stroke, and long-term anticoagulation treatment is therefore needed. Vitamin K antagonists are effective in reducing the risk of stroke but optimal use of these drugs remains difficult. The development of new oral anticoagulant drugs is therefore highly relevant. Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Its prodrug, dabigatran etexilate, is marketed under the name of Pradaxa and was initially approved for the prevention of thromboembolic events in major orthopedic surgery. It has been recently approved for stroke prevention in patients with AF. The purpose of this paper is to review--in light of current knowledge--the interests and limits of using dabigatran etexilate in AF. Briefly, dabigatran etexilate is not inferior to warfarin in AF. However many questions remain unanswered, including questions related to the concomitant use of dabigatran etexilate and acetylsalicylic acid, the possible increased risk of myocardial infarction and the need for drug monitoring.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic; Platelet Aggregation; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, have been developed as alternatives to warfarin, the standard oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants to those of warfarin in patients with AF. The published research was systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of >1 year in duration that compared new oral anticoagulants to warfarin in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool efficacy and safety data across randomized controlled trials. Three studies, including 44,563 patients, were identified. Patients randomized to new oral anticoagulants had a decreased risk for all-cause stroke and systemic embolism (relative risk [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.92), ischemic and unidentified stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), and vascular mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Randomization to a new oral anticoagulant was associated with a lower risk for intracranial bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66). Data regarding the risks for major bleeding (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.72) were inconclusive. In conclusion, the new oral anticoagulants are more efficacious than warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF. With a decreased risk for intracranial bleeding, they appear to have a favorable safety profile, making them promising alternatives to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation is increasing because of an aging population. Vitamin K antagonists have been the standard therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation but are underutilized and often poorly managed because of their inherent limitations. This study critically reviews the recently completed phase 3 randomized controlled trials of new oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: RE-LY (dabigatran), AVERROES (apixaban), ARISTOTLE (apixaban) and ROCKET-AF (rivaroxaban).. On the basis of their favorable pharmacological characteristics and excellent efficacy and safety profile as demonstrated by the results of the randomized controlled trials, the new OACs have the potential to replace vitamin K antagonists as the first-line treatment for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with warfarin reserved for patients with contraindications to the new OACs and those unable to afford them.. The new OACs represent a major advance for patients with atrial fibrillation with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality due to cardioembolic stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Warfarin has been the cornerstone of treatment to reduce stroke risk in AF patients for decades. Although effective in preventing thrombosis, warfarin is difficult to manage and is associated with a 1% to 7% yearly risk of major hemorrhage. Until recently, there were no effective oral alternatives to warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved in 2010 for the reduction of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF, and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was approved for a similar indication in 2011. Other late-stage orally administered agents that may be approved for this indication include apixaban and edoxaban; others at earlier stages of development will be discussed in this review as well. Nonpharmacological approaches to stroke prevention include left atrial appendage removal, ligation, or occlusion. This review examines advances in the management of stroke risk in AF patients, focusing on recently marketed and late-stage modalities. The advent of alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in AF patients may improve physicians' ability to offer safe and effective stroke prevention in all AF patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin Proteins; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Chemoprevention; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

As the population ages, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to rise. The most feared complication of this common cardiac arrhythmia is cardioembolic stroke. Strokes related to AF are associated with greater morbidity and mortality than ischemic strokes of most other etiologies and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems around the world. Until recently, warfarin was the sole anticoagulant proven effective for stroke prevention patients with AF at elevated risk, but its narrow therapeutic margin and variable dose response limited clinical utility. The emergence of new anticoagulants that offer equal or superior efficacy, greater safety and the convenience of fixed oral dosing may make warfarin the less preferred option. This review provides an update on recent advancements in antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

To quantify the risk for bleeding complications after thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in patients on warfarin (international normalized ratio [INR] ≤ 1.7) and to put these data into perspective with previous studies.. A total of 548 consecutive stroke patients receiving IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) were prospectively evaluated and details about warfarin pretreatment were carefully recorded. Prothrombin time-based INR values were measured before thrombolysis and 6 and 24 hours thereafter. Intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 72 hours was assessed by CT examinations and defined according to National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria. Main outcome variables were symptomatic intracranial and major systemic bleedings.. Of the 548 patients, 33 (6.0%) and 14 (2.6%) experienced symptomatic intracranial and major systemic bleedings, respectively. Patients taking warfarin until the day of or day before admission (n = 15, mean ± SD INR 1.21 ± 0.32 vs 1.01 ± 1.12, p = 0.030) faced an approximately 4-fold risk for intracranial hemorrhage (20.0% vs 5.6%, unadjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 4.2 [1.1-15.7], p = 0.033). Findings were similar after adjustment for age, NIH Stroke Scale score, and diabetes (adjusted OR [95% CI] 4.1 [1.0-16.1], p = 0.044) and when focusing on any major bleeding (intracranial or systemic) (unadjusted OR [95% CI] 4.1 [1.3-13.6], p = 0.019). Half of the patients with bleedings showed an INR rise above 1.7 6 hours after thrombolysis. A meta-analysis yielded confirmatory yet heterogeneous results (unadjusted OR [95% CI] derived from a random effects model, 2.31 [1.15-4.62], p = 0.018, I(2) = 58% [11%-80%]).. Our data suggest a statistically significant and clinically meaningful increase in the risk for symptomatic intracranial and major systemic bleedings among patients with stroke thrombolysis receiving warfarin up to the day of or day before stroke.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been challenging over decades, mostly due to a number of difficulties associated with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which have been the most effective stroke prevention treatment for a long time. The oral direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran) and oral direct inhibitors of factor Xa (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban) have emerged recently as an alternative to VKAs for stroke prevention in AF. These drugs act rapidly, and have a predictable and stable dose-related anticoagulant effect with a few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. The novel oral anticoagulants are used in fixed doses with no need for regular laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation intensity. However, each of these drugs has distinct pharmacological properties that could influence optimal use in clinical practice. The following phase 3 randomized trials with novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for stroke prevention in AF have been completed: the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial with dabigatran, the Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct Factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial with rivaroxaban, and the Apixaban for Reduction of Stroke and Other Thromboembolism Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial with apixaban. Moreover, the Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to prevent Strokes (AVERROES) trial included patients with AF who have failed or were unsuitable for warfarin, and compared apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in AF. Overall, apixaban has two large trials for stroke prevention in AF showing benefits not only over warfarin, but also over aspirin among those patients who have failed or refused warfarin. In the ARISTOTLE trial, apixaban was superior to warfarin in the reduction of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality, with a similar reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke and better tolerability. When compared with aspirin in the AVERROES trial, apixaban was associated with more effective reduction of stroke, a similar risk of major bleeding, and better tolerability. In this review article, the authors summarize the current knowledge on novel oral anticoagulants and discuss the clinical aspects of their use for stroke prevention in AF, with particular emphasis on apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

This article provides an overview of the clinical profile of oral dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Pradax™) [hereafter referred to as dabigatran] when used for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), followed by a review of cost-utility analyses of dabigatran in this patient population. Dabigatran (110 or 150 mg twice daily) demonstrated noninferiority versus adjusted-dose warfarin with regard to the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (primary endpoint) in patients with AF in the RE-LY trial, and the 150 mg twice-daily dosage was significantly more effective than warfarin for this endpoint, as well as most other efficacy endpoints. The incidence of major bleeding was generally similar in patients receiving dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or warfarin, but was lower in patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg twice daily. With regard to other bleeding endpoints, dabigatran was generally associated with lower rates than warfarin, except for gastrointestinal major bleeding. Dabigatran (both dosages) was associated with a higher incidence of dyspepsia than warfarin. Results of modelled cost-utility analyses from several countries from the perspective of a healthcare payer over a lifetime (or 20-year) time horizon and primarily based on data from the RE-LY trial were generally consistent. All but one analysis demonstrated that twice-daily dabigatran 150 mg (or age-adjusted, sequential dosing) was cost effective with regard to the incremental cost per QALY gained relative to adjusted-dose warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in AF patients, as the results were below generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. In contrast, the incremental cost per QALY gained for dabigatran 110 mg twice daily versus warfarin exceeded cost-effectiveness thresholds in all studies except one. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the cost utility of dabigatran versus warfarin was generally robust to variations in the majority of parameters. However, the incremental cost per QALY gained for dabigatran versus warfarin improved when levels of international normalized ratio control in warfarin recipients decreased and when the baseline level of risk of stroke increased.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Embolism; Humans; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulant drugs are emerging as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Two agents are direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and the third is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). They have been separately compared to warfarin in large randomised trials. Our objective was to indirectly compare the three agents to each other for major efficacy and safety outcomes. Studies were assessed for comparability and the odds ratios of selected outcomes for each anticoagulant versus one another were estimated indirectly. The three cohorts differed significantly in terms of CHADS(2) score and the number of individuals with a past history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. The estimated odds ratio of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.35 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.04), 0.97 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.81), 1.22 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.18), 0.88 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.34) and 0.90 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p=0.43). The estimated odds ratio of major bleeding was 1.10 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.36), 1.28 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.02), 0.74 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.004), 0.87 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.17) and 0.68 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p<0.001). In conclusion, the available data indicate no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It appears however that apixaban is associated with less major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg or rivaroxaban and that rivaroxaban is less effective than dabigatran 150 mg in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Such an indirect comparison should be used only to generate hypotheses which need to be tested in a dedicated randomised trial comparing the three drugs directly.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Automated electronic queries of structured data fields in electronic medical records (EMR) found no barriers to warfarin in 42% of patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) with moderate or high risk of stroke and no warfarin. A thorough manual review of records (including text reports) from the same EMR may better identify physicians' reasons for not using warfarin.. This was a cross-sectional, retrospective, manual EMR review. Patients identified in a previous automated EMR study with a CHADS2 (Chronic heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke) score≥2, no record of warfarin, no barrier to warfarin use, and (in the present study) confirmation of AF diagnosis were included in the manual EMR review. A structured chart abstraction form was used to extract data visible in the clinicians' EMR user interface. Reasons why warfarin had not been prescribed were reported using descriptive statistics.. Among 408 patients with 'no barriers' to warfarin in the automated EMR review, AF diagnosis was confirmed in 319 patients (mean age 74.8; 65% female). Forty-one percent (n=132) did not have chart records explaining why they were not on warfarin. Among the 59% (187) with a rationale against warfarin found in the records, the most common category (52%) was indicative of the risk of bleeding, either risk of fall or history of recent bleeding. The second most common category (16%) reflected that the patient was back in sinus rhythm. These findings are subject to inherent limitations of retrospective chart reviews.. Many patients with AF and moderate-to-high risk of stroke are not treated with warfarin, and reasons for not using warfarin could not always be identified in patient records. Among patients with documented reasons, risk of bleeding (risk of fall or recent bleeding) was the most common category.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Medical Audit; Medical Records Systems, Computerized; Stroke; Warfarin

Vit-K antagonists are the therapy of choice to prevent thromboembolic events due to atrial fibrillation since many years. New oral anticoagulants (NOA) showed encouraging results vs. warfarin but there are no data directly comparing different NOA. We performed an adjusted indirect meta-analysis.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched. Efficacy end points were the cumulative rate of thomboembolic stroke (TES) and systemic embolism (SE). Main safety end point was the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (HS).. Three RCTs (50578 patients) were included. Overall, NOA were comparable to warfarin according to the cumulative risk of TES and SE, as well as for TES alone. NOA were associated with a reduced rate of SE [OR 0.64 (0.44, 0.94], P=0.02]. Compared to warfarin, NOA were associated with a significantly reduced risk of HS [OR 0.43 (0.34, 0.55), P<0.001, NNT to avoid a HS 153] and all cause death [OR 0.90 [0.84, 0.96], P=0.03, NNT to save one fatality 43]. Head to head comparison showed that in terms of cumulative rate of TES/SE, as well as of TES, none of the NOA was significantly superior to the others (all Ps>0.05). Rivaroxaban showed superiority in the prevention of SE. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily was associated with the largest reduction in the risk of HS vs. warfarin and vs. other NOA. Overall mortality was quite comparable across NOA.. Overall superiority of NOA over warfarin is largely influenced by the reduction of HS. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily seems to have the best risk/benefit profile.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pharmacovigilance; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Biological Availability; Biotransformation; Blood Coagulation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Half-Life; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Adjustment; Stroke; Warfarin

In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) with warfarin in the setting of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Strengths and weaknesses of the studies were examined in detail through indirect comparison. We analyze and comment the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the characteristics of randomized patients, the primary efficacy and safety end points and side effects. All new oral anticoagulants resulted in being non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in reducing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban were superior to vitamin K antagonists. Importantly, new oral anticoagulants significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke in all three studies. Major differences among new oral anticoagulants include the way they are eliminated and side effects. Both dabigatran and apixaban were tested in low- to moderate-risk patients (mean CHADS2 [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke] score = 2.1-2.2) whereas rivaroxaban was tested in high-risk patients (mean CHADS2 score = 3.48) and at variance with dabigatran and apixaban was administered once daily. Apixaban significantly reduced mortality from any cause. The choice of a new oral anticoagulant should take into account these and other differences between the new drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Preventive Health Services; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke. New anticoagulation agents have recently provided alternative and promising approaches. This paper reviews the current state of anticoagulation therapy in AF patients, focusing on various clinical scenarios and on comparisons, where possible, between western and eastern populations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiology; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) warfarin has been the mainstay therapy for stroke prevention. In recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) oral direct thrombin inhibitor (Dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (Rivaroxaban and Apixaban) challenged the efficacy and safety benchmarks set by warfarin. These drugs boast a rapid onset of action, shorter half-life and fewer drug and dietary interactions. Moreover, these new anticoagulants do not require monitoring, titration or dose adjustments. These agents have already been approved for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Uncertainty regarding suitability, efficacy and safety in certain patient subsets and issues related to the ability effectively monitor the pharmacodynamic effects and reverse the therapeutic effects of these drugs should be addressed as we engage in a widespread use of these agents in various patient subsets.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The occurrence of disabling stroke, the major fatal consequence of atrial fibrillation, can be reduced by almost two-thirds with warfarin oral anticoagulation. Recent estimates on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the USA suggest that approximately 3 million people suffer from this common cardiac arrhythmia, therefore, the socioeconomic impact of adequate oral anticoagulation is enormous. Rivaroxaban, a direct orally available factor Xa inhibitor, is the first of a new class of drugs that target a central factor of the coagulation cascade upstream of thrombin. In the ROCKET AF clinical trial, rivaroxaban demonstrated noninferiority compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, while intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban treatment. Rivaroxban has recently been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by the US FDA and EMA. Very recently, rivaroxaban in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy, was shown to reduce mortality in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 clinical trial. The clinical evaluation of rivaroxaban in cardiovascular disease and the results of the ROCKET AF study, the landmark clinical trial of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention, are discussed along with the unique pharmacological profile of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Genotype-based dosing recommendations are provided in the US FDA-approved warfarin labeling. However, data that informed these recommendations were from predominately Caucasian populations. Studies show that variants contributing to warfarin dose requirements in Caucasians provide similar contributions to dose requirements in US Hispanics, but significantly lesser contributions in African-Americans. Further data demonstrate that variants occurring commonly in individuals of African ancestry, but rarely in other racial groups, significantly influence dose requirements in African-Americans. These data suggest that it is important to consider variants specific for African-Americans when implementing genotype-guided warfarin dosing in this population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Black or African American; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Carbon-Carbon Ligases; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Cytochrome P450 Family 4; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Genetic Variation; Genome-Wide Association Study; Genotype; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Minority Groups; Mixed Function Oxygenases; Pharmacogenetics; Stroke; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin; White People

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Decision Support Techniques; Health Status Indicators; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation with vitamin k antagonists (VKAs) requires regular testing and dose adjustment. Home-monitoring (self-testing or self-management) is more effective than usual management. Dabigatran, does not require dose-adjustment and appears to be more effective at reducing the risk of stroke with similar risks of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Dabigatran, however, has not been compared to the home-monitoring. It was the objective to evaluate the efficacy of dabigatran compared with home-monitoring of oral anticoagulation with VKAs. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing usual management of oral anticoagulation with home-monitoring, dabigatran with usual management, and RCTs comparing dabigatran with home-monitoring and including patient-important outcomes (thromboembolic events, death and major bleeding) were eligible. For our direct comparison we calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) using the Mantzel-Haenzel random effect model. For the indirect comparison we estimated lnRRs and back transformed to RR. We evaluated the quality of the evidence with the GRADE system. Dabigatran, compared with warfarin, was associated with lower rates of stroke or thromboembolism and systemic embolism but similar rates of major haemorrhage and death. Dabigatran 150 mg also increased non-significantly the rate of myocardial infarction. The quality of the evidence was high. Our indirect comparison of home-monitoring of oral anticoagulation versus dabigatran showed no convincing differences in the risk of thromboembolism, death or major bleeding. The estimates for self-management vs. dabigatran showed stronger but still non-significant trends. The quality of the evidence was low. In conclusion, the indirect comparison of home monitoring of oral anticoagulation with dabigatran suggests that the treatments have similar impact on thrombosis, bleeding and death. However, the confidence in the estimate of effect is low to very low. Our analyses contrast with the available comparison of dabigatran with conventional warfarin monitoring.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Self Care; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac rhythm disorder worldwide, affecting 1% of the general population. It is estimated that up to 16 million people in the US will suffer from the arrhythmia by 2050. AF is an independent stroke risk factor and associated with more severe strokes. For six decades, warfarin has been the only truly effective therapy to protect against stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite the proven worth of warfarin, its limitations have seen reluctance amongst physicians and patients to utilise this efficacious agent. This has meant that substantial numbers of patients are either unprotected against stroke or suboptimally protected with antiplatelet therapy. Contemporary well-validated stroke risk factor schemes (CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc) now permit rapid but comprehensive evaluation of a patient's risk for thromboembolism, allowing better identification of low-risk patients who do not require antithrombotic therapy, and whilst for those with ≥1 stroke risk factors require formal oral anticoagulation. Aspirin has been proven to be inferior to anticoagulation, and is not free of bleeding risk. We also have simple scores to easily evaluate a patient's risk of haemorrhage (e.g. HAS-BLED). The emergence of new oral anticoagulants should further improve stroke prevention in AF, and they successfully negotiate many of the hurdles to oral anticoagulation generated by warfarin's limitations. Monitoring, reversal, and perioperative management are areas which require further investigation to enhance our ability to safely and effectively utilise the new agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dronedarone; Drug Design; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is a potent risk factor for stroke and transient ischemic attack. Most patients with AF receive antithrombotic stroke prophylaxis, often in the form of a vitamin K antagonist, typically warfarin. Drug treatment with warfarin is associated with significant management issues, such as an unpredictable dose response necessitating dose adjustments, frequent laboratory monitoring, and multiple interactions with other medications, as well as foods. A new generation of novel anticoagulants has emerged that includes dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, both highly selective factor Xa inhibitors. These newer agents possess a highly predictable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, allowing for fixed dosing and no necessity for routine laboratory monitoring; additionally these agents have minimal drug interactions. Dabigatran etexilate and apixaban are both twice-daily medications, whereas rivaroxaban is administered once daily for stroke prophylaxis. The impact of dosing frequency on medication adherence with these agents has not been prospectively evaluated; however, the frequency of dosing intervals has been shown to affect medication adherence, which in turn may influence patient outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

A number of novel oral anticoagulants that directly target factor Xa or thrombin have been developed in recent years. Rivaroxaban and apixaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) and dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) have shown considerable promise in large-scale, randomised clinical studies for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and have been approved for clinical use in specific indications. Rivaroxaban is licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Based on the clinical trial data for rivaroxaban, feedback on its use in clinical practice and the authors' experience with the use of rivaroxaban, practical guidance for the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations and specific clinical situations is provided. Although most recommendations are in line with the European summary of product characteristics for the approved indications, additional and, in several areas, different recommendations are given based on review of the literature and the authors' clinical experience.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Epidemiologic evidence supports a genetic predisposition to stroke. Recent advances, primarily using the genome-wide association study approach, are transforming what we know about the genetics of multifactorial stroke, and are identifying novel stroke genes. The current findings are consistent with different stroke subtypes having different genetic architecture. These discoveries may identify novel pathways involved in stroke pathogenesis, and suggest new treatment approaches. However, the already identified genetic variants explain only a small proportion of overall stroke risk, and therefore are not currently useful in predicting risk for the individual patient. Such risk prediction may become a reality as identification of a greater number of stroke risk variants that explain the majority of genetic risk proceeds, and perhaps when information on rare variants, identified by whole-genome sequencing, is also incorporated into risk algorithms. Pharmacogenomics may offer the potential for earlier implementation of 'personalized genetic' medicine. Genetic variants affecting clopidogrel and warfarin metabolism may identify non-responders and reduce side-effects, but these approaches have not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Genetic Variation; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Precision Medicine; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin have many drawbacks that reduce their uptake, safety and effectiveness. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban (20 mg/day; 15 mg/day in patients with creatinine clearance 30-49 ml/min) with dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalized ratio 2-3) in 14,264 patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or at least two other additional risk factors for stroke. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism, with a similar rate of major bleeding and a substantial reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. These results, in conjunction with its convenient once-daily dosing regimen, make rivaroxaban an attractive alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Stroke and systemic thromboembolism remain critical causes of mortality and morbidity in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran etexilate is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, which provides stroke risk reduction for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Randomized clinical data demonstrate dabigatran to be an alternative oral anticoagulant with an improved efficacy profile compared with oral warfarin dose adjusted to an INR (international normalized ratio) target of 2.0 to 3.0.. Our aim was to review the pharmacology, mechanism of action, drug metabolism, and clinical trial data supporting dabigatran use.. We reviewed all the major published clinical studies of dabigatran and analyzed data regarding practical applications in selected clinical scenarios.. This review provides recommendations for clinicians regarding dosing during invasive surgical procedures, transitioning off alternative anticoagulants, and a discussion of storage and handling of the drug.. Our effort should facilitate the safe and effective use of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyridines; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly prevalent disease in the elderly. Patients with AF are at increased risk of ischemic stroke, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Warfarin is highly effective at reducing stroke risk, with a net clinical benefit favoring treatment in older individuals. The advent of newer oral anticoagulants provides promising alternatives to warfarin. Appropriate risk stratification for stroke should be performed for all patients with AF to guide antithrombotic therapy. For patients at lower stroke risk, bleeding risk stratification tools can also be used when the benefit of anticoagulant therapy is unclear.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

The reported incidence, prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are variable. The risks and benefits of warfarin anticoagulation need to be defined as the risk of bleeding in ESRD patients may overwhelm the benefits of embolic stroke prevention. We undertook a systematic literature review to clarify these issues.. A literature search was undertaken using Medline and EMBASE from 1990 to September 2011. Studies that reported incidence, prevalence or selected outcomes in ESRD patients with AF were included. Cross-sectional, cohort and randomized controlled trials with >25 participants were included. The lists of authors and abstracts from the search were reviewed by two investigators to determine the manuscripts for full text review. Data were abstracted to a form designed specifically for this study. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Event rates were calculated using a random-effects model.. Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of AF was 11.6% and the overall incidence was 2.7/100 patient-years. The risk of mortality and stroke was increased in ESRD patients with AF at 26.9 and 5.2/100 patient-years versus 13.4 and 1.9/100 patient-years compared with ESRD patients without AF. The majority of studies do not support a protective effect for warfarin in ESRD patients with AF.. The incidence and prevalence of AF in ESRD patients are higher than in the general population and are associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality. An appropriately designed randomized controlled trial is required to determine whether anticoagulation is an appropriate therapeutic strategy in patients with end-stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Prevalence; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

To assess whether the combined analysis of all phase III trials of nonvitamin-K-antagonist (non-VKA) oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack shows a significant difference in efficacy or safety compared with warfarin.. We searched PubMed until May 31, 2012, for randomized clinical trials using the following search items: atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, warfarin, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Studies had to be phase III trials in atrial fibrillation patients comparing warfarin with a non-VKA currently on the market or with the intention to be brought to the market in North America or Europe. Analysis was performed on intention-to-treat basis. A fixed-effects model was used as more appropriate than a random-effects model when combining a small number of studies.. Among 47 potentially eligible articles, 3 were included in the meta-analysis. In 14 527 patients, non-VKAs were associated with a significant reduction of stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 074-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 14%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 134 over 1.8-2.0 years) compared with warfarin. Non-VKAs were also associated with a significant reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin (odds ratios, 0.86 [95% CI, 075-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 13%; absolute risk reduction, 0.8%; number needed to treat, 125), mainly driven by the significant reduction of hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratios, 0.44 [95% CI, 032-0.62]; relative risk reduction, 57.9%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 139).. In the context of the significant limitations of combining the results of disparate trials of different agents, non-VKAs seem to be associated with a significant reduction in rates of stroke or systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding when compared with warfarin in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

Antithrombotic therapy plays an essential role in the management of some of the most common and morbid medical conditions. Triple oral antithrombotic therapy (TOAT) is defined as the administration of both therapeutic oral anticoagulation (OAC) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with indications for both treatments. The current societal guidelines regarding TOAT are derived from observational studies and some trials of the use of warfarin in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. The general apprehension to administer TOAT is due to the heightened concern for bleeding, rendering warfarin's pharmacokinetic properties concerning. Newer anticoagulant agents may serve as appealing alternatives, and further investigations are warranted. The results of the recent trials that have studied the use of these agents in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome offer some useful applications to TOAT. Ultimately, selecting the most favorable antithrombotic strategy is going to involve weighing the risks and benefits for each patient.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hematology; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Risk; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Reduction of atrial fibrillation-associated stroke risk has become the leading indication for warfarin use. Optimal management of warfarin can only be achieved with a relatively complex infrastructure. Alternative anticoagulant agents have been developed, and 3 have demonstrated effectiveness, safety, and adherence that are comparable or superior to warfarin in the clinical trial setting. None of the novel agents requires routine laboratory testing to demonstrate effective anticoagulation. Whereas these new agents present potential advantages, such as fixed dosing and dramatically reduced intracranial hemorrhaging, they are also subject to caveats that ought to be considered in the context of an "ideal" anticoagulant. If used casually, they have the potential to worsen rather than improve health care outcomes. There is little question that the management burden of the novel agents will be less than with warfarin. However, with a hemorrhagic risk that was similar to warfarin in these trials, there will likely remain a significant need for both baseline education and some level of focused interval follow-up to assess for bleeding risk and adherence considerations. These novel agents offer a definite advance in the available management options for thromboembolic disease, but until we understand the requirements for safe and effective use in the routine clinical setting, we will not be able to establish the extent to which they should replace warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Hematology; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Compliance; Placebos; Risk; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The emergence of new oral anticoagulants is a major development in cardiovascular medicine. In this overview, we sought to evaluate the impact of gender, heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes on stroke prevention with warfarin and the new oral anticoagulants by conducting a semisystematic review and meta-analysis including 44,563 patients in recent contemporary Phase III trials. The new oral anticoagulants were superior to warfarin irrespective of gender or the presence of diabetes. For nonparoxysmal AF, event rates are similar with warfarin and new anticoagulants. There is some suggestion of the benefit of new oral anticoagulants in patients with paroxysmal AF. For patients without heart failure, the new drugs are superior, whereas in patients with evidence of heart failure the new drugs were similar to warfarin. In conclusion, new oral anticoagulants are better than warfarin irrespective of gender or the presence of diabetes mellitus. Patients with heart failure and nonparoxysmal AF seem not to gain additional prognostic benefit from new anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Complications; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

There is a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the United States, particularly in the elderly population. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at an increased risk of stroke and anticoagulant therapy is recommended. However, many eligible patients are not receiving therapy due to limitations and concerns related to the use of the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, such as slow onset of action, variable drug metabolism, risk of bleeding, and requirement for monitoring. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed and may be used as an alternative to warfarin. This review article summarizes the current clinical trial data for warfarin compared with the NOACs dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor), and rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors). Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) demonstrated superiority in reducing the stroke or systemic embolism rate compared with warfarin (1.53% vs 1.69%; P < 0.001). The risk of major bleeding was similar for dabigatran and warfarin (3.32% per year vs 3.57% per year; P = 0.32). Rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) demonstrated noninferiority in reducing the stroke or systemic embolism rate compared with warfarin (2.1% vs 2.4%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin for the risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (14.9% per year vs 14.5% per year; P = 0.44). Apixaban (5 mg twice daily) demonstrated superiority compared with warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism (1.27% vs 1.60%; P = 0.01). Apixaban significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin (2.13% per year vs 3.09% per year; P < 0.001). Compared with warfarin, all-cause mortality was numerically lower for dabigatran (P = 0.051) and similar for rivaroxaban (P = 0.15). Apixaban demonstrated significantly lower mortality rates compared with warfarin (3.52% vs 3.94%; P = 0.047). All 3 NOACS--dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban--significantly reduced intracranial hemorrhage compared with warfarin. Novel oral anticoagulants may be a suitable alternative to warfarin for different patient populations due to minimal drug interactions, lower bleeding risk, and no monitoring requirement.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic stroke. Anticoagulant therapy has been shown to reduce the risk for ischemic stroke in patients with AF; however, these studies have excluded patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This review examines the relationships between ESRD, AF, and the use of anticoagulants to prevent ischemic stroke. Medline and Embase were used to identify relevant articles. Identified review articles and their references were searched. The prevalence of AF in patients with ESRD is higher than that in the general population; ESRD appears to be an independent risk factor for AF. The presence of AF in patients with ESRD increases the risk for stroke, although this effect is less pronounced when compared with the general population. The presence of ESRD confers an increased risk for bleeding; warfarin appears to enhance this risk. Observational data suggest that warfarin increases the rate of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with ESRD, but are unclear on its utility in reducing ischemic stroke. In addition to increasing the risk for bleeding, warfarin may also promote vascular calcification in this population. Currently, there are no oral anticoagulants other than warfarin that are approved for use in patients with ESRD. Recent guidelines suggest that warfarin only be used for secondary prevention in patients with ESRD and AF. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the role of warfarin or other anticoagulants in preventing stroke in patients with ESRD and AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (IS) is an important cause of lifelong disability. Arteriopathies due to trauma and infection are an important underlying cause of childhood arterial ischemic stroke. The secondary prevention of IS should be conducted taking into account the main pathogenetic mechanisms and vascular risk factors. For secondary stroke prevention, the majority of children are treated with either anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies. This review focuses on the recent international clinical recommendations in secondary stroke prevention based on the results of randomized multicenter clinical studies published by the USA. cardiology association. Experience of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies for secondary stroke prevention is insufficient in Russia. Taking into account the available international recommendations is expedient for creation and practical application of the Russian standards for secondary arterial ischemic stroke prevention.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Child; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin is a cornerstone of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Anticoagulation with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is over twice as effective in secondary prevention of stroke as any other tested alternatives, including all other antithrombotic drugs or surgical interventions. General belief is that warfarin is capable of preventing 20 ischemic strokes for every hemorrhagic one it causes. However, warfarin is one of the most feared agents as a result of its woeful safety profile and difficulties in maintaining the proper daily dose. Recent research in pharmacogenetics predominantly focused on elucidating the influence of individual genetic predispositions to administered warfarin. Although the incorporation of genotype information improves the accuracy of adequate dose prediction, an improvement in anticoagulation control or a reduction in hemorrhagic complications has not been yet convincingly demonstrated. It is clear that identifying an individual patient's risk for hemorrhage on warfarin will require more broad clinical and genetic studies. Future research focused on patients with stroke should concentrate on defining the possible differences, especially focusing on predicting bleeding events in general and intracranial hemorrhages in particular. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing evidence about pharmacogenetics of warfarin in general, especially focusing on stroke prevention.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Risk; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia responsible for one third of the hospitalizations because of cardiac rhythm disturbances. Atrial fibrillation leads to stroke, heart failure, and other causes of mortality. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is the first-line agent for the prophylaxis of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Limitations associated with warfarin have led to development of new anticoagulants targeting different sites in the coagulation cascade. A direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, has been evaluated in clinical studies for prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Factor Xa inhibitors, direct as well as indirect inhibitors, are in various stages of development for their antithrombotic effect. This article reviews the studies done on these novel anticoagulants and their prophylactic potential for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

For many years, warfarin was the only effective oral anticoagulant to prevent and treat thromboembolism. Nevertheless, its clinical use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window, extensive drug interactions, need of strict dietary control and frequent monitoring. The pharmacological response is also unpredictable and highly variable among patients. Suboptimal anticoagulation can lead to detrimental thromboembolic events or life-threatening bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) activity represents a new class of anticoagulant activity that was intended to replace warfarin. Ximelagatran was the first DTI shown to have similar efficacy to warfarin, but failed to replace it because of a high incidence of liver toxicity. Dabigatran etexilate is another novel DTI with a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and fewer drug interactions compared with warfarin. Recent large-scaled, randomized studies have shown that it does not share ximelagatran's hepatotoxicity, and is as effective as conventional anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). These findings led to the approval of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery in Europe, Canada and the United Kingdom. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning the use of dabigatran etexilate in VTE (BISTRO, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE, RE-MOBILIZE and RECOVER) and AF (PETRO and RELY). Potential problems related to dabigatran use are also discussed to examine whether it can truly replace warfarin as the gold standard.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Medical management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for stroke is limited by problems of imperfect tools for assessment of thromboembolism and bleeding risks. Improved instruments, such as the CHA₂DS₂VASc and HAS-BLED risk stratification scores, have been incorporated into European practice guidelines. Until recently, the most effective therapy for stroke prevention has been anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist, but new oral anticoagulants in development, antiarrhythmic drugs that reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with AF, and interventional techniques for occlusion of the left atrial appendage represent promising options for stroke prevention. These new strategies will need focused evaluation in the most challenging AF patients-those with a high risk of bleeding, prior thromboembolism, or thrombosis-prone surfaces such as mechanical heart valve prostheses or drug-eluting coronary stents, for whom the limitations of currently available treatment options and a paucity of data are particularly acute.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Our knowledge of the pharmacogenetics of warfarin and clopidogrel continues to expand as we learn more about the individual genetic variations that contribute to the drugs' efficacy and toxicity. We aim to review the recent developments in the field and discuss the clinical implications for the treatment of ischemic stroke patients. Despite recent advances, there is still insufficient data to suggest that routine genetic testing improves outcomes in patients treated with warfarin or clopidogrel for prevention of stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Periprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events are complications of percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The management of anticoagulation before and after RFA could play an important role in the prevention of these complications. The incidence of thromboembolic events varies from 1% to 5%, depending on the ablation and the anticoagulation strategy used in the periprocedural period. The scientific evidence behind the management of anticoagulation in patients with AF undergoing RFA is scarce and is mostly based on small studies and experts' consensus. It remains unclear whether catheter ablation for AF reduces the risk of stroke and obviates the need for anticoagulation after the procedure. Limited data are available regarding the risk of thromboembolism with and without warfarin after AF ablation. In this review we will review the most current evidence supporting the different strategies to reduce thromboembolic risk before, during, and after catheter ablation for AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Postoperative Period; Preoperative Care; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a fivefold increased risk for stroke due to thromboembolic events. Warfarin remains the standard medical therapy for decades in these patients but is difficult to use safely and conveniently. Chronic warfarin therapy is contraindicated in 14% to 44% of patients with AF who are at risk for stroke. In clinical practice, warfarin is prescribed to only 15% to 60% of patients with AF who are at high risk for thromboembolic events and have no clear contraindication to their use. Alternatives to warfarin include (i) antiplatelet therapy; (ii) new oral anticoagulants; and (iii) exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as a major embolic source. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was superior to aspirin alone in reducing the risk of stroke in patients unsuitable to warfarin. Furthermore, a number of newer oral anticoagulants are currently under investigation for stroke prevention in AF. Oral direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors are in the most advanced stages of development. Given that about 90% of the source of thromboembolism occurs in the LAA in patients with non-valvular AF, occlusion of flow into the LAA may prevent thrombus formation in the appendage and hence reduction of stroke. Recently, several devices have been employed percutaneously with encouraging results in selected patients. Current review summarizes the latest clinical trial data pertinent to dual-antiplatelet therapy, several newer antithrombotic agents and LAA occlusion.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is of paramount importance given its associated morbidity and mortality. The many challenges of warfarin limit its effective use in real-world clinical practice. We are entering an exciting therapeutic era as new classes of anticoagulants, including direct thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors and novel vitamin K antagonists, are being evaluated for possible use in this patient population. If proven to be as efficacious as warfarin and safer, expanded use of these novel agents to lower risk subgroups may be justified. It is imperative that providers be aware of the many advantages and potential challenges posed by use of these novel agents in routine clinical care. An understanding of individual pharmacokinetic profiles and potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions will translate into improved effectiveness in real-world practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Half-Life; Humans; Preventive Medicine; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Clinical research into the management of atrial fibrillation—the most common serious arrhythmia—has mostly focused on arrhythmia prevention and the reduction of vascular events and death. In 2010, important advances have been made in stroke prevention with new anticoagulants and in atrial fibrillation rhythm management.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

An increasing number of patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-s). However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment for these patients is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the benefits and risks of triple antithrombotic therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and OAC) after stent implantation in patients under long-term OAC treatment compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin and clopidogrel).. The study consisted of clinical controlled trials with ≥ 3 months of follow-up that compared triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation in patients undergoing long-term OAC treatment.. Nine clinical trials included 1,996 participants. The meta-analysis was feasible because the grouping criterion was similar. The meta-analysis of the prevention of a major adverse cardiovascular event shows triple antithrombotic therapy to be more efficacious than dual antiplatelet therapy (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86; P = .005). There was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with triple antithrombotic therapy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. The meta-analysis of major bleeding in the first 6 months during follow-up shows significantly more events with triple antithrombotic therapy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.29; P = .04).. Based on our analysis, triple antithrombotic therapy is substantially more efficacious in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events and mortality in PCI-s patients with an indication for long-term OAC, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. Although triple therapy predisposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding, especially major bleeding, it is the better choice for patients with a low bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heart Diseases; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin is underused because it has many disadvantages for clinical use despite it has been used more than a half century as an only oral anticoagulant. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor, which is not metabolized by cytochrome P450, and thus does not require blood coagulation monitoring or vitamin K intake limitation, or produce drug interaction. RE-LY was a randomized controlled trial to prove non-inferiority of dabigatran to warfarin in 18,113 high risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The results showed that stroke or systemic embolism was less frequent in patients on 150 mg dabigatran, major hemorrhage was less frequent in patients on 110 mg dabigatran, and hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in patients on both 110 mg and 150 mg dabigatran than in patients on warfarin. Dabigatran is expected to be approved as a more effective and safer oral anticoagulant than warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Randomized controlled trials of many factor Xa inhibitors in comparison with warfarin are also ongoing in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Older patients are less likely than younger patients to receive anticoagulation and are more likely to be underanticoagulated. Although the use of warfarin in the elderly has been increasing, fewer than half of eligible patients take warfarin. Evidence suggests that stroke recurrence in patients on oral anticoagulation is mainly ischemic, and hemorrhagic complications that derive from oral anticoagulation would be related to overdosing. Several risk factors for developing hemorrhagic complications have been described, and clinical criteria have been designed to help clinicians in decision-making concerning the start of anticoagulation treatment. Finally, given the promising results of recent studies on new anticoagulant drugs, it is possible that vitamin K antagonists will be replaced in the coming years.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, yet because AF can often be intermittent or lacking in overt symptoms, its prevalence is underestimated, and it may be diagnosed only incidentally. Because AF is a potent ischemic stroke risk factor and stroke rates are similar for paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF, all AF types require prompt management. This involves identifying and treating underlying causative factors, then implementing a "rate-control" or "rhythm-control" strategy. Regardless of approach, concomitant antithrombotic therapy for stroke risk reduction is recommended. Antithrombotic agent choice (acetylsalicylic acid or warfarin) depends on level of stroke risk; this review covers both the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk stratification schemes. Warfarin provides effective ischemic stroke prophylaxis but has numerous drawbacks, including a narrow therapeutic range, unpredictable pharmacokinetics, slow on-/offset of action, and multiple food and drug interactions. New oral anticoagulants that lack many of these drawbacks are in development. Here we review these drugs for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Rate; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

To review the large phase 3 clinical trials that compare direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors with dose-adjusted warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who have an increased risk of stroke.. In large clinical trials, the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran and the long-acting factor Xa inhibitor idraparinux were effective for reducing the risk of thromboembolic stroke, but were not marketed because of liver toxicity and excessive bleeding, respectively. In separate clinical trials, the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the short-acting oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban were noninferior or superior to dose-adjusted warfarin for prevention of thromboembolic stroke and systemic embolism, without increasing the risk of bleeding, and were well tolerated. Apixaban, another oral factor Xa inhibitor, is effective in reducing thromboembolic stroke compared with aspirin alone. Results of a trial comparing apixaban with dose-adjusted warfarin are awaited.. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are effective, safe alternatives to dose-adjusted warfarin for reducing thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa; Hemostatics; Humans; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia. The most serious complication of AF is thromboembolic stroke. The individual risk of stroke in the setting of AF varies. Several clinical factors have been identified as independent predictors of stroke in AF, including prior stroke, age, hypertension and diabetes. The bulk of available data identifies female gender as another independent predictor of stroke risk in AF. In this article, we review the link between AF and an elevated stroke risk in women, explore the potential pathophysiologic basis for this association and examine the data regarding the effectiveness of anticoagulation in reducing this risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To determine the strength of evidence supporting an accentuated bleeding risk when patients with CHADS(2) risk factors (chronic heart failure, hypertension, advanced age, diabetes, and prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) receive warfarin.. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE (January 1, 1950, through December 22, 2009) and Cochrane CENTRAL (through December 22, 2009) was conducted to identify studies that reported multivariate results on the association between CHADS(2) covariates and risk of bleeding in patients receiving warfarin. Each covariate was evaluated for its association with a specific type of bleeding. Individual evaluations were rated as good, fair, or poor using methods consistent with those recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The strength of the associations between each CHADS(2) covariate and a specific type of bleeding was determined using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria as insufficient, very low, low, moderate, or high for the entire body of evidence.. Forty-one studies were identified, reporting 127 multivariate evaluations of the association between a CHADS(2) covariate and bleeding risk. No CHADS(2) covariate had a high strength of evidence for association with any bleeding type. For the vast majority of evaluations, the strength of evidence between covariates and bleeding was low. Advanced age was the only covariate that had a moderate strength of evidence for association; this was the strongest independent positive predictor for major bleeding. Similar findings were observed regardless of whether all included studies, or only those evaluating patients with atrial fibrillation, were assessed.. The associations between CHADS(2) covariates and increased bleeding risk were weak, with the exception of age. Given the known association of the CHADS(2) score and stroke risk, the decision to prescribe warfarin should be driven more by patients' risk of stroke than by the risk of bleeding.

Topics: Aging; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Disease; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Diabetes Complications; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observer Variation; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

the efficacy of warfarin for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established, but many people with AF who would benefit from warfarin are not receiving it. This systematic review aims to determine physicians' attitudes to the prescription of warfarin for AF, and identify reasons for its underuse.. an electronic search of MEDLINE (1950-present), EMBASE (1980-present), CINAHL (1994-present), PsycINFO (1987-present) and Web of Knowledge (1970-present) was performed in November 2010 to identify all studies which addressed, via survey, physicians' attitudes regarding anticoagulation for patients with AF.. a total of 1,375 citations were identified. Of these citations, 44 full text studies were obtained for scrutinisation; 14 of these studies were rejected leaving 30 studies which were included in the review. All included studies were cross-sectional surveys and addressed physicians' opinions of anticoagulation in AF as a primary or secondary aim. Increasing age, increased bleeding risk, previous bleeds, falls risk, co-morbidities and ability to comply with treatment influenced whether physicians would prescribe anticoagulation for AF.. physicians are reticent to recommend warfarin for elderly patients in AF, despite evidence of increased benefit in these patients compared with younger patients. Risk of falls and previous bleeding were also shown to be disproportionate barriers to warfarin prescription. Further studies are required to determine how best to overcome these perceived barriers to appropriate anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Attitude of Health Personnel; Contraindications; Data Collection; Hemorrhage; Humans; Physicians; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Animals; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Haplorhini; Humans; Pyridines; Rats; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Humans; Preventive Health Services; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Dabigatran and other new oral anticoagulants (OAC) represent a step forward in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). They indeed have been shown to be an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) without the burden of laboratory control. However, these new drugs compete with an effective and well-established therapy, thus bringing about a series of questions and doubts. In this report members of the board of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA) answer some questions every clinician might be confronted with.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Patient Selection; Primary Prevention; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa - Boehringer Ingelheim) is an oral anticoagulant that has been licensed in the EU since 2008 for thromboprophylaxis in adults following a hip or knee joint replacement. The marketing authorisation for the drug in the EU has recently been extended to include the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In theory, dabigatran could offer an advantage to patients who need anticoagulation because, unlike warfarin, its dose does not need to be individually adjusted and its effects do not require regular monitoring through blood sampling. Here we review the evidence for dabigatran in this new indication and consider its place in the management of patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Warfarin

The objective of this review is to summarize data from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) and Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Have Failed or Are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment (AVERROES) trials of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The ARISTOTLE trial compared apixaban with warfarin in 18 201 patients with AF and ≥ 1 additional risk factor for stroke. The AVERROES trial compared apixaban with aspirin in 5599 patients with AF who were at increased risk of stroke and for whom vitamin K antagonists were unsuitable. In ARISTOTLE, apixaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism by 21% compared with warfarin (1.27% vs 1.60% per year; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.95). The reduction was significant and demonstrated the superiority of apixaban over warfarin for the primary outcome of preventing stroke or systemic embolism (P = 0.01 for superiority). Apixaban also reduced all-cause mortality by 11% (P = 0.047) and major bleeding by 31% (P < 0.001) compared with warfarin. The benefits of apixaban observed in ARISTOTLE are further supported by the results from AVERROES, which demonstrated a 55% reduction in the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared with aspirin. Risk of major bleeding was not significantly different between apixaban and aspirin. Subgroup analyses in both trials demonstrated that the effects of apixaban are highly consistent across various patient subpopulations. Discontinuation of study medication was significantly lower with apixaban than with either warfarin in ARISTOTLE or aspirin in AVERROES. Apixaban is the first new oral anticoagulant that has been shown to be superior to warfarin in reducing stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding in patients with AF. Moreover, in patients with AF who are considered unsuitable for warfarin therapy, apixaban was more effective than aspirin for stroke prevention and had a similar rate of major bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Hemodynamics; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Warfarin

The complexities of oral anticoagulation with warfarin have led to the search for more practical alternative agents. Novel direct factor IIa inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors currently in development can be administered at a fixed dose and do not require routine coagulation monitoring and ongoing dosage adjustment to ensure their effectiveness and safety. A number of phase III trials of these agents for the prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with orthopedic surgery and acute medical illness, for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation have been completed, with almost universally positive results. If these novel agents are approved for use in the United States, the future of oral anticoagulant therapy will allow a more nuanced approach to drug selection than has been available in the past. Attention to drug interactions and renal function will be required, as methods to measure the presence of these agents are not precise, cannot quantify the degree of anticoagulant present, and are influenced by the changes in serum drug concentrations during the dosing interval. In the future, patient preferences and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of individual drugs will be able to be matched to optimize therapy. These new agents represent a new paradigm for anticoagulation that promises to improve patient care in the long term.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Approval; Drug Design; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prothrombin; Stroke; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin remains the drug of choice for long-term anticoagulation management in a variety of conditions. Despite an established role in prevention of thromboembolic events such as stroke, warfarin continues to be underutilized because of its association with serious drug-related adverse events. Lacking alternative therapeutic approaches, intensive research in the past decade has focused on making anticoagulation with warfarin safer. Much emphasis has been placed on defining factors associated with the wide individual variability in warfarin dose. Polymorphic sites in three genes, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, vitamin K 2,3 epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1), and CYP4F2, have been shown to affect stable warfarin dose. An overview of the persistent issues related to warfarin therapy and our current understanding of the genetic and clinical factors affecting warfarin dosing is presented. Finally, unresolved issues in improving clinical care of warfarin patients and future directions are provided.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Cytochrome P450 Family 4; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mixed Function Oxygenases; Pharmacogenetics; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

This review aims to determine whether it is cost-effective to replace aspirin and warfarin with more effective, yet more costly, treatments for secondary stroke prevention.. For preventing recurrent stroke of arterial origin, clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole are equally effective and more effective than aspirin. However, limited data only support their incremental cost-effectiveness, compared with aspirin, in nondisabled patients at high risk of a recurrent ischaemic event (e.g. >20% per year) and when used for short periods (e.g. <2 years). Clopidogrel is also cost-effective for patients who are intolerant of aspirin. For preventing recurrent stroke due to atrial fibrillation, warfarin is cost-effective. Although the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is more effective than aspirin, it is unlikely to be more cost-effective. Dabigatran is at least as effective and well tolerated as warfarin, but its eventual cost will determine its incremental cost-effectiveness. For atrial fibrillation patients in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated, percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage may be an alternative strategy. Dronedarone may prove to be a cost-effective adjunct to antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.. The incremental cost-effectiveness of newer antithrombotic treatments for secondary stroke prevention, compared with aspirin or warfarin, remains to be established.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Benzimidazoles; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

The role of aspirin for the primary prevention of stroke in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation is critically reviewed. It is shown that the currently held belief that aspirin (at doses of 75 to 325 mg daily) is an effective treatment is based on a flawed interpretation of the data. A Bayesian network meta analysis is presented that demonstrates that aspirin at 325 mg daily is superior to control and similar to warfarin for the reduction of the risk of both stroke and death. In contrast for lower daily doses of aspirin there is no evidence of any efficacy over control for the reduction of the risk of stroke. The data are inconclusive as to whether lower doses of aspirin may have some benefit in reducing the risk of death.

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Thromboembolism is a severe complication in atrial fibrillation. This overview presents thromboembolic disease as a single entity, ranging from stroke through mesenteric ischemia to acute limb ischemia. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for the terms "atrial fibrillation" and "thromboembolism" in reports published from January 1986 to September 2009. The information of 10 evidence-based practice guideline documents and 61 further sources was systematically extracted. In atrial fibrillation, the average annual stroke risk is increased by 2.3% (lethality 30%). The annual incidence of acute mesenteric ischemia is 0.14% (lethality 70%), and that of acute limb ischemia is 0.4% (lethality 16%). In total, approximately 80% of embolism-related deaths are from stroke and 20% from other systemic thromboembolism. The ischemic symptoms generally have an acute onset but may mimic other diseases, particularly in mesenteric ischemia. Early diagnosis and treatment can limit or even prevent tissue infarction. Guideline-recommended therapy with aspirin or warfarin reduces the thromboembolic risk. Suitable patients may optimize their warfarin therapy by self-monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR). New oral and parenteral anticoagulants with more stable pharmacokinetics are being developed. In conclusion, atrial fibrillation predisposes to thromboembolism. If ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism occurs, early diagnosis and treatment can improve outcomes. The thromboembolic risks are reduced by guideline-adherent antithrombotic therapy with warfarin or aspirin. Future directions may include self-monitoring of the international normalized ratio and novel anticoagulants.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Early Diagnosis; Evidence-Based Medicine; Germany; Humans; Incidence; Ischemia; Lower Extremity; Mesentery; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation by around 60%, while antiplatelet therapy is much less effective. Bleeding is, however, a notable adverse effect with warfarin. Another major drawback of warfarin is the need for frequent clotting assessment. Oral agents have been developed that directly inhibit the activity of thrombin (factor IIa), as well as drugs that directly block activated factor X (factor Xa), which is the first enzyme in the final common pathway to the activation of thrombin. These drugs have fast onset and offset of action and anticoagulation does not seem to need monitoring. These new agents for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation are being investigated in ongoing phase III trials. In one of these trials an oral thrombin blocker has so far shown superiority to warfarin in efficacy and safety. In this Review, I address the potential of modern oral anticoagulants to improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drugs, Investigational; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes nearly 10% of all ischemic strokes. Long-term oral anticoagulation with warfarin currently is the best treatment for preventing stroke in patients with AF and other stroke risk factors. However, many eligible patients do not receive warfarin, and some patients with AF are unsuitable for this treatment. Recent clinical trials have tested alternatives to long-term warfarin, and some new treatment options have emerged. Nonpharmacologic approaches to stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation also are under development. In addition, new diagnostic modalities may detect paroxysmal AF with more sensitivity, potentially expanding the population to be treated and the potential impact of stroke preventive strategies on the population. This review provides a practical guide to current treatment and diagnostic options.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Cerebral microbleeds (MB) are potential risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but it is unclear if they are a contraindication to using antithrombotic drugs. Insights could be gained by pooling data on MB frequency stratified by antithrombotic use in cohorts with ICH and ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA).. We performed a systematic review of published and unpublished data from cohorts with stroke or TIA to compare the presence of MB in: (1) antithrombotic users vs nonantithrombotic users with ICH; (2) antithrombotic users vs nonusers with IS/TIA; and (3) ICH vs ischemic events stratified by antithrombotic use. We also analyzed published and unpublished follow-up data to determine the risk of ICH in antithrombotic users with MB.. In a pooled analysis of 1460 ICH and 3817 IS/TIA, MB were more frequent in ICH vs IS/TIA in all treatment groups, but the excess increased from 2.8 (odds ratio; range, 2.3-3.5) in nonantithrombotic users to 5.7 (range, 3.4-9.7) in antiplatelet users and 8.0 (range, 3.5-17.8) in warfarin users (P difference=0.01). There was also an excess of MB in warfarin users vs nonusers with ICH (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.4; P<0.001) but none in warfarin users with IS/TIA (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.7; P=0.33; P difference=0.01). There was a smaller excess of MB in antiplatelet users vs nonusers with ICH (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3; P<0.001), but findings were similar for antiplatelet users with IS/TIA (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P<0.001; P difference=0.25). In pooled follow-up data for 768 antithrombotic users, presence of MB at baseline was associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent ICH (OR, 12.1; 95% CI, 3.4-42.5; P<0.001).. The excess of MB in warfarin users with ICH compared to other groups suggests that MB increase the risk of warfarin-associated ICH. Limited prospective data corroborate these findings, but larger prospective studies are urgently required.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Arterial and venous thromboembolism account for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Warfarin, and other vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), have been the only class of oral anticoagulants currently in clinical use and have been so for over 50 years. Although warfarin is effective in preventing thromboembolism, its use is limited by its narrow therapeutic index that necessitates frequent monitoring and dose adjustments resulting in considerable inconvenience to patients and clinicians. There are now several orally administered anticoagulants in late stages of clinical development that may offer effective, safer, and more convenient anticoagulation. This review summarizes and compares data on novel anticoagulants in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism, acute coronary syndromes, and the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Prevention of stroke and systemic emboli is paramount in the management of atrial fibrillation. Although warfarin is the predominant anticoagulant used in patients with atrial fibrillation, it has significant limitations that have impeded appropriate use of stroke prophylaxis in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation. Consequently, much research has been focused on finding an alternative to warfarin. We review the potential alternatives in development and evaluate the current evidence concerning their safety and efficacy.. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors are potentially well tolerated and effective replacements for warfarin. These agents do not require cofactors and offer selective inhibition at a critical step of amplification in the coagulation cascade. Multiple direct anti-factor Xa agents are currently undergoing evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Early results suggest that these novel anticoagulants have favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with minimal-to-no requirements for therapeutic monitoring. Two direct factor Xa inhibitors are emerging from phase II trials (betrixaban and YM150) and three are being evaluated in phase III trials (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation. The phase III trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban have completed enrollment and are in the follow-up phase.. Given the growing population of patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a great interest in finding new therapies for oral anticoagulation. The direct factor Xa inhibitors may offer several promising alternatives to warfarin therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke prevention is the primary goal in atrial fibrillation (AF) given its clinical and socioeconomic impact. With AF, the prevalence of thromboembolic stroke continues to rise and there is an urgent need to develop better strategies of stroke prevention. Warfarin, although effective when used appropriately, is burdened by underutilization, narrow therapeutic windows, and life-threatening bleeding complications. Novel pharmacologic agents have been plagued by off-target toxicity and only modest improvement in bleeding complications over warfarin. Because most thromboemboli arise from the left atrial appendage (LAA), surgical exclusion of the LAA is often used in AF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Percutaneous device LAA closure has now been developed as an adjunct and as an alternative to pharmacotherapy in patients with AF. Promising randomized data are available with the WATCHMAN device, while several other devices are in various stages of clinical and preclinical development.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheterization; Heart Atria; Humans; Prevalence; Risk Assessment; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) study demonstrated a significant increase in myocardial infarction events with dabigatran compared with warfarin, provoking renewed interest in whether vitamin K antagonists are useful drugs for the prevention of myocardial infarction in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Present analyses examined whether there was an increased risk of myocardial infarction associated with non-warfarin anticoagulants (Stroke Prevention with the ORal direct Thrombin Inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial Fibrillation III and IV, RE-LY, Amadeus) or "anticoagulant equivalents" (Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for the prevention of Vascular Events) in patients with atrial fibrillation who are prescribed anticoagulation for stroke thromboprophylaxis. The overall annual event rate for those receiving warfarin was 0.98% compared with 1.32% for those receiving comparators. Warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in myocardial infarction (relative risk 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.95), an effect largely driven by the RE-LY trial. Sensitivity analyses, excluding RE-LY, revealed a nonsignificant reduction in myocardial infarctions (relative risk 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.10); an analogous analysis excluding the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for the prevention of Vascular Events demonstrated a significant reduction in myocardial infarctions (relative risk 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-1.00). Warfarin might provide a protective effect against myocardial infarction compared with non-warfarin anticoagulants or "anticoagulation equivalents" in patients with atrial fibrillation who are prescribed anticoagulation for stroke thromboprophylaxis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Biphenyl Compounds; Dabigatran; Humans; Irbesartan; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Tetrazoles; Warfarin

The decline in stroke incidence and mortality in the U.S. over the past 20 years is reaching a plateau, and the number of strokes may actually start to increase as the population ages. However, recent clinical trials have demonstrated that there are numerous opportunities to improve stroke prevention strategies and also opportunities to effectively intervene in and treat acute strokes. For patients with diabetes and for those with prior strokes or transient ischemic attacks, it has become evident that aggressive low-density lipoprotein lowering with statin medications will decrease the risk for total and fatal strokes. Optimal anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for primary and secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is being carefully defined. With numerous novel factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitor drugs completing phase III clinical trials, it is likely that additional oral anticoagulant drugs will be clinically available for stroke prevention soon. Additionally, a major clinical trial is nearing completion that may resolve the role of carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy in primary and secondary stroke prevention. There are recent notable advances in the acute treatment of stroke. It is likely that the time window for thrombolysis for appropriate patients with strokes will be increased from 3 to 4.5 h, permitting the inclusion of more patients in this treatment approach. There is ongoing investigation of intra-arterial thrombolysis and of acute intra-arterial thrombus extraction for treatment of selected patients with strokes. Unlike the progress in treatment of ischemic strokes, treatment of hemorrhagic stroke is progressing more slowly.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetic Angiopathies; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Heart Diseases; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypertension; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Stents; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic Therapy; Thrombosis; United States; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a chaotic and irregular contraction of the atria, remains the most common cardiac arrhythmia affecting up to 1.5 per cent of the world population. It has significant economic and personal implications primarily owing to the associated fivefold increase in risk of thromboembolic stroke. The mainstay of risk reduction therapy remains warfarin, use of which can be limited owing to a multitude of issues ranging from drug and food interactions to under-treatment reflected in sub-therapeutic blood levels despite adequate compliance. Pursuit of novel drug alternatives have led to the licence of a new contender (Dabigatran) with a more attractive pharmacotherapeutic profile, some 50 years after warfarin was introduced for human use. A recent non-pharmacological alternative is the Watchman device which has received licence for use. Tested in the PROTECT-AF study, the Watchman device was found to be non-inferior to warfarin in the occurrence of stroke, cardiovascular or unexplained death, or systemic emboli for up to 3 years with less intracranial haemorrhages. The events in the watchman group occurred early and were related to the procedure. These peri-procedural complications are likely to diminish with improved operator experience and ongoing development of the technology. For now, patients with AF who would benefit tremendously from but cannot be treated with warfarin owing to contraindication to, or intolerance of, anticoagulation are considered for device implantation. Despite promising new pharmacotherapeutic advances in the prevention of strokes related to AF, it has taken 50 years for alternative non-pharmacological approaches to become available for clinical use.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Heart Atria; Humans; Prostheses and Implants; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is a common condition that increases the risk of stroke in many patients. Although warfarin has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke, many patients who might benefit from anticoagulation do not receive this therapy. Fear of bleeding is the most often cited reason. Several new anticoagulant medications are being studied to determine their efficacy and safety relative to warfarin. Unlike earlier trials that established the superiority of warfarin over placebo, recent trials in atrial fibrillation have enrolled a disproportionate number of patients already taking warfarin. This review suggests that the risk of both haemorrhage and stroke are highest when atrial fibrillation is newly diagnosed and during the initiation of anticoagulant medication. Randomised controlled trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new anti-thrombotic agents should include substantial numbers of patients without prior exposure to anticoagulation since these individuals are at the highest risk for bleeding and thromboembolism.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Absorption is a critical component of the pharmacokinetics for solid dosage forms administered orally. Many barriers must be overcome in order for a drug molecule to reach its effect site. To effectively address each of these barriers, drug-specific properties, formulation issues, and (patho)physiological changes in the gastrointestinal tract must be considered. First-pass metabolism in the gut and/or liver can dictate the extent to which a drug reaches the systemic circulation. Drug-metabolizing enzymes in the gut and liver are very susceptible to inhibition by other drugs, increasing the risk of drug interactions. In this paper, we will discuss absorption-related issues for solid dosage forms used in the management of stroke patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Dipyridamole; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Warfarin is commonly used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, patients on haemodialysis may not derive the same benefit from warfarin as the general population. There are no randomized controlled studies in dialysis patients which demonstrate the efficacy of warfarin in preventing stroke. In fact, warfarin places the dialysis patient at increased risk for haemorrhagic stroke and possibly ischaemic stroke. Additionally, warfarin increases the risk of major bleeding and has been associated with vascular calcification. Routine use of warfarin in dialysis for stroke prevention should be discouraged, and therapy should only be reserved for dialysis patients at high risk for thrombo-embolic stroke and carefully monitored if implemented.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke is the third leading cause of mortality and is one of the leading cause of disability in the world today. Although underused, anticoagulation with warfarin is still the treatment of choice for prevention of stroke in patients with AF, though hemorrhage is clearly increased in the anticoagulated patient. The substantial difficulties associated with warfarin use give reasons for the continuing challenge of decision making about antithrombotic therapy. They have led to a search for alternative approaches of stroke prophylaxis resulting in a strategy of mechanically sealing the left atrial appendage (LAA) and excluding it from the systemic circulation. A couple of years ago a percutaneous transcatheter transseptal approach to LAA occlusion has become feasible. Since then, valuable technical knowledge and a proof of concept emerged from clinical trials using three different systems. However, also the intervention bears a risk. Thus, identifying those patients who gain the most from either therapy is crucial which, in the first line, means to calculate the risk of stroke or bleeding. Unfortunately, patients with some defined comorbidities are at risk of both, cerebral embolism or hemorrhage. Whether this target group may benefit from LAA occlusion is a matter of this discussion.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Balloon Occlusion; Cardiac Catheterization; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Risk; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke remains the leading cause of disability and the third leading cause of death. Despite advances in treatment, the early and later outcomes remain poor with a high rate of death and or disability. Strategies for prevention have assumed a central role. Given the close relationship between advancing age, atrial fibrillation, and increasing stroke, there is great interest in this large specific population of patients. Although warfarin has been the cornerstone of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, it is often not used because of absolute or relative contraindications, or is ineffective because of poor control of the international normalized ratio (INR). The relative risk-benefit ratio of stroke prevention versus bleeding hazard plays a central role in therapeutic decisions. New pharmacologic approaches have been studied, most recently direct thrombin inhibitors. These drugs may be associated with less bleeding than warfarin, although there continues to be incremental bleeding risk over a patient's lifetime. In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, device strategies are being tested. These are based upon the information that in such patients, stroke arises from thrombus in the left atrial appendage in 90% of cases. Left atrial appendage occlusion has now been tested in a randomized clinical trial. In this trial, device closure was found to be noninferior to warfarin for prevention of all-cause stroke, cardiac death, and systemic embolization. There was an early safety hazard typically related to periprocedural pericardial effusions; however, subsequent experience has continued to document excellent efficacy and improved safety profiles. New randomized trials and registries continue to explore the potential for device placement as an alternative to anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in this group of patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Randomized trials have demonstrated that warfarin is effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yielding relative risk reductions for ischemic stroke of nearly 70%. However, successful use of warfarin requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment to maintain an international normalized ratio (INR) within the range of 2.0 to 3.0. Many clinicians and patients have been reluctant to use warfarin therapy in AF, with underuse generally attributed to the inconvenience of INR monitoring, complexities of drug and dietary interactions associated with warfarin, and perceived bleeding risk. The ensuing search for safe, effective alternatives with a lower associated risk of bleeding and no need for monitoring and dose adjustment has focused attention on more specific inhibitors of the clotting cascade, such as factor Xa inhibitors or direct thrombin inhibitors. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF. New factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban are also currently being studied in stroke prevention trials in patients with AF to determine their comparability with warfarin. It is anticipated that fixed-dose administration of these new oral agents will provide effective anticoagulation without the need for frequent monitoring and with a lower risk of bleeding events.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac rhythm disturbance arising from disorganized electrical activity in the atria, and it is accompanied by an irregular and often rapid ventricular response. It is the most common clinically significant dysrhythmia in the general and older population.. The authors conducted a MEDLINE search using the key terms "atrial fibrillation," "epidemiology," "pathophysiology," "treatment" and "dentistry." They selected contemporaneous articles published in peer-reviewed journals and gave preference to articles reporting randomized controlled trials.. The anticoagulant warfarin frequently is prescribed to prevent stroke caused by cardiogenic thromboemboli arising from stagnant blood in poorly contracting atria. Most dental procedures and a limited number of surgical procedures can be performed without altering warfarin dosage if the international normalized ratio value is within the therapeutic range of 2.0 to 3.0. Certain analgesic agents, antibiotic agents, antifungal agents and sedative hypnotics, however, should not be prescribed without consultation with the patient's physician because these medications may alter the patient's risk of hemorrhage and stroke.. AF affects nearly 2.5 million Americans, most of who are older than 60 years. Consultation with the patient's physician to discuss the planned dental treatment often is appropriate, especially for people who frequently have comorbid diseases such as coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes and thyrotoxicosis, which are treated with multiple drug regimens.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Contraindications; Dental Care for Chronically Ill; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients at high risk of arterial or venous thromboembolic events often receive chronic treatment with long-term oral anticoagulants such as warfarin. However, if these patients require an invasive procedure, they may require a temporary interruption of their warfarin therapy to minimize their bleeding risk during the procedure. As warfarin has a long half-life and an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile, short-acting parenteral anticoagulants, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), may be of benefit in protecting the patient from thromboemboli while their warfarin dose is withheld. Such "bridging therapy" has traditionally been provided in-hospital with intravenous UFH; however, recent data have suggested that LMWH may be an effective alternative, with potential cost-savings due to the ability to provide bridging therapy in the outpatient setting.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hospital Costs; Humans; Length of Stay; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects a significant proportion of the American population and increases ischemic stroke risk by 4- to 5-fold. Oral vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, can significantly reduce this stroke risk but can be difficult to dose and monitor. Previous research on the effects of setting (e.g., randomized controlled trials, anticoagulation management by specialty clinics, usual care by community physicians) on the proportion of time spent within therapeutic range for the international normalized ratio (INR) has not specifically examined anticoagulation in AF patients.. Use traditional meta-analytic and meta-regressive techniques to evaluate the effect of specialty clinic versus usual care by community physicians on anticoagulation control, measured as the proportion of time spent in therapeutic INR range, for AF patients that received warfarin anticoagulation in the United States.. Studies included in a previously published meta-analysis (van Walraven et al., 2006), which systematically searched reports between 1987 and 2005, were also screened for inclusion in our analysis. A subsequent systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials from January 2005 through February 2008 was conducted. Studies were included if they (a) contained at least 1 warfarin-treated group including more than 25 patients for whom INR control was monitored for at least 3 weeks; (b) included patients treated for AF in the United States; (c) used a patient-time approach (patient-year) to report outcomes; and (d) reported data on the proportion of time spent in traditional therapeutic INR ranges (i.e., a lower limit INR between 1.8 and 2.0 and an upper limit INR between 3.0 and 3.5. Studies with INR goals outside this range were excluded). The proportion of time spent within the therapeutic INR range for each study group was expressed as an incidence density using a person-time approach (in years). All studies were pooled using a random effects model and were weighted by the inverse of the variance of proportion of time spent in the therapeutic range. In order to determine how study setting influenced the proportion of time spent within a therapeutic INR range, both subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted.. This analysis included 8 studies and a total of 14 unique warfarin- treated groups; 3 of the 8 studies and 4 of the warfarin groups were not included in the previous meta-analysis (van Walraven et al., 2006). Overall, patients spent a mean 55% (95% CI = 51%-58%) of their time in the therapeutic INR range. Meta-regression suggested that AF patients treated in a community usual care setting compared with an anticoagulation clinic spent 11% (95% CI = 2%-20%, n = 6 studies with 9 study groups) less time in range.. In the United States, AF patients spend only about one-half the time within therapeutic INR. Anticoagulation clinic services are associated with somewhat better INR control compared with standard community care.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Community Health Centers; Drug Monitoring; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Patient Care Management; Quality of Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation, the most clinically important arrhythmia, is a considerable independent risk factor for the development of stroke. Vitamin K antagonists, primarily warfarin, are the only oral anticoagulants currently available for the long-term prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although there is considerable evidence that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, it is associated with various challenges to its use in routine clinical practice. Numerous studies have shown that it is underused in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly elderly patients who would seem to benefit the most. Many physicians appear hesitant to prescribe warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation because they are unconvinced that the benefits seen in clinical trials will actually translate into their everyday practice. As a result, there is a pressing need for convenient new, well-tolerated and effective oral anticoagulants that do not require frequent dose adjustment and routine coagulation monitoring.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Utilization; Humans; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, may coexist with conditions common to both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Atrial fibrillation is often asymptomatic and diagnosed only when it has caused a potentially serious complication, such as an ischemic stroke. When atrial fibrillation has been identified, 2 objectives have to be addressed--the antiarrhythmic therapy based on rate control or rhythm control, and prevention of thromboembolism. A rhythm or rate control strategy can be chosen indifferently because they have comparable efficacy for the outcome measure of mortality, but the antithrombotic therapy is ever mandatory. The risk of stroke increases cumulatively with increasing age, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, impaired left ventricular function and heart failure. Warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by about two thirds; and aspirin, by about one fifth, but its use must be weighted with the risk of bleeding. The risk of anticoagulant-associated hemorrhage increases with age, the presence of serious concomitant diseases, with poorly controlled hypertension and poorly controlled anticoagulation.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The risks and benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention with atrial fibrillation is clearly delineated in the general population. Little evidence exists for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) about whether the extrapolation of these guidelines is appropriate. In patients with ESRD who are undergoing hemodialysis, the rates for both stroke and bleeding are 3 to 10 times higher than that for the general population. Furthermore, the proportion of hemorrhagic to ischemic strokes has increased, making the decision of whether to initiate anticoagulation problematic. In this commentary, we discuss the existing literature for stroke in atrial fibrillation, stroke type, risk reduction with anticoagulation, and bleeding risks in the hemodialysis population. We comment on validated risk stratification models of stroke prevention and bleeding and their applicability to patients undergoing hemodialysis. Finally, we recommend treatment strategies that are based on the existing state of knowledge.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can significantly increase morbidity and mortality. It is gaining in clinical and economic importance, being the most commonly encountered tachyarrhythmia in clinical practice. Stroke is the most serious complication. Evidence from AF antithrombotic treatment trials is reviewed, risk stratification of patients with AF is discussed, and recommendations for anticoagulation are presented.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Combinations; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cause for thromboembolic stroke. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin is still the most effective therapy in patients with AF, who are at an increased risk for stroke. Nevertheless, warfarin therapy has several limitations; therefore, new anticoagulants like warfarin analogs, thrombin inhibitors, or factor Xa inhibitors have been developed. Some of them are currently being tested in phase III trials in patients with AF. Furthermore, the pathophysiology of prothrombotic endocardial remodeling in fibrillating atria suggests that angiotensin II increases prothrombotic expression of vascular adhesion molecules at the atrial endocardium. Thus, novel anticoagulants or hybrid therapy with a combination of anticoagulants with inhibitors of endocardial remodelling like angiotensin II receptor blockers appear to be attractive future perspective approaches.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

A major challenge facing the physician evaluating patients with transient ischemic attack is determining which patients are at highest short-term risk of stroke. A number of stratification schemes have been recently developed incorporating easily obtainable clinical information about the individual patient. Further, emerging data suggest a role for brain and vascular imaging in risk stratification. Many aspects of acute management of transient ischemic attack, such as which patients should be hospitalized and choice of acute antithrombotic therapy, remain controversial because of a lack of evidence from controlled trials. For longer-term prevention, there is much firmer evidence from multiple large randomized trials, and these data are reviewed in this article.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke remains an increasing worldwide cause of disability and mortality, and it is the second leading cause of death in industrialized countries. Patients with atrial fibrillation form a unique group with increased risk of cardioembolic stroke. Despite the widespread application of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale and guidelines, patients with atrial fibrillation represent a clinically challenging group that deserves a special approach during the acute stroke phase. The mechanism of stroke in these patients is either cardioembolic [especially with an international normalized ratio (INR) < 2.0] or hemorrhagic (especially with INR > 5.0) (Figure 1). Atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease significantly increases the risk for ischemic stroke. Specifically, patients with mitral stenosis who develop atrial fibrillation increase their risk of cardioembolism by 3 to 7 times. Many patients with atrial fibrillation still develop ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke despite appropriate use of anticoagulation. Prior stroke, transient ischemic attacks, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age > 75, and diabetes mellitus are all well-established risk factors for the development of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The CHADS-2 score is the most widely studied and clinically used method for stratifying patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. In our review, we present the most recent clinical guidelines and trends for the approach to and management of this patient group.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor VIIa; Heparin; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Plasma; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid syndrome is considered to be associated with a hypercoagulable state that leads to stroke and other ischemic events, and is currently diagnosed based on the modified Sapporo criteria that was proposed in 2006. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) comprise a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies. Among them, the level of beta2-glycoprotein I-dependent anticardiolipin antibody, lupus anticoagulant (LA), and IgG anticardiolipin antibody are commonly measured. Recently, phosphatidylserine dependent anti-prothrombin antibody has been suggested to be closely related to LA. aPL is an independent risk factor for a first-ever ischemic stroke, especially in young female patients. It is still debatable whether aPL is a marker for recurrent stroke risk. The precipitating factors for the occurrence of stroke are beta2-GPI-dependent aCL, aGPL, and aCL levels of greater than 40, and the simultaneous presence of LA. Several mechanisms are considered to be involved in the thrombotic process in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Activation of protein C is impaired in patients with aPL. Beta2-GPI has simultaneous procoagulant and anticoagulant effects. Cardiac valvular involvement, which could be the cause of cardiogenic embolism, is prevalent in patients with aCL. In addition, the presence of aPL is associated with the development of atherosclerosis. Recently, it has been proposed that endothelial cells, monocytes, and platelets were reported to be activated by beta2-GPI: further, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase has been reported to be phosphorylated. Several therapeutic options are available for the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with aPL. For cases of cryptogenic ischemic stroke and positive aPL antibodies, antiplatelet therapy is reasonable. Oral anticoagulation with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3 is reasonable for patients with ischemic stroke who meet the criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome with venous and arterial occlusive disease in multiple organs.

Topics: Age of Onset; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Heparin; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

There is little consensus on the optimal perioperative management for most patients on oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. Bridging therapy is not recommended for the majority of patients on oral anticoagulation as most are at low risk for perioperative stroke. Though most clinicians choose an aggressive perioperative strategy for patients with high thromboembolic risk (e.g., mechanical mitral valve replacement) by withholding warfarin perioperatively and the use of full-dose heparin, prophylactic dose heparin is given for lower risk cagegories (e.g., bileaflet aortic valve replacement and atrial fibrillation). The amount of increase in postoperative major bleeding when full-dose anticoagulation is administered soon after surgery is the factor in the decision with the least available data. The optimal method for returning the International Normalized Ratio (INR) to the desired range preoperatively depends upon its degree of initial elevation and whether or not clinically significant bleeding is present. Rapid reversal of excessive anticoagulation should be undertaken in patients with serious bleeding at any degree of anticoagulation. Vitamin K therapy is an effective treatment for INR prolongation in patients with vitamin K-associated coagulopathy; coagulation factor replacement is required, in addition, in patients with major bleeding or with an indication for immediate correction of their INR. Patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrate have a more rapid and more complete reversal of their anticoagulation as compared with fresh frozen plasma.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cohort Studies; Coumarins; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Perioperative Care; Plasma; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Clinical trials during the past 20 years have revolutionized the antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation. Based on consideration of 30 randomized trials involving 29,017 participants, adjusted-dose warfarin remains the most efficacious prophylaxis against stroke for atrial fibrillation patients at moderate-to-high risk (compared with antiplatelet agents, warfarin reduces stroke by about 40%). The optimal INR for prevention of stroke for most atrial fibrillation patients is probably 2.0-2.5; INRs of 1.6-1.9 provide substantial protection, 80-90% of that afforded by higher intensities. Warfarin-associated intracerebral hemorrhage is an increasing problem as more elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are anticoagulated. Modest reductions in blood pressure results in large decreases in this most dreaded complication of warfarin; anticoagulation of elderly atrial fibrillation patients should be accompanied by a firm commitment to control hypertension. Warfarin-associated intracerebral hemorrhage has a 50% early mortality. A wide range of acute treatments to urgently reverse anticoagulation have been recommended by experts, but prevention is a far better option than treatment of this devastating problem.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate data addressing use of anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), in particular those at risk of falls.. Primary literature was identified through PubMed MEDLINE (1966-December 2007) and EMBASE (1980-December 2007) using the search terms anticoagulation, warfarin, aspirin, elderly, falls, older persons, atrial fibrillation, bleeding, education, stroke, and use. Additional references were obtained through review of references from articles obtained.. Clinical studies evaluating warfarin and aspirin efficacy in AF, as well as studies evaluating anticoagulation and falls, elderly patients, and bleeding were considered for inclusion. Selection emphasis was placed on randomized studies of AF and those evaluating anticoagulation and falls.. Uncertainties over the optimal treatment for elderly patients with AF still exist. Variance in the guidelines is reflected in current practice, as some discrepancies are present. Warfarin is underprescribed in elderly patients, with only about 50% of eligible patients receiving therapy. Falls are most often cited as the reason for not using anticoagulants in an elderly patient. Three risk-benefit analyses have been performed, and all found that despite risks associated with warfarin, its benefits outweigh its risks even in patients who fall. Warfarin should be used rather than aspirin or no therapy in elderly patients at risk of falls. Anticoagulation education has been shown to reduce the risk of bleeding in the elderly and should be a vital part of warfarin management.. The risk of falls alone should not automatically disqualify a person from being treated with warfarin. While falls should not dictate anticoagulant choice, assessment and management of fall risk should be an important part of anticoagulation management. Efforts should be made to minimize fall risk.

Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin is highly effective at reducing the risk of stroke in AF. The benefit of oral anticoagulant therapy strongly outweighs the risk in most patients who have AF. More data are needed to define the overall risk-to-benefit ratio better for patients aged 80 years and older. Because a significant proportion of elderly individuals may not be optimal candidates for anticoagulant therapy, we must continue to evaluate alternative stroke prevention strategies while redoubling our efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying AF and thrombogenesis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In July 2005, leaders from academia, government, and industry convened in Washington, DC, to discuss key issues in the development of antithrombotic treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition to summarizing available data on the relative benefits and risks of currently available therapies in diverse clinical practice settings, we reviewed designs of ongoing trials and registries, focusing on areas of methodological controversy and uncertainty. Participants in this meeting described the growing burden of AF, summarized the data showing effectiveness of warfarin for prevention of stroke in AF, and noted that warfarin is both underused and poorly monitored and adjusted in general practice. There was consensus that there is an important unmet clinical need for better treatment of patients with AF at risk of stroke, including alternatives to warfarin that address its limitations. Comparative noninferiority trials to develop alternatives to warfarin must include warfarin management that is at least as good as that provided in historical trials. There was agreement that noninferiority trials can be done based on historical warfarin trials, and that placebo-controlled trials focused on patients not receiving warfarin in general practice can provide important information as well. Statistical principles for noninferiority in this setting were discussed, and a standard approach was proposed. A majority of clinical trial representatives suggested that large, simple, open-label trials would provide the most meaningful information relevant to future practice, but regulators cautioned that, in such a simple trial, one needs to ensure that the control group does at least as well as the historical controls for the noninferiority design to be interpretable. With this summary document, we hope to provide a helpful resource for future drug development for AF.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Design; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Research Design; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a small molecule, direct Factor Xa inhibitor and may be a potentially attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban is being investigated for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. A broad search of Medline, clinicaltrials.gov and the annual proceedings of the American Society of Hematology and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis was conducted. This review addresses the findings of this systematic search, including the need for new oral anticoagulants, the development and pharmacology of rivaroxaban, and the results of completed as well as ongoing trials with rivaroxaban. At present, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism has been evaluated in Phase II and Phase III trials involving over 24,000 patients. Additionally, rivaroxaban is being evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes and the prevention of stroke and non-central nervous system embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The drug may have its greatest impact in providing a much-needed and attractive alternative to warfarin. Further data (especially large Phase III trials) are required.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Binding Sites; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Rats; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

As many as one in four patients over age 40 will develop atrial fibrillation (AF), a significant risk factor for stroke. Although most clinicians are aware of the benefits of antithrombotic therapy, especially warfarin, for prevention of stroke, current guidelines for selection of antithrombotic therapy are confusing and inconsistently applied. The CHADS2 risk-stratification scheme, based on a clinical history of heart failure, hypertension, age >75, diabetes, or prior stroke, is a useful clinical tool to identify patients likely to benefit from warfarin, distinguishing these patients from patients at lower risk for whom aspirin is sufficient. Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage include anticoagulation intensity, hypertension, age, and previous stroke or cerebrovascular disease. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and leukoaraiosis identified by high-resolution brain imaging are under investigation, but better schemes for stratifying bleeding risk are needed. In the future, new anticoagulants that are safer and easier to administer than warfarin will improve the benefit/risk burden for elderly patients with AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Geriatrics; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with a substantial risk of thromboembolism and stroke. Despite numerous disadvantages that limit its efficacy and safety, warfarin is widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism related with atrial fibrillation. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor has the potential to be an alternative choice in the prevention and therapy of thromboembolism related with atrial fibrillation. Studies compared ximelagatran with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke showed that fixed dose oral ximelagatran is effective as adjusted dose warfarin in stroke prevention. Ximelagatran has numerous advantages over warfarin in clinical practice. Although it seems as a promising option for the prevention and therapy of thromboembolism, its safety and efficacy need to be determined definitely by further clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Here we describe an 8-year old male child with homozygous sickle cell disease who presented with left parietal skull bone infarction and, during his stay in hospital, developed a right femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT), both uncommon complications of the disease. He initially presented with severe headache and generalised tenderness of the calvarium, which did not respond to simple analgesics. Scalp swelling in and around the left frontal (including left orbit) and parietal regions developed 24 h after presentation. The differential diagnosis included incipient stroke, acute sickle bone crisis and osteomyelitis, with a possible complication of epidural haematoma, or orbital compression syndrome. An initial exchange blood transfusion did not lead to appreciable reduction in opiate requirements. Significant symptomatic relief was attained only after a second exchange transfusion. The DVT developed at the site of catheterisation (right femoral vein), and this was treated with maximal doses of enoxaparin followed by warfarin. The child is now well and off anti-coagulants. In this article we present a review of the literature and discuss possible mechanisms of these complications in our patient.

Topics: Anemia, Sickle Cell; Anticoagulants; Catheterization; Child; Diagnosis, Differential; Edema; Enoxaparin; Exchange Transfusion, Whole Blood; Femoral Vein; Headache; Humans; Infarction; Male; Osteomyelitis; Parietal Bone; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Thrombophlebitis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is a strong independent risk factor for stroke.. To characterize the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic agents for stroke prevention in patients who have atrial fibrillation, adding 13 recent randomized trials to a previous meta-analysis.. Randomized trials identified by using the Cochrane Stroke Group search strategy, 1966 to March 2007, unrestricted by language.. All published randomized trials with a mean follow-up of 3 months or longer that tested antithrombotic agents in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. Two coauthors independently extracted information regarding interventions; participants; and occurrences of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, major extracranial bleeding, and death.. Twenty-nine trials included 28,044 participants (mean age, 71 years; mean follow-up, 1.5 years). Compared with the control, adjusted-dose warfarin (6 trials, 2900 participants) and antiplatelet agents (8 trials, 4876 participants) reduced stroke by 64% (95% CI, 49% to 74%) and 22% (CI, 6% to 35%), respectively. Adjusted-dose warfarin was substantially more efficacious than antiplatelet therapy (relative risk reduction, 39% [CI, 22% to 52%]) (12 trials, 12 963 participants). Other randomized comparisons were inconclusive. Absolute increases in major extracranial hemorrhage were small (< or =0.3% per year) on the basis of meta-analysis.. Methodological features and quality varied substantially and often were incompletely reported.. Adjusted-dose warfarin and antiplatelet agents reduce stroke by approximately 60% and by approximately 20%, respectively, in patients who have atrial fibrillation. Warfarin is substantially more efficacious (by approximately 40%) than antiplatelet therapy. Absolute increases in major extracranial hemorrhage associated with antithrombotic therapy in participants from the trials included in this meta-analysis were less than the absolute reductions in stroke. Judicious use of antithrombotic therapy importantly reduces stroke for most patients who have atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Warfarin

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterised by autoantibody production and vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Autoantibodies generated against phospholipid and phospholipid-binding proteins often impair phospholipid-dependent clotting assays (lupus anticoagulants). These autoantibodies activate endothelial cells, platelets and biochemical cascades and can exist in autoimmune disorders such as lupus. Consistently positive antibodies may worsen the severity of thrombo-occlusive disease. The most common neurological manifestations of APS include stroke and transient ischaemic attacks due to arterial thromboses. Antiphospholipid antibodies may cause additional neurological impairments through both vascular and immune mechanisms. Antiaggregant or anticoagulant therapies are indicated for APS-related ischaemic strokes. Treatment regimens for asymptomatic antibody-positive patients and those with refractory disease remain controversial. There is scant literature on neurological APS manifestations in paediatric patients. Assessment of traditional cardiovascular and inherited thrombophilia risk factors is essential in patients with APS. Modifiable risk factors and valvular heart disease may worsen thrombotic and cerebrovascular outcomes. Alternative therapies such as statins, anti-malarials, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and thrombin inhibitors warrant further research.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Humans; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Electrocardiography; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), which comprises 15 percent to 30 percent of all strokes, has an estimated incidence of 37,000 cases per year. One third of patients are actively bleeding when they present to the emergency department, and hematoma growth during the first hours after ICH onset is thought to be a prime determinant of clinical deterioration. Inflammation, as opposed to ischemia, also negatively affects patient condition. Recombinant activated factor VII is emerging as a potential first-line therapy, especially in warfarin-associated hemorrhage. Corticosteroid therapy is not supported by contemporary studies or by current management guidelines. Aggressive blood pressure reduction is under investigation. Surgical intervention has shown no statistically significant benefit over medical management for patients with ICH in general, although subgroup analysis in a large randomized trial suggested potential benefits from surgery for patients with lobar ICH. Not long ago, ICH was considered virtually untreatable. Diligent efforts in both bench and clinical research are generating hope for patients who experience this catastrophic event.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Pressure; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Coagulants; Factor VII; Factor VIIa; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Warfarin

Recombinant factor VIIa has been increasingly used to provide hemostasis in nonapproved indications. This trend has resulted in concerns about safety, efficacy and costs.. Recombinant factor VIIa seems to have hemostatic effects in posttrauma and perisurgery excessive bleeding, although further studies are required. Recombinant factor VIIa may be used to reverse the effect of warfarin or other vitamin K-antagonist therapy following vitamin K administration. Some beneficial effects have also been suggested in a limited number of patients with liver disease and hemorrhagic stroke. Recombinant factor VIIa should be used with caution in cases with known hypercoagulability, excessive bleeding in the setting of disseminated intravascular coagulation or other states of generalized activation of the hemostatic system. In most of the nonapproved cases, a 4.8-mg vial administered to an adult patient weighing 50-100 kg to achieve a 50-100 microg/kg dose is recommended.. While consensus recommendations on the use of recombinant factor VIIa in nonapproved settings have been developed, more studies are needed to define dose and timing in these diverse patient populations. For now, decisions about off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa remain at the physician's discretion, assisted by hospital pharmacotherapeutic or transfusion committees.

Topics: Adult; Consensus; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation; Drug Antagonism; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Factor VIIa; Hemostasis; Hospitals; Humans; Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This is a review of stroke mechanisms and management. The concept of stroke and transient ischemic attack and the recently proposed revision in definitions and controversies are discussed. We also discuss the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs for stroke due to carotid and cardiac disease.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Chronic Disease; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly due to stroke and thromboembolism. Anticoagulant therapy reduces the risk of stroke, and the greatest benefit is seen in patients at highest absolute risk. Aspirin is a less effective alternative, and any benefit of aspirin might be due to its favourable effects on arterial thrombosis caused by vascular disease. However, anticoagulant therapy remains underused, particularly in the elderly, who probably have the most to gain from stroke prevention owing to their high absolute risk. The underuse of anticoagulation might also be related to uncertain risk of thromboembolism in individual patients and a perceived overestimation of the benefit and underestimation of risk of bleeding with warfarin in clinical trials. In this Review, we summarise the data for and against warfarin and aspirin therapies and discuss the clinical assessments and risk stratifications that guide the use of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Possible barriers to the uptake of anticoagulation therapy are also discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Warfarin

We presented a patient suffered from stroke related to thalidomide therapy. The patient was a 74-year-old man who had about two-year history of multiple myeloma and treated with 100 mg of oral thalidomide daily. He was diagnosed as having cryptogenic stroke attributable to patent foramen ovale, when he admitted to our hospital with sudden onset left-side hemiparesis. Antiplatelet and neuroprotective therapies were commenced along with the use of elastic stocking to prevent further embolic event. Then, warfarin was selected as secondary prevention to reduce the risk of paradoxical embolism during thalidomide therapy. Although the risk of deep vein thrombosis on thalidomide therapy has been well documented, only a few cases have been noted documenting the risk of stroke during thalidomide therapy. We need to be careful about the risk of deep vein thrombosis on thalidomide therapy, even as monotherapy, and consider using anticoagulant therapy while prescribing thalidomide.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Embolism, Paradoxical; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma; Neuroprotective Agents; Risk; Stockings, Compression; Stroke; Thalidomide; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

To compare the effectiveness of aspirin, warfarin, and ximelagatran as thromboprophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials in patients with NVAF treated with adjusted-dose warfarin and aspirin, fixed low-dose (FLD) warfarin, ximelagatran or placebo. Outcome measures studied were ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, mortality and haemorrhage. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model.. We identified 13 trials (n=14,423 participants) of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. Adjusted-dose warfarin significantly reduced the risk of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism compared with aspirin (relative risk [RR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40 to 0.86), FLD warfarin (RR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.58), or placebo (RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.45). However, aspirin and placebo had a lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin (RR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.97 and RR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.82, respectively). The oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran was as effective as adjusted-dose warfarin in the prevention of ischaemic strokes or systemic emboli (RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.40) with less risk of major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.96). Adjusted-dose warfarin significantly reduced mortality compared to placebo (RR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.89), but not for any of the other comparisons (aspirin: RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.13; FLD warfarin: RR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.52; ximelagatran: RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.26).. We have extended previous analyses, making this the largest systematic review and meta-analysis of thromboprophylaxis trial data in AF--and have included recent trials with the new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran. This systematic review confirms the superiority of anticoagulation therapy over aspirin as thromboprophylaxis in patients with NVAF. The new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, appears as effective as adjusted-dose warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in NVAF, with a lower risk of bleeding.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Drug Combinations; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this article was to describe (i) the epidemiology and outcomes of stroke relating to diabetes; (ii) the pathophysiology of diabetes as a risk factor for stroke; (iii) the management of acute stroke in patients with diabetes; (iv) the evidence of primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with diabetes; and (v) the risk of new-onset diabetes using older antihypertensive agents. The combination of diabetes and stroke disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Evidence from large clinical trials performed in patients with diabetes supports the need for aggressive and early intervention to target patients' cardiovascular (CV) risks in order to prevent the onset, recurrence and progression of acute stroke. Identification of at-risk patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome has also allowed the delivery of early and effective intervention to reduce stroke risks, while active treatment during the acute phase of stroke will reduce long-term neurological and functional deficits. While the ongoing debate on the risk benefits of different antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and antiplatelet agents should not detract clinicians from pursuing aggressive CV risk reduction, the application of evidence-based medicine specifically in patients with diabetes will facilitate the use of appropriate agents to improve clinical outcomes. The overall management of patients with diabetes and acute stroke or at risk of secondary stroke should also include multifactorial intervention that not only targets patient's CV risk but also includes behavioural, lifestyle and, where appropriate, surgical intervention.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Carotid Stenosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dyslipidemias; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypertension; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Smoking Cessation; Stroke; Warfarin

The antiphospholipid syndrome is described with a review of its historical development as a recognized syndrome, what constitutes an antiphospholipid antibody, how it is measured, and how the syndrome is treated. Antiphospholipid antibodies are actually antibodies to a protein, most often beta-2-glycoprotein 1, that is usually bound to a phospholipid. Some antibodies are directed towards lipid-bound prothrombin. The antibodies are measured by immunologic assays or by antibody-dependent abnormalities detected in coagulation assays. Although they prolong coagulation assays, they are associated with a thrombotic tendency rather than a bleeding disorder. There are numerous postulated mechanisms to account for the thrombotic tendency. Patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome are treated with long-term oral anticoagulation to prolong the INR to 2.0 to 3.0. For most patients, a more intense level of treatment with a higher INR is not needed.

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; beta 2-Glycoprotein I; Enoxaparin; False Positive Reactions; Female; Glycoproteins; Humans; Stroke; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Despite the significant advances over the last 50 years with regard to anticoagulant therapy, warfarin remains the definitive standard for the long-term prevention of thromboembolic events in at-risk patients, except those with acute coronary syndromes, in which antiplatelets are preferred. Ximelagatran, a prodrug of melagatran, is an orally administered direct thrombin inhibitor whose therapeutic potential has been investigated in venous thromboembolism, acute coronary syndromes and prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation. Clinical studies have demonstrated ximelagatran to be comparable in efficacy to the oral vitamin K antagonist warfarin and low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, comparable to warfarin for stroke prevention in the setting of atrial fibrillation, and, when combined with aspirin, more effective than aspirin alone at preventing major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction. Double-blind trials have also revealed the efficacy of ximelagatran in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and shown the agent to be as effective as enoxaparin/warfarin in treating patients with acute deep vein thrombosis. Adverse effects with ximelagatran include elevations in alanine transaminase (ALT), which may require monitoring, and bleeding complications. Bleeding complications appear to be less than or at least comparable to those occurring with standard anticoagulant treatments like warfarin or low molecular weight heparin. In addition to its favorable efficacy and safety profile in comparison with standard anticoagulant therapy, the convenience of its oral, fixed-dose administration without the need for anticoagulation monitoring might help encourage a wider use of appropriate anticoagulation using ximelagatran across the population at risk, reducing the incidence of thromboembolic events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Because presently available antiarrhythmic drugs are neither as highly efficacious nor as safe as desirable for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF), rate control-versus-rhythm control trials for the treatment of AF were evaluated. They demonstrated that rate control is not simply a therapeutic fallback option if rhythm control should fail, but rather, it is a legitimate primary therapeutic option. Nevertheless, there remain many reasons to consider maintenance of sinus rhythm (rhythm control) over AF (rate control) if only there were antiarrhythmic agents that could provide this treatment more effectively and safely. In fact, an important analysis of the AFFIRM trial data indicated that rhythm control offers a significant survival advantage over rate control if it could be safely achieved. Therein lie an important clinical dilemma and an unmet need. Sinus rhythm is good, but we need better ways to maintain it effectively and safely.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The use of warfarin in the elderly, particularly for stroke prevention in chronic atrial fibrillation, is steadily increasing. Although the benefits of warfarin are greatest in the elderly, so are the risk of adverse outcomes and the difficulties of anticoagulant management. Clinical systems need to improve to counter this therapeutic dilemma, as warfarin is likely to remain the only widely available oral anticoagulant for the foreseeable future. Aspects that require attention are: the careful selection of patients in whom treatment with warfarin is appropriate; initiating therapy in a low dose (e.g., 2.5-5 mg/day); thorough education of patients and carers; close monitoring, especially with any change in the patient's regular drug therapy; involving patients more in the management of their warfarin therapy (self-monitoring/management in suitable patients); and ongoing review of the appropriateness of therapy as circumstances change.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Fractures, Bone; Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Dentists rely on general practitioners to manage a patient's warfarin dose before uncomplicated dental extraction.. This article compares common practice of warfarin management with the available clinical evidence.. Common practice lags more than 20 years behind clinical evidence to the detriment of patients, and with medicolegal consequences for doctors.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Mitral Valve; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Tooth Extraction; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of ischemic stroke 5-fold and may not only be responsible for as many as 15% of all strokes that occur but also for larger and more disabling strokes than those attributable to other causes which increase the associated costs of care. Anticoagulation with warfarin in the target INR of 2.5 is a major clinical challenge in real-life practice, given that the complex relationship between warfarin dosage and response is readily altered by a variety of factors such as concurrent medications, illnesses, genetic influences, and dietary/lifestyle changes. Consequently, INR values are out of the target range approximately half of the time in real-life studies compared to clinical trial setting. Current anticoagulation therapies are less likely to be cost-effective in routine clinical practice and need improvement. The aim of this review is to discuss the pharmacoeconomic consequences of this management strategy by analysing the optimal treatment option within specific age and risk groups, confirming current guidelines for a health economic perspective and considering the economic impact on health care policy.. An electronic search of the Medline/PubMed database from 1966 to 2005 was performed to identify articles dealing with all pharmacoeconomic aspects of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. The following search terms were used: 'atrial fibrillation', 'stroke', 'cost', 'warfarin'.. Treatment with warfarin is cost-effective (versus aspirin or no therapy) in patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke. The cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy is driven by the achieved risk reduction rather than the potential benefits estimated from clinical trials. Failure to maintain optimal anticoagulation places patients at risk of complications, the management of which is a significant cost driver.. Improvement could be achieved by optimising physicians and patient's knowledge driven through prevention campaigns by health care policy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Health Care Costs; Humans; Models, Economic; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation and severe carotid artery stenosis are the most common causes of stroke. However, several patients recognize unusual cause for their cerebral ischemia. At the beginning of the last decade after the introduction of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and other imaging techniques, atheromatosis of the thoracic aorta has been recognized as an important source of stroke or systemic embolism. Formerly in the pre-TEE era, this entity was included into cryptogenic strokes. Notably, aortic atheromas are found in about one quarter of patients presenting with embolic events and their grading by TEE correlates with the risk of future embolism, especially if mobile lesions or superimposed thrombi are present. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of aortic atheroma is mostly established when an embolic event has already occurred. The aim of this paper is to review the current evidence for aortic atheroma as an important independent risk factor for stroke, and to discuss the potential therapeutic options. Unfortunately, randomized studies addressing the treatment of patients with severe aortic atheroma are not yet completed. Furthermore, although warfarin and statins look promising in several retrospective series, their results are by most controversial so far. In conclusion, although the diagnostic criteria and the negative prognostic significance of aortic atheroma are almost defined, its therapeutic options are far to be clear. Therefore, clinical trials addressing this relevant pathologic condition are urgently needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Diseases; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Clopidogrel; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to identify different stroke prevention treatments for atrial fibrillation assessed in randomized controlled trials and to compare them within a single evidence synthesis framework.. We updated the Cochrane review on anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy for nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation to include randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and March 2005 identified via the CENTRAL database and MEDLINE. A mixed-treatment comparison method was used to combine direct within-trial, between-treatment comparisons with indirect trial evidence while maintaining randomization.. Data were combined from 19 clinical trials that included 17 833 patients randomized to 9 treatment strategies, including placebo. For prevention of ischemic stroke, adjusted standard-dose warfarin sodium (relative rate [RR], 0.35; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.24 to 0.52), adjusted low-dose warfarin (RR, 0.35; 95% CrI, 0.19 to 0.60), ximelagatran (RR, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.18 to 0.61), and aspirin (RR, 0.64; 95% CrI, 0.44 to 0.88) were all associated with a significantly lower rate of ischemic stroke compared with placebo. For major and fatal bleeding episodes, there was some evidence of an increased risk for all treatments but none were statistically significant. Assuming a baseline risk of 51 ischemic stroke events per 1000 person-years, it can be estimated that adjusted standard-dose warfarin could prevent 28 (95% CrI, -37 to -19) ischemic strokes at the expense of 11 (95% CrI, -1 to +39) major or fatal bleeding episodes. In comparison, aspirin could prevent 16 (95% CrI, -26 to -5) ischemic strokes at the expense of 6 (95% CrI, -3 to +27) major or fatal bleeding episodes.. A lower rate of ischemic stroke and a higher rate of major bleeding episodes were found to be associated with oral anticoagulants compared with aspirin, and both anticoagulants and aspirin were found to be associated with a reduction in the rate of stroke compared with placebo.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Incidence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Aortic atheromatous disease is associated with stroke in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. In addition to atheromatous deposits, a reduction in the compliance of the aorta takes place as elastin fibers are replaced by collagen fibers. Both of these distinct processes, termed atherosclerosis, can easily be measured using transesophageal echocardiography during cardiac surgery. A review of the literature demonstrates many studies supporting the benefit of transesophageal echocardiography examination of the aorta for reducing stroke following cardiac surgery, through modification of surgical techniques. There have also been attempts by surgeons to remove atheromatous lesions from the aorta during cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, these procedures currently have a high perioperative mortality. Finally, medical therapy such as warfarin or statins may help reduce the incidence of stroke following heart surgery.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aorta; Aortic Diseases; Atherosclerosis; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endarterectomy; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ultrasonography; Warfarin

A 49-year-old Caucasian man with antiphospholipid syndrome who experienced an ischemic stroke required multidisciplinary decisions regarding acute and long-term care. The patient first received warfarin and unfractionated heparin, followed by low-molecular-weight heparin. However, he developed complications from these drugs (warfarin-induced necrosis and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), resulting in thigh necrosis and multiple additional cerebral and peripheral infarcts. His condition improved after warfarin and the heparins were discontinued, and a direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, was given intravenously for acute treatment. Argatroban is the only anticoagulant known to be safe in patients who experience an acute ischemic stroke in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. For long-term anticoagulation, fondaparinux, an indirect, selective factor Xa inhibitor, was given subcutaneously. The patient received intravenous dexamethasone, later changed to azathioprine, for immunomodulatory treatment. He had significant improvement in his neurologic deficits without recurrent events over the next 18 months. Management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is complex and challenging, and therapeutic strategies need to be evaluated further.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Arginine; Azathioprine; Brain Ischemia; Dexamethasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pipecolic Acids; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pooled data from trials comparing antithrombotic treatment with placebo have shown that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 62%, and that aspirin alone reduces the risk by 22%. Overall, in high-risk patients, warfarin is superior to aspirin in preventing strokes, with a relative risk reduction of 36%. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was found to be as efficient as vitamin K antagonist drugs in the prevention of embolic events, but has been recently withdrawn because of abnormal liver function tests. The ACTIVE-W (Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events) study has demonstrated that warfarin is superior to platelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) in the prevention af embolic events. Idraparinux, a Factor Xa inhibitor, is being evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor-blocking drugs hold promise in atrial fibrillation through cardiac remodelling. Preliminary studies suggest that statins could interfere with the risk of recurrence after electrical cardioversion. Finally, percutaneous methods for the exclusion of left atrial appendage are under investigation in high-risk patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

There is overwhelming evidence from randomized trials and systematic reviews to indicate the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. In moderate- to high-risk subjects, oral anticoagulation with warfarin reduces stroke by two-thirds, while aspirin reduces stroke by 22%. The latter result is similar to that seen for stroke reduction with antiplatelet therapy in vascular disease. Numerous studies have shown that less than half the patients eligible for warfarin therapy actually receive it and under- or overanticoagulation is common. This leads to many missed opportunities in optimizing stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. The limitations of existing oral anticoagulants have resulted in the development of many new drugs. The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, and the opportunities for improvement in the provision made for thromboprophylaxis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Aspirin; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reference Standards; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Warfarin is exceedingly effective and underutilized in treating atrial fibrillation. Recently completed studies of alternative therapies include trials of ximelagatran versus warfarin, antiplatelet therapy plus lower-intensity warfarin versus usual warfarin, and strategies of rhythm versus rate control. Results of these studies suggest new options for treatment, and caveats regarding those who appear to have durable sinus rhythm. Ongoing trials include studies of combined antiplatelet therapy and other antithrombins. Nonpharmacologic approaches include the Maze III procedure and similar operations, left atrial appendage obliteration, and catheter-based radiofrequency ablation procedures. The place of these latter therapies will only be defined through subsequent clinical trials.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) tend to be worse than those in patients without AF. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the cost benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF may currently be underestimated by existing economic models that do not distinguish between different stroke outcomes.. A literature review was conducted in 3 areas: (1) studies comparing stroke outcomes in AF and non-AF patients; (2) studies providing long-term cost of stroke estimates; and (3) studies modeling the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (eg, warfarin) in AF patients.. There is considerable evidence that stroke in AF patients has a worse outcome than in patients without AF, including higher mortality, severity, and recurrence rates, and greater functional impairment and dependency. Estimates of the long-term cost of stroke of different severities were between US 24,991 dollars for a mild stroke over 5 years and US 142,251 dollars for a major ischemic stroke over a lifetime (2004 prices). The cost of a severe ischemic stroke may typically be 3-times that of mild stroke. However, cost-effectiveness models for anticoagulation in patients with AF have used average (not AF-specific) cost-of-stroke data, and most have used stroke severity distributions derived from clinical trials, which may differ from those in clinical practice.. Existing economic models underestimate the cost benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention because they do not adjust for poorer outcomes associated with cardioembolic strokes.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Ischemia; MEDLINE; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Multivariate Analysis; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Humans; Inflammation; International Normalized Ratio; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conducted to establish whether novel interventions work on average in the patient population, there is a growing desire to move to a more individualized approach to evaluation. The potential benefits and harms of a treatment policy may differ between individuals. If these benefits and harms are not evaluated distinctly, and in a quantitative framework, transparency can be lost in the decision-making process.. Glasziou and Irwig have outlined the concept of net clinical treatment benefit for identifying the patients for whom the potential benefits of treatment outweigh the possible side effects. This study revisits the decision whether to use warfarin to treat atrial fibrillation. In this analysis, RCT and various sorts of observational data are synthesized.. This reanalysis brings into question the conclusions of the original analysis on who would benefit from warfarin; however, caution is advised, due to limitations in the quality of life data available.. A fully realized Bayesian implementation of the model is presented. This provides a framework for including uncertainty related to the estimation of all model parameters, and permits both direct probability statements and credible intervals for specific patient groups to be expressed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Decision Support Techniques; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

The results of recent large clinical trials have modified treatment plans formerly based on inferred mechanisms of ischemic stroke and hazards of certain forms of therapy.. Strong data have emerged to support anticoagulation with warfarin for stroke associated with inferred embolism in a setting of atrial fibrillation. No clear advantage for warfarin over aspirin exists for ischemic stroke in a setting of intracranial atheroma, patent cardiac foramen ovale, or elevated levels of antiphospholipid antibody. Among antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel have a similar recurrent stroke risk. Combination therapies with aspirin and warfarin show no additional benefits with regard to stroke prevention and carry higher risks of hemorrhage. Treatment with aspirin combined with specially formulated long-acting dipyridamole carries a lower risk of stroke than aspirin alone and does not increase the risk of hemorrhage significantly. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel does not reduce the risk of stroke over clopidogrel alone and carries a greater risk of bleeding than clopidogrel alone.. Choice of antithrombotic therapy depends on the etiology of the stroke. Oral anticoagulation treatment is the preferred choice for inferred cardioembolism in the setting of atrial fibrillation, while the varying rates of hemorrhage with oral anticoagulants continue to favor antiplatelet therapy in other settings of inferred etiology. Combinations of antithrombotic therapy vary in their lowering of stroke rate, and some raise the risk of hemorrhage. Insufficient data exist to determine whether antithrombotic therapy combined with antihypertensives, statins or other agents will further reduce the risk of stroke in synergistic or supplemental fashion, or give no additional benefit.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In part VI of a series of papers on epidemiology and drug prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation the authors analyze data of randomized trials comparing various approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation: cardioversion with subsequent use of antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm and control of rate of ventricular rhythm with obligatory concomitant use of anticoagulants. Approach aimed at sinus rhythm maintenance by means of repetitive cardioversions and long term antiarrhythmic therapy has not been associated with lowering of mortality, rates of stroke or other thromboembolic complications. The use of antithrombotic drugs represent a sole reliable method of stroke prevention in patients with persistent and chronic AF. The paper contains consideration of indications for prescription of warfarin and aspirin to these patients.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Agents; Electric Countershock; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Dipyridamole; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Salicylates; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. It is common in the elderly and those with structural heart disease. Clinical classification can be helpful in treatment decisions and the most widely accepted classification scheme (first episode, recurrent paroxysmal, recurrent persistent, permanent) is found in the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines. The pathophysiology of AF remains unclear at this time. It is unlikely that a single pathophysiology is operative in all or even a majority of cases. Therapies to be considered for AF include prevention of thromboembolism, rate control, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. These therapies and specific treatments for these purposes are discussed under these headings, including a section on the relative merits of the rate control and rhythm control strategies. Risk stratification is a fundamental part of the treatment for thromboembolism. When risk warrants treatment, prevention of thromboembolism is achieved either pharmacologically with aspirin, or with warfarin or new agents like ximelagatran, or by nonpharmacological approaches. Schema to assist in risk stratification and selection of appropriate antithrombotic therapy are provided. Recent trials comparing the strategy of rate control to the strategy of rhythm control failed to demonstrate that the rhythm control approach is superior to the rate control approach in patients and therapies studied so far. Rate control is an acceptable primary line of therapy in many patients, particularly the elderly with persistent AF who are not highly symptomatic. However, the risk and benefit of each treatment modality should be individualized according to the patient circumstances and comorbidity. Algorithms to help individualize which of the two strategies to use are provided. There are a number of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies available for rhythm management of AF. Pharmacologic cardioversion is an alternative to electrical cardioversion for recent onset AF but the latter is preferred for persistent AF. Current drug therapy to maintain sinus rhythm is neither highly effective nor completely safe. An algorithm to guide selection of the most appropriate antiarrhythmic drug for an individual patient is provided. Nonpharmacologic therapies for maintenance of sinus rhythm include surgery, radiofrequency ablation, devices, and hybrid (combination) therapies. Much remains to be learned about the role and application of s

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Algorithms; Amiodarone; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Rate; Humans; Recurrence; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac risk factor for stroke. Oral anticoagulants such as the vitamin K antagonist warfarin have been proven effective in reducing the risk of stroke in AF. Warfarin, however, has many disadvantages including the need for coagulation monitoring, a narrow therapeutic index, inter-/intra-patient variability and food-drug interactions. As a result, warfarin is underused in clinical practice and a viable alternative is needed. Ximelagatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is given as a fixed dose, does not have a narrow therapeutic index, has low potential for drug interactions, has no significant food interactions and does not require coagulation monitoring. Ximelagatran has been evaluated in the Stroke Prevention using an ORal direct Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) trial programme, the largest clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF to date. The phase III trials, SPORTIF III and V, compared ximelagatran (36 mg twice daily) with well-controlled warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) in a combined population of more than 7,000 moderate- to high-risk AF patients. Data from SPORTIF III show an absolute reduction in stroke and systemic embolic events with ximelagatran compared with warfarin at 21 months (1.6 vs. 2.3% per year, respectively; p = 0.10). Preliminary data from SPORTIF V appear to further support non-inferiority between the two agents. On-treatment analysis of the rate of major bleeding events shows an absolute, nonsignificant reduction in the event rate per year with ximelagatran versus warfarin in both studies. The results of SPORTIF III and V demonstrate that a fixed oral dose of ximelagatran, without coagulation monitoring, is comparable to dose-adjusted warfarin in preventing stroke and other thromboembolic complications among moderate- to high-risk AF patients and has a lower rate of both major and minor bleeding. With its positive benefit-risk ratio, ximelagatran may increase the population of eligible patients for anticoagulation with AF and maximize the potential of anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important cause of stroke, and stroke risk stratification is critical to the management of patients with AF. Anticoagulation with warfarin is the current standard of care for stroke prevention in these patients, despite the need for close monitoring. Aspirin alone is not as effective. Warfarin is recommended for patients with AF and valvular disease or with AF and one or more stroke risk factors. Other novel anticoagulants and antiplatelet combinations are under investigation. Curative procedures for AF are possible, but their long-term safety and effect on stroke risk are unknown.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Antithrombotic agents have verified efficacy in reducing the thromboembolic risk associated with atrial fibrillation. This article focuses on the emergence of a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, into the arena of atrial fibrillation thromboprophylaxis. This review does not cover atrial fibrillation in the context of valvular heart disease. The efficacy of aspirin and warfarin will be discussed briefly.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, dosage and administration, contraindications, and adverse effects of ximelagatran are reviewed.. Ximelagatran is the first orally active direct thrombin inhibitor to be tested in Phase III clinical trials. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, melagatran. Melagatran (after oral ximelagatran administration) predictably inhibits thrombin function without need for routine anticoagulation monitoring. Melagatran effectively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin-a potential pharmacodynamic advantage over heparin products. Melagatran has a half-life of 2.4-4.6 hours, necessitating twice-daily administration. Melagatran is primarily eliminated by the kidneys and has not been studied clinically in patients with severe renal failure. Ximelagatran has undergone 10 Phase III trials (6 for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism [VTE] due to orthopedic surgery, 1 for initial treatment of VTE, 1 for long-term prevention of VTE recurrence, and 2 for stroke prophylaxis due to atrial fibrillation). Results were generally positive. AstraZeneca applied in December 2003 for marketing approval of ximelagatran for prevention of VTE after total knee replacement surgery, long-term prevention of VTE recurrence after standard therapy, and stroke prevention due to atrial fibrillation. FDA denied approval of ximelagatran for all indications, mainly because of increased rates of coronary artery disease events in ximelagatran recipients in some studies and the possibility of hepatic failure when the medication is used for long-term therapy.. Ximelagatran has shown promise as a possible alternative to warfarin and other anticoagulants but will require further study to ensure its safety.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (coumarins) are widely-used oral anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism and strokes. Wide inter-individual variation in dose response and frequent bleeds characterize the initiation of coumarin therapy. Over the past 10 years both genetic and nongenetic determinants of coumarin dose response have been identified. A comprehensive pharmacogenetics approach to warfarin therapy has the potential to improve the safety and efficiency of warfarin initiation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Coumarins; Humans; Models, Biological; Pharmacogenetics; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Ximelagatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor that offers numerous potential advantages compared with traditional anticoagulants. It is given orally, has a rapid onset of action, does not require laboratory monitoring, and is not associated with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Numerous phase III trials with ximelagatran focusing on deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis and treatment, stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction have been conducted. Results of these trials indicate that ximelagatran has similar efficacy and risk of bleeding compared with currently used anticoagulants. Accordingly, the potential of this agent to replace warfarin therapy for a variety of indications has been widely touted. Ximelagatran has already been approved in Europe for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery. However, an adverse effect of ximelagatran is liver enzyme elevation, which has been observed in 5% to 10% of patients with chronic administration of the drug. Although initially felt to be transient in nature, subsequent data presented to the Federal Drug Administration suggest a small but real risk of significant hepatotoxicity. These data led the advisory committee to the Federal Drug Administration to recommend against immediate approval of ximelagatran pending further information. The consistent results of completed trials with ximelagatran suggest that it has the potential to be used in many conditions that currently require treatment with warfarin and heparin products. The potential benefit that may be achieved by the replacement of these historically problematic narrow therapeutic index agents must be weighed against as yet undetermined long-term risks of hepatotoxicity.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for stroke that becomes increasingly prevalent as populations age. More than half a dozen clinical trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin is the most effective therapy for stroke prophylaxis in AF. The narrow therapeutic index of warfarin requires that the intensity of anticoagulation be maintained within the international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 to optimize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk. The pharmacokinetics of warfarin are subject to variability due to interactions with multiple drugs and foods, making maintenance of the INR within this range difficult to achieve in clinical practice without close coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustments. Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for high-risk individuals with AF but these inherent limitations lead to substantial underprescribing, particularly in elderly patients at greatest risk. This has stimulated the development of new agents with improved benefit-risk profiles, such as ximelagatran, the first of the oral direct thrombin inhibitors, which has a wider therapeutic margin and low potential for drug interactions, allowing fixed dosing without anticoagulation monitoring. Ximelagatran has been evaluated for stroke prevention in AF in the Stroke Prevention using an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) program, the largest clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF to date. The phase III trials of ximelagatran in AF, SPORTIF III and V, found a fixed oral dose of ximelagatran (36 mg twice daily) comparable to dose-adjusted warfarin (INR 2.0 to 3.0) in preventing stroke and systemic thromboembolic complications among high-risk patients with AF. Results from the population of over 7000 patients in SPORTIF III and V demonstrate noninferiority of ximelagatran compared with warfarin. Data from SPORTIF III show an absolute reduction in stroke and systemic embolic events with ximelagatran compared with warfarin of 1.6% per year versus 2.3% per year, respectively ( P = 0.10). SPORTIF V further supports noninferiority between the two agents with an absolute risk reduction of 0.45%, well within the predefined noninferiority margin (95% confidence interval -0.13, 1.03; P = 0.13). Although event rates for major bleeding did not differ significantly with ximelagatran versus warfarin in either study, combined

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thrombin; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid antibodies have been associated with a clinical syndrome consisting thrombosis and recurrent, unexplained fetal loss.. The literature pertaining to stroke associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, with emphasis on stroke in young adults, was reviewed.. Antiphospholipid antibodies are an independent risk factor for stroke in young adults in five of six studies. Multiple antiphospholipid specificities or the Lupus Anticoagulant were tested in addition to anticardiolipin antibody in these studies. In the single study that found no increased risk for stroke, only anticardiolipin antibody was tested. Only one of these studies evaluated for risk of recurrent stroke in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and found it to be increased. No treatment trials have been conducted in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and stroke. In the single treatment trial comparing aspirin and low-INR producing doses of warfarin to prevent recurrent stroke, both were found to be equally effective.. Antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly Lupus Anticoagulant, is an independent risk factor for first and possibly recurrent ischemic stroke in young adults. The best therapeutic strategy for preventing antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent stroke is not clear.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antibodies, Anticardiolipin; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is the most common clinical arrhythmia and with an ageing population, it is an increasing cause of hospital admissions, morbidity and mortality. The most feared complication of atrial fibrillation is stroke. A number of studies have demonstrated that warfarin is at least moderately effective at reducing thromboembolic risk in stroke yet its use in both the community and in secondary care is suboptimal. Concerns about drug interactions, frequent blood monitoring and the risks of over and under coagulation have led to under prescription. Direct thrombin inhibitors are under investigation as an alternative to warfarin for thromboembolic prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Two large studies (SPORTIF III and SPORTIF V) have recently been published examining the effectiveness of the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran at reducing thromboembolic risk. Ximelagatran was shown to be non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic complications. Concerns however have arisen about long-term safety, particularly the possible effects on hepatic function. This review examines the data and discusses whether the introduction of these drugs could result in the end of the anticoagulation clinic for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation, the most commonly encountered arrhythmia in clinical practice, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Its incidence and prevalence are increasing, and it represents a growing clinical and economic burden. Recent research has highlighted new approaches to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Pooled data from trials comparing antithrombotic treatment with placebo show that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 62% and that aspirin alone reduces the risk by 22%. Overall, in high-risk patients, warfarin was better than aspirin in preventing strokes, with a relative risk reduction of 36%, but the risk of major hemorrhage with warfarin was twice that with aspirin. Anticoagulation treatment needs to be tailored individually for patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, and contraindications. However, warfarin remains under-prescribed in clinical practice, for reasons related to patients (comorbidities) and physicians. The limitations of warfarin treatment have prompted the development of new anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics that do not require as frequent monitoring. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was compared with warfarin in the SPORTIF program, which found both agents to be broadly effective in the prevention of embolic events, but observed abnormal liver function tests in 6% of patients on ximelagatran. Liver function monitoring during treatment is thus needed. Idraparinux, a factor Xa inhibitor administered by once weekly subcutaneous injections, is being evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. The ACTIVE trial is currently assessing the role of aspirin plus clopidogrel, compared with adjusted dose warfarin, in the prevention of vascular events in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor-blocking drugs interfere with atrial remodeling and show promise in atrial fibrillation, as suggested in the LIFE trial. Preliminary studies suggest that statins may reduce the risk of recurrence after electrical cardioversion. Finally, percutaneous methods for occlusion of the left atrial appendage are currently under investigation in patients at high risk of thromboembolism but with contraindications for chronic warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electric Countershock; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

About 80% of strokes have ischemic origin. Therapeutical options of acute stroke are still limited and the occurrence of recurrent strokes is remarkably high. Consequently, the adequate stroke prevention has a high importance. The two main components of prevention are the inhibition of platelet aggregation and the anticoagulant therapy. Results of multicenter drug trials showed that antiaggregation therapy can reduce the risk of recurrent stroke by ca. 25%. Acetylsalicylate has been used for stroke prevention for decades. Nowadays, there is a broad spectrum of available platelet aggregation inhibitors. The efficacy of these new drugs is higher than that of acetylsalicylate. According to recent therapeutical guidelines, the antiaggregation therapy of patients with non-cardiometabolic stroke should be optimized individually. The most frequent cause of cardiogenic stroke is atrial fibrillation. The importance of anticoagulation therapy has been proved by large multicenter studies. Absolute therapeutical indications are the elder age, additional risk factors, previous stroke. Therapeutical guidelines in other cardiological disorders associated with high risks for stroke need further drug trials. Fifty years after the introduction of warfarin, in the last years new direct thrombin inhibitors have been developed. These drugs have the same efficacy as warfarin but they are a more safety and have more simply therapeutical administration.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dipyridamole; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Recurrence; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

The presence of a carotid stenosis, a floating thrombus, and a patient with clinical and CT evidence of a stroke represents a significant therapeutic dilemma to the clinician. The evidence of a stroke precludes any active treatment of the carotid stenosis safely, while the floating thrombus demands immediate attention. We recently were involved with just such a patient and chose a conservative approach of anticoagulation followed by operative intervention several weeks later.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Carotid Artery Thrombosis; Carotid Artery, Internal; Carotid Stenosis; Cerebral Angiography; Clopidogrel; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequently encountered tachyarrhythmia requiring therapy. Treatment issues include therapy for any reversible cause; the identification and treatment of any underlying structural disorder; control of the ventricular rate, both for symptom reduction and prevention of tachycardic-induced cardiomyopathy; restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm when symptoms persist despite rhythm control; and anticoagulation in patients with high-risk markers for systemic embolization: age over 65 years, hypertension, diabetes, ventricular failure, rheumatic valvular disease, and prior stroke or other embolic event. In such patients, anticoagulation with warfarin is currently recommended. Warfarin therapy carries significant risks (especially bleeding), inconveniences (the cost of prothrombin time monitoring, the need for rigid dietary stability, the concerns of drug and herbal interactions), and other concerns (the issue of generic formulation substitution).. Under development are oral thrombin inhibitors. The first to reach clinical approval will likely be ximelagatran. In clinical trials to date, ximelagatran has proven to be equal to or superior to warfarin in the prevention and treatment of thrombophlebitis. In atrial fibrillation patients, the Stroke Prevention Using Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) trials completed so far appear to show a similar or better efficacy for ximelagatran versus warfarin as regards both prevention of embolic events and lower risks of major bleeding, with no serious adverse effects except for apparently reversible alterations in liver function tests in approximately 6% of subjects, all occurring early in therapy to date. If the remaining SPORTIF trial (SPORTIF V) is confirmatory (results to be available in late 2003), it is expected that this exciting new product will be submitted this winter to the Food and Drug Administration for approval. Recent findings also include the observations in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) and Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) trials that anticoagulation should not be discontinued despite the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm.. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors, such as ximelagatran, appear likely to replace the use of warfarin in most patients in the near future, because of a better risk-benefit profile.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Embolism; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Prothrombin Time; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Balloon Occlusion; Decision Making; Decompression Sickness; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation comprises a large and growing epidemic in the aging population. Stroke is the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation, and the risk of stroke increases markedly with age. Multiple clinical trials have proven that warfarin anticoagulation is effective in reducing this risk. However, the complex pharmacokinetics and narrow therapeutic window of warfarin make its use in clinical practice challenging. Novel approaches to anticoagulation, including more potent antiplatelet agents and direct thrombin inhibitors, are currently undergoing clinical trials. In addition, nonpharmacological approaches to stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation are also in development. These newer approaches may revolutionize the treatment of this common disorder.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombin; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Antithrombotic therapy plays a central role in secondary prevention after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. The choice among warfarin, aspirin, and other antiplatelet agents, however, depends on the cause of stroke and other individual patient characteristics. The use of warfarin anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke has demonstrated robust reductions in risk of recurrent events, comparable with those achieved in primary prevention. Warfarin may also be recommended for patients with other high-risk cardioembolic sources of stroke. The role of warfarin in noncardioembolic ischemic stroke is more controversial. The Warfarin Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study found no evidence of superiority of warfarin over aspirin in stroke patients overall, nor in any major stroke subtype, including those patients with patent foramen ovale. In post-hoc analyses, there was some evidence of benefit with warfarin in patients with cryptogenic stroke without hypertension. Risks of major bleeding did not differ significantly between warfarin and aspirin groups. For most patients with noncardioembolic strokes, therefore, antiplatelet therapy is the preferred option, although clinician experience still dictates practice in individual situations. Newer antiplatelet agents, and the combination of novel agents with aspirin, are also finding a role in stroke prevention as clinical trial data become available.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The use of warfarin with a range INR of 2.0-3.0 is recommended in prevention of stroke for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, in particular those older than 75 years. The risk of bleeding that is associated with this range of INR has led to evaluate lower ranges (low-dose or fixed minidose) in terms of risks and benefits. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials evaluating 'low-intensity' 'minidose' or 'low-dose anticoagulant' treatment for prevention of thromboembolic events in AF was conducted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was evaluated in a blinded fashion. Four original studies were retrieved. Outcome events were determined in various treatment groups: ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, thromboses (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or myocardial infarction), vascular death, major hemorrhage and hemorrhagic death. Results obtained with a random effects model were expressed as a common relative risk. Adjusted-dose warfarin compared with lower dose warfarin (INR < or = 1.6) in 2108 randomised patients significantly reduced the risk of any thrombosis: Relative risk (RR): 0.50 (95% CI; 0.25 to 0.97). The RR was 0.46 (95%CI; 0.2 to 1.07) for ischemic stroke. Inversely lower dose did not statistically decrease the risk for major hemorrhage compared to adjusted-dose: RR adjusted-dose vs lower dose: 1.23 (95% CI; 0.67-2.27). The RR was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.27-3.54) for hemorrhagic death. Our meta-analysis showed that adjusted-dose compared with low-dose or minidose warfarin therapy (INR < or =1.6) was more effective to prevent ischemic thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Statistical; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

For over two decades, valuable insights have been accumulated from epidemiologic studies and randomized trials about the risks for and prevention of AF-related stroke. AF substantially raises the risk of stroke, most likely through an atrio-embolic mechanism. Warfarin and other members of its class of oral anticoagulants targeted at an INR of 2.5 can abrogate the risk of stroke attributable to AF effectively and fairly safely. High-quality management of anticoagulation can be achieved in usual clinical care. These insights have important implications for the care of individual patients and more generally for public health. Future research is needed to specify the risk of stroke and hemorrhage among patients with AF better, particularly among older individuals, to optimize use of antithrombotic agents, and to define the role of recently developed antithrombotic drugs and invasive nondrug approaches.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke. According to a pooled analysis of controlled clinical trials with warfarin, anticoagulation therapy reduces stroke risk by 62%. However, clinicians must decide whether the benefit of long-term anticoagulation therapy with available agents outweighs the risk of bleeding for individual patients. Guidelines issued by the American College of Chest Physicians and by the joint American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology task force recommend antithrombotic therapy to protect AF patients from stroke based on risk-stratification algorithms. Risk factors for stroke AF patients include age > or =75 years; hypertension; thyrotoxicosis; diabetes; cardiovascular disease; congestive heart failure; and history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism. Patients at high risk for stroke experience greater absolute benefit from anticoagulation therapy than patients at low risk. The guidelines are consistent in recommendations for high-risk patients (warfarin therapy, international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0) and low-risk patients (aspirin 325 mg), but differ for intermediate-risk patients with diabetes or heart disease. The guidelines continue to evolve, and future guidelines are likely to incorporate new clinical data, including the CHADS(2) algorithm for determining risk and the results of the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management trial, the Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation study, and the Stroke Prevention Using an Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation II to V trials.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Europe; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Warfarin has been in routine clinical use for more than 50 years; however, it was not proven to be of benefit in both primary and secondary prevention of stroke for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) until about a decade ago. Despite its efficacy in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with AF by about 60%, with an absolute reduction of about 3% per year, there have always been barriers to its use. These barriers have included the need for monitoring the degree of anticoagulation with blood tests to measure the international normalised ratio, frequent dose adjustments to maintain this ratio within quite a narrow therapeutic range, and the risk of bleeding should the upper limits of this range be exceeded. Aspirin has also been used but is less effective.. New oral drugs are being tested; these may be as effective at reducing stroke risk as warfarin in patients with AF. Direct thrombin inhibitors such as ximelagatran are not inferior to warfarin and, based on results from the SPORTIF III and V trials, are perhaps safer, with no need for long-term monitoring and dose adjustment. However, the side-effect of raised amounts of the liver enzyme alanine amino-transferase in 6% of patients needs to be resolved. In the ACTIVE trial, the efficacy of a combination of antiplatelet drugs (aspirin plus clopidogrel) is being tested against dose-adjusted warfarin; and in AMADEUS, the factor-Xa inhibitor and pentasaccharide idraparinux is being assessed in a similar way. Several surgical procedures and devices are also being developed to control AF rhythm and prevent stroke. WHERE NEXT?: The place of these new drugs in the management of AF needs to be established. In the short term, it seems that ximelagatran will replace warfarin in patients for whom there is evidence of a favourable risk-to-benefit ratio. The SPORTIF population consists of patients with AF plus at least one risk factor. More information about the effect of raised liver enzymes will probably not be available until phase IV studies are completed. Combination antiplatelet drugs need to be tested further--perhaps even triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole--if the results of ACTIVE are encouraging. The place of surgical procedures and devices to control rhythm and prevent stroke is unclear. Whatever happens, there is a high probability that the days of warfarin are numbered.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There is increasing interest in the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and documented stroke of unknown cause, commonly referred to as cryptogenic stroke. We reviewed the literature and, on the basis of the available data, designed a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke. Patent foramen ovale is relatively common in the general population, but its prevalence is higher in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Importantly, paradoxical embolism through a PFO should be strongly considered in young patients with cryptogenic stroke. There is no consensus on the optimal management strategy, but treatment options include antiplatelet agents, warfarin sodium, percutaneous device closure, and surgical closure. High-risk features in the patient's history (ie, temporal association between Valsalva-inducing maneuvers and stroke, coexisting hypercoagulable state, recurrent strokes, and PFO with large opening, large right-to-left shunt, or right-to-left shunting at rest, and a coexisting atrial septal aneurysm) should prompt PFO closure.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Catheterization; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Embolism, Paradoxical; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial; Humans; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Recurrence; Stroke; Valsalva Maneuver; Warfarin

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is rapidly absorbed, is efficiently bioconverted to the active form, melagatran (AstraZeneca) and has shown efficacy and relative safety as an anticoagulant for prophylaxis and therapy of thromboembolism. Two Phase III trials, Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF V), have tested the hypothesis that oral ximelagatran, administered 36 mg twice daily without coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment, prevents stroke and systemic embolism at least as effectively as adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Both were randomized, multicenter trials (n > 3000 per trial) with blinded end-point assessment. The open-label SPORTIF III trial confirmed the noninferiority of ximelagatran versus warfarin. Publication of the full results from SPORTIF V is pending.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

We reviewed the efficacy and safety of combination antithrombotic therapy with aspirin plus warfarin versus aspirin alone in patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. We performed a comprehensive MEDLINE search of English-language reports published between 1966 and 2002 and search of references and relevant papers. Only clinical research studies on primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease or patients experiencing unstable angina or myocardial infarction were included. Despite daily aspirin treatment, many patients break through aspirin treatment and experience cardiovascular events. Individuals at high risk for coronary disease or with established disease benefit from combination therapy with aspirin plus warfarin, if compliance with warfarin is greater than 70% and the target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-2.5 is achieved. Combination therapy within these parameters leads to a 29-45% reduction in the risk of death, reinfarction and/or ischemic stroke. There is a significant increase in the rate of minor and a slight increase in the rate of major bleeding with combination therapy. Other potential indications for combination therapy include myocardial infarction associated with acute left ventricular aneurysm or significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In spite of reluctance to use oral anticoagulants, several large, randomized clinical trials support combination therapy with aspirin plus warfarin (INR, 2.0-2.5) in high-risk patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. Combination therapy increases the risk of minor and major bleeding, but not intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Prevention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is now regarded as the arrhythmia for which patients are hospitalized the most frequently, an arrhythmia that is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Of particular importance is that the arrhythmia is associated with a significant incidence of thromboembolism which may induce disabling and incapacitating strokes, sometimes fatal. In the past, it was thought that in patients with AF restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm prevent the development of strokes, a presumption that has not been vindicated by controlled clinical trials. On the other hand, over many decades, it has been established that appropriate anticoagulation especially with warfarin can reduce stroke rate in nonvalvular AF by about 70%, and mortality by 26%. Aspirin reduces stroke rate by 26%, mortality by about 10%. Thus, in AF oral anticoagulants have become the focal point of therapy for the prevention of strokes and the safety and efficacy of such a therapy has been established by controlled clinical trials; moreover, the subsets of patients with AF in whom anticoagulation is mandatory have been defined on the basis of defined risk factors. Warfarin is now the anticoagulant of choice although its limitations are considerable in terms of drug-drug interactions, narrow range of therapeutic index requiring strict monitoring of intensity of anticoagulation, among other limitations which influence compliance of therapy with the agent. In this review, the continuing role of warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF is discussed as a background for the development of newer anticoagulants. The issue is of particular importance in the older patients, in whom the development of safer antithrombotic therapies remain a major challenge. In this context, the potential role of the direct thrombin inhibitors hold promise for the future and the evolving data on leading compounds of this class which may be competitive with warfarin are discussed.

Topics: Aged; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Drug Design; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Self Care; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In a review of relevant articles from the Medline database on stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) and adverse events related to anticoagulation treatment, we found that research to date shows a major potential benefit of warfarin therapy (International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2.0-3.0) for patients with AF (68% risk reduction in primary stroke prevention with warfarin vs. placebo). Despite this highly significant reduction in stroke risk, fewer than 50% of eligible patients are treated, in many cases because of fears of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The decision to implement anticoagulant therapy to improve outcome requires balancing the decreased risk for stroke against the increased risk for ICH. Various methods have been developed to define patient-specific stroke risk. In contrast, risk for ICH strongly correlates with the intensity of anticoagulation, which is an unpredictable but controllable variable requiring frequent dose adjustments. Recent studies have also identified subgroups of patients with neurologic pathologies who are at increased risk for ICH. However, when the INR is properly controlled, the benefit from anticoagulation therapy for patients with AF and other risk factors for stroke exceeds the risk for ICH. Careful monitoring of anticoagulation and warfarin dose titration to maintain the INR between 2.0 and 3.0 is critical for reducing the risk for ICH, as is excluding patients with neurologic conditions that increase the likelihood of ICH. Future developments, such as the introduction of oral direct thrombin inhibitors with more predictable pharmacokinetics than warfarin, may further improve the benefit-to-risk ratio of anticoagulation therapy for patients with AF.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Decision Making; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Ischemic stroke, a major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF), is believed to result from atrial thrombus formation caused by ineffective atrial contraction. Oral anticoagulant therapy effectively reduces the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF; this therapy is recommended for patients with any frequency or duration of AF and other risk factors for stroke, such as increased age (>75 years), hypertension, prior stroke, left ventricular dysfunction, diabetes, or heart failure. Recently published data comparing rate-control and rhythm-control strategies in AF emphasized the importance of maintaining an international normalized ratio higher than 2.0 during warfarin therapy and the need for continuing anticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke in high-risk patients, even if the strategy is rhythm control. Hemorrhagic complications can be minimized by stringent control of the international normalized ratio (particularly in elderly patients) and appropriate therapy for comorbidities such as hypertension, gastric ulcer, and early-stage cancers. Undertreatment of patients with AF is a continuing problem, particularly in the elderly population. Patients perceived as likely to be noncompliant, such as the functionally impaired, are less likely to receive warfarin therapy. However, stroke prevention with anticoagulants is cost-effective and improves quality of life, despite the challenges of maintaining appropriate anticoagulation with monitoring and warfarin dose titration. New medications in development with more predictable dosing and fewer drug-drug interactions may reduce the complexities of achieving optimal anticoagulation and increase the practicality of long-term anticoagulant therapy for patients with AF at risk of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In part IV of a series of papers on epidemiology and drug prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation the authors present data on clinical pharmacology of low molecular weight heparins, ximelagatran, indobufen, triflusal, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, and clopidogrel. Efficacy of direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran was found in randomized trials to be similar to efficacy of warfarin however the use of ximelagatran required no laboratory control of coagulation parameters. Preventive efficacy of indobufen, triflusal, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, and clopidogrel was assessed in trials on patients with cardiovascular diseases substantial number of whom had atrial fibrillation. Data of retrospective analysis of these trials are scrutinized in this review.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Decision Making; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To systematically review evidence from clinical trials about the management of neurological manifestations of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).. Articles reporting case-control, cohort and prospective studies and treatment trials of primary or secondary stroke prevention in patients with aPL were identified in an OVID literature search from 1966 to 2004, using the keywords: APS, aPL and cerebrovascular disease. Articles were evaluated according to the standard system for assessing medical evidence to answer the following questions: (1) What is the role of aPL and recurrent stroke risk in both primary and secondary APS populations? (2) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for secondary prevention of aPL-associated stroke? (3) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for primary prevention of aPL-associated stroke?. (1) aPL are a risk factor for incident stroke (Grade A, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (2) The evidence to support the role of aPL in recurrent stroke is conflicting and, therefore, inconclusive. (3) Warfarin at moderate-intensity doses is equally effective in preventing a recurrent thrombotic event as warfarin at high-intensity doses in patients with APS (Grade A evidence, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (4) Warfarin, at moderate-intensity doses is as effective as aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg/day) in preventing recurrent thrombotic events in patients who are aPL-positive at the time of an initial stroke (Grade B evidence, probably useful for the given condition in the given population). (5) Currently there are no data to support the use of any prophylactic therapy in patients with aPL and no clinical manifestations for the purposes of preventing an incident stroke.

Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Case-Control Studies; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Humans; Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are growing epidemics in the developed world and often coexist. From clinical trials, warfarin is highly effective in reducing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Equally important is the fact that in spite of well-designed trials, translation of the results of the data from the trials into clinical practice has been less than optimal. One of the reasons is that warfarin is a difficult drug to use. Thus there has been a concerted effort to develop an alternative to warfarin. Ximelagatran and Dabigatran, both direct thrombin inhibitors, are the furthest along in clinical development. Ximelagatran, while highly effective as an anticoagulant and safe with regard to bleeding, has been associated with liver function abnormalities; the importance of which needs resolution. Dabigatran is much earlier in development and is currently of unproven value. It is highly likely that alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention will be available in the future and will likely result in a higher utilization rate of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Stroke; Thrombin; Warfarin

Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF) is one among the major public health problems, because it is associated with a high incidence of stroke or systemic thromboembolism. Warfarin significantly reduces cerebral/systemic events mainly in high-risk patients; unfortunately such drug is often as well under-used in eligible patients as under-dosed in treated patients. Traditional therapy with oral anticoagulants has several disadvatages: narrow therapeutic window, and often unpredictable dose-response so that frequent monitoring of the INR is required. It is therefore crucial that patients preferences and education be integrated into the decision-making process. Physicians often underprescribe oral anticoagulants since they perceive the risk of major bleeding as unacceptable because of some well known risk factors (e.g. previous bleedings, severe hypertension), and of qualms about drug interactions or alleged poor compliance. Therefore, the development of easy-to-use antithrombotic agents is still a challenge. New agents such as oral direct thrombin inhibitors are going to hold the promise for the next future. Ximelagatran is an orally active small molecule; being the first new oral anticoagulant used in large clinical trials. This molecule has many advantages in comparison to warfarin, such as the rapid onset/offset of action, the fixed oral dose, the no need of dose adjustment or of anticoagulation monitoring, as well the lack of food/alcohol intake interference as of drug interactions. The SPORTIF III and V trials have shown that ximelagatran is not inferior to warfarin in the prevention of strokes in patients with NRAF (both persistent and paroxysmal), but a side effect--consisting in the significant elevation of liver enzymes (> 3 times the upper limit of normal) in 6% of patients--was found. Further randomized trials are clearly needed, while current data suggest that ximelagatran will be able to represent a future viable therapeutic option for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with NRAF, offering huge advantages with respect to classic oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Satisfaction; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To examine the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) and outcomes (major bleeding events and strokes) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving anticoagulation with warfarin.. A systematic review and metaanalysis of studies published in the English language between January 1, 1985, and October 30, 2002, was performed. MEDLINE (PubMed), Current Contents, and relevant reference lists were searched. Studies enrolling patients with nonvalvular AF receiving warfarin anticoagulation were eligible for inclusion if they reported stroke and/or major bleeding events in relation to INR, or time spent in therapeutic range. The risk of bleeds in overanticoagulated patients (INR > 3) and the risk of strokes in underanticoagulated patients (INR < 2) were assessed.. Twenty-one studies (6,248 patients) met all inclusion criteria. Of the 21 studies, a target conventional INR of 2 to 3 was used in 9 studies. An INR < 2, compared with an INR > or = 2, was associated with an odds ratio (OR) for ischemic events of 5.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.92 to 8.80). An INR > 3, compared with an INR < or = 3, was associated with an OR for bleeding events of 3.21 (95% CI, 1.24 to 8.28). On average, in the four studies with a target INR range of 2 to 3, patients with AF receiving warfarin spent 61% of time within, 13% of time above, and 26% below the therapeutic range.. Available evidence indicates that in patients with nonvalvular AF, the risk of ischemic stroke with insufficient warfarin anticoagulation (INR < 2), and the risk of bleeding events with overanticoagulation (INR > 3) are significantly higher relative to patients with AF maintained within the recommended INR of 2 to 3. However, the published data are sparse, heterogeneous, and primarily reported from clinical trials. More studies evaluating clinical outcomes in relation to INR are needed, especially in a real-world setting.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemoprevention; Drug Monitoring; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Managed Care Programs; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) greatly increases the risk of stroke. Long-term oral therapy with warfarin reduces the risk of AF-related stroke by 62%, and national guidelines now call for warfarin therapy in most patients without specific contraindications to anticoagulation. However, the drug's narrow therapeutic index means that warfarin therapy must be guided by coagulation monitoring. This requirement and other inherent limitations of warfarin have led to widespread underutilization and underanticoagulation in AF patients who require antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention. Recent studies indicate that in many health systems less than half of warfarin-eligible patients take the drug and even fewer are adequately maintained within a protective therapeutic range. Similarly, despite the documented efficacy of anticoagulation in patients at risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and related pulmonary embolism, prophylaxis for DVT, even in high-risk situations such as following orthopedic surgery, is suboptimal. This article explores the scope of warfarin underutilization and underanticoagulation that exists in current clinical practice. The clinical consequences of warfarin underuse are also described. Discussion in the roundtable after this review explores the causes for the wide treatment gap between anticoagulation clinical trial results and clinical practice outcomes. The economic implications of such a gap and strategies for closing the gap are also discussed by the panelists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemoprevention; Drug Monitoring; Drug Utilization; Evidence-Based Medicine; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The topic of anticoagulant prescription in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, provides a forum for discussion of current challenges in anticoagulation management and ways in which the introduction of ximelagatran will provide an opportunity to overcome many of them. Anticoagulation with warfarin has been shown to reduce stroke rates by 68%, providing significant net monetary savings. However, physician fear of hemorrhagic side effects, the need for regular INR monitoring, food and drug interactions, and patient noncompliance have all played a part in either suboptimal utilization or complete avoidance of anticoagulant therapy, even in patients at high risk for stroke. Ximelagatran, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, circumvents most of these problems and provides a more physician- and patient-friendly method of stroke prophylaxis. With the utilization of this new anticoagulation method, the incidence of stroke in high risk groups, and the corresponding quality-of-life and economic impact, can potentially be greatly reduced.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Warfarin therapy achieving an International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 has been shown to be effective in preventing stroke. However, warfarin administration is problematic because of its variable dose, interaction with numerous foods and drugs, narrow therapeutic range, need for chronic anticoagulation monitoring, and long onset and offset of action, which all contribute to the significant underuse of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke despite clear indication for its use. This has led to new approaches. Studies with idraparinux (AMADEUS), a factor 10a inhibitor, and with aspirin and clopidogrel (ACTIVE), both platelet inhibitors, are on-going. Studies with ximelagatran (Stroke Prevention by Oral Thrombin Inhibition in Atrial Fibrillation [SPORTIF] trials III and V), an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, have been completed. They compared ximelagatran with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. The studies demonstrated that ximelagatran is not inferior to warfarin. Moreover, ximelagatran has rapid onset and offset of action, fixed oral dosing without the need for anticoagulation monitoring, low potential for food and drug interactions, and a therapeutic margin wider than that of warfarin. We anticipate further studies to demonstrate definitively that the small percentage of patients (0.5%) with elevation of both alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin levels can be managed safely, thereby making ximelagatran a promising option for preventing thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antipyrine; Arginine; Aspirin; Brain Edema; Edaravone; Fibrinolytic Agents; Free Radical Scavengers; Glycerol; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Japan; Methacrylates; Pipecolic Acids; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Warfarin

This article will review 2 clinical trials that recently compared the safety and efficacy of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran (fixed dose, 36 mg twice daily) with warfarin (adjusted dose, target international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0-3.0) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor for stroke. These noninferiority trials involved 7329 patients and a mean exposure to study drug of 18.5 months. The Stroke Prevention Using Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III (open-label, N = 3407) and V trials (double-blind, N = 3922) were designed for pooled analysis, and the data showed the efficacy of ximelagatran therapy was comparable (noninferior) with extremely well-controlled warfarin therapy in preventing stroke and systemic embolic events; the primary event rates were 1.65% per year and 1.62% per year in the warfarin and ximelagatran groups, respectively (P = .941). In patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (about 20% of the SPORTIF population), the event rates were 3.27% per year and 2.83% per year in the warfarin and ximelagatran groups, respectively (P = .625). The distribution of stroke subtypes was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred at a rate of 0.20% per year with warfarin and 0.11% per year with ximelagatran. Combined rates of minor and major bleeding were significantly lower with ximelagatran than with warfarin (32% per year vs 39% per year; P < .0001). The myocardial infarction rates were the same in the pooled database (no difference between agents). The aspirin data will be the subject of two substudy papers. Oral ximelagatran administered without coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment was as effective as well-controlled, adjusted-dose warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events and was associated with significantly less total bleeding. This oral direct thrombin inhibitor is a potentially promising treatment option for the prevention of thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of ischemic stroke due to the formation of a thrombus within left atrium. Thus, adjusted-dose (optimal INR: 2-3) anticoagulant therapy such as warfarin dramaticaly decreases this risk of embolic events both in primary and secondary prevention but slightly increases the risk of bleeding, particularly in the elderly. This explains that, although the benefit has been clearly demonstrated, the anticoagulant therapy remains underused. The efficacy of low doses of aspirin is less clear but it may be appropriate in younger patients with lone AF because of a low risk of embolic events. The combination of low doses of warfarin and aspirin should not be given. In case of contraindication to warfarin and aspirin, some others drugs such as indobufen or dipyridamole may be given but the most promising drug is ximelagatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, which appears to be as effective than warfarin with a lower incidence of bleedings. For patients in AF who require urgent cardioversion, intravenous unfractionated heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice but an approach combining low-molecular-weight heparin and transesophageal echocardiography has been proposed. For each patient the decision of treatment must be tightly correlated to the benefit-risk ratio.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Confidence Intervals; Emergency Medicine; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Middle Aged; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants have been used in patients with vascular disease for over 40 years, yet their role in the secondary prevention of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events remains controversial. The objectives of this systematic review are to more reliably determine the role of oral anticoagulants with and without antiplatelet therapy in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). Randomized trials in which oral anticoagulants were tested in CAD patients who were treated for at least three months were identified, and each trial was classified by the targeted level of intensity of anticoagulation. Data from the trials were combined using the modified Mantel-Haenszel method, and odds ratios were computed. Data from over 20,000 patients indicated that high-intensity oral anticoagulation (international normalized ratio [INR] >2.8) significantly reduced CV complications and increased bleeding compared with controls. Moderate-intensity oral anticoagulation (INR 2 to 3) also reduced CV complications compared with controls. The combination of moderate-intensity oral anticoagulation and aspirin is more effective and equally as safe as aspirin alone. Low-intensity oral anticoagulation (INR <2) in the presence of aspirin does not reduce CV complications and increases bleeding compared with aspirin alone.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, and it increases the risk of stroke. Placebo-controlled trials consistently showed that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by two thirds, and a meta-analysis of trials of aspirin show a one-fifth reduction. Meta-analysis of trials directly comparing warfarin and aspirin shows that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke compared with aspirin by about one third. Major advisory bodies recommend risk stratification of patients with AF and prophylactic therapy with warfarin for patients at higher risk. There are several problems with warfarin therapy, which have resulted in a widely documented underuse. These problems include a narrow therapeutic window, marked variability in pharmacokinetics, and contraindications. There are new promising approaches to stroke prevention in AF. One of these is combination antiplatelet therapy. In a large randomized trial, the combination of dipyridamole and aspirin has been shown to have additive benefits against stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin results in additive benefits against vascular events, with only a modest increase in bleeding. A trial of combined antiplatelet therapy in AF is warranted. Occlusion of the left atrial appendage, either with a transvenous device or with surgery, is another strategy that is being explored. A direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, has been shown to have an excellent pharmacokinetic profile and is being developed as an oral agent for stroke prevention in AF, and it will not need regular monitoring.

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Dipyridamole; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation predisposes to left atrial thrombus formation and carries a sixfold increased risk for stroke. Antithrombotic therapies are the mainstay for stroke prevention. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-sponsored Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) studies assessed the value of warfarin, aspirin, and their combination for preventing stroke in six multicenter trials involving 3950 participants. This review presents the major results and implications, which offer unique perspectives on antithrombotic therapies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Warfarin and aspirin reduce stroke. Anticoagulation substantially benefits high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation, while many younger patients with atrial fibrillation have a low stroke rate when given aspirin. Pathogenetic and transesophageal echocardiographic correlations shed light on mechanisms by which antithrombotic agents prevent stroke. Warfarin inhibits formation of atrial appendage thrombi and markedly reduces cardioembolic strokes, while aspirin primarily prevents smaller, noncardioembolic strokes. The SPAF III stroke risk stratification scheme has been validated for identifying patients with high versus moderate versus low risk for stroke. Women with atrial fibrillation benefit from anticoagulation significantly more than men do. Many elderly patients with recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have high rates of stroke. Antithrombotic prophylaxis should be individualized on the basis of the estimated risk for stroke during aspirin therapy and the risk for bleeding during anticoagulation. Overall, nearly one third of patients with atrial fibrillation are low risk and should be treated with aspirin, and about one third are high risk and should receive warfarin if it can be given safely. For patients at moderate risk for stroke, patient preferences and access to reliable anticoagulation monitoring are particularly relevant.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for stroke prevention. Multiple antiplatelet agents are now proven options for patients at risk for stroke, whereas warfarin anticoagulation remains the preferred therapy for most patients with atrial fibrillation. Recent clinical trials have clarified the role of anticoagulation in acute stroke and in secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator is the only approved therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial thrombolysis is emerging as a promising therapy in selected patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Complications; Drug Interactions; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Contraindications; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Urologic Diseases; Vena Cava Filters; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that is associated with an increased risk for vascular events, particularly stroke. Two different therapies have been extensively evaluated for prevention of vascular events in AF: oral anticoagulation (such as warfarin), and aspirin. Placebo-controlled trials of warfarin have been performed and summarized in a meta-analysis. There is clear evidence of a benefit, with a relative risk reduction in stroke of 67% and in total vascular events of 42%. Aspirin also has been studied and is effective, but with a more modest benefit (relative risk reduction of 22%). Several studies have compared warfarin and aspirin, and showed a clear benefit in favor of warfarin for reduction of vascular events and stroke. Compared to aspirin, the risk of major hemorrhage with oral anticoagulation is increased by 70% to 100%. Current practice guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation therapy for high-risk patients with AF, unless there is an increased risk for bleeding. Nonetheless, oral anticoagulation therapy with drugs such as warfarin is difficult for both patients and physicians because of the increased risk for bleeding and the need for ongoing monitoring of coagulation status. Many patients do not receive anticoagulation therapy despite its proven benefits.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Contraindications; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Placebo Effect; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases; Warfarin

THE CONTEXT: The demonstration of the efficacy of oral anticoagulants in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke represents a major progress in medicine in the last twenty years. Efficacy in fact depends on the causes and this determines the indications. ADMITTED AND DEMONSTRATED INDICATIONS: Cardiac arrhythmia due to atrial fibrillation and the existence of mechanical prosthetic valves are the only two indications that have been demonstrated with sufficient proof. ADMITTED NON-DEMONSTRATED INDICATIONS: These are basically the dissection of cervical arteries, aortal cross atheroma, vascular cerebral accidents within the context of antiphospholipid antibody syndromes. POSSIBLE INDICATIONS: There are three: stenosis of the intra-cranial arteries, patent foramen ovale with atrial septum aneurysm and the basilar dolichoectasia trunks. NON-DEMONSTRATED SUPERIORITY: In atherosclerosis-induced cerebral ischemic accidents.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Arteriosclerosis; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Intracranial Arterial Diseases; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Prevention; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

Five types of drug therapy can be considered after stroke: antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation with heparin or warfarin, blood-pressure-lowering therapy with ACE-inhibitors and diuretics, and finally cholesterol-lowering with statins. Aspirin therapy is the best-documented treatment to avoid another stroke, both in the acute and the long-term perspective. Warfarin treatment is fairly well documented for stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. Heparin therapy increases the risk for serious haemorrhage. Blood-pressure-lowering with a combined ACE-inhibitor and diuretic regimen has been shown to reduce the recurrence rate in younger patients with hemorrhagic as well as ischemic stroke. Statin therapy could be offered to younger stroke patients with a history of coronary heart disease. The increased occurrence of malignant diseases during statin therapy in elderly patients in one study deserves further investigations.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Diuretics; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heparin; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Management of Atrial Fibrillation. There are three fundamental approaches to the management of atrial fibrillation (AF): rate control, rhythm control, and anticoagulation. Selecting a course of treatment requires a thorough knowledge of these therapeutic alternatives. This article explores treatment options, including the relative benefits of rate control versus rhythm control, which are complicated by the lack of highly effective and safe antiarrhythmic drugs. Anticoagulation is also an important issue in AF management, and warfarin effectively reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in AF patients. The use of warfarin, however, presents its own complications. We conclude that individualization of therapy is paramount when treating AF.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Pacemaker, Artificial; Patient Care Management; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

The Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) and Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study (RACE) Trials evaluated strategies of rate control or rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. AFFIRM enrolled patients with recent onset AF, and at entry over half of all patients were in sinus rhythm. At any point in the trial, the achieved difference in cardiac rhythm was likely only about 30%. In RACE all patients were entered in AF, and at the end of the study, sinus rhythm was present in 10% vs 39%. The strategy of rate control was non-inferior to the rhythm control strategy in both trials, and permits consideration of rate control as primary therapy. However, the actual differences in rhythm were relatively small, and do not allow the conclusion that maintenance of sinus rhythm is inferior to non-maintenance. Current guidelines recommend that patients with paroxysmal AF receive warfarin if they have risk factors for stroke. This is supported by data from AFFIRM. Most strokes in AFFIRM occurred either during subtherapeutic INR, or after cessation of warfarin. Since more patients in the rhythm control arm of AFFIRM discontinued warfarin, it is possible that asymptomatic recurrences of paroxysmal AF fostered clot development and embolization. We cannot answer from the data available whether or not it is safe to discontinue anticoagulation if all episodes of AF are suppressed. Among the reasons that AF is associated with increased mortality may be that it encourages development of congestive heart failure or progressive left ventricular dysfunction. Congestive heart failure occurrence was monitored in both trials, and occurred at a rate of 2-5% without significant differences between rate and rhythm arms. In patients with heart failure at entry, a mortality trend in AFFIRM favored the rhythm control arm. The issue of survivorship and rhythm control in AF in congestive heart failure is undergoing further testing.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

Based on the established fact that anticoagulation with warfarin is superior to antiplatelet agents in the prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF), we propose that, in contrast to atherothrombotic disorders, the risk of developing a stroke or thromboembolic event in AF is more likely to be affected by the coagulation pathway than by platelet activity. Indeed, platelet-rich thrombi may be the predominant underlying pathophysiological process in coronary artery disease patients, thus representing an entirely different prothrombotic profile to the patients with AF, where clotting factor abnormalities (and thus fibrin-rich thrombi) are more likely. Thus, we would hypothesise that warfarin is probably more likely to be more beneficial than aspirin-clopidogrel combination therapy when used in this setting. Indeed, this hypothesis would need to be tested in large randomised clinical trials.

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

In the absence of contraindications, patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one major risk factor for stroke should receive long-term oral anticoagulant treatment to prevent atrial thrombus formation. Because age of more than 75 years is a major risk factor for stroke, but is also a risk factor for major bleeding, the decision to treat elderly patients with anticoagulants should be made on an individual basis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation occurs commonly in the setting of congestive heart failure and, in fact can cause left ventricular dysfunction due to a rapid ventricular response over time, termed tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. The combination of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure leads to a high risk of stroke for the patient and appropriate antithrombotic therapy can minimize this incidence of stroke. Stroke risk can be markedly reduced by treatment with warfarin and complications of anticoagulation minimized by close attention to maintaining the INR between 2.0 and 3.0.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with Hughes (antiphospholipid) syndrome who develop an initial thrombosis have an increased risk of subsequent thrombotic events. Current therapy to prevent recurrent thrombosis is controversial. While it seems clear that anticoagulant treatment is a better option than anti-aggregants alone, there is no consensus regarding the duration and intensity of oral anticoagulation. The risk of bleeding, the main complication of anticoagulant treatment, and the need for frequent monitoring of the International Normalized Ratio to measure the anticoagulant effect of warfarin concern patients and physicians. In addition, there is some debate about the validity of the International Normalized Ratio in patients with lupus anticoagulant activity. The development of new therapies that target more specific pathogenic mechanisms is highly warranted.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Monitoring; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Recurrence; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Full assessment of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients is required to identify all risk factors and apply appropriate secondary preventative strategies. Antiplatelet therapies are effective in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and can be justified despite adverse effects such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), aspirin plus dipyridamole, ticlopidine and clopidogrel are all of value but their adverse effect profiles vary significantly. Combinations of antiplatelet agents may offer additional benefit but not all combinations have been studied in stroke patients. Anticoagulation with agents such as warfarin is effective with coexisting atrial fibrillation and other conditions predisposing to cardioembolic stroke. Antihypertensive agents have been extensively studied in the primary prevention of stroke; however, relatively few trials of antihypertensive agents in the secondary prevention of stroke are available. The incidence of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents is relatively low and the benefit-risk profile would tend to favour their use in the secondary prevention of stroke. Recent studies of ACE inhibitors have identified an important role for these agents in the secondary prevention of stroke even in those who are normotensive and in those who have had a haemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of serious adverse effects with ACE inhibitors appears relatively low. Lipid-lowering agents may have a role to play in certain groups of patients with stroke. The incidence of adverse effects is relatively low with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for stroke and evidence is available that smoking cessation does reduce the individual's risk of stroke. Pharmacological agents are available to help smoking cessation. In patients with diabetes mellitus, intensive regimens with insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents have so far not definitively been shown to reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications such as stroke. Tight glycaemic control has been shown to improve microvascular complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy and hence this is reason enough to advocate the use of these agents. Future developments in the treatment of diabetes may help. Secondary prevention of stroke has improved greatly over the past decade and hopefully will continue to improve. The use of pharmacological agents a

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coumarins; Dipyridamole; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Smoking Cessation; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Epidemiologic Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Software Design; Stroke; United Kingdom; Warfarin

Anticoagulation regimens vary according to surgeon, nature of the valve (mechanical or biological), its position and other risk factors for stroke. The American College of Chest Physicians (2001) have made the following recommendations to protect patients with prosthetic heart valves from developing a stroke: (i) For mechanical heart valves: Anticoagulation with Warfarin at an INR range 2-3 for patients with a bileaflet mechanical valve in the aortic position; (ii) in the mitral position, an INR of 2.5-3.5 is recommended; an alternative recommendation is an INR of 2-3 in combination with aspirin (80 mg/day); and (iii) in patients with a mechanical valve and a history of systemic embolization, an INR of 2.5-3.5 combined with low-dose aspirin (80-100 mg) is recommended; when Warfarin therapy is initiated, the doses for patients aged <70 years is 4 mg, and for patients aged >70 years it is 3 mg. While it is important to recognize that the therapeutic range for Warfarin is narrow, recommendations have also been established to manage patients with high INRs and for the temporary discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy when they undergo surgical procedures. Rapid anticoagulation can be achieved either with unfractionated heparin or with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Heparin is initiated with an intravenous bolus of 80 U/kg bodyweight, and an infusion of 18 U/kg/h. The activated thromboplastin time should be 60-80 s. An alternative to intravenous heparin is subcutaneous LMWH, which is prescribed in a mg/kg dose. In the event of valve thrombosis in patients who are hemodynamically unstable, surgical exploration with thrombectomy is indicated, with or without valve replacement. In patients who are hemodynamically stable, thrombolytic therapy is recommended initially.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Older individuals (subjects aged >65 years) largely contribute to the percentage deaths due to myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is also higher >65 years old patients. However, the risk of bleeding complications in patients on antithrombotic drugs increases with age and with clinical conditions, as cognitive/psychiatric diseases, traumas, hypertension, poor compliance with medications, common in the elderly. Thus the risk-benefit ratio of antithrombotics should be carefully evaluated in older individuals. To prevent the risk and the recurrence of ischemic stroke and MI in the older patients with stable/ unstable angina, MI, TIA/stroke or peripheral arterial disease, antiplatelet drugs are of choice. Aspirin is the most widely used antiplatelet drug. Clopidogrel is safer and more effective than aspirin in this respect. The combination of heparin and aspirin is the treatment of choice for unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, also in the elderly. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) proved to be as effective as standard heparin in this indication. In the absence of contraindications, thrombolysis for treatment of acute MI may be considered in the elderly. For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), intravenous standard heparin, subcutaneous standard heparin or LMWHs are effective. Because of the limited risk/benefit ratio, thrombolytic agents are not recommended for treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the elderly. They should be limited to young patients and to patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE). For chronic treatment of VTE, warfarin is the treatment of choice (INR 2.0-3.0), also in the elderly. Because of hypersensitivity to oral anticoagulants, lower dosages of warfarin are needed in the old patient. As to prophylaxis of VTE in surgery, in subjects at low-moderate risk, or in medical patients, low-dose heparin or low-dose LMWHs are effective. As to prophylaxis of VTE in surgery in subjects at high risk, adjusted-dose heparin or high-dose LMWHs are recommended. Finally, as to prevention of stroke in patients older than 75 with atrial fibrillation (AF), warfarin is of choice.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pulmonary Embolism; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The role of anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke has long been an area of debate. Previous evidence has shown that anticoagulation is unsafe at an International Normalized Ratio between 3.0 and 4.5. Results of the recently published Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS) suggest that there is no difference between warfarin and aspirin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke or death or in the rate of major hemorrhage. Differences in the therapeutic interventions used may have had an effect on the differences in endpoints achieved as compared with previous studies. Results of ongoing trials are anticipated to further clarify the role of anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In North America, atrial fibrillation is associated with at least 75 000 ischemic strokes each year. Most of these strokes occur in patients older than 75 years of age. The high incidence of stroke in very elderly persons reflects the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation that occurs with advanced age, the high incidence of stroke in elderly patients, and the failure of physicians to prescribe antithrombotic therapy in most of these patients. This failure is related to the increased risk for major hemorrhage with advanced age, obfuscating the decision to institute stroke prophylaxis with antithrombotic therapy. This case-based review describes the risk and benefits of prescribing antithrombotic therapy for a hypothetical 80-year-old man who has atrial fibrillation and hypertension, and it offers practical advice on managing warfarin therapy. After concluding that the benefits of warfarin outweigh its risks in this patient, we describe how to initiate warfarin therapy cautiously and how to monitor and dose the drug. We then review five recent randomized, controlled trials that document the increased risk for stroke when an international normalized ratio (INR) of less than 2.0 is targeted among patients with atrial fibrillation. Next, we make the case that cardioversion is not needed for this asymptomatic patient with chronic atrial fibrillation. Instead, we choose to leave the patient in atrial fibrillation and to control his ventricular rate with atenolol. Later, when the INR increases to 4.9, we advocate withholding one dose of warfarin and repeating the INR test. Finally, when the patient develops dental pain, we review the analgesic agents that are safe to take with warfarin and explain why warfarin therapy does not have to be interrupted during a subsequent dental extraction.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Atrial Fibrillation; Dental Care; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Hypertension; International Normalized Ratio; Risk Factors; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Warfarin

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia and stroke is its most devasting complication. The rate of ischemic stroke among people with AF is approximately six times that of people without AF and varies importantely with coexistent cardiovascular diseases; therefore stratification of AF patients into those at high and low risk of thromboembolism has become a crucial determinant of optimal antithrombotic prophylaxis. Multivaria-te analyses of prospective studies consistently show prior TIA/stroke, diabetes, age, heart failure to be independently predictive of stroke; left ventricular dysfunction is also strongly associated with stroke risk. Several randomized clinical trials demonstrated that treatment with adjusted-dose warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in AF patients by about two thirds. The efficacy of aspirin for prevention of stroke is controversial, but supported by pooled results of 3 placebo-controlled trials yelding a 21% reduction in stroke. The inherent risk of stroke should be considered in selection of AF patients for lifelong anticoagulation. Patients with AF and a recent stroke or TIA or multiple risk factors for stroke are likely to benefit from anticoagulation therapy; at present a target INR 2,5 appears optimal for most patients, although INR closer to 2.0 may be safer for patients at increased risk for bleeding events. The addition of aspirin to low- dose warfarin regimen does not provide any significant benefits and should be avoided. Therapy with aspirin is appropriate for patients who are at low risk of stroke or are unable to receive anticoagulants. AF patients treated with aspirin, should be periodically evaluated for development of high-risk features favoring anticoagulation.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Electric Countershock; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Many factors can influence the final decision to treat nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in the very elderly patient with anticoagulants. Therefore, a systemic approach in which the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk profiles are taken into account is suggested.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Geriatrics; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Randomized trials demonstrate a clear benefit of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke, but the proportion of eligible patients who are treated with anticoagulants remains low. The reluctance to treat all eligible patients with anticoagulants may be due to studies in clinical practice showing variable risk-benefit, raising concerns about application to general medical practice.. A systematic review of published medical literature was performed to identify studies of patients with atrial fibrillation who were treated with warfarin in actual clinical practice. Data from these studies were compared with pooled data from randomized controlled trials.. Three studies met the predefined criteria, each in a different health care setting, totaling 410 patients with 842 patient-years of follow-up. Patients in clinical practice were older and had more comorbid conditions compared with trial participants. However, the ischemic stroke rate was similar between clinical practice and randomized studies (1.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9%-2.7%] vs 1.4% [95% CI, 0.9%-2.0%]). Intracranial hemorrhage (0.1% [95% CI, 0%-0.3%] vs 0.3% [95% CI, 0.06%-0.5%]) and major bleeding (1.1% [95% CI, 0.4%-1.8%] vs 1.3% [95% CI, 0.8%-1.8%]) rates were also similar. There was a higher rate of minor bleeding in clinical practice than in trials (12.0% [95% CI, 9.7%-14.3%] vs 7.9% [95% CI, 6.6%-9.2%]).. Patients who undergo anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in actual clinical practice differ from those in randomized trials, but have similar rates of stroke and major bleeding. The risk of minor bleeding is higher and may require more intensive monitoring in practice.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients maintained on warfarin for atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves, or deep venous thrombosis may occasionally need to stop their anticoagulation during invasive procedures. This article reviews the literature on bleeding risks of certain procedures, thrombosis risks of stopping anticoagulation, and heparin and warfarin pharmacokinetics. Recommendations regarding how to manage anticoagulated patients are discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Loss, Surgical; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Perioperative Care; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation therapy has demonstrated benefit in the treatment and prevention of a variety of thromboembolic disorders. Most individuals who receive oral anticoagulant therapy are elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and acute or recurrent venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulation in elderly patients poses unique challenges for the practicing clinician because they are simultaneously at higher risk for recurrent thromboembolism and major bleeding, including catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage. The pharmacology of warfarin in the elderly is reviewed, including important drug interactions and current dosing recommendations for elderly patients. Evidence of the benefits and risks of oral anticoagulation therapy are reviewed for patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. This information should enable practitioners to better assess the relative risks and benefit of oral anticoagulation therapy to guide treatment decisions in the elderly.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The current published literature does not indicate whether the long-term effect of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy contributes to mortality reduction in patients with LV dysfunction. Evaluating patients for personal risk for emboli or for ischemic coronary artery events may influence the choice of therapies. As more is learned about the mechanisms of drug effects in different populations, physicians may be better able to direct appropriate therapies. Until that time, one must weigh the risks and benefits of each drug alone and in combination. In NYHA class IV patients, the risk for thrombosis owing to spontaneous clotting increases as does the adverse potential of warfarin and the adverse effects of inhibiting prostaglandin mediated vasodilation by aspirin. In NYHA class I and II patients, the quality of life and convenience of multidrug therapy is weighed against the devastating effect of a major stroke. In less symptomatic patients, the long-term risk for acute coronary events may be higher than previously identified. This would suggest that all patients with depressed LV function should be on some type of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. The current WATCH study will provide much needed information about the outcome differences between these agents. Conclusions based on available data include the following: Heart failure is increasing in incidence and prevalence. Atherosclerotic disease is an important causative factor for the development of heart failure or may be a comorbid condition in these patients. There is a measurable rate of stroke in patients with heart failure, although the cause of death in large studies is more often owing to sudden death or progressive heart failure. Sudden death may be from new ischemic events, asystole, or from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In patients with heart failure, not all strokes are cardioembolic in origin. The benefits and risks of warfarin may be increased as the EF worsens or heart failure functional class declines. The interactions of aspirin and ACE inhibitors have been best evaluated for the hemodynamic effects. There may be additional factors hitherto not studied. The hemodynamic effect of ACE inhibitors may be more important in NYHA classes III and IV than in less symptomatic patients. Warfarin use has clear indications for patients in atrial fibrillation with mechanical prosthetic valves, in hypercoagulable states, and with a previous history of embolization. Aspirin is inexpensive and commo

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cardiomyopathies; Comorbidity; Heart Failure; Humans; Life Style; Stroke; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Warfarin

Warfarin therapy has proved safe and effective in a number of randomized controlled trials of stroke prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), reducing the risk of stroke in these patients by two thirds. However, participants in the clinical trials were carefully selected and younger than patients in actual clinical practice.. This analysis sought to determine whether the results of clinical trials in patients with NV can be extrapolated to the general population seen in clinical practice.. A MEDLINE search from 1966 to the present was used to identify observational trials of anticoagulation in patients with NVAF that addressed warfarin use, anticoagulation control, efficacy, and complications. The search terms used were atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation.. Although warfarin prophylaxis against stroke in patients with NVAF appeared to be as well tolerated and effective in clinical practice as in clinical trials, it was generally underused, particularly in the elderly. Anticoagulation control was not as good in clinical practice as in clinical trials, although the rates of stroke and major bleeding were comparable.. Judicious use of warfarin, tailored to individual stroke risk, seems to be a reasonable policy. Warfarin therapy increases quality-adjusted survival in patients at high risk for stroke, and it is recommended for medium-risk patients unless their risk of bleeding is high or their quality of life while taking warfarin would be poor. Patients at a low risk for stroke will have equivalent health outcomes and incur lower costs if treated with aspirin. Despite the increased risk of hemorrhage in elderly patients, the net benefit of warfarin therapy is greater in this age group because of the higher risk of stroke. Active involvement of patients and their caregivers in an anticoagulation service setting may improve outcomes of anticoagulation therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; MEDLINE; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Electric Countershock; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Isoenzymes; Isoindoles; Male; Membrane Proteins; Middle Aged; Phenylbutyrates; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Risk; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Although advances are being made in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, its prevention is equally as important. Identification and management of risk factors are essential. Medical therapy is also helpful in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. There are currently four platelet-antiaggregating agents used to prevent ischemic stroke: aspirin, aspirin plus dipyridamole, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine. The relevant studies proving their efficacy are noted, as are some of their similarities and differences. The use of warfarin is also discussed.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing public health problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Numerous randomized controlled trials of warfarin have conclusively demonstrated that long-term anticoagulation therapy can reduce the risk for stroke by approximately 68% per year in patients with nonvalvular AF, and even more in patients with valvular AF. However, available data show that of those patients with AF and no contraindication to warfarin therapy, only 15% to 44% are prescribed warfarin. Our literature review has identified patient-, physician-, and health care system-related barriers to warfarin prescription. However, the relative importance of these specific barriers remains unknown. Further work is needed to understand the discrepancy between the randomized controlled trial evidence and clinical practice patterns.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Warfarin

Risk for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly heterogeneous. Increasing age, history of diabetes, hypertension, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, and poor ventricular function are independent risk factors for stroke in patients with AF. Accordingly, some groups of patients with AF have low risk and some have high risk. In general, patients at high risk benefit most from anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. In general, if a patient is younger than 65 years of age and has none of the defined risk factors, the stroke rate without prophylaxis (aspirin or warfarin) is low. In patients 65 to 75 years of age with no risk factors, the risk for stroke is low with either aspirin or warfarin therapy; the choice is left to the caretaking physician. All patients older than 75 years and all patients of any age who have risk factors obtain striking benefit from the use of anticoagulation with warfarin. This benefit far outweighs any risk for major hemorrhage.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with stroke commonly undergo investigations to determine the underlying cause of stroke. These investigations often include ambulatory electrocardiography to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding whether routine ambulatory electrocardiography should be performed in all or selected stroke patients. This paper reviews the available evidence on (1) the yield of ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and (2) the effectiveness of anticoagulation in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.. A MEDLINE search for primary articles was performed, and the references were reviewed manually. In addition, citations were obtained from experts. The evidence was systematically reviewed using the evidence-based methodology of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.. Ambulatory electrocardiography can detect atrial fibrillation not found on initial electrocardiogram in between 1% and 5% of people with stroke. Ambulatory electrocardiography is generally safe. The risk of recurrent stroke in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is uncertain, but appears to be similar to that seen with chronic atrial fibrillation (about 12% per year). Therapy with warfarin may reduce this risk by about two-thirds as compared to placebo. The annual risk of major bleeding with warfarin therapy is between 1% and 3% but rates for individual patients depend on various specific risk factors.. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of ambulatory electrocardiography for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in either selected or unselected patients with stroke (C Recommendation). There is fair evidence to recommend therapy with warfarin for patients with stroke and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (B Recommendation).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Stroke; Warfarin

At the acute phase of cerebral infarction, two recent large studies found that the use of aspirin reduces both mortality and the risk of the recurrence of stroke. In primary prevention, aspirin nearly halves the risk of myocardial infarction but does not reduce that of stroke. Concerning the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic brain infarcts, aspirin has been the most extensively studied drug, and is efficient between 50 mg and 1.3 g. In spite of the efficacy of other antiplatelets in this indication--ticlopidine (500 mg), clopidogrel (75 mg) and dipyridamole (400 mg)--aspirin remains the most cost-effective, doses between 100 and 300 mg being the most widely used. Cardiac diseases with a high embolic risk require the use of oral anticoagulation. In nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the choice of antithrombotic drugs depends on risk stratification: oral anticoagulants are indicated in high-risk subjects, whereas aspirin is recommended in low-risk subjects and when oral anticoagulants are contraindicated. Studies with associations of aspirin and other antiplatelets are required to increase the yield of this medication in high-risk subjects, in parallel with efforts to detect and to treat the vascular risk factors.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cerebral Infarction; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dipyridamole; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Prevention; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Vasodilator Agents; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation(AF) is a common arrhythmia that is an important independent risk factor for stroke. The overall risk of stroke in AF patients averages about 5%/y, but with wide variation depending on the presence of coexistent thromboembolic risk factors, which include increasing age, history of hypertension, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), and diabetes. AF patients with prior stroke or TIA are at highest risk(about 12%/y). Adjusted-dose warfarin(target INR 2.0-3.0) is highly efficacious for preventing stroke in AF patients, and is safe for selected patients. Aspirin has a modest effect on reducing stroke. Warfarin is recommended for high-risk AF patients who can safely receive it. Aspirin may be indicated for those with a low stroke risk and for those who cannot receive warfarin.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Humans; Hypertension; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Systemic embolic complications in patients with cardiomyopathy are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the lack of prospective, randomized control data, the literature supports the use of left ventricular ejection fraction as an important determinant of the need for systemic anticoagulation therapy in patients with systolic dysfunction. This review discusses the risks and benefits of systemic anticoagulation for patients with cardiomyopathy and proposes a treatment algorithm for its initiation.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Cardiomyopathies; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is associated with a sixfold increased risk for stroke. More than a dozen published randomized trials of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention provide solid evidence on which to base antithrombotic prophylaxis. Adjusted-dose warfarin reduces risk for stroke by about 60% compared with placebo, aspirin reduces this risk (primarily for nondisabling stroke) by about 20% compared with placebo, and warfarin reduces it by about 40% compared with aspirin. Warfarin provides maximal protection against stroke at international normalized ratios of 2.0 to 3.0. Risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation identifies those who potentially benefit most or least from anticoagulation; this is important because a substantial percentage of patients with atrial fibrillation have relatively low rates of stroke if they are given aspirin. Many elderly patients with recurrent intermittent atrial fibrillation experience high rates of stroke and benefit from anticoagulation. The value of precordial or transesophageal echocardiography in addition to clinical risk stratifiers for stratifying stroke risk is controversial. Altered hemostasis favoring thrombosis may contribute to formation of atrial appendage thrombus, but these conditions remain ill defined. The past decade has brought unprecedented progress toward understanding thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and has changed the clinical perspective of a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia into an important opportunity for stroke prevention. Making the most of this promise calls for appreciation of the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation and the concept of risk specificity in the face of diverse therapeutic options.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation could not be currently stopped even after successful thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation for at least 2 months. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes between a new oral anticoagulant and warfarin after thoracoscopic ablation. This trial was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study comparing edoxaban and warfarin in patients undergoing thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. This study enrolled 60 patients randomly assigned into 2 groups. The primary endpoint was efficacy outcomes, including stroke and systemic thromboembolic events. The secondary endpoint was safety outcomes including major bleeding and pericarditis. The patients were evaluated at discharge, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. No stroke and thromboembolic events were noted in both treatment groups during the follow-up period. During the 6 months follow-up period, 4 (13%) of 30 patients in the edoxaban group experienced minor bleeding events, whereas none were noted in the warfarin group. Five anticoagulation-related events (bleeding, and prolongation of international normalized ratio), including pericarditis, were noted in both the edoxaban and warfarin groups. No statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups. In conclusion, this study showed the comparable results of edoxaban to warfarin during the window period of post-thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Moreover, anticoagulation-related events were rather affected by patient factors and not by the anticoagulant type.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pericarditis; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Falls are always a concern regarding the balance of risk/benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants. In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients that had a fall/head injury reported in the RE-LY clinical trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) and to explore the safety of dabigatran (a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant).. We performed a post hoc retrospective analysis of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding outcomes in the RE-LY trial with 18 113 individuals with atrial fibrillation, according to the status occurrence of falls (or head injury) reported as adverse events. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to provide adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI.. In the study, 974 falls or head injury events were reported among 716 patients (4%). These patients were older and had more frequently comorbidities such as diabetes, previous stroke, or coronary artery disease. Patients with fall had a higher risk of major bleeding (HR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.90-3.05]), intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.35-2.13]), and mortality (HR, 3.91 [95% CI, 2.51-6.10]) compared to those who did not have reported falls or head injury. Among patients who had falls, those allocated to dabigatran showed a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.98]) compared with warfarin.. In this population, the risk of falls is important and confers a worse prognosis, increasing intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding. Patients who fell and were under dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial hemorrhage risk than those anticoagulated with warfarin, but the analysis was merely exploratory.

Topics: Accidental Falls; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Craniocerebral Trauma; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is the ratio between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts measured in peripheral blood. NLR is easily calculable based on a routine blood test available worldwide and may reflect systemic inflammation. However, the relationship between NLR and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not well-described.. We calculated NLR at baseline in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, a randomized trial comparing edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with AF followed for 2.8 years (median). The association of baseline NLR with major bleeding events, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiovascular death, stroke/systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality were calculated.. The median baseline NLR in 19,697 patients was 2.53 (interquartile range 1.89-3.41). NLR was associated with major bleeding events (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.41-1.80), stroke/systemic embolism (HR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44), MI (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.41-2.12), MACE (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.56-1.84), CV (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.74-2.13) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.83-2.18). The relationships between NLR and outcomes remained significant after adjustment for risk factors. Edoxaban consistently reduced major bleeding. MACE, and CV death across NLR groups vs. warfarin.. NLR represents a widely available, simple, arithmetic calculation that could be immediately and automatically reported during a white blood cell differential measurement to identify patients with AF at increased risk of bleeding, CV events, and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Early warfarin anticoagulation is recommended in patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. It is unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be a full alternative to warfarin. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in patients early after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.. The Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients after Heart Valve Repair or Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement study was a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, clinical trial conducted from December 2017 to September 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (60 mg or 30 mg once daily) or warfarin for the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical thromboembolic events, or asymptomatic intracardiac thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding.. Of 220 participants, 218 (109 per group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 4 patients (3.7%) taking warfarin and none taking edoxaban (risk difference, -0.0367; 95% confidence interval, -0.0720 to -0.0014; P < .001 for noninferiority). The primary safety outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) taking warfarin and 3 patients (2.8%) taking edoxaban (risk difference, 0.0183; 95% confidence interval, -0.0172 to 0.0539; P = .013 for noninferiority).. Edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing thromboembolism and is potentially comparable for risk of major bleeding during the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by venous, arterial, or microvascular thrombosis. Patients with TAPS merit indefinite anticoagulation, and warfarin has historically been the standard treatment. Apixaban is an oral factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulant that requires no dose adjustment or monitoring. The efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin for TAPS patients remain unknown. This multicenter prospective randomized open-label blinded endpoint study assigned anticoagulated TAPS patients to apixaban or warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2-3) for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was clinically overt thrombosis and vascular death. Apixaban was first given at 2.5 mg twice daily. Two protocol changes were instituted based on recommendations from the data safety monitoring board. After the twenty-fifth patient was randomized, the apixaban dose was increased to 5 mg twice daily, and after the thirtieth patient was randomized, subjects with prior arterial thrombosis were excluded. Primary outcomes were adjudicated by independent experts blinded to treatment allocation. Patients randomized between 23 February 2015 and 7 March 2019 to apixaban (n = 23) or warfarin (n = 25) were similar. Among the components of the primary efficacy outcome, only stroke occurred in 6 of 23 patients randomized to apixaban compared with 0 of 25 patients randomized to warfarin. The study ended prematurely after the forty-eighth patient was enrolled. Conclusions from our study are limited due to protocol modifications and low patient accrual. Despite these limitations, our results suggest that apixaban may not be routinely substituted for warfarin to prevent recurrent thrombosis (especially strokes) among patients with TAPS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02295475.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Edoxaban 60 mg is approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not fulfilling any dose-reduction criteria. As edoxaban is partially renally cleared (≈50%), this study compared pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban 60 mg once daily with edoxaban 75 mg once daily in patients with AF with high renal clearance (creatinine clearance > 100 mL/min) over 12 months. Primary PK and pharmacodynamics end points were plasma edoxaban exposure and anti-factor Xa (FXa) concentration. A population PK model estimated edoxaban exposure at steady state. Efficacy and safety outcomes included composites of stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Of 607 patients, 303 and 304 were randomized to edoxaban 60 and 75 mg, respectively. Edoxaban 75 mg provided ≈25% higher exposure than 60 mg. This increase was accurately depicted in the population PK model; anti-factor Xa concentration correlated with edoxaban exposure. Rates of composite and individual outcomes were similarly low between doses. In conclusion, the 25% increase in edoxaban dose (60-75 mg) resulted in ≈25% exposure increase in the 75-mg group. Higher exposure was not associated with reduced stroke risk in patients with AF with high renal clearance.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher rates of stroke and bleeding. Both higher dose edoxaban (60/30 mg) and lower dose edoxaban (30/15 mg) were non-inferior to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and significantly reduced major bleeding in AF patients in the global study to assess the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban vs standard practice of dosing with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial. Whether the efficacy and safety of these dosing strategies vs. warfarin are consistent in patients with AF and PAD has not been described.. Of 21 105 patients with AF randomized to warfarin, edoxaban 60/30 mg, or edoxaban 30/15 mg, 841 were identified with PAD. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), SSE, and major bleeding. Patients with PAD had higher risk of MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.57, P = 0.001] and cardiovascular (CV) death (HRadj 1.49, 95% CI 1.21-1.83, P < 0.001) than those without PAD, but not major bleeding. The efficacy of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin was consistent regardless of PAD (SSE HR; PAD 1.16, 95% CI 0.42-3.20; no-PAD 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.02, P-interaction 0.57) as was major bleeding (PAD 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.70; no-PAD 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, P-interaction 0.54). Edoxaban 30/15 mg was inferior for SSE, with significant heterogeneity when stratified by PAD status (P-interaction 0.039).. Patients with AF and PAD are at heightened risk of MACEs and CV death vs. those without PAD. The efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin in AF are consistent regardless of PAD; however, edoxaban 30/15 mg is inferior for stroke prevention in AF patients with PAD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs warfarin in high-risk subgroups.. While underuse of anticoagulation in high-risk patients with AF remains common, substitution of effective and safer alternatives to warfarin, such as edoxaban, represents an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background Guidelines promote shared decision-making (SDM) for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. We recently showed that adding a within-encounter SDM tool to usual care (UC) increases patient involvement in decision-making and clinician satisfaction, without affecting encounter length. We aimed to estimate the extent to which use of an SDM tool changed adherence to the decided care plan and clinical safety end points. Methods and Results We conducted a multicenter, encounter-level, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of UC with versus without an SDM conversation tool for use during the clinical encounter (Anticoagulation Choice) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation considering starting or reviewing anticoagulation treatment. We conducted a chart and pharmacy review, blinded to randomization status, at 10 months after enrollment to assess primary adherence (proportion of patients who were prescribed an anticoagulant who filled their first prescription) and secondary adherence (estimated using the proportion of days for which treatment was supplied and filled for direct oral anticoagulant, and as time in therapeutic range for warfarin). We also noted any strokes, transient ischemic attacks, major bleeding, or deaths as safety end points. We enrolled 922 evaluable patient encounters (Anticoagulation Choice=463, and UC=459), of which 814 (88%) had pharmacy and clinical follow-up. We found no differences between arms in either primary adherence (78% of patients in the SDM arm filled their first prescription versus 81% in UC arm) or secondary adherence to anticoagulation (percentage days covered of the direct oral anticoagulant was 74.1% in SDM versus 71.6% in UC; time in therapeutic range for warfarin was 66.6% in SDM versus 64.4% in UC). Safety outcomes, mostly bleeds, occurred in 13% of participants in the SDM arm and 14% in the UC arm. Conclusions In this large, randomized trial comparing UC with a tool to promote SDM against UC alone, we found no significant differences between arms in primary or secondary adherence to anticoagulation or in clinical safety outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02905032.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Participation; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) have bee excluded from all major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In this pilot RCT, 40 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or warfarin. No patients experienced symptomatic ischemic strokes and systemic embolic events (the primary composite study outcome) during a 12-month follow-up. No major bleeding was reported. During the follow-up, 18.2% of patients in both groups showed echocardiographic signs of increased thrombogenicity in the left atrial appendage. The rate of silent cerebral ischemia was 13.3% in the rivaroxaban group and 17.6% in the warfarin group at brain magnetic resonance imaging.. Our results suggest acceptable efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe MS and are encouraging for larger RCTs in this so far neglected setting (NCT03926156).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Mitral Valve Stenosis; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Long-term use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is necessary for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The effectiveness and safety of OACs in extremely older patients (ie, aged 80 years or older) with AF and at high risk of bleeding needs to be elucidated.. To examine the effects of very low-dose edoxaban (15 mg) vs placebo across 3 age strata (80-84 years, 85-89 years, and ≥90 years) among patients with AF who were a part of the Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients (ELDERCARE-AF) trial.. This prespecified subanalysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted from August 5, 2016, to December 27, 2019. Patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were not considered candidates for standard-dose OACs were included in the study; reasons these patients could not take standard-dose OACs included low creatinine clearance (<30 mL per minute), low body weight (≤45 kg), history of bleeding from critical organs, continuous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or concomitant use of antiplatelet drugs. Eligible patients were recruited randomly from 164 hospitals in Japan and were randomly assigned 1:1 to edoxaban or placebo.. Edoxaban (15 mg once daily) or placebo.. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety end point was International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis-defined major bleeding.. A total of 984 patients (mean [SD] age: age group 80-84 years, 82.2 [1.4] years; age group 85-89 years, 86.8 [1.4] years; age group ≥90 years, 92.3 [2.1] years; 565 women [57.4%]) were included in this study. In the placebo group, estimated (SE) event rates for stroke or systemic embolism increased with age and were 3.9% (1.2%) per patient-year in the group aged 80 to 84 years (n = 181), 7.3% (1.7%) per patient-year in the group aged 85 to 89 years (n = 184), and 10.1% (2.5%) per patient-year in the group aged 90 years or older (n = 127). A 15-mg dose of edoxaban consistently decreased the event rates for stroke or systemic embolism with no interaction with age (80-84 years, hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.31; P = .13; 85-89 years, HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.99; P = .05; ≥90 years, HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.68; P = .008; interaction P = .65). Major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were numerically higher with edoxaban, but the differences did not reach statistical significance, and there was no interaction with age. There was no difference in the event rate for all-cause death between the edoxaban and placebo groups in all age strata.. Results of this subanalysis of the ELDERCARE-AF randomized clinical trial revealed that among Japanese patients aged 80 years or older with AF who were not considered candidates for standard OACs, a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban was superior to placebo in preventing stroke or systemic embolism consistently across all 3 age strata, including those aged 90 years or older, albeit with a higher but nonstatistically significant incidence of bleeding.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02801669.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Treatment persistence for anticoagulant therapy is important in preventing thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Understanding drug utilization pattern and treatment changes in oral anticoagulant (OAC) users may facilite better NVAF management. Thus, our study aimed to examine OAC treatment patterns preceding events leading to switch or discontinuation and medication adherence in Korean NVAF patients.. We conducted a drug utilization study on all Korean patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) newly prescribed OACs between July 2015 and November 2016 using the national claims data. We assessed treatment changes such as switching and discontinuation from index OAC and relevant events preceding the change and examined patient characteristics as predictors of changes that occurred among OAC users. Medication adherence was compared among OAC users by calculating the medication possession ratio (MPR).. A total of 48,389 NVAF patients were identified who initiated OACs within the study period. Most initiated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (22% apixaban, 24% dabigatran, 37% rivaroxaban), and 18% initiated warfarin. The frequency of switch to another OAC was 8.8% for apixaban, 16.1% for dabigatran, 6.6% for rivaroxaban, and 19.1% for warfarin. The frequency of discontinuation was lower for apixaban (22.9%), dabigatran (26.3%), and rivaroxaban (25.7%) than warfarin (31.6%). Compared to warfarin, NOAC users were less likely to switch treatment. Thromboembolic event was the most common clinical event preceding switch from warfarin to NOAC and from NOAC to warfarin. Discontinuation of OAC was often preceded by a bleeding event. Patients who initiated apixaban showed significantly higher mean MPR compared to those on dabigatran and warfarin.. In real-world practice in Korea, we have observed treatment change to be common in OAC users. Our results indicate better medication adherence with NOACs than with warfarin. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03572972).. Anticoagulants are drugs that thin blood with the purpose of preventing thromboembolic disease (e.g., stroke), which is a disease occurring when a blood clot forms or blocks vessel. Maintaining treatment for anticoagulation is important to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. To understand current drug usage pattern and treatment changes related to oral anticoagulants (OAC) we examined OAC treatment patterns and preceding events that led to drug switch or stop and medication maintenance by Korean AF patients.The study was conducted by utilizing the Korean national claims data from July 2015 to November 2016. All AF patients who newly started taking OAC were included in the analysis. In total, 48,389 patients were identified with most (83%) taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), which are newer generation blood thinners, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, and 18% taking warfarin, the conventional blood thinner. Compared to warfarin, NOAC users were less likely to switch to other treatment. NOAC users discontinued the treatment less frequently than warfarin users. Thromboembolic events commonly preceded switch between OACs. Patients who stopped taking OACs were often confronted with a bleeding event before stopping treatment. Apixaban takers showed higher treatment persistence compared to dabigatran or warfarin users. In this study, we determined that treatment change is common in OAC-using patients. The results suggest that NOAC users may better adhere to treatment than warfarin users.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Utilization; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin is the standard anticoagulation therapy for valvular atrial fibrillation (AF); however, new oral anticoagulants have emerged as an alternative. We compared the efficacy and safety of dabigatran with conventional treatment in AF associated with left-sided valvular heart disease (VHD), including mitral stenosis (MS). Patients with AF and left-sided VHD were randomly assigned to receive dabigatran or conventional treatment. The primary end point was the occurrence of clinical stroke or a new brain lesion (silent brain infarct and microbleed) on 1-year follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging. Patients in the dabigatran group were switched from warfarin (n = 52), antiplatelets alone (n = 5), or no therapy (n = 2) to dabigatran. In the conventional group, 53 used warfarin (including 42 MS patients), and 7 used antiplatelets. No death or clinical stroke event occurred in either group during follow-up. Silent brain infarct and microbleed occurred in 20 and 2 patients in the dabigatran group and 20 and 4 patients in the conventional treatment group. The incidence rate of the primary end point did not significantly differ between groups (34% vs 40%, relative risk 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.29, p = 0.491). The primary end point rate was similar between groups in 82 patients (40 in the dabigatran group and 42 in the conventional group) with MS (32% vs 34%, relative risk 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.50, p = 0.759). In conclusion, primary end point rates after treatment with dabigatran were similar to conventional treatment in patients with significant VHD and AF. New oral anticoagulants could be a reasonable alternative to warfarin in patients with AF and VHD, which should be confirmed in future large-scale studies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Data are limited regarding the risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Determine the efficacy and safety of apixaban or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and aspirin or placebo according to prior stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or thromboembolism (TE).. In this prospective, multicenter, 2-by-2 factorial, randomized clinical trial, post hoc parallel analyses were performed to compare randomized treatment regimens according to presence or absence of prior stroke/TIA/TE using Cox proportional hazards models. Patients with AF, recent ACS or PCI, and planned use of P2Y12 inhibitors for 6 months or longer were included; 33 patients with missing data about prior stroke/TIA/TE were excluded.. Apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg twice daily) or VKA and aspirin or placebo.. Major or clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding.. Of 4581 patients included, 633 (13.8%) had prior stroke/TIA/TE. Patients with vs without prior stroke/TIA/TE were older; had higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores; and more frequently had prior bleeding, heart failure, diabetes, and prior oral anticoagulant use. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major or CRNM bleeding and death or hospitalization than VKA in patients with (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.03) and without (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.82) prior stroke/TIA/TE. Patients without prior stroke/TIA/TE receiving aspirin vs placebo had higher rates of bleeding; this difference appeared less substantial among patients with prior stroke/TIA/TE (P = .01 for interaction). Aspirin was associated with numerically lower rates of death or ischemic events than placebo in patients with (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.20) and without (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.21) prior stroke/TIA/TE (not statistically significant).. The safety and efficacy of apixaban compared with VKA was consistent with the AUGUSTUS findings, irrespective of prior stroke/TIA/TE. Aspirin increased major or CRNM bleeding, particularly in patients without prior stroke/TIA/TE. Although aspirin may have some benefit in patients with prior stroke, our findings support the use of apixaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin for the majority of patients with AF and ACS and/or PCI, regardless of prior stroke/TIA/TE status.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02415400.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is endorsed by guidelines to improve care of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether the benefit of ABC pathway-concordant care is consistent across anticoagulants remains unclear. We assessed the association between ABC-concordant care and outcomes in this post hoc analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, which was reported prior to the initial description of the ABC pathway.. Patients were retrospectively classified as receiving ABC-concordant care based on optimal anticoagulation, adequate rate control, management of co-morbidities and lifestyle measures. Associations between ABC-concordance and outcomes were assessed with adjustment for components of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. Of 20 926 patients, 7915 (37.8%) satisfied criteria of ABC-concordant care, which was associated with significantly lower incidence of stroke or systemic embolic event [stroke/SEE: hazard ratio (HRadj): 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.63], major bleeding (HRadj 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.75), major adverse cardiac events (HRadj 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.58), primary net clinical outcome (composite of stroke/SEE, major bleeding or death; HRadj 0.61; 95% CI: 0.56-0.65), cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization (HRadj 0.78; 95% CI: 0.74-0.83), CV death (HRadj 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46-0.58), and all-cause mortality (HRadj 0.56; 95% CI: 0.51-0.62), P < 0.001 for each. These associations were qualitatively consistent for both edoxaban and warfarin and across patient subgroups.. Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway-concordant care is associated with reductions across multiple CV endpoints and all-cause mortality, with benefit in edoxaban- and warfarin-treated patients and across patient subgroups. Increasing implementation of ABC-concordant care may improve clinical outcomes of patients with AF irrespective of anticoagulant.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Pathways; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Testing of factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation has been limited.. We enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease who had any of the following: a CHA. Of 4565 enrolled patients, 4531 were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 years, and 72.3% were women. Permanent discontinuation of trial medication was more common with rivaroxaban than with vitamin K antagonist therapy at all visits. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the vitamin K antagonist group had a primary-outcome event. Survival curves were nonproportional. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the vitamin K antagonist group (difference, -76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -31; P<0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the vitamin K antagonist group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, -72 days; 95% CI, -117 to -28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted.. Among patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonist therapy led to a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events or death than rivaroxaban therapy, without a higher rate of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer; INVICTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02832544.).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Background We investigated the predictors related to major bleeding events during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg in patients aged ≥80 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk, for whom standard oral anticoagulants are inappropriate, focusing on standard laboratory tests related to bleeding. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subanalysis of the on-treatment analysis set of the ELDERCARE-AF (Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients) trial. Major bleeding was the primary safety end point. The event rates were calculated according to prespecified characteristics at baseline. A total of 984 Japanese patients were randomly assigned to edoxaban 15 mg or placebo (n=492, each). During the study period, 20 and 11 major bleeding events occurred in the edoxaban and placebo groups, respectively. The adjusted analysis revealed that hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.57 [95% CI, 1.10-11.55]) and prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds; (aHR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.05-8.02]) independently predicted major bleeding, while creatinine clearance <30 mL/min showed a tendency towards an increase in major bleeding (aHR, 2.68; 95% CI, 0.96-7.46). In patients treated with edoxaban lacking these 3 risk factors, no major bleeding occurred; major bleeding event rates increased with each risk factor. Patients with 3 risk factors were significantly more likely to have a major bleeding event at 11.05%/year (HR, 7.15 [95% CI, 1.92-26.71]). Conclusions In elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with high bleeding risk, baseline hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL, prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds, and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min may predict major bleeding during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg. Registration URL: ELDERCARE-AF https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique number: NCT02801669.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Observational studies support a role for oral anticoagulation to reduce the risk of dementia in atrial fibrillation patients, but conclusive data are lacking. Since dabigatran offers a more stable anticoagulation, we hypothesized it would reduce cognitive decline when compared to warfarin in old patients with atrial fibrillation.. The GIRAF trial was a 24-month, randomized, parallel-group, controlled, open-label, hypothesis generating trial. The trial was done in six centers including a geriatric care unit, secondary and tertiary care cardiology hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged ≥ 70 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1. The primary endpoint was the absolute difference in cognitive performance at 2 years. Patients were assigned 1:1 to take dabigatran (110 or 150 mg twice daily) or warfarin, controlled by INR and followed for 24 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 2 years with a comprehensive and thorough cognitive evaluation protocol of tests for different cognitive domains including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a composite neuropsychological test battery (NTB), and computer-generated tests (CGNT).. Between 2014 and 2019, 5523 participants were screened and 200 were assigned to dabigatran (N = 99) or warfarin (N = 101) treatment. After adjustment for age, log of years of education, and raw baseline score, the difference between the mean change from baseline in the dabigatran group minus warfarin group was - 0.12 for MMSE (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.88 to 0.63; P = 0.75), 0.05 (95% CI - 0.07 to 0.18; P = 0.40) for NTB, - 0.15 (95% CI - 0.30 to 0.01; P = 0.06) for CGNT, and - 0.96 (95% CI - 1.80 to 0.13; P = 0.02) for MoCA, with higher values suggesting less cognitive decline in the warfarin group.. For elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, and without cognitive compromise at baseline that did not have stroke and were adequately treated with warfarin (TTR of 70%) or dabigatran for 2 years, there was no statistical difference at 5% significance level in any of the cognitive outcomes after adjusting for multiple comparisons.. Cognitive Impairment Related to Atrial Fibrillation Prevention Trial (GIRAF), NCT01994265 .

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brazil; Cognition; Dabigatran; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

There are no randomized data evaluating the safety or efficacy of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis and with atrial fibrillation (AF).. The RENAL-AF trial (Renal Hemodialysis Patients Allocated Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome evaluation (PROBE) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients receiving hemodialysis with AF and a CHA. From January 2017 through January 2019, 154 patients were randomly assigned to apixaban (n=82) or warfarin (n=72). The trial stopped prematurely because of enrollment challenges. Time in therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) for warfarin-treated patients was 44% (interquartile range, 23%-59%). The 1-year rates for major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 32% and 26% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.30]), whereas 1-year rates for stroke or systemic embolism were 3.0% and 3.3% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Death was the most common major event in the apixaban (21 patients [26%]) and warfarin (13 patients [18%]) arms. The pharmacokinetic substudy enrolled the target 50 patients. Median steady-state 12-hour area under the curve was 2475 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 1342-3285) for 5 mg of apixaban twice daily and 1269 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 615-1946) for 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily. There was substantial overlap between minimum apixaban blood concentration, 12-hour area under the curve, and maximum apixaban blood concentration for patients with and without a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event.. There was inadequate power to draw any conclusion regarding rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Clinically relevant bleeding events were ≈10-fold more frequent than stroke or systemic embolism among this population on anticoagulation, highlighting the need for future randomized studies evaluating the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation among patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02942407.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently prescribed for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thrombosis. There is a lack of published data on the utilization of DOACs in individuals who have undergone recent cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients postcardiac surgery.. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were separated into a DOAC cohort or a warfarin cohort based on the agent they received after cardiac surgery. Patients could be included if they were ≥18 years of age and received or were discharged on either rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin within 7 days after cardiac surgery. The primary outcome for the study was the rate of International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding during hospitalization and for 30 days following discharge or until first follow-up appointment.. There were a total of 194 patients included in the analysis, 97 in the DOAC cohort and 97 in the warfarin cohort. Four patients (4.1%) in the DOAC group experienced ISTH major bleeding, while 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.68). No patients in the DOAC cohort experienced a thrombotic event, whereas 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced a thrombotic complication (p = 0.5).. Apixaban and rivaroxaban demonstrated similar safety when compared to a matched cohort of warfarin patients. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of prior pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), caused by incomplete clot dissolution after PE. In patients with CTEPH, lifelong anticoagulation is mandatory to prevent recurrence of PE and secondary in situ thrombus formation. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is commonly used for anticoagulation in CTEPH based on historical experience and evidence. The anticoagulant activity of warfarin is affected by food and drug interactions, requiring regular monitoring of prothrombin time. The lability of anticoagulant effect often results in haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. Thus, lifelong warfarin is a handicap in terms of safety and convenience. Currently, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in CTEPH has increased with the advent of four DOACs. The safety of DOACs is superior to warfarin, with less intracranial bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban, the latest DOAC, also has proven efficacy and safety for those diseases in two large clinical trials; the ENGAGE-AF trial and HOKUSAI-VTE trial. The present trial seeks to evaluate whether edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in preventing worsening of CTEPH.. The KABUKI trial (is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, warfarin-controlled, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin (vitamin K Antagonist) in subjects with chronic thromBoembolic pUlmonary hypertension taking warfarin (vitamin K antagonIst) at baseline) is designed to prove the non-inferiority of edoxaban to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with CTEPH.. This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, including positive, negative and inconclusive results.. NCT04730037.. This paper was written per the study protocol V.4.0, dated 29 January 2021.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This manuscript describes the rationale and design of a randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes with Warfarin vs Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.. New onset atrial fibrillation commonly occurs after cardiac surgery and is associated with increased rates of stroke and mortality. in nonsurgical patients with atrial fibrillation, NOACs have been shown to confer equivalent benefits for stroke prevention with less bleeding risk and less tedious monitoring requirements compared with Warfarin. However, NOAC use has yet to be adopted widely in cardiac surgery patients.. The NEW-AF study has been designed as a pragmatic, prospective, randomized controlled trial that will compare financial, convenience and safety outcomes for patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery that are treated with NOACs versus Warfarin.. Study results may contribute to optimizing the options for stroke prophylaxis in cardiac surgery patients and catalyze more widespread application of NOAC therapy in this patient population.. The study is ongoing and actively enrolling at the time of the publication. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov under registration number NCT03702582.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The effect of different anticoagulants on recanalization after cerebral venous thrombosis has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial.. RE-SPECT CVT (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02913326) was a Phase III, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter, exploratory trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Acute cerebral venous thrombosis patients were allocated to dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, or dose-adjusted warfarin, for 24 weeks, after 5-15 days' treatment with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. A standardized magnetic resonance protocol including arterial spin labeling, three-dimensional time-of-flight venography, and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was obtained at the end of the treatment period. Cerebral venous recanalization at six months was assessed by two blinded adjudicators, using the difference in a score of occluded sinuses and veins (predefined secondary efficacy endpoint) and in the modified Qureshi scale (additional endpoint), between baseline and the end of the treatment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cerebral Veins; Dabigatran; Humans; Prospective Studies; Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist to treat left ventricular (LV) thrombus after myocardial infarction (MI). Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting are limited. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of apixaban vs. warfarin in treating LV thrombus after MI.. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicentre open-label clinical trial including patients with LV thrombus detected by 2D transthoracic echocardiography 1-14 days after acute MI. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in three medical centres; 17 patients were randomized to warfarin and 18 patients to apixaban. The primary outcome was the presence and size of LV thrombus 3 months after initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, stroke or systemic embolism, re-hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Mean LV thrombus size at enrolment was 18.5 mm × 12.3 mm in the warfarin group and 19.9 mm × 12.4 mm in the apixaban group (P = NS). Thirty-two patients completed 3 months follow-up. In the warfarin group, two patients withdrew, and in the apixaban group one patient died. Thrombus completely resolved in 14 of 15 patients in the warfarin group and in 16 of 17 patients in the apixaban group (P = NS and P = 0.026 for non-inferiority). Two patients had major bleeding in the warfarin group, while no major bleeding events were recorded in the apixaban group. There was one stroke in the warfarin group and one death in the apixaban group.. Our results suggest that apixaban is non-inferior to warfarin for treatment of patients with LV thrombus after acute MI with a 20% non-inferiority margin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. We compared the incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium following AF ablation among patients receiving edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin and between normal- and low-dose use of edoxaban and rivaroxaban.. This prospective randomized study included 170 consecutive AF patients. Patients taking DOACs upon admission to our hospital were randomly assigned to an edoxaban group or to a rivaroxaban group. Warfarin was continued in patients receiving warfarin at admission. All patients underwent AF ablation, and cerebral MRI was performed to evaluate asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism the day after the procedure.. Sixty-one patients were assigned to edoxaban and 63 to rivaroxaban. Warfarin was continued in 46 patients. Although asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was detected in 25 patients (16.3%), there were no significant differences among the groups. Hemopericardium occurred in 2 patients (one each in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups). The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was higher in the low-dose group (9 patients, 25.7%) than in the normal-dose group (8 patients, 10.0%) for patients prescribed either edoxaban or rivaroxaban (p < 0.05). The proportion of males (88.0%, 69.5%, p < 0.05), history of prior AF ablation (64.0%, 42.2%, p < 0.05), and hypertension (68.0%, 46.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in patients with cerebral thromboembolism.. The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium in AF ablation was similar among patients using edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. However, low doses of DOACs may increase the risk of asymptomatic stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Bioprosthesis; Brazil; Cause of Death; Creatinine; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome was a prospective randomized, open-label, noninferiority study conducted in 14 centers in Italy. Rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in high-risk, triple-positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.. The aim of this paper is to report the events during the 2-year follow-up after the study closure.. On January 28, 2018, the trial was prematurely stopped by adjudication and safety committee for an excess of events in the rivaroxaban group. Randomized patients were advised on trial results and those randomized to rivaroxaban were solicited to switch to warfarin. All 14 participating centers were asked and accepted to follow their patients for clinical events. This report describes the rate of events that occurred between January 28, 2018, and January 28, 2020.. Of 120 randomized patients, 115 were available for follow-up. Outcome events were two in six (33.3%) patients who remained on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and six in 109 (5.7%) patients on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-34.5, P = .018). The two patients on DOACs (one taking dabigatran and one taking rivaroxaban) suffered from thromboembolic events, whereas of the six patients with composite outcomes on warfarin, three had thromboembolic events (HR for thrombosis 13.3; 95% CI 2.2-79.9, P = .005).. These data further support the use of warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Italy; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban..  The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days..  A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups.. In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL.. NCT03566303.

Topics: Adult; Brain Infarction; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Endpoint Determination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

ROCKET AF demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (ROW).. ROCKET AF enrolled 14,264 patients from 45 countries. Of these, 1,878 (13.2%) were from 7 Latin American countries. The clinical characteristics and outcomes (adjusted by baseline characteristics) of these patients were compared with 12,293 patients from the ROW. Treatment outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were also stratified by region.. The annual rate of stroke/SE was similar in those from Latin American and ROW (P= .63), but all-cause and vascular death were significantly higher than in ROW (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.64; HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68; P< .001). Rates of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding tended to be lower in Latin America (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.0; P= .05). Rates of stroke and/or SE were similar with rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients from Latin America and ROW (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.29 vs HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P= .77).. Patients with AF in Latin America had similar rates of stroke and/or SE, higher rates of vascular death, and lower rates of bleeding compared with patients in the ROW. The effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Latin America was similar to the ROW. Further studies analyzing patient- and country-specific determinants of these regional differences in Latin America are warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Latin America; Male; Mortality; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling; Warfarin

Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines-based on available evidence from mostly observational studies-suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection.. We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0-3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) and MRI outcomes (new ischaemic or haemorrhagic brain lesions) in the per-protocol population, assessed at 14 days (clinical and MRI outcomes) and 90 days (clinical outcomes only) after commencing treatment. Non-inferiority of aspirin would be shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the absolute risk difference between groups was less than 12% (non-inferiority margin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02046460.. Between Sept 11, 2013, and Dec 21, 2018, we enrolled 194 patients; 100 (52%) were assigned to the aspirin group and 94 (48%) were assigned to the vitamin K antagonist group. The per-protocol population included 173 patients; 91 (53%) in the aspirin group and 82 (47%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (23%) of 91 patients in the aspirin group and in 12 (15%) of 82 patients in the vitamin K antagonist group (absolute difference 8% [95% CI -4 to 21], non-inferiority p=0·55). Thus, non-inferiority of aspirin was not shown. Seven patients (8%) in the aspirin group and none in the vitamin K antagonist group had ischaemic strokes. One patient (1%) in the vitamin K antagonist group and none in the aspirin group had major extracranial haemorrhage. There were no deaths. Subclinical MRI outcomes were recorded in 14 patients (15%) in the aspirin group and in 11 patients (13%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. There were 19 adverse events in the aspirin group, and 26 in the vitamin K antagonist group.. Our findings did not show that aspirin was non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of cervical artery dissection.. Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Funds Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Academic Society Basel.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Adult; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection; Denmark; Female; Germany; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenprocoumon; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Switzerland; Vertebral Artery Dissection; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation experience an irregular heart rate and have an increased risk of stroke; prophylactic treatment with anticoagulation medication reduces this risk. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved providing an alternative to vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. There is interest from regulatory bodies on the effectiveness of medications in routine clinical practice; however, uncertainty remains regarding the suitability of non-interventional data for answering questions on drug effectiveness and on the most suitable methods to be used. In this study, we will use data from Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE)-the pivotal trial for the DOAC apixaban-to validate non-interventional methods for assessing treatment effectiveness of anticoagulants. These methods could then be applied to analyse treatment effectiveness in people excluded from or under-represented in ARISTOTLE.. Patient characteristics from ARISTOTLE will be used to select a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics from two UK electronic health record (EHR) databases, Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold and Aurum (between 1 January 2013 and 31 July 2019). Methods such as propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching will be explored in matching between EHR treatment groups to determine the optimal method of obtaining a balanced cohort.Absolute and relative risk of outcomes in the EHR trial-analogous cohort will be calculated and compared with the ARISTOTLE results; if results are deemed compatible the methods used for matching EHR treatment groups can then be used to examine drug effectiveness over a longer duration of exposure and in special patient groups of interest not studied in the trial.. The study has been approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee of the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Results will be disseminated in scientific publications and at relevant conferences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Humans; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; United Kingdom; Warfarin

To clarify the appropriate initial dosage of heparin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving uninterrupted nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment.. A total of 187 consecutive AF patients who underwent their first RFCA in our center were included. In the warfarin group (WG), an initial heparin dose of 100 U/kg was administered (control group: n = 38). The patients who were on NOACs were randomly divided into 3 NOAC groups (NG: n = 149), NG110, NG120, and NG130, and were administered initial heparin doses of 110 U/kg, 120 U/kg, and 130 U/kg, respectively. During RFCA, the activated clotting time (ACT) was measured every 15 min, and the target ACT was maintained at 250-350 s by intermittent heparin infusion. The baseline ACT and ACTs at each 15-min interval, the average percentage of measurements at the target ACT, and the incidence of periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic complications were recorded and analyzed.. There was no significant difference in sex, age, weight, or baseline ACT among the four groups. The 15 min-ACT, 30 min-ACT, and 45 min-ACT were significantly longer in the WG than in NG110 and NG120. However, no significant difference in 60 min-ACT or 75 min-ACT was detected. The average percentages of measurements at the target ACT in NG120 (82.2 ± 23.6%) and NG130 (84.8 ± 23.7%) were remarkably higher than those in the WG (63.4 ± 36.2%, p = 0.007, 0.003, respectively). These differences were independent of the type of NOAC. The proportion of ACTs in 300-350 s in NG130 was higher than in WG (32.4 ± 31.8 vs. 34.7 ± 30.6, p = 0.735). Severe periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding complications were not observed.. For patients with AF receiving uninterrupted NOAC treatment who underwent RFCA, an initial heparin dosage of 120 U/kg or 130 U/kg can provide an adequate intraprocedural anticoagulant effect, and 130 U/kg allowed ACT to reach the target earlier.. Registration number: ChiCTR1800016491, First Registration Date: 04/06/2018 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; China; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

The RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial demonstrated that higher-risk patients with atrial fibrillation had lower rates of stroke or systemic embolism and a similar rate of major bleeding, on average, when treated with dabigatran 150mg compared to warfarin. Since population-level averages may not apply to individual patients, estimating the heterogeneity of treatment effect can improve application of RE-LY in clinical practice.. For 18040 patients randomized in RE-LY, we used patient-level data to develop multivariable models to predict the risk for stroke or systemic embolism and for major bleeding including all three treatment groups (dabigatran 110mg, dabigatran 150mg, and warfarin) over a median follow up of 2.0 years. The mean predicted absolute risk reduction (ARR) for stroke/systemic embolism with dabigatran 150mg compared to warfarin was 1.32% (range 11.6% lower to 3.30% higher risk). The mean predicted ARR for bleeding was 0.41% (range 8.93% lower to 63.4% higher risk). Patients with increased stroke/systemic embolism risk included those with prior stroke/TIA (OR 2.01), diabetics on warfarin (OR 2.00), and older patients on dabigatran 150mg (OR 1.68 for every 10-year increase). Major bleeding risk was higher in patients on aspirin (OR 1.25), with a history of diabetes (OR 1.34) or prior stroke/TIA (OR 1.22), those with heart failure on dabigatran 110mg (OR 1.52), older patients on either dabigatran 110mg or 150mg (OR 1.57 and 1.93, respectively, for each 10-year increase), and heavier patients on dabigatran 110mg or 150mg; patients in a region outside the United States and Canada and with better renal function had lower bleeding risk.. There is substantial heterogeneity in the benefits and risks of dabigatran relative to warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation. Using individualized estimates may enable shared decision making and facilitate more appropriate use of dabigatran; as such, it should be prospectively tested.. www.clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Canada; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

Vascular calcification is common in diabetic patients. Warfarin has been associated with renovascular calcification and worsening renal function; rivaroxaban may provide renopreservation by decreasing vascular inflammation. We compared the impact of rivaroxaban and warfarin on renal outcomes in diabetic patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Using United States IBM MarketScan data from January 2011 to December 2017, we identified adults with both NVAF and diabetes, newly-initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin with ≥12-month insurance coverage prior to anticoagulation initiation. Patients with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or undergoing haemodialysis at baseline were excluded. Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores (absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all after adjustment). Outcomes included incidence rates of emergency department/hospital admissions for acute kidney injury (AKI) and the composite of the development of Stage 5 CKD or need for haemodialysis. Patients were followed until an event, index anticoagulant discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end-of-data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. We assessed 10 017 rivaroxaban (22.6% received a reduced dose) and 11 665 warfarin users. In comparison to warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of AKI (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74-0.92) and development of Stage 5 CKD or need for haemodialysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses had similar effects as the base-case analysis.. Rivaroxaban appears to be associated with lower risks of undesirable renal outcomes vs. warfarin in diabetic NVAF patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin; Young Adult

Extrapolation of clinical trial results comparing warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users experiencing major hemorrhage to clinical care is challenging due to differences seen among non-randomized oral anticoagulant users, bleed location, and etiology. We hypothesized that inpatient all-cause-mortality among patients presenting with major hemorrhage differed based on the home-administered anticoagulant medication class, DOAC versus warfarin.. More than 1.5 million hospitalizations were screened and 3731 patients with major hemorrhage were identified in the REDS-III Recipient Database. Propensity score matching and stratification were used to account for potentially confounding factors.. Inpatient all-cause-mortality was lower for DOAC (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.45-0.80, p = 0.0005) before accounting for confounding and competing events. Inpatient all-cause-mortality for 1266 propensity-score-matched patients compared using proportional hazards regression did not differ (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.58-1.22, p = 0.36). Inpatient all-cause-mortality in stratified analyses (warfarin as reference) produced: HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.31-1.55) for traumatic head injuries; HR = 1.10 (95%CI 0.62-1.95) for non-traumatic head injuries; HR = 0.62 (95%CI 0.20-1.94) for traumatic, non-head injuries; and HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.29-1.63) for non-traumatic, non-head injuries. Mean time to discharge was shorter for DOAC (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05-1.30, p = 0.0034) in the propensity score matched analysis. Plasma transfusion occurred in 42% of warfarin hospitalizations and 11% of DOAC hospitalizations. Vitamin K was administered in 63% of warfarin hospitalizations.. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics, location of bleed, and traumatic injury, inpatient survival was no different in patients presenting with major hemorrhage while on DOAC or warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Component Transfusion; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inpatients; Plasma; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

A history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may impact decisions about anticoagulation treatment. We sought to determine whether prior GIB in patients with AF taking anticoagulants was associated with an increased risk of stroke or major hemorrhage.. We analyzed key efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with prior GIB in ARISTOTLE. Centrally adjudicated outcomes according to GIB history were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for randomized treatment and established risk factors.. In patients with AF on oral anticoagulants, prior GIB was associated with an increased risk of subsequent major GIB but not stroke, intracranial bleeding, or all-cause mortality. For the key outcomes of stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, death, and major bleeding, we found no evidence that the treatment effect (apixaban vs. warfarin) was modified by a history of GIB.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Variation in patient characteristics and practice patterns may influence outcomes at a regional level.. We assessed differences in demographics, practice patterns, outcomes, and the effect of apixaban compared with warfarin in ARISTOTLE (n = 18,201) by prespecified regions: North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The primary outcomes were stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding.. Compared with other regions, patients from Asia Pacific were younger, more women were enrolled in Latin America. Coronary artery disease was more prevalent in Europe and Asia Pacific had the highest rate of prior stroke and renal impairment. Over 50% of patients in North America were taking ≥9 drugs at randomization, compared with 10% in Latin America. North America had the highest rates of temporary study drug discontinuation and procedures. Time in therapeutic range (INR 2.0-3.0) on warfarin was highest in North America and lowest in Asia Pacific. After adjustment and compared with Europe, patients in Asia Pacific had 2-fold higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism and 3-fold higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Patients in Latin America had 2-fold increased risk of all-cause death compared with Europe. The benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent across regions; there was a pronounced reduction in major bleeding in patients from Asia Pacific compared with other regions (p-interaction = 0.03).. Patients with AF enrolled in prespecified regions in ARISTOTLE had differences in clinical baseline characteristics and practice patterns. After adjustment, patients in Asia Pacific and Latin America had worse outcomes than patients from other regions. The relative benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent across regions with an even greater treatment effect in the reduction of bleeding in patients from Asia Pacific.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial, patients with atrial fibrillation and ≥2 dose-adjustment criteria (age ≥80 years, weight ≤60 kg, or creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl [133 μmol/l]) were randomized to receive apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or warfarin.. The purpose of this study was to describe the effects of apixaban dose adjustment on clinical and pharmacological outcomes.. Patients receiving the correct dose of study drug were included (n = 18,073). The effect of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily versus warfarin on population pharmacokinetics, D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (PF1+2), and clinical outcomes was compared with the standard dose (5 mg twice daily).. Patients receiving apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily exhibited lower apixaban exposure (median area under the concentration time curve at a steady state 2,720 ng/ml vs. 3,599 ng/ml; p < 0.0001) than those receiving the standard dose. In patients with ≥2 dose-adjustment criteria, reductions in D-dimers (p interaction = 0.20) and PF1+2 (p interaction = 0.55) were consistent with those observed in the standard-dose population. Patients with ≥2 dose-adjustment criteria (n = 751) were at higher risk for stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death than the standard-dose population (0 or 1 dose-adjustment criterion, n = 17,322). The effect of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily versus warfarin in the ≥2 dose-adjustment criteria population was consistent with the standard dose in the reductions in stroke or systemic embolism (p interaction = 0.26), major bleeding (p interaction = 0.25), and death (p interaction = 0.72).. Apixaban drug concentrations were lower in patients receiving 2.5 mg twice daily compared with 5 mg twice daily. However, the effects of apixaban dose adjustment to 2.5 mg versus warfarin were consistent for coagulation biomarkers and clinical outcomes, providing reassuring data on efficacy and safety. (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]; NCT00412984).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Anticoagulant therapy is used for stroke prevention and proved to be effective and safe in the long term. The study aims to analyse the cost-effectiveness relationship of using of direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists to prevent ischaemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including all the active ingredients marketed in Spain, prescribed for 2 years in the Primary Care service of the Institut Català de la Salut.. Population-based cohort study, in which the cost of the 2 treatment groups will be evaluated. Direct costs (pharmacy, primary care, emergency and hospitalization) and indirect costs (lost productivity) will be included from a social perspective. Effectiveness (assessed as the occurrence of a health event, the 1 of primary interest being stroke) will be determined, with a 2-year time horizon and a 3% discount rate. The average cost of the 2 groups of drugs will be compared using a regression model to determine the factors with the greatest influence on determining costs. We will carry out a univariate ('one-way') deterministic sensitivity analysis.. We hope to provide relevant information about direct and indirect costs of oral anticoagulants, which, together with aspects of effectiveness and safety, could help shape the consensual decision-making of evaluating bodies.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic; Primary Health Care; Safety; Spain; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The global COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus entering human cells using angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a cell surface receptor. ACE2 is shed to the circulation, and a higher plasma level of soluble ACE2 (sACE2) might reflect a higher cellular expression of ACE2. The present study explored the associations between sACE2 and clinical factors, cardiovascular biomarkers, and genetic variability.. Plasma and DNA samples were obtained from two international cohorts of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (n = 3999 and n = 1088). The sACE2 protein level was measured by the Olink Proteomics® Multiplex CVD II96 × 96 panel. Levels of the biomarkers high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, D-dimer, and cystatin-C were determined by immunoassays. Genome-wide association studies were performed by Illumina chips. Higher levels of sACE2 were statistically significantly associated with male sex, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and older age. The sACE2 level was most strongly associated with the levels of GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and hs-cTnT. When adjusting for these biomarkers, only male sex remained associated with sACE2. We found no statistically significant genetic regulation of the sACE2 level.. Male sex and clinical or biomarker indicators of biological ageing, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes are associated with higher sACE2 levels. The levels of GDF-15 and NT-proBNP, which are associated both with the sACE2 level and a higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular disease, might contribute to better identification of risk for severe COVID-19 infection.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Betacoronavirus; Biomarkers; Cohort Studies; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Pneumonia, Viral; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Stroke; Warfarin

The effects of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve remain uncertain.. In this randomized trial, we compared rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) with dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve. The primary outcome was a composite of death, major cardiovascular events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, or hospitalization for heart failure), or major bleeding at 12 months.. A total of 1005 patients were enrolled at 49 sites in Brazil. A primary-outcome event occurred at a mean of 347.5 days in the rivaroxaban group and 340.1 days in the warfarin group (difference calculated as restricted mean survival time, 7.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 16.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Death from cardiovascular causes or thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 26 (5.1%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.20). The incidence of stroke was 0.6% in the rivaroxaban group and 2.4% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 13 (2.6%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.35). The frequency of other serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.. In patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the mean time until the primary outcome of death, major cardiovascular events, or major bleeding at 12 months. (Funded by PROADI-SUS and Bayer; RIVER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02303795.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Warfarin

Although randomized trials provide a high level of evidence regarding the efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the results of such trials may differ from those observed in day-to-day clinical practice.. To compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between NOAC and warfarin in clinical practice.. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who started warfarin/NOACs between January 2015 and November 2016 were retrospectively identified from Korea's nationwide health insurance claims database. Using inpatient diagnosis and imaging records, the Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for NOACs relative to warfarin.. Of the 48,389 patients, 10,548, 11,414, 17,779 and 8,648 were administered apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Many patients had suffered prior strokes (36.7%, 37.7%, 31.4%, and 32.2% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), exhibited high CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8, 4.6, 4.6, and 4.1 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) and HAS-BLED (3.7, 3.6, 3.6, and 3.3 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) scores, had received antiplatelet therapy (75.4%, 75.7%, 76.8%, and 70.1% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), or were administered reduced doses of NOACs (49.8%, 52.9%, and 42.8% in apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban group, respectively). Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a significantly lower S/SE risk [HR, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.62, 0.54-0.71; 0.60, 0.53-0.69; and 0.71, 0.56-0.88, respectively] than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran (HR, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.51-0.66 and 0.75, 0.60-0.95, respectively), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.69-1.04), showed a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.. Among Asian patients who were associated with higher bleeding risk, low adherence, and receiving reduced NOAC dose than that provided in randomised controlled trials, all NOACs were associated with a significantly lower S/SE risk and apixaban and dabigatran with a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Aim To evaluate safety of using rivaroxaban in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or transient, stable decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to 15-29 ml /min / 1.73 m2 in the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF).Material and methods This multicenter prospective, randomized study included patients admitted to cardiology departments from 2017 through 2019. Of 10 224 admitted patients 109 (3 %) patients with AF and stage 4 CKD or a stable decline of GFR to 15-29 ml /min / 1.73 m2 were randomized at 2:1 ratio to the rivaroxaban 15 mg /day (n=73) treatment group or to the warfarin treatment group (n=36). The primary endpoint was development of BARC and ISTH major, minor, and clinically relevant minor bleeding. Mean follow-up duration was 18 months.Results Patients receiving warfarin had a significantly higher incidence of BARC (n=26 (72.2 %) vs. n=31 (42.4 %), р<0.01) and ISTH (n=22 (61.1 %) vs. n=27 (36.9 %), p<0.01) minor bleeding and all ISTH clinically relevant (minor clinically relevant and major bleedings) n=10 (27.7 %) vs. n=8 (10.9 %), р=0.03]. The number of repeated hospitalizations was 65 (43% of patients) in the rivaroxaban treatment group and 27 (48% of patients) in the warfarin treatment group (р=0.57), including 24 (36.9 %) and 11 (40.7 %) emergency admissions in the rivaroxaban and warfarin treatment groups, respectively (р=0.96). Significant improvement of changes in creatinine clearance and GFR (by CKD-EPI and Cockroft-Gault) was observed in the rivaroxaban treatment group.Conclusion The study provided evidence for a more beneficial safety profile of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients with AF and advanced CKD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and thyroid disease are clinically distinct from those with AF and no thyroid disease is unknown. Furthermore, the effectiveness of anticoagulation for prevention of AF-related thromboembolic events in patients with thyroid disease has not been adequately studied. Patients enrolled in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation, which compared apixaban with warfarin in patients with AF (n = 18,201), were categorized by thyroid disease history at randomization (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and no thyroid disease). Adjusted hazard ratios derived from Cox models were used to compare outcomes by thyroid disease history. Associations between randomized treatment and outcomes by thyroid disease history were examined using Cox models with interaction terms. A total of 18,021/18,201 (99%) patients had available thyroid disease history at randomization: 1,656 (9%) had hypothyroidism, 321 (2%) had hyperthyroidism, and 16,044 (89%) had no thyroid disease. When compared with those without a history of thyroid disease, patients with hypo- or hyperthyroidism were more likely to be female (60.4% vs 32.1%; 52.0% vs 32.1%; both p <0.0001). Patients with hypothyroidism were older (73 vs 70 years, p <0.0001) and more likely to have had previous falls (8.7% vs 4.3%, p <0.0001). There was no difference in clinical outcomes by thyroid disease history. The benefit of apixaban compared with warfarin was similar regardless of thyroid disease history (interaction p >0.10). In conclusion, despite differences in baseline characteristics of patients with and without thyroid disease, their clinical outcomes were similar. The benefit of apixban compared with warfarin was preserved regardless of thyroid disease history.

Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Hyperthyroidism; Hypothyroidism; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Sex Distribution; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The potential role of new oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) remains uncertain.. To determine whether rivaroxaban is noninferior to dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thrombotic APS.. 3-year, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial. (EU Clinical Trials Register: EUDRA [European Union Drug Regulatory Authorities] code 2010-019764-36).. 6 university hospitals in Spain.. 190 adults (aged 18 to 75 years) with thrombotic APS.. Rivaroxaban (20 mg/d or 15 mg/d, according to renal function) versus dose-adjusted VKAs (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0, or 3.1 to 4.0 in patients with a history of recurrent thrombosis).. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with new thrombotic events; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin for risk ratio (RR) was 1.40. Secondary outcomes included time to thrombosis, type of thrombosis, changes in biomarker levels, cardiovascular death, and nonmajor bleeding.. After 3 years of follow-up, recurrent thrombosis occurred in 11 patients (11.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and 6 (6.3%) in the VKA group (RR in the rivaroxaban group, 1.83 [95% CI, 0.71 to 4.76]). Stroke occurred more commonly in patients receiving rivaroxaban (9 events) than in those receiving VKAs (0 events) (corrected RR, 19.00 [CI, 1.12 to 321.9]). Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients (6.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and 7 (7.4%) in the VKA group (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.30 to 2.46]). Post hoc analysis suggested an increased risk for recurrent thrombosis in rivaroxaban-treated patients with previous arterial thrombosis, livedo racemosa, or APS-related cardiac valvular disease.. Anticoagulation intensity was not measured in the rivaroxaban group.. Rivaroxaban did not show noninferiority to dose-adjusted VKAs for thrombotic APS and, in fact, showed a non-statistically significant near doubling of the risk for recurrent thrombosis.. Bayer Hispania.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Compare the effect of apixaban and warfarin on coagulation and primary haemostasis biomarkers in atrial fibrillation (AF).. The biomarker substudy from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation trial included 4850 patients with AF randomised to treatment with apixaban or warfarin. Sixty per cent of patients used vitamin K antagonist (VKA) within 7 days before randomisation. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), D-dimer, soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen were analysed at randomisation and after 2 months of study treatment.. In patients not on VKA treatment at randomisation, F1+2 and D-dimer levels were decreased by 25% and 23%, respectively, with apixaban, and by 59% and 38%, respectively, with warfarin (p<0.0001 for treatment differences for both). In patients on VKA at randomisation, F1+2 and D-dimer levels increased by 41% and 10%, respectively, with apixaban and decreased by 37% and 11%, respectively, with warfarin (p<0.0001 for treatment differences for both). sCD40L levels were slightly increased at 2 months, regardless of VKA or randomised treatment. Apixaban and warfarin also both reduced vWF antigen regardless of VKA treatment. The efficacy (stroke) and safety (bleeding) of apixaban compared with warfarin was similar irrespectively of biomarker levels at 2 months.. Treatment with apixaban compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF was associated with less reduction in thrombin generation and fibrin turnover. This effect of apixaban could contribute to the clinical results where apixaban was superior to warfarin both in stroke prevention and in reducing bleeding risk.. NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Female; Fibrin; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging due to increased thrombotic and bleeding risks. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with AF and a history of cancer.. ROCKET AF randomized 14 264 patients with AF to rivaroxaban or warfarin with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cancer history and clinical outcomes, and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in these patients. A total of 640 patients enrolled in ROCKET AF had a history of cancer, with the most common types being prostate (28.6%), colorectal (16.1%), and breast (14.7%) cancer. Patients with a history of cancer were older, more frequently male, more likely to have prior vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use and had higher rates of overall bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.47; P < 0.0001] and non-cardiovascular death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07; P = 0.031) compared with those with no cancer history. There were no significant associations between cancer history and stroke, venous thromboembolism, or myocardial infarction. The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for prevention of stroke/systemic embolism was similar in those with and without a history of cancer (interaction P-value = 0.21).. In ROCKET AF, a history of cancer was associated with a higher risk of bleeding and non-cardiovascular death, but not ischaemic events. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were not significantly different in patients with and without a history of cancer. The results of this study are exploratory and should be taken in context of the study population, which may not be generalizable to those with advanced malignancy. Further investigation is needed to understand optimal anticoagulation strategies in patients with AF and cancer.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantations and generator changes are frequently performed in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. In an exploratory analysis, we investigated the outcome of patients undergoing such device procedures in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.. During the trial, 1217 device procedures were performed in 1145 patients, with intervention dates available for 1203 procedures. Two hundred and twenty-five procedures (in 212 patients) were performed >30 days after study drug was stopped and are not included in the event analysis. For most interventions (n = 728, 74%), study drug was interrupted >3 days (median for the entire cohort: 5 days, interquartile range 0-11 days); 250 interventions were performed with ≤3 days study drug interruption. During the first 30 days after the procedure, six strokes/systemic embolic events (SEEs) (three each in the lower-dose edoxaban and warfarin arm) and one major bleeding event (in the lower-dose edoxaban arm) occurred; no stroke/SEEs or major bleeds occurred around the 295 device procedures in the higher-dose edoxaban arm. Two ischaemic and one major bleeding event occurred after the 288 device procedures performed with ≤3 days periprocedural interruption of study drug.. In this first experience of patients undergoing device surgery with edoxaban, a low risk of ischaemic and bleeding events was observed during the first 30 days post-procedure. Our data are in line with current recommendations of no or only brief interruption of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants prior to cardiac device surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Defibrillators, Implantable; Device Removal; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pacemaker, Artificial; Prosthesis Implantation; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have multi-morbidity, defined as ≥3 comorbid conditions. Multi-morbidity is associated with polypharmacy, adverse events, and frailty potentially altering response to anticoagulation. We sought to describe the prevalence of multi-morbidity among older patients with AF and determine the association between multi-morbidity, clinical outcomes, and the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin.. In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial, we studied enrolled patients age ≥ 55 years (n = 16,800). Patients were categorized by the number of comorbid conditions at baseline: no multi-morbidity (0-2 comorbid conditions), moderate multi-morbidity (3-5 comorbid conditions), and high multi-morbidity (≥6 comorbid conditions). Association between multi-morbidity and clinical outcomes were analyzed by treatment with a median follow-up of 1.8 (1.3-2.3) years.. Multi-morbidity is prevalent among the population with AF; efficacy and safety of apixaban is preserved in this subgroup supporting extension of trial results to the most complex AF patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multimorbidity; Polypharmacy; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Prior studies suggested that the risks of ischaemic stroke and bleeding in patients of Asian race with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be higher than that of non-Asians. In the analysis of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we compared clinical outcomes, edoxaban concentration, and anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) activity, between Asian and non-Asian races.. There were 2909 patients of Asian race and 18 195 non-Asian race in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The risks of thromboembolism and bleeding events were compared for Asians and non-Asians treated with warfarin. The trough levels of edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity were also compared and correlated with the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs. warfarin. Compared to non-Asian patients, the Asian population was on average 2 years younger and 20 kg lighter. In the warfarin group, the adjusted risk of ischaemic stroke did not differ significantly for patients of Asian and non-Asian race [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.12, P = 0.56). Asians treated with warfarin had a higher-adjusted risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH: aHR 1.71, P = 0.03) compared with non-Asians. The trough edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity were 20-25% lower for Asians compared with non-Asians. Compared to warfarin, higher dose edoxaban significantly reduced ICH while preserving the efficacy of stroke prevention in both Asians and non-Asians. Two of three net clinical outcomes appeared to be more favourably reduced with edoxaban in Asians compared with non-Asians (Pint = 0.063 for primary, 0.037 for secondary, and 0.032 for third net clinical outcomes, respectively).. Compared to warfarin, higher dose edoxaban preserved the efficacy for stroke prevention and was associated with a favourable safety profile for Asians, which may be due to the lower trough edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity achieved in patients of Asian race.

Topics: Aged; American Indian or Alaska Native; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Black People; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; White People

To investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with AF were randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) or edoxaban. The cohort (N = 21 028) included patients across BMI categories (kg/m2): underweight (<18.5) in 0.8%, normal (18.5 to <25) in 21.4%, overweight (25 to <30) in 37.6%, moderately obese (30 to <35) in 24.8%, severely obese (35 to <40) in 10.0%, and very severely obese (≥40) in 5.5%. In an adjusted analysis, higher BMI (continuous, per 5 kg/m2 increase) was significantly and independently associated with lower risks of stroke/systemic embolic event (SEE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, P = 0.0001], ischaemic stroke/SEE (HR 0.87, P < 0.0001), and death (HR 0.91, P < 0.0001), but with increased risks of major (HR 1.06, P = 0.025) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.05, P = 0.0007). There was a significant interaction between sex and increasing BMI category, with lower risk of ischaemic stroke/SEE in males and increased risk of bleeding in women. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Factor Xa activity were similar across BMI groups >18.5 kg/m2, while time in therapeutic range for warfarin improved significantly as BMI increased (P < 0.0001). The effects of edoxaban vs. warfarin on stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and net clinical outcome were similar across BMI groups.. An increased BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of stroke/SEE, better survival, but increased risk of bleeding. The efficacy and safety profiles of edoxaban were similar across BMI categories ranging from 18.5 to >40.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Comorbidity; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Overweight; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin treatment is commonly started with a fixed loading dose that might be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. An individual maintenance dose can then be estimated based on a pharmacogenetic algorithm. Starting treatment with the estimated dose implies a longer time to reach the therapeutic range. Our goal was to compare the safety and efficacy of initiating warfarin treatment with a loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics versus a maintenance dose. The primary endpoint was time in the therapeutic range (TTR) in the first 10 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints were time to the first international normalized ratio (INR) in therapeutic range (2.0-3.0) and occurrence of serious adverse events. Consenting cardioembolic stroke patients were genotyped for CYP2C9 (cytochrome P450 2C9 gene) and VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1 gene) polymorphisms and a maintenance warfarin dose was estimated. Patients were randomized into two groups. The loading dose group (LDG) patients received twice the estimated dose in the first 2 days of treatment. The maintenance dose group (MDG) patients received the estimated dose directly from day one. The TTR in the first 10 days was significantly higher in the LDG than in the MDG (50.5% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.003). The time to the first INR in this range was significantly shorter in the LDG (5.24 vs. 7.3 days). There were no significant differences in the INR above this range or serious adverse events. Warfarin loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics after recent cardioembolic stroke improved the efficacy of warfarin initiation without increasing the risk of adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

To compare patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin on clinical outcomes including stroke, systemic embolism (SE), bleeding events, and cost of care.. This retrospective observational study used Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug and fully insured commercial claims from the Humana Research Database. Patients with AF who initiated a DOAC or warfarin from January 1, 2012, through September 30, 2015, were included. Date of the first prescription of DOAC or warfarin was the index date. Patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups were matched on propensity scores. Patients were censored at end of enrollment or study period, discontinuation, or switch of index medication. Clinical outcomes were compared in the matched groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Annualized costs and costs adjusted for censoring using Lin's interval method were also compared between the two cohorts.. Patients on DOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.98), hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.46-0.92), SE (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.65), and composite outcome of stroke or SE (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86) compared with patients on warfarin. Bleeding risk was not statistically significant (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01). While annualized pharmacy costs were higher, annualized medical and total costs were lower in the DOAC group compared with the warfarin group.. The results of the study indicated that patients on DOACs had lower rates of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, SE, and composite outcome of stroke or SE compared with patients on warfarin. No significant differences in bleeding rates between the DOAC and warfarin groups were observed, while total cost of care was lower in the DOAC group.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medicare Part C; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Warfarin is dependent on multiple hepatic enzymes for metabolism while apixaban is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transport and hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism. The aim of this analysis was to assess the impact of interacting medication use on the treatment effects of apixaban versus warfarin. Outcomes were compared between apixaban and warfarin using Cox proportional hazards modeling according to the use of interacting medications at randomization in ARISTOTLE (n = 18,201). Interacting medications for apixaban were identified as combined P-gp and 3A4 inhibitors or inducers while interacting medications for warfarin were defined as those highly probable for warfarin potentiation or inhibition. At randomization, 5547 (30.5%) patients were on an interacting medication, including 2722 on apixaban and 2825 on warfarin. Patients using an interacting medication were more likely to be female, taking aspirin, and have a history of prior bleeding and were less likely to have a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. No significant differences were observed on the treatment effect of apixaban compared with warfarin in patients on and off interacting medications for outcomes including the primary efficacy outcome of stroke or systemic embolism (P for interaction = 0.79) or the primary safety outcome of major bleeding (P for interaction = 0.75). Use of interacting medications with anticoagulants occurs often in patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite the potential for altered exposure, interacting medication use was not associated with a significant change in the efficacy or safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in the ARISTOTLE trial.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00412984.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation, safety and efficacy with dabigatran dual therapy were evaluated in pre-specified subgroups of patients undergoing PCI due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI, and those receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment.. In the RE-DUAL PCI trial, 2725 patients were randomized to dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg with P2Y12 inhibitor, or warfarin with P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. Mean follow-up was 14 months, 50.5% had ACS, and 12% received ticagrelor. The risk of the primary endpoint, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, was reduced with both dabigatran dual therapies vs. warfarin triple therapy in patients with ACS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.47 (0.35-0.63) for 110 mg and 0.67 (0.50-0.90) for 150 mg]; elective PCI [0.57 (0.43-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.76 (0.56-1.03) for 150 mg]; receiving ticagrelor [0.46 (0.28-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.59 (0.34-1.04) for 150 mg]; or clopidogrel [0.51 (0.41-0.64) for 110 mg and 0.73 (0.58-0.91) for 150 mg], all interaction P-values >0.10. Overall, dabigatran dual therapy was comparable to warfarin triple therapy for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or unplanned revascularization, with minor variations across the subgroups, all interaction P-values >0.10.. The benefits of both dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in reducing bleeding risks were consistent across subgroups of patients with or without ACS, and patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in younger individuals. In some but not all observational studies, it has been associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. Both antiplatelet agents (APs) and anticoagulants (ACs) are used to reduce stroke risk, but whether 1 treatment strategy is more effective is unknown.. To determine whether AP or AC therapy is more effective in preventing stroke in cervical dissection and the risk of recurrent stroke in a randomized clinical trial setting. A secondary outcome was to determine the effect on arterial imaging outcomes.. Randomized, prospective, open-label international multicenter parallel design study with central blinded review of both clinical and imaging end points. Recruitment was conducted in 39 stroke and neurology secondary care centers in the United Kingdom and 7 centers in Australia between February 24, 2006, and June 17, 2013. One-year follow-up and analysis was conducted in 2018. Two hundred fifty participants with extracranial carotid and vertebral dissection with symptom onset within the last 7 days were recruited. Follow-up data at 1 year were available for all participants.. Randomization to AP or AC (heparin followed by warfarin) for 3 months, after which the choice of AP and AC agents was decided by the local clinician.. The primary end point was ipsilateral stroke and death. A planned per protocol (PP) analysis was performed in patients meeting the inclusion criteria following central review of imaging to confirm the diagnosis of dissection. A secondary end point was angiographic recanalization in those with imaging confirmed dissection.. Two hundred fifty patients were randomized (118 carotid and 132 vertebral), 126 to AP and 124 to AC. Mean (SD) age was 49 (12) years. Mean (SD) time to randomization was 3.65 (1.91) days. The recurrent stroke rate at 1 year was 6 of 250 (2.4%) on ITT analysis and 5 of 197 (2.5%) on PP analysis. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for any outcome. Of the 181 patients with confirmed dissection and complete imaging at baseline and 3 months, there was no difference in the presence of residual narrowing or occlusion between those receiving AP (n = 56 of 92) vs those receiving AC (n = 53 of 89) (P = .97).. During 12 months of follow-up, the number of recurrent strokes was low. There was no difference between treatment groups in outcome events or the rate of recanalization.. ISRCTN.com Identifier: CTN44555237.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection; Clopidogrel; Dipyridamole; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vertebral Artery Dissection; Warfarin; Young Adult

The optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement or native valve repair remains uncertain.. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs warfarin in patients with AF and a history of BPV replacement or native valve repair.. Using data from Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) (n = 18 201), a randomized trial comparing apixaban with warfarin in patients with AF, we analyzed the subgroup of patients (n = 251) with prior valve surgery. We contacted sites by telephone to obtain additional data about prior valve surgery. Full data were available for 156 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke/systemic embolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Treatment groups were compared using a Cox regression model.. In ARISTOTLE, 104 (0.6%) patients had a history of BPV replacement (n = 73 [aortic], n = 26 [mitral], n = 5 [mitral and aortic]) and 52 (0.3%) had a history of valve repair (n = 50 [mitral], n = 2 [aortic]). Among patients with BPVs, 55 were randomized to apixaban and 49 to warfarin. Among those with a history of native valve repair, 32 were randomized to apixaban and 20 to warfarin. Overall clinical event rates were low, with no significant differences between apixaban and warfarin for any outcomes.. In patients with AF and a history of BPV replacement or repair, the safety and efficacy of apixaban compared with warfarin was consistent with results from ARISTOTLE. These data suggest that apixaban may be reasonable for patients with BPVs or prior valve repair, though future larger randomized trials are needed. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heart Valves; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the RE-DUAL PCI trial of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dabigatran dual therapy (110 or 150 mg bid, plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor) reduced International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding events compared with warfarin triple therapy, with noninferiority in overall thromboembolic events. This analysis assessed outcomes in relation to patient bleeding and stroke risk profiles, based on the modified HAS-BLED and CHA. The primary endpoint, major bleeding event (MBE) or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event (CRNMBE), was compared across study arms in patients categorized by modified HAS-BLED score 0-2 or ≥3. The composite endpoint of death, thromboembolic event, and unplanned revascularization rates was compared in patients categorized by CHA. Risk of MBE or CRNMBE was lower with dabigatran dual therapy (both doses) versus warfarin triple therapy, irrespective of modified HAS-BLED category (treatment-by-subgroup interaction P-value 0.584 and 0.273 for dabigatran 110 and 150 mg dual therapy, respectively, vs warfarin). Risk of the composite thromboembolic endpoint was similar across CHA. Dabigatran dual therapy reduced bleeding events irrespective of bleeding risk category and demonstrated similar efficacy regardless of stroke risk category when compared with warfarin triple therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Warfarin is evidence-based therapy for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke, but has not been studied for its effects on whole blood viscosity (WBV). This study investigated the effect of warfarin versus aspirin on WBV in patients presenting with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and acute cardioembolic stroke.. We enrolled patients with acute cerebral infarction, aged 56-90 years who had NVAF, CHADS. Total 67 patients were included, and 56 completed this study (33 warfarin and 23 aspirin). Compared to baseline values, warfarin reduced post-treatment BV at all shear rates. The BV reductions greater than 1 cP measured at shear rates of 300, 150, 5, and 1 s. Warfarin confers greater reductions in BV than aspirin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke. BV could be a useful method to estimate thrombotic risk in patients receiving warfarin.. KCT0001291 , Date of Registration: 2014-12-01.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Viscosity; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- Ischemic stroke (IS) secondary to atrial fibrillation (AF) is largely preventable with the use of anticoagulation. We sought to identify race-ethnicity and sex disparities with the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), aspirin, and warfarin in IS patients with AF and to identify temporal trends in the utilization of these medications. Methods- The FLiPER-AF Stroke Study (Florida Puerto Rico Atrial Fibrillation) included 24 040 IS cases enrolled in the Florida-Puerto Rico Collaboration to Reduce Stroke Registry from 2010 to 2016. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the effect of race-ethnicity and sex on utilization of DOACs, aspirin, and warfarin for stroke prevention in AF after adjustment for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical factors. Results- Among 24 040 IS cases, 54% were women and 10% black, 12% FL-Hispanics, 4% PR-Hispanic, and 74% whites. From 2010 to 2016, DOAC use increased from 0% to 36%, warfarin use decreased from 51% to 17%, and aspirin use remained relatively stable (42%-40%). After adjustment, blacks had higher odds of warfarin (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.40) prescription at discharge compared with whites. Men had higher rates of aspirin (42.1% versus 38.8%), warfarin (33.6% versus 28.9%), and DOAC (21.3% versus 19.3%) use compared with women. After adjustment, women had lower odds of being discharged on aspirin (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98) or warfarin (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99). There was no sex difference in use of DOACs. Conclusions- Our study confirmed the increasing use of DOACs, downtrending use of warfarin, whereas aspirin use remained similar over the years. There are sex and race-ethnicity disparities in anticoagulation use in IS patients with AF. It is critical to understand underlying drivers of these disparities to develop better practice strategies for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03627806.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Female; Florida; Humans; Male; Puerto Rico; Registries; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and safety with respect to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the proportion of patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in clinical trials was low and the applicability of their results to very elderly patients is still uncertain. We have carried out a prospective cohort study on AF patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in the Survey on anticoagulaTed pAtients RegisTer (START2-Register) and treated with either VKAs or DOACs, with the aim to evaluate mortality, bleeding and thrombotic rates during a long-term follow-up. We enrolled 1124 patients who started anticoagulation at ≥85 years with VKA (58.7%) or DOACs (41.3%), Clinical characteristics of patients were similar, except for a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease and renal failure in VKAs patients and of a history of previous bleeding and previous stroke/TIA in patients on DOACs. Median CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, 47 major bleedings (rate 2.3 x100 pt-yrs) and 19 stroke/TIA (0.9 x100 pt-yrs) were recorded. The incidence of bleeding was similar between patients on VKAs and DOACs. Patients on DOACs showed a higher rate of thrombotic events during treatment (rate 1.84 and 0.50,respectively). Mortality rate was higher in patients on VKAs than in patients on DOACs (HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.46-0.91). In conclusion, we confirm the overall safety and effectiveness of anticoagulant treatment in very elderly AF patients, with lower mortality rates in DOACs patients, similar bleeding risk, and a higher risk for cerebral thrombotic events in DOACs patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Hypertension is a risk factor for both stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Data are sparse regarding the interaction between blood pressure and the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), 19,679 patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension were categorized according to average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The primary efficacy and safety end points were the time to the first stroke or systemic embolic event and the time to the first International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding event, respectively. Risk was calculated using Cox proportional hazards models based on average SBP and DBP and adjusting for 18 clinical characteristics. The efficacy and safety of a higher dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg) versus warfarin were evaluated with stratification by average SBP and DBP. Stroke/systemic embolic event occurred significantly more frequently in patients with elevated average SBP (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.50-2.70 for SBP ≥150 mm Hg relative to 130-139 mm Hg) or DBP (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.76-3.16 for DBP ≥90 mm Hg relative to 75-<85 mm Hg). The higher dose edoxaban regimen reduced stroke/systemic embolic event across the full range of SBP (P

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Logistic Models; Male; Patient Safety; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We tested the hypothesis that left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) interferes with the antithrombotic effects of dabigatran and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. This is a post-hoc analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) Study. We defined LVH by electrocardiography (ECG) and included patients with AF on the ECG tracing at entry. Hazard ratios (HR) for each dabigatran dose vs. warfarin were calculated in relation to LVH. LVH was present in 2353 (22.7%) out of 10 372 patients. In patients without LVH, the rates of primary outcome were 1.59%/year with warfarin, 1.60% with dabigatran 110 mg (HR vs. warfarin 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.36) and 1.08% with dabigatran 150 mg (HR vs. warfarin 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95). In patients with LVH, the rates of primary outcome were 3.21%/year with warfarin, 1.69% with dabigatran 110 mg (HR vs. warfarin 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84) and 1.55% with 150 mg (HR vs. warfarin 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.78). The interaction between LVH status and dabigatran 110 mg vs. warfarin was significant for the primary outcome (P = 0.021) and stroke (P = 0.016). LVH was associated with a higher event rate with warfarin, not with dabigatran. In the warfarin group, the time in therapeutic range was significantly lower in the presence than in the absence of LVH.. LVH was associated with a lower antithrombotic efficacy of warfarin, but not of dabigatran, in patients with AF. Consequently, the relative benefit of the lower dose of dabigatran compared to warfarin was enhanced in patients with LVH. The higher dose of dabigatran was superior to warfarin regardless of LVH status.. http:www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but must be balanced against the associated bleeding risk. Several risk scores have been proposed for prediction of bleeding events in patients with AF.. To compare the performance of contemporary clinical bleeding risk scores in 18 113 patients with AF randomized to dabigatran 110 mg, 150 mg or warfarin in the RE-LY trial.. HAS-BLED, ORBIT, ATRIA and HEMORR. Amongst the current clinical bleeding risk scores, the ORBIT score demonstrated the best discrimination and calibration. All the scores demonstrated, to a variable extent, an interaction with bleeding risk associated with dabigatran or warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

We assessed outcomes among anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of falling, and whether the benefits of apixaban vs warfarin are consistent in this population.. Of the 18,201 patients in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) study, 16,491 had information about history of falling-753 with history of falling and 15,738 without history of falling. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding.. When compared with patients without a history of falling, patients with a history of falling were older, more likely to be female and to have dementia, cerebrovascular disease, depression, diabetes, heart failure, osteoporosis, fractures, and higher CHA. Patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of falling receiving anticoagulation have a higher risk of major bleeding, including intracranial, and death. The efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent, irrespective of history of falling.

Topics: Accidental Falls; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of low-molecular weight heparin bridge therapy during warfarin interruption for elective surgery/procedures increases bleeding. Other predictors of bleeding in this setting are not well described.. BRIDGE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bridge therapy with dalteparin 100 IU/kg twice daily in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring warfarin interruption. Bleeding outcomes were documented from the time of warfarin interruption until up to 37 days postprocedure. Multiple logistic regression and time-dependent hazard models were used to identify major bleeding predictors.. We analyzed 1,813 patients of whom 895 received bridging and 918 received placebo. Median patient age was 72.6 years, and 73.3% were male. Forty-one major bleeding events occurred at a median time of 7.0 days (interquartile range, 4.0-18.0 days) postprocedure. Bridge therapy was a baseline predictor of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]=2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-4.8), as were a history of renal disease (OR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-6.0), and high-bleeding risk procedures (vs low-bleeding risk procedures) (OR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-5.9). Perioperative aspirin use (OR=3.6, 95% CI: 1.1-11.9) and postprocedure international normalized ratio >3.0 (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.1) were time-dependent predictors of major bleeding. Major bleeding was most common in the first 10 days compared with 11-37 days postprocedure (OR=3.5, 95% CI: 1.8-6.9).. In addition to bridge therapy, perioperative aspirin use, postprocedure international normalized ratio >3.0, a history of renal failure, and having a high-bleeding risk procedure increase the risk of major bleeding around the time of an elective surgery/procedure requiring warfarin interruption.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dalteparin; Double-Blind Method; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; North Carolina; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Stroke; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

To assess stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and other outcomes, and treatment effect of apixaban versus warfarin, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and different types of valvular heart disease (VHD), using data from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation trial.. There were 14 793 patients with known VHD status, categorised as having moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (n=3382), aortic regurgitation (AR) (n=842) or aortic stenosis (AS) (n=324); patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis were excluded from the trial. Baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between each type and no significant VHD. Treatment effect was assessed using an adjusted model.. Patients with MR or AR had similar rates of stroke/systemic embolism and bleeding compared with patients without MR or AR, respectively. Patients with AS had significantly higher event rates (presented as rate per 100 patient-years of follow-up) of stroke/systemic embolism (3.47 vs 1.36; adjusted HR (adjHR) 2.21, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.63), death (8.30 vs 3.53; adjHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.61), major bleeding (5.31 vs 2.53; adjHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.75) and intracranial bleeding (1.29 vs 0.51; adjHR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.96) than patients without AS. The superiority of apixaban over warfarin on stroke/systemic embolism was similar in patients with versus without MR (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.04 vs HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.00; interaction P value 0.52), with versus without AR (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.20 vs HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96; interaction P value 0.52), and with versus without AS (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.13 vs HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97; interaction P value 0.19). For each of the primary and secondary efficacy and safety outcomes, there was no evidence of a different effect of apixaban over warfarin in patients with any VHD subcategory.. In anticoagulated patients with AF, AS is associated with a higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism, bleeding and death. The efficacy and safety benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent, regardless of presence of MR, AR or AS.. ARISTOTLE clinical trial number NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of stroke 5-fold. Carotid artery disease (CD) also augments the risk of stroke, yet there are limited data about the interplay of these 2 diseases and clinical outcomes in patients with comorbid AF and CD.. Among patients with both AF and CD, use of rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin is associated with a lower risk of stroke.. This post hoc analysis from ROCKET AF aimed to determine absolute rates of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and bleeding, and the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with AF and CD (defined as history of carotid occlusive disease or carotid revascularization [endarterectomy and/or stenting]).. A total of 593 (4.2%) patients had CD at enrollment. Patients with and without CD had similar rates of stroke or SE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-1.48, P = 0.96), and there was no difference in major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.88-1.24, P = 0.62). The efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke/SE was not statistically significant in patients with vs those without CD (interaction P = 0.25). The safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin for major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was similar in patients with and without CD (interaction P = 0.64).. Patients with CD in ROCKET AF had similar risk of stroke/SE compared with patients without CD. Additionally, there was no interaction between CD and the treatment effect of rivaroxaban or warfarin for stroke prevention or safety endpoints.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Carotid Artery Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who interrupt anticoagulation are at high risk of thromboembolism and death.. Interruption of study drug was frequent in patients with AF and was associated with a substantial risk of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events over the ensuing 30 days. This risk was particularly high in patients who interrupted as a result of an adverse event; these patients deserve close monitoring and resumption of anticoagulation as soon as it is safe to do so.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

We assessed antiplatelet therapy use and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the ARISTOTLE trial.. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of PCI during follow-up (median 1.8 years); PCI details and outcomes post-PCI are reported. Of the 18,201 trial participants, 316 (1.7%) underwent PCI (152 in apixaban group, 164 in warfarin group).. PCI occurred infrequently during follow-up. Most patients on study drug at the time of PCI remained on study drug in the peri-PCI period; 19% continued the study drug without interruption. Antiplatelet therapy use post-PCI was variable, although most patients received DAPT. Additional data are needed to guide the use of antithrombotics in patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

The importance of time in therapeutic range (TTR) in patients prescribed warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be overemphasised.. To evaluate the impact of provision of TTR results during clinic visits on anticoagulation management.. Single-centred, randomised controlled study.. Fifteen arrhythmia clinics in Hong Kong.. AF patients prescribed warfarin.. Provision of TTR or no provision of TTR.. A documented discussion between doctors and patients about switching warfarin to a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC).. The provision of TTR among patients on warfarin was associated with a discussion about switching from warfarin to a NOAC in those with TTR <65%, but did not result in actual switching to a NOAC, suggesting additional barriers.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Health Services Research; Hong Kong; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to determine the net clinical benefit (NCB) of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. This was a retrospective analysis of 14,236 patients included in ROCKET AF who received at least one dose of study drug. We analyzed NCB using four different methods: (1) composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding; (2) method 1 with fatal or critical organ bleeding substituted for major bleeding; (3) difference between the rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism minus 1.5 times the difference between the rate of intracranial hemorrhage; and (4) weighted sum of differences between rates of death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding.. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism (rate difference per 10,000 patient-years [RD]=-86.8 [95% CI -143.6 to -30.0]) and fatal or critical organ bleeding (-41.3 [-68 to -14.7]). However, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding other than fatal or critical organ bleeding (55.9 [14.7 to 97.2]). Method 1 showed no difference between treatments (-35.5 [-108.4 to 37.3]). Methods 2-4 favored treatment with rivaroxaban (2: -96.8 [-157.0 to -36.8]; 3: -65.2 [-112.3 to -17.8]; 4: -54.8 [-96.0 to -10.2]).. Rivaroxaban was associated with favorable NCB compared with warfarin. The NCB was attributable to lower rates of ischemic events and fatal or critical organ bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Internationality; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study sought to assess whether there were significant interactions of procedural access strategies and lesion characteristics with bleeding and ischemic events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or warfarin following a percutaneous coronary intervention.. Among stented AF patients, the impact of procedural access strategies or lesion characteristics on antithrombotic safety and efficacy outcomes is unclear.. In the PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, 2,124 patients were randomized to 3 groups and followed for 12 months: 1) rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily plus a P2Y. Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban regimens consistently reduced clinically significant bleeding across subgroups of radial versus femoral arterial access and by vascular closure device use. Treatment effect of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events did not vary when stratified by ischemia-driven revascularization, urgency of revascularization, location of culprit artery, presence of bifurcation lesion, presence of thrombus, type, and length of stent or number of stents (interaction p > 0.05 for all subgroups).. Among stented AF patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation, there was no effect modification by procedure or lesion characteristics of either clinically significant bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events. Rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus DAPT in bleeding outcomes regardless of the type of stent or arterial access during the index coronary revascularization. (A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivaroxaban [JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939] and One of Oral Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PIONEER AF-PCI]; NCT01830543).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Internationality; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at an approximately 0.5% to 3% increased risk of thromboembolism during and immediately after catheter ablation. Treatment guidelines recommend periprocedural oral anticoagulation plus unfractionated heparin during ablation. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are the only non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for which there are randomized controlled trials assessing uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is noninferior vs warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism with less major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular AF. The ELIMINATE-AF (Evaluation of Edoxaban Compared With VKA in Subjects Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) study to assess the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for a dose reduction) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing catheter ablation (http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02942576). A total of 560 patients are planned for randomization to edoxaban or VKA (2:1 ratio) to obtain 450 patients fully compliant with the protocol. Patients will complete 21 to 28 days of anticoagulation prior to the ablation and a 90-day post-ablation period. The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding. The primary safety endpoint is major bleeding. A magnetic resonance imaging substudy will assess the incidence of silent cerebral lesions post-ablation. ELIMINATE-AF will define the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during catheter ablation of AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Catheter Ablation; Clinical Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Peri-operative management of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. To gain information on the peri-operative management of edoxaban, we compared outcomes in patients on warfarin or edoxaban enrolled in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 who underwent a surgery or invasive procedure.. Data from patients undergoing their first surgery/procedure were analysed and results compared by anticoagulant (warfarin vs. higher- or lower-dose edoxaban regimen [HDER and LDER, respectively]). Patients were classified by procedural management: anticoagulant interrupted (last dose 4-10 days pre-procedure) or anticoagulant continued (last dose ≤ 3 days pre-procedure). Stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding (MB), MB or clinically relevant non-MB (CRNMB) and death were assessed from 7 days pre- until 30 days post-procedure. The chi-square test was used to compare outcomes across treatment groups.. In patients requiring surgery/procedure in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, peri-operative rates of SSE, MB and death were not significantly different in patients who received edoxaban or warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death. High-sensitivity troponin T, growth differentiation factor-15, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and interleukin-6 levels are predictive of cardiovascular events and total cardiovascular death in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. The prognostic utility of these biomarkers for cause-specific death is unknown.. The ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation) randomized 18 201 patients with atrial fibrillation to apixaban or warfarin. Biomarkers were measured at randomization in 14 798 patients (1.9 years median follow-up). Cox models were used to identify clinical variables and biomarkers independently associated with each specific cause of death.. In total, 1272 patients died: 652 (51%) cardiovascular, 32 (3%) bleeding, and 588 (46%) noncardiovascular/nonbleeding deaths. Among cardiovascular deaths, 255 (39%) were sudden cardiac deaths, 168 (26%) heart failure deaths, and 106 (16%) stroke/systemic embolism deaths. Biomarkers were the strongest predictors of cause-specific death: a doubling of troponin T was most strongly associated with sudden death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; P<0.001), NT-proBNP with heart failure death (HR, 1.62; P<0.001), and growth differentiation factor-15 with bleeding death (HR, 1.72; P=0.028). Prior stroke/systemic embolism (HR, 2.58; P>0.001) followed by troponin T (HR, 1.45; P<0.0029) were the most predictive for stroke/ systemic embolism death. Adding all biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination for each cause-specific death.. Biomarkers were some of the strongest predictors of cause-specific death and may improve the ability to discriminate among patients' risks for different causes of death. These data suggest a potential role of biomarkers for the identification of patients at risk for different causes of death in patients anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Cause of Death; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Growth Differentiation Factor 15; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Interleukin-6; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Troponin T; Warfarin

We investigated the impact of polyvascular disease in patients enrolled in ROCKET AF.. Cox regression models were used to assess clinical outcomes and treatment effects of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary, peripheral, or carotid artery disease, or any combination of the 3.. A total of 655 (4.6%) patients had polyvascular disease (≥2 disease locations), and 3,391 (23.8%) had single-arterial bed disease. Patients with polyvascular disease had similar rates of stroke/systemic embolism but higher rates of cardiovascular and bleeding events when compared with those without vascular disease. Use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with higher rates of stroke in patients with polyvascular disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 95% CI 1.05-5.54); however, this was not seen in patients with single-bed (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.28) or no vascular disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.04; interaction P = .058). There was a significant interaction for major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding in patients with polyvascular (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.91-1.65) and single-bed vascular disease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.49) treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin when compared with those without vascular disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.04; interaction P = .0006). Additional antiplatelet therapy in this population did not improve stroke or cardiovascular outcomes.. The use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with a higher risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with polyvascular disease enrolled in ROCKET AF. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal management of this high-risk population.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Vascular Diseases; Warfarin

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who develop acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. The risk of bleeding is a major concern when oral anticoagulation is required to prevent stroke, and concomitant therapy with antiplatelet agents is required to minimize recurrent ischemic events.. AUGUSTUS is an international, multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design to compare apixaban with vitamin K antagonists and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF who develop ACS and/or undergo PCI and are receiving a P2Y12 inhibitor. Patients will be evaluated for eligibility during their ACS and/or PCI hospitalization. The primary outcome is the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. A key secondary outcome is the composite of all-cause death and all-cause hospitalization. Other secondary objectives are to evaluate ischemic outcomes including the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization, and all-cause hospitalization and each individual component. The aim is to enroll approximately 4,600 patients from around 500 sites in 33 countries.. AUGUSTUS will provide insight into the optimal oral antithrombotic therapy strategy for patients with AF and concomitant coronary artery disease. The unique 2 × 2 factorial design will delineate the bleeding effects of various anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies and generate evidence to guide the selection of the optimal antithrombotic regimen for this challenging group of patients. It is the largest and only prospective randomized trial to investigate in a blinded fashion the risk and benefits of aspirin on top of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and P2Y12 receptor inhibition.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There is limited information about the use of antithrombotic therapies and outcomes of Latin American (LatAm) subjects with atrial fibrillation. The global ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin over a median follow-up of 2.8 years.. The authors aimed to compare adjusted outcomes in Latin America versus outside Latin America and to compare outcomes stratified by anticoagulant treatment and region.. The authors analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes, adjusted for baseline characteristics, the Human Development Index, and randomized treatment of 2,661 LatAm versus 18,444 non-Latin American subjects (nLAS).. After multivariable adjustment, LatAm subjects with atrial fibrillation had higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage and death than nLAS. Outcomes with higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin were at least as favorable in LatAm subjects as in nLAS, with an even greater reduction in hemorrhagic stroke seen in LatAm.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Latin America; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with oral anticoagulants may be exposed to an increased risk of bleeding events. The HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INRs, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol) score is a simple, well-established, clinical bleeding-risk prediction score. Recently, a new algorithm-based score was proposed, the GARFIELD-AF (Global Anticoagulant in the Field-AF) bleeding score. We compared HAS-BLED and GARFIELD-AF scores in predicting adjudicated bleeding events in a clinical trial cohort of patients with AF taking anticoagulants, in the first external comparative validation of both scores. Methods and Results We analyzed patients from the SPORTIF (Stroke Prevention Using an Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in Patients With AF) III and V trials. All patients assigned to the warfarin arm with information to calculate the scores were considered. Outcomes were major, major/clinically relevant nonmajor, and any bleeding. A total of 3550 warfarin-treated patients were available for analysis. Of these patients, 2519 (71.0%) had a HAS-BLED score ≥3, whereas based on GARFIELD-AF median value, 2056 (57.9%) were categorized as "high score." Both HAS-BLED and GARFIELD-AF C-indexes showed modest predictive value (C-index [95% confidence interval] for major bleeding, 0.58 [0.56-0.60] and 0.56 [0.54-0.57], respectively); however, GARFIELD-AF was not predictive of any bleeding. The GARFIELD-AF bleeding score had a significantly lower sensitivity and a negative reclassification for any bleeding compared with HAS-BLED, assessed by integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement (both P<0.001). HAS-BLED showed a 5% net benefit for any bleeding occurrence. Conclusions The algorithm-based GARFIELD-AF bleeding score did not show any significant improvement in major and major/clinically relevant nonmajor prediction compared with the simple HAS-BLED score. For clinical usefulness in prediction of any bleeding, the HAS-BLED score showed a significant net benefit compared with the GARFIELD-AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Black and Hispanic patients are less likely than white patients to use oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation.. To assess racial/ethnic differences in the use of oral anticoagulants, particularly DOACs, in patients with atrial fibrillation.. This cohort study used data from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II, a prospective, US-based registry of outpatients with nontransient atrial fibrillation 21 years and older who were followed up from February 2013 to July 2016. Data were analyzed from February 2017 to February 2018.. Self-reported race/ethnicity as white, black, or Hispanic.. The primary outcome was use of any oral anticoagulant, particularly DOACs. Secondary outcomes included the quality of anticoagulation received and oral anticoagulant discontinuation at 1 year.. Of 12 417 patients, 11 100 were white individuals (88.6%), 646 were black individuals (5.2%), and 671 were Hispanic individuals (5.4%) with atrial fibrillation. After adjusting for clinical features, black individuals were less likely to receive any oral anticoagulant than white individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56, 0.99]) and less likely to receive DOACs if an anticoagulant was prescribed (aOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.83]). After further controlling for socioeconomic factors, oral anticoagulant use was no longer significantly different in black individuals (aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.04]); among patients using oral anticoagulants, DOAC use remained significantly lower in black individuals (aOR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.95]). There was no significant difference between white and Hispanic groups in use of oral anticoagulants. Among patients receiving warfarin, the median time in therapeutic range was lower in black individuals (57.1% [IQR, 39.9%-72.5%]) and Hispanic individuals (51.7% [interquartile range {IQR}, 39.1%-66.7%]) than white individuals (67.1% [IQR, 51.8%-80.6%]; P < .001). Black and Hispanic individuals treated with DOACs were more likely to receive inappropriate dosing than white individuals (black patients, 61 of 394 [15.5%]; Hispanic patients, 74 of 409 [18.1%]; white patients, 1003 of 7988 [12.6%]; P = .01). One-year persistence on oral anticoagulants was the same across groups.. After controlling for clinical and socioeconomic factors, black individuals were less likely than white individuals to receive DOACs for atrial fibrillation, with no difference between white and Hispanic groups. When atrial fibrillation was treated, the quality of anticoagulant use was lower in black and Hispanic individuals. Identifying modifiable causes of these disparities could improve the quality of care in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electrocardiography; Ethnicity; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Racial Groups; Registries; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is typically performed with uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin or interrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy. Uninterrupted anticoagulation with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, such as dabigatran, may be safer; however, controlled data are lacking. We investigated the safety of uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation.. In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial with blinded adjudicated end-point assessments, we randomly assigned patients scheduled for catheter ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to receive either dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) or warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0). Ablation was performed after 4 to 8 weeks of uninterrupted anticoagulation, which was continued during and for 8 weeks after ablation. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding events during and up to 8 weeks after ablation; secondary end points included thromboembolic and other bleeding events.. The trial enrolled 704 patients across 104 sites; 635 patients underwent ablation. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. The incidence of major bleeding events during and up to 8 weeks after ablation was lower with dabigatran than with warfarin (5 patients [1.6%] vs. 22 patients [6.9%]; absolute risk difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -8.4 to -2.2; P<0.001). Dabigatran was associated with fewer periprocedural pericardial tamponades and groin hematomas than warfarin. The two treatment groups had a similar incidence of minor bleeding events. One thromboembolic event occurred in the warfarin group.. In patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation with uninterrupted dabigatran was associated with fewer bleeding complications than uninterrupted warfarin. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; RE-CIRCUIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02348723 .).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective at preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the management of bleeding in contemporary, clinical use of NOACs. We aimed to assess the frequency, management, and outcomes of major bleeding in the setting of community use of NOACs. Using the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II registry, we analyzed rates of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding and subsequent outcomes in patients treated with NOACs versus warfarin. Outcomes of interest included acute and chronic bleeding management, recurrent bleeding, thromboembolic events, and death. In total, 344 patients with atrial fibrillation experienced major bleeding events over a median follow-up of 360 days follow-up: n = 273 on NOAC (3.3 per 100 patient-years) and n = 71 on warfarin (3.5 per 100 patient-years). Intracranial bleeding was uncommon but similar (0.34 per 100 patient-years for NOAC vs 0.44 for warfarin, p = 0.5), as was gastrointestinal bleeding (1.8 for NOAC vs 1.3 for warfarin, p = 0.1). Blood products and correction agents were less commonly used in NOAC patients with major bleeds compared with warfarin-treated patients (53% vs 76%, p = 0.0004 for blood products; 0% vs 1.5% for recombinant factor; p = 0.0499); no patients received pharmacologic hemostatic agents (aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, desmopressin, aprotinin). Within 30 days, 23 NOAC-treated patients (8.4%) died versus 5 (7.0%) on warfarin (p = 0.7). At follow-up, 126 NOAC-treated (46%) and 29 warfarin-treated patients (41%) were not receiving any anticoagulation. In conclusion, rates of major bleeding are similar in warfarin and NOAC-treated patients in clinical practice. However, NOAC-related bleeds require less blood product administration and rarely require factor replacement.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Component Transfusion; Disease Management; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Hemostatic Techniques; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prognosis; Registries; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

A significant proportion of patients treated with warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) become warfarin ineligible (WI) due to major bleeding events (MBE) or systemic thromboembolism (STE). We report a large multicenter real-world experience of the use of direct oral antagonists (DOACs) in these WI patients.. We report the outcomes of 263 WI patients treated with DOACs. The primary objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes of STE and MBE with DOACs. Secondary objective was to assess clinical predictors of repeat MBE and STE on DOACs.. Note that 63% (166 of 263) patients had a repeat MBE on DOACs. Repeat MBE was significantly higher in patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding (74.5% vs. 30%, P < 0.0001). Five percent (12 of 263) developed repeat STE. Higher mean CHA2DS2VASC (6.5 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.6 = 0.001) score was associated with repeat STE. About 34% (57 of 166) of patients had an intervention to manage repeat MBE. LAAO devices were successfully used in 67% (12 of 18) high-risk patients who underwent major interventions to manage MBE.. In WI patients rechallenged with DOACs, a significant proportion developed repeat MBE. LAAO devices seem reasonable in those patients who undergo major interventions to manage MBE with cautious and temporary continuation of DOAC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Substitution; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Failure; Warfarin

No previous studies exist investigating the optimal intensity of uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly.. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous low-intensity warfarin therapy throughout the periprocedural period of RFCA for AF in the elderly.. This is a prospective randomized study. We enrolled AF patients (age ≥ 70 years) who underwent first-time RFCA for AF. Enrolled patients were randomized to group A and group B. The international normalized ratios before ablation were maintained at 1.5 to 2.0 and 2.0 to 2.5 in group A and B, respectively. Primary end points were periprocedural thromboembolic complications and major bleeding. Secondary end points included periprocedural asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE) and minor bleeding.. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in our study (group A: 52; group B: 49). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Only 1 patient suffered from stroke in group B. No major bleeding events occurred in either group. The incidence of new ACE lesions was comparable between the 2 groups (11.5% vs 8.2%, P = 0.82). Minor bleeding occurred in 1 of 52 (1.9%) patients in group A and in 5 of 49 (10.2%) patients in group B ( P = 0.10).. Uninterrupted low-intensity warfarin for RFCA of AF might be as effective as standard-intensity warfarin in preventing periprocedural thromboembolic complications and might be associated with fewer bleeding events in the elderly.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Safety; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin is a commonly used anticoagulant. Whether a given dose of the different formulations of Brazilian warfarin will result in the same effect on the international normalized ratio (INR) is uncertain. The aim of the WARFA trial is to determine whether the branded and two generic warfarins available in Brazil differ in their effect on the INR.. WARFA is a cross-over RCT comparing three warfarins. The formulations tested are the branded Marevan® (Uniao Quimica/Farmoquimica) and two generic warfarin (manufactured respectively by Uniao Quimica Farmaceutica Nacional and Laboratorio Teuto Brasileiro). All of them were manufactured in Brazil, are available in all settings of the Brazilian healthcare system and were purchased from retail drugstores. Eligible participants had atrial fibrillation or flutter, had been using warfarin for at least 2 months with a therapeutic range of 2.0-3.0 and had low variability in INR results during the 1st period of the trial. Our primary outcome, for which we have an equality hypothesis, is the difference between warfarins in the mean absolute difference between two INR results, obtained after three and 4 weeks with each drug. Our secondary outcomes, that will be tested for inequality (except for the mean INR, which will be tested for equality), include the difference in the warfarin dose, and time in therapeutic range. Clinical events and adherence were also recorded and will be reported.. To our knowledge, WARFA will be the first comparison of the more readily applicable INR results between branded and generic warfarins in Brazil. WARFA is important because warfarins are commonly switched between in the course of a chronic treatment in Brazil. Final results of WARFA are expected in May 2017.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02017197 . Registered 11 December 2013.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Blood Coagulation; Brazil; Clinical Protocols; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Compounding; Drug Monitoring; Drugs, Generic; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Medication Adherence; Research Design; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Thromboembolic cerebrovascular accident remains a rare but potentially devastating complication of catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin has become the standard of care when performing catheter-based AF ablation. Compared with warfarin, apixaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke and major bleeding in nonvalvular AF. With an increase in apixaban use for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF, there is an increased interest in the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted apixaban therapy during AF ablation. We compared the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted OA therapy with either warfarin or apixaban in all patients who underwent catheter-based AF ablation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and at Augusta University Medical Center from January 7, 2013, to February 25, 2016. All patients underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram on the day of their ablation to assess for the presence of intracardiac thrombi. All complications were identified and classified as bleeding, thromboembolic events, or other. A total of 627 patients were analyzed as described earlier. There were 310 patients in the warfarin group and 317 patients in the apixaban group. There were 8 complications in the warfarin group and 5 complications in the apixaban group (p = 0.38). There were no thromboembolic complications in either group. In conclusion, the use of apixaban is as safe and effective as warfarin for uninterrupted OA therapy during catheter-based ablation of AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intraoperative Period; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in patients receiving warfarin is well studied, limited data are available on the use of oral factor Xa inhibitors in this setting.. Using data from Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) (n=14 264), we compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to rivaroxaban versus warfarin who did and did not undergo CIED implantation or revision. In this post-hoc, postrandomization, on-treatment analysis, only the first intervention per patient was analyzed. During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 453 patients (242 rivaroxaban group; 211 warfarin group) underwent de novo CIED implantation (64.2%) or revision procedures (35.8%). Patients who received CIEDs were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have past myocardial infarction, but had similar stroke risk compared to patients who did not receive CIEDs. Most patients who received a device had study drug interrupted for the procedure and did not receive bridging anticoagulation. During the 30-day postprocedural period, 11 patients (4.55%) in the rivaroxaban group experienced bleeding complications compared with 15 (7.13%) in the warfarin group. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 3 patients (1.26%) in the rivaroxaban group and 1 (0.48%) in the warfarin group. Event rates were too low for formal hypothesis testing.. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were low in both rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients. Periprocedural use of oral factor Xa inhibitors in CIED implantation requires further study in prospective, randomized trials.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Defibrillators, Implantable; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) alternatives to warfarin are available for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to describe the factors associated with selection of NOACs versus warfarin in patients with new onset AF.. The ORBIT-AF II study is a national, US, prospective, observational, cohort study of anticoagulation treatment in patients with AF receiving NOACs or warfarin in the United States from 2013 to 2016. We measured factors associated with oral anticoagulant selection in 4,670 patients recently diagnosed with AF.. At baseline, 1,169 (25%) patients were started on warfarin and 3,501 (75%) on NOACs: of these latter, 259 (6%) were started on dabigatran, 1858 (40%) on rivaroxaban, and 1384 (30%) on apixaban. Those receiving NOACs were slightly younger patients (median age 71 vs 72, P<.0001); were less likely to have prior stroke (5.3% vs 8.6%; P<.0001) or prior bleeding (2.7% vs 4.4%; P=.005); had better kidney function (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 91 mL/min vs 80 mL/min, P<.0001); and had fewer patients at high stroke risk (CHA. In contemporary clinical practice, up to three-fourths of patients with new-onset AF are now initially treated with a NOAC for stroke prevention. Those selected for NOAC treatment had lower stroke and bleeding risk profiles, were more likely treated by cardiologists, and had higher socioeconomic status.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01701817.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diltiazem; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Verapamil; Warfarin

The impact of different types of extracranial bleeding events on health-related quality of life and health-state utility among patients with atrial fibrillation is not well understood.. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) Trial compared edoxaban with warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Data from the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, prospectively collected at 3-month intervals for up to 48 months, were used to estimate the impact of different categories of bleeding events on health-state utility over 12 months following the event. Longitudinal mixed-effect models revealed that major gastrointestinal bleeds and major nongastrointestinal bleeds were associated with significant immediate decreases in utility scores (-0.029 [-0.044 to -0.014;. All categories of bleeding events were associated with negative impacts on health-state utility in patients with atrial fibrillation. Major bleeds were associated with relatively large immediate decreases in utility scores that gradually diminished over 12 months; clinically relevant nonmajor and minor bleeds were associated with smaller immediate decreases in utility that persisted over 12 months.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Health Status; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking rivaroxaban has not been well established. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who received thrombolytic therapy in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). A review of medical and adverse event records for patients receiving thrombolytic therapy while enrolled in ROCKET AF was performed to determine their baseline characteristics, indications for thrombolysis, and type of agent used. Safety end points were 30-day post-thrombolytic rates of stroke, bleeding, and mortality. A total of 28 patients in ROCKET AF received thrombolytic therapy, with 19 patients on rivaroxaban and 9 patients on warfarin. Ischemic stroke was the most common indication for thrombolysis (n = 10), and alteplase was the most commonly used fibrinolytic agent (n = 14). Of the 19 patients in the rivaroxaban group, there were 2 nonfatal bleeding events and 2 deaths, mostly occurring when thrombolytic therapy was administered within 48 hours of the last rivaroxaban dose. Of the 9 patients in the warfarin group, there was 1 nonfatal bleeding event and 3 deaths, most occurring when thrombolytic therapy was administered outside of 48 hours from the last warfarin dose. In conclusion, these observations suggest that careful assessment of the time since the last dose may be of clinical significance in patients on novel oral anticoagulants who require emergent thrombolysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In atrial fibrillation (AF)-related acute ischemic stroke, the optimal oral anticoagulation strategy remains unclear.. To test whether rivaroxaban or warfarin sodium is safer and more effective for preventing early recurrent stroke in patients with AF-related acute ischemic stroke.. A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point evaluation, comparative phase 2 trial was conducted from April 28, 2014, to December 7, 2015, at 14 academic medical centers in South Korea among patients with mild AF-related stroke within the previous 5 days who were deemed suitable for early anticoagulation. Analysis was performed on a modified intent-to-treat basis.. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive rivaroxaban, 10 mg/d for 5 days followed by 15 or 20 mg/d, or warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0, for 4 weeks.. The primary end point was the composite of new ischemic lesion or new intracranial hemorrhage seen on results of magnetic resonance imaging at 4 weeks. Primary analysis was performed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study medications and completed follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Key secondary end points were individual components of the primary end point and hospitalization length.. Of 195 patients randomized, 183 individuals (76 women and 107 men; mean [SD] age, 70.4 [10.4] years) completed magnetic resonance imaging follow-up and were included in the primary end point analysis. The rivaroxaban group (n = 95) and warfarin group (n = 88) showed no differences in the primary end point (47 [49.5%] vs 48 [54.5%]; relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.20; P = .49) or its individual components (new ischemic lesion: 28 [29.5%] vs 31 of 87 [35.6%]; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.26; P = .38; new intracranial hemorrhage: 30 [31.6%] vs 25 of 87 [28.7%]; relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.71; P = .68). Each group had 1 clinical ischemic stroke, and all new intracranial hemorrhages were asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformations. Hospitalization length was reduced with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin (median, 4.0 days [interquartile range, 2.0-6.0 days] vs 6.0 days [interquartile range, 4.0-8.0]; P < .001).. In mild AF-related acute ischemic stroke, rivaroxaban and warfarin had comparable safety and efficacy.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02042534.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Few data exist on the long-term outcomes of patients with spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus, and complex aortic plaque (CAP), in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulation. We explored the relationship between these 3 echocardiographic findings and clinical outcomes, and the comparative efficacy and safety of apixaban and warfarin for each finding.. Patients from the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) with SEC, LA/LAA thrombus, or CAP diagnosed by either transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography were compared with patients with none of these findings on transesophageal echocardiography.. A total of 1251 patients were included: 217 had SEC, 127 had LA/LAA thrombus, 241 had CAP, and 746 had none. The rates of stroke/systemic embolism were not significantly different among patients with and without these echocardiographic findings (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-3.60 for SEC; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-6.86 for LA/LAA thrombus; hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-6.85 for CAP). Rates of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were also not different between patients with and without these findings. For patients with either SEC or CAP, there was no evidence of a differential effect of apixaban over warfarin. For patients with LA/LAA thrombus, there was also no significant interaction, with the exception of all-cause death and any bleeding where there was a greater benefit of apixaban compared with warfarin among patients with no LA/LAA thrombus.. In anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke, echocardiographic findings do not seem to add to the risk of thromboembolic events.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban-a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)- 60-mg and 30-mg once-daily dose regimens are noninferior versus well-managed warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) with less major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are no published data from phase 3 clinical trials specifically evaluating the use of NOACs in elderly NVAF patients, especially those considered ineligible for available oral anticoagulants. The Edoxaban Low-Dose for EldeR CARE AF patients (ELDERCARE-AF) study is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study that will compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 15 mg versus placebo in Japanese patients with NVAF ≥80 years of age who are considered ineligible for standard oral anticoagulant therapy. A total of 800 patients (400 in each treatment group) are planned for randomization (1:1) to either edoxaban or placebo using a stratified randomization method with CHADS

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Pyridines; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation agents can be caused by occult malignancies. We investigated the proportions and features of major GI bleeding (MGIB) events related to occult GI cancers in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.. We analyzed data from the Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy study (conducted between December 2005 and March 2009 in 951 clinical centers in 44 countries worldwide), which compared the abilities of dabigatran vs warfarin to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in 18,113 patients with atrial fibrillation. Two blinded gastroenterologists independently reviewed source documents of MGIB events (n = 595) that occurred during the study period. We collected data on MGIB events caused by previously unidentified GI malignancies, and compared characteristics of MGIB events in patients who received dabigatran vs warfarin (primary end point), and in patients with bleeding from cancer, vs patients bleeding from a nonmalignant or unidentified source.. Of 546 unique MGIB events, 44 (8.1%) were found to be from GI cancers (34 of 398 MGIB events in dabigatran users and 10 of 148 MGIB events in warfarin users; P = .60). Colorectal cancer accounted for 35 of 44 of all cancers identified. There were more colorectal cancer-associated MGIB events in the dabigatran group (30 of 34) than in the warfarin group (5 of 10) (P = .02), but more gastric cancer-associated MGIB events in the warfarin group (5 of 10) than in the dabigatran group (1 of 34) (P = .001). There were no differences in the short-term outcomes of cancer-related MGIB events in the dabigatran vs the warfarin group, but 75% of all cancer-related MGIB events required at least 1 blood transfusion and the mean hospital stay was 10.1 days. Compared with MGIB events from a nonmalignant or unidentified source, MGIB from cancer occurred sooner (343.0 vs 223.1 d; P = .003), but the bleeding was more likely to be chronic (for >7 d) (27.3% vs 63.6%; P < .001).. In evaluating data from a study of the effects of anticoagulation therapy, we found approximately 1 of every 12 MGIB events to be related to an occult cancer. Approximately two thirds of cancer-related MGIB presents with chronic bleeding, and morbidity, and resource utilization is high.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemoprevention; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

We describe the incidence, location and management of non-major bleeding, and assess the association between non-major bleeding and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving anticoagulation therapy enrolled in Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE).. We included patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug (n=18 140). Non-major bleeding was defined as the first bleeding event considered to be clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) or minor bleeding, and not preceded by a major bleeding event.. Non-major bleeding was three times more common than major bleeding (12.1% vs 3.8%). Like major bleeding, non-major bleeding was less frequent with apixaban (6.4 per 100 patient-years) than warfarin (9.4 per 100 patient-years) (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75). The most frequent sites of non-major bleeding were haematuria (16.4%), epistaxis (14.8%), gastrointestinal (13.3%), haematoma (11.5%) and bruising/ecchymosis (10.1%). Medical or surgical intervention was similar among patients with non-major bleeding on warfarin versus apixaban (24.7% vs 24.5%). A change in antithrombotic therapy (58.6% vs 50.0%) and permanent study drug discontinuation (5.1% (61) vs 3.6% (30), p=0.10) was numerically higher with warfarin than apixaban. CRNM bleeding was independently associated with an increased risk of overall death (adjusted HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.18) and subsequent major bleeding (adjusted HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.04).. In ARISTOTLE, non-major bleeding was common and substantially less frequent with apixaban than with warfarin. CRNM bleeding was independently associated with a higher risk of death and subsequent major bleeding. Our results highlight the importance of any severity of bleeding in patients with AF treated with anticoagulation therapy and suggest that non-major bleeding, including minor bleeding, might not be minor.. NCT00412984; post-results.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Substitution; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Evidence supporting use of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) is based mainly on data from patients with permanent, persistent, or paroxysmal AF. Less is known about the risk following a new diagnosis of AF and the efficacy and safety of apixaban in these patients.. Using data from ARISTOTLE, we assessed the relationship between timing of AF diagnosis and clinical outcomes and the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in these patients. Recently diagnosed AF was defined as a new diagnosis of AF within 30days prior to enrollment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between recently diagnosed AF and clinical outcomes. We also assessed the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin according to time since AF diagnosis.. In ARISTOTLE, 1899 (10.5%) patients had recently diagnosed AF. After adjustment, patients with recently versus remotely diagnosed AF had a similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR=1.07, 95% CI=0.80-1.42; p=0.67), but higher mortality was seen in patients with recently diagnosed AF (adjusted HR=1.21, 95% CI=1.02-1.43; p=0.03). The beneficial effects of apixaban, compared with warfarin, on clinical outcomes were consistent, irrespective of timing of AF diagnosis (all interaction p-values >0.12).. Patients with recently diagnosed AF had a similar risk of stroke but higher mortality than patients with remotely diagnosed AF, suggesting that they are not at "low risk" and warrant stroke prevention strategies. The benefits of apixaban over warfarin were preserved, irrespective of timing of AF diagnosis.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The choice between initiating a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be challenging. To assist in this decision, we developed a risk score to identify patients for whom a therapeutic benefit of NOACs over VKA is predicted.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized clinical trial of edoxaban vs. warfarin in 21 105 patients with AF. Cox proportional hazard models identified factors associated with a serious net clinical outcome (NCO) of disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding, and all-cause mortality in VKA naïve patients from the warfarin arm. These were used to develop an integer risk score. Performance was assessed by C-indices and validation by bootstrapping. Kaplan-Meier analyses were stratified by three score categories and treatment arm. Over a median of 2.7 years, 457 NCO events occurred in 2898 patients with a total person-time of 7549.5 years (6.05%/year). The risk prediction model (C = 0.693) for the NCO was translated into a 17-point integer score, with annualized event rates for the low, intermediate, and high-risk categories in the warfarin arm of 3.5%, 9.9%, and 20.8%, respectively. Therapeutic benefit of higher- and lower-dose edoxaban over warfarin was demonstrated in the high- and intermediate-risk, with equal benefit in the low-risk categories (P-interaction 0.008 and 0.014, respectively).. In VKA naive patients with AF, the TIMI-AF score can assist in the prediction of a poor composite outcome and guide selection of anticoagulant therapy by identifying a differential clinical benefit with a NOAC or VKA.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) modifies the risk/benefit of anticoagulation is controversial. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events and significantly reduced bleeding and cardiovascular mortality. However, detailed analyses by AF pattern have not been reported.. The 21 105 patients were categorized as having paroxysmal (<7 days duration), persistent (≥7 days but <1 year), or permanent (≥1 year or failed cardioversion) AF patterns at randomization. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated during the 2.8 years median follow-up and compared by AF pattern. The primary end point of stroke/systemic embolic event was lower in those patients with paroxysmal AF (1.49%/year), compared with persistent (1.83%/year; P-adj =0.015) and permanent AF (1.95%/year; P-adj =0.004). Overall, all-cause mortality also was lower with paroxysmal (3.0%/year) compared with persistent (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001) and permanent AF (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001). Annualized major bleeding rates were similar across AF patterns (2.86% versus 2.65% versus 2.73%). There was no effect modification by treatment assignment.. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with paroxysmal AF suffered fewer thromboembolic events and deaths compared with those with persistent and permanent AF. The efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban as compared with warfarin was consistent across the 3 patterns of AF.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The review shows the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), depending on the severity of the disease. Patients with non-valvular AF and CKD have a significantly increased risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic complications, and death from all causes. Evaluation of the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyzes of RCTs demonstrated the advantages of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, compared with warfarin in reducing the risk of bleeding in patients with AF and CKD in predialysis stage. According to experimental and clinical studies, warfarin can promote renal vascular calcification. With the deterioration of filtration renal function during treatment with anticoagulants in patients with AF on the results of ROCKET AF study found that rivaroxaban is more preferable than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. The absence of RCT data complicates the choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CKD on hemodialysis, although the NOAC approved by the Office of Quality Control Food and Drug US drugs (FDA) for the use of patients in this category. According to the instruction drugs rivaroxaban and apixaban are allowed to use in patients with end-stage CKD with creatinine clearance not less than 15 ml/min.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) instead of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coexisting valvular heart disease (VHD) is of substantial interest.. This study explored outcomes in patients with AF with and without VHD in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial, comparing edoxaban with warfarin.. Valvular heart disease was defined as history or baseline echocardiography evidence of at least moderate aortic/mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, or prior valve surgery (bioprosthesis replacement, valve repair, valvuloplasty). Patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves were excluded from the trial. Comparisons were made of rates of stroke/systemic embolic event (SSEE), major bleeding, additional efficacy and safety outcomes, as well as net clinical outcomes, in patients with or without VHD treated with edoxaban or warfarin, using adjusted Cox proportional hazards.. After adjustment for multiple baseline characteristics, compared with no-VHD patients (n = 18,222), VHD patients (n = 2,824) had a similar rate of SSEE but higher rates of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.26 to 1.56; p <0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.43; p <0.001), and major bleeding (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.42; p = 0.02). Higher-dose edoxaban regimen had efficacy similar to warfarin in the presence of VHD (for SSEE, HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.07, in patients with VHD, and HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.07, in patients without VHD; p interaction [p. The presence of VHD increased the risk of death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and major bleeding but did not affect the relative efficacy or safety of higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin in AF. (Global Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban (DU-176b) vs. Standard Practice of Dosing With Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48]; NCT00781391).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Safety issues have been raised about dabigatran. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of safety outcomes in patients who had atrial fibrillation and a risk of stroke. We analyzed 439 patients prescribed dabigatran (n = 220) or warfarin (n = 219). Ischemic stroke occurred in 15 (6.8%) patients in the warfarin group versus 5 (5.2%) patients in the 110-mg group versus 1 (0.8%) patient in the 150-mg dabigatran group (P = .015). Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 6 (2.7%) patients in the warfarin group versus 3 (2.4%) patients in the 150-mg dabigatran group (P = .104). Death from any cause occurred in 10 (4.6%) patients in the warfarin group versus 1 (1.0%) patient in the 110-mg dabigatran group (P = .005). Dabigatran was associated with less ischemic stroke and death from any cause than warfarin. Dabigatran may be a better option for stroke prophylaxis, where recommended monitoring with warfarin is suboptimal.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Turkey; Warfarin

Comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with cardiovascular disease. The risks of stroke and mortality associated with COPD among patients with atrial fibrillation are not well understood.. We analyzed patients from ARISTOTLE, a randomized trial of 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation comparing the effects of apixaban versus warfarin on the risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed the associations between comorbid COPD and risk of stroke or systemic embolism and of mortality, adjusting for treatment allocation, smoking history and other risk factors.. COPD was present in 1950 (10.8%) of 18,134 patients with data on pulmonary disease history. After multivariable adjustment, COPD was not associated with risk of stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.60, 1.21], p=0.356). However, COPD was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.36, 1.88], p<0.001) and both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. The benefit of apixaban over warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism was consistent among patients with and without COPD (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.52, 1.63] versus 0.78 [95% CI 0.65, 0.95], interaction p=0.617).. COPD was independently associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation, but was not associated with risk of stroke or systemic embolism. The effect of apixaban on stroke or systemic embolism in COPD patients was consistent with its effect in the overall trial population.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We compared patient-reported treatment satisfaction and the economic impact of anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion procedures.. The current study is a post hoc analysis of the prospective, multicentre X-VeRT (EXplore the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral riVaroxaban for the prevention of caRdiovascular events in subjects with non-valvular aTrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion) trial. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II in seven countries (US, UK, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands). An economic model was also developed to estimate the impact of postponed cardioversions for two countries (UK and Italy). This model estimated the total costs of cardioversion, taking into consideration the costs for drug therapy (including extended treatment duration due to cardioversion postponement), international normalized ratio monitoring of VKAs, the cardioversion procedure, and rescheduling the procedure. These costs were linked to the respective X-VeRT study data to estimate the total costs. Patients receiving rivaroxaban in the delayed cardioversion group had significantly higher scores for Convenience, Effectiveness, and Global satisfaction (81.74 vs. 65.78; 39.41 vs. 32.95; and 82.07 vs. 66.74, respectively; P < 0.0001). Based on the total patient population included in the treatment satisfaction substudy (n = 632) in the delayed cardioversion group in X-VeRT, the use of rivaroxaban was estimated to result in a saving of £421 and €360 per patient in UK and Italian settings, respectively.. The use of rivaroxaban in the setting of cardioversion resulted in greater patient satisfaction and cost savings, compared with that of VKA.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Budgets; Canada; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Electric Countershock; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with systolic heart failure (HF) are at increased risk of both ischemic stroke and death. Currently, no risk scores are available to identify HF patients at high risk of stroke or death. The Warfarin vs. Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction (WARCEF) trial studied 2305 HF patients, in sinus rhythm, followed for up to 6 years (3.5±1.5 years). This trial showed no overall difference in those treated with warfarin vs aspirin with regard to death or stroke. The present study develops the first prognostic model to identify patients at higher risk of stroke or death based on their overall risk profile.. A scoring algorithm using 8 readily obtainable clinical characteristics as predictors, age, gender, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, ejection fraction, diastolic blood pressure, diabetes status, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (C-index=0.65, 95% CI: 0.613-0.681), was developed. It was validated internally using a bootstrap method. In predicting 1-year survival for death alone, our 8-predictor model had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.579-0.678) while the 14-predictor Seattle model had an AUC of 0.72. The Seattle model did not report stroke.. This novel prognostic model predicts the overall risk of ischemic stroke or death for HF patients. This model compares favorably for death with the Seattle model and has the added utility of including stroke as an endpoint. Use of this model will help identify those patients in need of more intensive monitoring and therapy and may help identify appropriate populations for trials of new therapies.. http://www.Clinicatrials.govNCT00041938.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Area Under Curve; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Obesity has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk in atrial fibrillation, but little is known in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.. Post hoc analysis of data from the AMADEUS (Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. We studied 1588 elderly patients, who were categorized as normal body mass index (BMI, 18.5-25 kg/m(2); n=515 [32.4%]), overweight (BMI, 25-30 kg/m(2); n=711 [44.8%]), and obese (BMI≥30 kg/m(2); n=362 [22.8%]). There was a significant reduction in the composite outcome of cardiovascular death and stroke/systemic embolism with increasing BMI category, being 5.0%, 3.2%, and 1.5% per 100 patient-years, respectively (P for trend=0.01). Cox proportional hazards analysis found obesity to be associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.77; P=0.01). In the warfarin arm (n=814), multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that obesity was independently related to higher odds of time in therapeutic range ≥60% (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.80; P=0.004).. Obesity was associated with a lower stroke and mortality rate in elderly anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients. Obesity was related to good quality anticoagulation control.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Case-Control Studies; Comorbidity; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Obesity; Oligosaccharides; Overweight; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often take multiple medications.. We examined characteristics and compared adjusted outcomes between rivaroxaban and warfarin according to number of concomitant baseline medications and the presence of combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study. At baseline, 5101 patients (36%) were on 0 to 4 medications, 7298 (51%) were on 5 to 9, and 1865 (13%) were on ≥ 10. Although polypharmacy was not associated with higher risk of stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.38), it was associated with higher risks of the combined end point of stroke, non-central nervous system embolism, vascular death, or myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.68) and nonmajor clinically relevant or major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.65). There was no significant difference in primary efficacy (adjusted interaction P=0.99) or safety outcomes (adjusted interaction P=0.87) between treatment groups by number of medications. Patients treated with 0 to 4 medications had lower rates of major bleeding with rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.95; interaction P=0.0074). There was no evidence of differential outcomes in those treated with ≥ 1 combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors.. In a population of patients with atrial fibrillation, two thirds were on ≥ 5 medications. Increasing medication use was associated with higher risk of bleeding but not stroke. Rivaroxaban was tolerated across complex patients on multiple medications.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Stroke can be a life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Uninterrupted warfarin treatment contributes to minimizing the risk of stroke complications.. This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter study assessing the safety and efficacy of apixaban for the prevention of cerebral thromboembolism complicating AF catheter ablation. Two hundred patients with drug-resistant AF were equally assigned to take either apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg twice daily) or warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2-3) for at least 1 month before AF ablation. Neither drug regimen was interrupted throughout the operative period. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed for all patients to detect silent cerebral infarction (SCI) after the ablation. Primary outcomes were defined as the occurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, SCI, or major bleeding that required intervention. The secondary outcome was minor bleeding. The groups did not statistically differ in patients' backgrounds or procedural parameters. During AF ablation, the apixaban group required administration of more heparin to maintain an activated clotting time > 300 seconds than the warfarin group (apixaban, 14,000 ± 4,000 units; warfarin, 9,000 ± 3,000 units). Three primary outcome events occurred in each group (apixaban, 2 SCI and 1 major bleed; warfarin, 3 SCI, P = 1.00), and 3 and 4 secondary outcome events occurred in the apixaban and warfarin groups (P = 0.70), respectively.. Apixaban has similar safety and effectiveness to warfarin for the prevention of cerebral thromboembolism during the periprocedural period of AF ablation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Brain Ischemia; Catheter Ablation; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Embolism; Intracranial Thrombosis; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Warfarin

Coagulation markers may improve monitoring the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during anticoagulant treatment. We examined baseline levels of D-dimer and their association with stroke, cardiovascular death and major bleeding in 6,202 AF patients randomised to dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY trial. The effects of treatment on serial levels of D-dimer and coagulation factor (F) VIIa in 2,567 patients were also analysed. Baseline D-dimer levels were related to the rate of stroke/systemic embolism (SEE) with 0.64 % in the lowest quartile (Q1, as reference) (D-dimer < 298 µg/l), 1.38 % Q2 (D-dimer 298-473 µg/l), 1.71 % Q3 (D-dimer 474-822 µg/l) and 2.00 % in Q4 (D-dimer > 822 µg/l) (p=0.0007). Similar associations were shown for cardiovascular death and major bleeding. Addition of baseline D-dimer to established clinical risk factors improved prediction of stroke/SEE, cardiovascular death and major bleeding (C-index increased from 0.66 to 0.68, 0.71 to 0.73 and 0.66 to 0.67, respectively). Dabigatran provided a greater reduction of D-dimer levels than warfarin regardless of baseline anticoagulant treatment. On-treatment levels of FVIIa were markedly reduced by warfarin (median 12.1-13.8 mU/ml) but significantly higher with dabigatran (median 39.4-49.0 mU/ml) at all-time points. Dabigatran is associated with greater reduction in D-dimer without the pronounced reduction of FVIIa seen with warfarin. These different effects on the coagulation system might explain the better efficacy and less intracranial bleeding observed with dabigatran compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor VIIa; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a specific anti-Xa inhibitor that, in comparison to warfarin, has been found to be noninferior for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and to reduce bleeding significantly in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the higher-dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg) in patients with AF and a creatinine clearance of ≤95 mL/min. We report for the first time the clinical characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the FDA-approved population in the ENGAGE AF--TIMI 48 trial.. The patients included had been treated with either warfarin or edoxaban 60/30 mg and had a creatinine clearance of ≤95 mL/min. The primary efficacy was SSE, and the principal safety end point was major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis classification). Median follow-up was 2.8 years.. Patients in the FDA-approved cohort were older, were more likely female, and had higher CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores, as compared with patients not included in the FDA label. The primary end point occurred in 1.63%/y with edoxaban vs 2.02%/y with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, P = .023). Edoxaban significantly reduced the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72, P < .001) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, P = .015). Ischemic stroke rates were similar between the treatment groups (1.31%/y vs 1.39%/y, P = .97). Major bleeding was significantly lower with edoxaban (3.16%/y vs 3.77%/y; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98, P = .023).. In the FDA-approved cohort of the ENGAGE AF--TIMI 48 trial, treatment with edoxaban 60/30 mg was superior to warfarin in the prevention of SSE and significantly reduced cardiovascular death and bleeding, especially fatal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Approval; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

In the multinational, double-blind, double-dummy ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 phase 3 study, once-daily edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients from East Asia.. Patients aged ≥21 years with documented AF and CHADS score ≥2 were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) regimen or warfarin dose-adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/min, weighing ≤60 kg, or receiving strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors at randomization or during the study received a 50% dose reduction of edoxaban or matched placebo. This prespecified subanalysis included 1,943 patients from Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea. The annualized rate of stroke/SEE for higher-dose edoxaban was 1.34% vs. 2.62% for warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.90, P=0.02) and 2.52% for lower-dose edoxaban (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.63-1.54, P=0.93). Compared with warfarin (4.80%), major bleeding was significantly reduced for the higher-dose (2.86%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, P=0.011) and lower-dose regimens (1.59%; HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.54, P<0.001).. Once-daily edoxaban provided similar efficacy to warfarin while reducing major bleeding risk in the East Asian population.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia, Eastern; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) with patients with AF with mitral regurgitation (MR) or aortic regurgitation (AR) and patients without significant valve disease (no SVD).. Using Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) data, we analysed efficacy and safety outcomes, adjusting hazard ratios (HRs) for potential confounders using Cox regression analysis.. Among 14 119 intention-to-treat ROCKET AF trial patients, a trial that excluded patients with mitral stenosis or artificial valve prosthesis, 214 had AS with or without other valve abnormalities, 1726 had MR or AR and 12 179 had no SVD. After adjusting for prognostic factors, the composite of stroke, systemic embolism or vascular death increased approximately twofold in patients with AS (AS 10.84, MR or AR 4.54 and no SVD 4.31 events per 100 patient-years, p=0.0001). All-cause death also significantly increased (AS 11.22, MR or AR 4.90 and no SVD 4.39 events per 100 patient-years, p=0.0003). Major bleeding occurred more frequently in AS (adjusted HR 1.61, confidence intervals (CI) 1.03 to 2.49, p<0.05) and MR or AR (HR 1.30, 1.07 to 1.57, p<0.01) than in no SVD, but there was no difference between AS and MR or AR (HR 1.24, 0.78 to 1.97). The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was consistent among patients with and without valvular disease. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of major bleeding than warfarin in patients with MR or AR (HR 1.63, 1.15 to 2.31).. We found that patients with AF and AS on oral anticoagulants may have distinctly different efficacy and safety outcomes than patients with MR or AR or no SVD.. NCT00403767; Post-results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We studied the concomitant use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) on the efficacy and safety of the anti-Xa agent edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized trial that compared 2 dose regimens of edoxaban with warfarin. We studied both the approved high-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER; 60 mg daily reduced by one half in patients with anticipated increased drug exposure), as well as a lower-dose edoxaban regimen (LDER; 30 mg daily, also reduced by one half in patients with anticipated increased drug regimen). SAPT (aspirin in 92.5%) was administered at the discretion of the treating physician. Cox proportional hazard regressions stratified by SAPT at 3 months with treatment as a covariate were performed. The 4912 patients who received SAPT were more frequently male, with histories of coronary artery disease and diabetes, and had higher CHADS2Vasc and HAS BLED scores than did the 14 977 patients not receiving SAPT. When compared to patients not receiving SAPT, those receiving SAPT had a higher incidence of major bleeding; (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]=1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.67, P<0.001). SAPT did not alter the relative efficacy of edoxaban compared to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events (SEEs): edoxaban versus warfarin without SAPT, hazard ratio (HRadj for HDER)=0.94; (95% CI: 0.77-1.15) with SAPT, HRadj=0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-0.98), P interaction (Pint)=0.14. (HRadj for LDER versus warfarin without SAPT=1.19 (95% CI 0.99-1.43) With SAPT, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.76-1.39) Pint=0.42. Major bleeding was lower with edoxaban than warfarin both without SAPT, HRadj for HDER=0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95), and with SAPT, HRadj=0.82 (95% CI, 0.65-1.03; Pint=0.91). For LDER without SAPT (HRadj=0.56 [95% CI 0.46-0.67]) and with SAPT (HRadj=0.51 [95% CI 0.39-0.66]).. Patients with AF who were selected by their physicians to receive SAPT in addition to an anticoagulant had a similar risk of stroke/SEE and higher rates of bleeding than those not receiving SAPT. Edoxaban exhibited similar relative efficacy and reduced bleeding compared to warfarin, with or without concomitant SAPT.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to analyse randomized controlled study and real-world outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device and to compare costs with available antithrombotic therapies.. Left atrial appendage closure in NVAF in a real-world setting may result in lower stroke and major bleeding rates than reported in LAAC clinical trials. Left atrial appendage closure in both settings achieves cost parity in a relatively short period of time and may offer substantial savings compared with current therapies. Savings are most pronounced among higher risk patients and those unsuitable for anticoagulation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial allowed patients who completed the trial receiving their assigned dabigatran 150 mg (D150) or 110 mg (D110) twice a day to continue into the Long-term Multicenter Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) trial. This permitted assessment of outcomes over a median of 4.6 and a maximum of 6.7 years, respectively.. The analysed population included only those patients who completed RE-LY on dabigatran and continued into RELY-ABLE without interruption of assigned dabigatran. Cumulative risk was expressed as Kaplan-Meier plots. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazard modelling. Stroke or systemic embolization rates were 1.25 and 1.54% per year (D150 and D110, respectively); hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.96] (P = 0.02). Ischaemic stroke was 1.03 (D150) and 1.29%/year (D110); HR 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.95) (P = 0.01). Haemorrhagic stroke rates were 0.11 (D150) and 0.13%/year (D110); HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.51-1.62) (P = 0.75). Rates of major haemorrhage were 3.34 (D150) and 2.76%/year (D110); HR 1.22 (95% CI: 1.08-1.37) (P = 0.0008). Intracranial haemorrhage rates were 0.32 (D150) and 0.23%/year (D110); HR 1.37 (95% CI: 0.93-2.01) (P = 0.11). Mortality was 3.43 (D150) and 3.55%/year (D110); HR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87-1.08) (P = 0.54).. Annualized rates of all outcomes were constant with better efficacy of D150, less major bleeding with D110, and low intracerebral haemorrhage rates for both doses. There were no additional safety concerns. This is the longest continuous randomized experience of a novel anticoagulant.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation is associated with higher mortality. Identification of causes of death and contemporary risk factors for all-cause mortality may guide interventions.. In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression with backward elimination identified factors at randomization that were independently associated with all-cause mortality in the 14 171 participants in the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 73 years, and the mean CHADS2 score was 3.5. Over 1.9 years of median follow-up, 1214 (8.6%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier mortality rates were 4.2% at 1 year and 8.9% at 2 years. The majority of classified deaths (1081) were cardiovascular (72%), whereas only 6% were nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the rivaroxaban and warfarin arms (P=0.15). Heart failure (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33-1.70, P<0.0001) and age ≥75 years (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.90, P<0.0001) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Multiple additional characteristics were independently associated with higher mortality, with decreasing creatinine clearance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, male sex, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes being among the most strongly associated (model C-index 0.677).. In a large population of patients anticoagulated for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ≈7 in 10 deaths were cardiovascular, whereas <1 in 10 deaths were caused by nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. Optimal prevention and treatment of heart failure, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes may improve survival.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). LA device-related thrombus (DRT) is poorly defined and understood. We aimed to (1) develop consensus echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for DRT; (2) estimate the incidence of DRT; and (3) determine clinical event rates in patients with DRT. In phase 1 (training), a training manual was developed and reviewed by 3 echocardiographers with left atrial appendage closure device experience. All available transesophageal (TEE) studies in the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for embolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation (PROTECT-AF) trial patients with suspected DRT were reviewed in 2 subsequent phases. In phase 2 (primary blind read), each reviewer independently scored each study for DRT, and final echo criteria were developed. Unanimously scored studies were considered adjudicated, whereas all others were reevaluated by all reviewers in phase 3 (group adjudication read). DRT was suspected in 35 of 485 patients by the site investigator, the echocardiography core laboratory, or both; 93 of the individual TEE studies were available for review. In phase 2, 3 readers agreed on 67 (72%) of time points. Based on phases 1 and 2, 5 DRT criteria were developed. In phase 3, studies without agreement in phase 2 were adjudicated using these criteria. Overall, at least 1 TEE was DRT positive in 27 (5.7%) PROTECT-AF patients. Stroke, peripheral embolism, or cardiac/unexplained death occurred in subjects with DRT at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up. In conclusion, DRT were identified on at least 1 TEE in 27 PROTECT-AF patients, indicating a DRT incidence of 5.7%. Primary efficacy events in patients with DRT occurred at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up, intermediate in frequency between event rates previously reported for the overall device and warfarin arms in PROTECT-AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Thrombosis; Embolic Protection Devices; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The benefit of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation is based on a balance between reduction in ischaemic stroke and increase in major bleeding. We aimed to develop and validate a new biomarker-based risk score to improve the prognostication of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We developed and internally validated a new biomarker-based risk score for major bleeding in 14,537 patients with atrial fibrillation randomised to apixaban versus warfarin in the ARISTOTLE trial and externally validated it in 8468 patients with atrial fibrillation randomised to dabigatran versus warfarin in the RE-LY trial. Plasma samples for determination of candidate biomarker concentrations were obtained at randomisation. Major bleeding events were centrally adjudicated. The predictive values of biomarkers and clinical variables were assessed with Cox regression models. The most important variables were included in the score with weights proportional to the model coefficients. The ARISTOTLE and RE-LY trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00412984 and NCT00262600, respectively.. The most important predictors for major bleeding were the concentrations of the biomarkers growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cTnT-hs) and haemoglobin, age, and previous bleeding. The ABC-bleeding score (age, biomarkers [GDF-15, cTnT-hs, and haemoglobin], and clinical history [previous bleeding]) score yielded a higher c-index than the conventional HAS-BLED and the newer ORBIT scores for major bleeding in both the derivation cohort (0·68 [95% CI 0·66-0·70] vs 0·61 [0·59-0·63] vs 0·65 [0·62-0·67], respectively; ABC-bleeding vs HAS-BLED p<0·0001 and ABC-bleeding vs ORBIT p=0·0008). ABC-bleeding score also yielded a higher c-index score in the the external validation cohort (0·71 [95% CI 0·68-0·73] vs 0·62 [0·59-0·64] for HAS-BLED vs 0·68 [0·65-0·70] for ORBIT; ABC-bleeding vs HAS-BLED p<0·0001 and ABC-bleeding vs ORBIT p=0·0016). A modified ABC-bleeding score using alternative biomarkers (haematocrit, cTnI-hs, cystatin C, or creatinine clearance) also outperformed the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores.. The ABC-bleeding score, using age, history of bleeding, and three biomarkers (haemoglobin, cTn-hs, and GDF-15 or cystatin C/CKD-EPI) was internally and externally validated and calibrated in large cohorts of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulation therapy. The ABC-bleeding score performed better than HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores and should be useful as decision support on anticoagulation treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation.. BMS, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Diagnostics.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) requires monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR). We evaluated the agreement between two INR audit parameters, frequency in range (FIR) and proportion of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), using data from a global population of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF, the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF). Among 17 168 patients with 1-year follow-up data available at the time of the analysis, 8445 received VKA therapy (±antiplatelet therapy) at enrolment, and of these patients, 5066 with ≥3 INR readings and for whom both FIR and TTR could be calculated were included in the analysis. In total, 70 905 INRs were analysed. At the patient level, TTR showed higher values than FIR (mean, 56·0% vs 49·8%; median, 59·7% vs 50·0%). Although patient-level FIR and TTR values were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval; CI], 0·860 [0·852-0·867]), estimates from individuals showed widespread disagreement and variability (Lin's concordance coefficient [95% CI], 0·829 [0·821-0·837]). The difference between FIR and TTR explained 17·4% of the total variability of measurements. These results suggest that FIR and TTR are not equivalent and cannot be used interchangeably.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The high costs associated with treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) are primarily due to hospital care, but there are limited data to understand the reasons for and predictors of hospitalization in patients with AF.. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban with warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in AF. We described the frequency of and reasons for hospitalization during study follow-up and utilized Cox proportional hazards models to assess for baseline characteristics associated with all-cause hospitalization. Of 14 171 patients, 14% were hospitalized at least once. Of 2614 total hospitalizations, 41% were cardiovascular including 4% for AF; of the remaining, 12% were for bleeding. Compared with patients not hospitalized, hospitalized patients were older (74 vs. 72 years), and more frequently had diabetes (46 vs. 39%), prior MI (23 vs. 16%), and paroxysmal AF (19 vs. 17%), but less frequently had prior transient ischaemic attack/stroke (49 vs. 56%). After multivariable adjustment, lung disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.66], diabetes [1.22, (1.11-1.34)], prior MI [1.27, (1.13-1.42)], and renal dysfunction [HR 1.07 per 5 unit GFR < 65 mL/min, (1.04-1.10)] were associated with increased hospitalization risk. Treatment assignment was not associated with differential rates of hospitalization.. Nearly 1 in 7 of the moderate-to-high-risk patients with AF enrolled in this trial was hospitalized within 2 years, and both AF and bleeding were rare causes of hospitalization. Further research is needed to determine whether care pathways directed at comorbid conditions among AF patients could reduce the need for and costs associated with hospitalization.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Geography; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

History of bleeding strongly influences decisions for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF). We analyzed outcomes in relation to history of bleeding and randomization in ARISTOTLE trial patients.. The on-treatment safety population included 18,140 patients receiving at least 1 dose of study drug (apixaban) or warfarin. Centrally adjudicated outcomes in relation to bleeding history were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for randomized treatment and established risk factors. Efficacy end points were analyzed on the randomized (intention to treat) population. A bleeding history was reported at baseline in 3,033 patients (16.7%), who more often were male, with a history of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism and diabetes; higher CHADS2 scores, age, and body weight; and lower creatinine clearance and mean systolic blood pressure. Major (but not intracranial) bleeding occurred more frequently in patients with versus without a history of bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.61). There were no significant interactions between bleeding history and treatment for stroke/systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, death, or major bleeding, with fewer outcomes with apixaban versus warfarin for all of these outcomes independent of the presence/absence of a bleeding history.. In patients with AF in a randomized clinical trial of oral anticoagulants, a history of bleeding is associated with several risk factors for stroke and portends a higher risk of major-but not intracranial-bleeding, during anticoagulation. However, the beneficial effects of apixaban over warfarin for stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, death, or major bleeding remains consistent regardless of history of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) compared with warfarin in treating patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who developed acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA), particularly those receiving tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) therapy, remains unclear. Between April 2012 and December 2014, we conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to assess the current clinical practice for treating such patients. We divided the patients into two groups according to the administration of oral anticoagulants (warfarin or NOACs) and tPA therapy. The risk of any hemorrhagic or ischemic event was compared within 1 month after the onset of stroke. We analyzed 235 patients with AIS/TIA including 73 who received tPA therapy. Oral anticoagulants were initiated within 2-4 inpatient days. NOACs were administered to 49.8 % of patients, who were predominantly male, younger, had small infarcts, lower NIHSS scores, and had a lower all-cause mortality rate (0 vs. 4.2 %, P = 0.06) and a lower risk of any ischemic events (6.0 vs. 7.6 %, P = 0.797) compared with warfarin users. The prevalence of all hemorrhagic events was equivalent between the two groups. Early initiation of NOACs after tPA therapy appeared to lower the risk of hemorrhagic events, although there was no significant difference (0 vs. 5.6 %, P = 0.240). Although more clinicians are apt to prescribe NOACs in minor ischemic stroke, NOAC treatment may provide a potential benefit in such cases. Early initiation of NOACs after tPA therapy may reduce the risk of hemorrhagic events compared with warfarin.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events compared to younger patients. In a prespecified analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we evaluate clinical outcomes with edoxaban versus warfarin according to age.. Twenty-one thousand one-hundred and five patients enrolled in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial were stratified into 3 prespecified age groups: <65 (n=5497), 65 to 74 (n=7134), and ≥75 (n=8474) years. Older patients were more likely to be female, with lower body weight and reduced creatinine clearance, leading to higher rates of edoxaban dose reduction (10%, 18%, and 41% for the 3 age groups, P<0.001). Stroke or systemic embolic event (1.1%, 1.8%, and 2.3%) and major bleeding (1.8%, 3.3%, and 4.8%) rates with warfarin increased across age groups (Ptrend<0.001 for both). There were no interactions between age group and randomized treatment in the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. In the elderly (≥75 years), the rates of stroke/systemic embolic event were similar with edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio 0.83 [0.66-1.04]), while major bleeding was significantly reduced with edoxaban (hazard ratio 0.83 [0.70-0.99]). The absolute risk difference in major bleeding (-82 events/10 000 pt-yrs) and in intracranial hemorrhage (-73 events/10 000 pt-yrs) both favored edoxaban over warfarin in older patients.. Age has a greater influence on major bleeding than thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Given the higher rates of bleeding and death with increasing age, treatment of elderly patients with edoxaban provides an even greater absolute reduction in safety events over warfarin, compared to treatment with edoxaban versus warfarin in younger patients.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

 To determine whether the treatment effect of apixaban versus warfarin differs with increasing numbers of concomitant drugs used by patients with atrial fibrillation..  Post hoc analysis performed in 2015 of results from ARISTOTLE (apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation)-a multicentre, double blind, double dummy trial that started in 2006 and ended in 2011..  18 201 ARISTOTLE trial participants..  In the ARISTOTLE trial, patients were randomised to either 5 mg apixaban twice daily (n=9120) or warfarin (target international normalised ratio range 2.0-3.0; n=9081). In the post hoc analysis, patients were divided into groups according to the number of concomitant drug treatments used at baseline (0-5, 6-8, ≥9 drugs) with a median follow-up of 1.8 years..  Clinical outcomes and treatment effects of apixaban versus warfarin (adjusted for age, sex, and country)..  Each patient used a median of six drugs (interquartile range 5-9); polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) was seen in 13 932 (76.5%) patients. Greater numbers of concomitant drugs were used in older patients, women, and patients in the United States. The number of comorbidities increased across groups of increasing numbers of drugs (0-5, 6-8, ≥9 drugs), as did the proportions of patients treated with drugs that interact with warfarin or apixaban. Mortality also rose significantly with the number of drug treatments (P<0.001), as did rates of stroke or systemic embolism (1.29, 1.48, and 1.57 per 100 patient years, for 0-5, 6-8, and ≥9 drugs, respectively) and major bleeding (1.91, 2.46, and 3.88 per 100 patient years, respectively). Relative risk reductions in stroke or systemic embolism for apixaban versus warfarin were consistent, regardless of the number of concomitant drugs (Pinteraction=0.82). A smaller reduction in major bleeding was seen with apixaban versus warfarin with increasing numbers of concomitant drugs (Pinteraction=0.017). Patients with interacting (potentiating) drugs for warfarin or apixaban had similar outcomes and consistent treatment effects of apixaban versus warfarin..  In the ARISTOTLE trial, three quarters of patients had polypharmacy; this subgroup had an increased comorbidity, more interacting drugs, increased mortality, and higher rates of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. In terms of a potential differential response to anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and polypharmacy, apixaban was more effective than warfarin, and is at least just as safe.Trial registration ARISTOTLE trial, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Polypharmacy; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, was not found to be inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and was associated with significantly less bleeding. The higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER; 60 mg dose-reduced to 30 mg once daily) has been approved in various countries in Europe, the USA, and Japan. Among patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), symptomatic heart failure (HF) is an independent risk factor for lower time-in-therapeutic range, which reduces the efficacy and safety of VKA therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin across the spectrum of HF severity in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.. Of 14 071 patients randomized to well-controlled warfarin or the HDER, 5926 (42%) had no history of HF, 6344 (45%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II, and 1801 (13%) were in NYHA class III-IV. The efficacy of edoxaban compared with warfarin in preventing stroke/SEE was similar in patients without and with HF regardless of the severity of HF; [HDER vs. warfarin: No-HF: hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.11; NYHA class I-II: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12; NYHA class III-IV: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.25; Pinteraction = 0.97]. Compared with warfarin, HDER was consistently associated with lower risk of major bleeding (No-HF: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; NYHA class I-II: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; NYHA class III-IV: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.17; Pinteraction = 0.96).. The relative efficacy and safety of HDER compared with well-managed warfarin in AF patients with HF were similar to those without HF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Despite rapid clinical adoption of novel anticoagulants, it is unknown whether outcomes differ among patients with worsening renal function (WRF) taking these new drugs compared with warfarin. We aimed to determine whether the primary efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding) end points from the ROCKET AF trial (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation trial) differed among participants with WRF taking rivaroxaban and those taking warfarin.. After excluding patients without at least 1 follow-up creatinine measurement (n=1624), we included all remaining patients (n=12 612) randomly assigned to either rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. On-treatment WRF (a decrease of >20% from screening creatinine clearance measurement at any time point during the study) was evaluated as a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards models.. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with stable renal function (n=9292) and WRF (n=3320). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding were also similar, but WRF patients experienced a higher incidence of vascular death versus stable renal function (2.21 versus 1.41 events per 100 patient-years; P=0.026). WRF patients who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban had a reduction in stroke or systemic embolism compared with those taking warfarin (1.54 versus 3.25 events per 100 patient-years) that was not seen in patients with stable renal function who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (P=0.050 for interaction). There was no difference in major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding among WRF patients randomized to warfarin versus rivaroxaban.. Among patients with on-treatment WRF, rivaroxaban was associated with lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism compared with warfarin, without an increase in the composite bleeding end point.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation and previous ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulation. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we compared warfarin with edoxaban in patients with versus without previous IS/TIA.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) was a double-blind trial of 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0; median time-in-therapeutic range, 68.4%) versus once-daily edoxaban (higher-dose edoxaban regimen [HDER], 60/30 mg; lower-dose edoxaban regimen, 30/15 mg) with 2.8-year median follow-up. Primary end points included all stroke/systemic embolic events (efficacy) and major bleeding (safety). Because only HDER is approved, we focused on the comparison of HDER versus warfarin.. Of 5973 (28.3%) patients with previous IS/TIA, 67% had CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) >3 and 36% were ≥75 years. Compared with 15 132 without previous IS/TIA, patients with previous IS/TIA were at higher risk of both thromboembolism and bleeding (stroke/systemic embolic events 2.83% versus 1.42% per year; P<0.001; major bleeding 3.03% versus 2.64% per year; P<0.001; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.70% versus 0.40% per year; P<0.001). Among patients with previous IS/TIA, annualized intracranial hemorrhage rates were lower with HDER than with warfarin (0.62% versus 1.09%; absolute risk difference, 47 [8-85] per 10 000 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.92; P=0.02). No treatment subgroup interactions were found for primary efficacy (P=0.86) or for intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.28).. Patients with atrial fibrillation with previous IS/TIA are at high risk of recurrent thromboembolism and bleeding. HDER is at least as effective and is safer than warfarin, regardless of the presence or the absence of previous IS or TIA.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Clinicians have expressed a need for tools to assist in selecting treatments for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a computerized antithrombotic risk assessment tool (CARAT) on general practitioners' prescribing of antithrombotics for patients with atrial fibrillation.. A prospective, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 regions (in rural and urban settings) of general practice in New South Wales, Australia (January 2012-June 2013). General practitioner practices were assigned to an intervention arm (CARAT) or control arm (usual care). Antithrombotic therapy prescribing was assessed before and after application of CARAT.. Overall, the antithrombotic therapies for 393 patients were reviewed by 48 general practitioners; we found no significant baseline differences in use of antithrombotics between the control arm and intervention arm. Compared with control patients, intervention patients (n = 206) were 3.1 times more likely to be recommended warfarin therapy (over any other treatment option; P < .001) and 2.8 times more likely to be recommended any anticoagulant (in preference to antiplatelet; P = .02). General practitioners agreed with most (75.2%) CARAT recommendations; CARAT recommended that 75 (36.4%) patients change therapy. After application of CARAT, the proportion of patients receiving any antithrombotic therapy was unchanged from baseline (99.0%); however, anticoagulant use increased slightly (from 89.3% to 92.2%), and antiplatelet use decreased (from 9.7% to 6.8%).. Tools such as CARAT can assist clinicians in selecting antithrombotic therapies, particularly in upgrading patients from antiplatelets to anticoagulants. However, the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants has complicated the decision-making process, and tools must evolve to weigh the risks and benefits of these new therapy options.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; General Practice; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; New South Wales; Patient Selection; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing coronary stenting is complicated by the need for anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention and dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of stent thrombosis and coronary events. Triple antithrombotic therapy, typically comprising warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel, is associated with a high risk of bleeding. A modest-sized trial of oral anticoagulation with warfarin and clopidogrel without aspirin showed improvements in both bleeding and thrombotic events compared with triple therapy, but large trials are lacking. The RE-DUAL PCI trial (NCT 02164864) is a phase 3b, a strategy of prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. The main objective is to evaluate dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran etexilate (110 or 150 mg twice daily) and a P2Y12 inhibtor (either clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared with triple antithrombotic therapy with warfarin, a P2Y12 inhibtor (either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and low-dose aspirin (for 1 or 3 months, depending on stent type) in nonvalvular AF patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. The primary endpoint is time to first International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding event or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. Secondary endpoints are the composite of all cause death or thrombotic events (myocardial infarction, or stroke/systemic embolism) and unplanned revascularization; death or thrombotic events; individual outcome events; death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and unplanned revascularization. A hierarchical procedure for multiple testing will be used. The plan is to randomize ∼ 2500 patients at approximately 550 centers worldwide to try to identify new treatment strategies for this patient population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is non-inferior for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and is associated with less bleeding than well controlled warfarin therapy. Few safety data about edoxaban in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion are available.. We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation trial in 19 countries with 239 sites comparing edoxaban 60 mg per day with enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The dose of edoxaban was reduced to 30 mg per day if one or more factors (creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, low bodyweight [≤60 kg], or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors) were present. Block randomisation (block size four)-stratified by cardioversion approach (transoesophageal echocardiography [TEE] or not), anticoagulant experience, selected edoxaban dose, and region-was done through a voice-web system. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Follow-up was 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days to assess safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02072434.. Between March 25, 2014, and Oct 28, 2015, 2199 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (n=1095) or enoxaparin-warfarin (n=1104). The mean age was 64 years (SD 10·54) and mean CHA. ENSURE-AF is the largest prospective randomised clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Rates of major and CRNM bleeding and thromboembolism were low in the two treatment groups.. Daiichi Sankyo provided financial support for the study.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke prevention in anticoagulation-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has not been systematically studied.. To determine outcomes in anticoagulation-naïve patients (defined as those receiving an anticoagulant for <48 hours during the index episode of atrial fibrillation) scheduled for cardioversion.. This is a randomized, prospective, open-label, real-world study comparing apixaban to heparin plus warfarin. Early image-guided cardioversion is encouraged. For apixaban, the usual dose is 5 mg BID with a dose reduction to 2.5 mg BID if 2 of the following are present: age >80 years, weight <60 kg, or serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. If cardioversion is immediate, a single starting dose of 10 mg (or 5 mg if the dose is down-titrated) of apixaban is administered. Cardioversion may be attempted up to 90 days after randomization. Patients are followed up for 30 days after cardioversion or 90 days postrandomization if cardioversion is not performed within that timeframe. Outcomes are stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeds, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and death, all adjudication-blinded.. The warfarin-naive cohort from the ARISTOTLE study was considered the closest data set to the patients being recruited into this study. The predicted incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding within 30 days after randomization was approximately 0.75%. To adequately power for a noninferiority trial, approximately 48,000 participants would be needed, a number in excess of feasibility. The figure of 1,500 patients was considered clinically meaningful and achievable.. This first prospective cardioversion study of a novel anticoagulant in anticoagulation-naïve patients should influence clinical practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulation is often avoided in patients with atrial fibrillation who are at an increased risk of falling.. This study assessed the relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial in patients with atrial fibrillation judged to be at increased risk of falling.. We performed a pre-specified analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, comparing patients with versus without increased risk of falling.. Nine hundred patients (4.3%) were judged to be at increased risk of falling. These patients were older (median, 77 vs. 72 years; p < 0.001), and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. After multivariable adjustment, patients at increased risk of falling experienced more bone fractures caused by falling (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]: 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49 to 2.38; p < 0.001), major bleeding (HRadj: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.64; p = 0.023), life-threatening bleeding (HRadj: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.50; p = 0.013), and all-cause death (HRadj: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.70; p < 0.001), but not ischemic events including stroke/systemic embolic event (HRadj: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.51; p = 0.27). No treatment interaction was observed between either dosing regimens of edoxaban and warfarin for the efficacy and safety outcomes. Treatment with edoxaban resulted in a greater absolute risk reduction in severe bleeding events and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin.. Edoxaban is an attractive alternative to warfarin in patients at increased risk of falling, because it is associated with an even greater absolute reduction in severe bleeding events and mortality. (Effective aNticaoGulation with factor xA next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation [ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48]; NCT00781391).

Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Premedication; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulation prophylaxis for stroke is recommended for at-risk patients with either persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared outcomes in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal AF receiving oral anticoagulation.. Patients randomized in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial (n = 14 264) were grouped by baseline AF category: paroxysmal or persistent. Multivariable adjustment was performed to compare thrombo-embolic events, bleeding, and death between groups, in high-risk subgroups, and across treatment assignment (rivaroxaban or warfarin). Of 14 062 patients, 11 548 (82%) had persistent AF and 2514 (18%) had paroxysmal AF. Patients with persistent AF were marginally older (73 vs. 72, P = 0.03), less likely female (39 vs. 45%, P < 0.0001), and more likely to have previously used vitamin K antagonists (64 vs. 56%, P < 0.0001) compared with patients with paroxysmal AF. In patients randomized to warfarin, time in therapeutic range was similar (58 vs. 57%, P = 0.94). Patients with persistent AF had higher adjusted rates of stroke or systemic embolism (2.18 vs. 1.73 events per 100-patient-years, P = 0.048) and all-cause mortality (4.78 vs. 3.52, P = 0.006). Rates of major bleeding were similar (3.55 vs. 3.31, P = 0.77). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism in both types of AF did not differ by treatment assignment (rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, Pinteraction = 0.6).. In patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke receiving anticoagulation, those with persistent AF have a higher risk of thrombo-embolic events and worse survival compared with paroxysmal AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial, apixaban compared with warfarin reduced the risk of stroke, major bleed, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this ancillary study, we evaluated clinical consequences of major bleeds, as well as management and treatment effects of warfarin vs. apixaban.. Major International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding was defined as overt bleeding accompanied by a decrease in haemoglobin (Hb) of ≥2 g/dL or transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red cells, occurring at a critical site or resulting in death. Time to event [death, ischaemic stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI)] was evaluated by Cox regression models. The excess risk associated with bleeding was evaluated by separate time-dependent indicators for intracranial (ICH) and non-intracranial haemorrhage. Major bleeding occurred in 848 individuals (4.7%), of whom 126 (14.9%) died within 30 days. Of 176 patients with an ICH, 76 (43.2%) died, and of the 695 patients with major non-ICH, 64 (9.2%) died within 30 days of the bleeding. The risk of death, ischaemic stroke, or MI was increased roughly 12-fold after a major non-ICH bleeding event within 30 days. Corresponding risk of death following an ICH was markedly increased, with HR 121.5 (95% CI 91.3-161.8) as was stroke or MI with HR 21.95 (95% CI 9.88-48.81), respectively. Among patients with major bleeds, 20.8% received vitamin K and/or related medications (fresh frozen plasma, coagulation factors, factor VIIa) to stop bleeding within 3 days, and 37% received blood transfusion. There was no interaction between apixaban and warfarin and major bleeding on the risk of death, stroke, or MI.. Major bleeding was associated with substantially increased risk of death, ischaemic stroke, or MI, especially following ICH, and this risk was similarly elevated regardless of treatment with apixaban or warfarin. These results underscore the importance of preventing bleeding in anti-coagulated patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00412984.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Economic evaluation in genomic medicine is an emerging discipline to assess the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided treatment. Here, we developed a pharmaco-economic model to assess whether pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided warfarin treatment of elderly ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation in Croatia is cost effective compared with non-PGx therapy. The time horizon of the model was set at 1 year.. Our primary analysis indicates that 97.07% (95% CI: 94.08-99.34%) of patients belonging to the PGx-guided group have not had any major complications, compared with the control group (89.12%; 95% CI: 84.00-93.87%, p < 0.05). The total cost per patient was estimated at €538.7 (95% CI: €526.3-551.2) for the PGx-guided group versus €219.7 (95% CI: €137.9-304.2) for the control group. In terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, total QALYs was estimated at 0.954 (95% CI: 0.943-0.964) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.931-0.956) for the PGx-guided and the control groups, respectively. The true difference in QALYs was estimated at 0.01 (95% CI: 0.005-0.015) in favor of the PGx-guided group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the PGx-guided versus the control groups was estimated at €31,225/QALY.. Overall, our data indicate that PGx-guided warfarin treatment may represent a cost-effective therapy option for the management of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who developed ischemic stroke in Croatia.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Croatia; Drug Costs; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor that is non-inferior to well-managed warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEEs). We examined the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients who were vitamin K antagonist (VKA) naive or experienced.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized 21 105 patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke to once-daily edoxaban vs. warfarin. Subjects were followed for a median of 2.8 years. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or SEE. As a pre-specified subgroup, we analysed outcomes for those with or without prior VKA experience (>60 consecutive days). Higher-dose edoxaban significantly reduced the risk of stroke or SEE in patients who were VKA naive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.90] and was similar to warfarin in the VKA experienced (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.24; P interaction = 0.028). Lower-dose edoxaban was similar to warfarin for stroke or SEE prevention in patients who were VKA naive (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.73-1.15), but was inferior to warfarin in those who were VKA experienced (HR 1.31, 95% 1.08-1.60; P interaction = 0.019). Both higher-dose and lower-dose edoxaban regimens significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding regardless of prior VKA experience (P interaction = 0.90 and 0.71, respectively).. In patients with AF, edoxaban appeared to demonstrate greater efficacy compared with warfarin in patients who were VKA naive than VKA experienced. Edoxaban significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin regardless of prior VKA exposure.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban-Once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial, marked regional differences in control of warfarin anticoagulation, measured as the average individual patient time in the therapeutic range (iTTR) of the international normalized ratio (INR), were associated with longer inter-INR test intervals. The standard Rosendaal approach can produce biased low estimates of TTR after an appropriate dose change if the follow-up INR test interval is prolonged. We explored the effect of alternative calculations of TTR that more immediately account for dose changes on regional differences in mean iTTR in the ROCKET AF trial.. We used an INR imputation method that accounts for dose change. We compared group mean iTTR values between our dose change-based method with the standard Rosendaal method and determined that the differences between approaches depended on the balance of dose changes that produced in-range INRs ("corrections") versus INRs that were out of range in the opposite direction ("overshoots"). In ROCKET AF, the overall mean iTTR of 55.2% (Rosendaal) increased up to 3.1% by using the dose change-based approach, depending on assumptions. However, large inter-regional differences in anticoagulation control persisted.. TTR, the standard measure of control of warfarin anticoagulation, depends on imputing daily INR values for the vast majority of follow-up days. Our TTR calculation method may better reflect the impact of warfarin dose changes than the Rosendaal approach. In the ROCKET AF trial, this dose change-based approach led to a modest increase in overall mean iTTR but did not materially affect the large inter-regional differences previously reported.. URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Europe; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Latin America; Male; North America; Predictive Value of Tests; South Africa; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin is the most widely used oral anticoagulant worldwide, but serious bleeding complications are common. We tested whether genetic variants can identify patients who are at increased risk of bleeding with warfarin and, consequently, those who would derive a greater safety benefit with a direct oral anticoagulant rather than warfarin.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomised, double-blind trial in which patients with atrial fibrillation were assigned to warfarin to achieve a target international normalised ratio of 2·0-3·0, or to higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) edoxaban once daily. A subgroup of patients was included in a prespecified genetic analysis and genotyped for variants in CYP2C9 and VKORC1. The results were used to create three genotype functional bins (normal, sensitive, and highly sensitive responders to warfarin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00781391.. 14,348 patients were included in the genetic analysis. Of 4833 taking warfarin, 2982 (61·7%) were classified as normal responders, 1711 (35·4%) as sensitive responders, and 140 (2·9%) as highly sensitive responders. Compared with normal responders, sensitive and highly sensitive responders spent greater proportions of time over-anticoagulated in the first 90 days of treatment (median 2·2%, IQR 0-20·2; 8·4%, 0-25·8; and 18·3%, 0-32·6; ptrend<0·0001) and had increased risks of bleeding with warfarin (sensitive responders hazard ratio 1·31, 95% CI 1·05-1·64, p=0·0179; highly sensitive responders 2·66, 1·69-4·19, p<0·0001). Genotype added independent information beyond clinical risk scoring. During the first 90 days, when compared with warfarin, treatment with edoxaban reduced bleeding more so in sensitive and highly sensitive responders than in normal responders (higher-dose edoxaban pinteraction=0·0066; lower-dose edoxaban pinteraction=0·0036). After 90 days, the reduction in bleeding risk with edoxaban versus warfarin was similarly beneficial across genotypes.. CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes identify patients who are more likely to experience early bleeding with warfarin and who derive a greater early safety benefit from edoxaban compared with warfarin.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pharmacogenetics; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm treated with warfarin.. We used data from the Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction (WARCEF) trial to assess the relationship of TTR with the WARCEF primary outcome (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death), with death alone, ischemic stroke alone, major hemorrhage alone, and net clinical benefit (primary outcome and major hemorrhage combined). Multivariable Cox models were used to examine how the event risk changed with TTR and to compare the high TTR, low TTR, and aspirin-treated patients, with TTR being treated as a time-dependent covariate. A total of 2217 patients were included in the analyses; among whom 1067 were randomized to warfarin and 1150 were randomized to aspirin. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 3.6 (2.0-5.0) years. Mean (±SD) age was 61±11.3 years, with 80% being men. The mean (±SD) TTR was 57% (±28.5%). Increasing TTR was significantly associated with reduction in primary outcome (adjusted P<0.001), death alone (adjusted P=0.001), and improved net clinical benefit (adjusted P<0.001). A similar trend was observed for the other 2 outcomes, but significance was not reached (adjusted P=0.082 for ischemic stroke and adjusted P=0.109 for major hemorrhage).. In patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm, increasing TTR is associated with better outcome and improved net clinical benefit. Patients in whom good quality anticoagulation can be achieved may benefit from the use of anticoagulants.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00041938.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Warfarin

Strokes can have a catastrophic impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition to warfarin, two novel oral anticoagulants, i.e., dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been approved to prevent strokes. This study aimed to use direct measures to elicit patient-reported utilities (i.e., preferences) for anticoagulant-related outcomes. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 100 patients taking warfarin in an anticoagulation clinic. Utilities for six long-term and four short-term anticoagulant-related health states were elicited by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) methods. Health states with the highest SG-derived mean utility values were "well on rivaroxaban" (mean ± SD = 0.90 ± 0.15), "well on warfarin" (0.86 ± 0.17), and "well on dabigatran" (0.83 ± 0.18). Approximately half of the patients considered major ischemic stroke (-1.57 ± 6.77) and intracranial hemorrhage (-1.99 ± 6.98) to be worse than death. The percentages of patients who considered a particular health state worse than death ranged from 0 to 55 % among various health states assessed. The VAS had similar findings. Good logical consistency was observed in both VAS- and SG-derived utility values. Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage had a significant impact on patients' HRQoL. Greater variation in patients' preferences was observed for more severely impaired health states, indicating the need for individualized medical decision-making. In this study, both long-term and short-term health states were included in the utility assessment. The findings of this study can be used in cost-utility analysis of future anticoagulation therapies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Preference; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Warfarin

The evaluation of the "net clinical benefit" allows an integrated assessment of both the anti-ischemic and the prohemorrhagic effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin, and—in the absence of direct comparisons—may inform clinical decisions. We estimated the net clinical benefit of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin across the 4 phase III clinical trials performed in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We considered various composites of the main ischemic and hemorrhagic events, estimating the rate ratio of all treatment groups versus warfarin for each composite outcome. Because the clinical relevance of the various ischemic or hemorrhagic events is not identical, we then attributed to each of them a weight, according to its impact on death, as derived from previous studies. We evaluated a weighed net clinical benefit of each non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant compared with warfarin in the 4 trials.. The composite outcome of ischemic + hemorrhagic stroke was reduced by dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. The composite of disabling stroke + life-threatening bleeding was reduced by all non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. The composite of ischemic stroke + systemic embolism + myocardial infarction + hemorrhagic stroke + major bleeding was reduced by apixaban and edoxaban at both doses. By attributing weights to these events according to their impact on mortality, all non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants featured a favorable net clinical benefit compared with warfarin, albeit to a quantitatively different extent.. The choice of the proper antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation has to consider the net clinical benefit of each drug. However, all non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have a better efficacy/safety profile than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We designed a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation parallel group Phase 3b clinical trial comparing edoxaban (a new oral factor Xa inhibitor) with enoxaparin/warfarin followed by warfarin alone in subjects undergoing planned electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy end point is the composite end points of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, from randomization until the end of follow-up (day 56 post cardioversion). The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding, from the first administration of study drug to end of treatment (Day 28 post cardioversion) +3 days. The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat population whereas the primary safety analysis, on the safety population. The study includes stratification on the following levels: (i) approach to cardioversion (transoesophagel echocardiography or non-transoesophagel echocardiography) as determined by the Investigator; (ii) subject's experience in taking anticoagulants at the time of randomization (anticoagulant-experienced or anticoagulant-naïve); and (iii) assigned edoxaban dose (full 60 mg QD or reduced 30 mg dose QD). A subject with one or more factors (CrCl ≥15 mL/min and ≤50 mL/min, low body weight [≤60 kg], and concomitant use of p-pg inhibitors (excluding amiodarone) will receive a reduced dose (30 mg) of edoxaban if the subject is randomized to the edoxaban group. ENSURE-AF will be the largest prospective randomised trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion, also involving a Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulant-edoxaban.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Research Design; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, the higher-dose edoxaban (HDE) regimen had a similar incidence of ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, whereas a higher incidence was observed with the lower-dose regimen (LDE). Amiodarone increases edoxaban plasma levels via P-glycoprotein inhibition. The current pre-specified exploratory analysis was performed to determine the effect of amiodarone on the relative efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban.. At randomization, 2492 patients (11.8%) were receiving amiodarone. The primary efficacy endpoint of stroke or systemic embolic event was significantly lower with LDE compared with warfarin in amiodarone treated patients vs. patients not on amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.36-0.99 and HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, respectively; P interaction <0.01). In patients randomized to HDE, no such interaction for efficacy was observed (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.17 vs. HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05, P interaction = 0.446). Major bleeding was similar in patients on LDE (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59 vs. HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, P interaction = 0.131) and HDE (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38 vs. HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P interaction = 0.392) when compared with warfarin, independent of amiodarone use.. Patients randomized to the LDE treated with amiodarone at the time of randomization demonstrated a significant reduction in ischaemic events vs. warfarin when compared with those not on amiodarone, while preserving a favourable bleeding profile. In contrast, amiodarone had no effect on the relative efficacy and safety of HDE.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Darexaban (YM150) is a novel oral anticoagulant that directly inhibits factor Xa.. To investigate the optimal daily dose regimen of YM150 in subjects with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. In this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, dose-confirmation study (NCT00938730), patients with NVAF were randomized to darexaban 15 mg bid, 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, 60 mg qd, 60 mg bid or 120 mg qd, or warfarin qd. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adjudicated major and/or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability.. A total of 1297 patients were randomized and finally included in the trial (median age, 66 [range 30-89] years; 68.8% male): 981 completed treatment for a median of 28 weeks (interquartile range, 24-36). At daily doses of 30-60 mg, darexaban bid resulted in fewer bleeding events than darexaban qd. For darexaban 120 mg, the bid regimen produced more bleeding events than the qd regimen. Although few efficacy endpoints occurred, these decreased with increasing daily darexaban dose. Darexaban decreased plasma D-dimer levels (index of thrombogenesis) after 4 weeks of treatment by 21.5-33.8% compared with baseline, which was comparable with warfarin at the higher darexaban doses. Darexaban was well tolerated with no liver toxicity.. In this Phase II study in patients with NVAF, a lower bleeding rate was observed in the 120 mg daily darexaban group compared with warfarin with a reduction in plasma D-dimer as marker for hemostasis. Further investigation of the optimal dose of darexaban for the prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF would need to be considered.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azepines; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Double-Blind Method; Down-Regulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is frequent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The RE-LY trial permits evaluation of patient characteristics, outcomes and the effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate among diabetic individuals.. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic patients and the relative efficacy of each dose of dabigatran (150 mg bid and 110 mg bid) versus warfarin was evaluated.. Of 18,113 patients in RE-LY, 4221 patients (23.3%) had DM. Patients with DM were younger (70.9 vs. 71.7 years), more likely to have hypertension (86.6% vs. 76.5%), coronary artery disease (37.4% vs. 24.9%) and peripheral vascular disease (5.6% vs. 3.2%); (all p<0.01). Time in therapeutic range for warfarin-treated patients was 65% for diabetic versus 68% for non-diabetic patients (p<0.001). Regardless of assigned treatment, stroke or systemic embolism was more common among patients with DM (1.9% per year vs. 1.3% per year, p<0.001). DM was also associated with an increased risk of death (5.1% per year vs. 3.5% per year, p<0.001) and major bleeding (4.2% per year vs. 3.0% per year, p<0.001). The absolute reduction in stroke or systemic embolism with dabigatran compared to warfarin was greater among patients with DM than those without DM (dabigatran 110 mg: 0.59% per year vs. 0.05% per year; dabigatran 150 mg: 0.89% per year vs. 0.51% per year).. Compared to non-DM patients, AF patients with DM derive a greater absolute risk reduction in embolic events when treated with dabigatran. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Apixaban is approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial included a substantial number of patients with valvular heart disease and only excluded patients with clinically significant mitral stenosis or mechanical prosthetic heart valves.. We compared the effect of apixaban and warfarin on rates of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death in patients with and without moderate or severe valvular heart disease using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Of the 18 201 patients enrolled in ARISTOTLE, 4808 (26.4%) had a history of moderate or severe valvular heart disease or previous valve surgery. Patients with valvular heart disease had higher rates of stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding than patients without valvular heart disease. There was no evidence of a differential effect of apixaban over warfarin in patients with and without valvular heart disease in reducing stroke and systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.97 and HR, 0.84; 95%, CI 0.67-1.04; interaction P=0.38), causing less major bleeding (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.04 and HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; interaction P=0.23), and reducing mortality (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.22 and HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; interaction P=0.10).. More than a quarter of the patients in ARISTOTLE with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation had moderate or severe valvular heart disease. There was no evidence of a differential effect of apixaban over warfarin in reducing stroke or systemic embolism, causing less bleeding, and reducing death in patients with and without valvular heart disease.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

It has been suggested that direct oral anticoagulants are being preferentially used in low risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Understanding the changing risk profile of new AF patients treated with warfarin is important for interpreting the quality of warfarin delivery through an anticoagulation clinic. Six anticoagulation clinics participating in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative enrolled 1293 AF patients between 2010 and 2014 as an inception cohort. Abstracted data included demographics, comorbidities, medication use and all INR values. Risk scores including CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, SAMe-TT2R2, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were calculated for each patient at the time of warfarin initiation. The quality of anticoagulation was assessed using the Rosendaal time in the therapeutic range (TTR) during the first 6 months of treatment. Between 2010 and 2014, patients initiating warfarin therapy for AF had an increasing mean CHADS2 (2.0 ± 1.1 to 2.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.02) and CCI (4.7 ± 1.8 to 5.1 ± 2.0, p = 0.03), and a trend towards increasing mean CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and SAMe-TT2R2 scores. The actual TTR remained unchanged over the study period (62.6 ± 18.2 to 62.7 ± 17.0, p = 0.98), and the number of INR checks did not change (18.9 ± 5.2 to 18.5 ± 5.1, p = 0.06). Between 2010 and 2014, AF patients newly starting warfarin had mild increases in risk for stroke and death with sustained quality of warfarin therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

Anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence of ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but in some patients, they also cause bleeding, particularly intracranial hemorrhage. One of the independent predictors of intracerebral hemorrhage is the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs); a high incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage is reported in warfarin-treated patients with multiple CMBs. Longitudinal study suggested that the presence of CMBs at baseline is a predictor of new CMBs in warfarin-treated patients. However, there has been no study on the progression of CMBs in patients receiving the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. This study tests the hypothesis that the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke is lower in patients receiving NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) than in those receiving warfarin, and this difference reflects the difference in the effects of warfarin and NOACs on the progression of CMBs.. We will enroll 200 patients with at least 1 CMB detected by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (T2(∗)-weighted imaging) at baseline and who have received NOACs or warfarin for at least 12 months. Primary end point is the proportion of subjects with an increased number of CMBs at month 12 of treatment with NOACs or warfarin. If the results of this study support the efficacy of NOACs for preventing increase of CMBs, this would be of great interest to domestic and overseas clinicians, in view of the potential therapeutic impact, including that on primary prevention of ischemic stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Pilot Projects; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We sought to assess the performance of existing bleeding risk scores, such as the Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score or the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index (OBRI), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) treated with warfarin or aspirin. We calculated HAS-BLED and OBRI risk scores for 2,305 patients with HFrEF in SR enrolled in the Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction trial. Proportional hazards models were used to test whether each score predicted major bleeding, and comparison of different risk scores was performed using Harell C-statistic and net reclassification improvement index. For the warfarin arm, both scores predicted bleeding risk, with OBRI having significantly greater C-statistic (0.72 vs 0.61; p = 0.03) compared to HAS-BLED, although the net reclassification improvement for comparing OBRI to HAS-BLED was not significant (0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.18 to 0.37). Performance of the OBRI and HAS-BLED risk scores was similar for the aspirin arm. For participants with OBRI scores of 0 to 1, warfarin compared with aspirin reduced ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.98, p = 0.042) without significantly increasing major bleeding (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.30, p = 0.51). For those with OBRI score of ≥2, there was a trend for reduced ischemic stroke with warfarin compared to aspirin (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.15, p = 0.12), but major bleeding was increased (HR 4.04, 95% CI 1.99 to 8.22, p <0.001). In conclusion, existing bleeding risk scores can identify bleeding risk in patients with HFrEF in SR and could be tested for potentially identifying patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile for antithrombotic therapy with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Warfarin

In Asian patients in RE-LY, dabigatran etexilate (DE) was as effective as warfarin, with a significantly lower bleeding risk. We evaluated the relationship between baseline renal function or CHADS2 score and efficacy or safety outcomes in these patients.. Asian patients (n=2,782) were categorized according to baseline renal function or CHADS2 score, and efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed for DE (110 mg and 150 mg b.i.d.) vs. warfarin. There was an increase in the rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding with worsening renal function and CHADS2 score. For stroke/systemic embolism (primary efficacy endpoint), there was no treatment interaction for dabigatran at either 110 or 150 mg b.i.d. compared with warfarin related to patients' baseline renal function (Pinteraction=0.56 for DE 110 mg and 0.62 for DE 150 mg vs. warfarin) or CHADS2 score (Pinteraction=0.68 for DE 110 mg and 0.31 for DE 150 mg vs. warfarin). For major bleeding, there was no treatment interaction by creatinine clearance category observed for either dose (Pinteraction=0.60 and 0.62 for DE 110 mg and DE 150 mg, respectively). Baseline CHADS2 score had no significant effect on bleeding event rates with DE vs. warfarin.. Bleeding and stroke rates in Asian patients varied according to renal function and CHADS2 score, but the relative benefits of DE over warfarin were preserved when analyzed by subcategories.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Warfarin

Hypertension is frequent in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is an independent risk factor for stroke. The Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant TherapY (RE-LY) trial found dabigatran 110 mg (D110) and 150 mg twice daily (D150) noninferior or superior to warfarin for stroke reduction in patients with AF, with either a reduction (D110) or similar rates (D150) of major bleeding. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in patients with and without hypertension. The quality of blood pressure control was also assessed. In RE-LY, 14,283 patients (78.9%) had hypertension. The mean blood pressure at baseline was 132.6 ± 17.6/77.7 ± 10.6 and 124.8 ± 16.7/74.6 ± 10.0 mm Hg for patients with and without hypertension, respectively. More patients with hypertension were diabetic (25.6% vs 14.8%, p <0.001), women (38.6% vs 28.3%, p <0.001), and had greater CHADS2 (2.3 vs 1.4, p <0.001) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (3.8 vs 2.8, p <0.001). Mean blood pressure in all treatment arms in hypertensive patients was similar (130 ± 18/76 ± 11 mm Hg) during the trial. The efficacy and safety of D110 and D150 compared to warfarin were similar (p = nonsignificant) in hypertensive (stroke/systemic embolism rate of 1.47%, 1.20%, and 1.81% and major bleed rate of 2.89%, 3.70%, and 3.69% in the D110, D150, and W, respectively) and normotensive patients (stroke/systemic embolism rate of 1.79%, 0.78%, and 1.36% and major bleed rate of 2.84%, 2.37%, and 3.03% per year in the D110, D150, and W, respectively). Hypertensive patients had more major bleeds (3.39% vs 2.76%; p = 0.007). Intracranial bleeds were similar (0.47% vs 0.31%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, patients with hypertension in RE-LY were more likely female, diabetic, with a greater CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Blood pressure control in RE-LY was excellent. The benefits of dabigatran over warfarin, including a substantial reduction of intracranial hemorrhage, were similar in both hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To assess clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety according to sex during anticoagulation with apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial that included 11 785 (64.7%) men and 6416 (35.3%) women with atrial fibrillation or flutter randomized to receive either warfarin or apixaban. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism; secondary efficacy endpoints were death from any cause and cardiovascular death. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding; secondary safety endpoints were a composite of major bleeding and non-major clinically relevant bleeding. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in women vs. men [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR): 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.12; P = 0.38]. However, among patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, women had a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with men (adjHR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.97; P = 0.036). Women also had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjHR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55-0.73; P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular death (adjHR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.51-0.75; P < 0.0001), and a trend towards less major bleeding (adjHR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74-1.01; P = 0.066) and major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (adjHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-1.00; P = 0.049). The efficacy and safety benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent regardless of sex.. In the ARISTOTLE trial, women had a similar rate of stroke or systemic embolism but a lower risk of mortality and less clinically relevant bleeding than men. The efficacy and safety benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent in men and women.. ARISTOTLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00412984.

Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study was designed to compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, Xa factor inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban used to prevent stroke in 280 elderly patients in patients with age-specific non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The treatment of patients aged 65-74 and 75-80 yearsfor 2 years with dab itragan (110 mg b.i.d), apixaban (5 mg b. i. d), and rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) prevented stroke as effectively as warfarin therapy but less frequently caused severe intracranial hemorrhage. It is concluded that these new anticoagulants can be used as alternative medication for antithrombotic therapy of elderly patients with age-specific non-valvular atrialfibrillation.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative risk of major bleeding with left atrial appendage (LAA) closure compared with long-term warfarin therapy.. LAA closure is an alternative approach to chronic oral anticoagulation for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We conducted a pooled, patient-level analysis of the 2 randomized clinical trials that compared WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) LAA closure with long-term warfarin therapy in AF.. A total of 1,114 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. The overall rate of major bleeding from randomization to the end of follow-up was similar between treatment groups (3.5 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patient-years; rate ratio [RR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 1.40; p = 0.84). LAA closure significantly reduced bleeding >7 days post-randomization (1.8 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patient-years; RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.75; p = 0.001), with the difference emerging 6 months after randomization (1.0 events vs. 3.5 events per 100 patient-years; RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.49; p < 0.001), when patients assigned to LAA closure were able to discontinue adjunctive oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The reduction in bleeding with LAA closure was directionally consistent across all patient subgroups.. There was no difference in the overall rate of major bleeding in patients assigned to LAA closure compared with extended warfarin therapy over 3 years of follow-up. However, LAA closure significantly reduced bleeding beyond the procedural period, particularly once adjunctive pharmacotherapy was discontinued. The favorable effect of LAA closure on long-term bleeding should be considered when selecting a stroke prevention strategy for patients with nonvalvular AF. (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation; NCT00129545; and Evaluation of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy [PREVAIL]; NCT01182441).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheterization; Embolic Protection Devices; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In 21,105 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial demonstrated that both higher dose (60mg/30mg dose reduced) and lower dose (30mg/15mg dose reduced) once-daily regimens of edoxaban were non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism (SE), with significantly lower rates of bleeding and cardiovascular death. Higher dose edoxaban was associated with a greater reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke than lower dose edoxaban, and the FDA approved higher dose edoxaban in patients with creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min. This study evaluated the economic value of higher dose edoxaban vs warfarin based on data from patients in ENGAGE within the FDA-approved population.. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban vs warfarin over a lifetime horizon from the US healthcare system perspective using a Markov model based on a combination of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial data, US life tables, and published literature on the costs and long-term outcomes of non-fatal cardiovascular and bleeding events. Data from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial were used to calculate age-adjusted event rates for warfarin and hazard ratios (HRs) for the relative impact of edoxaban on embolic and bleeding complications. Based on the wholesale acquisition price, edoxaban and warfarin were assumed to cost $9.24 and $0.36/day, respectively.. For edoxaban vs warfarin, lifetime incremental costs and QALYs were $16,384 and 0.444, respectively, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,862/QALY gained, using data from patients with creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. ICERs were more favorable for patients without compared to those with prior warfarin use; ICERs differed minimally by CHADS2 score.. Despite its higher acquisition cost, edoxaban is an economically attractive alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and SE in patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min. These results were robust to variation of key model parameters, including assumptions regarding the cost and quality-of-life impact of stroke and bleeding events, and were favorable across both CHADS2 score stroke-risk categories.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Inflammation has been associated with cardiovascular disease and the burden of atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study we evaluate inflammatory biomarkers and future cardiovascular events in AF patients in the RE-LY study.. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) (n = 6,187), and fibrinogen (n = 4,893) were analyzed at randomization; outcomes were evaluated by Cox models and C-statistics.. Adjusted for clinical risk factors IL-6 was independently associated with stroke or systemic embolism (P = .0041), major bleedings (P = .0001), vascular death (P < .0001), and a composite thromboembolic outcome (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism and vascular death) (P < .0001). CRP was independently related to myocardial infarction (P = .0047), vascular death (P = .0004), and the composite thromboembolic outcome (P = .0001). When further adjusted for cardiac (troponin and N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) and renal (cystatin-C) biomarkers on top of clinical risk factors IL-6 remained significantly related to vascular death (P < .0001), major bleeding (P < .0170) and the composite thromboembolic outcome (P < .0001), and CRP to myocardial infarction (.0104). Fibrinogen was not associated with any outcome. C-index for stroke or systemic embolism increased from 0.615 to 0.642 (P = .0017) when adding IL-6 to the clinically used CHA2DS2-VASc risk score with net reclassification improvement of 28%.. In patients with AF, IL-6 is related to higher risk of stroke and major bleeding, and both markers are related to higher risk of vascular death and the composite of thromboembolic events independent of clinical risk factors. Adjustment for cardiovascular biomarkers attenuated the prognostic value, although IL-6 remained related to mortality, the composite of thromboembolic events, and major bleeding, and CRP to myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Interleukin-6; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing have been proposed to improve patient’s management. This study is aimed to determine whether a CYP2C9- VKORC1- CYP4F2-based pharmacogenetic algorithm is superior to a standard, clinically adopted, pharmacodynamic method. Two-hundred naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to trial arms and 180 completed the study. No significant differences were found in the number of out-of-range INRs (INR<2.0 or >3.0) (p = 0.79) and in the mean percentage of time spent in the therapeutic range (TTR) after 19 days in the pharmacogenetic (51.9%) and in the control arm (53.2%, p = 0.71). The percentage of time spent at INR>4.0 was significantly lower in the pharmacogenetic (0.7%) than in the control arm (1.8%) (p = 0.02). Genotype-guided warfarin dosing is not superior in overall anticoagulation control when compared to accurate clinical standard of care.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01178034.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Cytochrome P450 Family 4; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

To more accurately quantify the proportion of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that may be inappropriately treated with warfarin for stroke prevention. Patients with AF have an increased risk of stroke, which is lowered by the use of warfarin. However there is likely more potential harm than benefit in patients that do not have additional stroke risk factors. Studies have described overuse of warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in lowest risk patients. However, many of those studies did not assess for electrical cardioversion (ECV) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as indications for warfarin therapy. Data from 1852 non-valvular AF patients treated with warfarin between October 2009 and October 2011 at seven anticoagulation centers participating in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative registry were analyzed. Low risk AF patients were risk stratified using the CHADS2 scoring systems, with a score of zero representing lowest risk. 193 (10.4 %) of AF patients receiving warfarin were identified as having the lowest risk of stroke by the CHADS2 score. Of the patients with CHADS2 = 0, 130 (67.4 %) had undergone a recent ECV and/or RFA. Of all AF patients, only 63 (3.4 %) had a CHADS2 score of 0 and no recent ECV or RFA. The vast majority of AF patients receiving anticoagulation in this multi-center registry are doing so in accordance with national and international guidelines. In contrast to prior population-based studies, very few low risk patients are receiving inappropriate warfarin therapy for stroke prophylaxis in AF, when procedure-based indications are also considered.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Michigan; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

This study assessed the effects and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. In this double-blind clinical trial, a total of 353 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who were at risk of stroke or systemic embolism were enrolled to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. The primary effect endpoint occurred in five patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.29% per year) and in seven patients in the warfarin group (2.91% per year) (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; p = 0.03). Major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 38 patients (14.3% per year) in the rivaroxaban group and in 36 patients (13.7% per year) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.14; p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between these two arms (p > 0.05). In conclusion, oral administration of rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism without significantly increasing the safety concern.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Results from a trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in 1280 Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) revealed that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the principal safety outcome. In this subanalysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin in relation to patients' CHADS2 scores.. The mean CHADS2 score was 3.25, and the most frequent scores were 3 and 4. No statistically significant interactions were observed between principal safety outcome event rates and CHADS2 scores with respect to treatment groups (P value for interaction = .700). Irrespective of stratification into moderate- and high-risk groups based on CHADS2 scores of 2 and 3 or more, respectively, no differences in principal safety outcome event rates were observed between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients (moderate-risk group: hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-1.95; high-risk group: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .86-1.45; P value for interaction = .488). The primary efficacy end point rate in the rivaroxaban-treated group was numerically lower than in the warfarin-treated group, regardless of risk group stratification (moderate-risk group: HR, .46; 95% CI, .09-2.37; high-risk group: HR, .49; 95% CI, .22-1.11; P value for interaction = .935).. This subanalysis indicated that the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were similar, regardless of CHADS2 score.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We investigated the prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (MI) and incidence of ischaemic cardiovascular (CV) events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. In ROCKET AF, 14 264 patients with nonvalvular AF were randomized to rivaroxaban or warfarin. The key efficacy outcome for these analyses was CV death, MI, and unstable angina (UA). This pre-specified analysis was performed on patients while on treatment. Rates are per 100 patient-years. Overall, 2468 (17%) patients had prior MI at enrollment. Compared with patients without prior MI, these patients were more likely to be male (75 vs. 57%), on aspirin at baseline (47 vs. 34%), have prior congestive heart failure (78 vs. 59%), diabetes (47 vs. 39%), hypertension (94 vs. 90%), higher mean CHADS2 score (3.64 vs. 3.43), and fewer prior strokes or transient ischaemic attacks (46 vs. 54%). CV death, MI, or UA rates tended to be lower in patients assigned rivaroxaban compared with warfarin [2.70 vs. 3.15; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.00; P = 0.0509]. CV death, MI, or UA rates were higher in those with prior MI compared with no prior MI (6.68 vs. 2.19; HR 3.04, 95% CI 2.59-3.56) with consistent results for CV death, MI, or UA for rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in prior MI compared with no prior MI (P interaction = 0.10).. Prior MI was common and associated with substantial risk for subsequent cardiac events. Patients with prior MI assigned rivaroxaban compared with warfarin had a non-significant 14% reduction of ischaemic cardiac events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We assessed the effect of concomitant aspirin use on the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In ARISTOTLE, 18 201 patients were randomized to apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin. Concomitant aspirin use was left to the discretion of the treating physician. In this predefined analysis, simple and marginal structured models were used to adjust for baseline and time-dependent confounders associated with aspirin use. Outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, mortality, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and any bleeding. On Day 1, 4434 (24%) patients were taking aspirin. Irrespective of concomitant aspirin use, apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism [with aspirin: apixaban 1.12% vs. warfarin 1.91%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.85 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.11% vs. warfarin 1.32%, HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P interaction = 0.10] and caused less major bleeding than warfarin (with aspirin: apixaban 3.10% vs. warfarin 3.92%, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.82% vs. warfarin 2.78%, HR without aspirin 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78; P interaction = 0.29). Similar results were seen in the subgroups of patients with and without arterial vascular disease.. Apixaban had similar beneficial effects on stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding compared with warfarin, irrespective of concomitant aspirin use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of major clinical and thromboembolic events after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in subjects treated with apixaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, compared with warfarin.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events may occur after cardioversion. This risk is lowered with vitamin K antagonists and dabigatran.. Using data from the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion.. A total of 743 cardioversions were performed in 540 patients: 265 first cardioversions in patients assigned to apixaban and 275 in those assigned to warfarin. The mean time to the first cardioversion for patients assigned to warfarin and apixaban was 243 ± 231 days and 251 ± 248 days, respectively; 75% of the cardioversions occurred by 1 year. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In patients undergoing cardioversion, no stroke or systemic emboli occurred in the 30-day follow-up period. Myocardial infarction occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) receiving warfarin and 1 patient receiving apixaban (0.3%). Major bleeding occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) receiving warfarin and 1 patient receiving apixaban (0.3%). Death occurred in 2 patients (0.5%) receiving warfarin and 2 patients receiving apixaban (0.6%).. Major cardiovascular events after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation are rare and comparable between warfarin and apixaban. (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]; NCT00412984).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

High-sensitivity troponin-I (hs-TnI) measurement improves risk assessment for cardiovascular events in many clinical settings, but the added value in atrial fibrillation patients has not been described.. At randomization, hs-TnI was analyzed in 14 821 atrial fibrillation patients in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial comparing apixaban with warfarin. The associations between hs-TnI concentrations and clinical outcomes were evaluated by using adjusted Cox analysis. The hs-TnI assay detected troponin (≥1.3 ng/L) in 98.5% patients, 50% had levels >5.4, 25% had levels >10.1, and 9.2% had levels ≥23 ng/L (the 99th percentile in healthy individuals). During a median of 1.9 years follow-up, annual rates of stroke or systemic embolism ranged from 0.76% in the lowest hs-TnI quartile to 2.26% in the highest quartile (>10.1 ng/L). In multivariable analysis, hs-TnI was significantly associated with stroke or systemic embolism, adjusted hazard ratio 1.98 (1.42-2.78), P=0.0007. hs-TnI was also significantly associated with cardiac death; annual rates ranged from 0.40% to 4.24%, hazard ratio 4.52 (3.05-6.70), P<0.0001, in the corresponding groups, and for major bleeding hazard ratio 1.44 (1.11-1.86), P=0.0250. Adding hs-TnI levels to the CHA2DS2VASc score improved c-statistics from 0.629 to 0.653 for stroke or systemic embolism, and from 0.591 to 0.731 for cardiac death. There were no significant interactions with study treatment.. Troponin-I is detected in 98.5% and elevated in 9.2% of atrial fibrillation patients. The hs-TnI level is independently associated with a raised risk of stroke, cardiac death, and major bleeding and improves risk stratification beyond the CHA2DS2VASc score. The benefits of apixaban in comparison with warfarin are consistent regardless of hs-TnI levels.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Death; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Troponin I; Warfarin

Vascular disease is included in a risk scoring system to predict stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This post hoc analysis of ROCKET AF aimed to determine the absolute rates of stroke and bleeding, and the relative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD). Peripheral artery disease was defined on the case-report form as the presences of intermittent claudication, amputation for arterial insufficiency, vascular reconstruction, bypass surgery, or percutaneous intervention to the extremities, or previously documented abdominal aortic aneurysm.. ROCKET AF was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing rivaroxaban and warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. A total of 839 (5.9%) patients in ROCKET AF had PAD. Patients with and without PAD had similar rates of stroke or systemic embolism [HR: 1.04, 95% CI (0.72, 1.50), P = 0.84] and major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding [HR: 1.11, 95% CI (0.96, 1.28), P = 0.17], respectively. The efficacy of rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in patients with PAD (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.63-2.22) and without PAD (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.02; interaction P = 0.34). There was a significant interaction for major or NMCR bleeding in patients with PAD treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.86) compared with those without PAD (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.95-1.11; interaction P = 0.037).. Patients with PAD in ROCKET AF did not have a statistically significant higher risk of stroke or systemic embolism than patients without PAD, and there were similar efficacy outcomes in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin. In PAD patients, there was a higher risk of major bleeding or NMCR bleeding with rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin (interaction P = 0.037). Further investigation is warranted to validate this subgroup analysis and determine the optimal treatment in this high-risk cohort of AF patients with PAD.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study sought to report additional safety results from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated similar risks of stroke/systemic embolism and major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (principal safety endpoint) with rivaroxaban and warfarin.. The risk of the principal safety and component bleeding endpoints with rivaroxaban versus warfarin were compared, and factors associated with major bleeding were examined in a multivariable model.. The principal safety endpoint was similar in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups (14.9 vs. 14.5 events/100 patient-years; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.11). Major bleeding risk increased with age, but there were no differences between treatments in each age category (<65, 65 to 74, ≥75 years; pinteraction = 0.59). Compared with those without (n = 13,455), patients with a major bleed (n = 781) were more likely to be older, current/prior smokers, have prior gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mild anemia, and a lower calculated creatinine clearance and less likely to be female or have a prior stroke/transient ischemic attack. Increasing age, baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were independently associated with major bleeding risk; female sex and DBP <90 mm Hg were associated with a decreased risk.. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had similar risk for major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. Age, sex, DBP, prior GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were associated with the risk of major bleeding. (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: NCT00403767).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Pressure; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Renal impairment increases the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RELY) trial, dabigatran, with ≈80% renal elimination, displayed superiority over warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the 150-mg dose and significantly less major bleeding in the 110-mg dose in 18 113 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This prespecified study investigated these outcomes in relation to renal function.. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations in all randomized patients with available creatinine at baseline (n=17 951), and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate was estimated in a subpopulation with measurements available (n=6190). A glomerular filtration rate ≥80, 50 to <80, and <50 mL/min was estimated in 32.6%, 47.6%, and 19.8% and in 21.6%, 59.6%, and 18.8% of patients based on Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI, respectively. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality increased as renal function decreased. The rates of stroke or systemic embolism were lower with dabigatran 150 mg and similar with 110 mg twice daily compared with warfarin, without significant heterogeneity in subgroups defined by renal function (interaction P>0.1 for all). For the outcome of major bleeding, there were significant interactions between treatment and renal function according to CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, respectively (P<0.05). The relative reduction in major bleeding with either dabigatran dose compared with warfarin was greater in patients with glomerular filtration rate ≥80 mL/min.. The efficacy of both dosages of dabigatran was consistent with the overall trial irrespective of renal function. However, with the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, both dabigatran dosages displayed significantly lower rates of major bleeding in patients with glomerular filtration rate ≥80 mL/min.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Internationality; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

During long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, temporary interruptions (TIs) of therapy are common, but the relationship between patient outcomes and TIs has not been well studied. We sought to determine reasons for TI, the characteristics of patients undergoing TI, and the relationship between anticoagulant and outcomes among patients with TI.. In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes, including stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, death, myocardial infarction, and bleeding, were reported in participants who experienced TI (3-30 days) for any reason. The at-risk period for outcomes associated with TI was from TI start to 30 days after resumption of study drug. In 14 236 participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 4692 (33%) experienced TI. Participants with TI were similar to the overall ROCKET AF population in regard to baseline clinical characteristics. Only 6% (n=483) of TI incidences involved bridging therapy. Stroke/systemic embolism rates during the at-risk period were similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.30% versus 0.41% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=0.74 [0.36-1.50]; P=0.40). Risk of major bleeding during the at-risk period was also similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.99% versus 0.79% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=1.26 [0.80-2.00]; P=0.32).. TI of oral anticoagulation is common and is associated with substantial stroke risks and bleeding risks that were similar among patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal management strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring TI of anticoagulation.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age. In the ARISTOTLE trial, apixaban when compared with warfarin reduced the rate of stroke, death, and bleeding. We evaluated these outcomes in relation to patient age.. A total of 18 201 patients with AF and a raised risk of stroke were randomized to warfarin or apixaban 5 mg b.d. with dose reduction to 2.5 mg b.d. or placebo in 831 patients with ≥2 of the following criteria: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or creatinine ≥133 μmol/L. We used Cox models to compare outcomes in relation to patient age during 1.8 years median follow-up. Of the trial population, 30% were <65 years, 39% were 65 to <75, and 31% were ≥75 years. The rates of stroke, all-cause death, and major bleeding were higher in the older age groups (P < 0.001 for all). Apixaban was more effective than warfarin in preventing stroke and reducing mortality across all age groups, and associated with less major bleeding, less total bleeding, and less intracranial haemorrhage regardless of age (P interaction >0.11 for all). Results were also consistent for the 13% of patients ≥80 years. No significant interaction with apixaban dose was found with respect to treatment effect on major outcomes.. The benefits of apixaban vs. warfarin were consistent in patients with AF regardless of age. Owing to the higher risk at older age, the absolute benefits of apixaban were greater in the elderly.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

Idrabiotaparinux, a long-acting inhibitor of factor Xa, was shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism.. To assess non-inferiority for the efficacy of idrabiotaparinux versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Bleeding was also assessed.. This randomized, double-blind trial enrolled patients with electrocardiogram-documented AF. Idrabiotaparinux was administered weekly via subcutaneous injection, and warfarin was administered daily with dose adjustment to maintain the international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0. Each idrabiotaparinux injection was 3 mg for the first 7 weeks, followed by 2 mg thereafter, except in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL min(-1) or aged ≥ 75 years. The patients received 1.5 mg after the first 7 weeks. The efficacy outcome was the composite of all fatal or non-fatal strokes and systemic embolism. The safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding).. The study was terminated prematurely by the sponsor for strategic/commercial, not scientific, reasons, with 39% of the planned number of patients included and an average duration of treatment of 240 days. Of the 1886 idrabiotaparinux recipients, 20 developed stroke or systemic embolism (1.5% per year), whereas this occurred in 22 of the 1887 warfarin patients (1.6% per year, hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.66). The annual incidence of bleeding was 6.1% in the idrabiotaparinux and 10.0% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.81).. If anything, despite its early termination, the idrabiotaparinux regimen studied suggested a comparable efficacy to dose-adjusted warfarin, with a lower bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biotin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This study sought to characterize major bleeding on the basis of the components of the major bleeding definition, to explore major bleeding by location, to define 30-day mortality after a major bleeding event, and to identify factors associated with major bleeding.. Apixaban was shown to reduce the risk of major hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation in the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. All patients who received at least 1 dose of a study drug were included. Major bleeding was defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Factors associated with major hemorrhage were identified using a multivariable Cox model.. The on-treatment safety population included 18,140 patients. The rate of major hemorrhage among patients in the apixaban group was 2.13% per year compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60 to 0.80; p < 0.001). Compared with warfarin, major extracranial hemorrhage associated with apixaban led to reduced hospitalization, medical or surgical intervention, transfusion, or change in antithrombotic therapy. Major hemorrhage followed by mortality within 30 days occurred half as often in apixaban-treated patients than in those receiving warfarin (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.74; p < 0.001). Older age, prior hemorrhage, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, diabetes, lower creatinine clearance, decreased hematocrit, aspirin therapy, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were independently associated with an increased risk.. Apixaban, compared with warfarin, was associated with fewer intracranial hemorrhages, less adverse consequences following extracranial hemorrhage, and a 50% reduction in fatal consequences at 30 days in cases of major hemorrhage.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

There are no data regarding management and outcomes of major bleeding events in patients treated with oral factor Xa inhibitors.. Using data from ROCKET AF, we analysed the management and outcomes of major bleeding overall and according to the randomized treatment. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 779 (5.5%) patients experienced major bleeding at a rate of 3.52 events/100 patient-years with a similar event rate in each arm (n = 395 rivaroxaban vs. n = 384 warfarin). The median number of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) per episode was similar in both arms [2 (25th, 75th: 2, 4) units]. Overall, few transfusions of whole blood (n = 14), platelets (n = 10), or cryoprecipitate (n = 2) were used. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was significantly less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 45 vs. n = 81 units) after adjustment for covariates [odds ratio (OR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.29-0.66); P < 0.0001]. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) were administered less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 4 vs. n = 9). Outcomes after major bleeding, including stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (4.7% rivaroxaban vs. 5.4% warfarin; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.42-1.88) and all-cause death (20.4% rivaroxaban vs. 26.1% warfarin; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.04) were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin (interaction P = 0.51 and 0.11).. Among high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who experienced major bleeding in ROCKET AF, the use of FFP and PCC was less among those allocated rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. However, use of PRBCs and outcomes after bleeding were similar among patients randomized to rivaroxaban or to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Plasma; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Severe atherosclerosis in the aortic arch is associated with a high risk of recurrent vascular events, but the optimal antithrombotic strategy is unclear.. This prospective randomized controlled, open-labeled trial, with blinded end point evaluation (PROBE design) tested superiority of aspirin 75 to 150 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d (A+C) over warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio 2-3) in patients with ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral embolism with plaque in the thoracic aorta>4 mm and no other identified embolic source. The primary end point included cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolism, vascular death, or intracranial hemorrhage. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 month and then every 4 months post randomization.. The trial was stopped after 349 patients were randomized during a period of 8 years and 3 months. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the primary end point occurred in 7.6% (13/172) and 11.3% (20/177) of patients on A+C and on warfarin, respectively (log-rank, P=0.2). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.61; P=0.5). Major hemorrhages including intracranial hemorrhages occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the A+C and warfarin groups, respectively. Vascular deaths occurred in 0 patients in A+C arm compared with 6 (3.4%) patients in the warfarin arm (log-rank, P=0.013). Time in therapeutic range (67% of the time for international normalized ratio 2-3) analysis by tertiles showed no significant differences across groups.. Because of lack of power, this trial was inconclusive and results should be taken as hypothesis generating.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00235248.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Diseases; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening complication of anticoagulation.. We investigated the rate, outcomes, and predictors of ICH in 14 264 patients with atrial fibrillation from Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used.. During 1.94 years (median) of follow-up, 172 patients (1.2%) experienced 175 ICH events at a rate of 0.67% per year. The significant, independent predictors of ICH were race (Asian: hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.94; black: hazard ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.43-7.41), age (1.35; 1.13-1.63 per 10-year increase), reduced serum albumin (1.39; 1.12-1.73 per 0.5 g/dL decrease), reduced platelet count below 210×10(9)/L (1.08; 1.02-1.13 per 10×10(9)/L decrease), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (1.42; 1.02-1.96), and increased diastolic blood pressure (1.17; 1.01-1.36 per 10 mm Hg increase). Predictors of a reduced risk of ICH were randomization to rivaroxaban (0.60; 0.44-0.82) and history of congestive heart failure (0.65; 0.47-0.89). The ability of the model to discriminate individuals with and without ICH was good (C-index, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.73).. Among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulation, the risk of ICH was higher among Asians, blacks, the elderly, and in those with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, increased diastolic blood pressure, and reduced platelet count or serum albumin at baseline. The risk of ICH was significantly lower in patients with heart failure and in those who were randomized to rivaroxaban instead of warfarin. The external validity of these findings requires testing in other atrial fibrillation populations.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Black People; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Periprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events are worrisome complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The periprocedural anticoagulation management could play a role in the incidence of these complications. Although ablation procedures performed without warfarin discontinuation seem to be associated with lower thromboembolic risk, no randomized study exists.. This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study assessing the role of continuous warfarin therapy in preventing periprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Patients with CHADS2 score ≥1 were included. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the off-warfarin or on-warfarin arm. The incidence of thromboembolic events in the 48 hours after ablation was the primary end point of the study. The study enrolled 1584 patients: 790 assigned to discontinue warfarin (group 1) and 794 assigned to continuous warfarin (group 2). No statistical difference in baseline characteristics was observed. There were 39 thromboembolic events (3.7% strokes [n=29] and 1.3% transient ischemic attacks [n=10]) in group 1: two events (0.87%) in patients with paroxysmal AF, 4 (2.3%) in patients with persistent AF, and 33 (8.5%) in patients with long-standing persistent AF. Only 2 strokes (0.25%) in patients with long-standing persistent AF were observed in group 2 (P<0.001). Warfarin discontinuation emerged as a strong predictor of periprocedural thromboembolism (odds ratio, 13; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-55.6; P<0.001).. This is the first randomized study showing that performing catheter ablation of AF without warfarin discontinuation reduces the occurrence of periprocedural stroke and minor bleeding complications compared with bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01006876.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Period; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

To compare the therapeutic warfarin and aspirin efficacies for treatments of atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated with stable coronary heart disease particularly in older Chinese patients.. In our prospective study 101 patients with AF and stable coronary heart disease older than 80 years were randomized into two groups. One group (n = 51) basically received 1.25 mg/day warfarin per os, followed by addition of 0.5 - 1.0 mg/day from day 3 - 5 if the international normalized ratio (INR) was initially < 1.5 and in order to achieve a maintained INR between 1.6 and 2.5 (warfarin group). The second group (n = 50) received 100 mg aspirin per day (control group). All patients were medicated and monitored for a period of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and the composite secondary endpoint was non-fatal myocardial infarction and all causes of death. For safety evaluation, the hemorrhage rates were recorded.. The warfarin medication was superior regarding the overall occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism as well as non-fatal myocardial infarction and all causes of death outcomes compared to aspirin administration during the 2 years of medication (17.6% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.03), while there was no significant difference of mild (5 vs. 4), severe (2 vs. 1), and fatal (1 vs. 1) hemorrhage incidences between the warfarin and aspirin groups (p > 0.05).. Warfarin was found to be more efficacious than aspirin for an anticoagulation therapy of older Chinese patients with AF and stable coronary heart disease.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; China; Coronary Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a standard quality measure of the use of warfarin. We assessed the relative effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin at the level of trial center TTR (cTTR) since such analysis preserves randomized comparisons.. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, without exclusion of international normalized ratio (INR) values performed during warfarin initiation. Measurements during warfarin interruptions >7 days were excluded. INRs were performed via standardized finger-stick point-of-care devices at least every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint (stroke or non-central nervous system embolism) was examined by quartiles of cTTR and by cTTR as a continuous function. Centers with the highest cTTRs by quartile had lower-risk patients as reflected by lower CHADS2 scores (P<0.0001) and a lower prevalence of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (P<0.0001). Sites with higher cTTR were predominantly from North America and Western Europe. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on the primary endpoint was consistent across a wide range of cTTRs (P value for interaction=0.71). The hazard of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding increased with cTTR (P for interaction=0.001), however, the estimated reduction by rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was preserved across a wide range of threshold cTTR values.. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism is consistent regardless of cTTR.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; North America; Point-of-Care Systems; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) trial, rivaroxaban was noninferior to dose-adjusted warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at moderate to high stroke risk. Because of differences in patient demographics, epidemiology, and stroke risk management in East Asia, outcomes and relative effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin were assessed to determine consistency among East Asians versus other ROCKET AF participants.. Baseline demographics and interaction of treatment effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin among patients within East Asia and outside were assessed.. A total of 932 (6.5%) ROCKET AF participants resided in East Asia. At baseline, East Asians had lower weight, creatinine clearance, and prior vitamin K antagonist use; higher prevalence of prior stroke; and less congestive heart failure and prior myocardial infarction than other participants. Despite higher absolute event rates for efficacy and safety outcomes in East Asians, the relative efficacy of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily; 15 mg once daily for creatinine clearance of 30-49 mL/min) versus warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy end point (stroke/systemic embolism) was consistent among East Asians and non-East Asians (interaction P=0.666). Relative event rates for the major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin were consistent among East Asians and non-East Asians (interaction P=0.867).. Observed relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin were similar among patients within and outside East Asia. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily, is an alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in East Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is common in elderly patients, who face an elevated risk of stroke but difficulty sustaining warfarin treatment. The oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). This prespecified secondary analysis compares outcomes in older and younger patients.. There were 6229 patients (44%) aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation and ≥2 stroke risk factors randomized to warfarin (target international normalized ratio=2.0-3.0) or rivaroxaban (20 mg daily; 15 mg if creatinine clearance <50 mL/min), double blind. The primary end point was stroke and systemic embolism by intention to treat. Over 10 866 patient-years, older participants had more primary events (2.57% versus 2.05%/100 patient-years; P=0.0068) and major bleeding (4.63% versus 2.74%/100 patient-years; P<0.0001). Stroke/systemic embolism rates were consistent among older (2.29% rivaroxaban versus 2.85% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.02) and younger patients (2.00% versus 2.10%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.19; interaction P=0.313), as were major bleeding rates (≥75 years: 4.86% rivaroxaban versus 4.40% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.34; <75 years: 2.69% versus 2.79%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.19; interaction P=0.336). Hemorrhagic stroke rates were similar in both age groups; there was no interaction between age and rivaroxaban response.. Elderly patients had higher stroke and major bleeding rates than younger patients, but the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin did not differ with age, supporting rivaroxaban as an alternative for the elderly.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

D-dimer is related to adverse outcomes in arterial and venous thromboembolic diseases.. To evaluate the predictive value of D-dimer level for stroke, other cardiovascular events, and bleeds, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with oral anticoagulation with apixaban or warfarin; and to evaluate the relationship between the D-dimer levels at baseline and the treatment effect of apixaban vs. warfarin.. In the ARISTOTLE trial, 18 201 patients with AF were randomized to apixaban or warfarin. D-dimer was analyzed in 14 878 patients at randomization. The cohort was separated into two groups; not receiving vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment and receiving VKA treatment at randomization.. Higher D-dimer levels were associated with increased frequencies of stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR] [Q4 vs. Q1] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.59, P = 0.003), death (HR [Q4 vs. Q1] 4.04, 95% CI 3.06-5.33) and major bleeding (HR [Q4 vs. Q1] 2.47, 95% CI 1.77-3.45, P < 0.0001) in the no-VKA group. Similar results were obtained in the on-VKA group. Adding D-dimer level to the CHADS2 score improved the C-index from 0.646 to 0.655 for stroke or systemic embolism, and from 0.598 to 0.662 for death, in the no-VKA group. D-dimer level improved the HAS-BLED score for prediction of major bleeds, with an increase in the C-index from 0.610 to 0.641. There were no significant interactions between efficacy and safety of study treatment and D-dimer level.. In anticoagulated patients with AF, the level of D-dimer is related to the risk of stroke, death, and bleeding, and adds to the predictive value of clinical risk scores. The benefits of apixaban were consistent, regardless of the baseline D-dimer level.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The once-daily oral factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban, is as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism while decreasing bleeding in a phase III trial of patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate-high stroke risk. Limited data regarding cerebrovascular events with edoxaban were reported previously.. We analyzed the subtypes of cerebrovascular events in 21 105 patients participating in Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) comparing outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin versus 2 edoxaban regimens (high dose, low dose). The primary end point for this prespecified analysis of cerebrovascular events was all stroke (ischemic plus hemorrhagic), defined as an abrupt onset of focal neurological deficit because of infarction or bleeding with symptoms lasting ≥24 hours or fatal in <24 hours. Independent stroke neurologists unaware of treatment adjudicated all cerebrovascular events.. Patients randomized to high-dose edoxaban had fewer strokes on-treatment (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.98) than warfarin (median time-in-therapeutic range, 68.4%); patients in the low-dose edoxaban group had similar rates (hazard ratio, 1.10 versus warfarin; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.32). Rates of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were similar with high-dose edoxaban (1.76% per year) and warfarin (1.73% per year; P=0.81), but more frequent with low-dose edoxaban (2.48% per year; P<0.001). Both edoxaban regimens significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke and other subtypes of intracranial bleeds.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, once-daily edoxaban was as effective as warfarin in preventing all strokes, with significant reductions in various subtypes of intracranial bleeding. Ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were similar with high-dose edoxaban and warfarin, whereas low-dose edoxaban was less effective than warfarin.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial that evaluated patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention, but a periprocedural safety hazard was identified.. The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of LAA occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF compared with long-term warfarin therapy.. This randomized trial further assessed the efficacy and safety of the Watchman device. Patients with NVAF who had a CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes mellitus, and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack) score ≥2 or 1 and another risk factor were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to undergo LAA occlusion and subsequent discontinuation of warfarin (intervention group, n = 269) or receive chronic warfarin therapy (control group, n = 138). Two efficacy and 1 safety coprimary endpoints were assessed.. At 18 months, the rate of the first coprimary efficacy endpoint (composite of stroke, systemic embolism [SE], and cardiovascular/unexplained death) was 0.064 in the device group versus 0.063 in the control group (rate ratio 1.07 [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.57 to 1.89]) and did not achieve the prespecified criteria noninferiority (upper boundary of 95% CrI ≥1.75). The rate for the second coprimary efficacy endpoint (stroke or SE >7 days' postrandomization) was 0.0253 versus 0.0200 (risk difference 0.0053 [95% CrI: -0.0190 to 0.0273]), achieving noninferiority. Early safety events occurred in 2.2% of the Watchman arm, significantly lower than in PROTECT AF, satisfying the pre-specified safety performance goal. Using a broader, more inclusive definition of adverse effects, these still were lower in PREVAIL (Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trial than in PROTECT AF (4.2% vs. 8.7%; p = 0.004). Pericardial effusions requiring surgical repair decreased from 1.6% to 0.4% (p = 0.027), and those requiring pericardiocentesis decreased from 2.9% to 1.5% (p = 0.36), although the number of events was small.. In this trial, LAA occlusion was noninferior to warfarin for ischemic stroke prevention or SE >7 days' post-procedure. Although noninferiority was not achieved for overall efficacy, event rates were low and numerically comparable in both arms. Procedural safety has significantly improved. This trial provides additional data that LAA occlusion is a reasonable alternative to warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF who do not have an absolute contraindication to short-term warfarin therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with significant valvular disease (SVD) in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) trial.. ROCKET AF excluded patients with mitral stenosis or artificial valve prostheses. We used Cox regression to adjust comparisons for potential confounders. Among 14 171 patients, 2003 (14.1%) had SVD; they were older and had more comorbidities than patients without SVD. The rate of stroke or systemic embolism with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was consistent among patients with SVD [2.01 vs. 2.43%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.27] and without SVD (1.96 vs. 2.22%; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P = 0.76). However, rates of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were higher in patients with SVD (19.8% rivaroxaban vs. 16.8% warfarin; HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49) vs. those without (14.2% rivaroxaban vs. 14.1% warfarin; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.10; interaction P = 0.034), even when controlling for risk factors and potential confounders. In intracranial haemorrhage, there was no interaction between patients with and without SVD where the overall rate was lower among those randomized to rivaroxaban.. Many patients with 'non-valvular atrial fibrillation' have significant valve lesions. Their risk of stroke is similar to that of patients without SVD after controlling for stroke risk factors. Efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was similar in patients with and without SVD; however, the observed risk of bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban in patients with SVD but was the same among those without SVD. Atrial fibrillation patients with and without SVD experience the same stroke-preventive benefit of oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The perceived risk of serious bleeding is an obstacle to the use of oral anticoagulation in East Asia. The efficacy and safety of apixaban in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation are unknown.. ARISTOTLE included 18,201 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation randomized to apixaban 5mg twice daily or warfarin. The efficacy and safety of apixaban and warfarin among patients recruited from East Asia (n = 1,993) were compared with those recruited from outside East Asia (n = 16,208).. Compared with warfarin, apixaban resulted in a consistent reduction in stroke or systemic embolism in East Asian (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.50-1.10) and non-East Asian (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99) patients (interaction P = .70). Consistent benefits of apixaban over warfarin were also seen for major bleeding in East Asian (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.80) and non-East Asian (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83) patients (interaction P = .17). There was a greater reduction in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding with apixaban compared with warfarin in East Asian (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.67) than in non-East Asian (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) patients (interaction P = .03). Numerically higher rates of intracranial bleeding were seen in East Asian patients with warfarin but not with apixaban.. Apixaban resulted in similar reductions in stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding and greater reductions in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in patients from East Asia. Warfarin is associated with more intracranial bleeding, particularly in patients from East Asia.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

WARCEF randomized 2,305 patients in sinus rhythm with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% to warfarin (INR 2.0-3.5) or aspirin 325 mg. Warfarin reduced the incident ischemic stroke (IIS) hazard rate by 48% over aspirin in a secondary analysis. The IIS rate in heart failure (HF) is too low to warrant routine anticoagulation but epidemiologic studies show that prior stroke increases the stroke risk in HF. In this study, we explore IIS rates in WARCEF patients with and without baseline stroke to look for risk factors for IIS and determine if a subgroup with an IIS rate high enough to give a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction can be identified.. We compared potential stroke risk factors between patients with baseline stroke and those without using the exact conditional score test for Poisson variables. We looked for risk factors for IIS, by comparing IIS rates between different risk factors. For EF we tried cut-off points of 10, 15 and 20%. The cut-off point 15% was used as it was the highest EF that was associated with a significant increase in IIS rate. IIS and EF strata were balanced as to warfarin/aspirin assignment by the stratified randomized design. A multiple Poisson regression examined the simultaneous effects of all risk factors on IIS rate. IIS rates per hundred patient years (/100 PY) were calculated in patient groups with significant risk factors. Missing values were assigned the modal value.. Twenty of 248 (8.1%) patients with baseline stroke and 64 of 2,048 (3.1%) without had IIS. IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke (2.37/100 PY) was greater than patients without (0.89/100 PY) (rate ratio 2.68, p < 0.001). Fourteen of 219 (6.4%) patients with ejection fraction (EF) <15% and 70 of 2,079 (3.4%) with EF ≥ 15% had IIS. In the multiple regression analysis stroke at baseline (p < 0.001) and EF <15% vs. ≥ 15% (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of IIS. IIS rate was 2.04/100 PY in patients with EF <15% and 0.95/100 PY in patients with EF ≥ 15% (p = 0.009). IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke and reduced EF was 5.88/100 PY with EF <15% decreasing to 2.62/100 PY with EF <30%.. In a WARCEF exploratory analysis, prior stroke and EF <15% were risk factors for IIS. Further research is needed to determine if a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction is obtainable with warfarin in HF patients with prior stroke and reduced EF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Warfarin

Amiodarone is an effective medication in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF), but it interferes with the metabolism of warfarin.. This study sought to examine the association of major thrombotic clinical events and bleeding with the use of amiodarone in the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. Baseline characteristics of patients who received amiodarone at randomization were compared with those who did not receive amiodarone. The interaction between randomized treatment and amiodarone was tested using a Cox model, with main effects for randomized treatment and amiodarone and their interaction. Matching on the basis of a propensity score was used to compare patients who received and who did not receive amiodarone at the time of randomization.. In ARISTOTLE, 2,051 (11.4%) patients received amiodarone at randomization. Patients on warfarin and amiodarone had time in the therapeutic range that was lower than patients not on amiodarone (56.5% vs. 63.0%; p < 0.0001). More amiodarone-treated patients had a stroke or a systemic embolism (1.58%/year vs. 1.19%/year; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 2.10; p = 0.0322). Overall mortality and major bleeding rates were elevated, but were not significantly different in amiodarone-treated patients and patients not on amiodarone. When comparing apixaban with warfarin, patients who received amiodarone had a stroke or a systemic embolism rate of 1.24%/year versus 1.85%/year (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.15), death of 4.15%/year versus 5.65%/year (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.98), and major bleeding of 1.86%/year versus 3.06%/year (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.96). In patients who did not receive amiodarone, the stroke or systemic embolism rate was 1.29%/year versus 1.57%/year (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.00), death was 3.43%/year versus 3.68%/year (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.05), and major bleeding was 2.18%/year versus 3.03%/year (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.84). The interaction p values for amiodarone use by apixaban treatment effects were not significant.. Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased stroke and systemic embolism risk and a lower time in the therapeutic range when used with warfarin. Apixaban consistently reduced the rate of stroke and systemic embolism, death, and major bleeding compared with warfarin in amiodarone-treated patients and patients who were not on amiodarone.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brazil; Cause of Death; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Ontario; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Using data from ARISTOTLE, we describe the periprocedural management of anticoagulation and rates of subsequent clinical outcomes among patients chronically anticoagulated with warfarin or apixaban. We recorded whether (and for how long) anticoagulant therapy was interrupted preprocedure, whether bridging therapy was used, and the proportion of patients who experienced important clinical outcomes during the 30 days postprocedure. Of 10 674 procedures performed during follow-up in 5924 patients, 9260 were included in this analysis. Anticoagulant treatment was not interrupted preprocedure 37.5% of the time. During the 30 days postprocedure, stroke or systemic embolism occurred after 16/4624 (0.35%) procedures among apixaban-treated patients and 26/4530 (0.57%) procedures among warfarin-treated patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.601; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.322-1.120). Major bleeding occurred in 74/4560 (1.62%) procedures in the apixaban arm and 86/4454 (1.93%) in the warfarin arm (OR 0.846; 95% CI 0.614-1.166). The risk of death was similar with apixaban (54/4624 [1.17%]) and warfarin (49/4530 [1.08%]) (OR 1.082; 95% CI 0.733-1.598). Among patients in ARISTOTLE, the 30-day postprocedure stroke, death, and major bleeding rates were low and similar in apixaban- and warfarin-treated patients, regardless of whether anticoagulation was stopped beforehand. Our findings suggest that many patients on chronic anticoagulation can safely undergo procedures; some will not require a preprocedure interruption of anticoagulation. ARISTOTLE was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00412984.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

While effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), warfarin is limited by a narrow therapeutic profile, a need for lifelong coagulation monitoring, and multiple drug and diet interactions.. To determine whether a local strategy of mechanical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure was noninferior to warfarin.. PROTECT AF was a multicenter, randomized (2:1), unblinded, Bayesian-designed study conducted at 59 hospitals of 707 patients with nonvalvular AF and at least 1 additional stroke risk factor (CHADS2 score ≥1). Enrollment occurred between February 2005 and June 2008 and included 4-year follow-up through October 2012. Noninferiority required a posterior probability greater than 97.5% and superiority a probability of 95% or greater; the noninferiority margin was a rate ratio of 2.0 comparing event rates between treatment groups.. Left atrial appendage closure with the device (n = 463) or warfarin (n = 244; target international normalized ratio, 2-3).. A composite efficacy end point including stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular/unexplained death, analyzed by intention-to-treat.. At a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.8 (1.7) years (2621 patient-years), there were 39 events among 463 patients (8.4%) in the device group for a primary event rate of 2.3 events per 100 patient-years, compared with 34 events among 244 patients (13.9%) for a primary event rate of 3.8 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin (rate ratio, 0.60; 95% credible interval, 0.41-1.05), meeting prespecified criteria for both noninferiority (posterior probability, >99.9%) and superiority (posterior probability, 96.0%). Patients in the device group demonstrated lower rates of both cardiovascular mortality (1.0 events per 100 patient-years for the device group [17/463 patients, 3.7%] vs 2.4 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin [22/244 patients, 9.0%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75; P = .005) and all-cause mortality (3.2 events per 100 patient-years for the device group [57/466 patients, 12.3%] vs 4.8 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin [44/244 patients, 18.0%]; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = .04).. After 3.8 years of follow-up among patients with nonvalvular AF at elevated risk for stroke, percutaneous LAA closure met criteria for both noninferiority and superiority, compared with warfarin, for preventing the combined outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, as well as superiority for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129545.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiovascular Diseases; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Implantation; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of stroke. Betrixaban is a novel oral factor Xa inhibitor administered once daily, mostly excreted unchanged in the bile and with low (17%) renal excretion.. Patients with AF and more than one risk factor for stroke were randomized to one of three blinded doses of betrixaban (40, 60, or 80 mg once daily) or unblinded warfarin, adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. The primary outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The mean follow-up was 147 days. Among 508 patients randomized, the mean CHADS2 score was 2.2; 87% of patients had previously received vitamin K antagonist therapy. The time in therapeutic range on warfarin was 63.4%. There were one, five, five, and seven patients with a primary outcome on betrixaban 40, 60, 80 mg daily, or warfarin, respectively. The rate of the primary outcome was lowest on betrixaban 40 mg (hazard ratio compared with warfarin = 0.14, exact stratified log-rank P-value 0.04, unadjusted for multiple testing). Rates of the primary outcome with betrixaban 60 or 80 mg were more similar to those of wafarin. Two ischaemic strokes occurred, one each on betrixaban 60 and 80 mg daily. There were two vascular deaths, one each on betrixaban 40 mg and warfarin. Betrixaban was associated with higher rates of diarrhoea than warfarin.. Betrixaban was well tolerated and had similar or lower rates of bleeding compared with well-controlled warfarin in patients with AF at risk for stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study sought to assess quality of life parameters in a subset of patients enrolled in the PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. The PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial demonstrated that in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism) score ≥1, a left atrial appendage closure device is noninferior to long-term warfarin for stroke prevention. Given this equivalency, quality of life (QOL) indicators are an important metric for evaluating these 2 different strategies.. QOL using the Short-Form 12 Health Survey, version 2, measurement tool was obtained at baseline and 12 months in a subset of 547 patients in the PROTECT AF trial (361 device and 186 warfarin patients). The analysis cohort consisted of patients for whom either paired quality of life data were available after 12 months of follow-up or for patients who died.. With the device, the total physical score improved in 34.9% and was unchanged in 29.9% versus warfarin in whom 24.7% were improved and 31.7% were unchanged (p = 0.01). Mental health improvement occurred in 33.0% of the device group versus 22.6% in the warfarin group (p = 0.06). There was a significant improvement in QOL in patients randomized to device for total physical score, physical function, and in physical role limitation compared to control. There were significant differences in the change in total physical score among warfarin naive and not-warfarin naive subgroups in the device group compared to control, but larger gains were seen with the warfarin naive subgroup with a 12-month change of 1.3 ± 8.8 versus -3.6 ± 6.7 (p = 0.0004) device compared to warfarin.. Patients with nonvalvular AF at risk for stroke treated with left atrial appendage closure have favorable QOL changes at 12 months versus patients treated with warfarin. (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [WATCHMAN PROTECT]; NCT00129545).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Constriction, Pathologic; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Prevention; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study sought to investigate the outcomes following cardioversion or catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with warfarin or rivaroxaban.. There are limited data on outcomes following cardioversion or catheter ablation in AF patients treated with factor Xa inhibitors.. We compared the incidence of electrical cardioversion (ECV), pharmacologic cardioversion (PCV), or AF ablation and subsequent outcomes in patients in a post hoc analysis of the ROCKET AF (Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 143 patients underwent ECV, 142 underwent PCV, and 79 underwent catheter ablation. The overall incidence of ECV, PCV, or AF ablation was 1.45 per 100 patient-years (n = 321; 1.44 [n = 161] in the warfarin arm, 1.46 [n = 160] in the rivaroxaban arm). The crude rates of stroke and death increased in the first 30 days after cardioversion or ablation. After adjustment for baseline differences, the long-term incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 3.11), cardiovascular death (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.69 to 3.55), and death from all causes (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.90 to 3.42) were not different before and after cardioversion or AF ablation. Hospitalization increased after cardioversion or AF ablation (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.68), but there was no evidence of a differential effect by randomized treatment (p value for interaction = 0.58). The incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (1.88% vs. 1.86%) and death (1.88% vs. 3.73%) were similar in the rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated groups.. Despite an increase in hospitalization, there were no differences in long-term stroke rates or survival following cardioversion or AF ablation. Outcomes were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation [ROCKET AF]; NCT00403767).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Multivariate Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy remains the most common method of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a widely cited measure of the quality of VKA therapy. We sought to identify factors associated with TTR in a large, international clinical trial.. TTR (international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 to 3.0) was determined using standard linear interpolation in patients randomized to warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. Factors associated with TTR at the individual patient level (i-TTR) were determined via multivariable linear regression. Among 6983 patients taking warfarin, recruited from 45 countries grouped into 7 regions, the mean i-TTR was 55.2% (SD 21.3%) and the median i-TTR was 57.9% (interquartile range 43.0% to 70.6%). The mean time with INR <2 was 29.1% and the mean time with an INR >3 was 15.7%. While multiple clinical features were associated with i-TTR, dominant determinants were previous warfarin use (mean i-TTR of 61.1% for warfarin-experienced versus 47.4% in VKA-naïve patients) and geographic region where patients were managed (mean i-TTR varied from 64.1% to 35.9%). These effects persisted in multivariable analysis. Regions with the lowest i-TTRs had INR distributions shifted toward lower INR values and had longer inter-INR test intervals.. Independent of patient clinical features, the regional location of medical care is a dominant determinant of variation in i-TTR in global studies of warfarin. Regional differences in mean i-TTR are heavily influenced by subtherapeutic INR values and are associated with reduced frequency of INR testing.. URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Europe; Female; Healthcare Disparities; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Linear Models; Male; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; North America; Predictive Value of Tests; Residence Characteristics; Rivaroxaban; South Africa; South America; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study sought to assess the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) enrolled in the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation) trial, and the treatment effect of apixaban according to NT-proBNP levels.. Natriuretic peptides are associated with mortality and cardiovascular events in several cardiac diseases.. In the ARISTOTLE trial, 18,201 patients with AF were randomized to apixaban or warfarin. Plasma samples at randomization were available from 14,892 patients. The association between NT-proBNP concentrations and clinical outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models, after adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors.. Quartiles of NT-proBNP were: Q1, ≤363 ng/l; Q2, 364 to 713 ng/l; Q3, 714 to 1,250 ng/l; and Q4, >1,250 ng/l. During 1.9 years, the annual rates of stroke or systemic embolism ranged from 0.74% in the bottom NT-proBNP quartile to 2.21% in the top quartile, an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62 to 3.40; p < 0.0001). Annual rates of cardiac death ranged from 0.86% in Q1 to 4.14% in Q4, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.50 (95% CI: 1.81 to 3.45; p < 0.0001). Adding NT-proBNP levels to the CHA2DS2VASc score improved C-statistics from 0.62 to 0.65 (p = 0.0009) for stroke or systemic embolism and from 0.59 to 0.69 for cardiac death (p < 0.0001). Apixaban reduced stroke, mortality, and bleeding regardless of the NT-proBNP level.. NT-proBNP levels are often elevated in AF and independently associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality. NT-proBNP improves risk stratification beyond the CHA2DS2VASc score and might be a novel tool for improved stroke prediction in AF. The efficacy of apixaban compared with warfarin is independent of the NT-proBNP level. (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]; NCT00412984).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Warfarin

It is uncertain whether the benefit from apixaban varies by type and duration of atrial fibrillation (AF).. A total of 18 201 patients with AF [2786 (15.3%) with paroxysmal and 15 412 (84.7%) with persistent or permanent] were randomized to apixaban or warfarin. In this pre-specified secondary analysis, we compared outcomes and treatment effect of apixaban vs. warfarin by AF type and duration. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The secondary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality. There was a consistent reduction in stroke or systemic embolism (P for interaction = 0.71), all-cause mortality (P for interaction = 0.75), and major bleeding (P for interaction = 0.50) with apixaban compared with warfarin for both AF types. Apixaban was superior to warfarin in all studied endpoints, regardless of AF duration at study entry (P for all interactions >0.13). The rate of stroke or systemic embolism was significantly higher in patients with persistent or permanent AF than patients with paroxysmal AF (1.52 vs. 0.98%; P = 0.003, adjusted P = 0.015). There was also a trend towards higher mortality in patients with persistent or permanent AF (3.90 vs. 2.81%; P = 0.0002, adjusted P = 0.066).. The risks of stroke, mortality, and major bleeding were lower with apixaban than warfarin regardless of AF type and duration. Although the risk of stroke or systemic embolism was lower in paroxysmal than persistent or permanent AF, apixaban is an attractive alternative to warfarin in patients with AF and at least one other risk factor for stroke, regardless of the type or duration of AF.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cause of Death; Electric Countershock; Electrocardiography; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial, apixaban compared with warfarin reduced stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and mortality. We evaluated treatment effects in relation to 2 predictions of time in therapeutic range (TTR).. The trial randomized 18 201 patients with atrial fibrillation to apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin for at least 12 months. For each patient, a center average TTR was estimated with the use of a linear mixed model on the basis of the real TTRs in its warfarin-treated patients, with a fixed effect for country and random effect for center. For each patient, an individual TTR was also predicted with the use of a linear mixed effects model including patient characteristics as well. Median center average TTR was 66% (interquartile limits, 61% and 71%). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and mortality were consistently lower with apixaban than with warfarin across center average TTR and individual TTR quartiles. In the lowest and highest center average TTR quartiles, hazard ratios for stroke or systemic embolism were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.57-1.35) (Pinteraction=0.078), for mortality were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74-1.13) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71-1.16) (Pinteraction=0.34), and for major bleeding were 0.50 (95% CI, 0.36-0.70) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.58-0.97) (Pinteraction=0.095), respectively. Similar results were seen for quartiles of individual TTR.. The benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin for stroke or systemic embolism, bleeding, and mortality appear similar across the range of centers' and patients' predicted quality of international normalized ratio control.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

When oral anticoagulation with adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is used, the quality of anticoagulation control (as reflected by the time in therapeutic range [TTR] of the international normalized ratio [INR]) is an important determinant of thromboembolism and bleeding. Our objective was to derive a validated scheme using patient-related clinical parameters to assess the likelihood of poor INR control among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on VKA therapy.. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial population was randomly divided into derivation and internal validation cohorts using a 1:1 ratio. We used linear regression analysis to detect the clinical factors associated with TTR and binary logistic regression to evaluate the predictive performance of a model incorporating these factors for different cutoff values of TTR. The derived model was validated externally in a cohort of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy who were recruited prospectively.. In the linear regression model, nine variables emerged as independent predictors of TTR: female sex (P < .0001), age < 50 years (P < .0001), age 50 to 60 years (P = .02), ethnic minority status (P < .0001), smoking (P = .03), more than two comorbidities (P < .0001), and being treated with a β-blocker (P = .02), verapamil (P = .02), or, inversely, with amiodarone (P = .05). We incorporated these factors into a simple clinical prediction scheme with the acronym SAMe-TT₂R (sex female, age < 60 years, medical history [more than two comorbidities], treatment [interacting drugs, eg, amiodarone for rhythm control], tobacco use [doubled], race [doubled]). The score demonstrated good discrimination performance in both the internal and external validation cohorts (c-index, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.795; and c-index, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.57-0.82, respectively).. Common clinical and demographic factors can influence the quality of oral anticoagulation. We incorporated these factors into a simple score (SAMe-TT₂R₂) that can predict poor INR control and aid decision-making by identifying those patients with AF who would do well on VKA (SAMe-TT₂R₂ score = 0-1), or conversely, those who require additional interventions to achieve acceptable anticoagulation control (SAMe-TT₂R₂ score ≥ 2).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Intracranial hemorrhage rates are higher in Asians than non-Asians, especially in patients receiving warfarin. This randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy subgroup analysis assessed dabigatran etexilate (DE) and warfarin effects on stroke and bleeding rates in patients from Asian and non-Asian countries.. There were 2782 patients (15%) from 10 Asian countries and 15 331 patients from 34 non-Asian countries. A Cox regression model, with terms for treatment, region, and their interaction was used.. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism in Asians were 3.06% per year on warfarin, 2.50% per year on DE 110 mg BID (DE 110), and 1.39% per year on DE 150 mg BID (DE 150); in non-Asians, the rates were 1.48%, 1.37%, and 1.06% per year with no significant treatment-by-region interactions. Hemorrhagic stroke on warfarin occurred more often in Asians than non-Asians (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.7; P=0.007), with significant reductions for DE compared with warfarin in both Asian (DE 110 versus warfarin HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66 and DE 150 versus warfarin HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.77) and non-Asian (DE 110 versus warfarin HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.72 and DE 150 versus warfarin HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.58) patients. Major bleeding rates in Asians were significantly lower on DE (both doses) than warfarin (warfarin 3.82% per year, DE 110 2.22% per year, and DE 150 2.17% per year).. Hemorrhagic stroke rates were higher on warfarin in Asians versus non-Asians, despite similar blood pressure, younger age, and lower international normalized ratio values. Hemorrhagic strokes were significantly reduced by DE in both Asians and non-Asians. DE benefits were consistent across Asian and non-Asian subgroups.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate the previously reported excess of thromboembolic events during the 30 days after the end of study (EOS) visit when participants transitioned from blinded therapy to open-label vitamin K antagonist.. At the EOS visit, open-label vitamin K antagonist was recommended, and the international normalized ratio (INR) was not to be measured until 3 days later to preserve blinding. We analyzed transition strategies, clinical outcomes, and INR values. Event rates are per 100 patient-years. A total of 9248 (65%) participants were taking study drug at EOS, and, between days 3 and 30, an excess of stroke and systemic embolic events were observed in participants assigned to rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban 22 events, event rate 6.42; warfarin 6 events, event rate 1.73; hazard ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-9.16; P=0.0044). No INR values were reported for ≈5% of participants transitioned to warfarin. By 30 days after EOS, 83% of the warfarin group and 52% of the rivaroxaban group had ≥1 therapeutic INR value. Median time to first therapeutic INR was 3 days in the warfarin group and 13 days in the rivaroxaban group.. The excess of events at EOS was likely because of a period of inadequate anticoagulation in rivaroxaban participants switched to vitamin K antagonist therapy. If transition from rivaroxaban to vitamin K antagonist is needed, timely monitoring and careful dosing should be used to ensure consistent and adequate anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Protocols; Continuity of Patient Care; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Embolism; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Proportional Hazards Models; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This study sought to compare the net clinical benefit of dabigatran 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid with that of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In patients with AF, dabigatran 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid are associated with similar rates of death. However, the higher dose reduces ischemic stroke and increases bleeding compared with the lower dose. Therefore, there is uncertainty about how to evaluate the overall benefit of the 2 doses.. In 18,113 AF patients in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy) trial, we used a previously developed method for integrating ischemic and bleeding events as "ischemic stroke equivalents" in order to compare a weighted benefit of 2 doses of dabigatran with each other, and with that of warfarin.. Compared with warfarin, there was a significant decrease in ischemic stroke equivalents with both dabigatran doses: -0.92 per 100 patient years (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.74 to -0.21, p = 0.02) with dabigatran 110 mg bid and -1.08 (95% CI: -1.86 to -0.34, p = 0.01) with dabigatran 150 mg bid. There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke equivalents between the 2 doses: -0.16 (95% CI: -0.80 to 0.43) comparing dabigatran 150 mg bid with 110 bid. When including death in the weighted benefit calculations, the results were similar.. On a group level both doses of dabigatran as compared with warfarin have similar benefits when considering a weighted estimate including both efficacy and safety. The similar overall benefits of the 2 doses of dabigatran versus warfarin support individualizing the dose based on patient characteristics and physician and patient preferences. (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy [RE-LY] With Dabigatran Etexilate; NCT00262600).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation), a large randomized, clinical trial, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.. To determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Prespecified subgroup analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767).. Global.. 14,264 persons with atrial fibrillation.. Interaction of the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism among VKA-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Overall, 7897 (55.4%) patients were VKA-experienced and 6367 (44.6%) were VKA-naive. The effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism was consistent: Rates per 100 patient-years of follow-up were 2.32 versus 2.87 for VKA-naive patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03]) and 1.98 versus 2.09 for VKA-experienced patients (HR, 0.94 [CI, 0.75 to 1.18]; interaction P = 0.36). During the first 7 days, rivaroxaban was associated with more bleeding than warfarin (HR in VKA-naive patients, 5.83 [CI, 3.25 to 10.44], and in VKA-experienced patients, 6.66 [CI, 3.83 to 11.58]; interaction P = 0.53). After 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding than warfarin in VKA-naive patients (HR, 0.84 [CI, 0.74 to 0.95]) and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients (HR, 1.06 [CI, 0.96 to 1.17]; interaction P = 0.003).. The trial was not designed to detect differences in these subgroups.. The efficacy of rivaroxaban in VKA-experienced and VKA-naive patients was similar to that of the overall trial. There were more bleeding events within 7 days of study drug initiation with rivaroxaban, but after 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding in VKA-naive patients and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients. This information may be useful to clinicians considering a transition to rivaroxaban for patients receiving VKA therapy.. Johnson & Johnson and Bayer HealthCare.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

We evaluated the effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with previous symptomatic heart failure (HF) in the RE-LY trial.. RE-LY compared two fixed and blinded doses of dabigatran (110 and 150 mg twice daily) with open-label warfarin in 18 113 patients with AF at increased risk for stroke. Among 4904 patients with HF, annual rates of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) were 1.92% for patients on warfarin compared with 1.90% for dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.42] and 1.44% for dabigatran 150 mg (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51-1.10). Annual rates of major bleeding were 3.90% for the group on warfarin, compared with 3.26% for dabigatran 110 mg (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.09) and 3.10% for dabigatran 150 mg (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.03). Rates of intracranial bleeding were significantly lower for both dabigatran dosages compared with warfarin in patients with HF (dabigatran 110 mg vs. warfarin, HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.80; dabigatran 150 mg vs. warfarin, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.89). The relative effects of dabigatran vs. warfarin on the occurrence of stroke or SE and major bleeding were consistent among those with and without HF and those with low (≤40%) or preserved (>40%) LVEF (P interaction not significant).. The overall benefits of dabigatran for stroke/SE prevention, and major and intracranial bleeding, relative to warfarin in the RE-LY trial were consistent in patients with and without HF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction (WARCEF) trial found no difference in the primary outcome between warfarin and aspirin in 2305 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in sinus rhythm. However, it is unknown whether any subgroups benefit from warfarin or aspirin.. We used a Cox model stepwise selection procedure to identify subgroups that may benefit from warfarin or aspirin on the WARCEF primary outcome. A secondary analysis added major hemorrhage to the outcome. The primary efficacy outcome was time to the first to occur of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death. Only age group was a significant treatment effect modifier (P for interaction, 0.003). Younger patients benefited from warfarin over aspirin on the primary outcome (4.81 versus 6.76 events per 100 patient-years: hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.84; P=0.001). In older patients, therapies did not differ (9.91 versus 9.01 events per 100 patient-years: hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.35; P=0.44). With major hemorrhage added, in younger patients the event rate remained lower for warfarin than aspirin (5.41 versus 7.25 per 100 patient-years: hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89; P=0.005), but in older patients it became significantly higher for warfarin (11.80 versus 9.35 per 100 patient-years: hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.53; P=0.03).. In patients <60 years, warfarin improved outcomes over aspirin with or without inclusion of major hemorrhage. In patients ≥60 years, there was no treatment difference, but the aspirin group had significantly better outcomes when major hemorrhage was included.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Warfarin

Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that has been shown to be an effective alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves.. In this phase 2 dose-validation study, we studied two populations of patients: those who had undergone aortic- or mitral-valve replacement within the past 7 days and those who had undergone such replacement at least 3 months earlier. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either dabigatran or warfarin. The selection of the initial dabigatran dose (150, 220, or 300 mg twice daily) was based on kidney function. Doses were adjusted to obtain a trough plasma level of at least 50 ng per milliliter. The warfarin dose was adjusted to obtain an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 or 2.5 to 3.5 on the basis of thromboembolic risk. The primary end point was the trough plasma level of dabigatran.. The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 252 patients because of an excess of thromboembolic and bleeding events among patients in the dabigatran group. In the as-treated analysis, dose adjustment or discontinuation of dabigatran was required in 52 of 162 patients (32%). Ischemic or unspecified stroke occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dabigatran group and in no patients in the warfarin group; major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (4%) and 2 patients (2%), respectively. All patients with major bleeding had pericardial bleeding.. The use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves was associated with increased rates of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, as compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and an excess risk. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01452347 and NCT01505881.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The aim of the current analysis was to identify independent predictors of the overall clinical outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including both stroke/thromboembolism and/or major bleeding. Given the overlap between stroke and bleeding risk factors, a composite risk-stratification score for stroke/thromboembolism or bleeding could potentially be developed.. We used data from the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) arm (n = 2,293; 65% men; mean age 70 ± 9 years) of the AMADEUS (Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which was a multicenter, randomized, open-label noninferiority study that compared fixed-dose idraparinux with VKA in patients with AF. We defined two composite end points: end point 1 was the combination of stroke/thromboembolism or major bleeding; end point 2 was defined as the combination of stroke, systemic or venous embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or major bleeding.. The independent predictors for composite end point 1 were age (P = .014), previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (P = .049), aspirin use (P = .002), and time in therapeutic range (P = .007). For composite end point 2, similar predictors were evident, plus left ventricular dysfunction (P = .011). Based on the regression models, two novel composite risk-prediction scores were developed and were validated externally in a "real-world" cohort of 441 outpatients with AF receiving anticoagulation treatment. Both composite scores 1 and 2 demonstrated numerically higher discriminatory performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.728; 95% CI, 0.659-0.798 and AUC, 0.707; 95% CI, 0.655-0.758, for end points 1 and 2, respectively) and a positive net reclassification when compared with currently used risk models (CHADS2 [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack], CHA2DS2VASc [cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years [doubled], diabetes, stroke (doubled)-vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category (female)], and HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly]), but the differences were not statistically significant.. We have developed and validated two novel composite scores for stroke/thromboembolism/bleeding that offer good discriminatory and predictive performance. However, these composite risk scores did not perform better than the easier and more practical "traditional" stroke and bleeding risk scores that are currently in use, which allow greater practicality and a more personalized balancing of risks.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Area Under Curve; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Oligosaccharides; Regression Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In ARISTOTLE, apixaban resulted in a 21% reduction in stroke, a 31% reduction in major bleeding, and an 11% reduction in death. However, approval of apixaban was delayed to investigate a statement in the clinical study report that "7.3% of subjects in the apixaban group and 1.2% of subjects in the warfarin group received, at some point during the study, a container of the wrong type.". Rates of study medication dispensing error were characterized through reviews of study medication container tear-off labels in 6,520 participants from randomly selected study sites. The potential effect of dispensing errors on study outcomes was statistically simulated in sensitivity analyses in the overall population.. The rate of medication dispensing error resulting in treatment error was 0.04%. Rates of participants receiving at least 1 incorrect container were 1.04% (34/3,273) in the apixaban group and 0.77% (25/3,247) in the warfarin group. Most of the originally reported errors were data entry errors in which the correct medication container was dispensed but the wrong container number was entered into the case report form. Sensitivity simulations in the overall trial population showed no meaningful effect of medication dispensing error on the main efficacy and safety outcomes.. Rates of medication dispensing error were low and balanced between treatment groups. The initially reported dispensing error rate was the result of data recording and data management errors and not true medication dispensing errors. These analyses confirm the previously reported results of ARISTOTLE.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Documentation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Labeling; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Errors; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation who are vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive may have a higher risk of thrombosis and/or bleeding than VKA-experienced patients.. Using data from ARISTOTLE, we assessed baseline characteristics and the treatment effect of apixaban versus warfarin in the VKA-naive and VKA-experienced cohorts. We compared rates of study drug discontinuation and time-in-therapeutic range. Overall, 7,800 (43%) were VKA naive, and 10,401 were VKA experienced. At baseline, both groups were similar with respect to age and congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke score (CHADS2). Fewer VKA-naive patients had a history of prior stroke (18% vs 21%) or prior bleeding (10% vs 22%) and were more often female (39% vs 33%). The effect of apixaban on the primary efficacy and safety outcomes was similar in VKA-naive (stroke/systemic embolism: hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.11 and major bleeding: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91) and VKA-experienced populations (stroke/systemic embolism: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.95, P value for interaction = 0.39 and major bleeding: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, P value for interaction = 0.50). Permanent study drug discontinuation was numerically less likely in patients receiving apixaban whether they were VKA naive (HR for discontinuation: 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.95) or VKA experienced (HR for discontinuation: 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02). Among patients receiving warfarin, the mean/median times in therapeutic range were lower in the VKA-naive group (VKA-naive: 57.5/61.4, VKA-experienced: 66.0/69.1, P < .001).. The treatment effects of apixaban (vs warfarin) were not modified by VKA naivety. The rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were numerically lower among the patients assigned to apixaban, irrespective of prior VKA use.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

A substantial portion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) also have coronary artery disease (CAD) and are at risk for coronary events. Warfarin is known to reduce these events, but increase the risk of bleeding. We assessed the effects of apixaban compared with warfarin in AF patients with and without prior CAD.. In ARISTOTLE, 18,201 patients with AF were randomized to apixaban or warfarin. History of CAD was defined as documented CAD, prior myocardial infarction, and/or history of coronary revascularization. We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without prior CAD and compared outcomes by randomized treatment using Cox models. A total of 6639 (36.5%) patients had prior CAD. These patients were more often male, more likely to have prior stroke, diabetes, and hypertension, and more often received aspirin at baseline (42.2% vs. 24.5%). The effects of apixaban were similar among patients with and without prior CAD on reducing stroke or systemic embolism and death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.27, P for interaction=0.12; HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.13, P for interaction=0.28). Rates of myocardial infarction were numerically lower with apixaban than warfarin among patients with and without prior CAD. The effect of apixaban on reducing major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage was consistent in patients with and without CAD.. In patients with AF, apixaban more often prevented stroke or systemic embolism and death and caused less bleeding than warfarin, regardless of the presence of prior CAD. Given the common occurrence of AF and CAD and the higher rates of cardiovascular events and death, our results indicate that apixaban may be a better treatment option than warfarin for these high-risk patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known.. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding.. The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32).. Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation have a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events such as ischaemic stroke, and patients are therefore recommended to be treated with anticoagulation treatment. The most commonly used anticoagulant consists of vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin. A new oral anticoagulation treatment, dabigatran, has recently been approved for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran as preventive treatment of stroke and thromboembolic events compared with warfarin in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden.. A decision analytic simulation model was used to estimate the long-term (20-year) costs and effects of the different treatments. The outcome measures are the number of strokes prevented, life years gained, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Costs and effect data are adjusted to a Swedish setting. Patients below 80 years of age are assumed to start with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day and switch to 110 mg twice a day at the age of 80 years due to higher bleeding risk. The price of dabigatran in Sweden is €2.82 (Swedish kronor 25.39) per day for both doses. The cost per QALY gained for dabigatran compared with warfarin is estimated at €7742, increasing to €12 449 if dabigatran is compared with only well-controlled warfarin treatment.. Dabigatran is a cost-effective treatment in Sweden, as its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is below the normally accepted willingness to pay limit.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Humans; Life Expectancy; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Sweden; Warfarin

We sought to define the factors associated with the occurrence of stroke and systemic embolism in a large, international atrial fibrillation (AF) trial.. In ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation), 14 264 patients with nonvalvular AF and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify factors at randomization independently associated with the occurrence of stroke or non-central nervous system embolism based on intention-to-treat analysis. A risk score was developed in ROCKET AF and validated in ATRIA (AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation), an independent AF patient cohort. Over a median follow-up of 1.94 years, 575 patients (4.0%) experienced primary end-point events. Reduced creatinine clearance was a strong, independent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism, second only to prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Additional factors associated with stroke and systemic embolism included elevated diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as vascular disease of the heart and limbs (C-index 0.635). A model that included creatinine clearance (R(2)CHADS(2)) improved net reclassification index by 6.2% compared with CHA(2)DS(2)VASc (C statistic=0.578) and by 8.2% compared with CHADS(2) (C statistic=0.575). The inclusion of creatinine clearance <60 mL/min and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack in a model with no other covariates led to a C statistic of 0.590.Validation of R(2)CHADS(2) in an external, separate population improved net reclassification index by 17.4% (95% confidence interval, 12.1%-22.5%) relative to CHADS(2).. In patients with nonvalvular AF at moderate to high risk of stroke, impaired renal function is a potent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism. Stroke risk stratification in patients with AF should include renal function.. URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Morpholines; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In the Japanese Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) study, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily was given to patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 50 ml/min (preserved renal function), and was reduced to 10mg once daily in patients with CrCl 30-49 ml/min (moderate renal impairment). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of the adjusted dose of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in a cohort with moderate renal impairment.. Compared with patients with preserved renal function, those with moderate renal impairment (22.2% of all randomized patients) had higher rates of bleeding and stroke events irrespective of study treatment. Among those with moderate renal impairment, the principal safety endpoint occurred at 27.76%/year with rivaroxaban vs. 22.85%/year with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.91) and the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 2.77%/year vs. 3.34%/year (HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25-2.69), respectively. There were no significant interactions between renal function and study treatment in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints (P=0.628, 0.279 for both interactions, respectively).. The safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were consistent in patients with moderate renal impairment and preserved renal function.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial showed that dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID was superior and dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this subgroup analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in patients who did and did not receive concomitant antiplatelets.. All comparisons used a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustments made for risk factors for bleeding. A time-dependent analysis was performed when comparing patients with concomitant antiplatelets with those without. Of 18 113 patients, 6952 (38.4%) received concomitant aspirin or clopidogrel at some time during the study. Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in reducing stroke and systemic embolism, whether patients received antiplatelets (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.70-1.25) or not (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.15; interaction P=0.738). There were fewer major bleeds than warfarin in both subgroups (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.00 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96 for patients who did not; interaction P=0.794). Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID reduced the primary outcome of stroke and systemic embolism in comparison with warfarin. This effect seemed attenuated among patients who used antiplatelets (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.08) in comparison with those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.72; P for interaction=0.058). Major bleeding was similar to warfarin regardless of antiplatelet use (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.15 for patients who did not; P for interaction=0.875). In the time-dependent analysis, concomitant use of a single antiplatelet seemed to increase the risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.42-1.82). Dual antiplatelet seemed to increased this even more (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.79-2.98). The absolute risks were lowest on dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID in comparison with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID or warfarin.. Concomitant antiplatelet drugs appeared to increase the risk for major bleeding in RE-LY without affecting the advantages of dabigatran over warfarin. Choosing between dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID requires a careful assessment of characteristics that influence the balance between benefit and harm.. URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.. Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70).. The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation.. : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prostheses and Implants; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Because of its association with atrial fibrillation and heart failure, we hypothesized that amino terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) would identify a subgroup of patients from the Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study, diagnosed with inferred noncardioembolic ischemic strokes, where anticoagulation would be more effective than antiplatelet agents in reducing risk of subsequent events.. NT-proBNP was measured in stored serum collected at baseline from participants enrolled in Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study, a previously reported randomized trial. Relative effectiveness of warfarin and aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke or death over 2 years was compared based on NT-proBNP concentrations.. About 95% of 1028 patients with assays had NT-proBNP below 750 pg/mL, and among them, no evidence for treatment effect modification was evident. For 49 patients with NT-proBNP >750 pg/mL, the 2-year rate of events per 100 person-years was 45.9 for the aspirin group and 16.6 for the warfarin group, whereas for 979 patients with NT-proBNP ≤750 pg/mL, rates were similar for both treatments. For those with NT-proBNP >750 pg/mL, the hazard ratio was 0.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.84; P=0.021) significantly favoring warfarin over aspirin. A formal test for interaction of NT-proBNP with treatment was significant (P=0.01).. For secondary stroke prevention, elevated NT-proBNP concentrations may identify a subgroup of ischemic stroke patients without known atrial fibrillation, about 5% based on the current study, who may benefit more from anticoagulants than antiplatelet agents. Clinical Trial Registration- This trial was not registered because enrollment began before 2005.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The overall analysis of the rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) trial revealed that rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin with respect to the primary safety outcome. In addition, there was a strong trend for a reduction in the rate of stroke/systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.. In this subanalysis of the J-ROCKET AF trial, we investigated the consistency of safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among the subgroups of patients with previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or non-central nervous system systemic embolism (secondary prevention group) and those without (primary prevention group).. Patients in the secondary prevention group were 63.6% of the overall population of J-ROCKET AF. In the secondary prevention group, the rate of the principal safety outcome (% per year) was 17.02 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 18.26 in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.29), while the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 1.66 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 3.25 in warfarin-treated patients (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.14). There were no significant interactions in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin between the primary and secondary prevention groups (P=.090 and .776 for both interactions, respectively).. The safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients in the primary prevention group and those in the secondary prevention group.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was to understand the possible risk of discontinuation in the context of clinical care.. Rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Concerns exist regarding possible increased risk of stroke and non-central nervous system (CNS) thromboembolic events early after discontinuation of rivaroxaban.. We undertook a post-hoc analysis of data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation, n = 14,624) for stroke or non-CNS embolism within 30 days after temporary interruptions of 3 days or more, early permanent study drug discontinuation, and end-of-study transition to open-label therapy.. Stroke and non-CNS embolism occurred at similar rates after temporary interruptions (rivaroxaban: n = 9, warfarin: n = 8, 6.20 vs. 5.05/100 patient-years, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 3.31, p = 0.62) and after early permanent discontinuation (rivaroxaban: n = 42, warfarin: n = 36, 25.60 vs. 23.28/100 patient-years, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.72, p = 0.66). Patients transitioning to open-label therapy at the end of the study had more strokes with rivaroxaban (n = 22) versus warfarin (n = 6, 6.42 vs. 1.73/100 patient-years, HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.51 to 9.16, p = 0.0044) and took longer to reach a therapeutic international normalized ratio with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. All thrombotic events within 30 days of any study drug cessation (including stroke, non-CNS embolism, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) were similar between groups (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26, p = 0.85).. In atrial fibrillation patients who temporarily or permanently discontinued anticoagulation, the risk of stroke or non-CNS embolism was similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. An increased risk of stroke and non-CNS embolism was observed in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with warfarin-treated patients after the end of the study, underscoring the importance of therapeutic anticoagulation coverage during such a transition.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common significant cardiac rhythm disorder, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Atrial fibrillation confers a fivefold increased risk of stroke, and these strokes are associated with significant mortality and disability. The vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, has been the mainstay of anticoagulant therapy for patients with AF, reducing the risk of stroke by 65%. Despite its efficacy, warfarin remains underused in clinical practice because of its variable dose response, diet and medication interactions, and need for frequent monitoring. Stroke prevention in AF has entered an exciting therapeutic era with new classes of targeted anticoagulants that avoid the many pitfalls of the vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran, an oral thrombin inhibitor, and the factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have demonstrated efficacy for stroke prevention and a reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage relative to warfarin. Translating the efficacy of clinical trials into effective use of these novel agents in clinical practice will require an understanding of their pharmacokinetic profiles, dose selection, and management in select clinical situations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Warfarin

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) for international normalized ratio (INR) is an accepted quality measure of anticoagulation control in patient populations, but its usefulness for predicting stroke and bleeding in individuals is not well understood.. In a nested case control analysis among ACTIVE W study patients, cases with stroke and cases with bleeding were separately matched with controls. Several anticoagulation quality measures were compared, overall and in a time-dependent manner.. 32 cases with ischemic stroke and 234 cases with bleeding in the analysis were matched in a 4:1 ratio to 122 and 865 controls, respectively. Follow-up duration was 257±154days for the stroke analysis and 222±146days for the bleeding analysis. Compared with their respective controls, the study mean TTR of both stroke cases (53.9%±25.1 vs 63.4%±24.8; p=0.055) and bleeding cases (56.2%±25.4 vs 63.4%±26.8; p<0.001) was lower. Time below range for stroke and time above range for bleeding were only greater in the last month leading up to the event, not over the entire study period. Rather, over the entire study period bleeding cases spent more time below range than controls (26.8%±25.9 vs 20.8%±24.0; p=0.001).. TTR was lower in individual AF patients with stroke or bleeding compared with matched controls in ACTIVE W. Maintaining a high TTR, with equal importance to avoid low and high INRs, is a relevant goal of individual patient treatment to prevent stroke and bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Quality of Life; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Anticoagulation has been shown to decrease ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, concerns remain regarding their safety and efficacy in those ≥70 years of age who constitute most patients with AF. Of the 4,060 patients (mean age 65 years, range 49 to 80) in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, 2,248 (55% of 4,060) were 70 to 80 years of age, 1,901 of whom were receiving warfarin. Propensity score for warfarin use, estimated for each of the 2,248 patients, was used to match 227 of the 347 patients not on warfarin (in 1:1, 1:2, or 1:3 sets) to 616 patients on warfarin who were balanced in 45 baseline characteristics. All-cause mortality occurred in 18% and 33% of matched patients receiving and not receiving warfarin, respectively, during up to 6 years (mean 3.4) of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] when warfarin use was compared to its nonuse 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.77, p <0.001). All-cause hospitalization occurred in 64% and 67% of matched patients receiving and not receiving warfarin, respectively (HR associated with warfarin use 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.12, p = 0.423). Ischemic stroke occurred in 4% and 8% of matched patients receiving and not receiving warfarin, respectively (HR associated with warfarin use 0.57, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.04, p = 0.068). Major bleeding occurred in 7% and 10% of matched patients receiving and not receiving warfarin, respectively (HR associated with warfarin use 0.73, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.22, p = 0.229). In conclusion, warfarin use was associated with decreased mortality in septuagenarian patients with AF but had no association with hospitalization or major bleeding.

Topics: Age Distribution; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quebec; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major risk factors for ischemic stroke, and 90% of thromboembolisms in these patients arise from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Recently, it has been documented that an LAA occlusion device (OD) is not inferior to warfarin therapy, and that it reduces mortality and risk of stroke in patients with AF.. We implanted LAA-ODs in 5 Korean patients (all male, 59.8 ± 7.3 years old) with long-standing persistent AF or permanent AF via a percutaneous trans-septal approach.. 1) The major reasons for LAA-OD implantation were high risk of recurrent stroke (80%), labile international neutralizing ratio with hemorrhage (60%), and 3/5 (60%) patients had a past history of failed cardioversion for rhythm control. 2) The mean LA size was 51.3 ± 5.0 mm and LAA size was 25.1 × 30.1 mm. We implanted the LAA-OD (28.8 ± 3.4 mm device) successfully in all 5 patients with no complications. 3) After eight weeks of anticoagulation, all patients switched from warfarin to anti-platelet agent after confirmation of successful LAA occlusion by trans-esophageal echocardiography.. We report on our early experience with LAA-OD deployment in patients with 1) persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation despite significant risk of ischemic stroke, or 2) recurrent stroke in patients who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Contraindications; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing and consequent peri-device residual blood flow in patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure with the Watchman device (Atritech, Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota).. During percutaneous LAA closure for stroke prophylaxis, the geometric variability of the LAA ostium may result in an incomplete seal of the LAA. On the one hand, this could enhance thrombus formation and embolization of thrombi around the device into the circulation; on the other hand, the relatively small size of these leaks may preclude clinically relevant embolizations.. Patients randomly assigned to device implantation in the PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial were analyzed. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed at 45 days, 6 months, and 12 months. Per the study protocol, patients discontinued warfarin therapy if the 45-day Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed either minimal or no peri-device flow (jet ≤5 mm width). The impact of peri-device flow severity, defined as minor, moderate, or major (<1 mm, 1 mm to 3 mm, >3 mm, respectively) on the composite primary efficacy endpoint (stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death) is expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up revealed that 32.0% of implanted patients had at least some degree of peri-device flow at 12 months. The HR of the primary efficacy endpoint per 1 mm larger per-device flow was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.14; p = 0.256). Compared to patients with no peri-device flow, the HRs were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.11 to 6.40), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.33 to 2.09), and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.11 to 2.09) for minor, moderate, and major peri-device flow, respectively (p = 0.798). Compared to patients with no peri-device flow who discontinued warfarin, the HR for patients with any peri-device flow and continuing warfarin was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.14 to 2.71; p = 0.530).. These data indicate that residual peri-device flow into the LAA after percutaneous closure with the Watchman device was common, and is not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. This finding should be interpreted with caution as the low event rate decreases the confidence of this conclusion.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheterization; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electrocardiography; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to adjusted-dose warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin is consistent among the subgroups of patients with and without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).. In ROCKET AF, patients with AF who were at increased risk of stroke were randomly assigned (1:1) in a double-blind manner to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or adjusted dose warfarin (international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Between Dec 18, 2006, and June 17, 2009, 14 264 patients from 1178 centres in 45 countries were randomly assigned. The primary endpoint was the composite of stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism. In this substudy we assessed the interaction of the treatment effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin among patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done in the on-treatment population. ROCKET AF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00403767.. 7468 (52%) patients had a previous stroke (n=4907) or TIA (n=2561) and 6796 (48%) had no previous stroke or TIA. The number of events per 100 person-years for the primary endpoint in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (2·79% rivaroxaban vs 2·96% warfarin; hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·77-1·16) and those without (1·44%vs 1·88%; 0·77, 0·58-1·01; interaction p=0·23). The number of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding events per 100 person-years in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (13·31% rivaroxaban vs 13·87% warfarin; HR 0·96, 95% CI 0·87-1·07) and those without (16·69%vs 15·19%; 1·10, 0·99-1·21; interaction p=0·08).. There was no evidence that the relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was different between patients who had a previous stroke or TIA and those who had no previous stroke or TIA. These results support the use of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for prevention of recurrent as well as initial stroke in patients with AF.. Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development and Bayer HealthCare.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The prevalence of patent foramen ovale among patients with cryptogenic stroke is higher than that in the general population. Closure with a percutaneous device is often recommended in such patients, but it is not known whether this intervention reduces the risk of recurrent stroke.. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of closure with a percutaneous device, as compared with medical therapy alone, in patients between 18 and 60 years of age who presented with a cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and had a patent foramen ovale. The primary end point was a composite of stroke or transient ischemic attack during 2 years of follow-up, death from any cause during the first 30 days, or death from neurologic causes between 31 days and 2 years.. A total of 909 patients were enrolled in the trial. The cumulative incidence (Kaplan-Meier estimate) of the primary end point was 5.5% in the closure group (447 patients) as compared with 6.8% in the medical-therapy group (462 patients) (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.35; P=0.37). The respective rates were 2.9% and 3.1% for stroke (P=0.79) and 3.1% and 4.1% for TIA (P=0.44). No deaths occurred by 30 days in either group, and there were no deaths from neurologic causes during the 2-year follow-up period. A cause other than paradoxical embolism was usually apparent in patients with recurrent neurologic events.. In patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA who had a patent foramen ovale, closure with a device did not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent stroke or TIA. (Funded by NMT Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00201461.).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism, Paradoxical; Female; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prostheses and Implants; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin; Young Adult

The CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack [2 points]) scoring scheme has been found to be a good predictor of stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of the CHADS(2) scoring system in the risk stratification of patients with AF who undergo direct-current cardioversion has not yet been specifically investigated. In this study, a subgroup of 541 patients from the Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) study who had AF for >48 hours and planned to undergo transesophageal echocardiography before direct-current cardioversion were enrolled. Each patient had a CHADS(2) score calculated. Of the patients with CHADS(2) scores of 0, 14 (10%) were found to have left atrial appendage thrombi on transesophageal echocardiography. After 6 months of follow up, patients with CHADS(2) scores of 3 to 6 showed a significantly higher mortality rate in comparison with patients with lower CHADS(2) scores (4.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.004), despite their similar prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke (thrombus: 13.4% vs 11.6%, p = 0.60; stroke: 0% vs 0.3%, p = 0.70). In conclusion, the CHADS(2) scoring system may be useful for predicting short-term mortality risk in patients with AF receiving elective direct-current cardioversion. However, in the preprocedural risk assessment of these patients, the CHADS(2) scoring system is not reliable in predicting risk for left atrial appendage thrombus formation, especially in patients with low CHADS(2) scores.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Female; Heparin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thrombosis; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; Warfarin

It is unknown whether warfarin or aspirin therapy is superior for patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm.. We designed this trial to determine whether warfarin (with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) or aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg per day) is a better treatment for patients in sinus rhythm who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We followed 2305 patients for up to 6 years (mean [±SD], 3.5±1.8). The primary outcome was the time to the first event in a composite end point of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death from any cause.. The rates of the primary outcome were 7.47 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group and 7.93 in the aspirin group (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.10; P=0.40). Thus, there was no significant overall difference between the two treatments. In a time-varying analysis, the hazard ratio changed over time, slightly favoring warfarin over aspirin by the fourth year of follow-up, but this finding was only marginally significant (P=0.046). Warfarin, as compared with aspirin, was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke throughout the follow-up period (0.72 events per 100 patient-years vs. 1.36 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82; P=0.005). The rate of major hemorrhage was 1.78 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group as compared with 0.87 in the aspirin group (P<0.001). The rates of intracerebral and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (0.27 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin and 0.22 with aspirin, P=0.82).. Among patients with reduced LVEF who were in sinus rhythm, there was no significant overall difference in the primary outcome between treatment with warfarin and treatment with aspirin. A reduced risk of ischemic stroke with warfarin was offset by an increased risk of major hemorrhage. The choice between warfarin and aspirin should be individualized. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; WARCEF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00041938.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the ARISTOTLE trial, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was reduced by apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have a high risk of stroke. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in prespecified subgroups of patients with and without previous stroke or TIA.. Between Dec 19, 2006, and April 2, 2010, patients were enrolled in the ARISTOTLE trial at 1034 clinical sites in 39 countries. 18,201 patients with AF or atrial flutter were randomly assigned to receive apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin (target international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). The median duration of follow-up was 1·8 years (IQR 1·4-2·3). The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding in the on-treatment population. All participants, investigators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignments. In this subgroup analysis, we estimated event rates and used Cox models to compare outcomes in patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. The ARISTOTLE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NTC00412984.. Of the trial population, 3436 (19%) had a previous stroke or TIA. In the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or TIA, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 2·46 per 100 patient-years of follow-up in the apixaban group and 3·24 in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·56 to 1·03); in the subgroup of patients without previous stroke or TIA, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1·01 per 100 patient-years of follow-up with apixaban and 1·23 with warfarin (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·03; p for interaction=0·71). The absolute reduction in the rate of stroke and systemic embolism with apixaban versus warfarin was 0·77 per 100 patient-years of follow-up (95% CI -0·08 to 1·63) in patients with and 0·22 (-0·03 to 0·47) in those without previous stroke or TIA. The difference in major bleeding with apixaban compared with warfarin was 1·07 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0·09-2·04) in patients with and 0·93 (0·54-1·32) in those without previous stroke or TIA.. The effects of apixaban versus warfarin were consistent in patients with AF with and without previous stroke or TIA. Owing to the higher risk of these outcomes in patients with previous stroke or TIA, the absolute benefits of apixaban might be greater in this population.. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Therapy with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) effectively reduces the thrombosis risk in many clinical conditions. Genetic variants of vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC-1) are associated with increased VKA effect and bleeding risk. It is unknown whether these variants could also affect the long-term outcome in patients with high-dosage oral anticoagulation and/or more difficult adherence to the therapeutic INR range. Hundred and twenty-four patients with mechanical heart valve replacement assuming VKA were genotyped for VKORC-1 -1639G>A (Rs9923231) polymorphism. Hemorrhage, venous thrombosis and atherothrombotic events were retrospectively assessed for a 6-year period. Furthermore, stability of their INR in relationship with the VKORC-1 genotype was investigated day-by-day for 3 months. No differences were observed in hemorrhage and venous thrombosis events according to rs 9923231. GG genotype carriers (n = 41) had no atherothrombotic events, while 4 strokes, 4 TIA and 3 AMI were diagnosed in A carriers (n = 83; P = 0.0008). During the daily observation period, A allele carriers had lower VKA requirements (4.7, 3.7, 2.2 mg/day for GG/GA/AA genotype respectively; P = 0.00001), higher mean INR (2.7, 2.8, 2.9; P = 0.05) and a higher number of examinations above the therapeutic range than GG carriers (17 % vs. 0 % in GG genotype, P = 0.036). Conversely, patients with GG genotype had a more stable dosage of VKA (P = 0.006) and a higher percentage of examinations under the therapeutic range (51, 43 and 36 % in GG, GA and AA genotype, respectively, P = 0.040). In patients with high dosage VKA, VKORC-1 polymorphism is associated to a different warfarin dosage, anticoagulation level, time spent outside the therapeutic range and, in the long-term, a different incidence of atherothrombotic events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mixed Function Oxygenases; Myocardial Infarction; Polymorphism, Genetic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

The global ROCKET AF study evaluated once-daily rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A separate trial, J-ROCKET AF, compared the safety of a Japan-specific rivaroxaban dose with warfarin administered according to Japanese guidelines in Japanese patients with AF.. J-ROCKET AF was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Patients (n=1,280) with non-valvular AF at increased risk for stroke were randomized to receive 15 mg once-daily rivaroxaban or warfarin dose-adjusted according to Japanese guidelines. The primary objective was to determine non-inferiority of rivaroxaban against warfarin for the principal safety outcome of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding, in the on-treatment safety population. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Non-inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin was confirmed; the rate of the principal safety outcome was 18.04% per year in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 16.42% per year in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.42; P<0.001 [non-inferiority]). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 0.8% with rivaroxaban and 1.6% with warfarin. There was a strong trend for a reduction in the rate of stroke/systemic embolism with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin (HR, 0.49; P=0.050).. J-ROCKET AF demonstrated the safety of a Japan-specific rivaroxaban dose and supports bridging the global ROCKET AF results into Japanese clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Dabigatran reduces ischemic stroke in comparison with warfarin; however, given the lack of antidote, there is concern that it might increase bleeding when surgery or invasive procedures are required.. The current analysis was undertaken to compare the periprocedural bleeding risk of patients in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial treated with dabigatran and warfarin. Bleeding rates were evaluated from 7 days before until 30 days after invasive procedures, considering only the first procedure for each patient. A total of 4591 patients underwent at least 1 invasive procedure: 24.7% of patients received dabigatran 110 mg, 25.4% received dabigatran 150 mg, and 25.9% received warfarin, P=0.34. Procedures included: pacemaker/defibrillator insertion (10.3%), dental procedures (10.0%), diagnostic procedures (10.0%), cataract removal (9.3%), colonoscopy (8.6%), and joint replacement (6.2%). Among patients assigned to either dabigatran dose, the last dose of study drug was given 49 (35-85) hours before the procedure on comparison with 114 (87-144) hours in patients receiving warfarin, P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the rates of periprocedural major bleeding between patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg (3.8%) or dabigatran 150 mg (5.1%) or warfarin (4.6%); dabigatran 110 mg versus warfarin: relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.17; P=0.28; dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin: relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.49; P=0.58. Among patients having urgent surgery, major bleeding occurred in 17.8% with dabigatran 110 mg, 17.7% with dabigatran 150 mg, and 21.6% with warfarin: dabigatran 110 mg; relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.41; P=0.47; dabigatran 150 mg: relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.35; P=0.44.. Dabigatran and warfarin were associated with similar rates of periprocedural bleeding, including patients having urgent surgery. Dabigatran facilitated a shorter interruption of oral anticoagulation.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Brain Ischemia; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cataract Extraction; Dabigatran; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

We performed a randomised pilot trial of PerMIT, a novel decision support tool for genotype-based warfarin initiation and maintenance dosing, to assess its efficacy for improving warfarin management. We prospectively studied 26 subjects to compare PerMIT-guided management with routine anticoagulation service management. CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype results for 13 subjects randomly assigned to the PerMIT arm were recorded within 24 hours of enrolment. To aid in INR interpretation, PerMIT calculates estimated loading and maintenance doses based on a patient's genetic and clinical characteristics and displays calculated S-warfarin plasma concentrations based on planned or administered dosages. In comparison to control subjects, patients in the PerMIT study arm demonstrated a 3.6-day decrease in the time to reach a stabilised INR within the target therapeutic range (4.7 vs. 8.3 days, p = 0.015); a 12.8% increase in time spent within the therapeutic interval over the first 25 days of therapy (64.3% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.180); and a 32.9% decrease in the frequency of warfarin dose adjustments per INR measurement (38.3% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.007). Serial measurements of plasma S-warfarin concentrations were also obtained to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of the pharmacokinetic model during induction therapy. The PerMIT S-warfarin plasma concentration model estimated 62.8% of concentrations within 0.15 mg/l. These pilot data suggest that the PerMIT method and its incorporation of genotype/phenotype information may help practitioners increase the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of warfarin therapeutic management.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Anticoagulants; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Decision Support Techniques; Disease Management; Drug Monitoring; Female; Genotype; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Mixed Function Oxygenases; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Software; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with impaired renal function. Apixaban, a novel oral anticoagulant with partial renal excretion, was compared with warfarin and reduced the rate stroke, death and bleeding in the ARISTOTLE trial. We evaluated these outcomes in relation to renal function.. Baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations as well as cystatin C measurements. According to baseline Cockcroft-Gault, there were 7518 patients (42%) with an estimated GFR (eGFR) of >80 mL/min, 7587 (42%) between >50 and 80 mL/min, and 3017 (15%) with an eGFR of ≤50 mL/min. The rate of cardiovascular events and bleeding was higher at impaired renal function (≤80 mL/min). Apixaban was more effective than warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and reducing mortality irrespective of renal function. These results were consistent, regardless of methods for GFR estimation. Apixaban was associated with less major bleeding events across all ranges of eGFRs. The relative risk reduction in major bleeding was greater in patients with an eGFR of ≤50 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault {hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.66], interaction P = 0.005} or CKD-EPI equations [HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.37-0.64), interaction P = 0.003].. In patients with AF, renal impairment was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding. When compared with warfarin, apixaban treatment reduced the rate of stroke, death, and major bleeding, regardless of renal function. Patients with impaired renal function seemed to have the greatest reduction in major bleeding with apixaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin decreases risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) dependent on percent time in the therapeutic range (TTR) with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3. We hypothesized that gender differences in ischemic stroke risk are related to TTR. From the AFFIRM database of 4,060 patients with AF, we determined the incidence of ischemic stroke by gender. We evaluated the INR at time of ischemic stroke and calculated TTR. We determined the relation between gender and ischemic stroke by TTR. Women had CHADS(2) Scores (3.7 ± 1.3 vs 2.5 ± 1.3, p <0.0001) and more ischemic strokes than men (5% vs 3%, odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.26, p = 0.002). Mean INR near time of ischemic stroke was 2 for women and men; median values were subtherapeutic (1.7 and 1.8, respectively). Women spent more time outside the therapeutic range (40 ± 0.7% vs 37 ± 0.5%, p = 0.0001), with more time below the therapeutic range (29 ± 0.7% vs 26 ± 0.5%, p = 0.0002). A higher TTR protected against ischemic stroke for women but not for men. Women who had a comparably high TTR (≥66%) still had more ischemic strokes (p = 0.009). A fitted Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that gender, TTR <46% versus >80%, age, and previous stroke were significantly related to stroke incidence. In conclusion, women in AFFIRM were at greater risk of ischemic stroke than men, in part related to differences in TTR. Women with AF may benefit from more aggressive or novel anticoagulation to decrease their risk of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

The outcome of atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin partially depends on maintaining adequate time in therapeutic International Normalized Ratio range (TTR). Large differences in TTR have been reported between centers and countries. The association between warfarin dosing practice, TTR, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial patients receiving warfarin.. RE-LY provided an algorithm for warfarin dosing, recommending no change for in-range, and 10% to 15% weekly dose changes for out-of-range International Normalized Ratio values. We determined whether dose adjustments were consistent with algorithm recommendations but could not verify whether providers used the algorithm. Using multilevel regression models to adjust for patient, center, and country characteristics, we assessed whether algorithm-consistent warfarin dosing could predict patient TTR and the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, or major hemorrhage. We included 6022 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients from 912 centers in 44 countries. We found a strong association between the proportion of algorithm-consistent warfarin doses and mean country TTR (R(2)=0.65). The degree of algorithm-consistency accounted for 87% of the between-center and 55% of the between-country TTR variation. Each 10% increase in center algorithm-consistent dosing independently predicted a 6.12% increase in TTR (95% confidence interval, 5.65-6.59) and an 8% decrease in rate of the composite clinical outcome (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.00).. Adherence, intentional or not, to a simple warfarin dosing algorithm predicts improved TTR and accounts for considerable TTR variation between centers and countries. Systems facilitating algorithm-based warfarin dosing could optimize anticoagulation quality and improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation on a global scale.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Internationality; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Apixaban reduces stroke with comparable bleeding risks when compared with aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation who are unsuitable for vitamin k antagonist therapy. This analysis explores patterns of bleeding and defines bleeding risks based on stroke risk with apixaban and aspirin.. The Apixaban versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Have Failed or Are Unsuitable for Vitamin k Antagonist Treatment (AVERROES) trial randomized 5599 patients with atrial fibrillation and risk factors to receive either apixaban or aspirin. Bleeding events were defined as the first occurrence of either major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.. The rate of a bleeding event was 3.8%/year with aspirin and 4.5%/year with apixaban (hazard ratio with apixaban, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.92-1.51; P=0.19). The anatomic site of bleeding did not differ between therapies. Risk factors for bleeding common to apixaban and aspirin were use of nonstudy aspirin>50% of the time and a history of daily/occasional nosebleeds. The rates of both stroke and bleeding increased with higher CHADS2 scores but apixaban compared with aspirin was associated with a similar relative risk of bleeding (P interaction 0.21) and a reduced relative risk of stroke (P interaction 0.37) irrespective of CHADS2 category.. Anatomic sites and predictors of bleeding are similar for apixaban and aspirin in these patients. Higher CHADS2 scores are associated with increasing rates of bleeding and stroke, but the balance between risks and benefits of apixaban compared with aspirin is favorable irrespective of baseline stroke risk. Clinical Trial Registration Information- www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 00496769.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Contraindications; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial showed that apixaban is better than warfarin at prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, causes less bleeding, and results in lower mortality. We assessed in this trial's participants how results differed according to patients' CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, and HAS-BLED scores, used to predict the risk of stroke and bleeding.. ARISTOTLE was a double-blind, randomised trial that enrolled 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation in 39 countries. Patients were randomly assigned apixaban 5 mg twice daily (n=9120) or warfarin (target international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0; n=9081). The primary endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. We calculated CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, and HAS-BLED scores of patients at randomisation. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat, and safety analyses were of the population who received the study drug. ARISTOTLE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00412984.. Apixaban significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolism with no evidence of a differential effect by risk of stroke (CHADS(2) 1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·4457; or CHA(2)DS(2)VASc 1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·1210) or bleeding (HAS-BLED 0-1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·9422). Patients who received apixaban had lower rates of major bleeding than did those who received warfarin, with no difference across all score categories (CHADS(2), p for interaction=0·4018; CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, p for interaction=0·2059; HAS-BLED, p for interaction=0·7127). The relative risk reduction in intracranial bleeding tended to be greater in patients with HAS-BLED scores of 3 or higher (hazard ratio [HR] 0·22, 95% CI 0·10-0·48) than in those with HAS-BLED scores of 0-1 (HR 0·66, 0·39-1·12; p for interaction=0·0604).. Because apixaban has benefits over warfarin that are consistent across patient risk of stroke and bleeding as assessed by the CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED scores, these scores might be less relevant when used to tailor apixaban treatment to individual patients than they are for warfarin. Further improvement in risk stratification for both stroke and bleeding is needed, particularly for patients with atrial fibrillation at low risk for these events.. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Plasma proteins mediate thrombogenesis, inflammation, endocardial injury and structural remodelling in atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesised that anti-coagulation with rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, would differentially modulate biologically-relevant plasma proteins, compared with warfarin, a multi-coagulation protein antagonist. We performed unbiased liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy and candidate multiplexed protein immunoassays among Japanese subjects with non-valvular chronic AF who were randomly assigned to treatment with 24 weeks of rivaroxaban (n=93) or warfarin (n=94). Nine metaproteins, including fibulin-1 (p=0.0033), vitronectin (p=0.0010), haemoglobin α (p=0.0012), apolipoproteins C-II (p=0.0017) and H (p=0.0023), complement C5 precursor (p=0.0026), coagulation factor XIIIA (p=0.0026) and XIIIB (p=0.0032) subunits, and 10 candidate proteins, including thrombomodulin (p=0.0004), intercellular adhesion molecule-3 (p=0.0064), interleukin-8 (p=0.0007) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p=0.0003), were differentially expressed among patients with and without known clinical risk factors for stroke and bleeding in AF. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a greater increase in thrombomodulin (Δ 0.1 vs. 0.3 pg/ml, p=0.0026) and a trend towards a reduction in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Δ 2.2 vs. -4.9 pg/ml, p=0.0757) over 24 weeks. Only modest correlations were observed between protein levels and prothrombin time, factor Xa activity and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Plasma proteomics can identify distinct functional patterns of protein expression that report on known stroke and bleeding risk phenotypes in an ethnically-homogeneous AF population. The greater upregulation of thrombomodulin among patients randomised to rivaroxaban represents a proof-of-principle that pharmacoproteomics can be employed to discern novel effects of factor Xa inhibition beyond standard pharmacodynamic measures.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Blood Proteins; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Proteomics; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Brain injury from stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) may result in a persistent neuroinflammatory response in the injury penumbra. This response may include microglial activation and excess levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Previous experimental data suggest that etanercept, a selective TNF inhibitor, has the ability to ameliorate microglial activation and modulate the adverse synaptic effects of excess TNF. Perispinal administration may enhance etanercept delivery across the blood-CSF barrier.. The objective of this study was to systematically examine the clinical response following perispinal administration of etanercept in a cohort of patients with chronic neurological dysfunction after stroke and TBI.. After approval by an independent external institutional review board (IRB), a chart review of all patients with chronic neurological dysfunction following stroke or TBI who were treated open-label with perispinal etanercept (PSE) from November 1, 2010 to July 14, 2012 at a group medical practice was performed.. The treated cohort included 629 consecutive patients. Charts of 617 patients following stroke and 12 patients following TBI were reviewed. The mean age of the stroke patients was 65.8 years ± 13.15 (range 13-97). The mean interval between treatment with PSE and stroke was 42.0 ± 57.84 months (range 0.5-419); for TBI the mean interval was 115.2 ± 160.22 months (range 4-537). Statistically significant improvements in motor impairment, spasticity, sensory impairment, cognition, psychological/behavioural function, aphasia and pain were noted in the stroke group, with a wide variety of additional clinical improvements noted in individuals, such as reductions in pseudobulbar affect and urinary incontinence. Improvements in multiple domains were typical. Significant improvement was noted irrespective of the length of time before treatment was initiated; there was evidence of a strong treatment effect even in the subgroup of patients treated more than 10 years after stroke and TBI. In the TBI cohort, motor impairment and spasticity were statistically significantly reduced.. Irrespective of the methodological limitations, the present results provide clinical evidence that stroke and TBI may lead to a persistent and ongoing neuroinflammatory response in the brain that is amenable to therapeutic intervention by selective inhibition of TNF, even years after the acute injury.. Excess TNF contributes to chronic neurological, neuropsychiatric and clinical impairment after stroke and TBI. Perispinal administration of etanercept produces clinical improvement in patients with chronic neurological dysfunction following stroke and TBI. The therapeutic window extends beyond a decade after stroke and TBI. Randomized clinical trials will be necessary to further quantify and characterize the clinical response.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Brain Injuries; Cohort Studies; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Injections, Spinal; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Skills; Muscle Spasticity; Nervous System Diseases; Pain Management; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; Recovery of Function; Sensation; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Walking; Warfarin; Young Adult

The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors of bleeding in a cohort of anticoagulated patients and to evaluate the predictive value of several bleeding risk stratification schemas.. The risk of bleeding during antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not homogeneous, and several clinical risk factors have been incorporated into clinical bleeding risk stratification schemas. Current risk stratification schemas for bleeding during anticoagulation therapy have been based on complex scoring systems that are difficult to apply in clinical practice, and few have been derived and validated in AF cohorts.. We investigated predictors of bleeding in a cohort of 7,329 patients with AF participating in the SPORTIF (Stroke Prevention Using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation) III and V clinical trials and evaluated the predictive value of several risk stratification schemas by multivariate analysis. Patients were anticoagulated orally with either adjusted-dose warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2 to 3) or fixed-dose ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily. Major bleeding was centrally adjudicated, and concurrent aspirin therapy was allowed in patients with clinical atherosclerosis.. By multivariate analyses, significant predictors of bleeding were concurrent aspirin use (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59 to 2.77; p < 0.001); renal impairment (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.42 to 2.76; p < 0.001); age 75 years or older (HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.17; p = 0.0008); diabetes (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.97; p = 0.009), and heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.73; p = 0.041). Of the tested schemas, the new HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) score performed best, with a stepwise increase in rates of major bleeding with increasing HAS-BLED score (p(trend) <0.0001). The c statistic for bleeding varied between 0.50 and 0.67 in the overall entire cohort and 0.68 among patients naive to warfarin at baseline (n = 769).. This analysis identifies diabetes and heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction as potential risk factors for bleeding in AF beyond those previously recognized. Of the contemporary bleeding risk stratification schemas, the new HAS-BLED scheme offers useful predictive capacity for bleeding over previously published schemas and may be simpler to apply.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Management of oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation remains controversial. Prior studies demonstrate that continuation of warfarin may be safer when compared with strategies requiring interruption and/or heparin bridging. Limited data from randomized trials exist.. We conducted a randomized trial to determine whether warfarin continuation is superior to warfarin interruption during PPM or ICD implantation.. Patients on oral anticoagulation referred for PPM or ICD implantation were randomized to warfarin continuation versus interruption. Patients randomized to warfarin interruption were further stratified into two groups based on their risk for thromboembolic events in the absence of warfarin. Moderate-risk patients were randomized to warfarin continuation versus warfarin interruption. High-risk patients were randomized to warfarin continuation versus warfarin interruption with heparin bridging. The primary combined outcome included thromboembolic events, anticoagulant-related complications, or any significant bleeding necessitating additional intervention or discontinuation of anticoagulation.. We studied 100 patients (average age 70.8 years, 21% female, mean body mass index 28.4) who underwent 64 ICD and 36 PPM implantations. Fifty patients were assigned to continue warfarin. The randomized groups were well matched. Among patients randomized to warfarin interruption, there were two pocket hematomas, one pericardial effusion, one transient ischemic attack, and one patient who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. No events were noted among patients continuing warfarin (P = .056).. While the results were not statistically significant, there was a trend toward reduced complications in patients randomized to warfarin continuation. This strategy should be considered in patients undergoing PPM or ICD implantation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Male; Pacemaker, Artificial; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Implantation; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial compared dabigatran 110 mg BID (D110) and 150 mg BID (D150) with warfarin for stroke prevention in 18 113 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. Cardioversion on randomized treatment was permitted. Precardioversion transesophageal echocardiography was encouraged, particularly in dabigatran-assigned patients. Data from before, during, and 30 days after cardioversion were analyzed. A total of 1983 cardioversions were performed in 1270 patients: 647, 672, and 664 in the D110, D150, and warfarin groups, respectively. For D110, D150, and warfarin, transesophageal echocardiography was performed before 25.5%, 24.1%, and 13.3% of cardioversions, of which 1.8%, 1.2%, and 1.1% were positive for left atrial thrombi. Continuous treatment with study drug for ≥3 weeks before cardioversion was lower in D110 (76.4%) and D150 (79.2%) compared with warfarin (85.5%; P<0.01 for both). Stroke and systemic embolism rates at 30 days were 0.8%, 0.3%, and 0.6% (D110 versus warfarin, P=0.71; D150 versus warfarin, P=0.40) and similar in patients with and without transesophageal echocardiography. Major bleeding rates were 1.7%, 0.6%, and 0.6% (D110 versus warfarin, P=0.06; D150 versus warfarin, P=0.99).. This study is the largest cardioversion experience to date and the first to evaluate a novel anticoagulant in this setting. The frequencies of stroke and major bleeding within 30 days of cardioversion on the 2 doses of dabigatran were low and comparable to those on warfarin with or without transesophageal echocardiography guidance. Dabigatran is a reasonable alternative to warfarin in patients requiring cardioversion.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) randomized trial compared left atrial appendage closure against warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with CHADS₂ ≥1. Although the study met the primary efficacy end point of being noninferior to warfarin therapy for the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism/cardiovascular death, there was a significantly higher risk of complications, predominantly pericardial effusion and procedural stroke related to air embolism. Here, we report the influence of experience on the safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.. The study cohort for this analysis included patients in the PROTECT AF trial who underwent attempted device left atrial appendage closure (n=542 patients) and those from a subsequent nonrandomized registry of patients undergoing Watchman implantation (Continued Access Protocol [CAP] Registry; n=460 patients). The safety end point included bleeding- and procedure-related events (pericardial effusion, stroke, device embolization). There was a significant decline in the rate of procedure- or device-related safety events within 7 days of the procedure across the 2 studies, with 7.7% and 3.7% of patients, respectively, experiencing events (P=0.007), and between the first and second halves of PROTECT AF and CAP, with 10.0%, 5.5%, and 3.7% of patients, respectively, experiencing events (P=0.006). The rate of serious pericardial effusion within 7 days of implantation, which had made up >50% of the safety events in PROTECT AF, was lower in the CAP Registry (5.0% versus 2.2%, respectively; P=0.019). There was a similar experience-related improvement in procedure-related stroke (0.9% versus 0%, respectively; P=0.039). Finally, the functional impact of these safety events, as defined by significant disability or death, was statistically superior in the Watchman group compared with the warfarin group in PROTECT AF. This remained true whether significance was defined as a change in the modified Rankin score of ≥1, ≥2, or ≥3 (1.8 versus 4.3 events per 100 patient-years; relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.82; 1.5 versus 3.7 events per 100 patient-years; relative risk, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.82; and 1.4 versus 3.3 events per 100 patient-years; relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.88, respectively).. As with all interventional procedures, there is a significant improvement in the safety of Watchman left atrial appendage closure with increased operator experience. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Cardiac Catheterization; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardial Effusion; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Concern exists that preadmission warfarin use may be associated with an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with ischemic stroke receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, even in those with an international normalized ratio <1.7. However, evidence to date has been derived from a small single-center cohort of patients.. We used data from Phase 3 of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. We compared the rates of post-tissue plasminogen activator hemorrhage, including any intracerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with and without preadmission warfarin use. For those receiving warfarin, we restricted the analysis to patients with an international normalized ratio <1.7 on presentation. Secondary outcomes included functional status and mortality. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for other prognostic factors.. Our cohort included 1739 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator of whom 125 (7.2%) were receiving warfarin before admission and had an international normalized ratio <1.7. Preadmission warfarin use was not associated with any secondary intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.2), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.3), or gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.2 to 5.6). Multivariate analysis showed that preadmission warfarin use was independently associated with a reduced risk of poor functional outcome (OR, 0.6; 95 CI, 0.3 to 0.9), but not with in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.0).. The results from the present study suggest that tissue plasminogen activator treatment appears to be safe in patients with acute ischemic stroke taking warfarin with an international normalized ratio <1.7 and may reduce the risk of poor functional outcome.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cohort Studies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Warfarin

This study aimed to assess the impact of combination antithrombotic therapy on stroke and bleeding risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Post hoc analysis of 4,576 patients with AF (mean ± SD age, 70.1 ± 9.1 years; men, 66.5%) enrolled in the Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AMADEUS) trial were randomized to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) (n = 2,283) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) (n = 2,293). Of these patients, 848 (18.5%) received antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, etc) in addition to anticoagulation treatment (combination antithrombotic therapy).. A total of 572 (15.3% per year) clinically relevant bleeding and 103 (2.6% per year) major bleeding events occurred. Patients receiving combination antithrombotic therapy had a 2.3- to 2.5-fold increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding events and major bleeding events, respectively, compared with those receiving anticoagulation therapy only. Multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, 95% CI) revealed that the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly increased by age 65 to 74 years (1.44, 1.14-1.82) and ≥ 75 years (1.59, 1.24-2.04, P = .001) and by combination antithrombotic therapy (2.47, 2.07-2.96, P < .0001). The same held true for major bleeding events, with analogous figures for age 65 to 74 years (2.26, 1.08-4.71) and ≥ 75 years (4.19, 1.98-8.87, P = .0004) and for combination antithrombotic therapy (2.23, 1.49-3.34, P < .0001). Combination antithrombotic therapy was not associated with a decrease in ischemic stroke risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only (11 [1.4% per year] vs 22 [0.7% per year]; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.94-4.30; P = .07).. Combination antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of clinically relevant bleeding and major bleeding in patients with AF and does not appear to reduce the risk of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; England; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) is an international multicenter study (18,113 patients from 967 centers in 44 countries) that demonstrated the ability of dabigatran to reduce the occurrence of both stroke and hemorrhage in patients who had atrial fibrillation (AF) with high risks of stroke compared with patients who received warfarin. From Japan, 326 patients were randomized in RE-LY.. RE-LY was designed to compare 2 fixed doses (110 mg or 150 mg, twice daily) of dabigatran, each administered in a blinded manner, with open-label use of warfarin. There were no major differences in patient demographic information among the overall study population and Japanese patients. However, in Japanese patients, the proportion of prior stroke was higher but prior myocardial infarction was lower than in the overall. The yearly rate for the primary endpoints (stroke and systemic embolism) was 1.38, 0.67 and 2.65%/year for 110 mg and 150 mg dabigatran twice daily and warfarin, respectively. These results were similar to the overall results (1.54, 1.11 and 1.71%/year for each group, respectively). For any bleeding, the relative risk of dabigatran at 110 mg and 150 mg twice daily over warfarin was 0.79 and 1.06, respectively, which was similar to the findings overall (dabigatran 110 mg twice daily: 0.78; 150 mg twice daily: 0.91).. In RE-LY, the efficacy and safety profiles of dabigatran for Japanese AF patients at high risk of stroke were essentially the same as for the study population overall.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin reduce the risk of cardioembolic stroke by approximately two-thirds compared with no treatment, but are limited by their unpredictable anticoagulant effect and narrow therapeutic index. Warfarin therapy requires routine coagulation monitoring, which is inconvenient for patients and costly for the healthcare system. The limitations of the vitamin K agonists have spurred the development of new oral anticoagulants that selectively inhibit thrombin or factor Xa. The Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation (RE-LY) trial of 18,113 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke demonstrated that dabigatran etexilate given at a dose of 150 mg twice daily compared with warfarin, reduced the rate of stroke or systemic embolism by one-third with a similar rate of major bleeding, whereas dabigatran etexilate given at a dose of 110 mg twice daily compared with warfarin had a similar rate of stroke or systemic embolism and reduced the rate of major bleeding by one-fifth. Both doses of dabigatran etexilate reduced intracranial bleeding by approximately two-thirds compared with warfarin. Based on the results of the RE-LY trial, both the US FDA and Health Canada recently approved dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Embolism; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants are effective at reducing stroke compared with aspirin in atrial fibrillation patients older than 75 years. Although the benefits of reduced stroke risk outweigh the risks of bleeding, the cost effectiveness of warfarin in this patient population has not yet been established.. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized, controlled trial; 973 patients ≥75 years of age with atrial fibrillation were recruited from primary care and randomly assigned to either take warfarin or aspirin. Follow-up was for a mean of 2.7 years. Costs of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, anticoagulation clinic visits, and primary care utilization were determined. Clinical benefits were expressed in terms of a primary event avoided: fatal/nonfatal disabling stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or systemic embolism. A cost-utility analysis was performed using quality-adjusted life years as the benefit measure.. Total costs over 4 years were lower in the warfarin group (difference, -£165; 95% CI, -£452-£89), primarily driven by the difference in primary event costs. The primary event rate over 4 years was lower in the warfarin group (0.049 versus 0.099), and the quality-adjusted life years score was higher (difference, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.07-0.11). With lower costs and a higher quality-adjusted life years score, warfarin is the dominant treatment, but the differences in both costs and effects are small.. Warfarin is cost-effective compared with aspirin in atrial fibrillation patients age ≥75 years. These data support the anticoagulant therapy option in this high-risk patient population. However, the small differences in costs and effects indicate the importance of exploring patient preferences.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To compare the predictive power of the main existing and recently proposed schemes for stratification of risk of stroke in older patients with atrial fibrillation.. Comparative cohort study of eight risk stratification scores.. Trial of thromboprophylaxis in stroke, the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation in the Aged (BAFTA) trial.. 665 patients aged 75 or over with atrial fibrillation based in the community who were randomised to the BAFTA trial and were not taking warfarin throughout or for part of the study period.. Events rates of stroke and thromboembolism.. 54 (8%) patients had an ischaemic stroke, four (0.6%) had a systemic embolism, and 13 (2%) had a transient ischaemic attack. The distribution of patients classified into the three risk categories (low, moderate, high) was similar across three of the risk stratification scores (revised CHADS(2), NICE, ACC/AHA/ESC), with most patients categorised as high risk (65-69%, n = 460-457) and the remaining classified as moderate risk. The original CHADS(2) (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes, previous Stroke) score identified the lowest number as high risk (27%, n = 180). The incremental risk scores of CHADS(2), Rietbrock modified CHADS(2), and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (CHA(2)DS(2)-Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex) failed to show an increase in risk at the upper range of scores. The predictive accuracy was similar across the tested schemes with C statistic ranging from 0.55 (original CHADS(2)) to 0.62 (Rietbrock modified CHADS(2)), with all except the original CHADS(2) predicting better than chance. Bootstrapped paired comparisons provided no evidence of significant differences between the discriminatory ability of the schemes.. Based on this single trial population, current risk stratification schemes in older people with atrial fibrillation have only limited ability to predict the risk of stroke. Given the systematic undertreatment of older people with anticoagulation, and the relative safety of warfarin versus aspirin in those aged over 70, there could be a pragmatic rationale for classifying all patients over 75 as "high risk" until better tools are available.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

Antithrombotic medications (anticoagulants and antiplatelets) are often withheld in the periprocedural period and after bleeding complications to limit the risk of new or recurrent bleeding. These medications are also stopped by patients for various reasons such as cost, side effects, or unwillingness to take medication.. Patient records from the population-based Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study were reviewed to identify cases of ischemic stroke in 2005 and determine the temporal association of strokes with withdrawal of antithrombotic medication. Ischemic strokes and reasons for medication withdrawal were identified by study nurses for subsequent physician review.. In 2005, 2197 cases of ischemic stroke among residents of the region were identified through hospital discharge records. Of the 2197 ischemic strokes, 114 (5.2%) occurred within 60 days of an antithrombotic medication withdrawal, 61 (53.5%) of these after stoppage of warfarin and the remainder after stoppage of an antiplatelet medication. Of the strokes after withdrawal, 71 (62.3%) were first-ever and 43 (37.7%) were recurrent; 54 (47.4%) occurred after withdrawal of medication by a physician in the periprocedural period.. The withdrawal of antiplatelet and antithrombotic medications in the 60 days preceding an acute ischemic stroke was associated with 5.2% of ischemic strokes in our study population. This finding emphasizes the need for thoughtful decision-making concerning antithrombotic medication use in the periprocedural period and efforts to improve patient compliance.

Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Kentucky; Male; Ohio; Patient Compliance; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

Although therapeutic anticoagulation improves early (within 1 month) outcomes after ischemic stroke in hospital-admitted patients with atrial fibrillation, no information exists on late outcomes in unselected population-based studies, including patients with all stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic).. We identified patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke in a prospective, population-based study in North Dublin. Clinical characteristics, stroke subtype, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), prestroke antithrombotic medication, and International Normalized Ratio (INR) at onset were documented. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was measured before stroke and at 7, 28, and 90 days; 1 year; and 2 years after stroke.. One hundred seventy-five patients had atrial fibrillation-associated stroke and medication data at stroke onset (159 ischemic, 16 hemorrhagic); 17% of those with ischemic stroke were anticoagulated before stroke (27 of 159.) On multivariable analysis, therapeutic INR was associated with improved late survival after ischemic stroke (adjusted 2-year odds ratio for death=0.08; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.78; P=0.03). This survival benefit persisted when patients with hemorrhagic stroke were included (2-year survival; 70.5% therapeutic INR, 14.3% nontherapeutic INR; log-rank P<0.001; odds ratio for death=0.27; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.88; P=0.03). Admission INR was inversely correlated with early and late modified Rankin Scale score (2-year Spearman ρ=-0.65; P<0.0003). An INR of 2 to 3 at ischemic stroke onset was associated with greater early (72 hours to 28 days) modified Rankin Scale score improvement (P=0.04) and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score=0 to 2) at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio=4.8; 95% CI, 1.45 to 23.8; P=0.04).. In addition to improving short-term outcome in selected hospital-treated patient groups, therapeutic anticoagulation may provide important benefits for long-term stroke outcomes in unselected populations.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Ireland; Male; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Warfarin

Warfarin is a complex but highly effective treatment for decreasing thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined contemporary warfarin treatment rates in AF before the expected introduction of newer anticoagulants and extent of practice-level variation in warfarin use. Within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence program from July 2008 through December 2009, we identified 9,113 outpatients with AF from 20 sites who were at moderate to high risk for stroke (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke score >1) and would be optimally treated with warfarin. Using hierarchical models, the extent of site-level variation was quantified with the median rate ratio, which can be interpreted as the likelihood that 2 random practices would differ in treating "identical" patients with warfarin. Overall rate of warfarin treatment was only 55.1% (5,018 of 9,913). Untreated patients and treated patients had mean congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke scores of 2.5 (p = 0.38) and similar rates of heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and previous stroke, suggesting an almost "random" pattern of treatment. At the practice level, however, there was substantial variation in treatment ranging from 25% to 80% (interquartile range for practices 50 to 65), with a median rate ratio of 1.31 (1.22 to 1.55, p <0.001). In conclusion, within the Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry, we found that warfarin treatment in AF was suboptimal, with large variations in treatment observed across practices. Our findings suggest important opportunities for practice-level improvement in stroke prevention for outpatients with AF and define a benchmark treatment rate before the introduction of newer anticoagulant agents.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benchmarking; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Outpatients; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin.. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism.. In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but have several limitations. Apixaban is a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in a similar population in comparison with aspirin.. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary outcome was ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The trial was designed to test for noninferiority, with key secondary objectives of testing for superiority with respect to the primary outcome and to the rates of major bleeding and death from any cause.. The median duration of follow-up was 1.8 years. The rate of the primary outcome was 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.01 for superiority). The rate of major bleeding was 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; P<0.001), and the rates of death from any cause were 3.52% and 3.94%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P=0.047). The rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.24% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 0.47% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75; P<0.001), and the rate of ischemic or uncertain type of stroke was 0.97% per year in the apixaban group and 1.05% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13; P=0.42).. In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ARISTOTLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00412984.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal insufficiency are at increased risk for ischaemic stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor metabolized predominantly by the liver, preserves the benefit of warfarin for stroke prevention while causing fewer intracranial and fatal haemorrhages.. We randomized 14 264 patients with AF in a double-blind trial to rivaroxaban 20 mg/day [15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30-49 mL/min] or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0). Compared with patients with CrCl >50 mL/min (mean age 73 years), the 2950 (20.7%) patients with CrCl 30-49 mL/min were older (79 years) and had higher event rates irrespective of study treatment. Among those with CrCl 30-49 mL/min, the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 2.32 per 100 patient-years with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day vs. 2.77 per 100 patient-years with warfarin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.23] in the per-protocol population. Intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar results (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.17) to the per-protocol results. Rates of the principal safety endpoint (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding: 17.82 vs. 18.28 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.76) and intracranial bleeding (0.71 vs. 0.88 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.54) were similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Fatal bleeding (0.28 vs. 0.74% per 100 patient-years; P = 0.047) occurred less often with rivaroxaban.. Patients with AF and moderate renal insufficiency have higher rates of stroke and bleeding than those with normal renal function. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect across dosing groups. Dose adjustment in ROCKET-AF yielded results consistent with the overall trial in comparison with dose-adjusted warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The efficacy of adjusted-dose warfarin for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown.. Patients with stage 3 CKD participating in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation 3 trials were assessed to determine the effect of warfarin anticoagulation on stroke and major hemorrhage, and whether CKD status independently contributed to stroke risk. High-risk participants (n = 1044) in the randomized trial were assigned to adjusted-dose warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2 to 3) versus aspirin (325 mg) plus fixed, low-dose warfarin (subsequently shown to be equivalent to aspirin alone). Low-risk participants (n = 892) all received 325 mg aspirin daily. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke (96%) or systemic embolism (4%).. Among the 1936 participants in the two trials, 42% (n = 805) had stage 3 CKD at entry. Considering the 1314 patients not assigned to adjusted-dose warfarin, the primary event rate was double among those with stage 3 CKD (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.3) versus those with a higher estimated GFR (eGFR). Among the 516 participants with stage 3 CKD included in the randomized trial, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was reduced 76% (95% CI 42, 90; P < 0.001) by adjusted-dose warfarin compared with aspirin/low-dose warfarin; there was no difference in major hemorrhage (5 patients versus 6 patients, respectively).. Among atrial fibrillation patients participating in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III trials, stage 3 CKD was associated with higher rates of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism. Adjusted-dose warfarin markedly reduced ischemic stroke/systemic embolism in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with stage 3 CKD.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Canada; Chi-Square Distribution; Chronic Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Diseases; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

CHADS(2) is a simple, validated risk score for predicting the risk for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation not treated with anticoagulants. There are sparse data on the risk for thrombotic and bleeding complications according to the CHADS(2) score in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.. To evaluate the prognostic importance of CHADS(2) risk score in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants, including the vitamin K antagonist warfarin and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran.. Subgroup analysis of a randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00262600) SETTING: Multinational study setting.. 18 112 patients with atrial fibrillation who were receiving oral anticoagulants.. Baseline CHADS(2) score, which assigns 1 point each for congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years or older, and diabetes mellitus and 2 points for stroke.. Distribution of CHADS(2) scores were as follows: 0 to 1-5775 patients; 2-6455 patients; and 3 to 6-5882 patients. Annual rates of the primary outcome of stroke or systemic embolism among all participants were 0.93% in patients with a CHADS(2) score of 0 to 1, 1.22% in those with a score of 2, and 2.24% in those with a score of 3 to 6. Annual rates of other outcomes among all participants with CHADS(2) scores of 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 6, respectively, were the following: major bleeding, 2.26%, 3.11%, and 4.42%; intracranial bleeding, 0.31%, 0.40%, and 0.61%; and vascular mortality, 1.35%, 2.39%, and 3.68% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, major and intracranial bleeding, and vascular and total mortality each increased in the warfarin and dabigatran groups as CHADS(2) score increased. The rates of stroke or systemic embolism with dabigatran, 150 mg twice daily, and of intracranial bleeding with dabigatran, 150 mg or 110 mg twice daily, were lower than those with warfarin; there was no significant heterogeneity in subgroups defined by CHADS(2) scores.. These analyses were not prespecified and should be deemed exploratory.. Higher CHADS(2) scores were associated with increased risks for stroke or systemic embolism, bleeding, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants.. Boehringer Ingelheim.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor, does not require blood coagulation monitoring and limitation of vitamin K intake as well as very few drug interactions, and thus expected to be an oral anticoagulant alternative to warfarin. Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) was conducted to determine non-inferiority of dabigatran against warfarin as an international multicenter-cooperative randomized trial in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The results showed not only non-inferiority of dabigatran but also superiority of high-dose dabigatran in efficacy and of low-dose dabigatran in safety. In a sub-analysis of RE-LY in NVAF patients with history of stroke or TIA, who are at high risk of intracranial hemorrhage with anticoagulants, hemorrhagic stroke was much less frequent in patients on either dose of dabigatran than in those on warfarin. In a sub-analysis of RE-LY in Japanese patients with NVAF, the results showed a consistency of the efficacy and safety profiles of dabigatran with the results of the global RE-LY trial. Use of dabigatran should be contraindicated in NVAF patients with renal insufficiency because some cases with fatal bleeding have been reported in a post marketing survey.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Stroke; Warfarin

It has been observed that elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) benefit from standard [an international normalised ratio (INR) goal of 2.0-3.0] oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). The hypothesis that lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy can offset the higher bleeding risk in this population has never been tested in an 'ad hoc' clinical trial. Patients over 75 years of age with NVAF were randomised to receive warfarin to maintain the INR at 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) or at a standard target of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0). There were 135 patients in the low-intensity and 132 in the standard-intensity groups. During a mean follow-up lasting 5.1 years, 59 primary outcome events (thromboembolism and major haemorrhage) were recorded, 24 (3.5 per 100 patient-years) in the low-intensity group and 35 (5.0 per 100 patient-years) in the standard-intensity group (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1, p=0.1). The reduction in the primary endpoint was mainly due to a diminution in major bleedings (1.9 vs. 3.0 per 100 patient-years; HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.1). The median achieved INR value was 1.86 in the low-intensity and 2.24 in the standard-intensity group (p<0.001). The frequency of INR testing was 26.1 +/- 13.5 vs. 24.3 +/- 11.6 days, p<0.0001). In this exploratory study we observed a low rate of stroke and major bleeding in elderly patients (>75) being managed in an anticoagulation clinic for primary stroke prevention with low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.5-2.0). However, further trials are needed to confirm the hypothesis generated by the present study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

AZD0837 is an investigational oral anticoagulant which is converted to the active form, AR-H067637, a selective direct thrombin inhibitor. The present study, a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, dose-guiding study, assessed the safety and tolerability of an immediate-release formulation of AZD0837 compared with dose-adjusted warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Two hundred fifty AF patients with at least one additional risk factor for stroke were randomised to receive either immediate-release AZD0837 (150mg twice daily [bid] or 350mg bid, blinded treatment) or dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalised ratio 2.0-3.0, open treatment) for three months. The safety and tolerability of 150mg bid AZD0837 appeared to be as good as that of warfarin. Total bleeding events were six with 150mg bid AZD0837, 15 with 350mg bid AZD0837 and eight with warfarin. Alanine aminotransferase elevations (>3xupper limit of normal) were infrequent, without apparent differences between treatment groups. A numerically higher incidence of serious adverse events was observed with 350mg bid AZD0837 compared with 150mg bid, with six of 13 being cardiac related, all with different diagnoses. An increase in mean serum creatinine of approximately 10% was observed in both AZD0837 groups, which returned to baseline after completion of therapy. There were no strokes, transient ischaemic attacks or cerebral haemorrhages with any of the treatments. In conclusion, the safety and tolerability of 150mg bid immediate-release AZD0837 appeared to be as good as that of dose-adjusted warfarin. However, larger studies will be needed to define the safety profile of AZD0837.

Topics: Amidines; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Serine Proteinase Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants such as warfarin have been used widely for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Warfarin has significant limitations and also requires frequent monitoring. Thus, there is an unmet need, with the quest for alternative oral anticoagulants with stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that do not need monitoring. The paper under evaluation provides us with up-to-date information on the safety and efficacy of a new oral anticoagulant, dabigatran, compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in AF patients.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the current era of early revascularization and routine use of dual antiplatelet therapy, the incremental benefit of warfarin to reduce the incidence of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction post anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (aSTEMI), remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of evaluating the added benefit and safety of triple therapy (TT-warfarin, ASA, and clopidogrel) versus dual therapy (DT-ASA and clopidogrel) in patients at risk of LVT post aSTEMI.. Open-label randomized controlled trial.. aSTEMI, ejection fraction <40%, and no evidence of LVT. EXCLUSION: contraindication to, or alternate indication for anticoagulation.. TT versus DT.. pre-discharge and 3 month echocardiogram.. composite of death, MI, stroke, systemic embolizarion, LVT or major bleeding at three months. 295 patients with aSTEMI were screened: 27% of patients with LVEF < 40% had an LVT; 20/52 eligible patients were randomized to receive TT (n = 10) or DT (n = 10). Baseline characteristics: mean age 60 years, male gender 65%, diabetics 20%, and in hospital PCI 95%. There was no significant difference in the composite endpoint at 3 months (TT-20% with 1 LVT and 1 major bleed versus DT-10% with 1 MI). The incidence of definite or probable LVT in the screened population of patients post aSTEMI with an LVEF < 40% was 26.6% despite 94% having early revascularization. STEMI patients have a high incidence of LVT despite the routine use of early revascularization and dual antiplatelet therapy. More effective antithrombotic strategies merit evaluation in adequately powered randomized trials.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Feasibility Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Ontario; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Warfarin

The aim of this project was to determine whether a tailored multifaceted intervention aimed at site-specific barriers is more effective than audit feedback alone for improving adherence to inhospital stroke performance measures (PMs): door to needle time of less than 1 hour for tissue plasminogen activator, dysphagia screening, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and warfarin treatment for atrial fibrillation.. Hospitals were paired on baseline adherence to dysphagia screening and quality improvement infrastructure and randomized to receive audit feedback alone (n=7) versus audit feedback plus site-specific interventions (n=6). Data were collected on all admitted patients with stroke seen in the neurology department before and after a 6-month implementation period. The primary end point was the difference in postintervention adherence rates for each PM, except tissue plasminogen activator because of low sample size.. Data were collected on 2071 preintervention patients and 1240 postintervention patients. Targeted site-specific interventions, such as standing orders and standardized dysphagia screens, were imperfectly implemented during the 6-month intervention period. For atrial fibrillation, the intervention group had an 11% higher postintervention adherence rate beyond that of the control group (98% v 87%, P < .005). No other statistically significant changes in PM adherence were observed.. Implementation of site-specific interventions for quality improvement of specific measures in stroke was difficult to achieve in a 6-month time frame and led to improved adherence for only one of 3 PMs. Studies with a longer intervention period and more sites are required to determine whether tailored interventions can enhance stroke improvement.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Combined Modality Therapy; Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities; Deglutition Disorders; Emergency Medical Services; Emergency Service, Hospital; Feedback; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Mass Screening; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Quality of Health Care; Stroke; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of stroke that can be attenuated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Vitamin K antagonist use is limited, in part, by the high incidence of complications when patients' international normalized ratios (INRs) deviate from the target range. The primary objective of ARISTOTLE is to determine if the factor Xa inhibitor, apixaban, is noninferior to warfarin at reducing the combined endpoint of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism in patients with AF and at least 1 additional risk factor for stroke. We have randomized 18,206 patients from over 1,000 centers in 40 countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive apixaban or warfarin using a double-blind, double-dummy design. International normalized ratios are monitored and warfarin (or placebo) is adjusted aiming for a target INR range of 2 to 3 using a blinded, encrypted point-of-care device. Minimum treatment is 12 months, and maximum expected exposure is 4 years. Time to accrual of at least 448 primary efficacy events will determine treatment duration. The key secondary objectives are to determine if apixaban is superior to warfarin for the combined endpoint of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism, and for all-cause death. These will be tested after the primary objective using a closed test procedure. The noninferiority boundary is 1.38; apixaban will be declared noninferior if the 95% CI excludes the possibility that the primary outcome rate with apixaban is >1.38 times higher than with warfarin. ARISTOTLE will determine whether apixaban is noninferior or superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism; whether apixaban has particular benefits in the warfarin-naïve population; whether it reduces the combined rate of stroke, systemic embolism, and death; and whether it impacts bleeding.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Research Design; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate or high risk for stroke are not treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Presently, the only alternative to a VKA with a labeled indication for AF is antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), which is much less effective than a VKA for prevention of stroke. The novel oral factor Xa inhibitor, apixaban, is being developed for prevention of stroke in AF. A noninferiority trial of apixaban versus a VKA (warfarin) is being conducted but does not address the large unmet need of AF patients at risk of stroke who are unsuitable for or unwilling to take a VKA. Apixaban may be an attractive alternative to ASA for prevention of stroke in patients with AF who cannot or will not take a VKA.. AVERROES is a double-blind, double-dummy superiority trial of apixaban 5 mg twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily in selected patients) compared with ASA 81 to 324 mg once daily in patients with AF and at least 1 risk factor for stroke who have failed or are unsuitable for VKA therapy. The primary outcome is stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome is major bleeding. The trial is event driven and is expected to enroll at least 5,600 patients.. By evaluating the use of apixaban as a replacement for ASA in AF patients who are not treated with a VKA, the AVERROES study is addressing an important unmet clinical need. The results of AVERROES will be complementary to those of a parallel noninferiority trial comparing apixaban with VKA therapy in patients with AF who are able to receive a VKA.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Research Design; Retreatment; Stroke; Treatment Failure; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common significant cardiac arrhythmia, increases the risk of stroke, particularly in the elderly. Warfarin is effective in reducing stroke risk but is burdensome to patients and is difficult to control. Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.. ROCKET AF is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trial, which aims to establish the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a history of stroke or at least 2 additional independent risk factors for future stroke. Patients are randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (od), or dose-adjusted warfarin titrated to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0, inclusive) using point-of-care INR devices to receive true or sham INR values, depending on the study drug allocation. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of all-cause stroke and noncentral nervous system systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Over 14,000 patients have been randomized at 1,100 sites across 45 countries, and will be followed until 405 primary outcome events are observed.. The ROCKET AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medical Records; Morpholines; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the risk of thromboembolism is a significant concern. However, the reported use of warfarin among patients with AF at elevated risk of stroke remains low. In the present study, we have provided information on anticoagulation use reported during the recent Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on Effective Clinical Treatment Strategies (AFFECTS) Registry. Among patients identified by their physician at baseline to be at an increased risk of stroke, as determined from an assessment of the medical history, 74% received warfarin and 29% received aspirin. Post hoc analysis of warfarin use stratified by Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke, (CHADS(2)) doubled score revealed that at the end of the study, warfarin use was 73% (155 of 213) and 66% (185 of 280) in the rate- and rhythm-control patients with a score of > or = 2, respectively, compared to 60% (183 of 306) and 49% (322 of 662) in the rate- and rhythm-control patients with a score of <2, respectively. The practicing cardiologists who participated in this registry initiated anticoagulation therapy in most of their patients with AF. However, warfarin use is not yet in line with the guidelines and evidence-based recommendations. Patients considered at no risk of stroke appear to have been overprescribed anticoagulant agents, and a considerable portion of high-risk patients did not receive warfarin. In conclusion, these results suggest that continued physician education of appropriate anticoagulation use in patients with AF is needed.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiology; Decision Making; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Incidence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Workforce

The primary objective of this study was to compare the safety of four fixed-dose regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In this 12-week, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational study, 1,146 patients with AF and risk of stroke were randomised to edoxaban 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, 60 mg qd, or 60 mg bid or warfarin dose-adjusted to a target international normalised ratio of 2.0-3.0. The study was double-blind to edoxaban dose, but open-label to warfarin. Primary outcomes were occurrence of major and/or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and elevated hepatic enzymes and/or bilirubin. Mean age was 65 +/- 8.7 years and 64.4% were warfarin-naïve. Whereas major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 3.2% of patients randomised to warfarin, the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher with the edoxaban 60 mg bid (10.6%; p=0.002) and 30 mg bid regimens (7.8%; p=0.029), but not with the edoxaban 60 mg qd (3.8%) or 30 mg qd regimens (3.0%). For the same total daily dose of 60 mg, both bleeding frequency and trough edoxaban concentrations were higher in the 30-mg bid group than in the 60-mg qd group. There were no significant differences in hepatic enzyme elevations or bilirubin values among the groups. The safety profiles of edoxaban 30 and 60 mg qd in patients with AF were similar to warfarin. In contrast, the edoxaban bid regimens were associated with more bleeding than warfarin. These results suggest that in this three-month study, edoxaban 30 or 60 mg qd are safe and well-tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Anticoagulants; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Atrial Fibrillation; Bilirubin; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Europe, Eastern; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin