ketamine and Nausea
ketamine has been researched along with Nausea in 37 studies
Ketamine: A cyclohexanone derivative used for induction of anesthesia. Its mechanism of action is not well understood, but ketamine can block NMDA receptors (RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE) and may interact with sigma receptors.
ketamine : A member of the class of cyclohexanones in which one of the hydrogens at position 2 is substituted by a 2-chlorophenyl group, while the other is substituted by a methylamino group.
Nausea: An unpleasant sensation in the stomach usually accompanied by the urge to vomit. Common causes are early pregnancy, sea and motion sickness, emotional stress, intense pain, food poisoning, and various enteroviruses.
Research Excerpts
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine (MK) versus morphine plus placebo (MP) in patients with acute renal colic." | 9.30 | Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. ( Bozorgi, F; Erfanian Irankar, S; Hosseini, SA; Hosseininejad, SM; Jahanian, F; Moosazadeh, M; Shahbakhti, N, 2019) |
"Esketamine is a promising drug which can induce antidepressant effects in Major Depression Disorder (MDD)." | 9.22 | Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, G; Li, X; Wang, J; Wang, T; Xu, X; Xu, Z; Yang, S; Zhou, X, 2022) |
"The results suggested that it is possible to improve symptoms of depression earlier by using ketamine anesthesia." | 9.14 | Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. ( Higuchi, T; Nagafusa, Y; Nakai, T; Nishikawa, T; Okamoto, N; Sakamoto, K, 2010) |
"S(+)-ketamine reduced both postanesthetic shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting, when administered for postoperative analgosedation." | 9.13 | Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery. ( Beschmann, RB; Boldt, J; Maleck, WH; Mengistu, A; Piper, SN; Röhm, KD, 2008) |
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with ketamine/esketamine are dissociation, anxiety, nausea, increased blood pressure, and headache." | 6.72 | Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders. ( Cao, B; Ceban, F; Chau, EH; Gill, H; Ho, RC; Kratiuk, K; Kumar, A; Lee, JG; Lee, Y; Lin, K; Lipsitz, O; Lui, LMW; Mansur, RB; McIntyre, RS; Nasri, F; Rodrigues, NB; Rosenblat, JD; Subramaniapillai, M; Swainson, J, 2021) |
" The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus was not significantly different in all three groups, although all patients who received ketamine experienced drowsiness after surgery (p<0." | 5.41 | Comparison of Intravenous Ketamine with Intrathecal Meperidine in Prevention of Post-anesthetic Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Baradari, AG; Gholinataj, A; Kiabi, FH; Najafi, S, 2021) |
" This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine (MK) versus morphine plus placebo (MP) in patients with acute renal colic." | 5.30 | Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. ( Bozorgi, F; Erfanian Irankar, S; Hosseini, SA; Hosseininejad, SM; Jahanian, F; Moosazadeh, M; Shahbakhti, N, 2019) |
" Compared with the control group, ketamine provided significant reduction of postoperative depression scale scores, by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0." | 5.22 | The effect of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery: A systematic review. ( Ai, P; An, D; Cui, V; Shi, H; Sun, Y; Wang, J; Wei, C; Wu, A, 2022) |
"Esketamine is a promising drug which can induce antidepressant effects in Major Depression Disorder (MDD)." | 5.22 | Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, G; Li, X; Wang, J; Wang, T; Xu, X; Xu, Z; Yang, S; Zhou, X, 2022) |
" Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) has the advantages of being a sedative agent that does not require a painful injection and that offers shallower levels of sedation and a rapid recovery of mental state." | 5.16 | A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide versus intravenous ketamine for laceration repair in children. ( Eun, SC; Heo, CY; Jo, YH; Kim, K; Kim, SH; Kim, TY; Lee, JH; Rhee, JE, 2012) |
"The results suggested that it is possible to improve symptoms of depression earlier by using ketamine anesthesia." | 5.14 | Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. ( Higuchi, T; Nagafusa, Y; Nakai, T; Nishikawa, T; Okamoto, N; Sakamoto, K, 2010) |
"S(+)-ketamine reduced both postanesthetic shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting, when administered for postoperative analgosedation." | 5.13 | Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery. ( Beschmann, RB; Boldt, J; Maleck, WH; Mengistu, A; Piper, SN; Röhm, KD, 2008) |
"05 mg kg(-1) +droperidol 20 microg kg(-1) was given as prophylaxis for postoperative pain and emesis, respectively." | 5.08 | Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ( Aasbø, V; Buanes, T; Grøgaard, B; Mjåland, O; Raeder, JC, 1998) |
"We report difficulty with conscious sedation of a child taking methylphenidate for attention deficit disorder and possible delayed adverse interaction of ketamine and methylphenidate resulting in severe nausea, vomiting and dehydration." | 3.69 | Unexpected interaction of methylphenidate (Ritalin) with anaesthetic agents. ( Fox, L; Ririe, DG; Ririe, KL; Sethna, NF, 1997) |
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with ketamine/esketamine are dissociation, anxiety, nausea, increased blood pressure, and headache." | 2.72 | Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders. ( Cao, B; Ceban, F; Chau, EH; Gill, H; Ho, RC; Kratiuk, K; Kumar, A; Lee, JG; Lee, Y; Lin, K; Lipsitz, O; Lui, LMW; Mansur, RB; McIntyre, RS; Nasri, F; Rodrigues, NB; Rosenblat, JD; Subramaniapillai, M; Swainson, J, 2021) |
"Postoperative pain was rated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively by visual analogue scale scores (VAS)." | 2.70 | Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ( Argiriadou, H; Georgiou, M; Papagiannopoulou, P; Papaziogas, B; Papaziogas, T; Pavlidis, T; Sfyra, E, 2001) |
"IVPCA ketamine in combination with morphine provides superior postsurgical pain relief at lower dosage and with fewer side effects than morphine alone." | 2.68 | Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia. ( Colclough, GW; Javery, KB; Steger, HG; Ussery, TW, 1996) |
"Ketamine 1." | 2.65 | Effect of diazepam on emergence from ketamine anaesthesia. A double-blind study. ( Larni, HM; Mattila, MA; Nummi, SE; Pekkola, PO, 1979) |
" It also reviews the comparative pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and dosing of ketamine, propofol, and ketofol as agents for procedural sedation and analgesia." | 2.48 | Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. ( Alletag, MJ; Auerbach, MA; Baum, CR, 2012) |
" Studying its effects in clinics can be expected to increase our knowledge necessary for the development of new, effective, and safe "antineuralgic drug." | 1.35 | Side effects of ketamine in the long-term treatment of neuropathic pain. ( Cvrcek, P, 2008) |
"Ketamine hydrochloride was administered intravenously (at a dose of two milligrams per kilogram of body weight) in ninety-nine of the patients and intramuscularly (at a dose of four milligrams per kilogram of body weight) in the other fifteen." | 1.31 | Ketamine sedation for the reduction of children's fractures in the emergency department. ( Green, NE; McCarty, EC; Mencio, GA; Walker, LA, 2000) |
Research
Studies (37)
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 13 (35.14) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 5 (13.51) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 6 (16.22) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 5 (13.51) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 8 (21.62) | 2.80 |
Authors
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Wang, J | 2 |
Sun, Y | 1 |
Ai, P | 1 |
Cui, V | 1 |
Shi, H | 1 |
An, D | 1 |
Wu, A | 1 |
Wei, C | 1 |
Gholinataj, A | 1 |
Baradari, AG | 1 |
Najafi, S | 1 |
Kiabi, FH | 1 |
Williamson, DJ | 1 |
Gogate, JP | 1 |
Kern Sliwa, JK | 1 |
Manera, LS | 1 |
Preskorn, SH | 1 |
Winokur, A | 1 |
Starr, HL | 1 |
Daly, EJ | 1 |
Firouzian, A | 1 |
Faghani-Makrani, N | 1 |
Nazari, Z | 1 |
Ahangari, MF | 1 |
Chaghazardi, S | 1 |
Hedari, M | 1 |
Bazargan-Hejazi, S | 1 |
Mohammadi, R | 1 |
Ahmadi, A | 1 |
Ben-Yakov, M | 1 |
Bhatt, M | 1 |
Yang, S | 1 |
Li, X | 1 |
Wang, T | 1 |
Xu, Z | 1 |
Xu, X | 1 |
Zhou, X | 1 |
Chen, G | 1 |
Ceban, F | 1 |
Rosenblat, JD | 1 |
Kratiuk, K | 1 |
Lee, Y | 1 |
Rodrigues, NB | 1 |
Gill, H | 1 |
Subramaniapillai, M | 1 |
Nasri, F | 1 |
Lui, LMW | 1 |
Lipsitz, O | 1 |
Kumar, A | 1 |
Lee, JG | 1 |
Chau, EH | 1 |
Cao, B | 1 |
Lin, K | 1 |
Ho, RC | 1 |
Mansur, RB | 1 |
Swainson, J | 1 |
McIntyre, RS | 1 |
Hayes, J | 1 |
Matava, C | 1 |
Pehora, C | 1 |
El-Beheiry, H | 1 |
Jarvis, S | 1 |
Finkelstein, Y | 1 |
Hosseininejad, SM | 1 |
Jahanian, F | 1 |
Erfanian Irankar, S | 1 |
Moosazadeh, M | 1 |
Hosseini, SA | 1 |
Shahbakhti, N | 1 |
Bozorgi, F | 1 |
Dilli, D | 1 |
Dallar, Y | 1 |
Sorgui, NH | 1 |
Piper, SN | 1 |
Beschmann, RB | 1 |
Mengistu, A | 1 |
Maleck, WH | 1 |
Boldt, J | 1 |
Röhm, KD | 1 |
Okamoto, N | 1 |
Nakai, T | 1 |
Sakamoto, K | 1 |
Nagafusa, Y | 1 |
Higuchi, T | 1 |
Nishikawa, T | 1 |
Lee, JH | 1 |
Kim, K | 1 |
Kim, TY | 1 |
Jo, YH | 1 |
Kim, SH | 1 |
Rhee, JE | 1 |
Heo, CY | 1 |
Eun, SC | 1 |
Alletag, MJ | 1 |
Auerbach, MA | 1 |
Baum, CR | 1 |
Cvrcek, P | 1 |
Sanders, B | 1 |
Lankenau, SE | 1 |
Bloom, JJ | 1 |
Hathazi, D | 1 |
Barclay, A | 1 |
Houlton, PC | 1 |
Downing, JW | 2 |
Shpilenia, LS | 1 |
Geist, ET | 1 |
Gross, BD | 1 |
Javery, KB | 1 |
Ussery, TW | 1 |
Steger, HG | 1 |
Colclough, GW | 1 |
Lauretti, GR | 1 |
Azevedo, VM | 1 |
Ririe, DG | 1 |
Ririe, KL | 1 |
Sethna, NF | 1 |
Fox, L | 1 |
Raeder, JC | 1 |
Mjåland, O | 1 |
Aasbø, V | 1 |
Grøgaard, B | 1 |
Buanes, T | 1 |
Chia, YY | 1 |
Liu, K | 1 |
Liu, YC | 1 |
Chang, HC | 1 |
Wong, CS | 1 |
McCarty, EC | 1 |
Mencio, GA | 1 |
Walker, LA | 1 |
Green, NE | 1 |
Papaziogas, B | 1 |
Argiriadou, H | 1 |
Papagiannopoulou, P | 1 |
Pavlidis, T | 1 |
Georgiou, M | 1 |
Sfyra, E | 1 |
Papaziogas, T | 1 |
Sportelli, S | 1 |
Zocco, C | 1 |
Margaria, E | 1 |
Lovera, C | 1 |
Mattila, MA | 1 |
Larni, HM | 1 |
Nummi, SE | 1 |
Pekkola, PO | 1 |
Hejja, P | 1 |
Galloon, S | 1 |
Ghoneim, MM | 1 |
Hinrichs, JV | 1 |
Mewaldt, SP | 1 |
Petersen, RC | 1 |
Fiorani, V | 1 |
Petterino, E | 1 |
Meer, FM | 1 |
Coleman, AJ | 1 |
Kramer, RJ | 1 |
Roper, AL | 1 |
Dillon, JB | 1 |
Wakisaka, K | 1 |
Inagaki, M | 1 |
Saito, T | 1 |
Clinical Trials (13)
Trial Overview
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
An Open-label, Long-term, Safety and Efficacy Study of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02497287] | Phase 3 | 802 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Study of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant for Relapse Prevention in Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02493868] | Phase 3 | 719 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-01 | Completed | ||
Co-administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy in Children: a Dose-finding Study[NCT02295553] | Phase 4 | 56 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial Using Ketamine or Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Improving Treatment-Resistant Depression[NCT01935115] | Phase 4 | 27 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-09-30 | Completed | ||
Effects of Low-dose Ketamine as an Adjunct to Propofol-based Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy[NCT02579642] | Phase 4 | 48 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-31 | Completed | ||
Comparing Therapeutic Efficacy and Cognitive Side Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Using Ketamine Versus Methohexital Anesthesia[NCT01881763] | Phase 4 | 31 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
Comparison of N2O Inhalation and Ketamine IV Injection for Sedation in the Treatment of Laceration of Pediatric Patients.[NCT00834730] | Phase 4 | 32 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Completed | ||
The Use of Ketamine as Rescue Analgesia in the Recovery Room Following Opioid Administration. A Double-blind Randomised Trial in Postoperative Patients.[NCT00163969] | Phase 4 | 40 participants | Interventional | 2002-04-30 | Completed | ||
PCA Ketamine-Morphine Versus PCA Morphine as Post-Operative Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery.[NCT06010056] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-05 | Completed | ||
PCA Ketamine-Morphine Versus PCA Morphine as Post-Operative Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery[NCT06021717] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-05 | Completed | ||
Comparison of Intravenous Push Dose of Low Dose Ketamine to Short Infusion of Low Dose Ketamine for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study[NCT02363270] | 48 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-04-01 | Completed | |||
Low Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Moderate to Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study[NCT01835262] | Phase 4 | 90 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Completed | ||
Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Control During First Trimester Surgical Abortion[NCT03751423] | Phase 3 | 123 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2019-06-10 | Suspended (stopped due to Study on-hold due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Will resume when possible.) | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Trial Outcomes
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Detection Test (DET) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. The DET is a measure of psychomotor function and uses a well-validated simple reaction time. In this outcome measure, speed of performance of participants (calculated as mean of the logarithmic base 10 transformed reaction times) for correct responses was reported. Total score ranges from 2 to 3.3 log 10 milliseconds (msec). Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of Optimization/Maintenance [OP/MA] Phase)
Intervention | log10 msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -0.0028 |
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. GMLT measures executive function; maze/sequencing test, scored for total number of errors. Total score ranges from 0 to 999 number of errors. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Number of Errors (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 6.9 |
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Identification Test (IDN) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. IDN test is a measure of visual attention (choice reaction time) and scored for speed of response (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranges from 2 to 3.3 log 10 msec. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | log10 msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -0.0083 |
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: One Back Test (ONB) Score
The ONB is a measure of working memory and scored for speed of correct response (mean of the log10-transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranges from 2 to 3.54 log10 msec. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | log10 msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.0177 |
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: One Card Learning Test (OCL) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. OCL test is a measure of visual episodic memory and visual recall test scored using arcsine transformation of the percentage of correct responses (CR). The range for OCL is 0 to 100 percent (%) accuracy; presented as an arcsin transformation, the range is 0 to 1.57. Higher score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Arcsine ([sqrt] of proportion of [CR]) (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.0502 |
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Delayed Recall
HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Number correct (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.8 |
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Number of Words Recalled
HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Number of words recalled (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.3 |
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Recognition Discrimination Index
HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Number of words (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.5 |
Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Total Recall
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Number correct (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 2.8 |
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score During IND Phase
"SDS was a 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0 to 10 rating scale. Score for the first three items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30, higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND Phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -9.3 |
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score During OP/MA Phase
"SDS was a participant-reported outcome measure and was a 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0 to 10 rating scale. The score for the first three items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -1.6 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in CGI-S Scale Score During OP/MA Phase
"The CGI-S measures the severity of the participant's illness that include knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7, where 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.0 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score During IND Phase
"CGI-S measures severity of participant's illness that include knowledge of participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, impact of symptoms on participant's ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on a scale range from 0 - 7, where 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -2.0 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Scale Score During IND Phase: Health Status Index
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.190 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Scale Score During OP/MA Phase: Health Status Index
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -0.009 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Score During IND Phase: EQ-VAS
EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 17.0 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Score During OP/MA Phase: EQ-VAS
EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 1.6 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ 5D-5L) During IND Phase: Sum Score
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -15.3 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ 5D-5L) During OP/MA Phase: Sum Score
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -0.7 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in GAD-7 Total Score During OP/MA Phase
"GAD-7 is brief and validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score ranges from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate more anxiety. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Severe (15 -21). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.2 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Total Score During IND Phase
"GAD-7 is brief, validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participant's responded to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield total score ranges from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate more anxiety. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Severity of GAD-7 is categorized as: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Severe (15 -21). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method, last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -5.9 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in MADRS Total Score During Optimization/Maintenance (OP/MA) Phase
"MADRS measure depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It evaluates 10 items: apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.3 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score During Induction (IND) Phase
"MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -16.4 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) Total Score During IND Phase
"PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Unit on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -8.9 |
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in PHQ-9 Total Score During OP/MA Phase
"PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | -0.2 |
Percentage of Participants With an Increase Score From Predose at Any Time in CADSS Total Score During OP/MA Phase
"The CADSS used to measure present-state dissociative symptoms, and to assess treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms. It comprises 23 subjective items divided into 3 components: depersonalization (with score range from 0 to 28), derealization (with score range from 0 to 52), and amnesia (with score range from 0 to 8). Participants responses are coded on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = 'Severe and 4 = Extreme). The total score is sum of the 23 items and range from 0 to 92, where 0 (best) and 92 (worst). A higher score indicates a more severe condition." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Predose, up to 1.5 hours postdose (up to end of OP/MA phase [Week 52])
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 86.1 |
Percentage of Participants With an Increase Score From Predose at Any Time in Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) Total Score During IND Phase
"The CADSS used to measure present-state dissociative symptoms, and to assess treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms. It comprises 23 subjective items divided into 3 components: depersonalization (with score range from 0 to 28), derealization (with score range from 0 to 52), and amnesia (with score range from 0 to 8). Participants responses are coded on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = 'Severe and 4 = Extreme). The total score is sum of the 23 items and range from 0 to 92, where 0 (best) and 92 (worst). A higher score indicates a more severe condition." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Predose, up to 1.5 hours postdose (up to end of IND phase [Week 4])
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 92.0 |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants who administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A TEAE defined as an event that was new in onset or increased in severity following treatment initiation. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of Follow up Phase (Week 56)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 90.1 |
Percentage of Participants With Cystitis, Urinary Tract Infections, Renal and Urinary Tract Symptoms, Renal and Urinary Disorders
"Percentage of participants with cystitis, urinary tract infections, renal and urinary tract symptoms, renal and urinary disorders were evaluated. Cystitis and urinary tract infections are selected MedDRA preferred terms, renal and urinary tract symptoms refers to any preferred term (PT) in the group of selected PTs; and renal and urinary disorders refers to a MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of Follow up Phase (Week 56)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cystitis | Urinary tract infections | Renal and urinary disorders | Renal and urinary tract symptoms | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 0.6 | 8.1 | 10.5 | 17.0 |
Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by MADRS Total Score During IND Phase
"Remission is defined as MADRS total score less than or equal to (<=) 12. MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Days 8, 15, 22 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND Phase)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 8 | Day 15 | Day 22 | End point | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 7.3 | 15.6 | 27.2 | 47.2 |
Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by PHQ-9 Total Score During IND Phase
"Remission is defined as PHQ-9 total score <= 4. PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Day 15 | Endpoint | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 12.7 | 26.9 |
Percentage of Participants With Response as Assessed by MADRS Total Score During IND Phase
"Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 % reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score. MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Days 8, 15, 22 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment during 4 weeks of IND phase)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 8 | Day 15 | Day 22 | End point | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 11.6 | 25.0 | 42.8 | 78.4 |
Percentage of Participants With Response as Assessed by PHQ-9 Total Score During IND Phase
"Response is defined as >= 50 % reduction from baseline (IND phase) in PHQ-9 total score. PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 Week IND phase)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Day 15 | End point | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 37.2 | 62.0 |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Acute Hypertension (Systolic and Diastolic) During IND and OP/MA Phases
Percentage of participants with treatment-emergent acute hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure >=180 millimeters of mercury [mm Hg] or Diastolic Blood Pressure >= 110 mm Hg) during IND and OP/MA Phases were evaluated. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of OP/MA phase (Week 52)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Systolic BP >=180 | Diastolic BP >=110 | Acute hypertension | |
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant | 2.2 | 2.4 | 4.1 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The change from baseline in CGI-S score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 0.0 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 1.0 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The change from baseline in CGI-S score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 0.0 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 1.0 |
Change From Baseline in EQ Visual Analogue Scale Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at the time of completion, on a scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | -10.4 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | -16.1 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L EQ Visual Analogue Scale Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at the time of completion, on a scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | -1.3 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | -13.8 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Index at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
"EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health)." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | -0.067 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | -0.096 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Index at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
"EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health)." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | -0.023 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | -0.073 |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Sum Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 7.5 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 10.9 |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level Sum Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 3.0 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 8.4 |
Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Items (GAD-7) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-report assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15 -21). Item responses are summed to yield a total score (range of 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The change from baseline in GAD-7 total score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 2.2 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 4.0 |
Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Items Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-report assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15 -21). Item responses are summed to yield a total score (range of 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The change from baseline in GAD-7 total score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 1.4 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 2.6 |
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal - severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. The change from baseline in MADRS total score (last observation carried forward [LOCF] data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 7.5 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 12.5 |
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal - severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. The change from baseline in MADRS total score (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 4.4 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 11.4 |
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19) and severe (20-27). The change from baseline in PHQ-9 total score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 3.3 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 5.9 |
Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19) and severe (20-27). The change from baseline in PHQ-9 total score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 1.7 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 4.7 |
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and is a 5-item questionnaire used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1: work/school 2: social life 3: family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when underproductive. The score for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0-30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment. The recall period is 7 days. Scores <= 4 for each item and <= 12 for the total score are considered response. Scores <= 2 for each item and <= 6 for the total score are considered remission. The change from baseline in SDS total Score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 4.7 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 7.2 |
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and is a 5-item questionnaire used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1: work/school 2: social life 3: family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when underproductive. The score for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0-30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment. The recall period is 7 days. Scores <= 4 for each item and <= 12 for the total score are considered response. Scores <= 2 for each item and <= 6 for the total score are considered remission. The change from baseline in SDS total Score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 2.2 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 6.8 |
Time to Relapse in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)
Relapse is defined as any of following: Montgomery-asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) total score greater than or equal to (>=) 22 for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 5-15 days and/or hospitalization for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event to be suggestive of a relapse of depressive illness such as suicide attempt/completed suicide/hospitalization for suicide prevention; If hospitalized, start date of hospitalization will be date of relapse, if not hospitalized date of event will be used. MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal-severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. Stable remission: MADRS total score less than or equal to (<=) 12 for at least 3 of last 4 weeks of OP phase, with 1 excursion total score greater than (>) 12 or one missing assessment at OP week 13 or 14. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the first relapse during the maintenance phase (up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | NA |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 273.0 |
Time to Relapse in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)
Relapse is defined as any of following: MADRS total score >= 22 for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 5-15 days and/or hospitalization for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event to be suggestive of a relapse of depressive illness such as suicide attempt/completed suicide/hospitalization for suicide prevention; If hospitalized, start date of hospitalization will be date of relapse, if not hospitalized date of event will be used. MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal-severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. Stable response is defined as >= 50 percent (%) reduction in MADRS total score from baseline (Day 1 of induction phase, prior to first intranasal dose) in each of the last 2 weeks of the OP phase, but without meeting criteria for stable remission. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the first relapse during the maintenance phase (up to 92 Weeks)
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD | 635.0 |
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo | 88.0 |
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus
The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on endoscope insertion in children (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of the endoscope into the esophagus.
Intervention | mg/kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Ketamine 0 mg/kg | 6.1 |
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg | 4.5 |
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg | 4.7 |
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg | 1.1 |
Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration
The patient will be observed for apnea after propofol is administered until the endoscopy procedure is complete. Duration of apnea will be recorded. (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: This outcome will be measured after propofol is administered until the end of the procedure.
Intervention | seconds (Mean) |
---|---|
Ketamine 0 mg/kg | 59 |
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg | 45 |
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg | 57 |
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg | 39 |
Incidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure
Any respiratory adverse event including desaturation <95 requiring oxygen administration or need for airway management maneuvers (jaw thrust, bag/mask ventilation) to relieve upper airway obstruction (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: From induction of anesthesia until endoscopy procedure is complete
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen | Need for airway management | |
Ketamine 0 mg/kg | 11 | 1 |
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg | 10 | 1 |
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg | 11 | 2 |
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg | 9 | 1 |
Incidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period
"Side effects including:~hallucinations and/or emergence delirium measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale dizziness nausea and/or vomiting administration of antiemetic pain > 3/10 at any site (measured using age appropriate scale) time to discharge readiness using established criteria reasons for delayed discharge (if any)" (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: From the time procedure is complete until discharge from hospital with an average time of 1 hour.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hallucinations | Nausea/vomiting | Dizziness | Nystagmus/visual disturbance | Emergence delirium | |
Ketamine 0 mg/kg | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 0 |
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0 |
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg | 0 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 |
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) Improvement
The items mostly range from a score of 0-4 but there are some questions that range from a score of 0-2. The maximum total score that can be reported is 76 and the lowest score is 0. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Items are summed together to compute the total score. Remission is defined as two consecutive Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 24 items (HRSD-24) scores < 10, and HRSD-24 total score does not increase > 3 points on the second consecutive HRSD-24, or remains < 6 at the last two consecutive treatments. HRSD-24 scores are used to define remission. (NCT01881763)
Timeframe: Days required to achieve remission (on average 3-4 weeks)
Intervention | HRSD units (Mean) |
---|---|
Ketamine | 7.82 |
Methohexital | 8.60 |
Overall Rate of Feeling Unreality
Overall rate of feeling of unreality as measured by Side Effects Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) (NCT02363270)
Timeframe: 30 minutes
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IV Push Group | 22 |
IV Drip Group | 13 |
Numeric Rating Scale of Pain
"We will compare efficacy as a difference between 2 groups in pain score at 30 minutes post-analgesic administration. The primary outcome is the difference between 2 groups in pain score at 30 minutes.~Pain will be measured via Numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain, 5 being moderate pain, and 10 being severe pain" (NCT01835262)
Timeframe: 30 minutes
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Morphine | 3.93 |
Ketamine Group | 4.07 |
Reviews
4 reviews available for ketamine and Nausea
Article | Year |
---|---|
The effect of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery: A systematic review.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Pain, Postoperative | 2022 |
Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials.
Topics: Depression; Dizziness; Humans; Hypesthesia; Ketamine; Nausea; Paresthesia; Randomized Controlled Tri | 2022 |
Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Intravenous; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety; Disease Man | 2021 |
Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation.
Topics: Adolescent; Amnesia; Analgesia; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Antiemetics; An | 2012 |
Trials
17 trials available for ketamine and Nausea
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of Intravenous Ketamine with Intrathecal Meperidine in Prevention of Post-anesthetic Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Injections, Spinal | 2021 |
Effect of Intranasal Ketamine on Pain Intensity after Cesarean Section: A Single-Center, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Cesarean Section; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Nau | 2023 |
Comparing the Effect of Gabapentin, Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, and Entonox on Pain Control in Burn Wound Dressing.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Bandages; Blood Pressure; Burns; Debridement; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Gabapentin | 2020 |
Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Arteria | 2018 |
Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Analgesics; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergen | 2019 |
Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam vs. intravenous ketamine for sedation in lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Child; Confidence Intervals; Dizzin | 2008 |
Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery.
Topics: Aged; Anesthesia; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedati | 2008 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans; | 2010 |
A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide versus intravenous ketamine for laceration repair in children.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhala | 2012 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho | 1996 |
Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, D | 1998 |
Adding ketamine in a multimodal patient-controlled epidural regimen reduces postoperative pain and analgesic consumption.
Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Dissociative; A | 1998 |
Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Topics: Adult; Amides; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cholelithiasis; Dose-R | 2001 |
[Intramuscular anesthesia with Ketalar. Our experience in 2446 cases].
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Infant; Injections, Intramusc | 1978 |
Effect of diazepam on emergence from ketamine anaesthesia. A double-blind study.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia; Diazepam; Double-Blind Method; Dreams; Female; | 1979 |
A consideration of ketamine dreams.
Topics: Anesthesia, Intravenous; Consciousness; Dilatation and Curettage; Dreams; Headache; Humans; Ketamine | 1975 |
Ketamine: behavioral effects of subanesthetic doses.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Female; Headache; Humans; Ketamine; Learning; Male; Memory; Mental Disord | 1985 |
Other Studies
16 other studies available for ketamine and Nausea
Article | Year |
---|---|
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; | 2022 |
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; | 2022 |
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; | 2022 |
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; | 2022 |
Emergency procedural sedation in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Antiemetics; Child; Contraindications, Drug; Emergency Service, Hospital; | 2020 |
Side effects of ketamine in the long-term treatment of neuropathic pain.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-U | 2008 |
"Research chemicals": tryptamine and phenethylamine use among high-risk youth.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; California; Catchment Area, Health; Confusion; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diarrhea; | 2008 |
Total intravenous anaesthesia: a technique using flunitrazepam, ketamine, muscle relaxants and controlled ventilation of the lung.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Alcuronium; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Transfu | 1980 |
[Experience with the use of ketamine in psychiatric practice].
Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Male; Nausea; Schi | 1984 |
Reduction of ketamine-induced emergence phenomena by preoperative promethazine.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Hallucinations; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Promethazine | 1982 |
Intravenous ketamine or fentanyl prolongs postoperative analgesia after intrathecal neostigmine.
Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intraveno | 1996 |
Unexpected interaction of methylphenidate (Ritalin) with anaesthetic agents.
Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Sti | 1997 |
Ketamine sedation for the reduction of children's fractures in the emergency department.
Topics: Analgesics; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Ataxia; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studi | 2000 |
[Althesin in cesarean section].
Topics: Adult; Alfaxalone Alfadolone Mixture; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Barbiturates; Blood Pressure; Cesarea | 1978 |
[Ketamine in instrumental studies and in endoscopic treatment].
Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Angiography; Bronchography; Bronchoscopy; Cerebral Angiography; Endoscopy | 1974 |
An intravenous method of anaesthesia for Caesarean section. II. Ketamine.
Topics: Acid-Base Equilibrium; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Apgar Score; Blood Pressure | 1973 |
Ketamine anesthesia in minor otologic procedures.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, | 1971 |
Rational use of ketamine as an anaesthetic.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics; Blood Pressure; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Child; Cyclohexanes; Drea | 1971 |
[Dream, nausea and vomiting during ketamine anesthesia].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics; Cyclohexanes; Diazepam; Dreams; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Pr | 1970 |