Page last updated: 2024-10-29

ketamine and Nausea

ketamine has been researched along with Nausea in 37 studies

Ketamine: A cyclohexanone derivative used for induction of anesthesia. Its mechanism of action is not well understood, but ketamine can block NMDA receptors (RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE) and may interact with sigma receptors.
ketamine : A member of the class of cyclohexanones in which one of the hydrogens at position 2 is substituted by a 2-chlorophenyl group, while the other is substituted by a methylamino group.

Nausea: An unpleasant sensation in the stomach usually accompanied by the urge to vomit. Common causes are early pregnancy, sea and motion sickness, emotional stress, intense pain, food poisoning, and various enteroviruses.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine (MK) versus morphine plus placebo (MP) in patients with acute renal colic."9.30Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. ( Bozorgi, F; Erfanian Irankar, S; Hosseini, SA; Hosseininejad, SM; Jahanian, F; Moosazadeh, M; Shahbakhti, N, 2019)
"Esketamine is a promising drug which can induce antidepressant effects in Major Depression Disorder (MDD)."9.22Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, G; Li, X; Wang, J; Wang, T; Xu, X; Xu, Z; Yang, S; Zhou, X, 2022)
"The results suggested that it is possible to improve symptoms of depression earlier by using ketamine anesthesia."9.14Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. ( Higuchi, T; Nagafusa, Y; Nakai, T; Nishikawa, T; Okamoto, N; Sakamoto, K, 2010)
"S(+)-ketamine reduced both postanesthetic shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting, when administered for postoperative analgosedation."9.13Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery. ( Beschmann, RB; Boldt, J; Maleck, WH; Mengistu, A; Piper, SN; Röhm, KD, 2008)
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with ketamine/esketamine are dissociation, anxiety, nausea, increased blood pressure, and headache."6.72Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders. ( Cao, B; Ceban, F; Chau, EH; Gill, H; Ho, RC; Kratiuk, K; Kumar, A; Lee, JG; Lee, Y; Lin, K; Lipsitz, O; Lui, LMW; Mansur, RB; McIntyre, RS; Nasri, F; Rodrigues, NB; Rosenblat, JD; Subramaniapillai, M; Swainson, J, 2021)
" The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus was not significantly different in all three groups, although all patients who received ketamine experienced drowsiness after surgery (p<0."5.41Comparison of Intravenous Ketamine with Intrathecal Meperidine in Prevention of Post-anesthetic Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Baradari, AG; Gholinataj, A; Kiabi, FH; Najafi, S, 2021)
" This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine (MK) versus morphine plus placebo (MP) in patients with acute renal colic."5.30Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. ( Bozorgi, F; Erfanian Irankar, S; Hosseini, SA; Hosseininejad, SM; Jahanian, F; Moosazadeh, M; Shahbakhti, N, 2019)
" Compared with the control group, ketamine provided significant reduction of postoperative depression scale scores, by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0."5.22The effect of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery: A systematic review. ( Ai, P; An, D; Cui, V; Shi, H; Sun, Y; Wang, J; Wei, C; Wu, A, 2022)
"Esketamine is a promising drug which can induce antidepressant effects in Major Depression Disorder (MDD)."5.22Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, G; Li, X; Wang, J; Wang, T; Xu, X; Xu, Z; Yang, S; Zhou, X, 2022)
" Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) has the advantages of being a sedative agent that does not require a painful injection and that offers shallower levels of sedation and a rapid recovery of mental state."5.16A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide versus intravenous ketamine for laceration repair in children. ( Eun, SC; Heo, CY; Jo, YH; Kim, K; Kim, SH; Kim, TY; Lee, JH; Rhee, JE, 2012)
"The results suggested that it is possible to improve symptoms of depression earlier by using ketamine anesthesia."5.14Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. ( Higuchi, T; Nagafusa, Y; Nakai, T; Nishikawa, T; Okamoto, N; Sakamoto, K, 2010)
"S(+)-ketamine reduced both postanesthetic shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting, when administered for postoperative analgosedation."5.13Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery. ( Beschmann, RB; Boldt, J; Maleck, WH; Mengistu, A; Piper, SN; Röhm, KD, 2008)
"05 mg kg(-1) +droperidol 20 microg kg(-1) was given as prophylaxis for postoperative pain and emesis, respectively."5.08Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ( Aasbø, V; Buanes, T; Grøgaard, B; Mjåland, O; Raeder, JC, 1998)
"We report difficulty with conscious sedation of a child taking methylphenidate for attention deficit disorder and possible delayed adverse interaction of ketamine and methylphenidate resulting in severe nausea, vomiting and dehydration."3.69Unexpected interaction of methylphenidate (Ritalin) with anaesthetic agents. ( Fox, L; Ririe, DG; Ririe, KL; Sethna, NF, 1997)
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with ketamine/esketamine are dissociation, anxiety, nausea, increased blood pressure, and headache."2.72Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders. ( Cao, B; Ceban, F; Chau, EH; Gill, H; Ho, RC; Kratiuk, K; Kumar, A; Lee, JG; Lee, Y; Lin, K; Lipsitz, O; Lui, LMW; Mansur, RB; McIntyre, RS; Nasri, F; Rodrigues, NB; Rosenblat, JD; Subramaniapillai, M; Swainson, J, 2021)
"Postoperative pain was rated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively by visual analogue scale scores (VAS)."2.70Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ( Argiriadou, H; Georgiou, M; Papagiannopoulou, P; Papaziogas, B; Papaziogas, T; Pavlidis, T; Sfyra, E, 2001)
"IVPCA ketamine in combination with morphine provides superior postsurgical pain relief at lower dosage and with fewer side effects than morphine alone."2.68Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia. ( Colclough, GW; Javery, KB; Steger, HG; Ussery, TW, 1996)
"Ketamine 1."2.65Effect of diazepam on emergence from ketamine anaesthesia. A double-blind study. ( Larni, HM; Mattila, MA; Nummi, SE; Pekkola, PO, 1979)
" It also reviews the comparative pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and dosing of ketamine, propofol, and ketofol as agents for procedural sedation and analgesia."2.48Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. ( Alletag, MJ; Auerbach, MA; Baum, CR, 2012)
" Studying its effects in clinics can be expected to increase our knowledge necessary for the development of new, effective, and safe "antineuralgic drug."1.35Side effects of ketamine in the long-term treatment of neuropathic pain. ( Cvrcek, P, 2008)
"Ketamine hydrochloride was administered intravenously (at a dose of two milligrams per kilogram of body weight) in ninety-nine of the patients and intramuscularly (at a dose of four milligrams per kilogram of body weight) in the other fifteen."1.31Ketamine sedation for the reduction of children's fractures in the emergency department. ( Green, NE; McCarty, EC; Mencio, GA; Walker, LA, 2000)

Research

Studies (37)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199013 (35.14)18.7374
1990's5 (13.51)18.2507
2000's6 (16.22)29.6817
2010's5 (13.51)24.3611
2020's8 (21.62)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Wang, J2
Sun, Y1
Ai, P1
Cui, V1
Shi, H1
An, D1
Wu, A1
Wei, C1
Gholinataj, A1
Baradari, AG1
Najafi, S1
Kiabi, FH1
Williamson, DJ1
Gogate, JP1
Kern Sliwa, JK1
Manera, LS1
Preskorn, SH1
Winokur, A1
Starr, HL1
Daly, EJ1
Firouzian, A1
Faghani-Makrani, N1
Nazari, Z1
Ahangari, MF1
Chaghazardi, S1
Hedari, M1
Bazargan-Hejazi, S1
Mohammadi, R1
Ahmadi, A1
Ben-Yakov, M1
Bhatt, M1
Yang, S1
Li, X1
Wang, T1
Xu, Z1
Xu, X1
Zhou, X1
Chen, G1
Ceban, F1
Rosenblat, JD1
Kratiuk, K1
Lee, Y1
Rodrigues, NB1
Gill, H1
Subramaniapillai, M1
Nasri, F1
Lui, LMW1
Lipsitz, O1
Kumar, A1
Lee, JG1
Chau, EH1
Cao, B1
Lin, K1
Ho, RC1
Mansur, RB1
Swainson, J1
McIntyre, RS1
Hayes, J1
Matava, C1
Pehora, C1
El-Beheiry, H1
Jarvis, S1
Finkelstein, Y1
Hosseininejad, SM1
Jahanian, F1
Erfanian Irankar, S1
Moosazadeh, M1
Hosseini, SA1
Shahbakhti, N1
Bozorgi, F1
Dilli, D1
Dallar, Y1
Sorgui, NH1
Piper, SN1
Beschmann, RB1
Mengistu, A1
Maleck, WH1
Boldt, J1
Röhm, KD1
Okamoto, N1
Nakai, T1
Sakamoto, K1
Nagafusa, Y1
Higuchi, T1
Nishikawa, T1
Lee, JH1
Kim, K1
Kim, TY1
Jo, YH1
Kim, SH1
Rhee, JE1
Heo, CY1
Eun, SC1
Alletag, MJ1
Auerbach, MA1
Baum, CR1
Cvrcek, P1
Sanders, B1
Lankenau, SE1
Bloom, JJ1
Hathazi, D1
Barclay, A1
Houlton, PC1
Downing, JW2
Shpilenia, LS1
Geist, ET1
Gross, BD1
Javery, KB1
Ussery, TW1
Steger, HG1
Colclough, GW1
Lauretti, GR1
Azevedo, VM1
Ririe, DG1
Ririe, KL1
Sethna, NF1
Fox, L1
Raeder, JC1
Mjåland, O1
Aasbø, V1
Grøgaard, B1
Buanes, T1
Chia, YY1
Liu, K1
Liu, YC1
Chang, HC1
Wong, CS1
McCarty, EC1
Mencio, GA1
Walker, LA1
Green, NE1
Papaziogas, B1
Argiriadou, H1
Papagiannopoulou, P1
Pavlidis, T1
Georgiou, M1
Sfyra, E1
Papaziogas, T1
Sportelli, S1
Zocco, C1
Margaria, E1
Lovera, C1
Mattila, MA1
Larni, HM1
Nummi, SE1
Pekkola, PO1
Hejja, P1
Galloon, S1
Ghoneim, MM1
Hinrichs, JV1
Mewaldt, SP1
Petersen, RC1
Fiorani, V1
Petterino, E1
Meer, FM1
Coleman, AJ1
Kramer, RJ1
Roper, AL1
Dillon, JB1
Wakisaka, K1
Inagaki, M1
Saito, T1

Clinical Trials (13)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Open-label, Long-term, Safety and Efficacy Study of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02497287]Phase 3802 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Study of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant for Relapse Prevention in Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02493868]Phase 3719 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-01Completed
Co-administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy in Children: a Dose-finding Study[NCT02295553]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial Using Ketamine or Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Improving Treatment-Resistant Depression[NCT01935115]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Effects of Low-dose Ketamine as an Adjunct to Propofol-based Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy[NCT02579642]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Comparing Therapeutic Efficacy and Cognitive Side Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Using Ketamine Versus Methohexital Anesthesia[NCT01881763]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Comparison of N2O Inhalation and Ketamine IV Injection for Sedation in the Treatment of Laceration of Pediatric Patients.[NCT00834730]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
The Use of Ketamine as Rescue Analgesia in the Recovery Room Following Opioid Administration. A Double-blind Randomised Trial in Postoperative Patients.[NCT00163969]Phase 440 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
PCA Ketamine-Morphine Versus PCA Morphine as Post-Operative Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery.[NCT06010056]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-05Completed
PCA Ketamine-Morphine Versus PCA Morphine as Post-Operative Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery[NCT06021717]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-05Completed
Comparison of Intravenous Push Dose of Low Dose Ketamine to Short Infusion of Low Dose Ketamine for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study[NCT02363270]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Completed
Low Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Moderate to Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study[NCT01835262]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Control During First Trimester Surgical Abortion[NCT03751423]Phase 3123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-10Suspended (stopped due to Study on-hold due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Will resume when possible.)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Detection Test (DET) Score

This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. The DET is a measure of psychomotor function and uses a well-validated simple reaction time. In this outcome measure, speed of performance of participants (calculated as mean of the logarithmic base 10 transformed reaction times) for correct responses was reported. Total score ranges from 2 to 3.3 log 10 milliseconds (msec). Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of Optimization/Maintenance [OP/MA] Phase)

Interventionlog10 msec (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-0.0028

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT) Score

This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. GMLT measures executive function; maze/sequencing test, scored for total number of errors. Total score ranges from 0 to 999 number of errors. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionNumber of Errors (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant6.9

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: Identification Test (IDN) Score

This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. IDN test is a measure of visual attention (choice reaction time) and scored for speed of response (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranges from 2 to 3.3 log 10 msec. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

Interventionlog10 msec (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-0.0083

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: One Back Test (ONB) Score

The ONB is a measure of working memory and scored for speed of correct response (mean of the log10-transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranges from 2 to 3.54 log10 msec. Lower score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

Interventionlog10 msec (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.0177

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Test Battery: One Card Learning Test (OCL) Score

This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. OCL test is a measure of visual episodic memory and visual recall test scored using arcsine transformation of the percentage of correct responses (CR). The range for OCL is 0 to 100 percent (%) accuracy; presented as an arcsin transformation, the range is 0 to 1.57. Higher score indicates better performance. Higher change from baseline indicates better performance. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionArcsine ([sqrt] of proportion of [CR]) (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.0502

Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Delayed Recall

HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionNumber correct (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.8

Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Number of Words Recalled

HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionNumber of words recalled (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.3

Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Recognition Discrimination Index

HVLT measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionNumber of words (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.5

Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score: Total Recall

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0 -12); the retention (%) score (0-100%) is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of learning trial 2 or 3; and the recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher score = higher cognition. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionNumber correct (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant2.8

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score During IND Phase

"SDS was a 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0 to 10 rating scale. Score for the first three items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30, higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND Phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-9.3

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score During OP/MA Phase

"SDS was a participant-reported outcome measure and was a 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0 to 10 rating scale. The score for the first three items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-1.6

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in CGI-S Scale Score During OP/MA Phase

"The CGI-S measures the severity of the participant's illness that include knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7, where 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.0

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score During IND Phase

"CGI-S measures severity of participant's illness that include knowledge of participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, impact of symptoms on participant's ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on a scale range from 0 - 7, where 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-2.0

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Scale Score During IND Phase: Health Status Index

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.190

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Scale Score During OP/MA Phase: Health Status Index

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-0.009

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Score During IND Phase: EQ-VAS

EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant17.0

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EQ-5D-5L Score During OP/MA Phase: EQ-VAS

EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant1.6

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ 5D-5L) During IND Phase: Sum Score

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-15.3

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ 5D-5L) During OP/MA Phase: Sum Score

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-0.7

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in GAD-7 Total Score During OP/MA Phase

"GAD-7 is brief and validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score ranges from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate more anxiety. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Severe (15 -21). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.2

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Total Score During IND Phase

"GAD-7 is brief, validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participant's responded to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield total score ranges from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate more anxiety. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Severity of GAD-7 is categorized as: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Severe (15 -21). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method, last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-5.9

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in MADRS Total Score During Optimization/Maintenance (OP/MA) Phase

"MADRS measure depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It evaluates 10 items: apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA Phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.3

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score During Induction (IND) Phase

"MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-16.4

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) Total Score During IND Phase

"PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (IND) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionUnit on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-8.9

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in PHQ-9 Total Score During OP/MA Phase

"PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Baseline (OP/MA) up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 52 weeks of OP/MA phase)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant-0.2

Percentage of Participants With an Increase Score From Predose at Any Time in CADSS Total Score During OP/MA Phase

"The CADSS used to measure present-state dissociative symptoms, and to assess treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms. It comprises 23 subjective items divided into 3 components: depersonalization (with score range from 0 to 28), derealization (with score range from 0 to 52), and amnesia (with score range from 0 to 8). Participants responses are coded on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = 'Severe and 4 = Extreme). The total score is sum of the 23 items and range from 0 to 92, where 0 (best) and 92 (worst). A higher score indicates a more severe condition." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Predose, up to 1.5 hours postdose (up to end of OP/MA phase [Week 52])

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant86.1

Percentage of Participants With an Increase Score From Predose at Any Time in Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) Total Score During IND Phase

"The CADSS used to measure present-state dissociative symptoms, and to assess treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms. It comprises 23 subjective items divided into 3 components: depersonalization (with score range from 0 to 28), derealization (with score range from 0 to 52), and amnesia (with score range from 0 to 8). Participants responses are coded on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = 'Severe and 4 = Extreme). The total score is sum of the 23 items and range from 0 to 92, where 0 (best) and 92 (worst). A higher score indicates a more severe condition." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Predose, up to 1.5 hours postdose (up to end of IND phase [Week 4])

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant92.0

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants who administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A TEAE defined as an event that was new in onset or increased in severity following treatment initiation. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of Follow up Phase (Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant90.1

Percentage of Participants With Cystitis, Urinary Tract Infections, Renal and Urinary Tract Symptoms, Renal and Urinary Disorders

"Percentage of participants with cystitis, urinary tract infections, renal and urinary tract symptoms, renal and urinary disorders were evaluated. Cystitis and urinary tract infections are selected MedDRA preferred terms, renal and urinary tract symptoms refers to any preferred term (PT) in the group of selected PTs; and renal and urinary disorders refers to a MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC)." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of Follow up Phase (Week 56)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CystitisUrinary tract infectionsRenal and urinary disordersRenal and urinary tract symptoms
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant0.68.110.517.0

Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by MADRS Total Score During IND Phase

"Remission is defined as MADRS total score less than or equal to (<=) 12. MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Days 8, 15, 22 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND Phase)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 8Day 15Day 22End point
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant7.315.627.247.2

Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by PHQ-9 Total Score During IND Phase

"Remission is defined as PHQ-9 total score <= 4. PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15Endpoint
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant12.726.9

Percentage of Participants With Response as Assessed by MADRS Total Score During IND Phase

"Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 % reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score. MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Days 8, 15, 22 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment during 4 weeks of IND phase)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 8Day 15Day 22End point
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant11.625.042.878.4

Percentage of Participants With Response as Assessed by PHQ-9 Total Score During IND Phase

"Response is defined as >= 50 % reduction from baseline (IND phase) in PHQ-9 total score. PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-reporting scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. A higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: none-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as the Endpoint." (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 4 Week IND phase)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15End point
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant37.262.0

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Acute Hypertension (Systolic and Diastolic) During IND and OP/MA Phases

Percentage of participants with treatment-emergent acute hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure >=180 millimeters of mercury [mm Hg] or Diastolic Blood Pressure >= 110 mm Hg) during IND and OP/MA Phases were evaluated. (NCT02497287)
Timeframe: Up to End of OP/MA phase (Week 52)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic BP >=180Diastolic BP >=110Acute hypertension
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant2.22.44.1

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The change from baseline in CGI-S score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD0.0
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo1.0

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The change from baseline in CGI-S score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD0.0
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo1.0

Change From Baseline in EQ Visual Analogue Scale Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at the time of completion, on a scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD-10.4
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo-16.1

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L EQ Visual Analogue Scale Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at the time of completion, on a scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD-1.3
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo-13.8

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Index at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

"EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health)." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD-0.067
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo-0.096

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Index at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

"EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health)." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD-0.023
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo-0.073

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Sum Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD7.5
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo10.9

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level Sum Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD3.0
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo8.4

Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Items (GAD-7) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-report assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15 -21). Item responses are summed to yield a total score (range of 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The change from baseline in GAD-7 total score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD2.2
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo4.0

Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Items Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-report assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15 -21). Item responses are summed to yield a total score (range of 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The change from baseline in GAD-7 total score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD1.4
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo2.6

Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal - severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. The change from baseline in MADRS total score (last observation carried forward [LOCF] data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD7.5
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo12.5

Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal - severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. The change from baseline in MADRS total score (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD4.4
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo11.4

Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19) and severe (20-27). The change from baseline in PHQ-9 total score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD3.3
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo5.9

Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

PHQ-9 is a 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19) and severe (20-27). The change from baseline in PHQ-9 total score, (LOCF data) at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD1.7
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo4.7

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and is a 5-item questionnaire used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1: work/school 2: social life 3: family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when underproductive. The score for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0-30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment. The recall period is 7 days. Scores <= 4 for each item and <= 12 for the total score are considered response. Scores <= 2 for each item and <= 6 for the total score are considered remission. The change from baseline in SDS total Score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD4.7
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo7.2

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Total Score at Endpoint in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and is a 5-item questionnaire used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1: work/school 2: social life 3: family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when underproductive. The score for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0-30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment. The recall period is 7 days. Scores <= 4 for each item and <= 12 for the total score are considered response. Scores <= 2 for each item and <= 6 for the total score are considered remission. The change from baseline in SDS total Score, (LOCF data), at endpoint was reported. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the endpoint. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Baseline and Endpoint (Up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD2.2
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo6.8

Time to Relapse in Participants With Stable Remission (Maintenance Phase)

Relapse is defined as any of following: Montgomery-asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) total score greater than or equal to (>=) 22 for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 5-15 days and/or hospitalization for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event to be suggestive of a relapse of depressive illness such as suicide attempt/completed suicide/hospitalization for suicide prevention; If hospitalized, start date of hospitalization will be date of relapse, if not hospitalized date of event will be used. MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal-severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. Stable remission: MADRS total score less than or equal to (<=) 12 for at least 3 of last 4 weeks of OP phase, with 1 excursion total score greater than (>) 12 or one missing assessment at OP week 13 or 14. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the first relapse during the maintenance phase (up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionDays (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral ADNA
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo273.0

Time to Relapse in Participants With Stable Response (But Not in Stable Remission) (Maintenance Phase)

Relapse is defined as any of following: MADRS total score >= 22 for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 5-15 days and/or hospitalization for worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event to be suggestive of a relapse of depressive illness such as suicide attempt/completed suicide/hospitalization for suicide prevention; If hospitalized, start date of hospitalization will be date of relapse, if not hospitalized date of event will be used. MADRS: clinician-rated scale to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. It has 10 items, scored from 0-6 (not present/normal-severe/continuous symptoms), with total score of 60. Higher scores mean more severe condition. Stable response is defined as >= 50 percent (%) reduction in MADRS total score from baseline (Day 1 of induction phase, prior to first intranasal dose) in each of the last 2 weeks of the OP phase, but without meeting criteria for stable remission. (NCT02493868)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the first relapse during the maintenance phase (up to 92 Weeks)

InterventionDays (Median)
Intranasal Esketamine + Oral AD635.0
Oral AD+ Intranasal Placebo88.0

Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus

The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on endoscope insertion in children (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of the endoscope into the esophagus.

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Ketamine 0 mg/kg6.1
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg4.5
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg4.7
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg1.1

Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration

The patient will be observed for apnea after propofol is administered until the endoscopy procedure is complete. Duration of apnea will be recorded. (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: This outcome will be measured after propofol is administered until the end of the procedure.

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Ketamine 0 mg/kg59
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg45
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg57
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg39

Incidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure

Any respiratory adverse event including desaturation <95 requiring oxygen administration or need for airway management maneuvers (jaw thrust, bag/mask ventilation) to relieve upper airway obstruction (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: From induction of anesthesia until endoscopy procedure is complete

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Desaturation requiring supplemental oxygenNeed for airway management
Ketamine 0 mg/kg111
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg101
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg112
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg91

Incidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period

"Side effects including:~hallucinations and/or emergence delirium measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale dizziness nausea and/or vomiting administration of antiemetic pain > 3/10 at any site (measured using age appropriate scale) time to discharge readiness using established criteria reasons for delayed discharge (if any)" (NCT02295553)
Timeframe: From the time procedure is complete until discharge from hospital with an average time of 1 hour.

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HallucinationsNausea/vomitingDizzinessNystagmus/visual disturbanceEmergence delirium
Ketamine 0 mg/kg00630
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg00750
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg12830
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg04990

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) Improvement

The items mostly range from a score of 0-4 but there are some questions that range from a score of 0-2. The maximum total score that can be reported is 76 and the lowest score is 0. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Items are summed together to compute the total score. Remission is defined as two consecutive Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 24 items (HRSD-24) scores < 10, and HRSD-24 total score does not increase > 3 points on the second consecutive HRSD-24, or remains < 6 at the last two consecutive treatments. HRSD-24 scores are used to define remission. (NCT01881763)
Timeframe: Days required to achieve remission (on average 3-4 weeks)

InterventionHRSD units (Mean)
Ketamine7.82
Methohexital8.60

Overall Rate of Feeling Unreality

Overall rate of feeling of unreality as measured by Side Effects Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) (NCT02363270)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Push Group22
IV Drip Group13

Numeric Rating Scale of Pain

"We will compare efficacy as a difference between 2 groups in pain score at 30 minutes post-analgesic administration. The primary outcome is the difference between 2 groups in pain score at 30 minutes.~Pain will be measured via Numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain, 5 being moderate pain, and 10 being severe pain" (NCT01835262)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Morphine3.93
Ketamine Group4.07

Reviews

4 reviews available for ketamine and Nausea

ArticleYear
The effect of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery: A systematic review.
    Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2022, Volume: 77

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Pain, Postoperative

2022
Adverse Effects of Esketamine for the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder: Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials.
    The Psychiatric quarterly, 2022, Volume: 93, Issue:1

    Topics: Depression; Dizziness; Humans; Hypesthesia; Ketamine; Nausea; Paresthesia; Randomized Controlled Tri

2022
Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders.
    CNS drugs, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Intravenous; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety; Disease Man

2021
Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2012, Volume: 28, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Amnesia; Analgesia; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Antiemetics; An

2012

Trials

17 trials available for ketamine and Nausea

ArticleYear
Comparison of Intravenous Ketamine with Intrathecal Meperidine in Prevention of Post-anesthetic Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2021, Volume: 31, Issue:6

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Injections, Spinal

2021
Effect of Intranasal Ketamine on Pain Intensity after Cesarean Section: A Single-Center, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2023, Volume: 33, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Cesarean Section; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Nau

2023
Comparing the Effect of Gabapentin, Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, and Entonox on Pain Control in Burn Wound Dressing.
    Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2020, 01-30, Volume: 41, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Bandages; Blood Pressure; Burns; Debridement; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Gabapentin

2020
Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2018, Volume: 121, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Arteria

2018
Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 2019, Volume: 37, Issue:6

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Analgesics; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergen

2019
Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam vs. intravenous ketamine for sedation in lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial.
    Indian pediatrics, 2008, Volume: 45, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Child; Confidence Intervals; Dizzin

2008
Postoperative analgosedation with S(+)-ketamine decreases the incidences of postanesthetic shivering and nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2008, Volume: 14, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Anesthesia; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedati

2008
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia.
    The journal of ECT, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Headache; Humans;

2010
A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide versus intravenous ketamine for laceration repair in children.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2012, Volume: 28, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhala

2012
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1996, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Metho

1996
Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1998, Volume: 42, Issue:1

    Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, D

1998
Adding ketamine in a multimodal patient-controlled epidural regimen reduces postoperative pain and analgesic consumption.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1998, Volume: 86, Issue:6

    Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Dissociative; A

1998
Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Surgical endoscopy, 2001, Volume: 15, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Amides; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cholelithiasis; Dose-R

2001
[Intramuscular anesthesia with Ketalar. Our experience in 2446 cases].
    Minerva anestesiologica, 1978, Volume: 44, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Infant; Injections, Intramusc

1978
Effect of diazepam on emergence from ketamine anaesthesia. A double-blind study.
    Der Anaesthesist, 1979, Volume: 28, Issue:1

    Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia; Diazepam; Double-Blind Method; Dreams; Female;

1979
A consideration of ketamine dreams.
    Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal, 1975, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthesia, Intravenous; Consciousness; Dilatation and Curettage; Dreams; Headache; Humans; Ketamine

1975
Ketamine: behavioral effects of subanesthetic doses.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1985, Volume: 5, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Female; Headache; Humans; Ketamine; Learning; Male; Memory; Mental Disord

1985

Other Studies

16 other studies available for ketamine and Nausea

ArticleYear
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2022, 09-19, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major;

2022
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2022, 09-19, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major;

2022
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2022, 09-19, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major;

2022
Longitudinal Course of Adverse Events With Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From Phase 3 Trials in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2022, 09-19, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major;

2022
Emergency procedural sedation in children.
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2020, Oct-05, Volume: 192, Issue:40

    Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Antiemetics; Child; Contraindications, Drug; Emergency Service, Hospital;

2020
Side effects of ketamine in the long-term treatment of neuropathic pain.
    Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2008, Volume: 9, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-U

2008
"Research chemicals": tryptamine and phenethylamine use among high-risk youth.
    Substance use & misuse, 2008, Volume: 43, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; California; Catchment Area, Health; Confusion; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diarrhea;

2008
Total intravenous anaesthesia: a technique using flunitrazepam, ketamine, muscle relaxants and controlled ventilation of the lung.
    Anaesthesia, 1980, Volume: 35, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alcuronium; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Transfu

1980
[Experience with the use of ketamine in psychiatric practice].
    Zhurnal nevropatologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova (Moscow, Russia : 1952), 1984, Volume: 84, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Male; Nausea; Schi

1984
Reduction of ketamine-induced emergence phenomena by preoperative promethazine.
    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 1982, Volume: 40, Issue:9

    Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Hallucinations; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Promethazine

1982
Intravenous ketamine or fentanyl prolongs postoperative analgesia after intrathecal neostigmine.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1996, Volume: 83, Issue:4

    Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Intraveno

1996
Unexpected interaction of methylphenidate (Ritalin) with anaesthetic agents.
    Paediatric anaesthesia, 1997, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Sti

1997
Ketamine sedation for the reduction of children's fractures in the emergency department.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2000, Volume: 82-A, Issue:7

    Topics: Analgesics; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Ataxia; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studi

2000
[Althesin in cesarean section].
    Minerva anestesiologica, 1978, Volume: 44, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Alfaxalone Alfadolone Mixture; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Barbiturates; Blood Pressure; Cesarea

1978
[Ketamine in instrumental studies and in endoscopic treatment].
    Minerva medica, 1974, Oct-31, Volume: 65, Issue:77

    Topics: Anesthetics, Dissociative; Angiography; Bronchography; Bronchoscopy; Cerebral Angiography; Endoscopy

1974
An intravenous method of anaesthesia for Caesarean section. II. Ketamine.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1973, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Acid-Base Equilibrium; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Apgar Score; Blood Pressure

1973
Ketamine anesthesia in minor otologic procedures.
    The Laryngoscope, 1971, Volume: 81, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics; Blood Pressure; Child; Child,

1971
Rational use of ketamine as an anaesthetic.
    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1971, Volume: 64, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics; Blood Pressure; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Child; Cyclohexanes; Drea

1971
[Dream, nausea and vomiting during ketamine anesthesia].
    Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology, 1970, Volume: 19, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics; Cyclohexanes; Diazepam; Dreams; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Nausea; Pr

1970
chemdatabank.com