cefzil and Bronchitis

Cefprozil is a novel third generation, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin with activity against a spectrum of aerobic gram-negative and positive bacteria, as well as certain anaerobes. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil may exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil may be a suitable alternative to several other commonly used beta-lactams and cephalosporins in the treatment of mild to moderate upper and lower respiratory tract infections including sinusitis, otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and skin and skin structure infections in children. Available data indicate the safety of cefprozil in both pediatric and adult population.

Topics: Bronchitis; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Humans; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Sinusitis; Skin Diseases, Infectious

The oral second generation cephalosporin cefprozil has a broad spectrum microbiologic profile, with good in vitro activity against respiratory pathogens; 90% or more of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates are susceptible to cefprozil. Clinical trials of cefprozil have consistently demonstrated good clinical success rates in upper and lower respiratory tract infections, including otitis media, sinusitis, pharyngitis/ tonsillitis and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Most recently cefprozil has demonstrated success in children with recurrent and persistent acute otitis media. Data from clinical trials including more than 4000 children and adults have shown that cefprozil is well-tolerated. The most common adverse events associated with cefprozil are gastrointestinal disturbances (i.e. diarrhea and nausea). In two patient satisfaction surveys (pediatric and adult), cefprozil was cited for having a low incidence of side effects and was rated by children as having a pleasing taste. These data indicate that cefprozil is a practical therapeutic choice for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

Topics: Adult; Bronchitis; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Infant; Otitis Media; Patient Satisfaction; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Sinusitis; Tonsillitis

Cefprozil was evaluated in four multicentre comparative studies in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections. In two studies, cefprozil 500 mg q. 12 hours was compared to cefaclor 500 mg q. eight hours for ten days of therapy. Randomization was on a 2:1 (cefprozil:cefaclor) basis in the European centres and 1:1 in North America. The clinical efficacy in acute bronchitis was 88% (284 out of 324 patients) for cefprozil and 88% (183 out of 208) for cefaclor, with successful bacteriological eradication of the causative pathogen in 86% and 82% of the patients, respectively. Amongst the patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, the clinical response rate of 80% (59 out of 74) for cefprozil appeared superior to that of cefaclor at 62% (p = 0.067), whilst the bacteriological response rates were 62% (36 out of 58) for cefprozil and 74% (20 out of 27) for cefaclor. In pneumonia, the clinical response rates for cefprozil and cefaclor therapy were similar, 82% vs. 79%, although bacteriological eradication rates were better for cefprozil at 82% than for cefaclor at 71%. In the comparison of cefprozil with cefuroxime axetil, a total of 170 patients were evaluable. The clinical and bacteriological response rates for cefprozil of 95% and 100% were better than those for cefuroxime axetil 500 mg q. 12 hours of 84% and 75%, respectively. In the cefprozil vs. amoxicillin-clavulanate, 500 mg q. eight hours comparative study, the two antibiotics displayed no significant difference in clinical or bacteriological responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Cefaclor; Cefprozil; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pneumonia; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections

A regimen of cefprozil (500 mg twice daily), a new oral cephalosporin with a broad in vitro spectrum of antimicrobial activity, was compared to standard regimens of cefaclor (500 mg three times daily), cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily), or amoxicillin/clavulanate (500 mg/125 mg three times daily) for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections (mainly bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis) in adults in three open-label, randomized trials. In the first trial, in which bacterial pathogens were isolated in initial cultures for only one-third of the patients, 90% of the pathogens were susceptible to cefprozil. A satisfactory clinical response was noted for 84% of the evaluable patients who received cefprozil versus 79% of those who received cefaclor for treatment of lower respiratory tract infections; rates of bacteriologic efficacy were 82% and 78%, respectively. In the second study rates of satisfactory clinical response were 96% with cefprozil and 83% with cefuroxime axetil (P less than .03) for treatment of bronchitis; the respective bacteriologic response rates were 100% and 92%. In the third trial, clinical efficacy was 91% for cefprozil and 87% for amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of bronchitis; bacteriologic efficacy was 95% and 96%, respectively. Tolerability and safety profiles were comparable, except that there was a higher rate of diarrhea among patients who received amoxicillin/clavulanate (P = .03).

Topics: Acute Disease; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Bronchitis; Bronchopneumonia; Cefaclor; Cefprozil; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal

Patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were treated with cefdinir 300 mg bd for 5 days or cefprozil 500 mg bd for 10 days in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. Of the 548 patients enrolled, 281 (51%) were evaluable. The clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 80% (114/142) and 72% (100/139) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefprozil, respectively. Respiratory tract pathogens were isolated from 409 (75%) of 548 admission sputum specimens, with the predominant pathogens being Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus and Moraxella catarrhalis. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 81% (157 of 193 pathogens) and 84% (166 of 198 pathogens) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefprozil, respectively. Adverse event rates while on treatment were equivalent between the two treatment groups. The incidence of diarrhoea during therapy was higher for patients treated with cefdinir (17%) than for patients treated with cefprozil (6%) (P < 0.01), but most cases were mild and did not lead to discontinuation of treatment. These results indicate that a 5 day regimen of cefdinir is as effective and safe in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis as a 10 day regimen of cefprozil.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Cefdinir; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Tonsillitis

Cefprozil was evaluated in four multicentre comparative studies in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections. In two studies, cefprozil 500 mg q. 12 hours was compared to cefaclor 500 mg q. eight hours for ten days of therapy. Randomization was on a 2:1 (cefprozil:cefaclor) basis in the European centres and 1:1 in North America. The clinical efficacy in acute bronchitis was 88% (284 out of 324 patients) for cefprozil and 88% (183 out of 208) for cefaclor, with successful bacteriological eradication of the causative pathogen in 86% and 82% of the patients, respectively. Amongst the patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, the clinical response rate of 80% (59 out of 74) for cefprozil appeared superior to that of cefaclor at 62% (p = 0.067), whilst the bacteriological response rates were 62% (36 out of 58) for cefprozil and 74% (20 out of 27) for cefaclor. In pneumonia, the clinical response rates for cefprozil and cefaclor therapy were similar, 82% vs. 79%, although bacteriological eradication rates were better for cefprozil at 82% than for cefaclor at 71%. In the comparison of cefprozil with cefuroxime axetil, a total of 170 patients were evaluable. The clinical and bacteriological response rates for cefprozil of 95% and 100% were better than those for cefuroxime axetil 500 mg q. 12 hours of 84% and 75%, respectively. In the cefprozil vs. amoxicillin-clavulanate, 500 mg q. eight hours comparative study, the two antibiotics displayed no significant difference in clinical or bacteriological responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Cefaclor; Cefprozil; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pneumonia; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections

A regimen of cefprozil (500 mg twice daily), a new oral cephalosporin with a broad in vitro spectrum of antimicrobial activity, was compared to standard regimens of cefaclor (500 mg three times daily), cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily), or amoxicillin/clavulanate (500 mg/125 mg three times daily) for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections (mainly bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis) in adults in three open-label, randomized trials. In the first trial, in which bacterial pathogens were isolated in initial cultures for only one-third of the patients, 90% of the pathogens were susceptible to cefprozil. A satisfactory clinical response was noted for 84% of the evaluable patients who received cefprozil versus 79% of those who received cefaclor for treatment of lower respiratory tract infections; rates of bacteriologic efficacy were 82% and 78%, respectively. In the second study rates of satisfactory clinical response were 96% with cefprozil and 83% with cefuroxime axetil (P less than .03) for treatment of bronchitis; the respective bacteriologic response rates were 100% and 92%. In the third trial, clinical efficacy was 91% for cefprozil and 87% for amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of bronchitis; bacteriologic efficacy was 95% and 96%, respectively. Tolerability and safety profiles were comparable, except that there was a higher rate of diarrhea among patients who received amoxicillin/clavulanate (P = .03).

Topics: Acute Disease; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Bronchitis; Bronchopneumonia; Cefaclor; Cefprozil; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal

Four patients had serum sickness-like reactions during treatment with cefprozil, a new cephalosporin. Two patients had had previous mild reactions associated with cephalosporin therapy. It remains uncertain whether cefprozil-associated serum sickness-like reaction represents a unique or a class-related adverse drug reaction.

Topics: Adult; Bronchitis; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Otitis Media; Serum Sickness; Sinusitis

Cefprozil (CFPZ, BMY-28100) fine granules were given orally to 21 children with acute bacterial infections including 15 cases of acute tonsillitis and 3 each of acute bronchitis and urinary tract infections. Good to excellent clinical responses were obtained in 19 of the 21 patients and bacterial eradications were obtained for all 11 strains found in these cases. Loose stool and eosinophilia were observed in 1 case each. From the above clinical results, it appears that CFPZ is a useful antibiotic for the treatment of pediatric patients with various bacterial infections.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Bacteria; Bronchitis; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Evaluation; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Female; Humans; Male; Tonsillitis; Urinary Tract Infections