cefotaxime and Pain

cefotaxime has been researched along with Pain* in 5 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for cefotaxime and Pain

ArticleYear
[Pain and neuroborreliosis].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, Jul-22, Volume: 146, Issue:29-30

    Pain is one of the presenting symptoms in acute neuroborreliosis. Classically, acute neuroborreliosis--also known in Europe as Bannwarth's syndrome--is a combination of radicular pain, cranial neuritis and peripheral radiculitis and inflammatory changes of the CSF. The prognosis following antibiotic therapy is favorable. At least in its early stages, however, the diagnosis neuroborreliosis might be missed or mistaken. Thus, targeted assessment of typical signs is needed to expedite examination of the CSF which then permits definitive diagnosis.

    Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Borrelia burgdorferi Group; Cefotaxime; Ceftriaxone; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; Diagnosis, Differential; Headache; Humans; Lyme Neuroborreliosis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pain; Radiculopathy; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

2004

Trials

2 trial(s) available for cefotaxime and Pain

ArticleYear
[A comparative, well-controlled study of ceftizoxime suppository against ceftizoxime intravenous injection in infantile acute pneumonia].
    The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 1986, Volume: 39, Issue:5

    We have attempted to clinically define the therapeutic usefulness of ceftizoxime suppository (CZX-S) in children with bacterial pneumonia, in a randomized trial. Intravenous injection of ceftizoxime (CZX) was used as the control. The results are summarized below. Subjects were inpatients with bacterial pneumonia, ranging in age from 9 months to 7 years and 10 months. As a rule, the daily dose was either four 250 mg (in potency) suppositories given at 6-hour intervals or 60 mg/kg body weight intravenous CZX (control) given in 4 injections at 6-hour intervals over a period of 7 days. The number of children in the study was 67. These children were divided into 2 dosage groups (suppository, 35; injection, 32) with matching pretreatment background factors. The severity of the target disease in the majority of the children was "moderate". The rate of therapeutic effectiveness was 97.1% for the suppository and 93.8% for the injection, and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Rates of efficacy by severity, presence or absence of underlying diseases, daily dose and/or complications were high without exception, and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Eradication rates for causative microorganisms, as studied in 16 children of each group, were both 93.8%. The 2 most frequently isolated causative organisms were Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Side effects were examined for 36 children of each group. The frequency of side effects did not differ significantly between the suppository group (2 with diarrhea and 1 with abdominal pain) and the injection group (1 with urticaria), and 8.3% and 2.8%, respectively. The frequency of abnormal laboratory test findings differed significantly (P less than 0.01) with respect to eosinophilia which occurred in 7 (20.6%) of the injected subjects but was not encountered in the subjects treated with suppositories. Other abnormal laboratory findings included thrombocytosis in 3 (14.3%) of the injection group and increased GOT in 1 (3.2%) of the suppository group. The suppository formulation of CZX appears to be a highly useful substitute for the injectable form, and should find a special use in children whose treatment with injections experiences some difficulty.

    Topics: Abdomen; Acute Disease; Cefotaxime; Ceftizoxime; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diarrhea; Humans; Infant; Injections, Intravenous; Pain; Pneumonia; Suppositories; Urticaria

1986
Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of ceftriaxone in humans after single-dose intramuscular administration in water and lidocaine diluents.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1982, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    The effects of 1% lidocaine as a diluent on the pharmacokinetics and tolerance of ceftriaxone administered intramuscularly were investigated in 12 adult volunteers. Each subject received two 0.5-g doses of ceftriaxone (one in water and the other in 1% lidocaine) at least 1 week apart in a randomized crossover fashion. Plasma and urine samples were collected serially and assayed for ceftriaxone content by high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean peak plasma concentration, time to attain the peak, area under the plasma curve from time zero to infinity, and elimination half-life were 45 micrograms/ml, 2.5 h, 578 micrograms . h/ml, and 7.1 h, respectively, after intramuscular administration of ceftriaxone in water diluent. The corresponding mean values in 1% lidocaine diluent were 42 micrograms/ml, 3 h, 577 micrograms . h/ml, and 7.0 h. The pharmacokinetic data suggested that 1% lidocaine does not alter either the elimination parameters or the bioavailability of intramuscularly administered ceftriaxone. The intensity and frequency of pain at the injection site were reduced considerably by the coadministered lidocaine.

    Topics: Adult; Cefotaxime; Ceftriaxone; Excipients; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Kinetics; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain

1982

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for cefotaxime and Pain

ArticleYear
Recently introduced products.
    Drug and therapeutics bulletin, 1991, Mar-04, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bacterial Infections; Breast Diseases; Carboprost; Cefixime; Cefotaxime; Fatty Acids, Essential; Female; gamma-Linolenic Acid; Humans; Linoleic Acids; Oenothera biennis; Pain; Plant Oils; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Salmeterol Xinafoate

1991
Update of safety of cefotaxime.
    Clinical therapeutics, 1982, Volume: 5 Suppl A

    Adverse reactions to various antibacterial drugs were compared in a review of the following: multiple-dose studies of cefotaxime (n = 3,463), cefazolin (n = 554), the combination gentamicin-clindamycin (n = 163), and cefoxitin (n = 18); prophylactic studies of cefotaxime (n = 300) and cefazolin (n = 149); and single-dose studies of cefotaxime (n = 314) and penicillin G procaine (n - 265). The demographic and background characteristics of the groups were similar. Results of extensive pretreatment and posttreatment laboratory tests, measures of vital signs, and physical examinations revealed no clinically important intergroup differences. In the multiple-dose studies, side effects were reported in 9.8% of the cefotaxime, 3.8% of the cefazolin, 17.2% of the gentamicin-clindamycin, and 16.7% of the cefoxitin patients. The most frequent side effects were reactions at the injection site, of the skin and appendages, and of the digestive and urogenital systems, the only significant difference being fewer injection-site reactions in the cefazolin group than in the other three groups. In the prophylactic studies one cefotaxime patient reported rash and pruritus. In the single-dose studies, side effects were reported in 1.6% of the cefotaxime and 4.2% of the penicillin patients. Side effects sufficiently severe to warrant drug discontinuation were reported in 2.1% of the cefotaxime, 0.7% of the cefazolin, 1.8% of the gentamicin-clindamycin, and in none of the cefoxitin patients. Posttreatment prolongation of prothrombin time was found in one cefotaxime patient, whose pretreatment value was also abnormal, and in two gentamicin-clindamycin patients. No patient deaths were attributed to any of the drugs.

    Topics: Blood Pressure; Cefotaxime; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Disulfiram; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Pain; Prothrombin Time

1982